2288 GI/2019

(2767)

jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

lkIrkfgd

WEEKLY

la- 19]

ubZ fnYyh] ebZ 5—ebZ 11] 2019] 'kfuokj@oS'kk[k 15—oS'kk[k 21] 1941

No. 19]

NEW DELHI, MAY 5—MAY 11, 2019, SATURDAY/VAISAKHA 15— VAISAKHA—21, 1941

bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

कामक

कामक, लोक िशकायत तथा पशन मंालय

लोक िशकायत तथा पशन मंालय

(कामक और िशण िवभाग)

नई द ली, 26 अ ैल, 2019

का

का. आ.

. आ.

. आ. 691

691

691.—दली िवशेष पुिलस थापना अिधिनयम 1946 (1946 के अिधिनयम संया 25) के अनुभाग 6

के साथ पढ़े जाने वाले अनुभाग-5 के उप अनुभाग (1) ारा द शि य! के योग म$ क$% सरकार, िहमाचल देश क( रा)य

सरकार, गृह िवभाग क( सहमित अिधसूचना (अनुभाग ए) क( अिधसूचना संया ,ह (ए) ए (9) 31/ 2018 दनांक 20 माच0

2019, के तहत, दली िवशेष पुिलस के सदय! के अिधकार व अिधकार 1े2 का िवतार थम सूचना 3रपोट0 संया 0133

दनांक 16/11/2018 के अंतग0त धारा 409, 419, 465, 466 तथा 471, भारतीय दंड संिहता, पुिलस थाना िशमला पूव0,

िशमला िहमाचल देश, के 5प म$ भी उसी के साथ जुड़े अ:य मामल! के िलए या कसी भी अपराध या यास के संबंध म$ या

उसके संबंध म$ अपराध या सािजश या उसी लेनदेन के दौरान कए गए अपराध! या अपराध! के संबंध म$ भारत संघ के

2768

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 11, 2019/VAISAKHA 21, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

अिधकार 1े2 के भीतर कसी भी आपरािधक अिधिनयम के तहत शािमल अपराध! के अ:वेषण के िलए संपूण0 िहमाचल देश

म$ कया जाता है ।

[फा. सं. 228/47/2018-एवीडी-II]

एस.पी.आर. ि2 पाठी, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department of Personnel and Training)

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 691.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of the Delhi

Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the State

Government of Himachal Pradesh, Department of Home (Section-A) vide Notification No. Home (A)A(9)31/2018

dated 20/03/2019, hereby extends the powers and Jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment

to the whole of the State of Himachal Pradesh for investigation of FIR No. 0133 dated 16/11/2018 U/s 409, 419, 465,

466 & 471 IPC, Police Station Shimla East, Distt. Shimla, Himachal Pradesh as also for the other matters connected

with the same and for any offence or attempt, abetment and conspiracy in relation to or in connection with the said

offence or offences or offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts

including offences covered under any other Criminal Act within the jurisdiction of Union of India.

[F. No. 228/47/2018-AVD-II]

S.P.R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

वा

वा य

य

य और परवार क या

और परवार क या

और परवार क याण मंालय

ण मंालय

( वा

वा

वा य

य

य और परवार क या

और परवार क या

और परवार क याण िवभाग

ण िवभाग

ण िवभाग)

नई द ली, 30 जनवरी, 2019

का. आ.

का. आ. 692

692

692.—भारतीय आयु@वAान प3रषद् अिधिनयम,1956 (1956 का 102) क( धारा 11 क( उप- धारा (2)

ारा दC त शिD तय! का योग करते Eए के: % सरकार, भारतीय आयु@वAान प3रषद् से परामश0 करके उ अिधिनयम क(

थम अनुसूची म$, िनGिलिखत, और संशोधन करती है:-

उ थम अनुसूची म$:-

।) ‘मा:यता ाJ आयु@वAान अह0ता’शीष0क के अधीन [िजसे इसके आगे कालम(2) कहा गया है] “छ2पित शाLजी महाराज

मेिडकल िवMिवNालय, लखनऊ” के सामने अंितम िविO के पPात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए संि1िJकरण’ [िजसे इसके आगे

कालम (3) कहा गया है] से संबंिधत िविO के संबंध म$ िनGिलिखत अंत:थािपत कया जाएगा. अथा0त्:-

(2)

(3)

“िडSलोमा इन ऑVटे3WDस एंड गायनेकॉलोजी”

(डीजीओ)

(यह एक मा:यता ाJ आयु@वAान अह0ता होगी जब यह

मोती लाल नेह5 मेिडकल कॉलेज, इलाहाबाद म$ केवल

2012 को या बाद म$ वेश पाए छा2! के संबंध म$ छ2पित

शाLजी महाराज मेिडकल िवMिवNालय, लखनऊ ारा

द होगी।)

[सं. सी-18018/6/2017-एमई-I/एफटीएस-3130920]

पी. के. बंदोपायाय, अवर सिचव

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 11] 2019@oS'kk[k 21] 1941

2769

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

(Department of Health and Family Welfare)

New Delhi, the 30th January, 2019

. S.O. 692.— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical

Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes

the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

In the said Schedule-

against “Chhatrapati Sahuji Maharaj Medical University, Lucknow” under the heading ‘Recognized Medical

Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2) ], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading

‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(2)

(3)

“Diploma in Obstetrics & Gynecology”

(DGO)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when

granted by Chhatrapati Sahuji Maharaj Medical

University, Lucknow in respect of students admitted at

Moti Lal Nehru Medical College, Allahabad on or before

2012)

[No. C-18018/6/2017-ME-I/FTS-3130920]

P. K. BANDYOPADHYAY, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 27 फरवरी, 2019

का

का.आ.

आ.

आ. 693

693

693.—भारतीय आयु@वAान प3रषद अिधिनयम,1956(1956 का 102) क( धारा 11 क( उप-धारा (2)

ारा दC त शिD तय! का योग करते Eए के: % सरकार, भारतीय आयु@वAान प3रषद से परामश0 करके उ अिधिनयम क(

थम अनुसूची म$, िनGिलिखत, और संशोधन करती है:-

उ थम अनुसूची म$:-

क) ‘मा:यता ाJ आयु@वAान अह0ता’शीष0क के अधीन[िजसे इसके आगे कालम(2) कहा गया है] “आय0भ` नॉलेज

िवMिवNालय, पटना” के सामने अंितम िविO के पPात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए संि1िJकरण’ [िजसे इसके आगे कालम(3)

कहा गया है] से संबंिधत िविO के संबंध म$ िनGिलिखत अंत:थािपत कया जाएगा. अथा0त्:-

(2)

(3)

“डॉDटर ऑफ मेिडिसन (जनरल मेिडिसन)”

एमडी (जनरल मेिडिसन)

(यह एक मा:यता ाJ आयु@वAान अह0ता होगी जब यह

जवाहरलाल नेह5 मेिडकल कॉलेज, भागलपुर म$ केवल

अकादिमक स2 वष0 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 और

2016-17 म$ बेश पाए छा2! के संबंध म$ आय0भ` नॉलेज

िवMिवNालय, पटना ारा द होगी।)

[सं. यू-12012/05/2019-एमई-I/3194671]

पी. के. बंदोपाcयाय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 27th February, 2019

S.O. 693.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical Council

Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the

following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

In the said Schedule-

against “Aryabhatta Knowledge University, Patna”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical Qualification’

[hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading

2770

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 11, 2019/VAISAKHA 21, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:

(2)

(3)

“Doctor of Medicine (General Medicine)”

MD (General Medicine)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when

granted by Aryabhatta Knowledge University, Patna in

respect of students admitted at Jawaharlal Nehru Medical

College, Bhagalpur in the academic year 2013-14,

2014-15, 2015- 16 and 2016-17 only)

[No. U.12012/05/2019-ME-I/3194671]

P. K. BANDYOPADHYAY, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 27 फरवरी, 2019

का

का.आ.

आ.

आ. 694

694

694.—भारतीय आयु@वAान प3रषद अिधिनयम, 1956 (1956 का 102) क( धारा 11 क(

उप- धारा (2) ारा दC त शिD तय! का योग करते Eए के: % सरकार, भारतीय आयु@वAान प3रषद से परामश0 करके उ

अिधिनयम क( थम अनुसूची म$, िनGिलिखत, और संशोधन करती है:-

उ थम अनुसूची म$:-

क) ‘मा:यता ाJ आयु@वAान अह0ता’शीष0क के अधीन[िजसे इसके आगे कालम(2) कहा गया है] “केरल वाdय िवAान

वध िवMिवNालय, तृfशूर” के सामने अंितम िविO के पPात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए संि1िJकरण’ [िजसे इसके आगे

कालम(3) कहा गया है] से संबंिधत िविO के संबंध म$ िनGिलिखत अंत:थािपत कया जाएगा. अथा0त्:-

(2)

(3)

“डॉDटर ऑफ मेिडिसन(रेिडयो डॉयgोिसस)”

एमडी (रेिडयो डॉयgोिसस)

(यह एक मा:यता ाJ आयु@वAान अह0ता होगी जब यह

गवन0म$ट मेिडकल कॉलेज, को`ायम, केरल 1 म$ केवल

अकादिमक स2 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 और

2014-15 अकादिमक स2 म$ वेश पाए छा2! के संबंध म$

केरल वाdय िवAान वध िवMिवNालय, तृfशूर ारा

द होगी।)

[सं. यू-12012/05/2019-एमई- I/3194671]

पी. के. बंदोपाcयाय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 27th February, 2019

S.O. 694.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical

Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes

the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

In the said Schedule-

a) against “Kerala University of Health Sciences, Thrissur”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical Qualification’

[hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation

for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(2)

(3)

“Doctor of Medicine (Radio-Diagnosis)

MD (RadioDiagnosis)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when

granted by Kerala University of Health Sciences, Thrissur in

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 11] 2019@oS'kk[k 21] 1941

2771

respect of students admitted at Government Medical

College, Kottayam, Kerala in the academic year 2011-12,

2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 only).

[No. U-12012/05/2019-ME-I/3194671]

P. K. BANDYOPADHYAY, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 1 अ ैल, 2019

का

का.आ.

आ.

आ. 695

695

695.—भारतीय आयु@वAान प3रषद अिधिनयम,1956(1956 का 102) क( धारा 11 क( उप- धारा (2)

थम अनुसूची म$, िनGिलिखत, और संशोधन करती है:-

उ थम अनुसूची म$:-

।) ‘मा:यता ाJ आयु@वAान अह0ता’शीष0क के अधीन [िजसे इसके आगे कालम(2) कहा गया है] “केरल वाdय िवAान

िवMिवNालय, तृfशूर” के सामने अंितम िविO के पPात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए संि1िJकरण’ [िजसे इसके आगे

कालम(3) कहा गया है] से संबंिधत िविO के संबंध म$ िनGिलिखत अंत:थािपत कया जाएगा. अथा0त्:-

(2)

(3)

“डॉDटर

ऑफ

मेिडिसन

(फिज़कल

मेिडिसन

एंड

3रहैिVलटेशन)”

एमडी (फिज़कल मेिडिसन एंड 3रहैिVलटेशन)

(यह एक मा:यता ाJ आयु@वAान अह0ता होगी जब यह

गवन0म$ट मेिडकल कॉलेज, को`ायम म$ 2015 को या बाद

म$ िशि1त कए गए छा2! के संबंध म$ केरल वाdय

िवAान िवMिवNालय, तृfशूर ारा द होगी।)

नोट:

नोट: 1. दी गई ऐसी मा:यता अिधसूचना जारी होने क( तारीख से अिधकतम 5 वष0 के िलए होगी और उसके बाद इसका

नवीकरण करवाना होगा।

2. मा:यता के ‘नवीकरण’ क( jया वही होगी जो मा:यता दान करने के िलए लागू होती है।

3. अपेि1त मा:यता का समय से नवीकरण करवाने म$ िवफल रहने पर, प3रणामव5प, िनरपवाद 5प से, संबंिधत

lातकोर कोस0 म$ वेश बंद हो जाएगा।

[सं. यू-12012/93/2019-एमई-I/एफटीएस-3204216]

पी. के. बंदोपायाय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1st April, 2019

S.O. 695.— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical

Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes

the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

In the said Schedule-

against “Kerala University of Health Sciences, Thrissur”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical

Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the

heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted,

namely:-

(2)

(3)

“Doctor of Medicine (Physical Medicine

MD (Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation)

and Rehabilitation )”

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by

Kerala University of Health Sciences, Thrissur in respect of students

2772

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 11, 2019/VAISAKHA 21, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

being trained at Government Medical College, Kottayam on or after

2015).

Note:

The recognition so granted shall be for a maximum period of 5 years from the date of notification, upon which it

shall have to be renewed.

The procedure for ‘Renewal’ of recognition shall be same as applicable for the award for recognition.

Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required shall invariably result in stoppage of admission to the

concerned Postgraduate Courses.

[No. U-12012/93/2019-ME-I/3204216]

P. K. BANDYOPADHYAY, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 1 अ ैल, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 696

696

696.—भारतीय आयु@वAान प3रषद अिधिनयम,1956(1956 का 102) क( धारा 11 क( उप-धारा (2)

थम अनुसूची म$, िनGिलिखत, और संशोधन करती है:-

उ थम अनुसूची म$:-

।) ‘मा:यता ाJ आयु@वAान अह0ता’शीष0क के अधीन[िजसे इसके आगे कालम(2) कहा गया है] “आय0भ` नॉलेज

कहा गया है] से संबंिधत िविO के संबंध म$ िनGिलिखत अंत:थािपत कया जाएगा. अथा0त्:-

(2)

(3)

“माटर ऑफ सज0री (जनरल सज0री)”

एमएस (जनरल सज0री)

(यह एक मा:यता ाJ आयु@वAान अह0ता होगी जब यह

जवाहरलाल नेह5 मेिडकल कॉलेज, भागलपुर म$ 2016 को

या बाद म$ िशि1त कए गए छा2! के संबंध म$ आय0भ`

नॉलेज िवMिवNालय, पटना ारा द होगी।)

नोट:

नवीकरण करवाना होगा।

2. मा:यता के ‘नवीकरण’ क( jया वही होगी जो मा:यता दान करने के िलए लागू होती है।

lातकोर कोस0 म$ वेश बंद हो जाएगा।

[सं. यू-12012/92/2019-एमई-I/एफटीएस-3204209]

पी. के. बंदोपाcयाय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1st April, 2019

S.O. 696.— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical Council

Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following

further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

In the said Schedule-

against “Aryabhatta Knowledge University, Patna”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical Qualification’

[hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading

‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:-

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 11] 2019@oS'kk[k 21] 1941

2773

(2)

(3)

“Master of Surgery (General Surgery)”

MS (General Surgery)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when

granted by Aryabhatta Knowledge University, Patna in

respect of students being trained at Jawaharlal Nehru

Medical College, Bhagalpur on or after 2016).

Note:

1. The recognition so granted shall be for a maximum period of 5 years from the date of notification, upon which it

shall have to be renewed.

2. The procedure for ‘Renewal’ of recognition shall be same as applicable for the award for recognition.

3. Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required shall invariably result in stoppage of admission to the

concerned Postgraduate Courses.

[No. U-12012/92/2019-ME-I/FTS-3204209]

P. K. BANDYOPADHYAY, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 1 अ ैल, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 697

697

697.—भारतीय आयु@वAान प3रषद अिधिनयम,1956(1956 का 102) क( धारा 11 क( उप-धारा (2) ारा

दC त शिD तय! का योग करते Eए के: % सरकार, भारतीय आयु@वAान प3रषद से परामश0 करके उ अिधिनयम क( थम

अनुसूची म$, िनGिलिखत, और संशोधन करती है:-

उ थम अनुसूची म$:-

क) ‘मा:यता ाJ आयु@वAान अह0ता’शीष0क के अधीन [िजसे इसके आगे कालम(2) कहा गया है] “आय0भ` नॉलेज

कहा गया है] से संबंिधत िविO के संबंध म$ िनGिलिखत अंत:थािपत कया जाएगा. अथा0त्:-

(2)

(3)

“डॉDटर ऑफ मेिडिसन (जनरल मेिडिसन)”

एमडी (जनरल मेिडिसन)

(यह एक मा:यता ाJ आयु@वAान अह0ता होगी जब यह mी

n णा मेिडकल कॉलेज, मुजफरनगर म$ 2016 को या बाद म$

िशि1त कए गए छात के संबंध म$ आय0भ` नॉलेज

िवMिवNालय, पटना ारा द होगी।)

नोट:

नवीकरण करवाना होगा।

2. मा:यता के ‘नवीकरण’ क( jया वही होगी जो मा:यता दान करने के िलए लागू होती है।

lातकोर कोस0 म$ वेश बंद हो जाएगा।

[सं. यू-12012/85/2019-एमई -I/एफटीएस-3203849]

पी. के. बंदोपाcयाय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1st April, 2019

S.O. 697.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical

Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes

the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

In the said Schedule-

I) against “Aryabhatta Knowledge University, Patna”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical Qualification’

[hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for

Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:-

2774

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 11, 2019/VAISAKHA 21, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(2)

(3)

"Doctor of Medicine (General Medicine)”

MD (General Medicine)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when

granted by Aryabhatta Knowledge University, Patna in

respect of students being trained as Sri Krishna Medical

College, Muzzaffarpur on or after (2016).

Note:

1. The recognition so granted shall be for a maximum period of 5 years from the date of notification, upon which it

shall have to be renewed.

2. The procedure for ‘Renewal’ of recognition shall be same as applicable for the award for recognition.

3. Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required shall invariably result in stoppage of admission to the

concerned Postgraduate Courses.

[No. U-12012/85/2019-ME-I/FTS-3203849]

P. K. BANDYOPADHYAY, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 1 अ ैल, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 698

698

698.—भारतीय आयु@वAान प3रषद् अिधिनयम,1956 (1956 का 102) क( धारा 11 क( उप- धारा (2)

थम अनुसूची म$, िनGिलिखत, और संशोधन करती है:-

उ थम अनुसूची म$:-

।) मा:यता ाJ आयु@वAान अह0ता’ शीष0क के अधीन [िजसे इसके आगे कालम(2) कहा गया है] “ए.पी. oसह

िवMिवNालय, रीवा” के सामने अंितम िविO के पPात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए संि1िJकरण’ [िजसे इसके आगे कालम(3)

कहा गया है] से संबंिधत िविO के संबंध म$ िनGिलिखत अंत:थािपत कया जाएगा. अथा0त्:-

(2)

(3)

“डॉDटर ऑफ मेिडिसन (एिनिथसीयॉलोजी)”

एमडी (एिनिथसीयॉलोजी)

(यह एक मा:यता ाJ आयु@वAान अह0ता होगी जब यह

fयाम शाह मेिडकल कॉलेज, रीवा म$ 2016 को या बाद म$

िशि1त कए गए छा2! के संबंध म$ ए.पी. oसह

िवMिवNालय, रीवा

ारा द होगी।)

नोट:

नवीकरण करवाना होगा।

2. मा:यता के ‘नवीकरण’ क( jया वही होगी जो मा:यता दान करने के िलए लागू होती है।

lातकोर कोस0 म$ वेश बंद हो जाएगा।

[सं. यू-12012/86/2019-एमई -I/एफटीएस-3203859]

पी. के. बंदोपाcयाय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1st April, 2019

S.O. 698.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical

Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes

the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

In the said Schedule-

I) against “A.P. Singh University, Rewa”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter

referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’

[hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:-

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 11] 2019@oS'kk[k 21] 1941

2775

(2)

(3)

“Doctor of Medicine (Anaesthesiology)”

MD (Anaesthesiology)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when

granted by A.P. Singh University, Rewa in respect of

students being trained at Shyam Shah Medical College,

Rewa on or after 2016).

Note:

1. The recognition so granted shall be for a maximum period of 5 years from the date of notification, upon which it shall

have to be renewed.

2. The procedure for ‘Renewal’ of recognition shall be same as applicable for the award for recognition.

3. Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required shall invariably result in stoppage of admission to the

concerned Postgraduate Courses.

[No. U-12012/86/2019-ME-I/FTS-3203859]

P. K. BANDYOPADHYAY, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 1 अ ैल, 2019

का

का.आ.

.आ.

.आ. 699

699

699.—भारतीय आयुवान परषद् अिधिनयम,1956(1956 का 102) क धारा 11 क उप-

धारा (2) ारा द त शि" तय# का योग करते &ए के( ) सरकार, भारतीय आयुवान परषद् से परामश, करके

उ- अिधिनयम क थम अनुसूची म2, िन3िलिखत, और संशोधन करती है:-

उ थम अनुसूची म$:-

।) ‘मा:यता ाJ आयु@वAान अह0ता’शीष0क के अधीन [िजसे इसके आगे कालम (2) कहा गया है] “डॉ.एन.टी.आर. वाdय

िवAान िवMिवNालय, िवजयवाड़ा” के सामने अंितम िविO के पPात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए संि1िJकरण’ [िजसे इसके आगे

कालम(3) कहा गया है] से संबंिधत िविO के संबंध म$ िनGिलिखत अंत:थािपत कया जाएगा. अथा0त्:-

(2)

(3)

“डॉDटर ऑफ मेिडिसन (फिज़यॉलोजी)”

एमडी (फिज़यॉलोजी)

(यह एक मा:यता ाJ आयु@वAान अह0ता होगी जब यह

भाकर मेिडकल कॉलेज, य$कापली म$ 2018 को या बाद म$

िशि1त कए गए छा2! के संबंध म$ डॉ.एन.टी.आर.

वाdय िवAान िवMिवNालय, िवजयवाड़ा ारा द

होगी।)

नोट:

नवीकरण करवाना होगा।

2. मा:यता के ‘नवीकरण’ क( jया वही होगी जो मा:यता दान करने के िलए लागू होती है।

lातकोर कोस0 म$ वेश बंद हो जाएगा।

[सं. यू-12012/87/2019-एमई - I/एफटीएस-3203869]

पी. के. बंदोपायाय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1st April, 2019

S.O. 699.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical

Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes

the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

In the said Schedule :-

2776

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 11, 2019/VAISAKHA 21, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

I) against “Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical

Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading

‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(2)

(3)

“Doctor of Medicine (Physiology)”

MD (Physiology)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when

granted by Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences,

Vijayawada in respect of students being trained at

Bhaskar Medical College, Yenkapally on or after 2018).

Note:

1. The recognition so granted shall be for a maximum period of 5 years from the date of notification,

upon which it shall have to be renewed.

2. The procedure for ‘Renewal’ of recognition shall be same as applicable for the award for recognition.

3. Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required shall invariably result in stoppage of

admission to the concerned Postgraduate Courses.

[No. U-12012/87/2019-ME-I/FTS-3203869]

P. K. BANDYOPADHYAY, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 1 अ ैल, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 700

700

700.—भारतीय आयु@वAान प3रषद् अिधिनयम,1956(1956 का 102) क( धारा 11 क( उप- धारा (2)

थम अनुसूची म$, िनGिलिखत, और संशोधन करती है:-

उ थम अनुसूची म$:-

।) ‘मा:यता ाJ आयु@वAान अह0ता’शीष0क के अधीन [िजसे इसके आगे कालम (2) कहा गया है] “राजथान वाdय

िवAान िवMिवNालय, जयपुर” के सामने अंितम िविO के पPात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए संि1िJकरण’ [िजसे इसके आगे

कालम(3) कहा गया है] से संबंिधत िविO के संबंध म$ िनGिलिखत अंत:थािपत कया जाएगा. अथा0त्:-

(2)

(3)

“डॉDटर ऑफ मेिडिसन (इqयुनो हेमाटॉलोजी एंड Vलड

Wांसrयूज़न)”

एमडी(इqयुनो हेमाटॉलोजी एंड Vलड Wांसrयूज़न)

(यह एक मा:यता ाJ आयु@वAान अह0ता होगी जब यह

एसएमएस मेिडकल कॉलेज, जयपुर म$ 2018 को या

बाद म$ िशि1त कए गए छा2! के संबंध म$ राजथान

वाdय िवAान िवMिवNालय, जयपुर ारा द

होगी।)

नोट:

नवीकरण करवाना होगा।

2. मा:यता के ‘नवीकरण’ क( jया वही होगी जो मा:यता दान करने के िलए लागू होती है।

lातकोर कोस0 म$ वेश बंद हो जाएगा।

[सं. यू-12012/89/2019-एमई-I/एफटीएस-3203975]

पी. के. बंदोपाcयाय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1st April, 2019

S.O. 700.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical

Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes

the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

In the said Schedule :-

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 11] 2019@oS'kk[k 21] 1941

2777

I) against “Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical

Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading

‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(2)

(3)

“Doctor of Medicine (Immuno Haematology &

MD (Immuno Haematology & Blood

Blood Transfusion)

Transfusion)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when

granted by Rajasthan University of Health Sciences,

Jaipur in respect of students being trained at SMS

Medical College, Jaipur on or after 2018).

Note:

1. The recognition so granted shall be for a maximum period of 5 years from the date of notification, upon which it

shall have to be renewed.

2. The procedure for ‘Renewal’ of recognition shall be same as applicable for the award for recognition.

3. Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required shall invariably result in stoppage of admission to the

concerned Postgraduate Courses.

[No. U-12012/89/2019-ME-I/FTS -3203975]

P. K. BANDYOPADHYAY, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 1 अ ैल, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 701

701

701.—भारतीय आयु@वAान प3रषद् अिधिनयम,1956 (1956 का 102) क( धारा 11 क(

उप- धारा (2) ारा दC त शिD तय! का योग करते Eए के: % सरकार, भारतीय आयु@वAान प3रषद् से परामश0 करके उ

अिधिनयम क( थम अनुसूची म$, िनGिलिखत, और संशोधन करती है:-

उ थम अनुसूची म$-

।) ‘मा:यता ाJ आयु@वAान अह0ता’शीष0क के अधीन[िजसे इसके आगे कालम(2) कहा गया है] “एनआईएमएस

िवMिवNालय, जयपुर” के सामने अंितम िविO के पPात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए संि1िJकरण’ [िजसे इसके आगे कालम (3)

कहा गया है] से संबंिधत िविO के संबंध म$ िनGिलिखत अंत:थािपत कया जाएगा. अथा0त्:-

(2)

(3)

“मिजटर िच5गs (:यूरो सज0री)”

एमसीएच(:यूरो सज0री)

(यह एक मा:यता ाJ आयु@वAान अह0ता होगी जब यह

नेशनल इंटीtूट मेिडकल सांइिसस एंड 3रसच0, जयपुर

राजथान म$ 2018 को या बाद म$ िशि1त कए गए छा2!

के संबंध म$ एनआईएमएस िवMिवNालय, जयपुर ारा

द होगी।)

नोट:

नवीकरण करवाना होगा।

2. मा:यता के ‘नवीकरण’ क( jया वही होगी जो मा:यता दान करने के िलए लागू होती है।

lातकोर कोस0 म$ वेश बंद हो जाएगा।

[सं. यू-12012/90/2019-एमई-I/एफटीएस-3203976]

पी. के. बंदोपाcयाय, अवर सिचव

2778

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 11, 2019/VAISAKHA 21, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 1st April, 2019

S.O. 701.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical

Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes

the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

In the said Schedule :-

I) against “NIMS University, Jaipur”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as

column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter

referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(2)

(3)

“Magister Chirurgiae (Neuro Surgery)”

M.Ch (Neuro Surgery)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when

granted by NIMS University, Jaipur in respect of students

being trained at National Institute of Medical Science &

Research, Jaipur, Rajasthan on or after 2018).

Note:

1. The recognition so granted shall be for a maximum period of 5 years from the date of notification, upon which it shall

have to be renewed.

2. The procedure for ‘Renewal’ of recognition shall be same as applicable for the award for recognition.

3. Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required shall invariably result in stoppage of admission to the

concerned Postgraduate Courses.

[No. U-12012/90/2019-ME-I/FTS -3203976]

P. K. BANDYOPADHYAY, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 1 अ ैल, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 702

702

702.—भारतीय आयु@वAान प3रषद् अिधिनयम, 1956(1956 का 102) क( धारा 11 क( उप- धारा (2)

थम अनुसूची म$, िनGिलिखत, और संशोधन करती है:-

उ थम अनुसूची म$-

।) ‘मा:यता ाJ आयु@वAान अह0ता’ शीष0क के अधीन [िजसे इसके आगे कालम (2) कहा गया है] “पिPम बंगाल

वाdय िवAान िवMिवNालय, कोलकाता” के सामने अंितम िविO के पPात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए संि1िJकरण’ [िजसे

इसके आगे कालम(3) कहा गया है] से संबंिधत िविO के संबंध म$ िनGिलिखत अंत:थािपत कया जाएगा. अथा0त्:-

(2)

(3)

“माटर ऑफ सज0री (ऑrथॉलमॉलोजी)”

एमएस(ऑrथॉलमॉलोजी)

(यह एक मा:यता ाJ आयु@वAान अह0ता होगी जब यह

िमदनापुर मेिडकल कॉलेज, िमदनापुर म$ 2016 को या बाद

म$ िशि1त कए गए छा2! के संबंध म$ पिPम बंगाल

वाdय िवAान िवMिवNालय, कोलकाता ारा द

होगी।)

नोट:

नवीकरण करवाना होगा।

2. मा:यता के ‘नवीकरण’ क( jया वही होगी जो मा:यता दान करने के िलए लागू होती है।

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 11] 2019@oS'kk[k 21] 1941

2779

^{3. अपेि1त मा:यता का समय से नवीकरण करवाने म$ िवफल रहने पर,}^{प3रणामव5प,}^{िनरपवाद 5प से}^{, संबंिधत}

lातकोर कोस0 म$ वेश बंद हो जाएगा।

[सं. यू-12012/88/2019-एमई-I/एफटीएस-3203974]

पी. के. बंदोपाcयाय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1st April, 2019

S.O. 702.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical

Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes

the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

In the said Schedule-

against “West Bengal University of Health Sciences, Kolkata”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical

Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading

‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(2)

(3)

“Master of Surgery (Ophthalmology)”

MS (Ophthalmology)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when

granted by West Bengal University of Health Sciences,

Kolkata in respect of students being trained at Midnapore

Medical College, Midnapore. on or after 2016).

Note:

1. The recognition so granted shall be for a maximum period of 5 years from the date of notification, upon which it

shall have to be renewed.

2. The procedure for ‘Renewal’ of recognition shall be same as applicable for the award for recognition.

3. Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required shall invariably result in stoppage of admission to the

concerned Postgraduate Courses.

[No. U-12012/88/2019-ME-I/FTS -3203974]

P. K. BANDYOPADHYAY, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 1 अ ैल, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 703

703

703.—भारतीय आयु@वAान प3रषद् अिधिनयम,1956(1956 का 102) क( धारा 11 क( उप-धारा (2)

थम अनुसूची म$, िनGिलिखत, और संशोधन करती है:-

उ थम अनुसूची म$:-

‘मा:यता ाJ आयु@वAान अह0ता’ शीष0क के अधीन [िजसे इसके आगे कालम (2) कहा गया है] “राजीव गांधी वाdय

िवAान िवMिवNालय, ब$गलु5” के सामने अंितम िविO के पPात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए संि1िJकरण’ [िजसे इसके आगे

कालम(3) कहा गया है] से संबंिधत िविO के संबंध म$ िनGिलिखत अंत:थािपत कया जाएगा. अथा0त्:-

(2)

(3)

“िडSलोमा इन रेिडयो डॉयgोिसस”

डीएमआरडी

(यह एक मा:यता ाJ आयु@वAान अह0ता होगी जब यह

िवजयनगर इंटीtूट ऑफ मेिडकल सांइिसस, बेलारी,

कना0टक म$ िशि1त कए जा रहे छा2! और 2017-18

2780

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 11, 2019/VAISAKHA 21, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

तक के बैच म$ वेश पाए छा2! के संबंध म$ राजीव गांधी

वाdय िवAान िवMिवNालय, ब$गलु5 ारा द

होगी।)

[सं. यू-12012/96/2019-एमई-I/एफटीएस-3204253]

पी. के. बंदोपाcयाय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1st April, 2019

S.O. 703.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical

Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes

the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

In the said Schedule :-

against “Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical

Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading

‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(2)

(3)

“Diploma in Radio-Diagnosis”

DMRD

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when

granted by Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences,

Bangalore in respect of students being trained at

Vijaynagar Institute of Medical Sciences, Bellary,

Karnataka and students admitted upto the batches

2017-18).

[No. U-12012/96/2019-ME-I/FTS -3204253]

P. K. BANDYOPADHYAY, Under Secy.

पैोिलयम और ाकृितक गैस मंालय

नई द ली, 8 मई, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 704

704

704.—क$%ीय सरकार, पेWोिलयम और खिनज पाइपलाईन (भूिम म$ उपयोग के अिधकार का अज0न)

अिधिनयम, 1962 (1962 का 50) क( धारा 2 के खंड (क) के अनुसरण म$ उर देश रा)य 1े2 के भीतर उ अिधिनयम के

अधीन भारत पेWोिलयम कापuरेशन िलिमटेड (बीपीसीएल) क( िबना - पनक( पाइपलाइन प3रयोजना के स1म ािधकारी के

कृCय! का पालन करने के िलए अित3र भार पर mी ेम नारायण oसह,िडSटी कलेDटर,कानपुर, उर देश को भारत

पेWोिलयम कॉपोरेशन िलिमटेड म$ ािधकृत करती है।

यह अिधसूचना जारी होने क( तारीख से लागू होगी।

[फा. सं. आर–11025(15)/3/2019–ओ आर-I/ई–29921]

शा:तनु धर, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019

S.O. 704.—In pursuance of clause (a) of Section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of

Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government herby authorizes Shri. Prem Narayan Singh,

Deputy Collector, Kanpur, U.P on additional charge to Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd. (BPCL) to perform the functions of

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 11] 2019@oS'kk[k 21] 1941

2781

^{Competent Authority(s) in the State of Uttar Pradesh for Bina-Panki pipeline project of M/s Bharat Petroleum}

Corporation Ltd. under the said Act.

This notification will be effective from the date of its issue.

[F. No. R-11025(15)/3/2019-OR-I/E-29921]

SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.

वािण य एवं उ#ोग मंालय

(वािणय िवभाग)

नई द ली, 2 मई, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 705

705

705.—के:%ीय सरकार, िनया0त (गुणवा िनयं2ण एंव िनरी1ण) िनयम, 1964 के िनयम 12, के उपिनयम

(2) के साथ प3ठत, िनया0त (गुणवा िनयं2ण एंव िनरी1ण) अिधिनयम, 1963 (1963 का 22) क( धारा 7 क( उपधारा (1)

ारा द शि य! का योग करते Eए, मैसस0 िम2ा एस.के. ाइवेट िलिमटेड, ार संया : 8-45-9/2/1, B.C िवcया नगर

कॉलोनी, चौथी गली, िनकट (ओड) सी बी आई डाउन, िवशाखापxनम - 530003 को इस अिधसूचना के राजप2 म$

काशन क( तारीख से तीन वष0 क( अविध के िलए-

(क) खिनज और अय क – समूह 1, अथा0त, लौह अयक, मyगनीज अयक, फेरोमyगनीज तथा बाDसाइट; और

(ख) खिनज और अय क – समूह 2, अथा0त, jोम कंस:Wेट सिहत jोम अयक,

भारत सरकार के वािण)य मं2ालय क( शासक(य राजप2 म$ कािशत, दनांक 20 दसqबर, 1965 क( अिधसूचना सं॰

का.आ. 3975 तथा दनांक 20 दसqबर, 1965 क( अिधसूचना सं॰ का.आ. 3978 के तहत कािशत अिधसूचना म$ उपाबz

अनुसूिचय! म$ िविन{दO jमश: उ खिनज और अयक का िवशाखापxनम एवं गंगावरम पन म$ िनया0त से पूव0 िनरी1ण

करने के िलए िनGिलिखत शत| के अधीन एक अिभकरण के }प म$ मा:यता देती है, अथा0त् :

(i)

यह अिभकरण, खिनज और अयक समूह-। के िनया0त (िनरी1ण) िनयम, 1965 तथा खिनज और अयक

समूह-।। के िनया0त (िनरी1ण) िनयम, 1965 के िनयम 4 के अधीन िनरी1ण क( पzित क( जाँच करने के िलये िनया0त

िनरी1ण प3रषद् ारा िनिम नामिन{दO अिधका3रय! को पया0J सुिवधाएं देगी; और

(ii) यह अिभकरण, इस अिधसूचना के अधीन अपने कायu के पालन म$ िनदेशक (िनरी1ण और गुणवा िनयं2ण)

िनया0त िनरी1ण प3रषद ारा समय-समय पर, िलिखत 5प म$, दए गए ऐसे िनदश! से आबz ह!गी ।

[फा. सं. के-16014/3/2019-िनया0त िनरी1ण]

संतोष कुमार सारंगी, संयु सिचव (िनया0त िनरी1ण िवभाग)

MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY

(Department of Commerce)

New Delhi, the 2nd May, 2019

S.O. 705.—In exercise of the powers conferred by the sub-section (1) of section 7 of the Export (Quality Control

and Inspection) Act, 1963 (22 of 1963), read with sub-rule (2) of rule 12 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection)

Rules, 1964, the Central Government hereby recognizes M/s Mitra S.K. Private Limited, Door no. 8-45-9/2/1/ B.C

Vidyanagar Colony, 4^th Lane, Near Old CBI Down, Visakhapatnam – 530003, as an agency for a period of three years

from the date of publication of this notification, for the inspection of-

(a) Minerals and Ores-Group I, namely the Iron Ore, Manganese Ore, Ferromanganese and Bauxite ; and

(b) Minerals and Ores-Group II, namely the Chrome Ore including Chrome Concentrate;

as specified in the Schedule annexed to the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Commerce,

published in the official Gazette vide number S.O. 3975, dated the 20^th December, 1965, and S.O. 3978, dated the

2782

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 11, 2019/VAISAKHA 21, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

²⁰^th^{December, 1965 respectively, prior to export of the said Minerals and Ores at Visakhapatnam and Gangavaram}

Ports, subject to the following conditions, namely: -

(i)

the said agency shall give adequate facilities to the officers nominated by the Export Inspection Council in this

behalf to carry out the inspection specified under rule 4 of the Export of Minerals and Ores - Group I (Inspection)

Rules, 1965 and Export of Minerals and Ores - Group II (Inspection) Rules, 1965;

(ii)

the said agency shall, in performance of its function as specified in this notification shall be bound by such

directions, as the Director (Inspection and Quality Control), Export Inspection Council, may give in writing from

time to time.

[F. No. K-16014/3/2019 - Export Inspection]

SANTOSH KUMAR SARANGI, Jt. Secy. (Export Inspection Division)

िव

िव#ु#ु#ु#ुत मंालय

मंालय

नई द ली, 6 मई, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 706

706

706.—के:%ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासक(य योजन! के िलए योग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10, के

उपिनयम (4) के अनुसरण म$ िवदधुत मं2ालय के शासिनक िनयं2ाधीन राn Wीय िवदधुत िश1ण ितn ठान के जल िवदधुत

िश1ण क$%, नंगल पंजाब िजसके 80 ितशत कम0चारीवृंद ने oहदी का काय0साधक Aान ाS त कर िलया है, को एतदारा

अिधसूिचत करती है ।

[सं. 11011/9/2017-oहदी]

राज पाल, आ@थक सलाहकार

MINISTRY OF POWER

New Delhi, the 6th May, 2019

S.O. 706.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the

Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notify the Hydro Power Training Centre, Nangal, Punjab of

National Power Training Institute under the administrative control of Ministry of Power, where 80% of the staff have

acquired working knowledge of Hindi.

[No. 11011/9/2017-Hindi]

RAJ PAL, Economic Adviser

Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=ky;

नई द ली, 1 मई, 2019

dk-avk- 707.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ

,;j bafM;k lsVl ,;jiksVZ fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ,ukZdqye ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k% 7@2015) dks izdkf”kr djrh

gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 28@04@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&20013@02@2019-vkbZ- vkj- (lh&1)

,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 1st May, 2019

S.O. 707.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Earnakulam

(Ref. No. 7/2015) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 11] 2019@oS'kk[k 21] 1941

2783

^{management of M/s. Air India Sats Airport Services Pvt. Ltd.}^{Limited and their workmen, which was received by the}

Central Government on 28.04.2019.

[No. L-20013/02/2019-IR(CM-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

ERNAKULAM

Present: Shri. V.Vijaya Kumar, B. Sc., LLM, Presiding Officer

(Thursday the 7^thday of March, 2019)

ID No. 7/2015

Workman :

Sri. Sunil S, T.C No 71/1358,

Shajan House, Valiyathura,

Vallakkadavu PO,

Thiruvananthapuram 695008.

By M/s Karukapadath Associates

Management:

Air India Sats Airport Services Pvt. Ltd.

Air India Building, Vellayambalam,

Thiruvananthapuram – 695010.

By Adv, R Lakshmana Iyer & Adv.T L Sreeram.

AWARD

The case came up for final hearing on 07.03.2019 and this Tribunal cum Labour Court on the same day passed the

following:

1. The workman filed this petition under Section 2(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 with the prayer for

setting aside the order of dismissal dated 22.06.2014 and pass consequential ordersfor re-instating the

workman in service with all consequential benefits.

2. According to the petitioner he was appointed by the management as Ramp-Handi man with effect from July

2011 and continued to work with them till 22.06.2014. On 22.06.2014 he was prevented from discharging his

duties stating that he is dismissed from service. The case of the petitioner is that the order of dismissal without

even conducting a disciplinary inquiry is illegal and contrary to settled law.

3. The case of the management is that the workman was appointed on a fixed term contract from 29.06.2011 for a

period of 3 years. On completion of 3 years term, the employer- employee relationship ceased to exist. Some

action was initiated against the petitioner for unauthorised absence. In the meantime, on 28.06.2014 the fix

term contract of engagement of the workman stood expired and thereafter his engagement ceased to exist.

4. The petitioner workman filed certain documents and proof affidavit. However he failed to come forward to

give evidence. There was no representation for the petitioner when the matter is posted for evidence and hence

the petitioner is called absent and set exparte. There was no representation for the management also for the

last two postings and the management is also called absent and setex parte.

5. It is felt that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter and hence an award is passed dismissing

the claim.

The award will come into force one month after its publication in the Official Gazette.

Dictated to the Assistant, transcribed and typed by him and corrected and passed by me on this 07^th day of

March, 2019.

V. VIJAYA KUMAR, Presiding Officer

Appendix : Nil.

2784

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 11, 2019/VAISAKHA 21, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नई द ली, 1 मई, 2019

dk-avk- 708.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj

eSllZ ओ.एन.जी.सी. fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; अहमदाबाद ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 641@2004) dks izdkf”kr

djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 28@04@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&20040@49@1995&vkbZ- vkj- (lh&1]

,e- ds- flag, vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 1st May, 2019

S.O. 708.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Ahmedabad

(Ref. No. 641/2004) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. ONGC Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 28.04.2019.

[No. L-20040/49/1995-IR(C-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 13^th March, 2019

Reference: (CGITA) No. 641/2004

The Officer on Special Duty, (Projects),

ONGC Ltd., Gandhar Project,

Ankleshwar (Gujarat)

…First Party

V/s.

Late Solanki Balvantbhai Devjibhai,

Legal Heir Akash Gohil

At and Post Sisodra, Tal. Ankleshwar,

Bharuch (Gujarat) - 394810

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri C.S. Naidu

For the Second Party : Shri Prabhatsinh Parmar

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-20040/49/95–IR(C-

I) dated 03.09.1996 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of

the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether Shri Solanki Balvantbhai Devjibhai is justified in claiming that he was an employee of Oil and

Natural Gas Commission, Now Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., Gandhar Project, Ankleshwar and that

his services were illegally terminated w.e.f. 03.03.1992? If so, to what relief the said workman is entitled and

from which date?”

1. The reference dates back to 03.09.1996 and received on 19.09.1996 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,

New Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.

2. After issuing notice to the parties, second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 3 on 29.11.1996 and the

first party ONGC Ltd. submitted the written statement Ex. 15 on 25.01.2001.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 11] 2019@oS'kk[k 21] 1941

2785

3. The second party workman Solanki Balvantbhai Devjibhai in his statement of claim Ex. 3 has alleged that he

had been working as Khalasi in Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., hereinafter referred to as ‘ONGC’ in a

high risk zone required and having special skills at high pressure oil wells. He used to work near the opening of

the mouth of wells where a special type of oil valve known as Christmas Tree Valve are installed. The place of

section in which he used to work is known as Exploration Business Group (EBG) logging reservoir section. He

used to work for 12 hours a day; sometimes he was required to work for 24 hours or even for 48 hours

continuously. He worked with fullest of efficiency, zeal, skill, responsibility and devotion but unfortunately, his

services were terminated w.e.f. 03.03.1992 without giving reasons. He had been serving under direct guidance

and supervision of ONGC but was wrongly treated as a contract labour while if-so-facto he had never been a

contract labour as per the ingredients of Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, hereinafter

referred to as ‘Act’, because while engaged by the ONGC, he never obtained any licence for contract under the

said Act nor the ONGC sanctioned him any contract to do contract work. The true facts were that the work was

of a highly perennial nature and without performing the nature of his work, the exploration of oils from the oil

wells were impossible. The extracted crude oil from the oil wells which he used to do was the essential business

and monopoly of business of ONGC. He has further alleged that after termination of his service, the ONGC

immediately thereafter on 03.03.1992 engaged fresh workmen with a monthly wages of Rs.887/- per month.

The details of the workmen engaged after his termination are as under:

Serial No.

Name

Place of Residence

Sajid Usmangani

Hansot

Yadav Indrajit S.

Ankleshwar

S.C. Garbee

ONGC Colony

Madanlal

Bhatha

Jahir Hamid Rasul

Telva

Shaikh S.G. Telva

R.B. Hansoti

Sajod

B.J. Patel

Adol

Jitendrasing Ravat

ONGC Colony

Ashwin Rana

Bharuch

Indrajit

Bharuch

Ashok

ONGC Colony

Basir Shaikh

Kapalsadi

Thus the termination of his service was being in violation of the provisions of Section 25 F, G and H of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, therefore, null and void. He has further alleged that the first party has devised a

peculiar system of giving employment to the workmen by making minor changes in their names in the manner

like Solanki Bachubhai D., Solanki Bansibhai D. and Solanki Bhanu D. The intention of the ONGC was only to

deprive the workman the benefits of continuous of service. The workman worked for more than 240 days and

was entitled for automatic permanent status after the completion of 180 days as provided in the certified

standing order for contingent employee of ONGC. He has further alleged that he was being paid consolidated

pay of Rs.870/- per month instead of regular pay scale of Khalasi being as 1156-25-1306-30-1456-35-1526.

Thus he has prayed for declaring his termination of service as illegal, reinstatement with full back wages

declaring him as permanent employee and any other relief as the Tribunal deems fit along with Rs.5000/- as

expenses of the reference.

4. The first party ONGC in the written statement Ex. 15 submitted that the workman was not a permanent

employee and he was a contingent employee, the services of which were governed by certified standing orders

known as “Certified Standing Orders for Contingent Employees of ONGC”, therefore, the workman being a

contingent employees does not deserve the reliefs sought by him in his statement of claim.

5. The workman vide list Ex. 16 and Ex. 17 submitted the documents like Identity Cards showing him as

contingent labour from 10.07.1991 to 30.07.1991, 04.04.1991 to 30.06.1991 and 23.07.1991 to 21.10.1991,

summery of attendance from November 1990 to March 1992, type of wells where he worked etc. The second

2786

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 11, 2019/VAISAKHA 21, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

party workman also submitted the copies of the office order regarding certified standing orders known as

“Certified Standing Orders for Contingent Employees of ONGC”.

6. The first party vide list Ex. 27 submitted the zerox copies of contingent bills of 01.06.1991 and 30.04.1992

showing that the expenditure involved in the payment of wages to the contingent workmen, casual labourers

shall be met out of the budget under the relevant head of account.

7. The second party workman moved an application Ex. 20 for production of documents detailed in the application

for the just disposal of case but the ONGC by way of affidavit submitted that the documents are not traceable.

8. On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:

i. Whether Shri Solanki Balvantbhai Devjibhai is justified in claiming that he was an employee

of Oil and Natural Gas Commission, Now Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., Gandhar

Project, Ankleshwar and that his services were illegally terminated w.e.f. 03.03.1992?

ii. To what relief, if any, the concerned workman is entitled?

9. Issue No. i and ii: As both the issues are interrelated, therefore, are decided together. The burden of proof of

these issues lies on the second party workman who was examined vide affidavit Ex. 12 reiterating the

averments made in the statement of claim. In his cross-examination, he has stated that he applied by way of

moving an application for job in ONGC but he has not proof of it because it would have been with ONGC. He

did not face interview and was not given any appointment letter from ONGC. It is true that the permanent

workmen of ONGC are used to be issued Identity Cards with the seal and signature of ONGC. He does not

know that the permanent employees of ONGC are used to be given the pay slips every month and in the pay

slips, the provident fund deduction are used to be shown. He admitted that his name was on the contingency of

ONGC and wages are paid accordingly. He was paid the wages by way of vouchers and he was not employed

as a permanent employee of ONGC. He was paid a fixed salary of Rs.887/- per month. He did not work as a

workman of ONGC. He studied up to 12^th standard. The details of pay slips would have been with ONGC. The

ONGC used to obtain the Identity Card for deposition after the completion of work but the work he used to do

was of a permanent nature but was discharged stating that the work has been completed. He has 5 family

members which he used to sustain them.

10. The first party ONGC examined the witness named Ramchandra Devi Reddy vide document Ex. 25 reiterating

the averments made in the written statement and in his cross-examination, he has stated that the work of

retaining any person in job or terminating the job is done by R & P Section of ONGC. This workman never

worked under him. He has no personal knowledge regarding him but he has admitted on the basis of record

that this workman was not engaged through any contractor treating him as a contract worker but he was paid

the wages through vouchers but wage register and muster roll are not being maintained regarding the

contingency labour.

11. I heard the arguments of the advocates of the parties and considered the oral and documentary evidence of the

parties available on the record. From the perusal of the evidence, it is clearly establishes that this workman

worked for 2 years from 06.11.1990 to 03.03.1992 and the Para 14 of Certified Standing Orders for

Contingent Employees of ONGC provides as under:

“(i) For terminating the employment of a workman, notice in writing shall be given in accordance with the

provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 provided that where a temporary workman is not entitled to one

month’s notice under the Industrial Disputes Act, he shall be given at least 7 days’ notice for termination of

employment. Alternatively, wages shall be paid in lieu of notice.

(ii) The services of a workman shall not be terminated as punishment unless he has been given an opportunity

of explaining the charges of misconduct alleged against him in the manner prescribed in Clause 16.

(iii) Where the employment of any workman is terminated, the wages earned by him and other dues, if any shall

be paid before the expiry of the second working days from the day on which his employment is terminated.”

12. The first party witness Ramchandra Devi Reddy has expressed ignorance regarding the service of any such

notice on this workman. He has also expressed ignorance that after the termination of the workman, junior

workmen were not engaged.

13. It is noteworthy that this workman has died of Carcinoma on 17.08.2017 as appears from the documents

submitted by the legal heirs of the workman who have been ordered to be substituted vide application Ex. 35

on 09.04.2018.

14. The Gujarat High Court in SCA No. 3348 of 1988, 1997 (a), Guj. Law Reporter, Page 61, ONGC V/s

Maheshwari Devi, has held that it would be discriminatory to not hold a person completing 180 days of

attendance in a short period of 12 consecutive months would not be entitled for status of a temporary

employee and also would not be entitled to the notice as provided under Clause 1 of the Standing Order No.

14 and such construction of the Standing Order would clearly militate against the right of equality before law

enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution of India and the right of equality in matters relating to employment

as enshrined in Article 16 of the Constitution of India and may have the effect of rendering the Standing Order

itself to be open to challenge under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 11] 2019@oS'kk[k 21] 1941

2787

15. The first party referred M.P. State Agro Industry Development Corporation Ltd. V/s S.C. Pandey, 2006 SC C

(L&S) 434, wherein it has been held that the post of temporary employee by way of recruitment procedure is a

State Instrumentality. He has also referred State of M.P. V/s Arjunlal D., 2006 SC C (L&S) 429, reiterating

the aforesaid law. Both these judgements are not applicable in this case and it is laughable that the advocate of

the first party does not know the basis law. It is a well established law that the procedure of termination if it is

given in the rules of organisation, then that shall be followed. Otherwise also where there has been contract

between the employer and employee regarding which regulations are framed then those regulations must be

obeyed.

16. In the present case, the ONGC framed/issued the Certified Standing Orders for Contingent Employees of

ONGC and the Para 14 of it clearly states that the services of a workman shall not be terminated as a

punishment unless he has been given an opportunity of explaining the charges of misconduct and also a

workman who has completed 180 days in 12 consecutive months shall be considered a temporary workman

and if he has completed 240 days in 12 consecutive months, he shall be considered for conversion as a regular

employee. The workman in this case completed 2 years of service without any break, as the first party witness

expressed ignorance regarding it, therefore, the termination of his service without any notice was illegal and

he was also entitled for regularisation at the time of termination because he was not subjected to any

departmental enquiry for any misconduct. The ONGC has failed to explain as to why he was not regularised.

Thus the workman was entitled for reinstatement without any back wages on the principles of ‘no work no

pay’. However his legal heirs will be entitled for appointment in dying in harness rules if eligible.

17. Thus the issues are decided in the light of the observation made in Para 16. The legal heirs shall be entitled for

back wages from the date of reinstatement till the date of death of the workman at the rate of wages admissible

at that point of time.

18. The legal heirs of the workman may move an application before ONGC for appointment for dying in harness

rules within a month from the publication of the award and the ONGC shall pass order on application within a

month from the date of moving of application.

19. The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

नई द ली, 1 मई, 2019

dk-avk- 709.—vkSn~;ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] (1947 1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

भारतीय टेट बक के izca/krarz ds lc) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkSn~;ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkSn~;ksfxd vf/kdj.k अहमदाबाद ds iapkV lanHkZ la[;k (114@2004) dks izdkf’kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

01@05@2019 izkIr gqvk Fkk 1

[la- ,y&12012@45@98&vkbZ vkj (ch&1)]

ch. ,l. fc’V] अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1st May, 2019

S.O. 709.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 114/2004) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 01/05/2019.

[ No. L-12012/45/98–IR (B-1)]

B.S. BISHT, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 02^nd April, 2019

2788

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 11, 2019/VAISAKHA 21, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Reference: (CGITA) No- 114/2004

The Manager,

State Bank of India, Main Branch, Bhadra,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

…First Party

V/s.

Shri Kishor S. Gupta,

C/o Gujarat Rajya General Kamdar Mazdoor Panchayat,

211, 2^nd Floor, Relief Shopping Centre, Near GPO,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) - 380001

… Second Party

For the First Party : Shri B.K. Oza

For the Second Party : Shri H.B. Mansuri

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12012/45/98–IR(B-I)

dated 23.09.1998 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the

matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India is justified in terminating the services of

Shri Kishor S. Gupta w.e.f. 01.02.1993 and not considering for regular employment is justified? If not what

relief the concerned workman is entitled to?”

The reference dates back to 23.09.1998 and received on 28.09.1998 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,

New Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.

After issuing notice to the parties, the second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 5 on 21.12.1998 and

the first party submitted the written statement Ex. 9 on 05.04.1999. The case was listed for argument.

On 02.04.2019, the second party workman Kishor S. Gupta and the first party State Bank of India, Ahmedabad

submitted the settlement Ex. 23 vide application Ex. 22 stating that the matter has been resolved by way of

onetime payment of Rs.200000/- (Rupees Two Lac) in the favour of second party workman

Kishorbhai S. Gupta vide Bankers Cheque No. 355002 dated 30.03.2019 along with Rs.15000/- (Rupees Fifteen

Thousand) in the favour of Shri H.B. Mansuri, advocate of second party workman vide Bankers Cheque No.

355001 dated 30.03.2019 and nothing has been left for further resolution. The said settlement Ex. 23 is read

over and explained to the parties. They admitted the terms and conditions of the settlement. Therefore, the

settlement Ex. 23 is accepted by the Tribunal.

Thus the reference is disposed of in the light of the settlement Ex. 23. The settlement Ex. 23 shall remain the

part of the award.

The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 ebZ] 2019

dk-vk- 710.—vkSn~;ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

भारतीय टेट बक ds izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkSn~;ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkSn~;ksfxd vf/kdj.k] अहमदाबाद ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 1270@2004) dks izdkf’kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

01@05@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12012@539@98&vkbZ vkj (ch&1)]

ch. ,l. fc’V] अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1st May, 2019

S.O. 710.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1270/2004) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 01/05/2019.

[No. L-12012/539/98–IR (B)-1)]

B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 11] 2019@oS'kk[k 21] 1941

2789

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 08^th April, 2019

Reference: (CGITA) No- 1270/2004

1. The Chief General Manager,

State Bank of India,

7^th Floor, Bhadra, Lal Darwaja,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

2. The Zonal Manager,

State Bank of India,

7^th Floor, Paradise Complex, Sayajigunj,

Baroda (Gujarat) – 394220

3. The Manager,

State Bank of India,

Service Branch, 2^nd Floor, Akshar Complex,

Behind Rang Upavan, Makkaipool,

Surat (Gujarat) – 395001

…First Parties

V/s.

Mr. Champakbhai Devjibhai Umarigar,

New Navsat Street, Village Umara,

Surat (Gujarat) - 395001

…Second Party

For the First Parties : Shri A.B. Gogia

For the Second Party : Shri P.F. Baxi

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12012/539/98–IR

(B-1) dated 22.04.1999 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect

of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the concerned workman Shri Champakbhai Devjibhai Umarigar has put in continuous service in the

Bank as per provisions of Section 25-B?”

And

“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India through its officers in

terminating/discontinuing the services of the workman Shri Champakbhai Devjibhai Umarigar w.e.f.

14.01.1998 on/with the plea of abolition/cancellation of the waiting list of temporary employees is legal,

proper and justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date and what

other directions are necessary in the matter?”

1. The reference dates back to 22.04.1999 and received on 09.06.1999 from Ministry of Labour and Employment, New

Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.

2. After issuing notice to the parties, both the parties submitted their statement of claim and written statement as the

case may be. The case was listed for cross-examination of parties.

3. On 08.04.2019, the second party workman Champakbhai Devjibhai Umarigar and the first party State Bank of India,

Surat and others submitted the settlement Ex. 36 stating that the matter has been resolved by way of onetime

payment of Rs.200000/- (Rupees Two Lac) in the favour of second party workman Champakbhai Devjibhai

Umarigar vide Demand Draft No. 427234 dated 04.04.2019 along with Rs.15000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) in the

favour of Shri P.F. Baxi, advocate of second party workman vide Demand Draft No. 427236 dated 04.04.2019 and

nothing has been left for further resolution. The said settlement Ex. 36 is read over and explained to the parties.

They admitted the terms and conditions of the settlement. Therefore, the settlement Ex. 36 is accepted by the

Tribunal.

4. Thus the reference is disposed of in the light of the settlement Ex. 36. The settlement Ex. 36 shall remain the part of

the award.

5. The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

2790

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 11, 2019/VAISAKHA 21, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 1 ebZ] 2019

dk-avk- 711.—vkSn~;ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

भारतीय टेट बक ds izca/krarz ds lc) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkSn~;ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkSn~;ksfxd vf/kdj.k] अहमदाबाद ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 1371@2004) dks izdkf’kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

01@05@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12012@121@2001&vkbZ vkj (ch&1)]

ch. ,l. fc’V] अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1st May, 2019

S.O. 711.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1371/2004) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 01/05/2019.

[No. L-12012/121/2001–IR (B-1)]

B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 08^th April, 2019

Reference: (CGITA) No. 1371/2004

The Chief General Manager,

State Bank of India, L.H.O.,

Bhadra, Lal Darwaja, Ahmedabad

The Regional Manager,

State Bank of India,Paradise Complex, Sayajigunj,

Baroda – 390005

The Manager,

State Bank of India,

Timalya Wad Branch, Timalya Wad,

Surat (Gujarat)

The Manager,

State Bank of India,

Service Branch, Second Floor,

Akshar Complex, Behind Rang Upuvan,

Nanpura, Makaipul,

Surat (Gujarat) - 395003

…First Party

V/s.

Shri Dineshchandra Manilal Maisuriya,

Suthar Falia, at & Post Amari, Taluka,

Navsari (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Parties : Shri A.B. Gogia

For the Second Party : Shri P.F. Baxi

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12012/121/2001-

IR(B-I) dated 16.10.2001 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the concerned workman Shri Dineshchandra Manilal Maisuriya has put in ‘continuous service’ in

the bank as per provisions of Section 25-B? If so, whether the action of the management of State Bank of

India, Ahmedabad through its officers in terminating the services of the workman Shri Dineshchandra Manilal

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 11] 2019@oS'kk[k 21] 1941

2791

Maisuriya w.e.f. 31.01.1997 with the plea of abolition/cancellation of the waiting list of temporary employees

is justified? If not, what relief the concerned workman is entitled?”

1. The reference dates back to 16.10.2001 and received on 01.11.2001 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,

New Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.

2. After issuing notice to the parties, both the parties submitted their statement of claim and written statement as the

case may be. The case was listed for evidence of the second party.

3. The case was dismissed on 15.02.2017 in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman. The second

party workman moved an application for restoration vide Misc. Application (CGITA) No. 28/2017 which is

allowed on 08.04.2019 and the reference is restored to its original number.

4. On 08.04.2019, the second party workman Dineshchandra Manilal Maisuriya and the first party State Bank of

India, Surat and others submitted the settlement Ex. 29 stating that the matter has been resolved by way of onetime

payment of Rs.200000/- (Rupees Two Lac) in the favour of second party workman Dineshchandra Manilal

Maisuriya vide Demand Draft No. 774198 dated 05.04.2019 along with Rs.15000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) in

the favour of Shri P.F. Baxi, advocate of second party workman vide Demand Draft No. 774195 dated 05.04.2019

and nothing has been left for further resolution. The said settlement Ex. 29 is read over and explained to the

parties. They admitted the terms and conditions of the settlement. Therefore, the settlement Ex. 29 is accepted by

the Tribunal.

5. Thus the reference is disposed of in the light of the settlement Ex. 29. The settlement Ex. 29 shall remain the part

of the award.

6. The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 ebZ] 2019

dk-avk- 712.—vkSn~;ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

भारतीय टेट बक ds izca/krarz ds lc) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkSn~;ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkSn~;ksfxd vf/kdj.k] अहमदाबाद ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 150@2004) dks izdkf’kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

01@05@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12012@187@98&vkbZ vkj (ch-1)]

ch. ,l. fc’V] अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1st May, 2019

S.O. 712.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 150/2004) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 01/05/2019.

[No. L-12012/187/98–IR (B)-1)]

B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 02^nd April, 2019

Reference: (CGITA) No- 150/2004

The Assistant General Manager,

State Bank of India,

Office Manager’s Department, Local Head Office, Post Box No. 300,

Bhadra, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

The Branch Manager,

State Bank of India, Branch Office, Bhadra,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

2792

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 11, 2019/VAISAKHA 21, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

The Chief General Manager,

State Bank of India, Local Head Office, Bhadra,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

…First Parties

V/s.

Mr. Kantibhai S. Parmar,

Jaj Keshv Ni Chawl, Behind Nutah Mill,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) - 380001

…Second Party

For the First Parties : Shri B.K. Oza

For the Second Party : Shri Prabhatsinh Parmar

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12012/187/98–

IR(B-I) dated 13.01.1999 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India is justified in terminating the services of

Shri Kantibhai Somabhai Parmar by way of retrenchment vide order dated 19.11.1997 just after 3 months of

settlement dated 05.08.1997 for reinstatement? If not, what relief the concerned workman is entitled to?”

1. The reference dates back to 13.01.1999 and received on 21.01.1999 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,

New Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.

2. After issuing notice to the parties, the second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 5 on 15.12.1999 and the

first party submitted the written statement Ex. 6 on 13.11.2000. The case was listed for argument.

3. On 02.04.2019, the second party workman Kantilal S. Parmar and the first party State Bank of India, Ahmedabad

and others submitted the settlement Ex. 53 stating that the matter has been resolved by way of onetime payment of

Rs.175000/- (Rupees One Lac Seventy Five Thousand) in the favour of second party workman Kantilal S. Parmar

vide Bankers Cheque No. 759946 dated 26.03.2019 along with Rs.15000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) in the favour

of Shri Prabhatsinh Parmar, advocate of second party workman vide Bankers Cheque No. 759945 dated 26.03.2019

and nothing has been left for further resolution. The said settlement Ex. 53 is read over and explained to the parties.

They admitted the terms and conditions of the settlement. Therefore, the settlement Ex. 53 is accepted by the

Tribunal.

4. Thus the reference is disposed of in the light of the settlement Ex. 53. The settlement Ex. 53 shall remain the part of

the award.

5. The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 ebZ] 2019

dk-avk- 713.—vkSn~;ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

भारतीय टेट बक ds izca/krarz ds lc) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkSn~;ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkSn~;ksfxd vf/kdj.k] अहमदाबाद ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 1272@2004) dks izdkf’kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

01@05@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12012@11@99&vkbZ vkj (ch-1)]

ch. ,l. fc’V] अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1st May, 2019

S.O. 713.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1272/2004) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 01/05/2019.

[No. L-12012/11/99–IR (B-1)]

B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 11] 2019@oS'kk[k 21] 1941

2793

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 08^th April, 2019

Reference: (CGITA) No- 1272/2004

1. The Chief General Manager,

State Bank of India,

7^th Floor, Bhadra, Lal Darwaja,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

2. The Zonal Manager,

State Bank of India,

7^th Floor, Paradise Complex, Sayajigunj,

Baroda (Gujarat) – 394220

3. The Manager,

State Bank of India,

Udhna-Udognagar, P.B. No. 1,

Surat (Gujarat) – 394210

…First Parties

V/s.

Mrs. Savitaben Rameshchand Rana,

Near Hari Om Dying, J.P. Nagar,

2, Near Mangubhai Chatwale, Wed Road,

Surat (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Parties : Shri A.B. Gogia

For the Second Part : Shri P.F. Baxi

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12012/11/99–IR

(B-1) dated 06.05.1999 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the concerned workman Smt. Savitaben Rameshchand Rana has put in continuous service in the Bank as

per provisions of Section 25-B?”

And

“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India through its officers in

terminating/discontinuing the services of the workman Smt. Savitaben Rameshchand Rana w.e.f. 06.08.1998

on/with the plea of abolition/cancellation of the waiting list of temporary employees is legal, proper and

justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date and what other

directions are necessary in the matter?”

1. The reference dates back to 06.05.1999 and received on 09.05.1999 from Ministry of Labour and Employment, New

Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.

2. After issuing notice to the parties, the second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 9 on 03.07.2000 and the

first party submitted the written statement Ex. 10 on 08.04.2002. The case was listed for cross-examination of

parties.

3. On 08.04.2019, the second party workwoman Savitaben Rameshchand Rana and the first party State Bank of India,

Surat and others submitted the settlement Ex. 33 stating that the matter has been resolved by way of onetime

payment of Rs.200000/- (Rupees Two Lac) in the favour of second party workwoman Savitaben Rameshchand Rana

vide Demand Draft No. 329201 dated 04.04.2019 along with Rs.15000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) in the favour of

Shri P.F. Baxi, advocate of second party workwoman vide Demand Draft No. 329196 dated 04.04.2019 and nothing

has been left for further resolution. The said settlement Ex. 33 is read over and explained to the parties. They

admitted the terms and conditions of the settlement. Therefore, the settlement Ex. 33 is accepted by the Tribunal.

4. Thus the reference is disposed of in the light of the settlement Ex. 33. The settlement Ex. 33 shall remain the part of

the award.

5. The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

2794

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 11, 2019/VAISAKHA 21, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 1 ebZ] 2019

dk-vk- 714.—vkSn~;ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

if’pe jsyos ds izca/krarz ds lc) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkSn~;ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkSn~;ksfxd vf/kdj.k] अहमदाबाद ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 02@2018) dks izdkf’kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

01@05@2019 dks izkIr gqvk Fkk1

[la- ,y&41011@17@2017&vkbZ vkj (ch-1)]

ch. ,l. fc’V] अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1st May, 2019

S.O. 714.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 02/2018) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Western Railway and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on 01/05/2019.

[No. L-41011/17/2017–IR (B-1)]

B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 03^rd April, 2019

Reference: (CGITA) No- 02/2018

The Divisional Railway Manager (E),

Western Railway, Mumbai Central,

Mumbai – 400008

…First Party

V/s.

The President,

Railways Retired Employees Association,

D-29, Anandnagar, Near Science College,

Godhra (Gujarat) – 389001

…Second Party

For the First Party : None

For the Second Part : None

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-41011/17/2017–IR(B-I)

dated 05.01.2018 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Divisional Railway Manager, Western Railway, Mumbai in

denying compassionate allowance to Shri Sursing Mana who removed from service on 08.07.2009 on the

ground of absenteeism is legal and justified? If not, what relief the concerned workman is entitled to?”

1. The reference dates back to 05.01.2018 and received on 22.01.2018 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,

New Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.

2. After receiving the schedule of reference from Government of India, Ministry of Labour and Employment,

New Delhi, notices were issued to both the parties on 14.05.2018 to appear on 14.06.2018 but the second party

workman and his union did not prefer to submit the statement of claim. Thereafter, despite giving 6 more

opportunities on 07.08.2018, 11.09.2018, 30.10.2018, 26.12.2018, 13.02.2019 and 03.04.2019, the second party

workman and his union refrained to submit statement of claim.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 11] 2019@oS'kk[k 21] 1941

2795

^{3. Thus it appears that the second party workman and his union are not willing to prosecute the reference.}

4. Therefore, the reference is disposed of in the absence of the statement of claim of the second party workman and his

union with the observation as under: “the action of the management of Divisional Railway Manager, Western

Railway, Mumbai in denying compassionate allowance to Shri Sursing Mana who removed from service on

08.07.2009 on the ground of absenteeism is legal and justified.”

5. The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 ebZ] 2019

dk-avk- 715.—vkSn~;ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

भारतीय टेट बक ds izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkSn~;ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkSn~;ksfxd vf/kdj.k अहमदाबाद ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 1280@2004) dks izdkf’kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

01@05@2019 izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12012@4@99&vkbZ vkj (ch-1)]

ch. ,l. fc’V] अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1st May, 2019

S.O. 715.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1280/2004) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 01/05/2019.

[No. L-12012/4/99–IR (B-1)]

B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 08^th April, 2019

Reference: (CGITA) No. 1280/2004

1. The Chief General Manager,

State Bank of India,

7^th Floor, Bhadra, Lal Darwaja,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

2. The Zonal Manager,

State Bank of India,

7^th Floor, Paradise Complex, Sayajigunj,

Baroda (Gujarat) – 394220

3. The Manager,

State Bank of India,

Bhattar Road (Surat) Branch, Harkishan Building,

Surat (Gujarat) - 395003

4. The Manager,

State Bank of India,

Prakash Society (Surat) Branch, Surya Kiran Apartment,

Near St. Zavier’s School, Ghod-dhod,

Surat (Gujarat) – 395003

...First Parties

2796

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 11, 2019/VAISAKHA 21, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

V/s.

Shri Rajeshbhai Kondubhai Narge,

Room No. 41-81378, Navsari Bazar, Bombay Gate Gali,

Chamadiya Chawl,

Surat (Gujarat) - 395003

…Second Party

For the First Parties : Shri D.C. Gandhi

For the Second Party : Shri P.F. Baxi

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12012/4/99–IR(B-I)

dated 06.05.1999 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of

the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the concerned workman Shri Rajeshbhai Kondubhai Narge has put in continuous service in the

Bank as per provisions of Section 25-B?”

And

“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India through its officers in

terminating/discontinuing the services of the workman Shri Rajeshbhai Kondubhai Narge w.e.f. 07.09.1998

on/with the plea of abolition/cancellation of the waiting list of temporary employees is legal, proper and

justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date and what other

directions are necessary in the matter?”

1. The reference dates back to 06.05.1999 and received on 09.06.1999 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,

New Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.

2. After issuing notice to the parties, both the parties submitted their statement of claim and written statement as the

case may be. The case was listed for evidence of the second party.

3. On 08.04.2019, the second party workman Rajeshbhai Kondubhai Narge and the first party State Bank of India,

Surat and others submitted the settlement Ex. 30 stating that the matter has been resolved by way of onetime

payment of Rs.200000/- (Rupees Two Lac) in the favour of second party workman Rajeshbhai Kondubhai Narge

vide Demand Draft No. 774193 dated 05.04.2019 along with Rs.15000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) in the favour

of Shri P.F. Baxi, advocate of second party workman vide Demand Draft No. 774194 dated 05.04.2019 and

nothing has been left for further resolution. The said settlement Ex. 30 is read over and explained to the parties.

They admitted the terms and conditions of the settlement. Therefore, the settlement Ex. 30 is accepted by the

Tribunal.

4. Thus the reference is disposed of in the light of the settlement Ex. 30. The settlement Ex. 30 shall remain the part

of the award.

5. The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 ebZ] 2019

dk-avk- 716.—vkSn~;ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

if’pe jsyos ds izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkSn~;ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkSn~;ksfxd vf/kdj.k अहमदाबाद ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 15@2017) dks izdkf’kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

01@05@2019 izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&41011@21@2016&vkbZ vkj (ch-1)]

ch. ,l. fc’V] अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1st May, 2019

S.O. 716.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 15/2017) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Western Railway and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on 01/05/2019.

[No. L-41011/21/2016–IR (B-1)]

B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 11] 2019@oS'kk[k 21] 1941

2797

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 11^th April, 2019

Reference: (CGITA) No. 15/2017

1. The Sr. Divisional Personnel Officer,

O/o The Divisional Railway Manager,

Western Railway, Near Chamunda Bridge, Asarwa,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

2. The Sr. Divisional Engineer (Mechanical),

O/o The Divisional Railway Manager,

Western Railway, Near Chamunda Bridge, Asarwa,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

3. The Sr. Divisional Electrical Engineer,

O/o The Divisional Railway Manager,

Western Railway, Near Chamunda Bridge, Asarwa,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

4. The General Manager,

Western Railway, Churchgate,

Mumbai – 400020

…First Parties

V/s.

The Joint Divisional Secretary,

Paschim Railway Karmachari Parishad,

Sanand Railway Station, 28/B, Narayanpark,

Behind Chandkheda Railway Station, Sabarmati,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Party : Shri M.M. Makhija

For the Second Part : Shri R.S. Sisodiya

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-41011/21/2016–

IR(B-I) dated 07.03.2017 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum

Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Western Railway, Mumbai to :- (1) Not to grant promotion to

Shri Pravin Kumar Vaghela was justified and (2) Un-authorisedly deduct from salary of Shri Dhulabhai,

Technician III under Senior Section Engineer (C&W), Western Railway, Ahmedabad are justified? If not, then

what relief the said workmen are is entitled to?”

1. The reference dates back to 07.03.2017 and received on 22.03.2017 from Ministry of Labour and Employment, New

Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.

2. After receiving the schedule of reference from Government of India, Ministry of Labour and Employment, New

Delhi, notices were issued to both the parties. They were served but neither of the parties submitted the statement of

claim or written statement as the case may be.

3. Today on 11.04.2019, Shri R.S. Sisodiya, The Joint Divisional Secretary, Paschim Railway Karmachari Parishad,

Sanand Railway Station, 28/B, Narayanpark, Behind Chandkheda Railway Station, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad

requested to withdraw the reference.

4. Therefore, the reference is disposed of as withdrawn.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 ebZ] 2019

dk-vk- 717.—vkSn~;ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

भारतीय टेट बक ds izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkSn~;ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

2798

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 11, 2019/VAISAKHA 21, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ljdkj vkSn~;ksfxd vf/kdj.k अहमदाबाद ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 86@200

200

2005) dks izdkf’kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

01@05@2019 izkIr gqvk Fkk1

[la- ,y&12012@465@99&vkbZ vkj (ch-1)]

ch. ,l. fc’V] अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1st May, 2019

S.O. 717.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 86/2005) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 01/05/2019.

[No. L-12012/465/99–IR (B-1)]

B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 08^th April, 2019

Reference: (CGITA) No. 86/2005

1. The Chief General Manager,

State Bank of India,

Local Head Office, Lal Darwaja,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

2. The Chief Manager,

State Bank of India, Salabatpura,

Surat (Gujarat)

…First Parties

V/s.

Smt. Vanitaben T. Rathod,

C/o Mukeshbhai B. Tailor,

Imamwada Muglisara,

Opp. Cambay Class,

Surat (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Parties : Shri D.C. Gandhi

For the Second Party : Shri L.M. Patil

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12012/465/99–

IR(B-I) dated 28.09.2005 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum

Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India, Surat, Ahmedabad in terminating the services

of Smt. Vanitaben T. Rathod w.e.f. 1994 and not absorbing her with retrospective effect i.e. date of absorption

of her junior is justified or not? If not, to what relief he is entitled to and from which date?”

1. The reference dates back to 28.09.2005 and received on 06.10.2005 from Ministry of Labour and Employment, New

Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.

2. After issuing notice to the parties, the second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 6 and the case was listed for

filing of written statement by the first party.

3. On 08.04.2019, the second party workwoman Vanitaben T. Rathod and the first party State Bank of India, Surat and

others submitted the settlement Ex. 16 stating that the matter has been resolved by way of onetime payment of

Rs.200000/- (Rupees Two Lac) in the favour of second party workwoman Vanitaben T. Rathod vide Demand Draft

No. 329199 dated 04.04.2019 along with Rs.15000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) in the favour of Shri L.M. Patil,

advocate of second party workwoman vide Demand Draft No. 329197 dated 04.04.2019 and nothing has been left

for further resolution. The said settlement Ex. 16 is read over and explained to the parties. They admitted the terms

and conditions of the settlement. Therefore, the settlement Ex. 16 is accepted by the Tribunal.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 11] 2019@oS'kk[k 21] 1941

2799

^{4. Thus the reference is disposed of in the light of the settlement Ex. 16. The settlement Ex. 16 shall remain the part of}

the award.

5. The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 ebZ] 2019

dk-vk- 718.—vkSn~;ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

भारतीय टेट बक ds izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkSn~;ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkSn~;ksfxd vf/kdj.k अहमदाबाद ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 1212121286@200

200

2004) dks izdkf’kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

01@05@2019 izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12012@151@99&vkbZ vkj (ch-1)]

ch. ,l. fc’V] अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1st May, 2019

S.O. 718.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1286/2004) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 01/05/2019.

[No. L-12012/151/99–IR (B-1)]

B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 08^th April, 2019

Reference: (CGITA) No. 1286/2004

1. The Chief General Manager,

State Bank of India, 7^th Floor, Bhadra, Lal Darwaja,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

2. The Zonal Manager,

State Bank of India, 7^th Floor, Paradise Complex, Sayajigunj,

Baroda (Gujarat)–390005

3. The Branch Manager,

State Bank of India, Gandhav,

Valsad (Gujarat) - 396370

4. The Branch Manager,

State Bank of India,

Billimora (Gujarat)-396370

5. The Branch Manager,

State Bank of India, GIDC,

Navsari (Gujarat) – 396370

6. The Branch Manager,

State Bank of India, Navsari Branch,

Navsari (Gujarat) – 396370

…First Parties

V/s.

Shri Jairambhai Ravjibhai Ahir,

Village and Post Kachholi, Via, Amalsad, Taluka Gajdevi,

Valsad (Gujarat) - 396370

…Second Party

For the First Parties

: Shri D.C. Gandhi

For the Second Party

: Shri P.F. Baxi

2800

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 11, 2019/VAISAKHA 21, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12012/151/99–

IR(B-I) dated 29.07.1999 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the concerned workman Shri Jairambhai Ravjibhai Ahir has put in continuous service in the Bank as

per provisions of Section 25-B?”

And

“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India through its officers in

terminating/discontinuing the services of the workman Shri Jairambhai Ravjibhai Ahir w.e.f. 30.11.1996

on/with the plea of abolition/cancellation of the waiting list of temporary employees is legal, proper and

justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date and what other

directions are necessary in the matter?”

1. The reference dates back to 29.07.1999 and received on 11.08.1999 from Ministry of Labour and Employment, New

Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.

2. After issuing notice to the parties, both the parties submitted their statement of claim and written statement as the

case may be. The case was listed for cross-examination of the second party.

3. On 08.04.2019, the second party workman Jairambhai Ravjibhai Ahir and the first party State Bank of India, Surat

and others submitted the settlement Ex. 37 stating that the matter has been resolved by way of onetime payment of

Rs.200000/- (Rupees Two Lac) in the favour of second party workman Jairambhai Ravjibhai Ahir vide Demand

Draft No. 483371 dated 04.04.2019 along with Rs.15000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) in the favour of Shri P.F.

Baxi, advocate of second party workman vide Demand Draft No. 483369 dated 04.04.2019 and nothing has been left

for further resolution. The said settlement Ex. 37 is read over and explained to the parties. They admitted the terms

and conditions of the settlement. Therefore, the settlement Ex. 37 is accepted by the Tribunal.

4. Thus the reference is disposed of in the light of the settlement Ex. 37. The settlement Ex. 37 shall remain the part of

the award.

5. The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 ebZ] 2019

dk-vk- 719.—vkSn~;ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

if’pe jsyos ds izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkSn~;ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkSn~;ksfxd vf/kdj.k अहमदाबाद ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 768@2004) dks izdkf’kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

01@05@2019 izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&41012@110@93&vkbZ vkj (ch-1)]

ch. ,l. fc’V] अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1st May, 2019

S.O. 719.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 768/2004) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Western Railway and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on 01/05/2019.

[No. L-41012/110/93–IR (B-1)]

B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 11] 2019@oS'kk[k 21] 1941

2801

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 11^th April, 2019

Reference: (CGITA) No. 768/2004

1. The General Manager,

Western Railway, Churchgate,

Mumbai – 400020

2. The Chief Workshop Manager,

Western Railway, Post Dahod,

Panchmahal (Gujarat)

…First Parties

V/s.

1. The Joint Divisional Secretary,

Paschim Railway Karmachari Parishad,

A-49, Sant Kabirnagar, Akota, Baroda (Gujarat)

2. Sukliben Sakarabhai D.,

C/o The President,

General Workmen’s Union,

Sinduri Mata Devasthan, Near S.T. Nagar Road,

Godhra (Gujarat) - 389001

…Second Party

For the First Parties : Shri M.M. Makhija

For the Second Party : Shri J.K. Ved & Shri Prabhatsinh Parmar

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-41012/110/93–

IR(B-I) dated 23.03.1995 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the Chief Works Manager, Loco Workshop, Dahod in terminating the services of

Shri Sakarabhai D., Rigger w.e.f. 30.05.1991 is legal, proper and justified? If not, to what relief the workman

is entitled to and what directions are necessary in the matter?”

1. The reference dates back to 23.03.1995 received from Ministry of Labour and Employment, New Delhi for

adjudication and passing the award.

2. In response to the notice issued to the parties, the second party union submitted the statement of claim Ex. 3 on

11.07.1998 and the first party submitted the written statement Ex. 7 on 27.01.2003.

3. The second party in his statement of claim Ex. 3 has alleged that the workman Sakarabhai D. worked for more than

17 years with the first party The Chief Workshop Manager, Western Railway, Post Dahod, Panchmahal, hereinafter

referred to as ‘first party’. Despite his blotless carrier and service, he was served a charge-sheet dated 14.12.1990

with a charge of 239 days absence from service. He explained his absent before the enquiry officer in the

departmental enquiry that he was suffering with mental disorder and was also an illiterate schedule tribe but his

submission was turned around. He has further alleged that the documents mentioned in the charge-sheet were not

shown to him and the railway doctor issued him a medical fitness certificate. He was legally entitled to get treatment

from a private doctor as per Para 537 of the Indian Railway Medical Manual and on this very ground, the charge-

sheet was liable to be struck down but to no result in the enquiry. He explained his absence in the enquiry that he

was suffering with mental sickness but same was not considered while awarding the punishment. Therefore, he has

prayed that the termination order dated 30.05.1991 be declared as null and void and directing the first party to

reinstate him with back wages.

4. The first party in his written statement Ex. 9 partly admitting the averments made in the statement of claim

submitted that this workman was working as Rigger in Loco Workshop, Dahod since last several years but his

service was not satisfactory. He remained absent from duty from 13.02.1990 to 09.10.1990 without permission.

Therefore, he was served with a charge-sheet on 14.12.1990. He did not attend the enquiry. The enquiry was

conducted in a regular manner following the due procedure. He was held guilty for the said charge in the enquiry,

therefore, the disciplinary authority removed him from service and his appeal was rejected with a detailed reasoned

2802

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 11, 2019/VAISAKHA 21, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

order. He has been in a habit of regular absent during his whole service, therefore, his termination cannot be held

unjust and illegal.

5. The workman Sakarabhai D. expired on 12.03.2007; therefore, vide application Ex. 10, his widow named Sukliben

Sakarabhai D. was substituted as legal heir of the deceased workman. The first party vide list Ex. 21 submitted the

service record of the deceased workman.

6. On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:

Whether the action of the Chief Works Manager, Loco Workshop, Dahod in terminating the services of Shri

Sakarabhai D., Rigger w.e.f. 30.05.1991 is legal, proper and justified?

ii.

To what relief, if any, the widow named Sukliben Sakarabhai D. of the deceased workman is entitled?

7. Issue No. i and ii: As both the issues are interrelated, therefore, are decided together. The burden of proof of these

issues lies on the second party workman and his widow Sukaliben Sakarabhai D. submitted her affidavit Ex. 7

reiterating the averments made in the statement of claim and has not said anything contrary to her examination-in-

chief.

8. I heard the learned counsel for the parties and considered the evidence available on record. It is an admitted fact that

the deceased workman had been working as Rigger in the workshop Dahod for 17 years and was removed from

service after conducting a departmental enquiry for a charge of 239 days long absence from duty. The first party has

submitted the service record admitting the fact that the workman worked for 17 years from 27.09.1974 to

30.05.1991. The advocate for the first party admitted that the widow of the deceased workman may move an

application before the appropriate authority for pension.

9. I would like to reproduce the provisions of the Rule 65 of the Railway Service Pension Rules, 1993 as under:

“65. Compassionate allowance -

(1) A railway servant who is dismissed or removed from service shall forfeit his pension and gratuity.

Provided that the authority competent to dismiss or remove him from service may, if the case is deserving

of special consideration, sanction a compassionate allowance not exceeding two-thirds of pension or

gratuity or both which would have been admissible to him if he had retired on compensation pension. “

10. I perused the punishment order which reveals that the deceased workman was removed from immediate effect but

the order was silent regarding the pension and gratuity, therefore, in the light of the Rules 65 (1) of Railway Service

Pension Rules, 1993 considering the illiteracy, tribal and mental sickness of the deceased workman, the Railway

ought to have ordered two-third pension to the workman. But now the workman has died and his widow is in

financial distress, therefore, it would be appropriate that the railway authority ought to have granted family pension

to the widow of the deceased workman.

11. The widow named Sukliben Sakarabhai D. of the deceased workman named Sakarabhai D. shall apply for the family

pension to the appropriate authority and the appropriate authority shall considered it favourably within 30 days from

moving of application by the widow of the deceased workman.

12. The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 ebZ] 2019

dk-vk- 720.—vkSn~;ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad vkWQ bafM;k ds izca/kra=z ds lc) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkSn~;ksfxd fookn

esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkSn~;ksfxd vf/kdj.k अहमदाबाद ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 1212121268@

8@200

200

2004) dks izdkf’kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 01@05@2019 izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12012@599@98&vkbZ vkj (ch-1)]

ch. ,l. fc’V] अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1st May, 2019

S.O. 720.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1268/2004) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 01.05.2019.

[No. L-12012/599/98–IR (B-1)]

B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 11] 2019@oS'kk[k 21] 1941

2803

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 08^th April, 2019

Reference: (CGITA) No. 1268/2004

1. The Chief General Manager,

State Bank of India,

7^th Floor, Bhadra, Lal Darwaja,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

2. The Zonal Manager,

State Bank of India,

7^th Floor, Paradise Complex, Sayajigunj,

Baroda (Gujarat) – 394220

3. The Manager,

State Bank of India,

Salabatpura, (Surat) Branch, Maharaj Chambers,

Mahatma Wadi, P.B. No. 168,

Surat (Gujarat) - 395002

4. The Manager,

State Bank of India,

Udhna-Udognagar, P.B. No. 1,

Surat (Gujarat) – 394210

…First Parties

V/s.

Mr. Harshad Govindbhai Patel,

Banglow No. 1, Sunivas Row House, Ambica Niketan,

Surat (Gujarat) - 395003

…Second Party

For the First Parties : Shri A.B. Gogia

For the Second Party : Shri P.F. Baxi

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12012/599/98–

IR(B-I) dated 30.03.1999 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the concerned workman Shri Harshad Govindbhai Patel has put in continuous service in the Bank as

per provisions of Section 25-B?”

And

“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India through its officers in

terminating/discontinuing the services of the workman Shri Harshad Govindbhai Patel w.e.f. 30.09.1997

on/with the plea of abolition/cancellation of the waiting list of temporary employees is legal, proper and

justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date and what other

directions are necessary in the matter?”

1. The reference dates back to 30.03.1999 and received on 05.04.1999 from Ministry of Labour and Employment, New

Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.

2. After issuing notice to the parties, both the parties submitted their statement of claim and written statement as the

case may be. The case was listed for cross-examination of parties.

3. On 08.04.2019, the second party workman Harshad Govindbhai Patel and the first party State Bank of India, Surat

and others submitted the settlement Ex. 35 stating that the matter has been resolved by way of onetime payment of

Rs.200000/- (Rupees Two Lac) in the favour of second party workman Harshad Govindbhai Patel vide Demand

Draft No. 329198 dated 04.04.2019 along with Rs.15000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) in the favour of Shri P.F.

Baxi, advocate of second party workman vide Demand Draft No. 329200 dated 04.04.2019 and nothing has been left

for further resolution. The said settlement Ex. 35 is read over and explained to the parties. They admitted the terms

and conditions of the settlement. Therefore, the settlement Ex. 35 is accepted by the Tribunal.

2804

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 11, 2019/VAISAKHA 21, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

^{4. Thus the reference is disposed of in the light of the settlement Ex. 35. The settlement Ex. 35 shall remain the part of}

the award.

5. The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 ebZ] 2019

dk-vk- 721.—vkSn~;ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad vkWQ bafM;k ds izca/krar= ds lc) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkSn~;ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkSn~;ksfxd vf/kdj.k अहमदाबाद ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 1212121299@200

200

2004) dks izdkf’kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 01@05@2019 izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12012@404@99&vkbZ vkj (ch-1)]

ch. ,l. fc’V] अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1st May, 2019

S.O. 721.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1299/2004) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 01.05.2019.

[No. L-12012/404/99–IR (B-1)]

B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi,Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 08^th April, 2019

Reference: (CGITA) No. 1299/2004

1. The Chief General Manager,

State Bank of India, 7^th Floor, Bhadra, Lal Darwaja,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

3. The Deputy General Manager,

State Bank of India, Zonal Office,

7^th Floor, Paradise Complex, Sayajigunj,

Baroda (Gujarat) – 390005

4. The Manager,

State Bank of India, Nanpura Branch, Hathugar Mohalla, Nanpura

Surat (Gujarat)

5. The Manager,

State Bank of India, Pardi Sery Branch, Badli Fali Ya,

Surat (Gujarat)

…First Parties

V/s.

Shri Jagdish Jamalbhai Parmar,

Krishna Raw House No. 26,

Palanpur Jagat Naka Palanpur Road,

Surat (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Parties : Shri D.C. Gandhi

For the Second Party : Shri P.F. Baxi

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 11] 2019@oS'kk[k 21] 1941

2805

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12012/404/99–

IR(B-I) dated 19.07.2000 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri Jagdishbhai

Jamalbhai Parmar w.e.f. 16.07.1999 is justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled?”

6. The reference dates back to 19.07.2000 and received on 05.08.2000 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,

New Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.

7. After issuing notice to the parties, both the parties submitted their statement of claim and written statement as the

case may be. The case was listed for evidence of the second party.

3. On 08.04.2019, the second party workman Jagdishbhai Jamalbhai Parmar and the first party State Bank of India,

Surat and others submitted the settlement Ex. 31 stating that the matter has been resolved by way of onetime

payment of Rs.200000/- (Rupees Two Lac) in the favour of second party workman Jagdishbhai Jamalbhai Parmar

vide Demand Draft No. 427233 dated 04.04.2019 along with Rs.15000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) in the favour of

Shri P.F. Baxi, advocate of second party workman vide Demand Draft No. 427235 dated 04.04.2019 and nothing

has been left for further resolution. The said settlement Ex. 31 is read over and explained to the parties. They

admitted the terms and conditions of the settlement. Therefore, the settlement Ex. 31 is accepted by the Tribunal.

4. Thus the reference is disposed of in the light of the settlement Ex. 31. The settlement Ex. 31 shall remain the part of

the award.

5. The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 ebZ] 2019

dk-vk- 722.—vkSn~;ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad vkWQ bafM;k ds izca/krarz ds lc) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkSn~;ksfxd fookn

esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkSn~;ksfxd vf/kdj.k अहमदाबाद ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 1212121260@200

200

2004) dks izdkf’kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 01-05-2019 izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12012@383@98&vkbZ vkj (ch-1)]

ch. ,l. fc’V] अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1st May, 2019

S.O. 722.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1260/2004) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 01.05.2019.

[No. L-12012/383/98–IR (B-1)]

B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 08^th April, 2019

Reference: (CGITA) No. 1260/2004

The Chief General Manager,

State Bank of India,

7^th Floor, Bhadra, Lal Darwaja,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

2. The Regional Manager,

2806

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 11, 2019/VAISAKHA 21, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

State Bank of India,

Region – III, Zonal Office, 7^th Floor, Paradise Complex, Sayajigunj,

Baroda (Gujarat) – 394220

3. The Manager,

State Bank of India,

Service Branch, 2^nd Floor, Akshar Complex,

Behind Rang Upavan, Makkaipool,

Surat (Gujarat) – 395003

…First Parties

V/s.

Mr. Santhosh Kumar Nathuram More,

Navsari Bazar, Behind Bombay Gate, Chamdiya Ki Chawl, Room No. 45,

Surat (Gujarat) - 395003

…Second Party

For the First Parties : Shri A.B. Gogia

For the Second Party : Shri P.F. Baxi

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12012/383/98–

IR(B-I) dated 11.03.1999 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the concerned workman Shri Santhosh Kumar Nathuram More has put in continuous service in the

Bank as per provisions of Section 25-B?”

And

“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India through its officers in

terminating/discontinuing the services of the workman Shri Santhosh Kumar Nathuram More w.e.f.

28.02.1997 on/with the plea of abolition/cancellation of the waiting list of temporary employees is legal,

proper and justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date and what

other directions are necessary in the matter?”

1. The reference dates back to 11.03.1999 and received on 26.03.1999 from Ministry of Labour and Employment, New

Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.

2. After issuing notice to the parties, both the parties submitted their statement of claim and written statement as the

case may be. The case was listed for evidence of the second party.

3. On 08.04.2019, the second party workman Santhosh Kumar Nathuram More and the first party State Bank of India,

Surat and others submitted the settlement Ex. 33 stating that the matter has been resolved by way of onetime

payment of Rs.200000/- (Rupees Two Lac) in the favour of second party workman Santhosh Kumar Nathuram More

vide Demand Draft No. 774197 dated 05.04.2019 along with Rs.15000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) in the favour of

Shri P.F. Baxi, advocate of second party workman vide Demand Draft No. 774196 dated 05.04.2019 and nothing

has been left for further resolution. The said settlement Ex. 33 is read over and explained to the parties. They

admitted the terms and conditions of the settlement. Therefore, the settlement Ex. 33 is accepted by the Tribunal.

4. Thus the reference is disposed of in the light of the settlement Ex. 33. The settlement Ex. 33 shall remain the part of

the award.

5. The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 ebZ] 2019

dk-vk- 723.—vkSn~;ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

if’pe jsyos izca/krar= ds lc) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkSn~;ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkSn~;ksfxd vf/kdj.k अहमदाबाद ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 83838383@2020202015) dks izdkf’kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 01-05-2019

izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&41011@59@2015&vkbZ vkj (ch-1)]

ch. ,l. fc’V] अवर सिचव

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 11] 2019@oS'kk[k 21] 1941

2807

New Delhi, the 1st May, 2019

S.O. 723.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 83/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Western Railway and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on 01.05.2019.

[No. L-41011/59/2015–IR (B-1)]

B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 11^th April, 2019

Reference: (CGITA) No. 83/2015

1. The Divisional Railway Manager,

Western Railway, Asarwa, Near Chamunda Bridge,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

2. The Chief Medical Officer,

Western Railway, Sabarmati Railway Hospital, Sabarmati,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…First Parties

V/s.

The Joint Divisional Secretary,

Paschim Railway Karmachari Parishad,

Sanand Railway Station, PO Nidh Road, Sanand,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Parties : Shri H.R. Raval

For the Second Party : Shri R.S. Sisodiya

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-41011/59/2015–

IR(B-I) dated 26.11.2015 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of the Joint Divisional Secretary, Paschim Railway Karmachari Parishad, Ahmedabad

against the Divisional Railway Manager, Western Railway, Ahmedabad to appoint the sons of Late Shri Bula

Sakra, Shri Babubhai Bhula Sakra under compassionate ground is justified? If yes, then what relief Shri

Babubhai Bhula Sakra is entitled to?”

1. The reference dates back to 26.11.2015 and received on 16.12.2015 from Ministry of Labour and Employment,

New Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.

2. After receiving the schedule of reference from Government of India, Ministry of Labour and Employment, New

Delhi, notices were issued to both the parties. They were served but neither of the parties submitted the

statement of claim or written statement as the case may be.

3. Today on 11.04.2019, Shri R.S. Sisodiya, The Joint Divisional Secretary, Paschim Railway Karmachari

Parishad, Sanand Railway Station, 28/B, Narayanpark, Behind Chandkheda Railway Station, Sabarmati,

Ahmedabad requested to withdraw the reference.

4. Therefore, the reference is disposed of as withdrawn.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 ebZ] 2019

dk-vk- 724.—vkSn~;ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad vkWQ bafM;k ds izca/krar= ds lc) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkSn~;ksfxd

2808

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 11, 2019/VAISAKHA 21, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkSn~;ksfxd vf/kdj.k अहमदाबाद ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 1212121284@200

200

2004) dks izdkf’kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 01-05-2019 izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12012@137@99&vkbZ vkj (ch-1)]

ch. ,l. fc’V] अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1st May, 2019

S.O. 724.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1284/2004) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 01,05,2019.

[No. L-12012/137/99–IR (B-1)]

B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Ahmedabad,

Dated 08^th April, 2019

Reference: (CGITA) No. 1284/2004

1. The Chief General Manager,

State Bank of India,

7^th Floor, Bhadra, Lal Darwaja,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

2. The Zonal Manager,

State Bank of India,

7^th Floor, Paradise Complex, Sayajigunj,

Baroda (Gujarat) – 394220

3. The Branch Manager,

State Bank of India,

Navsari (Gujarat)

4. The Branch Manager,

State Bank of India,

Billimora (Gujarat)

…First Parties

V/s.

Shri Navnitbhai Raghubhai Patel,

Village and Post Vasma, Kacchiawadi,

Taluka Jalalpore,

Navsari (Gujarat)

…Second Party

For the First Parties : Shri D.C. Gandhi

For the Second Part : Shri P.F. Baxi

AWARD

The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12012/137/99–

IR(B-I) dated 28.07.1999 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the concerned workman Shri Navnitbhai Raghubhai Patel has put in continuous service in the Bank

as per provisions of Section 25-B?”

And

“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India through its officers in terminating/discontinuing the

services of the workman Shri Navnitbhai Raghubhai Patel w.e.f. 05.07.1997 on/with the plea of

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 11] 2019@oS'kk[k 21] 1941

2809

abolition/cancellation of the waiting list of temporary employees is legal, proper and justified? If not, to what relief

the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date and what other directions are necessary in the matter?”

1. The reference dates back to 28.07.1999 and received on 17.08.1999 from Ministry of Labour and Employment, New

Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.

2. After issuing notice to the parties, both the parties submitted their statement of claim and written statement as the

case may be. The case was listed for cross-examination of the second party.

3. On 08.04.2019, the second party workman Navnitbhai Raghubhai Patel and the first party State Bank of India, Surat

and others submitted the settlement Ex. 33 stating that the matter has been resolved by way of onetime payment of

Rs.200000/- (Rupees Two Lac) in the favour of second party workman Navnitbhai Raghubhai Patel vide Demand

Draft No. 483372 dated 04.04.2019 along with Rs.15000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) in the favour of Shri P.F.

Baxi, advocate of second party workman vide Demand Draft No. 483370 dated 04.04.2019 and nothing has been left

for further resolution. The said settlement Ex. 33 is read over and explained to the parties. They admitted the terms

and conditions of the settlement. Therefore, the settlement Ex. 33 is accepted by the Tribunal.

4. Thus the reference is disposed of in the light of the settlement Ex. 33. The settlement Ex. 33 shall remain the part of

the award.

5. The award is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

नई दली, 3 मई, 2019

का. आ.

का. आ. 725

725

725.—औNोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) क( धारा 17 के अनुसरण म$ के:%ीय सरकार

मेसस0 भारत पेWोिलयम कारपोरेशन िलिमटेड एवं अ:य के बंधतं2 के संबz िनयोजक! और उनके कम0कार! के बीच अनुबंध म$

िन{दO औNोिगक िववाद म$ के:%ीय सरकार औNोिगक अिधकरण एवं mम :यायालय, चे€ई के पंचाट

(संदभ0 संया 28/2019) को कािशत करती है जो के:%ीय सरकार को 02.05.2019 को ाJ Eआ था।

[सं. जेड-16025/4/2019-आई आर (एम)]

डी.के. िहमांशु, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 3rd May, 2019

S.O. 725.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 28/2019) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management

M/s Bharat Petroleum Corporation of India and others and their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 02.05.2019.

[No. Z-16025/4/2019-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL- CUM – LABOUR COURT

CHENNAI

Present : DIPTI MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer

I.D. No. 28/2019

Friday, the 29^th March, 2019

BETWEEN

Sri S. Bharthi Mohan

S/o N. Sivananthm,

2810

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 11, 2019/VAISAKHA 21, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

^{No. 7/59B, Mariamman Kovil 2}^nd^Street,

C. Pallavaram

Chennai-600043

1^st Party/Petitioner

AND

1. The General Manager

2^nd Party/1^st to 4 Respondent

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

No. 1, Raganathan Garden

11^th Main Road, Annanagar West

Chennai-600040

2. The Manager

32A, T.S. Krishna Nagar, Mugappair,

Anna Nagar West

Chennai-600050

3. Sqn.LDr. V. Venkatadri (Retd.)

New No. 20, 18^th Avenue

Ashok Nagar

Chennai-600083

4. Mr. S. Ramachandran

New No. 6 (Old No. 11), Damodaran St.

Kellys

Chennai-600010

Appearance:

For the 1^st Party/Petitioner

: Party in Person

For the 2^nd Party/Respondents 1 to 4 : None

ORDER

This is an Application under 2A(2) of the Industrial Dispute Act Filed by one Mr. S. Bharathi Mohan, The Applicant

case in brief is that he was employed under the Respondents through the 4^th Respondent-Contractor as a pump operator

with a monthly salary of Rs. 14,700/- and alongwith Bonus and other Allowances, on the strength of an agreement dated

01.08.2004. While the matter stood thus, he was terminated from service without any prior notice under section 25 of the

ID Act. The Applicant urges, he moved the appropriate Authority by his petition under section 33(c)(2) of the ID Act

claiming compensation and benefits owing to his termination. But to his ill luck the petition was dismissed. With this

backdrop the petitioner claims to set aside the order of the termination and his reinstatement with all financial benefits

for his service period from 1995 to 2007.

2. During the course hearing the Learned Counsel moves this petition under section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone

the delay of 4180 days in filing of the Application under 2A of the ID Act. He assigns the reason of the delay that the

petitioner moved the appropriate Authority for compensation owing to his termination which was dismissed on

29.01.2010 occasioning him to approach the Deputy Labour Commissioner (C), Chennai on dated 08.01.2013 which is

still pending disposal. He further assigns the reason that his relevant file was misplaced in the office of the Union, which

was received only on 17.12.2018. Thereafter the Applicant files this Application under 2A of the ID Act. Hence, prays to

condone the delay and admit the case.

3. In view of the facts discussion held supra and on through perusal of the Office Note, the Claim Statement and other

documents including the delay condonation petition, it undoubtedly appears that there is inordinate delay of 4190 days in

filing of the Applications. In order to bring the instant Application within the admit of the amended provision under 2A

Act, it is to be seen if the Applicant approaches this Forum-The Industrial Tribunal after exhausting all pre requisites of

the conditions contemplated under the provision of 2A (2) of the Act. Admittedly the amended insertion under 2A of the

ID Act is a beneficiary legislation for workmen, which provides a right in favour of the workmen to approach directly to

the appropriate the Forum under the Act to get immediate relief.

Section 2A sub clause (2) of the ID Act reads as follows:

“Notwithstanding anything contained is Section 10 any such workmen as is specified in Sub-section (1) may,

make an application direct to the Labour Court or Tribunal for adjudication of the dispute referred to

therein after the expiry of forty-five days from the date he has made the application to the Conciliation

Officer of the appropriate Government for conciliation of the dispute, and in receipt of such application the

Labour Court or Tribunal shall have powers and jurisdiction to adjudication upon the dispute , xx xx xx xx

xx xx xx xx xx Section 2A of sub clause (3) reads as follows

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % ebZ 11] 2019@oS'kk[k 21] 1941

2811

“The application referred to in Sub-section (2) shall be made to the Labour Court or Tribunal before the

expiry of three years from the date of discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or otherwise termination of service

as specified in Sub-section (1)”

4. In combined reading of both the section it needs to see if the Applicant has filed the Application within a period of 3

years from the date of the alleged termination. And also to see if the Applicant approached the Labour Machinery within

the period of 3 years and after expiry of 45 days of such approach, has filed the instant Applications under 2A (2) before

this Tribunal. In a meticulous perusal and scrutiny on the documents available on record, it is found that except a petition

to condone delay, the Applicant failed to produce a single scrap of documents relating to his appointment, termination, or

any copies of the petition showing to have moved before the Labour Machinery. On further perusal of the Office Note it

is found that the Applicant was provided with sufficient opportunity to produce the relevant documents. The Applicant

when fails to produce any document regarding his approach to Labour Machinery-Conciliation Officer, did not turn-up

to convince the delay of 4190 (as per the Office Note). In filing of the Applications. On the other hand the reason

assigned by the Applicant in his petition to condone delay does not sound reasonable. The petition to condone the delay

of 4190 days is rejected, being devoid of any merit.

5. In view of the discussion held in preceding paragraphs the Application filed by the Applicant deserves not

maintainable under the provisions under section 2(2A) of the Industrial Dispute Act.

The case in ID 28 of 2019 stands dismissed.

DIPTI MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer

नई दली, 3 मई, 2019

का. आ.

का. आ. 726

726

726.—औNोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) क( धारा 17 के अनुसरण म$ के:%ीय सरकार

िन{दO औNोिगक िववाद म$ के:%ीय सरकार औNोिगक अिधकरण एवं mम :यायालय, चे€ई के पंचाट

(संदभ0 संया 29/2019) को कािशत करती है जो के:%ीय सरकार को 02.05.2019 को ाJ Eआ था।

[सं. जेड-16025/4/2019-आई आर (एम)]

डी.के. िहमांशु, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 3rd May, 2019

S.O.726.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 29/2019) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management

M/s Bharat Petroleum Corporation of India and others and their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 02.05.2019.

[No. Z-16025/4/2019-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL-CUM–LABOUR COURT

CHENNAI

Present : DIPTI MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer

I.D. No. 29/2019

Friday, the 29^th March, 2019

BETWEEN

Sri G. Gnanavel,

S/o Ganesan,

No. 10, Nalvaravu Street,

MMDA Colony, Arumbakkam,

Chennai-600106

1^st Party/Petitioner

2812

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 11, 2019/VAISAKHA 21, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

^AND

1. The General Manager

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

No. 1, Raganathan Garden

11^th Main Road, Annanagar West

Chennai-600040 :

2^nd Party/1^st 1 to 4 Respondent

2. The Manager

32A, T.S. Krishna Nagar, Mugappair,

Anna Nagar West

Chennai-600050 :

3. Sqn.LDr. V. Venkatadri (Retd.)

New No. 20, 18^th Avenue

Ashok Nagar

Chennai-600083 :

4. Mr. S. Ramachandran

New No. 6 (Old No. 11), Damodaran Street

Kellys Chennai-600010 :

Appearance:

For the 1^st Party/Petitioner

Party in Person

For the 2^nd Party/Respondents 1 to 4 :

None

ORDER

This is an Application under 2A(2) of the Industrial Dispute Act Filed by one Mr. G. Gnavavel, The Applicant case in

brief is that he was employed under the Respondents through the 4^th Respondent-Contractor as a pump operator with a

monthly salary of Rs. 14,700/- and alongwith Bonus and other Allowances, on the strength of an agreement dated