2204 GI/2019

(2565)

jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

lkIrkfgd

WEEKLY

la- 18]

ubZ fnYyh] vizSy 28—ebZ 4] 2019] 'kfuokj@oS'kk[k 8—oS'kk[k 14] 1941

No. 18]

NEW DELHI, APRIL 28—MAY 4, 2019, SATURDAY/VAISAKHA 8— VAISAKHA—14, 1941

bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

कामक

कामक

कामक

कामक, लोक िशकायत तथा पशन मंालय

लोक िशकायत तथा पशन मंालय

लोक िशकायत तथा पशन मंालय

लोक िशकायत तथा पशन मंालय

(कामक और िश ण िवभाग)

(कामक और िश ण िवभाग)

(कामक और िश ण िवभाग)

(कामक और िश ण िवभाग)

नई द ली, 25 अैल, 2019

का

का

का

का.आ.

.आ.

.आ.

.आ. 648

648

648

648.—के सरकार एतदारा द ली िवशेष पुिलस  थापना अिधिनयम, 1946 (1946 का अिधिनयम सं! या 25) क#

धारा 6 के साथ प$ठत धारा 5 क# उपधारा (1) ारा द( शि)य* का योग करते -ए तिमलनाडू रा0 य सरकार गृह (पुिलस XIII)

िवभाग के शासक#य आदेश (Ms). सं. 174 दनांक 16.03.2019 के मा4 यम से ा5 त सहमित से भारतीय दंड संिहता (1860 का

के ीय अिधिनयम सं. XLV) क# धारा 354-ए, 354-बी तथा 392 व सूचना ौ<ोिगक# अिधिनयम, 2000, (2000 का के ीय

अिधिनयम सं. 21) क# धारा 66-ई तथा तिमलनाडू मिहला उBपीड़न िनषेध अिधिनयम, 1998 (1998 का तिमलनाडू अिधिनयम 44)

अपराध सं!या 59/2019 तथा भारतीय दंड संिहता (1860 का के ीय अिधिनयम सं. XLV) क# धारा 341, 294 (बी), 323, 324

एवं 506 भाग-2 के अंतगGत, अपराध सं!या 60/2019 मH िजला कोयJबटूर, पोलाची पूवM पुिलस थाना मH दजG मामले क# जांच करने के

िलए द ली िवशेष पुिलस  थापना के सद य* क# शि)य* और OेPािधकार का सम त तिमलनाडू रा0 य मH िव तार करती है ।

[फा. सं. 228/06/2019–एवीडी-II]

एस.पी.आर. िP पाठी, अवर सिचव

2566

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department of Personnel and Training)

New Delhi, the 25th April, 2019

S.O. 648.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the

Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of State

Government of Tamil Nadu, Home (Police XIII) Department, vide Government Order G.O.(Ms).No. 174 dated

16.03.2019, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment in

the whole of the State of Tamil Nadu to investigate the case registered in Coimbatore District, Pollachi East Police

Station Crime No.59/2019 under sections 354-A, 354-B and 392 of Indian Penal Code (Central Act XLV of 1860)

and section 66-E of Information Technology Act, 2000 (Central Act 21 of 2000) and section 4 of Tamil Nadu

Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 1998 (Tamil Nadu Act 44 of 1998) and Crime No.60/2019 under sections

341, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506 Part 2 of Indian Penal Code (Central Act XLV of 1860).

[F. No. 228/06/2019-AVD-II]

S.P.R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

िवुत

िवुत

िवुत

िवुत मंालय

मंालय

मंालय

मंालय

नई दली, 8 अैल, 2019

का

का

का

का. आ.

. आ.

. आ.

. आ. 649

649

649

649.—कH ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासक#य योजन* के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उप-

िनयम (4) के अनुसरण मH िव<ुत मंPालय के शासिनक िनयंPणाधीन पावरिRड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंिडया िलिमटेड के िनJ निलिखत

कायाGलय* िजनके 80 ितशत कमGचारीवृंद ने Tहदी का कायGसाधक Uान ाV कर िलया है, को एतदारा अिधसूिचत करती है:-

1. पावर िRड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंिडया िलिमटेड,

400/220 केवी पावगड़ा उपकH ,

Wयातंग-चेलूG गांव, वHकटमनाहली-पोट,

पावगड़ा, िजला तुमकूर, कनाGटक-572136

2. पावर िRड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंिडया िलिमटेड,

765/400/220 केवी उपकH ,

वसंतनरसापुरा इंडिZयल ए$रया-2 व 3,

कHपनाडो[ेरी (पोट), कोराहो\ली,

तुमकूर तालुक व िजला, कनाGटक-572128

3. पावर िRड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंिडया िलिमटेड,

कुडगी 765/400 केवी जीआईएस उपकH ,

बीजापुर-अलमाटी रा^ीय राजमागG-50 का 275 कमी टोन,

बसवनबागेवाड़ी तालुक, बीजापुर-586121

[सं. 11011/9/2017-Tहदी]

राज पाल, आ_थक सलाहकार

MINISTRY OF POWER

New Delhi, the 8th April, 2019

S.O. 649.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the

Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notify the following offices of the Power Grid Corporation of India

Ltd. under the administrative control of Ministry of Power, where 80% of the staff have acquired working knowledge of

Hindi:

1. Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.,

400/220 KV Pavagada sub-station,

Kyatagancherlu Village, Venkatamanahalli-Post,

Pavagada-Taluk, Tumkur District, Karnataka -572136

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2567

2. Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.,

765/400/220 KV Substation,

Vasantanarsapura Industrial Area-2 & 3,

Kempanadodderi (post), Kora hobli,

Tumkur (TQ and Dt), Karnataka-572128

3. Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.,

Kudgi 765/400 KV GIS Substation,

275 km stone on Bijapur-Almati NH-50,

Basavanbagewadi Taluk, Bijapur-586121

[No.11011/9/2017-Hindi]

RAJ PAL, Economic Adviser

पेोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंालय

पेोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंालय

पेोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंालय

पेोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंालय

नई दली, 3 अैल, 2019

का

का

का

का. आ.

. आ.

. आ.

. आ. 650

650

650

650.—के ीय सरकार ने पेZोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाईन (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजGन) अिधिनयम

1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमH इसके पaात् उ) अिधिनयम कहा गया हc) क# धारा 3 क# उप-धारा (1) के अधीन जारी क# गई

भारत सरकार के पेZोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंPालय क# अिधसूचना सं!या का.आ. 1373 तारीख 5 िसतJबर 2018 जो भारत के

राजपP, कािशत क# गई थी ारा उस अिधसूचना से संलd अनुसूची मH िविनeदf भूिम मH महारा^ रा0य मH िजला नािसक मH तालुका

मालेगांव कोयली - अहमदनगर - सोलापुर पेZोिलयम प$रवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपiरेशन िलिमटेड ारा पाइपलाईन िबछाने के

योजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार के अजGन के अपने आशय क# घोषणा क# थी ;

और उ) राजपP अिधिनयम क# ितयां जनता को तारीख 01 दसJबर, 2018 तक उपल\ध करा दी गई थी ;

और सOम ािधकारी ने उ) अिधिनयम क# धारा 6 क# उप-धारा (1) के अधीन के ीय सरकार को $रपोटG क# है ;

और के ीय सरकार ने, , , , उ) $रपोटG पर िवचार करने के पaात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर क उ) भूिम पाइपलाईन िबछाने

के िलए अपेिOत है, , , , उसमH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजGन करने का िविनaय कया है ;

अतः अब, , , , के ीय सरकार उ) अिधिनयम क# धारा 6 क# उप-धारा (1) ारा l( शि)य* का योग करते -ए यह घोषणा

करती है क इस अिधसूचना से संलd अनुसूची मH िविनeदf भूिम मH पाइपलाईन िबछाने के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अजGन कया

जाए ;

और सरकार उ) अिधिनयम क# धारा 6 क# उप-धारा (4) ारा l( शि)य* का योग करते -ए, , , , यह िनदmश देती है क उ)

भूिम मH उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के काशन क# तारीख से के ीय सरकार मH िनिहत होने के बजाए, , , , सभी िवलंगम* से मु)

होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपiरेशन िलिमटेड मH िनिहत होगी ।

पेZोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाईन अिधिनयम, 1962 क# धारा 10 के अधीन कसी भी Oितपू_त के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल

कॉपiरेशन िलिमटेड पूणGतया उ(रदायी होगी और पाइपलाईन से सJबि धत कसी भी मामले पर के ीय सरकार के िवop कोई वाद दावा

या कानूनी कायGवाही नहq हो सकेगी।

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

तालुका

तालुका

तालुका

तालुका -मालेगां

मालेगां

मालेगां

मालेगांव

िजला

िजला

िजला

िजला - नािसक

नािसक

नािसक

नािसक

राय

राय

राय

राय - महारा

महारा

महारा

महारा

मौजे/$ाम

मौजे/$ाम

मौजे/$ाम

मौजे/$ाम

सव%/&लॉक/सं ()लॉट सं)

सव%/&लॉक/सं ()लॉट सं)

सव%/&लॉक/सं ()लॉट सं)

सव%/&लॉक/सं ()लॉट सं)

सब

सब

सब

सब-िडव

िडव

िडव

िडव-संसंसंसं

,ेफल

,ेफल

,ेफल

,ेफल

हे.टेयर

हे.टेयर

हे.टेयर

हे.टेयर

आर

आर

आर

आर

वग/ मीटर

वग/ मीटर

वग/ मीटर

वग/ मीटर

1

2

3

4

5

6

जलगांव (Tनबयती)

87

00

21

39

86

00

28

14

82

00

46

16

84

00

04

33

81

00

11

38

80

00

52

80

79

00

34

51

74

00

31

48

2568

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

72

00

24

63

65

00

26

81

590

00

11

34

591

00

03

68

589

00

29

73

593

00

25

16

595

00

12

11

599

00

07

18

598

00

21

09

597

00

34

16

579

00

41

21

578

00

22

23

552

00

49

11

553

00

34

58

559

00

09

22

558

00

08

18

520

00

08

37

519

00

51

33

517

00

32

81

516

00

15

89

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/6/2018-ओ-आर-I/ई-23678]

शा तनु धर, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi, the 3rd April, 2019

S. O. 650.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas vide S.O. No. 1373 dated the 5th September, 2018, issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government declared its

intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of

laying Koyali-Ahmednagar-Solapur Pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Products in Taluka Malegaon in

Nashik District in the State of Maharashtra by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to

01st December 2018;

And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of said act submitted report to the

Central Government;

And Whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land

is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is

hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby directs that right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the

Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2569

Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the

P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter

relating to the pipeline.

SCHEDULE

Taluka:- Malegaon

District:- Nashik

State :- Maharashtra

Mauje / Village

Survey/ Block

No.

Sub-Div-No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Sq.mtr.

1

2

3

4

5

6

Jalgaon (Nimbait)

87

00

21

39

86

00

28

14

82

00

46

16

84

00

04

33

81

00

11

38

80

00

52

80

79

00

34

51

74

00

31

48

72

00

24

63

65

00

26

81

590

00

11

34

591

00

03

68

589

00

29

73

593

00

25

16

595

00

12

11

599

00

07

18

598

00

21

09

597

00

34

16

579

00

41

21

578

00

22

23

552

00

49

11

553

00

34

58

559

00

09

22

558

00

08

18

520

00

08

37

519

00

51

33

517

00

32

81

516

00

15

89

[F. No. R-11025(11)/6/2018-OR-I/E-23678]

SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.

नई दली, 22 अैल, 2019

का

का

का

का. आ.

. आ.

. आ.

. आ. 651

651

651

651.—पेZोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भू-उपयोग अिधकार अिधRहण) अिधिनयम 1962 (1962 के 50) के

खrड 2 क# धारा(क) के अनुसरण मH तथा पेZोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंPालय मH भारत सरकार क# दनांक 21-5-2012 क# अिधसूचना

का॰आ॰1781 का अिधsमण करते -ए, कH सरकार एतtारा ,डी5टी िजला कलेW टर (नजफ़गढ़), रा^ीय राजधानी OेP दली को अपने

कतGu* के अित$र) रा^ीय राजधानी OेP दली क# सीमा मे Tह दुतान पेZोिलयम कॉपiरेशन िलिमटेड क# एमडीपीएल उBपाद

पाइपलाइन के अंग के vप मH बहादुरगढ़ – $टक$रकलां परलाइंस के िलए उ) अिधिनयम के तहत सOम ािधकारी के vप मH कायG करने

के िलए ािधकृत करती है ।

[फा. सं. आर-11025(15)/2/2019-ओआर-I/ई-29584]

शा तनु धर, अवर सिचव

2570

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 22nd April, 2019

S. O. 651.—In pursuance of clause (a) of section 2 of Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right

of user in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) and in suppression of notification of the Government of India in Ministry of

Petroleum and Natural Gas No. S.O. 1781 dated 21-05-2012, the Central Government hereby authorizes, SDM

(Najafgarh) Government of NCT Delhi, to perform the functions of Competent Authority for Bahadurgarh Tikrikalan

spurlines as part of MDPL product Pipeline of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited in addition to his/her own

duties, under the said Act, within the territory of NCT Delhi.

[F. No. R-11025(15)/2/2019-OR-I/E-29584]

SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 23 अैल, 2019

का

का

का

का.आ.

.आ.

.आ.

.आ. 652

652

652

652.—के ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासक#य योजन* के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उपिनयम

(4) के अनुसरण मH पेZोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंPालय के शासिनक िनयंPणाधीन सावGजिनक OेP के उपsम* के िनJ निलिखत

कायाGलय* को, िजनके 80 या अिधक ितशत कमGचारी वृ द ने िह दी का कायGसाधक Uान ा5 त कर िलया है, अिधसूिचत करती है:-

1. भारत पेZोिलयम कॉपiरेशन िलिमटेड, रायपुर,

एल.पी.जी. बॉटTलग 5लांट, Rाम – खपरी,

तहसील - ितदा, िजला – रायपुर,

िपन – 493116

[सं. 11011/1/2017(िह दी)]

ऊषा िब जोला, संयुW त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)

New Delhi, the 23rd April, 2019

S.O. 652.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for official purpose of the

Unoin) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices of the Public Sector Undertakings

under the administrative control of the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, in which 80 or more per cent of the staff

have acquired working Knowledge of Hindi :-

1. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Raipur

LPG Bottling Plant, Village - Khapari,

Tahsil – Tilda, District – Raipur,

PIN - 493116

[No. 11011/1/2017(Hindi)]

USHA BINJOLA, Jt. Director (OL)

नई द ली, 23 अैल, 2019

का

का

का

का. आ.

. आ.

. आ.

. आ. 653

653

653

653.—के ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासक#य योजन* के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के

उपिनयम (4) के अनुसरण मH पेZोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंPालय के शासिनक िनयंPणाधीन सावGजिनक OेP के उपsम* के

िनJ निलिखत कायाGलय* को, िजनके 80 या अिधक ितशत कमGचारी वृ द ने िह दी का कायGसाधक Uान ा5 त कर िलया है, अिधसूिचत

करती है :-

s.सं.

कायाGलय/लोकेशन का नाम

1.

तलोजा यूब कॉJ5लेWस

इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपiरेशन िलिमटेड,

िवशेषता यूब और योजक प$रसर,

5लॉट सं. टी – 20, एमआईडीसी, तलोजा

नवी मुंबई – 410208 (महारा^)

2.

वडोदरा एलपीजी ट_मनल,

इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपiरेशन िलिमटेड,

वडोदरा – सावली रोड, पोट – दुमाड,

वडोदरा – 391749

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2571

3.

मुंबई मrडल कायाGलय,

इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपiरेशन िलिमटेड,

साजGन 5लाज़ा,

100, डा. एनी बेसंट रोड, वलM,

मुंबई – 400018

[सं. 11011/1/2017 (िह दी)]

ऊषा िबजोला, संयुक् त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)

New Delhi, the 23rd April, 2019

S.O. 653.—In pursuance of Sub Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for official purpose of the

Unoin) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices of the Public Sector Undertakings

under the administrative control of the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, in which 80 or more percent of the staff

have acquired working Knowledge of Hindi :-

Sl. No.

Name of Office/Location

1.

Taloja Lube Complex

Indian Oil Corporation Limited Visheshata Lube aur Yojak Parisar,

Plot No. T-20, MIDC, Taloja

Navi Mumbai – 410208 (Maharashtra)

2.

Vadodara LPG Terminal,

Indian Oil Corporation Limited Vadodara Sawali Road, Post – Dumad,

Vadodara-391749

3.

Mumbai Circle Office,

Indian Oil Corporation Limited,

Sarzan Plaza,

100, Dr. Ani Besent Road, Worli,

Mumbai - 400018

[No. 11011/1/2017(Hindi)]

USHA BINJOLA, Jt. Director (OL)

नई द ली, 29 अैल, 2019

का

का

का

का. आ.

. आ.

. आ.

. आ. 654

654

654

654.—पेZोिलयम एवं खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजGन)अिधिनयम, 1962, (1962 का

50) (इसमH इसके बाद उ) अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क# धारा 2 के खंड (क) के अनुसरण मH, भारत के असाधारण राजपP सं!या 370,

दनांक 13.02.2017 मH कािशत, भारत सरकार के पेZोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंPालय क# अिधसूचना का. आ. सं!या 406 (अ),

दनांक 08.02.2017 मH, भारत सरकार एतदारा, संशोधन करती है तथा आंy देश रा0य मH इंिडयन ऑयल कॉरपोरेशन िलिमटेड क#

पारादीप हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प$रयोजना के िलए पेZोिलयम एवं खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजGन)

अिधिनयम, 1962 के तहत zी बी. वHकटेशु को zी एम. आर.आर. शेषु के थान पर सOम ािधकारी के काय{ का िनवGहन करने के िलए

ािधकृत करती है।

यह अिधसूचना जारी होने क# तारीख से लागू होगी ।

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]

शा तनु धर, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019

S. O. 654.—In pursuance of clause (a) of Section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of

Right of user in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962), (hereinafter called the said Act), Government hereby, makes the

amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas. S.O. No 406

(E) dated 08.02.2017, published in the Extra Ordinary Gazette of India No. 370 dated 13.02.2017 and authorizes

Shri B. Venkatesu vice Shri M.R.R. Seshu to perform the functions of Competent Authority under the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in Land) Act, 1962 for Paradip Hyderabad Pipeline Project of Indian

Oil Corporation Limited in the state of Andhra Pradesh.

This notification is applicable from the date of issue.

[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]

SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.

2572

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कोयला मंालय

कोयला मंालय

कोयला मंालय

कोयला मंालय

नई दली, 26 अैल, 2019

का

का

का

का.आ. 655

. 655

. 655

. 655.—के ीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक OेP (अजGन और िवकास) अिधिनयम, 1957 (1957 का 20) ( िजसे इसमH

इसके पaात् उ) अिधिनयम कहा गया है ) क# धारा 4 क# उप-धारा (1) के अधीन भारत सरकार के कोयला मंPालय ारा जारी क#

गई अिधसूचना सं!यांक का. आ. 1704(अ), तारीख 10 मई,

2016 , जो भारत के राजपP, असाधारण, भाग ।।, खंड 3, उप

-

खंड

(ii),

तारीख 11 मई,

201 6 मH कािशत क# गई थी, उस अिधसूचना से उपाबp अनुसूची मH िविनeदf प$रOेP क# भूिम मH िजसका माप

912.7892 हेWटेयर (लगभग) या 2255.502 एकड़ (लगभग) है, कोयले का पूवmOण करने के अपने आशय क# सूचना दी थी और उ)

सूचना 10 मई, 2018 से ारंभ होने वाली एक वषG क# और अविध को, अिधसूचना सं!या 1651(अ), तारीख 17 अैल,2018 मH

अिधसूिचत क# गई थी ;

और, के ीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है क इस अिधसूचना से संलd अनुसूची मH िविहत उ) भूिम के भाग से

कोयला अिभा5य कया जा सकता है ।

अत:, अब, के ीय सरकार, उ) अिधिनयम क# धारा 7 क# उप-धारा (1) ारा द( शि)य* का योग करते -ए, इससे

संलd अनुसूची मH िविनeदf 912.799 हेWटेयर (लगभग) या 2255.575 एकड़ (लगभग) माप वाली भूिम मH या उस पर के सभी

अिधकार का अजGन करने के अपने आशय क# सूचना देती है ।

1ट)पण

1ट)पण

1ट)पण

1ट)पण 1 : : : : इस अिधसूचना के अधीन आने वाले OेP के रेखांक सं!यांक एससीसीएल/नैनी OेP /अिधसूचना/2018/1, तारीख

28 दसJबर, 2018 का िनरीOण महा बंधक, नैनी OेP, द Tसगरेनी कोिलयरीज़ कंपनी िलिमटेड (एक सरकारी कंपनी), एनएसी का

एच. सं!या 129, िमzापाड़ा, िजला अंगुल-759122, ओिडशा या कोयला िनयंPक, 1, काउंिसल हाउस Zीट, कोलकाता - 700001

के कायाGलय मH या कलेWटर और िजला मिजZेट, िजला अंगुल, ओिडशा के कायाGलय मH कया जा सकता है ।

1ट)पण

1ट)पण

1ट)पण

1ट)पण 2 :

2 :

2 :

2 : उ) अिधिनयम क# धारा 8 के उपबंध* क# ओर 4यान आकृf कया जाता है, िजसमH अजGन क# आपि(य* के संबंध मH

िन}िलिखत उपबंध है :-

‘’8.

)

1

(

कोई uि), जो कसी भूिम मH, िजसक# बाबत धारा 7 के अधीन अिधसूचना जारी क# गई है, िहतबp है, अिधसूचना

जारी कए जाने से तीस दन के भीतर सJ पूणG भूिम या उसके कसी भाग या ऐसी भूिम मH या उस पर के क हq अिधकार* का

अजGन कए जाने के संबंध मH आपि( कर सकेगा ।

3प4ीकरण

3प4ीकरण

3प4ीकरण

3प4ीकरण.- इस धारा के अथातगGत यह आपि( नहq मानी जाएगी, क कोई uि) कसी भूिम मH कोयला उBपादन के िलए वयं खनन

संsयाएं करना चाहता है और ऐसी संsयाएं के ीय सरकार या कसी अ य uि) को नहq करनी चािहए ।

(2) उप-धारा (1) के अधीन Bयेक आपि( सOम अिधकारी को िलिखत vप मH क# जाएगी और सOम अिधकारी, आपि(कताG को

वयं सुने जाने का या िविध uवसायी ारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसी सभी आपि(य* को सुनने के पaात् और ऐसी

अित$र) जांच, यद कोई हो, करने के पaात् , जो वह आव€यक समझता है, वह या तो धारा 7 क# उपधारा (1) के अधीन

अिधसूिचत भूिम के या ऐसी भूिम मH या उस पर के अिधकार* के संबंध मH एक $रपोटG या ऐसी भूिम के िविभ‚ टुकड़* या ऐसी भूिम मH

या उस पर के अिधकार* के संबंध मH आपि(य* पर अपनी िसफा$रश* और उसके ारा क# गई कायGवाही के अिभलेख सिहत िविभ‚

$रपोट के ीय सरकार को उसके िविनaय के िलए देगा ।

(3) इस धारा के योजन* के िलए वह uि) कसी भूिम मH िहतबp समझा जाएगा जो ितकर मH िहत का दावा करने का हकदार

होता, यद भूिम या ऐसी भूिम मH या उस पर के अिधकार इस अिधिनयम के अधीन अ_जत कर िलए जाते ।‘’

1ट)पण

1ट)पण

1ट)पण

1ट)पण 3 : : : : के ीय सरकार ने कोयला िनयंPक 1, काउंिसल हाउस Zीट, कोलकाता - 700001 को उ) अिधिनयम क# धारा 3 के

अधीन अिधसूचना सं!या का. आ. 3347(अ), तारीख 9 दसJबर, 2015, जो भारत के राजपP, भाग ।।, खंड 3, उप

-

खंड

(ii), मH

10 दसJबर, 2015 को कािशत क# गयी थी, ारा सOम ािधकारी िनयु) कया है ।

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2573

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

अनुसूची

5स

5स

5स

5सगरेनी कोिलयरीज़ कंपनी िलिमटेड

गरेनी कोिलयरीज़ कंपनी िलिमटेड

गरेनी कोिलयरीज़ कंपनी िलिमटेड

गरेनी कोिलयरीज़ कंपनी िलिमटेड

नैनी ओपनका3ट प1रयोजना

नैनी ओपनका3ट प1रयोजना

नैनी ओपनका3ट प1रयोजना

नैनी ओपनका3ट प1रयोजना, , , , नैनी ,े

नैनी ,े

नैनी ,े

नैनी ,े

िजला अंगुल

िजला अंगुल

िजला अंगुल

िजला अंगुल, , , , ओिडशा

ओिडशा

ओिडशा

ओिडशा

[रेखांक सं8यांक

रेखांक सं8यांक

रेखांक सं8यांक

रेखांक सं8यांक एससीसीएल/नैनी ,े /अिधसूचना/2018/1

एससीसीएल/नैनी ,े /अिधसूचना/2018/1

एससीसीएल/नैनी ,े /अिधसूचना/2018/1

एससीसीएल/नैनी ,े /अिधसूचना/2018/1,तारीख

तारीख

तारीख

तारीख 28 BदसDबर

BदसDबर

BदसDबर

BदसDबर, , , , 201

201

201

2018

8

8

8 ] ] ] ]

(I)

(I)

(I)

(I)

सारणी

सारणी

सारणी

सारणी

.सं.

ाम का नाम

थाना

थाना

सं या िजला

भूिम का कार (हेटेयर म)

जोड़,

हेटेयर म

जोड़, एकड़ म

टपिणयां

अिभधृित

वन

गैर-वन

सरकारी

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

(10)

(11)

1

कासीडीहा

छदीपादा 95

अंगुल 0.961

9.805

0.750

11.516

28.457

भाग

2

त"तुलोई

गोपीनाथपुर

छदीपादा 94

अंगुल -

1.461

0.654

2.115

5.226

भाग

3

थलीपसी

छदीपादा 101

अंगुल 20.555

4.207

3.052

27.814

68.730

भाग

4

िब(बाधारापुर छदीपादा 102

अंगुल 35.724

51.101

8.873

95.698

236.475

पूण*

5

कुडापासी

छदीपादा 103

अंगुल 42.488

56.744

1.716

100.948

249.448

भाग

6

धौराखमान

छदीपादा 104

अंगुल 12.099

16.862

2.652

31.613

78.117

भाग

7

छदीपादा

आरि,त वन

छदीपादा -

अंगुल 0.000

643.095

0.000

643.095

1589.122

भाग

जोड़ :

111.827

783.275

17.697

912.799

2255.575

जोड़ : 912.799 हेटेयर (लगभग) या 2255.575 एकड़ (लगभग )

1. Rाम कासीडीहा मH अ_जत कए जाने वाले 5लाट सं!यांक:

1 से 16, 17(भाग), 20(भाग), 23(भाग), 24(भाग), 25 से 29, 30(भाग), 31, 32(भाग), 33(भाग), 34(भाग), 36(भाग),

3092(भाग), 3138, 3176.

2. Rाम त तुलोई गोपीनाथपुर मH अ_जत कए जाने वाले 5लॉट सं!याक:

193(भाग), 194(भाग), 195(भाग), 196 से 199, 200(भाग), 201(भाग).

3. Rाम थलीपसी मH अ_जत कए जाने वाले 5लॉट सं!यांक:

1 से 17, 18(भाग), 19(भाग), 20(भाग), 52(भाग), 53 से 62, 63(भाग), 64(भाग), 66(भाग), 67, 68(भाग), 69 से 118,

119(भाग), 120(भाग), 229(भाग), 233(भाग), 234(भाग), 235, 236, 237(भाग), 238(भाग), 239, 240, 241(भाग),

242(भाग), 243, 244, 245(भाग), 247(भाग), 250(भाग), 251 से 431, 432(भाग), 433(भाग), 434(भाग), 436(भाग),

437(भाग), 449(भाग), 471(भाग), 472(भाग), 473, 474, 475, 476(भाग), 477 से 545, 546(भाग), 547(भाग), 548(भाग),

549, 550(भाग), 551(भाग), 552(भाग), 553(भाग), 561(भाग), 565, 566, 568, 569, 570, 576, 577, 578, 579, 580,

581, 582, 583.

4. Rाम िबJबाधारापुर मH अ_जत कए जाने वाले 5लॉट सं!यांक:

1 से 437.

5. Rाम कुडापासी मH अ_जत कए जाने वाले 5लाट सं!यांक:

1 से 460, 461(भाग), 462(भाग), 463 से 466, 467(भाग), 492(भाग), 499(भाग), 500(भाग), 501 से 522, 523(भाग),

527(भाग), 528, 529(भाग), 530(भाग), 531(भाग), 532 से 630, 631(भाग), 632(भाग), 633(भाग), 634(भाग), 635(भाग),

636 से 677, 678(भाग), 679(भाग), 680(भाग), 681(भाग), 682(भाग), 685(भाग), 686(भाग), 687(भाग), 688, 689(भाग),

690, 691(भाग), 692(भाग), 737(भाग), 738, 739, 740, 741(भाग), 769(भाग), 770 से 783, 784(भाग), 795(भाग),

796(भाग), 797(भाग), 802(भाग), 803(भाग), 804, 805, 806, 807(भाग), 809(भाग), 955(भाग), 956(भाग), 1223,

1224(भाग), 1225 से 1231, 1233 से 1297, 1300 से 1311, 1314, 1316 से 1322, 1324 से 1331, 1333 से 1363.

2574

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

6. Rाम धराखमान मH अ_जत कए जाने वाले 5लाट सं!यांक:

1 से 19, 20(भाग), 21(भाग), 22 से 52, 53(भाग), 54(भाग), 84(भाग), 85(भाग), 86 से 101, 102(भाग), 103, 104,

105(भाग), 176(भाग), 178(भाग), 179(भाग), 180(भाग), 181(भाग), 182 से 212, 213(भाग), 214 से 221, 222(भाग),

223(भाग), 224(भाग), 225(भाग), 226(भाग), 255(भाग), 256(भाग), 257(भाग), 258, 259, 260(भाग), 261, 262(भाग),

265(भाग), 266(भाग), 267, 268(भाग), 269(भाग), 270(भाग), 550 से 553, 558 से 563, 566, 567, 570 से 572, 574,

575, 578 से 582, 584, 587 से 592, 595, 596, 598, 599, 600, 605, 607, 612, 614.

(7)

(7)

(7)

(7) छHदीपादा आरिOत वन: 643.095 हेWटेयर या 643.095 एकड़

अ_जत क# जाने वाली भूिम का िववरण नीचे सारणी मH दया गया है:-

(II)

(II)

(II)

(II) सारणी

सारणी

सारणी

सारणी

(1) Rाम – कासीडीहा

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी)

s.सं.

आर.I सeकल/

Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर

मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

1

कासीडीहा

44

3

चौधुरी धान सुपुP लखई धान व अ य

तैला

0.136

2

कासीडीहा

73

4

दसारथी सा- सुपुP पदमलवा सा- व

अ य

तैला

0.176

3

कासीडीहा

167

5

महे€ वर सा- सुपुP दसारथी सा- व अ य

तैला

0.201

4

कासीडीहा

44

9

चौधुरी धान सुपुP लखई धान व अ य

पतीता

0.090

5

कासीडीहा

44

10

चौधुरी धान सुपुP लखई धान व अ य

पतीता

0.041

6

कासीडीहा

44

11

चौधुरी धान सुपुP लखई धान व अ य

पतीता

0.317

जोड़

जोड़

जोड़

जोड़ : : : :

$ाम

$ाम

$ाम

$ाम : : : : कासीडीहा

कासीडीहा

कासीडीहा

कासीडीहा

0.961

0.961

0.961

0.961

(2) Rाम – थलीपसी

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी)

s.सं.

आर.I

सeकल/

Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर

मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

1

थलीपसी

8

2

िखरमोहन सा… सुपुP जोगे सा… और अ य

तैला

0.607

2

थलीपसी

46/5

3

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब†णु चरण सा…

तैला

0.133

3

थलीपसी

45

4

सुदशGन नायक सुपुP दबाकर और अ य

पतीता

0.061

4

थलीपसी

45

5

सुदशGन नायक सुपुP दबाकर और अ य

तैला

0.178

5

थलीपसी

21

6

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और अ य

पतीता

0.101

6

थलीपसी

21

7

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और अ य

पतीता

0.174

7

थलीपसी

21

8

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और अ य

तैला

0.243

8

थलीपसी

21

9

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और अ य

तैला

0.174

9

थलीपसी

21

10

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और अ य

पतीता

0.049

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2575

10

थलीपसी

43

12

संतकुमार सा… सुपुP सुकv सा… और अ य

पतीता

0.118

11

थलीपसी

43

13

संतकुमार सा… सुपुP सुकv सा… और अ य

पतीता

0.510

12

थलीपसी

43

14

संतकुमार सा… सुपुP सुकv सा… और अ य

पतीता

0.049

13

थलीपसी

14

15

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालव सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

दो फसली

0.542

14

थलीपसी

14

16

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालव सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

दो फसली

0.257

15

थलीपसी

14

17

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालव सा… और अ य

पतीता

0.047

16

थलीपसी

14

18

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालव सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

दो फसली

0.198

17

थलीपसी

14

19

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालव सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

दो फसली

0.003

18

थलीपसी

21

52

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.067

19

थलीपसी

21

53

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.105

20

थलीपसी

21

54

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.105

21

थलीपसी

21

55

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.032

22

थलीपसी

21

56

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.026

23

थलीपसी

21

57

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.031

24

थलीपसी

21

58

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.039

25

थलीपसी

21

59

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.033

26

थलीपसी

21

60

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.040

27

थलीपसी

21

61

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.028

28

थलीपसी

21

62

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.038

29

थलीपसी

21

63

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.028

30

थलीपसी

17

64

डालगोब*डा माझी सुपुP मौलमानी माझी

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.106

31

थलीपसी

7

66

केसाबा सा… सुपुP जोगई सा… और अ य

तैला

0.028

32

थलीपसी

7

67

केसाबा सा… सुपुP जोगई सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.122

2576

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

33

थलीपसी

7

68

केसाबा सा… सुपुP जोगई सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.043

34

थलीपसी

7

69

केसाबा सा… सुपुP जोगई सा… और अ य

तैला

0.046

35

थलीपसी

7

70

केसाबा सा… सुपुP जोगई सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.051

36

थलीपसी

7

71

केसाबा सा… सुपुP जोगई सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.091

37

थलीपसी

7

72

केसाबा सा… सुपुP जोगई सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.054

38

थलीपसी

7

73

केसाबा सा… सुपुP जोगई सा… और अ य

तैला

0.040

39

थलीपसी

13

74

जोगी सा… सुपुP बंछा सा…

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.091

40

थलीपसी

7

75

केसाबा सा… सुपुP जोगई सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.178

41

थलीपसी

7

76

केसाबा सा… सुपुP जोगई सा… और अ य

तैला

0.091

42

थलीपसी

20

79

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मैगुनी सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.199

43

थलीपसी

20

80

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मैगुनी सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.059

44

थलीपसी

38

81

बुिधया माझी सुपुP नाबागाना माझी

तैला

0.221

45

थलीपसी

20

87

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मैगुनी सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.460

46

थलीपसी

20

88

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मैगुनी सा… और अ य

पतीता

0.053

47

थलीपसी

6

91

का … सा… सुपुP आरता सा…

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.040

48

थलीपसी

6

92

का … सा… सुपुP आरता सा…

तैला

0.247

49

थलीपसी

27

95

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान और

अ य

तैला

0.353

50

थलीपसी

32

96

िबsम धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान और अ य ।

तैला

0.412

51

थलीपसी

25

97

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.015

52

थलीपसी

25

98

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.012

53

थलीपसी

25

99

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.024

54

थलीपसी

25

100

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.025

55

थलीपसी

46/6

101

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.072

56

थलीपसी

30

102

िबsम धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान और अ य

तैला

0.190

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2577

57

थलीपसी

33

103

भागाबत गोसा‡ सुपुP जदुनाथ धान और

अ य

तैला

0.031

58

थलीपसी

46/4

105

जसबंत धान सुपुP जोगीनाथ धान और

अ य

घाराबरी

0.117

59

थलीपसी

9

106

िग$रश च ा धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

घाराबरी

0.119

60

थलीपसी

25

107

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

घाराबरी

0.103

61

थलीपसी

44

108

सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.022

62

थलीपसी

46/6

109

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.022

63

थलीपसी

37

110

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.022

64

थलीपसी

30

111

िबsम धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान और

अ य

तैला

0.158

65

थलीपसी

6

112

कान… सा… सुपुP अराता सा…

घाराबरी

0.146

66

थलीपसी

22

115

पािडया सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और अ य

घाराबरी

0.087

67

थलीपसी

6

116

कान… सा… सुपुP अराता सा…

घाराबरी

0.077

68

थलीपसी

21

117

पािडया सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और अ य

घाराबरी

0.102

69

थलीपसी

21

118

पािडया सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और अ य

घाराबरी

0.090

70

थलीपसी

25

233

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.002

71

थलीपसी

39

234

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारान धान और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.111

72

थलीपसी

39

235

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारान धान और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.104

73

थलीपसी

15

236

दबाकर धान सुपुP िनBयानंदा

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.052

74

थलीपसी

39

237

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.057

75

थलीपसी

39

238

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.037

76

थलीपसी

39

239

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.056

77

थलीपसी

39

240

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.026

78

थलीपसी

39

241

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.022

79

थलीपसी

39

242

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.013

80

थलीपसी

39

243

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.052

2578

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

81

थलीपसी

39

244

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.045

82

थलीपसी

15

245

दबाकर धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.003

83

थलीपसी

39

247

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.060

84

थलीपसी

46/3

250

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.026

85

थलीपसी

25

251

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.023

86

थलीपसी

25

252

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.039

87

थलीपसी

46/6

253

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.034

88

थलीपसी

46/6

254

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.017

89

थलीपसी

44

255

सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.041

90

थलीपसी

9

256

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान व

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.027

91

थलीपसी

9

257

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान व

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.016

92

थलीपसी

37

258

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.048

93

थलीपसी

46/3

259

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान व अ य सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.034

94

थलीपसी

25

260

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.018

95

थलीपसी

9

261

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.025

96

थलीपसी

25

262

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.028

97

थलीपसी

9

263

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.036

98

थलीपसी

25

264

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.022

99

थलीपसी

9

265

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.022

100

थलीपसी

46/3

266

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.030

101

थलीपसी

44

267

सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.027

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2579

102

थलीपसी

46/6

268

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.041

103

थलीपसी

37

269

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.017

104

थलीपसी

44

270

सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.014

105

थलीपसी

37

271

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.034

106

थलीपसी

46/6

272

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.061

107

थलीपसी

46/3

273

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.049

108

थलीपसी

46/3

274

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.020

109

थलीपसी

9

275

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.043

110

थलीपसी

46/3

276

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.050

111

थलीपसी

25

277

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.063

112

थलीपसी

9

278

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.044

113

थलीपसी

37

279

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.031

114

थलीपसी

46/6

280

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.030

115

थलीपसी

46/6

281

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.052

116

थलीपसी

37

282

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.070

117

थलीपसी

44

283

सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.067

118

थलीपसी

46/6

284

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.022

119

थलीपसी

37

285

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.014

120

थलीपसी

37

286

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.029

121

थलीपसी

9

287

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.036

122

थलीपसी

25

288

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.039

2580

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

123

थलीपसी

46/3

289

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.041

124

थलीपसी

37

290

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.053

125

थलीपसी

44

291

सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.023

126

थलीपसी

44

292

सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.028

127

थलीपसी

44

293

सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.036

128

थलीपसी

46/6

294

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.035

129

थलीपसी

44

295

सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.049

130

थलीपसी

44

296

सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.038

131

थलीपसी

37

297

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.088

132

थलीपसी

37

298

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.040

133

थलीपसी

46/6

299

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.026

134

थलीपसी

46/6

300

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.041

135

थलीपसी

44

301

सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.075

136

थलीपसी

37

302

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.068

137

थलीपसी

46/6

303

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.046

138

थलीपसी

46/6

304

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.036

139

थलीपसी

44

305

सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.038

140

थलीपसी

25

306

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.034

141

थलीपसी

25

307

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.033

142

थलीपसी

25

308

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.041

143

थलीपसी

25

309

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.058

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2581

144

थलीपसी

25

310

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.044

145

थलीपसी

25

311

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.046

146

थलीपसी

25

312

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.058

147

थलीपसी

25

313

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.043

148

थलीपसी

25

314

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.045

149

थलीपसी

25

315

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.026

150

थलीपसी

25

316

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.023

151

थलीपसी

46/3

321

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.055

152

थलीपसी

9

322

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.026

153

थलीपसी

9

323

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.054

154

थलीपसी

9

324

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.049

155

थलीपसी

9

325

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.060

156

थलीपसी

9

326

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.048

157

थलीपसी

9

327

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.047

158

थलीपसी

9

328

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.049

159

थलीपसी

9

329

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.039

160

थलीपसी

9

330

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.031

161

थलीपसी

46/6

331

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.030

162

थलीपसी

36

332

बीरबर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.019

163

थलीपसी

46/3

333

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.015

164

थलीपसी

46/3

334

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.033

2582

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

165

थलीपसी

46/3

335

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.039

166

थलीपसी

46/3

336

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.044

167

थलीपसी

46/3

337

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.034

168

थलीपसी

46/3

338

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.119

169

थलीपसी

46/3

339

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.064

170

थलीपसी

46/3

340

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.045

171

थलीपसी

37

341

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.036

172

थलीपसी

37

342

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.021

173

थलीपसी

46/6

344

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.025

174

थलीपसी

46/6

345

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.035

175

थलीपसी

46/6

346

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.066

176

थलीपसी

37

347

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.102

177

थलीपसी

44

348

सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.036

178

थलीपसी

44

349

सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.039

179

थलीपसी

37

350

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.075

180

थलीपसी

37

351

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.076

181

थलीपसी

44

352

सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.145

182

थलीपसी

46/6

353

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.102

183

थलीपसी

46/6

354

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.083

184

थलीपसी

37

355

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.076

185

थलीपसी

46/6

356

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.032

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2583

186

थलीपसी

44

357

सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.029

187

थलीपसी

44

358

सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.028

188

थलीपसी

44

359

सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.041

189

थलीपसी

37

360

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.018

190

थलीपसी

37

361

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.028

191

थलीपसी

37

362

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.035

192

थलीपसी

46/6

363

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.063

193

थलीपसी

46/6

364

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.038

194

थलीपसी

46/6

365

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.056

195

थलीपसी

46/3

367

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.026

196

थलीपसी

9

369

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.025

197

थलीपसी

9

370

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.020

198

थलीपसी

25

371

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.051

199

थलीपसी

46/3

372

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.083

200

थलीपसी

25

373

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.040

201

थलीपसी

9

374

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.043

202

थलीपसी

9

375

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.016

203

थलीपसी

25

376

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.012

204

थलीपसी

46/3

377

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.029

205

थलीपसी

46/3

378

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.023

206

थलीपसी

25

379

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.036

2584

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

207

थलीपसी

9

380

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.030

208

थलीपसी

9

381

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.023

209

थलीपसी

25

382

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.023

210

थलीपसी

46/3

383

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.019

211

थलीपसी

46/3

384

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.029

212

थलीपसी

25

385

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.024

213

थलीपसी

9

386

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.024

214

थलीपसी

9

387

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.023

215

थलीपसी

25

388

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.026

216

थलीपसी

46/3

389

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.021

217

थलीपसी

46/3

390

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.031

218

थलीपसी

25

391

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.031

219

थलीपसी

9

392

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.028

220

थलीपसी

9

393

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.030

221

थलीपसी

25

394

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.030

222

थलीपसी

46/3

395

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.034

223

थलीपसी

46/3

396

जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेˆर धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.029

224

थलीपसी

25

397

भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.032

225

थलीपसी

9

398

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.030

226

थलीपसी

9

399

िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और

अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.013

227

थलीपसी

37

400

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.028

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2585

228

थलीपसी

37

401

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.106

229

थलीपसी

44

402

सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.064

230

थलीपसी

44

403

सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.046

231

थलीपसी

44

404

सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.047

232

थलीपसी

46/6

405

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.096

233

थलीपसी

46/6

406

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.078

234

थलीपसी

44

407

सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.083

235

थलीपसी

46/6

408

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.108

236

थलीपसी

37

409

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.111

237

थलीपसी

37

410

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.100

238

थलीपसी

46/6

411

च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.105

239

थलीपसी

44

412

सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.088

240

थलीपसी

37

413

िबˆनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.118

241

थलीपसी

14

417

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.128

242

थलीपसी

14

421

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.092

243

थलीपसी

14

422

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.042

244

थलीपसी

14

423

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.090

245

थलीपसी

14

424

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

जला€य एक

0.014

246

थलीपसी

14

425

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

घारीबारी

0.086

247

थलीपसी

14

426

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.030

248

थलीपसी

14

427

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.054

249

थलीपसी

14

428

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.034

2586

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

250

थलीपसी

14

429

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.020

251

थलीपसी

14

430

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.017

252

थलीपसी

14

431

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.076

253

थलीपसी

14

432

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.036

254

थलीपसी

14

433

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.026

255

थलीपसी

14

434

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.027

256

थलीपसी

14

436

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.001

257

थलीपसी

14

437

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.005

258

थलीपसी

14

472

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.009

259

थलीपसी

14

473

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.022

260

थलीपसी

14

474

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.006

261

थलीपसी

14

475

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.026

262

थलीपसी

14

476

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.012

263

थलीपसी

14

477

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.043

264

थलीपसी

14

478

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.013

265

थलीपसी

14

479

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.019

266

थलीपसी

14

480

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.016

267

थलीपसी

14

481

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.021

268

थलीपसी

14

482

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.024

269

थलीपसी

14

483

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमालवो सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.056

270

थलीपसी

18

495

नंदकशोर सा… सुपुP €याम सा…

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.034

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2587

271

थलीपसी

46/10

500

दगJबर सा… सुपुP रतनाकर सा…

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.047

272

थलीपसी

2

501

उछाब सा… सुपुP कयाण सा…

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.038

273

थलीपसी

3

502

कामरा सा… सुपुP कयाण सा…

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.044

274

थलीपसी

42

503

महान सा… सुपुP कु-v सा…

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.055

275

थलीपसी

3

510

कामरा सा… सुपुP कयाण सा…

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.126

276

थलीपसी

2

511

उछाब सा… सुपुP कयाण सा…

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.111

277

थलीपसी

42

512

महान सा… सुपुP कु-v सा…

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.062

278

थलीपसी

40

513

महान सा… सुपुP कु-v सा…

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.048

279

थलीपसी

23

514

काश सा… सुपुP कु-v सा…

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.051

280

थलीपसी

3

515

कामरा सा… सुपुP कयाण सा…

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.063

281

थलीपसी

2

516

उछाब सा… सुपुP कयाण सा…

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.092

282

थलीपसी

12

522

गोबधGन सा… सुपुP आनंदी सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.190

283

थलीपसी

18

523

नंदकशोर सा… सुपुP €याम सा…

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.080

284

थलीपसी

18

524

नंदकशोर सा… सुपुP €याम सा…

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.086

285

थलीपसी

18

525

नंदकशोर सा… सुपुP €याम सा…

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.088

286

थलीपसी

18

526

नंदकशोर सा… सुपुP €याम सा…

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.050

287

थलीपसी

18

527

नंदकशोर सा… सुपुP €याम सा…

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.058

288

थलीपसी

12

528

नंदकशोर सा… सुपुP €याम सा…

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.080

289

थलीपसी

23

529

काश सा… सुपुP कु-v सा…

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.023

290

थलीपसी

40

530

मदन सा… सुपुP कु-v सा…

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.022

291

थलीपसी

3

531

कामरा सा… सुपुP कयाण सा…

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.040

2588

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

292

थलीपसी

2

532

उछाब सा… सुपुP कयाण सा…

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.043

293

थलीपसी

11

533

गोबधGन सा… सुपुP आनंदी सा… और अ य

पतीता

0.024

294

थलीपसी

11

534

गोबधGन सा… सुपुP आनंदी सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.044

295

थलीपसी

24

535

काश सा… सुपुP कु-र सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.019

296

थलीपसी

24

536

काश सा… सुपुP कु-र सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.027

297

थलीपसी

10

539

गुजी धान सुपुP पानू धान और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

दो फसली

0.070

298

थलीपसी

10

540

गुजी धान सुपुP पानू धान और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

दो फसली

0.051

299

थलीपसी

10

543

गुजी धान सुपुP पानू धान और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

दो फसली

0.169

300

थलीपसी

10

544

गुजी धान सुपुP पानू धान और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

दो फसली

0.171

301

थलीपसी

10

548

गुजी धान सुपुP पानू धान और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

दो फसली

0.044

302

थलीपसी

14

549

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमावलो सा… और अ य सरदा जालसाचीता

दो फसली

0.050

303

थलीपसी

20

550

नू…रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

पतीता

0.018

304

थलीपसी

14

551

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमलावो सा… और अ य

पतीता

0.096

305

थलीपसी

20

552

नू…रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

दो फसली

0.036

306

थलीपसी

20

553

नू…रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

दो फसली

0.015

307

थलीपसी

14

561

दशरथी सा… सुपुP पदमलावो सा… और अ य सरदा जालसाचीता

दो फसली

0.001

308

थलीपसी

20

569

नू…रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

सरदा जालसाचीता

एक फसली

0.019

309

थलीपसी

20

570

नू…रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

तैला

0.216

310

थलीपसी

46/5

576

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण सा…

तैला

0.487

311

थलीपसी

46/5

577

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण सा…

तैला

0.140

312

थलीपसी

46/5

578

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण सा…

पतीता

0.013

313

थलीपसी

30

579

िबsम धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान और अ य

घाराबारी

0.132

314

थलीपसी

30

580

िबsम धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान और अ य

घाराबारी

0.121

315

थलीपसी

46/7

581

मनोज कुमार धान सुपुP बालूकेˆर धान

तैला

0.028

316

थलीपसी

46/8

582

कुमुदा धान सुपुP बालूकेˆर धान

तैला

0.046

317

थलीपसी

46/9

583

छबीला कुमार धान सुपुP बालूकेˆर धान

तैला

0.039

जोड़ :

20.555

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2589

(3) Rाम – िबJबाधारापुर

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी)

s.सं.

आर.I सeकल/ Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर

मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

1

िबJबाधारापुर

22

6

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नराना धान और

अ य

तैला

1.150

2

िबJबाधारापुर

16

7

िनसामिण सडांगी पB नी बालकृ†ण

सडांगी

तैला

0.387

3

िबJबाधारापुर

16

8

िनसामिण सडांगी पB नी बालकृ†ण

सडांगी

तैला

0.419

4

िबJबाधारापुर

22

12

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नराना धान और

अ य

तैला

0.147

5

िबJबाधारापुर

22

13

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नराना धान और

अ य

तैला

0.157

6

िबJबाधारापुर

22

14

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नराना धान और

अ य

तैला

0.456

7

िबJबाधारापुर

22

15

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नराना धान और

अ य

तैला

0.132

8

िबJबाधारापुर

29

16

सरोज नायक सुपुP सरदार नायक

और अ य

तैला

0.104

9

िबJबाधारापुर

34/10

18

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.274

10

िबJबाधारापुर

34/10

20

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.226

11

िबJबाधारापुर

34/5

21

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.146

12

िबJबाधारापुर

34/34

22

िसिसर कुमार बेहेरा सुपुP कािलया

बेहेरा

तैला

0.139

13

िबJबाधारापुर

10

23

िPनाथ नायक सुपुP बेड़ा नायक और

अ य

तैला

0.056

14

िबJबाधारापुर

7

29

चैत य नायक सुपुP बैशतम नायक

और अ य

तैला

0.113

15

िबJबाधारापुर

7

30

चैत य नायक सुपुP बैशतम नायक

और अ य

तैला

0.232

16

िबJबाधारापुर

27

31

रŠा नायक सुपुP कािलया नायक और

अ य

तैला

0.584

17

िबJबाधारापुर

20

32

िबकाला बाघ सुपुP मुलई बाघ और

अ य

तैला

0.505

18

िबJबाधारापुर

34/9

33

उमा नायक पŠी कयाण नायक

तैला

0.515

2590

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

19

िबJबाधारापुर

17

39

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहनहा सा… और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.030

20

िबJबाधारापुर

17

40

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहनहा सा… और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.026

21

िबJबाधारापुर

17

41

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहनहा सा… और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.051

22

िबJबाधारापुर

17

44

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहनहा सा… और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.043

23

िबJबाधारापुर

17

45

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहनहा सा… और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.028

24

िबJबाधारापुर

17

46

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहनहा सा… और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.020

25

िबJबाधारापुर

17

47

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहनहा सा… और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.091

26

िबJबाधारापुर

17

48

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहनहा सा… और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.044

27

िबJबाधारापुर

17

49

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहनहा सा… और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.063

28

िबJबाधारापुर

17

50

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहनहा सा… और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.084

29

िबJबाधारापुर

17

51

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहनहा सा… और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.082

30

िबJबाधारापुर

4

52

िखरामोहन सा… सुपुP जोगे सा…

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.079

31

िबJबाधारापुर

4

53

िखरामोहन सा… सुपुP जोगे सा…

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.069

32

िबJबाधारापुर

4

54

िखरामोहन सा… सुपुP जोगे सा…

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.038

33

िबJबाधारापुर

4

55

िखरामोहन सा… सुपुP जोगे सा…

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.048

34

िबJबाधारापुर

4

56

िखरामोहन सा… सुपुP जोगे सा…

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.052

35

िबJबाधारापुर

4

57

िखरामोहन सा… सुपुP जोगे सा…

सारदा

0.032

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2591

और अ य

जलसािचता एक

फसली

36

िबJबाधारापुर

4

58

िखरामोहन सा… सुपुP जोगे सा…

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.057

37

िबJबाधारापुर

2

59

कंदुर धान सुपुP क धा धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.042

38

िबJबाधारापुर

15

60

नाकोफोदी धान सुपुP साहादेब

धान और अ य

तैला

0.274

39

िबJबाधारापुर

8

61

जाडू धान सुपुP आराखीता धान

और अ य

तैला

0.123

40

िबJबाधारापुर

8

62

जाडू धान सुपुP आराखीता धान

और अ य

तैला

0.121

41

िबJबाधारापुर

34/8

63

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.279

42

िबJबाधारापुर

8

64

जाडू धान सुपुP आराखीता धान

और अ य

तैला

0.105

43

िबJबाधारापुर

8

65

जाडू धान सुपुP आराखीता धान

और अ य

तैला

0.106

44

िबJबाधारापुर

8

66

जाडू धान सुपुP आराखीता धान

और अ य

तैला

0.109

45

िबJबाधारापुर

8

67

जाडू धान सुपुP आराखीता धान

और अ य

तैला

0.401

46

िबJबाधारापुर

1

78

किपल धान सुपुP सुना धान

तैला

0.079

47

िबJबाधारापुर

1

80

किपल धान सुपुP सुना धान

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.130

48

िबJबाधारापुर

1

81

किपल धान सुपुP सुना धान

तैला

0.270

49

िबJबाधारापुर

31

82

zीिनबास नायक सुपुP बका नायक

तैला

0.308

50

िबJबाधारापुर

34/17

83

सरोज कुमार बेहेरा सुपुP रघुनाथ

बेहेरा और अ य

तैला

0.220

51

िबJबाधारापुर

7

84

चैत य नायक सुपुP बैशतम नायक

और अ य

तैला

0.157

52

िबJबाधारापुर

34/7

105

सBयनारायण सा… सुपुP भाजामन

सा…

तैला

0.342

53

िबJबाधारापुर

14

106

दुरजोधना सा… सुपुP पथानी सा…

और अ य

तैला

0.119

54

िबJबाधारापुर

14

107

दुरजोधना सा… सुपुP पथानी सा…

और अ य

तैला

0.180

55

िबJबाधारापुर

14

108

दुरजोधना सा… सुपुP पथानी सा…

और अ य

तैला

0.136

56

िबJबाधारापुर

26

114

महेˆर सा… सुपुP दसरथी सा… और

अ य

तैला

0.517

57

िबJबाधारापुर

30

116

सरांगाधर सा… सुपुP बंगुv सा…

तैला

0.294

58

िबJबाधारापुर

9

121

दमबुv धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

0.288

2592

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

फसली

59

िबJबाधारापुर

34

123

हvदानंद दे-रे सुपुP काथी दे-रे और

अ य

तैला

0.222

60

िबJबाधारापुर

34

128

हvदानंद दे-रे सुपुP काथी दे-रे और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.220

61

िबJबाधारापुर

34

129

हvदानंद दे-रे सुपुP काथी दे-रे और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.092

62

िबJबाधारापुर

34

130

हvदानंद दे-रे सुपुP काथी दे-रे और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.043

63

िबJबाधारापुर

5

131

िखता बाघा सुपुP कैv बाघा

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.188

64

िबJबाधारापुर

5

132

िखता बाघा सुपुP कैv बाघा

तैला

0.163

65

िबJबाधारापुर

5

133

िखता बाघा सुपुP कैv बाघा

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.064

66

िबJबाधारापुर

5

134

िखता बाघा सुपुP कैv बाघा

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.016

67

िबJबाधारापुर

5

135

िखता बाघा सुपुP कैv बाघा

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.071

68

िबJबाधारापुर

5

136

िखता बाघा सुपुP कैv बाघा

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.092

69

िबJबाधारापुर

5

137

िखता बाघा सुपुP कैv बाघा

तैला

0.434

70

िबJबाधारापुर

3

139

कशोरी धान सुपुP नाता धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.614

71

िबJबाधारापुर

33

150

हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुP मदन बेहेरा और

अ य

तैला

0.060

72

िबJबाधारापुर

33

151

हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुP मदन बेहेरा और

अ य

तैला

0.045

73

िबJबाधारापुर

33

152

हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुP मदन बेहेरा और

अ य

तैला

0.061

74

िबJबाधारापुर

33

153

हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुP मदन बेहेरा और

अ य

तैला

0.037

75

िबJबाधारापुर

33

154

हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुP मदन बेहेरा और

अ य

तैला

0.030

76

िबJबाधारापुर

33

156

हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुP मदन बेहेरा और

अ य

तैला

0.322

77

िबJबाधारापुर

33

157

हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुP मदन बेहेरा और

अ य

तैला

0.104

78

िबJबाधारापुर

33

158

हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुP मदन बेहेरा और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.130

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2593

79

िबJबाधारापुर

33

159

हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुP मदन बेहेरा और

अ य

तैला

0.160

80

िबJबाधारापुर

19

160

भलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

तैला

1.238

81

िबJबाधारापुर

22

166

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नाराना धान

और अ य

तैला

0.726

82

िबJबाधारापुर

25

168

भाजी धान सुपुP कनिथया धान

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.095

83

िबJबाधारापुर

25

169

भाजी धान सुपुP कनिथया धान

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.085

84

िबJबाधारापुर

25

173

भाजी धान सुपुP कनिथया धान

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.019

85

िबJबाधारापुर

25

174

भाजी धान सुपुP कनिथया धान

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.048

86

िबJबाधारापुर

25

175

भाजी धान सुपुP कनिथया धान

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.099

87

िबJबाधारापुर

25

176

भाजी धान सुपुP कनिथया धान

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.124

88

िबJबाधारापुर

25

177

भाजी धान सुपुP कनिथया धान

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.033

89

िबJबाधारापुर

25

178

भाजी धान सुपुP कनिथया धान

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.019

90

िबJबाधारापुर

25

179

भाजी धान सुपुP कनिथया धान

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.018

91

िबJबाधारापुर

25

180

भाजी धान सुपुP कनिथया धान

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.037

92

िबJबाधारापुर

25

181

भाजी धान सुपुP कनिथया धान

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.026

93

िबJबाधारापुर

25

182

भाजी धान सुपुP कनिथया धान

तैला

0.062

94

िबJबाधारापुर

6

183

गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर

धान और अ य

तैला

0.087

95

िबJबाधारापुर

15

184

नाकोफोदी धान सुपुP साहदेब

धान और अ य

तैला

0.077

96

िबJबाधारापुर

21

185

बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंगा धान

तैला

0.076

97

िबJबाधारापुर

2

186

कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और

अ य

तैला

0.100

98

िबJबाधारापुर

2

187

कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और

तैला

0.121

2594

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

अ य

99

िबJबाधारापुर

11

188

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

तैला

0.075

100

िबJबाधारापुर

11

189

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

तैला

0.072

101

िबJबाधारापुर

11

190

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

तैला

0.090

102

िबJबाधारापुर

23

191

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

तैला

0.100

103

िबJबाधारापुर

23

192

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

तैला

0.091

104

िबJबाधारापुर

18

193

भलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

तैला

0.113

105

िबJबाधारापुर

18

194

भलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

तैला

0.133

106

िबJबाधारापुर

21

195

बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंगा धान

तैला

0.214

107

िबJबाधारापुर

22

196

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नाराना धान

और अ य

पतीता

0.008

108

िबJबाधारापुर

23

197

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.051

109

िबJबाधारापुर

23

198

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.050

110

िबJबाधारापुर

23

199

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.046

111

िबJबाधारापुर

23

200

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.046

112

िबJबाधारापुर

23

201

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.042

113

िबJबाधारापुर

23

202

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.045

114

िबJबाधारापुर

23

203

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.072

115

िबJबाधारापुर

23

204

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.029

116

िबJबाधारापुर

23

205

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.037

117

िबJबाधारापुर

23

206

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

0.069

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2595

फसली

118

िबJबाधारापुर

23

207

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.027

119

िबJबाधारापुर

23

208

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.033

120

िबJबाधारापुर

23

209

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.033

121

िबJबाधारापुर

23

210

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.028

122

िबJबाधारापुर

23

211

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.083

123

िबJबाधारापुर

23

212

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.049

124

िबJबाधारापुर

23

213

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.036

125

िबJबाधारापुर

23

214

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.041

126

िबJबाधारापुर

23

215

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.033

127

िबJबाधारापुर

23

216

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.048

128

िबJबाधारापुर

23

217

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.037

129

िबJबाधारापुर

23

218

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.043

130

िबJबाधारापुर

23

219

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.021

131

िबJबाधारापुर

23

220

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.024

132

िबJबाधारापुर

23

221

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.029

133

िबJबाधारापुर

22

222

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

पतीता

0.060

2596

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

134

िबJबाधारापुर

23

223

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.027

135

िबJबाधारापुर

23

224

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.045

136

िबJबाधारापुर

21

225

बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंग धान

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.423

137

िबJबाधारापुर

21

226

बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंग धान

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.037

138

िबJबाधारापुर

21

227

बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंग धान

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.037

139

िबJबाधारापुर

21

228

बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंग धान

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.037

140

िबJबाधारापुर

21

229

बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंग धान

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.031

141

िबJबाधारापुर

21

230

बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंग धान

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.034

142

िबJबाधारापुर

21

231

बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंग धान

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.045

143

िबJबाधारापुर

18

232

भलभ धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.052

144

िबJबाधारापुर

18

233

भलभ धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.041

145

िबJबाधारापुर

18

234

भलभ धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.033

146

िबJबाधारापुर

18

235

भलभ धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.032

147

िबJबाधारापुर

18

236

भलभ धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.035

148

िबJबाधारापुर

18

237

भलभ धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.153

149

िबJबाधारापुर

18

238

भलभ धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.039

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2597

150

िबJबाधारापुर

18

239

भलभ धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.041

151

िबJबाधारापुर

18

240

भलभ धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.045

152

िबJबाधारापुर

18

241

भलभ धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.035

153

िबJबाधारापुर

18

242

भलभ धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.140

154

िबJबाधारापुर

15

243

नाकोफोदी धान सुपुP साहदेब

धान और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.143

155

िबJबाधारापुर

15

244

नाकोफोदी धान सुपुP साहदेब

धान और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.137

156

िबJबाधारापुर

15

245

नाकोफोदी धान सुपुP साहदेब

धान और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.118

157

िबJबाधारापुर

15

246

नाकोफोदी धान सुपुP साहदेब

धान और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.116

158

िबJबाधारापुर

15

247

नाकोफोदी धान सुपुP साहदेब

धान और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.111

159

िबJबाधारापुर

15

248

नाकोफोदी धान सुपुP साहदेब

धान और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.115

160

िबJबाधारापुर

15

249

नाकोफोदी धान सुपुP साहदेब

धान और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.047

161

िबJबाधारापुर

15

250

नाकोफोदी धान सुपुP साहदेब

धान और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.047

162

िबJबाधारापुर

6

251

गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर

धान और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.092

163

िबJबाधारापुर

6

252

गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर

धान और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.082

164

िबJबाधारापुर

6

253

गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर

धान और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.074

165

िबJबाधारापुर

6

254

गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर

धान और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.069

166

िबJबाधारापुर

6

255

गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर

सारदा

0.111

2598

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

धान और अ य

जलसािचता एक

फसली

167

िबJबाधारापुर

34/21

256

जनक दे-रे सुपुP मुलई दे-रे

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.120

168

िबJबाधारापुर

6

257

गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर

धान और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.249

169

िबJबाधारापुर

11

258

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.059

170

िबJबाधारापुर

11

259

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.015

171

िबJबाधारापुर

11

260

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.009

172

िबJबाधारापुर

11

261

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.016

173

िबJबाधारापुर

11

262

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.018

174

िबJबाधारापुर

2

263

कंदुर धान सुपुP क धा धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.053

175

िबJबाधारापुर

2

264

कंदुर धान सुपुP क धा धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.041

176

िबJबाधारापुर

2

265

कंदुर धान सुपुP क धा धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.227

177

िबJबाधारापुर

2

266

कंदुर धान सुपुP क धा धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.087

178

िबJबाधारापुर

2

267

कंदुर धान सुपुP क धा धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.101

179

िबJबाधारापुर

11

268

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.115

180

िबJबाधारापुर

11

269

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.105

181

िबJबाधारापुर

11

270

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.070

182

िबJबाधारापुर

11

271

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

0.038

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2599

अ य

फसली

183

िबJबाधारापुर

11

272

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.091

184

िबJबाधारापुर

11

273

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.098

185

िबJबाधारापुर

11

274

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.092

186

िबJबाधारापुर

2

275

कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.070

187

िबJबाधारापुर

2

276

कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.107

188

िबJबाधारापुर

2

277

कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.024

189

िबJबाधारापुर

2

278

कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.025

190

िबJबाधारापुर

2

279

कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.023

191

िबJबाधारापुर

2

280

कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.078

192

िबJबाधारापुर

2

281

कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.023

193

िबJबाधारापुर

11

282

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.023

194

िबJबाधारापुर

11

283

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.019

195

िबJबाधारापुर

11

284

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.023

196

िबJबाधारापुर

11

285

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.039

197

िबJबाधारापुर

11

286

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.033

198

िबJबाधारापुर

11

287

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

0.044

2600

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

फसली

199

िबJबाधारापुर

11

288

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.049

200

िबJबाधारापुर

11

289

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.042

201

िबJबाधारापुर

2

290

कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.052

202

िबJबाधारापुर

2

291

कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.052

203

िबJबाधारापुर

11

292

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.042

204

िबJबाधारापुर

11

293

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.015

205

िबJबाधारापुर

11

294

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.018

206

िबJबाधारापुर

11

295

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.022

207

िबJबाधारापुर

11

296

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.020

208

िबJबाधारापुर

11

297

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.107

209

िबJबाधारापुर

11

298

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.110

210

िबJबाधारापुर

11

299

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.110

211

िबJबाधारापुर

11

300

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.062

212

िबJबाधारापुर

11

301

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.093

213

िबJबाधारापुर

11

302

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

तैला

0.067

214

िबJबाधारापुर

11

303

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

अ य

तैला

0.051

215

िबJबाधारापुर

11

304

िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और

तैला

0.160

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2601

अ य

216

िबJबाधारापुर

23

305

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

तैला

0.035

217

िबJबाधारापुर

23

306

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

तैला

0.129

218

िबJबाधारापुर

23

307

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

तैला

0.165

219

िबJबाधारापुर

23

308

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

तैला

0.159

220

िबJबाधारापुर

23

309

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

तैला

0.158

221

िबJबाधारापुर

18

312

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

तैला

0.049

222

िबJबाधारापुर

18

313

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

तैला

0.056

223

िबJबाधारापुर

18

314

बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

तैला

0.040

224

िबJबाधारापुर

18

315

बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

तैला

0.045

225

िबJबाधारापुर

18

316

बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

तैला

0.040

226

िबJबाधारापुर

18

317

बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

तैला

0.043

227

िबJबाधारापुर

18

318

बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

तैला

0.041

228

िबJबाधारापुर

18

319

बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

तैला

0.026

229

िबJबाधारापुर

18

320

बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

तैला

0.057

230

िबJबाधारापुर

18

321

बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

तैला

0.037

231

िबJबाधारापुर

18

322

बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

तैला

0.037

232

िबJबाधारापुर

18

323

बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

तैला

0.039

233

िबJबाधारापुर

18

324

बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

तैला

0.081

234

िबJबाधारापुर

6

325

गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर

धान और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.078

235

िबJबाधारापुर

18

326

बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

तैला

0.070

236

िबJबाधारापुर

21

327

बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंगा धान ।

तैला

0.210

237

िबJबाधारापुर

15

328

नाकोफोदी धान सुपुP साहदेब

धान और अ य

तैला

0.171

238

िबJबाधारापुर

21

333

बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंगा धान ।

तैला

0.161

2602

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

239

िबJबाधारापुर

6

334

गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर

धान और अ य

तैला

0.123

240

िबJबाधारापुर

6

335

गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर

धान और अ य

तैला

0.056

241

िबJबाधारापुर

6

336

गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर

धान और अ य

तैला

0.119

242

िबJबाधारापुर

2

337

कंदुर धान सुपुP क धा धान और

अ य

तैला

0.179

243

िबJबाधारापुर

2

338

कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और

अ य

तैला

0.171

244

िबJबाधारापुर

2

339

कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और

अ य

तैला

0.114

245

िबJबाधारापुर

2

340

कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.086

246

िबJबाधारापुर

2

341

कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.044

247

िबJबाधारापुर

2

342

कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.028

248

िबJबाधारापुर

2

343

कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.022

249

िबJबाधारापुर

2

344

कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और

अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.022

250

िबJबाधारापुर

6

345

गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर

धान और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.044

251

िबJबाधारापुर

6

346

गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर

धान और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.034

252

िबJबाधारापुर

6

347

गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर

धान और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.027

253

िबJबाधारापुर

6

348

गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर

धान और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.030

254

िबJबाधारापुर

6

349

गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर

धान और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.027

255

िबJबाधारापुर

6

350

गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर

धान और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.029

256

िबJबाधारापुर

6

351

गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर

धान और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.051

257

िबJबाधारापुर

4

352

िखरामोहन सा… सुपुP जोगे सा…

तैला

0.112

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2603

और अ य

258

िबJबाधारापुर

9

353

दामबुv धान सुपुP िनतयानंद धान

तैला

0.146

259

िबJबाधारापुर

18

354

बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.042

260

िबJबाधारापुर

18

355

बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.065

261

िबJबाधारापुर

18

356

बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.027

262

िबJबाधारापुर

18

357

बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.076

263

िबJबाधारापुर

23

358

बै‰ब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.071

264

िबJबाधारापुर

23

359

बै‰ब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.099

265

िबJबाधारापुर

9

360

दमबुv धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.013

266

िबJबाधारापुर

9

361

दमबुv धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

तैला

0.049

267

िबJबाधारापुर

15

366

नाकोफोदी धान सुपुP साहदेब

धान और अ य

पतीता

0.065

268

िबJबाधारापुर

24

367

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

तैला

0.394

269

िबJबाधारापुर

24

368

बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

तैला

0.022

270

िबJबाधारापुर

4

369

िखरामोहन सा… सुपुP जोगे सा…

और अ य

तैला

0.277

271

िबJबाधारापुर

4

370

िखरामोहन सा… सुपुP जोगे सा…

और अ य

तैला

0.079

272

िबJबाधारापुर

4

371

िखरामोहन सा… सुपुP जोगे सा…

और अ य

तैला

0.066

273

िबJबाधारापुर

4

372

िखरामोहन सा… सुपुP जोगे सा…

और अ य

तैला

0.158

274

िबJबाधारापुर

21

377

बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंगा धान

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.172

275

िबJबाधारापुर

21

378

बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंगा धान

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.203

276

िबJबाधारापुर

21

379

बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंगा धान

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.048

277

िबJबाधारापुर

18

381

भलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान

और अ य

तैला

0.403

2604

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

278

िबJबाधारापुर

2

382

कंधुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और

अ य

तैला

0.308

279

िबJबाधारापुर

34/5

395

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब€ नु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.769

280

िबJबाधारापुर

34/2

396

भोले€ वर सा… सुपुP बगुv सा…

तैला

0.362

281

िबJबाधारापुर

34/4

397

बीनोदनी रैऊता पB नी वै€ नब रैऊता

तैला

0.320

282

िबJबाधारापुर

34/6

398

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब€ नु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.345

283

िबJबाधारापुर

34/8

399

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब€ नु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.240

284

िबJबाधारापुर

34/11

401

गंधरबा नायक सुपुP कुरतारथा नायक

तैला

0.267

285

िबJबाधारापुर

34/11

402

गंधरबा नायकसुपुP कुरतारथा नायक

तैला

0.151

286

िबJबाधारापुर

34/12

403

रंजनकुमार बेहेरा सुपुP कंदारपा

बेहेरा

तैला

0.159

287

िबJबाधारापुर

34/10

404

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब€ नु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.051

288

िबJबाधारापुर

34/10

405

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब€ नु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.053

289

िबJबाधारापुर

34/10

406

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब€ नु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.038

290

िबJबाधारापुर

34/10

407

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब€ नु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.029

291

िबJबाधारापुर

34/10

408

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब€ नु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.040

292

िबJबाधारापुर

34/10

409

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब€ नु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.081

293

िबJबाधारापुर

34/10

410

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब€ नु चरण

सा…

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.110

294

िबJबाधारापुर

34/13

411

अvण कुमार नायक सुपुP ह$रहारा

नायक

तैला

0.090

295

िबJबाधारापुर

34/14

412

सिबता सा… पB नी जागाबंधु सा…

तैला

0.055

296

िबJबाधारापुर

34/15

413

हाताकसोरा धान सुपुP दयािनिध

धान

तैला

0.019

297

िबJबाधारापुर

34/16

414

सानतना बागा सुपुP िखती बागा

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.077

298

िबJबाधारापुर

34/18

415

सारथी सा… सुपुP गौरा सा…

तैला

0.038

299

िबJबाधारापुर

34/19

416

भागाबत सा… सुपुP बाला सा…

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.016

300

िबJबाधारापुर

34/20

417

िबनय कुमार बहेरा सुपुP सुसांत

कुमार बहेरा ओर अ य

तैला

0.116

301

िबJबाधारापुर

34/22

418

धमे सा… सुपुP रिब सा…

तैला

0.108

302

िबJबाधारापुर

34/23

419

मनोज कुमार सा… सुपुP राज सा…

तैला

0.062

303

िबJबाधारापुर

34/24

420

रंजीता धानसुपुP हरमोहन धान

सारदा

जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.011

304

िबJबाधारापुर

34/24

421

रंजीता धानसुपुP हरमोहन धान

सारदा

0.014

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2605

जलसािचता एक

फसली

305

िबJबाधारापुर

34/25

422

िबनय कुमार बहेरा सुपुP सुसांत

कुमार बहेरा और अ य

तैला

0.183

306

िबJबाधारापुर

34/25

423

िबनय कुमार बहेरा सुपुP सुसांत

कुमार बहेरा और अ य

तैला

0.106

307

िबJबाधारापुर

34/25

424

िबनय कुमार बहेरा सुपुP सुसांत

कुमार बहेरा और अ य

तैला

0.044

308

िबJबाधारापुर

34/28

425

तुकाना नायक सुपुP दलासवर नायक

तैला

0.047

309

िबJबाधारापुर

34/26

426

फूल कुमार सेठी सुपुP बौरीबंधु सेठी

तैला

0.049

310

िबJबाधारापुर

34/27

427

कु तला बहेरा पŠी सुचीदानंदा बहेरा

तैला

0.033

311

िबJबाधारापुर

34/29

428

बीनापानी धान पŠी कपासवर

सा…

तैला

0.179

312

िबJबाधारापुर

34/30

429

गंगाधर बागा सुपुP िबकाल बागा

तैला

0.017

313

िबJबाधारापुर

34/31

430

धीरे बागा सुपुP िबकल बागा

तैला

0.017

314

िबJबाधारापुर

34/32

431

सुलोचना महाकुदा पŠी िब4याधर

महाकुदा

तैला

0.020

315

िबJबाधारापुर

34/33

432

रेबती रऊता पŠी तनुच ा रऊता

तैला

0.020

जोड़ :

जोड़ :

जोड़ :

जोड़ :

35.724

35.724

35.724

35.724

(4) Rाम – कुडापासी

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )

s.

सं.

आर.I सeकल/

Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर

मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

1

कुडापासी

114/27

3

zीमता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.291

2

कुडापासी

12

4

कुलमिण नायक सुपुP बैरंगी नायक

तैला

0.279

3

कुडापासी

111

6

सुदाम िसथे सुपुP बशु िसथे

तैला

0.181

4

कुडापासी

111

7

सुदाम िसथे सुपुP बशु िसथे

तैला

0.072

5

कुडापासी

111

8

सुदाम िसथे सुपुP बशु िसथे

तैला

0.105

2606

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(4) Rाम – कुडापासी

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )

s.

सं.

आर.I सeकल/

Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर

मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

6

कुडापासी

111

9

सुदाम िसथे सुपुP बशु िसथे

तैला

0.122

7

कुडापासी

107

23

zीराम िसथे सुपुP दुखु िसथे

तैला

0.088

8

कुडापासी

94

41

vमा माझी सुपुPी भागबन माझी

तैला

0.123

9

कुडापासी

94

42

vमा माझी सुपुPी भागबन माझी

तैला

1.011

10

कुडापासी

102

43

€यामाघाना माझी सुपुP भागबन

माझी

तैला

0.161

11

कुडापासी

102

44

€यामाघाना माझी सुपुP भागबन

माझी

तैला

0.107

12

कुडापासी

102

45

€यामाघाना माझी सुपुP भागबन

माझी

तैला

0.081

13

कुडापासी

102

46

€यामाघाना माझी सुपुP भागबन

माझी

पतीता

0.043

14

कुडापासी

68

48

फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी

पतीता

0.032

15

कुडापासी

68

49

फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी

सारदा अंजलासािचता

तीनी

0.086

16

कुडापासी

68

50

फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी

सारदा अंजलासािचता

तीनी

0.022

17

कुडापासी

68

51

फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी

सारदा अंजलासािचता

तीनी

0.040

18

कुडापासी

68

57

फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी

सारदा अंजलासािचता

तीनी

0.022

19

कुडापासी

68

58

फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी

सारदा अंजलासािचता

तीनी

0.022

20

कुडापासी

68

59

फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी

सारदा अंजलासािचता

तीनी

0.022

21

कुडापासी

68

60

फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी

सारदा अंजलासािचता

तीनी

0.028

22

कुडापासी

68

61

फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी

सारदा अंजलासािचता

तीनी

0.026

23

कुडापासी

68

64

फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी

सारदा अंजलासािचता

तीनी

0.057

24

कुडापासी

68

65

फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी

सारदा अंजलासािचता

तीनी

0.026

25

कुडापासी

68

66

फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी

सारदा अंजलासािचता

तीनी

0.068

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2607

(4) Rाम – कुडापासी

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )

s.

सं.

आर.I सeकल/

Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर

मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

26

कुडापासी

68

67

फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी

पतीता

0.052

27

कुडापासी

68

76

फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी

सारदा अंजलासािचता

तीनी

0.038

28

कुडापासी

68

77

फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी

सारदा अंजलासािचता

तीनी

0.082

29

कुडापासी

68

78

फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी

पतीता

0.145

30

कुडापासी

16

79

खागेˆर माझी सुपुP बागबन माझी

तैला

0.695

31

कुडापासी

16

80

खागेˆर माझी सुपुP बागबन माझी

तैला

0.227

32

कुडापासी

77

81

बीरा सा… सुपुP गंगा सा…

तैला

0.308

33

कुडापासी

50

83

पंचू सा… सुपुP गंगाधर सा…

तैला

0.307

34

कुडापासी

114

84

हडी सा… सुपुP ◌ंगंगाधर सा…

तैला

0.315

35

कुडापासी

66

98

ाणबंधु सा… सुपुP पंचू सा…

तैला

0.071

36

कुडापासी

66

99

ाणबंधु सा… सुपुP पंचू सा…

तैला

0.101

37

कुडापासी

114/27

103

zीमाता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.420

38

कुडापासी

40

104

नालू सा… सुपुP बौरी सा…

तैला

0.282

39

कुडापासी

13

107

केसाबा सा… सुपुP कुंगई सा…

तैला

0.080

40

कुडापासी

40

109

नालू सा… सुपुP बौरी सा…

तैला

0.205

41

कुडापासी

114/33

115

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.275

42

कुडापासी

114/40

116

मनमोहन धान सुपुP गदाधर धान

तैला

0.046

43

कुडापासी

114/8

117

पंचाली बा$रक पŠी भारत करन

बा$रक

तैला

0.085

44

कुडापासी

87

122

महान सा… सुपुP कु-v सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

एक फसली

0.075

45

कुडापासी

87

123

महान सा… सुपुP कु-v सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

एक फसली

0.157

46

कुडापासी

87

125

महान सा… सुपुP कु-v सा…

तैला

0.164

47

कुडापासी

87

126

महान सा… सुपुP कु-v सा…

तैला

0.143

48

कुडापासी

72

128

बलराम माझी सुपुP चैत या माझी और

अ य

तैला

0.175

49

कुडापासी

73

133

बसुदेव सा… सुपुP नंदा सा… और अ य

तैला

0.449

50

कुडापासी

43

136

नीलामिण सा… सुपुP ह$र सा…

तैला

0.100

51

कुडापासी

25

137

चौधरी सा… सुपुP िनBयानंदा सा… और

अ य

तैला

0.164

52

कुडापासी

43

138

नीलामिण सा… सुपुP ह$र सा…

तैला

0.083

53

कुडापासी

30

142

जोगी माझी सुपुP बौरी माझी और

तैला

0.527

2608

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(4) Rाम – कुडापासी

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )

s.

सं.

आर.I सeकल/

Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर

मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

अ य

54

कुडापासी

30

143

जोगी माझी सुपुP बौरी माझी और

अ य

तैला

0.048

55

कुडापासी

84

144

भागीरथी माझी सुपुP बीरा माझी और

अ य

तैला

0.420

56

कुडापासी

81

166

बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंदा धान

और अ य

तैला

0.756

57

कुडापासी

39

179

नाकाफोडी धान सुपुP साहेब धान

और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

एक फसली

0.216

58

कुडापासी

39

180

नाकाफोडी धान सुपुP साहेब धान

और अ य

पतीता

0.024

59

कुडापासी

39

181

नाकाफोडी धान सुपुP साहेब धान

और अ य

पतीता

0.009

60

कुडापासी

39

182

नाकाफोडी धान सुपुP साहेब धान

और अ य

सारदा जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.131

61

कुडापासी

39

183

नाकाफोडी धान सुपुP साहेब धान

और अ य

पतीता

0.009

62

कुडापासी

39

184

नाकाफोडी धान सुपुP साहेब धान

और अ य

तैला

0.177

63

कुडापासी

39

185

नाकाफोडी धान सुपुP साहेब धान

और अ य

भागायत देई

0.062

64

कुडापासी

39

187

नाकाफोडी धान सुपुP साहेब धान

और अ य

सारदा जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.043

65

कुडापासी

79

189

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और

अ य

सारदा जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.030

66

कुडापासी

79

190

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और

अ य

सारदा जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.045

67

कुडापासी

79

191

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और

अ य

सारदा जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.017

68

कुडापासी

79

192

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और

अ य

सारदा जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.017

69

कुडापासी

79

194

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और

अ य

सारदा जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.383

70

कुडापासी

79

195

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और

अ य

सारदा जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.197

71

कुडापासी

79

196

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और

अ य

सारदा जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.169

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2609

(4) Rाम – कुडापासी

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )

s.

सं.

आर.I सeकल/

Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर

मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

72

कुडापासी

75

197

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और

अ य

तैला

0.018

73

कुडापासी

79

198

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और

अ य

पतीता

0.014

74

कुडापासी

79

199

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और

अ य

पतीता

0.014

75

कुडापासी

79

200

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और

अ य

सारदा जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.206

76

कुडापासी

79

201

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और

अ य

सारदा जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.315

77

कुडापासी

79

202

बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और

अ य

सारदा जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.675

78

कुडापासी

23

204

चैत य नायक सुपुP बै‰व नायक और

अ य

तैला

0.016

79

कुडापासी

114/65

206

िबˆनाथ सेठी सुपुP कैलाश सेठी

तैला

0.145

80

कुडापासी

1

215

अिभराम नायक सुपुP बालक नायक

तैला

0.232

81

कुडापासी

75

222

िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और

अ य

तैला

0.040

82

कुडापासी

74

224

िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और

अ य

सारदा जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.042

83

कुडापासी

74

225

िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और

अ य

सारदा जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.137

84

कुडापासी

75

226

िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और

अ य

सारदा जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.061

85

कुडापासी

75

227

िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और

अ य

सारदा जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.195

86

कुडापासी

75

229

िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और

अ य

पतीता

0.030

87

कुडापासी

75

231

िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और

अ य

पतीता

0.031

88

कुडापासी

75

232

िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और

अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.113

89

कुडापासी

75

233

िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और

अ य

पतीता

0.016

90

कुडापासी

75

234

िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और

अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.066

91

कुडापासी

81

235

िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और

अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.040

2610

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(4) Rाम – कुडापासी

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )

s.

सं.

आर.I सeकल/

Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर

मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

92

कुडापासी

81

236

िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और

अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.039

93

कुडापासी

75

237

िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और

अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.044

94

कुडापासी

81

240

बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.045

95

कुडापासी

81

241

बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

पतीता

0.020

96

कुडापासी

81

242

बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.150

97

कुडापासी

81

243

बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

पपीता

0.008

98

कुडापासी

81

244

बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.086

99

कुडापासी

81

245

बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.098

100

कुडापासी

81

246

बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

पतीता

0.012

101

कुडापासी

81

247

बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

पतीता

0.010

102

कुडापासी

81

248

बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.072

103

कुडापासी

81

249

बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.079

104

कुडापासी

81

253

बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.116

105

कुडापासी

81

254

बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान

और अ य

पतीता

0.025

106

कुडापासी

75

260

िबsम धान सुपुP बंशीधर धान और

अ य

सारदा जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.181

107

कुडापासी

75

263

िबsम धान सुपुP बंशीधर धान और

अ य

सारदा जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.151

108

कुडापासी

75

265

िबsम धान सुपुP बंशीधर धान और

अ य

पतीता

0.013

109

कुडापासी

75

266

िबsम धान सुपुP बंशीधर धान और

अ य

पतीता

0.012

110

कुडापासी

75

267

िबsम धान सुपुP बंशीधर धान और

अ य

सारदा जलसािचता एक

फसली

0.160

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2611

(4) Rाम – कुडापासी

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )

s.

सं.

आर.I सeकल/

Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर

मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

111

कुडापासी

47

273

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.228

112

कुडापासी

47

274

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.233

113

कुडापासी

47

275

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.247

114

कुडापासी

47

276

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

पतीता

0.075

115

कुडापासी

47

277

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.132

116

कुडापासी

47

278

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.106

117

कुडापासी

47

279

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.283

118

कुडापासी

47

280

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.285

119

कुडापासी

47

281

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

पतीता

0.028

120

कुडापासी

47

282

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

पतीता

0.019

121

कुडापासी

54

283

पिडया सा… सुपुP नहैया सा… और

अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

देई

0.091

122

कुडापासी

54

284

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और

अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

देई

0.080

123

कुडापासी

114/16

289

हदीबंधु सा… सुपुP इकादुिसया सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

देई

0.021

124

कुडापासी

114/16

290

हदीबंधु सा… सुपुP इकादुिसया सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

देई

0.022

125

कुडापासी

114/16

291

हदीबंधु सा… सुपुP इकादुिसया सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

देई

0.046

126

कुडापासी

114/16

292

हदीबंधु सा… सुपुP इकादुिसया सा…

तैला

0.011

127

कुडापासी

114/16

293

हदीबंधु सा… सुपुP इकादुिसया सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

देई

0.010

128

कुडापासी

114/16

295

हदीबंधु सा… सुपुP इकादुिसया सा…

तैला

0.007

129

कुडापासी

54

297

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और

अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

देई

0.065

130

कुडापासी

114/33

298

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

देई

0.030

131

कुडापासी

54

299

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और

अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

देई

0.027

2612

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(4) Rाम – कुडापासी

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )

s.

सं.

आर.I सeकल/

Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर

मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

132

कुडापासी

114/33

300

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.014

133

कुडापासी

54

301

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और

अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

देई

0.029

134

कुडापासी

54

302

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और

अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

देई

0.089

135

कुडापासी

114/16

303

हदीबंधु सा… सुपुP इकादुिसया सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

देई

0.037

136

कुडापासी

114/16

304

हदीबंधु सा… सुपुP इकादुिसया सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

देई

0.042

137

कुडापासी

114/16

305

हदीबंधु सा… सुपुP इकादुिसया सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

देई

0.098

138

कुडापासी

54

306

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और

अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

देई

0.033

139

कुडापासी

54

307

पिड़या सा… सुपुP निहया सा… और

अ य

तैला

0.044

140

कुडापासी

114/33

309

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.107

141

कुडापासी

114/86

317

राठी सेठी सुपुP आनंद सेठी

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.036

142

कुडापासी

114/86

318

राठी सेठी सुपुP आनंद सेठी

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.016

143

कुडापासी

114/73

319

सरोिजनी नायक पB नी अजय नायक

पतीता

0.053

144

कुडापासी

114/33

320

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.255

145

कुडापासी

47

347

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

तैला

0.043

146

कुडापासी

47

348

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

तैला

0.106

147

कुडापासी

47

349

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.230

148

कुडापासी

47

350

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.065

149

कुडापासी

47

351

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.186

150

कुडापासी

47

352

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

पतीता

0.018

151

कुडापासी

47

353

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.157

152

कुडापासी

47

354

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.143

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2613

(4) Rाम – कुडापासी

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )

s.

सं.

आर.I सeकल/

Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर

मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

153

कुडापासी

47

355

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

पतीता

0.040

154

कुडापासी

47

356

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.121

155

कुडापासी

47

357

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

पतीता

0.029

156

कुडापासी

47

358

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.127

157

कुडापासी

47

359

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

पतीता

0.028

158

कुडापासी

47

360

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.116

159

कुडापासी

47

361

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.121

160

कुडापासी

114/24

364

बैशनब राउत सुपुP पूणाG च राउत

तैला

0.155

161

कुडापासी

114/24

365

बैशनब राउत सुपुP पूणाG च राउत

तैला

0.126

162

कुडापासी

99

367

सारथी धान सुपुP िसबा धान

तैला

0.182

163

कुडापासी

46

370

नु-रा सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा…

तैला

0.259

164

कुडापासी

114/79

371

मनोज कुमार सा… सुपुP गऊरा च ा

सा…

तैला

0.082

165

कुडापासी

88

375

माही दे-रे सुपुP राम दे-रे

तैला

0.101

166

कुडापासी

10

377

कपताv दे-रे सुपुP राम दे-रे और

अ य

तैला

0.114

167

कुडापासी

10

378

कपताv दे-रे सुपुP राम दे-रे और

अ य

तैला

0.319

168

कुडापासी

114/29

379

जोगे मिलक सुपुP नरो(म मिलक

तैला

0.251

169

कुडापासी

58

380

पलाऊ सा… सुपुP नाताबार सा… और

अ य

तैला

0.397

170

कुडापासी

23

381

चैत य नायक सुपुP बै‰व नायक और

अ य

तैला

0.233

171

कुडापासी

57

382

पलाऊ सा… सुपुP नाता सा… और अ य

तैला

0.211

172

कुडापासी

28

386

जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी

तैला

0.049

173

कुडापासी

28

387

जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी

तैला

0.081

174

कुडापासी

28

388

जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी

तैला

0.201

175

कुडापासी

28

389

जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी

तैला

0.207

176

कुडापासी

28

390

जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी

तैला

0.051

177

कुडापासी

28

391

जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी

तैला

0.067

178

कुडापासी

28

392

जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी

तैला

0.102

179

कुडापासी

28

393

जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी

तैला

0.099

180

कुडापासी

29

395

जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी

तैला

0.110

2614

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(4) Rाम – कुडापासी

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )

s.

सं.

आर.I सeकल/

Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर

मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

181

कुडापासी

29

396

जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी

तैला

0.193

182

कुडापासी

29

397

जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी

तैला

0.050

183

कुडापासी

28

398

जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी

तैला

0.046

184

कुडापासी

29

400

जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी

तैला

0.109

185

कुडापासी

29

401

जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी

तैला

0.089

186

कुडापासी

114/42

402

दीप धान सुपुP िPलोचन धान

तैला

0.097

187

कुडापासी

114/43

404

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.164

188

कुडापासी

24

405

चैत य नायक सुपुP बै‰व नायक और

अ य

तैला

0.176

189

कुडापासी

24

406

चैत य नायक सुपुP बै‰व नायक और

अ य

तैला

0.081

190

कुडापासी

24

407

चैत य नायक सुपुP बै‰व नायक और

अ य

तैला

0.038

191

कुडापासी

71

408

बनिबहारी सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और

अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.031

192

कुडापासी

71

409

बनिबहारी सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और

अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.016

193

कुडापासी

71

410

बनिबहारी सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और

अ य

तैला

0.019

194

कुडापासी

24

411

चैत य नायक सुपुP बैशनव नायक और

अ य

तैला

0.040

195

कुडापासी

24

412

चैत य नायक सुपुP बैशनव नायक और

अ य

तैला

0.070

196

कुडापासी

24

413

चैत य नायक सुपुP बैशनव नायक और

अ य

तैला

0.029

197

कुडापासी

24

414

चैत य नायक सुपुP बैशनव नायक और

अ य

तैला

0.064

198

कुडापासी

24

415

चैत य नायक सुपुP बैशनव नायक और

अ य

तैला

0.087

199

कुडापासी

24

416

चैत य नायक सुपुP बैशनव नायक और

अ य

तैला

0.059

200

कुडापासी

71

417

बनिबहारी सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और

अ य

तैला

0.057

201

कुडापासी

71

418

बनिबहारी सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और

अ य

तैला

0.043

202

कुडापासी

11

420

कालांदी सा… सुपुP सधाबा सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.229

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2615

(4) Rाम – कुडापासी

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )

s.

सं.

आर.I सeकल/

Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर

मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

203

कुडापासी

70

421

बनिबहारी सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.156

204

कुडापासी

70

422

बनिबहारी सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा…

पतीता

0.020

205

कुडापासी

70

423

बनिबहारी सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.160

206

कुडापासी

70

424

बनिबहारी सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा…

पतीता

0.027

207

कुडापासी

114/27

425

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.056

208

कुडापासी

114/27

426

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.162

209

कुडापासी

12

427

कुलमिण नायक सुपुP बैरागी नायक

तैला

0.149

210

कुडापासी

114/33

428

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.035

211

कुडापासी

114/33

429

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.032

212

कुडापासी

53

430

पतीतापाबन नायक सुपुP जयकृ†णा

नायक

तैला

0.064

213

कुडापासी

12

431

कुलमिण नायक सुपुP बैरागी नायक

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.062

214

कुडापासी

12

432

कुलमिण नायक सुपुP बैरागी नायक

तैला

0.053

215

कुडापासी

114/48

434

धीरे सा… सुपुP पबीतरा सा…

तैला

0.018

216

कुडापासी

114/50

435

दीप सा… सुपुP जयकृ†णा सा…

तैला

0.037

217

कुडापासी

71

437

बनिबहारी सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और

अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.355

218

कुडापासी

71

438

बनिबहारी सा… सुपुP मगुनी सा… और

अ य

तैला

0.065

219

कुडापासी

114/48

439

धीरे सा… सुपुP पबीतरा सा…

तैला

0.056

220

कुडापासी

114/48

440

धीरे सा… सुपुP पबीतरा सा…

तैला

0.036

221

कुडापासी

114/50

441

दीप सा… सुपुP जयकृ†णा सा…

तैला

0.070

222

कुडापासी

114/49

442

िखतीस च सा… सुपुP जयकृ†णा सा…

तैला

0.032

223

कुडापासी

114/49

443

िखतीस च सा… सुपुP जयकृ†णा सा…

तैला

0.023

224

कुडापासी

114/49

444

िखतीस च सा… सुपुP जयकृ†णा सा…

तैला

0.045

225

कुडापासी

114/49

445

िखतीस च सा… सुपुP जयकृ†णा सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.029

226

कुडापासी

114/45

446

मनगोTवदा सा… सुपुP दुरजयाधन सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.041

2616

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(4) Rाम – कुडापासी

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )

s.

सं.

आर.I सeकल/

Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर

मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

227

कुडापासी

109

447

सुिखला सा… सुपुP बैरा सा… और अ य

तैला

0.023

228

कुडापासी

109

448

सुिखला सा… सुपुP बैरा सा… और अ य

तैला

0.025

229

कुडापासी

109

449

सुिखला सा… सुपुP बैरा सा… और अ य

तैला

0.015

230

कुडापासी

109

450

सुिखला सा… सुपुP बैरा सा… और अ य

तैला

0.021

231

कुडापासी

43

452

नीलामिण सा… सुपुP ह$र सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.041

232

कुडापासी

43

453

नीलामिण सा… सुपुP ह$र सा…

तैला

0.018

233

कुडापासी

114/43

454

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरन

सा…

तैला

0.050

234

कुडापासी

114/43

499

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरन

सा…

तैला

0.018

235

कुडापासी

108

500

सुकांती नायक पB नी चैत य नायक

तैला

0.141

236

कुडापासी

114/43

501

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.022

237

कुडापासी

114/43

502

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.037

238

कुडापासी

114/43

503

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.053

239

कुडापासी

24

504

चैत य नायक सुपुP बै‰व नायक और

अ य

तैला

0.061

240

कुडापासी

114/43

505

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.058

241

कुडापासी

114/43

506

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.040

242

कुडापासी

114/43

507

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.072

243

कुडापासी

52

531

पथानी सा… सुपुP एकादुसई सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.050

244

कुडापासी

52

532

पथानी सा… सुपुP एकादुसई सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.077

245

कुडापासी

52

533

पथानी सा… सुपुP एकादुसई सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.014

246

कुडापासी

52

534

पथानी सा… सुपुP एकादुसई सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.062

247

कुडापासी

52

535

पथानी सा… सुपुP एकादुसई सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.103

248

कुडापासी

52

536

पथानी सा… सुपुP एकादुसई सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.119

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2617

(4) Rाम – कुडापासी

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )

s.

सं.

आर.I सeकल/

Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर

मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

249

कुडापासी

52

537

पथानी सा… सुपुP एकादुसई सा…

पतीता

0.025

250

कुडापासी

114/48

538

धीरे सा… सुपुP पबीतरा सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.025

251

कुडापासी

114/45

539

मनगोTवदा सा… सुपुP दुरजयाधना

सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.070

252

कुडापासी

50

540

पंचू सा… सुपुP गंगाधर सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.039

253

कुडापासी

77

541

बीरा सा… सुपुP गंगा सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.018

254

कुडापासी

77

542

बीरा सा… सुपुP गंगा सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.018

255

कुडापासी

77

543

बीरा सा… सुपुP गंगा सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.009

256

कुडापासी

50

544

पंचू सा… सुपुP गंगाधर सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.011

257

कुडापासी

95

545

लŒमी सा… सुपुPी कातु सा… और

अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.012

258

कुडापासी

50

546

पंचू सा… सुपुP गंगाधर सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.015

259

कुडापासी

50

547

पंचू सा… सुपुP गंगाधर सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.012

260

कुडापासी

95

548

लŒमी सा… सुपुPी कातु सा… और

अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.022

261

कुडापासी

95

549

लŒमी सा… सुपुPी कातु सा… और

अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.022

262

कुडापासी

50

550

पंचू सा… सुपुP गंगाधर सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.084

263

कुडापासी

77

551

बीरा सा… सुपुP गंगा सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.081

264

कुडापासी

114

552

हादी सा… सुपुP गंगाधर सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.027

265

कुडापासी

50

553

पंचू सा… सुपुP गंगाधर सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.035

266

कुडापासी

114/26

554

धबई सा… सुपुP हादीबंधु सा… और

अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.020

267

कुडापासी

61

555

परदेसी माझी सुपुP िनमई माझी और

अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.094

2618

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(4) Rाम – कुडापासी

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )

s.

सं.

आर.I सeकल/

Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर

मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

268

कुडापासी

77

556

बीरा सा… सुपुP गंगा सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.097

269

कुडापासी

114

557

हादी सा… सुपुP गंगाधर सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.132

270

कुडापासी

77

558

बीरा सा… सुपुP गंगा सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.044

271

कुडापासी

114

559

हादी सा… सुपुP गंगाधर सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.013

272

कुडापासी

114

560

हादी सा… सुपुP गंगाधर सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.027

273

कुडापासी

61

561

परदेसी माझी सुपुP िनमई माझी और

अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.041

274

कुडापासी

114

562

हादी सा… सुपुP गंगाधर सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.036

275

कुडापासी

77

563

बीरा सा… सुपुP गंगा सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.034

276

कुडापासी

114

564

हादी सा… सुपुP गंगाधर सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.046

277

कुडापासी

77

565

बीरा सा… सुपुP गंगा सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.094

278

कुडापासी

50

566

पांचू सा… सुपुP गंगाधर सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.077

279

कुडापासी

50

567

पांचू सा… सुपुP गंगाधर सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.060

280

कुडापासी

50

568

पांचू सा… सुपुP गंगाधर सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.016

281

कुडापासी

50

569

पांचू सा… सुपुP गंगाधर सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.016

282

कुडापासी

50

570

पांचू सा… सुपुP गंगाधर सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.011

283

कुडापासी

50

571

पांचू सा… सुपुP गंगाधर सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.021

284

कुडापासी

95

572

लŒमी सा… सुपुPी कतु सा… अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.032

285

कुडापासी

95

573

लŒमी सा… सुपुPी कतु सा… अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.016

286

कुडापासी

114/26

574

धुबई सा… सुपुP हादीबंधु सा… और

अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.020

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2619

(4) Rाम – कुडापासी

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )

s.

सं.

आर.I सeकल/

Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर

मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

287

कुडापासी

95

575

लŒमी सा… सुपुPी कतु सा… अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.036

288

कुडापासी

95

576

लŒमी सा… सुपुPी कतु सा… अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.122

289

कुडापासी

95

577

लŒमी सा… सुपुPी कतु सा… अ य

पतीता

0.007

290

कुडापासी

80

582

बैरागी सा… सुपुP बुिधया सा… और

अ य

तैला

0.055

291

कुडापासी

80

583

बैरागी सा… सुपुP बुिधया सा… और

अ य

पतीता

0.036

292

कुडापासी

80

584

बैरागी सा… सुपुP बुिधया सा… और

अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.148

293

कुडापासी

80

585

बैरागी सा… सुपुP बुिधया सा… और

अ य

तैला

0.027

294

कुडापासी

80

586

बैरागी सा… सुपुP बुिधया सा… और

अ य

तैला

0.031

295

कुडापासी

80

587

बैरागी सा… सुपुP बुिधया सा… और

अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.035

296

कुडापासी

17

594

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.052

297

कुडापासी

4

595

इ सा… सुपुP भगवान सा…

तैला

0.025

298

कुडापासी

4

596

इ सा… सुपुP भगवान सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.053

299

कुडापासी

4

597

इ सा… सुपुP भगवान सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.059

300

कुडापासी

4

598

इ सा… सुपुP भगवान सा…

तैला

0.048

301

कुडापासी

17

599

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा…

तैला

0.091

302

कुडापासी

17

606

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.058

303

कुडापासी

17

607

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा…

तैला

0.039

304

कुडापासी

4

616

इ ा सा… सुपुP भगवान सा…

तैला

0.040

305

कुडापासी

17

617

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा…

तैला

0.031

306

कुडापासी

22

618

च सा… सुपुP भगबान सा…

तैला

0.031

307

कुडापासी

22

619

च सा… सुपुP भगबान सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.072

308

कुडापासी

22

620

च सा… सुपुP भगबान सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.034

309

कुडापासी

114

621

हादी सा… सुपुP गंगाधर सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.090

2620

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(4) Rाम – कुडापासी

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )

s.

सं.

आर.I सeकल/

Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर

मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

310

कुडापासी

17

622

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा…

तैला

0.093

311

कुडापासी

4

623

इ ा सा… सुपुP भगवान सा…

तैला

0.072

312

कुडापासी

22

624

च सा… सुपुP भगबान सा…

तैला

0.018

313

कुडापासी

22

625

च सा… सुपुP भगबान सा…

तैला

0.019

314

कुडापासी

17

626

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा…

तैला

0.022

315

कुडापासी

17

627

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा…

तैला

0.030

316

कुडापासी

4

628

इ सा… सुपुP भगवान सा…

तैला

0.022

317

कुडापासी

18

629

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा… और अ य

तैला

0.049

318

कुडापासी

18

630

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा… और अ य

तैला

0.018

319

कुडापासी

18

632

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा… और अ य

तैला

0.045

320

कुडापासी

33

633

दुखई सा… सुपुP महान सा…

तैला

0.072

321

कुडापासी

65

637

पलूनी सा… पB नी मोहन सा…

तैला

0.119

322

कुडापासी

18

638

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा… और अ य

तैला

0.035

323

कुडापासी

18

639

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा… और अ य

तैला

0.066

324

कुडापासी

18

640

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा… और अ य

तैला

0.064

325

कुडापासी

18

641

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा… और अ य

तैला

0.070

326

कुडापासी

18

642

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा… और अ य

तैला

0.011

327

कुडापासी

18

643

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा… और अ य

तैला

0.012

328

कुडापासी

18

644

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा… और अ य

तैला

0.011

329

कुडापासी

18

645

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा… और अ य

तैला

0.008

330

कुडापासी

18

646

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा… और अ य

तैला

0.028

331

कुडापासी

18

647

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा… और अ य

तैला

0.013

332

कुडापासी

18

648

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा… और अ य

तैला

0.025

333

कुडापासी

18

649

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा… और अ य

तैला

0.031

334

कुडापासी

18

650

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा… और अ य

तैला

0.059

335

कुडापासी

18

651

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा… और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.042

336

कुडापासी

18

652

िखरा सा… सुपुP रघु सा… और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.043

337

कुडापासी

65

659

पलूनी सा… पB नी मोहन सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.127

338

कुडापासी

65

660

पलूनी सा… पB नी मोहन सा…

तैला

0.097

339

कुडापासी

33

661

दुखई सा… सुपुP मोहन सा…

तैला

0.109

340

कुडापासी

113

671

ह$र माझी सुपुP दुआरी माझी

पतीता

0.042

341

कुडापासी

113

672

ह$र माझी सुपुP दुआरी माझी

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.040

342

कुडापासी

64

674

हलाद सा… सुपुP पांचू सा…

तैला

0.445

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2621

(4) Rाम – कुडापासी

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )

s.

सं.

आर.I सeकल/

Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर

मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

343

कुडापासी

114/82

675

सुरे च माली सुपुP नीलय माली

तैला

0.167

344

कुडापासी

32

676

दहाना नायक सुपुP च दल नायक

तैला

0.387

345

कुडापासी

92

682

रासानंदा सा… सुपुP बुधई माझी और

अ य

तैला

0.090

346

कुडापासी

113

686

ह$र माझी सुपुP दुआरी माझी

तैला

0.115

347

कुडापासी

113

688

ह$र माझी सुपुP दुआरी माझी

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.174

348

कुडापासी

113

689

ह$र माझी सुपुP दुआरी माझी

तैला

0.020

349

कुडापासी

78

692

बुधई सा… सुपुP आनंद सा…

तैला

0.001

350

कुडापासी

4

738

इ सा… सुपुP भगवान सा…

तैला

0.023

351

कुडापासी

22

739

च सा… सुपुP भगवान सा…

तैला

0.031

352

कुडापासी

15

955

के€ब सा… सुपुP जगई सा- और अ य

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.011

353

कुडापासी

114/31

956

भागीरथी बहेरा सुपुP नाबाघाना

बहेरा

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.001

354

कुडापासी

97

1227

लोचन सा… सुपुP जाडु सा…

तैला

0.184

355

कुडापासी

53

1233

पतीतापबन नायक सुपुP जयकृ†णा

नायक

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.040

356

कुडापासी

103

1234

zीिनबास नायक सुपुP बालक नायक

तैला

0.247

357

कुडापासी

114/33

1235

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.337

358

कुडापासी

1

1236

अिभराम नायक सुपुP बालक नायक

तैला

0.241

359

कुडापासी

114/71

1237

िवनय कुमार बहेरा सुपुP सुशांत कुमार

बहेरा और अ य

तैला

0.320

360

कुडापासी

114/25

1238

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.161

361

कुडापासी

67

1239

िपताJबर नायक सुपुP बालक नायक

तैला

0.147

362

कुडापासी

67

1240

िपताJबर नायक सुपुP बालक नायक

तैला

0.102

363

कुडापासी

67

1243

िपताJबर नायक सुपुP बालक नायक

तैला

0.015

364

कुडापासी

114/84

1244

सBयभामा सेठी पŠी घन€याम सेठी

तैला

0.082

365

कुडापासी

1

1246

अिभराम नायक सुपुP बालक नायक

तैला

0.132

366

कुडापासी

1

1247

अिभराम नायक सुपुP बालक नायक

तैला

0.031

367

कुडापासी

1

1248

अिभराम नायक सुपुP बालक नायक

तैला

0.230

368

कुडापासी

5

1249

उछाबा नायक सुपुP बालक नायक और

अ य

तैला

0.158

369

कुडापासी

114/41

1250

चैत य नायक सुपुP बैशनब नायक

तैला

0.088

370

कुडापासी

5

1251

उछाबा नायक सुपुP बालक नायक और

तैला

0.075

2622

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(4) Rाम – कुडापासी

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )

s.

सं.

आर.I सeकल/

Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर

मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

अ य

371

कुडापासी

114/18

1253

मनोरंजन नायक सुपुP चैत य नायक

तैला

0.091

372

कुडापासी

114/33

1254

zीमांता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरन

सा…

तैला

0.036

373

कुडापासी

114/33

1255

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.057

374

कुडापासी

114/33

1256

zीमांता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरन

सा…

तैला

0.193

375

कुडापासी

13

1258

के€बा सा… सुपुP कुंगई सा…

तैला

0.206

376

कुडापासी

89

1259

रमेश सा… सुपुP नबई सा…

तैला

0.074

377

कुडापासी

89

1260

रमेश सा… सुपुP नबई सा…

तैला

0.094

378

कुडापासी

40

1261

नालू सा… सुपुP बौरी सा…

तैला

0.164

379

कुडापासी

114/29

1262

जोगे मिलक सुपुP नरो(म मिलक

तैला

0.350

380

कुडापासी

114/69

1263

दुगाG चरन नायक सुपुP पतीतापावन

नायक

घाराबड़ी

0.025

381

कुडापासी

93

1265

राम सेथे सुपुP दुखु सेथे

घाराबड़ी

0.020

382

कुडापासी

63

1266

हलाद माझी सुपुP बौरी माझी

घाराबड़ी

0.022

383

कुडापासी

86

1268

भोलेˆर सा… सुपुP बंगुv सा…

घाराबड़ी

0.020

384

कुडापासी

42

1269

िनरंजन माझी सुपुP बीरा सा…

घाराबड़ी

0.017

385

कुडापासी

41

1271

िनमई माझी सुपुP ठाका माझी

घाराबड़ी

0.020

386

कुडापासी

114/77

1272

बलभ च धान सुपुP हधर धान

घाराबड़ी

0.019

387

कुडापासी

6

1274

कातु बाघा सुपुP कमार बाघा

घाराबड़ी

0.015

388

कुडापासी

96

1275

लŒमण सा… सुपुP पांछू सा…

घाराबड़ी

0.018

389

कुडापासी

90

1277

रमेश नायक सुपुP कािलया नायक

घाराबड़ी

0.017

390

कुडापासी

35

1282

दोलागोTवदा सा… सुपुP नेबई सा…

घाराबड़ी

0.020

391

कुडापासी

89

1284

रमेश सा… सुपुP नबई सा…

घाराबड़ी

0.019

392

कुडापासी

114/22

1286

पंचाली बा$रक पB नी भात करण

बा$रक

घाराबड़ी

0.015

393

कुडापासी

114/37

1288

कौ€या बहेरा पŠी सुजीत बहेरा

घाराबड़ी

0.016

394

कुडापासी

55

1291

पािबPा सा… सुपुP पथानी सा…

घाराबड़ी

0.014

395

कुडापासी

34

1293

दुरजु सा… सुपुP पथारनी सा…

घाराबड़ी

0.012

396

कुडापासी

98

1295

सरबेˆर मतैरी सुपुP लŒमी धन मतैरी

घाराबड़ी

0.021

397

कुडापासी

112

1297

सुशांत धान सुपुP िनमई धान और

अ य

घाराबड़ी

0.018

398

कुडापासी

114/6

1300

िचत या नायक सुपुP िव‰बा नायक

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.123

399

कुडापासी

114/7

1301

िखरोदा कुमार महाराना सुपुP जतैया

तैला

0.081

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2623

(4) Rाम – कुडापासी

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )

s.

सं.

आर.I सeकल/

Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर

मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

महाराना

400

कुडापासी

114/8

1302

पंचाली बा$रक पB नी भात करन

बा$रक

तैला

0.061

401

कुडापासी

114/41

1303

चैत य नायक सुपुP बै‰ब नायक

तैला

0.090

402

कुडापासी

114/11

1304

धमाGपाड़ा सा… सुपुP पांचू सा…

तैला

0.138

403

कुडापासी

114/11

1305

धमाGपाड़ा सा… सुपुP पांचू सा…

तैला

0.114

404

कुडापासी

114/12

1306

पतीतापाबन नायक सुपुP जयकृ†णा

नायक

तैला

0.081

405

कुडापासी

114/13

1307

मनमोहन सा… सुपुP सुकv सा…

तैला

0.057

406

कुडापासी

114/16

1308

हादीबंधु सा… सुपुP इकदुिसया सा…

तैला

0.045

407

कुडापासी

114/33

1309

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.231

408

कुडापासी

114/30

1314

िब‰बा राउता सुपुP पूणाG च राउता

तैला

0.093

409

कुडापासी

114/33

1316

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.164

410

कुडापासी

114/33

1317

zीमंता कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.129

411

कुडापासी

114/30

1318

िव‰बा राउता सुपुP पूणाG च राउता

तैला

0.201

412

कुडापासी

114/34

1319

मीला नायक सुपुP क#तGन नायक

तैला

0.237

413

कुडापासी

114/38

1320

िबनोद कुमार सा… सुपुP मधुसुदन सा…

तैला

0.090

414

कुडापासी

114/19

1321

गनया रंजन नायक सुपुP िचत या

नायक

तैला

0.158

415

कुडापासी

114/39

1322

आलोक कुमार सा… सुपुP v मोहन

सा…

तैला

0.066

416

कुडापासी

114/45

1324

मनगोTवदा सा… सुपुP दुरजयाधना

सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.036

417

कुडापासी

114/46

1325

नारायण सा… सुपुP णाबंधु सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.049

418

कुडापासी

114/46

1326

नारायण सा… सुपुP णाबंधु सा…

तैला

0.017

419

कुडापासी

114/47

1327

िसबरामा सा… सुपुP पबीPा सा…

तैला

0.010

420

कुडापासी

114/47

1328

िसबरामा सा… सुपुP पबीPा सा…

तैला

0.005

421

कुडापासी

114/51

1329

ससिमतरानी धान पŠी उमाकांत

माझी

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.184

422

कुडापासी

114/53

1330

र€मीता सा… पŠी दीप कुमार धान

तैला

0.074

423

कुडापासी

114/54

1331

अिजत कुमार दे-री सुपुP दुयiधन

दे-री

तैला

0.045

424

कुडापासी

114/57

1333

िपताबस सा… सुपुP गौरा सा…

तैला

0.049

2624

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(4) Rाम – कुडापासी

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )

s.

सं.

आर.I सeकल/

Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर

मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

425

कुडापासी

114/58

1334

सारथी सा… सुपुP गौरा सा…

तैला

0.046

426

कुडापासी

114/59

1335

zीिनबास सा… सुपुP गौरा सा…

तैला

0.048

427

कुडापासी

114/60

1336

सुरथ सा… सुपुP गौरा सा…

तैला

0.038

428

कुडापासी

114/61

1337

राकेश रंजन रऊता सुपुP फूल कुमार

रऊता

तैला

0.101

429

कुडापासी

114/63

1338

राजकशोर दे-री सुपुP महेˆर दे-री

तैला

0.159

430

कुडापासी

114/81

1339

शांत कुमार सा… सुपुP नेPनंदा सा…

तैला

0.120

431

कुडापासी

114/64

1340

संतवोना िमzा पB नी नरे कुमार

िमzा

तैला

0.048

432

कुडापासी

114/66

1341

देबा सा… सुपुP बुधई सा…

तैला

0.056

433

कुडापासी

114/66

1342

देबा सा… सुपुP बुधई सा…

तैला

0.018

434

कुडापासी

114/66

1343

देबा सा… सुपुP बुधई सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.060

435

कुडापासी

114/67

1344

िचनमया कुमार बहेरा सुपुP सुशांत

कुमार बहेरा

तैला

0.159

436

कुडापासी

114/68

1345

िबनय कुमार बहेरा सुपुP सुशांत कुमार

बहेरा

तैला

0.119

437

कुडापासी

114/68

1346

िबनय कुमार बहेरा सुपुP सुशांत कुमार

बहेरा

तैला

0.014

438

कुडापासी

114/68

1347

िबनय कुमार बहेरा सुपुP सुशांत कुमार

बहेरा

तैला

0.067

439

कुडापासी

114/70

1348

सुशांत कुमार सा… सुपुP v मोहन

सा…

तैला

0.035

440

कुडापासी

114/39

1349

आलोक कुमार सा… सुपुP v मोहन

सा…

तैला

0.042

441

कुडापासी

114/73

1350

सरोिजनी नायक पB नी अजया नायक

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.015

442

कुडापासी

114/74

1351

ितकान सा… सुपुP दुजयाधन सा…

तैला

0.111

443

कुडापासी

114/75

1352

टूना बहेरा सुपुP काश बहेरा

तैला

0.096

444

कुडापासी

114/76

1353

िबनय कुमार बहेरा सुपुP सुसांत कुमार

बहेरा और अ य

तैला

0.385

445

कुडापासी

114/78

1354

अvण धान सुपुP मोहन धान

तैला

0.105

446

कुडापासी

114/85

1356

कvणाकर महापाPा सुपुP च मिण

महापाPा

तैला

0.097

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2625

(4) Rाम – कुडापासी

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )

s.

सं.

आर.I सeकल/

Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर

मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

447

कुडापासी

84

1357

भागीरथी माझी सुपुP बीरा माझी और

अ य

घाराबड़ी

0.011

448

कुडापासी

114/87

1358

सBये धान सुपुP घन€याम धान

और अ य

तैला

0.125

449

कुडापासी

114/88

1359

उधाब सा… और नरौ(म सा…

सारदा अंजलासािचता

ितनी

0.009

450

कुडापासी

114/89

1360

रंजन बहेरा सुपुP रमेश बहेरा

तैला

0.036

451

कुडापासी

114/90

1361

रजत कुमार बहेरा सुपुP रमेश बहेरा

तैला

0.035

जोड़ :

$ाम

$ाम

$ाम

$ाम – कुडापासी

कुडापासी

कुडापासी

कुडापासी

42.488

42.488

42.488

42.488

(5) Rाम – धौराखमान

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी)

s.

सं.

आर.I सeकल/ Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

1

धौराखमान

11

5

घुvदु सा… सुपुP बुटु सा…

तैला

0.441

2

धौराखमान

43

10

सुदई सेठी सुपुP नंदा सेठी

तैला

0.237

3

धौराखमान

43

11

सुदई सेठी सुपुP नंदा सेठी

तैला

0.340

4

धौराखमान

43

12

सुदई सेठी सुपुP नंदा सेठी

तैला

0.194

5

धौराखमान

45/17

13

मानस रंजन वैन सुपुP हलाद वैन

तैला

0.771

6

धौराखमान

45/12

15

Rाम कJयूिनटी भूिम अ4यO,

हमनिबल के नाम

तैला

0.748

7

धौराखमान

8

16

कतूरी सा… सुपुP अरिखता दे-री

और अ य

तैला

0.071

8

धौराखमान

45/19

17

बैसनाबा राउत सुपुP पूणG च राउत

तैला

0.149

2626

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(5) Rाम – धौराखमान

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी)

s.

सं.

आर.I सeकल/ Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

9

धौराखमान

45/19

18

बैसनाबा राउत सुपुP पूणG च राउत

तैला

0.121

10

धौराखमान

45/42

20

सुदशGन दे-री सुपुP दांगी दे-री

तैला

0.375

11

धौराखमान

24

21

बालकृ†णा सा… सुपुP भागबत सा…

और अ य

तैला

0.358

12

धौराखमान

28

40

बैरागी सा… सुपुPी सबर सा…

तैला

0.479

13

धौराखमान

24

53

बालकृ†ण सा… सुपुP भागबत सा…

और अ य

तैला

1.637

14

धौराखमान

45/12

54

Rाम कJयूिनटी भूिम अ4यO,

हमनिबल के नाम

तैला

0.022

15

धौराखमान

45/17

84

मानस रंजन वैन सुपुP हलाद वैन

तैला

0.267

16

धौराखमान

35

85

िमलू बहेरा सुपुP हधर बहेरा

तैला

0.072

17

धौराखमान

45/45

86

फुल कुमार सेठी सुपुP बौरी बंधु

सेठी

तैला

0.101

18

धौराखमान

45/41

87

िवनय कुमार बहेरा सुपुP सुशांत

कुमार बहेरा और अ य

तैला

0.307

19

धौराखमान

45/12

92

Rाम कJयूिनटी भूिम अ4यO,

हमनिबल के नाम

तैला

0.622

20

धौराखमान

45/12

93

Rाम कJयूिनटी भूिम अ4यO,

हमनिबल के नाम

तैला

0.065

21

धौराखमान

2

94

अंतरयामी सा… सुपुP धानी सा…

तैला

0.079

22

धौराखमान

20

98

पुिनया सा… सुपुPी दामबुv सा…

तैला

0.136

23

धौराखमान

22

99

बौरीबंधु दे-री सुपुP पानू दे-री

तैला

0.101

24

धौराखमान

20

103

पुिनया सा… सुपुPी दमबुv सा…

तैला

0.170

25

धौराखमान

45/17

104

मानव रंजन वैन सुपुP हलाद वैन

तैला

0.245

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2627

(5) Rाम – धौराखमान

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी)

s.

सं.

आर.I सeकल/ Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

26

धौराखमान

45/50

105

िव€ नु बेहरा सुपुP दीनबंधु बहेरा

तैला

0.039

27

धौराखमान

14

224

जयकृ†णा धान सुपुP दैतरी धान

सारदा

जलसािचता

एक फसली

0.153

28

धौराखमान

45/2

563

भागीरती सा… सुपुP नेपाला सा… और

अ य

तैला

0.037

29

धौराखमान

45/3

566

परनाती बा$रक पB नी नारायण बा$रक

तैला

0.096

30

धौराखमान

45/4

567

पावतM बा$रक पB नी अŒय कुमार

बा$रक

तैला

0.036

31

धौराखमान

45/8

571

पवGत करन बा$रक सुपुP अनुकूल

बा$रक

तैला

0.036

32

धौराखमान

45/11

574

पंचाली बा$रक पB नी पवGत करन

बा$रक

तैला

0.026

33

धौराखमान

45/12

575

Rाम क# कJयूिनटी भूिम अ4यO,

हमनिबल के नाम

तैला

0.347

34

धौराखमान

45/12

578

Rाम कJयूिनटी भूिम अ4यO,

हमनिबल के नाम

तैला

0.521

35

धौराखमान

45/12

579

Rाम कJयूिनटी भूिम अ4यO,

हमनिबल के नाम

तैला

0.129

36

धौराखमान

45/13

580

िबनोदनी राऊता पŠी िव‰ाबा

राऊता

तैला

0.151

37

धौराखमान

45/14

581

बसंत कुमार सा… सुपुP िब4याधर सा…

तैला

0.049

38

धौराखमान

45/15

582

ितकली बेहरा पB नी दामबाv बहेरा

तैला

0.142

39

धौराखमान

45/17

584

मानस रंजन वैन सुपुP हलाद वैन

तैला

0.343

40

धौराखमान

45/19

587

बैसनाबा राऊत सुपुP पूणG च राऊत

तैला

0.120

41

धौराखमान

45/21

588

Rाम कJयूिनटी भूिम अ4यO,

हमनिबल के नाम

तैला

0.595

42

धौराखमान

45/23

589

zीमंत कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.102

43

धौराखमान

45/23

590

zीमंत कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.194

44

धौराखमान

45/23

591

zीमंत कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

तैला

0.101

2628

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(5) Rाम – धौराखमान

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी)

s.

सं.

आर.I सeकल/ Rाम

खाता

सं!या

5लाट

सं!या

का€तकारी का नाम

कम

प$रयोजना के

िलए अपेिOत

OेP (हेWटेयर मH)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

सा…

45

धौराखमान

45/23

592

zीमंत कुमार सा… सुपुP िब‰ु चरण

सा…

तैला

0.194

46

धौराखमान

45/29

598

दीप दु कुमार धान सुपुP जडुमिण

धान

तैला

0.114

47

धौराखमान

45/31

600

धीरे कुमार सा… सुपुP भाक सा…

और अ य

तैला

0.440

48

धौराखमान

45/49

612

दीपितरनी बा$रक पB नी बvण कुमार

बा$रक

तैला

0.024

जोड़

जोड़

जोड़

जोड़ : : : :

$ाम

$ाम

$ाम

$ाम – धौराखमान

धौराखमान

धौराखमान

धौराखमान

12.099

12.099

12.099

12.099

सीमा

सीमा

सीमा

सीमा-िववरण

िववरण

िववरण

िववरण: : : :

नैनी कोयला लॉक क सीमा बदु संया 1 से शु होती है, जो "टेट हाईवे संया 63 के (कनारे और गौदूनी नाला के दि.णी

(कनारे पर ि"थत है। जहां से सीमा बदु संया -29 तक जाने के िलए "टेट हाइवे संया 63 (अंगुल टाउन क ओर) के साथ

दि.ण-पूव; (दशा म< आगे बढ़ती है। बदु संया 29 से बदु संया 136 तक सीमा बाएं मुड़के उ@र-पूव; (दशा क ओर बढ़ती

है, और छ<ड़ीपड़ा आरि.त वन पर चलती Cई बदु संया 136 तक पCँचती है । बदु संया 136 से बदु संया ‘क’ तक सीमा

उ@र-पूव; क ओर मुड़के गाँव त<तुलोइ गोपीनाथपुर होकर आगे सवE नंबर 195, 194, 193, 201, 200 से होकर गुजरती है।

बदु संया ए से बदु संया सी तक सीमा उ@र-पूव; क ओर मुड़के गाँव कसीडीहा होकर आगे सवE नंबर 36, 34, 33,

3092, 32, 30, 24, 23, 20, 17 से होकर गुजरती है । बदु संया ‘ग’ से बदु संया ‘ड.’ तक सीमा आगे बढ़ कर उ@र-

पूव; क (दशा म< गाँव थलीपिस से होकर गुज़रती है, जो सवE नंबर 20, 19, 18, 66, 68, 64, 63, 52, 119, 120, 229,

233, 234, 237, 238, 241, 242, 245, 247, 250, 437, 436, 432, 433, 434, 449, 471, 472, 476, 561,

551, 552, 553, 550, 548, 547, 546 से होकर गुज़रती है । बदु संया ‘ड.’ से बदु संया ‘झ’ तक सीमा आगे बढ़ कर

उ@र-पूव; क (दशा म< गाँव कुदापसी से होकर गुज़रती है, जो सवE नंबर 678, 679, 680, 681, 682, 685, 686, 687,

689, 692, 691, 635, 634, 633, 632, 631, 737, 741, 769, 809, 807, 802, 803, 797, 796, 795, 784,

955, 956, 531, 530, 529, 527, 523, 499, 500, 492, 467, 1224, 462, 461 से होकर गुज़रती है । बदु संया

‘झ’ से बदु संया 30 तक सीमा आगे बढ़ कर उ@र-पूव; क (दशा म< गाँव धौराखमान से होकर गुज़रती है, जो सवE नंबर

222, 223, 224, 226, 225, 213, 226, 257, 256, 255, 260, 268, 269 से होकर गुज़रती है । बदु संया 30 से

बदु संया 31 तक सीमा बायL क ओर मुड़के उ@र-पिMम (दशा म< जाती है, जो (क धौराखमान से होकर गुजरती है जो सवE

नंबर 269, 268, 270, 266, 265, 262, 181, 180, 178, 179, 176, 105, 566, 567, 102, 85, 84, 54, 53, 21,

20 से होकर गुज़रती है और छ<ड़ीपड़ा आरि.त वन सीमा पर बदु संया 31 को छूती है। बदु संया 31 से लेकर बदु

संया 35 तक सीमा उ@र-पिMम (दशा म< आगे बढ़ कर छ<दीपादा आरि.त वन पर ि"थत बदु संया 35 से िमलती है । बदु

संया 35 से बदु संया 1 तक क सीमा बायL ओर मुड़के दि.ण-पिMम (दशा म< गौदुनी नाला के दि.ण (कनारे से धारा के

साथ बदु संया 1 से िमलती है जहां से सीमा शु Cई थी।

(1) Oाम: ततुलोई गोपीनाथपुर : सीमा बदु संया -136, ‘क’ और ‘ख’ से िघरी है।

Oाम क सीमा बदु संया -136 से शु होती है, जो (क िQकोणीय जंRशन बदु के पास ि"थत है और सवE नंबर 195 पर

छ<ड़ीपड़ा आरि.त वन सीमा और लॉक सीमा को छूती है। बदु संया -136 से बदु संया ‘क’ तक, लॉक सीमा उ@र पूव;

(दशा म< गाँव त<तुलोइ गोपीनाथपुर से होते Cए सवE नंबर -195, 194, 193, 201, 200 से गुजर कर सवE नंबर -200 पर

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2629

उ@र पूवS छोर पर गाँव क सीमा को छूती है। बदु संया ‘क’ से बदु संया ‘ख’ तक गांव क सीमा सवE नंबर -200, 199,

195 से होकर जाती Cई बदु संया ‘ख’ पर छ<ड़ीपड़ा आरि.त वन सीमा को उ@र- पूव; (दशा म< छूती है। बदु संया ‘ख’ से

बदु संया -136 तक यह त<तुलोई गोपीनाथपुर गांव और छ<ड़ीपड़ा आरि.त वन के बीच सामाय सीमा है।

(2) Oाम: कासीडीहा : सीमा बदु संया ‘क’, ‘ग’, ‘घ’, और ‘ख’ से िघरी है।

Oाम क सीमा रेखा बदु संया ‘क’, जो (क सवE नंबर -36 और सवE नंबर 34 के िलए आम बदु पर ि"थत है, से शु होती

है। बदु संया ‘क’ से बदु संया ‘ग’ तक, लॉक सीमा उ@र-पूव; (दशा क ओर जाती है, जो कसीडीहा गाँव से होते Cए सवE

नंबर 36, 34, 33, 3092, 32, 30, 24, 23, 20, 17 को छूती Cई उ@र-पूव; क ओर गाँव क सीमा सवE नंबर 17 पर

समाU होती है। बदु संया ‘ग’ से बदु संया ‘घ’ तक गांव क सीमा सवE नंबर 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8,

7, 6, 3176, 5 को संवेिशत करते Cए उ@र-पिMम (दशा म< चली गई और िQकोणीय जंRशन बदु से गुजरती है, और सवE

नंबर 2, 1 के साथ आगे बढ़ कर छ<ड़ीपड़ा आरि.त वन सीमा को बदु संया ‘घ’ पर छूती है। बदु संया ‘घ’ से बदु संया

‘ख’ तक यह कसीडीहा गांव और छ<ड़ीपड़ा आरि.त वन के बीच आम सीमा है। बदु संया ‘ख’ से बदु संया ‘क’ तक क गांव

क सीमा दि.ण-पिMम (दशा म< सवE नंबर 1, 30, 31, 32, 36 को समावेश करती है और बदु संया ‘क’ पर सीमा बंद

होती है।

(3) Oाम : थलीपसी: सीमा बदु संया ‘ग’, ‘ड.’, ‘च’, ‘छ’, और ‘घ’ से िघरी है।

Oाम क सीमा रेखा बदु संया ‘ग’ से शु होती है, जो सवE नंबर 20 पर ि"थत है। बदु संया ‘ग’ से बदु संया ‘ड.’ तक,

लॉक सीमा उ@र-पूव; क (दशा म< गांव थलीपिस के बीच से सवE नंबर 20, 19, 18, 66, 68, 64, 63, 52, 119, 120,

229 , 233, 234, 237, 238, 241, 242, 245, 247, 250, 437, 436, 432, 433, 434, 449, 471, 472, 476,

561, 551, 552, 553, 550, 548, 547 और 546 से गुजरकर उ@र-पूव; (दशा म< गाँव क सीमा सवE नं 546 को छूती है ।

बदु संया ‘ड.’ से लेकर बदु संया ‘च’ तक, गाँव क सीमा उ@र-पिMम (दशा म< सवE नं 546, 545, 542, 541, 538,

537, 536, 533, 532, 531, 530, 528, 527, 526, 525, 524, 523 को संवेिशत करते Cए जाती है। बदु संया ‘च’

से बदु संया ‘छ’ तक गांव क सीमा सवE नंबर -510, 509, 498, 414, 413, 412, 411, 410, 409, 408, 407, 406,

403, 402, 401, 119, 96, 93, 89, 86, 85, और 1 को संवेिशत करते Cए पिMम (दशा म< बदु संया ‘छ’ पर छ<ड़ीपड़ा

आरि.त वन सीमा को छूती है। बदु संया ‘छ’ से बदु संया ‘घ’ तक यह थलीपिस गांव और छ<ड़ीपड़ा आरि.त वन के बीच

आम सीमा है। बदु संया ‘घ’ से बदु संया ‘ग’ तक गांव क सीमा दि.ण-पूव; (दशा म< सवE नंबर 1, 2, 3, 578, 577, 11,

15, 16, 17, 18, 20 को संवेिशत करते Cए बदु संया ‘ग’ पर बंद होती है।

(4) Oाम: िबVबाधरपुर : सीमा बदु संया ‘छ’, ‘च’, और ‘ज’ से िघरी है।

Oाम क सीमा रेखा बदु संया ‘छ’ से शु होती है जो िQकोणीय जंRशन बदु के करीब है और छ<दीपादा आरि.त वन सीमा

को छूती है। बदु संया ‘छ’ से बदु संया ‘च’ तक, गांव क सीमा सवE नंबर 1, 162, 163, 164, 195, 196, 197, 198,

199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 367, 368, 369, 370, 372, 373, 378, 379 को संवेिशत

करते Cए पूव; (दशा म< जाती है। बदु संया ‘च’ से बदु संया ‘ज’ तक गांव क सीमा सवE नंबर 387, 379, 378, 377,

376, 375, 364, िQकोणीय जंRशन बदु, 363, 362, 353, 415, 412, 352, 47, 44, 34, 392, 399, 33, 389, 430,

32, 19, 17, 4 को संवेिशत करते Cए उ@र -पिMम (दशा म< बदु संया ‘ज’ पर छ<दीपादा आरि.त वन सीमा को छूती है।

बदु संया ‘ज’ से बदु संया ‘छ’ तक यह िबVबाधरपुर गांव और छ<दीपादा आरि.त वन के बीच आम सीमा है, जो (क बदु

संया ‘छ’ पर बंद होती है।

(5) Oाम: कुडापासी: सीमा बदु संया ‘ड.’, ‘झ’, ‘ञ’, ‘ज’ और ‘च’ से िघरी है।

Oाम क सीमा रेखा बदु संया ‘ड.’ से शु होती है, जो (क सवE नंबर 678 पर िQकोणीय जंRशन बदु के करीब ि"थत है।

बदु संया ‘ड.’ से बदु संया ‘झ’ तक लॉक क सीमा उ@र-पूव; (दशा क ओर कुडापासी के बीच सवE नं 678, 679, 680,

681, 682, 685, 686, 687, 689, 692, 691, 635, 634, 633, 632, 631, 737, 741, 769, 809, 807, 802,

803, 797, 796, 795, 784, 955, 956, 531, 530, 529, 527, 523, 499, 500, 492, 467, 1224, 462, 461 के

मWय से गुजर कर जाती है। बदु संया ‘झ’ से बदु संया ‘ञ’ तक गाँव क सीमा उ@र-पिMम (दशा क ओर सवE नं 461,

िQकोणीय जंRशन बदु, 393, 392, 391, 390, 389, 388, 1318, 380, 379, 365, 364, िQकोणीय जंRशन बदु, 47,

46, 44, 1230, 1229, 1228, 27 को संवेिशत करते Cए छ<दीपादा आरि.त वन सीमा को बदु संया ‘ञ’ पर छूती है।

बदु संया ‘ञ’ से बदु संया एच तक यह कुडापासी गांव और छ<दीपादा आरि.त वन के बीच आम सीमा है। बदु संया ‘ज’

से बदु संया ‘च’ और बदु संया ‘ड.’, गाँव क सीमा दि.ण-पूव; (दशा म< सवE नंबर 1, 1316, 1234, 1235, 1353,

2630

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1236, 1237, 1, 2, 112, 113, 127, 134, 1351, िQकोणीय जंRशन बदु, 1351, 1307, 138, 1322, 139, 1223,

184, 185, िQकोणीय जंRशन बदु, 186, 188, 202, 1309, 204, 673, 676, 677, 678, को संवेिशत करते Cए बदु

संया ‘ड.’ पर बंद होती है।

(6) Oाम: धौराखमान: बदु संया ‘झ’, 30, 31 और ‘ञ’ से िघरी है।

Oाम क सीमा रेखा बदु संया ‘झ’ से शु होती है, जो (क सवE नंबर 222 पर ि"थत है। बदु संया ‘झ’ से बदु संया 30

तक लॉक क सीमा गाँव धौराखमान और सवE नंबर 222, 223, 224, 226, 225, 213, 226, 257, 256, 255, 260,

268, 269 से गुजर कर उ@र-पूव; (दशा क ओर जाती है। बदु संया 30 से बदु संया 31 तक लॉक सीमा सवE नंबर 269,

268, 270, 266, 265, 262, 181, 180, 178, 179, 176, 105, 566, 567, 102, 85, 84, 54, 53, 21, 20 को

संवेिशत करते Cए उ@र-पिMम (दशा म< छ<दीपादा आरि.त वन सीमा को बदु संया 31 पर छूती है। बदु संया 31 से बदु

संया ‘ञ’ तक, यह धौराखमान गांव और छ<दीपादा आरि.त वन के बीच आम सीमा है। बदु संया ‘ञ’ से बदु संया ‘झ’

तक, Oाम क सीमा सवE नंबर 1, 2, 4, 558, 551, 7, 553, 552, 553, 34, 35, 36, 37, िQकोणीय जंRशन बदु, 90,

91, 92, 95, 200, िQकोणीय जंRशन बदु, 201, 202, 203, 219, 220, 221, िQकोणीय जंRशन बदु, 222, को

संवेिशत करते Cए बदु संया ‘झ’ पर बंद होती है I

[फा. सं. 43015/18/2015-एलए एXड आईआर]

राम िशरोमिण सरोज, उप सिचव

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 655.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number

S.O. 1704 (E), dated the 10th May, 2016 issued under sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas

(Acquisitions and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), and

published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, part II, section 3, sub-section (ii), dated the 11th May, 2016,

the Central Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for coal in 912.7892 hectares (approximately)

or 2255.502 acres (approximately) of the lands in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that

notification and the said notice was extended for a further period of one year commencing from 10th May,

2018 vide notification number 1651(E), dated the 17th April, 2018;

And, whereas the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable in a part of the said lands

prescribed in the Schedule appended to this notification.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 7 of the said Act,

the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire the land measuring 912.799 hectares

(approximately) or 2255.575 acres (approximately) and all rights in or over the said lands described in the

schedule appended hereto.

Note 1: The plan bearing number SCCL/Naini Area/Notification/2018/1, dated the 28th December, 2018 of

the area covered by this notification may be inspected at the office of the General Manager, Naini Area, The

Singareni Collieries Company Limited ( A Government Company), H. No. 129 of NAC, Mishrapada,

District Angul -759122, Odisha or at the office of the Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata-700

001 or at the office of Collector and the District Magistrate, District Angul, Odisha.

Note 2 : Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of the section 8 of the said Act, relating to objection to

acquisition, which provides as follows:-

“8. (1) Any person interested in any land in respect of which a notification under section 7 has been issued,

may, within thirty days of the issue of the notification, object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the

land or of any rights in or over such land.

Explanation.- It shall not be an objection within the meaning of this section for any person to say that he

himself desires to undertake mining operations in the land for the production of coal and that such operations

should not be undertaken by the Central Government or by any other person.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2631

(2)

Every objection under sub-section (1) shall be made to the competent authority in writing, and the

competent authority shall give the objector an opportunity of being heard either in person or by a legal

practitioner and shall, after hearing all such objections and after making such further inquiry, if any, as he

thinks necessary, either make a report in respect of the land which has been notified under sub-section (1) of

section 7 or of rights in or over such land, or make different reports in respect of different parcels of such

land or of rights in or over such land, to the Central Government, containing his recommendations on the

objections, together with the record of the proceedings held by him, for the decision of that Government.

(3)

For the purposes of this section, a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be

entitled to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under

this Act.”

Note 3: The Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata 700001 has been appointed by the Central

Government as the competent authority under section 3 of the said Act, vide notification number

S.O.3347(E), dated the 9th December, 2015, published in part II, section 3, sub-section (ii) of the Gazette of

India, dated the 10th December, 2015.

SCHEDULE

THE SINGARENI COLLIERIES COMPANY LIMITED

Naini Opencast Project, Naini Area

District-Angul, Odisha

[ Plan bearing number SCCL/Naini Area/Notification/2018/1, dated the 28th December, 2018]

All Rights:

(I) Table

Sl.

No.

Name of

villages

Thana

Thana

number

District

Type of land in hectares

Total in

hectares

Total in

acres

Tenancy

Forest

Non-

Forest

Govt.

Remarks

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

(10)

(11)

1

Kasidiha

Chhendipada

95

Angul

0.961

9.805

0.750

11.516

28.457

Part

2

Tentuloi

gopinathapur

Chhendipada

94

Angul

-

1.461

0.654

2.115

5.226

Part

3

Thalipasi

Chhendipada

101

Angul

20.555

4.207

3.052

27.814

68.730

Part

4

Bimbadharapur

Chhendipada

102

Angul

35.724

51.101

8.873

95.698

236.475

Full

5

Kudapasi

Chhendipada

103

Angul

42.488

56.744

1.716

100.948

249.448

Part

6

Dhaurakhaman

Chhendipada

104

Angul

12.099

16.862

2.652

31.613

78.117

Part

7

Chhendipada

Reserve forest

Chhendipada

-

Angul

-

643.095

0.000

643.095

1589.122

Part

Total:

111.827

783.275

17.697

912.799

2255.575

Total : 912.799 hectares (approximately) or 2255.575 acres (approximately)

1. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Kasidiha :

1 to 16, 17(P), 20(P), 23(P), 24(P), 25 to 29, 30(P), 31, 32(P), 33(P), 34(P), 36(P), 3092(P), 3138, 3176.

2. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Tentuloi Gopinathpur :

193(P), 194(P), 195(P), 196 to 199, 200(P), 201(P).

3. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Thalipasi :

1 to 17, 18(P), 19(P), 20(P), 52(P), 53 to 62, 63(P), 64(P), 66(P), 67, 68(P), 69 to 118, 119(P), 120(P),

229(P), 233(P), 234(P), 235, 236, 237(P), 238(P), 239, 240, 241(P), 242(P), 243, 244, 245(P), 247(P), 250(P),

251 to 431, 432(P), 433(P), 434(P), 436(P), 437(P), 449(P), 471(P), 472(P), 473, 474, 475, 476(P), 477 to

545, 546(P), 547(P), 548(P), 549, 550(P), 551(P), 552(P), 553(P), 561(P), 565, 566, 568, 569, 570, 576, 577,

578, 579, 580, 581, 582, 583.

2632

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Bimbadharapur :

1 to 437.

5. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Kudapasi :

1 to 460, 461(P), 462(P), 463 to 466, 467(P), 492(P), 499(P), 500(P), 501 to 522, 523(P), 527(P), 528,

529(P), 530(P), 531(P), 532 to 630, 631(P), 632(P), 633(P), 634(P), 635(P), 636 to 677, 678(P), 679(P),

680(P), 681(P), 682(P), 685(P), 686(P), 687(P), 688, 689(P), 690, 691(P), 692(P), 737(P), 738, 739, 740,

741(P), 769(P), 770 to 783, 784(P), 795(P), 796(P), 797(P), 802(P), 803(P), 804, 805, 806, 807(P), 809(P),

955(P), 956(P), 1223, 1224(P), 1225 to 1231, 1233 to 1297, 1300 to 1311, 1314, 1316 to 1322, 1324 to 1331,

1333 to 1363.

6. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Dhaurakhaman:

1 to 19, 20(P), 21(P), 22 to 52, 53(P), 54(P), 84(P), 85(P), 86 to 101, 102(P), 103, 104, 105(P), 176(P),

178(P), 179(P), 180(P), 181(P), 182 to 212, 213(P), 214 to 221, 222(P), 223(P), 224(P), 225(P), 226(P),

255(P), 256(P), 257(P), 258, 259, 260(P), 261, 262(P), 265(P), 266(P), 267, 268(P), 269(P), 270(P), 550 to

553, 558 to 563, 566, 567, 570 to 572, 574, 575, 578 to 582, 584, 587 to 592, 595, 596, 598, 599, 600, 605,

607, 612, 614.

7. Chhendipada Reserve forest: 643.095 hectares or 1589.122 acres.

The details of land to be acquired are given in the table below:—

(II) Table

(1) Village –Kasidiha

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl. No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required for

Project in

hectares

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

1

Kasidiha

44

3

Choudhuri Pradhan S/o Lakhia Pradhan

and Others

Taila

0.136

2

Kasidiha

73

4

Dasarathi Sahu S/o Padmalava Sahu and

Others

Taila

0.176

3

Kasidiha

167

5

Maheswar sahu S/o Dasarathi Sahu and

Others

Taila

0.201

4

Kasidiha

44

9

Choudhuri Pradhan S/o Lakhia Pradhan

and Others

Patita

0.090

5

Kasidiha

44

10

Choudhuri Pradhan S/o Lakhia Pradhan

and Others

Patita

0.041

6

Kasidiha

44

11

Choudhuri Pradhan S/o Lakhia Pradhan

and Others

Patita

0.317

Total :

Village : Kasidiha

0.961

(2) Village – Thalipasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectares

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

1

Thalipasi

8

2

Khiramohan Sahoo S/o Jogendar

Sahoo and Others

Taila

0.607

2

Thalipasi

46/5

3

Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan sahu

Taila

0.133

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2633

(2) Village – Thalipasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectares

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

3

Thalipasi

45

4

Sudarshan Nayak S/o Dibakar and

others

Patita

0.061

4

Thalipasi

45

5

Sudarshan Nayak S/o Dibakar and

Others

Taila

0.178

5

Thalipasi

21

6

Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and

Others

Patita

0.101

6

Thalipasi

21

7

Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and

Others

Patita

0.174

7

Thalipasi

21

8

Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and

Others

Taila

0.243

8

Thalipasi

21

9

Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and

Others

Taila

0.174

9

Thalipasi

21

10

Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and

Others

Patita

0.049

10

Thalipasi

43

12

Santhakumar Sahoo S/o Sukru Sahoo

and Others

Patita

0.118

11

Thalipasi

43

13

Santhakumar Sahoo S/o Sukru Sahoo

and Others

Patita

0.510

12

Thalipasi

43

14

Santhakumar Sahoo S/o Sukru Sahoo

and Others

Patita

0.049

13

Thalipasi

14

15

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Do Fasali

0.542

14

Thalipasi

14

16

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Do Fasali

0.257

15

Thalipasi

14

17

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Patita

0.047

16

Thalipasi

14

18

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Do Fasali

0.198

17

Thalipasi

14

19

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Do Fasali

0.003

18

Thalipasi

21

52

Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.067

19

Thalipasi

21

53

Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.105

20

Thalipasi

21

54

Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.105

21

Thalipasi

21

55

Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.032

22

Thalipasi

21

56

Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.026

23

Thalipasi

21

57

Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.031

24

Thalipasi

21

58

Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.039

25

Thalipasi

21

59

Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.033

26

Thalipasi

21

60

Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.040

27

Thalipasi

21

61

Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.028

2634

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(2) Village – Thalipasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectares

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

28

Thalipasi

21

62

Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.038

29

Thalipasi

21

63

Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.028

30

Thalipasi

17

64

Dalagobonda Majhi S /o Maulamani

majhi

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.106

31

Thalipasi

7

66

Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and

Others

Taila

0.028

32

Thalipasi

7

67

Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.122

33

Thalipasi

7

68

Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.043

34

Thalipasi

7

69

Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and

Others

Taila

0.046

35

Thalipasi

7

70

Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.051

36

Thalipasi

7

71

Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.091

37

Thalipasi

7

72

Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.054

38

Thalipasi

7

73

Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and

Others

Taila

0.040

39

Thalipasi

13

74

Jogi Sahoo S/o Banchha Sahoo

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.091

40

Thalipasi

7

75

Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.178

41

Thalipasi

7

76

Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and

Others

Taila

0.091

42

Thalipasi

20

79

Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.199

43

Thalipasi

20

80

Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.059

44

Thalipasi

38

81

Budhia Majhi S/o Nabagana majhi

Taila

0.221

45

Thalipasi

20

87

Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.460

46

Thalipasi

20

88

Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and

Others

Patita

0.053

47

Thalipasi

6

91

Kanhu Sahoo S/o Aarata Sahoo

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.040

48

Thalipasi

6

92

Kanhu Sahoo S/o Aarata Sahoo

Taila

0.247

49

Thalipasi

27

95

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o.Madhusudan

Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.353

50

Thalipasi

32

96

Bikram Pradhan S/o Judunatha

Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.412

51

Thalipasi

25

97

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.015

52

Thalipasi

25

98

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.012

53

Thalipasi

25

99

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.024

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2635

(2) Village – Thalipasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectares

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

54

Thalipasi

25

100

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.025

55

Thalipasi

46/6

101

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.072

56

Thalipasi

30

102

Bikram Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.190

57

Thalipasi

33

103

Bhagabat gosain S/o Jadunath

Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.031

58

Thalipasi

46/4

105

Jasbant Pradhan S/o Joginath Pradhan

and Others

Gharabari

0.117

59

Thalipasi

9

106

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Gharabari

0.119

60

Thalipasi

25

107

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Gharabari

0.103

61

Thalipasi

44

108

Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.022

62

Thalipasi

46/6

109

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.022

63

Thalipasi

37

110

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.022

64

Thalipasi

30

111

Bikram Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.158

65

Thalipasi

6

112

Kanhu Sahoo S/o Aarata Sahoo

Gharabari

0.146

66

Thalipasi

22

115

Padia Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and

Others

Gharabari

0.087

67

Thalipasi

6

116

Kanhu Sahoo S/o Aarata Sahoo

Gharabari

0.077

68

Thalipasi

21

117

Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and

Others

Gharabari

0.102

69

Thalipasi

21

118

Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and

Others

Gharabari

0.090

70

Thalipasi

25

233

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.002

71

Thalipasi

39

234

Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan

and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.111

72

Thalipasi

39

235

Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan

and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.104

73

Thalipasi

15

236

Dibakar Pradhan S/o Nithyananda

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.052

74

Thalipasi

39

237

Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan

and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.057

75

Thalipasi

39

238

Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan

and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.037

76

Thalipasi

39

239

Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan

and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.056

77

Thalipasi

39

240

Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan

and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.026

78

Thalipasi

39

241

Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan

and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.022

79

Thalipasi

39

242

Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan

and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.013

2636

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(2) Village – Thalipasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectares

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

80

Thalipasi

39

243

Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan

and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.052

81

Thalipasi

39

244

Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan

and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.045

82

Thalipasi

15

245

Dibakar Pradhan S/o Nithyananda

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.003

83

Thalipasi

39

247

Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan

and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.060

84

Thalipasi

46/3

250

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.026

85

Thalipasi

25

251

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.023

86

Thalipasi

25

252

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.039

87

Thalipasi

46/6

253

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.034

88

Thalipasi

46/6

254

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.017

89

Thalipasi

44

255

Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.041

90

Thalipasi

9

256

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.027

91

Thalipasi

9

257

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.016

92

Thalipasi

37

258

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.048

93

Thalipasi

46/3

259

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.034

94

Thalipasi

25

260

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.018

95

Thalipasi

9

261

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.025

96

Thalipasi

25

262

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.028

97

Thalipasi

9

263

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.036

98

Thalipasi

25

264

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.022

99

Thalipasi

9

265

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.022

100

Thalipasi

46/3

266

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.030

101

Thalipasi

44

267

Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.027

102

Thalipasi

46/6

268

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.041

103

Thalipasi

37

269

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.017

104

Thalipasi

44

270

Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Sarada Jalasachita

0.014

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2637

(2) Village – Thalipasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectares

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

Pradhan

Ek Fasali

105

Thalipasi

37

271

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.034

106

Thalipasi

46/6

272

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.061

107

Thalipasi

46/3

273

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.049

108

Thalipasi

46/3

274

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.020

109

Thalipasi

9

275

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.043

110

Thalipasi

46/3

276

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.050

111

Thalipasi

25

277

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.063

112

Thalipasi

9

278

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.044

113

Thalipasi

37

279

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.031

114

Thalipasi

46/6

280

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.030

115

Thalipasi

46/6

281

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.052

116

Thalipasi

37

282

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.070

117

Thalipasi

44

283

Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.067

118

Thalipasi

46/6

284

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.022

119

Thalipasi

37

285

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.014

120

Thalipasi

37

286

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.029

121

Thalipasi

9

287

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.036

122

Thalipasi

25

288

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.039

123

Thalipasi

46/3

289

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.041

124

Thalipasi

37

290

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.053

125

Thalipasi

44

291

Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.023

126

Thalipasi

44

292

Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.028

127

Thalipasi

44

293

Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.036

128

Thalipasi

46/6

294

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.035

129

Thalipasi

44

295

Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Sarada Jalasachita

0.049

2638

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(2) Village – Thalipasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectares

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

Pradhan

Ek Fasali

130

Thalipasi

44

296

Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.038

131

Thalipasi

37

297

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.088

132

Thalipasi

37

298

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.040

133

Thalipasi

46/6

299

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.026

134

Thalipasi

46/6

300

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.041

135

Thalipasi

44

301

Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.075

136

Thalipasi

37

302

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.068

137

Thalipasi

46/6

303

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.046

138

Thalipasi

46/6

304

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.036

139

Thalipasi

44

305

Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.038

140

Thalipasi

25

306

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.034

141

Thalipasi

25

307

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.033

142

Thalipasi

25

308

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.041

143

Thalipasi

25

309

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.058

144

Thalipasi

25

310

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.044

145

Thalipasi

25

311

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.046

146

Thalipasi

25

312

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.058

147

Thalipasi

25

313

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.043

148

Thalipasi

25

314

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.045

149

Thalipasi

25

315

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.026

150

Thalipasi

25

316

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.023

151

Thalipasi

46/3

321

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.055

152

Thalipasi

9

322

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.026

153

Thalipasi

9

323

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.054

154

Thalipasi

9

324

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.049

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2639

(2) Village – Thalipasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectares

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

155

Thalipasi

9

325

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.060

156

Thalipasi

9

326

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.048

157

Thalipasi

9

327

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.047

158

Thalipasi

9

328

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.049

159

Thalipasi

9

329

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.039

160

Thalipasi

9

330

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.031

161

Thalipasi

46/6

331

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.030

162

Thalipasi

36

332

Birabar Pradhan S/o Madhusudan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.019

163

Thalipasi

46/3

333

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.015

164

Thalipasi

46/3

334

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.033

165

Thalipasi

46/3

335

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.039

166

Thalipasi

46/3

336

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.044

167

Thalipasi

46/3

337

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.034

168

Thalipasi

46/3

338

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.119

169

Thalipasi

46/3

339

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.064

170

Thalipasi

46/3

340

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.045

171

Thalipasi

37

341

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.036

172

Thalipasi

37

342

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.021

173

Thalipasi

46/6

344

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.025

174

Thalipasi

46/6

345

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.035

175

Thalipasi

46/6

346

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.066

176

Thalipasi

37

347

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.102

177

Thalipasi

44

348

Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.036

178

Thalipasi

44

349

Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.039

179

Thalipasi

37

350

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.075

2640

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(2) Village – Thalipasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectares

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

180

Thalipasi

37

351

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.076

181

Thalipasi

44

352

Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.145

182

Thalipasi

46/6

353

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.102

183

Thalipasi

46/6

354

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.083

184

Thalipasi

37

355

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.076

185

Thalipasi

46/6

356

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.032

186

Thalipasi

44

357

Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.029

187

Thalipasi

44

358

Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.028

188

Thalipasi

44

359

Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.041

189

Thalipasi

37

360

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.018

190

Thalipasi

37

361

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.028

191

Thalipasi

37

362

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.035

192

Thalipasi

46/6

363

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.063

193

Thalipasi

46/6

364

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.038

194

Thalipasi

46/6

365

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.056

195

Thalipasi

46/3

367

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.026

196

Thalipasi

9

369

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.025

197

Thalipasi

9

370

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.020

198

Thalipasi

25

371

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.051

199

Thalipasi

46/3

372

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.083

200

Thalipasi

25

373

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.040

201

Thalipasi

9

374

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.043

202

Thalipasi

9

375

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.016

203

Thalipasi

25

376

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.012

204

Thalipasi

46/3

377

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.029

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2641

(2) Village – Thalipasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectares

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

205

Thalipasi

46/3

378

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.023

206

Thalipasi

25

379

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.036

207

Thalipasi

9

380

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.030

208

Thalipasi

9

381

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.023

209

Thalipasi

25

382

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.023

210

Thalipasi

46/3

383

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.019

211

Thalipasi

46/3

384

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.029

212

Thalipasi

25

385

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.024

213

Thalipasi

9

386

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.024

214

Thalipasi

9

387

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.023

215

Thalipasi

25

388

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.026

216

Thalipasi

46/3

389

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.021

217

Thalipasi

46/3

390

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.031

218

Thalipasi

25

391

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.031

219

Thalipasi

9

392

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.028

220

Thalipasi

9

393

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.030

221

Thalipasi

25

394

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.030

222

Thalipasi

46/3

395

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.034

223

Thalipasi

46/3

396

Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.029

224

Thalipasi

25

397

Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.032

225

Thalipasi

9

398

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.030

226

Thalipasi

9

399

Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o

Purendera Pradhan and Others

Patita

0.013

227

Thalipasi

37

400

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.028

228

Thalipasi

37

401

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.106

229

Thalipasi

44

402

Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Sarada Jalasachita

0.064

2642

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(2) Village – Thalipasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectares

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

Pradhan

Ek Fasali

230

Thalipasi

44

403

Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.046

231

Thalipasi

44

404

Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.047

232

Thalipasi

46/6

405

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.096

233

Thalipasi

46/6

406

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.078

234

Thalipasi

44

407

Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.083

235

Thalipasi

46/6

408

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.108

236

Thalipasi

37

409

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.111

237

Thalipasi

37

410

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.100

238

Thalipasi

46/6

411

Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o

Choudhary Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.105

239

Thalipasi

44

412

Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.088

240

Thalipasi

37

413

Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.118

241

Thalipasi

14

417

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.128

242

Thalipasi

14

421

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.092

243

Thalipasi

14

422

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.042

244

Thalipasi

14

423

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.090

245

Thalipasi

14

424

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Jalasay Ek

0.014

246

Thalipasi

14

425

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Gharabari

0.086

247

Thalipasi

14

426

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.030

248

Thalipasi

14

427

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.054

249

Thalipasi

14

428

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.034

250

Thalipasi

14

429

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.020

251

Thalipasi

14

430

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.017

252

Thalipasi

14

431

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.076

253

Thalipasi

14

432

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.036

254

Thalipasi

14

433

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sarada Jalasachita

0.026

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2643

(2) Village – Thalipasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectares

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

Sahoo and Others

Ek Fasali

255

Thalipasi

14

434

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.027

256

Thalipasi

14

436

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.001

257

Thalipasi

14

437

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.005

258

Thalipasi

14

472

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Gharabari

0.009

259

Thalipasi

14

473

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Gharabari

0.022

260

Thalipasi

14

474

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Gharabari

0.006

261

Thalipasi

14

475

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Gharabari

0.026

262

Thalipasi

14

476

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Gharabari

0.012

263

Thalipasi

14

477

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Gharabari

0.043

264

Thalipasi

14

478

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Gharabari

0.013

265

Thalipasi

14

479

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Gharabari

0.019

266

Thalipasi

14

480

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Gharabari

0.016

267

Thalipasi

14

481

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Gharabari

0.021

268

Thalipasi

14

482

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Gharabari

0.024

269

Thalipasi

14

483

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Gharabari

0.056

270

Thalipasi

18

495

Nandakishor Sahoo S/o Shyam Sahoo

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.034

271

Thalipasi

46/10

500

Digambar Sahu S/o Ratnakar Sahu

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.047

272

Thalipasi

2

501

Uchhab Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.038

273

Thalipasi

3

502

Kamara Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.044

274

Thalipasi

42

503

Mahan Sahoo S/o Kuhuru Sahoo

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.055

275

Thalipasi

3

510

Kamara Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.126

276

Thalipasi

2

511

Uchhab Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.111

277

Thalipasi

42

512

Mahan Sahoo S/o Kuhuru Sahoo

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.062

278

Thalipasi

40

513

Madan Sahoo S/o Kuhuru Sahoo

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.048

2644

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(2) Village – Thalipasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectares

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

279

Thalipasi

23

514

Prakash Sahoo S/o Kuhuru Sahoo

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.051

280

Thalipasi

3

515

Kamara Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.063

281

Thalipasi

2

516

Uchhab Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.092

282

Thalipasi

12

522

Gobardhan Sahoo S/o Anadi Sahoo

and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.190

283

Thalipasi

18

523

Nandakishor Sahoo S/o Shyam Sahoo

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.080

284

Thalipasi

18

524

Nandakishor Sahoo S/o Shyam Sahoo

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.086

285

Thalipasi

18

525

Nandakishor Sahoo S/o Shyam Sahoo

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.088

286

Thalipasi

18

526

Nandakishor Sahoo S/o Shyam Sahoo

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.050

287

Thalipasi

18

527

Nandakishor Sahoo S/o Shyam Sahoo

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.058

288

Thalipasi

12

528

Gobardhan Sahoo S/o Anadi Sahoo

and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.080

289

Thalipasi

23

529

Prakash Sahoo S/o Kuhuru Sahoo

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.023

290

Thalipasi

40

530

Madan Sahoo S/o Kuhuru Sahoo

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.022

291

Thalipasi

3

531

Kamara Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.040

292

Thalipasi

2

532

Uchhab Sahoo S/o kalyan Sahoo

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.043

293

Thalipasi

11

533

Gobardhan Sahoo S/o Anadi Sahoo

and Others

Patita

0.024

294

Thalipasi

11

534

Gobardhan Sahoo S/o Anadi Sahoo

and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.044

295

Thalipasi

24

535

Prakash Sahoo S/o.kuhur Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.019

296

Thalipasi

24

536

Prakash Sahoo S/o.kuhur Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.027

297

Thalipasi

10

539

Guji Pradhan S/o Panu pradhan and

others

Sarada Jalasachita

Do Fasali

0.070

298

Thalipasi

10

540

Guji Pradhan S/o Panu pradhan and

others

Sarada Jalasachita

Do Fasali

0.051

299

Thalipasi

10

543

Guji Pradhan S/o Panu pradhan and

others

Sarada Jalasachita

Do Fasali

0.169

300

Thalipasi

10

544

Guji Pradhan S/o Panu pradhan and

others

Sarada Jalasachita

Do Fasali

0.171

301

Thalipasi

10

548

Guji Pradhan S/o Panu pradhan and

others

Sarada Jalasachita

Do Fasali

0.044

302

Thalipasi

14

549

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Do Fasali

0.050

303

Thalipasi

20

550

Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and

Patita

0.018

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2645

(2) Village – Thalipasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectares

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

Others

304

Thalipasi

14

551

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Patita

0.096

305

Thalipasi

20

552

Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Do Fasali

0.036

306

Thalipasi

20

553

Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Do Fasali

0.015

307

Thalipasi

14

561

Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo

Sahoo and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Do Fasali

0.001

308

Thalipasi

20

569

Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.019

309

Thalipasi

20

570

Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and

Others

Taila

0.216

310

Thalipasi

46/5

576

Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan sahu

Taila

0.487

311

Thalipasi

46/5

577

Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan sahu

Taila

0.140

312

Thalipasi

46/5

578

Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan sahu

Patita

0.013

313

Thalipasi

30

579

Bikram Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan and Others

Gharabari

0.132

314

Thalipasi

30

580

Bikram Pradhan S/o Jadunath

Pradhan and Others

Gharabari

0.121

315

Thalipasi

46/7

581

Manoj Kumar Pradhan S/o

Balukeswar Pradhan

Taila

0.028

316

Thalipasi

46/8

582

Kumuda Pradhan S/o Balukeswar

Pradhan

Taila

0.046

317

Thalipasi

46/9

583

Chabila Kumar Pradhan S/o

Balukeswar Pradhan

Taila

0.039

Total :

Village- Thalipasi

20.555

(3) Village – Bimbadharpur

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

1

Bimbadharpur

22

6

Benudhar

Pradhan

S/o

Narana Pradhan and Others

Taila

1.150

2

Bimbadharpur

16

7

Nisamani Sadangi W/o.

Balkrishna Sadangi

Taila

0.387

3

Bimbadharpur

16

8

Nisamani Sadangi W/o.

Balkrishna Sadangi

Taila

0.419

4

Bimbadharpur

22

12

Benudhar

Pradhan

S/o

Narana Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.147

5

Bimbadharpur

22

13

Benudhar

Pradhan

S/o

Narana Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.157

2646

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(3) Village – Bimbadharpur

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

6

Bimbadharpur

22

14

Benudhar

Pradhan

S/o

Narana Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.456

7

Bimbadharpur

22

15

Benudhar

Pradhan

S/o

Narana Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.132

8

Bimbadharpur

29

16

Saroj Naik S/o Sardar Naik

and Others

Taila

0.104

9

Bimbadharpur

34/10

18

Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.

Bishnu Charan Sahu

Taila

0.274

10

Bimbadharpur

34/10

20

Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.

Bishnu Charan Sahu

Taila

0.226

11

Bimbadharpur

34/5

21

Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.

Bishnu Charan Sahu

Taila

0.146

12

Bimbadharpur

34/34

22

Sisir Kumar Behera S/o Kalia

Behera

Taila

0.139

13

Bimbadharpur

10

23

Trinath Naik S/o. Beda Naik

and Others

Taila

0.056

14

Bimbadharpur

7

29

Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishtam

Naik and Others

Taila

0.113

15

Bimbadharpur

7

30

Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishtam

Naik and Others

Taila

0.232

16

Bimbadharpur

27

31

Ratana Naik S/o Kalia Naik

and Others

Taila

0.584

17

Bimbadharpur

20

32

Bikala Bagh S/o. Mulia Bagh

and Others

Taila

0.505

18

Bimbadharpur

34/9

33

Uma Naik W/o. Kalyan Naik

Taila

0.515

19

Bimbadharpur

17

39

Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu

and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.030

20

Bimbadharpur

17

40

Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu

and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.026

21

Bimbadharpur

17

41

Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu

and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.051

22

Bimbadharpur

17

44

Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu

and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.043

23

Bimbadharpur

17

45

Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu

and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.028

24

Bimbadharpur

17

46

Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu

and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.020

25

Bimbadharpur

17

47

Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu

and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.091

26

Bimbadharpur

17

48

Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu

and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.044

27

Bimbadharpur

17

49

Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu

and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.063

28

Bimbadharpur

17

50

Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu

and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.084

29

Bimbadharpur

17

51

Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu

and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.082

30

Bimbadharpur

4

52

Khiramohan

Sahu

S/o

Jogendra sahu and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.079

31

Bimbadharpur

4

53

Khiramohan

Sahu

S/o

Sarada Jalasachita

0.069

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2647

(3) Village – Bimbadharpur

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

Jogendra sahu and Others

Ek Fasali

32

Bimbadharpur

4

54

Khiramohan

Sahu

S/o

Jogendra sahu and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.038

33

Bimbadharpur

4

55

Khiramohan

Sahu

S/o

Jogendra sahu and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.048

34

Bimbadharpur

4

56

Khiramohan

Sahu

S/o

Jogendra sahu and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.052

35

Bimbadharpur

4

57

Khiramohan

Sahu

S/o

Jogendra sahu and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.032

36

Bimbadharpur

4

58

Khiramohan

Sahu

S/o

Jogendra sahu and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.057

37

Bimbadharpur

2

59

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.042

38

Bimbadharpur

15

60

Nakofodi

Pradhan

S/o

Sahadeb Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.274

39

Bimbadharpur

8

61

Jadu Pradhan S/o Arakhita

Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.123

40

Bimbadharpur

8

62

Jadu Pradhan S/o Arakhita

Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.121

41

Bimbadharpur

34/8

63

Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.

Bishnu Charan sahu

Taila

0.279

42

Bimbadharpur

8

64

Jadu Pradhan S/o Arakhita

Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.105

43

Bimbadharpur

8

65

Jadu Pradhan S/o Arakhita

Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.106

44

Bimbadharpur

8

66

Jadu Pradhan S/o Arakhita

Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.109

45

Bimbadharpur

8

67

Jadu Pradhan S/o Arakhita

Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.401

46

Bimbadharpur

1

78

Kapil Pradhan S/o. Suna

pradhan

Taila

0.079

47

Bimbadharpur

1

80

Kapil Pradhan S/o. Suna

pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.130

48

Bimbadharpur

1

81

Kapil Pradhan S/o. Suna

pradhan

Taila

0.270

49

Bimbadharpur

31

82

Srinibas Naik S/o Balaka

Naik

Taila

0.308

50

Bimbadharpur

34/17

83

Saroj Kumar Behera S/o

Ragunath Behera and Others

Taila

0.220

51

Bimbadharpur

7

84

Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishtam

Naik and Others

Taila

0.157

52

Bimbadharpur

34/7

105

Satyanarayana

Sahu

S/o.

Bhajaman Sahu

Taila

0.342

53

Bimbadharpur

14

106

Durjodhana Sahu S/o.Pathani

Sahu and Others

Taila

0.119

54

Bimbadharpur

14

107

Durjodhana Sahu S/o.Pathani

Sahu and Others

Taila

0.180

55

Bimbadharpur

14

108

Durjodhana Sahu S/o.Pathani

Sahu and Others

Taila

0.136

2648

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(3) Village – Bimbadharpur

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

56

Bimbadharpur

26

114

Maheswar

Sahu

S/o.

Dasarathi Sahu and Others

Taila

0.517

57

Bimbadharpur

30

116

Sarangadhar

Sahu

S/o

Banguru Sahu

Taila

0.294

58

Bimbadharpur

9

121

Damburu

Pradhan,

S/o.Nityananda Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.288

59

Bimbadharpur

34

123

Hrudanand Dehury S/o Kathi

Dehury and Others

Taila

0.222

60

Bimbadharpur

34

128

Hrudanand Dehury S/o Kathi

Dehury and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.220

61

Bimbadharpur

34

129

Hrudanand Dehury S/o Kathi

Dehury and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.092

62

Bimbadharpur

34

130

Hrudanand Dehury S/o Kathi

Dehury and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.043

63

Bimbadharpur

5

131

Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.188

64

Bimbadharpur

5

132

Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha

Taila

0.163

65

Bimbadharpur

5

133

Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.064

66

Bimbadharpur

5

134

Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.016

67

Bimbadharpur

5

135

Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.071

68

Bimbadharpur

5

136

Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.092

69

Bimbadharpur

5

137

Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha

Taila

0.434

70

Bimbadharpur

3

139

Kishori Pradhan S/o. Nata

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.614

71

Bimbadharpur

33

150

Hatua Behera S/o Madan

Behera and Others

Taila

0.060

72

Bimbadharpur

33

151

Hatua Behera S/o Madan

Behera and Others

Taila

0.045

73

Bimbadharpur

33

152

Hatua Behera S/o Madan

Behera and Others

Taila

0.061

74

Bimbadharpur

33

153

Hatua Behera S/o Madan

Behera and Others

Taila

0.037

75

Bimbadharpur

33

154

Hatua Behera S/o Madan

Behera and Others

Taila

0.030

76

Bimbadharpur

33

156

Hatua Behera S/o Madan

Behera and Others

Taila

0.322

77

Bimbadharpur

33

157

Hatua Behera S/o Madan

Behera and Others

Taila

0.104

78

Bimbadharpur

33

158

Hatua Behera S/o Madan

Behera and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.130

79

Bimbadharpur

33

159

Hatua Behera S/o Madan

Behera and Others

Taila

0.160

80

Bimbadharpur

19

160

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and others

Taila

1.238

81

Bimbadharpur

22

166

Benudhar

Pradhan

S/o

Narana Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.726

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2649

(3) Village – Bimbadharpur

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

82

Bimbadharpur

25

168

Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia

pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.095

83

Bimbadharpur

25

169

Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia

pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.085

84

Bimbadharpur

25

173

Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia

pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.019

85

Bimbadharpur

25

174

Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia

pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.048

86

Bimbadharpur

25

175

Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia

pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.099

87

Bimbadharpur

25

176

Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia

pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.124

88

Bimbadharpur

25

177

Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia

pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.033

89

Bimbadharpur

25

178

Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia

pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.019

90

Bimbadharpur

25

179

Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia

pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.018

91

Bimbadharpur

25

180

Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia

pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.037

92

Bimbadharpur

25

181

Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia

pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.026

93

Bimbadharpur

25

182

Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia

pradhan

Taila

0.062

94

Bimbadharpur

6

183

GopalChandra Pradhan S/o

Benudhar

Pradhan

and

Others

Taila

0.087

95

Bimbadharpur

15

184

Nakofodi

Pradhan

S/o

Sahadeb Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.077

96

Bimbadharpur

21

185

Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga

Pradhan

Taila

0.076

97

Bimbadharpur

2

186

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.100

98

Bimbadharpur

2

187

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.121

99

Bimbadharpur

11

188

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Taila

0.075

100

Bimbadharpur

11

189

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Taila

0.072

101

Bimbadharpur

11

190

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Taila

0.090

102

Bimbadharpur

23

191

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Taila

0.100

103

Bimbadharpur

23

192

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Taila

0.091

104

Bimbadharpur

18

193

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Taila

0.113

2650

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(3) Village – Bimbadharpur

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

105

Bimbadharpur

18

194

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Taila

0.133

106

Bimbadharpur

21

195

Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga

Pradhan

Taila

0.214

107

Bimbadharpur

22

196

Benudhar

Pradhan

S/o

Narana Pradhan and Others

Patita

0.008

108

Bimbadharpur

23

197

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.051

109

Bimbadharpur

23

198

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.050

110

Bimbadharpur

23

199

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.046

111

Bimbadharpur

23

200

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.046

112

Bimbadharpur

23

201

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.042

113

Bimbadharpur

23

202

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.045

114

Bimbadharpur

23

203

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.072

115

Bimbadharpur

23

204

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.029

116

Bimbadharpur

23

205

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.037

117

Bimbadharpur

23

206

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.069

118

Bimbadharpur

23

207

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.027

119

Bimbadharpur

23

208

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.033

120

Bimbadharpur

23

209

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.033

121

Bimbadharpur

23

210

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.028

122

Bimbadharpur

23

211

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.083

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2651

(3) Village – Bimbadharpur

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

123

Bimbadharpur

23

212

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.049

124

Bimbadharpur

23

213

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.036

125

Bimbadharpur

23

214

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.041

126

Bimbadharpur

23

215

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.033

127

Bimbadharpur

23

216

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.048

128

Bimbadharpur

23

217

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.037

129

Bimbadharpur

23

218

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.043

130

Bimbadharpur

23

219

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.021

131

Bimbadharpur

23

220

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.024

132

Bimbadharpur

23

221

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.029

133

Bimbadharpur

22

222

Benudhar

Pradhan

S/o

Narana Pradhan and Others

Patita

0.060

134

Bimbadharpur

23

223

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.027

135

Bimbadharpur

23

224

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.045

136

Bimbadharpur

21

225

Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.423

137

Bimbadharpur

21

226

Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.037

138

Bimbadharpur

21

227

Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.037

139

Bimbadharpur

21

228

Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.037

140

Bimbadharpur

21

229

Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.031

141

Bimbadharpur

21

230

Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.034

142

Bimbadharpur

21

231

Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.045

2652

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(3) Village – Bimbadharpur

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

143

Bimbadharpur

18

232

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.052

144

Bimbadharpur

18

233

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.041

145

Bimbadharpur

18

234

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.033

146

Bimbadharpur

18

235

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.032

147

Bimbadharpur

18

236

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.035

148

Bimbadharpur

18

237

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.153

149

Bimbadharpur

18

238

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.039

150

Bimbadharpur

18

239

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.041

151

Bimbadharpur

18

240

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.045

152

Bimbadharpur

18

241

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.035

153

Bimbadharpur

18

242

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.140

154

Bimbadharpur

15

243

Nakofodi

Pradhan

S/o

Sahadeb Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.143

155

Bimbadharpur

15

244

Nakofodi

Pradhan

S/o

Sahadeb Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.137

156

Bimbadharpur

15

245

Nakofodi

Pradhan

S/o

Sahadeb Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.118

157

Bimbadharpur

15

246

Nakofodi

Pradhan

S/o

Sahadeb Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.116

158

Bimbadharpur

15

247

Nakofodi

Pradhan

S/o

Sahadeb Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.111

159

Bimbadharpur

15

248

Nakofodi

Pradhan

S/o

Sahadeb Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.115

160

Bimbadharpur

15

249

Nakofodi

Pradhan

S/o

Sahadeb Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.047

161

Bimbadharpur

15

250

Nakofodi

Pradhan

S/o

Sahadeb Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.047

162

Bimbadharpur

6

251

GopalChandra Pradhan S/o

Benudhar

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.092

163

Bimbadharpur

6

252

GopalChandra Pradhan S/o

Benudhar

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.082

164

Bimbadharpur

6

253

GopalChandra Pradhan S/o

Benudhar

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.074

165

Bimbadharpur

6

254

GopalChandra Pradhan S/o

Benudhar

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.069

166

Bimbadharpur

6

255

GopalChandra Pradhan S/o

Sarada Jalasachita

0.111

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2653

(3) Village – Bimbadharpur

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

Benudhar

Pradhan

and

Others

Ek Fasali

167

Bimbadharpur

34/21

256

Janak Dehury S/o Mulia

Dehury

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.120

168

Bimbadharpur

6

257

GopalChandra Pradhan S/o

Benudhar

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.249

169

Bimbadharpur

11

258

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.059

170

Bimbadharpur

11

259

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.015

171

Bimbadharpur

11

260

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.009

172

Bimbadharpur

11

261

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.016

173

Bimbadharpur

11

262

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.018

174

Bimbadharpur

2

263

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.053

175

Bimbadharpur

2

264

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.041

176

Bimbadharpur

2

265

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.227

177

Bimbadharpur

2

266

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.087

178

Bimbadharpur

2

267

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.101

179

Bimbadharpur

11

268

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.115

180

Bimbadharpur

11

269

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.105

181

Bimbadharpur

11

270

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.070

182

Bimbadharpur

11

271

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.038

183

Bimbadharpur

11

272

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.091

184

Bimbadharpur

11

273

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.098

185

Bimbadharpur

11

274

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.092

186

Bimbadharpur

2

275

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.070

187

Bimbadharpur

2

276

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.107

188

Bimbadharpur

2

277

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.024

189

Bimbadharpur

2

278

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.025

190

Bimbadharpur

2

279

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Sarada Jalasachita

0.023

2654

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(3) Village – Bimbadharpur

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

Pradhan and Others

Ek Fasali

191

Bimbadharpur

2

280

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.078

192

Bimbadharpur

2

281

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.023

193

Bimbadharpur

11

282

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.023

194

Bimbadharpur

11

283

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.019

195

Bimbadharpur

11

284

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.023

196

Bimbadharpur

11

285

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.039

197

Bimbadharpur

11

286

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.033

198

Bimbadharpur

11

287

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.044

199

Bimbadharpur

11

288

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.049

200

Bimbadharpur

11

289

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.042

201

Bimbadharpur

2

290

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.052

202

Bimbadharpur

2

291

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.052

203

Bimbadharpur

11

292

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.042

204

Bimbadharpur

11

293

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.015

205

Bimbadharpur

11

294

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.018

206

Bimbadharpur

11

295

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.022

207

Bimbadharpur

11

296

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.020

208

Bimbadharpur

11

297

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.107

209

Bimbadharpur

11

298

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.110

210

Bimbadharpur

11

299

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.110

211

Bimbadharpur

11

300

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.062

212

Bimbadharpur

11

301

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.093

213

Bimbadharpur

11

302

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Taila

0.067

214

Bimbadharpur

11

303

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

pradhan and Others

Taila

0.051

215

Bimbadharpur

11

304

Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka

Taila

0.160

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2655

(3) Village – Bimbadharpur

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

pradhan and Others

216

Bimbadharpur

23

305

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Taila

0.035

217

Bimbadharpur

23

306

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Taila

0.129

218

Bimbadharpur

23

307

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Taila

0.165

219

Bimbadharpur

23

308

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Taila

0.159

220

Bimbadharpur

23

309

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Taila

0.158

221

Bimbadharpur

18

312

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Taila

0.049

222

Bimbadharpur

18

313

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Taila

0.056

223

Bimbadharpur

18

314

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Taila

0.040

224

Bimbadharpur

18

315

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Taila

0.045

225

Bimbadharpur

18

316

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Taila

0.040

226

Bimbadharpur

18

317

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Taila

0.043

227

Bimbadharpur

18

318

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Taila

0.041

228

Bimbadharpur

18

319

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Taila

0.026

229

Bimbadharpur

18

320

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Taila

0.057

230

Bimbadharpur

18

321

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Taila

0.037

231

Bimbadharpur

18

322

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Taila

0.037

232

Bimbadharpur

18

323

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Taila

0.039

233

Bimbadharpur

18

324

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Taila

0.081

234

Bimbadharpur

6

325

GopalChandra Pradhan S/o

Benudhar

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.078

235

Bimbadharpur

18

326

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Taila

0.070

236

Bimbadharpur

21

327

Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga

Pradhan

Taila

0.210

237

Bimbadharpur

15

328

Nakofodi

Pradhan

S/o

Sahadeb Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.171

238

Bimbadharpur

21

333

Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga

Pradhan

Taila

0.161

2656

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(3) Village – Bimbadharpur

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

239

Bimbadharpur

6

334

GopalChandra Pradhan S/o

Benudhar

Pradhan

and

Others

Taila

0.123

240

Bimbadharpur

6

335

GopalChandra Pradhan S/o

Benudhar

Pradhan

and

Others

Taila

0.056

241

Bimbadharpur

6

336

GopalChandra Pradhan S/o

Benudhar

Pradhan

and

Others

Taila

0.119

242

Bimbadharpur

2

337

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.179

243

Bimbadharpur

2

338

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.171

244

Bimbadharpur

2

339

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.114

245

Bimbadharpur

2

340

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.086

246

Bimbadharpur

2

341

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.044

247

Bimbadharpur

2

342

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.028

248

Bimbadharpur

2

343

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.022

249

Bimbadharpur

2

344

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.022

250

Bimbadharpur

6

345

GopalChandra Pradhan S/o

Benudhar

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.044

251

Bimbadharpur

6

346

GopalChandra Pradhan S/o

Benudhar

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.034

252

Bimbadharpur

6

347

GopalChandra Pradhan S/o

Benudhar

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.027

253

Bimbadharpur

6

348

GopalChandra Pradhan S/o

Benudhar

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.030

254

Bimbadharpur

6

349

GopalChandra Pradhan S/o

Benudhar

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.027

255

Bimbadharpur

6

350

GopalChandra Pradhan S/o

Benudhar

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.029

256

Bimbadharpur

6

351

GopalChandra Pradhan S/o

Benudhar

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.051

257

Bimbadharpur

4

352

Khiramohan

Sahu

S/o

Jogendra sahu and Others

Taila

0.112

258

Bimbadharpur

9

353

Damburu

Pradhan,

S/o.Nityananda Pradhan

Taila

0.146

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2657

(3) Village – Bimbadharpur

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

259

Bimbadharpur

18

354

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.042

260

Bimbadharpur

18

355

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.065

261

Bimbadharpur

18

356

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.027

262

Bimbadharpur

18

357

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.076

263

Bimbadharpur

23

358

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.071

264

Bimbadharpur

23

359

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o

Nityanand

Pradhan

and

Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.099

265

Bimbadharpur

9

360

Damburu

Pradhan,

S/o.Nityananda Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.013

266

Bimbadharpur

9

361

Damburu

Pradhan,

S/o.Nityananda Pradhan

Taila

0.049

267

Bimbadharpur

15

366

Nakofodi

Pradhan

S/o

Sahadeb Pradhan and Others

Patita

0.065

268

Bimbadharpur

24

367

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o.

Nityananda

Pradhan

and

Others

Taila

0.394

269

Bimbadharpur

24

368

Baishnab

Pradhan

S/o.

Nityananda

Pradhan

and

Others

Taila

0.022

270

Bimbadharpur

4

369

Khiramohan

Sahu

S/o

Jogendra sahu and Others

Taila

0.277

271

Bimbadharpur

4

370

Khiramohan

Sahu

S/o

Jogendra sahu and Others

Taila

0.079

272

Bimbadharpur

4

371

Khiramohan

Sahu

S/o

Jogendra sahu and Others

Taila

0.066

273

Bimbadharpur

4

372

Khiramohan

Sahu

S/o

Jogendra sahu and Others

Taila

0.158

274

Bimbadharpur

21

377

Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.172

275

Bimbadharpur

21

378

Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.203

276

Bimbadharpur

21

379

Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga

Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.048

277

Bimbadharpur

18

381

Balabhadra

Pradhan

S/o

Maguni pradhan and Others

Taila

0.403

278

Bimbadharpur

2

382

Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha

Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.308

279

Bimbadharpur

34/5

395

Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.

Bishnu Charan Sahu

Taila

0.769

280

Bimbadharpur

34/2

396

Bholaswar Sahu S/o Baguru

Sahu

Taila

0.362

281

Bimbadharpur

34/4

397

Binodini Rauta W/o Vaishnab

Rauta

Taila

0.320

2658

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(3) Village – Bimbadharpur

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

282

Bimbadharpur

34/6

398

Srimant Kumar Sahu S/o

Bishnu Charan Sahu

Taila

0.345

283

Bimbadharpur

34/8

399

Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.

Bishnu Charan sahu

Taila

0.240

284

Bimbadharpur

34/11

401

Gandharba Naik S/o

Kurtartha Naik

Taila

0.267

285

Bimbadharpur

34/11

402

Gandharba Naik S/o

Kurtartha Naik

Taila

0.151

286

Bimbadharpur

34/12

403

Ranjan Kumar Behera S/o

Kandarpa Behera

Taila

0.159

287

Bimbadharpur

34/10

404

Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.

Bishnu Charan Sahu

Taila

0.051

288

Bimbadharpur

34/10

405

Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.

Bishnu Charan Sahu

Taila

0.053

289

Bimbadharpur

34/10

406

Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.

Bishnu Charan Sahu

Taila

0.038

290

Bimbadharpur

34/10

407

Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.

Bishnu Charan Sahu

Taila

0.029

291

Bimbadharpur

34/10

408

Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.

Bishnu Charan Sahu

Taila

0.040

292

Bimbadharpur

34/10

409

Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.

Bishnu Charan Sahu

Taila

0.081

293

Bimbadharpur

34/10

410

Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.

Bishnu Charan Sahu

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.110

294

Bimbadharpur

34/13

411

Arun Kumar Naik S/o

Harihara Naik

Taila

0.090

295

Bimbadharpur

34/14

412

Sabita Sahu W/o Jagabandhu

Sahu

Taila

0.055

296

Bimbadharpur

34/15

413

Hatakisora Pradhan S/o

Dayanidhi Pradhan

Taila

0.019

297

Bimbadharpur

34/16

414

Sanatana Baga S/o Khiti Baga

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.077

298

Bimbadharpur

34/18

415

Sarathi Sahu S/o Goura Sahu

Taila

0.038

299

Bimbadharpur

34/19

416

Bhagabat Sahu S/o Bala Sahu

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.016

300

Bimbadharpur

34/20

417

Binya Kumar Behera S/o

Susant Kumar Behera and

Others

Taila

0.116

301

Bimbadharpur

34/22

418

Dharmendra Sahu S/o

Rabindra Sahu

Taila

0.108

302

Bimbadharpur

34/23

419

Manoj Kumar Sahu S/o Raj

Sahu

Taila

0.062

303

Bimbadharpur

34/24

420

Ranjita Pradhan S/o

Haramohan Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.011

304

Bimbadharpur

34/24

421

Ranjita Pradhan S/o

Haramohan Pradhan

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.014

305

Bimbadharpur

34/25

422

Binya Kumar Behera S/o

Susant Kumar Behera and

Others

Taila

0.183

306

Bimbadharpur

34/25

423

Binya Kumar Behera S/o

Susant Kumar Behera and

Taila

0.106

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2659

(3) Village – Bimbadharpur

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required

for Project

in hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

Others

307

Bimbadharpur

34/25

424

Binya Kumar Behera S/o

Susant Kumar Behera and

Others

Taila

0.044

308

Bimbadharpur

34/28

425

Tukuna Naik S/o Dilaswar

Naik

Taila

0.047

309

Bimbadharpur

34/26

426

Praful Kumar Sethi S/o

Bauribandhu Sethi

Taila

0.049

310

Bimbadharpur

34/27

427

Kuntala Behera W/o

Sachidananda Behera

Taila

0.033

311

Bimbadharpur

34/29

428

Binapani Pradhan W/o

Kalpaswar Sahu

Taila

0.179

312

Bimbadharpur

34/30

429

Gangadhar Baga S/o Bikal

Baga

Taila

0.017

313

Bimbadharpur

34/31

430

Dharanidhar Baga S/o Bikal

Baga

Taila

0.017

314

Bimbadharpur

34/32

431

Sulochana Mahakuda W/o

Bidyadhar Mahakuda

Taila

0.020

315

Bimbadharpur

34/33

432

Rebati Rauta W/o

TanuChandra Rauta

Taila

0.020

Total :

Village – Bimbadharpur

35.724

(4) Village – Kudapasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required for

Project in

hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

1

Kudapasi

114/27

3

Srimata kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Taila

0.291

2

Kudapasi

12

4

Kulamani Naik S/o Bairagi Naik

Taila

0.279

3

Kudapasi

111

6

Sudam Sethy S/o Bashu Sethy

Taila

0.181

4

Kudapasi

111

7

Sudam Sethy S/o Bashu Sethy

Taila

0.072

5

Kudapasi

111

8

Sudam Sethy S/o Bashu Sethy

Taila

0.105

6

Kudapasi

111

9

Sudam Sethy S/o Bashu Sethy

Taila

0.122

7

Kudapasi

107

23

Shriram Sethy S/o Dukhu Sethy

Taila

0.088

8

Kudapasi

94

41

Ruma Majhi D/o Bhagaban Majhi

Taila

0.123

9

Kudapasi

94

42

Ruma Majhi D/o Bhagaban Majhi

Taila

1.011

10

Kudapasi

102

43

Shyamaghana Majhi S/o

Bhagaban Majhi

Taila

0.161

11

Kudapasi

102

44

Shyamaghana Majhi S/o

Bhagaban Majhi

Taila

0.107

12

Kudapasi

102

45

Shyamaghana Majhi S/o

Bhagaban Majhi

Taila

0.081

13

Kudapasi

102

46

Shyamaghana Majhi S/o

Bhagaban Majhi

Patita

0.043

2660

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(4) Village – Kudapasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required for

Project in

hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

14

Kudapasi

68

48

Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi

patita

0.032

15

Kudapasi

68

49

Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.086

16

Kudapasi

68

50

Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.022

17

Kudapasi

68

51

Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.040

18

Kudapasi

68

57

Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.022

19

Kudapasi

68

58

Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.022

20

Kudapasi

68

59

Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.022

21

Kudapasi

68

60

Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.028

22

Kudapasi

68

61

Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.026

23

Kudapasi

68

64

Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.057

24

Kudapasi

68

65

Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.026

25

Kudapasi

68

66

Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.068

26

Kudapasi

68

67

Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi

Patita

0.052

27

Kudapasi

68

76

Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.038

28

Kudapasi

68

77

Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.082

29

Kudapasi

68

78

Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi

Patita

0.145

30

Kudapasi

16

79

Khageswar Mahji S/o Bagaban

Majhi

Taila

0.695

31

Kudapasi

16

80

Khageswar Mahji S/o Bagaban

Majhi

Taila

0.227

32

Kudapasi

77

81

Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu

Taila

0.308

33

Kudapasi

50

83

Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu

Taila

0.307

34

Kudapasi

114

84

Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu

Taila

0.315

35

Kudapasi

66

98

Pranabandhu Sahu S/o Panchu

Sahu

Taila

0.071

36

Kudapasi

66

99

Pranabandhu Sahu S/o Panchu

Sahu

Taila

0.101

37

Kudapasi

114/27

103

Srimata kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Taila

0.420

38

Kudapasi

40

104

Nalu sahu S/o Bauri sahu

Taila

0.282

39

Kudapasi

13

107

Keshaba Sahu S/o Kungei Sahu

Taila

0.080

40

Kudapasi

40

109

Nalu sahu S/o Bauri sahu

Taila

0.205

41

Kudapasi

114/33

115

Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Taila

0.275

42

Kudapasi

114/40

116

Manmohan Pradhan S/o Gadadhar

Pradhan

Taila

0.046

43

Kudapasi

114/8

117

Panchali Barik W/o Prabhat Kiran

Taila

0.085

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2661

(4) Village – Kudapasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required for

Project in

hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

Barik

44

Kudapasi

87

122

Mahan Shau S/o Kuhuru Sahu

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.075

45

Kudapasi

87

123

Mahan Shau S/o Kuhuru Sahu

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.157

46

Kudapasi

87

125

Mahan Shau S/o Kuhuru Sahu

Taila

0.164

47

Kudapasi

87

126

Mahan Shau S/o Kuhuru Sahu

Taila

0.143

48

Kudapasi

72

128

Balram Majhi S/o Chaitanya Majhi

and Others

Taila

0.175

49

Kudapasi

73

133

Basudev Sahu S/o Nanda Sahu and

Others

Taila

0.449

50

Kudapasi

43

136

Nilamani Sahu S/o Hari sahu

Taila

0.100

51

Kudapasi

25

137

Choudhary Sahu S/o Nityananda

Sahu and Others

Taila

0.164

52

Kudapasi

43

138

Nilamani Sahu S/o Hari sahu

Taila

0.083

53

Kudapasi

30

142

Jogi Majhi S/o Bauri Majhi and

Others

Taila

0.527

54

Kudapasi

30

143

Jogi Majhi S/o Bauri Majhi and

Others

Taila

0.048

55

Kudapasi

84

144

Bhagirathi Majhi S/o Bira Majhi

and Others

Taila

0.420

56

Kudapasi

81

166

Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda

Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.756

57

Kudapasi

39

179

Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.216

58

Kudapasi

39

180

Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb

Pradhan and Others

Patita

0.024

59

Kudapasi

39

181

Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb

Pradhan and Others

Patita

0.009

60

Kudapasi

39

182

Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.131

61

Kudapasi

39

183

Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb

Pradhan and Others

Patita

0.009

62

Kudapasi

39

184

Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb

Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.177

63

Kudapasi

39

185

Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb

Pradhan and Others

Bagayat Dei

0.062

64

Kudapasi

39

187

Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.043

65

Kudapasi

79

189

Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.030

66

Kudapasi

79

190

Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.045

67

Kudapasi

79

191

Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.017

68

Kudapasi

79

192

Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.017

69

Kudapasi

79

194

Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.383

2662

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(4) Village – Kudapasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required for

Project in

hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

70

Kudapasi

79

195

Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.197

71

Kudapasi

79

196

Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.169

72

Kudapasi

75

197

Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar

Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.018

73

Kudapasi

79

198

Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran

Pradhan and Others

Patita

0.014

74

Kudapasi

79

199

Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran

Pradhan and Others

Patita

0.014

75

Kudapasi

79

200

Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.206

76

Kudapasi

79

201

Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.315

77

Kudapasi

79

202

Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.675

78

Kudapasi

23

204

Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik

and Others

Taila

0.016

79

Kudapasi

114/65

206

Biswanath Sethi S/o Kailash Sethi

Taila

0.145

80

Kudapasi

1

215

Abhiram Naik S/o Balak Naik

Taila

0.232

81

Kudapasi

75

222

Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar

Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.040

82

Kudapasi

74

224

Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.042

83

Kudapasi

74

225

Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.137

84

Kudapasi

75

226

Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.061

85

Kudapasi

75

227

Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.195

86

Kudapasi

75

229

Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar

Pradhan and Others

Patita

0.030

87

Kudapasi

75

231

Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar

Pradhan and Others

Patita

0.031

88

Kudapasi

75

232

Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.113

89

Kudapasi

75

233

Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar

Pradhan and Others

Patita

0.016

90

Kudapasi

75

234

Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.066

91

Kudapasi

81

235

Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda

Pradhan and Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.040

92

Kudapasi

81

236

Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda

Pradhan and Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.039

93

Kudapasi

75

237

Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.044

94

Kudapasi

81

240

Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda

Pradhan and Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.045

95

Kudapasi

81

241

Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda

Pradhan and Others

Patita

0.020

96

Kudapasi

81

242

Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda

Sarada

0.150

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2663

(4) Village – Kudapasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required for

Project in

hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

Pradhan and Others

Anajalasachita Tini

97

Kudapasi

81

243

Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda

Pradhan and Others

Patita

0.008

98

Kudapasi

81

244

Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda

Pradhan and Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.086

99

Kudapasi

81

245

Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda

Pradhan and Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.098

100

Kudapasi

81

246

Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda

Pradhan and Others

Patita

0.012

101

Kudapasi

81

247

Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda

Pradhan and Others

Patita

0.010

102

Kudapasi

81

248

Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda

Pradhan and Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.072

103

Kudapasi

81

249

Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda

Pradhan and Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.079

104

Kudapasi

81

253

Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda

Pradhan and Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.116

105

Kudapasi

81

254

Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda

Pradhan and Others

Patita

0.025

106

Kudapasi

75

260

Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.181

107

Kudapasi

75

263

Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.151

108

Kudapasi

75

265

Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar

Pradhan and Others

Patita

0.013

109

Kudapasi

75

266

Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar

Pradhan and Others

Patita

0.012

110

Kudapasi

75

267

Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar

Pradhan and Others

Sarada Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.160

111

Kudapasi

47

273

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.228

112

Kudapasi

47

274

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.233

113

Kudapasi

47

275

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.247

114

Kudapasi

47

276

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and

Others

Patita

0.075

115

Kudapasi

47

277

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.132

116

Kudapasi

47

278

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.106

117

Kudapasi

47

279

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.283

118

Kudapasi

47

280

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.285

119

Kudapasi

47

281

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and

Others

Patita

0.028

120

Kudapasi

47

282

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and

Others

Patita

0.019

121

Kudapasi

54

283

Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Dei

0.091

2664

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(4) Village – Kudapasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required for

Project in

hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

122

Kudapasi

54

284

Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Dei

0.080

123

Kudapasi

114/16

289

Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia

Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Dei

0.021

124

Kudapasi

114/16

290

Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia

Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Dei

0.022

125

Kudapasi

114/16

291

Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia

Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Dei

0.046

126

Kudapasi

114/16

292

Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia

Sahu

Taila

0.011

127

Kudapasi

114/16

293

Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia

Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Dei

0.010

128

Kudapasi

114/16

295

Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia

Sahu

Taila

0.007

129

Kudapasi

54

297

Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Dei

0.065

130

Kudapasi

114/33

298

Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Dei

0.030

131

Kudapasi

54

299

Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Dei

0.027

132

Kudapasi

114/33

300

Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.014

133

Kudapasi

54

301

Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Dei

0.029

134

Kudapasi

54

302

Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Dei

0.089

135

Kudapasi

114/16

303

Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia

Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Dei

0.037

136

Kudapasi

114/16

304

Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia

Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Dei

0.042

137

Kudapasi

114/16

305

Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia

Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Dei

0.098

138

Kudapasi

54

306

Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Dei

0.033

139

Kudapasi

54

307

Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and

Others

Taila

0.044

140

Kudapasi

114/33

309

Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.107

141

Kudapasi

114/86

317

Rathi Sethi S/o Aanand Sethi

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.036

142

Kudapasi

114/86

318

Rathi Sethi S/o Aanand Sethi

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.016

143

Kudapasi

114/73

319

Sarojini Naik W/o Ajya Naik

Patita

0.053

144

Kudapasi

114/33

320

Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.255

145

Kudapasi

47

347

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and

Others

Taila

0.043

146

Kudapasi

47

348

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and

Others

Taila

0.106

147

Kudapasi

47

349

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and

Sarada

0.230

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2665

(4) Village – Kudapasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required for

Project in

hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

Others

Anajalasachita Tini

148

Kudapasi

47

350

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.065

149

Kudapasi

47

351

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.186

150

Kudapasi

47

352

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and

Others

Patita

0.018

151

Kudapasi

47

353

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.157

152

Kudapasi

47

354

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.143

153

Kudapasi

47

355

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and

Others

Patita

0.040

154

Kudapasi

47

356

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.121

155

Kudapasi

47

357

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and

Others

Patita

0.029

156

Kudapasi

47

358

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.127

157

Kudapasi

47

359

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and

Others

Patita

0.028

158

Kudapasi

47

360

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.116

159

Kudapasi

47

361

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.121

160

Kudapasi

114/24

364

Baishnab Rout S/o Purna Chandra

Rout

Taila

0.155

161

Kudapasi

114/24

365

Baishnab Rout S/o Purna Chandra

Rout

Taila

0.126

162

Kudapasi

99

367

Sarthi Pradhan S/o Siba pradhan

Taila

0.182

163

Kudapasi

46

370

Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni sahu

Taila

0.259

164

Kudapasi

114/79

371

Manoj Kumar Sahu S/o Gaura

Chandra Sahu

Taila

0.082

165

Kudapasi

88

375

Mahi Dehury S/o Ram Dehury

Taila

0.101

166

Kudapasi

10

377

Kalpataru Dehury S/o Ram Dehury

and Others

Taila

0.114

167

Kudapasi

10

378

Kalpataru Dehury S/o Ram Dehury

and Others

Taila

0.319

168

Kudapasi

114/29

379

Jogendra Mallick S/o Narottam

Mallick

Taila

0.251

169

Kudapasi

58

380

Palau Sahu S/o Natabar Sahu and

Others

Taila

0.397

170

Kudapasi

23

381

Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik

and Others

Taila

0.233

171

Kudapasi

57

382

Palau Sahu S/o Nata Sahu

Taila

0.211

172

Kudapasi

28

386

Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar

Matiari

Taila

0.049

173

Kudapasi

28

387

Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar

Matiari

Taila

0.081

174

Kudapasi

28

388

Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar

Taila

0.201

2666

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(4) Village – Kudapasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required for

Project in

hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

Matiari

175

Kudapasi

28

389

Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar

Matiari

Taila

0.207

176

Kudapasi

28

390

Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar

Matiari

Taila

0.051

177

Kudapasi

28

391

Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar

Matiari

Taila

0.067

178

Kudapasi

28

392

Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar

Matiari

Taila

0.102

179

Kudapasi

28

393

Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar

Matiari

Taila

0.099

180

Kudapasi

29

395

Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar

Matiari and Others

Taila

0.110

181

Kudapasi

29

396

Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar

Matiari and Others

Taila

0.193

182

Kudapasi

29

397

Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar

Matiari and Others

Taila

0.050

183

Kudapasi

28

398

Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar

Matiari

Taila

0.046

184

Kudapasi

29

400

Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar

Matiari and Others

Taila

0.109

185

Kudapasi

29

401

Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar

Matiari and Others

Taila

0.089

186

Kudapasi

114/42

402

Pradip Pradhan S/o Trilochan

Pradhan

Taila

0.097

187

Kudapasi

114/43

404

Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Taila

0.164

188

Kudapasi

24

405

Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik

and Others

Taila

0.176

189

Kudapasi

24

406

Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik

and Others

Taila

0.081

190

Kudapasi

24

407

Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik

and Others

Taila

0.038

191

Kudapasi

71

408

Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu

and Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.031

192

Kudapasi

71

409

Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu

and Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.016

193

Kudapasi

71

410

Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu

and Others

Taila

0.019

194

Kudapasi

24

411

Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik

and Others

Taila

0.040

195

Kudapasi

24

412

Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik

and Others

Taila

0.070

196

Kudapasi

24

413

Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik

and Others

Taila

0.029

197

Kudapasi

24

414

Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik

and Others

Taila

0.064

198

Kudapasi

24

415

Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik

and Others

Taila

0.087

199

Kudapasi

24

416

Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik

Taila

0.059

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2667

(4) Village – Kudapasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required for

Project in

hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

and Others

200

Kudapasi

71

417

Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu

and Others

Taila

0.057

201

Kudapasi

71

418

Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu

and Others

Taila

0.043

202

Kudapasi

11

420

Kalandi Shau S/o Sadhaba Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.229

203

Kudapasi

70

421

Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.156

204

Kudapasi

70

422

Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni sahu

Patita

0.020

205

Kudapasi

70

423

Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.160

206

Kudapasi

70

424

Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni sahu

Patita

0.027

207

Kudapasi

114/27

425

Srimata kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.056

208

Kudapasi

114/27

426

Srimata kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Taila

0.162

209

Kudapasi

12

427

Kulamani Naik S/o Bairagi Naik

Taila

0.149

210

Kudapasi

114/33

428

Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Taila

0.035

211

Kudapasi

114/33

429

Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.032

212

Kudapasi

53

430

Patitapaban Naik S/o Jaykrushna

Naik

Taila

0.064

213

Kudapasi

12

431

Kulamani Naik S/o Bairagi Naik

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.062

214

Kudapasi

12

432

Kulamani Naik S/o Bairagi Naik

Taila

0.053

215

Kudapasi

114/48

434

Dhirendra Sahu S/o Pabitra Sahu

Taila

0.018

216

Kudapasi

114/50

435

Pradeep Sahu S/o Jayakrishna

Sahu

Taila

0.037

217

Kudapasi

71

437

Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu

and Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.355

218

Kudapasi

71

438

Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu

and Others

Taila

0.065

219

Kudapasi

114/48

439

Dhirendra Sahu S/o Pabitra Sahu

Taila

0.056

220

Kudapasi

114/48

440

Dhirendra Sahu S/o Pabitra Sahu

Taila

0.036

221

Kudapasi

114/50

441

Pradeep Sahu S/o Jayakrishna

Sahu

Taila

0.070

222

Kudapasi

114/49

442

Khitis Chandra Sahu S/o

Jayakishna Sahu

Taila

0.032

223

Kudapasi

114/49

443

Khitis Chandra Sahu S/o

Jayakishna Sahu

Taila

0.023

224

Kudapasi

114/49

444

Khitis Chandra Sahu S/o

Jayakishna Sahu

Taila

0.045

225

Kudapasi

114/49

445

Khitis Chandra Sahu S/o

Jayakishna Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.029

226

Kudapasi

114/45

446

Managovinda Sahu S/o

Durjyadhana Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.041

2668

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(4) Village – Kudapasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required for

Project in

hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

227

Kudapasi

109

447

Sukhila Sahu S/o Baira Sahu and

Others

Taila

0.023

228

Kudapasi

109

448

Sukhila Sahu S/o Baira Sahu and

Others

Taila

0.025

229

Kudapasi

109

449

Sukhila Sahu S/o Baira Sahu and

Others

Taila

0.015

230

Kudapasi

109

450

Sukhila Sahu S/o Baira Sahu and

Others

Taila

0.021

231

Kudapasi

43

452

Nilamani Sahu S/o Hari sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.041

232

Kudapasi

43

453

Nilamani Sahu S/o Hari sahu

Taila

0.018

233

Kudapasi

114/43

454

Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Taila

0.050

234

Kudapasi

114/43

499

Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Taila

0.018

235

Kudapasi

108

500

Sukanti Naik W/o Chaitanya Naik

Taila

0.141

236

Kudapasi

114/43

501

Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Taila

0.022

237

Kudapasi

114/43

502

Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Taila

0.037

238

Kudapasi

114/43

503

Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Taila

0.053

239

Kudapasi

24

504

Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik

and Others

Taila

0.061

240

Kudapasi

114/43

505

Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Taila

0.058

241

Kudapasi

114/43

506

Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Taila

0.040

242

Kudapasi

114/43

507

Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Taila

0.072

243

Kudapasi

52

531

Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.050

244

Kudapasi

52

532

Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.077

245

Kudapasi

52

533

Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.014

246

Kudapasi

52

534

Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.062

247

Kudapasi

52

535

Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.103

248

Kudapasi

52

536

Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.119

249

Kudapasi

52

537

Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu

Patita

0.025

250

Kudapasi

114/48

538

Dhirendra Sahu S/o Pabitra Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.025

251

Kudapasi

114/45

539

Managovinda Sahu S/o

Durjyadhana Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.070

252

Kudapasi

50

540

Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.039

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2669

(4) Village – Kudapasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required for

Project in

hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

253

Kudapasi

77

541

Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.018

254

Kudapasi

77

542

Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.018

255

Kudapasi

77

543

Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.009

256

Kudapasi

50

544

Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.011

257

Kudapasi

95

545

Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.012

258

Kudapasi

50

546

Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.015

259

Kudapasi

50

547

Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.012

260

Kudapasi

95

548

Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.022

261

Kudapasi

95

549

Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.022

262

Kudapasi

50

550

Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.084

263

Kudapasi

77

551

Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.081

264

Kudapasi

114

552

Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.027

265

Kudapasi

50

553

Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.035

266

Kudapasi

114/26

554

Dhobei Sahu S/o Hadibandhu Sahu

and Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.020

267

Kudapasi

61

555

Pradeshi Majhi S/o Nimei Majhi

and Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.094

268

Kudapasi

77

556

Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.097

269

Kudapasi

114

557

Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.132

270

Kudapasi

77

558

Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.044

271

Kudapasi

114

559

Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.013

272

Kudapasi

114

560

Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.027

273

Kudapasi

61

561

Pradeshi Majhi S/o Nimei Majhi

and Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.041

274

Kudapasi

114

562

Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.036

275

Kudapasi

77

563

Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.034

276

Kudapasi

114

564

Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.046

277

Kudapasi

77

565

Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.094

2670

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(4) Village – Kudapasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required for

Project in

hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

278

Kudapasi

50

566

Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.077

279

Kudapasi

50

567

Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.060

280

Kudapasi

50

568

Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.016

281

Kudapasi

50

569

Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.016

282

Kudapasi

50

570

Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.011

283

Kudapasi

50

571

Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.021

284

Kudapasi

95

572

Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.032

285

Kudapasi

95

573

Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.016

286

Kudapasi

114/26

574

Dhobei Sahu S/o Hadibandhu Sahu

and Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.020

287

Kudapasi

95

575

Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.036

288

Kudapasi

95

576

Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.122

289

Kudapasi

95

577

Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and

Others

Patita

0.007

290

Kudapasi

80

582

Bairagi Sahu S/o Budhiya Sahu

and Others

Taila

0.055

291

Kudapasi

80

583

Bairagi Sahu S/o Budhiya Sahu

and Others

Patita

0.036

292

Kudapasi

80

584

Bairagi Sahu S/o Budhiya Sahu

and Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.148

293

Kudapasi

80

585

Bairagi Sahu S/o Budhiya Sahu

and Others

Taila

0.027

294

Kudapasi

80

586

Bairagi Sahu S/o Budhiya Sahu

and Others

Taila

0.031

295

Kudapasi

80

587

Bairagi Sahu S/o Budhiya Sahu

and Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.035

296

Kudapasi

17

594

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.052

297

Kudapasi

4

595

Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu

Taila

0.025

298

Kudapasi

4

596

Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.053

299

Kudapasi

4

597

Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.059

300

Kudapasi

4

598

Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu

Taila

0.048

301

Kudapasi

17

599

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu

Taila

0.091

302

Kudapasi

17

606

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.058

303

Kudapasi

17

607

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu

Taila

0.039

304

Kudapasi

4

616

Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu

Taila

0.040

305

Kudapasi

17

617

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu

Taila

0.031

306

Kudapasi

22

618

Chandra Sahu S/o Bhagaban Sahu

Taila

0.031

307

Kudapasi

22

619

Chandra Sahu S/o Bhagaban Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.072

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2671

(4) Village – Kudapasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required for

Project in

hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

308

Kudapasi

22

620

Chandra Sahu S/o Bhagaban Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.034

309

Kudapasi

114

621

Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.090

310

Kudapasi

17

622

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu

Taila

0.093

311

Kudapasi

4

623

Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu

Taila

0.072

312

Kudapasi

22

624

Chandra Sahu S/o Bhagaban Sahu

Taila

0.018

313

Kudapasi

22

625

Chandra Sahu S/o Bhagaban Sahu

Taila

0.019

314

Kudapasi

17

626

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu

Taila

0.022

315

Kudapasi

17

627

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu

Taila

0.030

316

Kudapasi

4

628

Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu

Taila

0.022

317

Kudapasi

18

629

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and

Others

Taila

0.049

318

Kudapasi

18

630

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and

Others

Taila

0.018

319

Kudapasi

18

632

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and

Others

Taila

0.045

320

Kudapasi

33

633

Dukhia Sahu S/o Mahan Sahu

Taila

0.072

321

Kudapasi

65

637

Paluni Sahu W/o Mohan Sahu

Taila

0.119

322

Kudapasi

18

638

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and

Others

Taila

0.035

323

Kudapasi

18

639

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and

Others

Taila

0.066

324

Kudapasi

18

640

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and

Others

Taila

0.064

325

Kudapasi

18

641

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and

Others

Taila

0.070

326

Kudapasi

18

642

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and

Others

Taila

0.011

327

Kudapasi

18

643

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and

Others

Taila

0.012

328

Kudapasi

18

644

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and

Others

Taila

0.011

329

Kudapasi

18

645

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and

Others

Taila

0.008

330

Kudapasi

18

646

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and

Others

Taila

0.028

331

Kudapasi

18

647

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and

Others

Taila

0.013

332

Kudapasi

18

648

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and

Others

Taila

0.025

333

Kudapasi

18

649

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and

Others

Taila

0.031

334

Kudapasi

18

650

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and

Others

Taila

0.059

335

Kudapasi

18

651

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.042

336

Kudapasi

18

652

Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.043

337

Kudapasi

65

659

Paluni Sahu W/o Mohan Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.127

338

Kudapasi

65

660

Paluni Sahu W/o Mohan Sahu

Taila

0.097

339

Kudapasi

33

661

Dukhia Sahu S/o Mahan Sahu

Taila

0.109

2672

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(4) Village – Kudapasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required for

Project in

hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

340

Kudapasi

113

671

Hari Mahji S/o Duari Mahji

Patita

0.042

341

Kudapasi

113

672

Hari Mahji S/o Duari Mahji

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.040

342

Kudapasi

64

674

Prahalad sahu S/o Panchu Sahu

Taila

0.445

343

Kudapasi

114/82

675

Surendra Chandra mali S/o Nilay

mali

Taila

0.167

344

Kudapasi

32

676

Dahana Naik S/o Chandal Naik

Taila

0.387

345

Kudapasi

92

682

Rasananda Sahu S/o Buddhia

Majhi and Others

Taila

0.090

346

Kudapasi

113

686

Hari Mahji S/o Duari Mahji

Taila

0.115

347

Kudapasi

113

688

Hari Mahji S/o Duari Mahji

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.174

348

Kudapasi

113

689

Hari Mahji S/o Duari Mahji

Taila

0.020

349

Kudapasi

78

692

Budhia Sahu S/o Anand Sahu

Taila

0.001

350

Kudapasi

4

738

Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu

Taila

0.023

351

Kudapasi

22

739

Chandra Sahu S/o Bhagaban Sahu

Taila

0.031

352

Kudapasi

15

955

Keshab Sahu S/o Jagei sahu and

Others

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.011

353

Kudapasi

114/31

956

Bhaghirathi Behera S/o Nabaghana

Behera

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.001

354

Kudapasi

97

1227

Lochan Sahu S/o Jadu Sahu

Taila

0.184

355

Kudapasi

53

1233

Patitapaban Naik S/o Jaykrushna

Naik

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.040

356

Kudapasi

103

1234

Srinibas Naik S/o Balak Naik

Taila

0.247

357

Kudapasi

114/33

1235

Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Taila

0.337

358

Kudapasi

1

1236

Abhiram Naik S/o Balak Naik

Taila

0.241

359

Kudapasi

114/71

1237

Vinay Kumar Behera S/o Sushant

Kumar Behera and Others

Taila

0.320

360

Kudapasi

114/25

1238

Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Taila

0.161

361

Kudapasi

67

1239

Pitambar Naik S/o Balak Naik

Taila

0.147

362

Kudapasi

67

1240

Pitambar Naik S/o Balak Naik

Taila

0.102

363

Kudapasi

67

1243

Pitambar Naik S/o Balak Naik

Taila

0.015

364

Kudapasi

114/84

1244

Satyabhama Sethi W/o

Ghanashyam Sethi

Taila

0.082

365

Kudapasi

1

1246

Abhiram Naik S/o Balak Naik

Taila

0.132

366

Kudapasi

1

1247

Abhiram Naik S/o Balak Naik

Taila

0.031

367

Kudapasi

1

1248

Abhiram Naik S/o Balak Naik

Taila

0.230

368

Kudapasi

5

1249

Uchhaba Naik S/o Balak Naik and

Others

Taila

0.158

369

Kudapasi

114/41

1250

Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnab Naik

Taila

0.088

370

Kudapasi

5

1251

Uchhaba Naik S/o Balak Naik and

Others

Taila

0.075

371

Kudapasi

114/18

1253

Manorajan Naik S/o Chaitanya

Naik

Taila

0.091

372

Kudapasi

114/33

1254

Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Taila

0.036

373

Kudapasi

114/33

1255

Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Taila

0.057

374

Kudapasi

114/33

1256

Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Taila

0.193

375

Kudapasi

13

1258

Keshaba Sahu S/o Kungei Sahu

Taila

0.206

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2673

(4) Village – Kudapasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required for

Project in

hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

376

Kudapasi

89

1259

Ramesh Sahu S/o Nabei Sahu

Taila

0.074

377

Kudapasi

89

1260

Ramesh Sahu S/o Nabei Sahu

Taila

0.094

378

Kudapasi

40

1261

Nalu sahu S/o Bauri sahu

Taila

0.164

379

Kudapasi

114/29

1262

Jogendra Mallick S/o Narottam

Mallick

Taila

0.350

380

Kudapasi

114/69

1263

Durga Charan nayak S/o

Patitapawan Nayak

Gharabari

0.025

381

Kudapasi

93

1265

Ram Sethy S/o Dukhu Sethy

Gharabari

0.020

382

Kudapasi

63

1266

Prahlad Majhi S/o Bauri Majhi

Gharabari

0.022

383

Kudapasi

86

1268

Bholeswar Sahu S/o Banguru

Sahu

Gharabari

0.020

384

Kudapasi

42

1269

Niranjan Majhi S/o Bira Majhi

Gharabari

0.017

385

Kudapasi

41

1271

Nimei Majhi S/o Thaka Majhi

Gharabari

0.020

386

Kudapasi

114/77

1272

Bhallabh Chandra Pradhan S/o

Haldhar Pradhan

Gharabari

0.019

387

Kudapasi

6

1274

Kastu Bagha S/o Kamar Bagha

Gharabari

0.015

388

Kudapasi

96

1275

Lachhaman Sahu S/o Panchu Sahu

Gharabari

0.018

389

Kudapasi

90

1277

Ramesh Naik S/o Kalia Naik

Gharabari

0.017

390

Kudapasi

35

1282

Dolagovinda Sahu S/o Nabei Sahu

Gharabari

0.020

391

Kudapasi

89

1284

Ramesh Sahu S/o Nabei Sahu

Gharabari

0.019

392

Kudapasi

114/22

1286

Panchali Barik W/o Prabhat Kiran

Barik

Gharabari

0.015

393

Kudapasi

114/37

1288

Kaushalya Behera W/o Sujit

Behera

Gharabari

0.016

394

Kudapasi

55

1291

Pabitra Sahu S/o Pathani Sahu

Gharabari

0.014

395

Kudapasi

34

1293

Duruju Sahu S/o Pathani Sahu

Gharabari

0.012

396

Kudapasi

98

1295

Sarbeswar Matiari S/o Laxmi Dhar

Matiari

Gharabari

0.021

397

Kudapasi

112

1297

Sushant Pradhan S/o Nimei

Pradhan and Others

Gharabari

0.018

398

Kudapasi

114/6

1300

Chitanya Naik S/o Vishnaba Naik

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.123

399

Kudapasi

114/7

1301

Khiroda Kumar Maharana S/o Jatia

Maharana

Taila

0.081

400

Kudapasi

114/8

1302

Panchali Barik W/o Prabhat Kiran

Barik

Taila

0.061

401

Kudapasi

114/41

1303

Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnab Naik

Taila

0.090

402

Kudapasi

114/11

1304

Dharmapada Sahu S/o Panchu

Sahu

Taila

0.138

403

Kudapasi

114/11

1305

Dharmapada Sahu S/o Panchu

Sahu

Taila

0.114

404

Kudapasi

114/12

1306

Patitapaban Naik S/o Jayakrushna

Naik

Taila

0.081

405

Kudapasi

114/13

1307

Manmohan Sahu S/o Sukru Sahu

Taila

0.057

406

Kudapasi

114/16

1308

Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia

Sahu

Taila

0.045

407

Kudapasi

114/33

1309

Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Taila

0.231

408

Kudapasi

114/30

1314

Vishnaba Rauta S/o Purna Chandra

Rauta

Taila

0.093

409

Kudapasi

114/33

1316

Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Taila

0.164

2674

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(4) Village – Kudapasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required for

Project in

hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

410

Kudapasi

114/33

1317

Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.129

411

Kudapasi

114/30

1318

Vishnaba Rauta S/o Purna Chandra

Rauta

Taila

0.201

412

Kudapasi

114/34

1319

Pramila Naik S/o Kirtan Naik

Taila

0.237

413

Kudapasi

114/38

1320

Binod Kumar Sahu S/o

Madhusudhan Sahu

Taila

0.090

414

Kudapasi

114/19

1321

Ganya ranjan Naik S/o Chitanya

Naik

Taila

0.158

415

Kudapasi

114/39

1322

Alok Kumar Sahu S/o

Rudramohan Sahu

Taila

0.066

416

Kudapasi

114/45

1324

Managovinda Sahu S/o

Durjyadhana Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.036

417

Kudapasi

114/46

1325

Narayana Sahu S/o Pranabandhu

Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.049

418

Kudapasi

114/46

1326

Narayana Sahu S/o Pranabandhu

Sahu

Taila

0.017

419

Kudapasi

114/47

1327

Sibarama Sahu S/o Pabitra Sahu

Taila

0.010

420

Kudapasi

114/47

1328

Sibarama Sahu S/o Pabitra Sahu

Taila

0.005

421

Kudapasi

114/51

1329

Sasmitarani Pradhan W/o Umakant

Majhi

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.184

422

Kudapasi

114/53

1330

Rasmita Sahu W/o Pradip Kumar

Pradhan

Taila

0.074

423

Kudapasi

114/54

1331

Ajit Kumar Dehuri S/o Duryadhan

Dehuri

Taila

0.045

424

Kudapasi

114/57

1333

Pitabas Sahu S/o Gaura Sahu

Taila

0.049

425

Kudapasi

114/58

1334

Sarathi Sahu S/o Gaura Sahu

Taila

0.046

426

Kudapasi

114/59

1335

Srinibas Sahu S/o Gaura Sahu

Taila

0.048

427

Kudapasi

114/60

1336

Surath Sahu S/o Gaura Sahu

Taila

0.038

428

Kudapasi

114/61

1337

Rakesh Ranjan Rauta S/o Prafful

Kumar Rauta

Taila

0.101

429

Kudapasi

114/63

1338

Rajkishor Dehuri S/o Maheswar

Dehuri

Taila

0.159

430

Kudapasi

114/81

1339

Prasant Kumar Sahu S/o

Netrananda Sahu

Taila

0.120

431

Kudapasi

114/64

1340

Santwona Mishra W/o Narendra

Kumar Mishra

Taila

0.048

432

Kudapasi

114/66

1341

Deba Sahu S/o Budhia Sahu

Taila

0.056

433

Kudapasi

114/66

1342

Deba Sahu S/o Budhia Sahu

Taila

0.018

434

Kudapasi

114/66

1343

Deba Sahu S/o Budhia Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.060

435

Kudapasi

114/67

1344

Chinmaya Kumar Behera S/o

Susant Kumar Behera

Taila

0.159

436

Kudapasi

114/68

1345

Binya Kumar Behera S/o Susant

Kumar Behera

Taila

0.119

437

Kudapasi

114/68

1346

Binya Kumar Behera S/o Susant

Kumar Behera

Taila

0.014

438

Kudapasi

114/68

1347

Binya Kumar Behera S/o Susant

Kumar Behera

Taila

0.067

439

Kudapasi

114/70

1348

Susant Kumar Sahu S/o

Rudramohan Sahu

Taila

0.035

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2675

(4) Village – Kudapasi

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area

Required for

Project in

hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

440

Kudapasi

114/39

1349

Alok Kumar Sahu S/o

Rudramohan Sahu

Taila

0.042

441

Kudapasi

114/73

1350

Sarojini Naik W/o Ajya Naik

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.015

442

Kudapasi

114/74

1351

Tikan Sahu S/o Dujyadhan Sahu

Taila

0.111

443

Kudapasi

114/75

1352

Tuna Behera S/o Prakash Behera

Taila

0.096

444

Kudapasi

114/76

1353

Binya Kumar Behera S/o Susant

Kumar Behera and Others

Taila

0.385

445

Kudapasi

114/78

1354

Arun Pradhan S/o Mohan Pradhan

Taila

0.105

446

Kudapasi

114/85

1356

Karunakar Mahapatra S/o

Chandramani Mahapatra

Taila

0.097

447

Kudapasi

84

1357

Bhagirathi Majhi S/o Bira Majhi

and Others

Gharabari

0.011

448

Kudapasi

114/87

1358

Satyananda Pradhan S/o

Ghanashyama Pradhan and Others

Taila

0.125

449

Kudapasi

114/88

1359

Uddhab Sahu S/o Narottam Sahu

Sarada

Anajalasachita Tini

0.009

450

Kudapasi

114/89

1360

Ranjan Behera S/o Ramesh Behera

Taila

0.036

451

Kudapasi

114/90

1361

Rajat Kumar Behera S/o Ramesh

Behera

Taila

0.035

Total :

Village – Kudapasi

42.488

(5) Village – Dhaurakhaman

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area Required

for Project in

hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

1

Dhaurakhaman

11

5

Ghurudu Sahu S/o Butu Sahu

Taila

0.441

2

Dhaurakhaman

43

10

Sudaie Sethi S/o Nanda Sethi

Taila

0.237

3

Dhaurakhaman

43

11

Sudaie Sethi S/o Nanda Sethi

Taila

0.340

4

Dhaurakhaman

43

12

Sudaie Sethi S/o Nanda Sethi

Taila

0.194

5

Dhaurakhaman

45/17

13

Manas Ranjan Swain S/o Prahlad

Swain

Taila

0.771

6

Dhaurakhaman

45/12

15

Village community land in the

name of President, Brahmanbil.

Taila

0.748

7

Dhaurakhaman

8

16

Kasturi Sahu S/o Arkhita Dehuri

and Others

Taila

0.071

8

Dhaurakhaman

45/19

17

Baisnaba Rout S/o Purna Chandra

Rout

Taila

0.149

9

Dhaurakhaman

45/19

18

Baisnaba Rout S/o Purna Chandra

Rout

Taila

0.121

10

Dhaurakhaman

45/42

20

Sudarshan Dehuri S/o Dangi

Dehuri

Taila

0.375

11

Dhaurakhaman

24

21

Balakrishna Sahu S/o Bhagabat

Sahu and Others

Taila

0.358

12

Dhaurakhaman

28

40

Bairagi Sahu D/o Sabar Sahu

Taila

0.479

13

Dhaurakhaman

24

53

Balakrishna Sahu S/o Bhagabat

Sahu and Others

Taila

1.637

14

Dhaurakhaman

45/12

54

Village community land in the

name of President, Brahmanbil.

Taila

0.022

15

Dhaurakhaman

45/17

84

Manas Ranjan Swain S/o Prahlad

Swain

Taila

0.267

2676

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(5) Village – Dhaurakhaman

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area Required

for Project in

hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

16

Dhaurakhaman

35

85

Milu Behera S/o Haldhar behera

Taila

0.072

17

Dhaurakhaman

45/45

86

Prafulla Kumar Sethi S/o Bauri

Bandhu Sethi

Taila

0.101

18

Dhaurakhaman

45/41

87

Vinay Kumar Behera S/o Sushant

Kumar Behera and Others

Taila

0.307

19

Dhaurakhaman

45/12

92

Village community land in the

name of President, Brahmanbil.

Taila

0.622

20

Dhaurakhaman

45/12

93

Village community land in the

name of President, Brahmanbil.

Taila

0.065

21

Dhaurakhaman

2

94

Antaryami Sahu S/o Dhani Sahu

Taila

0.079

22

Dhaurakhaman

20

98

Punia Sahu D/o Damburu Sahu

Taila

0.136

23

Dhaurakhaman

22

99

Bauribandhu Dehuri s/o Panu

Dehuri

Taila

0.101

24

Dhaurakhaman

20

103

Punia Sahu D/o Damburu Sahu

Taila

0.170

25

Dhaurakhaman

45/17

104

Manas Ranjan Swain S/o Prahlad

Swain

Taila

0.245

26

Dhaurakhaman

45/50

105

Vishnu Behera S/o Deenbandhu

Behera

Taila

0.039

27

Dhaurakhaman

14

224

Jay Krishna Pradhan S/o Daitari

Pradhan

Sarada

Jalasachita

Ek Fasali

0.153

28

Dhaurakhaman

45/2

563

Bhagirati Sahoo S/o Nepala

Sahoo and Others

Taila

0.037

29

Dhaurakhaman

45/3

566

Pranati Barik W/o Narayana Barik

Taila

0.096

30

Dhaurakhaman

45/4

567

Pravati Barik W/o Akhya Kumar

Barik

Taila

0.036

31

Dhaurakhaman

45/8

571

Pravat Kiran Barik S/o Anukul

Barik

Taila

0.036

32

Dhaurakhaman

45/11

574

Panchali Barik W/o Pravat Kiran

Barik

Taila

0.026

33

Dhaurakhaman

45/12

575

Village community land in the

name of President, Brahmanbil.

Taila

0.347

34

Dhaurakhaman

45/12

578

Village community land in the

name of President, Brahmanbil.

Taila

0.521

35

Dhaurakhaman

45/12

579

Village community land in the

name of President, Brahmanbil.

Taila

0.129

36

Dhaurakhaman

45/13

580

Binodini Rauta W/o Vishnaba

Rauta

Taila

0.151

37

Dhaurakhaman

45/14

581

Basant Kumar Sahu S/o

Bidyadhar Sahu

Taila

0.049

38

Dhaurakhaman

45/15

582

Tikili Behera W/o Dambaru

Behera

Taila

0.142

39

Dhaurakhaman

45/17

584

Manas Ranjan Swain S/o Prahlad

Swain

Taila

0.343

40

Dhaurakhaman

45/19

587

Baisnaba Rout S/o Purna Chandra

Rout

Taila

0.120

41

Dhaurakhaman

45/21

588

Village community land in the

name of President, Brahmanbil.

Taila

0.595

42

Dhaurakhaman

45/23

589

Srimant Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Taila

0.102

43

Dhaurakhaman

45/23

590

Srimant Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Taila

0.194

44

Dhaurakhaman

45/23

591

Srimant Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Charan Sahu

Taila

0.101

45

Dhaurakhaman

45/23

592

Srimant Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu

Taila

0.194

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2677

(5) Village – Dhaurakhaman

Non-Forest Land (Private)

Sl.

No.

R.I Circle/

village

Khata

No.

Plot

No.

Name of the Tenant

Kissam

Area Required

for Project in

hectare

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

Charan Sahu

46

Dhaurakhaman

45/29

598

Dipendu Kumar Pradhan S/o

Jadumani Pradhan

Taila

0.114

47

Dhaurakhaman

45/31

600

Dhirendra Kumar Sahu S/o Bhask

Sahu and Others

Taila

0.440

48

Dhaurakhaman

45/49

612

Diptirani Barik W/o Barun Kumar

Barik

Taila

0.024

Total:

Village - Dhaurakhaman

12.099

Boundary Description:

The Naini Coal Block Boundary starts from Point No.1 which is located by the side of State Highway No. 63 and on the

south bank of Gauduni Nala. Whence the boundary moves forward in South-East direction along the State Highway

No.63 (towards Angul Town) up to point No.29. From point No.29 to Point No.136 the boundary takes left turn

towards North-East direction, moving across the CHHENDIPADA RF and to reach point No.136, located on the R F

boundary. From Point No.136 to Point No.A the boundary moved further North-East direction across the village

TENTULOI GOPINATHAPUR passing through Survey No.195, 194, 193, 201, 200. From Point No.A to Point No. C

the boundary moved further North-East direction across the village KASIDIHA passing through Survey No.36, 34, 33,

3092, 32, 30, 24, 23, 20, 17. From Point No.C to Point No.E the boundary moved further North-East direction across the

village THALIPASI passing through Survey No.20, 19, 18, 66, 68, 64, 63, 52, 119, 120, 229, 233, 234, 237, 238, 241,

242, 245, 247, 250, 437, 436, 432, 433, 434, 449, 471, 472, 476, 561, 551, 552, 553, 550, 548, 547, 546. From Point

No.E to Point No.I the boundary moved further North-East direction across the village KUDAPASI passing through

Survey. No. 678, 679, 680, 681, 682, 685, 686, 687, 689, 692, 691, 635, 634, 633, 632, 631, 737, 741, 769, 809, 807,

802, 803, 797, 796, 795, 784, 955, 956, 531, 530, 529, 527, 523, 499, 500, 492, 467, 1224, 462, 461. From Point No.I to

Point No.30 the boundary moved further North-East direction across the village DHAURAKHAMAN passing through

Survey No. 222, 223, 224, 226, 225, 213, 226, 257, 256, 255, 260, 268, 269. From Point No.30 to Point No.31 the

boundary takes left turn towards North-West direction across the village DHAURAKHAMAN passing through Survey.

No. 269, 268, 270, 266, 265, 262, 181, 180, 178, 179, 176, 105, 566, 567, 102, 85, 84, 54, 53, 21, 20 and touching the

CHHENDIPADA RF boundary at Point No.31. From Point No.31 to Point No.35 the boundary further moved in North-

West direction across the CHHENDIPADA RF to meet the Point No.35 located on the RF boundary. From Point No.35

to point No.1 the Boundary takes left turn towards South-West direction along the south bank of Gauduni Nala towards

upstream and closed at Point No.1 whence the boundary started.

(1) Village: TENTULOI GOPINATHAPUR : Boundary bounded by Point No.136, A and B.

The village boundary line starts from Point No.136, which is situated close to the tri-junction point, touching the

CHHENDIPADA RF boundary and block boundary at Survey No.195. From Point No.136 to Point No. A, the block

boundary moved towards North-East direction across the village TENTULOI GOPINATHAPUR passing through

Survey No.195, 194, 193, 201, 200 touching the village boundary at North-East end at Survey No.200. From Point No.A

to Point No.B the village boundary moved in North-East direction covering the Survey No.200, 199, 195 and touching

the Chhendipada RF boundary at Point No.B. From Point No.B to Point No.136 it is common boundary between

TENTULOI GOPINATHAPUR village and CHHENDIPADA RF.

(2) Village: KASIDIHA: Boundary bounded by Point No. A, C, D, and B.

The village boundary line starts from Point No. A, which is situated at common point for Survey No.36 and Survey

No.34. From Point No.A to Point No.C, the block boundary moved towards North-East direction across the village

KASIDIHA passing through Survey No. 36, 34, 33, 3092, 32, 30, 24, 23, 20, 17 touching the village boundary at North-

East end at Survey No.17. From point No.C to Point No.D the village boundary moved in North-West direction

covering the Survey No. 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 3176, 5 and passing through tri-junction point, and

moved along Survey No. 2, 1, touching the CHHENDIPADA RF boundary at Point. No.D. From point No.D to Point

No.B it is a common boundary between KASIDIHA village and CHHENDIPADA RF. The village boundary from Point

No.B to Point No.A moves in South-West direction covering the Survey No.1, 30, 31, 32, 36 and closing the boundary

at Point No.A.

(3) Village: THALIPASI : Boundary bounded by Point No. C, E, F, G and D.

The village boundary line starts from Point No. C, which is situated at Survey No.20. From Point No.C to Point No.E,

the block boundary moved towards North-East direction across the village THALIPASI passing through Survey No.20,

19, 18, 66, 68, 64, 63, 52, 119, 120, 229, 233, 234, 237, 238, 241, 242, 245, 247, 250, 437, 436, 432, 433, 434, 449, 471,

472, 476, 561, 551, 552, 553, 550, 548, 547 and 546 touching the village boundary at North-East end at Survey No.546.

From point No.E to Point No.F the village boundary moved in North-West direction covering the Survey No.546, 545,

542, 541, 538, 537, 536, 533, 532, 531, 530, 528, 527, 526, 525, 524, 523. From point No.F to Point No.G the village

boundary moved in West direction covering Survey No.510, 509, 498, 414, 413, 412, 411, 410, 409, 408, 407, 406, 403,

2678

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

402, 401, 119, 96, 93, 89, 86, 85, and 1 touching the CHHENDIPADA RF boundary at Point. No.G. From Point No.G

to Point No.D it is common boundary between THALIPASI village and CHHENDIPADA RF. From Point No.D to

Point No.C the village boundary moved in South-East direction covering the Survey No.1, 2, 3, 578, 577, 11, 15, 16, 17,

18, 20 and closing the boundary at Point No. C.

(4) Village: BIMBADHARAPUR : Boundary bounded by Point No.G, F and H.

The village boundary line starts from Point No.G which is close to tri-junction point and touching the

CHHENDIPADA RF BOUNDARY. From Point No.G to Point No.F the village boundary moved in East direction

covering the Survey No. 1, 162, 163, 164, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 367,

368, 369, 370, 372, 373, 378, 379. From Point No.F to Point No.H the village boundary moved in North-West direction

covering the Survey No.387, 379, 378, 377, 376, 375, 364, tri-junction point, 363, 362, 353, 415, 412, 352, 47, 44, 34,

392, 399, 33, 389, 430, 32, 19, 17, 4 and touching the CHHENDIPADA RF boundary at Point No.H. From Point No.H

to Point No.G it is common boundary between BIMBADHARAPUR village and CHHENDIPADA RF closing the

boundary at Point No.G.

(5) Village: KUDAPASI : Boundary bounded by Point No. E, I, J, H and F.

The village boundary line starts from Point No.E, which is situated close to the tri-junction point at Survey No.678.

From Point No.E to Point No.I the block boundary moved towards North-East direction across the village KUDAPASI

passing through Survey No.678, 679, 680, 681, 682, 685, 686, 687, 689, 692, 691, 635, 634, 633, 632, 631, 737, 741,

769, 809, 807, 802, 803, 797, 796, 795, 784, 955, 956, 531, 530, 529, 527, 523, 499, 500, 492, 467, 1224, 462, 461.

From Point No.I to Point No.J the village boundary moved in North-West direction covering the Survey No.461, tri-

junction point, 393, 392, 391, 390, 389, 388, 1318, 380, 379, 365, 364, tri-junction point, 47, 46, 44, 1230, 1229, 1228,

27 and touching the CHHENDIPADA RF boundary at Point No.J. From Point No.J to Point No.H it is common

boundary between KUDAPASI village and CHHENDIPADA RF. From Point No.H to Point No.F and Point No.E. the

village boundary moved in South-East direction covering the Survey No.1, 1316, 1234, 1235, 1353, 1236, 1237, 1, 2,

112, 113, 127, 134, 1351, tri-junction point, 1351, 1307, 138, 1322, 139, 1223, 184, 185, tri-junction point, 186, 188,

202, 1309, 204, 673, 676, 677, 678 and closing the boundary at Point No.E.

(6) Village: DHAURAKHAMAN: Boundary bounded by Point No. I, 30, 31 and J.

The village boundary line starts from Point No.I, which is situated at Survey No.222. From Point No.I to Point No.30

the block boundary moved towards North-East direction across the village DHAURAKHAMAN passing through

Survey No. 222, 223, 224, 226, 225, 213, 226, 257, 256, 255, 260, 268, 269. From Point No.30 to Point No.31 the block

boundary moved in North-West direction covering the Survey No. 269, 268, 270, 266, 265, 262, 181, 180, 178, 179,

176, 105, 566, 567, 102, 85, 84, 54, 53, 21, 20 and touching the CHHENDIPADA RF boundary at Point No.31. From

Point No.31 to Point No.J it is common boundary between DHAURAKHAMAN village and CHHENDIPADA RF.

From Point No.J to Point No.I the village boundary moved in South-East direction covering the Survey No.1, 2, 4, 558,

551, 7, 553, 552, 553, 34, 35, 36, 37, tri-junction point, 90, 91, 92, 95, 200, tri-junction point, 201, 202, 203, 219, 220,

221, tri-junction point, 222, and closing the boundary at Point No.I.

[F. No. 43015/18/2015- LA & IR]

RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Dy. Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 2 ebZ] 2019

dk

dk

dk

dk-vk

vkvk

vk- 656

656

656

656-&dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ;g izrhr gksrk gS fd] blls mikc) vuqlwph esa mfYyf[kr ifj{ks= dh

Hkwfe esa dks;yk vfHkizkIr fd, tkus dh laHkkouk gS;

vkSj] js[kkad la[;k ,lbZLkh,y@ch,lih@th,e¼ih,yth½@Hkwfe@527] rkjh[k 19 ekpZ] 2019 dk ftlesa

mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe {ks= ds C;kSjs vUrfoZ"V gS] fujh{k.k dysDVj] ftyk lqjtiqj ¼NRrhlx<+½ ds dk;kZy; esa

;k dks;yk fu;a=d] 1] dkmafly gkÅl LVªhV] dksydkrk & 700001 ds dk;kZy; esa ;k lkÅFk bZLVuZ dksyQhYM~l

fyfeVsM ¼jktLo vuqHkkx½] lhir jksM] fcykliqj&495006 ¼NÙrhlx<+½ ds dk;kZy; esa fd;k tk ldrk gSA

vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] dks;yk /kkjd {ks= ¼vtZu vkSj fodkl½ vf/kfu;e] 1957 ¼1957 dk 20½ ¼ftls

blesa blds i’pkr~ mDr vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gS½ dh /kkjk 4 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznRr ’kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs

gq,] iwoksZDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa dks;ys dk iwosZ{k.k djus ds vius vk’k; dh lwpuk nsrh gSA

mijksDr mfYyf[kr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrcn~/k dksbZ O;fDr &

¼i½

laiw.kZ Hkwfe ;k mlds fdlh Hkkx ;k ,slh Hkwfe esa ;k mlds Åij fdlh vf/kdkj ds vtZu ij vk{ksi dj

ldsxk( vFkok

¼ii½

mDr vf/klwpuk dh /kkjk 4 dh mi&/kkjk ¼3½ ds v/khu dh xbZ fdlh dk;ZokbZ ls gqbZ ;k lEHkor% gksus

okyh fdlh {kfr ds fy;s vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 ds v/khu izfrdj dk nkok dj ldsxk( vFkok

¼iii½

mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 13 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu iwosZ{k.k vuqKfIr;ksa ds izHkkoghu gksus ds laca/k esa ;k

mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 13 dh mi&/kkjk ¼4½ ds v/khu [kuu iV~Vs izHkkoghu gksus ds fy;s izfrdj dk

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2679

nkok dj ldsxk vkSj mls mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 13 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds [kaM ¼i½ ls ¼iv½ esa fofufnZ"V

enksa dh Ckkcr mixr O;; dks minf’kZr djus ds fy;s iwoksZDr Hkwfe ls lacaf/kr lHkh ekufp=ksa] pkVksZ vkSj

vU; nLrkostksa dks ifjnRr dj ldsxk]

jkti= esa bl vf/klwpuk ds izdk’ku dh rkjh[k ls uCcs fnu dh vof/k ds Hkhrj Hkkjlk/kd vf/kdkjh ;k foHkkxk/;{k

¼jktLo½] lkÅFk bZLVuZ dksyQhYM~l fyfeVsM] lhir jksM] fcykliqj&495006 ¼NRrhlx<+½ dks lqiqnZ djsxk A

vuqlwph

vuqlwph

vuqlwph

vuqlwph

egkek;k vkslhih foLrkj Cykd] HkVxkao {ks=]

egkek;k vkslhih foLrkj Cykd] HkVxkao {ks=]

egkek;k vkslhih foLrkj Cykd] HkVxkao {ks=]

egkek;k vkslhih foLrkj Cykd] HkVxkao {ks=]

ftyk& lqjtiqj ¼NRrhlx<+½

ftyk& lqjtiqj ¼NRrhlx<+½

ftyk& lqjtiqj ¼NRrhlx<+½

ftyk& lqjtiqj ¼NRrhlx<+½

[js[kkad la[;k ,lbZlh,y@ch,lih@th,e¼ih,yth½@Hkwfe@527] rkjh[k 19 ekpZ] 2019]

jktLo Hkfe%

Øe

la-

xzke dk uke

xzke la[;k

rglhy

ftyk

{ks=

gsDVj esa

fVIif.k;k

1-

tjgh

103

izrkiiqj

lqjtiqj

16.410

Hkkx

dqy % 16-410 gsDVj ¼yxHkx½ ;k 40-55 ,dM+ ¼yxHkx½

fVIi.k

fVIi.k

fVIi.k

fVIi.k % xzke tjgh ¼Hkkx½ esa vftZr fd;s tkus okys IykV la[;k% 33(Hkkx), 37@2] 38@1] 38@2] 39 ls 47] 53

ls 58] 61(Hkkx), 62(Hkkx), 66(Hkkx), 67 ls 75] 341(Hkkx), 342(Hkkx), 483(Hkkx) ls 485(Hkkx), 486@1]

486@2] 487] 488(Hkkx), 489(Hkkx), 490] 491(Hkkx), 492@1 ls 492@4] 493@1]493@2] 494 ls 497]

498(Hkkx), 500(Hkkx), 501] 507(Hkkx), 553@1(Hkkx), 553@2] 555(Hkkx), 556(Hkkx), 557] 564@1 ls

564@3] 566(Hkkx), 582(Hkkx), 583(Hkkx), 585(Hkkx), 589(Hkkx), 590(Hkkx), 591 ls 595] 596(Hkkx),

597(Hkkx), 618(Hkkx) ls 620(Hkkx), 621 ls 623] 624(Hkkx), 625(Hkkx), 637(Hkkx), 638(Hkkx),

741(Hkkx), 748(Hkkx), 749] 750(Hkkx), 751(Hkkx), 752 ls 755] 756(Hkkx), 757(Hkkx), 760(Hkkx),

772(Hkkx).

lhek o.kZu%

lhek o.kZu%

lhek o.kZu%

lhek o.kZu%

Cykd & d%

Cykd & d%

Cykd & d%

Cykd & d%

d&[k js[kk fcUnq *d* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh ds if'peh Hkkx ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq *[k* ij feyrh gSA

[k&x js[kk fcUnq *[k* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas iwohZ fn'kk ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq *x* ij feyrh gSA

x&?k js[kk fcUnq *x* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas nf{k.kh fn'kk ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq *?k* ij feyrh gSA

?k&d js[kk fcUnq *?k* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas if'peh fn'kk ls gksrh gqbZ vkjafHkd fcUnq *d* ij

feyrh gSA

Cykd & [k%

Cykd & [k%

Cykd & [k%

Cykd & [k%

³&p js[kk fcUnq *³* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas mRrjh fn'kk ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq *p* ij feyrh gSA

p&N js[kk fcUnq *p* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas iwohZ fn'kk ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq *N* ij feyrh gSA

N&t js[kk fcUnq *N* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas nf{k.kh fn'kk ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq *t* ij feyrh gSA

t&³ js[kk fcUnq *t* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas if'peh fn'kk ls gksrh gqbZ vkjafHkd fcUnq *³* ij

feyrh gSA

[Qk- la- 43015@06@2019&,y, ,.M vkbZvkj]

jke f’kjksef.k ljkst] mi lfpo

New Delhi, the 2nd May, 2019

S.O. 656.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that coal is likely to be obtained from the lands in

the locality mentioned in the Schedule annexed hereto;

And whereas, the plan bearing number SECL/BSP/GM(PLG)/LAND/527, dated the 19th March, 2019

containing details of the area of land described in the said Schedule may be inspected at the office of the Collector,

District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh) or at the office of the Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata-700001 or at

the office of the South Eastern Coalfields Limited (Revenue Section), Seepat Road, Bilaspur -495006 (Chhattisgarh).

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas

(Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the Central Government

hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal in the land described in the aforesaid Schedule.

Any person interested in the land described in the above mentioned Schedule may-

(i)

object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or of any rights in or over such land; or

2680

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(ii)

claim compensation under section 6 of the said Act for any damage caused or likely to be caused by any

action taken under sub -section (3) of section 4 of the said Act; or

(iii)

claim compensation under sub-section (1) of section 13 of the said Act, in respect of prospecting license

ceasing to have effect or under sub-section (4) of section 13 of the said Act for mining lease ceasing to have

effect and deliver all maps, charts and other documents relating to the aforesaid land to show the

expenditure incurred in respect of items specified in clauses (i) to (iv) of sub-section (1) of section 13 of

the said Act,

to the Officer-In-Charge or Head of the Department (Revenue), South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Seepat Road,

Bilaspur -495006 (Chhattisgarh) within a period of ninety days from the date of publication of this notification in the

Official Gazette.

SCHEDULE

Mahamaya OCP Extension Block, Bhatgaon Area,

District- Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)

[Plan bearing number SECL/BSP/GM (PLG)/LAND/ 527, dated the 19th March, 2019]

Revenue Land:

Sl.

No.

Name of

village

Village

number

Tahsil

District

Area

in

hectares

Remarks

1.

Jarhi

103

Pratappur

Surajpur

16.410

Part

Total: 16.410 hectares (approximately) or 40.55 acres (approximately)

Note : Plot numbers to be acquired in village Jarhi (Part): 33(P), 37/2, 38/1, 38/2, 39 to 47, 53 to 58, 61(P), 62(P),

66(P), 67 to 75, 341(P), 342(P), 483(P) to 485(P), 486/1, 486/2, 487, 488(P), 489(P), 490, 491(P), 492/1 to

492/4, 493/1, 493/2, 494 to 497,

498(P), 500(P), 501, 507(P), 553/1(P), 553/2, 555(P), 556(P), 557, 564/1

to 564/3, 566(P), 582(P), 583(P), 585(P), 589(P), 590(P), 591 to 595, 596(P), 597(P), 618(P) to 620(P), 621 to

623, 624(P), 625(P), 637(P), 638(P), 741(P), 748(P), 749, 750(P), 751(P), 752 to 755, 756(P), 757(P), 760(P),

772(P).

Boundary description:

Block – A :

A-B

Line starts from point ‘A’ and passes in village Jarhi through western part of village Jarhi and meets at point

‘B’.

B-C

Line starts from point ‘B’ and passes in village Jarhi towards eastern direction of village Jarhi, and meets at

point ‘C’.

C-D

Line starts from point ‘C’ and passes in village Jarhi towards southern direction of village Jarhi and meets at

point ‘D’.

D-A

Line starts from point ‘D’ and passes in village Jarhi towards western direction of village Jarhi and meets at

starting point ‘A’.

Block – B:

E-F

Line starts from point ‘E’ and passes in village Jarhi towards northern direction of village Jarhi, and meets at

point ‘F’.

F-G

Line starts from point ‘F’ and passes in village Jarhi towards eastern direction of village Jarhi and meets at

point ‘G’.

G-H

Line starts from point ‘G’ and passes in village Jarhi towards southern direction of village Jarhi and meets at

point ‘H’.

H-E

Line starts from point ‘H’ and passes in village Jarhi towards western direction of village Jarhi and meets at

starting point ‘E’.

[F. No. 43015/ 06 /2019-LA&IR ]

RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Dy. Secy.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2681

Je vkSj jkstxkj ea=ky;

ubZ fnYyh] 24 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 657-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14 ½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj iwoZ

mRrj jsyos izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k dkuiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 64@2017½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 24-04-2019 dks

izkIr gq, FksA

[la- ,y&41012@84@2016&vkbZvkj ¼ch&I½]

ch- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 24th April, 2019

S.O. 657.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 64/2017) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Kanpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of East North Railway and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on 24-4-2019.

[No. L-41012/84/2016-IR(B-1)]

B.S. BISHT, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAKESH KUMAR, HJS, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL–CUM-LABOR COURT, KANPUR.

ID. No. 64 of 2017

Zonal Working President,

Rail Sewak Sangh,

Through Sri D.P. Awasthi,

49, Tilak Nagar, Lucknow.

Versus

The Divisional Personnel Officer,

East North Railway,

DRM Office,

Ashok Marg,

Lucknow.

AWARD

1. Central Government, MOL, New Delhi vide notification No. L-41012/84/2016-IR (B-I) dated 10.08.2017 has

referred the following for Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

“KYA PURVOTTAR RAIL PRASHASHAN LUCKNOW DWARA SRI RAKESH KUMAR,

HELPER KHALASI KO USKI JOINING TITHI ( 25.08.98)SE SC/ST QUOTA KE TAHAT

MILNE WALI PADONNATI NA DEKAR USSE JUNIOR KO PADONNATI DIYA JANA

TATHA NYAYOCHIT AVAM VAID HAI? YADI NAHI TO KAMGAR KIS RAHAT KO

PANE KA HAQDAR HAI?”

2. After receipt of reference order from Ministry of Labor and Employment, New Delhi registered notices dated

11.09.2017 were issued from this Tribunal to the parties for filing their respective claim and counter claim

fixing 20.10.2017. But since Presiding Officer was on tour on 20.10.17, the case was adjourned to 19.01.18,

still no claim petition was filed in the case on 19.01.2018. Again on 22.01.19, the case was taken up for

hearing but when none appeared from the side of the contesting parties it was ordered that registered notices

be issued to the contesting parties for filing of their claim and counter claim petition in the case on behalf of

the worker, but both the parties were absent and no claim petition was filed in the instant case by the Union

raising the dispute on behalf of the worker. The case was again listed for hearing on 03.04.2018, 01.05.2018,

25.07.18, 28.09.2018, 20.11.2018, 18.01.19, but surprisingly enough to note that despite giving repeated and

reasonable opportunities to the Union for filing claim petition on behalf of the worker, neither any one

appeared on behalf of the union/worker nor any claim petition was filed in the case.

3. Therefore, from the above facts and circumstances of the case, it is absolutely evident that neither the union

raising the present dispute nor the workman is interested in prosecuting the present case. In the instant case

2682

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

union/workers have been given sufficient opportunities to present their claim petition, but after availing of

the adequate opportunities, workers / union have deliberately and willingly failed in discharging their legal

obligation in filing claim petition on their behalf before the Tribunal.

4. Hence, it is abundantly clear that it is a case wherein neither pleadings have been filed by the contesting

parties nor have any documentary evidence been filed on their behalf.

5. As such it is case of no pleading and no evidence; therefore, under these circumstances it is held that the

union /workers are not entitled for any relief for want of pleadings and proof.

6. Reference is answered as above.

dated 08.04.2019

RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 24 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 658-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14 ½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Js;l

xzkeh.k cSad izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k dkuiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 41/2013, 109/2013, 79/2013, 97/2013, 86/2013, 83/2013, 42/2013,

101/2103, 43/2103, 90/2013, 85/2013, 87/2103, 47/2013, 84/2103, 138/2103, 139/2013, 81/2013, 96/2013, 83/2014,

100/2014, 99/2013, 98/2103, 88/2013, 95/2013, 82/2103, 111/2014, 89/2103/2019) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 24-04-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA

[la- ,y&12012/13, 27, 38, 56, 39, 15, 60, 28, 57, 40, 24, 42, 26, 97,

95, 37, 48, 38, 54, 55, 29, 58, 41, 25, 23/2013&vkbZvkj ¼ch&I½]

ch- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 24th April, 2019

S.O. 658.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 41/2013, 109/2013, 79/2013, 97/2013, 86/2013, 83/2013, 42/2013,

101/2013, 43/2013, 90/2013, 85/2013, 87/2013, 47/2013, 84/2013, 138/2013, 139/2013, 81/2013, 96/2013, 83/2014,

100/2014, 99/2013, 98/2013, 88/2013, 95/2013, 82/2013, 111/2014, 89/2013) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court Kanpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Shryas

Gramin Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 24-04-2019.

[No. L-12012/13, 27, 38, 56, 39, 36, 15, 60, 28, 57, 40, 24, 42, 26,

97, 95, 37, 48, 38, 54, 59, 55, 29, 58, 41, 25, 23/2013-IR(B-1)]

B.S. BISHT, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI RAKESH KUMAR, HJS, PRESIDING OFFICER

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOR COURT, KANPUR.

1. Industrial Dispute No. 41 of 2013

Between

Sri Jagdish Singh,

S/o Sri Rajendra Pal Singh,

C/o Sri R. P. Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman,

Shreyas Gramin Bank,

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2683

Head Office Digg iRoad,

Aligarh 202001.

AWARD

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/13/2013-IR(B-1) dated 28.05.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shryas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Jagdish

Singh son of Sri Rajendra Pal Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to

what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”

2. Industrial Dispute No. 109 of 2013

Between

Sri Udaiveer Singh,

S/o Sri Babu Lal,

C/o Sri R. P. Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman,

Shreyas Gramin Bank,

Head Office Diggi Road,

Aligarh 202001.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/27/2013-IR(B-1) dated 28.05.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shryas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Udaiveer

Singh son of Sri Babu Lal workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief

the workman concerned is entitled to?”

3. Industrial Dispute No. 79 of 2013

Between

Sri Darshan Singh,

S/o Sri Chunni Lal,

C/o Sri R. P. Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman,

Shreyas Gramin Bank,

Head Office Diggi Road,

Aligarh 202001.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/38/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Darshan

Singh son of Sri Chunni Lal workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief

the workman concerned is entitled to?”

2684

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4. Industrial Dispute No. 97 of 2013

Between

Sri Sandeep Kumar,

S/o Sri Mohan Lal,

C/o Sri R. P. Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman,

Gramin Bank of Aryavart.

Head Office A-2/46, Vijai Khand,

Gomti Nagar,

Lucknow 226010

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/56/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

”Whether the action of the management of erstwhile Shreyas Gramin Bank, now Gramin Bank of Aryawart

in terminating the services of Sri Sandeep Kumar son of Sri Mohan Lal workman with effect from

01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”

5. Industrial Dispute No. 86 of 2013

Between

Sri Jagveer Singh,

S/o Sri Pokhpal Singh,

C/o Sri R. P. Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman,

Shreyas Gramin Bank,

Head Office Diggi Road,

Aligarh 202001.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/39/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Jagveer

Singh son of Sri Pokhpal workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the

workman concerned is entitled to?”

6. Industrial Dispute No. 83 of 2013

Between

Sri Pankaj Kumar Jain,

S/o Sri Puttu Lal Jain,

C/o Sri R. P. Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2685

And

The Chairman,

Shreyas Gramin Bank,

Head Office Diggi Road,

Aligarh 202001.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/36/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Pankaj

Kumar Jain son of Sri Rajendra Pal Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not

to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”

7. Industrial Dispute No. 42 of 2013

Between

Sri Rakesh Kumar

S/o Sri Roshan Lal,

C/o Sri R. P. Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman,

Shreyas Gramin Bank,

Head Office Diggi Road,

Aligarh 202001.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/15/2013-IR(B-1) dated 28.05.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Rakesh

Kumar son of Sri Roshan Lal workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief

the workman concerned is entitled to?”

8. Industrial Dispute No. 101 of 2013

Between

Sri Arvind Kumar,

S/o Sri Prabhu Dayal Saxena,

C/o Sri R. P. Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman,

Gramin Bank of Aryavart.

Head Office A-2/46, Vijai Khand,

Gomti Nagar,

Lucknow 226010

2686

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/60/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryawart in

terminating the services of Sri Arvind Kumar son of Sri Prabhu Dayal Saxena workman with effect from

01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”

9. Industrial Dispute No. 43 of 2013

Between

Sri Pushpendra Kumar

s/o Sri Ramesh Chandra,

C/o Sri R. P. Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman,

Gramin Bank of Aryavart.

Head Office A-2/46, Vijai Khand,

Gomti Nagar,

Lucknow 226010

the services of Sri Pushpendra Kumar son of Sri Ramesh Chandra workman with

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/28/2013-IR(B-1) dated 17.05.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri

Pushpendra Kumar son of Sri Ramesh Chandra workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal?

If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”

10. Industrial Dispute No. 90 of 2013

Between

Sri Pradeep Kumar Jain,

s/o Sri Prem Chand Jain,

C/o Sri R. P. Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman,

Gramin Bank of Aryavart.

Head Office A-2/46, Vijai Khand,

Gomti Nagar,

Lucknow 226010

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/57/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryawart in

terminating the services of Sri Pradep Kumar Jain son of Sri Prem Chand Jain workman with effect from

01.01.2010 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2687

11. Industrial Dispute No. 85 of 2013

Between

Sri Amar Babu,

s/o Sri Chunni Lal

C/o Sri R. P. Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman,

Shreyas Gramin Bank,

Head Office Diggi Road,

Aligarh 202001.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/40/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

”Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Amar

Babu son of Sri Chunni Lal workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief

the workman concerned is entitled to?”

12 Industrial Dispute No. 87 of 2013

Between

Sri Roop Kishore,

s/o Shri Krishan,

C/o Sri R. P. Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman,

Shreyas Gramin Bank,

Head Office Diggi Road,

Aligarh 202001.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/24/2013-IR(B-1) dated 04.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shryas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Roop

Kishore son of Shri Krishan workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief

the workman concerned is entitled to?”

13. Industrial Dispute No. 84 of 2013

Between

Sri Satish Kumar,

s/oVijay Pal Singh

C/o Sri R. P. Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

2688

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

And

The Chairman,

Shreyas Gramin Bank,

Head Office Diggi Road,

Aligarh 202001.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/42/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shryas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Satish

Kumar son of Sri Vijay Pal Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what

relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”

14. Industrial Dispute No. 47 of 2013

Between

Sri Omveer Singh,

s/o Late Mahendra Singh,

C/o Sri R. P. Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman,

Shreyas Gramin Bank,

Head Office Diggi Road,

Aligarh 202001.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/26/2013-IR(B-1) dated 20.05.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Omveer

Singh son of late Mahendra Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what

relief the workman concerned is entitled to?’’

15. Industrial Dispute No. 138 of 2013

Between

Sri Ram Prakash,

s/o Sri Ram Das,

C/o Sri R. P. Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman,

Shreyas Gramin Bank,

Head Office Diggi Road,

Aligarh 202001.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/97/2013-IR(B-1) dated 08.11.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2689

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shryas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in

terminating the services of Sri Ram Prakash son of Sri Ram Das workman with effect from 01.01.2013 is just

fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”

16. Industrial Dispute No. 139 of 2013

Between

Sri Raghvender Singh,

s/o Sri Jai Pal Singh,

C/o Sri R P Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman,

Gramin Bank of Aryavart,

Head Office

A-2/46 Vijay Khand,

Gomti Nagar,

Lucknow.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/95/2013-IR(B-1) dated 08.11.2013 has

referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

”Whether the action of the management of erstwhile Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in

terminating the services of Sri Raghvendra Singh son of Sri Jai Pal Singh workman with effect from 01.01.2013 is

just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”

17. Industrial Dispute No. 81 of 2013

Between

Sri Manoj Kumar,

s/o Sri Murari Lal,

C/o Sri R P Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman,

Shreyas Gramin Bank,

Head Office Diggi Road,

Aligarh 202001.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification no. L-12012/37/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

”Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Manoj

Kumar son of Sri Murari Lal workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief

the workman concerned is entitled to?”

2690

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

18. Industrial Dispute No. 96 of 2013

Between

Sri Moharman Singh,

s/o Sri Netra Pal Singh C/o Sri R P Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman,

Gramin Bank of Aryavart,

Head Office

A-2/46 Vijay Khand,

Gomti Nagar,

Lucknow.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification no. L-12012/48/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

”Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri

Moharman Singh son of Sri Netrapal Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If

not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”

19. Industrial Dispute No. 83 of 2014

Between

Sri Kuldeep Singh,

s/o Sri Umesh Singh C/o Sri R P Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman,

Gramin Bank of Aryavart,

Head Office

A-2/46 Vijay Khand,

Gomti Nagar,

Lucknow.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification no. L-12012/38/2014-IR(B-1) dated 03.07.2014.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

”Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in

terminating the services of Sri Kuldeep Singh son of Sri Umesh Singh workman with effect from 01.07.2012

is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”

20. Industrial Dispute No. 100 of 2014

Between

Sri Tarsem Kumar,

s/o Sri Balak Ram,

C/o Sri R P Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2691

And

The Chairman,

Gramin Bank of Aryavart,

Head Office

A-2/46 Vijay Khand,

Gomti Nagar,

Lucknow.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/54/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in

terminating the services of Sri Rarsem son of Sri Balak Ram workman with effect from 01.01.2012 is just

fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”

21. Industrial Dispute No. 99 of 2013

Between

Sri Dinesh Kumar

s/o Sri Pramod Kumar, C/o Sri R. P. Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman,

Gramin Bank of Aryavart,

Head Office

A-2/46 Vijay Khand,

Gomti Nagar,

Lucknow.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/59/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in

terminating the services of Sri Dinesh Kumar son of Sri Pramod Kumar workman with effect from

01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”

22. Industrial Dispute No. 98 of 2013

Between

Sri Deepak Kumar,

s/o Sri Brahman Singh, C/o Sri R. P. Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman,

Gramin Bank of Aryavart,

Head Office

A-2/46 Vijay Khand,

Gomti Nagar,

Lucknow.

2692

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/55/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

”Whether the action of the management of erstwhile Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart

in terminating the services of Sri Kuldeep Singh son of Sri Umesh Singh workman with effect from

01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”

23. Industrial Dispute No. 88 of 2013

Between

Sri Manoj Kumar,

s/o Sri Jaidev Singh, C/o Sri R. P. Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman,

Shreyas Gramin Bank,

Head Office,

Diggi Road,

Aligarh.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/29/2013-IR(B-1) dated 04.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in

terminating the services of Sri Manoj Kumar son of Sri Jaidev Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is

just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”

24. Industrial Dispute No. 95 of 2013

Between

Sri Narendra Pal Singh,

s/o Sri Vijay Pal Singh C/o Sri R. P. Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman,

Gramin Bank of Aryavart,

Head Office

A-2/46 Vijay Khand,

Gomti Nagar,

Lucknow.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/58/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in

terminating the services of Sri Narendra Pal Singh son of Sri Vijay Pal Singh workman with effect from

01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2693

25. Industrial Dispute No. 82 of 2013

Between

Sri Hariom Tatsath,

S/o Sri Mahaver Singh, C/o Sri R. P. Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman,

Shreyas Gramin Bank,

Head Office

Diggi Road,

Aligarh.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/41/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Hariom

Tatsath son of Sri Mahaveer Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what

relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”

26. Industrial Dispute No. 111 of 2014

Between

Sri Ram Naresh,

S/o Sri Ram Charan, C/o Sri R. P. Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman,

Shreyas Gramin Bank,

Head Office,

Diggi Road,

Aligarh.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/25/2013-IR(B-1) dated 31.05.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Ram

Naresh son of Sri Ram Charan workman with effect from 01.07.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what

relief the workman concerned is entitled to?

27. Industrial Dispute No. 89 of 2013

Between

Sri Virendra Kumar Jain, S/o

Sh. Raj Kumar Jain C/o Sri R. P. Singh,

State Executive Committee Member,

U.P. Bank Workers Organization,

3/13 Mathura Nagar,

Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

2694

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

And

The Chairman,

Gramin Bank of Aryavart,

Head Office

A-2/46 Vijay Khand,

Gomti Nagar,

Lucknow.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/23/2013-IR(B-1) dated 04.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Virendra

Kumar Jain son of Sri Raj Kumar Jain workman with effect from 01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to

what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”

28. As in all the above cases common question of facts and law is involved, therefore, all the cases were

consolidated by order of the tribunal passed on 05.05.15 and Industrial Dispute No. 41 of 13 was made the

leading case. Therefore the tribunal proposes to decide all the above cases by means of this common award.

29. The case number, name of worker, date of appointment, date of termination of service and the branch where

they were posted are shown in the following chart which is as per facts mentioned by the concerned

workmen in their claim petition:-

SL.

No.

ID No.

Name of worker

Date

of

appointment

Date

of

termination

Branch where was posted

1

41/2013

JAGDISH SINGH

01-06-2007

01-08-2012

SAKRAULI, DIST-ETAH

2

86/2013

JAGVEER SINGH

OCT 1999

01-08-2012

ALIGANJ, DISTT- ETAH

3

97/2013

SANDEEP KUMAR

01/01/2099

01/01/2013

PATIALI GATE,DISTT-ETAH

4

79/2013

DARSHAN SINGH

JUNE 2005

01-08-2012

JINHORA,

UNDER

ETAH

GRAMNIN BANK

5

109/2013

UDAY

VEER

SINGH

1999

01-08-2012

ETAH

CITY

UNDER

ETAH

GRAMNIN BRANCH

6.

83/2013

PANKAJ KR. JAIN

1998

01-08-2012

ISSUALI

UNDER

ETAH

GRAMIN BANK

7.

42/2013

RAKESH KUMAR

2001

1-8-2012

PIWARI

UNDER

ETAH

GRAMIN BANK

8.

101/2013

ARVIND KUMAR

2001

01-01-2013

JAITHRA

UNDER

ETAH

GRAMIN BANK

9

43/2013

PUSHPENDRA

KUMAR

2006

01-08-2012

PUNHERA

,

ETAH

UNDER

SHREYAS GRAMIN BANK

10

99/2013

DINESH KUMAR

2006

01-01-2013

AMRAULI

RATANPUR(ETAH)

UNDER GRAMIN BANK OF

ARYAVART

11.

83/2014

KULDEEP SINGH

JANUARY 2008

01-07-2012

HATHODA (KASGANJ) UNDER

SHREYAS GRAMIN BANK

12.

89/2013

VIRENDRA

KR.

JAIN

26-03-2010

01-01-2013

JALESER

CITIY

UNDER

SHREYAS GRAMIN BANK

13.

111/2013

RAM NARESH

10-08-1999

01-07-2012

VIRAMPUR,

UNDER

ETAH

GRAMIN BANK

14.

82/2013

HARI OM TAD SAT

1995

01-08-2012

JALESHAR

MAIN

BRANCH

UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK,

ATTAH

15.

95/2013

NARENDRA

PAL

SINGH

1990

01-07-2012

SARAWAL

UNDER

ATTAH

GRAMIN BANK

16.

88/2013

MANOJ KUMAR

1997

01-08-2012

ETAH GRAMIN BANK, ATTAH

17.

98/2013

DEEPAK KUMAR

24-04-2K

1-01-2013

DARIYA

GANJ,

DIST-

KASHGANJ

UNDER

ETAH

GRAMIN BANK

18.

100/2013

TARSEM KUMAR

01-01-1992

01-01-2013

RAJA KA RAM PUR (ETAH

GRAMIN BANK)

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2695

19.

96/2013

MOHAR

MAN

SINGH

NIL

01-08-2012

MALAWAN

UNDER

ETAH

GRAMIN BANK

20.

81/2013

MANOJ KUMAR

1997

01-08-2012

JALESHAR CITY UNDER ETAH

GRAMIN BANK

21

139/2013

RAGHVENDRA

SINGH

JANUARY 2010

01-01-2013

PATIALI

BRANCH

UNDER

SHREYAS GRAMIN BANK

22

138/2013

RAMPRAKASH

APRIL 1986

1-1-2013

SIKAHRA

UNDER

ETAH

GRAMIN BANK

23.

47/2013

OM VEER SINGH

1-4-2001

1-8-2012

NIDHAULI KALAWN UNDER

ETAH GRAMIN BANK

24.

84/2013

SATISH KUMAR

1-1-1993

1-8-2012

AWAGARH,

ETAH

UNDER

ETAH GRAMIN BANK

25.

87/2013

ROOP KISHORE

JULY 2003

01-08-2012

NAGARIA

BRANCH

UNDER

ETAH GRAMIN BANK

26.

85/2013

AMAR BABU

JANUARY 2008

1-8-2012

JIRSAMI(ETAH)

UNDER

SHREYAS GRAMIN BANK

27.

90/2013

PRADEEP KR. JAIN

1992

1-1-2010

SAKRAULI

(ETAH)

UNDER

ETAH GRAMIN BANK

30. In the claim petition filed by each workman it is alleged that on 01.04.2014 Shreyas Gramin Bank and

Aryavart Regional Gamin Bank were amalgamated with each other and Gramin Bank of Aryavart was

constituted of which Head Office is situated at A-2/46, Vijay Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow. It is also

alleged that prior to 01.04.13, in the month of June 2006, Aligarh Gramin Bank, Etah Gramin Bank and

Jamuna Gramin Bank were amalgamated with each other and in its place Shreyas Gramin Bank was

constituted.

31. It is further alleged that the then branch managers of the branches mentioned above, to run effectively the

working of the branch and with permission of senior officers of the bank had appointed the workers as

temporary daily rated employee / messenger (coolie), but no appointment letters were issued to the concerned

workmen by the management. The entire workers under the instructions of the branch managers had worked

for whole month and their work and conduct ever remained satisfactory. It is further alleged by all the

workmen that despite performing work for whole month, they had been paid wages only for 10 days and all

the workmen were being assured by the then branch managers of the respective branches that in case they

continue to work in the branch, their services will be regularized at the post of permanent messenger.

Workers have further stated that believing the assurances given by the employer they continued to work in

the respective branches of the bank. It is further pleaded that all the workers were also used to be paid bonus

according to Rules. One fine morning suddenly by oral order of the then branch managers of respective

branches, the services of all the workers were terminated (as per date mentioned in the chart as above) in

gross violation of the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, by adopting Unfair Labor Practice as also

ignoring their length of service. It is further pleaded by all the workers that from the facts and circumstances

herein above it is established that they were removed from the services of the bank on an arbitrary and

whimsical considerations without following the legal provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

32. Lastly it is prayed by each worker that they be reinstated in the service of the bank at the post of messenger

with full back wages and further all of them be regularized in the service of bank.

33. It is pertinent to mention here that all the workers have also filed a copy of Public Notice dated 01.04.2013,

issued by the Head office of Aryavart Gramin Bank, Luckow, which, inter-alia, provide amalgamation of

Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) sponsored by Bank of India and Canara Bank into a single larger RRB in the

State of Uttar Pradesh. It further provides that by Notification No. F.No.719/2011-RRB(UP-1) dated

01.04.2013, Government of India, in the exercise of powers under sub section (1) of section 23(A) of the

Regional Rural Banks Act 1976 (21) in consultation with National Bank for Agriculture and Rural

Development (NABARD) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Bank of India and Canara Bank being the sponsor’s

bank of 1) Aryavart Kshertiya Garmin Bank and 2) Shreyas Gramin Bank, referred to as Regional Rural

Banks (RRBs) has in public interest and in the interest of development of the area served by the aforesaid

Regional Bank and also in the interest of development of the area served by the aforesaid Regional Rural

Banks and also in the interest of the said Regional Rural Banks themselves notified amalgamation of the two

Regional Rural Banks into a single Regional Rural Bank with effect from the date of publication of the said

Notification in the official Gazette of Government of India.

34. It has further been stated by the Opposite Party that therefore, from the above notification which is a public

document, it is established that the Shreyas Gramin Bank stands eliminated and after amalgamation, in its

2696

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

place Gramin Bank of Aryavart has been legally placed and all the workers would be deemed to have been

appointed by the Gramin Bank of Aryavat, Lucknow at their respective branches.

35. Management has filed a common reply in each case wherein it is admitted by the management that Shreyas

Gramin Bank had been amalgamated with Gramin Bank of Aryavart by notification ref.No. F.No. 7/9/2011

RRB (U.P.1) dated 01.04.2013.

36. Management has further alleged that appointment and promotions in the respondent bank are made as per

Government of India guidelines and prevailing rules in the Bank are also framed by Government of India in

exercise of powers conferred by section 29 read with section 17 of the RRB Act, 1976 and known as (RRB

Appointment and Promotion Rules, 1998).

37. It is further alleged that none of the applicants were ever appointed to any substantive post in the bank by

following the procedure laid down by the Government of India. All the workers were engaged as Coolie in

the Branches of the Bank and Coolie is a person who is engaged by the branch Manager on the emergent

need of work and on day to day basis in case of need of the branch. That none of the workers have worked

for whole month and the coolie charges have been paid to the petitioners on day to day basis, who were

engaged on emergent basis. Coolie Charges have been paid to the workers by charging the amount from

Contingency Charges by the respective branch managers on the basis of actual number of working days. It is

also denied by the bank that it had ever paid any salary or wages to the workers and that the “Coolie

Charges” does not come within the definition of wages.

38. It is also denied by the management that there ever existed the relationship of master and servant between the

Gramin Bank of Aryavat and the workman and that they had never been on the rolls of the bank as they were

not in the service of the bank. It is also pleaded that none of the worker had ever marked his attendance in the

attendance register. None of the worker had ever held any regular and permanent post in the bank. Bank had

never issued any appointment letter to any of the workman involved in the present case. It is also denied by

the management that any of the workman had worked for 240 days of continuous service during the period of

12 calendar months preceding the date of their respective termination of services. All the workmen were

engaged on day to day basis and that such engagement came to an end at the end of the day. The management

had never terminated the services of the workmen as mentioned in the present reference order, therefore, the

present reference on this ground alone, is without jurisdiction, bad in law and not maintainable under the

provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The service conditions of the bank employee do not apply to any

of the workmen. Recruitment in the bank is done as per the set guidelines of the Government and accordingly

candidates are sponsored by the Regional Employment Exchange, thereafter, they are subjected to written

test and interview and only those candidates are appointed by offering them appointment letter in the service

of the bank who have been declared successful. It is also pleaded that all the workmen are trying to enter into

the service of the bank through back door entry by misusing and abusing the powers of this Tribunal. The

persons engaged in emergent need on casual or daily rate basis are not covered by the “Bank Awards and

Settlements”. It is denied by the management that at any point of time it had contravened any of the

provisions of the Act. The selection and appointment against regular and permanent post is the prerogative of

the competent authority of the bank and a person who had never been recruited on regular basis had no right

to assail the action of the appointing authority. The bank had never retrenched or terminated the services of

the workmen at any point of time by oral or written orders, hence no industrial dispute exists between the

contesting parties. It is also pleaded that none of the worker is covered by the definition of Workman as

defined u/s 2(s) of the Act as also the management is not an Employer as defined under section 2(g) of the

Act. That the workmen of the instant case prior to raising of the present dispute had also approached the

Hon’ble High Court Allahabad with same prayer as has been prayed in their respective claim petitions but

their writ petition was dismissed by order dated 01.03.2012, hence the decision of the Hon’ble Court is

binding in the present case also.

39. On merit of the case It is admitted by the bank that the petitioners were engaged for the work of coolie in the

branch of the Bank and Coolie is a person who is engaged by the Branch Manager on the emergent

requirement and on day to day basis in case of any need at the branch. None of the worker was ever

appointed as Daily Rated Messenger (Coolie) in the branch. Since there was no regular vacancy in the

branch, therefore, the question of appointment on the post of Daily Rated Messenger (Coolie) in the bank

does not arise at all. None of the worker had produced formal letter of their appointment in the bank and all

of them are perhaps trying to seek back door entry in the service of the bank. It is also denied by the bank

that at any point of time the bank had adopted any unfair labor practice with regard to the workmen.

40. The management on the basis of above pleadings has prayed that the present claim of the respective workers

is devoid of merit and is therefore, liable to be rejected in lim-ne. It is also prayed that none of the workman

is entitled for the relief claimed by them.

41. Rejoinder statements have also been filed by each of the workmen but therein nothing new has been pleaded

except reiterating of the facts already pleaded in their respective claim petitions.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2697

42. It is relevant to mention here that by order dated 17.02.16, industrial dispute case nos 138, 139 of 13 and

83/14 were further consolidated with Industrial Dispute No. 41 of 13 which was made the leading case.

43. The management by application dated 02.11.2015 which is paper no. 14/1 has filed photocopy of order dated

20.09.2011 passed in Writ A No.-53798 of 2011 and order dated 01.03.2013 passed in Writ A No. 11728 of

2012 passed by Hon’ble High Court, Allahabad.

44. It is pertinent to mention here that by order dated 27.05.15, this tribunal partly allowed the application for

summoning of documents from the management and the management was directed to produce Vouchers,

Attendance Register, Salary Register, Dispatch Register (Tappal) as these documents are relevant for

deciding the case.

45. In the instant case on behalf of the workmen S/Sri Udaiveer Singh in I.D. No.109 of 2013, has examined

himself as w.w.1, Virendra Kumar Jain in I. D. Case No. 89 of 2013, has examined himself as w.w. 2, Ram

Naresh in I.D. No. 111 of 2013, has examined himself as w.w.3, Pushpendra Kumar in I. D. No. 43 of 2013,

has examined himself as w.w.4 and Sri Hariom Tatsat in I.D. No. 82 of 2013 has examined himself as w.w.5,

and all of them have filed their evidence on affidavit. They have also filed certain photocopies of the

documents like payment vouchers and dispatch registers which have been duly verified by the bank.

46. In his affidavit evidence W.W.1 Sri Udaiveer Singh has stated nothing new except reiterating the statement

made by him in his claim petition. He has filed photocopies of payment vouchers dated 01.08.11, 01.09.11,

01.10.11, 31.10.11, 01.12.11, 18.01.12, 02.02.12, 02.03.12, 31.03.12, 04.05.12, 02.06.12, 07.07.12 and

13.09.12 in support of his claim and all these payment vouchers are marked as paper no. 15/4 to15/17. All

these documents are duly verified by the bank. Beside the witness has also filed photocopies of dispatch

register paper no. 15/19 to 15/68.

47. This witness in his cross examination has categorically admitted that he was engaged by the branch manager

on need basis as Coolie. He admitted that he was used to be paid his wages by the bank from contingency

through voucher. Witness has further admitted the fact that he was never issued any appointment letter from

the bank and he also expressed his ignorance as to whether or not such letter is available on the record of the

case. He has submitted that his attendance was marked and the record showing that he had rendered 240 days

of continuous service is available on the file. He further asserted that he was removed from the service in the

month of June 2012, but he does not remember the exact date on which his services were dispensed with by

the bank.

48. In his affidavit evidence workman W.W.2, Virendra Kumar Jain has deposed that on 26.03.2010, the then

Shreyas Gramin Bank ( now known as Gramin Bank of Aryavart) had opened its new Branch at Firozabad

and at that time no person was appointed on the post of Messenger on permanent basis. The then Branch

Manager after approval of his senior officers had appointed him on the post of Messenger (Coolie). He

performed the duties of messenger with full devotion. Worker has further given details of payment of

monthly salary during the period March 2010 to June 2012, and last payment of salary was at Rs.4275/- in

the month of June 2012. He has further deposed that the bank used to utilize his services outside the branch

and that with effect from 30.06.2012 suddenly he was removed from the service of the bank in an arbitrary

manner without making compliance of the mandatory provisions of the Act. He has further deposed that he is

unemployed.

49. The witness W.W.2 in support of the above assertions has filed photocopy of payment vouchers duly verified

by the Senior Manager, City Branch, Firozabad, Gramin Bank of Aryavart and these payment vouchers are

dated 01.09.11, paper no. 14/6, 29.09.11, paper no. 14/7, 01.11.2011, paper no. 14/8, 01.12.11, paper no.

14/9, 31.12.11, paper no. 14/10, 01.02.12, paper no. 14/11, 29.02.12, paper no.14/12, 31.03.12, paper no,

14/13, 01.05.12, paper no. 14/14 and 01.06.2012, paper no. 14/15 and 30.06.12, paper no.14/16. Apart from

above, the worker has also filed certain photocopies of letters of the branch manager addressed to Regional

Office of the Bank at Agra purported to have been sent through the workman over which the branch manager

had verified his signatures. These documents are paper no. 14/17 to 14/20. He has further filed photocopies

of dispatch register duly verified by the bank which are paper no. 14/21 to 14/69.

50. In his cross examination the worker has admitted that he was engaged as Coolie by the branch manager on

need basis. He was not paid his wages on daily wages rather wages were paid to him on monthly basis

through vouchers. Sometimes bank used to pay him wages 1800/- per month and sometimes Rs.2600/-. He

admitted the fact that he was not issued any appointment letter by the bank and that he was not used to mark

his attendance in the register in the branch. He further admitted that the signatures appearing on paper no.

14/6 to 14/16 which are payment vouchers are not his signatures. It is correct that there is no document on the

record to show that he had rendered continuous service of 240 days but he was paid through vouchers and

lastly he has submitted that the bank dispensed with his services on 12.06.2012.

51. Workman Ram Naresh in I.D. Case No. 111/2013 has examined himself as W.W.3 and has filed his evidence

on affidavit in which he has deposed that on 10.8.99 he was engaged as Part Time Sweeper by the then

Branch Manager, Etah Gramin Bank ( now known as Gramin Bank of Aryavart). He has further deposed that

the bank had paid him wages and bonus as per rules. By an oral order he was transferred to Muhiuddin

2698

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Branch of the Bank as the regular part time sweeper posted at that branch was transferred to Regional Office,

Etah. Witness has further stated that he was working continuously from 12.08.11. Witness has further given

details of payment of wages for the period September 2011 to June 2012. Apart from above statement, the

witness has reiterated the allegations made by him in his petition.

52. W.W.3 in his cross examination has admitted the fact that the bank had engaged him on the post of Coolie on

need basis. He was being paid his wages directly through the branch manager and that monthly wages were

paid to him through voucher. He has further admitted that he was not issued any appointment letter by the

bank. The voucher that are filed along with his petition do not bear his signatures. Witness has stated that his

attendance was marked in the branch but he has not filed any record showing that he had worked

continuously for 240 days. Lastly the witness has stated that he was removed from the service of the bank in

the month of June 2012, but he does not remember the actual date of his termination from the service.

53. This witness along with his affidavit evidence has also filed photocopies of dispatch register duly verified by

the bank, but the witness has not whispered even a single word that the writing appearing on the register is of

his own hand writing and that these documents also do not disclose the fact that actually it was in his name or

documents bear the name of the witness. The documents filed by the witness are paper no.13/16 to 13/22.

54. Lastly worker Pushpendra Kumar has examined himself as W.W.5 and has filed his affidavit in his evidence.

He has also filed photocopies of payment vouchers which are paper no. 12/5 to 12/13 and photocopies of

dispatch register paper no. 12/14 to 12/31. All these documents have been duly verified by the bank.

55. W.W.5 in his evidence has reiterated the same facts which have been pleaded by him in his claim petition

therefore, there is no need to detail those facts again.

56. In his cross examination the above witness has admitted that it is correct that he was engaged as Coolie by

the branch manager. Witness has further admitted that his wages was directly transferred in his account by

the bank and this fact has not been mentioned by him in his affidavit. He was not given any appointment

letter by the bank. The vouchers that are filed along with his affidavit do not bear his signatures. His

attendance was not recorded by the bank and he has not filed any record showing that he had worked for 240

days continuously in the preceding year. Witness has further deposed that he was removed from the service

of the bank in the month of June 12 without making any payment. Witness again stated that he was paid

bonus by the bank after June 2012 but exact amount of bonus is not known to him. Witness has lastly stated

that no record has been filed by him relating to the bonus paid to him by the bank.

57. On the contrary, the bank has examined Shri Rakesh Kumar as M.W.1, who has filed his affidavit in

evidence. This witness has stated that presently he is posted as Manager Gramin Bank of Aryavart, Branch

Punhera, District Etah. M.W.1 in his evidence has further stated that Gramin Bank of Aryavart is a Regional

Rural Bank established under the provision of Section 3 of Regional Rural Bank Act, 1976, and as per the

provision of the Act, Regional Rural Bank shall in discharge of its function be guided by such direction in

regard to matter of Policy as the Central Government may give or make in this behalf. This witness goes on

to state that appointments and promotions in the bank are made as per Government of India guidelines and

prevailing Rules in the Bank are also framed by Government of India in exercise of powers conferred by

section 29 read with section 17 of the Regional Rural Bank Act, 1976 and now known as (RRB

APPOINTMENT 7 PROMOTION RULES 1998). Witness further states that the applicant Jagdish Singh and

other applicants were never appointed to any substantive post in the bank by following the procedures laid

down by Central Government under the said Appointment & Promotions Rules, 1998. Applicant Jagdish

Singh and other applicants were engaged as Coolie in the branch of the Bank; Coolie is a person who is

engaged by the Branch Manager on the emergent need of work and on Day to Day basis. It is further stated

by the witness that none of the workers involved in the case had ever worked as a Coolie for whole month in

the branch and Coolie charge have been paid to the workers on Day-to Day basis who were engaged on the

emergent requirement of the Branch. Coolie charges have been paid to the workers by drawing the amounts

from Contingency Charges and that bank had never paid any wages to the concerned workmen. There exists

no relationship of Master and Servant between the bank and the concerned workmen. Concerned workmen

had never been on the rolls of the bank as they were not in the service of the bank and that none of the

concerned workmen had ever marked their attendance in the bank and that none of the worker had ever held

any Regular and Permanent post in the bank. Bank had never issued any appointment letter to the concerned

workmen in any cadre whatsoever. It is also denied that any of the concerned workman had continuously

worked for 240 days during the period of 12 calendar months preceding the date of their alleged respective

termination. Bank had never terminated the services of the concerned workmen. Service Conditions

applicable on the regular and permanent employees of the bank are not applicable on the concerned

workmen; hence they are not entitled to get any benefits or facilities like regular and permanent employees of

the Bank. Name of none of the concerned workmen had ever been sponsored through the Employment

Exchange or had any one of them ever been subjected to any written test or interview by the bank. Lastly it is

stated by the witness in his affidavit that there is no regular and permanent vacancy in the bank against which

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2699

the concerned claimants are claiming their reinstatement or permanent regularization in the bank, therefore,

none of the claimants have any lien or right on any regular and permanent post.

58. In his cross examination M.W.1 has stated that in the year 1983 he was appointed as an officer in the head

office of Etah Gramin Bank, Etah. Witness has denied the suggestion as to whether it is correct that Officers

and Employees are appointed under Appointment & Promotion Rules 1998. Witness has stated that Coolie is

appointed as per need basis. After going through the document paper no.15/5, the witness has stated that it is

a payment voucher with regard to whosoever is appointed as Coolie and bears the signature of the officer of

the branch i.e. Branch Manager and payment has been mentioned for 26 days. Except holidays, the branch

continues to work for whole month. Similarly the witness after going through paper no.15/17 has stated that

the payment had been made to Coolie but it does not contain the name of the Coolie. Witness has further

admitted that he had appointed a person by name Devendra Jain as Coolie and that he does not remember as

to whether amongst 28 concerned workmen any of them had been appointed or not. Witness has expressed

his complete ignorance about the 28 concerned workmen and whatever has been deposed by him in his

affidavit is correct, but complete whereabouts about the 28 concerned workmen is not known to him. Witness

has further shown his ignorance about the fact that Jagdish or other concerned workers have worked for 240

days or not. Whatever payment vouchers have been filed on the record of the court file is correct. The

witness has denied the suggestion that concerned workers who are alleged to have been removed from the

service of the bank on 30.06.12 have been given any notice or retrenchment compensation. It is not in his

knowledge as to whether concerned workmen were given bonus or not in the year 2013. It is not in his

knowledge that in the year 2013 workman Jagdish was paid bonus or not likewise he has no knowledge that

in City Branch of Firozabad except Coolie there was any regular messenger.

59. I have heard the arguments of both the learned representatives for the parties at length and have given my

anxious considerations to the documents and evidence led by the parties.

60. The learned representative for the workmen has mainly argued that the concerned workers were appointed as

messenger in the bank by the respective Branch Managers as Messenger/Coolie after seeking the approval of

the senior officers of the Bank for doing the regular and permanent work of the bank. The concerned

workmen were used to be paid their wages month wise and all the concerned workers have continued to serve

the bank on the assurances given by the officers of the bank that their services will be regularized as

Messenger in the Branch, but suddenly under the oral order of the Branch Manager their services were

dispensed with from the date mentioned in the reference order without following the provisions of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in utter violation of the principle of natural justice. It is also argued that the

bank had neither given any notice nor retrenchment compensation to the concerned workmen at the time of

dispensation of their services, therefore, they are entitled to be reinstated in the service of the bank at the post

of messenger with full back wages and continuity of service.

61. On the contrary the representative for the management has advanced his arguments submitting that none of

the concerned worker had ever been appointed by the bank in any capacity whatsoever; none of the

concerned worker had ever been paid wages by the bank; no appointment letter has been issued to any of the

worker; concerned workers have never been in the regular and permanent employment of the bank; there

existed no relationship of Employer and Employee between the Bank and the concerned workers; none of the

worker had ever completed 240 days of continuous service in the bank preceding 12 calendar year from the

date of their respective termination of the service; the concerned workers have no lien or right against any

regular and permanent post as none of them had ever been subjected to selection process prescribed under

Rules of the Bank, hence in the eye of law the relief claimed by the concerned workers is not liable to be

allowed and the entire claim of the concerned workers are liable to be rejected.

62. Considering the rival contention of the contesting parties it has become essential that the Tribunal should first

examine the fact as to whether the concerned workers have completed 240 days of continuous service

preceding 12 calendar months from the date of their alleged termination as mentioned in the respective

reference order.

63. Weighing the oral as well as documentary evidence adduced by the concerned worker it is abundantly clear

that the concerned workers with one voice have asserted in their oral evidence that they have completed 240

days of continuous service in a year and in support thereof have also filed photocopies of the payment

vouchers which are duly verified by the bank. By a careful examination of these payment vouchers, it is quite

evident that in the payment vouchers the name of the workers have not been mentioned and even each

witness from the side of worker has admitted that these payment vouchers do not bear their signatures.

Therefore, if it is so, how the statement of the witnesses appeared from the side of the concerned workmen

could be believed. Even photocopies of dispatch register filed by the witnesses in support of their claim do

not make it clear that by whom the entries therein have been made and thus these documents are of no help to

the concerned workers and it is not established that the concerned workers have completed 240 days of

continuous service in 12 calendar months preceding the date of their respective termination of service.

2700

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

64. Management witness has categorically asserted in his evidence that no appointment letter was issued to the

concerned workers, none of the concerned worker had ever worked continuously for 240 days, none of the

worker had either been issued any appointment letter or had been paid regular wages from the bank.

Therefore from the evidence of the management witness it stands proved that none of the concerned worker

was ever remained in the employment of the bank or the bank had ever paid regular wages or salary to the

concerned workers.

65. It is also proved from the oral as well as documentary evidence available on the record of the case that there

never existed relationship of Employer and Employee between the Bank and the concerned workers and it is

also established from the evidence of the parties that none of the worker had worked continuously for 240

days preceding 12 calendar months from the date of their respective termination.

66. Needless to mention that it would be futile exercise to examine as to whether any notice or retrenchment

compensation was paid to the concerned workers at the time of dispensation of their services as none of the

concerned worker have specifically pleaded in their claim petition that they worked continuously for 240

days, neither it has been proved.

67. Having concluded that none of the worker had worked continuously for 240 days in the bank, they are not

entitled for any relief as claimed by them in their respective claim petition.

68. Representative for the worker has placed reliance on the following Rulings:-

a)

AIR 1982 SC 854 in the case of L.Robert D’ souza vs Executive Engineer.

b)

1989 LAB IC 623 (PATNA HIGH COURT) IN THE CASE OF STATE BANK OF INDIA VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS.

c)

AIR 2011 SUPREME COURT 2532 IN THE CASE OF DEVINDER SINGH VS MUNICIPAL

COUNCIL SANAUR.

69. The rulings relied by the representative for the worker are distinguishable on facts and law both and they are

not helpful to the concerned workers particularly when it has been held that they have not been able to prove

that they remained in continuous employment of the bank for 240 days preceding 12 calendar months.

70. The representative for the management has also relied upon the following case laws –

1. FLR 2007 (112) 345 in the case of State of M.P. and others vs Lalit Kumar Verma.

2. FLR 2007 (112) Indian Drugs & Pharma Ltd. Vs Workman IDPL S.C.

3. 2006 (110) FLR 803 Manager (Now Regional Director) RBI & Gopi Nath Sharma and others.

4. 2006 (109) FLR 237, Allahabad High Court in the case of Sarjan Kumar vs Central Bank of India and

others.

71. The above case laws have been considered by me. and I am of the opinion that the preposition of law laid

down in the above cited cases fully applies to the facts and circumstances of the case in hand and on the basis

of the same it is once again held that none of the concerned worker are entitled for any relief. After having

heard the arguments of both the parties at length, on scanning of the record and evidence available before the

tribunal, it is inferred that none of the concerned workmen is entitled to any relief.

72. In view of above discussions, the award is adjudicated accordingly.

RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

Date: 10.04.2019

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 659-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ

Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- ,y lh

6@2011½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&22013@01@2019&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]

jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2701

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 659.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. LC 6/2011) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni Collieries

Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.

[No. L-22013/01/2019-IR(CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present: Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 27th day of February, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.No. 6/2011

Between:

Sri Kola Rajesham,

S/o Rajaposham,

C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,

Advocate, Flat No.G7,

Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,

Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls,

Kachiguda, Hyderabad .

...Petitioner

AND

1. The Chief General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Ramagundam Area-I,

Karimnagar District.

3. The Superintendent of Mines,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

GDK No.2A incline, Ramagundam Area-I,

Karimnagar District.

…Respondents

Appearances:

For the Petitioner :

M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates

For the Respondent :

Sri S.M. Subhani, Advocate

AWARD

Sri Kola Rajesham who worked as Badli Filler (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed this

petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents M/s. Singareni Collieries

Company Ltd., seeking for declaring the proceeding No. RG.1/PER/S/46/3494 dated 10.6.2008 issued by Respondent

No.1 as illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner

into service duly granting all the consequential benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other

attendant benefits etc., and such other reliefs as this court may deems fit.

2.

The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:

The Petitioner was appointed as Badli Filler w.e.f. 18.2.1997and later he was converted as coal filler in the year 2005.

But during the year 2006 the Petitioner suffered with ill-health and faced other family problems like, suffering of his

father with heart stroke and his elder brother met with an accident, as a result of which, he could not be regular to his

duties. While the matters stood thus, one charge sheet dated 26.3.2007 was issued to the Petitioner by the Respondents

alleging that the Petitioner absented for duty during the year 2006 which amounts to misconduct under company’s

Standing Order No.25.25. Subsequently, one inquiry was conducted and during the time of the enquiry, the Petitioner

was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on such lopsided enquiry,

the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer, the

Petitioner was dismissed from service vide order dated 10.6.2008. It is stated that during the course of the enquiry the

Petitioner has categorically stated about his inability to perform his duties regularly during the above said period as it

was only on account of his ill-health and some family problems. But without considering any of his submissions, the

2702

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Petitioner was dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents’ management in dismissing

the Petitioner from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has

rendered about 11 years of continuous service in the Respondents’ management. The Petitioner approached the

Respondents to consider his case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the

Petitioner was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order No. RG.1/PER/S/46/3494 dated

10.6.2008 issued by Respondent No.1 is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the

Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all other attendant benefits such as continuity of

service, back wages etc..

3.

The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief

which runs as follows:

In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner was

appointed in the Respondents’ company on 21.2.1997 as Badli Filler and later he was appointed as Coal Filler with

effect from 1.8.2006. He was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism, after conducting a detailed

domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has attended the dates fixed for the

enquiry and had fully participated in the enquiry. He was given full, fair and reasonable opportunity to defend

himself in the enquiry. The enquiry was conducted purely following the principles of natural justice. It is stated that

basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer, he submitted his report holding the charges levelled

against the Petitioner was proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry proceeding was sent to the Petitioner

by way of show cause notice giving him an opportunity to make representation against the findings of the enquiry

report; since the charge levelled against the Petitioner is proved and it was serious in nature, punishment warranted

was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the enquiry proceeding and his past record

and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view and lastly, the Respondents were

constrained to dismiss the Petitioner from service. It is stated that in fact the Petitioner was irregular to his duties and

he did not improve his attendance even after issuing charge sheet to him, and after receiving the show cause notice. It

is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is justified and legal and as such the claim petition is

liable to be dismissed in limini.

4.

The domestic enquiry conducted in this case by the Respondents is held as legal and valid vide order dated

16.6.2017.

5.

Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in

support of their claim.

6.

In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:

I.

Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the

punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Kola Rajesham is legal and justified?

II.

Whether the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into service?

III.

If not, to what other relief he is entitled?

7.

Point No.I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner

submitted that due to his illness, and heart stroke to his father and accident to his brother and other family problems,

the Petitioner could not be able to attend his duty sincerely. Even in his show cause the Petitioner has mentioned the

above fact, but it has not been considered during the course of the enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital

punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Petitioner. When the Petitioner has taken a stand that due

to his illness, and other family problems he could not be able to attend his duties regularly and remained absent, the

authority should have considered his case while imposing punishment. The authority has not considered any of the

submissions of the Petitioner, and has given capital punishment to the Petitioner when several modes of punishment

are enumerated in the company’s Standing Orders.

8.

On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that when the

Petitioner was a chronic absentee and was found guilty in the charges levelled against him, the punishment imposed

by the Respondents’ company is legal and proper. When the Petitioner was not sincere in his duty and failed to

maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated in service.

9.

Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to his

illness, and other family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to be regular in his duty, the Petitioner has

remained absent in his duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his absenteeism followed by an enquiry.

In the enquiry, the charges levelled against the Petitioner were proved. For this, capital punishment was imposed.

After dismissal of service, the Petitioner has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family

members. He has already realised his mistake and has taken shelter in the court at the age of 41 years, he is now aged

about 48 years and is searching ways and means to provide bread and butter to his family members. When the

Petitioner being an able bodied and energetic man has already realised his mistake and is coming forward to work

under the Respondents, atleast one chance should be given to him for reinstatement into service. Admittedly several

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2703

modes of punishment are enumerated in company’s Standing Orders. Though the Petitioner is not a first offender but

has worked for about 11 years under the Respondents. While imposing capital punishment to his employees, the

management should think of the condition of the workers as well as his family members. In this case, the punishment

imposed by the Respondents for dismissal of service is too harsh. Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action

taken by the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Kola Rajesham is not legal and

justified.

Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.

10.

Point Nos. II & III: In Point No. I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from

service to Sri Kola Rajesham is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the Petitioner

has already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for his reinstatement into service he should

be given a chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Petitioner has become jobless and

he being the sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family members. In such a

circumstances atleast the Petitioner should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and to work under the

Respondents’ management. But in this case, the Petitioner has not come to the court soon after his dismissal of

service. Therefore, in the opinion of this Tribunal the Petitioner is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in his

claim petition. But he is only entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondents’ management.

Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.

ORDER

Proceeding No. RG.1/PER/S/46/3494 dated 10.6.2008 issued by the 1st Respondent is declared as illegal and

is hereby set aside. It is ordered that the workman Sri Kola Rajesham be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e., a

Badli Filler on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the

company Medical Board and the workman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also

directed to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.

The Workman can not claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman

shall have to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the

management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short

fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman will not be terminated and he will

be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall of

attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without any further notice

and enquiry, and in case the workman completes one year of probation period successfully he will continue in service

till the age of his attaining superannuation. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of

Mine accidents/Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company’s hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms and

conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for

appointment afresh.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 27th day of

February, 2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner:

Witnesses examined for the Respondent:

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 660-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ

Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- ,y lh

7@2011½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA

[la- ,y&22013@01@2019&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]

jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

2704

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 660.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. LC 7/2011) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni Collieries

Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.

[No. L-22013/01/2019-IR(CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present: Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 26th day of February, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.No. 7/2011

Between:

Sri Sk. Shareef Pasha,

S/o Hussain Baba,

C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,

Advocate, Flat No.G7,

Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,

Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls,

Kachiguda, Hyderabad .

…Petitioner

AND

1. The Director (P.A. & W),

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Kothagudem. Khammam District.

2. The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri.

Adilabad District.

3. The Colliery Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Kasipet Mine, Mandamarri Area,

Mandamarri. Adilabad District.

… Respondents

Appearances:

For the Petitioner :

M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates

For the Respondent :

Sri S.M. Subhani, Advocate

AWARD

Sri SK. Shareef Pasha who worked as Badli Filler (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed this

petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents M/s. Singareni Collieries

Company Ltd., seeking for declaring the proceeding No. MMR/PER/D/072/10/2982 dated 26.5.2010 issued by the

2nd respondent and the impugned order No.CRP/PER/IR/D/90/2050 dated 15.11.2010 issued by Respondent No.1 as

illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into

service duly granting all the consequential benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other attendant

benefits etc., and such other reliefs as this court may deems fit.

2. The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:

The Petitioner was appointed as Badli Filler w.e.f. 24.3.2007. But during the year 2008 the Petitioner suffered with

ill-health as his left leg was burnt and faced other family problems as a result of which, he could not be regular to his

duties, as the injuries could not be cured for long time. While the matters stood thus, one charge sheet dated

10.1.2009 was issued to the Petitioner by the Respondents alleging that the Petitioner absented for duty during the

year 2008 which amounts to misconduct under company’s Standing Order No.25.25. Subsequently, one inquiry was

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2705

conducted and during the time of the enquiry, the Petitioner was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature

to put forth his grievances. Basing on such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved and

basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer, the Petitioner was dismissed from service vide order dated

26.5.2010 with effect from 16.6.2010. It is stated that during the course of the enquiry the Petitioner has categorically

stated about his inability to perform his duties regularly during the above said period as it was only on account of his

ill-health and some family problems. But without considering any of his submissions, the Petitioner was dismissed

from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents management in dismissing the Petitioner from service

is wholly illegal, arbitrary,violative of the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has rendered continuous service

in the Respondents’ management. The Petitioner approached the Respondents to consider his case sympathetically,

but the management did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the Petitioner was constrained to approach this Tribunal to

declare the impugned order MMR/PER/D/072/10/2982 dated 26.5.2010 issued by the 2nd respondent and the

impugned order No.CRP/PER/IR/D/90/2050 dated 15.11.2010 issued by Respondent No.1 is illegal and arbitrary and

to set aside the same and consequently to direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting

all other attendant benefits such as continuity of service, back wages etc..

3.

The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief

which runs as follows:

In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner was

appointed in the Respondents’ company on 19.6.2007 as Badli Filler and continued to be in the same designation till

the date of his dismissal without regularization. He was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism,

after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has

attended the dates fixed for the enquiry and had fully participated in the enquiry. He was given full, fair and

reasonable opportunity to defend himself in the enquiry. The enquiry was conducted purely following the principles of

natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer, he submitted his report

holding the charges levelled against the Petitioner was proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry

proceeding was sent to the Petitioner by way of show cause notice giving him an opportunity to make representation

against the findings of the enquiry report; since the charge levelled against the Petitioner is proved and it was serious

in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the

enquiry proceeding and his past record and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view

and lastly, the Respondents were constrained to dismiss the Petitioner from service. It is stated that in fact the

Petitioner was irregular to his duties and he did not improve his attendance even after issuing charge sheet to him, and

after receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is justified and

legal and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.

4.

In view of the memo filed by the counsel for the Petitioner conceding the legality and validity of the

domestic enquiry conducted in the present case, the domestic enquiry conducted by the Respondents is held as legal

and valid vide order dated 18.4.2017.

5.

Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in

support of their claim.

6.

In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:

I.

Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the

punishment of dismissal from service to Sri SK. Shareef Pasha is legal and justified?

II.

Whether the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into service?

III.

If not, to what other relief he is entitled?

7.

Point No. I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner

submitted that due to illness, burning of his left leg, the Petitioner could not be able to attend his duty sincerely.

Even in his show cause the Petitioner has mentioned the above fact, but it was not considered during the course of the

enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Petitioner.

When the Petitioner has taken a stand that due to his illness, and other family problems he could not be able to attend

his duties regularly and remained absent, the authority should have considered his case while imposing punishment.

The authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Petitioner, and has given capital punishment to the

Petitioner when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company’s Standing Orders.

8.

On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that when the

Petitioner was a chronic absentee and was found guilty in the charges levelled against him, the punishment imposed

by the Respondents’ company is legal and proper. When the Petitioner was not sincere in his duty and failed to

maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated in service.

2706

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

9.

Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to his

illness, and other family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to be regular in his duty, the Petitioner has

remained absent in his duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his absenteeism followed by an enquiry.

In the enquiry, the charges levelled against the Petitioner were proved. For this, capital punishment was imposed.

After dismissal of service, the Petitioner has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family

members. He has already realised his mistake and has taken shelter in the court at the age of 25 years, he is now aged

about 33 years and is searching ways and means to provide bread and butter to his family members. When the

Petitioner being an able bodied and energetic man, has already realised his mistake and is coming forward to work

under the Respondents, atleast one chance should be given to him for reinstatement into service. Admittedly several

modes of punishment are enumerated in company’s Standing Orders. Though the Petitioner is not a first offender but

has worked for about 8 (eight) years under the Respondents. While imposing capital punishment to his employees, the

management should think of the condition of the workers as well as his family members. In this case, the punishment

imposed by the Respondents for dismissal of service is too harsh. Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action

taken by the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri SK. Shareef Pasha is not legal

and justified.

Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.

10.

Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from

service to Sri SK. Shareef Pasha is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the

Petitioner has already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for his reinstatement into service,

he should be given a chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Petitioner has become

jobless and he being the sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family members. In

such a circumstances atleast the Petitioner should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and to work under the

Respondents’ management. But in this case, the Petitioner has not come to the court soon after his dismissal of

service. Therefore, in the opinion of this Tribunal the Petitioner is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in his

claim petition. But he is only entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondents’ management.

Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.

ORDER

Proceeding No. MMR/PER/D/072/10/2982 dated 26.5.2010 issued by the 2nd Respondent and the impugned

order No.CRP/PER/IR/D/90/2050 dated 15.11.2010 issued by the 1st Respondent is declared as illegal and is hereby

set aside. It is ordered that the workman Sri SK. Shareef Pasha be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e., a badli

filler, on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the company

Medical Board and the workman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also directed

to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.

The Workman can not claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman

shall have to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the

management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short

fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman will not be terminated and he will

be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall of

attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without any further notice

and enquiry, and in case the workman completes one year probation period successfully he will continue in service till

the age of his attaining superannuation. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of Mine

accidents/Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company’s hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms and

conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for

appointment afresh.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 26th day of

February, 2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2707

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 661-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ

Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- ,y lh

34@2009½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FkkA

[la- ,y&22013@01@2019&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]

jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 661.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. LC 34/2009) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni Collieries

Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.

[No. L-22013/01/2019-IR(CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL-TRIBUNAL-CUM LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 19th day of March, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.No. 34/2009

Between:

Sri S. Anjaiah,

S/o Mallaiah,

C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,

Advocate, Flat No.G7,

Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,

Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls,

Kachiguda, Hyderabad .

..….Petitione

AND

1.

The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Bellampally (P), Bellampally,

Adilabad District.

2.

The Colliery Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Goleti-2 Incline,

Bellampally,

Adilabad District.

…Respondents

Appearances:

For the Petitioner :

M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates

For the Respondent : Sri S.M. Subhani, Advocate

AWARD

Sri S. Anjaiah who worked as General Mazdoor (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed this

petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents M/s. Singareni Collieries

Company Ltd., seeking for declaring the proceeding No.P.BPA/129/953 dated 1.4.1998 issued by Respondent No.1 as

illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into

service duly granting all the consequential benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other attendant

benefits etc., and such other reliefs as this court may deems fit.

2708

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2.

The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:

The Petitioner was appointed as Badli Filler in 1984 and later he was converted as General Mazdoor. But during the

year 1997 the Petitioner suffered with ill-health and other family problems as a result of which, he could not be

regular to his duties. While the matters stood thus, one charge sheet dated 28.4.1997 was served to the Petitioner by

the Respondents alleging that the Petitioner absented for duty during the year 1997 which amounts to misconduct

under company’s Standing Order No.25.25. Subsequently, one inquiry was conducted and during the time of the

enquiry, the Petitioner was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on

such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved and basing on the erroneous findings of the

Enquiry Officer, the Petitioner was dismissed from service w.e.f. 4.4.1998 vide order dated 1.4.1998. It is stated that

during the course of the enquiry the Petitioner has categorically stated about his inability to perform his duties

regularly during the above said period as it was only on account of his ill-health and some family problems. But

without considering any of his submissions, the Petitioner was dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action

of the Respondents’ management in dismissing the Petitioner from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the

principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has rendered about 14 years of continuous service in the Respondents’

management.The Petitioner approached the Respondents to consider his case sympathetically, but the management did

not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the Petitioner was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned

order No. P.BPA/129/953 dated 1.4.1998 issued by Respondent No.1 is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same

and consequently to direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all other attendant

benefits such as continuity of service, back wages etc..

3.

The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief

which runs as follows:

In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner was

appointed in the Respondents’ company on 17.6.1983 as Badli Filler and later he was regularized as General

Mazdoor with effect from 1.8.1984. He was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism, after

conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has attended

the dates fixed for the enquiry and had fully participated in the enquiry. He was given full, fair and reasonable

opportunity to defend himself in the enquiry. The enquiry was conducted purely following the principles of natural

justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer, he submitted his report holding

the charges levelled against the Petitioner was proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry proceeding was

sent to the Petitioner by way of show cause notice giving him an opportunity to make representation against the

findings of the enquiry report; since the charge levelled against the Petitioner is proved and it was serious in nature,

punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the enquiry

proceeding and his past record and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view and

lastly, the Respondents were constrained to dismiss the Petitioner from service. It is stated that in fact the Petitioner

was irregular to his duties and he did not improve his attendance even after issuing charge sheet to him, and after

receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is justified and legal

and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.

4.

In view of the memo filed by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner conceding the domestic enquiry held in

this case as legal and valid, the domestic enquiry conducted in this case by the Respondents is held as legal and valid

vide order dated 16.6.2010.

5.

Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in

support of their claim.

6.

In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:

I.

Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the

punishment of dismissal from service to Sri S. Anjaiah is legal and justified?

II.

Whether the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into service?

III.

If not, to what other relief he is entitled?

7.

Point No. I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner

submitted that due to his illness and other family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to attend his duty

sincerely. Even in his show cause the Petitioner has mentioned the above fact, but it has not been considered during

the course of the enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on

the Petitioner. When the Petitioner has taken a stand that due to his illness, and other family problems he could not be

able to attend his duties regularly and remained absent, the authority should have considered his case while imposing

punishment. The authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Petitioner, and has given capital

punishment to the Petitioner when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company’s Standing Orders.

8.

On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that when the

Petitioner was a chronic absentee and was found guilty in the charges levelled against him, the punishment imposed

by the Respondents’ company is legal and proper. When the Petitioner was not sincere in his duty and failed to

maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated in service.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2709

9.

Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to his

illness, and other family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to be regular in his duty, the Petitioner has

remained absent in his duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his absenteeism followed by an enquiry.

In the enquiry, the charges levelled against the Petitioner were proved. For this, capital punishment was imposed.

After dismissal of service, the Petitioner has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family

members. He has already realised his mistake and has taken shelter in the court at the age of 45 years, he is now aged

about 55 years and is searching ways and means to provide bread and butter to his family members. When the

Petitioner being an able bodied and energetic man has already realised his mistake and is coming forward to work

under the Respondents, atleast one chance should be given to him for reinstatement into service. Admittedly several

modes of punishment are enumerated in company’s Standing Orders. Though the Petitioner is a first offender and has

worked for about 14 years under the Respondents. While imposing capital punishment to his employees, the

management should think of the condition of the workman as well as his family members. In this case, the

punishment imposed on the workman by the Respondents for dismissal of service is too harsh. Therefore, it can

safely be stated that the action taken by the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri

S. Anjaiah is not legal and justified.

Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.

10.

Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from

service to Sri S. Anjaiah is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the Petitioner has

already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for his reinstatement into service he should be

given a chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Petitioner has become jobless and he

being the sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family members. In such a

circumstances atleast the Petitioner should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and to work under the

Respondents’ management. But in this case, the Petitioner has not come to the court soon after his dismissal of

service. Therefore, in the opinion of this Tribunal the Petitioner is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in his

claim petition. But he is only entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondents’ management.

Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.

ORDER

Proceeding No. P.BPA/129/953 dated 1.4.1998 issued by the 1st Respondent is declared as illegal and is

hereby set aside. It is ordered that the workman Sri S. Anjaiah be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e., a Badli

Filler on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the company

Medical Board and the workman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also directed

to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.

The Workman can not claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman

shall have to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the

management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short

fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman will not be terminated and he will

be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall of

attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without any further notice

and enquiry, and in case the workman completes one year of probation period successfully he will continue in service

till the age of his attaining superannuation. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of

Mine accidents/ Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company’s hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms and

conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for

appointment afresh.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 19th day of

March, 2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

2710

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 662-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ

Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- ,y lh

59@2009½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FkkA

[la- ,y&22013@01@2019&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]

jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 662.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. LC 59/2009) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni Collieries

Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.

[No. L-22013/01/2019-IR(CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present: Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 18th day of March, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.No. 59/2009

Between:

Sri Anga Ramulu,

S/o Ramulu,

R/o H.No.14-5-482,

Pittalanagar Post,

Karimnagar.

…Petitioner

AND

1.

The Chief General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Ramagundam Area-I,

Khammam District.

2.

The Superintendent of Mines,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

JDK-2 Incline, Ramagundam Division-I,

Khammam District.

… Respondents

Appearances:

For the Petitioner :

Sri M. Venkata Swamy, Advocate

For the Respondent :

Sri S.M. Subhani, Advocate

AWARD

Sri Anga Ramulu who worked as General Mazdoor (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed this

petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents M/s. Singareni Collieries

Company Ltd., seeking for declaring the dismissal order dated 4.9.2002 issued by the Respondent No.1 as illegal,

arbitrary and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly

granting all the consequential benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other attendant benefits etc.,

and such other reliefs as this court may deems fit.

2.

The Petitioner workman has filed his claim petition and Respondent also filed their respective counter

statement.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2711

3.

The domestic enquiry conducted in this case is held as legal and valid as it was not contested by the

Petitioner. The case stands posted for arguments, but the Petitioner did not turn up though several opportunities were

afforded to him.

4.

Inspite of availing several opportunities to adduce evidence, the Petitioner workman remained absent and

there is no representation on behalf of the Petitioner, which clearly indicates that perhaps the dispute of the Petitioner

has already been settled. In the circumstances stated above, it is felt that the Petitioner workman has got no claim to

raise. Thus, ‘No dispute’ award is passed.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 18th day

of March, 2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 663-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ

Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 31@2015½ dks

izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FkkA

[la- ,y&22012@04@2015&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]

jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 663.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 31/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni

Collieries Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.

[No. L-22012/04/2015-IR(CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present: Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 19th day of March, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 31/2015

Between:

The General Secretary (Sh. Riaz Ahmed),

Singareni Miners & Engg. Workers Union (HMS),

Qr. No. C-34, Sector-1, Godavarikhani-505 209.

Karimnagar District (Telengana State).

…Petitioner Union

AND

The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Ramagundam-I Area, Godavarikhani-505 209.

Karimnagar District (Telengana State).

…Respondent

2712

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Appearances:

For the Petitioner :

M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates

For the Respondent :

M/s. Nandigam Krishna Rao, N.S. Pattabhi Rama Rao & J. Narasimulu, Advocates

AWARD

This is a reference issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour and Employment, New Delhi

vide order No. L-22012/04/2015-IR(CM-II) dated 5.5.2015 whereunder this Tribunal is required to adjudicate the

dispute i.e.,

“Whether the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam-I

Area., Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District., in terminating the services of Sri Pothula Narasaiah, Ex-

Coal Filler, GDK-3 Inc., RG-I Area, with effect from 9.12.2013 is justified or not? If not, to what relief

the applicant is entitled for?

After receiving the above said reference this Tribunal registered the case as I D No.31/2015 and issued

notices to both the parties and secured their presence.

2.

The workman filed his claim statement with the averments in brief as follows:

The workman Sri Pothula Narasaiah, was initially appointed as a Badli Filler on 9.11.1992 and later he was

confirmed as Coal Filler on 27.12.1995. He wasregular to his duties and performing his duties upto the

satisfaction of all his superiors. While so, during the year 2001 the younger brother of the Petitioner workman

suffered with mental problems and there was no one to look after his ailing brother in his family. As he had to

take his ailing brother to various hospitals for treatment of mental illness, he could not be regular to his duties

during the year 2001. While the matters stood thus, charge sheet dated 9.10.2002 was issued to him by the

Respondent alleging that the Workman absented for duty during the year 2001, which amounts to misconduct

under company’s Standing Order No.25.25. The workman submitted his explanation to the charge sheet.

Subsequently, one inquiry was conducted and the Workman was not given any opportunity much less valid in

nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as

proved, and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer, the Workman was dismissed from service

w.e.f. 11.12.2003. It is stated that during the course of the enquiry the Workman has categorically stated about

his inability to perform his duties regularly during the year 2001, which was only on account of his younger

brother’s ill-health and other family problems. But without considering any of his submissions, the Workman was

dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondent’s management in dismissing the

Workman from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice. The Workman has

rendered 11 years of continuous service in the Respondent’s management. The Workman approached the

Respondent to consider his case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the

Workman was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order issued by the Respondent is

illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the Respondent to reinstate the Workman

into service duly granting all other attendant benefits such as continuity of service, and back wages etc..

3.

Respondent filed counter with the averments in brief as follows:

In the counter the Respondent while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Workman was

appointed in the Respondent’s company on 9.11.1992 as Badli Filler and subsequently appointed as coal filler on

1.9.1995. He was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism, after conducting a detailed domestic

enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Workman did not attend the enquiry, which was

conducted purely following the principles of natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced

before the Enquiry Officer, the Enquiry Officer conducted the enquiry and submitted his report holding the

charges levelled against the Workman was proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry proceeding was

sent to the Workman by way of show cause notice giving him an opportunity to make representation against the

findings of the enquiry oficer; since the charge levelled against the Workman is proved and it was serious in

nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the

enquiry proceeding and his past record and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take a lenient

view and lastly, the Respondent was constrained to dismiss the Workman from service. It is stated that in fact the

Workman was irregular to his duties and he did not improve his attendance even after issuing charge sheet to him,

and after receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Workman is

justified and legal and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.

4.

In view of the memo filed by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner Union/workman, conceding the

domestic enquiry conducted by the Respondents as legal and valid, the domestic enquiry conducted in this case is

held as legal and valid vide order dated 7.1.2019.

5.

Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in

support of their claim.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2713

6.

In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:

I.

Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the

punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Pothula Narasaiah is legal and justified?

II.

Whether the Workman is entitled for reinstatement into service?

III.

If not, to what other relief he is entitled?

7.

Point No. I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Workman

argued that due to his younger brother’s ill-health as well as other family problems, the Workman could not be

able to attend his duty sincerely. Even in his show cause the Workman has mentioned the above fact, but it has

not been considered during the course of the enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of

dismissal from service was imposed on the Workman. When the Workman has taken a stand that due to his

younger brother’s illness and other family problems he could not be able to attend his duties regularly and

remained absent, the authority should have considered his case sympathetically while imposing capital

punishment. The authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Workman, and has given capital

punishment to the Workman when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company’s Standing

Orders.

8.

On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent argued that when the

Workman was a chronic absentee and was found guilty of the charges levelled against him, the punishment

imposed by the Respondent’s company is legal and proper. When the Workman was not sincere in his duty and

failed to maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated into service.

9.

Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to

his younger brother’s mental illness and other family problems, the Workman could not be able to be regular in

his duty, the Workman has remained absent in his duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his

absenteeism followed by an enquiry. In the enquiry, the charges levelled against the Workman were proved. For

this, capital punishment was imposed on the workman. After dismissal of service, the Workman has become

jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family members. He has already realised his mistake and has

taken shelter in the court at the age of 42 years, he is now aged about 46 years and is searching ways and means

to provide bread and butter to his family members. When the Workman, being an able bodied and energetic man

and has already realised his mistake, and is coming forward to work under the Respondent, atleast one chance

should be given to him for reinstatement into service at the end of his service period. Admittedly several modes of

punishment are enumerated in company’s Standing Orders. Though the Workman is a first offender and has

worked for about 11 years under the Respondent, while imposing capital punishment to his employees, the

management should think of the condition of the workman as well as his family members. In this case, the

punishment imposed on the workman by the Respondent management for dismissal of service is too harsh.

Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action taken by the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal

from service to Sri Pothula Narasaiah is not legal and justified.

Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.

10.

Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from

service to Sri Pothula Narasaiah is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the

Workman has already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for reinstatement into service

he should be given a chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Workman has become

jobless and he being the sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family

members. In such a circumstances atleast the Workman should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and

to work under the Respondent’s management. But in this case, the Workman has not come to the court soon after

his dismissal of service. Therefore, in the opinion of this Tribunal the Workman is not entitled to get all the relief

as claimed in his claim petition. But he is only entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondent’s

management.

Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.

RESULT:

In the result, the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam-I

Area., Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District., in terminating the services Sri Pothula Narasaiah, Ex-Coal Filler,

GDK-3 Inc., RG-I Area, with effect from 9.12.2003 is not justified and is hereby set aside. It is ordered that the

workman be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e., Badli filler in Cat.I, on initial basic pay without back

wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the company Medical Board and the workman be

kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also directed to take an undertaking of good

behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.

2714

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

The Workman cannot claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman

shall have to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the

management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any

short fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman shall not be terminated

and he will be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of

any shortfall of attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without

any further notice and enquiry and in the event of completion of one year of probation satisfactorily, the workman

is to continue in service till the age of attaining superannuation. The management shall consider any forced

absenteeism on account of Mine accidents/ Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company’s hospital, as

attendance. All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work,

day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for his appointment afresh and the reference is answered accordingly, so

also the, award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 19th day

of March, 2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Workman

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Workman

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 664-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ

Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 39@2015½ dks

izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FkkA

[la- ,y&22012@24@2015&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]

jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 664.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 39/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni

Collieries Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.

[No. L-22012/24/2015-IR(CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 28th day of February, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 39/2015

Between:

The President

(Bandari Satyanarayana),

Rashtriya Collieries Mazdoor Sangh(INTUC),

Rajkumar Complex, Saibaba Temple Road,

Jaffar nagar, Mancherial – 504208.

Adilabad District.

…Petitioner Union

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2715

AND

The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Bellampally Area, Goleti Township-504292.

Adilabad Distt.

…Respondent

Appearances :

For the Petitioner

:

None

For the Respondent

:

Sri Dasaradha Ramulu, Advocate

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-22012/24/2015-IR(CM-II) dated

18.6.2015 referred the following dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

and their workman under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal. The reference is,

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Bellampalli Area,

Goleti Township(P.O.), Adilabad Distt. in terminating the services of Sri Bandi Raja Komuru, Ex-Coal

Filler, Goleti-2 Inc., SCCo.Ltd., Bellampalli Area with effect from 23.5.2001 is justified or not? If not,

to what relief the applicant is entitled for?”

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 39/2015 and notices were issued to the parties concerned.

2. The case stands posted for filing of claim statement and documents by the Petitioner.

3. The case was posted for filing of claim statement by the Petitioner union. Inspite of availing several

opportunities, the Petitioner union remained absent and there was no representation on behalf of the

Petitioner/Union. Non-appearance of the workman/Petitioner Union and non-filing of claim statement in time,

clearly indicates that perhaps the parties have settled their dispute and the workman/Petitioner Union has no claim

to raise. Hence, it is not desirable to linger the case to any further date. Thus, the case of the workman/Petitioner

Union is closed and a ‘No dispute’ award is passed.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant, corrected by me on this the 28th day

of February, 2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for the

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 665-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

esllZ ,l-bZ-lh-,y ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 80@2001½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FkkA

[la- ,y&22012@251@2000&vkbZvkj ¼lh-II½]

jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

2716

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 665.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 80/2001) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s SECL and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 23/04/2019.

[No. L-22012/251/2000-IR(C-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/80/2001

Shri Ram Naresh Vishwakarma,

S/o Mangal Prasad Vishwakarma,

C/o M.L.Vishwakarma,

Asstt. Engineer (St.RE),

MP Electricity Board, Sidhi (MP) …Workman

Versus

Sub Area Manager,

Bungwar Sub Area of SECL,

PO Beomhauri,

Distt. Shahdol (MP) …Management

AWARD

Passed on this 9th day of April 2019

1.

As per letter dated 27-4-2001 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labor, New Delhi, the reference

is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification

No.L-22012/251/2000-IR(C-II). The dispute under reference relates to:

“Whether the action of the management of Sub Area Manager, Bungler Sub Area of SECL, PO

Beomhauri, Distt. Shahdol (MP) in dismissing of Shri Ram Naresh Vishwakarma S/o Shri Mangal

Prasad Viswakarma General Mazdoor Category-I from services from 8-1-96 is legal and justified? If

not, to what relief the workman is entitled?”

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Workman filed statement of claim. In his

statement of claim, workman alleged that he was first appointed as ITI Apprentice in Electrical Trade on

1-12-92 by Dy.Chief Personal Manager of the employers and after completing 1 year training on 1-2-94,

he was appointed as General Mazdoor Category-I on 16-2-94 in pay scale of NCWA-IV by Chief

Personal Manager SECL, Sohagpur. During the course of his employment, he suffered from Hepatitis

and as there was no one to look after him at the project, he went to his brother’s place at Sidhi where he

was referred to Gandhi Clinic for treatment. He was under treatment of consulting Doctor at Gandhi

Clinic Sidhi since November 94, was advised rest, hence unable to perform his duties for about 5 months.

A showcause notice dated 16-4-96 was issued by employer management alleging that he remained

absent since 22-11-94 which was a misconduct under order 26.24 & 26.23 of standing orders and was

required to explain within 74 hours. He sent his reply with medical certificate vide registered letter dated

1-5-95, received by management on 5-5-95, received by management on 5-5-95. It was further alleged

that the workman further suffered from Hepatitis and depression as well psychophobia and was under

continuous treatment of Doctor Praveen Kumar, Medical College Rewa till 27-1-97 and when after

recovery reported himself for duty in the office of employers, he was not permitted to join his duty by the

management. It is the case of the workman that he was never served any notice from the management

regarding any enquiry. He submitted his representation to the management which was not considered.

Thereafter he raised a dispute with the Asstt. Labor Commissioner. After failure of conciliation, the

dispute was referred by the Central Government to this Tribunal. According to the workman, the charge

against him was as follows:-

“On verification of record, it is found that you are absent from your work from 22-11-94 without any

information. This action of yours constitutes misconduct under Section 26.24 and 26.30 of company

stand order.

Section 26.24 Habit of absent without sufficient reason or habit of coming late.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2717

Section 26.30 To remain absent without sanctioned leave or sufficient reason from work or remain absent

from more than sanctioned leave.”

3. Workman further alleged that the domestic enquiry held by the Enquiry Officer regarding the charges

was improper, invalid and illegal on following grounds, as mentioned in para 17 &18 0f statement of

claim-

Para 17 - That the domestic enquiry held by enquiry officer of the above charges levelled against the

workman/first party was improper, invalid and illegal interalia, on the following grounds:-

(a) That chargesheet was never served to the delinquent workman and thus very initiation of the

disciplinary proceedings was bad in law.

(b) That the enquiry held by the management/ 2nd party was not just proper and lawful as the workman

was not informed duly.

(c) That the principles of the natural justice were not followed by the management/2nd party as the

workman/Ist party was not informed properly therefore, he could not defend his case properly.

(d) The illness of somebody is always beyond his controlled and he cannot be punished for that act

which is not within his control and thus the act of the workman does not cover under the act or so

called misconduct.

(e) That there is not a single evidence on record which could constitute the so called misconduct

(f) That so far as misconduct 26.30 was concerned there arose no occasion to get first leave sanctioned

and only than fell sick, in case of sickness imposition of it as condition present before availing have

neither could nor should be said just and proper nor it was intended by the certified standing orders.

None of the conduct of the delinquent workman constitute or amount to misconduct under the

certified standing order.

(g) That, the enquiry proceeding held behind the back of the workman/Ist party are unjust and illegal as

the principal of natural justice are not followed in this regard.

Para-18: That the Enquiry Officer who conducted the enquiry

(a) Was not acting bonafide and was actuated with some extraneous or ulterior motives.

(b) That the finding of the enquiry officer is perverse, management failed to prove any misconduct of

delinquent workman was charged with.

(c) That the management/second party failed completely to consider the contentions raised by the

delinquent workman in his reply to the showcause notice.

(d) That the punishment imposed on delinquent workman is too severe to smeek of victimization. The

service rendered by this workman were ignored and not taken in account by the management who

awarded with such a harsh punishment to a poor workman.

4. Workman accordingly prayed for declaration of his termination illegal and his reinstatement in job with

all the incidental benefits therewith annual and quarterly bonus with interest.

5. In the Written Statement of defense filed by the employer management, it was pleaded that habitual

absence without leave or long absenteeism without prior permission has to be held misconduct under the

certified standing order applicable to the workman. Workman absented himself without getting his leave

sanctioned and without prior permission. Thereafter a charge sheet was issued against him regarding the

charges of habitual absenteeism without sufficient reason and long absenteeism from duty without prior

information and getting leave sanctioned. Vide order dated 1-7-95, the Enquiry Officer fixed 12-7-95

and notice was sent to the workman on his address furnished by him and recorded in Form B Register,

maintained by office of the management but this notice was returned unserved with the endorsement

that addressee was not available therefore another dated 28-7-95 was fixed by the Enquiry Officer and

other registered notice was sent on the same address which was also returned unserved with the same

endorsement. Thereafter another dated 18-8-95 was fixed as next date in the enquiry and 3rd notice was

sent by registered post on the address which was also returned with the endorsement “addressee’s

whereabouts not known”. In these circumstances, Enquiry Officer proceeded that the enquiry is ex parte

and after recording evidence, submitted his report holding the workman guilty for the charges levelled

against him. According to the proved charges, the attendance for the period of his employment i.e. from

16-2-94 to 22-11-94 i.e. the period in which he was in employment. He absented himself details of

which has been given by the management in para-15 of Written Statement.

2718

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

“That according to the records of colliery it was also proved that the workman was absenting

unauthorizedly without giving intimation to the Manager of the mines since he joined duty. The

attendance for the period of his employment i.e. 16-2-1994 to 22-11-94 till he was absconded without

sanctioned leave/ any intimation to the management is given here under:-

Month

Attendance

February 1994

01 days

March 1994

17 days

April 1994

24 days

May 1994

18 days

June 1994

20 days

July 1994

16 days

August 1994

10 days

September 1994

11 days

October 1994

05days

November 1994

07 days

The Disciplinary Officer after agreeing with the findings of Enquiry Officer regarding proof of misconduct

as mentioned above, the services of workman was terminated after approval of competent authority but

before inflicting punishment, another show cause notice was also given to the workman on 10-10-95 and no

reply was sent by workman. It was also pleaded that appeal was preferred to the Appellate Authority who

did not find any merit in the case and dismissed the appeal vide order dated 11-12/3/98. Since the workman

had absented himself without any information and without any sanctioned leave or any justification, the

enquiry was held against him which was conducted after giving full opportunity to the workman but since

he had absconded from the address furnished by him and was not traceable, the enquiry proceeded exparte

against him. It was also pleaded that the workman never filed any papers regarding treatment or medical

certificate nor did he availed a well equipped treatment facility which is free of cost, provided by the

employers in the hospital maintained by the employers at his work place. Accordingly it was submitted that

the reference be decided against the workman.

6. Workman did not file any rejoinder.

7. On the basis of pleadings, following preliminary issue/point for determination was framed by my learned

predecessor vide order dated 15-6-2010-

8. “Whether the Departmental Enquiry conducted against workman is proper and legal?”

9. After recording evidence on this issue, it was held by my learned predecessor since public notice regarding

enquiry was not issued, the domestic enquiry was not legal and proper against workman. This order is part

of this award.

10. It transpires from the record that the management sought permission to prove charges before the Tribunal.

Management filed documents charge sheet dated 6-4-94, office order dated 1-7-95, notice dated 1-7-95,

registered post notice dated 20-21/7/95, registered post notice dated 29-7-95 ( 2 papers), registered post

statement of witnesses recorded during enquiry, certificate regarding last date of presence issued and filed

during enquiry, attendance particulars filed during enquiry, Enquiry Report, show cause notice dated

10-10-95 regarding the findings of enquiry before passing sentence, recommendation of Disciplinary

Authority, order of termination dated 8-1-96 along with receipt of registered post by which the order was

sent, 2 representations of workman dated 29-1-1967, reminder dated 1997, Order dated 18-3-98 rejecting

the representation and prove it which are Exhibit M-1 to M-23 respectively. Management examined on

oath its witness Rajmani Singh and Manish Bhandari who were cross examined by workman on the point of

proof of charge. Workman examined himself on oath and was cross-examined.

11. I have heard argument of Shri Sanjay Verma, learned counsel for workman and Shri A.K.Shashi, learned

counsel for employers/management and have perused the record. After perusal of record in the light of rival

argument, following other points come up in this case for determination:-

(2)

Whether charges of misconduct levelled against workman has been successfully proved

against the workman?

(3)

Whether the punishment given is disproportionate to the charges levelled?

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2719

12. Point for Determination No.2-

According to Written Statement of defense filed by the management, the charge against workman is that he

was habitual unauthorizedly absenting himself without prior information/ getting leave sanctioned within a

period of his employment from 16-2-94 to 22-11-94 and continuous unauthorized absence without prior

information/ sanction of leave without any justifiable ground for a period 1-12-94 to 30-6-95 and thereafter.

13. According to management, this absence was unauthorized, without any prior intimation/sanction. In his

written statement of claim, workman admits that he suffered from Hepatitis and went to his brother’s place at

Sidhi where he was treated in Gandhi Clinic Sidhi since 18-11-94 and was advised rest hence unable to

perform the duties for 5 months. He was under continuous treatment under Dr.Praveen Kumar, Medical

College, Rewa till 27-1-95 so the absence during the period in the charge atleast so far as it relates to

continuous absence is admitted by the workman himself. This charge is further corroborated by the statement

on oath recorded before the Court by statement of witness Rajmani Singh who was working as a clerk/

timekeeper with the management office. He has stated that workman was working as General Mazdoor

Category -I. he absented himself since December 1994 till 30-6-94 continuously. Regarding 2nd charge of

habitual absentee, this witness has stated on oath that the workman has been absented unauthorizedly without

giving information to the Manager of the Mines since he joined duty. The attendance for the period of his

employment i.e. from 16-2-94 to 22-11-94 is as under:-

Month

Attendance

February 1994

01 days

March 1994

17 days

April 1994

24 days

May 1994

18 days

June 1994

20 days

July 1994

16 days

August 1994

10 days

September 1994

11 days

October 1994

05days

November 1994

07 days

This witness further states that thereafter he absented himself unauthorizedly without any intimation till

30-6-1994. This witness further states that management has provided medical facilities for coal mine workers

for which dispensary and central hospital are opened where free treatments are given by qualified Doctors in

Sohagpur Area but workman did not avail free treatment and never complained of any disease. Workman

never produced any medical certificate for sanction of leave, he absconded from work without any

intimation. this witness further stated that workman never furnish any intimation regarding his whereabouts

during the said period. The witness further stated that the attendance summary register which is Exhibit M-21

is in his signature prepared by him. In his cross examination, this witness has stated that period of absence

mentioned in his affidavit filed as his examination-in-chief, has been stated on the basis of attendance

summary register which is with management. he admits that the recording of attendance was not part of his

job and he pleaded ignorance whether absence of workman was unauthorized or not.

14. Shri Manish Bhandari, Dy.Manager Personnel is another witness of management who has supported the case

of Ist witness of management on the point of habitual absenteeism and unauthorized long absence of

workman as mentioned in the statement of Ist management witness. Thus statement of this witness

corroborates the statement of Ist witness on the point of absence. As has already been mentioned earlier,

absence is not disputed by the workman rather he admits it with a case that he was under treatment during

this period which he was receiving at his brother’s place in Sidhi.

15. Para 106 Indian Evidence Act requires to be referred here which is as under:-

“Burden of proving fact especially within knowledge-When any fact is especially within the knowledge

of any. person, the burden of proving that fact is upon him.”

This fact makes it clear that when a fact is in special knowledge of any person, burden of proving that fact is

on that person hence the burden of proving the fact that he was ill and was under medical treatment during

the period of his absence from duty lies on the workman. This burden can be discharged by filing

documentary evidence for example Medical Certificate, certificate of fitness, documents regarding diagnosis

2720

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

and treatment or by examining the Doctor under whose treatment the workman was during the period in

question. Workman did not file any fitness certificate or medical certificate or any paper regarding diagnosis

or treatment nor did he examined any Doctor under whose treatment he was during the period in question.

The workman has examined himself on oath. He has stated in his affidavit filed as his examination-in-chief

that he never absented himself during his service period whenever he remained on leave, he had filed his

application for leave and during the period of his sickness also, he had filed his application for leave except

this self serving statement, there is no document in support. He admits that the dispensary and hospital

facilities are available to the workman and their families near the mines and in Sohagpur. He pleads

ignorance about the free treatment given to workman in the management’s hospital. When the management

witness has stated that the workman did not file any certificate or papers regarding his illness and treatment,

the burden of proving the fact that he had filed application with the management, is on the workman and he

has failed to discharge this burden. Thus from the comparative analysis of evidence as respect to above

produced by the parties, it comes out that firstly, the workman absented himself during the period as

mentioned above and secondly,the reason for absence alleged by the workman is not established. Hence it is

held that the absence of workman for the period as mentioned above is without sufficient cause, meaning

thereby it is held proved that the workman absented himself during the period in question as referred

above unauthorizedly, without informing the management and without any leave sanctioned. It will not

be out of scope to refer the case of New India Assurance Company Ltd versus Vipin Beharilal Srivastava

reported in (2008)3 Supreme Court Cases 446. The Apex Court has laid down that mere sending an

application for grant of leave is not sufficient. In para-11 of the judgment, the court has observed as follows-

Para-11 The rules governing “leave” read as follows:

(1) General principles governing grant of leave. The following general principles shall govern the grant of

leave to the employees;

(a)

Leave cannot be claimed as a matter of right.

(b)

Leave shall be availed of only after sanction by the competent authority, but one days casual leave

may be availed of without prior sanction in case of unforeseen emergency, provided the head of the

office is promptly advised of the circumstances under which prior sanction could not be obtained.

(4) Sick leave-

(c)

Sick leave can be granted to an employee only on production of a medical certificate from a

registered medical practitioner, which term would include homeopathic, ayurvedic and Unani

Doctor also provided they are registered medical practitioners.

(d)

The certificate should state as clearly as possible the diagnosis and probable duration of treatment.”

16. A reference of Rule 12.5 & Rule 13 of Certified Standing Orders applicable in the case of parties , referred to

by learned counsel for management is also necessary which is as under:-

Rule 12.5: Application for leave or extension of leave on medical grounds shall be supported by a

certificate from a Medical Officer of the company or where there is no such officer, a government Medical

Officer or failing him, from a Registered Medical practitioner, stating the period for which leave is

recommended. On receipt of such application, the sanctioning authority shall immediately inform the

workman in writing whether the leave or extension of leave has been granted and if so for what period. An

employee who has been sanctioned leave or an extension of leave on medical ground for a period exceeding

14 days at a time shall not be allowed to resume duty unless he produced a certificate o fitness. If no

information is received by the workman, from the management, regarding leave in question as applied for,

it may be presumed to be granted.”

Rule-13: Application for leave:- A workman who desires to obtain leave of absence shall apply in writing

to the Competent Authority, not less than 15 days before the commencement of the leave, except where

leave is required in unforeseen circumstances and the competent authority shall issue orders on the

application within a week of its submission of two days prior to the commencement of the leave applied for

whichever is earlier, provided that if the leave applied for is to commence on the date of the application or

within three days thereof orders shall be given on the same day. If the leave is refused or postponed, the fact

of such refusal or postponement and the reasons therefor shall be recorded in writing in a register to be

maintained for the purpose and if the workman so desires a copy of the entry in the register shall be

supplied to him. If the workman after proceeding on leave, desires an extension thereof, he shall apply to

the competent authority who shall send a written reply either granting or refusing extension of leave to the

workman. Sanction/ refusal of leave shall be communicated to the workman in writing.

Similarly Rule 26.24 & 26.25 which deal with misconduct are also being reproduced as follows:-

Rule 26.24- Habitual late attendance or habitual absence from duty without sufficient cause.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2721

Rule 26.25- Distributing or exhibiting in the company’s work premises or estates, hand bills, pamphlets,

posters or causing them to be displayed by means of signs or writing or other visible representations any

matter prejudicial to the company without prior sanction of the management.

It is therefore, held in the light of evidence discussed above that the workman failed to comply the

provisions and his absence, held unauthorized and habitual, the charges against the workman are held

proved.

Point No for determination No.2 is answered accordingly.

17. Point for determination No.3- Rule 27.1 of certified standing order provides about penalties in case of

misconduct. One of the penalty is removal/discharge from service and dismissal from service. Now question

arises whether the punishment of removal of workman on the charges proved as mentioned is proportionate

to the misconduct or not.

18. Learned counsel for management has referred to case Ever Ready Industries India Ltd, Jabalpur and

others versus P.S.Parihar and another reported in 2003(3)MPHT-257 wherein it has been observed by

the Hon’ble High Court that employer has justified in weeding out the worthless who have lost utility

for the company. In the referred case, also the workman remained continuously sick for a long period and

did not recover. His termination was confirmed by Hon’ble High Court. In case of New India Assurance

Company Ltd.(Supra) also, the Apex Court refused to set-aside the dismissal of employee who remained

continuously absent for long period without any justification. Keeping this preposition of law inn view, the

dismissal of workman for the charges is held legal and justified. Workman is held not entitled to any relief.

Point No.2 is answered accordingly.

19. In the result, award is passed as under:-

(1) The action of the management of Sub Area Manager, Bungler Sub Area of SECL in dismissing

Shri Ram Naresh Vishwakarma S/o Shri Mangal Prasad Viswakarma General Mazdoor

Category-I from services from 8-1-96 is legal and justified.

(2) The workman Shri Ram Naresh Vishwakarma is not entitled to any relief.

20. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labor & Employment as per

rules.

Dated:9-4-2019

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 666-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

eSllZ Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa

fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la-

40@2015½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA

[la- ,y&22012@25@2015&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]

jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 666.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 40/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni

Collieries Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.

[No. L-22012/25/2015-IR(CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

2722

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 28th day of February, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 40/2015

Between:

Sri Ramtenki Kistaiah,

H.No.1-85,

Bellampalli (M)-504251.

Adilabad Distt.

…Petitioner

AND

The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Bellampally Area, Goleti Township-504292.

Adilabad Distt.

…Respondent

Appearances:

For the Petitioner

:

None

For the Respondent

:

Sri Dasaradha Ramulu, Advocate

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-22012/25/2015-IR(CM-II) dated 18.6.2015

referred the following dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their

workman under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal. The reference is,

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Bellampalli Area,

Goleti Township(P.O.), Adilabad Distt. in terminating the services of Sri Ramtenki Kistaiah, Ex-Badli Filler,

Goleti-1 Inc., SCCo.Ltd., Bellampalli Area with effect from 1.4.2005 is justified or not? If not, to what relief

the applicant is entitled for?”

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 40/2015 and notices were issued to the parties concerned.

2.

The case stands posted for filing of claim statement and documents by the Petitioner.

3.

The case was posted for filing of claim statement by the Petitioner. Inspite of availing several opportunities,

the Petitioner remained absent and there was no representation on behalf of the Petitioner. Non-appearance of the

Petitioner and non-filing of claim statement in time, clearly indicates that perhaps the parties have settled their dispute

and the Petitioner has no claim to raise. Hence, it is not desirable to linger the case to any further date. Thus, the case

of the Petitioner is closed and a ‘No dispute’ award is passed.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant, corrected by me on this the 28th day of February,

2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2723

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 667-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

eSllZ Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa

fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la-

66@2013½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA

[la- ,y&22012@51@2013&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]

jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 667.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 66/2013) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni

Collieries Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.

[No. L-22012/51/2013-IR(CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 26th day of February, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 66/2013

Between:

The General Secretary (Sri Riaz Ahmed),

M/s. Singareni Mines & Engg. Workers Union (HMS),

Qr.No.C-34, Sector-I,

Godavarikhani – 505 209, Karimnagar District.

…Petitioner Union

AND

The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Limited,

Ramagundam-I Area,

Godavarikhani – 505 209.

Karimnagar Distt.

…Respondent

Appearances:

For the Petitioner

:

M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocate

For the Respondent

:

M/s. P.A.V.V.S. Sarma & Vijaya Laxmi Panguluri, Advocates

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-22012/51/2013-IR(CM-II) dated

30.5.2013 referred the following dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

and their workman under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal. The reference

is,

SCHEDULE

‘‘Whether the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam-I Area,

Godavarikhani, Karimnagar Distt. In terminating the services of Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani, Ex-Staff

Nurse, Area Hospital SCCo. Ltd., Ramagundam-I Area, Godavarikhani Area w.e.f. 18.1.2000 is justified or

not? If not, to what relief the applicant is entitled for?”

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 66/2013 and notices were issued to the parties.

2.

The averments made in the claim statement in brief are as follows:

The Petitioner Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani, was appointed as Staff Nurse on 4.8.1989 and was working for the

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. While so the concerned work woman has applied for 3 days leave from

2724

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

29.5.2005 to 3.6.2005 and also availed play day on 4.6.2005. But she could not report for the duty on 5.6.2005 as her

father was in serious condition and her presence was very much essential and she continued to assist him regularly. In

the mean while, the concerned workwoman also fell sick and her daughter Kum. Alekhya Jayanthi also fell sick.

While the matters stood thus, charge sheet dated 13.12.2005 was issued to the Petitioner by the Respondents alleging

that the Petitioner absented for duty during the year 2008 which amounts to misconduct under company’s Standing

Order No.25.25. Subsequently, one inquiry was conducted and during the time of the enquiry, the Petitioner could not

submit her explanation to the charge sheet and that she could not participate in the enquiry also. As a result of which

an exparte enquiry was conducted. Basing on such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved

and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer, the workwoman was dismissed from service vide order

dated 31.8.2006 with effect from 7.9.2006. But without considering any of her submissions, the workwoman was

dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents management in dismissing the Petitioner

workwoman from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner

workwoman has rendered about 17 years of continuous service in the Respondents’ management. The Petitioner

workwoman approached the Respondents to consider her case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any

heed to it. Therefore, the Petitioner workwoman was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned

order No.CRP/PER/IR/D/92/4831 dated 31.8.2006 issued by the 1st respondent is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside

the same and consequently to direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner workwoman into service duly granting

all other attendant benefits such as continuity of service, back wages etc..

3. The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief

which runs as follows:

In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner

workwoman was appointed in the Respondents’ company on 6.8.1989 as Junior Staff Nurse and was promoted to ‘C’

and ‘B’ grades on 8.9.1980 and 4.9.2000 respectively and has been working in Sector-III dispensary of the

Respondents’ company. It is submitted that the Petitioner workwoman was sanctioned 6 days leave for the period

from 29.5.2005 to 3.6.2005. She was to report for duty on 5.6.2005, but she did not resume her duty on 5.6.2005,

and has been continuously absenting from duty. She was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism,

after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner did not

attend on the dates fixed for the enquiry and finally as a last chance the enquiry notice was published in the Telugu

Daily Newspaper on 5.5.2006 fixing the date of enquiry, but she did not attend the enquiry on the date fixed. She was

given full, fair and reasonable opportunity to defend herself. As such, an exparte enquiry was conducted purely

following the principles of natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer,

he submitted his report holding the charges levelled against the Petitioner was proved. A copy of the enquiry report

and the enquiry proceeding was sent to the Petitioner workwoman by way of show cause notice giving her an

opportunity to make representation against the findings of the enquiry report; since the charge levelled against the

Petitioner workwoman is proved and it was serious in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The

Disciplinary Authority has gone through the enquiry proceeding and her past record and found that there was no

extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view and lastly, the Respondents were constrained to dismiss the Petitioner

workwoman from service. It is stated that in fact the Petitioner workwoman was irregular to her duties and she did

not improve her attendance even after issuing charge sheet to her, and after receiving the show cause notice. It is

further stated that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner workwoman is justified and legal and as such the claim

petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.

4.

In view of the memo filed by the counsel for the Petitioner not to contest the validity of the domestic enquiry

conducted in the present case, the domestic enquiry conducted by the Respondents is held as legal and valid vide order

dated 14.9.2017.

5.

Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in

support of their claim.

6.

In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:

I.

Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the

punishment of dismissal from service to Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani is legal and justified?

II.

Whether the Petitioner workwoman is entitled for reinstatement into service?

III.

If not, to what other relief she is entitled?

7.

Point No. I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner

workwoman submitted that due to her illness, illness of her father and also her daughter, the Petitioner workwoman

could not be able to attend her duty sincerely. Even in her representation the Petitioner workwoman has mentioned

the above fact, but it has not been considered during the course of the enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital

punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Petitioner workwoman. When the Petitioner workwoman

has taken a stand that due to her illness, and other family problems she could not be able to attend her duties

regularly and remained absent, the authority should have considered her case while imposing punishment. The

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2725

authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Petitioner workwoman, and has given capital punishment

to the Petitioner workwoman when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company’s Standing Orders.

8.

On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that when the

Petitioner workwoman was a chronic absentee and was found guilty in the charges levelled against her, the

punishment imposed by the Respondents’ company is legal and proper. When the Petitioner workwoman was not

sincere in her duty and failed to maintain minimum musters in a year she is not entitled to be reinstated in service.

9.

In fact, due to illness the Petitioner has remained absent in her duties and a proceeding was initiated against

her for her absenteeism followed by an enquiry. In the enquiry, the Petitioner workwoman did not participate and the

charges levelled against the workwoman were proved. For this, capital punishment has been imposed. After

dismissal of service, the workwoman has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to her family members.

She has already realised her mistake and has taken shelter in the Tribunal and is ready to provide bread and butter to

her family members. When she has already realised her mistake atleast one chance should be given to her for

reinstatement into service. Admittedly several modes of punishment are enumerated in company’s Standing Orders.

The Petitioner workwoman is a first offender and has worked more than 17 years under the Respondents. When

punishment has been imposed, her past conduct has not been considered. While imposing capital punishment to his

employees, the management should think of the condition of the workwoman as well as her family members, so also

her past conduct. In this case, the punishment imposed by the Respondents for dismissal of service is too harsh.

Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action of the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal from

service to Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani is not legal and justified.

This point is answered accordingly.

10.

Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from

service to Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when

the Petitioner workwoman has already realised her mistake and has come to the Tribunal with a prayer for her

reinstatement into service she should be given a chance to serve for her family members. Now, after dismissal of

service the workwoman has become jobless and she being the sole earning member of her family, is unable to

provide a square meal to her family members. In such a circumstances, atleast the Petitioner workwoman should be

given a chance to maintain her livelihood and to work under the Respondents’ management. But, in the circumstances

stated above, the workwoman is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in her petition. But the Petitioner

workwoman is entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondents’ management.

Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.

Result:

The action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam-I Area,

Godavarikhani, Karimnagar Distt. in terminating the services of Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani, Ex-Staff Nurse, Area

Hospital SCCo. Ltd., Ramagundam-I Area, Godavarikhani Area w.e.f. 18.1.2000 is not justified. Proceeding No.

CRP/PER/IR/D/92/4831 dated 31.8.2006 issued by Respondent No.1 is declared as illegal and is hereby set aside. It

is ordered that the workwoman Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e., Staff

Nurse on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the company

Medical Board and the workwoman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also

directed to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workwoman at the time of her posting.

The workwoman can not claim for her posting in the same place, where she was last employed. The

workman shall have to either maintain minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the

management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short

fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman will not be terminated and she

will be cautioned to improve her performance by issuing her a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall

of attendance during one year of service of the workman, she will be terminated from service without any further

notice and enquiry. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of Mine accidents/ Natural

disasters, taking treatment in the company’s hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms and conditions of

appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for appointment

afresh.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 26th day of

February, 2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

2726

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the

Witnesses examined for the

Petitioner

Respondent

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 668-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

eSllZ ,u-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 9@2014½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23-04-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&22015@12@2013&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]

jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 668.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 9/2014) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of NCL and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on 23-04-2019.

[No. L-22015/12/2013-IR(CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/9/2014

General Secretary,

Bhartiya Koyla Khadan Shramik Sandh (BMS),

Amlohri Project Branch,

PO Amlohri,

Distt. Sidhi (MP)

…Workman

Vs.

Chief General Manager,

Amlohri Project, NCL,

PO Amlohri,

Distt. Sidhi (MP)

…Management

AWARD

Passed on this 5th day of April, 2019

1.

As per letter dated 28-1-2014 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labor, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-

22015/12/2013-IR(CM-II).The dispute under reference relates to:

“Whether the fixation of Shri Madhusudan Prasad Mishra by the Chief General Manager, Amlohri

Project, NCL PO Amlohri, Distt. Singrauli on his (Shri Mishra’s) requested reversion due to ill-health

to the post of Driver Category-V from Dumper Operator Category Grade II was not in order as his

promotion/ upgradation were not taken into consideration. If so, what benefit Shri Madhusudan

Prasad Mishra be entitled to i.e. arrears of difference of pay and promotion?

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2727

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Workman filed statement of claim. In his

statement of claim, he submitted that he was initially appointed as Driver Cat-V on 15-5-84, promoted as

dumper operator Grade II on 20-2-87 and later on he got salary to the post of Dumper Operator Grade I

because he operated higher capacity machine.

3. Vide order dated 11-4-94 issued by Dy.Chief Personal Manager, Amlohri Project, he was reverted due to

illness i.e. asthma which was born due to sand and dust. On 11-4-94, he was getting salary @Rs.71.43 as

basic pay and after his reversion as Driver Category V, his basic pay was reduced and was fixed @ Rs.44.50.

vide order dated 7-6-1999, his salary was protected on the basis of recommendation and past services and he

was fixed at basic pay of Rs.104.90 per day which is related to the salary of Dumper Operator Grade II. It

was also alleged that at per cadre scheme of N.C.L. the post of driver operator and car operator are of two

different cadres and further that vide order dated 6/7-11-2003, workman was selected as crane operator

Grade-III, and at present working as crane operator Grade I. It is the claim of workman that at the time of

reversion i.e. on 11-4-94, wages of workman were fixed in the pay scale provided in NCWA-IV(National

Coal Wage Agreement) and at the time of protection of pay provided in NCWA-V, hence the workman is

entitled to get the difference of wages and pay for the period from 11-4-94 to 7-6-99. Accordingly, workman

has claimed the difference of wages from 11-4-94 to 7-6-99 as per NCWA-IV & V which is about 6 lakhs.

4. In their written statement of defense, the employers admitted that the workman was initially appointed as

Driver Cat-V as alleged by him and was working as dumper operator Grade I in the pay scale of 31.99-1.76-

56.63(MCWA-III) and his basic salary was fixed Rs.33.75 per day. On 29-3-94, he submitted an application

before Chief General Manager stating that he was suffering from asthma and has been medically advised to

avoid dust hence unable to perform the duties of dumper operator. He expressed his desire to go back on the

job of Driver Cat-V for which he expressed his readiness and willingness to accept wages of Driver Category

V. The management after considering his request, re-designated him as Driver Category V w.e.f. 11-4-94 and

his basic was fixed initially in the pay scale of 44.50-1.62-67.18 (NCWA-IV). His basic was fixed after re-

designation in post of Driver Category V as under:-

a. Shri Madhusudan Prasad Mishra was appointed as Driver Cat-V w.e.f. 15-6-84,

b. Promoted to the post of Dumper Operator Gr-II w.e.f. 20-2-87

c.

Promoted to the post of Dumper Operator Grade I w.e.f. 28-2-89

d. Basic pay drawn in the post of Dumper Operator Grade I

In NCWA IV

In NCWA V

1-3-92 Rs.66.19

1.3.92 Rs.98.95

1-3-93 Rs.68.81

1-3-93 Rs.103.50

1-3-94 Rs.71.43

1.3.94 Rs.108.05

A representation dated 26-8-97 by the Union in this respect on the ground that before re-designation

as Driver Cat-V. workman was getting basic pay of Rs.108.05 per day in the post of Dumper Operator Grade

I. This remuneration was deducted and Union was informed by the management vide letter dated 8-12-96.

Workman further file a case before the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate Singrauli but could not succeed.

It was decided that since workman was selected for the post of dumper operator to Driver and was again re-

designated as Driver hence his pay might be fixed for the post of Driver Cat-V as if he was not selected for

the post of Dumper Operator and he would get increment benefit of Driver Cat-V meaning thereby he was

appointed on 15-6-84 and his pay be fixed with awarding normal increment of Driver Cat V from 1-7-85 but

actual monetary benefit may be given with immediate effect and no arrear will be paid consequent upon the

new fitment. Also, it was decided that consequent upon placement in Cat-V, workman will not claim

promotion to the post of Driver Cat-VI cum Mechanic in case his juniors were promoted. This decision was

taken after prolonged discussion with the workman. Accordingly, the management prayed for rejection of his

claim.

5. In his rejoinder, the workman states that copy of application of workman dated 21-3-94 Annexure M-1 filed

by the employers shows that the workman only requested for change of place of duty and the employers did

not pass any order on his application on Annexure M-1. Workman filed another application dated 29-3-94,

copy filed by the management which he had filed at the instance & assurance of employers that his pay will

be protected and it is on that application filed by the workman on assurance by the management that his pay

would be protected, the employers passed order dated 11-4-94, copy filed by employers with their Written

Statement of defense. Workman reiterated allegations that employers passed order dated 7-6-99 protecting

his salary w.e.f. 11-4-94 but stated in the order that workman would not get the monetary benefits and no

arrear arise out of fixation. This order dated 7-6-99 is illegal and discriminatory because similarly placed

workman George Koshi, R.D.Patel, B.K.Singh, G.S.Pandey, working in other projects of the same employers

have been granted pay protection.

2728

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

6. Workman has examined himself on oath and has filed 3 photocopy documents which are office order dated

30-9-91, 18-2-89 & 9-1-99 relating to Kakri project. These orders relate to other workman R.D. Patel,

B.P.Dwivedi and George Koshi as stated by him in his rejoinder.

7. Management examined Sunil Kumar Jha, General Manager of the Amlohri Project on oath and proved

documents- application dated 21-3-94 & 29-3-94, office order dated 11-4-94, letter dated 8-12-97 of

management sent to Union which are Exhibit M- 1 to M-4 respectively.

8. Shri S.K. Mishra appeared on behalf of workman and Shri A.K.Shashi for employer. I have heard argument

of learned counsel from both the sides and have gone through the record.

9. On perusal of record in the light of rival argument, following points came up for determination in the present

case:-

(1) Whether the refusal of arrears regarding difference of pay/ wages during the period 11-4-94 to

7-6-99 by the management is justified in law and fact?

(2) Whether the workman is entitled to any arrear of difference of pay?

10. Point for Determination No.1-

Admitted between the parties is the fact that while workman was working as Dumper Operator Grade I, he

was reverted to Driver Cat-V on his application. Date of order of reversion is 11-4-94. According to the

workman, he filed an application on 21-3-94 requesting him to allot duty at another place because working as

dumper operator in sand and fumes is adversely affecting his health. This application has been proved by

management’s witness at Exhibit M-1. Perusal of this application reveals that following order was passed on

the application by management-

“Dy.CPM- please issue a letter to Shri M.P.Mishra (worker) that as dumper operator, he cannot get a place

out of mine area. If he will give option for demotion to the post of Driver Cat V, he can be posted in

dispensary or else where out of the mine.”

This document has been admitted by the workman also. The other application filed by workman on 29-3-94,

copy filed by management, admitted by workman, proved by management witness at Exhibit M-2 makes it

clear that in its 2nd application, workman expressed his willingness to change his post from dumper operator

to Driver and also expressed his consent and accepted hat he will accept whatever salary admissible to him as

per rules on his changed place. There is an order of the management side which reads as under:-

“ He should be engaged as Driver Cat-V and should also be paid wages of Driver Cat-V. he would be posted

in hospital – signed on 29th March”

Exhibit M-3 proved by management’s witness, admitted by the workman is the formal office order dated

11-4-94 passed by Dy.Chief Personal Officer on his application dated 29-3-94. This order reads as under:-

“Shri Madhusudhan Prasad Mishra Dumper Operator vide his application dated 29-3-94 has requested for

Driver job as he is suffering from asthma disease and unable to perform duty of Dumper Operator. His

request has been considered and he is hereby re-designated as Driver Cat-V w.e.f. 11-4-94 and his basic will

be fixed Rs.44.50-1.63-67.18. Shri Mishra is directed to report for duty to Medical Superintendent Amlohri.”

11. Workman has stated on oath that the application dated 29-3-94 was filed by him under the assurance by the

management that he will be adjusted out of field duty as a Driver on the same pay and wages he was getting

as Dumper Operator Grade I. Management side has denied this allegation in their written statement of

defense. Hence, the burden of proving the fact that workman filed application dated 29-3-94 on the

assurance given by management regarding protection of his salary and wages will be on the workman. There

is nothing on record except the self serving statement of workman on this point. the office order referred to

above passed on the application of workman and the endorsement of the Manager on the application of

workman M-3 & M-2 respectively, do not state that his pay shall be protected after changing his job from

Dumper Operator Grade I to Driver Cat-V. Moreover in Para-5 of the Written Statement of the claim,

workman has stated that vide order of management dated 7-6-99, his salary was protected on the basis of

representation and past services and he was fixed at Rs.104.90 per day. This pay is relating to post of dumper

operator Grade II. Hence, this allegation of workman where he admits that his salary was protected by order

of management dated 7-6-99 shows that his grievances were redressed. As regards, payment of arrears of

salary for the period between 11-4-94 to 7-6-99, there is no such order regarding payment. The point arises

here is whether management was under obligation to pay arrears or not. No rule or cercular has been cited by

workman which provides the management to pay arrears of pay and wages in such a situation. It is further the

case of workman in his rejoinder that similarly placed other workers viz George Koshi, R.D.Patel, B.K.Singh

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2729

and Shri G.S.Pandey were granted arrears when their cadre was changed. The management has first denied

it.

12. Learned counsel for management has submitted that these workmen are not the employees of Amlohri

Project rather they are employees of Kakri and other projects under different managements hence any order

of the management of other project will not be binding on present employers. Learned counsel for workman

has rebutted this argument with submission that all projects are owned and managed by NCL hence simply

because the projects are different, no discrimination can be done in similar circumstances as it has been done

in the case in hand which requires to be rectified.

13. Point further arises that whether workman has successfully proved this fact in the case in hand or not. Perusal

of record reveals that application was filed by workman directing the management to produce the service

records of R.D.Patel, B.K.Singh and George Koshi. The management opposed this application stating that

their service records are not with them because these workers are employees of different projects and their

service records are maintained in the office of that project. This application for summoning document was

dismissed by my learned predecessor that the management in the case in hand cannot be directed to produce

these service records because the records were not in their possession and control. Workman could file an

application for summoning the records from the offices where they were maintained but he did not do so

hence a simple self serving statement of workman that in similar cases of cadre change, arrears of difference

in salary were given to Shri B.K.Singh, George Koshi and R.D.Patel, which is not supported by any

document is not sufficient to prove this assertion of workman. Moreover, there is on record photocopy of

office order dated 30-9-91, 18-2-89 & 9-1-99 which is inadmissible because it has not been proved. These 3

documents are office orders subsequent upon change of cadre of employees R.D.Patel, B.K.Singh and

George Koshi Even in these inadmissible documents,there is no order regarding payment of arrears of

difference of wages rather it has been specifically denied to them. Hence, in such a circumstance, and in the

light of facts and evidence as mentioned above, there is nothing on record to hold that management was not

justified in refusing arrears of difference of pay to the workman for the period 11-4-94 to 7-6-99.

Accordingly it is held that refusal of management to pay arrear of pay to the workman subsequent to

his change of cadre from post of dumper operator Grade I to Driver Cat-V is not unjustified in law or

fact. Point No.1 is answered accordingly.

14. Point for Determination No.2-

In the light of my finding in Point No.1, this point is answered in negative holding that the workman is not

entitled to any relief.

15. In the result, award is passed as under:-

(1) The action of the management in not paying arrear of pay to the workman subsequent to his

change of cadre from post of Dumper Operator Grade I to Driver Cat-V is proper and legal.

(2) Workman Shri Madhusudan Prasad Mishra is not entitled to any relief.

16. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labor & Employment as per

rules.

Dated: 5-4-2019

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 669-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

esllZ lSUVªy cSad vkWQ bafM;k ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 92@2013½ dks izdkf'kr

djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26-04-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12012@62@2013&vkbZvkj ¼ch-II½]

lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

2730

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 669.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 92/2013) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Central Bank of

India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 26.04.2019.

[No. L-12012/62/2013-IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/92/2013

Shri Vinod Kumar Srivas,

Ward No.4, Maa Baba Chowk,

Bahmni Banjer, Mandla (MP)

…Workman

Versus

Sr. Regional Manager,

Central Bank of India,

601, Napier Town,

Jabalpur (MP)

…Management

AWARD

Passed on this 3rd day of April, 2019

1. As per letter dated 30-9-2013 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labor, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-

12012/62/2013-IR(B-II). The dispute under reference relates to:

“Whether the action of the management of the Central Bank of India in terminating the services of

Shri Vinod Kumar Srivas is legal and justified? What relief the claimant is entitled for and from which

date?”

2. In his statement of claim, the applicant workman has stated that he was appointed/ entered in the service of

the employer Bank in Bahmni Banjer Branch on 6-4-2002 as peon cum safai worker and worked till 12-2-

2013 without any break in service. At the time of his termination, he was paid fixed wages @ Rs.1850 per

month. He discharged his duties faithfully and diligently like any permanent employee, worked even on

holidays and had completed more than 240 days in each calendar year for about 11 years continuously. He

was initially paid Rs.740 per month which was raised up to Rs.1850 per month during the course of his

employment. The post on which the workman was working was regular in nature. Vacancies for the post

were advertised. Workman also submitted his application, to be forwarded to Regional Office of the

employer Bank but it was not sent in time due to malafide on the part of employers depriving him an

opportunity to appear in the selection process for the vacancies. He agitated against this and the Branch

Manager of the employer Bank terminated his services verbally from 12-2-2013. He had worked 240 days in

the year preceding the date of his termination. No notice or salary was given to him hence the termination is

violative of Section 25-F of ID Act, is also violative of principles of natural justice hence amounting to

illegal retrenchment, victimization and unfair labor practice. It was also alleged that after his termination,

workman has been out of gainful employment and has been unable to get job anywhere. His family is living

in starvation because he is the only earning member of the family. Accordingly, the workman has prayed for

declaring illegal and setting aside his termination and direction to employers to reinstate him with full

backwages.

3. In their Written Statement of defense, employers have flatly denied the allegation that the workman was ever

employed by them in any capacity. It was also pleaded that he was neither engaged as a daily wager or part

time worker of the Bank. He was not an employee of the Bank. Bank never directed him to work in any

Branch of the Bank. There is no relationship of workman and employer between the parties hence there is no

question of his completing 240 days in employment/ engagement of the employer Bank preceding the date of

his termination. Also, it was pleaded that the Bank issued publication on 2-11-2012 in newspaper regarding

vacancies of Safaikarmchari and peon but the application of the workman could not reach to its Regional

Office in time hence he was not considered. There has been no violation of Section 25-F or any provision of

ID Act. Accordingly, it has been prayed that the claim of the workman be dismissed as such.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2731

4. In evidence, workman filed peon book (7 pages), payment vouchers (4 pages), written application to

Regional office of the Bank regarding his application w.r.t. vacancies ( 1 page), certificate issued by Branch

Manager alongwith the application (1 page each). Letter of Branch Manager dated 28-11-2011(2 pages), all

admitted by employers marked Exhibit W-1 to W-6 respectively. Workman also filed copy of

communication dated 23-2-2013 issued by Bank to him stating the reasons of non-consideration of his

application. In the recruitment process with regard to vacancies advertised which is also admitted by

employers is Exhibit W-7. Workman examined himself on oath and was cross-examination by employers.

5. The management examined its witness Shri Sumil Goel, Branch Manager on oath, who was cross-examined

by workman. The management also filed payment vouchers, 8 in number, attendance sheet (14 pages), peon

book ( 64 pages). All admitted by workman except attendance sheet marked Exhibit M-1 & M-2

respectively.

6. I have heard argument of Shri Arun Patel, learned counsel for workman and Shri Avinash Dey, Learned

counsel for management and have also gone through the record.

7. From the perusal of record in the light of rival argument, following points for determination arise in the case

in hand-

(1) Whether the termination/dis-engagement of services of workman is justified in law?

(2) If the answer of Ist point is in Negative, whether the workman is entitled to any relief?

8. Point for Determination No.1-

Respective pleadings of the parties on this point have already been detailed earlier. Workman has examined

himself on oath. In his affidavit, he has stated that he was engaged as pen from safai worker on 6-4-2002 &

since then, has been continuously working upto 12-2-13 at Bahmni Banjer Branch of the employer Bank. He

was paid wages regularly through payment vouchers, some of the vouchers have been filed by him. He

further stated that he was assigned work daily including Dak distribution to the Bank’s customers. Copy of

the peon book has been filed by him. He also states that his services were terminated without giving notice or

without assigning any reason from 13-2-2013 by a verbal order which is against law and since then he is not

gainfully employed any where. He has denied that he was called for work only when the Bank required his

services and has stated in his cross-examination that he was regularly kept in engagement and had worked

for 240 days in the year preceding his dis-engagement. Workman has filed and proved peon book (copy)

which is in 7 pages, admitted by employer. It goes to show that he has distributed various mails to various

people/ persons within a period from 5-3-2002 to 16-3-2007 on different dates. Payment vouchers (copy)

total 4 pages, filed by workman admitted by the employers which is Exhibit W-2 goes to show that he has

been paid wages during the period of 7-1-2003 to 1-8-2007 at different dates as casual worker with the Bank.

Workman has further filed and proved an application and certificate dated 7-11-2012, issue by the Bank

certifying that he worked for more than 45 days in the year 2002-03. Employers have admitted these two

documents. This certificate was issued by employers in relation to an application (copy on record), about

which the workman has stated that he had submitted application regarding recruitment w.r.t. vacancies

advertised,which was not forwarded by the Branch to the Regional office. Management’s witness Sumit

Goel, Branch Manager has stated on oath that workman was never an employee of the Bank nor was he

appointed by any officer of the Bank. His averment that he was peon cum safai worker at Bahmni Banjer

Branch from 6-4-2002 to 12-2-2013 is baseless because he was not appointed in the Bank nor was engaged

as daily wager or part time worker with the Branch. It was also stated that since he was not in engagement of

the management Bank therefore he was not directed at any point of time to discharge any duty and there was

no question of completing 240 days in the year preceding his date of alleged dis-engagement hence benefit

of Section 25-F is not available to him regarding not forwarding his application for recruitment regarding

vacancies in the year 2012, the witness states that his candidature was not considered because his application

was not received by the Regional office of the Bank before the last date fixed for filing applications. Also, it

was stated by the witness that since there was no relation of employer and employee, at any point of time

between parties, the provisions of I.D. Act, 1947 are not applicable in the case at hand.

9. In his cross-examination, management witness has stated that the documents (referred to above) filed by the

workman have been admitted by management employers. This witness also admits that no notice or

compensation was given to him before his disengagement. It is strange that the document filed by

management itself rebut the oral statement of management’s witness Exhibit M-1 which is of 8 pages is the

payment voucher regarding payment made to the workman by the Bank. These vouchers are of date 3-1-

2012, 2-3-12, 18-4-12, 1-5-12, 2-6-12, 3-7-12, 4-9-12, 6-10-12. It is specifically mentioned in these vouchers

that these are wages of daily wager workman Vinod Kumar Srivas. Learned counsel for employment submits

that even if it be taken that the workman was paid through these vouchers because he worked with the

2732

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Branch or was engaged with the Branch, these vouchers donot prove him in engagement for 240 days in the

year preceding his date of alleged disengagement. Payment voucher of March 12 establishes that workman

had worked in February 2012 for which payment was made in March and same is the case with other

vouchers. Hence, these 7 payment vouchers establish the case of the workman that he was engaged for 7

months i.e. for 210 days with the Bank. Regarding his engagement for other period, management has itself

filed peon book which is 64 pages marked Exhibit M-2. The peon book(copy) Exhibit M-2- page 27,28 & 29

as well as 30 show that the workman has distributed different mails in the month of May. Similarly peon

book Exhibit M-2 Page 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 & 41 also establish that he has distributed various mails on

different dates to different persons on behalf of Bank.

10. Learned counsel for management has tried to discredit these documents, though filed by the management

itself, with a ground that these documents donot contain full signature of the workman in the column of the

person who has delivered the mail but I am not inclined to accept these argument because in every document

right from statement of claim to statement of oath on other documents, the initials of the workman are same

hence these M-2 document further establish that workman has also worked in the month of May and July for

which, particularly for the month of July, the payment vouchers has been with held by the management.

accordingly the evidence produced by the workman regarding his claim that he completed 240 days

preceding date of his termination appears more reliable than the barred statement of management’s witness,

contradicted by the documents produced by the management itself, that workman was never in engagement at

any time with the Bank. On the basis of above discussion, the fact that workman had completed 240 days in

the year preceding his date of disengagement is held proved. Also the fact that workman has been

engagement of the management Bank since April 2002 as casual worker on whole time basis, discharging the

duties of mail messenger and other duties till date of his disengagement is also held proved.

11. Reference of Section 25-F of ID Act is also necessary which reads as under:-

Section 25-F: Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen.- No workman employed in any industry

who has been in continuous service for not less than one year under an employer shall be retrenched by that

employer until-

(a) the workman has been given one month's notice in writing indicating the reasons for retrenchment and the

period of notice has expired, or the workman has been paid in lieu of such notice, wages for the period of the

notice: 1[***]

(b) the workman has been paid, at the time of retrenchment, compensation which shall be equivalent to

fifteen days' average pay 2[for every completed year of continuous service] or any part thereof in excess of

six months; and

(c) notice in the prescribed manner is served on the appropriate Government 3[or such authority as may be

specified by the appropriate Government by notification in the Official Gazette.”

12. Learned counsel for workman referred to case of Director, Fisheries Terminal Division versus Bhikubhai

Meghajibhai Chavda reported in AIR-2010 SSC-1236. Para-14 & 15 of this judgment requires to be

mentioned here which are being reproduced as under:-

This court in the case of R.M. Yellatty vs. Assistant Executive Engineer [(2006) 1 SCC 106], has observed

“However, applying general principles and on reading the aforesaid judgments, we find that this Court, has

repeatedly taken the view that the burden of proof is on the claimant to show that he had worked for 240 days

in a given year. This burden is discharged only upon the workman stepping up in the witness box. This

burden is discharged upon the workman adducing cogent 9 evidence, both oral and documentary. In cases of

termination of services of daily-waged earners, there will be no letter of appointment of termination. There

will also be no receipt of proof of payment. Thus in most cases, the workman (the claimant) can only call

upon the employer to produce before the Court the nominal muster roll for the given period, the letter of

appointment of termination, if any, the wage register, the attendance register, etc. Drawing of adverse

inference ultimately would depend thereafter on the facts of each case.”

15) Applying the principles laid down in the above case by this court, the evidence produced by the

appellants has not been consistent. The appellants claim that the respondent did not work for 240 days. The

respondent was a workman hired on a daily wage basis. So, it is obvious, as this court pointed out in the

above case that he would have difficulty in having access to all the official documents, muster rolls etc. in

connection with his service. He has come forward and deposed, so in our opinion the burden of proof shifts

to the employer/appellants to prove that he did not complete 240 days of service in the requisite period to

constitute continuous service. It is the contention of the appellant that the services of the respondent were

terminated in 1988. The witness produced by the appellant stated that the respondent stopped coming to work

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2733

from 10 February, 1988. The documentary evidence produced by the appellant is contradictory to this fact as

it shows that the respondent was working during February, 1989 also. It has also been observed by the High

Court that the muster roll for 1986-87 was not completely produced. The appellants have inexplicably failed

to produce the complete records and muster rolls from 1985 to 1991, inspite of the direction issued by the

labor court to produce the same. In fact, there has been practically no challenge to the deposition of the

respondent during cross-examination. In this regard, it would be pertinent to mention the observation of three

judge bench of this court in the case of Municipal Corporation, Faridabad Vs. Siri Niwas [(2004) 8 SCC

195], where it is observed: “A Court of Law even in a case where provisions of the Indian Evidence Act

apply, may presume or may not presume that if a party despite possession of the best evidence had not

produced the same, it would have gone against this contentions. The matter, however, would be different

where despite direction by a court the evidence is withheld.

On the basis of above discussion, it is held that dis-engagement of services of workman Vinod Kumar

Srivas from 12-2-2013 is violative of Section 25-F of ID Act and is untenable in law. Point No.1 is

answered accordingly.

13. Point for determination No.2-

In the light of finding w.r.t. Point No.1, point remains for determination is to what relief, the workman is

entitled? Learned counsel for workman has relied on case law Tapas Kumar Paul versus BSNL and

another reported in 2014(4)-SCR-875 and has submitted that since the retrenchment of the workman has

not been found legal, hence he requires to be reinstated as prayed by him in the facts and circumstances of

the case at hand. The Apex Court has laid down certain guidelines to be considered in substituting an order of

reinstatement by awarding compensation. These are -

“It is no doubt true that a Court may pass an order substituting an order of reinstatement by awarding

compensation but the same has to be based on justifiable grounds viz.

(I)

where the industry is closed;

(II)

where the employee has superannuated or going to retire shortly and no period of service is left to

his credit;

(III)

where the workman has been rendered incapacitated to discharge the duties and cannot be

reinstated and / or

(IV)

when he has lost confidence of the Management to discharge duties. What is sought to be

emphasized is that there may be appropriate case on facts which may justify substituting the order

of reinstatement by award of compensation, but that has to be supported by some legal and

justifiable reasons indicating why the order of reinstatement should be allowed to be substituted by

award of compensation.

The same principles have been laid down in case of Deepali Gundu Surwase versus Kranti Junior

AdhyapakMahavidyalaya and others reported in 2013(1) SCC-324.

14.

In recent case, Civil Appeal no. 124-125 of 2019 decided by Apex Court on 7-1-2019 also

requires to be mentioned in this respect. Para-11 of said judgment is being reproduced as under:-

It is apposite to reproduce what this Court has held in the case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (supra):

“33. It is clear from the reading of the aforesaid judgments that the ordinary principle of grant of

reinstatement with fullback wages, when the termination is found to be illegal is not applied mechanically in

allcases. While that may be a position whereservices of a regular/permanent workman areterminated illegally

and/or mala fide and/or by way of victimization, unfair labor practice, etc. However, when it comes to the

case of termination of a dailywage worker and where the termination is found illegal because of a procedural

defect, namely, in violation of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, this Court is consistent in taking

the view that in such cases reinstatement with back wages is not automatic and instead the workman should

be given monetary compensation which will meet the ends of justice. Rationale for shifting in this direction

is obvious.

34. The reasons for denying the relief ofreinstatement in such cases are obvious. It istrite law that when the

termination is foundto be illegal because of non-payment of retrenchment compensation and notice pay as mandatorily

required under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, even after reinstatement, it is always open to the

management to terminate the services ofthat employee by paying him the retrenchment compensation. Since such a

workman was working on daily wage basis and even after he is reinstated, he has noright to seek regularisation [see

State of Karnataka v. Umadevi (3)17]. Thus when he cannot claim regularisation and he has noright to continue even

2734

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

as a daily wage worker, no useful purpose is going to beserved in reinstating such a workman and hecan be given

monetary compensation by theCourt itself inasmuch as if he is terminatedagain after reinstatement, he would receive

monetary compensation only in the form ofretrenchment compensation and notice pay.

In such a situation, giving the relief ofreinstatement, that too after a long gap, would not serve any purpose.

“35. We would, however, like to add a caveathere. There may be cases where terminationof a daily wage

worker is found to be illegalon the ground that it was resorted to asunfair labor practice or in

violation

of the principle of last come first go viz. whileretrenching such a worker daily wage juniorsto him were

retained. There may also be asituation that persons junior to him wereregularised under some policy but

theworkman concerned terminated. In suchcircumstances, the terminated worker shouldnot be denied

reinstatement unless there aresome other weighty reasons

for

adopting

thecourse

of

grant

of

compensation instead ofreinstatement. In such cases, reinstatementshould be the rule and only in

exceptionalcases for the reasons stated to be in writing,such a relief can be denied.”

Now considering the claim of reinstatement of the workman in the light of principles of law laid down in the

referred cases from the evidence on record, it is proved that the workman has been in engagement of the

management Bank since April 2002. He has specifically stated on oath that he has not been in gainful

engagement since after the date of his disengagement and there is no rebuttal by employers. This is

established that he has passed the period of his life in which he could be eligible or could apply for any other

employment as he has crossed that age during his this engagement also that he has not reached the age of

superannuation or has not been incapacitated by any intervening disability to continue in engagement. In

these circumstances, it is just and proper and in the ends of justice if he is reinstated on the position as it was

on the date of his disengagement but with 50 % backwages from the date of his disengagement till date of

reinstatement.Accordingly, the workman is held entitled to be reinstated on the position as it was on the

date of his disengagement but with 50 % back wages and all consequential benefits from the date of his

disengagement till date of reinstatement.

Point No.2 is decided accordingly.

In the result, award is passed as under:-

(1) The action of the management of the Central Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri

Vinod Kumar Srivas is not legal and justified.

(2) The management of Central Bank of India is directed to reinstate workman Vinod Kumar Srivas

on the position as it was on the date of his disengagement but with 50 % backwages from the date

of his disengagementwith all consequential benefits till date of reinstatement.

Amount as per above order shall be paid to workman within 30 days from the date of notification of award.

In case of default, amount shall carry 9% interest per annum from the date of award till its realization.

Dated : 3-4-2019

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 670-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

esllZ cSad vkWQ cMkSnk ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn

esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] u- 1] ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 94@2014½ dks izdkf'kr

djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26@04@-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&39025@01@2019&vkbZvkj ¼ch-II½]

lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2735

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 670.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 94/2014) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, No. 1, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Bank of

Baroda and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 26/04/2019.

[No. L-39025/01/2019-IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE COURT OF SHRI AVTAR CHAND DOGRA PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL

GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT No.1, DWARKA COURTS

COMPLEX : NEW DELHI

ID No. 94/2014

Smt. Kamla Devi w/o. Shri Makhan Lal

Through Delhi Karamchari Union (Regd.)

52-C, Okha Estate Phase-3,

New Delhi 110020.

r/o. 8/3 G-Block, Sangam Vihar,

New Delhi 110062.

…Workman/Claimant

Versus

The Branch Manager

Bank of Baroda,

L-43, Kalkaji,

New Delhi 110019.

…Management

AWARD

This Award shall decided a claim petition directly filed by the claimant under Section 2-A of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (in short “the Act”) with the averments that the claimant Smt. Kamla Devi had been working as

Safai Karamchari since January, 2011 with Management Bank at its Kalkajit Branch and her drawn wages were

Rs.6000/- per month. She always worked with honesty and dedication but the Management took advantage of her

illiteracy. She was neither given any appointment letter, nor minimum wages and over time, casual leave etc., though

the claimant made demand for the same. The Management terminated the services of the claimant on 3/10/2013

without any notice, warning or charge sheet and in violation of the provisions of Section 25-F and 25-G of the Act. It

is pleaded that the Management used to get signatures of the claimant on blank vouchers and plain papers which the

claimant had done under pressure as the Management used to extend threat of terminating her services time and again.

The Management even did not pay to her earned wages for the months of August, September and October, 2013. A

demand notice dated 7/10/2013 was sent to the Management but to no response. The claimant thereafter approached

the Conciliation Officer but to no avail . The workman/claimant is unemployed since the day of termination of her

services by the Management, though she made efforts to find a job.

2.

The claim petition has been resisted by the Management who filed its written statement and took preliminary

objections inter-alia that there is no employer-employee relationship between the claimant and the Management, as

the claimant never worked with the Management since its opening in the year 2012. It is alleged that claim of the

claimant to the effect that she started working at Kalkaji Branch of the Bank since January, 2011, is false inasmuch as

Kalkaji Branch of the Bank was opened (soft launch) only on 31/3/2012 and was formally inaugurated only on

22/9/2012, because premises on Ground Floor, L-43 Kalkaji was taken on lease w.e.f. 1/4/2012 and permission was

obtained from South MCD vide letter dated 8/8/2012. All other averments made by the claimant regarding obtaining

her signatures on blank vouchers/papers and/or payment of less wages have been totally denied by the Management.

3)

The claimant/workman filed rejoinder wherein she denied all the allegations made by the Management and

reiterated her own case as set up in the claim petition.

4)

On the pleadings of the parties, this Tribunal vide order dated 28/04/2016 framed following issues :-

(i) Whether termination of the workman with effect from 3/10/2013 is arbitrary and illegal and the workman

is liable to be reinstated as alleged ?

(ii) Whether Kalkaji branch of the Management was opened on 31/3/2012 ? If so, its effect ?

2736

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(iii) Whether the workman has never worked in Kalkaji Branch, as alleged and as such there was no

relationship of employer-employee between the parties ?

6) The Claimant in support of her case examined herself as W.W.1 and tendered her affidavit Ex.WW1/A

alongwith documents Ex.WW1/1 to WW1/3.

7)

On the other hand, the Management in order to rebut the case of the claimant examined Shri Aditya Ravi,

Chief Manager of Management who tendered his evidence by way of affidavit Ex.MW1/A and relied on documents

Ex.MW1/1 to Ex.MW1/3.

8)

I have carefully gone through the evidence adduced on record by both the parties and have give my

thoughtful consideration to rival contentions of Shri B.S.Rawat, A./R for the claimant and Shri B.S.Chauhan, A/R for

the Management. My findings on above issues are as follows.

Issue No.2 :-

9.

Onus to prove this issue was upon the Management, inasmuch as it was alleged by the Management that

claim of the claimant that she had started working with the Management Bank from January, 2011 is incorrect because

Kalkaji Branch of the Bank was opened (soft launch) only on 31/3/2012 and was formally inaugurated only on

22/9/2012, because premises on Ground Floor, L-43 Kalkaji was taken on lease w.e.f. 1/4/2012 and permission was

obtained from South MCD vide letter dated 8/8/2012. To prove its case, the Management examined MW1- Mr.Aditya

Ravi who has filed on record copy of the lease deed in respect of premises where Kalkaji Branch was opened viz.

ground floor of L-43 Kalkaji New Delhi as Ex.MW1/1, which goes to show that premises in question was leased to

the Management Bank w.e.f.1/4/2012 for a term of 10 years. MW 2 Ankit Palta, another witness of the Management

has filed on record copy of the letter dated 15/3/2012 of Reserve Bank of India as Ex.MW2/3 which shows that MICR

code in respect of Kalkaji Branch was allotted to the Management Bank by the Reserve Bank of India. No contrary

thereto has been adduced by the claimant. The aforesaid documents substantiate the plea of the Management that

Kalkji Branch was opened (soft lunched) on 31/3/2012. Consequently, the plea of the claimant that she had started

working with the Management from January, 2011 is not acceptable. This issue is decided accordingly in favour of

the Management.

Issue No. 3 :-

10.

Ld. A/R appearing on behalf of the Management strongly contended that there is no relationship of employer

and employee between the Management & claimant as she never worked with the Management what to talk from

January,2011. It was also contended that onus is also upon the claimant to prove that she was in the employment of

the Management Bank and has completed more than 240 days in a calendar year.

10)

Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Claimant submitted during the course of arguments

that the claimant was working as Part Time Sweeper with the Management Bank since 2012 though claimant due to

illiteracy and ignorance of exact date, averred in the claim petition that she was engaged in January, 2011. It was also

submitted that services of the claimant were illegally terminated on 3/10/2013.

12-

There is no dispute about preposition of law that onus to prove that claimant was in the employment of

Management is always on the workman/claimant and it is for the workman to adduce evidence to prove factum of her

employment with the Management Bank. Such evidence may be in form of receipt of salary or wages for 240 days or

record of his/her appointment or engagement for that year to show that he/she has worked with the employer for 240

days or more in a Calendar year. In this regard, reference may be made to Batala Coop. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs.

Sowaran Singh, (2005) 8 Supreme Court Cases 481 as well as Director Fisheries Terminated Division Vs. Bhikubhai

Meghajibhai Gavda (2012) 1 SCC 47.

12-

This Tribunal has to consider the oral as well as documentary evidence adduced on record so as to decide the

question of relationship of employer and employee between the Management and the claimant herein. In this respect,

it is appropriate to refer to the affidavit ExWW1/A of the claimant. It is clear from the perusal of the affidavit

Ex.WW1/A that it is in consonance with the pleadings i.e. statement of claim filed by the claimant. It is the specific

case of the Management that the claimant never worked with the Management at any point of time. MW1 Aditya

Ravi clarified in his cross examination that he had taken charge of the post of Branch Manager of Kalkaji Branch

(which was a new branch) on 1st May, 2012 and at that time there was no official/Safai Karamchari at the said branch.

He volunteered that cleaning (of bank premises) was taken care of by the landlord. Thereafter Shri Neeru was posted

by the competent authority to clean the branch. He admitted that he has not filed on record any document to show that

Shri Neeru was engaged as sub-staff (for cleaning the bank premises). He also admitted that vouchers Ex.MW1/W-1

to Ex.MW1/W-19 bear his signatures and tried to explain that payment shown in those vouchers are with respect to

cleaning of fans, computers, Air conditioners, telephones, FAX machines including sweeping etc., However, a careful

perusal of these vouchers (Ex.MW1/W-1 to Ex.MW1/W-9) shows that these have been drawn for “sundry charges”

regarding payment made towards sweeping of the bank premises. First voucher Ex.MW1/W-1 (dated 30/6/2012) is

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2737

towards payment of Rs.1600/- made to Kamla; second voucher Ex.MW1/W-2 (dated 1/8/2012) is towards payment of

Rs.1600/- made to Kamlesh; third voucher Ex.MW1/W-2 (dated 1/9/2012) is towards payment of Rs.1600/- made to

Maya; Similarly are the other vouchers showing payment of sweeping charges made to different persons named as

Sarabjit, Manju Devi, Geeta Devi, Kamni, Anita, Gaya Lal, Mohan, Jai Kishan, Gopal, Jogi, Raju, Mr. Mohan,

Geeta, Raju, Jogi, Raju and last voucher dated 17/12/13 for Rs.900/- is in the name of Gopi. The plea of the

Management that the claimant never worked with it any any point of time is belied from the document/payment

voucher Ex.MW1/W-1 which payment has been made in favour of the claimant Smt.Kamla. It is common

knowledge that the payment through vouchers is made by the Banks to the workers engaged on part time basis

including Part Time Sweeper for sweeping and dusting the bank premises and further that, the Branch Manager

concerned has been given powers to engage such workers.

13-

It is a matter of record that an application under Section 11(3)(b) of the Act filed on behalf of the claimant

was partly allowed by this Tribunal and Management Bank was directed to produce certain documents vis-à-vis Name

of the Safai Karamchari/Chowkidar alongwith wage slip, mode of payment etc. The Management failed to produce

the said documents excepting the payment vouchers and as such, adverse inference is required to be drawn against the

Management for non production of such documents. It is very astonishing that payment towards sweeping charges has

been debited by the Management Bank through monthly vouchers but in different names. The Management Bank has

neither explained as to why vouchers have been issued in different names, nor has filed details of such Part Time

Sweepers engaged by it. It appears that same has been done just to deprive the claimant to seek other facilities. In

the circumstances, I find force in the submission of the claimant that she always worked with honesty and dedication

but the Management took advantage of her illiteracy and did not issue her any appointment letter. I am of the opinion

that the there existed relationship of employer-employee between the Management and claimant herein and that the

claimant worked with the Management at least w.e.f. 30/6/2012 till 30/9/2013 and that her services were terminated

by the Management on 3/10/2013. Consequently, this Tribunal has no hesitation to hold that the claimant is a

“workman” within the definition of Section 2(S) of the Act even if she was engaged on part time basis. In this regard,

reference can be made to the decision in the case of Devinder Singh Vs. Municipal Council, Sanaur, AIR 2011

Supreme Court 2532, wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court while interpreting the provisions of Section 2(S) of the Act

which deals with the definition of “workman” has observed as under :-

“The source of employment, the quantum of recruitment, the terms & conditions of employment/ contract of

service, the quantum of wages/ pay and mode of payment are not at all relevant for deciding whether or not a

person is a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Act. The definition of workman also does not

make any distinction between full time and part time employee or a person appointed on contract basis.

There is nothing in the plain language of Section 2(s) from which it can be inferred that only person

employed on regular basis or a person employed for doing whole time job is a workman and the one

employed on temporary, part time or contract basis on fixed wages or as a casual employee or for doing duty

for fixed hours is not a workman.

It is clear from the perusal of aforesaid observations that even if a person is engaged on temporary, part time or

contract basis or for doing any other kind of work and is duly paid wages for the said work, in that eventuality such a

person would be covered by the definition of “workman” as provided in Section 2(S) of the Act.

14.

Having regard to the overall facts and circumstances of the case, it is held that there existed relationship of

employer-employee between the Management and claimant herein. This issue is accordingly decided in favour of the

claimant and against the Management.

Issue No.1 :-

15-

The vital question for consideration is as to whether termination of the claimant is illegal and against the

provisions of the Act. Testimony of the claimant that the Management terminated her services on 3/10/2013 without

any notice, warning or charge sheet and in violation of the provisions of Section 25-F and 25-G of the Act, has gone

unassailed and unchallenged, inasmuch as the case of the Management was that the claimant was never

employed/engaged by it. However, this Tribunal while deciding issue No.3 has already held that there existed

relationship of employer-employee between the Management and the claimant and further that, claimant worked with

the Management at least w.e.f. 30/6/2012 till the date of her termination on 3/10/2013. Admittedly, the Management

bank has not issued any notice to the claimant before ordering her termination, nor has paid one month’s salary in lieu

of such notice as required under Section 25-F of the Act. I may mention that provisions of Section 25-F of the Act

which provides for conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen, are absolute and inexorable and it reads

as under :-

“25-F : Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen –

No workman employed in any industry who has been in continuous service for not less than one year under

an employer shall be retrenched by that employer until –

2738

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(a) The workman has been given one month’s notice in writing indicating the reasons for retrenchment and

the period of notice has expired, or the workman has been paid in lieu of such notice, wages for the

period of the notice;

(b) The workman has been paid, at the time of retrenchment, compensation which shall be equivalent to

fifteen days’ average pay for every completed years of continuous service or any part thereof in excess

of six months; and

(c) Notice in the prescribed manner is served on the appropriate Government or such authority as may be

specified by the appropriate Government by notification in the Official Gazette.”

The above provision makes it clear that the employer is required to give notice to the appropriate

Government apart-from giving one month’s notice in writing or one month’s wages in lieu of the notice and payment

of retrenchment compensation to the concerned workman.

There is long line of decisions of Hon’ble Apex Court as well as of various High Courts that provisions of Section 25-

F of the Act are mandatory in nature and termination of the workman from services in derogation of the provisions of

Section 25-F of the Act will render whole action of the Management Bank to be illegal and wrong under the law. As

such, it is held that action of the Management in terminating/disengaging the services of the claimant herein was

unjustified and illegal.

16)

Now the residual question arises for consideration is whether the claimant/work is entitled to any incidental

relief of payment of back wages and/or reinstatement of service with full back wages. There is pleading in the claim

petition as well as evidence to the effect that the workman is unemployed since the day of her termination and has got

no source of her livelihood.. The Management has not adduced any evidence to show that the claimant is gainfully

employed somewhere else or that she is in a position to make her both ends meet by doing any work. Even if it is

assumed that the claimant is doing some intermittent or ad-hoc work to make her both ends meet, that would not itself

amount to gainful employment. But at the same time this Tribunal can not ignore the fact that there is no positive

evidence on record to prove that the claimant was regular employee of the Management bank or that she had applied

for the post pursuant to the advertisement issued by the Bank or that her name was sponsored by the Employment

Exchange. Latest trend itself discernable from the various pronouncements made by the Hon’ble Apex Court is that

when a person has been engaged on daily wage basis or for doing temporary kinds of work, in that situation full back

wages are not be awarded. There are number of factors which are required to be considered by the Tribunal while

considering the question of reinstatement with back wages. It has been held in the case of Hari Nandan Prasad Vs.

Food Corporation of India (2014) 7 Supreme Court cases 190 as under :-

“ Relief by way of reinstatement with back wages is not automatic and may be wholly inappropriate

in a given fact situation even though the termination of an employee is in contravention of the

prescribed procedure. Compensation instead of reinstatement has been held to meet the ends of

justice. An order of retrenchment passed in violation of Section 25-F although may be set aside but

an award of reinstatement should not, however, automatically passed. The award of reinstatement

with full back wages in a case where the workman has completed 240 days of work in a year

preceding the date of termination, particularly daily wages has not been found to be proper by the

Supreme Court and instead compensation has been awarded. The Supreme Court has distinguished

between a daily wager who does not hold a post and a permanent employee. The reasons for

denying the relief of reinstatement in such cases are obvious. It is trite law that when the

termination is found to be illegal, because of non payment of retrenchment compensation and notice

pay as mandatorily required under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, even after

reinstatement, it is always open to the management to terminate the services of that employee by

paying him the retrenchment compensation.

17) Having regard to the recent judicial trends and duration of service rendered by the claimant, an amount of Rs.1

lakh (Rupees One Lakh) appears to be just and reasonable, and the same is payable to the claimant herein by the

Management. In case this compensation amount is not paid within one month from the date of publication of this

Award, then the claimant will be entitled to recover the same alongwith interest @ 6% per annum from the date of

filing the claim petition till realization of the amount.

Award is passed accordingly.

Date : 2/4/2019

AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, Presiding Officer

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2739

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 671-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ

eSlwj feujYl fyfeVsM izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] csaxywj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 96@2007½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj

dks 23@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&29012@22@2007&vkbZvkj¼,e½]

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 671 .—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 96/2007) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Bangalore now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Mysre Minerals

Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 23.4.2019.

[No. L-29012/22/2007-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIUBNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

BANGALORE

DATED : 10TH APRIL 2019

PRESENT : Justice Smt. Rathnakala, Presiding Officer

C.R No. 96/2007

Advocate for I Party : Advocate for II Party:

Mr. K.T. Govinde Gowda Mr. L. Venkatarama Reddy

AWARD

The Central Government vide Order No.L-29012/22/2007-IR(M) dated 21.08.2007 in exercise of the powers

conferred by Clause (d) of Sub-Section (1) and Sub-Section2(A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute act, 1947 (for

brevity ‘the Act’ hereafter) referred the following Industrial Dispute for adjudication.

“Whether the management of Mysore Minerals Limited is justified in terminating the services/

premature superannuating of the services of Smt. Shirumaniyamma w.e.f. 28.06.1998? If not, to what

relief the workman is entitled to?”

1.

The claim brought before this Tribunal by the 1st party is :—

She joined the service of the 2nd Party Management on 12.08.19977 at its Mining Unit viz., Byrapura Chromite Mines,

Channarayapatna Taluk, Hassan District, as a Mining Worker under token No. 203. At the time of joining service she

furnished her age as 30 years, her Date of Birth being 12.08.1947 as per the Horoscope, her age was accepted without

Certificate of Registration of Birth, in all the statutory records like EPF, B-Register, Service Record same age is

registered, she was entitled to continue in the service of the 2nd Party up to 12.08.2005. The 2nd Party conducted

Medical Examination illegally and removed her from service; she was orally refused employment w.e.f 28.06.1998 by

assigning reason that, she has passed 58 years. Some of the Co-worker who were similarly removed from service

approached the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka and by the order of the Hon’ble High Court the Management

reinstated the pre-matured retired employees. At that point of time about 100 Mining workers were removed from

service on Medical ground. They have not changed her Date of Birth in the Official records, 3 months notice was not

issued to her neither 3 months salary was paid to her. The 2nd Party acted contrary to its own Certified Standing Order.

Hence, the prayer for reinstatement with continuity of service and with full back wages.

I Party

II Party

Smt. Shirumaniyamma,

W/o Late Munuswamy,

Valagerehalli Village & Post,

Bagur Hobli,

Channarayapatna Taluk

HASSAN DIST.

Karnataka.

The Managing Director,

Mysore Minerals Limited,

No. 39, M.G. Road,

Bangalore – 560001.

2740

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2.

The claim allegation is countered by the Management succinctly stating that, the dispute filed after 10 years

from the date of termination of service is time barred, she was given 30 days time to prefer appeal before the Appellate

Medical Board as per rules, she did not avail the opportunity, she waited for the result of the case filed by the Co-

workers who had approached the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka. The success of W.P. No. 5615/2001 and

26101/2001 before the Hon’ble High Court Karnataka inspired her to file this dispute after lapse of 10 years.

3.

Further, it is stated that the 2nd Party arranged for Medical Examination for all employees and workers during

the year 1997-98 as required under Mines Rules 1995, which is a requirement under law. A team of qualified and senior

Medical Officers from Hutti Gold Mines Co. Ltd., were specifically entrusted to carry out Medical Examination; the 1st

Party was found incapacitated to work in Mine, since she was 58 year on the date of Medical Examination. Hence, the

2nd Party decided to terminate her service; without filling appeal she opted to receive monetary benefits arising from the

termination. She has received the terminal benefit without any protest, now she has no right to raise the dispute. There

is no relationship of employer and employee between the parties. Hence, the reference is not maintainable and this

Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the reference.

4.

After completion of the pleadings, both parties have adduced their evidence.

5.

The Management adduced evidence through its Assistant Manager, he produced photo copy of the B-Register

maintained by the 2nd Party, according to which her Date of Birth is 12.08.1947. During his cross-examination the

documents confronted to him from the 1st Party were identified and marked as Ex W-1 to Ex W-6; Ex W-1 is the

Medical Report in Form ‘O’; as per the same she is declared medically unfit due to overage, Ex W-3 is the order passed

in a W.P filed by the similarly placed workmen whereby the Hon’ble High Court ordered the Authorities not to change

the Date of Birth of the petitioner in the Service Register without adopting the procedure known under the law; Ex W-5

is another W.P by similarly placed workmen whereby the order passed by the Respondent was quashed and Ex W-6 is

the Office Order extending the superannuation of its employees from 58 to 60 years.

6.

Further, MW-1 admits that, the 1st Party workman was treated as daily wager and they have not provided

working conditions as per the Mining Act. In his affidavit evidence he had averred that, as per the request made by the

employees union the 2nd Party conducted the medical examination through qualified senior Medical Officer but, during

cross examination he stated that, Tri-partite Settlement was made in the year 1998, it was between the Management,

Mysore Minerals Employees Association and Director of Mines Safety; he experienced ignorance to the question that

Mysore Minerals Employees Association represents only Clerical Staff.

7.

It was further admitted by MW-1 that, despite having technical persons and machinery, in the year 1995 – 1996

2nd Party entrusted its work to Private Party and the Company suffered loss of about 21 Crores in Shimoga and Hassan

District; having suffered loss the management thought of reducing the number of workers and at that juncture

management ordered for Medical Examination of all the Mining Workers. It is further brought forth in his evidence that

as per the Certified Standing Order of the 2nd Party Clause 18 and 24 any termination has to be followed by enquiry

along with 3 months notice pay, but they had not paid 3 months salary to her; he also admits that as per Clause 18.3 of

CDPR Rules change in the Date of Birth as entered in the company Records can only be effected on the Judgment of a

Competent Court otherwise the Date of Birth once recorded will not be changed, he also admits that, the termination

order was not attached with the copy of the Medical Certificate. Further, he admits that before removing 500 employees

on the basis of medical ground, permission was not taken from the Central Government under Industrial Dispute Act.

No steps were taken by the Company to obtain the permission from the Labour Ministry or Labour Secretary; he also

admits that, 1st Party is a illiterate person and he was not furnished with Kannada version/translation of Medical Report.

8.

The 1st Party/WW-1 during the cross-examination admitted that, she raised the dispute after the W.P filed by a

co-worker was allowed and he was reinstated by the 2nd Party as per the order of the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka.

9.

By now it is clear that, for changing the Date of Birth of the 1st Party workman 2nd Party did not have either an

order from the Competent Court of a Scientific Report of her age to disqualify her has unfit. Only ailment mentioned in

Medical Certificate in Form-O is ‘overage’; the mode adopted by them to remove other similarly placed workman is

thwarted by the Hon’ble High Court and those persons were reinstated to their original post. Due to her termination on

the ground of medical unfitness 1st Party workman lost 7 years of service. Though it is said that, she could have fought

against the management before the Appellate Authority, one shall be reminded that, she is an illiterate, manual worker

and the Medical Certificate issued to her was in English Language, and it is highly possible that she was unaware of

niceties of law. Another drawback in the case of the 2nd Party is at that point of time they had removed 500 workers

without obtaining permission by the Appropriate Government of the Chapter V-A of the Act, specifically in violation of

sections 25F, G, H and N 2 of the Act. As admitted by the workman, she has raised the Industrial Dispute after her

colleagues won the battle against the management before the Hon’ble High Court. However, it is the settled position of

law that Articled 137 of the Schedule of Limitation Act is not applicable to the Industrial Dispute Act for raising the

dispute.

10.

Now the question is the relief that, the 1st Party is entitled to get. She has crossed the age of superannuation

long back; she has raised the dispute after a delay of 6 years. Keeping a holistic view of the matter, in my considered

opinion a lump sum compensation would equalise the situation; arithmetical calculation of the retrenchment calculated

in accordance with Section 25-F(b) 1 month notice pay + retrenchment compensation i.e., 15 days average pay for every

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2741

completed year of continuous service or any part thereon, in case of 6 months will not condone the illegality committed

by the 2nd Party. Having regard to the length of time spent the expense incurred by her in prosecuting the case, I am of

the view that a lump sum compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- would be appropriated relief for her. Hence, the following

AWARD

The reference is accepted. 2nd Party is directed to pay compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- to the 1st Party

workman within 60 days from today otherwise the amount shall carry future interest of 8% per annum.

(Dictated, corrected and signed by me on 10st April, 2019)

JUSTICE SMT. RATHNAKALA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 672-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ

dqæseq[k vk;ju vksj dEiuh fyfeVsM izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] csaxywj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 15@2009½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&26011@5@2008&vkbZvkj¼,e½]

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 672.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 15/2009) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Bangalore now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Employers in relation to the

management of M/s Kudremukh Iorn Cmpany Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central

Government on 23.4.2019.

[No. L-26011/5/2008-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIUBNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

DATED

:

1st APRIL 2019

PRESENT

:

JUSTICE SMT. RATHNAKALA, Presiding Officer

C R No.15/2009

I Party

II Party

The General Secretary,

Karnataka Coffee Curing & General Workers

Union,

AITUC Tamil Colony,

CHICKMAGALUR.

The General Manager,

Kudremukh Iron Ore Company Limited,

Kudremukh,

CHICKMAGALUR.

Appearances

I Party :

Shri Muralidhara, Advocate

II Party :

Smt. K Subha Ananthi, Advocate

1.

The Central Government vide order No.L-26011/5/2008-IR(M) dated 04.03.2009 in exercise of the power

conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

(hereinafter referred as “The Act”) (14 of 1947) made this reference for adjudication of the following Industrial Dispute:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of M/s. Allied Construction Company in denying bonus to their

workers for the year 2003 – 2004 is justified? If not, to what relief these workers are entitled to? Whether the

management of Kudremukh Iron ore Company Limited, Kudremukh, as a Principal Employer, is responsible to

pay bonus for the year 2003 – 2004 to the contract workers employed by its contractor M/s Allied Construction

Company in the event of failure on the part of the said contractor to pay bonus for the said period to these

workers? If so, to what relief the workers are entitled?”

2742

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2.

The claim set forth by the 1stParty is, the 2ndParty management is the Principle Employer and they worked

under the Contractor; the contractor has employed 75 workers for the works to carry out by the Principle Employer. The

workers continued to work under different contractors. During 2000 – 2001 they were working under Alpha Tech

Nirman Private Limited, who replaced the earlier contractor; without break the workmen have continued to work; they

are entitled for bonus for the year 2003 – 2004; they are paid bonus for the financial years 1998 - 1999, 1999 – 2000, the

earlier contractor used to pay bonus in the form of exgratia, adhoc amount etc., they have worked continuously for the

year 2003 – 2004, hence, entitled for bonus for the said period. II Party earned profit for the year 2003 – 2004. Thus,

they are entitled for maximum bonus, they are denied statutory bonus of 8.33 %. The Principle Employer is responsible

to ensure payment of statutory bonus but it has failed to comply its legal obligations. Hence, prayer for a direction to

the 2nd Party to pay @ 20 % Bonus to the workman employed by them for the financial year 2003 – 2004 with a further

direction to Principle Employer to pay the said amount.

3.

2nd Party contested the claim; they have stated that it is not responsible for payment of bonus or any benefit. As

per the work order in favour of II party, they were obliged to abide by the terms of the Contract Labour (R&A) act,

Minimum Wages Act, Workmen’s Compensation Act, PF Act, Mines act.

4.

The contractor engaged few casual workers to carry out certain jobs on temporary basis for a specified period.

2nd Party ensured Minimum Wages, PF contribution, safety applications etc., which they did. The dispute is raised after a

lapse of 5 to 6 years. The workers having settled all their dues have now raised this dispute for bonus which is purely

between them and the contractor.

5.

To substantiate their contention 2nd Party placed on record, the evidence of its Assistant Manager (Personnel)

along with the documents Work Order, Contractors Licence, the Renewal Licence, its Registration Certificate (Ex M-1

to Ex M-4). During the cross-examination the witness admits that 2nd Party did not verify whether the contractor paid

the bonus for the workers for the period 2003 -2004.

6.

The 1st party who all along prosecuted the case has opted not to adduce rebuttal evidence Ex M-1/the work

order does not incorporate in itself such burden on the II Party to payment of bonus to the workman; it is not the

statutory bonus of 8.33% which the 1st Party are claiming. Their claim is 20% in respect of the year 2003- 2004.The

dispute is raised in the year 2009; they have no grievance in respect of any legal dues from the contractor; at this point

of time where they have severed relationship by accepting their dues from their employer, there is no justification to

pass on the burden on the Principle Employer for the payment of bonus. Security Amount / Bank guarantee which the

employer will be holding against the contractor will not operate after cessation of their contractual relationship. In that

view of the matter, there is no justification on behalf of the II Party No. 2 in denying bonus for the year 2003 – 2004.

Hence,

AWARD

Reference is Rejected

(Dictated to U D C, transcribed by him, corrected and signed by me on 1st April 2019)

JUSTICE SMT. RATHNAKALA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 673-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ

dqæseq[k vk;ju vksj dEiuh fyfeVsM izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] csaxywj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 45@2009½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&26011@3@2007&vkbZvkj¼,e½]

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 673.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 45/2009) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Bangalore now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to management of

M/s Kudremukh Iorn Cmpany Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on

23.4.2019.

[No. L-26011/3/2007-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2743

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIUBNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

DATED

:

1st APRIL 2019

PRESENT :

JUSTICE SMT. RATHNAKALA, Presiding Officer

C R No.45/2009

I Party

II Party

The General Secretary,

Karnataka Coffee Curing & General Workers Union,

AITUC Tamil Colony,

CHICKMAGALUR.

The General Manager,

Kudremukh Iron Ore Company Limited, Kudremukh,

CHICKMAGALUR.

Appearances

I Party :

Shri Muralidhara, Advocate

II Party :

Smt. K Subha Ananthi, Advocate

AWARD

1.

The Central Government vide order No. L-26011/3/2007-IR(M) dated 10.09.2009 in exercise of the power

conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

(hereinafter referred as “The Act”) (14 of 1947) made this reference for adjudication with the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Kudremukh Iron Ore Co. Ltd. in not regularizing the services of 24

workers mentioned in the list enclosed is legal and correct? To what relief they are entitled to and from which

date?”

2.

The claim of the I Party Union is that the I Party Union represents the workman employed in the Coffee Curing

establishments and other general service industries. The workman employed in various canteens run and maintained by

II Party is its members. 2nd party is engaged in Mining and Processing Iron Ore and has legal obligation to run and

maintain industrial canteen for the benefit of it’s employees. It runs a canteen in Crush and Concentrator Department

through a committee constituted for this purpose and subsidises the business day today affairs like deciding menu

hygiene etc is handled by the canteen committee. It has given rent free accommodation, free electricity, water, gas and

other items to run the canteen, furniture, utensils and other equipment is also provided; wages are paid directly by the II

party to the employees of the canteen. The workman serving in the canteen are not paid wages as per standard wages.

Their service is exploited. The administrative control appointment, promotions, disciplinary jurisdiction over the

canteen is exercised by the II Party. All these years the workers had legitimate expectation that they will be absorbed in

the service of the company, the II party when requested did not accept to regularise their service. Hence, the claim for

direction to the II party to absorb them in the service of the II Party w.e.f. the date of joining the service etc.

3.

The claim is countered by 2nd Party. It is stated that the 1st Party union is an outsider, not recognized by the 2nd

Party and it has no locus standi to raise the dispute. All the I Party employees are the employees of the contractor H S

Hiryanna and the 2ndParty is the Principal Employer. The contract with H S Hiryanna will end by 31.07.2010. The

contractor has been awarded contract by following the due procedure. The contractor is a necessary party to this

dispute. Hiriyanna is a licenced contractor. His contract is extended from 01.02.20019 for another 11 months. The

Senior Manager (P L E) has issued a letter dated 14.07.2008 that contract will end by 30.06.2010 and he has to return

the properties of the company. There are no sanctioned posts as far as Crush and Concentrator Department is

concerned. There is no question of regularisation of the erst while contract employees. They do not intend to continue

the contract of any contractor w.e.f. 01.08.2010.Now the mining is closed as per the direction of Hon’ble Supreme

Court. Strength of employees is decreased from 2200 to 415, they do not require additional canteen.

4.

It is further stated, that the canteen workers are engaged by the contractor not by the II Party. The contract was

awarded based on the tender process. Wages to the workers is paid by contractor. Management of the II party has no

control over the canteen workers regarding engagement, supervision and control. A canteen management committee

consisting of management representative and workers representative oversees functioning of the area, quality of food,

cleanliness and hygine, etc., rent free accommodation and other facilities are provided as per the terms of the contract,

for the welfare of the employees. There is no Master and Servant relationship between the II Party and the workers. The

management ensures payment of minimum wages, PF Recovery and workman compensation by the contractor. The

claim is not justified.

5.

On completion of the pleadings to discharge the burden of proving the issue the management examined two

witnesses and rebuttal evidence is not adduced. Both have submitted their arguments.

6.

The first witness examined by the II Party was the Senior Manager (Personal) / MW1 the second witness was

the Deputy Manager (HR) / MW 2. MW 1 produced the documents Ex M-1 to Ex M-8 pertaining to the contract

awarded to Hiriyanna and extension of tenure of vide letter dated 14.07.2010/Ex M-8 of the Senior Manager. Hiriyanna

is informed about the closure of period of contract on 13.07.2018 with a direction to handover the properties belonging

2744

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

to the company. During his cross-examination the 1stParty confronted certain documents which the witness admitted.

They are the Annual Subscription to the provident fund scheme pertaining to three workers in the name of the II Party

(Ex W-1), One PF Slip pertains to H S Hiryanna (Ex W-1(a)); wage registers with the name of H S Hiriyanna as one of

the worker (Ex W-2); three wage slips under the name of the establishment H S Hiryanna (Ex W-4).

7.

MW 2 brought on record that the closure procedure is on and the possession of the mines has to be handed over

to the officer designated by the ministry. Many of the regular employees were transferred to other places and others

have opted for VRS. For the benefit of continuing employees canteen facility is continued. He produced the Original

Work Order issued to the contractor during February 2009 and also subsequent extension of contract, the licence

obtained by the contractor under Contract Labour Regulation & Abolition Act is also produced. During his further

course of examination in chief he placed on record the mining operation is stopped w.e.f. 01.01.2006 vide orders of the

apex court dated 30.10.2002 in I A 670/2001 in WP(C) No. 202/1995 and dated 12.05.2006 in I A 1150/2003, IA no.

1010/2003 in WP (C) No. 202/1995 the mine is taken over by Sh. B Ram Mohan, Regional Controller of Mines, Indian

Bureau of Mines, Ministry of Mines, on 03.04.2014. Kudremukh Mining and Beneficiation Equipments are sold to

Annam Steels Private Limited as per sale contract dated 12.12.2012 and they are dismantling the equipment’s, the

supporting documents are Ex M-13 and Ex M-14.

8.

During the cross-examination it was brought forth that now the earlier casual workers are employed to work in

the canteen on contract basis. It was also suggested because of the management concerned 24 workmen were not listed

in the voters list by the Union, which the witness denied.

9.

Despite the strong case set up by the 2nd Party that 1stParty are employed under H S Hiriyanna who is a licenced

contractor, 1st Party have opted not to adduced rebuttal evidence.

10.

Thus an opportunity to canvass before this tribunal about their case to the effect that it was a sham and bogus

contract and they are really the workman of the II Party is lost for them. As such H S Hiriyanna subsequently raised a

dispute challenging his termination which is adjudicated today (in C R No. 06/2014). Whatever observation made in the

said case applies to the present case also. The Points of reference presupposes that the 1stParty 24 workers are the

workmen of the 2ndParty.When it is shown by the 2nd Party that Hiriyanna had employed 17 workers, the 1st Party failed

to demonstrate that the dispute is espoused on behalf of 24 workers working at Crush and Concentrator

Department.Now, the law is very much settled that when a recognized union or inside union is not co-operating with the

workman having dispute with its employer, there is no illegality on the part of outside union espousing the dispute. The

question is only with regard to the identity of the canteen workers. The documents marked through the management

witness are insufficient to hold that they were working directly under the control and supervision of the II Party

management. MW 2 has clarified that the II Party used to disburse the wages to the workmen on behalf of the

contractor. If their service is terminated without following the mandatory procedure by Section 25(F) of the Act, the

proper party to answer the claim is H S Hiriyanna who held the licence for catering in the 2nd Party but he figures in the

list of the 1st Party workmen. The facilities provided to the canteen is a welfare measure for the benefit of the

employees of the II Party. It is nowhere shown that these workmen worked against any sanctioned post. On the top of it

the mining operation itself has closed and the work force has migrated. In the light of the above, the tribunal does not

find any irregularity in not regularising the service of 24 workers who worked in the canteen. Hence,

AWARD

Reference is Rejected

(Dictated to U D C, transcribed by him, corrected and signed by me on 1st April 2019)

JUSTICE SMT. RATHNAKALA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 674-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ

;wukbVsM bf.M;k b';ksjsa'k dEiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] ,ukZdqye ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 12@2015½ dks

izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&17012@146@2014&vkbZvkj¼,e½]

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 674.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 12/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Ernakulam now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to management of

M/s United India Insurance Company Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on

18.4.2019.

[No. L-17012/146/2014-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2745

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

ERNAKULAM

Present: Shri V. Vijaya Kumar, B.Sc., LLM, Presiding Officer.

(Thursday the 2nd day of April, 2019)

ID No.12/2015

Workman :

Shri.Vijayan Pillai.P.,

Sikha Bhavanam,

Panayam, Kollam.

By Adv. B.Mohanlal

Management

:

1) The General Manager,

United India Insurance Company Ltd.,

Head Office, Chennai.

2) The Deputy General Manager,

United India Insurance Company Ltd.,

Regional Office, Kochi.

By Adv. T.J.Lakshmanan and M/s. B.S.Krishnan Associates

This case coming up for hearing on 02.04.2019, this Tribunal cum Labour Court passed the following on the

same day.

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of subsection (1) subsection (2A) of Section 10 of Industrial

Dispute Act 1947 the Central Government/Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-17012/146/2014-IR(M) dated

19.02.2015 referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication.

2.

The dispute is

“Whether the action of the Management of M/s. United India Insurance Company limited is denying

the pay arrears and statutory benefits of Shri.Vijayan Pillai, Ex-caretaker of the Training Institute of the

Company on his termination is correct? If not, then what relief workman is entitled to?”

3.

While the pleadings were being finalized, the Management raised a preliminary issue regarding the

maintainability of the dispute and reference. According to the Management the only issue to be answered is whether

there is denial of pay arrears or statutory benefits to the workman on his termination and if so what is the relief that he is

entitled to. Legality or justifiability of the termination is not a question referred for adjudication. S.2A was introduced as

per Industrial Dispute Amendment Act, 1965. Tracing the legislative history, it was pointed out by the learned Counsel

for the Management that S.2A was incorporated into Industrial Dispute Act to enable individual workman to challenge

dismissal and discharge without being sponsored by the Union or a number of workmen. Hence it is mandatory that

legality or justifiability of termination is part of the reference and dispute, when an individual workman invokes S.2A(I)

for adjudication of his claim.

4.

The Counsel for the workman submitted that he challenged the legality of termination also before the Assistant

Labour Commissioner (C), however the reference is silent on same. Hence he again moved the Assistant Labour

Commissioner (C) for modification of the reference and to include the challenge of illegality of his termination. His

application was disposed of by the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) holding that the dispute raised by the workman

is pending before this court. Further the Counsel for the workman submitted that inspite of the above How, this dispute

can be entertained by this Court under section 2(A)(2) of Industrial Dispute Act. He further submitted that there are

authorities to support his argument. But he failed to produce any authority inspite of the fact that adequate time was

given for production of the same.

5.

The specific issue to be decided is,

“Whether a reference under S.2(A)(I) read with S.10(I)(d) of Industrial dispute Act. 1947 is maintainable when

the eligibility or justifiability of termination is not referred for adjudication.”

6.

As per S.2(A)(I) of the Act, when an employer discharges, dismisses, retrenches or otherwise terminates the

services of an individual workman any dispute or difference between that workman and his employee connected with or

arising out of such termination shall be deemed to be an industrial dispute. From the language of the section it is clear

that only disputes relating to discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or termination of individual workman will fall within

the purview of the Section. Any dispute connected with or arising out of such termination implies that the legality or

justifiability of the termination itself shall be under challenge.

2746

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

7.

The Counsel for the workman strongly argued that this court can decide the dispute invoking section 2(A)(2) of

the ID Act. As per Section 2(A)(2), a workman specified in section 2(A)(I) can move the Labour court or Tribunal for

the adjudication of the dispute. There is no provision under the Act to convert a reference under Section 10 read with

Section 2(A)(1) to an application under 2(A)(2). Further an application under S.2(A)(2) shall be filed within three years

of termination.

8.

The learned counsel for the Management/Petitioner also pointed out that in view of the mandate under

Section10(4) of the Industrial Dispute Act when the appropriate Government has specified the points of dispute for

adjudication, this court shall confine its adjudication to those points.

In view of the above, the preliminary issue regarding maintainability of the dispute is answered in favour of the

Management.

9.

The first relief claimed in the claim statement by the workman is to declare the dismissal of the workman

without any reason, illegal and unjust. As already pointed out, this claim of the workman is not maintainable as it is not

part of the reference at all. It is seen from the records of the proceedings that the workman moved the Assistant Labour

Commissioner (C) on 05.07.2016 for amending the reference.

Because of the pendency of this Industrial Dispute, the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) refused to entertain

the amendment application. In view of the finding in the preliminary issue, nothing remains in this reference for

adjudication.

For the reasons stated above an award is passed dismissing the claim of the workman as not maintainable.

The award will come into force one month after publication in the official gazette.

Dictated to the Personal Assistant, transcribed and typed by him, corrected and passed by me on this the 2nd day

of April, 2019.

V. VIJAYA KUMAR, Presiding Officer

APPENDIX

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 675-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ

;wukbVsM ÝsV dSfj;j izkbosV fyfeVsM ,oa vU; izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 23@2016½ dks

izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&26012@1@2016&vkbZvkj¼,e½]

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 675.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 23/2016) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in the relation to the

management of M/s United Freight Carriers Pvt. Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central

Government on 18.4.2019.

[No. L-26012/1/2016-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 28th day of February, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 23/2016

Between:

Sri Mulakapalli Raju,

S/o Late Chinna Rao,

D.No.26-1-16/9, S.C. Colony,

Chinagantyada, Gajuwada,

Visakhapatnam (A.P.)

…Petitioner

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2747

AND

1.

M/s. United Freight Carriers Pvt. Limited,

D.no.7-4-32, Chettivanipalem, Gajuwaka,

Visakhapatnam – 530026.

2.

M/s. Sri Krishna Engineering & Construction Co.,

‘Kalyani’, 9/2, M.V.P. Colony,

Visakhapatnam (A.P.) – 530 017.

…Respondents

Appearances:

For the Petitioner

:

Sri Paila Srinivasa Rao, Advocate

For the Respondents

:

Sri A.S. Rama Sarma, Advocate for R2

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L- 26012/1/2016-IR(M) dated 15.2.2016/

17.2.2016 referred the following dispute under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal

between the management of M/s. United Freight Carriers Pvt. Limited and their workman. The reference is,

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of management of M/s. United Freight Carriers Pvt. Ltd., Visakhapatnam and Sri Krishna

Engineering & Construction Co. Visakhapatnam (Contrator of RINL, Visakhapatnam Steel Plant) in

termination of Shri Mulkapalli Raju, Ex-contract worker in violation of Section 25(F) of Industrial Disputes

Act, is legal and justified? If not, to what relief he is entitled?”

On receipt of the reference it is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 23/2016 and notices were issued to the parties

concerned.

2.

The case stands posted for filing of claim statement and documents by the Petitioner Union.

3.

Inspite of repeated calls, the Petitioner did not turn up. Several opportunities have been given to the Petitioner

Workman to attend the court to prosecute the case. But the Petitioner workman failed to attend this Tribunal which

clearly indicates that perhaps the dispute of the Petitioner workman has already been settled and the Petitioner has got

nothing to raise any claim against the Respondents. Hence, the case of the Petitioner workman is closed and a ‘No

dispute’ award is passed.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant, corrected by me on this the 28th day of

February, 2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 676-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ

ts;wMh lhesUV fyfeVsM izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] dksydkrk ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 89@2015½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 23-4-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&29011@13@2015&vkbZvkj¼,e½]

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

2748

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 676.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 89/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Kolkata now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s JUD Cements Limited

and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 23.4.2019.

[No. L-29011/13/2015-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA

Reference No. 89 of 2015

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of CMD, JUD Cements Limited

AND

Their workmen

Present : Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra, Presiding Officer

Appearance:

On behalf of the Management

:

None

On behalf of the Workmen

:

None

Dated: 12th April, 2019.

Industry: Cement

AWARD

By Order No.L-29011/13/2015-IR(M) dated 28.10.2015 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in

exercise of its powers under Section 10(1)(d) and (2A) referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

“Whether the action of the management of JUD Cements Ltd. by not paying full & final payment to its

employee Shri Sudhansu Gantayet, Ex-Vice President (operation) is legal and/or justified? If not, what relief

workman is entitled to?”

2.

When the case is taken up for hearing on 02.04.2019, none appeared for the parties concerned. In fact the

parties never appeared before this Tribunal. It transpires from record that though this reference is pending in this

Tribunal since 30.11.2015 and inspite of all the opportunities, neither the workman concerned has filed his statement of

claim, nor the management has filed its written statement to proceed further with the case.

4.

On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the workman has no grievance at

present in respect of his full and final payment as mentioned in the order of reference. Therefore, there exists no dispute

for adjudication.

5.

Therefore, the reference is disposed of accordingly.

Justice RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer

Dated, Kolkata,

The 12th April, 2019.

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 677-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ

dsUnzh; Hk.Mkj.k fuxe ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] dksydkrk ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 58@2014½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26-4-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&42011@1@2014&vkbZvkj¼,e½]

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 677.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 58/2014) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Kolkata now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Central Warehousing

Corporation and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 26.4.2019.

[No. L-42011/1/2014-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2749

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA

Reference No. 58 of 2014

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of the Regional Manager, Central Warehousing Corporation

AND

Their workmen.

Present : Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra, Presiding Officer

Appearance :

On behalf of the Management

: None

On behalf of the Workmen

: None

Dated: 22nd April, 2019.

Industry : Warehousing

AWARD

By Order No.L-42011/1/2014-IR(M) dated 04.07.2014 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in

exercise of its powers under Section 10(1)(d) and (2A) referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

“Whether the action of the management of Central Warehousing Corporation in not relieving all workmen I

the transfer list dated 28.8.13 & 5.10.13 & arbitrarily choosing the workmen to be relieved in unfair manner is

legal and/or justified? If not, to what relief the workmen concerned are entitled to?”

2.

In this reference case both the union and the management previously entered appearance through their

respective learned counsel. Union filed its statement of claim praying for implementing transfer orders dated 28.08.2013

and 05.10.2013 issued by the Assistant Manager (Amin). Management filed its written statement denying the claim of

the union. Union also filed its rejoinder to counter the statement of the management. Photo copies of some documents

have also been filed by the union to support its case. But the union, as it transpires from record, remained absent since

04.07.2018. Inspite of sufficient opportunity the union has not led any evidence to substantiate its case. It also transpires

from record that the union refused to receive the notice dated 12.06.2018 issued by this Tribunal.

3.

On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the union has no grievance at

present in respect of not relieving the workmen as per transfer list dated 28.8.13 & 5.10.13 as mentioned in the order of

reference. Therefore, there exists no dispute for adjudication.

4.

Therefore, the reference is disposed of accordingly.

Justice RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer

Dated, Kolkata,

The 22nd April, 2019.

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 678-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ

vks-,u-th-lh- fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 7@2004½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23-4-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- tsM&16025@4@2019&vkbZvkj¼,e½]

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 678.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 7/2004) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s O.N.G.C. Limited

and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 23.4.2019.

[No. Z-16025/4/2019-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

2750

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,

Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 04th April, 2019

Complaint (CGITA) No. 07/2004

(Old Complaint (ITC) No. 8/2010)

Senva Ambalal,

Village Kathwada, Tal. Matar, Navgam, Kheda (Gujarat)

C/o

Gujarat Petroleum Employees Union,

434-46, Gandhivas, Koba Road, Sabarmati,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…Complainant

V/s

1. M/s Public Power Mazdoor Kamdar Sahakari Mandli Ltd.,

Opp. Dhoot Sagar Dairy, Highway Road, Mehsana (Gujarat)

2. M/s Parishram Labour Co-operative Society Ltd.,

19, Sahjanand Shopping Centre, Shahibaug, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

3. The G.G.M. (P),

ONGC, Avni Bhavan, 5th Floor, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

4. The General Manager (OBG),

ONGC, Avni Bhavan, 5th Floor, Sabarmati,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…Respondents

For the Complainant

:

Sh. Arish L. Saiyed

For the Opponent No.1

:

Absent

For the Opponent No.2

:

Absent

For the Opponent No. 3 & 4

:

Shri K.V. Gadhia & Shri M.K. Patel

ORDER

1. This is a complaint Ex. 1 moved under Section 33-A of the Industrial Disputes Act by the complainant Senva

Ambalal on 17.02.2000 in Reference (ITC) No. 35/1998 alleging that the complainant has been working with

the opposite party no. 1 M/s Public Power Mazdoor Kamdar Sahakari Mandli Ltd., Opp. Dhoot Sagar Dairy,

Highway Road, Mehsana under sham arrangement of contract on the establishment of opposite party no. 3 The

G.G.M. (P), ONGC, Avni Bhavan, 5th Floor, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad and opposite party no. 4 The General

Manager, ONGC, Avni Bhavan, 5th Floor, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad, so called real employer. The opposite party

no. 1 was later changed by the opposite party no. 2 M/s Parishram Labour Co-operative Society Ltd., 19,

Sahjanand Shopping Centre, Shahibaug, Ahmedabad. He has further alleged that he has also been a workman

in Reference (ITC) No. 35/1998 shown at serial no. 48 in the list attached with the reference. He has been

working at the establishment of ONGC at GGS II (OEG) since 08.01.1987 without any break with full

satisfaction of the supervisors. He worked during January 1999, February 1999 and March 1999, thereafter for

4 days in April 1999 but he was not paid the wages for the said period despite making written representation to

ONGC. He has further alleged that he has been working since 1987 but his services were terminated orally

without paying any notice and notice pay. Therefore, he has prayed for reinstatement with full back wages and

the unpaid as stated above.

2. All the parties were issued notice but only the opposite party no. 3 The G.G.M. (P), ONGC, Avni Bhavan, 5th

Floor, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad submitted the written statement Ex. 4 submitting that there was no master

servant relationship with the workman and ONGC and after enquiry, no such workman was found on the

muster roll of ONGC. He never made any representation to the ONGC for pending of wages; therefore, the

complaint is liable to be rejected.

3. Earlier the complainant has deposed vide Ex. 5 and reiterated the facts stated in the complaint, thereafter the

complaint was proceeded ex-parte and the then Presiding Officer, Shri B.I. Kazi passed the order ex-parte and

allowed the complaint with 60% back wages.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2751

4. Against the said ex-parte award, the opposite party ONGC has filed Misc. Application (CGITA) No. 01/2007

for restoration of Complainant (CGITA) No. 07/2004 and said Misc. Application (CGITA) No. 01/2007 was

allowed by the State Industrial Tribunal vide order dated 14.09.2010.

5. After the restoration of the complaint, the complainant Ambalal K. Senva has expired on 14.10.2009 and legal

heirs of the complainant Paresh Ambalal Senva moved an application Ex. 23 which was allowed on 26.07.2017

and legal heirs were substituted accordingly in place of deceased complainant.

6. On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:

i.

Whether the deceased complainant Ambalal Sanva was a contract employee and the contract was sham and

bogus?

ii.

Whether the complainant was the employee of ONGC?

iii.

To what relief, if any, the legal heir of the deceased complainant is entitled?

7. Issue No. i, ii and iii: As all the issues are interrelated, therefore, are decided together. The legal heirs of the

complainant filed an affidavit 24 reiterating the averments made in the complaint. In his cross-examination, he

has stated that besides him, his mother and sisters are the legal heirs of his deceased father. He is working as a

security guard in a company through contractor who is also a contractor of ONGC. He has stated that his

deceased father was also a contract labour. He does not know as to whether ONGC has given any appointment

letter to his father or not. He has further stated that the contractor paid the wages to his father. He does not have

any proof to show that his father was served with the contractor for more than 240 days in any calendar year.

His father was received wages for the days he used to work. His father has maintained the whole family till his

death.

8. From the pleadings of the parties and oral evidence available on record, it is established that the deceased

complainant was the employee of contractor M/s Public Power Mazdoor Kamdar Sahakari Mandli Ltd. ONGC

has no master and servant relationship with the deceased complainant, therefore, ONGC bears no liability

regarding the deceased complainant. Considering the above stated facts and settled legal position by the apex

court that even in non-compliance of Section 25 F with the daily wager, proper relief to be granted is

compensation and not reinstatement as held by the apex court in case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited V/s

Mansingh, 2012 (1) SCC 558. Since the complainant was expired on 14.10.2009 i.e. during the pendency of the

complaint, hence even on this point, the complainant is not entitled to get reinstated. As held by the apex court

in various pronouncements, the legal heirs of the complainant are entitled to get lump-sum compensation. Thus

it would be appropriate to award a lump-sum compensation of Rs.50000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) to be paid

to the legal heirs of the deceased complainant in lieu of back wages and all other employment dues. No relief

can be granted against ONGC. All the issues are decided accordingly.

9. The opposite party no. 1 M/s Public Power Mazdoor Kamdar Sahakari Mandli Ltd., Opp. Dhoot Sagar Dairy,

Highway Road, Mehsana is directed to pay the aforesaid amount of Rs.50000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) to the

legal heirs of the deceased complainant within 60 days from the publication of this order.

10. The order is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 679-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj LVsV cSad

bankSj ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 127@2005½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26@4@2019 dks

izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12012@30@2005&vkbZvkj¼ch&1½]

ch- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 679.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 127/2005) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of Indore and

their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 26.4.2019.

[No. L-12012/30/2005-IR(B-1)]

B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.

2752

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/127/2005

General Secretary,

Nationalised Bank Karmchari Sangathan,

9, Sanwer Road,

Ujjain.

…Workman/Union

Versus

General Manager (O),

State Bank of Indore,

Head Office, Indore (MP)

…Management

AWARD

Passed on this 28th day of March 2019

1. As per letter dated 11-11-2005 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labor, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-

12012/30/2005-IR(B-I). The dispute under reference relates to:

“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of Indore in imposing the penalty of stoppage of

Head Cashier allowance and stoppage of 2 annual increments as well as treating the suspension period as

“off duty” after reducing the proposed punishment of compulsory retirement from service on Shri

Jagdish Prasad Gautam is legal and justified? If not, what relief he is entitled?”

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Workman filed statement of claim. In his

statement of claim, workman has stated that he was first appointed as clerk cum cashier with the Vidisha

branch of the Bank on 8-6-77. During the course of service, he was transferred at Nateran branch and was

posted as Head cashier in the year 1982. He was issued a charge sheet by the department on the basis of

information, given by the Branch Manager of the Bank on 16-3-1985. This charge sheet was further amended

and an amended charge sheet dated 9-4-85 was issued, he filed a written reply of the charge sheet. Mr.

J.C.Mahajan was appointed as Enquiry Officer who conducted enquiry without allowing the workman to bring

his representative. The Presenting Officer persuaded the workman to admit the charges and it is on his

persuasion, he admitted the charges. The Enquiry Officer filed an Enquiry Report dated 12-6-85 holding the

workman guilty. The finding was against fact and evidence because there was no witness to examine during the

enquiry to prove the charges. The appointing authority passed order of dismissal on the basis of Enquiry Report

without giving any opportunity of personal hearing on the proposed sentence. The workman filed an appeal

before the departmental Appellate Authority who set aside the termination and passed the impugned

punishment regarding stoppage of Head cashier allowance and 2 annual increments as well as of treating

suspension period as “off duty” which is against law and against bipartite settlement above mentioned.

Accordingly. the workman prayed for setting aside of impugned punishment and back wages accordingly.

3. The employer Bank, in their Written statement of defense just raised the preliminary objection that since the

workman has now been promoted as Manager and posted in Vidisha Branch, he cannot be treated as a

workman as defined under Section 2(s) of ID Act, 1947, hence the reference is not maintainable before the

Tribunal. It was also pleaded that during the period workman was posted in Nateran branch, complaints of

grave misconduct and misbehavior were received against him. He was suspended on 24-1-1985 and

chargesheet dated 16-3-1985 , which was amended and amended chargesheet dated 9th April 1985 were served

on him. The charges were that on 29th September 1984, workman refused to open the cash safe of the branch

adversely affecting the working of Bank, on that date, he did not furnish his cash scroll to the Manager and

other 3 charges regarding misappropriation of money and in subordination, mentioned in the para-9 of Written

Statement asunder-

1.

The applicant on 29-9-84 refused to open the cash safe, therefore the Branch Manager had to

bring Rs.3000 from the Cooperative Bank so as to run the business of the Bank;

2.

On 29-9-1984, the applicant did not handover his cash scroll to the Manager, therefore, a new

scroll was to be opened so as to discharge the daily work;

3.

On 8-12-1984, the applicant did not make payment of Rs.30/- against withdrawal made by

Bank employee Shri Chandrakant Changad despite it was passed by Branch Manager;

4.

On examining the case of dated 10-12-1984, difference of Rs.30/- was found in the cash memo

and cash so collected and payment of Rs.30/- was found to have been made on 10-12-1984

whereas it was passed for 8-12-1984.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2753

5.

The applicant doesnot comply with the office orders issued by the Branch Manager form time

to time and refuses to put signatures on the registers of such orders(e.g he refused to put

signatures for the orders dated 28-9-84 and 8-12-84).

4. It was further pleaded that the workman filed a written explanation for the charges vide his letter dated 27-3-

1985 which were not satisfactory and a regular DE was instituted. The workman unconditionally admitted all

the charges without any fear or coercion. He refused to cross-examine any witness, he also refused to adduce

any evidence in his defense and on the basis of his plead, held guilty. The Enquiry Officer filed his report dated

12-6-1985 holding the charges proved against the workman. After receiving the Enquiry Report, workman was

issued show cause notice on the point of proposed sentence of dismissal on 12-6-1985. He filed written reply of

the notice on 4-7-85. After considering the material, a sentence regarding dismissal was passed by Appointing

Authority on 7-7-85. Workman preferred a departmental appeal which was disposed vide order dated 4-7-86

setting aside the dismissal and passing the impugned punishment as mentioned. It was further pleaded that the

Departmental Enquiry was conducted legally and properly and sentence imposed is not shockingly dis-

appropriate to the charges proved.

5. On the basis of respective pleadings, preliminary issue/ point for determination regarding fairness and legality

of departmental enquiry was framed by his learned predecessor. Preliminary issue was decided by my learned

predecessor vide order dated 25-4-2017 whereby he held the Departmental Enquiry proper and legal. This order

shall be part of this award. Following other issues were framed:-

(2)

Whether the charges alleged against workman are proved from evidence in Enquiry Proceedings?

(3)

Whether the punishment of stoppage of Head Cashier Allowance and two annual increments and

compulsory retirement imposed against workman is legal and proper?

(4)

If so, to what relief the workman is entitled to?

6. It is further to mention here that no further evidence was adduced on the point of 3 issues as mentioned which

were framed later on after deciding preliminary issue. Mr. R. Nagwanshi, representative of the Union preferred

to file written argument which is on record. Learned counsel for management has also filed written argument. I

have gone through the respective written argument and also the record.

7. Point for determination No.2 & 3

In his written statement of claim, workman has himself admitted that he admitted the guilt during the course of

Departmental Enquiry. His case is that he did so on the promise that he will not be terminated from service.

The burden is on the workman to prove this fact of the alleged assurance before the Enquiry Officer to prove

his case that his admission of guilt was not unconditional rather it was after a promise given by the Bank/

Enquiry Officer. He could do so before the Appellate Authority. The records of enquiry have been proved in

evidence during the hearing of preliminary issue No.1. The written admission given by the workman before the

Enquiry Officer is on record which does not show that it was given involuntarily hence on the basis of

admission of charges which is not disputed at any stage, it is held that charges against the workman were

proved during the domestic enquiry.

I am supported by a decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in case of Central Bank of India vs

Karumamoy reported in AIR-1986-80-266 wherein it has been held that if the workman admits his guilt,

then to insist upon the management to let an evidence about the allegations will be an empty formality.

8. On the basis of above discussion, it is held that charges against workman were proved during the domestic

enquiry on the basis of his admission of guilt. The charges proved against workman are as under:-

1.

The applicant on 29-9-84 refused to open the cash safe, therefore the Branch Manager had to

bring Rs.3000 from the Cooperative Bank so as to run the business of the Bank;

2.

On 29-9-1984, the applicant did not handover his cash scroll to the Manager, therefore, a new

scroll was to be opened so as to discharge the daily work;

3.

On 8-12-1984, the applicant did not make payment of Rs.30/- against withdrawal made by

Bank employee Shri Chandrakant Changad despite it was passed by Branch Manager;

4.

On examining the case of dated 10-12-1984, difference of Rs.30/- was found in the cash memo

and cash so collected and payment of Rs.30/- was found to have been made on 10-12-1984

whereas it was passed for 8-12-1984;

5.

The applicant doesnot comply with the office orders issued by the Branch Manager form time

to time and refuses to put signatures on the registers of such orders(e.g he refused to put

signatures for the orders dated 28-9-84 and 8-12-84).

9. These charges relate to the dereliction of duty insubordination hence are in the category of grave misconduct

warranting major punishment. The appellate authority has taken a lenient view in setting aside the termination

2754

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

passed by the Appointing Authority and converting it into stoppage of Head Cashier allowance and 2 annual

increments as well as treating suspension period as “off duty”. Hence in no parameter, the charges can be held

shockingly disproportionate to the charges. Point No.2 is answered accordingly.

10. Point for determination No.4-

On the basis of above discussion, the applicant is not entitled to any relief.

11. In the result, award is passed as under:-

(1) The action of the management of State Bank of Indore in imposing the penalty of stoppage of Head

Cashier allowance and stoppage of 2 annual increments as well as treating the suspension period as

“off duty” after reducing the proposed punishment of compulsory retirement from service on Shri

Jagdish Prasad Gautam is legal and justified.

(2) The workman Shri Jagdish Prasad Gautam is not entitled to any relief.

12. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.

Dated:28-3-2019

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 680-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh;

LVsV cSad ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 66@2009½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26@4@2019 dks

izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12011@70@2008&vkbZvkj¼ch- 1½]

ch- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 680.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 66/2009) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and

their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 26.4.2019.

[No. L-12011/70/2008-IR(B-1)]

B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/66/2009

General Secretary,

Dainik Vetan Bhogi Bank Karmchari Sangathan,

F-1, Tripti Vihar, Opp. Engg. College,

Ujjain.

…Workman/Union

Versus

Chief General Manager,

State Bank of India,

Regional Head Office,

Hoshangabad Road, Bhopal.

…Management

AWARD

Passed on this 27th day of March 2019

1. As per letter dated 1-7-2009 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labor, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-

12011/70/2008-IR(B-I). The dispute under reference relates to:

“Whether Shri Kamal Damodare S/o Shri Motiram Damodare is entitled for payment of difference of

wages as per Bipartite Settlement? If yes, what relief he is entitled to?”

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Workman filed statement of claim. In his

statement of claim, he has claimed his dues from 1-9-95 to 1-4-02 as arrears with an allegation that he had been

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2755

working since 1-9-95 as a daily wager with the MG Road, Indore branch of the bank. He was disengaged by the

employers on 1-4-2002. He raised a dispute with the Central Government and reference was made which was

registered as R/132/95 and award was passed on 25-4-2014. He further stated that his wages were paid by the

Bank from the profit and loss account. He is entitled to pay, details given in Para-9 & 11 of the petition. In the

light of Desai Award and Ist Bipartite Agreement dated 19-10-66 which was not paid to him though he was

entitled to get it. Accordingly he has sought relief regarding the payment of his arrears as mentioned above.

3. Management filed its Written Statement of defense wherein they denied that workman was engaged at any

point of time with the Bank. It was further pleaded by the employers that the workman was simply engaged for

1-2 hours in a day that too purely on casual basis. He was not employed by the Bank. His engaged was against

rules. He was disengaged later on. He raised dispute on the basis of which reference was made by appropriate

Government to this court which was registered as CGIT/LC/R/132/05 and was answered in negative.

Accordingly, he is not entitled to get regular pay scale/ difference of wages as claimed by him which is only for

permanent employees.

4. Both the sides have examined on oath themselves. Workman has examined himself on oath whereas

management has examined Hariom Gupta, Chief Manager on oath who have stated and supported their

respective claims as mentioned above. Copy of the award dated passed in the reference case R/132/2005 is also

on record. At the time of argument, none appeared from the side of Bank.

5. Mr. Ram Nagwanshi appeared as Union Representative on behalf of workman. He submitted oral argument

and also filed memorandum of argument I have gone through the written argument and also gone through the

records.

6. The main argument on behalf of workman is that when it is proved that he has worked with the employer Bank,

he was entitled to difference of salary in the light of bipartite agreement and award as mentioned by him,

details given in his statement of claim whereas the argument of the Bank is that this agreement and award

applies only to regular/ permanent employees of the Bank and not to the casual labors. Hence the point for

determination which arise is as under:-

“Whether it is proved that the workman has been in engagement, may be as daily wager on regular basis

or not.”

Award (Copy) in the connected reference case is on record. Perusal of which reveals that the claim of workman

that he worked continuously for 240 days in the preceding 12 months of his date of disengagement was not

proved and accordingly his disengagement was not held violative of Section 25 B of I.D.Act. It was also held

that the employers were not bound to comply the provisions of Section 25-F before his disengagement in his

case and his disengagement was found legal and proper. There is nothing on record to show that this finding by

the Tribunal has been overturned by any superior Court hence when it is not proved that workman has been in a

regular engagement may be as a daily wager, he cannot be held entitled to any difference of pay as claimed by

him under the award and bipartite agreement.

7. On the basis of above discussion, it is held that the workman Kamal Damodare is not entitled to difference of

wages as per bipartite settlement.

8. In the result, award is passed as under:-

“The workman Shri Kamal Damodare S/o Shri Motiram Damodare is not entitled for payment of

difference of wages as per Bipartite Settlement.”

9. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labor & Employment as per rules.

Dated : 27-3-2019

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 681-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj LVsV cSad

bankSj ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 165@2002½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26@4@2019 dks

izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12012@162@2002&vkbZvkj¼ch&1½]

ch- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo

2756

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 681.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 165/2002) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of Indore and their

workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 26.4.2019.

[No. L-12012/162/2002-IR(B-1)]

B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/165/2002

General Secretary,

Rashtriya Bank Karmchari Sangthan,

9, Sanwer Road, Ujjain (MP)

…Workman/Union

Versus

General Manager (Operations),

State Bank of Indore,

Head Office, 5, Yeshwant Niwas Road,

Indore (MP)

…Management

AWARD

Passed on this 25th day of March 2019

1. As per letter dated 7-11-2002 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is

received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-

12012/162/2002-IR(B-I). The dispute under reference relates to:

“Whether the action of the management of General Manager (Operation), State Bank of Indore in

stopping 4 annual increments with retrospective e effect in r/o Shri Narendra Shah, Daftari is justified?

If not, what relief the workman is entitled?”

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Workman filed statement of claim. In his

statement of claim, workman has alleged that he was first appointed on 29th August 1981 in Paitlavat branch of

State Bank of Indore as a peon. During course of his employment, he was promoted as Daftary in the year

1989. In the year 1994, when he was posted in Rajgarh branch of the Bank, he was called by the then employer

and was given charge of Head cashier and he worked as Head cashier, doing clerical work since 1997. It was

further alleged that the Manager instructed him to issue certificate to one Suraj Pawar, on the fact that Suraj

Pawar has been working since last 3 years with the Bank as a daily wager employee which he issued under the

instruction of the Branch Manager. Also it was alleged that a charge sheet was issued to him with reference to

this certificate and enquiry was conducted against him which was against principles of natural justice, without

giving him a fair chance to put his defense and he was held guilty for the charge of issuing unauthorizedly a

false certificate. It is also his case that before awarding impugned punishment, no opportunity was given to him

on the point of sentence. He raised the dispute with the Government, accordingly he has claimed that the

punishment being excessive be set-aside.

3. The employer bank has pleaded in his Written Statement of defense that when the applicant was posted as

Daftary at Rajgarh branch, he committed certain omissions and commissions and misconduct under Ist

Bipartite Settlement. He was served charge sheet alleging charges and was directed to submit a reply. He

submitted a reply which was not satisfactory. Therefore a domestic enquiry was held. Mr. A.K.Joshi an officer

of the Bank was deputed as Enquiry Officer and S.N.Harbude was made Presenting Officer. During the

enquiry, the workman admitted the charges in writing and in view of his admission/ plead guilty, the charges

were held proved by the Enquiry Officer and thereafter impugned punishment with regard to stoppage of 4

increments with cumulative effect w.e.f. 1991 was passed. Also it was pleaded that the workman did not prefer

any appeal or representation and accepted the punishment and also that the enquiry was conducted properly

keeping in view the principles of natural justice in mind and the punishment is not excessive.

4. On the basis of pleadings, following issues/ points for determination were framed by my learned predecessor:-

(1) Whether the domestic enquiry conducted against workman is proper and legal?

This issue was decided as preliminary issue vide order dated 16-9-2014. This order is also a part of this

award. The domestic enquiry was held legal and properly conducted. Thereafter following other issues/

points for determination was framed by my learned predecessor-

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2757

(2) Whether charges against workman are proved?

(3) Whether punishment of with-holding 4 increments of workman is legal?

(4) What relief the workman is entitled?

5. No further evidence was adduced by any of the parties on these issues. I have heard argument of Mr.Ram

Nagwanshi. None present from the side of management. no written argument were filed by management. I have

gone through the record.

6. Point for determination No.2-

7. There is on record, written admission of charge filed by the workman during the enquiry. In his statement of

claim also, workman has stated that he issued a certificate but on the instructions of the Manager. Hence, he

does not deny the issue of certificate for which he was not authorized. His claim that this certificate was issued

on instruction of Manager requires proof. The enquiry report itself states that no evidence was given by the

workman during enquiry nor did he cross-examined any of the witnesses. Hence on the basis of his admission

alone, the Enquiry Officer was fully justified in law and fact holding the charges against the workman proved.

On the basis of above discussion, the charges levelled against workman during the domestic enquiry are held

proved on the basis of his admission. Issue No.2 is answered accordingly.

8. Point for determination No.3-

9. The charge proved against workman is that he exceeded his jurisdiction and issued certificate which he was not

authorized and the punishment given for the charge is stoppage of 4 increments with retrospective effect. There

is nothing on record to show that this punishment is excessive. Particularly in the light of fact that there had

been complaints of wrong omissions and commissions and misconduct against the workman and also that he

did not improve even after the punishment and was compulsorily retired when he was found guilty for other

charges of misconduct. Hence it is held that the punishment imposed is not shockingly disproportionate so as

to warrant interference by this Tribunal. It should be kept in mind that this Tribunal is not an Appellate

Authority regarding the disciplinary proceedings.

10. Point for determinationNo.4-

11. On the basis of above discussion, applicant is not entitled to relief claimed by him.

12. In the result, award is passed as under:-

(1) The action of the management of General Manager (Operation), State Bank of Indore in stopping 4

annual increments with retrospective e effect in r/o Shri Narendra Shah, Daftari is justified.

(2) Workman is not entitled to any relief.

13. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.

Dated:25-3-2019

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 682-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 150@1999½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 25@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&20012@140@1999&vkbZvkj¼lh&1½]

,e- ds- Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019

S.O. 682.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad (Ref. No.

150 of 1999) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. BCCL and their

workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25.4.2019.

[No. L-20012/140/1999-IR(C-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

2758

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference : No. 150/1999

Employer in relation to the management of Katrash Area of M/S BCCL,

AND

Their workman

Present : Sri D.K. Singh, Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers:- Shri Rahul Kumar Mondal Dy. Manager

For the workman. :- Shri K.D.P.Yadav, President (NCWC)

State : Jharkhand.

Industry- Coal

Dated- 26/03/ 2019

AWARD

By order No. L-20012/140/1999-IR(C-I) dated 15/07/1999 the central Government in the Ministry of Labour

has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub–section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of BCCL in recording the age of 50 years as on 21.07.88 of Sri

Mahendra Singh, Pump Operator when his date of birth is 01.01.1949 in his service record is proper and

justified? If not, what direction is required in this respect and to what relief is the concerned workman

entitled?”

2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed and during the hearing of the case, Ld. President of

Sponsoring Union has informed that workman has not been interested in contesting the case. It is felt that the

workman has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence “No dispute” award is passed. communicate.

D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 683-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 151@1999½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 25@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&20012@587@1998&vkbZvkj¼lh&1½]

,e- ds- Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019

S.O. 683.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad (Ref. No.

151 of 1999) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. BCCL and their

workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25.4.2019.

[No. L-20012/587/1998-IR(C-1)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference : No. 150/1999

Employer in relation to the management of Bastacolla Area of M/s BCCL,

AND

Their workman

Present : Sri D.K. Singh, Presiding Officer.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2759

Appearances:

For the Employers:- None

For the workman. :- None

State : Jharkhand.

Industry- Coal

Dated : 25/03/ 2019

AWARD

By order No. L-20012/587/1998-IR(C-I) dated 06/07/1999 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour

has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of the Union to refer to Medical Board for determination of date of birth of Shri

Kapildeb Sharma, Night Guard under 1.1.76 (JBCCI) is justified? If yes, to what relief the workman is

entitled and from what date?”

2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed but both parties failed to appear before this Tribunal. Notices

were issued but even then none of the parties appeared. Case is pending since long. So, it appears that the workman has

lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence “No dispute” award is passed. Communicate.

D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 684-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 204@1999½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 25@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&20012@394@1999&vkbZvkj¼lh&1½]

,e- ds- Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019

S.O. 684.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad (Ref. No.

204 of 1999) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in srelation to the management

of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25.4.2019.

[No. L-20012/394/1999-IR(C-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference: No. 204/1999

Employer in relation to the management of P.B.Area of M/S.BCCL

AND

Their workman

Present : Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer.

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None

For the workman. :- None

State : Jharkhand

Industry- Coal

Dated- 27/03/ 2019

2760

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AWARD

By order No. L-20012/394/1999-IR(C-I) dated 02/12/1999, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour

has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of the Union from the management of Gopalichuk Colliery of M/S BCCL to

regularize Sri Ram Chet Beldar as an office clerk is proper and justified? If yes to what relief the

workman is entitled and from what date?”

2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed. The workmen appeared for certain dates, but subsequently

left appearing before this Tribunal. Case is pending since long. It appears that the workmen has lost his interest to

resolve the matter. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.

D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 685-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-

lh-lh-,y- izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 206@1999½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj

dks 25@4@2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA

[la- ,y&20012@371@1999&vkbZvkj¼lh&1½]

,e- ds- Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019

S.O. 685.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad (Ref. No.

206 of 1999) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. BCCL and their

workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25.4.2019.

[No. L-20012/371/1999-IR(C-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference: No. 206/1999

Employer in relation to the management of Govindpur Area of M/S. BCCL

AND

Their workman

Present : Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer.

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None

For the workman. :- None

State : Jharkhand.

Industry- Coal

Dated- 26/03/ 2019

AWARD

By order No. L-20012/371/1999-IR(C-I) dated 02/12/1999, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour

has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2761

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Govindpur Area No.III of M/S BCCL Dhanbad to deny

regularization of Sri Ram Karan Mistry Block IV as lamp issue clerk is just and proper ? If not to what

relief the workman is entitled?”

2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed but both parties failed to appear before this Tribunal.

Notices were issued but even then none of the parties appeared. Case is pending since long. so, it appears that the

workmen has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence “No Dispute” Award is passed. Communicate.

D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 686-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-

lh-lh-,y- izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 207@1999½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj

dks 25@4@2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA

[la- ,y&20012@373@1999&vkbZvkj ¼lh&1½]

,e- ds- Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019

S.O. 686.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad (Ref. No.

207 of 1999) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. BCCL and their

workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25.4.2019.

[No. L-20012/373/1999-IR(C-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference: No. 207/1999

Employer in relation to the management of Govindpur Area of M/S. BCCL

AND

Their workman.

Present : Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer.

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Shri D.K.Verma, Advocate

For the workman. :- None

State : Jharkhand.

Industry- Coal

Dated- 25/03/2019

AWARD

By order No. L-20012/373/1999-IR(C-I) dated 02/12/1999, the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour

has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of South Govindpur Colliery of Area No.III M/S BCCL

Dhanbad to deny regularization of Sri Jailal Mahato as underground munshi in clerical Gr.II with

protection of wages is just and proper? If not to what relief Shri Jailal Mahato is entitled?”

2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed. The workmen appeared for certain dates, but subsequently

left appearing before this Tribunal. The management remains present through lawyer. Case is pending since long. It

appears that the workmen has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence “No Dispute” Award is passed.

Communicate.

D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer

2762

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 687-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 208@2001½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@04@-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&20012@333@2001&vkbZvkj ¼lh-I½]

,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019

S.O. 687.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1 Dhanbad

(Ref. No. 208/2001) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25/04/2019.

[No. L-20012/333/2001-IR(C-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference: No. 208/2001

Employer in relation to the management of Barora.Area of M/S.BCCL

AND

Their workman

Present: Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer.

Appearances:

For the Employers : None

For the workman. : None

State : Jharkhand.

Industry- Coal

Dated- 28/03/2019

AWARD

By order No. L-20012/333/2001-IR(C-I) dated 21/09/2001, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in

exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub–section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of the National coal workers congress of BCCL, Barora Area-1 to promote/

regularize Sri Kashi Nath Gour as Exv. Gr.D in 01.01.92 to Gr.C in 01.01.97 and in Gr.B 01.01.2001

with payment of arrear salary is proper and justified? If yes, to what relief the workman is entitled ?

2.

After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed but both parties failed to appear before this Tribunal.

Shri S.C.Gour who had received the notice on behalf of workman has informed that workman is not interested in

contesting the case. Now the case is pending since long. so, it appears that the workmen has lost his interest to resolve

the matter. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.

D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 688-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 205@2001½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@04@-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FksA

[la- ,y&20012@145@2001&vkbZvkj ¼lh-I½]

,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2763

New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019

S.O. 688.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1 Dhanbad

(Ref. No. 205/2001) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25/04/2019.

[No. L-20012/145/2001-IR(C-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference: No. 205/2001

Employer in relation to the management of Jealgora Colliery of M/S.BCCL

AND

Their workman

Present : Shri D.K.Sing, Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers : None

For the workman. : None

State : Jharkhand.

Industry- Coal

Dated-26/03/2019

AWARD

By order No. L-20012/145/2001-IR(C-I) dated 18/09/2001, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour

has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the Demand of Colliery Karmchari Sangh from the management of Jealgora Colliery of

M/S. BCCL that Sri Shiv Shankar Singh is to be promote in Techinical Grade ‘C’ in Asstt.

Foreman(Auto) is proper and justified? If yes, to what relief is entitled the claimant entitled and which

date?”

2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed but both parties failed to appear before this Tribunal.

Notices were issued but even then none of the parties appeared. Case is pending since long. so, it appears that the

workmen has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence “No Dispute” Award is passed. Communicate.

D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 689-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 203@2001½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA

[la- ,y&20012@11@2001&vkbZvkj ¼lh-I½]

,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019

S.O. 689.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1 Dhanbad

(Ref. No. 203 of 2001) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25/04/2019.

[No. L-20012/11/2001-IR(C-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

2764

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference: No. 203/2001

Employer in relation to the management of North Tisra Colliery of M/S.BCCL

AND

Their workman

Present : Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers : Shri D.K.Verma, Advocate

For the workman. : None

State : Jharkhand.

Industry- Coal

Dated- 25/03/ 2019

AWARD

By order No. L-20012/11/2001-IR(C-I) dated 18/09/2001, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour

has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of the RCMS from the management of BCCL North Tisra Colliery for

regularizing Sri Yamuna Tiwari in Techinical Grade “C” from 1991 is justified? If so to what relief is

the workman entitled and from what date?”

2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed. The workmen appeared for certain dates, but subsequently

left appearing before this Tribunal. Notice were issued but even then none appeared on behalf of the workman. More

over one of the notices returned with endorsement “ Not Known”. The management remains present through lawyer.

Case is pending since long. It appears that the workmen has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence “No Dispute”

Award is passed. Communicate.

D. K.SINGH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 690-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 203@1999½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FkkA

[la- ,y&20012@390@1999&vkbZvkj ¼lh-I½]

,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019

S.O. 690.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1 Dhanbad

(Ref. No. 203/1999) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25/04/2019.

[No. L-20012/390/1999-IR(C-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference: No. 203/1999

Employer in relation to the management of P.B.Area of M/S.BCCL

AND

Their workman

Present : Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941

2765

Appearances:

For the Employers : None

For the workman. : None

State : Jharkhand.

Industry- Coal

Dated- 28/03/ 2019

AWARD

By order No. L-20012/390/1999-IR(C-I) dated 02/12/1999, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour

has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of the Union before the management of Gopalichuk Colliery under P.B.Area of

M/S BCCL to regularize S/Sri Raj Ballabh Paswan and Madan Kumar Sinha as Attendance clerk is

proper and justified ? If yes, to what relief the workman are entitled and from what date?”

2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed. The workmen appeared for certain dates, but

subsequently left appearing before this Tribunal. Case is pending since 13.12.1999. It appears that the workmen has lost

his interest to resolve the matter. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.

D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer

Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054. ALOK

KUMAR

Digitally signed

by ALOK KUMAR

Date: 2019.05.16

09:42:11 +05'30'