5327 GI/2020
(2813)
रजिस्ट्री सं. डी.एल. (एन) 04/0007/2003—05
REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05
xxxGIDHxxx
xxxGIDExxx
प्राजिकार से प्रकाजित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप् ताजिक
WEEKLY
सं. 42]
नई दिल् ली, नवम् बर 8—नवम् बर 14, 2020, िजनवार/ कार्तिक 17—कार्तिक 23, 1942
No. 42]
NEW DELHI, NOVEMBER 8— NOVEMBER 14, 2020, SATURDAY/KARTIKA 17—KARTIKA 23, 1942
इस भाग में जभन् न ृष् सं् ा िी िाती िज जिससे दक ि ृष क संकलन के प ृ में र ा िा सके
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग II— ण् ड 3—उृ- ण् ड (ii)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)
भारत सरकार के मंत्राल ों (रक्षा मंत्राल को छोड़कर) द्वारा िारी दकए गए सांजवजिक आिेि और अजिसूचनाएं
Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India
(Other than the Ministry of Defence)
जवत्त मंत्राल
(जवत्ती सेवाएं जवभाग)
नई दिल् ली, 6 अक् तूबर, 2020
का.आ. 993.—भारती स्ट्टेट बैंक अजिजन म, 1955 (1955 का 23) की िारा 20 की उृ-िारा (1) के
सा ृठ त िारा 19 के ण्ड (क) द्वारा प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, केन्री सरकार, एतद्द्वारा, भारती स्ट् टेट
बैंक के प्रबंि जनिेिक, श्री दिनेि कुमार ारा (िन् म जतज : 28.8.1961) को दिनांक 7.10.2020 को अ वा उसके
ृश् चात ृिभार ग्रिण करने की जतज से तीन वर्ि की अवजि के जलए अ वा अगले आिेिों तक, िो भी ृिले िो,
भारती स्ट्टेट बैंक के अध् क्ष के ृि ृर जन ुक् त करती िज।
[फा. सं. 2/1/2020-बीओ-I]
एस. आर. मेिर, उृ सजचव
सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-21112020-223231
CG-DL-W-21112020-223231
2814 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Financial Services)
New Delhi, the 6th October, 2020
S.O. 993.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of section 19 read with sub-section (1) of
section 20 of the State Bank of India Act, 1955 (23 of 1955), the Central Government, hereby appoints
Shri Dinesh Kumar Khara (date of birth: 28.8.1961), Managing Director, State Bank of India as Chairman, State
Bank of India for a period of three years with effect from the date of his taking over charge of the post on or
after 7.10.2020, or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 2/1/2020-BO-I]
S. R. MEHAR, Dy. Secy.
नई दिल् ली, 8 अक् तूबर, 2020
का.आ. 994.—भारती ठरिवि बैंक अजिजन म, 1934 की िारा 8 की उृिारा (4) के सा ृठ त उृ-
िारा (1) के ंड (क) द्वारा प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, केन्री सरकार, एतद्द्वारा, भारती ठरिवि बैंक के
का िृालक जनिेिक, श्री एम. रािेश् वर राव (िन् म जतज 28.4.1961) को ृि का का िभार ग्रिण करने की तारी से
तीन वर्ि की अवजि के जलए अ वा अगले आिेिों तक, िो भी ृिले िो, भारती ठरिवि बैंक के उृ-गवनिर के ृि ृर
जन ुि करती िज।
[फा. सं. 1/1/2011-बीओ-I]
एस. आर. मेिर, उृ सजचव
New Delhi, the 8th October, 2020
S.O. 994.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 8 of the
Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, read with sub-section (4) of section 8 thereof, the Central Government hereby
appoints Shri M. Rajeshwar Rao (date of birth: 28.4.1961), Executive Director, Reserve Bank of India as
Deputy Governor, Reserve Bank of India for a period of three years with effect from the date of assumption of
office, or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 1/1/2011-BO-I]
S. R. MEHAR, Dy. Secy.
नई दिल् ली, 10 अक् तूबर, 2020
का.आ. 995.—रा् री कषत बैंक (प्रबंि और प्रकीणि उृबंि) स्ट् कीम, 1970 के ृजरा 8 के उृ-ृजरा (1) के सा
ृठ त बैंककारी कंृनी (उृक्रमों का अििन और अंतरण) अजिजन म, 1970 की िारा 9 की उृ-िारा (3) के ंड (क)
द्वारा प्रित् त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, केन्री सरकार, एतिद्वारा, दिनांक 8.10.2020 को समाप्त िो रिे
श्री अि कुमार श्रीवास्ट्तव, का िृालक जनिेिक, इजण्ड न ओवरसीि बैंक के का िकाल को िो वर्ि की अवजि के जलए
अ वा अगले आिेिों तक, िो भी ृिले िो, बढाती िज।
[फा. सं. 4/5/2017-बीओ-I]
एस. आर. मेिर, उृ सजचव
New Delhi, the 10th October, 2020
S.O. 995.—In exercise of powers conferred by the proviso to clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 9
of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, read with sub-paragraph (1)
of paragraph 8 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, Central
Government hereby extends the term of office of Shri Ajay Kumar Srivastava, Executive Director, Indian
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2815
Overseas Bank for a period of two years beyond his currently notified terms which expires on 8.10.2020, or
until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 4/5/2017-BO-I]
S. R. MEHAR, Dy. Secy.
नई दिल् ली, 10 अक् तूबर, 2020
का.आ. 996.—रा् री कषत बैंक (प्रबंि और प्रकीणि उृबंि) स्ट् कीम, 1970 के ृजरा 8 के उृ-ृजरा (1) के सा
ृठ त बैंककारी कंृनी (उृक्रमों का अििन और अंतरण) अजिजन म, 1970 की िारा 9 की उृ-िारा (3) के ंड (क)
द्वारा प्रित् त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, केन्री सरकार, एतिद्वारा, दिनांक 18.2.2021 को समाप्त िो रिे
श्री िेबािीर् मु िी, का िृालक जनिेिक, केनरा बैंक के का िकाल को िो वर्ि की अवजि के जलए अ वा अगले
आिेिों तक, िो भी ृिले िो, बढाती िज।
[फा. सं. 4/5/2017-बीओ-I]
एस. आर. मेिर, उृ सजचव
New Delhi, the 10th October, 2020
S.O. 996.—In exercise of powers conferred by the proviso to clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 9
of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, read with sub-paragraph (1)
of paragraph 8 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, Central
Government hereby extends the term of office of Shri Debashish Mukherjee, Executive Director, Canara Bank
for a period of two years beyond his currently notified terms which expires on 18.2.2021, or until further orders,
whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 4/5/2017-BO-I]
S. R. MEHAR, Dy. Secy.
नई दिल् ली, 10 अक् तूबर, 2020
का.आ. 997.—रा् री कषत बैंक (प्रबंि और प्रकीणि उृबंि) स्ट् कीम, 1970 के ृजरा 8 के उृ-ृजरा (1) के सा
ृठ त बैंककारी कंृनी (उृक्रमों का अििन और अंतरण) अजिजन म, 1970 की िारा 9 की उृ-िारा (3) के ंड (क)
द्वारा प्रित् त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, केन्री सरकार, एतिद्वारा, दिनांक 8.10.2020 को समाप्त िो रिे
श्री मातम वेंकट राव, का िृालक जनिेिक, केनरा बैंक के का िकाल को िो वर्ि की अवजि के जलए अ वा अगले
आिेिों तक, िो भी ृिले िो, बढाती िज।
[फा. सं. 4/5/2017-बीओ-I]
एस. आर. मेिर, उृ सजचव
New Delhi, the 10th October, 2020
S.O. 997.—In exercise of powers conferred by the proviso to clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 9
of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, read with sub-paragraph (1)
of paragraph 8 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, Central
Government hereby extends the term of office of Shri Matam Venkata Rao, Executive Director, Canara Bank
for a period of two years beyond his currently notified terms which expires on 8.10.2020, or until further orders,
whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 4/5/2017-BO-I]
S. R. MEHAR, Dy. Secy.
2816 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
नई दिल् ली, 6 नवम् बर, 2020
का.आ. 998.—जनक्षेृ बीमा और प्रत् गारंटी जनगम अजिजन म, 1961 (1961 का 47) की िारा 6 की
उृ-िारा (1) के ंड (ग) द्वारा प्रित् त िजक् त ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, केन् री सरकार, एतद्द्वारा, डॉ. मिनेि कुमार
जमश्र, सं ुि सजचव, जवत्ती सेवाएं जवभाग को तत्काल प्रभाव से और अगले आिेिों तक डॉ. ििांक सक्सेना के
स्ट् ान ृर जनक्षेृ बीमा और प्रत् गारंटी जनगम (डीआईसीिीसी) के जनिेिक मण्डल में जनिेिक नाजमत करती िज।
[फा. सं. 8/3/2017-बीओ-II]
संि कुमार झा, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 6th November, 2020
S.O. 998.— In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the
Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961 (47 of 1961), the Central Government hereby
nominates Dr. Madnesh Kumar Mishra, Joint Secretary, Department of Financial Services as a Director on the
Board of Directors of the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation (DICGC) vice Dr. Shashank
Saksena with immediate effect and until further orders.
[F. No. 8/3/2017-BO-II]
SANJAY KUMAR JHA, Under Secy.
(रािस्ट्व जवभाग)
नई दिल्ली, 9 नवम्बर, 2020
का.आ. 999.—केन्री सरकार, रािभार्ा (संघ के िासकी प्र ोिनों के जलए प्र ोग) जन म, 1976 के जन म 10 के
उृजन म (4) के अनुसरण में रािस्ट्व जवभाग के अिीन अप्रत् क्ष कर एवं सीमािुल्क बोडि, प्रिान आ ुि का ािल सीमािुल्क:
िवाई कागो आ ात, नई दिल्ली जिसके 80 प्रजतित से अजिक कमिचाठर ों ने जिन्िी का का ि सािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जल ा िज, को
अजिसूजचत करती िज।
[फा. सं. ई-11017/3/2017-जिन्िी-2 डीओआर]
डॉ. सतीि चन्र, जनिेिक
(Department of Revenue)
New Delhi, the 9th November, 2020
S.O. 999.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose
of the Union) Rules, 1976, the central government, herby notifies, Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs
Office of The Principal Commissioner Customs: Air Cargo Import, New Delhi, where more than 80% staff have
acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.
[F. No. E-11017/3/2017-Hindi-II DOR]
Dr. SATISH CHANDRA, Director (OL)
नई दिल्ली, 9 नवम्बर, 2020
का.आ. 1000.—केन्री सरकार, रािभार्ा (संघ के िासकी प्र ोिनों के जलए प्र ोग) जन म, 1976 के
जन म 10 के उृजन म (4) के अनुसरण में रािस्ट्व जवभाग के अिीन, केन्री वस्ट्तु एवं सेवाकर आ ुि का का ािल ,
मुंबई ृजिम जिसके 80 प्रजतित से अजिक कमिचाठर ों ने जिन्िी का का ि सािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जल ा िज, को
अजिसूजचत करती िज।
[फा. सं. ई-11017/3/2017-जिन्िी-2 डीओआर]
डॉ. सतीि चन्र, जनिेिक
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2817
New Delhi, the 9th November, 2020
S.O. 1000.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official
Purpose of the Union) Rules, 1976, the central government, herby notifies, Office of The Commissioner of
CGST, Mumbai West, where more than 80% staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.
[F. No. E-11017/3/2017-Hindi-II DOR]
Dr. SATISH CHANDRA, Director (OL)
जविेि मंत्राल
(सी.ृी.वी. प्रभाग)
नई दिल् ली, 23 अक् तूबर 2020
का.आ. 1001.—रािनज क और कोंसुली अजिकारी (िृ एवं फीस) के अजिजन म, 1948 की िारा 2
के ंड (क) के अनुसरण में वजिाजनक आिेि ।
एतद्द्वारा, केंर सरकार भारत के भारत के िूतावास, बग़िाि में श्री बलराम ससंि, सिा क अनुभाग
अजिकारी को दिनांक 21 अक् तूबर 2020 से सिा क कोंसुलर अजिकारी के तौर ृर कोंसुलर सेवाओं के जनविन के
जलए प्राजिकषत करती िज।
[फा. सं. टी-4330/01/2017]
जव्णु कुमार िमाि, जनिेिक (सी.ृी.वी.)
MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
(CPV Division)
New Delhi, the 23rd October, 2020
S.O. 1001.—Statutory Order in pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and
Consular Officers (Oaths and fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri
Balram Singh, Assistant Section Officer as Assistant Consular Officer in Embassy of India, Baghdad to perform
the consular services with effect from 21 October, 2020.
[F. No.T-4330/01/2017]
VISHNU KUMAR SHARMA, Director (CPV)
नई दिल् ली, 26 अक् तूबर 2020
का.आ. 1002.—कानूनी आिेि रािनज क और कोंसुली अजिकारी (िृ और फीस) के अजिजन म,
1948 की िारा 2 के ंड (क) के अनुसरण मे केंर सरकार श्री गौरव वमाि, सिा क अनुभाग अजिकारी को 26
अक्टूबर 2020 से भारत के भारती उच्चा ोग, सूवा में सिा क कोंसुलर अजिकारी के कतिव्यों का ृालन करने के
जलए प्राजिकषत करती िज।
[फा. सं. टी-4330/01/2015]
जव्णु कुमार िमाि, जनिेिक (सी.ृी.वी.)
New Delhi, the 26th October, 2020
S.O. 1002.—Statutory Order in pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and
Consular Officers (Oaths and fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1048), the Central Government hereby authorises Shri
2818 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Gaurav Verma, Assistant Section Officer in High Commission of India, Suva to perform the consular services as
Assistant Consular Officer with effect from 26 October 2020.
[F. No.T-4330/01/2015]
VISHNU KUMAR SHARMA, Director (CPV)
नई दिल् ली, 3 नवम्बर, 2020
का.आ. 1003.— कानूनी आिेि रािनज क और कोंसुली अजिकारी (िृ और फीस) के अजिजन म,
1948 की िारा 2 के ंड (क) के अनुसरण मे केंर सरकार श्री संिीृ कुमार गौतम, सिा क अनुभाग अजिकारी को
03 नवम्बर, 2020 से भारत के भारती उच्चा ोग, लुसाका में सिा क कोंसुलर अजिकारी के कतिव्यों का ृालन
करने के जलए प्राजिकषत करती िज।
[फा. सं. टी-4330/07/2020]
जव्णु कुमार िमाि, जनिेिक (सी.ृी.वी.)
New Delhi, the 3rd November, 2020
S.O. 1003.—Statutory Order in pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and
Consular Officers (Oaths and fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby authorises Shri
Sandeep Kumar Gautam, Assistant Section Officer in High Commission of India, Lusaka to perform the
consular services as Assistant Consular Officer with effect from 03 November, 2020.
[F. No.T-4330/07/2020]
VISHNU KUMAR SHARMA, Director (CPV)
कार्मिक, लोक जिका त और ृेंिन मंत्राल
(कार्मिक और प्रजिक्षण जवभाग)
नई दिल् ली, 10 जसतम्बर, 2020
का.आ. 1004.—केंर सरकार, रािभार्ा [संघ के िासकी प्र ोिनों के जलए प्र ोग] जन मावली, 1976 के
जन म 10 के उृ-जन म (4) के अनुसरण में कार्मिक और प्रजिक्षण जवभाग के अंतगित आने वाले जनम्नजलज त
का ािल को, जिसके 80 प्रजतित से अजिक कमिचाठर ों ने सिंिी भार्ा का का िसािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जल ा िज,
अजिसूजचत करती िजैः-
लाल बिािुर िास्ट् त्री
राष्ट्री प्रिासन अकािमी,
मसूरी, उत्तरा ंड
जृन-248179
[फा. सं. ई-15023/1/2020-सिंिी]
रजश्म चौिरी, अृर सजचव
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2819
MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS
(Department of Personnel and Training)
New Delhi, the 10th September, 2020
S.O. 1004.—Central Government in pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of official languages [Use
for official purpose of union] Rules, 1976 notifies following office of Department of Personnel and Training
whose more than 80 percent staff has acquired working knowledge of Hindi language:-
Lal Bahadur Shastri
National Academy of Administration,
Mussoorie, Uttarakhand
Pin-248179
[F. No. E-15023/1/2020-Hindi]
RASHMI CHOWDHARY, Addl. Secy.
जवद्युत मंत्राल
नई दिल्ली, 9 नवम् बर, 2020
का.आ. 1005.—केंरी सरकार, रािभार्ा (संघ के िासकी प्र ोिनों के जलए प्र ोग) जन म, 1976 के
जन म 10 के उृ जन म (4) के अनुसरण में जवद्युत मंत्राल के प्रिासजनक जन ंत्रणािीन एनएचृीसी जलजमटेड के
अंतगित जनम्मो बािगो ृावर स्ट्टेिन, अल्ची, लेि, लद्दा संघ िाजसत प्रिेि-194107, जिनके 80 प्रजतित
कमिचारीवषंि ने सिंिी का का िसािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जल ा िज, को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजचत करती िज।
[फा. सं. 11011/9/2017-सिंिी]
राि ृाल, वठरष्ठ सलािकार
MINISTRY OF POWER
New Delhi, the 9th November, 2020
S.O. 1005—In pursuance of Sub Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official
Purpose of the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notify Nimoo Bazgo Power Station, Alchi,
Leh, UT of Ladakh-194107 of the NHPC Limited under the administrative control of Ministry of Power, where
80% of the staff have acquired working knowledge of Hindi.
[F. No.11011/9/2017-Hindi]
RAJ PAL, Senior Adviser
वाजणज् एवं उद्योग मंत्राल
(वाजणज् जवभाग)
नई दिल्ली, 10 नवम् बर, 2020
का.आ. 1006.—केन्री सरकार, जन ाित (गुणवत्ता जन ंत्रण एंव जनरीक्षण) अजिजन म, 1963 (1963 का
22) की िारा 7 की उृिारा (1) के सा ृठ त जन ाित (गुणवत्ता जन ंत्रण एंव जनरीक्षण) जन म, 1964 के जन म
12, के उृजन म (2) द्वारा प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, मजससि जमनरल्स लजब सर्विसेि प्राइवेट जलजमटेड,
डी. न. 1-30-18, ‘श्री िुगिम्बा जनवास’, ग्राउंड फ्लोर, 4th मेल, बंगरा कुलूर, आनंि गजराि के ृास, कोटारा चौकी,
मंगलुरु, कनािटक- 575013 जिसे एतद्ृिात उि अजभकरण माना िाएगा) को इस अजिसूचना के िासकी रािृत्र
में प्रकािन की तारी से तीन वर्ि की अवजि के जलए, वाजणज् मंत्राल की िासकी रािृत्र में प्रकाजित भारत
2820 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
सरकार की अजिसूचना के सा अनुसूची में जनर्िि् ट दिनांक 20 दिसम्बर, 1965 की अजिसूचना की सं् ा का.आ.
3975 के तित प्रकाजित अजिसूचना में उृाबद्ध अनुसूची में जवजनर्ििष्ट जनि और अ स्ट्क समूि-। अ ाित लौि
अ स्ट्क के जन ाित से ृूवि जनम्नजलज त ितों के अिीन मंगलौर ृत्तन में उक् त जनि एवं अ स्ट् क के जनरीक्षण करने के
जलए एक अजभकरण के प ृ में मान् ता िेती िज, अ ाित् :
(i)
ि अजभकरण, जनि और अ स्ट्क समूि-। के जन ाित (जनरीक्षण) जन म, 1965 जन म 4 के अिीन
जनरीक्षण की ृद्धजत की िााँच करने के जल े जन ाित जनरीक्षण ृठरर्ि् द्वारा जनजमत्त नामजनर्ििष्ट
अजिकाठर ों को ृ ािप्त सुजविाएं िेगी; और
(ii) ि अजभकरण, इस अजिसूचना में ा जवजनर्िि् ट अृने का ो का जन् ृािन करने के जलए, जनिेिक
(जनरीक्षण और गुणवत्ता जन ंत्रण) जन ाित जनरीक्षण ृठरर्ि द्वारा सम -सम ृर, जलज त प ृ में,
दिए गए जनिेिों से आबद्ध िोंगी ।
[फा. सं. के-16014/12/2020-जन ाित जनरीक्षण]
दिवाकर ना जमश्रा, सं ुि सजचव
MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY
(Department of Commerce)
New Delhi, the 10th November, 2020
S.O. 1006.—In exercise of the powers conferred by the sub-section (1) of section 7 of the Export
(Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 (22 of 1963) read with sub-rule (2) of rule 12 of the Export (Quality
Control and Inspection) Rules, 1964, the Central Government hereby recognises M/s. Minerals Lab Services
Private Limited, D.No. 1-30-18, ‘Shri Durgamba Nivas’, Ground Floor, 4th Mail, Bangra Kulur, Near Anand
Garage, Kottara Chowki, Mangaluru, Karnataka-575013, (hereinafter referred to as the said agency), as an
agency for a period of three years from the date of publication of this notification, for the inspection of Minerals
and Ores- Group-I, namely, Iron Ore specified in the Schedule annexed to the notification of the Government of
India in the Ministry of Commerce published in the official Gazette vide number S.O. 3975, dated the 20th
December, 1965, prior to export of the said Mineral and Ore at Mangalore Port, subject to the following
conditions, namely:-
(i)
the said agency shall give adequate facilities to the officers nominated by the Export Inspection
Council in this behalf to examine the method of inspection followed by them in carrying out the
inspection specified under rule 4 of the Export of Minerals and Ores - Group I (Inspection) Rules,
1965; and
(ii)
the said agency in performance of its function as specified in this notification shall be bound by
such directions as the Director (Inspection and Quality Control), Export Inspection Council may
give, in writing, from time to time.
[F. No. K-16014/12/2020-Export Inspection]
DIWAKAR NATH MISRA, Jt. Secy.
को ला मंत्राल
नई दिल्ली, 12 नवम्बर, 2020
का.आ. 1007.—केन्री सरकार ने को ला िारक क्षेत्र (अििन और जवकास) अजिजन म,1957 (1957 का
20)(जिसे इसके ृिात उि अजिजन म किा ग ा िज) की िारा 7 की उृ-िारा (1) के अिीन िारी भारत के
रािृत्र, भाग II, ंड 3, उृ ंड (ii), तारी 2 मई, 2020 में प्रकाजित भारत सरकार के को ला मंत्राल की
अजिसूचना सं् ांक का.आ. 399, तारी 30 अप्रजल, 2020 द्वारा प्रकाजित उस अजिसूचना में संलग्न अनुसूची में
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2821
जवजनर्ििष्ट 428.64 िेक्टे र (लगभग) अ वा 1059.19 एकड़ (लगभग) ृठरक्षेत्र की भूजम में ा उस ृर के सभी
अजिकार का अििन के अृने आि की सूचना िी ी;
और सक्षम प्राजिकारी ने उि अजिजन म की िारा 8 के अनुसरण में केन्री सरकार को अृनी ठरृोटि िे िी
िज;
और केन्री सरकार का, उृ ुि
ठरृोटि ृर जवचार करने के ृिात और झार ंड सरकार से ृरामिि करने
के ृिात् ि समािान िो ग ा िज दक इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित 428.64 िेक्टे र (लगभग) अ वा 1059.19
एकड़ (लगभग), माृ वाली भूजम और ऐसी भूजम में और उस ृर के सभी अर्िित दकए िाने चाजिए ;
अतैः, अब, केन्री सरकार, उि अजिजन म की िारा 9 की उृ-िारा (1) द्वारा प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग
करते हुए घोर्णा करती िज दक इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में जवजनर्ििष्ट 428.64 िेक्टे र (लगभग) अ वा 1059.19 एकड़
(लगभग), माृ वाली भूजम और ऐसी भूजम में और उस ृर के सभी अजिकार अर्िित दकए िाते िैं।
इस अजिसूचना के अिीन आने वाले क्षेत्र के रे ांक सं् ांक आरईवी/04/2020, तारी 22 जसतंबर,
2020 का जनरीक्षण उृा ुि, जिला रामगढ और बोकारो (झार ंड) के का ािल में अ वा को ला जन ंत्रक, 1,
काउंजसल िाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता 700001 के का ािल में अ वा मिाप्रबंिक, सेंरल कोलफील््स जलजमटेड, कोतरे
बसंतृुर ृचमो क्षेत्र, जिला रामगढ और बोकारो (झार ंड) अ वा मिाप्रबंिक, भूजम और रािस्ट्व, सेंरल
कोलफील््स जलजमटेड, िरभंगा िाउस, रााँची- 834001, झार ंड अ वा मु् मिाप्रबंिक ( ोि प्रभाग), सेंरल
माइन प्लासनंग एण्ड जडिाइन इन्स्ट्टीच् ूट जलजमटेड, गोंडवाना ृजलेस, कांके रोड, रााँची- 834008, झार ंड के
का ािल में दक ा िा सकता िज।
अनुसूची
कोतरे बसंतृुर ृचमो ओसीृी
जिला रामगढ और बोकारो (झार ण्ड)
[ रे ांक सं् ांक आरईवी/04/2020, तारी 22 जसतंबर, 2020 ]
सभी अजिकार:
क्र.सं.
ग्राम
ाना
सं् ा
ाना
जिला
क्षेत्र
ठटप्ृजण ां
िेक्टे र में
एकड़ में
1.
बसंतृुर
105
मांडू
रामगढ
107.24
265.00
भाग
2.
कोतरे
106
मांडू
रामगढ
253.33
626.00
भाग
3.
हुरिाग
28
गोजम ा
बोकारो
15.38
38.00
भाग
4.
ृचमो
27
गोजम ा
बोकारो
32.26
79.71
भाग
5.
ृुरनाृानी
25
गोजम ा
बोकारो
20.43
50.48
भाग
कुल :
428.64 िेक्टे र
(लगभग)
1059.19
एकड़
(लगभग)
1. ग्राम बसंतृुर में अर्िित दकए गए प्लाट सं् ांक: 78 (भाग) और 85 (भाग)।
2. ग्राम कोतरे में अर्िित दकए गए प्लाट सं् ांक : 1, 2, 3, 4( भाग), 5 से 16, 17 (भाग), 21 (भाग), 22 (भाग),
23 (भाग), 24, 25 (भाग), 27, 28 (भाग), 31, 32, 33 (भाग), 34 ( भाग), 37( भाग), 38 ( भाग) और
17/52।
2822 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3. ग्राम हुरिाग में अर्िित दकए गए प्लाट सं् ांक : 1( भाग) और 2 ( भाग)।
4. ग्राम ृचमो में अर्िित दकए गए प्लाट सं् ांक : 7 ( भाग), 8 (भाग), 9 ( भाग), 333 (भाग) और 352 (भाग)।
5. ग्राम ृुरनाृानी में अर्िित दकए िाने वाले प्लाट सं् ांक : 108 ( भाग), 109 (भाग) और 112 ( भाग)।
भू-अजभले के अनुसार अर्िित की गई भूजम का जववरण नीचे सारणी में दि ा ग ा िज:-
जिला : रामगढ (झार ंड) :
ग्राम
ाना
सं् ा
ाता
सं् ा
प्लॉट
सं् ा
अर्िित की
िाने वाली
भूजम का क्षेत्र
(एकड़ में)
भूजम का प्रकार
अजभले में
भूस्ट्वामी का
नाम
जृता / ृजत
का अजभले
में भूस्ट् वामी
नाम
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
बसंतृुर
105
71
78(भाग)
247.61
अजिसूजचत वन
और सरकारी
भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
सरकारी भूजम
बसंतृुर
105
71
85(भाग)
17.39
अजिसूजचत वन
और सरकारी
भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
सरकारी भूजम
कुल :
2 प्लॉट का
सं् ांक
265.00 एकड़
कोतरे
106
1
1
100.00
अजिसूजचत वन
सरकारी
भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
कोतरे
106
1
2
88.62
अजिसूजचत वन
और सरकारी
भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
कोतरे
106
1
3
90.22
अजिसूजचत वन
सरकारी
भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
कोतरे
106
1
4(भाग)
81.01
अजिसूजचत वन
सरकारी
भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
कोतरे
106
1
5
95.25
अजिसूजचत वन
और सरकारी
भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
कोतरे
106
2
6
0.35
रज ती
ाकुर मितो
इत् ादि
टौली मितो
कोतरे
106
2
7
0.85
रज ती
ाकुर मितो
इत् ादि
टौली मितो
कोतरे
106
2
8
0.04
रज ती
ाकुर मितो
इत् ादि
टौली मितो
कोतरे
106
2
9
0.06
रज ती
ाकुर मितो
इत् ादि
टौली मितो
कोतरे
106
2
10
1.50
रज ती
ाकुर मितो
इत् ादि
टौली मितो
कोतरे
106
2
11
0.34
रज ती
ाकुर मितो
इत् ादि
टौली मितो
कोतरे
106
2
12
1.06
रज ती
ाकुर मितो
इत् ादि
टौली मितो
कोतरे
106
2
13
0.11
रज ती
ाकुर मितो
इत् ादि
टौली मितो
कोतरे
106
2
14
0.31
रज ती
ाकुर मितो
टौली मितो
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2823
इत् ादि
कोतरे
106
2
15
0.70
रज ती
ाकुर मितो
इत् ादि
टौली मितो
कोतरे
106
2
16
0.31
रज ती
ाकुर मितो
इत् ादि
टौली मितो
कोतरे
106
2
17(भाग)
2.15
रज ती
ाकुर मितो
इत् ादि
टौली मितो
कोतरे
106
1
21(भाग)
4.94
सरकारी भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
कोतरे
106
2
22(भाग)
0.30
रज ती
ाकुर मितो
टौली मितो
कोतरे
106
2
23(भाग)
1.81
रज ती
ाकुर मितो
इत् ादि
टौली मितो
कोतरे
106
1
24
0.01
गजर मिरुवा ास
सरकारी
भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
कोतरे
106
5
25(भाग)
0.53
रज ती
सु लाल
मितो
इत् ादि
बोिराम
मितो
कोतरे
106
2
27
0.32
रज ती
ाकुर मितो
इत् ादि
टौली मितो
कोतरे
106
4
28(भाग)
0.41
रज ती
लेिवा कुमार
मएआ
रामकुमार
कोतरे
106
1
31
48.00
अजिसूजचत वन
और सरकारी
भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
कोतरे
106
5
32
0.91
रज ती
सु लाल
मितो
इत् ादि
बोिराम
मितो
कोतरे
106
2
33(भाग)
0.54
रज ती
ाकुर मितो
इत् ादि
टौली मितो
कोतरे
106
1
34(भाग)
37.22
अजिसूजचत वन
सरकारी
भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
कोतरे
106
1
37(भाग)
59.02
अजिसूजचत वन
और सरकारी
भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
कोतरे
106
1
38(भाग)
8.54
अजिसूजचत वन
और सरकारी
भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
कोतरे
106
2
17/52
0.57
रज ती
ाकुर मितो
इत् ादि
टौली मितो
कुल:
31 प्लॉट का
सं् ांक
626.00 एकड़
जिला : बोकारो (झार ंड) :
ग्राम
ाना
सं् ा
ाता
सं् ा
प्लॉट सं् ा
अर्िित की
िाने वाली
भूजम का क्षेत्र
(एकड़ में)
भूजम का प्रकार
अजभले में
भूस्ट्वामी का
नाम
जृता / ृजत
का अजभले
में
भूस्ट् वामी
नाम
हुरिाग
28
1
1(भाग)
6.85
अजिसूजचत वन
सरकारी भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
हुरिाग
28
1
2(भाग)
31.15
अजिसूजचत वन
सरकारी भूजम
सरकारी
2824 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
और सरकारी
भूजम
भूजम
कुल
2 प्लॉट का
सं् ांक
38.00
एकड़
ृचमो
27
2
7(भाग)
28.08
अजिसूजचत वन
और सरकारी
भूजम
सरकारी भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
ृचमो
27
2
8(भाग)
12.67
अजिसूजचत वन
और सरकारी
भूजम
सरकारी भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
ृचमो
27
2
9(भाग)
17.68
अजिसूजचत वन
और सरकारी
भूजम
सरकारी भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
ृचमो
27
2
333(भाग)
9.53
अजिसूजचत वन
और सरकारी
भूजम
सरकारी भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
ृचमो
27
2
352(भाग)
11.75
अजिसूजचत वन
और सरकारी
भूजम
सरकारी भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
कुल
5 प्लॉट का
सं् ांक
79.71
एकड़
ृुरनाृानी
25
1
108(भाग)
20.00
अजिसूजचत वन
सरकारी भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
ृुरनाृानी
25
1
109(भाग)
18.13
अजिसूजचत वन
सरकारी भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
ृुरनाृानी
25
1
112(भाग)
12.35
अजिसूजचत वन
सरकारी भूजम
सरकारी
भूजम
कुल
3 प्लॉट का
सं् ांक
50.48
एकड़
सीमा वणिन :
ए-बी-सी-डी-ई-एफ-िी-एच-
आइ-िे-के-एल-एम-एन-ओ-ृी-
क् ू-आर-ए
-
रे ा जबन्िु ‘ए’ से आरंभ िोकर ग्राम बसंतृुर के प्लॉट सं् ा 85 और 78 ग्राम कोतरे
के प्लॉट सं् ा 1, ग्राम ृुरनाृानी के प्लॉट सं् ा 108, 109 और 112, ग्राम कोतरे
के प्लॉट सं् ा 3,4 और 37, ग्राम हुरिाग के प्लॉट सं् ा 1 और 2, ग्राम ृचमो के
प्लॉट सं् ा 7,8, 352 और 333, ग्राम हुरिाग के प्लॉट सं् ा 2, ग्राम कोतरे के
प्लॉट सं् ा 38, 37, 34, 31, 33, 28, 27, 25, 23, 22, 17, 52, 21, 10, 7
और 6, ग्राम बसंतृुर के प्लॉट सं् ा 78 और 85 से गुिरते हुए आरंजभक जबन्िु ‘ए’
ृर जमलती िज ।
ए-बी-सी-डी-ई-एफ-िी-एच-
आइ-िे-के
-
रे ा जबन्िु ‘ए’ से आरंभ िोकर ग्राम बसंतृुर के प्लॉट सं् ा 85 और 78, ग्राम
कोतरे के प्लॉट सं् ा 1, ग्राम ृुरनाृानी के प्लॉट सं् ा 108,109 और 112, ग्राम
कोतरे के प्लॉट सं् ा 3,4 और 37, ग्राम हुरिाग के प्लॉट सं् ा 1 और 2, ग्राम
ृचमो के प्लॉट सं् ा 7, 8, 352 और 333 से गुिरते हुए जबन्िु ‘के’ ृर जमलती िज,
िोदक कोतरे बसंतृुर ृचमो ओसीृी के ृठर ोिना ठरृोटि के अनुसार न ी
अजिग्रिण सीमा िज ।
के-एल-एम-एन-ओ-ृी-क् ू
-
रे ा जबन्िु ‘के’ से आरंभ िोकर ग्राम ृचमो के 333, 352, 9 और 7, ग्राम हुरिाग
के प्लॉट सं् ा 2, ग्राम कोतरे के प्लॉट सं् ा 38, 37, 34, 31, 33, 28, 27, 25,
23, 22, 17, 52 और 21 से गुिरते हुए, ृचमो, हुरिाग और कोतरे ग्रामों के भाग
{को ला िारक क्षेत्र (अििन और जवकास ) अजिजन म, 1957 की िारा 9(1) के
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2825
अिीन का. आ. 2082, तारी 30 िून, 1981 के माध् म से अजिग्रजित हुरिाग
ब्लॉक की अजिग्रिण सीमा} की जबन्िु ‘क् ू’ ृर जमलती िज ।
क् ू-आर-ए
-
रे ा जबन्िु ‘क् ू’ से आरंभ िोकर ग्राम कोतरे के प्लॉट सं् ा 21, 10, 7 और 6,
ग्राम बसंतृुर के प्लॉट सं् ा 78 और 85 से गुिरते हुए, कोतरे और बसंतृुर ग्रामों
के भाग {को ला िारक क्षेत्र अजिजन म की िारा 9(1) के अिीन का. आ. 981(अ),
तारी 22 दिसंबर, 1980 के माध् म से अजिग्रजित बसंतृुर ब्लॉक की अजिग्रिण
सीमा} आरंजभक जबन्िु ‘ए’ ृर जमलती िज ।
[फा. सं. 43015/15/2018-एलए एण्ड आईआर]
मुकेि, अवर सजचव
MINISTRY OF COAL
New Delhi, the 12th November, 2020
S.O. 1007.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number
S.O. 399, dated the 30th April, 2020, issued under sub-section (1) of section 7 of the Coal Bearing Areas
(Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and published in
the Gazette of India, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), dated the 2nd May, 2020, the Central Government gave
notice of its intention to acquire the the land measuring 428.64 hectares (approximately) or 1059.19 acres
(approximately) and all rights in and over such land in the locality specified in the Schedule appended to that
notification;
And whereas, the competent authority in pursuance of section 8 of the said Act has made his report to
the Central Government;
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the report aforesaid and after consulting the
Government of Jharkhand is satisfied that the all rights in and over land measuring 428.64 hectares
(approximately) or 1059.19 acres (approximately), described in the Schedule appended hereto should be
acquired;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 9 of the said Act, the
Central Government hereby declares that all rights in and over land measuring 428.64 hectares (approximately)
or 1059.19 acres (approximately), described in the Schedule annexed hereto are hereby acquired.
The plan bearing number REV/04/2020, dated the 22nd September, 2020 of the area covered by this
notification may be inspected in the office of the Deputy Commissioner, District – Ramgarh and Bokaro
(Jharkhand) or at the office of Coal Controller, 1, Council House street, Kolkata -700001 or in the office of the
General Manager, Central Coalfields Limited, Kotre Basantpur Pachmo Area, District Ramgarh and Bokaro
(Jharkhand) or General Manager, Land and Revenue, Central Coalfields Limited, Darbhanga House, Ranchi-
834001, Jharkhand or Chief General Manager (Exploration Division), Central Mine Planning and Design
Institute Limited, Gondwana Place, Kanke Road, Ranchi - 834008, Jharkhand.
SCHEDULE
KOTRE BASANTPUR PACHMO OCP
DISTRICT- RAMGARH AND BOKARO (JHARKHAND)
[ Plan bearing number Rev/04/2020, dated the 22nd September, 2020 ]
ALL RIGHTS :
Sl.
No.
Village
Thana
number
Thana
District
Area
Remarks
In hectares
In acres
1.
Basantpur
105
Mandu
Ramgarh
107.24
265.00
Part
2.
Kotre
106
Mandu
Ramgarh
253.33
626.00
Part
3.
Hurdag
28
Gomia
Bokaro
15.38
38.00
Part
4.
Pachmo
27
Gomia
Bokaro
32.26
79.71
Part
5.
Purnapani
25
Gomia
Bokaro
20.43
50.48
Part
Total:
428.64
hectares
(approxi-
mately)
1059.19 acres
(approx-
mately)
2826 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1. Plot numbers acquired in village Basantpur : 78 (P) and 85 (P).
2. Plot numbers acquired in village Kotre : 1, 2, 3, 4 (P), 5 to 16, 17 (P), 21 (P), 22 (P), 23 (P), 24, 25 (P), 27, 28
(P), 31, 32, 33 (P), 34 (P), 37 (P), 38 (P) and 17/52.
3. Plot numbers acquired in village Hurdag: 1(P) and 2(P).
4. Plot numbers acquired in village Pachmo: 7(P), 8(P), 9(P), 333(P) and 352(P).
5. Plot numbers acquired in village Purnapani: 108(P), 109(P) and 112(P).
Details of land acquired with land records is given in the table below:-
District: Ramgarh (Jharkhand):
Village
Thana
number
Khata
number
Plot
number
Intention
to acquire
the
area
(in acres)
Class of land
Name
of
recorded Tenant
Father's /
Husband's
name of
recorded
Tenant
Basantpur
105
71
78(P)
247.61
Notified
Forest
and
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Basantpur
105
71
85(P)
17.39
Notified
Forest
and
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Total
2 numbers of plots
265.00
acres
Kotre
106
1
1
100.00
Notified
Forest
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Kotre
106
1
2
88.62
Notified
Forest and
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Kotre
106
1
3
90.22
Notified
Forest
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Kotre
106
1
4(P)
81.01
Notified
Forest
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Kotre
106
1
5
95.25
Notified
Forest and
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Kotre
106
2
6
0.35
Tenancy
Thakur
Mahto
etc.
Touli
Mahto
Kotre
106
2
7
0.85
Tenancy
Thakur
Mahto
etc.
Touli
Mahto
Kotre
106
2
8
0.04
Tenancy
Thakur
Mahto
etc.
Touli
Mahto
Kotre
106
2
9
0.06
Tenancy
Thakur
Mahto
etc.
Touli
Mahto
Kotre
106
2
10
1.50
Tenancy
Thakur
Mahto
etc.
Touli
Mahto
Kotre
106
2
11
0.34
Tenancy
Thakur
Mahto
etc.
Touli
Mahto
Kotre
106
2
12
1.06
Tenancy
Thakur
Mahto
etc.
Touli
Mahto
Kotre
106
2
13
0.11
Tenancy
Thakur
Mahto
etc.
Touli
Mahto
Kotre
106
2
14
0.31
Tenancy
Thakur
Mahto
etc.
Touli
Mahto
Kotre
106
2
15
0.70
Tenancy
Thakur
Mahto
etc.
Touli
Mahto
Kotre
106
2
16
0.31
Tenancy
Thakur
Mahto
etc.
Touli
Mahto
Kotre
106
2
17(P)
2.15
Tenancy
Thakur
Mahto
etc.
Touli
Mahto
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2827
Kotre
106
1
21(P)
4.94
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Kotre
106
2
22(P)
0.30
Tenancy
Thakur
Mahto
etc.
Touli
Mahto
Kotre
106
2
23(P)
1.81
Tenancy
Thakur
Mahto
etc.
Touli
Mahto
Kotre
106
1
24
0.01
GMK
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Kotre
106
5
25(P)
0.53
Tenancy
Sukhlal Mahto
etc.
Bodhram
Mahto
Kotre
106
2
27
0.32
Tenancy
Thakur
Mahto
etc.
Touli
Mahto
Kotre
106
4
28(P)
0.41
Tenancy
Ledwa Kumar
Maea
Ram kumar
Kotre
106
1
31
48.00
Notified
Forest and
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Kotre
106
5
32
0.91
Tenancy
Sukhlal Mahto
etc.
Bodhram
Mahto
Kotre
106
2
33(P)
0.54
Tenancy
Thakur
Mahto
etc.
Touli
Mahto
Kotre
106
1
34(P)
37.22
Notified
Forest
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Kotre
106
1
37(P)
59.02
Notified
Forest and
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Kotre
106
1
38(P)
8.54
Notified
Forest and
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Kotre
106
2
17/52
0.57
Tenancy
Thakur
Mahto
etc.
Touli
Mahto
Total
31 numbers of
plots
626.00
acres
District: Bokaro (Jharkhand):
Village
Thana
number
Khata
number
Plot
number
Intention
to acquire
the area
(in acres)
Class of land
Name of
recorded Tenant
Father's /
Husband's
name of
recorded
Tenant
Hurdag
28
1
1(P)
6.85
Notified
Forest
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Hurdag
28
1
2(P)
31.15
Notified
Forest
and
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Total
2 numbers of plots
38.00
acres
Pachmo
27
2
7(P)
28.08
Notified
Forest
and
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Pachmo
27
2
8(P)
12.67
Notified
Forest
and
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Pachmo
27
2
9(P)
17.68
Notified
Forest
and
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Pachmo
27
2
333(P)
9.53
Notified
Forest
and
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Pachmo
27
2
352(P)
11.75
Notified
Forest
and
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
2828 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Total
5 numbers of plots
79.71
acres
Purnapani
25
1
108(P)
20.00
Notified
Forest
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Purnapani
25
1
109(P)
18.13
Notified
Forest
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Purnapani
25
1
112(P)
12.35
Notified
Forest
Govt. Land
Govt. Land
Total
3 numbers of plots
50.48
acres
Boundary Description:
A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H-I-J-K- L-M-
N-O-P-Q-R-A
Line starts from point ‘A’ and passes through plot no. 85 and 78 of village
Basantpur, plot No. 1 of village Kotre, plot no. 108, 109 and 112 of village
Purnapani, plot No. 3, 4 and 37 of village Kotre, plot no. 1 and 2 of village
Hurdag, plot No. 7, 8, 352 and 333 of village Pachmo, plot no. 2 of village
Hurdag, plot No. 38, 37, 34, 31, 33, 28, 27, 25, 23, 22, 17, 52, 21, 10, 7 and
6 of village Kotre, plot no. 78 and 85 of village Basantpur and meets at
starting point ‘A’.
A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H- I-J-K
Line starts from point ‘A’ and passes through plot no. 85 and 78 of village
Basantpur, plot no. 1 of village Kotre, plot no. 108, 109 and 112 of village
Purnapani, plot no. 3, 4 and 37 of village Kotre, plot no. 1 and 2 of village
Hurdag, plot no. 7, 8, 352 and 333 of village Pachmo and meets at point ‘K’,
which is new acquisition boundary as per Project Report of Kotre Basantpur
Pachmo OCP.
K-L-M-N-O-P-Q
Line starts from point ‘K’ and passes through plot no. 333, 352, 9 and 7 of
village Pachmo, plot no. 2 of village Hurdag, plot no. 38, 37, 34, 31, 33, 28,
27, 25, 23, 22, 17, 52 and 21 of village Kotre and meets at point ‘Q’, (part
village of Pachmo, Hurdag and Kotre) [Acquisition boundary line of Hurdag
Block under section 9(1) of Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and
Development) Act, 1957, number S.O. 2082, dated 30th June, 1981].
Q-R-A
Line starts from point ‘Q’ and passes through plot no. 21, 10, 7 and 6 of
village Kotre, plot no. 78 and 85 of village Basantpur and meets at starting
point ‘A’, part village of Kotre and Basantpur (Acquisition Boundary Line
of Basantpur Block under section 9(1) of Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition
and Development) Act, 1957 number S.O. 981(E), dated 22nd December,
1980.)
[F. No. 43015/15/2018-LA&IR]
MUKESH , Under Secy.
सूक्ष्म, लघु और मध् म उद्यम मंत्राल
(एसएमई अनुभाग)
नई दिल् ली, 6 नवम्बर, 2020
का.आ. 1008.—केन् री सरकार, सरकारी स्ट् ान (अप्राजिकषत अजिभोजग ों की बेि ली) अजिजन म
1971 (1971 का 40) की िारा 3 द्वारा प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए और भारत के रािृत्र, भाग 2, ण् ड 3,
उृ- ण् ड (ii), तारी 14 मई, 2016 में प्रकाजित भारत सरकार, सूक्ष्म, लघु और मध् म उद्यम मंत्राल की
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2829
अजिसूचना सं् ा का.आ. 865, तारी 12 मई, 2016 को उन बातों के जसवा अजिक्रांत करते हुए जिन् िें ऐसे
अजिक्रमण से ृूवि दक ा ग ा िज अ वा दकए िाने का लोृ दक ा ग ा िज, जनम्नजलज त ताजलका के स्ट् तंभ (1) में
उजल्लज त अजिकारी को केन्री सरकार के रािृजत्रत अजिकारी के रैंक के समतुल् अजिकारी िोने के नाते उि
अजिजन म के प्र ोिन िेतु सम्ृिा अजिकारी के प ृ में जन ुि करती िज त ा आगे जनिेि िेती िज दक उि अजिकारी
उि ताजलका के स्ट् तंभ (2) में जवजनर्ििष्ट सरकारी स्ट् ानों के संबंि में अृनी अजिकाठरता की सीमा के भीतर उि
अजिजन म द्वारा अ वा उसके अिीन प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करेगा और सम्ृिा अजिकारी को सौंृे गए कतिव्यों का
जनविन करेगा।
ताजलका
अजिकारी का ृिनाम
सरकारी स्ट् ानों की श्रेजण ां त ा अजिकाठरता की स्ट् ानी
सीमा
(1)
(2)
श्री नवीन चोृड़ा, मु् मिाप्रबंिक च न ग्रेड, राष्ट्री लघु
उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड, नई दिल्ली
राष्ट्री राििानी क्षेत्र दिल्ली में राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम
जलजमटेड द्वारा सम -सम ृर स्ट्वाजमत्व अ वा ृ्े ृर जलए
गए स्ट् ान त ा अन् स्ट् ानों ृर ििां इसके आंचजलक
का ािल , िा ा और उृ-िा ा का ािल , तकनीकी सेवा
केन्र जस्ट् त िैं, िजसा दक उृाबंि में उजल्लज त िज ।
उृाबंि
क्र. सं.
का ािल
ृता
(1)
(2)
(3)
1
काृोरेट का ािल
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड
(भारत सरकार का उृक्रम)
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम भवन, ओ ला औद्योजगक एस्ट्टेट,
नई दिल्ली - 110 020
िूरभार्: 011-26926275, 26926370,
टोल फ्री नंबर 1800111955
फजक्स: 011-26932075, 26311109
ईमेल: [email protected],
वेबसाइट: www.nsic.co.in
2
आंचजलक का ािल (रा् री राििानी
क्षेत्र)
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
आंचजलक का ािल (रा् री राििानी क्षेत्र),
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम तकनीकी सेवा केंर ृठरसर
ओ ला इंडजस्ट्र ल एस्ट्टेट, नई दिल्ली -110020
िूरभार्: 011-26382350, 011-40584930
ईमेल: [email protected]
3
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम तकनीकी सेवा केंर ृठरसर
ओ ला इंडजस्ट्र ल एस्ट्टेट, नई दिल्ली -110020
िूरभार्: 011-26382568 / 69
ईमेल: [email protected]
4
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
2830 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
सीबी-326, िूसरी मंजिल, ररंग रोड,
नारा णा, नई दिल्ली - 110028
िूरभार्: 011-64611484, 25775787
ईमेल: [email protected]
5
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
िेड -99, प्र म तल, मामा चौक, एम.आई.ई. ृाटि-ए,
दिल्ली रोितक रोड,
बिािुरगढ - 124 507 (िठर ाणा)
िूरभार्: 01276-267551,
ईमेल: [email protected]
6
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
प्लॉट नंबर 69, आईडीसी, सेक्टर -16,
एमिी रोड, गुरुग्राम,
िठर ाणा - 122001
िूरभार्: 0124-2308913,
फजक्स: 0124-2220543
ईमेल: [email protected]
7
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
प्लॉट नंबर 107, जनसान िट, एनएच -5, रेलवे रोड
फरीिाबाि - 121 001 (िठर ाणा)
िूरभार्: 0129-4311249 / 52/92/93
फजक्स: 0129-4311293
ईमेल: [email protected],
ईमेल: [email protected]
8
आंचजलक का ािल (उत्तर- I)
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
आंचजलक का ािल उत्तर- I,
सी-41, सेक्टर - 58, नोएडा (उ.प्र.) - 201301
िूरभार्: 0120-4546198, 4546197
ईमेल: [email protected]
9
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
III-B / 118-B, सेक्टर -18, िॉसृंग कॉम्प्लेक्स
नोएडा - 201 301 (उ.प्र.)
िूरभार्: 0120-4595000-45, 0120-251179
ईमेल: [email protected]
10
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
सब्िी मंडी के ृास, जनरंिनृुर,
सिारनृुर रोड, िेिरािून -248001
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2831
िूरभार्: 0135-2520501
ईमेल: [email protected]
11
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
उृ िा ा / प्रजिक्षण-सि-इंक् ुबेिन केंर
बी -1, बी -5, औद्योजगक एस्ट्टेट, बािृुर रोड,
कािीृुर, उत्तरांचल
िूरभार्: 0135-2520501
ईमेल: [email protected]
12
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल , टी -6, 307, 118/8,
तीसरी मंजिल, मारुजत प्लािा, संि प्लेस,
(संि टॉकीि के सामने)
आगरा - 282 002
िूरभार्: 0562-2527862 / 2525567/2524842
ईमेल: [email protected]
13
राष्ट्री अनुसूजचत िाजत/अनुसूजचत िनिाजत िब का ािल ,
ृिम जबिनेस ृाकि, ूजनट नंबर 202,
िूसरी मंजिल, प्लॉट नंबर आईएनएस-1,
सेक्टर -13 ए, अवास जवकास, जसकंिरा ोिना,
आगरा -282007 (उत्तर प्रिेि)
ईमेल: [email protected]
14
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल / राष्ट्री अनुसूजचत िाजत और अनुसूजचत िनिाजत िब
का ािल
503, 5 वीं मंजिल, श्री राम टॉवर,
13, अिोक मागि, ल नऊ -226001
िूरभार्: 0522-2288803
ईमेल: [email protected],
15
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
112/1, बेनझाबर रोड, (िूसरी मंजिल),
कानृुर - 208 002 (उत्तर प्रिेि)
िूरभार्: 0512-2535049
ईमेल: [email protected]
16
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
उृ िा ा
डीआईसी कजम्ृस, गोर ना इंडजस्ट्र ल इस्ट्टेट,
गोर ृुर – 273015 (उत्तर प्रिेि)
मोबाइल: 09235406193
ईमेल: [email protected]
17
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
2832 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
औद्योजगक एस्ट्टेट, नजनी,
ृी.ओ. उद्योग नगर, नजनी - 211 009
इलािाबाि (उत्तर प्रिेि)
िूरभार्: 0532-2697050, 2697218/2695847
ईमेल: [email protected]
18
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
उृ िा ा
मानसरोवर कॉम्प्लेक्स, सी -30 / 35-बी, िूसरी मंजिल, मालिइ ा,
वाराणसी - 221001, उत्तर प्रिेि
टेलीफजक्स: 0542-2370223
ईमेल: [email protected]
19
आंचजलक का ािल (उत्तर- II)
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
आंचजलक का ािल उत्तर- II
गुरु गोसवंि ससंि टॉवर,
ढोलेवाल चौक के ृास, िी. टी. रोड,
लुजि ाना -141 003 (ृंिाब)
िूरभार्: 0161-2541946 / 2546523/2530940
ईमेल: [email protected]
20
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
गुरु गोसवंि ससंि टॉवर,
ढोलेवाल चौक के ृास, िी. टी. रोड,
लुजि ाना -141 003 (ृंिाब)
िूरभार्: 0161-2546523 / 2531946/2530940
ईमेल: [email protected]
21
राष्ट्री अनुसूजचत िाजत/अनुसूजचत िनिाजत िब का ािल
ृिली मंजिल, फ्रंठट र टॉवर,
िी. टी. रोड, जमलर गंि (फा र जिगेड का ािल के ृास),
लुजि ाना 141003 (ृंिाब)
िूरभार्: 0161-4100939 मोब: 9815804349,
ईमेल: [email protected]
22
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
उृ िा ा
िुकान सि का ािल , 11-12, गौिाला मंडी,
िी. टी. रोड, ृानीृत -132103 (िठर ाणा)
िूरभार्: 0180-4002721, टेलीफजक्स नंबर 0180-2670608,
ईमेल: [email protected]
23
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
ग्राउंड फ्लोर, बीएसएनएल एडजमन जबसल्डंग,
केनरा बैंक भवन के सा ,
जृकाजडली जसनेमा के सामने,
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2833
सेक्टर -34-ए, चंडीगढ।
िूरभार्: 0172-2620539 / 0172-2620538
ईमेल: [email protected]
24
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
प्र म तल, एसएस आकेड,
बी-1-823 / 4, टांडा रोड, केएमवी कॉलेि के सामने
िालंिर - 144004 (ृंिाब)
िूरभार्: 0181-2292242, 2295533, 6570257
ईमेल: [email protected]
25
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
उृ िा ा
माफित कमरा नंबर 12, डीआईसी कॉम्प्लेक्स,
प्रिििनी मजिान,
िम्मू 180 001
िूरभार्: 0191-2564934
26
आंचजलक का ािल (ृजिम)
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
आंचजलक का ािल , ृजिम,
का ािल नंबर 505, ृांचवीं मंजिल,
"जमत्तल कमर्िि ल जबसल्डंग",
सवंग - बी, जवलेि मरोल,
एम. वी. रोड, अंिेरी (ृूवि),
मुंबई - 400 059
िूरभार्: 022-2850 0377,
ईमेल: [email protected]
27
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
ृी-104, एमआईडीसी जरन, टीटीसी औद्योजगक क्षेत्र,
कोृर जरन, नवी मुंबई -400710
िूरभार्: 022-27620865, 27618080/8989
ई-मेल: [email protected]
28
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
उृ िा ा / राष्ट्री अनुसूजचत िाजत और अनुसूजचत िनिाजत िब
का ािल ,
प्रेस्ट् टीि चजम्बर, प्र म तल,
कल् ाण स्ट्रीट, मजस्ट्िि ृूवि,
मुंबई 400,009
िूरभार्: 022-23728902, 022-49710065 मोबाइल:
9987244725,
ईमेल: [email protected]
29
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
उृ िा ा
2834 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
श्रीिी कॉम्प्लेक्स, चौ ी मंजिल,
मनोिांजत िोटल के ृास,
डॉ। िािा वजद्य रोड, ृणिी - 403 001 (गोवा)
टेलीफजक्स: 0832-2220540
ईमेल: [email protected]
30
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
न ा सजचवाल जबसल्डंग, ृिली मंजिल, ईस्ट्ट सवंग,
वीसीए स्ट्टेजड म के सामने, सेंट उसुिला स्ट्कूल के सा में,
जसजवल लाइंस, नागृुर - 440001
िूरभार्: 0712-2543524 / 2552023
ईमेल: [email protected]
31
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
211, 212, िूसरी मंजिल, टाइम स्ट्वा र जबसल्डंग,
साईंबाबा मंदिर, ृुणे-सतारा रोड के ृास,
गुलटेकडी, स्ट्वारगेट, ृुणे -411037
िूरभार्: 020-24273800, 24274800,48620207
ईमेल: [email protected]
32
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
माफित मेजस ा, ृी -15, एमआईडीसी, वालुि, मोरे चौक,
औरंगाबाि - 431136 (मिाराष्ट्र),
िूरभार्: 0240-2552300, फजक्स: 0240-2563799
ईमेल: [email protected]
33
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
3 ए, तीसरी मंजिल, गुंडेचा ओन्क्लेव,
जरानी रोड, साकीनाका, अंिेरी (ृूवि),
मुंबई - 400022
िूरभार्: 022-2850 9915/16
ईमेल: [email protected]
34
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
204, जद्वती तल, ब्लॉक-ए, दक्रस्ट्टल आकेड,
लोिीृारा चौक के ृास, िंकर नगर,
रा ृुर - 492 007 (छत्तीसगढ),
िूरभार्: 0771-4035388, 4060070
ईमेल: [email protected]
35
आंचजलक का ािल (मध् )
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
आंचजलक का ािल (मध् ),
202, समषजद्ध भवन,
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2835
ृुराने गुिरात उच्च न् ा ाल के सामने,
अिमिाबाि -380 014
िूरभार्: 079-27543228 27544893
ईमेल: [email protected]
36
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
10, ृोलोग्राउंड, औद्योजगक एस्ट्टेट,
इंिौर - 452015 (मध् प्रिेि)
िूरभार्: 0731-2424408 / 09, फजक्स: 0731-2422248
ईमेल: [email protected]
37
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
110, मालवी नगर, भोृाल -462 003
मध् प्रिेि
िूरभार्: 0755-4295152 / 2766205
ईमेल: [email protected]
38
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
202, समषजद्ध भवन,
ृुराने गुिरात उच्च न् ा ाल के सामने,
अिमिाबाि -380 014
िूरभार्: 079-27543228 / 27544893
ईमेल: [email protected]
39
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
105-106, िोटल जवराि जबसल्डंग,
गुरुिेव वाजणजज् क ृठरसर के सामने,
स ाली रोड ृर,
जसलवासा - 396 230, (िािर, नगर और िवेली संघ राज् क्षेत्र)
िूरभार्: 0260-2640271, 2640272
ईमेल: [email protected]
40
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
404, राििंस जबसल्डंग,
िे.के. टावर के सामने, ररंग रोड,
सूरत (गुिरात)।
िूरभार्: 0261-2345733, 4029735,
फजक्स: 261-4039735
ईमेल: [email protected]
41
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
एनएफ /0/2, नेिप प्लेस, टोंक रोड,
ि ृुर – 302015, (रािस्ट् ान),
2836 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िूरभार्: 0141-2742991 / 2742372/2742944
ईमेल: [email protected]
42
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
513, अलंकार प्लािा, सेंरल स्ट्ृाइन,
जवद्यािर नगर,
ि ृुर -302023, (रािस्ट् ान)
िूरभार्: 0141-2231594, 2231573,
फजक्स: 0141-2231572
ईमेल: [email protected]
43
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
बी -294, 295 (िी), ृिली मंजिल, मंगलम िाउस,
रीको चौक, जभवाड़ी - 301 019, (रािस्ट् ान)
िूरभार्: 01493-220031
ईमेल: [email protected]
44
आंचजलक का ािल (ृूवि- I)
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
आंचजलक का ािल (ृूवि),
20-बी, अब्िुल िमीि स्ट्रीट, 7वीं मंजिल,
कोलकाता -700 069, (ृजिम बंगाल)।
िूरभार्: 033-22435493 / 22487357
ईमेल: [email protected]
45
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
20-बी, अब्िुल िमीि स्ट्रीट, 7वीं मंजिल,
कोलकाता -700 069, (ृजिम बंगाल)
िूरभार्: 033-2213-7084 / 2248-7357
ईमेल: [email protected]
46
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
उृ िा ा,
चजतन् कॉम्प्लेक्स प्लॉट नंबर सीए -4, फेस II
बंगाल अंबुिा, जसटी सेंटर,
िुगािृुर - 713216
िूरभार्: 0343-2542165,
फजक्स: 0343-2549975
ईमेल: [email protected]
47
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल / राष्ट्री अनुसूजचत िाजत और अनुसूजचत िनिाजत िब
का ािल
ब्लॉक - सीृी, प्लॉट नंबर 7/7 और 7/8, सेक्टर - V,
साल्ट लेक जसटी, कोलकाता - 700091
िूरभार्: 033-23670155, 23672416
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2837
ईमेल: [email protected]
48
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल / राष्ट्री अनुसूजचत िाजत और अनुसूजचत िनिाजत िब
का ािल
104, प्र म तल, मन्ना सुरती कॉम्प्लेक्स,
डॉक्टर रोड, ृटना 800 001 (जबिार),
िूरभार्: 0612-3212403, 2354222
ईमेल: [email protected]
49
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड
जवजिक और वसूली प्रको् ,
कमरा नंबर 2/1, िूसरी मंजिल, हुडको टॉवर,
न् ू माकेट, 15 एन, नेल् ली सेनगुप्ता सठरणी,
सलंडसे स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता -700087
िूरभार्: 033-22522232
ईमेल: [email protected]
50
आंचजलक का ािल (ृूवि- II)
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
आंचजलक का ािल (ृूवि -2),
303-बी, तीसरी मंजिल, एनएसआईसी-आएमडीसी, िमिृि भवन,
इडको प्लॉट नं. 6 ब्लॉक-डी, मन्चेश्वर औद्योजगक एस्ट्टेट,
भुवनेश्वर
िूरभार्: 0674-2587875
ईमेल: [email protected]
51
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
मॉड्यूल नंबर 204, जद्वती तल, एनएसआईसी-आएमडीसी, िमिृि
भवन,
इडको प्लॉट नंबर 6, ब्लॉक-डी, मन्चेश्वर औद्योजगक एस्ट्टेट,
भुवनेश्वर-750,017
िूरभार्: 0674-2548875 / 2549780
ईमेल: [email protected]
52
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
उृ-िा ा,
न्ना नगर, औद्योजगक एस्ट्टेट ृुठर ा,
कटक - 753012 (ओजडिा)।
िूरभार्: 0674-2549780, 2548875
53
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
प्लॉट नंबर िेिेिे -16, जसजवल टाउनजिृ,
राउरकेला - 769004, जिला - सुंिरगढ (ओजडिा)
िूरभार्: 01661-2665059, 2664459
ईमेल: [email protected]
54
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
2838 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
फ्लजट नंबर ए -2 / 1, िूसरी मंजिल,
नीरोड अृाटिमेंट, एल-रोड,
ृी.ओ. और ृी.एस. जबष्टुृुर,
िमिेिृुर -831001 (झार ंड)
मोबाइल: 9031999000/9031504051
ईमेल: [email protected]
55
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
उृ िा ा,
बा ृास रोड चास, बोकारो (झार ंड)
मोबाइल: 09431923065
ईमेल: [email protected]
56
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल / राष्ट्री अनुसूजचत िाजत अनुसूजचत िनिाजत िब
का ािल
उद्योग भवन, औद्योजगक क्षेत्र,
कोकर, रांची -834001
ईमेल: [email protected]
57
आंचजलक का ािल (उत्तर ृूवि)
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
आंचजलक का ािल (उत्तर ृूवि),
आंचजलक का ािल , उत्तर ृूवि, औद्योजगक एस्ट्टेट, बा लेन नं. 3,
बामुनीमेिम, गुवािाटी -781 0621
िूरभार्: 0361-2657952 / 0361-2657947 / 48
ईमेल: [email protected]
58
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
इंडजस्ट्र ल इस्ट्टेट, बा लेन नं. 3, बामुनीमेिम,
गुवािाटी -781 021
िूरभार्: 0361-2657952, 0361-2657947 / 48
ईमेल: [email protected]
59
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
उृ िा ा,
उठरृोक अचोम लईकाई,
इंफाल -795 001 (मजणृुर)
टेलीफजक्स: 0385-2414270
ईमेल: [email protected]
60
राष्ट्री अनुसूजचत िाजत अनुसूजचत िनिाजत िब का ािल ,
डीआईसी कॉम्प्लेक्स, िॉटि राउंड रोड,
औद्योजगक एस्ट्टेट, जिलांग -793 001
(मेघाल )
िूरभार्: 8100799171
ईमेल: [email protected]
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2839
61
आंचजलक का ािल (िजक्षण- I)
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
आंचजलक का ािल (िजक्षण- I),
नंबर 25, प्र म मेन रोड, केएसएसआईडीसी औद्योजगक एस्ट्टेट,
छ ा ब्लॉक, रािािीनगर,
बेंगलुरु - 560010
िूरभार्: 080-23307790,
टेलीफजक्स: 080-23145227
ईमेल: [email protected]
62
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
नंबर 25, प्र म मेन रोड, केएसएसआईडीसी औद्योजगक एस्ट्टेट,
छ ा ब्लॉक, रािािीनगर,
बेंगलुरु - 560 044 (कनािटक)
िूरभार्: 080-23109059 / 23307791, 23147858
ईमेल: [email protected]
63
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
सी-424, ृीन् ा फस्ट् टि स्ट्टेि,
ृीन् ा ृुजलस स्ट्टेिन के ृीछे,
बेंगलुरु - 560 058
िूरभार्: 080-28374676, 28372977, 28394576
ईमेल: [email protected]
64
राष्ट्री अनुसूजचत िाजत और अनुसूजचत िनिाजत िब का ािल
नंबर 6 और 7, आईएसआईसीओएस जबसल्डंग, वेस्ट्ट ऑफ कॉडि रोड
रािािीनगर औद्योजगक नगर
बेंगलुप - 560 044
िूरभार्: 9343723999, 080-23147791
ईमेल: [email protected]
65
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
एस -67, िीसीडीए कमर्िि ल कॉम्प्लेक्स, मरीन ड्राइव,
िनमुगम रोड, अणािकुलम,
कोचीन - 682 031 (केरल)
िूरभार्: 0484-2381850, फजक्स: 0484-2368149
ईमेल: [email protected]
66
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
प्लॉट नंबर 60, अनुि जबसल्डंग,
5वां क्रॉस, सुभार्-चंर नगर,
फाउंड्री क्लस्ट्टर जबसल्डंग के सामने,
उत्सव िोटल के ृास, बेलगाम -590006।
टेलीफजक्स: 0831-2449922
2840 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ईमेल: [email protected]
67
आंचजलक का ािल (िजक्षण- II)
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
आंचजलक का ािल (िजक्षण- II),
203, श्री ित्तासाई कॉम्प्लेक्स, आरटीसी ‘एक्स’ रोड,
मुिीराबाि, िजिराबाि -500 020
िूरभार्: 040-27122515 / 27615761/27622097
ईमेल: [email protected]
68
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
प्र म तल, प्लॉट नंबर 49, मेन रोड,
गुरु नानक कॉलोनी,
जवि वाड़ा - 520 008
िूरभार्: 0866-2541055
ईमेल: [email protected]
69
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
डी.सं. 6-67-27 / 2/3,
गिुवाका ृुजलस स्ट्टेिन के सामने,
मेन गेट सीजन र, श्रजमक नगर, गिुवाका,
जविा ाृत्तनम - 530026
टेलीफजक्स: 0891-2768554
ईमेल: [email protected]
70
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
डोर नंबर 6-3-144 और 144/1,
ििााँआरा करीम कॉम्प्लेक्स, तीसरी मंजिल,
बालानगर, िजिराबाि - 50003 500
िूरभार्: 040-23777880
ईमेल: [email protected]
71
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
202, 203, श्री ित्तासाई कॉम्प्लेक्स,
आरटीएक्स ’X’ रोड, मुिीराबाि,
िजिराबाि -500 020
िूरभार्: 040-27122515,
फजक्स: 040-27617777
ईमेल: [email protected]
72
आंचजलक का ािल (िजक्षण- III)
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
आंचजलक का ािल (िजक्षण- III),
न ा नंबर 422 (ृुराना नंबर 615,) अन्ना सलाई
चेन्नई -600 006 (तजमलनाडु)
िूरभार्: 044-28291943, फजक्स: 044-28295791,
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2841
ईमेल: [email protected]
73
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
न ा नंबर 422 (ृुराना नंबर 615), अन्ना सलाई,
चेन्नई -600 006 (तजमलनाडु),
िूरभार्: 044-28293347 / 28294541/28294066
ईमेल: [email protected]
74
राष्ट्री अनुसूजचत िाजत अनुसूजचत िनिाजत िब का ािल ,
सूक्ष् म, लघु और मध् म उद्यम-डीआई, सं् ा 65/1, िी. टी. रोड,
गुइंडी, चेन्नई - 32
िूरभार्: 044-48631200
75
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
प्रिासजनक भवन, औद्योजगक एस्ट्टेट,
ेटनचावडी, ृांजडचेरी -605009
िूरभार्: 0413-2248970, 2248940,
ईमेल: [email protected]
76
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
नंबर 309, जसडको-एआईईएमए टॉवर,
तीसरी मंजिल, फस्ट् टि मेन रोड, अम्बत्तूर औद्योजगक एस्ट्टेट,
अम्बत्तूर, चेन्नई 600058
िूरभार्: 044-28291292
ईमेल: [email protected]
77
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
74, एडीआर टावसि प्र म तल, ृी. ृी. चावड़ी,
कलावसल, ेनी मेन रोड, मिुरज - 625 016
िूरभार्: 0452 - 2609992, 2609993, 2604322
ईमेल: [email protected]
78
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
1055/10, गौतम केंर, अवनीि रोड,
को ंबतूर -641 018,
िूरभार्: 0422-2244618 / 2247757
ईमेल: [email protected]
79
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम जलजमटेड,
िा ा का ािल
नंबर 10/1, िूसरी मंजिल, "फ्रें्स प्लािा"
ब्सि रोड, छावनी
जत्रची 620 001
िूरभार्: 0431-2414541
2842 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
मोबाइल: 8884692930
ईमेल: [email protected]
80
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम तकनीकी केंर
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम तकनीकी सेवा केंर,
सेक्टर बी -24, गुइंडी इंडजस्ट्र ल एस्ट्टेट,
एक् कािु ंगल ृीओ,
चेन्नई - 600032 (तजमलनाडु)।
िूरभार्: 044-22254501, 044-22252335 / 6/7/8
ईमेल: [email protected]
81
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम तकनीकी सेवा केंर,
कुसईगुड़ा इलेक्रॉजनक कॉम्प्लेक्स,
कमलानगर, ईसीआईएल ृीओ, िजिराबाि -500 062
िूरभार्: 040-27124597 / 27121422/27126646
ईमेल: [email protected]
82
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम तकनीकी सेवा केंर
ओ ला औद्योजगक एस्ट्टेट,
नई दिल्ली -110 020
िूरभार्: 011-26826847 / 26826941, फजक्स: 011-26826783
83
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम तकनीकी सेवा केंर
आिी औद्योजगक क्षेत्र, 80 फीट रोड,
भावनगर रोड, रािकोट-360 003
िूरभार्: 079-27544893 / 27541301
ईमेल: [email protected]
84
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम तकनीकी सेवा केंर
डी 82-83, फोकल प्वाइंट, ृुरानी क् ूएमसी जबसल्डंग
रािृुरा -140 401 (ृंिाब)
िूरभार्: 01762-657301,
फजक्स: 01762-232669
ईमेल: [email protected]
85
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम तकनीकी सेवा केंर
ए-1, औद्योजगक एस्ट्टेट,
अलीगढ -20111 (उत्तर प्रिेि)
िूरभार्: 0571-2400364, फजक्स: 0571-2403552
ईमेल: [email protected]
86
प्रिििनी सि जवृणन जवकास जबिनेस ृाकि,
मॉड्यूल सं. 207, ईएमडीबीृी जबसल्डंग,
इसीआईएल ृी.ओ. कमलानगर, कुिाईगुड़ा
िजिराबाि -500062 (आंध्र प्रिेि)
िूरभार्: 040-27141422, 27125802
ईमेल: [email protected]
87
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम तकनीकी सेवा केंर,
जतगांव रोड, नीमका,
फरीिाबाि -121004 (िठर ाणा)
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2843
िूरभार्: 0129-2401101
ईमेल: [email protected]
88
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम तकनीकी सेवा केंर
ृी.ओ. बाजलजतकुरी, िावड़ा -711 402
िूरभार्: 033-26530304
ईमेल: [email protected]
89
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम प्रजिक्षण केंर
1714/663, ग्राम - िालल, ृी.ओ. कनजि,
तिसील - सुंिरनगर,
जिला- मंडी- 175 010 (जिमाचल प्रिेि),
िूरभार्: 09816360071,
ईमेल: [email protected]
90
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम तकनीकी प्रजिक्षण केंर
बीएसएनएल का ािल और डाकघर के सामने,
के.िी.एफ - 563 112, कोलार जिला,
कनािटक।
मोब: 09008900211, 9481068037
ईमेल: [email protected]
91
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम प्रजिक्षण सि इंक् ुबेिन केंर
प्लॉट नंबर 18, सोंडा मौिा, मंडी सजमजत के ृास
िेवठर ा -274001 (उत्तर प्रिेि)
िूरभार्: 05568-651120, मोब: 9455766037
ईमेल: [email protected]
92
राष्ट्री लघु उद्योग जनगम -आिीजवका व् वसा इंक् ूबेटर- नवािा
प्लॉट नंबर 1619, गुरुिेव नगर, सरकारी आईटीआई के ृास,
गोनवा रोड, नवािा,
जबिार-805,130
मोबाइल: 8539038073
[फा. सं. के-01/4/2020-एसएमई]
मसी एृाओ, जनिेिक
MINISTRY OF MICRO, SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES
(SME Section)
New Delhi, the 6th November, 2020
S.O. 1008.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction of
Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (40 of 1971) and in supersession of the notification of the Government of
India in the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises number S.O. 865, dated the 12th May, 2016,
published in the Gazette of India, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), dated the 14th May, 2016, except as
respects things done or omitted to be done before such supersession, the Central Government hereby appoints
the officer mentioned in column (1) of the Table below, being an officer equivalent to the rank of the Gazetted
Officer of the Central Government to be Estate Officer for the purpose of the said Act and further directs that
the said officer shall exercise the powers conferred and perform the duties imposed on Estate Officer by or
under the said Act within the limits of his jurisdiction in respect of public premises specified in column (2) of
the said Table.
2844 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
TABLE
Designation of officer
Categories of public premises and local limits of jurisdiction
(1)
(2)
Shri Navin Chopra, Chief General
Manager – Selection Grade, the
National Small Industries Corporation
Limited, New Delhi.
Premise owned or taken on lease from time to time by the National
Small Industries Corporation Limited in the National Capital
territory of Delhi and in other places where its Zonal Offices,
Branch and Sub-Branch Offices, Technical Service Centres are
situated as mentioned in Annexure.
ANNEXURE
S.No.
Offices
Address
(1)
(2)
(3)
1.
Corporate Office
National Small Industries Corporation Limited
(A Government of India Enterprise)
National Small Industries Corporation Bhawan,
Okhla Industrial Estate,
New Delhi – 110 020
Tel: 011-26926275, 26926370,
Toll free No. 1800111955
Fax: 011-26932075, 26311109
Email: [email protected],
Website: www.nsic.co.in
2.
Zonal Office (National Capital
Region)
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Zonal Office(National Capital Region),
National Small Industries Corporation Technical Services Centre
Complex
Okhla Industrial Estate, New Delhi-110020
Tel: 011-26382350, 011-40584930
Email: [email protected]
3.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office
National Small Industries Corporation Technical Service Centre
Complex
Okhla Industrial Estate, New Delhi-110020
Tel: 011-26382568/69
Email: [email protected]
4.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office
CB-326, Second Floor, Ring Road,
Naraina, New Delhi – 110028
Tel: 011-64611484, 25775787
Email: [email protected]
5.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office
Z-99, First Floor, Mama Chowk, M.I.E. Part-A,
Delhi Rohtak Road,
Bahadurgarh – 124 507 (Haryana)
Tel: 01276-267551,
Email: [email protected]
6.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
Plot No. 69, IDC, Sector-16,
MG Road, Gurugram,
Haryana – 122001
Tel: 0124-2308913,
Fax:0124-2220543
Email: [email protected]
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2845
7.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office
Plot No.107, Nissan Hut, NH-5, Railway Road
Faridabad – 121 001 (Haryana)
Tel: 0129-4311249/52/92/93
Fax: 0129-4311293
Email: [email protected],
Email: [email protected]
8.
Zonal Office (North-I)
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Zonal Office North-I,
C-41, Sector - 58, NOIDA(U.P) - 201301
Tel: 0120-4546198, 4546197
Email: [email protected]
9.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office
III-B/118-B, Sector-18, Shopping Complex
Noida – 201 301 (U.P.)
Tel: 0120-4595000-45, 0120-251179
Email: [email protected]
10.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
Near Sabji Mandi, Niranjanpur,
Saharanpur Road, Dehradun-248001
Tel: 0135-2520501
Email: [email protected]
11.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Sub Branch / Training-cum-Incubation Centre
B-1, B-5, Industrial Estate, Bazpur Road,
Kashipur, Uttarakhand
Tel: 0135-2520501
Email: [email protected]
12.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office, T-6, 307, 118/8,
3rd Floor, Maruti Plaza, Sanjay Place,
(Behind Sanjay Talkies)
Agra – 282 002
Tel: 0562-2527862/ 2525567 / 2524842
Email: [email protected]
13.
National Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Hub Office,
Padam Business Park, Unit No. 202,
2nd Floor, Plot No. INS-1,
Sector-13A, Avas Vikas, Sikandra Yojna,
Agra-282007 (Uttar Pradesh)
Email: [email protected]
14.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office / National Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe
Hub Office
503, 5th Floor, Shri Ram Tower,
13, Ashok Marg, Lucknow-226001
Tel: 0522-2288803
Email : [email protected]
15.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
112/1, Benajhabar Road, (2nd Floor),
Kanpur – 208 002 (Uttar Pradesh)
Tel: 0512-2535049
Email: [email protected]
16.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Sub Branch
DIC Campus, Gorakhnath Industrial Estate,
Gorakhpur – 273 015 (Uttar Pradesh)
2846 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Mob: 09235406193
Email: [email protected]
17.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office
Industrial Estate, Naini,
P.O. Udyog Nagar, Naini - 211 009
Allahabad (Uttar Pradesh)
Tel : 0532-2697050, 2697218/2695847
Email: [email protected]
18.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Sub Branch
Mansarovar Complex, C-30/35-B, 2nd Floor, Maldhaiya,
Varanasi – 221001, Uttar Pradesh
Telefax: 0542-2370223
Email: [email protected]
19.
Zonal Office (North-II)
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Zonal Office North-II
Guru Govind Singh Tower,
Near Dholewal Chowk, G.T. Road,
Ludhiana-141 003 (Punjab)
Tel: 0161-2541946/2546523/2530940
Email: [email protected]
20.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
Guru Govind Singh Tower,
Near Dholewal Chowk, G.T. Road,
Ludhiana-141 003 (Punjab)
Tel : 0161-2546523/2531946/2530940
Email: [email protected]
21.
National Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Hub Office
1st Floor, Frontier Tower,
G.T. Road, Miller Ganj (Near Fire Brigade Office),
Ludhiana 141003 (Punjab)
Tel: 0161-4100939 Mob: 9815804349,
Email: [email protected]
22.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Sub Branch
Shop Cum Office, 11-12, Gaushala Mandi,
G.T. Road, Panipat -132103 (Haryana)
Tel. : 0180-4002721, Telefax No. 0180-2670608,
Email: [email protected]
23.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
Ground Floor, BSNL Admin Building,
Adjoining to Canara Bank Building,
Opposite to Piccadilly Cinema,
Sector-34-A, Chandigarh.
Tel: 0172-2620539/0172-2620538
Email: [email protected]
24.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office
First Floor, SS Arcade,
B-1-823/4, Tanda Road, Opp. KMV College
Jalandhar – 144004 (Punjab)
Tel: 0181-2292242, 2295533, 6570257
Email: [email protected]
25.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Sub Branch
C/o Room No.12, DIC Complex,
Exhibition Ground,
Jammu 180 001
Tel: 0191-2564934
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2847
26.
Zonal Office (West)
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Zonal Office, West,
Office No. 505, Fifth Floor,
“Mittal Commercial Building”,
Wing – B, Village Marol,
Off M.V. Road, Andheri (East),
Mumbai-400 059
Tel: 022-2850 0377,
Email: [email protected]
27.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office
P-104, MIDC Khairane, TTC Industrial Area,
Koparkhairane, Navi Mumbai-400710
Tel: 022-27620865, 27618080/8989
Email: [email protected]
28.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Sub Branch/National Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Hub
Office,
Prestige Chamber, 1st Floor,
Kalyan Street, Maszid East,
Mumbai-400009
Tel: 022-23728902, 022-49710065 Mob: 9987244725,
Email: [email protected]
29.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Sub Branch
Shriji Complex, 4th Floor,
Near Manoshanthi Hotel,
Dr. Dada Vaidhya Road, Panaji – 403 001 (Goa)
Telefax : 0832-2220540
Email: [email protected]
30.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office
New Secretariat Building, 1st Floor, East Wing,
Opp. VCA Stadium, Beside St. Ursula School,
Civil Lines, Nagpur – 440001
Tel: 0712-2543524 /2552023
Email: [email protected]
31.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office
211,212, 2nd Floor, Time Square Building,
Near Saibaba Mandir, Pune-Satara Road,
Gultekdi, Swargate, Pune-411037
Tel : 020-24273800, 24274800,48620207
Email: [email protected]
32.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office
C/o MASSIA, P-15, MIDC, Waluj, More Chowk,
Aurangabad – 431136 (Maharashtra),
Tel: 0240-2552300, Fax:0240-2563799
Email: [email protected]
33.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
3A, 3rd Floor, Gundecha Onclave,
Khairani Road, Sakinaka, Andheri (East),
Mumbai - 400 072
Tel: 022-2850 9915 / 16
Email: [email protected]
34.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
204, IInd Floor, Block-A, Crystal Arcade,
Near Lodhipara Chowk, Shankar Nagar,
2848 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Raipur – 492 007 (Chattisgarh),
Tel: 0771-4035388, 4060070
Email: [email protected]
35.
Zonal Office (Central)
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Zonal Office (Central),
202, Samruddhi Building,
Opposite of Old Gujarat High Court,
Ahmedabad-380 014
Tel : 079-27543228 27544893
Email : [email protected]
36.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office
10, Pologround, Industrial Estate,
Indore – 452 015 (Madhya Pradesh)
Tel : 0731-2424408/09, Fax : 0731-2422248
Email: [email protected]
37.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
110, Malvia Nagar, Bhopal –462 003
Madhya Pradesh
Tel: 0755-4295152 / 2766205
Email: [email protected]
38.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
202, Samruddhi Building,
Opposite of Old Gujarat High Court,
Ahmedabad-380 014
Tel : 079-27543228 / 27544893
Email: [email protected]
39.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
105-106, Hotel Viraj Building,
Opposite of Gurudev Commercial Complex,
Off Sayli Road,
Silvassa – 396 230, (UT of Dadar, Nagar & Haveli)
Tel: 0260-2640271, 2640272
Email: [email protected]
40.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office
404, Rajhans Building,
Opposite of J.K. Tower, Ring Road,
Surat (Gujarat).
Tel: 0261-2345733, 4029735,
Fax: 0261-4039735
Email : [email protected]
41.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office
NF /0 /2, Nehru Place, Tonk Road,
Jaipur – 302 015, (Rajasthan),
Tel: 0141-2742991/2742372/2742944
Email: [email protected]
42.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
513, Alankar Plaza, Central Spine,
Vidyadhar Nagar,
Jaipur -302 023, (Rajasthan)
Tel : 0141-2231594, 2231573,
Fax : 0141-2231572
Email : [email protected]
43.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
B-294, 295 (G), 1st Floor, Manglam House,
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2849
RIICO Chowk, Bhiwadi – 301 019, (Rajasthan)
Tel: 01493-220031.
Email: [email protected]
44. Zonal Office (East-I)
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Zonal Office(East),
20-B, Abdul Hamid Street, 7th Floor,
Kolkata-700 069, (West Bengal).
Tel: 033-22435493/22487357
Email : [email protected]
45.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
20-B, Abdul Hamid Street, 7th Floor,
Kolkata-700 069, (West Bengal)
Tel: 033-22137084/22487357
Email: [email protected]
46.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Sub Branch,
Chaitanya Complex Plot No. CA-4, Phase II
Bengal Ambuja, City Centre,
Durgapur - 713216
Tel: 0343-2542165,
Fax: 0343-2549975
Email: [email protected]
47.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office / National Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe
Hub Office
Block – CP, Plot No. 7/7 & 7/8, Sector – V,
Salt Lake City, Kolkata – 700091
Tel: 033-23670155, 23672416
Email: [email protected]
48.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office/ National Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe
Hub Office
104, 1st Floor, Manna Surti Complex,
Doctor’s Road, Patna 800 001 (Bihar),
Tel: 0612-3212403, 2354222
Email: [email protected]
49.
National Small Industries
Corporation Limited Legal and
Recovery Cell
Room No.2/1, 2nd Floor, HUDCO Tower,
New Market, 15N, Nelli Sengupta Serini,
Lindsay Street, Kolkata -700087
Tel: 033-22522232
Email: [email protected]
50.
Zonal Office (East-II)
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Zonal Office(East-2),
303-B, 3rd Floor, NSIC-IMDC, Dharampad Bhavan,
IDCO Plot no. 6 Block-D, Mancheswar Industrial Estate,
Bhubaneshwar
Tel: 0674-2587875
Email: [email protected]
51.
National Small Industries Corporation Ltd., Branch Office
Module No.204, 2nd Floor, NSIC-IMDC, Dharmpad Bhawan,
IDCO Plot No.6, Block-D, Mancheswar Industrial Estate,
Bhuvaneshvar-750017
Tel: 0674-2548875 / 2549780
Email: [email protected]
52.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Sub-Branch,
Khanna Nagar, Industrial Estate Khapuria,
Cuttack – 753012 (Odisha).
Tel: 0674-2549780, 2548875
2850 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
53.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
Plot No.JJJ-16, Civil Township,
Rourkela – 769004, District - Sundergarh (Odisha)
Tel :01661-2665059, 2664459
Email: [email protected]
54.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office
Flat No. A-2/1, 2nd Floor,
Nirode Apartment, L-Road,
P.O. & P.S. Bistupur,
Jamshedpur-831001 (Jharkhand)
Mob: 9031999000/9031504051
Email: [email protected]
55.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Sub Branch,
By-Pass Road Chas, Bokaro (Jharkhand)
Mob: 09431923065
Email: [email protected]
56.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office/ National Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe
Hub Office
Udyog Bhawan, Industrial Area,
Kokar, Ranchi-834001
Email: [email protected]
57. Zonal Office (North East)
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Zonal Office (North East),
Zonal Office, North East, Industrial Estate, Bye Lane No.3,
Bamunimaidam, Guwahati-781 021
Tel: 0361-2657952 / 0361-2657947/48
Email : [email protected]
58.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
Industrial Estate, Bye Lane No.3, Bamunimaidam,
Guwahati-781 021
Tel: 0361-2657952, 0361-2657947/48
Email: [email protected]
59.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Sub Branch,
Uripok Achom Leikai,
Imphal-795 001 (Manipur)
Telefax: 0385-2414270
Email: [email protected]
60.
National Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Hub Office,
DIC Complex, Short Round Road,
Industrial Estate, Shilong –793 001
(Meghalaya)
Tel: 8100799171
Email: [email protected]
61. Zonal Office (South-I)
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Zonal Office (South-I),
No. 25, 1st Main Road, KSSIDC Industrial Estate,
6th Block, Rajajinagar,
Bengaluru – 560010
Tel: 080-23307790,
Telefax: 080-23145227
Email: [email protected]
62.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office
No. 25, 1ST Main Road, KSSIDC Industrial Estate,
6th Block, Rajajinagar,
Bengaluru - 560 044 (Karnataka)
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2851
Tel: 080-23109059/23307791, 23147858
Email : [email protected]
63.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
C-424, Peenya 1st Stage,
Behind Peenya Police Station,
Bengaluru – 560 058
Tel: 080-28374676, 28372977, 28394576
Email: [email protected]
64.
National Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Hub Office
No.6 and 7, ISICOS Building, West of Chord Road
Rajajinagar Industrial Town
Bengaluru - 560 044
Tel: 9343723999, 080-23147791
Email: [email protected]
65.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
S-67, GCDA Commercial Complex, Marine Drive,
Shanmugam Road, Ernakulam,
Cochin – 682 031(Kerala)
Tel : 0484-2381850, Fax : 0484-2368149
Email: [email protected]
66.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
Plot No. 60, Anujay Building,
5th Cross, Subhash-Chandra Nagar,
Opposite of Foundry Cluster Building,
Near Utsav Hotel, Belgaum -590006.
Telefax: 0831-2449922
Email : [email protected]
67. Zonal Office (South-II)
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Zonal Office (South-II),
203, Sri Dattasai Complex, RTC ‘X’ Road,
Musheerabad, Hyderabad-500 020
Tel: 040-27122515/27615761/27622097
Email: [email protected]
68.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
Ist Floor, Plot No.49, Main Road,
Guru Nanak Colony,
Vijayawada – 520 008
Tel: 0866-2541055
Email: [email protected]
69.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
D.No. 6-67-27/2/3,
Opposite of Gajuwaka Police Station,
Main Gate Senior, Sramika Nagar, Gajuwaka,
Visakhapatnam – 530026
Telefax: 0891-2768554
Email: [email protected]
70.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
Door No. 6-3-144 & 144/1,
Jahanara Kareem Complex, 3rd Floor,
Balanagar, Hyderabad - 500 037
Tel: 040-23777880
Email: [email protected]
71.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
202, 203, Sri Dattasai Complex,
2852 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
RTC ‘X’ Road, Musheerabad,
Hyderabad-500 020
Tel : 040-27122515,
Fax : 040-27617777
Email: [email protected]
72. Zonal Office (South-III)
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Zonal Office (South-III),
New No.422 (Old No.615,) Anna Salai
Chennai-600 006 (Tamilnadu)
Tel: 044-28291943, Fax: 044-28295791,
Email: [email protected]
73.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited, Branch Office
New No.422 (Old No.615,) Anna Salai,
Chennai-600 006 (Tamilnadu),
Tel: 044-28293347/28294541/28294066
Email: [email protected]
74.
National Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Hub Office,
Micro Small & Medium Enterprises –Development Institute,
NO 65/1, G.S.T. Road,
Guindy, Chennai –600032
Tel: 044-48631200
75.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
Administrative Building, Industrial Estate,
Thattanchavady, Pondicherry-605009
Tel: 0413-2248970, 2248940,
Email: [email protected]
76.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
No.309, SIDCO-AIEMA Tower,
3rd Floor, Ist Main Road, Ambattur Industrial Estate,
Ambattur, Chennai 600058
Tel: 044-28291292
Email: [email protected]
77.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
74, ADR Towers 1st Floor, P. P. Chavadi,
Kalavasal, Theni Main Road, Madurai - 625 016.
Tel: 0452 - 2609992, 2609993, 2604322
Email: [email protected]
78.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
1055/10, Gowtham Centre, Avnishi Road,
Coimbatore-641 018 ,
Tel :0422-2244618/ 2247757
Email: [email protected]
79.
National Small Industries Corporation Limited,
Branch Office,
No. 10/1, 2nd Floor, “Friends Plaza”
Birds Road, Cantonment
Trichy 620 001
Tel: 0431-2414541
Mob: 8884692930
Email: [email protected]
80.
National
Small
Industries
Corporation Technical Centres
National Small Industries Corporation Technical Service Centres,
Sector B-24, Guindy Industrial Estate,
Ekkaduthangal PO,
Chennai – 600032 (Tamilnadu).
Tel: 044-22254501, 044-22252335/6/7/8
Email: [email protected]
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2853
81.
National Small Industries Corporation Technical Service Centre,
Kusaiguda Electronic Complex,
Kamalanagar, ECIL P.O., Hyderabad -500 062
Tel: 040-27124597/ 27121422/27126646
Email: [email protected]
82.
National Small Industries Corporation Technical Service Centre,
Okhla Industrial Estate,
New Delhi-110 020.
Tel: 011-26826847/26826941,
Fax: 011-26826783
83.
National Small Industries Corporation Technical Service Centre,
Aji Industrial Estate, 80 Feet Road,
Bhavnagar Road, Rajkot-360 003
Tel: 079-27544893/27541301
Email: [email protected]
84.
National Small Industries Corporation Technical Service Centre,
D 82-83, Focal Point, Old QMC Building
Rajpura-140 401 (Punjab)
Tel : 01762-657301,
Fax : 01762-232669
Email: [email protected]
85.
National Small Industries Corporation Technical Service Centre,
A-1, Industrial Estate,
Aligarh-202 001 (Uttar Pradesh)
Tel: 0571-2400364,
Fax: 0571-2403552
Email: [email protected]
86.
Exhibition cum Marketing Development Business Park,
Module No.207, Exhibition-Cum-Marketing Development
Business Park Building, Electronics Corporation of India Limited
P.O. Kamalanagar, Kushaiguda
Hyderabad-500062 (Andhra Pradesh)
Tel: 040-27141422, 27125802
Email: [email protected]
87.
National Small Industries Corporation Technical Services Centre,
Tigoan Road, Neemka,
Faridabad -121004 (Haryana)
Tel: 0129-2401101
Email: [email protected]
88.
National Small Industries Corporation Technical Service Centre
P.O. Balitikuri, Howrah-711 402
Tel : 033-26530304
Email: [email protected]
89.
National Small Industries Corporation Training Centre
1714/663, Village – Halel, P.O. Kanaid,
Tehsil – Sundernagar,
District- Mandi– 175 010 (Himachal Pradesh),
Tel: 09816360071,
Email: [email protected]
90.
National Small Industries Corporation Technical Training Centre
Opposite to BSNL Office and Post Office,
K.G.F-563 112, Kolar District,
Karnataka.
Mob: 09008900211, 9481068037
Email: [email protected]
91.
National Small Industries Corporation Training cum Incubation
Centre
Plot No. 18, Sonda Mauja, Near Mandi Samiti,
Deoria-274001 (Uttar Pradesh)
Tel: 05568-651120, Mob: 9455766037
2854 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Email: [email protected]
92.
National Small Industries Corporation - Livelihood Business
Incubation Centre- Nawada
Plot No. 1619, Gurudev Nagar, Near Government ITI,
Gonava Road, Nawada,
Bihar-805130
Mob: 8539038073
[F. No. K-01/4/2020-SME]
MERCY EPAO, Director
-
ubZ fnYyh] 5 uoEcj] 2020
-—iapkV esa la”kks/ku ds fy;s lhthvkbZVh] caxyq# ls fnukad 20-10-2020 dk lanHkZ
la- lhthvkbZVh&,ylh@ch,uth@iapkV@vkbZMh@26@2015@869 izkIr gqvk gS] ftls fnukad 28-04-2020 ds vkbZMh
la- esa fnukad 06-07-2020 dh vf/klwpuk la- tsM&16025@4@2020&vkbZvkj ¼,e½ ds }kjk jkti= esa vf/klwfpr
fd;k x;k FkkA iapkV ds lapkyu Hkkx ds varxZr i`’B la- 17] iafDr la- 3 ij iapkV ds vkaf”kd la”kks/ku esa
^^fnukad 20-12-2013 ds ,Dl ,e&4** ds LFkku ij **fnukad 07-11-2014 ds ,Dl ,e&13** ds :i esa i<+k tk,A
la”kksf/kr iapkV blds lkFk layXu gS
[la- tsM-16025@4@2020-vkbZvkj ¼,e½]
uohu oS/k] mi funs”kd
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
CORRIGENDUM
New Delhi, the 5th November, 2020
S.O. 1009.—A reference No. CGIT-LC/BNG/Award/ID 26/2015/869 dated 20.10.2020 received from
CGIT, Bangalore, correcting the Award, which was notified in Gazette vide Notification No. Z-16025/4/2020-
IR(M) dated 06/07/2020 in Award I.D. No. 26/2015 dated 28.04.2020. In partial modification in Award at page
No. 17, line No. 3 under heading AWARD may be read as “ Ex M-13 dated 07.11.2014” instead of “ Ex M-4
dated 20.12.2013.” The corrected Award is annexed herewith.
[No. Z-16025/4/2020-IR(M)]
NAVIN VAIDYA, Dy. Director
ubZ fnYyh] 9 uoEcj] 2020
-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 300@2000½ dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 04-11-2020 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-20012@247@2000-vkbZvkj ¼lh,e-I½]
jktsUnz flag] MsLd vf/kdkjh@vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 9th November, 2020
S.O. 1010.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
No.1, Dhanbad (Ref. No.300 of 2000) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the
employers in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central
Government on 04.11.2020.
[No. L-20012/247/2000-IR(CM-I)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Desk Officer/Section Officer
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2855
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947
Reference: No. 300/2000
Employer in relation to the management of P. B. Area of M/s. BCCL.
AND
Their workman
Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers : Sri Gopal Tiwari. Asstt.
For the workman : None
State : Jharkhand.
Industry:- Coal
Dated : 30.06.2020
AWARD
By Order No.L-20012/247/2000-(C-I) dated 29/09/2000 the Central Government in the Ministry of
Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub–section (2A) of Section
10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the termination of Sri Bhola Lal Das by the management of BCCL Gopalichak
Colliery w.e.f. 18.09.93 is proper, justified and legal? If not, whether the workman is entitled to
be regularized in service as Mining Sirdar from the date of his appointment and to be reinstated
in service with back wages.”
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed and both the parties appeared for certain dates but
subsequently workman/union left taking step in this case. Further in course of hearing of the case, the learned
counsel of Union appeared on 11/09/2019 and informed that workman/ union was not interested in contesting
the case. It is felt that the workman/union has lost its interest in this matter. Hence “No dispute” award is
passed. communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 9 uoEcj] 2020
-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- &1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 250@2000½ dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 04-11-2020 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-20012@68@2000-vkbZvkj ¼lh,e-I½]
jktsUnz flag] MsLd vf/kdkjh@vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 9th November, 2020
S.O. 1011.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
No.1, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 250 of 2000) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the
employers in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central
Government on 04.11.2020.
[No. L-20012/68/2000-IR(CM-I)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Desk Officer/Section Officer
2856 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947
Reference: No. 250/2000
Employer in relation to the management of Sijua Area of M/s. BCCL
AND
Their workman
Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers : None
For the workman. : None
State : Jharkhand.
Industry:- Coal
Dated : 28.09.2020
AWARD
By Order No.L-20012/68/2000 (C-I) dated 29/08/2000 the Central Government in the Ministry of
Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub–section (2A) of Section
10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Mudidih Colliery of M/s. BCCL in not paying the
legal dues such as payment of life cover scheme, payment of 50% wages under 6.4.2 of NCWA-V
to the worker suffering from Leprosy, payment under Benevolent fund, idle wages from Feb. 93
to 1.8.95, attendance Bonus for 16 quarters and annual Bonus (exgratia) to the wife of Late
Nidarwa Bhuia is justified and legal? If not, to what relief the wife of the deceased workman is
entitled?”
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed and both the parties appeared for certain dates but
subsequently workman/union left appearing before the Tribunal. Thereafter again regd. notice were sent to
both the parties. However the management has appeared in this case, the concerned workman has not appeared
subsequently management left appearing before the Tribunal. Now the Case is pending since 18/09/2000 and
workman/union is not appearing before Tribunal. so, it is felt that workman/union has lost its interest in this
matter. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 9 uoEcj] 2020
-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 52@2000½ dks
izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 04-11-2020 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-20012@414@1999-vkbZvkj ¼lh,e-I½]
jktsUnz flag] MsLd vf/kdkjh@vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 9th November, 2020
S.O. 1012.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
No.1, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 52 of 2000) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2857
in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central
Government on 04.11.2020.
[No. L-20012/414/1999-IR(CM-I)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Desk Officer/Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947
Reference: No. 52/2000
Employer in relation to the management of Bhowra (N) Colliery of M/s. BCCL
AND
Their workman
Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers : None.
For the workman. : Sri S.C. Gour, Representative
State : Jharkhand.
Industry:- Coal
Dated : 30.09.2020
AWARD
By Order No.L-20012/414/1999-(C-I) dated 21/01/2000 the Central Government in the Ministry of
Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“क् ा बी.सी.सी.एल, भवरा (नॉ ि) कोजल॰ के प्रबंितंत्र द्वारा श्री सीताराम मितो एवं श्री नेृाल बौरी को ृीस रेट से
टाइम रेट मे जन ािमतीकरण ृर वेतन जनिािठरत करते सम उनके स्ट्ृेिल ृीस रेट भत्ते को न िोड़ा िाना उजचत एवं
न् ा संगत िज? दि निीं तो कमिकार दकस राित के ृात्र िज?”
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed and both the parties appeared. In course of hearing of
the case, the Vice President of Sponsoring Union Sri S.C. Gour has informed that workman/union is not
interested in contesting the case. It is felt that the workman has lost its interest in this matter. Hence “No
dispute” award is passed. communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 9 uoEcj] 2020
-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 14@2019½ dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 04-11-2020 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-20012@04@2019-vkbZvkj ¼lh,e-I½]
jktsUnz flag] MsLd vf/kdkjh@vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
2858 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 9th November, 2020
S.O. 1013.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
No.1, Dhanbad (Ref. No.14 of 2019) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central
Government on 04.11.2020.
[No. L-20012/04/2019-IR(CM-I)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Desk Officer/Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947
Reference: No. 14/2019
Employer in relation to the management of Kusunda Area of M/s. BCCL
AND
Their workman
Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer.
Appearances:
For the Employers : None
For the workman. : None
State : Jharkhand.
Industry:- Coal
Dated :29.09.2020
AWARD
By Order No.L-20012/04/2019 (IR(CM-I)) dated 21/02/2019 the Central Government in the Ministry
of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“i) Whether the action of the Management of Kusunda Area of M/s BCCL in denying wages to
Sri Shyam Kishore Yadav, Assistant Foreman for a period from 01.11.2013 to 28.12.2013 is
proper, legal and justified?
ii)
If not, what relief he is entitled to? And what other directions are necessary in this
regard?”
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed but the workman/union didn’t appear before the
Tribunal. However the management has appeared in this case, but subsequently both of them left appearing
before the Tribunal. Now the Case is pending since 19/03/2019 and workman/union is not appearing before
Tribunal. so, it is felt that workman/union has lost its interest in this matter. Hence No Dispute Award is passed.
Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 9 uoEcj] 2020
-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;
iatkc us”kuy cSad ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdkas vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k] iVuk ¼fcgkj½ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 04¼lh½@2016½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj
dks 09-11-2020 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-20012@76@2015-vkbZvkj ¼ch-II½]
lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2859
New Delhi, the 9th November, 2020
S.O. 1014.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 04 ( C)/2016) of the Industrial Tribunal, Patna (Bihar) as
shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Punjab National Bank, and their
workmen, received by the Central Government on 09.11.2020.
[No. L-20012/76/2015-IR(B-II)]
SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, TRIBUNAL, PATNA
Reference Case No. 04 (C) of 2016
Between the management of Circle Head, Punjab National Bank, Circle Office, Chanakya Place, ‘R’
Block, Patna (Bihar) And Their workman Sri Kishore Kumar, S/O- Sri Ashok Das, Chhoti Ambedkar Nagar,
Bakhtiyarpur, Patna (Bihar)-803212.
For the management :
Sri R. R. Jha, Sr. Manager, PNB, Circle Office, Patna.
For the Workman :
Sri B. Prasad, President, Bank Employees Federation, Bihar.
Present: Vishweshwar Nath Mishra, Presiding Officer,
Industrial Tribunal, Patna.
AWARD
Patna, dated- 22nd September, 2020
By the adjudication order no.-L-12012/76/2015-IR(B-II) dated- 12.02.2016 the Govt. of India, Ministry
of Labour, New Delhi has referred under clause (d) of sub-section-(1) and sub-section-(2A) of section-10 of the
Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, (hereinafter to be referred to as “ the Act”), the following dispute between the
management of Circle Head, Punjab National Bank, Circle Office, Chanakya Place, ‘R’ Block, Patna (Bihar)
And Their workman Sri Kishore Kumar, S/O- Sri Ashok Das, Chhoti Ambedkar Nagar, Bakhtiyarpur, Patna
(Bihar)-803212 for adjudication to this tribunal:-
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Punjab National Bank to terminate the service of workman
Sri Kishore Kumar was correct and valid when he demanded for increasing his monthly wages? It not,
what relief the workman is entitled to?”
2.
Before this reference case one I.D. Case No.:- 14(C) of 2015 was pending before this tribunal between
the same parties with the same relief as has been prayed in this reference case. Later on the workman withdrew
the I.D. Case in view of recent judgement of the Hon’ble Patna High Court and on prayer of the workman order
was passed accordingly in the light of the petition filed by the workman.
3.
Further with the consent of both the parties the deposition recorded in the I.D. Case and the documents
which were marked Exts. and statement of claim, written statement and rejoinder to written statement of the
both parties were adopted in this reference case vide order dated- 07.03.2019.
4.
The case of the workman Sri Kishore Kumar is that Punjab National Bank opend a branch at
Athmalgola, Dist.- Patna on 24.02.2014. The workman was orally appointed to discharge the duties of a Part
Time Sweeper at the Athmalgola branch on the same date i.e 24.02.2014. The workman used to discharge the
duties such as opening of Bank’s gate, cleaning, sweeping the branch premises; taking out registers, books from
the almirah, placing the same on tables and vice-versa;, cleaning tables, chairs, counters etc; , posting of mails,
serving water to the members of staff and customers of the bank, other sundry works of a part –time sweeper,
peon etc;. The workman used to receive his wages in his own name and also in the name of other persons. The
workman used to receive payment in different names for threat of losing his job. The work performed by the
workman were perennial in nature and not seasonal. The workman worked in the bank uninterruptedly from
24.02.2014 to 06.04.2015. When the workman as usual went for duties on 07.04.2015, he was stopped from
working and was informed that his services were terminated. The management after termination of the workman
Kishore Kumar appointed fresh Part Time Sweeper at Athmalgola branch and other branches of the bank. The
2860 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
workman was neither given any notice, notice pay, nor any retrenchment compensation before his termination
and as such mandatory provision of section 25-F of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 were violated. The
management violated the provisions of Bipartite Settlement and provisions of section 77 & 78 of the Industrial
Dispute ( Central ) Rules,1957. The workman prayed for his reinstatement with full back wages in the services
of the bank as a part time sweeper on 1/3rd pay scale of a full time subordinate staff and he also prayed for
regularization of his services as a part time sweeper / peon.
5.
The case of the management is that there was no employer – employee relationship between the bank
and Sri Kishore Kumar and accordingly dispute raised by the workman Sri Kishore Kumar does not constitute
an Industrial dispute. The service conditions of the workmen / staff in the banking industry are governed by the
provisions of Sastry Award, Desai Award and various Bipartitle Settlement. The persons who are engaged to do
casual work are excluded from the operation of the Award. Kishore Kumar was never appointed by the bank.
He rendered his services of different nature totally based on the requirement of the bank and his availability.
Kishore Kumar has been called on by the bank from time to time for cleaning of the bank premises or for
serving water to the staff and customers of the bank. Kishore Kumar volunteered his service as per the need of
the bank and the bank used to pay for the services extended by him. The further case of the management is that
at the time of his engagement Kishore Kumar mentioned that he was only 8th pass but later on when applications
were invited for the post of Part Time Sweeper he mentioned his qualification as intermediate pass. There is a
suppression of material facts from the bank authority. Kishore Kumar was called by the bank from time to time
and he was paid necessary payments by the bank for the work done by him. Any such work done by him does
not create his right for appointment / regularization in the bank services. The further case of the management is
that the job of Kishore Kumar was ad-hoc in nature depending upon the requirement of the bank. Since there
was no employer - employee relationship therefore the question of termination does not arises at all. He was
given opportunity to apply for the post of Part Time Sweeper in the bank but as he did not fulfill the eligibility
criteria therefore his candidature was cancelled. Other persons who fulfilled to eligibility criteria were appointed
for permanent post. The further case of the management is that Kishore Kumar was not an employee of the bank
and he was just a casual worker. The service conditions of the workman / employees in the Banking Industry are
governed by Sastry Award, Desai Award and various Bipartite settlements. The recruitment in the bank in the
subordinate cadre is done through the medium of employment exchange, after going through the selection
process to those candidates who fulfill the eligibility criteria as per bank’s rules. Hence, no right exists for any
person to claim regularization / absorption in bank de hors the bank’s rules / guidelines. The rule of equality in
public employment is a basic feature of the constitution. Unless the appointment is in terms of the relevant rules
and after a proper competition among eligible persons, the same would not confer any right for permanent
employment in bank. According to the management Kishore Kumar is not entitled for any relief sought by him
and the action taken by the management is just and proper.
6.
The workman after filing of the written statement of the management also filed rejoinder to the same
stating therein the same facts and plea already taken in the statement of claim. According to the workman
Kishore Kumar while working with the bank for a pretty long period attained the status of a workman. The
status of Kishore Kumar was that of a temporary part time sweeper workman awaiting his regularization /
permanent absorption / confirmation in the services of the bank under 1/3rd pay scale of a full time subordinate
staff. The name of Kishore Kumar was also empanelled by the management for absorption of his services in the
bank. Kishore Kumar had attained the status of a temporary workman and as per the spirit of Sastri Award and
Bipartitle Settlement the services of the workman should have been confirmed as a part time sweeper under 1/3rd
wages of a full time subordinate staff. The action of the management in terminating services of the workman is
neither legal not justified and the workman is entitled to be reinstated and regularization in the services of the
bank.
7.
Both the parties examined only one witness each in support of their case.
8.
W.W-1 Kishore Kumar the workman himself appeared before this tribunal in support of his case. He in
deposition stated that he used to work as a part time sweeper in Athmalgola branch of Punjab National Bank. He
also used to perform the duties of a peon in the branch. He used to work in the branch from 9.00 A.M to 6.00
P.M. He used to perform various duties including opening the gate of the branch, sweeping of the bank
premises, taking out register from the Almirah and placing the same on tables, taking out cash box from the
strong room and keeping the same at proper place etc. He used to get Rs. 791/- as weekly wages. He was paid
by voucher. His wages were also paid besides in his own name in the name of some other person namely
Rajesh, Rakesh, Rahul, Ranjeet, Sohan, Mohan etc. He worked in the branch from 24.02.2014 to 06.04.2015.
During this period no other person used to work in the branch. He used to perform the duties like that of a
permanent sweeper or peon till 06.04.2015 when he was removed from his work. While he was working in the
branch one another person was appointed in the bank as a part time sweeper / or peon and after that he was
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2861
terminated. No notice, notice pay or compensation was paid to him before terminating him. He has stated that he
belongs to schedule caste and he should be reinstated in the branch with full back wages.
In cross-examination he has stated that he has studied upto intermediate and he used to receive
payment putting his own signature as well as the signature of Rahul, Ranjeet, Rakesh, Amar, Sohan, Mohan etc.
9.
Management has also examined only one witness on behalf of the management witness namely M.W-1
Kumar Badrinath appeared in this tribunal and deposed in the case. He in his deposition has stated that he knows
Kishore Kumar who used to come in the branch for sweeping purposes and he was duly paid on the same day.
He has further stated that he advised him to file an application for appointment on the post of part time sweeper,
while the appointment process for the post of part time sweeper was going on. Kishore Kumar applied showing
his qualification as 8th pass, but at the time of interview it was disclosed that he was under graduate and
therefore he was not selected for the post. His claim in this case is wrong.
In cross- examination of M.W-1 he has stated that Athmalgola branch of the bank started functioning in
2014. There was not any peon or part time sweeper of permanent nature from 24.02.2014 to 06.04.2015 in the
branch. He has further stated that educational qualification for a 4th grade employee is intermediate. The branch
manager used to pay the workman through voucher by taking his signature on the voucher. This witness has
denied the facts that workman of this case Kishore Kumar was paid by vouchers in the name of some other
persons. He has further stated that he cann’t bring in this tribunal those persons whose signatures appear on the
vouchers. He has further stated that he cann’t say as to how much period Kumar worked in the branch. He has
further stated that the status of Kishore Kumar was not of a part time sweeper rather he was a daily wager. He
has further stated that he only forwarded the application of Kishore Kumar and he did not forwarded application
of any other person. He proved all the vouchers upon which signature of Kishore Kumar as part time sweeper
was present. He also identified his own signature on the voucher and the same has been marked as Ext.-W. In
this case all the documents have been filed on behalf of the workman only. The management has not got
exhibited any documents in support of his case.
The following documents have been brough on record by the workman Kishore Kumar.
Ext.- W & W/1- are the vouchers by which Kishore Kumar and other persons wee paid their wages.
Ext.-W/2-
the copy of letter dated- 27.09.2014 issued by Chief Manager, HRD Deptt., Circle Office,
‘R’ Block, Patna to all incumbents in charge to furnish information in respect of the persons
working on stop gap arrangement.
Ext.-W/3-
Letter dated- 17.10.2014 by Manager, BO Athmalgola given to Chief Manager, HRD
Section, CO Patna relating to person working on stop gap arrangement HRD dt-27.09.2014.
Ext.-W/4-
Letter dt- 01.04.2015 issued by Chief Manager HRD Deptt. Circle Office, ‘R’ Block, Patna
regarding interview for recruitment as peon in subordinate cadre given to the workman
Sri Kishore Kumar.
Ext.-W/5-
Application for appointment dt- 18.01.2019 written by Sri Kishore Kumar given to the Chief
Manager, Punjab National Bank, Circle Office, ‘R’ Block, Patna.
Ext.-W/6-
Photo copy of Matriculation Certificate.
Ext.-W/7-
Photo copy of Intermediate Pass Marks Sheet.
Ext.-W/8-
Photo copy of Matriculation marks sheet.
Ext.-W/9-
Photo copy of Caste Certificate of the workman.
Ext.-W/10-
Photo copy of registration of employment exchange card.
Ext.-W/11-
Photo copy of Voter Identity Card.
Ext.-W/12-
Photo copy of PAN Card.
Ext.-W/13-
Photo copy of letter dt- 12.05.2017 regarding verification of document in respect of
recruitment of peon in subordinate cadre written by Sr. Manager, Punjab National Bank, HRD
Deptt. Circle Office, ‘R’ Block, Patna given to workman Sri Kishore Kumar.
Ext.-W/14-
Photo copy of letter dt- 24.05.2017 issued by Bankaddressed to Thana incharge, Bakhtiyarpur,
P.S requesting to submit report relating to character of Kishore Kumar before consideration of
his appointment as a peon.
Ext.-W/15-
Photo copy of letter dt- 18.06.2017 written by Police Officer to the Chief Manager, Punjab
National Bank, Circle Office, ‘R’ Block Chanakiya Tower, Patna regarding the character
verification of Kishore Kumar.
2862 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
10.
The learned representative of the workman submitted that in this case the workman has been able to
successfully prove his case for reinstatement. He submitted that the workman Kishore Kumar served the branch
of the bank from the date of its opening i.e- 24.02.2014 till the date of his termination i.e- 06.04.2015. The
workman discharged the duties of peon / sweeper as has been mentioned in the statement of claim from 9.00
A.M to 6.00P.M continuously without any break. The duties of the workman were perennial in nature and he
was paid wages weekly @ 791/81. The case of the workman is that all of a sudden he was stopped working
from 07.04.2015 without any notice and he was also not paid any amount of compensation, which is violation of
section-25F of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. The document which has been exhibited on behalf of the
workman fully support his case.
11.
The learned representative of the workman further referred some of the judgements of the Hon’ble
Apex Court as well as Hon’ble Patna High Court in support of his case. He relied upon-
1994 (42) BLJR page-1300, the case of Mithilelsh Kumar Singh Vs State of Bihar & Ors. But this
judgement is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case. It is the case of termination of service of
a workman who was appointed in a regular time scale of pay on temporary and adhoc basis which is not the case
of this very workman. Who was engage by the then branch manager as stop-gap-arrangement.
The representative of the workman further relied upon the case of one Harjinder Singh Vs Punjab State
Warehousing Corp. reported in 2010 (1) SCR page- 591. This case relates to the reinstatement of a terminated
employee who was appointed in a fixed pay scale and there was violation of rule of last-come-first go as junior
to the workman were retained in service, which is not the case here before this tribunal and as such this case is
also not applicable.
The learned representative of the workman further referred the case of Tamilnadu Terminated Full
Time Temporary LIC Employees Association VS Life Insurance Corporation of India & Ors reported in
(2015)19 SCC 62. This was a case regarding the absorption as regular and permanent service employees in their
respective posts of the LIC. In that very case employees were working as temporary / Badli and part time and
they were appointed by the management on daily wages basis against the leave vacancies of its employees in
class III & IV posts, which is not the case of the employee which is before this tribunal and hence this case is
also not applicable.
The representative of the workman further referred one judgement of the Supreme Court in the case of
Devinder Singh Vs Municipal Council, Sanaur which was delivered on 11.04.2011 in Civil Appeal No.- 3190 of
2011, which was a case of termination of service and reinstatement.
In that very case the workman who was engaged on contract basis was terminated without holding any
enquiry and without given any notice and compensation and persons junior to him were retrained in service, it is
not the case before this tribunal. As such this ruling is also not applicable in the facts and circumstance of the
present case. The leaned representative of the workman further relied upon one judgement of the Supreme Court
delivered in the case of Umrala Gram Panchayat Vs The Sec. Municipal Employee Union in Civil Appeal Nos.-
3209 – 3210 of 2015 on 27th March,2015. It was case of equal pay for equal work. The grievances of the
workmen were that they were being monetarily exploited as they were not paid the benefits and allowances etc
as are being paid to other permanent safai kamdars. This judgement is also not applicable in the facts and
circumstances of the present case pending before this tribunal.
12.
The learned representative of the management submitted that there was no employer employee
relationship between the bank and Kishore Kumar and accordingly so called dispute raised by Kishore Kumar
does not constitute an Industrial Dispute. It was further submitted that Kishore Kumar was never appointed by
the bank rather he rendered his services of different nature totally based on the requirement of the bank and his
availability. He was called from time to time for cleaning the bank premises and serving water to the customers
of the bank and staff. He was made necessary payment by the bank for work done by him. Any such work done
of him does not create his right for appointment / regularization in the services of the bank. Job of Kishore
Kumar was adhoc in nature depending upon the requirement of the bank. He was given opportunity to apply for
the post of PTS but as he did not fulfill the eligibility criteria therefore his candidature was cancelled. Kishore
Kumar was denied job in the bank only because he was intermediate pass and the qualification for the post of
PTS is matric fail. As such the workman is not entitle for any relief sought for by him. The learned
representative of the management relied upon two orders of the Hon’ble Apex Court. The copy of the orders
which have been filed in this tribunal do not bear the case number in which the said orders were passed by the
Hon’ble Apex Court, therefore, the aforesaid orders can not be considered.
13.
After hearing the learned representative of both the parties and going through the materials as well as
the documents which have been brought on the record, I am of the view that the workman Kishore Kumar is
entitled for some relief in this case. This workman was serving the branch of the bank from the date of its
opening till the date of his termination continuously. The payment vouchers also supports this facts, although
some vouchers are in the name of some other persons. The case of the workman is that no other person was
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2863
either temporarily or part time or permanently employed in the branch for cleaning the same and it was the
workman himself who ask cleaning the branch and doing other works of a peon in the branch. M.W-1 Kumar
Badri Nath who was the branch manager at relevant time of Athmalgola branch has admitted this fact in the
para-5 of the cross-examination of his deposition that from 24.02.2014 to 06.04.2015 there was no permanent or
PTS or peon in the branch. He has also admitted in para-7 of his deposition that payment was made by vouchers
and the person who used to work was paid by the vouchers by taking his signature. The case of the workman is
that some vouchers are in the name of other persons though no other person worked and he himself worked and
he was forced to make signature of other persons and for the fear of losing his job he put the signature of other
persons on the vouchers. From perusal of signature on the voucher it appears that all the signatures were made
by one and the same person and this fact is further corroborated by the voucher at page-41 which shows that
earlier Kishore Kumar put his signature but after cutting the same the signature of Ranjeet Kumar is appearing
on the voucher. No other person has come forward to put his claim that he ever worked any day in Athmalgola
branch and the management also failed to bring the persons in whose name the vouchers exist. The handwriting
of the signatures which are appearing on the voucher appears to be of the same person and when no other person
come forward to put his claim and the management also does not bring such persons whose signature are
appearing in the voucher, it means that it was only Kishore Kumar was working in Athmalgola branch and not
any other person.
14.
Later on when the management started process for the regular appointment of the persons who were
working on stop gap arrangement in different branches of the bank, the name of only Kishore Kumar was
recommended by the branch manager vide Ext.-W/3 with the positive recommendation that the boy is working
very good in his allotted job and he is very sincere and responsible. On 18.01.2015 the workman Kishore Kumar
submitted his application form (Ext.-W/5) for appointment to the Circle Office Patna. The interview letter (Ext.-
W/4 dated- 01.04.2015 ) was issued to this workman to appear for interview on 10.04.2015 but before he could
face and appear for interview his services were terminated on 07.04.2015. By Ext.-W/13 the workman was
called for documents verification and he was directed to be present at Circle Office on 22.05.2017. After
documents verification on 22.05.2017, a registered letter dated- 24.05.2017 (Ext.-W/14) was given by Circle
Office, Patna to officer incharge, Bakhtiyarpur police station for anticidents and character verification of
Kishore Kumar. In that letter it was mentioned that the workman Kishore Kumar has appeared before the
interview board for employment of peon in the bank and after receipt of the police report matter for his
appointment and giving job will be considered. The requireed police report was submitted by the Bakhtiyarpur
police station vide Ext.-W/15 in which it was clearly mentioned that there was no complaint against this very
this workman Kishore Kumar in the police station and during enquiry it was found that the workman is a man
of very good character.
It is very much surprising that after considering / verification of the entire documents, the workman
was called for the interview and it also appears that after successful interview a police report was called for from
the concerned police station regarding his character which was also favourable but even then workman was not
considered for appointment only on the ground that workman is intermediate although M.W-1 in his para-6 of
his deposition admitted that the educational qualification for appointment of a IVth grade employee is
intermediate. It is surprising that even after fulfilling the criteria for appointment of a IVth grade employee the
workman was denied employment in the bank by the management.
15.
From the documents available on the record it is evident that the worked worked more than 240 days in
a calendar year preceding his date of termination. It is evident that the workman was continuously working in
the branch from 24.02.2014 to 06.04.2015 and he was terminated on 07.04.2015 and before his termination the
requirements of section 25F of the Industrial Dispute Act,1947 were also not complied with by the management.
As such the termination of the workman Kishore Kumar is not correct and valid and is illegal in the eye of law.
In view of the discussions made above, I am of the view that termination of services of the workman
Sri Kishore Kumar is not correct and valid and he is entitled for reinstatement in service.
Accordingly the workman Kishore Kumar is hereby reinstated in service with 50% back wages. This
award is effected after date of publication in gazette.
And accordingly this is my award.
Dictated & Corrected by me.
VISHWESHWAR NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer
2864 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 9 uoEcj] 2020
-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;
ljdkj cSad vkQ cMkSnk ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] bZjukdqye] dksphu ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 20@2013½dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 09-11-2020 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-12012@88@2012-vkbZvkj ¼ch-II½]
lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 9th November, 2020
S.O. 1015 .—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 20/2013) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, ERNAKULAM, Cochin as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of
Bank of Baroda, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 09.11.2020.
[No. L-12012/88/2012-IR(B-II)]
SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL–CUM-LABOUR COURT,
ERNAKULUM
Present: Shri. V. Vijaya Kumar, B. Sc, LLM, Presiding Officer
(Monday the 24th day of February 2020, 5Phalguna1941)
ID No. 20/2013
Workman
:
Smt.V. K. Nirmala
Nakkilikattu House
Allapra P.O.
Perumbavoor P.O.
Ernakulam - 683533
By Adv. Ashok B. Shenoy
Management
:
The Assistant General Manager
Bank of Baroda
Regional Office, Vasudeva Building
T. D. Road
Ernakulam –682
By M/s. B. S. Krishnan Associates
This case coming up for final hearing on 09.01.2020 and this Tribunal-cum-Labour Court on 24.02.2020
passed the following:
AWARD
1.
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section
10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act 14 of 1947) the Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order
No. L-12012/88/2012-IR(B-II) dated 05.03.2013 referred the following dispute for adjudication by this
Tribunal.
2.
The dispute referred is;
“Whether the action of the management of Bank of Baroda in terminating the services of Ms.V. K.
Nirmala from the post of temporary/part time sweeper from Perumbavoor Branch is illegal ? What
benefit she is eligible to get ? ’’
3.
The worker was employed in the subordinate cadre as sweeper in the services of the Perumbavoor
branch of the management Bank. She was employed in the service of the Perumbavoor branch from 20.07.2009.
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2865
She had been employed continuously and regularly against a regular and permanent vacancy to do regular and
permanent nature of duties of sweeper. She had been discharging all the duties entrusted to her diligently,
honestly and without any complaints from any quarters. On 07.01.2012 the worker’s services were orally
terminated by the Manager of the Perumbavoor branch of the management Bank. Aggrieved by the oral
termination of the services, the worker raised an industrial dispute against the management challenging the
termination of her service before the Assistant Labour Commissioner(C), Ernakulam. In view of the adamant
stand taken by the management, the conciliation efforts by Assistant Labour Commissioner(C) failed. The
termination of the services of the worker by the management amounts to retrenchment. The worker continued
to work with the management continuously from 20.07.2009 to 07.01.2012. However the management has
neither issued notice of retrenchment to the worker nor paid the worker wages in lieu of such notice as
mandated by Sec 25F of ID Act, 1947. The management has not paid the retrenchment compensation as
required under Sec 25F of ID Act, 1947. Retrenchment of worker’s service is therefore illegal, unjust and also
null and void in law. The retrenchment of the worker is also in violation of Para 522, 523 & 524 of Sastri
Award. Employees much junior in service to the worker herein are retained in service by the management. This
is in violation of mandatory provision in Sec 25G of ID Act, 1947 and Para 507 of Sastri Award. It was also
pointed out that fresh and new hands have been employed by the management in their service against the very
same work and jobs for which the worker was employed. This is in violation of Sec 25H of ID Act, 1947,
Clause 20.12 of 1st Bipartite Settlement dt.19.10.1966 and Para 493 of Sastri Award. The worker was treated by
the management as a temporary worker against permanent vacancy just to deprive her of the status and privilege
of a permanent worker. The management is in the habit of engaging employees on temporary basis against
permanent vacancies one after another and retrenched them to be replaced by new hands in the same way. Such
practice of the management amounts to unfair labour practice prohibited U/s 25T of ID Act, 1947 and violates
Para 20.7 and 20.8 of 1st Bipartite Settlement and also Para 495 and 522 of Sastri Award. In terms of Clause
20.12 of 1st Bipartite settlement dt.19.10.1966, the management is bound to retain and absorb the worker in
regular service especially when the vacancy against which she was employed is permanent and continues to
exist. Since retrenchment from service of management Bank, the worker is without any job and income.
4.
The management filed written statement denying the above allegations. The management is a
nationalized public sector Bank. There are prescribed rules, procedures, policies and norms in the matter of
recruitment into its regular services. For appoint of subordinate staff cadre, recruitment is made through
notification to Employment Exchange and after complying with the formalities of test and interview. The
instructions and guidelines of Govt of India and Reserve Bank of India in the matter of reservation are also
strictly followed in the matter of recruitment. Competent authority for sanction of regular post in the
subordinate staff cadre in the management Bank is General Manager (HRM) and the appointing authority is
Regional Head. The Branch Manager is neither the sanctioning authority nor the appointing authority. The
worker was not appointed in the management Bank by any competent authority. She was not engaged against
any regular vacancy in the branch. She was not appointed as an employee of the Bank and there was no
employer employee relationship between the worker and the management Bank. The worker was intermittently
engaged as daily wager on casual/temporary basis at Perumbavoor branch of the management Bank during
20.07.2009 to 07.01.2012. She was being paid appropriate wages on the basis of her engagement. She was not
engaged 240 or more days at any point of time. The worker was not subject to any recruitment process and was
not given any appointment letter. The worker was engaged by the Branch Manager who is not the appointing
authority. Temporary employees engaged on a day to day basis have no right of employment in the
management Bank. The engagement of the worker was not through Employment Exchange and her engagement
was not in compliance with the prescribed procedures for the appointment. Management Bank is a public sector
organization and is a ‘state’ under Article 12 of the Constitution of India. The appointment in the management
Bank is governed by rules and guidelines issued by Govt of India from time to time. Appointment in the
subordinate staff cadre is to be made by the competent authority and against sanctioned vacancies and also
subject to fulfillment of eligibility criteria. In the normal course, appointment in subordinate cadre is done
through Employment Exchange. If suitable candidates are not available through Employment Exchange, other
source of recruitment are considered. The worker in this case was not sponsored by the Employment Exchange
and she was not subjected to any recruitment process. It is denied that the worker worked for more than 240
days in the preceding year and worker must be put to strict proof of the same. It is baseless and incorrect to
allege that the management violated Sections 25F, 25G, 25H of ID Act and provisions of Bipartite Settlement
and Sastri Award. The worker has no right to claim permanent engagement and is not entitled to get the status
and privilege of a permanent worker. Our Constitution envisages right of equality and equal opportunity in the
matter of public employment under Article 14 & 16 of the Constitution. There is no fundamental right in those
who have been employed on daily wages or on contractual basis to claim regularization and absorption in the
regular service.
2866 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
5.
The worker filed replication denying the above allegations in the written statement filed by the
management. The management, being a nationalized Bank, on opening of its branch at Perumbavoor on
20.07.2009 employed the worker against the permanent vacancy of sweeper cum peon. No permanent sweeper
was posted in the branch on 20.07.2009 till 07.01.2012. The worker was entrusted the duties of permanent
nature in the branch from the date of opening of the branch. The worker was entrusted with the duties of
sweeper cum peon and she had been working under the supervision of the branch authorities and had been
given access to all areas in the premises including the security area of the branch. She was regularly paid
wages against voucher slips duly authorised by the branch authorities and accounted against Bank’s Profit &
Loss account. She was also paid bonus for the period she was employed with the management Bank. There are
no rule, procedure, policies or norms in the matter of recruitment into the regular service of the management
Bank. The norms and guidelines if at all any, are discretionary and not mandatory in nature. There is no
mandate that the appointment or recruitment of subordinate staff can be made only through Employment
Exchange. No sweeper cum peon other than the worker was engaged by the branch authorities to attend the
permanent and regular duties in the branch. She was regularly and continuously attending the job and she was
being paid wages including for Sundays. At no point of time the worker was put on notice that she employed
against a post not sanctioned by the management. It can be seen that she was paid wages much higher than the
wages for 240 days in a year and she was also paid bonus. The management Bank is having 85 branches and 2
Administrate offices in Kerala and the permanent employees working in the subordinate cadre are only 90.
There were considerable number of temporary peons and sweepers entrusted duties of permanent nature. The
management Bank had regularized 37 temporary sub staff entrusted with duties of permanent nature during
2009-2011. After retrenchment from the service of the Bank on 07.01.2012, new temporary employees were
engaged by management Bank without affording an opportunity to the worker for re-employment. Sponsorship
of Employment Exchange is not a mandatory condition for employment in the post and job against which the
worker was employed in the management Bank.
6.
After completion of pleadings, the worker examined herself as WW1 and marked exhibits W1 & W2.
The worker also examined WW2. The learned Counsel for the worker sought to mark exhibits W3 to W10
through the witness. Counsel for the management opposed the request on the ground that the witness had no
connection with any of those documents sought to be marked in the proceedings. Since the witness had no
connection with the documents, the request of the learned Counsel for the worker was disallowed. The
management examined MW1 and marked Exbt.M1 through him. Exhibits M2 to M7 were marked by consent
of parties.
7.
On the basis of the reference and pleadings, the issues to be decided are;
1.
Whether the action of the management in terminating the service of the worker w.e.f. 07.01.2012
was in accordance with the provisions of Sec 25F of ID Act ?
2.
Whether the management violated any of the provisions of ID Act, Bipartite Settlement or Sastri
Award while terminating the services of the worker?
3.
Relief and cost ?
8.
Issue nos. 1 & 2
According to the worker, she was engaged by the management Bank on 20.07.2009 when the
Perumbavoor branch of the management Bank was opened. She was engaged as a sweeper-cum-peon and
continued to be employed till 07.01.2012 continuously and regularly against a regular and permanent vacancy
and was doing regular and permanent nature of duties of a sweeper-cum-peon. On 07.01.2012, the services of
the worker was orally terminated by the Branch Manager. According to the learned Counsel for the worker, the
oral termination of the worker amounts to retrenchment. However she was neither issued any notice of
retrenchment nor wages in lieu of notice mandated U/s 25F of ID Act, 1947. The retrenchment of the worker
from service is therefore illegal, unjust, null and void in law. It is also in violation of Paras 522, 523 & 524 of
Sastri Award. According to the learned Counsel for the management, the worker was never employed by the
management Bank. Her services were intermittently used by the Bank from 20.07.2009 to 07.01.2012 and she
was also paid wages for the services rendered by her. Her engagement was only temporary on a day to day basis
and the worker has no right of employment in the management Bank. The management Bank is a nationalized
Bank and therefore follows prescribed rules and procedures for appointment in its regular service. For
appointment in the subordinate staff cadre, recruitment is made through notification in the Employment
Exchange and after complying with the formalities of test and interview. The worker was not given any
appointment order and therefore, there was no retrenchment of the worker by the management. According to
the learned Counsel for the worker, the policies and procedures relied on by the management are for regular
recruitment and the worker has no claim for regularization. With regard to the policies also the worker through
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2867
WW2 established that the management resorted to regularization of temporary and casual subordinate staff on
the basis of settlement between the union and the management. The management relied on Exbt.M1 to point
out that HR resourcing policy covers the appointment of subordinate staff also. According to the learned
Counsel for the management, General Manager(HRM) is the competent authority to sanction the post of sub
staff in various zones. The learned Counsel for the worker pointed out that specific guidelines and criteria for
recruitment in subordinate staff cadre forms part of Exbt.M1 as Annexure 1 which is not enclosed along with
Exbt. M1. It is also seen that Para 7.0 of Exbt.M1 provides for engagement of staff on temporary basis. Such
temporary engagement also requires of the approval of the General Manager(HRM). It has come out through
the evidence of MW1 that during the relevant point of time there was no regular sweeper or peon in
Perumbavoor branch. It has also come out through his evidence that since there was no regular sweeper or
peon posted in the branch during the relevant point of time, all the work that are required to be done by the
sweeper and peon were getting done through the temporary employee. Even though he stated that there were
another sweeper-cum-peon working in the branch, he could not remember their names or address. He further
stated in his evidence that during his tenure as Branch Manager in Perumbavoor branch from 09.06.2010 to
09.10.2011, he was aware that the worker was working in the branch as a temporary sweeper cum peon. It was
also admitted by MW1 that the accounts of Perumbavoor branch was audited by the audit team during his tenure
in the branch and the auditor has not objected to the engagement of the worker and payments made to her. He
also admitted that no action was taken against him for engaging the worker and making payments to her. Hence
it is clear that the engagement of the worker had the required approval and the payments made to her were fully
authorized.
9.
From the above discussion, it is very clear that the worker was engaged by the management Bank
from 20.07.2009 to 07.01.2012 as sweeper-cum-peon. Having found that the worker was engaged by the
management Bank, the further issue to be decided is whether her oral termination w.e.f. 07.01.2012 is in
violation of industrial dispute provisions of Sec 25F of ID Act, 1947 and Para 522, 523 & 524 of Sastri Award.
The worker filed an Interlocutory Application seeking production of certain documents to substantiate her claim
that she worked in the management Bank continuously for more than 240 days, one year immediately prior to
her retrenchment. The worker requested for production of the following documents.
1.
Statement of account No. 32850100000138 maintained at Perumbavoor branch of the
management Bank in the name of the worker for the period from 20.07.2009 to 31.12.2012
2.
Ledger account statement of Sundry charges-others-A/c No. 32850054511004 maintained at
Perumbavoor branch of the management Bank for the period from 20.07.2009 to 07.01.2012.
3.
Debit vouchers relating to wages paid to temporary sub staff employees to the debit A/c
No. 32850054511004 maintained at Perumbavoor branch of the management Bank for the period
from 20.07.2009 to 07.01.2012.
4.
Form-C Bonus paid statement/Register under Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 submitted to the
Controlling Authority of Perumbavoor branch of the management Bank for the financial years
ended 31.03.2010, 31.03.2011, 31.03.2012
5.
Statement of office account – Bonus paid account No. 32850052431001 maintained at
Perumbavoor branch of the management Bank for the period from 20.07.2009 to 31.12.2012.
6.
Debit vouchers relating to Bonus paid to employees to the debit of account No. 32850052431001
for the financial years 01.04.2009 to 31.03.2010, 01.04.2010 to 31.03.2011 and 01.04.2011 to
31.03.2012
7.
Temporary employees wages calculation register maintained by Perumbavoor branch of the
management Bank for the period 20.07.2009 to 07.01.2012
8.
Letter no.BOB/PERAMBA/01 dt.12.08.2009 sent by Perumbavoor branch of the management
Bank to Regional Office of the Bank at Ernakulam
9.
Copy of E-mail circular dt.19.02.2013 issued by HRM Department of management Bank, to all
branches in Kerala Region, directing payment to all subordinate staff employees, pro-rate wages
at the first stage of basic pay and all allowances thereon, as applicable to permanent subordinate
staff employees
10.
Copy of PERAMBA/03/2011 dt.23.11.2011 addressed to the management by its Perumbavoor
branch
2868 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
IA No.34/2014 filed for this purpose was allowed by this Court and the management was directed to
produce the documents called for by the worker.
The management produced the following documents
1.
True copy of the statement of account No.32850100000138 maintained at Perumbavoor branch
from 09.09.2009 to 31.12.2012
2.
True copy of the Ledger account statement of Sundry charges account No. 32850054511004 of
Perumbavoor branch from 13.07.2009 to 31.12.2012
3.
True copy of available Debit vouchers relating to wages paid to temporary employees account
No. 32850054511004 from 27.07.2009 to 07.01.2012
4.
True copy of the statement of Bonus account No.32850052431001 maintained at Perumbavoor
branch from 13.07.2009 to 31.12.2012
5.
True copy of available Debit vouchers relating to Bonus paid to temporary employees to the
debit account No.32850052431001 for the financial year 01.04.2009 to31.03.2012
6.
True copy of the Peon delivery book from 05.08.2009 to 14.01.2010
According to the learned Counsel for the worker, Exbt.M3 and M4 series, Form-C bonus paid
statement/register under Payment of Bonus Act submitted to the Controlling Authority by the Perumbavoor
branch of the management Bank for the financial years 31.03.2010, 31.03.2011, 31.03.2012 are very crucial in
establishing that the worker worked for more than 240 days, one year immediately prior to her oral termination.
Form-C return of bonus paid will indicate the number of days the worker worked in the bank. Though the
worker requested for production of Form-C bonus paid statements for 2009-2012, the management failed to
produce any of the statements and the management failed to explain the reasons for non production of the same.
However the management produced all the debit vouchers from 08.01.2011 to 07.01.2012 and also the Ledger
account statement of Sundry charges for the corresponding period. From the above documents it can be clearly
established that the management paid a salary of Rs.31,654/- from 08.01.2011 to 07.01.2012 and the average
daily wages paid to the worker was Rs.95/- per day. Hence it can be seen that the worker worked for more than
300 days one year immediately prior to her retrenchment. The learned Counsel for the worker submitted that an
adverse presumption will have to drawn against the management for non production of other crucial documents
such as Form-C Bonus paid statement. The learned Counsel relied on the decision of Gauri Shankar Vs State
of Rajasthan, 2015 12 SCC 754. In the above case, the workman was working with the respondent and his
case was that he was appointed against a permanent and sanctioned post w.e.f. 01.01.1987 till his services came
to be retrenched and he had rendered service of more than 240 days in every calendar year and has received
salary from the respondent department each month. The workman challenged the retrenchment as bad in law as
the same is in violation of Sec 25F, 25G, 25H, 25T and 25U of the ID Act. The workman applied for
production of the Muster Roll and the management failed to produce the relevant Muster Rolls. The Hon’ble
Supreme Court relying on its earlier decisions in Gopal Krishna G Ketker Vs Muhammed Haji Latheef,
AIR 1968 SC 1413 and Murukesam Pillai Vs Manikyavasaka Pandara, 1917 5 LW 759 held that even if the
burden of proof does lie on a party, the Court can draw an adverse inference if he withholds important
documents in his possession which can throw light on the facts of issue. The learned Counsel for the workman
also relied on the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sriram Industrial Enterprises Ltd Vs Mahak
Singh and others, 2007 4 SCC 94, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that when the workman
discharged their initial onus by producing the documents in their possession it is the responsibility of the
management to disprove the claim of the workman that he did not work for more than 240 days with the
management one year immediately prior to his/her termination. In this case, as already stated, Exbt.M4 series of
Debit vouchers and Exbt.M3 true copies of the Ledger account of Sundry charges will clearly establish that the
worker worked for more than 300 days one year immediately prior to her retrenchment. Hence the non
production of Form-C bonus paid statement will not affect the conclusion that the worker worked for more than
240 days during one year immediately before her termination. Hence the management is liable to follow the
conditions precedent before the retrenchment of the worker as contemplated U/s 25 F of ID Act, 1947.
10.
The learned Counsel for the management argued that the worker in this case is only a casual employee
on daily wages and hence she is not entitled to claim the benefits U/s 25F of the ID Act. The learned Counsel for
the worker relied on the decision of Hon’ble High Court of Kerala in Sreekumar K. Vs Managing Director,
KTDC Ltd, 2019 (1) KHC 225 to point out that the definition in Sec 2(s) of the ID Act includes casual
employees also. In the above case the Hon’ble High Court held that;
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2869
“ Para 18. From this it is quiet evident that the definition of the term ‘workman’ U/s 2(s) of the ID Act includes
a casual employee as well and hence the decision cited (Supra) (in the context governed by the provisions of the
workman’s Compensation Act) is not at all attracted to the case in hand.”
11.
The learned Counsel for the management relied on the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in
State of Karnataka Vs Uma Devi, 2006 4 SCC 1 and the State of Bihar and others Vs Devendra Sharma,
Civil Appeal no. 7879/2019, to argue that the management Bank being a ‘state‘ under Article 12 of the
Constitution, no back door entry in service can be allowed violating Article 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India.
The learned Counsel for the worker on the other hand relied on various decisions and argued that when there is a
violation of the provisions of ID Act, the dictum laid down in the above decisions is clearly distinguishable. In
Ajaypal Singh Vs Haryana Warehousing Corporation, (2015) 6 Supreme Court Cases 321 the
Hon’ble Supreme Court considered the decision in Uma Devi’s case (Supra) and held that ;
“17. In Uma Devi’s case, (3) this Court held that adherence to the rule of equality in public
employment is a basic feature of our Constitution and since rule of law is a core of our Constitution, a Court
would certainly be disabled from passing an order upholding a violation of Article 14 or in ordering the
overlooking of the need to comply with the requirements of Article 14 read with Article 16 of the Constitution
of India. The provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act and powers of the Industrial and Labour Court provided
therein were not at all under consideration in Uma Devi’s case (3). The issue pertaining to unfair labour practice
was neither the subject matter for decision nor was decided in Uma Devi’s case.
18. We have noticed that Industrial Dispute Act is made for the settlement of industrial disputes and certain
other purposes as mentioned therein. It prohibits unfair labour practice on the part of the employer in engaging
employees as casual or temporary employees for long period without giving them the status and privilege of
permanent employees.
19. Sec 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stipulates conditions precedent for retrenchment of workmen.
A workman employed in any industry who has been in continuous service for not less than one year under an
employer is entitled to benefit under the said provisions if the employer retrenches the workman. Such a
workman cannot be retrenched until he/she is given one month notice in writing indicating the reasons for
retrenchment and the period of notice has expired or the workman has been paid in lieu of such notice wages
for the period of the notice apart from compensation which shall be equivalent to 15 days average pay for every
completed year of continuous service or any part thereof in excess of 6 months. It also mandates the employer to
serve a notice in the prescribed manner on the appropriate Govt or such Authority as may be specified by
appropriate Govt by notification in the official Gazette. If any part of the provisions of Sec 25F is violated and
the employer there by, resorts to unfair trade practice with the object to deprive the workman with privilege as
provided under the Act, the employer cannot justify such an action by taking a plea that the initial appointment
of the employee was in violation of Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India.
(20) - - - - - - - - - - - -
(21) - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Para 22. It is always open to the employer to issue an order of “retrenchment“ on the ground that the
initial appointment of the workman was not in conformity with Article 14 &16 of the Constitution of India or in
accordance with rules. Even for retrenchment for such ground, unfair labour practice cannot be resorted to and
thereby the workman cannot be retrenched on such ground without notice, pay and other benefits in terms of Sec
25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, if continued for more than 240 days in a calendar year”.
The above decisions was also quoted with approval by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Durgapur
Casual Workers Union and others Vs Food Corporation of India and others, (2015) 5 SCC 786. The
Hon’ble Court held that an undertaking of the government which comes within the meaning of ‘industry’ or its
establishment cannot justify its illegal action including unfair labour practice nor can ask for different treatment
on the ground that public undertaking is guided by Articles 14 &16 of Constitution of India and the private
industries are not guided by 14 &16 of the Constitution. In Umrala Grama Panchayat Vs Secretary,
Municipal Employees Union, 2015 12 SCC 775 the Hon’ble Supreme Court directed that the services of the
workmen in that case be regularized and made permanent since they worked for more than 240 days in a
calendar year.
12.
In view of the above, it is very clear that the management terminated the service of the worker in clear
violation of the provisions of Sec 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
13.
The worker also pleaded that she was terminated from the service of the management Bank in violation
of Sec 25G of ID Act, 1947 on the ground that the employees much junior in service to her were retained in
2870 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
service when she was terminated from the service of the management Bank. The worker did not lead any
evidence to substantiate and support violation of 25G of ID Act. The worker also alleged that the management
appointed fresh hands against the post held by her for doing the same job which she was doing. Having
retrenched her from the service of the management Bank, the worker has a right to be offered re-employment
against any future vacancy in preference over others. According to the worker there is a violation of Sec 25H of
ID Act as well. However there is absolutely no evidence to support the claim of the worker that Sec 25H of ID
Act, 1947 is violated by the management Bank. The worker also alleged that the management violated the
provisions of Sec 25T of ID Act by resorting to unfair labour practice of employing the worker as a casual
worker and continued her service for years together. In this particular case, there is no evidence that the post
of sweeper-cum-peon in Perumbavoor branch of management Bank was regular at the relevant point of time.
Further there is no evidence that a permanent or temporary sweeper is appointed in her place by the
management Bank and hence there is no basis in the allegation of the worker that Sec 25T of ID Act is violated
by the management.
14.
Considering all the facts, pleadings and evidence in this case, I am inclined to hold that the
retrenchment of the worker from the service of the management Bank is abinitio void and is in violation of Sec
25F of ID Act, 1947. However the management had not violated Sec 25G, 25H and 25T of ID Act, 1947 as
decided above.
15.
Issue No. 3
Issue nos.1 & 2 regarding the legality of termination of the worker was decided in favour of the worker
and against the management. The learned Counsel for the worker argued that once this Tribunal found that the
termination of the worker was illegal, she is entitled for reinstatement in service with full back wages. The
learned Counsel for the management argued that in the special circumstances of this case, it may not be ideal to
order reinstatement with full back wages and he argued that it is ideal to provide monetary compensation in the
place of reinstatement. Relying on the decision of State of Uttarakhand and others Vs Rajkumar, 2019 1
LLJ 513 SC the learned Counsel for the management argued that the worker was a daily wages employee and
she continued as a daily wage employee and is not entitled for regularization considering the spirit of the
decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in State of Karnataka Vs Uma Devi, (Supra). The Hon’ble Supreme
Court in the above referred case relying on the decision of BSNL Vs Bhurumal, (2014) 7 SCC 177 and District
Development Officer and another Vs Satish Kantilal Amerelia 2018 12 SCC 298 held that in the
circumstances of that case it would be just and proper and reasonable to award lumpsum monetary
compensation to the workman in full and final satisfaction of his claim of reinstatement and other consequential
benefits. The Hon’ble Supreme Court has laid down the law on the subject in BSNL case (Supra) as follows;
“Para 33. It is clear from the readings of the aforesaid judgments that the ordinary principle of grant of
reinstatement with full back wages, when the termination is found to be illegal is not applied
mechanically in all cases. While that may be a position where services of a regular/permanent
workmen are terminated illegally and/or malafide and/or by way of victimization, of unfair labour
practice, etc. However when it comes to the case of termination of a daily wage worker and where the
termination is found illegal because of a procedural defect, namely, in violation of Sec 25F of the
Industrial Disputes Act, this Court is consistent in taking the view that in such cases reinstatement with
back wages is not automatic and instead the workman should given monetary compensation which will
meet the ends of justice. Rationale for shifting in this direction is obvious.
Para 34. The reasons for denying the relief for reinstatement in such cases are obvious. It is trite law
that when the termination is found to be illegal because of non payment of retrenchment compensation
and notice pay as mandatorily required U/s 25F of the ID Act, even after reinstatement, it is always
open to the management to terminate the services of that employee by paying him the retrenchment
compensation. Since such a workman was working on daily wage basis and even after he is reinstated
he has no right to seek regularization [see State of Karnataka Vs Uma Devi(3)]. Thus when he cannot
claim regularisation and he has no right to continue even as a daily wage worker, no useful purpose is
going to be served in reinstating such a workman and he can be given monetary compensation by the
Court itself in as much as if he is terminated again after reinstatement, he would receive monetary
compensation only in the form of retrenchment compensation and notice pay. In such a situation giving
the relief of reinstatement, that too after a long gap, would not serve any purpose.
Para 35. We would however, like to add a cavate here. There may be cases where termination of daily
wage worker is found to be illegal on the ground that it was resorted to as unfair labour practice or in
violation of the principles of last come first go viz. while retrenching such a worker daily wage juniors
to him were retained. There may also be a situation that persons junior to him were regularized under
some policy but the workman concerned terminated. In such circumstances, the terminated worker
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2871
should not be denied reinstatement unless there are some other weighty reasons for adopting the course
of grant of compensation instead of reinstatement. In such cases reinstatement should be the rule and
only in exceptional cases, for the reasons stated to be in writing, such relief can be denied.’’
The learned Counsel for the worker on the other hand relied on the decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme
Court in Jasmar Singh Vs State of Haryana and other, 2015 4 SCC 458 and argued that the worker is
entitled for reinstatement with full back wages since the order of termination was void abinitio. The
Hon’ble Supreme Court in the above case relied on the following observation of the court in Deepali Gundu
Surwase Vs Kranti Junior Adyapak Mahavidyalaya, 2013 10 SCC 324 to hold that when the termination is
found to be illegal, the workman is entitled for reinstatement with back wages.
“Para 22. The very idea of restoring an employee to the position which he held before dismissal or
removal or termination of service implies that the employee will be put in the same position in which
he would have been but for the illegal action taken by the employer. The injury suffered by a person
who is dismissed or removed or is otherwise terminated from service cannot easily be measured in
terms of money. With the passing of an order which has the effect of severing the employer-employee
relationship, the latter’s source of income gets dried up. Not only the employee concerned but his
entire family suffers grave adversities. They are deprived of the source of sustenance. The children are
deprived of nutritious food and all opportunities of education and advancement in life. At times, the
family has to borrow from relatives and other aquittance to avoid starvation. These sufferings
continued till the competent adjudicatory forum decides on the legality of the action taken by the
employer. The reinstatement of such an employee, which is preceded by a finding of the competent
judicial/quasi judicial body or Court that the action taken by the employer is ultravires the relevant
statutory provisions or the principles of natural justice, entitles the employee to claim full back wages.
If the employer was to deny back wages to the employee, or contesting his entitlement to get
consequential benefits then it is for him/her to specifically plead and prove that during the intervening
period the employee was gainfully employed and was getting the same emoluments. The denial of back
wages to an employee who has suffered due to an illegal act of the employer would amount to
indirectly punishing the employee concerned and rewarding the employer by relieving him of the
obligation to pay back wages including the emoluments”.
In the above case, the Hon’ble Supreme Court was considering the case of a workman working as a
daily paid worker in the office of Sub Divisional Officer (Karnal) for more than 240 days.
In the present case, it is true that the worker was engaged as a daily wage employee and she worked
continuously for more than 240 days one year before her termination. Further the claim of the worker regarding
unfair labour practice was found to be not proved. The management failed to establish that the worker was
gainfully engaged during the period of termination. Hence this is a fit case the dictum laid down by the
Hon’ble Supreme Court in State of Uttarakhand and others Vs Rajkumar, 2019 1 LLJ 513 SC is squarely
applicable. It is seen that the worker was engaged on a daily wage basis and she has already crossed the age of
45 and no other allegations against the management such as unfair labour practice could be proved in this
industrial dispute. In the circumstances of this case it would be just proper and reasonable to award lumpsum
monetary compensation to the worker in full and final satisfaction of her claim of reinstatement and other
consequential benefits. It is seen that the worker was working on a daily average wage of Rs.95/- when her
services were terminated on 07.01.2012. If she is reinstated in service with full back wages she will be entitled
to a back wages of approximately Rs.2,65,000/-. Further she is also entitled for the benefits under Sec 25F of
the Industrial Dispute Act. Taking into account all these aspects, it is felt that interest of justice will be met if the
management is directed to pay a lumpsum monetary compensation of Rs.3,00,000/- to the worker in full and
final settlement within one month from the notification of the award. Hence an award is passed holding that the
termination of the worker from the serviced of the management Bank from 07.01.2012 is illegal, unjust and
abinitio void. She is entitled for a lumpsum monetary compensation of Rs.3,00,000/- in lieu of full back wages
and other consequential benefits.
The award will come into force one month after its publication in the official Gazette.
Dictated to the Personal Assistant, transcribed and passed by me on this the 24th day of February,
2020.
V. VIJAYA KUMAR, Presiding Officer
2872 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
APPENDIX
Witness for the Workman:-
WW1
-
Smt.V. K. Nirmala, dt.25.01.2016
WW2
-
Shri.V. N. Krishnan, dt.14.10.2016
Witness for the Management:-
MW1 -
Shri. Krishnakumar E. N. dt. 08.02.2017
Exhibits for the Workman:-
W1
-
True copy of the letter dt.28.11.2011 submitted by workman to the Asst. Labout Commissioner
(C), Ernakulam
W2
-
Copy of the Report Failure of Conciliation proceedings dt.03.10.2012 of the Asst. Labour
Commissioner (C), Ernakulam
Exhibits for the Management:-
M1
-
True copy of the HR Resourcing Policy of the management Bank
M2
-
True copy of the statement of account No. 32850100000138 maintainedby workman at
Perumbavoor branch from 09.09.2009 to 31.12.2012
M3
-
True copy of the Ledger account statement of Sundry charges account No. 32850054511004 of
Perumbavoor branch from 13.07.2009 to 31.12.2012
M4
-
True copy of available Debit vouchers relating to wages paid to temporary employees account
No. 32850054511004 from 27.07.2009 to 07.01.2012
M5
-
True copy of the statement of Bonus account No. 32850052431001 maintained at Perumbavoor
branch from 13.07.2009 to 31.12.2012
M6
-
True copy of available Debit vouchers relating to Bonus paid to temporary employees to the
debit account No. 32850052431001 for the financial year 01.04.2009 to31.03.2012
M7
-
True copy of the Peon delivery book from 05.08.2009 to 14.01.2010
ubZ fnYyh] 9 uoEcj] 2020
-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;
ljdkj rqaxHknjk feujYl izk- fy- izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V
vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] caxyksj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 57@2013½ dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 09-11-2020 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-29011@32@2013-vkbZvkj ¼,e½]
uohu oS/k] mi funs'kd
New Delhi, the 9th November, 2020
S.O. 1016.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 57/2013) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Tungbhadra
Mineral Pvt. Ltd.and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 09.11.2020.
[No. L-29011/32/2013-IR(M)]
NAVIN VAIDYA, Dy. Director
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2873
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
BANGALORE
DATED : 28TH OCTOBER, 2020
PRESENT : JUSTICE SMT. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer
CR 57/2013
I Party
II Party
The General Secretary,
Tungbhadra Mineral Staff
& Workers Union,
Taranagar (Karnataka) - 583119,
The Executive Director,
M/s Tungbhadra Minerals Pvt. Ltd.,
HM Larochelle, Flat No. 302, No. 6,
Benson Cross Road, Benson Town,
Bangalore - 560046.
Appearance
Advocate for I Party : Mr. Muralidhara
Advocate for II Party : Mr. M. Kalidas
AWARD
The Central Government vide Order No. L-29011/32/2013-IR(M) dated 21.08.2013 in exercise of the
powers conferred by Clause (d) of Sub-Section (1) and Sub-Section2(A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute
Act, 1947 (for brevity ‘the Act’ hereafter) referred the following Industrial Dispute for adjudication.
“Whether the employee of Tungbhadra Minerals Pvt. Ltd. mass retrenchment is valid or not
and whether the terminal benefits paid by the management are sufficient? If not, what relief
the employees are entitled to?”
1.
The 1st Party Trade Union has espoused the cause of 54 of its members who were the employees of the
2nd Party and were retrenched vide order dated 31.12.2012. It is stated that the union had signed several
settlements with the Management relating to wage and service condition of the workmen in the past. In this
reference the legality of the retrenchment order is questioned. Their claim is, the 2nd Party is engaged in the
business of extraction of mining iron ore and the subsequent marketing; 2nd Party is a joint venture company
registered under the Companies Act; the Mysore Minerals Limited, a Government of Karnataka undertaking has
26% of the share holding, while V.M Salgaocar and Brothers has 74% of the share holding in the Company; the
Managing Director of the Mysore Minerals Limited is the Chairman of the 2nd party. Important decisions
pertaining to the Business and other affairs of the Company are taken by the Board of Directors; the company is
involved in mining and extraction of iron ore in various places of Bellary District, Karnataka. But the mining
operations in the region of Bellary, Hospet, Sandur etc., were suspended owing to the judgment of the Hon’ble
Apex Court in July 2011. The captive iron ore mines at KH Block (Bellary Iron Ore Mines) and Rajapura and
Appannahalli Iron Ore Mines suspended the mining operation in July 2011. 54 workmen engaged in mining
work and other allied jobs were directed to do maintenance job, security jobs etc. The Ore stocks collected so
far at the Captive mines of Rajapura and Appanahalli Iron Ore Mines were sold through e-tendering / e-auction
prior to July 2011 by Central Empowerment Committee constituted for monitoring the iron ore stock. The 2nd
Party received nearly 40 crores from the sale of the Iron ore, still there is huge stock of extracted iron ore in the
premises of the 2nd party, the share proceeds of the iron ore extracted in KH Block mines sold by CEC through
e-tendering / e-auction is yet to be received by the 2nd party. The Hon’ble Supreme Court has permitted
resumption of Mining Operations of prescribed quantity subject to clearance of Rehabilitation and Reclamation
plan in B-Category Mines. Thus, 2nd Party resumed Mining Operation at Rajapura and Appanahalli Iron Ore
Mines. Though the Mining Operation was suspended, the company was carrying on various other activities and
the workers were retained for the said job since July 2011.
2.
It is further claimed that, the 2nd Party issued individual notice dated 31.12.2012 terminating the
employment of all the workmen and officers, along with the notice of termination a cheque purported to be the
unpaid wages due to each workman for the month of November and December 2012, Gratuity, Retrenchment
Compensation, Leave Encashment etc, was enclosed. The 1st Party Union protested against unjust and illegal
layoff, they also protested against the short payment of retrenchment compensation. They had calculated the
retrenchment compensation without counting upon the House Rent Allowance payable to the workmen; upon
realising itself of the short payment of retrenchment compensation, the 2nd Party issued another cheque for
additional amount representing the short payment on 05.01.2013 but the date of the additional cheque was
mentioned as 31.12.2012 in order to cover up the lapses. The workers received the cheques under protest.
2874 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
After terminating the services of the permanent workers and officers, the 2nd Party engaged the services of
contract labour to carry on the work connected to e-tendering / e-auction, security and other allied permanent
jobs which were till then done by the permanent workers. Since, the 2nd Party had started a campaign in the
establishment that there would be mass retrenchment of employees, the 1st Party had raised an Industrial
Dispute vide petition dated 21.12.2012 before the Regional Labour Commissioner (C), Bellary Region. During
the pendency of the dispute, the 2nd Party resorted to mass retrenchment of its entire staff.
3.
It is further claimed that the action of retrenchment is illegal, the Board of Directors of the 2nd Party
was the Competent Authority, they had not discussed the issue of retrenchment and had not approved the
retrenchment. The Executive Director was not authorised by the Board of Directors to terminate the services of
the 1st Party workmen w.e.f 31.12.2012. As per the permission given by the Hon’ble Apex Court to extract iron
ore in B-category after submitting R and R plan, the 2nd Party had submitted R and R Plan in respect of
Rajapura and Appanahalli Iron Ore Mines but did not pursue the R and R Plan only with an intention to
terminate the services of the entire workforce. Short payment of retrenchment compensation to each workman
as on the date has rendered the retrenchment void ab initio, inoperative and invalid. Mass retrenchment was
effected without discussing with the 1st Party and without exploring the other possibilities of laying off the
workmen. Even the Conciliation Officer was not informed of the proposed retrenchment, though the
conciliation proceeding was in motion. The Mining operations were temporarily suspended and 2nd Party was
permitted to operate the mines in B-category subject to fulfilment of certain conditions. The 1st Party workmen
are entirely dependent on the jobs with the 2nd party, they have no prospects of getting employment elsewhere;
they cannot seek employment elsewhere because of the age factor and they have no other source of income.
4.
The claim is contested by the 2nd Party on following lines:-
the 1st Party Union has no authority to espouse the cause of the staffs / workers; the 1st Party workers have
accepted clean and unconditional termination letter, they have encashed the full and final terminal amount; 53
members of the staff had not recorded their protest; they have received excess amount of their statutory dues,
the demand now made is unlawful and unwarranted. Since it was impossible for the Management to continue
work any further, the staff / workers were taken into confidence by explaining the situation to them and their
terminal dues and benefits were worked out. The terminal benefit amounted to over Rs. 400 lakhs. Appropriate
notices were issued along with the cheque towards terminal benefits and other dues. As a gesture of goodwill
several amounts though not statutory required to be paid came to be included; the staffs / workers did not raise
objection to the termination but requested for some additional amount. Their prayer for additional benefits was
considered though such benefits were not legally due to them. The 1st Party members are paid wages in lieu of
one month’s notice or wages and compensation equivalent to 15 days average pay for every completed year of
continuous service or any part thereof in excess of 6 months. Following items are included in working of the
Retrenchment compensation:
i)
Salary for the month of November 2012
ii)
Salary for the month of December 2012
iii)
Notice pay – One month salary
iv)
Gratuity
v)
Retrenchment Compensation
vi)
Leave Encashment
vii) Production premium for the year 2010-11 to 2012-13(upto December 2012)
viii) Medical Allowance for the year 2012
ix)
Leave Travel Allowance for the year 2012
x)
Bonus at the rate of 20% for the year 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13 (upto December 2012) and
xi)
Annual increment arrears April 2012 – December 2012
The workmen are paid during the idle period also; the terminal benefits paid are much in excess of the
statutory entitlements. Export of iron ore is banned by the Karnataka State Government w.e.f 26.07.2010.
5.
It is further stated that the staff / workers strength in the 2nd Party is only 87, chapter V-B of ‘the Act’
is not applicable to them, hence no question of obtaining prior permission / approval from the Central
Government. It is impermissible for the staff / workers to go back upon the settlement and to raise additional
and frivolous demands. The 1st Party union in order to achieve their self interest is assisting for such demand.
6.
Evidence is adduced by both the parties. Two witnesses were examined for the 1st party; documents
Ex W-1 to Ex W-6 are marked for them.
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2875
MW-1 / the Director of the Tungabhadra Minerals Pvt. Ltd., is the sole witness for the 2nd Party,
through him 24 documents were exhibited.
The examination in chief evidence of the witnesses is nothing but reiteration of their claim statement /
counter statement averments.
7.
During the cross examination of MW-1 it emerged that decision to terminate the services of the
workmen was taken by Salgaocar Mining Industries Limited: the witness never worked at Taranagar
(concerning the 1st Party member) he had worked at Corporate Office, Goa thus he had no personal knowledge
about the retrenchment process and was not a Party to the conciliation proceeding. The witness explained the
circumstances under which two cheques were issued to the workmen by way of retrenchment compensation,
thus first cheque was issued by calculating as per the I.D Act benefits, on the request of the workmen they
updated the annual increment, bonus and then issued the second cheque; though there was no production,
premium incentive was paid; first cheque was returned by the workmen and the second cheque was accepted.
8.
WW-1 is the Secretary of the 1st Party Union and also one of the concerned workmen. In his affidavit
evidence he alleges that no workman was given cheque on 31.12.2012 by the Management; the workmen
protested against the unjust and illegal retrenchment on 01.01.2013, as they came to know that the retrenchment
compensation calculation was not correct; in the retrenchment compensation offered on 31.12.2012 the 2nd
Party had not taken into account annual increment and House Rent Allowance payable to the workmen,
realising the short calculation of the retrenchment compensation they issued another cheque for additional
amount representing the short payment on 05.01.2013: but by mentioning the date on the cheques as
31.12.2012, both cheques were handed over to the workmen around 15.01.2013 and the workmen received the
cheques under protest.
Ex W-2 is the notice dated 31.12.2012 served on the workman T Siddesh wherein his signature along
with his remark “UNDER PROTEST” is recorded.
9.
Vide Annexure Ex W-4 Regional Labour Commissioner was informed that notices were accompanied
by the cheque towards terminal benefits and other dues; in calculating the terminal benefits and other dues
several amounts though not statutory required to be paid came to be included again as a gesture of goodwill –
the workers raised no objection to the termination but requested for additional amount and the demand was not
based upon any statutory entitlement, but the same was a request for a “Golden Handshake”. The Management
conceded to the payment of additional benefits, though such benefits were neither legally due nor payable. The
workers returned cheques issued to them and the Management thereupon issued fresh notice along with cheques
for higher amounts.
During cross examination of WW-1 it was highlighted that the Management has also produced the
Photostat copy of notice dated 31.12.2012 pertaining to Siddesh as Ex M-3 but in the said document there is no
such endorsement “UNDER PROTEST”. The witness identified from the Management Document / Ex M-19
that it is the Final notice served on 31.12.2012 but there is no such endorsement “UNDER PROTEST” in the
said document. He admits that all his 53 co-employees received two cheques each along with a letter and
calculation sheet. The witness admits either in the claim statement or in the petition given to ALC (C) they had
not shown difference of amount which was due from the Management; this petition is not filed on the ground of
short payment.
10.
WW-2 is the Treasurer of the Union, through him the petition submitted by the Union to the
Conciliation Officer (Ex W-5) detailing 60 workmen who had submitted their affidavit authorising the Union
Representative to represent and to legally pursue the matter and Ex W-6 / the Photostat copy of the Conciliation
Failure Report dated 03.05.2013 were marked. However, the copy of the affidavit of the 60 workmen is not
produced to make the Tribunal understand as to whether the union was authorised to raise the present Industrial
Dispute.
11.
Fact that the mining operations were suspended throughout the State consequent upon the order passed
by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) Nos. 7366-7367/2010 (Ex M-7) and also the
order passed by the Government of Karnataka vide order dated 26.07.2010 (Ex M-6) and subsequent order
banning Mining, Transportation and Export of Iron Ore Mines was the factuality as on 31.12.2012 is known
universally. Further 2nd Party was a unit wherein the number of employees was less than 100 thus there was no
need for them to go for permission under Sec 25-N of ‘the Act’. The 1st Party members have received the
compensation under two cheques dated 31.12.2012 and it is not their case that the amount received by them
falls short of the ingredients of Sec 25-F (b) of ‘the Act’.
12.
From the case demonstrated by both the parties the short question that needs to be addressed is,
2876 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
i)
Whether the retrenchment effectuated on 31.12.2012 was in accordance with the procedure
contemplated by Sec 25-F of ‘the Act’?
The condition precedent for retrenchment of a worker as per Sec 25-F of ‘the Act’ is,
a)
The workman has been given one months’ notice in writing indicating the reasons for retrenchment
and period of notice has expired, or the workman has been paid in lieu of such notice, wages for the
period of notice.
b)
The workman has been paid, at the time of retrenchment, compensation which shall be equivalent to
15 days average pay for every completed year of continuous service or any part thereof in excess of
6 months
c)
…….
13.
On a travel through the pleadings and the evidence adduced by both the parties, the quantum of
compensation is not the lis between the parties but the date of payment of compensation is the controversy. The
payment of retrenchment compensation being condition precedent to retrench a workman, the 1st Party is
challenging the validity of the retrenchment order dated 31.12.2012 for not paying the legitimate dues before
issuing the retrenchment order.
The 2nd Party has produced Photostat copy of the letter of termination dated 31.12.2012 served on each
of the workman along with Photostat copies of two cheques to each one of them and the calculation sheet. So
much is made out during the cross examination of WW-1 that the workmen had not recorded their protest on the
termination orders, the very caption of the document Ex M-1 contrariety reads thus:
LIST OF STAFF WHO HAVE ACCEPTED UNDER PROTEST LETTER OF TERMINATION
HOWEVER HAVE DERIVED FULL BENEFITS FROM ENCASHMENT OF CHEQUE FOR FULL
AND FINAL SETTLEMENT AMOUNT.
But no such endorsement of protest can be seen on any of the termination orders from the Ex M-2 and
Ex M-3 series. However, these Ex M-3 series are not the original documents, the Ex M-3 series is described in
the Index as “Acceptance of Clean and Unconditional Termination letter”. The concerned workman apart from
signing the termination order have declared that they are accepting the amount being full and complete payment
for all the service rendered to the Company. Now the dispute revolves around the question on the factum of
actual date of payment of retrenchment compensation.
14.
The 1st Party has placed reliance on the following Authorities:
i)
Workmen of Coimbatore “B” Mills Ltd., vs Labour Court and others, 1980 I-LLJ Pg-503 (SC)
ii)
Somu Kumar Chatterjee and another vs District Judge, 1970 II-LLJ Pg-179 (Patna Division Bench)
iii)
Management of M/s. Penguine Textiles Ltd., vs Labour Court, 1975 Lab.I.C. Pg-526
(A.P High Court)
The rationale running in all these judgments is payment of retrenchment compensation is a condition
precedent for effective retrenchment of a workman - the retrenchment cannot be revalidated by subsequent
payment of compensation and the workman continues to be the employee of the employer.
15.
It is the fundamentals of the Evidence Act, that any amount of oral evidence cannot take over the
documentary proof. When the documents produced by either parties bare the date 31.12.2012 on the cheques,
where is the counter material to accept that the compensation was paid on 05.01.2013. The witness beyond the
claim statement pleading, has gone to the extent of stating that the cheque was issued on 15.01.2013. Having
raised the dispute in the middle of December itself on sensing the fate of the Establishment, they would not
have kept quite if only partial payment was given to them on 31.12.2012; from none of the document I get a
clue that they had documented about payment of partial retrenchment compensation. That drives me to hold
that the retrenchment compensation was paid along with the termination order but not subsequent thereto.
Moreover, the Authority of the Union for raising the dispute is questioned by the 2nd Party. No
resolution copy pertaining to the issue of retrenchment is produced by the 1st Party Trade Union, no
authorisation by concerned workmen enabling Sh. Gadad Veeranna, Secretary of the Union / WW-1 to sign the
claim statement is shown. That raises doubt about the Authority of Sh. Gadad Veeranna to pursue the dispute.
The correctness of the statement of calculation as worked out by the 2nd Party in reference to each individual
workman is not disputed, the receipt and utilisation of the compensation is established through Bank Statement
Ex M-23 and Ex M-24. It is also the fundamental principle of the Evidence Act that, it is the burden of the
Party who alleges a fact to prove the said fact. The oral evidence adduced by 1st Party fails to take over the
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 14, 2020/कार्तिक 23, 1942
2877
documentary proof in respect of date of payment of retrenchment compensation on 31.12.2012. As already
observed, there was no requirement for the 2nd Party to obtain permission from the Government to comply the
conditions under Sec 25-N of ‘the Act’ since the workmen strength did not exceed 100. For the discussion
supra, I hold that retrenchment of the employees of Tungabhadra Minerals Pvt. Ltd., is valid and the terminal
benefits paid by the Management was sufficient. The workmen are not entitled for any further relief under this
reference.
AWARD
The Reference is rejected.
(Dictated to o/s Steno, transcribed by her, corrected and signed by me on 28th October, 2020)
JUSTICE SMT. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 9 uoEcj] 2020
-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 11@2009½ dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 04-11-2020 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-20012@108@2008-vkbZvkj ¼lh,e-I½]
jktsUnz flag] MsLd vf/kdkjh@vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 9th November, 2020
S.O. 1017.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
No.1, Dhanbad (Ref. No.11 of 2009) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central
Government on 04.11.2020.
[No. L-20012/108/2008-IR(CM-I)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Desk Officer/Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947
Reference: No. 11/2009
Employer in relation to the management of Kusunda Area of M/S. B.C.C.L
AND
Their workman
Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers : None
For the workman : None
State : Jharkhand.
Industry: Coal
Dated : 31.07.2020
2878 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 14, 2020/KARTIKA 23, 1942
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AWARD
By Order No.L-20012/108/2008 IR (CM-1)) dated 27/02/2009 the Central Government in the Ministry
of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub–section (2A) of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“i) Whether the action of the Management of Kusunda Colliery of Kusunda Area of
M/s. BCCL in denying regularization as Trammers to Shri Somar Turi and 26 other
M/Loaders is justified and legal? ii) To what reliefs are the workmen concerned entitled
and from what date?”
Name of the employees working as Trammers:
1. Shri Somar Turi
2. Shri Sipahi Yadav
3. Shri Rajak Mian
4. Shri Rudal Chamar
5. Shri Balkishun Yadav
6. Shri Bittu Lal
7. Shri Amin Manjhi
8. Shri Darogi Mahato
9. Shri Rameshwar Mahato
10. Shri Rathu Gope
11. Shri Ganauri Paswan
12. Shri Nemu Bhuian
13. Shri Josh lal Saw
14. Shri Ramjee Bhuian
15. Shri Baleshwar Singh
16. Shri Sagir Ansari
17. Shri Lodha Tudu
18. Shri Tahir Mian (02502854)
19. Shri Afjal Ansari
20. Shri Md. Asir Ansari
21. Shri Tahir Mian (02928042)
22. Shri Ram Sajan Sharma
23. Shri Brihaspat Nonia
24. Shri Dashrath Bhuian
25. Shri Munshi Saw
26. Shri Bipin Tudu
27. Shri Ram Jagan Bhar
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed but the workman/union didn’t appear before the
Tribunal. However the management has appeared in this case, but subsequently management has left appearing
before the Tribunal and this case was reserved for ‘No Dispute’ Award on 13/02/2017 but award was not passed
due to retirement of P.O. Thereafter again regd. notice was issued to workman/union which returned with
endorsement of “ The office is always locked”. Now the Case is pending since 12/03/2009 and workman/union
is not appearing before Tribunal. so, it is felt that workman/union has lost its interest in this matter. Hence No
Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064
and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.
SURENDER
MAHADASAM
Digitally signed by SURENDER MAHADASAM
Date: 2020.11.21 13:04:56 +05'30'