5832 GI/202

(2975)

रजिस्ट्री सं. डी.एल. (एन) 04/0007/2003—05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

xxxGIDHxxx

xxxGIDExxx

प्राजिकार से प्रकाजित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप् ताजिक

WEEKLY

सं. 46]

नई दिल् ली, दिसम् बर 6—दिसम् बर 12, 2020, िजनवार/ अग्रिायण 15— अग्रिायण 21, 1942

No. 46] NEW DELHI, DECEMBER 6 – DECEMBER 12, 2020, SATURDAY/AGRAHAYANA 15–AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942

इस भाग में जभन् न ृष्‍ सं्‍ या िी िाती िज जिससे दक यि ृष क संकलन के प ृ में र ा िा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II— ण् ड 3—उृ- ण् ड (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों (रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर) द्वारा िारी दकए गए सांजवजिक आिेि और अजिसूचनाएं

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

जवत्त मंत्रालय

(जवत्तीय सेवाएं जवभाग)

नई दिल्ली, 5 अक् तूबर, 2020

का.आ. .1049—केंद्रीय सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम, 1976

(1987 में य ा संिोजित) के जनयम 10 के उृ जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में रा्‍ रीय कषजष और ग्रामीण जवकास बैंक और

नेिनल इंश्योरेंस कम्ृनी जलजमटेड के सूचीबद्ध कायाालयों को अजिसूजचत करती िज, जिनके 80% से अजिक

कमाचाररयों ने हिंिी का कायासािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जलया िज : -

सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-19122020-223791

CG-DL-W-19122020-223791

2976 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

क्र.सं.

जवत्तीय संस्ट् ा का नाम

कायाालयों की सं्‍या

1.

रा्‍ रीय कषजष और ग्रामीण जवकास बैंक

9

2.

नेिनल इंश्योरेंस कम्ृनी जलजमटेड

1

कुल

10

[फा. सं. 11016/2/2017-हिं.(अजि.)]

रािीव कुमार, सिायक जनिेिक (रािभाषा)

रािभाषा जनयम 1976 के जनयम 10 (4) के अंतगात अजिसूजचत दकए िाने वाले कायाालयों की सूची

1.

रा्‍ रीय कषजष और ग्रामीण जवकास बैंक

'यूफेट करमीिृेनजबहल्डंग'

2 और 3 मंजिल प् लॉट नं.22(2)

िन ेती, जिलांग– 793003

मेघालय

2.

रा्‍ रीय कषजष और ग्रामीण जवकास बैंक

िी.एस.रोड, दिसृुर

गुवािाटी- 721006

असम

3.

रा्‍ रीय कषजष और ग्रामीण जवकास बैंक

एनएससीबीमु्‍ यालय प्रिासजनक जबहल्डंग

चौ ी मंजिल, ेरमिल,

सकुालररोड

िीमाृुर– 797112

नागालैंड

4.

रा्‍ रीय कषजष और ग्रामीण जवकास बैंक

ओम जनवास, चचा रोड

गंगटोक- 737101

जसदिम

5.

बैंकरग्रामीण जवकास संस्ट् ान

बोलृुरलॉि,

ृो.ऑ. बोलृुर

जिला –बीरभूम– 731204

बोलृुर

6.

रा्‍ रीय कषजष और ग्रामीण जवकास बैंक

ृुन् नेनरोड, स्ट् टेच् यू

जतप वनंतृुरम– 695001

केरल

7.

रा्‍ रीय कषजष और ग्रामीण जवकास बैंक

जिल् ृाजनगम भवन

ग्राउंडफ्लोर, ेिूरबागान,

हिंिर िोटल के ृास

ृो.ऑ. कुिाबन,

अगरतला– 799 006

जत्रृुरा

2.

रा्‍ रीय कषजष और ग्रामीण जवकास बैंक

रामिलुनरोड (उत् तर)

बंगावन,

आइिॉल– 796014

जमिोरम

9.

रा्‍ रीय कषजष और ग्रामीण जवकास बैंक

1-1-61, आरटीसीक्रास रोड

मुिीराबाि

िजिराबाि – 500 020

तेलंगाणा

10.

नेिनल इंश्योरेंस कम्ृनी जलजमटेड,

दिल्ली क्षेत्रीय कायाालय -4,

कन्नेक्टस जबहल्डंग, 8वां तल,

भवभूजत मागा, नई दिल्ली-02.

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

2977

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Financial Services)

New Delhi, the 5th October, 2020

S.O. 1049.— In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official

purposes of the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government, hereby notifies the listed

Offices of National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development and National Insurance Company limited,

more than 80% of the staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-

Serial

No.

Name of the Financial Institution

Number of Offices

1.

National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development

9

2.

National Insurance Company limited

1

Total

10

[F. No. 11016/2/2017-OL(Noti.)]

RAJIV KUMAR, Assistant Director (OL)

List of Offices to be notified under Rule 10(4) of Official Language Rule 1976

1.

National Bank for Agriculture and Rural

Development

'U PhetKharmihpen Building'

2nd and 3rd floor,

Plot No.28(2), Dhankheti

Shillong- 793003

Meghalaya

2.

National Bank for Agriculture and Rural

Development

G.S.Road, Dispur

Guwahati – 781006

Assam

3.

National Bank for Agriculture and Rural

Development

NSCB Head Office Administration Building

4th floor, Circular Road, Khermahal,

Dimapur – 797112

Nagaland

4.

National Bank for Agriculture and Rural

Development

Om Niwas, Church Road

Gangtok- 737101

Sikkim

5.

Bankers' Institute of Rural Development

Bolpur Lodge

P.O.Bolpur

District Birbhum- 731204

Bolpur

6.

National Bank for Agriculture and Rural

Development

Punnen Road, Statue

Thiruvananthapuram- 695001

Kerala

7.

National Bank for Agriculture and Rural

Development

Shilpa Nigam Bhaban,

Ground Floor, Khejur Bagan

Near Ginger Hotel

P.O. Kungaben

Agartala- 799006

Tripura

8.

National Bank for Agriculture and Rural

Development

Ramhlun Road (North)

Bawngkawn

Aizawl- 796014

Mizoram

9.

National Bank for Agriculture and Rural

Development

1-1-61, RTC 'X' Road

Musheerabad,

Hyderabad – 500 020

Telangana

10. National Insurance Company limited,

Delhi Regional Office 4,

Konnectus Building, 8th Floor,

803 B , Tower C, Bhavbhuti Marg,

Opposite New Delhi Railway Station.

2978 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 5 अक् तूबर, 2020

का.आ. 1050.—केंद्रीय सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम, 1976

(1987 में य ा संिोजित) के जनयम 10 के उृ जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में भारतीय स्ट् टेट बैंक के सूचीबद्ध

कायाालयों/िा ाओं को अजिसूजचत करती िज, जिनके 20% से अजिक कमाचाररयों ने हिंिी का कायासािक ज्ञान प्राप्त

कर जलया िज : -

क्र.सं.

बैंक का नाम

कायाालयों / िा ाओं की सं्‍या

1.

भारतीय स्ट् टेट बैंक

143

कुल

143

[फा. सं. 11016/2/2017-हिं.(अजि.)]

रािीव कुमार, सिायक जनिेिक (रािभाषा)

रािभाषा जनयम 1976 के जनयम 10(4) के अंतगात अजिसूजचत दकए िाने वाले कायाालयों/िा ाओं की सूची

1.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक,

प्रिासजनक कायाालय 3

जद्वतीय तल, प्रिासजनक कायाालय,

अहिंसा भवन, नई दिल्ली-110060

2.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

क्षेत्रीय व्यवसाय कायाालय 4,

ए-ब्लॉक, तषतीय तल,

संसि मागा, नई दिल्ली-110001

3.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

क्षेत्रीय व्यवसाय कायाालय 3

ृीतम ृुरा, नई दिल्ली-110034

4.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक,

क्षेत्रीय व्यवसाय कायाालय 2,

तषतीय तल, प्रिासजनक कायाालय,

अहिंसा भवन, नई दिल्ली-110060

5.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक,

क्षेत्रीय व्यवसाय कायाालय 1

जद्वतीय तल, 23,

निफ़गढ़ रोड -110015

6.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

सोनीृत िा ा

ृी. बजग 33 सोनीृत गुर, मंडी जिला-

रोितक,

सोनीृत, िररयाणा -131001

7.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

राम कष्‍ण ृुरम िा ा,

सेक्टर 1, ब्लॉक 7,आर के ृुरम,

नई दिल्ली-110022

8.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक,

ांझावाला िा ा

ांझावाला गााँव,

नई दिल्ली -110081

9.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक,

िीटी रोड बिालगढ़ िा ा

सोनीृत, िररयाणा-131021

10.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

सुब्रतो ृाका िा ा

एयर फोसा,

डब्लूएसी सुब्रतो ृाका,

दिल्ली कैंट, नई दिल्ली-110010

11.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

िकूर बस्ट्ती िा ा

1067, रानीबाग माकेट,

नई दिल्ली-110034

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

2979

12.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

ृंिाबी बाग िा ा

2/85, क्लब रोड, ृंिाबी बाग,

नई दिल्ली-110026

13.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

आिािृुर िा ा

न्यू सब्िी मंडी, आिािृुर,

नई दिल्ली-110033

14.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

बािली िा ा

रर ाला रोड बािली,

नई दिल्ली-110042

15.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

िलालृुर िा ा

िलालृुर, सोनीृत,

िररयाणा-131103

16.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

भातगााँव िा ा

भटगााँव, सोनीृत,

िररयाणा -131022

17.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

िरर नगर िा ा

सी-47, िररनगर,

क्लॉक टावर,

नई दिल्ली-110064

18.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

सुभाष नगर िा ा

सुभाष नगर, डी-1,

अिय एन्क्लेव सुभाष,

नई दिल्ली -110027

19.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

एसएमई िा ा नारायणा

59 कम्यूजनटी सेंटर,

नारायणा इंडजस्ट्रयल एररया,

नई दिल्ली-110028

20.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

एडीबी सोनीृत िा ा

रेल्वे रोड, सोनीृत,

िररयाणा-131001

21.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

ृीबीबी ृीतमृुरा िा ा

ृीबीबी वजिाली, ृीतमृुरा,

नई दिल्ली-110034

22.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

गन्नौर मंडी िा ा

छोटी मंडी गौिाला,

सोनीृत, िररयाणा-131101

23.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

एसएमई िा ा नेतािी सुभाष प्लेस

एच-4, विामान नॉ ा एक्स प्लाज़ा,

प्र म तल, नई दिल्ली-110034

24.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

रोजिणी, नई दिल्ली सेक्टर-9 िा ा

िीृल प्लाज़ा जबहल्डंग,

डी.सी.चौक दिल्ली-110085

25.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

एटलस साइदकल सोनीृत िा ा

146 आर, मॉडल टाऊन,

सोनीृत, िररयाणा-131001

26.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

िकूरृुर (दिल्ली) िा ा

डी ब्लॉक, िकुरृुर, दिल्ली -110034

27.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

चौ ंडी (नई दिल्ली) िा ा

चौ ंडी,

नई दिल्ली -110018

28.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

्‍याला िा ा

्‍याला दिल्ली -110018

2980 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

29.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

ििााँगीरृूरी िा ा

ए-ब्लॉक, ििााँगीरृूरी,

दिल्ली -110033

30.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

मंगोलृूरी िा ा

लोकल िॉहृंग सेंटर,

ओ -ब्लॉक, मंगोलृुरी,

नई दिल्ली-110083

31.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

सुल्तानृूरी िा ा

बी ब्लॉक, सुल्तानृुरी,

नई दिल्ली-110086

32.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

रघुवीर नगर िा ा

रघुवीर नगर, नई दिल्ली -110027

33.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

सीओडी िकूरबस्ट्ती िा ा

ऑर्डानेंस जडृोट,

िकुरबस्ट्ती, दिल्ली -110056

34.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

एसएमई िा ा वज़ीरृुर आई ई

बी-76, वज़ीरृुर इंडस्ट्रीयल क्षेत्र,

नई दिल्ली-110052

35.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

िीटी करनाल रोड इंडस्ट्रीयल कॉम्प्लेक्स

िा ा कोड

िीआई -23,िीटी करनाल रोड

इंडस्ट्रीयल कॉम्प्लेक्स, नई दिल्ली-

110033

36.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

इंद्रलोक िा ा

313/10 बी इंद्रलोक,

नई दिल्ली-110035

37.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

ज्वालाृुरी िा ा

िे िे कॉलोनी, ए-ब्लॉक,

कैंृ नं. 4, नई दिल्ली-110087

38.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

ज्वालिरी िा ा

ृजिम जविार, नई दिल्ली-110063

39.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

सजमृुर िा ा

मंदिर मोिल्ला मेन रोड,

समयृुर, नई दिल्ली-110042

40.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

नरेला िा ा

बवाना रोड, नरेला दिल्ली,

दिल्ली-110040

41.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

केिवृुरम िा ा

सी 7, सेंटरल माकेट,

प्र म तल,

केिव ृुरम,

दिल्ली -110035

42.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

मुंडका िा ा

गााँव एवं ृोस्ट्ट- मुंडका,

नई दिल्ली-110041

43.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

जतरकी कलान िा ा

रटकरी कलान,

नई दिल्ली-110041

44.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

ृल्ला िा ा

गााँव एवं ृोस्ट्ट -ृल्ला ,

दिल्ली -110036

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

2981

45.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

ेरा ुिा िा ा

गााँव एवं ृोस्ट्ट - ेरा ुिा,

नई दिल्ली-110082

46.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

मोतीलाल नेिप स्ट्ृोर्टसा स्ट्कूल राय िा ा

मोतीलाल नेिप स्ट्ृोर्टसा,

स्ट्कूल गााँव -राय, सोनीृत,

िररयाणा-131029

47.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

र ोिा िा ा

सोनीृत रोड,

र ोिा बस स्ट्टैंड के ृास,

सोनीृत, िररयाणा-131402

48.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

ृू ुिा िा ा

गााँव - ृू ुिा,

नई दिल्ली -110039

49.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

ल िा ा

गााँव एवं ृोस्ट्ट-ल लेि-गोिाना,

जिला - सोनीृत,

िररयाणा-131001

50.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

लरसौली िा ा

जिला - सोनीृत,

िररयाणा-131039

51.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

श्रीनगर कॉलोनी िा ा

बी 1/10, अिोक जविार,

फेि-I, नई दिल्ली-110052

52.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

री ाला िा ा

गााँव एवं ृोस्ट्ट- री ाला,

नई दिल्ली-110085

53.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

बवाना (दिल्ली) िा ा

नरेला रोड,

नई दिल्ली-110039

54.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

मिजलस ृाका िा ा

ए-11, मिजलस ृाका,

दिल्ली-110033

55.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

मािरा िबास िा ा

मािरा िबास (दिल्ली),

नई दिल्ली-110081

56.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

र िाना रोड (लिरारा) िा ा

र िाना रोड लिरारा,

सोनीृत, िररयाणा-131001

57.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

जचताना िा ा

गााँव-जचताना,

ृोस्ट्ट- मिरा सोनीृत,

िररयाणा-131024

58.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

सावन ृाका िा ा,

के-4, सावन ृाका,

दिल्ली -110052

59.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

जवकासृुरी िा ा

िी-3, , जवकासृुरी,

नई दिल्ली-110018

60.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

ृजिम जविार िा ा

डीडीए िॉहृंग सेंटर, ए-1,

ृजिम जविार,

नई दिल्ली -110063

2982 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

61.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

मीरा बाग िा ा

ए 336, आउटर ररंग रोड,

मीरा बाग, नई दिल्ली-110087

62.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

केसोृुर िा ा

ए-5, डब्लूज़ेड -2/1ए,

साजिबृुरा, नई दिल्ली-110018

63.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

जिला कोटा, रोजिणी िा ा

जिला कोटा, रोजिणी,

अन्तररक्ष अृाटामेंट के ृास,

नई दिल्ली -110085

64.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

दिल्ली कॉलेि ऑफ इंिीजनयररंग िा ा

बवाना रोड,

नई दिल्ली-110042

65.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

िाजलमार बाग िा ा

बी टी-35 , िाजलमार बाग,

नई दिल्ली-110088

66.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

िास्त्री नगर िा ा

ई 2/ 234-235, िास्त्री नगर,

नई दिल्ली-110052

67.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

अिोक जविार िा ा

िीत जबहल्डंग, 11 सेंरल माकेट,

अिोक जविार फेस-1,

नई दिल्ली-110052

68.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

कोिट एन्क्लेव ृीतमृुरा िा ा

369 कोिाट एंक्लव, ग्राउंड फ्लोर,

ृीतमृुरा, नई दिल्ली-110034

69.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

ृीतमृुरा नागलोई िा ा

530/2 , नागलोई चौक,

निफ़गढ़ रोड, नांगोलोई,

नई दिल्ली-110041

70.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

रोजिणी सेक्टर-12 िा ा

िाउस सं-69-70, ृॉकेट नं-एफ-22 ,

िी एफ, सेक्टर- रोजिणी,

नई दिल्ली-110025

71.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

रोजिणी सेक्टर-11िा ा

ृासकान जबहल्डंग गगा रेड सेंटर,

सेक्टर-11, रोजिणी,

नई दिल्ली-110085

72.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

रोजिणी सेक्टर-24 िा ा

सीएस /ओसीएफ नं. 7

(बेस्ट्ट मेगा मॉल),

प्र म तल, सेक्टर 24, रोजिणी,

नई दिल्ली-110085

73.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

टजगोर गाडेन िा ा,

बी-20-21, िॉहृंग सेंटर,

टजगोर सेंटर, टजगोर गाडेन,

नई दिल्ली-110027

74.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

उत्तरी ृीतमृुरा दिल्ली िा ा

एफयू -1, उत्तरी ृीतमृुरा,

दिल्ली-110088

75.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

गोिाना िा ा

िुकान सं-84, नई अनािमंडी,

सोनीृत, िररयाणा-124301

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

2983

76.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

डीबीआरसी यूजनवर्साटी ऑफ साइंस एंड

टेक्नोलोिी मु ाल िा ा

मु ाल, सोनीृत,

िररयाणा-131039

77.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

एसएमई सीसीसी िीटी करनाल रोड िा ा

बी-248, प्र म तल,

डेरवाल नगर,

नई दिल्ली-110009

78.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

आरएसीृीसी नेतािी सुभाष ृजलेस िा ा

ृला बेस्ट्ट िाइट आई ृीतमृुरा,

दिल्ली-110034

79.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

एसएमई सीसीसी िा ा

नरायणा इंडजस्ट्रयल एररया,

नई दिल्ली-110028

80.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

रोजिणी सेक्टर 18 िा ा

रोजिणी ृॉकेट एच-3,

नई दिल्ली-110085

81.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

गुरु िरदकिन नगर िा ा

एम-125, गुरु िरकष्‍ण नगर,

नई दिल्ली-110041

82.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

िेल रोड िररनगर िा ा

एएल -6, एल ब्लॉक,

नई दिल्ली-110064

83.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

िस्ट्तसाल जवकासृुरी िा ा

ए-8, जवकासृुरी,

नई दिल्ली-110018

84.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

स्ट्काब नो िा ा

प्लॉट नं.89, ब्लॉक बी,

विीरृुर इंडजस्ट्रयल एररया,

दिल्ली-110052

85.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

राय इंडजस्ट्रयल एररया िा ा

टीृी1, सेक्टर-38,

एचएसआईआईडीसी के ृास,

सोनीृत, िररयाणा-131029

86.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

गणेि नगर िा ा

1/20, जतलक नगर लाल बत्ती के ृास,

नई दिल्ली-110019

87.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

जमयााँवाजल नगर िा ा

9 ृजिम एनक्लेव,

नई दिल्ली, 110087

88.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

वेस्ट्ट एवेन्यू ृंिाबी बाग िा ा

2/52, ृंिाबी बाग वेस्ट्ट एवेन्यू,

नई दिल्ली-110026

89.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

ृु्‍ृांिजल एन्क्लेव िा ा

बी-96, ृु्‍ृांिजल एन्क्लेव,

नई दिल्ली -110034

90.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

िे ब्लॉक रािौरी गाडेन िा ा

िे9/34 रािौरी गाडेन,

नई दिल्ली-110027

91.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

माया एन्क्लेव मायाृुरी िा ा

डी-2/डी-3, मायाृुरी फेि-II,

लाल बत्ती के सामने,

2984 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

माया एनक्लेव,

नई दिल्ली-110064

92.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

नािरी जिला सोनीृत िा ा

गााँव एवं ृोस्ट्ट-नािरी सोनीृत,

िररयाणा-131003

93.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

सेक्टर-14 सोनीृत िा ा

प्लॉट सं 1, 2, टी.ृी. स्ट्कीम सोनीृत,

िररयाणा-131001

94.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

जमनी सेदक्रटेररयट सोनीृत िा ा

नई डी.सी. जबहल्डंग, गोिाना रोड,

सोनीृत, िररयाणा-131001

95.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

रािृूताना राइफल्स िा ा

भारत सरकार, एम/ओ जडफेंस,

रािृूतना राइफल, नई दिल्ली-110010

96.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

सजिृुर िा ा

गााँव एवं ृोस्ट्ट -सजिृुर,

सोनीृत, िररयाणा-131402

97.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

मोिाना जिला सोनीृत िा ा

गााँव एवं ृोस्ट्ट: मोिना,

सोनीृत, िररयाणा-131001

98.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

अजलृुर िा ा 240, नेिप एनक्लेव,

नई दिल्ली-110036

99.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

राििानी एन्क्लेव ृीतमृुरा िा ा

प्लॉट नं. 2, रोड 44,

ृीतमृुरा, नई दिल्ली-110034

100.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

िंकर जविार िा ा

आईएचदकउ मोड(आमी) सीए,

राव तुला राम मागा,

नई दिल्ली-110010

101.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

सेक्टर 8 िीृाली चौक रोजिणी िा ा

प्लॉट नं. 9, ृॉकेट ए1,

सेक्टर 8 (िीृाली चौक के ृास) रोजिणी,

नई दिल्ली-110085

102.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

सबीआई इन टच

गुरु गोजबन्ि हसंि मागा िा ा

बीएच 7 िालीमार बाग ृूवा,

दिल्ली-110088

103.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

एसबीआई इन टच

जिवािी एन्क्लेव िा ा

िीएन -3, जिवािी एनक्लेव,

नई दिल्ली-110027

104.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

ए एल माकेट िालीमार बाग िा ा

एएल ब्लॉक, डीडीए िॉहृंग कॉम्प्लेक्स,

िालीमार बाग, दिल्ली -110052

105.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

रोजिणी नई दिल्ली िा ा

ब्लॉक नं. ई -2/25, ग्राउंड फ्लोर,

सेक्टर-7, नई दिल्ली-110085

106.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

एमएसएमई िा ा

प्र म तल, अग्रवाल चेतन प्लाज़ा,

प्लॉट सं-1, 2,

लोकल िॉहृंग सेंटर,

ृॉकेट, सेक्टर ए 9, नरेला,

दिल्ली -110040

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

2985

107.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

रटकरी ुिा िा ा

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक,

िाटों वाली गली,

रेिन कोटा कायाालय के ृास,

रटकरी ुिा, नई दिल्ली -110040

108.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

जविाल एनक्लेव िा ा

ए-30 , जविाल एनक्लेव,

नई दिल्ली-110027

109.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

सेक्टर-14, रोजिणी िा ा

सेक्टर 14 एक्सटेंिन,

नई दिल्ली-110085

110.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

एनआईई फेज़-I िा ा

प्र म तल,

नरायणा इंडजस्ट्रयल इस्ट्टेट फेि 1,

जिला- नई दिल्ली (110028)

111.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

एमसीबी लारेंस रोड िा ा

5 कम्यूजनटी सेंटर, लारेंस रोड,

जिला -दिल्ली -110035

112.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

रेलवे रोड सोनीृत िा ा

रेलवे रोड, सोनीृत,

िररयाणा-131001

113.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

सेक्टर-5 रोजिणी िा ा

रोजिणी, दिल्ली -110085

114.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

डीएवी स्ट्कूल कैंृस िा ा

िरबारी लाल, डीएवी स्ट्कूल,

बीएन ब्लॉक, िाजलमार बाग,

दिल्ली-110088

115.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

िीएमवी कॉलेि िा ा

मु ाल रोड, िी वी एम गल्सा कॉलेि,

सोनीृत, िररयाणा-131001

116.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

नजिनल माकेट िा ा ृजिम एन्क्लेव िा ा

प्लॉट सं. 2 एवं 3,

लोकल िॉहृंग कॉम्प्लेक्स,

ब्लॉक एफ, प्र म तल,

नेिनक माकेट के सामने,

ृजिम एन्क्लेव-110087

117.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

गोिाना िा ा

वडोिरा रोड, जिला-सोनीृत,

िररयाणा-131301

118.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

िी.टी.रोड मूर ल िा ा

िी.टी. रोड, जिला- सोनीृत ,

िररयाणा -131027

119.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

मोडेल टाउन सोनीृत िा ा

ृुराने कोटा के ृास, रोितक रोड,

सोनीृत, िररयाणा-131001

120.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

एसएमई कुंडली िा ा

िंजत रोड, कुंडली, सोनीृत,

िररयाणा-131028

121.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

ृू कलान िा ा

ब्लॉक कंिािवाला ृू कलान,

नई दिल्ली-110041

2986 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

122.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

कराला िा ा

कराला, नई दिल्ली -110081

123.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

रमा माकेट िा ा

ृीतमृुरा नई दिल्ली -110034

124.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

बिमाजलक िा ा

ृोस्ट्ट-ृी एस राय,

सोनीृत, िररयाणा-131029

125.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

िगसी िा ा

अगसी, तिसील-गोिाना,

जिला- सोनीृत, िररयाणा -124319

126.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

िोनती ब्लॉक नई दिल्ली िा ा

गााँव -िाऊन्ती,

नई दिल्ली-110081

127.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

गढ़वाल िा ा

गााँव एवं ृोस्ट्ट- गढ़वाल,

जिला- सोनीृत,

िररयाणा-131030

128.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

सोनीृत जमजन सेक्टर िा ा

जमजन सेक्रेटररयट,

सोनीृत, िररयाणा-131001

129.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

वाई.एस. मॉडेल स्ट्कूल िा ा

फेि - I, बुि जविार,

नई दिल्ली-110086

130.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

रोजिणी नई दिल्ली िा ा

सीएससी -II, सेक्टर-13,

डीडीए माकेट, प्र म तल,

रोजिणी, दिल्ली -110034

131.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

गन्नौर िा ा

छोटीमंडी, रेलवे. आरडी.

गन्नौर, सोनीृत,

िररयाणा-131101

132.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

आरएसीृीसी, नारायणा इंडजस्ट्रयल एररया

िा ा

दिल्ली 59, कम्यूजनटी सेंटर,

नारायणा इंडजस्ट्रयल एररया,

नई दिल्ली-110028

133.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

दिल्ली नरेला िा ा

डी160डी160, प्र म तल,

एफसी -IV,

डीएसआईआईडीसी, इंडजस्ट्रयल कॉम्प्लेक्स,

नरेला, दिल्ली -110001

134.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

गोिाना(एएम) िा ा

अनाि मंडी, गोिाना,

सोनीृत, िररयाणा-136128

135.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

नई दिल्ली (अिोक जविार) िा ा

िजि नगर एक्सटेंिन,

अिोक जविार, फेि 3,

नई दिल्ली (अिोक जविार),

दिल्ली -110052

136.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

नई दिल्ली (जवकासृुरी) िास्ट्टसल एररया

िा ा

जवकासृूरी (िास्ट्टसल एररया),

नई दिल्ली -110018

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

2987

137.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

सरगा ाल िा ा

आ.सं. 577,

ृीडब्लूडी रोड,

गााँव एवं ृोस्ट्ट-सरग ल ,

जिला-सोनीृत,

िररयाणा -131305

138.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

गोिाना जमजन सेक्टर िा ा

नई जबहल्डंग,

सोनीृत रोड,

गोिाना, िररयाणा-131301

139.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

नांगलोई िाट िा ा

के-61, अध्याृक नगर,

मु्‍य निफ़गढ़ रोड,

नारायण िमाकांटा नांगलोई के ृास,

नई दिल्ली-110041

140.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

ईस्ट्ट ृंिाबी मागा िा ा

28/12, ईस्ट्ट ृंिाबी बाग,

नई दिल्ली-110026

141.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

सेक्टर-8 आर.सी.कॉम्प्लेक्स रोजिणी िा ा

ृी.बी. नं. 10005,

बालािी प्लाज़ा,

सेक्टर-8, रोजिणी, दिल्ली-110085

142.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

विीरृुर िा ा

आर.िी. जसटी सेंटर,

बी-ब्लॉक एलएससी,

लॉरेंस रोड, दिल्ली-110035

143.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

अवतार एन्क्लेव ृजिम जविार िा ा

प्लॉट नं. 182, अवतार एनक्लेव,

ृजश् चम जविार, नई दिल्ली-110063

New Delhi, the 5th October, 2020

S.O. 1050.— In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official

purposes of the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government, hereby notifies the listed

Offices/ Branches of State Bank of India, more than 80% of the staff whereof have acquired the working

knowledge of Hindi:-

Serial

No.

Name of the Bank

Number of Offices/Branches

1.

State Bank of India

143

Total

143

[F. No. 11016/2/2017-OL(Noti.)]

RAJIV KUMAR, Assistant Director (OL)

LIST OF OFFICES/ BRANCHES TO BE NOTIFIED UNDER RULE 10(4) OF

OFFICIAL LANGUAGE RULES 1976

1.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE 3

2ND FLOOR ADMIN OFFICE AHINSA

BHAWAN,

NEW DELHI 110060

2.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE

4 A-BLOCK, 3 RD FLOOR

PARLIAMENT STREET,

NEW DELHI 110001

3.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE 3

PITAM PURA,

NEW DELHI-110034

4.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE 2

3RD FLOOR ADMIN OFFICE AHINSA

BHAWAN,

NEW DELHI 110060

2988 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

5.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE 1

2ND FLOOR,23,

NAJAFGARH ROAD-110015

6.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SONIPAT BRANCH

P. BAG 33 SONEPAT GUR MANDI

DIST:ROHTAK, SONIPAT,

HARYANA-131001

7.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

RAM KRISHNA PURAM

NEW DELHI BRANCH

SECTOR 1,

BLOCK 7,

RK PURAM,

NEW DELHI-110022

8.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

KHANJAWALA BRANCH

KANJHAWALA VILLAGE,

NEW DELHI-110081

9.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

G.T. ROAD BAHALGARH BRANCH

SONIPAT,

HARYANA-131021

10.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SUBROTO PARK BRANCH

AIRFORCE WACSUBROTO PARK ,

DELHI CANTT,

NEW DELHI-110010

11.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SHAKUR BASTI BRANCH

1067, RANIBAGH MARKET,

NEW DELHI-110034

12.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

PUNJABI BAGH BRANCH

2/85, CLUB ROAD,

PANJABI BAGH,

NEW DELHI-110026

13.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

AZADPUR BRANCH

NEW SUBJI MANDI AZADPUR,

NEW DELHI-110033

14.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

BADLI BRANCH

RITHALA ROAD BADLI,

NEW DELHI-110042

15.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

HALALPUR BRANCH

HALALPUR,

SONIPAT,

HARYANA-131103

16.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

BHATGAON BRANCH

BHATGAON,SONIPAT,

HARYANA-131022

17.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

HARINAGAR BRANCH

C-47, HARINAGAR,

CLOCK TOWER,

NEW DELHI-10064

18.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SUBHASH NAGAR BRANCH

SUBHASH NAGAR, D-1,

AJAY ENCLAVE SUBHASH,

NEW DELHI-110027

19.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SME BRANCH NARAINA IND. AREA

59 COMMUNITY CENTRE,

NARAINA INDUSTRIAL AREA,

NEW DELHI-110028

20.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

ADB, SONEPAT BRANCH

RAILWAY ROAD,

SONEPAT,

HARYANA-131001

21.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

P B B PITAMPURA BRANCH

P B B VAISHALI PITAMPURA

NEW DELHI-110034

22.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

GANNAUR MANDI BRANCH

CHOTI MANDI GAUSHALA, SONIPAT

HARYANA-131101

23.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SME BRANCH,

NETAJI SUBHASH PALACE BRANCH

H-4,VARDHMAN NORTH EX PLAZA,

1ST FLOOR,

NEW DELHI-110034

24.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

ROHINI DELHI SECTOR-9 BRANCH

DEEPAL PLAZA BUILDING,

D.C.CHOWK DELHI-110085

25.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

ATLAS CYCLE INDUSTRIES

SONEPAT BRANCH

146 R, MODEL TOWN,

SONEPAT, HARYANA-131001

26.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SHAKURPUR (DELHI) BRANCH

D BLOCK, SHAKURPUR,

DELHI-110034

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

2989

27.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

CHAUKHANDI (NEW DELHI)

BRANCH CHAUKHANDI,

NEW DELHI-110018

28.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

KHYALA BRANCH

KHYALA DELHI-110018

29.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

JAHANGIRPURI BRANCH

A- BLOCK, JAHANGIRPURI,

DELHI-110033

30.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

MANGOLPURI BRANCH

LOCAL SHOPPING CENTRE,

O-BLOCK, MANGOLPURI,

NEW DELHI-110083

31.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SULTANPURI BRANCH

B BLOCK, SULTANPURI,

NEW DELHI-10086

32.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

RAGHUBIR NAGAR BRANCH

NEW DELHI-110027

33.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

C.O.D.SHAKUR BASTI BRANCH

ORDINANCE DEPOT,

SHAKURBASTI, DELHI-110056

34.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SME BRANCH,

WAZIRPUR IND ESTATE,

B-76, WAZIRPUR IND. AREA,

NEW DELHI-110052

35.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

G.T.KARNAL ROAD IND. COMPLEX

BRANCH

GI-23, G.T.KARNAL ROAD,

INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX,

NEW DELHI-110033

36.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

INDERLOK BRANCH

313/10B INDERLOK, DELHI,

NEW DELHI-110035

37.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

JAWALAPURI BRANCH

JJ COLONY, A-BLOCK,

CAMP NO. 4,

NEW DELHI-110087

38.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

JAWALA HERI VILLAGE BRANCH

PASCHIM VIHAR,

NEW DELHI-110063

39.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SAMEPUR BRANCH

MANDIR MOHALLA MAIN ROAD,

SAMEPUR DELHI, NEW DELHI-110042

40

STATE BANK OF INDIA

NARELA BRANCH

BAWANA ROAD,

NARELA DELHI, DELHI-110040

41.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

KESHAVPURAM BRANCH

C 7, CENTRAL MARKET FIRST

FLOOR KESHAV PURAM,

DELHI-110035

42.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

MUNDKA BRANCH

VILLAGE AND PO MUNDKA,

NEW DELHI-110041

43.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

TIKRI KALAN BRANCH

TIKRI KALAN,NEW DELHI-110041

44.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

PALLA BRANCH

DELHI VILLAGE AND P.O.PALLA,

DELHI-110036

45.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

KHERA KHURD BRANCH

VILL AND PO KHERA KHURD,

NEW DELHI-110082

46.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

MSNL OF SPORTS RAI BRANCH

MOTILAL NEHRU SPORTS,

SCHOOL VILLAGE RAI,

SONEPAT, HARYANA-131029

47.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

KHARKHODA BRANCH

SONIPAT ROAD NEAR BUS STAND

KHARKHODA, SONEPAT,

HARYANA-131402

48.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

POOTH KHURD BRANCH

POOTH KHURD VILLAGE,

NEW DELHI-110039

49.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

LATH BRANCH

V.P.O. LATH TEH-GOHANA,

DISTT-SONEPAT,

HARYANA-131001

50.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

LARSOULI BRANCH

DISTT-SONEPAT,

HARYANA-131039

2990 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

51.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SRI NAGAR COLONY BRANCH

B 1/10, ASHOK VIHAR,

PHASE I, NEW DELHI-110052

52.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

RITHALA BRANCH

VILLAGE AND POST RITHALA,

NEW DELHI-110085

53.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

BAWANA(DELHI) BRANCH

NARELA ROAD, NEW DELHI-110039

54.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

MAJLIS PARK BRANCH

A-11, MAJLIS PARK,

DELHI-110033

55.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

MAJRA DABAS BRANCH

MAJRA DABAS (DELHI),

NEW DELHI-110081

56.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

RATHDANA ROAD BRANCH

RATHDANA ROAD LAHRARA,

SONEPAT,

HARYANA-131001

57.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

CHITANA BRANCH

VILL-CHITANA,

PO MAHRA, SONEPAT,

HARYANA-131024

58.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SAWAN PARK BRANCH

K-4, SAWAN PARK,

DELHI-110052

59.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

VIKASPURI BRANCH

G-3, VIKASPURI, NEW DELHI-110018

60.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

PASCHIM VIHAR BRANCH

DDA SHOPPING CENTRE, A-1,

PASCHIMVIHAR, NEW DELHI-110063

61.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

MEERA BAGH BRANCH

A 336, OUTER RING ROAD,

MEERA BAGH, NEW DELHI-110087

62.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

KESHOPUR BRANCH

A-5, WZ-2/1A, SAHIBPURA,

NEW DELHI-110018

63.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

DISTRICT COURT ROHINI BRANCH

DISTRICT COURT ROHINI, NEAR

ANTARIKSH APAR,

NEW DELHI-110085

64.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

DELHI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

BRANCH BAWANA ROAD,

NEW DELHI-110042

65.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SHALIMAR BAGH BRANCH

BT-35, SHALIMAR BAGH,

NEW DELHI-110088

66.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SHASTRI NAGAR BRANCH

E 2/234-235, SHASTRI NAGAR,

NEW DELHI-110052

67.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

ASHOK VIHAR BRANCH

JEET BUILDING, 11 CENTRAL

MARKET, ASHOK VIHAR PHASE-I,

NEW DELHI-110052

68.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

KOHAT ENCLAVE PITAMPURA

BRANCH 369 KOHAT ENCLAVE,

GR FLOOR, PITAMPURA,

NEW DELHI-110034

69.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

NANGLOI BRANCH

530/3 NANGLOI CHOWK,

NAJAFGARH ROAD,

NANGLOI,

NEW DELHI-110041

70.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

ROHINI SEC-12 BRANCH

HOUSE NO 69-70, POCKET NO,

F-22 G F, SEC- ROHINI,

NEW DELHI-110085

71.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

ROHINI SECTOR-11 BRANCH

PASCON BHILDING GARG TRADE

CENTRE, SECTOR-11, ROHINI,

NEW DELHI-110085

72.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

ROHINI SEC 24 BRANCH

CS/OCF NO.7 (BEST MEGA MALL)

1ST FLOOR SEC 24 ROHINI,

NEW DELHI-110085

73.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

TAGORE GARDENBRANCH

B-20-21, SHOPPING CENTRE,

TAGORE CENTRE, TAGORE

GARDEN,

NEW DELHI-110027

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

2991

74.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

UTTARI PITAMPURA

DELHI BRANCH STATE BANK OF

INDIA,

FU-1,

UTTARI PITAMPURA

DELHI, DELHI-110088

75.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

GOHANA BRANCH

SHOP NO.84,

NEW ANAJMANDI SONEPAT,

HARYANA-124301

76.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

D.C.R.U.S.T. MURTHALBRANCH

MURTHAL, SONIPAT,

HARYANA-131039

77.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SMECCC GT KARNAL ROAD

BRANCH

B-248, 1ST FLOOR DERAWAL

NAGAR.

NEW DELHI-110009

78.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

RACPC NETAJI SUBHASH PLACE

BRANCH RACPC NETAJI SUBHASH

PLACE,

PEARL BEST HEIGHT I

PITAMPURA,

DELHI-110034

79.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SMECCC NARAINA BRANCH

NARAINA INDUSTRIAL AREA,

NEW DELHI-110028

80.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SECTOR-18 ROHINI BRANCH

ROHINI POCKET H-3,

NEW DELHI-110085

81.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

GURU HARKRISHAN NAGAR

BRANCH

M-125 GURU HARKRISHAN NAGAR,

NEW DELHI-110041

82.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

JAIL ROAD HARI NAGAR BRANCH

AL-6, L BLOCK,

NEW DELHI-110064

83.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

HASTSAL VIKAS PURI BRANCH

A-8 VIKAS PURI,

NEW DELHI-110018

84.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SCAB NORTH BRANCH

PLOT NO 89 BLOCK B, WAZIRPUR

INDUSTRIAL AREA, DELHI-110052

85.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

RAI INDUSTRIAL AREA BRANCH

TP1, SECTOR-38, NEAR HSIIDC,

SONEPAT, HARYANA-131029

86.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

GANESH NAGAR BRANCH

1/20, NEAR TILAK NAGAR RED

LIGHT,

NEW DELHI-110019

87.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

MIANWALI NAGAR BRANCH

9 PASCHIM ENCLAVE,

NEW DELHI-110087

88.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

WEST AVENUE PANJABI BAGH

BRANCH

2/52, PANJABI BAGH,

WEST AVENUE,

NEW DELHI-110026

89.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

PUSHPANJALI ENCLAVE BRANCH

B-96, PUSHPANJALI ENCLAVE,

NEW DELHI-110034

90.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

J-BLOCK RAJOURI GARDEN

BRANCH

J 9/34 RAJOURI GARDEN,

NEW DELHI-110027

91.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

MAYA ENCLAVE MAYAPURI

BRANCH

D-2/D-3, MAYAPURI PHASE-II,

OPPOSITE RED LIGHT,

MAYA ENCLAVE,

NEW DELHI-110064

92.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

NAHRI SONEPAT BRANCH

VILLAGE & POST-NAHRI SONEPAT

HARYANA-131003

93.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SECTOR 14, SONEPAT BRANCH

PLOT NO 1,2

T.P. SCHEME SONEPAT

HARYANA-131001

94.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

MINI SECRETARIATE SONEPAT

BRANCH NEW D.C. BUILDING,

GOHANA ROAD,

SONEPAT HARYANA-131001

2992 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

95.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

RAJPUTANA RIFLES BRANCH

GOVT OF INDIA M/O DFENCE,

RAJPUTANARIF, NEW DELHI-110010

96.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SAIDPUR BRANCH

VILLAGE AND POST SAIDPUR,

SONEPAT, HARYANA-131402

97.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

MOHANA (DISTT-SONEPAT)

BRANCH

VILL & POST:MOHANA,

SONEPAT HARYANA-131001

98.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

ALIPUR DELHI BRANCH

240 NEHRU ENCLAVE,

NEW DELHI-110036

99.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

RAJDHANI ENCLAVE

PITAMPURA BRANCH

PLOT NO. 2, ROAD 44,

PITAMPURA.

NEW DELHI-110034

100.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SHANKAR VIHAR BRANCH

IHQ MOD(ARMY) CA,

RAO TULA RAM MARG,

NEW DELHI-110010

101.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SECTOR 8 DEEPALI CHOWK

BRANCH

PLOT NO 9, POCKET-A1,

SECTOR 8 (NEAR DEEPALI CHOWK)

ROHINI NEW DELHI-110085

102.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SBI INTOUCH GURU GOBIND SINGH

MARG BRANCH

BH 7 SHALIMAR BAGH EAST,

DELHI-110088

103

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SBI INTOUCH SHIVAJI ENCLAVE

BRANCH

GN-3, SHIVAJI ENCLAVE,

NEW DELHI-110027

104.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SHALIMAR BAGH DELHI BRANCH

AL BLOCK , DDA SHOPPING

COMPLEX, SHALIMARBAGH,

DELHI-110052

105.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

ROHINI BRANCH

BLOCK NO E-2/25,

GROUND FLOOR, SECTOR-7,

NEW DELHI-110085

106.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

MSME BRANCH

1st FLOOR, AGGARWALCHETAN

PLAZA ,

PLOT NO 1, 2,

LOCAL SHOPING CENTRE,

POCKET 2, SECTOR A9, NARELA,

DELHI-110040

107.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

TIKRI KHURD BRANCH

JATON WALI GALI,

NEAR RATION QUOTA OFFICE,

TIKRI KHURD,

NEW DELHI-110040

108.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

VISHAL ENCLAVE BRANCH

A-30, VISHAL ENCLAVE,

NEW DELHI-110027

109.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SECTOR-14 ROHINI NEW DELHI

SECTOR 14 EXTN,

NEW DELHI-110085

110.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

NIE PHASE -1 BRANCH

1ST FLOOR,

NARAINA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE

PHASE 1, DISTT NEW DELHI-110028

111.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

MCB LAWRENCE ROAD BRANCH

COMMUNITY CENTRE,

LAWRENCE ROAD DISTT.

DELHI-110035

112.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

RAILWAY ROAD SONEPAT BRANCH

RAILWAY ROAD,

SONEPAT, HARYANA-131001

113.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SECT-5 ROHINI BRANCH

ROHINI, DELHI-110085

114.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

DAV SCHOOL CAMPUS BRANCH

DARBARI LAL,

DAV SCHOOL, BN BLOCK,

SHALIMAR BAGH,

DELHI-110088

115.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

GMV COLLEGE BRANCH

MURTHAL ROAD,

GVM GIRLS COLLEGE,

SONEPAT,

HARYANA-131001

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

2993

116.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

NATIONAL MARKET BRANCH

PASCHIM ENCLAVE

PLOT NO 2 & 3,

LOCAL SHOPPING COMPLEX,

BLOCK F, 1ST FLOOR

OPPOSITE NATIONAL MARKET,

PASCHIM ENCLAVE, DELHI-110087

117.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

GOHANA BRANCH

BARODA ROAD,

DISTT. SONEPAT,

HARYANA-131301

118.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

G.T. ROAD MURTHAL BRANCH

GT ROAD DIST-SONEPAT,

HARYANA-131027

119.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

MODEL TOWN SONEPAT BRANCH

NEAR OLD COURTS, ROHTAK ROAD,

SONEPAT, HARYANA-131001

120.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SME KUNDLI BRANCH

JANTI ROAD, KUNDLI,

SONEPAT,HARYANA-131028

121.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

POOTH KALAN BRANCH

BLOCK KANJAHWALA POOTH

KALAN, NEW DELHI-110041

122.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

KARALA BRANCH

STATE BANK OF INDIA,

KARALA, NEW DELHI-110081

123.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

RAMA MARKET BRANCH

PITAMPURA

NEW DELHI-110034

124.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

BADMALIK BRANCH

PO-PS RAI , SONEPAT,

HARYANA-131029

125.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

JJAGSI BRANCH

AGSI, TEHSIL-GOHANA,

DISTT-SONEPAT,

HARYANA-124319

126.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

NEW DELHI JOUNTI BLOCK BRANCH

JOUNTI VILLAGE,

NEW DELHI-110081

127.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

GHARWAL BRANCH

VPO-GHARWAL,

DISTT-SONEPAT,

HARYANA-131030

128.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SONEPAT MINI SECTT BRANCH

MINI SECRETARIAT,

SONIPAT, HARYANA-131001

129.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

Y.S. MODEL SCHOOL BRANCH

PHASE I, BUDH VIHAR,

NEW DELHI-110086

130.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

ROHINI BRANCH

CSC-II, SECTOR-13,

DDA MARKET, FIRST FLOOR,

ROHINI, DELHI-110034

131.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

GANNAUR BRANCH

CHOTIMANDI,

RYL. RD.GANAUR,

SONEPAT, HARYANA-131101

132.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

RACPC, NARAINA INDUSTRIAL

AREA BRANCH

DELHI59, COMMUNITY CENTRE,

NARAINA INDUSTRIAL AREA,

NEW DELHI-110028

133.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

DELHI NARELA BRANCH

D160D160, 1ST FLOOR,

FC-IV,DSIDC INDUSTRIAL

COMPLEX,

NARELA, DELHI-110001

134.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

GOHANA (AM) BRANCH

ANAJ MANDI, GOHANA,

SONEPAT, HARYANA-136128

135.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

ASHOK VIHAR BRANCH

SHAKTI NAGAR EXTENSION,

ASHOK VIHAR, PHASE 3,

NEW DELHI -110052

136.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

HASTSAL AREA BRANCH

VIKASPURI (HASTAL AREA),

NEW DELHI-110018

137.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SARAGTHAL BRANCH

H.NO.577, PWD ROAD,

VILL & POST-SARAGTHAL,

DISTT-SONIPAT,

HARYANA-131305

2994 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

138.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

GOHANA MINI SECTT BRANCH

NEW BUILDING,

SONEPAT ROAD GOHANA,

HARYANA-131301

139.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

NANGLOI JAT BRANCH

K-61, ADHYAPAK NAGAR,

MAIN NAJAFGARH ROAD,

NEAR NARAIN DHARAMKANTA,

NANGLOI,

NEW DELHI-110041

140.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

EAST PUNJABI BAGH BRANCH

28/12, EAST PANJABI BAGH,

NEW DELHI-110026

141.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SECTOR 8 R.C. COMPLEX ROHINI

BRANCH P.B. NO.10005, BALAJI

PLAZA,

SECTOR-8, ROHINI,

DELHI-110085

142.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

WAZIRPUR, DELHI BRANCH

R G CITY CENTRE BLOCK

B LSC LAWRENCE ROAD,

DELHI-110035

143.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

AVTAR ENCLAVE

PASCHIM VIHAR BRANCH

PLOT NO.182,

AVTAR ENCLAVE,

PACHIM VIHAR,

NEW DELHI-110063

नई दिल्ली, 5 अक् तूबर, 2020

का.आ. 1051.—केंद्रीय सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम, 1976

(1927 में य ा संिोजित) के जनयम 10 के उृ जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में भारतीय स्ट् टेट बैंक के सूचीबद्ध िा ाओं को

अजिसूजचत करती िज, जिनके 20% से अजिक कमाचाररयों ने हिंिी का कायासािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जलया िज : -

क्र.सं.

बैंक का नाम

िा ाओं की सं्‍या

1.

भारतीय स्ट् टेट बैंक

32

कुल

32

[फा. सं. 11016/2/2017-हिं.(अजि.)]

रािीव कुमार, सिायक जनिेिक (रािभाषा)

रािभाषा जनयम 10(4) के अंतगात अजिसूजचत कराने के जलए िा ाओं की सूची

1.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

बरृाईगुड़ा िा ा

बरृाईगुड़ा मु्‍य रोड़,

जिला : कोराृुट

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन : 764043

2.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

आंबृुआ िा ा

नषहसंि बालािी जनवास,

आंबृुआ मु्‍य रोड़,

आंबृुआ

जिला : कोराृुट

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन: 7600107

3.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

बज्रकोट िा ा

बालुगााँ

जिला : ृुरी

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन : 752030

4.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

लोछाृड़ा िा ा

लोछाृड़ा रोड़,

ब्रह्मृुर

जिला : गंिाम

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन : 760001

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

2995

5.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

जबषमकटक िा ा

सल्ट कष्‍णा स्ट्रीट, जबषमकटक

जिला : रायगड़ा

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन : 765019

6.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

गुनुृुर बािार िा ा

गांिी ृजब्लक स्ट्कूल के सामने, गुनुृुर

जिला : रायगड़ा

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन : 765022

7.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

रटकीरी िा ा

(यूएआईएल कैंृस)

जिला : रायगड़ा

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन : 765015

8.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

दिगृिंडी िा ा

मु्‍य रोड़, दिगृिंडी

जिला :गंिाम

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन : 761012

9.

भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

कोंकरड़ा िा ा

जिला : गंिाम

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन : 761114

10. भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

एसएमई िा ा

प्र म तल, जमराजनया टावर

गांिी मागा, अनुगुल

जिला: अनुगुल

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन: 759122

11. भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

कुमुसी िा ा

प्लॉट सं्‍या - 2022, ढेंकानाल

जिला: ढेंकानाल

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन: 759019

12. भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

एनटीृीसी (टीटीृीएस) कजम्ृस िा ा

िाउस नंबर-3R/2, सजक्टर-II

टीटीृीएस कजम्ृस, तालचेर

जिला: अनुगुल

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन: 759101

13. भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

ृीबीबी िा ा प्लॉट नंबर- 925

6 वां लेन, अमलाृड़ा

जिला: अनुगुल

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन: 759122

14. भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

स्ट्टेिन बािार िा ा

प्लॉट नंबर. 74/7069

जिवम टावर, प्र म तल,

मजन रोड, ढेंकानाल

जिला: ढेंकानाल

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन: 759013

15. भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

बड़ जत्रजबड़ िा ा

जिला-अनुगुल

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन: 759117

16. भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

ृिमृुर िा ा वाया-राईसुयान

जिला-केंिुझर

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन: 752013

17. भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

सिरृड़ा िा ा

जिला-केंिुझर

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन: 752016

2996 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

18. भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

िुसूरी िा ा

जिला-भद्रक

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन: 756119

19. भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

िामझड़ी िा ा

जिला-बालेश्वर

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन: 756126

20. भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

केंिुआृड़ा िा ा

जिला-भद्रक

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन: 756112

21. भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

नीलजगरर िा ा रािनीलजगरी

जिला-बालेश्वर

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन: 756040

22. भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

रुृसा िा ा

जिला-बालेश्वर

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन: 756022

23. भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

बजलयाृाल िा ा

जिला-बालेश्वर

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन: 756026

24. भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

बस्ट्ता िा ा मजन रोड, बस्ट्ता बािार

जिला-बालेश्वर

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन:756029

25. भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

भूआसुणी िा ा कुसुमबंि

जिला-मयूरभंि

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन: 757092

26. भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

कजप्तृिा िा ा

जिला-मयूरभंि

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन: 757040

27. भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

श्यामा ूंटा िा ा

जिला-मयूरभंि

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन: 757049

28. भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

भूषण स्ट्टील प्लांट िा ा

नरेंद्रृुर, कुसुृंगा, मेरामुंडुली

जिला: ढेंकानाल

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन: 759121

29. भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

बोइंडा िा ा दकिोरगंि

जिला: अनुगुल

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन: 759127

30. भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

जडजमररमुंडा, िा ा

दकिोरनगर, प्रिान कॉम्प्लेक्स,

ृुजलस स्ट्टेिन के सामने

रािदकिोरनगर

जिला: अनुगुल

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन: 759126

31. भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

िमृड़ा िा ा

जिला : केंद्राृड़ा

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन : 754244

32. भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक

सििेव ूंटा िा ा

सििेव ूंटा ृुजलस स्ट्टेिन के सामने

जिला: बालेश्वर

राज्य: ओजडिा

जृन: 756001

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

2997

New Delhi, the 5th October, 2020

S.O. 1051.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official

purposes of the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government, hereby notifies the listed

Branches of State Bank of India, more than 80% of the staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge of

Hindi:-

Serial No.

Name of the Bank

Number of Breanches

1.

State Bank of India

32

Total

32

[F. No. 11016/2/2017-OL(Noti.)]

RAJIV KUMAR, Assistant Director (OL)

LIST OF BRANCHES TO BE NOTIFIED UNDER RULE 10 (4) OF OFFICIAL LANGUAGE

RULE, 1976

1.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

BAIPARIGUDA BRANCH

BAIPARIGUDA MAIN ROAD

DIST : KORAPUT

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 764043

2.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

AMBAPUA BRANCH

NRUSINGHA BALAJI NIWAS

AMBAPUA MAIN ROAD, AMBAPUA

DIST : GANJAM

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 760010

3.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

BAZARKOT BRANCH

VIA BALUGAON

DIST : PURI

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 752030

4.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

LOCHHAPADA BRANCH

LOCHHAPADA ROAD

BERHAMPUR

DIST : GANJAM

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 760001

5.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

BISAMKATAK BRANCH

SALT KRISHNA STREET

BISAMKATAK

DIST : RAYAGADA

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 765019

6.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

GUNUPUR BAZAR BRANCH

IN FRONT OF GANDHI PUBLIC SCHOOL

P.O.GUNUPUR

DIST : RAYAGADA

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 765022

7.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

TIKIRI BRANCH (UAIL CAMPUS)

DIST : RAYAGADA

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 765015

8.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

DIGAPAHANDI BRANCH

MAIN ROAD, DIGAPAHANDI

DIST : GANJAM

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 761012

9.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

KANKARADA BRANCH

DIST : GANJAM

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 761114

10.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SME BRANCH

1ST FLOOR, MEERANEEYA TOWER

GANDHI MARG

DIST : ANGUL

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 759122

11.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

KUMUSI BRANCH

PLOT NO- 8028, DHENKANAL

DIST : DHENKANAL

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 759019

12.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

NTPC (TTPS) CAMPUS BRANCH

HOUSE NO-3R/2, SECTOR-II

TTPS CAMPUS, TALCHER

DIST : ANGUL

2998 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 759101

13.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

PBB BRANCH

PLOT NO. 925, 6TH LINE,

AMALAPADA

DIST : ANGUL

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 759122

14.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

STATION BAZAR BRANCH

PLOT NO. 74/7069, SHIVAM TOWER,

1ST FLOOR, MAIN ROAD

DIST : DHENKANAL

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 759013

15.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

BADA TRIBIDA BRANCH

DIST - ANGUL

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 759117

16.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

PADMAPUR BRANCH

RAISUAN

DIST : KEONJHAR

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 758013

17.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SAHARPARA BRANCH

DIST : KEONJHAR

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 758016

18.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

DHUSURI BRANCH

DIST : BHADRAK

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 756119

19.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

JAMJHADI BRANCH

DIST : BALASORE

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 756126

20.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

KENDUAPADA BRANCH

DIST : BHADRAK

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 756112

21.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

NILAGIRI BRANCH

RAJ NILGIRI

DIST : BALASORE

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 756040

22.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

RUPSA BRANCH

DIST : BALASORE

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 756028

23.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

BALIAPAL BRANCH

DIST : BALASORE

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 756026

24.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

BASTA BRANCH

MAIN ROAD, BASTA BAZAR

DIST : BALASORE

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 756029

25.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

BHUASUNI BRANCH

KUSUMBANDH

DIST : MAYURBHANJ

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 757092

26.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

KAPTIPADA BRANCH

DIST : MAYURBHANJ

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 757040

27.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SHYAMAKHUNTA BRANCH

DIST : MAYURBHANJ

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 757049

28.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

BHUSAN STEEL PLANT BRANCH

NARENDERPUR

KUSUPANGA, MERAMUNDALI

DIST : DHENKANAL

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 759121

29.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

BOINDA BRANCH

KISHOREGANJ,

DIST : ANGUL

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 759127

30.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

DIMIRIMUNDA BRANCH

KISHORENAGAR, PRADHAN COMPLEX,

IN FRONT OF POLICE STATION

RAJKISHORENAGAR

DIST : ANGUL

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 759126

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

2999

31.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

JAMPARA BRANCH

DIST : KENDRAPADA

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 754244

32.

STATE BANK OF INDIA

SAHADEVKHUNTA BRANCH

NEAR P.S. SAHADEVKHUNTA

DIST : BALASORE

STATE: ODISHA

PIN : 756001

नई दिल्ली, 5 अक् तूबर, 2020

का.आ. 1052.—केंद्रीय सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम, 1976

(1927 में य ा संिोजित) के जनयम 10 के उृ जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया के सूचीबद्ध

िा ाओं को अजिसूजचत करती िज, जिनके 20% से अजिक कमाचाररयों ने हिंिी का कायासािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जलया िज

: -

क्र.सं.

बैंक का नाम

िा ाओं की सं्‍या

1.

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

218

कुल

218

[फा. सं. 11016/2/2017-हिं.(अजि.)]

रािीव कुमार, सिायक जनिेिक (रािभाषा)

रािभाषा जनयम 10(4) के अंतगात अजिसूचना िेतु िा ाओं की सूची एवं ृता

1

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

िुल्ल्िृुर िा ा

ग्राम व ृोस्ट्ट िुल्ल्िृुर

तिसील व ब्लॉक ि नीयां

जिला गािीृुर, उत्तर प्रिेि -275202

2

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

बजिलृुर िा ा

ग्राम व ृोस्ट्ट जतवारीृुर

तिसील मोिम्मिाबाि,

जिला गािीृुर

उत्तर प्रिेि -233227

3

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

मकिूमृुर िा ा

ग्राम व ृोस्ट्ट मकिूमृुर

तिसील सजिृुर

जिला गािीृुर

उत्तर प्रिेि - 233307

4

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

िायर िा ा ग्राम व

ृोस्ट्ट िायर ब्लॉक भािौरा

तिसील िमाजनया

जिला गािीृुर -232327

3000 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

5

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

मले ी िा ा

ग्राम मले ी

ृोस्ट्ट िमाागतृुर

जिला गािीृुर

उत्तर प्रिेि 233300

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, रायृुर

6

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

जमड कॉृोरेट िा ा

ग्राउंड फ्लोर,

ऐिवयाा चैंबर

िी ई रोड, रायृुर 492001

7

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

चरोिा िा ा

ब्लॉक नं 8ए, प्लॉट नं. 9,

साउ वसुंिरा नगर,

िी ई रोड जभलाई 3

चरोिा 490025

2

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

मिारािा चौक िा ा

आनंि राि जबहल्डंग,

मिारािा चौक के समीृ

बोरसी रोड आििा नगर

िुगा -491001

9

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

यू एल ृी जभलाई िा ा

ग्राउंड फ्लोर

ब्लॉक नं 37,

वाकोडकर नर्सिंग िोम के समीृ

नेिप नगर वेस्ट्ट,

िुगा, जभलाई -490020

10

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

सीृट िा ा

नेिनल माल ृावर कॉृोरेिन के सामने

जबलासृुर मु्‍य रोड

सीृट, जबलासृुर -495006

11

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

नगरनार िा ा

माकेट रोड से एनएमडीसी गेट की तरफ,

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3001

तिसील नगरनार,

िगिलृुर -494341

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, ियृुर

12

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

िौलृुर िा ा

रािा ेड़ा बाइृास के नििीक

िी टी रोड,

िौलृुर, रािस्ट् ान

13

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

झोटवाड़ा िा ा

रामना ृूरी, कालवाड़ रोड

ियृुर, रािस्ट् ान -302102

14

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

न्यू सांगानेर रोड िा ा

प्लॉट नं 2, जववेक जविार,

न्यू सांगानेर रोड,

ियृुर रािस्ट् ान -302102

15

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

टोंक रोड ियृुर

प्लॉट नं के 7,

इन्कम टजक्स कॉलोनी

टोंक रोड, िुगााृुरा,

ियृुर रािस्ट् ान -302012

16

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

जवद्यािर नगर िा ा

सेंरल स्ट्ृाइन,

ियृुर, रािस्ट् ान

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, ृटना

17

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

जबजियााँ िा ा

सािेब टोला, चौरास्ट्ता रोड, जबजियान

जिला भोिृुर (आरा)

जबिार -202152

18

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

रहुई िा ा

डाकघर रहुई के नििीक

ृोस्ट्ट रहुई, जिला नालंिा,

जबिार 203119

3002 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

19

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

चंिौती िा ा

मगि कॉलोनी, रोड नं 11

फस्ट्टा िाउस, जसकररया मोड के नििीक,

ृोस्ट्ट चंिौती (गया),

जिला गया, जबिार -223001

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, प्रयागराि

20

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

बाबूगंि िा ा

मनकामेश्वर मंदिर के ृास

बाबूगंि बािार

ृोस्ट्ट बाबूगंि, तिसील फूलृुर

21

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

भरवारी िा ा

ृोस्ट्ट भरवारी,

जिला कौिाम्बी,

उत्तर प्रिेि -212021

22

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

मूरतगंि िा ा

िी टी रोड, मूरतगंि

तिसील चायल,

जिला कौिाम्बी,

उत्तर प्रिेि -212021

23

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

वजिा ास िा ा

ृोस्ट्ट िीरृुर (गोृीगंि)

जिला संत रजविास नगर,

उत्तर प्रिेि -221303

24

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

िंकरगढ़ िा ा

राम भवन चौरािा, िंकरगढ़

उत्तरप्रिेि -212102

25

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

जसयारि िा ा

जसयारि मोड,

ग्राम एवं ृोस्ट्ट जसयारि

तिसील भिोिी,

जिला संत रजविास नगर- 221406

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3003

26

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

इटवा उृरवार िा ा

ृोस्ट्ट इटवा उृरवार बाल गोहवंि

ृेरोल ृंृ के सामने

ृोस्ट्ट मिारािगंि -221314

27

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

घुरृुर िा ा

ग्राम एवं ृोस्ट्ट घुरृुर,

तिसील बारा

इलािाबाि -212111

28

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

चुनार िा ा

सद्िुृुर मोिना ृोस्ट्ट चुनार

जिला जमिााृुर,

उत्तर प्रिेि -230304

29

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

िुजल्िृुर िा ा

ृोस्ट्ट ििर ृुर

ब्लॉक एवं तिसील ज्ञानृुर

संत रजविास नगर -221304

30

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

फूलृुर िा ा

कोतवाली रोड,

ृोस्ट्ट एवं तिसील फूलृुर -212402

31

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

्‍यों र िा ा

्‍यों र, बसवाृुर चौरािा

ग्राम ्‍यों र गुवाली ृोस्ट्ट माते ु

ब्लॉक अभोली

तिसील ज्ञानृुर -221404

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, समस्ट्तीृुर

32

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

अरेराि िा ा ,

अरेराि चौक ऑदफस अरेराि,

ृी

-

एस

– अरेराि,

ृूवी चंृारन, जबिार

33

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

अजियाृुर िा ा

3004 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

मााँ सरोि प्लाज़ा,ृोस्ट्ट अजियाृुर ,

मुिफ्फरृुर, जबिार – 842004

34

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

काली स्ट् ान-बेगूसराय िा ा

काजलस्ट् ान चौक,

ृोस्ट्ट-काली स्ट् ान ,

जिला – बेगुसराई ,

जबिार – 851101

35

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

िुरािा जमजसर भोरे िा ा

जमरगंि मेन रोड,

ृोस्ट्ट एवं ृीएस

-

भोरे,

जिला

-

गोृालगंि ,

जबिार – 841426

36

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

गुलाबबाग िा ा

राम मोजिनी चौक,

गुलाबबाग,ृुर्णाया

जबिार – 854326

37

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

घेघटा िा ा

गााँव+ृोस्ट्ट -घेघटा, ाना- छृरा, मुफ़सील, सारण ,

जबिार – 241301

38

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

झंझारृुर िा ा

मीरा कुंि रटबरेवाल लेन,

झंझारृुर रेलवे स्ट्टेिन ,

मिुबनी , जबिार – 847003

39

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

नवगजछया िा ा

ए

.

टी

.

-

मजन

रोड

,

ृोस्ट्ट

-

नवगजछया,ृी

.

एस

.

नवगजछया , भागलृुर ,

जबिार – 853204

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3005

40

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

मजरवा िा ा

जवकास माकेट,

मंझौली चौक मेन रोड,

मजरवा , जसवान ,

जबिार -841239

41

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

माली घाट िा ा

जवकास टावर बीएमृी 6,

िुगाा मंदिर मेन रोड,

मालीघाट , मुिफ्फरृुर ,

जबिार – 842001

42

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

जमज़ााृुर – िरभंगा िा ा

जबभा ृजलेस,जनयर जमज़ााृुर चौक ,

िरभंगा , जबिार – 846004

43

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

रानी सकरृुरा िा ा

भास्ट्कर भवन,

इमली स्ट्टेिन के सामने,

ृो

+

गााँव

– रानीसकरृुरा

ृीएस – गंगौर ,

गजड़या , जबिार - 851204

44

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया,

रामृुर रत्नागर,

बजद्यना ृुर बलकुंडा,

िािीृुर, महुआ रोड,

ृी

.

ओ

-

बीरनल नसेन

,

वजिाली, जबिार – 844125

45

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

लौररया िा ा

एचृीसीएल कजम्ृस,

बगिा रोड मेन रोड,

लौररया , ृजिमी चंृारन ,

जबिार – 845453

3006 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

46

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

जिविर िा ा

वाडा न .15 मजन रोड,ृोस्ट्ट जिविर,

जिविर, जबिार - 243329

47

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

सुगौली िा ा

सुगौली िा ा, स्ट्टेिन चौक,

बस स्ट्टैंड के जनकट, सुगौली,

बेजत्तया, जबिार – 845456

48

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

सूजतिारा राम िा ा

सूजतिारा ृो र,गााँव & ृोस्ट्ट –

सूजतिारा , सीतामढ़ी ,

जबिार – 843331

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, उियृुर

49

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

यूजनयन लोन ृॉइंट िा ा, उियृुर

ृिली मंजिल, हप्रंस प्लाज़ा

झालावाड़ रोड

जवज्ञान नगर कोटा -324005

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, ल नऊ

50

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

अल्लु नगर जडगुररया िा ा

अिालान प्लाज़ा

िरिोई बायृास,

आईआईएम रोड

ल नऊ -226020

51

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

क़जसरगंि िा ा

रानीबाग, क़जसरगंि,

बिराइच -271903

52

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

गोसाईगंि िा ा

तेिाृुर, गोसाईगंि

जिला फजिाबाि -227125

53

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

गौहसंिा िा ा

ग्राम व ृोस्ट्ट मल्लाृुर

जिला गोंडा -271001

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3007

54

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

डाभा सेमर िा ा

कोकाकोला फ़जक्टरी के ृास

फजिाबाि, इलािाबाि बायृास

ग्राम हुसजनगंि,

जिला फजिाबाि -222071

55

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

प्रानृुर िा ा

जचरकुरटया ृीर बाज़ार

बलरामृुर -271201

56

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

जबिनौर िा ा

जबिनौर, ल नऊ -226002

57

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

यूजनयन लोन ृॉइंट, अलीगंि िा ा

िूसरी मंजिल, िारिा टावर,

कृूर ाला कॉम्प्लेक्स

अलीगंि, ल नऊ -226024

52

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

रुिौली िा ा

ृु्‍करृुरम स्ट्टेिन रोड

रुिौली,

जिला फजिाबाि -224140

59

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

सलेमृुर िा ा

प्रकािलोक कालोनी

िारिा अस्ट्ृताल के ृास

मोिान रोड, ल नऊ -227107

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, भोृाल

60

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

िुिालृुर िा ा

ृंचवटी ृररसर

रेलवे स्ट्टेिन गेट, फ्रीगंि

जृन -465333

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, गोर ृुर

61

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

िनी िा ा

िनी बािार, जसकरीगंि रोड

गोर ृुर, उत्तर प्रिेि -271232

3008 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

62

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

नटवा िा ा

अरािी सं्‍या 347

जनयर नटवा चौरािा

बांसृार, बझौली,

जिला मिारािगंि

उत्तर प्रिेि -273306

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, वाराणसी

63

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

क्षेत्र मिाप्रबंिक कायाालय

एस-2/632- ए चंद्रा चैंबसा

सेंरल िेल रोड,

जसकरौल -221002

64

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया,

अलीनगर िा ा,

मकान क्रमांक -32

मुगल चक,

मुगल सराय चंिौली

65

यूजनयन बैंक आफ इंजडया

एकौना िा ा,

ग्राम-एकौना,ृोस्ट्ट –अमाओं

सिबगंि, चंिौली

उत्तर प्रिेि - 232118

66

यूजनयन बैंक आफ इंजडया

गंगाृुर िा ा,

ग्राम-गंगाृुर ृोस्ट्ट –गंगाृुर

वाराणसी उत्तर प्रिेि - 221302

67

यूजनयन बैंक आफ इंजडया

ियाृुर िा ा,

ग्राम-ियाृुर

ृोस्ट्ट –अरािी लाइन

वाराणसी

उत्तर प्रिेि 221109

68

यूजनयन बैंक आफ इंजडया

तेिोृुर िा ा,

ग्राम-तेिोृुर, ृोस्ट्ट–नौबतृुर,

चंिौली उत्तर प्रिेि 232110

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3009

69

यूजनयन बैंक आफ इंजडया

ृलिीृट्टी िा ा,

ग्राम-ृलिीृट्टी , ृोस्ट्ट –भटौली

वाराणसी उत्तर प्रिेि 221208

70

यूजनयन बैंक आफ इंजडया

हृंडरा िा ा,

ग्राम-हृंडरा,

ृोस्ट्ट –हृंडरा

वाराणसी उत्तर प्रिेि -221206

71

यूजनयन बैंक आफ इंजडया

भट्टी िा ा,

अराज़ी क्र.- 1046,

1016, 1047 , 242 ,

भट्टी,वाराणसी

उत्तर प्रिेि -221009

72

यूजनयन बैंक आफ इंजडया

मुनारी िा ा,

ग्राम-मुनारी, ृोस्ट्ट –मुनारी

वाराणसी उत्तर प्रिेि -221008

73

यूजनयन बैंक आफ इंजडया

रामनगर िा ा,

ग्राम-रामनगर, ृोस्ट्ट –रामनगर, वाराणसी

उत्तर प्रिेि -221104

74

यूजनयन बैंक आफ इंजडया

लंका िा ा,

बी-, 17

-

ए

, सरस्ट्वती टोवर,

लंका, वाराणसी,

उत्तर प्रिेि - 221005

75

यूजनयन बैंक आफ इंजडया

सराय ृक्ववान िा ा,

ग्राम-सराय ृकवान , ृोस्ट्ट –संघती

चंिौली उत्तर प्रिेि - 232118

76

यूजनयन बैंक आफ इंजडया

सेवा िा ा, S-5/38-15-117,

3010 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

हवंिवाजसनी नगर, अिाली बाज़ार,

वाराणसी.चंिौली

उत्तर प्रिेि -232118

77

यूजनयन बैंक आफ इंजडया

जसरसी िा ा,

ग्राम माछीिान, ृोस्ट्ट जबसोरी

चंिौली उत्तर प्रिेि -232118

78

यूजनयन बैंक आफ इंजडया

अमरा िा ा,

ग्राम- अमरा ,ृोस्ट्ट- अमरा

चंिौली उत्तर प्रिेि -232105

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, िौनृुर

79

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

िगिीिृुर िा ा

ब्लॉक जसरकोनी, तिसील िौनृुर

जिला िौनृुर -222002

80

यूजनयन बैंक ओफ़फ़ंजडया

ता ाृुरब िा ा

ग्राम ृोस्ट्ट, ता ाृुरब,

ब्लॉक व तिसील िािगंि,

जिला िौनृुर,

उत्तर प्रिेि -223101

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, दिल्ली िजक्षण

81

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

उद्योग नगर िा ा

आई-12, डीएसआईडीसी इंडजस्ट्रयल काम्प्लेक्स ,

उद्योग नगर मेरो स्ट्टेिन के सामने,

उद्योग नगर ृोस्ट्ट नांगलोई, जडजस्ट्रक्ट दिल्ली

न्यू दिल्ली -110041

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, दिल्ली उत्तर

82

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

गौर जसटी िा ा

िॉृ न. 8,9,10,11,12,

सजक्टर 16 सी,

िेकेिी ृाम कोटा, गौर जसटी

83

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

नोएडा सेक्टर 51 िा ा

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3011

िमाा मार्काट िॉृ नो . 1&2,

जनयर रेड लाइट,

सेक्टर -51 नॉएडा,

गौतम बुद्ध नगर

84

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

नोएडा सेक्टर 143 िा ा

िॉृ न 138,139,140,141,142,

एकेबाना गली, गुलिन एकेबाना,

प्लॉट न GH-03/A,

सजक्टर 143 नोएडा

85

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

मयूर जविार फेि थ्री िा ा

अग्रवाल कोंडली प्लािा प्लाट नंबर 7,

जमक्स्ट्ड िाउहसंग स्ट्कीम एल एस सी १ ,

कोंडली

मयूर जविार -थ्री, दिल्ली

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, करनाल

86

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

नरवाना िा ा

दिलीृ चंि माकेट ,

अृोलो चौक के सामने

रेलवे रोड, नरवाना जिला,

जिला िीन्ि,

िररयाणा -126416

87

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

नारनौल िा ा

सजनी एन्क्लेव, बस स्ट्टैंड के ृास

नारनौल, जिला मिेंद्रगढ़

िररयाणा -123001

88

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

बावल िा ा

बनीृुर चौक, ियृुर रोड, बावल

ृोस्ट्ट बावल,

जिला रेवाड़ी,

िररयाणा -123501

89

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

र ौिा िा ा

3012 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

वाडा नंबर 9, दिल्ली रोड

सब्िी मंडी के जनकट,

र ौिा, सोनीृत,

िररयाणा -131402

90

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

हुडा सोनीृत िा ा

सेक्टर 14,

हुडा कॉम्प्लेक्स,

दिल्ली रोड

जिला सोनीृत,

िररयाणा -131001

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, रांची

91

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया,

टंडवा िा ा,

ग्राम- टंडवा, डाकघर- टंडवा

जिला - चतरा, झार ण्ड

जृन – 225321

92

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया,

रसोइया िमना िा ा ,

ग्राम + ृोस्ट्ट - रसोइया िमना

िुगाा मंदिर के ृास,

जिला – ििारीबाग ,

झार ंड -225405

93

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया,

ृाण्डु िा ा

ग्राम + ृोस्ट्ट - ृाण्डु, ब्लॉक – ृाण्डु, जिला –

ृलामू,

झार ंड ,जृन - 222124

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, कोल्िाृुर

94

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया ,

अिलकोट िा ा

3/2814/ िोंगडे काम्प्लेक्स ,

एस टी स्ट्टैंड, स्ट्टेिन रोड

ृो अिलकोट ,

जडजस्ट्रक्ट सोलाृुर ,

मिाराष्ट्र -413216

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3013

95

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

फलटण िा ा

जिवािी नगर, ररंग रोड

वाई सी कॉलेि के सामने,

प्लॉट नं 3320/1, फलटण, सतारा

मिाराष्ट्र -415523

96

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

वाई िा ा

लक्ष्मी िॉल 132/2 ए,

सोंगीरवाड़ी

वाई, तालुका वाई

सातारा,

मिाराष्ट्र -415415

97

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

जिरवल िा ा

वास्ट्मती जबहल्डंग,

िाििीत चौक

एस टी स्ट्टैंड जिरवल,

सतारा मिाराष्ट्र -415415

98

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

यूएलृी सोलाृुर

िरि चैंबसा, 560/59,

साउ सिर बाज़ार, कैंृ सोलाृुर

मिाराष्ट्र -413003

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, अिमिाबाि

99

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

सीएमएस, अिमिाबाि

प्र म तल, सीएमएस, सेवा िा ा,

कागो मोटर के सामने,

सीिी रोड, जिला अिमिाबाि

गुिरात -320006

100

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

जमड कॉृोरेट िा ा

भूतल, प्रेमचंि िाउस

172/1, आश्रम रोड

अिमिाबाि, गुिरात -320009

3014 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, मुंबई िजक्षण

101

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

कफ ृरेड िा ा

625 िी डी सोमानी मेमोररयल स्ट्कूल

िी डी सोमानी मागा, कफ ृरेड,

मुंबई -400 005

102

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

लालबाग िा ा

िॉृ नं 1,2 एवं 3, अनंत अृाटामेंट

मेघवाडी, डॉ एस एस राव रोड

लालबाग, मुंबई -400 012

103

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

लोअर ृरेल िा ा

यिवंत भवन, भूतल

िीृक टॉकीि, ृांडुरंग बुिकर मागा

लोअर ृरेल,

मुंबई -400 013

104

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

वडाला ृजिम िा ा

वडाला टेलीफोन एक्सचेंि ृररसर क्र 2

भूतल, िी डी आंबेडकर रोड

नायगांव वडाला (ृजिम),

मुंबई -400019

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, ृुणे

105

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

ओतूर िा ा,

ओंकर िाइर्टस, ब्रिमनवाड़ा रोड,,

ग्राम ृंचायत जमलकत नंबर 4152,

ृोस्ट्ट ओतूर,

तालुका िुन्नर ृुणे,

मिाराष्ट्र-412409

106

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

कुरुली िा ा

समषजध् ि जबहल् डंग, िा. क्र.1945,

गेट नं. 07, मु.ृो. कुरुली, तालुका ेड,

जि. ृुणे, मिाराष्ट्र

जृन -410501

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3015

107

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

कान्िेसार िा ा

िॉृ क्र 6,7 व 8

अृर ग्राउंड फ्लोर,

कामर्िायल काम्प्लेक्स,

ेड ृबाल रोड,

ृुणे, जृन – 410505

108

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

राड़ी िा ा

िुकान न 3,

अरीसा एवेन्यू,

कोल्ते ृाटील डाऊनटाउन,

राड़ी, ृुणे,

मिाराष्ट्र-411014

109

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

डीएसके जवश्व िा ा

6, वसुिा, डीएसके जवश्व िायरी,

ृुणे

मिाराष्ट्र-411041

110

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

ृुणे ररटेल आजस्ट्त-ृुणे कैंृ

2 ए, अरोरा टावसा 9,

मोलेदिना रोड,

ृुणे कजम्ृ,

जि.ृुणे ,

मिाराष्ट्र,

जृन - 411 001.

111

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

बालेवाड़ी िा ा

िॉृ क्र 1व 2,

श्री रेसीडेंसी ,

एस क्र 6/5/2,

बानेर - बालेवाड़ी रोड,

बालेवाड़ी, बाणेर,

ृुणे, मिाराष्ट्र- 411045

3016 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

112

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

जमड कॉृोरेट िा ा

285, ताराबाघ सोसाईटी,

कोरेगााँव ृाका,

ृुणे मिाराष्ट्र – 411001

संृका : 020-26130089

113

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

यू एल ृी अिमिनगर

फरित टावर, प्लॉट नंबर 2,

ृुणे औरंगाबाि रास्ट्ता,

स्ट्टेिन रोड अिमिनगर ृुणे,

मिाराष्ट्र- 414001

114

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

सेवा िा ा ृुणे

ृीएमटी जबहल्डंग, स्ट्वारगेट,

ृुणे मिाराष्ट्र-411042

115

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

हसंिगढ़ रोड िा ा

प्लॉट क्र 41 िनलक्ष्मी सोसाइटी,

17/3 ऑफ हसंिगढ़ रोड

जिला ृुणे मिाराष्ट्र,

जिला ृुणे,

मिाराष्ट्र - 411 051

116

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

अंचलीय ले ा ृरीक्षा कायाालय

ृरवानी एस्ट्टेट, 229/3 िे. एन रोड,

भेवनी ृे , ृीबी नंबर-1602, ृुणे,

मिाराष्ट्र-411042

117

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

कोरेगांव ृाका िा ा

ताराबाग सोसाइटी,

कोरेगांव ृाका,ृुणे,

मिाराष्ट्र,जिला ृुणे,

मिाराष्ट्र - 411 001

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3017

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, चंडीगढ़

118

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

भटौली िा ा

गांव व डाक अिोली,

एसवीएसडी कॉलेि

जिमाचल प्रिेि

119

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

नारायणगढ़ िा ा

जमनी सजचवालय के सामने

चंडीगढ़ नािन रोड, नारायणगढ़

जिला अंबाला, िररयाणा

120

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

ृालमृुर िा ा

गीतांिली कॉम्प्लेक्स मेन बाज़ार

स्ट्टेट बैंक के नििीक

ृालमृुर, कांगरा जिला

जिमाचल प्रिेि -176061

121

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

डबवाली िा ा

गांिी चौक, ृुरानी अनाि मंडी,

मंडी डबवाली,

जिला जसरसा, िररयाणा

122

यूजनयन बैंक ओफ़फ़ंजडया

गग्गल िा ा

िमािाला रोड

गग्गल गााँव

123

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

चंिेड़कलां िा ा

गााँव व जिला चंिेड़कलां

तिसील टोिाना

फतेिाबाि िररयाणा

124

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

िीवाना िा ा

गााँव व ृोस्ट्ट िीवाना, उृ-तिसील िा ल

तिसील टोिाना

जिला फतेिाबाि

125

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

बरवाला ृंचकुला िा ा

बंसल कॉम्प्लेक्स

बरवाला ृंचकुला

3018 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, िालंिर

126

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

िारीवाल िा ा

िी टी रोड,

नये बस स्ट्टैंड के ृास

िारीवाल,

जिला गुरिासृुर,

ृंिाब -143519

127

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

कलानौर िा ा

ग्राम ृोस्ट्ट कलानौर

ृंिाब नेिनल बैंक के सामने,

बटाला रोड,

जिला गुरिासृुर,

ृंिाब -143512

128

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

ृट्टी िा ा

जमल्क जचहलंग सेंटर के ृास, वाडा नं. 2 मेन रोड,

ृट्टी तरण रोड

ृंिाब -143416

129

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

एसएसआई िालंिर िा ा

एम 5 इंडजस्ट्रयल एररया

िालंिर ृंिाब -144004

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, नाजसक

130

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

चालीसगांव िा ा

ग्राउंड फ्लोर,30/ए प्लाट नं. 3

अजभनव स्ट्कूल के समाने

भड़गोंव रोड, चालीसगाव,

चालीसगाव,

131

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

यू एल ृी औरंगाबाि

िॉृ क़ 3-4 कौस्ट्तुभ प्लाज़ा,

प्लॉट क़ 219 सम ा नगर,

औरंगाबाि

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, मुंबई (ृजिम)

132

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

जवरार ृूवा िा ा

िॉृ न. 1, 2 & 3,

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3019

चोरगे टावसा, फूलृाड़ा रोड, जवरार ृूवा,

जिला- ाणे -401303

133

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

जसप्ज़ मुंबई ओवरसीि िा ा

भूतल, यूजनट न. 007,

ब्लॉक न. 2,

सीप्ज़, कॉम्प्लेक्स,

िोगेश्वरी- जवक्रोली हलंक रोड,

मरोल अद्योजगक क्षेत्र, अंिेरी (ृू),

मुंबई - 400096

134

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

ििानु िा ा

सं े बंगलो, अंबवािी, ईरानी रोड

ृोस्ट्ट- ििानु रोड,

उृमंडल – ििानु

जिला- ाणे ,

मिाराष्ट्र – 401602

135

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

यारी रोड िा ा

सा ाक िाइर्टस

जप्रयििानी सीएचएस जलमेटेड,

िालीमार बेकरी लेन,

ऑृोजिट- सीडबल्यूसी स्ट्कूल,

वसोवा, अंिेरी ृजिम - 400061

136

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

हलंक रोड िा ा

िॉृ न. 1,2,3,4

अग्रवाल इंदफजनटी िाइर्टस,

सीटीएस न. 149/बी,

ऑरलेम, मावे रोड,

ऑफ हलंक रोड,

मालाड ृजिम

– 400064

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, जत्रवेन्द्रम

137

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

एडमूलिल िा ा

कोजडयाडू भवन

3020 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

जनयर ृोस्ट्ट ऑदफस, अयूर

कोल्लम -691533

138

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

दकजलमनूर िा ा

एस प्लाज़ा, एम सी रोड,

दकजलमनूर

केरल -695601

139

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

चावडा िा ा

नंिनन जबहल्डंग नं 17/1095

चावडा ृंचायत कायाालय के सामने

कोल्लम, केरल -691523

140

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

जतरुमला िा ा

िृा जवलास

मांगि जतरुमला, ृी ओ जत्रवेन्द्रम

केरल -695006

141

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

नलनजचरा िा ा

जबहल्डंग नं केृी III/230

नलनजचरा, ृीओ कुरुषादि िंक्िन

नलनजचरा जतरुवन्तृुरम

केरल -695015

142

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

ृनचमुडु-वेल्लरिा िा ा

कषृा ृजलेस,

केएसआरटीसी बस स्ट्टैंड के सामने

वेल्लारिा, ृीओ केरल -695505

143

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

ृॉलीमुक्कु िा ा

एसएस टावर, मिन नाड़ा

ृाजलमुक्कु , ृीओ कोल्लम

जडजस्ट्रक्ट केरल -695501

144

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

बलरामृुरम िा ा

कष्‍ण, एनएच रोड

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3021

बलरामृुरम

जत्रवेन्द्रम, केरल -695501

145

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

वट्टीयूरकावू िा ा

टी सी 6/404-1,

रुजक्मणी आकेड

जतरुवन्तृुरम,जिला,

केरल -695013

146

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

वेंमोंय िा ा

सेंट मजररस आ ोडॉक्स चचा

वेंमोंय ृीओ चेंगन्नूर,

केरल -629509.

147

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

जवहषंिम िा ा

जमनी मंदिरम

ृुल्लूकोणाम, जवहषंिम,

ृी ओ जत्रवेन्द्रम

केरल -695521

148

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

कुण्डरा कोल्लम िा ा

ृु्‍ृमंगलम भवन,

एन िच 208

(क्यूएस रोड़),

कुण्डरा ृी.ओ., कोल्लम जिला,

केरल -691501

149

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

कलवूर िा ा

जछलोरा भवन, कलवुर उत्तर िंक्िन

एनएच 47, आलप्ृुषा, कलवूर

केरल -690521

150

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

कायम्कुलम िा ा

भवन सं्‍या 30/2032,

िषाा ृयाटन भवन,

आचाािेवी, ृुज यडम,

3022 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कायम्कुलम, आलप्ृी जिला,

केरल -690502

151

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

कोजडअर िा ा

आििा टी सी

4/927(1), 4/927(2), जत्रवेन्द्रम,

केरल -695003

152

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

तजकाड िा ा

गंगोत्री जबहल्डंग, एयर रोड,

तजकाड, जतरुवनन्तृुरम

केरल -695014

153

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

जतरुवनन्तृुरम ररटेल असेट िा ा

यूजनयन बैंक भवन एम िी रोड,

स्ट्टेचू िंक्िन

जतरुवनन्तृुरम (जत्रवेन्द्रम)

केरल -695001

154

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

नेडुमंगाड़ िा ा

सरस्ट्वती कॉम्प्लेक्स

नेडुमंगाड़, जतरुवनन्तृुरम

जिला, केरल -695541

155

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

नेय्यारट्टंकारा िा ा

एस एन डी ृी नेय्यारट्टंकारा

यूजनयन जबहल्डंग,

नेय्यारट्टंकारा ृोस्ट्ट ऑदफस

जत्रवेन्द्रम, केरल -695121

156

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

ृुिप्ृुरा िा ा

जिवानी मीनारम,

कॉृोरेिन मंडी के सामने,

ृुिप्ृुरा

जतरुवनन्तृुरम,

केरल -695012

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3023

157

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

ृ नाृुरम िा ा

प्लाजवलइल भवन, मेन रोड कोल्लम जिला

ृ नाृुरम

केरल -629695

158

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

ृुनलूर िा ा

सारा िॉहृंग कॉम्प्लेक्स

टी बी िंक्िन

वालकोड ृो ओ ृुनलूर-ृ नाृुरम रोड

कोल्लम जिला, केरल -690331

159

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

ृोतनकोड िा ा

एल्लाबीं टावसा,

सेक्टर क्र 472/13,

ृो नकोड-मंगलृुरम रोड

जतरुवनन्तृुरम

जिला-केरल -695524

160

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

मणकाड िा ा

केृीएन प्लाज़ा

मणकाड िंक्िन,

जतरुवनन्त्ृुरम,

केरल -695009

161

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

मानार िा ा

भवन सं्‍या 944/4,

लक्ष्मी भवन,

कुरट्टीसेरी, मानार

ृी ओ अलजप्ृ जिला,

केरल -629622

162

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

मावेजलकारा कुरुजतयाड िा ा

के आर यू एम भवन

ेिाकारा ृी ओ

आल्लजृ जिला,

मावेलीकारा,

केरल -690107

3024 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

163

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

वत्ताृारा करकुलम िा ा

लक्ष्मी िॉहृंग मॉल

वत्ताृारा ृी ओ

जत्रवेन्द्रम, केरल -695022

164

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

वकाला िा ा

ृीवीएम भवन,

टेंृल रोड वकाला ृी ओ

जतरुवनन्तृुरम जिला

मजिानाम, केरल -695141

165

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

वजलयामला िा ा , जचत्रा,

भारतीय अंतररक्ष जवज्ञान एवं प्रौद्योजगकी

संस्ट् ान,

प्रोद्योजगकी कजम्ृस वजलयामला नेडुमंगाड़

जतरुवनन्तृुरम जिला,

केरल -695547

166

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

जश्रकारीयम िा ा मणिांजत भवन,

जश्रकारीयम आकुलन रोड

जतरुवनन्तृुरम

जिला केरल -695017

167

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

सेवा िा ा जतरुवनन्तृुरम

िूसरी मंजिल, यूजनयन बैंक भवन

ृो बॉक्स क्र 307, एम िी रोड, स्ट्टेचू िंक्िन,

जतरुवनन्तृुरम जिला

केरल -695001

168

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

िररप्ृाड िा ा

रेतनममा टावसा,

एन एच 47,

सरकारी अस्ट्ृताल के ृास

िररप्ृाड, केरल -690514

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, जविा ाृट्टनम

169

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

सृावरम िंक्िन िा ा

प्र म तल, डी नं 10/134,

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3025

जृ ाृुरम रोड

श्री िनुमान मंदिर के जनकट,

सृावरम िंक्िन

काकीनाड़ा 530005,

आंध्रा प्रिेि

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, चेन्नई

170

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

ृोटा ब्लेयर िा ा

10, गांिी भवन,

अबेरिीन बािार,

ृोटा ब्लेयर

जिला अंडमान,

अंडमान जनकोबार द्वीृ समूि

जृन -744101

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, भुवनेश्वर

171

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया,

आ गढ़ िा ा

लॉ कॉलेि रोड,

ब्लॉक कॉलोनी,

आ गढ़

172

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया,

ओड़ागांव िा ा

टेम्ृल रोड ओड़ागांव, नयागढ़,

173

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया,

कुंिबनगढ़-िसृला िा ा

गोृीना माकेट कॉम्प्लेक्स,

प्लॉट नं. – 2324/3053,

िुगाा बािार,

िसृला ब्लॉक के ृास

174

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया,

कामाक्ष्यानगर िा ा

श्रीराम रेजसडेंसी, वाडा नंबर - 6,

कामाक्ष्यानगर

175

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया,

गोृालृुर िा ा

ृत् रा छक,

बािािुरृेटा,

बरिमृुर- 760007

3026 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

176

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया,

चंडीछक िा ा

नया बाज़ार छक, ृारािीृ रोड़

कटक- 753004

177

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया,

चावजलयागंि िा ा

नया बाज़ार छक, ृारािीृ रोड़

कटक- 753004

178

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया,

ियरामृुर िा ा

ियरामृुर ृंचायत ऑदफस,

भोगराई,

बालासोर - 756032

179

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया,

िलेश्वर िा ा

बड़ा बािार, िलेश्वर

बालेश्वर -756032

180

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया,

िािृुर रोड िा ा

चोरिा रोड,िािृुर रोड,

जिला-िािृुर,

उड़ीसा- 755019

181

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया,

तालचर िा ा

वाडा न॰ 12, िांजडिुआ छक

तालचर, अंगुल – 759100

182

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया,

नारायणृुर िा ा

जनयर श्रीरामृुर ग्राम ृंचायत

श्रीरामृुर,लक्षमीना ,राइबजनया,

बालासोर- 756032

183

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया,

ृट्टामुंडइा िा ा

बस स्ट्टजड के ृास

गिानना माकेट कॉम्प्लेक्स,

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3027

ृट्टामुंडइा,

केन्द्रृाडा- 754215

184

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया,

बालीचन्द्रृुर िा ा

ृोस्ट्ट ऑदफस बालीचंद्रृुर,

ृतारािृुर के ृास,

जिला िािृुर – 754205

185

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया,

बासुिेवृुर िा ा

ृोस्ट्ट ऑदफस रोड बासुिेवृुर,

भद्रक,

ओजडिा – 756162

186

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

भंिनगर िा ा

सरकारी अस्ट्ृताल के सामने,

भंिनगर

जिला- गंिाम,

ओड़ीिा-761 126.

187

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

मंगलृुर िा ा

ृोस्ट्ट ऑदफस मंगलृुर,

कजणकाृाड़ा के ृास,

जिला िािृुर,

ओड़ीिा- 754205

188

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

मकात नगर िा ा

एबीआईटी कजम्प्स सेक्टर-1,

सीडीए,

मकात नगर अजभनव जबडानासी, कटक,

ओड़ीिा- 753014

189

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

महुरा िा ा

सी वी रमन

इंिीनीयररंग कॉलेि कजम्ृस, िनला,

जिला - ुिाा, भुवनेश्वर,

ओड़ीिा- 752054

3028 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

190

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

रेमुना-िानुगंि िा ा

गणेश्वरृुर, िानुगंि, बालेश्वर

ओड़ीिा- 756019

191

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

रायरंगृुर िा ा

प्लॉट नंबर - 54/1066,

वाडा नंबर - 9, रायरंगृुर,

ओड़ीिा- 757043

192

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

लुईस रोड िा ा

प्लॉट नंबर 2262,

लूइस रोड, ुिाा,

भुवनेश्वर, ओड़ीिा- 751002

193

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

श्रीकोना िा ा

प्लॉट नं. 3237/6176 (ृी),

श्रीकोना,

िमलेट - जमिााृुर,

ओड़ीिा- 752025

194

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

ििीि नगर िा ा

ओएसृीएच एंड डब्लूएक्स जलजमटेड. कम्ृॉउन्ड,

िनृ ृो. भोईनगर भुवनेश्वर,

जिला : ुिाा ओड़ीिा- 751022

195

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

सत्यबािी साक्षीगोृाल िा ा

एसबीआई के सामने मेन रोड.

ृो. साक्षीगोृाल

जिला :ृुरी

ओड़ीिा- 752014

196

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

हिंजिलीकट िा ा, रजश्म प्लािा,

चौिरी माकेट कांृलजक्स.

मेन रोड हिंजिलकट,

जिला: गंिाम

ओड़ीिा-761 102.

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3029

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, बेलगावी

197

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

गिग िा ा

श्री एस के कबािर जबहल्डंग

एृीएमसी याडा कॉम्प्लेक्स ‘प्रगजत’

एृीएमसी याडा रोड,

ृीओ गडग, जिला गडग,

कनााटक -522101

198

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

गुरजमटकल िा ा

1-5-15, मेन रोड, गुरजमटकल

जिला यािगीर,

कनााटक -525214

199

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

मुिोल कलबुगी िा ा

कोलकुंडा क्रॉस के नििीक,

मुिोल, तालुका सेडम

जिला कलबुगी

कनााटक -525312

200

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

मिान्तेिनगर िा ा

श्री ए बी गोवेकसा जबहल्डंग,

फ़स्ट्टा फ्लोर , अंिनेया नगर, अिोका कॉम्प्लेक्स,

सेक्टर 10 सीटीसी 6531-6534,

ृोस्ट्ट मलमारुजत एमएम एक्सटेंिन

जिला बेलगाम -590016

201

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

यािगीर िा ा

कलबूरगी टावसा,

न्यू जविान िौि के नििीक,

जचत्तृुर रोड,

जिला यािगीर,

कनााटक -525202

202

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

सजडाृुर यािगीर िा ा

प्लॉट नं 73/74,

मिावीर कॉलोनी,

3030 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

यािगीर रोड, सजडाृुर,

जिला यािगीर,

कनााटक -525221

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, बेंगलूरु

203

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

नरासृुरा िा ा

सवे नंबर 294/4, भूतल

बेल्लूर गााँव , नरसाृुरा िोबली,

कोलार -563133, कनााटक

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, कोयंबतूर

204

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

अजवनािी िा ा

15/72 ए-6

भारतीिासन स्ट्रीट,

कोवई मेन रोड, अजवनािी,

जिला कोयंबतूर -641654

205

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

उिगमंडलम िा ा

190/4 िजडफील्ड रोड,

िे एस कॉम्प्लेक्स

ृिली मंजिल, जिलबंक, ऊटी जिला नीलजगररि,

ताजमलनाडु -643001

206

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

ज रुवानाकोजवल िा ा

2 नंबर वी एस नगर

चीनई रंक रोड, ज रुवानाकोजवल

जिला जतरुजचराृल्ली – 621005

207

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

ृीलामेडु िा ा

नं 437 अजवनािी रोड

िांजत ज एटर के सामने,

ृीलामेडु कोयंबतूर -641004

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, कोजझकोड

208

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

जचत्तूर (ृालकाड जिला)

आर के जबहल्डंग,

जचत्तूर ृालिड़

जचत्तूर ृोस्ट्ट ृालिड़

केरल -672101

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3031

209

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

कल्ृेट्टा िा ा

मीनाक्षी कॉम्प्लेक्स,

कल्ृेट्टा ृोस्ट्ट वायनाड

केरला -673121

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, जवियवाड़ा

210

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

भवानीृुरम िा ा

फ्लजट सं 307, भवानी टावसा

स्ट्वाती रोड,

भवानीृुरम कष्‍णा जिला

जवियवाड़ा,

आंध्रा प्रिेि -520012

211

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

कुरुमद्दली िा ा

द्वार क्रमांक 4-111ए

वेिाृुरम रोड

अंिेयना स्ट्वामी मंदिर के ृास

जिला कष्‍णा -521157

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, एणााकुलम

212

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

एडाृल्ली टोल िा ा

टोल िंक्िन

एनएच 47 एडाृल्ली

एणााकुलम केरल -622024

213

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

कड़मकुडी िा ा

मड़जतल ृरमजबल िाउस

जृििला ृोस्ट्ट,

कोचीन -622027

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, जसलीगुड़ी

214

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

सेवक रोड िा ा

रेमबो िाउस (बेसमेंट)

ृोस्ट्ट जसलीगुड़ी,

जिला िार्िाहलंग

ृजिम बंगाल -734001

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, कोट्टायम

215

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय, कोट्टायम

तीसरा माला, अमला टावर,

आड़ेजचरा िंक्िन,

3032 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

तेल्लकम

ृी ओ, कोट्टायम -626016

216

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

एरुमेली िजक्षण िा ा

कल्लुकुलंगरा जबहल्डंग,

अरुमेली मुंडकायम रोड

प्राइवेट बस स्ट्टैंड के ृास,

एरुमेली ृोस्ट्ट कोट्टायम,

केरल -626509

217

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

ेनगना िा ा

आिीजलमूजत्तल कण्णवत्ता,

ृेरुम्बनची, ृोस्ट्ट-चंगनाचेरी

कोट्टायम, केरल -626536

218

यूजनयन बैंक ऑफ इंजडया

सान नृारा िा ा

ृी के आर जबहल्डंग,

ृूप्ृरा ृोस्ट्ट उडुन्बंचोला तालुका

सान नृारा, इडुिी,

केरल -625619

New Delhi, the 5th October, 2020

S.O. 1052.— In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official

purposes of the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987),the Central Government, hereby notifies the listed

Branches of Union Bank Of India, more than 80% of the staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge of

Hindi:-

Serial

No.

Name of the Bank

Number of Branches

1.

Union Bank Of India

218

Total

218

[F. No. 11016/2/2017-OL (Noti.)]

RAJIV KUMAR, Assistant Director (OL)

LIST OF BRANCHES FOR NOTIFICATION UNDER O.L. RULE 10(4)

Regional Office, Ghazipur

1

Union Bank Of India

vill.- Dullahpur Post-Dullahpur,

Block/Tehsil-Jakhania,

Dist-Ghazipur,

Uttar Pradesh Pin-275202

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3033

2

Union Bank of India

AT & PO Tiwaripur, Tehsil

Mohammadabad,

AT & PO Tiwaripur, Tehsil: Mohammadabad,

Uttar Pradesh- 233227

3

Union Bank of India

PO Makhdumpur, S.Dist. Saidpur,

Dist. Ghazipur,

Uttar Pradesh -233307

4

Union Bank of India

Sayer Branch

PO Sayer,

Block Bhadaura, S.

Dist. Zamania,

Uttar Pradesh – 232327

5

Union Bank of India

Village Malethi (Rural),Village

malethi,Po- dharmagathpur,

District- Ghazipur, 233300

Regional Office, Raipur

6

Union Bank of India

Mid Corporate Branch

Ground Floor

Aishwarya Chamber

GE Road,

Raipur -492001

7

Union Bank of India

Charoda branch

Block no. 8A, Plot no. 9,

South Vasundhra Nagar,

G.E. Road,Bhilai 3 Charoda

-490025 Bhilai

8

Union Bank of India

Maharaja chowk Branch

Anand raj bhuilding

Near Maharaja Chowk,

Borsi Road, Adarsh nagar,

Durg- 491001

9

Union Bank of India

ULP Bhilai

Ground Floor, Block no. 37,

Beside Wakodkar Nursing Home,

Nehru Nagar(W),

Bhilai -490020

10

Union Bank of India

Seepat Branch

In Front Of NTPC Material gate,

Bilaspur Main Road Seepat,

Bilaspur -495006

11

Union Bank of India

Nagarnar Branch

Road from Market to NMDC Gate,

Tehsil Nagarnar,

Distt Jagdalpur – 494341

3034 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Regional Office, Jaipur

12

Union Bank of India

Dholpur Branch

Near Raja Khera Byepass

G T Road, Byepass,

Dholpur, Rajasthan

13

Union Bank of India

Jhotwara, Jaipur Branch

Ramnath Puri

Kalwad Road Jaipur

Jaipur, Rajasthan -302102

14

Union Bank of India

New Sanganer Road branch

Plot No 8, Vivek Vihar,

New Sanganer Road

Jaipur, Rajasthan -302102

15

Union Bank of India

Tonk road Shakha

Plot No K-7,

Income Tax Colony

Tonk road, Durgapura

Jaipur, Rajasthan -302018

16

Union bank of India

Vidyadhar Nagar Branch

Central Spine, Jaipur

Rajasthan

Regional Office, Patna

17

Union Bank of India

Bihiya branch

Saheb Tola,

Chaurasta road,

Bihiya dist.Bhojpur (Arrah)

Bihar -802152

18

Union Bank of India

Rahui Branch

Near Rahui Post Office

PO Rahui

Dist.Nalanda,

Bihar -803119

19

Union bank Of India

Chandauti branch

Magadh colony,

Road No. 01,

first house,

Near Sikaria More

PO Chandauti, Dist Gaya

Bihar -823001

Regional Office, Prayagraj

20

Union bank of India

Babuganj Branch

Near mankameshwar Mandir

Babuganj Bazar

PO Babuganj,

Tah- Phoolpur

21

Union Bank of India

Bharvaari Branch

Post Bharwari,

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3035

Dist.Kaushambi

Uttar Pradesh -212201

22

Union Bank of India

Muratganj branch

G.T.Road Mooratganj

Tahsil chall

Dist.Kaushambi

Uttar Pradesh -212201

23

Union Bank of India

Vaidakhas Branch

Post Dheerpur (gopiganj)

Sant ravidas nagar

Uttar Pradesh -221303

24

Union bank of India

Shankargarh branch

Raam Bhavan Chouraha

Shankargarh,

Uttar Pradesh -212108

25

Union Bank of India

Siyaraha Mod

Village and post Siyaraha

Dist Sant Ravidas Nagar

-221406

26

Union Bank of India

Itwa Uparwar Branch

Post Itwa Uparwar

Opposite of Bal Govind Petrl Pump

Post Maharajganj -221314

27

Union Bank of India

Ghurpur Branch

Village & Post Ghurpur

Tahsil BARA,

Prayagraj -212111

28

Union Bank of India

Chunar Branch

Saddupur Mohana

Post Chunar ,

Dist Mirzapur,

Uttar Pradesh -231304

29

Union Bank of India

Dulhipaur Branch

Post Dashrathpur

Block & Tahsil Gyanpur

Sant Ravidas Nagar -221304

30

Union Bank of India

Fulpur Branch

Kotwali Road

Post and Tahsil Fulpur

-212402

31

Union Bank of India

Khyonkhar Branch

Baswapur Chouraha,

3036 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Village Khyonkhar Guwali

Post Matethu Block Abholi

Tahsil Gyanpur- 221404

Regional Office, Samastipur

32

Union Bank Of India

Areraj Branch

At- Areraj Chowk,

Po - Areraj,

Ps - Arearaj ,

East Champaran ,

Bihar – 845411

33

Union Bank of India

Ahiyapur branch

Maa saroz plaza,

Post Ahiyapur ,

Muzaffarpur

Bihar – 842004

34

Union Bank of India

Kali Sthan-Begusarai Branch

Kalisthan Chowk,

Post-Kalisthan,

District-Begusarai,

Bihar – 851101

35

Union Bank of India

Khajuraha Misir Bhore Branch

Mirganj Main Road,

Post A7, Ps-Bhore,

Dist.-Gopalganj ,

Bihar –841426

36

Union Bank of India

Gulabbag branch

Rammohini chowk,

Gulabbag,purnea ,

Bihar – 854326

37

Union Bank of India

Gheghta branch

Village+post- gheghta,

Thana-Chapra,Mufasil,

Saran, Bihar - 841301

38

Union Bank of India,

Meera kunj tibrewal lane,

Jhanjharpur Railway Station ,

Madhubani

Bihar - 847003

39

Union Bank Of India

Naugachhiya Branch

At- Main Road,

Po- Naugachhia,

Ps- Naugachhia ,

Bihar - 853204

40

Union Bank Of India

Mairwa Branch

Vikas Market,

Manjhauli Chowk

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3037

Main Road,

Mairwa , Siwan ,

Bihar – 841239

41

Union Bank of India

Mali ghat branch

Vikas tower bmp 6,

Durga mandir main road,

Malighat , Muzaffarpur ,

Bihar- 842001

42

Union Bank of India

Mirzapur-darbhanga branch

Bibha palace,

Near Mirzapur Chowk ,

Darbhanga ,

Bihar- 846004

43

Union Bank of India

Rani sakarpura branch

Bhaskar bhawan

In Front Of Imli Station,

Po+Vill-Ranisakarpura

Ps- Gangaur ,

Khagaria, Bihar- 851204

44

Union Bank of India,

Rampur Ratnagar,

Baidyanathpur Balkunda,

Hazipur, Mahua Road,

Po- Birnalakhansen ,

Vaishali , Bihar- 844125

45

Union Bank of India

Lauria branch

Hpcl Campus, Bagha Road,

Main Road, Bihar ,

West Champaran – 845453

46

Union Bank of India

Sheohar branch

Ward No 15 Main Road,

Po Seohar, Shivhar ,

Bihar – 843329

47

Union Bank of India –

SUGAULI, Station Chowk,

Near Bus Stand - Sugauli,

Sugauli Bettiah ,

Bihar – 845456

48

Union Bank of India

Sutihara ram branch

Sutihara pokhar,

Village & Post- Sutihara,

Sitamarhi , Bihar – 843331

Regional Office, Udaipur

49

Union Bank of India

Union Loan Point Branch

First Floor, Prince Plaza

Jhalawar Road

Vigyan Nagar; Kota -324005

3038 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Regional Office, Lucknow

50

Union Bank of India

Allu Nagar Deguria Branch

Arshlawn Plaza,

Hardoi Bypass,

IIM Road,

Lucknow -226 020

51

Union Bank Of India

Kaisarganj Branch

Ranibagh, Kaisarganj

Bahraich -271 903

52

Union Bank of India

Gosainganj Branch

Tezapur, Gosainganj

Dist. Faizabad -227125

53

Union Bank of India

Gausinha Branch

Village & Post Mallapur

Dist Gonda 271001

54

Union Bank of India

Dabha Semar Branch

Near Coca Cola Factory,

Faizabad Allahabad Bypass,

Village Husainganj

Dist. Faizabad -222071

55

Union Bank of India

Pranpur Branch

Chirkutiya Peer Bazar

Balrampur -271201

56

Union Bank of India

Bijnaur Branch

Bijnaur,

Lucknow -226002

57

Union Bank of India

Union Loan Point Branch

2nd floor,

Sharda Tower

Kapoorthlaa Complex

Aliganj, Lucknow -226024

58

Union Bank of India

Rudauli Branch

Pushkarpuram,

Station Road

Rudauli Dist.

Faizabad -224120

59

Union Bank of India

Salempur Branch

Prakashlok Colony

Near Sharda Hospital

Mohan Road,

Lucknow -227107

Regional Office, Bhopal

60

Union Bank of India

Shujalpur Branch

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3039

Panchawati kParishar

Near Railway Station Gate

Freeganj -465333

Regional Office, Gorakhpur

61

Union Bank of India

Khajani Branch

Khajani Bazar, Sikariganj Road

Gorakhpur UP -271232

62

Union Bank of India

Natawa Branch

Araji Sankhyaa 347,

Near Natawa Chauraha,

Banspaar, Bajhauli

Dist.Maharajganj,

UP -273306

Regional Office, Varanasi

63

Union Bank of India

Field General Managers Office

S-2/638 A Chandra Chambers

Central Jail Road,

Sikraul -221002

64

Union Bank Of India,

Alinagar Branch,

Survey No. 38,

Mughal Chak

Alinagar Mughalsarai

65

Union Bank Of India,

Ekauna Branch,

Vill-Ekauna,Post-Amaon

Sahabganj Chandauli,

U.P-232118

66

Union Bank Of India,

Gangapur Branch,

Vill-Gangapur,

Post- Gangapur

Varanasi , U.P-221302

67

Union Bank Of India,

Gangapur Branch,

Vill-Jayapur,

Post-Araji line

Varanasi , U.P-221109

68

Union Bank Of India,

Tejopur Branch,

Vill- Tejopur,

Post-Naubatpur

Chandauli , U.P-232110

69

Union Bank Of India,

Palahipatti Branch,

Vill- Palahipatti, Post-Bhatauli

Varanasi , U.P-221208

70

Union Bank Of India,

Pindra Branch,

Branch Code: 577570

Varanasi , U.P-221206

3040 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

71

Union Bank Of India,

Bhatti Branch,

Arazi. No-1046, 1016 , 1047 & 848 ,

Bhatti Varanasi

U.P-221209

72

Union Bank Of India,

Munari Branch,

Branch Code: 573833

Varanasi , U.P-221104

73

Union Bank Of India,

Ramnagar Branch,

Vill- Ramnagar ,

Post-Ramnagar

Varanasi , U.P-221104

74

Union Bank Of India,

Lanka Branch,

B-29/17, 17-a,

Saraswati Tower,,

Lanka

Varanasi , U.P-221104

75

Union Bank Of India,

Sarai Pakvan Branch,

Vill- Sarai Pakvan ,

Post-Sanghati

Chandauli Varanasi ,

U.P-232118

76

Union Bank Of India,

Service Branch,

S-5/38-15-16-17,1stFloor,

Vindhya Vasini Nagar,

Orderly Bazar Varanasi ,

U.P-221002

77

Union Bank Of India,

Sirasi Branch,

Vill- Rampur Machhihan,

Post- Bisori,

Chandauli Varanasi

U.P-232118

78

Union Bank Of India,

Amra Branch,

Vill- AMRA, Post- Amra ,

Chandauli Varanasi ,

U.P-232105

Regional Office, Jaunpur

79

Union Bank of India

Jagdishpur Branch

Block Sirkoni, Tehsil Jaunpur

Dist.Jaunpur

State UP -222022

80

Union Bank of India

Takhapurab Branch

Post Takhaa Purab,

Block tehsil,

Shahganj,

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3041

Dist.Jaunpur

Uttar Pradesh -223101

Regional Office, Delhi (South)

81

Union Bank of India

Udyog Nagar Branch

1-12, DSIDC Indl.Complex,

Nr Udyog Ngr Metro Stn.,

Udyog Nagar,

PO Nangloi, S. Dist. Delhi,

Dist Delhi,

New Delhi -110041

Regional Office, Delhi (North)

82

Union Bank Of India

Gaur City Branch

Shop No. 8,9,10, 11,12,

Sector 16C,

JKG Palm Court,

Gaur City -201009

83

Union Bank Of India

Noida Sector 51 Branch

Sharma Market Shop No. 1&2,

Near Red Light,

Sector -51 Noida,

Gautam Buddha Nagar,

Uttar Pradesh

84

Union Bank Of India

Noida Sector 143 Branch

Shop No. 138, 139, 140, 141, 142,

Ikebana Street,

Gulshan Ikebana,

Plot No. GH-03/A,

Sector 143, Noida 201309,

Uttar Pradesh

85

Union Bank Of India

Mayur Vihar -III

Aggarwal Kondli Plaza,

Plot No-7, Mixed Housing Scheme ,

LSC 1, Kondli, Mayur Vihar -III,

Delhi, Uttar Pradesh

Regional Office, Karnal

86

Union Bank of India

Narwara Branch

Dilip Chand Market,

Near Opollo Chowk,

Railway Road

Narwana, Dist.Jind,

Haryana -126416

87

Union Bank of India

Narnaul Branch

Saini Enclave, Near Bus Stand

Narnaul, Dist. Mahendragarh

Haryana 123001

88

Union Bank of India

Bawal Branch

Banipur Chowk,

Jaipur Road

PO Bawal, Dist.Rewari,

Haryana 123501

3042 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

89

Union Bank of India

Kharkhauda Branch

Near Subzi Mandi

Kharkhauda

Sonipat Haryana 131402

90

Union Bank of India

Huda Sonepat Branch

Sector 14, Huda Complex

Delhi Road,

Dist.Sonepat,

Haryana 123501

Regional Office, Ranchi

91

Union Bank of India,

Tandwa Branch,

Vill+ Post – Tandwa

Near Durga Mandir, District-Chatra, Jharkhand,

PIN – 825321

92

Union Bank Of India,

Rasoia Dhamna Branch

Vill+ Post - Rasoia Dhamna

Near Durga Mandir,

District –Hazaribag,

Jharkhand-825405

93

Union Bank Of India,

Pandu Branch,

Village+Post- Pandu,

Block- Pandu,

District –Palamu,

Jharkhand - 822124

Regional Office, Kolhapur

94

Union Bank of India

Akkalkot Branch

3/2814, Dhongade complex

Near ST Stand, Station road,

Akkalkot, solapur

Maharashtra -413216

95

Union Bank of India

Phaltan Branch,

Shivaji Nagar, Ring Road,

Oppy C College,

Plot No 3320/1

Phaltan, Satara

Maharashtra -415523

96

Union Bank of India

Wai Branch

Laxmi Hall 138/2, A

Songirwadi (Wai)

Taluka Wai, Satara

Maharashtra -415415

97

Union Bank of India

Shirwal Branch

Vasmati Building,

Shahajeet Chouk,

ST Stand Sjhirwal

Satara, Maharashtra -415415

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3043

98

Union Bank of India

ULP Solapur

Sharad Chambers

560/59, South Sadar Bazar Camp

Solapur, Maharashtra -413003

Regional Office, Ahmedabad

99

Union Bank of India

CMS

1st floor,

CMS Service branch

Opp.Cargo Motors,

CG Road,

Dist.Ahmedabad,

Gujrat -380006

100

Union Bank of India

Mid Corporate Branch

Ground Floor,

Premchand House

172/1, Ashram Road

Ahmedabad,

Gujarat -380009

Regional Office, Mumbai South

101

Union Bank of India

Cuffe Pared Branch

625 G D Somani Memorial School

G D Somani Marg,

Cuffe Pared

Mumbai -400 005

102

Union Bank of India

Lalbaug Branch

Shop No.1,2 and 3

Anant Apartment Meghwadi,

Dr S S Rao

Lalbaug Mumbai -400012

103

Union Bank of India

Lower Parel Branch

Yeshwant Bhavan,

Ground Floor

Deepak Talkies,

Pandurang Bhudkar marg,

Lower Parel

Mumbai -400013

104

Union Bank of India

Wadala West Branch

Wadala Telephone Exchange

Premises no. 2, ground floor

G.D.Ambedkar Road,

Naigaon, Wadala (W),

Mumbai -400019

Regional Office, Pune

105

Union Bank of India

Otur Branch

Onkaar Heights

Brahmanwada Road

Gram Panchayat Milkat No.4152

PO Otur, Tal.Junnar,

Pune, Maharashtra -412409

3044 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

106

Union Bank of India

Kuruli Branch

Samrudhi Building,

H No.1945, Gate No 07

At & post Kuruli,

Taluka Khed, Dist.Pune,

Maharashtra -410501

107

Union Bank of India

Kanhesaar Branch

Shop No.6, 7 and 8,

upper ground floor

Commercial Complex,

Khed Pabal Road

Taluka Khed, Dist.Pune,

Maharashtra -410505

108

Union Bank of India

Kharadi Branch

Shop No.3, Arrisa

Avenue Kolte Patil

Downtowan, Kharadi,

Pune, Maharashtra -411014

109

Union Bank of India

DSK vishv Branch

6 Vasudhaa, DSK Vishwa

Dhayari, Pune,

Maharashtra -411041

110

Union Bank of India

Pune Retail Asset – Pune Camp

2-A Arora Towers,

9 moledina Road,

Pune Camp, dist.Pune

Maharashtra -411001

111

Union Bank of India

Balewadi Branch

Shop No 1 & 2 Shree Residency

S No.6/5/2,

Baner Balewadi Road

Dist. Baner, Pune

Maharashtra -411001

112

Union Bank of India

Mid Corporate

1st floor, 285 Tarabaug Society,

Opp.Bund Garden,

Koregaon Park

Pune, Maharashtra -411001

113

Union Bank of India

ULP Ahmednagar

Farhat Tower, Plot No.8

Pune-Aurangabad road,

Station Road, Ahmednagar

Maharashtra

114

Union Bank of India

Service Branch Pune

PMT Building,

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3045

Swargate

Pune-Maharashtra -411051

115

Union Bank of India

Sinhgad Road Branch

Plot No.41,

Dhanlaxmi Soc.Sr.No.16/21

17/3, Off Sinhgad Road

Dist. Pune,

Maharashtra -411051

116

Union Bank of India

Zonal Audit Ofice

Parwani Estate

289/3, J N road,

bhawani Peth

PB No 1602,

Pune-Maharashtra -411042

117

Union Bank of India

Koregaon Park Branch

Tarabaug society

Koregaon Park,

Pune Dist.Pune

Maharashtra -411001

Regional Office, Chandigarh

118

Union Bank of India

Bhatouli Branch

Village & Post Ajouli

SVSD College,

Himachal Pradesh

119

Union Bank of India

Narayangarh Branch

Opp. Mini Secretariat

Near Subhash Chowk,

Chandigarh Nahan Road

Naraingarh,

Dist.Ambala,

Haryana

120

Union Bank of India

Palampur Branch

Geetanjali Complex,

mainBazar, Near SBI

Palampur,dist.Kangra,

Himachal Pradesh -176061

121

Union Bank of India

Dabwali Branch

Gandhi Chowk,

Old Anaj Mandi,

Dabwali, Dist.Sirsa,

Haryana -125104

122

Union Bank of India

Gaggal Branch

Dharamshala Road

Village Gaggal

123

Union Bank of India

Chaderkalan Branch

3046 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Village & Post Chaderkalan

Tahsil Tohana

124

Union Bank of India

Diwana Branch

VPO Diwana

Sub-Tehsil Jakhal,

Tehsil Tohana,

Dist. Fatehabad

125

Union Bank of India

Barwala Panchkula Branch

Bansal Complex

Barwala Panchkula

Regional Office, Jalandhar

126

Union Bank of India

Dhariwal Branch

GT Road, New Bus Stand

Dhariwal,

Dist.Gurdaspur,

Punjab -143519

127

Union Bank of India

Kalanaur Branch

Opp Punjab National Bank,

Batala Road

Dist.Gurdaspur,

Punjab -143512

128

Union Bank of India

Patti Branch

Newar Milk Chilling Centre,

Ward No.2,

Main road

(Patti Taran Road),

Dist.Taran Taran,

Punjab -143416

129

Union Bank of India

SSI Jalandhar Branch

M-5, Industrial Area,

Jalandhar,

Punjab -144004

Regional Office, Nasik

130

Union Bank of India

Chalisgaon Branch

Gr Floor, 30/A,

plot no 3

opp Abhinav School,

Bhadgaon Road ,

Chalisgaon

131

Union Bank of India

ULP Aurangabad

Shop NO 3-4 Kaustubh Plaza,

Plot no 219 Samarth Nagar,

Aurnagabad

Regional Office, Mumbai (West)

132

Union Bank of India

Virar East Branch

Shop no. 1,2 & 3,

Chorge Towers,

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3047

Phulpada Road,

Virar East,

Dist – Thane – 401303

133

Union Bank of India

Seepz Overseas

Ground Floor,

unit No. 007,

Block No. 2,

Seepz, Complex,

Jogeshwari-Vikroli Link Road,

Marol Industrial Area,

Andheri (E),

Mumbai- 400096

134

Union Bank of India

Dahanu Branch

Sankhe Bunglow,

Ambawadi, Irani Road,

PO Dahanu Road,

S-Dist – Dhanau

Dist- Thane

Maharashtra – 401602

135

Union Bank of India

Yaari Road Branch

Sarthak Heights

Priyadarshani CHS LTD.

Shalimar Bakery Lane,

Opp CWC School,

Versova, Andheri

West – 400061

136

Union Bank of India

Link Road, Maarve Branch

Shop No. 1,2,3,4

Agarwal Infinity heights, CTS No. 149/B, Orlem,

Marve Road, Off Link Road,

Malad West - 400064

Regional Office, Trivandrum

137

Union Bank of India

Edamulackal (Ayur) Branch

Kodiyattu Complex,

Anchal road

Kollam -691533

138

Union Bank of India

Kilimnoor Branch

S Plaza M.C.Road

Kilimanoor Junction

Kilimanoor,

Kerala -695601

139

Union Bank of India

Chavra Branch

Nandana Builing,

Building No.17/1095

In front of Chavara Panchayat Office,

Kollam,

Kerala -691583

3048 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

140

Union Bank of India

Thirumala Branch

Japa Vilas, Namgad,

Thirumala

PO Trivandrum,

Kerala -695006

141

Union Bank of India

Nalanchira Branch

Building No. KP III/230,

Nalanchira PO

Near Kurushadi Junction,

Nalanchira, Thiruvanthapuram

Kerala -695015

142

Union Bank of India

Panachamoodu Vellarada Branch

Kripa Palace,

Near KSRTC Bus Stand

Vellarada P O

Kerala -695505

143

Union Bank of India

Pallimukku Branch

Pallimukku Branch

SS Tower, Masdan Nada,

Pallimukku,

PO Kollam,

Dist.Kerala -691014

144

Union Bank of India

Balaramapuram Branch

Krishna, NH Road

Balaramapuram, Trivandrum

Kerala -695501

145

Union Bank of India

Vattiyoorkavu Branch

TC6/404-1, Rukmini Arcade,

Dist. Trivandrum,

Kerala -695013

146

Union Bank of India

Venmony Branch

St.Mary’s Orthodox Church

Venmony PO Chengannur

Kerala -689509

147

Union Bank of India

Vizhinjam Branch

Mini Mandiram

Pulloorkonam, Vizhinjam,

PO Trivandrum,

Kerala -695521

148

Union Bank of India

Kundra Kollam Branch

Pushpamangalam Bldg.,

NH 208 (QS Road)

PO Kundara, dist.,

Kollam, Kerala -691501

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3049

149

Union Bank of India

Kalvoor Branch

Chilora bldg.,

North of Kalavoor, Jn NH 47

Dist. Alappuzha,

Kalavoor, Kerala -690521

150

Union Bank of India

Kayamkulam Branch

Building no. 30/2032

Harsha Tourist Home,

Archadevi, Puthiyadam

Kayamkulam, dist.Alleppey

Kerala -690502

151

Union Bank of India

Kowdiar Branch

Adarsh TC 4/987(1), 4/987(2),

Trivandrum, Kerala -695003

152

Union Bank of India

Thycaud Branch

Gangothri building,

Air Road, Thuycaud,

Dist.Thiruvananthapuram,

Kerala -695014

153

Union Bank of India

Thiruvanthpuram Retail Asset Branch

Union Bank Bhavan

M G Road, Statue Junction

Thiruvanthpuram

(Trivandrum),

Kerala -695001

154

Union Bank of India

Nedumangad Branch

Saraswathy Complex

Nedumangad

Dist. Thiruvananthapuram

Kerala -695541

155

Union Bank of India

Neyyattinkara branch

SNDP Neyyattinkara

PO Trivandrum,

Kerala -695121

156

Union Bank of India

Poojappura Branch

Shivani Minaram,

Opp.Corporation Market,

Poojapura,

Thiruvananthapuram,

Kerala -695012

157

Union Bank of India

Pathanapuram Branch

Plavilayil buiding,

Main Road, Dist. Kollam

Pathanapuram,

Kerala -689695

3050 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

158

Union Bank of India

Punalur Branch

Sara Shopping Complex

T B Juncion, PO Valacode

Punalur Pathenpuram Road

Dist. Koltam,

Kerala -690331

159

Union Bank of India

Pothencode Branch

Ellarbee Towers,

Sector No.478/13,

Pothencode

Mangalapuram Road

Dist. Thiruvananthapuram

Kerala -695584

160

Union Bank of India

Manacaud Branch

KPN Plaza, Manacaud Junction

Thiruvananthaapuram

Kerala -695009

161

Union Bank of India

Mannar Branch

Building No.944/4,

Lakshmi Building, Kurattissery

Mannar PO Dist.Alleppey

Kerala -689622

162

Union Bank of India

Mavelikara Kurathiyad Branch

KRUM building

PO Thekkakara,

Dist.Alleppey

Mavelikara,

Kerala -690107

163

Union Bank of India

Vattapaaraa karkulam branch

Lakshmi shopping maal

Vattapara

PO Trivandrum,

Kerala -695028

164

Union Bank of India

Varkala Branch

PVM Building

Temple road, PO Varkala

Dist.Thiruvananthapuram

Maidanam,

Kerala -695141

165

Union Bank of India

Valiyamala Branch

Chitra,

India Institute Of Space Science &

Technology,

Campus, Valiyamal Nedumangad,

Dist.Thiruvananthapuram

Kerala -695547

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3051

166

Union Bank of India

Saareekariyam Branch

Manashanthi building

Sreekariyam, Akkulam road

Dist.Thiruvanathapuram,

Kerala – 695017

167

Union Bank of India

Service BranchThiruvanthpuram

2nd floor, Union Bank Bldg.

P Boc. No.307

MG Road, Statue Junction,

Dist.Trivandrum,

Kerala -695001

168

Union Bank of India

Harippad Branch

Ratnamma Towers,

NH 47, Near govt. Hospital

Harippad, Kerala -6906514

Regional Office, Vishakhapatnam

169

Union Bank of India

Sarpavaram Junction Branch

1st floor, D No.10/134

Pithapuram Road

Near Sri Hanuman Temple

Sarpavaram Junction,

Kakinada,

Andhra Pradesh -530005

Regional Office, Chennai

170

Union Bank of India

Port Blair Branch

10 Gandhi Bhavan

Aberdeen Bazar, Port Blair

Dist Andamaan,

Andaman & Nicobar Island ,

Pin -744101

Regional Office, Bhuvneshwar

171

Union Bank Of India,

Athagarh branch,

Law College Road,

Block Colony,

Athagarh

172

Union Bank Of India,

Odagaon Branch,

Law College Road,

Block Colony,Athagarh

173

Union Bank Of India,

Kunjabanagarh-Daspalla

Gopinath Market Complex,

Plot No. – 2324/3053,

Durga Bazar

(Near Daspalla Block)

174

Union Bank Of India,

Kamakshya Nagar Branch

Sriram Residency,,

Ward No - 6,

Kamakshya Nagar

3052 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

175

Union Bank Of India,

Gopalpur Branch

Patthara Chhak,

Bahadurpeta,

Berhampur- 760007

176

Union Bank Of India,

Chandichhak Branch

Nuabazar Chhak,

Paradeep Road

Cuttack- 753004

177

Union Bank Of India,

Gopalpur Branch

Nuabazar Chhak,

Paradeep Road

Cuttack- 753004

178

Union Bank Of India,

Jairampur Branch

Inside Jairampur

Panchayat, Bhograi,

Balasore- 756038

179

Union Bank Of India,

Jaleshwar BRANCH

Badabazar, Jaleswar

Balasore- 756032

180

Union Bank Of India,

Jajpur, Road Branch

Chorda Road, Jajpur Road

Jajpur,

Odisha- 755 019.

181

Union Bank Of India,

Talcher Branch

Ward No 18,

Handidhua Chak

Talcher, Angul- 759100

182

Union Bank Of India,

Narayanpur Branch

Near Srirampur Gram Panchayat

Srirampur,Laxminath,

Raibania,

Balasore- 756032

183

Union Bank Of India,

Pattamundai Branch

Gajanan Market Complex,

Near Bus Stand , Pattamunda,

Kendrapara – 754215

184

Union Bank Of India,

Balichandrapur BRANCH

Post Office Balichandrapur,

At Patarajpur,

Dist Jajpur- 754205

185

Union Bank Of India,

Basudebpur Branch

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3053

Post Office Road

Basudebpur Bhadrak,

Odisha – 756168

186

Union Bank Of India,

Bhanjanagar Branch

Opposite Govt Hospital,

Bhanjanagardist Ganjam,

Odisha - 761 126

187

Union Bank Of India,

Mangalpur Branch

Post Office Mangalpur

At Kanikapada, Dist Jajpur

Odisha – 754 205

188

Union Bank Of India,

Markatnagar Branch

Abit Campus Sector-1 Cda

Markatnagar Abhinav Bidanas

Cuttack, Odisha – 753014

189

Union Bank Of India,

Mahura Branch

C V Raman College of Engineering Campus, Janla,

Dist. Khurda,

Bhubaneswar,

Odisha – 752054

190

Union Bank Of India,

Remuna-Januganj Branch

At Ganeswarpur,

Januganj,Balasore,

Odisha – 756019

191

Union Bank Of India,

Rairangpur Branch

Plot No - 54/1066,

Ward No - 9,

Rairangpur,

Odisha – 757043

192

Union Bank Of India,

Lewis Road Branch

Plot No-2862,

Lewis Road, Khordha,

Odisha – 751002

193

Union Bank Of India,

Srikona Branch

Plot No.3837/6176 (P),

Srikona,

Hamlet-Mirzapur,

Odisha – 758025

194

Union Bank Of India,

Sahidnagar Branch

Compound of Osph & Wxltd,

Janapath Po: Bhoinagar

,Bhubaneswar,

District: Khordha

Odisha – 751022

3054 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

195

Union Bank Of India,

Satyabadi Sakhigopal Branch

Main Road Infront Of Sbi

Sakhigopal District: Puri

Odisha – 752014

196

197Union Bank Of India,

Hinjilcut Branch

Rashmi Plaza,

Chaudhury Market Complex,

Main Road, Hinjilcut,

Dist. Ganjam,

Odisha - 761 102

Regional Office, Belgaum

197

Union Bank Of India

Gadag Branch

6690/183, Mr.S K Kabadar's Bldg., APMC Yard Comp

'Pragati', APMC Yard Rd,

PO Gadag,Dist Gadag,

Karnataka

198

Union Bank Of India

Gurumitkal Branch

NO.1-5-15,MAIN ROAD,

GURUMITKAL, DIST YADGIR

199

Union Bank Of India

Mudhol Kulburgi Branch

Near Kolkunda Cross

Mudhol, Taluka Sedam

Dist. Kalburgi,

Karnataka 585318

200

Union Bank Of India

Mahantesh Nagar,

Mr.A.B Govekars Bldg,

1st Flr, Anjaneya Nagar,,

Ashoka Complex,

Sec 10,CTC 6531-6534,

,PO, Malmaruti

MM Extn.,Belgaum,

Karnataka

201

Union Bank Of India

Yadgir Branch

Kalburgi Towers,

Near New Vidhan Soudha,

Chittapur Road,

Yadgir, Dist Yadgir

202

Union Bank Of India

Saidapur (Yadgir) Branch

Plot No.73/74,

Mahaveer Colony,,

Yadgir Road, SAIDAPUR,

Yadgir District,

KARNATAKA

Regional Office, Bengluru

203

Union Bank of India

Narasapura Branch

Survey No.294/4,

ground floor

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3055

Narasapur, Hobli,

Kolar 563133 Karnataka

Regional Office, Coimbatore

204

Union Bank of India

Avinashi Branch

15/78 A-6 Bharthidasan Street,

Kovai Main Road,

Avinashi, dist.Coimbatore

205

Union Bank of India

Uthagamandalam Branch

190/4 Hadfield Road

J.S.Complex,

1st floor, Hillbund Ooty

Dist.Nilgiris

206

Union Bank of India

Thiruvanaikoil branch

No.2 V.S.,Nagar,

Chennai Trunck Road

Thiruvanaikivil

Dist. Tiruchirapalli -621005

207

Union Bank of India

Peelamedu branch

No. 437 Avanashi Road

Opp Shanti theatre, Peelamedu

Coimbatore,

Dist.Coimbatore -641004

Regional Office, Kozhikode

208

Union Bank of India

Chittur (Palakkad dist) Branch

R K Building,

Chittur Palakkad Road

Chittur PO Palakkad,

Kerala -678101

209

Union Bank of India

Kalpetta Branch

Meenakshi Complex,

Kalpetta Post

Wayanad ,

Kerala -673121

Regional Office, Vijaywada

210

Union Bank of India

Bhavanipuram Branch

flat no. 307, bhavani Towers

Swathi Road, Bhavanipuram,

Krishna Dist. Vijaywada

Andhra Pradesh -500012

211

Union Bank of India

Krumaddali Branch

Door No.4-111A

Vedhapuram road

Near Anjaneyaswami Temple

dist. Krishna -521157

Regional Office, Ernakulam

212

Union Bank of India

Edapalli Toll Branch

Tol junction, NH 47 Edapally

Ernakulam, Kerala -682024

3056 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

213

Union Bank of India

Kadamakudy Branch

Madathil Parambil House

Pizhala PO

Cochin -682027

Regional Office, Siligudi

214

Union Bank of India

Sevak Road Branch

Post Siligudi,

Dist. Darjiling,

West Bengal -734001

Regional Office, Kottayam

215

Union Bank of India

Regional Office,

Kottayam, 3rd floor

Amala Tower

Adichira Junction,

Thellakom PO

Kottayam -686016

216

Union Bank of India

Erumeli South Branch

Kallukulangara Building,

Erumeli Mundakayam Road,

Near Private Bus Stand,

Erumeli PO Kottayam -686509

217

Union Bank of India

Thengana Branch

Angilimoottil Kannavattaa

Perumbanachiy PO

Changanasseery

Kottayam Kerala -686536

218

Union Bank of India

Santhanpara Branch

PKR Building Pooppara PO

Udumbanchola Taluk

Santhanpara

Idukki, Kerla

नई दिल् ली, 2 दिसम् बर, 2020

का.आ. 1053.— रा्‍ रीय आवास बैंक अजिजनयम, 1927 (1927 का 53) की िारा 6 की उृ-िारा (1) के

ंड (ड.) द्वारा प्रित्त िजियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन् द्रीय सरकार, एतद्द्वारा, श्री आनंि मिुकर के स्ट् ान ृर श्री

लजलत कुमार चन्िेल, आर् ाक सलािकार, जवत्तीय सेवाएं जवभाग, नई दिल्ली को तत्काल प्रभाव से और अगले आिेिों

तक, राष्ट्रीय आवास बैंक के जनिेिक मंडल में जनिेिक के ृि ृर जनयुि करती िज।

[फा. सं. 24/17/2010-आईएफ-II]

नेिा चौिान, उृ जनिेिक

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3057

New Delhi, the 8th December, 2020

S.O. 1053.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (e) of Sub-Section (1) of Section 6 of the

National Housing Bank Act, 1987 (53 of 1987), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Lalit Kumar

Chandel, Economic Advisor, Department of Financial Services, New Delhi as a Director on the Board of

Directors of National Housing Bank with immediate effect and until further orders vice Shri Anand Madhukar.

[F. No. 24/17/2010-IF.II]

NEHA CHAUHAN, Dy. Director

नई दिल् ली, 9 दिसम् बर, 2020

का.आ. 1054.—बीमा जवजनयामक और जवकास प्राजिकरण अजिजनयम, 1999 (1999 का 41) की िारा 4

द्वारा प्रित्त िजियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्द्वारा, श्री प्रमोि कुमार अरोड़ा, सजचव, (अंतरााष्ट्रीय

ृररचालन), भारतीय िीवन बीमा जनगम, कारृोरेट कायाालय, मुम्बई को ृि का कायाभार ग्रिण करने की तारी से

आरंभ में तीन वषा की अवजि के जलए अ वा बास वषा की आयु प्राप्त करने तक अ वा अगले आिेिों तक, िो भी

ृिले िो, चार ला रुृए प्रजतमाि (आवास और कार की सुजविा के जबना) के समेदकत वेतन ृजकेि ृर भारतीय

बीमा जवजनयामक और जवकास प्राजिकरण में ृूणाकाजलक जनिेिक (बीमांदककी) के ृि ृर जनयुि करती िज।

[फा. सं. आर-16011/02/2019-बीमा-I]

के. बी. नजय्यर, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 9th December, 2020

S.O. 1054.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 4 of the Insurance Regulatory and

Development Authority Act, 1999 (41 of 1999), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Pramod Kumar

Arora, Secretary (International Operations), Life Insurance Corporation of India, Corporate office, Mumbai as

Whole-Time Member (Actuary) in the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India, on a

consolidated pay package of four lakh rupees per month (without facility of house and car), initially for a period

of three years, with effect from the date of assumption of charge of the post, or till attaining the age of sixty-two

years, or until further orders, whichever is the earliest.

[F. No. R-16011/02/2019-Ins.I]

K. B. NAYYAR, Under Secy.

जविेि मंत्रालय

(सीृीवी जडवीिन)

नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम् बर, 2020

का.आ.1055.—केन्द्रीय रािनजयक और कोंसुलीय अजिकारी (िृ एवं फीस) के अजिजनयम, 1942 की

िारा 2 के ंड (क) के अनुसरण में वजिाजनक आिेि ।

एतद्द्वारा, केंद्र सरकार भारत के िूतावास, कोृेनिेगन में श्री नीरि, सिायक अनुभाग अजिकारी को

दिनांक 26 नवंबर 2020 से सिायक कोंसुलर अजिकारी के तौर ृर कोंसुलर सेवाओं के जनवािन के जलए प्राजिकषत

करती िज।

[सं. टी-4330/08/2020]

जव्‍णु कुमार िमाा, जनिेिक (सी.ृी.वी.)

3058 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

(CPV Division)

New Delhi, the 26th November, 2020

S.O. 1055.—Statutory Order in pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and

Consular Officers (Oaths and fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby authorizes Shri

Neeraj, Assistant Section Officer in Embassy of India, Copenhagen as Assistant Consular Officer to perform the

consular services with effect from 26 November 2020.

[No.T-4330/08/2020]

VISHNU KUMAR SHARMA, Director (CPV)

नई दिल्ली, 27 नवम् बर, 2020

का.आ. 1056.—रािनजयक और कोंसुलीय अजिकारी (िृ एवं फीस) के अजिजनयम, 1948 की िारा 2

के ंड (क) के अनुसरण में वजिाजनक आिेि ।

एति् द्वारा, केंद्र सरकार भारत के भारत के िूतावास, रबात में श्री अिीत कुमार, सिायक अनुभाग

अजिकारी को दिनांक 27 नवंबर, 2020 से सिायक कोंसुलर अजिकारी के तौर ृर कोंसुलर सेवाओं के जनवािन के

जलए प्राजिकषत करती िज।

[सं. टी-4330/01/2016]

जव्‍णु कुमार िमाा, जनिेिक (सी.ृी.वी.)

New Delhi, the 27th November, 2020

S.O. 1056.— Statutory Order in pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and

Consular Officers (Oaths and fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Ajit

Kumar, Assistant Section Officer as Assistant Consular Officer in Embassy of India, Rabat to perform the

Consular services with effect from 27 November 2020.

[No.T-4330/01/2016]

VISHNU KUMAR SHARMA, Director (CPV)

कार्माक, लोक जिकायत त ा ृेंिन मंत्रालय

(कार्माक और प्रजिक्षण जवभाग)

नई दिल् ली, 8 दिसम् बर, 2020

का.आ. 1057. —केन् द्र सरकार, एतिद्वारा दिल् ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना अजिजनयम, 1946 (1946 का

25) की िारा 5 की उृ-िारा (1) सृर त िारा 6 द्वारा प्रित्त िजियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मध्य प्रिेि राज् य सरकार

के गषि जवभाग मंत्रालय, भोृाल की अंग्रेिी में िारी अजिसूचना, सं. एफ-12-78/2020/बी-1/िो, दिनांक

06.10.2020 के माध्यम से िारी सिमजत से, मनुआभान टेकरी, कोि-ए-दफ़ज़ा, भोृाल में दिनांक 30-04-2019

को एक नाबाजलग लड़की के बलात्कार एवं ित्या की घटना के संबंि में कोि-ए-दफ़ज़ा ाना, भोृाल (म.प्र.) में

भारतीय िंड संजिता (1860 का 45) की िाराएं 363, 366, 376 डीए, 302, 201 और लैंजगक अृरािों से

बालकों का संरक्षण अजिजनयम, 2012 (2012 का 32) की िाराएं 5(आर) और 6 के तित ििा मामला अृराि सं.

276/19 से िुड़े अृराि(िों) का अन्वेषण त ा ऐसे अृरािों से िुड़े या उससे संबद्ध दकसी िु्‍प्रयास, िु्‍प्रेरणा

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3059

और/अ वा षड्यंत्र एवं/अ वा उसी संव्यविार में दकए गए या उन्िीं तथ्यों से उत्ृन्न दकसी अन्य अृराि का अन्वेषण

करने के जलए दिल्ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना के सिस्ट्यों की िजियों और क्षेत्राजिकार का जवस्ट्तार समस्ट्त मध्य प्रिेि

राज्य में करती िज।

[फा. सं. 228/22/2020-एवीडी-II]

संिय कुमार चौरजसया, अवर सजचव

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department of Personnel and Training)

New Delhi, 8th December, 2020

S.O. 1057.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of

the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the

State Government of Madhya Pradesh, vide Notification issued in English, No. F-12-78/2020/B-1/TWO

dated 06-10-2020 of Home Department Mantralaya, Bhopal, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the

members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole state of Madhya Pradesh for investigation into

the offence(s) relating to case Crime No. 276/19, under sections 363, 366, 376 DA, 302, 201 of the Indian Penal

Code (45 of 1860) and sections 5(r) and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (32 of

2012) registered at Police Station Koh-e-fiza, Bhopal (M.P.) pertaining to an incident of rape and murder of a

minor girl occurred on 30-04-2019 at Manuabhan Tekri, Koh-e-fiza, Bhopal and any attempt, abetment and/or

conspiracy, in relation to or in connection with such offence(s) and/or for any other offence committed in the

course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.

[F. No. 228/28/2020-AVD-II]

SANJAY KUMAR CHAURASIA, Under Secy.

वाजणज्य एवं उद्योग मंत्रालय

(वाजणज्य जवभाग)

नई दिल्ली, 10 दिसम् बर, 2020

का.आ. 1058.—केन्द्रीय सरकार, जनयाात (गुणवत्ता जनयंत्रण एंव जनरीक्षण) अजिजनयम, 1963 (1963 का

22) की िारा 7 की उृिारा (1) के सा ृर त जनयाात (गुणवत्ता जनयंत्रण एंव जनरीक्षण) जनयम, 1964 के जनयम

12, के उृजनयम (2) द्वारा प्रित्त िजियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मेससा एसिीएस इंजडया प्राइवेट जलजमटेड, प्लॉट

नंबर 64, िीआईडीसी मेन रोड, िरमृुर, ृोरबंिर, गुिरात-360577 (जिसे एतद्ृिात उि अजभकरण माना

िाएगा) को इस अजिसूचना के िासकीय रािृत्र में प्रकािन की तारी से तीन वषा की अवजि के जलए, वाजणज्य

मंत्रालय की िासकीय रािृत्र में प्रकाजित भारत सरकार की अजिसूचना के सा अनुसूची में जनर्िा्‍ ट दिनांक 20

दिसम्बर, 1965 की अजिसूचना की सं्‍या का.आ. 3975 त ा दिनांक 20 दिसम्बर, 1965 की अजिसूचना सं.

का.आ. 3972 के तित प्रकाजित अजिसूचना में उृाबद्ध अनुसूची में जवजनर्िाष्ट जनि और अयस्ट् क – समूि-I अ ाात,

लौि अयस्ट्क, बॉक्साइट और समूि-II अ ाात, हज़ंक कॉन्सरेट, के जनयाात से ृूवा जनम्नजलज त ितों के अिीन ृोरबंिर

ृत्तन, जृृावाव ृत्तन, बेिी ृत्तन, ओ ा ृत्तन, कांडला ृत्तन और मुंिरा ृत्तन में उक् त जनि एवं अयस्ट् क के

जनरीक्षण करने के जलए एक अजभकरण के प ृ में मान्यता िेती िज, अ ाात् :

(i)

यि अजभकरण, जनि और अयस्ट्क समूि-। के जनयाात (जनरीक्षण) जनयम, 1965 जनि और अयस्ट्क

समूि-II के जनयाात (जनरीक्षण) जनयम, 1965 के जनयम 4 के अिीन जनरीक्षण की ृद्धजत की िााँच

3060 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

करने के जलये जनयाात जनरीक्षण ृररषि् द्वारा जनजमत्त नामजनर्िाष्ट अजिकाररयों को ृयााप्त सुजविाएं

िेगी; और

(ii) यि अजभकरण, इस अजिसूचना में य ा जवजनर्िा्‍ ट अृने कायो का जन्‍ ृािन करने के जलए, जनिेिक

(जनरीक्षण और गुणवत्ता जनयंत्रण) जनयाात जनरीक्षण ृररषि द्वारा समय-समय ृर, जलज त प ृ में,

दिए गए जनिेिों से आबद्ध िोंगी ।

[फा. सं. के-16014/14/2020-जनयाात जनरीक्षण]

दिवाकर ना जमसरा, संयुि सजचव

MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY

(DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE)

New Delhi, the 10th December, 2020

S.O. 1058.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 7 of the Export (Quality Control and

Inspection) Act, 1963 (22 of 1963) read with sub-rule (2) of rule 12 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Rules,

1964, the Central Government hereby recognises M/s SGS India Private Limited, Plot No. 64, GIDC Main Road,

Dharampur, Porbandar, Gujarat-360577 as an agency for a period of three years with effect from the date of publication of

this notification in the Official Gazette , for the inspection of Minerals & Ores, Group-I, namely, Iron Ore, Bauxite and

Group-II namely, Zinc Cocentrates as specified in the Schedule annexed to the notification of the Government of India in the

Ministry of Commerce, published in the official Gazette vide number S.O. 3975, dated the 20th December, 1965, and

S.O. 3978 dated the 20th December, 1965 respectively, prior to export of the said Minerals and Ores at Porbandar Port,

Pipavav Port, Bedi Port, Okha Port, Kandla Port and Mundra Port subject to the following conditions, namely: -

(i)

the said agency shall give adequate facilities to the officers nominated by the Export Inspection Council in this

behalf to examine the method of inspection followed by them in carrying out the inspection specified under rule

4 of the Export of Minerals and Ores - Group I (Inspection) Rules, 1965 and the Export of Minerals and Ores -

Group II (Inspection) Rules, 1965; and

(ii)

the said agency, in performance of their function as specified in this notification shall be bound by such

directions, as the Director (Inspection and Quality Control), Export Inspection Council may give in writing

from time to time.

[F. No. K-16014/14/2020-Export Inspection]

DIWAKAR NATH MISRA, Jt. Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 7 fnlEcj] 2020

-—isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbuas ¼Hkwfe esa ç;ksDrk ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e]

1962 ¼1962 dk 50½] ¼blds ckn bls mDr vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gS½ dh /kkjk 2 dh mi&/kkjk ¼v½ ds vuqlj.k esa

dsUæh; ljdkj uhps nh x;h lkj.kh ds LrEHk ¼1½ esa mYysf[kr O;fDr dks Jh oh.vkbZ. xksfgy, lsokfuo`Ùk ¼xq ç ls½ ds

LFkku ij eSllZ ikbiykbu bUÝkLVªDpj fyfeVsM ¼ihvkbZ,y½ हेतु mDr lkj.kh ds LrEHk ¼3½ esa mYysf[kr izkÑfrd

xSl ikbiykbuksa ds fy, LrEHk ¼2½ esa mYysf[kr {ks=ksa ds laca/k esa mDr vf?kfu;e ds rgr l{ke izkf?kdkjh ds कार्यों

dk fuoZgu djus ds fy, ,rn}kjk izkf?kd`r djrh gS :-

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3061

O;fDr dk uke vkSj irk

{ks=kf/kdkj

izkÑfrd xSl ikbiykbu

¼ikbiykbuksa½ ds uke

¼1½

¼2½

¼3½

Jh ch- ,l- nos] vij lekgrkZ ¼lsokfuo`Ùk½]

l{ke izkf?kdkjh] ikbiykbu bUÝkLVªDpj fyfeVsM]

izFke ry] vkuan egy Vkoj – I]

Jhth vkjdsM ds lkeus] vkuan egy jksM]

vMktu]

lqjr - 395009]

xqtjkr

xqtjkr jkT;

ds lHkh ftys

ihvkbZ,y ikbiykbu

vkadksV Lij ikbiykbu

gthjk Lij ikbiykbu

fjyk;Ul Lij ikbiykbu

vVdikjMh Lij ikbiykbu

2- ;g vf/klwpuk tkjh gksus dh fnukad ls ykxw gksxh A

[Qk- la- ,y-14014@41@2016&th-ih- II]

jkt fd”kksj] voj lfpo

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi, the 7th December, 2020

S.O. 1059.—In pursuance of sub-section (a) of Section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines

(Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter called the said Act), the Central

Government hereby authorizes the person mentioned in column (1) of the table given below to perform the

functions of the Competent Authority vice Shri V. I. Gohil, Retired (GAS) under the said Act for M/s. Pipeline

Infrastructure Limited (PIL) in respect of areas mentioned in column (2) for the natural gas pipelines

mentioned in Colum (3) of the said Table:-

TABLE

Name and Address of the Person

Area of

Jurisdiction

Name of Natural Gas

Pipeline(s)

(1)

(2)

(3)

Shri B. S. Dave, Additional Collector (Retired),

Competent Authority, Pipeline Infrastructure Limited,

1st Floor, Anand Mahal Tower – I,

Opp. Shreeji Arcade, Anand Mahal Road, Adajan,

Surat – 395009,

Gujarat

All districts of

Gujarat State

PIL Pipeline

Ankot Spur Line

Hazira Spur Line

Reliance Spur Line

Atakpardi Spur Line

2. This notification will be effective from the date of its issue.

[F. No. L-14014/41/2016-GP-II]

RAJ KISHORE, Under Secy.

नई दिल् ली, 9 दिसम् बर, 2020

का.आ. 1060.—केंद्रीय सरकार, तेल उद्योग (जवकास) अजिजनयम, 1974 (1974 का 47) की िारा 3 की

उृिारा (3)( ) द्वारा प्रित् त िजियों का प्रयोग करते हुए एतद्द्वारा श्री रािीव रंिन, अृर सजचव, व्यय जवभाग को

20.11.2020 से 20.11.2022 तक या अगले आिेि िोने तक, िो भी ृिले िो, तेल उद्योग जवकास बोडा का सिस्ट्य

जनयुक् त करती िज।

[फा. सं. िी-32011/41/2016-जवत्त-I]

ृेररन िेवी, जनिेिक

3062 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 9th December, 2020

S.O. 1060.—In exercise of the Powers conferred by Sub-Section (3)(b) of Section 3 of the Oil Industry

(Development) Act, 1974 (47 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Rajeev Ranjan,

Additional Secretary, Department of Expenditure as a member of the Oil Industry Development Board

w.e.f. 20.11.2020 to 20.11.2022 or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. G-38011/41/2016-Fin.I]

PERIN DEVI, Director

जवद्युत मंत्रालय

नई दि ल् ली, 3 दिसम् बर, 2020

का.आ. 1061.—केंद्रीय सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम, 1976 के

जनयम 10 के उृ जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में जवद्युत मंत्रालय के प्रिासजनक जनयंत्रणािीन ृावर जग्रड कारृोरेिन ऑफ

इंजडया जलजमटेड के जनम् नजलज त कायाालयों जिनके 80 प्रजतित कमाचारीवषंि ने हिंिी का कायासािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर

जलया िज, को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजचत करती िज:-

1. ृावर जग्रड कारृोरेिन ऑफ इंजडया जलजमटेड,

िजक्षणी क्षेत्र ृारेषण प्रणाली-1,

765/400 के.वी. मिेश् वरम िी.आई.एस. उृकेंद्र,

मीर ानृेट (गॉंव), कन् िुकुर (मंडल),

रंगारेड्डी (जिला) – 501509 (तेलंगाना)

2. ृावर जग्रड कारृोरेिन ऑफ इंजडया जलजमटेड,

िजक्षणी क्षेत्र ृारेषण प्रणाली-1,

जचलकालूररृेट 765/400 के.वी. उृकेंद्र,

अन् नवरम ग्राम, रोम् ृीचेरला,

जिला – गुंटूर (आंध्र प्रिेि) – 522617

3. ृावर जग्रड कारृोरेिन ऑफ इंजडया जलजमटेड,

िजक्षणी क्षेत्र ृारेषण प्रणाली-1,

वरंगल 400/220 के.वी. उृकेंद्र,

ओगलाृुर गॉंव, िामेरा (डाक. एवं मंडल)

वरंगल ग्रामीण जिला – 506006 (तेलंगाना)

[सं. 11011/9/2017-ह िंदी]

राि ृाल, वररष्ठ सलािकार

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3063

MINISTRY OF POWER

New Delhi, the 3rd December, 2020

S. O. 1061.— In pursuance of Sub Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official

Purpose of the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notify the following offices of the Power

Grid Corporation of India Limited under the administrative control of Ministry of Power, where 80% of the staff

have acquired working knowledge of Hindi:

1. Power Grid Corporation of India Limited,

South Region Transmission System-1,

765/400 K.V. Maheshwaram G.I.S. Substation,

Meerkhanpet (Village), Kandukur (Mandal),

Rangareddy (District) – 501509 (Telangana)

2. Power Grid Corporation of India Limited,

South Region Transmission System-1,

Chilakaluripeta 765/400 K.V. Substation,

Annavaram Village, Rompicherla (Mandal),

District – Guntur (Andhra Pradesh) – 522617

3. Power Grid Corporation of India Limited,

South Region Transmission System-1,

Warangal 400/220 K.V. Substation,

Oglapur Village, Damera (P.O. & Mandal),

Warangal Rural District – 506006 (Telangana)

[No. 11011/9/2017-Hindi]

RAJ PAL, Sr. Adviser

नई दिल्ली, 3 दिसम् बर, 2020

का.आ. 1062.— केंद्रीय सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम, 1976 के

जनयम 10 के उृ जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में जवद्युत मंत्रालय के प्रिासजनक जनयंत्रणािीन एनएचृीसी जलजमटेड के

जनम् नजलज त कायाालयों जिनके 80 प्रजतित कमाचारीवषंि ने हिंिी का कायासािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जलया िज, को

एतिद्वारा अजिसूजचत करती िज:-

1. एनएचृीसी जलजमटेड,

क्षेत्रीय कायाालय-जसलीगुड़ी,

जवद्युत नगर, ृोस्ट्ट-सजटेलाइट टाउनजिृ,

जसलीगुड़ी, जिला-िलृाईगुड़ी

(ृजिम बंगाल)-734015

2. एनएचृीसी जलजमटेड,

चूटक ृावर स्ट्टेिन,

हमंिी, कारजगल,

लद्दा -194103

[सं. 11011/9/2017-हिंिी]

राि ृाल, वररष्ठ सलािकार

3064 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 3rd December, 2020

S.O. 1062.— In pursuance of Sub Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official

Purpose of the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notify the following offices of the NHPC

Limited under the administrative control of Ministry of Power, where 80% of the staff have acquired working

knowledge of Hindi:

1. NHPC Limited,

Regional Office-Siligudi,

Vidyutnagar, P.O.-Satellite Township,

Siligudi, Distt.-Jalpaiguri

(West Bengal-734015

2. NHPC Limited,

Chutak Power Station,

Minji, Kargil,

Ladakh-194103

[No.11011/9/2017-Hindi]

RAJ PAL, Sr. Adviser

.

श्रम एवं रोिगार मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 11 नवम् बर, 2020

का.आ. 1063.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में

केन्द्रीय सरकार मेससा मु्‍य मिाप्रबंिक, िूरसंचार, बीएसएनएल, िजिराबाि और अन्य एवं उनके कमाचारी के

प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और उनके कमाकारों के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िाष्ट औद्योजगक जववाि में केन्द्रीय सरकार

औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, िजिराबाि -1 के ृंचाट (संिभा सं्‍या 02/2012) प्रकाजित करती िज िो

केन्द्रीय सरकार को 30.02.2020 को प्राप्त हुए े ।

[सं. एल- 42025/07/2020-आईआर (डीयू)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 11th November, 2020

S.O. 1063.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 08/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court Hyderabad, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in

relation to The Chief General Manager, Telecommunications ,BSNL, Hyderabad, & Others, and their workmen

which were received by the Central Government on 30.08.2020.

[No. L- 42025/07/2020 IR (DU)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present: -Sri Muralidhar Pradhan , Presiding Officer

Dated the 29th day of July, 2020

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.No. 8/2012

Between:

Sri Chinta Venkateswara Rao

S/o Veerabhadraiah,

R/o H.No.3-5-303/1/B, Pilli Chinnakrishna

Thota, Khammam.

..….Petitioner

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3065

AND

1.

The Chief General Manager,

Telecommunications,

BSNL, Abids, Hyderabad.

2.

The Asst. General Manager (Admn.)

O/o CGMT A.P. Circle,

Hyderabad -1.

… Respondents

Appearances:

For the Petitioner :

M/s. M.V. Hanumantha Rao, K. Seetharama Rao, N. Hari Charan, A. Venu & P. Nithya

Nageswari, Advocates

For the Respondent : Sri R.S. Murthy, Advocate

AWARD

Sri Ch. Venkateswara Rao who worked as Mazdoor (who will be referred to as workman) has filed this

petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents Bharat Sanchar Nigam

Ltd., seeking for declaring the proceeding No.TA/STB/20-2/REP/06-10/21 dated 27.4.2010 issued by

Respondent No.2 as illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to

regularize or reengage the services of the workman by granting all consequential benefits.

2.

The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:

The case of the Petitioner is that the Petitioner has worked as Mazdoor (Casual labourer) in Railway

Electrification Project (REP), Secunderabad to Nagpur from 1.1.1994 to 30.9.1996 for a period of 1004 days

along with others. Thereafter, the Petitioner along with others continued on voucher payment basis for sometime

and thereafter on contract basis. The Petitioner along with others have been requesting the Respondent either

for regularization or to provide regular work to them. Still, no action was taken by the Respondents, even

though the Petitioner has worked for a considerable period. It is stated that the Petitioner came to know that

by proceeding dated 21.11.2006 similarly situated persons i.e.,79 persons have been regularized giving

temporary status to them by the Respondents. In fact those persons are juniors to the Petitioner and other

similarly situated persons. It is further stated that the Petitioner has come from a very poor family and have

been pursuing the authorities since long time with a hope that the Department would consider his claim in a

positive manner. But inspite of the request of the Petitioner no action was taken by the Respondents.

Thereafter, the Petitioner along with others approached the Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Bench at

Hyderabad by filing OA Nos.100/10 and 101/10 and after hearing both the parties the Hon’ble Central

Administrative Tribunal disposed of both the OAs on 10.2.2010 giving the following direction to the

Respondent “since the applicants in the OA also have similar claims as the applicants in the AP No.12872/08, I

consider it appropriate to dispose of this Original Application by giving a direction to the applicants to file

individual representation to the Respondents giving full details namely, their addresses, places at which they

were engaged, the period for which they were engaged etc., within a period of 4 weeks and on receipt of such

representations, the Respondents, shall examine their applications with reference to the records and the scheme

that was in force and pass orders within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of such representation.”

It is further submitted that as per the orders of the Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal, the Petitioner and

others submitted elaborate representations to Respondent No.1 along with the copy of the orders passed by the

Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal and also the attendance book etc., on 3.3.2010. But the Respondents

instead of appreciating the circumstances and without proper verification of records and without providing

opportunity of being heard, have issued the impugned letter dated 27.4.2010, directing the Petitioner and others

not to do any further correspondence with the Respondents. It is stated that the proceeding dated 27.4.2010 are

ex facie illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and contrary to the record and violative of the principles of natural

justice and violative of Art.14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. It is further stated that similarly situated

persons were regularized, therefore, the Respondents ought to have extended the same benefit to the Petitioner

also. It is also stated that the Respondents have extracted work from the Petitioners during subsequent period

and denial of the said benefit amounts to clear act of discrimination. It is stated that the Petitioner along with

similarly situated persons sought either for temporary status or for reengagement. But the Respondents did not

pay any heed to it either to give temporary status or to give reengagement to the Petitioner. It is further

submitted that the matter pertaining to the livelihood of the Petitioner who hails from the poor family and the

Respondents ought to have acted as a model employer by considering his case in a positive manner instead of

rejecting the claim without any cogent reasons. It is submitted that the Petitioner is having record and also the

Department had considered similarly situated persons and as such the Petitioner is entitled to get the appropriate

relief. It is also stated that the impugned order of Respondents No.2, is not only illegal, but also contrary to

3066 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

the earlier directions issued by the Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal. The Petitioner along with others

has filed their concerned books wherein the particulars of days worked by them and the number of days

worked in every month are duly certified by the officer of that time. They have also submitted the copies of

the IDs issued by the Respondents’ authorities. It is further stated that despite furnishing all the above

information, the Respondents’ authorities have not considered the request of the Petitioner and other similarly

situated persons for their regularization on par with similarly situated persons as done in other cases i.e., in the

proceedings dated 21.11.2000, and as such the inaction on the part of the Respondents is clearly discriminatory.

The Petitioner stated that the days book submitted by him clearly indicates about all the information of the

Petitioner with regard to his work i.e., MRPTS work, cable work or alignment store work etc.. It is also

submitted that the Petitioner was paid Rs.60/- per day. But inspite of the above information submitted by the

Petitioner his case has not been considered by the Respondents. Therefore, finding no other way the Petitioner

is compelled to take shelter in this Tribunal seeking the relief mentioned above.

3.

The Respondents filed counter with averments in brief as follows:

The Respondents’ management filed counter denying the facts averred in the claim statement. In the counter

the Respondents while admitting some of the facts made in the claim statement have also challenged the

maintainability of the petition. It is specifically stated that the Petitioner has filed this petition under Section

2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 seeking relief of reinstatement and regularization as a casual labour

in Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., and to set aside communication No.TA/STB/20-2/REP/6-10/22 dated 27.4.2010,

which is not maintainable in view of the amendment made in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Petitioner

has wrongly impleaded the Union of India as a party in this case. The Petitioner was not working under the

Respondents, and he was working under the contractor. There is no employer and employee relationship

between the Respondents and the Petitioner. It is submitted that there is no engagement of casual labour in

BSNL, after 1.10.2000 and the casual labour who have been engaged as such before imposition of the ban, order

vide letter No. 270/6/84-STN, New Delhi dated 30.3.1985 and letter No.270-6/84-STN dated 22.6.1988 for the

project circles and the line dismantling in the Electrification Project circles have been continued in BSNL, as a

matter of policy and the Petitioner having been engaged in Railway Electrification Project after imposition of

the ban in project circles vide letter dated 22.6.1988 is not covered by the policy thereof, and it is not open for

the Petitioner to assert for reengagement or regularization under the said policy. It is further submitted that

the Petitioner is confusing this Tribunal with regard to letter No.TA/STB/20-2/rep/06-10/22 dated 27.4.2010

pursuant to the direction of the Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal dated 10.2.2010 in OA No.100/2010

filed in continuation of WP No.12872/2008 in the Hon’ble High Court seeking for identical relief and the

communication dated 27.4.2010 was based on the directions dated 10.2.2010 in OA No.100/2010 to comply

with a judicial order notwithstanding the fact that the said OA No.100/2010 is misconceived and not

maintainable having regard to the definition of employee in Rule 3(8) of BSNL & CDA Rules 2006

implemented as such from 10.10.2006. It is clearly submitted that REP for line dismantling is distinct and

different and the said projects is outside the jurisdiction of the answering Respondents thereby leaving no

scope to reengage any casual labour engaged by the said projects organization after imposition of the ban order

and disengaging thereafter and entrustment of the work to a contractor thereby leaving no scope for

reengagement and regularization as per the settled law. It is submitted that the documents relied on by the

Petitioner do not form part of the records of the answering Respondents without any letters of engagement and

payment particulars while the maintenance of records is not the administrative concern of the answering

Respondents, and no records as such are maintained by the Respondents after the expiry of three years relating

to musterroll as per the retention schedule, and with the above averments, the Respondents submitted for

dismissal of the claim petition.

4.

During the course of hearing of this case, workman Sri Chinta Venkateswarlu is examined himself as

WW1 and also relied on 13 documents which are marked as Ex.W1 to W13, whereas the Respondents have

neither examined any witnesses nor even cross examined WW1, even after taking several opportunities.

5.

As per the averments made in the pleadings of the parties, the following points are to be

determined:

I.

Whether Lr. No.TA/STB/20-2/REP/06-10/22 dated 27.4.2010 is required to be set aside and the

Petitioner along with others is liable to be reinstated into service?

II.

Whether the Respondents are required to reengage the Petitioner along with others and whether the

Petitioner is entitled to be regularized by granting all consequential reliefs as prayed for?

6.

I have already heard the Learned Counsels for both the sides and perused the evidence adduced from

the side of the Petitioner.

7. Point No.I:

The Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner contended that the Respondents

engaged the Petitioner and others for REP for lying cable lines through out the railway track. In that process

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3067

the Petitioner along with others worked as a mazdoor (casual labourers) in the Railway Electrification Project

from Secunderabad to Nagpur from 1.1.1994 to 30.9.1996 for a period of 1004 days along with others

continuously. During that time Sri V.H.R.K.Vittal Rao, was the Divisional Engineer, Telecom (Railway

Electrification Project) Secunderabad, and was making payment to the Petitioner. He also used to sign on the

day book every month. The Assistant Engineer (Telecom) Railway Electrification Project, Secunderabad used

to provide work to the Petitioner and others and issued identity card to the Petitioner and others. He contended

that the nature of work and the number of working days clearly mentioned in the day book issued by the

authorities, which is the proof to show that the Petitioner and others were engaged and worked, for the

Respondents. He further contended that, the Petitioner along with others continuously worked under the

Respondents for which they were paid on voucher for some time and thereafter on contract basis. It is further

argued that the Petitioner along with others have been requesting the Respondents either for regularization of

their services or to provide regular work to them though, but even though they have given assurance, but no

action has been taken by the Department. Even though the Petitioner worked for a considerable period in the

Department, but his services were not regularized. He also contended that the Petitioner and others came to

know that by proceeding dated 21.11.2000 similarly situated persons of 79 persons have been regularized by

giving them temporary status by the Respondents, in fact, those persons are juniors to the Petitioner. He

contended that the Petitioner hails from a poor family and he has been pursuing the authorities since long time

with a hope that the Department would consider his claim in a positive manner. It is also contended that as no

action was taken by the Respondents, the Petitioner along with others filed WP No.12872/08 before the Hon’ble

High Court and thereafter, approached the Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal Bench at Hyderabad by

filing OA Nos.100/10 and 101/10, and after hearing both the parties the Hon’ble Central Administrative

Tribunal disposed of the OAs, on 10.2.2010 directing the Respondents to consider the grievances of the

Petitioner and others within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation. In obedience

to the order of the Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal, the Petitioner moved the Respondents by filing an

elaborate representation on 3.3.2010. But the Respondents vide their order dated 27.4.2010 rejected the

representations of the Petitioner and others which is illegal and violative of the principles of natural justice. It

is contended that the matter pertaining to the livelihood of the Petitioner as he hails from a poor family, the

Respondents ought to have acted as a model employer by considering the case of the Petitioner instead of

rejecting the representation of the Petitioner.

8.

On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that the case

is not maintainable as the Petitioner was not their worker. He was working under a contractor. There is no

employer and employee relationship between the Petitioner and the Respondents. There is no engagement of

casual labourers in Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., after 1.10.2000 and the casual labour who have been engaged as

such before imposition of the ban order and completion of the projects are only the casual labourers and they

are being continued in Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., as a matter of policy, and the Petitioner having been

engaged in the BSNL Railway Electrification Project after imposition of ban in project circles vide letter dated

22.6.1988 is not covered by the policy thereof and it is not open for the Petitioner to assert for reengagement or

regularization under the said policy. The Petitioner is confusing this Tribunal with regard to letter

No.TA/STB/20-2/rep/06-10/22 dated 27.4.2010 pursuant to the direction of the Hon’ble Central Administrative

Tribunal dated 10.2.2010 given in OA No.100/2010 filed in continuation of WP No.12872/2008 in the

Hon’ble High Court seeking for identical relief and the communication dated 27.4.2010 was based on the

directions dated 10.2.2010 given in OA No.100/2010 to comply with a judicial order notwithstanding the fact

that the said OA No.100/2010 is misconceived and not maintainable having regard to the definition of

employee contained in Rule 3(8) of BSNL & CDA Rules 2006 implemented as such from 10.10.2006. It is

further argued that REP for line dismantling is distinct and different and the said projects is outside the

jurisdiction of the answering Respondents thereby leaving no scope to reengage any casual labour engaged by

the said projects organization after imposition of the ban order and disengaging thereafter and entrustment of

the work to a contractor thereby leaving no scope for reengagement and regularization as per the settled law. It

is argued by the Learned Counsel for the Respondents that the documents relied on by the Petitioner do not form

part of the records of the answering Respondents without any letters of engagement and payment particulars

while the maintenance of records is not the administrative concern of the answering Respondents, and no

records as such are maintained by the Respondents after expiry of three years relating to muster roll as per the

retention schedule, and with these submissions, the Learned Counsel for the Respondents submitted for

dismissal of the claim petition.

9.

The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner further contended that only to deprive the Petitioner workman

from his legitimate right the Respondents have taken a stand that they have not utilized the services of the

Petitioner directly and the Petitioner was working under a contractor with whom the Respondents have made

an agreement. He also contended that the Respondents have exploited the poor Petitioner. He also contended

that such type of labour exploitation should be prohibited. In support of this contention he relied on a decision

of the Apex Court reported in (2011)15 decided in the case of Bhilwara Dugdh Utpdak Sahakari Samiti Limited

Vs. Vinod Kumar Sharma, dead by LRs and others in Civil Appeal No.2585 of 2006 209 (S.C.) wherein their

3068 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Lordships held that “Labour statutes were meant to protect the employees/workmen because it was realised that

the employers and the employees are not on an equal bargaining position. Hence, protection of employees was

required so that they may not be exploited. However, this new technique of subterfuge has been adopted by

some employers in recent years in order to deny the rights of the workmen under various labour statutes by

showing that the workmen concerned are not their employees but are the employees/workmen of a contractor, or

that they are merely daily-wage or short-term or casual employees when in fact they are doing the work of

regular employees. This court cannot countenance such practices any more. Globalization/liberalization in the

name of growth cannot be at the human cost of exploitation of workers.” He also contended that in order to

avoid the legitimate right of the Petitioner the Respondents have stayed various commissions which is not at all

acceptable from a huge organization like the Respondents.

10.

On consideration of the rival contentions of both the sides it is seen that the Petitioner was working

under the Respondents for a period of more than three years. The Respondents have also engaged the services

of the Petitioner in different fields. But no letter of engagement had been given in favour of the Petitioner. The

Respondents have taken a plea that the Petitioner was working under a contractor to whom they have engaged

for their work. The Respondents have exploited the services of the Petitioner by engaging him through

contractors. The Petitioner after disengagement and denial of regularly engaging him in any work, he has

moved the Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal who had also directed the Respondents to consider the

representation of the Petitioner. But the Respondents in a very casual manner considered the representation of

the Petitioner and rejected his representation without any reasonable grounds. The Respondents have also taken

a plea that the documents relating to the work of the Petitioner is not available with them and it is not their

duty to keep in custody and it is the duty of the administrative Department of the Respondents’ organization.

Taking such type of plea the Respondents can not be escaped from the liability when the administrative

Department is under the control of their organization. The Respondents should have called for the documents of

the Petitioner and passed a reasonable order while rejecting the representation of the Petitioner. The Petitioner

is also relied on 13 documents showing that he had worked under the Respondents and the officers of the

Respondents’ organization have recognized him as a mazdoor which clearly shows that without any malafide

intention the Petitioner has moved for the courts to get the relief. He has not prayed for regularization of his

service, but only to reengage him as a casual labourer. The Respondents would have engaged the Petitioner as a

casual labourer when they have already regularized the services of some similarly situated employees.

Therefore, it can safely be stated that the prayer of the Petitioner is genuine and the order passed by the

Respondents rejecting the representation of the Petitioner dated 27.4.2010 in a casual manner is liable to be set

aside and the said impugned order dated 27.4.2010 is also hereby set aside.

Thus Point No.I is answered accordingly.

11.

Point No.II: In view of the findings given in Point No.I, it is seen that the Petitioner was working as a

mazdoor/casual labourer under the Respondents for a period of three years i.e., for 1004 days, he has not

produced any letter of engagement. Only he wants to be a casual labour under the Respondents. The Petitioner

is only entitled to be engaged as a mazdoor/casual labour under the Respondents and is not entitled to get any

other relief as prayed for.

Thus, Point No.II is answered accordingly.

ORDER

In view of the findings given in Point Nos.I and II, it is hereby ordered: The case of the Petitioner is

allowed in part. The Respondents are directed to engage the Petitioner as a casual labour at the time of their

need, if they fail to engage the Petitioner as a casual labourer, they are directed to pay a sum of Rs.50000/-

(Fifty thousand) to the Petitioner towards compensation. This order be complied within four months from the

date of receipt of notification, failing which the Petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate steps according to

Law.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 29th

day of July, 2020.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3069

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the

Witnesses examined for the

Petitioner

Respondent

WW1: Sri Chinta Venkateswara Rao

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

Ex.W1:

Photostat copy of order dt.27.4.2010 issued by the Respondent No.2

Ex.W2:

Photostat copy of representation dt.3.3.2010 by WW2

Ex.W3:

Photostat copy of order in OA No.1229/2011 by Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal

Ex.W4:

Photostat copy of order in OA No.100/2010 by Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal

Ex.W5:

Photostat copy of order in OA No.101/2010 by Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal

Ex.W6:

Photostat copy oflr.dt.9.5.2007 issued by Divisional Officer, BSNL, (RE)(TP) Secunderabad

Ex.W7:

Photostat copy of Lr. of Director, BSNL, REP, Secunderabad dt.12.9.2002

Ex.W8:

Photostat copy of list of candidates issued by Div. Engineer, Secunderabad dt.11.9.2002

Ex.W9:

Photostat copy of lr.dt.13.11.2007 providing information under RTI Act along with list issued by

Respondent No.2

Ex.W10:

Photostat copy of lr.dt.21.11.2000 with regard to temporary status

Ex.W11:

Photostat copy of days book signed by Authority; Divisional Engineer

Ex.W12:

Photostat copy of identity card of Petitioner issued by Asst. Engineer Telecom

Ex.W13:

Photostat copy of order passed in WP No.12872/2008

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 4 fnlEcj] 2020

—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj cSad vkWQ cMkSnk ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; la- 1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 30@2016½ dks

izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 04-12-2020 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-12012@69@2016-vkbZ vkj ¼ch-II]

lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 4th December, 2020

S.O. 1064.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 30/2016) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court No 1, Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Bank of

Baroda and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 04.12.2020.

[No. L-12012/69/2016-IR(B-II)

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

3070 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947

Reference: No. 30/2016

Employer in relation to the management of Bank of Baroda, Gamharia Branch

AND

Their workman

Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For Employer

: Sri R.R. Prasad, Advocate.

For workman

: Sri R.R. Ram, Advocate.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:- Banking

Dated 31.08./2020

AWARD

By Order No. L-12012/69/2016-IR(B-II)) dated 28.09.2016, the Central Government in the Ministry of

Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section

10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Bank of Baroda, Gamharia Branch in alleged illegal

termination of Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh is legal, justified and proper? If not, What relief he is

entitled to?”

2. After receipt of the reference, both the parties were noticed. The concerned workman Dinesh Kumar Singh

has filed his written statement of claim on 02/01/2017 and the management Bank of Baroda, Gamharia Branch

through its Regional Manager Bank of Baroda, Jamshedpur has filed his written statement on 20/04/2017.

The workman Dinesh Kumar Singh has filed rejoinder to the written statement of the management on

02/06/2017.

3.

The claim of concerned workman namely Dinesh Kumar Singh as per his written statement is as

follows:-

That he had been working at Gamharia Branch of Bank of Baroda with effect from 05/02/2007 from

the very date of inception of this Branch of Bank of Baroda as a Cleaning Mazdoor cum peon. The Branch had

made local advertisement for employment of a person for the said job and he was holder of the employment

exchange card, so he was taken in employment after selecting him from a group of persons and said

employment card was taken by the Bank. Subsequently Dy. General Manager of the Bank of Baroda had

directed all the Branch Managers of the Bank of State of Jharkhand to issue advertisement to all such persons

who were working in their respective Branches as part time cleaning mazdoor/full time cleaning mazdoor cum

peon to apply for such post vide letter dated 22/25-10-2012. After that he had applied for the said post in a

prescribed pro-forma but he had not got any information about the action taken on his application. Thereafter

the management had stopped him from working in the branch with effect from 13/02/2015 without any charge-

sheet, notice, notice pay or compensation in utter violation of section 25 F of Industrial Dispute Act and

engaged a new man on this post in violation of section 25 H of I.D. Act. He was working continuously without

break in the said branch of the management since 05/02/2007 and he had been in continuous service for more

than 240 days in a year before termination of his service. The Branch Manager Sri Pankaj Srivastava informed

him that since he was not the employee of the Bank, so there was no question of his removing from service and

thereafter he had submitted several representation for his regularisation, payment of wages and reinstatement but

the same was not accepted. After that he raised an Industrial Dispute before the competent authority and

subsequently the matter was referred to the Industrial Tribunal.

A prayer has been made to hold the action of management in terminating his service as illegal,

unjustified and improper.

4.

The case of management of Bank of Baroda, Gamharia Branch through its Regional Manager Bank of

Baroda Bistupur Jamshedpur is as follows:-

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3071

That the present reference case is neither maintainable in law nor in fact. The concerned workman had

submitted the statement of claim after lapse of sixty days and he had to file the same within 15 days from the

date of receipt of notification, so this reference case is not maintainable. The Gamharia Branch of Bank of

Baroda had engaged concerned workman namely Dinesh Kumar Singh for sweeping and cleaning purpose

purely on casual/temporary basis intermittently on day to day basis and his engagement started in the morning

and ended with the completion of work for which he was engaged. The concerned workman had never been

appointed in the Bank by the competent authority as per the prescribed procedure and there is no relation of

employer and employee between the management and the concerned workman. The concerned workman is not

at all workman as per section 2(s) of Industrial Dispute Act and the appointment of Sub-Staff in Bank is

governed by statutory rules and guidelines. The Bank has laid down eligibility criteria for appointment in

Sub-Staff cadre which has specified minimum and maximum age limit, educational qualification etc. In terms of

the directions issued by the Central Government, employment of persons in Sub Staff cadre would be done

through employment exchange as also by advertisement for the post in the area where the vacancies are declared

but the concerned workman namely Dinesh Kumar Singh had never been sponsored by the employment

exchange and on this ground his claim is not maintainable. The concerned workman was engaged purely on

temporary basis as a stop gap arrangement without following the laid down procedure, so his case doesn’t fall in

the ambit of definition of Industrial Dispute Act. The concerned workman was never terminated from service as

he was never appointed by the Bank. The concerned workman was not at any point of time an employee of the

Bank and he was engaged for part of the day purely on casual/temporary basis for sweeping and cleaning

purposes. The concerned workman had neither been engaged nor worked continuously in Bank for 240 days in a

calendar year, so his claim is not maintainable.

A prayer has been made to hold the action of management as legal and justified and dismiss the claim

of workman.

5.

The concerned workman has submitted the rejoinder to the written statement of the management in

which he has denied the averments made in the written statement of the management.

6.

The concerned workman has examined only one witness. He is himself WW-1, Dinesh Kumar Singh.

7.

The WW-1, Dinesh Kumar Singh has deposed before the Tribunal that he had been appointed by

Gamharia Branch of Bank of Baroda on 05/02/2007 and he had been terminated from service by verbal order on

13/02/2015. He has also deposed that he had been working in the said Branch Office since 05/02/2007 as a

Cleaning Mazdoor- Cum- Peon and he had been paid wages as per Minimum Wages Act through vouchers on

weekly basis. He has also stated that he had worked continuously without any interruption and break with entire

satisfaction of management for 8 years from 05/02/2007 to 13/02/2015 and on 13/02/2015 he was terminated

from service without any notice/compensation. He has also deposed that the provision of section 25(F) of I.D.

Act had not been complied with as he had worked for 240 days in a year. He has also stated that he has applied

for regularization for his service in a specified pro-forma in the year 2012, but he didn’t get any information on

his application. He has also deposed that he had submitted his application for Conciliation before the Assistant

Labour Commissioner but the matter was not settled. He has also deposed that he is entitled to be reinstated and

to be regularised as a full time Cleaning Mazdoor with full back wages as per prevailing rate of pay in the Bank.

In the cross-examination he has deposed that the Branch Manager had issued appointment letter to him

and the same had been filed by him in this case. He has also deposed that his date of birth is 1967 and his case

was referred for regularization but the same was regretted. He has denied that in the year 2012 he was 45 years

old, so he was not eligible for appointment. He has also deposed that he don’t have any matriculation certificate

though he had passed it in the year 1984. He had denied the suggestion that he had not worked for 240 days in a

calendar year.

8.

The concerned workman has proved the following documents which are marked as:-

Exhibit W-1- Photo Copy of letter number Gamhar/06/70 dated 21.9.12 of Senior Branch Manager addressed to

Dy. General Manager Bank of Baroda, Jamshedpur.

Exhibit W-2- Photo copy of General circular letter dated 22/25-10-12 issued by Regional Office of Bank of

Baroda, Jamshedpur.

Exhibit W-3- Photo Copy of letter dated 17/08/2015 of Regional Office Bank of Baroda, Jamshedpur

addressed to concerned workman.

Exhibit W-4- Photo Copy of representation dated 24/02/2015 of concerned workman addressed to DGM Bank

of Baroda, Regional Office, Jamshedpur for regularisation of his service.

3072 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Exhibit W-5- Photo Copy of representation dated 17/07/2015 of concerned workman addressed to DGM,

Regional Office Bank of Baroda, Jamshedpur for his regularisation.

Exhibit W-6- Photo Copy of representation dated 12/02/2015 of concerned workman addressed to DGM,

Regional Office Bank of Baroda, Jamshedpur for his regularisation.

Exhibit W-7- Photo Copy of letter dated 25/08/2015 of Assistant Labour Commissioner, Chaibasa to the

concerned workman and Regional Manager Bank of Baroda, Jamshedpur.

Exhibit W-8- Photo Copy of reply of management of Bank of Baroda to Assistant Labour Commissioner,

Chaibasa.

Exhibit W-9- Photo Copy of reply of concerned workman to Assistant Labour Commissioner, Chaibasa.

Exhibit W-10- Photo Copy of representation of concerned workman to the Branch Manager regarding housing

loan.

Exhibit W-11 series- Photo Copy of Pass Book of concerned workman for the period from 01/07/2010 to

17/04/2017.

Exhibit W-12- Photo Copy of Voter Identity Card of concerned workman.

9.

The management has examined two witnessess. They are MW-1, Raj Kamal and MW-2, Kundan

Rajak.

10.

The MW-1, Raj Kamal has deposed that he was working as Senior Branch Manager at Gamharia

Branch in Bank of Baroda and the concerned workman Dinesh Kumar Singh was never appointed by any

competent authority in the Bank. He has produced the copy of guidelines issued by the Bank of Baroda which

has been marked as Exhibit M-1. He has also deposed that as per guidelines for appointment as a person of sub

staff, the eligibilities are maximum age 26 years on the date of appointment and class Xth pass educational

qualification. He has deposed that the concerned workman was engaged as casual labour on day to day basis and

he was never appointed in the Bank by any competent authority. He has produced the photo copy of Aadhar

Card and Election Identity Card of the concerned workman in which his date of birth has been mentioned as

1967. He has proved the Voter I-Card and Aadhaar card of the concerned workman and both the documents are

marked as Exhibit M-2 and Exhibit M-3 repectively. He has further deposed that the engagement of casual

labour is made on daily basis in contingency and is paid for that day only for number of days engaged in a

month.

In the cross-examination he has deposed that he was working at Gamharia Branch of Bank of Baroda

since 01/06/2017 and he has no knowledge when the concerned workman was discharged from service. He has

further stated that there is no record available in Bank regarding appointment of concerned workman. He has

also deposed that he has knowledge that on earlier occasion the concerned workman was engaged for cleaning

purposes and he was not paid wages on monthly basis whereas he was paid his wages on daily basis in cash. He

has also deposed that he has no knowledge whether the concerned workman was discharged from service on

13/02/2015 or not and he has no knowledge regarding serving of notice or holding enquiry in this matter. He has

further deposed that no record is available regarding continuous service of concerned workman since

05/02/2007 to 13/02/2015 as cleaning peon in the Bank.

11.

The MW-2, Kundan Rajak Spl. Assistant in Bank of Baroda, Kharsama, Jamshedpur has deposed that

he was posted at Gamharia Branch of Bank of Baroda since 2007 to 2019 and at that time the concerned

workman Dinesh Kumar Singh was working as clearing Mazdoor in the said Branch for work as per

requirement. He has also stated that the concerned workman was never appointed on casual basis by the

competent person and his remuneration was paid as per his work. He has also stated that the concerned

workman had never worked for more than 240 days in a year.

In the cross-examination he has deposed that he was not posted in Mango Branch on 05/02/2007. He

has further deposed that he has no knowledge that concerned workman was appointed on casual basis by the

Bank. He has further deposed that the concerned workman was paid for his work by voucher and he used to

prepare such vouchers for payment whereas attendance of the concerned workman was not marked on the

attendance register. He has denied the suggestion that the concerned workman was retrenched from service on

13/02/2015 without any information.

12.

The management has proved the following documents in support of this case which are marked as:-

Exhibit M-1- Photo Copy of letter of Zonal Regional Authorities dated 05 Oct. 2016 regarding guidelines of

recruitment of Substaff.

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3073

Exhibit M-2- Photo Copy of Aadhaar Card of concerned workman.

Exhibit M-3- Photo Copy of Voter ID Card of concerned workman.

13.

The learned lawyer of the concerned workman has submitted before Tribunal that the concerned

workman Dinesh Kumar Singh was appointed by the Branch Manager Bank of Baroda Gamharia on 05/02/2007

for working as cleaning mazdoor as well as peon and since that date the concerned workman had been working

in the Bank regularly. He has further argued that concerned workman had completed his attendance for more

than 240 days in each and every calendar year but the management had verbally terminated him from service

with effect from 13/02/2015 without any show-Cause notice/charge-sheet, so the management had violated the

provision of 25F and 25 H of the I.D. Act. He has also submitted that the concerned workman was paid his

wages through vouchers and this fact has been admitted by MW-1 and MW-2 in their evidence but the

management has not produced those vouchers before the Tribunal after calling for those documents by the

Tribunal, so adverse inference can be drawn. He has also submitted that concerned workman had applied for his

regularisation in the year 2012 but no decision was taken by the Bank management. He has also argued that the

concerned workman had taken loan of Rs. 3,00,000/- from the said Bank as a staff of the said Bank. He has

relied on the decision of Rajasthan High Court passed in Civil Writ Petition No. 5551 of 2016 and Civil Writ

Petition No. 125 of 2006.

14.

On the other hand the learned lawyer of management has submitted that the concerned workman is not

at all workman as per definition of 2(s) of the Industrial Dispute Act and there is no employer-employee

relationship between the concerned workman and the management. He has also submitted that the concerned

workman was appointed on daily basis for sweeping and clearing purposes on casual and temporary basis on

day to day basis. He has also argued that the concerned workman had not been terminated from the service as he

has never been an employee of the Bank. He has further submitted that the concerned workman has not

produced any appointment letter and termination letter showing that he had been an employee of the Bank, so

there is no question of his termination from Bank. He has also submitted that this reference case is not

maintainable. He has relied on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court as reported in SCC 2006 (L& S) 753, and

SCC 2007 (6) 7, SCC 2014 (13) 232, 2016 (1) JLJR and decision of Hon’ble Jharkhand passed in case of Bipin

Kumar Verma Vs. UCO Bank, Dhanbad -LPA No-268/2012.

FINDINGS

15.

It is the claim of the concerned workman namely Dinesh Kumar Singh that he had been working at

Gamharia Branch of Bank of Baroda w.e.f. 05/02/2007 as a Cleaning Mazdoor -cum –Peon but his services was

terminated on 13/02/2015 without giving any so cause or compensation to him. It is the further claim of the

concerned workman that he had worked for more than 240 days in twelve calendar months before his

termination of service.

16.

On the other hand this is the case of the management of Bank of Baroda that the concerned workman

had never been appointed as sub staff in Gamharia Branch of Bank of Baroda but he had been engaged for

sweeping work as daily wager. It is further case of the management that the concerned workman had never

worked continuously in Bank for 240 days in twelve calendar months, so his claim is not maintainable.

17.

Now, in the light of the pleading of both the parties the Tribunal will examine oral and documentary

evidence available on the record.

18.

The most competent witness in this case is WW-1, Dinesh Kumar Singh. He has deposed before the

Tribunal that he had been appointed by Gamharia Branch of Bank of Baroda on 05/02/2007 and his service had

been terminated by verbal order on 13/02/2015. He had also deposed that he had been working in the Branch

since 05/02/2007 as Cleaning Mazdoo-cum-Peon and he had been paid wages as per Minimum Wages Act

through vouchers on weekly basis. He has also deposed that he had worked for more than 240 days in a calendar

year but his service was terminated without complying the provision of Section 25F of the I.D. Act, so he is

entitled for reinstatement and regularisation of his service. In the cross-examination he has deposed that the

management had given appointment letter to him and the same had been filed. He has also stated that his date of

birth is 1967 and his case was referred for regularisation but the same was regretted. He has denied the

suggestion that in the year 2012 he was 45 years old, so he had not been eligible for appointment.

The MW-1, Raj kamal who was Senior Branch Manager of Gamharia Branch in Bank of Baroda as

deposed that the concerned workman namely Dinesh Kumar Singh was never appointed by any competent

authority in the Bank. He has also deposed that the maximum age for appointment of any person as sub staff is

26 years and the educational qualification is matriculation. He has also stated that as per Aadhaar Card and

Election Identity Card the date of birth of concerned workman was 1967. He has also stated that the concerned

workman was engaged as casual labour on day to day basis and he was never appointed as peon. In the cross-

3074 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

examination he has stated that he has no knowledge of the discharge of the concerned workman and no record is

available in the Bank regarding his appointment.

The MW-2, Kundan Rajak, who is Special Assistant in Bank of Baroda, Jamshedpur, has stated that he

was posted at Gamharia Branch of Bank of Baroda from 2007 to 2019 and at that time concerned workman was

working as a Clearing Mazdoor in the Branch but he was never appointed by the competent authority and he had

been paid his remuneration as per his work. He has also deposed that the concerned workman had never worked

for 240 days in a year. In the cross-examination he has stated that he has no knowledge that the concerned

workman was appointed on casual basis by the Bank. He has further deposed that the concerned workman was

paid for his work by voucher and he used to prepare such vouchers for payment whereas attendance of the

concerned workman was not marked on the attendance register. He has further deposed that the attendance of

concerned workman was not marked on evidence register.

19.

Now, coming to the documentary evidence of workman it appears that Exhibit W-1 is a photo copy of

letter dated 21/09/2012 issued by Branch Manager to the Dy. General Manager, Bank of Baroda , Jamshedpur in

which it is mentioned that one person namely Dinesh Kumar Singh is engaged for purpose on casual basis since

inception of Gamharia branch and payment to Dinesh Kumar Singh is made on weekly basis. Further Exhibit

W-2 is a general circular letter issued by Dy. General Manager, Bank of Baroda on 22/25-10-12 regarding

guidelines for appointment of ex-employee-cum-sweeper. Further Exhibit W-3 is a letter issued by Assistant

General Manager, Bank of Baroda to the concerned workman Dinesh Kumar Singh informing him that he was

not an employee of Bank, so there is no question of his termination from service. Exhibit W-4, Exhibit W-5 and

Exhibit W-6 are the representation of concerned workman to the Dy. General Manager, Bank of Baroda,

Jamshedpur for regularisation of his service in Bank. Moreover Exhibit W-7 is a notice of Assistant Labour

Commissioner to the management of Bank and concerned workman. Exhibit W-8 and Exhibit W-9 are the reply

of management and the concerned workman respectively to the Assistant Labour Commissioner, Government of

India, Chaibasa. Further Exhibit W-10 is the information given by concerned workman regarding settlement of

his loan. Exhibit W-11 is the copy of pass book of concerned workman and Exhibit W-12 is the identity card of

workman issued by Election Commission of India in which his date of birth has been mentioned as 39 years on

01/01/2006.

20.

The documentary evidence of management shows that the Exhibit M-1 is the detail guidelines for

appointment of staff of Bank of Baroda. Exhibit M-2 is the photo copy of Aadhaar Card of concerned workman

in which his date of birth has been mentioned as 1967 and Exhibit M-3 is the Identity Card of Election

Commission of India of the concerned workman in which his date of birth is mentioned as 39 years on

01/01/2006.

21.

Now, after analysing the oral evidence of WW-1 Dinesh Kumar Singh available on the record it

appears that the concerned workman had been engaged in the Gamharia Branch of Bank of Baroda on

casual/daily basis for cleaning purposes since 05/02/2007. Further this fact has been corroborated by Exhibit W-

1 a letter issued by Senior Branch Manager on 21/09/2012 in which it is mentioned that Dinesh Kumar Singh

was engaged for the purpose on casual basis since inception of Gamharia Branch and payment was being made

to him on weekly basis. Moreover the MW-1 and MW-2 in their cross-examination have admitted that the

concerned workman had been engaged for cleaning purpose in the Bank and was paid his remuneration. The

Exhibit W-4, Exhibit W-5 and Exhibit W-6 show that the concerned workman had been removed from the

service on 13/02/2015.

20.

It is relevant to mention here that on the prayer of concerned workman the payment vouchers and the

attendance register of the Bank for the period 2007 to 2015 had been called for but the same were not produced

on the ground that payment vouchers are not available and the name of concerned workman had not been

mentioned in the attendance register for the period 2007 to 2015,

21.

It is required to mention here that the MW-2 in its cross-examination has categorically admitted that

the concerned workman was paid for his work by vouchers and he used to prepare such vouchers for payment.

Since it is an admission by the management that payment was made to the concerned workman by vouchers but

the same were not produced before the Tribunal so adverse inference is drawn.

22.

In view of the above discussion the Tribunal comes to the conclusion that the concerned workman

namely Dinesh Kumar Singh had been working in Gamharia Branch of Bank of Baroda since 05/02/2007 till he

was terminated from service on 13/02/2015.

23.

It is important to mention here that the workman has been defined u/s 2(s) of Industrial Dispute Act.

The Section 2(s) of I.D. Act reads as follows:-

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3075

“workman” means any person (including an apprentice) employed in any industry to do any manual,

unskilled, skilled, technical, operational, clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward, whether the

terms of employment be express or implied, and for the purposes of any proceeding under this Act in

relation to an industrial dispute, includes any such person who has been dismissed, discharged or

retrenched in connection with, or as a consequence of, that dispute, or whose dismissal, discharge or

retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person-

(i)

who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or

the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or

(ii)

who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a person, or

(iii) who is employed mainly in a managerial or administrative capacity, or

(iv) who, being employed in a supervisory capacity, draws wages exceeding ( ten thousand rupees)

per mensem or exercises, either by the nature of the duties attached to the office or by reason of

the powers vested in him, functions mainly of a managerial nature

24.

At this stage it is relevant to mention here that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in a case as reported in 2011

LAB. I. C. 2799 (S.C) has been pleased to observe as follows:-

“14. It is apposite to observe that the definition of workman also does not make any distinction

between full-time and part-time employee or a person appointed on contract basis. There is nothing in

the plain language of Section 2(s) from which it can be inferred that only a person employed on regular

basis or a person employed for doing whole-time job is a workman and the one employed on

temporary, part-time or contract basis on fixed wages or as a casual employee or for doing duty for

fixed hours is not a workman.

15. Whenever an employer challenges the maintainability ground that the employee is not a workman

within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Act, what the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal is required to

consider is whether the person is employed in an industry for hire or reward for doing manual,

unskilled, skilled, operational, technical or clerical work in an industry. Once the test of employment

for hire or reward for doing the specified type of work is satisfied, the employee would fall within the

definition of ‘workman”.

25.

It is required to mentioned here that the concerned workman namely Dinesh Kumar Singh had worked

in the Gamharia Branch of Bank of Baroda on casual basis as Cleaning Mazdoor cum peon since 05/02/2007

and he was paid his remuneration on weekly basis as per Minimum Wages Act, so he was employed in the

Gamharia Branch of Bank of Baroda on hire and consequently he was a workman of the Gamharia Branch of

Bank of Baroda so, there was a relationship between him and the management as employer and employee.

Hence there is an Industrial Dispute.

26.

It is also relevant to mention here that the word retrenchment has been defined u/s 2(oo) of the I .D

.Act, definition of continuous service has been mentioned u/s 25-B of I . D .Act and the condition precedent to

retrenchment have been mentioned u/S 25 F of I.D Act.

Section 2(oo) of the I.D.Act reads as follows:-

Section 2(oo) -“retrenchment” means the termination by the employer of the service of a workman for any

reason whatsoever, otherwise than as a punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary action but does not include-

(a)

Voluntary retirement of the workman; or

(b) Retirement of the workman on reaching the age of superannuation if the contract of employment

between the employer and the workman concerned contains a stipulation in that behalf; or

(bb) Termination of the service of the workman as a result of the non-renewal of contract of employment

between the employer and the workman concerned on its expiry or of such contract being

terminated under a stipulation in that behalf contained therein; or

(c ) Termination of the service of a workman on the ground of continued ill-health.

The Section 25-F of the Industrial Dispute Act reads as follows:-

25-F Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen- No workman employed in any industry who has been

in continuous service for not less than one year under an employer shall be retrenched by that employer until-

3076 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(a)

The workman has been given one month’s notice in writing indicating the reasons for retrenchment

and the period of notice has expired, or the workman has been paid in lieu of such notice, wages for

the period of the notice:

(b)

The workman has been paid, at the time of retrenchment, compensation which shall be equivalent to

fifteen days’ average pay (for Every completed year of continuous service) or any part thereof in

excess of six months; and

(c)

Notice in the prescribed manner is served on the appropriate Government (or such authority as may

be specified by the appropriate Government by notification in the Official Gazette.)

At this stage it is required to mentioned here that the word continuous service has been define under

Section 25-B of the I.D. Act. The Section 25-B of I.D. Act reads as follows:-

25-B. Definition of continuous service – For the purpose of this Chapter,-

(1) a workman shall be said to be in continuous service for a period if he is, for that period, in

uninterrupted service, including service which may be interrupted on account of sickness or

authorized leave or an accident or a strike which is not illegal, or a lock-out or a cessation of work

which is not due to any fault on the part of the workman;

(2) Where a workman is not in continuous service within the meaning of clause (1) for a period of one

year or six months, he shall be deemed to be in continuous service under an employer-

(a) for a period one year, if the workman, during a period of twelve calendar months preceding

the date with reference to which calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the

employer for not less than –

(i)

one hundred and ninety days in the case of a workman employed below ground in a

mine; and

(ii) two hundred and forty days, in any other case;

(b)

…………………………………..

27. Now in this case there is categorical evidence that the concerned workman namely Dinesh Kumar Singh had

worked in Gamharia Branch of Bank of Baroda since 05/02/2007 to 13/02/2015 on casual basis as cleaning

mazdoor cum peon and in this regard a letter had been issued by Senior Branch Manager on 21/09/2012

(Exhibit W-1), so it appears that he had worked in the Bank for 240 days in a calendar year.

28.

In view of such fact the concerned workman was in continuous service in the Gamharia Branch of

Bank of Baroda as per definition mentioned u/s 25-B of I.D’ Act. Moreover there is also evidence that the

concerned workman was removed from his service w.e.f. 13/02/2015. Further there is no evidence before the

Tribunal that the concerned workman had been given one month notice in writing indicating the reasons for his

retrenchment/ removal or had been paid compensation equivalent to 15 days of average pay as per provision of

25-F of the I.D. Act.

29.

Hence, in view of above the discussion the Tribunal holds that the concerned workman namely Dinesh

Kumar Singh had worked in Gamharia Branch of Bank of Baroda since 05/02/2007 as a Cleaning Mazdoor

Cum Peon and he had been removed from service w.e.f. 13/02/2015 without complying the provisions of section

25F of the I.D. Act.. Further the action of the management in terminating the service of the concerned w.e.f.

13/02/2015 is not justified. Hence the concerned workman is entitled for relief.

30.

At this stage it is relevant to mention here that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in catena of decision has

been pleased to observe that the completion of 240 days work doesn’t under the law import the right to

regularisation and it merely imposed certain obligation on the employer at the time of termination of service.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in a case of Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd Vs. Dan Bahadur Singh, as

reported in (2007) 6 SCC 207, has been pleased to observe:-

“14. The next question which requires consideration is whether completion of 240 days in a year

confers any right on an employee or workman to claim regularisation in service. In Madhyamik

Shiksha Parishad vs. Anil Kumar Mishra it was held that the completion of 240 days’ work does not

confer the right to regularisation under the Industrial Disputes Act. It merely imposes certain

obligations on the employer at the time of termination of the services. In M.P. Housing Board vs.

Manoj Shrivastava (para 17) after referring to several earlier decisions it has been reiterated that it is

well settled that only because a person had been working for more than 240 days, he does not derive

any legal right to be regularised in serivee. This view has been reiterated in Gangadhar Pillai vs.

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3077

Siemens Ltd. The same question has been examined in considerable detail with reference to an

employee working in a government company in Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs. Workmen

and paras 34 and 35 of the report are being reproduced below: (SCC p.426)

“34. Thus, it is well settled that there is no right vested in any daily wager to seek regularisation.

Regularisation can only be done in accordance with the rules and not dehors the rules. In the case of

E. Ramakrishnan v. State of Kerala this Court held that there can be no regularisation dehors the

rules. The same view was taken in Kishore (Dr.) v. State of Maharashtra and Union of India v.

Bishamber Dutt. The direction issued by the services Tribunal for regularising the services of persons

who had not been appointed on regular basis in accordance with the rules was set aside although the

petitioner had been working regularly for a long time.

35. In Surinder Singh Jamwal (Dr.) v. State of J&K it was held that ad hoc appointment does not give

any right for regularization as regularization is governed by the statutory rules.””

The Hon’ble Jharkhand High Court has been pleased to observe in L.P.A No. 268/2012 which is as

under:-

“(xiv) Be that as it may, even assuming without admitting that this appellant has worked more than 240

days in couple of years, then also, his services cannot be regularized. 240 days’ working is not a magic

bond which converts illegal appointment into the legal appointment. In fact, 240 days working has

nothing to do with the regularization at all. 240 days working has got reference under Section 25-B of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for calculation of continuous years of service and nothing beyond

that. Unnecessarily several times the Labour Court or the Industrial Courts are committing an error

that if any worker has completed 240 days, their services should be regularized. In fact, there is no

casual connection at all between the working of 240 days and right of regularization. Illegality in the

appointment cannot be diluted by the working of 240 days. Illegality in the appointment continues, even

if, the worker has worked for 240 days.”

The Hon’ble Jharkhand High Court has been further pleased to hold as follows:-

“Whenever any employment is given unauthorizedly, in the respondent-UCO Bank, Hirapur, Dhanbad,

such type of employment cannot be converted into a regular employment unless there are rules for

regularization or scheme for regularization. In the facts of the present case, there are no rules of

regularization nor there is any scheme of regularization floated by the UCO Bank. In absence of such

type of law, the charity shown by the Court will be cruelty to others. If such type regularization is

allowed by the Courts, it will provide encouragement to those who are adorning high-ranking

administrative position to give illegal appointment and later on, to get them regularized by the orders

of the Courts. A thing which cannot be done directly, can never be done indirectly. If no employment

can be given without there being any advertisement and without there being any recruitment process,

the Court cannot be a party to illegal regularization of such employee.”

31. In view of such fact and in view of decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court and Hon’ble Jharkhand High Court

it is settled that the concerned workman is not entitled for regularization of his job for working 240 days in a

calendar year in Gamharia Branch of Bank of Baroda.

32. It is relevant to mention here that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in a case of BSNL Vs. Bhurumal as

reported in (2014) 7 SCC 177, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has been pleased to observe as under:-

34. The Reasons for denying the relief of reinstatement in such cases are obvious. It is trite law that

when the termination is found to be illegal because of non-payment of retrenchment compensation and

notice pay as mandatorily required under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, even after

reinstatement, it is always open to the management to terminate the services of that employee by

paying him the retrenchment compensation. Since such a workman was working on daily wage basis

and even after he is reinstated, he has no right to seek regularization (See: State of Karnataka vs. Uma

Devi (2006) 4 SCC 1). Thus when he cannot claim regularization and he has no right to continue even

as a daily wage worker, no useful purpose is going to be served in reinstating such a workman and he

can be given monetary compensation by the Court itself inasmuch as if he is terminated again after

reinstatement, he would receive monetary compensation only in the form of retrenchment

compensation and notice pay. In such a situation, giving the relief of reinstatement, that too after a

long gap, would not serve any purpose.

33.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in a case of District Development Officer Vs. Satish Kantilal

Amrelia as reported in (2018) 12 SCC 29 B has been pleased to hold as follows:-

3078 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

“16) In view of forgoing discussion, we are of the considered view that it would be just, proper and

reasonable to award lump sum monetary compensation to the respondent in full and final

satisfaction of his claim of re-instatement and other consequential benefits by taking recourse to the

powers under Section 11-A of the Act and the law laid down by this Court in Bharat Sanchar Nigam

Limited case (supra)”.

34. The Hon’ble Supreme Court is an another case Deputy Executive Engineer Vs Kuberbhai Kanjhibhai as

reported in 2019 (160) FLR 651 has reiterated the same principle.

35.

Now, in this case the concerned workman had been working in Gamharia Branch of Bank of Baroda

for about eight years as on casual basis as cleaning mazdoor cum peon and his service was terminated by the

Gamharia Branch of Bank of India in the year 2015 without complying the provisions of section 25F of the I.D.

Act. Moreover about five years have elapsed after his termination in the year 2015, so giving relief of

reinstatement after long gap would not serve any purpose.

36.

It is relevant to mention here that the facts and circumstances of this case is different from the facts and

circumstances of the case relied by the learned lawyer of the workman, so the decision of Hon’ble Rajasthan

High Court passed in Civil Writ Petition No. 5551 of 2016 and Civil Writ Petition No. 125 of 2006 is not

applicable in this case.

37.

In view of such fact the Tribunal comes to the conclusion that it would be just, proper and reasonable

to Award lump-sum monetary compensation to the concerned workman in full and final satisfaction of his claim

of reinstatement and other benefits.

38.

Hence, the following Award is rendered:-

“The action of the management of Bank of Baroda, Gamharia Branch in terminating service of Shri Dinesh

Kumar Singh is not legal, justified and proper, so he is entitled for relief.

Hence, the Gamharia Branch of Bank of Baroda is directed to pay a sum of Rs. 2,50,000/- (Rupees two

lakhs fifty thousand) to the concerned workman namely Dinesh Kumar Singh after proper verification as

compensation within one month after publication of the award.

This is the Award of this Tribunal.

DINESH KUMAR SINGH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 4 fnlEcj] 2020

.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj cSad vkQ cMkSnk ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] caxyksj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 06@2017½ dks izdkf'kr

djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 04-12-2020 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-12011@24@2016-vkbZ vkj ¼ch-II½]

lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 4th December, 2020

S.O. 1065.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 06/2017) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Bank of

Baroda, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 04.12.2020.

[No. L-12011/24/2016-IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3079

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIUBNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

BANGALORE

DATED : 13th NOVEMBER 2020

PRESENT : JUSTICE SMT. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

C R No. 06/2017

I Party

II Party

The General Secretary,

Bank of Baroda Employees Union,

Regd Office, C/o Bank of Baroda,

Kempgowda Road,

BANGALORE – 560 009.

The Dy. General Manager,

Bank of Baroda,

Regional Office, Lexington Avenue,

Brigade Road,

BANGALORE – 560 025

Appearances:

I Party :

Sh. Muralidhara, Advocate

II Party :

Sh. T. P. Muthanna, Advocate

1.

The Government of India, Ministry of Labourvide order No. L-12011/24/2016-IR(B-II) dated

26.04.2017in exercise of the power conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred as “The Act”) (14 of 1947) referred the following

Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Bank of Baroda, Bangalore, in not regularizing 44

workmen mentioned in the Annexure (A-VIII) enclosed, for the post of Sweeper-cum-Peon, is

legal and justified? If not, what relief the respective 44 workmen are entitled to?”

2.

On receipt of the reference order, notice was issued to both parties. Sh. MD, Advocate filed

represented the 1st Party and filed Claim Statement. 2nd Party appeared through their Learned Counsel Sh. TPM.

Though sufficient opportunity was provided they failed to file Counter Statement.The matter was posted for

Evidence of 1st Party. On 10.11.2020 Sh. MD filed a Memo which reads thus:

“I Party / Union has raised the above dispute seeking regularization of 44 workmen in the

services of the II Party / Bank. However, the I party has filed another petition seeking

regularization of around 500 workers in the II Party / Bank, which includes 44 workmen named

in the above case.

In view of the above, I Party does not want to press the above case for adjudication.

WHEREFORE, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dispose of the case (order of reference) as

“NOT PRESSED” in the interest of justice and equity.“

3.

In view of the above memonow it is not required to record any finding on the referred issue.

AWARD

Reference is Rejected.

(Dictated to U D C, transcribed by him, corrected and signed by me on 13th November 2020)

JUSTICE SMT. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 4 fnlEcj] 2020

.—vkS|kSfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj lSUVªy cSad vkQ bafM;k ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V

vkS|kSfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|kSfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; la- 1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 22@2014½

dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 04-12-2020 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-12011@63@2005-vkbZ vkj ¼ch-II½]

lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

3080 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 4th December, 2020

S.O. 1066.— In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No.22/2014) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court No 1, Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Central

Bank of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 04.12.2020.

[No. L-12011/63/2005-IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D. Act. 1947

Reference: No. 22/2014

Employer in relation to the management of Central Bank of India, Muzaffarpur

AND

Their workman

Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer.

Appearances:

For Employer

: Sri R. Ranjan, Advocate

For workman

: Sri B. Prasad, Rep.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:- Banking

Dated : 31.07 .2020

AWARD

By Order No.L-12011/63/2005-IR(B-II)) dated 12.02.2014, the Central Government in the Ministry of

Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub -section (2A) of Section

10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Central Bank of India, Muzaffarpur in terminating

the services of Shri Ramesh Kumar, Sub-staff, Devapur Branch, P.O.- Motihari, Distt. East

Champaran (Bihar) is legal and or justified? If not, what relief Shri Ramesh Kumar is entitled

to?”

2.

The Tribunal in this matter has passed an award on 06/04/2015 holding that the action of the

management of Central Bank of India, Muzaffarpur in terminating the service of Shri Ramesh Kumar, Sub-

Staff, Devapur Branch, P.O-Motihari, Distt- East Champaran (Bihar) is not justified, so the workman be

engaged at once, without giving any back wages. The management being aggrieved by the said award filed a

writ petition bearing W.P. (C) No. 993/2016 before the Hon’ble Jharkhand High Court, Ranchi. The Hon’ble

Jharkhand High Court, Ranchi has been pleased to set aside the said award and remitted the case back to the

Tribunal for hearing the parties afresh on the basis of materials already on record.

After production of the order of Hon’ble Jharkhand High Court passed in W.P. (C) No. 993/2016 both

the parties were heard again.

3.

The claim of the sponsoring union, Bihar, Provincial Central Bank of India Employees Association

representing the concerned workman namely Sri Ramesh Kumar, as per written statement, is as follows:-

That the concerned workman had been orally appointed by the management of Central Bank of India to

discharge the duties of a peon at Devapur Branch , P.O. Motihari, Distt. East Champaran (Bihar) w.e.f.

26/07/1999 and after appointment he used to work in the Bank from 10 A.M. to 6 P.M. The workman used to

discharge the duties in Bank including taking out ledgers/registers from the almirah, carrying token book/scroll

book from accounts department to cash department, taking out cash box from the strong Room, stitching of

currency notes, cleaning tables, chairs, posting of mails to Post Office, distribution of letter of Bank through

peon book, serving water, tea to the members of staff and customers and he had been paid his wages through

debit vouchers of the Bank. The concerned workman had been discharging all the duties of a peon from

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3081

26/07/1999 to 13/05/2000 uninterruptedly, so he had worked for more than 240 days in a calendar year but in

the evening of 13/05/2000 i.e. at the close of working hours, he was told by the Branch Manager that his

services were no longer required and on next day when he had gone to the Bank he was stopped from

discharging his duties without been given any prior notice or payment of compensation of retrenchment.

Thereafter the concerned workman had represented to the management for his reinstatement and regularization

of his services as a peon but no positive step was taken and on finding no redressal of this grievances, he had

raised an Industrial Dispute through the sponsoring union before the appropriate authority.

The sponsoring union has made a prayer for reinstatement of service of the concerned workman as a

peon under Bank’s Subordinate Cadre, regularization of his service and payment of his back wages from the

date of termination.

4.

The case of the management, Central Bank of India as per its written statement is as follows:-

That the concerned workman namely Ramesh Kumar was not workman so the instant dispute is outside

the scope of Industrial Disputes Act. The concerned workman was never appointed by the competent authority

on any permanent post after following and complying with prescribed proceedings under the rules for

employment in the service of Bank, so there was no employer-employee relationship between the concerned

workman and the Bank, as a result the instant dispute is outside the scope of the I.D. Act. The concerned

workman was engaged on day to day basis on a purely casual nature of jobs which came to an end at the end

each and every day and he was engaged for casual work from 26/07/1999 to 13/05/2000. The concerned

workman had never rendered continuous service in the Bank, so the scope and purview of section 25 F of

Industrial Dispute Act is not applicable. The concerned workman has raised the dispute after five years without

any reasonable and valid explanation for this long delay, so it is a stale case. It is an established principle of law

that a person who had been engaged in violation of rules and procedure of recruitment in a permanent post

cannot claim permanent employment under the employers, so the concerned workman is not entitled for any

relief.

5.

The concerned sponsoring union has filed rejoinder to the written statement of the management.

6.

The sponsoring union has examined two witnesses in support of its case. They are WW-1, Ramesh

Kumar the concerned workman and WW-2, Madan Prasad.

7.

The WW-1 Ramesh Kumar has deposed before the Tribunal that he had worked as peon in the Central

Bank of India, Devapur Branch, East Champaran and he used to discharge his work including putting ledgers on

the table, arranging/setting vouchers, cleaning of table, bringing tea for staff, putting cash box, distributing

letters etc from 10 A.M. to 6 P.M. all along since 26/07/1999 to 13/05/2000 continuously for 293 days on the

direction of the Branch Manager. He has also deposed that he used to discharge the work of a permanent

employee as there was no permanent employee at that time in Branch but he was retrenched from the service

from 15th May 2000 without any notice or any payment of compensation. He has also stated that he has

submitted several representation before the Management. He has proved the photocopies of those representation

which are marked as Exhibit W-1 series. He has also proved the photocopy of circulars of Bank dated

16/11/2000 to 13/09/2001 which are marked as Exhibit W-2 series. He has also proved a forwarding letter of

Bank dated 22/11/2000 and 20/09/2001 with enclosure which are marked as Exhibit W-3 series. He has also

stated that his claim is for reinstatement and regularisation as a peon is justified.

In the cross-examination he has deposed that he was not a member of any union and no union had told

me to be its member. He has also deposed that he used to get payment of wages through vouchers. He has also

stated that all the circulars and my representations which I had submitted before the Tribunal were taken by me

on the instruction of Branch Manager. He has denied the suggestions that he had worked as casual worker and

he was not regular worker in the Bank.

8.

The WW-2 Madan Prasad has deposed that he was posted as Branch Manager at Devapur, East

Champaran from 09/07/1999 to 13/05/2002 and at time Ramesh Kumar was working in the Branch from

26/07/1999 to 13/05/2000 as a peon like a permanent one. He has also stated that there was no permanent peon

at that time in Branch and the Branch Manager had made several request for regularisation of temporary worker

as permanent. He has proved the photo copy of letter dated 22/11/2000 and the proforma for temporary worker

dated 20/09/2001 which had already been marked as Exhibit W-2/1 and Exhibit W-2/4. He has also proved the

copy of letter dated 20/09/2001 which had already been marked as Exhibit W-2/3 as enclosure to the aforesaid

Exhibit W-2/4. He has also deposed that the concerned workman was covered under the scheme of the Bank, so

he had forwarded his name for absorption in permanent cadre.

In the cross-examination he has deposed that no written appointment letter was given to the concerned

workman and he was temporarily kept by him in the Bank. He has also admitted that there is no provision for

temporary workers to mark their attendance in the Muster Roll. He has also deposed that payment to the

concerned workman was made through vouchers subject to the approval of Higher Authority. He has further

3082 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

stated that the concerned workman had worked for 293 days. He has denied the suggestion that workman had

never done continuous work for 293 days.

9.

The sponsoring union has proved the following documents which are marked as:-

Exhibit W-1- Xerox copy of letter dated 17/05/2000 of the workman addressed to the Branch Manager, Central

Bank of India, Devapur Branch for reinstatement and regularization of his service as peon.

Exhibit W-1/1- Xerox Copy of letter dated 16/08/2001 of the workman requesting for reinstatement and

regularization.

Exhibit W-1/2- Xerox Copy of letter dated 06/01/2003 of the workman addressed to the Management for

reinstatement and regularization of his service.

Exhibit W-1/3- Xerox Copy of letter dated 28/12/2004 of the workman requesting for his reinstatement and

regularization of this service.

Exhibit W-2- Xerox Copy of Circular No: 16 dated 16.11.2000 of Central Bank of India, Regional Office,

Motihari.

Exhibit W-2/1- Xerox Copy of Letter dated 22/11/2000 of Branch Manager of Devapur Branch, CBI informing

the engagement of concerned workman and others on casual/temporary basis.

Exhibit W-2/2- is the Xerox Copy of Circular No: 1-02/14 dated 13/09/2001 of Central Bank of India,

Motihari.

Exhibit W-2/3- Xerox Copy of letter dated 20/09/2001 of the Branch Manager addressed to Regional Office

Motihari informing the Management regarding working of Ramesh Kumar from 26/07/1999 to 13/05/2000

continuously for 293 days as a Sub Staff(Peon).

Exhibit W-2/4- Xerox Copy of Proforma sent by the Branch Manager, Devapur certifying that the workman-

Ramesh Kumar worked at Devapur Branch.

Exhibit W-3- Xerox Copy of Circular dated 16/11/2011 issued by the Management of Central Bank of India

regarding absorption of the services of daily rated/casual workmen performing the duties of a peon.

10.

On the other hand the management has examined only one witness. He is MW-1,Vijay Kumar Mishra .

11.

The MW-1 Vijay Kumar Mishra has deposed that he had been working as Branch Manager, Central

Bank of India, Devapur Branch, East Champaran since 21/09/2011. He has also deposed that he came to know

through vouchers payment dated 31/07/1999 to 31/12/1999 that Ramesh Kumar had worked as a peon. He has

proved the photo copy of the vouchers in 17 sheets which are marked as Exhibit M-1 to Exhibit M-16. He has

also proved the vouchers dated 03/01/2000 to 13/05/2000 which are marked as Exhibit M-1/17 to Exhibit 1/26.

He has further deposed that the concerned workman was not issued any appointment letter for the job.

In the cross-examination he has deposed that he had joined Central Bank of India, Devapur Branch,

East Champaran on 22/04/2002 and he couldn’t say whether any permanent peon was posted in the said Bank at

that time or not. He has also deposed that Sri Madan Prasad was posted as a Branch Manager during that period.

He has further deposed that he had not seen any circular of the Bank for regularisation of temporary workman.

He has expressed his ignorance with regard to attention drawn on Exhibit W-2/2 as he was not in service at that

time. He has also deposed that the Exhibit W-2/4 shows 293 days with no permanent posting of a peon during

that period. He has admitted the circular dated 16/11/2011 regarding regularisation of temporary workman and

the same marked as Exhibit W-3. He has also deposed that he had no knowledge about the workman.

12.

The management has proved the following documents which are marked as follows:-

Exhibit M-1- PL Voucher date 31/07/1999 for Rs. 150 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 26/07/1999 to 31/07/1999

(6 days).

Exhibit M-1/1- PL Voucher date 10/08/1999 for Rs. 150 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 02/08/1999 to

07/08/1999 ( 6 days).

Exhibit M-1/2- PL Voucher date 14/08/1999 for Rs. 150 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 09/08/1999 to

14/08/1999 ( 6 days).

Exhibit M-1/3- PL Voucher date 21/08/1999 for Rs. 150 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 16/08/1999 to

21/08/1999 ( 6 days).

Exhibit M-1/4- PL Voucher date 30/08/1999 for Rs. 150 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 23/08/1999 to

28/08/1999 ( 6 days).

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3083

Exhibit M-1/5- PL Voucher date 04/09/1999 for Rs. 125 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 30/08/1999 to

04/09/1999 ( 5 days).

Exhibit M-1/6- PL Voucher date 11/09/1999 for Rs. 150 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 06/09/1999 to

11/09/1999 ( 6 days).

Exhibit M-1/7- PL Voucher date 24/09/1999 for Rs. 275 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 13/09/1999 to

24/09/1999 ( 11 days).

Exhibit M-1/8- PL Voucher date 15/10/1999 for Rs. 275 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 04/10/1999 to

15/10/1999 ( 11 days).

Exhibit M-1/9- PL Voucher date 30/10/1999 for Rs. 250 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 21/10/1999 to

30/10/1999 ( 10 days).

Exhibit M-1/10- PL Voucher date 30/10/1999 for Rs. 250 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 21/10/1999 to

30/10/1999 ( 10 days).

Exhibit M-1/11- PL Voucher date 12/11/1999 for Rs. 275 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 01/11/1999 to

12/11/1999 ( 11 days).

Exhibit M-1/12- PL Voucher date 20/11/1999 for Rs. 150 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 15/11/1999 to

20/11/1999 ( 6 days).

Exhibit M-1/13- PL Voucher date 04/12/1999 for Rs. 275 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 22/11/1999 to

04/12/1999 ( 11 days).

Exhibit M-1/14- PL Voucher date 11/12/1999 for Rs. 150 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 06/12/1999 to

11/12/1999 ( 6 days).

Exhibit M-1/15- PL Voucher date 18/12/1999 for Rs. 150 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 13/12/1999 to

18/12/1999 ( 6 days).

Exhibit M-1/16- PL Voucher date 24/12/1999 for Rs. 125 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 20/12/1999 to

24/12/1999 ( 5 days).

Exhibit M-1/17- PL Voucher date 31/12/1999 for Rs. 125 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 27/12/1999 to

31/12/1999 ( 5 days).

Exhibit M-1/18- PL Voucher date 07/01/2000 for Rs. 125 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 03/01/2000 to

07/01/2000 ( 5 days).

Exhibit M-1/19- PL Voucher date 15/10/2000 for Rs. 125 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 10/01/2000 to

15/01/2000 ( 5 days).

Exhibit M-1/20- PL Voucher date 29/01/2000 for Rs. 250 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 17/01/2000 to

29/01/2000 ( 10 days).

Exhibit M-1/21- PL Voucher date 05/02/2000 for Rs. 150 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 31/01/2000 to

05/02/2000 ( 6 days).

Exhibit M-1/22- PL Voucher date 15/03/2000 for Rs. 325 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 07/02/2000 to

12/02/2000 and 14/02/2000 to 19/02/2000 and 21/02/2000 ( 13 days).

Exhibit M-1/23- PL Voucher date 25/03/2000 for Rs. 225 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 13/03/2000 to

18/03/2000 and 23/03/2000 to 25/03/2000 and 21/02/2000 ( 9 days).

Exhibit M-1/24- PL Voucher date 10/04/2000 for Rs. 300 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 27/03/2000 to

08/04/2000 ( 12 days).

Exhibit M-1/25- PL Voucher date 29/04/2000 for Rs. 275 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 10/04/2000 to

29/04/2000 ( 11 days).

Exhibit M-1/26- PL Voucher date 17/05/2000 for Rs. 250 paid to Ramesh Kumar w.e.f. 02/05/2000 to

06/05/2000 and 08/05/2000 to 13/05/2000 ( 10 days).

13.

The learned lawyer of the Sponsoring Union has submitted before the Tribunal that the concerned

workman namely Ramesh Kumar had been appointed by Central Bank of India, Devapur Branch, East

Champaran on temporary basis in permanent nature and he had worked from 26/07/1999 to 13/05/2000, so he

had worked in the said Bank continuously for 293 days. He has also submitted that the management had

illegally and arbitrarily terminated his service without following the provision of 25 F of the Industrial Dispute

Act, so his service may be reinstated as a peon under subordinate cadre of Bank after regularising his service

and making payment of full back wages from the date of his termination. He has relied on the decisions of

3084 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Hon’ble Supreme Court passed in the case of Devandar Singh Vs. Municipal Corporation, Umrala Gram

Panchayat Vs The Sec. Municipal Employee Union, T.Nadu Termd. Full Time Tem. Lic… Vs Life Insurance

Corp. Of India & Ors and Vinay Prakash Vs. Bank of India. He has also relied on the decision of Patna High

Court passed in the case of Mithilesh Kumar Singh Vs State of Bihar and Ors and The Management of Punjab

National Bank Vs Mintu Kumar & Anr.

14.

On the other hand the learned lawyer of the management has submitted that the concerned workman

namely Ramesh Kumar had been engaged on daily wages and he was not a workman of the bank, so there is no

employer-employee relationship between the concerned workman and the Bank. He has also submitted that the

concerned workman had never rendered his continuous service in the Bank and had never worked for twelve

months in a calendar year. He has also argued that the claim of the sponsoring union is not legal and justified

and the concerned workman is not entitled for any relief

15.

Now the only point of determination in this case is whether the action of the management of Central

bank of India, Muzaffarpur in terminating the service of Sri Ramesh Kumar the concerned workman is legal and

justified and whether he has entitled for any relief.

FINDINGS

16.

It is pleading of the Sponsoring Union that the concerned workman had been appointed as a peon in

permanent nature in the Central Bank of India, Devapur Branch as a peon and he had rendered his service from

26/07/1999 to 13/05/2000 uninterrupted, so he had worked for more than 240 days in a calendar year but he had

been terminated without complying the provision of section 25F of the I.D. Act.

It is further case of the Sponsoring Union that the service of the concerned workman would be regularised in

subordinate cadre with the payment of all back wages.

17.

On the other hand it is the case of the management that the concerned workman was never appointed as

a peon and he was engaged as a daily wager in the Bank to meet the needs of the Bank, so there is question of

his termination from the service of Bank.

It is further case of the management that the concerned workman had never rendered continuous service of more

than 240 days in a calendar year in the Bank and he was not an employee of the Bank, so this reference case is

not maintainable.

18.

Now in the light of the pleadings of both the parties the Tribunal will analyze the oral and

documentary evidence of both the parties.

19.

In this case the most competent witness is WW-1 Ramesh Kumar. He has deposed that he worked in

the Central Bank of India, Devapur Branch as a peon since 26/07/1999 to 13/05/2000 continuously on the

direction of the Branch Manager and during that period there was no permanent peon in the Bank. He has also

stated that he had worked for about 293 days in the Bank continuously but his service was terminated from 15

May 2000 without following the provision of 25 F of the I.D. Act. In the cross-examination he has admitted that

the Branch Manager had not given any appointment letter to him.

The WW-2 Madan Prasad who was the Branch Manager during the said period has supported the case

of the workman and has deposed that the concerned workman had worked in the Branch from 26/07/1999 to

13/05/2000 and at that time there was no permanent peon in the Bank. In the cross-examination he has admitted

that no written appointment letter was given to him and he was temporarily kept by him. He has also admitted

that there is no provision for temporary workers to mark their attendance in Muster Roll.

20.

The MW-1 has deposed that he came to know through vouchers payment dated 31/07/1999 to

13/05/2000 that the concerned workman had worked as peon. In the cross-examination he has admitted the

circular dated 16/11/2011 of Central Bank of India regarding regularization of temporary workman.

21.

Now coming to the documentary evidence of the workman it appears that the Exhibit W-1, Exhibit W-

1/1, Exhibit W-1/2, Exhibit W-1/3 are representation of concerned workman submitted to the Branch Manager

for regularisation of his service against the permanent post on different dates. Further the Exhibit W-2 is a

general letter issued by Regional Manager, Central Bank of India regarding information of subordinate staff

engaged on casual/temporary basis and Exhibit W-2/1 is a letter issued by Branch Manager of Devapur Branch,

Central Bank of India to the Regional Office mentioning in details the information of subordinate staff engaged

on casual/temporary basis in which the name of concerned workman has been mentioned as working from

26/07/1999 to 13/05/2000 for a period of 240 days in one year. Further the Exhibit W-2/2 is a general letter

issued by the Regional Manager on 13/09/2001 regarding information of temporary workers. Moreover the

Exhibit W-2/3, is a letter of Branch Manager, Devapur to Regional Office, Motihari mentioning the name of

concerned workman namely Ramesh Kumar working as sub-staff since 26/07/1999 to 13/05/2000 and Exhibit

2/4 is pro-forma of information of temporary workers in which the name of workman namely Ramesh Kumar

has been mentioned as working from 25/07/1999 to 13/05/2000 total 293 days as sub staff and no permanent full

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3085

time staff posted during this period. Further the Exhibit W-3 is a general letter issued by AGM, Central Bank of

India regarding information temporary/casual workers.

22.

The documentary evidences of the management are the payment vouchers by which payment of wages

are made to the concerned workman. After perusal, it appears that Exhibit M-1 to Exhibit M-1/26 are vouchers

of payment made to the concerned workman as a labour charge of different period starting from 26/07/1999 to

13/05/2000. It further appears that payment was not continuous but he was paid for five days, six days or for a

longer period by different vouchers.

23.

Now, after analyzing the oral and documentary evidence available on the record the Tribunal finds that

the concerned workman namely Ramesh Kumar had been orally engaged as sub staff in Devapur Branch of

Central Bank of India without issuance of any appointment letter and the concerned workman had worked in

Devapur Branch of Central Bank of India since 26/07/1999 to 13/05/2000 continuously for 293 days. Further

the Tribunal also finds that the concerned workman had been paid his remuneration for the period he had

worked in the Bank on different dates and he had not been paid his salary on the monthly basis. The Tribunal

also finds that finds that the concerned workman had been removed from his service on 15/05/2000.

24.

It is important to mention here that the workman has been defined u/s 2(s) of Industrial Dispute Act.

The Section 2(s) of I.D. Act reads as follows:-

“workman” means any person (including an apprentice) employed in any industry to do any manual,

unskilled, skilled, technical, operational, clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward, whether the terms of

employment be express or implied, and for the purposes of any proceeding under this Act in relation to an

industrial dispute, includes any such person who has been dismissed, discharged or retrenched in connection

with, or as a consequence of, that dispute, or whose dismissal, discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute,

but does not include any such person-

(i)

who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the

Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or

(ii)

who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a person, or

(iii) who is employed mainly in a managerial or administrative capacity, or

(iv) who, being employed in a supervisory capacity, draws wages exceeding ( ten thousand rupees) per

mensem or exercises, either by the nature of the duties attached to the office or by reason of the

powers vested in him, functions mainly of a managerial nature

25.

At this stage it is relevant to mention here that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in a case as reported in 2011

LAB. I. C. 2799 (S.C) has been pleased to observe as follows:-

“14. It is apposite to observe that the definition of workman also does not make any distinction

between full-time and part-time employee or a person appointed on contract basis. There is nothing in

the plain language of Section 2(s) from which it can be inferred that only a person employed on regular

basis or a person employed for doing whole-time job is a workman and the one employed on

temporary, part-time or contract basis on fixed wages or as a casual employee or for doing duty for

fixed hours is not a workman.

15. Whenever an employer challenges the maintainability ground that the employee is not a workman

within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Act, what the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal is required to consider

is whether the person is employed in an industry for hire or reward for doing manual, unskilled, skilled,

operational, technical or clerical work in an industry. Once the test of employment for hire or reward for doing

the specified type of work is satisfied, the employee would fall within the definition of ‘workman”.

26.

It is required to mentioned here that the concerned workman namely Ramesh Kumar had worked in

Devapur Branch of Central Bank of India as sub staff and he was paid his remuneration by PL Vouchers of

Bank on different dates, so he was employed in the Devapur Branch of Central Bank of India on hire and

consequently he was a workman of the Devapur Branch of Central Bank of India and there was a relationship

between him and the management as employee and employer, so there is an Industrial Dispute.

27.

It is also relevant to mention here that the word retrenchment has been defined u/S 2(oo) of the I .D

.Act, definition of continuous service has been mentioned u/s 25-B of I . D .Act and the condition precedent to

retrenchment have been mentioned u/S 25 F of I.D Act.

Section 2(oo) of the I.D.Act reads as follows:-

Section 2(oo) -“retrenchment” means the termination by the employer of the service of a workman for any

reason whatsoever, otherwise than as a punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary action but does not include-

(a)

Voluntary retirement of the workman; or

3086 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(b) Retirement of the workman on reaching the age of superannuation if the contract of employment

between the employer and the workman concerned contains a stipulation in that behalf; or

(bb) Termination of the service of the workman as a result of the non-renewal of contract of employment

between the employer and the workman concerned on its expiry or of such contract being

terminated under a stipulation in that behalf contained therein; or

(c) Termination of the service of a workman on the ground of continued ill-health.

The Section 25-F of the Industrial Dispute Act reads as follows:-

25-F Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen- No workman employed in any industry

who has been in continuous service for not less than one year under an employer shall be retrenched

by that employer until-

(a) The workman has been given one month’s notice in writing indicating the reasons for

retrenchment and the period of notice has expired, or the workman has been paid in lieu of

such notice, wages for the period of the notice:

(b)

The workman has been paid, at the time of retrenchment, compensation which shall be

equivalent to fifteen days’ average pay (for Every completed year of continuous service) or

any part thereof in excess of six months; and

(c)

Notice in the prescribed manner is served on the appropriate Government (or such

authority as may be specified by the appropriate Government by notification in the Official

Gazette.)

At this stage it is required to mentioned here that the word continuous service has

been define under Section 25-B of the I.D. Act. The Section 25-B of I.D. Act reads as follows:-

25-B. Definition of continuous service – For the purpose of this Chapter,-

(1) a workman shall be said to be in continuous service for a period if he is, for that period, in

uninterrupted service, including service which may be interrupted on account of sickness or

authorized leave or an accident or a strike which is not illegal, or a lock-out or a cessation of work

which is not due to any fault on the part of the workman;

(2) Where a workman is not in continuous service within the meaning of clause (1) for a period of one

year or six months, he shall be deemed to be in continuous service under an employer-

(a) for a period one year, if the workman, during a period of twelve calendar months preceding the

date with reference to which calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the employer for

not less than –

(i) one hundred and ninety days in the case of a workman employed below ground in a mine; and

(ii) two hundred and forty days, in any other case;

(b)…………………………………..

28. Now in this case there is categorical evidence that the concerned workman namely Ramesh Kumar had

worked in Devapur Branch of Central Bank of India for more than 240 days in twelve calendar months as per

Exhibit W-2/1, Exhibit W-2/3 and Exhibit W-2/4, which are documents of the Bank, so the concerned workman

was in continuous service in the Bank as per definition mentioned u/s 25-B of I.D’ Act. Moreover there is also

evidence that the concerned workman was removed from his service on 15/05/2000. Further there is no

evidence before the Tribunal that the concerned workman had been given one month notice in writing indicating

the reasons for his retrenchment/ removal or had been paid compensation equivalent to 15 days of average pay

as per provision of 25-F of the I.D. Act.

29.

Hence, in view of above the discussion the Tribunal holds that the concerned workman namely

Ramesh Kumar had been working in Devapur Branch of Central Bank of India, since 26/07/1999 to 13.05.2000

as peon/sub staff and he had been removed from service w.e.f. 15/05/2000. Further the action of the

management in terminating the service of the concerned w.e.f. 15/05/2000 is not justified. Hence the concerned

workman is entitled for relief.

30. At this stage it is relevant to mention here that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in catena of decision has been

pleased to observed that the completion of 240 days work doesn’t under the law import the right to

regularisation and it merely imposed certain obligation on the employer at the time of termination of service.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in a case of Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd Vs. Dan Bahadur Singh, as

reported in (2007) 6 SCC 207, especially in Paragraph No. 18 as under:-

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3087

“18. The next question which requires consideration is whether completion of 240 days in a year

confers any right on an employee or workman to claim regularisation in service. In Madhyamik

Shiksha Parishad vs. Anil Kumar Mishra it was held that the completion of 240 days’ work does not

confer the right to regularisation under the Industrial Disputes Act. It merely imposes certain

obligations on the employer at the time of termination of the services. In M.P. Housing Board vs.

Manoj Shrivastava (para 17) after referring to several earlier decisions it has been reiterated that it is

well settled that only because a person had been working for more than 240 days, he does not derive

any legal right to be regularised in serivee. This view has been reiterated in Gangadhar Pillai vs.

Siemens Ltd. The same question has been examined in considerable detail with reference to an

employee working in a government company in Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs. Workmen

and paras 34 and 35 of the report are being reproduced below: (SCC p.426)

“34. Thus, it is well settled that there is no right vested in any daily wager to seek regularisation.

Regularisation can only be done in accordance with the rules and not dehors the rules. In the case of

E. Ramakrishnan v. State of Kerala this Court held that there can be no regularisation dehors the

rules. The same view was taken in Kishore (Dr.) v. State of Maharashtra and Union of India v.

Bishamber Dutt. The direction issued by the services Tribunal for regularising the services of persons

who had not been appointed on regular basis in accordance with the rules was set aside although the

petitioner had been working regularly for a long time.

35. In Surinder Singh Jamwal (Dr.) v. State of J&K it was held that ad hoc appointment does not give

any right for regularization as regularization is governed by the statutory rules.””

The Hon’ble Jharkhand High Court has been pleased to observe in L.P.A No. 268/2012 which is as

under:-

“(xiv) Be that as it may, even assuming without admitting that this appellant has worked more than 240

days in couple of years, then also, his services cannot be regularized. 240 days’ working is not a magic

bond which converts illegal appointment into the legal appointment. In fact, 240 days working has

nothing to do with the regularization at all. 240 days working has got reference under Section 25-B of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for calculation of continuous years of service and nothing beyond

that. Unnecessarily mes the Labour Court or the Industrial Courts are committing an error that if any

worker has completed 240 days, their services should be regularized. In fact, there is no casual

connection at all between the working of 240 days and right of regularization. Illegality in the

appointment cannot be diluted by the working of 240 days. Illegality in the appointment continues, even

if, the worker has worked for 240 days.”

The Hon’ble Jharkhand High Court has been further pleased to hold as follows:-

“Whenever any employment is given unauthorizedly, in the respondent-UCO Bank, Hirapur, Dhanbad,

such type of employment cannot be converted into a regular employment unless there are rules for

regularization or scheme for regularization. In the facts of the present case, there are no rules of

regularization nor there is any scheme of regularization floated by the UCO Bank. In absence of such

type of law, the charity shown by the Court will be cruelty to others. If such type regularization is

allowed by the Courts, it will provide encouragement to those who are adorning high-ranking

administrative position to give illegal appointment and later on, to get them regularized by the orders

of the Courts. A thing which cannot be done directly, can never be done indirectly. If no employment

can be given without there being any advertisement and without there being any recruitment process,

the Court cannot be a party to illegal regularization of such employee.”

31. In view of such fact and in view of decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court and Hon’ble Jharkhand High

Court it is settled that the concerned workman namely Ramesh Kumar is not entitled for regularization of his job

for working 240 days in a twelve calendar months in Devapur Branch of Central Bank of India.

32. It is relevant to mention here that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in a case of BSNL Vs. Bhurumal as

reported in (2014) 7 SCC 177, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has been pleased to observe as under:-

34. The Reasons for denying the relief of reinstatement in such cases are obvious. It is trite law that

when the termination is found to be illegal because of non-payment of retrenchment compensation and

notice pay as mandatorily required under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, even after

reinstatement, it is always open to the management to terminate the services of that employee by

paying him the retrenchment compensation. Since such a workman was working on daily wage basis

and even after he is reinstated, he has no right to seek regularization (See: State of Karnataka vs. Uma

Devi (2006) 4 SCC 1). Thus when he cannot claim regularization and he has no right to continue even

as a daily wage worker, no useful purpose is going to be served in reinstating such a workman and he

can be given monetary compensation by the Court itself inasmuch as if he is terminated again after

3088 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

reinstatement, he would receive monetary compensation only in the form of retrenchment

compensation and notice pay. In such a situation, giving the relief of reinstatement, that too after a

long gap, would not serve any purpose.

33.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in a case of District Development Officer Vs. Satish Kantilal Amrelia

as reported in (2018) 12 SCC 29 B has been pleased to hold as follows:-

“16) In view of forgoing discussion, we are of the considered view that it would be just, proper and

reasonable to award lump sum monetary compensation to the respondent in full and final

satisfaction of his claim of re-instatement and other consequential benefits by taking recourse to the

powers under Section 11-A of the Act and the law laid down by this Court in Bharat Sanchar Nigam

Limited case (supra)”.

34. The Hon’ble Supreme Court is an another case Deputy Executive Engineer Vs Kuberbhai Kanjhibhai as

reported in 2019 (160) FLR 651 has reiterated the same principle.

35.

Now, in this case the concerned workman had been working in Devapur Branch of Central Bank of

India since 26/07/1999 to 13/05/2000 and his service was terminated by the Devapur Branch of Central Bank of

India on 15/05/2000 without complying the provisions of section 25F of the I.D. Act.. Moreover after his

termination in the year 2000 about twenty years have elapsed, so giving relief of reinstatement after long gap

would not serve any purpose.

36.

It is relevant to mention here that the facts and circumstances of this case is different from the facts and

circumstances of the case relied by the learned representative of the workman, so the decision of Hon’ble

Supreme Court as passed in Umrala Gram Panchayat Vs The Sec. Municipal Employee Union, T. Nadu Termd.

Full Time Tem. Lic… Vs Life Insurance Corp. of India & Ors and Vinay Prakash Vs Bank of India & Ors. as

well as the decision of Hon’ble Patna High Court as passed in Mithilesh Kumar Singh Vs State of Bihar And

Ors, The Management of Punjab National Bank Vs Mintu Kumar & Anr. are not applicable in this case.

37.

In view of such fact the Tribunal comes to the conclusion that it would be just proper and reasonable to

Award lump-sum monetary compensation to the concerned workman in full and final satisfaction of his claim of

reinstatement and other benefits.

38.

Hence, the Devapur Branch of Central Bank of India is directed to pay a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/-

(Two Lakhs) to the concerned workman namely Ramesh Kumar after proper verification as compensation

within one month after publication of the award in Official Gazette.

This is the Award of this Tribunal.

DINESH KUMAR SINGH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 4 fnlEcj] 2020

.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj dsujk cSad ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] y[kuÅ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 55@2003½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 04-12-2020 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-12011@2@2003-vkbZ vkj ¼ch-II½]

lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 4th December, 2020

S.O. 1067.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 55/2003) of the Cent. Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Canara

Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 04.12.2020.

[No. L-12011/2/2003-IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3089

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL–CUM-LABOUR COURT LUCKNOW

PRESENT: P. K. SRIVASTAVA, HJS (Retd.)

I.D. No. 55/2003

Ref. No. L-12011/2/2003-IR(B-II) dated: 29.04.2003

BETWEEN:

The Assistant Secretary

Canara Bank Employees’ Union

C/o Canara Bank, 426 – W-2, Basant Vihar

Kanpur – 21.

(Espousing case of Sri K. N. Khatri)

AND

The Dy. General Manager

Canara Bank

Circle Office, Vipin Khand

Gomti Nagar, Lucknow (UP) – 226010

AWARD

1.

By order No. L-12011/2/2003-IR(B-II) dated: 29.04.2003 the Central Government in the Ministry of

Labour, New Delhi in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub section (1) and sub section (2A) of

Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) referred this industrial dispute for adjudication.

2.

The reference under adjudication is:

“WHETHER HE ACTION OF THE MANAGEMENT OF CANARA BANK, LUCKNOW IN

IMPOSING

THE

PUNISHMENT

OF

STOPPAGE

OF

TWO

INCREMENTS

WITH

CUMULATIVE EFFECT ON SHRI K.N. KHATRI VIDE ORDER DATED 31.3.2001 IS LEGAL

AND JUSTIFIED? IF NOT, WHAT RELIEF IS THE CONCERNED WORKMAN ENTITLED

TO?”

3.

It is admitted case of the parties that the workman, K. N. Khatri was working as Armed Guard in Sald

Mahadev Branch of Canara Bank, when he placed under suspension vide order dated 07.051992; and

subsequently, was issued a major penalty charge sheet dated 31.07.1992 for gross misconduct i.e. misbehaving

and assaulting the Manager/staff and disorderly behavior in the bank premises. The Disciplinary Authority, on

the basis of findings of the Enquiry Officer, issued show cause; whereby the workman was proposed of the

punishment of stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect upon the workman. The Disciplinary

Authority passed punishment order dated 31.03.2001; which was subsequently confirmed by the Appellate

Authority vide order dated 27.02.2002.

4.

It has been alleged by the workman that the Departmental proceedings which were conducted in

violation to the principles of natural justice is liable to be set aside. Moreover, he has also come up with a case

that the management of the bank had also lodged an FIR for the alleged misconduct; wherein charge sheet was

filed and later on he had been acquitted by the Trial Court on 27.11.1999 and on his acquittal, the workman

requested the management to drop the charges, but the management, denying his request proceeded with the

inquiry and after conducting the same in arbitrary manner, imposed the punishment of stoppage of two

increments with cumulative effect. The workman has also alleged that the Appellate Authority also rejected his

appeal dated 18.05.2001 vide order dated 27.02.2002 in utter violation of paragraph 19.14 of the Bipartite

Settlement an illegal manner and has prayed that the action of the management in imposing the punishment of

stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect be declared illegal and unjustified and the same may be set

aside with consequential benefits.

5.

The management of the Bank in its written statement has denied the allegations of the workman and

has submitted that the workman had been involved in willfully causing damage to the property of the Bank and

for misbehaving and assaulting the Manager/staff and disorderly behavior in the bank premises; resultantly, he

had been placed under suspension vide dated 07.05.1992 and subsequently was issued a charge sheet dated

31.07.1992 for gross misconduct. The management has also submitted that the was afforded all reasonable

opportunity to defend himself, inasmuch as the departmental proceedings were conducted in accordance with

the principles of natural justice and after thorough appreciation of the findings of the inquiry officer, the

workman was imposed with the punishment of stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect, which was

3090 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

subsequently confirmed by the Appellate Authority under Rules. As regards acquittal of eh workman in

criminal case, the management has submitted that the same was not clean acquittal but after giving him benefit

of doubt, therefore, it had no effect on the ongoing domestic inquiry. The management has submitted that the

punishment order is well reasoned and speaking; therefore, the same is liable to be up held, without any relief to

the workman concerned.

6.

The workman’s union has filed its rejoinder, reiterating the averments already made in the statement of

claim.

7.

The parties have filed documents in support of its case. The workman’s union examined the workman;

whereas the management has examined Shri Arun Srivastava, Inquiry Officer in support of their respective

case. The parties did not turn up to argue their case; however, their written submission were already on record,

therefore, keeping in view long pendency of the case, the file was reserved for award.

8.

Since the alleged action of the management for reduction of basis pay was based on the domestic

inquiry, therefore, following preliminary issues were framed vide order dated 26.02.2020:

(i) Whether the domestic inquiry conducted by the management is fair and proper; and

(ii) Whether the findings of inquiry officer are perverse?

(iii) Whether the punishment imposed is proportionate to the charges or not?

The parties have led their respective evidence on the schedule of reference as a whole; therefore, the

same is taken into account for adjudicating the preliminary issues framed hereinabove.

9.

It had been alleged by the workman that the Departmental proceedings which were conducted in

violation to the principles of natural justice is liable to be set aside. Moreover, he has also come up with a case

that the management of the bank had also lodged an FIR for the alleged misconduct; wherein charge sheet was

filed and later on he had been acquitted by the Trial Court on 27.11.1999 and on his acquittal, the workman

requested the management to drop the charges, but the management, denying his request proceeded with the

inquiry and after conducting the same in arbitrary manner, imposed the punishment of stoppage of two

increments with cumulative effect. The workman has also alleged that the Appellate Authority also rejected his

appeal dated 18.05.2001 vide order dated 27.02.2002 in utter violation of paragraph 19.14 of the Bipartite

Settlement an illegal manner and has prayed that the action of the management in imposing the punishment of

stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect be declared illegal and unjustified and the same may be set

aside with consequential benefits.

10.

However, in rebuttal the management has come up with a case, that the workman who was indulged in

disruptive activities at work place and not only used abusive language but also hurled his seniors causing utter

indiscipline, was placed under suspension and subsequently was issued a charge sheet to the workman and after

conducting a detailed inquiry, wherein the principles of natural justice was observed, the workman was found

partially guilty for the alleged charges and rsutantlly, the workman was punished with stoppage of two

increments with cumulative effect. It is also the case of the management that the FIR was also lodged against

the workman for similar deed; wherein he was acquitted, giving him benefit of doubt; hence the acquittal was

not clean. The management had argued that the management had right to proceed with the departmental inquiry

even after acquittal of the workman in criminal proceedings as departmental proceedings and criminal

proceedings stand in a different footing. The management has relied upon:

(i)

Hon’ble Supreme Court in Divisional Controller, KSRTC vs MG Vittal Rao

(Manu/SC/1368/2011).

(ii)

Hon’ble Supreme Court in Hon’ble High Cout of Judicature Bombay through its Registrar vs

Shri Uday Singh JT 1997 (5) SC 298.

(iii)

Hon’ble Supreme Court in Lalit Popli vs Canara Bank & others (2003) 3 SCC 583.

Issue No. 01:-

11.

As regards first issue regarding fairness of the domestic inquiry, the workman’s union has taken a stand

that the workman’s request for dropping the charges was not adhered to by the management of the Bank on the

basis of his acquittal in the criminal case with same charges and secondly that the principles of natural justice

was duly followed during the departmental proceedings. The workman stated on oath that he sought time to file

reply to the findings of the inquiry officer which was not granted; likewise, he was also not given opportunity

for personal hearing. However, the workman during his cross-examination, stated that he participated in the

inquiry proceedings, he was represented by one Sri Sudhir Sonkar in the said inquiry. He also stated that he was

granted adjournment on absence of his defence representative; moreover, he also filed with written submission

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3091

before the inquiry, he was given copy of report of inquiry officer along with show cause and was given time for

representation and when he did not represent in time, the punishment was imposed upon him. Though the

workman has pleaded that there was violation of principles of natural justice; but failed to substantiate the same

through cogent evidence i.e. documentary or oral. On the contrary, from perusal of the admission made by him

during the cross-examination before this Tribunal this goes to establish that the domestic inquiry was fairly

conducted by the management and the workman had been given all reasonable opportunity to defend himself

during the course of the inquiry and the workman’s union has pleaded wrong facts before this Tribunal and it

has not come with clean hands.

Also, Hon’ble Supreme Court in Karnataka Power Transmission Corpn. Ltd. vs Sri C. Nagaraju &

Anr. 2019 LLR 1181 has observed as under:

“9.

Acquittal by a criminal court would not debar an employer from exercising the power to

conduct departmental proceedings in accordance with the rules and regulations. The two

proceedings, criminal and departmental, are entirely different. They operate in different fields and

have different objectives. Ajit Kumar Nag (Supra). In the disciplinary proceedings, the question in

whether the Respondent is guilty of such conduct as would merit his removal from service or a lesser

punishment, as the case may be, whereas in the criminal proceedings, the question is whether the

offences registered against him under the PC Act are established, and if established, what sentence

should be imposed upon him. The standard of proof, the mode of inquiry and the rules governing

inquiry and trial in both the cases are significantly distinct and different. State of Rajasthan v.

B. K. Meena, (1996) 6 SCC 417.”

Hence, from perusal of the above quoted law, it is crystal clear that the submissions of the workman’s

union that the management should not have proceeded with the departmental inquiry on his acquittal in the

criminal proceedings is not acceptable. Accordingly, the issue No. 01 is decided in favour of the management.

Issue No. 02:-

12.

As regards, issue No. 2, it is apparent on the face of record that the workman participated in the

departmental proceedings and had been afforded all reasonable opportunity to defend himself; moreover,

acquittal of the workman in the criminal case has no effect on the ongoing departmental action. Also, the

workman’s union has not suggested at any juncture that the findings of the inquiry officer was perverse or

inconsistent with the evidence collected by him during the course of inquiry, I am of the considered view that

the findings of the inquiry officer were not perverse.

Issue No. 03:-

13.

Now taking up the third issue, It is well settled that the Labour Court has ample power under section

11-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to substitute a lesser punishment, taking into consideration the facts

and circumstances of the case. Moreover, the principle of proportionality calls for interference of this Court into

the punishment imposed by the management i.e. of removal in view of law in Joseph Solomon vs. Presiding

Officer, Labour Court, U.P., Dehradun & another 2012 (134) FLR 424.

14.

In the instant case the workman was charge sheeted for his alleged involvement in willfully causing

damage to the property of the Bank and for misbehaving and assaulting the Manager/staff and disorderly

behavior in the bank premises; which has been found partially proved by the inquiry officer and accordingly, the

workman had been issued a show cause notice regarding stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect.

15.

Hon’ble Apex Court in B.C. Chayurvedi v. Union of India, (1995) 6 SCC 749 while discussing about

the scope of judicial review, in disciplinary matters, has observed as under:

“The High Court/Tribunal, while exercising the power of judicial review, cannot normally substitute

its own conclusion on penalty and impose some other penalty. If the punishment imposed by the

disciplinary authority or the appellate authority shocks the conscience of the High Court/Tribunal, it

would appropriately mould the relief, either directing the disciplinary/appellate authority to

reconsider the penalty imposed, or to shorten the litigation, it may itself, in exceptional and rare

cases, imposed appropriate punishment with cogent reasons in support thereof.”

In DG, RPF vs. Sai Babu (2003) 4 SCC 331, Hon’ble Apex Court has observed that:

“6…………. Normally, the punishment imposed by a disciplinary authority should not be disturbed

by the High Court or a tribunal except in appropriate cases that too only after reaching a conclusion

that the punishment imposed is grossly or shockingly disproportionate, after examining all the

relevant factors including the nature of charges proved against, the past conduct, penalty imposed

earlier, the nature of duties assigned having due regard to their sensitiveness, exactness expected of

3092 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

an discipline required to be maintained, and the department/establishment which the delinquent

person concerned works.”

In United Commercial Bank vs. P.C. Kakkar (2003) 4 SCC 364 Hon’ble Apex Court on review of a

long line of cases and the principles of judicial review of administrative action under English law summarized

the legal position in the following words:

“11.

The common thread running through in all these decisions is that the court should not

interfere with the administrators’ decision unless it was illogical or suffers from procedural

imp0ropriety or was shocking to the conscience of the court, in the sense that it was in defiance of

logic or moral standards. In view of what has been stated in Wednesbury case the court would not

go into the correctness of the choice made by the administrator open to him and the court should not

substitute its decision to that of the administrator. The scope of judicial review is judicial review is

limited to the deficiency in decision-making process and not the decision.

12.

To put it differently, unless the punishment imposed by the disciplinary authority or the

appellate authority shocks the conscience of the court/tribunal, there is no scope for interference.

Further, to shorten litigation it may, in exceptional and rare cases, impose appropriate punishment

by recording cogent reasons in support thereof.”

In Union of India vs. S.S. Ahluwalia (2007) 7 SCC 257 Hon’ble Supreme Court reiterated the legal

position as follows:

“8.

……… The scope of judicial review in the matter of imposition of penalty as a result of

disciplinary proceedings is very limited. The court can interfere with the punishment only if it finds

the same to be shockingly disproportionate to the charges found to be proved.”

In State of Meghalaya v. Mecken Singh N. Marak (2008) 7 SCC 580 Hon’ble Supreme Court stated

that:

“The punishment imposed by the disciplinary authority or the appellate authority unless shocking to

the conscience of the court, cannot be subjected to judicial review.

16.

Hon’ble Apex Court in Administrator, Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli vs. Gulbhia M. Lad

(2010) 2 SCC (L&S) 101 has observed that

“The legal position is fairly well settled that while exercising the power of judicial review, the High

Court or a Tribunal cannot interfere with the discretion exercised by the disciplinary authority,

and/or on appeal the appellate authority with regard to the imposition of punishment unless such

discretion suffers from illegality or material procedural irregularity or that would shock the

conscience of the court/tribunal. The exercise of discretion in imposition of punishment by the

disciplinary authority or appellate authority is dependent on host of factors such as gravity of

misconduct, past conduct, the nature of duties assigned to the delinquent, responsibility of the

position that the delinquent holds, previous penalty, if any, and the discipline required to be

maintained in the department or establishment he works. Ordinarily the court or the tribunal would

not substitute its opinion on reappraisal of facts.

17.

Moreover, the Banks being financial institution; where the hard earned money of the public at large is

kept, and any disorderly atmosphere in the Bank premises may lead to loss to trust of the depositors on the

Banking institution; which may ultimately lead to collapse of financial system of the country and the same is not

permissible at all. Hon’ble Apex Court in (2011) 1 Supreme Court Cases (L&S) 721 has observed that:

“7.

It is now well settled that the courts will not act as an appellate court and reassess the

evidence led in the domestic enquiry, nor interfere on the ground that another view is possible on the

material on record. If the inquiry has been fairly and properly held and the findings are based on

evidence, the question of adequacy of the evidence or the reliable nature of the evidence will not be

grounds for interfering with the findings in departmental enquiries. Therefore the courts will not

interfere with findings of fact recorded in departmental inquiries, except where such findings are

based on no evidence or where they are clearly perverse. The test to find out perversity is to see

whether a tribunal acting reasonably could have arrived at such conclusion or findings, on the

material on record. The courts will however interfere with the findings in disciplinary matters, if

principles of natural justice or statutory regulations have been violated or if the order is found to be

arbitrary, capricious, mala fide or based on extraneous considerations.”

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3093

18.

In the instant case, the workman was punished with the punishment of stoppage of two increments with

cumulative effect. Hon’ble Bombay High Court in Western Coalfield Ltd. vs Santosh Kumar and others 2018

LLR 764 has observed that hurling of filthy abusive language at a senior officer justifies dismissal; whereas in

the present case, the workman had been punished with stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect,

probably the charges being partially proved. Therefore, under the facts and the circumstances of the case in

hand and considering the laws pronounced by Hon’ble Supreme Court and Hon’ble High Courts, there is no

justification in interfering with the punishment imposed upon the workman. Accordingly, the workman is not

entitled for any relief.

19.

Award as above.

Let two copies of this award be sent to the Ministry for publication.

LUCKNOW.

20th November, 2020

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 4 fnlEcj] 2020

.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14 ½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj ;wukbVsM bafM;k ba'kksjsal dEiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra=] lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; la- 1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la-

13@2007½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 04-12-2020 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-17012@18@2006-vkbZ vkj ¼,e½]

uohu oS|] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 4th December, 2020

S.O. 1068.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 13/2007) of the Cent. Govt. Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court No 1, Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of United

India Insurance Co. Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 04.12.2020.

[No. L-17012/18/2006-IR(M)]

NAVIN VAIDYA, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947

Reference: No. 13/2007

Employer in relation to the management of United India Insurance Company Ltd, Muzaffarpur

AND

Their workman

Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For Employer

: Sri A.K. Sarkar, Advocate.

For workman

: Sri D.K. Verma, Advocate.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:- Insurance

Dated : 27.08.2020

AWARD

By Order No.L-17012/18/2006 (IR(M)) dated 13.02.2007, the Central Government in the Ministry of

Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section

10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:

3094 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of United India Insurance Company, Divisional Office,

Muzaffarpur in terminating and not reinstating and regularizing the services of Sh. Ashok

Kumar Jha, S/o Late Lakshmeswar Jha, Vill Nawelpur Mshihraulia, PO Siho, PS-Sakra, Distt.

Muzaffarpur without complying Section 25 F of the ID Act, 1947 is legal and or justified and

expedient? If not, what relief Sh. Ashok Kumar Jha is entitled to?”

2.

The Tribunal in this matter has passed an award on 21/07/2014 holding that the action of the

management of United India Insurance Company in terminating and not regularizing the service of Shri Ashok

Kumar Jha S/o Late Lakshmeswar Jha is not legal and justified and therefore, the workman be regularized under

the management in the lowest grade soon after the publication of the award in the official Gazette.

The management being aggrieved by the said award filed a writ petition bearing C.W.J.C.

No. 6159/2015 before the Hon’ble Patna High Court Patna.

The Hon’ble Patna High Court, has been pleased to set aside the said award and remitted the matter to

the Tribunal to dispose of the same afresh expeditiously.

3.

After production of the order of Hon’ble Patna High Court passed in C.W.J.C. No. 6159/2015 both the

parties were heard again.

4.

The claim of the concerned workman Ashok Kumar Jha as per his written statement is as follows:-

That he had been appointed as sub-staff against permanent vacancy in September 1998 in United India

Insurance Company, Divisional Office, Muzaffarpur and he had been working since 1998 with unblemished

record of service with full satisfaction of the management but his service was terminated with effect from

28/07/2001 without following mandatory provision of law and principle of natural justice. He had discharged

his duties for more than 240 days in attendance in every year which ipso facto shows that he was engaged

against permanent vacancy and he acquired the status of permanent staff. He had represented before the

management on several occasion for his proper designation and status as well as wages but unfortunately

neither his representation was disposed of nor the same was rejected at any time. He had raised the dispute

before the Assistant Labour Commissioner, Patna against his termination of service by the management but the

matter was not settled. The management had exploited him and made discrimination against him by not

maintaining statutory documents.

He has made a prayer to pass an Award with the direction to the management to reinstate and

regularize his service from the date of his appointment with full back wages and other consequential benefits.

5.

On the other hand the case of the management as per its written statement is as follows:-

That the concerned workman had never been appointed and included in the panel of staff of the

Company at Divisional Office, Muzaffarpur. The management of United India Insurance Company is an

undertaking of Govt. of India and has codified rules and established procedure for recruitment of sub-staff or

anyone under the permanent establishment of the Company and the Divisional Manager, In-charge of the

Division doesn’t have any power or authority to induct any one even in the capacity of sub-staff. The concerned

workman was not working as sub-staff against the permanent vacancy and he had never been inducted in the

Company’s pay-roll by issuing any valid appointment or authority, so the question of his termination does not

arise. The concerned workman had never been employed or had been entrusted with any work, so question of

assigning any reason or complying any mandatory provision of law does not arise. In absence of any valid

employment, the retrenchment of concerned workman by the management does not arise. The concerned

workman had never imparted his service even for a continued period of seven days, so the question of

continuation of service for 240 days does not arise and subsequently non-compliance of section 25F and 25N of

Industrial Dispute Act is also irrelevant. The concerned workman had neither been employee nor been

terminated by the management, so the question of reinstatement and regularization of his service does not arise.

A prayer has been made to pass an Award in favour of the management.

6.

The concerned workman has filed rejoinder to the written statement filed by the management in which

he has almost denied all the averments.

7.

The concerned workman has examined only one witness. He is himself Ashok Kumar Jha. The WW-1

Ashok Kumar Jha has deposed before the Tribunal that the management had terminated him from his service

with effect from 28/07/2001 and since then he was out of employment. He has also deposed that he had been

appointed as sub-staff against permanent vacancy in September 1998 as per the provision of law and since then

he had been working as sub-staff against permanent vacancy continuously. He has also stated that he had

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3095

worked for more than 240 days in every year and he acquired the status of permanent staff but the management

was paying less wages than the wages prescribed for sub-staff. He has also stated that he had demanded proper

wages from the management but the management became annoyed and terminated his service illegally without

following mandatory provision of law and principle of natural justice. He has also stated that the management

had not issued any notice to him and had not paid any retrenchment compensation to him.

In the cross-examination he has stated that the documents filed by him had been signed and endorsed

by Sri S.N. Rub, Kishori Choudhary, Anil Raj Singh and Dr. Joher. He has also deposed that all the Officers

were working in the Divisional Office, Muzaffarpur from 1998 to 2001. He has further deposed that he had

applied for the job after an advertisement found on the notice board of the Divisional Office and only on verbal

interview he was appointed. He has further deposed that no appointment letter was given to him and he was

terminated from his job in July 2001. He has further deposed that he has produced photo copy of salary slip

voucher which are marked as W-1 series. He has further deposed that he had personally approached the

Regional Office at Patna but he had not received any reply in writing.

8.

The concerned workman has proved Photo Copy of receipts of payment made to him by United India

Insurance Company ltd, Divisional Office, Muzaffarpur which are marked as Exhibit W-1 series (80 sheets)-

9.

On the other hand the management has examined two witnesses. They are MW-1 Abhay Shankar and

MW-2 Vijay Das.

10.

The MW-1 Abhay Shankar has deposed that the concerned workman was never under any

establishment of the Company, so he does not come under the ambit of the Industrial Dispute Act. He has also

stated that the workman has not produced any iota of evidence substantiating his recruit in the capacity of class-

IV employee and in absence of employer-employee relationship there is no existence of Industrial Dispute. He

has also deposed that there is no material that the concerned workman was in continuous employment for a

period of not less than one year and the concerned workman has not produced any appointment letter or

document showing existence of any vacancy against which he was employed. He has further stated that the

concerned workman has produced only the receipts of payment received for serving water to the employees of

Muzaffarpur Division on payment of Rs. 25/- and there is no authentic document in support of the claim of the

concerned workman. He has further stated that the Company is a public undertaking and it is bound by various

rules and regulations in the matter of recruitment. He has also deposed that there are specific guidelines issued

by the Company to all the Officers from refraining engagement of any person other than employee of the

Company for performing of duties. He has further deposed that the payment receipts do not show the continuity

of service for even a week, meaning thereby his services had been hired for five working days only, so in this

way the continuity service of 240 days in a year is not established.

In the cross-examination he has deposed that he had seen all the payment receipts and payment had

been made not for the service but for goods and articles. He has also stated that petty articles could be

purchased without tender and he had not taken any receipt of the articles of petty nature articles purchased by

the Company. He has also stated that expenditures are generally maintained in General Expenditure Register

and he has not produced the General Expenditure Register of the Company before the Tribunal. He has also

deposed that he has not produced attendance register of employees for the period 1998 to 2001 and the original

receipts of the period 1988 to 2001 before the Tribunal. He has denied the suggestion that Ashok Kumar Jha

had worked in Divisional Office of United India Insurance Company, Muzaffarpur from 1998 to 2001 and he

had attended his office for 240 days in every year.

11.

The MW-2 Vijay Das has deposed before the Tribunal that he was posted as Class-III employee at

Muzaffarpur Divisional Office of the Company during the period of 1988 till his continuation of his tenure. He

has also deposed that he had put his signature on the attendance register maintained for the attendance for Class-

III and Class-IV employee of Division from the year 1988 to 2006 and he has proved attendance register for the

period of January 1999 to December 2002 which has been marked as Exhibit M-1 series. He has also deposed

that in the attendance register there is neither signature nor marking of attendance of the concerned workman.

He has further stated that the concerned workman had neither been inducted nor his services were utilized by

the Company. He has also deposed that the payment receipts had never been brought to his knowledge. He has

also deposed that there was no vacancy of Class-IV staff in Divisional Office as per sanctioned strength.

In the cross-examination he has deposed that permanent employee of the Company used to mark their

attendance on the attendance register. He has also stated that there was no certificate of any Officer of the

Company on this register. He has also stated that on some pages there is signature of Competent Officer and on

some pages there is no signature of Competent Authority. He has further deposed that this register has been

prepared from original register. He has further deposed that the all the expenditure of the Company are

3096 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

maintained in the ledger which is called SS2 register. He has also deposed that the attendance of daily wager are

not marked on the attendance register, i.e. Exhibit M-1. He has also deposed that he has no knowledge whether

the employees of daily wager were paid as per Minimum Wages Act or not. He has further deposed that Ashok

Kumar Jha was seen in office time to time as a water supplier.

12.

The management has proved photo copy of attendance register of class III and class IV employees of

the period 04/01/1999 to 01/01/2003 of United India Insurance Company ltd, Divisional Office, Muzaffarpur

which are marked as Exhibit M-1 series.

13.

The learned lawyer of the workman has submitted before the Tribunal that the workman namely Ashok

Kumar Jha was working in United India Insurance Company, Divisional Office, Muzaffarpur since September

1998 against a permanent vacancy but his service was terminated with effect from 28/07/2001without

complying the provision of Section 25 F of I.D. Act. He has also argued that the concerned workman had

submitted several representation before the management for his regularisation but no decision was taken on his

representation, so he had been illegally and arbitrarily terminated from the service without complying principle

of natural justice. He has made prayer for reinstatement of the concerned workman and payment of full back

wages with consequential benefits.

14.

On the other hand the learned lawyer of the management has submitted that the concerned workman

had never been employed as a subordinate staff and there was no employer-employee relationship between the

management and the concerned workman. He has also argued that the concerned workman was employed as a

daily wager and he was paid accordingly. He has further submitted that there was no permanent vacancy of

class-IV employees in the Company. He has also argued that there are rules and guidelines for recruitment of

staff in the Company. He has lastly argued that there is no merit in this reference case and the case may be

dismissed. He has relied on the decision of Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court as reported in 2019 LLR

969.

15.

Now, the only point of consideration in this case is whether the action of the management of United

India Insurance Company, Divisional Office, Muzaffarpur in terminating and not reinstating and regularizing

the services of Sh. Ashok Kumar Jha without complying of section 25 F of I.D. Act is legal or justified and to

what relief he is entitled.

FINDINGS

16.

It is the claim of concerned workman namely Ashok Kumar Jha that he had been appointed as a sub-

staff against permanent vacancy in United India Insurance Company, Divisional Office, Muzaffarpur in

September 1998 but he was terminated from the service w.e.f. 28/07/2001 without following the provision of

25F of the I.D. Act.

It is further claim of concerned workman that a direction be issued to management for her reinstatement and

regularization of his service will full back wages and consequential benefits.

17.

On the other hand it is the case of the management that the concerned workman had never been

appointed by the United India Insurance Company Divisional Office, Muzaffarpur as sub-staff and he had not

served the Company continuously for 240 days in twelve calendar months, so there is question of his

termination by the Company.

18.

Now in the light of pleading of both the parties the Tribunal will examine the oral and documentary

evidence available in the record.

19.

The most competent witness in this is WW-1, Ashok Kumar Jha who has supported its case by stating

therein that he had been appointed as sub-staff against the permanent vacancy in September,1998 as per

provision of law and since then he had been working against permanent vacancy continuously but his service

was terminated w.e.f. 28/07/2001 without following the mandatory provisions of law. He has also deposed that

he had continuously worked in the Company for more than 240 days in every year. In the cross-examination he

has admitted that no appointment letter was issued to him and he was paid his remuneration through receipts

which are Exhibit –W-1 series.

The MW-1, Abhay Shankar in his evidence has deposed that the concerned workman has not produced

any documents showing his appointment, and there is no material to show that the concerned workman was in

continuous employment for a period of not less than one year. He has also deposed that the concerned workman

has produced only receipt of payments and there is no authentic documents in support of his claim. He has also

stated that the payment receipts only show the continuity of service for even a week meaning thereby that his

service had been hired for five working days only. In the cross-examination he has deposed that the payment

receipt was not only for the service but for the goods and articles.

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3097

The MW-2, Vijay Das has proved the photo copy register of attendance for class III and class IV

employee of for the period of January, 1999 to 2002 and he has deposed that in the said attendance register

there is neither signature nor signature mark of attendance of the concerned workman. He has also stated that

the concerned workman had neither been inducted into service nor his services were utilized by the Company.

In the Cross-examination he has deposed that the permanent employee of the Company used to mark their

attendance on the register.

20.

After analyzing documentary evidence it appears that the Exhibit W-1 series are the photo copy of

receipts of payment of labour charge made to the concerned workman which are altogether eighty sheets in

number. It further appears that all the receipts of payment are of labour charges of different years. It appears

that the five payment receipts are of year 1998, forty payment receipts are of year 1999, thirty one payment

receipts are of year 2000 and four payment receipts are of year 2001. It further appears that in most of the

payment receipts it has been mentioned that payment had been made for serving water for four days or five

days only at the rate of Rs. 25/- per day. Further after calculating the working of concerned workman it comes

to about 24 days in 1998, 196 days in 1999, 143 days in 2000, and 18 days in 2001 Moreover the Exhibit W-1

series does not show that the concerned workman had worked in United India Insurance Company, Muzaffarpur

for 240 days in twelve calendar months.

The M-1 series which is photocopy of attendance register of class III and class IV employee of

Muzaffarpur Division of United India Insurance Company of period 04/01/1999 to 20/12/2002 and it does not

show the name of concerned workman namely Ashok Kumar Jha as employee of the company and there is no

mark of his attendance in the register.

21.

Now in this case the concerned workman has not produced any appointment letter and in the cross-

examination he has admitted that no appointment letter was issued to him by the United India Insurance

Company. Further the concerned workman has not produced any documents showing advertisement issued by

the United India Insurance Company for appointment on the post of sub-staff in the Company. Further the

Exhibit W-1 series does not show that the concerned workman had continuously worked for 240 days in twelve

calendar months. Additionally the concerned workman has not produced any document to show that there was

any vacancy of sub staff and he had been appointed against the said permanent vacancy of the Company.

22.

At this stage it is required to mention here that u/s 25B of I.D. Act there is definition of continuous

service and u/s 25F of the I.D. Act conditions precedent to retrenchment of workman has been mentioned.

Section 25B of I.D. Act reads as follows:-

25-B. Definition of continuous service – For the purpose of this Chapter,-

(1) a workman shall be said to be in continuous service for a period if he is, for that period, in uninterrupted

service, including service which may be interrupted on account of sickness or authorized leave or an accident or

a strike which is not illegal, or a lock-out or a cessation of work which is not due to any fault on the part of the

workman;

(2) Where a workman is not in continuous service within the meaning of clause (1) for a period of one year or

six months, he shall be deemed to be in continuous service under an employer-

(a) for a period one year, if the workman, during a period of twelve calendar months preceding the date

with reference to which calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the employer for not

less than –

(i) one hundred and ninety days in the case of a workman employed below ground in a mine; and

(ii) two hundred and forty days, in any other case;

(b)…………………………………..

Further, Section 25F of the I.D. Act reads as follows:-

25-F Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen- No workman employed in any industry

who has been in continuous service for not less than one year under an employer shall be retrenched by that

employer until-

(a)

The workman has been given one month’s notice in writing indicating the reasons for

retrenchment and the period of notice has expired, or the workman has been paid in lieu of such

notice, wages for the period of the notice:

3098 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 12, 2020/AGRAHAYANA 21, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(b)

The workman has been paid, at the time of retrenchment, compensation which shall be

equivalent to fifteen days’ average pay (for Every completed year of continuous service) or any

part thereof in excess of six months; and

(c)

Notice in the prescribed manner is served on the appropriate Government (or such authority as

may be specified by the appropriate Government by notification in the Official Gazette.)

23.

Now in this case there is no documentary evidence that the concerned workman had worked for 240

days in twelve calendar months in United India Insurance Company Divisional Office, Muzaffarpur , so there

is no continuous service of the concerned workman as per definition of continuous service mentioned in u/s

25B of the I.D. Act.

24.

In view of above discussions the Tribunal comes to the conclusion that the concerned workman had

not worked continuously for 240 days in a twelve calendar months in a year, so he had not served the United

India Insurance Company Divisional Office, Muzaffarpur continuously for not less than one year, so the

provisions of section 25F of the Industrial Dispute Act is not applicable in this case.

25.

Hence, the action of the management of United India Insurance Company Divisional Office,

Muzaffarpur in terminating the service of concerned workman namely Ashok Kumar Jha is legal, justified and

expedient.

26.

Now, the next point of consideration in this case is whether the concerned workman is entitled for

reinstatement and regularisation of service in United India Insurance Company, Divisional Office,

Muzaffarpur?

27.

In this regard the concerned workman WW-1, Ashok Kumar Jha has deposed that he had worked in

the United India Insurance Company, Divisional Office, Muzaffarpur on his appointment as sub staff against

permanent vacancy in September , 1998 and had worked continuously and regularly till his termination on

28/07/2001.

On the other hand MW-1, Abhay Shankar has deposed that concerned workman had never been appointed as

sub staff in the office of the United India Insurance Company, Divisional Office, Muzaffarpur and he had been

hired for five working days in a week only.

Further the MW-2, Vijay Das who has proved the attendance register of class-III and class-IV

employees of Divisional Office, Muzaffarpur for the period of January 1999 to December 2002 has deposed

that there is no mark of attendance of concerned employee on the aforesaid register.

28.

Moreover the Exhibit W-1 series are the payment receipt for the year 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2001 for

serving water for four or five days at the rate Rs. 25/- per day. Further the M-1 series does not show the name of

the concerned workman on the attendance register the period January 1999 to December 2002.

29.

It is required to mention here that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Hindustan Aeronautics

Ltd. Vs. Dan Bahadur Singh, reported in (2007) 6 SCC 207, has been pleased to hold as under:-

“14. The next question which requires consideration is whether completion of 240 days in a year confers

any right on an employee or workman to claim regularisation in service. In Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad

vs. Anil Kumar Mishra it was held that the completion of 240 days’ work does not confer the right to

regularisation under the Industrial Disputes Act. It merely imposes certain obligations on the employer at

the time of termination of the services. In M.P. Housing Board vs. Manoj Shrivastava (para 17) after

referring to several earlier decisions it has been reiterated that it is well settled that only because a

person had been working for more than 240 days, he does not derive any legal right to be regularised in

serivee. This view has been reiterated in Gangadhar Pillai vs. Siemens Ltd. The same question has been

examined in considerable detail with reference to an employee working in a government company in

Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs. Workmen and paras 34 and 35 of the report are being

reproduced below:( 2007 (1) SCC p.408)

“34. Thus, it is well settled that there is no right vested in any daily wager to seek regularisation.

Regularisation can only be done in accordance with the rules and not dehors the rules. In the case of E.

Ramakrishnan v. State of Kerala this Court held that there can be no regularisation dehors the rules. The

same view was taken in Kishore (Dr.) v. State of Maharashtra and Union of India v. Bishamber Dutt. The

direction issued by the services Tribunal for regularising the services of persons who had not been

appointed on regular basis in accordance with the rules was set aside although the petitioner had been

working regularly for a long time.

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम् बर 12, 2020/अग्रिायण 21, 1942

3099

35. In Surinder Singh Jamwal (Dr.) v. State of J&K it was held that ad hoc appointment does not give any

right for regularization as regularization is governed by the statutory rules.””

30.

The Hon’ble Jharkhand High Court has been pleased to observe in L.P.A No. 268/2012 which is as

under:-

“(xiv) Be that as it may, even assuming without admitting that this appellant has worked more than 240

days in couple of years, then also, his services cannot be regularized. 240 days’ working is not a magic

bond which converts illegal appointment into the legal appointment. In fact, 240 days working has

nothing to do with the regularization at all. 240 days working has got reference under Section 25-B of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for calculation of continuous years of service and nothing beyond that.

Unnecessarily several times the Labour Court or the Industrial Courts are committing an error that if any

worker has completed 240 days, their services should be regularized. In fact, there is no casual

connection at all between the working of 240 days and right of regularization. Illegality in the

appointment cannot be diluted by the working of 240 days. Illegality in the appointment continues, even if,

the worker has worked for 240 days.”

The Hon’ble Jharkhand High Court has been further pleased to hold as follows:-

“Whenever any employment is given unauthorizedly, in the respondent-UCO Bank, Hirapur, Dhanbad,

such type of employment cannot be converted into a regular employment unless there are rules for

regularization or scheme for regularization. In the facts of the present case, there are no rules of

regularization nor there is any scheme of regularization floated by the UCO Bank. In absence of such

type of law, the charity shown by the Court will be cruelty to others. If such type regularization is allowed

by the Courts, it will provide encouragement to those who are adorning high-ranking administrative

position to give illegal appointment and later on, to get them regularized by the orders of the Courts. A

thing which cannot be done directly, can never be done indirectly. If no employment can be given without

there being any advertisement and without there being any recruitment process, the Court cannot be a

party to illegal regularization of such employee.”

31.

It is relevant to mention here that it has already been held by this Tribunal that the concerned

workman had not worked for 240 days in twelve calendar months in the United India Insurance Company,

Divisional Office, Muzaffarpur.

32.

In view of such fact and in view of decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court and Hon’ble Jharkhand High

Court it is settled that the concerned workman namely Ashok Kumar Jha even, if he would had worked for 240

days in twelve calendar months, is not entitled for reinstatement and regularization of his service in United

India Insurance Company, Divisional Office, Muzaffarpur.

33.

Hence, the following Award is rendered:-

“The action of the management of United India Insurance Company, Divisional Office, Muzaffarpur

was justified in terminating and not reinstating and regularizing the services of the concerned

workman namely Sri Ashok Kumar Jha as mentioned in the schedule of reference without complying

section 25 of the I.D. Act 1947 is legal, justified and expedient . Consequently the concerned workman

is not entitled for any relief.”

This is the Award of this Tribunal.

DINESH KUMAR SINGH, Presiding Officer

Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.

SURENDER

MAHADASAM

Digitally signed by SURENDER

MAHADASAM

Date: 2020.12.19 12:21:30

+05'30'