6092 GI/2020

(3173)

रजिस्ट्री सं. डी.एल. (एन) 04/0007/2003—05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

xxxGIDHxxx

xxxGIDExxx

प्राजिकार से प्रकाजित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप् ताजिक

WEEKLY

सं. 48]

नई दिल् ली, दिसम् बर 20—दिसम् बर 26, 2020, िजनवार/ अग्रिायण 29— पौष 5, 1942

No. 48] NEW DELHI, DECEMBER 20 – DECEMBER 26, 2020, SATURDAY/AGRAHAYANA 29–PAUSHA 5, 1942

इस भाग में जभन् न पष्‍ सं्‍ या िी िाती िज जिससे दक यि पष क संकलन के प प में र ा िा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II— ण् ड 3—उप- ण् ड (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों (रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर) द्वारा िारी दकए गए सांजवजिक आिेि और अजिसूचनाएं

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

कोयला मंत्रालय

नई दि ल् ली, 23 दिसम् बर, 2020

का.आ. 1092.—केन्रीय सरकार को यि प्रतीत िोता िज दक, इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उजल्लज त पररक्षेत्र

की भूजम में कोयला अजभप्राप्त दकए िाने की संभावना िज ;

और, रे ांक सं्‍या एनसीएल/मु्‍यालय/भूजम और रािस्ट्व/2020/83, तारी 24 अगस्ट्त, 2020 को उक्त

अनुसूची में वर्णित भूजम का क्षेत्र अंतर्विष्ट दकया गया िज, का जनरीक्षण मिाप्रबंिक (भूजम और रािस्ट्व), नाििनि

कोलफील््स जलजमटेड, जिला ससंगरौली- 486889, मध्य प्रिेि के कायािलय में या मिाप्रबंिक ( ोि प्रभाग), सेंरल

माईन प्लासनंग एण्ड जडज़ाइन इंस्ट्टीट्यूट जलजमटेड, गोंडवाना प्लेस, कांके रोड, रांची-834001, झार ंड के कायािलय

सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-01012021-224062

CG-DL-W-01012021-224062

3174 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 26, 2020/PAUSHA 5, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

में या कोयला जनयंत्रक, 1, काउंजसल िाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता-700001 के कायािलय में या जिला कलेक्टर, जिला

ससंगरौली- 486889, मध्य प्रिेि के कायािलय में दकया िा सकता िज ;

अतः,अब, केन्रीय सरकार, कोयला िारक क्षेत्र (अििन और जवकास) अजिजनयम, 1957 (1957 का 20)

(जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अजिजनयम किा गया िज) की िारा 4 की उपिारा (1) द्वारा प्रित िजक्तयों का प्रयोग

करते हुए, उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूजम में कोयले का पूवेक्षण करने के अपने आिय की सूचना िेती िज ।

उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूजम में जितबद्ध कोई व्यजक्त –

(i)

संपूणि भूजम या उसके दकसी भाग या ऐसी भूजम में या उसके ऊपर दकसी अजिकार के अििन पर आक्षेप

कर सकेगा ; अ वा

(ii) उक्त अजिजनयम की िारा 6 के अिीन िाररत दकसी नुकसानी या उसकी िारा 4 की उप-िारा (3) के

अिीन िाररत िोने वाले नुकसान की संभावना के जलए प्रजतकर का िावा कर सकेगा ; अ वा

(iii) उक्त अजिजनयम की िारा 13 की उप-िारा (1) के अिीन समाप्त िो गयी पूवेक्षण अनुज्ञजप्तयों के संबंि में

या िारा 13 की उप-िारा (4) के अिीन समाप्त िो गए नन पट्टे के जलए प्रजतकर का िावा कर सकेगा

और उक्त अजिजनयम की िारा 13 की उपिारा (1) के ंड (i) से ंड (iv) में जवजनर्ििष्ट मिों के संबंि में

उपगत व्यय को उपिर्िित करने के जलए उपरोक्त भूजम से संबंजित सभी मानजचत्रों, चाटों और अन्य

िस्ट्तावेिों को, इस अजिसूचना के रािपत्र में प्रकािन की तारी से नब्बे दिन के भीतर, मिाप्रबंिक

(भूजम और रािस्ट्व), नाििनि कोलफील््स जलजमटेड, जिला ससंगरौली – 486889, मध्य प्रिेि को पररित्त

कर सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

जनगािी डीप जवस्ट्तार, ब्लॉक बी जवस्ट्तार और जबिुल जियोलाजिकल ब्लॉक

जनगािी जवस्ट्तार ओसीपी िेतु

नाििनि कोलफील््स जलजमटेड, ससंगरौली

जिला- ससंगरौली (मध्य प्रिेि)

[ रे ांक सं्‍या एनसीएल/मु्‍यालय/भूजम और रािस्ट्व/2020/83, तारी 24 अगस्ट्त, 2020 ]

सभी अजिकार:

काश्तकारी और सरकारी भूजम :

ग्राम का नाम

पटवारी सर्किल

सं्‍या

तिसील

जिला

क्षेत्रफल

(िेक्टेयर में)

रटप्पजणयां

मुिेर

00003

ससंगरौली नगर

ससंगरौली

319.787

भाग

कुल: = 319.787 िेक्टेयर (लगभग)

या 790.194 एकड़ (लगभग)

वन भूजम :

क्रम

सं्‍या

वन कक्ष क्रमांक

वन परीक्षेत्र का नाम

जिला

क्षेत्रफल

(िेक्टेयर में)

रटप्पजणयां

आरजक्षत वन (आरएफ) 271

(भाग)

वजढ़न और गोरबी

ससंगरौली

15.188

भाग

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 26, 2020/पौष 5, 1942

3175

आरजक्षत वन (आरएफ) 272

(भाग)

वजढ़न और गोरबी

ससंगरौली

136.535

भाग

आरजक्षत वन (आरएफ) 273

(भाग)

वजढ़न और गोरबी

ससंगरौली

51.769

भाग

आरजक्षत वन (आरएफ) 274

(भाग)

वजढ़न और गोरबी

ससंगरौली

41.044

भाग

कुल : 244.536 िेक्टेयर (लगभग)

या 604.248 एकड़ (लगभग)

कुल िोड़ : 319.787 िेक्टेयर + 244.536 िेक्टेयर = 564.323 िेक्टेयर (लगभग)

या 790.194 एकड़ + 604.248 एकड़ = 1394.442 एकड़ (लगभग)

सीमा वणिन :

क- : रे ा ग्राम मुिेर में जनगािी पररयािना की पूवि अर्िित भूजम की सीमा पर जबन्िु ‘क’ से आरंभ िोती िज और

ग्राम मुिेर त ा ग्राम मेढ़ौली से िोकर गुिरती िज, यिी रे ा जनगािी डीप जवस्ट्तार ब्लॉक की पूवि अर्िित

भूजम की सीमा से गुिरती िज त ा ग्राम मेढ़ौली में जबन्िु ’ ’ पर जमलती िज।

-ग : रे ा जबन्िु ‘ ’ से आरंभ िोती िज और ग्राम मेढ़ौली से िोकर गुिरती िज, यिी रे ा जनगािी डीप जवस्ट्तार

ब्लॉक की पूवि अर्िित भूजम की सीमा से गुिरती िज त ा ग्राम मेढ़ौली में जबन्िु ’ग’ पर जमलती िज।

ग-घ :

रे ा जबन्िु ‘ग’ से आरंभ िोती िज और ग्राम मेढ़ौली से िोकर गुिरती िज, यिी रे ा ियंत -मेिरौली वेस्ट्ट

(डीप ना ि साइड) ब्लॉक की पूवि अर्िित भूजम से िोकर गुिरती िज त ा ग्राम मेढ़ौली में जबन्िु ‘घ’ पर

जमलती िज।

घ-ङ :

रे ा जबन्िु ‘घ’ से आरंभ िोती िज और ग्राम मेढ़ौली से िोकर गुिरती िज, यिी रे ा जनगािी डीप जवस्ट्तार

ब्लॉक और जबिुल ब्लॉक से िोकर गुिरती िज त ा ससंगरौली वन प्रभाग के वजढन और गोरबी वन पररक्षेत्र के

वन कक्ष क्रमांक आर.एफ. 272 में जबन्िु ‘ङ’ पर जमलती िज।

ङ-च : रे ा जबन्िु ‘ङ’ से आरंभ िोती िज और ससंगरौली वन प्रभाग के वजढन एवं गोरबी वन पररक्षेत्र के वन कक्ष

क्रमांक आर.एफ. 272 से िोकर गुिरती िज, यिी रे ा जबिुल ब्लॉक और ब्लॉक बी जवस्ट्तार ब्लॉक से िोकर

गुिरती िज त ा ग्राम मुिेर में जबन्िु ‘च’ पर जमलती िज।

च-छ : रे ा जबन्िु ‘च’ से आरंभ िोती िज और ग्राम मुिेर से िोकर गुिरती िज, यिी रे ा ब्लॉक बी जवस्ट्तार ब्लॉक से

िोकर गुिरती िज त ा ग्राम मुिेर में जबन्िु ‘छ’ पर जमलती िज।

छ-ि : रे ा जबन्िु ‘छ’ से आरंभ िोती िज और ग्राम मुिेर से िोकर गुिरती िज, यिी रे ा ब्लॉक बी जवस्ट्तार ब्लॉक से

िोकर गुिरती िज त ा ग्राम मुिेर में जबन्िु ‘ि’ पर जमलती िज।

ि-क : रे ा जबन्िु ‘ि’ से आरंभ िोती िज और ग्राम मुिेर से िोकर गुिरती िज, यिी रे ा ब्लॉक बी जवस्ट्तार ब्लॉक से

िोकर गुिरती िज त ा ग्राम मुिेर में प्रारंजभक जबन्िु ‘क’ पर जमलती िज।

[फा. सं. 43015/20/2020-एलए एण्ड आईआर]

राम जिरोमजण सरोि, उप सजचव

3176 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 26, 2020/PAUSHA 5, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi, the 23rd December, 2020

S. O. 1092.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that coal is likely to be obtained from the

land in the locality described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

And, whereas, the plan bearing number NCL/HQ/Land and Revenue/2020/83, dated the 24^th August,

2020 containing the details of the area of land described in the said Schedule may be inspected at the office of

the General Manager (Land and Revenue), Northern Coalfields Limited, District Singrauli-486889, Madhya

Pradesh or at the office of General Manager (Exploration Division), Central Mine planning and Design Institute

Limited, Gondwana Place, Kanke Road, Ranchi-834001, Jharkhand or at the office of the Coal Controller, 1,

Council House Street, Kolkata-700001 or at the office of the District Collector, District Singrauli, Madhya

Pradesh-486889 ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section(1) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing

Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the

Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal from the land described in the said

Schedule.

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may-

(i) object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or of any rights in or over the said land;

(ii)

claim compensation under section 6 of the said Act for any damage caused or likely to be caused by

any action taken under sub-section (3) of section 4 of the said Act; or

(iii) claim compensation under sub-section (1) of section 13 of the said Act in respect of the prospecting

licenses ceasing to have effect or under sub-section (4) of section 13 of the said Act, for mining

lease ceasing to have effect and deliver all maps, charts and other documents relating to the

aforesaid land to show the expenditure incurred in respect of items specified in clauses (i) to (iv) of

sub-section (1) of section 13 of the said Act,

to the office of the General Manager (Land and Revenue), Northern Coalfields Limited, District Singrauli-

486889, Madhya Pradesh, within a period of ninety days from the date of publication of this notification in the

Official Gazette.

SCHEDULE

NIGAHI DIP EXTENSION, BLOCK B EXTENSION AND BIJUL GEOLOGICAL BLOCKS

For Nigahi Expansion OCP

Northern Coalfields Limited, Singrauli

District - Singrauli (Madhya Pradesh)

[Plan bearing number NCL/HQ/Land and Revenue/2020/83, dated the 24^th August, 2020]

ALL RIGHTS :

Tenancy and Government Land :

Name

Village

Patwari Circle

number

Tehsil

District

Area

(in

hectares)

Remarks

Muher

00003

Singrauli Nagar

Singrauli

319.787

Part

Total : 319.787 hectares (approximately)

or 790.194 acres (approximately)

Forest Land :

Sr.

No.

Forest

Compartment

number

Name

Forest

Range

District

Area

(in

hectares)

Remarks

Reserved Forest (RF) 271

(P)

Waidhan and Gorbi

Singrauli

15.188

Part

Reserved Forest (RF) 272

(P)

Waidhan and Gorbi

Singrauli

136.535

Part

Reserved Forest (RF) 273

(P)

Waidhan and Gorbi

Singrauli

51.769

Part

Reserved Forest (RF) 274

(P)

Waidhan and Gorbi

Singrauli

41.044

Part

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 26, 2020/पौष 5, 1942

3177

Total = 244.536 hectares (approximately)

or 604.248 acres (approximately)

Grand Total: 319.787 hectares + 244.536 hectares = 564.323 hectares (approximately)

or 790.194 acres + 604.248 acres = 1394.442 acres (approximately)

Boundary Description:

A-B :

The line starts at point ‘A’ in Muher village on the boundary of the previously acquired land of Nigahi

Project and passes through Muher village and Medhauli village and same line passes over the boundary

of the previously acquired land of Nigahi Dip extension block and meets at point ‘B’ in Medhauli

Village.

B-C :

The line starts at point ‘B’ and passes through Medhauli village and same line passes over the boundary

of the previously acquired land of Nigahi Dip extension block and meets at point ‘C’ in Medhauli

village.

C-D :

The line starts at point ‘C’ and passes through the Medhauli village and same line passes over the

boundary of the previously acquired land of Jayant-Mehrauli West (Dip North Side) block and meets at

point ‘D’ in Medhauli Village.

D-E :

The line starts from the point ‘D’ and passes through Medhauli village and same line passes through

Nigahi Dip Extension block and Bijul block and meets at point ‘E’ in the Singrauli division range

Waidhan and Gorbi , forest compartment No. RF 272.

E-F :

The line starts from point ‘E’ and passes through Singrauli division Range Waidhan and Gorbi , forest

compartment No. RF 272. and same line passes over Bijul block and Block B extension block and

meets at point ‘F’ in the Muher village.

F-G :

The line starts at point ‘F’ and passes through Muher village and same line passes over Block B

extension block and meets at point ‘G’ in Muher village.

G-H : The line starts at point ‘G’ and passes through Muher village and same line passes over Block B

extension block and meets at point ‘H’ in Muher village.

H-A : The line starts at point ‘H’ and passes through Muher village and same line passes over Block B

extension block and meets at starting point ‘A’ in Muher village.

[F. No. 43015/20/2020-LA&IR]

RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Dy. Secy.

नई दि ल् ली, 23 दिसम् बर, 2020

का.आ. 1093.—केन् रीय सरकार ने कोयला िारक क्षेत्र (अििन और जवकास) अजिजनयम, 1957 (1957 का

20) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश् चात् उक् त अजिजनयम किा गया िज) की िारा 4 की उपिारा (1) के अिीन भारत सरकार

ने कोयला मंत्रालय द्वारा िारी की गई अजिसूचना सं्‍ यांक का. आ. 530, तारी 16 िुलाई, 2020, िो भारत के

रािपत्र, भाग II, ण् ड 3, उप- ण् ड (ii), तारी 18 िुलाई, 2020 में प्रकाजित की गई ी, उस अजिसूचना से

उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में जवजनर्िि्‍ ट पररक्षेत्र की भूजम में जिसका माप 297.61 िेक् टर (लगभग) या 735.39 एकड़

(लगभग) िज, कोयले का पूवेक्षण करने के अपने आिय की सूचना िी ी ;

और केन् रीय सरकार का यि समािान िो गया िज दक इस अजिसूचना से संलग् न अनुसूची में जवजित उक् त

भूजम के भाग में कोयला अजभप्राप् त िज ;

अत:, अब, केन् रीय सरकार उक् त अजिजनयम की िारा 7 की उपिारा (1) द्वारा प्रित् त िजक् तयों का प्रयोग

करते हुए, इससे संलग् न अनुसूची में वर्णिंत 230.41 िेक् टर (लगभग) या 569.34 एकड़ (लगभग) माप वाली भूजम में

या उस पर के सभी अजिकार का अििन करने के अपने आिय की सूचना िेती िज ;

3178 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 26, 2020/PAUSHA 5, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

रटप् पण 1 : इस अजिसूचना के अिीन आने वाले क्षेत्र के रे ांक सं्‍ यांक सी-I(ई) III / एफयूआर/1020/963,

तारी 10 अक्तूबर, 2020 का जनरीक्षण कलेक् टर, जिला नागपुर, मिारा्‍ र के कायािलय में या कोयला जनयंत्रक, 1,

काउंजसल िाउस स्ट् रीट, कोलकाता- 700 001 के कायािलय में या जवभागाध् यक्ष, वेस्ट् टनि कोलफील् ्स जलजमटेड, रािस्ट् व

जवभाग, कोल इस्ट् टेट, जसजवल लाईन् स, नागपुर - 440 001 (मिारा्‍ र) के कायािलय में दकया िा सकता िज ;

रटप् पण 2 : उक् त अजिजनयम की उपिारा 8 के उपबंिों की ओर ध् यान आकष्‍ ट दकया िाता िज, जिसमें जनम् नजलज त

उपबंि िज :-

‘‘8. अििन की बाबत् आपजत्तयां.-(1) कोई व् यजक् त िो दकसी भूजम में, जिसकी बाबत् िारा 7 के अिीन

अजिसूचना जनकाली गई िज, जितबद्ध िज, अजिसूचना के िारी दकए िाने से तीस दिन के भीतर सम् पूणि भूजम या उसके

दकसी भाग या ऐसी भूजम में या उस पर के दकन् िीं अजिकारों का अििन दकए िाने के बारे में आपजत् त कर सकेगा ।

स्ट् प्‍ टीकरण.- इस िारा के अंतगित यि आपजत् त निीं मानी िाएगी, दक कोई व् यजक् त दकसी भूजम में कोयला उत् पािन के

जलए स्ट् वयं नन संदक्रयाएं करना चािता िज और ऐसी संदक्रयाएं केन् रीय सरकार या दकसी अन् य व् यजक् त को निीं करनी

चाजिए ।

(2)

उप-िारा (1) के अिीन प्रत् येक आपजत् त सक्षम प्राजिकारी को जलज त प प में की िाएगी और सक्षम

अजिकारी, आपजत् तकताि को स्ट् वयं सुने िाने का या जवजि व् यवसायी द्वारा सुनवाई का अवसर िेगा और ऐसी सभी

आपजत् तयों को सुनने के पश् चात् और ऐसी अजतररक् त िांच, यदि कोई िो, करने के पश् चात् िो वि आवश् यक समझता

िज, वि या तो िारा 7 की उपिारा (1) के अिीन अजिसूजचत भूजम के या ऐसी भूजम में या उस पर के अजिकारों के

संबंि में एक ररपोटि या ऐसी भूजम के जवजभन् न टुकड़ों या ऐसी भूजम में या उस पर के अजिकारों के संबंि में आपजत् तयों

पर अपनी जसफाररिों और उसके द्वारा की गई कायिवािी के अजभले सजित जवजभन् न ररपोटि केन् रीय सरकार को

उसके जवजनश् चय के जलए िेगा ।

(3)

इस िारा के प्रयोिनों के जलए वि व् यजक् त दकसी भूजम में जितबद्ध समझा िाएगा िो प्रजतकर में जित का

िावा करने का िकिार िो, यदि भूजम या दकसी ऐसी भूजम में या उस पर के अजिकार इस अजिजनयम के अिीन अर्िित

कर जलए िाते िज ।

रटप् पण 3: केन् रीय सरकार ने कोयला जनयंत्रक 1, काउंजसल िाउस स्ट् रीट, कोलकाता - 700 001 को उक् त अजिजनयम

की िारा 3 के अिीन सं्‍ यांक का. आ. 2519, तारी 27 मई, 1983, िो भारत के रािपत्र, भाग II, ंड 3,

उप ंड (ii) में तारी 11 िून, 1983 में प्रकाजित की गयी ी, द्वारा सक्षम प्राजिकारी के प प में जनयुक् त दकया िज ।

अनुसूची

दिनेि (मकरिोकडा - III) जवस्ट्तार जववषत ान

उमरेड़ क्षेत्र

जिला नागपुर, मिारा्‍ र

(रे ांक सं्‍ या सी- I(ई) III /एफयूआर/1020/963, तारी 10 अक्तूबर, 2020)

सभी अजिकार:

भाग - I

ग्राम का नाम

पटवारी

सर्किल

सं्‍ या

तिसील

जिला

क्षेत्रफल िेक् टर में

कुल

रटप् पणी

अजभिषजत

सरकारी

वन

ििेगांव

उमरेड

नागपुर

28.05

1.33

20.25

49.63

भाग

कुल :

28.05

1.33

20.25

49.63

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 26, 2020/पौष 5, 1942

3179

भाग - II

ग्राम का नाम

पटवारी

सर्किल

सं्‍ या

तिसील

जिला

क्षेत्रफल िेक् टर में

कुल

रटप् पणी

अजभिषजत

सरकारी

वन

मकरिोकड़ा

उमरेड

नागपुर

19.20

1.86

2.24

23.30

भाग

कुल :

19.20

1.86

2.24

23.30

भाग - III

ग्राम का नाम

पटवारी

सर्किल

सं्‍ या

तिसील

जिला

क्षेत्रफल िेक् टर में

कुल

रटप् पणी

अजभिषजत

सरकारी

वन

मकरिोकड़ा

उमरेड

नागपुर

5.15

भाग

कुल :

5.15

भाग - IV

ग्राम का नाम

पटवारी

सर्किल

सं्‍ या

तिसील

जिला

क्षेत्रफल िेक् टर में

कुल

रटप् पणी

अजभिषजत

सरकारी

वन

मकरिोकड़ा

उमरेड

नागपुर

2.87

भाग

कुल :

2.87

भाग - V

ग्राम का नाम

पटवारी

सर्किल

सं्‍ या

तिसील

जिला

क्षेत्रफल िेक् टर में

कुल

रटप् पणी

अजभिषजत

सरकारी

वन

मकरिोकड़ा

उमरेड

नागपुर

1.46

भाग

कुल :-

1.46

भाग - VI

ग्राम का नाम

पटवारी

सर्किल

सं्‍ या

तिसील

जिला

क्षेत्रफल िेक् टर में

कुल

रटप् पणी

अजभिषजत

सरकारी

वन

मकरिोकड़ा

उमरेड

नागपुर

0.76

भाग

कुल :-

0.76

3180 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 26, 2020/PAUSHA 5, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

भाग - VII

क्रम

सं.

ग्राम का नाम

पटवारी

सर्किल

सं्‍ या

तिसील

जिला

क्षेत्रफल िेक् टर में

कुल

रटप् पणी

अजभिषजत

सरकारी

वन

मकरिोकड़ा

उमरेड

नागपुर

7.19

8.14

15.33

भाग

बोपेश् वर

उमरेड

नागपुर

3.88

0.14

4.02

भाग

कटारा

उमरेड

नागपुर

6.62

0.90

3.32

10.84

भाग

कुल :

17.69

1.04

11.46

30.19

भाग - VIII

ग्राम का नाम

पटवारी

सर्किल

सं्‍ या

तिसील

जिला

क्षेत्रफल िेक् टर में

कुल

रटप् पणी

अजभिषजत

सरकारी

वन

मकरिोकड़ा

उमरेड

नागपुर

3.36

भाग

कुल :-

3.36

भाग - IX

ग्राम का नाम

पटवारी

सर्किल

सं्‍ या

तिसील

जिला

क्षेत्रफल िेक् टर में

कुल

रटप् पणी

अजभिषजत

सरकारी

वन

बोपेश् वर

उमरेड

नागपुर

2.00

भाग

कुल :-

2.00

भाग - XI

ग्राम का नाम

पटवारी

सर्किल

सं्‍ या

तिसील

जिला

क्षेत्रफल िेक् टर में

कुल

रटप् पणी

अजभिषजत

सरकारी

वन

िेवती

उमरेड

नागपुर

72.41

2.11

74.52

भाग

कुल :-

72.41

2.11

74.52

भाग - XII

ग्राम का नाम

पटवारी

सर्किल

सं्‍ या

तिसील

जिला

क्षेत्रफल िेक् टर में

कुल

रटप् पणी

अजभिषजत

सरकारी

वन

िेवती

उमरेड

नागपुर

16.17

भाग

कुल :-

16.17

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 26, 2020/पौष 5, 1942

3181

भाग - XIII

ग्राम का नाम

पटवारी

सर्किल

सं्‍ या

तिसील

जिला

क्षेत्रफल िेक् टर में

कुल

रटप् पणी

अजभिषजत

सरकारी

वन

सुकली

उमरेड

नागपुर

2.55

भाग

कुल :

2.55

भाग - XIV

ग्राम का नाम

पटवारी

सर्किल

सं्‍ या

तिसील

जिला

क्षेत्रफल िेक् टर में

कुल

रटप् पणी

अजभिषजत

सरकारी

वन

सुकली

उमरेड

नागपुर

12.07

0.68

5.70

18.45

भाग

कुल :

12.07

0.68

5.70

18.45

कुल क्षेत्रफल (भाग – I से भाग – XIV)

अजभिषजत भूजम

- 183.74 िेक् टर

सरकारी भूजम

- 7.02 िेक् टर

वन भूजम

- 39.65 िेक् टर

कुल भूजम : 230.41 िेक् टर (लगभग)

या 569.34 एकड़ (लगभग)

भाग - I

ग्राम ििेगांव में अर्िित दकए िाने वाले प् लाट सं्‍ यांक :

43, 64/1- 64/2- 64/3, 65, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 109/1- 109/2, 112, 113, 184, 192,

सड़क (भाग), नाला (भाग).

वन भूजम :

66, 82 (भाग), 102, 103, 104, 105 (भाग), 108, 110, 111, 186.

भाग - II

ग्राम मकरिोकड़ा में अर्िित दकए िाने वाले प् लाट सं्‍ यांक :

19 (भाग), 24, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, सड़क (भाग).

वन भूजम :

25 (भाग).

भाग - III

ग्राम मकरिोकड़ा में अर्िित दकए िाने वाले प् लाट सं्‍ यांक :

90/2, 91/2, 92/1- 92/2- 92/3.

3182 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 26, 2020/PAUSHA 5, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

भाग - IV

ग्राम मकरिोकड़ा में अर्िित दकए िाने वाले प् लाट सं्‍ यांक :

70, 77, 78.

भाग - V

ग्राम मकरिोकड़ा में अर्िित दकए िाने वाले प् लाट सं्‍ यांक :

71, 72.

भाग - VI

ग्राम मकरिोकड़ा में अर्िित दकए िाने वाले प् लाट सं्‍ यांक :

136/3- 136/4.

भाग - VII

ग्राम मकरिोकड़ा में अर्िित दकए िाने वाले प् लाट सं्‍ यांक :

340/1- 340/2, 341, 344/1- 344/2, 572.

वन भूजम : 343 (भाग(.

ग्राम बोपेश् वर में अर्िित दकए िाने वाले प् लाट सं्‍ यांक :

125, 126, 127, 128, 129, नाला (भाग).

ग्राम कटारा में अर्िित दकए िाने वाले प् लाट सं्‍ यांक :

2/1(भाग)- 2/2(भाग)- 2/3(भाग), 3, 4, 37/1- 37/2- 37/3, 130, सड़क (भाग).

वन भूजम : 39.

भाग - VIII

ग्राम मकरिोकड़ा में अर्िित दकए िाने वाले प् लाट सं्‍ यांक :

338, 339, 342.

भाग - IX

ग्राम बोपेश् वर में अर्िित दकए िाने वाले प् लाट सं्‍ यांक :

32 (भाग).

भाग - XI

ग्राम िेवती में अर्िित दकए िाने वाले प् लाट सं्‍ यांक :

120/1- 120/2- 120/3- 120/4, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125/1- 125/2, 126, 127, 155, 156, 159/1/अ-

159/1/ब-159/2-159/3, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169/1- 169/2- 169/3,

170/1- 170/2- 170/3, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192/1- 192/2- 192/3, 194, 195, 196/1- 196/2, 197,

198, 199, 200, 201, 202/1- 202/2- 202/3, 203/1/अ- 203/1/ब- 203/2/अ-203/2/ब, 204, 205,

217/1- 217/2- 217/3, 218, 219/1- 219/2, नाला (भाग), सड़क (भाग).

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 26, 2020/पौष 5, 1942

3183

भाग - XII

ग्राम िेवती में अर्िित दकए िाने वाले प् लाट सं्‍ यांक :

100/1- 100/2, 101/1- 101/2- 101/3, 107/2/अ- 107/2/ब, 108/1- 108/2, 109/1- 109/2, 110/1-

110/2.

भाग - XIII

ग्राम िेवती में अर्िित दकए िाने वाले प् लाट सं्‍ यांक :

107/1, 108.

भाग - XIV

ग्राम सुकली में अर्िित दकए िाने वाले प् लाट सं्‍ यांक :

70/1- 70/2, 74, 75/1- 75/2, 79, 83, 93, सड़क (भाग).

वन भूजम :

72 (भाग), 73 (भाग).

सीमा वणिन :

भाग – I

क – :

रे ा ग्राम ििेगांव में प् लाट सं्‍ या 192 के उत् तर-पजश् चम छोर पर जस्ट् त जबन् िु ‘क’ से आरंभ िोकर, प् लाट

सं्‍ यांक 192, 64 की बाह्य सीमा से िोकर, दफर सड़क की उत् तरी सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई पूवि दििा

से गुिरती हुई जबन् िु ' ' पर जमलती िज ।

– ग :

रे ा जबन् िु ‘ ’ से आरंभ िोकर पूवि दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ या 74 की बाह्य सीमा से िोती हुई, प् लाट सं्‍ यांक

82,105 में से िोती हुई उत् तर दििा में मुडती िज त ा सड़क पार कर जबन् िु ‘ग’ पर जमलती िज ।

ग – घ :

रे ा जबन् िु ‘ग’ से आरंभ िोकर िजक्षण-पूवि दििा में सड़क से लगकर िोती हुई ग्राम ििेगांव और

मकरिोकड़ा की सम् मजलत ग्राम सीमा पर जस्ट् त ‘घ’ पर जमलती िज ।

घ – ड. : रे ा जबन् िु ‘घ’ से आरंभ िोकर उत् तर-पजश् चम दििा में रेल अजिग्रजित भूजम की उत् तर दििा से लगकर

िोती हुई त ा प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 186, 108, 113, 112, 110, 111, 69, 68, 64, 43 की िजक्षण सीमा

से लगकर गुिरती हुई प् लाट सं्‍ या 43 के पजश् चम कोने पर जबन् िु ‘ड.’ पर जमलती िज।

ड. – क :

रे ा जबन् िु ‘ड.’ से आरंभ िोकर उत् तर दििा में सड़क से लगकर दफर प् लाट सं्‍ या 192 की सीमा से

लगकर गुिरती हुई आरंजभक जबन् िु ‘क’ पर समाप् त िोती िज।

भाग – II

च - छ :

रे ा ग्राम मकरिोकड़ा में प् लाट सं्‍ या 25 के िजक्षण-पजश् चम छोर पर जस्ट् त जबन् िु ‘च’ से आरंभ िोकर

िजक्षण पूवि दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ या 25 की उत् तर सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई जबन् िु ‘छ’ पर जमलती िज ।

छ – ि :

रे ा जबन् िु ‘छ’ से आरंभ िोकर िजक्षण-पूवि दििा में रेल अजिग्रजित भूजम के िजक्षण तट से लगकर गुिरती

हुई प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 24, 19, 51, 53 की उत् तर सीमा से लगकर गुिातर हुई जबन् िु ‘ि’ पर जमलती िज ।

3184 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 26, 2020/PAUSHA 5, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ि - झ :

रे ा जबन् िु ‘ि’ से आरंभ िोकर िजक्षण-पूवि दििा में रेल अजिग्रजित भूजम के िजक्षण तट से लगकर गुिरती

हुई त ा प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर गुिरती हुई जबन् िु ‘झ’

पर जमलती िज

झ - ञ :

रे ा जबन् िु ‘झ’ से आरंभ िोकर िजक्षण-पजश् चम दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 58, 59 की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर

गुिरती हुई सड़क पार करती िज दफर उत् तर-पजश् चम दििा में सड़क से लगकर गुिरती हुई, दफर प् लाट

सं्‍ यांक 19, 24 की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर गुिरती हुई प् लाट सं्‍ या 24 के िजक्षण-पूवि छोर पर जबन् िु

‘ञ’ पर जमलती िज ।

ञ - ट- च : रे ा जबन् िु ‘ञ’ से आरंभ िोकर प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 24, 25 की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर गुिरती हुई प् लाट

सं्‍ या 25 के िजक्षण-पूवि कोने पर जस्ट् त जबन् िु ‘ञ’ से गुिरती हुई आरंजभक जबन् िु ‘च’ पर समाप् त िोती

िज।

भाग - III

– ड

: रे ा ग्राम मकरिोकड़ा में जबन् िु ‘ ’ से आरंभ िोकर पूवि दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 92, 91/2, 90/2 की

उत् तर सीमा से लगकर गुिरती िज और जबन् िु ‘ड’ पर जमलती िज ।

ड – ढ

रे ा जबन् िु ‘ड’ से आरंभ िोती िज और िजक्षण दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ या 90/2 की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर

गुिरती िज और जबन् िु ‘ढ’ पर जमलती िज ।

ढ - ण :

रे ा जबन् िु ‘ढ’ से आरंभ िोती िज और पजश् चम दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 90/2, 91/2, 92 की िजक्षण सीमा

से लगकर गुिरती िज और जबन् िु ‘ण’ पर जमलती िज।

ण - :

रे ा जबन् िु ‘ण’ से आरंभ िोती िज और उत् तर दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ या 92 की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर गुिरती

िज और आरंजभक जबन् िु ‘ ’ पर समाप् त िोती िज।

भाग - IV

त -

रे ा ग्राम मकरिोकड़ा में जबन् िु ‘त’ से आरंभ िोती िज, िजक्षण-पूवि दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 78, 77, 70

की उत् तर सीमा से लगकर गुिरते हुए जबन् िु ‘ ’ पर जमलती िज ।

- ि:

रे ा जबन् िु ‘ ’ से आरंभ िोती िज, िजक्षण दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ या 70 की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर गुिरते हुए

जबन् िु ‘ि’ पर जमलती िज ।

ि - ि:

रे ा जबन् िु ‘ि’ से आरंभ िोती िज, पजश् चम दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 70, 77, 78 की िजक्षण सीमा से

लगकर गुिरती िज, जबन् िु ‘ि’ पर जमलती िज ।

ि - त:

रे ा जबन् िु ‘ि’ से आरंभ िोती िज, उत् तर-पूवि दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ या 78 की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई

आरंजभक जबन् िु ‘त’ पर समाप् त िोती िज ।

भाग - V

न-प-फ-

ब-न :

यि भाग ग्राम मकरिोकड़ा में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 71 और 72 को संलजग् नत करता िज ।

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 26, 2020/पौष 5, 1942

3185

भाग – VI

भ-म-य-

क1-भ : यि भाग ग्राम मकरिोकड़ा में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 136/3 और 136/4 को संलजग् नत करता िज।

भाग – VII

1 – ग1 : रे ा ग्राम मकरिोकड़ा में जबन् िु ‘ 1’ से आरंभ िोती िज, पूवि दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 572, 344 की

उत् तर सीमा से लगकर गुिरती िज और जबन् िु ‘ग1’ पर जमलती िज ।

ग1 – घ1 : रे ा जबन् िु ‘ग1’ से आरंभ िोकर पूवि दििा में रेल अजिग्रजित भूजम के िजक्षण दकनारे से लगकर िोती हुई

प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 343, 341, 340, की उत् तर सीमा से लगकर गुिरती िज, ग्राम बोपेश् वर में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक

128, 127, 126, 125 की उत् तरी सीमा से लगकर िोती िज, दफर ग्राम कटारा में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 2,

130, 3, 4 की उत् तरी सीमा से लगकर गुिरती िज और ग्राम कटारा में जबन् िु ‘घ1’ पर जमलती िज ।

घ1 - ड.1: रे ा जबन् िु ‘घ1’ से आरंभ िोती िज, पजश् चम दििा में सड़क से लगकर गुिरती िज, दफर िजक्षण दििा में

प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 37, 39 की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई ग्राम कटारा में जबन् िु ‘ड.1’ पर जमलती िज ।

ड.1 –च1: रे ा जबन् िु ‘ड.1’ से आरंभ िोकर पजश् चम दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ या 39 की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई

जबन् िु ‘च1’ पर जमलती िज ।

च1 – छ1 : रे ा जबन् िु ‘च1’ से आरंभ िोकर उत् तर दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 39, 37, 3 की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर

िोती हुई जबन् िु ‘छ1’ पर जमलती िज ।

छ1 – ि1: रे ा जबन् िु ‘छ1’ से आरंभ िोकर पजश् चम दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 3, 2 की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर िोती

हुई दफर ग्राम बोपेश् वर की ग्राम सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई दफर ग्राम मकरिोकड़ा की सीमा से लगकर

िोती हुई ग्राम मकरिोकरा में प् लाट सं्‍ या 341 के िजक्षण-पजश् चम कोने पर जबन् िु ‘ि1’ पर जमलती िज ।

ि1 – झ1 : रे ा जबन् िु ‘ि1’ से आरंभ िोकर पजश् चम दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ या 343 की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई

जबन् िु ‘झ1’ पर जमलती िज ।

झ1 – ञ1: रे ा जबन् िु ‘झ1’ से आरंभ िोकर पजश् चम दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 343, 344 की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर

िोती हुई ग्राम मकरिोकड़ा में जबन् िु ‘ञ1’ पर जमलती िज ।

ञ1 – 1 : रे ा जबन् िु ‘ञ1’ से आरंभ िोकर उत् तर दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 344, 572 की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर

िोती हुई ग्राम मकरिोकड़ा में आरंजभक जबन् िु ‘ 1’ पर समाप् त िोती िज।

भाग – VIII

ट1 - 1 : रे ा ग्राम मकरिोकड़ा में जबन् िु ‘ट1’ से आरंभ िोकर उत् तर दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ या 342 की पजश् चम सीमा

से लगकर िोती हुई जबन् िु ‘ 1’ पर जमलती िज ।

1– ड1 : रे ा जबन् िु ‘ 1’ से आरंभ िोकर पूवि दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 342, 338, 339 की उत् तरी सीमा से

लगकर िोती हुई ग्राम मकरिोकड़ा और ग्राम बोपेश् वर की सजम् मजलत ग्राम सीमा पर जस्ट् त जबन् िु ‘ड1’

पर जमलती िज।

3186 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 26, 2020/PAUSHA 5, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ड1 – ढ1: रे ा जबन् िु ‘ड1’ से आरंभ िोकर िजक्षण-पजश् चम दििा में ग्राम मकरिोकड़ा और ग्राम बोपेश् वर की

सजम् मजलत ग्राम सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई प् लाट सं्‍ या 339 के िजक्षण-पूवि छोर पर जबन् िु ‘ढ1’ पर

जमलती िज ।

ढ1 - ट1 : रे ा जबन् िु ‘ढ़1’ से आरंभ िोकर पजश् चम दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 339, 338, 342 की िजक्षण सीमा से

लगकर िोती हुई आरजभक जबन् िु ‘ट1’ पर समाप् त िोती िज ।

भाग - IX

ण1 – त1 – 1

- ि1 – ण1: यि भाग ग्राम बोपश् वर में प् लाट सं्‍ या 32 को संलजग् नत करता िज ।

भाग - XI

ि1 – न1 : रे ा ग्राम िेवती में प् लाट सं्‍ या 127 के पजश् चम कोने पर जस्ट् त जबन् िु ‘ि1’ से आरंभ िोकर उत् तर-पूवि

दििा में निर के िजक्षण तट से लगकर िोती हुई प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 155 और 156 के उत् तर-पजश् चम कोने पर

जबन् िु ‘न1’ पर जमलती िज ।

न1 – प1 : रे ा जबन् िु ‘न1’ से आरंभ िोकर पूवि दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 156, 159 की उत् तरी सीमा से लगकर दफर

ग्राम िेवती की ग्राम सीमा से िोती हुई प् लाट सं्‍ या 205 के उत् तर-पूवि कोने पर त ा िेवती ग्राम सीमा

पर जस्ट् त जबन् िु ‘प1’ पर जमलती िज ।

प1-फ1:

रे ा जबन् िु ‘प1’ से आरंभ िोकर िजक्षण दििा में ग्राम िेवती में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 205, 217, 219 की पूवि

सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई जबन् िु ‘फ1’ पर जमलती िज ।

फ1-ब1: रे ा जबन् िु ‘फ1’ से आरंभ िोकर पजश् चम दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 219, 196, 195, 194, 192, 190,

189, 170, 120 की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई जबन् िु ‘ब1’ पर जमलती िज ।

ब1 – ि1 : रे ा जबन् िु ‘ब1’ से आरंभ िोकर उत् तर-पजश् चम दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 120, 125, 126, 127 की बाह्य

सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई आरंजभक जबन् िु ‘ि1’ पर समाप् त िोती िज ।

भाग – XII

भ1-म1:

रे ा ग्राम िेवती में जबन् िु ‘भ1’ से आरंभ िोकर उत् तर दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 101/1- 101/2- 101/3

की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई दफर पूवि दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 100, 108 की बाह्य सीमा से

लगकर िोती हुई निर के तट पर जस्ट् त जबन् िु ‘म1’ पर जमलती िज ।

म1-य1:

रे ा जबन् िु ‘म1’ से आरंभ िोकर िजक्षण-पूवि दििा में निर के िजक्षण दकनारे से लगकर िोती हुई प् लाट

सं्‍ या 110 के िजक्षण-पूवि कोने पर जबन् िु ‘य1’ पर जमलती िज ।

य1- क2: रे ा जबन् िु ‘य1’ से आरंभ िोकर पजश् चम दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ या 110 की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई

जबन् िु ‘क2’ पर जमलती िज ।

क2 – भ1 : रे ा जबन् िु ‘क1’ से आरंभ िोकर पजश् चम दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 108, 107/2अ, 101/1 की बाह्य सीमा

से लगकर िोती हुई ग्राम िेवती में आरंजभक जबन् िु ‘भ1’ पर समाप् त िोती िज ।

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 26, 2020/पौष 5, 1942

3187

भाग - XIII

2–ग2–घ2-

ड.2- 2: यि भाग ग्राम सुकली में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 107/1 और 108 को संलजग् नत करता िज ।

भाग – XIV

च2 – छ2: रे ा जबन् िु ‘च2’ से आरंभ िोकर पूवि दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 70/1, 79 की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर िोती

हुई दफर प् लाट सं्‍ या 72 मे से िोती हुई सड़क पार करती िज दफर पूवि दििा में प् लाट सं्‍ यांक 75, 74,

83 की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई जबन् िु ‘छ2’ पर जमलती िज ।

छ2 – ि2: रे ा जबन् िु ‘छ2’ से आरंभ िोकर िजक्षण दििा से िोती हुई सड़क पार कर प् लाट सं्‍ या 93 की बाह्य

सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई जबन् िु ‘ि2’ पर जमलती िज ।

ि2 – झ2: रे ा जबन् िु ‘ि2’ से आरंभ िोकर पजश् चम दििा में दिनेि जववषत िान के जलए पूवि में अजिग्रजित भूजम की

उत् तरी सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई सड़क के पूवी तट पर त ा प् लाट सं्‍ या 70/2 के िजक्षण कोने पर जस्ट् त

जबन् िु ‘झ2’ पर जमलती िज ।

झ2 – च2 : रे ा जबन् िु ‘झ2’ से आरंभ िोकर उत् तर दििा में दिनेि जववषत िान के जलए पूवि में अजिग्रजित भूजम की

सीमा से लगकर िोती हुई दफर सड़क के पूवी तट से लगकर िोती हुई ग्राम सुकली में प् लाट सं्‍ या 70/1

के उत् तर-पजश् चम छोर पर आरंजभक जबन् िु ‘च2’ पर समाप् त िोती िज ।

[फा. सं. 43015/11/2020-एलए एण्ड आईआर]

राम जिरोमजण सरोि , उप सजचव

New Delhi, the 23rd December, 2020

S. O. 1093.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number

S. O. 530, dated the 16th July, 2020, issued under sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas

(Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and published in

the Gazette of India, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), dated the 18th July, 2020, the Central Government gave

notice of its intention to prospect for coal in 297.61 hectares (approximately) or 735.39 acres (approximately) of

the land in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification ;

And whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable in a part of the said lands

prescribed in the Schedule appended hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 7 of the said Act, the

Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire all rights in or over the land measuring

230.41 hectares (approximately) or 569.34 acres (approximately) described in the aforesaid Schedule ;

Note 1: The plan bearing number C-I(E)III/FUR/1020/963, dated the 10th October, 2020 of the area covered by

this notification may be inspected in the office of the Collector, District Nagpur (Maharashtra) or in the office of

the Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata - 700 001 or in the office of the Chief Manager or Head of

Department, Revenue Department, Western Coalfields Limited, Coal Estate, Civil Lines, Nagpur – 440 001

(Maharashtra);

Note 2: Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of section 8 of the said Act which provides as follows:-

“8. Objections to acquisition.- (1) Any person interested in any land in respect of which a notification

under section 7 has been issued, may, within thirty days of the issue of the notification, object to the acquisition

of the whole or any part of the land or of any rights in or over such land.

Explanation:- It shall not be an objection within the meaning of this section for any person to say that he

himself desires to undertake mining operations in the land for the production of coal and that such operations

should not be undertaken by the Central Government or by any other person.

3188 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 26, 2020/PAUSHA 5, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(2)

Every objection under sub-section (1) shall be made to the competent authority in writing and the

competent authority shall give the objector an opportunity of being heard either in person or by a legal

practitioner and shall, after hearing all such objections and after making such further inquiry, if any, as he thinks

necessary, either make a report in respect of the land which has been notified under sub-section (1) of section 7

or of rights in or over such land, or make different reports in respect of different parcels of such land or of rights

in or over such land, to the Central Government, containing his recommendations on the objections, together

with the record of proceedings held by him, for the decision of that Government.

(3)

For the purpose of this section, a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitled

to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under this Act.”

Note 3: The Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata - 700 001 has been appointed by the Central

Government as the competent authority under section 3 of the said Act, vide number S.O. 2519, dated the 27th

May, 1983, published in Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) of the Gazette of India, dated the 11th June, 1983.

SCHEDULE

Dinesh (Makardhokra - III) Expansion Opencast Mine

Umrer Area

District Nagpur, Maharashtra

(Plan Number C-I(E)III/FUR/1020/963, dated the 10th October, 2020)

All Rights:

Part-I

Name of

Village

Patwari

Circle

number

Tahsil

District

Area in hectares

Total

Remarks

Tenancy

Govern-ment

Forest

Dahegoan

Umred

Nagpur

28.05

1.33

20.25

49.63

Part

Total:

28.05

1.33

20.25

49.63

Part-II

Name of Village

Patwari

Circle

number

Tahsil

District

Area in hectares

Total

Remarks

Tenancy

Govern-ment

Forest

Makardhokra

Umred

Nagpur

19.20

1.86

2.24

23.30

Total:

19.20

1.86

2.24

23.30

Part-III

Name of Village

Patwari

Circle

number

Tahsil

District

Area in hectares

Total

Remarks

Tenancy

Govern-

ment

Forest

Makardhokra

Umred

Nagpur

5.15

Part

Total:

5.15

Part-IV

Name of Village

Patwari

Circle

number

Tahsil

District

Area in hectares

Total

Remarks

Tenancy

Govern-ment

Forest

Makardhokra

Umred

Nagpur

2.87

Part

Total:

2.87

Part-V

Name of Village

Patwari

Circle

number

Tahsil

District

Area in hectares

Total

Remarks

Tenancy

Govern-ment

Forest

Makardhokra

Umred

Nagpur

1.46

Part

Total:

1.46

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 26, 2020/पौष 5, 1942

3189

Part-VI

Name of Village

Patwari

Circle

number

Tahsil

District

Area in hectares

Total

Remarks

Tenancy Govern-ment Forest

Makardhokra

Umred

Nagpur

0.76

Part

Total:

0.76

Part-VII

Sr.

No.

Name of

Village

Patwari

Circle

number

Tahsil

District

Area in hectares

Total

Remarks

Tenancy Govern-

ment

Forest

Makardhokra

Umred

Nagpur

7.19

0.00

8.14

15.33

Part

Bopeshwar

Umred

Nagpur

3.88

0.14

4.02

Katara

Umred

Nagpur

6.62

0.90

3.32

10.84

Total:

17.69

1.04

11.46

30.19

Part-VIII

Name of Village

Patwari

Circle

number

Tahsil

District

Area in hectares

Total

Remarks

Tenancy Government Forest

Makardhokra

Umred

Nagpur

3.36

Part

Total:

3.36

Part-IX

Name of Village

Patwari

Circle

number

Tahsil

District

Area in hectares

Total

Remarks

Tenancy Govern-ment Forest

Bopeshwar

Umred

Nagpur

2.00

Part

Total:

2.00

Part-XI

Name of

Village

Patwari

Circle

number

Tahsil

District

Area in hectares

Total

Remarks

Tenancy Govern-ment Forest

Hewati

Umred

Nagpur

72.41

2.11

74.52

Part

Total:

72.41

2.11

74.52

Part-XII

Name of

Village

Patwari

Circle

number

Tahsil

District

Area in hectares

Total

Remarks

Tenancy Govern-ment Forest

Hewati

Umred

Nagpur

16.17

Part

Total:

16.17

Part-XIII

Name of

Village

Patwari

Circle

number

Tahsil

District

Area in hectares

Total

Remarks

Tenancy Govern-ment Forest

Sukli

Umred

Nagpur

2.55

Part

Total:

2.55

Part-XIV

Name of

Village

Patwari

Circle

Number

Tahsil

District

Area in hectares

Total

Remarks

Tenancy

Government

Forest

Sukli

Umred

Nagpur

12.07

0.68

5.70

18.45

Part

Total:

12.07

0.68

5.70

18.45

3190 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 26, 2020/PAUSHA 5, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Total Area (Part–I to Part – XIV) :

Tenancy land

- 183.74 hectares

Government land - 7.02 hectares

Forest land

- 39.65 hectares

Total land : 230.41 hectares (approximately)

or 569.34 acres (approximately)

Part-I

Plot numbers to be acquired in village Dahegaon:

43, 64/1- 64/2- 64/3, 65, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 109/1- 109/2, 112, 113, 184, 192, Road (Part), Nallah

(Part).

Forest land :

66, 82 (Part), 102, 103, 104, 105 (Part), 108, 110, 111, 186.

Part-II

Plot numbers to be acquired in village Makardhokra:

19 (Part), 24, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, Road (Part).

Forest land :

25 (Part).

Part-III

Plot numbers to be acquired in village Makardhokra:

90/2, 91/2, 92/1- 92/2- 92/3.

Part-IV

Plot numbers to be acquired in village Makardhokra:

70, 77, 78.

Part-V

Plot numbers to be acquired in village Makardhokra:

71, 72.

Part-VI

Plot numbers to be acquired in village Makardhokra:

136/3- 136/4.

Part-VII

Plot numbers to be acquired in village Makardhokra:

340/1- 340/2, 341, 344/1- 344/2, 572.

Forest land :

343(Part).

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 26, 2020/पौष 5, 1942

3191

Plot numbers to be acquired in village Bopeshwar:

125, 126, 127, 128, 129, Nallah (Part).

Plot numbers to be acquired in village Katara:

2/1(Part)- 2/2(Part)- 2/3(Part), 3, 4, 37/1- 37/2- 37/3, 130, Road (Part).

Forest land :

39.

Part-VIII

Plot numbers to be acquired in village Makardhokra:

338, 339, 342.

Part-IX

Plot numbers to be acquired in village Bopeshwar:

32 (Part).

Part-XI

Plot numbers to be acquired in village Hewati:

120/1- 120/2- 120/3- 120/4, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125/1- 125/2, 126, 127, 155, 156, 159/1/A- 159/1/B- 159/2-

159/3, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169/1- 169/2- 169/3, 170/1- 170/2- 170/3, 188, 189, 190,

191, 192/1- 192/2- 192/3, 194, 195, 196/1- 196/2, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202/1- 202/2- 202/3, 203/1/A-

203/1/B- 203/2/A- 203/2/B, 204, 205, 217/1- 217/2- 217/3, 218, 219/1- 219/2, Nallah (Part), Road (Part).

Part-XII

Plot numbers to be acquired in village Hewati:

100/1- 100/2, 101/1- 101/2- 101/3, 107/2/A- 107/2/B, 108/1- 108/2, 109/1- 109/2, 110/1- 110/2.

Part-XIII

Plot numbers to be acquired in village Hewati:

107/1, 108.

Part-XIV

Plot numbers to be acquired in village Sukli:

70/1- 70/2, 74, 75/1- 75/2, 79, 83, 93, Road (Part).

Forest land :

72 (Part), 73 (Part).

Boundary description:

Part - I

A – B :

Line starts from point ‘A’ on north west corner of plot number 192 in village Dahegaon, passes

along the outer boundary of plot number 192, 64, passes in east direction along the north side of the

road and meets at point ‘B’ on the road.

3192 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 26, 2020/PAUSHA 5, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

B – C :

Line starts from Point ‘B’, passes in east direction along the outer boundary of plot number 74,

passes through plot number 82, 105, then turns in north direction, crosses the road, and meets at

point ‘C’ across the road.

C – D :

Line starts from Point ‘C’, passes in south-east direction along the road and meets at point ‘D’ on

common boundary of villages Dahegaon and Makardhokra.

D – E :

Line starts from point ‘D’ passes in north-west direction along the north side of railway acquired

land and passes along the south boundary of plot numbers 186, 108, 113, 112, 110, 111, 69, 68, 64,

43 and meets at point ‘E’ on west corner of plot number 43.

E – A :

Line starts from point ‘E’ passes in north direction along the road, then passes along the outer

boundary of plot number 192 and meets at starting point ‘A’.

Part – II

F – G :

Line starts from point ‘F’ on north west corner of plot number 25 in village Makardhokra, passes in

south east direction along the north boundary of plot number 25 and meets at point ‘G’.

G – H :

Line starts from point ‘G’ passes in south-east direction along the south side of railway acquired

land and along the north boundary of plot numbers 24, 19, 51, 53 and meets at point ‘H’.

H – I :

Line starts from point ‘H’ passes in south-east direction along the south side of railway acquired

land and along the boundary of plot numbers 53, 55,56,57,58,59 and meets at point ‘I’ at east corner

of plot number 59 in village Makardhokra.

I – J :

Line starts from point ‘K’ passes in south–west direction along outer boundary of plot numbers 58,

59 then crosses the road, then passes in north-west direction along the road, then passes along the

outer boundary of plot numbers 19, 24 and meets at point ‘L’ on south-east corner of plot number

24.

J – K-F :

Line starts from point ‘J’ passes along the outer boundary of plot numbers 24, 25 passes through

point ‘F’ on south west corner of plot no. 25 and ends at starting point ‘F’.

Part - III

L – M :

Line starts from point ‘L’ in village Makardhokra, passes in east direction along the north boundary

of plot numbers 92, 91/2- 90/2 and meets at point ‘M’.

M – N :

Line starts from point ‘M’ passes in south direction along the outer boundary of plot number 90/2

and meets at point ‘N’.

N – O :

Line starts from point ‘N’ passes in west direction along the south boundary of plot numbers 90/2,

91/2, 92 and meet at point ‘O’

O – L :

Line starts from point ‘O’ passes in north direction along the outer boundary of plot number 92 and

ends at starting Point ‘L’

Part - IV

P – Q :

Line starts from point ‘P’ in village Makardhokra, passes in south-east direction along north

boundary of plot numbers 78, 77, 70 meet at point ‘Q’.

Q – R :

Line starts from point ‘Q’ passes in south direction along outer boundary of plot number 70 meet at

point ‘R’.

R – S :

Line starts from point ‘R’ passes in west direction along the south boundary of plot numbers 70, 77,

78 and meet at point ‘S’.

S – P :

Line starts from point ‘S’ passes in north-east direction along the outer boundary of plot number 78

and ends at starting point ‘P’.

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 26, 2020/पौष 5, 1942

3193

Part - V

T-U-V-W-T : This part encompasses the plot numbers 71 and 72 in village Makardhokra.

Part - VI

X - Y- Z-

A1-X :

This part encompasses the plot numbers 136/3 and 136/4 in village Makardhokra.

Part - VII

B1-C1 :

Line starts from point ‘B1’ in village Makardhokra, passes in east direction along the north

boundary of plot numbers 572, 344 and meets at point ‘C1’.

C1-D1 :

Line starts from point ‘C1’, passes in east direction along the south side of railway acquired land

and along the north boundary of plot numbers 343, 341, 340, passes through village Bopeshwar

along the north boundary of plot numbers 128, 127, 126 & 125, then passes in village Katara along

the north boundary of plot numbers 2, 130, 3, 4, crosses the road and meets at point ‘D1’ in village

Katara.

D1-E1:-

Line starts from point ‘D1’ passes in south west direction along the road, then passes in south

direction along the outer boundary of plot numbers 37, 39 of village Katara and meets at point ‘E1’.

E1-F1:-

Line starts from point ‘E1’ passes in west direction along the outer boundary of plot number 39 and

meets at point ‘F1’.

F1-G1:-

Line starts from point ‘F1’ passes in north direction along the outer boundary of plot numbers 39,

37, 3 and meets at point ‘G1’.

G1-H1:-

Line starts from point ‘G1’ passes in west direction along the outer boundary of plot numbers 3, 2,

then passes along the boundary of village Bopeshwar, then passes long the boundary of village

Makardhokra and meets at point ‘H1’ on south-west corner of plot number 341 in village

Makardhokra.

H1-I1:-

Line starts from point ‘H1’ passes along the outer boundary of plot number 343 and meets at point

‘I1’.

I1-J1:-

Line starts from point ‘I1’ passes in west direction along the outer boundary of plot numbers 343,

344 of village Makardhokra and meets at point ‘J1’.

J1-B1:-

Line starts from point ‘J1’ passes in north direction along the outer boundary of plot numbers 344,

572 and ends at starting point ‘B1’ in village Makardhokra.

Part-VIII

K1-L1:-

Line starts from point ‘K1’ in village Makardhokra, passes in north direction along the west

boundary of plot number 342 and meets at point ‘L1’.

L1-M1:-

Line starts from point ‘L1’ passes in east direction along the north boundary of plot numbers 342,

338, 339 and meets at point ‘M1’ on common village boundary of villages Makardhokra and

Bopeshwar.

M1-N1:-

Line starts from point ‘M1’, passes in south-west direction along the common village boundary of

villages Makardhokra and Bopeshwar and meets at point ‘N1’ on south-east corner of plot number

339.

N1-K1:-

Line starts from point ‘N1’ passes in west direction along the south boundary of plot numbers 339,

338, 342 and ends at point ‘K1’.

Part-IX

O1-P1-Q1-R1-O1:- This part encompasses the single plot number 32 in village Bopeshwar.

3194 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 26, 2020/PAUSHA 5, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Part-XI

S1-T1:-

Line starts from point ‘S1’ on west corner of plot number 127 in village Hewati, passes in north-

east direction along the south boundary of canal and meets at point ‘T1’ on north-west corner of

plot number 156.

T1-U1:-

Line starts from point ‘T1’ passes in east direction along the north boundary of plot numbers 156,

159, then passes along the village boundary of Hewati and meets at point ‘U1’ on north-east corner

of plot number 205 on boundary of village Hewati.

U1-V1:-

Line starts from point ‘U1’ passes in south direction in village Hewati along the east boundary of

plot numbers 205, 217, 219 and meets at point ‘V1’.

V1-W1:-

Line starts from point V1’ passes in west direction along the outer boundary of plot numbers 219,

196, 195, 194, 192, 190, 189, 170, 120 and meets at point ‘W1’.

W1-S1:-

Line starts from point ‘W1’ passes in north-west direction along the outer boundary of plot numbers

120, 125, 126, 127 and ends at starting point ‘S1’ in village Hewati.

Part-XII

X1-Y1:-

Line starts from point ‘X1’ in village Hewati, passes in north direction along the outer boundary of

plot numbers 101/1- 101/2- 101/3, then passes in east direction along the outer boundary of plot

numbers 100, 108 and meets at point ‘Y1’ at the bank of the canal.

Y1-Z1:-

Line starts from point ‘Y1’ passes in south-east direction along south bank of canal and meets at

point ‘Z1’ on south-east corner of plot number 110.

Z1-A2:-

Line starts from point ‘Z1’ passes in west direction along the outer boundary of plot number 110

meets at point ‘A2’.

A2-X1:-

Line starts from point ‘A2’ passes in north direction and then in west direction along the outer

boundary of plot numbers 108, 107/2A, 101/1 and ends at starting point ‘X1’ in village Hewati.

Part-XIII

B2-C2-D2-E2-B2:- This part encompasses plot numbers 107/1 and 108 in village Sukli.

Part-XIV

F2-G2:

Line starts from point ‘F2’ passes in east direction along the outer boundary of plot numbers 70/1,

79, passes though plot number 72, crosses road, continues in east direction along the outer boundary

of plot numbers 75, 74, 83 and meets at point ‘G2’.

G2-H2:-

Line starts from point ‘G2’ passes in south direction crossing the road, passes along the outer

boundary of plot number 93 and meets at point ‘H2’.

H2-I2:-

Line starts from point ‘H2’ passes in west direction along the north boundary of land already

acquired for Dinesh Opencast Mine and meets at point ‘I2’ on south west corner of plot number

70/2.

I2-F2:-

Line starts from point ‘I2’ passes in north direction along the land already acquired for Dinesh

Opencast Mine, then continues in north along the east side of the road and ends at starting point ‘F2’

on north-west corner of plot number 70/1 in village Sukali.

[F. No. 43015/11/2020-LA&IR]

RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Dy. Secy.

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 26, 2020/पौष 5, 1942

3195

आयुष मंत्रालय

नई दिल् ली, 16 दिसम्बर, 2020

का.आ. 1094.—केंरीय सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976

(य ा संिोजित 1987) के जनयम (10) के उप-जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, आयुष मंत्रालय के प्रिासजनक जनयंत्रणािीन

जनम्नजलज त कायािलयों, जिनके 80 प्रजतित से अजिक अजिकाररयों/कमिचाररयों ने सिंिी का कायिसािक ज्ञान प्राप्त

कर जलया िज, को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजचत करती िजः-

“िकीम अिमल ााँ साजिजत्यक एवं ऐजतिाजसक यूनानी जचदकत्सा अनुसंिान संस्ट् ान, नई दिल्ली”

“क्षेत्रीय यूनानी जचदकत्सा अनुसंिान संस्ट् ान, नई दिल्ली”

“नजिाजनक अनुसंिान इकाई (यूनानी), कनूिल, आन्र प्रिेि”

[फा. सं. ई-11018/1/2018-आयुष (रा.भा.)]

रोिन िग्गी, संयुक्त सजचव

MINISTRY OF AYUSH

New Delhi, the 16^th December, 2020

S.O. 1094.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the official language (Use for official

purposes of the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies the

following offices under the administrative control of the Ministry of AYUSH, wherein more than 80 %

officers/employees have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:

“Hakim Ajmal Khan Institute for Literary and Historical Research in Unani Medicine, New Delhi”

“Regional Research Institute of Unani Medicine, New Delhi”

“Clinical Research Unit (Unani), Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh”

[F. No. E-11018/1/2018-AYUSH (O.L.)]

ROSHAN JAGGI, Jt. Secy.

श्रम और रोिगार मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 16 दिसम् बर, 2020

का.आ

.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdkas vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k Hkqous'oj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 46@2017½dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 16-12-2020 izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-12012@15@2017-vkbZ vkj ¼ch-1½]

Mh- xqgk] voj lfpo

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 16th December, 2020

S.O. 1095.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 46/2017) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State

Bank of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 16.12.2020.

[No. L-12012/15/2017-IR(B-1)]

D. GUHA, Under Secy.

3196 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 26, 2020/PAUSHA 5, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

BHUBANESWAR

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 46 OF 2017

Dated Bhubaneswar, the 17^th March, 2020.

Present: Shri B.C. Rath, Presiding Officer,

CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar

Between:

The Chief Manager,

State Bank of India, Kandasar Branch,

At: Kandasar, PO. Nalconagar,

Dist. Angul (Odisha) – 759145.

…First party management

AND

Sri Raghunath Behera

At. Soubhagya Nagar, Angul

(Near Maa Muni Durga Jewellery),

Po/Dist. Angul Odisha – 759122.

…Second party workman

Appearances:

Sri B. K. Mishra : For first party management

Sri R. N. Behera : Second party workman himself

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour have referred the industrial dispute for

adjudication vide its Order No. L-12012/15/2017 -(IR(B-I)) dated 04.07.2017 in exercise of powers conferred

by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) (herein after referred to as ‘the Act’) and the terms of reference reads as follows:

“Whether the action of the management of SBI, Kandasar Branch, Dist. Angul, Odisha in removing

Sh. Raghunath Behera from service w.e.f. 19.09.2012 is legal & justified ? If not, to what relief the

workman is entitled to ?”

The case of the second party workman as emerging from his statement of claim is that in the year 2007

when he was in search of a job, the Branch Manager of the management Bank offered him to work as a

Messenger in the management Branch Bank. Thus he joined in the said Branch to work as Messenger on daily

wage basis by the oral order of the then Branch Manager. He was receiving wages for such engagement on

monthly basis by cheque or payment to his Saving Account through voucher. He continued in the job till

19^th July, 2012 when the Branch Manager informed him not to attend duty from 20^th onwards and paid Rs.

2,700/- to him towards his salary for his engagement till 19^th July, 2012. According to him, when he put forth a

grievance to the other authorities of the management Bank he was recalled to duty on 12.9.2012. He was offered

a cheque of Rs.1300/- and a cheque of Rs.1400/- on two different occasions for his engagement. On 19.9.2012

he was again refused employment. Hence, he preferred a writ before the Hon’ble High Court of Odisha and

thereafter he raised a dispute before the labour machinery. It is his claim that he was in the job of Messenger

from 2007 to September, 2012 and he was disengaged from such job of Messenger without compliance of the

requirements of the Act. Hence, his retrenchment/termination of service was illegal for which he is entitled to be

reinstated in service with back wages.

On being noticed the management Bank has contested the claim taking a stand that the disputant

workman was not appointed in any point of time to work as a Messenger. His engagement was not continuous

and uninterrupted as claimed by the disputant workman. It is the contention of the management that the

disputant workman was given to do certain work i.e. contract job like cleaning the premises of the Branch

Office and shifting of records etc. when such exigencies arose or labour was needed. As such, his engagement

was purely intermittent and temporary in nature as well as need basis. The management Bank has its own

recruitment rules and procedures for appointment of Messenger. No appointment letter was ever issued to the

disputant workman. He received wages or remuneration from the Bank for his contract job. Therefore, the scope

of continuance of his service for a period of 240 days in a calendar year preceding to his alleged retrenchment

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 26, 2020/पौष 5, 1942

3197

did not arise. When there was no appointment or continuous engagement of the disputant workman to work as

Messenger, there was no scope of removal or retrenchment of the disputant workman from the service of

Messenger. Hence, prayer has been made by the management Bank for rejection of the statement of claim.

On the aforesaid pleadings of the parties the following issues are settled.

ISSUES

(i)

Whether the reference is maintainable under the Industrial Disputes Act ?

(ii)

Whether the action of SBI Kandasar Branch, Dist. Angul, Odisha in removing Sri Raghunath

Behera from service with effect from 19.9.2012 is legal and justified ?

(iii) If not, to what relief the workman entitled to ?

The second party workman has examined himself as W.W.1 and filed the documents like copies of

cheque of Rs.1300/-, cheque of Rs.1400/-, order dated 21.2.2014 of the Hon’ble High Court of Odisha,

application dated 26.2.2014 of the complainant, letter of the Bank, Kandasar Branch, letter dated 11.10.2011 of

the Chief Manager of SBI, Kandasar Branch, working certificate dated 1.6.2012 issued by Dy. Manager, SBI of

Kandasar Branch and series of vouchers for working in different months marked as Ext.1 to Ext.8 in support of

his claim whereas, the management Bank has examined its Chief Manager, Kandsar Branch as M.W.1 to refute

the claim of the disputant workman.

FINDINGS

All the issues are taken into consideration for the sake of convenience.

Law is well settled that when ever a claim has been advanced by a workman/employee that he was

dismissed/removed/retrenchment/disengagement or refusal of employment in violation of provision as

enumerated in Section 25-F of the Act, burden lies on him to adduce cogent and credible evidence to establish

that he was appointed or engaged by the management/industry and he worked for more than 240 days in the year

preceding to his termination. Coming to the case at hand, it is the case of the claimant that he had worked as

Messenger in the management Bank in between 2007 to September, 2012. But, this plea is denied by the

management. Hence, a duty is cast upon the disputant workman to lead credible evidence to show that he had

infact worked for 240 days in the year preceding to his termination. Filing of an affidavit by the workman in

regard to employment/engagement is only own statement in his favour and the same cannot be regarded as

sufficient evidence for any Court or Tribunal to come to the conclusion that the workman, infact, worked for

240 days in a year. On the other hand, it is elicited from his cross-examination that he did not receive any

interview letter though he claimed to have been appointed after an interview was held by the Branch Manager.

He has admitted that no advertisement was made for the post. He had not submitted any application for his

engagement. Undisputedly the management is a public sector Bank and judicial notice can be taken that it must

have its own recruitment rules and procedures for appointment of its staff. The disputant admits of not

possessing any document to show his appointment or engagement as a Messenger or he attended any interview

in the Bank. Though, he claims to have received the wages for his engagement, not a single scrap of paper

except copies of two Bank’s cheque issued by the management Bank is filed to show that he received wages

from the management Bank for his alleged engagement. Two conduct certificates filed by the disputant

workman are not apparently credit-worthy as where about of the original is not explained or maker of the same

is not examined in the Tribunal to establish the genuineness of the certificates. Thus, the evidence of the

workman is totally wanting to establish or to prove that he was ever appointed or engaged as a Messenger and

he worked as such in between 2007 to 2012. Similarly no credit-worthy evidence is led to establish that the

disputant workman worked for 240 days in a calendar year preceding to the date of his disengagement. Hence, it

can be safely said that the disputant workman has miserably failed to discharge his onus to establish or to prove

that he was employed or engaged in the management Bank to work as a Messenger. When the disputant

workman fails to establish his engagement as a Messenger, he is not entitled to any relief as contemplated under

Section 25-F of the Act. Thus, the statement of claim preferred by him has no merit for consideration and the

same stands rejected.

Accordingly the reference is answered and Award is passed.

Dictated and corrected by me.

B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer

3198 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 26, 2020/PAUSHA 5, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 16 fnlEcj] 2020

का.आ. 1096.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj dukZVdk xzkeh.k cSad izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k caxyksj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 11@2016½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 16-12-2020 izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-12025@01@2020-vkbZ vkj ¼ch-1½]

Mh- xqgk] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 16th December, 2020

S.O. 1096.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 11/2016) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Karnatka

Gramin Bnak and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 16.2.2020.

[No. L-12025/01/2020-IR (B-1)]

D. GUHA, Under Secy.

ANNXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

BANGALORE

DATED : 07^TH DECEMBER, 2020

PRESENT : JUSTICE SMT. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

ID 11/2016

I Party

II Party

Sh. Revanasiddappa,

Revanasiddheswara Nilaya,

H No. 1-892/72/70,

Tamke Layout, Jewargi Road,

Ganesh Nagar,

Gulbarga - 577 001.

The Chairman,

Karnataka Gramin Bank,

Head Office, Gandhinagar,

Bellary - 583 103.

Appearance

Advocate for I Party : Mr. B. M. Madhava

Advocate for II Party : Mr. Z. N. Hansi

AWARD

It is a petition filed by the former employee (1^st Party / workman hereinafter) of the 2^nd Party Erstwhile

Pragathi Grameena Bank presently Karnataka Gramin Bank under Sec 2-A (2&3) of the Industrial Dispute

(Amendment) Act, 2010 (for brevity ‘the Act’) assailing the order of dismissal imposed on him by way of

punishment, since certain charges came to be proved against him in a Departmental Enquiry.

He had joined service with the 2^nd Party as Office Assistant on 18.05.1992 and while working at

Deodurga Branch he was issued charge sheet which was followed by Domestic Enquiry and Report of the

Enquiry Officer holding that the charges are proved; he is dismissed from service by the order of Disciplinary

Authority dated 19.02.2014.

The workman claims that, the copy of the Investigation Reports are not furnished to him, though

summons were issued to the witnesses who are staff members and signatory of some of the documents marked

in the evidence, 2^nd Party managed to stop them from appearing before the Enquiry. Competent Authority has

not given permission to them to depose in the enquiry; as per Sec 33 of the Service Regulations 2010, the staff

members are not allowed to give evidence in the enquiry without the permission of the Competent Authority.

During the enquiry documents were marked through MW-1 and MW-2 though they are not the authors of the

documents. Common enquiry should have been held against all the staff members named in the Enquiry Report.

The Enquiry Officer did not consider the demand made by the Defence for producing 74 documents; instead of

taking action against the Branch Manager / Assistant Manager who were responsible for the transaction, the

allegations is shifted to the shoulders of the 1^st Party who was only a Clerk; he is discriminated and punished to

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 26, 2020/पौष 5, 1942

3199

protect the officers. The Enquiry Report was biased and perverse, the Disciplinary Authority without analysing

the evidences recorded in the enquiry, ignoring the argument and evidence of defence accepted the same.

Norms of natural justice is violated both by Disciplinary Authority and the Appellate Authority by accepting the

biased finding of the Enquiry Officer.

The claim is contested by the 2^nd Party. It is stated in the written statement that,

the 1^st Party joined the services of the erstwhile Tungabhadra Gramin Bank which subsequently amalgamated

into Pragathi Gramin Bank, thereafter Pragathi Gramin Bank was renamed as Pragathi Krishna Gramin Bank on

amalgamation with Krishna Gramin Bank. The Government of India notified the amalgamation of Pragathi

Krishna Gramin Bank (sponsored by Canara Bank) and Kaveri Gramin Bank (sponsored by State Bank of India)

and thus new RRD called Karnataka Gramin Bank came into existence w.e.f 01.04.2019 under the sponsorship

of Canara Bank. The service condition of the 1^st Party is governed by Pragathi Krishna Gramin Bank (Officers

and Employees) Service Regulations, 2013 as on the date of imposing punishment on him.

Further, the allegations against the proceedings of enquiry, Enquiry Report and the orders of the

Disciplinary and Appellate Authority are all denied and punishment order is sought to be justified. It is further

stated that Disciplinary Action is taken against 3 employees – Rahmatulla, Assistant Manager was Compulsorily

Retired, Pradeep Kumar, Assistant Manger was imposed minor punishment and case against Ramakrishnappa,

Assistant Manager became infructuous since he was imposed punishment of Removal from service in another

case.

Vide order dated 25.07.2019 a Preliminary Issue was raised regarding fairness of the Domestic

Enquiry. The Domestic Enquiry records produced by the 2^nd Party were marked with the consent of the 1^st Party

as Ex M-1 to Ex M-12 and the Preliminary Issue was answered in the affirmative holding that the enquiry is

held in a fair and proper manner. However, all the legal contentions regarding insufficiency of evidence,

perversity of enquiry finding are kept open for consideration during final arguments on merits.

Written argument is submitted by 1^st Party and oral argument is addressed by the 2^nd Party.

The allegation against the workman in the charge sheet dated 28.07.2011 was to the effect that-

Credits to the SB Account No. 18683 of Jai Hanuman Vidya Shikshana Samste is posted by him

against norms governing dealing with subsidy and he has dealt with the cheques having material alteration. List

of 16 transactions showing transaction wise lapses, 8 transaction showing the slips posted to SB 11146 /

Banker’s Account, 3 transaction showing the slips posted by the CSE to SB Account of SHGs directly instead of

keeping in Suspense Account and 4 transactions showing the cheques with material alteration posted to SB

Accounts were mentioned in the charge sheet. It was alleged that he has misused official position, connived

with fraudsters, committed and abetted fraud with ulterior motives of making personal gains amounting to

misconduct within the meaning of Regulation Nos. 18 and 20 of Pragathi Gramin Bank (Officers and

Employees) Service Regulations, 2010, punishable under Regulation No. 39 2 (b).

During the enquiry the 1^st Party had the assistance of a co-employee for his defence. 116 documents

were marked for the 2^nd Party and two witnesses were examined for them.

MW-1 is the Investigating Officer and MW-2 was the present Branch Manager.

The Management produced Photostat copies of the documents relied by them, at the request of the

Defence Representative the documents were verified and found that small corrections were made in respect of

few documents after duly informing the defence. The Defence Representative acknowledged verifying the

documents with originals and the corrections submitted for the 2^nd Party.

MW-1 / Investigating Officer stated that there was mis-utilisation of SGSY (Swarna Jayanthi Grama

Swarajya Yojana) Subsidy amount i.e. the amount kept in the SB Account of Taluk Panchayat Deodurga

operated by Accounts Officer and Executive Officer of Taluk Panchayat in SB A/c No. 11146 meant for

administration of subsidy amount under SGSY Scheme and also revolving fund of SHG (Self Help Group)

Account. Taluk Panchayat is issuing cheques (A/c Payee) favouring concerned SHG, if it pertains to Pragathi

Gramin Bank Deodurba Branch or sometimes favouring the Manager of concerned Branch of the 2^nd Party or

other Banks also. During investigation he found that concerned cheques are not passed as per the direction of

the drawer Taluk Panchayat Deodurga: as per the slip bundles in many cases the proceeds of subsidy cheques

were credited to SB AC No. 18683 of Jai Hanuman Vidya Samsthe without any proper authority from the

drawer or without any valid SGSY Subsidy sanction. Thus, the Branch deviated and fraudulently credited

subsidy amount to the 3^rd Party’s account. The total of such amount credited to SB 18683 comes to around Rs.

56.43 lakhs. The Investigation Report submitted by him to the Head Office was marked as ME-1. He had

identified the documents collected during his investigation ME-2 to ME-7.

3200 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 26, 2020/PAUSHA 5, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MW-2 / the present Branch Manager deposed that, he has reported one incident of irregularities in

SGSY subsidy when the officials of Taluk Panchayat Deodurga sought for utilisation certificate wherever

subsidy has been released to various accounts. Through him documents ME-8 to ME-10 were marked. He

identified further 94 + 14 + 3 documents which were already on record.

10.

After the closure of evidence from the Management side, the CSE was examined as a witness, he stated

to the effect that he has not deviated any Circular guidelines, but did act as per the instructions of Higher ups; he

has put up 20 years of service and not dealt with Advance matter, and do not know about SGSY subsidy rules.

There was no mention of SGSY Subsidy in the cheques as alleged in the charge sheet. The transaction

pertaining to BBCA were looked after by Internal Officers; on the basis of the counter foils provided to him, he

had made entries. Sh. R N Ramakrishnappa, Pradeep Kumar and Manager R S Thimmanagoud were taking care

of Banker’s Account and internal work. He has credited BBCA by debiting SB 11146 of Taluk Panchayat

Deodurga as there was balance in the account SB 11146; he has credited as per the instructions of the Officers.

He prepared and posted the slips and directly credited SB 13131, 20169 and 20175 as per the instruction of field

officer and internal officer, he did not know SGSY subsidy guidelines. He posted altered cheques to SB

Accounts and deviated while passing the cheques by bringing to the notice of the higher authorities – his

statements ME-111 and 112 were taken by the Investigation Officer by force and he is not bound by those

statements.

Four independent witnesses were examined for the defence.

DW-2 / Eranna Naik deposed that he has Institutional Account No. 18683 in the name of Jai Hanuman

Vidya Shikshana Samsthe, it is a joint account operated by him and Secretary. His SB Passbook depicts credit

entries of subsidy amounts transferred from Taluk Panchayat Account; the transfers were brought to his

knowledge by the Manager and the Field Officer namely Timmannagoud and Verma. He used to approach

Timmannagoud, Verma and Rahamathulla for these transactions and does not know any other staff. No official

of the Bank or the Taluk Panchayat official had approached him to seek clarifications / explanations in

connection with the bulk credits from the Taluk Panchayat to his SB Account. Though he deposed that amount

so credited to his account is disbursed to the Self Help Groups in the presence of the Manager, during cross

examination he could not memorise any such name of SHGs.

The third defence witness / Devamma was the representative of Marikamba SHG, stated that her group

has been sanctioned subsidy by Taluk Panchayat Member and Field Officer, and it is distributed among 12

members each at Rs. 5,500/- per person. There was no cross examination to this witness.

The fourth witness one Rukmavva: she introduced herself as a member of Anjaneya Self Help Group,

she could not remember the name of the group which she was representing, she deposed that her group has

received subsidy amount of Rs. 25,000/- each for 10 members. There was no cross examination.

The fifth witness was one Chennamma who could not remember the name of SHG which she

represented, however she produced a Bank Passbook, she deposed that she has received Rs. 12,500/- each in

respect of 10 members towards subsidy. There was no cross examination to this witness.

11.

The Enquiry Officer in his Report brushed aside some of the admissions surfacing from the cross

examination evidence of DW-2, on the ground that he is not the person to say whether CSE has passed the

entries shown in the charge sheet or not in the books of Accounts of the Bank. He dwelled mostly upon the

evidence of the Investigating Officer which was to the effect that, along with the Present Branch Manager and

Assistant Manager he visited various villages / Tandas and visited the spot of 14 SHGs; the general observation

during the visit was, SHGs have not maintained any Books of Accounts as required. Some of them gave

statement that they have neither received any SGSY Subsidy nor submitted any application for SGSY subsidy to

the Taluka Panchayat, Deodurga or to the 2^nd Party Branch; they had discontinued savings and Banking

operations, but SGSY subsidy was claimed by 2^nd Party Branch (Form-C was signed by Rahamatulla, Assistant

Manager) and released by Taluka Panchayat Deodurga. Some of the entries made by the CSE related to the

proceeds of local / outstation cheques clearing and said to have been presented by SBH, Deodurga and Jalahalli

Branches. During the investigation the Investigating Officer / MW-1 sought details from the Branch Managers

concerned as to whether those instruments were sent by them; those banks categorically denied that they have

not presented any such instruments to 2^nd Party Branch, and the stamps and signatures put on the instruments do

not pertain to their Branch. As per ME-53 to ME-66 LCC Register Folios, the instruments were lodged, at the

same time they were passed in the Branch itself without actually sending it to the concerned Banks. The

prosecution contended that this was done by the CSE with ulterior motive. DW-3 to DW-5 were examined by

the defence to highlight that subsidy amount are received by the beneficiaries but the Enquiry Authority did not

accept their evidence, as they failed even to name the SHG they were representing.

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 26, 2020/पौष 5, 1942

3201

12.

The CSE had given written statement as per ME-112 before the Investigating Officer on three dates i.e.

20.12.2010, 22.12.2010 and 24.12.2010. In these letters he had pleaded that he is aware of the fact that it is a

subsidy account of Taluk Panchayat; he has carried out his duties as per the instructions of his official superiors,

he had not done anything on his own. The officers from the Taluk Panchayat visited the Branch many times and

they were being attended by the Manager / Field Officer of the Branch. He quoted 6 transactions wherein he

acted as per the letter given by the Taluk Panchayat to transfer the amount to SB Account 18683 of Jai

Hanuman Vidya Shikshana Samsthe; he quoted further 5 transactions wherein there was alteration of the name

of the payee which was authenticated by one of the joint holder of the Account i.e. Account Superintendent, this

was done at the request made by the Taluk Panchayat to pass the cheques and as per the instructions of the

officials. Likewise, his explanation in respect of all the questionable transactions was, it was done at the

instructions of the official superiors / Account holders / Taluk Panchayat.

13.

The Investigating Officer also had recorded the answers given by the CSE to his queries; during the

course he had stated that he has not maintained counter foil pertaining to the credit made to SB 18683 of Jai

Hanuman Vidya Shikshana Samsthe; with regard to passing the cheques with material alterations he had stated

that it is only after the instruction of Taluk Panchayat he passed the cheques. He had retained the cheques of

State Bank of Hyderabad pertaining to the LCC of the said Bank and he surrendered those withheld cheques to

the Investigating Officer. To the specific query that who was that Superior Officer at whose instruction he was

posting the cheques he named his Field Officer Sh. Rahamatulla.

The above statement was not disputed by him during his examination in chief evidence. But during his

cross examination by the Presenting Officer he stated that those statements were taken from him by force.

14.

The Investigating Officer summed the defence put forth by the CSE,

(1)

Banking transactions have to go through certain process (dual control) accordingly slips posted by

Officer has to be verified by the Internal Officer or any other Officer as the case may be.

(2)

SGSY Scheme pertains to advances matters and it is purely under the control of Field Officer of the

Branch

(3)

By mere posting of slips it is not possible to comment any irregularities or deviations (ie, unless

they are verified by Officers).

(4)

No complaint has been received from Taluk Panchayat Deodurga regarding the transactions in

question or material alterations in cheque.

(5)

Bank funds are not involved in this case.

(6)

Bank has not lodged any police complaint against Bank Officials / Taluk Panchayat officials /

concerned SB Account holders.

(7)

No complaint is received from concerned SHG groups regarding non receipt of subsidy.

(8)

Apart from CSE some other staff members in the Branch also committed deviations like him.

15.

The Enquiry Officer observed that all the acts are done to accommodate the transfer of huge sums of

Government to the Account of the unconnected. The defence raised by the CSE was not successful in

persuading the Enquiry Officer. The Enquiry Officer reproduced the Investigation Report highlighting the

wilful complicity of the CSE in the transaction. In the report the Investigating Officer had also given the details,

credits made to his SB Account No. 30769027163 (opened on 10.06.2009) at SBI Deodurga and SB Account

No. 62125589559 (opened on 08.03.2010) with SBH Deodurga. He had opined that the credit entries made in

SB Account of SBI Deodurga that Rs. 7,14,665/- is credited into his account between 10.06.2009 to 21.12.2010;

almost all credit entries co-relates with the dates of debits of SB Account No. 11146 (of Taluk Panchayat,

Deodurga); he has posted 52 cheques of Taluk Panchayat out of 61 cheques to the Account of Jai Hanuman

Vidya Samste, thus committed deviations 63 times. The posting of the slips mentioned in the charge sheet was

proved through the evidence of MW-1 corroborated with the evidence of MW-2 and same was not contradicted

by the CSE.

16.

Before this Tribunal the Enquiry Report is assailed mainly on the ground that, all the management

witnesses are not examined, there is no misconduct on his side by merely posted the slips to the SB Account No.

18683 of Jai Hanuman Hanuman Vidya Shikshana Samste; the Investigation Report refers to various lapses

observed in the Branch and names other officials including Office Assistants and Officers. In the statement

given before the Investigating Officer they had categorically admitted authorising the transactions in respect of

crediting the amount of cheques mentioned in the charge sheet to the SB Account No. 18683 and passing the

3202 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 26, 2020/PAUSHA 5, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

cheques having material alternations at the request of the Taluk Panchayat Staff. Two other clerical staff had

also admitted about passing the altered cheques at the instructions of the superior, it is not only 1^st Party but

other staff also had carried out the work of slip posting. As admitted by MW-2, the previous Manager had

written confidential letter to the Bank highlighting the irregularities committed by Sh. Rahamathulla in

connection to SGSY advance. On the same set of allegation other staff members were also charge sheeted but

are imposed lesser punishments, a joint enquiry ought to have been held as per regulation 42 of the Service

Regulations 2010 which is now violated by the 2^nd Party.

He concludes his defence argument that by overruling the objections raised, by denying the demanded

documents, by allowing the 2^nd Party to produce documents in instalments, by not producing relevant witnesses,

by denying the staff members to appear as witnesses, by accepting the statements of third parties produced

through MW-2 the Enquiry Officer has submitted the Report.

17.

In this regard the 1^st Party has to be reminded that the allegations against him pertain to his

involvement in posting the credits to SB Account 18683 of Jai Hanuman Vidya Shikshana Samste against the

norms governing dealing with subsidy and dealing with cheques having material alterations and also postings

made to the SB Account of SHGs instead of keeping in Suspense Account. He has not disowned postings made

by him as alleged.

18.

During the course of the enquiry he had called for as many as 73 documents in support of his defence.

The Presenting Officer in the proceedings of 26.11.2012 submitted that those documents are not relevant.

Before this Court it is not shown as to how non production of those 73 documents prejudiced the case of the 1^st

Party. It is obvious that at the initial stage no request was made by the defence to conduct a joint enquiry and it

is too late in the end of the day to allege that the matter required a joint enquiry. The production of management

documents in two phases cannot be attributed any irregularity as long as copies of those documents were

provided to the CSE before cross examination of the management witnesses and he had opportunity to adduce

rebuttal evidence. Non-examination of particular witnesses is within the propriety of the Party who has the onus

of establishing the charges. It is not the number of witnesses but the quality of evidence that an Adjudicating

Authority would look for. The Enquiry Authority has not placed reliance on the statements recorded by the

Investigating Officer hence non examination of those witnesses have no impact on the outcome of the enquiry.

Since, the documents produced are all official documents generated during the course of business /

administration of the Branch, they deserve favourable presumption under Sec 114 (e) of the Indian Evidence

Act. Hence, there is no difficulty in upholding the finding to the extent that the postings as detailed in the

charge sheet are made by the 1^st Party. But the difficulty is, with regard to the finding recorded in respect of

misuse of official position, conniving with fraudsters, committing and abetting fraud with ulterior motive for

making personal gains. Unfortunately there is no direct evidence in respect of these allegations. Though the

Investigating Officer in his Report had referred to the Bank Accounts maintained by the CSE at SBI and SBH

those pass books were not marked in his evidence.

19.

The Enquiry Officer has acted upon the opinion of the Investigating Officer recorded in his

Investigating Report pertaining to the CSE, and records that he made personal gains by his alleged acts etc. As

such there was no complaint against the 1^st Party by any quarter. It appears on the basis of the report sent by the

Manager about the irregularities in handling SGSY the investigation commenced. The Investigating

Report finds involvement of other officials of the Branch too. 1^st Party alleges that while the other officials are

let out with minor punishments he only is discriminated by imposing major punishment. Unfortunately 2^nd

Party has not brought any evidence to establish that those officials were also prosecuted and appropriately

punished. The misconduct of postings of the cheques of questionable transactions is not shown to have financial

implication on the 2^nd Party; there is no evidence that subsequent to the investigation made in this case there was

any complaint against the Private Parties, Taluk Panchayat members for misappropriating the public funds. In

the absence of direct evidence pertaining to the unlawful gain made by the 1^st Party by his postings, I hold that

the punishment of dismissal was too harsh on him.

20.

The Disciplinary Authority and Appellate Authority have acted upon the Enquiry Report to impose /

confirm the punishment of dismissal. By the time of his punishment vide order dated 19.02.2014, the 1^st Party

had rendered 20 years of service, there is no reference in the charge sheet or in the punishment order about any

previous misconduct. Considering the nature of the allegations proved during the enquiry, I hold the dismissal

order imposed on him calls for modification by reducing the punishment order to removal from service with all

terminal benefits. That will do justice in the matter.

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 26, 2020/पौष 5, 1942

3203

AWARD

The petition is allowed.

The Dismissal order passed is modified as Removal from service with all the terminal benefits, for

which 1^st Party workman is entitled towards the service rendered to the 2^nd Party.

(Dictated to o/s Steno, transcribed by her, corrected and signed by me on 07^th December, 2020)

Justice Smt. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 fnlEcj] 2020

का.आ. 1097.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj eSa- ukydks fy- ds izca/kra= lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn

esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous'oj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 48@2017½ dks izdkf'kr djrh

gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 16-12-2020 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-43011@3@2017-vkbZ vkj ¼,e½]

uohu oS|] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 16th December, 2020

S.O. 1097.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 48/2017) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s.

NALCO Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 16.12.2020.

[No. L-43011/3/2017-IR(M)]

NAVIN VAIDYA, Dy. Director

ANNXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

BHUBANESWAR

I.D. Case No. 48 of 2017

Dated Bhubaneswar the 10^th July, 2019

Present : Shri B. C. Rath, LL.B, Presiding Officer,

C.G.I.T., Bhubaneswar

Between :

The General Manager (S&P)

NALCO, Angul.

…First party-management

Vrs.

The General Secretary,

Aluminum Mazdoor Sangh

…Second Party-workman

Appearances:

S.S. Panda

: For first party management

B.K. Samal

: Second Party-workman

AWARD

Authorised representatives of the 2^nd Party Union and the 1^st Party Management are present. The 2^nd

Party Union filed a Memo in the official pad of the Union along with a Xerox copy of a circular issued by the

Senior Manager S & P Complex, NALCO Nagar, Angul, Establishment Dept. The authorized representative of

the Union submitted that the 2^nd Party is no more interested to prosecute the reference case in the event of a

settlement arrived at between the parties. It is also submitted by him that the reference case may be disposed

of the dispute being resolved amicably.

Perused the contents of the Memo and the copy of the circular. The 2^nd Party raised the dispute for

with drawal of the revised policy in regard to change of permanent home address introduced by the

3204 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 26, 2020/PAUSHA 5, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Management vide its office order No.CHRD/RR/0003.3/625 dt.3.10.2015 and as the policy was introduced

overlooking the certified standing order of the 1^st Party Management the dispute was raised whether the

policy adopted in the above office order is legal and justified . The policy was in regard to the allotment of

Quarters. Having regard to the Memo filed by the 2^nd Party Union there seems no dispute between the parties

for adjudication. Hence, there is no need to proceed further in the matter of the reference. As there is an

amicable settlement the case be treated as disposed of without any award. The Government of India, Ministry

of Labour be informed accordingly by furnishing a copy of the order.

Dictated & corrected by me.

B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 fnlEcj] 2020

का.आ. 1098.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj eSa- us'kuy ,UVjizkbfll ds izca/kra= lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous'oj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 26@2015½ dks

izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 16-12-2020 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-26011@20@2015-vkbZ vkj ¼,e½]

uohu oS|] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 16th December, 2020

S.O. 1098.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 26/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s.

National Enterprises, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 16.12.2020.

[No. L-26011/20/2015-IR(M)]

NAVIN VAIDYA, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

BHUBANESWAR

I.D. Case No. 26 of 2015

Dated Bhubaneswar the 24^th June, 2019

Present : Shri B. C. Rath, LL.B, Presiding Officer,

C.G.I.T., Bhubaneswar

Between :

The General Manager,

M/s. National Enterprises,

Jajang Iron Ore Mines, AT/PO- Jajang, Via – Joda,

Dist-Keonjhar, Odisha.

… First party-management

Vrs.

The General Secretary,

Shramik Surakshya Sangh,

AT/PO – Champua, Dist: Keonjhar, Odisha.

…Second Party-workman

Appearances:

None

: For first party management

None

: Second Party-workman

AWARD

None appears from either side on calls. On perusal of the record it reveals that neither the 2^nd Party

Union/workman nor the 1^st party management is taking steps for last three adjournments. After filing of the

written statements issues were settled and the case was posted to 25.6.2018 for evidence of the 2^nd party

workman. Three to four adjournments were taken by the 2^nd Party to adduce his evidence and thereafter no step

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 26, 2020/पौष 5, 1942

3205

is being taken for last five adjournments. This reference case cannot be protracted in such a manner for an

indefinite period when the applicant workman does not appears to be interested for adjudication of the dispute

if any. When no material or evidence is produced before the Tribunal, it is not practicable to adjudicate the

dispute under reference.

This I.D. Case is registered in the event of a reference with the schedule “ Whether the age of the

workman as claimed by him to be 15.10.1957 can be said to be true and authentic date of birth. Whether the act

of the management to superannuate the workman on 31.12.2012 as per the entry made in B. Register , as per

the submission made by the management in their letter no.NE/BBL/1593/14-15 dated.02.02.2015 can be held as

fair and justified. If not, what relief the workman is entitled to? Is made by the Central Government of

India,Ministry of Labour by exercising its authority under clause(d) of sub section(1) and sub section(2A) of

Section.10 of I.D. Act,1947(14 of 1947).

It is pertinent to mention here that until adjudication of the dispute referred to by the authority

concerned, there is no provision in the Act to pass a no dispute award or Nil award in case the disputant fails to

make appearance and prosecute his claim. In that circumstance passing of no dispute or Nil award in

absence of the disputant or both the parties would be a misc conception and the above position has been

settled by the Hon’ble High Court of Odisha in the case between M/s.IDL Chemical Ltd. –Vers- Presiding

Officer,Labour Court,Sambalpr reported in 72(1991) CLT 73 and in the decision of the Calcutta High Court in

the case between D.R. Burman and Mohatta India Pvt.Ltd. –Versus- 7^th Industrial West Bengal and others

(Short Note)1977. The Hon’ble High Court have held that so long as the dispute remains unsettled and the

proceeding came to an end without adjudication of the dispute between the parties, there is no bar under the Act

whereby the Government is precluded from referring the dispute over and again so that there may be an

industrial adjudication as contemplated by the Act.

Having regard to the above facts and circumstance as well as settled principles it is just and

appropriate to dismiss the case registered on the reference of the dispute without any award. Accordingly

the reference is disposed of . A copy of the order be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour for

their reference.

Dictated & corrected by me.

B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 fnlEcj] 2020

का.आ.1099.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj Cyw gksd flD;ksfjVh lfoZfll izk- fy- ds izca/kr= lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] Hkqous'oj ds iapkV

¼lanHkZ la- 34@2016½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 16-12-2020 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-29011@4@2016-vkbZ vkj ¼,e½]

uohu oS|] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 16th December, 2020

S.O. 1099.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 34/2016) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Blue

Howk Security Services Pvt. Ltd, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 16.12.2020.

[No. L-29011/4/2016-IR(M)]

NAVIN VAIDYA, Dy. Director

3206 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 26, 2020/PAUSHA 5, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

BHUBANESWAR

I.D. Case No. 34 of 2016

Dated Bhubaneswar the 5^th August, 2019

Present : Shri B. C. Rath, LL.B, Presiding Officer,

C.G.I.T., Bhubaneswar

Between :

The Managing Director, Blue Hawk Security

Services Pvt. Ltd., Berhampur, Ganjam.

The Head OSCOM, IRE, Matikhalo,

Chatrapur, Ganjam.

…First party-management

Vrs.

The President, Orissa Security & Services

Employees Union, Bhubaneswar, Odisha.

…Second Party-workman

Appearances:

P.K. Rout, Manager (Security)

: For first party management

S. K. Reddy

: For Second Party-workman

AWARD

Parties are present through their authorized representative. A memo along with one settlement

between the parties is filed wherein prayer has been made that the case be disposed of in accordance with the

settlement arrived at between the parties. Being asked the 2^nd party union admits of the settlement as per the

terms as mentioned in the settlement. Keeping in view the settlement as their own volition the dispute is

adjudicated as per the terms and conditions of the settlement. Accordingly the reference is answered and the

matter is disposed of.

Dictated & corrected by me.

B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 fnlEcj] 2020

का.आ. 1100.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (a1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj eSa- lhesaV dksjiksjs'ku vkWQ bafM;k ds izca/kra= lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] caxyksj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 03@2019½

izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 16-12-2020 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-29011@13@2018-vkbZ vkj ¼,e½]

uohu oS|] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 16th December, 2020

S.O. 1100.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 03/2019) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Cement

Corporation of India Ltd., and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 16.12.2020.

[No. L-29011/13/2018-IR(M)]

NAVIN VAIDYA, Dy. Director

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 26, 2020/पौष 5, 1942

3207

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIUBNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

BANGALORE

DATED : 2^nd DECEMBER 2020

PRESENT : JUSTICE SMT. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

C R No. 03/2019

I Party

II Party

Sri Gopal RaoGudi,

Sr. Trade Unionist & Union Advisor, H. No.

10-718, ShastriChowk, Brahampur,

KALABURGI – 585 103.

The Chairman cum Managing Director, M/s. Cement

Corporation of India Limited, Core-V, Scope Complex

7 , Lodhi Road, NEW DELHI – 110 003.

The General Manager, M/s Cement Corporation of

India Limited, Cement Factory, Kurkunta, Sedam,

GULBARGA – 585 210.

Appearances:

I Party :

Sh. Muralidhara, Advocate

II Party :

Sh. T Rajaram, Advocate

The Government of India, Ministry of Labourvide order No. L-29011/13/2018-IR(M) dated 13.12.2018

in exercise of the power conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred as “The Act”) (14 of 1947) referred the following Industrial

Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of CCI Workers Union, Kurkunta (AITUC) to claim equal treatment and

implementation of the same rules and principles as followed by Nayagaon Cement Factory,

Mandasoor in Mandhya Pradesh is proper and justified? If yes, what directions are necessary in

the matter?”

On receipt of the reference order, notice was issued to both parties. Sh. MD, Advocate filed power for

the 1^st Party. 2^nd Party appeared through their Learned Counsel Sh. TRR on 01.12.2020.So far, parties have not

filed their respective statement.On 01.12.2020 a Memo is filed by Sh. MD for the 1^st Party which reads thus:

“I Party / Union had espoused the dispute with regard to demands of workers / un-loaders in the

packing plant of Cement Corporation of India, Kurkunta, before the Conciliation Officer, Gulbarga.

However, when the matter was referred to this Hon’ble Tribunal for adjudication the order of

reference was entirely different and irrelevant. Subsequently, I Party / Union has sought

corrigendum from the Ministry of Labour, Government of India, which is yet to be issued by the

concerned Authority. Hence, I Party / Union is approaching the Central Government, Ministry of

Labour to get fresh order of reference on the dispute.

In view of the above, I Party does not want to press the above case for adjudication.

WHEREFORE, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dispose of the case (order of reference) as

“NOT PRESSED” in the interest of justice and equity’’.

In view of the above memo now it is not required to record any finding on the referred issue.

AWARD

Reference is Rejected.

(Dictated to U D C, transcribed by him, corrected and signed by me on 2^nd DECEMBER 2020)

Justice Smt. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

3208 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 26, 2020/PAUSHA 5, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 16 fnlEcj] 2020

का.आ. 1101.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;

ljdkj

फ़ूड कारपोरेिन ऑफ़ इंजडया ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k – सि - Je U;k;ky;] बैंगलोर

ds iapkV

¼lanHkZ f'kdk;r la[;k 01@2007½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 08-12-2020 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-22013@01@2020-vkbZvkj- ¼lh,e- II½]

jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 16th December, 2020

S.O. 1101.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. Complain No. 01/2007) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-

cum-Labour, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s.

Food Corporation of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 08.12.2020.

[No. L-22013/01/2020-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

BANGALORE

DATED : 11^THNOVEMBER, 2020

PRESENT : JUSTICE SMT. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

Comp 01/2007

Complainant

Respondents

Sri. G. Reddy,

S/o Late Sri. Gangi Reddy

Aged about 51 years,

House no. 36, Sakkanahalli village

Magoondi Post, Bangarpet Taluk

Kolar District - 563114.

1. The Area Manager [District Manager],

Food Corporation of India,

F.C.I Godown

Krishnarajapuram,

Bangalore - 560 016

The Senior Regional Manager,

Food Corporation of India,

Regional Office,

East End Main Road,

4^th T Block, Jayanagar,

Bangalore – 560 041

Appearance :

Advocate for I Party : Mr. Mr. K.T. Govinde Gowda

Advocate for II Party : Mr. B.L. Sanjeev

AWARD

It is a complaint filed under the Sec 33-A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for brevity ‘the Act’) by the

former employee of the Respondent FCI.

Succinctly stated,

the Complainant was terminated from service vide order dated 11.03.2004 during the course of Dispute pending

before this Tribunal in CR No. 65/2002, CR No. 27/2002 and CR No. 25/2003, of which the Complainant was a

concerned workman: before his termination from the service, the Respondent has not complied with mandatory

procedure contemplated by Proviso to 33 (2) of ‘the Act’. The Respondent has not delivered the dismissal order

to him and has not paid one-month wages and has not submitted necessary approval application for

confirmation of the dismissal order under sec 33 of the ID Act before this Court. The action of the Respondent

is highly illegal and not sustainable in law. His date of birth is 01.07.1961, therefore, he is entitled to be

continued on service till he attains the age of superannuation i.e. 01.07.2021. Before terminating him from

service, he was not issued charge sheet, show cause notice and no Enquiry was conducted against him.

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 26, 2020/पौष 5, 1942

3209

The defence of the Respondent is,

the Complainant is dismissed after following the procedure prescribed under the law. The Dismissal order was

issued by the District Office of the Respondent to the work spot of the Depot, wherein the Complainant was

working. If the said order / information was not received by the Complainant, it is because he did not attend the

duty on the same day or on subsequent days. Dismissal order was sent to his last known address but the postal

cover returned with a shara that the ‘addressee is not available’. Since, provision was made in the dismissal

order for appeal within 45 days, payment of one-month salary was not considered during the pendency of the

appeal. Several notices were issued to the Complainant against his long period of absence and he was informed

that he would be terminated for the same cause. Even though, several letters / summons were sent to him

through R.P.A.D to attend the Enquiry, to his last known address, same had returned and finally the matter was

decided ex-parte. He was issued termination letter after conducting proper Enquiry prescribed under ‘the Act’

vide memo dated 31.12.2001, he was called to explain his misconduct and after getting explanation, he was

permitted to join duty but again he remained absent for which Enquiry was held on 09.01.2002. Again based on

explanation submitted by him, he was permitted to join the duty on 02.05.2002 but he did not join the duty

instead he submitted a representation on 23.07.2002 which was examined and found to be false. He was not

serious or sincere in performing his duties and was in the habit of abstaining from the work without giving any

information.

Both parties have adduced evidence and produced documents: Ex C-1 to C-3 are marked for

Complainant: Ex R-1 to R-8 are marked for Respondent / FCI. Written argument is submitted for the

Complainant and oral argument is addressed by the learned Counsel for the Respondent.

For our purpose we will read Sec 33 (2) (b) of ‘the Act’ which is said to be violated leading to the

Complaint under Sec 33 A.

“(2) During the pendency of any such proceeding in respect of an industrial dispute, the employer may,

in accordance with the standing orders applicable to a workman concerned in such dispute [or, where

there are no such standing orders, in accordance with the terms of the contract, whether express or

implied, between him and the workman],--

(a)

……………… … … … … … …

(b) for any misconduct not connected with the dispute, or discharge or punish, whether by dismissal

or otherwise, that workman:

Provided that no such workman shall be discharged or dismissed, unless he has been paid wages for

one month and an application has been made by the employer to the authority before which the

proceeding is pending for approval of the action taken by the employer.”

It is clear from the above that though an employee who is connected with the pending dispute is to be punished,

discharged or dismissed in respect of any other misconduct, that should be done only after paying one-month

wages to him, simultaneously the employer shall make an application to the Authority, in our case before this

Tribunal for approval of the action taken against the workman. The punishment shall be imposed in accordance

with the provisions of the standing orders applicable to the workman or in terms of the contract. It is not the

case of 2^ndParty that any such application was made to this Tribunal seeking permission to terminate the service

of the concerned workman.

The three cases cited by the Complainant are CR 27/2002, 25/2003 and 65/2002. The issues referred

for adjudication in those cases are as follows

CR 27/2002 – whether the claim of the FCI Loading and Unloading Workers Union for the payment

of increased tender rate of wages for the earlier period in respect of White-Field (Bangalore) and

Unkal (Hubli) depot is legal and justified? If yes, what relief the workmen are entitled to?

II.

CR 65/2002 – whether the demand of FCI Loading and Unloading Workers Union claiming equal

pay for equal work w.e.f 01.11.1990 and re-introduction of monthly pay scale for DPS workers

w.e.f. 01.09.2001 is justified? If so, what relief the workmen are entitled to?

III.

CR 25/2003 – whether the FCI Loading and Unloading Workers Union is justified in claiming the

wages of Sardars and Mandals in the FCI Godowns at K.R.P.G., White-Field, Unkal-Hubli, K.R.

Nagar and Nanjungoodu for 16 DPS labourers? If yes, what relief they are entitled to and from

which date?

All the three cases are adjudicated and the award is published in the official Gazette: in CR

No. 27/2002, CR No. 25/2003 and the references are rejected, whereas in CR No. 65/2002, reference is partly

accepted.

3210 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 26, 2020/PAUSHA 5, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

In the case on hand, the Complainant was a Handling Worker in the FCI godown, thus, a concerned

workman in the above references pending before this Court. He was dismissed on the charges of unauthorised

and long absence w.e.f 15.03.2004 onwards vide Ex R-5.

Copy of the un-served memo cum articles of charge and the returned postal cover are produced as Ex

R-3 and Ex R-4.As per the memo / articles of charge / Ex R-5, the misconduct or unauthorised absence for long

period is liable for severe disciplinary action as per the model standing orders.

It is a fact that the workman was not paid one month wage and application seeking approval of the

action taken was not filed before this Authority before terminating him from service. The contravention of

mandate of proviso to Sec 33 2(b) has enabled the aggrieved employee to file the present complaint, before this

Tribunal under sec 33 A of ‘the Act’. Under Sec 33 A (b), it is the mandate that such complaint shall be

adjudicated, as if it is a ‘dispute referred to’ or “pending” in accordance with the provisions of this act.

Though, the 2^nd Party has some material at it’s disposal to state that since the workman was not

attending the duty as on the date of his removal dated 15.03.2004, they were not able to serve the termination

order and pay one-month wages to him personally. But what about the omission on their part in not filing an

application seeking approval of the action taken against the Complainant? It is a major lapse on their part and

goes to the root of the matter. The complaint is filed after a long lapse of 3 years of the termination. However,

Sec 33-A does not contemplate any limitation period for filing such complaint.

The Apex Court in the judgment reported in LAWS(SC) 1971 8 56 in the matter of HINDUSTHAN

GENERAL ELECTRICAL CORPORATION VERSUS BISHWANATH PRASAD held as below

9. The scope of sections 33 and 33-A was examined by this Court in several cases to some of which we

shall presently refer. Section 33 (1) has obviously no application to the facts of this case. Section 33

(2) relates to the dismissal, discharge etc. of a workman for any misconduct not connected with an

industrial dispute during the pendency of any conciliation proceeding before a conciliation officer or a

Board etc. unless he had been paid wages for one month and an application has been made by the

employer to the authority before which the proceeding is pending for approval of the action taken by

the employer. Section 33-A enables a workman who has been punished by dismissal or discharge etc.

to make a complaint in writing to a labour court, tribunal or National Tribunal when an employer

contravenes the provisions of S. 33 during the pendency of proceedings before Labour Court. Tribunal

or National Tribunal etc. If such a complaint is made, the labour court, tribunal etc. is to adjudicate

upon the complaint as if it were a dispute referred to or pending before it and in accordance with the

provisions of the Act submit its award to the appropriate Government. In other words, when the

conditions laid down in S. 33-A apply a workman who is punished as mentioned therein does not have

to wait for a reference of an industrial dispute by an appropriate authority under S. 10 of the Act for

adjudication of the dispute but can himself prefer his complaint which is to be treated in the same way

as a dispute under S. 10. These sections do not lend themselves to the construction that as soon as the

Labour Court, Tribunal etc. finds that there has been a violation of S. 33 it should award

reinstatement. It must go through the proceedings which would have to be taken under S. 10 and it

would be the duty of the labour court etc. to examine the merits of the case in the light of the principles

formulated in the Indian Iron and Steel Co.'s case (1958) SCR 667.

That takes us to enquire into the merits of the dismissal order independently, though there is glaring

violation of proviso to Sec 33 2(b) of ‘the Act’.

The documents marked by both the parties are undisputed. A notice / R-1 dated 08.01.2004 was

addressed to him, on his absence w.e.f 06.11.2003 onwards and he was directed to report for duty immediately.

Ex R-2 is the postal acknowledgement from the Complainant for having received the said notice. In the memo /

article of charge / Ex R-3 dated 25.02.2004, it was alleged that he remained unauthorisedly absent for a long

period of 110 days from 06.11.2003 to till date, he has not come forward to re-join duty even after the issue of

notice dated 19.01.2004, and on the said charges, Enquiry will be conducted by the Assistant Manager

(General) at District Office, FCI on 04.03.2004 at 11 am. Ex R-4 is the returned postal cover, which reflects

that the addressee was not available for service for 6 consecutive days. As per Ex R-5, dated 15.3.2004, he was

removed from the service for his unauthorised absence w.e.f 06.11.2003, giving liberty to prefer Appeal against

the said order. Ex R-6 is the returned postal cover with the punishment order. As per the postal shara on the

cover, he was not available for service continuously for 5 days.

It is the case of the workman that he was on sick leave from 06.11.2003 to 19.03.2004. He was under

treatment after recovery. He requested the officials to permit him to work from 20.03.2004 but was not allowed.

He has produced a copy of his request letter dated 31.03.2004 as Ex C-1 which is also marked as Ex R-7.

Appeal memo submitted by him as Ex C-3. In this appeal memo, he has acknowledged receipt of the

termination order dated 15.03.2004. At Ex R-7, he has stated that he was suffering from viral Hepatitis disease

and was admitted to the hospital and thereafter, he was taking bed rest in his daughter’s house: he has sought to

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 26, 2020/पौष 5, 1942

3211

consider his leave and take him back to duty and undertakes that he will be regular for duty and will not take

leave. The Photostat copy of his medical certificate and fitness certificate issued by Medical Officer is annexed

to Ex R-7. The designation of the author of the letter is not clear. It appears that both certificates are signed

and attested at a stretch: while the Medical Certificate contemplates that the workman is suffering from Viral

Hepatitis and he requires leave for 118 days w.e.f 15.11.2003, the fitness certificate certifies that he has

recovered from illness and fit to resume duty w.e.f 29.03.2004. This representation is rejected by the Appellate

Authority vide order dated 23.06.2004 / Ex R-8. It is observed in the body of the order that his plea and

submission are found to be baseless and not trustworthy; he could sustain his family burden without this job for

such a long period. Further, not responding to the Disciplinary Authority’s communication / notices earlier to

the dismissal orders also tantamount to misconduct / disobedience and dereliction of duties which attracts

disciplinary action.

If he was really fit to report for duty on 29.03.2004, what came in his way from reporting to duty on

29.03.2004 is not explained by Complainant before this court. All he has stated in his claim statement is that he

was on sick leave from 06.11.2003 to 19.03.2004, when he requested to permit him to work w.e.f 20.03.2004,

he was not allowed. He had given a request dated 31.03.2004 to consider his leave and take him on duty. But,

as per his own Medical Certificate, he was fit to resume duty on 29.03.2004, thus his case is self-contradictory.

He has no explanation for not responding to the call notice Ex R-1 which was served on him. He has no proper

explanation for not receiving the memo / articles of charge Ex R-3. It is not his case that he was prevented from

any valid reason from appearing before the Enquiry Officer / Assistant Manager (General) on 04.03.2004. But,

that does not absolve the employee of its liability to comply the procedure contemplated by the service rules

governing the workman or Model Standing Rules, before imposing punishment on him. Hence, our further

probe is to see whether Enquiry was held by the Management in accordance to the established procedure.

Unfortunately, Enquiry Report along with the Enquiry proceedings is not produced. At the least, the

witness for the 2^ndParty has not stated anything about any such Departmental Enquiry having been held.

Nothing is stated by the 2^nd Party about any witness being examined and documents being produced in support

of the articles of charge during the Enquiry. That probabalises one thing, that no independent enquiry into the

allegations made in the articles of charge was held. On the absence of the workman on the date scheduled for

Enquiry he is terminated from service by the Disciplinary Authority. Not following the mandatory procedures

contemplated before imposing punishment has vitiated the termination order.

10.

It is his case that he is entitled to be continued in service till the age of superannuation i.e. 01.07.2021.

Considering that he filed complaint after a considerable delay and not gainfully employed till now, I hold

reinstatement with continuity of service and 40% of the back wages suffices to meet the ends of justice.

AWARD

The complaint 01/2007 filed by Sri. G Reddy is allowed.

The termination order passed against the Complainant Sri. G Reddy dated 15.03.2004 is not legal and set aside.

Respondent FCI is directed to reinstate the workman with continuity of service and 40% of the back wages

forthwith.

(Dictated to LDC, transcribed by him, corrected and signed by me on 11^th November, 2020)

Justice Smt. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 fnlEcj] 2020

का.आ. 1102.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;

ljdkj esllZ फ़ूड कारपोरेिन ऑफ़ इंजडया ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k – सि - Je U;k;ky;] बैंगलोर ds iapkV

¼lanHkZ f'kdk;r la[;k 02/2007½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 08-12-2020 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-22013@01@2020-vkbZvkj ¼lh,e-II½]

jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo

3212 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 26, 2020/PAUSHA 5, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 16th December, 2020

S.O. 1102.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. Complain No. 02/2007) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-

Labour, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Food

Corporation of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 08.12.2020.

[No. L-22013/01/2020-IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

BANGALORE

DATED : 11^THNOVEMBER, 2020

PRESENT : JUSTICE SMT. RATNAKALA, Presiding Officer

Comp 02/2007

I Party

II Party

Sh. B. Thimmarayappa,

S/o. Sri. Bodiyappa,

Since dead by his LR’s

Smt. Gowramma,

W/o. Late Sri. B. Thimmarayappa,

Sri. Manjunatha,

S/o. Late Sri. B. Thimmarayappa,

Sri. Anand,

S/o. Late Sri. B. Thimmarayappa,

Smt. Sampath,

W/o. Late Sri. B. Thimmarayappa,

Smt. Sunanda,

D/o Late Sri. B. Thimmarayappa

All are residing together at

Hoovaharasanahalli,

Magoondi Post,

Kasaba Hobli, Bangarpet Taluk,

Kolar District

The Area Manager

[District Manager],

Food Corporation of India,

F.C.I Godown

Krishnarajapuram,

Bangalore – 560 016

The Senior Regional Manager,

Food Corporation of India,

Regional Office,

East End Main Road,

4^th T Block, Jayanagar,

Bangalore – 560 041

Appearance

Advocate for I Party : Mr. Mr. K.T. Govinde Gowda

Advocate for II Party : Mr. B.L. Sanjeev

AWARD

It is a complaint filed under the Sec 33-A of Industrial Disputes, Act 1947 (for brevity ‘the Act’) by the

former employee of the Respondent FCI during the pendency of the proceedings before this Tribunal, the

Complainant expired and his legal representatives / Class 1 legal heirs are prosecuting the complaint.

Succinctly stated,

the Complainant was terminated from service vide order dated 11.03.2004 during the course of the Disputes

pending before this Tribunal in CR no. 65/2002, CR no. 27/2002 and CR no. 25/2003, of which the

Complainant was a concerned workman: before his termination from the service, the Respondent has not

complied with mandatory procedure contemplated by Proviso to 33 (2) of ‘the Act’. The Respondent has not

delivered the dismissal order to him and has not paid one-month wages and has not submitted necessary

approval application for confirmation of the dismissal order under Sec 33 of the ID Act before this Court. The

action of the Respondent is highly illegal and not sustainable in law. Before terminating him from service, he

was not issued charge sheet, show cause notice and no Enquiry was conducted against him.

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 26, 2020/पौष 5, 1942

3213

The defence of the Respondent is,

the Complainant is dismissed after following the procedure prescribed under the law. The Dismissal order was

issued by the District Office of the Respondent to the work spot of the Depot, wherein the Complainant was

working. If the said order / information was not received by the Complainant, it is because he did not join duty

on the same day or on subsequent days. Dismissal order was sent to his last known address but the postal cover

returned with a shara that the ‘addressee is not available’. Since, provision was made in the dismissal order for

appeal within 45 days, payment of one-month salary was not considered during the pendency of the appeal.

Several notices were issued to the Complainant against his long period of absence and he was informed that he

would be terminated for the same cause. Even though, several letters / summons were sent to him through

RPAD to attend the Enquiry, to his last known address, same had returned and finally the matter was decided ex

parte. He was issued termination letter after conducting proper Enquiry prescribed under ‘the Act’. Vide memo

dated 31.12.2001, he was called to explain his misconduct and after getting explanation, he was permitted to

join the duty but again he remained absent for which Enquiry was held on 09.01.2002. Again based on

explanation submitted by him, he was permitted to join the duty on 02.05.2002 but he did not join the duty,

instead he submitted a representation on 23.07.2002, which was examined and found to be false. He was not

serious or sincere in performing his duties and was in the habit of abstaining from the work without giving

information.

The Complainant adduced evidences and produced documents Ex C-1 to C-5, rebuttal evidence was

adduced by the Respondent through their Manager (General) and documents Ex R-1 to R-9 were marked.

Written argument is submitted for the Complainant and oral argument is addressed for the Respondent.

For our purpose we will read Sec 33 (2) (b) of ‘the Act’ which is said to have been violated thereby

leading to the present Complaint under Sec 33 A.

“(2) During the pendency of any such proceeding in respect of an industrial dispute, the employer may,

in accordance with the standing orders applicable to a workman concerned in such dispute [or, where

there are no such standing orders, in accordance with the terms of the contract, whether express or

implied, between him and the workman],--

(b)

…………… … … … … … … …

(b) for any misconduct not connected with the dispute, or discharge or punish, whether by dismissal

or otherwise, that workman:

Provided that no such workman shall be discharged or dismissed, unless he has been paid wages for

one month and an application has been made by the employer to the authority before which the

proceeding is pending for approval of the action taken by the employer.”

It is clear from the above that though an employee who is connected with the pending dispute is to be

punished, discharged or dismissed in respect of any other misconduct, that should be done only after paying

one-month wages to him, simultaneously the employer shall make an application to the Authority, in our case

before this Tribunal for approval of the action taken against the workman. The punishment shall be imposed in

accordance with the provisions of the standing orders applicable to the workman or in terms of the contract. It

is not the case of 2^ndParty that any such application was made to this Tribunal seeking permission to terminate

the service of the concerned workman. In that view of the matter, there is glaring violation of the procedure /

pre-requisite to the termination of the concerned workman of a pending industrial dispute.

The three cases cited by the Complainant are CR 27/2002, 25/2003 and 65/2002. The issues referred

for adjudication in those cases are as follows

CR 27/2002 – whether the claim of the FCI Loading and Unloading Workers Union for the

payment of increased tender rate of wages for the earlier period in respect of White-Field

(Bangalore) and Unkal (Hubli) depot is legal and justified? If yes, what relief the workmen are

entitled to?

II.

CR 65/2002 – whether the demand of FCI Loading and Unloading Workers Union claiming

equal pay for equal work w.e.f 01.11.1990 and re-introduction of monthly pay scale for DPS

workers w.e.f. 01.09.2001 is justified? If so, what relief the workmen are entitled to?

III.

CR 25/2003 – whether the FCI Loading and Unloading Workers Union is justified in claiming

the wages of Sardars and Mandals in the FCI Godowns at K.R.P.G., White-Field, Unkal-Hubli,

K.R. Nagar and Nanjungoodu for 16 DPS labourers? If yes, what relief they are entitled to and

from which date?

3214 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 26, 2020/PAUSHA 5, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

All the three cases are adjudicated and the award is published in the official Gazette: in CR No.

27/2002, CR No. 25/2003 and the references are rejected, whereas in CR No. 65/2002, reference is partly

accepted. The Complainant herein was a Handling Worker at the Godown of White-field, thus was a concerned

workman in the above pending reference cases.

Though the disputes (supra) are now disposed off, it has no bearing on adjudication of the complaint

on its merits. The crux of the entire matter being compliance of the mandatory procedure by the employer

before terminating the employee, while disputes concerning him were still pending before this Authority.