3731 GI/2020

(2231)

रजिस्ट्री सं. डी.एल. (एन) 04/0007/2003—05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

xxxGIDHxxx

xxxGIDExxx

प्राजिकार से प्रकाजित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप् ताजिक

WEEKLY

सं.

31]

नई दिल् ली, अगस्ट् त 23—अगस्ट् त 29, 2020, िजनवार/ भाद्र 1—भाद्र 7, 1942

No. 31]

NEW DELHI, AUGUST 23—AUGUST 29, 2020, SATURDAY/BHADRA 1— BHADRA 7, 1942

इस भाग में जभन् न ृष्‍ सं्‍ ा िी िाती िज जिससे दक ि ृष क संकलन के प ृ में र ा िा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भागII— ण् ड 3—उृ- ण् ड(ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्राल ों (रक्षा मंत्राल को छोड़कर) द्वारा िारी दकए गए सांजवजिक आिेि और अजिसूचनाएं

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

ृ यटन मंत्राल

नई दिल् ली, 26 अगस्ट् त, 2020

का.आ. 718.—सरकारी स्ट् ान (अप्राजिकषत अजिभोजग ों कब देि ली) अजिजन म, 1971 (1971 का 40)

कब िारा 3 द्वारा प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए और ृ यटन मंत्राल में भारत सरकार कब अजिसूचना, भारत के

रािृत्र दिनांक 22 अिूदर, 2011 में प्रकाजित दिनांक 11 अिूदर, 2011 का.आ. सं्‍ ा 2950; भारत के रािृत्र

दिनांक 5 दिसंदर, 2009 में प्रकाजित दिनांक 24 नवंदर, 2009 का.आ. सं्‍ ा 3259; भारत के रािृत्र दिनांक

17 िनवरी, 2009 में प्रकाजित दिनांक 2 िनवरी, 2009 का.आ. सं्‍ ा 87 का अजिक्रमण करते हुए और ऐसे

अजिक्रमण से ृूवय, दकए गए अ वा दकए िाने वाले का ों से चूकने से संदंजित को छोड़कर, भारत सरकार एति् द्वारा

नीचे िी गई ताजलका के कॉलम (1) में उजल्लज त अजिकारी को इस अजिजन म के प्र ोिनों के जलए सम् ृिा

अजिकारी िोने के जलए सरकार के रािृजत्रत अजिकारी के ृि के समतुल् िोने के कारण अजिकारी जन ु्‍ त करती िज

और उि ताजलका के कॉलम (2) में तिनुप ृी प्रजवजि में ा जनर्ियि, सरकारी स्ट् ानों कब स्ट् ानी सीमा क को भी

सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-12092020-221708

CG-DL-W-12092020-221708

2232 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 29, 2020/BHADRA 7, 1942

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ृररभाजित करती िज, जिसके संदंि में उि सम् ृिा अजिकारी, सम् ृिा अजिकारी द्वारा अ वा उ्‍ त अजिजन म के

अंतगयत प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करेगा, और अजिरोजृत कतयव्यों का जन्‍ ृािन करेगा

ताजलका

अजिकारी का ृिनाम

(1)

सरकारी स्ट् ान कब श्रेजण ां और अजिकार क्षेत्र कब स्ट् ानी

सीमाएं

(2)

उृाध् क्ष, मजससय भारत ृ यटन जवकास जनगम

जलजमटेड, मु्‍ ाल , स्ट्कोृ कॉम्प्ले्‍स, कोर 8,

7 लोिी रोड, नई दिल्ली – 110003

दिल्ली, मध्

प्रिेि, उत्तर

प्रिेि,

ओजडिा

और

केंद्र

िाजसत प्रिेि िम्मू एवं कश्मीर में जस्ट् त मजससय भारत ृ यटन

जवकास जनगम जलजमटेड कब अ वा उसके द्वारा ृट्टे ृर जलए गए

सभी स्ट् ान ा ृररसंृजत्त ां

[फा. सं. ई.ओ.एन.ृी.एस. ू.—6/15/2018]

रुपृंिर दरार, अृर मिाजनिेिक (ृ यटन)

MINISTRY OF TOURISM

New Delhi, the 26th August, 2020

S.O. 718.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction of

unauthorized occupants) Act, 1971 (40 of 1971) and in supersession of the Notification of the Government of

India in the Ministry of Tourism, S.O. No. 2950 dated 11^th October, 2011 published in the Gazette of India dated

22^nd October, 2011; S.O. No. 3259 dated 24^th November, 2009 published in the Gazette of India dated

5^th December, 2009and S.O. No. 87 dated 2^nd January, 2009 published in the Gazette of India dated 17^thJanuary,

2009 except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such supersession, the Government of India

hereby appoints the officer mentioned in the column (1) of the table below, being the officer equivalent to the

rank of gazetted officer of the Government to be the Estate Officer for the purposes of this Act and also defines

the local limits of public premises, as specified in the corresponding entry in column (2) of the said table, in

respect of which the said estate officer shall exercise the powers conferred, and perform duties imposed, on the

Estate Officer by or under the said Act.

TABLE

Designation of the Officer

(1)

Categories of public premises and local limits of the jurisdiction.

(2)

Vice

President,

M/s

India

Tourism

Development Corporation Limited, Head

Quarter, Scope Complex, Core 8, 7 Lodi

Road, New Delhi - 110003.

All premises or properties belonging to or taken on lease by

M/s. India Tourism Development Corporation Limited situated

in Delhi, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Odisha and Union

Territory of Jammu and Kashmir.

[F. No. EON. PSU-6/15/2018]

RUPINDER BRAR, Addl. Director General (Tourism)

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट् त 29, 2020/भाद्र 7, 1942

2233

को ला मंत्राल

नई दिल् ली, 27 अगस्ट् त, 2020

का.आ. 719.—केन् द्री सरकार ने को ला िारक क्षेत्र (अियन और जवकास) अजिजन म, 1957 (1957 का

20) (जिसे इसमें इसके ृश् चात् उ्‍ त अजिजन म किा ग ा िज) कब िारा 7 कब उृिारा (1) के अिीन जारी भारत

सरकार के को ला मंत्राल कब अजिसूचना सं्‍ ा का. आ. 59, तारी 15 िनवरी, 2020 द्वारा िो भारत के

रािृत्र, भाग II, ण् ड 3, उृ- ण् ड (ii), तारी 18 िनवरी, 2020 में प्रकाजित कब गई ी, उ्‍ त अजिसूचना से

संलग् न अनुसूची में ा जवजनर्िय्‍ ट ृररक्षेत्र में 944.98 िे्‍टे र (लगभग) ा 2409.14 एकड़ (लगभग) माृ वाली

भूजम में ा उस ृर के सभी अजिकारों के अियन करने के अृने आि कब सूचना िी ी;

और सक्षम प्राजिकारी ने उ्‍ त अजिजन म कब िारा 8 के अनुसरण में केन् द्री सरकार को अृनी ररृोटय

िे िी िज ;

और केन् द्री सरकार का, ृूवो्‍ त ररृोटय ृर जवचार करने के ृश् चात् और मिारा्‍ र सरकार से ृरामिय

करने के ृश् चात् ि समािान िो ग ा िज, दक इसे संलग् न अनुसूची में ा व्णत 944.98 िे्‍ टर (लगभग) ा

2409.14 एकड़ (लगभग) माृ वाली भूजम और ऐसी भूजम में ा उस ृर के सभी अजिकार अर्ियत दकए िाने

चाजिए;

अत: अद केन् द्री सरकार, को ला िारक क्षेत्र (अियन और जवकास) अजिजन म, 1957 (1957 का 20) कब

िारा 9 कब उृिारा (1) द्वारा प्रित् त िज्‍ त ों का प्र ोग करते हुए ि षोिणा करती िज दक, अनुसूची में व्णत

944.98 िे्‍ टर (लगभग) ा 2409.14 एकड़ (लगभग) माृ वाली भूजम में ा उस ृर के सभी अजिकार अर्ियत

दकए िाते िैं

इस अजिसूचना के अंतगयत आने वाले क्षेत्र के रे ांक सं्‍ ा सी-I(ई) III/िेिेएमआर/0620/ 959, तारी

16 िून, 2020 का जनरीक्षण कल्‍ टर, जिला चंद्रृुर, मिारा्‍ र के का ायल में ा को ला जन ंत्रक, 1, काउंजसल

िाउस स्ट् रीट, कोलकाता- 700 001 के का ायल में ा जवभागाि् क्ष/मु्‍ प्रदंिक, वेस्ट् टनय कोलफबल् ्स जलजमटेड,

रािस्ट् व जवभाग, कोल एस्ट् टेट, जसजवल लाइन् स, नागृुर - 440 001 (मिारा्‍ र) के का ायल में दक ा िा सकेगा

अनुसूची

सम् मामेजलत एकोणा I और II जववषत् त ान

मािरी क्षेत्र

जिला चंद्रृुर (मिारा्‍ र)

(रे ांक सं्‍ ा सी- I (ई) III/िेिेएमआर/0620/959, तारी 16 िून, 2020)

भाग - I

सभी अजिकार :

क्रम

सं.

ग्राम का नाम

ृटवारी सर्कयल

सं्‍ ा

तिसील

जिला

भूजम का वणयन

( िे्‍टे र में )

कुल

(िे्‍टे र

में )

रटप् ृजण ां

जनिी

सरकारी

वन

1

एकोणा

11

वरोरा

चंद्रृुर

34.08

0.50

-

34.58

भाग

2

माडाय

11

वरोरा

चंद्रृुर 142.63

4.80

-

180.43

भाग

2234 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 29, 2020/BHADRA 7, 1942

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

3

वनोिा

11

वरोरा

चंद्रृुर 319.93

18.85

-

338.48

भाग

4

चप र टी

10

वरोरा

चंद्रृुर

56.03

3.02

-

59.05

भाग

5

ना िेव

10

वरोरा

चंद्रृुर

68.93

1.19

-

40.12

भाग

6

नगाला रर

10

वरोरा

चंद्रृुर

46.89

3.86

0.62

81.34

भाग

कुल :

431.49

35.22

0.62

464.33

भाग - II

सभी अजिकार :

क्रम

सं.

ग्राम का नाम

ृटवारी सर्कयल

सं्‍ ा

तिसील

जिला

भूजम का वणयन

( िे्‍टे र में )

कुल

(िे्‍टे र

में)

रटप् ृजण ां

जनिी

सरकारी

वन

1

एकोणा

11

वरोरा

चंद्रृुर

53.55

3.58

-

57.13

भाग

2

माडाय

11

वरोरा

चंद्रृुर 145.12

5.40

-

150.52

भाग

कुल :

198.64

8.98

0.00

207.65

कुल ोग : ( भाग- और भाग ) : 464.33 +204.65= 944.98 िे्‍टे र (लगभग )

ा 2409.14 एकड़ (लगभग)

भाग - I

(1)

ग्राम एकोणा में अर्ियत दकए गए प् लाट सं्‍ ांक :

82/1- 82/2- 82/3, 85, 86, 93/1/क- 93/1/ , 93/2, 94, 95, 96, 117, 118, 119, 120/1/क -120/1/ ,

120/2, 121/1-121/2, 122/1, 122/2, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 134, 135/1-135/2-135/3,

सड़क

(2)

ग्राम वनोिा में अर्ियत दकए गए प् लाट सं्‍ ांक :

32/1- 32/2, 34/1/क- 34/1/ - 34/2/क- 34/2/ - 34/2/ग, 35/1-35/2-35/3, 36, 37, 38, 39, 43/1-

43/2, 44, 45/1- 45/2/क- 45/2/ , 46/1- 46/2, 47/1- 47/2/क- 47/2/ - 47/2/ग/1- 47/2/ग/2, 48/1-

48/2, 49/1/क- 49/1/ - 49/2, 50, 51/1- 51/2, 52/1- 52/2/क- 52/2/ - 52/2/ग- 52/2/ष, 53/1- 53/2-

53/3, 54, 55/1- 55/2/क/1- 55/2/क/2क- 55/2/क/2 - 55/2/ - 55/2/ग- 55/2/ष- 55/3, 56/1- 56/2, 57,

58/1/क- 58/1/ - 58/1/क- 58/2, 59/1- 59/2, 60/1- 60/2, 61/1- 61/2- 61/3, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67,

68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73/1- 73/2, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79/1- 79/2- 79/3/क- 79/3/ , 80/1- 80/2,

81/1- 81/2, 82/1- 82/2, 83, 84/1/क/1- 84/1/क/2- 84/1/ - 84/1/क- 84/2, 85/1/क- 85/1/ , 97, 98,

99, 100, 101/1- 101/2, 102, 103, 104/1- 104/2- 104/3, 105/1- 105/2, 106, 107, 108, 109,

110/1- 110/2, 111/1- 111/2, 112, 113, 114/1- 114/2, 115/1- 115/2, 116/1- 116/2- 116/3,

117/1- 117/2, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123/1/क- 123/1/ - 123/2, 124, 125, 127, 128/1-

128/2, 129, 130/1- 130/2, 131, 132, 133, 135, 136/1- 136/2- 136/3, 137, 138/1- 138/2, 139/1-

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट् त 29, 2020/भाद्र 7, 1942

2235

139/2, 140/1- 140/2, 141/1/क- 141/1/ - 141/1/ग- 141/2, 142, 143, 144/1- 144/2, 145, 146/1-

146/2, 147, 148, 149/1- 149/2- 149/3, 150, 151, 157/1- 157/2, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163,

164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169/1- 169/2- 169/3, 170, 171/1- 171/2, 172/1- 172/2, 173, 174,

175, 176/1/क- 176/1/ - 176/2, 177/1- 177/2, 178/1/क- 178/1/ - 178/2/क- 178/2/ - 178/3,

179, 180/1- 180/2, 181, 182, 183, 184/1- 184/2- 184/3, 185, 186, 187/1- 187/2, 188/1-

188/2- 188/3, 189/1- 189/2- 189/3, 190, 191, 192, 193/1/क- 193/1/ - 193/1/ग- 193/2- 193/3,

194, 195, 196, 197, 198/1- 198/2, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206/1- 206/3, 207/1/क-

207/1/ - 207/2- 207/3, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212/1- 212/2, 213, 214, 224/1- 224/2- 224/3-

224/4, 225/1- 225/3, 226, 227/1- 227/3, 228/1/क- 228/1/ग- 228/2/क- 228/2/ग, 230/1- 230/2,

461, 462/1- 462/2, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 470, सड़क, नाला

(3)

ग्राम चप र टी में अर्ियत दकए गए प् लाट सं्‍ ांक :

412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418/1- 418/2- 418/3, 419/1- 419/2, 420/1- 420/2, 451/1-

451/2/क- 451/2/ , 452, 453, 454/1- 454/2, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459/1- 459/2, 460, 461/1-

461/2, 462/1- 462/2, 463, 465/1- 465/2/1- 465/2/2- 465/2/3, 493, 494, 516, सड़क, नाला

(4)

ग्राम माडाय में अर्ियत दकए गए प् लाट सं्‍ ांक :

116, 117, 118/1- 118/2, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 126/1- 126/2, 127, 128, 129/1/क-

129/1/ - 129/2/ , 130/1- 130/2, 131, 133/1- 133/2, 134/1- 134/2, 135/1- 135/2, 136/1-

136/2, 149/1- 149/2/क- 149/2/ , 150, 151/1- 151/2, 152, 153, 154, 155/1- 155/2/क- 155/2/ ,

156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161/1- 161/2, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169/1- 169/2, 170, 171/1-

171/2, 172, 173/1- 173/2- 173/3, 174/1- 174/2, 175/1- 175/2- 175/3/क- 175/3/ , 176, 177,

178, 179/1- 179/2, 180/1- 180/2, 181/1- 181/2- 181/3- 181/4, 182/1- 182/2, 183, 184/1-

184/2, 185/1- 185/2, 186/1- 186/2, 187/1- 187/2, 188/1- 188/2, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193/1-

193/2, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205/1/क- 205/1/ - 205/2/क-

205/2/ , 206/1/क- 206/1/ - 206/2, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212/1- 212/2, 213/1- 213/2, 214,

215, 216/1- 216/2- 216/3- 216/4, 217/1- 217/2, 218/1- 218/2, 219, 224, 247, 251, 252, 253,

254, 255/1- 255/2- 255/3, 256/1- 256/2, 257, 258/1- 258/2, 259, 260/1- 260/2, 261, 262, 263,

266, 304, 305/1- 305/2, 306/1/क- 306/1/ - 306/2, 307, 308/1- 308/2- 308/3, 309, 310, 313/1-

313/2, 314, सड़क

(5) ग्राम ना िेव में अर्ियत दकए गए प् लाट सं्‍ ांक :

9, 10, 11/1- 11/2, 12/1- 12/2- 12/3, 13/1- 13/2, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18/1/क- 18/1/ - 18/2/क-

18/2/ - 18/3- 18/4/क- 18/4/ , 19, 20/1- 20/2, 21/1- 21/2, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29/1-

29/2- 29/3- 29/4, 30, 31/1/क- 31/1 - 31/2, 32/1- 32/2, 33, 34, 35, 36/1- 36/2- 36/3, 37,

38/1/क- 38/1/ - 38/2/क- 38/2/ , 39, 40/1- 40/2, 41/1- 41/2, 42/1- 42/2, 43/1- 43/2, 44/1- 44/2-

44/3, 45/1/क- 45/1/ - 45/1/ग- 45/2/क- 45/2/ - 45/2/ग- 45/3/क- 45/3/ - 45/3/ग, 46/2/क- 46/2/

2236 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 29, 2020/BHADRA 7, 1942

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(6) ग्राम नगाला रर में अर्ियत दकए गए प् लाट सं्‍ ांक :

1, 2/1- 2/2, 3/1/क- 3/1/ - 3/1/ग- 3/2/क/1- 3/2/क/2- 3/2/ - 3/2/ग, 4, 5/1- 5/2, 6/1- 6/2- 6/3, 7/1-

7/2, 8, 9, 10/क/1- 10/क/2- 10/ /1- 10/ /2, 11/1/क- 11/1/ /1- 11/1/ /2- 11/2/क- 11/2/ , 12,

13/1/क- 13/1/ - 13/2- 13/3, 14/1- 14/2, 15, 16/1- 16/2- 16/3- 16/4, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21/1- 21/2,

22, 23/1/क- 23/1/ - 23/2, 24/1- 24/2- 24/3, 25, 29, नाला, सड़क

भाग – II

(1) ग्राम एकोणा में अर्ियत दकए गए प् लाट सं्‍ ांक :

164/1/1- 164/1/2- 164/2/क- 164/2/ , 165, 166, 167/1- 167/2, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173,

174, 175, 176, 177/1- 177/2, 178/1- 178/2, 180/1क- 180/1 - 180/2- 180/3- 180/4- 180/5-

180/6- 180/7- 180/8, 181/1- 181/2- 181/3- 181/4, 182/1/क- 182/1/ - 182/2/क- 182/2/ ,

183/1/क- 183/1/ - 183/2- 183/3/क- 183/3/ - 183/4- 183/5, 184/1- 184/2, 185/1/क- 185/1/ -

185/2, 190, 191, 192, 193, सरकारी भूजम

(2) ग्राम माडाय में अर्ियत दकए गए प् लाट सं्‍ ांक :

2, 3, 4, 5/1- 5/2, 6/1/क- 6/1/ - 6/2/क- 6/2/ , 7, 8, 9, 10/1/क- 10/1/ - 10/1/ग- 10/1/ष- 10/2-

10/3- 10/4, 11, 12, 13/1- 13/2, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23/1- 23/2, 24, 25, 26, 27/1-

27/2- 27/3- 27/4, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32/1- 32/2, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39/1/क- 39/1/ /1-

39/1/ग/2- 39/2/क- 39/2/ - 39/2/ग, 40, 41, 42/1- 42/2- 42/3- 42/4, 43, 44, 45/1- 45/2, 46/1-

46/2, 47, 48, 49/1/क- 49/1/ - 49/2, 50, 51, 52/1/क/1- 52/1/क/2- 52/1/ /1- 52/1/ /2- 52/1/ग/1-

52/1/ग/2- 52/2, 53/1- 53/2- 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68/क/1-

68/क/2- 68/ - 68/ग, 69/1- 69/2- 69/3- 69/4- 69/5, 70/1- 70/2, 71, 72, 73, 74, 76/1- 76/2, 275,

276, 277, 278/1- 278/2, 279, 280, 281, 282/1- 281/2, 283, 284/1- 284/2, 285, 286, 320/1/क-

320/क/2- 320/2, 321/1- 321/2- 321/3, 323/1- 323/2, 324, 441, 442, सड़क, नाला

सीमा – वणयन :

भाग - I

क – :

रे ा ग्राम वनोिा और माडाय कब सजम् मजलत ग्राम सीमा के जनकट सड़क ृर जस्ट् त जदन् िु ‘क’ से आरंभ

िोकर उत् तर-ृजश् चम दििा में सजम् मजलत ग्राम सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई प् लाट सं्‍ ा 304 कब उत् तर

सीमा ृर जदन् िु ‘ ’ ृर जमलती िज

– ग :

रे ा जदन् िु ‘ ’ से आरंभ िोकर ग्राम वनोिा में प् लाट सं्‍ ांक 32, 35, 36, 34, 39, 38, 43, 55/2-

55/3, 85/1, 84/14, 101, 102, 100, 99 कब दाह्य सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई िाती िज और सड़क

ृर जस्ट् त जदन् िु 'ग' ृर जमलती िज

ग - ष :

रे ा जदन् िु ‘ग’ से आरंभ िोकर उत् तर-ृूवय दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ ांक 98, 94 कब दाह्य सीमा से लगकर

िोती हुई सड़क ृार करती िज दफर प् लाट सं्‍ ांक 214, 213, 224, 228, 230 कब दाह्य सीमा से

लगकर िोती हुई ग्राम वनोिा और ग्राम नगाला री कब सजम् मजलत ग्राम सीमा ृर जस्ट् त जदन् िु 'ष' ृर

जमलती िज

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट् त 29, 2020/भाद्र 7, 1942

2237

ष - ड. :

रे ा जदन् िु ‘ष’ से आरंभ िोकर उत् तर दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ ांक 22, 25, 29 कब दाह्य सीमा से लगकर

गुिरती हुई िाती िज और ग्राम नगाला री और ग्राम ना िेव कब सजम् मजलत ग्राम सीमा ृर जस्ट् त जदन् िु

'ड.’ ृर जमलती िज

ड.–च-छ : रे ा जदन् िु ‘ड.’ से आरंभ िोकर उत् तर दििा में ग्राम ना िेव में प् लाट सं्‍ ांक 9, 11, 12, 46 कब दाह्य

सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई जदन् िु ‘च’ से िोती हुई गुिरती िज और ृजश् चम दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ ांक 46,

45, 44, 43 कब दाह्य सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई गुिरती िज और ग्राम ना िेव और ग्राम चप र टी कब

सजम् मजलत ग्राम सीमा ृर जस्ट् त जदन् िु 'छ’ ृर जमलती िज

छ-ि–झ : रे ा जदन् िु ‘छ’ से आरंभ िोकर ृजश् चमी दििा में ग्राम चप र टी में प् लाट सं्‍ ांक 413, 412, 419,

420, 452, 451, 416, 463 कब दाह्य सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई िाती िज दफर जदन् िु ‘ि’ से िोकर,

िजक्षण दििा में एकोणा- ओसी ृरर ोिना के जल े ृूवय में अर्ियत कब गई भूजम कब सीमा से लगकर

िोती हुई िाती िज और ग्राम चप र टी और ग्राम वनोिा कब सजम् मजलत ग्राम सीमा ृर जस्ट् जत जदन् िु ‘झ’

ृर जमलती िज

झ – ञ : रे ा जदन् िु ‘झ’ से आरंभ िोकर िजक्षण दििा में ग्राम वनोिा में एकोणा- ओसी िान के जल े ृूवय में

अर्ियत भूजम कब सीमा से लगकर गुिरती हुई िाती िज और ग्राम वनोिा और ग्राम माडाय कब सजम् मजलत

ग्राम सीमा ृर प् लाट सं्‍ ा 132 के िजक्षण-ृजिम छोर ृर जस्ट् त जदन् िु ‘ञ’ ृर जमलती िज

ञ – ट : रे ा जदन् िु ‘ञ’ से आरंभ िोकर ग्राम माडाय में एकोणा- ओसी िान के जल े ृूवय में अर्ियत भूजम से

लगकर िोती हुई सड़क ृार करती िज और ग्राम एकोणा और ग्राम माडाय कब सम् जमजलत ग्राम सीमा

जस्ट् त जदन् िु ‘ट’ ृर जमलती िज

ट - :

रे ा जदन् िु ‘ट’ से आरंभ िोकर ग्राम एकोणा में उत् तर-ृजश् चम दििा में एकोणा- ओसी िान के जल े

ृूवय में अर्ियत भूजम कब सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई िाती िज और निर के िजक्षण तट ृर जस्ट् त जदन् िु ‘ ’

ृर जमलती िज

- ड :

रे ा ग्राम एकोणा में जदन् िु ‘ ’ से आरंभ िोकर निर के िजक्षण तट से लगकर ृजश् चम दििा से िोती हुई

गुिरती िज और जदन् िु ‘ड’ ृर जमलती िज

ड - ढ :

रे ा निर के िजक्षण तट ृर जस्ट् त जदन् िु ‘ड’ से आरंभ िोकर िजक्षण दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ ांक 82, 93, 94,

121, 122, 123, 125 कब दाह्य सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई सड़क ृार करती िज दफर एकोणा -II ओसी

िान के जल े ृूवय में अर्ियत भूजम कब सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई गुिरती िज और ग्राम एकोणा और ग्राम

माडाय कब सजम् मजलत ग्राम सीमा ृर जस्ट् त जदन् िु ‘ढ’ ृर जमलती िज

ढ - ण :

रे ा जदन् िु ‘ढ’ से आरंभ िोकर ग्राम माडाय में िजक्षण-ृूवय दििा में एकोणा - ओसी िान के जल े ृूवय में

अर्ियत भूजम कब सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई गुिरती िज और सड़क के जनकट प् लाट सं्‍ ा 181/1 के

िजक्षण-ृूवय छोर ृर जस्ट् त जदन् िु ‘ण’ ृर जमलती िज

ण - त :

रे ा जदन् िु ‘ण’ से आरंभ िोकर ग्राम माडाय में िजक्षण-ृूवय दििा में एकोणा - ओसी िान के जल े ृूवय में

अर्ियत भूजम कब उत् तर सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई गुिरती िज और प् लाट सं्‍ ा 261 के िजक्षण-ृूवय छोर

ृर जस्ट् त जदन् िु ‘त’ ृर जमलती िज

त - :

रे ा जदन् िु ‘त’ से आरंभ िोकर िजक्षण दििा से िोती हुई एकोणा - ओसी िान के जल े ृूवय में अर्ियत

भूजम कब ृूवय सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई ृार करती िज और ग्राम माडाय में प् लाट सं्‍ ा 310 के िजक्षण-

ृजश् चम छोर ृर जस्ट् त जदन् िु ‘ ’ ृर जमलती िज

2238 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 29, 2020/BHADRA 7, 1942

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

- क :

रे ा जदन् िु ‘ ’ से आरंभ िोकर ृूवय दििा में सड़क से लगकर िोती हुई ृार करती िज और ग्राम वनोिा में

सड़क ृर जस्ट् त आरंजभक जदन् िु ‘क’ ृर समाप् त िोती िज

भाग - II

ि – ि :

रे ा विाय निी के उत् तर तट ृर जस्ट् त जदन् िु ‘ि’ से आरंभ िोकर ग्राम माडाय में िजक्षण-ृूवय दििा में प् लाट

सं्‍ ांक 25, 24, 23, 16, 441, 442, 10, 9, 8, 4 कब दाह्य सीमा से िोती हुई ृार करती िज और

जदन् िु ‘ि’ ृर जमलती िज

ि – न :

रे ा ग्राम माडाय में जदन् िु ‘ि’ से आरंभ िोकर ृूवय दििा में सड़क से लगकर िोती हुई दफर प् लाट सं्‍ ांक

323, 321 कब दाह्य सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई ृार करती िज और ृुन: सड़क से लगकर िोती हुई सड़क

के समीृ जदन् िु ‘न’ ृर जमलती िज

न – ृ :

रे ा जदन् िु ‘न’ से आरंभ िोकर उत् तर दििा में एकोणा - II ओसी िान के जल े ृूवय में अर्ियत भूजम कब

सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई ृार करती िज और जदन् िु ‘ृ’ ृर जमलती िज

ृ – फ :

रे ा ग्राम माडाय में जदन् िु ‘ृ’ से आरंभ िोकर उत् तर-ृूवय दििा में एकोणा - II ओसी िान के जल े ृूवय में

अर्ियत भूजम कब उत् तरी सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई सड़क ृार करती िज ृुन: एकोणा - II ओसी िान के

जल े ृूवय में अर्ियत भूजम कब सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई चलती िज और सड़क के समीृ जस्ट् त जदन् िु ‘फ’

ृर जमलती िज

फ - द :

रे ा जदन् िु ‘फ’ से आरंभ िोकर एकोणा-II ओसी िान के जल े ृूवय में अर्ियत भूजम कब सीमा से लगकर

िोती हुई ग्राम एकोणा में प् लाट सं्‍ ा 180 के उत् तर छोर ृर जदन् िु ‘द’ ृर जमलती िज

द – भ :

रे ा ग्राम एकोणा में जदन् िु ‘द’ से आरंभ िोकर ृजश् चम दििा में एकोणा - II ओसी िान के जल े ृूवय में

अर्ियत भूजम कब सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई िजक्षण दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ ा 180 कब दाह्य सीमा से लगकर

िोती हुई ृार करती िज और विाय निी के ृूवी तट ृर जस्ट् त जदन् िु ‘भ’ ृर जमलती िज

भ – ि :

रे ा जदन् िु ‘भ’ से आरंभ िोकर िजक्षण-ृूवय दििा में ृार करती िज और विाय निी के ृूवी तट ृर जस्ट् त

आरंजभक जदन् िु ‘ि’ ृर समाप् त िोती िज

[फा. सं. 43015/7/2019–एलए एण् ड आईआर]

राम जिरोमजण सरोि, उृ सजचव

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi, the 27th August, 2020

S.O. 719.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number

S.O. 59, dated the 15^th January, 2020 issued under sub-section (1) of section 7 of the Coal Bearing Areas

(Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and published in

the Gazette of India, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), dated the 18^th January, 2020, the Central Government

gave notice of its intention to acquire all rights in or over the lands measuring 974.98 hectares (approximately)

or 2409.17 acres (approximately) in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification ;

And whereas, the competent authority in pursuance of section 8 of the said Act, has made his report to

the Central Government;

And whereas, the Central Government after considering the report aforesaid and after consulting to the

Government of Maharashtra, is satisfied that the lands measuring 974.98 hectares (approximately) or 2409.17

acres (approximately) and all rights in or over such lands as described in the Schedule appended hereto, should

be acquired;

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट् त 29, 2020/भाद्र 7, 1942

2239

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 9 of the Coal Bearing

Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957, (20 of 1957) the Central Government hereby declares that all

rights in or over the land measuring 974.98 hectares (approximately) or 2409.17 acres (approximately) as

described in the Schedule are hereby acquired.

The plan bearing number C-I(E)III/JJMR/0620/959, dated the 18^th June, 2020 of the area covered by

this notification, may be inspected in the office of the Collector, District Chandrapur, Maharashtra or in the

office of the Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata -700 001 or in the office of the Head of

Department/Chief Manager, Western Coalfields Limited, Revenue Department, Coal Estate, Civil Lines,

Nagpur – 440 001, Maharashtra.

SCHEDULE

Amalgamated Yekona I and II Opencast Mine

Majri Area

District Chandrapur (Maharashtra)

[ Plan bearing number C-I(E)III/JJMR/0620/959, dated the 18^th June, 2020 ]

Part – I

All Rights :

Sl.

No.

Name of

Village

Patwari

Circle

number

Tahsil

District

Description of land

(in hectares)

Total

( in

hectares)

Rem-

arks

Tenancy

Govt.

Forest

1

Yekona

11

Warora

Chandrapur

37.08

0.50

-

37.58

Part

2

Marda

11

Warora

Chandrapur

172.63

7.80

-

180.43

Part

3

Wanoja

11

Warora

Chandrapur

319.93

18.85

-

338.78

Part

4

Charur Khati

10

Warora

Chandrapur

56.03

3.02

-

59.05

Part

5

Naydeo

10

Warora

Chandrapur

68.93

1.19

-

70.12

Part

6

Nagala Rith

10

Warora

Chandrapur

76.89

3.86

0.62

81.37

Part

Total :

731.49

35.22

0.62

767.33

Part - II

All Rights :

Sl.

No.

Name of

Village

Patwari

Circle

number

Tahsil

District

Description of land

( in hectares)

Total

( in hectares)

Remarks

Tenancy

Govt.

Forest

1

Yekona

11

Warora

Chandrapur

53.55

3.58

0.00

57.13

Part

2

Marda

11

Warora

Chandrapur

145.12

5.40

0.00

150.52

Part

Total :

198.67

8.98

0. 00

207.65

Grand Total : (Part I and Part II): 767.33 +207.65= 974.98 hectares (approximately)

or 2409.17 acres (approximately)

2240 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 29, 2020/BHADRA 7, 1942

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Part – I

(1) Plot numbers acquired in village Yekona :

82/1- 82/2- 82/3, 85, 86, 93/1/A-93/1/B, 93/2, 94, 95, 96, 117, 118, 119, 120/1/A -120/1/B, 120/2, 121/1-

121/2, 122/1, 122/2, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 134, 135/1-135/2-135/3, road.

(2) Plot numbers acquired in village Wanoja :

32/1- 32/2, 34/1/A- 34/1/B- 34/2/A- 34/2/B- 34/2/C, 35/1-35/2-35/3, 36, 37, 38, 39, 43/1- 43/2, 44, 45/1-

45/2/A- 45/2/B, 46/1- 46/2, 47/1- 47/2/A- 47/2/B- 47/2/C/1- 47/2/C/2, 48/1- 48/2, 49/1/A- 49/1/B- 49/2, 50,

51/1- 51/2, 52/1- 52/2/A- 52/2/B- 52/2/C- 52/2/D, 53/1- 53/2- 53/3, 54, 55/1- 55/2/A/1- 55/2/A/2A- 55/2/A/2B-

55/2/B- 55/2/C- 55/2/D- 55/3, 56/1- 56/2, 57, 58/1/A- 58/1/B- 58/1/C- 58/2, 59/1- 59/2, 60/1- 60/2, 61/1- 61/2-

61/3, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73/1- 73/2, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79/1- 79/2- 79/3/A- 79/3/B, 80/1-

80/2, 81/1- 81/2, 82/1- 82/2, 83, 84/1/A/1- 84/1/A/2- 84/1/B- 84/1/C- 84/2, 85/1/A- 85/1/B, 97, 98, 99, 100,

101/1- 101/2, 102, 103, 104/1- 104/2- 104/3, 105/1- 105/2, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110/1- 110/2, 111/1- 111/2, 112,

113, 114/1- 114/2, 115/1- 115/2, 116/1- 116/2- 116/3, 117/1- 117/2, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123/1/A- 123/1/B-

123/2, 124, 125, 127, 128/1- 128/2, 129, 130/1- 130/2, 131, 132, 133, 135, 136/1- 136/2- 136/3, 137, 138/1-

138/2, 139/1- 139/2, 140/1- 140/2, 141/1/A- 141/1/B- 141/1/C- 141/2, 142, 143, 144/1- 144/2, 145, 146/1-

146/2, 147, 148, 149/1- 149/2- 149/3, 150, 151, 157/1- 157/2, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167,

168, 169/1- 169/2- 169/3, 170, 171/1- 171/2, 172/1- 172/2, 173, 174, 175, 176/1/A- 176/1/B- 176/2, 177/1-

177/2, 178/1/A- 178/1/B- 178/2/A- 178/2/B- 178/3, 179, 180/1- 180/2, 181, 182, 183, 184/1- 184/2- 184/3, 185,

186, 187/1- 187/2, 188/1- 188/2- 188/3, 189/1- 189/2- 189/3, 190, 191, 192, 193/1/A- 193/1/B- 193/1/C- 193/2-

193/3, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198/1- 198/2, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206/1- 206/3, 207/1/A- 207/1/B-

207/2- 207/3, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212/1- 212/2, 213, 214, 224/1- 224/2- 224/3- 224/4, 225/1- 225/3, 226, 227/1-

227/3, 228/1/A- 228/1/C- 228/2/A- 228/2/C, 230/1- 230/2, 461, 462/1- 462/2, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 470,

road, nallah.

(3) Plot numbers acquired in village Charur Khati :

412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418/1- 418/2- 418/3, 419/1- 419/2, 420/1- 420/2, 451/1- 451/2/A- 451/2/B, 452,

453, 454/1- 454/2, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459/1- 459/2, 460, 461/1- 461/2, 462/1- 462/2, 463, 465/1- 465/2/1-

465/2/2- 465/2/3, 493, 494, 516, road, nallah.

(4) Plot numbers acquired in village Marda :

116, 117, 118/1- 118/2, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 126/1- 126/2, 127, 128, 129/1/A- 129/1/B- 129/2/B, 130/1-

130/2, 131, 133/1- 133/2, 134/1- 134/2, 135/1- 135/2, 136/1- 136/2, 149/1- 149/2/A- 149/2/B, 150, 151/1- 151/2,

152, 153, 154, 155/1- 155/2/A- 155/2/B, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161/1- 161/2, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169/1-

169/2, 170, 171/1- 171/2, 172, 173/1- 173/2- 173/3, 174/1- 174/2, 175/1- 175/2- 175/3/A- 175/3/B, 176, 177,

178, 179/1- 179/2, 180/1- 180/2, 181/1- 181/2- 181/3- 181/4, 182/1- 182/2, 183, 184/1- 184/2, 185/1- 185/2,

186/1- 186/2, 187/1- 187/2, 188/1- 188/2, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193/1- 193/2, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200,

201, 202, 203, 204, 205/1/A- 205/1/B- 205/2/A- 205/2/B, 206/1/A- 206/1/B- 206/2, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211,

212/1- 212/2, 213/1- 213/2, 214, 215, 216/1- 216/2- 216/3- 216/4, 217/1- 217/2, 218/1- 218/2, 219, 224, 247,

251, 252, 253, 254, 255/1- 255/2- 255/3, 256/1- 256/2, 257, 258/1- 258/2, 259, 260/1- 260/2, 261, 262, 263, 266,

304, 305/1- 305/2, 306/1/A- 306/1/B- 306/2, 307, 308/1- 308/2- 308/3, 309, 310, 313/1- 313/2, 314, road.

(5) Plot numbers acquired in village Naydeo :

9, 10, 11/1- 11/2, 12/1- 12/2- 12/3, 13/1- 13/2, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18/1/A- 18/1/B- 18/2/A- 18/2/B- 18/3- 18/4/A-

18/4/B, 19, 20/1- 20/2, 21/1- 21/2, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29/1- 29/2- 29/3- 29/4, 30, 31/1/A- 31/1B- 31/2,

32/1- 32/2, 33, 34, 35, 36/1- 36/2- 36/3, 37, 38/1/A- 38/1/B- 38/2/A- 38/2/B, 39, 40/1- 40/2, 41/1- 41/2, 42/1-

42/2, 43/1- 43/2, 44/1- 44/2- 44/3, 45/1/A- 45/1/B- 45/1/C- 45/2/A- 45/2/B- 45/2/C- 45/3/A- 45/3/B- 45/3/C,

46/2/A- 46/2/B.

(6) Plot numbers acquired in village Nagala Rith :

1, 2/1- 2/2, 3/1/A- 3/1/B- 3/1/C- 3/2/A/1- 3/2/A/2- 3/2/B- 3/2/C, 4, 5/1- 5/2, 6/1- 6/2- 6/3, 7/1- 7/2, 8, 9, 10/A/1-

10/A/2- 10/B/1- 10/B/2, 11/1/A- 11/1/B/1- 11/1/B/2- 11/2/A- 11/2/B, 12, 13/1/A- 13/1/B- 13/2- 13/3, 14/1- 14/2,

15, 16/1- 16/2- 16/3- 16/4, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21/1- 21/2, 22, 23/1/A- 23/1/B- 23/2, 24/1- 24/2- 24/3, 25, 29, Nallah,

Road.

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट् त 29, 2020/भाद्र 7, 1942

2241

Part - II

(1) Plot numbers acquired in village Yekona :

164/1/1- 164/1/2- 164/2/A- 164/2/B, 165, 166, 167/1- 167/2, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177/1-

177/2, 178/1- 178/2, 180/1A- 180/1B- 180/2- 180/3- 180/4- 180/5- 180/6- 180/7- 180/8, 181/1- 181/2- 181/3-

181/4, 182/1/A- 182/1/B- 182/2/A- 182/2/B, 183/1/A- 183/1/B- 183/2- 183/3/A- 183/3/B- 183/4- 183/5, 184/1-

184/2, 185/1/A- 185/1/B- 185/2, 190, 191, 192, 193, Government land.

(2) Plot numbers acquired in village Marda :

2, 3, 4, 5/1- 5/2, 6/1/A- 6/1/B- 6/2/A- 6/2/B, 7, 8, 9, 10/1/A- 10/1/B- 10/1/C- 10/1/D- 10/2- 10/3- 10/4, 11, 12,

13/1- 13/2, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23/1- 23/2, 24, 25, 26, 27/1- 27/2- 27/3- 27/4, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32/1-

32/2, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39/1/A- 39/1/B/1- 39/1/B/2- 39/2/A- 39/2/B- 39/2/C, 40, 41, 42/1- 42/2- 42/3- 42/4,

43, 44, 45/1- 45/2, 46/1- 46/2, 47, 48, 49/1/A- 49/1/B- 49/2, 50, 51, 52/1/A/1- 52/1/A/2-52/1/B/1- 52/1/B/2-

52/1/C/1- 52/1/C/2- 52/2, 53/1- 53/2- 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68/A/1- 68/A/2- 68/B-

68/C, 69/1- 69/2- 69/3- 69/4- 69/5, 70/1- 70/2, 71, 72, 73, 74, 76/1- 76/2, 275, 276, 277, 278/1- 278/2, 279, 280,

281, 282/1- 281/2, 283, 284/1- 284/2, 285, 286, 320/1/A- 320/A/2- 320/2, 321/1- 321/2- 321/3, 323/1- 323/2,

324, 441, 442, road, nallah.

Boundary description:

Part – I

A – B :

Line starts from Point ‘A’ at the Road near boundary of village Wanoja and Marda passes in North-

West direction along the common boundary of villages and meets at Point ‘B’ on East boundary of

Plot Number 304.

B – C :

Line starts from Point ‘B’ passes through village Wanoja along the outer boundary of Plot Numbers

32, 35, 36, 37, 39, 38, 43, 55/2- 55/3, 85/1, 84/14, 101, 102, 100, 99 and meets at Point ‘C’ at the

Road.

C – D :

Line starts from Point ‘C’ passes in North-East direction along the outer boundary of Plot Numbers

98, 97 crosses the Road, passes along the outer boundary of Plot Numbers 214, 213, 224, 228, 230

and meets at Point ‘D’ on the common village boundary of villages Wanoja and Nagala Rith.

D – E :

Line starts from Point ‘D’ passes in North direction along the outer boundary of Plot Numbers 22,

25, 29 and meets at Point ‘E’ on common village boundary of villages Nagala Rith and Naydeo.

E-F-G :

Line starts from Point ‘E’ passes in North direction in village Naydeo along the outer boundary of

Plot Numbers 9, 11, 12, 46 and passes through Point ‘F’ then passes in West direction along the

outer boundary of Plot Numbers 46, 45, 44, 43 and meets at Point ‘G’ on common village boundary

of villages Naydeo and Charur Khati.

G-H-I :

Line starts from Point ‘G’ passes in West direction in village Charur Khati along the outer boundary

of Plot Numbers 413, 412, 419, 420, 452, 451, 416, 463 then passes through Point ‘H’, then passes

in South direction along the boundary of the land already acquired for Yekona – I OC and meets at

Point ‘I’ on common village boundary of villages Charurkhati and Wanoja.

I – J :

Line starts from Point ‘I’ passes in South direction along the boundary of land already acquired for

Yekona – I OC and meets at Point ‘J’ at South-West corner of Plot Number 132 on common village

boundary of villages Wanoja and Marda.

J – K :

Line starts from Point ‘J’ passes through Marda village in West direction along the boundary of land

already acquired for Yekona – I OC crosses the Road and meets at Point ‘K’ on common village

boundary of villages Yekona and Marda.

K – L :

Line starts from Point ‘K’ passes through village Yekona in North-West direction along the outer

boundary of land already acquired for Yekona – I OC and meets at Point ‘L’ on the South bank of

Canal.

2242 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 29, 2020/BHADRA 7, 1942

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

L – M :

Line starts from Point ‘L’ in village Yekona passes along the South Bank of Canal in West direction

and meets at Point ‘M’.

M – N :

Line starts from Point ‘M’ on South bank of Canal passes in South direction along the outer

boundary of Plot Numbers 82, 93, 94, 121, 122,123, 125, then crosses the Road passes along the

outer boundary of land already acquired for Yekona – II OC and meets at Point ‘N’ on common

village boundary of villages Yekona and Marda.

N – O :

Line starts from Point ‘N’ passes in South-East direction in village Marda along with outer

boundary of land already acquired for Yekona – I OC Mine and meets at Point ‘O’ at the South-East

corner of Plot Number 181/1 near the Road.

O – P :

Line starts from Point ‘O’ passes in South-East direction along the North boundary of land already

acquired for Yekona – I OC Mine and meets at Point ‘P’ at the South-East corner of Plot Number

261.

P - Q :

Line starts from Point ‘P’ passes in South direction along the East boundary of land already acquired

for Yekona – I OC Mine and meets at Point ‘Q’ at South-West corner of Plot Number 310 in village

Marda.

Q – A :

Line starts from Point ‘Q’ passes in East direction along the Road and ends at starting Point ‘A’ on

Road in village Wanoja.

Part – II

R – S :

Line starts from Point ‘R’ on North Bank of Wardha River passes in South-East direction along the

outer boundary of Plot Numbers 25, 24, 23, 16, 441, 442, 10, 9, 8, 7 and meets at Point ‘S’.

S – T :

Line starts from Point ‘S’ in village Marda passes in East direction along the Road then passes along

the outer boundary of Plot Numbers 323, 321 then passes along the Road again and meets at Point

‘T’ at the Road in village Marda.

T – U :

Line starts from Point ‘T’ passes in North direction along the boundary of land already acquired for

Yekona – II OC and meets at Point ‘U’.

U – V :

Line starts from Point ‘U’ in Marda village passes along the North boundary of land already

acquired for Yekona – II OC in North-East direction crosses the Road then continues along the

boundary of land already acquired for Yekona – II OC Mine and meets at Point ‘V’ near the Road at

common village boundary of village Yekona and Marda.

V – W :

Line starts from Point ‘V’ passes through village Yekona along the boundary of land already

acquired for Yekona – II OC Mine and meets at Point ‘W’ at the North-East corner of Plot Number

180 in village Yekona.

W – X :

Line starts from Point ‘W’ passes in West direction along the boundary of land already acquired for

Yekona – II OC Mine then passes in South direction along the outer boundary of Plot Number 180

and meets at Point ‘X’ on East Bank of Wardha River.

X – R :

Line starts from Point ‘X’ passes in South-East direction along the Eastern Bank of River and ends

of starting Point ‘R’.

[F. No. 43015/7/2019-LA&IR]

RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Dy. Secy.

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट् त 29, 2020/भाद्र 7, 1942

2243

मानव संसािन जवकास मंत्राल

(उच् चतर जिक्षा जवभाग)

(रािभािा प्रभाग)

नई दिल् ली, 28 िुलाई, 2020

का.आ. 720.—केन् द्री सरकार, रािभािा (संष के िासकब प्र ोिनों के जलए प्र ोग) जन म, 1976 के

जन म 10 के उृ जन म 4 के अनुसरण में, मानव संसािन जवकास मंत्राल (स्ट् कूल जिक्षा एवं साक्षरता जवभाग) के

अंतगयत जनम् नजलज त का ायल ों को, ऐसे का ायल के प ृ में, जिसके 80 प्रजतित से अजिक कमयचारी-वषन् ि ने जिन् िी

का का यसािक ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जल ा िज, अजिसूजचत करती िज:-

[फा. सं.11011-2/2018-रा.भा.ए.]

संि कुमार जसन् िा, सं ु्‍ त सजचव

MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

(Department of Higher Education)

(O. L. UNIT)

New Delhi, the 28th July, 2020

S.O. 720.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purposes

of the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices under the Ministry of

Human Resource Development, (Department of School Education & Literacy) as office, whose more than 80%

members of the staff have acquired working knowledge of Hindi:—

1.

KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN, REGIONAL OFFICE ERNAKULAM, IGH ROAD,

KADAVANTHARA NEAR RAJIV GANDHI INDOOR STADIUM

2.

KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA THALASSERY DHARMADAM (PO), THALASSERY, DIST,

KANNUR, KERALA-670106

3.

KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA EZHIMALA, KV INS ZAMORIN EZHIMALA, KANNUR,

KERALA- 670310

4.

KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA NO-1, PALAKKAD, HEMAMBIKA NAGAR, KALLEKULANGARA

PO, PALAKKAD, KERALA-678009

1.

केंद्री जवद्याल संग न, क्षेत्री का ायल एणायकुलम, आई िी एच रोड , कड़वंतरा, रािीव गांिी इंडोर स्ट् टेजड म के

जनकट

2.

केंद्री जवद्याल तलश् श् ेरी, िमयडम (ृी.ओ.), तलश् िेरी, जिला कण् णूर, केरल- 640106

3.

केंद्री जवद्याल एजजमला, के.जव.आई.एन.एस. जामोररन, एजजमला, कण् णूर, केरल- 640310

4.

केंद्री जवद्याल नं. 1, ृाल्‍ काड़, िेमाजम् दका नगर, कल् लेकुलंगरा ृी.ओ., ृाल्‍ काड़, केरल- 648009

5.

केंद्री जवद्याल चेन् नीरकरा, ओमल् लूर ृी.ओ. ृत् तनंजतट्टा, केरल- 689644

6.

केंद्री जवद्याल कोल् लम, रामंकुलंगरा, कावनाड़ ृी.ओ. कोल् लम, केरल-691003

7.

केंद्री जवद्याल एस.ए.ृी., जतप वनंतृुरम, ृेप रकड़ा, केरल-695005

8.

केंद्री जवद्याल कडुत् तुप जत् त, एच एन एल ृररक्षेत्र, न् ूजपप्रंट नगर, वेल् लूर, कोट्टा म- 686616

9.

केंद्री जवद्याल केईृीए रामवमायृुरम, रामवमायृुरम, तषश् िूर, केरल-680631

10.

केंद्री जवद्याल एनटीृीसी, का मकुलम, चेप् ृाड़, ृी.ओ. का मकुलम - 690504

11.

केंद्री जवद्याल कण् णूर, जिला अस्ट् ृताल ृी.ओ. कण् णूर, केरल- 640014

12.

केंद्री जवद्याल , दी एस एफ, अरिृुर, ृोस्ट् ट : नारा णृुर, जिला : मालिा (ृजश् चम दंगाल)- 432141

13.

केंद्री जवद्याल क्रमांक 2, जदन् नागुड़ी कैंट, िलृाईगुड़ी, ृजश् चम दंगाल – 435232

14.

केंद्री जवद्याल , आसनसोल, डोमोिानी रेलवे कॉलोनी, ृोस्ट् ट: कल् ला, जिला : ृजश् चम दियमान – 413340

15.

केंद्री जवद्याल , एनएचृीसी जसगंताम, तीस्ट् ता (स्ट् टजि V), ृावर स्ट् टेिन, दलूतर, पसंगताम, पसंगताम – 434134

(ईस्ट् ट जसज्‍ कम)

2244 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 29, 2020/BHADRA 7, 1942

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

5.

KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA CHENNEERKARA, OMALLOOR PO, PATHANAMTHITTA,

KERALA-689647

6.

KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA KOLLAM, RAMANKULANGARA, KAVANAD P.O. , KOLLAM,

KERALA- 691003

7.

KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SAP THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PEROORKADA, KERALA-

695005

8.

KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA KADUTHURUTHY, HNL PREMISES, NEWSPRINT NAGAR,

VELLOOR, KOTTAYAM-686616

9.

KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA KEPA RAMAVARMAPURAM, RAMAVARMAPURAM,

THRISSUR, KERALA- 680631

10.

KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA NTPC KAYAMKULAM CHEPPAD, PO KAYAMKULAM- 690507

11.

KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA KANNUR, DIST HOSPITAL PO, KANNUR, KERALA-670017

12.

KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA BSF, ARADHPUR, POST : NARAYANPUR, DIST: MALDA (WEST

BENGAL) 732141

13.

KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA NO-2, BINNAUGURI CANTT., JALPAIGURI,

WEST BENGAL- 735232

14.

KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA, ASANSOL, DAMOHANI RAILWAY COLONY, POST: KALLA,

DIST : PASHCHIM BURDWAN 713340

15.

KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA, NHPC SINGTAM, TEESTA (STAGE V) POWER STATION,

BALUTAR, SINGTAM 737134 (EAST SIKKIM)

[F. No. 11011-2/2018-रा.भा.ए.]

SANJAY KUMAR SINHA, Jt. Secy.

श्रम एवं रोिगार मंत्राल

नई दिल्ली, 24 अगस्ट् त, 2020

का.आ. 721.——औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) कब िारा 17 के अनुसरण में

केन्द्री सरकार मेससय मु्‍ मिाप्रदंिक, भारत अ य मूवसय जलजमटेड, कोलार गोल्ड फबल्ड दैंगलोर, और अन् एवं

उनके कमयचारी के प्रदंितंत्र के संदद्ध जन ोिकों और उनके कमयकारों के दीच अनुदंि में जनर्ियि औद्योजगक जववाि में

केन्द्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न् ा ाल , दैंगलोर के ृंचाट (संिभय सं्‍ ा 24/2009) को प्रकाजित

करती िज िो केन्द्री सरकार को 30.06.2020 को प्राप्त हुए े

[सं. एल-14012/7/2009-आईआर (डी ू)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 24th August, 2020

S. O. 721.——In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, (14 of 1947) the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 24/2009) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in

relation to The Chief General Manager, Bharat Earth Movers Limited, Kolar Gold Field Bangalore & Others,

and their workmen which were received by the Central Government on 30.06.2020.

[No. L-14012/7/2009-IR(DU)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट् त 29, 2020/भाद्र 7, 1942

2245

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

BANGALORE

DATED : 19^TH JUNE, 2020

PRESENT: JUSTICE SMT. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

CR 24/2009

I Party

II Party

Sh. M Ramakrishnan,

Type A, No. 124, BEML Quarters,

BEML Nagar,

Kolar Gold Field – 563115.

The Chief General Manager,

Bharat Earth Movers Limited,

Hydraulic and Powerline Division,

BEML Nagar,

Kolar Gold Field – 563115.

Appearance

Advocate for I Party : Mr. B. L. Sanjeev

Advocate for II Party : Mr. N. S. Narasimha Swamy

AWARD

The Central Government vide Order No. L-14012/7/2009-IR(DU) dated 28.05.2009 in exercise of the

powers conferred by Clause (d) of Sub-Section (1) and Sub-Section2(A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute

Act, 1947 (for brevity ‘the Act’ hereafter) referred the following Industrial Dispute for adjudication.

“Whether the action of the management of Bharat Earth Movers Limited, in terminating the

services of their workman Sh. M Ramakrishnan, w.e.f. 19.01.2007 is legal and justified? If not,

what relief the workman is entitled to?”

1.

The dispute is raised by the Ex-employee of the 2^nd Party /BEML challenging the punishment order

imposed on him on the allegation of theft of Company property.

The workman claims that,

he joined the service of the 2^nd Party on 24.09.1959 as a Helper, he was promoted as Driver to Drive Heavy

Vehicles belonging to the 2^nd Party in the year 1973-74; he was issued charge Sheet on 26.02.2005 on baseless

allegations; he refuted the allegations. The 2^nd Party initiated Domestic Enquiry to probe into the charges;

during the Domestic Enquiry he was not afforded opportunity, the finding of the Enquiry Officer is totally

perverse and illegal. The Disciplinary Authority accepted the Enquiry Report and imposed the punishment

which is harsh, excessive and highly disproportionate. He had rendered unblemished service to the 2^nd Party for

37 years. The action of the Management in terminating him from service is a clear case of victimisation and

unfair labour practice. He is unemployed and has a large family to maintain.

2.

The claim is contested, allegations made by the 1^st Party workman against fairness of Enquiry,

Enquiry Report are denied and the punishment order is sought to be justified.

3.

In view of the rival pleadings touching the veracity of the Domestic Enquiry a Preliminary Issue was

raised, tried and adjudicated upholding the fairness and correctness of the Domestic Enquiry.

4.

1^st Party workman has adduced evidence that he is unemployed since his dismissal.

During his cross examination he admitted the punishment of dismissal from service imposed on him in

the year 1988 on the charges of theft – his reappointment as Driver-C – warning letter issued for not producing

documents relating to availment of Vehicle advance – suspension in the year 1997 on the charge of theft of Iron

pallets which was thereafter revoked by issuing a warning memo and another memo issued to him in the year

2001 alleging submission of fake bills to draw TA bills.

5.

Both parties have advanced arguments.

6.

The allegation against the workman is,

on 20.02.2005 while on duty in the Mini Lorry MYK 9892 he was caught red-handed; he had concealed five

items / properties of the 2^nd Party wrapped in a cloth and had hidden in the right-side door compartment in

between the outer iron sheet and inner plastic / iron panelling of the Lorry. The vehicle was searched by the

2246 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 29, 2020/BHADRA 7, 1942

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Vigilance Staff in the presence of Security Manager and the stolen articles were seized. The charge sheet also

referred to punishments imposed on four past occasions on the ground of misconduct. It was alleged that when

questioned by the Vigilance staff he feigned ignorance and started behaving in a very adamant manner and

refused minimum cooperation….

The above acts if proved, amount to misconduct under 21.3, 21.17, 21.38, 21.39 and 21.43 of the

Standing Orders of the Company.

7.

The workman submitted his explanation denying the charges.

8.

It was a two-member Enquiry Committee comprising Senior Manager H&P Division and Senior

Manager (HR) EM Division. The CSE was assisted by his co-employee.

9.

During the enquiry the Management examined six witnesses and 14 documents were exhibited. The

CSE opted not to cross examine fifth witness who had accompanied the CSE in the lorry for unloading at EM

Division.

No defence evidence was adduced.

10.

The first witness / MW-1 was the staff, as per his deposition, on 21.02.2005 from 6.30 am to 3.30 pm

he was on duty at H&P and R&D Divisions; he received an anonymous phone call informing that CSE is

carrying items unauthorisedly in the Mini Lorry MYK 9892; immediately he followed the vehicle, informed the

matter over phone to the Manager (Security/Vigilance), immediately he was provided assistance of two

Vigilance Inspectors to check the vehicle, when the vehicle came to the main gate of EM Division, they

checked the vehicle, the items were removed from the side door wrapped in banian cloth; three engineers were

summoned who identified that the items were from H&P Division, the items were sealed with the signatures of

CSE, Sugumara another employee in the lorry and others. Thereafter the CSE was permitted to leave the

factory premises.

The second witness / MW-2 was the Vigilance Inspector who headed the search, his deposition is in

conformity with the charge sheet allegation and statement of MW-1.

The third witness / MW-3 was another Vigilance Inspector who was in the search team. His statement

was in corroboration to the statements of earlier witness.

The fourth witness / MW-4 was the Manager (Security/ Vigilance / Fire Service).

The fifth witness / MW-5 was Sh. R. Sugumaran working as Group-B in the Stores Department. He

deposed that the lorry was checked near the Gate after they unloaded the items, after checking the vehicle the

Vigilance called him and asked him to open the door… the items packed in banian cloth were taken out from

the right-side door. They opened…asked him whether the items are correct, they took photograph…

The Presenting Officer elicited some clarification thereafter. Surprisingly, there is no cross

examination to this witness.

The sixth witness was Assistant Manager (Security) / MW-6, he deposed that he was the shift Security

Officer on 21.02.2005 about 11 am the Vigilance Officer / MW-1 called him to his Office and assigned the task

of identifying the materials seized from the Mini lorry driven by CSE. Accordingly, the three officers i.e. DGM

(Materials Management), AGM (Production) and Official from H&P Division were called and the materials

were identified. The said identification list is Ex M-3 and Ex M-14.

During cross examination he admits that he has not subscribed his signature to the above list.

11.

Appreciating the evidence of the prosecution, the Enquiry Committee found him guilty of the

misconduct. Of course, the finding is based on evidentiary material placed before Enquiry Committee only.

Still what disturbs the judicious conscious is, the stolen articles seized from the lorry was not placed before the

Enquiry Committee to mark them as evidence. The Enquiry Committee dwelled entirely upon the examination

in chief evidence and further clarification sought from the witness and ignored the outcome of the cross-

examination evidence of the witnesses. That impresses me to contain from endorsing the Enquiry finding.

12.

Sh. NSN for the 2^nd Party would submit since 1^st Party was a habitual, and did not dispute his past

records, the Disciplinary Authority has punished him with appropriate punishment.

13.

As per the submission at the bar, the properties alleged to have been stolen was scrap items and there is

no valuation of these items.

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट् त 29, 2020/भाद्र 7, 1942

2247

14.

When it is said that the seized articles were packed and sealed in the presence of the witnesses, affixing

the signature of the CSE and another employee Sh. Sugumaran / MW-5, the said material packed ought to have

been produced to exhibit the signatures, so also the material. Non production of the same, during Domestic

Enquiry is a serious lapse on the part of the prosecution which goes to the root of the matter.

15.

The Disciplinary Authority while proposing the punishment of dismissal from service of the Company

did not make independent assessment for the evidentiary material. The 1^st Party in his representation to the

proposal of punishment pleaded that it is the hand work of some of his adversaries since he would be an easy

bait, because of his past, they have cleverly implicated him by planting the material. He has further pleaded

“.....because of the resulting frustration I was not having a control of either over what I did or said anywhere

and everywhere and was given to accepting any and all suggestions that came my way because on my

own I was unable to use any discretionary power.”

The Disciplinary Authority without even referring to his explanation and without independent

appreciation of Enquiry material has imposed the punishment which falls short of reasoned and considered

order.

16.

Accepting that he was implicated 4 times of misconduct.

(i)

The first misconduct of theft was in the year 1988 for which he was removed and again reappointed,

indicating condonation of his past misconduct.

(ii) For the second time the punishment was a warning letter for non-production of vehicle documents

after availing vehicle advance from the company.

The Disciplinary Authority had reduced his salary by one stage which was later reviewed with the

warning memo.

The 1^st Party workman during his cross examination before this Court stated that he submitted the

records thereafter, the order was reviewed.

(iii) The third incident is of the year 1998 on the allegation of Theft of Company Iron Pallet which

ended with an advisory letter only.

(iv) The fourth incident is of 2001 whereby he was issued advisory letter for the allegation of Fake and

Bogus Lodge Bills.

The above past records are insufficient to brand him a habitual.

17.

For the above reason I hold, the punishment imposed on the workman is not legal and not justified.

Now he has crossed the age of superannuation and the question of reinstatement will not arise, the only relief

for him could be by way of monetary compensation for the years of service lost because of the punishment

order dated 19.01.2007. In the opinion of this Tribunal back wages at 60% from the date of the punishment

order till the date of his superannuation is the appropriate relief for him.

AWARD

The Reference is accepted.

The action of the 2^nd Party / Bharat Earth Movers Limited in terminating the services of the 1^st Party

workman Sh. M. Ramakrishnan is not legal and not justified.

The 2^nd Party is directed to treat him as on continuous duty until the date of his superannuation and

release his back wages at 60% from 19.01.2007 to the date of his superannuation within 60 days of publication

of the Award otherwise the amount shall carry future interest at 6%.

(Dictated to o/s Steno, transcribed by her, corrected and signed by me on 19^th June, 2020)

JUSTICE SMT. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

2248 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 29, 2020/BHADRA 7, 1942

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 24 अगस्ट् त, 2020

का.आ. 722.——औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) कब िारा 17 के अनुसरण में

केन्द्री सरकार मेससय जनिेिक, अजतररि मिाप्रदंिक (आईआर), भारत इले्‍रॉजन्‍स जलजमटेड, दंगलौर, और अन्

एवं उनके कमयचारी के प्रदंितंत्र के संदद्ध जन ोिकों और उनके कमयकारों के दीच अनुदंि में जनर्ियि औद्योजगक जववाि

में केन्द्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न् ा ाल , दैंगलोर के ृंचाट (संिभय सं्‍ ा 06/2020) को प्रकाजित

करती िज िो केन्द्री सरकार को 12.07.2020 को प्राप्त हुआ ा

[सं. एल-40011/1/2020-आईआर (डी ू)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 24^th August, 2020

S. O. 722.——In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, (14 of 1947) the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 06/2020) of the Central Government Industrial-Tribunal-cum

Labour Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to The Additional General Manager (IR), Bharat Electronics Limited, Bangalore & Others, and their workmen

which were received by the Central Government on 12.07.2020.

[No. L-40011/1/2020-IR(DU)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIUBNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

BANGALORE

DATED : 23^rd JUNE 2020

PRESENT : JUSTICE SMT. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

C R No. 06/2020

I Party

II Party

The President,

Bharat Electronics Workers Union,

C/o B E L, PO – Jalahalli,

BANGALORE – 560 013.

The Additional General Manager (IR),

Bharat Electronics Limited,

PO – Jalahalli,

BANGALORE – 560 013.

Appearances :

I Party :

Self

II Party :

None

1.

The Government of India, Ministry of Labourvide order No. L-40011/1/2020-IR(DU) dated 13.02.2020

in exercise of the power conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred as “The Act”) (14 of 1947) referred the following Industrial

Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

SCHEDULE

“Whether a superannuated person can be treated as workman under the ID Act, 1947, if so,

whether the action of the management of M/s Bharat Electronics Ltd in reducing the basic pay

by one stage of Shri Mohan M.L. vide order dated 18.8.2017 is legal and justified? If not, to

what relief the workman is entitled to?”

2.

On receipt of the reference order, notice was issued to both parties. 1^st Party appeared in person and

submitted that a similar matter is Registered in CR No. 06/2020 and he would be persuing the same and files a

Memo which reads thus :

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट् त 29, 2020/भाद्र 7, 1942

2249

“The First Party above names most respectfully submits as follows.

The First Party most respectfully prays that this Hon’ble Tribunal may pleased permit him to

prosecute the CR 5/2020, and permit him to withdraw the above dispute, the same reference in

CR 5/2020 to meet ends of justice and equity.’’

3.

In view of the memo filed by the 1^st Party, I pass the following Order.

AWAR D

Reference is Rejected.

(Dictated to U D C, transcribed by him, corrected and signed by me on 23^rd June 2020)

JUSTICE SMT. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 24 अगस्ट् त, 2020

का.आ. 723.——औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) कब िारा 17 के अनुसरण में

केन्द्री सरकार मेससय अिीक्षण ृुरातत्वजवि, भारती ृुरातत्व सवेक्षण दैंगलोर, और अन् एवं उनके कमयचारी के

प्रदंितंत्र के संदद्ध जन ोिकों और उनके कमयकारों के दीच अनुदंि में जनर्ियि औद्योजगक जववाि में केन्द्री सरकार

औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न् ा ाल , दैंगलोर के ृंचाट (संिभय सं्‍ ा 07/2014) को प्रकाजित करती िज िो

केन्द्री सरकार को 26.06.2020 को प्राप्त हुआ ा

[सं. एल-42011/10/2014-आईआर (डी ू)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 24^th August, 2020

S. O. 723.——In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, (14 of 1947) the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 07/2014) of the Central Government Industrial-Tribunal-cum

Labour Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to The Superintending Archeologist, Archeological Survey of India , Bangalore & Others, and their workmen

which were received by the Central Government on 26.06.2020.

[No. L-42011/10/2014-IR(DU)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

BANGALORE

DATED : 16^TH JUNE, 2020

PRESENT : JUSTICE SMT. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

CR 07/2014

I Party

II Party

Sh. ARM Ismail, President,

ASI Karmikara Sangha,

Saptagiri Complex,

K. C. Road,

Bellary – 583740.

The Superintending Archeologist,

Archeological Survey of India,

5^th Floor, Kendriya Sadan,

17^th Main, Kormangala,

Bangalore – 560034.

Appearance

Advocate for I Party : Mr. Muralidhara

Advocate for II Party : Mr. Sathish. B

2250 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 29, 2020/BHADRA 7, 1942

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AWARD

The Central Government vide Order No. L-42011/10/2014-IR(DU) dated 10.03.2014 in exercise of the

powers conferred by Clause (d) of Sub-Section (1) and Sub-Section2(A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute Act,

1947 (for brevity ‘the Act’ hereafter) referred the following Industrial Dispute for adjudication.

“Whether the action taken by the management of ASI Kamalapur is justified in their action of

discontinuation / stopping of Rs. 1000 as ex-gratia / special increment to its 43 number of

workmen is proper legal and justified, If not to what relief the said workmen are entitled for?”

1.

The 1^st Party Trade Union has espoused cause of 43 workmen who have suffered loss of ex-gratia /

special increment of Rs. 1,000/- each by the Order of the 2^nd Party.

2.

It is claimed that,

the 1^st Party workmen are casual workers employed in the Kamalapur Sub Circle of the 2^nd Party /

Establishment -1. The Government of India, vide G.O of November 2009 ordered payment of Rs. 1,000/- per

month as ex-gratia / special increment in addition to their daily rated wages w.e.f. 01.04.2009. This Order was in

respect of those daily wagers who had completed 10 years of service as on 20.02.2009 and continued in service

as on 01.04.2009 and who work on all the working days of the month. In respect of workers who had not

worked throughout the month, proportionate payment would be made. The 2^nd Party Management did not

comply the above Order and did not grant the benefit of additional increment.

It is further claimed that, before the Regional Labour Commissioner during conciliation the 2^nd Party

contended that members of the 1^st Party are not engaged continuously and could not be paid additional amount

unless their eligible with regard to completion of 10 years of service is verified, they also objected that these

workers were engaged by Government of India and were not eligible for additional increment as notified by the

State Government. In the course of conciliation, they had firstly agreed to pay increment of Rs. 1,000/- per

month from 01.04.2009. That amounts to a settlement under Sec 12(3) of Industrial Dispute Act 1947. They

have paid increment for the period 01.04.2009 to 31.10.2013 also. The Management is not legal in stopping the

payment of additional increment from November 2013 without seeking fresh order from Regional Labour

Commissioner. The Archaeological Department covers both Central and State Government, all of them have

completed ten and more years of service continuously. Before discontinuing the payment, they are not issued

notice. Additional increment was granted since the wages paid to them is meagre. Action of the 2^nd Party is not

sustainable.

3.

The 2^nd Party counter the claim on following lines:

that, the 2^nd Party is not an Industry falling under the purview of the Sec 2 of ‘the Act’, all the statutory duties

entrusted to ASI are the sovereign functions of the State. Its duties are not a business or trade; therefore, it is not

an Industry. As per the guidelines contained in the order G.O. No. DPAR 34 SLC 2012 dated 31.07.2012 issued

by DPAD Government of Karnataka increment of Rs. 1,000/- is payable to all casual labourers who have

rendered service as on 20.02.2009, the increment is payable from 01.04.2009. As per the O.M.

No. 7/24/2007/E.III(A) dated 05.10.2012, issued by Ministry of Finance, Department of Expenditure, New

Delhi, the casual workers should be paid ad-hoc bonus if they have worked for more than 240 days in each year

for 3 years or more. The Senior Conservation Assistant, Kamalapura was asked to comprise the details of the

eligible casual labourers for payment of additional increment of Rs. 1,000/- w.e.f. 01.04.2009 and bonus for the

year 2011-12, with the estimation of total amount to be paid. While calculating the additional increment

proportionate amount has to be arrived if a casual labour has not worked during all the working days in a month

and the casuals are paid additional increment w.e.f 01.04.2009, as per the earlier order of DPAD dated

11.06.2009. The 2^nd Party / ASI is a Central Government Organisation under Ministry of Culture, casual

labourers engaged in Kamalapura for conservation are paid against the approved estimates and as per schedule

of rates, they are not eligible for the ex-gratia payment of Rs. 1,000/- per month announced by Government of

Karnataka. The order of the Karnataka Government dated 11.06.2009 was issued on the basis of the Statement

made in the legislative assembly on 20.02.2009 during the discussions on the State budget. It is open for State

Government to make provision for payment of any extra amount to the daily wage employees in addition to

daily wage fixed as per Government Order from time to time. The Central Government for the purpose of

making payment of wages for daily wage employees has to follow similar norms, instead of Central

Government itself making an exercise of fixing wages.

The Order was issued by the Central Government in that behalf to follow all the decision of the State

Government extending certain monetary benefits to the daily wage employees over and above the payment of

daily wages. Thus, the Central Government Department is required to pay wages as per the schedule of rates

fixed by the State Government but not any extra payment. The Central Government has not taken decision to

make such extra payment to daily wages employees other than the normal daily wages payable to them.

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट् त 29, 2020/भाद्र 7, 1942

2251

The Central Government standing counsel has given opinion that casual labourers engaged by ASI are

not entitled for payment of extra amount of Rs. 1,000/- per month as per the Karnataka Government Order dated

11.06.2009. Therefore the 2^nd Party discontinued the payment of additional amount of Rs. 1,000/- from

November 2013 they have paid ad-hoc bonus as applicable to Central Government casual labourers. The 1^st

Party workmen were engaged intermittently for works of casual nature; they have not worked continuously for

240 days in any of the year.

4.

Respective documents produced by the parties are marked by consent, Ex M-1 to Ex M-8 are the

Management document and Ex W-1 to Ex W-6 are the 1^st Party Union’s documents.

5.

The perimeter of the schedule to the Order of Reference is limited to sort out legality or otherwise of

stoppage of Rs. 1,000/- ex-gratia or increment to the 43 workmen.

Undisputedly, the Archaeological Survey of India has the main function of exploring, excavating,

conserving, protecting the monuments and sites of National and International importance. That also includes,

maintenance of records, Survey, latest developments and publications, and the contact information is operated

under the Ministry of Culture. During the course, of its administration and governance, it engages casual

workers / daily wagers also through the Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms. As such, the

administration and finance of the 2^nd Party are not governed by any Orders or Notifications of State of

Karnataka, it is the Department of Finance and Expenditure, New Delhi which determines the rates of payments,

ad-hoc bonus etc., payable to the casual labourers engaged by the 2^nd Party. The State of Karnataka vide its

Order dated 31.07.2012, declared additional increment of Rs. 1,000/- to the casual labourers who have rendered

continuous service for more than 10 years as on 20.02.2009. In the usual course, the 2^nd Party fixes the wages in

accordance with the State Government schedule of rates fixed by the PWD and usually follows the similar

norms. But there is no such prescribed procedure or law to follow all the decisions of the State Government,

thereby extending certain monetary benefits other than the wages as rated. In that view of the matter, the 1^st

Party cannot dwell upon the circular / Ex W-1 dated 02.07.2009 granting ex-gratia of Rs. 1,000/- other than the

daily wages given to its employees working in different Departments.

6.

The 1^st Party does not dispute the fact that, the casual workers who have worked for 240 days for each

year for more than three years are getting the ad-hoc bonus as per the rates prescribed. That being the position,

the 1^st Party cannot demand benefits of the Order passed by the State Government under Ex W-1. Now the

grievance is, the ex-gratia amount so paid to the workmen for the period 01.04.2009 to 31.10.2013 is

unilaterally discontinued. Hence, it is contrary to the principles of natural justice.

7.

To say that, the 1^st Party deserved a notice before discontinuing the facility of additional increment /

ex-gratia is patently misconceived. It is only when an Employer proposes change in the condition of service, he

is required to issue notice of change to the parties affected. Schedule 4 of the Act lists the instances of service

of change from item No. 1 to 11. But the issue of ex-gratia is not covered by any of these items. Of course,

item No. 1 depicts “wages” including period and mode of payment. The definition clause at Sec 2(rr) does not

encompass in itself ex-gratia / additional interest accorded to the workmen to the temporary period relying on

the Policy of the State Government. The 1^st Party cannot insist to continue the benefit which was given to them

on the basis of the Order of the State Government, as such an error or mistake cannot be compelled to continue

for infinite period.

8.

It is shown by the 2^nd Party that, they have taken the legal advice that,

“….the 2^nd Party may classify the daily wages employees employed by them and find out as to whether

particular category of employee is entitled for which rate fixed by the PWD of the State Government.

After completing that exercise only, the Department may decide to make payment on par with the

Schedule of rates specified in the State Government order dated 23.06.2009”.

Perhaps, it took upto 24.03.2013 for the Officials to sort out that the workers engaged for particular work

are not the daily wagers. Ex M-1 is addressed by the Superintendent Engineer of PWD and IWTD, Bellary

circle to the 2^nd Party. It appears thereafter the payment of ex-gratia is discontinued from 31.10.2013 onwards.

Thus, the action of the Management of ASI Kamalapur / 2^nd Party in discontinuing / stopping Rs. 1,000/- per

month as ex-gratia / special increment to its 43 workmen is justified.

9.

Sh. MD for the 1^st Party would submit that the workmen were working under the Archaeological

Department of Karnataka. But nowhere in the Claim Statement or from the documents produced by the 1^st Party

Ex W-1 to W-6, I find support to his contention. Consciously, they have approached the Labour Commissioner

(Central), Bellary seeking his intervention when the 2^nd Party discontinued the payment of the benefit of Rs.

1,000/- per month to the 1^st Party workmen. Even during the conciliation proceedings also, the claim was “the

employees / workmen working as daily wagers / irregulars etc., under Union Government are also eligible to

get the additional benefit of the order passed by the State Government dated 02.07.2009”.

2252 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 29, 2020/BHADRA 7, 1942

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Still, there remains a thin dispute with regard to the amount of ex-gratia so far paid to the 1^st Party

workmen for the period 01.04.2009 to 31.10.2013. No fault can be found with the 1^st Party for excess payment

of ex-gratia so paid and received. They are all casual workers who eke out their livelihood by their hard

physical labour. It is the 2^nd Party who applied the benefits payable to the daily wage employees working in the

various departments of the State Government and subsequently found that the 1^st Party workmen are not entitled

for the said benefit. What is paid in between 01.04.2009 to 31.10.2013 is consumed by the workers long back

and to insist for the recovery of the said amount at this point of time is too inhuman and illogical.

AWARD

The reference is partly accepted.

Though the action of the 2^nd Party in discontinuing/stopping Rs. 1,000/- per month as ex-gratia / special

increment to 43 1^st Party workmen is legal, the amount so paid to the workmen between 01.04.2009 to

31.10.2013 shall not be recovered from them.

(Dictated to o/s LDC, transcribed by her, corrected and signed by me on 16^th June, 2020)

JUSTICE SMT. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 24 अगस्ट् त, 2020

का.आ. 724.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) कब िारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्री

सरकार मेससय अिीक्षण ृुरातत्वजवि, भारती ृुरातत्व सवेक्षण दैंगलोर, और अन् एवं उनके कमयचारी के प्रदंितंत्र

के संदद्ध जन ोिकों और उनके कमयकारों के दीच अनुदंि में जनर्ियि औद्योजगक जववाि में केन्द्री सरकार औद्योजगक

अजिकरण एवं श्रम न् ा ाल , दैंगलोर के ृंचाट (संिभय सं्‍ ा 07/2015) को प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्द्री सरकार

को 26.06.2020 को प्राप्त हुआ ा

[सं. एल-42012/03/2015-आईआर (डी ू)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 24th August, 2020

S. O. 724.——In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 07/2015) of the Central Government Industrial-Tribunal-cum

Labour Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to The Superintending Archeologist Archeological Survey of India , Bangalore & Others, and their workmen

which were received by the Central Government on 26.06.2020.

[No. L-42012/03/2015-IR(DU)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

BANGALORE

DATED : 15^TH JUNE, 2020

PRESENT : JUSTICE SMT. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

CR 07/2015

I Party

II Party

Smt. Jayamma,

W/o Eranna,

R/o 2^nd Ward,

Near New Bus Stand,

Kamalapur, Hospet Taluk,

Bellary - 583221.

The Superintending Archeologist,

Archeological Survey of India,

5^th Floor, Kendriya Sadan

17^th Main, Koramangala

Bangalore - 560034.

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट् त 29, 2020/भाद्र 7, 1942

2253

Appearance

Advocate for I Party : Mr. N Dhananjaya

Advocate for II Party : Mr. Sathish B

AWARD

The Central Government vide Order No. L-42012/03/2015-IR(DU) dated 23.02.2015 in exercise of the

powers conferred by Clause (d) of Sub-Section (1) and Sub-Section2(A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute

Act, 1947 (for brevity ‘the Act’ hereafter) referred the following Industrial Dispute for adjudication.

“Whether the action of the management of Archaeological Survey of India, Kamalapur, Hampi

Sub-Circle, Karnataka in terminating the services of Smt. Jayamma, of Kamalapur, proper,

legal and justified? If not, to what relief to the said workman is entitled to?”

1.

The claim of the 1^st Party workman is,

she worked as a Causal Labourer from 1984 to1989 for more than 240 days in a year, but was removed from

service; she raised a dispute before this Tribunal and this Tribunal adjudicated her dispute by an Award. The

Award was challenged by the 2^nd Party before the Hon'ble High Court and the matter was remanded. The

matter was pending for more than 20 years before this tribunal, her Trade Union without consulting her

colluded with the management, withdrew the case by filing a memo. It was stated in the memo that the

Management has assured to reinstate her into service along with similarly placed workmen of the other cases.

In the absence of the 1^st Party workman, the 2^nd Party colluded with Union Office Bearers, prepared a seniority

list. On the basis of the list some of the workmen were reinstated to temporary post. Whoever gave Rs. 20,000/-

were posted for the Temporary Status, but her name is not included in the list; recently 2^nd Party has given

Temporary Status to 32 Ex-casual labourers even though they were not listed and had not worked 240 days in a

year. She approached the 2^nd Party requesting to reinstate her to the Temporary Status post but the Management

has not cared her request. The memo of withdrawing the reference case without the affidavit of the 1^st Party

workman is illegal. Hence, the claim for restoration of the reference and direct the Management to call for

Muster Rolls of the workmen from 1984 to 1989.

2.

The claim is contested and its maintainability is questioned by the 2^nd Party. It is contended that she

has not completed 240 days as per the eligibility criteria for conferment of temporary status as per DOPT O.M

Dated 10.09.1993; the monuments of Hampi is included under World Heritage list and comes under the

jurisdiction of ASI; excavation work was undertaken to expose the remains of the Historic Monument that

existed during the Vijayangara Empire. Labourers were engaged on casual basis for excavation and allied

work; it was a time bound project of ASI and was of seasonal nature. The casual labourers were not

continuously engaged. The 1^st Party workman was engaged as a casual labourer at ASI, Kamalapuram for

intermittent period, for works of temporary nature and their service used to be utilised whenever required for

works of causal nature, and as per availability of funds. The dispute raised by her in CR 70/1990 was closed as

withdrawn since a memo was filed by the Union; the Award was passed on 21.11.2011. As per the approval of

the Competent Authority, eligible casuals were granted Temporary Status as per DOPT guidelines for the list

prepared by the Committee; she did not fulfil the conditions as laid down in the DOPT O.M dated 10.09.1993.

The ASI is performing the statutory duty of maintaining monuments and museums, and controlling the flow of

tourist by levying nominal charges of entrance fees and it is not an ‘Industry’.

3.

On completion of the pleadings the 2^nd Party placed its evidence through the Deputy Superintending

Archaeologist of the 2^nd Party. The 1^st Party since remained absent on the said date, the witness was discharged

by treating the cross examination as Nil. Thereafter the 1^st Party workman remained continuously absent and

there is no rebuttal evidence.

4.

Written argument is submitted for the 2^nd Party.

5.

On the showing of the 1^st Party itself the dispute raised by her has already reached it’s logical end vide

Award of this Tribunal dated 21.11.2011 in CR No. 70/1990, said Award has become final without challenge.

There is no material to appreciate the claim that the 1^st Party workman that she served the 2^nd Party continuously

without break, which service could have earned her the benefit of Sec 25-B of ‘the Act’ and in that event she

could not have been removed from service without following the mandates of Sec 25-F of ‘the Act’. For want

of evidentiary material in support of her claim it cannot be held that she is terminated from the service. When it

is contended for the 2^nd Party that she is engaged as a casual labourer in a time bound project and was not

2254 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 29, 2020/BHADRA 7, 1942

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

entitled for Temporary Status, it follows that there was no such termination at all. The schedule to the order of

reference is misconceived.

AWARD

The Reference is rejected.

(Dictated to o/s Steno, transcribed by her, corrected and signed by me on 15^th June, 2020)

JUSTICE SMT. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 24 अगस्ट् त, 2020

का.आ. 725.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) कब िारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्री

सरकार मेससय अध् क्ष, कनायटक कर्मयकरा जितारक्षका समीजत, देंगलूर, और अन् एवं उनके कमयचारी के प्रदंितंत्र के

संदद्ध जन ोिकों और उनके कमयकारों के दीच अनुदंि में जनर्ियि औद्योजगक जववाि में केन्द्री सरकार औद्योजगक

अजिकरण एवं श्रम न् ा ाल , दैंगलोर के ृंचाट (संिभय सं्‍ ा 08/2013) को प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्द्री सरकार

को 30.06.2020 को प्राप्त हुए े

[सं. एल-42025/07/2020-आईआर (डी ू)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 24^th August, 2020

S. O. 725.——In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 08/2013) of the Central Government Industrial-Tribunal-cum

Labour Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to The President, Karnataka Karmikara Hitarakshaka Samithi ,Bangalor & Others, and their workmen which

were received by the Central Government on 30.06.2020.

[No. -L42025/07/2020-IR(DU)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

BANGALORE

DATED : 19^TH JUNE, 2020

PRESENT : JUSTICE SMT. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

ID 08/2013

I Party

II Party

Sh. Dinesh H,

S/o Hanumanthaiah,

Chikkamaranahalli,

Mahadevapura Post,

Nelamangala Taluk,

Bangalore Rural Dist - 562123.

1. The President,

Karnataka Karmikara

Hitarakshaka Samithi,

B.E.L Colony, Jalahalli Post,

Bangalore - 560013.

2. The General Manager (P),

Bharat Electronics Limited,

Jalahalli,

Bangalore - 560013.

Appearance

Advocate for I Party : Mr. Muralidhara

Advocate for II Party : Mr. A. Venkoba Rao &

Mr. N. S. Narashima Swamy

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट् त 29, 2020/भाद्र 7, 1942

2255

AWARD

1.

It is a claim by an individual workman under the provision of Sec 2-A (2)&(3) of the Industrial

Dispute Amendment Act, 2010 (for brevity ‘the Act’ hereinafter) against his immediate employer / Labour

Contractor/2^nd Party No.1 and the Principal Employer 2^nd Party No.2.

It is the claim of the 1^st Party workman that he was initially appointed on 02.11.2009 in Integrated

Circuit Division by Dr. B.R Ambedkar Co-operative Society as an Electrical Maintenance Worker in Coil

Winding Division of the 2^nd Party No. 2 /BEL; because of his active role in the strike resorted by the workmen

he was refused employment on 01.09.2011. However, matter was settled before the Assistant Labour

Commissioner (Central) and he was provided employment w.e.f 07.04.2012 by the 2^nd Party No. 1. He was

made to work as a Office Boy for which he gave representation to change over his work; meanwhile due to

health reasons he remained absent and proceeded on ESI leave from 10.05.2012, after recovery when he went

to report on 21.05.2012 another person was working in his place; he was informed to get Experience Certificate

to give a job in the skilled section. As per the instruction he obtained Experience Certificate on 24.05.2012 and

approached the 2^nd Party, but same was not accepted; he approached the conciliation Assistant Labour

Commissioner (Central), Bangalore; he is refused employment for not budging to the pressure of the

Management to come out of the Trade Union. Before refusing employment, no show cause notice / charge

sheet is issued to him. The refusal of employment by 2^nd Party No.1 and 2, amounts to Retrenchment but

without following the mandatory provisions of Sec 25-F of ‘the Act’.

2.

The claim is contested by 2^nd Party No. 1 and 2.

It is the case of the 2^nd Party No. 1 that 1^st Party joined the service as an Unskilled Helper on 02.11.2009 and

caused disturbance to the people entering the main Gate of BEL in the month of August 2011, despite reminders

he failed to mend his ways and therefore his services were dispensed from 01.09.2011. On his raising dispute at

the intervention of Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), they agreed to take him back to service and

settlement dated 22.02.2012 was arrived. After taking him back in terms of the settlement in the first week of

April 2012, he was posted to work at Bharat Electronics Quality Institute (BEQI), but he was not interested in

the work and there were complaints from the Principal Employer / 2^nd Party No.2; 2^nd Party No.2 being a

Defence Establishment mobile phones are not allowed, but the 1^st Party workman was brining the mobile phone

to work; he was communicated to adhere to the rules / policies; he remained absent without intimation on

10^th and 11^th of May 2012. In this regard 2^nd Party No. 2 complained that his unauthorised absence hampers the

work activities. 1^st Party gave his representation stating that he is not interested to work at BEQI and sought for

change of work and place, vide representation dated 11.05.2012. Thereafter he remained absent without

information, he has voluntarily abandoned the work.

3.

2^nd Party No. 2 has countered his claim on following lines:

he was working and was paid by the Contractor, the provisions of Industrial Dispute Act will not come to his

rescue; there is no Master and Servant relationship between 1^st Party and 2^nd Party No. 2; he will not come

under the definition of Sec 2(s) of ‘the Act’; he is not engaged by the 2^nd Party No. 2 for it’s work. They have

their own Rules and Regulations for recruitments, he has not gone through the said process. No appointment

letter is issued to him by the 2^nd Party No. 2.

4.

It is further contended for 2^nd Party No. 2 that they used to engage the Contract Labour for small time

work through Registered Contractor on certain terms and conditions stipulated in the Agreement of Contract.

2^nd Party No. 1 is one such contractor who engaged the 1^st Party workman; he is paid salary as per the

arrangements made by 2^nd Party No. 1. 2^nd Party No. 1 was having all sorts of rights and liabilities over him

and he was reporting and doing the work as per the directions and instructions of the 2^nd Party No. 1. His

allegation that he worked in Integrated Circuit Division on 02.11.2009 is not correct. He is not denied

employment by 2^nd Party No. 2 and they have not taken any action against him.

5.

The 1^st Party placed his evidence by way of affidavit and documents Ex W-1 to Ex W-13 are marked.

He was discharged without cross examination.

Argument is submitted by learned counsel for the 1^st Party and learned counsel for the 2^nd Party No. 2.

6.

Sh. MD for the 1^st Party submits that in the absence of cross examination on the affidavit evidence of

the 1^st Party workman, his case as remained intact. His removal from service without notice and for no reason

2256 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 29, 2020/BHADRA 7, 1942

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

is illegal and he has to be compensated monetarily by both the parties jointly and severally. The obligation of

the Principal Employer under Section 21 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 mandates

surveillance of the Principal Employer for prompt payment of the wages to the Contractor’s Employees. Hence,

along with the Contractor the Principal Employer also becomes liable to pay Retrenchment Compensation to the

workman jointly and severally with the Contractor.

7.

The relevant documents produced by 1^st Party are Ex W-1 his identity card issued by ESI Corporation;

Ex W-2 to Ex W-5 are the Photostat copies of the Service Certificate issued by Bharat Electronics Ambedkar

Co-operative Society Limited and two Wage Slips, Identity Card issued by Bharat Electronics Ambedkar Co-

operative Society Limited; Ex W-7 and Ex W-8 are the Photostat copies of the request letters to replace the

1^st Party workman by another person who is service oriented; Ex W-9 to Ex W-12 are the Medical Records in

proof of, 1^st Party availing the benefit of medical treatment in ESI Hospital and Ex W-13 is his Petition dated

07.06.2012 submitted to Labour Authorities.

8.

None of the above documents would establish his evidence that he was engaged by the 2^nd Party No. 2

/ Management through a Labour Contractor; on his own showing he is engaged by 2^nd Party No. 1 and is

refused employment w.e.f. 21.05.2012 without showing any cause and without monetary compensation in lieu

of his past service. 2^nd Party No. 2 being a Public Sector Establishment has it’s own recruitment Rules and

Procedure. In the absence of any credible evidence establishing that he was appointed by 2^nd Party No. 2 by

following Recruitment Rules applicable to the Company, the service if any rendered by him as a workman,

definitely is under the 2^nd Party No. 1 / who is the Contractor for the 2^nd Party No. 2. His claim is not against

Bharat Electronics Ambedkar Co-operative Society limited who had issued employment order.

9.

Vide letter Ex W-6 addressed to the ALC (C) 1^st Party has stated that he was working in Bharat

Electronics through Karmika Hitha Rakshaka Samithi as Contract Labour in I.C Division….. On 01.09.2011 his

Contractor Society removed him from service…. That by itself establishes that he was the employee of the

Contractor Society. On his reinstatement he worked for the very same Society as indicated by Ex W-7.

Definitely he is the employee / workman of the 2^nd Party No. 1 and he has to work out his remedy with the

2^nd Party No. 1 only. There is no document to presume that before refusing employment to him, 2^nd Party No. 1

had conducted any enquiry on the allegations which are reflected by the documents Ex W-1 and Ex W-8. Thus,

the refusal of employment by the 2^nd Party No. 1 amounts to Retrenchment as defined by Sec 2(oo) of ‘the Act’.

If he had worked continuously for 240 days preceding the date of refusal of employment they should have

dispensed with his service only after following the procedure contemplated by Sec 25-F of ‘the Act’ which is

not done by them. To say that the Principal Employer under Sec 21 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and

Abolition) Act, 1970, is jointly and severally liable with the Contractor to pay Retrenchment Compensation to

the workman is misconceived. The vicarious liability of the Employer towards the Contractor’s Employees is

only to the extent of surveillance of prompt disbursal of the wages to the Contractor’s Employees, and the

compliance of statutory obligations under the benevolent provisions of the statute which are applicable to the

concerned employees. It does not extend to overseeing of Statutory Compensation to the workman on his

removal by the Contractor.

10.

In view of the above the 1^st Party workman deserves an Award claimed by him against his immediate

Employer 2^nd Party No. 1 only.

AWARD

The Petition filed by Sh. Dinesh H under sec 2-A of the Industrial Dispute Act (Amendment Act,

2010) is partly allowed.

His claim against 2^nd Party No. 2 / General Manager (HR) Bharat Electronic Limited is rejected.

2^nd Party No. 1, the President, Karnataka Karmikara Hitarakshaka Samithi is directed to reinstate the

workman to his original post with continuity of service and with 75% of the back wages.

(Dictated to o/s Steno, transcribed by her, corrected and signed by me on 19^th June, 2020)

JUSTICE SMT. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट् त 29, 2020/भाद्र 7, 1942

2257

नई दिल्ली, 24 अगस्ट् त, 2020

का.आ. 726.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) कब िारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्री

सरकार मेससय अध् क्ष, कॉफब दोडय, दैंगलोर, और अन् एवं उनके कमयचारी के प्रदंितंत्र के संदद्ध जन ोिकों और

उनके कमयकारों के दीच अनुदंि में जनर्ियि औद्योजगक जववाि में केन्द्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम

न् ा ाल , दैंगलोर के ृंचाट (संिभय सं्‍ ा 13/2013) को प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्द्री सरकार को 30.06.2020

को प्राप्त हुआ ा

[सं. एल-42011/12/2013-आईआर (डी ू)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 24th August, 2020

S. O. 726.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 13/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in

relation to The Chairman, Coffee Board, Bangalore & Others, and their workmen which were received by the

Central Government on 30.06.2020.

[No. L-42011/12/2013-IR(DU)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

BANGALORE

DATED : 23^RD JUNE, 2020

PRESENT : JUSTICE SMT. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

CR 13/2013

I Party

II Party

The Joint General Secretary,

The Estates Staffs’ Union

of South India,

Karnataka Regional Office,

Meenakshi Nilaya,

Lakshmeesha Nagara, Main Road,

Chickmagalur - 577101.

The Chairman,

Coffee Board,

Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Veedhi,

Bangalore - 560001.

Appearance

Advocate for I Party : Mr. Muralidhara

Advocate for II Party : Mr. M. R. C. Ravi

AWARD

The Central Government vide Order No. L-42011/12/2013-IR(DU) dated 05.03.2013 in exercise of the

powers conferred by Clause (d) of Sub-Section (1) and Sub-Section2(A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute Act,

1947 (for brevity ‘the Act’ hereafter) referred the following Industrial Dispute for adjudication.

“Whether the action of the management of Coffee Board in denying pay scale and other benefits

of regular Group ‘D’ employees of Coffee Board to the 15 mazdoors and 1 maistry of CRSS,

Balehonnur (as mentioned in the list) is legal and justified? To what relief the concerned

workmen are entitled to?”

1.

The 1^st Party Trade Union has espoused the cause of its members who work as Mazdoors and Maistry

at Central Coffee Research Institute, Balehonnur.

The claim is,

2258 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 29, 2020/BHADRA 7, 1942

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

that the 2^nd Party Coffee Board in pursuance of its Business objectives has set up Central Coffee Research

Institute (CCRI for short) which is an integral part of Coffee Board Research Department. CCRI is engaged in

Research in the field of Coffee growing and improvement of the Coffee etc. The CCRI is located in 250 acres

of land at Balehonnur and has employed workers; they are granted pay scales on par with the Central

Government Employees in the appropriate grades of pay; the Coffee Board broadly follows Central Government

Rules and Regulations and wage scales in respect of its employees. The Coffee Board in addition to its

employees has also employed Non-Staff Workers (Mechanical, Electrical, Tractor Drivers etc., Maistries,

Mazdoors, Lab Assistants and Field Staff). The CCRI has appointed the 1^st Party workmen and have issued

appointment orders individually, they have been made permanent in their respective cadre; seniority list are

maintained for each cadre separately; for all practical purpose, they are treated as workers of Coffee Board but

they are not extended the benefit of Central pay scales as extended to the other employees of the Board; the

Mazdoors are paid on daily wage basis, which is revised periodically in accordance with Minimum Wage

Notification issued by Government of Karnataka under Minimum Wage Act. These workmen are discharging

the jobs vital to the Coffee Research Programmes but are paid less wages compared to the Regular Coffee Board

employees who are employed in the same category. Their pay scale is revised on implementation of Sixth Pay

Commission w.e.f. 01.01.2006; once in 6 months they get Dearness Allowance and Additional Dearness

Allowance, House Rent Allowance, Conveyance Allowance, Leave Travel Allowance and Medical Benefits etc.

In addition, they get post-retirement benefits such as Gratuity and Pension. There is no justification for the

2^nd Party to treat the 1^st Party workmen under Minimum Wage Notification, having adopted Central pattern of

pay scales and other benefits; the Coffee Board cannot deny same benefit to the workmen of CCRI, it is

discriminatory. The 1^st Party workmen are entitled to the same pay scales and other benefits that are received by

Coffee Board employees.

2.

The claim is contested on the following line :

The 1^st Party workmen were appointed as Mazdoors under the Plantation Labour Act / Minimum Wages Act;

they are not part of regular establishment of the Coffee Board and not governed by Central Civil Service Rules.

The Coffee Estate / Plantation of the Coffee Board at CCRI, Balehonnur, Chikmagalur District, is a Plantation

Industry and not a pure Agricultural Establishment; the Coffee farms are not doing pure commercial production

of Coffee, it is only for conducting research work in the field of technology for enhancement of production and

evolve packages of practices to control pest and diseases. The 1^st Party workmen are Non-Staff Maistries and

Mazdoors and their wages are fixed in accordance with Plantation Labour Act 1951, and Minimum Wages Act,

1948. The wages fixed by the Karnataka Government is in accordance with the Bipartite / Tripartite Settlement

arrived between the representatives of Planters’ Associations, Labour Unions and the Karnataka Government.

The nature of work, duties and responsibilities of Group D employees of Coffee Board are entirely different

from that of the Plantation Workers. In addition to the wages the workmen get following benefits :

a) Ex-gratia at 8.33%. EL wages – 15 days for mazdoors and 20 days for non-staff / maistries and two-

way travel expenses to their native place annually.

b) Non joint Field kamblies once in a year. Woollen Rugs once in two years.

c) Uniform to Non-Staff / Maistries once in a year.

d) Dispensary in the campus and medical reimbursement.

e) Sick leave wages by payment of 2/3^rd wages for 14 days per annum.

f)

EPF Contribution.

3.

It is further contended that, they are provided quarters, free water supply and school van facility for the

children; there is difference between the 1^st Party and the Group D employees of the 2^nd Party in the matter of

their responsibility, reliabilities, experience, confidentiality involved, functional need and requirements

commensurate with the position in the hierarchy; there is also difference in the work program of their

department, nature of contribution expected, extent of responsibility and accountability in discharge of diverse

duties and functions, freedom / limitation available or imposed in the discharge of duties, extent of powers

vested, dependence on superiors for the exercise of powers and coordination with other department etc. The

1^st Party cannot be equated to the regular Group D Employees of the board and cannot claim equal pay scales.

4.

The 2^nd Party has adduced its evidence through its Senior Liaison Officer reiterating the counter claim

averments and produced 11 documents in respect of the facilities made available to the 1^st Party workmen.

Though the 1^st Party cross examined him at length nothing fruitful emerged for the benefit of the 1^st Party.

There is no rebuttal evidence by the 1^st Party.

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट् त 29, 2020/भाद्र 7, 1942

2259

5.

The basis for the 1^st Party to claim wages and benefit on par with the regular employees of the Coffee

Board is that they are working in CCRI and said CCRI is established as a Wing of the Coffee Board. But this

notion is not based on any Government Notification / Order. The nature of work carried out in CCRI is limited

for Research only and the difference of Service Condition is well explained by the 2^nd Party. They are not

employed in accordance with the Service Rules of the Central Government, their Service Conditions are in

accordance with the Plantation Labour Act and their payment is under Minimum Wages Act, 1948. The

additional benefits they are enjoying as listed in the counter statement is over and above their statutory wages.

6.

Under the circumstance there is no justification in their claim and the 2^nd Party cannot be faulted for

denying the pay scale and other benefits of regular Group D employees of the Coffee Board to them. The claim

is without merit.

AWARD

The Reference is rejected.

(Dictated to o/s Steno, transcribed by her, corrected and signed by me on 23^rd June, 2020)

JUSTICE SMT. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 24 अगस्ट् त, 2020

का.आ. 727.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) कब िारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्री

सरकार मजससय अध् क्ष, कॉफब दोडय, दैंगलोर, और अन् एवं उनके कमयचारी के प्रदंितंत्र के संदद्ध जन ोिकों और

उनके कमयकारों के दीच अनुदंि में जनर्ियि औद्योजगक जववाि में केन्द्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम

न् ा ाल , दैंगलोर के ृंचाट (संिभय सं्‍ ा 17/2013) को प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्द्री सरकार को 30.06.2020

को प्राप्त हुआ ा

[सं. एल-42011/213/2012-आईआर (डी ू)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 24th August, 2020

S. O. 727.——In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 17/2013) of the Central Government Industrial-Tribunal-cum

Labour Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to The Chairman,Coffee Board, Bangalore & Others, and their workmen which were received by the Central

Government on 30.06.2020.

[No. L-42011/213/2012-IR(DU)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

BANGALORE

DATED : 23^RD JUNE, 2020

PRESENT : JUSTICE SMT. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

CR 17/2013

I Party

II Party

The Joint General Secretary,

The Estates Staffs’ Union

of South India,

Karnataka Regional Office,

Meenakshi Nilaya,

Lakshmeesha Nagara, Main Road,

Chickmagalur - 577101.

The Chairman,

Coffee Board,

Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Veedhi,

Bangalore - 560001.

2260 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 29, 2020/BHADRA 7, 1942

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Appearance

Advocate for I Party : Mr. Muralidhara

Advocate for II Party : Mr. M. R. C Ravi

AWARD

The Central Government vide Order No. L-42011/213/2012-IR(DU) dated 15.04.2013 in exercise of

the powers conferred by Clause (d) of Sub-Section (1) and Sub-Section 2(A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute

Act, 1947 (for brevity ‘the Act’ hereafter) referred the following Industrial Dispute for adjudication.

“Whether the action of the management of Coffee Board, Bangalore in denying the central

government pay scale and other benefits to the mazdoors (Listed in Annexure A) working at

CCRI, Balehonour, Chikmagalure is legal and justified? To what relief they are entitled?”

1.

The 1^st Party Trade Union has espoused the cause of its members who work as Mazdoors at Central

Coffee Research Institute, Balehonnur.

The claim is,

that the 2^nd Party Coffee Board in pursuance of its Business objectives has set up Central Coffee Research

Institute (CCRI for short) which is an integral part of Coffee Board Research Department. CCRI is engaged in

Research in the field of Coffee growing and improvement of the Coffee etc. The CCRI is located in 250 acres

of land at Balehonnur and has employed workers; they are granted pay scales on par with the Central

Government Employees in the appropriate grades of pay; the Coffee Board broadly follows Central

Government Rules and Regulations and wage scales in respect of its employees. The Coffee Board in addition

to its employees has also employed Non-Staff Workers (Mechanical, Electrical, Tractor Drivers, Maistries,

Mazdoors, Lab Assistants and Field Staff). The CCRI has appointed the 1^st Party workmen and have issued

appointment orders individually, they have been made permanent in their respective cadre; seniority list are

maintained for each cadre separately; for all practical purpose, they are treated as workers of Coffee Board but

they are not extended the benefit of Central pay scales as extended to the other employees of the Board; the

Mazdoors are paid on daily wage basis, which is revised periodically in accordance with Minimum Wage

Notification issued by Government of Karnataka under Minimum Wage Act. These workmen are discharging

the jobs vital to the Coffee Research Programmes but are paid less wages compared to the Regular Coffee

Board employees who are employed in the same category. Their pay scale is revised on implementation of

Sixth Pay Commission w.e.f. 01.01.2006; once in 6 months they get Dearness Allowance and Additional

Dearness Allowance, House Rent Allowance, Conveyance Allowance, Leave Travel Allowance and Medical

Benefits etc. In addition, they get post-retirement benefits such as Gratuity and Pension. There is no

justification for the 2^nd Party to treat the 1^st Party workmen under Minimum Wage Notification, having adopted

Central pattern of pay scales and other benefits; the Coffee Board cannot deny same benefit to the workmen of

CCRI, it is discriminatory. The 1^st Party workmen are entitled to the same pay scales and other benefits that are

received by Coffee Board employees.

2.

The claim is contested on the following line :

The 1^st Party workmen were appointed as Mazdoors under the Plantation Labour Act / Minimum

Wages Act; they are not part of regular establishment of the Coffee Board and not governed by Central Civil

Service Rules. The Coffee Estate / Plantation of the Coffee Board at CCRI, Balehonnur, Chikmagalur District,

is a Plantation Industry and not a pure Agricultural Establishment; the Coffee farms are not doing pure

commercial production of Coffee, it is only for conducting research work in the field of technology for

enhancement of production and evolve packages of practices to control pest and diseases. The 1^st Party

workmen are Non-Staff Maistries and Mazdoors and their wages are fixed in accordance with Plantation Labour

Act 1951, and Minimum Wages Act, 1948. The wages fixed by the Karnataka Government is in accordance

with the Bipartite / Tripartite Settlement arrived between the representatives of Planters’ Associations, Labour

Unions and the Karnataka Government. The nature of work, duties and responsibilities of Group D employees

of Coffee Board are entirely different from that of the Plantation Workers. In addition to their wages the

workmen are getting following benefits :

a)

Ex-gratia at 8.33%. EL wages – 15 days for mazdoors and 20 days for non-staff / maistries and

two-way travel expenses to their native place annually.

b)

Non joint Field kamblies once in a year. Woollen Rugs once in two years.

c)

Uniform to Non-Staff / Maistries once in a year.

d)

Dispensary in the campus and medical reimbursement.

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट् त 29, 2020/भाद्र 7, 1942

2261

e)

Sick leave wages by payment of 2/3^rd wages for 14 days per annum.

f)

EPF Contribution.

3.

It is further contended that, they are provided quarters, free water supply and school van facility for the

children; there is difference between the 1^st Party and the Group D employees of the 2^nd Party in the matter of

their responsibility, reliabilities, experience, confidentiality involved, functional need and requirements

commensurate with the position in the hierarchy; there is also difference in the work program of their

department, nature of contribution expected, extent of responsibility and accountability in discharge of diverse

duties and functions, freedom / limitation available or imposed in discharge of duties, extent of powers vested,

dependence on superiors for the exercise of powers and coordination with other department etc. The 1^st Party

cannot be equated to the regular Group D Employees of the board and cannot claim equal pay scales.

4.

The 2^nd Party has adduced evidence through its Senior Liaison Officer reiterating the counter claim

averments and produced 11 documents in respect of the facilities made available to the 1^st Party workmen.

Though the 1^st Party cross examined him at length nothing fruitful emerged for the benefit of the 1^st Party.

There is no rebuttal evidence by the 1^st Party.

5.

The basis for the 1^st Party to claim wages and benefit on par with the regular employees of the Coffee

Board is that they are working in CCRI and said CCRI is established as a Wing of the Coffee Board. But this

notion is not based on any Government Notification / Order. The nature of work carried out in CCRI is limited

for Research only and the difference of Service Condition is well explained by the 2^nd Party. They are not

employed in accordance with the Service Rules of the Central Government, their Service Conditions are in

accordance with the Plantation Labour Act and their payment is under Minimum Wages Act, 1948. The

additional benefits they are enjoying as listed in the counter statement is over and above their statutory wages.

6.

Under the circumstance there is no justification in their claim and the 2^nd Party cannot be faulted for

denying the pay scale and other benefits of regular Group D employees of the Coffee Board to them. The claim

is without merit.

AWARD

The Reference is rejected.

(Dictated to o/s Steno, transcribed by her, corrected and signed by me on 23^rd June, 2020)

JUSTICE SMT. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 24 अगस्ट् त, 2020

का.आ. 728.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) कब िारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्री

सरकार मजससय जनिेिक, भारती ृुरातत्व सवेक्षण,िनृ , नई दिल्ली, और अन् एवं उनके कमयचारी के प्रदंितंत्र के

संदद्ध जन ोिकों और उनके कमयकारों के दीच अनुदंि में जनर्ियि औद्योजगक जववाि में केन्द्री सरकार औद्योजगक

अजिकरण एवं श्रम न् ा ाल , दैंगलोर के ृंचाट (संिभय सं्‍ ा 41/2013) को प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्द्री सरकार

को 30.07.2020 को प्राप्त हुआ ा

[सं. एल-42025/07/2020-आईआर (डी ू)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 24th August, 2020

S. O. 728.——In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 41/2013) of the Central Government Industrial-Tribunal-cum

Labour Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to The Director, Archeological Survey of India, Janapath, New Delhi & Others, and their workmen which were

received by the Central Government on 30.07.2020.

[No. L-42025/07/2020-IR(DU)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

2262 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 29, 2020/BHADRA 7, 1942

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

BANGALORE

DATED : 10^TH JULY, 2020

PRESENT : JUSTICE SMT. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

ID 41/2013

I Party

II Party

Sh. Musalayya Naidu,

S/o Late B Achaiah,

Residing at Hampi Power House,

7^th Ward, Nethaji Nagar,

Hospet Taluk,

Bellary District - 583215.

1.

The Management of Archeological

Survey of India,

Represented by its Director of Museums,

Archeological Survey of India,

Janapath, New Delhi - 110011.

2.

The Superintending Archeologist,

Archeological Survey of India,

Bangalore Circle, 5^th Floor,

Kendriya Sadan, ‘F’ Wing,

17^th Main Road, Koramangala,

Bangalore - 560034.

Appearance

Advocate for I Party : Mr. N. S. Narasimha Swamy

Advocate for II Party : Mr. Sathish B

AWARD

1.

It is a petition filed under Sec 2-A of the Industrial Dispute Act, by the individual workman who

claims that,

he was appointed by the 2^nd Party as Office Assistant w.e.f 17.12.2001 and served continuously till 30.10.2012

on which date he was refused employment. He alleges that termination order in writing was not issued, he

worked as Office Assistance in Archaeological Museum, Hampi for 8 hours a day on week days; he has worked

continuously for more than 240 days in each of the calendar year; the refusal of employment to him amounts to

retrenchment as defined under Sec 2(oo) of ‘the Act’, without complying with the requirements of Sec 25-F of

‘the Act’. Therefore, he is entitled to be reinstated to his original post. Before terminating him from service he

was not issued any charge sheet nor any enquiry was contemplated.

2.

The claim is contested. The 2^nd Party in their statement countered the entire claim averments. It is

stated that,

1^st Party Sh. Musalayya Naidu worked as a temporary labourer in 2^nd Party Office as per the requirement of

service and availability of funds as per the allotments for the works in the 2^nd Party office; he was never

appointed as Office Assistant, but was engaged as temporary casual labour as and when required against the

sanctioned works of the Competent Authority; hence issuance of termination order does not arise. He has not

worked as office Assistant and there was no such post in the Archaeological museum; he was paid through hand

receipts; he has not worked 8 hours a day. He was not engaged between October 2006 to March 2010. For

want of sufficient funds 2^nd Party is not in a position to engage any casual labourer; he was orally intimated that

there are no funds to make further payments to the temporary casual labour. He is discontinued due to non-

availability of funds.

3.

Both parties have adduced their evidence by reiterating their respective stand. The 1^st Party has

produced 12 documents i.e. Ex W-1 to Ex W-12. Among them Ex W-4 to Ex W-10 are relevant for his case,

they are, copy of office order dated 02.06.2012 (Ex W-4) by Deputy Superintending Archaeologist according to

which the Departmental Promotion Committee accorded sanction for the payment of Minimum Wages to the

1^st Party workman along with 2 others at 1/30^th of the Minimum of pay in Pay Band - IS of Rs. 4,440 - 7,440 +

Grade Pay Rs. 1,300/- + Dearness Allowance as per VI^th Pay Commission Recommendations; Ex W-6 is the

Photostat copy of the Status of Casual Labourers submitted by the Assistant Superintending Archaeologist, to

the Deputy Superintending Archaeologist wherein it is shown that 1^st Party was appointed on 17.12.2001 and

worked for 258 days between 2002-03, 316 days between 2003-04, 290 days 2004-05, 314 days between

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट् त 29, 2020/भाद्र 7, 1942

2263

2005-06, 141 days between 2006-07, 282 days between 2010-11 and 296 days between 2011-12; Ex W-7 to Ex

W-10 are the hand receipts under which he received wages.

4.

Both parties have submitted their respective argument / written argument.

5.

It is a fact that 1^st Party was not issued any appointment order. The documents submitted by him

would demonstrate that he was a casual labour at Archaeological Museum, Hampi. Ex W-6 (status of casual

labourer) though is shown as a notarized copy, I fail to understand how the Notary Public could notarize a

Photostat copy without comparing the same with the original Official Document. Still giving the benefit of the

said Document, it is noticed that there is a break in his service between 2007-09 he was working continuously

between 2002-2007; after the break in service between 2007-2009, he has worked continually between 2010-

2012, as a casual labourer. Whatever may be the nature of the service rendered by him against the sanctioned

project work, facts remain that he is not appointed to any Public Office in accordance with the recruitment

Rules and Procedure contemplated for any Public Post.

6.

The document Ex W-6 is contradictory to his own case that he has served the 2^nd Party from the year

2001 to 2012. As per Ex W-6 though he had worked continuously for more than 240 days in each of the

calendar year between 2002-03 upto 2005-06, in the year 2006-07 he had worked only for 141 days which does

not qualify for a continuous service of 240 days contemplated by Sec 25-B of ‘the Act’. That apart he has not at

all worked in the year 2007-08 and 2008-09. It is not his case that he was illegally terminated in the intermittent

period. His disengagement during the intermittent period will not fetch him any benefit. However, he has

worked continuously for 282 days and 296 days respectively between 2010 - 2012. Having worked

continuously for 240 days in the respective calendar years, denial of work to the 1^st Party could not be done

otherwise than in accordance with the procedure contemplated by Sec 25-F of ‘the Act’. It is admitted that he is

not given one-month notice / notice pay and retrenchment compensation. His disengagement from service w.e.f

30.10.2012 amounts to illegal retrenchment for not complying with the mandatory provisions of Sec 25-F of

‘the Act’. Though his retrenchment is illegal there cannot be reinstatement to the casual nature of work, hence

he is only entitled for monetary benefit of retrenchment compensation.

AWARD

The petition is allowed.

The 2^nd Party is directed to pay retrenchment compensation as per Sec 25-F(b) of ‘the Act’, to the 1^st Party

workman in lieu of continuous service rendered by him between 2010-11 and 2011-12.

(Dictated to o/s Steno, transcribed by her, corrected and signed by me on 10^th July, 2020)

JUSTICE SMT. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 25 vxLr] 2020

-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj mÙkj jsyos izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k] y[kuÅ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 67@2019½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 25-08-2020 izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-41012@16@2019-vkbZvkj ¼ch-1½]

ch- ,l- fc’V] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 25th August, 2020

S. O. 729.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 67/2019) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Northern

Railway and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 25.08.2020.

[No. L-41012/16/2019-IR(B-1)]

B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.