6572 GI/2019

(8239)

jftLVªh la- Mh- ,y- (,u) 04@0007@2003µ05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

xxxGIDHxxx

xxxGIDExxx

izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

lkIrkfgd

WEEKLY

la- 53]

ubZ fnYyh] fnlEcj 29] 2019—tuojh 4] 2020] 'kfuokj@ikS"k 8—IkkS"k 14] 1941

No. 53]

NEW DELHI, DECEMBER 29, 2019— JANUARY 4, 2020, SATURDAY/PAUSHA 8— PAUSHA —14, 1941

bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g i`Fkd ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk lds

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

Hkkjr ljdkj ds ea=kky;ksa (j{kk ea=kky; dks NksM+dj) }kjk tkjh fd, x, lkafof/d vkns'k vkSj vf/lwpuk,a

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

सीमा

सीमा शुक

शुक

शुक आयु

आयु

आयु त

त

त का

का

का काया लय

काया लय

मंगलूर, 23 अग त, 2019

सं.

सं. 01

01/2019

/2019

िवषय : हासन आई.सी.डी

िवषय : हासन आई.सी.डी - सीमा शु क

सीमा शु क

सीमा शु क े के प म अिधसूिचत े से संबंिधत

े के प म अिधसूिचत े से संबंिधत

अिधसूचना र करने के संबंध म

का.आ.

का.आ. 2218

2218

2218.—आयु त, सीमा शु क, कीय उपाद शुक और सेवा कर, मैसूर, ने दनांक 19.03.2009 क$

अिधसूचना, सं 1/2009 सी.शु (एन.टी.) )ारा सीमा शु क अिधिनयम, 1962, के िनयम 8 के अधीन कना+टक रा, य के हासन

िजला, हासन तालुक के दो0बसवनह ली, गॉव के सव3 सं. 112-पी, 113-पी एवं 114-पी म िथत हासन 6ोथ सटर,

शांती6ाम के पूरे 40509 वग+ मीटर प:र;े< को इनल>ड कंटेनर िडपो, हासन म आयाितत वतु@ के उतारने और िनया+त हेतु

सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-16012020-215472

CG-DL-W-16012020-215472

8240

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 4, 2020/PAUSHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

वतु@ के लादान के उAेBय से सीमा शुक प:र;े< के Cप म अिधसूिचत कया था । अिधसूचना सं. 82/2017 सी. शु.

(एन.टी.) दनांक 24.08.2017, यथासंशोिधत, के आलोक म कना+टक रा,य के हासन िजला के अधीन ;े< सीमा शुक

आयुJालय, मंगलूर के ;े<ाधीन आ गये ह> ।

सहायक आयु त, सीमा शु क , ई.पी. सेल, हासन ने अब यह :रपोट+ कया है क उJ इनल>ड कंटेनर िडपो, हासन,

काय+रत नहL है और कई वषO से कागP के आयात या िनया+त का काय+ नहL हो रहा है । उपरो त को Q यान म रखते Sए सीमा

शु क अिधिनयम 1962 के िनयम 8 के तहत जारी दनांक 19.03.2009, क$ अिधसूचना सं 1/2009 को रA कया जाता है

िजसके फल वCप हासन िजला, हासन तालुक के दो0बसवनह ली, गॉव के सव3 सं. 112-पी, 113-पी एवं 114-पी के पूरे

40509 वग+ मीटर प:र;े< आयाितत वतु@ के उतारने एवं िनया+त हेतु वतु@ के लादान के िलए सीमा शुक प:र;े< नहL

है।

[फा. सं. सी. सं./एस-12/20/2018 सीएच]

बसवराज नलेगावे, आयु त

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

Mangaluru, the 23rd August, 2019

No. 01 /2019

Subject: Hassan ICD - Denotification of specified area notified as Customs Area - reg.

…

S.O. 2218.—The Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Mysore vide Notification

No. 1/2009–Cus (N.T.) dated 19.03.2009 had notified under Section 8 of the Customs Act, 1962, the entire area of

40509 Sqm., in Plot No.1-B3 and 1-C1, Hassan Growth Centre, Shanthigrama, Survey No.112-P, 113-P and 114-P,

Doddabasavanahalli Village, Hassan Taluk, Hassan District, Karnataka State as ‘Customs Area’ in respect of Inland

Container Depot at Hassan for the purpose of unloading of import goods and loading of export goods. Further, in

terms of Notification No. 82/2017-Cus (N.T.) dated 24.08.2017, as amended, on the jurisdiction of various Customs

Commissionerates, the areas in the district of Hassan, in the State of Karnataka came under the jurisdiction of

Commissioner of Customs, Mangalore.

It has now been reported by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, E.P. Cell, Hassan that Inland Container

Depot, Hassan is non functional and there are no activities of import or export of cargo since many years. In view of the

above, the Notification No. 1/2009–Cus (N.T.) dated 19.03.2009 issued in terms of Section 8 of the Customs Act, 1962,

is hereby rescinded and in effect, the entire area of 40509 Sqm., in Plot No.1-B3 and 1-C1, Hassan Growth Centre,

Shanthigrama, Survey No.112-P, 113-P and 114-P, Doddabasavanahalli Village, Hassan Taluk, Hassan District,

Karnataka State ceases to be ‘Customs Area’ for the purpose of unloading of import goods and loading of export

goods.

[F. No. C. No. S-12/20/2018 CH]

BASWARAJ NALEGAVE, Commissioner

मंगलूर, 3 िसतV बर, 2019

सं.

सं. 02 /2019

02 /2019

िवषय: सी.शु.

िवषय: सी.शु. – हासन इनल!ड कंटेनर िडपो म सीमा शु क

हासन इनल!ड कंटेनर िडपो म सीमा शु क

हासन इनल!ड कंटेनर िडपो म सीमा शु क काग& सेवा (दाता क* िनयुि+ को र करने के संबंध म

काग& सेवा (दाता क* िनयुि+ को र करने के संबंध म

का.

का. आ.

आ.

आ. 2219

2219

2219.—आयु त, सीमा शु क, कीय उपाद और सेवा कर, मैसूर, ने सीमा शुक ;े<ीय िविनयमन 2009,

िविनयमन 10 के साथ प:ठत सीमा शुक अिधिनयम, 1962 क$ धारा 45(1) के अधीन XदY शिJयZ का Xयोग करते Sए

कना+टक रा, य के हासन िजला, दो0बसवनह ली ग[व, हासन तालुक के \लॉट सं. 1-बी3 और 1-सी1, हासन उ]यन क,

औ^ोिगक ;े<, शांती6ाम, सव3 सं. 112-पी, 113-पी, एवं 114-पी, म िथत इनल>ड कंटेनर िडपो म अवत:रत माल को सीमा

शु क अिधिनयम, 1962 के XावधानZ के अधीन घरेलु उपभो,य या भंडारण या पोत भरण के िलए िनकासी होने तक और

िनया+त करने के उAेBय से रखे गए माल को िनया+त करने तक, मेसस+ िवbम लािजिट स एवं मेरीटाईम सवcसस(X)िलिमटेड,

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 4] 2020@IkkS"k 14] 1941

8241

तीसरा तल, चबर@ मं<ी , सं 10, :रचमंड रोड़, बगलूर 560 025 (इसके उपरांत मेसस+.वीएलएमएस के नाम से िविनeदf)

को अिभर;क और/या इनल>ड कंटेनर िडपो म अवत:रत आयाितत माल के सीमा शुक वतु सेवा Xदाता के Cप म िनयुJ

कया था इसके उपरांत दनांक 18.08.2011 क$ अिधसूचना सं 1/2011-सी.शु.(एन.:ट.) )ारा इसक$ िनयुिJ का नवीकरण

अगले दो वष+ के िलए कया था । अिधसूचना सं. 82/2017 सी. शु. (एन.टी.) दनांक 24.08.2017, यथासंशोिधत, के

आलोक म कना+टक रा,य के हासन िजला के अधीन ;े< सीमा शुक आयुJालय, मंगलूर के ;े<ाधीन आ गये ह>।

सहायक आयु त, सीमा शु क, ई.पी. सेल, हासन ने अब यह :रपोट+ कया है क उJ इनल>ड कंटेनर िडपो, हासन,

काय+रत नहL है और कई वषO से कागP के आयात या िनया+त का काय+ नहL हो रहा है । उपरो त को Q यान म रखते Sए दनांक

19.05.2009, क$ अिधसूचना सं. 4/2009-सी.शु.(एन.:ट.) एवं दनांक 18.08.2011 क$ अिधसूचना सं. 01/2011-

सी.शु.(:ट.एन.) को रA कया जाता है उसके फल वCप मेसस+ िवbम लािजिट स एवं मेरीटाईम सवcसस तीसरा तल,

चबर@ मं<ी, सं 10, :रचमंड रोड़,बगलूर560 025 (X)िलिमटेड (जो दनांक 12.09.2014 से मेसस+ िडिgh यूशन

लािजिट स इनफरा g टरस Xाईवेट िलिमटेड के नाम से जाना जाता है) को कना+टक रा, य के हासन िजला, हासन तालुक के

दो0बसवनह ली ग[व के \लॉट सं. 1-बी3 और 1-सी1, हासन 6ोथ क, शांती6ाम, सव3 सं 112-पी, 113-पी, एवं 114-पी, म

िथत इनल>ड कंटेनर िडपो म, अिभर;क और/या आयाितत माल एवं िनया+त करने के िलए रखे सामान के संर;क एवं सेवा

Xदाता के Cप म उसक$ िनयुिJ को रA कया जाता है ।

[फा. सं. सी.सं./एस-12/20/2018 सीएच]

बसवराज नलेगावे, आयु त

Mangaluru, the 3rd September, 2019

No. 02 /2019

Subject: – Customs- Rescinding of Notification of Appointment of Customs Cargo Services Provider at Inland

Container Depot, Hassan - reg.

S.O. 2219.—The Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax, Mysore vide Notification

No. 4/2009–Cus (N.T.) dated 19.05.2009 had appointed M/s Vikram Logistic and Maritime Services (P) Ltd., 3^rd Floor,

Chambers @ Mantri No.10, Richmond Road, Bangalore- 560 025 to be Custodian and/or the Customs Cargo Services

provider of the imported goods landed and for the goods intended for export at Inland Container Depot at Plot No.1-B3

and 1-C1, Hassan Growth Centre, Shanthigrama, Survey No.112-P, 113-P and 114-P, Doddabasavanahalli Village,

Hassan Taluk, Hassan district, Karnataka State, under Section 45 of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Regulation 10 of

Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009. The Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax,

Mysore vide Notification No. 01/2011–Cus (N.T.) dated 18.08.2011 renewed the appointment of M/s Vikram Logistic

and Maritime Services (P) Ltd., 3^rd Floor, Chambers @ Mantri No.10, Richmond Road, Bangalore- 560 025 as the

Custodian and/or the Customs Cargo Services provider of the imported goods landed at Inland Container Depot, Hassan

for a further period of two years. Further, in terms of Notification No. 82/2017-Cus (N.T.) dated 24.08.2017, as

amended, on the jurisdiction of various Customs Commissionerates, the areas in the district of Hassan, in the State of

Karnataka came under the jurisdiction of Commissioner of Customs, Mangalore.

It has now been reported by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, E.P. Cell, Hassan that the said Inland

Container Depot, Hassan is non functional and there are no activities of import or export of cargo since many years. In

view of the above, the Notification No. 4/2009–Cus (N.T.) dated 19.05.2009 and Notification No. 01/2011–Cus (N.T.)

dated 18.08.2011 are hereby rescinded and in effect, the appointment of M/s Vikram Logistic and Maritime Services (P)

Ltd. (known by the name M/s Distribution Logistics Infrastructure Private Ltd. with effect from 12.09.2014), 3^rd Floor,

Chambers @ Mantri No.10, Richmond Road, Bangalore- 560 025 as the Custodian and/or the Customs Cargo Services

provider of the imported goods landed and for the goods intended for export at Inland Container Depot at Plot No.1-B3

and 1-C1, Hassan Growth Centre, Shanthigrama, Survey No.112-P, 113-P and 114-P, Doddabasavanahalli Village,

Hassan Taluk, Hassan district, Karnataka State stands cancelled.

[F. No. C. No. S-12/20/2018 CH]

BASWARAJ NALEGAVE, Commissioner

8242

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 4, 2020/PAUSHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िव, मंालय

(िवीय सेवाएं िवभाग)

नई द ली, 20 दसVबर, , , , 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 2220

2220

2220.—इस िवभाग क$ दनांक 13.12.2013 क$ अिधसूचना संi या 7/4/2013-बीओ-I तथा

दनांक 20.12.2018 क$ अिधसूचना संi या 7/7/2018-एसी के संदभ+ म केjीय सरकार, , , , एतkारा, , , , राlीय कृिष और 6ामीण

िवकास ब>क (नाबाड+) के अQ य; के Cप म nी हष+ कुमार भनवाला (जjम ितिथ: 27.11.1961) क$ काया+विध को

दनांक 18.12.2019 से छ: माह क$ अविध के िलए, या नए अQ य; क$ िनयुिJ तक, या अगले आदेशZ तक, जो भी पहले हो,

बढ़ाती है।

[फा. सं. 7/7/2018-एसी]

ए. के. दास, , , , उप सिचव

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Financial Services)

New Delhi, the 20th December, 2019

S.O. 2220.—With reference to this Department’s Notifications No. 7/4/2013-BO-I dated 13.12.2013 and

No. 7/7/2018-AC dated 20.12.2018, the Central Government hereby extends the tenure of Shri. Harsh Kumar Bhanwala

(DoB: 27.11.1961) as Chairman, National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD), for a period of six

months with effect from 18.12.2019, or till appointment of a new Chairman, or until further orders, whichever is the

earliest.

[F. No. 7/7/2018-AC]

A. K. DAS, Dy. Secy.

नई द ली, 27 दसV बर, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 2221

2221

2221.—भारतीय जीवन बीमा िनगम अिधिनयम, 1956 (1956 का 31) क$ धारा 4 )ारा XदY शिJयZ

का Xयोग करते Sए, केjीय सरकार, एतkारा, nी िगरीश चj मुमु+, भूतपूव+ सिचव (qय) के थान पर nी इंजेटी nीिनवास,

सिचव, कारपोरेट काय+ मं<ालय को तकाल Xभाव से और अगले आदेशZ तक, उJ िनगम के सदय के Cप म िनयुJ करती है।

[फा. सं. 14/3/2003-बीमा-I]

उमेश चj, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 27th December, 2019

S. O. 2221.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 4 of the Life Insurance Corporation of India Act,

1956 (31 of 1956), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Injeti Srinivas, Secretary, Ministry of Corporate Affairs,

as member of the said Corporation vice Sh. Girish Chandra Murmu, erstwhile Secretary (Expenditure) with immediate

effect and until further orders.

[F. No. 14/3/2003-Ins.-I]

UMESH CHANDRA, Under Secy.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 4] 2020@IkkS"k 14] 1941

8243

िवदेश

िवदेश मंालय

मंालय

नई द ली, 13 दसV बर, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 2222

2222

2222.—कीय सरकार (संघ के शासक$य XयोजनZ के िलए) राजभाषा िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उप-

िनयम (4) के अनुसरण म, िवदेश मं<ालय के ;े<ीय पासपोट+ काया+लय, एस.सी.ओ. नं. 42-51, पॉकेट-1, बस टड के पास,

जालंधर-144001 (पंजाब) को िजसके 80% से अिधक कम+चा:रयZ ने rहदी का काय+साधक sान Xा\ त कर िलया है,

अिधसूिचत करती है।

[फा. सं. यू

rहदी

621/21/2018]

सजीव बाबु कुCप, संयु त सिचव

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

New Delhi, the 13th December, 2019

S. O. 2222.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for the official purpose of

the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies the Regional Passport Office, SCO No. 42-51, Pocket-

1, Near Bus Stand, Jalandhar-144001(Punjab) of the Ministry of External Affairs, more than 80% staff whereof have

acquired working knowledge of Hindi.

[F. No. Q/Hindi/621/21/2018]

SAJEEV BABU KURUP, Jt. Secy.

का-मक

का-मक, लोक िशकायत तथा पशन मंालय

लोक िशकायत तथा पशन मंालय

(कामक और िशण िवभाग)

नई द ली, 27 दसV बर, 2019

का.आ.

का.आ. 2223

2223

2223.—केj सरकार एतद)ारा द ली िवशेष पुिलस थापना अिधिनयम, 1946 (1946 क$ अिधिनयम

संi या 5) क$ धारा 6 के साथ प:ठत धारा 5 क$ उपधारा (1) )ारा XदY शिJयZ का Xयोग करते Sए तिमलनाडू सरकार, गृह

(पीओएल.VII) िवभाग क$ अिधसूचना सं. जी.ओ. (एमएस) सं. 702 दनांक 14 दसंबर 2019 के माQयम से Xाt सहमित

सहमित से, 6ेटर चेuई, कीय अपराध शाखा-I, म वत+मान म दwड Xbया संिहता, 1973 (1974 का अिधिनयम सं. 2) क$

धारा 174 के तहत दज+ अपराध सं 327 सन् 2019, सुnी फाितमा लाथीफ पु<ी अhदुल लाथीफ क$ मृयु से जुड़े अपराध(धZ)

के अj वेषण करने के िलए तथा इससे संबx या उसी संy यवहार म कए गए या उj हL तz यZ से उपu कसी एक या अिधक

अपराध(धZ) म कए गए कjहL XयासZ, दु{ Xेरणा@ और ष|ं<Z क$ जांच करने के िलए द ली िवशेष पुिलस थापना के

सद यZ क$ शिJयZ और ;े<ािधकार का िव तार समत तिमलनाडू रा, य म करती है।

[फा. सं. 228/44/2019-एवीडी-II)]

एस. पी. आर. ि<पाठी, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department of Personnel and Training)

New Delhi, the 27th December, 2019

S.O. 2223.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub section (1) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi

Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the State

Government of Tamil Nadu, Home(POL.VII) Department, accorded vide G.O.(Ms) No.702 dated 14^thDecember, 2019,

hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment in whole State of

Tamil Nadu for investigation of the offence(s) relating to the case registered in Greater Chennai, Central Crime Branch-I,

Crime No. 327 of 2019, presently registered under section 174 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act No. 2 of

8244

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 4, 2020/PAUSHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1974), pertaining to the death of Ms. Fathima Lathief D/o Abdul Lathief and any attempt, abetment, and conspiracy in

relation to or in connection with one or more such offence(s) committed in the course of the same transaction or arising

out of the same facts.

[F. No. 228/44/2019-AVD-II]

S. P. R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

jk”Vªh; vkink izca/ku izkf/kdj.k

ubZ fnYyh] 26 fnlEcj] 2019

dkdkdkdk-vkvkvkvk- 2224

2224

2224.—vkink izca/ku vf/kfu;e] 2005 ¼2005 dk 53½ dh /kkjk 7 dh mi /kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznŸk ‘kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,]

vf/klwpuk la- 2801 fnukad 29-11-2016 ds }kjk xfBr 15 lnL;ksa okyh jk”Vªh; vkink izca/ku izkf/kdj.k ¼,u-Mh-,e-,-½ dh lykgdkj lfefr dh

vof/k dks fnukad 27-11-2020 rd c<+k;k tkrk gSA

lykgdkj lfefr ds lnL;ksa dks ,sls ;k=k HkŸks] dejs dk fdjk;k] nSfud HkŸks rFkk okgu HkŸks dk Hkqxrku fd;k tk,xk tks vuqiwjd fu;e

190 ds ifjf’k”V&2 esa ;Fkk mfYyf[kr mPpkf/kdkj izkIr lfefr ds ,d lnL; dks vuqes; gSaA

[Qk- la- 8-1@2018-leUo;@,uMh,e,]

th- oh- oh- ‘kekZ] lnL; lfpo

NATIONAL DISASTER MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY

New Delhi, the 26th December, 2019

S.O. 2224.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 7 of the Disaster Management

Act 2005 (53 of 2005), the term of the Advisory Committee of National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA)

comprising15 Members constituted vide notification No.2801 dated 29.11.2016, is extended upto 27.11.2020.

The Members of the Advisory Committee shall be paid such travelling allowances, room rent, daily allowances

and conveyance allowance, as are admissible to a Member of the High Power Committee as specified in Appendix-2 to

Supplementary Rule 190.

[ F. No. 8-1/2018-Cdn/NDMA]

G.V.V. SARMA, Member Secy.

कोयला मंालय

नई द ली, 1 जनवरी, 2020

का

का. . . . आ. . . . 2225

2225

2225.—केj ीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक ;े< (अज+न और िवकास) अिधिनयम, 1957 (1957 का 20) (

िजसे इसम इसके पB चात् उ त अिधिनयम कहा गया है ) क$ धारा 4 क$ उपधारा (1) के अधीन भारत सरकार के कोयला

मं<ालय )ारा जारी क$ गई अिधसूचना संi यांक का. आ. 1620, तारीख 29 अगत, 2019, जो भारत के राजप<, भाग II,

खw ड 3, उप-खw ड (ii), तारीख 7 िसतV बर, 2019 म Xकािशत क$ गई थी, उस अिधसूचना से उपाबx अनुसूची म िविनeद{ ट

प:र;े< क$ भूिम म िजसका माप 685.000 हे टेयर (लगभग) या 1692.635 एकड़ (लगभग) है, कोयले का पूव3;ण करने के

अपने आशय क$ सूचना दी थी;

और केj ीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है क इस अिधसूचना से संल~ न अनुसूची म वणत उ त भूिम के भाग

म कोयला अिभXा\ त है;

अत:, अब, केj ीय सरकार उ त अिधिनयम क$ धारा 7 क$ उप-धारा (1) )ारा Xद त शि तयZ का Xयोग करते Sए,

इससे संल~ न अनुसूची म व€णत 685.000 हे टेयर (लगभग) या 1692.635 एकड़ (लगभग) माप वाली भूिम म या उस पर

के सभी अिधकार का अज+न करने के अपने आशय क$ सूचना देती है;

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 4] 2020@IkkS"k 14] 1941

8245

/ट0 प

/ट0 पण

ण

ण 1 :

1 :

1 : इस अिधसूचना के अधीन आने वाले ;े< के रेखांक धारक संi यांक ओसीपीएल/ सीओ/15-सीबीए, तारीख

4 नवVबर, 2019 का िनरी;ण कले टर, िजला –सुjदरगढ़, ओिडशा के काया+लय म या कोयला िनयं<क, 1, काउंिसल हाउस

gीट, कोलकाता- 700 001 के काया+लय म या मुiय काय+कारी अिधकारी, ओिडशा कोल एwड पावर िलिमटेड, जोन-ए,

6ाउंड ƒलोर, फोर„यून टाव+स+, भुबने…र -751023, ओिडशा के काया+लय म कया जा सकता है ।

/ट0 प

/ट0 पण

ण

ण 2 :

2 :

2 : उ त अिधिनयम क$ उपधारा 8 के उपबंधZ क$ ओर Q यान आकृ{ ट कया जाता है, िजसम िनV निलिखत उपबंध है :-

“8

“8 अज न के बाबत् आपि4 त

अज न के बाबत् आपि4 त

अज न के बाबत् आपि4 तयॉ

यॉ

यॉ.-(1) कोई y यि त जो कसी भूिम म, िजसक$ बाबत् धारा 7 के अधीन अिधसूचना जारी क$ गई

है, िहतबx है, अिधसूचना के जारी कए जाने से तीस दन के भीतर सV पूण+ भूिम या उसके कसी भाग या ऐसी भूिम म या उस

पर के कj हL अिधकारZ का अज+न कए जाने के बारे म आपि त कर सकेगा ।

5 प

5 प6 टी

6 टी

6 टीकरण

करण

करण.-इस धारा के अंतग+त यह आपि त नहL मानी जाएगी, क कोई y यि त कसी भूिम म कोयला उ पादन के िलए

वयं खनन संbयाएं करना चाहता है और ऐसी संbयाएं केj ीय सरकार या कसी अj य y यि त को नहL करनी चािहए।

उप-धारा (1) के अधीन X येक आपि त स;म Xािधकारी को िलिखत Cप म क$ जाएगी और स;म Xािधकारी,

आपि तकता+ को या तो वयं सुने जाने, या िविध y यवसायी )ारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसी सभी आपि तयZ को सुनने

के पB चात् और ऐसी और जांच, यद कोई हो, जो वह आवB यक समझता है, करने के पB चात् वह या तो धारा 7 क$ उपधारा

(1) के अधीन अिधसूिचत भूिम के या ऐसी भूिम म या उस पर के अिधकारZ के संबंध म एक :रपोट+ या ऐसी भूिम के िविभj न

टुकड़Z या ऐसी भूिम म या उस पर के अिधकारZ के संबंध म आपि तयZ पर अपनी िसफा:रशZ और उसके )ारा क$ गई

काय+वाही के अिभलेख सिहत िविभj न :रपोट+ केjीय सरकार को उसके िविनB चय के िलए देगा ।

(3)

इस धारा के XयोजनZ के िलए वह y यि त कसी भूिम म िहतबx समझा जाएगा जो Xितकर म िहत का दावा करने

का हकदार हो, यद भूिम या कसी ऐसी भूिम म या उस पर के अिधकार इस अिधिनयम के अधीन अजत कर िलए जाते है ।”

/ट0 प

/ट0 पण 3

ण 3

ण 3: केj ीय सरकार ने उ त अिधिनयम क$ धारा 3 के अधीन कोयला िनयं<क, 1, काउंिसल हाउस gीट, कोलकाता -

700 001 को अिधसूचना संi या का. आ. 878, तारीख 28 मई, 1989, जो भारत के राजप<, भाग II, खंड 3, उपखंड (ii) म

तारीख 1 जून, 2019 म Xकािशत क$ गयी थी, )ारा स;म Xािधकारी िनयु त कया है ।

अनुसूची

डीप साइड मनोहरपुर कोयला hलॉक

आई.बी. वैली कोलफ$ˆस

िजला सुjदरगढ़, रा,य -ओिडशा

[ रेखांक धारक संi यांक ओसीपीएल/ सीओ/15-सीबीए, तारीख 4 नवVबर, 2019]

सभी अिधकार:

(क)

राज5व भूिम:

b.सं.

6ाम का नाम

6ाम संiया/

थाना संiया

पटवारी/

राजव

सeकल

का नाम

तहसील

िजला

;े< हे टेयर

म

(लगभग)

:ट\पिणयां

दुCबागा

हेमिगर

सुjदरगढ़

12.440

भाग

कटाराबागा

हेमिगर

सुjदरगढ़

62.416

भाग

काथाफली

108

घुमुदासन

हेमिगर

सुjदरगढ़

208.157

भाग

परमानंदपुर

107

घुमुदासन

हेमिगर

सुjदरगढ़

123.221

भाग

कुल: 406.234 हे टेयर (लगभग) या 1003.804 एकड़ (लगभग)

8246

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 4, 2020/PAUSHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(ख)

वन भूिम:

b.सं.

6ाम का नाम

6ाम संiया/

थाना संiया

पटवारी/

राजव

सeकल

का नाम

तहसील

िजला

;े< हे टेयर

म

(लगभग)

:ट\पिणयां

दुCबागा

हेमिगर

सुjदरगढ़

29.080

भाग

कातरबागा

हेमिगर

सुjदरगढ़

24.127

भाग

काथाफली

108

घुमुदासन

हेमिगर

सुjदरगढ़

18.632

भाग

परमानंदपुर

107

घुमुदासन

हेमिगर

सुjदरगढ़

30.342

भाग

काहनुपहाड़

आरि;त वन

हेमिगर

सुjदरगढ़

10.517

भाग

Sjडरखोल

आरि;त वन

हेमिगर

सुjदरगढ़

166.068

भाग

कुल: 278.766 हे टेयर (लगभग) या 688.831 एकड़ (लगभग)

(क)

कुल राजव भूिम: 406.234 हे टेयर (लगभग) या 1003.804 एकड़ (लगभग)

(ख)

कुल वन भूिम: 278.766 हे टेयर (लगभग) या 688.831 एकड़ (लगभग)

(ग)

कुल जोड़ (क + ख): 685.000 हे टेयर (लगभग) या 1692.635 एकड़ (लगभग)

अजत कए जाने वाले राजव \लाट संiयांकZ क$ सूची:

1. 6ाम – दुCबागा :

1137 (भाग), 1139 (भाग), 1272, 1270 (भाग), 1294/1676, 1294/1680, 1294/1681, 1294/1682,

1294/1683, 1294/1684, 1294, 1138 (भाग), 1269 (भाग), 1140 (भाग), 1294/1685, 1282/2012,

1282/2015,

1282/2017,

1282/2018,

1282/2019,

1282/2020,

1282/2021,

1282/2036,

1282/2036/2082, 1282, 1277, 1278, 1279, 1290, 1280/2/1513 (भाग), 1280/1/1514 (भाग), 1311 (भाग),

2036/2089, 2036/2090; 1313 (भाग), 1134, 1266 (भाग), 1301, 1305, 1307, 1371 (भाग) , 1265, 1281,

1292, 1367 (भाग), 1262 (भाग), 1274, 1276, 1297, 1299, 1302, 1303, 1309, 1365, 1368 (भाग) ।

2. ;ाम

2. ;ाम – कातरबागा

कातरबागा

कातरबागा : : : :

39 (भाग), 40 (भाग), 71 (भाग), 76 (भाग), 77 (भाग), 103, 103/592, 104, 105, 105/455, 106, 107,

107/365, 107/431, 107/431/496, 107/432, 107/432/497, 108, 108/461, 109, 109/428, 428/452,

109/459, 111, 111/451, 111/429, 111/430, 112, 112/427, 116, 116/470, 116/471, 116/472, 116/473,

116/474, 116/475, 116/476, 118, 119, 120, 120/518, 120/530, 120/544, 120/552, 120/555, 555/570,

121, 121/443, 122, 123, 124, 124/519, 124/531, 124/545, 125, 126, 127, 128, 128/403, 128/421,

128/422, 128/422/488, 128/423, 128/426, 128/426/440, 129, 129/442, 129/434, 434/441, 130,

130/468, 130/468/580, 130/468/585, 131 (भाग), 132 (भाग), 134 (भाग), 135, 135/575, 135/576,

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 4] 2020@IkkS"k 14] 1941

8247

135/581, 135/582, 135/582/623, 135/583, 136, 136/439, 136/485, 136/486, 137, 137/436, 138, 139,

139/584, 140, 140/469, 141, 141/580, 141/484, 142, 142/596, 596/604, 142/602, 143, 144, 145,

146, 146/465, 146/466, 146/467, 146/487, 147, 147/437, 147/462, 147/463, 147/464, 147/499,

147/500, 150/615, 150/617, 150, 151, 151/454, 151/454/628, 151/458, 152 (भाग), 153 (भाग), 154

(भाग), 163 (भाग), 164 (भाग), 166 (भाग), 252 (भाग), 252/341 (भाग), 253 (भाग), 254, 254/372,

254/372/610, 254/373, 373/618, 254/374, 255, 255/489, 255/490, 255/490/557, 255/444/491,

255/444, 256, 257 (भाग) , 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 265, 266, 266/594, 266/595, 267, 268/375,

269, 270, 271, 271/507, 271/390, 272, 273, 274, 274/438, 276 (भाग), 278 (भाग), 288 (भाग), 289

(भाग), 290 (भाग), 291, 293 (भाग), 294, 294/410, 299, 300, 301, 301/605, 301/606, 301/607, 301/608,

302, 303, 305, 310, 310/502, 311, 311/503, 311/571, 311/572, 311/573, 311/574, 312, 312/479,

312/480, 312/481, 312/482, 312/483, 312/479/578, 312/480/579, 313, 318, 319, 327/377 (भाग),

242; 49 (भाग) , 97 (भाग) , 98 (भाग) , 98/331, 99, 100, 101, 102, 110, 113, 114, 115, 117, 124/329,

148, 149, 264, 268, 275 (भाग) , 284 (भाग) , 285 (भाग), 296, 297, 304, 306, 308, 309, 314, 315, 316,

320, 272/376, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 328।

3. ;ाम

;ाम

;ाम – काथाफली:

काथाफली:

124, 28, 59, 62, 67, 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 99, 102, 108, 110, 118, 125, 127, 135, 136, 148, 153, 167,

168, 172, 185, 191, 192, 202, 207, 217, 219, 220, 222, 236, 237, 207/340, 93/348, 106/350,

155/361, 193/365, 91/382, 91/383, 91/384, 91/385, 99/386, 99/387, 89, 90, 105, 107, 132, 130,

164, 213 (भाग) , 138, 128, 32, 33, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 84, 86, 87, 243, 76/347, 111, 13, 47, 49, 179,

101, 208 (भाग), 69, 72, 94, 29/333, 31/337, 183, 180, 181, 182, 186, 203, 184/339, 147/357,

202/367, 244, 214 (भाग), 226/512, 246/513, 247/514, 233/520, 273 (भाग), 143, 19, 20, 21, 22, 120,

140/352, 195, 196 (भाग), 197, 198, 194, 140, 144, 139, 140/353, 205, 206, 131, 395/539, 395/540,

395/541, 395/542,188/395, 177/1/389, 91/390, 91/391, 93/392, 99/393, 177/402, 177/398, 177/399,

177/400, 177/401, 16, 50, 12/405, 8/407, 10/408, 11/409, 14/410, 9/418, 177/427, 177/419,

177/420, 177/421, 177/422, 177/423, 177/424, 215 (भाग), 216, 177/426, 177/428, 177/429,

177/430, 177/431, 65, 65/543, 543/546, 65/544, 544/547, 65/545545/548, 103, 106, 109, 114, 115,

126, 152, 184, 221, 223, 223/343, 39, 41, 150, 104, 113, 65/432, 101/433, 103/434, 106/435,

109/436, 114/437, 115/438, 126/439, 52/440, 21/441, 23/442, 42, 39/443,150/444, 37, 121, 190,

99/394, 37/445, 36, 98, 158, 193, 241, 91/395, 37/446, 190/447, 121/448, 99/449, 127/450, 88,

88/538, 145, 33/451, 34, 176/452, 177/455,177/456,177/457, 177/458, 177/459, 177/460, 177/461,

177/462, 177/463, 177/464, 177/465, 177/466, 177/467, 177/468, 177/469, 176/470, 157/473,

35/472, 85, 85/471, 240, 35/474, 32/335, 82, 149, 201, 236/371, 21/475, 475/482, 37/476, 81/477,

8248

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 4, 2020/PAUSHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

86/478, 243/479, 173, 176/480, 76, 76/495, 176/481, 147, 68, 69/483, 73/484, 74, 75, 72/485, 73,

241/486, 241/487, 98/488, 98/489, 98/490, 432/491, 432/492, 65/493, 176/494, 176, 96/496,

237/497, 80/498, 80/499, 96/500, 237/505, 78/506, 19/507, 237/508, 217/509, 19/511, 233/515,

224, 226/521, 226 (भाग), 232, 234/516, 226/522, 231/517, 234, 225, 231, 342/518, 235, 217/342,

64, 230/523, 233 (भाग), 246 (भाग), 247, 28/334, 194/524, 129, 129/525, 141, 244/526, 136/354,

244/528, 354/530, 244/531, 363/533, 244/534, 128/363, 188/395/536, 227, 369; 7, 31, 40, 43, 44,

45, 160, 166, 169, 170, 177, 218, 188/364, 66, 71, 95, 100, 112, 119, 122, 123, 133, 134, 137, 142,

146, 171, 69/346, 120/351, 142/355, 142/356, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 25, 26, 29, 32, 35, 38, 48,

52, 53, 54, 56, 61, 70, 83, 116, 117, 154, 157, 159, 161, 162, 163, 174, 200, 204, 276, 184/341,

59/344, 65/345, 97/349, 149/358, 86/359, 87/360, 160/362, 193/366, 202/368, 239/372, 243/373, 1,

4, 6, 23, 30, 46, 51 (भाग) , 58, 63, 151, 155, 165, 188 (भाग), 199, 210, 238, 242 (भाग), 245, 277

(भाग), 284 (भाग), 37/338, 5.

4. ;ाम

4. ;ाम – परमानंदपुर:

परमानंदपुर:

74, 90, 113, 115, 117, 149, 150, 167, 173, 175, 189, 192, 201, 205, 211, 214, 215, 216, 221, 224,

225, 226, 232, 248, 249, 250, 254, 255, 258, 259, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 273, 59, 61, 63, 66, 69,

70, 75, 76, 89, 91, 96, 141, 207, 18, 19, 29, 31, 157, 157/408, 408/412, 157/409, 17, 20, 21, 24, 25,

26, 30, 12, 16, 22, 23, 27, 32, 80, 118, 137, 138, 140, 170, 171, 133/281, 136/283, 178/297, 109,

116, 121, 122, 123, 124, 130, 217, 219, 46, 50, 51, 62, 85, 88, 95, 99, 100, 102, 103, 160, 162,

163, 165, 206, 209, 267, 137/285, 45/386, 92/388, 94, 97, 154/382, 179/294/298, 179/294/299,

179/294/300, 179/294/301, 179/294/302, 5, 7, 10, 15, 28, 132, 127/304, 146, 131, 143/305,

294/306, 218/307, 218, 297/308, 297/308/377, 90/310, 115/311, 149/313, 173/314, 175/315,

226/316, 229, 230, 231, 239/317, 250/318, 250/319, 259/320, 259/321, 259/322, 264/323, 266/324,

242/293, 211/326, 215/327, 215/328, 216/329, 220, 270, 221/330, 90/332, 115/333, 149/335,

167/336, 173/337, 226/338, 227, 228, 238, 239/339, 250/340, 257, 259/341, 260, 265/342,

266/343, 270/344, 192/346, 193/347, 205/348, 211/349, 214/350, 215/351, 215/352, 216/353,

259/375, 115/355, 173/357, 192/359, 193/360, 239/361, 240, 256, 264/364, 266/365, 215/367,

215/368, 216/369, 225/371, 226/372, 73, 270/373, 117/356, 74/354, 270/374, 133, 74/309,

117/334, 74/331, 170/376, 250/362, 259/363, 211/366, 119, 120, 139, 111, 45, 154/381, 164, 208,

92, 98, 101, 154/383, 137/284, 44, 54, 154/384, 156, 202, 136, 158, 204/389, 268/391, 269, 154,

155, 159, 204/390, 268, 45/387, 47, 87, 93, 107, 110, 154/385, 204, 166/288, 268/392, 70/393,

74/394, 394/411, 152, 152/413, 303/398, 135, 152/397, 131/303, 151/287, 153, 157/399, 311/400,

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 4] 2020@IkkS"k 14] 1941

8249

133/401, 133/402, 86, 117/312, 133/403, 133/404, 133/405,133/406, 133/407, 221/370/410,

221/370, 182; 161, 178, 179, 180 (भाग) , 188, 191, 194, 196, 199, 241, 243, 179/294, 179/296, 84,

169, 172, 174, 195, 198, 200, 203, 210, 222, 242, 278, 215/292, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 36, 38, 42,

43, 48, 49, 52, 53, 55, 56, 57, 58, 71, 72, 77, 106, 134, 142, 143, 145, 147, 148, 151, 181 (भाग) ,

184 (भाग) , 185, 186, 187, 190, 197, 212, 213, 223, 235, 236, 237, 246, 247, 251, 252, 253, 261,

271, 272, 274, 20/276, 66/277, 86/279, 89/280, 133/282, 149/286, 173/289, 175/290, 193/291, 1,

33, 125, 128, 129, 127.

अजत कए जाने वाले वन केडेgल सव3 के \लाट संiयांकZ क$ सूची:

1. ;ाम

1. ;ाम – दुबागा :

दुबागा :

1267 (भाग) , 1372 (भाग) , 1132 (भाग) , 1245 (भाग) , 1263 (भाग) , 1264, (भाग) , 1271 (भाग) , 1273,

1275, 1280 (भाग) , 1283, 1284, 1285, 1286, 1287, 1288, 1289, 1291, 1293, 1295, 1296, 1298,

1300, 1304, 1306, 1308, 1310 (भाग) , 1364 (भाग) , 1366, 1349 (भाग) , 1145 (भाग) , 1165 (भाग) , 1255

(भाग) , 1135, 1133 (भाग) , 1136, 1308/01, 1308/02.

2. 6ाम – कातरबागा: 38 (भाग) , 277 (भाग) , 286 (भाग) , 292 (भाग) , 295 (भाग) , 298, 307, 317, 327 (भाग)

3. 6ाम – काथाफली: 2, 3, 55, 60, 239, 17, 18, 24, 27, 57, 156, 175, 178, 187, 189, 37/336.

4. 6ाम परमानंदपुर : 244, 275(भाग) , 179/295 (भाग) , 2, 3, 34, 35, 37, 39, 40, 41, 60, 64, 65, 67, 68, 78,

79, 81, 82, 83, 104, 105, 108, 112, 114, 126, 144, 166, 168, 176, 177, 183 (भाग) , 233, 234, 245

(भाग).

5. Sjडरखोल आरि;त वन.

6. कहानुपहाड़ आरि;त वन.

सीमा वण न

सीमा वण न: : : :

सgल माइन \लाrनग एwड िडजाइन इjटी„यूट (सीएमपीडीआई) )ारा तैयार क$ गई िजयोलॉिजकल :रपोट+ से वड+

िजयोडे:टक िसटम (डhयूजीएस) 84 डेटम लाइन और यूिनवस+ल gांसवस+ मक3टर (यूटीएम) Xोजे शन Xणाली के साथ डीप

साइड मनोहरपुर कोयला hलॉक क$ सीमा।

रेखा 1-2 : टेशन ‘1’ से Xारंभ होने वाली सीमा कातरबागा 6ाम म डीप साइड मनोहरपुर कोयला hलॉक के उYर-पि‰मी

कोने पर िथत है और पूव+ दशा क$ ओर जाती है और कातरबागा और दुŠबागा 6ामZ क$ सामाjय 6ाम क$ सीमा को छूती है।

फर सीमा दुCबागा 6ाम म Xवेश करती है, दुŠबागा-परमानंदपुर के 6ाम क$ सड़क से गुजरती है, फर पूव+ क$ ओर चलती है

और \लॉट संiया 1349 दुŠबागा 6ाम क$ (उYरी सीमा) के अंदर टेशन ’2' के पूवPYर कोने म िमलती है ।

8250

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 4, 2020/PAUSHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

रेखा 2-3 : रेखा टेशन ’2’ से Xारंभ होती है और दि;ण दशा क$ ओर चलती है और परमानंदपुर 6ाम और कहानुपहाड़

आरि;त वन क$ सामाjय सीमा को छूती है । सीमा कहानुपहाड़ आरि;त वन म Xवेश करती है और कहानुपहाड़ आरि;त

वन काथाफली 6ाम क$ सामाjय सीमा को छूती है। फर सीमा काथाफली 6ाम म Xवेश करती है और टेशन ‘3’ पर िमलती

है अथा+त् दि;ण-पूव+ कोने का टेशन, राजव \लाट संiया - 277 (पूवc सीमा) के अंदर । पूवc सीमा ‘मनोहरपुर’ कोयला

hलॉक तक सीिमत है।

रेखा 3-4 : रेखा टेशन ’3’ से Xारंभ होती है और पि‰म दशा क$ ओर चलती है, काथाफली 6ाम और Sjडरखोल आरि;त

वन क$ सामाjय सीमा को छूती है और टेशन ‘4’ के दि;ण-पि‰म कोने का टेशन (दि;णी सीमा) से िमलती है।

रेखा 4-1 : रेखा टेशन ’4’ से Xांरभ होती है और उYर दशा क$ ओर चलती है, Sjडरखोल आरि;त वन कातरबागा 6ाम क$

सामाjय सीमा को छूती है, फर सीमा कातरबागा 6ाम म Xवेश करती है और टेशन से ‘1’ के उYर-पूव+ कोने का टेशन

(पि‰मी सीमा) को पूरा करती है ।

[ फा. सं. 43015/13/2019–एलए एwड आईआर ]

राम िशरोमिण सरोज, उप सिचव

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi, the 1st January, 2020

S.O. 2225.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry Coal number S.O. 1620, dated

the 29^th August, 2019 issued under sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and

Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), and published in the Gazette of India, Part

II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), dated the 7^th September, 2019, the Central Government gave notice of its intention to

prospect for coal in 685.000 hectares (approximately) or 1692.635 acres (approximately) of the lands in the locality

specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification;

And whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable in a part of the said lands prescribed in the

Schedule appended to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 7 of the said Act, the Central

Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire the land measuring 685.000 hectares (approximately) or

1692.635 acres (approximately) and all rights in or over the said lands described in the Schedule appended hereto;

Note 1: The plan bearing number OCPL/CO/15-CBA, dated the 4^th November, 2019 of the area covered by this

notification may be inspected in the office of the Collector, District - Sundergarh, Odisha or in the office of the Coal

Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata 700001, or in the office of the Chief Executive Officer, Odisha Coal and

Power Limited, Zone-A, Ground floor, Fortune Towers, Bhubaneswar - 751023, Odisha.

Note 2: Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of section 8 of the said Act which provides as follows: -

“8. Objection to acquisition.- (1) Any person interested in any land in respect of which a notification under section 7

has been issued may, within thirty days of the issue of the notification, object to the acquisition of the whole or any part

of the land or any rights in or over such land.

Explanation.- It shall not be an objection within the meaning of this section for any person to say that he himself desires

to undertake mining operation in the land for the production of coal and that such operations should not be undertaken by

the Central Government or by any other person.

(2) Every objection under sub-section (1) shall be made to the competent authority in writing, and the competent

authority shall give the objector an opportunity of being heard either in person or by a legal practitioner and shall, after

hearing all such objections and after making such further inquiry, if any, as he thinks necessary, either make a report in

respect of the land which has been notified under sub-section (1) of section 7 or of rights in or over such land, or make

different reports in respect of different parcels of such land or of rights in or over such land, to the Central Government,

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 4] 2020@IkkS"k 14] 1941

8251

containing his recommendations on the objections, together with the record of the proceedings held by him, for the

decision of that Government.

(3) For the purposes of this section, a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitled to claim an

interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under this Act”.

Note 3 : The Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata -700001 has been appointed by the Central Government

as the competent authority under section 3 of the said Act, vide notification number S.O. 878, dated the 28^th May, 2019,

published in Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) of the Gazette of India, dated the 1^st June, 2019.

SCHEDULE

Dip Side Manoharpur Coal Block

IB Valley Coalfields

District Sundargarh, State- Odisha

[Plan bearing number OCPL/CO/15-CBA, dated the 4^th November, 2019 ]

ALL RIGHTS:

(A)

REVENUE LAND:

Sl.

No.

Name of Village

Village

number/

Thana

number

Patwari/

Revenue Circle

Name

Tahsil

District

Area in hectares

(approxi-

mately)

Remarks

Durubaga

Hemgir

Sundargarh

12.440

Part

Katarbaga

Hemgir

Sundargarh

62.416

Part

Kathafali

108

Ghumudasan

Hemgir

Sundargarh

208.157

Part

Paramanandpur

107

Ghumudasan

Hemgir

Sundargarh

123.221

Part

Total: 406.234 hectares (approximately)

or 1003.804 acres(approximately)

(B)

FOREST LAND:

Sl.

No.

Name of Village

Village

number/

Thana

number

Patwari/

Revenue Circle

Name

Tahsil

District

Area in

hectares

(approxi-

mately)

Remarks

Durubaga

Hemgir

Sundargarh

29.080

Part

Katarbaga

Hemgir

Sundargarh

24.127

Part

Kathafali

108

Ghumudasan

Hemgir

Sundargarh

18.632

Part

Paramanandpur

107

Ghumudasan

Hemgir

Sundargarh

30.342

Part

Kahnupahad RF

Hemgir

Sundargarh

10.517

Part

Hundarkhol RF

Hemgir

Sundargarh

166.068

Part

Total : 278.766 hectares (approximately)

or 688.831 acres(approximately)

SUMMERY:

(A)

Total Revenue Land

: 406.234 hectares (approximately) or 1003.804 acres

(approximately)

(B)

Total Forest Land

: 278.766 hectares (approximately) or 688.831 acres

(approximately)

(C)

Grand Total (A+B)

: 685.000 hectares (approximately) or 1692.635 acres

(approximately)

8252

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 4, 2020/PAUSHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

LIST OF REVENUE PLOT NUMBERS TO BE ACQUIRED:

Village – Durubaga:

1137 (Part), 1139 (Part), 1272, 1270 (Part), 1294/1676, 1294/1680, 1294/1681, 1294/1682, 1294/1683, 1294/1684, 1294,

1138 (Part), 1269 (Part), 1140 (Part), 1294/1685, 1282/2012, 1282/2015, 1282/2017, 1282/2018, 1282/2019, 1282/2020,

1282/2021, 1282/2036, 1282/2036/2082, 1282, 1277, 1278, 1279, 1290, 1280/2/1513 (Part), 1280/1/1514 (P), 1311

(Part), 2036/2089, 2036/2090; 1313 (Part), 1134, 1266 (Part), 1301, 1305, 1307, 1371 (Part), 1265, 1281, 1292, 1367

(Part), 1262 (Part), 1274, 1276, 1297, 1299, 1302, 1303, 1309, 1365, 1368 (Part).

Village – Katarbaga:

39 (Part), 40 (Part), 71 (Part), 76 (Part), 77 (Part), 103, 103/592, 104, 105, 105/455, 106, 107, 107/365, 107/431,

107/431/496, 107/432, 107/432/497, 108, 108/461, 109, 109/428, 428/452, 109/459, 111, 111/451, 111/429, 111/430,

112, 112/427, 116, 116/470, 116/471, 116/472, 116/473, 116/474, 116/475, 116/476, 118, 119, 120, 120/518, 120/530,

120/544, 120/552, 120/555, 555/570, 121, 121/443, 122, 123, 124, 124/519, 124/531, 124/545, 125, 126, 127, 128,

128/403, 128/421, 128/422, 128/422/488, 128/423, 128/426, 128/426/440, 129, 129/442, 129/434, 434/441, 130,

130/468, 130/468/580, 130/468/585, 131 (Part), 132 (Part), 134 (Part), 135, 135/575, 135/576, 135/581, 135/582,

135/582/623, 135/583, 136, 136/439, 136/485, 136/486, 137, 137/436, 138, 139, 139/584, 140, 140/469, 141, 141/580,

141/484, 142, 142/596, 596/604, 142/602, 143, 144, 145, 146, 146/465, 146/466, 146/467, 146/487, 147, 147/437,

147/462, 147/463, 147/464, 147/499, 147/500, 150/615, 150/617, 150, 151, 151/454, 151/454/628, 151/458, 152 (Part),

153 (Part), 154 (Part), 163 (Part), 164 (Part), 166 (Part), 252 (Part), 252/341 (Part), 253 (Part), 254, 254/372,

254/372/610, 254/373, 373/618, 254/374, 255, 255/489, 255/490, 255/490/557, 255/444/491, 255/444, 256, 257 (Part),

258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 265, 266, 266/594, 266/595, 267, 268/375, 269, 270, 271, 271/507, 271/390, 272, 273, 274,

274/438, 276 (Part), 278 (Part), 288 (Part), 289 (Part), 290 (Part), 291, 293 (Part), 294, 294/410, 299, 300, 301, 301/605,

301/606, 301/607, 301/608, 302, 303, 305, 310, 310/502, 311, 311/503, 311/571, 311/572, 311/573, 311/574, 312,

312/479, 312/480, 312/481, 312/482, 312/483, 312/479/578, 312/480/579, 313, 318, 319, 327/377 (Part), 242; 49 (Part),

97 (Part), 98 (Part), 98/331, 99, 100, 101, 102, 110, 113, 114, 115, 117, 124/329, 148, 149, 264, 268, 275 (Part), 284

(Part), 285 (Part), 296, 297, 304, 306, 308, 309, 314, 315, 316, 320, 272/376, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 328.

Village – Kathaphali:

124, 28, 59, 62, 67, 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 99, 102, 108, 110, 118, 125, 127, 135, 136, 148, 153, 167, 168, 172, 185, 191,

192, 202, 207, 217, 219, 220, 222, 236, 237, 207/340, 93/348, 106/350, 155/361, 193/365, 91/382, 91/383, 91/384,

91/385, 99/386, 99/387, 89, 90, 105, 107, 132, 130, 164, 213 (Part), 138, 128, 32, 33, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 84, 86, 87, 243,

76/347, 111, 13, 47, 49, 179, 101, 208 (Part), 69, 72, 94, 29/333, 31/337, 183, 180, 181, 182, 186, 203, 184/339, 147/357,

202/367, 244, 214 (Part), 226/512, 246/513, 247/514, 233/520, 273 (Part), 143, 19, 20, 21, 22, 120, 140/352, 195, 196

(Part), 197, 198, 194, 140, 144, 139, 140/353, 205, 206, 131, 395/539, 395/540, 395/541, 395/542,188/395, 177/1/389,

91/390, 91/391, 93/392, 99/393, 177/402, 177/398, 177/399, 177/400, 177/401, 16, 50, 12/405, 8/407, 10/408, 11/409,

14/410, 9/418, 177/427, 177/419, 177/420, 177/421, 177/422, 177/423, 177/424, 215 (Part), 216, 177/426, 177/428,

177/429, 177/430, 177/431, 65, 65/543, 543/546, 65/544, 544/547, 65/545545/548, 103, 106, 109, 114, 115, 126, 152,

184, 221, 223, 223/343, 39, 41, 150, 104, 113, 65/432, 101/433, 103/434, 106/435, 109/436, 114/437, 115/438, 126/439,

52/440, 21/441, 23/442, 42, 39/443,150/444, 37, 121, 190, 99/394, 37/445, 36, 98, 158, 193, 241, 91/395, 37/446,

190/447, 121/448, 99/449, 127/450, 88, 88/538, 145, 33/451, 34, 176/452, 177/455,177/456,177/457, 177/458, 177/459,

177/460, 177/461, 177/462, 177/463, 177/464, 177/465, 177/466, 177/467, 177/468, 177/469, 176/470, 157/473, 35/472,

85, 85/471, 240, 35/474, 32/335, 82, 149, 201, 236/371, 21/475, 475/482, 37/476, 81/477, 86/478, 243/479, 173,

176/480, 76, 76/495, 176/481, 147, 68, 69/483, 73/484, 74, 75, 72/485, 73, 241/486, 241/487, 98/488, 98/489, 98/490,

432/491, 432/492, 65/493, 176/494, 176, 96/496, 237/497, 80/498, 80/499, 96/500, 237/505, 78/506, 19/507, 237/508,

217/509, 19/511, 233/515, 224, 226/521, 226 (Part), 232, 234/516, 226/522, 231/517, 234, 225, 231, 342/518, 235,

217/342, 64, 230/523, 233 (P), 246 (Part), 247, 28/334, 194/524, 129, 129/525, 141, 244/526, 136/354, 244/528,

354/530, 244/531, 363/533, 244/534, 128/363, 188/395/536, 227, 369; 7, 31, 40, 43, 44, 45, 160, 166, 169, 170, 177,

218, 188/364, 66, 71, 95, 100, 112, 119, 122, 123, 133, 134, 137, 142, 146, 171, 69/346, 120/351, 142/355, 142/356, 8, 9,

10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 25, 26, 29, 32, 35, 38, 48, 52, 53, 54, 56, 61, 70, 83, 116, 117, 154, 157, 159, 161, 162, 163, 174, 200,

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 4] 2020@IkkS"k 14] 1941

8253

204, 276, 184/341, 59/344, 65/345, 97/349, 149/358, 86/359, 87/360, 160/362, 193/366, 202/368, 239/372, 243/373, 1, 4,

6, 23, 30, 46, 51 (Part), 58, 63, 151, 155, 165, 188 (Part), 199, 210, 238, 242 (Part), 245, 277 (Part), 284 (Part), 37/338, 5.

Village – Paramanandapur:

74, 90, 113, 115, 117, 149, 150, 167, 173, 175, 189, 192, 201, 205, 211, 214, 215, 216, 221, 224, 225, 226, 232, 248,

249, 250, 254, 255, 258, 259, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 273, 59, 61, 63, 66, 69, 70, 75, 76, 89, 91, 96, 141, 207, 18, 19,

29, 31, 157, 157/408, 408/412, 157/409, 17, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 30, 12, 16, 22, 23, 27, 32, 80, 118, 137, 138, 140, 170,

171, 133/281, 136/283, 178/297, 109, 116, 121, 122, 123, 124, 130, 217, 219, 46, 50, 51, 62, 85, 88, 95, 99, 100, 102,

103, 160, 162, 163, 165, 206, 209, 267, 137/285, 45/386, 92/388, 94, 97, 154/382, 179/294/298, 179/294/299,

179/294/300, 179/294/301, 179/294/302, 5, 7, 10, 15, 28, 132, 127/304, 146, 131, 143/305, 294/306, 218/307, 218,

297/308, 297/308/377, 90/310, 115/311, 149/313, 173/314, 175/315, 226/316, 229, 230, 231, 239/317, 250/318, 250/319,

259/320, 259/321, 259/322, 264/323, 266/324, 242/293, 211/326, 215/327, 215/328, 216/329, 220, 270, 221/330, 90/332,

115/333, 149/335, 167/336, 173/337, 226/338, 227, 228, 238, 239/339, 250/340, 257, 259/341, 260, 265/342, 266/343,

270/344, 192/346, 193/347, 205/348, 211/349, 214/350, 215/351, 215/352, 216/353, 259/375, 115/355, 173/357,

192/359, 193/360, 239/361, 240, 256, 264/364, 266/365, 215/367, 215/368, 216/369, 225/371, 226/372, 73, 270/373,

117/356, 74/354, 270/374, 133, 74/309, 117/334, 74/331, 170/376, 250/362, 259/363, 211/366, 119, 120, 139, 111, 45,

154/381, 164, 208, 92, 98, 101, 154/383, 137/284, 44, 54, 154/384, 156, 202, 136, 158, 204/389, 268/391, 269, 154, 155,

159, 204/390, 268, 45/387, 47, 87, 93, 107, 110, 154/385, 204, 166/288, 268/392, 70/393, 74/394, 394/411, 152,

152/413, 303/398, 135, 152/397, 131/303, 151/287, 153, 157/399, 311/400, 133/401, 133/402, 86, 117/312, 133/403,

133/404, 133/405,133/406, 133/407, 221/370/410, 221/370, 182; 161, 178, 179, 180 (Part), 188, 191, 194, 196, 199,

241, 243, 179/294, 179/296, 84, 169, 172, 174, 195, 198, 200, 203, 210, 222, 242, 278, 215/292, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 36,

38, 42, 43, 48, 49, 52, 53, 55, 56, 57, 58, 71, 72, 77, 106, 134, 142, 143, 145, 147, 148, 151, 181 (Part), 184 (Part), 185,

186, 187, 190, 197, 212, 213, 223, 235, 236, 237, 246, 247, 251, 252, 253, 261, 271, 272, 274, 20/276, 66/277, 86/279,

89/280, 133/282, 149/286, 173/289, 175/290, 193/291, 1, 33, 125, 128, 129, 127.

List of Forest Cadastral Survey Plot numbers to be acquired:

Village – Durubaga:

1267 (Part), 1372 (Part), 1132 (Part), 1245 (Part), 1263 (Part), 1264, (Part), 1271 (Part), 1273, 1275, 1280 (Part), 1283,

1284, 1285, 1286, 1287, 1288, 1289, 1291, 1293, 1295, 1296, 1298, 1300, 1304, 1306, 1308, 1310 (Part), 1364 (Part),

1366, 1349 (Part), 1145 (Part), 1165 (Part), 1255 (Part), 1135, 1133 (Part), 1136, 1308/01, 1308/02.

Village Katarbaga: 38 (Part), 277 (Part), 286 (Part), 292 (Part), 295 (Part), 298, 307, 317, 327 (Part).

Village Kathaphali: 2, 3, 55, 60, 239, 17, 18, 24, 27, 57, 156, 175, 178, 187, 189, 37/336.

Village Paramanandapur: 244, 275(Part), 179/295 (Part), 2, 3, 34, 35, 37, 39, 40, 41, 60, 64, 65, 67, 68, 78, 79,

81, 82, 83, 104, 105, 108, 112, 114, 126, 144, 166, 168, 176, 177, 183 (Part), 233, 234, 245 (Part).

Hundarkhol Reserve Forest.

Kahnupahad Reserve Forest.

Boundary description:

The boundary of Dip side Manoharpur Coal Block obtained with World Geodetic System (WGS) 84 Datum line and

Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection system from Geological Report prepared by Central Mine Planning &

Design Institute (CMPDI).

Line 1-2 : The boundary starts from station ‘1’ is situated on the north-western corner of Dipside Manoharpur Coal

Block in village Katarbaga and runs towards east direction touches the common village boundary of Katarbaga and

Durubaga villages. Then the boundary enters into village Durubaga passes the village road of Durubaga-

8254

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 4, 2020/PAUSHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Pararmanandapur, then runs towards East and meets at station ‘2’ the northeast corner, inside the plot number 1349 of

Durubaga village (the northern boundary).

Line 2-3 : The line starts from station ‘2’ and runs towards south direction touches the common boundary of

Paraamanandapur village and Kahnupahad Reserve forest. The boundary enters into the Kahnupahad reserve forest and

touches the common boundary of Kahnupahad reserve forest Kathaphli village. Then the boundary enters into Kathaphali

village and meets at station ‘3’ i.e. the southeast corner station, inside the revenue plot number – 277 (the eastern

boundary). The Eastern boundary is limited to ‘Manoharpur’ coal block.

Line 3-4 : The line starts from station ‘3’ and runs towards west direction touches the common boundary of Kathaphali

village and Hundarkhol reserve forest and meets station ‘4’ the southwest corner station (the southern boundary).

Line 4-1 : The line starts from station ‘4’ and runs towards north direction touches the common boundary of

Hundarkhol reserve forest Katarbaga village, then the boundary enters to Katarbaga village and meets the station ‘1’ the

northwest corner station (the western boundary).

[F.No. 43015/13/2019-LA&IR ]

RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Dy. Secy.

Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=ky;

ubZ fnYyh] 23 fnlEcj] 2019

dk-vk- 2226.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ,y-

vkbZ-lh- vkQ bf.M;k ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 208@1999½ dks izdkf”kr djrh gS tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23-12-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-17012@34@1998-vkbZvkj ¼ch-II½]

lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 23rd December, 2019

S.O. 2226.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 208/1999) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of LIC of India, and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on 23.12.2019.

[No. L-17012/34/1998-IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/208-99

Shri Shyamdas Panika Manikpury

Ex-Peon of LIC,

Village Ghoghra,

P.O.Semri, Tehsil Shakti,

District Bilaspur

…Workman/Union

Versus

LIC of India,

The Sr.Divisional Manager,

LIC of India,

Divisional Office, Jeevan Bima Marg

Raipur-492001.

…Management

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 4] 2020@IkkS"k 14] 1941

8255

AWARD

(Passed on this 17th day of October, 2019)

As per letter No dated 14-5-1999 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference

is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification

No. L-17012/34/98/IR(B-II). The dispute under reference relates to:

“Whether the action of the Management of LIC of India Korba Branch, Dt. Bilaspur(under Divisional

Office,Raipur,MP) in terminating the services of Sh. Shyamdas Panike Manikpury, Ex-Peon, LIC Korba

Branch w.e.f. 25-10-1994 is justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled?’’

After registering the case on the basis of reference, notices were sent to the parties.

The case of the Workman as put in his statement of claim is that he was a peon in the Korba branch of the

Management Corporation from 5.12.1991 to 24.10.1994. He was disengaged/ terminated from services after an oral

order of the Management on 25.10.1994 without any notice or compensation. He raised a dispute before Assistant

Labour Commissioner on 23.12.1994. A compromise was reached at and he was given employment by Management

again on 28-2-1995. He remained employed till 19-2-1998 and was again terminated from services without any notice

or compensation. He further alleged that he was selected on the basis of interview and was paid wages as per rules. His

pay was also revised in August 1992 and he was paid difference between revised pay and old pay. He was also paid

bonus in 1997 and 1996. Accordingly, he worked for a period of more than 240 days in every year. His termination is

violative of Section 25-F and Section 25-N of Industrial Disputes Act. The principle of first come and first go was not

applied in his case. No seniority list of the workers were prepared, hence termination is against law on this ground also.

Accordingly, he has prayed that he be reinstated with all service benefits setting aside his termination.

The case of Management in their statement of defense is that the workman was a simple daily wager not entitled

to any post. He was not appointed against any vacancy. Accordingly to Section 49 of the Life Insurance Corporation

Act 1956, the Corporation may with the previous approval of the Central Government by notification in the Gazette of

India, make Regulation not inconsistent with the Act. Corporation, in exercise of powers vested in it under Clause (b) and

(bb) of Sub-Section 2 & Section-49 of the Act, has made Life Insurance Corporation of India(Staff ) Regulations 1960

hereinafter referred to as the ‘Regulations’. Regulation 8, of which provides for temporary staff. Also, it was pleaded

that the claimant had been working at Branch Office No.1 and No.2 of the management as daily wager for 4 days in

December,1990 and 97 days in 1991. He has worked as daily wager in Branch Office No.2 from 1991 to 1998 with

terminal breaks but he never worked for a period of 240 days in any year. Accordingly, it has been prayed that the

reference be answered against the workman.

In evidence the workman has examined himself on oath and has provided documents of experience certificate

of march,1996. The calculation sheet regarding arrears for the period August,1992 to March,1996 are Exhibit W-1 and

W-2 respectively. The Management has examined its witnesses Shri M.K.Gupta, Manager Law, Dinesh Khapad,

Officers and Sanjay Kr. Saha on oath but only Sanjay Kumar Saha was produced by Management for cross examination ,

hence on cross-examination of other two witnesses as mentioned will not be read into evidence in support of

Management. The Management has further filed and proved list regarding the days of work done by the

applicant/workman in 1990 and 1991, list/calculation sheet of work done from December,1991 to February,1998 which

are exhibit M-1 and M-2 respectively.

The workman did not appear hence arguments of learned counsel for Management Shri Amitabh Bharti was

heard by me. The workman was given opportunity to file written arguments which he did not avail. I have gone through

the record.

After having perused the record in the light of the arguments the following issues arise in this case:-

“1.-whether the termination of services of workman w.e.f from 25^th October,1994 is justified in law?

2.-If the answer to issue no.1 is in favour of workman to what relief the workman is entitled.?”

Issue No. 1

Though parties differ in their pleadings on the point whether the workman was a daily wager or regular

appointee, admitted is the fact between the parties is that the workman worked with the Management till Februaury,1998

whereas the dispute in the reference is whether the termination of services of Workman is w.e.f 25^th October,1994 is

justified or not. The reference itself is misdirected but it is not within the powers of this court to travel beyond the

reference as it will be against settled provisions of law in this respect. As stated earlier it is the case of the workman

which is admitted by the management that the workman was disengaged on 25^th October 1994 but was re-engaged

subsequently and remained engaged till December-1998 as mentioned above.

10.

Certain provisions of law which is required to be mentioned here are being mentioned as follows:-

8256

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 4, 2020/PAUSHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Section 2(oo) of Industrial Disputes Act:

2[(oo) “retrenchment” means the termination by the employer of the service of a workman for any any

reason whatsoever, otherwise than as a punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary action, but does not

include— (a) voluntary retirement of the workman; or (b) retirement of the workman on reaching the

age of superannuation if the contract of employment between the employer and the workman concerned

contains a stipulation in that behalf;

Section 2(bb) of the Industrial Disputes Act:

2 [(bb) termination of the service of the workman as a result of the non-renewal of the contract of

employment between the employer and the workman concerned on its expiry or of such contract being

terminated under a stipulation in that behalf contained therein; or]

Section 25(F) of the Industrial Disputes Act:

25F. Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen.—No workman employed in any industry who

has been in continuous service for not less than one year under an employer shall be retrenched by that

employer until— (a) the workman has been given one month’s notice in writing indicating the reasons for

retrenchment and the period of notice has expired, or the workman has been paid in lieu of such notice,

wages for the period of the notice; (b) the workman has been paid, at the time of retrenchment,

compensation which shall be equivalent to fifteen days' average pay 2 [for every completed year of

continuous service] or any part thereof in excess of six months; and (c) notice in the prescribed manner is

served on the appropriate Government 3 [or such authority as may be specified by the appropriate

Government by notification in the Official Gazette].

Section 25(N) of the Industrial Disputes Act:

[25N. Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen.—(1) No workman employed in any industrial

establishment to which this Chapter applies, who has been in continuous service for not less than one year

under an employer shall be retrenched by that employer until,— (a) the workman has been given three

months’ notice in writing indicating the reasons for retrenchment and the period of notice has expired, or

the workman has been paid in lieu of such notice, wages for the period of the notice; and (b) the prior

permission of the appropriate Government or such authority as may be specified by that Government by

notification in the Official Gazette (hereafter in this section referred to as the specified authority) has

been obtained on an application made in this behalf. (2) An application for permission under sub-section

(1) shall be made by the employer in the prescribed manner stating clearly the reasons for the intended

retrenchment and a copy of such application shall also be served simultaneously on the workmen

concerned in the prescribed manner. (3) Where an application for permission under sub-section (1) has

been made, the appropriate Government or the specified authority, after making such enquiry as it

thinks fit and after giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the employer, the workmen

concerned and the persons interested in such retrenchment, may, having regard to the genuineness and

adequacy of the reasons stated by the employer, the interests of the workmen and all other relevant

factors, by order and for reasons to be recorded in writing, grant or refuse to grant such permission and

a copy of such order shall be communicated to the employer and the workmen. (4) Where an application

for permission has been made under sub-section (1) and the appropriate Government or the specified

authority does not communicate the order granting or refusing to grant permission to the employer

within a period of sixty days from the date on which such application is made, the permission applied for

shall be deemed to have been granted on the expiration of the said period of sixty days. (5) An order of

the appropriate Government or the specified authority granting or refusing to grant permission shall,

subject to the provisions of sub-section (6), be final and binding on all the parties concerned and shall

remain in force for one year from the date of such order. 1. Sub-section (6) re-numbered as sub-section

(10) by Act 49 of 1984, s. 4 (w.e.f. 18-8-1984). 2. Subs. by s. 5, ibid., for section 25N (w.e.f. 18-8-1984). 33

(6) The appropriate Government or the specified authority may, either on its own motion or on the

application made by the employer or any workman, review its order granting or refusing to grant

permission under sub-section (3) or refer the matter or, as the case may be, cause it to be referred, to a

Tribunal for adjudication: Provided that where a reference has been made to a Tribunal under this sub-

section, it shall pass an award within a period of thirty days from the date of such reference. (7) Where no

application for permission under sub-section (1) is made, or where the permission for any retrenchment

has been refused, such retrenchment shall be deemed to be illegal from the date on which the notice of

retrenchment was given to the workman and the workman shall be entitled to all the benefits under any

law for the time being in force as if no notice had been given to him. (8) Notwithstanding anything

contained in the foregoing provisions of this section, the appropriate Government may, if it is satisfied

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 4] 2020@IkkS"k 14] 1941

8257

that owing to such exceptional circumstances as accident in the establishment or death of the employer or

the like, it is necessary so to do, by order, direct, that the provisions of sub- section (1) shall not apply in

relation to such establishment for such period as may be specified in the order. (9) Where permission for

retrenchment has been granted under sub-section (3) or where permission for retrenchment is deemed to

be granted under sub-section (4), every workman who is employed in that establishment immediately

before the date of application for permission under this section shall be entitled to receive, at the time of

retrenchment, compensation which shall be equivalent to fifteen days’ average pay for every completed

year of continuous service or any part thereof in excess of six months.]

Rule 76 of Industrial Dispute Central Rules-1957 :

76-Notice of retrenchment.—If any employer desires to retrench any workman employed in his industrial

establishment who has been in continuous service 1 Subs. by S.O. 2485, dated 20th May, 1985. 2 Subs. by

S.O. 2485, dated 20th May, 1985. 3 Subs. by G.S.R. 289, dated 2nd March, 1982 (w.e.f. 13-3-1982). 4 Subs.

by S.O. 2485, dated 20th May, 1985. The Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957 for not less than one

year under him (hereinafter referred to as ‘workman’ in this rule and in rules 77 and 78), he shall give

notice of such retrenchment as in Form P to the Central Government, the Regional Labour

Commissioner (Central) and Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central) and the Employment Exchange

concerned and such notice shall be served on that Government, the Regional Labour Commissioner

(Central), the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), and the Employment Exchange concerned by

registered post in the following manner:— (a) where notice is given to the workman, notice of

retrenchment shall be sent within three days from the date on which notice is given to the workman; (b)

where no notice is given to the workman and he is paid one month’s wages in lieu thereof, notice of

retrenchment shall be sent within three days from the date on which such wages are paid; and (c) where

retrenchment is carried out under an agreement which specifies a date for the termination of service,

notice of retrenchment shall be sent so as to reach the Central Government, the Regional Labour

Commissioner (Central), the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), and the Employment Exchange

concerned, at least one month before such date: Provided that if the date of termination of service agreed

upon is within 30 days of the agreement, the notice of retrenchment shall be sent to the Central

Government, the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), the Assistant Commissioner (Central), and

the Employment Exchange concerned, within 3 days of the agreement.

Rule 77 of Industrial Dispute Central Rules 1957:

77. Maintenance of seniority list of workmen.—The employer shall prepare a list of all workmen in the

particular category from which retrenchment is contemplated arranged according to the seniority of their

service in that category and cause a copy thereof to be pasted on a notice board in a conspicuous place in

the premises of the industrial establishment at least seven days before the actual date of retrenchment.

11.

Thus the relevant fact to the issue in hand is whether from the evidence on record the workman has successfully

proved his continuous engagement for a period of 240 days preceding his date of disengagement/termination. Exhibit

W-2 is the calculation sheet of difference in wages filed and proved by the workman which shows that within one year

preceding the date of his disengagement i.e from 24-10-1993 till 25-10-94 the workman has been paid, various amount

of money in some months. This amount is reduced which leads to an inference that in the month in which the amount in

the head of basic wages is reduced in Exhibit W-2 the workman did not work for the whole month. This fact becomes

more clear in the light of statement of Management witness and Exhibit M-2 the calculation sheet regarding days the

workman worked in every month in between December,1991 till February,1998. It shows that the workman has worked

for 171 days in the period January-1994 till October-1994. This document further shows that the workman worked

20 days in November and 23 days in December hence the total number of working days in the year preceding the date of

termination of the workman is less than 250 days and accordingly, a self service statement of the workman on oath is

that he worked 240 days or more in the year preceding the date of his termination is held not proved . On the basis of

above discussion the case of the workman that he worked for a period of 240 days in the year preceding the date of his

termination is held not proved.

12.

As regards to violation of other provisions of ‘Act’ as mentioned above, there is no evidence on record to

substantiate the work of the workman.

13.

In the light of above finding, it is held that the action of Management in determining the services of present

workman from 25-10-1994 is legal and justified in law.

Issue No.1 is answered according.

Issue No.2:-

In the light of finding recorded in Issue No.1the workman is held entitled to no relief.

8258

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 4, 2020/PAUSHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

14.

Accordingly the award is passed as follows:-

The action of Management of Life Insurance Corporation of Korba, District Bilaspur in

terminating the services of the present workman Shymlal Das Manikpuri w.e.f 25-10-1994 is

justified in law.

The Workman is held entitled to no relief.

15.

Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India,Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 23 fnlEcj] 2019

dk-vk- 2227.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ,l-th-

,l- bf.M;k izk- fy- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] eqEcbZ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 61@2018½ dks izdkf”kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 23-12-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-31025@02@2018-vkbZvkj ¼ch-II½]

lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 23rd December, 2019

S.O. 2227.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 61/2018) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No.

2, Mumbai as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of SGS India Pvt. Ltd., and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on 23.12.2019.

[No. L-31025/02/2018-IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI

PRESENT : M. V. Deshpande, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO.CGIT-2/61 of 2018

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S. S.G.S. INDIA PVT. LTD.

The Director [HR],

M/s. SGS India Pvt. Ltd.,

SGS House, 4B, A.S. Marg,

Vikhroli [W], Mumbai

Maharashtra – 4000 083.

AND

THEIR WORKMEN

The General Secretary,

Marmagoa Waterfront Worker’s Union,

PO : Box. No. 90,

VASCO, GOA.

Shri Ranjit N. Naik & 14 others,

C/o. Gopi P. Manjrekar, H. No. 137/157,

Merces Vaddem Chaferan,

Near Sai Baba Temple,

Vasco, Goa.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 4] 2020@IkkS"k 14] 1941

8259

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE EMPLOYER

Mr. Padmanabh Shetty, Advocate

FOR THE WORKMEN

Ms. Kunda Samant, Advocate

Mumbai, dated the 18^th November, 2019

AWARD

This is reference made by the Central Government in exercise of powers under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and

sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 vide Government of India, Ministry of Labour &

Employment, New Delhi vide its order No. L-31025/02/2018 – IR (B-II) dated 14.11.2018. The terms of reference given

in the schedule are as follows :

“Whether the demand raised by the management for resumption of work on alleged closure of its operations in

Goa w.e.f. 10.06.2016 and to tret the termination of services of 18 workmen [Annexure-V] as illegal, in view of

company still continuing and contracting out its work to M/s. Ericson Richard Company for the work at JSW,

Vasco, Goa, is legal and justified ? If, so, what relief they are entitled to ?’’

List of workers involved in the closure by S.G.S. India Pvt. Ltd.

Premnath Chodankar

Gopi Mandrekar

Bajirao Dessai

Sunder Gawde

Sonu Patekar

Anand Fatekar

Amol Naik

Vanita Shenvi

Ranjit Naik

10.

Ajay Kurtarkar

11.

Ramesh Naik

12.

Santosh Naik

13.

Bhagwan Dhawade

14.

Sushant Redkar

15.

Vasudev Mandrekar

16.

Sanjay Joshi

17.

Radha Honawarkar

18.

Sumitra Reddy

After the receipt of the reference, both the parties were served with the notices.

15 workmen filed application Ex.7 for deleting their names on the ground that first party employer have settled

their disputes, demands, claims, rights, differences etc. on monetary basis in full & final settlement as per settlement dt.

24.7.19. In view of that their names are deleted from the reference. In view of that it appears that even union has not filed

the statement of claim.

On going through the Roznama, it appears that union has not substantiated its claim by filing statement of claim

or other evidence on record. In view of that reference is liable to be rejected for want of evidence. Hence Order.

ORDER

Reference is rejected for want of evidence.

Date: 18.11.2019

M.V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer

8260

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 4, 2020/PAUSHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 23 fnlEcj] 2019

dk-vk- 2228.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ,l-th-

,l- bf.M;k izk- fy- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdkas vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] eqEcbZ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 40@2018½ dks izdkf”kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 23-12-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-31025@04@2018-vkbZvkj ¼ch-II½]

lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 23rd December, 2019

S.O. 2228.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 40/2018) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No.

2, Mumbai as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of SGS India Pvt. Ltd., and their

workmen, received by the Central Government on 23.12.2019.

[No. L-31025/04/2018-IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI

PRESENT : M. V. Deshpande, Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO.CGIT-2/40 of 2018

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S. S.G.S. INDIA PVT. LTD.

The Director [HR],

M/s. SGS India Pvt. Ltd.,

SGS House, 4B, A.S. Marg,

Vikhroli [W], Mumbai – 4000 083.

AND

THEIR WORKMEN

The General Secretary,

Marmagoa Waterfront Worker’s Union,

PO : Box. No. 90,

VASCO, GOA.

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE EMPLOYER

Mr. Padmanabh Shetty, Advocate

FOR THE WORKMEN

Ms. Kunda Samant, Advocate

Mumbai, dated the 18^th November, 2019

AWARD

This is reference made by the Central Government in exercise of powers under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and

sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 vide Government of India, Ministry of Labour &

Employment, New Delhi vide its order No. L-31025/04/2018 – IR (B-II) dated 28.08.2018. The terms of reference given

in the schedule are as follows :

“1) Whether the action of the management of SGS India Pvt. Ltd., Goa in not making payment of wages to

workmen Shri Baji Rao Desai, Shri Sonu Patekar, Shri Anand Fatji & shri Sunder Gaude w.e.f. 18.05.2015 is

legal, proper and justified ? If not legal and justified, what relief they are entitled to ?

2) Whether the action of the management of SGS India Pvt. Ltd., Goa in not making payment of wages to

workmen Shri Gopi Mandrekar and shri Premnath Chodankar effective w.e.f. 05.06.2015 is legal, proper and

justified ? If not legal and justified, what relief they are entitled to ?”

After the receipt of the reference, both the parties were served with the notices.

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 4] 2020@IkkS"k 14] 1941

8261

Three workmen filed application Ex.5 for deleting their names on the ground that first party employer have

settled their disputes, demands, claims, rights, differences etc. on monetary basis in full & final settlement as per

settlement dt. 24.7.19. In view of that their names are deleted from the reference. In view of that it appears that even

union has not filed the statement of claim.

On going through the Roznama, it appears that union has not substantiated its claim by filing statement of claim

or other evidence on record. In view of that reference is liable to be rejected for want of evidence. Hence Order.

ORDER

Reference is rejected for want of evidence.

Date: 18.11.2019

M. V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 23 fnlEcj] 2019

dk-vk- 2229.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj iatkc

us”kuy cSad ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdkas vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 25@2014½ dks izdkf”kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj

dks 23-12-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-12012@09@2014-vkbZvkj ¼ch-II½]

lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 23rd December, 2019

S.O. 2229.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 25/2014) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

No. 2, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Punjab National Bank,

and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 23.12.2019.

[No. L-12012/09/2014-IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II, NEW DELHI

Present: Smt. Pranita Mohanty, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-Cum-Labour

Court-II, New Delhi

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 25/2014

Date of Passing Award- 15^th November, 2019

Between:

Shri Isham Singh,

S/o Late Shri Sangat Singh, Vill Sandalhedi,

R/o PO. Puwarka,

Saharanpur (U.P)

…Workman

Versus

Project Director,

Punjab National Bank Shatabdi Gramin Vikas Nyas,

Matki-Jharauli, Distt- Saharanpur

Saharanpur (U.P)

Chairman Punjab National Bank,

C/o Shatabi-Gramin Vikas Nyas 3^rd Floor,

Atmaram House-1, Tolstory Marg,

New Delhi- 110001.

…Managements

8262

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 4, 2020/PAUSHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Appearances:-

Shri Sidharat Joshi, (A/R)

For the Workman.

Shri Rajat Arora, (A/R)

For the Managements

AWARD

The Government of India in Ministry of Labour & Employment has referred the present dispute existing

between employer i.e. the management of Punjab National Bank, and its workman/claimant herein, under clause (d) of

sub section (1) and sub section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act 1947 vide letter No. L-12012/09/2014

(IR(B-II) dated 26.02.2014 to this tribunal for adjudication to the following effect.

“Whether the action of the management of PNB Centenary Rural Development Trust, Saharanpur through its

Project Director for not considering the re-employment of Shri Isham Singh, Veterinary Attendant even after

rendering the services more than 5 year service is just and fair if not to what relief the workman is entitled to

and from which date?”

On receipt of the reference both the claimant and management where noticed. The claimant filed the claim

statement stating therein that on 07.12.1992 the board of Directors of PNB took a decision for creation of a Trust under

the name of “PNB Centenary Rural Development Trust” for undertaking Rural Development Projects and implementing

the same from funds received from National Fund for Rural Development. The said Trust established the project for soil

testing and artificial in semination Centre (veterinary Hospital) at Matki Jharoli in District of Saharanpur with a project

Director as the head of the Activities. In the year 2000 advertisement was issued in the newspaper by the management

no.1 for appointment to various posts. The claimant applied for the same and was selected for the post of veterinary

Assistant. An appointment letter was issued to him on 11.10.2000 for the period of 1 year on consolidated salary of Rs.

2000/- per month. The said temporary employment was renewed year after year and in the year 2009 the claimant was

promoted to the post of senior technician carrying consolidated pay of Rs. 6000/- per month as, he was having

educational qualification in MSC (Agriculture). His employment continued upto 10.09.2012 after which the same was

not renewed. Though the workman continued in the employment for about a decade, he was not getting the benefit like

the regular employee of the Bank. He was very often demanding the same and the workman continued to get fixed

monthly salary despite the fact that the PNB had sanctioned the specific post in regular pay scale for running the project.

All the representations made by the workman demanding regular pay scale as admissible to the other employees of PNB

were kept out of the consideration. In the year 2007 the management implemented the minimum wage notified by the

state of U.P under the provision of Minimum Wage Act. However the said practice was discontinued in the year 2009

and instead a consolidated amount of Rs. 6000/- was paid to the workman. Being aggrieved by the demand of the

claimant for the pay scale at par with U.P State Government the management terminated his service w.e.f. 10.09.2012

and while doing so never complied the provision of section 25-F,G, and H of the ID Act. Writ petition was filed by the

claimant before the Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad praying regularization of his service and revised pay scale of U.P

State Government. Though the management was fully aware about the pendency of the writ petition, issued a letter on

01.08.2012 asking the workman to make application for renewal of his contract within 3 days. Though, the claimant

complied the same the management took a plea of non receipt of the same and ultimately terminated his service w.e.f.

10.09.2012. The representation made by the claimant for reconsideration of the order dated 10.09.2012 was rejected.

Finding no other way he raised Industrial Dispute before the conciliation officer alleging that the termination of service

tantamounts to retrenchment within the meaning of section 2(OO) of the ID Act and the claimant having completed 240

days of work in a calendar year is entitled to the benefits of section 25-F,G, and H of the ID Act. Though the conciliation

proceeding was taken up and the management participated in the same it could not yield any result. On receipt of failure

report the Appropriate Government referred the matter for adjudication.

The management No.1, 2 jointly filed WS refutting the stand of the claimant. The specific plea taken by the

management in the WS is that the claimant was never an employee of the management Bank. A trust was created having

the name PNB centenary Rural Development Trust to undertake activities like soil testing artificial insemination,

treatment of animals, computer training, sewing training etc. The claimant was engaged on contractual basis for one year

w.e.f. 16.10.2000 and the contract was renewed every year for further period of one year upto 07.12.2009. After 2009 the

claimant continued in the job without the contract being renewed. On 01.08.2012 the claimant was asked to renew the

contract of employment within 30 days from the date of receipt of the notice failing which it would be presumed that the

claimant is not interested to continue with PNB centenary Rural Trust. Since the claimant failed to renew the contract he

was disengaged from the trust by letter dated 10.09.2012. It is the further stand of the management that the provisions of

section 25-F of the ID Act is not applicable to the workman since he is not a workman within the definition of section

2(S)of the ID Act. It has also been pleaded that the grievance of the claimant for non compliance of the provisions of

section 25-F of the ID Act cannot be adjudicated as the same is not within the scope of the reference received from the

appropriate government. While pleading that the reference is for adjudication regarding the refusal of the reemployment

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 4] 2020@IkkS"k 14] 1941

8263

of the claimant by the management all other stand taken by him regarding equal pay scale and non compliance of section

25-F are not tenable. While taking a stand as per the observation of the Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad the

management has pleaded that the appointment of petitioner was purely contractual as has been held by the Hon’ble High

Court and since the claimant failed to submit an application for renewal of his contract, his disengagement was rightly

done. With such assertion the management has pleaded for dismissal of the claim.

On these rival pleadings following issues were framed for adjudication.

ISSUES

Whether the action of the management PNB Centenary Rural Trust for not considering the

re-employment of the claimant even after rendering service for more than 5 years is just and fair? If so

its effect.

Whether the claimant comes within the category of the workman as defined in section 2(S) of the ID

Act.

To what relief the workman is entitled to.

On behalf of the claimant he examined himself as WW1 and placed certain documents which were marked in a

series of WW1/1 to WW1/23. These documents include the vacancy advertisement the appointment letter, several

representations made by the claimant demanding equal pay at par with the regular employees of the Bank, the last

contract renewal letter dated 07.12.2009 the promotion letter dated 08.12.2009 the Government circulars relating to

minimum wage payable to casual workers and the letter of the management asking the workman to renew his contract,

order of the Hon’ble High Court of the Allahabad etc. On the other hand the management examined the project director

of PNB Centenary Rural Development Trust as MW1. The witness also produced some documents which were marked

as MW1/1 to MW1/10. In addition to this the claimant also confronted the management witness with certain documents.

At the outset of the argument the Ld. A/R for the workman submitted that despite the order passed by the

Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad the management of PNB Centenary Rural Development Trust Saharanpur refused to

accept the candidature of the claimant for re-employment as Vetenary attendant even though he had rendered 12 years of

continuous service for the management. This refusal amounts to unfair labour practice and the claimant is entitled to the

relief sought in the claim petition.

In the reply argument the Ld. A/R for the management submitted that the Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad

have already decided that the employment of the workman was purely contractual in nature and renewable from time to

time. While disposing the writ petition the Hon’ble High Court never issued a direction for continuance of the service of

the claimant. Rather observed that the contractual employment having a particular life spam need to be renewed and once

no renewal proceeding has been undertaking, the action taken by the management cannot be faulted. That being the view

of the Hon’ble High Court’s decision, nothing more is left to be adjudicated in this proceeding and thereby he argued for

dismissal of the claim.

FINDINGS

ISSUE No. 1

By examining himself as WW1 and by producing a documents marked as WW1/12, WW1/10 and WW1/14 the

workman has stated that demanding equal pay scale and regularization of service writ was filed by him and other co-

workers before the Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad and the management contested the same. He was appointed

initially on 11.10.2000 on temporary basis and in the year 2009 was promoted to the post of senior technician. His

employment continued upto 10.09.2012 as such. Though his employment was initially temporary in nature, the same was

never renewed year to year except on one occasion i.e. in the year 2009. As per that renewal letter the engagement was

renewed for one year w.e.f. 07.12.2009 for a period ending 06.12.2010. After that no steps were ever taken by the

management for annual renewal of his employment. Being annoyed by the writ petition filed by him the management on

15.12.2011 by letter marked as WW1/10 directed the workman to produce documents of academic and technical

qualification within 3 days from the date of this notice failing which the matter shall be referred to the higher authorities.

On receipt of the said notice the claimant gave a reply requesting that the matter is pending before the Hon’ble High

Court and the authorities must wait for the decision. But the management again on 01.08.2012 vide a letter marked as

WW1/12 made a further communication asking. The workman to get the contract renewed on a proposed salary of

Rs. 7500/- per month giving ultimatum that if the contract is not renewed within 30 days of the notice no further

correspondence will be made. In reply to that notice the workman represented that the matter is subjudice before the

Hon’ble High Court Allahabad and the management should wait for the verdict. That letter of the workman dated

23.08.2012 has been marked as WW1/13. Soon after the receipt of the said reply the management by its letter dated

10.09.2012 marked as WW1/14 terminated the service of the workman w.e.f. 10.09.2012 and being aggrieved by the

same the Industrial Dispute was raised.

8264

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 4, 2020/PAUSHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

All these documents filed by the workman have been admitted by the management with explanation that the

engagement of the workman was purely temporary in nature and renewable from time to time. The workman since did

not opt for renewal of his contract despite service of the notice, the management rightly took a decision for his dis-

engagement. The Ld. A/R representing the management has filed a copy of the profile of PNB Centenary Rural

Development Trust and declaration of trust marked as MW1/6. This declaration deals with affairs and mode of

management of the same by the Trust. As per the terms and conditions contemplated therein the trust has the power of

making appointment of contractual staff for implementation of its schemes. A document has also been placed on record

which is the appointment letter of the claimant and this letter clearly shows that the appointment of the workman was

purely temporary in nature initially for a period of 1 year and the renewable subject to fulfillment of all the terms and

conditions etc. It is an admitted fact by both the parties that the appointment was last renewed in the year 2009. It is also

admitted that the claimant had filed writ petition No. 75503 of 2011 before the Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad

claiming pay and other service benefits at par with the regular employees of PNB and during pendency of that writ

petition the service of the claimant was terminated on 10.09.2012. The workman has argued that there was no renewal

year after year as claimed by the management and as a vindicated action on the pretext of renewal his service was

terminated.

But the documents like the appointment letter placed on record by both the parties clearly shows that the

appointment was against the post created under the trust which was purely temporary and initially for a period of one

year renewable thereafter. Why the contract was not renewed every year is not the subject matter of adjudication in this

dispute. The dispute relates to the decisions of the management in not renewing the service of the workman after

10.09.2012. The management has explained that the Hon’ble High Court in its order dated 20.11.2012 passed in WPC

No. 75503/2011 have clearly held that once the appointment is purely contractual and the contract has fixed the life span

of the employment the same is required to be renewed time to time. The Hon’ble High Court have also held that even if

the petitioners have over stayed for some time without renewal of the contract the same would not confer an indefeasible

right on the petitioner to claim continuance with the trust in question. Not only that the Hon’ble Court have also held in

the same order that when the petitioner was asked to take steps for renewal and he failed to do so, it cannot be held that

the management trust had not acted fairly by terminating the service of the claimant workman.

In the oral evidence the workman during cross examination has admitted that he was served with a notice by the

management for renewal of the contract of his employment vide letter dated 15.12.2011 and 01.08.2012. A last and final

notice was served on him for renewal of his contract. It has also been admitted that instead of doing so the workman

made correspondence with the management requesting to wait for the final verdict of the Hon’ble High Court. Thus,

from the circumstances it clearly appears that the appointment of the workman as per his contract of appointment was

purely temporary in nature and the same was required to be renewed on periodical intervals. When the management

wanted the workman to take steps for renewal and he did not comply with the direction, a final notice was served on him

giving 30days time to perform his part for renewal of the contract. On that occasion also the workman failed to comply

and as a consequence thereof his service was terminated vide letter dated 10.09.2012 marked as WW1/14. These facts

based on record have been confirmed by the management witness in his oral testimony. At this juncture it is pertinent to

refer to the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad vide order dated 20.11.2012 passed in WPC No.

75503/2011. In the said order the Hon’ble High Court have held in clear term that the appointment of the claimant, was

temporary in nature and purely contractual prescribing a particular life span. That contract was not renewed regularly

having the effect of over staying of the claimant for some time. But that would not confer a right automatically on the

claimant for further continuance in the job.

As evident from evidence both oral and documentary the management trust had asked the workman several

times to take steps for renewal of his contract. On one occasion a 30 days notice for the purpose was also given as a last

opportunity. As admitted by the claimant he never complied with the direction leading to passing of the order of

termination dated 10.09.2012. Thus, the action of the management in not renewing the contract of employment of the

workman cannot be found with fault.

The reference has been received for adjudication on the correctness of the decision of the project director in not

considering the re-employment of claimant since he had rendered the service for more than 5 years. In his oral statement

the claimant has stated that the Hon’ble High Court in its order dated 20.11.2012 had directed the management to

consider the request of the workman, deal and decide the same in accordance with law preferably within next two months

keeping it open for the management to decide acceptance or non acceptance of his candidature. The workman in his oral

statement has stated that when he made application to the management the same was arbitrarily rejected.

The witness examined by the management as MW1 has stated that after termination of contract of the workman

a fresh advertisement was issued in the Local Newspaper on 14.02.13 to fillup the vacant post. The claimant was aware

of the said advertisement. The said vacant posts were re-advertised on 16.07.2014. The claimant when made application

for his re-employment he was intimated vide letter dated 06.02.2013(MW1/8), 25.02.2013(MW1/9) and letter dated

21.07.2014 (MW1/10) to apply properly pursuant to the said advertisement. The workman has not adduced oral or

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 4] 2020@IkkS"k 14] 1941

8265

documentary evidence to prove that pursuant to the advertisement application was submitted by him. During course of

argument the Ld. A/R for the claimant submitted that as per the direction of the Hon’ble High Court the management

should have considered his employment against the vacant post instead of making fresh advertisement. This argument

advanced on the behalf of the claimant finds no support from the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court where in the

management was given liberty to consider the candidature of the claimant according to rule and procedure. In the said

order the Hon’ble High Court had also kept open for the management to decide the continuance and non continuance of

the claimant for the post. Hence, when the management decided to issue fresh advertisement for the vacancy and

informed the claimant to apply for the same, and when there is no evidence to believe that any application was submitted

by him but not considered by the management, it cannot be held that the action of the management in not considering his

re-employment as a Vetnary Attendant was illegal or improper. This issue is accordingly decided against the workman.

ISSUE No.2

The management in its WS has stated that the PNB Centenary Rural Development Trust is not an industry and

the claimant is not a workman as defined u/s 2(S) of the ID Act. This issue was never seriously pursued by the parties

during the course of adjudication. The law is well settled that industry means any business, trade, undertaking,

manufacture or calling of employees and includes any calling, service, employment, handcraft, or industrial occupation

or avocation of workmen. In that view of the matter the activities undertaken by the management Trust very well falls

within the definition of Industry. The Industrial Dispute Act also defines the workman which includes any person

employed in any Industry to do any manual unskilled skilled or technical work for hire or reward etc. The claimant since

engaged as a vetnary assistant is a workman under the definition given in the Industrial Dispute Act 1947. This issue is

accordingly decided in favour of the claimant.

ISSUE No.3

In view of the finding given in issue no.1 the claimant is held not entitled to any relief as sought by him. Hence,

ordered.

ORDER

The reference be and the same is answered against the claimant and it is held that the claimant is not entitled to

any relief as claimed by him. Send a copy of this award to the appropriate government for notification as required under

section 17 of the ID act 1947.

The reference is accordingly answered.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

SMT. PRANITA MOHANTY, Presiding Officer

15^th November, 2019

ubZ fnYyh] 23 fnlEcj] 2019

dk-vk- 2230.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj iatkc

us”kuy cSad ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- 2] ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 20@2014½ dks izdkf”kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj

dks 23-12-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-12012@08@2014-vkbZvkj ¼ch-II½]

lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 23rd December, 2019

S.O. 2230.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 20/2014) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

No. 2, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Punjab National Bank,

and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 23.12.2019.

[No. L-12012/08/2014-IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

8266

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 4, 2020/PAUSHA 14, 1941

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II, NEW DELHI

Present: Smt. Pranita Mohanty, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-Cum-Labour

Court-II, New Delhi

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 20/2014

Date of Passing Award- 15^th November, 2019

Between:

Shri Hement Kumar,

S/o Shri Umesh Chand,

R/o Village Matki Jharoli,

PO Ghunna,

Saharanpur (U.P)

…Workman

Versus

Project Director,

Punjab National Bank Shatabdi Gramin Vikas Nyas,

Matki-Jharauli, Distt- Saharanpur

Saharanpur(U.P)

Chairman Punjab National Bank,

C/o Shatabi-Gramin Vikas Nyas 3^rd Floor,

Atmaram House-1, Tolstory Marg,

New Delhi- 110001.

…Managements

Appearances:-

Shri Sidharat Joshi, (A/R)

For the Workman

Shri Rajat Arora, (A/R)

For the Managements

AWARD

The Government of India in Ministry of Labour & Employment has referred the present dispute existing

between employer i.e. the management of Punjab National Bank, and its workman/claimant herein, under clause (d) of

sub section (1)and sub section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act 1947 vide letter No. L-12012/08/2014

(IR(B-II) dated 03.03.2014 to this tribunal for adjudication to the following effect.

“Whether the action of the management of PNB Centenary Rural Development Trust, Saharanpur through its

Project Director for not considering the re-employment of Shri Hement Kumar, Chowkidar on compassionate

grounds even after rendering the services more than 5 year service is just and fair if not to what relief the

workman is entitled to and from which date?”

On receipt of the reference both the claimant and management where noticed. The claimant filed the claim

statement stating therein that on 07.12.1992 the board of Directors of PNB took a decision for creation of a Trust under

the name of “PNB Centenary Rural Development Trust” for undertaking Rural Development Projects and implementing

the same from funds received from National Fund for Rural Development. The said Trust established the project for soil

testing and artificial in semination Centre (veterinary Hospital) at Matki Jharoli in District of Saharanpur with a project

Director as the head of the Activities. In the year 2000 advertisement was issued in the newspaper by the management

no.1 for appointment to various posts. The father of the claimant had applied for the same and was selected for the post

of Sweeper. An appointment letter was issued to him on 01.01.2007 for the period of 1 year on consolidated salary. Since

the father of the claimant died during the service the present claimant got compassionate appointment in place of his

father against the post of the peon and one appointment letter was issued to him on 01.01.2007 on temporary basis for

one year on a consolidated salary of Rs. 2000/- per month. The said temporary employment was renewed year after year

and in the year 2009 the claimant was paid the consolidated salary of Rs. 4000/- per month. His employment continued

upto 10.09.2012 after which the same was not renewed. Though the workman continued in the employment for about a

decade, he was not getting the benefit like the regular employee of the Bank. He was very often demanding the same and

the workman continued to get fixed monthly salary despite the fact that the PNB had sanctioned the specific post in

regular pay scale for running the project. All the representations made by the workman demanding regular pay scale as

[Hkkx II—[k.M 3(ii)]

Hkkjr dk jkti=k % tuojh 4] 2020@IkkS"k 14] 1941

8267

admissible to the other employees of PNB were kept out of the consideration. In the year 2007 the management

implemented the minimum wage notified by the state of U.P under the provision of Minimum Wage Act. However the

said practice was discontinued in the year 2009 and instead a consolidated amount of Rs. 2000/- he was paid Rs. 4000/-.

Being aggrieved by the demand of the claimant for the pay scale at par with U.P State Government the management

terminated his service w.e.f. 10.09.2012 and while doing so never complied the provision of section 25-F,G, and H of the

ID Act. Writ petition was filed by the claimant before the Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad praying regularization of his

service and revised pay scale of U.P State Government. Though the management was fully aware about the pendency of

the writ petition, issued a letter on 01.08.2012 asking the workman to make application for renewal of his contract within

3 days. Though, the claimant complied the same the management took a plea of non receipt of the same and ultimately

terminated his service w.e.f. 10.09.2012. The representation made by the claimant for reconsideration of the order dated

10.09.2012 was rejected. Finding no other way he raised Industrial Dispute before the conciliation officer alleging that

the termination of service tantamounts to retrenchment within the meaning of section 2(OO) of the ID Act and the

claimant having completed 240 days of work in a calendar year is entitled to the benefits of section 25-F,G, and H of the

ID Act. Though the conciliation proceeding was taken up and the management participated in the same it could not yield

any result. On receipt of failure report the Appropriate Government referred the matter for adjudication.

The management No.1, 2 jointly filed WS refutting the stand of the claimant. The specific plea taken by the

management in the WS is that the claimant was never an employee of the management Bank. A trust was created having

the name PNB Centenary Rural Development Trust to undertake activities like soil testing artificial insemination,