2204 GI/2019
(2565)
jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05
REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05
izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
lkIrkfgd
WEEKLY
la- 18]
ubZ fnYyh] vizSy 28—ebZ 4] 2019] 'kfuokj@oS'kk[k 8—oS'kk[k 14] 1941
No. 18]
NEW DELHI, APRIL 28—MAY 4, 2019, SATURDAY/VAISAKHA 8— VAISAKHA—14, 1941
bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)
Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a
Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India
(Other than the Ministry of Defence)
कामक
कामक
कामक
कामक, लोक िशकायत तथा पशन मंालय
लोक िशकायत तथा पशन मंालय
लोक िशकायत तथा पशन मंालय
लोक िशकायत तथा पशन मंालय
(कामक और िशण िवभाग)
(कामक और िशण िवभाग)
(कामक और िशण िवभाग)
(कामक और िशण िवभाग)
नई द ली, 25 अैल, 2019
का
का
का
का.आ.
.आ.
.आ.
.आ. 648
648
648
648.—के सरकार एतदारा द ली िवशेष पुिलस थापना अिधिनयम, 1946 (1946 का अिधिनयम सं! या 25) क#
धारा 6 के साथ प$ठत धारा 5 क# उपधारा (1) ारा द( शि)य* का योग करते -ए तिमलनाडू रा0 य सरकार गृह (पुिलस XIII)
िवभाग के शासक#य आदेश (Ms). सं. 174 दनांक 16.03.2019 के मा4 यम से ा5 त सहमित से भारतीय दंड संिहता (1860 का
के ीय अिधिनयम सं. XLV) क# धारा 354-ए, 354-बी तथा 392 व सूचना ौ<ोिगक# अिधिनयम, 2000, (2000 का के ीय
अिधिनयम सं. 21) क# धारा 66-ई तथा तिमलनाडू मिहला उBपीड़न िनषेध अिधिनयम, 1998 (1998 का तिमलनाडू अिधिनयम 44)
अपराध सं!या 59/2019 तथा भारतीय दंड संिहता (1860 का के ीय अिधिनयम सं. XLV) क# धारा 341, 294 (बी), 323, 324
एवं 506 भाग-2 के अंतगGत, अपराध सं!या 60/2019 मH िजला कोयJबटूर, पोलाची पूवM पुिलस थाना मH दजG मामले क# जांच करने के
िलए द ली िवशेष पुिलस थापना के सद य* क# शि)य* और OेPािधकार का सम त तिमलनाडू रा0 य मH िव तार करती है ।
[फा. सं. 228/06/2019–एवीडी-II]
एस.पी.आर. िP पाठी, अवर सिचव
2566
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS
(Department of Personnel and Training)
New Delhi, the 25th April, 2019
S.O. 648.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the
Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of State
Government of Tamil Nadu, Home (Police XIII) Department, vide Government Order G.O.(Ms).No. 174 dated
16.03.2019, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment in
the whole of the State of Tamil Nadu to investigate the case registered in Coimbatore District, Pollachi East Police
Station Crime No.59/2019 under sections 354-A, 354-B and 392 of Indian Penal Code (Central Act XLV of 1860)
and section 66-E of Information Technology Act, 2000 (Central Act 21 of 2000) and section 4 of Tamil Nadu
Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 1998 (Tamil Nadu Act 44 of 1998) and Crime No.60/2019 under sections
341, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506 Part 2 of Indian Penal Code (Central Act XLV of 1860).
[F. No. 228/06/2019-AVD-II]
S.P.R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.
िवुत
िवुत
िवुत
िवुत मंालय
मंालय
मंालय
मंालय
नई दली, 8 अैल, 2019
का
का
का
का. आ.
. आ.
. आ.
. आ. 649
649
649
649.—कH ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासक#य योजन* के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उप-
िनयम (4) के अनुसरण मH िव<ुत मंPालय के शासिनक िनयंPणाधीन पावरिRड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंिडया िलिमटेड के िनJ निलिखत
कायाGलय* िजनके 80 ितशत कमGचारीवृंद ने Tहदी का कायGसाधक Uान ाV कर िलया है, को एतदारा अिधसूिचत करती है:-
1. पावर िRड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंिडया िलिमटेड,
400/220 केवी पावगड़ा उपकH ,
Wयातंग-चेलूG गांव, वHकटमनाहली-पोट,
पावगड़ा, िजला तुमकूर, कनाGटक-572136
2. पावर िRड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंिडया िलिमटेड,
765/400/220 केवी उपकH ,
वसंतनरसापुरा इंडिZयल ए$रया-2 व 3,
कHपनाडो[ेरी (पोट), कोराहो\ली,
तुमकूर तालुक व िजला, कनाGटक-572128
3. पावर िRड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंिडया िलिमटेड,
कुडगी 765/400 केवी जीआईएस उपकH ,
बीजापुर-अलमाटी रा^ीय राजमागG-50 का 275 कमी टोन,
बसवनबागेवाड़ी तालुक, बीजापुर-586121
[सं. 11011/9/2017-Tहदी]
राज पाल, आ_थक सलाहकार
MINISTRY OF POWER
New Delhi, the 8th April, 2019
S.O. 649.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the
Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notify the following offices of the Power Grid Corporation of India
Ltd. under the administrative control of Ministry of Power, where 80% of the staff have acquired working knowledge of
Hindi:
1. Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.,
400/220 KV Pavagada sub-station,
Kyatagancherlu Village, Venkatamanahalli-Post,
Pavagada-Taluk, Tumkur District, Karnataka -572136
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2567
2. Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.,
765/400/220 KV Substation,
Vasantanarsapura Industrial Area-2 & 3,
Kempanadodderi (post), Kora hobli,
Tumkur (TQ and Dt), Karnataka-572128
3. Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.,
Kudgi 765/400 KV GIS Substation,
275 km stone on Bijapur-Almati NH-50,
Basavanbagewadi Taluk, Bijapur-586121
[No.11011/9/2017-Hindi]
RAJ PAL, Economic Adviser
पेोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंालय
पेोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंालय
पेोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंालय
पेोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंालय
नई दली, 3 अैल, 2019
का
का
का
का. आ.
. आ.
. आ.
. आ. 650
650
650
650.—के ीय सरकार ने पेZोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाईन (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजGन) अिधिनयम
1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमH इसके पaात् उ) अिधिनयम कहा गया हc) क# धारा 3 क# उप-धारा (1) के अधीन जारी क# गई
भारत सरकार के पेZोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंPालय क# अिधसूचना सं!या का.आ. 1373 तारीख 5 िसतJबर 2018 जो भारत के
राजपP, कािशत क# गई थी ारा उस अिधसूचना से संलd अनुसूची मH िविनeदf भूिम मH महारा^ रा0य मH िजला नािसक मH तालुका
मालेगांव कोयली - अहमदनगर - सोलापुर पेZोिलयम प$रवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपiरेशन िलिमटेड ारा पाइपलाईन िबछाने के
योजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार के अजGन के अपने आशय क# घोषणा क# थी ;
और उ) राजपP अिधिनयम क# ितयां जनता को तारीख 01 दसJबर, 2018 तक उपल\ध करा दी गई थी ;
और सOम ािधकारी ने उ) अिधिनयम क# धारा 6 क# उप-धारा (1) के अधीन के ीय सरकार को $रपोटG क# है ;
और के ीय सरकार ने, , , , उ) $रपोटG पर िवचार करने के पaात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर क उ) भूिम पाइपलाईन िबछाने
के िलए अपेिOत है, , , , उसमH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजGन करने का िविनaय कया है ;
अतः अब, , , , के ीय सरकार उ) अिधिनयम क# धारा 6 क# उप-धारा (1) ारा l( शि)य* का योग करते -ए यह घोषणा
करती है क इस अिधसूचना से संलd अनुसूची मH िविनeदf भूिम मH पाइपलाईन िबछाने के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अजGन कया
जाए ;
और सरकार उ) अिधिनयम क# धारा 6 क# उप-धारा (4) ारा l( शि)य* का योग करते -ए, , , , यह िनदmश देती है क उ)
भूिम मH उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के काशन क# तारीख से के ीय सरकार मH िनिहत होने के बजाए, , , , सभी िवलंगम* से मु)
होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपiरेशन िलिमटेड मH िनिहत होगी ।
पेZोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाईन अिधिनयम, 1962 क# धारा 10 के अधीन कसी भी Oितपू_त के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल
कॉपiरेशन िलिमटेड पूणGतया उ(रदायी होगी और पाइपलाईन से सJबिधत कसी भी मामले पर के ीय सरकार के िवop कोई वाद दावा
या कानूनी कायGवाही नहq हो सकेगी।
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
तालुका
तालुका
तालुका
तालुका -मालेगां
मालेगां
मालेगां
मालेगांव
िजला
िजला
िजला
िजला - नािसक
नािसक
नािसक
नािसक
राय
राय
राय
राय - महारा
महारा
महारा
महारा
मौजे/$ाम
मौजे/$ाम
मौजे/$ाम
मौजे/$ाम
सव%/&लॉक/सं ()लॉट सं)
सव%/&लॉक/सं ()लॉट सं)
सव%/&लॉक/सं ()लॉट सं)
सव%/&लॉक/सं ()लॉट सं)
सब
सब
सब
सब-िडव
िडव
िडव
िडव-संसंसंसं
,ेफल
,ेफल
,ेफल
,ेफल
हे.टेयर
हे.टेयर
हे.टेयर
हे.टेयर
आर
आर
आर
आर
वग/ मीटर
वग/ मीटर
वग/ मीटर
वग/ मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
जलगांव (Tनबयती)
87
00
21
39
86
00
28
14
82
00
46
16
84
00
04
33
81
00
11
38
80
00
52
80
79
00
34
51
74
00
31
48
2568
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
72
00
24
63
65
00
26
81
590
00
11
34
591
00
03
68
589
00
29
73
593
00
25
16
595
00
12
11
599
00
07
18
598
00
21
09
597
00
34
16
579
00
41
21
578
00
22
23
552
00
49
11
553
00
34
58
559
00
09
22
558
00
08
18
520
00
08
37
519
00
51
33
517
00
32
81
516
00
15
89
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/6/2018-ओ-आर-I/ई-23678]
शातनु धर, अवर सिचव
MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
New Delhi, the 3rd April, 2019
S. O. 650.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural
Gas vide S.O. No. 1373 dated the 5th September, 2018, issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and
Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government declared its
intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of
laying Koyali-Ahmednagar-Solapur Pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Products in Taluka Malegaon in
Nashik District in the State of Maharashtra by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to
01st December 2018;
And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of said act submitted report to the
Central Government;
And Whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land
is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is
hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby directs that right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the
Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all
encumbrances.
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2569
Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the
P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter
relating to the pipeline.
SCHEDULE
Taluka:- Malegaon
District:- Nashik
State :- Maharashtra
Mauje / Village
Survey/ Block
No.
Sub-Div-No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Jalgaon (Nimbait)
87
00
21
39
86
00
28
14
82
00
46
16
84
00
04
33
81
00
11
38
80
00
52
80
79
00
34
51
74
00
31
48
72
00
24
63
65
00
26
81
590
00
11
34
591
00
03
68
589
00
29
73
593
00
25
16
595
00
12
11
599
00
07
18
598
00
21
09
597
00
34
16
579
00
41
21
578
00
22
23
552
00
49
11
553
00
34
58
559
00
09
22
558
00
08
18
520
00
08
37
519
00
51
33
517
00
32
81
516
00
15
89
[F. No. R-11025(11)/6/2018-OR-I/E-23678]
SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.
नई दली, 22 अैल, 2019
का
का
का
का. आ.
. आ.
. आ.
. आ. 651
651
651
651.—पेZोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भू-उपयोग अिधकार अिधRहण) अिधिनयम 1962 (1962 के 50) के
खrड 2 क# धारा(क) के अनुसरण मH तथा पेZोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंPालय मH भारत सरकार क# दनांक 21-5-2012 क# अिधसूचना
का॰आ॰1781 का अिधsमण करते -ए, कH सरकार एतtारा ,डी5टी िजला कलेW टर (नजफ़गढ़), रा^ीय राजधानी OेP दली को अपने
कतGu* के अित$र) रा^ीय राजधानी OेP दली क# सीमा मे Tहदुतान पेZोिलयम कॉपiरेशन िलिमटेड क# एमडीपीएल उBपाद
पाइपलाइन के अंग के vप मH बहादुरगढ़ – $टक$रकलां परलाइंस के िलए उ) अिधिनयम के तहत सOम ािधकारी के vप मH कायG करने
के िलए ािधकृत करती है ।
[फा. सं. आर-11025(15)/2/2019-ओआर-I/ई-29584]
शातनु धर, अवर सिचव
2570
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 22nd April, 2019
S. O. 651.—In pursuance of clause (a) of section 2 of Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right
of user in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) and in suppression of notification of the Government of India in Ministry of
Petroleum and Natural Gas No. S.O. 1781 dated 21-05-2012, the Central Government hereby authorizes, SDM
(Najafgarh) Government of NCT Delhi, to perform the functions of Competent Authority for Bahadurgarh Tikrikalan
spurlines as part of MDPL product Pipeline of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited in addition to his/her own
duties, under the said Act, within the territory of NCT Delhi.
[F. No. R-11025(15)/2/2019-OR-I/E-29584]
SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.
नई द ली, 23 अैल, 2019
का
का
का
का.आ.
.आ.
.आ.
.आ. 652
652
652
652.—के ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासक#य योजन* के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उपिनयम
(4) के अनुसरण मH पेZोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंPालय के शासिनक िनयंPणाधीन सावGजिनक OेP के उपsम* के िनJ निलिखत
कायाGलय* को, िजनके 80 या अिधक ितशत कमGचारी वृ द ने िह दी का कायGसाधक Uान ा5 त कर िलया है, अिधसूिचत करती है:-
1. भारत पेZोिलयम कॉपiरेशन िलिमटेड, रायपुर,
एल.पी.जी. बॉटTलग 5लांट, Rाम – खपरी,
तहसील - ितदा, िजला – रायपुर,
िपन – 493116
[सं. 11011/1/2017(िह दी)]
ऊषा िबजोला, संयुW त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)
New Delhi, the 23rd April, 2019
S.O. 652.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for official purpose of the
Unoin) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices of the Public Sector Undertakings
under the administrative control of the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, in which 80 or more per cent of the staff
have acquired working Knowledge of Hindi :-
1. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Raipur
LPG Bottling Plant, Village - Khapari,
Tahsil – Tilda, District – Raipur,
PIN - 493116
[No. 11011/1/2017(Hindi)]
USHA BINJOLA, Jt. Director (OL)
नई द ली, 23 अैल, 2019
का
का
का
का. आ.
. आ.
. आ.
. आ. 653
653
653
653.—के ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासक#य योजन* के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के
उपिनयम (4) के अनुसरण मH पेZोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंPालय के शासिनक िनयंPणाधीन सावGजिनक OेP के उपsम* के
िनJ निलिखत कायाGलय* को, िजनके 80 या अिधक ितशत कमGचारी वृ द ने िह दी का कायGसाधक Uान ा5 त कर िलया है, अिधसूिचत
करती है :-
s.सं.
कायाGलय/लोकेशन का नाम
1.
तलोजा यूब कॉJ5लेWस
इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपiरेशन िलिमटेड,
िवशेषता यूब और योजक प$रसर,
5लॉट सं. टी – 20, एमआईडीसी, तलोजा
नवी मुंबई – 410208 (महारा^)
2.
वडोदरा एलपीजी ट_मनल,
इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपiरेशन िलिमटेड,
वडोदरा – सावली रोड, पोट – दुमाड,
वडोदरा – 391749
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2571
3.
मुंबई मrडल कायाGलय,
इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपiरेशन िलिमटेड,
साजGन 5लाज़ा,
100, डा. एनी बेसंट रोड, वलM,
मुंबई – 400018
[सं. 11011/1/2017 (िह दी)]
ऊषा िबजोला, संयुक् त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)
New Delhi, the 23rd April, 2019
S.O. 653.—In pursuance of Sub Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for official purpose of the
Unoin) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices of the Public Sector Undertakings
under the administrative control of the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, in which 80 or more percent of the staff
have acquired working Knowledge of Hindi :-
Sl. No.
Name of Office/Location
1.
Taloja Lube Complex
Indian Oil Corporation Limited Visheshata Lube aur Yojak Parisar,
Plot No. T-20, MIDC, Taloja
Navi Mumbai – 410208 (Maharashtra)
2.
Vadodara LPG Terminal,
Indian Oil Corporation Limited Vadodara Sawali Road, Post – Dumad,
Vadodara-391749
3.
Mumbai Circle Office,
Indian Oil Corporation Limited,
Sarzan Plaza,
100, Dr. Ani Besent Road, Worli,
Mumbai - 400018
[No. 11011/1/2017(Hindi)]
USHA BINJOLA, Jt. Director (OL)
नई द ली, 29 अैल, 2019
का
का
का
का. आ.
. आ.
. आ.
. आ. 654
654
654
654.—पेZोिलयम एवं खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजGन)अिधिनयम, 1962, (1962 का
50) (इसमH इसके बाद उ) अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क# धारा 2 के खंड (क) के अनुसरण मH, भारत के असाधारण राजपP सं!या 370,
दनांक 13.02.2017 मH कािशत, भारत सरकार के पेZोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंPालय क# अिधसूचना का. आ. सं!या 406 (अ),
दनांक 08.02.2017 मH, भारत सरकार एतदारा, संशोधन करती है तथा आंy देश रा0य मH इंिडयन ऑयल कॉरपोरेशन िलिमटेड क#
पारादीप हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन प$रयोजना के िलए पेZोिलयम एवं खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मH उपयोग के अिधकार का अजGन)
अिधिनयम, 1962 के तहत zी बी. वHकटेशु को zी एम. आर.आर. शेषु के थान पर सOम ािधकारी के काय{ का िनवGहन करने के िलए
ािधकृत करती है।
यह अिधसूचना जारी होने क# तारीख से लागू होगी ।
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]
शातनु धर, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019
S. O. 654.—In pursuance of clause (a) of Section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of
Right of user in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962), (hereinafter called the said Act), Government hereby, makes the
amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas. S.O. No 406
(E) dated 08.02.2017, published in the Extra Ordinary Gazette of India No. 370 dated 13.02.2017 and authorizes
Shri B. Venkatesu vice Shri M.R.R. Seshu to perform the functions of Competent Authority under the Petroleum and
Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in Land) Act, 1962 for Paradip Hyderabad Pipeline Project of Indian
Oil Corporation Limited in the state of Andhra Pradesh.
This notification is applicable from the date of issue.
[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]
SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.
2572
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कोयला मंालय
कोयला मंालय
कोयला मंालय
कोयला मंालय
नई दली, 26 अैल, 2019
का
का
का
का.आ. 655
. 655
. 655
. 655.—के ीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक OेP (अजGन और िवकास) अिधिनयम, 1957 (1957 का 20) ( िजसे इसमH
इसके पaात् उ) अिधिनयम कहा गया है ) क# धारा 4 क# उप-धारा (1) के अधीन भारत सरकार के कोयला मंPालय ारा जारी क#
गई अिधसूचना सं!यांक का. आ. 1704(अ), तारीख 10 मई,
2016 , जो भारत के राजपP, असाधारण, भाग ।।, खंड 3, उप
-
खंड
(ii),
तारीख 11 मई,
201 6 मH कािशत क# गई थी, उस अिधसूचना से उपाबp अनुसूची मH िविनeदf प$रOेP क# भूिम मH िजसका माप
912.7892 हेWटेयर (लगभग) या 2255.502 एकड़ (लगभग) है, कोयले का पूवmOण करने के अपने आशय क# सूचना दी थी और उ)
सूचना 10 मई, 2018 से ारंभ होने वाली एक वषG क# और अविध को, अिधसूचना सं!या 1651(अ), तारीख 17 अैल,2018 मH
अिधसूिचत क# गई थी ;
और, के ीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है क इस अिधसूचना से संलd अनुसूची मH िविहत उ) भूिम के भाग से
कोयला अिभा5य कया जा सकता है ।
अत:, अब, के ीय सरकार, उ) अिधिनयम क# धारा 7 क# उप-धारा (1) ारा द( शि)य* का योग करते -ए, इससे
संलd अनुसूची मH िविनeदf 912.799 हेWटेयर (लगभग) या 2255.575 एकड़ (लगभग) माप वाली भूिम मH या उस पर के सभी
अिधकार का अजGन करने के अपने आशय क# सूचना देती है ।
1ट)पण
1ट)पण
1ट)पण
1ट)पण 1 : : : : इस अिधसूचना के अधीन आने वाले OेP के रेखांक सं!यांक एससीसीएल/नैनी OेP /अिधसूचना/2018/1, तारीख
28 दसJबर, 2018 का िनरीOण महा बंधक, नैनी OेP, द Tसगरेनी कोिलयरीज़ कंपनी िलिमटेड (एक सरकारी कंपनी), एनएसी का
एच. सं!या 129, िमzापाड़ा, िजला अंगुल-759122, ओिडशा या कोयला िनयंPक, 1, काउंिसल हाउस Zीट, कोलकाता - 700001
के कायाGलय मH या कलेWटर और िजला मिजZेट, िजला अंगुल, ओिडशा के कायाGलय मH कया जा सकता है ।
1ट)पण
1ट)पण
1ट)पण
1ट)पण 2 :
2 :
2 :
2 : उ) अिधिनयम क# धारा 8 के उपबंध* क# ओर 4यान आकृf कया जाता है, िजसमH अजGन क# आपि(य* के संबंध मH
िन}िलिखत उपबंध है :-
‘’8.
)
1
(
कोई uि), जो कसी भूिम मH, िजसक# बाबत धारा 7 के अधीन अिधसूचना जारी क# गई है, िहतबp है, अिधसूचना
जारी कए जाने से तीस दन के भीतर सJ पूणG भूिम या उसके कसी भाग या ऐसी भूिम मH या उस पर के कहq अिधकार* का
अजGन कए जाने के संबंध मH आपि( कर सकेगा ।
3प4ीकरण
3प4ीकरण
3प4ीकरण
3प4ीकरण.- इस धारा के अथातगGत यह आपि( नहq मानी जाएगी, क कोई uि) कसी भूिम मH कोयला उBपादन के िलए वयं खनन
संsयाएं करना चाहता है और ऐसी संsयाएं के ीय सरकार या कसी अय uि) को नहq करनी चािहए ।
(2) उप-धारा (1) के अधीन Bयेक आपि( सOम अिधकारी को िलिखत vप मH क# जाएगी और सOम अिधकारी, आपि(कताG को
वयं सुने जाने का या िविध uवसायी ारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसी सभी आपि(य* को सुनने के पaात् और ऐसी
अित$र) जांच, यद कोई हो, करने के पaात् , जो वह आवयक समझता है, वह या तो धारा 7 क# उपधारा (1) के अधीन
अिधसूिचत भूिम के या ऐसी भूिम मH या उस पर के अिधकार* के संबंध मH एक $रपोटG या ऐसी भूिम के िविभ टुकड़* या ऐसी भूिम मH
या उस पर के अिधकार* के संबंध मH आपि(य* पर अपनी िसफा$रश* और उसके ारा क# गई कायGवाही के अिभलेख सिहत िविभ
$रपोट के ीय सरकार को उसके िविनaय के िलए देगा ।
(3) इस धारा के योजन* के िलए वह uि) कसी भूिम मH िहतबp समझा जाएगा जो ितकर मH िहत का दावा करने का हकदार
होता, यद भूिम या ऐसी भूिम मH या उस पर के अिधकार इस अिधिनयम के अधीन अ_जत कर िलए जाते ।‘’
1ट)पण
1ट)पण
1ट)पण
1ट)पण 3 : : : : के ीय सरकार ने कोयला िनयंPक 1, काउंिसल हाउस Zीट, कोलकाता - 700001 को उ) अिधिनयम क# धारा 3 के
अधीन अिधसूचना सं!या का. आ. 3347(अ), तारीख 9 दसJबर, 2015, जो भारत के राजपP, भाग ।।, खंड 3, उप
-
खंड
(ii), मH
10 दसJबर, 2015 को कािशत क# गयी थी, ारा सOम ािधकारी िनयु) कया है ।
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2573
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
अनुसूची
5स
5स
5स
5सगरेनी कोिलयरीज़ कंपनी िलिमटेड
गरेनी कोिलयरीज़ कंपनी िलिमटेड
गरेनी कोिलयरीज़ कंपनी िलिमटेड
गरेनी कोिलयरीज़ कंपनी िलिमटेड
नैनी ओपनका3ट प1रयोजना
नैनी ओपनका3ट प1रयोजना
नैनी ओपनका3ट प1रयोजना
नैनी ओपनका3ट प1रयोजना, , , , नैनी ,े
नैनी ,े
नैनी ,े
नैनी ,े
िजला अंगुल
िजला अंगुल
िजला अंगुल
िजला अंगुल, , , , ओिडशा
ओिडशा
ओिडशा
ओिडशा
[रेखांक सं8यांक
रेखांक सं8यांक
रेखांक सं8यांक
रेखांक सं8यांक एससीसीएल/नैनी ,े /अिधसूचना/2018/1
एससीसीएल/नैनी ,े /अिधसूचना/2018/1
एससीसीएल/नैनी ,े /अिधसूचना/2018/1
एससीसीएल/नैनी ,े /अिधसूचना/2018/1,तारीख
तारीख
तारीख
तारीख 28 BदसDबर
BदसDबर
BदसDबर
BदसDबर, , , , 201
201
201
2018
8
8
8 ] ] ] ]
(I)
(I)
(I)
(I)
सारणी
सारणी
सारणी
सारणी
.सं.
ाम का नाम
थाना
थाना
संया िजला
भूिम का कार (हेटेयर म)
जोड़,
हेटेयर म
जोड़, एकड़ म
टपिणयां
अिभधृित
वन
गैर-वन
सरकारी
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
1
कासीडीहा
छदीपादा 95
अंगुल 0.961
9.805
0.750
11.516
28.457
भाग
2
त"तुलोई
गोपीनाथपुर
छदीपादा 94
अंगुल -
1.461
0.654
2.115
5.226
भाग
3
थलीपसी
छदीपादा 101
अंगुल 20.555
4.207
3.052
27.814
68.730
भाग
4
िब(बाधारापुर छदीपादा 102
अंगुल 35.724
51.101
8.873
95.698
236.475
पूण*
5
कुडापासी
छदीपादा 103
अंगुल 42.488
56.744
1.716
100.948
249.448
भाग
6
धौराखमान
छदीपादा 104
अंगुल 12.099
16.862
2.652
31.613
78.117
भाग
7
छदीपादा
आरि,त वन
छदीपादा -
अंगुल 0.000
643.095
0.000
643.095
1589.122
भाग
जोड़ :
111.827
783.275
17.697
912.799
2255.575
जोड़ : 912.799 हेटेयर (लगभग) या 2255.575 एकड़ (लगभग )
1. Rाम कासीडीहा मH अ_जत कए जाने वाले 5लाट सं!यांक:
1 से 16, 17(भाग), 20(भाग), 23(भाग), 24(भाग), 25 से 29, 30(भाग), 31, 32(भाग), 33(भाग), 34(भाग), 36(भाग),
3092(भाग), 3138, 3176.
2. Rाम ततुलोई गोपीनाथपुर मH अ_जत कए जाने वाले 5लॉट सं!याक:
193(भाग), 194(भाग), 195(भाग), 196 से 199, 200(भाग), 201(भाग).
3. Rाम थलीपसी मH अ_जत कए जाने वाले 5लॉट सं!यांक:
1 से 17, 18(भाग), 19(भाग), 20(भाग), 52(भाग), 53 से 62, 63(भाग), 64(भाग), 66(भाग), 67, 68(भाग), 69 से 118,
119(भाग), 120(भाग), 229(भाग), 233(भाग), 234(भाग), 235, 236, 237(भाग), 238(भाग), 239, 240, 241(भाग),
242(भाग), 243, 244, 245(भाग), 247(भाग), 250(भाग), 251 से 431, 432(भाग), 433(भाग), 434(भाग), 436(भाग),
437(भाग), 449(भाग), 471(भाग), 472(भाग), 473, 474, 475, 476(भाग), 477 से 545, 546(भाग), 547(भाग), 548(भाग),
549, 550(भाग), 551(भाग), 552(भाग), 553(भाग), 561(भाग), 565, 566, 568, 569, 570, 576, 577, 578, 579, 580,
581, 582, 583.
4. Rाम िबJबाधारापुर मH अ_जत कए जाने वाले 5लॉट सं!यांक:
1 से 437.
5. Rाम कुडापासी मH अ_जत कए जाने वाले 5लाट सं!यांक:
1 से 460, 461(भाग), 462(भाग), 463 से 466, 467(भाग), 492(भाग), 499(भाग), 500(भाग), 501 से 522, 523(भाग),
527(भाग), 528, 529(भाग), 530(भाग), 531(भाग), 532 से 630, 631(भाग), 632(भाग), 633(भाग), 634(भाग), 635(भाग),
636 से 677, 678(भाग), 679(भाग), 680(भाग), 681(भाग), 682(भाग), 685(भाग), 686(भाग), 687(भाग), 688, 689(भाग),
690, 691(भाग), 692(भाग), 737(भाग), 738, 739, 740, 741(भाग), 769(भाग), 770 से 783, 784(भाग), 795(भाग),
796(भाग), 797(भाग), 802(भाग), 803(भाग), 804, 805, 806, 807(भाग), 809(भाग), 955(भाग), 956(भाग), 1223,
1224(भाग), 1225 से 1231, 1233 से 1297, 1300 से 1311, 1314, 1316 से 1322, 1324 से 1331, 1333 से 1363.
2574
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
6. Rाम धराखमान मH अ_जत कए जाने वाले 5लाट सं!यांक:
1 से 19, 20(भाग), 21(भाग), 22 से 52, 53(भाग), 54(भाग), 84(भाग), 85(भाग), 86 से 101, 102(भाग), 103, 104,
105(भाग), 176(भाग), 178(भाग), 179(भाग), 180(भाग), 181(भाग), 182 से 212, 213(भाग), 214 से 221, 222(भाग),
223(भाग), 224(भाग), 225(भाग), 226(भाग), 255(भाग), 256(भाग), 257(भाग), 258, 259, 260(भाग), 261, 262(भाग),
265(भाग), 266(भाग), 267, 268(भाग), 269(भाग), 270(भाग), 550 से 553, 558 से 563, 566, 567, 570 से 572, 574,
575, 578 से 582, 584, 587 से 592, 595, 596, 598, 599, 600, 605, 607, 612, 614.
(7)
(7)
(7)
(7) छHदीपादा आरिOत वन: 643.095 हेWटेयर या 643.095 एकड़
अ_जत क# जाने वाली भूिम का िववरण नीचे सारणी मH दया गया है:-
(II)
(II)
(II)
(II) सारणी
सारणी
सारणी
सारणी
(1) Rाम – कासीडीहा
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी)
s.सं.
आर.I सeकल/
Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर
मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
1
कासीडीहा
44
3
चौधुरी धान सुपुP लखई धान व अय
तैला
0.136
2
कासीडीहा
73
4
दसारथी सा- सुपुP पदमलवा सा- व
अय
तैला
0.176
3
कासीडीहा
167
5
महे वर सा- सुपुP दसारथी सा- व अय
तैला
0.201
4
कासीडीहा
44
9
चौधुरी धान सुपुP लखई धान व अय
पतीता
0.090
5
कासीडीहा
44
10
चौधुरी धान सुपुP लखई धान व अय
पतीता
0.041
6
कासीडीहा
44
11
चौधुरी धान सुपुP लखई धान व अय
पतीता
0.317
जोड़
जोड़
जोड़
जोड़ : : : :
$ाम
$ाम
$ाम
$ाम : : : : कासीडीहा
कासीडीहा
कासीडीहा
कासीडीहा
0.961
0.961
0.961
0.961
(2) Rाम – थलीपसी
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी)
s.सं.
आर.I
सeकल/
Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर
मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
1
थलीपसी
8
2
िखरमोहन सा सुपुP जोगे सा और अय
तैला
0.607
2
थलीपसी
46/5
3
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबणु चरण सा
तैला
0.133
3
थलीपसी
45
4
सुदशGन नायक सुपुP दबाकर और अय
पतीता
0.061
4
थलीपसी
45
5
सुदशGन नायक सुपुP दबाकर और अय
तैला
0.178
5
थलीपसी
21
6
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहया सा और अय
पतीता
0.101
6
थलीपसी
21
7
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहया सा और अय
पतीता
0.174
7
थलीपसी
21
8
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहया सा और अय
तैला
0.243
8
थलीपसी
21
9
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहया सा और अय
तैला
0.174
9
थलीपसी
21
10
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहया सा और अय
पतीता
0.049
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2575
10
थलीपसी
43
12
संतकुमार सा सुपुP सुकv सा और अय
पतीता
0.118
11
थलीपसी
43
13
संतकुमार सा सुपुP सुकv सा और अय
पतीता
0.510
12
थलीपसी
43
14
संतकुमार सा सुपुP सुकv सा और अय
पतीता
0.049
13
थलीपसी
14
15
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालव सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
दो फसली
0.542
14
थलीपसी
14
16
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालव सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
दो फसली
0.257
15
थलीपसी
14
17
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालव सा और अय
पतीता
0.047
16
थलीपसी
14
18
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालव सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
दो फसली
0.198
17
थलीपसी
14
19
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालव सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
दो फसली
0.003
18
थलीपसी
21
52
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहया सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.067
19
थलीपसी
21
53
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहया सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.105
20
थलीपसी
21
54
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहया सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.105
21
थलीपसी
21
55
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहया सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.032
22
थलीपसी
21
56
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहया सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.026
23
थलीपसी
21
57
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहया सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.031
24
थलीपसी
21
58
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहया सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.039
25
थलीपसी
21
59
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहया सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.033
26
थलीपसी
21
60
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहया सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.040
27
थलीपसी
21
61
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहया सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.028
28
थलीपसी
21
62
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहया सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.038
29
थलीपसी
21
63
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहया सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.028
30
थलीपसी
17
64
डालगोब*डा माझी सुपुP मौलमानी माझी
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.106
31
थलीपसी
7
66
केसाबा सा सुपुP जोगई सा और अय
तैला
0.028
32
थलीपसी
7
67
केसाबा सा सुपुP जोगई सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.122
2576
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
33
थलीपसी
7
68
केसाबा सा सुपुP जोगई सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.043
34
थलीपसी
7
69
केसाबा सा सुपुP जोगई सा और अय
तैला
0.046
35
थलीपसी
7
70
केसाबा सा सुपुP जोगई सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.051
36
थलीपसी
7
71
केसाबा सा सुपुP जोगई सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.091
37
थलीपसी
7
72
केसाबा सा सुपुP जोगई सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.054
38
थलीपसी
7
73
केसाबा सा सुपुP जोगई सा और अय
तैला
0.040
39
थलीपसी
13
74
जोगी सा सुपुP बंछा सा
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.091
40
थलीपसी
7
75
केसाबा सा सुपुP जोगई सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.178
41
थलीपसी
7
76
केसाबा सा सुपुP जोगई सा और अय
तैला
0.091
42
थलीपसी
20
79
नु-रा सा सुपुP मैगुनी सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.199
43
थलीपसी
20
80
नु-रा सा सुपुP मैगुनी सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.059
44
थलीपसी
38
81
बुिधया माझी सुपुP नाबागाना माझी
तैला
0.221
45
थलीपसी
20
87
नु-रा सा सुपुP मैगुनी सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.460
46
थलीपसी
20
88
नु-रा सा सुपुP मैगुनी सा और अय
पतीता
0.053
47
थलीपसी
6
91
का सा सुपुP आरता सा
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.040
48
थलीपसी
6
92
का सा सुपुP आरता सा
तैला
0.247
49
थलीपसी
27
95
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान और
अय
तैला
0.353
50
थलीपसी
32
96
िबsम धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान और अय ।
तैला
0.412
51
थलीपसी
25
97
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.015
52
थलीपसी
25
98
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.012
53
थलीपसी
25
99
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.024
54
थलीपसी
25
100
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.025
55
थलीपसी
46/6
101
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.072
56
थलीपसी
30
102
िबsम धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान और अय
तैला
0.190
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2577
57
थलीपसी
33
103
भागाबत गोसा सुपुP जदुनाथ धान और
अय
तैला
0.031
58
थलीपसी
46/4
105
जसबंत धान सुपुP जोगीनाथ धान और
अय
घाराबरी
0.117
59
थलीपसी
9
106
िग$रश च ा धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
घाराबरी
0.119
60
थलीपसी
25
107
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
घाराबरी
0.103
61
थलीपसी
44
108
सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.022
62
थलीपसी
46/6
109
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.022
63
थलीपसी
37
110
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.022
64
थलीपसी
30
111
िबsम धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान और
अय
तैला
0.158
65
थलीपसी
6
112
कान सा सुपुP अराता सा
घाराबरी
0.146
66
थलीपसी
22
115
पािडया सा सुपुP निहया सा और अय
घाराबरी
0.087
67
थलीपसी
6
116
कान सा सुपुP अराता सा
घाराबरी
0.077
68
थलीपसी
21
117
पािडया सा सुपुP निहया सा और अय
घाराबरी
0.102
69
थलीपसी
21
118
पािडया सा सुपुP निहया सा और अय
घाराबरी
0.090
70
थलीपसी
25
233
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.002
71
थलीपसी
39
234
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारान धान और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.111
72
थलीपसी
39
235
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारान धान और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.104
73
थलीपसी
15
236
दबाकर धान सुपुP िनBयानंदा
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.052
74
थलीपसी
39
237
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.057
75
थलीपसी
39
238
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.037
76
थलीपसी
39
239
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.056
77
थलीपसी
39
240
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.026
78
थलीपसी
39
241
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.022
79
थलीपसी
39
242
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.013
80
थलीपसी
39
243
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.052
2578
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
81
थलीपसी
39
244
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.045
82
थलीपसी
15
245
दबाकर धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.003
83
थलीपसी
39
247
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.060
84
थलीपसी
46/3
250
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.026
85
थलीपसी
25
251
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.023
86
थलीपसी
25
252
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.039
87
थलीपसी
46/6
253
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.034
88
थलीपसी
46/6
254
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.017
89
थलीपसी
44
255
सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.041
90
थलीपसी
9
256
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान व
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.027
91
थलीपसी
9
257
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान व
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.016
92
थलीपसी
37
258
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.048
93
थलीपसी
46/3
259
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान व अय सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.034
94
थलीपसी
25
260
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.018
95
थलीपसी
9
261
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.025
96
थलीपसी
25
262
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.028
97
थलीपसी
9
263
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.036
98
थलीपसी
25
264
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.022
99
थलीपसी
9
265
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.022
100
थलीपसी
46/3
266
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.030
101
थलीपसी
44
267
सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.027
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2579
102
थलीपसी
46/6
268
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.041
103
थलीपसी
37
269
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.017
104
थलीपसी
44
270
सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.014
105
थलीपसी
37
271
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.034
106
थलीपसी
46/6
272
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.061
107
थलीपसी
46/3
273
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.049
108
थलीपसी
46/3
274
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.020
109
थलीपसी
9
275
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.043
110
थलीपसी
46/3
276
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.050
111
थलीपसी
25
277
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.063
112
थलीपसी
9
278
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.044
113
थलीपसी
37
279
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.031
114
थलीपसी
46/6
280
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.030
115
थलीपसी
46/6
281
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.052
116
थलीपसी
37
282
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.070
117
थलीपसी
44
283
सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.067
118
थलीपसी
46/6
284
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.022
119
थलीपसी
37
285
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.014
120
थलीपसी
37
286
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.029
121
थलीपसी
9
287
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.036
122
थलीपसी
25
288
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.039
2580
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
123
थलीपसी
46/3
289
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.041
124
थलीपसी
37
290
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.053
125
थलीपसी
44
291
सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.023
126
थलीपसी
44
292
सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.028
127
थलीपसी
44
293
सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.036
128
थलीपसी
46/6
294
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.035
129
थलीपसी
44
295
सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.049
130
थलीपसी
44
296
सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.038
131
थलीपसी
37
297
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.088
132
थलीपसी
37
298
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.040
133
थलीपसी
46/6
299
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.026
134
थलीपसी
46/6
300
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.041
135
थलीपसी
44
301
सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.075
136
थलीपसी
37
302
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.068
137
थलीपसी
46/6
303
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.046
138
थलीपसी
46/6
304
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.036
139
थलीपसी
44
305
सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.038
140
थलीपसी
25
306
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.034
141
थलीपसी
25
307
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.033
142
थलीपसी
25
308
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.041
143
थलीपसी
25
309
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.058
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2581
144
थलीपसी
25
310
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.044
145
थलीपसी
25
311
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.046
146
थलीपसी
25
312
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.058
147
थलीपसी
25
313
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.043
148
थलीपसी
25
314
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.045
149
थलीपसी
25
315
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.026
150
थलीपसी
25
316
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.023
151
थलीपसी
46/3
321
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.055
152
थलीपसी
9
322
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.026
153
थलीपसी
9
323
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.054
154
थलीपसी
9
324
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.049
155
थलीपसी
9
325
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.060
156
थलीपसी
9
326
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.048
157
थलीपसी
9
327
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.047
158
थलीपसी
9
328
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.049
159
थलीपसी
9
329
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.039
160
थलीपसी
9
330
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.031
161
थलीपसी
46/6
331
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.030
162
थलीपसी
36
332
बीरबर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.019
163
थलीपसी
46/3
333
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.015
164
थलीपसी
46/3
334
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.033
2582
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
165
थलीपसी
46/3
335
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.039
166
थलीपसी
46/3
336
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.044
167
थलीपसी
46/3
337
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.034
168
थलीपसी
46/3
338
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.119
169
थलीपसी
46/3
339
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.064
170
थलीपसी
46/3
340
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.045
171
थलीपसी
37
341
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.036
172
थलीपसी
37
342
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.021
173
थलीपसी
46/6
344
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.025
174
थलीपसी
46/6
345
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.035
175
थलीपसी
46/6
346
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.066
176
थलीपसी
37
347
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.102
177
थलीपसी
44
348
सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.036
178
थलीपसी
44
349
सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.039
179
थलीपसी
37
350
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.075
180
थलीपसी
37
351
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.076
181
थलीपसी
44
352
सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.145
182
थलीपसी
46/6
353
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.102
183
थलीपसी
46/6
354
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.083
184
थलीपसी
37
355
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.076
185
थलीपसी
46/6
356
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.032
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2583
186
थलीपसी
44
357
सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.029
187
थलीपसी
44
358
सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.028
188
थलीपसी
44
359
सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.041
189
थलीपसी
37
360
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.018
190
थलीपसी
37
361
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.028
191
थलीपसी
37
362
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.035
192
थलीपसी
46/6
363
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.063
193
थलीपसी
46/6
364
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.038
194
थलीपसी
46/6
365
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.056
195
थलीपसी
46/3
367
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.026
196
थलीपसी
9
369
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.025
197
थलीपसी
9
370
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.020
198
थलीपसी
25
371
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.051
199
थलीपसी
46/3
372
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.083
200
थलीपसी
25
373
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.040
201
थलीपसी
9
374
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.043
202
थलीपसी
9
375
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.016
203
थलीपसी
25
376
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.012
204
थलीपसी
46/3
377
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.029
205
थलीपसी
46/3
378
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.023
206
थलीपसी
25
379
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.036
2584
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
207
थलीपसी
9
380
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.030
208
थलीपसी
9
381
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.023
209
थलीपसी
25
382
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.023
210
थलीपसी
46/3
383
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.019
211
थलीपसी
46/3
384
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.029
212
थलीपसी
25
385
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.024
213
थलीपसी
9
386
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.024
214
थलीपसी
9
387
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.023
215
थलीपसी
25
388
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.026
216
थलीपसी
46/3
389
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.021
217
थलीपसी
46/3
390
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.031
218
थलीपसी
25
391
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.031
219
थलीपसी
9
392
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.028
220
थलीपसी
9
393
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.030
221
थलीपसी
25
394
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.030
222
थलीपसी
46/3
395
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.034
223
थलीपसी
46/3
396
जसोबंता धान सुपुP जोगेर धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.029
224
थलीपसी
25
397
भाकर धान सुपुP मधुसुदन धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.032
225
थलीपसी
9
398
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.030
226
थलीपसी
9
399
िग$रश च धान सुपुP पुरे धान और
अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.013
227
थलीपसी
37
400
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.028
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2585
228
थलीपसी
37
401
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.106
229
थलीपसी
44
402
सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.064
230
थलीपसी
44
403
सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.046
231
थलीपसी
44
404
सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.047
232
थलीपसी
46/6
405
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.096
233
थलीपसी
46/6
406
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.078
234
थलीपसी
44
407
सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.083
235
थलीपसी
46/6
408
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.108
236
थलीपसी
37
409
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.111
237
थलीपसी
37
410
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.100
238
थलीपसी
46/6
411
च शेखर धान सुपुP चौधरी धान व अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.105
239
थलीपसी
44
412
सुदशGन धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.088
240
थलीपसी
37
413
िबनाथ धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.118
241
थलीपसी
14
417
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.128
242
थलीपसी
14
421
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.092
243
थलीपसी
14
422
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.042
244
थलीपसी
14
423
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.090
245
थलीपसी
14
424
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
जलाय एक
0.014
246
थलीपसी
14
425
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
घारीबारी
0.086
247
थलीपसी
14
426
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.030
248
थलीपसी
14
427
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.054
249
थलीपसी
14
428
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.034
2586
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
250
थलीपसी
14
429
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.020
251
थलीपसी
14
430
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.017
252
थलीपसी
14
431
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.076
253
थलीपसी
14
432
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.036
254
थलीपसी
14
433
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.026
255
थलीपसी
14
434
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.027
256
थलीपसी
14
436
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.001
257
थलीपसी
14
437
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.005
258
थलीपसी
14
472
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.009
259
थलीपसी
14
473
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.022
260
थलीपसी
14
474
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.006
261
थलीपसी
14
475
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.026
262
थलीपसी
14
476
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.012
263
थलीपसी
14
477
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.043
264
थलीपसी
14
478
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.013
265
थलीपसी
14
479
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.019
266
थलीपसी
14
480
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.016
267
थलीपसी
14
481
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.021
268
थलीपसी
14
482
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.024
269
थलीपसी
14
483
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमालवो सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.056
270
थलीपसी
18
495
नंदकशोर सा सुपुP याम सा
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.034
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2587
271
थलीपसी
46/10
500
दगJबर सा सुपुP रतनाकर सा
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.047
272
थलीपसी
2
501
उछाब सा सुपुP कयाण सा
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.038
273
थलीपसी
3
502
कामरा सा सुपुP कयाण सा
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.044
274
थलीपसी
42
503
महान सा सुपुP कु-v सा
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.055
275
थलीपसी
3
510
कामरा सा सुपुP कयाण सा
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.126
276
थलीपसी
2
511
उछाब सा सुपुP कयाण सा
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.111
277
थलीपसी
42
512
महान सा सुपुP कु-v सा
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.062
278
थलीपसी
40
513
महान सा सुपुP कु-v सा
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.048
279
थलीपसी
23
514
काश सा सुपुP कु-v सा
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.051
280
थलीपसी
3
515
कामरा सा सुपुP कयाण सा
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.063
281
थलीपसी
2
516
उछाब सा सुपुP कयाण सा
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.092
282
थलीपसी
12
522
गोबधGन सा सुपुP आनंदी सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.190
283
थलीपसी
18
523
नंदकशोर सा सुपुP याम सा
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.080
284
थलीपसी
18
524
नंदकशोर सा सुपुP याम सा
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.086
285
थलीपसी
18
525
नंदकशोर सा सुपुP याम सा
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.088
286
थलीपसी
18
526
नंदकशोर सा सुपुP याम सा
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.050
287
थलीपसी
18
527
नंदकशोर सा सुपुP याम सा
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.058
288
थलीपसी
12
528
नंदकशोर सा सुपुP याम सा
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.080
289
थलीपसी
23
529
काश सा सुपुP कु-v सा
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.023
290
थलीपसी
40
530
मदन सा सुपुP कु-v सा
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.022
291
थलीपसी
3
531
कामरा सा सुपुP कयाण सा
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.040
2588
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
292
थलीपसी
2
532
उछाब सा सुपुP कयाण सा
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.043
293
थलीपसी
11
533
गोबधGन सा सुपुP आनंदी सा और अय
पतीता
0.024
294
थलीपसी
11
534
गोबधGन सा सुपुP आनंदी सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.044
295
थलीपसी
24
535
काश सा सुपुP कु-र सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.019
296
थलीपसी
24
536
काश सा सुपुP कु-र सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.027
297
थलीपसी
10
539
गुजी धान सुपुP पानू धान और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
दो फसली
0.070
298
थलीपसी
10
540
गुजी धान सुपुP पानू धान और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
दो फसली
0.051
299
थलीपसी
10
543
गुजी धान सुपुP पानू धान और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
दो फसली
0.169
300
थलीपसी
10
544
गुजी धान सुपुP पानू धान और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
दो फसली
0.171
301
थलीपसी
10
548
गुजी धान सुपुP पानू धान और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
दो फसली
0.044
302
थलीपसी
14
549
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमावलो सा और अय सरदा जालसाचीता
दो फसली
0.050
303
थलीपसी
20
550
नू रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
पतीता
0.018
304
थलीपसी
14
551
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमलावो सा और अय
पतीता
0.096
305
थलीपसी
20
552
नू रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
दो फसली
0.036
306
थलीपसी
20
553
नू रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
दो फसली
0.015
307
थलीपसी
14
561
दशरथी सा सुपुP पदमलावो सा और अय सरदा जालसाचीता
दो फसली
0.001
308
थलीपसी
20
569
नू रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
सरदा जालसाचीता
एक फसली
0.019
309
थलीपसी
20
570
नू रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
तैला
0.216
310
थलीपसी
46/5
576
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण सा
तैला
0.487
311
थलीपसी
46/5
577
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण सा
तैला
0.140
312
थलीपसी
46/5
578
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण सा
पतीता
0.013
313
थलीपसी
30
579
िबsम धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान और अय
घाराबारी
0.132
314
थलीपसी
30
580
िबsम धान सुपुP जदुनाथ धान और अय
घाराबारी
0.121
315
थलीपसी
46/7
581
मनोज कुमार धान सुपुP बालूकेर धान
तैला
0.028
316
थलीपसी
46/8
582
कुमुदा धान सुपुP बालूकेर धान
तैला
0.046
317
थलीपसी
46/9
583
छबीला कुमार धान सुपुP बालूकेर धान
तैला
0.039
जोड़ :
20.555
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2589
(3) Rाम – िबJबाधारापुर
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी)
s.सं.
आर.I सeकल/ Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर
मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
1
िबJबाधारापुर
22
6
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नराना धान और
अय
तैला
1.150
2
िबJबाधारापुर
16
7
िनसामिण सडांगी पB नी बालकृण
सडांगी
तैला
0.387
3
िबJबाधारापुर
16
8
िनसामिण सडांगी पB नी बालकृण
सडांगी
तैला
0.419
4
िबJबाधारापुर
22
12
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नराना धान और
अय
तैला
0.147
5
िबJबाधारापुर
22
13
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नराना धान और
अय
तैला
0.157
6
िबJबाधारापुर
22
14
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नराना धान और
अय
तैला
0.456
7
िबJबाधारापुर
22
15
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नराना धान और
अय
तैला
0.132
8
िबJबाधारापुर
29
16
सरोज नायक सुपुP सरदार नायक
और अय
तैला
0.104
9
िबJबाधारापुर
34/10
18
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
तैला
0.274
10
िबJबाधारापुर
34/10
20
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
तैला
0.226
11
िबJबाधारापुर
34/5
21
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
तैला
0.146
12
िबJबाधारापुर
34/34
22
िसिसर कुमार बेहेरा सुपुP कािलया
बेहेरा
तैला
0.139
13
िबJबाधारापुर
10
23
िPनाथ नायक सुपुP बेड़ा नायक और
अय
तैला
0.056
14
िबJबाधारापुर
7
29
चैतय नायक सुपुP बैशतम नायक
और अय
तैला
0.113
15
िबJबाधारापुर
7
30
चैतय नायक सुपुP बैशतम नायक
और अय
तैला
0.232
16
िबJबाधारापुर
27
31
रा नायक सुपुP कािलया नायक और
अय
तैला
0.584
17
िबJबाधारापुर
20
32
िबकाला बाघ सुपुP मुलई बाघ और
अय
तैला
0.505
18
िबJबाधारापुर
34/9
33
उमा नायक पी कयाण नायक
तैला
0.515
2590
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
19
िबJबाधारापुर
17
39
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहनहा सा और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.030
20
िबJबाधारापुर
17
40
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहनहा सा और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.026
21
िबJबाधारापुर
17
41
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहनहा सा और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.051
22
िबJबाधारापुर
17
44
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहनहा सा और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.043
23
िबJबाधारापुर
17
45
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहनहा सा और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.028
24
िबJबाधारापुर
17
46
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहनहा सा और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.020
25
िबJबाधारापुर
17
47
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहनहा सा और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.091
26
िबJबाधारापुर
17
48
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहनहा सा और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.044
27
िबJबाधारापुर
17
49
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहनहा सा और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.063
28
िबJबाधारापुर
17
50
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहनहा सा और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.084
29
िबJबाधारापुर
17
51
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहनहा सा और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.082
30
िबJबाधारापुर
4
52
िखरामोहन सा सुपुP जोगे सा
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.079
31
िबJबाधारापुर
4
53
िखरामोहन सा सुपुP जोगे सा
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.069
32
िबJबाधारापुर
4
54
िखरामोहन सा सुपुP जोगे सा
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.038
33
िबJबाधारापुर
4
55
िखरामोहन सा सुपुP जोगे सा
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.048
34
िबJबाधारापुर
4
56
िखरामोहन सा सुपुP जोगे सा
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.052
35
िबJबाधारापुर
4
57
िखरामोहन सा सुपुP जोगे सा
सारदा
0.032
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2591
और अय
जलसािचता एक
फसली
36
िबJबाधारापुर
4
58
िखरामोहन सा सुपुP जोगे सा
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.057
37
िबJबाधारापुर
2
59
कंदुर धान सुपुP कधा धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.042
38
िबJबाधारापुर
15
60
नाकोफोदी धान सुपुP साहादेब
धान और अय
तैला
0.274
39
िबJबाधारापुर
8
61
जाडू धान सुपुP आराखीता धान
और अय
तैला
0.123
40
िबJबाधारापुर
8
62
जाडू धान सुपुP आराखीता धान
और अय
तैला
0.121
41
िबJबाधारापुर
34/8
63
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
तैला
0.279
42
िबJबाधारापुर
8
64
जाडू धान सुपुP आराखीता धान
और अय
तैला
0.105
43
िबJबाधारापुर
8
65
जाडू धान सुपुP आराखीता धान
और अय
तैला
0.106
44
िबJबाधारापुर
8
66
जाडू धान सुपुP आराखीता धान
और अय
तैला
0.109
45
िबJबाधारापुर
8
67
जाडू धान सुपुP आराखीता धान
और अय
तैला
0.401
46
िबJबाधारापुर
1
78
किपल धान सुपुP सुना धान
तैला
0.079
47
िबJबाधारापुर
1
80
किपल धान सुपुP सुना धान
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.130
48
िबJबाधारापुर
1
81
किपल धान सुपुP सुना धान
तैला
0.270
49
िबJबाधारापुर
31
82
zीिनबास नायक सुपुP बका नायक
तैला
0.308
50
िबJबाधारापुर
34/17
83
सरोज कुमार बेहेरा सुपुP रघुनाथ
बेहेरा और अय
तैला
0.220
51
िबJबाधारापुर
7
84
चैतय नायक सुपुP बैशतम नायक
और अय
तैला
0.157
52
िबJबाधारापुर
34/7
105
सBयनारायण सा सुपुP भाजामन
सा
तैला
0.342
53
िबJबाधारापुर
14
106
दुरजोधना सा सुपुP पथानी सा
और अय
तैला
0.119
54
िबJबाधारापुर
14
107
दुरजोधना सा सुपुP पथानी सा
और अय
तैला
0.180
55
िबJबाधारापुर
14
108
दुरजोधना सा सुपुP पथानी सा
और अय
तैला
0.136
56
िबJबाधारापुर
26
114
महेर सा सुपुP दसरथी सा और
अय
तैला
0.517
57
िबJबाधारापुर
30
116
सरांगाधर सा सुपुP बंगुv सा
तैला
0.294
58
िबJबाधारापुर
9
121
दमबुv धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
0.288
2592
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
फसली
59
िबJबाधारापुर
34
123
हvदानंद दे-रे सुपुP काथी दे-रे और
अय
तैला
0.222
60
िबJबाधारापुर
34
128
हvदानंद दे-रे सुपुP काथी दे-रे और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.220
61
िबJबाधारापुर
34
129
हvदानंद दे-रे सुपुP काथी दे-रे और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.092
62
िबJबाधारापुर
34
130
हvदानंद दे-रे सुपुP काथी दे-रे और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.043
63
िबJबाधारापुर
5
131
िखता बाघा सुपुP कैv बाघा
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.188
64
िबJबाधारापुर
5
132
िखता बाघा सुपुP कैv बाघा
तैला
0.163
65
िबJबाधारापुर
5
133
िखता बाघा सुपुP कैv बाघा
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.064
66
िबJबाधारापुर
5
134
िखता बाघा सुपुP कैv बाघा
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.016
67
िबJबाधारापुर
5
135
िखता बाघा सुपुP कैv बाघा
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.071
68
िबJबाधारापुर
5
136
िखता बाघा सुपुP कैv बाघा
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.092
69
िबJबाधारापुर
5
137
िखता बाघा सुपुP कैv बाघा
तैला
0.434
70
िबJबाधारापुर
3
139
कशोरी धान सुपुP नाता धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.614
71
िबJबाधारापुर
33
150
हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुP मदन बेहेरा और
अय
तैला
0.060
72
िबJबाधारापुर
33
151
हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुP मदन बेहेरा और
अय
तैला
0.045
73
िबJबाधारापुर
33
152
हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुP मदन बेहेरा और
अय
तैला
0.061
74
िबJबाधारापुर
33
153
हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुP मदन बेहेरा और
अय
तैला
0.037
75
िबJबाधारापुर
33
154
हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुP मदन बेहेरा और
अय
तैला
0.030
76
िबJबाधारापुर
33
156
हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुP मदन बेहेरा और
अय
तैला
0.322
77
िबJबाधारापुर
33
157
हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुP मदन बेहेरा और
अय
तैला
0.104
78
िबJबाधारापुर
33
158
हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुP मदन बेहेरा और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.130
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2593
79
िबJबाधारापुर
33
159
हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुP मदन बेहेरा और
अय
तैला
0.160
80
िबJबाधारापुर
19
160
भलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
तैला
1.238
81
िबJबाधारापुर
22
166
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नाराना धान
और अय
तैला
0.726
82
िबJबाधारापुर
25
168
भाजी धान सुपुP कनिथया धान
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.095
83
िबJबाधारापुर
25
169
भाजी धान सुपुP कनिथया धान
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.085
84
िबJबाधारापुर
25
173
भाजी धान सुपुP कनिथया धान
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.019
85
िबJबाधारापुर
25
174
भाजी धान सुपुP कनिथया धान
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.048
86
िबJबाधारापुर
25
175
भाजी धान सुपुP कनिथया धान
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.099
87
िबJबाधारापुर
25
176
भाजी धान सुपुP कनिथया धान
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.124
88
िबJबाधारापुर
25
177
भाजी धान सुपुP कनिथया धान
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.033
89
िबJबाधारापुर
25
178
भाजी धान सुपुP कनिथया धान
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.019
90
िबJबाधारापुर
25
179
भाजी धान सुपुP कनिथया धान
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.018
91
िबJबाधारापुर
25
180
भाजी धान सुपुP कनिथया धान
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.037
92
िबJबाधारापुर
25
181
भाजी धान सुपुP कनिथया धान
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.026
93
िबJबाधारापुर
25
182
भाजी धान सुपुP कनिथया धान
तैला
0.062
94
िबJबाधारापुर
6
183
गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर
धान और अय
तैला
0.087
95
िबJबाधारापुर
15
184
नाकोफोदी धान सुपुP साहदेब
धान और अय
तैला
0.077
96
िबJबाधारापुर
21
185
बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंगा धान
तैला
0.076
97
िबJबाधारापुर
2
186
कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और
अय
तैला
0.100
98
िबJबाधारापुर
2
187
कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और
तैला
0.121
2594
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
अय
99
िबJबाधारापुर
11
188
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
तैला
0.075
100
िबJबाधारापुर
11
189
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
तैला
0.072
101
िबJबाधारापुर
11
190
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
तैला
0.090
102
िबJबाधारापुर
23
191
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
तैला
0.100
103
िबJबाधारापुर
23
192
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
तैला
0.091
104
िबJबाधारापुर
18
193
भलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
तैला
0.113
105
िबJबाधारापुर
18
194
भलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
तैला
0.133
106
िबJबाधारापुर
21
195
बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंगा धान
तैला
0.214
107
िबJबाधारापुर
22
196
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नाराना धान
और अय
पतीता
0.008
108
िबJबाधारापुर
23
197
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.051
109
िबJबाधारापुर
23
198
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.050
110
िबJबाधारापुर
23
199
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.046
111
िबJबाधारापुर
23
200
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.046
112
िबJबाधारापुर
23
201
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.042
113
िबJबाधारापुर
23
202
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.045
114
िबJबाधारापुर
23
203
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.072
115
िबJबाधारापुर
23
204
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.029
116
िबJबाधारापुर
23
205
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.037
117
िबJबाधारापुर
23
206
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
0.069
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2595
फसली
118
िबJबाधारापुर
23
207
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.027
119
िबJबाधारापुर
23
208
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.033
120
िबJबाधारापुर
23
209
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.033
121
िबJबाधारापुर
23
210
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.028
122
िबJबाधारापुर
23
211
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.083
123
िबJबाधारापुर
23
212
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.049
124
िबJबाधारापुर
23
213
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.036
125
िबJबाधारापुर
23
214
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.041
126
िबJबाधारापुर
23
215
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.033
127
िबJबाधारापुर
23
216
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.048
128
िबJबाधारापुर
23
217
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.037
129
िबJबाधारापुर
23
218
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.043
130
िबJबाधारापुर
23
219
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.021
131
िबJबाधारापुर
23
220
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.024
132
िबJबाधारापुर
23
221
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.029
133
िबJबाधारापुर
22
222
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
पतीता
0.060
2596
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
134
िबJबाधारापुर
23
223
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.027
135
िबJबाधारापुर
23
224
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.045
136
िबJबाधारापुर
21
225
बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंग धान
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.423
137
िबJबाधारापुर
21
226
बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंग धान
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.037
138
िबJबाधारापुर
21
227
बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंग धान
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.037
139
िबJबाधारापुर
21
228
बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंग धान
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.037
140
िबJबाधारापुर
21
229
बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंग धान
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.031
141
िबJबाधारापुर
21
230
बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंग धान
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.034
142
िबJबाधारापुर
21
231
बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंग धान
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.045
143
िबJबाधारापुर
18
232
भलभ धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.052
144
िबJबाधारापुर
18
233
भलभ धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.041
145
िबJबाधारापुर
18
234
भलभ धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.033
146
िबJबाधारापुर
18
235
भलभ धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.032
147
िबJबाधारापुर
18
236
भलभ धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.035
148
िबJबाधारापुर
18
237
भलभ धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.153
149
िबJबाधारापुर
18
238
भलभ धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.039
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2597
150
िबJबाधारापुर
18
239
भलभ धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.041
151
िबJबाधारापुर
18
240
भलभ धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.045
152
िबJबाधारापुर
18
241
भलभ धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.035
153
िबJबाधारापुर
18
242
भलभ धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.140
154
िबJबाधारापुर
15
243
नाकोफोदी धान सुपुP साहदेब
धान और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.143
155
िबJबाधारापुर
15
244
नाकोफोदी धान सुपुP साहदेब
धान और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.137
156
िबJबाधारापुर
15
245
नाकोफोदी धान सुपुP साहदेब
धान और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.118
157
िबJबाधारापुर
15
246
नाकोफोदी धान सुपुP साहदेब
धान और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.116
158
िबJबाधारापुर
15
247
नाकोफोदी धान सुपुP साहदेब
धान और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.111
159
िबJबाधारापुर
15
248
नाकोफोदी धान सुपुP साहदेब
धान और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.115
160
िबJबाधारापुर
15
249
नाकोफोदी धान सुपुP साहदेब
धान और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.047
161
िबJबाधारापुर
15
250
नाकोफोदी धान सुपुP साहदेब
धान और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.047
162
िबJबाधारापुर
6
251
गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर
धान और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.092
163
िबJबाधारापुर
6
252
गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर
धान और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.082
164
िबJबाधारापुर
6
253
गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर
धान और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.074
165
िबJबाधारापुर
6
254
गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर
धान और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.069
166
िबJबाधारापुर
6
255
गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर
सारदा
0.111
2598
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
धान और अय
जलसािचता एक
फसली
167
िबJबाधारापुर
34/21
256
जनक दे-रे सुपुP मुलई दे-रे
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.120
168
िबJबाधारापुर
6
257
गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर
धान और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.249
169
िबJबाधारापुर
11
258
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.059
170
िबJबाधारापुर
11
259
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.015
171
िबJबाधारापुर
11
260
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.009
172
िबJबाधारापुर
11
261
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.016
173
िबJबाधारापुर
11
262
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.018
174
िबJबाधारापुर
2
263
कंदुर धान सुपुP कधा धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.053
175
िबJबाधारापुर
2
264
कंदुर धान सुपुP कधा धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.041
176
िबJबाधारापुर
2
265
कंदुर धान सुपुP कधा धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.227
177
िबJबाधारापुर
2
266
कंदुर धान सुपुP कधा धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.087
178
िबJबाधारापुर
2
267
कंदुर धान सुपुP कधा धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.101
179
िबJबाधारापुर
11
268
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.115
180
िबJबाधारापुर
11
269
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.105
181
िबJबाधारापुर
11
270
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.070
182
िबJबाधारापुर
11
271
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
0.038
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2599
अय
फसली
183
िबJबाधारापुर
11
272
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.091
184
िबJबाधारापुर
11
273
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.098
185
िबJबाधारापुर
11
274
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.092
186
िबJबाधारापुर
2
275
कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.070
187
िबJबाधारापुर
2
276
कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.107
188
िबJबाधारापुर
2
277
कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.024
189
िबJबाधारापुर
2
278
कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.025
190
िबJबाधारापुर
2
279
कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.023
191
िबJबाधारापुर
2
280
कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.078
192
िबJबाधारापुर
2
281
कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.023
193
िबJबाधारापुर
11
282
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.023
194
िबJबाधारापुर
11
283
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.019
195
िबJबाधारापुर
11
284
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.023
196
िबJबाधारापुर
11
285
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.039
197
िबJबाधारापुर
11
286
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.033
198
िबJबाधारापुर
11
287
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
0.044
2600
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
फसली
199
िबJबाधारापुर
11
288
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.049
200
िबJबाधारापुर
11
289
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.042
201
िबJबाधारापुर
2
290
कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.052
202
िबJबाधारापुर
2
291
कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.052
203
िबJबाधारापुर
11
292
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.042
204
िबJबाधारापुर
11
293
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.015
205
िबJबाधारापुर
11
294
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.018
206
िबJबाधारापुर
11
295
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.022
207
िबJबाधारापुर
11
296
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.020
208
िबJबाधारापुर
11
297
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.107
209
िबJबाधारापुर
11
298
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.110
210
िबJबाधारापुर
11
299
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.110
211
िबJबाधारापुर
11
300
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.062
212
िबJबाधारापुर
11
301
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.093
213
िबJबाधारापुर
11
302
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
तैला
0.067
214
िबJबाधारापुर
11
303
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
अय
तैला
0.051
215
िबJबाधारापुर
11
304
िPपुरा धान सुपुP जनका धान और
तैला
0.160
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2601
अय
216
िबJबाधारापुर
23
305
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
तैला
0.035
217
िबJबाधारापुर
23
306
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
तैला
0.129
218
िबJबाधारापुर
23
307
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
तैला
0.165
219
िबJबाधारापुर
23
308
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
तैला
0.159
220
िबJबाधारापुर
23
309
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
तैला
0.158
221
िबJबाधारापुर
18
312
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
तैला
0.049
222
िबJबाधारापुर
18
313
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
तैला
0.056
223
िबJबाधारापुर
18
314
बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
तैला
0.040
224
िबJबाधारापुर
18
315
बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
तैला
0.045
225
िबJबाधारापुर
18
316
बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
तैला
0.040
226
िबJबाधारापुर
18
317
बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
तैला
0.043
227
िबJबाधारापुर
18
318
बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
तैला
0.041
228
िबJबाधारापुर
18
319
बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
तैला
0.026
229
िबJबाधारापुर
18
320
बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
तैला
0.057
230
िबJबाधारापुर
18
321
बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
तैला
0.037
231
िबJबाधारापुर
18
322
बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
तैला
0.037
232
िबJबाधारापुर
18
323
बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
तैला
0.039
233
िबJबाधारापुर
18
324
बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
तैला
0.081
234
िबJबाधारापुर
6
325
गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर
धान और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.078
235
िबJबाधारापुर
18
326
बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
तैला
0.070
236
िबJबाधारापुर
21
327
बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंगा धान ।
तैला
0.210
237
िबJबाधारापुर
15
328
नाकोफोदी धान सुपुP साहदेब
धान और अय
तैला
0.171
238
िबJबाधारापुर
21
333
बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंगा धान ।
तैला
0.161
2602
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
239
िबJबाधारापुर
6
334
गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर
धान और अय
तैला
0.123
240
िबJबाधारापुर
6
335
गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर
धान और अय
तैला
0.056
241
िबJबाधारापुर
6
336
गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर
धान और अय
तैला
0.119
242
िबJबाधारापुर
2
337
कंदुर धान सुपुP कधा धान और
अय
तैला
0.179
243
िबJबाधारापुर
2
338
कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और
अय
तैला
0.171
244
िबJबाधारापुर
2
339
कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और
अय
तैला
0.114
245
िबJबाधारापुर
2
340
कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.086
246
िबJबाधारापुर
2
341
कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.044
247
िबJबाधारापुर
2
342
कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.028
248
िबJबाधारापुर
2
343
कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.022
249
िबJबाधारापुर
2
344
कंदुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और
अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.022
250
िबJबाधारापुर
6
345
गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर
धान और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.044
251
िबJबाधारापुर
6
346
गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर
धान और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.034
252
िबJबाधारापुर
6
347
गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर
धान और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.027
253
िबJबाधारापुर
6
348
गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर
धान और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.030
254
िबJबाधारापुर
6
349
गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर
धान और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.027
255
िबJबाधारापुर
6
350
गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर
धान और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.029
256
िबJबाधारापुर
6
351
गोपालच ा धान सुपुP बेनुधर
धान और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.051
257
िबJबाधारापुर
4
352
िखरामोहन सा सुपुP जोगे सा
तैला
0.112
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2603
और अय
258
िबJबाधारापुर
9
353
दामबुv धान सुपुP िनतयानंद धान
तैला
0.146
259
िबJबाधारापुर
18
354
बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.042
260
िबJबाधारापुर
18
355
बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.065
261
िबJबाधारापुर
18
356
बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.027
262
िबJबाधारापुर
18
357
बलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.076
263
िबJबाधारापुर
23
358
बैब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.071
264
िबJबाधारापुर
23
359
बैब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.099
265
िबJबाधारापुर
9
360
दमबुv धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.013
266
िबJबाधारापुर
9
361
दमबुv धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
तैला
0.049
267
िबJबाधारापुर
15
366
नाकोफोदी धान सुपुP साहदेब
धान और अय
पतीता
0.065
268
िबJबाधारापुर
24
367
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
तैला
0.394
269
िबJबाधारापुर
24
368
बैशनब धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
तैला
0.022
270
िबJबाधारापुर
4
369
िखरामोहन सा सुपुP जोगे सा
और अय
तैला
0.277
271
िबJबाधारापुर
4
370
िखरामोहन सा सुपुP जोगे सा
और अय
तैला
0.079
272
िबJबाधारापुर
4
371
िखरामोहन सा सुपुP जोगे सा
और अय
तैला
0.066
273
िबJबाधारापुर
4
372
िखरामोहन सा सुपुP जोगे सा
और अय
तैला
0.158
274
िबJबाधारापुर
21
377
बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंगा धान
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.172
275
िबJबाधारापुर
21
378
बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंगा धान
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.203
276
िबJबाधारापुर
21
379
बीरा धान सुपुP गौरंगा धान
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.048
277
िबJबाधारापुर
18
381
भलभ ा धान सुपुP मगुनी धान
और अ य
तैला
0.403
2604
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
278
िबJबाधारापुर
2
382
कंधुर धान सुपुP कंधा धान और
अ य
तैला
0.308
279
िबJबाधारापुर
34/5
395
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िब नु चरण
सा
तैला
0.769
280
िबJबाधारापुर
34/2
396
भोले वर सा सुपुP बगुv सा
तैला
0.362
281
िबJबाधारापुर
34/4
397
बीनोदनी रैऊता पB नी वै नब रैऊता
तैला
0.320
282
िबJबाधारापुर
34/6
398
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िब नु चरण
सा
तैला
0.345
283
िबJबाधारापुर
34/8
399
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िब नु चरण
सा
तैला
0.240
284
िबJबाधारापुर
34/11
401
गंधरबा नायक सुपुP कुरतारथा नायक
तैला
0.267
285
िबJबाधारापुर
34/11
402
गंधरबा नायकसुपुP कुरतारथा नायक
तैला
0.151
286
िबJबाधारापुर
34/12
403
रंजनकुमार बेहेरा सुपुP कंदारपा
बेहेरा
तैला
0.159
287
िबJबाधारापुर
34/10
404
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िब नु चरण
सा
तैला
0.051
288
िबJबाधारापुर
34/10
405
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िब नु चरण
सा
तैला
0.053
289
िबJबाधारापुर
34/10
406
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िब नु चरण
सा
तैला
0.038
290
िबJबाधारापुर
34/10
407
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िब नु चरण
सा
तैला
0.029
291
िबJबाधारापुर
34/10
408
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िब नु चरण
सा
तैला
0.040
292
िबJबाधारापुर
34/10
409
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िब नु चरण
सा
तैला
0.081
293
िबJबाधारापुर
34/10
410
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िब नु चरण
सा
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.110
294
िबJबाधारापुर
34/13
411
अvण कुमार नायक सुपुP ह$रहारा
नायक
तैला
0.090
295
िबJबाधारापुर
34/14
412
सिबता सा पB नी जागाबंधु सा
तैला
0.055
296
िबJबाधारापुर
34/15
413
हाताकसोरा धान सुपुP दयािनिध
धान
तैला
0.019
297
िबJबाधारापुर
34/16
414
सानतना बागा सुपुP िखती बागा
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.077
298
िबJबाधारापुर
34/18
415
सारथी सा सुपुP गौरा सा
तैला
0.038
299
िबJबाधारापुर
34/19
416
भागाबत सा सुपुP बाला सा
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.016
300
िबJबाधारापुर
34/20
417
िबनय कुमार बहेरा सुपुP सुसांत
कुमार बहेरा ओर अ य
तैला
0.116
301
िबJबाधारापुर
34/22
418
धमे सा सुपुP रिब सा
तैला
0.108
302
िबJबाधारापुर
34/23
419
मनोज कुमार सा सुपुP राज सा
तैला
0.062
303
िबJबाधारापुर
34/24
420
रंजीता धानसुपुP हरमोहन धान
सारदा
जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.011
304
िबJबाधारापुर
34/24
421
रंजीता धानसुपुP हरमोहन धान
सारदा
0.014
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2605
जलसािचता एक
फसली
305
िबJबाधारापुर
34/25
422
िबनय कुमार बहेरा सुपुP सुसांत
कुमार बहेरा और अ य
तैला
0.183
306
िबJबाधारापुर
34/25
423
िबनय कुमार बहेरा सुपुP सुसांत
कुमार बहेरा और अ य
तैला
0.106
307
िबJबाधारापुर
34/25
424
िबनय कुमार बहेरा सुपुP सुसांत
कुमार बहेरा और अ य
तैला
0.044
308
िबJबाधारापुर
34/28
425
तुकाना नायक सुपुP दलासवर नायक
तैला
0.047
309
िबJबाधारापुर
34/26
426
फूल कुमार सेठी सुपुP बौरीबंधु सेठी
तैला
0.049
310
िबJबाधारापुर
34/27
427
कुतला बहेरा पी सुचीदानंदा बहेरा
तैला
0.033
311
िबJबाधारापुर
34/29
428
बीनापानी धान पी कपासवर
सा
तैला
0.179
312
िबJबाधारापुर
34/30
429
गंगाधर बागा सुपुP िबकाल बागा
तैला
0.017
313
िबJबाधारापुर
34/31
430
धीरे बागा सुपुP िबकल बागा
तैला
0.017
314
िबJबाधारापुर
34/32
431
सुलोचना महाकुदा पी िब4याधर
महाकुदा
तैला
0.020
315
िबJबाधारापुर
34/33
432
रेबती रऊता पी तनुच ा रऊता
तैला
0.020
जोड़ :
जोड़ :
जोड़ :
जोड़ :
35.724
35.724
35.724
35.724
(4) Rाम – कुडापासी
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )
s.
सं.
आर.I सeकल/
Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर
मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
1
कुडापासी
114/27
3
zीमता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
तैला
0.291
2
कुडापासी
12
4
कुलमिण नायक सुपुP बैरंगी नायक
तैला
0.279
3
कुडापासी
111
6
सुदाम िसथे सुपुP बशु िसथे
तैला
0.181
4
कुडापासी
111
7
सुदाम िसथे सुपुP बशु िसथे
तैला
0.072
5
कुडापासी
111
8
सुदाम िसथे सुपुP बशु िसथे
तैला
0.105
2606
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(4) Rाम – कुडापासी
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )
s.
सं.
आर.I सeकल/
Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर
मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
6
कुडापासी
111
9
सुदाम िसथे सुपुP बशु िसथे
तैला
0.122
7
कुडापासी
107
23
zीराम िसथे सुपुP दुखु िसथे
तैला
0.088
8
कुडापासी
94
41
vमा माझी सुपुPी भागबन माझी
तैला
0.123
9
कुडापासी
94
42
vमा माझी सुपुPी भागबन माझी
तैला
1.011
10
कुडापासी
102
43
यामाघाना माझी सुपुP भागबन
माझी
तैला
0.161
11
कुडापासी
102
44
यामाघाना माझी सुपुP भागबन
माझी
तैला
0.107
12
कुडापासी
102
45
यामाघाना माझी सुपुP भागबन
माझी
तैला
0.081
13
कुडापासी
102
46
यामाघाना माझी सुपुP भागबन
माझी
पतीता
0.043
14
कुडापासी
68
48
फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी
पतीता
0.032
15
कुडापासी
68
49
फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी
सारदा अंजलासािचता
तीनी
0.086
16
कुडापासी
68
50
फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी
सारदा अंजलासािचता
तीनी
0.022
17
कुडापासी
68
51
फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी
सारदा अंजलासािचता
तीनी
0.040
18
कुडापासी
68
57
फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी
सारदा अंजलासािचता
तीनी
0.022
19
कुडापासी
68
58
फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी
सारदा अंजलासािचता
तीनी
0.022
20
कुडापासी
68
59
फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी
सारदा अंजलासािचता
तीनी
0.022
21
कुडापासी
68
60
फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी
सारदा अंजलासािचता
तीनी
0.028
22
कुडापासी
68
61
फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी
सारदा अंजलासािचता
तीनी
0.026
23
कुडापासी
68
64
फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी
सारदा अंजलासािचता
तीनी
0.057
24
कुडापासी
68
65
फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी
सारदा अंजलासािचता
तीनी
0.026
25
कुडापासी
68
66
फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी
सारदा अंजलासािचता
तीनी
0.068
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2607
(4) Rाम – कुडापासी
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )
s.
सं.
आर.I सeकल/
Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर
मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
26
कुडापासी
68
67
फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी
पतीता
0.052
27
कुडापासी
68
76
फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी
सारदा अंजलासािचता
तीनी
0.038
28
कुडापासी
68
77
फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी
सारदा अंजलासािचता
तीनी
0.082
29
कुडापासी
68
78
फक#रा माझी सुपुP भागबन माझी
पतीता
0.145
30
कुडापासी
16
79
खागेर माझी सुपुP बागबन माझी
तैला
0.695
31
कुडापासी
16
80
खागेर माझी सुपुP बागबन माझी
तैला
0.227
32
कुडापासी
77
81
बीरा सा सुपुP गंगा सा
तैला
0.308
33
कुडापासी
50
83
पंचू सा सुपुP गंगाधर सा
तैला
0.307
34
कुडापासी
114
84
हडी सा सुपुP ◌ंगंगाधर सा
तैला
0.315
35
कुडापासी
66
98
ाणबंधु सा सुपुP पंचू सा
तैला
0.071
36
कुडापासी
66
99
ाणबंधु सा सुपुP पंचू सा
तैला
0.101
37
कुडापासी
114/27
103
zीमाता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
तैला
0.420
38
कुडापासी
40
104
नालू सा सुपुP बौरी सा
तैला
0.282
39
कुडापासी
13
107
केसाबा सा सुपुP कुंगई सा
तैला
0.080
40
कुडापासी
40
109
नालू सा सुपुP बौरी सा
तैला
0.205
41
कुडापासी
114/33
115
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
तैला
0.275
42
कुडापासी
114/40
116
मनमोहन धान सुपुP गदाधर धान
तैला
0.046
43
कुडापासी
114/8
117
पंचाली बा$रक पी भारत करन
बा$रक
तैला
0.085
44
कुडापासी
87
122
महान सा सुपुP कु-v सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
एक फसली
0.075
45
कुडापासी
87
123
महान सा सुपुP कु-v सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
एक फसली
0.157
46
कुडापासी
87
125
महान सा सुपुP कु-v सा
तैला
0.164
47
कुडापासी
87
126
महान सा सुपुP कु-v सा
तैला
0.143
48
कुडापासी
72
128
बलराम माझी सुपुP चैतया माझी और
अय
तैला
0.175
49
कुडापासी
73
133
बसुदेव सा सुपुP नंदा सा और अय
तैला
0.449
50
कुडापासी
43
136
नीलामिण सा सुपुP ह$र सा
तैला
0.100
51
कुडापासी
25
137
चौधरी सा सुपुP िनBयानंदा सा और
अय
तैला
0.164
52
कुडापासी
43
138
नीलामिण सा सुपुP ह$र सा
तैला
0.083
53
कुडापासी
30
142
जोगी माझी सुपुP बौरी माझी और
तैला
0.527
2608
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(4) Rाम – कुडापासी
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )
s.
सं.
आर.I सeकल/
Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर
मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
अय
54
कुडापासी
30
143
जोगी माझी सुपुP बौरी माझी और
अय
तैला
0.048
55
कुडापासी
84
144
भागीरथी माझी सुपुP बीरा माझी और
अय
तैला
0.420
56
कुडापासी
81
166
बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंदा धान
और अय
तैला
0.756
57
कुडापासी
39
179
नाकाफोडी धान सुपुP साहेब धान
और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
एक फसली
0.216
58
कुडापासी
39
180
नाकाफोडी धान सुपुP साहेब धान
और अय
पतीता
0.024
59
कुडापासी
39
181
नाकाफोडी धान सुपुP साहेब धान
और अय
पतीता
0.009
60
कुडापासी
39
182
नाकाफोडी धान सुपुP साहेब धान
और अय
सारदा जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.131
61
कुडापासी
39
183
नाकाफोडी धान सुपुP साहेब धान
और अय
पतीता
0.009
62
कुडापासी
39
184
नाकाफोडी धान सुपुP साहेब धान
और अय
तैला
0.177
63
कुडापासी
39
185
नाकाफोडी धान सुपुP साहेब धान
और अय
भागायत देई
0.062
64
कुडापासी
39
187
नाकाफोडी धान सुपुP साहेब धान
और अय
सारदा जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.043
65
कुडापासी
79
189
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और
अय
सारदा जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.030
66
कुडापासी
79
190
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और
अय
सारदा जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.045
67
कुडापासी
79
191
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और
अय
सारदा जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.017
68
कुडापासी
79
192
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और
अय
सारदा जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.017
69
कुडापासी
79
194
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और
अय
सारदा जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.383
70
कुडापासी
79
195
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और
अय
सारदा जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.197
71
कुडापासी
79
196
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और
अय
सारदा जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.169
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2609
(4) Rाम – कुडापासी
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )
s.
सं.
आर.I सeकल/
Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर
मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
72
कुडापासी
75
197
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और
अय
तैला
0.018
73
कुडापासी
79
198
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और
अय
पतीता
0.014
74
कुडापासी
79
199
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और
अय
पतीता
0.014
75
कुडापासी
79
200
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और
अय
सारदा जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.206
76
कुडापासी
79
201
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और
अय
सारदा जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.315
77
कुडापासी
79
202
बेनुधर धान सुपुP नारन धान और
अय
सारदा जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.675
78
कुडापासी
23
204
चैतय नायक सुपुP बैव नायक और
अय
तैला
0.016
79
कुडापासी
114/65
206
िबनाथ सेठी सुपुP कैलाश सेठी
तैला
0.145
80
कुडापासी
1
215
अिभराम नायक सुपुP बालक नायक
तैला
0.232
81
कुडापासी
75
222
िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और
अय
तैला
0.040
82
कुडापासी
74
224
िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और
अय
सारदा जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.042
83
कुडापासी
74
225
िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और
अय
सारदा जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.137
84
कुडापासी
75
226
िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और
अय
सारदा जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.061
85
कुडापासी
75
227
िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और
अय
सारदा जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.195
86
कुडापासी
75
229
िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और
अय
पतीता
0.030
87
कुडापासी
75
231
िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और
अय
पतीता
0.031
88
कुडापासी
75
232
िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और
अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.113
89
कुडापासी
75
233
िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और
अय
पतीता
0.016
90
कुडापासी
75
234
िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और
अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.066
91
कुडापासी
81
235
िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और
अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.040
2610
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(4) Rाम – कुडापासी
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )
s.
सं.
आर.I सeकल/
Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर
मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
92
कुडापासी
81
236
िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और
अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.039
93
कुडापासी
75
237
िबsम धान सुपुP बंसीधर धान और
अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.044
94
कुडापासी
81
240
बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.045
95
कुडापासी
81
241
बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
पतीता
0.020
96
कुडापासी
81
242
बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.150
97
कुडापासी
81
243
बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
पपीता
0.008
98
कुडापासी
81
244
बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.086
99
कुडापासी
81
245
बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.098
100
कुडापासी
81
246
बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
पतीता
0.012
101
कुडापासी
81
247
बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
पतीता
0.010
102
कुडापासी
81
248
बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.072
103
कुडापासी
81
249
बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.079
104
कुडापासी
81
253
बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.116
105
कुडापासी
81
254
बैशनाबा धान सुपुP िनBयानंद धान
और अय
पतीता
0.025
106
कुडापासी
75
260
िबsम धान सुपुP बंशीधर धान और
अय
सारदा जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.181
107
कुडापासी
75
263
िबsम धान सुपुP बंशीधर धान और
अय
सारदा जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.151
108
कुडापासी
75
265
िबsम धान सुपुP बंशीधर धान और
अय
पतीता
0.013
109
कुडापासी
75
266
िबsम धान सुपुP बंशीधर धान और
अय
पतीता
0.012
110
कुडापासी
75
267
िबsम धान सुपुP बंशीधर धान और
अय
सारदा जलसािचता एक
फसली
0.160
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2611
(4) Rाम – कुडापासी
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )
s.
सं.
आर.I सeकल/
Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर
मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
111
कुडापासी
47
273
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.228
112
कुडापासी
47
274
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.233
113
कुडापासी
47
275
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.247
114
कुडापासी
47
276
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
पतीता
0.075
115
कुडापासी
47
277
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.132
116
कुडापासी
47
278
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.106
117
कुडापासी
47
279
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.283
118
कुडापासी
47
280
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.285
119
कुडापासी
47
281
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
पतीता
0.028
120
कुडापासी
47
282
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
पतीता
0.019
121
कुडापासी
54
283
पिडया सा सुपुP नहैया सा और
अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
देई
0.091
122
कुडापासी
54
284
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहया सा और
अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
देई
0.080
123
कुडापासी
114/16
289
हदीबंधु सा सुपुP इकादुिसया सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
देई
0.021
124
कुडापासी
114/16
290
हदीबंधु सा सुपुP इकादुिसया सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
देई
0.022
125
कुडापासी
114/16
291
हदीबंधु सा सुपुP इकादुिसया सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
देई
0.046
126
कुडापासी
114/16
292
हदीबंधु सा सुपुP इकादुिसया सा
तैला
0.011
127
कुडापासी
114/16
293
हदीबंधु सा सुपुP इकादुिसया सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
देई
0.010
128
कुडापासी
114/16
295
हदीबंधु सा सुपुP इकादुिसया सा
तैला
0.007
129
कुडापासी
54
297
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहया सा और
अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
देई
0.065
130
कुडापासी
114/33
298
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
देई
0.030
131
कुडापासी
54
299
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहया सा और
अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
देई
0.027
2612
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(4) Rाम – कुडापासी
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )
s.
सं.
आर.I सeकल/
Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर
मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
132
कुडापासी
114/33
300
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.014
133
कुडापासी
54
301
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहया सा और
अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
देई
0.029
134
कुडापासी
54
302
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहया सा और
अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
देई
0.089
135
कुडापासी
114/16
303
हदीबंधु सा सुपुP इकादुिसया सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
देई
0.037
136
कुडापासी
114/16
304
हदीबंधु सा सुपुP इकादुिसया सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
देई
0.042
137
कुडापासी
114/16
305
हदीबंधु सा सुपुP इकादुिसया सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
देई
0.098
138
कुडापासी
54
306
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहया सा और
अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
देई
0.033
139
कुडापासी
54
307
पिड़या सा सुपुP निहया सा और
अय
तैला
0.044
140
कुडापासी
114/33
309
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.107
141
कुडापासी
114/86
317
राठी सेठी सुपुP आनंद सेठी
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.036
142
कुडापासी
114/86
318
राठी सेठी सुपुP आनंद सेठी
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.016
143
कुडापासी
114/73
319
सरोिजनी नायक पB नी अजय नायक
पतीता
0.053
144
कुडापासी
114/33
320
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.255
145
कुडापासी
47
347
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
तैला
0.043
146
कुडापासी
47
348
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
तैला
0.106
147
कुडापासी
47
349
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.230
148
कुडापासी
47
350
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.065
149
कुडापासी
47
351
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.186
150
कुडापासी
47
352
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
पतीता
0.018
151
कुडापासी
47
353
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.157
152
कुडापासी
47
354
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.143
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2613
(4) Rाम – कुडापासी
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )
s.
सं.
आर.I सeकल/
Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर
मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
153
कुडापासी
47
355
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
पतीता
0.040
154
कुडापासी
47
356
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.121
155
कुडापासी
47
357
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
पतीता
0.029
156
कुडापासी
47
358
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.127
157
कुडापासी
47
359
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
पतीता
0.028
158
कुडापासी
47
360
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.116
159
कुडापासी
47
361
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.121
160
कुडापासी
114/24
364
बैशनब राउत सुपुP पूणाG च राउत
तैला
0.155
161
कुडापासी
114/24
365
बैशनब राउत सुपुP पूणाG च राउत
तैला
0.126
162
कुडापासी
99
367
सारथी धान सुपुP िसबा धान
तैला
0.182
163
कुडापासी
46
370
नु-रा सा सुपुP मगुनी सा
तैला
0.259
164
कुडापासी
114/79
371
मनोज कुमार सा सुपुP गऊरा च ा
सा
तैला
0.082
165
कुडापासी
88
375
माही दे-रे सुपुP राम दे-रे
तैला
0.101
166
कुडापासी
10
377
कपताv दे-रे सुपुP राम दे-रे और
अय
तैला
0.114
167
कुडापासी
10
378
कपताv दे-रे सुपुP राम दे-रे और
अय
तैला
0.319
168
कुडापासी
114/29
379
जोगे मिलक सुपुP नरो(म मिलक
तैला
0.251
169
कुडापासी
58
380
पलाऊ सा सुपुP नाताबार सा और
अय
तैला
0.397
170
कुडापासी
23
381
चैतय नायक सुपुP बैव नायक और
अय
तैला
0.233
171
कुडापासी
57
382
पलाऊ सा सुपुP नाता सा और अय
तैला
0.211
172
कुडापासी
28
386
जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी
तैला
0.049
173
कुडापासी
28
387
जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी
तैला
0.081
174
कुडापासी
28
388
जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी
तैला
0.201
175
कुडापासी
28
389
जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी
तैला
0.207
176
कुडापासी
28
390
जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी
तैला
0.051
177
कुडापासी
28
391
जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी
तैला
0.067
178
कुडापासी
28
392
जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी
तैला
0.102
179
कुडापासी
28
393
जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी
तैला
0.099
180
कुडापासी
29
395
जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी
तैला
0.110
2614
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(4) Rाम – कुडापासी
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )
s.
सं.
आर.I सeकल/
Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर
मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
181
कुडापासी
29
396
जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी
तैला
0.193
182
कुडापासी
29
397
जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी
तैला
0.050
183
कुडापासी
28
398
जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी
तैला
0.046
184
कुडापासी
29
400
जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी
तैला
0.109
185
कुडापासी
29
401
जंगली मतैरी सुपुP लखी धर मतैरी
तैला
0.089
186
कुडापासी
114/42
402
दीप धान सुपुP िPलोचन धान
तैला
0.097
187
कुडापासी
114/43
404
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
तैला
0.164
188
कुडापासी
24
405
चैतय नायक सुपुP बैव नायक और
अय
तैला
0.176
189
कुडापासी
24
406
चैतय नायक सुपुP बैव नायक और
अय
तैला
0.081
190
कुडापासी
24
407
चैतय नायक सुपुP बैव नायक और
अय
तैला
0.038
191
कुडापासी
71
408
बनिबहारी सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और
अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.031
192
कुडापासी
71
409
बनिबहारी सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और
अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.016
193
कुडापासी
71
410
बनिबहारी सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और
अय
तैला
0.019
194
कुडापासी
24
411
चैतय नायक सुपुP बैशनव नायक और
अय
तैला
0.040
195
कुडापासी
24
412
चैतय नायक सुपुP बैशनव नायक और
अय
तैला
0.070
196
कुडापासी
24
413
चैतय नायक सुपुP बैशनव नायक और
अय
तैला
0.029
197
कुडापासी
24
414
चैतय नायक सुपुP बैशनव नायक और
अय
तैला
0.064
198
कुडापासी
24
415
चैतय नायक सुपुP बैशनव नायक और
अय
तैला
0.087
199
कुडापासी
24
416
चैतय नायक सुपुP बैशनव नायक और
अय
तैला
0.059
200
कुडापासी
71
417
बनिबहारी सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और
अय
तैला
0.057
201
कुडापासी
71
418
बनिबहारी सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और
अय
तैला
0.043
202
कुडापासी
11
420
कालांदी सा सुपुP सधाबा सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.229
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2615
(4) Rाम – कुडापासी
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )
s.
सं.
आर.I सeकल/
Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर
मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
203
कुडापासी
70
421
बनिबहारी सा सुपुP मगुनी सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.156
204
कुडापासी
70
422
बनिबहारी सा सुपुP मगुनी सा
पतीता
0.020
205
कुडापासी
70
423
बनिबहारी सा सुपुP मगुनी सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.160
206
कुडापासी
70
424
बनिबहारी सा सुपुP मगुनी सा
पतीता
0.027
207
कुडापासी
114/27
425
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.056
208
कुडापासी
114/27
426
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
तैला
0.162
209
कुडापासी
12
427
कुलमिण नायक सुपुP बैरागी नायक
तैला
0.149
210
कुडापासी
114/33
428
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
तैला
0.035
211
कुडापासी
114/33
429
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.032
212
कुडापासी
53
430
पतीतापाबन नायक सुपुP जयकृणा
नायक
तैला
0.064
213
कुडापासी
12
431
कुलमिण नायक सुपुP बैरागी नायक
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.062
214
कुडापासी
12
432
कुलमिण नायक सुपुP बैरागी नायक
तैला
0.053
215
कुडापासी
114/48
434
धीरे सा सुपुP पबीतरा सा
तैला
0.018
216
कुडापासी
114/50
435
दीप सा सुपुP जयकृणा सा
तैला
0.037
217
कुडापासी
71
437
बनिबहारी सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और
अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.355
218
कुडापासी
71
438
बनिबहारी सा सुपुP मगुनी सा और
अय
तैला
0.065
219
कुडापासी
114/48
439
धीरे सा सुपुP पबीतरा सा
तैला
0.056
220
कुडापासी
114/48
440
धीरे सा सुपुP पबीतरा सा
तैला
0.036
221
कुडापासी
114/50
441
दीप सा सुपुP जयकृणा सा
तैला
0.070
222
कुडापासी
114/49
442
िखतीस च सा सुपुP जयकृणा सा
तैला
0.032
223
कुडापासी
114/49
443
िखतीस च सा सुपुP जयकृणा सा
तैला
0.023
224
कुडापासी
114/49
444
िखतीस च सा सुपुP जयकृणा सा
तैला
0.045
225
कुडापासी
114/49
445
िखतीस च सा सुपुP जयकृणा सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.029
226
कुडापासी
114/45
446
मनगोTवदा सा सुपुP दुरजयाधन सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.041
2616
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(4) Rाम – कुडापासी
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )
s.
सं.
आर.I सeकल/
Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर
मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
227
कुडापासी
109
447
सुिखला सा सुपुP बैरा सा और अय
तैला
0.023
228
कुडापासी
109
448
सुिखला सा सुपुP बैरा सा और अय
तैला
0.025
229
कुडापासी
109
449
सुिखला सा सुपुP बैरा सा और अय
तैला
0.015
230
कुडापासी
109
450
सुिखला सा सुपुP बैरा सा और अय
तैला
0.021
231
कुडापासी
43
452
नीलामिण सा सुपुP ह$र सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.041
232
कुडापासी
43
453
नीलामिण सा सुपुP ह$र सा
तैला
0.018
233
कुडापासी
114/43
454
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरन
सा
तैला
0.050
234
कुडापासी
114/43
499
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरन
सा
तैला
0.018
235
कुडापासी
108
500
सुकांती नायक पB नी चैतय नायक
तैला
0.141
236
कुडापासी
114/43
501
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
तैला
0.022
237
कुडापासी
114/43
502
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
तैला
0.037
238
कुडापासी
114/43
503
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
तैला
0.053
239
कुडापासी
24
504
चैतय नायक सुपुP बैव नायक और
अय
तैला
0.061
240
कुडापासी
114/43
505
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
तैला
0.058
241
कुडापासी
114/43
506
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
तैला
0.040
242
कुडापासी
114/43
507
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
तैला
0.072
243
कुडापासी
52
531
पथानी सा सुपुP एकादुसई सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.050
244
कुडापासी
52
532
पथानी सा सुपुP एकादुसई सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.077
245
कुडापासी
52
533
पथानी सा सुपुP एकादुसई सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.014
246
कुडापासी
52
534
पथानी सा सुपुP एकादुसई सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.062
247
कुडापासी
52
535
पथानी सा सुपुP एकादुसई सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.103
248
कुडापासी
52
536
पथानी सा सुपुP एकादुसई सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.119
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2617
(4) Rाम – कुडापासी
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )
s.
सं.
आर.I सeकल/
Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर
मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
249
कुडापासी
52
537
पथानी सा सुपुP एकादुसई सा
पतीता
0.025
250
कुडापासी
114/48
538
धीरे सा सुपुP पबीतरा सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.025
251
कुडापासी
114/45
539
मनगोTवदा सा सुपुP दुरजयाधना
सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.070
252
कुडापासी
50
540
पंचू सा सुपुP गंगाधर सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.039
253
कुडापासी
77
541
बीरा सा सुपुP गंगा सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.018
254
कुडापासी
77
542
बीरा सा सुपुP गंगा सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.018
255
कुडापासी
77
543
बीरा सा सुपुP गंगा सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.009
256
कुडापासी
50
544
पंचू सा सुपुP गंगाधर सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.011
257
कुडापासी
95
545
लमी सा सुपुPी कातु सा और
अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.012
258
कुडापासी
50
546
पंचू सा सुपुP गंगाधर सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.015
259
कुडापासी
50
547
पंचू सा सुपुP गंगाधर सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.012
260
कुडापासी
95
548
लमी सा सुपुPी कातु सा और
अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.022
261
कुडापासी
95
549
लमी सा सुपुPी कातु सा और
अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.022
262
कुडापासी
50
550
पंचू सा सुपुP गंगाधर सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.084
263
कुडापासी
77
551
बीरा सा सुपुP गंगा सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.081
264
कुडापासी
114
552
हादी सा सुपुP गंगाधर सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.027
265
कुडापासी
50
553
पंचू सा सुपुP गंगाधर सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.035
266
कुडापासी
114/26
554
धबई सा सुपुP हादीबंधु सा और
अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.020
267
कुडापासी
61
555
परदेसी माझी सुपुP िनमई माझी और
अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.094
2618
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(4) Rाम – कुडापासी
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )
s.
सं.
आर.I सeकल/
Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर
मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
268
कुडापासी
77
556
बीरा सा सुपुP गंगा सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.097
269
कुडापासी
114
557
हादी सा सुपुP गंगाधर सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.132
270
कुडापासी
77
558
बीरा सा सुपुP गंगा सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.044
271
कुडापासी
114
559
हादी सा सुपुP गंगाधर सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.013
272
कुडापासी
114
560
हादी सा सुपुP गंगाधर सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.027
273
कुडापासी
61
561
परदेसी माझी सुपुP िनमई माझी और
अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.041
274
कुडापासी
114
562
हादी सा सुपुP गंगाधर सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.036
275
कुडापासी
77
563
बीरा सा सुपुP गंगा सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.034
276
कुडापासी
114
564
हादी सा सुपुP गंगाधर सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.046
277
कुडापासी
77
565
बीरा सा सुपुP गंगा सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.094
278
कुडापासी
50
566
पांचू सा सुपुP गंगाधर सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.077
279
कुडापासी
50
567
पांचू सा सुपुP गंगाधर सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.060
280
कुडापासी
50
568
पांचू सा सुपुP गंगाधर सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.016
281
कुडापासी
50
569
पांचू सा सुपुP गंगाधर सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.016
282
कुडापासी
50
570
पांचू सा सुपुP गंगाधर सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.011
283
कुडापासी
50
571
पांचू सा सुपुP गंगाधर सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.021
284
कुडापासी
95
572
लमी सा सुपुPी कतु सा अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.032
285
कुडापासी
95
573
लमी सा सुपुPी कतु सा अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.016
286
कुडापासी
114/26
574
धुबई सा सुपुP हादीबंधु सा और
अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.020
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2619
(4) Rाम – कुडापासी
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )
s.
सं.
आर.I सeकल/
Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर
मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
287
कुडापासी
95
575
लमी सा सुपुPी कतु सा अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.036
288
कुडापासी
95
576
लमी सा सुपुPी कतु सा अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.122
289
कुडापासी
95
577
लमी सा सुपुPी कतु सा अय
पतीता
0.007
290
कुडापासी
80
582
बैरागी सा सुपुP बुिधया सा और
अय
तैला
0.055
291
कुडापासी
80
583
बैरागी सा सुपुP बुिधया सा और
अय
पतीता
0.036
292
कुडापासी
80
584
बैरागी सा सुपुP बुिधया सा और
अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.148
293
कुडापासी
80
585
बैरागी सा सुपुP बुिधया सा और
अय
तैला
0.027
294
कुडापासी
80
586
बैरागी सा सुपुP बुिधया सा और
अय
तैला
0.031
295
कुडापासी
80
587
बैरागी सा सुपुP बुिधया सा और
अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.035
296
कुडापासी
17
594
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.052
297
कुडापासी
4
595
इ सा सुपुP भगवान सा
तैला
0.025
298
कुडापासी
4
596
इ सा सुपुP भगवान सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.053
299
कुडापासी
4
597
इ सा सुपुP भगवान सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.059
300
कुडापासी
4
598
इ सा सुपुP भगवान सा
तैला
0.048
301
कुडापासी
17
599
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा
तैला
0.091
302
कुडापासी
17
606
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.058
303
कुडापासी
17
607
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा
तैला
0.039
304
कुडापासी
4
616
इ ा सा सुपुP भगवान सा
तैला
0.040
305
कुडापासी
17
617
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा
तैला
0.031
306
कुडापासी
22
618
च सा सुपुP भगबान सा
तैला
0.031
307
कुडापासी
22
619
च सा सुपुP भगबान सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.072
308
कुडापासी
22
620
च सा सुपुP भगबान सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.034
309
कुडापासी
114
621
हादी सा सुपुP गंगाधर सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.090
2620
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(4) Rाम – कुडापासी
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )
s.
सं.
आर.I सeकल/
Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर
मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
310
कुडापासी
17
622
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा
तैला
0.093
311
कुडापासी
4
623
इ ा सा सुपुP भगवान सा
तैला
0.072
312
कुडापासी
22
624
च सा सुपुP भगबान सा
तैला
0.018
313
कुडापासी
22
625
च सा सुपुP भगबान सा
तैला
0.019
314
कुडापासी
17
626
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा
तैला
0.022
315
कुडापासी
17
627
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा
तैला
0.030
316
कुडापासी
4
628
इ सा सुपुP भगवान सा
तैला
0.022
317
कुडापासी
18
629
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा और अय
तैला
0.049
318
कुडापासी
18
630
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा और अय
तैला
0.018
319
कुडापासी
18
632
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा और अय
तैला
0.045
320
कुडापासी
33
633
दुखई सा सुपुP महान सा
तैला
0.072
321
कुडापासी
65
637
पलूनी सा पB नी मोहन सा
तैला
0.119
322
कुडापासी
18
638
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा और अय
तैला
0.035
323
कुडापासी
18
639
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा और अय
तैला
0.066
324
कुडापासी
18
640
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा और अय
तैला
0.064
325
कुडापासी
18
641
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा और अय
तैला
0.070
326
कुडापासी
18
642
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा और अय
तैला
0.011
327
कुडापासी
18
643
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा और अय
तैला
0.012
328
कुडापासी
18
644
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा और अय
तैला
0.011
329
कुडापासी
18
645
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा और अय
तैला
0.008
330
कुडापासी
18
646
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा और अय
तैला
0.028
331
कुडापासी
18
647
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा और अय
तैला
0.013
332
कुडापासी
18
648
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा और अय
तैला
0.025
333
कुडापासी
18
649
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा और अय
तैला
0.031
334
कुडापासी
18
650
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा और अय
तैला
0.059
335
कुडापासी
18
651
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.042
336
कुडापासी
18
652
िखरा सा सुपुP रघु सा और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.043
337
कुडापासी
65
659
पलूनी सा पB नी मोहन सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.127
338
कुडापासी
65
660
पलूनी सा पB नी मोहन सा
तैला
0.097
339
कुडापासी
33
661
दुखई सा सुपुP मोहन सा
तैला
0.109
340
कुडापासी
113
671
ह$र माझी सुपुP दुआरी माझी
पतीता
0.042
341
कुडापासी
113
672
ह$र माझी सुपुP दुआरी माझी
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.040
342
कुडापासी
64
674
हलाद सा सुपुP पांचू सा
तैला
0.445
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2621
(4) Rाम – कुडापासी
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )
s.
सं.
आर.I सeकल/
Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर
मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
343
कुडापासी
114/82
675
सुरे च माली सुपुP नीलय माली
तैला
0.167
344
कुडापासी
32
676
दहाना नायक सुपुP चदल नायक
तैला
0.387
345
कुडापासी
92
682
रासानंदा सा सुपुP बुधई माझी और
अय
तैला
0.090
346
कुडापासी
113
686
ह$र माझी सुपुP दुआरी माझी
तैला
0.115
347
कुडापासी
113
688
ह$र माझी सुपुP दुआरी माझी
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.174
348
कुडापासी
113
689
ह$र माझी सुपुP दुआरी माझी
तैला
0.020
349
कुडापासी
78
692
बुधई सा सुपुP आनंद सा
तैला
0.001
350
कुडापासी
4
738
इ सा सुपुP भगवान सा
तैला
0.023
351
कुडापासी
22
739
च सा सुपुP भगवान सा
तैला
0.031
352
कुडापासी
15
955
केब सा सुपुP जगई सा- और अय
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.011
353
कुडापासी
114/31
956
भागीरथी बहेरा सुपुP नाबाघाना
बहेरा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.001
354
कुडापासी
97
1227
लोचन सा सुपुP जाडु सा
तैला
0.184
355
कुडापासी
53
1233
पतीतापबन नायक सुपुP जयकृणा
नायक
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.040
356
कुडापासी
103
1234
zीिनबास नायक सुपुP बालक नायक
तैला
0.247
357
कुडापासी
114/33
1235
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
तैला
0.337
358
कुडापासी
1
1236
अिभराम नायक सुपुP बालक नायक
तैला
0.241
359
कुडापासी
114/71
1237
िवनय कुमार बहेरा सुपुP सुशांत कुमार
बहेरा और अय
तैला
0.320
360
कुडापासी
114/25
1238
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
तैला
0.161
361
कुडापासी
67
1239
िपताJबर नायक सुपुP बालक नायक
तैला
0.147
362
कुडापासी
67
1240
िपताJबर नायक सुपुP बालक नायक
तैला
0.102
363
कुडापासी
67
1243
िपताJबर नायक सुपुP बालक नायक
तैला
0.015
364
कुडापासी
114/84
1244
सBयभामा सेठी पी घनयाम सेठी
तैला
0.082
365
कुडापासी
1
1246
अिभराम नायक सुपुP बालक नायक
तैला
0.132
366
कुडापासी
1
1247
अिभराम नायक सुपुP बालक नायक
तैला
0.031
367
कुडापासी
1
1248
अिभराम नायक सुपुP बालक नायक
तैला
0.230
368
कुडापासी
5
1249
उछाबा नायक सुपुP बालक नायक और
अय
तैला
0.158
369
कुडापासी
114/41
1250
चैतय नायक सुपुP बैशनब नायक
तैला
0.088
370
कुडापासी
5
1251
उछाबा नायक सुपुP बालक नायक और
तैला
0.075
2622
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(4) Rाम – कुडापासी
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )
s.
सं.
आर.I सeकल/
Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर
मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
अय
371
कुडापासी
114/18
1253
मनोरंजन नायक सुपुP चैतय नायक
तैला
0.091
372
कुडापासी
114/33
1254
zीमांता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरन
सा
तैला
0.036
373
कुडापासी
114/33
1255
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
तैला
0.057
374
कुडापासी
114/33
1256
zीमांता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरन
सा
तैला
0.193
375
कुडापासी
13
1258
केबा सा सुपुP कुंगई सा
तैला
0.206
376
कुडापासी
89
1259
रमेश सा सुपुP नबई सा
तैला
0.074
377
कुडापासी
89
1260
रमेश सा सुपुP नबई सा
तैला
0.094
378
कुडापासी
40
1261
नालू सा सुपुP बौरी सा
तैला
0.164
379
कुडापासी
114/29
1262
जोगे मिलक सुपुP नरो(म मिलक
तैला
0.350
380
कुडापासी
114/69
1263
दुगाG चरन नायक सुपुP पतीतापावन
नायक
घाराबड़ी
0.025
381
कुडापासी
93
1265
राम सेथे सुपुP दुखु सेथे
घाराबड़ी
0.020
382
कुडापासी
63
1266
हलाद माझी सुपुP बौरी माझी
घाराबड़ी
0.022
383
कुडापासी
86
1268
भोलेर सा सुपुP बंगुv सा
घाराबड़ी
0.020
384
कुडापासी
42
1269
िनरंजन माझी सुपुP बीरा सा
घाराबड़ी
0.017
385
कुडापासी
41
1271
िनमई माझी सुपुP ठाका माझी
घाराबड़ी
0.020
386
कुडापासी
114/77
1272
बलभ च धान सुपुP हधर धान
घाराबड़ी
0.019
387
कुडापासी
6
1274
कातु बाघा सुपुP कमार बाघा
घाराबड़ी
0.015
388
कुडापासी
96
1275
लमण सा सुपुP पांछू सा
घाराबड़ी
0.018
389
कुडापासी
90
1277
रमेश नायक सुपुP कािलया नायक
घाराबड़ी
0.017
390
कुडापासी
35
1282
दोलागोTवदा सा सुपुP नेबई सा
घाराबड़ी
0.020
391
कुडापासी
89
1284
रमेश सा सुपुP नबई सा
घाराबड़ी
0.019
392
कुडापासी
114/22
1286
पंचाली बा$रक पB नी भात करण
बा$रक
घाराबड़ी
0.015
393
कुडापासी
114/37
1288
कौया बहेरा पी सुजीत बहेरा
घाराबड़ी
0.016
394
कुडापासी
55
1291
पािबPा सा सुपुP पथानी सा
घाराबड़ी
0.014
395
कुडापासी
34
1293
दुरजु सा सुपुP पथारनी सा
घाराबड़ी
0.012
396
कुडापासी
98
1295
सरबेर मतैरी सुपुP लमी धन मतैरी
घाराबड़ी
0.021
397
कुडापासी
112
1297
सुशांत धान सुपुP िनमई धान और
अय
घाराबड़ी
0.018
398
कुडापासी
114/6
1300
िचतया नायक सुपुP िवबा नायक
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.123
399
कुडापासी
114/7
1301
िखरोदा कुमार महाराना सुपुP जतैया
तैला
0.081
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2623
(4) Rाम – कुडापासी
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )
s.
सं.
आर.I सeकल/
Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर
मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
महाराना
400
कुडापासी
114/8
1302
पंचाली बा$रक पB नी भात करन
बा$रक
तैला
0.061
401
कुडापासी
114/41
1303
चैतय नायक सुपुP बैब नायक
तैला
0.090
402
कुडापासी
114/11
1304
धमाGपाड़ा सा सुपुP पांचू सा
तैला
0.138
403
कुडापासी
114/11
1305
धमाGपाड़ा सा सुपुP पांचू सा
तैला
0.114
404
कुडापासी
114/12
1306
पतीतापाबन नायक सुपुP जयकृणा
नायक
तैला
0.081
405
कुडापासी
114/13
1307
मनमोहन सा सुपुP सुकv सा
तैला
0.057
406
कुडापासी
114/16
1308
हादीबंधु सा सुपुP इकदुिसया सा
तैला
0.045
407
कुडापासी
114/33
1309
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
तैला
0.231
408
कुडापासी
114/30
1314
िबबा राउता सुपुP पूणाG च राउता
तैला
0.093
409
कुडापासी
114/33
1316
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
तैला
0.164
410
कुडापासी
114/33
1317
zीमंता कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.129
411
कुडापासी
114/30
1318
िवबा राउता सुपुP पूणाG च राउता
तैला
0.201
412
कुडापासी
114/34
1319
मीला नायक सुपुP क#तGन नायक
तैला
0.237
413
कुडापासी
114/38
1320
िबनोद कुमार सा सुपुP मधुसुदन सा
तैला
0.090
414
कुडापासी
114/19
1321
गनया रंजन नायक सुपुP िचतया
नायक
तैला
0.158
415
कुडापासी
114/39
1322
आलोक कुमार सा सुपुP v मोहन
सा
तैला
0.066
416
कुडापासी
114/45
1324
मनगोTवदा सा सुपुP दुरजयाधना
सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.036
417
कुडापासी
114/46
1325
नारायण सा सुपुP णाबंधु सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.049
418
कुडापासी
114/46
1326
नारायण सा सुपुP णाबंधु सा
तैला
0.017
419
कुडापासी
114/47
1327
िसबरामा सा सुपुP पबीPा सा
तैला
0.010
420
कुडापासी
114/47
1328
िसबरामा सा सुपुP पबीPा सा
तैला
0.005
421
कुडापासी
114/51
1329
ससिमतरानी धान पी उमाकांत
माझी
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.184
422
कुडापासी
114/53
1330
रमीता सा पी दीप कुमार धान
तैला
0.074
423
कुडापासी
114/54
1331
अिजत कुमार दे-री सुपुP दुयiधन
दे-री
तैला
0.045
424
कुडापासी
114/57
1333
िपताबस सा सुपुP गौरा सा
तैला
0.049
2624
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(4) Rाम – कुडापासी
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )
s.
सं.
आर.I सeकल/
Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर
मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
425
कुडापासी
114/58
1334
सारथी सा सुपुP गौरा सा
तैला
0.046
426
कुडापासी
114/59
1335
zीिनबास सा सुपुP गौरा सा
तैला
0.048
427
कुडापासी
114/60
1336
सुरथ सा सुपुP गौरा सा
तैला
0.038
428
कुडापासी
114/61
1337
राकेश रंजन रऊता सुपुP फूल कुमार
रऊता
तैला
0.101
429
कुडापासी
114/63
1338
राजकशोर दे-री सुपुP महेर दे-री
तैला
0.159
430
कुडापासी
114/81
1339
शांत कुमार सा सुपुP नेPनंदा सा
तैला
0.120
431
कुडापासी
114/64
1340
संतवोना िमzा पB नी नरे कुमार
िमzा
तैला
0.048
432
कुडापासी
114/66
1341
देबा सा सुपुP बुधई सा
तैला
0.056
433
कुडापासी
114/66
1342
देबा सा सुपुP बुधई सा
तैला
0.018
434
कुडापासी
114/66
1343
देबा सा सुपुP बुधई सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.060
435
कुडापासी
114/67
1344
िचनमया कुमार बहेरा सुपुP सुशांत
कुमार बहेरा
तैला
0.159
436
कुडापासी
114/68
1345
िबनय कुमार बहेरा सुपुP सुशांत कुमार
बहेरा
तैला
0.119
437
कुडापासी
114/68
1346
िबनय कुमार बहेरा सुपुP सुशांत कुमार
बहेरा
तैला
0.014
438
कुडापासी
114/68
1347
िबनय कुमार बहेरा सुपुP सुशांत कुमार
बहेरा
तैला
0.067
439
कुडापासी
114/70
1348
सुशांत कुमार सा सुपुP v मोहन
सा
तैला
0.035
440
कुडापासी
114/39
1349
आलोक कुमार सा सुपुP v मोहन
सा
तैला
0.042
441
कुडापासी
114/73
1350
सरोिजनी नायक पB नी अजया नायक
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.015
442
कुडापासी
114/74
1351
ितकान सा सुपुP दुजयाधन सा
तैला
0.111
443
कुडापासी
114/75
1352
टूना बहेरा सुपुP काश बहेरा
तैला
0.096
444
कुडापासी
114/76
1353
िबनय कुमार बहेरा सुपुP सुसांत कुमार
बहेरा और अय
तैला
0.385
445
कुडापासी
114/78
1354
अvण धान सुपुP मोहन धान
तैला
0.105
446
कुडापासी
114/85
1356
कvणाकर महापाPा सुपुP च मिण
महापाPा
तैला
0.097
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2625
(4) Rाम – कुडापासी
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )
s.
सं.
आर.I सeकल/
Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर
मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
447
कुडापासी
84
1357
भागीरथी माझी सुपुP बीरा माझी और
अय
घाराबड़ी
0.011
448
कुडापासी
114/87
1358
सBये धान सुपुP घनयाम धान
और अय
तैला
0.125
449
कुडापासी
114/88
1359
उधाब सा और नरौ(म सा
सारदा अंजलासािचता
ितनी
0.009
450
कुडापासी
114/89
1360
रंजन बहेरा सुपुP रमेश बहेरा
तैला
0.036
451
कुडापासी
114/90
1361
रजत कुमार बहेरा सुपुP रमेश बहेरा
तैला
0.035
जोड़ :
$ाम
$ाम
$ाम
$ाम – कुडापासी
कुडापासी
कुडापासी
कुडापासी
42.488
42.488
42.488
42.488
(5) Rाम – धौराखमान
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी)
s.
सं.
आर.I सeकल/ Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
1
धौराखमान
11
5
घुvदु सा सुपुP बुटु सा
तैला
0.441
2
धौराखमान
43
10
सुदई सेठी सुपुP नंदा सेठी
तैला
0.237
3
धौराखमान
43
11
सुदई सेठी सुपुP नंदा सेठी
तैला
0.340
4
धौराखमान
43
12
सुदई सेठी सुपुP नंदा सेठी
तैला
0.194
5
धौराखमान
45/17
13
मानस रंजन वैन सुपुP हलाद वैन
तैला
0.771
6
धौराखमान
45/12
15
Rाम कJयूिनटी भूिम अ4यO,
हमनिबल के नाम
तैला
0.748
7
धौराखमान
8
16
कतूरी सा सुपुP अरिखता दे-री
और अय
तैला
0.071
8
धौराखमान
45/19
17
बैसनाबा राउत सुपुP पूणG च राउत
तैला
0.149
2626
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(5) Rाम – धौराखमान
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी)
s.
सं.
आर.I सeकल/ Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
9
धौराखमान
45/19
18
बैसनाबा राउत सुपुP पूणG च राउत
तैला
0.121
10
धौराखमान
45/42
20
सुदशGन दे-री सुपुP दांगी दे-री
तैला
0.375
11
धौराखमान
24
21
बालकृणा सा सुपुP भागबत सा
और अय
तैला
0.358
12
धौराखमान
28
40
बैरागी सा सुपुPी सबर सा
तैला
0.479
13
धौराखमान
24
53
बालकृण सा सुपुP भागबत सा
और अय
तैला
1.637
14
धौराखमान
45/12
54
Rाम कJयूिनटी भूिम अ4यO,
हमनिबल के नाम
तैला
0.022
15
धौराखमान
45/17
84
मानस रंजन वैन सुपुP हलाद वैन
तैला
0.267
16
धौराखमान
35
85
िमलू बहेरा सुपुP हधर बहेरा
तैला
0.072
17
धौराखमान
45/45
86
फुल कुमार सेठी सुपुP बौरी बंधु
सेठी
तैला
0.101
18
धौराखमान
45/41
87
िवनय कुमार बहेरा सुपुP सुशांत
कुमार बहेरा और अय
तैला
0.307
19
धौराखमान
45/12
92
Rाम कJयूिनटी भूिम अ4यO,
हमनिबल के नाम
तैला
0.622
20
धौराखमान
45/12
93
Rाम कJयूिनटी भूिम अ4यO,
हमनिबल के नाम
तैला
0.065
21
धौराखमान
2
94
अंतरयामी सा सुपुP धानी सा
तैला
0.079
22
धौराखमान
20
98
पुिनया सा सुपुPी दामबुv सा
तैला
0.136
23
धौराखमान
22
99
बौरीबंधु दे-री सुपुP पानू दे-री
तैला
0.101
24
धौराखमान
20
103
पुिनया सा सुपुPी दमबुv सा
तैला
0.170
25
धौराखमान
45/17
104
मानव रंजन वैन सुपुP हलाद वैन
तैला
0.245
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2627
(5) Rाम – धौराखमान
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी)
s.
सं.
आर.I सeकल/ Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
26
धौराखमान
45/50
105
िव नु बेहरा सुपुP दीनबंधु बहेरा
तैला
0.039
27
धौराखमान
14
224
जयकृणा धान सुपुP दैतरी धान
सारदा
जलसािचता
एक फसली
0.153
28
धौराखमान
45/2
563
भागीरती सा सुपुP नेपाला सा और
अय
तैला
0.037
29
धौराखमान
45/3
566
परनाती बा$रक पB नी नारायण बा$रक
तैला
0.096
30
धौराखमान
45/4
567
पावतM बा$रक पB नी अय कुमार
बा$रक
तैला
0.036
31
धौराखमान
45/8
571
पवGत करन बा$रक सुपुP अनुकूल
बा$रक
तैला
0.036
32
धौराखमान
45/11
574
पंचाली बा$रक पB नी पवGत करन
बा$रक
तैला
0.026
33
धौराखमान
45/12
575
Rाम क# कJयूिनटी भूिम अ4यO,
हमनिबल के नाम
तैला
0.347
34
धौराखमान
45/12
578
Rाम कJयूिनटी भूिम अ4यO,
हमनिबल के नाम
तैला
0.521
35
धौराखमान
45/12
579
Rाम कJयूिनटी भूिम अ4यO,
हमनिबल के नाम
तैला
0.129
36
धौराखमान
45/13
580
िबनोदनी राऊता पी िवाबा
राऊता
तैला
0.151
37
धौराखमान
45/14
581
बसंत कुमार सा सुपुP िब4याधर सा
तैला
0.049
38
धौराखमान
45/15
582
ितकली बेहरा पB नी दामबाv बहेरा
तैला
0.142
39
धौराखमान
45/17
584
मानस रंजन वैन सुपुP हलाद वैन
तैला
0.343
40
धौराखमान
45/19
587
बैसनाबा राऊत सुपुP पूणG च राऊत
तैला
0.120
41
धौराखमान
45/21
588
Rाम कJयूिनटी भूिम अ4यO,
हमनिबल के नाम
तैला
0.595
42
धौराखमान
45/23
589
zीमंत कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
तैला
0.102
43
धौराखमान
45/23
590
zीमंत कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
तैला
0.194
44
धौराखमान
45/23
591
zीमंत कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
तैला
0.101
2628
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(5) Rाम – धौराखमान
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी)
s.
सं.
आर.I सeकल/ Rाम
खाता
सं!या
5लाट
सं!या
कातकारी का नाम
कम
प$रयोजना के
िलए अपेिOत
OेP (हेWटेयर मH)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
सा
45
धौराखमान
45/23
592
zीमंत कुमार सा सुपुP िबु चरण
सा
तैला
0.194
46
धौराखमान
45/29
598
दीपदु कुमार धान सुपुP जडुमिण
धान
तैला
0.114
47
धौराखमान
45/31
600
धीरे कुमार सा सुपुP भाक सा
और अय
तैला
0.440
48
धौराखमान
45/49
612
दीपितरनी बा$रक पB नी बvण कुमार
बा$रक
तैला
0.024
जोड़
जोड़
जोड़
जोड़ : : : :
$ाम
$ाम
$ाम
$ाम – धौराखमान
धौराखमान
धौराखमान
धौराखमान
12.099
12.099
12.099
12.099
सीमा
सीमा
सीमा
सीमा-िववरण
िववरण
िववरण
िववरण: : : :
नैनी कोयला लॉक क सीमा बदु संया 1 से शु होती है, जो "टेट हाईवे संया 63 के (कनारे और गौदूनी नाला के दि.णी
(कनारे पर ि"थत है। जहां से सीमा बदु संया -29 तक जाने के िलए "टेट हाइवे संया 63 (अंगुल टाउन क ओर) के साथ
दि.ण-पूव; (दशा म< आगे बढ़ती है। बदु संया 29 से बदु संया 136 तक सीमा बाएं मुड़के उ@र-पूव; (दशा क ओर बढ़ती
है, और छ<ड़ीपड़ा आरि.त वन पर चलती Cई बदु संया 136 तक पCँचती है । बदु संया 136 से बदु संया ‘क’ तक सीमा
उ@र-पूव; क ओर मुड़के गाँव त<तुलोइ गोपीनाथपुर होकर आगे सवE नंबर 195, 194, 193, 201, 200 से होकर गुजरती है।
बदु संया ए से बदु संया सी तक सीमा उ@र-पूव; क ओर मुड़के गाँव कसीडीहा होकर आगे सवE नंबर 36, 34, 33,
3092, 32, 30, 24, 23, 20, 17 से होकर गुजरती है । बदु संया ‘ग’ से बदु संया ‘ड.’ तक सीमा आगे बढ़ कर उ@र-
पूव; क (दशा म< गाँव थलीपिस से होकर गुज़रती है, जो सवE नंबर 20, 19, 18, 66, 68, 64, 63, 52, 119, 120, 229,
233, 234, 237, 238, 241, 242, 245, 247, 250, 437, 436, 432, 433, 434, 449, 471, 472, 476, 561,
551, 552, 553, 550, 548, 547, 546 से होकर गुज़रती है । बदु संया ‘ड.’ से बदु संया ‘झ’ तक सीमा आगे बढ़ कर
उ@र-पूव; क (दशा म< गाँव कुदापसी से होकर गुज़रती है, जो सवE नंबर 678, 679, 680, 681, 682, 685, 686, 687,
689, 692, 691, 635, 634, 633, 632, 631, 737, 741, 769, 809, 807, 802, 803, 797, 796, 795, 784,
955, 956, 531, 530, 529, 527, 523, 499, 500, 492, 467, 1224, 462, 461 से होकर गुज़रती है । बदु संया
‘झ’ से बदु संया 30 तक सीमा आगे बढ़ कर उ@र-पूव; क (दशा म< गाँव धौराखमान से होकर गुज़रती है, जो सवE नंबर
222, 223, 224, 226, 225, 213, 226, 257, 256, 255, 260, 268, 269 से होकर गुज़रती है । बदु संया 30 से
बदु संया 31 तक सीमा बायL क ओर मुड़के उ@र-पिMम (दशा म< जाती है, जो (क धौराखमान से होकर गुजरती है जो सवE
नंबर 269, 268, 270, 266, 265, 262, 181, 180, 178, 179, 176, 105, 566, 567, 102, 85, 84, 54, 53, 21,
20 से होकर गुज़रती है और छ<ड़ीपड़ा आरि.त वन सीमा पर बदु संया 31 को छूती है। बदु संया 31 से लेकर बदु
संया 35 तक सीमा उ@र-पिMम (दशा म< आगे बढ़ कर छ<दीपादा आरि.त वन पर ि"थत बदु संया 35 से िमलती है । बदु
संया 35 से बदु संया 1 तक क सीमा बायL ओर मुड़के दि.ण-पिMम (दशा म< गौदुनी नाला के दि.ण (कनारे से धारा के
साथ बदु संया 1 से िमलती है जहां से सीमा शु Cई थी।
(1) Oाम: ततुलोई गोपीनाथपुर : सीमा बदु संया -136, ‘क’ और ‘ख’ से िघरी है।
Oाम क सीमा बदु संया -136 से शु होती है, जो (क िQकोणीय जंRशन बदु के पास ि"थत है और सवE नंबर 195 पर
छ<ड़ीपड़ा आरि.त वन सीमा और लॉक सीमा को छूती है। बदु संया -136 से बदु संया ‘क’ तक, लॉक सीमा उ@र पूव;
(दशा म< गाँव त<तुलोइ गोपीनाथपुर से होते Cए सवE नंबर -195, 194, 193, 201, 200 से गुजर कर सवE नंबर -200 पर
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2629
उ@र पूवS छोर पर गाँव क सीमा को छूती है। बदु संया ‘क’ से बदु संया ‘ख’ तक गांव क सीमा सवE नंबर -200, 199,
195 से होकर जाती Cई बदु संया ‘ख’ पर छ<ड़ीपड़ा आरि.त वन सीमा को उ@र- पूव; (दशा म< छूती है। बदु संया ‘ख’ से
बदु संया -136 तक यह त<तुलोई गोपीनाथपुर गांव और छ<ड़ीपड़ा आरि.त वन के बीच सामाय सीमा है।
(2) Oाम: कासीडीहा : सीमा बदु संया ‘क’, ‘ग’, ‘घ’, और ‘ख’ से िघरी है।
Oाम क सीमा रेखा बदु संया ‘क’, जो (क सवE नंबर -36 और सवE नंबर 34 के िलए आम बदु पर ि"थत है, से शु होती
है। बदु संया ‘क’ से बदु संया ‘ग’ तक, लॉक सीमा उ@र-पूव; (दशा क ओर जाती है, जो कसीडीहा गाँव से होते Cए सवE
नंबर 36, 34, 33, 3092, 32, 30, 24, 23, 20, 17 को छूती Cई उ@र-पूव; क ओर गाँव क सीमा सवE नंबर 17 पर
समाU होती है। बदु संया ‘ग’ से बदु संया ‘घ’ तक गांव क सीमा सवE नंबर 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8,
7, 6, 3176, 5 को संवेिशत करते Cए उ@र-पिMम (दशा म< चली गई और िQकोणीय जंRशन बदु से गुजरती है, और सवE
नंबर 2, 1 के साथ आगे बढ़ कर छ<ड़ीपड़ा आरि.त वन सीमा को बदु संया ‘घ’ पर छूती है। बदु संया ‘घ’ से बदु संया
‘ख’ तक यह कसीडीहा गांव और छ<ड़ीपड़ा आरि.त वन के बीच आम सीमा है। बदु संया ‘ख’ से बदु संया ‘क’ तक क गांव
क सीमा दि.ण-पिMम (दशा म< सवE नंबर 1, 30, 31, 32, 36 को समावेश करती है और बदु संया ‘क’ पर सीमा बंद
होती है।
(3) Oाम : थलीपसी: सीमा बदु संया ‘ग’, ‘ड.’, ‘च’, ‘छ’, और ‘घ’ से िघरी है।
Oाम क सीमा रेखा बदु संया ‘ग’ से शु होती है, जो सवE नंबर 20 पर ि"थत है। बदु संया ‘ग’ से बदु संया ‘ड.’ तक,
लॉक सीमा उ@र-पूव; क (दशा म< गांव थलीपिस के बीच से सवE नंबर 20, 19, 18, 66, 68, 64, 63, 52, 119, 120,
229 , 233, 234, 237, 238, 241, 242, 245, 247, 250, 437, 436, 432, 433, 434, 449, 471, 472, 476,
561, 551, 552, 553, 550, 548, 547 और 546 से गुजरकर उ@र-पूव; (दशा म< गाँव क सीमा सवE नं 546 को छूती है ।
बदु संया ‘ड.’ से लेकर बदु संया ‘च’ तक, गाँव क सीमा उ@र-पिMम (दशा म< सवE नं 546, 545, 542, 541, 538,
537, 536, 533, 532, 531, 530, 528, 527, 526, 525, 524, 523 को संवेिशत करते Cए जाती है। बदु संया ‘च’
से बदु संया ‘छ’ तक गांव क सीमा सवE नंबर -510, 509, 498, 414, 413, 412, 411, 410, 409, 408, 407, 406,
403, 402, 401, 119, 96, 93, 89, 86, 85, और 1 को संवेिशत करते Cए पिMम (दशा म< बदु संया ‘छ’ पर छ<ड़ीपड़ा
आरि.त वन सीमा को छूती है। बदु संया ‘छ’ से बदु संया ‘घ’ तक यह थलीपिस गांव और छ<ड़ीपड़ा आरि.त वन के बीच
आम सीमा है। बदु संया ‘घ’ से बदु संया ‘ग’ तक गांव क सीमा दि.ण-पूव; (दशा म< सवE नंबर 1, 2, 3, 578, 577, 11,
15, 16, 17, 18, 20 को संवेिशत करते Cए बदु संया ‘ग’ पर बंद होती है।
(4) Oाम: िबVबाधरपुर : सीमा बदु संया ‘छ’, ‘च’, और ‘ज’ से िघरी है।
Oाम क सीमा रेखा बदु संया ‘छ’ से शु होती है जो िQकोणीय जंRशन बदु के करीब है और छ<दीपादा आरि.त वन सीमा
को छूती है। बदु संया ‘छ’ से बदु संया ‘च’ तक, गांव क सीमा सवE नंबर 1, 162, 163, 164, 195, 196, 197, 198,
199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 367, 368, 369, 370, 372, 373, 378, 379 को संवेिशत
करते Cए पूव; (दशा म< जाती है। बदु संया ‘च’ से बदु संया ‘ज’ तक गांव क सीमा सवE नंबर 387, 379, 378, 377,
376, 375, 364, िQकोणीय जंRशन बदु, 363, 362, 353, 415, 412, 352, 47, 44, 34, 392, 399, 33, 389, 430,
32, 19, 17, 4 को संवेिशत करते Cए उ@र -पिMम (दशा म< बदु संया ‘ज’ पर छ<दीपादा आरि.त वन सीमा को छूती है।
बदु संया ‘ज’ से बदु संया ‘छ’ तक यह िबVबाधरपुर गांव और छ<दीपादा आरि.त वन के बीच आम सीमा है, जो (क बदु
संया ‘छ’ पर बंद होती है।
(5) Oाम: कुडापासी: सीमा बदु संया ‘ड.’, ‘झ’, ‘ञ’, ‘ज’ और ‘च’ से िघरी है।
Oाम क सीमा रेखा बदु संया ‘ड.’ से शु होती है, जो (क सवE नंबर 678 पर िQकोणीय जंRशन बदु के करीब ि"थत है।
बदु संया ‘ड.’ से बदु संया ‘झ’ तक लॉक क सीमा उ@र-पूव; (दशा क ओर कुडापासी के बीच सवE नं 678, 679, 680,
681, 682, 685, 686, 687, 689, 692, 691, 635, 634, 633, 632, 631, 737, 741, 769, 809, 807, 802,
803, 797, 796, 795, 784, 955, 956, 531, 530, 529, 527, 523, 499, 500, 492, 467, 1224, 462, 461 के
मWय से गुजर कर जाती है। बदु संया ‘झ’ से बदु संया ‘ञ’ तक गाँव क सीमा उ@र-पिMम (दशा क ओर सवE नं 461,
िQकोणीय जंRशन बदु, 393, 392, 391, 390, 389, 388, 1318, 380, 379, 365, 364, िQकोणीय जंRशन बदु, 47,
46, 44, 1230, 1229, 1228, 27 को संवेिशत करते Cए छ<दीपादा आरि.त वन सीमा को बदु संया ‘ञ’ पर छूती है।
बदु संया ‘ञ’ से बदु संया एच तक यह कुडापासी गांव और छ<दीपादा आरि.त वन के बीच आम सीमा है। बदु संया ‘ज’
से बदु संया ‘च’ और बदु संया ‘ड.’, गाँव क सीमा दि.ण-पूव; (दशा म< सवE नंबर 1, 1316, 1234, 1235, 1353,
2630
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1236, 1237, 1, 2, 112, 113, 127, 134, 1351, िQकोणीय जंRशन बदु, 1351, 1307, 138, 1322, 139, 1223,
184, 185, िQकोणीय जंRशन बदु, 186, 188, 202, 1309, 204, 673, 676, 677, 678, को संवेिशत करते Cए बदु
संया ‘ड.’ पर बंद होती है।
(6) Oाम: धौराखमान: बदु संया ‘झ’, 30, 31 और ‘ञ’ से िघरी है।
Oाम क सीमा रेखा बदु संया ‘झ’ से शु होती है, जो (क सवE नंबर 222 पर ि"थत है। बदु संया ‘झ’ से बदु संया 30
तक लॉक क सीमा गाँव धौराखमान और सवE नंबर 222, 223, 224, 226, 225, 213, 226, 257, 256, 255, 260,
268, 269 से गुजर कर उ@र-पूव; (दशा क ओर जाती है। बदु संया 30 से बदु संया 31 तक लॉक सीमा सवE नंबर 269,
268, 270, 266, 265, 262, 181, 180, 178, 179, 176, 105, 566, 567, 102, 85, 84, 54, 53, 21, 20 को
संवेिशत करते Cए उ@र-पिMम (दशा म< छ<दीपादा आरि.त वन सीमा को बदु संया 31 पर छूती है। बदु संया 31 से बदु
संया ‘ञ’ तक, यह धौराखमान गांव और छ<दीपादा आरि.त वन के बीच आम सीमा है। बदु संया ‘ञ’ से बदु संया ‘झ’
तक, Oाम क सीमा सवE नंबर 1, 2, 4, 558, 551, 7, 553, 552, 553, 34, 35, 36, 37, िQकोणीय जंRशन बदु, 90,
91, 92, 95, 200, िQकोणीय जंRशन बदु, 201, 202, 203, 219, 220, 221, िQकोणीय जंRशन बदु, 222, को
संवेिशत करते Cए बदु संया ‘झ’ पर बंद होती है I
[फा. सं. 43015/18/2015-एलए एXड आईआर]
राम िशरोमिण सरोज, उप सिचव
MINISTRY OF COAL
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 655.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number
S.O. 1704 (E), dated the 10th May, 2016 issued under sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas
(Acquisitions and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), and
published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, part II, section 3, sub-section (ii), dated the 11th May, 2016,
the Central Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for coal in 912.7892 hectares (approximately)
or 2255.502 acres (approximately) of the lands in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that
notification and the said notice was extended for a further period of one year commencing from 10th May,
2018 vide notification number 1651(E), dated the 17th April, 2018;
And, whereas the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable in a part of the said lands
prescribed in the Schedule appended to this notification.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 7 of the said Act,
the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire the land measuring 912.799 hectares
(approximately) or 2255.575 acres (approximately) and all rights in or over the said lands described in the
schedule appended hereto.
Note 1: The plan bearing number SCCL/Naini Area/Notification/2018/1, dated the 28th December, 2018 of
the area covered by this notification may be inspected at the office of the General Manager, Naini Area, The
Singareni Collieries Company Limited ( A Government Company), H. No. 129 of NAC, Mishrapada,
District Angul -759122, Odisha or at the office of the Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata-700
001 or at the office of Collector and the District Magistrate, District Angul, Odisha.
Note 2 : Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of the section 8 of the said Act, relating to objection to
acquisition, which provides as follows:-
“8. (1) Any person interested in any land in respect of which a notification under section 7 has been issued,
may, within thirty days of the issue of the notification, object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the
land or of any rights in or over such land.
Explanation.- It shall not be an objection within the meaning of this section for any person to say that he
himself desires to undertake mining operations in the land for the production of coal and that such operations
should not be undertaken by the Central Government or by any other person.
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2631
(2)
Every objection under sub-section (1) shall be made to the competent authority in writing, and the
competent authority shall give the objector an opportunity of being heard either in person or by a legal
practitioner and shall, after hearing all such objections and after making such further inquiry, if any, as he
thinks necessary, either make a report in respect of the land which has been notified under sub-section (1) of
section 7 or of rights in or over such land, or make different reports in respect of different parcels of such
land or of rights in or over such land, to the Central Government, containing his recommendations on the
objections, together with the record of the proceedings held by him, for the decision of that Government.
(3)
For the purposes of this section, a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be
entitled to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under
this Act.”
Note 3: The Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata 700001 has been appointed by the Central
Government as the competent authority under section 3 of the said Act, vide notification number
S.O.3347(E), dated the 9th December, 2015, published in part II, section 3, sub-section (ii) of the Gazette of
India, dated the 10th December, 2015.
SCHEDULE
THE SINGARENI COLLIERIES COMPANY LIMITED
Naini Opencast Project, Naini Area
District-Angul, Odisha
[ Plan bearing number SCCL/Naini Area/Notification/2018/1, dated the 28th December, 2018]
All Rights:
(I) Table
Sl.
No.
Name of
villages
Thana
Thana
number
District
Type of land in hectares
Total in
hectares
Total in
acres
Tenancy
Forest
Non-
Forest
Govt.
Remarks
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
1
Kasidiha
Chhendipada
95
Angul
0.961
9.805
0.750
11.516
28.457
Part
2
Tentuloi
gopinathapur
Chhendipada
94
Angul
-
1.461
0.654
2.115
5.226
Part
3
Thalipasi
Chhendipada
101
Angul
20.555
4.207
3.052
27.814
68.730
Part
4
Bimbadharapur
Chhendipada
102
Angul
35.724
51.101
8.873
95.698
236.475
Full
5
Kudapasi
Chhendipada
103
Angul
42.488
56.744
1.716
100.948
249.448
Part
6
Dhaurakhaman
Chhendipada
104
Angul
12.099
16.862
2.652
31.613
78.117
Part
7
Chhendipada
Reserve forest
Chhendipada
-
Angul
-
643.095
0.000
643.095
1589.122
Part
Total:
111.827
783.275
17.697
912.799
2255.575
Total : 912.799 hectares (approximately) or 2255.575 acres (approximately)
1. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Kasidiha :
1 to 16, 17(P), 20(P), 23(P), 24(P), 25 to 29, 30(P), 31, 32(P), 33(P), 34(P), 36(P), 3092(P), 3138, 3176.
2. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Tentuloi Gopinathpur :
193(P), 194(P), 195(P), 196 to 199, 200(P), 201(P).
3. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Thalipasi :
1 to 17, 18(P), 19(P), 20(P), 52(P), 53 to 62, 63(P), 64(P), 66(P), 67, 68(P), 69 to 118, 119(P), 120(P),
229(P), 233(P), 234(P), 235, 236, 237(P), 238(P), 239, 240, 241(P), 242(P), 243, 244, 245(P), 247(P), 250(P),
251 to 431, 432(P), 433(P), 434(P), 436(P), 437(P), 449(P), 471(P), 472(P), 473, 474, 475, 476(P), 477 to
545, 546(P), 547(P), 548(P), 549, 550(P), 551(P), 552(P), 553(P), 561(P), 565, 566, 568, 569, 570, 576, 577,
578, 579, 580, 581, 582, 583.
2632
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
4. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Bimbadharapur :
1 to 437.
5. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Kudapasi :
1 to 460, 461(P), 462(P), 463 to 466, 467(P), 492(P), 499(P), 500(P), 501 to 522, 523(P), 527(P), 528,
529(P), 530(P), 531(P), 532 to 630, 631(P), 632(P), 633(P), 634(P), 635(P), 636 to 677, 678(P), 679(P),
680(P), 681(P), 682(P), 685(P), 686(P), 687(P), 688, 689(P), 690, 691(P), 692(P), 737(P), 738, 739, 740,
741(P), 769(P), 770 to 783, 784(P), 795(P), 796(P), 797(P), 802(P), 803(P), 804, 805, 806, 807(P), 809(P),
955(P), 956(P), 1223, 1224(P), 1225 to 1231, 1233 to 1297, 1300 to 1311, 1314, 1316 to 1322, 1324 to 1331,
1333 to 1363.
6. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Dhaurakhaman:
1 to 19, 20(P), 21(P), 22 to 52, 53(P), 54(P), 84(P), 85(P), 86 to 101, 102(P), 103, 104, 105(P), 176(P),
178(P), 179(P), 180(P), 181(P), 182 to 212, 213(P), 214 to 221, 222(P), 223(P), 224(P), 225(P), 226(P),
255(P), 256(P), 257(P), 258, 259, 260(P), 261, 262(P), 265(P), 266(P), 267, 268(P), 269(P), 270(P), 550 to
553, 558 to 563, 566, 567, 570 to 572, 574, 575, 578 to 582, 584, 587 to 592, 595, 596, 598, 599, 600, 605,
607, 612, 614.
7. Chhendipada Reserve forest: 643.095 hectares or 1589.122 acres.
The details of land to be acquired are given in the table below:—
(II) Table
(1) Village –Kasidiha
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl. No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required for
Project in
hectares
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
1
Kasidiha
44
3
Choudhuri Pradhan S/o Lakhia Pradhan
and Others
Taila
0.136
2
Kasidiha
73
4
Dasarathi Sahu S/o Padmalava Sahu and
Others
Taila
0.176
3
Kasidiha
167
5
Maheswar sahu S/o Dasarathi Sahu and
Others
Taila
0.201
4
Kasidiha
44
9
Choudhuri Pradhan S/o Lakhia Pradhan
and Others
Patita
0.090
5
Kasidiha
44
10
Choudhuri Pradhan S/o Lakhia Pradhan
and Others
Patita
0.041
6
Kasidiha
44
11
Choudhuri Pradhan S/o Lakhia Pradhan
and Others
Patita
0.317
Total :
Village : Kasidiha
0.961
(2) Village – Thalipasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectares
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
1
Thalipasi
8
2
Khiramohan Sahoo S/o Jogendar
Sahoo and Others
Taila
0.607
2
Thalipasi
46/5
3
Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan sahu
Taila
0.133
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2633
(2) Village – Thalipasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectares
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
3
Thalipasi
45
4
Sudarshan Nayak S/o Dibakar and
others
Patita
0.061
4
Thalipasi
45
5
Sudarshan Nayak S/o Dibakar and
Others
Taila
0.178
5
Thalipasi
21
6
Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and
Others
Patita
0.101
6
Thalipasi
21
7
Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and
Others
Patita
0.174
7
Thalipasi
21
8
Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and
Others
Taila
0.243
8
Thalipasi
21
9
Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and
Others
Taila
0.174
9
Thalipasi
21
10
Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and
Others
Patita
0.049
10
Thalipasi
43
12
Santhakumar Sahoo S/o Sukru Sahoo
and Others
Patita
0.118
11
Thalipasi
43
13
Santhakumar Sahoo S/o Sukru Sahoo
and Others
Patita
0.510
12
Thalipasi
43
14
Santhakumar Sahoo S/o Sukru Sahoo
and Others
Patita
0.049
13
Thalipasi
14
15
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Do Fasali
0.542
14
Thalipasi
14
16
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Do Fasali
0.257
15
Thalipasi
14
17
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Patita
0.047
16
Thalipasi
14
18
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Do Fasali
0.198
17
Thalipasi
14
19
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Do Fasali
0.003
18
Thalipasi
21
52
Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.067
19
Thalipasi
21
53
Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.105
20
Thalipasi
21
54
Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.105
21
Thalipasi
21
55
Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.032
22
Thalipasi
21
56
Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.026
23
Thalipasi
21
57
Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.031
24
Thalipasi
21
58
Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.039
25
Thalipasi
21
59
Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.033
26
Thalipasi
21
60
Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.040
27
Thalipasi
21
61
Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.028
2634
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(2) Village – Thalipasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectares
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
28
Thalipasi
21
62
Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.038
29
Thalipasi
21
63
Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.028
30
Thalipasi
17
64
Dalagobonda Majhi S /o Maulamani
majhi
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.106
31
Thalipasi
7
66
Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and
Others
Taila
0.028
32
Thalipasi
7
67
Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.122
33
Thalipasi
7
68
Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.043
34
Thalipasi
7
69
Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and
Others
Taila
0.046
35
Thalipasi
7
70
Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.051
36
Thalipasi
7
71
Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.091
37
Thalipasi
7
72
Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.054
38
Thalipasi
7
73
Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and
Others
Taila
0.040
39
Thalipasi
13
74
Jogi Sahoo S/o Banchha Sahoo
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.091
40
Thalipasi
7
75
Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.178
41
Thalipasi
7
76
Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and
Others
Taila
0.091
42
Thalipasi
20
79
Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.199
43
Thalipasi
20
80
Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.059
44
Thalipasi
38
81
Budhia Majhi S/o Nabagana majhi
Taila
0.221
45
Thalipasi
20
87
Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.460
46
Thalipasi
20
88
Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and
Others
Patita
0.053
47
Thalipasi
6
91
Kanhu Sahoo S/o Aarata Sahoo
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.040
48
Thalipasi
6
92
Kanhu Sahoo S/o Aarata Sahoo
Taila
0.247
49
Thalipasi
27
95
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o.Madhusudan
Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.353
50
Thalipasi
32
96
Bikram Pradhan S/o Judunatha
Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.412
51
Thalipasi
25
97
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.015
52
Thalipasi
25
98
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.012
53
Thalipasi
25
99
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.024
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2635
(2) Village – Thalipasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectares
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
54
Thalipasi
25
100
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.025
55
Thalipasi
46/6
101
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.072
56
Thalipasi
30
102
Bikram Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.190
57
Thalipasi
33
103
Bhagabat gosain S/o Jadunath
Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.031
58
Thalipasi
46/4
105
Jasbant Pradhan S/o Joginath Pradhan
and Others
Gharabari
0.117
59
Thalipasi
9
106
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Gharabari
0.119
60
Thalipasi
25
107
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Gharabari
0.103
61
Thalipasi
44
108
Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.022
62
Thalipasi
46/6
109
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.022
63
Thalipasi
37
110
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.022
64
Thalipasi
30
111
Bikram Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.158
65
Thalipasi
6
112
Kanhu Sahoo S/o Aarata Sahoo
Gharabari
0.146
66
Thalipasi
22
115
Padia Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and
Others
Gharabari
0.087
67
Thalipasi
6
116
Kanhu Sahoo S/o Aarata Sahoo
Gharabari
0.077
68
Thalipasi
21
117
Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and
Others
Gharabari
0.102
69
Thalipasi
21
118
Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and
Others
Gharabari
0.090
70
Thalipasi
25
233
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.002
71
Thalipasi
39
234
Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan
and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.111
72
Thalipasi
39
235
Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan
and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.104
73
Thalipasi
15
236
Dibakar Pradhan S/o Nithyananda
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.052
74
Thalipasi
39
237
Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan
and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.057
75
Thalipasi
39
238
Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan
and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.037
76
Thalipasi
39
239
Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan
and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.056
77
Thalipasi
39
240
Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan
and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.026
78
Thalipasi
39
241
Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan
and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.022
79
Thalipasi
39
242
Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan
and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.013
2636
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(2) Village – Thalipasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectares
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
80
Thalipasi
39
243
Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan
and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.052
81
Thalipasi
39
244
Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan
and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.045
82
Thalipasi
15
245
Dibakar Pradhan S/o Nithyananda
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.003
83
Thalipasi
39
247
Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan
and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.060
84
Thalipasi
46/3
250
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.026
85
Thalipasi
25
251
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.023
86
Thalipasi
25
252
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.039
87
Thalipasi
46/6
253
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.034
88
Thalipasi
46/6
254
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.017
89
Thalipasi
44
255
Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.041
90
Thalipasi
9
256
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.027
91
Thalipasi
9
257
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.016
92
Thalipasi
37
258
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.048
93
Thalipasi
46/3
259
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.034
94
Thalipasi
25
260
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.018
95
Thalipasi
9
261
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.025
96
Thalipasi
25
262
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.028
97
Thalipasi
9
263
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.036
98
Thalipasi
25
264
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.022
99
Thalipasi
9
265
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.022
100
Thalipasi
46/3
266
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.030
101
Thalipasi
44
267
Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.027
102
Thalipasi
46/6
268
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.041
103
Thalipasi
37
269
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.017
104
Thalipasi
44
270
Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Sarada Jalasachita
0.014
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2637
(2) Village – Thalipasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectares
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Pradhan
Ek Fasali
105
Thalipasi
37
271
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.034
106
Thalipasi
46/6
272
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.061
107
Thalipasi
46/3
273
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.049
108
Thalipasi
46/3
274
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.020
109
Thalipasi
9
275
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.043
110
Thalipasi
46/3
276
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.050
111
Thalipasi
25
277
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.063
112
Thalipasi
9
278
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.044
113
Thalipasi
37
279
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.031
114
Thalipasi
46/6
280
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.030
115
Thalipasi
46/6
281
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.052
116
Thalipasi
37
282
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.070
117
Thalipasi
44
283
Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.067
118
Thalipasi
46/6
284
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.022
119
Thalipasi
37
285
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.014
120
Thalipasi
37
286
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.029
121
Thalipasi
9
287
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.036
122
Thalipasi
25
288
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.039
123
Thalipasi
46/3
289
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.041
124
Thalipasi
37
290
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.053
125
Thalipasi
44
291
Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.023
126
Thalipasi
44
292
Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.028
127
Thalipasi
44
293
Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.036
128
Thalipasi
46/6
294
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.035
129
Thalipasi
44
295
Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Sarada Jalasachita
0.049
2638
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(2) Village – Thalipasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectares
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Pradhan
Ek Fasali
130
Thalipasi
44
296
Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.038
131
Thalipasi
37
297
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.088
132
Thalipasi
37
298
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.040
133
Thalipasi
46/6
299
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.026
134
Thalipasi
46/6
300
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.041
135
Thalipasi
44
301
Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.075
136
Thalipasi
37
302
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.068
137
Thalipasi
46/6
303
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.046
138
Thalipasi
46/6
304
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.036
139
Thalipasi
44
305
Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.038
140
Thalipasi
25
306
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.034
141
Thalipasi
25
307
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.033
142
Thalipasi
25
308
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.041
143
Thalipasi
25
309
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.058
144
Thalipasi
25
310
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.044
145
Thalipasi
25
311
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.046
146
Thalipasi
25
312
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.058
147
Thalipasi
25
313
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.043
148
Thalipasi
25
314
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.045
149
Thalipasi
25
315
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.026
150
Thalipasi
25
316
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.023
151
Thalipasi
46/3
321
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.055
152
Thalipasi
9
322
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.026
153
Thalipasi
9
323
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.054
154
Thalipasi
9
324
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.049
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2639
(2) Village – Thalipasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectares
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
155
Thalipasi
9
325
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.060
156
Thalipasi
9
326
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.048
157
Thalipasi
9
327
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.047
158
Thalipasi
9
328
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.049
159
Thalipasi
9
329
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.039
160
Thalipasi
9
330
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.031
161
Thalipasi
46/6
331
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.030
162
Thalipasi
36
332
Birabar Pradhan S/o Madhusudan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.019
163
Thalipasi
46/3
333
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.015
164
Thalipasi
46/3
334
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.033
165
Thalipasi
46/3
335
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.039
166
Thalipasi
46/3
336
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.044
167
Thalipasi
46/3
337
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.034
168
Thalipasi
46/3
338
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.119
169
Thalipasi
46/3
339
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.064
170
Thalipasi
46/3
340
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.045
171
Thalipasi
37
341
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.036
172
Thalipasi
37
342
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.021
173
Thalipasi
46/6
344
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.025
174
Thalipasi
46/6
345
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.035
175
Thalipasi
46/6
346
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.066
176
Thalipasi
37
347
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.102
177
Thalipasi
44
348
Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.036
178
Thalipasi
44
349
Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.039
179
Thalipasi
37
350
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.075
2640
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(2) Village – Thalipasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectares
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
180
Thalipasi
37
351
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.076
181
Thalipasi
44
352
Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.145
182
Thalipasi
46/6
353
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.102
183
Thalipasi
46/6
354
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.083
184
Thalipasi
37
355
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.076
185
Thalipasi
46/6
356
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.032
186
Thalipasi
44
357
Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.029
187
Thalipasi
44
358
Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.028
188
Thalipasi
44
359
Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.041
189
Thalipasi
37
360
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.018
190
Thalipasi
37
361
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.028
191
Thalipasi
37
362
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.035
192
Thalipasi
46/6
363
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.063
193
Thalipasi
46/6
364
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.038
194
Thalipasi
46/6
365
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.056
195
Thalipasi
46/3
367
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.026
196
Thalipasi
9
369
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.025
197
Thalipasi
9
370
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.020
198
Thalipasi
25
371
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.051
199
Thalipasi
46/3
372
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.083
200
Thalipasi
25
373
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.040
201
Thalipasi
9
374
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.043
202
Thalipasi
9
375
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.016
203
Thalipasi
25
376
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.012
204
Thalipasi
46/3
377
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.029
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2641
(2) Village – Thalipasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectares
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
205
Thalipasi
46/3
378
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.023
206
Thalipasi
25
379
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.036
207
Thalipasi
9
380
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.030
208
Thalipasi
9
381
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.023
209
Thalipasi
25
382
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.023
210
Thalipasi
46/3
383
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.019
211
Thalipasi
46/3
384
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.029
212
Thalipasi
25
385
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.024
213
Thalipasi
9
386
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.024
214
Thalipasi
9
387
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.023
215
Thalipasi
25
388
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.026
216
Thalipasi
46/3
389
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.021
217
Thalipasi
46/3
390
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.031
218
Thalipasi
25
391
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.031
219
Thalipasi
9
392
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.028
220
Thalipasi
9
393
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.030
221
Thalipasi
25
394
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.030
222
Thalipasi
46/3
395
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.034
223
Thalipasi
46/3
396
Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.029
224
Thalipasi
25
397
Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.032
225
Thalipasi
9
398
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.030
226
Thalipasi
9
399
Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o
Purendera Pradhan and Others
Patita
0.013
227
Thalipasi
37
400
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.028
228
Thalipasi
37
401
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.106
229
Thalipasi
44
402
Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Sarada Jalasachita
0.064
2642
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(2) Village – Thalipasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectares
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Pradhan
Ek Fasali
230
Thalipasi
44
403
Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.046
231
Thalipasi
44
404
Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.047
232
Thalipasi
46/6
405
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.096
233
Thalipasi
46/6
406
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.078
234
Thalipasi
44
407
Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.083
235
Thalipasi
46/6
408
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.108
236
Thalipasi
37
409
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.111
237
Thalipasi
37
410
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.100
238
Thalipasi
46/6
411
Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o
Choudhary Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.105
239
Thalipasi
44
412
Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.088
240
Thalipasi
37
413
Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.118
241
Thalipasi
14
417
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.128
242
Thalipasi
14
421
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.092
243
Thalipasi
14
422
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.042
244
Thalipasi
14
423
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.090
245
Thalipasi
14
424
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Jalasay Ek
0.014
246
Thalipasi
14
425
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Gharabari
0.086
247
Thalipasi
14
426
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.030
248
Thalipasi
14
427
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.054
249
Thalipasi
14
428
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.034
250
Thalipasi
14
429
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.020
251
Thalipasi
14
430
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.017
252
Thalipasi
14
431
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.076
253
Thalipasi
14
432
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.036
254
Thalipasi
14
433
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sarada Jalasachita
0.026
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2643
(2) Village – Thalipasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectares
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Sahoo and Others
Ek Fasali
255
Thalipasi
14
434
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.027
256
Thalipasi
14
436
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.001
257
Thalipasi
14
437
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.005
258
Thalipasi
14
472
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Gharabari
0.009
259
Thalipasi
14
473
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Gharabari
0.022
260
Thalipasi
14
474
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Gharabari
0.006
261
Thalipasi
14
475
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Gharabari
0.026
262
Thalipasi
14
476
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Gharabari
0.012
263
Thalipasi
14
477
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Gharabari
0.043
264
Thalipasi
14
478
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Gharabari
0.013
265
Thalipasi
14
479
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Gharabari
0.019
266
Thalipasi
14
480
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Gharabari
0.016
267
Thalipasi
14
481
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Gharabari
0.021
268
Thalipasi
14
482
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Gharabari
0.024
269
Thalipasi
14
483
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Gharabari
0.056
270
Thalipasi
18
495
Nandakishor Sahoo S/o Shyam Sahoo
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.034
271
Thalipasi
46/10
500
Digambar Sahu S/o Ratnakar Sahu
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.047
272
Thalipasi
2
501
Uchhab Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.038
273
Thalipasi
3
502
Kamara Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.044
274
Thalipasi
42
503
Mahan Sahoo S/o Kuhuru Sahoo
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.055
275
Thalipasi
3
510
Kamara Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.126
276
Thalipasi
2
511
Uchhab Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.111
277
Thalipasi
42
512
Mahan Sahoo S/o Kuhuru Sahoo
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.062
278
Thalipasi
40
513
Madan Sahoo S/o Kuhuru Sahoo
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.048
2644
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(2) Village – Thalipasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectares
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
279
Thalipasi
23
514
Prakash Sahoo S/o Kuhuru Sahoo
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.051
280
Thalipasi
3
515
Kamara Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.063
281
Thalipasi
2
516
Uchhab Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.092
282
Thalipasi
12
522
Gobardhan Sahoo S/o Anadi Sahoo
and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.190
283
Thalipasi
18
523
Nandakishor Sahoo S/o Shyam Sahoo
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.080
284
Thalipasi
18
524
Nandakishor Sahoo S/o Shyam Sahoo
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.086
285
Thalipasi
18
525
Nandakishor Sahoo S/o Shyam Sahoo
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.088
286
Thalipasi
18
526
Nandakishor Sahoo S/o Shyam Sahoo
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.050
287
Thalipasi
18
527
Nandakishor Sahoo S/o Shyam Sahoo
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.058
288
Thalipasi
12
528
Gobardhan Sahoo S/o Anadi Sahoo
and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.080
289
Thalipasi
23
529
Prakash Sahoo S/o Kuhuru Sahoo
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.023
290
Thalipasi
40
530
Madan Sahoo S/o Kuhuru Sahoo
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.022
291
Thalipasi
3
531
Kamara Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.040
292
Thalipasi
2
532
Uchhab Sahoo S/o kalyan Sahoo
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.043
293
Thalipasi
11
533
Gobardhan Sahoo S/o Anadi Sahoo
and Others
Patita
0.024
294
Thalipasi
11
534
Gobardhan Sahoo S/o Anadi Sahoo
and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.044
295
Thalipasi
24
535
Prakash Sahoo S/o.kuhur Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.019
296
Thalipasi
24
536
Prakash Sahoo S/o.kuhur Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.027
297
Thalipasi
10
539
Guji Pradhan S/o Panu pradhan and
others
Sarada Jalasachita
Do Fasali
0.070
298
Thalipasi
10
540
Guji Pradhan S/o Panu pradhan and
others
Sarada Jalasachita
Do Fasali
0.051
299
Thalipasi
10
543
Guji Pradhan S/o Panu pradhan and
others
Sarada Jalasachita
Do Fasali
0.169
300
Thalipasi
10
544
Guji Pradhan S/o Panu pradhan and
others
Sarada Jalasachita
Do Fasali
0.171
301
Thalipasi
10
548
Guji Pradhan S/o Panu pradhan and
others
Sarada Jalasachita
Do Fasali
0.044
302
Thalipasi
14
549
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Do Fasali
0.050
303
Thalipasi
20
550
Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and
Patita
0.018
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2645
(2) Village – Thalipasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectares
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Others
304
Thalipasi
14
551
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Patita
0.096
305
Thalipasi
20
552
Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Do Fasali
0.036
306
Thalipasi
20
553
Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Do Fasali
0.015
307
Thalipasi
14
561
Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo
Sahoo and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Do Fasali
0.001
308
Thalipasi
20
569
Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.019
309
Thalipasi
20
570
Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and
Others
Taila
0.216
310
Thalipasi
46/5
576
Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan sahu
Taila
0.487
311
Thalipasi
46/5
577
Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan sahu
Taila
0.140
312
Thalipasi
46/5
578
Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan sahu
Patita
0.013
313
Thalipasi
30
579
Bikram Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan and Others
Gharabari
0.132
314
Thalipasi
30
580
Bikram Pradhan S/o Jadunath
Pradhan and Others
Gharabari
0.121
315
Thalipasi
46/7
581
Manoj Kumar Pradhan S/o
Balukeswar Pradhan
Taila
0.028
316
Thalipasi
46/8
582
Kumuda Pradhan S/o Balukeswar
Pradhan
Taila
0.046
317
Thalipasi
46/9
583
Chabila Kumar Pradhan S/o
Balukeswar Pradhan
Taila
0.039
Total :
Village- Thalipasi
20.555
(3) Village – Bimbadharpur
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
1
Bimbadharpur
22
6
Benudhar
Pradhan
S/o
Narana Pradhan and Others
Taila
1.150
2
Bimbadharpur
16
7
Nisamani Sadangi W/o.
Balkrishna Sadangi
Taila
0.387
3
Bimbadharpur
16
8
Nisamani Sadangi W/o.
Balkrishna Sadangi
Taila
0.419
4
Bimbadharpur
22
12
Benudhar
Pradhan
S/o
Narana Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.147
5
Bimbadharpur
22
13
Benudhar
Pradhan
S/o
Narana Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.157
2646
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(3) Village – Bimbadharpur
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
6
Bimbadharpur
22
14
Benudhar
Pradhan
S/o
Narana Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.456
7
Bimbadharpur
22
15
Benudhar
Pradhan
S/o
Narana Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.132
8
Bimbadharpur
29
16
Saroj Naik S/o Sardar Naik
and Others
Taila
0.104
9
Bimbadharpur
34/10
18
Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.
Bishnu Charan Sahu
Taila
0.274
10
Bimbadharpur
34/10
20
Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.
Bishnu Charan Sahu
Taila
0.226
11
Bimbadharpur
34/5
21
Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.
Bishnu Charan Sahu
Taila
0.146
12
Bimbadharpur
34/34
22
Sisir Kumar Behera S/o Kalia
Behera
Taila
0.139
13
Bimbadharpur
10
23
Trinath Naik S/o. Beda Naik
and Others
Taila
0.056
14
Bimbadharpur
7
29
Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishtam
Naik and Others
Taila
0.113
15
Bimbadharpur
7
30
Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishtam
Naik and Others
Taila
0.232
16
Bimbadharpur
27
31
Ratana Naik S/o Kalia Naik
and Others
Taila
0.584
17
Bimbadharpur
20
32
Bikala Bagh S/o. Mulia Bagh
and Others
Taila
0.505
18
Bimbadharpur
34/9
33
Uma Naik W/o. Kalyan Naik
Taila
0.515
19
Bimbadharpur
17
39
Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu
and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.030
20
Bimbadharpur
17
40
Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu
and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.026
21
Bimbadharpur
17
41
Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu
and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.051
22
Bimbadharpur
17
44
Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu
and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.043
23
Bimbadharpur
17
45
Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu
and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.028
24
Bimbadharpur
17
46
Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu
and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.020
25
Bimbadharpur
17
47
Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu
and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.091
26
Bimbadharpur
17
48
Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu
and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.044
27
Bimbadharpur
17
49
Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu
and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.063
28
Bimbadharpur
17
50
Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu
and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.084
29
Bimbadharpur
17
51
Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu
and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.082
30
Bimbadharpur
4
52
Khiramohan
Sahu
S/o
Jogendra sahu and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.079
31
Bimbadharpur
4
53
Khiramohan
Sahu
S/o
Sarada Jalasachita
0.069
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2647
(3) Village – Bimbadharpur
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Jogendra sahu and Others
Ek Fasali
32
Bimbadharpur
4
54
Khiramohan
Sahu
S/o
Jogendra sahu and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.038
33
Bimbadharpur
4
55
Khiramohan
Sahu
S/o
Jogendra sahu and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.048
34
Bimbadharpur
4
56
Khiramohan
Sahu
S/o
Jogendra sahu and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.052
35
Bimbadharpur
4
57
Khiramohan
Sahu
S/o
Jogendra sahu and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.032
36
Bimbadharpur
4
58
Khiramohan
Sahu
S/o
Jogendra sahu and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.057
37
Bimbadharpur
2
59
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.042
38
Bimbadharpur
15
60
Nakofodi
Pradhan
S/o
Sahadeb Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.274
39
Bimbadharpur
8
61
Jadu Pradhan S/o Arakhita
Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.123
40
Bimbadharpur
8
62
Jadu Pradhan S/o Arakhita
Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.121
41
Bimbadharpur
34/8
63
Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.
Bishnu Charan sahu
Taila
0.279
42
Bimbadharpur
8
64
Jadu Pradhan S/o Arakhita
Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.105
43
Bimbadharpur
8
65
Jadu Pradhan S/o Arakhita
Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.106
44
Bimbadharpur
8
66
Jadu Pradhan S/o Arakhita
Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.109
45
Bimbadharpur
8
67
Jadu Pradhan S/o Arakhita
Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.401
46
Bimbadharpur
1
78
Kapil Pradhan S/o. Suna
pradhan
Taila
0.079
47
Bimbadharpur
1
80
Kapil Pradhan S/o. Suna
pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.130
48
Bimbadharpur
1
81
Kapil Pradhan S/o. Suna
pradhan
Taila
0.270
49
Bimbadharpur
31
82
Srinibas Naik S/o Balaka
Naik
Taila
0.308
50
Bimbadharpur
34/17
83
Saroj Kumar Behera S/o
Ragunath Behera and Others
Taila
0.220
51
Bimbadharpur
7
84
Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishtam
Naik and Others
Taila
0.157
52
Bimbadharpur
34/7
105
Satyanarayana
Sahu
S/o.
Bhajaman Sahu
Taila
0.342
53
Bimbadharpur
14
106
Durjodhana Sahu S/o.Pathani
Sahu and Others
Taila
0.119
54
Bimbadharpur
14
107
Durjodhana Sahu S/o.Pathani
Sahu and Others
Taila
0.180
55
Bimbadharpur
14
108
Durjodhana Sahu S/o.Pathani
Sahu and Others
Taila
0.136
2648
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(3) Village – Bimbadharpur
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
56
Bimbadharpur
26
114
Maheswar
Sahu
S/o.
Dasarathi Sahu and Others
Taila
0.517
57
Bimbadharpur
30
116
Sarangadhar
Sahu
S/o
Banguru Sahu
Taila
0.294
58
Bimbadharpur
9
121
Damburu
Pradhan,
S/o.Nityananda Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.288
59
Bimbadharpur
34
123
Hrudanand Dehury S/o Kathi
Dehury and Others
Taila
0.222
60
Bimbadharpur
34
128
Hrudanand Dehury S/o Kathi
Dehury and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.220
61
Bimbadharpur
34
129
Hrudanand Dehury S/o Kathi
Dehury and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.092
62
Bimbadharpur
34
130
Hrudanand Dehury S/o Kathi
Dehury and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.043
63
Bimbadharpur
5
131
Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.188
64
Bimbadharpur
5
132
Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha
Taila
0.163
65
Bimbadharpur
5
133
Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.064
66
Bimbadharpur
5
134
Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.016
67
Bimbadharpur
5
135
Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.071
68
Bimbadharpur
5
136
Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.092
69
Bimbadharpur
5
137
Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha
Taila
0.434
70
Bimbadharpur
3
139
Kishori Pradhan S/o. Nata
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.614
71
Bimbadharpur
33
150
Hatua Behera S/o Madan
Behera and Others
Taila
0.060
72
Bimbadharpur
33
151
Hatua Behera S/o Madan
Behera and Others
Taila
0.045
73
Bimbadharpur
33
152
Hatua Behera S/o Madan
Behera and Others
Taila
0.061
74
Bimbadharpur
33
153
Hatua Behera S/o Madan
Behera and Others
Taila
0.037
75
Bimbadharpur
33
154
Hatua Behera S/o Madan
Behera and Others
Taila
0.030
76
Bimbadharpur
33
156
Hatua Behera S/o Madan
Behera and Others
Taila
0.322
77
Bimbadharpur
33
157
Hatua Behera S/o Madan
Behera and Others
Taila
0.104
78
Bimbadharpur
33
158
Hatua Behera S/o Madan
Behera and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.130
79
Bimbadharpur
33
159
Hatua Behera S/o Madan
Behera and Others
Taila
0.160
80
Bimbadharpur
19
160
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and others
Taila
1.238
81
Bimbadharpur
22
166
Benudhar
Pradhan
S/o
Narana Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.726
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2649
(3) Village – Bimbadharpur
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
82
Bimbadharpur
25
168
Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia
pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.095
83
Bimbadharpur
25
169
Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia
pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.085
84
Bimbadharpur
25
173
Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia
pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.019
85
Bimbadharpur
25
174
Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia
pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.048
86
Bimbadharpur
25
175
Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia
pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.099
87
Bimbadharpur
25
176
Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia
pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.124
88
Bimbadharpur
25
177
Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia
pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.033
89
Bimbadharpur
25
178
Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia
pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.019
90
Bimbadharpur
25
179
Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia
pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.018
91
Bimbadharpur
25
180
Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia
pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.037
92
Bimbadharpur
25
181
Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia
pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.026
93
Bimbadharpur
25
182
Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia
pradhan
Taila
0.062
94
Bimbadharpur
6
183
GopalChandra Pradhan S/o
Benudhar
Pradhan
and
Others
Taila
0.087
95
Bimbadharpur
15
184
Nakofodi
Pradhan
S/o
Sahadeb Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.077
96
Bimbadharpur
21
185
Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga
Pradhan
Taila
0.076
97
Bimbadharpur
2
186
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.100
98
Bimbadharpur
2
187
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.121
99
Bimbadharpur
11
188
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Taila
0.075
100
Bimbadharpur
11
189
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Taila
0.072
101
Bimbadharpur
11
190
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Taila
0.090
102
Bimbadharpur
23
191
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Taila
0.100
103
Bimbadharpur
23
192
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Taila
0.091
104
Bimbadharpur
18
193
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Taila
0.113
2650
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(3) Village – Bimbadharpur
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
105
Bimbadharpur
18
194
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Taila
0.133
106
Bimbadharpur
21
195
Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga
Pradhan
Taila
0.214
107
Bimbadharpur
22
196
Benudhar
Pradhan
S/o
Narana Pradhan and Others
Patita
0.008
108
Bimbadharpur
23
197
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.051
109
Bimbadharpur
23
198
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.050
110
Bimbadharpur
23
199
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.046
111
Bimbadharpur
23
200
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.046
112
Bimbadharpur
23
201
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.042
113
Bimbadharpur
23
202
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.045
114
Bimbadharpur
23
203
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.072
115
Bimbadharpur
23
204
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.029
116
Bimbadharpur
23
205
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.037
117
Bimbadharpur
23
206
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.069
118
Bimbadharpur
23
207
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.027
119
Bimbadharpur
23
208
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.033
120
Bimbadharpur
23
209
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.033
121
Bimbadharpur
23
210
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.028
122
Bimbadharpur
23
211
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.083
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2651
(3) Village – Bimbadharpur
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
123
Bimbadharpur
23
212
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.049
124
Bimbadharpur
23
213
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.036
125
Bimbadharpur
23
214
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.041
126
Bimbadharpur
23
215
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.033
127
Bimbadharpur
23
216
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.048
128
Bimbadharpur
23
217
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.037
129
Bimbadharpur
23
218
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.043
130
Bimbadharpur
23
219
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.021
131
Bimbadharpur
23
220
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.024
132
Bimbadharpur
23
221
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.029
133
Bimbadharpur
22
222
Benudhar
Pradhan
S/o
Narana Pradhan and Others
Patita
0.060
134
Bimbadharpur
23
223
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.027
135
Bimbadharpur
23
224
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.045
136
Bimbadharpur
21
225
Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.423
137
Bimbadharpur
21
226
Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.037
138
Bimbadharpur
21
227
Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.037
139
Bimbadharpur
21
228
Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.037
140
Bimbadharpur
21
229
Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.031
141
Bimbadharpur
21
230
Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.034
142
Bimbadharpur
21
231
Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.045
2652
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(3) Village – Bimbadharpur
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
143
Bimbadharpur
18
232
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.052
144
Bimbadharpur
18
233
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.041
145
Bimbadharpur
18
234
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.033
146
Bimbadharpur
18
235
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.032
147
Bimbadharpur
18
236
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.035
148
Bimbadharpur
18
237
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.153
149
Bimbadharpur
18
238
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.039
150
Bimbadharpur
18
239
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.041
151
Bimbadharpur
18
240
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.045
152
Bimbadharpur
18
241
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.035
153
Bimbadharpur
18
242
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.140
154
Bimbadharpur
15
243
Nakofodi
Pradhan
S/o
Sahadeb Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.143
155
Bimbadharpur
15
244
Nakofodi
Pradhan
S/o
Sahadeb Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.137
156
Bimbadharpur
15
245
Nakofodi
Pradhan
S/o
Sahadeb Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.118
157
Bimbadharpur
15
246
Nakofodi
Pradhan
S/o
Sahadeb Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.116
158
Bimbadharpur
15
247
Nakofodi
Pradhan
S/o
Sahadeb Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.111
159
Bimbadharpur
15
248
Nakofodi
Pradhan
S/o
Sahadeb Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.115
160
Bimbadharpur
15
249
Nakofodi
Pradhan
S/o
Sahadeb Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.047
161
Bimbadharpur
15
250
Nakofodi
Pradhan
S/o
Sahadeb Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.047
162
Bimbadharpur
6
251
GopalChandra Pradhan S/o
Benudhar
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.092
163
Bimbadharpur
6
252
GopalChandra Pradhan S/o
Benudhar
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.082
164
Bimbadharpur
6
253
GopalChandra Pradhan S/o
Benudhar
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.074
165
Bimbadharpur
6
254
GopalChandra Pradhan S/o
Benudhar
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.069
166
Bimbadharpur
6
255
GopalChandra Pradhan S/o
Sarada Jalasachita
0.111
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2653
(3) Village – Bimbadharpur
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Benudhar
Pradhan
and
Others
Ek Fasali
167
Bimbadharpur
34/21
256
Janak Dehury S/o Mulia
Dehury
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.120
168
Bimbadharpur
6
257
GopalChandra Pradhan S/o
Benudhar
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.249
169
Bimbadharpur
11
258
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.059
170
Bimbadharpur
11
259
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.015
171
Bimbadharpur
11
260
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.009
172
Bimbadharpur
11
261
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.016
173
Bimbadharpur
11
262
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.018
174
Bimbadharpur
2
263
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.053
175
Bimbadharpur
2
264
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.041
176
Bimbadharpur
2
265
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.227
177
Bimbadharpur
2
266
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.087
178
Bimbadharpur
2
267
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.101
179
Bimbadharpur
11
268
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.115
180
Bimbadharpur
11
269
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.105
181
Bimbadharpur
11
270
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.070
182
Bimbadharpur
11
271
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.038
183
Bimbadharpur
11
272
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.091
184
Bimbadharpur
11
273
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.098
185
Bimbadharpur
11
274
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.092
186
Bimbadharpur
2
275
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.070
187
Bimbadharpur
2
276
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.107
188
Bimbadharpur
2
277
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.024
189
Bimbadharpur
2
278
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.025
190
Bimbadharpur
2
279
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Sarada Jalasachita
0.023
2654
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(3) Village – Bimbadharpur
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Pradhan and Others
Ek Fasali
191
Bimbadharpur
2
280
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.078
192
Bimbadharpur
2
281
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.023
193
Bimbadharpur
11
282
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.023
194
Bimbadharpur
11
283
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.019
195
Bimbadharpur
11
284
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.023
196
Bimbadharpur
11
285
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.039
197
Bimbadharpur
11
286
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.033
198
Bimbadharpur
11
287
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.044
199
Bimbadharpur
11
288
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.049
200
Bimbadharpur
11
289
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.042
201
Bimbadharpur
2
290
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.052
202
Bimbadharpur
2
291
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.052
203
Bimbadharpur
11
292
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.042
204
Bimbadharpur
11
293
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.015
205
Bimbadharpur
11
294
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.018
206
Bimbadharpur
11
295
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.022
207
Bimbadharpur
11
296
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.020
208
Bimbadharpur
11
297
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.107
209
Bimbadharpur
11
298
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.110
210
Bimbadharpur
11
299
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.110
211
Bimbadharpur
11
300
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.062
212
Bimbadharpur
11
301
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.093
213
Bimbadharpur
11
302
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Taila
0.067
214
Bimbadharpur
11
303
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
pradhan and Others
Taila
0.051
215
Bimbadharpur
11
304
Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka
Taila
0.160
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2655
(3) Village – Bimbadharpur
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
pradhan and Others
216
Bimbadharpur
23
305
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Taila
0.035
217
Bimbadharpur
23
306
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Taila
0.129
218
Bimbadharpur
23
307
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Taila
0.165
219
Bimbadharpur
23
308
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Taila
0.159
220
Bimbadharpur
23
309
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Taila
0.158
221
Bimbadharpur
18
312
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Taila
0.049
222
Bimbadharpur
18
313
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Taila
0.056
223
Bimbadharpur
18
314
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Taila
0.040
224
Bimbadharpur
18
315
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Taila
0.045
225
Bimbadharpur
18
316
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Taila
0.040
226
Bimbadharpur
18
317
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Taila
0.043
227
Bimbadharpur
18
318
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Taila
0.041
228
Bimbadharpur
18
319
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Taila
0.026
229
Bimbadharpur
18
320
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Taila
0.057
230
Bimbadharpur
18
321
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Taila
0.037
231
Bimbadharpur
18
322
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Taila
0.037
232
Bimbadharpur
18
323
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Taila
0.039
233
Bimbadharpur
18
324
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Taila
0.081
234
Bimbadharpur
6
325
GopalChandra Pradhan S/o
Benudhar
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.078
235
Bimbadharpur
18
326
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Taila
0.070
236
Bimbadharpur
21
327
Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga
Pradhan
Taila
0.210
237
Bimbadharpur
15
328
Nakofodi
Pradhan
S/o
Sahadeb Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.171
238
Bimbadharpur
21
333
Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga
Pradhan
Taila
0.161
2656
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(3) Village – Bimbadharpur
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
239
Bimbadharpur
6
334
GopalChandra Pradhan S/o
Benudhar
Pradhan
and
Others
Taila
0.123
240
Bimbadharpur
6
335
GopalChandra Pradhan S/o
Benudhar
Pradhan
and
Others
Taila
0.056
241
Bimbadharpur
6
336
GopalChandra Pradhan S/o
Benudhar
Pradhan
and
Others
Taila
0.119
242
Bimbadharpur
2
337
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.179
243
Bimbadharpur
2
338
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.171
244
Bimbadharpur
2
339
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.114
245
Bimbadharpur
2
340
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.086
246
Bimbadharpur
2
341
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.044
247
Bimbadharpur
2
342
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.028
248
Bimbadharpur
2
343
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.022
249
Bimbadharpur
2
344
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.022
250
Bimbadharpur
6
345
GopalChandra Pradhan S/o
Benudhar
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.044
251
Bimbadharpur
6
346
GopalChandra Pradhan S/o
Benudhar
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.034
252
Bimbadharpur
6
347
GopalChandra Pradhan S/o
Benudhar
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.027
253
Bimbadharpur
6
348
GopalChandra Pradhan S/o
Benudhar
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.030
254
Bimbadharpur
6
349
GopalChandra Pradhan S/o
Benudhar
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.027
255
Bimbadharpur
6
350
GopalChandra Pradhan S/o
Benudhar
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.029
256
Bimbadharpur
6
351
GopalChandra Pradhan S/o
Benudhar
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.051
257
Bimbadharpur
4
352
Khiramohan
Sahu
S/o
Jogendra sahu and Others
Taila
0.112
258
Bimbadharpur
9
353
Damburu
Pradhan,
S/o.Nityananda Pradhan
Taila
0.146
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2657
(3) Village – Bimbadharpur
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
259
Bimbadharpur
18
354
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.042
260
Bimbadharpur
18
355
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.065
261
Bimbadharpur
18
356
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.027
262
Bimbadharpur
18
357
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.076
263
Bimbadharpur
23
358
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.071
264
Bimbadharpur
23
359
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o
Nityanand
Pradhan
and
Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.099
265
Bimbadharpur
9
360
Damburu
Pradhan,
S/o.Nityananda Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.013
266
Bimbadharpur
9
361
Damburu
Pradhan,
S/o.Nityananda Pradhan
Taila
0.049
267
Bimbadharpur
15
366
Nakofodi
Pradhan
S/o
Sahadeb Pradhan and Others
Patita
0.065
268
Bimbadharpur
24
367
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o.
Nityananda
Pradhan
and
Others
Taila
0.394
269
Bimbadharpur
24
368
Baishnab
Pradhan
S/o.
Nityananda
Pradhan
and
Others
Taila
0.022
270
Bimbadharpur
4
369
Khiramohan
Sahu
S/o
Jogendra sahu and Others
Taila
0.277
271
Bimbadharpur
4
370
Khiramohan
Sahu
S/o
Jogendra sahu and Others
Taila
0.079
272
Bimbadharpur
4
371
Khiramohan
Sahu
S/o
Jogendra sahu and Others
Taila
0.066
273
Bimbadharpur
4
372
Khiramohan
Sahu
S/o
Jogendra sahu and Others
Taila
0.158
274
Bimbadharpur
21
377
Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.172
275
Bimbadharpur
21
378
Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.203
276
Bimbadharpur
21
379
Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga
Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.048
277
Bimbadharpur
18
381
Balabhadra
Pradhan
S/o
Maguni pradhan and Others
Taila
0.403
278
Bimbadharpur
2
382
Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha
Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.308
279
Bimbadharpur
34/5
395
Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.
Bishnu Charan Sahu
Taila
0.769
280
Bimbadharpur
34/2
396
Bholaswar Sahu S/o Baguru
Sahu
Taila
0.362
281
Bimbadharpur
34/4
397
Binodini Rauta W/o Vaishnab
Rauta
Taila
0.320
2658
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(3) Village – Bimbadharpur
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
282
Bimbadharpur
34/6
398
Srimant Kumar Sahu S/o
Bishnu Charan Sahu
Taila
0.345
283
Bimbadharpur
34/8
399
Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.
Bishnu Charan sahu
Taila
0.240
284
Bimbadharpur
34/11
401
Gandharba Naik S/o
Kurtartha Naik
Taila
0.267
285
Bimbadharpur
34/11
402
Gandharba Naik S/o
Kurtartha Naik
Taila
0.151
286
Bimbadharpur
34/12
403
Ranjan Kumar Behera S/o
Kandarpa Behera
Taila
0.159
287
Bimbadharpur
34/10
404
Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.
Bishnu Charan Sahu
Taila
0.051
288
Bimbadharpur
34/10
405
Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.
Bishnu Charan Sahu
Taila
0.053
289
Bimbadharpur
34/10
406
Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.
Bishnu Charan Sahu
Taila
0.038
290
Bimbadharpur
34/10
407
Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.
Bishnu Charan Sahu
Taila
0.029
291
Bimbadharpur
34/10
408
Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.
Bishnu Charan Sahu
Taila
0.040
292
Bimbadharpur
34/10
409
Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.
Bishnu Charan Sahu
Taila
0.081
293
Bimbadharpur
34/10
410
Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o.
Bishnu Charan Sahu
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.110
294
Bimbadharpur
34/13
411
Arun Kumar Naik S/o
Harihara Naik
Taila
0.090
295
Bimbadharpur
34/14
412
Sabita Sahu W/o Jagabandhu
Sahu
Taila
0.055
296
Bimbadharpur
34/15
413
Hatakisora Pradhan S/o
Dayanidhi Pradhan
Taila
0.019
297
Bimbadharpur
34/16
414
Sanatana Baga S/o Khiti Baga
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.077
298
Bimbadharpur
34/18
415
Sarathi Sahu S/o Goura Sahu
Taila
0.038
299
Bimbadharpur
34/19
416
Bhagabat Sahu S/o Bala Sahu
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.016
300
Bimbadharpur
34/20
417
Binya Kumar Behera S/o
Susant Kumar Behera and
Others
Taila
0.116
301
Bimbadharpur
34/22
418
Dharmendra Sahu S/o
Rabindra Sahu
Taila
0.108
302
Bimbadharpur
34/23
419
Manoj Kumar Sahu S/o Raj
Sahu
Taila
0.062
303
Bimbadharpur
34/24
420
Ranjita Pradhan S/o
Haramohan Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.011
304
Bimbadharpur
34/24
421
Ranjita Pradhan S/o
Haramohan Pradhan
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.014
305
Bimbadharpur
34/25
422
Binya Kumar Behera S/o
Susant Kumar Behera and
Others
Taila
0.183
306
Bimbadharpur
34/25
423
Binya Kumar Behera S/o
Susant Kumar Behera and
Taila
0.106
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2659
(3) Village – Bimbadharpur
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required
for Project
in hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Others
307
Bimbadharpur
34/25
424
Binya Kumar Behera S/o
Susant Kumar Behera and
Others
Taila
0.044
308
Bimbadharpur
34/28
425
Tukuna Naik S/o Dilaswar
Naik
Taila
0.047
309
Bimbadharpur
34/26
426
Praful Kumar Sethi S/o
Bauribandhu Sethi
Taila
0.049
310
Bimbadharpur
34/27
427
Kuntala Behera W/o
Sachidananda Behera
Taila
0.033
311
Bimbadharpur
34/29
428
Binapani Pradhan W/o
Kalpaswar Sahu
Taila
0.179
312
Bimbadharpur
34/30
429
Gangadhar Baga S/o Bikal
Baga
Taila
0.017
313
Bimbadharpur
34/31
430
Dharanidhar Baga S/o Bikal
Baga
Taila
0.017
314
Bimbadharpur
34/32
431
Sulochana Mahakuda W/o
Bidyadhar Mahakuda
Taila
0.020
315
Bimbadharpur
34/33
432
Rebati Rauta W/o
TanuChandra Rauta
Taila
0.020
Total :
Village – Bimbadharpur
35.724
(4) Village – Kudapasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required for
Project in
hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
1
Kudapasi
114/27
3
Srimata kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Taila
0.291
2
Kudapasi
12
4
Kulamani Naik S/o Bairagi Naik
Taila
0.279
3
Kudapasi
111
6
Sudam Sethy S/o Bashu Sethy
Taila
0.181
4
Kudapasi
111
7
Sudam Sethy S/o Bashu Sethy
Taila
0.072
5
Kudapasi
111
8
Sudam Sethy S/o Bashu Sethy
Taila
0.105
6
Kudapasi
111
9
Sudam Sethy S/o Bashu Sethy
Taila
0.122
7
Kudapasi
107
23
Shriram Sethy S/o Dukhu Sethy
Taila
0.088
8
Kudapasi
94
41
Ruma Majhi D/o Bhagaban Majhi
Taila
0.123
9
Kudapasi
94
42
Ruma Majhi D/o Bhagaban Majhi
Taila
1.011
10
Kudapasi
102
43
Shyamaghana Majhi S/o
Bhagaban Majhi
Taila
0.161
11
Kudapasi
102
44
Shyamaghana Majhi S/o
Bhagaban Majhi
Taila
0.107
12
Kudapasi
102
45
Shyamaghana Majhi S/o
Bhagaban Majhi
Taila
0.081
13
Kudapasi
102
46
Shyamaghana Majhi S/o
Bhagaban Majhi
Patita
0.043
2660
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(4) Village – Kudapasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required for
Project in
hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
14
Kudapasi
68
48
Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi
patita
0.032
15
Kudapasi
68
49
Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.086
16
Kudapasi
68
50
Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.022
17
Kudapasi
68
51
Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.040
18
Kudapasi
68
57
Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.022
19
Kudapasi
68
58
Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.022
20
Kudapasi
68
59
Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.022
21
Kudapasi
68
60
Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.028
22
Kudapasi
68
61
Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.026
23
Kudapasi
68
64
Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.057
24
Kudapasi
68
65
Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.026
25
Kudapasi
68
66
Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.068
26
Kudapasi
68
67
Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi
Patita
0.052
27
Kudapasi
68
76
Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.038
28
Kudapasi
68
77
Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.082
29
Kudapasi
68
78
Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi
Patita
0.145
30
Kudapasi
16
79
Khageswar Mahji S/o Bagaban
Majhi
Taila
0.695
31
Kudapasi
16
80
Khageswar Mahji S/o Bagaban
Majhi
Taila
0.227
32
Kudapasi
77
81
Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu
Taila
0.308
33
Kudapasi
50
83
Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu
Taila
0.307
34
Kudapasi
114
84
Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu
Taila
0.315
35
Kudapasi
66
98
Pranabandhu Sahu S/o Panchu
Sahu
Taila
0.071
36
Kudapasi
66
99
Pranabandhu Sahu S/o Panchu
Sahu
Taila
0.101
37
Kudapasi
114/27
103
Srimata kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Taila
0.420
38
Kudapasi
40
104
Nalu sahu S/o Bauri sahu
Taila
0.282
39
Kudapasi
13
107
Keshaba Sahu S/o Kungei Sahu
Taila
0.080
40
Kudapasi
40
109
Nalu sahu S/o Bauri sahu
Taila
0.205
41
Kudapasi
114/33
115
Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Taila
0.275
42
Kudapasi
114/40
116
Manmohan Pradhan S/o Gadadhar
Pradhan
Taila
0.046
43
Kudapasi
114/8
117
Panchali Barik W/o Prabhat Kiran
Taila
0.085
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2661
(4) Village – Kudapasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required for
Project in
hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Barik
44
Kudapasi
87
122
Mahan Shau S/o Kuhuru Sahu
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.075
45
Kudapasi
87
123
Mahan Shau S/o Kuhuru Sahu
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.157
46
Kudapasi
87
125
Mahan Shau S/o Kuhuru Sahu
Taila
0.164
47
Kudapasi
87
126
Mahan Shau S/o Kuhuru Sahu
Taila
0.143
48
Kudapasi
72
128
Balram Majhi S/o Chaitanya Majhi
and Others
Taila
0.175
49
Kudapasi
73
133
Basudev Sahu S/o Nanda Sahu and
Others
Taila
0.449
50
Kudapasi
43
136
Nilamani Sahu S/o Hari sahu
Taila
0.100
51
Kudapasi
25
137
Choudhary Sahu S/o Nityananda
Sahu and Others
Taila
0.164
52
Kudapasi
43
138
Nilamani Sahu S/o Hari sahu
Taila
0.083
53
Kudapasi
30
142
Jogi Majhi S/o Bauri Majhi and
Others
Taila
0.527
54
Kudapasi
30
143
Jogi Majhi S/o Bauri Majhi and
Others
Taila
0.048
55
Kudapasi
84
144
Bhagirathi Majhi S/o Bira Majhi
and Others
Taila
0.420
56
Kudapasi
81
166
Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda
Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.756
57
Kudapasi
39
179
Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.216
58
Kudapasi
39
180
Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb
Pradhan and Others
Patita
0.024
59
Kudapasi
39
181
Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb
Pradhan and Others
Patita
0.009
60
Kudapasi
39
182
Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.131
61
Kudapasi
39
183
Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb
Pradhan and Others
Patita
0.009
62
Kudapasi
39
184
Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb
Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.177
63
Kudapasi
39
185
Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb
Pradhan and Others
Bagayat Dei
0.062
64
Kudapasi
39
187
Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.043
65
Kudapasi
79
189
Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.030
66
Kudapasi
79
190
Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.045
67
Kudapasi
79
191
Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.017
68
Kudapasi
79
192
Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.017
69
Kudapasi
79
194
Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.383
2662
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(4) Village – Kudapasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required for
Project in
hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
70
Kudapasi
79
195
Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.197
71
Kudapasi
79
196
Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.169
72
Kudapasi
75
197
Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar
Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.018
73
Kudapasi
79
198
Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran
Pradhan and Others
Patita
0.014
74
Kudapasi
79
199
Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran
Pradhan and Others
Patita
0.014
75
Kudapasi
79
200
Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.206
76
Kudapasi
79
201
Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.315
77
Kudapasi
79
202
Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.675
78
Kudapasi
23
204
Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik
and Others
Taila
0.016
79
Kudapasi
114/65
206
Biswanath Sethi S/o Kailash Sethi
Taila
0.145
80
Kudapasi
1
215
Abhiram Naik S/o Balak Naik
Taila
0.232
81
Kudapasi
75
222
Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar
Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.040
82
Kudapasi
74
224
Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.042
83
Kudapasi
74
225
Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.137
84
Kudapasi
75
226
Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.061
85
Kudapasi
75
227
Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.195
86
Kudapasi
75
229
Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar
Pradhan and Others
Patita
0.030
87
Kudapasi
75
231
Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar
Pradhan and Others
Patita
0.031
88
Kudapasi
75
232
Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.113
89
Kudapasi
75
233
Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar
Pradhan and Others
Patita
0.016
90
Kudapasi
75
234
Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.066
91
Kudapasi
81
235
Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda
Pradhan and Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.040
92
Kudapasi
81
236
Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda
Pradhan and Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.039
93
Kudapasi
75
237
Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.044
94
Kudapasi
81
240
Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda
Pradhan and Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.045
95
Kudapasi
81
241
Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda
Pradhan and Others
Patita
0.020
96
Kudapasi
81
242
Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda
Sarada
0.150
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2663
(4) Village – Kudapasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required for
Project in
hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Pradhan and Others
Anajalasachita Tini
97
Kudapasi
81
243
Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda
Pradhan and Others
Patita
0.008
98
Kudapasi
81
244
Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda
Pradhan and Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.086
99
Kudapasi
81
245
Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda
Pradhan and Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.098
100
Kudapasi
81
246
Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda
Pradhan and Others
Patita
0.012
101
Kudapasi
81
247
Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda
Pradhan and Others
Patita
0.010
102
Kudapasi
81
248
Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda
Pradhan and Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.072
103
Kudapasi
81
249
Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda
Pradhan and Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.079
104
Kudapasi
81
253
Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda
Pradhan and Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.116
105
Kudapasi
81
254
Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda
Pradhan and Others
Patita
0.025
106
Kudapasi
75
260
Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.181
107
Kudapasi
75
263
Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.151
108
Kudapasi
75
265
Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar
Pradhan and Others
Patita
0.013
109
Kudapasi
75
266
Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar
Pradhan and Others
Patita
0.012
110
Kudapasi
75
267
Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar
Pradhan and Others
Sarada Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.160
111
Kudapasi
47
273
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.228
112
Kudapasi
47
274
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.233
113
Kudapasi
47
275
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.247
114
Kudapasi
47
276
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and
Others
Patita
0.075
115
Kudapasi
47
277
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.132
116
Kudapasi
47
278
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.106
117
Kudapasi
47
279
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.283
118
Kudapasi
47
280
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.285
119
Kudapasi
47
281
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and
Others
Patita
0.028
120
Kudapasi
47
282
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and
Others
Patita
0.019
121
Kudapasi
54
283
Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Dei
0.091
2664
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(4) Village – Kudapasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required for
Project in
hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
122
Kudapasi
54
284
Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Dei
0.080
123
Kudapasi
114/16
289
Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia
Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Dei
0.021
124
Kudapasi
114/16
290
Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia
Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Dei
0.022
125
Kudapasi
114/16
291
Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia
Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Dei
0.046
126
Kudapasi
114/16
292
Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia
Sahu
Taila
0.011
127
Kudapasi
114/16
293
Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia
Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Dei
0.010
128
Kudapasi
114/16
295
Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia
Sahu
Taila
0.007
129
Kudapasi
54
297
Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Dei
0.065
130
Kudapasi
114/33
298
Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Dei
0.030
131
Kudapasi
54
299
Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Dei
0.027
132
Kudapasi
114/33
300
Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.014
133
Kudapasi
54
301
Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Dei
0.029
134
Kudapasi
54
302
Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Dei
0.089
135
Kudapasi
114/16
303
Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia
Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Dei
0.037
136
Kudapasi
114/16
304
Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia
Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Dei
0.042
137
Kudapasi
114/16
305
Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia
Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Dei
0.098
138
Kudapasi
54
306
Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Dei
0.033
139
Kudapasi
54
307
Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and
Others
Taila
0.044
140
Kudapasi
114/33
309
Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.107
141
Kudapasi
114/86
317
Rathi Sethi S/o Aanand Sethi
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.036
142
Kudapasi
114/86
318
Rathi Sethi S/o Aanand Sethi
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.016
143
Kudapasi
114/73
319
Sarojini Naik W/o Ajya Naik
Patita
0.053
144
Kudapasi
114/33
320
Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.255
145
Kudapasi
47
347
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and
Others
Taila
0.043
146
Kudapasi
47
348
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and
Others
Taila
0.106
147
Kudapasi
47
349
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and
Sarada
0.230
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2665
(4) Village – Kudapasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required for
Project in
hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Others
Anajalasachita Tini
148
Kudapasi
47
350
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.065
149
Kudapasi
47
351
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.186
150
Kudapasi
47
352
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and
Others
Patita
0.018
151
Kudapasi
47
353
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.157
152
Kudapasi
47
354
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.143
153
Kudapasi
47
355
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and
Others
Patita
0.040
154
Kudapasi
47
356
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.121
155
Kudapasi
47
357
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and
Others
Patita
0.029
156
Kudapasi
47
358
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.127
157
Kudapasi
47
359
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and
Others
Patita
0.028
158
Kudapasi
47
360
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.116
159
Kudapasi
47
361
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.121
160
Kudapasi
114/24
364
Baishnab Rout S/o Purna Chandra
Rout
Taila
0.155
161
Kudapasi
114/24
365
Baishnab Rout S/o Purna Chandra
Rout
Taila
0.126
162
Kudapasi
99
367
Sarthi Pradhan S/o Siba pradhan
Taila
0.182
163
Kudapasi
46
370
Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni sahu
Taila
0.259
164
Kudapasi
114/79
371
Manoj Kumar Sahu S/o Gaura
Chandra Sahu
Taila
0.082
165
Kudapasi
88
375
Mahi Dehury S/o Ram Dehury
Taila
0.101
166
Kudapasi
10
377
Kalpataru Dehury S/o Ram Dehury
and Others
Taila
0.114
167
Kudapasi
10
378
Kalpataru Dehury S/o Ram Dehury
and Others
Taila
0.319
168
Kudapasi
114/29
379
Jogendra Mallick S/o Narottam
Mallick
Taila
0.251
169
Kudapasi
58
380
Palau Sahu S/o Natabar Sahu and
Others
Taila
0.397
170
Kudapasi
23
381
Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik
and Others
Taila
0.233
171
Kudapasi
57
382
Palau Sahu S/o Nata Sahu
Taila
0.211
172
Kudapasi
28
386
Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar
Matiari
Taila
0.049
173
Kudapasi
28
387
Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar
Matiari
Taila
0.081
174
Kudapasi
28
388
Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar
Taila
0.201
2666
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(4) Village – Kudapasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required for
Project in
hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Matiari
175
Kudapasi
28
389
Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar
Matiari
Taila
0.207
176
Kudapasi
28
390
Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar
Matiari
Taila
0.051
177
Kudapasi
28
391
Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar
Matiari
Taila
0.067
178
Kudapasi
28
392
Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar
Matiari
Taila
0.102
179
Kudapasi
28
393
Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar
Matiari
Taila
0.099
180
Kudapasi
29
395
Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar
Matiari and Others
Taila
0.110
181
Kudapasi
29
396
Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar
Matiari and Others
Taila
0.193
182
Kudapasi
29
397
Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar
Matiari and Others
Taila
0.050
183
Kudapasi
28
398
Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar
Matiari
Taila
0.046
184
Kudapasi
29
400
Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar
Matiari and Others
Taila
0.109
185
Kudapasi
29
401
Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar
Matiari and Others
Taila
0.089
186
Kudapasi
114/42
402
Pradip Pradhan S/o Trilochan
Pradhan
Taila
0.097
187
Kudapasi
114/43
404
Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Taila
0.164
188
Kudapasi
24
405
Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik
and Others
Taila
0.176
189
Kudapasi
24
406
Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik
and Others
Taila
0.081
190
Kudapasi
24
407
Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik
and Others
Taila
0.038
191
Kudapasi
71
408
Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu
and Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.031
192
Kudapasi
71
409
Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu
and Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.016
193
Kudapasi
71
410
Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu
and Others
Taila
0.019
194
Kudapasi
24
411
Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik
and Others
Taila
0.040
195
Kudapasi
24
412
Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik
and Others
Taila
0.070
196
Kudapasi
24
413
Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik
and Others
Taila
0.029
197
Kudapasi
24
414
Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik
and Others
Taila
0.064
198
Kudapasi
24
415
Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik
and Others
Taila
0.087
199
Kudapasi
24
416
Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik
Taila
0.059
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2667
(4) Village – Kudapasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required for
Project in
hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
and Others
200
Kudapasi
71
417
Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu
and Others
Taila
0.057
201
Kudapasi
71
418
Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu
and Others
Taila
0.043
202
Kudapasi
11
420
Kalandi Shau S/o Sadhaba Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.229
203
Kudapasi
70
421
Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.156
204
Kudapasi
70
422
Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni sahu
Patita
0.020
205
Kudapasi
70
423
Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.160
206
Kudapasi
70
424
Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni sahu
Patita
0.027
207
Kudapasi
114/27
425
Srimata kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.056
208
Kudapasi
114/27
426
Srimata kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Taila
0.162
209
Kudapasi
12
427
Kulamani Naik S/o Bairagi Naik
Taila
0.149
210
Kudapasi
114/33
428
Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Taila
0.035
211
Kudapasi
114/33
429
Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.032
212
Kudapasi
53
430
Patitapaban Naik S/o Jaykrushna
Naik
Taila
0.064
213
Kudapasi
12
431
Kulamani Naik S/o Bairagi Naik
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.062
214
Kudapasi
12
432
Kulamani Naik S/o Bairagi Naik
Taila
0.053
215
Kudapasi
114/48
434
Dhirendra Sahu S/o Pabitra Sahu
Taila
0.018
216
Kudapasi
114/50
435
Pradeep Sahu S/o Jayakrishna
Sahu
Taila
0.037
217
Kudapasi
71
437
Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu
and Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.355
218
Kudapasi
71
438
Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu
and Others
Taila
0.065
219
Kudapasi
114/48
439
Dhirendra Sahu S/o Pabitra Sahu
Taila
0.056
220
Kudapasi
114/48
440
Dhirendra Sahu S/o Pabitra Sahu
Taila
0.036
221
Kudapasi
114/50
441
Pradeep Sahu S/o Jayakrishna
Sahu
Taila
0.070
222
Kudapasi
114/49
442
Khitis Chandra Sahu S/o
Jayakishna Sahu
Taila
0.032
223
Kudapasi
114/49
443
Khitis Chandra Sahu S/o
Jayakishna Sahu
Taila
0.023
224
Kudapasi
114/49
444
Khitis Chandra Sahu S/o
Jayakishna Sahu
Taila
0.045
225
Kudapasi
114/49
445
Khitis Chandra Sahu S/o
Jayakishna Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.029
226
Kudapasi
114/45
446
Managovinda Sahu S/o
Durjyadhana Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.041
2668
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(4) Village – Kudapasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required for
Project in
hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
227
Kudapasi
109
447
Sukhila Sahu S/o Baira Sahu and
Others
Taila
0.023
228
Kudapasi
109
448
Sukhila Sahu S/o Baira Sahu and
Others
Taila
0.025
229
Kudapasi
109
449
Sukhila Sahu S/o Baira Sahu and
Others
Taila
0.015
230
Kudapasi
109
450
Sukhila Sahu S/o Baira Sahu and
Others
Taila
0.021
231
Kudapasi
43
452
Nilamani Sahu S/o Hari sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.041
232
Kudapasi
43
453
Nilamani Sahu S/o Hari sahu
Taila
0.018
233
Kudapasi
114/43
454
Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Taila
0.050
234
Kudapasi
114/43
499
Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Taila
0.018
235
Kudapasi
108
500
Sukanti Naik W/o Chaitanya Naik
Taila
0.141
236
Kudapasi
114/43
501
Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Taila
0.022
237
Kudapasi
114/43
502
Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Taila
0.037
238
Kudapasi
114/43
503
Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Taila
0.053
239
Kudapasi
24
504
Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik
and Others
Taila
0.061
240
Kudapasi
114/43
505
Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Taila
0.058
241
Kudapasi
114/43
506
Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Taila
0.040
242
Kudapasi
114/43
507
Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Taila
0.072
243
Kudapasi
52
531
Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.050
244
Kudapasi
52
532
Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.077
245
Kudapasi
52
533
Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.014
246
Kudapasi
52
534
Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.062
247
Kudapasi
52
535
Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.103
248
Kudapasi
52
536
Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.119
249
Kudapasi
52
537
Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu
Patita
0.025
250
Kudapasi
114/48
538
Dhirendra Sahu S/o Pabitra Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.025
251
Kudapasi
114/45
539
Managovinda Sahu S/o
Durjyadhana Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.070
252
Kudapasi
50
540
Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.039
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2669
(4) Village – Kudapasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required for
Project in
hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
253
Kudapasi
77
541
Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.018
254
Kudapasi
77
542
Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.018
255
Kudapasi
77
543
Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.009
256
Kudapasi
50
544
Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.011
257
Kudapasi
95
545
Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.012
258
Kudapasi
50
546
Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.015
259
Kudapasi
50
547
Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.012
260
Kudapasi
95
548
Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.022
261
Kudapasi
95
549
Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.022
262
Kudapasi
50
550
Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.084
263
Kudapasi
77
551
Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.081
264
Kudapasi
114
552
Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.027
265
Kudapasi
50
553
Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.035
266
Kudapasi
114/26
554
Dhobei Sahu S/o Hadibandhu Sahu
and Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.020
267
Kudapasi
61
555
Pradeshi Majhi S/o Nimei Majhi
and Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.094
268
Kudapasi
77
556
Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.097
269
Kudapasi
114
557
Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.132
270
Kudapasi
77
558
Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.044
271
Kudapasi
114
559
Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.013
272
Kudapasi
114
560
Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.027
273
Kudapasi
61
561
Pradeshi Majhi S/o Nimei Majhi
and Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.041
274
Kudapasi
114
562
Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.036
275
Kudapasi
77
563
Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.034
276
Kudapasi
114
564
Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.046
277
Kudapasi
77
565
Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.094
2670
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(4) Village – Kudapasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required for
Project in
hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
278
Kudapasi
50
566
Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.077
279
Kudapasi
50
567
Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.060
280
Kudapasi
50
568
Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.016
281
Kudapasi
50
569
Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.016
282
Kudapasi
50
570
Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.011
283
Kudapasi
50
571
Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.021
284
Kudapasi
95
572
Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.032
285
Kudapasi
95
573
Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.016
286
Kudapasi
114/26
574
Dhobei Sahu S/o Hadibandhu Sahu
and Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.020
287
Kudapasi
95
575
Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.036
288
Kudapasi
95
576
Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.122
289
Kudapasi
95
577
Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and
Others
Patita
0.007
290
Kudapasi
80
582
Bairagi Sahu S/o Budhiya Sahu
and Others
Taila
0.055
291
Kudapasi
80
583
Bairagi Sahu S/o Budhiya Sahu
and Others
Patita
0.036
292
Kudapasi
80
584
Bairagi Sahu S/o Budhiya Sahu
and Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.148
293
Kudapasi
80
585
Bairagi Sahu S/o Budhiya Sahu
and Others
Taila
0.027
294
Kudapasi
80
586
Bairagi Sahu S/o Budhiya Sahu
and Others
Taila
0.031
295
Kudapasi
80
587
Bairagi Sahu S/o Budhiya Sahu
and Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.035
296
Kudapasi
17
594
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.052
297
Kudapasi
4
595
Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu
Taila
0.025
298
Kudapasi
4
596
Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.053
299
Kudapasi
4
597
Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.059
300
Kudapasi
4
598
Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu
Taila
0.048
301
Kudapasi
17
599
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu
Taila
0.091
302
Kudapasi
17
606
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.058
303
Kudapasi
17
607
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu
Taila
0.039
304
Kudapasi
4
616
Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu
Taila
0.040
305
Kudapasi
17
617
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu
Taila
0.031
306
Kudapasi
22
618
Chandra Sahu S/o Bhagaban Sahu
Taila
0.031
307
Kudapasi
22
619
Chandra Sahu S/o Bhagaban Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.072
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2671
(4) Village – Kudapasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required for
Project in
hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
308
Kudapasi
22
620
Chandra Sahu S/o Bhagaban Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.034
309
Kudapasi
114
621
Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.090
310
Kudapasi
17
622
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu
Taila
0.093
311
Kudapasi
4
623
Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu
Taila
0.072
312
Kudapasi
22
624
Chandra Sahu S/o Bhagaban Sahu
Taila
0.018
313
Kudapasi
22
625
Chandra Sahu S/o Bhagaban Sahu
Taila
0.019
314
Kudapasi
17
626
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu
Taila
0.022
315
Kudapasi
17
627
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu
Taila
0.030
316
Kudapasi
4
628
Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu
Taila
0.022
317
Kudapasi
18
629
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and
Others
Taila
0.049
318
Kudapasi
18
630
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and
Others
Taila
0.018
319
Kudapasi
18
632
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and
Others
Taila
0.045
320
Kudapasi
33
633
Dukhia Sahu S/o Mahan Sahu
Taila
0.072
321
Kudapasi
65
637
Paluni Sahu W/o Mohan Sahu
Taila
0.119
322
Kudapasi
18
638
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and
Others
Taila
0.035
323
Kudapasi
18
639
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and
Others
Taila
0.066
324
Kudapasi
18
640
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and
Others
Taila
0.064
325
Kudapasi
18
641
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and
Others
Taila
0.070
326
Kudapasi
18
642
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and
Others
Taila
0.011
327
Kudapasi
18
643
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and
Others
Taila
0.012
328
Kudapasi
18
644
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and
Others
Taila
0.011
329
Kudapasi
18
645
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and
Others
Taila
0.008
330
Kudapasi
18
646
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and
Others
Taila
0.028
331
Kudapasi
18
647
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and
Others
Taila
0.013
332
Kudapasi
18
648
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and
Others
Taila
0.025
333
Kudapasi
18
649
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and
Others
Taila
0.031
334
Kudapasi
18
650
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and
Others
Taila
0.059
335
Kudapasi
18
651
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.042
336
Kudapasi
18
652
Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.043
337
Kudapasi
65
659
Paluni Sahu W/o Mohan Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.127
338
Kudapasi
65
660
Paluni Sahu W/o Mohan Sahu
Taila
0.097
339
Kudapasi
33
661
Dukhia Sahu S/o Mahan Sahu
Taila
0.109
2672
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(4) Village – Kudapasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required for
Project in
hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
340
Kudapasi
113
671
Hari Mahji S/o Duari Mahji
Patita
0.042
341
Kudapasi
113
672
Hari Mahji S/o Duari Mahji
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.040
342
Kudapasi
64
674
Prahalad sahu S/o Panchu Sahu
Taila
0.445
343
Kudapasi
114/82
675
Surendra Chandra mali S/o Nilay
mali
Taila
0.167
344
Kudapasi
32
676
Dahana Naik S/o Chandal Naik
Taila
0.387
345
Kudapasi
92
682
Rasananda Sahu S/o Buddhia
Majhi and Others
Taila
0.090
346
Kudapasi
113
686
Hari Mahji S/o Duari Mahji
Taila
0.115
347
Kudapasi
113
688
Hari Mahji S/o Duari Mahji
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.174
348
Kudapasi
113
689
Hari Mahji S/o Duari Mahji
Taila
0.020
349
Kudapasi
78
692
Budhia Sahu S/o Anand Sahu
Taila
0.001
350
Kudapasi
4
738
Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu
Taila
0.023
351
Kudapasi
22
739
Chandra Sahu S/o Bhagaban Sahu
Taila
0.031
352
Kudapasi
15
955
Keshab Sahu S/o Jagei sahu and
Others
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.011
353
Kudapasi
114/31
956
Bhaghirathi Behera S/o Nabaghana
Behera
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.001
354
Kudapasi
97
1227
Lochan Sahu S/o Jadu Sahu
Taila
0.184
355
Kudapasi
53
1233
Patitapaban Naik S/o Jaykrushna
Naik
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.040
356
Kudapasi
103
1234
Srinibas Naik S/o Balak Naik
Taila
0.247
357
Kudapasi
114/33
1235
Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Taila
0.337
358
Kudapasi
1
1236
Abhiram Naik S/o Balak Naik
Taila
0.241
359
Kudapasi
114/71
1237
Vinay Kumar Behera S/o Sushant
Kumar Behera and Others
Taila
0.320
360
Kudapasi
114/25
1238
Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Taila
0.161
361
Kudapasi
67
1239
Pitambar Naik S/o Balak Naik
Taila
0.147
362
Kudapasi
67
1240
Pitambar Naik S/o Balak Naik
Taila
0.102
363
Kudapasi
67
1243
Pitambar Naik S/o Balak Naik
Taila
0.015
364
Kudapasi
114/84
1244
Satyabhama Sethi W/o
Ghanashyam Sethi
Taila
0.082
365
Kudapasi
1
1246
Abhiram Naik S/o Balak Naik
Taila
0.132
366
Kudapasi
1
1247
Abhiram Naik S/o Balak Naik
Taila
0.031
367
Kudapasi
1
1248
Abhiram Naik S/o Balak Naik
Taila
0.230
368
Kudapasi
5
1249
Uchhaba Naik S/o Balak Naik and
Others
Taila
0.158
369
Kudapasi
114/41
1250
Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnab Naik
Taila
0.088
370
Kudapasi
5
1251
Uchhaba Naik S/o Balak Naik and
Others
Taila
0.075
371
Kudapasi
114/18
1253
Manorajan Naik S/o Chaitanya
Naik
Taila
0.091
372
Kudapasi
114/33
1254
Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Taila
0.036
373
Kudapasi
114/33
1255
Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Taila
0.057
374
Kudapasi
114/33
1256
Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Taila
0.193
375
Kudapasi
13
1258
Keshaba Sahu S/o Kungei Sahu
Taila
0.206
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2673
(4) Village – Kudapasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required for
Project in
hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
376
Kudapasi
89
1259
Ramesh Sahu S/o Nabei Sahu
Taila
0.074
377
Kudapasi
89
1260
Ramesh Sahu S/o Nabei Sahu
Taila
0.094
378
Kudapasi
40
1261
Nalu sahu S/o Bauri sahu
Taila
0.164
379
Kudapasi
114/29
1262
Jogendra Mallick S/o Narottam
Mallick
Taila
0.350
380
Kudapasi
114/69
1263
Durga Charan nayak S/o
Patitapawan Nayak
Gharabari
0.025
381
Kudapasi
93
1265
Ram Sethy S/o Dukhu Sethy
Gharabari
0.020
382
Kudapasi
63
1266
Prahlad Majhi S/o Bauri Majhi
Gharabari
0.022
383
Kudapasi
86
1268
Bholeswar Sahu S/o Banguru
Sahu
Gharabari
0.020
384
Kudapasi
42
1269
Niranjan Majhi S/o Bira Majhi
Gharabari
0.017
385
Kudapasi
41
1271
Nimei Majhi S/o Thaka Majhi
Gharabari
0.020
386
Kudapasi
114/77
1272
Bhallabh Chandra Pradhan S/o
Haldhar Pradhan
Gharabari
0.019
387
Kudapasi
6
1274
Kastu Bagha S/o Kamar Bagha
Gharabari
0.015
388
Kudapasi
96
1275
Lachhaman Sahu S/o Panchu Sahu
Gharabari
0.018
389
Kudapasi
90
1277
Ramesh Naik S/o Kalia Naik
Gharabari
0.017
390
Kudapasi
35
1282
Dolagovinda Sahu S/o Nabei Sahu
Gharabari
0.020
391
Kudapasi
89
1284
Ramesh Sahu S/o Nabei Sahu
Gharabari
0.019
392
Kudapasi
114/22
1286
Panchali Barik W/o Prabhat Kiran
Barik
Gharabari
0.015
393
Kudapasi
114/37
1288
Kaushalya Behera W/o Sujit
Behera
Gharabari
0.016
394
Kudapasi
55
1291
Pabitra Sahu S/o Pathani Sahu
Gharabari
0.014
395
Kudapasi
34
1293
Duruju Sahu S/o Pathani Sahu
Gharabari
0.012
396
Kudapasi
98
1295
Sarbeswar Matiari S/o Laxmi Dhar
Matiari
Gharabari
0.021
397
Kudapasi
112
1297
Sushant Pradhan S/o Nimei
Pradhan and Others
Gharabari
0.018
398
Kudapasi
114/6
1300
Chitanya Naik S/o Vishnaba Naik
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.123
399
Kudapasi
114/7
1301
Khiroda Kumar Maharana S/o Jatia
Maharana
Taila
0.081
400
Kudapasi
114/8
1302
Panchali Barik W/o Prabhat Kiran
Barik
Taila
0.061
401
Kudapasi
114/41
1303
Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnab Naik
Taila
0.090
402
Kudapasi
114/11
1304
Dharmapada Sahu S/o Panchu
Sahu
Taila
0.138
403
Kudapasi
114/11
1305
Dharmapada Sahu S/o Panchu
Sahu
Taila
0.114
404
Kudapasi
114/12
1306
Patitapaban Naik S/o Jayakrushna
Naik
Taila
0.081
405
Kudapasi
114/13
1307
Manmohan Sahu S/o Sukru Sahu
Taila
0.057
406
Kudapasi
114/16
1308
Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia
Sahu
Taila
0.045
407
Kudapasi
114/33
1309
Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Taila
0.231
408
Kudapasi
114/30
1314
Vishnaba Rauta S/o Purna Chandra
Rauta
Taila
0.093
409
Kudapasi
114/33
1316
Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Taila
0.164
2674
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(4) Village – Kudapasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required for
Project in
hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
410
Kudapasi
114/33
1317
Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.129
411
Kudapasi
114/30
1318
Vishnaba Rauta S/o Purna Chandra
Rauta
Taila
0.201
412
Kudapasi
114/34
1319
Pramila Naik S/o Kirtan Naik
Taila
0.237
413
Kudapasi
114/38
1320
Binod Kumar Sahu S/o
Madhusudhan Sahu
Taila
0.090
414
Kudapasi
114/19
1321
Ganya ranjan Naik S/o Chitanya
Naik
Taila
0.158
415
Kudapasi
114/39
1322
Alok Kumar Sahu S/o
Rudramohan Sahu
Taila
0.066
416
Kudapasi
114/45
1324
Managovinda Sahu S/o
Durjyadhana Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.036
417
Kudapasi
114/46
1325
Narayana Sahu S/o Pranabandhu
Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.049
418
Kudapasi
114/46
1326
Narayana Sahu S/o Pranabandhu
Sahu
Taila
0.017
419
Kudapasi
114/47
1327
Sibarama Sahu S/o Pabitra Sahu
Taila
0.010
420
Kudapasi
114/47
1328
Sibarama Sahu S/o Pabitra Sahu
Taila
0.005
421
Kudapasi
114/51
1329
Sasmitarani Pradhan W/o Umakant
Majhi
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.184
422
Kudapasi
114/53
1330
Rasmita Sahu W/o Pradip Kumar
Pradhan
Taila
0.074
423
Kudapasi
114/54
1331
Ajit Kumar Dehuri S/o Duryadhan
Dehuri
Taila
0.045
424
Kudapasi
114/57
1333
Pitabas Sahu S/o Gaura Sahu
Taila
0.049
425
Kudapasi
114/58
1334
Sarathi Sahu S/o Gaura Sahu
Taila
0.046
426
Kudapasi
114/59
1335
Srinibas Sahu S/o Gaura Sahu
Taila
0.048
427
Kudapasi
114/60
1336
Surath Sahu S/o Gaura Sahu
Taila
0.038
428
Kudapasi
114/61
1337
Rakesh Ranjan Rauta S/o Prafful
Kumar Rauta
Taila
0.101
429
Kudapasi
114/63
1338
Rajkishor Dehuri S/o Maheswar
Dehuri
Taila
0.159
430
Kudapasi
114/81
1339
Prasant Kumar Sahu S/o
Netrananda Sahu
Taila
0.120
431
Kudapasi
114/64
1340
Santwona Mishra W/o Narendra
Kumar Mishra
Taila
0.048
432
Kudapasi
114/66
1341
Deba Sahu S/o Budhia Sahu
Taila
0.056
433
Kudapasi
114/66
1342
Deba Sahu S/o Budhia Sahu
Taila
0.018
434
Kudapasi
114/66
1343
Deba Sahu S/o Budhia Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.060
435
Kudapasi
114/67
1344
Chinmaya Kumar Behera S/o
Susant Kumar Behera
Taila
0.159
436
Kudapasi
114/68
1345
Binya Kumar Behera S/o Susant
Kumar Behera
Taila
0.119
437
Kudapasi
114/68
1346
Binya Kumar Behera S/o Susant
Kumar Behera
Taila
0.014
438
Kudapasi
114/68
1347
Binya Kumar Behera S/o Susant
Kumar Behera
Taila
0.067
439
Kudapasi
114/70
1348
Susant Kumar Sahu S/o
Rudramohan Sahu
Taila
0.035
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2675
(4) Village – Kudapasi
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area
Required for
Project in
hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
440
Kudapasi
114/39
1349
Alok Kumar Sahu S/o
Rudramohan Sahu
Taila
0.042
441
Kudapasi
114/73
1350
Sarojini Naik W/o Ajya Naik
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.015
442
Kudapasi
114/74
1351
Tikan Sahu S/o Dujyadhan Sahu
Taila
0.111
443
Kudapasi
114/75
1352
Tuna Behera S/o Prakash Behera
Taila
0.096
444
Kudapasi
114/76
1353
Binya Kumar Behera S/o Susant
Kumar Behera and Others
Taila
0.385
445
Kudapasi
114/78
1354
Arun Pradhan S/o Mohan Pradhan
Taila
0.105
446
Kudapasi
114/85
1356
Karunakar Mahapatra S/o
Chandramani Mahapatra
Taila
0.097
447
Kudapasi
84
1357
Bhagirathi Majhi S/o Bira Majhi
and Others
Gharabari
0.011
448
Kudapasi
114/87
1358
Satyananda Pradhan S/o
Ghanashyama Pradhan and Others
Taila
0.125
449
Kudapasi
114/88
1359
Uddhab Sahu S/o Narottam Sahu
Sarada
Anajalasachita Tini
0.009
450
Kudapasi
114/89
1360
Ranjan Behera S/o Ramesh Behera
Taila
0.036
451
Kudapasi
114/90
1361
Rajat Kumar Behera S/o Ramesh
Behera
Taila
0.035
Total :
Village – Kudapasi
42.488
(5) Village – Dhaurakhaman
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area Required
for Project in
hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
1
Dhaurakhaman
11
5
Ghurudu Sahu S/o Butu Sahu
Taila
0.441
2
Dhaurakhaman
43
10
Sudaie Sethi S/o Nanda Sethi
Taila
0.237
3
Dhaurakhaman
43
11
Sudaie Sethi S/o Nanda Sethi
Taila
0.340
4
Dhaurakhaman
43
12
Sudaie Sethi S/o Nanda Sethi
Taila
0.194
5
Dhaurakhaman
45/17
13
Manas Ranjan Swain S/o Prahlad
Swain
Taila
0.771
6
Dhaurakhaman
45/12
15
Village community land in the
name of President, Brahmanbil.
Taila
0.748
7
Dhaurakhaman
8
16
Kasturi Sahu S/o Arkhita Dehuri
and Others
Taila
0.071
8
Dhaurakhaman
45/19
17
Baisnaba Rout S/o Purna Chandra
Rout
Taila
0.149
9
Dhaurakhaman
45/19
18
Baisnaba Rout S/o Purna Chandra
Rout
Taila
0.121
10
Dhaurakhaman
45/42
20
Sudarshan Dehuri S/o Dangi
Dehuri
Taila
0.375
11
Dhaurakhaman
24
21
Balakrishna Sahu S/o Bhagabat
Sahu and Others
Taila
0.358
12
Dhaurakhaman
28
40
Bairagi Sahu D/o Sabar Sahu
Taila
0.479
13
Dhaurakhaman
24
53
Balakrishna Sahu S/o Bhagabat
Sahu and Others
Taila
1.637
14
Dhaurakhaman
45/12
54
Village community land in the
name of President, Brahmanbil.
Taila
0.022
15
Dhaurakhaman
45/17
84
Manas Ranjan Swain S/o Prahlad
Swain
Taila
0.267
2676
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(5) Village – Dhaurakhaman
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area Required
for Project in
hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
16
Dhaurakhaman
35
85
Milu Behera S/o Haldhar behera
Taila
0.072
17
Dhaurakhaman
45/45
86
Prafulla Kumar Sethi S/o Bauri
Bandhu Sethi
Taila
0.101
18
Dhaurakhaman
45/41
87
Vinay Kumar Behera S/o Sushant
Kumar Behera and Others
Taila
0.307
19
Dhaurakhaman
45/12
92
Village community land in the
name of President, Brahmanbil.
Taila
0.622
20
Dhaurakhaman
45/12
93
Village community land in the
name of President, Brahmanbil.
Taila
0.065
21
Dhaurakhaman
2
94
Antaryami Sahu S/o Dhani Sahu
Taila
0.079
22
Dhaurakhaman
20
98
Punia Sahu D/o Damburu Sahu
Taila
0.136
23
Dhaurakhaman
22
99
Bauribandhu Dehuri s/o Panu
Dehuri
Taila
0.101
24
Dhaurakhaman
20
103
Punia Sahu D/o Damburu Sahu
Taila
0.170
25
Dhaurakhaman
45/17
104
Manas Ranjan Swain S/o Prahlad
Swain
Taila
0.245
26
Dhaurakhaman
45/50
105
Vishnu Behera S/o Deenbandhu
Behera
Taila
0.039
27
Dhaurakhaman
14
224
Jay Krishna Pradhan S/o Daitari
Pradhan
Sarada
Jalasachita
Ek Fasali
0.153
28
Dhaurakhaman
45/2
563
Bhagirati Sahoo S/o Nepala
Sahoo and Others
Taila
0.037
29
Dhaurakhaman
45/3
566
Pranati Barik W/o Narayana Barik
Taila
0.096
30
Dhaurakhaman
45/4
567
Pravati Barik W/o Akhya Kumar
Barik
Taila
0.036
31
Dhaurakhaman
45/8
571
Pravat Kiran Barik S/o Anukul
Barik
Taila
0.036
32
Dhaurakhaman
45/11
574
Panchali Barik W/o Pravat Kiran
Barik
Taila
0.026
33
Dhaurakhaman
45/12
575
Village community land in the
name of President, Brahmanbil.
Taila
0.347
34
Dhaurakhaman
45/12
578
Village community land in the
name of President, Brahmanbil.
Taila
0.521
35
Dhaurakhaman
45/12
579
Village community land in the
name of President, Brahmanbil.
Taila
0.129
36
Dhaurakhaman
45/13
580
Binodini Rauta W/o Vishnaba
Rauta
Taila
0.151
37
Dhaurakhaman
45/14
581
Basant Kumar Sahu S/o
Bidyadhar Sahu
Taila
0.049
38
Dhaurakhaman
45/15
582
Tikili Behera W/o Dambaru
Behera
Taila
0.142
39
Dhaurakhaman
45/17
584
Manas Ranjan Swain S/o Prahlad
Swain
Taila
0.343
40
Dhaurakhaman
45/19
587
Baisnaba Rout S/o Purna Chandra
Rout
Taila
0.120
41
Dhaurakhaman
45/21
588
Village community land in the
name of President, Brahmanbil.
Taila
0.595
42
Dhaurakhaman
45/23
589
Srimant Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Taila
0.102
43
Dhaurakhaman
45/23
590
Srimant Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Taila
0.194
44
Dhaurakhaman
45/23
591
Srimant Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Charan Sahu
Taila
0.101
45
Dhaurakhaman
45/23
592
Srimant Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu
Taila
0.194
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2677
(5) Village – Dhaurakhaman
Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl.
No.
R.I Circle/
village
Khata
No.
Plot
No.
Name of the Tenant
Kissam
Area Required
for Project in
hectare
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Charan Sahu
46
Dhaurakhaman
45/29
598
Dipendu Kumar Pradhan S/o
Jadumani Pradhan
Taila
0.114
47
Dhaurakhaman
45/31
600
Dhirendra Kumar Sahu S/o Bhask
Sahu and Others
Taila
0.440
48
Dhaurakhaman
45/49
612
Diptirani Barik W/o Barun Kumar
Barik
Taila
0.024
Total:
Village - Dhaurakhaman
12.099
Boundary Description:
The Naini Coal Block Boundary starts from Point No.1 which is located by the side of State Highway No. 63 and on the
south bank of Gauduni Nala. Whence the boundary moves forward in South-East direction along the State Highway
No.63 (towards Angul Town) up to point No.29. From point No.29 to Point No.136 the boundary takes left turn
towards North-East direction, moving across the CHHENDIPADA RF and to reach point No.136, located on the R F
boundary. From Point No.136 to Point No.A the boundary moved further North-East direction across the village
TENTULOI GOPINATHAPUR passing through Survey No.195, 194, 193, 201, 200. From Point No.A to Point No. C
the boundary moved further North-East direction across the village KASIDIHA passing through Survey No.36, 34, 33,
3092, 32, 30, 24, 23, 20, 17. From Point No.C to Point No.E the boundary moved further North-East direction across the
village THALIPASI passing through Survey No.20, 19, 18, 66, 68, 64, 63, 52, 119, 120, 229, 233, 234, 237, 238, 241,
242, 245, 247, 250, 437, 436, 432, 433, 434, 449, 471, 472, 476, 561, 551, 552, 553, 550, 548, 547, 546. From Point
No.E to Point No.I the boundary moved further North-East direction across the village KUDAPASI passing through
Survey. No. 678, 679, 680, 681, 682, 685, 686, 687, 689, 692, 691, 635, 634, 633, 632, 631, 737, 741, 769, 809, 807,
802, 803, 797, 796, 795, 784, 955, 956, 531, 530, 529, 527, 523, 499, 500, 492, 467, 1224, 462, 461. From Point No.I to
Point No.30 the boundary moved further North-East direction across the village DHAURAKHAMAN passing through
Survey No. 222, 223, 224, 226, 225, 213, 226, 257, 256, 255, 260, 268, 269. From Point No.30 to Point No.31 the
boundary takes left turn towards North-West direction across the village DHAURAKHAMAN passing through Survey.
No. 269, 268, 270, 266, 265, 262, 181, 180, 178, 179, 176, 105, 566, 567, 102, 85, 84, 54, 53, 21, 20 and touching the
CHHENDIPADA RF boundary at Point No.31. From Point No.31 to Point No.35 the boundary further moved in North-
West direction across the CHHENDIPADA RF to meet the Point No.35 located on the RF boundary. From Point No.35
to point No.1 the Boundary takes left turn towards South-West direction along the south bank of Gauduni Nala towards
upstream and closed at Point No.1 whence the boundary started.
(1) Village: TENTULOI GOPINATHAPUR : Boundary bounded by Point No.136, A and B.
The village boundary line starts from Point No.136, which is situated close to the tri-junction point, touching the
CHHENDIPADA RF boundary and block boundary at Survey No.195. From Point No.136 to Point No. A, the block
boundary moved towards North-East direction across the village TENTULOI GOPINATHAPUR passing through
Survey No.195, 194, 193, 201, 200 touching the village boundary at North-East end at Survey No.200. From Point No.A
to Point No.B the village boundary moved in North-East direction covering the Survey No.200, 199, 195 and touching
the Chhendipada RF boundary at Point No.B. From Point No.B to Point No.136 it is common boundary between
TENTULOI GOPINATHAPUR village and CHHENDIPADA RF.
(2) Village: KASIDIHA: Boundary bounded by Point No. A, C, D, and B.
The village boundary line starts from Point No. A, which is situated at common point for Survey No.36 and Survey
No.34. From Point No.A to Point No.C, the block boundary moved towards North-East direction across the village
KASIDIHA passing through Survey No. 36, 34, 33, 3092, 32, 30, 24, 23, 20, 17 touching the village boundary at North-
East end at Survey No.17. From point No.C to Point No.D the village boundary moved in North-West direction
covering the Survey No. 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 3176, 5 and passing through tri-junction point, and
moved along Survey No. 2, 1, touching the CHHENDIPADA RF boundary at Point. No.D. From point No.D to Point
No.B it is a common boundary between KASIDIHA village and CHHENDIPADA RF. The village boundary from Point
No.B to Point No.A moves in South-West direction covering the Survey No.1, 30, 31, 32, 36 and closing the boundary
at Point No.A.
(3) Village: THALIPASI : Boundary bounded by Point No. C, E, F, G and D.
The village boundary line starts from Point No. C, which is situated at Survey No.20. From Point No.C to Point No.E,
the block boundary moved towards North-East direction across the village THALIPASI passing through Survey No.20,
19, 18, 66, 68, 64, 63, 52, 119, 120, 229, 233, 234, 237, 238, 241, 242, 245, 247, 250, 437, 436, 432, 433, 434, 449, 471,
472, 476, 561, 551, 552, 553, 550, 548, 547 and 546 touching the village boundary at North-East end at Survey No.546.
From point No.E to Point No.F the village boundary moved in North-West direction covering the Survey No.546, 545,
542, 541, 538, 537, 536, 533, 532, 531, 530, 528, 527, 526, 525, 524, 523. From point No.F to Point No.G the village
boundary moved in West direction covering Survey No.510, 509, 498, 414, 413, 412, 411, 410, 409, 408, 407, 406, 403,
2678
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
402, 401, 119, 96, 93, 89, 86, 85, and 1 touching the CHHENDIPADA RF boundary at Point. No.G. From Point No.G
to Point No.D it is common boundary between THALIPASI village and CHHENDIPADA RF. From Point No.D to
Point No.C the village boundary moved in South-East direction covering the Survey No.1, 2, 3, 578, 577, 11, 15, 16, 17,
18, 20 and closing the boundary at Point No. C.
(4) Village: BIMBADHARAPUR : Boundary bounded by Point No.G, F and H.
The village boundary line starts from Point No.G which is close to tri-junction point and touching the
CHHENDIPADA RF BOUNDARY. From Point No.G to Point No.F the village boundary moved in East direction
covering the Survey No. 1, 162, 163, 164, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 367,
368, 369, 370, 372, 373, 378, 379. From Point No.F to Point No.H the village boundary moved in North-West direction
covering the Survey No.387, 379, 378, 377, 376, 375, 364, tri-junction point, 363, 362, 353, 415, 412, 352, 47, 44, 34,
392, 399, 33, 389, 430, 32, 19, 17, 4 and touching the CHHENDIPADA RF boundary at Point No.H. From Point No.H
to Point No.G it is common boundary between BIMBADHARAPUR village and CHHENDIPADA RF closing the
boundary at Point No.G.
(5) Village: KUDAPASI : Boundary bounded by Point No. E, I, J, H and F.
The village boundary line starts from Point No.E, which is situated close to the tri-junction point at Survey No.678.
From Point No.E to Point No.I the block boundary moved towards North-East direction across the village KUDAPASI
passing through Survey No.678, 679, 680, 681, 682, 685, 686, 687, 689, 692, 691, 635, 634, 633, 632, 631, 737, 741,
769, 809, 807, 802, 803, 797, 796, 795, 784, 955, 956, 531, 530, 529, 527, 523, 499, 500, 492, 467, 1224, 462, 461.
From Point No.I to Point No.J the village boundary moved in North-West direction covering the Survey No.461, tri-
junction point, 393, 392, 391, 390, 389, 388, 1318, 380, 379, 365, 364, tri-junction point, 47, 46, 44, 1230, 1229, 1228,
27 and touching the CHHENDIPADA RF boundary at Point No.J. From Point No.J to Point No.H it is common
boundary between KUDAPASI village and CHHENDIPADA RF. From Point No.H to Point No.F and Point No.E. the
village boundary moved in South-East direction covering the Survey No.1, 1316, 1234, 1235, 1353, 1236, 1237, 1, 2,
112, 113, 127, 134, 1351, tri-junction point, 1351, 1307, 138, 1322, 139, 1223, 184, 185, tri-junction point, 186, 188,
202, 1309, 204, 673, 676, 677, 678 and closing the boundary at Point No.E.
(6) Village: DHAURAKHAMAN: Boundary bounded by Point No. I, 30, 31 and J.
The village boundary line starts from Point No.I, which is situated at Survey No.222. From Point No.I to Point No.30
the block boundary moved towards North-East direction across the village DHAURAKHAMAN passing through
Survey No. 222, 223, 224, 226, 225, 213, 226, 257, 256, 255, 260, 268, 269. From Point No.30 to Point No.31 the block
boundary moved in North-West direction covering the Survey No. 269, 268, 270, 266, 265, 262, 181, 180, 178, 179,
176, 105, 566, 567, 102, 85, 84, 54, 53, 21, 20 and touching the CHHENDIPADA RF boundary at Point No.31. From
Point No.31 to Point No.J it is common boundary between DHAURAKHAMAN village and CHHENDIPADA RF.
From Point No.J to Point No.I the village boundary moved in South-East direction covering the Survey No.1, 2, 4, 558,
551, 7, 553, 552, 553, 34, 35, 36, 37, tri-junction point, 90, 91, 92, 95, 200, tri-junction point, 201, 202, 203, 219, 220,
221, tri-junction point, 222, and closing the boundary at Point No.I.
[F. No. 43015/18/2015- LA & IR]
RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Dy. Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 2 ebZ] 2019
dk
dk
dk
dk-vk
vkvk
vk- 656
656
656
656-&dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ;g izrhr gksrk gS fd] blls mikc) vuqlwph esa mfYyf[kr ifj{ks= dh
Hkwfe esa dks;yk vfHkizkIr fd, tkus dh laHkkouk gS;
vkSj] js[kkad la[;k ,lbZLkh,y@ch,lih@th,e¼ih,yth½@Hkwfe@527] rkjh[k 19 ekpZ] 2019 dk ftlesa
mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe {ks= ds C;kSjs vUrfoZ"V gS] fujh{k.k dysDVj] ftyk lqjtiqj ¼NRrhlx<+½ ds dk;kZy; esa
;k dks;yk fu;a=d] 1] dkmafly gkÅl LVªhV] dksydkrk & 700001 ds dk;kZy; esa ;k lkÅFk bZLVuZ dksyQhYM~l
fyfeVsM ¼jktLo vuqHkkx½] lhir jksM] fcykliqj&495006 ¼NÙrhlx<+½ ds dk;kZy; esa fd;k tk ldrk gSA
vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] dks;yk /kkjd {ks= ¼vtZu vkSj fodkl½ vf/kfu;e] 1957 ¼1957 dk 20½ ¼ftls
blesa blds i’pkr~ mDr vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gS½ dh /kkjk 4 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznRr ’kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs
gq,] iwoksZDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa dks;ys dk iwosZ{k.k djus ds vius vk’k; dh lwpuk nsrh gSA
mijksDr mfYyf[kr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrcn~/k dksbZ O;fDr &
¼i½
laiw.kZ Hkwfe ;k mlds fdlh Hkkx ;k ,slh Hkwfe esa ;k mlds Åij fdlh vf/kdkj ds vtZu ij vk{ksi dj
ldsxk( vFkok
¼ii½
mDr vf/klwpuk dh /kkjk 4 dh mi&/kkjk ¼3½ ds v/khu dh xbZ fdlh dk;ZokbZ ls gqbZ ;k lEHkor% gksus
okyh fdlh {kfr ds fy;s vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 ds v/khu izfrdj dk nkok dj ldsxk( vFkok
¼iii½
mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 13 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu iwosZ{k.k vuqKfIr;ksa ds izHkkoghu gksus ds laca/k esa ;k
mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 13 dh mi&/kkjk ¼4½ ds v/khu [kuu iV~Vs izHkkoghu gksus ds fy;s izfrdj dk
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2679
nkok dj ldsxk vkSj mls mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 13 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds [kaM ¼i½ ls ¼iv½ esa fofufnZ"V
enksa dh Ckkcr mixr O;; dks minf’kZr djus ds fy;s iwoksZDr Hkwfe ls lacaf/kr lHkh ekufp=ksa] pkVksZ vkSj
vU; nLrkostksa dks ifjnRr dj ldsxk]
jkti= esa bl vf/klwpuk ds izdk’ku dh rkjh[k ls uCcs fnu dh vof/k ds Hkhrj Hkkjlk/kd vf/kdkjh ;k foHkkxk/;{k
¼jktLo½] lkÅFk bZLVuZ dksyQhYM~l fyfeVsM] lhir jksM] fcykliqj&495006 ¼NRrhlx<+½ dks lqiqnZ djsxk A
vuqlwph
vuqlwph
vuqlwph
vuqlwph
egkek;k vkslhih foLrkj Cykd] HkVxkao {ks=]
egkek;k vkslhih foLrkj Cykd] HkVxkao {ks=]
egkek;k vkslhih foLrkj Cykd] HkVxkao {ks=]
egkek;k vkslhih foLrkj Cykd] HkVxkao {ks=]
ftyk& lqjtiqj ¼NRrhlx<+½
ftyk& lqjtiqj ¼NRrhlx<+½
ftyk& lqjtiqj ¼NRrhlx<+½
ftyk& lqjtiqj ¼NRrhlx<+½
[js[kkad la[;k ,lbZlh,y@ch,lih@th,e¼ih,yth½@Hkwfe@527] rkjh[k 19 ekpZ] 2019]
jktLo Hkfe%
Øe
la-
xzke dk uke
xzke la[;k
rglhy
ftyk
{ks=
gsDVj esa
fVIif.k;k
1-
tjgh
103
izrkiiqj
lqjtiqj
16.410
Hkkx
dqy % 16-410 gsDVj ¼yxHkx½ ;k 40-55 ,dM+ ¼yxHkx½
fVIi.k
fVIi.k
fVIi.k
fVIi.k % xzke tjgh ¼Hkkx½ esa vftZr fd;s tkus okys IykV la[;k% 33(Hkkx), 37@2] 38@1] 38@2] 39 ls 47] 53
ls 58] 61(Hkkx), 62(Hkkx), 66(Hkkx), 67 ls 75] 341(Hkkx), 342(Hkkx), 483(Hkkx) ls 485(Hkkx), 486@1]
486@2] 487] 488(Hkkx), 489(Hkkx), 490] 491(Hkkx), 492@1 ls 492@4] 493@1]493@2] 494 ls 497]
498(Hkkx), 500(Hkkx), 501] 507(Hkkx), 553@1(Hkkx), 553@2] 555(Hkkx), 556(Hkkx), 557] 564@1 ls
564@3] 566(Hkkx), 582(Hkkx), 583(Hkkx), 585(Hkkx), 589(Hkkx), 590(Hkkx), 591 ls 595] 596(Hkkx),
597(Hkkx), 618(Hkkx) ls 620(Hkkx), 621 ls 623] 624(Hkkx), 625(Hkkx), 637(Hkkx), 638(Hkkx),
741(Hkkx), 748(Hkkx), 749] 750(Hkkx), 751(Hkkx), 752 ls 755] 756(Hkkx), 757(Hkkx), 760(Hkkx),
772(Hkkx).
lhek o.kZu%
lhek o.kZu%
lhek o.kZu%
lhek o.kZu%
Cykd & d%
Cykd & d%
Cykd & d%
Cykd & d%
d&[k js[kk fcUnq *d* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh ds if'peh Hkkx ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq *[k* ij feyrh gSA
[k&x js[kk fcUnq *[k* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas iwohZ fn'kk ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq *x* ij feyrh gSA
x&?k js[kk fcUnq *x* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas nf{k.kh fn'kk ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq *?k* ij feyrh gSA
?k&d js[kk fcUnq *?k* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas if'peh fn'kk ls gksrh gqbZ vkjafHkd fcUnq *d* ij
feyrh gSA
Cykd & [k%
Cykd & [k%
Cykd & [k%
Cykd & [k%
³&p js[kk fcUnq *³* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas mRrjh fn'kk ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq *p* ij feyrh gSA
p&N js[kk fcUnq *p* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas iwohZ fn'kk ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq *N* ij feyrh gSA
N&t js[kk fcUnq *N* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas nf{k.kh fn'kk ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq *t* ij feyrh gSA
t&³ js[kk fcUnq *t* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas if'peh fn'kk ls gksrh gqbZ vkjafHkd fcUnq *³* ij
feyrh gSA
[Qk- la- 43015@06@2019&,y, ,.M vkbZvkj]
jke f’kjksef.k ljkst] mi lfpo
New Delhi, the 2nd May, 2019
S.O. 656.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that coal is likely to be obtained from the lands in
the locality mentioned in the Schedule annexed hereto;
And whereas, the plan bearing number SECL/BSP/GM(PLG)/LAND/527, dated the 19th March, 2019
containing details of the area of land described in the said Schedule may be inspected at the office of the Collector,
District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh) or at the office of the Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata-700001 or at
the office of the South Eastern Coalfields Limited (Revenue Section), Seepat Road, Bilaspur -495006 (Chhattisgarh).
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas
(Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the Central Government
hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal in the land described in the aforesaid Schedule.
Any person interested in the land described in the above mentioned Schedule may-
(i)
object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or of any rights in or over such land; or
2680
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(ii)
claim compensation under section 6 of the said Act for any damage caused or likely to be caused by any
action taken under sub -section (3) of section 4 of the said Act; or
(iii)
claim compensation under sub-section (1) of section 13 of the said Act, in respect of prospecting license
ceasing to have effect or under sub-section (4) of section 13 of the said Act for mining lease ceasing to have
effect and deliver all maps, charts and other documents relating to the aforesaid land to show the
expenditure incurred in respect of items specified in clauses (i) to (iv) of sub-section (1) of section 13 of
the said Act,
to the Officer-In-Charge or Head of the Department (Revenue), South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Seepat Road,
Bilaspur -495006 (Chhattisgarh) within a period of ninety days from the date of publication of this notification in the
Official Gazette.
SCHEDULE
Mahamaya OCP Extension Block, Bhatgaon Area,
District- Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)
[Plan bearing number SECL/BSP/GM (PLG)/LAND/ 527, dated the 19th March, 2019]
Revenue Land:
Sl.
No.
Name of
village
Village
number
Tahsil
District
Area
in
hectares
Remarks
1.
Jarhi
103
Pratappur
Surajpur
16.410
Part
Total: 16.410 hectares (approximately) or 40.55 acres (approximately)
Note : Plot numbers to be acquired in village Jarhi (Part): 33(P), 37/2, 38/1, 38/2, 39 to 47, 53 to 58, 61(P), 62(P),
66(P), 67 to 75, 341(P), 342(P), 483(P) to 485(P), 486/1, 486/2, 487, 488(P), 489(P), 490, 491(P), 492/1 to
492/4, 493/1, 493/2, 494 to 497,
498(P), 500(P), 501, 507(P), 553/1(P), 553/2, 555(P), 556(P), 557, 564/1
to 564/3, 566(P), 582(P), 583(P), 585(P), 589(P), 590(P), 591 to 595, 596(P), 597(P), 618(P) to 620(P), 621 to
623, 624(P), 625(P), 637(P), 638(P), 741(P), 748(P), 749, 750(P), 751(P), 752 to 755, 756(P), 757(P), 760(P),
772(P).
Boundary description:
Block – A :
A-B
Line starts from point ‘A’ and passes in village Jarhi through western part of village Jarhi and meets at point
‘B’.
B-C
Line starts from point ‘B’ and passes in village Jarhi towards eastern direction of village Jarhi, and meets at
point ‘C’.
C-D
Line starts from point ‘C’ and passes in village Jarhi towards southern direction of village Jarhi and meets at
point ‘D’.
D-A
Line starts from point ‘D’ and passes in village Jarhi towards western direction of village Jarhi and meets at
starting point ‘A’.
Block – B:
E-F
Line starts from point ‘E’ and passes in village Jarhi towards northern direction of village Jarhi, and meets at
point ‘F’.
F-G
Line starts from point ‘F’ and passes in village Jarhi towards eastern direction of village Jarhi and meets at
point ‘G’.
G-H
Line starts from point ‘G’ and passes in village Jarhi towards southern direction of village Jarhi and meets at
point ‘H’.
H-E
Line starts from point ‘H’ and passes in village Jarhi towards western direction of village Jarhi and meets at
starting point ‘E’.
[F. No. 43015/ 06 /2019-LA&IR ]
RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Dy. Secy.
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2681
Je vkSj jkstxkj ea=ky;
ubZ fnYyh] 24 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 657-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14 ½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj iwoZ
mRrj jsyos izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k dkuiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 64@2017½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 24-04-2019 dks
izkIr gq, FksA
[la- ,y&41012@84@2016&vkbZvkj ¼ch&I½]
ch- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
New Delhi, the 24th April, 2019
S.O. 657.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 64/2017) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Kanpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of East North Railway and their
workmen, received by the Central Government on 24-4-2019.
[No. L-41012/84/2016-IR(B-1)]
B.S. BISHT, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI RAKESH KUMAR, HJS, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL–CUM-LABOR COURT, KANPUR.
ID. No. 64 of 2017
Zonal Working President,
Rail Sewak Sangh,
Through Sri D.P. Awasthi,
49, Tilak Nagar, Lucknow.
Versus
The Divisional Personnel Officer,
East North Railway,
DRM Office,
Ashok Marg,
Lucknow.
AWARD
1. Central Government, MOL, New Delhi vide notification No. L-41012/84/2016-IR (B-I) dated 10.08.2017 has
referred the following for Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
“KYA PURVOTTAR RAIL PRASHASHAN LUCKNOW DWARA SRI RAKESH KUMAR,
HELPER KHALASI KO USKI JOINING TITHI ( 25.08.98)SE SC/ST QUOTA KE TAHAT
MILNE WALI PADONNATI NA DEKAR USSE JUNIOR KO PADONNATI DIYA JANA
TATHA NYAYOCHIT AVAM VAID HAI? YADI NAHI TO KAMGAR KIS RAHAT KO
PANE KA HAQDAR HAI?”
2. After receipt of reference order from Ministry of Labor and Employment, New Delhi registered notices dated
11.09.2017 were issued from this Tribunal to the parties for filing their respective claim and counter claim
fixing 20.10.2017. But since Presiding Officer was on tour on 20.10.17, the case was adjourned to 19.01.18,
still no claim petition was filed in the case on 19.01.2018. Again on 22.01.19, the case was taken up for
hearing but when none appeared from the side of the contesting parties it was ordered that registered notices
be issued to the contesting parties for filing of their claim and counter claim petition in the case on behalf of
the worker, but both the parties were absent and no claim petition was filed in the instant case by the Union
raising the dispute on behalf of the worker. The case was again listed for hearing on 03.04.2018, 01.05.2018,
25.07.18, 28.09.2018, 20.11.2018, 18.01.19, but surprisingly enough to note that despite giving repeated and
reasonable opportunities to the Union for filing claim petition on behalf of the worker, neither any one
appeared on behalf of the union/worker nor any claim petition was filed in the case.
3. Therefore, from the above facts and circumstances of the case, it is absolutely evident that neither the union
raising the present dispute nor the workman is interested in prosecuting the present case. In the instant case
2682
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
union/workers have been given sufficient opportunities to present their claim petition, but after availing of
the adequate opportunities, workers / union have deliberately and willingly failed in discharging their legal
obligation in filing claim petition on their behalf before the Tribunal.
4. Hence, it is abundantly clear that it is a case wherein neither pleadings have been filed by the contesting
parties nor have any documentary evidence been filed on their behalf.
5. As such it is case of no pleading and no evidence; therefore, under these circumstances it is held that the
union /workers are not entitled for any relief for want of pleadings and proof.
6. Reference is answered as above.
dated 08.04.2019
RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 24 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 658-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14 ½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Js;l
xzkeh.k cSad izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k dkuiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 41/2013, 109/2013, 79/2013, 97/2013, 86/2013, 83/2013, 42/2013,
101/2103, 43/2103, 90/2013, 85/2013, 87/2103, 47/2013, 84/2103, 138/2103, 139/2013, 81/2013, 96/2013, 83/2014,
100/2014, 99/2013, 98/2103, 88/2013, 95/2013, 82/2103, 111/2014, 89/2103/2019) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh;
ljdkj dks 24-04-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
[la- ,y&12012/13, 27, 38, 56, 39, 15, 60, 28, 57, 40, 24, 42, 26, 97,
95, 37, 48, 38, 54, 55, 29, 58, 41, 25, 23/2013&vkbZvkj ¼ch&I½]
ch- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 24th April, 2019
S.O. 658.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 41/2013, 109/2013, 79/2013, 97/2013, 86/2013, 83/2013, 42/2013,
101/2013, 43/2013, 90/2013, 85/2013, 87/2013, 47/2013, 84/2013, 138/2013, 139/2013, 81/2013, 96/2013, 83/2014,
100/2014, 99/2013, 98/2013, 88/2013, 95/2013, 82/2013, 111/2014, 89/2013) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court Kanpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Shryas
Gramin Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 24-04-2019.
[No. L-12012/13, 27, 38, 56, 39, 36, 15, 60, 28, 57, 40, 24, 42, 26,
97, 95, 37, 48, 38, 54, 59, 55, 29, 58, 41, 25, 23/2013-IR(B-1)]
B.S. BISHT, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SRI RAKESH KUMAR, HJS, PRESIDING OFFICER
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOR COURT, KANPUR.
1. Industrial Dispute No. 41 of 2013
Between
Sri Jagdish Singh,
S/o Sri Rajendra Pal Singh,
C/o Sri R. P. Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman,
Shreyas Gramin Bank,
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2683
Head Office Digg iRoad,
Aligarh 202001.
AWARD
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/13/2013-IR(B-1) dated 28.05.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shryas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Jagdish
Singh son of Sri Rajendra Pal Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to
what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”
2. Industrial Dispute No. 109 of 2013
Between
Sri Udaiveer Singh,
S/o Sri Babu Lal,
C/o Sri R. P. Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman,
Shreyas Gramin Bank,
Head Office Diggi Road,
Aligarh 202001.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/27/2013-IR(B-1) dated 28.05.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shryas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Udaiveer
Singh son of Sri Babu Lal workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief
the workman concerned is entitled to?”
3. Industrial Dispute No. 79 of 2013
Between
Sri Darshan Singh,
S/o Sri Chunni Lal,
C/o Sri R. P. Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman,
Shreyas Gramin Bank,
Head Office Diggi Road,
Aligarh 202001.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/38/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Darshan
Singh son of Sri Chunni Lal workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief
the workman concerned is entitled to?”
2684
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
4. Industrial Dispute No. 97 of 2013
Between
Sri Sandeep Kumar,
S/o Sri Mohan Lal,
C/o Sri R. P. Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman,
Gramin Bank of Aryavart.
Head Office A-2/46, Vijai Khand,
Gomti Nagar,
Lucknow 226010
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/56/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
”Whether the action of the management of erstwhile Shreyas Gramin Bank, now Gramin Bank of Aryawart
in terminating the services of Sri Sandeep Kumar son of Sri Mohan Lal workman with effect from
01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”
5. Industrial Dispute No. 86 of 2013
Between
Sri Jagveer Singh,
S/o Sri Pokhpal Singh,
C/o Sri R. P. Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman,
Shreyas Gramin Bank,
Head Office Diggi Road,
Aligarh 202001.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/39/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Jagveer
Singh son of Sri Pokhpal workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the
workman concerned is entitled to?”
6. Industrial Dispute No. 83 of 2013
Between
Sri Pankaj Kumar Jain,
S/o Sri Puttu Lal Jain,
C/o Sri R. P. Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2685
And
The Chairman,
Shreyas Gramin Bank,
Head Office Diggi Road,
Aligarh 202001.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/36/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Pankaj
Kumar Jain son of Sri Rajendra Pal Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not
to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”
7. Industrial Dispute No. 42 of 2013
Between
Sri Rakesh Kumar
S/o Sri Roshan Lal,
C/o Sri R. P. Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman,
Shreyas Gramin Bank,
Head Office Diggi Road,
Aligarh 202001.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/15/2013-IR(B-1) dated 28.05.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Rakesh
Kumar son of Sri Roshan Lal workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief
the workman concerned is entitled to?”
8. Industrial Dispute No. 101 of 2013
Between
Sri Arvind Kumar,
S/o Sri Prabhu Dayal Saxena,
C/o Sri R. P. Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman,
Gramin Bank of Aryavart.
Head Office A-2/46, Vijai Khand,
Gomti Nagar,
Lucknow 226010
2686
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/60/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryawart in
terminating the services of Sri Arvind Kumar son of Sri Prabhu Dayal Saxena workman with effect from
01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”
9. Industrial Dispute No. 43 of 2013
Between
Sri Pushpendra Kumar
s/o Sri Ramesh Chandra,
C/o Sri R. P. Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman,
Gramin Bank of Aryavart.
Head Office A-2/46, Vijai Khand,
Gomti Nagar,
Lucknow 226010
the services of Sri Pushpendra Kumar son of Sri Ramesh Chandra workman with
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/28/2013-IR(B-1) dated 17.05.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri
Pushpendra Kumar son of Sri Ramesh Chandra workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal?
If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”
10. Industrial Dispute No. 90 of 2013
Between
Sri Pradeep Kumar Jain,
s/o Sri Prem Chand Jain,
C/o Sri R. P. Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman,
Gramin Bank of Aryavart.
Head Office A-2/46, Vijai Khand,
Gomti Nagar,
Lucknow 226010
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/57/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryawart in
terminating the services of Sri Pradep Kumar Jain son of Sri Prem Chand Jain workman with effect from
01.01.2010 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2687
11. Industrial Dispute No. 85 of 2013
Between
Sri Amar Babu,
s/o Sri Chunni Lal
C/o Sri R. P. Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman,
Shreyas Gramin Bank,
Head Office Diggi Road,
Aligarh 202001.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/40/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
”Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Amar
Babu son of Sri Chunni Lal workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief
the workman concerned is entitled to?”
12 Industrial Dispute No. 87 of 2013
Between
Sri Roop Kishore,
s/o Shri Krishan,
C/o Sri R. P. Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman,
Shreyas Gramin Bank,
Head Office Diggi Road,
Aligarh 202001.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/24/2013-IR(B-1) dated 04.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shryas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Roop
Kishore son of Shri Krishan workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief
the workman concerned is entitled to?”
13. Industrial Dispute No. 84 of 2013
Between
Sri Satish Kumar,
s/oVijay Pal Singh
C/o Sri R. P. Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
2688
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
And
The Chairman,
Shreyas Gramin Bank,
Head Office Diggi Road,
Aligarh 202001.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/42/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shryas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Satish
Kumar son of Sri Vijay Pal Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what
relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”
14. Industrial Dispute No. 47 of 2013
Between
Sri Omveer Singh,
s/o Late Mahendra Singh,
C/o Sri R. P. Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman,
Shreyas Gramin Bank,
Head Office Diggi Road,
Aligarh 202001.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/26/2013-IR(B-1) dated 20.05.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Omveer
Singh son of late Mahendra Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what
relief the workman concerned is entitled to?’’
15. Industrial Dispute No. 138 of 2013
Between
Sri Ram Prakash,
s/o Sri Ram Das,
C/o Sri R. P. Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman,
Shreyas Gramin Bank,
Head Office Diggi Road,
Aligarh 202001.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/97/2013-IR(B-1) dated 08.11.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2689
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shryas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in
terminating the services of Sri Ram Prakash son of Sri Ram Das workman with effect from 01.01.2013 is just
fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”
16. Industrial Dispute No. 139 of 2013
Between
Sri Raghvender Singh,
s/o Sri Jai Pal Singh,
C/o Sri R P Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman,
Gramin Bank of Aryavart,
Head Office
A-2/46 Vijay Khand,
Gomti Nagar,
Lucknow.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/95/2013-IR(B-1) dated 08.11.2013 has
referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
”Whether the action of the management of erstwhile Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in
terminating the services of Sri Raghvendra Singh son of Sri Jai Pal Singh workman with effect from 01.01.2013 is
just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”
17. Industrial Dispute No. 81 of 2013
Between
Sri Manoj Kumar,
s/o Sri Murari Lal,
C/o Sri R P Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman,
Shreyas Gramin Bank,
Head Office Diggi Road,
Aligarh 202001.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification no. L-12012/37/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
”Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Manoj
Kumar son of Sri Murari Lal workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief
the workman concerned is entitled to?”
2690
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
18. Industrial Dispute No. 96 of 2013
Between
Sri Moharman Singh,
s/o Sri Netra Pal Singh C/o Sri R P Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman,
Gramin Bank of Aryavart,
Head Office
A-2/46 Vijay Khand,
Gomti Nagar,
Lucknow.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification no. L-12012/48/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
”Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri
Moharman Singh son of Sri Netrapal Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If
not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”
19. Industrial Dispute No. 83 of 2014
Between
Sri Kuldeep Singh,
s/o Sri Umesh Singh C/o Sri R P Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman,
Gramin Bank of Aryavart,
Head Office
A-2/46 Vijay Khand,
Gomti Nagar,
Lucknow.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification no. L-12012/38/2014-IR(B-1) dated 03.07.2014.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
”Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in
terminating the services of Sri Kuldeep Singh son of Sri Umesh Singh workman with effect from 01.07.2012
is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”
20. Industrial Dispute No. 100 of 2014
Between
Sri Tarsem Kumar,
s/o Sri Balak Ram,
C/o Sri R P Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2691
And
The Chairman,
Gramin Bank of Aryavart,
Head Office
A-2/46 Vijay Khand,
Gomti Nagar,
Lucknow.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/54/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in
terminating the services of Sri Rarsem son of Sri Balak Ram workman with effect from 01.01.2012 is just
fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”
21. Industrial Dispute No. 99 of 2013
Between
Sri Dinesh Kumar
s/o Sri Pramod Kumar, C/o Sri R. P. Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman,
Gramin Bank of Aryavart,
Head Office
A-2/46 Vijay Khand,
Gomti Nagar,
Lucknow.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/59/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in
terminating the services of Sri Dinesh Kumar son of Sri Pramod Kumar workman with effect from
01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”
22. Industrial Dispute No. 98 of 2013
Between
Sri Deepak Kumar,
s/o Sri Brahman Singh, C/o Sri R. P. Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman,
Gramin Bank of Aryavart,
Head Office
A-2/46 Vijay Khand,
Gomti Nagar,
Lucknow.
2692
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/55/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
”Whether the action of the management of erstwhile Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart
in terminating the services of Sri Kuldeep Singh son of Sri Umesh Singh workman with effect from
01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”
23. Industrial Dispute No. 88 of 2013
Between
Sri Manoj Kumar,
s/o Sri Jaidev Singh, C/o Sri R. P. Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman,
Shreyas Gramin Bank,
Head Office,
Diggi Road,
Aligarh.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/29/2013-IR(B-1) dated 04.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in
terminating the services of Sri Manoj Kumar son of Sri Jaidev Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is
just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”
24. Industrial Dispute No. 95 of 2013
Between
Sri Narendra Pal Singh,
s/o Sri Vijay Pal Singh C/o Sri R. P. Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman,
Gramin Bank of Aryavart,
Head Office
A-2/46 Vijay Khand,
Gomti Nagar,
Lucknow.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/58/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in
terminating the services of Sri Narendra Pal Singh son of Sri Vijay Pal Singh workman with effect from
01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2693
25. Industrial Dispute No. 82 of 2013
Between
Sri Hariom Tatsath,
S/o Sri Mahaver Singh, C/o Sri R. P. Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman,
Shreyas Gramin Bank,
Head Office
Diggi Road,
Aligarh.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/41/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Hariom
Tatsath son of Sri Mahaveer Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what
relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”
26. Industrial Dispute No. 111 of 2014
Between
Sri Ram Naresh,
S/o Sri Ram Charan, C/o Sri R. P. Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman,
Shreyas Gramin Bank,
Head Office,
Diggi Road,
Aligarh.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/25/2013-IR(B-1) dated 31.05.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Ram
Naresh son of Sri Ram Charan workman with effect from 01.07.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what
relief the workman concerned is entitled to?
27. Industrial Dispute No. 89 of 2013
Between
Sri Virendra Kumar Jain, S/o
Sh. Raj Kumar Jain C/o Sri R. P. Singh,
State Executive Committee Member,
U.P. Bank Workers Organization,
3/13 Mathura Nagar,
Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
2694
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
And
The Chairman,
Gramin Bank of Aryavart,
Head Office
A-2/46 Vijay Khand,
Gomti Nagar,
Lucknow.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/23/2013-IR(B-1) dated 04.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
‘‘Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Virendra
Kumar Jain son of Sri Raj Kumar Jain workman with effect from 01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to
what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”
28. As in all the above cases common question of facts and law is involved, therefore, all the cases were
consolidated by order of the tribunal passed on 05.05.15 and Industrial Dispute No. 41 of 13 was made the
leading case. Therefore the tribunal proposes to decide all the above cases by means of this common award.
29. The case number, name of worker, date of appointment, date of termination of service and the branch where
they were posted are shown in the following chart which is as per facts mentioned by the concerned
workmen in their claim petition:-
SL.
No.
ID No.
Name of worker
Date
of
appointment
Date
of
termination
Branch where was posted
1
41/2013
JAGDISH SINGH
01-06-2007
01-08-2012
SAKRAULI, DIST-ETAH
2
86/2013
JAGVEER SINGH
OCT 1999
01-08-2012
ALIGANJ, DISTT- ETAH
3
97/2013
SANDEEP KUMAR
01/01/2099
01/01/2013
PATIALI GATE,DISTT-ETAH
4
79/2013
DARSHAN SINGH
JUNE 2005
01-08-2012
JINHORA,
UNDER
ETAH
GRAMNIN BANK
5
109/2013
UDAY
VEER
SINGH
1999
01-08-2012
ETAH
CITY
UNDER
ETAH
GRAMNIN BRANCH
6.
83/2013
PANKAJ KR. JAIN
1998
01-08-2012
ISSUALI
UNDER
ETAH
GRAMIN BANK
7.
42/2013
RAKESH KUMAR
2001
1-8-2012
PIWARI
UNDER
ETAH
GRAMIN BANK
8.
101/2013
ARVIND KUMAR
2001
01-01-2013
JAITHRA
UNDER
ETAH
GRAMIN BANK
9
43/2013
PUSHPENDRA
KUMAR
2006
01-08-2012
PUNHERA
,
ETAH
UNDER
SHREYAS GRAMIN BANK
10
99/2013
DINESH KUMAR
2006
01-01-2013
AMRAULI
RATANPUR(ETAH)
UNDER GRAMIN BANK OF
ARYAVART
11.
83/2014
KULDEEP SINGH
JANUARY 2008
01-07-2012
HATHODA (KASGANJ) UNDER
SHREYAS GRAMIN BANK
12.
89/2013
VIRENDRA
KR.
JAIN
26-03-2010
01-01-2013
JALESER
CITIY
UNDER
SHREYAS GRAMIN BANK
13.
111/2013
RAM NARESH
10-08-1999
01-07-2012
VIRAMPUR,
UNDER
ETAH
GRAMIN BANK
14.
82/2013
HARI OM TAD SAT
1995
01-08-2012
JALESHAR
MAIN
BRANCH
UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK,
ATTAH
15.
95/2013
NARENDRA
PAL
SINGH
1990
01-07-2012
SARAWAL
UNDER
ATTAH
GRAMIN BANK
16.
88/2013
MANOJ KUMAR
1997
01-08-2012
ETAH GRAMIN BANK, ATTAH
17.
98/2013
DEEPAK KUMAR
24-04-2K
1-01-2013
DARIYA
GANJ,
DIST-
KASHGANJ
UNDER
ETAH
GRAMIN BANK
18.
100/2013
TARSEM KUMAR
01-01-1992
01-01-2013
RAJA KA RAM PUR (ETAH
GRAMIN BANK)
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2695
19.
96/2013
MOHAR
MAN
SINGH
NIL
01-08-2012
MALAWAN
UNDER
ETAH
GRAMIN BANK
20.
81/2013
MANOJ KUMAR
1997
01-08-2012
JALESHAR CITY UNDER ETAH
GRAMIN BANK
21
139/2013
RAGHVENDRA
SINGH
JANUARY 2010
01-01-2013
PATIALI
BRANCH
UNDER
SHREYAS GRAMIN BANK
22
138/2013
RAMPRAKASH
APRIL 1986
1-1-2013
SIKAHRA
UNDER
ETAH
GRAMIN BANK
23.
47/2013
OM VEER SINGH
1-4-2001
1-8-2012
NIDHAULI KALAWN UNDER
ETAH GRAMIN BANK
24.
84/2013
SATISH KUMAR
1-1-1993
1-8-2012
AWAGARH,
ETAH
UNDER
ETAH GRAMIN BANK
25.
87/2013
ROOP KISHORE
JULY 2003
01-08-2012
NAGARIA
BRANCH
UNDER
ETAH GRAMIN BANK
26.
85/2013
AMAR BABU
JANUARY 2008
1-8-2012
JIRSAMI(ETAH)
UNDER
SHREYAS GRAMIN BANK
27.
90/2013
PRADEEP KR. JAIN
1992
1-1-2010
SAKRAULI
(ETAH)
UNDER
ETAH GRAMIN BANK
30. In the claim petition filed by each workman it is alleged that on 01.04.2014 Shreyas Gramin Bank and
Aryavart Regional Gamin Bank were amalgamated with each other and Gramin Bank of Aryavart was
constituted of which Head Office is situated at A-2/46, Vijay Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow. It is also
alleged that prior to 01.04.13, in the month of June 2006, Aligarh Gramin Bank, Etah Gramin Bank and
Jamuna Gramin Bank were amalgamated with each other and in its place Shreyas Gramin Bank was
constituted.
31. It is further alleged that the then branch managers of the branches mentioned above, to run effectively the
working of the branch and with permission of senior officers of the bank had appointed the workers as
temporary daily rated employee / messenger (coolie), but no appointment letters were issued to the concerned
workmen by the management. The entire workers under the instructions of the branch managers had worked
for whole month and their work and conduct ever remained satisfactory. It is further alleged by all the
workmen that despite performing work for whole month, they had been paid wages only for 10 days and all
the workmen were being assured by the then branch managers of the respective branches that in case they
continue to work in the branch, their services will be regularized at the post of permanent messenger.
Workers have further stated that believing the assurances given by the employer they continued to work in
the respective branches of the bank. It is further pleaded that all the workers were also used to be paid bonus
according to Rules. One fine morning suddenly by oral order of the then branch managers of respective
branches, the services of all the workers were terminated (as per date mentioned in the chart as above) in
gross violation of the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, by adopting Unfair Labor Practice as also
ignoring their length of service. It is further pleaded by all the workers that from the facts and circumstances
herein above it is established that they were removed from the services of the bank on an arbitrary and
whimsical considerations without following the legal provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
32. Lastly it is prayed by each worker that they be reinstated in the service of the bank at the post of messenger
with full back wages and further all of them be regularized in the service of bank.
33. It is pertinent to mention here that all the workers have also filed a copy of Public Notice dated 01.04.2013,
issued by the Head office of Aryavart Gramin Bank, Luckow, which, inter-alia, provide amalgamation of
Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) sponsored by Bank of India and Canara Bank into a single larger RRB in the
State of Uttar Pradesh. It further provides that by Notification No. F.No.719/2011-RRB(UP-1) dated
01.04.2013, Government of India, in the exercise of powers under sub section (1) of section 23(A) of the
Regional Rural Banks Act 1976 (21) in consultation with National Bank for Agriculture and Rural
Development (NABARD) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Bank of India and Canara Bank being the sponsor’s
bank of 1) Aryavart Kshertiya Garmin Bank and 2) Shreyas Gramin Bank, referred to as Regional Rural
Banks (RRBs) has in public interest and in the interest of development of the area served by the aforesaid
Regional Bank and also in the interest of development of the area served by the aforesaid Regional Rural
Banks and also in the interest of the said Regional Rural Banks themselves notified amalgamation of the two
Regional Rural Banks into a single Regional Rural Bank with effect from the date of publication of the said
Notification in the official Gazette of Government of India.
34. It has further been stated by the Opposite Party that therefore, from the above notification which is a public
document, it is established that the Shreyas Gramin Bank stands eliminated and after amalgamation, in its
2696
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
place Gramin Bank of Aryavart has been legally placed and all the workers would be deemed to have been
appointed by the Gramin Bank of Aryavat, Lucknow at their respective branches.
35. Management has filed a common reply in each case wherein it is admitted by the management that Shreyas
Gramin Bank had been amalgamated with Gramin Bank of Aryavart by notification ref.No. F.No. 7/9/2011
RRB (U.P.1) dated 01.04.2013.
36. Management has further alleged that appointment and promotions in the respondent bank are made as per
Government of India guidelines and prevailing rules in the Bank are also framed by Government of India in
exercise of powers conferred by section 29 read with section 17 of the RRB Act, 1976 and known as (RRB
Appointment and Promotion Rules, 1998).
37. It is further alleged that none of the applicants were ever appointed to any substantive post in the bank by
following the procedure laid down by the Government of India. All the workers were engaged as Coolie in
the Branches of the Bank and Coolie is a person who is engaged by the branch Manager on the emergent
need of work and on day to day basis in case of need of the branch. That none of the workers have worked
for whole month and the coolie charges have been paid to the petitioners on day to day basis, who were
engaged on emergent basis. Coolie Charges have been paid to the workers by charging the amount from
Contingency Charges by the respective branch managers on the basis of actual number of working days. It is
also denied by the bank that it had ever paid any salary or wages to the workers and that the “Coolie
Charges” does not come within the definition of wages.
38. It is also denied by the management that there ever existed the relationship of master and servant between the
Gramin Bank of Aryavat and the workman and that they had never been on the rolls of the bank as they were
not in the service of the bank. It is also pleaded that none of the worker had ever marked his attendance in the
attendance register. None of the worker had ever held any regular and permanent post in the bank. Bank had
never issued any appointment letter to any of the workman involved in the present case. It is also denied by
the management that any of the workman had worked for 240 days of continuous service during the period of
12 calendar months preceding the date of their respective termination of services. All the workmen were
engaged on day to day basis and that such engagement came to an end at the end of the day. The management
had never terminated the services of the workmen as mentioned in the present reference order, therefore, the
present reference on this ground alone, is without jurisdiction, bad in law and not maintainable under the
provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The service conditions of the bank employee do not apply to any
of the workmen. Recruitment in the bank is done as per the set guidelines of the Government and accordingly
candidates are sponsored by the Regional Employment Exchange, thereafter, they are subjected to written
test and interview and only those candidates are appointed by offering them appointment letter in the service
of the bank who have been declared successful. It is also pleaded that all the workmen are trying to enter into
the service of the bank through back door entry by misusing and abusing the powers of this Tribunal. The
persons engaged in emergent need on casual or daily rate basis are not covered by the “Bank Awards and
Settlements”. It is denied by the management that at any point of time it had contravened any of the
provisions of the Act. The selection and appointment against regular and permanent post is the prerogative of
the competent authority of the bank and a person who had never been recruited on regular basis had no right
to assail the action of the appointing authority. The bank had never retrenched or terminated the services of
the workmen at any point of time by oral or written orders, hence no industrial dispute exists between the
contesting parties. It is also pleaded that none of the worker is covered by the definition of Workman as
defined u/s 2(s) of the Act as also the management is not an Employer as defined under section 2(g) of the
Act. That the workmen of the instant case prior to raising of the present dispute had also approached the
Hon’ble High Court Allahabad with same prayer as has been prayed in their respective claim petitions but
their writ petition was dismissed by order dated 01.03.2012, hence the decision of the Hon’ble Court is
binding in the present case also.
39. On merit of the case It is admitted by the bank that the petitioners were engaged for the work of coolie in the
branch of the Bank and Coolie is a person who is engaged by the Branch Manager on the emergent
requirement and on day to day basis in case of any need at the branch. None of the worker was ever
appointed as Daily Rated Messenger (Coolie) in the branch. Since there was no regular vacancy in the
branch, therefore, the question of appointment on the post of Daily Rated Messenger (Coolie) in the bank
does not arise at all. None of the worker had produced formal letter of their appointment in the bank and all
of them are perhaps trying to seek back door entry in the service of the bank. It is also denied by the bank
that at any point of time the bank had adopted any unfair labor practice with regard to the workmen.
40. The management on the basis of above pleadings has prayed that the present claim of the respective workers
is devoid of merit and is therefore, liable to be rejected in lim-ne. It is also prayed that none of the workman
is entitled for the relief claimed by them.
41. Rejoinder statements have also been filed by each of the workmen but therein nothing new has been pleaded
except reiterating of the facts already pleaded in their respective claim petitions.
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2697
42. It is relevant to mention here that by order dated 17.02.16, industrial dispute case nos 138, 139 of 13 and
83/14 were further consolidated with Industrial Dispute No. 41 of 13 which was made the leading case.
43. The management by application dated 02.11.2015 which is paper no. 14/1 has filed photocopy of order dated
20.09.2011 passed in Writ A No.-53798 of 2011 and order dated 01.03.2013 passed in Writ A No. 11728 of
2012 passed by Hon’ble High Court, Allahabad.
44. It is pertinent to mention here that by order dated 27.05.15, this tribunal partly allowed the application for
summoning of documents from the management and the management was directed to produce Vouchers,
Attendance Register, Salary Register, Dispatch Register (Tappal) as these documents are relevant for
deciding the case.
45. In the instant case on behalf of the workmen S/Sri Udaiveer Singh in I.D. No.109 of 2013, has examined
himself as w.w.1, Virendra Kumar Jain in I. D. Case No. 89 of 2013, has examined himself as w.w. 2, Ram
Naresh in I.D. No. 111 of 2013, has examined himself as w.w.3, Pushpendra Kumar in I. D. No. 43 of 2013,
has examined himself as w.w.4 and Sri Hariom Tatsat in I.D. No. 82 of 2013 has examined himself as w.w.5,
and all of them have filed their evidence on affidavit. They have also filed certain photocopies of the
documents like payment vouchers and dispatch registers which have been duly verified by the bank.
46. In his affidavit evidence W.W.1 Sri Udaiveer Singh has stated nothing new except reiterating the statement
made by him in his claim petition. He has filed photocopies of payment vouchers dated 01.08.11, 01.09.11,
01.10.11, 31.10.11, 01.12.11, 18.01.12, 02.02.12, 02.03.12, 31.03.12, 04.05.12, 02.06.12, 07.07.12 and
13.09.12 in support of his claim and all these payment vouchers are marked as paper no. 15/4 to15/17. All
these documents are duly verified by the bank. Beside the witness has also filed photocopies of dispatch
register paper no. 15/19 to 15/68.
47. This witness in his cross examination has categorically admitted that he was engaged by the branch manager
on need basis as Coolie. He admitted that he was used to be paid his wages by the bank from contingency
through voucher. Witness has further admitted the fact that he was never issued any appointment letter from
the bank and he also expressed his ignorance as to whether or not such letter is available on the record of the
case. He has submitted that his attendance was marked and the record showing that he had rendered 240 days
of continuous service is available on the file. He further asserted that he was removed from the service in the
month of June 2012, but he does not remember the exact date on which his services were dispensed with by
the bank.
48. In his affidavit evidence workman W.W.2, Virendra Kumar Jain has deposed that on 26.03.2010, the then
Shreyas Gramin Bank ( now known as Gramin Bank of Aryavart) had opened its new Branch at Firozabad
and at that time no person was appointed on the post of Messenger on permanent basis. The then Branch
Manager after approval of his senior officers had appointed him on the post of Messenger (Coolie). He
performed the duties of messenger with full devotion. Worker has further given details of payment of
monthly salary during the period March 2010 to June 2012, and last payment of salary was at Rs.4275/- in
the month of June 2012. He has further deposed that the bank used to utilize his services outside the branch
and that with effect from 30.06.2012 suddenly he was removed from the service of the bank in an arbitrary
manner without making compliance of the mandatory provisions of the Act. He has further deposed that he is
unemployed.
49. The witness W.W.2 in support of the above assertions has filed photocopy of payment vouchers duly verified
by the Senior Manager, City Branch, Firozabad, Gramin Bank of Aryavart and these payment vouchers are
dated 01.09.11, paper no. 14/6, 29.09.11, paper no. 14/7, 01.11.2011, paper no. 14/8, 01.12.11, paper no.
14/9, 31.12.11, paper no. 14/10, 01.02.12, paper no. 14/11, 29.02.12, paper no.14/12, 31.03.12, paper no,
14/13, 01.05.12, paper no. 14/14 and 01.06.2012, paper no. 14/15 and 30.06.12, paper no.14/16. Apart from
above, the worker has also filed certain photocopies of letters of the branch manager addressed to Regional
Office of the Bank at Agra purported to have been sent through the workman over which the branch manager
had verified his signatures. These documents are paper no. 14/17 to 14/20. He has further filed photocopies
of dispatch register duly verified by the bank which are paper no. 14/21 to 14/69.
50. In his cross examination the worker has admitted that he was engaged as Coolie by the branch manager on
need basis. He was not paid his wages on daily wages rather wages were paid to him on monthly basis
through vouchers. Sometimes bank used to pay him wages 1800/- per month and sometimes Rs.2600/-. He
admitted the fact that he was not issued any appointment letter by the bank and that he was not used to mark
his attendance in the register in the branch. He further admitted that the signatures appearing on paper no.
14/6 to 14/16 which are payment vouchers are not his signatures. It is correct that there is no document on the
record to show that he had rendered continuous service of 240 days but he was paid through vouchers and
lastly he has submitted that the bank dispensed with his services on 12.06.2012.
51. Workman Ram Naresh in I.D. Case No. 111/2013 has examined himself as W.W.3 and has filed his evidence
on affidavit in which he has deposed that on 10.8.99 he was engaged as Part Time Sweeper by the then
Branch Manager, Etah Gramin Bank ( now known as Gramin Bank of Aryavart). He has further deposed that
the bank had paid him wages and bonus as per rules. By an oral order he was transferred to Muhiuddin
2698
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Branch of the Bank as the regular part time sweeper posted at that branch was transferred to Regional Office,
Etah. Witness has further stated that he was working continuously from 12.08.11. Witness has further given
details of payment of wages for the period September 2011 to June 2012. Apart from above statement, the
witness has reiterated the allegations made by him in his petition.
52. W.W.3 in his cross examination has admitted the fact that the bank had engaged him on the post of Coolie on
need basis. He was being paid his wages directly through the branch manager and that monthly wages were
paid to him through voucher. He has further admitted that he was not issued any appointment letter by the
bank. The voucher that are filed along with his petition do not bear his signatures. Witness has stated that his
attendance was marked in the branch but he has not filed any record showing that he had worked
continuously for 240 days. Lastly the witness has stated that he was removed from the service of the bank in
the month of June 2012, but he does not remember the actual date of his termination from the service.
53. This witness along with his affidavit evidence has also filed photocopies of dispatch register duly verified by
the bank, but the witness has not whispered even a single word that the writing appearing on the register is of
his own hand writing and that these documents also do not disclose the fact that actually it was in his name or
documents bear the name of the witness. The documents filed by the witness are paper no.13/16 to 13/22.
54. Lastly worker Pushpendra Kumar has examined himself as W.W.5 and has filed his affidavit in his evidence.
He has also filed photocopies of payment vouchers which are paper no. 12/5 to 12/13 and photocopies of
dispatch register paper no. 12/14 to 12/31. All these documents have been duly verified by the bank.
55. W.W.5 in his evidence has reiterated the same facts which have been pleaded by him in his claim petition
therefore, there is no need to detail those facts again.
56. In his cross examination the above witness has admitted that it is correct that he was engaged as Coolie by
the branch manager. Witness has further admitted that his wages was directly transferred in his account by
the bank and this fact has not been mentioned by him in his affidavit. He was not given any appointment
letter by the bank. The vouchers that are filed along with his affidavit do not bear his signatures. His
attendance was not recorded by the bank and he has not filed any record showing that he had worked for 240
days continuously in the preceding year. Witness has further deposed that he was removed from the service
of the bank in the month of June 12 without making any payment. Witness again stated that he was paid
bonus by the bank after June 2012 but exact amount of bonus is not known to him. Witness has lastly stated
that no record has been filed by him relating to the bonus paid to him by the bank.
57. On the contrary, the bank has examined Shri Rakesh Kumar as M.W.1, who has filed his affidavit in
evidence. This witness has stated that presently he is posted as Manager Gramin Bank of Aryavart, Branch
Punhera, District Etah. M.W.1 in his evidence has further stated that Gramin Bank of Aryavart is a Regional
Rural Bank established under the provision of Section 3 of Regional Rural Bank Act, 1976, and as per the
provision of the Act, Regional Rural Bank shall in discharge of its function be guided by such direction in
regard to matter of Policy as the Central Government may give or make in this behalf. This witness goes on
to state that appointments and promotions in the bank are made as per Government of India guidelines and
prevailing Rules in the Bank are also framed by Government of India in exercise of powers conferred by
section 29 read with section 17 of the Regional Rural Bank Act, 1976 and now known as (RRB
APPOINTMENT 7 PROMOTION RULES 1998). Witness further states that the applicant Jagdish Singh and
other applicants were never appointed to any substantive post in the bank by following the procedures laid
down by Central Government under the said Appointment & Promotions Rules, 1998. Applicant Jagdish
Singh and other applicants were engaged as Coolie in the branch of the Bank; Coolie is a person who is
engaged by the Branch Manager on the emergent need of work and on Day to Day basis. It is further stated
by the witness that none of the workers involved in the case had ever worked as a Coolie for whole month in
the branch and Coolie charge have been paid to the workers on Day-to Day basis who were engaged on the
emergent requirement of the Branch. Coolie charges have been paid to the workers by drawing the amounts
from Contingency Charges and that bank had never paid any wages to the concerned workmen. There exists
no relationship of Master and Servant between the bank and the concerned workmen. Concerned workmen
had never been on the rolls of the bank as they were not in the service of the bank and that none of the
concerned workmen had ever marked their attendance in the bank and that none of the worker had ever held
any Regular and Permanent post in the bank. Bank had never issued any appointment letter to the concerned
workmen in any cadre whatsoever. It is also denied that any of the concerned workman had continuously
worked for 240 days during the period of 12 calendar months preceding the date of their alleged respective
termination. Bank had never terminated the services of the concerned workmen. Service Conditions
applicable on the regular and permanent employees of the bank are not applicable on the concerned
workmen; hence they are not entitled to get any benefits or facilities like regular and permanent employees of
the Bank. Name of none of the concerned workmen had ever been sponsored through the Employment
Exchange or had any one of them ever been subjected to any written test or interview by the bank. Lastly it is
stated by the witness in his affidavit that there is no regular and permanent vacancy in the bank against which
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2699
the concerned claimants are claiming their reinstatement or permanent regularization in the bank, therefore,
none of the claimants have any lien or right on any regular and permanent post.
58. In his cross examination M.W.1 has stated that in the year 1983 he was appointed as an officer in the head
office of Etah Gramin Bank, Etah. Witness has denied the suggestion as to whether it is correct that Officers
and Employees are appointed under Appointment & Promotion Rules 1998. Witness has stated that Coolie is
appointed as per need basis. After going through the document paper no.15/5, the witness has stated that it is
a payment voucher with regard to whosoever is appointed as Coolie and bears the signature of the officer of
the branch i.e. Branch Manager and payment has been mentioned for 26 days. Except holidays, the branch
continues to work for whole month. Similarly the witness after going through paper no.15/17 has stated that
the payment had been made to Coolie but it does not contain the name of the Coolie. Witness has further
admitted that he had appointed a person by name Devendra Jain as Coolie and that he does not remember as
to whether amongst 28 concerned workmen any of them had been appointed or not. Witness has expressed
his complete ignorance about the 28 concerned workmen and whatever has been deposed by him in his
affidavit is correct, but complete whereabouts about the 28 concerned workmen is not known to him. Witness
has further shown his ignorance about the fact that Jagdish or other concerned workers have worked for 240
days or not. Whatever payment vouchers have been filed on the record of the court file is correct. The
witness has denied the suggestion that concerned workers who are alleged to have been removed from the
service of the bank on 30.06.12 have been given any notice or retrenchment compensation. It is not in his
knowledge as to whether concerned workmen were given bonus or not in the year 2013. It is not in his
knowledge that in the year 2013 workman Jagdish was paid bonus or not likewise he has no knowledge that
in City Branch of Firozabad except Coolie there was any regular messenger.
59. I have heard the arguments of both the learned representatives for the parties at length and have given my
anxious considerations to the documents and evidence led by the parties.
60. The learned representative for the workmen has mainly argued that the concerned workers were appointed as
messenger in the bank by the respective Branch Managers as Messenger/Coolie after seeking the approval of
the senior officers of the Bank for doing the regular and permanent work of the bank. The concerned
workmen were used to be paid their wages month wise and all the concerned workers have continued to serve
the bank on the assurances given by the officers of the bank that their services will be regularized as
Messenger in the Branch, but suddenly under the oral order of the Branch Manager their services were
dispensed with from the date mentioned in the reference order without following the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in utter violation of the principle of natural justice. It is also argued that the
bank had neither given any notice nor retrenchment compensation to the concerned workmen at the time of
dispensation of their services, therefore, they are entitled to be reinstated in the service of the bank at the post
of messenger with full back wages and continuity of service.
61. On the contrary the representative for the management has advanced his arguments submitting that none of
the concerned worker had ever been appointed by the bank in any capacity whatsoever; none of the
concerned worker had ever been paid wages by the bank; no appointment letter has been issued to any of the
worker; concerned workers have never been in the regular and permanent employment of the bank; there
existed no relationship of Employer and Employee between the Bank and the concerned workers; none of the
worker had ever completed 240 days of continuous service in the bank preceding 12 calendar year from the
date of their respective termination of the service; the concerned workers have no lien or right against any
regular and permanent post as none of them had ever been subjected to selection process prescribed under
Rules of the Bank, hence in the eye of law the relief claimed by the concerned workers is not liable to be
allowed and the entire claim of the concerned workers are liable to be rejected.
62. Considering the rival contention of the contesting parties it has become essential that the Tribunal should first
examine the fact as to whether the concerned workers have completed 240 days of continuous service
preceding 12 calendar months from the date of their alleged termination as mentioned in the respective
reference order.
63. Weighing the oral as well as documentary evidence adduced by the concerned worker it is abundantly clear
that the concerned workers with one voice have asserted in their oral evidence that they have completed 240
days of continuous service in a year and in support thereof have also filed photocopies of the payment
vouchers which are duly verified by the bank. By a careful examination of these payment vouchers, it is quite
evident that in the payment vouchers the name of the workers have not been mentioned and even each
witness from the side of worker has admitted that these payment vouchers do not bear their signatures.
Therefore, if it is so, how the statement of the witnesses appeared from the side of the concerned workmen
could be believed. Even photocopies of dispatch register filed by the witnesses in support of their claim do
not make it clear that by whom the entries therein have been made and thus these documents are of no help to
the concerned workers and it is not established that the concerned workers have completed 240 days of
continuous service in 12 calendar months preceding the date of their respective termination of service.
2700
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
64. Management witness has categorically asserted in his evidence that no appointment letter was issued to the
concerned workers, none of the concerned worker had ever worked continuously for 240 days, none of the
worker had either been issued any appointment letter or had been paid regular wages from the bank.
Therefore from the evidence of the management witness it stands proved that none of the concerned worker
was ever remained in the employment of the bank or the bank had ever paid regular wages or salary to the
concerned workers.
65. It is also proved from the oral as well as documentary evidence available on the record of the case that there
never existed relationship of Employer and Employee between the Bank and the concerned workers and it is
also established from the evidence of the parties that none of the worker had worked continuously for 240
days preceding 12 calendar months from the date of their respective termination.
66. Needless to mention that it would be futile exercise to examine as to whether any notice or retrenchment
compensation was paid to the concerned workers at the time of dispensation of their services as none of the
concerned worker have specifically pleaded in their claim petition that they worked continuously for 240
days, neither it has been proved.
67. Having concluded that none of the worker had worked continuously for 240 days in the bank, they are not
entitled for any relief as claimed by them in their respective claim petition.
68. Representative for the worker has placed reliance on the following Rulings:-
a)
AIR 1982 SC 854 in the case of L.Robert D’ souza vs Executive Engineer.
b)
1989 LAB IC 623 (PATNA HIGH COURT) IN THE CASE OF STATE BANK OF INDIA VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS.
c)
AIR 2011 SUPREME COURT 2532 IN THE CASE OF DEVINDER SINGH VS MUNICIPAL
COUNCIL SANAUR.
69. The rulings relied by the representative for the worker are distinguishable on facts and law both and they are
not helpful to the concerned workers particularly when it has been held that they have not been able to prove
that they remained in continuous employment of the bank for 240 days preceding 12 calendar months.
70. The representative for the management has also relied upon the following case laws –
1. FLR 2007 (112) 345 in the case of State of M.P. and others vs Lalit Kumar Verma.
2. FLR 2007 (112) Indian Drugs & Pharma Ltd. Vs Workman IDPL S.C.
3. 2006 (110) FLR 803 Manager (Now Regional Director) RBI & Gopi Nath Sharma and others.
4. 2006 (109) FLR 237, Allahabad High Court in the case of Sarjan Kumar vs Central Bank of India and
others.
71. The above case laws have been considered by me. and I am of the opinion that the preposition of law laid
down in the above cited cases fully applies to the facts and circumstances of the case in hand and on the basis
of the same it is once again held that none of the concerned worker are entitled for any relief. After having
heard the arguments of both the parties at length, on scanning of the record and evidence available before the
tribunal, it is inferred that none of the concerned workmen is entitled to any relief.
72. In view of above discussions, the award is adjudicated accordingly.
RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer
Date: 10.04.2019
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 659-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ
Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V
vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- ,y lh
6@2011½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&22013@01@2019&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]
jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2701
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 659.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. LC 6/2011) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni Collieries
Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.
[No. L-22013/01/2019-IR(CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present: Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated the 27th day of February, 2019
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.No. 6/2011
Between:
Sri Kola Rajesham,
S/o Rajaposham,
C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,
Advocate, Flat No.G7,
Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,
Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls,
Kachiguda, Hyderabad .
...Petitioner
AND
1. The Chief General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Ramagundam Area-I,
Karimnagar District.
3. The Superintendent of Mines,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
GDK No.2A incline, Ramagundam Area-I,
Karimnagar District.
…Respondents
Appearances:
For the Petitioner :
M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates
For the Respondent :
Sri S.M. Subhani, Advocate
AWARD
Sri Kola Rajesham who worked as Badli Filler (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed this
petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents M/s. Singareni Collieries
Company Ltd., seeking for declaring the proceeding No. RG.1/PER/S/46/3494 dated 10.6.2008 issued by Respondent
No.1 as illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner
into service duly granting all the consequential benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other
attendant benefits etc., and such other reliefs as this court may deems fit.
2.
The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:
The Petitioner was appointed as Badli Filler w.e.f. 18.2.1997and later he was converted as coal filler in the year 2005.
But during the year 2006 the Petitioner suffered with ill-health and faced other family problems like, suffering of his
father with heart stroke and his elder brother met with an accident, as a result of which, he could not be regular to his
duties. While the matters stood thus, one charge sheet dated 26.3.2007 was issued to the Petitioner by the Respondents
alleging that the Petitioner absented for duty during the year 2006 which amounts to misconduct under company’s
Standing Order No.25.25. Subsequently, one inquiry was conducted and during the time of the enquiry, the Petitioner
was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on such lopsided enquiry,
the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer, the
Petitioner was dismissed from service vide order dated 10.6.2008. It is stated that during the course of the enquiry the
Petitioner has categorically stated about his inability to perform his duties regularly during the above said period as it
was only on account of his ill-health and some family problems. But without considering any of his submissions, the
2702
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Petitioner was dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents’ management in dismissing
the Petitioner from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has
rendered about 11 years of continuous service in the Respondents’ management. The Petitioner approached the
Respondents to consider his case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the
Petitioner was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order No. RG.1/PER/S/46/3494 dated
10.6.2008 issued by Respondent No.1 is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the
Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all other attendant benefits such as continuity of
service, back wages etc..
3.
The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief
which runs as follows:
In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner was
appointed in the Respondents’ company on 21.2.1997 as Badli Filler and later he was appointed as Coal Filler with
effect from 1.8.2006. He was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism, after conducting a detailed
domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has attended the dates fixed for the
enquiry and had fully participated in the enquiry. He was given full, fair and reasonable opportunity to defend
himself in the enquiry. The enquiry was conducted purely following the principles of natural justice. It is stated that
basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer, he submitted his report holding the charges levelled
against the Petitioner was proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry proceeding was sent to the Petitioner
by way of show cause notice giving him an opportunity to make representation against the findings of the enquiry
report; since the charge levelled against the Petitioner is proved and it was serious in nature, punishment warranted
was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the enquiry proceeding and his past record
and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view and lastly, the Respondents were
constrained to dismiss the Petitioner from service. It is stated that in fact the Petitioner was irregular to his duties and
he did not improve his attendance even after issuing charge sheet to him, and after receiving the show cause notice. It
is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is justified and legal and as such the claim petition is
liable to be dismissed in limini.
4.
The domestic enquiry conducted in this case by the Respondents is held as legal and valid vide order dated
16.6.2017.
5.
Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in
support of their claim.
6.
In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:
I.
Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the
punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Kola Rajesham is legal and justified?
II.
Whether the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into service?
III.
If not, to what other relief he is entitled?
7.
Point No.I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner
submitted that due to his illness, and heart stroke to his father and accident to his brother and other family problems,
the Petitioner could not be able to attend his duty sincerely. Even in his show cause the Petitioner has mentioned the
above fact, but it has not been considered during the course of the enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital
punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Petitioner. When the Petitioner has taken a stand that due
to his illness, and other family problems he could not be able to attend his duties regularly and remained absent, the
authority should have considered his case while imposing punishment. The authority has not considered any of the
submissions of the Petitioner, and has given capital punishment to the Petitioner when several modes of punishment
are enumerated in the company’s Standing Orders.
8.
On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that when the
Petitioner was a chronic absentee and was found guilty in the charges levelled against him, the punishment imposed
by the Respondents’ company is legal and proper. When the Petitioner was not sincere in his duty and failed to
maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated in service.
9.
Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to his
illness, and other family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to be regular in his duty, the Petitioner has
remained absent in his duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his absenteeism followed by an enquiry.
In the enquiry, the charges levelled against the Petitioner were proved. For this, capital punishment was imposed.
After dismissal of service, the Petitioner has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family
members. He has already realised his mistake and has taken shelter in the court at the age of 41 years, he is now aged
about 48 years and is searching ways and means to provide bread and butter to his family members. When the
Petitioner being an able bodied and energetic man has already realised his mistake and is coming forward to work
under the Respondents, atleast one chance should be given to him for reinstatement into service. Admittedly several
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2703
modes of punishment are enumerated in company’s Standing Orders. Though the Petitioner is not a first offender but
has worked for about 11 years under the Respondents. While imposing capital punishment to his employees, the
management should think of the condition of the workers as well as his family members. In this case, the punishment
imposed by the Respondents for dismissal of service is too harsh. Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action
taken by the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Kola Rajesham is not legal and
justified.
Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.
10.
Point Nos. II & III: In Point No. I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from
service to Sri Kola Rajesham is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the Petitioner
has already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for his reinstatement into service he should
be given a chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Petitioner has become jobless and
he being the sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family members. In such a
circumstances atleast the Petitioner should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and to work under the
Respondents’ management. But in this case, the Petitioner has not come to the court soon after his dismissal of
service. Therefore, in the opinion of this Tribunal the Petitioner is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in his
claim petition. But he is only entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondents’ management.
Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.
ORDER
Proceeding No. RG.1/PER/S/46/3494 dated 10.6.2008 issued by the 1st Respondent is declared as illegal and
is hereby set aside. It is ordered that the workman Sri Kola Rajesham be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e., a
Badli Filler on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the
company Medical Board and the workman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also
directed to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.
The Workman can not claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman
shall have to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the
management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short
fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman will not be terminated and he will
be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall of
attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without any further notice
and enquiry, and in case the workman completes one year of probation period successfully he will continue in service
till the age of his attaining superannuation. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of
Mine accidents/Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company’s hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms and
conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for
appointment afresh.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 27th day of
February, 2019.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner:
Witnesses examined for the Respondent:
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 660-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ
Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V
vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- ,y lh
7@2011½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
[la- ,y&22013@01@2019&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]
jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
2704
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 660.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. LC 7/2011) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni Collieries
Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.
[No. L-22013/01/2019-IR(CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present: Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated the 26th day of February, 2019
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.No. 7/2011
Between:
Sri Sk. Shareef Pasha,
S/o Hussain Baba,
C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,
Advocate, Flat No.G7,
Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,
Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls,
Kachiguda, Hyderabad .
…Petitioner
AND
1. The Director (P.A. & W),
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Kothagudem. Khammam District.
2. The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri.
Adilabad District.
3. The Colliery Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Kasipet Mine, Mandamarri Area,
Mandamarri. Adilabad District.
… Respondents
Appearances:
For the Petitioner :
M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates
For the Respondent :
Sri S.M. Subhani, Advocate
AWARD
Sri SK. Shareef Pasha who worked as Badli Filler (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed this
petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents M/s. Singareni Collieries
Company Ltd., seeking for declaring the proceeding No. MMR/PER/D/072/10/2982 dated 26.5.2010 issued by the
2nd respondent and the impugned order No.CRP/PER/IR/D/90/2050 dated 15.11.2010 issued by Respondent No.1 as
illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into
service duly granting all the consequential benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other attendant
benefits etc., and such other reliefs as this court may deems fit.
2. The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:
The Petitioner was appointed as Badli Filler w.e.f. 24.3.2007. But during the year 2008 the Petitioner suffered with
ill-health as his left leg was burnt and faced other family problems as a result of which, he could not be regular to his
duties, as the injuries could not be cured for long time. While the matters stood thus, one charge sheet dated
10.1.2009 was issued to the Petitioner by the Respondents alleging that the Petitioner absented for duty during the
year 2008 which amounts to misconduct under company’s Standing Order No.25.25. Subsequently, one inquiry was
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2705
conducted and during the time of the enquiry, the Petitioner was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature
to put forth his grievances. Basing on such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved and
basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer, the Petitioner was dismissed from service vide order dated
26.5.2010 with effect from 16.6.2010. It is stated that during the course of the enquiry the Petitioner has categorically
stated about his inability to perform his duties regularly during the above said period as it was only on account of his
ill-health and some family problems. But without considering any of his submissions, the Petitioner was dismissed
from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents management in dismissing the Petitioner from service
is wholly illegal, arbitrary,violative of the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has rendered continuous service
in the Respondents’ management. The Petitioner approached the Respondents to consider his case sympathetically,
but the management did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the Petitioner was constrained to approach this Tribunal to
declare the impugned order MMR/PER/D/072/10/2982 dated 26.5.2010 issued by the 2nd respondent and the
impugned order No.CRP/PER/IR/D/90/2050 dated 15.11.2010 issued by Respondent No.1 is illegal and arbitrary and
to set aside the same and consequently to direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting
all other attendant benefits such as continuity of service, back wages etc..
3.
The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief
which runs as follows:
In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner was
appointed in the Respondents’ company on 19.6.2007 as Badli Filler and continued to be in the same designation till
the date of his dismissal without regularization. He was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism,
after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has
attended the dates fixed for the enquiry and had fully participated in the enquiry. He was given full, fair and
reasonable opportunity to defend himself in the enquiry. The enquiry was conducted purely following the principles of
natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer, he submitted his report
holding the charges levelled against the Petitioner was proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry
proceeding was sent to the Petitioner by way of show cause notice giving him an opportunity to make representation
against the findings of the enquiry report; since the charge levelled against the Petitioner is proved and it was serious
in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the
enquiry proceeding and his past record and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view
and lastly, the Respondents were constrained to dismiss the Petitioner from service. It is stated that in fact the
Petitioner was irregular to his duties and he did not improve his attendance even after issuing charge sheet to him, and
after receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is justified and
legal and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.
4.
In view of the memo filed by the counsel for the Petitioner conceding the legality and validity of the
domestic enquiry conducted in the present case, the domestic enquiry conducted by the Respondents is held as legal
and valid vide order dated 18.4.2017.
5.
Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in
support of their claim.
6.
In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:
I.
Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the
punishment of dismissal from service to Sri SK. Shareef Pasha is legal and justified?
II.
Whether the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into service?
III.
If not, to what other relief he is entitled?
7.
Point No. I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner
submitted that due to illness, burning of his left leg, the Petitioner could not be able to attend his duty sincerely.
Even in his show cause the Petitioner has mentioned the above fact, but it was not considered during the course of the
enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Petitioner.
When the Petitioner has taken a stand that due to his illness, and other family problems he could not be able to attend
his duties regularly and remained absent, the authority should have considered his case while imposing punishment.
The authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Petitioner, and has given capital punishment to the
Petitioner when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company’s Standing Orders.
8.
On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that when the
Petitioner was a chronic absentee and was found guilty in the charges levelled against him, the punishment imposed
by the Respondents’ company is legal and proper. When the Petitioner was not sincere in his duty and failed to
maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated in service.
2706
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
9.
Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to his
illness, and other family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to be regular in his duty, the Petitioner has
remained absent in his duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his absenteeism followed by an enquiry.
In the enquiry, the charges levelled against the Petitioner were proved. For this, capital punishment was imposed.
After dismissal of service, the Petitioner has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family
members. He has already realised his mistake and has taken shelter in the court at the age of 25 years, he is now aged
about 33 years and is searching ways and means to provide bread and butter to his family members. When the
Petitioner being an able bodied and energetic man, has already realised his mistake and is coming forward to work
under the Respondents, atleast one chance should be given to him for reinstatement into service. Admittedly several
modes of punishment are enumerated in company’s Standing Orders. Though the Petitioner is not a first offender but
has worked for about 8 (eight) years under the Respondents. While imposing capital punishment to his employees, the
management should think of the condition of the workers as well as his family members. In this case, the punishment
imposed by the Respondents for dismissal of service is too harsh. Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action
taken by the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri SK. Shareef Pasha is not legal
and justified.
Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.
10.
Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from
service to Sri SK. Shareef Pasha is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the
Petitioner has already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for his reinstatement into service,
he should be given a chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Petitioner has become
jobless and he being the sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family members. In
such a circumstances atleast the Petitioner should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and to work under the
Respondents’ management. But in this case, the Petitioner has not come to the court soon after his dismissal of
service. Therefore, in the opinion of this Tribunal the Petitioner is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in his
claim petition. But he is only entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondents’ management.
Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.
ORDER
Proceeding No. MMR/PER/D/072/10/2982 dated 26.5.2010 issued by the 2nd Respondent and the impugned
order No.CRP/PER/IR/D/90/2050 dated 15.11.2010 issued by the 1st Respondent is declared as illegal and is hereby
set aside. It is ordered that the workman Sri SK. Shareef Pasha be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e., a badli
filler, on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the company
Medical Board and the workman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also directed
to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.
The Workman can not claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman
shall have to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the
management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short
fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman will not be terminated and he will
be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall of
attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without any further notice
and enquiry, and in case the workman completes one year probation period successfully he will continue in service till
the age of his attaining superannuation. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of Mine
accidents/Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company’s hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms and
conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for
appointment afresh.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 26th day of
February, 2019.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner
Witnesses examined for the Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2707
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 661-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ
Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V
vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- ,y lh
34@2009½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FkkA
[la- ,y&22013@01@2019&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]
jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 661.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. LC 34/2009) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni Collieries
Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.
[No. L-22013/01/2019-IR(CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL-TRIBUNAL-CUM LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated the 19th day of March, 2019
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.No. 34/2009
Between:
Sri S. Anjaiah,
S/o Mallaiah,
C/o Smt. A. Sarojana,
Advocate, Flat No.G7,
Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan,
Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls,
Kachiguda, Hyderabad .
..….Petitione
AND
1.
The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Bellampally (P), Bellampally,
Adilabad District.
2.
The Colliery Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Goleti-2 Incline,
Bellampally,
Adilabad District.
…Respondents
Appearances:
For the Petitioner :
M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates
For the Respondent : Sri S.M. Subhani, Advocate
AWARD
Sri S. Anjaiah who worked as General Mazdoor (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed this
petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents M/s. Singareni Collieries
Company Ltd., seeking for declaring the proceeding No.P.BPA/129/953 dated 1.4.1998 issued by Respondent No.1 as
illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into
service duly granting all the consequential benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other attendant
benefits etc., and such other reliefs as this court may deems fit.
2708
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2.
The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:
The Petitioner was appointed as Badli Filler in 1984 and later he was converted as General Mazdoor. But during the
year 1997 the Petitioner suffered with ill-health and other family problems as a result of which, he could not be
regular to his duties. While the matters stood thus, one charge sheet dated 28.4.1997 was served to the Petitioner by
the Respondents alleging that the Petitioner absented for duty during the year 1997 which amounts to misconduct
under company’s Standing Order No.25.25. Subsequently, one inquiry was conducted and during the time of the
enquiry, the Petitioner was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on
such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved and basing on the erroneous findings of the
Enquiry Officer, the Petitioner was dismissed from service w.e.f. 4.4.1998 vide order dated 1.4.1998. It is stated that
during the course of the enquiry the Petitioner has categorically stated about his inability to perform his duties
regularly during the above said period as it was only on account of his ill-health and some family problems. But
without considering any of his submissions, the Petitioner was dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action
of the Respondents’ management in dismissing the Petitioner from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the
principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has rendered about 14 years of continuous service in the Respondents’
management.The Petitioner approached the Respondents to consider his case sympathetically, but the management did
not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the Petitioner was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned
order No. P.BPA/129/953 dated 1.4.1998 issued by Respondent No.1 is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same
and consequently to direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all other attendant
benefits such as continuity of service, back wages etc..
3.
The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief
which runs as follows:
In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner was
appointed in the Respondents’ company on 17.6.1983 as Badli Filler and later he was regularized as General
Mazdoor with effect from 1.8.1984. He was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism, after
conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has attended
the dates fixed for the enquiry and had fully participated in the enquiry. He was given full, fair and reasonable
opportunity to defend himself in the enquiry. The enquiry was conducted purely following the principles of natural
justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer, he submitted his report holding
the charges levelled against the Petitioner was proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry proceeding was
sent to the Petitioner by way of show cause notice giving him an opportunity to make representation against the
findings of the enquiry report; since the charge levelled against the Petitioner is proved and it was serious in nature,
punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the enquiry
proceeding and his past record and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view and
lastly, the Respondents were constrained to dismiss the Petitioner from service. It is stated that in fact the Petitioner
was irregular to his duties and he did not improve his attendance even after issuing charge sheet to him, and after
receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is justified and legal
and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.
4.
In view of the memo filed by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner conceding the domestic enquiry held in
this case as legal and valid, the domestic enquiry conducted in this case by the Respondents is held as legal and valid
vide order dated 16.6.2010.
5.
Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in
support of their claim.
6.
In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:
I.
Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the
punishment of dismissal from service to Sri S. Anjaiah is legal and justified?
II.
Whether the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into service?
III.
If not, to what other relief he is entitled?
7.
Point No. I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner
submitted that due to his illness and other family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to attend his duty
sincerely. Even in his show cause the Petitioner has mentioned the above fact, but it has not been considered during
the course of the enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on
the Petitioner. When the Petitioner has taken a stand that due to his illness, and other family problems he could not be
able to attend his duties regularly and remained absent, the authority should have considered his case while imposing
punishment. The authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Petitioner, and has given capital
punishment to the Petitioner when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company’s Standing Orders.
8.
On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that when the
Petitioner was a chronic absentee and was found guilty in the charges levelled against him, the punishment imposed
by the Respondents’ company is legal and proper. When the Petitioner was not sincere in his duty and failed to
maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated in service.
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2709
9.
Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to his
illness, and other family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to be regular in his duty, the Petitioner has
remained absent in his duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his absenteeism followed by an enquiry.
In the enquiry, the charges levelled against the Petitioner were proved. For this, capital punishment was imposed.
After dismissal of service, the Petitioner has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family
members. He has already realised his mistake and has taken shelter in the court at the age of 45 years, he is now aged
about 55 years and is searching ways and means to provide bread and butter to his family members. When the
Petitioner being an able bodied and energetic man has already realised his mistake and is coming forward to work
under the Respondents, atleast one chance should be given to him for reinstatement into service. Admittedly several
modes of punishment are enumerated in company’s Standing Orders. Though the Petitioner is a first offender and has
worked for about 14 years under the Respondents. While imposing capital punishment to his employees, the
management should think of the condition of the workman as well as his family members. In this case, the
punishment imposed on the workman by the Respondents for dismissal of service is too harsh. Therefore, it can
safely be stated that the action taken by the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri
S. Anjaiah is not legal and justified.
Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.
10.
Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from
service to Sri S. Anjaiah is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the Petitioner has
already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for his reinstatement into service he should be
given a chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Petitioner has become jobless and he
being the sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family members. In such a
circumstances atleast the Petitioner should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and to work under the
Respondents’ management. But in this case, the Petitioner has not come to the court soon after his dismissal of
service. Therefore, in the opinion of this Tribunal the Petitioner is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in his
claim petition. But he is only entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondents’ management.
Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.
ORDER
Proceeding No. P.BPA/129/953 dated 1.4.1998 issued by the 1st Respondent is declared as illegal and is
hereby set aside. It is ordered that the workman Sri S. Anjaiah be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e., a Badli
Filler on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the company
Medical Board and the workman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also directed
to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.
The Workman can not claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman
shall have to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the
management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short
fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman will not be terminated and he will
be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall of
attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without any further notice
and enquiry, and in case the workman completes one year of probation period successfully he will continue in service
till the age of his attaining superannuation. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of
Mine accidents/ Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company’s hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms and
conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for
appointment afresh.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 19th day of
March, 2019.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner
Witnesses examined for the Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
2710
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 662-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ
Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V
vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- ,y lh
59@2009½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FkkA
[la- ,y&22013@01@2019&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]
jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 662.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. LC 59/2009) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni Collieries
Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.
[No. L-22013/01/2019-IR(CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present: Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated the 18th day of March, 2019
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.No. 59/2009
Between:
Sri Anga Ramulu,
S/o Ramulu,
R/o H.No.14-5-482,
Pittalanagar Post,
Karimnagar.
…Petitioner
AND
1.
The Chief General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Ramagundam Area-I,
Khammam District.
2.
The Superintendent of Mines,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
JDK-2 Incline, Ramagundam Division-I,
Khammam District.
… Respondents
Appearances:
For the Petitioner :
Sri M. Venkata Swamy, Advocate
For the Respondent :
Sri S.M. Subhani, Advocate
AWARD
Sri Anga Ramulu who worked as General Mazdoor (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed this
petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents M/s. Singareni Collieries
Company Ltd., seeking for declaring the dismissal order dated 4.9.2002 issued by the Respondent No.1 as illegal,
arbitrary and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly
granting all the consequential benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other attendant benefits etc.,
and such other reliefs as this court may deems fit.
2.
The Petitioner workman has filed his claim petition and Respondent also filed their respective counter
statement.
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2711
3.
The domestic enquiry conducted in this case is held as legal and valid as it was not contested by the
Petitioner. The case stands posted for arguments, but the Petitioner did not turn up though several opportunities were
afforded to him.
4.
Inspite of availing several opportunities to adduce evidence, the Petitioner workman remained absent and
there is no representation on behalf of the Petitioner, which clearly indicates that perhaps the dispute of the Petitioner
has already been settled. In the circumstances stated above, it is felt that the Petitioner workman has got no claim to
raise. Thus, ‘No dispute’ award is passed.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 18th day
of March, 2019.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner
Witnesses examined for the Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 663-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ
Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V
vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 31@2015½ dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FkkA
[la- ,y&22012@04@2015&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]
jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 663.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 31/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni
Collieries Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.
[No. L-22012/04/2015-IR(CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present: Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated the 19th day of March, 2019
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 31/2015
Between:
The General Secretary (Sh. Riaz Ahmed),
Singareni Miners & Engg. Workers Union (HMS),
Qr. No. C-34, Sector-1, Godavarikhani-505 209.
Karimnagar District (Telengana State).
…Petitioner Union
AND
The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Ramagundam-I Area, Godavarikhani-505 209.
Karimnagar District (Telengana State).
…Respondent
2712
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Appearances:
For the Petitioner :
M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates
For the Respondent :
M/s. Nandigam Krishna Rao, N.S. Pattabhi Rama Rao & J. Narasimulu, Advocates
AWARD
This is a reference issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour and Employment, New Delhi
vide order No. L-22012/04/2015-IR(CM-II) dated 5.5.2015 whereunder this Tribunal is required to adjudicate the
dispute i.e.,
“Whether the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam-I
Area., Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District., in terminating the services of Sri Pothula Narasaiah, Ex-
Coal Filler, GDK-3 Inc., RG-I Area, with effect from 9.12.2013 is justified or not? If not, to what relief
the applicant is entitled for?
After receiving the above said reference this Tribunal registered the case as I D No.31/2015 and issued
notices to both the parties and secured their presence.
2.
The workman filed his claim statement with the averments in brief as follows:
The workman Sri Pothula Narasaiah, was initially appointed as a Badli Filler on 9.11.1992 and later he was
confirmed as Coal Filler on 27.12.1995. He wasregular to his duties and performing his duties upto the
satisfaction of all his superiors. While so, during the year 2001 the younger brother of the Petitioner workman
suffered with mental problems and there was no one to look after his ailing brother in his family. As he had to
take his ailing brother to various hospitals for treatment of mental illness, he could not be regular to his duties
during the year 2001. While the matters stood thus, charge sheet dated 9.10.2002 was issued to him by the
Respondent alleging that the Workman absented for duty during the year 2001, which amounts to misconduct
under company’s Standing Order No.25.25. The workman submitted his explanation to the charge sheet.
Subsequently, one inquiry was conducted and the Workman was not given any opportunity much less valid in
nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as
proved, and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer, the Workman was dismissed from service
w.e.f. 11.12.2003. It is stated that during the course of the enquiry the Workman has categorically stated about
his inability to perform his duties regularly during the year 2001, which was only on account of his younger
brother’s ill-health and other family problems. But without considering any of his submissions, the Workman was
dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondent’s management in dismissing the
Workman from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice. The Workman has
rendered 11 years of continuous service in the Respondent’s management. The Workman approached the
Respondent to consider his case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the
Workman was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order issued by the Respondent is
illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the Respondent to reinstate the Workman
into service duly granting all other attendant benefits such as continuity of service, and back wages etc..
3.
Respondent filed counter with the averments in brief as follows:
In the counter the Respondent while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Workman was
appointed in the Respondent’s company on 9.11.1992 as Badli Filler and subsequently appointed as coal filler on
1.9.1995. He was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism, after conducting a detailed domestic
enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Workman did not attend the enquiry, which was
conducted purely following the principles of natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced
before the Enquiry Officer, the Enquiry Officer conducted the enquiry and submitted his report holding the
charges levelled against the Workman was proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry proceeding was
sent to the Workman by way of show cause notice giving him an opportunity to make representation against the
findings of the enquiry oficer; since the charge levelled against the Workman is proved and it was serious in
nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the
enquiry proceeding and his past record and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take a lenient
view and lastly, the Respondent was constrained to dismiss the Workman from service. It is stated that in fact the
Workman was irregular to his duties and he did not improve his attendance even after issuing charge sheet to him,
and after receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Workman is
justified and legal and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.
4.
In view of the memo filed by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner Union/workman, conceding the
domestic enquiry conducted by the Respondents as legal and valid, the domestic enquiry conducted in this case is
held as legal and valid vide order dated 7.1.2019.
5.
Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in
support of their claim.
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2713
6.
In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:
I.
Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the
punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Pothula Narasaiah is legal and justified?
II.
Whether the Workman is entitled for reinstatement into service?
III.
If not, to what other relief he is entitled?
7.
Point No. I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Workman
argued that due to his younger brother’s ill-health as well as other family problems, the Workman could not be
able to attend his duty sincerely. Even in his show cause the Workman has mentioned the above fact, but it has
not been considered during the course of the enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of
dismissal from service was imposed on the Workman. When the Workman has taken a stand that due to his
younger brother’s illness and other family problems he could not be able to attend his duties regularly and
remained absent, the authority should have considered his case sympathetically while imposing capital
punishment. The authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Workman, and has given capital
punishment to the Workman when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company’s Standing
Orders.
8.
On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent argued that when the
Workman was a chronic absentee and was found guilty of the charges levelled against him, the punishment
imposed by the Respondent’s company is legal and proper. When the Workman was not sincere in his duty and
failed to maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated into service.
9.
Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to
his younger brother’s mental illness and other family problems, the Workman could not be able to be regular in
his duty, the Workman has remained absent in his duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his
absenteeism followed by an enquiry. In the enquiry, the charges levelled against the Workman were proved. For
this, capital punishment was imposed on the workman. After dismissal of service, the Workman has become
jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family members. He has already realised his mistake and has
taken shelter in the court at the age of 42 years, he is now aged about 46 years and is searching ways and means
to provide bread and butter to his family members. When the Workman, being an able bodied and energetic man
and has already realised his mistake, and is coming forward to work under the Respondent, atleast one chance
should be given to him for reinstatement into service at the end of his service period. Admittedly several modes of
punishment are enumerated in company’s Standing Orders. Though the Workman is a first offender and has
worked for about 11 years under the Respondent, while imposing capital punishment to his employees, the
management should think of the condition of the workman as well as his family members. In this case, the
punishment imposed on the workman by the Respondent management for dismissal of service is too harsh.
Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action taken by the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal
from service to Sri Pothula Narasaiah is not legal and justified.
Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.
10.
Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from
service to Sri Pothula Narasaiah is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the
Workman has already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for reinstatement into service
he should be given a chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Workman has become
jobless and he being the sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family
members. In such a circumstances atleast the Workman should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and
to work under the Respondent’s management. But in this case, the Workman has not come to the court soon after
his dismissal of service. Therefore, in the opinion of this Tribunal the Workman is not entitled to get all the relief
as claimed in his claim petition. But he is only entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondent’s
management.
Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.
RESULT:
In the result, the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam-I
Area., Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District., in terminating the services Sri Pothula Narasaiah, Ex-Coal Filler,
GDK-3 Inc., RG-I Area, with effect from 9.12.2003 is not justified and is hereby set aside. It is ordered that the
workman be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e., Badli filler in Cat.I, on initial basic pay without back
wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the company Medical Board and the workman be
kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also directed to take an undertaking of good
behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.
2714
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
The Workman cannot claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman
shall have to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the
management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any
short fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman shall not be terminated
and he will be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of
any shortfall of attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without
any further notice and enquiry and in the event of completion of one year of probation satisfactorily, the workman
is to continue in service till the age of attaining superannuation. The management shall consider any forced
absenteeism on account of Mine accidents/ Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company’s hospital, as
attendance. All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work,
day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for his appointment afresh and the reference is answered accordingly, so
also the, award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 19th day
of March, 2019.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Workman
Witnesses examined for the Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Workman
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 664-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ
Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V
vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 39@2015½ dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FkkA
[la- ,y&22012@24@2015&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]
jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 664.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 39/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni
Collieries Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.
[No. L-22012/24/2015-IR(CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated the 28th day of February, 2019
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 39/2015
Between:
The President
(Bandari Satyanarayana),
Rashtriya Collieries Mazdoor Sangh(INTUC),
Rajkumar Complex, Saibaba Temple Road,
Jaffar nagar, Mancherial – 504208.
Adilabad District.
…Petitioner Union
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2715
AND
The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Bellampally Area, Goleti Township-504292.
Adilabad Distt.
…Respondent
Appearances :
For the Petitioner
:
None
For the Respondent
:
Sri Dasaradha Ramulu, Advocate
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-22012/24/2015-IR(CM-II) dated
18.6.2015 referred the following dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
and their workman under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal. The reference is,
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Bellampalli Area,
Goleti Township(P.O.), Adilabad Distt. in terminating the services of Sri Bandi Raja Komuru, Ex-Coal
Filler, Goleti-2 Inc., SCCo.Ltd., Bellampalli Area with effect from 23.5.2001 is justified or not? If not,
to what relief the applicant is entitled for?”
The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 39/2015 and notices were issued to the parties concerned.
2. The case stands posted for filing of claim statement and documents by the Petitioner.
3. The case was posted for filing of claim statement by the Petitioner union. Inspite of availing several
opportunities, the Petitioner union remained absent and there was no representation on behalf of the
Petitioner/Union. Non-appearance of the workman/Petitioner Union and non-filing of claim statement in time,
clearly indicates that perhaps the parties have settled their dispute and the workman/Petitioner Union has no claim
to raise. Hence, it is not desirable to linger the case to any further date. Thus, the case of the workman/Petitioner
Union is closed and a ‘No dispute’ award is passed.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant, corrected by me on this the 28th day
of February, 2019.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner
Witnesses examined for the
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 665-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
esllZ ,l-bZ-lh-,y ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 80@2001½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS
tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FkkA
[la- ,y&22012@251@2000&vkbZvkj ¼lh-II½]
jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
2716
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 665.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 80/2001) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s SECL and
their workmen, received by the Central Government on 23/04/2019.
[No. L-22012/251/2000-IR(C-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/80/2001
Shri Ram Naresh Vishwakarma,
S/o Mangal Prasad Vishwakarma,
C/o M.L.Vishwakarma,
Asstt. Engineer (St.RE),
MP Electricity Board, Sidhi (MP) …Workman
Versus
Sub Area Manager,
Bungwar Sub Area of SECL,
PO Beomhauri,
Distt. Shahdol (MP) …Management
AWARD
Passed on this 9th day of April 2019
1.
As per letter dated 27-4-2001 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labor, New Delhi, the reference
is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification
No.L-22012/251/2000-IR(C-II). The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action of the management of Sub Area Manager, Bungler Sub Area of SECL, PO
Beomhauri, Distt. Shahdol (MP) in dismissing of Shri Ram Naresh Vishwakarma S/o Shri Mangal
Prasad Viswakarma General Mazdoor Category-I from services from 8-1-96 is legal and justified? If
not, to what relief the workman is entitled?”
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Workman filed statement of claim. In his
statement of claim, workman alleged that he was first appointed as ITI Apprentice in Electrical Trade on
1-12-92 by Dy.Chief Personal Manager of the employers and after completing 1 year training on 1-2-94,
he was appointed as General Mazdoor Category-I on 16-2-94 in pay scale of NCWA-IV by Chief
Personal Manager SECL, Sohagpur. During the course of his employment, he suffered from Hepatitis
and as there was no one to look after him at the project, he went to his brother’s place at Sidhi where he
was referred to Gandhi Clinic for treatment. He was under treatment of consulting Doctor at Gandhi
Clinic Sidhi since November 94, was advised rest, hence unable to perform his duties for about 5 months.
A showcause notice dated 16-4-96 was issued by employer management alleging that he remained
absent since 22-11-94 which was a misconduct under order 26.24 & 26.23 of standing orders and was
required to explain within 74 hours. He sent his reply with medical certificate vide registered letter dated
1-5-95, received by management on 5-5-95, received by management on 5-5-95. It was further alleged
that the workman further suffered from Hepatitis and depression as well psychophobia and was under
continuous treatment of Doctor Praveen Kumar, Medical College Rewa till 27-1-97 and when after
recovery reported himself for duty in the office of employers, he was not permitted to join his duty by the
management. It is the case of the workman that he was never served any notice from the management
regarding any enquiry. He submitted his representation to the management which was not considered.
Thereafter he raised a dispute with the Asstt. Labor Commissioner. After failure of conciliation, the
dispute was referred by the Central Government to this Tribunal. According to the workman, the charge
against him was as follows:-
“On verification of record, it is found that you are absent from your work from 22-11-94 without any
information. This action of yours constitutes misconduct under Section 26.24 and 26.30 of company
stand order.
Section 26.24 Habit of absent without sufficient reason or habit of coming late.
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2717
Section 26.30 To remain absent without sanctioned leave or sufficient reason from work or remain absent
from more than sanctioned leave.”
3. Workman further alleged that the domestic enquiry held by the Enquiry Officer regarding the charges
was improper, invalid and illegal on following grounds, as mentioned in para 17 &18 0f statement of
claim-
Para 17 - That the domestic enquiry held by enquiry officer of the above charges levelled against the
workman/first party was improper, invalid and illegal interalia, on the following grounds:-
(a) That chargesheet was never served to the delinquent workman and thus very initiation of the
disciplinary proceedings was bad in law.
(b) That the enquiry held by the management/ 2nd party was not just proper and lawful as the workman
was not informed duly.
(c) That the principles of the natural justice were not followed by the management/2nd party as the
workman/Ist party was not informed properly therefore, he could not defend his case properly.
(d) The illness of somebody is always beyond his controlled and he cannot be punished for that act
which is not within his control and thus the act of the workman does not cover under the act or so
called misconduct.
(e) That there is not a single evidence on record which could constitute the so called misconduct
(f) That so far as misconduct 26.30 was concerned there arose no occasion to get first leave sanctioned
and only than fell sick, in case of sickness imposition of it as condition present before availing have
neither could nor should be said just and proper nor it was intended by the certified standing orders.
None of the conduct of the delinquent workman constitute or amount to misconduct under the
certified standing order.
(g) That, the enquiry proceeding held behind the back of the workman/Ist party are unjust and illegal as
the principal of natural justice are not followed in this regard.
Para-18: That the Enquiry Officer who conducted the enquiry
(a) Was not acting bonafide and was actuated with some extraneous or ulterior motives.
(b) That the finding of the enquiry officer is perverse, management failed to prove any misconduct of
delinquent workman was charged with.
(c) That the management/second party failed completely to consider the contentions raised by the
delinquent workman in his reply to the showcause notice.
(d) That the punishment imposed on delinquent workman is too severe to smeek of victimization. The
service rendered by this workman were ignored and not taken in account by the management who
awarded with such a harsh punishment to a poor workman.
4. Workman accordingly prayed for declaration of his termination illegal and his reinstatement in job with
all the incidental benefits therewith annual and quarterly bonus with interest.
5. In the Written Statement of defense filed by the employer management, it was pleaded that habitual
absence without leave or long absenteeism without prior permission has to be held misconduct under the
certified standing order applicable to the workman. Workman absented himself without getting his leave
sanctioned and without prior permission. Thereafter a charge sheet was issued against him regarding the
charges of habitual absenteeism without sufficient reason and long absenteeism from duty without prior
information and getting leave sanctioned. Vide order dated 1-7-95, the Enquiry Officer fixed 12-7-95
and notice was sent to the workman on his address furnished by him and recorded in Form B Register,
maintained by office of the management but this notice was returned unserved with the endorsement
that addressee was not available therefore another dated 28-7-95 was fixed by the Enquiry Officer and
other registered notice was sent on the same address which was also returned unserved with the same
endorsement. Thereafter another dated 18-8-95 was fixed as next date in the enquiry and 3rd notice was
sent by registered post on the address which was also returned with the endorsement “addressee’s
whereabouts not known”. In these circumstances, Enquiry Officer proceeded that the enquiry is ex parte
and after recording evidence, submitted his report holding the workman guilty for the charges levelled
against him. According to the proved charges, the attendance for the period of his employment i.e. from
16-2-94 to 22-11-94 i.e. the period in which he was in employment. He absented himself details of
which has been given by the management in para-15 of Written Statement.
2718
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
“That according to the records of colliery it was also proved that the workman was absenting
unauthorizedly without giving intimation to the Manager of the mines since he joined duty. The
attendance for the period of his employment i.e. 16-2-1994 to 22-11-94 till he was absconded without
sanctioned leave/ any intimation to the management is given here under:-
Month
Attendance
February 1994
01 days
March 1994
17 days
April 1994
24 days
May 1994
18 days
June 1994
20 days
July 1994
16 days
August 1994
10 days
September 1994
11 days
October 1994
05days
November 1994
07 days
The Disciplinary Officer after agreeing with the findings of Enquiry Officer regarding proof of misconduct
as mentioned above, the services of workman was terminated after approval of competent authority but
before inflicting punishment, another show cause notice was also given to the workman on 10-10-95 and no
reply was sent by workman. It was also pleaded that appeal was preferred to the Appellate Authority who
did not find any merit in the case and dismissed the appeal vide order dated 11-12/3/98. Since the workman
had absented himself without any information and without any sanctioned leave or any justification, the
enquiry was held against him which was conducted after giving full opportunity to the workman but since
he had absconded from the address furnished by him and was not traceable, the enquiry proceeded exparte
against him. It was also pleaded that the workman never filed any papers regarding treatment or medical
certificate nor did he availed a well equipped treatment facility which is free of cost, provided by the
employers in the hospital maintained by the employers at his work place. Accordingly it was submitted that
the reference be decided against the workman.
6. Workman did not file any rejoinder.
7. On the basis of pleadings, following preliminary issue/point for determination was framed by my learned
predecessor vide order dated 15-6-2010-
8. “Whether the Departmental Enquiry conducted against workman is proper and legal?”
9. After recording evidence on this issue, it was held by my learned predecessor since public notice regarding
enquiry was not issued, the domestic enquiry was not legal and proper against workman. This order is part
of this award.
10. It transpires from the record that the management sought permission to prove charges before the Tribunal.
Management filed documents charge sheet dated 6-4-94, office order dated 1-7-95, notice dated 1-7-95,
registered post notice dated 20-21/7/95, registered post notice dated 29-7-95 ( 2 papers), registered post
statement of witnesses recorded during enquiry, certificate regarding last date of presence issued and filed
during enquiry, attendance particulars filed during enquiry, Enquiry Report, show cause notice dated
10-10-95 regarding the findings of enquiry before passing sentence, recommendation of Disciplinary
Authority, order of termination dated 8-1-96 along with receipt of registered post by which the order was
sent, 2 representations of workman dated 29-1-1967, reminder dated 1997, Order dated 18-3-98 rejecting
the representation and prove it which are Exhibit M-1 to M-23 respectively. Management examined on
oath its witness Rajmani Singh and Manish Bhandari who were cross examined by workman on the point of
proof of charge. Workman examined himself on oath and was cross-examined.
11. I have heard argument of Shri Sanjay Verma, learned counsel for workman and Shri A.K.Shashi, learned
counsel for employers/management and have perused the record. After perusal of record in the light of rival
argument, following other points come up in this case for determination:-
(2)
Whether charges of misconduct levelled against workman has been successfully proved
against the workman?
(3)
Whether the punishment given is disproportionate to the charges levelled?
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2719
12. Point for Determination No.2-
According to Written Statement of defense filed by the management, the charge against workman is that he
was habitual unauthorizedly absenting himself without prior information/ getting leave sanctioned within a
period of his employment from 16-2-94 to 22-11-94 and continuous unauthorized absence without prior
information/ sanction of leave without any justifiable ground for a period 1-12-94 to 30-6-95 and thereafter.
13. According to management, this absence was unauthorized, without any prior intimation/sanction. In his
written statement of claim, workman admits that he suffered from Hepatitis and went to his brother’s place at
Sidhi where he was treated in Gandhi Clinic Sidhi since 18-11-94 and was advised rest hence unable to
perform the duties for 5 months. He was under continuous treatment under Dr.Praveen Kumar, Medical
College, Rewa till 27-1-95 so the absence during the period in the charge atleast so far as it relates to
continuous absence is admitted by the workman himself. This charge is further corroborated by the statement
on oath recorded before the Court by statement of witness Rajmani Singh who was working as a clerk/
timekeeper with the management office. He has stated that workman was working as General Mazdoor
Category -I. he absented himself since December 1994 till 30-6-94 continuously. Regarding 2nd charge of
habitual absentee, this witness has stated on oath that the workman has been absented unauthorizedly without
giving information to the Manager of the Mines since he joined duty. The attendance for the period of his
employment i.e. from 16-2-94 to 22-11-94 is as under:-
Month
Attendance
February 1994
01 days
March 1994
17 days
April 1994
24 days
May 1994
18 days
June 1994
20 days
July 1994
16 days
August 1994
10 days
September 1994
11 days
October 1994
05days
November 1994
07 days
This witness further states that thereafter he absented himself unauthorizedly without any intimation till
30-6-1994. This witness further states that management has provided medical facilities for coal mine workers
for which dispensary and central hospital are opened where free treatments are given by qualified Doctors in
Sohagpur Area but workman did not avail free treatment and never complained of any disease. Workman
never produced any medical certificate for sanction of leave, he absconded from work without any
intimation. this witness further stated that workman never furnish any intimation regarding his whereabouts
during the said period. The witness further stated that the attendance summary register which is Exhibit M-21
is in his signature prepared by him. In his cross examination, this witness has stated that period of absence
mentioned in his affidavit filed as his examination-in-chief, has been stated on the basis of attendance
summary register which is with management. he admits that the recording of attendance was not part of his
job and he pleaded ignorance whether absence of workman was unauthorized or not.
14. Shri Manish Bhandari, Dy.Manager Personnel is another witness of management who has supported the case
of Ist witness of management on the point of habitual absenteeism and unauthorized long absence of
workman as mentioned in the statement of Ist management witness. Thus statement of this witness
corroborates the statement of Ist witness on the point of absence. As has already been mentioned earlier,
absence is not disputed by the workman rather he admits it with a case that he was under treatment during
this period which he was receiving at his brother’s place in Sidhi.
15. Para 106 Indian Evidence Act requires to be referred here which is as under:-
“Burden of proving fact especially within knowledge-When any fact is especially within the knowledge
of any. person, the burden of proving that fact is upon him.”
This fact makes it clear that when a fact is in special knowledge of any person, burden of proving that fact is
on that person hence the burden of proving the fact that he was ill and was under medical treatment during
the period of his absence from duty lies on the workman. This burden can be discharged by filing
documentary evidence for example Medical Certificate, certificate of fitness, documents regarding diagnosis
2720
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
and treatment or by examining the Doctor under whose treatment the workman was during the period in
question. Workman did not file any fitness certificate or medical certificate or any paper regarding diagnosis
or treatment nor did he examined any Doctor under whose treatment he was during the period in question.
The workman has examined himself on oath. He has stated in his affidavit filed as his examination-in-chief
that he never absented himself during his service period whenever he remained on leave, he had filed his
application for leave and during the period of his sickness also, he had filed his application for leave except
this self serving statement, there is no document in support. He admits that the dispensary and hospital
facilities are available to the workman and their families near the mines and in Sohagpur. He pleads
ignorance about the free treatment given to workman in the management’s hospital. When the management
witness has stated that the workman did not file any certificate or papers regarding his illness and treatment,
the burden of proving the fact that he had filed application with the management, is on the workman and he
has failed to discharge this burden. Thus from the comparative analysis of evidence as respect to above
produced by the parties, it comes out that firstly, the workman absented himself during the period as
mentioned above and secondly,the reason for absence alleged by the workman is not established. Hence it is
held that the absence of workman for the period as mentioned above is without sufficient cause, meaning
thereby it is held proved that the workman absented himself during the period in question as referred
above unauthorizedly, without informing the management and without any leave sanctioned. It will not
be out of scope to refer the case of New India Assurance Company Ltd versus Vipin Beharilal Srivastava
reported in (2008)3 Supreme Court Cases 446. The Apex Court has laid down that mere sending an
application for grant of leave is not sufficient. In para-11 of the judgment, the court has observed as follows-
Para-11 The rules governing “leave” read as follows:
(1) General principles governing grant of leave. The following general principles shall govern the grant of
leave to the employees;
(a)
Leave cannot be claimed as a matter of right.
(b)
Leave shall be availed of only after sanction by the competent authority, but one days casual leave
may be availed of without prior sanction in case of unforeseen emergency, provided the head of the
office is promptly advised of the circumstances under which prior sanction could not be obtained.
(4) Sick leave-
(c)
Sick leave can be granted to an employee only on production of a medical certificate from a
registered medical practitioner, which term would include homeopathic, ayurvedic and Unani
Doctor also provided they are registered medical practitioners.
(d)
The certificate should state as clearly as possible the diagnosis and probable duration of treatment.”
16. A reference of Rule 12.5 & Rule 13 of Certified Standing Orders applicable in the case of parties , referred to
by learned counsel for management is also necessary which is as under:-
Rule 12.5: Application for leave or extension of leave on medical grounds shall be supported by a
certificate from a Medical Officer of the company or where there is no such officer, a government Medical
Officer or failing him, from a Registered Medical practitioner, stating the period for which leave is
recommended. On receipt of such application, the sanctioning authority shall immediately inform the
workman in writing whether the leave or extension of leave has been granted and if so for what period. An
employee who has been sanctioned leave or an extension of leave on medical ground for a period exceeding
14 days at a time shall not be allowed to resume duty unless he produced a certificate o fitness. If no
information is received by the workman, from the management, regarding leave in question as applied for,
it may be presumed to be granted.”
Rule-13: Application for leave:- A workman who desires to obtain leave of absence shall apply in writing
to the Competent Authority, not less than 15 days before the commencement of the leave, except where
leave is required in unforeseen circumstances and the competent authority shall issue orders on the
application within a week of its submission of two days prior to the commencement of the leave applied for
whichever is earlier, provided that if the leave applied for is to commence on the date of the application or
within three days thereof orders shall be given on the same day. If the leave is refused or postponed, the fact
of such refusal or postponement and the reasons therefor shall be recorded in writing in a register to be
maintained for the purpose and if the workman so desires a copy of the entry in the register shall be
supplied to him. If the workman after proceeding on leave, desires an extension thereof, he shall apply to
the competent authority who shall send a written reply either granting or refusing extension of leave to the
workman. Sanction/ refusal of leave shall be communicated to the workman in writing.
Similarly Rule 26.24 & 26.25 which deal with misconduct are also being reproduced as follows:-
Rule 26.24- Habitual late attendance or habitual absence from duty without sufficient cause.
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2721
Rule 26.25- Distributing or exhibiting in the company’s work premises or estates, hand bills, pamphlets,
posters or causing them to be displayed by means of signs or writing or other visible representations any
matter prejudicial to the company without prior sanction of the management.
It is therefore, held in the light of evidence discussed above that the workman failed to comply the
provisions and his absence, held unauthorized and habitual, the charges against the workman are held
proved.
Point No for determination No.2 is answered accordingly.
17. Point for determination No.3- Rule 27.1 of certified standing order provides about penalties in case of
misconduct. One of the penalty is removal/discharge from service and dismissal from service. Now question
arises whether the punishment of removal of workman on the charges proved as mentioned is proportionate
to the misconduct or not.
18. Learned counsel for management has referred to case Ever Ready Industries India Ltd, Jabalpur and
others versus P.S.Parihar and another reported in 2003(3)MPHT-257 wherein it has been observed by
the Hon’ble High Court that employer has justified in weeding out the worthless who have lost utility
for the company. In the referred case, also the workman remained continuously sick for a long period and
did not recover. His termination was confirmed by Hon’ble High Court. In case of New India Assurance
Company Ltd.(Supra) also, the Apex Court refused to set-aside the dismissal of employee who remained
continuously absent for long period without any justification. Keeping this preposition of law inn view, the
dismissal of workman for the charges is held legal and justified. Workman is held not entitled to any relief.
Point No.2 is answered accordingly.
19. In the result, award is passed as under:-
(1) The action of the management of Sub Area Manager, Bungler Sub Area of SECL in dismissing
Shri Ram Naresh Vishwakarma S/o Shri Mangal Prasad Viswakarma General Mazdoor
Category-I from services from 8-1-96 is legal and justified.
(2) The workman Shri Ram Naresh Vishwakarma is not entitled to any relief.
20. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labor & Employment as per
rules.
Dated:9-4-2019
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 666-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
eSllZ Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa
fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la-
40@2015½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
[la- ,y&22012@25@2015&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]
jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 666.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 40/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni
Collieries Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.
[No. L-22012/25/2015-IR(CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
2722
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated the 28th day of February, 2019
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 40/2015
Between:
Sri Ramtenki Kistaiah,
H.No.1-85,
Bellampalli (M)-504251.
Adilabad Distt.
…Petitioner
AND
The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Bellampally Area, Goleti Township-504292.
Adilabad Distt.
…Respondent
Appearances:
For the Petitioner
:
None
For the Respondent
:
Sri Dasaradha Ramulu, Advocate
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-22012/25/2015-IR(CM-II) dated 18.6.2015
referred the following dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their
workman under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal. The reference is,
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Bellampalli Area,
Goleti Township(P.O.), Adilabad Distt. in terminating the services of Sri Ramtenki Kistaiah, Ex-Badli Filler,
Goleti-1 Inc., SCCo.Ltd., Bellampalli Area with effect from 1.4.2005 is justified or not? If not, to what relief
the applicant is entitled for?”
The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 40/2015 and notices were issued to the parties concerned.
2.
The case stands posted for filing of claim statement and documents by the Petitioner.
3.
The case was posted for filing of claim statement by the Petitioner. Inspite of availing several opportunities,
the Petitioner remained absent and there was no representation on behalf of the Petitioner. Non-appearance of the
Petitioner and non-filing of claim statement in time, clearly indicates that perhaps the parties have settled their dispute
and the Petitioner has no claim to raise. Hence, it is not desirable to linger the case to any further date. Thus, the case
of the Petitioner is closed and a ‘No dispute’ award is passed.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant, corrected by me on this the 28th day of February,
2019.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner
Witnesses examined for the Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2723
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 667-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
eSllZ Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa
fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la-
66@2013½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
[la- ,y&22012@51@2013&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]
jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 667.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 66/2013) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni
Collieries Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.
[No. L-22012/51/2013-IR(CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated the 26th day of February, 2019
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 66/2013
Between:
The General Secretary (Sri Riaz Ahmed),
M/s. Singareni Mines & Engg. Workers Union (HMS),
Qr.No.C-34, Sector-I,
Godavarikhani – 505 209, Karimnagar District.
…Petitioner Union
AND
The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Limited,
Ramagundam-I Area,
Godavarikhani – 505 209.
Karimnagar Distt.
…Respondent
Appearances:
For the Petitioner
:
M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocate
For the Respondent
:
M/s. P.A.V.V.S. Sarma & Vijaya Laxmi Panguluri, Advocates
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-22012/51/2013-IR(CM-II) dated
30.5.2013 referred the following dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
and their workman under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal. The reference
is,
SCHEDULE
‘‘Whether the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam-I Area,
Godavarikhani, Karimnagar Distt. In terminating the services of Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani, Ex-Staff
Nurse, Area Hospital SCCo. Ltd., Ramagundam-I Area, Godavarikhani Area w.e.f. 18.1.2000 is justified or
not? If not, to what relief the applicant is entitled for?”
The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 66/2013 and notices were issued to the parties.
2.
The averments made in the claim statement in brief are as follows:
The Petitioner Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani, was appointed as Staff Nurse on 4.8.1989 and was working for the
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. While so the concerned work woman has applied for 3 days leave from
2724
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
29.5.2005 to 3.6.2005 and also availed play day on 4.6.2005. But she could not report for the duty on 5.6.2005 as her
father was in serious condition and her presence was very much essential and she continued to assist him regularly. In
the mean while, the concerned workwoman also fell sick and her daughter Kum. Alekhya Jayanthi also fell sick.
While the matters stood thus, charge sheet dated 13.12.2005 was issued to the Petitioner by the Respondents alleging
that the Petitioner absented for duty during the year 2008 which amounts to misconduct under company’s Standing
Order No.25.25. Subsequently, one inquiry was conducted and during the time of the enquiry, the Petitioner could not
submit her explanation to the charge sheet and that she could not participate in the enquiry also. As a result of which
an exparte enquiry was conducted. Basing on such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved
and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer, the workwoman was dismissed from service vide order
dated 31.8.2006 with effect from 7.9.2006. But without considering any of her submissions, the workwoman was
dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents management in dismissing the Petitioner
workwoman from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner
workwoman has rendered about 17 years of continuous service in the Respondents’ management. The Petitioner
workwoman approached the Respondents to consider her case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any
heed to it. Therefore, the Petitioner workwoman was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned
order No.CRP/PER/IR/D/92/4831 dated 31.8.2006 issued by the 1st respondent is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside
the same and consequently to direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner workwoman into service duly granting
all other attendant benefits such as continuity of service, back wages etc..
3. The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief
which runs as follows:
In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner
workwoman was appointed in the Respondents’ company on 6.8.1989 as Junior Staff Nurse and was promoted to ‘C’
and ‘B’ grades on 8.9.1980 and 4.9.2000 respectively and has been working in Sector-III dispensary of the
Respondents’ company. It is submitted that the Petitioner workwoman was sanctioned 6 days leave for the period
from 29.5.2005 to 3.6.2005. She was to report for duty on 5.6.2005, but she did not resume her duty on 5.6.2005,
and has been continuously absenting from duty. She was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism,
after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner did not
attend on the dates fixed for the enquiry and finally as a last chance the enquiry notice was published in the Telugu
Daily Newspaper on 5.5.2006 fixing the date of enquiry, but she did not attend the enquiry on the date fixed. She was
given full, fair and reasonable opportunity to defend herself. As such, an exparte enquiry was conducted purely
following the principles of natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer,
he submitted his report holding the charges levelled against the Petitioner was proved. A copy of the enquiry report
and the enquiry proceeding was sent to the Petitioner workwoman by way of show cause notice giving her an
opportunity to make representation against the findings of the enquiry report; since the charge levelled against the
Petitioner workwoman is proved and it was serious in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The
Disciplinary Authority has gone through the enquiry proceeding and her past record and found that there was no
extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view and lastly, the Respondents were constrained to dismiss the Petitioner
workwoman from service. It is stated that in fact the Petitioner workwoman was irregular to her duties and she did
not improve her attendance even after issuing charge sheet to her, and after receiving the show cause notice. It is
further stated that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner workwoman is justified and legal and as such the claim
petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.
4.
In view of the memo filed by the counsel for the Petitioner not to contest the validity of the domestic enquiry
conducted in the present case, the domestic enquiry conducted by the Respondents is held as legal and valid vide order
dated 14.9.2017.
5.
Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in
support of their claim.
6.
In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:
I.
Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the
punishment of dismissal from service to Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani is legal and justified?
II.
Whether the Petitioner workwoman is entitled for reinstatement into service?
III.
If not, to what other relief she is entitled?
7.
Point No. I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner
workwoman submitted that due to her illness, illness of her father and also her daughter, the Petitioner workwoman
could not be able to attend her duty sincerely. Even in her representation the Petitioner workwoman has mentioned
the above fact, but it has not been considered during the course of the enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital
punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Petitioner workwoman. When the Petitioner workwoman
has taken a stand that due to her illness, and other family problems she could not be able to attend her duties
regularly and remained absent, the authority should have considered her case while imposing punishment. The
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2725
authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Petitioner workwoman, and has given capital punishment
to the Petitioner workwoman when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company’s Standing Orders.
8.
On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that when the
Petitioner workwoman was a chronic absentee and was found guilty in the charges levelled against her, the
punishment imposed by the Respondents’ company is legal and proper. When the Petitioner workwoman was not
sincere in her duty and failed to maintain minimum musters in a year she is not entitled to be reinstated in service.
9.
In fact, due to illness the Petitioner has remained absent in her duties and a proceeding was initiated against
her for her absenteeism followed by an enquiry. In the enquiry, the Petitioner workwoman did not participate and the
charges levelled against the workwoman were proved. For this, capital punishment has been imposed. After
dismissal of service, the workwoman has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to her family members.
She has already realised her mistake and has taken shelter in the Tribunal and is ready to provide bread and butter to
her family members. When she has already realised her mistake atleast one chance should be given to her for
reinstatement into service. Admittedly several modes of punishment are enumerated in company’s Standing Orders.
The Petitioner workwoman is a first offender and has worked more than 17 years under the Respondents. When
punishment has been imposed, her past conduct has not been considered. While imposing capital punishment to his
employees, the management should think of the condition of the workwoman as well as her family members, so also
her past conduct. In this case, the punishment imposed by the Respondents for dismissal of service is too harsh.
Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action of the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal from
service to Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani is not legal and justified.
This point is answered accordingly.
10.
Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from
service to Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when
the Petitioner workwoman has already realised her mistake and has come to the Tribunal with a prayer for her
reinstatement into service she should be given a chance to serve for her family members. Now, after dismissal of
service the workwoman has become jobless and she being the sole earning member of her family, is unable to
provide a square meal to her family members. In such a circumstances, atleast the Petitioner workwoman should be
given a chance to maintain her livelihood and to work under the Respondents’ management. But, in the circumstances
stated above, the workwoman is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in her petition. But the Petitioner
workwoman is entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondents’ management.
Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.
Result:
The action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam-I Area,
Godavarikhani, Karimnagar Distt. in terminating the services of Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani, Ex-Staff Nurse, Area
Hospital SCCo. Ltd., Ramagundam-I Area, Godavarikhani Area w.e.f. 18.1.2000 is not justified. Proceeding No.
CRP/PER/IR/D/92/4831 dated 31.8.2006 issued by Respondent No.1 is declared as illegal and is hereby set aside. It
is ordered that the workwoman Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e., Staff
Nurse on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the company
Medical Board and the workwoman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also
directed to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workwoman at the time of her posting.
The workwoman can not claim for her posting in the same place, where she was last employed. The
workman shall have to either maintain minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the
management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short
fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman will not be terminated and she
will be cautioned to improve her performance by issuing her a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall
of attendance during one year of service of the workman, she will be terminated from service without any further
notice and enquiry. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of Mine accidents/ Natural
disasters, taking treatment in the company’s hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms and conditions of
appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for appointment
afresh.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 26th day of
February, 2019.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer
2726
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the
Witnesses examined for the
Petitioner
Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 668-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
eSllZ ,u-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 9@2014½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS
tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23-04-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&22015@12@2013&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]
jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 668.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 9/2014) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of NCL and their
workmen, received by the Central Government on 23-04-2019.
[No. L-22015/12/2013-IR(CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/9/2014
General Secretary,
Bhartiya Koyla Khadan Shramik Sandh (BMS),
Amlohri Project Branch,
PO Amlohri,
Distt. Sidhi (MP)
…Workman
Vs.
Chief General Manager,
Amlohri Project, NCL,
PO Amlohri,
Distt. Sidhi (MP)
…Management
AWARD
Passed on this 5th day of April, 2019
1.
As per letter dated 28-1-2014 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labor, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-
22015/12/2013-IR(CM-II).The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the fixation of Shri Madhusudan Prasad Mishra by the Chief General Manager, Amlohri
Project, NCL PO Amlohri, Distt. Singrauli on his (Shri Mishra’s) requested reversion due to ill-health
to the post of Driver Category-V from Dumper Operator Category Grade II was not in order as his
promotion/ upgradation were not taken into consideration. If so, what benefit Shri Madhusudan
Prasad Mishra be entitled to i.e. arrears of difference of pay and promotion?
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2727
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Workman filed statement of claim. In his
statement of claim, he submitted that he was initially appointed as Driver Cat-V on 15-5-84, promoted as
dumper operator Grade II on 20-2-87 and later on he got salary to the post of Dumper Operator Grade I
because he operated higher capacity machine.
3. Vide order dated 11-4-94 issued by Dy.Chief Personal Manager, Amlohri Project, he was reverted due to
illness i.e. asthma which was born due to sand and dust. On 11-4-94, he was getting salary @Rs.71.43 as
basic pay and after his reversion as Driver Category V, his basic pay was reduced and was fixed @ Rs.44.50.
vide order dated 7-6-1999, his salary was protected on the basis of recommendation and past services and he
was fixed at basic pay of Rs.104.90 per day which is related to the salary of Dumper Operator Grade II. It
was also alleged that at per cadre scheme of N.C.L. the post of driver operator and car operator are of two
different cadres and further that vide order dated 6/7-11-2003, workman was selected as crane operator
Grade-III, and at present working as crane operator Grade I. It is the claim of workman that at the time of
reversion i.e. on 11-4-94, wages of workman were fixed in the pay scale provided in NCWA-IV(National
Coal Wage Agreement) and at the time of protection of pay provided in NCWA-V, hence the workman is
entitled to get the difference of wages and pay for the period from 11-4-94 to 7-6-99. Accordingly, workman
has claimed the difference of wages from 11-4-94 to 7-6-99 as per NCWA-IV & V which is about 6 lakhs.
4. In their written statement of defense, the employers admitted that the workman was initially appointed as
Driver Cat-V as alleged by him and was working as dumper operator Grade I in the pay scale of 31.99-1.76-
56.63(MCWA-III) and his basic salary was fixed Rs.33.75 per day. On 29-3-94, he submitted an application
before Chief General Manager stating that he was suffering from asthma and has been medically advised to
avoid dust hence unable to perform the duties of dumper operator. He expressed his desire to go back on the
job of Driver Cat-V for which he expressed his readiness and willingness to accept wages of Driver Category
V. The management after considering his request, re-designated him as Driver Category V w.e.f. 11-4-94 and
his basic was fixed initially in the pay scale of 44.50-1.62-67.18 (NCWA-IV). His basic was fixed after re-
designation in post of Driver Category V as under:-
a. Shri Madhusudan Prasad Mishra was appointed as Driver Cat-V w.e.f. 15-6-84,
b. Promoted to the post of Dumper Operator Gr-II w.e.f. 20-2-87
c.
Promoted to the post of Dumper Operator Grade I w.e.f. 28-2-89
d. Basic pay drawn in the post of Dumper Operator Grade I
In NCWA IV
In NCWA V
1-3-92 Rs.66.19
1.3.92 Rs.98.95
1-3-93 Rs.68.81
1-3-93 Rs.103.50
1-3-94 Rs.71.43
1.3.94 Rs.108.05
A representation dated 26-8-97 by the Union in this respect on the ground that before re-designation
as Driver Cat-V. workman was getting basic pay of Rs.108.05 per day in the post of Dumper Operator Grade
I. This remuneration was deducted and Union was informed by the management vide letter dated 8-12-96.
Workman further file a case before the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate Singrauli but could not succeed.
It was decided that since workman was selected for the post of dumper operator to Driver and was again re-
designated as Driver hence his pay might be fixed for the post of Driver Cat-V as if he was not selected for
the post of Dumper Operator and he would get increment benefit of Driver Cat-V meaning thereby he was
appointed on 15-6-84 and his pay be fixed with awarding normal increment of Driver Cat V from 1-7-85 but
actual monetary benefit may be given with immediate effect and no arrear will be paid consequent upon the
new fitment. Also, it was decided that consequent upon placement in Cat-V, workman will not claim
promotion to the post of Driver Cat-VI cum Mechanic in case his juniors were promoted. This decision was
taken after prolonged discussion with the workman. Accordingly, the management prayed for rejection of his
claim.
5. In his rejoinder, the workman states that copy of application of workman dated 21-3-94 Annexure M-1 filed
by the employers shows that the workman only requested for change of place of duty and the employers did
not pass any order on his application on Annexure M-1. Workman filed another application dated 29-3-94,
copy filed by the management which he had filed at the instance & assurance of employers that his pay will
be protected and it is on that application filed by the workman on assurance by the management that his pay
would be protected, the employers passed order dated 11-4-94, copy filed by employers with their Written
Statement of defense. Workman reiterated allegations that employers passed order dated 7-6-99 protecting
his salary w.e.f. 11-4-94 but stated in the order that workman would not get the monetary benefits and no
arrear arise out of fixation. This order dated 7-6-99 is illegal and discriminatory because similarly placed
workman George Koshi, R.D.Patel, B.K.Singh, G.S.Pandey, working in other projects of the same employers
have been granted pay protection.
2728
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
6. Workman has examined himself on oath and has filed 3 photocopy documents which are office order dated
30-9-91, 18-2-89 & 9-1-99 relating to Kakri project. These orders relate to other workman R.D. Patel,
B.P.Dwivedi and George Koshi as stated by him in his rejoinder.
7. Management examined Sunil Kumar Jha, General Manager of the Amlohri Project on oath and proved
documents- application dated 21-3-94 & 29-3-94, office order dated 11-4-94, letter dated 8-12-97 of
management sent to Union which are Exhibit M- 1 to M-4 respectively.
8. Shri S.K. Mishra appeared on behalf of workman and Shri A.K.Shashi for employer. I have heard argument
of learned counsel from both the sides and have gone through the record.
9. On perusal of record in the light of rival argument, following points came up for determination in the present
case:-
(1) Whether the refusal of arrears regarding difference of pay/ wages during the period 11-4-94 to
7-6-99 by the management is justified in law and fact?
(2) Whether the workman is entitled to any arrear of difference of pay?
10. Point for Determination No.1-
Admitted between the parties is the fact that while workman was working as Dumper Operator Grade I, he
was reverted to Driver Cat-V on his application. Date of order of reversion is 11-4-94. According to the
workman, he filed an application on 21-3-94 requesting him to allot duty at another place because working as
dumper operator in sand and fumes is adversely affecting his health. This application has been proved by
management’s witness at Exhibit M-1. Perusal of this application reveals that following order was passed on
the application by management-
“Dy.CPM- please issue a letter to Shri M.P.Mishra (worker) that as dumper operator, he cannot get a place
out of mine area. If he will give option for demotion to the post of Driver Cat V, he can be posted in
dispensary or else where out of the mine.”
This document has been admitted by the workman also. The other application filed by workman on 29-3-94,
copy filed by management, admitted by workman, proved by management witness at Exhibit M-2 makes it
clear that in its 2nd application, workman expressed his willingness to change his post from dumper operator
to Driver and also expressed his consent and accepted hat he will accept whatever salary admissible to him as
per rules on his changed place. There is an order of the management side which reads as under:-
“ He should be engaged as Driver Cat-V and should also be paid wages of Driver Cat-V. he would be posted
in hospital – signed on 29th March”
Exhibit M-3 proved by management’s witness, admitted by the workman is the formal office order dated
11-4-94 passed by Dy.Chief Personal Officer on his application dated 29-3-94. This order reads as under:-
“Shri Madhusudhan Prasad Mishra Dumper Operator vide his application dated 29-3-94 has requested for
Driver job as he is suffering from asthma disease and unable to perform duty of Dumper Operator. His
request has been considered and he is hereby re-designated as Driver Cat-V w.e.f. 11-4-94 and his basic will
be fixed Rs.44.50-1.63-67.18. Shri Mishra is directed to report for duty to Medical Superintendent Amlohri.”
11. Workman has stated on oath that the application dated 29-3-94 was filed by him under the assurance by the
management that he will be adjusted out of field duty as a Driver on the same pay and wages he was getting
as Dumper Operator Grade I. Management side has denied this allegation in their written statement of
defense. Hence, the burden of proving the fact that workman filed application dated 29-3-94 on the
assurance given by management regarding protection of his salary and wages will be on the workman. There
is nothing on record except the self serving statement of workman on this point. the office order referred to
above passed on the application of workman and the endorsement of the Manager on the application of
workman M-3 & M-2 respectively, do not state that his pay shall be protected after changing his job from
Dumper Operator Grade I to Driver Cat-V. Moreover in Para-5 of the Written Statement of the claim,
workman has stated that vide order of management dated 7-6-99, his salary was protected on the basis of
representation and past services and he was fixed at Rs.104.90 per day. This pay is relating to post of dumper
operator Grade II. Hence, this allegation of workman where he admits that his salary was protected by order
of management dated 7-6-99 shows that his grievances were redressed. As regards, payment of arrears of
salary for the period between 11-4-94 to 7-6-99, there is no such order regarding payment. The point arises
here is whether management was under obligation to pay arrears or not. No rule or cercular has been cited by
workman which provides the management to pay arrears of pay and wages in such a situation. It is further the
case of workman in his rejoinder that similarly placed other workers viz George Koshi, R.D.Patel, B.K.Singh
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2729
and Shri G.S.Pandey were granted arrears when their cadre was changed. The management has first denied
it.
12. Learned counsel for management has submitted that these workmen are not the employees of Amlohri
Project rather they are employees of Kakri and other projects under different managements hence any order
of the management of other project will not be binding on present employers. Learned counsel for workman
has rebutted this argument with submission that all projects are owned and managed by NCL hence simply
because the projects are different, no discrimination can be done in similar circumstances as it has been done
in the case in hand which requires to be rectified.
13. Point further arises that whether workman has successfully proved this fact in the case in hand or not. Perusal
of record reveals that application was filed by workman directing the management to produce the service
records of R.D.Patel, B.K.Singh and George Koshi. The management opposed this application stating that
their service records are not with them because these workers are employees of different projects and their
service records are maintained in the office of that project. This application for summoning document was
dismissed by my learned predecessor that the management in the case in hand cannot be directed to produce
these service records because the records were not in their possession and control. Workman could file an
application for summoning the records from the offices where they were maintained but he did not do so
hence a simple self serving statement of workman that in similar cases of cadre change, arrears of difference
in salary were given to Shri B.K.Singh, George Koshi and R.D.Patel, which is not supported by any
document is not sufficient to prove this assertion of workman. Moreover, there is on record photocopy of
office order dated 30-9-91, 18-2-89 & 9-1-99 which is inadmissible because it has not been proved. These 3
documents are office orders subsequent upon change of cadre of employees R.D.Patel, B.K.Singh and
George Koshi Even in these inadmissible documents,there is no order regarding payment of arrears of
difference of wages rather it has been specifically denied to them. Hence, in such a circumstance, and in the
light of facts and evidence as mentioned above, there is nothing on record to hold that management was not
justified in refusing arrears of difference of pay to the workman for the period 11-4-94 to 7-6-99.
Accordingly it is held that refusal of management to pay arrear of pay to the workman subsequent to
his change of cadre from post of dumper operator Grade I to Driver Cat-V is not unjustified in law or
fact. Point No.1 is answered accordingly.
14. Point for Determination No.2-
In the light of my finding in Point No.1, this point is answered in negative holding that the workman is not
entitled to any relief.
15. In the result, award is passed as under:-
(1) The action of the management in not paying arrear of pay to the workman subsequent to his
change of cadre from post of Dumper Operator Grade I to Driver Cat-V is proper and legal.
(2) Workman Shri Madhusudan Prasad Mishra is not entitled to any relief.
16. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labor & Employment as per
rules.
Dated: 5-4-2019
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 669-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
esllZ lSUVªy cSad vkWQ bafM;k ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 92@2013½ dks izdkf'kr
djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26-04-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&12012@62@2013&vkbZvkj ¼ch-II½]
lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
2730
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 669.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 92/2013) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Central Bank of
India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 26.04.2019.
[No. L-12012/62/2013-IR(B-II)]
SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/92/2013
Shri Vinod Kumar Srivas,
Ward No.4, Maa Baba Chowk,
Bahmni Banjer, Mandla (MP)
…Workman
Versus
Sr. Regional Manager,
Central Bank of India,
601, Napier Town,
Jabalpur (MP)
…Management
AWARD
Passed on this 3rd day of April, 2019
1. As per letter dated 30-9-2013 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labor, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-
12012/62/2013-IR(B-II). The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action of the management of the Central Bank of India in terminating the services of
Shri Vinod Kumar Srivas is legal and justified? What relief the claimant is entitled for and from which
date?”
2. In his statement of claim, the applicant workman has stated that he was appointed/ entered in the service of
the employer Bank in Bahmni Banjer Branch on 6-4-2002 as peon cum safai worker and worked till 12-2-
2013 without any break in service. At the time of his termination, he was paid fixed wages @ Rs.1850 per
month. He discharged his duties faithfully and diligently like any permanent employee, worked even on
holidays and had completed more than 240 days in each calendar year for about 11 years continuously. He
was initially paid Rs.740 per month which was raised up to Rs.1850 per month during the course of his
employment. The post on which the workman was working was regular in nature. Vacancies for the post
were advertised. Workman also submitted his application, to be forwarded to Regional Office of the
employer Bank but it was not sent in time due to malafide on the part of employers depriving him an
opportunity to appear in the selection process for the vacancies. He agitated against this and the Branch
Manager of the employer Bank terminated his services verbally from 12-2-2013. He had worked 240 days in
the year preceding the date of his termination. No notice or salary was given to him hence the termination is
violative of Section 25-F of ID Act, is also violative of principles of natural justice hence amounting to
illegal retrenchment, victimization and unfair labor practice. It was also alleged that after his termination,
workman has been out of gainful employment and has been unable to get job anywhere. His family is living
in starvation because he is the only earning member of the family. Accordingly, the workman has prayed for
declaring illegal and setting aside his termination and direction to employers to reinstate him with full
backwages.
3. In their Written Statement of defense, employers have flatly denied the allegation that the workman was ever
employed by them in any capacity. It was also pleaded that he was neither engaged as a daily wager or part
time worker of the Bank. He was not an employee of the Bank. Bank never directed him to work in any
Branch of the Bank. There is no relationship of workman and employer between the parties hence there is no
question of his completing 240 days in employment/ engagement of the employer Bank preceding the date of
his termination. Also, it was pleaded that the Bank issued publication on 2-11-2012 in newspaper regarding
vacancies of Safaikarmchari and peon but the application of the workman could not reach to its Regional
Office in time hence he was not considered. There has been no violation of Section 25-F or any provision of
ID Act. Accordingly, it has been prayed that the claim of the workman be dismissed as such.
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2731
4. In evidence, workman filed peon book (7 pages), payment vouchers (4 pages), written application to
Regional office of the Bank regarding his application w.r.t. vacancies ( 1 page), certificate issued by Branch
Manager alongwith the application (1 page each). Letter of Branch Manager dated 28-11-2011(2 pages), all
admitted by employers marked Exhibit W-1 to W-6 respectively. Workman also filed copy of
communication dated 23-2-2013 issued by Bank to him stating the reasons of non-consideration of his
application. In the recruitment process with regard to vacancies advertised which is also admitted by
employers is Exhibit W-7. Workman examined himself on oath and was cross-examination by employers.
5. The management examined its witness Shri Sumil Goel, Branch Manager on oath, who was cross-examined
by workman. The management also filed payment vouchers, 8 in number, attendance sheet (14 pages), peon
book ( 64 pages). All admitted by workman except attendance sheet marked Exhibit M-1 & M-2
respectively.
6. I have heard argument of Shri Arun Patel, learned counsel for workman and Shri Avinash Dey, Learned
counsel for management and have also gone through the record.
7. From the perusal of record in the light of rival argument, following points for determination arise in the case
in hand-
(1) Whether the termination/dis-engagement of services of workman is justified in law?
(2) If the answer of Ist point is in Negative, whether the workman is entitled to any relief?
8. Point for Determination No.1-
Respective pleadings of the parties on this point have already been detailed earlier. Workman has examined
himself on oath. In his affidavit, he has stated that he was engaged as pen from safai worker on 6-4-2002 &
since then, has been continuously working upto 12-2-13 at Bahmni Banjer Branch of the employer Bank. He
was paid wages regularly through payment vouchers, some of the vouchers have been filed by him. He
further stated that he was assigned work daily including Dak distribution to the Bank’s customers. Copy of
the peon book has been filed by him. He also states that his services were terminated without giving notice or
without assigning any reason from 13-2-2013 by a verbal order which is against law and since then he is not
gainfully employed any where. He has denied that he was called for work only when the Bank required his
services and has stated in his cross-examination that he was regularly kept in engagement and had worked
for 240 days in the year preceding his dis-engagement. Workman has filed and proved peon book (copy)
which is in 7 pages, admitted by employer. It goes to show that he has distributed various mails to various
people/ persons within a period from 5-3-2002 to 16-3-2007 on different dates. Payment vouchers (copy)
total 4 pages, filed by workman admitted by the employers which is Exhibit W-2 goes to show that he has
been paid wages during the period of 7-1-2003 to 1-8-2007 at different dates as casual worker with the Bank.
Workman has further filed and proved an application and certificate dated 7-11-2012, issue by the Bank
certifying that he worked for more than 45 days in the year 2002-03. Employers have admitted these two
documents. This certificate was issued by employers in relation to an application (copy on record), about
which the workman has stated that he had submitted application regarding recruitment w.r.t. vacancies
advertised,which was not forwarded by the Branch to the Regional office. Management’s witness Sumit
Goel, Branch Manager has stated on oath that workman was never an employee of the Bank nor was he
appointed by any officer of the Bank. His averment that he was peon cum safai worker at Bahmni Banjer
Branch from 6-4-2002 to 12-2-2013 is baseless because he was not appointed in the Bank nor was engaged
as daily wager or part time worker with the Branch. It was also stated that since he was not in engagement of
the management Bank therefore he was not directed at any point of time to discharge any duty and there was
no question of completing 240 days in the year preceding his date of alleged dis-engagement hence benefit
of Section 25-F is not available to him regarding not forwarding his application for recruitment regarding
vacancies in the year 2012, the witness states that his candidature was not considered because his application
was not received by the Regional office of the Bank before the last date fixed for filing applications. Also, it
was stated by the witness that since there was no relation of employer and employee, at any point of time
between parties, the provisions of I.D. Act, 1947 are not applicable in the case at hand.
9. In his cross-examination, management witness has stated that the documents (referred to above) filed by the
workman have been admitted by management employers. This witness also admits that no notice or
compensation was given to him before his disengagement. It is strange that the document filed by
management itself rebut the oral statement of management’s witness Exhibit M-1 which is of 8 pages is the
payment voucher regarding payment made to the workman by the Bank. These vouchers are of date 3-1-
2012, 2-3-12, 18-4-12, 1-5-12, 2-6-12, 3-7-12, 4-9-12, 6-10-12. It is specifically mentioned in these vouchers
that these are wages of daily wager workman Vinod Kumar Srivas. Learned counsel for employment submits
that even if it be taken that the workman was paid through these vouchers because he worked with the
2732
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Branch or was engaged with the Branch, these vouchers donot prove him in engagement for 240 days in the
year preceding his date of alleged disengagement. Payment voucher of March 12 establishes that workman
had worked in February 2012 for which payment was made in March and same is the case with other
vouchers. Hence, these 7 payment vouchers establish the case of the workman that he was engaged for 7
months i.e. for 210 days with the Bank. Regarding his engagement for other period, management has itself
filed peon book which is 64 pages marked Exhibit M-2. The peon book(copy) Exhibit M-2- page 27,28 & 29
as well as 30 show that the workman has distributed different mails in the month of May. Similarly peon
book Exhibit M-2 Page 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 & 41 also establish that he has distributed various mails on
different dates to different persons on behalf of Bank.
10. Learned counsel for management has tried to discredit these documents, though filed by the management
itself, with a ground that these documents donot contain full signature of the workman in the column of the
person who has delivered the mail but I am not inclined to accept these argument because in every document
right from statement of claim to statement of oath on other documents, the initials of the workman are same
hence these M-2 document further establish that workman has also worked in the month of May and July for
which, particularly for the month of July, the payment vouchers has been with held by the management.
accordingly the evidence produced by the workman regarding his claim that he completed 240 days
preceding date of his termination appears more reliable than the barred statement of management’s witness,
contradicted by the documents produced by the management itself, that workman was never in engagement at
any time with the Bank. On the basis of above discussion, the fact that workman had completed 240 days in
the year preceding his date of disengagement is held proved. Also the fact that workman has been
engagement of the management Bank since April 2002 as casual worker on whole time basis, discharging the
duties of mail messenger and other duties till date of his disengagement is also held proved.
11. Reference of Section 25-F of ID Act is also necessary which reads as under:-
Section 25-F: Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen.- No workman employed in any industry
who has been in continuous service for not less than one year under an employer shall be retrenched by that
employer until-
(a) the workman has been given one month's notice in writing indicating the reasons for retrenchment and the
period of notice has expired, or the workman has been paid in lieu of such notice, wages for the period of the
notice: 1[***]
(b) the workman has been paid, at the time of retrenchment, compensation which shall be equivalent to
fifteen days' average pay 2[for every completed year of continuous service] or any part thereof in excess of
six months; and
(c) notice in the prescribed manner is served on the appropriate Government 3[or such authority as may be
specified by the appropriate Government by notification in the Official Gazette.”
12. Learned counsel for workman referred to case of Director, Fisheries Terminal Division versus Bhikubhai
Meghajibhai Chavda reported in AIR-2010 SSC-1236. Para-14 & 15 of this judgment requires to be
mentioned here which are being reproduced as under:-
This court in the case of R.M. Yellatty vs. Assistant Executive Engineer [(2006) 1 SCC 106], has observed
“However, applying general principles and on reading the aforesaid judgments, we find that this Court, has
repeatedly taken the view that the burden of proof is on the claimant to show that he had worked for 240 days
in a given year. This burden is discharged only upon the workman stepping up in the witness box. This
burden is discharged upon the workman adducing cogent 9 evidence, both oral and documentary. In cases of
termination of services of daily-waged earners, there will be no letter of appointment of termination. There
will also be no receipt of proof of payment. Thus in most cases, the workman (the claimant) can only call
upon the employer to produce before the Court the nominal muster roll for the given period, the letter of
appointment of termination, if any, the wage register, the attendance register, etc. Drawing of adverse
inference ultimately would depend thereafter on the facts of each case.”
15) Applying the principles laid down in the above case by this court, the evidence produced by the
appellants has not been consistent. The appellants claim that the respondent did not work for 240 days. The
respondent was a workman hired on a daily wage basis. So, it is obvious, as this court pointed out in the
above case that he would have difficulty in having access to all the official documents, muster rolls etc. in
connection with his service. He has come forward and deposed, so in our opinion the burden of proof shifts
to the employer/appellants to prove that he did not complete 240 days of service in the requisite period to
constitute continuous service. It is the contention of the appellant that the services of the respondent were
terminated in 1988. The witness produced by the appellant stated that the respondent stopped coming to work
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2733
from 10 February, 1988. The documentary evidence produced by the appellant is contradictory to this fact as
it shows that the respondent was working during February, 1989 also. It has also been observed by the High
Court that the muster roll for 1986-87 was not completely produced. The appellants have inexplicably failed
to produce the complete records and muster rolls from 1985 to 1991, inspite of the direction issued by the
labor court to produce the same. In fact, there has been practically no challenge to the deposition of the
respondent during cross-examination. In this regard, it would be pertinent to mention the observation of three
judge bench of this court in the case of Municipal Corporation, Faridabad Vs. Siri Niwas [(2004) 8 SCC
195], where it is observed: “A Court of Law even in a case where provisions of the Indian Evidence Act
apply, may presume or may not presume that if a party despite possession of the best evidence had not
produced the same, it would have gone against this contentions. The matter, however, would be different
where despite direction by a court the evidence is withheld.
On the basis of above discussion, it is held that dis-engagement of services of workman Vinod Kumar
Srivas from 12-2-2013 is violative of Section 25-F of ID Act and is untenable in law. Point No.1 is
answered accordingly.
13. Point for determination No.2-
In the light of finding w.r.t. Point No.1, point remains for determination is to what relief, the workman is
entitled? Learned counsel for workman has relied on case law Tapas Kumar Paul versus BSNL and
another reported in 2014(4)-SCR-875 and has submitted that since the retrenchment of the workman has
not been found legal, hence he requires to be reinstated as prayed by him in the facts and circumstances of
the case at hand. The Apex Court has laid down certain guidelines to be considered in substituting an order of
reinstatement by awarding compensation. These are -
“It is no doubt true that a Court may pass an order substituting an order of reinstatement by awarding
compensation but the same has to be based on justifiable grounds viz.
(I)
where the industry is closed;
(II)
where the employee has superannuated or going to retire shortly and no period of service is left to
his credit;
(III)
where the workman has been rendered incapacitated to discharge the duties and cannot be
reinstated and / or
(IV)
when he has lost confidence of the Management to discharge duties. What is sought to be
emphasized is that there may be appropriate case on facts which may justify substituting the order
of reinstatement by award of compensation, but that has to be supported by some legal and
justifiable reasons indicating why the order of reinstatement should be allowed to be substituted by
award of compensation.
The same principles have been laid down in case of Deepali Gundu Surwase versus Kranti Junior
AdhyapakMahavidyalaya and others reported in 2013(1) SCC-324.
14.
In recent case, Civil Appeal no. 124-125 of 2019 decided by Apex Court on 7-1-2019 also
requires to be mentioned in this respect. Para-11 of said judgment is being reproduced as under:-
It is apposite to reproduce what this Court has held in the case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (supra):
“33. It is clear from the reading of the aforesaid judgments that the ordinary principle of grant of
reinstatement with fullback wages, when the termination is found to be illegal is not applied mechanically in
allcases. While that may be a position whereservices of a regular/permanent workman areterminated illegally
and/or mala fide and/or by way of victimization, unfair labor practice, etc. However, when it comes to the
case of termination of a dailywage worker and where the termination is found illegal because of a procedural
defect, namely, in violation of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, this Court is consistent in taking
the view that in such cases reinstatement with back wages is not automatic and instead the workman should
be given monetary compensation which will meet the ends of justice. Rationale for shifting in this direction
is obvious.
34. The reasons for denying the relief ofreinstatement in such cases are obvious. It istrite law that when the
termination is foundto be illegal because of non-payment of retrenchment compensation and notice pay as mandatorily
required under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, even after reinstatement, it is always open to the
management to terminate the services ofthat employee by paying him the retrenchment compensation. Since such a
workman was working on daily wage basis and even after he is reinstated, he has noright to seek regularisation [see
State of Karnataka v. Umadevi (3)17]. Thus when he cannot claim regularisation and he has noright to continue even
2734
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
as a daily wage worker, no useful purpose is going to beserved in reinstating such a workman and hecan be given
monetary compensation by theCourt itself inasmuch as if he is terminatedagain after reinstatement, he would receive
monetary compensation only in the form ofretrenchment compensation and notice pay.
In such a situation, giving the relief ofreinstatement, that too after a long gap, would not serve any purpose.
“35. We would, however, like to add a caveathere. There may be cases where terminationof a daily wage
worker is found to be illegalon the ground that it was resorted to asunfair labor practice or in
violation
of the principle of last come first go viz. whileretrenching such a worker daily wage juniorsto him were
retained. There may also be asituation that persons junior to him wereregularised under some policy but
theworkman concerned terminated. In suchcircumstances, the terminated worker shouldnot be denied
reinstatement unless there aresome other weighty reasons
for
adopting
thecourse
of
grant
of
compensation instead ofreinstatement. In such cases, reinstatementshould be the rule and only in
exceptionalcases for the reasons stated to be in writing,such a relief can be denied.”
Now considering the claim of reinstatement of the workman in the light of principles of law laid down in the
referred cases from the evidence on record, it is proved that the workman has been in engagement of the
management Bank since April 2002. He has specifically stated on oath that he has not been in gainful
engagement since after the date of his disengagement and there is no rebuttal by employers. This is
established that he has passed the period of his life in which he could be eligible or could apply for any other
employment as he has crossed that age during his this engagement also that he has not reached the age of
superannuation or has not been incapacitated by any intervening disability to continue in engagement. In
these circumstances, it is just and proper and in the ends of justice if he is reinstated on the position as it was
on the date of his disengagement but with 50 % backwages from the date of his disengagement till date of
reinstatement.Accordingly, the workman is held entitled to be reinstated on the position as it was on the
date of his disengagement but with 50 % back wages and all consequential benefits from the date of his
disengagement till date of reinstatement.
Point No.2 is decided accordingly.
In the result, award is passed as under:-
(1) The action of the management of the Central Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri
Vinod Kumar Srivas is not legal and justified.
(2) The management of Central Bank of India is directed to reinstate workman Vinod Kumar Srivas
on the position as it was on the date of his disengagement but with 50 % backwages from the date
of his disengagementwith all consequential benefits till date of reinstatement.
Amount as per above order shall be paid to workman within 30 days from the date of notification of award.
In case of default, amount shall carry 9% interest per annum from the date of award till its realization.
Dated : 3-4-2019
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 670-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
esllZ cSad vkWQ cMkSnk ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn
esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] u- 1] ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 94@2014½ dks izdkf'kr
djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26@04@-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&39025@01@2019&vkbZvkj ¼ch-II½]
lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2735
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 670.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 94/2014) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, No. 1, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Bank of
Baroda and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 26/04/2019.
[No. L-39025/01/2019-IR(B-II)]
SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
IN THE COURT OF SHRI AVTAR CHAND DOGRA PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL
GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT No.1, DWARKA COURTS
COMPLEX : NEW DELHI
ID No. 94/2014
Smt. Kamla Devi w/o. Shri Makhan Lal
Through Delhi Karamchari Union (Regd.)
52-C, Okha Estate Phase-3,
New Delhi 110020.
r/o. 8/3 G-Block, Sangam Vihar,
New Delhi 110062.
…Workman/Claimant
Versus
The Branch Manager
Bank of Baroda,
L-43, Kalkaji,
New Delhi 110019.
…Management
AWARD
This Award shall decided a claim petition directly filed by the claimant under Section 2-A of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (in short “the Act”) with the averments that the claimant Smt. Kamla Devi had been working as
Safai Karamchari since January, 2011 with Management Bank at its Kalkajit Branch and her drawn wages were
Rs.6000/- per month. She always worked with honesty and dedication but the Management took advantage of her
illiteracy. She was neither given any appointment letter, nor minimum wages and over time, casual leave etc., though
the claimant made demand for the same. The Management terminated the services of the claimant on 3/10/2013
without any notice, warning or charge sheet and in violation of the provisions of Section 25-F and 25-G of the Act. It
is pleaded that the Management used to get signatures of the claimant on blank vouchers and plain papers which the
claimant had done under pressure as the Management used to extend threat of terminating her services time and again.
The Management even did not pay to her earned wages for the months of August, September and October, 2013. A
demand notice dated 7/10/2013 was sent to the Management but to no response. The claimant thereafter approached
the Conciliation Officer but to no avail . The workman/claimant is unemployed since the day of termination of her
services by the Management, though she made efforts to find a job.
2.
The claim petition has been resisted by the Management who filed its written statement and took preliminary
objections inter-alia that there is no employer-employee relationship between the claimant and the Management, as
the claimant never worked with the Management since its opening in the year 2012. It is alleged that claim of the
claimant to the effect that she started working at Kalkaji Branch of the Bank since January, 2011, is false inasmuch as
Kalkaji Branch of the Bank was opened (soft launch) only on 31/3/2012 and was formally inaugurated only on
22/9/2012, because premises on Ground Floor, L-43 Kalkaji was taken on lease w.e.f. 1/4/2012 and permission was
obtained from South MCD vide letter dated 8/8/2012. All other averments made by the claimant regarding obtaining
her signatures on blank vouchers/papers and/or payment of less wages have been totally denied by the Management.
3)
The claimant/workman filed rejoinder wherein she denied all the allegations made by the Management and
reiterated her own case as set up in the claim petition.
4)
On the pleadings of the parties, this Tribunal vide order dated 28/04/2016 framed following issues :-
(i) Whether termination of the workman with effect from 3/10/2013 is arbitrary and illegal and the workman
is liable to be reinstated as alleged ?
(ii) Whether Kalkaji branch of the Management was opened on 31/3/2012 ? If so, its effect ?
2736
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(iii) Whether the workman has never worked in Kalkaji Branch, as alleged and as such there was no
relationship of employer-employee between the parties ?
6) The Claimant in support of her case examined herself as W.W.1 and tendered her affidavit Ex.WW1/A
alongwith documents Ex.WW1/1 to WW1/3.
7)
On the other hand, the Management in order to rebut the case of the claimant examined Shri Aditya Ravi,
Chief Manager of Management who tendered his evidence by way of affidavit Ex.MW1/A and relied on documents
Ex.MW1/1 to Ex.MW1/3.
8)
I have carefully gone through the evidence adduced on record by both the parties and have give my
thoughtful consideration to rival contentions of Shri B.S.Rawat, A./R for the claimant and Shri B.S.Chauhan, A/R for
the Management. My findings on above issues are as follows.
Issue No.2 :-
9.
Onus to prove this issue was upon the Management, inasmuch as it was alleged by the Management that
claim of the claimant that she had started working with the Management Bank from January, 2011 is incorrect because
Kalkaji Branch of the Bank was opened (soft launch) only on 31/3/2012 and was formally inaugurated only on
22/9/2012, because premises on Ground Floor, L-43 Kalkaji was taken on lease w.e.f. 1/4/2012 and permission was
obtained from South MCD vide letter dated 8/8/2012. To prove its case, the Management examined MW1- Mr.Aditya
Ravi who has filed on record copy of the lease deed in respect of premises where Kalkaji Branch was opened viz.
ground floor of L-43 Kalkaji New Delhi as Ex.MW1/1, which goes to show that premises in question was leased to
the Management Bank w.e.f.1/4/2012 for a term of 10 years. MW 2 Ankit Palta, another witness of the Management
has filed on record copy of the letter dated 15/3/2012 of Reserve Bank of India as Ex.MW2/3 which shows that MICR
code in respect of Kalkaji Branch was allotted to the Management Bank by the Reserve Bank of India. No contrary
thereto has been adduced by the claimant. The aforesaid documents substantiate the plea of the Management that
Kalkji Branch was opened (soft lunched) on 31/3/2012. Consequently, the plea of the claimant that she had started
working with the Management from January, 2011 is not acceptable. This issue is decided accordingly in favour of
the Management.
Issue No. 3 :-
10.
Ld. A/R appearing on behalf of the Management strongly contended that there is no relationship of employer
and employee between the Management & claimant as she never worked with the Management what to talk from
January,2011. It was also contended that onus is also upon the claimant to prove that she was in the employment of
the Management Bank and has completed more than 240 days in a calendar year.
10)
Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Claimant submitted during the course of arguments
that the claimant was working as Part Time Sweeper with the Management Bank since 2012 though claimant due to
illiteracy and ignorance of exact date, averred in the claim petition that she was engaged in January, 2011. It was also
submitted that services of the claimant were illegally terminated on 3/10/2013.
12-
There is no dispute about preposition of law that onus to prove that claimant was in the employment of
Management is always on the workman/claimant and it is for the workman to adduce evidence to prove factum of her
employment with the Management Bank. Such evidence may be in form of receipt of salary or wages for 240 days or
record of his/her appointment or engagement for that year to show that he/she has worked with the employer for 240
days or more in a Calendar year. In this regard, reference may be made to Batala Coop. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs.
Sowaran Singh, (2005) 8 Supreme Court Cases 481 as well as Director Fisheries Terminated Division Vs. Bhikubhai
Meghajibhai Gavda (2012) 1 SCC 47.
12-
This Tribunal has to consider the oral as well as documentary evidence adduced on record so as to decide the
question of relationship of employer and employee between the Management and the claimant herein. In this respect,
it is appropriate to refer to the affidavit ExWW1/A of the claimant. It is clear from the perusal of the affidavit
Ex.WW1/A that it is in consonance with the pleadings i.e. statement of claim filed by the claimant. It is the specific
case of the Management that the claimant never worked with the Management at any point of time. MW1 Aditya
Ravi clarified in his cross examination that he had taken charge of the post of Branch Manager of Kalkaji Branch
(which was a new branch) on 1st May, 2012 and at that time there was no official/Safai Karamchari at the said branch.
He volunteered that cleaning (of bank premises) was taken care of by the landlord. Thereafter Shri Neeru was posted
by the competent authority to clean the branch. He admitted that he has not filed on record any document to show that
Shri Neeru was engaged as sub-staff (for cleaning the bank premises). He also admitted that vouchers Ex.MW1/W-1
to Ex.MW1/W-19 bear his signatures and tried to explain that payment shown in those vouchers are with respect to
cleaning of fans, computers, Air conditioners, telephones, FAX machines including sweeping etc., However, a careful
perusal of these vouchers (Ex.MW1/W-1 to Ex.MW1/W-9) shows that these have been drawn for “sundry charges”
regarding payment made towards sweeping of the bank premises. First voucher Ex.MW1/W-1 (dated 30/6/2012) is
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2737
towards payment of Rs.1600/- made to Kamla; second voucher Ex.MW1/W-2 (dated 1/8/2012) is towards payment of
Rs.1600/- made to Kamlesh; third voucher Ex.MW1/W-2 (dated 1/9/2012) is towards payment of Rs.1600/- made to
Maya; Similarly are the other vouchers showing payment of sweeping charges made to different persons named as
Sarabjit, Manju Devi, Geeta Devi, Kamni, Anita, Gaya Lal, Mohan, Jai Kishan, Gopal, Jogi, Raju, Mr. Mohan,
Geeta, Raju, Jogi, Raju and last voucher dated 17/12/13 for Rs.900/- is in the name of Gopi. The plea of the
Management that the claimant never worked with it any any point of time is belied from the document/payment
voucher Ex.MW1/W-1 which payment has been made in favour of the claimant Smt.Kamla. It is common
knowledge that the payment through vouchers is made by the Banks to the workers engaged on part time basis
including Part Time Sweeper for sweeping and dusting the bank premises and further that, the Branch Manager
concerned has been given powers to engage such workers.
13-
It is a matter of record that an application under Section 11(3)(b) of the Act filed on behalf of the claimant
was partly allowed by this Tribunal and Management Bank was directed to produce certain documents vis-à-vis Name
of the Safai Karamchari/Chowkidar alongwith wage slip, mode of payment etc. The Management failed to produce
the said documents excepting the payment vouchers and as such, adverse inference is required to be drawn against the
Management for non production of such documents. It is very astonishing that payment towards sweeping charges has
been debited by the Management Bank through monthly vouchers but in different names. The Management Bank has
neither explained as to why vouchers have been issued in different names, nor has filed details of such Part Time
Sweepers engaged by it. It appears that same has been done just to deprive the claimant to seek other facilities. In
the circumstances, I find force in the submission of the claimant that she always worked with honesty and dedication
but the Management took advantage of her illiteracy and did not issue her any appointment letter. I am of the opinion
that the there existed relationship of employer-employee between the Management and claimant herein and that the
claimant worked with the Management at least w.e.f. 30/6/2012 till 30/9/2013 and that her services were terminated
by the Management on 3/10/2013. Consequently, this Tribunal has no hesitation to hold that the claimant is a
“workman” within the definition of Section 2(S) of the Act even if she was engaged on part time basis. In this regard,
reference can be made to the decision in the case of Devinder Singh Vs. Municipal Council, Sanaur, AIR 2011
Supreme Court 2532, wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court while interpreting the provisions of Section 2(S) of the Act
which deals with the definition of “workman” has observed as under :-
“The source of employment, the quantum of recruitment, the terms & conditions of employment/ contract of
service, the quantum of wages/ pay and mode of payment are not at all relevant for deciding whether or not a
person is a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Act. The definition of workman also does not
make any distinction between full time and part time employee or a person appointed on contract basis.
There is nothing in the plain language of Section 2(s) from which it can be inferred that only person
employed on regular basis or a person employed for doing whole time job is a workman and the one
employed on temporary, part time or contract basis on fixed wages or as a casual employee or for doing duty
for fixed hours is not a workman.
It is clear from the perusal of aforesaid observations that even if a person is engaged on temporary, part time or
contract basis or for doing any other kind of work and is duly paid wages for the said work, in that eventuality such a
person would be covered by the definition of “workman” as provided in Section 2(S) of the Act.
14.
Having regard to the overall facts and circumstances of the case, it is held that there existed relationship of
employer-employee between the Management and claimant herein. This issue is accordingly decided in favour of the
claimant and against the Management.
Issue No.1 :-
15-
The vital question for consideration is as to whether termination of the claimant is illegal and against the
provisions of the Act. Testimony of the claimant that the Management terminated her services on 3/10/2013 without
any notice, warning or charge sheet and in violation of the provisions of Section 25-F and 25-G of the Act, has gone
unassailed and unchallenged, inasmuch as the case of the Management was that the claimant was never
employed/engaged by it. However, this Tribunal while deciding issue No.3 has already held that there existed
relationship of employer-employee between the Management and the claimant and further that, claimant worked with
the Management at least w.e.f. 30/6/2012 till the date of her termination on 3/10/2013. Admittedly, the Management
bank has not issued any notice to the claimant before ordering her termination, nor has paid one month’s salary in lieu
of such notice as required under Section 25-F of the Act. I may mention that provisions of Section 25-F of the Act
which provides for conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen, are absolute and inexorable and it reads
as under :-
“25-F : Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen –
No workman employed in any industry who has been in continuous service for not less than one year under
an employer shall be retrenched by that employer until –
2738
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(a) The workman has been given one month’s notice in writing indicating the reasons for retrenchment and
the period of notice has expired, or the workman has been paid in lieu of such notice, wages for the
period of the notice;
(b) The workman has been paid, at the time of retrenchment, compensation which shall be equivalent to
fifteen days’ average pay for every completed years of continuous service or any part thereof in excess
of six months; and
(c) Notice in the prescribed manner is served on the appropriate Government or such authority as may be
specified by the appropriate Government by notification in the Official Gazette.”
The above provision makes it clear that the employer is required to give notice to the appropriate
Government apart-from giving one month’s notice in writing or one month’s wages in lieu of the notice and payment
of retrenchment compensation to the concerned workman.
There is long line of decisions of Hon’ble Apex Court as well as of various High Courts that provisions of Section 25-
F of the Act are mandatory in nature and termination of the workman from services in derogation of the provisions of
Section 25-F of the Act will render whole action of the Management Bank to be illegal and wrong under the law. As
such, it is held that action of the Management in terminating/disengaging the services of the claimant herein was
unjustified and illegal.
16)
Now the residual question arises for consideration is whether the claimant/work is entitled to any incidental
relief of payment of back wages and/or reinstatement of service with full back wages. There is pleading in the claim
petition as well as evidence to the effect that the workman is unemployed since the day of her termination and has got
no source of her livelihood.. The Management has not adduced any evidence to show that the claimant is gainfully
employed somewhere else or that she is in a position to make her both ends meet by doing any work. Even if it is
assumed that the claimant is doing some intermittent or ad-hoc work to make her both ends meet, that would not itself
amount to gainful employment. But at the same time this Tribunal can not ignore the fact that there is no positive
evidence on record to prove that the claimant was regular employee of the Management bank or that she had applied
for the post pursuant to the advertisement issued by the Bank or that her name was sponsored by the Employment
Exchange. Latest trend itself discernable from the various pronouncements made by the Hon’ble Apex Court is that
when a person has been engaged on daily wage basis or for doing temporary kinds of work, in that situation full back
wages are not be awarded. There are number of factors which are required to be considered by the Tribunal while
considering the question of reinstatement with back wages. It has been held in the case of Hari Nandan Prasad Vs.
Food Corporation of India (2014) 7 Supreme Court cases 190 as under :-
“ Relief by way of reinstatement with back wages is not automatic and may be wholly inappropriate
in a given fact situation even though the termination of an employee is in contravention of the
prescribed procedure. Compensation instead of reinstatement has been held to meet the ends of
justice. An order of retrenchment passed in violation of Section 25-F although may be set aside but
an award of reinstatement should not, however, automatically passed. The award of reinstatement
with full back wages in a case where the workman has completed 240 days of work in a year
preceding the date of termination, particularly daily wages has not been found to be proper by the
Supreme Court and instead compensation has been awarded. The Supreme Court has distinguished
between a daily wager who does not hold a post and a permanent employee. The reasons for
denying the relief of reinstatement in such cases are obvious. It is trite law that when the
termination is found to be illegal, because of non payment of retrenchment compensation and notice
pay as mandatorily required under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, even after
reinstatement, it is always open to the management to terminate the services of that employee by
paying him the retrenchment compensation.
17) Having regard to the recent judicial trends and duration of service rendered by the claimant, an amount of Rs.1
lakh (Rupees One Lakh) appears to be just and reasonable, and the same is payable to the claimant herein by the
Management. In case this compensation amount is not paid within one month from the date of publication of this
Award, then the claimant will be entitled to recover the same alongwith interest @ 6% per annum from the date of
filing the claim petition till realization of the amount.
Award is passed accordingly.
Date : 2/4/2019
AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, Presiding Officer
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2739
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 671-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ
eSlwj feujYl fyfeVsM izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;
ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] csaxywj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 96@2007½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj
dks 23@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&29012@22@2007&vkbZvkj¼,e½]
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 671 .—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 96/2007) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Bangalore now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Mysre Minerals
Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 23.4.2019.
[No. L-29012/22/2007-IR(M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIUBNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT
BANGALORE
DATED : 10TH APRIL 2019
PRESENT : Justice Smt. Rathnakala, Presiding Officer
C.R No. 96/2007
Advocate for I Party : Advocate for II Party:
Mr. K.T. Govinde Gowda Mr. L. Venkatarama Reddy
AWARD
The Central Government vide Order No.L-29012/22/2007-IR(M) dated 21.08.2007 in exercise of the powers
conferred by Clause (d) of Sub-Section (1) and Sub-Section2(A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute act, 1947 (for
brevity ‘the Act’ hereafter) referred the following Industrial Dispute for adjudication.
“Whether the management of Mysore Minerals Limited is justified in terminating the services/
premature superannuating of the services of Smt. Shirumaniyamma w.e.f. 28.06.1998? If not, to what
relief the workman is entitled to?”
1.
The claim brought before this Tribunal by the 1st party is :—
She joined the service of the 2nd Party Management on 12.08.19977 at its Mining Unit viz., Byrapura Chromite Mines,
Channarayapatna Taluk, Hassan District, as a Mining Worker under token No. 203. At the time of joining service she
furnished her age as 30 years, her Date of Birth being 12.08.1947 as per the Horoscope, her age was accepted without
Certificate of Registration of Birth, in all the statutory records like EPF, B-Register, Service Record same age is
registered, she was entitled to continue in the service of the 2nd Party up to 12.08.2005. The 2nd Party conducted
Medical Examination illegally and removed her from service; she was orally refused employment w.e.f 28.06.1998 by
assigning reason that, she has passed 58 years. Some of the Co-worker who were similarly removed from service
approached the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka and by the order of the Hon’ble High Court the Management
reinstated the pre-matured retired employees. At that point of time about 100 Mining workers were removed from
service on Medical ground. They have not changed her Date of Birth in the Official records, 3 months notice was not
issued to her neither 3 months salary was paid to her. The 2nd Party acted contrary to its own Certified Standing Order.
Hence, the prayer for reinstatement with continuity of service and with full back wages.
I Party
II Party
Smt. Shirumaniyamma,
W/o Late Munuswamy,
Valagerehalli Village & Post,
Bagur Hobli,
Channarayapatna Taluk
HASSAN DIST.
Karnataka.
The Managing Director,
Mysore Minerals Limited,
No. 39, M.G. Road,
Bangalore – 560001.
2740
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2.
The claim allegation is countered by the Management succinctly stating that, the dispute filed after 10 years
from the date of termination of service is time barred, she was given 30 days time to prefer appeal before the Appellate
Medical Board as per rules, she did not avail the opportunity, she waited for the result of the case filed by the Co-
workers who had approached the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka. The success of W.P. No. 5615/2001 and
26101/2001 before the Hon’ble High Court Karnataka inspired her to file this dispute after lapse of 10 years.
3.
Further, it is stated that the 2nd Party arranged for Medical Examination for all employees and workers during
the year 1997-98 as required under Mines Rules 1995, which is a requirement under law. A team of qualified and senior
Medical Officers from Hutti Gold Mines Co. Ltd., were specifically entrusted to carry out Medical Examination; the 1st
Party was found incapacitated to work in Mine, since she was 58 year on the date of Medical Examination. Hence, the
2nd Party decided to terminate her service; without filling appeal she opted to receive monetary benefits arising from the
termination. She has received the terminal benefit without any protest, now she has no right to raise the dispute. There
is no relationship of employer and employee between the parties. Hence, the reference is not maintainable and this
Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the reference.
4.
After completion of the pleadings, both parties have adduced their evidence.
5.
The Management adduced evidence through its Assistant Manager, he produced photo copy of the B-Register
maintained by the 2nd Party, according to which her Date of Birth is 12.08.1947. During his cross-examination the
documents confronted to him from the 1st Party were identified and marked as Ex W-1 to Ex W-6; Ex W-1 is the
Medical Report in Form ‘O’; as per the same she is declared medically unfit due to overage, Ex W-3 is the order passed
in a W.P filed by the similarly placed workmen whereby the Hon’ble High Court ordered the Authorities not to change
the Date of Birth of the petitioner in the Service Register without adopting the procedure known under the law; Ex W-5
is another W.P by similarly placed workmen whereby the order passed by the Respondent was quashed and Ex W-6 is
the Office Order extending the superannuation of its employees from 58 to 60 years.
6.
Further, MW-1 admits that, the 1st Party workman was treated as daily wager and they have not provided
working conditions as per the Mining Act. In his affidavit evidence he had averred that, as per the request made by the
employees union the 2nd Party conducted the medical examination through qualified senior Medical Officer but, during
cross examination he stated that, Tri-partite Settlement was made in the year 1998, it was between the Management,
Mysore Minerals Employees Association and Director of Mines Safety; he experienced ignorance to the question that
Mysore Minerals Employees Association represents only Clerical Staff.
7.
It was further admitted by MW-1 that, despite having technical persons and machinery, in the year 1995 – 1996
2nd Party entrusted its work to Private Party and the Company suffered loss of about 21 Crores in Shimoga and Hassan
District; having suffered loss the management thought of reducing the number of workers and at that juncture
management ordered for Medical Examination of all the Mining Workers. It is further brought forth in his evidence that
as per the Certified Standing Order of the 2nd Party Clause 18 and 24 any termination has to be followed by enquiry
along with 3 months notice pay, but they had not paid 3 months salary to her; he also admits that as per Clause 18.3 of
CDPR Rules change in the Date of Birth as entered in the company Records can only be effected on the Judgment of a
Competent Court otherwise the Date of Birth once recorded will not be changed, he also admits that, the termination
order was not attached with the copy of the Medical Certificate. Further, he admits that before removing 500 employees
on the basis of medical ground, permission was not taken from the Central Government under Industrial Dispute Act.
No steps were taken by the Company to obtain the permission from the Labour Ministry or Labour Secretary; he also
admits that, 1st Party is a illiterate person and he was not furnished with Kannada version/translation of Medical Report.
8.
The 1st Party/WW-1 during the cross-examination admitted that, she raised the dispute after the W.P filed by a
co-worker was allowed and he was reinstated by the 2nd Party as per the order of the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka.
9.
By now it is clear that, for changing the Date of Birth of the 1st Party workman 2nd Party did not have either an
order from the Competent Court of a Scientific Report of her age to disqualify her has unfit. Only ailment mentioned in
Medical Certificate in Form-O is ‘overage’; the mode adopted by them to remove other similarly placed workman is
thwarted by the Hon’ble High Court and those persons were reinstated to their original post. Due to her termination on
the ground of medical unfitness 1st Party workman lost 7 years of service. Though it is said that, she could have fought
against the management before the Appellate Authority, one shall be reminded that, she is an illiterate, manual worker
and the Medical Certificate issued to her was in English Language, and it is highly possible that she was unaware of
niceties of law. Another drawback in the case of the 2nd Party is at that point of time they had removed 500 workers
without obtaining permission by the Appropriate Government of the Chapter V-A of the Act, specifically in violation of
sections 25F, G, H and N 2 of the Act. As admitted by the workman, she has raised the Industrial Dispute after her
colleagues won the battle against the management before the Hon’ble High Court. However, it is the settled position of
law that Articled 137 of the Schedule of Limitation Act is not applicable to the Industrial Dispute Act for raising the
dispute.
10.
Now the question is the relief that, the 1st Party is entitled to get. She has crossed the age of superannuation
long back; she has raised the dispute after a delay of 6 years. Keeping a holistic view of the matter, in my considered
opinion a lump sum compensation would equalise the situation; arithmetical calculation of the retrenchment calculated
in accordance with Section 25-F(b) 1 month notice pay + retrenchment compensation i.e., 15 days average pay for every
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2741
completed year of continuous service or any part thereon, in case of 6 months will not condone the illegality committed
by the 2nd Party. Having regard to the length of time spent the expense incurred by her in prosecuting the case, I am of
the view that a lump sum compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- would be appropriated relief for her. Hence, the following
AWARD
The reference is accepted. 2nd Party is directed to pay compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- to the 1st Party
workman within 60 days from today otherwise the amount shall carry future interest of 8% per annum.
(Dictated, corrected and signed by me on 10st April, 2019)
JUSTICE SMT. RATHNAKALA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 672-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ
dqæseq[k vk;ju vksj dEiuh fyfeVsM izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] csaxywj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 15@2009½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS
tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&26011@5@2008&vkbZvkj¼,e½]
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 672.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 15/2009) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Bangalore now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Employers in relation to the
management of M/s Kudremukh Iorn Cmpany Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central
Government on 23.4.2019.
[No. L-26011/5/2008-IR(M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIUBNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT
DATED
:
1st APRIL 2019
PRESENT
:
JUSTICE SMT. RATHNAKALA, Presiding Officer
C R No.15/2009
I Party
II Party
The General Secretary,
Karnataka Coffee Curing & General Workers
Union,
AITUC Tamil Colony,
CHICKMAGALUR.
The General Manager,
Kudremukh Iron Ore Company Limited,
Kudremukh,
CHICKMAGALUR.
Appearances
I Party :
Shri Muralidhara, Advocate
II Party :
Smt. K Subha Ananthi, Advocate
1.
The Central Government vide order No.L-26011/5/2008-IR(M) dated 04.03.2009 in exercise of the power
conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(hereinafter referred as “The Act”) (14 of 1947) made this reference for adjudication of the following Industrial Dispute:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of M/s. Allied Construction Company in denying bonus to their
workers for the year 2003 – 2004 is justified? If not, to what relief these workers are entitled to? Whether the
management of Kudremukh Iron ore Company Limited, Kudremukh, as a Principal Employer, is responsible to
pay bonus for the year 2003 – 2004 to the contract workers employed by its contractor M/s Allied Construction
Company in the event of failure on the part of the said contractor to pay bonus for the said period to these
workers? If so, to what relief the workers are entitled?”
2742
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2.
The claim set forth by the 1stParty is, the 2ndParty management is the Principle Employer and they worked
under the Contractor; the contractor has employed 75 workers for the works to carry out by the Principle Employer. The
workers continued to work under different contractors. During 2000 – 2001 they were working under Alpha Tech
Nirman Private Limited, who replaced the earlier contractor; without break the workmen have continued to work; they
are entitled for bonus for the year 2003 – 2004; they are paid bonus for the financial years 1998 - 1999, 1999 – 2000, the
earlier contractor used to pay bonus in the form of exgratia, adhoc amount etc., they have worked continuously for the
year 2003 – 2004, hence, entitled for bonus for the said period. II Party earned profit for the year 2003 – 2004. Thus,
they are entitled for maximum bonus, they are denied statutory bonus of 8.33 %. The Principle Employer is responsible
to ensure payment of statutory bonus but it has failed to comply its legal obligations. Hence, prayer for a direction to
the 2nd Party to pay @ 20 % Bonus to the workman employed by them for the financial year 2003 – 2004 with a further
direction to Principle Employer to pay the said amount.
3.
2nd Party contested the claim; they have stated that it is not responsible for payment of bonus or any benefit. As
per the work order in favour of II party, they were obliged to abide by the terms of the Contract Labour (R&A) act,
Minimum Wages Act, Workmen’s Compensation Act, PF Act, Mines act.
4.
The contractor engaged few casual workers to carry out certain jobs on temporary basis for a specified period.
2nd Party ensured Minimum Wages, PF contribution, safety applications etc., which they did. The dispute is raised after a
lapse of 5 to 6 years. The workers having settled all their dues have now raised this dispute for bonus which is purely
between them and the contractor.
5.
To substantiate their contention 2nd Party placed on record, the evidence of its Assistant Manager (Personnel)
along with the documents Work Order, Contractors Licence, the Renewal Licence, its Registration Certificate (Ex M-1
to Ex M-4). During the cross-examination the witness admits that 2nd Party did not verify whether the contractor paid
the bonus for the workers for the period 2003 -2004.
6.
The 1st party who all along prosecuted the case has opted not to adduce rebuttal evidence Ex M-1/the work
order does not incorporate in itself such burden on the II Party to payment of bonus to the workman; it is not the
statutory bonus of 8.33% which the 1st Party are claiming. Their claim is 20% in respect of the year 2003- 2004.The
dispute is raised in the year 2009; they have no grievance in respect of any legal dues from the contractor; at this point
of time where they have severed relationship by accepting their dues from their employer, there is no justification to
pass on the burden on the Principle Employer for the payment of bonus. Security Amount / Bank guarantee which the
employer will be holding against the contractor will not operate after cessation of their contractual relationship. In that
view of the matter, there is no justification on behalf of the II Party No. 2 in denying bonus for the year 2003 – 2004.
Hence,
AWARD
Reference is Rejected
(Dictated to U D C, transcribed by him, corrected and signed by me on 1st April 2019)
JUSTICE SMT. RATHNAKALA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 673-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ
dqæseq[k vk;ju vksj dEiuh fyfeVsM izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] csaxywj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 45@2009½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS
tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&26011@3@2007&vkbZvkj¼,e½]
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 673.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 45/2009) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Bangalore now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to management of
M/s Kudremukh Iorn Cmpany Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on
23.4.2019.
[No. L-26011/3/2007-IR(M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2743
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIUBNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT
DATED
:
1st APRIL 2019
PRESENT :
JUSTICE SMT. RATHNAKALA, Presiding Officer
C R No.45/2009
I Party
II Party
The General Secretary,
Karnataka Coffee Curing & General Workers Union,
AITUC Tamil Colony,
CHICKMAGALUR.
The General Manager,
Kudremukh Iron Ore Company Limited, Kudremukh,
CHICKMAGALUR.
Appearances
I Party :
Shri Muralidhara, Advocate
II Party :
Smt. K Subha Ananthi, Advocate
AWARD
1.
The Central Government vide order No. L-26011/3/2007-IR(M) dated 10.09.2009 in exercise of the power
conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(hereinafter referred as “The Act”) (14 of 1947) made this reference for adjudication with the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Kudremukh Iron Ore Co. Ltd. in not regularizing the services of 24
workers mentioned in the list enclosed is legal and correct? To what relief they are entitled to and from which
date?”
2.
The claim of the I Party Union is that the I Party Union represents the workman employed in the Coffee Curing
establishments and other general service industries. The workman employed in various canteens run and maintained by
II Party is its members. 2nd party is engaged in Mining and Processing Iron Ore and has legal obligation to run and
maintain industrial canteen for the benefit of it’s employees. It runs a canteen in Crush and Concentrator Department
through a committee constituted for this purpose and subsidises the business day today affairs like deciding menu
hygiene etc is handled by the canteen committee. It has given rent free accommodation, free electricity, water, gas and
other items to run the canteen, furniture, utensils and other equipment is also provided; wages are paid directly by the II
party to the employees of the canteen. The workman serving in the canteen are not paid wages as per standard wages.
Their service is exploited. The administrative control appointment, promotions, disciplinary jurisdiction over the
canteen is exercised by the II Party. All these years the workers had legitimate expectation that they will be absorbed in
the service of the company, the II party when requested did not accept to regularise their service. Hence, the claim for
direction to the II party to absorb them in the service of the II Party w.e.f. the date of joining the service etc.
3.
The claim is countered by 2nd Party. It is stated that the 1st Party union is an outsider, not recognized by the 2nd
Party and it has no locus standi to raise the dispute. All the I Party employees are the employees of the contractor H S
Hiryanna and the 2ndParty is the Principal Employer. The contract with H S Hiryanna will end by 31.07.2010. The
contractor has been awarded contract by following the due procedure. The contractor is a necessary party to this
dispute. Hiriyanna is a licenced contractor. His contract is extended from 01.02.20019 for another 11 months. The
Senior Manager (P L E) has issued a letter dated 14.07.2008 that contract will end by 30.06.2010 and he has to return
the properties of the company. There are no sanctioned posts as far as Crush and Concentrator Department is
concerned. There is no question of regularisation of the erst while contract employees. They do not intend to continue
the contract of any contractor w.e.f. 01.08.2010.Now the mining is closed as per the direction of Hon’ble Supreme
Court. Strength of employees is decreased from 2200 to 415, they do not require additional canteen.
4.
It is further stated, that the canteen workers are engaged by the contractor not by the II Party. The contract was
awarded based on the tender process. Wages to the workers is paid by contractor. Management of the II party has no
control over the canteen workers regarding engagement, supervision and control. A canteen management committee
consisting of management representative and workers representative oversees functioning of the area, quality of food,
cleanliness and hygine, etc., rent free accommodation and other facilities are provided as per the terms of the contract,
for the welfare of the employees. There is no Master and Servant relationship between the II Party and the workers. The
management ensures payment of minimum wages, PF Recovery and workman compensation by the contractor. The
claim is not justified.
5.
On completion of the pleadings to discharge the burden of proving the issue the management examined two
witnesses and rebuttal evidence is not adduced. Both have submitted their arguments.
6.
The first witness examined by the II Party was the Senior Manager (Personal) / MW1 the second witness was
the Deputy Manager (HR) / MW 2. MW 1 produced the documents Ex M-1 to Ex M-8 pertaining to the contract
awarded to Hiriyanna and extension of tenure of vide letter dated 14.07.2010/Ex M-8 of the Senior Manager. Hiriyanna
is informed about the closure of period of contract on 13.07.2018 with a direction to handover the properties belonging
2744
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
to the company. During his cross-examination the 1stParty confronted certain documents which the witness admitted.
They are the Annual Subscription to the provident fund scheme pertaining to three workers in the name of the II Party
(Ex W-1), One PF Slip pertains to H S Hiryanna (Ex W-1(a)); wage registers with the name of H S Hiriyanna as one of
the worker (Ex W-2); three wage slips under the name of the establishment H S Hiryanna (Ex W-4).
7.
MW 2 brought on record that the closure procedure is on and the possession of the mines has to be handed over
to the officer designated by the ministry. Many of the regular employees were transferred to other places and others
have opted for VRS. For the benefit of continuing employees canteen facility is continued. He produced the Original
Work Order issued to the contractor during February 2009 and also subsequent extension of contract, the licence
obtained by the contractor under Contract Labour Regulation & Abolition Act is also produced. During his further
course of examination in chief he placed on record the mining operation is stopped w.e.f. 01.01.2006 vide orders of the
apex court dated 30.10.2002 in I A 670/2001 in WP(C) No. 202/1995 and dated 12.05.2006 in I A 1150/2003, IA no.
1010/2003 in WP (C) No. 202/1995 the mine is taken over by Sh. B Ram Mohan, Regional Controller of Mines, Indian
Bureau of Mines, Ministry of Mines, on 03.04.2014. Kudremukh Mining and Beneficiation Equipments are sold to
Annam Steels Private Limited as per sale contract dated 12.12.2012 and they are dismantling the equipment’s, the
supporting documents are Ex M-13 and Ex M-14.
8.
During the cross-examination it was brought forth that now the earlier casual workers are employed to work in
the canteen on contract basis. It was also suggested because of the management concerned 24 workmen were not listed
in the voters list by the Union, which the witness denied.
9.
Despite the strong case set up by the 2nd Party that 1stParty are employed under H S Hiriyanna who is a licenced
contractor, 1st Party have opted not to adduced rebuttal evidence.
10.
Thus an opportunity to canvass before this tribunal about their case to the effect that it was a sham and bogus
contract and they are really the workman of the II Party is lost for them. As such H S Hiriyanna subsequently raised a
dispute challenging his termination which is adjudicated today (in C R No. 06/2014). Whatever observation made in the
said case applies to the present case also. The Points of reference presupposes that the 1stParty 24 workers are the
workmen of the 2ndParty.When it is shown by the 2nd Party that Hiriyanna had employed 17 workers, the 1st Party failed
to demonstrate that the dispute is espoused on behalf of 24 workers working at Crush and Concentrator
Department.Now, the law is very much settled that when a recognized union or inside union is not co-operating with the
workman having dispute with its employer, there is no illegality on the part of outside union espousing the dispute. The
question is only with regard to the identity of the canteen workers. The documents marked through the management
witness are insufficient to hold that they were working directly under the control and supervision of the II Party
management. MW 2 has clarified that the II Party used to disburse the wages to the workmen on behalf of the
contractor. If their service is terminated without following the mandatory procedure by Section 25(F) of the Act, the
proper party to answer the claim is H S Hiriyanna who held the licence for catering in the 2nd Party but he figures in the
list of the 1st Party workmen. The facilities provided to the canteen is a welfare measure for the benefit of the
employees of the II Party. It is nowhere shown that these workmen worked against any sanctioned post. On the top of it
the mining operation itself has closed and the work force has migrated. In the light of the above, the tribunal does not
find any irregularity in not regularising the service of 24 workers who worked in the canteen. Hence,
AWARD
Reference is Rejected
(Dictated to U D C, transcribed by him, corrected and signed by me on 1st April 2019)
JUSTICE SMT. RATHNAKALA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 674-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ
;wukbVsM bf.M;k b';ksjsa'k dEiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V
vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] ,ukZdqye ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 12@2015½ dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&17012@146@2014&vkbZvkj¼,e½]
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 674.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 12/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Ernakulam now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to management of
M/s United India Insurance Company Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on
18.4.2019.
[No. L-17012/146/2014-IR(M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2745
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
ERNAKULAM
Present: Shri V. Vijaya Kumar, B.Sc., LLM, Presiding Officer.
(Thursday the 2nd day of April, 2019)
ID No.12/2015
Workman :
Shri.Vijayan Pillai.P.,
Sikha Bhavanam,
Panayam, Kollam.
By Adv. B.Mohanlal
Management
:
1) The General Manager,
United India Insurance Company Ltd.,
Head Office, Chennai.
2) The Deputy General Manager,
United India Insurance Company Ltd.,
Regional Office, Kochi.
By Adv. T.J.Lakshmanan and M/s. B.S.Krishnan Associates
This case coming up for hearing on 02.04.2019, this Tribunal cum Labour Court passed the following on the
same day.
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of subsection (1) subsection (2A) of Section 10 of Industrial
Dispute Act 1947 the Central Government/Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-17012/146/2014-IR(M) dated
19.02.2015 referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication.
2.
The dispute is
“Whether the action of the Management of M/s. United India Insurance Company limited is denying
the pay arrears and statutory benefits of Shri.Vijayan Pillai, Ex-caretaker of the Training Institute of the
Company on his termination is correct? If not, then what relief workman is entitled to?”
3.
While the pleadings were being finalized, the Management raised a preliminary issue regarding the
maintainability of the dispute and reference. According to the Management the only issue to be answered is whether
there is denial of pay arrears or statutory benefits to the workman on his termination and if so what is the relief that he is
entitled to. Legality or justifiability of the termination is not a question referred for adjudication. S.2A was introduced as
per Industrial Dispute Amendment Act, 1965. Tracing the legislative history, it was pointed out by the learned Counsel
for the Management that S.2A was incorporated into Industrial Dispute Act to enable individual workman to challenge
dismissal and discharge without being sponsored by the Union or a number of workmen. Hence it is mandatory that
legality or justifiability of termination is part of the reference and dispute, when an individual workman invokes S.2A(I)
for adjudication of his claim.
4.
The Counsel for the workman submitted that he challenged the legality of termination also before the Assistant
Labour Commissioner (C), however the reference is silent on same. Hence he again moved the Assistant Labour
Commissioner (C) for modification of the reference and to include the challenge of illegality of his termination. His
application was disposed of by the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) holding that the dispute raised by the workman
is pending before this court. Further the Counsel for the workman submitted that inspite of the above How, this dispute
can be entertained by this Court under section 2(A)(2) of Industrial Dispute Act. He further submitted that there are
authorities to support his argument. But he failed to produce any authority inspite of the fact that adequate time was
given for production of the same.
5.
The specific issue to be decided is,
“Whether a reference under S.2(A)(I) read with S.10(I)(d) of Industrial dispute Act. 1947 is maintainable when
the eligibility or justifiability of termination is not referred for adjudication.”
6.
As per S.2(A)(I) of the Act, when an employer discharges, dismisses, retrenches or otherwise terminates the
services of an individual workman any dispute or difference between that workman and his employee connected with or
arising out of such termination shall be deemed to be an industrial dispute. From the language of the section it is clear
that only disputes relating to discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or termination of individual workman will fall within
the purview of the Section. Any dispute connected with or arising out of such termination implies that the legality or
justifiability of the termination itself shall be under challenge.
2746
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
7.
The Counsel for the workman strongly argued that this court can decide the dispute invoking section 2(A)(2) of
the ID Act. As per Section 2(A)(2), a workman specified in section 2(A)(I) can move the Labour court or Tribunal for
the adjudication of the dispute. There is no provision under the Act to convert a reference under Section 10 read with
Section 2(A)(1) to an application under 2(A)(2). Further an application under S.2(A)(2) shall be filed within three years
of termination.
8.
The learned counsel for the Management/Petitioner also pointed out that in view of the mandate under
Section10(4) of the Industrial Dispute Act when the appropriate Government has specified the points of dispute for
adjudication, this court shall confine its adjudication to those points.
In view of the above, the preliminary issue regarding maintainability of the dispute is answered in favour of the
Management.
9.
The first relief claimed in the claim statement by the workman is to declare the dismissal of the workman
without any reason, illegal and unjust. As already pointed out, this claim of the workman is not maintainable as it is not
part of the reference at all. It is seen from the records of the proceedings that the workman moved the Assistant Labour
Commissioner (C) on 05.07.2016 for amending the reference.
Because of the pendency of this Industrial Dispute, the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) refused to entertain
the amendment application. In view of the finding in the preliminary issue, nothing remains in this reference for
adjudication.
For the reasons stated above an award is passed dismissing the claim of the workman as not maintainable.
The award will come into force one month after publication in the official gazette.
Dictated to the Personal Assistant, transcribed and typed by him, corrected and passed by me on this the 2nd day
of April, 2019.
V. VIJAYA KUMAR, Presiding Officer
APPENDIX
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 675-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ
;wukbVsM ÝsV dSfj;j izkbosV fyfeVsM ,oa vU; izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V
vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 23@2016½ dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&26012@1@2016&vkbZvkj¼,e½]
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 675.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 23/2016) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in the relation to the
management of M/s United Freight Carriers Pvt. Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central
Government on 18.4.2019.
[No. L-26012/1/2016-IR(M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated the 28th day of February, 2019
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 23/2016
Between:
Sri Mulakapalli Raju,
S/o Late Chinna Rao,
D.No.26-1-16/9, S.C. Colony,
Chinagantyada, Gajuwada,
Visakhapatnam (A.P.)
…Petitioner
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2747
AND
1.
M/s. United Freight Carriers Pvt. Limited,
D.no.7-4-32, Chettivanipalem, Gajuwaka,
Visakhapatnam – 530026.
2.
M/s. Sri Krishna Engineering & Construction Co.,
‘Kalyani’, 9/2, M.V.P. Colony,
Visakhapatnam (A.P.) – 530 017.
…Respondents
Appearances:
For the Petitioner
:
Sri Paila Srinivasa Rao, Advocate
For the Respondents
:
Sri A.S. Rama Sarma, Advocate for R2
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L- 26012/1/2016-IR(M) dated 15.2.2016/
17.2.2016 referred the following dispute under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal
between the management of M/s. United Freight Carriers Pvt. Limited and their workman. The reference is,
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of management of M/s. United Freight Carriers Pvt. Ltd., Visakhapatnam and Sri Krishna
Engineering & Construction Co. Visakhapatnam (Contrator of RINL, Visakhapatnam Steel Plant) in
termination of Shri Mulkapalli Raju, Ex-contract worker in violation of Section 25(F) of Industrial Disputes
Act, is legal and justified? If not, to what relief he is entitled?”
On receipt of the reference it is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 23/2016 and notices were issued to the parties
concerned.
2.
The case stands posted for filing of claim statement and documents by the Petitioner Union.
3.
Inspite of repeated calls, the Petitioner did not turn up. Several opportunities have been given to the Petitioner
Workman to attend the court to prosecute the case. But the Petitioner workman failed to attend this Tribunal which
clearly indicates that perhaps the dispute of the Petitioner workman has already been settled and the Petitioner has got
nothing to raise any claim against the Respondents. Hence, the case of the Petitioner workman is closed and a ‘No
dispute’ award is passed.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant, corrected by me on this the 28th day of
February, 2019.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner
Witnesses examined for the Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 676-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ
ts;wMh lhesUV fyfeVsM izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;
ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] dksydkrk ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 89@2015½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh;
ljdkj dks 23-4-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&29011@13@2015&vkbZvkj¼,e½]
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
2748
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 676.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 89/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Kolkata now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s JUD Cements Limited
and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 23.4.2019.
[No. L-29011/13/2015-IR(M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Reference No. 89 of 2015
Parties : Employers in relation to the management of CMD, JUD Cements Limited
AND
Their workmen
Present : Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra, Presiding Officer
Appearance:
On behalf of the Management
:
None
On behalf of the Workmen
:
None
Dated: 12th April, 2019.
Industry: Cement
AWARD
By Order No.L-29011/13/2015-IR(M) dated 28.10.2015 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in
exercise of its powers under Section 10(1)(d) and (2A) referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
“Whether the action of the management of JUD Cements Ltd. by not paying full & final payment to its
employee Shri Sudhansu Gantayet, Ex-Vice President (operation) is legal and/or justified? If not, what relief
workman is entitled to?”
2.
When the case is taken up for hearing on 02.04.2019, none appeared for the parties concerned. In fact the
parties never appeared before this Tribunal. It transpires from record that though this reference is pending in this
Tribunal since 30.11.2015 and inspite of all the opportunities, neither the workman concerned has filed his statement of
claim, nor the management has filed its written statement to proceed further with the case.
4.
On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the workman has no grievance at
present in respect of his full and final payment as mentioned in the order of reference. Therefore, there exists no dispute
for adjudication.
5.
Therefore, the reference is disposed of accordingly.
Justice RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer
Dated, Kolkata,
The 12th April, 2019.
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 677-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ
dsUnzh; Hk.Mkj.k fuxe ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] dksydkrk ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 58@2014½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks
dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26-4-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&42011@1@2014&vkbZvkj¼,e½]
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 677.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 58/2014) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Kolkata now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Central Warehousing
Corporation and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 26.4.2019.
[No. L-42011/1/2014-IR(M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2749
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Reference No. 58 of 2014
Parties: Employers in relation to the management of the Regional Manager, Central Warehousing Corporation
AND
Their workmen.
Present : Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra, Presiding Officer
Appearance :
On behalf of the Management
: None
On behalf of the Workmen
: None
Dated: 22nd April, 2019.
Industry : Warehousing
AWARD
By Order No.L-42011/1/2014-IR(M) dated 04.07.2014 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in
exercise of its powers under Section 10(1)(d) and (2A) referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
“Whether the action of the management of Central Warehousing Corporation in not relieving all workmen I
the transfer list dated 28.8.13 & 5.10.13 & arbitrarily choosing the workmen to be relieved in unfair manner is
legal and/or justified? If not, to what relief the workmen concerned are entitled to?”
2.
In this reference case both the union and the management previously entered appearance through their
respective learned counsel. Union filed its statement of claim praying for implementing transfer orders dated 28.08.2013
and 05.10.2013 issued by the Assistant Manager (Amin). Management filed its written statement denying the claim of
the union. Union also filed its rejoinder to counter the statement of the management. Photo copies of some documents
have also been filed by the union to support its case. But the union, as it transpires from record, remained absent since
04.07.2018. Inspite of sufficient opportunity the union has not led any evidence to substantiate its case. It also transpires
from record that the union refused to receive the notice dated 12.06.2018 issued by this Tribunal.
3.
On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the union has no grievance at
present in respect of not relieving the workmen as per transfer list dated 28.8.13 & 5.10.13 as mentioned in the order of
reference. Therefore, there exists no dispute for adjudication.
4.
Therefore, the reference is disposed of accordingly.
Justice RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer
Dated, Kolkata,
The 22nd April, 2019.
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 678-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ
vks-,u-th-lh- fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 7@2004½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS
tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23-4-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- tsM&16025@4@2019&vkbZvkj¼,e½]
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 678.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 7/2004) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s O.N.G.C. Limited
and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 23.4.2019.
[No. Z-16025/4/2019-IR(M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
2750
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,
Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,
Ahmedabad,
Dated 04th April, 2019
Complaint (CGITA) No. 07/2004
(Old Complaint (ITC) No. 8/2010)
Senva Ambalal,
Village Kathwada, Tal. Matar, Navgam, Kheda (Gujarat)
C/o
Gujarat Petroleum Employees Union,
434-46, Gandhivas, Koba Road, Sabarmati,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
…Complainant
V/s
1. M/s Public Power Mazdoor Kamdar Sahakari Mandli Ltd.,
Opp. Dhoot Sagar Dairy, Highway Road, Mehsana (Gujarat)
2. M/s Parishram Labour Co-operative Society Ltd.,
19, Sahjanand Shopping Centre, Shahibaug, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
3. The G.G.M. (P),
ONGC, Avni Bhavan, 5th Floor, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
4. The General Manager (OBG),
ONGC, Avni Bhavan, 5th Floor, Sabarmati,
Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
…Respondents
For the Complainant
:
Sh. Arish L. Saiyed
For the Opponent No.1
:
Absent
For the Opponent No.2
:
Absent
For the Opponent No. 3 & 4
:
Shri K.V. Gadhia & Shri M.K. Patel
ORDER
1. This is a complaint Ex. 1 moved under Section 33-A of the Industrial Disputes Act by the complainant Senva
Ambalal on 17.02.2000 in Reference (ITC) No. 35/1998 alleging that the complainant has been working with
the opposite party no. 1 M/s Public Power Mazdoor Kamdar Sahakari Mandli Ltd., Opp. Dhoot Sagar Dairy,
Highway Road, Mehsana under sham arrangement of contract on the establishment of opposite party no. 3 The
G.G.M. (P), ONGC, Avni Bhavan, 5th Floor, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad and opposite party no. 4 The General
Manager, ONGC, Avni Bhavan, 5th Floor, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad, so called real employer. The opposite party
no. 1 was later changed by the opposite party no. 2 M/s Parishram Labour Co-operative Society Ltd., 19,
Sahjanand Shopping Centre, Shahibaug, Ahmedabad. He has further alleged that he has also been a workman
in Reference (ITC) No. 35/1998 shown at serial no. 48 in the list attached with the reference. He has been
working at the establishment of ONGC at GGS II (OEG) since 08.01.1987 without any break with full
satisfaction of the supervisors. He worked during January 1999, February 1999 and March 1999, thereafter for
4 days in April 1999 but he was not paid the wages for the said period despite making written representation to
ONGC. He has further alleged that he has been working since 1987 but his services were terminated orally
without paying any notice and notice pay. Therefore, he has prayed for reinstatement with full back wages and
the unpaid as stated above.
2. All the parties were issued notice but only the opposite party no. 3 The G.G.M. (P), ONGC, Avni Bhavan, 5th
Floor, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad submitted the written statement Ex. 4 submitting that there was no master
servant relationship with the workman and ONGC and after enquiry, no such workman was found on the
muster roll of ONGC. He never made any representation to the ONGC for pending of wages; therefore, the
complaint is liable to be rejected.
3. Earlier the complainant has deposed vide Ex. 5 and reiterated the facts stated in the complaint, thereafter the
complaint was proceeded ex-parte and the then Presiding Officer, Shri B.I. Kazi passed the order ex-parte and
allowed the complaint with 60% back wages.
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2751
4. Against the said ex-parte award, the opposite party ONGC has filed Misc. Application (CGITA) No. 01/2007
for restoration of Complainant (CGITA) No. 07/2004 and said Misc. Application (CGITA) No. 01/2007 was
allowed by the State Industrial Tribunal vide order dated 14.09.2010.
5. After the restoration of the complaint, the complainant Ambalal K. Senva has expired on 14.10.2009 and legal
heirs of the complainant Paresh Ambalal Senva moved an application Ex. 23 which was allowed on 26.07.2017
and legal heirs were substituted accordingly in place of deceased complainant.
6. On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:
i.
Whether the deceased complainant Ambalal Sanva was a contract employee and the contract was sham and
bogus?
ii.
Whether the complainant was the employee of ONGC?
iii.
To what relief, if any, the legal heir of the deceased complainant is entitled?
7. Issue No. i, ii and iii: As all the issues are interrelated, therefore, are decided together. The legal heirs of the
complainant filed an affidavit 24 reiterating the averments made in the complaint. In his cross-examination, he
has stated that besides him, his mother and sisters are the legal heirs of his deceased father. He is working as a
security guard in a company through contractor who is also a contractor of ONGC. He has stated that his
deceased father was also a contract labour. He does not know as to whether ONGC has given any appointment
letter to his father or not. He has further stated that the contractor paid the wages to his father. He does not have
any proof to show that his father was served with the contractor for more than 240 days in any calendar year.
His father was received wages for the days he used to work. His father has maintained the whole family till his
death.
8. From the pleadings of the parties and oral evidence available on record, it is established that the deceased
complainant was the employee of contractor M/s Public Power Mazdoor Kamdar Sahakari Mandli Ltd. ONGC
has no master and servant relationship with the deceased complainant, therefore, ONGC bears no liability
regarding the deceased complainant. Considering the above stated facts and settled legal position by the apex
court that even in non-compliance of Section 25 F with the daily wager, proper relief to be granted is
compensation and not reinstatement as held by the apex court in case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited V/s
Mansingh, 2012 (1) SCC 558. Since the complainant was expired on 14.10.2009 i.e. during the pendency of the
complaint, hence even on this point, the complainant is not entitled to get reinstated. As held by the apex court
in various pronouncements, the legal heirs of the complainant are entitled to get lump-sum compensation. Thus
it would be appropriate to award a lump-sum compensation of Rs.50000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) to be paid
to the legal heirs of the deceased complainant in lieu of back wages and all other employment dues. No relief
can be granted against ONGC. All the issues are decided accordingly.
9. The opposite party no. 1 M/s Public Power Mazdoor Kamdar Sahakari Mandli Ltd., Opp. Dhoot Sagar Dairy,
Highway Road, Mehsana is directed to pay the aforesaid amount of Rs.50000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) to the
legal heirs of the deceased complainant within 60 days from the publication of this order.
10. The order is passed accordingly.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 679-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj LVsV cSad
bankSj ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 127@2005½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26@4@2019 dks
izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&12012@30@2005&vkbZvkj¼ch&1½]
ch- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 679.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 127/2005) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of Indore and
their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 26.4.2019.
[No. L-12012/30/2005-IR(B-1)]
B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.
2752
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/127/2005
General Secretary,
Nationalised Bank Karmchari Sangathan,
9, Sanwer Road,
Ujjain.
…Workman/Union
Versus
General Manager (O),
State Bank of Indore,
Head Office, Indore (MP)
…Management
AWARD
Passed on this 28th day of March 2019
1. As per letter dated 11-11-2005 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labor, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-
12012/30/2005-IR(B-I). The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of Indore in imposing the penalty of stoppage of
Head Cashier allowance and stoppage of 2 annual increments as well as treating the suspension period as
“off duty” after reducing the proposed punishment of compulsory retirement from service on Shri
Jagdish Prasad Gautam is legal and justified? If not, what relief he is entitled?”
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Workman filed statement of claim. In his
statement of claim, workman has stated that he was first appointed as clerk cum cashier with the Vidisha
branch of the Bank on 8-6-77. During the course of service, he was transferred at Nateran branch and was
posted as Head cashier in the year 1982. He was issued a charge sheet by the department on the basis of
information, given by the Branch Manager of the Bank on 16-3-1985. This charge sheet was further amended
and an amended charge sheet dated 9-4-85 was issued, he filed a written reply of the charge sheet. Mr.
J.C.Mahajan was appointed as Enquiry Officer who conducted enquiry without allowing the workman to bring
his representative. The Presenting Officer persuaded the workman to admit the charges and it is on his
persuasion, he admitted the charges. The Enquiry Officer filed an Enquiry Report dated 12-6-85 holding the
workman guilty. The finding was against fact and evidence because there was no witness to examine during the
enquiry to prove the charges. The appointing authority passed order of dismissal on the basis of Enquiry Report
without giving any opportunity of personal hearing on the proposed sentence. The workman filed an appeal
before the departmental Appellate Authority who set aside the termination and passed the impugned
punishment regarding stoppage of Head cashier allowance and 2 annual increments as well as of treating
suspension period as “off duty” which is against law and against bipartite settlement above mentioned.
Accordingly. the workman prayed for setting aside of impugned punishment and back wages accordingly.
3. The employer Bank, in their Written statement of defense just raised the preliminary objection that since the
workman has now been promoted as Manager and posted in Vidisha Branch, he cannot be treated as a
workman as defined under Section 2(s) of ID Act, 1947, hence the reference is not maintainable before the
Tribunal. It was also pleaded that during the period workman was posted in Nateran branch, complaints of
grave misconduct and misbehavior were received against him. He was suspended on 24-1-1985 and
chargesheet dated 16-3-1985 , which was amended and amended chargesheet dated 9th April 1985 were served
on him. The charges were that on 29th September 1984, workman refused to open the cash safe of the branch
adversely affecting the working of Bank, on that date, he did not furnish his cash scroll to the Manager and
other 3 charges regarding misappropriation of money and in subordination, mentioned in the para-9 of Written
Statement asunder-
1.
The applicant on 29-9-84 refused to open the cash safe, therefore the Branch Manager had to
bring Rs.3000 from the Cooperative Bank so as to run the business of the Bank;
2.
On 29-9-1984, the applicant did not handover his cash scroll to the Manager, therefore, a new
scroll was to be opened so as to discharge the daily work;
3.
On 8-12-1984, the applicant did not make payment of Rs.30/- against withdrawal made by
Bank employee Shri Chandrakant Changad despite it was passed by Branch Manager;
4.
On examining the case of dated 10-12-1984, difference of Rs.30/- was found in the cash memo
and cash so collected and payment of Rs.30/- was found to have been made on 10-12-1984
whereas it was passed for 8-12-1984.
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2753
5.
The applicant doesnot comply with the office orders issued by the Branch Manager form time
to time and refuses to put signatures on the registers of such orders(e.g he refused to put
signatures for the orders dated 28-9-84 and 8-12-84).
4. It was further pleaded that the workman filed a written explanation for the charges vide his letter dated 27-3-
1985 which were not satisfactory and a regular DE was instituted. The workman unconditionally admitted all
the charges without any fear or coercion. He refused to cross-examine any witness, he also refused to adduce
any evidence in his defense and on the basis of his plead, held guilty. The Enquiry Officer filed his report dated
12-6-1985 holding the charges proved against the workman. After receiving the Enquiry Report, workman was
issued show cause notice on the point of proposed sentence of dismissal on 12-6-1985. He filed written reply of
the notice on 4-7-85. After considering the material, a sentence regarding dismissal was passed by Appointing
Authority on 7-7-85. Workman preferred a departmental appeal which was disposed vide order dated 4-7-86
setting aside the dismissal and passing the impugned punishment as mentioned. It was further pleaded that the
Departmental Enquiry was conducted legally and properly and sentence imposed is not shockingly dis-
appropriate to the charges proved.
5. On the basis of respective pleadings, preliminary issue/ point for determination regarding fairness and legality
of departmental enquiry was framed by his learned predecessor. Preliminary issue was decided by my learned
predecessor vide order dated 25-4-2017 whereby he held the Departmental Enquiry proper and legal. This order
shall be part of this award. Following other issues were framed:-
(2)
Whether the charges alleged against workman are proved from evidence in Enquiry Proceedings?
(3)
Whether the punishment of stoppage of Head Cashier Allowance and two annual increments and
compulsory retirement imposed against workman is legal and proper?
(4)
If so, to what relief the workman is entitled to?
6. It is further to mention here that no further evidence was adduced on the point of 3 issues as mentioned which
were framed later on after deciding preliminary issue. Mr. R. Nagwanshi, representative of the Union preferred
to file written argument which is on record. Learned counsel for management has also filed written argument. I
have gone through the respective written argument and also the record.
7. Point for determination No.2 & 3
In his written statement of claim, workman has himself admitted that he admitted the guilt during the course of
Departmental Enquiry. His case is that he did so on the promise that he will not be terminated from service.
The burden is on the workman to prove this fact of the alleged assurance before the Enquiry Officer to prove
his case that his admission of guilt was not unconditional rather it was after a promise given by the Bank/
Enquiry Officer. He could do so before the Appellate Authority. The records of enquiry have been proved in
evidence during the hearing of preliminary issue No.1. The written admission given by the workman before the
Enquiry Officer is on record which does not show that it was given involuntarily hence on the basis of
admission of charges which is not disputed at any stage, it is held that charges against the workman were
proved during the domestic enquiry.
I am supported by a decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in case of Central Bank of India vs
Karumamoy reported in AIR-1986-80-266 wherein it has been held that if the workman admits his guilt,
then to insist upon the management to let an evidence about the allegations will be an empty formality.
8. On the basis of above discussion, it is held that charges against workman were proved during the domestic
enquiry on the basis of his admission of guilt. The charges proved against workman are as under:-
1.
The applicant on 29-9-84 refused to open the cash safe, therefore the Branch Manager had to
bring Rs.3000 from the Cooperative Bank so as to run the business of the Bank;
2.
On 29-9-1984, the applicant did not handover his cash scroll to the Manager, therefore, a new
scroll was to be opened so as to discharge the daily work;
3.
On 8-12-1984, the applicant did not make payment of Rs.30/- against withdrawal made by
Bank employee Shri Chandrakant Changad despite it was passed by Branch Manager;
4.
On examining the case of dated 10-12-1984, difference of Rs.30/- was found in the cash memo
and cash so collected and payment of Rs.30/- was found to have been made on 10-12-1984
whereas it was passed for 8-12-1984;
5.
The applicant doesnot comply with the office orders issued by the Branch Manager form time
to time and refuses to put signatures on the registers of such orders(e.g he refused to put
signatures for the orders dated 28-9-84 and 8-12-84).
9. These charges relate to the dereliction of duty insubordination hence are in the category of grave misconduct
warranting major punishment. The appellate authority has taken a lenient view in setting aside the termination
2754
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
passed by the Appointing Authority and converting it into stoppage of Head Cashier allowance and 2 annual
increments as well as treating suspension period as “off duty”. Hence in no parameter, the charges can be held
shockingly disproportionate to the charges. Point No.2 is answered accordingly.
10. Point for determination No.4-
On the basis of above discussion, the applicant is not entitled to any relief.
11. In the result, award is passed as under:-
(1) The action of the management of State Bank of Indore in imposing the penalty of stoppage of Head
Cashier allowance and stoppage of 2 annual increments as well as treating the suspension period as
“off duty” after reducing the proposed punishment of compulsory retirement from service on Shri
Jagdish Prasad Gautam is legal and justified.
(2) The workman Shri Jagdish Prasad Gautam is not entitled to any relief.
12. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.
Dated:28-3-2019
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 680-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh;
LVsV cSad ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 66@2009½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26@4@2019 dks
izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&12011@70@2008&vkbZvkj¼ch- 1½]
ch- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 680.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 66/2009) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and
their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 26.4.2019.
[No. L-12011/70/2008-IR(B-1)]
B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/66/2009
General Secretary,
Dainik Vetan Bhogi Bank Karmchari Sangathan,
F-1, Tripti Vihar, Opp. Engg. College,
Ujjain.
…Workman/Union
Versus
Chief General Manager,
State Bank of India,
Regional Head Office,
Hoshangabad Road, Bhopal.
…Management
AWARD
Passed on this 27th day of March 2019
1. As per letter dated 1-7-2009 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labor, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-
12011/70/2008-IR(B-I). The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether Shri Kamal Damodare S/o Shri Motiram Damodare is entitled for payment of difference of
wages as per Bipartite Settlement? If yes, what relief he is entitled to?”
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Workman filed statement of claim. In his
statement of claim, he has claimed his dues from 1-9-95 to 1-4-02 as arrears with an allegation that he had been
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2755
working since 1-9-95 as a daily wager with the MG Road, Indore branch of the bank. He was disengaged by the
employers on 1-4-2002. He raised a dispute with the Central Government and reference was made which was
registered as R/132/95 and award was passed on 25-4-2014. He further stated that his wages were paid by the
Bank from the profit and loss account. He is entitled to pay, details given in Para-9 & 11 of the petition. In the
light of Desai Award and Ist Bipartite Agreement dated 19-10-66 which was not paid to him though he was
entitled to get it. Accordingly he has sought relief regarding the payment of his arrears as mentioned above.
3. Management filed its Written Statement of defense wherein they denied that workman was engaged at any
point of time with the Bank. It was further pleaded by the employers that the workman was simply engaged for
1-2 hours in a day that too purely on casual basis. He was not employed by the Bank. His engaged was against
rules. He was disengaged later on. He raised dispute on the basis of which reference was made by appropriate
Government to this court which was registered as CGIT/LC/R/132/05 and was answered in negative.
Accordingly, he is not entitled to get regular pay scale/ difference of wages as claimed by him which is only for
permanent employees.
4. Both the sides have examined on oath themselves. Workman has examined himself on oath whereas
management has examined Hariom Gupta, Chief Manager on oath who have stated and supported their
respective claims as mentioned above. Copy of the award dated passed in the reference case R/132/2005 is also
on record. At the time of argument, none appeared from the side of Bank.
5. Mr. Ram Nagwanshi appeared as Union Representative on behalf of workman. He submitted oral argument
and also filed memorandum of argument I have gone through the written argument and also gone through the
records.
6. The main argument on behalf of workman is that when it is proved that he has worked with the employer Bank,
he was entitled to difference of salary in the light of bipartite agreement and award as mentioned by him,
details given in his statement of claim whereas the argument of the Bank is that this agreement and award
applies only to regular/ permanent employees of the Bank and not to the casual labors. Hence the point for
determination which arise is as under:-
“Whether it is proved that the workman has been in engagement, may be as daily wager on regular basis
or not.”
Award (Copy) in the connected reference case is on record. Perusal of which reveals that the claim of workman
that he worked continuously for 240 days in the preceding 12 months of his date of disengagement was not
proved and accordingly his disengagement was not held violative of Section 25 B of I.D.Act. It was also held
that the employers were not bound to comply the provisions of Section 25-F before his disengagement in his
case and his disengagement was found legal and proper. There is nothing on record to show that this finding by
the Tribunal has been overturned by any superior Court hence when it is not proved that workman has been in a
regular engagement may be as a daily wager, he cannot be held entitled to any difference of pay as claimed by
him under the award and bipartite agreement.
7. On the basis of above discussion, it is held that the workman Kamal Damodare is not entitled to difference of
wages as per bipartite settlement.
8. In the result, award is passed as under:-
“The workman Shri Kamal Damodare S/o Shri Motiram Damodare is not entitled for payment of
difference of wages as per Bipartite Settlement.”
9. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labor & Employment as per rules.
Dated : 27-3-2019
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 681-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj LVsV cSad
bankSj ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 165@2002½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26@4@2019 dks
izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&12012@162@2002&vkbZvkj¼ch&1½]
ch- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo
2756
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 681.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 165/2002) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,
Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of Indore and their
workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 26.4.2019.
[No. L-12012/162/2002-IR(B-1)]
B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/165/2002
General Secretary,
Rashtriya Bank Karmchari Sangthan,
9, Sanwer Road, Ujjain (MP)
…Workman/Union
Versus
General Manager (Operations),
State Bank of Indore,
Head Office, 5, Yeshwant Niwas Road,
Indore (MP)
…Management
AWARD
Passed on this 25th day of March 2019
1. As per letter dated 7-11-2002 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-
12012/162/2002-IR(B-I). The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action of the management of General Manager (Operation), State Bank of Indore in
stopping 4 annual increments with retrospective e effect in r/o Shri Narendra Shah, Daftari is justified?
If not, what relief the workman is entitled?”
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Workman filed statement of claim. In his
statement of claim, workman has alleged that he was first appointed on 29th August 1981 in Paitlavat branch of
State Bank of Indore as a peon. During course of his employment, he was promoted as Daftary in the year
1989. In the year 1994, when he was posted in Rajgarh branch of the Bank, he was called by the then employer
and was given charge of Head cashier and he worked as Head cashier, doing clerical work since 1997. It was
further alleged that the Manager instructed him to issue certificate to one Suraj Pawar, on the fact that Suraj
Pawar has been working since last 3 years with the Bank as a daily wager employee which he issued under the
instruction of the Branch Manager. Also it was alleged that a charge sheet was issued to him with reference to
this certificate and enquiry was conducted against him which was against principles of natural justice, without
giving him a fair chance to put his defense and he was held guilty for the charge of issuing unauthorizedly a
false certificate. It is also his case that before awarding impugned punishment, no opportunity was given to him
on the point of sentence. He raised the dispute with the Government, accordingly he has claimed that the
punishment being excessive be set-aside.
3. The employer bank has pleaded in his Written Statement of defense that when the applicant was posted as
Daftary at Rajgarh branch, he committed certain omissions and commissions and misconduct under Ist
Bipartite Settlement. He was served charge sheet alleging charges and was directed to submit a reply. He
submitted a reply which was not satisfactory. Therefore a domestic enquiry was held. Mr. A.K.Joshi an officer
of the Bank was deputed as Enquiry Officer and S.N.Harbude was made Presenting Officer. During the
enquiry, the workman admitted the charges in writing and in view of his admission/ plead guilty, the charges
were held proved by the Enquiry Officer and thereafter impugned punishment with regard to stoppage of 4
increments with cumulative effect w.e.f. 1991 was passed. Also it was pleaded that the workman did not prefer
any appeal or representation and accepted the punishment and also that the enquiry was conducted properly
keeping in view the principles of natural justice in mind and the punishment is not excessive.
4. On the basis of pleadings, following issues/ points for determination were framed by my learned predecessor:-
(1) Whether the domestic enquiry conducted against workman is proper and legal?
This issue was decided as preliminary issue vide order dated 16-9-2014. This order is also a part of this
award. The domestic enquiry was held legal and properly conducted. Thereafter following other issues/
points for determination was framed by my learned predecessor-
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2757
(2) Whether charges against workman are proved?
(3) Whether punishment of with-holding 4 increments of workman is legal?
(4) What relief the workman is entitled?
5. No further evidence was adduced by any of the parties on these issues. I have heard argument of Mr.Ram
Nagwanshi. None present from the side of management. no written argument were filed by management. I have
gone through the record.
6. Point for determination No.2-
7. There is on record, written admission of charge filed by the workman during the enquiry. In his statement of
claim also, workman has stated that he issued a certificate but on the instructions of the Manager. Hence, he
does not deny the issue of certificate for which he was not authorized. His claim that this certificate was issued
on instruction of Manager requires proof. The enquiry report itself states that no evidence was given by the
workman during enquiry nor did he cross-examined any of the witnesses. Hence on the basis of his admission
alone, the Enquiry Officer was fully justified in law and fact holding the charges against the workman proved.
On the basis of above discussion, the charges levelled against workman during the domestic enquiry are held
proved on the basis of his admission. Issue No.2 is answered accordingly.
8. Point for determination No.3-
9. The charge proved against workman is that he exceeded his jurisdiction and issued certificate which he was not
authorized and the punishment given for the charge is stoppage of 4 increments with retrospective effect. There
is nothing on record to show that this punishment is excessive. Particularly in the light of fact that there had
been complaints of wrong omissions and commissions and misconduct against the workman and also that he
did not improve even after the punishment and was compulsorily retired when he was found guilty for other
charges of misconduct. Hence it is held that the punishment imposed is not shockingly disproportionate so as
to warrant interference by this Tribunal. It should be kept in mind that this Tribunal is not an Appellate
Authority regarding the disciplinary proceedings.
10. Point for determinationNo.4-
11. On the basis of above discussion, applicant is not entitled to relief claimed by him.
12. In the result, award is passed as under:-
(1) The action of the management of General Manager (Operation), State Bank of Indore in stopping 4
annual increments with retrospective e effect in r/o Shri Narendra Shah, Daftari is justified.
(2) Workman is not entitled to any relief.
13. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.
Dated:25-3-2019
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 682-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;
ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 150@1999½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh;
ljdkj dks 25@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&20012@140@1999&vkbZvkj¼lh&1½]
,e- ds- Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019
S.O. 682.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad (Ref. No.
150 of 1999) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. BCCL and their
workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25.4.2019.
[No. L-20012/140/1999-IR(C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
2758
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.
Reference : No. 150/1999
Employer in relation to the management of Katrash Area of M/S BCCL,
AND
Their workman
Present : Sri D.K. Singh, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers:- Shri Rahul Kumar Mondal Dy. Manager
For the workman. :- Shri K.D.P.Yadav, President (NCWC)
State : Jharkhand.
Industry- Coal
Dated- 26/03/ 2019
AWARD
By order No. L-20012/140/1999-IR(C-I) dated 15/07/1999 the central Government in the Ministry of Labour
has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub–section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of BCCL in recording the age of 50 years as on 21.07.88 of Sri
Mahendra Singh, Pump Operator when his date of birth is 01.01.1949 in his service record is proper and
justified? If not, what direction is required in this respect and to what relief is the concerned workman
entitled?”
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed and during the hearing of the case, Ld. President of
Sponsoring Union has informed that workman has not been interested in contesting the case. It is felt that the
workman has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence “No dispute” award is passed. communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 683-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;
ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 151@1999½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh;
ljdkj dks 25@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&20012@587@1998&vkbZvkj¼lh&1½]
,e- ds- Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019
S.O. 683.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad (Ref. No.
151 of 1999) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. BCCL and their
workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25.4.2019.
[No. L-20012/587/1998-IR(C-1)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.
Reference : No. 150/1999
Employer in relation to the management of Bastacolla Area of M/s BCCL,
AND
Their workman
Present : Sri D.K. Singh, Presiding Officer.
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2759
Appearances:
For the Employers:- None
For the workman. :- None
State : Jharkhand.
Industry- Coal
Dated : 25/03/ 2019
AWARD
By order No. L-20012/587/1998-IR(C-I) dated 06/07/1999 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour
has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the demand of the Union to refer to Medical Board for determination of date of birth of Shri
Kapildeb Sharma, Night Guard under 1.1.76 (JBCCI) is justified? If yes, to what relief the workman is
entitled and from what date?”
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed but both parties failed to appear before this Tribunal. Notices
were issued but even then none of the parties appeared. Case is pending since long. So, it appears that the workman has
lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence “No dispute” award is passed. Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 684-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;
ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 204@1999½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh;
ljdkj dks 25@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&20012@394@1999&vkbZvkj¼lh&1½]
,e- ds- Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019
S.O. 684.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad (Ref. No.
204 of 1999) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in srelation to the management
of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25.4.2019.
[No. L-20012/394/1999-IR(C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.
Reference: No. 204/1999
Employer in relation to the management of P.B.Area of M/S.BCCL
AND
Their workman
Present : Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer.
Appearances:
For the Employers :- None
For the workman. :- None
State : Jharkhand
Industry- Coal
Dated- 27/03/ 2019
2760
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AWARD
By order No. L-20012/394/1999-IR(C-I) dated 02/12/1999, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour
has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the demand of the Union from the management of Gopalichuk Colliery of M/S BCCL to
regularize Sri Ram Chet Beldar as an office clerk is proper and justified? If yes to what relief the
workman is entitled and from what date?”
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed. The workmen appeared for certain dates, but subsequently
left appearing before this Tribunal. Case is pending since long. It appears that the workmen has lost his interest to
resolve the matter. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 685-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-
lh-lh-,y- izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 206@1999½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj
dks 25@4@2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
[la- ,y&20012@371@1999&vkbZvkj¼lh&1½]
,e- ds- Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019
S.O. 685.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad (Ref. No.
206 of 1999) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. BCCL and their
workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25.4.2019.
[No. L-20012/371/1999-IR(C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.
Reference: No. 206/1999
Employer in relation to the management of Govindpur Area of M/S. BCCL
AND
Their workman
Present : Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer.
Appearances:
For the Employers :- None
For the workman. :- None
State : Jharkhand.
Industry- Coal
Dated- 26/03/ 2019
AWARD
By order No. L-20012/371/1999-IR(C-I) dated 02/12/1999, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour
has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2761
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Govindpur Area No.III of M/S BCCL Dhanbad to deny
regularization of Sri Ram Karan Mistry Block IV as lamp issue clerk is just and proper ? If not to what
relief the workman is entitled?”
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed but both parties failed to appear before this Tribunal.
Notices were issued but even then none of the parties appeared. Case is pending since long. so, it appears that the
workmen has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence “No Dispute” Award is passed. Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 686-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-
lh-lh-,y- izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 207@1999½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj
dks 25@4@2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
[la- ,y&20012@373@1999&vkbZvkj ¼lh&1½]
,e- ds- Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019
S.O. 686.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad (Ref. No.
207 of 1999) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. BCCL and their
workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25.4.2019.
[No. L-20012/373/1999-IR(C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.
Reference: No. 207/1999
Employer in relation to the management of Govindpur Area of M/S. BCCL
AND
Their workman.
Present : Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer.
Appearances:
For the Employers :- Shri D.K.Verma, Advocate
For the workman. :- None
State : Jharkhand.
Industry- Coal
Dated- 25/03/2019
AWARD
By order No. L-20012/373/1999-IR(C-I) dated 02/12/1999, the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour
has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of South Govindpur Colliery of Area No.III M/S BCCL
Dhanbad to deny regularization of Sri Jailal Mahato as underground munshi in clerical Gr.II with
protection of wages is just and proper? If not to what relief Shri Jailal Mahato is entitled?”
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed. The workmen appeared for certain dates, but subsequently
left appearing before this Tribunal. The management remains present through lawyer. Case is pending since long. It
appears that the workmen has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence “No Dispute” Award is passed.
Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
2762
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 687-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 208@2001½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS
tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@04@-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&20012@333@2001&vkbZvkj ¼lh-I½]
,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019
S.O. 687.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1 Dhanbad
(Ref. No. 208/2001) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of M/s BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25/04/2019.
[No. L-20012/333/2001-IR(C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.
Reference: No. 208/2001
Employer in relation to the management of Barora.Area of M/S.BCCL
AND
Their workman
Present: Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer.
Appearances:
For the Employers : None
For the workman. : None
State : Jharkhand.
Industry- Coal
Dated- 28/03/2019
AWARD
By order No. L-20012/333/2001-IR(C-I) dated 21/09/2001, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in
exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub–section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the demand of the National coal workers congress of BCCL, Barora Area-1 to promote/
regularize Sri Kashi Nath Gour as Exv. Gr.D in 01.01.92 to Gr.C in 01.01.97 and in Gr.B 01.01.2001
with payment of arrear salary is proper and justified? If yes, to what relief the workman is entitled ?
2.
After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed but both parties failed to appear before this Tribunal.
Shri S.C.Gour who had received the notice on behalf of workman has informed that workman is not interested in
contesting the case. Now the case is pending since long. so, it appears that the workmen has lost his interest to resolve
the matter. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 688-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 205@2001½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS
tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@04@-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FksA
[la- ,y&20012@145@2001&vkbZvkj ¼lh-I½]
,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2763
New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019
S.O. 688.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1 Dhanbad
(Ref. No. 205/2001) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of M/s BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25/04/2019.
[No. L-20012/145/2001-IR(C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.
Reference: No. 205/2001
Employer in relation to the management of Jealgora Colliery of M/S.BCCL
AND
Their workman
Present : Shri D.K.Sing, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers : None
For the workman. : None
State : Jharkhand.
Industry- Coal
Dated-26/03/2019
AWARD
By order No. L-20012/145/2001-IR(C-I) dated 18/09/2001, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour
has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the Demand of Colliery Karmchari Sangh from the management of Jealgora Colliery of
M/S. BCCL that Sri Shiv Shankar Singh is to be promote in Techinical Grade ‘C’ in Asstt.
Foreman(Auto) is proper and justified? If yes, to what relief is entitled the claimant entitled and which
date?”
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed but both parties failed to appear before this Tribunal.
Notices were issued but even then none of the parties appeared. Case is pending since long. so, it appears that the
workmen has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence “No Dispute” Award is passed. Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 689-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 203@2001½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS
tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
[la- ,y&20012@11@2001&vkbZvkj ¼lh-I½]
,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019
S.O. 689.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1 Dhanbad
(Ref. No. 203 of 2001) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of M/s BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25/04/2019.
[No. L-20012/11/2001-IR(C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
2764
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.
Reference: No. 203/2001
Employer in relation to the management of North Tisra Colliery of M/S.BCCL
AND
Their workman
Present : Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers : Shri D.K.Verma, Advocate
For the workman. : None
State : Jharkhand.
Industry- Coal
Dated- 25/03/ 2019
AWARD
By order No. L-20012/11/2001-IR(C-I) dated 18/09/2001, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour
has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the demand of the RCMS from the management of BCCL North Tisra Colliery for
regularizing Sri Yamuna Tiwari in Techinical Grade “C” from 1991 is justified? If so to what relief is
the workman entitled and from what date?”
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed. The workmen appeared for certain dates, but subsequently
left appearing before this Tribunal. Notice were issued but even then none appeared on behalf of the workman. More
over one of the notices returned with endorsement “ Not Known”. The management remains present through lawyer.
Case is pending since long. It appears that the workmen has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence “No Dispute”
Award is passed. Communicate.
D. K.SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 690-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 203@1999½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS
tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FkkA
[la- ,y&20012@390@1999&vkbZvkj ¼lh-I½]
,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019
S.O. 690.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1 Dhanbad
(Ref. No. 203/1999) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the
management of M/s BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25/04/2019.
[No. L-20012/390/1999-IR(C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.
Reference: No. 203/1999
Employer in relation to the management of P.B.Area of M/S.BCCL
AND
Their workman
Present : Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer
[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]
Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 4] 2019@oS'kk[k 14] 1941
2765
Appearances:
For the Employers : None
For the workman. : None
State : Jharkhand.
Industry- Coal
Dated- 28/03/ 2019
AWARD
By order No. L-20012/390/1999-IR(C-I) dated 02/12/1999, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour
has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the demand of the Union before the management of Gopalichuk Colliery under P.B.Area of
M/S BCCL to regularize S/Sri Raj Ballabh Paswan and Madan Kumar Sinha as Attendance clerk is
proper and justified ? If yes, to what relief the workman are entitled and from what date?”
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed. The workmen appeared for certain dates, but
subsequently left appearing before this Tribunal. Case is pending since 13.12.1999. It appears that the workmen has lost
his interest to resolve the matter. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064
and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054. ALOK
KUMAR
Digitally signed
by ALOK KUMAR
Date: 2019.05.16
09:42:11 +05'30'