5105 GI/2019

(7113)

jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

lkIrkfgd

WEEKLY

la- 41]

ubZ fnYyh] vDrwcj 6—vDrwcj 12] 2019] 'kfuokj@vkf'ou 14—vkf'ou 20] 1941

No. 41]

NEW DELHI, OCTOBER 6— OCTOBER 12, 2019, SATURDAY/ASVINA 14— ASVINA 20, 1941

bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

िवदेश

िवदेश मंालय

मंालय

(सी.पी.वी. भाग)

नई दली, 23 िसत बर, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 1802

1802

1802.—राजनियक और कसुलीय अिधकारी (शपथ एवं फस) के अिधिनयम, 1948 (1948 का 41) क

धारा 2 के खंड (क) के अनुसरण म वैधािनक आदेश ।

एत ारा, क! सरकार भारत के दूतावास, म"कट म $ी सािहल आ&जा, सहायक अनुभाग अिधकारी को दनांक 23

िसतबर 2019 से सहायक कसुलर अिधकारी के तौर पर कसुलर सेवा+ के िनव,हन के िलए -ािधकृत करती है।

[सं. टी-4330/01/2016]

िवनेश कुमार कालड़ा, अवर सिचव (कसुलर)

7114

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

(CPV Division)

New Delhi, the 23^rd September, 2019

S.O. 1802.—Statutory Order in pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular

Officers (Oaths and fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri SAHIL AHUJA,

Assistant Section Officer as Assistant Consular Officer in Embassy of India, Muscat to perform the Consular services

with effect from 23 September, 2019.

[No.T-4330/01/2016]

VINESH KUMAR KALRA, Under Secy. (Consular)

कामक

कामक, लोक िशकायत तथा पशन मंालय

लोक िशकायत तथा पशन मंालय

(कामक और िशण िवभाग)

नई द ली, 9 अ1 तूबर, 2019

का

का. आ. 1803

. 1803

. 1803.—के3 ! सरकार, एत ारा द ली िवशेष पुिलस " थापना अिधिनयम, 1946 (1946 का अिधिनयम

सं6 या 25) क धारा 3 ;ारा -द< शि=य का -योग करते &ए िन@िलिखत अपराध को भी द ली िवशेष पुिलस " थापना के

सद"य ;ारा अ3वेषण करने के िलए िविनDदE ट करती है:-

(क)

कना,टक िनवेशक के िहत का संरFण िव<ीय "थापना अिधिनयम, 2004 (2005 के कना,टक अिधिनयम

सं. 30)।

(ख)

उपयु,1 त अपराध के संबंध म या इनसे जुड़े -यास, दुE -ेरणा+ और षडयंO तथा उ3 हP तQ य से उR प3 न

उसी संS यवहार म कए गए अथवा कसी अ3 य अपराध या अपराध हेतु ।

[फा. सं. 228/23/2019-एवीडी-II]

एस.पी.आर. िO पाठी, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department of Personnel and Training)

New Delhi, the 9^th October, 2019

S.O. 1803.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act,

1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government hereby specifies the following offences which are also to be

investigated by members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment, namely :-

(a)

Karnataka Protection of Interests of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act, 2004 (Karnataka Act

No.30 of 2005);

(b)

Attempts, abetments and conspiracies in relation to or in connection with the above mentioned

offences and any other offence or offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising

out of the same facts.

[F. No. 228/23/2019 –AVD-II]

S. P. R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7115

वा

वा य

य

य और परवार क या

और परवार क या

और परवार क याण मंालय

ण मंालय

( वा

वा

वा य

य

य और प रवार क या

और प रवार क या

और प रवार क याण िवभाग

ण िवभाग

ण िवभाग)

नई द ली, 5 अैल, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 1804

1804

1804.—भारतीय आयुUवVान पWरषद अिधिनयम,1956 (1956 का 102) क धारा 11 क उप- धारा

(2) ;ारा -दR त शि1 तय का -योग करते &ए के3 ! सरकार, भारतीय आयुUवVान पWरषद से परामश, करके उ=

अिधिनयम क -थम अनुसूची म, िन@िलिखत, और संशोधन करती है, अथा,त :-

उ= -थम अनुसूची म ‘मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता’ [िजसे इसके आगे कालम(2) कहा गया है] शीष,क के अधीन

“डॉ. राम मनोहर लोिहया अवध िव[िव\ालय, फैजाबाद” के सामने अंितम -िवि] के प^ात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए

संिFिZकरण’ [िजसे इसके आगे कालम(3) कहा गया है] से संबंिधत -िवि] के संबंध म िन@िलिखत अंत:"थािपत कया

जाएगा. अथा,त्:-

(2)

(3)

“डॉ1टर ऑफ मेिडिसन (बॉयोकेिम"bी)”

एमडी (बॉयोकेिम"bी)

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह cहद

इं"टीdूट ऑफ मेिडकल साइंस, बाराबंक म 2017 को या बाद म

-िशिFत कए गए छाO के संबंध म डॉ. राम मनोहर लोिहया

अवध िव[िव\ालय, फैजाबाद ;ारा -द< होगी।)

नोट:

नोट: 1. ऐसी दी गई मा3 यता अिधकतम 5 वष, के िलए होगी और उसके बाद इसका नवीकरण करवाना होगा।

2. मा3यता के ‘नवीकरण’ क -gया वही होगी जो मा3यता -दान करने के िलए लागू होती है।

3. अपेिFत मा3यता का समय से नवीकरण करवाने म िवफल रहने पर, पWरणाम "वhप, िनरपवाद hप से, संबंिधत

iातको<र कोस, म -वेश बंद हो जाएगा।

[सं. यू-12012/44/2019-एमई-I/एफटीएस नं. 3200464]

पी. के. बंदोपाjयाय, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

(Department of Health and Family Welfare)

New Delhi, the 5^th April, 2019

S.O. 1804.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical

Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes

the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

In the said Schedule :-

against “Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Avadh University, Faizabad”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical

Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading

‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:-

7116

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(2)

(3)

“Doctor of Medicine (Biochemistry)”

MD (Biochemistry)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by

Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Avadh University, Faizabad in respect of

students being trained at Hind Institute of Medical Sciences,

Barabanki, on or after 2017).

Note:

The recognition so granted shall be for a maximum period of 5 years from the date of notification, upon

which it shall have to be renewed.

The procedure for ‘Renewal’ of recognition shall be same as applicable for the award for recognition.

Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required shall invariably result in stoppage of admission

to the concerned Postgraduate Courses.

[No. U-12012/44/2019-ME-I/FTS No. 3200464]

P. K. BANDYOPADHYAY, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 22 अ-ैल, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 1805

1805

1805.—भारतीय आयुUवVान पWरषद अिधिनयम,1956 (1956 का 102) क धारा 11 क उप- धारा (2)

;ारा -दR त शि1 तय का -योग करते &ए के3 ! सरकार, भारतीय आयुUवVान पWरषद से परामश, करके उ= अिधिनयम क

-थम अनुसूची म, िन@िलिखत, और संशोधन करती है अथा,त :-

जाएगा. अथा,त्:-

(2)

(3)

“डॉ1टर ऑफ मेिडिसन(कयुिनटी मेिडिसन)”

एमडी (कयुिनटी मेिडिसन)

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह cहद

इं"टीdूट ऑफ मेिडकल साइंस, बाराबंक म 2016 को या बाद म

-िशिFत कए गए छाO के संबंध म डॉ. राम मनोहर लोिहया

अवध िव[िव\ालय, फैजाबाद ;ारा -द< होगी।)

नोट:

2. मा3यता के ‘नवीकरण’ क -gया वही होगी जो मा3यता -दान करने के िलए लागू होती है।

3. अपेिFत मा3यता का समय से नवीकरण करवाने म िवफल रहने पर, पWरणाम"वhप, िनरपवाद hप से, संबंिधत

iातको<र कोस, म -वेश बंद हो जाएगा।

[सं. यू-12012/168/2019-एमई-I/एफटीएस नं. 3206932]

पी. के. बंदोपाjयाय, अवर सिचव

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7117

New Delhi, the 22^nd April, 2019

S.O. 1805.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical

Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes

the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

In the said Schedule :-

against “Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Avadh University, Faizabad”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical

Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading

‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(2)

(3)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“Doctor of Medicine (Community Medicine)”

MD (Community Medicine)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by

Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Avadh University, Faizabad in respect of

students being trained at Hind Institute of Medical Sciences,

Barabanki, on or after 2016).

Note:

The recognition so granted shall be for a maximum period of 5 years from the date of notification, upon

which it shall have to be renewed.

The procedure for ‘Renewal’ of recognition shall be same as applicable for the award for recognition.

Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required shall invariably result in stoppage of admission to

the concerned Postgraduate Courses.

[No. U-12012/168/2019-ME-I/FTS No. 3206932]

P.K. BANDYOPADHYAY, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 22 अ-ैल, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 1806

1806

1806.—भारतीय आयुUवVान पWरषद अिधिनयम,1956(1956 का 102) क धारा 11 क उप धारा(2)

-थम अनुसूची म, िन@िलिखत, और संशोधन करती है, अथा,त्:

उ= -थम अनुसूची म

।) ‘मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता’शीष,क के अधीन [िजसे इसके आगे कालम(2) कहा गया है] “राज"थान "वा"Qय

िवVान िव[िव\ालय, जयपुर” के सामने अंितम -िवि] के प^ात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए संिFिZकरण’ [िजसे इसके आगे

कालम(3) कहा गया है] से संबंिधत -िवि] के संबंध म िन@िलिखत अंत:"थािपत कया जाएगा. अथा,त्:-

(2)

(3)

“डॉ1टर ऑफ मेिडिसन (माइgोबॉयलोजी)”

एमडी (माइgोबॉयलोजी)

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह झालावाड़

मेिडकल कॉलेज, झालवाड़ म -िशिFत कए जा रहे छाO के संबंध म

2017 को या बाद म राज"थान "वा"Qय िवVान िव[िव\ालय,

जयपुर ;ारा -द< होगी।)

“डॉ1टर ऑफ मेिडिसन (जनरल मेिडिसन)”

एमडी (जनरल मेिडिसन)

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह झालावाड़

मेिडकल कॉलेज, झालवाड़ म -िशिFत कए जा रहे छाO के संबंध म

7118

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2018 को या बाद म राज"थान "वा"Qय िवVान िव[िव\ालय,

जयपुर ;ारा -द< होगी।)

“मा"टर ऑफ सज,री (आkस"टेWb1स एंड

गायनेकॉलोजी)”

एमएस (ओबीजी)

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह झालावाड़

मेिडकल कॉलेज, झालवाड़ म -िशिFत कए जा रहे छाO के संबंध म

2018 को या बाद म राज"थान "वा"Qय िवVान िव[िव\ालय,

जयपुर ;ारा -द< होगी।)

“डॉ1टर ऑफ मेिडिसन (िपिडयाWb1स)”

एमडी (िपिडयाWb1स)

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह झालावाड़

मेिडकल कॉलेज, झालवाड़ म -िशिFत कए जा रहे छाO के संबंध म

2018 को या बाद म राज"थान "वा"Qय िवVान िव[िव\ालय,

जयपुर ;ारा -द< होगी।)

नोट:

दी गई ऐसी मा3यता अिधसूचना क तारीख से अिधकतम 5 वष, के िलए होगी और उसके बाद इसका नवीकरण

करवाना होगा।

मा3यता के ‘नवीकरण’ क -gया वही होगी जो मा3यता -दान करने के िलए लागू होती है।

अपेिFत मा3यता का समय से नवीकरण करवाने म िवफल रहने पर,पWरणाम"वhप, िनरपवाद hप से संबंिधत

iातको<र कोस, म -वेश बंद हो जाएगा।

[सं. यू-12012/121/2019-एमई-1/एफटीएस नं. 3206178]

पी. के. बंदोपाjयाय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 22^nd April, 2019

S.O. 1806.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical

Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes

the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

In the said Schedule :-

against “Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical

Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading

‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(2)

(3)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“Doctor of Medicine (Microbiology)”

MD (Microbiology)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by

Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur in respect of

students being trained at Jhalawar Medical College, Jhalawar on or

after 2017).

“Doctor of Medicine (General Medicine)”

MD (General Medicine)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by

Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur in respect of

students being trained at Jhalawar Medical College, Jhalawar on or

after 2018).

“Master of Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynaecology)”

MS (OBG)

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7119

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by

Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur in respect of

students being trained at Jhalawar Medical College, Jhalawar on or

after 2018).

“Doctor of Medicine (Paediatrics)”

MD (Paediatrics)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by

Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur in respect of

students being trained at Jhalawar Medical College, Jhalawar on or

after 2018).

Note:

The recognition so granted shall be for a maximum period of 5 years from the date of notification, upon

which it shall have to be renewed.

The procedure for ‘Renewal’ of recognition shall be same as applicable for the award for recognition.

Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required shall invariably result in stoppage of admission to

the concerned Postgraduate Courses.

[No. U-12012/121/2019-ME-I/FTS No. 3206178]

P.K. BANDYOPADHYAY, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 9 मई, 2019

का. आ.

का. आ. 1807.

1807.

1807.-—भारतीय आयुUवVान पWरषद अिधिनयम,1956 (1956 का 102) क धारा 11 क उप धारा (2)

-थम अनुसूची म, िन@िलिखत, और संशोधन करती है, अथा,त्:-

उ= -थम अनुसूची म ‘मा3 यता-ाp त आयुUवVान अह,ता’ [िजसे इसके आगे कालम (2) कहा गया है] शीष,क के

अधीन, ‘’केरल यूिनवUसटी ऑफ है थ साqसेज, िrसुर’’ के सामने अंितम -िवि] के पs चात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए

संिFिZकरण’ [िजसे इसके आगे कालम (3) कहा गया है] से संबंिधत -िवि] के संबंध म िन निलिखत अंत:" थािपत कया

जाएगा अथा,त :–

(2)

(3)

“बैचलर ऑफ मेिडिसन एंड बेचलर ऑफ सज,री”

एमबीबीएस

(यह एक मा3यता-ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह

माउंट िज़योन मेिडकल कॉलेज पाथानमिथtा म 100

एमबीबीएस छाO के वाUषक -वेश के साथ -िशिFत

कए जा रहे छाO के संबंध म फरवरी, 2019 को या बाद

म केरल यूिनवUसटी ऑफ है थ साqसेज, िOशूर ;ारा

-द< होगी)।

नोट:

एमबीबीएस िडuी -दान करने हेतु " नातको<र पाvgम को दी गई ऐसी मा3 यता अिधकतम 5 वष, के िलए होगी

और उसके बाद इसका नवीकरण करवाना होगा।

मा3यता के ‘नवीकरण’ क -gया वही होगी जो मा3यता -दान करने के िलए लागू होती है।

3. अपेिFत मा3यता का समय से नवीकरण करवाने म िवफल रहने पर,पWरणाम "वhप, िनरपवाद hप से संबंिधत

" नातको<र पाvgम म -वेश बंद हो जाएगा।

[सं. यू-12012/192/2019-एमई-1/एफटीएस नं. 8006678]

पी. के. बंदोपाjयाय, अवर सिचव

7120

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 9^th May, 2019

S.O. 1807.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical

Council Act, 1956(102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes

the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act:

In the said First Schedule after “Kerala University of Health Sciences, Thrissur” and under the heading

‘Recognized Medical Qualification’ [Hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto

under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration” [Hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted,

namely:-

(2)

(3)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bachelor of Medicine and

M.B.B.S.

Bachelor of Surgery

This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by

Kerala University of Health Sciences, Thrissur in respect of

students being trained at Mount Zion Medical College,

Pathanamthitta with annual intake of 100 MBBS students on or

after February, 2019.

Note: 1. The recognition so granted to an undergraduate courses for award of MBBS degree shall be for a maximum

period of 5 years, upon which it shall have to be renewed.

2. The procedure for ‘Renewal’ of recognition shall be same as applicable for the award for recognition.

3. Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required shall invariably result in stoppage of admissions to

the concerned undergraduate Course.

[No. U-12012/192/2019-ME-I /FTS No. 8006678]

P. K. BANDYOPADHYAY, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 9 मई, 2019

का

का.आ.

आ.

आ. 1808

1808

1808.—भारतीय आयुUवVान पWरषद अिधिनयम,1956(1956 का 102) क धारा 11 क उप धारा (2)

;ारा -दR त शि1 तय का -योग करते &ए, के3 ! सरकार, भारतीय आयुUवVान पWरषद से परामश, करके उ= अिधिनयम क

-थम अनुसूची म, िन@िलिखत, और संशोधन करती है, अथा,त्:-

उ= -थम अनुसूची म ‘मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता’ [िजसे इसके आगे कालम (2) कहा गया है] शीष,क के अधीन

“डॉ

डॉ

डॉ. . . . बी

बी

बी आर

आर

आर आंबेडकर

आंबेडकर

आंबेडकर िव व

िव व

िव विवालय

िवालय

िवालय, , , , आगरा

आगरा

आगरा” के सामने अंितम -िवि] के प^ात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए संिFिZकरण’

[िजसे इसके आगे कालम (3) कहा गया है] से संबंिधत -िवि] के संबंध म िन@िलिखत अंत:"थािपत कया जाएगा. अथा,त्:-

(2)

(3)

बैचलर ऑफ मेिडिसन एw ड बैचलर ऑफ सज,री

एम.बी.बी.एस.

(यह एक मा3यता-ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह एफ.एच.

मेिडकल कॉलेज, आगरा म 150 एमबीबीएस छाO के वाUषक

-वेश के साथ -िशिFत कए जा रहे छाO के संबंध म फरवरी,

2019 को या बाद म डॉ. बी.आर. अ बेडकर िवs वि\ालय,

आगरा ;ारा -द< होगी)।

नोट:

नोट: 1. एमबीबीएस िडuी -दान करने हेतु " नातको<र पाvgम को दी गई ऐसी मा3 यता अिधकतम 5 वष, के िलए होगी

और उसके बाद इसका नवीकरण करवाना होगा।

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7121

2. मा3यता के ‘नवीकरण’ क -gया वही होगी जो मा3यता -दान करने के िलए लागू होती है।

3. अपेिFत मा3यता का समय से नवीकरण करवाने म िवफल रहने पर, पWरणाम"वhप, िनरपवाद hप से संबंिधत

" नातको<र पाvgम म -वेश बंद हो जाएगा।

[सं. यू-12012/181/2019-एमई-I/एफटीएस-8006310]

पी. के. बंदोपाjयाय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 9th May, 2019

S.O. 1808.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical

Council Act, 1956(102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes

the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act:

In the said First Schedule after “Dr. B R Ambedkar University, Agra” and under the heading ‘Recognized

Medical Qualification’ [Hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the

heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration” [Hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(2)

(3)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bachelor of Medicine and

M.B.B.S.

Bachelor of Surgery

This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by

Dr. B R Ambedkar University, Agra in respect of students being

trained at F.H. Medical College, Agra with annual intake of 150

MBBS students on or after February, 2019.

Note: 1. The recognition so granted to an undergraduate courses for award of MBBS degree shall be for a maximum

period of 5 years, upon which it shall have to be renewed.

2. The procedure for ‘Renewal’ of recognition shall be same as applicable for the award for recognition.

3. Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required shall invariably result in stoppage of admissions to

the concerned undergraduate Course.

[No. U-12012/181/2019-ME-I/ FTS No. 8006310]

P. K. BANDYOPADHYAY, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 27 मई, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 1809

1809

1809.—भारतीय आयुUवVान पWरषद अिधिनयम,1956 (1956 का 102) क धारा 11 क उप धारा(2)

-थम अनुसूची म, िन@िलिखत, और संशोधन करती है, अथा,त्:-

उ= -थम अनुसूची म ‘मा3यता-ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता’ [िजसे इसके आगे कालम(2) कहा गया है] शीष,क के अधीन “पैिसफक

मेिडकल यूिनवUसटी, उदयपुर” के सामने अंितम -िवि] के प^ात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए संिFिZकरण’ [िजसे इसके आगे

(2)

(3)

बैचुलर ऑफ मेिडिसन और बैचलर ऑफ सज,री

एम.बी.बी.एस.

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह पैिसफक

मेिडकल कॉलेज एंड हॉि"पटल, उदयपुर म 150 एमबीबीएस

छाO के -वेश के साथ -िशिFत कए जा रहे छाO के संबंध म

7122

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

जनवरी, 2019 को या बाद म पैिसफक मेिडकल यूिनवUसटी,

उदयपुर ;ारा -द< होगी)।

नोट:

और उसके बाद इसका नवीकरण करवाना होगा।

2. मा3यता के ‘नवीकरण’ क -gया वही होगी जो मा3यता -दान करने के िलए लागू होती है।

3. अपेिFत मा3यता का समय से नवीकरण करवाने म िवफल रहने पर,पWरणाम "वhप,िनरपवाद hप से संबंिधत

" नातको<र पाvgम म -वेश बंद हो जाएगा।

[सं. यू-12012/212/2019-एमई-I/एफटीएस नं. 8008181]

पी. के. बंदोपाjयाय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 27th May, 2019

S.O. 1809.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical

Council Act, 1956(102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes

the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act:

In the said First Schedule after “Pacific Medical University, Udaipur” and under the heading ‘Recognized

Medical Qualification’ [Hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the

heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration” [Hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(2)

(3)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bachelor of Medicine and

M.B.B.S.

Bachelor of Surgery

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by

Pacific Medical University, Udaipur in respect of students being

trained at Pacific Medical College & Hospital, Udaipur with annual

intake of 150 MBBS students on or after January, 2019.)

Note: 1. The recognition so granted to an undergraduate courses for award of MBBS degree shall be for a maximum

period of 5 years, upon which it shall have to be renewed.

2. The procedure for ‘Renewal’ of recognition shall be same as applicable for the award for recognition.

3. Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required shall invariably result in stoppage of admissions to

the concerned undergraduate Course.

[No .U-12012/212/2019-ME-I /FTS No. 8008181]

P. K. BANDYOPADHYAY, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 27 मई, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 1810

1810

1810.—भारतीय आयुUवVान पWरषद अिधिनयम,1956 (1956 का 102) क धारा 11 क उप धारा(2)

-थम अनुसूची म, िन@िलिखत, और संशोधन करती है, अथा,त्:-

उ= -थम अनुसूची म ‘मा3यता-ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता’ [िजसे इसके आगे कालम(2) कहा गया है] शीष,क के अधीन

“MkW- ,uVhvkj ;wfuoflZVh vkWQ gSYFk lkbalst] fot;okM+k” के सामने अंितम -िवि] के प^ात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7123

जाएगा. अथा,त्:-

(2)

(3)

बैचलर ऑफ मेिडिसन और बैचलर ऑफ सज,री

एम.बी.बी.एस.

(यह एक मा3यता-ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह

िव[भारती मेिडकल कॉलेज, कुनु,ल म 150 एमबीबीएस

छाO के वाUषक -वेश के साथ -िशिFत कए जा रहे

छाO के संबंध म फरवरी, 2019 को या बाद म

डॉ. एनटीआर यूिनवUसटी ऑफ है थ साइंसेज,

िवजयवाड़ा ;ारा -द< होगी)।

नोट:

और उसके बाद इसका नवीकरण करवाना होगा।

2. मा3यता के ‘नवीकरण’ क -gया वही होगी जो मा3यता -दान करने के िलए लागू होती है।

अधोiातक कोस, म -वेश बंद हो जाएगा।

[सं. यू-12012/213/2019-एमई-I/एफटीएस नं. 8008169]

पी. के. बंदोपाjयाय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 27^th May, 2019

S.O. 1810.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical

Council Act, 1956(102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes

the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act:

In the said First Schedule after “Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada” and under the heading

‘Recognized Medical Qualification’ [Hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto

under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration” [Hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted,

namely:-

(2)

(3)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bachelor of Medicine and

M.B.B.S.

Bachelor of Surgery

This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by

Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada in respect of

students being trained at Vishwabharathi Medical College, Kurnool

with annual intake of 150 MBBS students on or after February,

2019.

Note: 1. The recognition so granted to an undergraduate courses for award of MBBS degree shall be for a maximum

period of 5 years, upon which it shall have to be renewed.

2. The procedure for ‘Renewal’ of recognition shall be same as applicable for the award for recognition.

3. Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required shall invariably result in stoppage of admissions to

the concerned undergraduate Course.

[No. U-12012/213/2019-ME-I/FTS No. 8008169]

P. K. BANDYOPADHYAY, Under Secy.

7124

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नई द ली, 19 अग" त, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 1811

1811

1811.—भारतीय आयुUवVान पWरषद अिधिनयम,1956 (1956 का 102) क धारा 11 क उप धारा (2)

-थम अनुसूची म, िन@िलिखत, और संशोधन करती है।

उ= -थम अनुसूची म-

क)

‘मा3यता-ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता’ शीष,क के अधीन [िजसे इसके आगे कालम (2) कहा गया है] “केएनआर "वा"Qय

िवVान िव[िव\ालय, वारंगल, तेलंगाना” के सामने अंितम -िवि] के प^ात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए संिFिZकरण’ [िजसे

इसके आगे कालम(3) कहा गया है] से संवंिधत -िवि] के संबंध म िन@िलिखत अंत:"थािपत कया जाएगा. अथा,त्:-

(2)

(3)

‘डॉ1टर ऑफ मेिडिसन (जनरल मेिडिसन)”

एमडी(जनरल मेिडिसन)

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह

भा"कर मेिडकल कॉलेज, ये3कापली म 2019 को या बाद म

-िशिFत कए गए छाO के संबंध म केएनआर "वा"Qय िवVान

िव[िव\ालय, वारंगल, तेलंगाना ;ारा -द< होगी।)

‘मा"टर ऑफ सज,री (इएनटी)”

एमएस(इएनटी)

(यह एक मा3यता-ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह भा"कर

मेिडकल कॉलेज, ये3कापली म 2019 को या बाद म -िशिFत

कए गए छाO के संबंध म केएनआर "वा"Qय िवVान

िव[िव\ालय, वारंगल, तेलंगाना ;ारा -द< होगी।)

ख)

‘मा3यता-ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता’ शीष,क के अधीन[िजसे इसके आगे कालम(2) कहा गया है]] “एचएनबी गढ़वाल

िव[िव\ालय, उ<राखंड” के सामने अंितम -िवि] के प^ात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए संिFिZकरण’ [िजसे इसके आगे

कालम(3) कहा गया है] से संवंिधत -िवि] के संबंध म िन@िलिखत अंत:"थािपत कया जाएगा. अथा,त्:-

(2)

(3)

”डॉ1टर ऑफ मेिडिसन (साइकयाbी)”

एमडी (साइकयाbी)

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह

$ी गुh राम राय इं"टीdूट ऑफ मेिडकल एंड हैथ

सांइिसस, $ी महंत इं!ेश हॉि"पटल, देहरादून म 2019

को या बाद म -िशिFत कए गए छाO के संबंध म

एचएनबी गढ़वाल िव[िव\ालय, उ<राखंड ;ारा -द<

होगी।)

ग)

‘मा3यता-ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता’ शीष,क के अधीन [िजसे इसके आगे कालम(2) कहा गया है] “पांिडxेरी

िव[िव\ालय, पुyदुचेरी” के सामने अंितम -िवि] के प^ात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए संिFिZकरण’ [िजसे इसके आगे

(2)

(3)

‘”मा"टर ऑफ सज,री (जनरल सज,री)”

एमएस (जनरल सज,री)

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7125

होगी जब यह $ी मनकुला िवनयगार मेिडकल एंड

अ"पताल, पांिडxेरी म 2019 को या बाद म -िशिFत

कए गए छाO के संबंध म पांिडxेरी िव[िव\ालय,

पुyदुचेरी ;ारा -द< होगी।)

घ) ‘मा3यता-ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता’ शीष,क के अधीन [िजसे इसके आगे कालम(2) कहा गया है] “केएसकेवी कzछ

िव[िव\ालय, भुज” के सामने अंितम -िवि] के प^ात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए संिFिZकरण’ [िजसे इसके आगे

”डॉ1टर ऑफ मेिडिसन(पेथॉलोजी)”

एमडी (पेथॉलोजी)

(यह एक मा3यता-ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह

गुजरात अडानी इं"टीdूट ऑफ मेिडकल सांइिसस, भुज म

2019 को या बाद म -िशिFत कए गए छाO के संबंध म

केएसकेवी कzछ िव[िव\ालय, भुज ;ारा -द< होगी।)

नोट:

नोट: क.

दी गई ऐसी मा3यता अिधसूचना क तारीख से अिधकतम 5 वष, के िलए होगी और उसके बाद इसके नवीकरण

के िलए आवेदन देना होगा।

ख.

अपेिFत मा3यता का समय से नवीकरण करवाने म िवफल रहने पर, पWरणाम"वhप, िनरपवाद hप से,

संबंिधत iातको<र कोस, म -वेश बंद हो जाएगा।

[सं. यू-12012/367/2019-एमई-I/एफटीएस नं.8020809]

पी. के. बंदोपाjयाय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 19^th August, 2019

S.O. 1811.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical

Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes

the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

In the said Schedule -

against “KNR University of Health Sciences, Warangal, Telangana”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical

Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2) ], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading

‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(2)

(3)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“Doctor of Medicine (General Medicine)”

MD (General Medicine)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by

KNR University of Health Sciences, Warangal, Telangana in

respect of students being trained at Bhaskar Medical College,

Yenkapally on or after 2019).

“Master of Surgery (Otorhinolaryngology)”

MS (ENT)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by

KNR University of Health Sciences, Warangal, Telangana in

respect of students being trained at Bhaskar Medical College,

Yenkapally on or after 2019).

7126

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(b)

against “H.N.B. Garhwal University, Uttarakhand”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical Qualification’

[hereinafter referred to as column (2) ], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for

Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(2)

(3)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“Doctor of Medicine (Psychiatry)”

MD (Psychiatry)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by

H.N.B. Garhwal University, Uttarakhand in respect of students

being trained at Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical & Health

Sciences, Shri Mahant Indiresh Hospital, Dehradun on or after

2019).

against “Pondicherry University, Puducherry”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical Qualification’

[hereinafter referred to as column (2) ], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for

Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(2)

(3)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“Master of Surgery (General Surgery)”

MS (General Surgery)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when

granted by Pondicherry University, Puducherry in respect

of students being trained at Sri Manakula Vinayagar

Medical College & Hospital, Pondicherry on or after

2019).

against “KSKV Kachchh University, Bhuj”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter

referred to as column (2) ], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for

Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(2)

(3)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“Doctor of Medicine (Pathology)”

MD (Pathology)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by

KSKV Kachchh University, Bhuj in respect of students being

trained at Gujarat Adani Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhuj on or

after 2019)

Note: a. The recognition so granted shall be for a maximum period of 5 years from the date of Notification upon

which the Institute shall have to apply for renewal of recognition.

b. Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required shall invariably result in stoppage of admission to

the Postgraduate Course.

[No. U-12012/367/2019-ME-I/FTS No. 8020809]

P. K. BANDYOPADHYAY, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 22 अग" त, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 1812

1812

1812.—भारतीय आयुUवVान पWरषद अिधिनयम,1956(1956 का 102) क धारा 11 क उप धारा(2)

-थम अनुसूची म, िन@िलिखत, और संशोधन करती है:—

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7127

उ= -थम अनुसूची म—

(क)

‘मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता’शीष,क के अधीन[िजसे इसके आगे कालम(2) कहा गया है] “पंजाब िवs विव\ालय,

चंडीगढ़” के सामने अंितम -िवि] के पs चात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए संिFिZकरण’ [िजसे इसके आगे कालम(3) कहा गया है]

से संवंिधत -िवि] के संबंध म िन@िलिखत अंत:"थािपत कया जाएगा. अथा,त्:—

(2)

(3)

”डॉ1टर ऑफ मेिडिसन (पेिडयाWb1स)”

एमडी (पेिडयाWb1स)

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह

गवन,मट मेिडकल कॉलेज, चंडीगढ़ म 2019 को या बाद म

-िशिFत

कए

गए छाO

के

संबंध

म

पंजाब

िवs विव\ालय, चंडीगढ़ ;ारा -द< होगी।)

”डॉ1टर ऑफ मेिडिसन (रेिडयो डॉय{ोिसस / रेिडयॉलोजी)”

एमडी (रेिडयो डॉय{ोिसस / रेिडयॉलोजी)

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह

गवन,मट मेिडकल कॉलेज, चंडीगढ़ म 2019 को या बाद म

-िशिFत

कए

गए छाO

के

संबंध

म

पंजाब

िवs विव\ालय, चंडीगढ़ ;ारा -द< होगी।)

‘डॉ1टर ऑफ मेिडिसन (बायो-केिम"bी)”

एमडी(बायो-केिम"bी)

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह

गवन,मट मेिडकल कॉलेज, चंडीगढ़ म 2019 को या बाद म

-िशिFत कए गए छाO के संबंध म पंजाब िव[िव\ालय,

चंडीगढ़ ;ारा -द< होगी।)

(ख)

‘मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता’ शीष,क के अधीन [िजसे इसके आगे कालम(2) कहा गया है] “केएसकेवी कzछ

िवs विव\ालय, भुज” के सामने अंितम -िवि] के पs चात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए संिFिZकरण’ [िजसे इसके आगे

कालम(3) कहा गया है] से संवंिधत -िवि] के संबंध म िन@िलिखत अंत:"थािपत कया जाएगा. अथा,त्:—

(2)

(3)

‘‘डॉ1टर ऑफ मेिडिसन (डमा,टॉलोजी, वेनरेयोलॉजी एंड

लेपरसी)”

एमडी(डीवीएल )

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह

गुजरात अडानी इं"टीdूट ऑफ मेिडकल सांइिसस, भुज

म 2019 को या बाद म -िशिFत कए गए छाO के

संबंध म केएसकेवी कzछ िवs विव\ालय, भुज ;ारा

-द< होगी।)

’’डॉ1टर ऑफ मेिडिसन(dुबर1युलोिसस एंड रे"पीरटरी

िडिसस/pलमोनरी मेिडिसन)”

एमडी(dुबर1युलोिसस

एंड

रे"पीरटरी

िडिसस/

pलमोनरी मेिडिसन

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह

गवन,मट मेिडकल कॉलेज, चंडीगढ़ म 2019 को या

बाद म -िशिFत कए गए छाO के संबंध म पंजाब

िवs विव\ालय, चंडीगढ़ ;ारा -द< होगी।)

(ग)

‘मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता’ शीष,क के अधीन [िजसे इसके आगे कालम(2) कहा गया है] “पांिडचेरी

िवs विव\ालय, पुyदुचेरी” के सामने अंितम -िवि] के पs चात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए संिFिZकरण’ [िजसे इसके आगे

7128

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(2)

(3)

”मा"टर ऑफ सज,री (ओटोरिहनोले~रगोलॉजी)”

एमएस(इएनटी)

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह

$ी व1टेs वर मेिडकल कॉलेज, अ"पताल एंड Wरसच,

सटर, पांिडचेरी म 2019 को या बाद म -िशिFत कए

गए छाO के संबंध म पांिडचेरी िवs विव\ालय,

पुyदुचेरी ;ारा -द< होगी।)

‘‘डॉ1टर ऑफ मेिडिसन (साइकयाbी)”

एमडी (साइकयाbी)

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह

$ी व1टेs वर मेिडकल कॉलेज, अ"पताल एंड Wरसच,

सटर, पांिडचेरी म 2019 को या बाद म -िशिFत कए

गए छाO के संबंध म पांिडचेरी िवs विव\ालय,

पुyदुचेरी ;ारा -द< होगी।)

(घ)

‘मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता’ शीष,क के अधीन [िजसे इसके आगे कालम(2) कहा गया है] “इंदरा गांधी

इं"टीdूट ऑफ मेिडकल सांइिसस (डीड िवs विव\ालय), पटना” के सामने अंितम -िवि] के पs चात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए

संिFिZकरण’ [िजसे इसके आगे कालम (3) कहा गया है] से संवंिधत -िवि] के संबंध म िन@िलिखत अंत:"थािपत कया

जाएगा. अथा,त्:-

(2)

(3)

”डॉ1टर ऑफ मेिडिसन (फामा,कॉलोजी)”

एमडी(फामा,क़लोजी)

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह

इंदरा गांधी इं"टीdूट ऑफ मेिडकल सांइिसस, शेखपुरा,

पटना म 2019 को या बाद म -िशिFत कए गए छाO

के संबंध म इंदरा गांधी इं"टीdूट ऑफ मेिडकल सांइिसस

(डीड िवs विव\ालय), पटना ;ारा -द< होगी।)

‘‘डॉ1टर ऑफ मेिडिसन (फारिसक मेिडिसन)”

एमडी(फारिसक मेिडिसन)

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह

इंदरा गांधी इं"टीdूट ऑफ मेिडकल सांइिसस, शेखपुरा,

पटना म 2019 को या बाद म -िशिFत कए गए छाO

के संबंध म इंदरा गांधी इं"टीdूट ऑफ मेिडकल सांइिसस

(डीड िवs विव\ालय), पटना ;ारा -द< होगी।)

नोट:

क. दी गई ऐसी मा3यता अिधसूचना क तारीख से अिधकतम 5 वष, के िलए होगी और उसके बाद इसके नवीकरण

के िलए आवेदन देना होगा।

ख. अपेिFत मा3यता का समय से नवीकरण करवाने म िवफल रहने पर, पWरणाम"वhप, िनरपवाद hप से,

संबंिधत iातको<र कोस, म -वेश बंद हो जाएगा।

[सं. यू-12012/375/2019-एमई-I/एफटीएस नं. 8021899]

पी. के. बंदोपाjयाय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 22nd August, 2019

S.O. 1812.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical

Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes

the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:—

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7129

In the said Schedule -

(a)

against “Punjab University, Chandigarh”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter

referred to as column (2) ], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for

Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:—

(2)

(3)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“Doctor of Medicine (Paediatrics)”

MD (Paediatrics)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification

when granted by Punjab University, Chandigarh in

respect of students being trained at Government

Medical College, Chandigarh on or after 2019).

“Doctor of Medicine (Radio Diagnosis/ Radiology)”

MD (Radio Diagnosis/ Radiology)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification

when granted by Punjab University, Chandigarh in

respect of students being trained at Government

Medical College, Chandigarh on or after 2019).

“Doctor of Medicine (Bio-Chemistry)”

MD (Bio-Chemistry)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification

when granted by Punjab University, Chandigarh in

respect of students being trained at Government

Medical College, Chandigarh on or after 2019).

(b)

against “KSKV Kachchh University, Bhuj”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter

referred to as column (2) ], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for

Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:—

(2)

(3)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“Doctor of Medicine (Dermatology, Venereology & Leprosy)”

MD (DVL)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification

when granted by KSKV Kachchh University, Bhuj

in respect of students being trained at Gujarat Adani

Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhuj on or after

2019).

“Doctor of Medicine (Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases/

Pulmonary Medicine)”

(Tuberculosis

Respiratory

Diseases/

Pulmonary Medicine)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification

when granted by KSKV Kachchh University, Bhuj

in respect of students being trained at Gujarat Adani

Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhuj on or after

2019).

(c)

against “Pondicherry University, Puducherry”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical Qualification’

[hereinafter referred to as column (2) ], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for

Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:-

7130

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(2)

(3)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“Master of Surgery (Otorhinolaryngology)”

MS (ENT)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification

when

granted

Pondicherry

University,

Puducherry in respect of students being trained at

Sri Venkateswaraa Medical College, Hospital &

Research Centre, Pondicherry on or after 2019).

“Doctor of Medicine (Psychiatry)”

MD (Psychiatry)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification

when

granted

Pondicherry

University,

Puducherry in respect of students being trained at

Sri Venkateswaraa Medical College, Hospital &

Research Centre, Pondicherry on or after 2019).

(d)

against “Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed University), Patna”, under the heading

‘Recognized Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2) ], after the last entry and entry relating thereto

under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be

inserted, namely:-

(2)

(3)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“Doctor of Medicine (Pharmacology)”

MD (Pharmacology)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification

when granted by Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical

Sciences (Deemed University), Patna in respect of

students being trained at Indira Gandhi Institute of

Medical Sciences, Sheikhpura, Patna on or after

2019).

“Doctor of Medicine (Forensic Medicine)”

MD (Forensic Medicine)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification

when granted by Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical

Sciences (Deemed University), Patna in respect of

students being trained at Indira Gandhi Institute of

Medical Sciences, Sheikhpura, Patna on or after

2019).

Note: a.

The recognition so granted shall be for a maximum period of 5 years from the date of Notification

upon which the Institute shall have to apply for renewal of recognition.

Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required shall invariably result in stoppage of

admission to the Postgraduate Course.

[No. U-12012/375/2019-ME-I/FTS No. 8021899]

P. K. BANDYOPADHYAY, Under Secy.

नई द ी, 22 अग" त, 2019

का.

का. आ.

आ.

आ. 1813

1813

1813.—भारतीय आयुUवVान पWरषद अिधिनयम,1956(1956 का 102) क धारा 11 क उप धारा(2)

;ारा -दR त शि1 तय का -योग करते &ए के3 ! सरकार, भारतीय आयुUवVान पWरषद से परामश, करके उ1 त अिधिनयम क

-थम अनुसूची म, िन@िलिखत, और संशोधन करती है अथा,त:—

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7131

उ= -थम अनुसूची म

(क)

‘मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता’शीष,क के अधीन [िजसे इसके आगे कालम(2) कहा गया है] “द तिमलनाडु

डॉ.एम.जी.आर. मेिडकल िवs विव\ालय, चे€ई” के सामने अंितम -िवि] के पs चात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए संिFिZकरण’

[िजसे इसके आगे कालम(3) कहा गया है] से संवंिधत -िवि] के संबंध म िन@िलिखत अंत:"थािपत कया जाएगा. अथा,त्:—

(2)

(3)

“डॉ1टर ऑफ मेिडिसन (फामा,कॉलोजी)”

एमडी(फामा,कॉलोजी)

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह

कारपगम फेकटी ऑफ मेिडकल सांइिसस एंड Wरसच,

कोयंब<ूर म 2019 को या बाद म -िशिFत कए गए छाO

के संबंध म द तिमलनाडु डॉ.एम.जी.आर. मेिडकल

िवs विव\ालय, चे€ई ;ारा -द< होगी।

“डॉ1टर ऑफ मेिडिसन (कयुिनटी मेिडिसन)”

एमडी(कयुिनटी मेिडिसन)

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह

कारपगम फेकटी ऑफ मेिडकल सांइिसस एंड Wरसच,

कोयंब<ूर म 2019 को या बाद म -िशिFत कए गए छाO

के संबंध म द तिमलनाडु डॉ.एम.जी.आर. मेिडकल

िवs विव\ालय, चे€ई ;ारा -द< होगी)।

(ख)

‘मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता’शीष,क के अधीन [िजसे इसके आगे कालम(2) कहा गया है] “राजीव गांधी "वा"Qय

िवVान िवs विव\ालय, बगलूर” के सामने अंितम -िवि] के पs चात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए संिFिZकरण’ [िजसे इसके आगे

(2)

(3)

“डॉ1टर ऑफ मेिडिसन (साइकयॉbी)”

एमडी(साइकयॉbी)

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह एम

एस रामया मेिडकल कॉलेज, बगलूर म 2019 को या बाद म

-िशिFत कए गए छाO के संबंध म राजीव गांधी "वा"Qय

िवVान िवs विव\ालय, बगलूर ;ारा -द< होगी।)

“डॉ1टर ऑफ मेिडिसन/मा"टर ऑफ सज,री (अk"टेWb1स एंड

गायनेकॉलोजी)”

एमडी/एमएस(ओबीजी)

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह

खाजा बंदा नवाज इं"टीdूट ऑफ मेिडकल सांइिसस,

गुलबगा, म 2019 को या बाद म -िशिFत कए गए छाO के

संबंध म राजीव गांधी "वा"Qय िवVान िवs विव\ालय,

बगलूर ;ारा -द< होगी।)

(ग)

‘मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता’शीष,क के अधीन [िजसे इसके आगे कालम(2) कहा गया है] “इंदरा गांधी "वा"Qय

इं"टीdूट ऑफ मेिडकल सांइिसस (डीड िवs विव\ालय), पटना” के सामने अंितम -िवि] के पs चात प^ात और ‘पंजीकरण

के िलए संिFिZकरण’ [िजसे इसके आगे कालम(3) कहा गया है] से संवंिधत -िवि] के संबंध म िन@िलिखत अंत:"थािपत

कया जाएगा. अथा,त्:—

(2)

(3)

“डॉ1टर ऑफ मेिडिसन (फिज़यॉलोजी)”

एमडी(फिज़यॉलोजी)

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह

7132

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

इंदरा गांधी "वा"Qय इं"टीdूट ऑफ मेिडकल सांइिसस,

शेखपुरा, पटना म 2019 को या बाद म -िशिFत कए गए

छाO के संबंध म इंदरा गांधी "वा"Qय इं"टीdूट ऑफ

मेिडकल सांइिसस (डीड िवs विव\ालय), पटना ;ारा -द<

होगी।)

(घ)

‘मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता’शीष,क के अधीन [िजसे इसके आगे कालम(2) कहा गया है] “राज"थान "वा"Qय

िवVान िवs विव\ालय, जयपुर” के सामने अंितम -िवि] के पs चात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए संिFिZकरण’ [िजसे इसके आगे

(2)

(3)

“डॉ1टर ऑफ मेिडिसन (कयुिनटी मेिडिसन)”

एमडी (कयुिनटी मेिडिसन)

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह

झालावाड़ मेिडकल कॉलेज, झालावाड़ म 2019 को या बाद

म -िशिFत कए गए छाO के संबंध म राज"थान "वा"Qय

िवVान िवs विव\ालय, जयपुर ;ारा -द< होगी।)

नोट:

1. दी गई ऐसी मा3यता अिधसूचना क तारीख से अिधकतम 5 वष, के िलए होगी और उसके बाद इसका नवीकरण

करवाना होगा।

2. मा3यता के ‘नवीकरण’ क -gया वही होगी जो मा3यता -दान करने के िलए लागू होती है।

3. अपेिFत मा3यता का समय से नवीकरण करवाने म िवफल रहने पर, पWरणाम"वhप, िनरपवाद hप से, संबंिधत

iातको<र कोस, म -वेश बंद हो जाएगा।

[सं. यू-12012/405/2019-एमई-I/एफटीएस नं. 8023327]

पी. के. बंदोपाjयाय, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 22nd August, 2019

S.O. 1813.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical

Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes

the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:—

In the said Schedule :-

(a)

against “The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chennai”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical

Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading

‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(2)

(3)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“Doctor of Medicine (Pharmacology)”

MD (Pharmacology)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by

The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chennai in

respect of students being trained at Karpagam Faculty of Medical

Sciences & Research, Coimbatore on or after 2019).

“Doctor of Medicine (Community Medicine)”

MD (Community Medicine)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by

The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chennai in

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7133

respect of students being trained at Karpagam Faculty of Medical

Sciences & Research, Coimbatore on or after 2019).

(b)

against “Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical

Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading

‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:—

(2)

(3)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“Doctor of Medicine (Psychiatry)”

MD (Psychiatry)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by

Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore in respect

of students being trained at M S Ramaiah Medical College,

Bangalore on or after 2019).

“Doctor of Medicine /Master of Surgery

MD/MS (OBG)

(Obstetrics & Gynaecology)”

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by

Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore in respect

of students being trained at Khaja Banda Nawaz Institute of

Medical Sciences, Gulbarga on or after 2019).

(c)

against “Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed University), Patna”, under the heading

‘Recognized Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto

under the heading ‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted,

namely:-

(2)

(3)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“Doctor of Medicine (Physiology)”

MD (Physiology)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by

Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed University),

Patna in respect of students being trained at Indira Gandhi Institute

of Medical Sciences, Sheikhpura Patna on or after 2019).

against “Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical

Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2)], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading

‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:—

(2)

(3)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“Doctor of Medicine (Community Medicine)”

MD (Community Medicine)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by

Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur in respect of

students being trained at Jhalawar Medical College, Jhalawar on or

after 2019).

Note:

The recognition so granted shall be for a maximum period of 5 years from the date of notification, upon which

it shall have to be renewed.

7134

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

The procedure for ‘Renewal’ of recognition shall be same as applicable for the award for recognition.

Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required shall invariably result in stoppage of admission to the

concerned Postgraduate Courses.

[No. U-12012/405/2019-ME-I/FTS No. 8023327]

P.K. BANDYOPADHYAY, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 22 अग" त, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 1814

1814

1814.—भारतीय आयुUवVान पWरषद अिधिनयम,1956(1956 का 102) क धारा 11 क उप धारा(2)

-थम अनुसूची म, िन@िलिखत, और संशोधन करती है अथा,त्:-

उ= -थम अनुसूची म

क)

‘मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता’ शीष,क के अधीन [िजसे इसके आगे कालम(2) कहा गया है] “मjय -देश "वा"Qय

िवVान िव[िव\ालय, जबलपुर” के सामने अंितम -िवि] के प^ात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए संिFिZकरण’ [िजसे इसके आगे

(2)

(3)

“डॉ1टर ऑफ मेिडिसन (पैथॉलोजी)”

एमडी(पैथॉलोजी)

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह िचरायु

मेिडकल कॉलेज एंड अ"पताल, बैरागढ़, भोपाल म 2019 को या

बाद म -िशिFत कए गए छाO के संबंध म मjय -देश "वा"Qय

िवVान िव[िव\ालय, जबलपुर ;ारा -द< होगी।)

ख)

‘मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता’शीष,क के अधीन [िजसे इसके आगे कालम(2) कहा गया है] “गीतांञिल

िव[िव\ालय, उदयपुर” के सामने अंितम -िवि] के प^ात और ‘पंजीकरण के िलए संिFिZकरण’ [िजसे इसके आगे कालम(3)

कहा गया है] से संवंिधत -िवि] के संबंध म िन@िलिखत अंत:"थािपत कया जाएगा. अथा,त्:-

(2)

(3)

“मा"टर ऑफ सज,री (जनरल सज,री)”

एमएस(जनरल सज,री)

(यह एक मा3यता -ाZ आयुUवVान अह,ता होगी जब यह

गीतांञिल मेिडकल कॉलेज एंड अ"पताल, उदयपुर, राज"थान

म 2019 को या बाद म -िशिFत कए गए छाO के संबंध म

गीतांञिल िव[िव\ालय, उदयपुर ;ारा -द< होगी।)

नोट:

करवाना होगा।

2. मा3यता के ‘नवीकरण’ क -gया वही होगी जो मा3यता -दान करने के िलए लागू होती है।

3. अपेिFत मा3यता का समय से नवीकरण करवाने म िवफल रहने पर, पWरणाम"वhप, िनरपवाद hप से, संबंिधत

iातको<र कोस, म -वेश बंद हो जाएगा।

[सं. यू-12012/388/2019-एमई-I/एफटीएस नं. 8022801]

पी. के. बंदोपाjयाय, अवर सिचव

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7135

New Delhi, the 22^nd August, 2019

S.O. 1814.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical

Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes

the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

In the said Schedule -

against “Madhya Pradesh Medical Science University, Jabalpur”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical

Qualification’ [hereinafter referred to as column (2) ], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading

‘Abbreviation for Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(2)

(3)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“Doctor of Medicine (Pathology)”

MD (Pathology)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when

granted

Madhya

Pradesh

Medical

Science

University, Jabalpur in respect of students being trained

at Chirayu Medical College and Hospital, Bairagarh,

Bhopal on or after 2019).

against “Geetanjali University, Udaipur”, under the heading ‘Recognized Medical Qualification’ [hereinafter

referred to as column (2) ], after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ‘Abbreviation for

Registration’ [hereinafter referred to as column (3)], the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(2)

(3)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“Master of Surgery (General Surgery)”

MS (General Surgery)

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by

Geetanjali University, Udaipur in respect of students being trained

at Geetanjali Medical College & Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan on

or after 2019).

Note: a.

The recognition so granted shall be for a maximum period of 5 years from the date of Notification upon

which the Institute shall have to apply for renewal of recognition.

Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required shall invariably result in stoppage of admission

to the Postgraduate Course.

[No. U-12012/388/2019-ME-I/FTS No. 8022801]

P. K. BANDYOPADHYAY, Under Secy.

नागर िवमानन मंालय

नई द ली, 25 िसत बर, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 1815

1815

1815.—के3 ! सरकार, भारतीय िवमानपR तन -ािधकरण अिधिनयम, 1994 (1994 का 55) के खंड 5 म

-दR त शि=य के उपयोग से, भारतीय िवमानपR तन -ािधकरण म सद" य (िवR त) के पद से $ी एस. सुरेश का R याग पO

" वीकार करती है तथा इसके पWरणाम" वhप उ1 त पद पर उनक िनयुि= क अविध पूव, समािZ तR काल -भावी होगी।

[फा. सं. एवी-24011/22/2016-एएआई-एमओसीए]

नरे3 ! cसह, अवर सिचव

7136

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF CIVIL AVIATION

New Delhi, the 25^th September, 2019

S.O. 1815.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 5 of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994

(No. 55 of 1994), the Central Government hereby accepts the resignation of Shri S. Suresh from the post of Member

(Finance), Airports Authority of India and consequent premature termination of his appointment to the said post with

immediate effect.

[F. No. AV-24011/22/2016-AAI-MOCA]

NARENDRA SINGH, Under Secy.

कोयला मंालय

नई द ली, 8 अग"त, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 1816

1816

1816.—के3!ीय सरकार, सरकारी "थान (अ-ािधकृत अिधभोिगय क बेदखली) अिधिनयम, 1971 (1971

का 40) क धारा 3 ;ारा -द< शि=य का -योग करते &ए, िन@ सारणी के "तंभ (2) म वUणत एनएलसी तिमलनाडु पावर

िलिमटेड के अिधकाWरय को सरकार के राजपिOत अिधकाWरय के र„क के समान अिधकारी होने के कारण उ= अिधिनयम के

-योजनाथ, संपदा अिधकारी िनयु= करती है, जो उ= सारणी के "तंभ (3) क तR"थानी -िवि]य म िविनDद] सरकारी

"थान के -वग… के संबंध म अपनी अिधकाWरता क "थानीय सीमा+ के भीतर उ= अिधिनयम ;ारा अथवा उसके अधीन

-द< शि=य का -योग करगे और संपदा अिधकाWरय को अिधरोिपत कत,† का िनव,हन करगे अथा,त्-

.सं.

एनएलसी तिमलनाडु पावर िलिमटेड के अिधकारी का

पदनाम

साव जिनक प"रसर

साव जिनक प"रसर क# $ेणी और ेािधकार क# 'थानीय

क# $ेणी और ेािधकार क# 'थानीय

सीमाएं

(1)

(2)

(3)

01.

संपदा अिधकारी, एनएलसी तिमलनाडु पावर

िलिमटेड

(एनटीपीएल),

तुतीकोWरन-628004,

तिमलनाडु

एनएलसी तिमलनाडु पावर िलिमटेड (एनटीपीएल),

तुतीकोWरन-628004, तिमलनाडु से संबंिधत अथवा

अिधuिहत अथवा कराए पर िलए गए सभी सरकारी

"थान

02.

टाउनिशप -शासक, एनएलसी तिमलनाडु पावर

िलिमटेड

(एनटीपीएल),

तुतीकोWरन-628004,

तिमलनाडु

[फा. सं. पीसीए-38026/7/2018-पीसीए]

अलका शेखर, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi, the 8^th August, 2019

S.O. 1816.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised

Occupants) Act, 1971 (40 of 1971) the Central Government hereby appoints the officers of NLC Tamil Nadu Power

Limited mentioned in column (2) of the table below, being officers equivalent in rank to the Gazetted Officers of the

Government, to be estates officers for the purposes of the said Act, who shall exercise the powers, conferred and perform

the duties imposed, on estate officers by or under the said Act, within the local limits of their jurisdiction in respect of the

categories of public premises specified in the corresponding entries in column (3) of the said table, namely:-

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7137

TABLE

Serial

Number

Designation of officer of the NLC Tamil Nadu

Power Limited

Categories of the public premises and local limits of

jurisdiction

(1)

(2)

(3)

Estates Officer, NLC Tamil Nadu Power Limited

(NTPL), Tuticorin-628004, Tamil Nadu

All the public premises belonging to or acquired or

hired by NLC Tamil Nadu Power Limited (NTPL),

Tuticorin-628004, Tamil Nadu

Township Administrator, NLC Tamil Nadu

Power

Limited

(NTPL),

Tuticorin-628004,

Tamil Nadu

[F. No. PCA-38026/7/2018-PCA]

ALKA SHEKHAR, Under Secy.

नई द ली, 10 अ1 तूबर, 2019

का

का.आ. 1817

. 1817

. 1817.—के3 !ीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक FेO (अज,न और िवकास) अिधिनयम, 1957 (1957 का 20)

(िजसे इसम इसके पs चात् उ1 त अिधिनयम कहा गया है ) क धारा 4 क उप-धारा (1) के अधीन भारत सरकार के कोयला

मंOालय ;ारा जारी क गई अिधसूचना सं6 यांक का. आ. 3791(अ), तारीख 30 नवबर, 2017, जो भारत के राजपO,

असाधारण, भाग II, खw ड 3, उप-खw ड (ii), तारीख 01 दसबर, 2017 म -कािशत क गई थी, उ= अिधसूचना से उपाब‡

अनुसूची म िविनDदE ट पWरFेO क भूिम म िजसका माप 1818.10 हे1 टेयर (लगभग) या 4492.51 एकड़ (लगभग) है, कोयले

का पूवˆFण करने के अपने आशय क सूचना दी थी;

और, के3 !ीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है क इस अिधसूचना से संल‰ न अनुसूची म िविहत उ1 त भूिम के

भाग म कोयला अिभ-ाp त है;

अत:, अब, के3 !ीय सरकार उ1 त अिधिनयम क धारा 7 क उप-धारा (1) ;ारा -दR त शि1 तय का -योग करते &ए,

इससे संल‰ न अनुसूची म वŠणत 1042. 73 हे1 टेयर (लगभग) या 2575.54 एकड़ (लगभग) माप वाली भूिम म या उस पर के

सभी अिधकार का अज,न करने के अपने आशय क सूचना देती है ;

"ट) प

"ट) पण

ण

ण 1 :

1 :

इस अिधसूचना के अधीन आने वाले FेO के रेखांक सं6 यांक पीवीयूएनएल/बीएएन/एसईसी-7(1),

तारीख 25 जून, 2019 का िनरीFण उपायु=, िजला लातेहार – 829206, झारखंड के काया,लय म या कोयला िनयंOक, 1,

काउंिसल हाउस " bीट, कोलकाता - 700 001 के काया,लय म या डी.जी.एम. (सीएम-िसिवल), पतरातु िव\ुत उRपादन

िनगम िलिमटेड, पतरातु, िजला रामगढ़-829119, झारखंड या सहायक महा -बंधक (सीएम), पतरातु िव\ुत उRपादन िनगम

िलिमटेड, पतरातु, िजला रामगढ़-829119, झारखंड के काया,लय म या मु6य महा -बंधक (खोज -भाग), सbल माइन

pलाcनग एwड िडजाइन इ3"टीzयूट िलिमटेड, गडवाना pलेस, कांके रोड, रांची-834008, झारखंड म कया जा सकता है ।

"ट) प

"ट) पण

ण

ण 2 :

2 :

2 : उ1 त अिधिनयम क धारा 8 के उपबंध क ओर j यान आकृE ट कया जाता है, िजसम िन निलिखत उपबंध है :-

‘’8. अज,न के संबंध म आपि<.- (1) कोई S यि1 त जो कसी भूिम म, िजसके संबंध म धारा 7 के अधीन अिधसूचना िनकाली

गई है, िहतब‡ है, अिधसूचना के जारी कए जाने से तीस दन के भीतर स पूण, भूिम या उसके कसी भाग या ऐसी भूिम म या

उस पर के क3 हP अिधकार का अज,न कए जाने के बारे म आपिR त कर सकेगा ।

"प]ीकरण.- इस धारा के अथा,3तग,त यह आपिR त नहP मानी जाएगी, क कोई S यि1 त कसी भूिम म कोयला उR पादन के िलए

" वयं खनन संgयाएं करना चाहता है और ऐसी संgयाएं के3 !ीय सरकार या कसी अ3 य S यि1 त को नहP करनी चािहए।

7138

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(2)

उप-धारा (1) के अधीन -R येक आपिR त सFम -ािधकारी को िलिखत म क जाएगी और सFम -ािधकारी,

आपिR तकता, को " वयं सुने जाने या िविध S यवसायी ;ारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसी सभी आपिR तय को सुनने के

पs चात् और ऐसी अितWर1 त जांच, यद कोई हो, करने के पs चात् जो वह आवs यक समझता है, वह या तो धारा 7 क उप-

धारा (1) के अधीन अिधसूिचत भूिम के या ऐसी भूिम म या उस पर के अिधकार के संबंध म एक Wरपोट, या ऐसी भूिम के

िविभ3 न टुकड़ या ऐसी भूिम म या उस पर के अिधकार के संबंध म आपिR तय पर अपनी िसफाWरश और उसके ;ारा क

गई काय,वाही के अिभलेख सिहत िविभ3 न Wरपोट, के3 !ीय सरकार को उसके िविनs चय के िलए देगा ।

(3)

इस धारा के -योजन के िलए वह S यि1 त कसी भूिम म िहतब‡ समझा जाएगा जो -ितकर म िहत का दावा करने

का हकदार हो, यद भूिम या ऐसी भूिम म या उस पर के अिधकार इस अिधिनयम के अधीन अUजत कर िलए जाते ह„ ”।

"ट) प

"ट) पण 3

ण 3

ण 3: : : : के3 !ीय सरकार ने कोयला िनयंOक, 1, काउंिसल हाउस " bीट, कोलकाता - 700 001 को उ1 त अिधिनयम क

धारा 3 के अधीन अिधसूचना सं6 यांक का. आ. 2570(अ), तारीख 11 अग"त, 2017, जो भारत के राजपO, भाग II, खंड

3, उप-खंड (ii), तारीख 11 अग"त, 2017 म -कािशत क गयी थी, ;ारा सFम -ािधकारी िनयु1 त कया है ।

अनुसूची

बनहरदी कोयला -लॉक

औरंगा कोलफ#0ड

िजला

िजला - लातेहार झारख4ड

लातेहार झारख4ड

[रेखांक सं6 यांक पीवीयूएनएल/बीएएन/एसईसी-7(1), तारीख 25 जून, 2019]

सभी अिधकार:

( क ) राज"व भूिम:

g.सं.

uाम

थाना

िजला

थाना

सं6या

कुल FेOफल (लगभग )

Wटpपिणयां

हे1टेयर

एकड़

एटे

चंदवा

लातेहार

254

107.42

265.34

भाग

बनहरदी

चंदवा

लातेहार

249

154.96

382.75

भाग

बारी

चंदवा

लातेहार

251

584.01

1442.51

भाग

बरवाडीह

चंदवा

लातेहार

255

16.14

39.86

भाग

रामपुर

चंदवा

लातेहार

252

10.27

25.37

भाग

सुरली

चंदवा

लातेहार

250

23.01

56.83

भाग

टोटा

चंदवा

लातेहार

256

5.84

14.42

भाग

कुल:

901.65

2227.08

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7139

(ख) ) ) ) वन भूिम

वन भूिम

g.सं.

uाम

थाना

िजला

थाना

सं6या

कुल FेOफल (लगभग )

Wटpपिणयां

हे1टेयर

एकड़

एटे

चंदवा

लातेहार

254

1.26

3.10

भाग

बारी

चंदवा

लातेहार

251

119.06

294.09

भाग

सुरली

चंदवा

लातेहार

250

8.83

21.80

भाग

टोटा

चंदवा

लातेहार

256

11.93

29.47

भाग

कुल:

141.08

348.46

सारांश

सारांश : : : :

( क ) कुल राज"व भूिम : 901.65 हे1टेयर (लगभग ) = 2227.08 एकड़ (लगभग )

(ख ) कुल वन भूिम : 141.08 हे1टेयर (लगभग ) = 348.46

एकड़ (लगभग )

( ग ) सकल योग (क + ख ) : 1042.73 हे1टेयर (लगभग) = 2575.54 एकड़ (लगभग )

अUजत कए जाने वाले राज"व pलाट क सूची:

(1) uाम – एटे :

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29,

30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55,

56, 57, 58, 59, 60(भाग), 61(भाग), 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78,

79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102,

103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122,

123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142,

143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160(भाग),

161, 162, 163, 164(भाग), 165, 166, 167(भाग), 168(भाग), 169(भाग), 171(भाग), 176(भाग), 177(भाग),

178, 179(भाग), 180, 181, 182(भाग), 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192(भाग), 193,

194 (भाग), 201(भाग), 202(भाग), 203, 204(भाग), 205, 206(भाग), 207(भाग), 208, 209, 210, 211, 212,

213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232,

233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242(भाग), 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248(भाग), 249,

250(भाग), 251(भाग), 252, 253, 254(भाग), 255(भाग), 256(भाग), 257, 258, 259, 260, 273(भाग),

275(भाग), 276(भाग), 385(भाग), 1087, 1095, 1099, 1100, 1101, 1110, 1111, 1112.

7140

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(2) 6ाम

(2) 6ाम - बनहरदी:

बनहरदी:

348(भाग

भाग

भाग), 349(भाग

भाग

भाग), 350(भाग

भाग

भाग), 351(भाग

भाग

भाग), 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 360(भाग

भाग

भाग),

380(भाग

भाग

भाग), 381(भाग

भाग

भाग), 382(भाग

भाग

भाग), 383, 384, 385(भाग

भाग

भाग), 386(भाग

भाग

भाग), 396(भाग

भाग

भाग), 605(भाग

भाग

भाग), 606, 607, 608,

609, 610, 611, 612, 613, 614, 615, 616, 617, 618, 619, 620, 621, 622, 623, 624(भाग

भाग

भाग), 628(भाग

भाग

भाग),

629, 630(भाग

भाग

भाग), 631(भाग

भाग

भाग), 632(भाग

भाग

भाग), 669(भाग

भाग

भाग), 670, 671, 672, 673, 674, 675, 676, 677, 678, 679,

680, 681, 682, 683, 684, 685(भाग

भाग

भाग), 686, 687, 688, 689(भाग

भाग

भाग), 690, 691, 692, 693, 694, 695,

696, 697, 698, 699, 700, 701, 702, 704(भाग

भाग

भाग), 705(भाग

भाग

भाग), 708(भाग

भाग

भाग), 709(भाग

भाग

भाग), 710, 711, 712, 713,

714, 715(भाग

भाग

भाग), 716, 717, 718, 719(भाग

भाग

भाग), 724(भाग

भाग

भाग), 731(भाग

भाग

भाग), 732(भाग

भाग

भाग), 734(भाग

भाग

भाग), 735(भाग

भाग

भाग), 736,

737, 738(भाग

भाग

भाग), 739(भाग

भाग

भाग), 740, 741, 742, 743, 744, 745, 746, 747, 748, 749, 750, 751, 752, 753,

754, 755, 756, 757, 758, 759, 760, 761, 762, 763, 764, 765, 766, 767, 768, 769, 770, 771, 772,

773, 774, 775, 776, 778, 779, 780, 781, 782, 783, 784, 785, 786, 787, 788, 789, 790, 791, 792,

793, 794, 795, 796, 797, 798, 799, 800, 801(भाग

भाग

भाग), 802, 803, 804, 805, 806, 807, 808, 809, 810,

811, 812, 813, 814, 815, 816, 817, 818, 819, 820, 821, 822, 823, 824, 825, 826, 827, 828, 829,

830, 831, 832, 833, 834, 835, 836, 837, 838, 839, 840, 841, 842, 843, 844, 845, 846, 847, 848,

849, 850, 851, 852, 853, 854, 855, 856, 857, 858, 859, 860, 861, 862, 863, 864, 865, 866, 867,

868, 869, 870, 871, 872, 873, 874, 875, 876, 877, 878, 879, 880, 881, 882, 883, 884, 885, 886,

887, 888, 889, 890, 891, 892, 893, 894, 895, 896, 897, 898, 899, 900, 901, 902, 903, 904, 905,

906 , 907, 908, 909, 910, 911, 912, 913, 914, 915, 916, 917, 918, 919, 920, 921, 922, 923, 924, 925,

926, 927, 928, 929, 930, 931, 932, 933, 934, 935, 936, 937, 938, 939, 940, 941, 942, 943, 944,

945, 946, 947, 948, 949, 950, 951, 952, 953, 954, 955, 956, 957, 958, 959, 960, 961, 962, 963,

964, 965, 966, 967, 968, 969, 970, 971,972, 973, 974, 975, 976, 977, 978, 979, 980, 981, 982, 983,

984, 985, 986, 987, 988(भाग

भाग

भाग), 989(भाग

भाग

भाग), 990(भाग

भाग

भाग), 991(भाग

भाग

भाग), 992, 993, 994(भाग

भाग

भाग), 995(भाग

भाग

भाग), 996,

997, 998(भाग

भाग

भाग), 999(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1005(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011,

1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016,1017,1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027,

1028, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1032, 1033, 1034, 1035, 1036, 1037, 1038(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1129(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1130(भाग

भाग

भाग),

1131(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1132, 1133, 1134, 1135, 1136, 1137, 1138, 1139, 1140, 1141, 1142, 1143, 1144, 1145,

1146, 1147(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1148, 1149, 1150, 1151, 1152(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1153(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1154(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1156(भाग

भाग

भाग),

1157(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1158(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1161(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1191(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1192(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1193(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1194, 1195, 1196, 1197(भाग

भाग

भाग),

1198, 1199, 1200, 1201, 1202, 1203, 1204, 1205, 1206, 1207, 1208, 1209, 1210, 1211, 1212, 1213,

1214, 1215, 1216, 1217, 1218, 1219, 1220, 1221, 1222, 1223, 1224, 1225, 1226, 1227, 1228,

1229, 1230, 1231, 1232, 1233, 1234, 1235, 1236, 1237, 1238, 1239, 1240, 1241, 1242, 1243,

1244, 1245, 1246, 1247, 1248, 1249, 1250, 1251, 1252, 1253, 1254, 1255, 1256, 1257, 1258,

1259, 1260 ,1261 ,1262, 1263 ,1264, 1265, 1266, 1267, 1268, 1269, 1270, 1271, 1272, 1273,

1274, 1275, 1276, 1277, 1278, 1279, 1280, 1281, 1282, 1283, 1284, 1285, 1286, 1287, 1288,

1289, 1290, 1291, 1292, 1293, 1294, 1295, 1296, 1297, 1298, 1299, 1300, 1301, 1302, 1303,

1304, 1305, 1306, 1307, 1308, 1309, 1310, 1311, 1312, 1313, 1314, 1315, 1316, 1317, 1318,

1319, 1320, 1321, 1322, ,1324, 1325, 1326, 1327, 1328 ,1329 ,1330, 1331, 1332, 1333,

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7141

1334, 1335, 1336, 1337, 1338, 1339, 1340, 1341, 1342, 1343, 1344, 1345, 1346, 1347, 1348,

1349, 1350, 1351, 1352, 1353, 1354, 1355, 1356, 1357, 1358, 1359, 1360, 1361, 1362, 1363,

1364, 1365, 1366, 1367, 1367, 1368, 1369, 1370, 1371, 1372, 1373, 1374, 1375, 1376, 1377,

1378, 1379, 1380, 1381, 1382, 1383, 1384, 1385, 1386, 1387, 1388, 1389, 1390, 1391, 1392,

1393, 1394, 1395, 1396, 1397, 1398, 1399, 1400, 1401, 1402, 1403, 1404, 1405, 1406, 1407,

1408, 1409, 1410, 1411, 1412, 1413, 1414 ,1415, 1416 ,1417, 1418, 1419, 1420, 1421, 1422,

1423, 1424, 1425, 1426, 1427, 1428, 1429, 1430, 1431, 1432, 1433, 1434, 1435, 1436, 1437,

1438, 1439, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1443, 1444, 1445, 1456, 1447, 1448, 1449, 1450, 1451, 1452,

1453, 1454, 1455, 1456, 1457, 1458, 1459, 1460, 1461, 1462, 1463, 1464, 1465, 1466, 1467, 1468,

1469, 1470(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1471, 1472(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1473(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1542(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1543(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1555(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1556(भाग

भाग

भाग),

1557(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1558(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1563(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1566(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1567(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1568(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1569, 1570, 1571, 1572, 1573,

1574, 1575, 1576, 1577,1578, 1579, 1580, 1581, 1582,1583, 1584, 1585, 1586 ,1587, 1588, 1589,

1591, 1592, 1593(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1594(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1599(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1638(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1643(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1547(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1648(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1649,

1650, 1651, 1652, 1653, 1654, 1655, 1656, 1657, 1658, 1659, 1660(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1663(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1664, 1665,

1666, 1667, 1668), 1669, 1670(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1671, 1672(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1673, 1674, 1675, 1676, 1677(भाग

भाग

भाग),

1678(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1685(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1686, 1687(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1689, 1695(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1696(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1698(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1699, 1700, 1701,

1702, 1703, 1704, 1705, 1706, 1707, 1708, 1709, 1710, 1711, 1712, 1713, 1714, 1715, 1716,

1717, 1718, 1719, 1720, 1721, 1722, 1723, 1724, 1725, 1726, 1727, 1728, 1729, 1730, 1731,

1732, 1733, 1734, 1735, 1736, 1737, 1738, 1739, 1740, 1741, 1742, 1743, 1744, 1745, 1746,

1748, 1749, 1750, 1751, 1752, 1753, 1754, 1755, 1756, 1757, 1758, 1759, 1760, 1761, 1762,

1763, 1764, 1765, 1766, 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1772, 1773, 1774, 1775, 1776, 1777, 1778,

1779, 1780, 1781, ,1783, 1784, 1785, 1786, 1787, 1788, 1789, 1790, 1791, 1792, 1793, 1794,

1795, 1796, 1798, 1799, 1800, 1801, 1802, 1803, 1804, 1805, 1806, 1807, 1808, 1809, 1810,

1811, 1812, 1813, 1814, 1815, 1816, 1817, 1818, 1819, 1820, 1821, 1822, 1823, 1824, 1825,

1826, 1827, 1828, 1829, 1830, 1831, 1832, 1833, 1834, 1835, 1836, 1837, 1839, 1840, 1841,

1842, 1843, 1844, 1845, 1846, 1847, 1849, 1850, 1851, 1852, 1853, 1854, 1855, 1856, 1857,

1858, 1859, 1860, 1861, 1862, 1863, 1864, 1865, 1866, 1867, 1868, 1869, 1870, 1871, 1872,

1873, 1874, 1875, 1876, 1877, 1878, 1879, 1880, 1881, 1882, 1883, 1884, 1885, 1886, 1887,

1888, 1889, 1890, 1891, 1892, 1893, 1894, 1895, 1896, 1897, 1899, 1900, 1901, 1902, 1903,

1904, 1905, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1909, 1910, 1911, 1912, 1913, 1914, 1915, 1916, 1917, 1918,

1919, 1920, 1921, 1922, 1923, 1924, 1925, 1926, 1927, 1928, 1929, 1930, 1931, 1932, 1933,

1934, 1935, 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942, 1943, 1944, 1945, 1946, 1947, 1948,

1949, 1950, 1951, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1955, 1956, 1957, 1958, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963,

1964, 1965, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1974, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978,

1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993,

1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008,

2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023,

7142

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030, 2031, 2032, 2033, 2034, 2035, 2036, 2037, 2038,

2039, 2040, 2041, 2042, 2043, 2044, 2045, 2046, 2047, 2049, 2050, 2051, 2052, 2053, 2054,

2056, 2057, 2058(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2059(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2060, 2061, 2062, 2063, 2064, 2065, 2066, 2067, 2068, 2069,

2070, 2071, 2072, 2073, 2074, 2075, 2076, 2077, 2078, 2079, 2080, 2081, 2082(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2083, 2084,

2085, 2086, 2087.

(3) 6ाम

(3) 6ाम – बारी :

बारी :

8(भाग

भाग

भाग), 9(भाग

भाग

भाग), 10(भाग

भाग

भाग), 11(भाग

भाग

भाग), 12(भाग

भाग

भाग), 14(भाग

भाग

भाग), 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25,

26(भाग

भाग

भाग), 27, 28(भाग

भाग

भाग), 29(भाग

भाग

भाग), 31(भाग

भाग

भाग), 32(भाग

भाग

भाग), 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45,

46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70,71,

72, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, ,84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98 ,99,

100,101,102,103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112 ,113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119,

120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136

,137, 138, 139, 140, 141(भाग

भाग

भाग), 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156,

157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 173 (भाग

भाग

भाग), 174, 175,

176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,

196(भाग

भाग

भाग), 197(भाग

भाग

भाग), 198(भाग

भाग

भाग), 199,200, 201, 202, 203(भाग

भाग

भाग), 204(भाग

भाग

भाग), 205(भाग

भाग

भाग), 206(भाग

भाग

भाग),

208(भाग

भाग

भाग), 210 (भाग

भाग

भाग), 211(भाग

भाग

भाग), 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223,

224(भाग

भाग

भाग), 225, 226, 227 ,228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240,

242(भाग

भाग

भाग), 243(भाग

भाग

भाग), 244, 245, 246(भाग

भाग

भाग), 247(भाग

भाग

भाग), 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256,

257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275,

276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290, 291, 292, 293, 294,

295, 296, 297, 298, 299, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313,

314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332,

333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340, 341 ,342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 347, 348, 349, 350, 351,

352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 360, 361,362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370,

371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 380, 381, 382, 383, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 389,

390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408,

409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414 ,415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420,421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427,

428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446,

447, 448, 449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461, 462, 463, 464, 465,

466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477, 479(भाग

भाग

भाग), 480(भाग

भाग

भाग), 481, 482, 483,

484, 485, 486, 487, 488, 489, 490, 491, 492, 493, 497, 498, 499, 500, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505,

506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 517, 518, 519, 520, 521, 522, 523, 524,

525, 526, 527, 528, 529, 530, 531, 532, 533, 534, 535, 536, 537, 538, 539, 540, 541, 542, 543,

544, 545, 546, 547, 548, 549, 550, 551, 552, 553, 554, 555, 556, 557, 558, 559, 560, 561, 562,

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7143

563, 564, 565, 566, 567, 568 ,569, 570, 571, 572, 573, 574, 575, 576, 577, 578, 579, 580, 581,

582, 583, 584, 585, 586, 587, 588, 589, 590, 591, 592, 593, 594, 595, 596, 597, 598, 599, 600,

601 ,602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 612, 613, 614, 615, 616, 617, 618, 619,

620, 621, 622, 623, 624, 625, 626, 627, 628, 629, 630, 631, 632, 633, 634, 635, 636, 637, 638,

639, 640, 641, 642, 643, 644, 645, 646, 647, 648, 649, 650, 651, 652, 653, 654, 655, 656, 657,

658, 659, 660 ,661, 662, 663, 664, 665, 667, 668, 669, 670, 671, 672, 673, 674, 675, 676, 677,

678, 679, 680 ,681, 682, 683, 684, 685, 686, 687, 688, 689, 690, 691, 692, 693, 694, 695, 696,

697, 698, 699, 700, 701, 702, 703, ,705, 706, 707, 708, 709, 710, 711, 712, 713, 714, 715,

716,717, 718, 719, 720, 721, 722, 723, 724, 725, 726, 727, 728, 729, 730, 731, 732, ,734, 735,

736, 737, 738, 739, 740, 741, 742, 743, 744, 745, 746, 747, 748, 749, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754,

755, 756, 757, 758, 759, 760, 761, 762, 763, 764, 765, 766, 767, 768, 769, 770, 771, 772, 773,

774, 775, 776, 778, 779, 780, 781, 782, 783, 784, 785, 786, 787, 788, 789, 790, 791, 792, 793,

794, 795, 796, 797, 798, 799, 800, 801, 802, 803, 804, 805, 806, 807, 808, 809, 810, 811, 812,

813, 814, 815, 816, 817, 818, 819, 820, 821, 822, 823, 824, 825, 826, 827, 828, 829, 830, 831,

832, 833, 834, 834, 835, 836, 837, 838, 839, 840, 841, 842, 843, 844, 845, 846, 847, 848, 849, 850,

851, 852, 853, 854, 855, 856, 857, 858, 859, 860, 861, 862, 863, 864, 865, 866, 867, 868, 869,

870, 871, 872, 873, 874, 875, 876, 877, 878, 879, 880, 881, 882, 883, 884, 885, 886, 887, 888,

889, 890, 891, 892, 893, 894, 895, 896, 897, 898, 899, 900, 901, 902, 903, 904, 905, 906, 907,

908, 909, 910, 911, 912, 913, 914, 915, 916, 917, 918, 919, 920, 921, 922, 923, 924, 925, 926,

927, 928, 929, 930, 931, 932, 933, 934, 935, 936, 937, 938, 939 ,940, 941, 942, 943, 944, 945,

946, 947, 948, 949, 950, 951, 952, 953, 954, 955, 956, 957, 958, 959, 960, 961, 962, 963, 964,

965, 966, 967, 968, 969, 970, 971, 972, 973, 974, 975, 976, 977, 978, 979, 980, 981, 982, 983,

984, 985, 986, 987, 988, 989, 990, 991, 992, 993, 994, 995, 996, 997, 998, 999, 1000, 1001,

1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015,

1016(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029,

1030, 1031, 1032, 1033, 1034, 1035, 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1042, 1043, 1044,

1045, 1046, 1047, 1048, 1049, 1050, 1051, 1052, 1053, 1054, 1055, 1056, 1057, 1058, 1059,

1060, 1061, 1062, 1063, 1064, 1065, 1066(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1067(भाग

भाग

भाग, 1070(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1090(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1091(भाग

भाग

भाग),

1092(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1093(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1094, 1095, 1096, 1097, 1098, 1099, 1100(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1101, 1102(भाग

भाग

भाग),

1103(भाग

भाग

भाग) ,1104(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1105, 1106, 1107, 1108, 1109, 1110, 1111, 1112, 1113, 1114, 1115, 1116,

1117, 1118, 1119, 1120, 1121, 1122, 1123, 1124, 1125, 1126, 1127, 1128, 1129, 1130, 1131,

1132, 1133, 1134, 1135, 1136, 1137, 1138, 1139, 1140, 1141, 1142, 1143, 1144, 1145, 1146,

1147, 1148, 1149, 1150, 1151, 1152, 1153, 1154, 1155, 1156, 1157, 1158, 1159, 1160, 1161,

1162 ,1163, 1164, 1165, 1166, 1167, 1168, 1169, 1170, 1171, 1172, 1173, 1174, 1175, 1176,

1177, 1178, 1179, 1180, 1181, 1182, 1183, 1184, 1185, 1186, 1187, 1188, 1189, 1190, 1191,

1192, 1193, 1194, 1195, 1196, 1197, 1198, 1199, 1200, 1201, 1202, 1203, 1204, 1205, 1206,

1207, 1208, 1209, 1210, 1211, 1212, 1213, 1214, 1215, 1216, 1217, 1218, 1219, 1220, 1221,

7144

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1222, 1223, 1224, 1225, 1226, 1227, 1228, 1229, 1230, 1231, 1232, 1233, 1234, 1235, 1236,

1237, 1238, 1239, 1240, 1241, 1242, 1243, 1244, ,1246, 1247 ,1248, 1249, 1250, 1251, 1252,

1253, 1254, 1255, 1256, 1257, 1258, 1259, 1260, 1261, 1262, 1263, 1264, 1265, 1266, 1267,

1268, 1269, 1270, 1271, 1272, 1273, 1274, 1275, 1276, 1276, 1277, 1278, 1279, 1280, 1281,

1282, 1283, 1284, 1285, 1286, 1287, 1288, 1289, 1290, 1291, 1292, 1293, 1294, 1295, 1296,

1297, 1298, 1299, 1300, 1301, 1302, 1303, 1304, 1305, 1306, 1307, 1308, 1309, 1310, 1311,

1312, 1314, 1315, 1316, 1317, 1318, 1319, 1320, 1321, 1322, 1323, 1324, 1325, 1326, 1327,

1328, 1329, 1330, 1331, 1332, 1333 ,1334 ,1335, 1336, 1337, 1338, 1339, 1340, 1341, 1342,

1343, 1344, 1345, 1346, 1347, 1348, 1349, 1350, 1351, 1352, 1353, 1354, 1355, 1356 ,1357,

1358, 1359, 1360, 1361, 1362, 1363, 1364, 1365, 1366, 1367, 1368, 1369, 1370, 1371, 1372,

1373, 1374, ,1376, 1377, 1378, 1379, 1380, 1381, 1382, 1383, 1384, 1385, 1386, 1387, 1388,

1389, 1390, 1391, 1392, 1393, 1394, 1395, 1396, 1397, 1398, 1399, 1400, 1401, 1402, 1403,

1404, 1405, 1406, 1407, 1408, 1409, 1410, 1411, 1412, 1413, 1414, 1415, 1416, 1417, 1418,

1419, 1420, 1421, 1422, 1423, 1424, 1425, 1426, ,1428, 1429, 1430, 1431, 1432, 1433, 1434,

1435, 1436, 1437, 1438, 1439, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1443, 1444, 1445, 1446, 1447, 1448, 1449,

1450, 1451, 1452, 1453, 1454, 1455, 1456, 1457, 1458, 1459, 1460, 1461, 1462, 1463, 1464,

1465, 1466, 1467, 1468, 1469, 1470, 1471, 1472, 1473, 1474, 1475, 1476, 1477, 1478, 1479,

1480, 1481(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1482, 1483, 1484, 1485, 1486, 1487, 1488, 1489, 1490, 1491, 1492(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1493,

1494(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1511(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1512(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1513(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1514(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1515, 1516, 1517, 1518, 1519(भाग

भाग

भाग),

1520, 1521, 1522, 1523, 1524, 1525, 1526, 1527, 1528, 1529, 1530, 1531, 1532, 1533, 1534,

1535, 1536, 1537, 1538, 1539, 1540, 1541, 1542, 1543, 1544, 1545, 1546, 1547, 1548, 1549,

1550, 1551, 1552, 1553, 1554 ,1555 ,1556 1557, 1558, 1559, 1560 ,1561, 1562, 1563, 1564,

1565, ,1567, 1568, 1569, 1570, 1571, 1572, 1573, 1574, 1575, 1576, 1577, 1578, 1579, 1580,

1581, 1582, 1583, 1584, 1585, 1586, 1587, 1588, 1589, 1590, 1591, 1592, 1593, 1594, 1595,

1596, 1597, 1598, 1599, 1600, 1601, 1602, 1603, 1604, 1605, 1606, 1607, 1608, 1609, 1610,

1611, 1612, 1613 ,1614, 1615, 1616, 1617, 1618, 1619, 1620, 1621, 1622, 1623, 1624, 1625,

1626, 1627, 1628, 1629, 1630, 1631,1632, 1633, 1634, 1635, 1636, 1637, 1638, 1639, 1640,

1641, 1642, 1643, 1644, 1645, 1646, 1647, 1648, 1649, 1650, 1651, 1652, 1653, 1654,

1655,,1657, 1658, 1659, 1660, 1661, 1662, 1663, 1664, 1665, 1666, 1667, 1668, 1669, 1670,

1671, 1672, 1673, 1674, 1675, 1676, 1677, 1678, 1679, 1680, 1681, 1682, 1683, 1684, 1685,

1686, 1687, 1688, 1689, 1690, 1691, 1692, 1693, 1694, 1695, 1696, 1697, 1698, 1699, 1700,

1701, 1702, 1703, 1704, 1705, 1706, 1708, 1709, 1710, 1711, 1712, 1713, 1714, 1715, 1716,

1717, 1718, 1719, 1720, 1721, 1722, 1723, 1724, 1725, 1726, 1727, 1728, 1729, 1730, 1731,

1732, 1733, 1734, 1735, 1736, 1737, 1738, 1739, 1740, 1741, 1742, 1743, 1744, 1745, 1746,

1747, 1748, 1749, 1750, 1751, 1752, 1753, 1754, 1755, 1756, 1757, 1758, 1759, 1760, 1761,

1762, 1763, 1764, 1765, 1766, 1767, 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1772, 1773, 1774, 1775, 1776,

1777, 1778, 1779, 1780, 1781, 1782, 1783, 1784, 1785, 1786, 1786, 1787(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1788(भाग

भाग

भाग),

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7145

1789(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1790(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1794(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1826(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1827, 1828, 1829(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1830, 1831, 1832, 1833,

1834, 1835, 1836, 1837, 1838, 1839, 1840, 1841, 1842, 1843, 1844, 1845(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1846(भाग

भाग

भाग),

1848(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1850(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1852, 1853, 1854, 1855, 1856, 1857, 1858, 1859, 1860, 1861, 1862, 1863,

1864, 1865, 1866, 1867, 1868, 1869, 1870, 1871, 1872, 1873, 1874, 1875, 1876, 1877, 1878,

1879, 1880, 1881, 1882, 1883, 1884, 1885, 1886, 1887, 1888, 1889, 1890, 1891, 1892, 1893,

1894, 1895, 1896, 1897, 1898, 1899, 1900, 1901, 1902, 1903, 1904, 1905, 1906, 1907, 1908,

1909, 1910(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1911, 1912, 1913, 1914, 1915, 1916(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1917(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1930(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1937(भाग

भाग

भाग),

1938, 1939, 1940, 1941(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1942(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1947(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1950(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1952, 1953, 1954, 1955, 1956,

1957, 1958, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1964(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1971(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1987(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1988(भाग

भाग

भाग), 1989(भाग

भाग

भाग),

1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004,

2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2011(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2012(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2013(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2014, 2015, 2016,

2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030, 2031,

2032, 2033, 2034, 2035, 2038, 2039, 2040, 2041, 2042, 2043, 2044, 2045, 2046, 2047, 2048,

2049, 2050, 2051, 2052, 2053, 2054, 2055(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2057, 2058(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2057(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2059, 2060(भाग

भाग

भाग),

2061(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2066(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2067, 2068(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2069(भा

भा

भाग), 2070(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2071, 2072, 2073(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2074(भाग

भाग

भाग),

2075(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2078, 2079(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2080(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2101(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2155(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2156(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2157(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2158(भाग

भाग

भाग),

2159(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2160(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2161(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2162, 2163, 2164, 2165, 2166, 2167, 2168, 2169, 2170, 2171,

2172, 2173, 2174, 2177(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2174(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2797(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2800, 2805, 2809(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2811, 2813, 2815,

2816, 2817, 2818, 2819, 2820, 2821, 2822, 2823, 2824, 2825, 2826, 2827, 2829, 2830, 2831(भाग

भाग

भाग),

2833, 2835, 2836, 2803, 2160(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2799(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2798, 2037, 1851, 1930(भाग

भाग

भाग), 2036, 2831(भा

भा

भाग).

(4) 6ाम

(4) 6ाम – बरवाडीह:

बरवाडीह:

1(भाग ), 2, 3(भाग), 4(भाग), 5(भाग), 6(भाग), 7, 8(भाग), 9, 10, 11, 12, 13(भाग), 14(भाग), 15(भाग),

35(भाग), 39(भाग), 145(भाग), 146, 147(भाग), 148, 149(भाग), 180(भाग), 181(भाग), 182(भाग), 183,

184(भाग), 185, 186, 187, 188(भाग) , 509(भाग).

(5)

(5) 6ाम

6ाम

6ाम - टोटा :

टोटा :

1, 3, 4, 5, 6(भाग), 7(भाग), 9 (भाग), 10(भाग), 11(भाग), 12(भाग), 69(भाग).

(6) uाम - रामपुर :

918(भाग), 919(भाग), 920, 921(भाग), 925(भाग), 928(भाग), 932(भाग), 933(भाग), 934, 935, 936, 937,

938, 939, 940, 941, 942, 943, 944(भाग), 945, 946, 947, 948, 949, 950, 951, 952, 953, 954, 955(भाग),

956, 957, 958(भाग), 960(भाग), 964(भाग), 965(भाग), 970(भाग), 971, 972(भाग), 973(भाग), 977(भाग),

978(भाग), 998(भाग), 999, 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003(भाग), 1006(भाग), 1007, 1008, 1009(भाग),

1011(भाग), 1042(भाग).

7146

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(7) 6ाम

(7) 6ाम – सुरली :

सुरली :

1, 2, 3, 6, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 13, 16(भाग), 19, 20, 24, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31(भाग), 34(भाग), 115(भाग),

116(भाग), 117(भाग), 118, 119, 120(भाग), 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 128(भाग), 129, 130, 131, 132(भाग),

135, 136, 140, 141, 142(भाग), 143, 144, 145(भाग), 165(भाग), 166(भाग), 168, 169, 170, 171, 172(भाग),

173(भाग), 174(भाग), 176(भाग), 177, 178(भाग), 179(भाग), 203(भाग), 444(भाग), 447(भाग), 621(भाग).

वन कडे"टरल सवˆFण म अUजत कए जाने वाले pलॉट सं6यांक क सूची :

uाम एटे : 24 .

uाम बारी : 1303, 62, 9, 6(भाग), 5(भाग), 4(भाग), 1281, 1283, 35, 187, 91 , 116, 93,

114, 1310(भाग), 771(भाग) .

uाम सुरली : 296(भाग), 1(भाग), 305 .

uाम टोटा : 2 (भाग), 144(भाग).

सीमा

सीमा - वण न :

वण न :

रेखा क – क1- ख – ख1 – ख2 – ख 3 – ख 4 – ख 5 – ख 6 – ख 7 – ग : रेखा uाम बनहरदी (थाना चंदवा) म pलाट

सं6या 732 म cबदु ‘क’ से आरभ होते &ए उ<र पूव, दशा म pलाट सं6या 732 म cबदु ‘क1’ तक ह„ । इसके प^ात यह रेखा

पूव, दशा म बढ़ती &ए cबदु ‘क1’ से cबदु ‘ख’ तक बनहरदी के pलाट सं6या 719, 685, 1563, 1648, 1687 से गुजरते &ए

प&ँचती है । इसके प^ात यह रेखा दिFण पूव, दशा म cबदु ‘ख’ से बढ़ती &ए uाम सुरली के वन भूिम pलाट सं6या 16, 31

से गुजरती &ए uाम सुरली म cबदु ख1 म pलाट सं6या 120 तक ह„ । इसके प^ात यह रेखा cबदु ख1 से दिFण पूव, दशा म

uाम सुरली के pलाट सं6या 120 और 128 से होते &ए cबदु ख2 uाम सुरली के pलाट सं6या 128 तक प&ँचती है । इसके

प^ात यह रेखा cबदु ख2 से uाम सुरली pलाट सं6या 115, 166, 172, 447 और uाम बारी pलाट सं6या 1016, 1066 से

गुजरती &ए दिFण पूव, दशा म uाम बारी के pलाट सं6या 1066 म cबदु ख3 तक प&ँचती है । इसके प^ात यह रेखा cबदु

ख3 से दिFण पूव, दशा बढ़ते &ए uाम बारी के pलाट सं6या 1093, 1100, 1103, 1104 से गुजरती &ए uाम बारी के pलाट

सं6या 1788, म cबदु ख4 तक प&ँचती है । इसके प^ात यह रेखा cबदु ख 4 से दिFण पूव, दशा म बढ़ते &ए uाम बारी के

pलाट सं6या 1789, 1787, 1826, 1845 से गुजरती &ए uाम बारी के pलाट सं6या 1848 म cबदु ख5 तक प&ँचती है ।

इसके प^ात यह रेखा cबदु ख5 से uाम बारी pलाट सं6या 1916, 1910, 1950, 1962 से गुजरते &ए दिFण पूव, दशा म

uाम बारी के pलाट सं6या 1964 , म cबदु ख6 तक प&ँचती है । इसके प^ात यह रेखा cबदु ख6 से uाम बारी के pलाट सं6या

1987, 1988 और uाम रामपुर के pलाट सं6या 918, 919, 928 से गुजरती &ए दिFण पूव, दशा म uाम रामपुर pलाट

सं6या 944 म cबदु ख7 तक प&ँचती है । इसके प^ात यह रेखा दिFण पूव, दशा म बढ़ती &ए uाम रामपुर के pलाट सं6या

972, 955, 1009 से गुजरती &ए uाम रामपुर के pलाट सं6या 1011 म cबदु ‘ख’ तक प&ँचती है ।

रेखा ग–ग1–ग2–ग3-ग4–ग5-घ : रेखा uाम रामपुर pलाट सं6या 1011 म cबदु ‘ग’ से दिFण दशा म बढ़ते &ए uाम बारी के

pलाट सं6या 2010 म cबदु ग1 तक प&ँचती है। इसके प^ात यह रेखा cबदु ग1 दिFण पि^म दशा म बढ़ते &ए uाम बारी

pलाट सं6या 2012, 2075, 2074 से गुजरते &ए uाम बारी के pलाट सं6या 2080 म cबदु ग2 तक प&ँचती है। इसके प^ात

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7147

यह रेखा cबदु ग2 से दिFण पि^म दशा म बढ़ते &ए uाम बारी के pलाट सं6या 2080, 2073 से गुजरती &ए uाम बारी के

pलाट सं6या 2073 cबदु ग3 तक प&ँचती है । इसके प^ात यह रेखा दिFण पि^म दशा म बढ़ती &ए uाम बारी के pलाट

सं6या 2060, 2058, 2156, 2159, 2174, 1514, 1492 और uाम एटे के pलाट सं6या 385, 273, 275, 206, 201 से

गुजरती &ए uाम एटे के pलाट सं6या 192 , म cबदु ग4 तक प&ँचती है । इसके प^ात यह रेखा cबदु ग4 से दिFण पि^म

दशा म बढ़ती &ए uाम एटे के pलाट सं6या 194, 179, 164, 1106 और uाम बरवाडीह के pलाट सं6या 509, 149, 145,

39 से गुजरती &ए uाम बरवाडीह के pलाट सं6या 14 म cबदु ग5 तक प&ँचती है । इसके प^ात यह रेखा cबदु ग5 पि^म

दशा म बढ़ती &ए uाम बरवाडीह के pलाट सं6या 15, 6, 3 और uाम टोटा के pलाट सं6या 12, 11, 7 , से गुजरती &ए uाम

टोटा के वन भूिम pलाट सं6या 6 , म cबदु ‘घ’ तक प&ँचती है ।

रेखा :- घ – घ1 – घ2 –घ3 – घ4 – घ5 –घ6 – घ7 – घ8 – घ9 –घ10 – घ11 – घ12 – घ13 – घ14 – ड. : रेखा uाम

टोटा के वन भूिम pलाट सं6या 6 म cबदु ‘घ’ से उतर पि^म दशा म बढ़ती &ए इसी pलाट म cबदु ‘घ1’ तक प&ँचती है ।

इसके प^ात यह रेखा म नाला के कनारे होते &ए uाम टोटा म pलाट सं6या 69 म cबदु घ 2 और, घ 3 और uाम बारी pलाट

सं6या 204 म cबदु घ4, घ5, घ6 , घ7, घ8, घ9, घ10, घ11, घ12 और घ13 से, और uाम बारी वन भूिम pलाट सं6या 8

म cबदु घ14 होते &ए uाम बारी के वन भूिम pलाट सं6या 8 म cबदु ‘ड.’ तक प&ँचती है ।

रेखा : ड. – क : रेखा uाम बारी के वन भूिम pलाट सं6या 8 म cबदु ‘ड.’ से उतर दशा म बढ़ते &ए uाम बारी के pलाट

सं6या 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 म जंगल से होते &ए uाम बारी के pलाट सं6या 11 , 26, 29, 31, और uाम बनहरदी pलाट सं6या

1193, 1131, 1005, 991, 350, 386, 735 से गुजरते &ए uाम बनहरदी के pलाट सं6या 732 म cबदु ‘क’ पर समाZ

होती है ।

[फा. सं. 43015/40/2017-एलए एwड आईआर]

राम िशरोमिण सरोज, उप सिचव

New Delhi, the 10^th October, 2019

S.O. 1817.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O.

3791(E), dated the 30^th November,2017, issued under sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas

(Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and published in the

Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), dated the 1^st December,2017, the Central

Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for coal in 1818.10 hectares (approximately) or 4492.51 acres

(approximately) of the land in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification;

And, whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable in a part of the said lands prescribed in

the schedule appended to this notification.

Now, therefore, in exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 7 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire the land measuring 1042.73 hectares (approximately) or

2575.54 acres (approximately) and all rights in or over the said lands as described in the Schedule appended hereto;

Note 1: The plan bearing number PVUNL/BAN/SEC-7(1), dated the 25^th June,2019, the area covered by this

notification may be inspected in the office of the Deputy Commissioner, District Latehar-829206, Jharkhand or at the

office of the Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata -700 001 or at the office of the DGM( CM-Civil), Patratu

Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited, Patratu, District Ramgarh-829119, Jharkhand or at the office of the Assistant General

Manager (CM), Patratu Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited, Patratu, District Ramgarh-829119, Jharkhand or Chief General

Manager (Exploration Division), Central Mine Planning and Design Institute Limited, Gondwana Palace, Kanke Road,

Ranchi-834008,Jharkhand.

7148

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Note 2: Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of section 8 of the said Act which provides as follows:-

“8. Objection to acquisition.- (1) Any person interested in any land in respect of which a notification under section 7 has

been issued may, within thirty days of the issue of the notification, object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of

the land or any rights in or over such land.

Explanation.- It shall not be an objection within the meaning of this section for any person to say that he himself desires

to undertake mining operation in the land for the production of coal and that such operation should not be undertaken by

the Central Government or by any other person.

(2)

Every objection under sub-section (1) shall be made to the competent authority in writing, and the competent

authority shall give the objector an opportunity of being heard either in person or by a legal practitioner and shall, after

hearing all such objections and after making such further inquiry, if any, as he thinks necessary, either makes a report in

respect of the land which has been notified under sub-section (1) of section 7 or of rights in or over such land, or make

different reports in respect of different parcels of such land or of rights in or over such land, to the Central Government,

containing his recommendations on the objections, together with the record of the proceedings held by him, for the

decision of the Government.

(3)

For the purposes of this section, a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitled to claim

an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under this Act”.

Note 3: The Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata-700 001 has been appointed by the Central Government

as the competent authority under section 3 of the said Act, vide notification number S.O. 2570(E), dated the

11^th August,2017, published in Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) of the Gazette of India, dated the 11^th August, 2017.

SCHEDULE

Banhardih Coal Block

Auranga Coalfield

District - Latehar, Jharkhand

[Plan bearing number PVUNL/ BAN/ SEC- 7(1), dated the 25^th June, 2019]

ALL RIGHTS :

(A) REVENUE LAND :

Sl.No.

Village

Thana

District

Thana

number

Total area (approximately)

Remarks

hectare

acre

Ate

Chandwa

Latehar

254

107.42

265.34

Part

Banhardi

Chandwa

Latehar

249

154.96

382.75

Part

Bari

Chandwa

Latehar

251

584.01

1442.51

Part

Barwadih

Chandwa

Latehar

255

16.14

39.86

Part

Rampur

Chandwa

Latehar

252

10.27

25.37

Part

Surli

Chandwa

Latehar

250

23.01

56.83

Part

Tota

Chandwa

Latehar

256

5.84

14.42

Part

Total :

901.65

2227.08

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7149

(B) FOREST LAND :

Sl.No.

Village

Thana

District

Thana

number

Total area (approximately)

Remarks

hectare

acre

Ate

Chandwa

Latehar

254

1.26

3.10

Part

Bari

Chandwa

Latehar

251

119.06

294.09

Part

Surli

Chandwa

Latehar

250

8.83

21.80

Part

Tota

Chandwa

Latehar

256

11.93

29.47

Part

Total :

141.08

348.46

SUMMARY:

(A) Total Revenue Land :

901.65 hectares (approximately) =2227.08 acres (approximately)

(B) Total Forest Land :

141.08 hectares (Approximately) =348.46 acres (approximately)

1042.73 hectares (approximately) =2575.54 acres (approximately)

LIST OF REVENUE PLOT NUMBERS TO BE ACQUIRED :

(1) Village - ATE :

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34,

35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60(Part), 61(Part), 62,

63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93,

94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118,

119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143,

144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160(Part), 161, 162, 163, 164(Part),

165, 166, 167(Part), 168(Part), 169(Part), 171(Part), 176(Part), 177(Part), 178, 179(Part), 180, 181, 182(Part), 183,

184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192(Part), 193, 194 (Part), 201(Part), 202(Part), 203, 204(Part), 205, 206(Part),

207(Part), 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229,

230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242(Part), 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248(Part), 249, 250(Part),

251(Part), 252, 253, 254(Part), 255(Part), 256(Part), 257, 258, 259, 260, 273(Part), 275(Part), 276(Part), 385(Part), 1087,

1095, 1099, 1100, 1101, 1110, 1111, 1112.

(2) Village –Banhardi :

348(Part), 349(Part), 350(Part), 351(Part), 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 360(Part), 380(Part), 381(Part),

382(Part), 383, 384, 385(Part), 386(Part), 396(Part), 605(Part), 606, 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 612, 613, 614, 615, 616,

617, 618, 619, 620, 621, 622, 623, 624(Part), 628(Part), 629, 630(Part), 631(Part), 632(Part), 669(Part), 670, 671, 672,

673, 674, 675, 676, 677, 678, 679, 680, 681, 682, 683, 684, 685(Part), 686, 687, 688, 689(Part), 690, 691, 692, 693,

694, 695, 696, 697, 698, 699, 700, 701, 702, 704(Part), 705(Part), 708(Part), 709(Part), 710, 711, 712, 713, 714,

715(Part), 716, 717, 718, 719(Part), 724(Part), 731(Part), 732(Part), 734(Part), 735(Part), 736, 737, 738(Part), 739(Part),

740, 741, 742, 743, 744, 745, 746, 747, 748, 749, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755, 756, 757, 758, 759, 760, 761, 762,

763, 764, 765, 766, 767, 768, 769, 770, 771, 772, 773, 774, 775, 776, 778, 779, 780, 781, 782, 783, 784, 785, 786, 787,

788, 789, 790, 791, 792, 793, 794, 795, 796, 797, 798, 799, 800, 801(Part), 802, 803, 804, 805, 806, 807, 808, 809,

810, 811, 812, 813, 814, 815, 816, 817, 818, 819, 820, 821, 822, 823, 824, 825, 826, 827, 828, 829, 830, 831, 832, 833,

834, 835, 836, 837, 838, 839, 840, 841, 842, 843, 844, 845, 846, 847, 848, 849, 850, 851, 852, 853, 854, 855, 856, 857,

858, 859, 860, 861, 862, 863, 864, 865, 866, 867, 868, 869, 870, 871, 872, 873, 874, 875, 876, 877, 878, 879, 880, 881,

882, 883, 884, 885, 886, 887, 888, 889, 890, 891, 892, 893, 894, 895, 896, 897, 898, 899, 900, 901, 902, 903, 904, 905,

7150

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

906 , 907, 908, 909, 910, 911, 912, 913, 914, 915, 916, 917, 918, 919, 920, 921, 922, 923, 924, 925, 926, 927, 928, 929,

930, 931, 932, 933, 934, 935, 936, 937, 938, 939, 940, 941, 942, 943, 944, 945, 946, 947, 948, 949, 950, 951, 952, 953,

954, 955, 956, 957, 958, 959, 960, 961, 962, 963, 964, 965, 966, 967, 968, 969, 970, 971,972, 973, 974, 975, 976, 977,

978, 979, 980, 981, 982, 983, 984, 985, 986, 987, 988(Part), 989(Part), 990(Part), 991(Part), 992, 993, 994(Part),

995(Part), 996, 997, 998(Part), 999(Part), 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003(Part), 1005(Part), 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012,

1013, 1014, 1015, 1016,1017,1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1031,

1032, 1033, 1034, 1035, 1036, 1037, 1038(Part), 1129(Part), 1130(Part), 1131(Part), 1132, 1133, 1134, 1135, 1136,

1137, 1138, 1139, 1140, 1141, 1142, 1143, 1144, 1145, 1146, 1147(Part), 1148, 1149, 1150, 1151, 1152(Part),

1153(Part), 1154(Part), 1156(Part), 1157(Part), 1158(Part), 1161(Part), 1191(Part), 1192(Part), 1193(Part), 1194, 1195,

1196, 1197(Part), 1198, 1199, 1200, 1201, 1202, 1203, 1204, 1205, 1206, 1207, 1208, 1209, 1210, 1211, 1212, 1213,

1214, 1215, 1216, 1217, 1218, 1219, 1220, 1221, 1222, 1223, 1224, 1225, 1226, 1227, 1228, 1229, 1230, 1231, 1232,

1233, 1234, 1235, 1236, 1237, 1238, 1239, 1240, 1241, 1242, 1243, 1244, 1245, 1246, 1247, 1248, 1249, 1250, 1251,

1252, 1253, 1254, 1255, 1256, 1257, 1258, 1259, 1260 ,1261 ,1262, 1263 ,1264, 1265, 1266, 1267, 1268, 1269, 1270,

1271, 1272, 1273, 1274, 1275, 1276, 1277, 1278, 1279, 1280, 1281, 1282, 1283, 1284, 1285, 1286, 1287, 1288, 1289,

1290, 1291, 1292, 1293, 1294, 1295, 1296, 1297, 1298, 1299, 1300, 1301, 1302, 1303, 1304, 1305, 1306, 1307, 1308,

1309, 1310, 1311, 1312, 1313, 1314, 1315, 1316, 1317, 1318, 1319, 1320, 1321, 1322, ,1324, 1325, 1326, 1327,

1328 ,1329 ,1330, 1331, 1332, 1333, 1334, 1335, 1336, 1337, 1338, 1339, 1340, 1341, 1342, 1343, 1344, 1345, 1346,

1347, 1348, 1349, 1350, 1351, 1352, 1353, 1354, 1355, 1356, 1357, 1358, 1359, 1360, 1361, 1362, 1363, 1364, 1365,

1366, 1367, 1367, 1368, 1369, 1370, 1371, 1372, 1373, 1374, 1375, 1376, 1377, 1378, 1379, 1380, 1381, 1382, 1383,

1384, 1385, 1386, 1387, 1388, 1389, 1390, 1391, 1392, 1393, 1394, 1395, 1396, 1397, 1398, 1399, 1400, 1401, 1402,

1403, 1404, 1405, 1406, 1407, 1408, 1409, 1410, 1411, 1412, 1413, 1414 ,1415, 1416 ,1417, 1418, 1419, 1420, 1421,

1422, 1423, 1424, 1425, 1426, 1427, 1428, 1429, 1430, 1431, 1432, 1433, 1434, 1435, 1436, 1437, 1438, 1439, 1440,

1441, 1442, 1443, 1444, 1445, 1456, 1447, 1448, 1449, 1450, 1451, 1452, 1453, 1454, 1455, 1456, 1457, 1458, 1459,

1460, 1461, 1462, 1463, 1464, 1465, 1466, 1467, 1468, 1469, 1470(Part), 1471, 1472(Part), 1473(Part), 1542(Part),

1543(Part), 1555(Part), 1556(Part), 1557(Part), 1558(Part), 1563(Part), 1566(Part), 1567(Part), 1568(Part), 1569, 1570,

1571, 1572, 1573, 1574, 1575, 1576, 1577,1578, 1579, 1580, 1581, 1582,1583, 1584, 1585, 1586 ,1587, 1588, 1589, 1591,

1592, 1593(Part), 1594(Part), 1599(Part), 1638(Part), 1643(Part), 1547(Part), 1648(Part), 1649, 1650, 1651, 1652, 1653,

1654, 1655, 1656, 1657, 1658, 1659, 1660(Part), 1663(Part), 1664, 1665, 1666, 1667, 1668), 1669, 1670(Part), 1671,

1672(Part), 1673, 1674, 1675, 1676, 1677(Part), 1678(Part), 1685(Part), 1686, 1687(Part), 1689, 1695(Part), 1696(Part),

1698(Part), 1699, 1700, 1701, 1702, 1703, 1704, 1705, 1706, 1707, 1708, 1709, 1710, 1711, 1712, 1713, 1714, 1715,

1716, 1717, 1718, 1719, 1720, 1721, 1722, 1723, 1724, 1725, 1726, 1727, 1728, 1729, 1730, 1731, 1732, 1733,

1734, 1735, 1736, 1737, 1738, 1739, 1740, 1741, 1742, 1743, 1744, 1745, 1746, 1748, 1749, 1750, 1751, 1752, 1753,

1754, 1755, 1756, 1757, 1758, 1759, 1760, 1761, 1762, 1763, 1764, 1765, 1766, 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1772, 1773,

1774, 1775, 1776, 1777, 1778, 1779, 1780, 1781, ,1783, 1784, 1785, 1786, 1787, 1788, 1789, 1790, 1791, 1792, 1793,

1794, 1795, 1796, 1798, 1799, 1800, 1801, 1802, 1803, 1804, 1805, 1806, 1807, 1808, 1809, 1810, 1811, 1812, 1813,

1814, 1815, 1816, 1817, 1818, 1819, 1820, 1821, 1822, 1823, 1824, 1825, 1826, 1827, 1828, 1829, 1830, 1831, 1832,

1833, 1834, 1835, 1836, 1837, 1839, 1840, 1841, 1842, 1843, 1844, 1845, 1846, 1847, 1849, 1850, 1851, 1852, 1853,

1854, 1855, 1856, 1857, 1858, 1859, 1860, 1861, 1862, 1863, 1864, 1865, 1866, 1867, 1868, 1869, 1870, 1871, 1872,

1873, 1874, 1875, 1876, 1877, 1878, 1879, 1880, 1881, 1882, 1883, 1884, 1885, 1886, 1887, 1888, 1889, 1890, 1891,

1892, 1893, 1894, 1895, 1896, 1897, 1899, 1900, 1901, 1902, 1903, 1904, 1905, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1909, 1910, 1911,

1912, 1913, 1914, 1915, 1916, 1917, 1918, 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922, 1923, 1924, 1925, 1926, 1927, 1928, 1929, 1930,

1931, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1935, 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942, 1943, 1944, 1945, 1946, 1947, 1948, 1949,

1950, 1951, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1955, 1956, 1957, 1958, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1967, 1968,

1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1974, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987,

1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006,

2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025,

2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030, 2031, 2032, 2033, 2034, 2035, 2036, 2037, 2038, 2039, 2040, 2041, 2042, 2043, 2044,

2045, 2046, 2047, 2049, 2050, 2051, 2052, 2053, 2054, 2056, 2057, 2058(Part), 2059(Part), 2060, 2061, 2062, 2063,

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7151

2064, 2065, 2066, 2067, 2068, 2069, 2070, 2071, 2072, 2073, 2074, 2075, 2076, 2077, 2078, 2079, 2080, 2081,

2082(Part), 2083, 2084, 2085, 2086, 2087.

(3) Village – Bari :

8(Part), 9(Part), 10(Part), 11(part), 12(Part), 14(Part), 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26(Part), 27, 28(Part),

29(Part), 31(Part), 32(Part), 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56,

57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70,71, 72, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, ,84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90,

91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98 ,99, 100,101,102,103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112 ,113, 114, 115, 116, 117,

118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136 ,137, 138,

139, 140, 141(part), 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162,

163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 173 (part), 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185,

186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194, 196(part), 197(part), 198(part), 199,200, 201, 202, 203(part), 204(part),

205(part), 206(part), 208(part), 210 (part), 211(part), 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223,

224(part), 225, 226, 227 ,228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 242(part), 243(part), 244, 245,

246(part), 247(part), 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266,

267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290,

291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 299, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314,

315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338,

339, 340, 341 ,342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 347, 348, 349, 350, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 360, 361,362,

363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 380, 381, 382, 383, 384, 385, 386,

387, 388, 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410,

411, 412, 413, 414 ,415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420,421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434,

435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457,

458, 459, 460, 461, 462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477, 479(part), 480(part),

481, 482, 483, 484, 485, 486, 487, 488, 489, 490, 491, 492, 493, 497, 498, 499, 500, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507,

508, 509, 510, 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 517, 518, 519, 520, 521, 522, 523, 524, 525, 526, 527, 528, 529, 530, 531,

532, 533, 534, 535, 536, 537, 538, 539, 540, 541, 542, 543, 544, 545, 546, 547, 548, 549, 550, 551, 552, 553, 554, 555,

556, 557, 558, 559, 560, 561, 562, 563, 564, 565, 566, 567, 568 ,569, 570, 571, 572, 573, 574, 575, 576, 577, 578, 579,

580, 581, 582, 583, 584, 585, 586, 587, 588, 589, 590, 591, 592, 593, 594, 595, 596, 597, 598, 599, 600, 601 ,602, 603,

604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 612, 613, 614, 615, 616, 617, 618, 619, 620, 621, 622, 623, 624, 625, 626, 627,

628, 629, 630, 631, 632, 633, 634, 635, 636, 637, 638, 639, 640, 641, 642, 643, 644, 645, 646, 647, 648, 649, 650, 651,

652, 653, 654, 655, 656, 657, 658, 659, 660 ,661, 662, 663, 664, 665, 667, 668, 669, 670, 671, 672, 673, 674, 675, 676,

677, 678, 679, 680 ,681, 682, 683, 684, 685, 686, 687, 688, 689, 690, 691, 692, 693, 694, 695, 696, 697, 698, 699, 700,

701, 702, 703, ,705, 706, 707, 708, 709, 710, 711, 712, 713, 714, 715, 716 ,717, 718, 719, 720, 721, 722, 723, 724, 725,

726, 727, 728, 729, 730, 731, 732, ,734, 735, 736, 737, 738, 739, 740, 741, 742, 743, 744, 745, 746, 747, 748, 749, 750,

751, 752, 753, 754, 755, 756, 757, 758, 759, 760, 761, 762, 763, 764, 765, 766, 767, 768, 769, 770, 771, 772, 773, 774,

775, 776, 778, 779, 780, 781, 782, 783, 784, 785, 786, 787, 788, 789, 790, 791, 792, 793, 794, 795, 796, 797, 798, 799,

800, 801, 802, 803, 804, 805, 806, 807, 808, 809, 810, 811, 812, 813, 814, 815, 816, 817, 818, 819, 820, 821, 822, 823,

824, 825, 826, 827, 828, 829, 830, 831, 832, 833, 834, 834, 835, 836, 837, 838, 839, 840, 841, 842, 843, 844, 845, 846,

847, 848, 849, 850, 851, 852, 853, 854, 855, 856, 857, 858, 859, 860, 861, 862, 863, 864, 865, 866, 867, 868, 869, 870,

871 , 872, 873, 874, 875, 876, 877, 878, 879, 880, 881, 882, 883, 884, 885, 886, 887, 888, 889, 890, 891, 892, 893, 894,

895, 896, 897, 898, 899, 900, 901, 902, 903, 904, 905, 906, 907, 908, 909, 910, 911, 912, 913, 914, 915, 916, 917, 918,

919, 920, 921, 922, 923, 924, 925, 926, 927, 928, 929, 930, 931, 932, 933, 934, 935, 936, 937, 938, 939 ,940, 941, 942,

943, 944, 945, 946, 947, 948, 949, 950, 951, 952, 953, 954, 955, 956, 957, 958, 959, 960, 961, 962, 963, 964, 965, 966,

967, 968, 969, 970, 971, 972, 973, 974, 975, 976, 977, 978, 979, 980, 981, 982, 983, 984, 985, 986, 987, 988, 989, 990,

991, 992, 993, 994, 995, 996, 997, 998, 999, 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011,

1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016(Part), 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029,

7152

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1030, 1031, 1032, 1033, 1034, 1035, 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1042, 1043, 1044, 1045, 1046, 1047, 1048,

1049, 1050, 1051, 1052, 1053, 1054, 1055, 1056, 1057, 1058, 1059, 1060, 1061, 1062, 1063, 1064, 1065, 1066(Part),

1067(part, 1070(part), 1090(Part), 1091(Part), 1092(Part), 1093(Part), 1094, 1095, 1096, 1097, 1098, 1099, 1100(Part),

1101, 1102(Part), 1103(Part) ,1104(Part), 1105, 1106, 1107, 1108, 1109, 1110, 1111, 1112, 1113, 1114, 1115, 1116,

1117, 1118, 1119, 1120, 1121, 1122, 1123, 1124, 1125, 1126, 1127, 1128, 1129, 1130, 1131, 1132, 1133, 1134, 1135,

1136, 1137, 1138, 1139, 1140, 1141, 1142, 1143, 1144, 1145, 1146, 1147, 1148, 1149, 1150, 1151, 1152, 1153, 1154,

1155, 1156, 1157, 1158, 1159, 1160, 1161, 1162 ,1163, 1164, 1165, 1166, 1167, 1168, 1169, 1170, 1171, 1172, 1173,

1174, 1175, 1176, 1177, 1178, 1179, 1180, 1181, 1182, 1183, 1184, 1185, 1186, 1187, 1188, 1189, 1190, 1191, 1192,

1193, 1194, 1195, 1196, 1197, 1198, 1199, 1200, 1201, 1202, 1203, 1204, 1205, 1206, 1207, 1208, 1209, 1210, 1211,

1212, 1213, 1214, 1215, 1216, 1217, 1218, 1219, 1220, 1221, 1222, 1223, 1224, 1225, 1226, 1227, 1228, 1229, 1230,

1231, 1232, 1233, 1234, 1235, 1236, 1237, 1238, 1239, 1240, 1241, 1242, 1243, 1244, ,1246, 1247 ,1248, 1249, 1250,

1251, 1252, 1253, 1254, 1255, 1256, 1257, 1258, 1259, 1260, 1261, 1262, 1263, 1264, 1265, 1266, 1267, 1268, 1269,

1270, 1271, 1272, 1273, 1274, 1275, 1276, 1276, 1277, 1278, 1279, 1280, 1281, 1282, 1283, 1284, 1285, 1286, 1287,

1288, 1289, 1290, 1291, 1292, 1293, 1294, 1295, 1296, 1297, 1298, 1299, 1300, 1301, 1302, 1303, 1304, 1305, 1306,

1307, 1308, 1309, 1310, 1311, 1312, 1314, 1315, 1316, 1317, 1318, 1319, 1320, 1321, 1322, 1323, 1324, 1325, 1326,

1327, 1328, 1329, 1330, 1331, 1332, 1333 ,1334 ,1335, 1336, 1337, 1338, 1339, 1340, 1341, 1342, 1343, 1344, 1345,

1346, 1347, 1348, 1349, 1350, 1351, 1352, 1353, 1354, 1355, 1356 ,1357, 1358, 1359, 1360, 1361, 1362, 1363, 1364,

1365, 1366, 1367, 1368, 1369, 1370, 1371, 1372, 1373, 1374, ,1376, 1377, 1378, 1379, 1380, 1381, 1382, 1383, 1384,

1385, 1386, 1387, 1388, 1389, 1390, 1391, 1392, 1393, 1394, 1395, 1396, 1397, 1398, 1399, 1400, 1401, 1402, 1403,

1404, 1405, 1406, 1407, 1408, 1409, 1410, 1411, 1412, 1413, 1414, 1415, 1416, 1417, 1418, 1419, 1420, 1421, 1422,

1423, 1424, 1425, 1426, ,1428, 1429, 1430, 1431, 1432, 1433, 1434, 1435, 1436, 1437, 1438, 1439, 1440, 1441, 1442,

1443, 1444, 1445, 1446, 1447, 1448, 1449, 1450, 1451, 1452, 1453, 1454, 1455, 1456, 1457, 1458, 1459, 1460, 1461,

1462, 1463, 1464, 1465, 1466, 1467, 1468, 1469, 1470, 1471, 1472, 1473, 1474, 1475, 1476, 1477, 1478, 1479, 1480,

1481(Part), 1482, 1483, 1484, 1485, 1486, 1487, 1488, 1489, 1490, 1491, 1492(Part), 1493, 1494(Part), 1511(Part),

1512(Part), 1513(Part), 1514(Part), 1515, 1516, 1517, 1518, 1519(Part), 1520, 1521, 1522, 1523, 1524, 1525, 1526,

1527, 1528, 1529, 1530, 1531, 1532, 1533, 1534, 1535, 1536, 1537, 1538, 1539, 1540, 1541, 1542, 1543, 1544, 1545,

1546, 1547, 1548, 1549, 1550, 1551, 1552, 1553, 1554 ,1555 ,1556 1557, 1558, 1559, 1560 ,1561, 1562, 1563, 1564,

1565, ,1567, 1568, 1569, 1570, 1571, 1572, 1573, 1574, 1575, 1576, 1577, 1578, 1579, 1580, 1581, 1582, 1583, 1584,

1585, 1586, 1587, 1588, 1589, 1590, 1591, 1592, 1593, 1594, 1595, 1596, 1597, 1598, 1599, 1600, 1601, 1602, 1603,

1604, 1605, 1606, 1607, 1608, 1609, 1610, 1611, 1612, 1613 ,1614, 1615, 1616, 1617, 1618, 1619, 1620, 1621, 1622,

1623, 1624, 1625, 1626, 1627, 1628, 1629, 1630, 1631 ,1632, 1633, 1634, 1635, 1636, 1637, 1638, 1639, 1640, 1641,

1642, 1643, 1644, 1645, 1646, 1647, 1648, 1649, 1650, 1651, 1652, 1653, 1654, 1655, ,1657, 1658, 1659, 1660, 1661,

1662, 1663, 1664, 1665, 1666, 1667, 1668, 1669, 1670, 1671, 1672, 1673, 1674, 1675, 1676, 1677, 1678, 1679, 1680,

1681, 1682, 1683, 1684, 1685, 1686, 1687, 1688, 1689, 1690, 1691, 1692, 1693, 1694, 1695, 1696, 1697, 1698, 1699,

1700, 1701, 1702, 1703, 1704, 1705, 1706, 1708, 1709, 1710, 1711, 1712, 1713, 1714, 1715, 1716, 1717, 1718, 1719,

1720, 1721, 1722, 1723, 1724, 1725, 1726, 1727, 1728, 1729, 1730, 1731, 1732, 1733, 1734, 1735, 1736, 1737, 1738,

1739, 1740, 1741, 1742, 1743, 1744, 1745, 1746, 1747, 1748, 1749, 1750, 1751, 1752, 1753, 1754, 1755, 1756, 1757,

1758, 1759, 1760, 1761, 1762, 1763, 1764, 1765, 1766, 1767, 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1772, 1773, 1774, 1775, 1776,

1777, 1778, 1779, 1780, 1781, 1782, 1783, 1784, 1785, 1786, 1786, 1787(part), 1788(Part), 1789(part), 1790(part),

1794(Part), 1826(part), 1827, 1828, 1829(part), 1830, 1831, 1832, 1833, 1834, 1835, 1836, 1837, 1838, 1839, 1840,

1841, 1842, 1843, 1844, 1845(part), 1846(Part), 1848(part), 1850(Part), 1852, 1853, 1854, 1855, 1856, 1857, 1858,

1859, 1860, 1861, 1862, 1863, 1864, 1865, 1866, 1867, 1868, 1869, 1870, 1871, 1872, 1873, 1874, 1875, 1876, 1877,

1878, 1879, 1880, 1881, 1882, 1883, 1884, 1885, 1886, 1887, 1888, 1889, 1890, 1891, 1892, 1893, 1894, 1895, 1896,

1897, 1898, 1899, 1900, 1901, 1902, 1903, 1904, 1905, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1909, 1910(part), 1911, 1912, 1913, 1914,

1915, 1916(Part), 1917(Part), 1930(Part), 1937(part), 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941(Part), 1942(Part), 1947(Part), 1950(Part),

1952, 1953, 1954, 1955, 1956, 1957, 1958, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962(Part), 1964(Part), 1971(Part), 1987(part), 1988(Part),

1989(Part), 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006,

2007, 2008, 2009, 2010(Part), 2011(Part), 2012(Part), 2013(Part), 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021,

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7153

2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030, 2031, 2032, 2033, 2034, 2035, 2038, 2039, 2040, 2041, 2042,

2043, 2044, 2045, 2046, 2047, 2048, 2049, 2050, 2051, 2052, 2053, 2054, 2055(Part), 2057, 2058(Part), 2057(Part),

2059, 2060(Part), 2061(Part), 2066(Part), 2067, 2068(Part), 2069(Part), 2070(Part), 2071, 2072, 2073(Part), 2074(Part),

2075(Part), 2078, 2079(Part), 2080(Part), 2101(part), 2155(Part), 2156(Part), 2157(Part), 2158(Part), 2159(Part),

2160(Part), 2161(Part), 2162, 2163, 2164, 2165, 2166, 2167, 2168, 2169, 2170, 2171, 2172, 2173, 2174, 2177(Part),

2174(Part), 2797(part), 2800, 2805, 2809(Part), 2811, 2813, 2815, 2816, 2817, 2818, 2819, 2820, 2821, 2822, 2823,

2824, 2825, 2826, 2827, 2829, 2830, 2831(Part), 2833, 2835, 2836, 2803, 2160(Part), 2799(Part), 2798, 2037, 1851,

1930(part), 2036, 2831(Part).

(4) Village – Barwadih :

1(Part ), 2, 3(Part), 4(Part), 5(Part), 6(Part), 7, 8(Part), 9, 10, 11, 12, 13(Part), 14(Part), 15(Part), 35(Part), 39(Part),

145(Part), 146, 147(Part), 148, 149(Part), 180(Part), 181(Part), 182(Part), 183, 184(Part), 185, 186, 187, 188(Part) ,

509(Part).

(5) Village – Tota :

1, 3, 4, 5, 6(Part), 7(Part), 9 (Part), 10(Part), 11(Part), 12(Part), 69(Part).

(6) Village - Rampur :

918(Part), 919(Part), 920, 921(Part), 925(Part), 928(Part), 932(Part), 933(Part), 934, 935, 936, 937, 938, 939, 940, 941,

942, 943, 944(Part), 945, 946, 947, 948, 949, 950, 951, 952, 953, 954, 955(Part), 956, 957, 958(Part), 960(Part),

964(Part), 965(Part), 970(Part), 971, 972(Part), 973(Part), 977(Part), 978(Part), 998(Part), 999, 1000, 1001, 1002,

1003(Part), 1006(Part), 1007, 1008, 1009(Part), 1011(Part), 1042(Part).

(7) Village - Surli :

1, 2, 3, 6, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 13, 16(Part), 19, 20, 24, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31(Part), 34(Part), 115(Part), 116(Part), 117(Part),

118, 119, 120(Part), 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 128(Part), 129, 130, 131, 132(Part), 135, 136, 140, 141, 142(Part), 143, 144,

145(Part), 165(Part), 166(Part), 168, 169, 170, 171, 172(Part), 173(Part), 174(Part), 176(Part), 177, 178(Part), 179(Part),

203(Part), 444(Part), 447(Part), 621(Part).

List of Forest Cadastral Survey plot numbers to be acquired:

1. Village Ate : 24.

Village Bari

: 1303, 62, 9, 6 (Part), 5 (Part), 4 (Part), 1281, 1283, 35, 187, 91, 116, 93, 114, 1310 (Part),

771 (Part).

Village Surli

: 296 (Part), 1 (Part), 305.

Village Tota

: 2 (Part), 144(Part).

Boundary description:

Line A – A1 – B – B1 - B2 – B3 – B4 – B5 – B6 – B7 – C : The line starts from point ‘A’ inside the plot no.732 of

Banhardi village (Thana Chandwa) moves in North-east direction to point A1 inside plot no.732 of Banhardi village.

Line moves in East direction from point A1 to point B through plot nos.719, 685, 1563, 1648, 1687 in Banhardi village.

Further line moves to Southeast direction from Point B to B1 in Plot no.120 of Surli village through Plot nos. 16, 31 in

forest land of Surli village. From point B1 line moves in Southeast direction to point B2 in plot no.128 of Surli village

7154

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

through plot no.128 in Surli village. From point B2 line moves in Southeast direction to point B3 in Plot no.1066 in Bari

village through Plot nos.115, 166, 172, 447 in Surli village and through Plot nos.1016, 1066 in Bari village. Line moves

further in Southeast direction from point B3 to point B4 in Plot no.1788 in Bari village through Plot nos.1093, 1100,

1103, 1104 in Bari village. Further block boundary line moves in Southeast direction form point B4 to point B5 in Plot

no.1848 in Bari village through Plot nos.1789, 1787, 1826, 1845 in Bari village. Further line moves in Southeast

direction from point B5 to point B6 in Plot no.1964 in Bari village through Plot nos. 1916, 1910, 1950, 1962 in village

Bari. Further line moves in Southeast direction through Plot nos. 1987, 1988 in Bari village and Plot nos. 918, 919, 928,

in Rampur village form point B6 to point B7 in Plot no.944 in Rampur village. Line moves in Southeast direction from

point B7 to point C in Plot no.1011 in Rampur village, through Plot nos. 972, 955, 1009 in Rampur village.

Line C- C1- C2 – C3 – C4 – C5 – D : The line moves in South direction from point C in Plot no.1011 in Rampur village

to point C1 in Plot no.2010 in Bari village. Further line moves in Southwest direction from point C1 to point C2 in Plot

no.2080 in Bari village through Plot nos.2012, 2075, 2074 in Bari village. Line moves in Southwest direction from point

C2 to C3 in Plot no.2073 in Bari village through plot nos.2080, 2073 in Bari village. Further line continue to move in

Southwest direction from point C3 to point C4 in Plot no.192 in Ate village through Plot nos. 2060, 2058, 2156, 2159,

2174, 1514, 1492 in Bari village and Plot nos. 385, 273, 275, 206, 201 in Ate village. Further line moves in Southwest

direction from point C4 to point C5 in Plot no.14 in Barwadih village through Plot nos.194, 179, 164, 1106 in Ate village

and Plot nos.509, 149, 145, 39 in Barwadih village. From point C5 line further moves in West direction to point D in Plot

no.6 in forest land of Tota village through Plot nos.15, 6, 3 in Barwadih village and Plot nos. 12, 11, 7 in Tota village.

Line D – D1 – D2 –D3 –D4 –D5 –D6 –D7 –D8 –D9 –D10 –D11 –D12 -D13 -D14 –E : Line moves in Northwest

direction from point D to point D1 in Plot no.6 in forest land of Tota village. Further line moves along the Nala in Tota

village Plot no.69 through point D2 and D3 and through point D4, D5, D6, D7, D8, D9, D10, D11, D12, and D13 in Plot

no. 204 in Bari village and through point D14 in Plot no.8 in forest land of Bari village to point E in Plot no.8 in forest

land of Bari village.

Line E-A : The Line moves in North direction from point ‘E’ in Plot no.8 in forest land of Bari village to end at point ‘A’

in Plot no.732 in Banhardi village through Plot nos. 8,9, 10, 12 in forest land of Bari village and Plot nos. 11, 26, 29, 31

in Bari village and Plot nos. 1193, 1131, 1005, 991, 350, 386, 735 in Banhardi village.

[F. No. 43015/40/2017-LA & IR]

RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Dy. Secy.

नई दली, 10 अ1 तूबर, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 1818

1818

1818.—के3!ीय सरकार को यह -तीत होता है क इससे उपाब‡ अनुसूची म वUणत पWरFेO क भूिम म से

कोयला अिभ-ाZ होने क संभावना है ;

और, उ= अनुसूची म वUणत भूिम के FेO म अंतUव] करने वाला रेखांक सं6यांक आरईवी/02/2019, तारीख

14 अग"त, 2019 का िनरीFण सbल कोलफस िलिमटेड (भूिम और राज"व िवभाग), दरभंगा हाउस, राँची – 834029

(झारखwड) के काया,लय म या महा-बंधक, सbल कोलफस िलिमटेड, ढोरी FेO, िजला बोकारो (झारखwड) या उपायु=,

िजला बोकारो (झारखंड) या महा-बंधक (खोज -भाग) आर.आई.-III, के3!ीय खान योजना और िडजाईन सं"थान, गडवाना

पैलेस, कांके रोड, राँची- 834 031 (झारखंड) के काया,लय म या कोयला िनयंOक, 1, काउंिसल हाउस "bीट, कोलकाता-

700001 के काया,लय म कया जा सकता है ।

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7155

अतः अब, क!ीय सरकार, कोयला धारक FेO (अज,न और िवकास) अिधिनयम, 1957 (1957 का 20) (िजसे इसम

इसके प^ात उ= अिधिनयम कहा गया है) क धारा 4 क उप-धारा (1) ;ारा -दत शि=य का -योग करते &ए, उ=

अनुसूचP म वUणत भूिम म कोयले का पूवˆFण करने के अपने आशय क सूचना देती है ;

उपरो= उिलिखत अनुसूचP म वUणत भूिम म िहतब‡ कोई S यक् ित, -

(i)

भूिम के संपूण, या कसी भाग या उ= भूिम म या उसके ऊपर कसी अिधकार के अज,न पर आFेप कर

सकेगा ; अथवा

(ii)

उ1 त अिधिनयम क धारा 4 क उप-धारा (3) के अधीन क गयी कसी काय,वाही से &ई या होने वाली

संभािवत कसी Fित के िलए अिधिनयम क धारा 6 के अधीन -ितकर का दावा कर सकेगा ; अथवा

(iii)

उ1 त अिधिनयम क पूवˆFण अनुVिp तय के -भावहीन होने के संबंध म धारा 13 क उप-धारा (1) के

अधीन या खनन पtे -भावहीन होने के िलए उ1 त अिधिनयम क धारा 13 क उप-धारा (4) के अधीन

-ितकर का दावा कर सकेगा और उसे उ1 त अिधनयम क धारा 13 क उपधारा (1) के खंड (i) से खंड (iv)

म िविनDदE ट मद क बाबत उपगत S यय को उपदUशत करने के िलए पूव’1 त भूिम से संबंिधत सभी

मानिचO, चाट… और अ3 य द" तावेज को पWरदR त कर सकेगा,

इस अिधसूचना के राजपO म -काशन क तारीख से नkबे दन के भीतर महा-बंधक, सbल कोलफस िलिमटेड, ढोरी FेO,

िजला बोकारो (झारखwड) या महा-बंधक, सbल कोलफस िलिमटेड, भूिम और राज"व िवभाग, दरभंगा हाउस, राँची –

834029 (झारखwड) को भेजगे ।

अनुसूची

क0याणी िववृ<

क0याणी िववृ< प"रयोजना

प"रयोजना

िजला बोकारो (झारख4ड)

( रेखांक सं6यांक आरईवी/ 02/ 2019, तारीख 14 अग"त, 2019 )

kलॉक सं6या

uाम

थाना सं.

थाना

िजला

FेO

Wटpपिणयां

हे1टेयर म

एकड़ म

ए

मकोली

च3!पुरा

बोकारो

04.31

10.65

भाग

बी

मकोली

च3!पुरा

बोकारो

132.17

326.59

भाग

सी

तुWरओ

च3!पुरा

बोकारो

94.59

233.73

भाग

डी

तुWरओ

च3!पुरा

बोकारो

52.81

130.49

भाग

ई

तारमी

च3!पुरा

बोकारो

0.66

1.63

भाग

एफ

तारमी

च3!पुरा

बोकारो

41.05

101.43

भाग

कुल :

325.59 हे1टेयर

(लगभग)

804.52 एकड़

(लगभग)

7156

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

सीमा

सीमा - वण न

वण न

वण न: : : :

kलॉक

सीमा रेखा

सीमा वण,न

ए

क-ख-ग-क

रेखा, िब3दु ‘क’ से आरंभ होती है और िब3दु ‘ख’ और ‘ग’ से होते &ए गुजरती

है और मकोली uाम के आरंिभक िब3दु ‘क’ पर िमलती है ।

बी

घ-ड.-च-छ-ज-झ- ञ -ट-ठ-ड-

घ

रेखा, िब3दु ‘घ’ से आरंभ होती है और िब3दु ड., च, छ, ज, झ, ञ, ट, ठ और ‘ड’

से होते &ए गुजरती है और मकोली uाम के आरंिभक िब3दु ‘घ’ पर िमलती है ।

सी

ञ-ट-ण-त-थ-द- ञ

रेखा, िब3दु ‘ञ’ से आरंभ होती है और िब3दु ट, ण, त, थ और ‘द’ से गुजरते &ए

उतरती है और तुWरओ uाम के आरंिभक िब3दु ‘ञ’ पर िमलती है ।

डी

ध-न-प-फ-ण-ब-भ-ध

रेखा, िब3दु ‘ध’ से आरंभ होती है और िब3दु न, प, फ, ण, ब और ‘भ’ से होते

&ए उतरती है और तुWरओ uाम के आरंिभक िब3दु ‘ध’ पर िमलती है ।

ई

न-प-म-न

रेखा, िब3दु ‘न’ से आरंभ होती है और िब3दु ‘प’ और ‘म’ से होते &ए गुजरती है

और तारमी uाम के आरंिभक िब3दु ‘न’ पर िमलती है ।

एफ

झ- ञ -द-द1-झ

रेखा, िब3दु ‘झ’ से आरंभ होती है और िब3दु ञ, द और द1 से होते &ए गुजरती

है और तुWरओ uाम के आरंिभक िब3दु ‘झ’ पर िमलती है ।

[फा. सं. 43015/17/2019-एलए एंड आईआर]

राम िशरोमिण सरोज, उप सिचव

New Delhi, the 10^th October, 2019

S.O. 1818.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that coal is likely to be obtained from the land in

the locality described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

And, whereas, the plan bearing number Rev/02/2019, dated the 14^th August, 2019 containing details of the

areas of land described in the said Schedule may be inspected at the office of the Central Coalfields Limited (Land and

Revenue Department), Darbhanga House, Ranchi- 834029 (Jharkhand) or at the office of the General Manager, Central

Coalfields Limited, Dhori Area, District Bokaro (Jharkhand) or at the office of the Deputy Commissioner, District

Bokaro (Jharkhand) or at the office of the General Manager (Exploration Division), RI- III, Central Mine Planning and

Design Institute, Gondwana Palace, Kanke Road, Ranchi -834 031 (Jharkhand) or at the office of the Coal Controller, 1,

Council House Street, Kolkata- 700 001.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas

(Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the Central Government

hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal in land described in the said Schedule ;

Any person interested in the land described in the above mentioned Schedule may -

(i)

object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or of any rights in or over the said land; or

(ii)

claim compensation under section 6 of the said Act for any damage caused or likely to be caused by

any action taken under sub-section (3) of section 4 thereof; or

(iii)

claim compensation under sub-section (1) of section 13 of the said Act in respect of prospecting license

ceasing to have effect or under sub-section (4) of section 13 of the said Act, for mining lease ceasing to

have effect and deliver all maps, charts and other documents relating to the aforesaid land to show the

expenditure incurred in respect of items specified in clauses (i) to (iv) of sub-section (1) of section 13

of the said Act,

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7157

to the office of the General Manager, Central Coalfields Limited, Dhori Area, District Bokaro (Jharkhand) or General

Manager, Central Coalfields Limited, Land and Revenue Department, Darbhanga House, Ranchi- 834029 (Jharkhand)

within a period of ninety days from the date of publication of this notification.

SCHEDULE

Kalyani Opencast Project

District Bokaro ( Jharkhand)

[ Plan bearing number Rev/02/2019, dated the 14^th August, 2019 ]

Block

number

Village

Thana

number

Thana

District

Area

Remarks

in hectares

in acres

Makoli

Chandrapura

Bokaro

04.31

10.65

Part

Makoli

Chandrapura

Bokaro

132.17

326.59

Part

Turio

Chandrapura

Bokaro

94.59

233.73

Part

Turio

Chandrapura

Bokaro

52.81

130.49

Part

Tarmi

Chandrapura

Bokaro

0.66

1.63

Part

Tarmi

Chandrapura

Bokaro

41.05

101.43

Part

Total :

325.59

hectares

(approxi-

mately )

804.52 acres

(approxi-

mately)

Boundary description:

Block

Boundary Line

Boundary description

A-B-C-A

Line starts from point ‘A’ and passes through points ‘B’ and ‘C’ and meets at

starting point ‘A’ of Makoli village.

D-E-F-G-H-I-J-K-L-M-D

Line starts from point ‘D’ and passes through points E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L and M

and meets at starting point ‘D’ of Makoli village.

J-K-O-P-Q-R-J

Line starts from point ‘J’ and passes through points K, O, P, Q and R and meets

at starting point ‘J’ of Turio village.

S-T-U-V-O-W-X-S

Line starts from point ‘S’ and passes through points T, U, V, O, W and X and

meets at starting point ‘S’ of Turio village.

T-U-Y-T

Line starts from point ‘T’ and passes through points U and Y and meets at

starting point ‘T’ of Tarmi village.

I-J-R-R1-I

Line starts from point ‘I’ and passes through points J, R and R1 and meets at

starting point ‘I’ of Turio village.

[F. No. 43015/17/2019-LA & IR]

RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Dy. Secy.

7158

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

$म एवं रोजगार मंालय

नई द ली, 1 अ1 तूबर, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ.1819

1819

1819.—औ\ोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) क धारा 17 के अनुसरण म के3!ीय सरकार

मेसस, मेटलाईफ इिwडया इंs योरस कंपनी -ाइवेट िलिमटेड के -बंधतंO के संब‡ िनयोजक और उनके कम,कार के बीच

अनुबंध म िनDद] औ\ोिगक िववाद म के3!ीय सरकार औ\ोिगक अिधकरण एवं $म 3यायालय, कोलकाता के पंचाट

(संदभ, सं6या 04/2010) को -कािशत करती है जो के3!ीय सरकार को 25.09.2019 को -ाZ &आ था।

[सं. एल-17012/49/2008-आईआर (एम)]

डी. के. िहमांशु, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 1^st October, 2019

S.O. 1819.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 04/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Kolkata now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. Metlife India Insurance Company Pvt. Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 25.09.2019.

[No. L-17012/49/2008-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA

Reference No. 04 of 2010

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of M/s. Metlife India Insurance Company Pvt. Ltd.

AND

Their workmen

Present: Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra, Presiding Officer

Appearance:

On behalf of the Management :

Mr. K.C Garg, learned counsel with

Mr. D. Khan, learned counsel.

On behalf of the Workmen :

Mr. S. Mukherjee, learned counsel

Dated: 12^thSeptember, 2019

Industry: Insurance

AWARD

By Order No.L-17012/49/2008-IR(M) dated 27.04.2009 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in

exercise of its powers under Section 10(1)(d) and (2A) referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

“Whether the action of the management of Met Life Insurance Company Pvt. Ltd. by terminating the service of

Smt. Mohua Ghosh w.e.f. 3/12/2007 is justified? To what relief the workman is entitled?”

The workman under reference filed her statement of claim pleading inter alia that she was appointed in the

company as Coordinator Sales on 5^th March, 2003. In her appointment letter the company arbitrarily and with mala fide

intention stipulated clause No. 6 which is not maintainable in the eye of law. Despite her protest with regard to clause

No. 6 it was stated that the company has prescribed printed proforma and as such no addition or alteration can be made.

In the compelling circumstances she received her appointment letter dated 5^th March, 2003 without prejudice to her right

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7159

and contention. She rendered service in the company for years as a permanent workman without any break and always

performed her duties sincerely. Though she was designated as Sales Coordinator, she was mainly entrusted with the job

of clerical nature. She did not enjoy the power to sanction leave, to punish and also expel employees. She did not have

supervising power also. Due to her devotion to work, the company has also enhanced her salary. In the year 2007 her

immediate supervisor, Mr. Krishnendu Bhunia started harassing her out of his personal malice and grudge, and

humiliated her in front of other colleagues and asked her to leave the office without any reason. All of a sudden on 3^rd

December, 2007 the management without any reason and justification and without issuing any previous

notice/chargesheet terminated her with effect from 3^rd December, 2007. After receiving the said termination order the

workman sent a letter on 4^th January, 2008 raising protest against illegal, unlawful and arbitrary act on the part of the

management. Having no other alternative the workman also submitted a letter to the Regional Labour Commissioner

(Central), Kolkata on 25^th March, 2008 who tried his best to solve the dispute by holding several joint conferences, but

the settlement could not be arrived due to the adamant attitude of the management. Therefore, failure report was

submitted by the Regional Labour Commissioner, resulting in the present reference.

The management of Metlife India Insurance Company Ltd. submitted its written statement that the statement of

claim is not maintainable. The workman under reference does not come within the definition of workman as defined in

Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter called the Act of 1947 for convenience) as she was

designated as an Executive Field Operation and her work profile consisted largely work of official work of supervisory

and managerial nature. The burden lies on the workman under reference to prove that she comes within the definition of

workman. The dispute in question does not fall within the definition of industrial dispute as defined under Section 2(k) of

the Act of 1947. It is further pleaded that the workman under reference was appointed in Kakurgachi Branch of the

company by the appointment letter dated 05.03.2003 which sets out the terms of appointment. The appointment letter is a

binding contract between the workman and the company which provided for termination or resignation of service with

three months’ notice or salary in lieu thereof computed on the basis of CTC. The workman was promoted as an

Executive Field Operation on 15^th March, 2007. Thereafter her work profile consisted of official work of supervisory and

managerial nature including scrutiny of applications, keeping track of dishonored cheques, handling customer query,

dealing with incoming and outgoing correspondences etc. She also performed additional supervisory function in order to

ensure that agents of the company, Sales Officers, Sales Managers etc handle and deal with applications of insurance in

correct and proper manner and further to supervise that such applications were filled in proper manner. The company

terminated her service in accordance with the terms of her letter of appointment with effect from 3^rd December, 2007. On

11^th February, 2008 the company entered into a full and final settlement with the workman which specifically provided

that the employee did not have any claim or outstanding issue against the company effective from 3^rd December, 2007.

The workman concerned had filed a complaint before the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), Kolkata on false

grounds.

The workman concerned had also submitted her rejoinder to the written statement filed by the company refuting

the allegations made in the written statement.

On behalf of the workman, the workman concerned herself WW-01, Smt. Mahua Ghosh and on behalf of the

company MW-01, Smt. Sampa Das have been examined as witnesses.

I have heard both the parties and gone through the oral as well as documentary evidences. Parties have also filed

written notes of argument.

On the perusal of pleadings of the parties the basic question which has cropped up for consideration is whether

the workman under reference is a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947? Case

of the workman is that though she has been designated as Sales Coordinator, but she was mainly entrusted with the job of

all clerical nature. She was not entrusted with the power to sanction leave, to punish and to expel any employee. She had

also no supervising power. Contrary to it the management has submitted that the workman was appointed as Sales

Coordinator in Kankurgachi Branch of the company and had worked as an Executive, Field Operations. The job profile

of the workman consisted largely of official work of supervisory and managerial nature including scrutiny of

applications, return of cheques, handling customers’ queries and complaints as representative of the company, dealing

with incoming and outgoing correspondences etc. She had also performed supervisory function in order to ensure that the

agents of the company, Sales Officers, Sales Managers etc., handle and deal with applications for insurance in a correct

and proper manner.

Before dwelling upon the respective submissions of parties, it is apposite to look at the definition of workman

given in Section 2(s) of the Act if 1847 which is as follows:

“2(s)

“workman” means any person (including an apprentice) employed in

any industry to do any manual,

unskilled, skilled, technical, operational, clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward, whether the terms of

employment be express or implied, and for the purposes of any proceeding under this Act in relation to an industrial

dispute, includes any such person who has been dismissed, discharged or retrenched in connection with, or as a

7160

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

consequence of, that dispute, or whose dismissal, discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include

any such person –

(i)

who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950(45of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy

Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or

(ii)

who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of prison; or

(iii)

who is employed mainly in a managerial or administrative capacity; or who, being employed in a

supervisory capacity, draws wages exceeding then thousand rupees per mensem or exercises, either by

the nature of the duties attached to the office or by reason of the powers vested in him, functions

mainly of a managerial nature.”

From above provision of Section 2(s) of the Act of 1947 it is vividly clear that any person who is employed

mainly in managerial and administrative capacity does not come within the definition of workman. However, case of the

employee concerned is that designation does not decide whether she is a workman or not, but the dominant nature of

work determine the status of workman. During her employment she was doing mainly clerical job without power to

sanction leave, to punish or expel any employee etc. Thus relying on Arkal Gobind Rao v. Ciba Geigy of India Ltd.,

AIR 1985 SC 985 it has been submitted that where an employee has multifarious duties it is the primary and basic duties

of the employee which decide whether she is a workman or not. In above cited case the employee was appointed as an

Assistant and continued to render service in that post till his termination. On the basis of documentary evidence the

Labour Court was of the opinion that though he was doing some clerical work, he was also doing supervisory and

administrative work and other work of checking bank reconciliation, therefore, he was not a workman within the

meaning of the Act. The Hon’ble Supreme Court held –

“6.

Where an employee has multifarious duties and a question is raised whether he is a workman or

someone other than a workman the Court must find out what are the primary and basic duties of the person

concerned and if he is incidentally asked to do some other work, may not necessarily be in tune with the basic

duties, these additional duties cannot change the character and status of the person concerned. In other words,

the dominant purpose of employment must be first taken into consideration and the gloss of some additional

duties must be rejected while determining the status and character of the person. Appreciation of evidence by

Labour Court cannot be faulted but it landed itself into an erroneous conclusion by drawing impermissible

inference from the evidence and overlooking the primary requirement of the principal and subsidiary duties of

the appellant.”

10.

Now it is the duty of the employee concerned to prove that though she was appointed as Sales Coordinator, her

primary and basic duties were of clerical nature and she was incidentally doing managerial work. In Manager, Reserve

Bank of India v. S. Many, 2005 LLR 737 it was held by the Hon’ble Apex Court that it is only if the initial burden of

proof which was on the workman was discharged to some extent, that a finding can be returned in respect of the defence

of the management. Furthermore, a plea having been set up by the workman, the initial burden of proof was on the

workman that he had been employed by the petitioner in the claimed capacity on the stated terms. Thus burden lies on the

employee concerned to prove that despite her appointment to the post of Sales Coordinator, she was doing the job of

clerical nature.

11.

The case of the workman is that she was appointed as Sales Coordinator and was doing mainly job of clerical

nature. In paragraph 27 of the statement of claim she has also enumerated some of the work assigned to her by the

company wjhich includes

Cash handling,

Checking of the application form,

Data entry,

Coordinating with the diagnostic centre wherever medical is to be done,

Keeping track of cheque dishonours,

Handling renewals and lapsation,

Attending to customer query (both internal and external) and

Job as assigned and/or directed by the Assistant Manager.

The management of the company has not denied the averments made in paragraph 27 of the statement of claim, rather

contents of paragraph 27 have been admitted in paragraph 17 of the written statement. From perusal of paragraph 27 of

the statement of claim it appears that all works assigned to the workman were certainly of clerical nature. The

management has pleaded that the workman also performed additional supervisory functions in order to ensure that the

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7161

agents of the company, sales officers, sales managers etc., handle and deal with applications for insurance in correct and

proper manner and further supervise that such applications were filled in properly, in the appropriate format accurately.

Where the averments made by the workman with regard to clerical nature of job has been admitted by the management

and additional supervisory functions are alleged to have been assigned to her, the burden of the workman concerned to

prove that she was doing job of clerical nature is discharged. Now it is the burden of the management to show that some

supervisory work were assigned to her and that too the supervisory work was of dominant nature. In Ananda Bazar

Patrika Ltd. v. its workmen, 1969-II-LLJ 670 the Hon’ble Supreme Court has clearly enunciated the principles in

following words:

“The principle which should be followed in deciding the question whether any person is employed in a

supervisory capacity or on clerical work is that if a person is mainly doing supervisory work, but incidentally

or for a fraction of time also does some clerical work, it would have to be held that he is employed in

supervisory capacity, and, conversely, if the main work done is of clerical nature, the mere fact that some

supervisory duties are carried out incidentally or as a small fraction of work done by him, will not convert his

employment as a clerk into one in supervisory capacity.”

In the above cited case law the principal work that the employee was doing was that of maintaining and writing cash

book and preparing various returns. Being the seniormost clerk he was put in charge of PF section and was given small

amount of control over the clerk of that section. The only power which he enjoyed was to allocate work between these

clerks and also power to recommend leave. These powers enjoyed by the workman concerned were held to be not

sufficient to convert his office of senior clerk into that of supervisor.

12.

In Kulwant Singh v. Reliance Petrochemicals & others, 2000-III-LLJ 766 the Hon’ble Bombay High Court

has held that

“It is now well settled that mere nomenclature of the post is not of much consequence and what is to be seen is

the nature of duties performed by the employee concerned so as to arrive at a correct conclusion as to whether

he was a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Act. The crucial test which will have to be applied

is as to whether the duties performed by the concerned employee were or substantial part thereof was of a

nature as may fall within the definition of workman. Thus what is to be seen is the nature of the substantial

part of work which the employee had to perform. When an employee is employed to do certain types of work

enumerated in the decision of H.R. Adyanthya, there is hardly any difficulty in treating him as a workman for

the classification in conformity of industry or mill or establishment qua such employee, but when such

employee is even required to do more than one kind of work, in such case it becomes necessary to determine

under which classification the employee will fall for the purpose of deciding whether his case comes within the

definition of workman or goes out of it.”

13.

In Bandana Jhoshi v. Standard Chattered Bank, MANU/MH/1391/2010 as cited by the management also

speaks of dominant nature of the work. The Hon’ble Bombay High Court has cited Management of Sonipath

Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd. V. Ajit Singh, 2005 II CLR 66 in which the Hon’ble Apex Court has held that the

question as to whether the employee has been performing clerical work or not is required to be determined upon arriving

at a finding as regards the dominant nature thereof.

14.

In the instant case, as has been seen above, the workman concerned was doing a job of mainly clerical nature.

Some supervisory functions are alleged to have been assigned to her, but neither in written statement nor in the statement

of MW-01 the details of supervisory functions are given. MW-01. Sampa Das has stated in cross-examination that she

had no personal knowledge of what kind of job the concerned workman used to perform. MW-01, Sampa Das has further

stated that:

“Today it is not possible to produce any document to show that Mahua Ghosh was elevated to the post of

Executive Field Operation; but if any opportunity is given I can produce the same. Uptill now no document has

been filed to show that Mahua Ghosh was elevated to the post of Executive Field Operation. I have not filed any

document to show that Coordinator Sales designated post belonged to managerial or administrative cadre.

During tenure of employee of the concerned workman, Mahua Ghosh, no job profile was given to her

specifying her duties and responsibilities. Mahua Ghosh had no power to recruit anybody on behalf of the

company.

I have not filed any paper to show that during the tenure of Mahua Ghosh she sanctioned any increment to the

employees of the company. I have also not filed any document to show that she sanctioned leave to anybody. I

have

not filed any document to show that Mahua Ghosh independently made correspondence to anybody on

behalf of the management but if opportunity is given I can produce the same.”

Above statement of MW-01 shows that no job profile was given to the workman concerned specifying her duties and

responsibilities in absence of which it is difficult to determine that she was having any supervisory capacity in the

7162

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

company. The contents of paragraph 27 of the statement of claim have already been admitted by the management that she

was doing job of clerical nature. Had the job profile been filed by the management, it would have been easier for the

management to establish that she was in managerial or supervisory capacity. Hence, I come to the conclusion that the

management has not discharged its burden to show that some supervisory work was ever assigned to her. Even if it is

presumed that some supervisory work was assigned to her, then also the dominant nature of the work assigned to her

appear to be of clerical nature. Hence she is very well covered by the definition of workman as defined in Section 2(s) of

the Act of 1947.

15.

Where the workman concerned is covered by the definition of workman under Section 2(s) of the Act of 1947all

the provisions of the Act of 1947 are applicable to him/her. Under the Act of 1947 services of a workman can be

dispensed with by an employer either as a measure of disciplinary action or otherwise than disciplinary action.

Admittedly, in the present case the termination of services of the workman was not as a measure of disciplinary action.

No enquiry was conducted before her termination. Where termination is otherwise than a punishment inflicted by way of

disciplinary action, it is said to be a retrenchment as defined under Section 2(oo) of the Act of 1947 which may be

extracted as below –

“2(oo) “retrenchment” means the termination by the employer of the service of a workman for any reason whatsoever,

otherwise than as a punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary action, but does not include –

(a)

voluntary retirement of the workman; or

(b)

retirement of the workman on reaching the age of superannuation if the contract of employment

between the employer and the workman concerned contains a stipulation in that behalf.; of

(bb) termination of the service of the workman as a result of the non-renewal of the contgract of employement

between the employer and the workman concerned on its expiry or of such contract being terminated

under a stipulation in that behalf contained therein; or

(c)

termination of the service of a workman on the ground of continued ill-health.

16.

Above definition of ‘retrenchment’ shows that termination of service of a workman by the employer for any

reason whatsoever comes within the definition of retrenchment when it was not as a measure of punishment. Though

certain exceptions have been given in definition, but case of the workman is not covered by the exceptions. Thus, where

the termination of workman amounts to retrenchment, the employer was bound to comply with the provisions relating to

retrenchment before her services could be dispensed with. Section 25F of the Act of 1947 prescribes certain condition

precedent for retrenchment of a workman. It is apt to extract the provisions of Section 25F of the Act of 1947

25F. Condition precedent to retrenchment of workman – No workman employed in any industry who has been

in continuous service for not less than one year under an employer shall be retrenched by the employer until –

(a)

the workman has been given one month’s notice in writing indicating the reasons for retrenchment and

the period of notice has expired, or the workman has been paid in lieu of such notice, wages for the

period of notice;

(b)

the workman has been paid, at the time of retrenchment, compensation which shall be equivalent to

fifteen days’ average pay for every completed year of continuous service or any part thereof in excess

of six months; and

(c)

notice in the prescribed manner is served on the appropriate Government or such authority as may be

specified by the appropriate Government by notification in the Official Gazette.”

17.

In the instant case, admittedly above provisions of Section 25F are not complied with. The workman concerned,

WW-01 has denied in her deposition that any amount was paid to her at the time of her termination. Three months’ salary

was credited to her bank account only after two months of her termination. MW-01 has stated in cross-examination that

Mrs. Mahua Ghosh was given three months’ notice pay, but in addition to that neither any compensation was paid to her

nor any reason for her termination was mentioned in the notice. The termination letter filed as Annexure-2 to the

examination-in-chief of MW-01 also does not indicate that any amount of compensation or salary was paid to her or any

reason was given at the time of her termination. Contrary to it the termination letter mentions that final settlement will be

processed within two weeks from the date of termination which substantiates the statement of WW-01 that after two

months of her termination salary was credited to her bank account.

18.

In view of above, it is established that the provisions of Section 25F of the Act of 1947 were not complied with

before her termination which renders her termination illegal. Therefore, she is entitled for reinstatement.

19.

So far as back wages is concerned, the workman has nowhere stated in her statement of claim or in her

deposition that after her termination she was not working for gain which was incumbent upon her to mention. In

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7163

Hindustan Tin Works Ltd. v. Its employees, 1978-II-LLJ 474 Hon’ble the Apex Court has held that ordinarily

workman whose service has been illegally terminated would be entitled to full back wages except to the extent he was

gainfully employed during the forced idleness. This was normal rule and the party objecting to it must establish the

circumstances necessitating departure. But the concept of granting back wages has undergone sea change. In the case of

Allahabad Jal Sansthan v. Daya Shankar Rai, 2005 (5) SCC 124 the Hon’ble Apex Court has held

“……… Earlier in the event of an order of dismissal being set aside, reinstatement with full back wages was the

usual result. But, now with the passage of time it came to be realized that the industry is being compelled to pay

the workman for a period during he had apparently contributed little or nothing at all, for a period that was

spent unproductively, while the workman is being compelled to go back to a situation prevailed many years ago

when he was dismissed. It is necessary for us to develop a pragmatic approach to problem dogging industrial

relation.”

In the case of Allahabad Jal Sansthan (supra) the respondent had not raised any plea in his written statement that he had

been sitting idle or had not obtained any other employment in interregnum. On the question being raised by the employer

for non-entitlement of back wages on this ground, the Hon’ble Apex Court observed as below:

“The learned counsel for the appellant, in our opinion, is correct in submitting that pleading to that effect in the

written statement of the workman was necessary. Not only no such pleading was raised, even in his evidence

the workman did not say that he was continued to remain unemployed.”

20.

Similarly in UP State Brassware Corporation Ltd. v. Uday Narain Pandey, (2006) 1 SCC 479 the Hon’ble

Supreme Apex Court has again reiterated the above legal proposition –

“61.

It is not in dispute that the Respondent did not raise any plea in his written statement that he was not

gainfully employed during the said period. It is now well settled by various decisions of this Court that

although earlier this Court insisted thatit was for the employer to raise the aforementioned plea, but having

regard to provisions of Section 106 of the Evidence Act or the provisions analogous thereto, such plea should be

raised by the workman.”

21.

Thus, to claim back wages, it was necessary for the concerned workman to have pleaded in his statement of

claim that he remained unemployed during the period of his dismissal and he should have also adduced evidence to that

effect. But, there is no such pleading in the statement of claim of the workman concerned, nor there is any evidence on

this point. Thus she is not entitled for full back wages. However, keeping in view the circumstances of the case, I think it

just and proper to award her one time lumpsum compensation of Rupees three lakh instead of full back wages.

22.

In view of what has been stated above, the workman under reference is entitled for reinstatement in service with

lumpsum back wages of Rupees three lakh.

23.

Reference is answered accordingly.

Justice RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer

Dated, Kolkata,

The 12^th September, 2019

नई द ली, 1 अ1 तूबर, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 1820

1820

1820—औ\ोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) क धारा 17 के अनुसरण म के3!ीय सरकार

मेसस, िह3 दु" तान पेbोिलयम काप’रेशन िलिमटेड के -बंधतंO के संब‡ िनयोजक और उनके कम,कार के बीच अनुबंध म

िनDद] औ\ोिगक िववाद म के3!ीय सरकार औ\ोिगक अिधकरण एवं $म 3यायालय, कोलकाता के पंचाट (संदभ, सं6या

16/2018) को -कािशत करती है जो के3!ीय सरकार को 26.09.2019 को -ाZ &आ था।

[सं. एल-30011/30/2018-आईआर (एम)]

डी. के. िहमांशु, अवर सिचव

7164

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 1^st October, 2019

S.O. 1820.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 16/2018) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Kolkata now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 26.09.2019.

[No. L-30011/30/2018-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA

Reference No. 16 of 2018

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Indian M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

AND

Their workmen

Present: Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra, Presiding Officer

Appearance:

On behalf of the Management

Mr. D.K. Kundu, learned counsel with Mr. A.K. Kundu,

learned counsel and Mr. A. Basu, learned counsel.

On behalf of the Workmen

None

State: West Bengal.

Industry: Petroleum.

Dated: 17^th September, 2019

AWARD

By Order No.L-30011/30/2018-IR(M) dated 25.10.2018 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in

exercise of its powers under Section 10(1)(d) and (2A) referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

“Whether the alleged demand of Kolkata Jilla Security and allied services Workmen’s Union, Kolkata vide

letter dated 25.3.2014 to the management of H.P.C.L., Kolkata to Security Armed Guard and Supervisors

through their Service Provider for the receipt of legal facilities like Bonus, Holiday Leave, Overtime, Field

allowance etc. and remuneration is proper, legal and justified? If so, what relief the workmen (Security Armed

Guard and Supervisors) are entitled to? What directions, if any, are necessary in the matter?”

When the case was taken up for hearing today, none appeared for the union, though the management was

represented by its learned counsel. It transpires from record that though this reference is pending in this Tribunal since

09.11.2018 and inspite of opportunities, neither the union has ever appeared and filed its statement of claim, nor the

management filed its written statement to proceed further with the case.

On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the union has no grievance at present

in respect of its alleged demand as mentioned in the order of reference. Therefore, there exists no dispute for

adjudication.

Therefore, the reference is disposed of accordingly.

Justice RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer

Dated, Kolkata,

The 17^th September, 2019

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7165

नई द ली, 1 अ1 तूबर, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 1821.

1821.

1821.—औ\ोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) क धारा 17 के अनुसरण म के3!ीय सरकार

मेसस, " टील अथॉWर टी ऑफ इिwडया िलिमटेड के -बंधतंO के संब‡ िनयोजक और उनके कम,कार के बीच अनुबंध म िनDद]

औ\ोिगक िववाद म के3!ीय सरकार औ\ोिगक अिधकरण एवं $म 3यायालय, कोलकाता के पंचाट (संदभ, सं6या 21/2018)

को -कािशत करती है जो के3!ीय सरकार को 26.09.2019 को -ाZ &आ था।

[सं. एल-26011/9/2018-आईआर (एम)]

डी. के. िहमांशु, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1^st October, 2019

S.O. 1821.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 21/2018) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Kolkata now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. Steel Authority of India Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central

Government on 26.09.2019.

[No. L-26011/9/2018-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA

Reference No. 21 of 2018

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Indian M/s. Steel Authority of India Limited

AND

Their workmen

Present: Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra, Presiding Officer

Appearance:

On behalf of the Management

None

On behalf of the Workmen

None.

State: West Bengal.

Industry: Steel

Dated: 19^th September, 2019

AWARD

By Order No.L-26011/9/2018-IR(M) dated 29.11.2018 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise

of its powers under Section 10(1)(d) and (2A) referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

“Whether the demand of Indian National Trade Union Congress (INTUC) (the faction led by Shri Chandra

Shekhar Dubey as President) for not allowing one faction of INTUC in National Joint Committee for steel

sector (NJCS) in the line of coal industry decision on JBCCI vide letter dated 11.01.2017, is genuine, justified

and legal? If so, what relief the union concerned is entitled to?”

When the case was taken up today for hearing, none was responding calls for the parties. It transpires from

record that though this reference is pending in this Tribunal since 17.12.2018 and inspite of opportunities, neither the

union, nor the management has ever appeared before this Tribunal to proceed further in this reference.

7166

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the union has no grievance at present

in respect of its alleged demand as mentioned in the order of reference. Therefore, there exists no dispute for

adjudication.

Therefore, the reference is disposed of accordingly.

Justice RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer

Dated, Kolkata,

The 19^th September, 2019

नई द ली, 1 अ1 तूबर, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 1822.

1822.

1822.—औ\ोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) क धारा 17 के अनुसरण म के3!ीय सरकार

मेसस, बगलकोट सीमट एंड इंड"bीज िलिमटेड के -बंधतंO के संब‡ िनयोजक और उनके कम,कार के बीच अनुबंध म िनDद]

औ\ोिगक िववाद म के3!ीय सरकार औ\ोिगक अिधकरण एवं $म 3यायालय, बगलूर के पंचाट (संदभ, सं6या 24/2014) को

-कािशत करती है जो के3!ीय सरकार को 25.09.2019 को -ाZ &आ था।

[सं. एल- 29011/8/2014-आईआर (एम)]

डी. के. िहमांशु, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1^st October, 2019

S.O. 1822.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 24/2014) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court, Bangalore now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management

M/s. Bagalkot Cement and Industries Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on

25.09.2019.

[No. L-29011/8/2014-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIUBNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

BANGALORE

DATED

13^th SEPTEMBER 2019

PRESENT

JUSTICE SMT. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

C R No.24/2014

I Party

II Party

The General Secretary,

Bagalkot Cement Company Worker’s Union, R O

Kamgar Sadan, Mucchandi Cross,

BAGALKOT – 587 101.

The Managing Director,

M/s. Bagalkot Cement and Industries Limited,

BAGALKOT – 587 101.

Appearances :

I Party :

Sh. M H Bhat, Advocate

II Party :

Sh.N M Hansi, Advocate

The Government of India, Ministry of Labourvide order No. L-29011/8/2014 – IR(M) dated 09.02.2014 in

exercise of the power conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7167

Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred as “The Act”) (14 of 1947) referred the following Industrial Dispute to this

Tribunal for adjudication:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of management of Bagalkot Cement is just and fair in deducting ESI contribution

from its nine workers, by transferring their services from mine to cement factory. If not, to what relief the

said workmen are entitled to?”

Subsequent to reference of the case notice was issued to both the parties. Though vakalath was filed for both

sides, thereafter they remained absent. The 1st Party though served has not appeared to persue their claim.

In the circumstance, it is inevitable to hold that the 2^nd Party failed to justify their action. At the same time the 1^st

Party workmen since did not put forth their claim they are not entitled for any relief.

AWARD

Reference is Rejected

(Dictated to U D C, transcribed by him, corrected and signed by me on 13^th September 2019)

Justice Smt. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

नई द ली, 1 अ1 तूबर, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 1823.

1823.

1823.—औ\ोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) क धारा 17 के अनुसरण म के3!ीय सरकार

मेसस, ओ०एन०जी०सी० िलिमटेड एवं अ3 य के -बंधतंO के संब‡ िनयोजक और उनके कम,कार के बीच अनुबंध म िनDद]

औ\ोिगक िववाद म के3!ीय सरकार औ\ोिगक अिधकरण एवं $म 3यायालय-1, नई द ली के पंचाट

(संदभ, सं6या 45/2019) को -कािशत करती है जो के3!ीय सरकार को 25.09.2019 को -ाZ &आ था।

[सं. एल-30011/9/2018-आईआर (एम)]

डी. के. िहमांशु, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1^st October, 2019

S.O. 1823.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 45/2019) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court-1, New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. O.N.G.C. Limited and other and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on

25.09.2019.

[No. L-30011/9/2018-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR

COURT No.1, DELHI

ID No. 45/2019

The General Secretary,

ONGC Contract Employees Union,

15, Sewak Ashram Road,

Dehradun – 248001

…Workman

Versus

(i)

The Deputy General Manager (Security),

M/s. ONGC Ltd., Tel Bhawan,

Dehradun – 248 003

7168

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(ii)

The Managing Director,

M/s. Uttrakhand Purv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Ltd.,

Station Sub Area Canteen Complex,

Garhi Cantt., Dehradun – 248 003

…Managements

AWARD

A reference under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947(in short the Act) was received from the Central Government, Ministry of Labour and Employment for

adjudication vide letter No.L-30011/9/2018-IR(M) dated 31.10.2018 for adjudication of an industrial dispute with the

following terms:

‘Whether the action of the management of M/s ONGC Limited, Dehradun in directing the M/s Uttarakhand

Purva Sainik Kalyan Nigam Limited, Dehradun (contractor) for compliance of Directorate General Resettlement

(DGR) guidelines which resulted in ousting 24 contract labours (security guards) is legal and justified. If not, to

what relief the workmen are entitled to?’

On receipt of the above reference, notice was sent to the workman union as well as the managements, calling

upon the workman union to file their statement of claim. However, Shri Anil Kumar, General Secretary of the workman

approached the Tribunal on the date fixed, i.e. 16.09.2019 and filed letter dated 16.09.2019 Ex.C-1, averring therein that

the claimant union alongwith the principal employers ONGC and M/s Uttarakhand Purva Sainik Kalyan Nigam Limited,

Dehradun (contractor) have in principle accepted the Fair Wage package for contract workers deployed by the

employers/contractors in the establishment of ONGC. The Fair Wage policy provides for higher than minimum wages,

statutory benefits, insurance benefits and social security to the contract workers deployed in the establishment of ONGC.

The workmen connected in the dispute have executed affidavits cum declaration that they do not desire to proceed further

with the reference.

Statement of Shri Anil Kumar, General Secretary of the workman union and Col. S.C.S. Bhandari, Chief Project

Officer, Uttrakhand Purv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Ltd. were recorded separately. In view of Ex-C-1 and the statements of

the above witnesses, there remains no grievance between the parties. The claim now stands settled. Ex.C-1 shall form

integral part of the Award. An award is accordingly passed. Let this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as

required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for publication.

PRANITA MOHANTY, Presiding Officer

Dated : September 18, 2019

नई द ली, 1 अ1 तूबर, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 1824.

1824.

1824.—औ\ोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) क धारा 17 के अनुसरण म के3!ीय सरकार

मेसस, इिwडयन ऑयल काप’रेशन िलिमटेड के -बंधतंO के संब‡ िनयोजक और उनके कम,कार के बीच अनुबंध म िनDद]

औ\ोिगक िववाद म के3!ीय सरकार औ\ोिगक अिधकरण एवं $म 3यायालय-2, चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट (संदभ, सं6या 38/2009)

को -कािशत करती है जो के3!ीय सरकार को 25.09.2019 को -ाZ &आ था।

[सं. एल-30012/37/2009-आईआर (एम)]

डी. के. िहमांशु, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 1^st October, 2019

S.O. 1824.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 38/2009) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour

Court-2, Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the

management of M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central Government

on 25.09.2019.

[No. L-30012/37/2009-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7169

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II, CHANDIGARH

Present: Sh. A.K. Singh, Presiding Officer

ID No. 38/2009

Registered on:-22.03.2010

Sh. Rakesh Kumar, S/o Sh. S.N. Sharma, R/o H.No.166/3, Bhagwati Nagar, Ext. Jammu.

…Workman

Versus

Divisional Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., DO22-O/B, J.D.A. Commercial Complex. Rail Head, Jammu

Managing Director, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Plot No.3-A, Sector 19-A, Chandigarh.

Chairman, Indian Oil Bhawan, G-9, Ali Yavar Jung Marg, Bandra(East) Mumbai-400051. …Respondents

AWARD

Passed on:-02.08.2019

Central Government vide Notification No. L-30012/37/2009-IR(M) Dated 12.03.2010, under clause (d) of sub-

section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(hereinafter called the Act), has

referred the following Industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:-

“Whether the action of the management of Indian Oil Corporation Limited in terminating the services of

Shri Rakesh Kumar S/o Sh. S.N. Sharma, R/o 166/3, Bhagwati Nagar, Extn. Jammu, w.e.f. 26.05.2006 is

justified and legal? To what relief the workman is entitled and from which date?”

Both the parties were served with notices. The workman/claimant filed his statement of claim with the

averment that he had joined the services of the respondent-corporation on 01.07.2004 on monthly salary of Rs.3,000/-

and worked till 26.05.2006 without any interruption. Claimant attended different petrol pumps and for the purpose

management had issued the office Punch Card No.60792 and his attendance was marked regularly. The Divisional

Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., respondent no.1 had all of sudden told the workman not to resume his duties from

26.05.2006 and ousted from the job without any reason. Workman/claimant requested the respondent no.1 to allow to

work in the office but adopting unfair labour practice, terminated his services without giving any notice and violating the

provision of the Industrial Disputes Act which is unjustified in the eye of law. The petition filed for adjudication before

the conciliation officer was withdrawn by the claimant on the basis of assurance given by the management that he would

be reinstated into the service but, management did not allow to resume his services and again defrauded and cheated for

his no fault. After giving legal notice for the statutory period, claimant has approached to this Hon’ble Court for

adjudication of his grievances. The workman is totally unemployed since the date of retrenchment/termination of his

services by the management as such, he is entitled to be reinstated in service with full back wages along with continuity

of service with all consequential benefits attached with the post.

The respondent-corporation has filed its written statement, alleging therein that claimant/workman was never

employed by the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. The respondent-corporation being a public sector undertaking employ

persons in accordance with the recruitment rules/regulations/policies etc. of the corporation and as such, workman was

never selected, recruited and appointed by the respondent-corporation. In fact, respondent-corporation is engaged in the

production, refining and marketing of petroleum products through various refineries, depots, terminals, plants and

administrative officer, area officer at various places all over India. All the primary and main jobs are being maintained

by the regular employees of the respondent-corporation and certain incidental jobs at the aforesaid divisional office like

maintenance, checking of delivery units at retail outlets, haulage operations such as gardening, housekeeping,

loading/unloading, outdoor jobs, grass cutting, binding of challans and transport bills, electrical maintenance and other

miscellaneous jobs, which are not regular in nature, are being carried out through contractors. It is pertinent to mention

that the contract is awarded to the contractor by the respondent-corporation for the jobs on contractual basis in respect of

number of jobs to be engaged by the contractors. The payment to the contractors are made as per the bill submitted by

them and corporation ensures the payment of wages to the labourers by the contractor under the labour laws from time to

time. The factum of withdrawal of the conciliation proceeding before the labour commissioner, Jammu, has been denied

by the management on the assurance of reemployment by the management to the workman. It is stated that there was no

employer-employee or master and servant relationship between the respondent-corporation and the claimant/applicant

and as such, the reference made is ultravires and is liable to be rejected by the Hon’ble Court. Management has further

7170

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

alleged that claimant is not fall within the definition of ‘workman’ as he was contractor/worker and he himself used to do

work of checking and maintenance of delivery units at retail outlets and was being paid by the respondent-corporation on

the basis of bills submitted by him for the works done. The periodicity of payments made to him by the respondent-

corporation would clearly establish the fact that he was not getting the salary amounting Rs.3,000/- as is alleged by the

workman. It is prayed by the respondent-corporation that applicant/claimant is not entitled to any relief of reinstatement,

back wages etc. in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and the reference is devoid of merit and is liable to be

dismissed.

Both the parties were given opportunities to lead evidence. Workman, Rakesh Kumar, has submitted his

affidavit Ex.A-1 and has proved the documents Ex.P-1 to P-19 filed along with his affidavit. This witness has accepted

in his cross-examination that he was neither interviewed nor appointment letter was issued to him by the management.

He has stated that he was looking after the maintenance job of dispensing units and retail outlets but denied that he was

not getting salary. He has accepted that bill Ex.M-1 to M-18 bears his signature and submitted by him. He has further

stated that he was used to sent at the retail outlets by the engineering-department officers Sunil Kumar and Chetan

Patwari. He has further stated that his PF was not deducted and no PF number was given by the management.

Respondent-corporation has submitted affidavit Ex.R-1 of Chetan Patwari, Area Manager, Indian Oil

Corporation Ltd., along with documents Ex.M-1 to M-18. During the course of cross-examination, this witness has stated

that he had joined the management in August, 1999 as officer and an agreement is always executed between the

contractor and management in writing and without signing of agreement no work can be assigned to the contractor. He

has also accepted that contractor has no role in the official meeting of management. This witness has also accepted that

cheques Ex.P-1 to P-16 was issued by the corporation against the bill submitted by the claimant Rakesh Kumar and

punch card was issued to the employees as well as non-employees of the corporation. Thus, this witness has categorically

stated that the agreement is executed between the corporation and contractor in writing and without signing of agreement

works were not assigned to any contractors.

I have heard Sh. J.S. Rangi, Ld. Counsel for the workman and Sh. Paul S. Saini, Ld. Counsel for the

management and perused the record carefully.

Learned counsel of the workman has submitted that he has joined the respondent-corporation on 01.07.2004 as

worker and served in this capacity for time being and on being satisfied with the work of the workman, he was assigned

the work of office job boy(SDRSM) till his retrenchment/termination on 26.04.2006. Learned counsel further contended

that workman was neither contractor nor any agreement is executed with the respondent-corporation by the

claimant/workman. Learned counsel of the workman vehemently argued that services of the workman was terminated in

utter violation of Section 25-F of the Act without giving any notice and one month salary in lieu of notice. It is further

argued that to avoid the provident fund, gratuity and other benefits accruing to the claimant, respondent-corporation has

adopted noval method for taking a bill signed by the workman against the payment of salary. Learned counsel for the

workman has further contended that workman was under the control of management and was paid salary through

cheques by the management as such, there existed relationship of employer and employee, master and servant. Learned

counsel has placed reliance in the case of Dharangadhara Chemicals Works Ltd. Vs. State of Saurashtra, AIR 1957,

Supreme Court page 264, Ram Singh and others Vs. Union Territory Chandigarh and Oths., Civil Appeal

No.3166/2002, decided on 07.11.2003 and in Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Oths.(2007) 1,

Supreme Court cases, page 630, which deals with the relationship between employer and employee/master and servant

and forum for deciding nature of employment of workman with establishment and contractors.

Per contra, learned counsel of the respondent-corporation vehemently argued that claimant is neither

workman nor appointed by the respondent-corporation for the work of corporation since 01.07.2004. It is also contended

that there was no relationship of employer and employee/master and servant between the workman and management as

such, respondent-corporation has no liability towards the claimant/workman. Learned counsel further argued that being

the contractor, his services were taken by the respondent-corporation against the maintenance bill, and payment were

made to the claimant as such, he was not a salaried employee of the respondent-corporation. Hence, question of issuing

notice or payment of one month salary was not required as per law.

There is no dispute about preposition of law that onus to prove that claimant was in the employment of

management is always on the workman/claimant and it is for the workman to adduce evidence to prove factum of his

employment with the management. Such evidence may be in form of receipt of salary or wages for 240 days or record of

his/her appointment or engagement for that year to show that he worked with the employer for 240 days or more in a

calendar year. In this regard reference may be made to Batala Coop. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Sowaran Singh, (2005) 8

Supreme Court Cases 481 as well as Director Fisheries Terminated Division Vs. Bhikubhai Mehgajibhai Gavda

(2012) 1 SCC 47.

There is hardly any dispute with the preposition of law as propounded in the aforesaid case. However, the

factual scenario in the present case is bit different, inasmuch as the management in its written statement has clearly

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7171

admitted the factum of employment of the claimant inasmuch as it has been stated that the claimant was engaged as a

contractor/worker by the respondent-corporation in the month of July 2004 and paid for maintenance bill submitted by

claimant against the bill accordingly. As such, it clearly establishes relationship of employer-employee between the

management and claimant. In this regard, reference can be made to the decision in the case of Devinder Singh Vs.

Municipal Council, Sanaur, AIR 2011 Supreme Court 2532, wherein, the Hon’ble Apex Court while interpreting the

provisions of Section 2(S) of the Act which deals with the definition of “workman” has observed as follows:-

“The source of employment, the quantum of recruitment, the terms & conditions of employment/ contract of

service, the quantum of wages/ pay and mode of payment are not at all relevant for deciding whether or not a

person is a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Act. The definition of workman also does not

make any distinction between full time and part time employee or a person appointed on contract basis.

There is nothing in the plain language of Section 2(s) from which it can be inferred that only person

employed on regular basis or a person employed for doing whole time job is a workman and the one

employed on temporary, part time or contract basis on fixed wages or as a casual employee or for doing duty

for fixed hours is not a workman.”

Thus Hon’ble Supreme Court has clarified that the definition of workmen also does not make any distinction

between full time or part time employee or a person appointed on contract basis. There is nothing in plain language of

Section 2(S) from which it can be infer that only person employed on regular basis or a person employed for doing

whole time job is a workman and the one employed on temporary, part time or contract basis on fixed wages or as a

casual employee or for doing duty for fixed hours is not a workman. In view of the ratio of law enunciated in the above

ruling, in my considered opinion the claimant herein admittedly falls within the definition of ‘workman’ under Section

2(S) of the Act.

10.

The question which is relevant for consideration is the status of claimant as per assertion of the management.

The management has asserted in Para 7 of written statement that claimant Rakesh Kumar himself was the

contractor/worker who used to do the job against the contract awarded to him by the respondent-corporation. It appears

that management wants to say that in fact claimant was awarded contract which is performed by himself and not by the

labours engaged by him. The term contractor has been defined in Section (2)(1)(c) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

as a person who undertakes to produce a given result for the establishment other than a mere supply of goods or articles

of manufacture to such establishment through contract labour or who supplies contract labour for any work of the

establishment and includes sub-contractor. Thus, it is very much clear from above definition that contractor and labour

does not be same person at the same time for the work of establishment taken under the contract.

11.

Learned counsel of the management argued that oral contract was awarded to the claimant for the work of

maintenance against which workman has submitted his bills and payment is made by the respondent-corporation

accordingly. In fact, there is no specific averment in written statement about the nature of agreement and terms &

conditions of contract nature of work assured(if) any to the claimant which is paramount consideration or

agreement/contract between two parties. Contrary to this, witness Chetan Patwari, Area Manager, who has filed his

affidavit in evidence as Ex.R-1 on behalf of the management has not stated anything about the nature of contract (oral or

written), terms & conditions of contract or time period of contract with the claimant in his affidavit. But he has accepted

during the cross-examination by the workman-counsel that an agreement was executed with the contractor by the

corporation while awarding the contract and without signing the agreement, no work can be assigned to the contractor.’

Contractor has no role in the meeting of management. Thus, it is clear that without written agreement no work could be

assigned to any contractor by the management. The statement of the witness appears to be reliable and true looking the

nature and constitution of the management being a Public Sector Undertaking. Hence, this Tribunal is of the considered

opinion that, management has utterly failed to prove that claimant was engaged as contractor by the management without

any licence or documents required under Contract Labour Act, 1960.

12.

Learned counsel of workman/claimant has contended that claimant was an employee of the

corporation/management and was paid salary for his services rendered to the management since his employment. The

fact regarding the payment of salary by the respondent-corporation has been specifically pleaded and mentioned in the

claim petition as well as affidavit filed by the workman in his evidence. He has alleged that he was appointed as worker

initially and subsequently Office Job Boy(SDRSM) by virtue of his performance in the establishment having punch card

no.60792 to his credit. The affidavit in the form of evidence as submitted by the workman is in the line of the facts

alleged in the claim statement. Learned counsel of the workman has drawn my attention towards documents P-1 to P-15,

which is a Photostat copies of cheques issued by the respondent-corporation in the name of Rakesh Kumar. Learned

counsel for the workman contended that this was salary which was paid by the management to the workman by taking a

bill for the purpose. Contrary to this, learned counsel of the management has drawn my attention towards the documents

Ex.M-1 to M-16, which is in the form of bills signed by the claimant/workman, alleging therein the maintenance work

done by him. Perusal of bill reveals that mostly the bills relates to Rs.3,000/- only, executed on different dates. Natural

question arises as whether this is the bill regarding the maintenance as is mentioned in Ex.M-1 to M-16 or it is a salary

7172

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

given by the respondent-corporation to the claimant/workman. Learned counsel of the workman has drawn my attention

towards the Ex.M-10, M-12, M-13 and M-14, which relates to the office work and interviews conducted by the

respondent-corporation with the assistance of the workman/claimant in interview as a Coordinator for the staff work etc.

from1st to 6^th August. Ex.M-12 further clarify that claimant was engaged as interview coordinator for 6 days at the rate

of Rs.150/- per day and mobile bill at the rate of Rs.200/-. These bills are related with the date 07.07.2005, 31.07.2005,

31.08.2005, 30.09.2005 and 31.12.2005. Further question arises that if the claimant was in fact a contractor then how he

was engaged as interview coordinator for such a long time and he worked as co-ordinator for the interview conducted by

the corporation as is evident from the photograph Ex.P-17 in which claimant/workman was marked by red circle. It is

pertinent to mention that learned counsel of the management has not asked any question during the course of cross-

examination from the claimant on these documents which are such a relevant papers to find out the actual nature of work

performed by the workman during his tenure as an employee of the respondent-corporation. Thus, it can be safely

inferred that workman had worked as office-boy and directly paid by the respondent-corporation throughout his

employment as such.

13. The facts and evidence of case, in hand, reveal that claimant/applicant was directly under the direction and

control of the respondent-corporation being the employer as his salary was paid by the respondent-corporation and it has

right to regulate his employment. This observation finds support with the documents mentioned above relating to

engagement of claimant/applicant as a interview coordinator for the interview conducted by the respondent-corporation

on different dates and in different months. This belie the stand taken by the management that claimant was contractor

and accordingly paid for maintenance work done by him under contract. It is beyond imagination that management has

right to award a contract to a person orally as is alleged by the management. Hence, this Tribunal is of the opinion that

though, claimant was paid always against the bills submitted by the claimant to the tune of Rs.3,000/- or Rs.3100/- only

for relevant months in order to avoid the liability towards workman under Industrial Disputes Act, Employees Provident

Fund Act.

14. So far as the question which arises for consideration is whether the workman has completed 240 days in

preceding year before his termination for compliance of Provision of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Management has neither in his written statement nor in the affidavit of Chetan Patwari, Area Manager, has specifically

denied that claimant/applicant had not performed his duties from 01.07.2004 to 26.05.2019. Similarly, management has

not filed any other evidence to prove that claimant/applicant did not worked for 240 days on preceding year of his

alleged termination. So, vital question arises for consideration is whether termination of the claimant from his services

by the respondent-corporation from 26.05.2006 is in accordance with the law or in violation of the provisions of Section

25-F of the Act. According to the learned counsel of the workman, he was assigned the work of Office Job

Boy(SDRSM) due to his sincere service and performance assessed by the management. He has also alleged in his claim

statement as well as affidavit filed as evidence Ex.A-1 that after termination, he approached to the respondent-

corporation for reinstatement as work was available with the respondent-corporation but all in vain. It is neither the case

of the management that any notice or compensation in lieu of notice period was given to the claimant prior to termination

of his services w.e.f. 26.05.2006, nor any such evidence has been adduced on record by the management. Contrary to

this, management has asserted that there did not exists relationship of employer-employee or master and servant as such,

one month notice or compensation, in lieu of notice is not required but this fact could not be proved by the management

on the basis of the evidence produced before this Tribunal. In these circumstances, this Tribunal has no hesitation to hold

that the services of the workman/claimant were terminated by the management from 26.05.2006 in violation of Section

25-F of the ID Act, 1947.

15. There is long line of decisions of Hon’ble Apex Court as well as of various High Courts that provisions of

Section 25-F of the Act are mandatory in nature and termination of the workman from services in derogation of the

provisions of Section 25-F of the Act will render action of the management to be illegal and void under the law. Since

there is no evidence on record that any valid notice was issued by the management to the workman at the time of

termination or in lieu of such notice, any compensation was paid to him as such, action of the management in terminating

the services of the workman is held to be illegal and void.

16. Now the residual question for consideration is whether the claimant/workman is entitled to any incidental relief of

payment or back wages and/or reinstatement of service with full back wages. It is proved on record that

claimant/workman was continuously in the employment of the management from 01.07.2004 to 26.05.2006 on regular

basis. There is no show cause notice or memo issued to the claimant/workman by the management. Moreover, the job of

the workman is of perennial and regular nature though, he was not appointed on the basis of advertisement, written

examination or interview whatsoever as per rule. Thus, he has worked with the respondent-corporation almost 22 months

regularly. Though, the workman/claimant has pleaded that he is unemployed from the date of his termination but this fact

is not proved by the claimant through affidavit filed as evidence meaning thereby he is doing some intermittent job or

gainfully employed to make livelihood for himself or his family.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7173

17. The Hon’ble Apex Court in case “Deepali Gundu Surwase Vs. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya”

reported as (2013) 10 SCC 324 has held as under:

“The propositions which can be culled out from the aforementioned judgments are:

“i)

In case of wrongful termination of service, reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages

is the normal rule.

ii)

Ordinarily, an employee or workman whose services are terminated and who is desirous of getting

back wages is required to either plead or at least make a statement before the adjudicating authority

or the Court of first instance that he was not gainfully employed or was employed on lesser wages. If

the employer wants to avoid payment of full back wages, then I has to plead and also lead cogent

evidence to prove that the workman wads gainfully employed and was getting wages equal to the

wages he wads drawing prior to the termination of service. This is so because it is settled law that the

burden of proof of the existence of a particular fact lies on the person who makes a positive

averments about its existence. It is always easier to prove a positive fact than to prove a negative

fact. Therefore, once the employee shows that he was not employed, the onus lies on the employer to

specifically plead and prove that the employee was gainfully employed and was getting the same or

substantially similar emoluments.”

18. The Hon’ble Apex Court also held that different expressions are used for describing the consequence of

termination of a workman’s service/employment/engagement by way of retrenchment without complying with the

mandate of Section 25-F of the Act. Sometimes it has been termed as ab initio void, sometimes as illegal per se,

sometime as nullity and sometimes as non est. Leaving aside the legal semantics, we have no hesitation to hold that

termination of service of an employee by way of retrenchment without complying with the requirement of giving one

month’s notice or pay in lieu thereof and compensation in terms of Section 25-F (a) and (b) has the effect of rendering

the action of the employer and nullity and the employee is entitled to continue in employment as if his service was not

terminated. (Anoop Sharma Vs. Executive Engineer, Public Health Division No.1 Panipat (2010) 5 SCC 497).

19.

A Bench of three Judges of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Hindustan Tin Works Private Limited

vs. Employees of Hindustan tin Works Private Limited (1979) 2 SCC 80, held that relief of reinstatement with

continuity of service can be granted where termination of service is found to be invalid. It would mean that the employer

has taken away illegally the right to work of the workman contrary to the relevant law or in breach of contract and

simultaneously deprived the workman of his earnings. If thus the act of employer is found to be totally illegal and

arbitrary, in that eventuality the workman is required to be reinstated, with full back wages. Plain common sense also

dictates that the removal of an order terminating the services of workman must ordinarily lead to the reinstatement of the

services of the workman along with payment of back wages.

20.

However, Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of General Manager, Haryana Roadways Vs. Rudan Singh,

reported as 2005 SCC (L & S) 716 observed as under:-

“8. There is no rule of thumb that in every case where the Industrial Tribunal gives a finding that the termination of

service was in violation of Section 25-F of the Act, entire back wages should be awarded. A host of factors like the

manner and method of selection and appointment i.e. whether after proper advertisement of the vacancy or inviting

applications from the employment exchange, nature of appointment namely, whether ad hoc, short term, daily wage,

temporary or permanent in character, any special qualification required for the job and the like should be weighed and

balanced in taking a decision regarding award of back wages. One of the important factors which has to be taken into

consideration is the length of service, which the workman had rendered with the employer. If the workman has

rendered a considerable period of service and his services are wrongfully terminated, he may be awarded full or

partial back wages keeping in view the fact that at this age and the qualification possessed by him he may not be in a

position to get another employment. However, where the total length of service rendered by a workman is very small,

the award of back wages for the complete period i.e. from the date of termination till the date of the award, which our

experience shows is often quite large, would be wholly inappropriate. A regular service of permanent character cannot

be compared to short or intermittent daily wage employment though it may be for 240 days in a calendar year.”

21. Yet, in another latest judgment i.e. District Development Officer Vs. Kanti Lal 2018 LLR 225 while

considering the question of reinstatement along with back wages of a daily wager, who have put two and a half years of

service, the Hon’ble Apex Court granted a lump sum compensation of Rs.2.50 lac in lieu of reinstatement. The workman

herein was not holding a regular post. Having regard to duration of service, it would be in the interest of justice and fair

7174

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

play if compensation of Rs.1,50,000/- be awarded as lump sum compensation to the workman. Accordingly, the

reference is answered by holding that action of the respondent-corporation in terminating the service of workman Rakesh

Kumar is illegal and an amount of Rs.1,50,000/- is ordered to be paid as lump sum compensation to the said workman by

the respondent-corporation and in case, this amount is not paid within one month from the date of publication of the

award, the workman shall be entitled to the said amount with 6% interest from the date of making of the reference till

realisation.

A. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 vDrwcj] 2019

dk-vk- 1825-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj dsujk

cSad ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] caxyksj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 138@2007½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

01-10-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12012@72@2007&vkbZ vkj ¼ch-II½]

lhek caly] vuqHkkx vfèkdkjh

New Delhi, the 1^st October, 2019

S.O. 1825.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 138/2007) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Canara Bank, and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on 01.10.2019.

[No. L-12012/72/2007-IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIUBNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

BANGALORE

DATED : 25^TH September 2019

PRESENT : Justice Smt. Ratnakala, Presiding Officer

CR No. 138/2007

I Party

II Party

Shri. Ganganarasimhaiah,

S/o Sh. Kambaiah, NES Extension,

Gandhinagar, Magadi Town,

Bangalore Rural District,

Bangalore – 562 120.

The General Manager (P),

Canara Bank,

112, J.C. Road,

BANGALORE – 560 002.

Appearance

Advocate for I Party : Mr. M. Rama Rao

Advocate for II Party : Mr. T.R.K. Prasad

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7175

AWARD

The Central Government vide Order No. L-12012/72/2007-IR(B-II) dated 08.10.2007 in exercise of the powers

conferred by Clause (d) of Sub-Section (1) and Sub-Section2(A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute act, 1947 (for

brevity ‘the Act’ hereafter) referred the following Industrial Dispute for adjudication.

“Whether the punishment of the compulsory retirement imposed on Shri. Ganganarasimahaiah by the

management of Canara Bank is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?”

The 1^st Party workman herein, joined the service of the 2^nd Party as Daily Wage Sub-Staff on 17.10.1990,

subsequently his service was confirmed as Duftery cum Cash Peon as Sub Staff Leader on 18.07.1992. While working

at V.G.Doddi, on 19.08.2004 he was kept under suspension on certain allegations, Charge Sheet dated 28.04.2005

followed. Domestic Enquiry was held on appointing the Enquiry Officer; the Enquiry Officer submitted his report

holding the workman guilty of the misconduct. The workman submitted his remarks to the enquiry report, the

Disciplinary Authority without considering his representation imposed the penalty of compulsory retirement w.e.f

15.03.2006.

The grievance of the 1^st Party as per his claim petition is, the allegations made against him are totally false and

without any basis; the enquiry was an empty formality without affording any reasonable opportunity to him. The Enquiry

report is without application of mind of Enquiry Officer, there was no evidence before the Enquiry Officer establishing

that he has committed the misconduct. The penalty imposed on him is harsh excessive and highly disproportionate. He

has a large and dependent family. Due to the order of illegal termination under the guise of Compulsory Retirement, his

family and himself are put to starvation and destitution.

The 2^nd Party in their Counter Statement justified their action. It was contented that the Domestic Enquiry was

conducted as per the provisions of Canara Bank Service Code which is in condolence with the Bipartite Settlement. The

finding of the Enquiry Officer is fair proper and reasoned; the Enquiry Officer had given all fair, reasonable and proper

opportunity to the 1^st Party. After analysing the finding of the Enquiry Officer and the submission made by the CSE to

the enquiry report and also the connected records the Disciplinary Authority concurred with the findings of the Enquiry

Officer; punishment of compulsory retirement was proposed to him, personal hearing was also given. Taking into

consideration of his submission during the personal hearing, so also the gravity of the misconduct and connected records,

in the circumstance of the case, the Disciplinary Authority agreed with the Enquiry Officer by holding him guilty of the

misconduct and imposed the punishment of compulsory retirement under xi Regulation iv Clause B of Canara Bank

Service Code of the 1^st Party. He challenged the orders of the Disciplinary Authority before the Appellate Authority and

the same was rejected by confirming the Punishment Order.

During the enquiry it was proved that, the 1^st Party has gained pecuniary benefits and tried to conceal the same by

making false entries. The records itself speak that he was the beneficiary under the transaction; such an act on the part of

the employment is grave.

Vide order dated 17.05.2013, the validity of the Domestic Enquiry held against the 1^st Party is upheld.

The 1^st Party workman has testified stating that, because of his active participation in the Workers Union of

which he is a member, he became an eye sore to the 2^nd Party, they wanted to send him out of employment; on false and

baseless allegations, he is thrown out of employment. It is a clear case of victimisation and unfair labour practice.

Further he has stated that along with his wife and parents he is virtually under starvation and destitution, none of the

family members are earning etc.

Written argument is submitted by the 1^st Party, Sh. TRKP for the 2^nd Party submitted his oral argument.

The allegation against the 1^st Party as per the Charge Sheet is,

On 03.04.2000, FGC 1/2000 for Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand Rupees Only) was granted to his Father

Sh. Kambaiah S/o Rangaiah, Nayakanapalya, Magadi Taluk,

On 01.03.2000, Sh. Robert Hoover the then Manager had allowed TOD for Rs.1,000/- (One Thousand Rupees

Only) in the SB A/c No. 519 of Sh. Kambaiah.

At the request of the 1^st Party on 24.03.2000 for further finance of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand Rupees

Only) in his father’s Account, Sh. R R Hoover prepared Debit and Credit Slips for Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand

Rupees Only) by debiting FGC A/s and Crediting SB A/c of Sh. Kambaiah. The 1^st Party had informed the Manager that

his father will be visiting the Branch for executing the Loan paper but he did not come to the Bank on that day. Hence,

Loan papers were not executed. The 1^st Party posted the Credit slips in SB 519 of Sh. Kambaiah and withdrew

Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand Rupees Only) from his SB A/c on the same day to set right the unauthorised debit.

7176

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

On 20.05.2000, he unauthorizedly debited from SB A/c 1550 of Sh. Rama Krishnaiah without the knowledge

of the Manager and without preparing any slips for debiting the Account and without showing any corresponding credit.

He debited the amount in Ledger sheet only and did not make any entry in the Subsidiary sheet.

He brought to the notice of the Manager about the unauthorised transaction on 31.03.2000. Subsequently,

Sh. R R Hoover passed the slips on that day by debiting SB A/c 1550 of Sh. Rama Krishnaiah and Crediting FGC

subsidiary without slips. By doing so the entry pertaining to FGC Loan granted in favour of Sh. Kambaiah on

24.03.2000 was reversed and the unauthorised debit in SB A/c 1550 of Sh. Rama Krishnaiah remained outstanding. To

set right the transaction of unauthorised debit in SB A/c 1550 and crediting FGC Head, Sh. R R Hoover hurriedly

sanctioned a Loan FGC 1/2000 for Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand Rupees Only) to Sh. Kambaiah on 03.04.2000

and duly obtained Loan papers from him by crediting the proceeds of SB 1550 Sh. Rama Krishnaiah. By re-crediting the

unauthorised debit, the 1^st Party has posted the debit slip pertaining to the transaction; unauthorizedly he made entries in

his father’s and Sh. Rama krishnaiah accounts.

Sh. Chennavenkataiah, PTE of the Branch had extracted the Balancing of Rs, 3,00,196/- (Three Lakhs One

Hundred and Ninety Six Rupees Only) before the debit of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand Rupees Only) on

25.03.2000 in SB Balancing book, the 1^st Party deliberately made alteration in the balancing book and altered the amount

to Rs. 2,75,196/- (Two Lakhs Seventy Five Thousand One Hundred and Ninety Six Rupees Only). He has admitted

having made these alterations in the SB Balancing Book; he has also made alterations in SB Control Registers and a

Closing Balance Subsidiary to tally the books which amounts to tampering and falsification of the Bank’s records. To

conceal the unauthorised debit in SB 1550 of Sh. Rama Krishnaiah, he deliberately left out the debit and credit entry

while updating his Pass Book. He has admitted having deliberately left out these entries in the Pass books. Sh. Rama

Krishnaiah having nothing to do with the transaction and the Manager granted Loan to accommodate the 1^st Party since,

he pressurised the Manager to grant the said Loan.

Sh. R R Hoover allowed DTS in SB account 2450 of Smt. Suvarnamma, who is the Wife of the 1^st Party on 8

occasions between 16.04.1999 to 23.05.2000 totalling to Rs.55,857/- (Fifty Five Thousand Eight Hundred and Fifty

Seven Rupees Only). That apart, she was granted with DPN RT 22/98, further Loans are granted to the 1^st Party and his

father under ALS 10/82 for Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand Rupees Only) and ALBL 98/2003 for Rs. 25,000/-

(Twenty Five Thousand Rupees Only) for which concurrence of the controlling office was not taken.

By his above action he has also caused wilful damage to the property of the Bank and its Customers. He has

controverted XI Regulation 2(a) of Canara Bank Service Code and committed a grave mistake. His action also being

prejudicial to the interest of the Bank, it amounts to grave misconduct within the meaning of Chapter xi Regulation 3

Clause M of the Canara Bank Service Code.

During the enquiry, two witnesses were examined for the Management and 19 documents were marked in his

evidence. The 1^st Party opted not to adduce evidence, however produced his Balancing Book as defence document, his

statement was recorded by the Enquiry Officer wherein, he has stated to the effect that, his statement was taken by the

Investigating Officer under threat. His statement is recorded as below

“……it is true I have done as per the instructions of Sh. Robert Hoover and I have not done anything by myself.

During the Investigation both Guruprasad and Sh. H. N. Ramesh have threatened me that the case would be

handed over to Police. Hence, with fear of Police and dictated by Sh. Ramesh……. I do not know English or

Kannada correctly…..”.

The two witnesses examined by the prosecution were the Investigating Officer and a Part time Employee of

V.G. Doddi Branch. Through MW-1/ Sh. H N Ramesh the Investigating Officer, his Investigating Report the statements

of the CSE and of the witnesses, the relevant SB Ledger Sheets, Debit Slip, Loan Ledger Sheet, SB Daily Control

marked as Ex Mex - 1 to Ex Mex - 16.

MW-2 is Part time employee, the statement given by him before the Investigating Officer was marked as

Ex Mex- 17. Wherein, he has stated to the affect at times as per the instruction of the Bank Manager he was taking out

balancing. On 31.03.2000, he has taken out the balance of Ledger No.2. He had taken the balance pertaining to SB A/c

1550 for Rs. 3,00,196/- but then it did not tally. He is not responsible for the correction carried over....

With the above evidence the Enquiry Officer proceeded to record his findings, accepting the entire story of the

prosecution. He records his finding, that CSE unauthorisedly made debit entries in the SB A/c 1550 for raising funds for

personal gains; he has coerced the Manager to sanction Loan to his family members for personal gain and has tampered

the Bank records by making alteration in SB Balancing Book to keep the records tally by fraudulent means on

account of unauthorised debits.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7177

Sh. TRKP for the 2^nd Party submits that because of the dearth in Staff’s strength, the Sub Staff used to be

assigned the work of entering the Bank Registers and the Bank has taken disciplinary action against Sh. Robert Hoover

the then Manager for his indulgence in the transactions.

On a perusal of the evidence placed before the Enquiry Officer, it is obvious that there was no evidence

pointing towards the CSE for causing entries in any of the Management documents exhibited. None of his colleagues

were brought before the Enquiry Officer to depose that he is the Author of the entries in the Management documents.

The statements of the witnesses recorded by the Investigating Officer do not serve by themselves as evidence. These

statements since not subjected for cross examination, they are not worth considering as evidentiary material. What is

established by the evidence of MW-2 is, Part time employee has also made entries in the record and the total pertaining

to SB A/c 1550 did not tally on 31.03.2000 and subsequently the entry is corrected by someone. He has never stated

having seen the 1^st Party handling the records of the Bank. The 1^st Party workman is a Sub Staff with the education

qualification of 7^th Standard. No attempt is made to procure expert opinion that, the disputed entries are authored by the

1^st Party workman. He has disputed the so called statement recorded by the Investigating Officer. Being a Sub Staff, it

is a wild imagination to say that he was in a dominant position to harass his Superior Officer/the Bank Manager to

sanction Loans by violating the procedure. Now it is submitted on his behalf that, all the Loan sanctioned in favour of

his father and wife are cleared. His father is living separately from him and his wife earns her own income. I am unable

to subscribe to this submission, if really that was the factuality; he ought to have examined his father and wife as his

witnesses during the enquiry. Subsequent to the adjudication of the Preliminary issue he has adduced evidence

contending that his Parent’s and wife are dependent on him. There is contradiction between his own evidence and

argument.

Let us peruse the charge segment wise,

though, his father Sh. Kambaiah was sanctioned Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand Rupees Only) Loan on

03.04.2000, the 1^st Party requested for further Loan of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand Rupees). Without executing

Loan papers, the 1^st Party posted the credit slips in the SB A/c 519 of Sh. Kambaiah and withdrew Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen

Thousand Rupees Only) from the said account on 24.03.2000, it is not shown that the entry in the SB A/c is made by the

1^st Party. In the usual course the entries in the SB A/c should have been authored by the concerned Clerk. If at all the 1^st

Party had made such entry the witness to speak in the record was either the Manager or the concerned Clerk. The cheque

leaf / withdrawal slip pertaining to Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand Rupees Only) is not produced.

On 25.03.2000 he unauthorisedly debited SB A/c 1550 of Sh. Rama Krishnaiah, the credit slip and debit slip of

25.03.2000 and daily control register are not produced. Again, it is not established that the relevant entry in SB A/c

statement / Mex-8 is that of 1^st Party workman.

he has not made corresponding entry in the subsidiary sheet – but that is not the duty of a Sub Staff.

the above transaction was brought to the notice of the Manager by the 1^st Party on 31.03.2000 on which the

Manager passed the slips on 31.03.2000 by debiting theSB A/c of Sh. Rama Krishna and debiting the FGC Subsidiary–

but same is not substantiated by the evidence.

That the debit slip was posted by him to Loan account Mex-12 of Sh. Kambaiah for his personal gain. It is not

proved that the 1^st Party is the Author of the entries in Ex Mex-12, though probably he might have enjoyed the Loan

amount sanctioned. He made alterations in the balancing book and deliberately made alterations to Rs. 2,75,196/- (Two

Lakhs Seventy Five Thousand One Hundred and Ninety Six Rupees Only) to tally the balance. He made alterations in

SB control registers, closing balance in the subsidiary ledger to tally the book – but SB control register, balancing book

and subsidiary ledger were not produced during the enquiry.

With a motive to conceal unauthorised debit in SB A/c of Sh. Rama Krishnaiah, the 1^st Party left out debit and

credit entry while updating the Passbook – not only that the 1^st Party has no authority to make entry in the Passbook but

also, it is not proved that he was the author of the entries in the passbook of Rama Krishna.

The TOD’s in the SB A/c of Smt. Suvarnamma was allowed and Loan granted to Sh. Kambaiah without concurrence of

controlling office – the responsibility of the omission is directly on the Manager.

The outcome of the entire evidence was, irregularly Loan was sanctioned to the father and Wife of the 1^st Party

workman. Both being the members of the family of the 1^st Party it is highly possible that at the insistence of the 1^st

Party the Manager committed the irregularities as alleged in the Charge Sheet. However, there was no complaint against

the 1^st Party nor did the Bank suffered any financial loss from the alleged incident. Mere suspension with or without

proof cannot take over the seat of legal evidence.

In the absence of any evidentiary material establishing

the complicity of the 1^st Party workman in the manipulation of the Bank records, the finding of the Enquiry Officer that,

7178

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(i)

He unauthorizedly made debit in SB A/c 1550,

(ii)

He coerced the manager for sanction of Loans,

(iii)

He tampered the Bank records,

without the foundation of evidentiary material, is perverse. Wherefore, the Punishment order passed on the

basis of such imperfect and fragile finding is illegal.

10.

Having said so, now the focus is on the nature of relief to be moulded. The 1^st Party though was not directly

involved in the alleged misconduct, it is obvious that he was the beneficiary of the misconduct / irregular Loan sanction.

The punishment of compulsory retirement on the 1^st Party workman who was in the midway of his carrier and had the

responsibility of raising a family on such petty reason is too harsh and disproportionate. The workman probably has few

more years of service if reinstated into service, he is enjoying retirement benefits. Having observed that, he was an

interested Party in the alleged misconduct in my considered opinion reinstatement with continuity of service without

back wages is the appropriate Award that would meet the situation.

AWARD

The reference is accepted.

The order of the 2^nd Party Canara Bank in imposing punishment of Compulsory Retirement from service dated

15.3.2006 against the 1^st Party workman Sh. Ganaganarasimaiah is set aside.

The 2^nd Party is directed to reinstate the workman into his original post with continuity of service without back

wages.

(Dictated to o/s LDC, transcribed by her, corrected and signed by me on 25^th September, 2019)

Justice Smt. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 vDrwcj] 2019

dk-vk- 1826-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ;wdks

cSad ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] caxyksj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 70@2008½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 01-

10-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12012@44@2008&vkbZ vkj ¼ch-II½]

lhek caly] vuqHkkx vfèkdkjh

New Delhi, the 1^st October, 2019

S.O. 1826.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 70/2008) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of UCO Bank, and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on 01.10.2019.

[No. L-12012/44/2008-IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIUBNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

BANGALORE

DATED : 26^th SEPTEMBER 2019

PRESENT: Justice Smt. Ratnakala, Presiding Officer

CR 70/2008

I Party

II Party

Sh. C.S. Srinathan,

No. 9, Akshaya Enclave,

Near Krishna Temple,

The Regional Manager,

UCO Bank,

Regional Office, 13/22,

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7179

Dwaraka Nagara, Ward No. 55,

Hosakerehalli,

Banashankari 3^rd Stage,

Bangalore - 560 085.

Kempegowda Road,

Bangalore - 560 009.

Appearance :

Advocate for I Party : Mr. Muralidhara

Advocate for II Party : Mr. Venugopal M S

AWARD

The Central Government vide Order No.L-12012/44/2008-IR(B-II) dated 01.09.2008 in exercise of the powers

conferred by Clause (d) of Sub-Section (1) and Sub-Section2(A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute act, 1947 (for

brevity ‘the Act’ hereafter) referred the following Industrial Dispute for adjudication.

“Whether the action of the management of UCO Bank, Karnataka in (a) Reducing the Basic Pay from

Rs. 14,330=00 to Rs. 13,770=00 w.e.f. 15.09.2006 and (b) Compulsory retirement from the Bank’s service

with terminal benefits w.e.f. 15.09.2006 in respect of Shri C.S. Srinathan, Ex-Special Assistant, PFM No.

24968, UCO Bank, Peenya Branch, Bangalore, Karnataka are legal and justified? What relief the

applicant workman is entitled to?”

The case of the 1^st Party workman is,

he joined the service of the 2^nd Party as a Clerk on 12.12.1979; while working in Peenya Branch he was issued charge

sheet dated 26.11.2005 on certain allegations; he submitted his reply. The 2^nd Party initiated Domestic Enquiry by

appointing Enquiry Officer and the Presenting Officer. He was not afforded reasonable opportunity during the enquiry;

the Enquiry Officer gave finding which is unreasonable and unjust. He submitted his Report holding Charge Nos. 1 and

2 were partly proved; Charge Nos. 3,4,5,7,9 and 10 were established by the Management and Charge Nos. 6 and 8 were

not proved. He was called upon by the Chief Officer of the 2^nd Party to submit his explanation to the Enquiry Report

and also the dissent note in respect of Charge no. 1 and 2. Accordingly, he submitted his explanation; vide order dated

23.08.2006 2^nd Party proposed the punishment of dismissal from service without terminal benefits. A personal hearing

was granted; he reiterated his contentions and urged the Chief Officer to consider the gravity of alleged misconduct and

to drop the proposed punishment of dismissal from service. The Chief Officer passed the final order of Compulsory

Retirement with terminal benefits and imposed the punishment of reduction of basic pay from Rs. 14,330/- to

Rs. 13,770/-. The order amounts to double jeopardy and is excessive and the appeal filed by him before the Appellate

Authority is turned down. Due to the punishment order he lost his livelihood, he has no source of income.

The 2^nd Party contested the claim and justified their action, they have also contended that during the Domestic

Enquiry he was given all reasonable opportunity and the enquiry held is proper, legal and justified. The Enquiry Officer

has analysed the evidence of both parties and has given cogent reasons coming to the conclusion. The Disciplinary

Authority was satisfied that the enquiry was held in fair and proper manner and he was given reasonable opportunity, the

Disciplinary Authority is also satisfied about the reasonable findings of the Enquiry Officer. The contentions put forth by

him in his representation and also during the personal hearing were examined by the Disciplinary Authority in detail.

Taking into consideration all those factors the proposed punishment of dismissal from service without terminal benefits

was revised to

Reducing the basic pay from Rs. 14,330/- to Rs.13,770/- w.e.f. 15.09.2006.

Compulsory retirement from the Bank’s service with terminal benefits w.e.f 15.09.2006 vide order

dated 15.09.2006.

Before passing the order his service records were perused, the misconduct proved is grave in nature because of his rude

and disorderly behaviour and also rendering poor service to the customers of the Bank, 79 Account Holders have closed

their accounts due to the rude behaviour of the 1^st Party that caused financial loss to the 2^nd Party. The image of the 2^nd

Party was tarnished before the public for the involvement of the 1^st Party in committing such misconducts. Punishment

order is fully justified.

Vide order dated 10.07.2012 the validity of the Domestic Enquiry conducted against the 1^st Party workman is

upheld. 1^st Party gave his evidence stating that he is not able to secure job anywhere in view of the punishment order, he

has no other source of income. During his cross examination he admits that prior to issue of charge sheet he was issued

memo for submitting false medical bills, he identified two memos issued in this regard as Ex M-1 is the memo and Ex

M-2 is the minor punishment passed. He further admits that he was issued memo for his unauthorised absence, he

7180

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

identified a complaint given by his colleagues against him as per Ex M-3, he further admits that on a allegation of

misbehaviour with customer he was kept under suspension by order dated 21.09.1999 as per Ex M-4 and Ex M-5 is the

show cause notice dated 06.10.1999 which was issued to him; on his reply punishment order of reduction of his basic

pay by one stage was ordered.

Arguments addressed by both counsels.

The Charges held as proved and partly proved by the Enquiry Officer are:

Charge No.1 - (Proved) the allegation is -

He is not in the habit of giving polite answers to customer queries.

He did not ensure immediate payment at the counters against withdrawal slips /cheques.

He did not issue cheque books to the customer on request

He failed to adhere to time norms as per Talwar Committee recommendations regarding customer

service.

e) He was replying sarcastically to the customers that you are not the masters for us to give our salaries.

Charge No.2 - (Partly Proved) the allegation is -

He Misbehaved and used abusive language with a customer Mr. Kumar and reportedly told him that yours is a worthless

account.

Charge No. 3 - (Proved) the allegation is -

When Ms. Sanjeevamma holder of SB Account No. 9329 enquired about her P.F cheque he expressed malice behaviour

and threatened that he will slap on her cheeks and

shouted at her to close the account.

Charge No. 4 - (Proved) the allegation is -

Ms. Siddagangamama holder of SB Account No. 12338 complained about his rude behaviour, whenever she visits for

SB transaction, he conversed in an abusive language saying you are fit to graze animals rather that coming for Bank

transactions.

Charge No. 5 - (Proved) the allegation is -

Mr. M.B. Gangadhar holder of SB Account No. 136743 has stated about his rude behaviour; Mr. Gangadhar introduced

many accounts and those account holders had similar experience.

Charge No. 7 - (Proved) the allegation is -

He was showing insubordination to the instruction of the Superiors to carry out customer service politely at SB counter

and was issued warning letter by the Senior Manager.

Charge No. 9 (Proved) - the allegation is -

While borrowing in the name of his wife from Kalpathru Garmeena Bank he gave the name of his Wife as Ms. Triveni

whereas her actual name is Ms. Manjula.

Charge No. 10 - (Proved) the allegation is -

Instead of helping the customers at the SB counter he was

accustomed to show finger towards the Senior Manager and Assistant Manager by asking the customer to contact them

with intention to slow down the allotted work.

Going by the evidence placed in respect of the above charges, on behalf of the Management 9 witnesses were

examined and 40 documents were exhibited; CSE opted not to adduce defence evidence, however 3 documents produced

by him were taken on record. The Investigation commenced on the workman on a mass complaint dated 21.09.2005

given by the account holders to the Regional Manager both in Kannada and English version.

The first witness / MW-1 is the customer of the Bank having Account No. 7471 in the 2^nd Party Bank, he

identified the complaint given by him and it was already marked as Ex ME-1. However, during examination in chief

evidence, itself he stated that he has given the complaint against the Branch as a whole, he did not pin point the CSE for

any inconvenience, much the less delay in issue of cheque books. During the cross examination he was confronted with

a letter authored by him appreciating good service of the CSE.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7181

The second witness was another account holder, he followed the suit of MW-1 and went on to state that he has

no complaint against the CSE.

The third and the fourth witnesses / lady customers were account holders, both of them did not corroborate the

allegation made by them in their complaint Ex ME-6 and Ex ME-5 respectively, though they admitted their signature on

the respective complaint.

The fifth witness / MW-5 another account holder / complainant is the person who introduced 150 accounts

holders to the Bank. During the examination in chief itself he has stated that none of the customer introduced by him

complained about the difficulties in the Bank. However, during the further course of evidence he stated that he did not

write the complaint but signed the white paper at the insistence of the 1^st Party. He cited an incident wherein he had

rubbed with the 1^st Party while crediting a cheque to the account of his sister. Further he stated that he has not come

across any incident of misbehaviour of the CSE towards customers more so ladies.

The sixth witness / MW-6 was another complainant, his complaint was already marked as Ex ME-24, in the said

complaint he had averred to the effect that as per the oral complaints of his employees (Power Gear Limited Peenya) the

CSE was behaving very rude with his employee and making derogatory marks against them and no employee was happy

with his service. He further asserted that the CSE is talking to several employees of the company who were signatories

to the original complaint, pleaded innocence and requested their help to save his job, he also approached the witness on

the similar plea on 11.10.2005; he was seen requesting the employees to drop the complaint filed by them against him.

He elaborated on his complaint by stating that the CSE told his employees “if you want to complain to the Manager you

can do so”. During the cross examination he admitted that in the complaint lodged by the customers they had not named

the CSE. During the cross examination also, he struck onto his examination in chief averments, he further stated during

the cross examination that on 11.10.2005 CSE approached the witness by taking permission from watch and ward

department and the reception counter, the movement of the every visitor will be recorded in the watch and ward register.

After talking to him, 1^st Party he was found talking to other staff members in the Administrative Building pleading with

them to withdraw the complaint; this was reported to him by the employees. He further admitted that he had visited the

Bank twice and there was no impolity by the CSE on such occasions. There was no delay for cheque books and

withdrawal slips from the Bank.

The seventh witness / MW-7 was the former colleague of the CSE, he sated that CSE was rude with the

customers and not obeying the orders of the superiors. In respect of the complaint Ex ME-1 lodged by the employees of

the Power Gear Company he stated the customers and the CSE were clashing at the counter and it was the order of the

day, such clashes were continuing from 15 minutes to half an hour depending on the intensity of their quarrel, that

destructed the customer service. Since he was attached to May I help you department the customer will go to him for

redressal of their grievance and they used to complain against the CSE. The complaint drew the attention of the

Manager and many customers approached the Manager directly. After the CSE was placed under suspension he used to

visit the Branch and was found moving with influential people of the local area; for the past 20 years whenever there is

complaint against him he approaches the complainants, plays whichever card is suitable to them and tries to make them

not to attend the enquiry and turn them hostile. He elaborated his allegation made during his examination in chief by

stating that one lady by name Mrs. Gowaramma came to the Bank to withdraw the amount from her Bank and she was

found weeping at the counter and going towards the Manager’s chamber. On 12.03.2004 Mrs. Siddagangamma (MW-3)

came to the Bank quarrelled with the CSE and wept. It was further extracted from him during the cross examination that

on 14.10.2005 at the instance of the Manager he wrote complaint as narrated by MW-3 and MW-4 in Kannada.

The eighth witness / MW-8 was the Investigating Officer who had submitted his investigating report Ex M-9, he

stated that most of the staff members are of the opinion that the CSE is not rendering good services at the counter, he had

recorded the statements of the customers having grievance against the Branch. He also affirmed the statement of the

then Manager and the Officials, whereby those officials had given statement against the CSE. He identified the

statements of the aggrieved customers namely Gangadhar and M.S Sanjevamma and receiving the complaints from

aggrieved customers Kumar and Siddagangamma. He further stated that during the course of investigation he visited the

Branch and found sizeable number of Accounts were closed because of the deficiency in service. It was further brought

during his cross examination that in the Investigation Report the witness had recorded about receiving the complaint

from Gangadhar, M.S Sanjevamma, Kumar and Siddagangamma on 07.10.2005 in the presence of the Senior Manager.

But in the Senior Manager’s report dated 08.10.2005/ Ex ME-7 was silent in this regard.

The ninth witness / MW-9 was the then Senior Manager of the Branch, he identified the letter Ex ME-39 issued

by the Manager to the CSE for his misbehaviour with the customers asking him to desist from misbehaviour with

customers or else suitable disciplinary action will be taken against him. He further stated that the CSE was misbehaving

with the customers and was giving rude replies, delaying payments and issue of cheque books etc., but he continued with

his misbehaviour in spite of the warning letter and the oral instruction. He identified the complaint Ex ME-1 given by 60

customers in respect of the misbehaviour and non-cooperation of the CSE. He further stated that in spite of Superiors

instruction to give courteous customer service at SB Counter, CSE was not carrying out the same and continues to

7182

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

misbehave with the customer which has tarnished the image of the Bank. He had issued a letter to the CSE on

03.10.2005 with a copy to the Regional Bank, Ex M-7 is the report submitted by him to the Investigating Officer

highlighting the above facts. He further stated that even for small things like issue of cheque book, opening of account

CSE used to avoid and direct the customers either to the Manger or to the witness; deliberately he will slow down the

allotted work and try to pass the work to his superiors.

One of the grounds of defence during his cross examination was, the Branch was insisting the customers

to take LIC policies. During the further course of cross examination, the witness stated that the Branch was not insisting

the customers for taking LIC policies but was requesting them to take the policies. The witness further stated that the

CSE visited the branch after suspension and requested him to save him from the complaint. He was informed by many

complainants of the Power Gear Limited Company that CSE had requested them with folded hands to drop the complaint

against him. He had received oral complaint from Smt. Sanjevamman and Smt. Siddagangamma on 07.10.2005 and

written complaint on 14.10.2005, in his report dated 07.10.2005 he could not report this fact since the written complaint

was not yet given.

During the further course of cross-examination MW-9 admits having issued a memo to the CSE on 03.10.2005. It

emerged during his further cross examination that the complaints were not registered in the inward mail of the Bank.

It was suggested during further cross examination that the complaint in English version (Ex ME-1) the name of

the CSE was mentioned whereas it was not there in the Kannada version of the complaint marked as Ex ME-1A and also

there was discrepancy in numbering the pages of ME-1 and ME-1A, MW-9 clarified that the complainants are of

Industrial workers there in ambiguity in pagination; both English and Kannada are part and parcel of their letter dated

21.09.2005, both Regional Office and Branch Office had received the same in one cover, they are not the full translation

of each other; they had regretted for omitting to include the name of the CSE in the Kannada version vide a subsequent

letter dated 27.09.2005.

Though no defence evidence was adduced a letter dated 27.09.2005 addressed by the customers to the Regional Manager

stating that they have not mentioned the name of CSE in their complaint at Kannada language was marked as Ex D-1.

The Insurance policy of Group Saving Link Insurance scheme of the 2^nd Party Branch was marked as Ex D-2 along with

the identity cards of the policy holders; a letter addressed to the customers returning the cheques credited to their

accounts was marked as Ex D-3, letters of appreciation by the customer about the service of the 1^st Party rendered to

them were also marked in Ex D-3 series.

Sh. M.D for the 1^st Party while taking me through the evidence of the witnesses would urge that dissatisfaction

of MW-1 was against the service rendered at the Branch in general and their was nothing pin pointing the 1^st Party

personally in his statement; MW-2 also stated about the general delay in the Branch without making any specific

compliant against the 1^st Party; MW-3 and MW-4 turned hostile to the prosecution case; MW-5 was the person who had

signed a letter on a blank paper for the 1^st Party; MW-6 was not a signatory to the complaint; MW-7 the colleague was

unable to give the details of the 79 accounts which were closed. Even otherwise there was no allegation touching the

integrity and honesty of the 1^st Party. Though it was alleged that because of him customers closed their accounts with

the Branch, no document was produced demonstrating that because of their dissatisfaction of the service rendered by the

1^st Party the accounts were closed. Accepting the entire evidence as a whole then also what emerges is the 1^st Party was

rough in his attitude towards colleagues, customers and superiors. By the punishment of compulsory refitment he lost

his valuable service of 11 years otherwise he would have attained superannuation in the year 2017. The punishment

order is too excessive and harsh as against the nature of the allegations proved against him. The punishment virtually put

an end to his prospectors in the midst of his promising career; since he has crossed the age of superannuation suitable

monetary compensation may be awarded.

As against this Sh. V.M.S for the 2^nd Party submits that this was not the first case of misconduct in the career of

the 1^st Party. Twice, he was punished, in one case the allegation was similar to the present case. He is a habitual, though

opportunity was given to rectify himself, he did not improve. Therefore, the punishment of Compulsory Retirement

commensurates with the gravity of the charges proved against him.

10.

Though it is argued there was no clinching evidence against the CSE in respect of the charges on a travel

through the entire evidence would demonstrate that the investigation was the off shoot of mass complaint from the

customers of the Branch, the complaint is lodged both in Kannada and English Language. The identity of the

complainants is not disputed; the S.B Account Number of each complainant is mentioned against the names of each

complainant. In the Kannada version of the complaint they have not vented out their grievance specifically against any

of the Bank Official. However, in the English version / Ex ME-1A they had reiterated the very same allegation, it was

mentioned that “Manager since to be helpless in controlling the staff members specifically Mr. Srinathan….” That

culminated in the Senior Manger submitting his report to his Regional Office and forwarding the complaint and calling

for explanation from the CSE. The Investigating Officer during the course of his investigation has recorded the

statements of the aggrieved customers who complained about the deficiency in service of the CSE. Though the

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7183

customers appeared before the Enquiry Officer turned hostile, they have not disputed their signatures in their statements

marked in evidence; there was no documentary proof with the Bank that the customers closed their account being

dissatisfied with the service offered.

11.

As per the statements of the customers marked as Ex ME-3 to Ex ME-6 series the CSE uses abusive languages

against the lady customers, unnecessarily delays to attend the customers etc. Though it was alleged in the complaint that

the Branch insists the customers to take the LIC policy and had issued notice to the customers who had already cleared

the loans that did not point towards the CSE specifically. The focus of the entire charge was on the rude behaviour of the

1^st Party against the customers.

12.

The 1^st Party during the course of his defence submitted a letter marked as Ex DE-1 stating that to be a copy of

the letter signed by the customers who had no grievance against the 1^st Party workman. The Enquiry Officer called for

the original letter from the Bank and found the document Ex DE-1 was not the copy of the original letter received in the

Bank. While there were 103 signatories at Ex DE-1 original document / Anneuxre-3 had signatures of only 45 persons.

Out of the 67 signatories at Ex DE-1, 44 signatories to the original complaint had not signed the mass letter. Thus, those

44 signatories were inferred by the Enquiry Officer that they stood by their original complaint. 80 signatories at Ex DE-

1 were not the signatories to the original complaint Ex DE-1. The Enquiry Officer inferred that, the 1^st Party had

managed to get the copy of letter dated 27.09.2005 and got the insertions made, contacted the persons whoever he came

across and made them to sign the letter and produce the document as Ex DE-1. There was ample evidence from the

prosecution witnesses MW-6 to MW-9 that he was prevailing on the complainants to sign in the letter to bail him out of

the Departmental Action, he had tampered the Management document. With regard to the charge of availing loan from

Kalpataru Grameena Bank by his wife Smt. C.S Manjula under the name of Smt. Triveni, from the prosecution

documents the Enquiry Officer noticed that on 22.04.1991 he had declared the name of his wife as Smt. Manjula in the

declaration form in respect of the family details furnished by him to the Bank. The defence was, he did not know about

the loan transaction of his wife with the Kalpataru Grameena Bank and did not know about her alias name Triveni; he

had produced documents two Voters IDs for different period and other documents. The Enquiry Officer called for

verification of the documents with the originals from the Bank and found that he had fabricated the GSLI form; it was

also further noticed that he had borrowed with Kalpataru Grameena Bank in the name of Ms. Triveni and at the Same

period borrowed from Bank of Maharashtra Rajarajeswarinagar Branch and also with Vysya Bank Ltd RVCE Branch; it

was further noticed that he manged to get 2 Voters IDs in different names, the ID card issued on 03.11.1996 confirmed

the name as Manjula which was changed to Ms. G Triveni w.e.f 29.08.2005. Even before 29.08.2005 he had borrowed

loan in the name of Triveni during 1988 from Kalpataru Grameena Bank and Bank of Maharashtra Rajarajeswarinagar

Branch and Vysya Bank RVCE Branch. That prompted the Enquiry Officer to draw inference that he was misusing both

names for his advantage. The Enquiry Officer brushed aside the defence contention that he was unaware of the fact that

his wife had another name Triveni since in his own document (verified by the Enquiry Officer as Annexure-IV dated

04.12.2003) he had given the name of his wife as G. Triveni. Contrary to his earlier stand in his written brief he

admitted that his wife had 2 names. That did not corroborate with the factualities since in the year 1986 itself he had

given the name of his wife as Triveni though her actual name on that day was Manjula. The Enquiry Officer deprecated

him for producing false and fabricated documents.

13.

Since the prosecution did not bring before the enquiry which part of the Talwar Committee Report was violated

the first charge was held partly proved. While appreciating the contention of the defence that refusal to issue cheque

book for valid reasons cannot be treated as rude behaviour, the Enquiry Officer from the oral evidence of the parties

observed that CSE could have avoided usage on intemperate language against the customer and in the absence of the

specific date (in the complaint Ex ME-4) as to on which date misbehaviour had taken place and the complainant had not

mentioned the numbers of his 4 SB Accounts which he was closing, the second charge was held partly proved to the

extent of misbehaviour. The quality of evidence in a Departmental Enquiry need not be on the principles of proof

beyond all reasonable doubt unlike Criminal Cases. The Enquiry Officer has evaluated the prosecution evidence

considering the outcome of cross examination and also defence documents and answered the charges 3,4,5,7,9 and 10 as

proved.

14.

It is not the case of the 1^st Party that anybody, either his colleagues or customers had schemed against him and

had planted evidence against him. Rightly the Enquiry Officer from the evidence of MW-5 / Sh. Gangadhar who

introduced many account holders to the Bank observes that there was incident of misbehaviour towards the customers

introduced and also towards the sister of the witness while she was trying to encash her P.F cheque, consequent upon

which the witness signed a complaint drafted by someone else and the CSE had approached him seeking his help. To

tide over the crisis MW-5 gave a blank paper signed for his use. The Enquiry Officer went by the averments of the

complaints given by Smt. Sanjevamma, Smt. Siddangangamma and Sh. Gangadhar, though they opted not to corroborate

their complaint allegations. The Senior Manager of the Branch had confirmed that the 1^st Party used to avoid even small

things like issuance of cheque books, opening of S.B Accounts and used to direct the customers to the Manager or the

Senior Manager and slow down his work deliberately. There was no convincing defence from the 1^st Party which could

effectively neutralise the incriminating evidence brought on record against him by the prosecution. Added to that on the

7184

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

earlier occasions his own colleagues had complained against him to the Chief Manager. Vide their letter dated

17.09.1999 (Ex M-3) the allegation pertains to his rude behaviour against the customers, delay in handing over the cash

packets to the Chief Cashier of Bangalore City. They warned that his misbehaviour is spreading among other staffs and

they are also turning non-cooperative. In the light of the above I am convinced that enquiry findings flow from the

discussions made by the Enquiry Officer on proper analysis of the evidence and it is not a perverse finding.

15.

The Disciplinary Authority on receipt of the Enquiry Report had called for his remarks by proposing the

punishment of dismissal from service with terminal benefits. The 1^st Party during the personal hearing represented that,

he had worked sincerely for the Bank and has not violated the Bank’s rules and regulations; assuming that the charges

are really true the punishment proposed is disproportionate to the alleged charges, he projected his responsibility to

maintain his dependent family and about his heart alignment and requested for a lenient view.

16.

The Disciplinary Authority in its final order commenced from the premise that his representation of sincere

work is negatived by the earlier departmental action taken against him, from the management exhibits EX M-27, 28, 30,

31 and Ex M-37 which were the minor punishments imposed on him on his earlier misconducts. Relying on the

Authorities and appreciating the Enquiry findings, it was observed that subsequent to 21.03.2005 (the date on which

mass complaint was received in the office) utpo 21.09.2005 instead of maintaining good customer service record which

he was quoting, he resorted to the method of defiant and deficient customer service which culminated in issuance of

charge sheet. However, considering his representation of hardship lenient view was taken by bringing down his present

basic pay of Rs. 14,330/- to 13,770/- in respect of charges one and two which were held partly proved, Major punishment

of Compulsory Retirement with terminal benefits on the charge no. 3,4,5,7,9 and 10 which was held proved by the

Enquiry Officer was ordered.

17.

Though on principle the punishment order appears justified, in the back drop of the charges proved against the

workman, in the considered opinion of this Tribunal imposing of minor punishment in reducing the basic pay was

excessive. The Disciplinary Authority having considered the hardship of the 1^st Party that he was a heart patient and had

a school going child and a aged mother who was in a critical condition could have contained from imposing the

punishment of reduction of his basic pay that would have, to certain extent enhanced the quantum of the monetary

benefits / his retirement benefit. Hence, the intervention of this Tribunal in exercising of the jurisdiction under sec 11-A

of ‘the Act’ is warranted to modify the punishment order to the extent of setting aside the punishment order whereby his

basic pay was ordered to be reduced from Rs. 14,330/- to Rs. 13,770/-.

AWARD

The reference is accepted. The punishment order dated 15.09.2006 passed against the 1^st Party workman

Sh. C. S. Srinathan is modified.

The punishment of reduction of his basic pay of Rs. 14,330/- to Rs. 13,770/- in respect of first and second charge

which were held partly proved is set aside.

The punishment of compulsory retirement with terminal benefits imposed in respect of charges 3,4,5,7,9 and 10

which are held proved shall remain intact.

The arrears of monetary benefit arising from the above modification shall be released to the workman within 2

months from the date of publication of the Award in the Official Gazette failing which the amount shall carry

simple interest at the rate of 6% per annuum.

(Dictated to o/s Steno, transcribed by her, corrected and signed by me on 26^th September 2019)

Justice Smt. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 vDrwcj] 2019

dk-vk- 1827-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj iatkc

us'kuy cSad ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k iVuk ¼fcgkj½ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 06 ,oa 07 ¼lh½@2015½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

01-10-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&39025@01@2019&vkbZ vkj ¼ch-II½]

lhek caly] vuqHkkx vfèkdkjh

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7185

New Delhi, the 1^st October, 2019

S.O. 1827.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 06 & 07(C) of 2015) of the Industrial Tribunal, PATNA(BIHAR) as

shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Punjab National Bank and their workmen,

received by the Central Government on 01.10.2019.

[No. L-39025/01/2019-IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, PATNA

I.D. Case No. 06 (C) of 2015

Between the management of Circle Head, Punjab National Bank, Circle Office, Chanakya Place, ‘R’ Block,

Patna-800001 and Their workman Sri Sunny Dayal, S/o- Sri Shrawan Sao, C/o- Doman Ji, Mohanpur, Punaichak, P.O-

Shree Nagar, P.S- Shastri Nagar, Dist.- Patna-800023.

I.D. Case No. 07 (C) of 2015

Between the management of Circle Head, Punjab National Bank, Circle Office, Chanakya Place, ‘R’

Block, Patna-800001 and Their workman Md. Zamil Ahmad, S/o- Late Abdul Gafoor, C/o- Ishar Daroga, Vill.- Nausa,

P.O- Pulwari Sharif, Dist.- Patna-801505.

For the management : Sri Ranjit Kumar Karan, Officer.

Sri R.R. Jha, Senior Manager, HRD

For the Workman :

Sri B. Prasad, President of Bank Employees Federation, Bihar

Present : Vishweshwar Nath Mishra, Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Patna

AWARD

Patna, dt- 11^th September, 2019

Both the aforesaid cases have been filed u/s 2A ( 1 & 2 ) of the Industrial Dispute ( Amendment ) Act, 2010 by

the aforesaid workmen who seek relief of reinstatement in the services w.e.f 10.02.2015 & 01.03.2015 respectively with

back wages, confirmation / regularization in the services of the bank as a part time sweeper under 1/3^rd scale wages of a

subordinate staff, and for payment of cost of Rs. 10000/- for contesting the dispute.

Matter was raised by the workmen before the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Patna ( for short A.L.C

( C ) Patna ) on 17.02.2015 and 20.02.2015 respectively who issued notice dt- 20.02..2015 and 24.02.2015 to the parties

vide file no.- 1/15/2015/ALC -I and another file no.- 1/20/2015/ALC-1.

As a period of more than 45 days elapsed with no sign of any settlement, the workman preferred an application

before this tribunal as per the provisions of section 2A ( 1 & 2 ) of the Industrial Disputes (Amendement ) Act, 2010.

Both parties appeared in both cases before this tribunal and management filed written statement.

A petition has been filed on behalf of the workman on 27.05.2019 praying therein to withdraw the instant

I.D.Case in view of the judgement of the Hon’ble Patna High Court.

In the instant case a petition has been filed on behalf of the workman on 27.05.2019 stating therein that in view

of the recent judgement of the Hon’ble Patna High Court passed in C.W.J.C No.- 2053 of 2016 on 22.11.2017 and

confirmed in L.P.A No.- 1822 of 2017 on 17.05.2018 the present I.D. Case is not maintainable and hence the same

should be permitted to withdraw in the interest of justice.

Heard both the parties.

7186

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Accordingly, In view of the petition dt-27.05.2019 filed by the workman, the instant I.D.Case is hereby

dispossed of as withdrawan and also being not maintainable in view of the aforesaid judgement of the Hon’ble Patna

High Court. This award is effected after gazette notification / publication of award.

Accordingly, this is my award.

11.09.2019

VISHWESHWAR NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 vDrwcj] 2019

dk-vk- 1828-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj bf.M;u

vksojlht cSad ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa vkS|ksfxd

vf/kdj.k] iVuk ¼fcgkj½ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 04 ¼lh½@2017½ dks izdkf”kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 01-10-2019 dks

izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&39025@01@2019&vkbZ vkj ¼ch-II½]

lhek caly] vuqHkkx vfèkdkjh

New Delhi, the 1^st October, 2019

S.O. 1828.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 04(C) of 2017) of the Industrial Tribunal, PATNA (BIHAR) as

shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Indian Overseas Bank and their workmen,

received by the Central Government on 01.10.2019.

[No. L-39025/01/2019-IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, PATNA

I.D. Case No. 04 (C) of 2017

Between the management of (1) General Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Personnel Administration Deptt.

Central Office, 763, Annasalai, Chennai-600002. (2) Senior Regional Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Regional Office,

West Gandhi Maidan, Patna-800001 and their workman Sri Ram Kumar, S/O- Chutur Prasad, Madan Lal Jain Gali,

Chandmari, Road, Kankarbagh, Patna-800020.

For the management :

Sri Neeraj Kumar, Assistant Manager, Regional Office, Lucknow

For the workman :

Sri B. Prasad, President, President, Bank Employees Federation, Bihar

Present : Vishweshwar Nath Mishra Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Patna

AWARD

Patna,dt- 11^th September, 2019

The present case has been filed u/s 2A ( 1 & 2 ) of the Industrial Dispute ( Amendment ) Act, 2010 by the

aforesaid workman who seeks relief of reinstatement in the services of the bank w.e.f 23.08.2016 with full back wages,

regularization of his services as a peon, payment of due wages for the period of working, and payment of a sum of

Rs. 10000/- to the workman for contesting the dispute..

Matter was raised by the workman before the Regional Labour Commissioner ( Central ), Ministry of Labour,

Maurya Lok Complex, 2^nd Floor, Block ‘A’ Dak Bunglow Road, Patna-1 vide application dated- 30.09.2016 which was

received by the office on 30.09.2016 ( for short R.L.C ( C ), who a issued notice vide File No.-2/74/2016/RLC dated-17 /

18th October, 2016 to the concerned parties.

The Regional Labour Commissioner ( C ) Patna held conciliation proceedings and tried his level best to settle

the dispute but due to the non-conciliatory attitude of the management, the conciliation proceedings ended in failure.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vDrwcj 12] 2019@vkf'ou 20] 1941

7187

After filing the dispsute, a period of 45 days elapsed and accordingly, as per the provisions of Section 2A

( 1 & 2 ) of the Industrial Dispute ( Amendment ) Act, 2010, an application is being filed before this Tribunal.

Both parties appeared before this tribunal and management also filed written statement.

In the instant case a petition has been filed on behalf of the management on 06.03.2018 stating therein that in

view of the recent judgement of the Hon’ble Patna High Court passed in C.W.J.C No.- 2053 of 2016 on 22.11.2017 and

confirmed in L.P.A No.- 1822 of 2017 on 17.05.2018 the present I.D. Case is not maintainable and hence the same

should be rejected.

A petition has also been filed on behalf of the workman on 09.04.2019 praying therein to withdraw the instant

I.D.Case in view of the judgement of the Hon’ble Patna High Court and the workman himself wants to withdraw the

I.D.Case.

Heard both the parties.

Accordingly, In view of the petition dt-09.04.2019 filed by the workman, the instant I.D.Case is hereby

dispossed of as withdrawn and also being not maintainable in view of the aforesaid judgement of the Hon’ble Patna

High Court. This award is effected after gazette notification / publication of award.

Accordingly, this is my award.

11.09.2019

VISHWESHWAR NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 1 vDrwcj] 2019

dk-vk- 1829-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ;wdks cSad

ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdkas vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k] iVuk

¼fcgkj½ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 13 ¼lh½@2015½ dks izdkf”kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 01-10-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&39025@01@2019&vkbZ vkj ¼ch-II½]

lhek caly] vuqHkkx vfèkdkjh

New Delhi, the 1^st October, 2019

S.O. 1829.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 13(C) of 2015) of the Industrial Tribunal, PATNA (BIHAR) as

shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of UCO Bank and their workmen, received by

the Central Government on 01.10.2019.

[No. L-39025/01/2019-IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, PATNA

I.D. Case No.:- 13 (C) of 2015

Between The General Manager, ( Human Resources Manageent) UCO Bank, Head Office, 10, Brabourne Road,

Kolkata-700001 (2) The Zonal Manager, UCO Bank, Zonal Office, Maurya Lok Complex, Block ‘A’, 4^th Floor,

Patna-800001 and their workman Sri Sanjay Kumar S/o- Balgovind Rout, At & P.O- Kalyanpur, P.S- Bariarpur,

Dist.- Munger.

For the management :

Sri Ashwani Kumar Sinha, Advocate.

For the workman :

Sri B. Prasad, State Secretary, Uco Bank Employees Association

Present

Vishweshwar Nath Mishra Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Patna

7188

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 12, 2019/ASVINA 20, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AWARD

Patna, dt- 31^st May, 2018

The present case has been filed u/s- 2A ( 1 & 2 ) of the Industrial Dispute ( Amendment ) Act, 2010 by the

aforesaid workman who seeks relief of over wrongful termination and denial of regularisation in the serves of the Bank.

Matter was raised by the workman before the Labour Commissioner (Central ), Pakur, Jharkhand ( for short L.C

( C ), who issued notice vide letter no.- 5 /51 /2015 / ALC-PKR dt- 1^st July, .2015.

Both parties appeared before this tribunal and filed their statement of claim & additional statement of claim and

written statement.

The workman has stated that the management terminated the services of the workman w.e.f. 14.07.4015 in

violation of the provisions of section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act and information of termination of services of the

workman was given to the conciliation officer. As a period of more than 45 days elapsed with no sign of any settlement,

the workman preferred an application before this tribunal as per the provision of section 2A (1 & 2 ) of the Industrial

Disputes ( Amendment ) Act, 2010.

M.W-1 Smt. Poonam Kumari, on behalf of the management has been examined, cross- examined and

discharged.

In the instant case a petition has been filed on behalf of the management on 05.02.2018 stating therein that in

view of the recent judgement of the Hon’ble Patna High Court passed in C.W.J.C No.- 2053 of 2013 the present I.D.

Case is not maintainable and hence the same should be rejected.

On the other hand a petition has been filed on behalf of the workman on 18.04.2018 praying therein to withdraw

the instant I.D.Case.

Heard of both the parties. As the petitioner / workman himself wants to withdraw I.D. Case, hence his prayer is

hereby allowed and the I.D. Case is accordingly disposed off as withdrawn.

Hence in this I. D. Case at present “ No Dispute Award” is being passed technically but not on merit in view of

the consent of both the parties as well as in view the recent judgement of the Hon’ble Patna High Court as aforesaid.

This award is effected after gazette notification / publication of award.

Accordingly, this is my award.

31.05.2018

VISHWESHWAR NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer

Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054. ALOK KUMAR

Digitally signed by ALOK KUMAR

Date: 2019.10.23 13:51:36 +05'30'