915 GI/2021

(387)

रजिस्ट्री सं. डी.एल. (एन) 04/0007/2003—05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

xxxGIDHxxx

xxxGIDExxx

प्राजिकार से प्रकाजित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप् ताजिक

WEEKLY

सं. 08]

नई दिल् ली, फरवरी 21—फरवरी 27, 2021 िजनवार/फाल् गुन 2— फाल् गुन 8, 1942

No. 08] NEW DELHI, FEBRUARY 21– FEBRUARY 27, 2021, SATURDAY/ PHALGUNA 2 –PHALGUNA 8, 1942

इस भाग में जभन् न ृष्‍ सं्‍ ा िी िाती िज जिससे दक ि ृष क संकलन के प ृ में र ा िा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II— ण् ड 3—उृ- ण् ड (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्राल ों (रक्षा मंत्राल को छोड़कर) द्वारा िारी दकए गए सांजवजिक आिेि और अजिसूचनाएं

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

कार्मिक, लोक जिका त और ृेंिन मंत्राल

(कार्मिक और प्रजिक्षण जवभाग)

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी, 2021

का. आ. 147.—केन् र सरकार, एतिद्वारा दिल् ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना अजिजन म, 1946 (1946 का

25) की िारा 5 की उृ-िारा (1) सृठ त िारा 6 द्वारा प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए रािस्ट् ान सरकार, गषि

(िीआर-V) जवभाग, ि ृुर की दिनांक 17.12.2020 की अजिसूचना सं. एफ.19 (44) गषि-5/2020 के माध् म से

िारी रािस्ट् ान राज् सरकार की सिमजत से, वठरष्ठ प्रबंिक, ृंिाब नेिनल बैंक, समता नगर िा ा, बीकानेर,

रािस्ट् ान द्वारा श्री संि बंसल, प्रोप्राइटर मेससि संि रेडडंग कंृनी, 105, नई मंडी, बीकानेर एवं अन् ों के जवप द्ध

बैंक के सा िो ािड़ी करने और इसे लगभग 473.66 ला रुृ े की सिोष िाजन काठरत करने के संबंि में िर्ि

सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-08032021-225706

CG-DL-W-08032021-225706

388 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कराई गई जिका त दिनांदकत 24.06.2020 से संबंजित अृराि(िों) का अन्वेषण त ा ऐसे अृराि(िों) से िुड़े ा

उससे संबद्ध दकसी िु्‍प्र ास, िु्‍प्रेरणा और/अ वा षड्यंत्र एवं/अ वा उसी संव्यविार में दकए गए ा उन्िीं तथ् ों से

उत्ृन्न दकसी अन् अृराि का अन्वेषण करने के जलए दिल्ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृनाके सिस्ट् ों की िजि ों और

क्षेत्राजिकार का जवस्ट्तार समस्ट्त रािस्ट् ान राज् में करती िज।

[फा. सं. 228/03/2021-एवीडी-II]

एस. ृी. आर. जत्रृा ी, अवर सजचव

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department of Personnel and Training)

New Delhi, the 23rd February, 2021

S. O. 147.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of

the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 ( 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the

State Government of Rajasthan, issued vide Notification No. F.19(44) Home-5/2020 dated 17.12.2020 of

Government of Rajasthan, Home (Gr.-V) Department, Jaipur, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the

members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole State of Rajasthan for investigation into the

offence(s) arising out of the complaint dated 24.06.2020 lodged by Senior Manager, Punjab National Bank,

Samta Nagar Branch, Bikaner, Rajasthan against Shri Sanjay Bansal, Proprietor of M/s. Sanjay Trading

Company, 105, Nai Mandi, Bikaner and others, pertaining to cheating the Bank and causing wrongful loss to it

of approx. Rs. 473.66 lakhs and any attempt, abetment and/or conspiracy, in relation to or in connection with

such offence(s) and/or for any other offence committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of

the same facts.

[F. No. 228/03/2021-AVD-II]

S. P. R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी, 2021

का. आ. 148.—केन् र सरकार, एतद्द्वारा दिल् ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना अजिजन म, 1946 (1946 का 25)

की िारा 5 की उृ-िारा (1) सृठ त िारा 6 द्वारा प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए रािस्ट् ान सरकार, गषि

(िीआर-V) जवभाग, ि ृुर की दिनांक 28.12.2020की अजिसूचना सं. एफ. 19(44)गषि-5/2020 के माध् म से

िारी रािस्ट् ान राज् सरकार की सिमजत से, सिा क मिाप्रबंिक (िा ा प्रमु ), ृंिाब नेिनल बैंक, जमड

कॉृोरेट ब्ांच, चंबर भवन, एम.आई. रोड, ि ृुर द्वारा मेससि रेणुका फामिसि एलएलृी, 802-ए, के.िे. जसटी टावर,

सी-स्ट्कीम, ि ृुर एवं अन् ों के जवप द्ध बैंक के सा िो ािड़ी करने और इसे लगभग 879.84 ला प ृ े की सिोष

िाजन काठरत करने के संबंि में िर्ि कराई गई जिका त दिनांदकत 20.05.2020 (सं. सीए 0302020ए0232) से

संबंजित अृराि(िों) का अन्वेषण त ा ऐसे अृराि(िों) से िुड़े ा उससे संबद्ध दकसी िु्‍प्र ास, िु्‍प्रेरणा

और/अ वा षड्यंत्र एवं/अ वा उसी संव्यविार में दकए गए ा उन्िीं तथ् ों से उत्ृन्न दकसी अन् अृराि काअन्वेषण

करने के जलए दिल्ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृनाके सिस्ट् ों की िजि ों और क्षेत्राजिकार का जवस्ट्तार समस्ट्त रािस्ट् ान

राज् में करती िज।

[फा. सं. 228/04/2021-एवीडी-II]

एस.ृी.आर. जत्रृा ी, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 23rd February, 2021

S. O. 148.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of

the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 ( 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the

State Government of Rajasthan, issued vide Notification No. F.19(44)Home-5/2020 dated 28.12.2020 of

Government of Rajasthan, Home (Gr.-V) Department, Jaipur, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

389

members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole State of Rajasthan for investigation into the

offence(s) arising out of the complaint dated 20.05.2020 lodged by Assistant General Manager (Branch Head),

Punjab National Bank, Mid Corporate Branch, Chamber Bhawan, M.I. Road, Jaipur against M/s. Renuka

Farmers LLP, 802-A, K.J. City Tower, C-Scheme, Jaipur and others (numbered as CA0302020A0232)

pertaining to cheating the Bank and causing wrongful loss to it of approx. Rs. 879.84 lakhs and any attempt,

abetment and/or conspiracy, in relation to or in connection with such offence(s) and/or for any other offence

committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.

[F. No. 228/04/2021-AVD-II]

S. P. R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी, 2021

का. आ. 149.— केंरी सरकार, िंड प्रदि ा संजिता, 1973 (1974 का 2) की िारा 24 की उृिारा (8)

द्वारा प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, श्री एिार् सलीम ान, अजिवक् ता को, ृरीक्षण न् ा ाल और जवजि द्वारा

स्ट् ाजृत दकसी अृील ा ृुनरीक्षण न् ा ाल ों के समक्ष अृील, ृुनरीक्षण ा इस मामले से उद्भूत अन् मामलों में

दिल्ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृन (सीबीआई) द्वारा संजस्ट् त मामला सं्‍ ा आरसी 1(एस)/2009/ सीबीआई/एससीबी/

मुंबई (ृवनरािे जनम्बालकर ित् ा प्रकरण) का जवचारण करने के जलए उनकी जन ुजि की तारी से तीन वषि की

अवजि के जलए ा मामले के जनृटान की तारी तक, इनमें से िो भी ृिले िो, जविेष लोक अजभ ोिक के प ृ में

जन ुक् त करती िज ।

[फा. सं. 225/16/2020-एवीडी-II]

एस.ृी.आर. जत्रृा ी, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 23rd February, 2021

S. O. 149.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section(8) of section 24 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Ejaz Salim Khan,

Advocate as Special Public Prosecutor for conducting trial of the case number RC-1 (S) /2009 /CBI /SCB

/Mumbai (Pawanraje Nimbalkar Murder Case), instituted by Delhi Special Police Establishment (CBI) in the

trial Court and appeals, revisions or other matters arising out of this case before any appellate or revisional

Courts established by law, for a period of three years from the date of appointment or till the date of disposal of

the case, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 225/16/2020-AVD-II]

S. P. R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

स्ट् वास्ट् थ् एवं ृठरवार कल् ाण मंत्राल

(स्ट् वास्ट् थ् एवं ृठरवार कल् ाण जवभाग)

नई दिल् ली, 10 दिसम् बर, 2020

का. आ. 150.—केंरी सरकार, िंतजचदकत्सक अजिजन म, 1948 (1948 का 16) की िारा-3 के अंतगित

प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, एति् द्वारा भारत सरकार, स्ट्वास्ट्थ् एवं ृठरवार कल् ाण मंत्राल की दिनांक

24 िनवरी, 1984 की अजिसूचना का. आ. 430 में जनम्नजलज त संिोिन करती िज, नामतः

2. उि अजिसूचना में “िारा-3 के ंड (क) के अंतगित जनवािजचत िीषि” में जनम्नजलज त प्रजवष्ट दक ा िाएगा, नामतः

390 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

सिस्ट् का नाम

जवजि

प्रजतजनजित्व वाली राज् िंतजचदकत्सा

ृठरषि

प्रभावी िोने

की तारी

डॉ. गौरव गुप्ता, प्रोफेसर एवं अध् क्ष,

प्रोस्ट् ोडोंठटक्स जवभाग,

जिमाचल िंतजचदकत्सा जवज्ञान संस्ट् ान,

ृौटांसाजिब,

जिला-जसरमौर-173025,

जिमाचल प्रिेि

जनवािजचत

जिमाचल प्रिेि राज् िंतजचदकत्सा

ृठरषि

22.12.2018

[फा. सं. वी12025/142/2020-डीई]

डी. वी. के. राव, उृ सजचव

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

(Department of Health and Family Welfare)

New Delhi, the 10th December, 2020

S.O. 150.—In exercise of the powers conferred under Section 3 of the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of 1948),

the Central Government hereby makes the following amendment in the notification of the Government of India

in the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare No. S.O. 430 dated 24th January, 1984, namely:

2.

In the said notification under head “elected under clause (a) of Section 3”, the following shall be

inserted therein, namely:

Name of the member

Mode

State Dental Council represented

w.e.f.

“Dr. Gaurav Gupta,

Prof. & Head,

Deptt. Of Prosthodontics, Himachal

Institute of Dental Sciences, Paonta

Sahib, Dist. Sirmour – 173 025,

Himachal Pradesh

Elected

Himachal

Pradesh

State

Dental

Council

22.12.2018”

[F. No. V.12025/142/2020-DE]

D.V.K. RAO Dy. Secy.

श्रम एवं रोिगार मंत्राल

नई दिल् ली, 3 फरवरी, 2021

का.आ. 151

—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्री सरकार

ijek.kq [kkfut vUos"k.k ,oa vuqla/kku funs'kky;] if'pe {ks=] ijek.kq mtkZ foHkkx] ि ृुर (राि) के प्रबंितंत्र

के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री राम िमाि, कामगार के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्ििष्ट औद्योजगक जववाि में केन्री सरकार

औद्योजगक अजिकरण- सि- श्रम न् ा ाल , ि ृुर के ृंचाट (संिभि सं्‍ ा 24/2011) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में

दि ा ा ग ा िज, प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्री सरकार को 03.02.2021 को प्राप्त हुआ ा।

[सं. एल-14012/4/2009-आईआर (डी ू)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

391

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 3rd February, 2021

S.O. 151.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 24/2011) of the Central Government Industrial-Tribunal-cum

Labour Court Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

The Atomic Mineral Directorate for Exploration and Research, Department of Atomic Energy, Jaipur (raj) and

Shri Ram Sharma, Worker which was received by the Central Government on 03.02.2021.

[No. L-14012/4/2009 IR (DU)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

jk/kk eksgu prqosZnh

ihBklhu vf/kdkjh

Reference No. L-14012/4/2009-IR(DU) Dated:13.7.2011

Jh jke 'kekZ iq= Jh yYyw yky 'kekZ fuoklh IykV 13@14] iapoVh dkyksuh] Vksd jksM pkS/kjh isVªksy iai ds lkeus

lkaxkusj] t;iqjA

ijek.kq [kkfut vUos"k.k ,oa vuqla/kku funs'kky; if'pe {ks=]

ijek.kq mtkZ foHkkx] Hkkjr ljdkj ,- ,e- Mh- dEiysDl- lsDVj&5]

foLrkj izrki uxj lkaxkusj] t;iqj& }kjk funs'kd

---vizkFkhZ@foi{kh

izkFkhZx.k dh rjQ ls % Jh dq.kky jkor vf/koDrk

vizkFkhZx.k dh rjQ ls % Jh nsos'k dqekj caly vf/koDrk

fnukad % 29-12-2020

1-

Je ,oa fu;kstu ea=ky; Hkkjr ljdkj ubZ fnYyh }kjk fnukad 13-07-2011 dks vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e

1947 ¼ftls vkxs ek= vf/kfu;e dgk tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 10 ¼1½ ¼Mh½ ds vUrxZr iznRr 'kfDr;ksa ds vuqlj.k esa

mi;qZDr ikaWapksa izkFkhZx.k ds laEc/k esa fuEukafdr ¼lesfdr :i esa½ fookn U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq bl vf/kdj.k dks lanfHkZr

fd;s x;s %&

“Whether the action of the Management of Atomic Mineral Directorate for Exploration and Research,

Department of Atomic Energy, Jaipur in terminating the services of (1) Sh. Shri Ram Sharma s/o

Shri Lallu Lal Sharma, (2) Shri Dhanna Lal s/o Shri Jagdish Bairwa, (3) Shri Rakesh Kumar Upadhyay

s/o Shri Hari Kishan Sharma, (4) Shri Chhagan Lal Dhanka s/o Shri Gulab Chand Dhanka and (5)

Shri Manoj Kumar Pipliwal s/o Shri kanhaiya Lal Pipliwal. w.e.f. 30.04.2008 is legal and justified?

What relief the workmen are entitled to? ’’

2-

mi;qZDr ik¡pksa fookn bl vf/kdj.k dks izkIr gksus ij mHk;i{k dks vkgwr djrs gq,& izkFkhZx.k dks funsZ'k

fn;k x;k fd os vius nkos dk vfHkdFku izLrqr djasA rnqijkar izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls fnukad 04-10-2011 dks nkos ds

vfHkdFku izLrqr fd;s x;sA izkFkhZx.k ds dFku la{ksi esa bl izdkj of.kZr gSaA izkFkhZx.k dks 05-07-2005 ls 10-01-2006

ds e/; fofHkUu frfFk;ksa ij prqFkZ Js.kh ¼gsYij rduhdh lgk;d½ ds in ij vizkFkhZ }kjk fu;qDr fd;k x;kA

izkFkhZx.k iRFkj ds uewuksa dh filkbZ] NukbZ] f?klkbZ o vU; dk;kZy;h dk;Z vizkFkhZ ds vf/kdkfj;kas ds fn'kk funsZ'k ij

djrs FksA vizkFkhZ laLFkku m|ksx dh ifjHkk"kk esa vkrk gSaA izkFkhZx.k dks vizkFkhZ us fnukad 30-04-2008 dks voS/k :Ik ls

lsok eqDr dj fn;kA

3-

izkFkhZx.k o vizkFkhZ ds e/; fu;kstd&deZdkj ds laca/k FksA izkFkhZx.k dh lsok eqfDr ls iwoZ /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½

vf/kfu;e ds vuqlkj uksfVl@uksfVl osru o {kfriwfrZ jkf'k dk Hkqxrku izkFkhZx.k dks ugha fd;k x;kA izkFkhZx.k ls tks

dk;Z djok;k tk jgk Fkk og LFkkbZ izd`fr dk Fkk o vkt Hkh vU; Jfedkas ls djok;k tk jgk gSA izkFkhZx.k us 240

fnu ls vf/kd fnuksa rd yxkrkj dk;Z fd;k gSA vizkFkhZ us Jfedksa dh ofj"Brk lwph ugha cukbZ u gh dksbZ ?kjsyw

tkWap dh& rFkk vuqfpr Je O;ogkj fd;kA bl izdkj /kkjk 25] ¼,Q½@ ¼th½@ ¼,p½ vf/kfu;e o fu;e 77 o 78

ds izko/kkuks dk mYya?ku fd;k gSA izkFkhZx.k lsok eqfDr ds Ik'pkr ls csjkstxkj gaSA vr% fnukad 30-04-2008 dks dh

392 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

xbZ izkFkhZx.k dh lsok lekfIr dks voS| ?kksf"kr djrs gq, izkFkhZx.k dks foxr osru o ifjykHkksa lfgr lsok esa cgky

fd;k tkosA

4-

vizkFkhZ@foi{kh us fnukad 04-07-2012 dks ikWapksa izdj.kksa esa oknksÙkj izLrqr djrs gq, ;g dgk gSa fd izkFkhZx.k

dks fdlh in ij fu;qfDr ugha nh xbZ] cfYd vko';d dk;Z djus ds fy, vkdfLed Jfed ds :Ik esa va'kdkyhu

lafonk ds vk/kkj ij j[kk x;k FkkA blfy, lsok eqfDr dk iz'u gh mRiUu ugha gksrk gSA vizkFkhZ m|ksx dh Js.kh esa

ugha vkrk gSA izkFkhZx.k dks dk;Z miyC/krk ij tkjh fufonk o fu/kkZfjr ctV esa dk;Z lEiUu djus gsrq j[kk tkus ls

,slh fu;qfDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2 ¼vks vks½s ¼ch ch½ ds vUrZxr vkrh gS o /kkjk 25&,Q ds izko/kku vkd`"V gh ughs

gksrs gSaA izkFkhZx.k ,d o"kZ esa 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z djuk izekf.kr ugha dj ik;s gSaA vizkFkhZ }kjk vf/kfu;e o

fu;eksa dh vogsyuk ugha dh xbZ gS u gh dksbZ vuqfpr Je vH;kl fd;k x;k gSaA fdlh vU; Jfed dks dk;Z gsrq

ugha yxk;k x;k gSA vr% okn vLohdkj fd;s tkosaA

5-

izkFkhZx.k us 24-09-2012 dks oknksRrj dk [kaMu djrs gq, vfrfjDr dFku Hkh izLrqr fd;s gSa&vkSj iqu% nkos

ds vfHkdFkuksa dks Lohdkj djus dk fuosnu fd;k gSaA

6-

mi;qZDr ik¡pksa fookn izdj.kksa esa izkFkhZx.k ds vfHkdFku o oknksRrj leku gSa rFkk izkFkhZx.k dh lsok dh

izd`fr o lsok lekfIr dh frfFk Hkh leku gh gSaA blfy, bu ikWapksa fooknks esa mRiUu fooknfcanq leku gksus ls bu

fooknksa dk vf/kfu.kZ;u ,dhd`r :Ik ls mHk;i{k dh lgefr ls fd;k tk jgk gSaA

7-

izkFkhZx.k us vius vius nkos ds vfHkdFku ds leZFku gsrq lk{; esa Lo;a izkFkhZ ,- M-& 1 Jh jke 'ekZ]

Jh /kUuk yky] Jh jkds'k dqekj mik/;k;] Jh Nxu yky /kkudk ,oa Jh eukst dqekj ihiyhoky dks ijhf{kr fd;k

gSA izys[kh; lk{; esa izn'kZ 1 ls 17 rd izys[kkas dks Jh jke 'kekZ ls lacaf/kr izdj.k esa iznf'kZr fd;k gSA pwafd bu

ikWapksa gh izdj.kksa esa okndkj.k] i{kdkj o lk{; dh izd`fr leku gS& mHk;i{k dh lgefr ls fookn la- 24@2011

Jh jke 'kekZ cuke funs'kd] ijek.kq [kkfut vUos"k.k ,oa vuqla/kku esa mHk;i{k }kjk izLrqr lk{; dks gh ikWapksa fooknks

ds laca/k esa izHkkoh ekudj foospu gsrq xzg.k fd;k tk jgk gSA

blh Øe esa foi{kh@vizkFkhZ us vius lk{; esa ,u- ,- M- 1 fouksn dqekj lh- ds- ¼lgk- dkfeZd vf/kdkjh½ dks ijh{kr

fd;k o izn'kZ vkj&1 ls vkj&6 izys[kksa dks iznf'kZr fd;k gSA

8-

fnukad 22-12-2017 dks bl vf/kdj.k }kjk ikWapksa fooknksa esa vf/kfu.kZ; ikfjr dj izkFkhZx.k dks dksbZ vuqrks"k

ikus dk vf/kdkjh ugha ekurs gq, nkoksa dks fujLr dj fn;k x;kA bl vf/kfu.kZ; ds fo:} izkFkhZx.k us eku- mPp

U;k;ky; esa fjV ;kfpdk izLrqr dhA eku- jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us fnukad 28-08-2019 dks fu.kZ; ikfjr djrs gq,

fjV ;kfpdk Lohdkj dj vf/kfu.kZ; fnukad 22-12-2017 dks vikLr dj fn;k rFkk ekeys bl vf/kdj.k dks iqu%

fofuf'pr djus gsrq izfrizsf"kr dj fn;sA eku- mPp U;k;ky; es ;g funsZ'k fn;k fd izkFkhZx.k }kjk ,usDlj&1

¼izkFkZuki= fnukad 27-11-2012½ ds ek/;e ls visf{kr izys[kksa dk]s tks foi{kh ds ikl miyC/k gS Je U;k;ky; ds le{k

izLrqr fd;k tkosa&rFkk izkFkhZx.k dks bu vfHkys[kksa dks ijhf{kr djus rFkk vius i{k dks LFkkfir djus dk leqfpr

volj fn;k tkosA

bl fu.kZ; ds vuqlj.k esa foi{kh dks izys[kksa ds izLrqrhdj.k dk funsZ'k fn;k x;k rFkk izLrqfrdj.k ds

mijkUr mHk;i{k dks vfrfjDr lk{; izLrqr djus dk volj Hkh fn;k x;kA izkFkhZ us vius lk{; esa iqu% ,- M- 1

Jh jke 'kekZ dks ijhf{kr fd;k rFkk vfrfjDr izys[kh lk{; esa izn'kZ W 17 iznf'kZr fd;kA foi{kh@vizkFkhZ us

vfrfjDr lk{; esa ,u- ,- M- 2 lfPpnkuaUn uk;d mi{ks=h; funs'kd o ,u- ,- M- 3 y[ku yky 'kekZ dks ijhf{kr

fd;k o izys[kh; lk{; esa izn'kZ vkj 7 ls vkj 13 rd izys[k iznf'kZr fd;sA

9-

fnukad 03-11-2020 ls 09-12-2020 rd fofHkUu frfFk;ksa ij mHk;i{k ds rdZ&forZd lqus x;s o miyC/k lk{;

dk ifj'khyu fd;k x;kA

10-

izkFkhZx.k ds vfHkHkk"kd dk ;g izeq[k rdZ gS fd ,usDlj&1 izkFkZuki= fnukad 27-11-2012 esa of.kZr o okafNr

izys[kksa dks vizkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr gh ugha fd;k x;k gS & u gh izLrqr u djus dk djus dk dksbZ larqf"Vizn dkj.k

izLrqr fd;k gSA blfy, vizkFkhZ ds fo:} ;g izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk dh tkos fd ;fn og izkfFkZr vfHkys[kksa dks izLrqr

djrs rks izkFkhZx.k dk foi{kh ds v/khu fu;fer 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Zjr jgus dk rF; izekf.kr gks tkrkA vizkFkhZ

us vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼Mh½ dh ikyuk u djrs gq, mifLFkfr dk dksbZ vfHkys[k la/kkfjr ugha fd;kA tks izys[k

foi{kh us u"V gks tkus ds dkj.k izLrqr ugha dj ikuk dgk gS muds u"V djus laca/kh dksbZ lk{; izLrqr gh ugha dh

gSaA lk{kh Jhjke 'kekZ ds iwoZorhZ 'kiFki= esa fu;qfDr frfFk 06-07-2005 =qfV o'k vafdr gks xbZ gS ftls 06-07-2006 gh

i<+k tkos tks Ik'pkrorhZ vfrfjDr lk{; 'kiFki= esa vfdr gSA vfHkys[kksa dks u"V djus dk dksbZ izek.k gh ugha gSA

foi{kh lk{kh y[ku yky Lohdkj djrk gS fd xsV jftLVj esa izfof"V fd;s fcuk dksbZ vUnj ugh tk ldrk gSA fdarq

ogh xsV jftLVj foi{kh us is'k ugh fd;k gSA Bsdsnkj }kjk fu;qfDr dk rdZ foi{kh us fn;k gS fdarq Bsdsnkj dk dksbZ

ykbZlsal izLrqr gh ugh fd;k gSaA vr% izkFkhZx.k ds nkoksa dks Lohdkj dj izkfFkZr vuqrks"k iznku fd;k tkosA mUgksaus

vius rdksZ ds leZFku esa fuEukafdr U;kf;d n`"Vkar izLrqr fd;s%

1- cSaxyksj okVj lIykbZ ,aM lhojst cksMZ cuke vkj- jktIik o vU; 1978 ,- vkbZ- vkj- 548

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

393

2- fd'ku flag cuke ,fDtfDVo bath- gfj;k.kk LVsV ,xzh- ekdsZfVax cksMZ ,- vkbZ- vkj- 2010 lq- dksVZ] ¼lIyh-½

787

3- Mk;jsDVj fQ'kjht VfeZuy fMohtu cuke Hkhdw HkkbZ es?kkth HkkbZ pkoM+k ,- vkbZ- vkj- 2010 lq- dksVZ] 1236

4- vkj- ,e- ;sykrh cuke vfl- ,DthD;wfVo bathfu;j flfoy vihy la- 5124@2004 fu.kZ;& 07-11-2005-

5- esfduksu eSadth fy- cuke esfduksu ,EiykbZt ;wfu;u flfoy vihy la- 5319@2008 lq- dksVZ] fu.kZ;&

25-02-2015-

6- fizalhiy Mwaxj dkWayst chdkusj cuke vkseizdk'k 1999 ysc- vkbZ- lh- 97 ¼jktLFkku½

7- ch- Mh- vks- izkxiqj cuke ;ksfxaUnj dqekj 2008 ¼118½ ,Q- ,y- vkj- 460 ¼fg- izns'k½

11-

vizkFkhZ ds vfHkHkk"kd dk ;g izeq[k rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k us vius iq"V lk{; ls ;g izekf.kr gh ugha fd;k gS

fd mUgksaus vizkFkhZ ds v/khu 240 fnu ls vf/kd&,d o"kZ dh vof/k esa dk;Z fd;k tcfd ;g fl}hHkkj izkFkhZx.k ij

gh vkjksfir gSA izkFkhZ Jhjke 'kekZ ¼o vU; izkFkhZx.k½ us Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mUgsa dksbZ fu;qfDr i= ugha feyk gS u gh

dksbZ vkosnu fu;qfDr gsrq fn;kA o"kZ 2005 ls 2008 rd ,d o"kZ esa fdrus fdrus fnu dk;Z fd;k ;g Hkh ;kn ugha

gSA izn'kZ W- 3 o W- 7 dk mYys[k djrs gq, mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ us Bsds ij dk;Z djus gsrq vkosnu fd;k

gSA izkFkhZx.k us ;g Hkh Lohdkj fd;k gS fd vuqyXud&3 ¼Ex. R/5½ mlls lacaf/kr gS rFkk blesa vfdar dk;Z fnol

lgh gS izn'kZ W- 10 ls W- 12 mlds Hkqxrku ls lacaf/kr gSA LohdkjksfDr ds mijkaUr fdlh izek.k dh vko';drk

'ks"k ugha jgrh gSA lk{; dh bl fLFkfr esa izkFkhZx.k dk ;g vk{ksi Lohdk;Z ugha gSa fd vizkFkhZ us mifLFkfr vfHkys[k

dk la/kkj.k ugha fd;k vFkok izLrqr ugha fd;k gSaS blfy, vizkFkhZ ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk dk dksbZ vk/kkj ugha

gSA izkFkhZ dks lafonk ds vk/kkj ij dk;Z djus gsrq fu;r mn~s'; ls j[kk x;k Fkk blfy, Hkh os vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25

¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa dk laj{k.k ugh ik ldrs gaSA vizkFkhZ vUos"k.k ,oa vuqla/kku ds dk;Z ls lac} gS tks m|ksx dh

ifjHkk"kk esa ugha vkrk gSA vr% okn vLohdkj fd;s tkosaA mUgksus vius rdZ ds leZFku esa fuEukafdr U;kf;d n`"Vkar

o vfHkys[k la/kkj.k vof/k dh foHkkxh; rkfydk dh izfr izLrqr dh gS%

1- lqjsUnz uxj fMfLVªDV iapk;r cuke Mk;k HkkbZ vejflag flfoy vihy la- 6511@2005 fu.kZ; 25-10-2005

¼lqizhe dksVZ½A

2- ,e- ih- bysfDVªflVh cksMZ cuke gfjjke flfoy vihy la- 2240@2001 fu.kZ; 27-09-2004 ¼lqizhe dksVZ½A

3- LVsV vkWaQ xqtjkr cuke izre flag ujflag ijekj ¼2001½ 9 lqizhe dksVZ dslst 713A

12-

mHk;i{k ds rdksZ] lk{; ,oa U;kf;d n`"Vkarks esa ikfjr fof/k ij lE;d fopkj djus ds mijkaUr bu fooknksa esa

fuEukafdr fookn fcanq& U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq mRiUu gq, gSa%

1- D;k vizkFkhZ@foi{kh] vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2 ¼j½ ds vFkkZUrxZr m|ksx gS\

---izkFkhZx.k

2- D;k izkFkhZx.k dks vizkFkhZ }kjk prqFkZ Js.kh ¼gsYij rduhdh lgk;d½ ds in ij tqykbZ 2005 ls tqykbZ 2006

ds e/; fu;qDr fd;k x;k rFkk izkFkhZx.k us vizkFkhZ ds v/khu 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z ,d dsys.Mj& o"kZ esa

fd;k gS\

---izkFkhZx.k

3- D;k foi{kh }kjk izkFkhZx.k dh lsok lekfIr ds iwoZ vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkukas dk vuqikyu

ugha fd;k x;k\

---izkFkhZx.k

4- D;k foi{kh }kjk deZdkjksa dh ofj"Brk lwph ugha cukbZ xbZ ,oa izkFkhZx.k dh lsok lekIr djus ds mijkaUr

izkFkhZx.k ls dfu"Brj O;fDr;ksa dks lsok esa j[kk x;k\

---izkFkhZx.k

5- vuqrks"k\

mHk;i{k ds rdksZ lk{; ,oa fof/k ij fopkj ds mijkaUr izR;sd fopkj.kh; fcUnq ij fofu'p; bl izdkj gS%

13-

izkFkhZx.k dk ;g dFku gS fd vizkFkhZ laLFkku dh tks xfrfof/k;kWa gSa] og m|ksx dh ifjHkk"kk esa vkrh gSaA

iRFkj ds uewuksa ds ijh{k.k ls ;wjsfu;e dh igpku gksrh Fkh] mlh ds vk/kkj ij ;wjsfu;e dk mRiknu gksrk FkkA blds

foijhr foi{kh dk ;g rdZ gS fd vizkFkhZ ijek.kq [kfut] vUos"k.k o vuqla/kku ds dk;Z esa jr gS tks m|ksx dh

ifjHkk"kk esa ugha vkrk gSA

14-

bl lUnHkZ esa foi{kh lk{kh fouksn dqekj lh- ds- dk izfrijh{kk esa fd;k x;k ;g dFku egRoiw.kZ gS fd

uewuksa ds ijh{k.k ls ;g irk pyrk gS fd inkFkZ ;wjsfu;e gS vFkok ugha\ ;fn ;wjsfu;e gksrk gS rks mldk mi;ksx

ijek.kq la;a= esa fo|qr mRiknu esa iz;ksx fd;k tkrk gSA bl izdkj mRikfnr fo|qr miHkksDrkvksa iz;ksx esa vkrh gSA

bl leLr izfØ;k esa ekuo ,oa e'khu dk iz;ksx gksrk gSA bl dFku ls ;g mi/kkj.kk ljyrk ls dh tk ldrh gS

fd mRikfnr fo|qr ds miHkksDrkvksa dks foØ; ls izfrQy Lo:i /kujkf'k izkIr gksrh gh gSA vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2 ¼j½

394 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ds vUrZxr ßm|ksxÞ ls fu;kstdksa dk dksbZ dkjckj] O;olk;] miØe] fofuekZ.k ;k vkthfodk vfHkizsr gSaA izkFkhZx.k dh

vksj ls izLrqr fu.kZ; cSaxyksj okVj lIykbZ ,aM lhojst cksMZ cuke vkj- jktIik esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; us dfri;

egRoiw.kZ fn'kk funsZ'k izfrikfnr fd;s gS&rnquqlkj tgkWa dk;Zdykiks ds lapkyu gsrq ra=kRed O;oLFkk tks fu;kstd o

deZdkjksa ds lgdkj ls laxfBr gks] ftlesa lh/kk o lkjoku rRo O;olkf;d gks] tks ekuo mi;ksx ;k lsokFkZ mRiknu

o mlds forj.k ls lacaf/kr gks& ,slk midze Þm|ksxß gksrk gSA

15-

bl laca/k esa ykHk] gsrqd ;k ykHkkFkZ mn~s'; dh vuqifLFkfr vlaxr gksrh gS rFkk fu;kstd& fu;ksftr ds

e/; laca/kijd dk;Zdyki ij gh cy nsrs gq, fu/kkZj.k visf{kr gksrk gSA foi{kh }kjk LVsV vkWaQ xqtjkr cuke izre

flag ujflag ijekj ds fu.kZ; esa eku- lokZsPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vf/ker dk voyac ysrs gq, ;g dgk gS fd Hkkjr

ljdkj ds ijek.kq mtkZ foHkkx ds v/khu lapkfyr vUos"k.k laLFkku dks m|ksx dh ifjHkk"kk esa ugh j[kk tk ldrk gS

D;ksafd ;g laizHkqrk iw.kZ d`R; dk ,d Hkkx gSA izkFkhZ us ,sls dksbZ rF; izLrqr ugha fd;s gS ftlls vizkFkhZ ds m|ksx

gksus dk rF; fu"dkf"kZr fd;k tk ldsA eSaus bl rdZ o izfrikfnr fof/k ij euu fd;k gSA

16-

izkFkhZ us ;g rF; HkyhHkkWfr izekf.kr fd;k gS fd foi{kh @vizkFkhZ ;|fi ijek.kq mtkZ foHkkx ds v/khu

ijek.kq [kfut vUos"k.k o vuqla/kku dk dk;Z djrk gS& fdarq vizkFkhZ }kjk laikfnr dk;Zdyki tSlk fd foi{kh ds

lk{kh fouksn dqekj lh- ds- }kjk of.kZr gSa& foi{kh dks Þm|ksxß dh ifjHkk"kk ds varxZr ykus dk vk/kkj izdV gksrs gSaSA

uewuksa gsrq fy;s x;s [kfut inkFkksZ dk ijh{k.k o rnqijkar mudk fo|qr ds O;olkf;d mRiknu esa iz;ksx] fuf'pr :Ik

ls Þm|ksxßesa lapkfyr izfØ;k ekuh tk ldrh gS foi{kh laLFkku ijek.kq mtkZ foHkkx dk vax gS tks ijek.kq fo|qr dk

mRiknu Hkh djrk gSA

17-

vf/kfu;e esa micaf/kr ifjHkk"kk o loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vf/kerksa ds izdk'k esa foi{kh }kjk lk{; esa

iznf'kZr i= iznZ'k vkj&1 esa of.kZr fofu'p; ftlesa Je o fof/k ea=ky; }kjk foi{kh laLFkku dks vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk

2 ¼j½ ds vUrZxr ßm|ksxÞ ugha ekuk x;k gS& fdlh izdkj Lohdk;Z ,oa xzkà; ugha gSA foi{kh laLFkku esa ,sls [kfut

dk ijh{k.k o vuqla/kku fd;k tkrk gS& tks ;wjsfu;e izekf.kr gksus ij fo|qr ds O;olkf;d mRiknu esa iz;qDr gksrk

gS& ;g fookfnr ugha gS fd bl izdkj mRikfnr fo|qr ds fodz; ls foi{kh dks O;olkf;d /kuktZu gksrk gSA blfy,

foi{kh laLFkku fuf'pr :Ik ls ßm|ksxÞ gksuk izekf.kr gksrk gSA vr% ;g fcanq izkFkhZx.k ds i{k esa fu.kZr fd;k tkrk

gSaA

18-

1- bl lanHkZ esa izkFkhZ Jhjke 'kekZ us viuh eq[; ijh{kk fnukad 30-01-2020 esa dgk gS fd mldh fu;qfDr

vizkFkhZ fu;kstd ds ;gkWa 06-07-2006 dks prqFkZ Js.kh ¼rduhdh lgk;d½ ds in ij gqbZ FkhA izkFkhZ us

vius iwoZ 'kiFk i= fnukad 06-07-2014 esa fu;qfDr frfFk 06-07-2005 of.kZr dh gS] fdarq vfHkHkk'kd izkFkhZ

us bls Vad.k dh =qfV dgrs gq, 06-07-2006 gh ekuus dk fuosnu fd;k & bl fuosnu ij foi{kh us

vkifRr ugha dh gS& vr% fu;qfDr frfFk 06-07-2006 gh lk{; esa xzg.k dh tk jgh gSaA

19-

izkFkhZ us vkxkeh dFku esa 29-04-2008 rd yxkrkj dk;Z djuk o 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z djuk Hkh dgk

gSA izkFkhZ us Lo;a dh mifLFkfr foi{kh }kjk la/kkfjr xsV&jftLVj esa djuk dgk gSA izkFkhZx.k dk ;g vk{ksi gS fd

foi{kh us eku- mPp U;k;ky; }kjk fn;s x;s funsZ'k ds mijkar Hkh ,usDlj&1 ¼izkFkZuki= fnukad 27-11-2012½ esa of.kZr

vfHkys[k izLrqr ugha fd;k gS&;fn og okafNr vfHkys[k izLrqr fd;k tkrk rks izkFkhZx.k dh mifLFkfr rFkk 240 fnu

ls vf/kd foi{kh ds v/khu yxkrkj dk;Z fd;k tkuk izekf.kr gks tkrkA vr% foi{kh ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk dh

tkosaA foi{kh dk ;g rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k dks oLrqr% va'kdkyhu lafonk ds vk/kkj ij dke ij fy;k x;k FkkA foHkkx

}kjk eLVj jksy j[kk tkrk Fkk ftlesa mifLFkr gkus ij izkFkhZ dh mifLFkfr vafdr dh tkrh FkhA izR;sd ekg esa

Jfed }kjk fd;s x;s dk;Z fnolksa ds vuqlkj mldk Hkqxrku fd;k x;k gSA ftl vof/k esa izkFkhZx.k }kjk dk;Z ugh

fd;k x;k& ml le; ds eLVj jksy gksuk laHko ugha gSA izkFkhZx.k pawfd fu;fer deZpkjh ds :i esa fu;qDr ugha Fks&

blfy, is&fcy jftLVj esa mudk uke vafdr ugha gSA xsV&jftLVj fu;ekuqlkj ,d o"kZ ds fy, j[kk tkrk gS

mlds Ik'pkr u"V dj fn;k tkrk gS&ftldk i`Fkd ls vfHkys[k j[kk tkuk fu;e ds vuqlkj visf{kr ugha gSA

blfy, izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk ds dksbZ vk/kkj fo|eku ugha gSA

20-

foi{kh us l'kiFk dFku djrs gq, okafNr izys[kksa ds laca/k esa ;g dgk gS%

1- xsV&jftLVj 11 ls 14 o"kZ iqjkus gSa& tks ek= 1 o"kZ rd gh lqjf{kr j[ks tkrs gS blfy, izLrqr

ugha fd;s x;sA

2- osru okmplZ izkFkhZx.k ds laca/k esa la/kkfjr gh ugha fd;s x;s D;ksafd os fu;fer vk/kkj ij fu;qDr

ugha FksA Hkqxrku laca/kh izfof"V eLVj jksy ij dh xbZ gS& tks izLrqr fd;s x;s gaSA

3- cSad LVSVesaV izLrqr dj fn;s gSA

4- dk;Z vkoaVu jftLVj& izkFkhZx.k ds fu;fer vk/kkj ij fu;qDr u gksus rFkk izkFkhZx.k dks dksbZ

fof'k"V dk;Z u fn;s tkus ds dkj.k ;g jftLVj la/kkfjr ugha fd;s x;s& izkFkhZx.k dh lsok]

fufonk izLrqr djus ds vk/kkj ij yh xbZ& blfy, izLrqr ugha gq, gSA

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

395

5- deZpkfj;ks dh lwph dsoy fu;fer deZpkfj;kas dh j[kh tkrh gS& izkFkhZx.k ds fu;fer deZpkjh u

gksus ls& la/kkfjr ugha dh xbZ o izLrqr ugha gqbZA

6- dz; iaftdk dh] mifLFkfr@Hkqxrku ls lqlaxrrk u gksus ls izLrqr ugha fd;k x;k Fkk fdarq

izfrijh{kk esa izkFkhZ ds vkxzg ij izn'kZ MCY;w&17 ds :Ik esa iznf'kZr gqvk gSA foi{kh }kjk izn'kZ

vkj&7 ls vkj&11 rd eLVj jksy izLrqr fd;s x;s gS tks & izkFkhZ dh mifLFkfr ls lacaf/kr gSaA

bu eLVj jksy ds vfrfjDr foi{kh us izn'kZ vkj&5 o vkj&6 mifLFkfr i=d Hkh lk{; esa izLrqr

fd;s gS&ftuesa of.kZr mifLFkfr fooj.k izn'kZ W- 7] W- 10] W- 11] W- 12] W- 15] W- 16] ls

lekurk n'kkZrk gSA ;gh ugha izkFkhZ us vius izfrijh{kk esa izn'kZ vkj&5@3@ vuqyXud&3 esa

of.kZr fooj.k dks Lo;a ls lacaf/kr fooj.k gksuk] o lgh gksuk Lohdkj fd;k gSA

21-

izkFkhZ us vius lk{; esa ;g dgk gS fd mls dke djus dk iSlk pSd ls feyrk FkkA 06-02-2020 dks iqu%

fd;s x;s izfrijh{k.k esa mlus dgk gS fd izn'kZ vkj&7 ls vkj&11 rd eLVj jksy ds vk/kkj ij mls uxn Hkqxrku

gqvk gSA var esa ;g Hkh Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mlls ftrus fnu dke fy;k x;k& mldk Hkqxrku foi{kh us dj fn;k

gSA

22-

foi{kh lk{kh lfPpnkuaUn uk;d us ;|fi viuh izfrijh{kk esa dgk gS fd 2006 ds dksbZ eLVj jksy is'k ugha

fd;s gSaSA pSd ls Hkqxrku ds cSad LVsVesaV is'k fd;s gS tks izn'kZ vkj&13 gS fdarq izkFkhZ dks fd;s Hkqxrku dk mYys[k

blesa ugh gS D;ksafd 17-12-2006 ls cSad LVsVesaV is'k fd;k gSA fdarq cSad LVsVesaV o eLVj jksy iwjs izLrqr u gksus ij

Hkh izn'kZ vkj&5 o vkj&6 esa of.kZr mifLFkfr fooj.k dks izkFkhZx.k }kjk lgh gksuk Lohdkj dj ysus ds dkj.k foi{kh

dh ln~HkkfoDrk ij izfrdwy izHkko ugha iM+rk gSaA ;g mi/kkfjr djuk mfpr ugha gS fd foi{kh us izkFkhZx.k dh

okLrfod mifLFkfr dks Nqikus ds mn~s'; ls dksbZ izys[k izLrqr ugha fd;s gksaA D;ksafd izkFkhZx.k dh mifLFkfr laca/kh

fooj.k ftls izkFkhZ us lgh ekuk gS& vfHkys[k ij miyC/k gSaA

23-

vc izkFkhZ }kjk vius izfrijh{kk esa fd;s x;s dqN egRoiw.kZ dFkuksa ij Hkh blh lanHkZ esa fopkj djuk lqlaxr

gSA

izkFkhZ dgrk gS fd mls dksbZ fu;qfDr i= ugha feykA og Bsds dk vFkZ le>rk gSaSA ch- ,- ikl gSA izn'kZ

MCY;w& 3 dks izkFkhZ us Lo;a ds QksVks o gLrk{kj ;qDr gksuk Lohdkj fd;k gSA og ;g Hkh Lohdkj djrk gS fd mlus

izn'kZ MCY;w& 3 ds ek/;e ls Bsds ij dk;Z djus ds fy, vkosnu izLrqr fd;k gS& mlus o"kZ 2007 esa Hkh Bsds ij

dk;Z djus ds fy, vkosnu fd;k FkkA Bsds ij dk;Z djus ds fy, lHkh ls ¼izkFkhZx.k ls½ vyx& vyx gLrk{kj

djok;s tkrs Fks& tks dke djrs Fks& mldk iSlk fey tkrk FkkA izkFkhZ ds bu dFkuks dks izn'kZ vkj&4 o vkj&5

vkns'k ls iqf"V feyrh gS ftlesa izkFkhZ dks DoksVs'kuksa ds vk/kkj ij nks ekg dh vof/k gsrq 6000@& #- esa dk;Z

djokus dh Lohd`fr tkjh dh xbZ gSA ;g Lohd`fr izkFkhZ ds izkFkZuki= izn'kZ vkj&3 ds vk/kkj ij gS ftlesa izkFkhZ us

dke Bsds ij 6000@& #- esa djus dh lgefr nh o ifjopu fd;k gSA

24-

izkFkhZ ds i{k esa izn'kZ W- 5 }kjk vDrwoj 2006 esa fd;s x;s Bsds ds dk;Z gsrq 1550@& #- Lohd`r fd;s

tkus dk mYys[k gSA blls ;g vkHkkl feyrk gS fd izn'kZ R- 5@1 ls izn'kZ R- 6@5 rd Lohd`r mifLFkfr fooj.k

esa ftl vof/k esa izkFkhZx.k dks dk;Zjr ugha gksuk n'kkZ;k x;k gS& ml vof/k esas izkFkhZx.k us Bsds ij O;fDrxr :Ik ls

le;c} o mn~s'; iwfrZ rd fuf'pr /kujkf'k ij dk;Z fd;k gSA

25-

lk{; dh bl fLFkfr rFkk izkFkhZi{k dh LohdkjksfDr ds vfLrRo esa izkFkhZx.k dh foi{kh }kjk fdlh in ij

fu;qfDr fd;k tkuk izekf.kr ugha gksrk& oju ;g izekf.kr gksrk gS fd izkFkhZx.k us foi{kh ds fy, uewuksa ds inkFkZ dh

dVkbZ] filkbZ] lQkbZ] iSfdax] vkfn dk;Z dks Bsds ij djus ds fy, fuf'pr dk;Z laiknu] fuf'pr vof/k esa]& fu;r

/kujkf'k gsrq djus dh lgefr o Lohd`fr nh gSA Bsds ij dk;Z laiknu ds mijkar tuojh 2007 ls vizsy 2008 dh

vof/k esa izkFkhZx.k us fofHkUu efguksa esa izn'kZ R- 5 o R- 6 esa fn;s x;s fooj.k ds vuq:Ik mifLFkr jgdj dk;Z Hkh

fd;kA lk{; ds bl foospu ls vizkFkhZ o izkFkhZx.k ds e/; fu;kstd o deZdkj dk laca/k LFkkfir gksuk izekf.kr ugha

gksrk gSA

26-

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls fu.kZ; fd'ku flag cuke ,Dth- bathfu;j esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g vf/ker fn;k

gS fd tc nSfud osru Hkksxh dks fu;fer in ds fo:} fu;qDr fd;k gks& rks lsok lekfIr ds iwoZ vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk

25 ¼,Q½s ds izko/kkuksa dk vuqikyu vko';d gSa

27-

Mk;jsDVj fQ'kjht VfeZuy fMohtu cuke Hkhdw HkkbZ es?kkth HkkbZ pkoM+k ds fu.kZ; esa eku- mPpre

U;k;ky; us ;g ekxZn'kZu fn;k gS fd /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½s vf/kfu;e ds lanHkZ esa 240 fnu dh yxkrkj lsok izekf.kr djus

gsrq ,d nSfud osru Hkksxh ls leLr mifLFkfr vfHkys[k izLrqr djus dh vis{kk mfpr ugha gSA deZdkj us tc ;g

nkok fd;k gks fd mlus 240 fnu dk;Z fd;k gS rks& fu;kstd ij ;g flf}Hkkj varfjr gks tkrk gS fd og deZdkj

}kjk 240 fnu lsok iw.kZ u djuk izekf.kr djsA

28-

gLrxr izdj.kksa esa izkFkhZx.k }kjk Bsds ij dk;Z djuk o foi{kh }kjk izLrqr mifLFkfr fooj.k dks Lohdkj

dj ysus dh fLFkfr esa bu fu.kZ;ksa esa izfrikfnr fof/k rF;kRed fHkUurk ds dkj.k izkFkhZx.k ds izfr lgk;d ugha gSA

396 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

29-

vkj- ,e- ;sykrh cuke vfl- ,DthD;wfVo bathfu;j ds fu.kZ; esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g izfrikfnr

fd;k gS fd 240 fnu lrr lsok djus ds rF; dks izekf.kr djus dk izkFkfed flf}Hkkj oknh@ izkFkhZ ij gh gS& ;g

nkf;Ro oknh }kjk Lohdk;Z lk{; ¼ekSf[kd o izys[kh;½ izLrqr djds mUeksfpr fd;k tkrk gSA nSfud osru Hkksxh

Jfed ;fn fu;kstd ls mifLFkfr o osru Hkqxrku dk vfHkys[k izLrqr djokus dk fuosnu djsa& vkSj fu;kstd izLrqr

u djs& rks fu;kstd ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk djus dk fofu'p; izR;sd ekeys ds rF;ksa ij fuHkZj gksxkA gLrxr

izdj.kksa dh mi;qZDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds izdk'k esa foi{kh ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk fd;s tkus dk dksbZ vk/kkj fo|eku

ugha gSA rFkk ;g fu.kZ;t fof/k izkFkhZ ds i{k esa lgk;d ugha gSA

30-

fizalhiy Mwaxj dkWayst chdkusj cuke vkseizdk'k esa eku- jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us dgk gS fd deZdkj

tc 240 fnu dh yxkrkj lsok ,d dsys.Mj o"kZ esa iwoZ djus dk nkok djsa ,oa fu;kstd us bl rF; dk okXNy&

iw.kZ [kaMu fd;k gks& rks mls fu;kstd dh Lohd`fr le>k tkosaA

31-

ch- Mh- vks- izkxiqj cuke ;ksfxaUnj dqekj o vU; esa eku- fgekpy izns'k mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fof/k Hkh

rF;kRed fHkUurk ds dkj.k izkFkhZx.k ds izfr lgk;d ugha gSA

32-

blds foijhr foi{kh dh vksj ls ,e- ih- bysfDVªflVh cksMZ cuke gfjjke o lqjsUnz uxj fMfLVªDV iapk;r

cuke Mk;k HkkbZ vejflag ds ekeysa esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vf/ker dk voyEc fy;k x;k gSA bl

fu.kZ; esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd lsok lekfIr ds iwoZorhZ ,d dsys.Mj o"kZ esa 240 fnu

yxkrkj dk;Z djus ds rF; dk flf}Hkkj deZdkj ij gh gSA tc deZdkj bl rF; dks izekf.kr djus gsrq dksbZ lk{;

izLrqr u djs rFkk fu;kstd }kjk eLVj jksy izLrqr djus ij mudk [ka.Mu Hkh u djs& rks ;g dgk tkuk pkfg;s fd

deZdkj us flf}Hkkj dk mUekspu ugha fd;k gSA U;k;ky; dks fu;kstd ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk rc gh djuk

pkfg;s tc okafNr lk{; dk vfLrRo esa gksuk deZdkj izekf.kr djs] ftls izLrqr fd;k tk ldrk gksA Je U;k;ky;

ds le{k tkWp dk ifj{ks= lsok lekfIr ds iwoZorhZ 12 eghuksa rd gh lhfer gS& blh vof/k dks ijhf{kr dj og

fu/kkZfjr djsxk fd deZdkj dks vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ dk laj{k.k ns; gS vFkok ughaA bu fu.kZ;ksa esa ikfjr fof/k

ls ;g Li"V ekxZn'kZu izkIr gksrk gS fd izkFkhZx.k }kjk xsV jftLVj ds izLrqrhdj.k dh ekWx djus ij mlds u"V gks

tkus dk l'kiFk dFku vizkFkhZ }kjk fd;k x;k gS] blfy, ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk gS fd vizkFkhZ us fdlh izys[k ds

vfLrRo esa gksrs gq, Hkh tkuow> dj] izyf{kr mn~s'; ls mls izLrqr ugha fd;k gksA blds vfrfjDr ;g Hkh egRoiw.kZ gS

fd vizkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr mifLFkfr& fooj.k izn'kZ vkj& 5@1 ls vkj& 6@5 o eLVj jksy izn'kZ vkj& 7 ls vkj&

11 rd dks izkFkhZx.k us Lohdkj djrs gq, fo[kafMr ugha fd;k gSA blfy, vizkFkhZ ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk fd;k

tkuk U;k;ksfpr o fof/klEer ugha gSA

33-

foi{kh us ,e- ih- bysfDVªflVh cksMZ cuke gfjjke ds fu.kZ; esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fof/k dk

voyac ysdj ;g Hkh dgk gS fd izkFkhZx.k dk dk;Z vLFkkbZ o vko';drk tfur Fkk& ftls vko';drk u gksus ij

can Hkh fd;k x;k FkkA bl rF; dh iqf"V lk{kh fouksn dqekj lh- ds- ds dFkuksa ls gqbZ gSaA bl fu.kZ; esa eku-

mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g ekxZn'kZu fn;k gS fd lhfer dk;Z ds fy, LFkkuh; O;fDr;ksa dks fn;k x;k fu;kstu& lrr

o fu;fer dk;Z gsrq ugha le>k tk ldrk gSA tc eLVj jksy ls Hkh ;g izdV gks fd fu;fer varjky ij Jfed ls

dk;Z fy;k x;k gS] ;g izekf.kr ugha gksrk gS fd fu;kstd dks ml dk;Z dh lrr vko';drk jgh gksA vizkFkhZ }kjk

izLrqr mifLFkfr fooj.k o eLVj jksy ds voyksdu ls Hkh izkFkhZx.k ls djok;k x;k dk;Z lrr izd`fr dk izekf.kr

ugha gqvk gS& D;ksafd mifLFkfr fooj.k esa izR;sd ekg esa fy;k x;k dk;Z] varjky lfgr gSA

34-

izkFkhZx.k dk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k ls Bsdk& Jfed ds :Ik esa dk;Z ;fn fy;k x;k gS rks vizkFkhZ ds

ikl mDr mn~s'; gsrq vuqKki= gksuk vko';d Fkk& ftldk u gksuk vizkFkhZ us Lohdkj fd;k gS& blfy, izkFkhZx.k

dks vizkFkhZ }kjk fu;qDr gh ekuk tkosaA foi{kh us bl laca/k esa fdlh vuqKki= dh vko';drk u gksuk dg dj rdZ

dk fojks/k fd;k gSA rdZ ij fopkj fd;k x;kA

35-

Bsdk Jfed ¼fofu;eu ,oa mUewyu½ vf/kfu;e 1970 dh /kkjk 1 ds vUrZxr vf/kfu;e ds izko/kkuksa ds

foLrkj dk mica/k fd;k x;k gSA bl vf/kfu;e dh mi/kkjk 1 ¼4½ (a) ds vuqlkj izR;sd ,slk LFkkiu@laLFkku tgkW

chl ;k mlls vf/kd deZdkj fu;ksftr gksa ;k foxr ckjg eghuksa ds nkSjku fdlh fnu fu;ksftr jgs gks& ij gh

vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku iz;ksT; gksxsaA bu izdj.kksa esa izkFkhZx.k us ,slh dksbZ lk{; izLrqr ugha dh gS ftlls vizkFkhZ ds

v/khu chl ;k mlls vf/kd deZdkjksa dk fu;ksftr gksuk izekf.kr gksrk gksA blfy, izkFkhZx.k dk ;g rdZ lkjoku

ugha gSA

36-

mi;ZqDr foospu ls ;g Li"V :Ik ls izekf.kr gS fd izkFkhZx.k lsok lekfIr dh frfFk 29-04-2008 ls iwoZorhZ

,d dsys.Mj o"kZ dh vof/k esa vizkFkhZ ds fu;kstu esa 240 fnu yxkrkj dk;Z djus dk rF; izekf.kr djus esa foQy

jgs gSa& blfy, vizkFkhZ }kjk izkFkhZx.k dh NVuh 30-04-2008 ls fd;k tkuk Hkh Lo;a gh izekf.kr ugha gksrk gSA

ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa ds varxZr fdlh izdkj dk laj{k.k izkIr djus ds

vf/kdkjh izekf.kr ugha gq, gSA vr% ;g fopkj.kh; fcanq izkFkhZx.k ds fo:} fu.khZr fd;k tkrk gSA

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

397

37-

foi{kh us ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mUgksaus izkFkhZx.k dks vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa ds varxZr

dksbZ uksfVl ugha fn;k u gh uksfVl osru o {kfriwfrZ dk Hkqxrku fd;k& D;ksafd uksfVl LFkkbZ deZpkfj;ksa dks fn;k

tkrk gS rFkk izkFkhZx.k Lo;a gh dke NksM+ dj pys tkrs FksA fcanq la- 2 ds fofu'p; ds izdk'k esa izkFkhZx.k dks pawfd

vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa dk laj{k.k izkIr ugha gqvk gS] blfy, bu izko/kkuks dh ikyuk fd;s tkus

dh ck/;rk vizkFkhZ dks ugha Fkh& vr% ;g fcanq izkFkhZx.k ds fo:} fu.khZr fd;k tkrk gSA

38-

bl fcanq ds laca/k esa izkFkhZ us vius dFku esa dgk gS fd vizkFkhZ }kjk dksbZ ofj"Brk lwph ugh cukbZ og tks

dk;Z djrk Fkk& mls vU; Jfeadks ls djok;k tk jgk gSA ;g mYys[kuh; gS fd izkFkhZ us vius vfHkopukas ;k lk{;

esa mu O;fDr;ksa dk uke Hkh of.kZr ugha fd;k gS ftUgsa izkFkhZ dks lsokeqDr djus ds mijkar dfu"B gksus ij Hkh lsok esa

j[kk x;k gksA

39-

foi{kh us vius lk{; esa dgk gS fd izkFkhZ ds dk;Z NksM+dj pys tkus ds okn mDr dk;Z dh lekfIr ij

fdlh vU; Jfed dks dk;Z ij ugha yxk;k x;k gS rFkk fdlh dfu"B Jfed dks fu;qfDr ugha nh xbZ gSA izfrijh{kk

esa ;g Hkh dgk gS fd orZeku esa Bsds ij tks Jfed dk;Zjr gS os ml dk;Z ls layXu ugha gS ftl ij izkFkhZ dk;Zjr

jgk gSA orZeku Jfedksa dh dk;Z dh izd`fr orZeku deZpkjh ls fHkUu gSaA

40-

izkFkhZ dh izfr ijh{kk esa mlus Lohdkj fd;k gS fd izn'kZ vkj& 12 lwph esa mldk uke ugha gS D;ksafd og

LFkkbZ deZpkfj;ksa dh lwph gSA foi{kh dk ;g Hkh lk{; gS fd pWwfd izkFkhZ fu;fer deZpkjh ugha Fkk blfy, is fcy

jftLVj esa mldk uke ugha gSA izkFkhZ dk uke rks eLVj jksy esa gh vafdr gksrk FkkA

41-

fcanq la- 2 ds fofu'p; ls ;g LFkkfir gks pqdk gS fd vizkFkhZ }kjk izkFkhZx.k dks fdlh LFkkbZ ;k fu;fer

in ij fu;qfDr ugha nh xbZ Fkh& oju izkFkhZx.k dks dk;Z dh vko';drk gsrq vLFkkbZ :Ik ls lafonk ds vk/kkj ij

fuf'pr jkf'k ds Hkqxrku ij j[kk FkkA ,sls Jfedksa dh dksbZ ofj"Brk lwph dk la/kkj.k fd;k tkuk foi{kh ds fy,

ck/;dkjh ugha gSA

42-

eku- mPpre U;k;ky; us lqjsUnz uxj fMfLVªDV iapk;r cuke Mk;k HkkbZ vejflag ds fu.kZ; esa leku rF;ksa

ij fopkj djrs gq, ;g dgk gS fd fu;fer fu;kstu ds vHkko esa ofj"Brk lwph dk la/kkj.k fu;kstd ls visf{kr ugha

Fkk& nSfud osru Hkksxh Jfedksa dh ofj"Brk lwph dk la/kkj.k fof/kd vis{kk ugha gSA bl foospu ds mijkar ;g fcanq

izkFkhZ ds fo:} fu.khZr fd;k tkrk gSA

fopkj.kh; fcanqvksa ij izkIr foosfpr fu"d"kZ ds vk/kkj ij vizkFkhZ laLFkku ;|fi m|ksx dh ifjHkk"kk ds

vUrxZr vkuk izekf.kr gqvk gS fdarq lk{; ds v/kkj ij vizkFkhZ }kjk izkFkhZx.k dh NVuh fd;k tkuk izekf.kr ugh

gqvk gS& blfy, vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa dk laj{k.k izkFkhZx.k dks miyC/k ugha gSA vizkFkhZ }kjk

izkFkhZ ls fdlh dfu"Brj O;fDr dks lsok esa j[kk tkuk fl) ugha gqvk gS&bl izdkj izkFkhZx.k vf/kfu;e ds varxZr

fdlh Hkh izko/kku dk laj{k.k ikus dks vf/kdkjoku izekf.kr ugha gq, gSA blfy, izkFkhZx.k vizkFkhZ ds fo:} dksbZ

vuqrks"k ikus ds vf/kdkjh ugha gSA

vr% izkFkhZx.k& vizkFkhZ laLFkku ds fo:} dksbZ vuqrks"k izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh ugha gSa& vf/kfu.kZ; blh

izdkj ikfjr fd;k tkrk gSA vf/kfu.kZ; dh izfr izR;sd vkS|ksfxd fookn i=koyh esa layXu dh tkos rFkk iapkV dh

izfrfyfi vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 dh /kkjk 17 ¼1½ ds vuqlj.k esa izdk'kukFkZ izsf"kr dh tkosaA

iapkV vkt fnukad 29 fnlEcj 2020 dks fy[kk o gLrk{kfjr fd;k x;kA

jk/kk eksgu prqosZnh] ihBklhu vf/kdkjh

नई दिल् ली, 3 फरवरी, 2021

का.आ. 152

—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्री

सरकार ijek.kq [kkfut vUos"k.k ,oa vuqla/kku funs'kky; , if'pe {ks=] ijek.kq mtkZ foHkkx] ि ृुर (राि) के

प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री िन्ना लाल,कामगार के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्ििष्ट औद्योजगक जववाि में केन्री

सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण- सि- श्रम न् ा ाल , ि ृुर के ृंचाट (संिभि सं्‍ ा 25/2011) को िजसा दक

अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज, प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्री सरकार को 03.02.2021 को प्राप्त हुआ ा।

[सं. एल-14012/3/2009-आईआर (डी ू)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

398 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 3rd February, 2021

S.O. 152.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 25/2011) of the Central Government Industrial-Tribunal-cum

Labour Court Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

The Atomic Mineral Directorate for Exploration and Research, Department of Atomic Energy, Jaipur (raj) and

Shri Dhanna Lal, Worker which was received by the Central Government on 03.02.2021.

[No. L-14012/3/2009 IR (DU)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

jk/kk eksgu prqosZnh

ihBklhu vf/kdkjh

lh-th-vkbZ-Vh- izdj.k la- 25@2011 Reference No. L-14012/3/2009-IR(DU) Dated:13.7.2011

Jh /kUuk yky iq= Jh txnh’k cSjok fuoklh 34@22] lsDVj&3] izrki uxj] lkaxkusj] t;iqjA

ijek.kq [kkfut vUos"k.k ,oa vuqla/kku funs'kky; if'pe {ks=]

ijek.kq mtkZ foHkkx] Hkkjr ljdkj ,- ,e- Mh- dEiysDl- lsDVj&5]

foLrkj izrki uxj lkaxkusj] t;iqj& }kjk funs'kd

---vizkFkhZ@foi{kh

izkFkhZx.k dh rjQ ls % Jh dq.kky jkor vf/koDrk

vizkFkhZx.k dh rjQ ls % Jh nsos'k dqekj caly vf/koDrk

fnukad % 29-12-2020

1-

Je ,oa fu;kstu ea=ky; Hkkjr ljdkj ubZ fnYyh }kjk fnukad 13-07-2011 dks vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e

1947 ¼ftls vkxs ek= vf/kfu;e dgk tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 10 ¼1½ ¼Mh½ ds vUrxZr iznRr 'kfDr;ks ds vuqlj.k esa

mi;qZDr ikaWapksa izkFkhZx.k ds laEc/k esa fuEukafdr ¼lesfdr :i esa½ fookn U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq bl vf/kdj.k dks lanfHkZr

fd;s x;s %&

“Whether the action of the Management of Atomic Mineral Directorate for Exploration and Research,

Department of Atomic Energy, Jaipur in terminating the services of (1) Sh. Shri Ram Sharma s/o

Shri Lallu Lal Sharma, (2) Shri Dhanna Lal s/o Shri Jagdish Bairwa, (3) Shri Rakesh Kumar Upadhyay

s/o Shri Hari Kishan Sharma, (4) Shri Chhagan Lal Dhanka s/o Shri Gulab Chand Dhanka and (5)

Shri Manoj Kumar Pipliwal s/o Shri kanhaiya Lal Pipliwal. w.e.f. 30.04.2008 is legal and justified?

What relief the workmen are entitled to? ’’

2-

mi;qZDr ikWapksa fookn bl vf/kdj.k dks izkIr gksus ij mHk;i{k dks vkgwr djrs gq,& izkFkhZx.k dks funsZ'k

fn;k x;k fd os vius nkos dk vfHkdFku izLrqr djasA rnqijkar izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls fnukad 04-10-2011 dks nkos ds

vfHkdFku izLrqr fd;s x;sA izkFkhZx.k ds dFku la{ksi esa bl izdkj of.kZr gSaA izkFkhZx.k dks 05-07-2005 ls 10-01-2006

ds e/; fofHkUu frfFk;ksa ij prqFkZ Js.kh ¼gsYij rduhdh lgk;d½ ds in ij vizkFkhZ }kjk fu;qDr fd;k x;kA

izkFkhZx.k iRFkj ds uewuksa dh filkbZ] NukbZ] f?klkbZ o vU; dk;kZy;h dk;Z vizkFkhZ ds vf/kdkfj;kas ds fn'kk funsZ'k ij

djrs FksA vizkFkhZ laLFkku m|ksx dh ifjHkk"kk esa vkrk gSaA izkFkhZx.k dks vizkFkhZ us fnukad 30-04-2008 dks voS/k :Ik ls

lsok eqDr dj fn;kA

3-

izkFkhZx.k o vizkFkhZ ds e/; fu;kstd&deZdkj ds laca/k FksA izkFkhZx.k dh lsok eqfDr ls iwoZ /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½

vf/kfu;e ds vuqlkj uksfVl@uksfVl osru o {kfriwfrZ jkf'k dk Hkqxrku izkFkhZx.k dks ugha fd;k x;kA izkFkhZx.k ls tks

dk;Z djok;k tk jgk Fkk og LFkkbZ izd`fr dk Fkk o vkt Hkh vU; Jfedkas ls djok;k tk jgk gSA izkFkhZx.k us 240

fnu ls vf/kd fnuksa rd yxkrkj dk;Z fd;k gSA vizkFkhZ us Jfedksa dh ofj"Brk lwph ugha cukbZ u gh dksbZ ?kjsyw

tkWap dh& rFkk vuqfpr Je O;ogkj fd;kA bl izdkj /kkjk 25] ¼,Q½@ ¼th½@ ¼,p½ vf/kfu;e o fu;e 77 o 78

ds izko/kkuks dk mYya?ku fd;k gSA izkFkhZx.k lsok eqfDr ds Ik'pkr ls csjkstxkj gaSA vr% fnukad 30-04-2008 dks dh

xbZ izkFkhZx.k dh lsok lekfIr dks voS| ?kksf"kr djrs gq, izkFkhZx.k dks foxr osru o ifjykHkksa lfgr lsok esa cgky

fd;k tkosA

4-

vizkFkhZ@foi{kh us fnukad 04-07-2012 dks ikWapks izdj.kksa esa oknksÙkj izLrqr djrs gq, ;g dgk gSa fd izkFkhZx.k

dks fdlh in ij fu;qfDr ugha nh xbZ] cfYd vko';d dk;Z djus ds fy, vkdfLed Jfed ds :Ik esa va'kdkyhu

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

399

lafonk ds vk/kkj ij j[kk x;k FkkA blfy, lsok eqfDr dk iz'u gh mRiUu ugha gksrk gSA vizkFkhZ m|ksx dh Js.kh esa

ugha vkrk gSA izkFkhZx.k dks dk;Z miyC/krk ij tkjh fufonk o fu/kkZfjr ctV esa dk;Z lEiUu djus gsrq j[kk tkus ls

,slh fu;qfDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2 ¼vks vks½s ¼ch ch½ ds vUrZxr vkrh gS o /kkjk 25&,Q ds izko/kku vkd`"V gh ughs

gksrs gSaA izkFkhZx.k ,d o"kZ esa 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z djuk izekf.kr ugha dj ik;s gSaA vizkFkhZ }kjk vf/kfu;e o

fu;eksa dh vogsyuk ugha dh xbZ gS u gh dksbZ vuqfpr Je vH;kl fd;k x;k gSaA fdlh vU; Jfed dks dk;Z gsrq

ugha yxk;k x;k gSA vr% okn vLohdkj fd;s tkosaA

5-

izkFkhZx.k us 24-09-2012 dks oknksRrj dk [kaMu djrs gq, vfrfjDr dFku Hkh izLrqr fd;s gSa&vkSj iqu% nkos

ds vfHkdFkuksa dks Lohdkj djus dk fuosnu fd;k gSaA

6-

mi;qZDr ikWapksa fookn izdj.kksa esa izkFkhZx.k ds vfHkdFku o oknksRrj leku gSa rFkk izkFkhZx.k dh lsok dh

izd`fr o lsok lekfIr dh frfFk Hkh leku gh gSaA blfy, bu ikWapksa fooknks esa mRiUu fooknfcanq leku gksus ls bu

fooknksa dk vf/kfu.kZ;u ,dhd`r :Ik ls mHk;i{k dh lgefr ls fd;k tk jgk gSaA

7-

izkFkhZx.k us vius vius nkos ds vfHkdFku ds leZFku gsrq lk{; esa Lo;a izkFkhZ ,- M-& 1 Jh jke 'ekZ]

Jh /kUuk yky] Jh jkds'k dqekj mik/;k;] Jh Nxu yky /kkudk ,oa Jh eukst dqekj ihiyhoky dks ijhf{kr fd;k

gSA izys[kh; lk{; esa izn'kZ 1 ls 17 rd izys[kkas dks Jh jke 'kekZ ls lacaf/kr izdj.k esa iznf'kZr fd;k gSA pwafd bu

ikWapksa gh izdj.kksa esa okndkj.k] i{kdkj o lk{; dh izd`fr leku gS& mHk;i{k dh lgefr ls fookn la- 24@2011

Jh jke 'kekZ cuke funs'kd] ijek.kq [kkfut vUos"k.k ,oa vuqla/kku esa mHk;i{k }kjk izLrqr lk{; dks gh ikWapksa fooknks

ds laca/k esa izHkkoh ekudj foospu gsrq xzg.k fd;k tk jgk gSA

blh Øe esa foi{kh@vizkFkhZ us vius lk{; esa ,u- ,- M- 1 fouksn dqekj lh- ds- ¼lgk- dkfeZd vf/kdkjh½ dks ijh{kr

fd;k o izn'kZ vkj&1 ls vkj&6 izys[kksa dks iznf'kZr fd;k gSA

8-

fnukad 22-12-2017 dks bl vf/kdj.k }kjk ikWapksa fooknksa esa vf/kfu.kZ; ikfjr dj izkFkhZx.k dks dksbZ vuqrks"k

ikus dk vf/kdkjh ugha ekurs gq, nkoksa dks fujLr dj fn;k x;kA bl vf/kfu.kZ; ds fo:} izkFkhZx.k us eku- mPp

U;k;ky; esa fjV ;kfpdk izLrqr dhA eku- jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us fnukad 28-08-2019 dks fu.kZ; ikfjr djrs gq,

fjV ;kfpdk Lohdkj dj vf/kfu.kZ; fnukad 22-12-2017 dks vikLr dj fn;k rFkk ekeys bl vf/kdj.k dks iqu%

fofuf'pr djus gsrq izfrizsf"kr dj fn;sA eku- mPp U;k;ky; es ;g funsZ'k fn;k fd izkFkhZx.k }kjk ,usDlj&1

¼izkFkZuki= fnukad 27-11-2012½ ds ek/;e ls visf{kr izys[kksa dk]s tks foi{kh ds ikl miyC/k gS Je U;k;ky; ds le{k

izLrqr fd;k tkosa&rFkk izkFkhZx.k dks bu vfHkys[kksa dks ijhf{kr djus rFkk vius i{k dks LFkkfir djus dk leqfpr

volj fn;k tkosA

bl fu.kZ; ds vuqlj.k esa foi{kh dks izys[kksa ds izLrqrhdj.k dk funsZ'k fn;k x;k rFkk izLrqfrdj.k ds

mijkUr mHk;i{k dks vfrfjDr lk{; izLrqr djus dk volj Hkh fn;k x;kA izkFkhZ us vius lk{; esa iqu% ,- M- 1

Jh jke 'kekZ dks ijhf{kr fd;k rFkk vfrfjDr izys[kh lk{; esa izn'kZ W 17 iznf'kZr fd;kA foi{kh@vizkFkhZ us

vfrfjDr lk{; esa ,u- ,- M- 2 lfPpnkuaUn uk;d mi{ks=h; funs'kd o ,u- ,- M- 3 y[ku yky 'kekZ dks ijhf{kr

fd;k o izys[kh; lk{; esa izn'kZ vkj 7 ls vkj 13 rd izys[k iznf'kZr fd;sA

9-

fnukad 03-11-2020 ls 09-12-2020 rd fofHkUu frfFk;ksa ij mHk;i{k ds rdZ&forZd lqus x;s o miyC/k lk{;

dk ifj'khyu fd;k x;kA

10-

izkFkhZx.k ds vfHkHkk"kd dk ;g izeq[k rdZ gS fd ,usDlj&1 izkFkZuki= fnukad 27-11-2012 esa of.kZr o okafNr

izys[kksa dks vizkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr gh ugha fd;k x;k gS & u gh izLrqr u djus dk djus dk dksbZ larqf"Vizn dkj.k

izLrqr fd;k gSA blfy, vizkFkhZ ds fo:} ;g izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk dh tkos fd ;fn og izkfFkZr vfHkys[kksa dks izLrqr

djrs rks izkFkhZx.k dk foi{kh ds v/khu fu;fer 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Zjr jgus dk rF; izekf.kr gks tkrkA vizkFkhZ

us vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼Mh½ dh ikyuk u djrs gq, mifLFkfr dk dksbZ vfHkys[k la/kkfjr ugha fd;kA tks izys[k

foi{kh us u"V gks tkus ds dkj.k izLrqr ugha dj ikuk dgk gS muds u"V djus laca/kh dksbZ lk{; izLrqr gh ugha dh

gSaA lk{kh Jhjke 'kekZ ds iwoZorhZ 'kiFki= esa fu;qfDr frfFk 06-07-2005 =qfV o'k vafdr gks xbZ gS ftls 06-07-2006 gh

i<+k tkos tks Ik'pkrorhZ vfrfjDr lk{; 'kiFki= esa vfdr gSA vfHkys[kksa dks u"V djus dk dksbZ izek.k gh ugha gSA

foi{kh lk{kh y[ku yky Lohdkj djrk gS fd xsV jftLVj esa izfof"V fd;s fcuk dksbZ vUnj ugh tk ldrk gSA fdarq

ogh xsV jftLVj foi{kh us is'k ugh fd;k gSA Bsdsnkj }kjk fu;qfDr dk rdZ foi{kh us fn;k gS fdarq Bsdsnkj dk dksbZ

ykbZlsal izLrqr gh ugh fd;k gSaA vr% izkFkhZx.k ds nkoksa dks Lohdkj dj izkfFkZr vuqrks"k iznku fd;k tkosA mUgksaus

vius rdksZ ds leZFku esa fuEukafdr U;kf;d n`"Vkar izLrqr fd;s%

1- cSaxyksj okVj lIykbZ ,aM lhojst cksMZ cuke vkj- jktIik o vU; 1978 ,- vkbZ- vkj- 548

2- fd'ku flag cuke ,fDtfDVo bath- gfj;k.kk LVsV ,xzh- ekdsZfVax cksMZ ,- vkbZ- vkj- 2010 lq- dksVZ] ¼lIyh-½

787

3- Mk;jsDVj fQ'kjht VfeZuy fMohtu cuke Hkhdw HkkbZ es?kkth HkkbZ pkoM+k ,- vkbZ- vkj- 2010 lq- dksVZ] 1236

4- vkj- ,e- ;sykrh cuke vfl- ,DthD;wfVo bathfu;j flfoy vihy la- 5124@2004 fu.kZ;& 07-11-2005-

400 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

5- esfduksu eSadth fy- cuke esfduksu ,EiykbZt ;wfu;u flfoy vihy la- 5319@2008 lq- dksVZ] fu.kZ;&

25-02-2015-

6- fizalhiy Mwaxj dkWayst chdkusj cuke vkseizdk'k 1999 ysc- vkbZ- lh- 97 ¼jktLFkku½

7- ch- Mh- vks- izkxiqj cuke ;ksfxaUnj dqekj 2008 ¼118½ ,Q- ,y- vkj- 460 ¼fg- izns'k½

11-

vizkFkhZ ds vfHkHkk"kd dk ;g izeq[k rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k us vius iq"V lk{; ls ;g izekf.kr gh ugha fd;k gS

fd mUgksaus vizkFkhZ ds v/khu 240 fnu ls vf/kd&,d o"kZ dh vof/k esa dk;Z fd;k tcfd ;g fl}hHkkj izkFkhZx.k ij

gh vkjksfir gSA izkFkhZ Jhjke 'kekZ ¼o vU; izkFkhZx.k½ us Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mUgsa dksbZ fu;qfDr i= ugha feyk gS u gh

dksbZ vkosnu fu;qfDr gsrq fn;kA o"kZ 2005 ls 2008 rd ,d o"kZ esa fdrus fdrus fnu dk;Z fd;k ;g Hkh ;kn ugha

gSA izn'kZ W- 3 o W- 7 dk mYys[k djrs gq, mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ us Bsds ij dk;Z djus gsrq vkosnu fd;k

gSA izkFkhZx.k us ;g Hkh Lohdkj fd;k gS fd vuqyXud&3 ¼Ex. R/5½ mlls lacaf/kr gS rFkk blesa vfdar dk;Z fnol

lgh gS izn'kZ W- 10 ls W- 12 mlds Hkqxrku ls lacaf/kr gSA LohdkjksfDr ds mijkaUr fdlh izek.k dh vko';drk

'ks"k ugha jgrh gSA lk{; dh bl fLFkfr esa izkFkhZx.k dk ;g vk{ksi Lohdk;Z ugha gSa fd vizkFkhZ us mifLFkfr vfHkys[k

dk la/kkj.k ugha fd;k vFkok izLrqr ugha fd;k gSaS blfy, vizkFkhZ ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk dk dksbZ vk/kkj ugha

gSA izkFkhZ dks lafonk ds vk/kkj ij dk;Z djus gsrq fu;r mn~s'; ls j[kk x;k Fkk blfy, Hkh os vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25

¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa dk laj{k.k ugh ik ldrs gaSA vizkFkhZ vUos"k.k ,oa vuqla/kku ds dk;Z ls lac} gS tks m|ksx dh

ifjHkk"kk esa ugha vkrk gSA vr% okn vLohdkj fd;s tkosaA mUgksus vius rdZ ds leZFku esa fuEukafdr U;kf;d n`"Vkar

o vfHkys[k la/kkj.k vof/k dh foHkkxh; rkfydk dh izfr izLrqr dh gS%

1- lqjsUnz uxj fMfLVªDV iapk;r cuke Mk;k HkkbZ vejflag flfoy vihy la- 6511@2005 fu.kZ; 25-10-2005

¼lqizhe dksVZ½A

2- ,e- ih- bysfDVªflVh cksMZ cuke gfjjke flfoy vihy la- 2240@2001 fu.kZ; 27-09-2004 ¼lqizhe dksVZ½A

3- LVsV vkWaQ xqtjkr cuke izre flag ujflag ijekj ¼2001½ 9 lqizhe dksVZ dslst 713A

12-

mHk;i{k ds rdksZ] lk{; ,oa U;kf;d n`"Vkarks esa ikfjr fof/k ij lE;d fopkj djus ds mijkaUr bu fooknksa esa

fuEukafdr fookn fcanq& U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq mRiUu gq, gSa%

1- D;k vizkFkhZ@foi{kh] vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2 ¼j½ ds vFkkZUrxZr m|ksx gS\

---izkFkhZx.k

2- D;k izkFkhZx.k dks vizkFkhZ }kjk prqFkZ Js.kh ¼gsYij rduhdh lgk;d½ ds in ij tqykbZ 2005 ls tqykbZ 2006

ds e/; fu;qDr fd;k x;k rFkk izkFkhZx.k us vizkFkhZ ds v/khu 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z ,d dsys.Mj& o"kZ esa

fd;k gS\

---izkFkhZx.k

3- D;k foi{kh }kjk izkFkhZx.k dh lsok lekfIr ds iwoZ vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkukas dk vuqikyu

ugha fd;k x;k\

---izkFkhZx.k

4- D;k foi{kh }kjk deZdkjksa dh ofj"Brk lwph ugha cukbZ xbZ ,oa izkFkhZx.k dh lsok lekIr djus ds mijkaUr

izkFkhZx.k ls dfu"Brj O;fDr;ksa dks lsok esa j[kk x;k\

---izkFkhZx.k

5- vuqrks"k\

mHk;i{k ds rdksZ lk{; ,oa fof/k ij fopkj ds mijkaUr izR;sd fopkj.kh; fcUnq ij fofu'p; bl izdkj gS%

13-

izkFkhZx.k dk ;g dFku gS fd vizkFkhZ laLFkku dh tks xfrfof/k;kWa gSa] og m|ksx dh ifjHkk"kk esa vkrh gSaA

iRFkj ds uewuksa ds ijh{k.k ls ;wjsfu;e dh igpku gksrh Fkh] mlh ds vk/kkj ij ;wjsfu;e dk mRiknu gksrk FkkA blds

foijhr foi{kh dk ;g rdZ gS fd vizkFkhZ ijek.kq [kfut] vUos"k.k o vuqla/kku ds dk;Z esa jr gS tks m|ksx dh

ifjHkk"kk esa ugha vkrk gSA

14-

bl lUnHkZ esa foi{kh lk{kh fouksn dqekj lh- ds- dk izfrijh{kk esa fd;k x;k ;g dFku egRoiw.kZ gS fd

uewuksa ds ijh{k.k ls ;g irk pyrk gS fd inkFkZ ;wjsfu;e gS vFkok ugha\ ;fn ;wjsfu;e gksrk gS rks mldk mi;ksx

ijek.kq la;a= esa fo|qr mRiknu esa iz;ksx fd;k tkrk gSA bl izdkj mRikfnr fo|qr miHkksDrkvksa iz;ksx esa vkrh gSA

bl leLr izfØ;k esa ekuo ,oa e'khu dk iz;ksx gksrk gSA bl dFku ls ;g mi/kkj.kk ljyrk ls dh tk ldrh gS

fd mRikfnr fo|qr ds miHkksDrkvksa dks foØ; ls izfrQy Lo:i /kujkf'k izkIr gksrh gh gSA vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2 ¼j½

ds vUrZxr ßm|ksxÞ ls fu;kstdksa dk dksbZ dkjckj] O;olk;] miØe] fofuekZ.k ;k vkthfodk vfHkizsr gSaA izkFkhZx.k dh

vksj ls izLrqr fu.kZ; cSaxyksj okVj lIykbZ ,aM lhojst cksMZ cuke vkj- jktIik esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; us dfri;

egRoiw.kZ fn'kk funsZ'k izfrikfnr fd;s gS&rnquqlkj tgkWa dk;Zdykiks ds lapkyu gsrq ra=kRed O;oLFkk tks fu;kstd o

deZdkjksa ds lgdkj ls laxfBr gks] ftlesa lh/kk o lkjoku rRo O;olkf;d gks] tks ekuo mi;ksx ;k lsokFkZ mRiknu

o mlds forj.k ls lacaf/kr gks& ,slk midze Þm|ksxß gksrk gSA

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

401

15-

bl laca/k esa ykHk] gsrqd ;k ykHkkFkZ mn~s'; dh vuqifLFkfr vlaxr gksrh gS rFkk fu;kstd& fu;ksftr ds

e/; laca/kijd dk;Zdyki ij gh cy nsrs gq, fu/kkZj.k visf{kr gksrk gSA foi{kh }kjk LVsV vkWaQ xqtjkr cuke izre

flag ujflag ijekj ds fu.kZ; esa eku- lokZsPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vf/ker dk voyac ysrs gq, ;g dgk gS fd Hkkjr

ljdkj ds ijek.kq mtkZ foHkkx ds v/khu lapkfyr vUos"k.k laLFkku dks m|ksx dh ifjHkk"kk esa ugh j[kk tk ldrk gS

D;ksafd ;g laizHkqrk iw.kZ d`R; dk ,d Hkkx gSA izkFkhZ us ,sls dksbZ rF; izLrqr ugha fd;s gS ftlls vizkFkhZ ds m|ksx

gksus dk rF; fu"dkf"kZr fd;k tk ldsA eSaus bl rdZ o izfrikfnr fof/k ij euu fd;k gSA

16-

izkFkhZ us ;g rF; HkyhHkkWfr izekf.kr fd;k gS fd foi{kh @vizkFkhZ ;|fi ijek.kq mtkZ foHkkx ds v/khu

ijek.kq [kfut vUos"k.k o vuqla/kku dk dk;Z djrk gS& fdarq vizkFkhZ }kjk laikfnr dk;Zdyki tSlk fd foi{kh ds

lk{kh fouksn dqekj lh- ds- }kjk of.kZr gSa& foi{kh dks Þm|ksxß dh ifjHkk"kk ds varxZr ykus dk vk/kkj izdV gksrs gSaSA

uewuksa gsrq fy;s x;s [kfut inkFkksZ dk ijh{k.k o rnqijkar mudk fo|qr ds O;olkf;d mRiknu esa iz;ksx] fuf'pr :Ik

ls Þm|ksxßesa lapkfyr izfØ;k ekuh tk ldrh gS foi{kh laLFkku ijek.kq mtkZ foHkkx dk vax gS tks ijek.kq fo|qr dk

mRiknu Hkh djrk gSA

17-

vf/kfu;e esa micaf/kr ifjHkk"kk o loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vf/kerksa ds izdk'k esa foi{kh }kjk lk{; esa

iznf'kZr i= iznZ'k vkj&1 esa of.kZr fofu'p; ftlesa Je o fof/k ea=ky; }kjk foi{kh laLFkku dks vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk

2 ¼j½ ds vUrZxr ßm|ksxÞ ugha ekuk x;k gS& fdlh izdkj Lohdk;Z ,oa xzkà; ugha gSA foi{kh laLFkku esa ,sls [kfut

dk ijh{k.k o vuqla/kku fd;k tkrk gS& tks ;wjsfu;e izekf.kr gksus ij fo|qr ds O;olkf;d mRiknu esa iz;qDr gksrk

gS& ;g fookfnr ugha gS fd bl izdkj mRikfnr fo|qr ds fodz; ls foi{kh dks O;olkf;d /kuktZu gksrk gSA blfy,

foi{kh laLFkku fuf'pr :Ik ls ßm|ksxÞ gksuk izekf.kr gksrk gSA vr% ;g fcanq izkFkhZx.k ds i{k esa fu.kZr fd;k tkrk

gSaA

18-

1- bl lanHkZ esa izkFkhZ Jhjke 'kekZ us viuh eq[; ijh{kk fnukad 30-01-2020 esa dgk gS fd mldh fu;qfDr

vizkFkhZ fu;kstd ds ;gkWa 06-07-2006 dks prqFkZ Js.kh ¼rduhdh lgk;d½ ds in ij gqbZ FkhA izkFkhZ us

vius iwoZ 'kiFk i= fnukad 06-07-2014 esa fu;qfDr frfFk 06-07-2005 of.kZr dh gS] fdarq vfHkHkk'kd izkFkhZ

us bls Vad.k dh =qfV dgrs gq, 06-07-2006 gh ekuus dk fuosnu fd;k & bl fuosnu ij foi{kh us

vkifRr ugha dh gS& vr% fu;qfDr frfFk 06-07-2006 gh lk{; esa xzg.k dh tk jgh gSaA

19-

izkFkhZ us vkxkeh dFku esa 29-04-2008 rd yxkrkj dk;Z djuk o 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z djuk Hkh dgk

gSA izkFkhZ us Lo;a dh mifLFkfr foi{kh }kjk la/kkfjr xsV&jftLVj esa djuk dgk gSA izkFkhZx.k dk ;g vk{ksi gS fd

foi{kh us eku- mPp U;k;ky; }kjk fn;s x;s funsZ'k ds mijkar Hkh ,usDlj&1 ¼izkFkZuki= fnukad 27-11-2012½ esa of.kZr

vfHkys[k izLrqr ugha fd;k gS&;fn og okafNr vfHkys[k izLrqr fd;k tkrk rks izkFkhZx.k dh mifLFkfr rFkk 240 fnu

ls vf/kd foi{kh ds v/khu yxkrkj dk;Z fd;k tkuk izekf.kr gks tkrkA vr% foi{kh ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk dh

tkosaA foi{kh dk ;g rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k dks oLrqr% va'kdkyhu lafonk ds vk/kkj ij dke ij fy;k x;k FkkA foHkkx

}kjk eLVj jksy j[kk tkrk Fkk ftlesa mifLFkr gkus ij izkFkhZ dh mifLFkfr vafdr dh tkrh FkhA izR;sd ekg esa

Jfed }kjk fd;s x;s dk;Z fnolksa ds vuqlkj mldk Hkqxrku fd;k x;k gSA ftl vof/k esa izkFkhZx.k }kjk dk;Z ugh

fd;k x;k& ml le; ds eLVj jksy gksuk laHko ugha gSA izkFkhZx.k pawfd fu;fer deZpkjh ds :i esa fu;qDr ugha Fks&

blfy, is&fcy jftLVj esa mudk uke vafdr ugha gSA xsV&jftLVj fu;ekuqlkj ,d o"kZ ds fy, j[kk tkrk gS

mlds Ik'pkr u"V dj fn;k tkrk gS&ftldk i`Fkd ls vfHkys[k j[kk tkuk fu;e ds vuqlkj visf{kr ugha gSA

blfy, izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk ds dksbZ vk/kkj fo|eku ugha gSA

20-

foi{kh us l'kiFk dFku djrs gq, okafNr izys[kksa ds laca/k esa ;g dgk gS%

1- xsV&jftLVj 11 ls 14 o"kZ iqjkus gSa& tks ek= 1 o"kZ rd gh lqjf{kr j[ks tkrs gS blfy, izLrqr

ugha fd;s x;sA

2- osru okmplZ izkFkhZx.k ds laca/k esa la/kkfjr gh ugha fd;s x;s D;ksafd os fu;fer vk/kkj ij fu;qDr

ugha FksA Hkqxrku laca/kh izfof"V eLVj jksy ij dh xbZ gS& tks izLrqr fd;s x;s gaSA

3- cSad LVSVesaV izLrqr dj fn;s gSA

4- dk;Z vkoaVu jftLVj& izkFkhZx.k ds fu;fer vk/kkj ij fu;qDr u gksus rFkk izkFkhZx.k dks dksbZ

fof'k"V dk;Z u fn;s tkus ds dkj.k ;g jftLVj la/kkfjr ugha fd;s x;s& izkFkhZx.k dh lsok]

fufonk izLrqr djus ds vk/kkj ij yh xbZ& blfy, izLrqr ugha gq, gSA

5- deZpkfj;ks dh lwph dsoy fu;fer deZpkfj;kas dh j[kh tkrh gS& izkFkhZx.k ds fu;fer deZpkjh u

gksus ls& la/kkfjr ugha dh xbZ o izLrqr ugha gqbZA

6- dz; iaftdk dh] mifLFkfr@Hkqxrku ls lqlaxrrk u gksus ls izLrqr ugha fd;k x;k Fkk fdarq

izfrijh{kk esa izkFkhZ ds vkxzg ij izn'kZ MCY;w&17 ds :Ik esa iznf'kZr gqvk gSA foi{kh }kjk izn'kZ

vkj&7 ls vkj&11 rd eLVj jksy izLrqr fd;s x;s gS tks & izkFkhZ dh mifLFkfr ls lacaf/kr gSaA

402 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

bu eLVj jksy ds vfrfjDr foi{kh us izn'kZ vkj&5 o vkj&6 mifLFkfr i=d Hkh lk{; esa izLrqr

fd;s gS&ftuesa of.kZr mifLFkfr fooj.k izn'kZ W- 7] W- 10] W- 11] W- 12] W- 15] W- 16] ls

lekurk n'kkZrk gSA ;gh ugha izkFkhZ us vius izfrijh{kk esa izn'kZ vkj&5@3@ vuqyXud&3 esa

of.kZr fooj.k dks Lo;a ls lacaf/kr fooj.k gksuk] o lgh gksuk Lohdkj fd;k gSA

21-

izkFkhZ us vius lk{; esa ;g dgk gS fd mls dke djus dk iSlk pSd ls feyrk FkkA 06-02-2020 dks iqu%

fd;s x;s izfrijh{k.k esa mlus dgk gS fd izn'kZ vkj&7 ls vkj&11 rd eLVj jksy ds vk/kkj ij mls uxn Hkqxrku

gqvk gSA var esa ;g Hkh Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mlls ftrus fnu dke fy;k x;k& mldk Hkqxrku foi{kh us dj fn;k

gSA

22-

foi{kh lk{kh lfPpnkuaUn uk;d us ;|fi viuh izfrijh{kk esa dgk gS fd 2006 ds dksbZ eLVj jksy is'k ugha

fd;s gSaSA pSd ls Hkqxrku ds cSad LVsVesaV is'k fd;s gS tks izn'kZ vkj&13 gS fdarq izkFkhZ dks fd;s Hkqxrku dk mYys[k

blesa ugh gS D;ksafd 17-12-2006 ls cSad LVsVesaV is'k fd;k gSA fdarq cSad LVsVesaV o eLVj jksy iwjs izLrqr u gksus ij

Hkh izn'kZ vkj&5 o vkj&6 esa of.kZr mifLFkfr fooj.k dks izkFkhZx.k }kjk lgh gksuk Lohdkj dj ysus ds dkj.k foi{kh

dh ln~HkkfoDrk ij izfrdwy izHkko ugha iM+rk gSaA ;g mi/kkfjr djuk mfpr ugha gS fd foi{kh us izkFkhZx.k dh

okLrfod mifLFkfr dks Nqikus ds mn~s'; ls dksbZ izys[k izLrqr ugha fd;s gksaA D;ksafd izkFkhZx.k dh mifLFkfr laca/kh

fooj.k ftls izkFkhZ us lgh ekuk gS& vfHkys[k ij miyC/k gSaA

23-

vc izkFkhZ }kjk vius izfrijh{kk esa fd;s x;s dqN egRoiw.kZ dFkuksa ij Hkh blh lanHkZ esa fopkj djuk lqlaxr

gSA

izkFkhZ dgrk gS fd mls dksbZ fu;qfDr i= ugha feykA og Bsds dk vFkZ le>rk gSaSA ch- ,- ikl gSA izn'kZ

MCY;w& 3 dks izkFkhZ us Lo;a ds QksVks o gLrk{kj ;qDr gksuk Lohdkj fd;k gSA og ;g Hkh Lohdkj djrk gS fd mlus

izn'kZ MCY;w& 3 ds ek/;e ls Bsds ij dk;Z djus ds fy, vkosnu izLrqr fd;k gS& mlus o"kZ 2007 esa Hkh Bsds ij

dk;Z djus ds fy, vkosnu fd;k FkkA Bsds ij dk;Z djus ds fy, lHkh ls ¼izkFkhZx.k ls½ vyx& vyx gLrk{kj

djok;s tkrs Fks& tks dke djrs Fks& mldk iSlk fey tkrk FkkA izkFkhZ ds bu dFkuks dks izn'kZ vkj&4 o vkj&5

vkns'k ls iqf"V feyrh gS ftlesa izkFkhZ dks DoksVs'kuksa ds vk/kkj ij nks ekg dh vof/k gsrq 6000@& #- esa dk;Z

djokus dh Lohd`fr tkjh dh xbZ gSA ;g Lohd`fr izkFkhZ ds izkFkZuki= izn'kZ vkj&3 ds vk/kkj ij gS ftlesa izkFkhZ us

dke Bsds ij 6000@& #- esa djus dh lgefr nh o ifjopu fd;k gSA

24-

izkFkhZ ds i{k esa izn'kZ W- 5 }kjk vDrwoj 2006 esa fd;s x;s Bsds ds dk;Z gsrq 1550@& #- Lohd`r fd;s

tkus dk mYys[k gSA blls ;g vkHkkl feyrk gS fd izn'kZ R- 5@1 ls izn'kZ R- 6@5 rd Lohd`r mifLFkfr fooj.k

esa ftl vof/k esa izkFkhZx.k dks dk;Zjr ugha gksuk n'kkZ;k x;k gS& ml vof/k esas izkFkhZx.k us Bsds ij O;fDrxr :Ik ls

le;c} o mn~s'; iwfrZ rd fuf'pr /kujkf'k ij dk;Z fd;k gSA

25-

lk{; dh bl fLFkfr rFkk izkFkhZi{k dh LohdkjksfDr ds vfLrRo esa izkFkhZx.k dh foi{kh }kjk fdlh in ij

fu;qfDr fd;k tkuk izekf.kr ugha gksrk& oju ;g izekf.kr gksrk gS fd izkFkhZx.k us foi{kh ds fy, uewuksa ds inkFkZ dh

dVkbZ] filkbZ] lQkbZ] iSfdax] vkfn dk;Z dks Bsds ij djus ds fy, fuf'pr dk;Z laiknu] fuf'pr vof/k esa]& fu;r

/kujkf'k gsrq djus dh lgefr o Lohd`fr nh gSA Bsds ij dk;Z laiknu ds mijkar tuojh 2007 ls vizsy 2008 dh

vof/k esa izkFkhZx.k us fofHkUu efguksa esa izn'kZ R- 5 o R- 6 esa fn;s x;s fooj.k ds vuq:Ik mifLFkr jgdj dk;Z Hkh

fd;kA lk{; ds bl foospu ls vizkFkhZ o izkFkhZx.k ds e/; fu;kstd o deZdkj dk laca/k LFkkfir gksuk izekf.kr ugha

gksrk gSA

26-

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls fu.kZ; fd'ku flag cuke ,Dth- bathfu;j esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g vf/ker fn;k

gS fd tc nSfud osru Hkksxh dks fu;fer in ds fo:} fu;qDr fd;k gks& rks lsok lekfIr ds iwoZ vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk

25 ¼,Q½s ds izko/kkuksa dk vuqikyu vko';d gSa

27-

Mk;jsDVj fQ'kjht VfeZuy fMohtu cuke Hkhdw HkkbZ es?kkth HkkbZ pkoM+k ds fu.kZ; esa eku- mPpre

U;k;ky; us ;g ekxZn'kZu fn;k gS fd /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½s vf/kfu;e ds lanHkZ esa 240 fnu dh yxkrkj lsok izekf.kr djus

gsrq ,d nSfud osru Hkksxh ls leLr mifLFkfr vfHkys[k izLrqr djus dh vis{kk mfpr ugha gSA deZdkj us tc ;g

nkok fd;k gks fd mlus 240 fnu dk;Z fd;k gS rks& fu;kstd ij ;g flf}Hkkj varfjr gks tkrk gS fd og deZdkj

}kjk 240 fnu lsok iw.kZ u djuk izekf.kr djsA

28-

gLrxr izdj.kksa esa izkFkhZx.k }kjk Bsds ij dk;Z djuk o foi{kh }kjk izLrqr mifLFkfr fooj.k dks Lohdkj

dj ysus dh fLFkfr esa bu fu.kZ;ksa esa izfrikfnr fof/k rF;kRed fHkUurk ds dkj.k izkFkhZx.k ds izfr lgk;d ugha gSA

29-

vkj- ,e- ;sykrh cuke vfl- ,DthD;wfVo bathfu;j ds fu.kZ; esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g izfrikfnr

fd;k gS fd 240 fnu lrr lsok djus ds rF; dks izekf.kr djus dk izkFkfed flf}Hkkj oknh@ izkFkhZ ij gh gS& ;g

nkf;Ro oknh }kjk Lohdk;Z lk{; ¼ekSf[kd o izys[kh;½ izLrqr djds mUeksfpr fd;k tkrk gSA nSfud osru Hkksxh

Jfed ;fn fu;kstd ls mifLFkfr o osru Hkqxrku dk vfHkys[k izLrqr djokus dk fuosnu djsa& vkSj fu;kstd izLrqr

u djs& rks fu;kstd ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk djus dk fofu'p; izR;sd ekeys ds rF;ksa ij fuHkZj gksxkA gLrxr

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

403

izdj.kksa dh mi;qZDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds izdk'k esa foi{kh ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk fd;s tkus dk dksbZ vk/kkj fo|eku

ugha gSA rFkk ;g fu.kZ;t fof/k izkFkhZ ds i{k esa lgk;d ugha gSA

30-

fizalhiy Mwaxj dkWayst chdkusj cuke vkseizdk'k esa eku- jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us dgk gS fd deZdkj

tc 240 fnu dh yxkrkj lsok ,d dsys.Mj o"kZ esa iwoZ djus dk nkok djsa ,oa fu;kstd us bl rF; dk okXNy&

iw.kZ [kaMu fd;k gks& rks mls fu;kstd dh Lohd`fr le>k tkosaA

31-

ch- Mh- vks- izkxiqj cuke ;ksfxaUnj dqekj o vU; esa eku- fgekpy izns'k mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fof/k Hkh

rF;kRed fHkUurk ds dkj.k izkFkhZx.k ds izfr lgk;d ugha gSA

32-

blds foijhr foi{kh dh vksj ls ,e- ih- bysfDVªflVh cksMZ cuke gfjjke o lqjsUnz uxj fMfLVªDV iapk;r

cuke Mk;k HkkbZ vejflag ds ekeysa esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vf/ker dk voyEc fy;k x;k gSA bl

fu.kZ; esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd lsok lekfIr ds iwoZorhZ ,d dsys.Mj o"kZ esa 240 fnu

yxkrkj dk;Z djus ds rF; dk flf}Hkkj deZdkj ij gh gSA tc deZdkj bl rF; dks izekf.kr djus gsrq dksbZ lk{;

izLrqr u djs rFkk fu;kstd }kjk eLVj jksy izLrqr djus ij mudk [ka.Mu Hkh u djs& rks ;g dgk tkuk pkfg;s fd

deZdkj us flf}Hkkj dk mUekspu ugha fd;k gSA U;k;ky; dks fu;kstd ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk rc gh djuk

pkfg;s tc okafNr lk{; dk vfLrRo esa gksuk deZdkj izekf.kr djs] ftls izLrqr fd;k tk ldrk gksA Je U;k;ky;

ds le{k tkWp dk ifj{ks= lsok lekfIr ds iwoZorhZ 12 eghuksa rd gh lhfer gS& blh vof/k dks ijhf{kr dj og

fu/kkZfjr djsxk fd deZdkj dks vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ dk laj{k.k ns; gS vFkok ughaA bu fu.kZ;ksa esa ikfjr fof/k

ls ;g Li"V ekxZn'kZu izkIr gksrk gS fd izkFkhZx.k }kjk xsV jftLVj ds izLrqrhdj.k dh ekWx djus ij mlds u"V gks

tkus dk l'kiFk dFku vizkFkhZ }kjk fd;k x;k gS] blfy, ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk gS fd vizkFkhZ us fdlh izys[k ds

vfLrRo esa gksrs gq, Hkh tkuow> dj] izyf{kr mn~s'; ls mls izLrqr ugha fd;k gksA blds vfrfjDr ;g Hkh egRoiw.kZ gS

fd vizkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr mifLFkfr& fooj.k izn'kZ vkj& 5@1 ls vkj& 6@5 o eLVj jksy izn'kZ vkj& 7 ls vkj&

11 rd dks izkFkhZx.k us Lohdkj djrs gq, fo[kafMr ugha fd;k gSA blfy, vizkFkhZ ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk fd;k

tkuk U;k;ksfpr o fof/klEer ugha gSA

33-

foi{kh us ,e- ih- bysfDVªflVh cksMZ cuke gfjjke ds fu.kZ; esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fof/k dk

voyac ysdj ;g Hkh dgk gS fd izkFkhZx.k dk dk;Z vLFkkbZ o vko';drk tfur Fkk& ftls vko';drk u gksus ij

can Hkh fd;k x;k FkkA bl rF; dh iqf"V lk{kh fouksn dqekj lh- ds- ds dFkuksa ls gqbZ gSaA bl fu.kZ; esa eku-

mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g ekxZn'kZu fn;k gS fd lhfer dk;Z ds fy, LFkkuh; O;fDr;ksa dks fn;k x;k fu;kstu& lrr

o fu;fer dk;Z gsrq ugha le>k tk ldrk gSA tc eLVj jksy ls Hkh ;g izdV gks fd fu;fer varjky ij Jfed ls

dk;Z fy;k x;k gS] ;g izekf.kr ugha gksrk gS fd fu;kstd dks ml dk;Z dh lrr vko';drk jgh gksA vizkFkhZ }kjk

izLrqr mifLFkfr fooj.k o eLVj jksy ds voyksdu ls Hkh izkFkhZx.k ls djok;k x;k dk;Z lrr izd`fr dk izekf.kr

ugha gqvk gS& D;ksafd mifLFkfr fooj.k esa izR;sd ekg esa fy;k x;k dk;Z] varjky lfgr gSA

34-

izkFkhZx.k dk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k ls Bsdk& Jfed ds :Ik esa dk;Z ;fn fy;k x;k gS rks vizkFkhZ ds

ikl mDr mn~s'; gsrq vuqKki= gksuk vko';d Fkk& ftldk u gksuk vizkFkhZ us Lohdkj fd;k gS& blfy, izkFkhZx.k

dks vizkFkhZ }kjk fu;qDr gh ekuk tkosaA foi{kh us bl laca/k esa fdlh vuqKki= dh vko';drk u gksuk dg dj rdZ

dk fojks/k fd;k gSA rdZ ij fopkj fd;k x;kA

35-

Bsdk Jfed ¼fofu;eu ,oa mUewyu½ vf/kfu;e 1970 dh /kkjk 1 ds vUrZxr vf/kfu;e ds izko/kkuksa ds

foLrkj dk mica/k fd;k x;k gSA bl vf/kfu;e dh mi/kkjk 1 ¼4½ (a) ds vuqlkj izR;sd ,slk LFkkiu@laLFkku tgkW

chl ;k mlls vf/kd deZdkj fu;ksftr gksa ;k foxr ckjg eghuksa ds nkSjku fdlh fnu fu;ksftr jgs gks& ij gh

vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku iz;ksT; gksxsaA bu izdj.kksa esa izkFkhZx.k us ,slh dksbZ lk{; izLrqr ugha dh gS ftlls vizkFkhZ ds

v/khu chl ;k mlls vf/kd deZdkjksa dk fu;ksftr gksuk izekf.kr gksrk gksA blfy, izkFkhZx.k dk ;g rdZ lkjoku

ugha gSA

36-

mi;ZqDr foospu ls ;g Li"V :Ik ls izekf.kr gS fd izkFkhZx.k lsok lekfIr dh frfFk 29-04-2008 ls iwoZorhZ

,d dsys.Mj o"kZ dh vof/k esa vizkFkhZ ds fu;kstu esa 240 fnu yxkrkj dk;Z djus dk rF; izekf.kr djus esa foQy

jgs gSa& blfy, vizkFkhZ }kjk izkFkhZx.k dh NVuh 30-04-2008 ls fd;k tkuk Hkh Lo;a gh izekf.kr ugha gksrk gSA

ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa ds varxZr fdlh izdkj dk laj{k.k izkIr djus ds

vf/kdkjh izekf.kr ugha gq, gSA vr% ;g fopkj.kh; fcanq izkFkhZx.k ds fo:} fu.khZr fd;k tkrk gSA

37-

foi{kh us ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mUgksaus izkFkhZx.k dks vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa ds varxZr

dksbZ uksfVl ugha fn;k u gh uksfVl osru o {kfriwfrZ dk Hkqxrku fd;k& D;ksafd uksfVl LFkkbZ deZpkfj;ksa dks fn;k

tkrk gS rFkk izkFkhZx.k Lo;a gh dke NksM+ dj pys tkrs FksA fcanq la- 2 ds fofu'p; ds izdk'k esa izkFkhZx.k dks pawfd

vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa dk laj{k.k izkIr ugha gqvk gS] blfy, bu izko/kkuks dh ikyuk fd;s tkus

dh ck/;rk vizkFkhZ dks ugha Fkh& vr% ;g fcanq izkFkhZx.k ds fo:} fu.khZr fd;k tkrk gSA

404 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

38-

bl fcanq ds laca/k esa izkFkhZ us vius dFku esa dgk gS fd vizkFkhZ }kjk dksbZ ofj"Brk lwph ugh cukbZ og tks

dk;Z djrk Fkk& mls vU; Jfeadks ls djok;k tk jgk gSA ;g mYys[kuh; gS fd izkFkhZ us vius vfHkopukas ;k lk{;

esa mu O;fDr;ksa dk uke Hkh of.kZr ugha fd;k gS ftUgsa izkFkhZ dks lsokeqDr djus ds mijkar dfu"B gksus ij Hkh lsok esa

j[kk x;k gksA

39-

foi{kh us vius lk{; esa dgk gS fd izkFkhZ ds dk;Z NksM+dj pys tkus ds okn mDr dk;Z dh lekfIr ij

fdlh vU; Jfed dks dk;Z ij ugha yxk;k x;k gS rFkk fdlh dfu"B Jfed dks fu;qfDr ugha nh xbZ gSA izfrijh{kk

esa ;g Hkh dgk gS fd orZeku esa Bsds ij tks Jfed dk;Zjr gS os ml dk;Z ls layXu ugha gS ftl ij izkFkhZ dk;Zjr

jgk gSA orZeku Jfedksa dh dk;Z dh izd`fr orZeku deZpkjh ls fHkUu gSaA

40-

izkFkhZ dh izfr ijh{kk esa mlus Lohdkj fd;k gS fd izn'kZ vkj& 12 lwph esa mldk uke ugha gS D;ksafd og

LFkkbZ deZpkfj;ksa dh lwph gSA foi{kh dk ;g Hkh lk{; gS fd pWwfd izkFkhZ fu;fer deZpkjh ugha Fkk blfy, is fcy

jftLVj esa mldk uke ugha gSA izkFkhZ dk uke rks eLVj jksy esa gh vafdr gksrk FkkA

41-

fcanq la- 2 ds fofu'p; ls ;g LFkkfir gks pqdk gS fd vizkFkhZ }kjk izkFkhZx.k dks fdlh LFkkbZ ;k fu;fer

in ij fu;qfDr ugha nh xbZ Fkh& oju izkFkhZx.k dks dk;Z dh vko';drk gsrq vLFkkbZ :Ik ls lafonk ds vk/kkj ij

fuf'pr jkf'k ds Hkqxrku ij j[kk FkkA ,sls Jfedksa dh dksbZ ofj"Brk lwph dk la/kkj.k fd;k tkuk foi{kh ds fy,

ck/;dkjh ugha gSA

42-

eku- mPpre U;k;ky; us lqjsUnz uxj fMfLVªDV iapk;r cuke Mk;k HkkbZ vejflag ds fu.kZ; esa leku rF;ksa

ij fopkj djrs gq, ;g dgk gS fd fu;fer fu;kstu ds vHkko esa ofj"Brk lwph dk la/kkj.k fu;kstd ls visf{kr ugha

Fkk& nSfud osru Hkksxh Jfedksa dh ofj"Brk lwph dk la/kkj.k fof/kd vis{kk ugha gSA bl foospu ds mijkar ;g fcanq

izkFkhZ ds fo:} fu.khZr fd;k tkrk gSA

fopkj.kh; fcanqvksa ij izkIr foosfpr fu"d"kZ ds vk/kkj ij vizkFkhZ laLFkku ;|fi m|ksx dh ifjHkk"kk ds

vUrxZr vkuk izekf.kr gqvk gS fdarq lk{; ds v/kkj ij vizkFkhZ }kjk izkFkhZx.k dh NVuh fd;k tkuk izekf.kr ugh

gqvk gS& blfy, vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa dk laj{k.k izkFkhZx.k dks miyC/k ugha gSA vizkFkhZ }kjk

izkFkhZ ls fdlh dfu"Brj O;fDr dks lsok esa j[kk tkuk fl) ugha gqvk gS&bl izdkj izkFkhZx.k vf/kfu;e ds varxZr

fdlh Hkh izko/kku dk laj{k.k ikus dks vf/kdkjoku izekf.kr ugha gq, gSA blfy, izkFkhZx.k vizkFkhZ ds fo:} dksbZ

vuqrks"k ikus ds vf/kdkjh ugha gSA

vr% izkFkhZx.k& vizkFkhZ laLFkku ds fo:} dksbZ vuqrks"k izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh ugha gSa& vf/kfu.kZ; blh

izdkj ikfjr fd;k tkrk gSA vf/kfu.kZ; dh izfr izR;sd vkS|ksfxd fookn i=koyh esa layXu dh tkos rFkk iapkV dh

izfrfyfi vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 dh /kkjk 17 ¼1½ ds vuqlj.k esa izdk'kukFkZ izsf"kr dh tkosaA

iapkV vkt fnukad 29 fnlEcj 2020 dks fy[kk o gLrk{kfjr fd;k x;kA

jk/kk eksgu prqosZnh] ihBklhu vf/kdkjh

नई दिल् ली, 3 फरवरी, 2021

का.आ. 153

—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्री

सरकार ijek.kq [kkfut vUos"k.k ,oa vuqla/kku funs'kky;] if'pe {ks=] ijek.kq mtkZ foHkkx] ि ृुर (राि) के

प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री मनोि कुमार ृीृलीवाल, कामगार के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्ििष्ट औद्योजगक

जववाि में केन्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण- सि- श्रम न् ा ाल , ि ृुर के ृंचाट (संिभि सं्‍ ा 28/2011) को

िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज, प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्री सरकार को 03.02.2021 को प्राप्त हुआ ा।

[सं. एल-14012/1/2009-आईआर (डी ू)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

405

New Delhi, the 3rd February, 2021

S.O. 153.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 28/2011) of the Central Government Industrial-Tribunal-cum

Labour Court Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

The Atomic Mineral Directorate for Exploration and Research, Department of Atomic Energy, Jaipur (Raj) and

Shri Manoj Kumar Pipliwal , Worker which was received by the Central Government on 03.02.2021.

[No. L-14012/1/2009 IR (DU)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

jk/kk eksgu prqosZnh

ihBklhu vf/kdkjh

ReferenceNo.L-14012/1/2009-IR(DU) Dated:13.7.2011

Jh eukst dqekj ihiyhoky iq= Jh dUgS;k yky fuoklh IykV ua- 23 ekSth uxj dkyksuh] izrki uxj] lsDVj&8]

lkaxkusj] t;iqjA

---izkFkhZx.k

ijek.kq [kkfut vUos"k.k ,oa vuqla/kku funs'kky; if'pe {ks=]

ijek.kq mtkZ foHkkx] Hkkjr ljdkj ,- ,e- Mh- dEiysDl- lsDVj&5]

foLrkj izrki uxj lkaxkusj] t;iqj& }kjk funs'kd

---vizkFkhZ@foi{kh

izkFkhZx.k dh rjQ ls % Jh dq.kky jkor vf/koDrk

vizkFkhZx.k dh rjQ ls % Jh nsos'k dqekj caly vf/koDrk

fnukad % 29-12-2020

1-

Je ,oa fu;kstu ea=ky; Hkkjr ljdkj ubZ fnYyh }kjk fnukad 13-07-2011 dks vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e

1947 ¼ftls vkxs ek= vf/kfu;e dgk tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 10 ¼1½ ¼Mh½ ds vUrxZr iznRr 'kfDr;ks ds vuqlj.k esa

mi;qZDr ikaWapksa izkFkhZx.k ds laEc/k esa fuEukafdr ¼lesfdr :i esa½ fookn U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq bl vf/kdj.k dks lanfHkZr

fd;s x;s %&

“Whether the action of the Management of Atomic Mineral Directorate for Exploration and Research,

Department of Atomic Energy, Jaipur in terminating the services of (1) Sh. Shri Ram Sharma s/o

Shri Lallu Lal Sharma, (2) Shri Dhanna Lal s/o Shri Jagdish Bairwa, (3) Shri Rakesh Kumar Upadhyay

s/o Shri Hari Kishan Sharma, (4) Shri Chhagan Lal Dhanka s/o Shri Gulab Chand Dhanka and (5)

Shri Manoj Kumar Pipliwal s/o Shri kanhaiya Lal Pipliwal. w.e.f. 30.04.2008 is legal and justified?

What relief the workmen are entitled to? ’’

2-

mi;qZDr ikWapksa fookn bl vf/kdj.k dks izkIr gksus ij mHk;i{k dks vkgwr djrs gq,& izkFkhZx.k dks funsZ'k

fn;k x;k fd os vius nkos dk vfHkdFku izLrqr djasA rnqijkar izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls fnukad 04-10-2011 dks nkos ds

vfHkdFku izLrqr fd;s x;sA izkFkhZx.k ds dFku la{ksi esa bl izdkj of.kZr gSaA izkFkhZx.k dks 05-07-2005 ls 10-01-2006

ds e/; fofHkUu frfFk;ksa ij prqFkZ Js.kh ¼gsYij rduhdh lgk;d½ ds in ij vizkFkhZ }kjk fu;qDr fd;k x;kA

izkFkhZx.k iRFkj ds uewuksa dh filkbZ] NukbZ] f?klkbZ o vU; dk;kZy;h dk;Z vizkFkhZ ds vf/kdkfj;kas ds fn'kk funsZ'k ij

djrs FksA vizkFkhZ laLFkku m|ksx dh ifjHkk"kk esa vkrk gSaA izkFkhZx.k dks vizkFkhZ us fnukad 30-04-2008 dks voS/k :Ik ls

lsok eqDr dj fn;kA

3-

izkFkhZx.k o vizkFkhZ ds e/; fu;kstd&deZdkj ds laca/k FksA izkFkhZx.k dh lsok eqfDr ls iwoZ /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½

vf/kfu;e ds vuqlkj uksfVl@uksfVl osru o {kfriwfrZ jkf'k dk Hkqxrku izkFkhZx.k dks ugha fd;k x;kA izkFkhZx.k ls tks

dk;Z djok;k tk jgk Fkk og LFkkbZ izd`fr dk Fkk o vkt Hkh vU; Jfedkas ls djok;k tk jgk gSA izkFkhZx.k us 240

fnu ls vf/kd fnuksa rd yxkrkj dk;Z fd;k gSA vizkFkhZ us Jfedksa dh ofj"Brk lwph ugha cukbZ u gh dksbZ ?kjsyw

tkWap dh& rFkk vuqfpr Je O;ogkj fd;kA bl izdkj /kkjk 25] ¼,Q½@ ¼th½@ ¼,p½ vf/kfu;e o fu;e 77 o 78

ds izko/kkuks dk mYya?ku fd;k gSA izkFkhZx.k lsok eqfDr ds Ik'pkr ls csjkstxkj gaSA vr% fnukad 30-04-2008 dks dh

xbZ izkFkhZx.k dh lsok lekfIr dks voS| ?kksf"kr djrs gq, izkFkhZx.k dks foxr osru o ifjykHkksa lfgr lsok esa cgky

fd;k tkosA

406 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4-

vizkFkhZ@foi{kh us fnukad 04-07-2012 dks ikWapks izdj.kksa esa oknksÙkj izLrqr djrs gq, ;g dgk gSa fd izkFkhZx.k

dks fdlh in ij fu;qfDr ugha nh xbZ] cfYd vko';d dk;Z djus ds fy, vkdfLed Jfed ds :Ik esa va'kdkyhu

lafonk ds vk/kkj ij j[kk x;k FkkA blfy, lsok eqfDr dk iz'u gh mRiUu ugha gksrk gSA vizkFkhZ m|ksx dh Js.kh esa

ugha vkrk gSA izkFkhZx.k dks dk;Z miyC/krk ij tkjh fufonk o fu/kkZfjr ctV esa dk;Z lEiUu djus gsrq j[kk tkus ls

,slh fu;qfDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2 ¼vks vks½s ¼ch ch½ ds vUrZxr vkrh gS o /kkjk 25&,Q ds izko/kku vkd`"V gh ughs

gksrs gSaA izkFkhZx.k ,d o"kZ esa 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z djuk izekf.kr ugha dj ik;s gSaA vizkFkhZ }kjk vf/kfu;e o

fu;eksa dh vogsyuk ugha dh xbZ gS u gh dksbZ vuqfpr Je vH;kl fd;k x;k gSaA fdlh vU; Jfed dks dk;Z gsrq

ugha yxk;k x;k gSA vr% okn vLohdkj fd;s tkosaA

5-

izkFkhZx.k us 24-09-2012 dks oknksRrj dk [kaMu djrs gq, vfrfjDr dFku Hkh izLrqr fd;s gSa&vkSj iqu% nkos

ds vfHkdFkuksa dks Lohdkj djus dk fuosnu fd;k gSaA

6-

mi;qZDr ikWapksa fookn izdj.kksa esa izkFkhZx.k ds vfHkdFku o oknksRrj leku gSa rFkk izkFkhZx.k dh lsok dh

izd`fr o lsok lekfIr dh frfFk Hkh leku gh gSaA blfy, bu ikWapksa fooknks esa mRiUu fooknfcanq leku gksus ls bu

fooknksa dk vf/kfu.kZ;u ,dhd`r :Ik ls mHk;i{k dh lgefr ls fd;k tk jgk gSaA

7-

izkFkhZx.k us vius vius nkos ds vfHkdFku ds leZFku gsrq lk{; esa Lo;a izkFkhZ ,- M-& 1 Jh jke 'ekZ]

Jh /kUuk yky] Jh jkds'k dqekj mik/;k;] Jh Nxu yky /kkudk ,oa Jh eukst dqekj ihiyhoky dks ijhf{kr fd;k

gSA izys[kh; lk{; esa izn'kZ 1 ls 17 rd izys[kkas dks Jh jke 'kekZ ls lacaf/kr izdj.k esa iznf'kZr fd;k gSA pwafd bu

ikWapksa gh izdj.kksa esa okndkj.k] i{kdkj o lk{; dh izd`fr leku gS& mHk;i{k dh lgefr ls fookn la- 24@2011

Jh jke 'kekZ cuke funs'kd] ijek.kq [kkfut vUos"k.k ,oa vuqla/kku esa mHk;i{k }kjk izLrqr lk{; dks gh ikWapksa fooknks

ds laca/k esa izHkkoh ekudj foospu gsrq xzg.k fd;k tk jgk gSA

blh Øe esa foi{kh@vizkFkhZ us vius lk{; esa ,u- ,- M- 1 fouksn dqekj lh- ds- ¼lgk- dkfeZd vf/kdkjh½ dks ijh{kr

fd;k o izn'kZ vkj&1 ls vkj&6 izys[kksa dks iznf'kZr fd;k gSA

8-

fnukad 22-12-2017 dks bl vf/kdj.k }kjk ikWapksa fooknksa esa vf/kfu.kZ; ikfjr dj izkFkhZx.k dks dksbZ vuqrks"k

ikus dk vf/kdkjh ugha ekurs gq, nkoksa dks fujLr dj fn;k x;kA bl vf/kfu.kZ; ds fo:} izkFkhZx.k us eku- mPp

U;k;ky; esa fjV ;kfpdk izLrqr dhA eku- jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us fnukad 28-08-2019 dks fu.kZ; ikfjr djrs gq,

fjV ;kfpdk Lohdkj dj vf/kfu.kZ; fnukad 22-12-2017 dks vikLr dj fn;k rFkk ekeys bl vf/kdj.k dks iqu%

fofuf'pr djus gsrq izfrizsf"kr dj fn;sA eku- mPp U;k;ky; es ;g funsZ'k fn;k fd izkFkhZx.k }kjk ,usDlj&1

¼izkFkZuki= fnukad 27-11-2012½ ds ek/;e ls visf{kr izys[kksa dk]s tks foi{kh ds ikl miyC/k gS Je U;k;ky; ds le{k

izLrqr fd;k tkosa&rFkk izkFkhZx.k dks bu vfHkys[kksa dks ijhf{kr djus rFkk vius i{k dks LFkkfir djus dk leqfpr

volj fn;k tkosA

bl fu.kZ; ds vuqlj.k esa foi{kh dks izys[kksa ds izLrqrhdj.k dk funsZ'k fn;k x;k rFkk izLrqfrdj.k ds

mijkUr mHk;i{k dks vfrfjDr lk{; izLrqr djus dk volj Hkh fn;k x;kA izkFkhZ us vius lk{; esa iqu% ,- M- 1

Jh jke 'kekZ dks ijhf{kr fd;k rFkk vfrfjDr izys[kh lk{; esa izn'kZ W 17 iznf'kZr fd;kA foi{kh@vizkFkhZ us

vfrfjDr lk{; esa ,u- ,- M- 2 lfPpnkuaUn uk;d mi{ks=h; funs'kd o ,u- ,- M- 3 y[ku yky 'kekZ dks ijhf{kr

fd;k o izys[kh; lk{; esa izn'kZ vkj 7 ls vkj 13 rd izys[k iznf'kZr fd;sA

9-

fnukad 03-11-2020 ls 09-12-2020 rd fofHkUu frfFk;ksa ij mHk;i{k ds rdZ&forZd lqus x;s o miyC/k lk{;

dk ifj'khyu fd;k x;kA

10-

izkFkhZx.k ds vfHkHkk"kd dk ;g izeq[k rdZ gS fd ,usDlj&1 izkFkZuki= fnukad 27-11-2012 esa of.kZr o okafNr

izys[kksa dks vizkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr gh ugha fd;k x;k gS & u gh izLrqr u djus dk djus dk dksbZ larqf"Vizn dkj.k

izLrqr fd;k gSA blfy, vizkFkhZ ds fo:} ;g izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk dh tkos fd ;fn og izkfFkZr vfHkys[kksa dks izLrqr

djrs rks izkFkhZx.k dk foi{kh ds v/khu fu;fer 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Zjr jgus dk rF; izekf.kr gks tkrkA vizkFkhZ

us vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼Mh½ dh ikyuk u djrs gq, mifLFkfr dk dksbZ vfHkys[k la/kkfjr ugha fd;kA tks izys[k

foi{kh us u"V gks tkus ds dkj.k izLrqr ugha dj ikuk dgk gS muds u"V djus laca/kh dksbZ lk{; izLrqr gh ugha dh

gSaA lk{kh Jhjke 'kekZ ds iwoZorhZ 'kiFki= esa fu;qfDr frfFk 06-07-2005 =qfV o'k vafdr gks xbZ gS ftls 06-07-2006 gh

i<+k tkos tks Ik'pkrorhZ vfrfjDr lk{; 'kiFki= esa vfdr gSA vfHkys[kksa dks u"V djus dk dksbZ izek.k gh ugha gSA

foi{kh lk{kh y[ku yky Lohdkj djrk gS fd xsV jftLVj esa izfof"V fd;s fcuk dksbZ vUnj ugh tk ldrk gSA fdarq

ogh xsV jftLVj foi{kh us is'k ugh fd;k gSA Bsdsnkj }kjk fu;qfDr dk rdZ foi{kh us fn;k gS fdarq Bsdsnkj dk dksbZ

ykbZlsal izLrqr gh ugh fd;k gSaA vr% izkFkhZx.k ds nkoksa dks Lohdkj dj izkfFkZr vuqrks"k iznku fd;k tkosA mUgksaus

vius rdksZ ds leZFku esa fuEukafdr U;kf;d n`"Vkar izLrqr fd;s%

1- cSaxyksj okVj lIykbZ ,aM lhojst cksMZ cuke vkj- jktIik o vU; 1978 ,- vkbZ- vkj- 548

2- fd'ku flag cuke ,fDtfDVo bath- gfj;k.kk LVsV ,xzh- ekdsZfVax cksMZ ,- vkbZ- vkj- 2010 lq- dksVZ] ¼lIyh-½

787

3- Mk;jsDVj fQ'kjht VfeZuy fMohtu cuke Hkhdw HkkbZ es?kkth HkkbZ pkoM+k ,- vkbZ- vkj- 2010 lq- dksVZ] 1236

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

407

4- vkj- ,e- ;sykrh cuke vfl- ,DthD;wfVo bathfu;j flfoy vihy la- 5124@2004 fu.kZ;& 07-11-2005-

5- esfduksu eSadth fy- cuke esfduksu ,EiykbZt ;wfu;u flfoy vihy la- 5319@2008 lq- dksVZ] fu.kZ;&

25-02-2015-

6- fizalhiy Mwaxj dkWayst chdkusj cuke vkseizdk'k 1999 ysc- vkbZ- lh- 97 ¼jktLFkku½

7- ch- Mh- vks- izkxiqj cuke ;ksfxaUnj dqekj 2008 ¼118½ ,Q- ,y- vkj- 460 ¼fg- izns'k½

11-

vizkFkhZ ds vfHkHkk"kd dk ;g izeq[k rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k us vius iq"V lk{; ls ;g izekf.kr gh ugha fd;k gS

fd mUgksaus vizkFkhZ ds v/khu 240 fnu ls vf/kd&,d o"kZ dh vof/k esa dk;Z fd;k tcfd ;g fl}hHkkj izkFkhZx.k ij

gh vkjksfir gSA izkFkhZ Jhjke 'kekZ ¼o vU; izkFkhZx.k½ us Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mUgsa dksbZ fu;qfDr i= ugha feyk gS u gh

dksbZ vkosnu fu;qfDr gsrq fn;kA o"kZ 2005 ls 2008 rd ,d o"kZ esa fdrus fdrus fnu dk;Z fd;k ;g Hkh ;kn ugha

gSA izn'kZ W- 3 o W- 7 dk mYys[k djrs gq, mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ us Bsds ij dk;Z djus gsrq vkosnu fd;k

gSA izkFkhZx.k us ;g Hkh Lohdkj fd;k gS fd vuqyXud&3 ¼Ex. R/5½ mlls lacaf/kr gS rFkk blesa vfdar dk;Z fnol

lgh gS izn'kZ W- 10 ls W- 12 mlds Hkqxrku ls lacaf/kr gSA LohdkjksfDr ds mijkaUr fdlh izek.k dh vko';drk

'ks"k ugha jgrh gSA lk{; dh bl fLFkfr esa izkFkhZx.k dk ;g vk{ksi Lohdk;Z ugha gSa fd vizkFkhZ us mifLFkfr vfHkys[k

dk la/kkj.k ugha fd;k vFkok izLrqr ugha fd;k gSaS blfy, vizkFkhZ ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk dk dksbZ vk/kkj ugha

gSA izkFkhZ dks lafonk ds vk/kkj ij dk;Z djus gsrq fu;r mn~s'; ls j[kk x;k Fkk blfy, Hkh os vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25

¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa dk laj{k.k ugh ik ldrs gaSA vizkFkhZ vUos"k.k ,oa vuqla/kku ds dk;Z ls lac} gS tks m|ksx dh

ifjHkk"kk esa ugha vkrk gSA vr% okn vLohdkj fd;s tkosaA mUgksus vius rdZ ds leZFku esa fuEukafdr U;kf;d n`"Vkar

o vfHkys[k la/kkj.k vof/k dh foHkkxh; rkfydk dh izfr izLrqr dh gS%

1- lqjsUnz uxj fMfLVªDV iapk;r cuke Mk;k HkkbZ vejflag flfoy vihy la- 6511@2005 fu.kZ; 25-10-2005

¼lqizhe dksVZ½A

2- ,e- ih- bysfDVªflVh cksMZ cuke gfjjke flfoy vihy la- 2240@2001 fu.kZ; 27-09-2004 ¼lqizhe dksVZ½A

3- LVsV vkWaQ xqtjkr cuke izre flag ujflag ijekj ¼2001½ 9 lqizhe dksVZ dslst 713A

12-

mHk;i{k ds rdksZ] lk{; ,oa U;kf;d n`"Vkarks esa ikfjr fof/k ij lE;d fopkj djus ds mijkaUr bu fooknksa esa

fuEukafdr fookn fcanq& U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq mRiUu gq, gSa%

1- D;k vizkFkhZ@foi{kh] vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2 ¼j½ ds vFkkZUrxZr m|ksx gS\

---izkFkhZx.k

2- D;k izkFkhZx.k dks vizkFkhZ }kjk prqFkZ Js.kh ¼gsYij rduhdh lgk;d½ ds in ij tqykbZ 2005 ls tqykbZ 2006

ds e/; fu;qDr fd;k x;k rFkk izkFkhZx.k us vizkFkhZ ds v/khu 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z ,d dsys.Mj& o"kZ esa

fd;k gS\

---izkFkhZx.k

3- D;k foi{kh }kjk izkFkhZx.k dh lsok lekfIr ds iwoZ vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkukas dk vuqikyu

ugha fd;k x;k\

---izkFkhZx.k

4- D;k foi{kh }kjk deZdkjksa dh ofj"Brk lwph ugha cukbZ xbZ ,oa izkFkhZx.k dh lsok lekIr djus ds mijkaUr

izkFkhZx.k ls dfu"Brj O;fDr;ksa dks lsok esa j[kk x;k\

---izkFkhZx.k

5- vuqrks"k\

mHk;i{k ds rdksZ lk{; ,oa fof/k ij fopkj ds mijkaUr izR;sd fopkj.kh; fcUnq ij fofu'p; bl izdkj gS%

13-

izkFkhZx.k dk ;g dFku gS fd vizkFkhZ laLFkku dh tks xfrfof/k;kWa gSa] og m|ksx dh ifjHkk"kk esa vkrh gSaA

iRFkj ds uewuksa ds ijh{k.k ls ;wjsfu;e dh igpku gksrh Fkh] mlh ds vk/kkj ij ;wjsfu;e dk mRiknu gksrk FkkA blds

foijhr foi{kh dk ;g rdZ gS fd vizkFkhZ ijek.kq [kfut] vUos"k.k o vuqla/kku ds dk;Z esa jr gS tks m|ksx dh

ifjHkk"kk esa ugha vkrk gSA

14-

bl lUnHkZ esa foi{kh lk{kh fouksn dqekj lh- ds- dk izfrijh{kk esa fd;k x;k ;g dFku egRoiw.kZ gS fd

uewuksa ds ijh{k.k ls ;g irk pyrk gS fd inkFkZ ;wjsfu;e gS vFkok ugha\ ;fn ;wjsfu;e gksrk gS rks mldk mi;ksx

ijek.kq la;a= esa fo|qr mRiknu esa iz;ksx fd;k tkrk gSA bl izdkj mRikfnr fo|qr miHkksDrkvksa iz;ksx esa vkrh gSA

bl leLr izfØ;k esa ekuo ,oa e'khu dk iz;ksx gksrk gSA bl dFku ls ;g mi/kkj.kk ljyrk ls dh tk ldrh gS

fd mRikfnr fo|qr ds miHkksDrkvksa dks foØ; ls izfrQy Lo:i /kujkf'k izkIr gksrh gh gSA vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2 ¼j½

ds vUrZxr ßm|ksxÞ ls fu;kstdksa dk dksbZ dkjckj] O;olk;] miØe] fofuekZ.k ;k vkthfodk vfHkizsr gSaA izkFkhZx.k dh

vksj ls izLrqr fu.kZ; cSaxyksj okVj lIykbZ ,aM lhojst cksMZ cuke vkj- jktIik esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; us dfri;

egRoiw.kZ fn'kk funsZ'k izfrikfnr fd;s gS&rnquqlkj tgkWa dk;Zdykiks ds lapkyu gsrq ra=kRed O;oLFkk tks fu;kstd o

408 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

deZdkjksa ds lgdkj ls laxfBr gks] ftlesa lh/kk o lkjoku rRo O;olkf;d gks] tks ekuo mi;ksx ;k lsokFkZ mRiknu

o mlds forj.k ls lacaf/kr gks& ,slk midze Þm|ksxß gksrk gSA

15-

bl laca/k esa ykHk] gsrqd ;k ykHkkFkZ mn~s'; dh vuqifLFkfr vlaxr gksrh gS rFkk fu;kstd& fu;ksftr ds

e/; laca/kijd dk;Zdyki ij gh cy nsrs gq, fu/kkZj.k visf{kr gksrk gSA foi{kh }kjk LVsV vkWaQ xqtjkr cuke izre

flag ujflag ijekj ds fu.kZ; esa eku- lokZsPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vf/ker dk voyac ysrs gq, ;g dgk gS fd Hkkjr

ljdkj ds ijek.kq mtkZ foHkkx ds v/khu lapkfyr vUos"k.k laLFkku dks m|ksx dh ifjHkk"kk esa ugh j[kk tk ldrk gS

D;ksafd ;g laizHkqrk iw.kZ d`R; dk ,d Hkkx gSA izkFkhZ us ,sls dksbZ rF; izLrqr ugha fd;s gS ftlls vizkFkhZ ds m|ksx

gksus dk rF; fu"dkf"kZr fd;k tk ldsA eSaus bl rdZ o izfrikfnr fof/k ij euu fd;k gSA

16-

izkFkhZ us ;g rF; HkyhHkkWfr izekf.kr fd;k gS fd foi{kh @vizkFkhZ ;|fi ijek.kq mtkZ foHkkx ds v/khu

ijek.kq [kfut vUos"k.k o vuqla/kku dk dk;Z djrk gS& fdarq vizkFkhZ }kjk laikfnr dk;Zdyki tSlk fd foi{kh ds

lk{kh fouksn dqekj lh- ds- }kjk of.kZr gSa& foi{kh dks Þm|ksxß dh ifjHkk"kk ds varxZr ykus dk vk/kkj izdV gksrs gSaSA

uewuksa gsrq fy;s x;s [kfut inkFkksZ dk ijh{k.k o rnqijkar mudk fo|qr ds O;olkf;d mRiknu esa iz;ksx] fuf'pr :Ik

ls Þm|ksxßesa lapkfyr izfØ;k ekuh tk ldrh gS foi{kh laLFkku ijek.kq mtkZ foHkkx dk vax gS tks ijek.kq fo|qr dk

mRiknu Hkh djrk gSA

17-

vf/kfu;e esa micaf/kr ifjHkk"kk o loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vf/kerksa ds izdk'k esa foi{kh }kjk lk{; esa

iznf'kZr i= iznZ'k vkj&1 esa of.kZr fofu'p; ftlesa Je o fof/k ea=ky; }kjk foi{kh laLFkku dks vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk

2 ¼j½ ds vUrZxr ßm|ksxÞ ugha ekuk x;k gS& fdlh izdkj Lohdk;Z ,oa xzkà; ugha gSA foi{kh laLFkku esa ,sls [kfut

dk ijh{k.k o vuqla/kku fd;k tkrk gS& tks ;wjsfu;e izekf.kr gksus ij fo|qr ds O;olkf;d mRiknu esa iz;qDr gksrk

gS& ;g fookfnr ugha gS fd bl izdkj mRikfnr fo|qr ds fodz; ls foi{kh dks O;olkf;d /kuktZu gksrk gSA blfy,

foi{kh laLFkku fuf'pr :Ik ls ßm|ksxÞ gksuk izekf.kr gksrk gSA vr% ;g fcanq izkFkhZx.k ds i{k esa fu.kZr fd;k tkrk

gSaA

18-

2- bl lanHkZ esa izkFkhZ Jhjke 'kekZ us viuh eq[; ijh{kk fnukad 30-01-2020 esa dgk gS fd mldh fu;qfDr

vizkFkhZ fu;kstd ds ;gkWa 06-07-2006 dks prqFkZ Js.kh ¼rduhdh lgk;d½ ds in ij gqbZ FkhA izkFkhZ us

vius iwoZ 'kiFk i= fnukad 06-07-2014 esa fu;qfDr frfFk 06-07-2005 of.kZr dh gS] fdarq vfHkHkk'kd izkFkhZ

us bls Vad.k dh =qfV dgrs gq, 06-07-2006 gh ekuus dk fuosnu fd;k & bl fuosnu ij foi{kh us

vkifRr ugha dh gS& vr% fu;qfDr frfFk 06-07-2006 gh lk{; esa xzg.k dh tk jgh gSaA

19-

izkFkhZ us vkxkeh dFku esa 29-04-2008 rd yxkrkj dk;Z djuk o 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z djuk Hkh dgk

gSA izkFkhZ us Lo;a dh mifLFkfr foi{kh }kjk la/kkfjr xsV&jftLVj esa djuk dgk gSA izkFkhZx.k dk ;g vk{ksi gS fd

foi{kh us eku- mPp U;k;ky; }kjk fn;s x;s funsZ'k ds mijkar Hkh ,usDlj&1 ¼izkFkZuki= fnukad 27-11-2012½ esa of.kZr

vfHkys[k izLrqr ugha fd;k gS&;fn og okafNr vfHkys[k izLrqr fd;k tkrk rks izkFkhZx.k dh mifLFkfr rFkk 240 fnu

ls vf/kd foi{kh ds v/khu yxkrkj dk;Z fd;k tkuk izekf.kr gks tkrkA vr% foi{kh ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk dh

tkosaA foi{kh dk ;g rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k dks oLrqr% va'kdkyhu lafonk ds vk/kkj ij dke ij fy;k x;k FkkA foHkkx

}kjk eLVj jksy j[kk tkrk Fkk ftlesa mifLFkr gkus ij izkFkhZ dh mifLFkfr vafdr dh tkrh FkhA izR;sd ekg esa

Jfed }kjk fd;s x;s dk;Z fnolksa ds vuqlkj mldk Hkqxrku fd;k x;k gSA ftl vof/k esa izkFkhZx.k }kjk dk;Z ugh

fd;k x;k& ml le; ds eLVj jksy gksuk laHko ugha gSA izkFkhZx.k pawfd fu;fer deZpkjh ds :i esa fu;qDr ugha Fks&

blfy, is&fcy jftLVj esa mudk uke vafdr ugha gSA xsV&jftLVj fu;ekuqlkj ,d o"kZ ds fy, j[kk tkrk gS

mlds Ik'pkr u"V dj fn;k tkrk gS&ftldk i`Fkd ls vfHkys[k j[kk tkuk fu;e ds vuqlkj visf{kr ugha gSA

blfy, izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk ds dksbZ vk/kkj fo|eku ugha gSA

20-

foi{kh us l'kiFk dFku djrs gq, okafNr izys[kksa ds laca/k esa ;g dgk gS%

1- xsV&jftLVj 11 ls 14 o"kZ iqjkus gSa& tks ek= 1 o"kZ rd gh lqjf{kr j[ks tkrs gS blfy, izLrqr

ugha fd;s x;sA

2- osru okmplZ izkFkhZx.k ds laca/k esa la/kkfjr gh ugha fd;s x;s D;ksafd os fu;fer vk/kkj ij fu;qDr

ugha FksA Hkqxrku laca/kh izfof"V eLVj jksy ij dh xbZ gS& tks izLrqr fd;s x;s gaSA

3- cSad LVSVesaV izLrqr dj fn;s gSA

4- dk;Z vkoaVu jftLVj& izkFkhZx.k ds fu;fer vk/kkj ij fu;qDr u gksus rFkk izkFkhZx.k dks dksbZ

fof'k"V dk;Z u fn;s tkus ds dkj.k ;g jftLVj la/kkfjr ugha fd;s x;s& izkFkhZx.k dh lsok]

fufonk izLrqr djus ds vk/kkj ij yh xbZ& blfy, izLrqr ugha gq, gSA

5- deZpkfj;ks dh lwph dsoy fu;fer deZpkfj;kas dh j[kh tkrh gS& izkFkhZx.k ds fu;fer deZpkjh u

gksus ls& la/kkfjr ugha dh xbZ o izLrqr ugha gqbZA

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

409

6- Ø; iaftdk dh] mifLFkfr@Hkqxrku ls lqlaxrrk u gksus ls izLrqr ugha fd;k x;k Fkk fdarq

izfrijh{kk esa izkFkhZ ds vkxzg ij izn'kZ MCY;w&17 ds :Ik esa iznf'kZr gqvk gSA foi{kh }kjk izn'kZ

vkj&7 ls vkj&11 rd eLVj jksy izLrqr fd;s x;s gS tks & izkFkhZ dh mifLFkfr ls lacaf/kr gSaA

bu eLVj jksy ds vfrfjDr foi{kh us izn'kZ vkj&5 o vkj&6 mifLFkfr i=d Hkh lk{; esa izLrqr

fd;s gS&ftuesa of.kZr mifLFkfr fooj.k izn'kZ W- 7] W- 10] W- 11] W- 12] W- 15] W- 16] ls

lekurk n'kkZrk gSA ;gh ugha izkFkhZ us vius izfrijh{kk esa izn'kZ vkj&5@3@ vuqyXud&3 esa

of.kZr fooj.k dks Lo;a ls lacaf/kr fooj.k gksuk] o lgh gksuk Lohdkj fd;k gSA

21-

izkFkhZ us vius lk{; esa ;g dgk gS fd mls dke djus dk iSlk pSd ls feyrk FkkA 06-02-2020 dks iqu%

fd;s x;s izfrijh{k.k esa mlus dgk gS fd izn'kZ vkj&7 ls vkj&11 rd eLVj jksy ds vk/kkj ij mls uxn Hkqxrku

gqvk gSA var esa ;g Hkh Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mlls ftrus fnu dke fy;k x;k& mldk Hkqxrku foi{kh us dj fn;k

gSA

22-

foi{kh lk{kh lfPpnkuaUn uk;d us ;|fi viuh izfrijh{kk esa dgk gS fd 2006 ds dksbZ eLVj jksy is'k ugha

fd;s gSaSA pSd ls Hkqxrku ds cSad LVsVesaV is'k fd;s gS tks izn'kZ vkj&13 gS fdarq izkFkhZ dks fd;s Hkqxrku dk mYys[k

blesa ugh gS D;ksafd 17-12-2006 ls cSad LVsVesaV is'k fd;k gSA fdarq cSad LVsVesaV o eLVj jksy iwjs izLrqr u gksus ij

Hkh izn'kZ vkj&5 o vkj&6 esa of.kZr mifLFkfr fooj.k dks izkFkhZx.k }kjk lgh gksuk Lohdkj dj ysus ds dkj.k foi{kh

dh ln~HkkfoDrk ij izfrdwy izHkko ugha iM+rk gSaA ;g mi/kkfjr djuk mfpr ugha gS fd foi{kh us izkFkhZx.k dh

okLrfod mifLFkfr dks Nqikus ds mn~s'; ls dksbZ izys[k izLrqr ugha fd;s gksaA D;ksafd izkFkhZx.k dh mifLFkfr laca/kh

fooj.k ftls izkFkhZ us lgh ekuk gS& vfHkys[k ij miyC/k gSaA

23-

vc izkFkhZ }kjk vius izfrijh{kk esa fd;s x;s dqN egRoiw.kZ dFkuksa ij Hkh blh lanHkZ esa fopkj djuk lqlaxr

gSA

izkFkhZ dgrk gS fd mls dksbZ fu;qfDr i= ugha feykA og Bsds dk vFkZ le>rk gSaSA ch- ,- ikl gSA izn'kZ

MCY;w& 3 dks izkFkhZ us Lo;a ds QksVks o gLrk{kj ;qDr gksuk Lohdkj fd;k gSA og ;g Hkh Lohdkj djrk gS fd mlus

izn'kZ MCY;w& 3 ds ek/;e ls Bsds ij dk;Z djus ds fy, vkosnu izLrqr fd;k gS& mlus o"kZ 2007 esa Hkh Bsds ij

dk;Z djus ds fy, vkosnu fd;k FkkA Bsds ij dk;Z djus ds fy, lHkh ls ¼izkFkhZx.k ls½ vyx& vyx gLrk{kj

djok;s tkrs Fks& tks dke djrs Fks& mldk iSlk fey tkrk FkkA izkFkhZ ds bu dFkuks dks izn'kZ vkj&4 o vkj&5

vkns'k ls iqf"V feyrh gS ftlesa izkFkhZ dks DoksVs'kuksa ds vk/kkj ij nks ekg dh vof/k gsrq 6000@& #- esa dk;Z

djokus dh Lohd`fr tkjh dh xbZ gSA ;g Lohd`fr izkFkhZ ds izkFkZuki= izn'kZ vkj&3 ds vk/kkj ij gS ftlesa izkFkhZ us

dke Bsds ij 6000@& #- esa djus dh lgefr nh o ifjopu fd;k gSA

24-

izkFkhZ ds i{k esa izn'kZ W- 5 }kjk vDrwoj 2006 esa fd;s x;s Bsds ds dk;Z gsrq 1550@& #- Lohd`r fd;s

tkus dk mYys[k gSA blls ;g vkHkkl feyrk gS fd izn'kZ R- 5@1 ls izn'kZ R- 6@5 rd Lohd`r mifLFkfr fooj.k

esa ftl vof/k esa izkFkhZx.k dks dk;Zjr ugha gksuk n'kkZ;k x;k gS& ml vof/k esas izkFkhZx.k us Bsds ij O;fDrxr :Ik ls

le;c} o mn~s'; iwfrZ rd fuf'pr /kujkf'k ij dk;Z fd;k gSA

25-

lk{; dh bl fLFkfr rFkk izkFkhZi{k dh LohdkjksfDr ds vfLrRo esa izkFkhZx.k dh foi{kh }kjk fdlh in ij

fu;qfDr fd;k tkuk izekf.kr ugha gksrk& oju ;g izekf.kr gksrk gS fd izkFkhZx.k us foi{kh ds fy, uewuksa ds inkFkZ dh

dVkbZ] filkbZ] lQkbZ] iSfdax] vkfn dk;Z dks Bsds ij djus ds fy, fuf'pr dk;Z laiknu] fuf'pr vof/k esa]& fu;r

/kujkf'k gsrq djus dh lgefr o Lohd`fr nh gSA Bsds ij dk;Z laiknu ds mijkar tuojh 2007 ls vizsy 2008 dh

vof/k esa izkFkhZx.k us fofHkUu efguksa esa izn'kZ R- 5 o R- 6 esa fn;s x;s fooj.k ds vuq:Ik mifLFkr jgdj dk;Z Hkh

fd;kA lk{; ds bl foospu ls vizkFkhZ o izkFkhZx.k ds e/; fu;kstd o deZdkj dk laca/k LFkkfir gksuk izekf.kr ugha

gksrk gSA

26-

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls fu.kZ; fd'ku flag cuke ,Dth- bathfu;j esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g vf/ker fn;k

gS fd tc nSfud osru Hkksxh dks fu;fer in ds fo:} fu;qDr fd;k gks& rks lsok lekfIr ds iwoZ vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk

25 ¼,Q½s ds izko/kkuksa dk vuqikyu vko';d gSa

27-

Mk;jsDVj fQ'kjht VfeZuy fMohtu cuke Hkhdw HkkbZ es?kkth HkkbZ pkoM+k ds fu.kZ; esa eku- mPpre

U;k;ky; us ;g ekxZn'kZu fn;k gS fd /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½s vf/kfu;e ds lanHkZ esa 240 fnu dh yxkrkj lsok izekf.kr djus

gsrq ,d nSfud osru Hkksxh ls leLr mifLFkfr vfHkys[k izLrqr djus dh vis{kk mfpr ugha gSA deZdkj us tc ;g

nkok fd;k gks fd mlus 240 fnu dk;Z fd;k gS rks& fu;kstd ij ;g flf}Hkkj varfjr gks tkrk gS fd og deZdkj

}kjk 240 fnu lsok iw.kZ u djuk izekf.kr djsA

28-

gLrxr izdj.kksa esa izkFkhZx.k }kjk Bsds ij dk;Z djuk o foi{kh }kjk izLrqr mifLFkfr fooj.k dks Lohdkj

dj ysus dh fLFkfr esa bu fu.kZ;ksa esa izfrikfnr fof/k rF;kRed fHkUurk ds dkj.k izkFkhZx.k ds izfr lgk;d ugha gSA

29-

vkj- ,e- ;sykrh cuke vfl- ,DthD;wfVo bathfu;j ds fu.kZ; esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g izfrikfnr

fd;k gS fd 240 fnu lrr lsok djus ds rF; dks izekf.kr djus dk izkFkfed flf}Hkkj oknh@ izkFkhZ ij gh gS& ;g

nkf;Ro oknh }kjk Lohdk;Z lk{; ¼ekSf[kd o izys[kh;½ izLrqr djds mUeksfpr fd;k tkrk gSA nSfud osru Hkksxh

410 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Jfed ;fn fu;kstd ls mifLFkfr o osru Hkqxrku dk vfHkys[k izLrqr djokus dk fuosnu djsa& vkSj fu;kstd izLrqr

u djs& rks fu;kstd ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk djus dk fofu'p; izR;sd ekeys ds rF;ksa ij fuHkZj gksxkA gLrxr

izdj.kksa dh mi;qZDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds izdk'k esa foi{kh ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk fd;s tkus dk dksbZ vk/kkj fo|eku

ugha gSA rFkk ;g fu.kZ;t fof/k izkFkhZ ds i{k esa lgk;d ugha gSA

30-

fizalhiy Mwaxj dkWayst chdkusj cuke vkseizdk'k esa eku- jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us dgk gS fd deZdkj

tc 240 fnu dh yxkrkj lsok ,d dsys.Mj o"kZ esa iwoZ djus dk nkok djsa ,oa fu;kstd us bl rF; dk okXNy&

iw.kZ [kaMu fd;k gks& rks mls fu;kstd dh Lohd`fr le>k tkosaA

31-

ch- Mh- vks- izkxiqj cuke ;ksfxaUnj dqekj o vU; esa eku- fgekpy izns'k mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fof/k Hkh

rF;kRed fHkUurk ds dkj.k izkFkhZx.k ds izfr lgk;d ugha gSA

32-

blds foijhr foi{kh dh vksj ls ,e- ih- bysfDVªflVh cksMZ cuke gfjjke o lqjsUnz uxj fMfLVªDV iapk;r

cuke Mk;k HkkbZ vejflag ds ekeysa esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vf/ker dk voyEc fy;k x;k gSA bl

fu.kZ; esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd lsok lekfIr ds iwoZorhZ ,d dsys.Mj o"kZ esa 240 fnu

yxkrkj dk;Z djus ds rF; dk flf}Hkkj deZdkj ij gh gSA tc deZdkj bl rF; dks izekf.kr djus gsrq dksbZ lk{;

izLrqr u djs rFkk fu;kstd }kjk eLVj jksy izLrqr djus ij mudk [ka.Mu Hkh u djs& rks ;g dgk tkuk pkfg;s fd

deZdkj us flf}Hkkj dk mUekspu ugha fd;k gSA U;k;ky; dks fu;kstd ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk rc gh djuk

pkfg;s tc okafNr lk{; dk vfLrRo esa gksuk deZdkj izekf.kr djs] ftls izLrqr fd;k tk ldrk gksA Je U;k;ky;

ds le{k tkWp dk ifj{ks= lsok lekfIr ds iwoZorhZ 12 eghuksa rd gh lhfer gS& blh vof/k dks ijhf{kr dj og

fu/kkZfjr djsxk fd deZdkj dks vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ dk laj{k.k ns; gS vFkok ughaA bu fu.kZ;ksa esa ikfjr fof/k

ls ;g Li"V ekxZn'kZu izkIr gksrk gS fd izkFkhZx.k }kjk xsV jftLVj ds izLrqrhdj.k dh ekWx djus ij mlds u"V gks

tkus dk l'kiFk dFku vizkFkhZ }kjk fd;k x;k gS] blfy, ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk gS fd vizkFkhZ us fdlh izys[k ds

vfLrRo esa gksrs gq, Hkh tkuow> dj] izyf{kr mn~s'; ls mls izLrqr ugha fd;k gksA blds vfrfjDr ;g Hkh egRoiw.kZ gS

fd vizkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr mifLFkfr& fooj.k izn'kZ vkj& 5@1 ls vkj& 6@5 o eLVj jksy izn'kZ vkj& 7 ls vkj&

11 rd dks izkFkhZx.k us Lohdkj djrs gq, fo[kafMr ugha fd;k gSA blfy, vizkFkhZ ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk fd;k

tkuk U;k;ksfpr o fof/klEer ugha gSA

33-

foi{kh us ,e- ih- bysfDVªflVh cksMZ cuke gfjjke ds fu.kZ; esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fof/k dk

voyac ysdj ;g Hkh dgk gS fd izkFkhZx.k dk dk;Z vLFkkbZ o vko';drk tfur Fkk& ftls vko';drk u gksus ij

can Hkh fd;k x;k FkkA bl rF; dh iqf"V lk{kh fouksn dqekj lh- ds- ds dFkuksa ls gqbZ gSaA bl fu.kZ; esa eku-

mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g ekxZn'kZu fn;k gS fd lhfer dk;Z ds fy, LFkkuh; O;fDr;ksa dks fn;k x;k fu;kstu& lrr

o fu;fer dk;Z gsrq ugha le>k tk ldrk gSA tc eLVj jksy ls Hkh ;g izdV gks fd fu;fer varjky ij Jfed ls

dk;Z fy;k x;k gS] ;g izekf.kr ugha gksrk gS fd fu;kstd dks ml dk;Z dh lrr vko';drk jgh gksA vizkFkhZ }kjk

izLrqr mifLFkfr fooj.k o eLVj jksy ds voyksdu ls Hkh izkFkhZx.k ls djok;k x;k dk;Z lrr izd`fr dk izekf.kr

ugha gqvk gS& D;ksafd mifLFkfr fooj.k esa izR;sd ekg esa fy;k x;k dk;Z] varjky lfgr gSA

34-

izkFkhZx.k dk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k ls Bsdk& Jfed ds :Ik esa dk;Z ;fn fy;k x;k gS rks vizkFkhZ ds

ikl mDr mn~s'; gsrq vuqKki= gksuk vko';d Fkk& ftldk u gksuk vizkFkhZ us Lohdkj fd;k gS& blfy, izkFkhZx.k

dks vizkFkhZ }kjk fu;qDr gh ekuk tkosaA foi{kh us bl laca/k esa fdlh vuqKki= dh vko';drk u gksuk dg dj rdZ

dk fojks/k fd;k gSA rdZ ij fopkj fd;k x;kA

35-

Bsdk Jfed ¼fofu;eu ,oa mUewyu½ vf/kfu;e 1970 dh /kkjk 1 ds vUrZxr vf/kfu;e ds izko/kkuksa ds

foLrkj dk mica/k fd;k x;k gSA bl vf/kfu;e dh mi/kkjk 1 ¼4½ (a) ds vuqlkj izR;sd ,slk LFkkiu@laLFkku tgkW

chl ;k mlls vf/kd deZdkj fu;ksftr gksa ;k foxr ckjg eghuksa ds nkSjku fdlh fnu fu;ksftr jgs gks& ij gh

vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku iz;ksT; gksxsaA bu izdj.kksa esa izkFkhZx.k us ,slh dksbZ lk{; izLrqr ugha dh gS ftlls vizkFkhZ ds

v/khu chl ;k mlls vf/kd deZdkjksa dk fu;ksftr gksuk izekf.kr gksrk gksA blfy, izkFkhZx.k dk ;g rdZ lkjoku

ugha gSA

36-

mi;ZqDr foospu ls ;g Li"V :Ik ls izekf.kr gS fd izkFkhZx.k lsok lekfIr dh frfFk 29-04-2008 ls iwoZorhZ

,d dsys.Mj o"kZ dh vof/k esa vizkFkhZ ds fu;kstu esa 240 fnu yxkrkj dk;Z djus dk rF; izekf.kr djus esa foQy

jgs gSa& blfy, vizkFkhZ }kjk izkFkhZx.k dh NVuh 30-04-2008 ls fd;k tkuk Hkh Lo;a gh izekf.kr ugha gksrk gSA

ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa ds varxZr fdlh izdkj dk laj{k.k izkIr djus ds

vf/kdkjh izekf.kr ugha gq, gSA vr% ;g fopkj.kh; fcanq izkFkhZx.k ds fo:} fu.khZr fd;k tkrk gSA

37-

foi{kh us ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mUgksaus izkFkhZx.k dks vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa ds varxZr

dksbZ uksfVl ugha fn;k u gh uksfVl osru o {kfriwfrZ dk Hkqxrku fd;k& D;ksafd uksfVl LFkkbZ deZpkfj;ksa dks fn;k

tkrk gS rFkk izkFkhZx.k Lo;a gh dke NksM+ dj pys tkrs FksA fcanq la- 2 ds fofu'p; ds izdk'k esa izkFkhZx.k dks pawfd

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

411

vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa dk laj{k.k izkIr ugha gqvk gS] blfy, bu izko/kkuks dh ikyuk fd;s tkus

dh ck/;rk vizkFkhZ dks ugha Fkh& vr% ;g fcanq izkFkhZx.k ds fo:} fu.khZr fd;k tkrk gSA

38-

bl fcanq ds laca/k esa izkFkhZ us vius dFku esa dgk gS fd vizkFkhZ }kjk dksbZ ofj"Brk lwph ugh cukbZ og tks

dk;Z djrk Fkk& mls vU; Jfeadks ls djok;k tk jgk gSA ;g mYys[kuh; gS fd izkFkhZ us vius vfHkopukas ;k lk{;

esa mu O;fDr;ksa dk uke Hkh of.kZr ugha fd;k gS ftUgsa izkFkhZ dks lsokeqDr djus ds mijkar dfu"B gksus ij Hkh lsok esa

j[kk x;k gksA

39-

foi{kh us vius lk{; esa dgk gS fd izkFkhZ ds dk;Z NksM+dj pys tkus ds okn mDr dk;Z dh lekfIr ij

fdlh vU; Jfed dks dk;Z ij ugha yxk;k x;k gS rFkk fdlh dfu"B Jfed dks fu;qfDr ugha nh xbZ gSA izfrijh{kk

esa ;g Hkh dgk gS fd orZeku esa Bsds ij tks Jfed dk;Zjr gS os ml dk;Z ls layXu ugha gS ftl ij izkFkhZ dk;Zjr

jgk gSA orZeku Jfedksa dh dk;Z dh izd`fr orZeku deZpkjh ls fHkUu gSaA

40-

izkFkhZ dh izfr ijh{kk esa mlus Lohdkj fd;k gS fd izn'kZ vkj& 12 lwph esa mldk uke ugha gS D;ksafd og

LFkkbZ deZpkfj;ksa dh lwph gSA foi{kh dk ;g Hkh lk{; gS fd pWwfd izkFkhZ fu;fer deZpkjh ugha Fkk blfy, is fcy

jftLVj esa mldk uke ugha gSA izkFkhZ dk uke rks ekLVj jksy esa gh vafdr gksrk FkkA

41-

fcanq la- 2 ds fofu'p; ls ;g LFkkfir gks pqdk gS fd vizkFkhZ }kjk izkFkhZx.k dks fdlh LFkkbZ ;k fu;fer

in ij fu;qfDr ugha nh xbZ Fkh& oju izkFkhZx.k dks dk;Z dh vko';drk gsrq vLFkkbZ :Ik ls lafonk ds vk/kkj ij

fuf'pr jkf'k ds Hkqxrku ij j[kk FkkA ,sls Jfedksa dh dksbZ ofj"Brk lwph dk la/kkj.k fd;k tkuk foi{kh ds fy,

ck/;dkjh ugha gSA

42-

eku- mPpre U;k;ky; us lqjsUnz uxj fMfLVªDV iapk;r cuke Mk;k HkkbZ vejflag ds fu.kZ; esa leku rF;ksa

ij fopkj djrs gq, ;g dgk gS fd fu;fer fu;kstu ds vHkko esa ofj"Brk lwph dk la/kkj.k fu;kstd ls visf{kr ugha

Fkk& nSfud osru Hkksxh Jfedksa dh ofj"Brk lwph dk la/kkj.k fof/kd vis{kk ugha gSA bl foospu ds mijkar ;g fcanq

izkFkhZ ds fo:} fu.khZr fd;k tkrk gSA

fopkj.kh; fcanqvksa ij izkIr foosfpr fu"d"kZ ds vk/kkj ij vizkFkhZ laLFkku ;|fi m|ksx dh ifjHkk"kk ds

vUrxZr vkuk izekf.kr gqvk gS fdarq lk{; ds v/kkj ij vizkFkhZ }kjk izkFkhZx.k dh NVuh fd;k tkuk izekf.kr ugh

gqvk gS& blfy, vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa dk laj{k.k izkFkhZx.k dks miyC/k ugha gSA vizkFkhZ }kjk

izkFkhZ ls fdlh dfu"Brj O;fDr dks lsok esa j[kk tkuk fl) ugha gqvk gS&bl izdkj izkFkhZx.k vf/kfu;e ds varxZr

fdlh Hkh izko/kku dk laj{k.k ikus dks vf/kdkjoku izekf.kr ugha gq, gSA blfy, izkFkhZx.k vizkFkhZ ds fo:} dksbZ

vuqrks"k ikus ds vf/kdkjh ugha gSA

vr% izkFkhZx.k& vizkFkhZ laLFkku ds fo:} dksbZ vuqrks"k izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh ugha gSa& vf/kfu.kZ; blh

izdkj ikfjr fd;k tkrk gSA vf/kfu.kZ; dh izfr izR;sd vkS|ksfxd fookn i=koyh esa layXu dh tkos rFkk iapkV dh

izfrfyfi vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 dh /kkjk 17 ¼1½ ds vuqlj.k esa izdk'kukFkZ izsf"kr dh tkosaA

iapkV vkt fnukad 29 fnlEcj 2020 dks fy[kk o gLrk{kfjr fd;k x;kA

jk/kk eksgu prqosZnh] ihBklhu vf/kdkjh

नई दिल् ली, 3 फरवरी, 2021

का.आ. 154

—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्री

सरकार ijek.kq [kfut vUos"k.k ,oa vuqla/kku funs'kky;] if'pe {ks=] ijek.kq mtkZ foHkkx] ि ृुर (राि) के

प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री राकेि कुमार उृाध् ा , कामगार के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्ििष्ट औद्योजगक जववाि

में केन्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण- सि- श्रम न् ा ाल , ि ृुर के ृंचाट (संिभि सं्‍ ा 26/2011) को िजसा

दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज, प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्री सरकार को 03.02.2021 को प्राप्त हुआ ा।

[सं. एल-14012/5/2009-आईआर (डी ू)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

412 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 3rd February, 2021

S.O. 154.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 26/2011) of the Central Government Industrial-Tribunal-cum

Labour Court Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

The Atomic Mineral Directorate for Exploration and Research, Department of Atomic Energy, Jaipur (raj) and

Shri Rakesh Kumar Upadhyay, Worker which was received by the Central Government on 03.02.2021.

[No. L-14012/5/2009 IR (DU)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

jk/kk eksgu prqosZnh

ihBklhu vf/kdkjh

ReferenceNo.L-14012/5/2009-IR(DU) Dated:13.7.2011

Jh jkds'k dqekj mik/;k; iq= Jh gjh fd'ku 'kekZ fuoklh lsDVj&8] 82@271 psrd ekxZ izrki uxj] lkaxkusj]

t;iqjA

ijek.kq [kkfut vUos"k.k ,oa vuqla/kku funs'kky; if'pe {ks=]

ijek.kq mtkZ foHkkx] Hkkjr ljdkj ,- ,e- Mh- dEiysDl- lsDVj&5]

foLrkj izrki uxj lkaxkusj] t;iqj& }kjk funs'kd

---vizkFkhZ@foi{kh

izkFkhZx.k dh rjQ ls % Jh dq.kky jkor vf/koDrk

vizkFkhZx.k dh rjQ ls % Jh nsos'k dqekj caly vf/koDrk

fnukad % 29-12-2020

1-

Je ,oa fu;kstu ea=ky; Hkkjr ljdkj ubZ fnYyh }kjk fnukad 13-07-2011 dks vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e

1947 ¼ftls vkxs ek= vf/kfu;e dgk tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 10 ¼1½ ¼Mh½ ds vUrxZr iznRr 'kfDr;ks ds vuqlj.k esa

mi;qZDr ikaWapksa izkFkhZx.k ds laEc/k esa fuEukafdr ¼lesfdr :i esa½ fookn U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq bl vf/kdj.k dks lanfHkZr

fd;s x;s %&

“Whether the action of the Management of Atomic Mineral Directorate for Exploration and Research,

Department of Atomic Energy, Jaipur in terminating the services of (1) Sh. Shri Ram Sharma s/o

Shri Lallu Lal Sharma, (2) Shri Dhanna Lal s/o Shri Jagdish Bairwa, (3) Shri Rakesh Kumar Upadhyay

s/o Shri Hari Kishan Sharma, (4) Shri Chhagan Lal Dhanka s/o Shri Gulab Chand Dhanka and (5)

Shri Manoj Kumar Pipliwal s/o Shri kanhaiya Lal Pipliwal. w.e.f. 30.04.2008 is legal and justified?

What relief the workmen are entitled to? ’’

2-

mi;qZDr ikWapksa fookn bl vf/kdj.k dks izkIr gksus ij mHk;i{k dks vkgwr djrs gq,& izkFkhZx.k dks funsZ'k

fn;k x;k fd os vius nkos dk vfHkdFku izLrqr djasA rnqijkar izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls fnukad 04-10-2011 dks nkos ds

vfHkdFku izLrqr fd;s x;sA izkFkhZx.k ds dFku la{ksi esa bl izdkj of.kZr gSaA izkFkhZx.k dks 05-07-2005 ls 10-01-2006

ds e/; fofHkUu frfFk;ksa ij prqFkZ Js.kh ¼gsYij rduhdh lgk;d½ ds in ij vizkFkhZ }kjk fu;qDr fd;k x;kA

izkFkhZx.k iRFkj ds uewuksa dh filkbZ] NukbZ] f?klkbZ o vU; dk;kZy;h dk;Z vizkFkhZ ds vf/kdkfj;kas ds fn'kk funsZ'k ij

djrs FksA vizkFkhZ laLFkku m|ksx dh ifjHkk"kk esa vkrk gSaA izkFkhZx.k dks vizkFkhZ us fnukad 30-04-2008 dks voS/k :Ik ls

lsok eqDr dj fn;kA

3-

izkFkhZx.k o vizkFkhZ ds e/; fu;kstd&deZdkj ds laca/k FksA izkFkhZx.k dh lsok eqfDr ls iwoZ /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½

vf/kfu;e ds vuqlkj uksfVl@uksfVl osru o {kfriwfrZ jkf'k dk Hkqxrku izkFkhZx.k dks ugha fd;k x;kA izkFkhZx.k ls tks

dk;Z djok;k tk jgk Fkk og LFkkbZ izd`fr dk Fkk o vkt Hkh vU; Jfedkas ls djok;k tk jgk gSA izkFkhZx.k us 240

fnu ls vf/kd fnuksa rd yxkrkj dk;Z fd;k gSA vizkFkhZ us Jfedksa dh ofj"Brk lwph ugha cukbZ u gh dksbZ ?kjsyw

tkWap dh& rFkk vuqfpr Je O;ogkj fd;kA bl izdkj /kkjk 25] ¼,Q½@ ¼th½@ ¼,p½ vf/kfu;e o fu;e 77 o 78

ds izko/kkuks dk mYya?ku fd;k gSA izkFkhZx.k lsok eqfDr ds Ik'pkr ls csjkstxkj gaSA vr% fnukad 30-04-2008 dks dh

xbZ izkFkhZx.k dh lsok lekfIr dks voS| ?kksf"kr djrs gq, izkFkhZx.k dks foxr osru o ifjykHkksa lfgr lsok esa cgky

fd;k tkosA

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

413

4-

vizkFkhZ@foi{kh us fnukad 04-07-2012 dks ikWapks izdj.kksa esa oknksÙkj izLrqr djrs gq, ;g dgk gSa fd izkFkhZx.k

dks fdlh in ij fu;qfDr ugha nh xbZ] cfYd vko';d dk;Z djus ds fy, vkdfLed Jfed ds :Ik esa va'kdkyhu

lafonk ds vk/kkj ij j[kk x;k FkkA blfy, lsok eqfDr dk iz'u gh mRiUu ugha gksrk gSA vizkFkhZ m|ksx dh Js.kh esa

ugha vkrk gSA izkFkhZx.k dks dk;Z miyC/krk ij tkjh fufonk o fu/kkZfjr ctV esa dk;Z lEiUu djus gsrq j[kk tkus ls

,slh fu;qfDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2 ¼vks vks½s ¼ch ch½ ds vUrZxr vkrh gS o /kkjk 25&,Q ds izko/kku vkd`"V gh ughs

gksrs gSaA izkFkhZx.k ,d o"kZ esa 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z djuk izekf.kr ugha dj ik;s gSaA vizkFkhZ }kjk vf/kfu;e o

fu;eksa dh vogsyuk ugha dh xbZ gS u gh dksbZ vuqfpr Je vH;kl fd;k x;k gSaA fdlh vU; Jfed dks dk;Z gsrq

ugha yxk;k x;k gSA vr% okn vLohdkj fd;s tkosaA

5-

izkFkhZx.k us 24-09-2012 dks oknksRrj dk [kaMu djrs gq, vfrfjDr dFku Hkh izLrqr fd;s gSa&vkSj iqu% nkos

ds vfHkdFkuksa dks Lohdkj djus dk fuosnu fd;k gSaA

6-

mi;qZDr ikWapksa fookn izdj.kksa esa izkFkhZx.k ds vfHkdFku o oknksRrj leku gSa rFkk izkFkhZx.k dh lsok dh

izd`fr o lsok lekfIr dh frfFk Hkh leku gh gSaA blfy, bu ikWapksa fooknks esa mRiUu fooknfcanq leku gksus ls bu

fooknksa dk vf/kfu.kZ;u ,dhd`r :Ik ls mHk;i{k dh lgefr ls fd;k tk jgk gSaA

7-

izkFkhZx.k us vius vius nkos ds vfHkdFku ds leZFku gsrq lk{; esa Lo;a izkFkhZ ,- M-& 1 Jh jke 'ekZ]

Jh /kUuk yky] Jh jkds'k dqekj mik/;k;] Jh Nxu yky /kkudk ,oa Jh eukst dqekj ihiyhoky dks ijhf{kr fd;k

gSA izys[kh; lk{; esa izn'kZ 1 ls 17 rd izys[kkas dks Jh jke 'kekZ ls lacaf/kr izdj.k esa iznf'kZr fd;k gSA pwafd bu

ikWapksa gh izdj.kksa esa okndkj.k] i{kdkj o lk{; dh izd`fr leku gS& mHk;i{k dh lgefr ls fookn la- 24@2011

Jh jke 'kekZ cuke funs'kd] ijek.kq [kkfut vUos"k.k ,oa vuqla/kku esa mHk;i{k }kjk izLrqr lk{; dks gh ikWapksa fooknks

ds laca/k esa izHkkoh ekudj foospu gsrq xzg.k fd;k tk jgk gSA

blh Øe esa foi{kh@vizkFkhZ us vius lk{; esa ,u- ,- M- 1 fouksn dqekj lh- ds- ¼lgk- dkfeZd vf/kdkjh½ dks ijh{kr

fd;k o izn'kZ vkj&1 ls vkj&6 izys[kksa dks iznf'kZr fd;k gSA

8-

fnukad 22-12-2017 dks bl vf/kdj.k }kjk ikWapksa fooknksa esa vf/kfu.kZ; ikfjr dj izkFkhZx.k dks dksbZ vuqrks"k

ikus dk vf/kdkjh ugha ekurs gq, nkoksa dks fujLr dj fn;k x;kA bl vf/kfu.kZ; ds fo:} izkFkhZx.k us eku- mPp

U;k;ky; esa fjV ;kfpdk izLrqr dhA eku- jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us fnukad 28-08-2019 dks fu.kZ; ikfjr djrs gq,

fjV ;kfpdk Lohdkj dj vf/kfu.kZ; fnukad 22-12-2017 dks vikLr dj fn;k rFkk ekeys bl vf/kdj.k dks iqu%

fofuf'pr djus gsrq izfrizsf"kr dj fn;sA eku- mPp U;k;ky; es ;g funsZ'k fn;k fd izkFkhZx.k }kjk ,usDlj&1

¼izkFkZuki= fnukad 27-11-2012½ ds ek/;e ls visf{kr izys[kksa dk]s tks foi{kh ds ikl miyC/k gS Je U;k;ky; ds le{k

izLrqr fd;k tkosa&rFkk izkFkhZx.k dks bu vfHkys[kksa dks ijhf{kr djus rFkk vius i{k dks LFkkfir djus dk leqfpr

volj fn;k tkosA

bl fu.kZ; ds vuqlj.k esa foi{kh dks izys[kksa ds izLrqrhdj.k dk funsZ'k fn;k x;k rFkk izLrqfrdj.k ds

mijkUr mHk;i{k dks vfrfjDr lk{; izLrqr djus dk volj Hkh fn;k x;kA izkFkhZ us vius lk{; esa iqu% ,- M- 1

Jh jke 'kekZ dks ijhf{kr fd;k rFkk vfrfjDr izys[kh lk{; esa izn'kZ W 17 iznf'kZr fd;kA foi{kh@vizkFkhZ us

vfrfjDr lk{; esa ,u- ,- M- 2 lfPpnkuaUn uk;d mi{ks=h; funs'kd o ,u- ,- M- 3 y[ku yky 'kekZ dks ijhf{kr

fd;k o izys[kh; lk{; esa izn'kZ vkj 7 ls vkj 13 rd izys[k iznf'kZr fd;sA

9-

fnukad 03-11-2020 ls 09-12-2020 rd fofHkUu frfFk;ksa ij mHk;i{k ds rdZ&forZd lqus x;s o miyC/k lk{;

dk ifj'khyu fd;k x;kA

10-

izkFkhZx.k ds vfHkHkk"kd dk ;g izeq[k rdZ gS fd ,usDlj&1 izkFkZuki= fnukad 27-11-2012 esa of.kZr o okafNr

izys[kksa dks vizkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr gh ugha fd;k x;k gS & u gh izLrqr u djus dk djus dk dksbZ larqf"Vizn dkj.k

izLrqr fd;k gSA blfy, vizkFkhZ ds fo:} ;g izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk dh tkos fd ;fn og izkfFkZr vfHkys[kksa dks izLrqr

djrs rks izkFkhZx.k dk foi{kh ds v/khu fu;fer 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Zjr jgus dk rF; izekf.kr gks tkrkA vizkFkhZ

us vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼Mh½ dh ikyuk u djrs gq, mifLFkfr dk dksbZ vfHkys[k la/kkfjr ugha fd;kA tks izys[k

foi{kh us u"V gks tkus ds dkj.k izLrqr ugha dj ikuk dgk gS muds u"V djus laca/kh dksbZ lk{; izLrqr gh ugha dh

gSaA lk{kh Jhjke 'kekZ ds iwoZorhZ 'kiFki= esa fu;qfDr frfFk 06-07-2005 =qfV o'k vafdr gks xbZ gS ftls 06-07-2006 gh

i<+k tkos tks Ik'pkrorhZ vfrfjDr lk{; 'kiFki= esa vfdr gSA vfHkys[kksa dks u"V djus dk dksbZ izek.k gh ugha gSA

foi{kh lk{kh y[ku yky Lohdkj djrk gS fd xsV jftLVj esa izfof"V fd;s fcuk dksbZ vUnj ugh tk ldrk gSA fdarq

ogh xsV jftLVj foi{kh us is'k ugh fd;k gSA Bsdsnkj }kjk fu;qfDr dk rdZ foi{kh us fn;k gS fdarq Bsdsnkj dk dksbZ

ykbZlsal izLrqr gh ugh fd;k gSaA vr% izkFkhZx.k ds nkoksa dks Lohdkj dj izkfFkZr vuqrks"k iznku fd;k tkosA mUgksaus

vius rdksZ ds leZFku esa fuEukafdr U;kf;d n`"Vkar izLrqr fd;s%

1- cSaxyksj okVj lIykbZ ,aM lhojst cksMZ cuke vkj- jktIik o vU; 1978 ,- vkbZ- vkj- 548

2- fd'ku flag cuke ,fDtfDVo bath- gfj;k.kk LVsV ,xzh- ekdsZfVax cksMZ ,- vkbZ- vkj- 2010 lq- dksVZ] ¼lIyh-½

787

414 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

3- Mk;jsDVj fQ'kjht VfeZuy fMohtu cuke Hkhdw HkkbZ es?kkth HkkbZ pkoM+k ,- vkbZ- vkj- 2010 lq- dksVZ] 1236

4- vkj- ,e- ;sykrh cuke vfl- ,DthD;wfVo bathfu;j flfoy vihy la- 5124@2004 fu.kZ;& 07-11-2005-

5- esfduksu eSadth fy- cuke esfduksu ,EiykbZt ;wfu;u flfoy vihy la- 5319@2008 lq- dksVZ] fu.kZ;&

25-02-2015-

6- fizalhiy Mwaxj dkWayst chdkusj cuke vkseizdk'k 1999 ysc- vkbZ- lh- 97 ¼jktLFkku½

7- ch- Mh- vks- izkxiqj cuke ;ksfxaUnj dqekj 2008 ¼118½ ,Q- ,y- vkj- 460 ¼fg- izns'k½

11-

vizkFkhZ ds vfHkHkk"kd dk ;g izeq[k rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k us vius iq"V lk{; ls ;g izekf.kr gh ugha fd;k gS

fd mUgksaus vizkFkhZ ds v/khu 240 fnu ls vf/kd&,d o"kZ dh vof/k esa dk;Z fd;k tcfd ;g fl}hHkkj izkFkhZx.k ij

gh vkjksfir gSA izkFkhZ Jhjke 'kekZ ¼o vU; izkFkhZx.k½ us Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mUgsa dksbZ fu;qfDr i= ugha feyk gS u gh

dksbZ vkosnu fu;qfDr gsrq fn;kA o"kZ 2005 ls 2008 rd ,d o"kZ esa fdrus fdrus fnu dk;Z fd;k ;g Hkh ;kn ugha

gSA izn'kZ W- 3 o W- 7 dk mYys[k djrs gq, mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ us Bsds ij dk;Z djus gsrq vkosnu fd;k

gSA izkFkhZx.k us ;g Hkh Lohdkj fd;k gS fd vuqyXud&3 ¼Ex. R/5½ mlls lacaf/kr gS rFkk blesa vfdar dk;Z fnol

lgh gS izn'kZ W- 10 ls W- 12 mlds Hkqxrku ls lacaf/kr gSA LohdkjksfDr ds mijkaUr fdlh izek.k dh vko';drk

'ks"k ugha jgrh gSA lk{; dh bl fLFkfr esa izkFkhZx.k dk ;g vk{ksi Lohdk;Z ugha gSa fd vizkFkhZ us mifLFkfr vfHkys[k

dk la/kkj.k ugha fd;k vFkok izLrqr ugha fd;k gSaS blfy, vizkFkhZ ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk dk dksbZ vk/kkj ugha

gSA izkFkhZ dks lafonk ds vk/kkj ij dk;Z djus gsrq fu;r mn~s'; ls j[kk x;k Fkk blfy, Hkh os vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25

¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa dk laj{k.k ugh ik ldrs gaSA vizkFkhZ vUos"k.k ,oa vuqla/kku ds dk;Z ls lac} gS tks m|ksx dh

ifjHkk"kk esa ugha vkrk gSA vr% okn vLohdkj fd;s tkosaA mUgksus vius rdZ ds leZFku esa fuEukafdr U;kf;d n`"Vkar

o vfHkys[k la/kkj.k vof/k dh foHkkxh; rkfydk dh izfr izLrqr dh gS%

1- lqjsUnz uxj fMfLVªDV iapk;r cuke Mk;k HkkbZ vejflag flfoy vihy la- 6511@2005 fu.kZ; 25-10-2005

¼lqizhe dksVZ½A

2- ,e- ih- bysfDVªflVh cksMZ cuke gfjjke flfoy vihy la- 2240@2001 fu.kZ; 27-09-2004 ¼lqizhe dksVZ½A

3- LVsV vkWaQ xqtjkr cuke izre flag ujflag ijekj ¼2001½ 9 lqizhe dksVZ dslst 713A

12-

mHk;i{k ds rdksZ] lk{; ,oa U;kf;d n`"Vkarks esa ikfjr fof/k ij lE;d fopkj djus ds mijkaUr bu fooknksa esa

fuEukafdr fookn fcanq& U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq mRiUu gq, gSa%

1- D;k vizkFkhZ@foi{kh] vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2 ¼j½ ds vFkkZUrxZr m|ksx gS\

---izkFkhZx.k

2- D;k izkFkhZx.k dks vizkFkhZ }kjk prqFkZ Js.kh ¼gsYij rduhdh lgk;d½ ds in ij tqykbZ 2005 ls tqykbZ 2006

ds e/; fu;qDr fd;k x;k rFkk izkFkhZx.k us vizkFkhZ ds v/khu 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z ,d dsys.Mj& o"kZ esa

fd;k gS\

---izkFkhZx.k

3- D;k foi{kh }kjk izkFkhZx.k dh lsok lekfIr ds iwoZ vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkukas dk vuqikyu

ugha fd;k x;k\

---izkFkhZx.k

4- D;k foi{kh }kjk deZdkjksa dh ofj"Brk lwph ugha cukbZ xbZ ,oa izkFkhZx.k dh lsok lekIr djus ds mijkaUr

izkFkhZx.k ls dfu"Brj O;fDr;ksa dks lsok esa j[kk x;k\

---izkFkhZx.k

5- vuqrks"k\

mHk;i{k ds rdksZ lk{; ,oa fof/k ij fopkj ds mijkaUr izR;sd fopkj.kh; fcUnq ij fofu'p; bl izdkj gS%

13-

izkFkhZx.k dk ;g dFku gS fd vizkFkhZ laLFkku dh tks xfrfof/k;kWa gSa] og m|ksx dh ifjHkk"kk esa vkrh gSaA

iRFkj ds uewuksa ds ijh{k.k ls ;wjsfu;e dh igpku gksrh Fkh] mlh ds vk/kkj ij ;wjsfu;e dk mRiknu gksrk FkkA blds

foijhr foi{kh dk ;g rdZ gS fd vizkFkhZ ijek.kq [kfut] vUos"k.k o vuqla/kku ds dk;Z esa jr gS tks m|ksx dh

ifjHkk"kk esa ugha vkrk gSA

14-

bl lUnHkZ esa foi{kh lk{kh fouksn dqekj lh- ds- dk izfrijh{kk esa fd;k x;k ;g dFku egRoiw.kZ gS fd

uewuksa ds ijh{k.k ls ;g irk pyrk gS fd inkFkZ ;wjsfu;e gS vFkok ugha\ ;fn ;wjsfu;e gksrk gS rks mldk mi;ksx

ijek.kq la;a= esa fo|qr mRiknu esa iz;ksx fd;k tkrk gSA bl izdkj mRikfnr fo|qr miHkksDrkvksa iz;ksx esa vkrh gSA

bl leLr izfØ;k esa ekuo ,oa e'khu dk iz;ksx gksrk gSA bl dFku ls ;g mi/kkj.kk ljyrk ls dh tk ldrh gS

fd mRikfnr fo|qr ds miHkksDrkvksa dks foØ; ls izfrQy Lo:i /kujkf'k izkIr gksrh gh gSA vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2 ¼j½

ds vUrZxr ßm|ksxÞ ls fu;kstdksa dk dksbZ dkjckj] O;olk;] miØe] fofuekZ.k ;k vkthfodk vfHkizsr gSaA izkFkhZx.k dh

vksj ls izLrqr fu.kZ; cSaxyksj okVj lIykbZ ,aM lhojst cksMZ cuke vkj- jktIik esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; us dfri;

egRoiw.kZ fn'kk funsZ'k izfrikfnr fd;s gS&rnquqlkj tgkWa dk;Zdykiks ds lapkyu gsrq ra=kRed O;oLFkk tks fu;kstd o

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

415

deZdkjksa ds lgdkj ls laxfBr gks] ftlesa lh/kk o lkjoku rRo O;olkf;d gks] tks ekuo mi;ksx ;k lsokFkZ mRiknu

o mlds forj.k ls lacaf/kr gks& ,slk midze Þm|ksxß gksrk gSA

15-

bl laca/k esa ykHk] gsrqd ;k ykHkkFkZ mn~s'; dh vuqifLFkfr vlaxr gksrh gS rFkk fu;kstd& fu;ksftr ds

e/; laca/kijd dk;Zdyki ij gh cy nsrs gq, fu/kkZj.k visf{kr gksrk gSA foi{kh }kjk LVsV vkWaQ xqtjkr cuke izre

flag ujflag ijekj ds fu.kZ; esa eku- lokZsPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vf/ker dk voyac ysrs gq, ;g dgk gS fd Hkkjr

ljdkj ds ijek.kq mtkZ foHkkx ds v/khu lapkfyr vUos"k.k laLFkku dks m|ksx dh ifjHkk"kk esa ugh j[kk tk ldrk gS

D;ksafd ;g laizHkqrk iw.kZ d`R; dk ,d Hkkx gSA izkFkhZ us ,sls dksbZ rF; izLrqr ugha fd;s gS ftlls vizkFkhZ ds m|ksx

gksus dk rF; fu"dkf"kZr fd;k tk ldsA eSaus bl rdZ o izfrikfnr fof/k ij euu fd;k gSA

16-

izkFkhZ us ;g rF; HkyhHkkWfr izekf.kr fd;k gS fd foi{kh @vizkFkhZ ;|fi ijek.kq mtkZ foHkkx ds v/khu

ijek.kq [kfut vUos"k.k o vuqla/kku dk dk;Z djrk gS& fdarq vizkFkhZ }kjk laikfnr dk;Zdyki tSlk fd foi{kh ds

lk{kh fouksn dqekj lh- ds- }kjk of.kZr gSa& foi{kh dks Þm|ksxß dh ifjHkk"kk ds varxZr ykus dk vk/kkj izdV gksrs gSaSA

uewuksa gsrq fy;s x;s [kfut inkFkksZ dk ijh{k.k o rnqijkar mudk fo|qr ds O;olkf;d mRiknu esa iz;ksx] fuf'pr :Ik

ls Þm|ksxßesa lapkfyr izfØ;k ekuh tk ldrh gS foi{kh laLFkku ijek.kq mtkZ foHkkx dk vax gS tks ijek.kq fo|qr dk

mRiknu Hkh djrk gSA

17-

vf/kfu;e esa micaf/kr ifjHkk"kk o loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vf/kerksa ds izdk'k esa foi{kh }kjk lk{; esa

iznf'kZr i= iznZ'k vkj&1 esa of.kZr fofu'p; ftlesa Je o fof/k ea=ky; }kjk foi{kh laLFkku dks vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk

2 ¼j½ ds vUrZxr ßm|ksxÞ ugha ekuk x;k gS& fdlh izdkj Lohdk;Z ,oa xzkà; ugha gSA foi{kh laLFkku esa ,sls [kfut

dk ijh{k.k o vuqla/kku fd;k tkrk gS& tks ;wjsfu;e izekf.kr gksus ij fo|qr ds O;olkf;d mRiknu esa iz;qDr gksrk

gS& ;g fookfnr ugha gS fd bl izdkj mRikfnr fo|qr ds fodz; ls foi{kh dks O;olkf;d /kuktZu gksrk gSA blfy,

foi{kh laLFkku fuf'pr :Ik ls ßm|ksxÞ gksuk izekf.kr gksrk gSA vr% ;g fcanq izkFkhZx.k ds i{k esa fu.kZr fd;k tkrk

gSaA

18-

1- bl lanHkZ esa izkFkhZ Jhjke 'kekZ us viuh eq[; ijh{kk fnukad 30-01-2020 esa dgk gS fd mldh fu;qfDr

vizkFkhZ fu;kstd ds ;gkWa 06-07-2006 dks prqFkZ Js.kh ¼rduhdh lgk;d½ ds in ij gqbZ FkhA izkFkhZ us

vius iwoZ 'kiFk i= fnukad 06-07-2014 esa fu;qfDr frfFk 06-07-2005 of.kZr dh gS] fdarq vfHkHkk'kd izkFkhZ

us bls Vad.k dh =qfV dgrs gq, 06-07-2006 gh ekuus dk fuosnu fd;k & bl fuosnu ij foi{kh us

vkifRr ugha dh gS& vr% fu;qfDr frfFk 06-07-2006 gh lk{; esa xzg.k dh tk jgh gSaA

19-

izkFkhZ us vkxkeh dFku esa 29-04-2008 rd yxkrkj dk;Z djuk o 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z djuk Hkh dgk

gSA izkFkhZ us Lo;a dh mifLFkfr foi{kh }kjk la/kkfjr xsV&jftLVj esa djuk dgk gSA izkFkhZx.k dk ;g vk{ksi gS fd

foi{kh us eku- mPp U;k;ky; }kjk fn;s x;s funsZ'k ds mijkar Hkh ,usDlj&1 ¼izkFkZuki= fnukad 27-11-2012½ esa of.kZr

vfHkys[k izLrqr ugha fd;k gS&;fn og okafNr vfHkys[k izLrqr fd;k tkrk rks izkFkhZx.k dh mifLFkfr rFkk 240 fnu

ls vf/kd foi{kh ds v/khu yxkrkj dk;Z fd;k tkuk izekf.kr gks tkrkA vr% foi{kh ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk dh

tkosaA foi{kh dk ;g rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k dks oLrqr% va'kdkyhu lafonk ds vk/kkj ij dke ij fy;k x;k FkkA foHkkx

}kjk eLVj jksy j[kk tkrk Fkk ftlesa mifLFkr gkus ij izkFkhZ dh mifLFkfr vafdr dh tkrh FkhA izR;sd ekg esa

Jfed }kjk fd;s x;s dk;Z fnolksa ds vuqlkj mldk Hkqxrku fd;k x;k gSA ftl vof/k esa izkFkhZx.k }kjk dk;Z ugh

fd;k x;k& ml le; ds eLVj jksy gksuk laHko ugha gSA izkFkhZx.k pawfd fu;fer deZpkjh ds :i esa fu;qDr ugha Fks&

blfy, is&fcy jftLVj esa mudk uke vafdr ugha gSA xsV&jftLVj fu;ekuqlkj ,d o"kZ ds fy, j[kk tkrk gS

mlds Ik'pkr u"V dj fn;k tkrk gS&ftldk i`Fkd ls vfHkys[k j[kk tkuk fu;e ds vuqlkj visf{kr ugha gSA

blfy, izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk ds dksbZ vk/kkj fo|eku ugha gSA

20-

foi{kh us l'kiFk dFku djrs gq, okafNr izys[kksa ds laca/k esa ;g dgk gS%

1- xsV&jftLVj 11 ls 14 o"kZ iqjkus gSa& tks ek= 1 o"kZ rd gh lqjf{kr j[ks tkrs gS blfy, izLrqr

ugha fd;s x;sA

2- osru okmplZ izkFkhZx.k ds laca/k esa la/kkfjr gh ugha fd;s x;s D;ksafd os fu;fer vk/kkj ij fu;qDr

ugha FksA Hkqxrku laca/kh izfof"V eLVj jksy ij dh xbZ gS& tks izLrqr fd;s x;s gaSA

3- cSad LVSVesaV izLrqr dj fn;s gSA

4- dk;Z vkoaVu jftLVj& izkFkhZx.k ds fu;fer vk/kkj ij fu;qDr u gksus rFkk izkFkhZx.k dks dksbZ

fof'k"V dk;Z u fn;s tkus ds dkj.k ;g jftLVj la/kkfjr ugha fd;s x;s& izkFkhZx.k dh lsok]

fufonk izLrqr djus ds vk/kkj ij yh xbZ& blfy, izLrqr ugha gq, gSA

5- deZpkfj;ks dh lwph dsoy fu;fer deZpkfj;kas dh j[kh tkrh gS& izkFkhZx.k ds fu;fer deZpkjh u

gksus ls& la/kkfjr ugha dh xbZ o izLrqr ugha gqbZA

416 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

6- dz; iaftdk dh] mifLFkfr@Hkqxrku ls lqlaxrrk u gksus ls izLrqr ugha fd;k x;k Fkk fdarq

izfrijh{kk esa izkFkhZ ds vkxzg ij izn'kZ MCY;w&17 ds :Ik esa iznf'kZr gqvk gSA foi{kh }kjk izn'kZ

vkj&7 ls vkj&11 rd eLVj jksy izLrqr fd;s x;s gS tks & izkFkhZ dh mifLFkfr ls lacaf/kr gSaA

bu eLVj jksy ds vfrfjDr foi{kh us izn'kZ vkj&5 o vkj&6 mifLFkfr i=d Hkh lk{; esa izLrqr

fd;s gS&ftuesa of.kZr mifLFkfr fooj.k izn'kZ W- 7] W- 10] W- 11] W- 12] W- 15] W- 16] ls

lekurk n'kkZrk gSA ;gh ugha izkFkhZ us vius izfrijh{kk esa izn'kZ vkj&5@3@ vuqyXud&3 esa

of.kZr fooj.k dks Lo;a ls lacaf/kr fooj.k gksuk] o lgh gksuk Lohdkj fd;k gSA

21-

izkFkhZ us vius lk{; esa ;g dgk gS fd mls dke djus dk iSlk pSd ls feyrk FkkA 06-02-2020 dks iqu%

fd;s x;s izfrijh{k.k esa mlus dgk gS fd izn'kZ vkj&7 ls vkj&11 rd eLVj jksy ds vk/kkj ij mls uxn Hkqxrku

gqvk gSA var esa ;g Hkh Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mlls ftrus fnu dke fy;k x;k& mldk Hkqxrku foi{kh us dj fn;k

gSA

22-

foi{kh lk{kh lfPpnkuaUn uk;d us ;|fi viuh izfrijh{kk esa dgk gS fd 2006 ds dksbZ eLVj jksy is'k ugha

fd;s gSaSA pSd ls Hkqxrku ds cSad LVsVesaV is'k fd;s gS tks izn'kZ vkj&13 gS fdarq izkFkhZ dks fd;s Hkqxrku dk mYys[k

blesa ugh gS D;ksafd 17-12-2006 ls cSad LVsVesaV is'k fd;k gSA fdarq cSad LVsVesaV o eLVj jksy iwjs izLrqr u gksus ij

Hkh izn'kZ vkj&5 o vkj&6 esa of.kZr mifLFkfr fooj.k dks izkFkhZx.k }kjk lgh gksuk Lohdkj dj ysus ds dkj.k foi{kh

dh ln~HkkfoDrk ij izfrdwy izHkko ugha iM+rk gSaA ;g mi/kkfjr djuk mfpr ugha gS fd foi{kh us izkFkhZx.k dh

okLrfod mifLFkfr dks Nqikus ds mn~s'; ls dksbZ izys[k izLrqr ugha fd;s gksaA D;ksafd izkFkhZx.k dh mifLFkfr laca/kh

fooj.k ftls izkFkhZ us lgh ekuk gS& vfHkys[k ij miyC/k gSaA

23-

vc izkFkhZ }kjk vius izfrijh{kk esa fd;s x;s dqN egRoiw.kZ dFkuksa ij Hkh blh lanHkZ esa fopkj djuk lqlaxr

gSA

izkFkhZ dgrk gS fd mls dksbZ fu;qfDr i= ugha feykA og Bsds dk vFkZ le>rk gSaSA ch- ,- ikl gSA izn'kZ

MCY;w& 3 dks izkFkhZ us Lo;a ds QksVks o gLrk{kj ;qDr gksuk Lohdkj fd;k gSA og ;g Hkh Lohdkj djrk gS fd mlus

izn'kZ MCY;w& 3 ds ek/;e ls Bsds ij dk;Z djus ds fy, vkosnu izLrqr fd;k gS& mlus o"kZ 2007 esa Hkh Bsds ij

dk;Z djus ds fy, vkosnu fd;k FkkA Bsds ij dk;Z djus ds fy, lHkh ls ¼izkFkhZx.k ls½ vyx& vyx gLrk{kj

djok;s tkrs Fks& tks dke djrs Fks& mldk iSlk fey tkrk FkkA izkFkhZ ds bu dFkuks dks izn'kZ vkj&4 o vkj&5

vkns'k ls iqf"V feyrh gS ftlesa izkFkhZ dks DoksVs'kuksa ds vk/kkj ij nks ekg dh vof/k gsrq 6000@& #- esa dk;Z

djokus dh Lohd`fr tkjh dh xbZ gSA ;g Lohd`fr izkFkhZ ds izkFkZuki= izn'kZ vkj&3 ds vk/kkj ij gS ftlesa izkFkhZ us

dke Bsds ij 6000@& #- esa djus dh lgefr nh o ifjopu fd;k gSA

24-

izkFkhZ ds i{k esa izn'kZ W- 5 }kjk vDrwoj 2006 esa fd;s x;s Bsds ds dk;Z gsrq 1550@& #- Lohd`r fd;s

tkus dk mYys[k gSA blls ;g vkHkkl feyrk gS fd izn'kZ R- 5@1 ls izn'kZ R- 6@5 rd Lohd`r mifLFkfr fooj.k

esa ftl vof/k esa izkFkhZx.k dks dk;Zjr ugha gksuk n'kkZ;k x;k gS& ml vof/k esas izkFkhZx.k us Bsds ij O;fDrxr :Ik ls

le;c} o mn~s'; iwfrZ rd fuf'pr /kujkf'k ij dk;Z fd;k gSA

25-

lk{; dh bl fLFkfr rFkk izkFkhZi{k dh LohdkjksfDr ds vfLrRo esa izkFkhZx.k dh foi{kh }kjk fdlh in ij

fu;qfDr fd;k tkuk izekf.kr ugha gksrk& oju ;g izekf.kr gksrk gS fd izkFkhZx.k us foi{kh ds fy, uewuksa ds inkFkZ dh

dVkbZ] filkbZ] lQkbZ] iSfdax] vkfn dk;Z dks Bsds ij djus ds fy, fuf'pr dk;Z laiknu] fuf'pr vof/k esa]& fu;r

/kujkf'k gsrq djus dh lgefr o Lohd`fr nh gSA Bsds ij dk;Z laiknu ds mijkar tuojh 2007 ls vizsy 2008 dh

vof/k esa izkFkhZx.k us fofHkUu efguksa esa izn'kZ R- 5 o R- 6 esa fn;s x;s fooj.k ds vuq:Ik mifLFkr jgdj dk;Z Hkh

fd;kA lk{; ds bl foospu ls vizkFkhZ o izkFkhZx.k ds e/; fu;kstd o deZdkj dk laca/k LFkkfir gksuk izekf.kr ugha

gksrk gSA

26-

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls fu.kZ; fd'ku flag cuke ,Dth- bathfu;j esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g vf/ker fn;k

gS fd tc nSfud osru Hkksxh dks fu;fer in ds fo:} fu;qDr fd;k gks& rks lsok lekfIr ds iwoZ vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk

25 ¼,Q½s ds izko/kkuksa dk vuqikyu vko';d gSa

27-

Mk;jsDVj fQ'kjht VfeZuy fMohtu cuke Hkhdw HkkbZ es?kkth HkkbZ pkoM+k ds fu.kZ; esa eku- mPpre

U;k;ky; us ;g ekxZn'kZu fn;k gS fd /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½s vf/kfu;e ds lanHkZ esa 240 fnu dh yxkrkj lsok izekf.kr djus

gsrq ,d nSfud osru Hkksxh ls leLr mifLFkfr vfHkys[k izLrqr djus dh vis{kk mfpr ugha gSA deZdkj us tc ;g

nkok fd;k gks fd mlus 240 fnu dk;Z fd;k gS rks& fu;kstd ij ;g flf}Hkkj varfjr gks tkrk gS fd og deZdkj

}kjk 240 fnu lsok iw.kZ u djuk izekf.kr djsA

28-

gLrxr izdj.kksa esa izkFkhZx.k }kjk Bsds ij dk;Z djuk o foi{kh }kjk izLrqr mifLFkfr fooj.k dks Lohdkj

dj ysus dh fLFkfr esa bu fu.kZ;ksa esa izfrikfnr fof/k rF;kRed fHkUurk ds dkj.k izkFkhZx.k ds izfr lgk;d ugha gSA

29-

vkj- ,e- ;sykrh cuke vfl- ,DthD;wfVo bathfu;j ds fu.kZ; esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g izfrikfnr

fd;k gS fd 240 fnu lrr lsok djus ds rF; dks izekf.kr djus dk izkFkfed flf}Hkkj oknh@ izkFkhZ ij gh gS& ;g

nkf;Ro oknh }kjk Lohdk;Z lk{; ¼ekSf[kd o izys[kh;½ izLrqr djds mUeksfpr fd;k tkrk gSA nSfud osru Hkksxh

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

417

Jfed ;fn fu;kstd ls mifLFkfr o osru Hkqxrku dk vfHkys[k izLrqr djokus dk fuosnu djsa& vkSj fu;kstd izLrqr

u djs& rks fu;kstd ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk djus dk fofu'p; izR;sd ekeys ds rF;ksa ij fuHkZj gksxkA gLrxr

izdj.kksa dh mi;qZDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds izdk'k esa foi{kh ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk fd;s tkus dk dksbZ vk/kkj fo|eku

ugha gSA rFkk ;g fu.kZ;t fof/k izkFkhZ ds i{k esa lgk;d ugha gSA

30-

fizalhiy Mwaxj dkWayst chdkusj cuke vkseizdk'k esa eku- jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us dgk gS fd deZdkj

tc 240 fnu dh yxkrkj lsok ,d dsys.Mj o"kZ esa iwoZ djus dk nkok djsa ,oa fu;kstd us bl rF; dk okXNy&

iw.kZ [kaMu fd;k gks& rks mls fu;kstd dh Lohd`fr le>k tkosaA

31-

ch- Mh- vks- izkxiqj cuke ;ksfxaUnj dqekj o vU; esa eku- fgekpy izns'k mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fof/k Hkh

rF;kRed fHkUurk ds dkj.k izkFkhZx.k ds izfr lgk;d ugha gSA

32-

blds foijhr foi{kh dh vksj ls ,e- ih- bysfDVªflVh cksMZ cuke gfjjke o lqjsUnz uxj fMfLVªDV iapk;r

cuke Mk;k HkkbZ vejflag ds ekeysa esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vf/ker dk voyEc fy;k x;k gSA bl

fu.kZ; esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd lsok lekfIr ds iwoZorhZ ,d dsys.Mj o"kZ esa 240 fnu

yxkrkj dk;Z djus ds rF; dk flf}Hkkj deZdkj ij gh gSA tc deZdkj bl rF; dks izekf.kr djus gsrq dksbZ lk{;

izLrqr u djs rFkk fu;kstd }kjk eLVj jksy izLrqr djus ij mudk [ka.Mu Hkh u djs& rks ;g dgk tkuk pkfg;s fd

deZdkj us flf}Hkkj dk mUekspu ugha fd;k gSA U;k;ky; dks fu;kstd ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk rc gh djuk

pkfg;s tc okafNr lk{; dk vfLrRo esa gksuk deZdkj izekf.kr djs] ftls izLrqr fd;k tk ldrk gksA Je U;k;ky;

ds le{k tkWp dk ifj{ks= lsok lekfIr ds iwoZorhZ 12 eghuksa rd gh lhfer gS& blh vof/k dks ijhf{kr dj og

fu/kkZfjr djsxk fd deZdkj dks vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ dk laj{k.k ns; gS vFkok ughaA bu fu.kZ;ksa esa ikfjr fof/k

ls ;g Li"V ekxZn'kZu izkIr gksrk gS fd izkFkhZx.k }kjk xsV jftLVj ds izLrqrhdj.k dh ekWx djus ij mlds u"V gks

tkus dk l'kiFk dFku vizkFkhZ }kjk fd;k x;k gS] blfy, ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk gS fd vizkFkhZ us fdlh izys[k ds

vfLrRo esa gksrs gq, Hkh tkuow> dj] izyf{kr mn~s'; ls mls izLrqr ugha fd;k gksA blds vfrfjDr ;g Hkh egRoiw.kZ gS

fd vizkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr mifLFkfr& fooj.k izn'kZ vkj& 5@1 ls vkj& 6@5 o eLVj jksy izn'kZ vkj& 7 ls vkj&

11 rd dks izkFkhZx.k us Lohdkj djrs gq, fo[kafMr ugha fd;k gSA blfy, vizkFkhZ ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk fd;k

tkuk U;k;ksfpr o fof/klEer ugha gSA

33-

foi{kh us ,e- ih- bysfDVªflVh cksMZ cuke gfjjke ds fu.kZ; esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fof/k dk

voyac ysdj ;g Hkh dgk gS fd izkFkhZx.k dk dk;Z vLFkkbZ o vko';drk tfur Fkk& ftls vko';drk u gksus ij

can Hkh fd;k x;k FkkA bl rF; dh iqf"V lk{kh fouksn dqekj lh- ds- ds dFkuksa ls gqbZ gSaA bl fu.kZ; esa eku-

mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g ekxZn'kZu fn;k gS fd lhfer dk;Z ds fy, LFkkuh; O;fDr;ksa dks fn;k x;k fu;kstu& lrr

o fu;fer dk;Z gsrq ugha le>k tk ldrk gSA tc eLVj jksy ls Hkh ;g izdV gks fd fu;fer varjky ij Jfed ls

dk;Z fy;k x;k gS] ;g izekf.kr ugha gksrk gS fd fu;kstd dks ml dk;Z dh lrr vko';drk jgh gksA vizkFkhZ }kjk

izLrqr mifLFkfr fooj.k o eLVj jksy ds voyksdu ls Hkh izkFkhZx.k ls djok;k x;k dk;Z lrr izd`fr dk izekf.kr

ugha gqvk gS& D;ksafd mifLFkfr fooj.k esa izR;sd ekg esa fy;k x;k dk;Z] varjky lfgr gSA

34-

izkFkhZx.k dk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k ls Bsdk& Jfed ds :Ik esa dk;Z ;fn fy;k x;k gS rks vizkFkhZ ds

ikl mDr mn~s'; gsrq vuqKki= gksuk vko';d Fkk& ftldk u gksuk vizkFkhZ us Lohdkj fd;k gS& blfy, izkFkhZx.k

dks vizkFkhZ }kjk fu;qDr gh ekuk tkosaA foi{kh us bl laca/k esa fdlh vuqKki= dh vko';drk u gksuk dg dj rdZ

dk fojks/k fd;k gSA rdZ ij fopkj fd;k x;kA

35-

Bsdk Jfed ¼fofu;eu ,oa mUewyu½ vf/kfu;e 1970 dh /kkjk 1 ds vUrZxr vf/kfu;e ds izko/kkuksa ds

foLrkj dk mica/k fd;k x;k gSA bl vf/kfu;e dh mi/kkjk 1 ¼4½ (a) ds vuqlkj izR;sd ,slk LFkkiu@laLFkku tgkW

chl ;k mlls vf/kd deZdkj fu;ksftr gksa ;k foxr ckjg eghuksa ds nkSjku fdlh fnu fu;ksftr jgs gks& ij gh

vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku iz;ksT; gksxsaA bu izdj.kksa esa izkFkhZx.k us ,slh dksbZ lk{; izLrqr ugha dh gS ftlls vizkFkhZ ds

v/khu chl ;k mlls vf/kd deZdkjksa dk fu;ksftr gksuk izekf.kr gksrk gksA blfy, izkFkhZx.k dk ;g rdZ lkjoku

ugha gSA

36-

mi;ZqDr foospu ls ;g Li"V :Ik ls izekf.kr gS fd izkFkhZx.k lsok lekfIr dh frfFk 29-04-2008 ls iwoZorhZ

,d dsys.Mj o"kZ dh vof/k esa vizkFkhZ ds fu;kstu esa 240 fnu yxkrkj dk;Z djus dk rF; izekf.kr djus esa foQy

jgs gSa& blfy, vizkFkhZ }kjk izkFkhZx.k dh NVuh 30-04-2008 ls fd;k tkuk Hkh Lo;a gh izekf.kr ugha gksrk gSA

ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa ds varxZr fdlh izdkj dk laj{k.k izkIr djus ds

vf/kdkjh izekf.kr ugha gq, gSA vr% ;g fopkj.kh; fcanq izkFkhZx.k ds fo:} fu.khZr fd;k tkrk gSA

37-

foi{kh us ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mUgksaus izkFkhZx.k dks vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa ds varxZr

dksbZ uksfVl ugha fn;k u gh uksfVl osru o {kfriwfrZ dk Hkqxrku fd;k& D;ksafd uksfVl LFkkbZ deZpkfj;ksa dks fn;k

tkrk gS rFkk izkFkhZx.k Lo;a gh dke NksM+ dj pys tkrs FksA fcanq la- 2 ds fofu'p; ds izdk'k esa izkFkhZx.k dks pawfd

418 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa dk laj{k.k izkIr ugha gqvk gS] blfy, bu izko/kkuks dh ikyuk fd;s tkus

dh ck/;rk vizkFkhZ dks ugha Fkh& vr% ;g fcanq izkFkhZx.k ds fo:} fu.khZr fd;k tkrk gSA

38-

bl fcanq ds laca/k esa izkFkhZ us vius dFku esa dgk gS fd vizkFkhZ }kjk dksbZ ofj"Brk lwph ugh cukbZ og tks

dk;Z djrk Fkk& mls vU; Jfeadks ls djok;k tk jgk gSA ;g mYys[kuh; gS fd izkFkhZ us vius vfHkopukas ;k lk{;

esa mu O;fDr;ksa dk uke Hkh of.kZr ugha fd;k gS ftUgsa izkFkhZ dks lsokeqDr djus ds mijkar dfu"B gksus ij Hkh lsok esa

j[kk x;k gksA

39-

foi{kh us vius lk{; esa dgk gS fd izkFkhZ ds dk;Z NksM+dj pys tkus ds okn mDr dk;Z dh lekfIr ij

fdlh vU; Jfed dks dk;Z ij ugha yxk;k x;k gS rFkk fdlh dfu"B Jfed dks fu;qfDr ugha nh xbZ gSA izfrijh{kk

esa ;g Hkh dgk gS fd orZeku esa Bsds ij tks Jfed dk;Zjr gS os ml dk;Z ls layXu ugha gS ftl ij izkFkhZ dk;Zjr

jgk gSA orZeku Jfedksa dh dk;Z dh izd`fr orZeku deZpkjh ls fHkUu gSaA

40-

izkFkhZ dh izfr ijh{kk esa mlus Lohdkj fd;k gS fd izn'kZ vkj& 12 lwph esa mldk uke ugha gS D;ksafd og

LFkkbZ deZpkfj;ksa dh lwph gSA foi{kh dk ;g Hkh lk{; gS fd pWwfd izkFkhZ fu;fer deZpkjh ugha Fkk blfy, is fcy

jftLVj esa mldk uke ugha gSA izkFkhZ dk uke rks eLVj jksy esa gh vafdr gksrk FkkA

41-

fcanq la- 2 ds fofu'p; ls ;g LFkkfir gks pqdk gS fd vizkFkhZ }kjk izkFkhZx.k dks fdlh LFkkbZ ;k fu;fer

in ij fu;qfDr ugha nh xbZ Fkh& oju izkFkhZx.k dks dk;Z dh vko';drk gsrq vLFkkbZ :Ik ls lafonk ds vk/kkj ij

fuf'pr jkf'k ds Hkqxrku ij j[kk FkkA ,sls Jfedksa dh dksbZ ofj"Brk lwph dk la/kkj.k fd;k tkuk foi{kh ds fy,

ck/;dkjh ugha gSA

42-

eku- mPpre U;k;ky; us lqjsUnz uxj fMfLVªDV iapk;r cuke Mk;k HkkbZ vejflag ds fu.kZ; esa leku rF;ksa

ij fopkj djrs gq, ;g dgk gS fd fu;fer fu;kstu ds vHkko esa ofj"Brk lwph dk la/kkj.k fu;kstd ls visf{kr ugha

Fkk& nSfud osru Hkksxh Jfedksa dh ofj"Brk lwph dk la/kkj.k fof/kd vis{kk ugha gSA bl foospu ds mijkar ;g fcanq

izkFkhZ ds fo:} fu.khZr fd;k tkrk gSA

fopkj.kh; fcanqvksa ij izkIr foosfpr fu"d"kZ ds vk/kkj ij vizkFkhZ laLFkku ;|fi m|ksx dh ifjHkk"kk ds

vUrxZr vkuk izekf.kr gqvk gS fdarq lk{; ds v/kkj ij vizkFkhZ }kjk izkFkhZx.k dh NVuh fd;k tkuk izekf.kr ugh

gqvk gS& blfy, vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa dk laj{k.k izkFkhZx.k dks miyC/k ugha gSA vizkFkhZ }kjk

izkFkhZ ls fdlh dfu"Brj O;fDr dks lsok esa j[kk tkuk fl) ugha gqvk gS&bl izdkj izkFkhZx.k vf/kfu;e ds varxZr

fdlh Hkh izko/kku dk laj{k.k ikus dks vf/kdkjoku izekf.kr ugha gq, gSA blfy, izkFkhZx.k vizkFkhZ ds fo:} dksbZ

vuqrks"k ikus ds vf/kdkjh ugha gSA

vr% izkFkhZx.k& vizkFkhZ laLFkku ds fo:} dksbZ vuqrks"k izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh ugha gSa& vf/kfu.kZ; blh

izdkj ikfjr fd;k tkrk gSA vf/kfu.kZ; dh izfr izR;sd vkS|ksfxd fookn i=koyh esa layXu dh tkos rFkk iapkV dh

izfrfyfi vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 dh /kkjk 17 ¼1½ ds vuqlj.k esa izdk'kukFkZ izsf"kr dh tkosaA

iapkV vkt fnukad 29 fnlEcj 2020 dks fy[kk o gLrk{kfjr fd;k x;kA

jk/kk eksgu prqosZnh] ihBklhu vf/kdkjh

ubZ fnYyh] 18 Qjojh] 2021

—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

LVkj ;wfu;u nSbph ykbQ ba”kksjsal dEiuh fyfeVsM] uoh eqEcbZ ,oa y[kuÅ ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds

deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] y[kuÅ

ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 30@2014½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18-02-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-17011@01@2014-vkbZvkj ¼,e)]

uohu oS|] mi funs'kd

New Delhi, the 18th February, 2021

S.O. 155.—In In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 30/2014) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Star Union

Daiichi Life Insurance Company Limited, Navi Mumbai & Lucknow and their workmen, received by the

Central Government on 18.02.2021.

[No. L-17011/01/2014-IR(M)]

NAVIN VAIDYA, Dy. Director

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

419

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL–CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

PRESENT: P. K. SRIVASTAVA HJS (Retd.)

I.D. No. 30/2014

Ref. No. L-17011/01/2014-IR(M) dated 17.04.2014

BETWEEN :

Shri Durgesh Kumar Choudhary

Asstt. Manager

Star Union Daiichi Life Insurance Co. Ltd.

R/o 496/102, Chota Chandganj, Nirala Nagar

Lucknow-226020.

Vs

1. The CEO

Star Union Daiichi Life Insurance Co. Ltd.

11th Floor, Raghuleela Arcade, I.T. Park

Sector 30A, Opp. Vashi Railway Station Vashi

Navi Mumbai-400703

2. The Manager

Star Union Daiichi Life Insurance Co. Ltd.

401-402 Ratan Square Building

Hazratganj, Lucknow.

AWARD

1.

By order No. L-17011/01/2014-IR(M) dated 17.04.2014, the Central Government in the Ministry of

Labour, New Delhi in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub section (1) and sub section (2A) of

Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) referred this industrial dispute between

Shri Durgesh Kumar Choudhary, Asstt. Manager, Star Union Daiichi Life Insurance Co. Ltd., R/o 496/102,

Chota Chandganj, Nirala Nagar, Lucknow and the CEO, Star Union Daiichi Life Insurance Co. Ltd., 11th Floor,

Raghuleela Arcade, I.T. Park, Sector 30A, Opp. Vashi Railway Station Vashi, Navi Mumbai & the Manager,

Star Union Daiichi Life Insurance Co. Ltd., 401-402 Ratan Square Building, Hazratganj, Lucknow for

adjudication.

2.

The reference under adjudication is:

“WHETHER THE ACTION OF THE MANAGEMENT OF STAR UNION DAIICHI LIFE

INSURANCE CO. LTD., NAVI MUMBAI & LUCKNOW IN TERMINATING THE SERVICES

OF SHRI DURGESH KUMAR CHOUDHARY W.E.F. 28.10.2013 IS LEGAL AND JUSTIFIED?

IF NOT, WHAT OTHER RELIEF THE WORKMAN IS ENTITLED TO?”

3.

The order of reference was endorsed to Shri Durgesh Kumar Choudhary, Asstt. Manager, Star Union

Daiichi Life Insurance Co. Ltd., R/o 496/102, Chota Chandganj, Nirala Nagar, Lucknow with direction to the

party raising the dispute to filed the statement of claim along with relevant documents, list of reliance and

witnesses with the Tribunal within fifteen days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy

of such a statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in this dispute under rule 10 (B) of the Industrial

Disputes (Central), Rules, 1957.

4.

The industrial dispute was registered in the Tribunal on 23.05.2014 and the office was directed to issue

registered notice to the workman for filing the statement of claim with list of reliance & list of witnesses on

25.06.2014; but no statement of claim together with documents etc. was filed; however, the workman sought

adjournment by filing an application D-3. Since then the workman appeared on next date and thereafter, did not

turn up at all nor filed any statement of claim till date.

5.

It is well settled that if a party challenges the legality of an action, the burden lies upon it to prove

illegality of the action and if no evidence is produced by the party, invoking jurisdiction of the court, must fail.

In the present case burden was on the workman to set out the grounds to challenge the validity of the action of

the management in terminating his services; but no statement of claim had been filed even after lapse of more

than six years’ time.

420 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

6.

In the above circumstances, it appears that the workman does not want to pursue its claim on the basis

of which it has raised the present industrial dispute; therefore, the present reference is decided against workman.

Resultantly the workman is held entitled to any relief.

7.

The reference under adjudication is answered accordingly.

8.

Award as above.

Let two copies of this award be sent to the Ministry for publication.

LUCKNOW

25th January, 2021

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 18 Qjojh] 2021

—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

cSad vkQ bafM;k ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] y[kuÅ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 95@2004½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18-02-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-12012@145@2004-vkbZvkj ¼ch-II)]

lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 18th February, 2021

S.O. 156.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 95/2004) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Bank of India,

and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18.02.2021.

[No. L-12012/145/2004-IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL–CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

PRESENT : P. K. SRIVASTAVA , HJS (Retd.)

I.D. No. 95/2004

Ref. No. L-12012/145/2004-IR(B-II) dated 29.09.2004

BETWEEN :

Sh. Budhiram Prasad S/o Late Sh. Lolark Nath

Mo. Rajapura, Aurai Road, Bhadohi

Sant Ravidas Nagar, Bhadohi.

Vs.

The Zonal Manager

Bank of India

B-20/44A-7, Varanasi Zone, Plaza Complex,

Bhelupura, Varanasi (UP) – 221010.

AWARD

1.

By order No. L-12012/145/2004-IR(B-II) dated 29.09.2004 the Central Government in the Ministry of

Labour, New Delhi in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub section (1) and sub section (2A) of

Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) referred this industrial dispute between

Sh. Budhiram Prasad S/o Late Sh. Lolark Nath, Mo. Rajapura, Aurai Road, Bhadohi, Sant Ravidas Nagar,

Bhadohi and the Zonal Manager, Bank of India, B-20/44A-7, Varanasi Zone, Plaza Complex, Bhelupura,

Varanasi (UP)for adjudication.

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

421

3.

The reference under adjudication is:

“WHETHER THE ACTION OF THE MANAGEMENT OF BANK OF INDIA, VARANASI,

ZONE, IN IMPOSING A PUNISHMENT OF COMPULSORY RETIREMENT W.E.F. 20.11.2003

ON SHRI BUDHIRAM PRASAD, AGRICULTURE ASSISTANT, IS JUSTIFIED AND LEGAL?

IF NOT WHAT RELIEF THE WORKMAN IS ENTITLED FOR?”

3.

It is the admitted case of the parties that the workman, Budhiram Prasad was working as Agriculture

Assistant in Naya Bazar branch of the Bank when he was had been issued a charge sheet dated 28.04.2003. The

management of the Bank appointed Sri D.R. Ram, Manager as Inquiry Officer, who submitted his enquiry

report dated 24.07.2003 before the disciplinary authority. A copy of the findings of the Inquiry Officer was

provided to the workman vide show cause later dated 06.09.2003. The Disciplinary Authority issued

punishment order dated 20.11.2003, which was confirmed by the Appellate Authority, after considering his

appeal dated 01.01.2004, vide appellate order dated 05.04.2004.

4.

The workman has submitted that he was not feeling well, therefore, he applied for medical leave w.e.f.

03.10.2002; along with medical certificate, issued by Medical Officer, Primary Health Center, Jairampur

Bhadohi; wherein he was advised for bed rest for 15 days, which was further extended for 15 days vide medical

certificate dated 18.10.2002. The workman has submitted that further vide medical certificate dated 02.11.2002

he was advised for 30 days’ bed rest being suffering from jaundice. The workman has alleged that the

management did not pay salary for the month of November, 2002. It has been stated that the workman met with

an accident and got his hand fractured, about which he informed the management with relevant certificates;

however, the bank vide its letter dated 24.01.2003, directing him to get medically examined by panel doctor of

the bank at Mugalsarai; but could not visit Mugalsarai due to financial constraints. Further, the workman has

alleged that the management vide letter dated 20.03.2003 directed to be present at his residence for medical

checkup; but none turned form the Bank for medical checkup and the bank vide letter dated 25.03.2003

mentioned that absence of workman from medical checkup shall be considered unauthorized absence and bank

is free for taking disciplinary action. The workman has alleged that the management arbitrarily issued charge

sheet dated 28.04.2003 and concluded ex-parte inquiry in absence of workman, denying his request regarding

his inability in presence due to illness. The workman has alleged that Disciplinary Authority relying on ex-parte

inquiry report imposed punishment of compulsory retirement with retiral benefits without disqualification for

future employment vide order dated 20.11.2003; and the Appellate Authority confirmed the same vide order

dated 05.04.2004, rejecting his appeal. The workman has also alleged that the inquiry officer conducted the ex-

parte departmental inquiry without observing the due procedure of domestic inquiry, in violation of the

principles of natural justice, inasmuch as the Inquiry Officer during the inquiry did not afford proper opportunity

to the workman for his defence; and the punishment ordered as well as appellate order is illegal. Accordingly,

the workman has prayed that the Departmental proceedings which were conducted in violation to the principles

of natural justice is liable to be set aside and he be reinstated with consequential benefits.

5.

The management of the Bank in its written statement has denied the allegations of the workman and

has submitted that the workman remained unauthorizedly absent from his duties w.e.f. 03.10.2002 on the plea of

sickness and kept on submitting various medical certificates, issued by various doctors; and when the Bank

asked him to present himself before Dr. Rajeev at Mughalsarai on 30.01.2003 for medical examination; the

workman declined the same, thereafter, he was directed to contact CMO with details of disease and get his

medical prescription/certificates counter signed by the CMO; but the workman again did not appear before

CMO. The management has submitted that when the workman did not appear before CMO, the management

deputed one doctor along with bank’s officer to visit the workman’s residence for his medical examination; but

the workman was not available at his residence for medical examination on 13.03.2003 and 19.03.2003. The

management has stated that when workman failed to comply with the directions of the Bank for getting himself

medically examined on various occasions, he was issued a charge sheet dated 28.04.2003 and a departmental

inquiry was initiated. The workman did not present himself before inquiry officer also, which led to proceed

inquiry in his absence and the inquiry was concluded on the basis of material available before the inquiry

officer. The management has stated that on submission of the inquiry report on 24.072003, the workman was

issued a show cause notice dated 06.09.2003 and was given chance for personal hearing on 20.09.2003 &

06.10.2003; but when the workman did not submit any reply to the show cause or turn up for personal hearing

on two successive dates, the order of punishment dated 20.11.2003 was issued, which was confirmed, after

considering appeal of the workman, by the Appellant Authority vide order dated 05.04.2004. The management

of the Bank has defended its domestic proceedings with submission that the workman had been afforded all

reasonable opportunity given under rules the principles of natural justice were fully complied with; and when

the workman did not turn up before the Inquiry Officer, in spite of serval communications, the Inquiry Officer

had left with no alternate than to proceed ex-parte against workman and conduct an ex-parte inquiry in absence

of the workman; hence, there is no anomaly with it; and accordingly, has prayed that domestic enquiry

422 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

proceedings conducted by it may be upheld and the action of the Bank vide order dated20.11.2003 be declared

just, fair and legal without any benefit to the workman concerned.

6.

The workman has filed rejoinder reiterating the averments already made in the statement of claim.

7.

The parties filed documentary evidence in support of their respective case. The workman examined

himself; whereas the management examined Shri Dudh Lal Ram Dev Ram in support of their respective

pleadings. The parties availed opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses of each other. The workman

retrained form proceedings since 27.01.2016. Following preliminary issues were framed vide order dated

30.12.2020:

(i) Whether the domestic inquiry conducted by the management is fair and proper.

(ii) Whether the findings of inquiry officer are perverse?

(iii) Whether the punishment imposed is proportionate to the charges or not?

After framing the above preliminary issues, the submissions of the authorized representative of the

management has been heard; and date was fixed for award, keeping in view long pendency of the case, since

2004.

8.

Heard learned counsel of the management alone and perused entire material available on record.

Issue No: 01:

9.

The authorized representative of the management has submitted that the workman committed gross

misconduct of unauthorized absence from duties. It has been argued by the learned counsel that the workman

who absented himself unauthorizedly w.e.f. 03.10.2002, did not appear before panel doctor for medical

examination nor did he let the Bank’s doctor to examine himself at his residence, therefore, he was issued a

charge sheet for his alleged unauthorized absence. It has further been submitted by the learned counsel that the

workman did not appeared before the inquiry and the inquiry was conducted in his absence; however, all

reasonable opportunity was afforded to the workman during the entire course of inquiry, but the workman failed

to avail the same; and there is no infirmity with the procedure adopted by the inquiry officer.

In rebuttal, the workman did not submit any oral or written submission; however, he has pleaded that

the departmental inquiry had been conducted in utter violation of the principles of natural justice and he was not

afforded proper opportunity to defend himself.

10.

The workman has come forward with a case that he had been issued charge sheet for unauthorized

absence, in spite of the fact that he had been giving constant information of his illness with supportive

documents. It is also the case of the workman that he was denied proper defence, before the inquiry officer and

the inquiry had been conducted in violation to the principles of natural justice. The management has denied the

charges and in support of its pleadings has filed number of correspondences; wherein the workman had been

directed to get his medical examination done by the doctor, prescribed by the Bank. However, from perusal of

the documents relied upon by the parties it is evident that the management made all efforts to get the medical

examination of the workman by its doctor to check the claim of the workman about his prolonged illness; but

the workman failed to comply with the directions of the management, which led to issuance of charge sheet

dated 28.04.2003; however the workman did not present himself before the Inquiry Officer and resultantly the

inquiry was conducted ex-parte, in absence of the workman and report was drawn on the basis of the material

and statement of the witnesses before the inquiry officer. Moreover, the Disciplinary Authority, relying upon

the inquiry report, issued a show cause along with copy of inquiry report to the workman with opportunity for

personal hearing. The workman neither filed reply to show cause nor appeared for personal hearing; and

accordingly, the punishment order was issued. It is evident form the documents on record that the workman

preferred an appeal, which was properly disposed of by the Appellate Authority. Thus, there seems no anomaly

with the inquiry or denial of principles of natural justices to the workman by the Inquiry.

It is well settled that if a party challenges the legality of an action, the burden lies upon it to prove

illegality of the action, here in the instant case, it was burden upon the workman to prove bonafide of his

prolonged absence; but he did not turn up during entire inquiry process, unless the punishment order was passed

by the Disciplinary Authority. However, in the case in hand, there is no iota of evidence on record which goes

to suggest that the workman made any effort to participate in the departmental inquiry and principles of natural

justice were ever denied to him during the inquiry. Thus, the workman utterly failed to substantiate that the

Inquiry Officer did not conduct the inquiry in accordance with the principles of natural justice; and accordingly,

the issue No. 01 is decided in favour of the management.

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

423

Issue No. 02:

11.

The workman has pleaded that the inquiry report of the Inquiry officer is based on surmise and

conjuncture and are perverse as based on no material. However, the management has denied the allegation of

the workman and has submitted that the findings of the inquiry officer are based on the evidence, collected by

the Inquiry Officer during the inquiry and are detailed.

From perusal of the Inquiry Report, it is evident that the Inquiry Officer has based his findings on the

documents produced during the inquiry and statement of witnesses who appeared before the inquiry. The

version of the workman could not be taken into account as he did not turn before the Inquiry and the inquiry

proceeded in his absence. Thus, it could be well inferred that the findings of the Inquiry Officer do not suffer

with the vice of perversity; and accordingly, the issue No. 02 is decided in favour of the management.

Issue No. 03:

12.

Now, after decision of the preliminary issue no. 01 & 02, in the favour of the management, the

pleadings of the workman that the punishment imposed upon him is disproportionate and this Tribunal should

interfere into it within the provisions providing under Section 11 A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is taken

into account. In this regard, it is well settled that the Labour Court has ample power under section 11-A of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to substitute a lesser punishment, taking into consideration the facts and

circumstances of the case. Moreover, the principle of proportionality calls for interference of this Court into the

punishment imposed by the management i.e. of removal in view of law in Joseph Solomon vs. Presiding Officer,

Labour Court, U.P., Dehradun & another 2012 (134) FLR 424.

13.

It is admitted proposition of law that the Court cannot sit in appeal or it cannot re-appreciate the

evidence relied before Inquiry Officer; in as much as it cannot alter the order or punishment; however, the scope

of invoking the powers given under Section 11 A of the Act, by the Labour Court is confined to the condition

that the Court should interfere with the order of punishment when it is disproportionate with respect to the

misconduct committed or it is harsh. Admittedly, in the instant case the workman was given charge sheet for

committing misconduct of ‘unauthorized absence from duties’. Moreover, it has been held in preceding para

that the disciplinary enquiry was conducted in accordance with the principles of natural justice and the workman

was afforded all reasonable opportunity to defend himself; and also that the findings of the Enquiry Officer do

not suffer with the vice of perversity.

14.

In the instant case the workman was charge sheeted for misconduct of unauthorized absence; which has

been duly proved during departmental inquiry; and the workman had been punished with the punishment of

compulsory retirement from service without disqualification form future employment. Hon’ble Apex Court in

B.C. Chayurvedi v. Union of India, (1995) 6 SCC 749 while discussing about the scope of judicial review, in

disciplinary matters, has observed as under:

“The High Court/Tribunal, while exercising the power of judicial review, cannot normally substitute

its own conclusion on penalty and impose some other penalty. If the punishment imposed by the

disciplinary authority or the appellate authority shocks the conscience of the High Court/Tribunal,

it would appropriately mould the relief, either directing the disciplinary/appellate authority to

reconsider the penalty imposed, or to shorten the litigation, it may itself, in exceptional and rare

cases, imposed appropriate punishment with cogent reasons in support thereof.”

In DG, RPF vs. Sai Babu (2003) 4 SCC 331, Hon’ble Apex Court has observed that:

“6…………. Normally, the punishment imposed by a disciplinary authority should not be disturbed

by the High Court or a tribunal except in appropriate cases that too only after reaching a conclusion

that the punishment imposed is grossly or shockingly disproportionate, after examining all the

relevant factors including the nature of charges proved against, the past conduct, penalty imposed

earlier, the nature of duties assigned having due regard to their sensitiveness, exactness expected of

an discipline required to be maintained, and the department/establishment which the delinquent

person concerned works.”

In United Commercial Bank vs. P.C. Kakkar (2003) 4 SCC 364 Hon’ble Apex Court on review of a

long line of cases and the principles of judicial review of administrative action under English law summarized

the legal position in the following words:

“11. The common thread running through in all these decisions is that the court should not

interfere with the administrators’ decision unless it was illogical or suffers from procedural

imp0ropriety or was shocking to the conscience of the court, in the sense that it was in

defiance of logic or moral standards. In view of what has been stated in Wednesbury case the

424 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

court would not go into the correctness of the choice made by the administrator open to him

and the court should not substitute its decision to that of the administrator. The scope of

judicial review is judicial review is limited to the deficiency in decision-making process and

not the decision.

12.

To put it differently, unless the punishment imposed by the disciplinary authority or the

appellate authority shocks the conscience of the court/tribunal, there is no scope for

interference. Further, to shorten litigation it may, in exceptional and rare cases, impose

appropriate punishment by recording cogent reasons in support thereof.”

In Union of India vs. S.S. Ahluwalia (2007) 7 SCC 257 Hon’ble Supreme Court reiterated the legal

position as follows:

“8.

……… The scope of judicial review in the matter of imposition of penalty as a

result of disciplinary proceedings is very limited. The court can interfere with the

punishment only if it finds the same to be shockingly disproportionate to the charges found

to be proved.”

In State of Meghalaya v. Mecken Singh N. Marak (2008) 7 SCC 580 Hon’ble Supreme Court stated

that:

“The punishment imposed by the disciplinary authority or the appellate authority unless

shocking to the conscience of the court, cannot be subjected to judicial review.

15.

Hon’ble Apex Court in Administrator, Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli vs. Gulbhia M. Lad

(2010) 2 SCC (L&S) 101 has observed that

“The legal position is fairly well settled that while exercising the power of judicial review,

the High Court or a Tribunal cannot interfere with the discretion exercised by the

disciplinary authority, and/or on appeal the appellate authority with regard to the

imposition of punishment unless such discretion suffers from illegality or material

procedural irregularity or that would shock the conscience of the court/tribunal. The

exercise of discretion in imposition of punishment by the disciplinary authority or appellate

authority is dependent on host of factors such as gravity of misconduct, past conduct, the

nature of duties assigned to the delinquent, responsibility of the position that the delinquent

holds, previous penalty, if any, and the discipline required to be maintained in the

department or establishment he works. Ordinarily the court or the tribunal would not

substitute its opinion on reappraisal of facts.

16.

The workman was punished with the punishment of compulsory retirement from service, without

disqualification from future employment; However, Hon’ble Supreme Court in catena of cases has observed that

overstaying on leave or unauthorized absenteeism from the workplace enables the employer to dismiss an

employee as it amounts to serious misconduct.

17.

Moreover, the Bank being a financial institution, the employee has to work with utmost devotion to its

customers and the absence of the workman without any prior approval of the authorities might lead to lack in

service to the customers; which is not permissible at all. Hon’ble Apex Court in (2011) 1 Supreme Court Cases

(L&S) 721 has observed that:

“7.

It is now well settled that the courts will not act as an appellate court and reassess

the evidence led in the domestic enquiry, nor interfere on the ground that another view is

possible on the material on record. If the inquiry has been fairly and properly held and the

findings are based on evidence, the question of adequacy of the evidence or the reliable

nature of the evidence will not be grounds for interfering with the findings in departmental

enquiries. Therefore the courts will not interfere with findings of fact recorded in

departmental inquiries, except where such findings are based on no evidence or where they

are clearly perverse. The test to find out perversity is to see whether a tribunal acting

reasonably could have arrived at such conclusion or findings, on the material on record.

The courts will however interfere with the findings in disciplinary matters, if principles of

natural justice or statutory regulations have been violated or if the order is found to be

arbitrary, capricious, mala fide or based on extraneous considerations.”

18.

In the instant case the charge of unauthorized absence had been found to be proved. Therefore, under

the facts and the circumstances and considering the laws pronounced by Hon’ble Supreme Court and Hon’ble

High Courts, there is no justification in interfering with the punishment imposed upon the workman by the

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

425

Appellate Authority for proved gross misconduct of ‘unauthorized absence’. Accordingly, the workman is not

entitled for any relief.

19.

Award as above.

Let two copies of this award be sent to the Ministry for publication.

LUCKNOW

28th January, 2021

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 18 Qjojh] 2021

—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

lSUVªy cSad vkQ bafM;k ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] y[kuÅ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 18@2017½ dks izdkf'kr

djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18-02-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-12011@20@2017-vkbZvkj ¼ch-II)]

lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 18th February, 2021

S.O. 157.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 18/2017) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Central Bank

of India, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18.02.2021.

[No. L-12011/20/2017-IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL–CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

PRESENT : P. K. SRIVASTAVA HJS (Retd.)

I.D. No. 18/2017

Ref. No. L-12011/20/2017-IR(B-II) dated 09.05.2017

BETWEEN :

The General Secretary

Central Bank Employees Association

C.B.E.A., D-75, Sector-D, LDA Colony

Kanpur Road Scheme

Lucknow – 226012.

(Espousing matter of Shri Vihbakar Kushwaha)

Vs.

1. The General Manager (HRD)

Central Bank of India, Central Office

Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400021.

2. The Zonal Manager

Central Bank of India

23, Vidhan Sabha Marg,

Lucknow – 226001.

3. The Regional Manager

Central Bank of India, Regional Office

73, Hazratganj, Lucknow – 226001.

426 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AWARD

1.

By order No. L-12011/20/2017-IR(B-II) dated 09.05.2017, the Central Government in the Ministry of

Labour, New Delhi in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub section (1) and sub section (2A) of

Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) referred this industrial dispute for adjudication.

The reference under adjudication is:

“WHETHER THE ACTION OF THE MANAGEMENT OF CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA,

LUCKNOW DEPRIVING PROMOTION TO SHRI VIBHAKAR KUSHWAHA TO THE POST OF

STENO-OFFICER IS JUST, FAIR AND LEGAL? IF NOT, WHAT RELIEF THE WORKMAN

CONCERNED IS ENTITLED TO?”

3.

The case of the workman, Vibhakar Kushwaha, in brief is that he joined the services of the bank as

Stenographer on 08.04.1985 and was posted at Regional Office, Etawah; and subsequently, was transferred to

Lucknow in same capacity and emoluments, on his own request vide order dated 29.07.1988 and was paid

steno-allowance; but the said allowance was stopped vide order dated 19.05.1990 with immediate effect, in

violation to the clause 5.9 of Bi-partite Settlement. It has been alleged by the workman that he was transferred

back to Etawah on 22.08.1990 and on his joining at Etawah his steno-allowance was again resumed by the

management; but when again the workman requested for transfer to Lucknow, he was transferred on the

condition of non-payment of steno allowance. The workman has alleged that he was given positing at Regional

Office, Lucknow as Clerk/Typist just to deprive him of the steno-allowance and future promotion. It has been

further alleged by the workman that the bank in year 1996, without following any due procedure for promotion

to the post of Steno-Officer, promoted on Shri S. Durai Pandian to the post of Steno-Officer, who himself was

recruited as Stenographer and joined the bank on 09.04.1985; however, after completion of promotion process

of Mr. Pandian, the special allowance of workman had been restored on 24.11.1997. The workman has

submitted that promotion of Mr. Pandian was challenged by one Mr. Fateh Singh, who was designated and not

recruited a stenographer, before this Tribunal; and this Tribunal held him eligible for promotion as Steno-

Officer. Accordingly, the workman has stated that since both the promoted candidates viz. Mr S. Durai Pandian

and Fateh Singh is junior to him, therefore, he deserves to be promoted with consequential benefits and has

prayed accordingly.

4.

The management of the Central Bank of India has disputed the claim of the workman through its

written statement; wherein it has submitted that the cause of action pertains to the year 1996; however, the

matter under dispute has been raised with an inordinate delay of more than 20 years, hence, not maintainable;

moreover, the similar cause of action has already been referred in I.D. No. 12/2016 before this Tribunal,

therefore, the proceedings in present case is barred by the principles of res-judicata. The management has

submitted that the transfer request of the workman had been accepted by the Bank for his transfer from Agra

Regional Office to Regional Office, Lucknow vide letter dated 29.07.1988 with certain condition, which are

binding upon him. The management of the Bank has further stated that while seeking his transfer for second

time, back to Lucknow from Etawah, the workman himself foregone his steno allowance while working as clerk

cum typist in Lucknow; accordingly, the management has prayed that the claim of the workman be rejected

being devoid of any merit.

5.

The workman filed its rejoinder; wherein apart from reiterating the averments already made in the

statement of claim, introduced nothing new.

6.

The parties filed documentary evidence. The workman examined himself and one Mr. Phateh Singh in

support of his claim; whereas the management examined Shri Prabhat Kumar Yadav, Sr. Manager in support of

their respective case. The parties cross-examined the witnesses of each other.

7.

Perused entire evidence available on record and scanned entire evidence available on record in light of

the rival pleadings.

8.

The workman has argued that the he was initially appointed in the bank services on 08.04.1985 and

was posted at Regional Office, Etawa as an additional stenographer under jurisdiction of Lucknow Zone;

however, on transfer to Lucknow, at his own request, his steno allowance was stopped and subsequently he was

transferred back to Etawah on 22.08.1990 and was allowed to join back Lucknow, on transfer at his own

request. The workman has vehemently argued that while his posting at Lucknow he was not given steno

allowance, just to deprive him of his legitimate promotion to the post of Steno Officer; and the Bank

management illegally promoted one Mr. S. Durai Pandian as Steno Officer and subsequently one Mr. Fateh

Singh as Steno Officer, at the directions of the Tribunal. He has relied on:

(i)

1983 (47) FLR 394 K. D. Gupta vs Union of Inia & others.

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

427

(ii)

Hon’ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal Nos. 1742-1742 of 2010 between State of West Bengal &

anther vs Kamala Prasad & others decided on 16.02.2010.

(iii)

Hon’ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No. 318 of 2008 between Shakuntala vs State of Haryana

& others decided on 09.06.2010.

(iv)

1981 AIR 1915 Uma Charan vs State of Madhya Pradesh & another.

9.

In rebuttal, the authorized representative of the management has argued that the workman who was

posted in Regional Office, Etawah, sought transfer to Lucknow and on his transfer to Lucknow as per his own

request vide letter dated 29.07.1988, he was not entitled for any officiating allowance to a post attracting special

allowance for a period of 30 moths and promotion for a period of 3 years from the date of his reporting at

Regional Office, Lucknow. The management has argued the having accepted the conditions mentioned in letter

dated 29.07.1988, the workman joined at Lucknow Regional Office; and accordingly, cannot not claim benefits

contrary to the terms of letter dated 29.07.1988. The authorized representative has vehemently argued that the

claim of the workman is stale one, raised after a gap of 21 years; hence not maintainable; moreover, it is barred

by the principle of res-judicata. He has relied upon:

(i)

Hon’ble High Court of Punjab & Haryana in Kartar Singh vs Managing Director, HVPNL &

others in CWP No. 26962 of 2015 (O&M) decided on 04.04.2018.

10.

I have given my thoughtful consideration to the rival submissions of the parties and perused material

available on record.

11.

The workman has come up with a case that he had been transferred to Lucknow twice at his own

request and the management in order to deprive him of his legitimate rights, deliberately exploited his

conditions and did not pay him steno allowance in an illegal manner. He has also come with a case that one Mr.

S. Durai Pandian and another Shri Phateh Singh who were prompted to the post of Steno Officer were junior to

him and he is entitled for promotion.

12.

In rebuttal, the management has contended that the workman had been initially been appointed in

Etawah region and on his transfer to Lucknow region at his own request; and he himself agree to forego the

steno allowance, therefore, he was transferred to Lucknow region depriving him steno allowance for 30 months

and promotion for 3 years, therefore, he cannot claim the same at this highly belated state i.e. after lapse of more

than 21 years.

13.

Having perused pleading of the rival parties and evidence relied upon by them it is admitted case of the

parties that the workman on recruitment as stenographer had been given initial posting at Etawah Region on

08.04.1985; however, he was transferred at his own request to Lucknow regional office vide letter dated

29.07.1988; wherein he was deprived of certain allowances/privileges. The letter dated 29.07.1988 is

reproduced hereunder:

“RO/PRS/5/88/1359

Dated: 29.7.88

MEMO

We are pleased to inform Mr. Vibhakar Kushwaha, Hindi Steno, that his request for transfer to

Lucknow has been considered sympathetically by the Management.

Under instructions from our Zonal office, Agra we advise having transferred services of

Mr. Vibhakar Kushwaha, Hindi Steno to Regional office, Lucknow in the same capacity and on

emoluments as per rules.

It is made clear to Mr. Kushwaha that this transfer has been effected at this own request to suit his

own convenience, he will not be allowed any TA/DA or joining time. He will also not be eligible to

claim officiating allowance to a post attracting special allowance for a period of 30 months and

promotion for a period of 3 years from the date of his reporting at Regional Office, Lucknow.

He shall stand relieved from this office on 8.7.88 after the day’s work with instructions to report

Regional Manager, Lucknow immediately for further instructions.

-sd-

Regional Manager”

It is the case of the management of the Bank that the workman could not be considered for promotion

for the reasons that he was not drawing any steno allowance; accordingly, was treated in clerical cadre.

Moreover, the management of the Bank denied the steno allowance on the basis of above quoted transfer order

428 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

and claims that the workman himself requested for transfer, which resulted into withdrawal of steno allowance;

but from perusal of the above quoted transfer order, it is apparent on the face of record that there is no mention

of foregoing the steno allowance by the workman.

Admittedly the workman had been recruited as Stenographer and he was entitled for special allowance

attracted by the post of Stenographer; moreover, his cadre cannot be changed or treated to be changed by virtue

of denial of any special allowance attracted by the post, as it was in violation of para 5.9 of IBPS, which is as

follows:

31.

A workman will be entitled to a special allowance only so long as he is in charge of such

work or the performance of such duties which attract such allowance. Whether a workman can be

asked to cease to do such work or discharge such duties and consequently cease to draw such

allowance, will depend upon the terms of employment. For instance, a workman who is employed

permanently as a Head Clerk or Stenographer cannot be deprived of his special allowance by asking

him to work as an ordinary clerk or asking him not to work as a Head Clerk or Stenographer. If,

however, a recipient of a special allowance wants to give up the work or duties which entitle him to

the special allowance, he shall if his request is granted, cease to draw the special allowance.”

Here in the instant case, there was no such request from the workman to give up his special allowance

while seeking his transfer; moreover, while seeking transfer the Award Staff Employees, where not required to

give up their special allowance as per provisions of contained in para 2.1 of the circular dated 18.02.1999

regarding ‘Transfer of Award Staff Employees at Their Request From One Station to Another’, as follows:

2.1

Award Staff Employees recruited or appointed in the Bank’s service in the Special

Allowance Carrying posts such as stenos/steno-cum-typist/steno-cum-clerks etc. in clerical cadre

and drivers, armed guards, watchmen, etc. in the sub-ordinate cadre, may seek transfer in the same

capacity without the requirement of foregoing the Special Allowance, to any Branches/Offices in

India and their transfer shall be considered subject to availability of suitable vacancy in such

Special Allowance carrying post at the requested place.”

Schedule-II of 9th Bipartite Settlement, relied upon by the parties revel that certain posts, which are

included in the clerical cadre, including Stenographer, carry special pay. This special pay/allowance is

attributed to them by virtue of additional work allotted to them or due to dealing with some work of special

nature, different from work allotted to other posts included in clerical cadre. Therefore, given special

pay/allowance does not differentiate between posts in clerical cadre; but due to such special allowance, they

could be put in sub cadre, within the clerical cadre; however, denial or non-drawl of this special allowance does

not changes their category or sub-cadre, which was done in the instant case in hand as the workman had been

treated as simple clerk instead of Stenographer, due to non-drawl of steno allowance. Hence, posting of a

‘steno’ as ‘clerk’ does not change his cadre.

Thus, from above quoted circular it is clear that the action of the management in depriving the

workman from special allowance while transferring him was arbitrary and contrary to the Rules; and the

workman was entitled for special allowance during his posting at Regional Office at Lucknow.

14.

Now taking into account the claim of the workman regarding his eligibility for promotion as Steno

Officer, it is admitted fact that the workman had been recruited in the bank services as Hindi Stenographer and

he joined on 08.04.1985; whereas another Stenographer viz. S. Durai Pandian join the bank services on

09.04.1985 was given promotion as Bank Officer. In this regard the workman has relied upon decision of this

Tribunal in Phateh Singh’s case in reference No. L-12012/22/98/IR(B-II) dated 14.12.1998, which is admitted to

the management; wherein this Tribunal held that Mr. S. Durai Pandian was no eligible for promotion as on the

date when he exercised his option for promotion, he did not possess requisite length of qualifying service;

moreover, this Tribunal held said Phateh Singh entitled for promotion instead of Mr. S. Durai Pandian. Hence,

in the circumstances, it could be well presumed that had the workman been given chance to participate in the

selection process, he would have superseded Mr. S. Durai Pandian, an ineligible candidate. Moreover, this

Tribunal vide its award dated 18.12.2000 has held as under:

18.

Thus, on the strength of the discussions made above, it can be safely concluded that the

management of the Central Bank of India did not act legally and justifiably, in not considering

Phateh Singh to the post of Steno Office. The management did not follow the terms of Promotion

Policy Rules, regulating selection to the post of Steno Officer. In the circumstances, Phateh Singh,

being the only eligible candidate with valid irrevocable option, was entitled to the said post w.e.f. the

date, the post of Steno Office was filled by Mr. D. Pandian an ineligible person. In effect, the post

has to be treated vacant, filled by the workman Phateh Singh entitling him to all the service and

pecuniary benefits.”

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

429

15.

The plea taken by the management that the case is being raised by the workman long delay; however,

on failure of the conciliation proceedings, the present industrial dispute has been referred to this Tribunal for

adjudication under powers conferred under Section 10 of the Act; and there is no scope of limitation in the

Section 10 of the Act. Hence, upon reference of an industrial dispute by the appropriate Government, it is duty

casted upon the Labour Court or Industrial Tribunal to answer the terms of reference. Admittedly the present

case is not regarding denial of legitimate rights of the workman; and the workman had been kept on pursuing his

matter with the management and it was only after their denial he approached the Conciliation officer for his

legal remedy, therefore, in the light of the facts and circumstances of the present case the objection raised by the

management regarding delay in raising the present industrial dispute is not tenable in the eye of law. Moreover,

the delay could not be used as tool to deprive the workman of his legitimate rights of proper adjudication of the

case on its merits.

16.

Therefore, in view of the discussions made hereinabove, I am of the considered opinion that the action

of the management of Central Bank of India in depriving promotion to the workman to the post of Steno-officer

is illegal and resultantly, the workman is entitled for promotion as Steno Officer from the date of vacancy on

which S. Durai Pandian was appointed as Steno Officer i.e. He is also entitled for consequential notional

benefits and back wages as well as post retiral benefits.

17.

The reference under adjudication is answered accordingly.

18.

Award as above.

Let two copies of this award be sent to the Ministry for publication.

LUCKNOW

28th January, 2021

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 18 Qjojh] 2021

—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

cSad vkQ cMkSnk ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] y[kuÅ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 48@2008½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18-02-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-12011@66@2008-vkbZvkj ¼ch-II)]

lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 18th February, 2021

S.O. 158.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 48/2008) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Bank of

Baroda and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18.02.2021.

[No. L-12011/66/2008-IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL–CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

PRESENT : P. K. SRIVASTAVA, HJS (Retd.)

I.D. No. 48/2008

Ref. No. L-12011/66/2008-IR(B-II) dated 01.09.2008

BETWEEN :

The General Secretary

Bank of Baroda Staff Association

15/222 A, Civil Lines

Kanpur (UP)

(Espousing cause of Shri Sushil Kumar Wadhwan)

430 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Vs.

The Assistant General Manager

Bank of Baroda

21A/25A, Banerjee Bhawan, Lal Bahadur Shastri Marg

Civil Lines, Allahabad.

AWARD

1.

By order No. L-12011/66/2008-IR(B-II) dated 01.09.2008 the Central Government in the Ministry of

Labour, New Delhi in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub section (1) and sub section (2A) of

Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) referred this industrial dispute between the General

Secretary, Bank of Baroda Staff Association, 15/222 A, Civil Lines, Kanpur (UP) and the Assistant General

Manager, Bank of Baroda, 21A/25A, Banerjee Bhawan, Lal Bahadur , Shastri Marg, Civil Lines, Allahabad for

adjudication.

4.

The reference under adjudication is:

“WHETHER THE ACTION OF THE MANAGEMENT OF BANK OF BARODA IN IMPOSING THE

PUNISHMENT OF ‘DISMISSAL’ FROM SERVICE ‘ON SUSHIL KUMAR WADHAWAN, EC.

NO. 50421 VIDE ORDER DATED 18/08/2003 IS LEGAL AND AND JUSTIFIED? TO WHAT RELIEF

THE CONCERNED WORKMAN IS ENTITLED?”

2.

It is admitted case of the parties that the workman, Sushil Kumar Wadhawan, was working as Head

Cashier, in the Binda branch of the Bank when he was placed under suspension vide order dated 25.05.1999;

and subsequently, was issued a major penalty charge sheet dated 12.01.2001. Shri S. K. Pandey was appointed

as Enquiry Officer, who submitted his enquiry report dated 19.04.2003 before the disciplinary authority. The

Disciplinary Authority furnished a copy of the Inquiry Report vide letter dated 22.04.2003 and subsequently was

dismissed vide order dated 26.07.2003; however, he was afforded an opportunity of personal hearing and after

hearing the workman the final order for punishment dated 18.08.2003 was issued. The appeal of the workman

was also rejected vide order dated 22.04.2004

3.

It has been alleged by the workman that the prosecution did not prove the documents presented by the

Presenting Officer. It has also been alleged by the workman that his representation against the findings of the

Inquiry Officer was not considered by the Disciplinary Authority while passing impugned order. Accordingly,

the workman has prayed that the Departmental proceedings which were conducted in violation to the principles

of natural justice is liable to be set aside and impugned order be quashed.

4.

The management of the Bank in its written statement has denied the allegations of the workman and

has defended its domestic proceedings with submission that the workman had been afforded all opportunity

given under rules the principles of natural justice were fully complied with; hence, there is no anomaly with it;

and accordingly, has prayed that domestic enquiry proceedings conducted by it may be upheld and the action of

the Bank vide order dated 18.08.2003 be declared just, fair and legal without any benefit to the workman

concerned.

5.

The workman has filed rejoinder reiterating the averments already made in the statement of claim.

6.

The parties filed documents in support of their respective case. Following preliminary issues were

framed in the presence of the parties vide order dated 09.03.2010:

(i) Whether the domestic inquiry was fair and proper?

(ii) Whether the findings of inquiry officer are perverse?

After framing of preliminary issues, the parties the parties were called upon to adduce their evidence on

preliminary issues, which they foregone; and accordingly, date was fixed for arguments on preliminary issues.

The workman did not turn for oral submissions; accordingly, following orders were passed, on preliminary

issues, vide order dated 27.02.2020:

“Thus, from the facts & circumstances of the case and discussions made hereinabove, I am of the

considered opinion that the disciplinary enquiry, against the workman, was conducted in accordance

with the principles of natural justice and the workman was afforded all reasonable opportunity to

defend himself; and also that the findings of the Inquiry Officer do not suffer with the vice of

perversity. As such, the issue No. 01 & 02 is decided in favour of the management. The parties are

called upon to forward their argument over the quantum of punishment u/s 11A of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947”

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

431

7.

When the workman or his authorizes representative did not turn up for oral submissions, the argument

of the management was heard on the point of quantum of punishment under Section 11 A of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947. Also, the parties were afforded opportunity to file their written submission.

8.

Heard, authorized representative of the management and perused entire material available on record.

9.

Now taking up the third issue, it is well settled that the Labour Court has ample power under section

11-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to substitute a lesser punishment, taking into consideration the facts

and circumstances of the case. Moreover, the principle of proportionality calls for interference of this Court into

the punishment imposed by the management i.e. of removal in view of law in Joseph Solomon vs. Presiding

Officer, Labour Court, U.P., Dehradun & another 2012 (134) FLR 424.

10.

In the instant case the workman was charge sheeted for his alleged misconduct of embezzlement, gross

negligence and acting in manner prejudicial to the interest of the Bank; which had been found proved by the

inquiry officer and accordingly, the workman had been punished with punishment of dismissal without notice.

11.

Hon’ble Apex Court in B.C. Chayurvedi v. Union of India, (1995) 6 SCC 749 while discussing about

the scope of judicial review, in disciplinary matters, has observed as under:

“The High Court/Tribunal, while exercising the power of judicial review, cannot normally substitute

its own conclusion on penalty and impose some other penalty. If the punishment imposed by the

disciplinary authority or the appellate authority shocks the conscience of the High Court/Tribunal, it

would appropriately mould the relief, either directing the disciplinary/appellate authority to

reconsider the penalty imposed, or to shorten the litigation, it may itself, in exceptional and rare

cases, imposed appropriate punishment with cogent reasons in support thereof.”

In DG, RPF vs. Sai Babu (2003) 4 SCC 331, Hon’ble Apex Court has observed that:

“6…………. Normally, the punishment imposed by a disciplinary authority should not be disturbed

by the High Court or a tribunal except in appropriate cases that too only after reaching a conclusion

that the punishment imposed is grossly or shockingly disproportionate, after examining all the

relevant factors including the nature of charges proved against, the past conduct, penalty imposed

earlier, the nature of duties assigned having due regard to their sensitiveness, exactness expected of

an discipline required to be maintained, and the department/establishment which the delinquent

person concerned works.”

In United Commercial Bank vs. P.C. Kakkar (2003) 4 SCC 364 Hon’ble Apex Court on review of a

long line of cases and the principles of judicial review of administrative action under English law summarized

the legal position in the following words:

“11. The common thread running through in all these decisions is that the court should not

interfere with the administrators’ decision unless it was illogical or suffers from procedural

impropriety or was shocking to the conscience of the court, in the sense that it was in defiance

of logic or moral standards. In view of what has been stated in Wednesbury case the court

would not go into the correctness of the choice made by the administrator open to him and the

court should not substitute its decision to that of the administrator. The scope of judicial

review is judicial review is limited to the deficiency in decision-making process and not the

decision.

12.

To put it differently, unless the punishment imposed by the disciplinary authority or the

appellate authority shocks the conscience of the court/tribunal, there is no scope for

interference. Further, to shorten litigation it may, in exceptional and rare cases, impose

appropriate punishment by recording cogent reasons in support thereof.”

In Union of India vs. S.S. Ahluwalia (2007) 7 SCC 257 Hon’ble Supreme Court reiterated the legal

position as follows:

“8.

……… The scope of judicial review in the matter of imposition of penalty as a

result of disciplinary proceedings is very limited. The court can interfere with the

punishment only if it finds the same to be shockingly disproportionate to the charges found

to be proved.”

In State of Meghalaya v. Mecken Singh N. Marak (2008) 7 SCC 580 Hon’ble Supreme Court stated

that:

“The punishment imposed by the disciplinary authority or the appellate authority unless

shocking to the conscience of the court, cannot be subjected to judicial review.

432 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

12.

Hon’ble Apex Court in Administrator, Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli vs. Gulbhia M. Lad

(2010) 2 SCC (L&S) 101 has observed that

“The legal position is fairly well settled that while exercising the power of judicial review, the High

Court or a Tribunal cannot interfere with the discretion exercised by the disciplinary authority,

and/or on appeal the appellate authority with regard to the imposition of punishment unless such

discretion suffers from illegality or material procedural irregularity or that would shock the

conscience of the court/tribunal. The exercise of discretion in imposition of punishment by the

disciplinary authority or appellate authority is dependent on host of factors such as gravity of

misconduct, past conduct, the nature of duties assigned to the delinquent, responsibility of the

position that the delinquent holds, previous penalty, if any, and the discipline required to be

maintained in the department or establishment he works. Ordinarily the court or the tribunal would

not substitute its opinion on reappraisal of facts.

13.

In the instant case the workman, received money from the accounts holders to deposit the same into

their respective account but instead of depositing he misappropriate the same and further made number of acts

of omission and commission, which were prejudicial to the interest of the Bank.

Needless to point out that the misappropriation of the Bank’s money speaks ill of the honesty and

integrity of the workman concerned. This is definitely an act prejudicial to the interest of the Bank, which leads

to loss of faith in the workman. In Air India Corporation Bombay vs. V.A. Ravellow 1972 (25) FLR 319 (SC) it

has been observed that:

“Once the employer has lost the confidence in the employee and the bona fide loss of confidence is

affirmed, the order of punishment must be considered to be immune from challenge, for the reason

that discharging the office of trust and confidence requires absolute integrity, and in a case of loss

of confidence, reinstatement cannot be directed.”

In Knhaiyalal Agarwal and others vs. Factory Manager, Gwaliar Sugar Co. Ltd. AIR 2001 SC 3645

Hon’ble Apex court laid down the test for loss of confidence to find out as to whether there was bona fide loss

of confidence in the employee, observing that:

“(i)

the workman is holding the position of trust and confidence; (ii) by abusing such position,

be commits act which results in forfeiting the same; and (iii) to continue him in

service/establishment would be embarrassing the inconvenient to the employee, or would be

detrimental to the discipline or security of the establishment. Loss of confidence cannot be

subjective, based upon the mind of the management. Objective facts which would lead to a definite

inference of apprehension in the mind of the management, regarding trust worthiness or reliability

of the employee, must be alleged and proved.”

In State Bank of India and another v. Bela Bagchi and others AIR 2005 SC 3272, repelled the

contention that even if by the misconduct of the employee the employer does not suffer any financial loss, he

can be removed from service in a case of loss of confidence.

14.

Thus, the Bank being a financial institution dealing with the public money, the employees of the Bank

are required to exhibit utmost honesty and integrity in day to day transaction/functioning. The act of dishonesty

or fraud or misappropriation lowers down the reputation of Bank in public. The public lose their confidence in

Bank, which affects Bank’s business and finally the national economy.

15.

Hon’ble Apex Court in (2011) 1 Supreme Court Cases (L&S) 721 has observed that:

“7.

It is now well settled that the courts will not act as an appellate court and reassess the

evidence led in the domestic enquiry, nor interfere on the ground that another view is possible on the

material on record. If the inquiry has been fairly and properly held and the findings are based on

evidence, the question of adequacy of the evidence or the reliable nature of the evidence will not be

grounds for interfering with the findings in departmental enquiries. Therefore, the courts will not

interfere with findings of fact recorded in departmental inquiries, except where such findings are

based on no evidence or where they are clearly perverse. The test to find out perversity is to see

whether a tribunal acting reasonably could have arrived at such conclusion or findings, on the

material on record. The courts will however interfere with the findings in disciplinary matters, if

principles of natural justice or statutory regulations have been violated or if the order is found to be

arbitrary, capricious, mala fide or based on extraneous considerations.”

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

433

16.

In the instant case the charge of misappropriation of the Bank’s money was found to be proved and

principles of natural justice were properly observed while conducting the departmental inquiry; and also the

findings of the Inquiry Officer were not found to be perverse; accordingly, the workman was awarded

punishment of dismissal without notice, which cannot be said to be disproportionate or harsh to the proved

misconduct, at any stretch of imagination.

Therefore, in view of the facts and the circumstances of the case; and law cited hereinabove, there is no

justification in interfering with the punishment imposed upon the workman by the Disciplinary Authority for

proved gross misconduct of ‘misappropriation’. Accordingly, I am of the considered opinion that the workman

is not entitled for any relief.

17.

Reference under adjudication is answered accordingly.

18.

Award as above.

Let two copies of this award be sent to the Ministry for publication.

LUCKNOW

21st January, 2020

P.K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 18 Qjojh] 2021

—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

lSUVªy cSad vkQ bafM;k ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] y[kuÅ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 31@2004½ dks izdkf'kr

djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18-02-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-12011@237@2003-vkbZvkj ¼ch-II)]

lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 18th February, 2021

S.O. 159.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 31/2004) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Central Bank

of India, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18.02.2021.

[No. L-12011/237/2003-IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL–CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

PRESENT: P. K. SRIVASTAVA HJS (Retd.)

I.D. No. 31/2004

Ref. No. L-12011/237/2003-IR(B-II) dated: 17.02.2004

BETWEEN :

The Regional Secretary

Central Bank of India Employees Union

538, Swaroop Nagar, Chabhai

Bareilly (UP)

(Espousing case of Sri Diwan Giri)

Vs

The Regional Manager

Central Bank of India

Regional Office, B-88, Civil Lines

Bareilly (UP) 243001

434 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AWARD

1.

By order No. L-12011/237/2003-IR(B-II) dated: 17.02.2004 the Central Government in the Ministry of

Labour, New Delhi in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub section (1) and sub section (2A) of

Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) referred this industrial dispute for adjudication.

2.

The reference under adjudication is:

“WHETHER HE ACTION OF THE MANAGEMENT OF CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA IN

NOT GIVING PROMOTION TO SHRI DIWAN GIRI, CLERK W.E.F. 01.01.1990 IS JUST,

FAIR AND LEGAL? IF NOT, WHAT RELIEF HE IS ENTITLED TO?”

3.

The case of the workman, Diwan Giri, in brief, is that he had been appointed in sub-ordinate cadre in

the Bank on 01.01.1990 and had been declared successful in the test and interview, conducted for promotion to

the post of Clerk. The workman has alleged that the Manager of Meergunj Branch, Sri R.K. Bansal filed a FIR

against the workman for alleged manhandling with him and a case was registered bearing No. 1379/1994 u/s

323/504/332 of IPC. The workman has submitted that after trail he had been acquitted from charges by the

competent court of law vide order dated 12.12.1994 and when he represented for his promotion w.e.f.

01.01.1990, the management, issued charge sheet dated 26.07.1996 in pursuance to show cause memo dated

23.06.1990 and after conducting a departmental inquiry; where principles of natural justice were not duly

observed was punished with punishment of Censure. It has been alleged by the workman that the Departmental

proceedings which were conducted in violation to the principles of natural justice is liable to be set aside and he

be held entitled for promotion to the post of Clerk w.e.f. 01.01.1990 with consequential benefits.

4.

The management of the Bank in its written statement has denied the allegations of the workman and

has submitted that since the disciplinary action was pending against the workman as such the promotion could

not be released; however, confirmation and judgment from the Court in Criminal Case is not a binding in the

internal aspects of the bank. The management has submitted since his reply of the workman, to the memo dated

23.06.1990, was not found satisfactory therefor, departmental proceedings were initiated against the workman

for alleged gross-misconduct of misbehavior and assaulting the Branch Manager and disorderly behavior in the

bank premises; however, after inquiry, the charges were found to be partially proved, therefore, the workman

had been punished with the punishment of Censure. The management has also submitted that the workman was

afforded all reasonable opportunity to defend himself, inasmuch as the departmental proceedings were

conducted in accordance with the principles of natural justice and after thorough appreciation of the findings of

the inquiry officer, the workman was imposed with the punishment of Censure. As regards acquittal of the

workman in criminal case, the management has submitted that the same was not clean acquittal but after giving

him benefit of doubt, therefore, it had no effect on the domestic inquiry. The management has submitted that

the punishment order is well reasoned and speaking; therefore, the same is liable to be up held, without any

relief to the workman concerned.

6.

The workman’s union has filed its rejoinder, reiterating the averments already made in the statement of

claim.

7.

The parties have filed documents in support of its case. The workman filed his affidavit in support of

pleadings; but management neither cross-examined him nor adduced its oral evidence. Since the alleged action

of the management for non-grant of promotion to the workman was based on the outcome of the domestic

inquiry, therefore, following preliminary issues were framed vide order dated 23.12.2020:

(i)

Whether the domestic inquiry conducted by the management is fair and proper; and

(ii)

Whether the findings of inquiry officer are perverse?

(iii)

Whether the punishment imposed is proportionate to the charges or not?

The oral submissions of the learned counsel of both the parties had been heard at length and

documents relied upon by the parties had been perused.

9.

It had been alleged by the workman that the Departmental proceedings which were conducted in

violation to the principles of natural justice is liable to be set aside. Moreover, he has also come up with a case

that there was not disciplinary action pending against him against the dated of judgment of criminal court dated

13.12.1994 and when he pressed for promotion w.e.f. 01.01.1990, he was illegally served upon a charge sheet

dated 26.07.1996 was served upon him, ignoring his acquittal from Criminal Court on same charges and after

conducting a defective domestic inquiry, he was not given promotion firstly, on the grounds that an inquiry is

pending against him and subsequently, on the basis of punishment awarded to him. The workman has also

alleged that the Disciplinary Authority conducted inquiry in violation to provisions contained in Para No. 19.11,

Chapter XIX of Bipartite Settlement dated 19.10.1966 in an illegal manner.

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

435

10.

However, in rebuttal the management has come up with a case, that the workman who was indulged in

disruptive activities at work place and not only used abusive language but also hurled his seniors causing utter

indiscipline, was issued a show cause dated 23.06.1990; and subsequently, was issued a charge sheet dated

26.07.1996 to the workman and after conducting a detailed inquiry, wherein the principles of natural justice

were thoroughly observed, the workman was found partially guilty for the alleged charges and resultantly, the

workman was punished with Censer. It is also the case of the management that the FIR was also lodged against

the workman for similar deed; wherein he was acquitted, giving him benefit of doubt; hence the acquittal was

not clean. The management had argued that the management had right to proceed with the departmental inquiry

even after acquittal of the workman in criminal proceedings as departmental proceedings and criminal

proceedings stand in a different footing; hence the denial of promotion to the promotion due to pendency of

departmental proceeding and later on due to punishment award is just and legal.

10.

Having given thoughtful consideration to the rival contentions of the learned counsel of both the

parties, the issued framed vide order dated 23.12.2020 are taken up for consideration hereunder:

Issue No. 01:-

11.

As regards first issue regarding fairness of the domestic inquiry, the workman’s union has taken a stand

that the workman’s request for dropping the charges was not adhered to by the management of the Bank on the

basis of his acquittal in the criminal case with same charges and secondly that the principles of natural justice

was duly followed during the departmental proceedings. The workman did not turn up cross-examination in

support of his affidavit; moreover, from perusal of the inquiry proceedings on record, it is evident that the

workman had been supplied copy of charge sheet along with documents relied upon before the inquiry, he was

given opportunity to be represented by defence representative; apart from cross-examining the prosecution

witness and adducing his defence. During inquiry the workman was granted adjournment/time in absence of his

defence representative; moreover, he also filed with written submission before the inquiry. Though the

workman has pleaded that there was violation of principles of natural justice; but failed to substantiate the same

through cogent evidence i.e. documentary or oral. On the contrary, from perusal of the inquiry proceedings,

available on record, it is established that the domestic inquiry was fairly conducted by the management and the

workman had been given all reasonable opportunity to defend himself during the course of the inquiry.

Also, Hon’ble Supreme Court in Karnataka Power Transmission Corpn. Ltd. vs Sri C. Nagaraju &

Anr. 2019 LLR 1181 has observed as under:

“9.

Acquittal by a criminal court would not debar an employer from exercising the power to

conduct departmental proceedings in accordance with the rules and regulations. The two

proceedings, criminal and departmental, are entirely different. They operate in different fields and

have different objectives. Ajit Kumar Nag (Supra). In the disciplinary proceedings, the question in

whether the Respondent is guilty of such conduct as would merit his removal from service or a

lesser punishment, as the case may be, whereas in the criminal proceedings, the question is whether

the offences registered against him under the PC Act are established, and if established, what

sentence should be imposed upon him. The standard of proof, the mode of inquiry and the rules

governing inquiry and trial in both the cases are significantly distinct and different. State of

Rajasthan v. B. K. Meena, (1996) 6 SCC 417.”

Hence, from perusal of the above quoted law, it is crystal clear that the submissions of the workman’s

union that the management should not have proceeded with the departmental inquiry on his acquittal in the

criminal proceedings is not acceptable; moreover, the departmental inquiry, conducted by the management was

fair and proper. Accordingly, the issue No. 01 is decided in favour of the management.

Issue No. 02:-

12.

As regards, issue No. 2, it is apparent on the face of record that the workman participated in the

departmental proceedings and had been afforded all reasonable opportunity to defend himself; moreover,

acquittal of the workman in the criminal case has no effect on the ongoing departmental action. Also, the

workman’s union has not suggested at any juncture that the findings of the inquiry officer was perverse or

inconsistent with the evidence collected by him during the course of inquiry. Moreover, form perusal of the

cross-examination of the prime witness before the inquiry, the complainant, Shri R. K. Bansal, Branch Manager

with whom the workman misbehaved, stood by his compliant and also before the criminal trail he corroborated

his complaint with his statement. Also, the inquiry officer on over consideration of the entire evidence available

on record, submitted his findings before the Disciplinary Authority with conclusion the charges ‘partially

proved’; hence, I am of the considered opinion that the findings of the inquiry officer were not perverse and the

second issue is also decided in favour of the management.

436 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Issue No. 03:-

13.

Now taking up the third issue, It is well settled that the Labour Court has ample power under section

11-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to substitute a lesser punishment, taking into consideration the facts

and circumstances of the case. Moreover, the principle of proportionality calls for interference of this Court into

the punishment imposed by the management i.e. of removal in view of law in Joseph Solomon vs. Presiding

Officer, Labour Court, U.P., Dehradun & another 2012 (134) FLR 424.

14.

In the instant case the workman was charge sheeted for his alleged misbehavior, assaulting the

Manager and disorderly behavior in the bank premises; which has been found partially proved by the inquiry

officer and accordingly, the workman had been punished with ‘Censure’; and the workman had been deprived of

promotion due to pending departmental inquiry.

15.

Hon’ble Apex Court in B.C. Chayurvedi v. Union of India, (1995) 6 SCC 749 while discussing about

the scope of judicial review, in disciplinary matters, has observed as under:

“The High Court/Tribunal, while exercising the power of judicial review, cannot normally substitute

its own conclusion on penalty and impose some other penalty. If the punishment imposed by the

disciplinary authority or the appellate authority shocks the conscience of the High Court/Tribunal,

it would appropriately mould the relief, either directing the disciplinary/appellate authority to

reconsider the penalty imposed, or to shorten the litigation, it may itself, in exceptional and rare

cases, imposed appropriate punishment with cogent reasons in support thereof.”

In DG, RPF vs. Sai Babu (2003) 4 SCC 331, Hon’ble Apex Court has observed that:

“6…………. Normally, the punishment imposed by a disciplinary authority should not be disturbed

by the High Court or a tribunal except in appropriate cases that too only after reaching a conclusion

that the punishment imposed is grossly or shockingly disproportionate, after examining all the

relevant factors including the nature of charges proved against, the past conduct, penalty imposed

earlier, the nature of duties assigned having due regard to their sensitiveness, exactness expected of

an discipline required to be maintained, and the department/establishment which the delinquent

person concerned works.”

In United Commercial Bank vs. P.C. Kakkar (2003) 4 SCC 364 Hon’ble Apex Court on review of a

long line of cases and the principles of judicial review of administrative action under English law summarized

the legal position in the following words:

“11. The common thread running through in all these decisions is that the court should not

interfere with the administrators’ decision unless it was illogical or suffers from procedural

imp0ropriety or was shocking to the conscience of the court, in the sense that it was in

defiance of logic or moral standards. In view of what has been stated in Wednesbury case the

court would not go into the correctness of the choice made by the administrator open to him

and the court should not substitute its decision to that of the administrator. The scope of

judicial review is judicial review is limited to the deficiency in decision-making process and

not the decision.

12.

To put it differently, unless the punishment imposed by the disciplinary authority or the

appellate authority shocks the conscience of the court/tribunal, there is no scope for

interference. Further, to shorten litigation it may, in exceptional and rare cases, impose

appropriate punishment by recording cogent reasons in support thereof.”

In Union of India vs. S.S. Ahluwalia (2007) 7 SCC 257 Hon’ble Supreme Court reiterated the legal

position as follows:

“8.

……… The scope of judicial review in the matter of imposition of penalty as a

result of disciplinary proceedings is very limited. The court can interfere with the punishment

only if it finds the same to be shockingly disproportionate to the charges found to be proved.”

In State of Meghalaya v. Mecken Singh N. Marak (2008) 7 SCC 580 Hon’ble Supreme Court stated

that:

“The punishment imposed by the disciplinary authority or the appellate authority unless

shocking to the conscience of the court, cannot be subjected to judicial review.

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

437

16.

Hon’ble Apex Court in Administrator, Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli vs. Gulbhia M. Lad

(2010) 2 SCC (L&S) 101 has observed that

“The legal position is fairly well settled that while exercising the power of judicial review, the High

Court or a Tribunal cannot interfere with the discretion exercised by the disciplinary authority,

and/or on appeal the appellate authority with regard to the imposition of punishment unless such

discretion suffers from illegality or material procedural irregularity or that would shock the

conscience of the court/tribunal. The exercise of discretion in imposition of punishment by the

disciplinary authority or appellate authority is dependent on host of factors such as gravity of

misconduct, past conduct, the nature of duties assigned to the delinquent, responsibility of the

position that the delinquent holds, previous penalty, if any, and the discipline required to be

maintained in the department or establishment he works. Ordinarily the court or the tribunal

would not substitute its opinion on reappraisal of facts.

17.

Moreover, the Banks being financial institution; where the hard earned money of the public at large is

kept, and any disorderly atmosphere in the Bank premises may lead to loss to trust of the depositors on the

Banking institution; which may ultimately lead to collapse of financial system of the country and the same is not

permissible at all. Hon’ble Apex Court in (2011) 1 Supreme Court Cases (L&S) 721 has observed that:

“7.

It is now well settled that the courts will not act as an appellate court and reassess the

evidence led in the domestic enquiry, nor interfere on the ground that another view is possible on

the material on record. If the inquiry has been fairly and properly held and the findings are based

on evidence, the question of adequacy of the evidence or the reliable nature of the evidence will not

be grounds for interfering with the findings in departmental enquiries. Therefore the courts will not

interfere with findings of fact recorded in departmental inquiries, except where such findings are

based on no evidence or where they are clearly perverse. The test to find out perversity is to see

whether a tribunal acting reasonably could have arrived at such conclusion or findings, on the

material on record. The courts will however interfere with the findings in disciplinary matters, if

principles of natural justice or statutory regulations have been violated or if the order is found to be

arbitrary, capricious, mala fide or based on extraneous considerations.”

18.

In the instant case, the workman was punished with the punishment of ‘Censure’; however, he was not

grated promotion due to reason that the departmental inquiry was contemplated against him. Hon’ble Bombay

High Court in Western Coalfield Ltd. vs Santosh Kumar and others 2018 LLR 764 has observed that hurling of

filthy abusive language at a senior officer justifies dismissal; whereas in the present case, the workman had been

punished with ‘Censure’, the charges being partially proved; and was not grated promotion as the departmental

inquiry was contemplated against him. Therefore, under the facts and the circumstances of the case in hand and

considering the laws pronounced by Hon’ble Supreme Court and Hon’ble High Courts, there is no justification

in interfering with the punishment imposed upon the workman. Accordingly, the workman is not entitled for

any relief.

19.

Award as above.

Let two copies of this award be sent to the Ministry for publication.

LUCKNOW

28th January, 2021

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 18 Qjojh] 2021

—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

cSad vkQ cMkSnk ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS?kksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] y[kuÅ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 45@2013½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18-02-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-12012@51@2012-vkbZvkj ¼ch-II)]

lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

438 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 18th February, 2021

S.O. 160.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 45/2013) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Bank of

Baroda, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18.02.2021.

[No. L-12012/51/2012-IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL–CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

PRESENT: P. K. SRIVASTAVA, HJS (Retd.)

I.D. No. 45/2013

Ref. No. L-12012/51/2012-IR(B-II) dated 27.05.2013

BETWEEN :

Sh. Mehboob ali, S/o Sh. M. Ayub

R/o – 9, Gulzar Colony, Behind Nav Bharat Times

Lucknow.

AND

1. Chair Man Cum Managing Director

Bank of Baroda, Kendriya Office

Mumbai

2. Asstt. General Manager

Incharge of the Region

Regional Office, IInd Floor, V-23, Vibuti Khand

Gomti Nagar, Lucknow – 226010.

AWARD

1.

By order No. L-12012/51/2012-IR(B-II) dated 27.05.2013, the Central Government in the Ministry of

Labour, New Delhi in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub section (1) and sub section (2A) of

Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) referred this industrial dispute for adjudication.

2.

The reference under adjudication is:

“KYA PRABANDAK, BANK OF BARODA, LUCKNOW DWARA SHRI MAHBOOB ALI PUTRA

SHIR MO. AYYUB DAILY WAGER KO USKE SAATH KE SUM STAFF KO NAUKARI MEIN

RAKHNE KI TAARIKH SE USE NAUKARI NA DIYA JANA NYAYOCHIT EVAM VAIDH HAI?

YADI NAHI TO KAAMGAAR KIS RAAHAT KO PANE KA HAKDAAR HAI?”

3.

The case of the workman, in brief, is that he had been engaged as Peon by the Bank and worked for

total 178 days in two spells of 89 days each i.e. from 17.11.1986 to 13.02.1987 and from 15.03.1988 to

11.06.1988. The workman has submitted that he submitted an application, in response to an advertisement

dated 24.09.1991, within prescribed period, which provide that those who have worked for more nan 90 days

with the Bank during period from 01.01.1982 to 21.12.1990 may apply against future vacancies of sub staff

cadre in the Bank. The workman has submitted that subsequently, the bank vide letter dated 13.09.1994, sought

certain documents from him, which he furnished to the Bank in reply. The workman has alleged that although

he was eligible for appointment even then the bank did not appoint him; rather it appointed other juniors in

violation to the provisions of Section 25 G and 25 H of the Act. Accordingly, the workman has prayed that he

be held entitled for appointment in the Bank services.

4.

The management of the Bank has disputed the claim of the workman by filing its written statement;

wherein it has submitted that the workman’s claim was not maintainable; firstly, he was not engaged in

temporary capacity; secondly he was not passed class VII when he claims to have been engaged as daily wager

for first time; thirdly, he was not registered with the Employment Exchange during period he claims to have

worked as daily wager; thirdly, from perusal of his transfer certificate the date of admission of the workman is

87-89 as regular student of the session staring in 1987 and remained in the school during the session ending

May, 1990 on being promoted and left the school on 30.06.1990, then how he could a regular student during his

second spell of engagement as Daily Wager. Moreover, the Bank has submitted that there was no violation of

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

439

any of the provision of the Section 25 G and 25 H of the Act, since there existed no employer employee

relationship between the Bank and the workman concerned. Accordingly, the management of the Bank has

prayed that the claim of the workman be rejected being devoid of any merit.

5.

The workman has field its rejoinder statement; wherein apart from reiterating the submissions already

made in the statement of claim, the workman has introduced nothing new.

6.

The parties filed documentary evidence in support of their respective claim. The workman examined

himself; whereas the management examined Shri Rajesh Kumar, Branch Manager in support of their pleadings.

Parties afforded opportunity to cross-examine witnesses of each other apart from forwarding oral as well as

written submissions.

7.

Heard the authorized representative of the management and perused entire material available on record.

8.

The learned counsel for workman has submitted that the workman had been engaged by the Bank for

two spells i.e. from 17.11.1986 to 13.02.1987 and from 15.03.1988 to 11.06.1988 for 89-89 days each; but he

was not given appointment by the Bank in pursuance to his application dated 15.10.1991, which he preferred in

response to the advertisement dated 24.09.1991, in spite of the fact that he fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The

learned counsel has also contended that the workman worked with the management of the bank for 178 days

only; hence, it not a case of violation of provisions of section 25 F of the Act; rather the claim of the workman

for induction into the bank services is on the basis of the advertisement dated 24.09.1991 and retaining other

juniors in the services of the bank, therefore, their case is regarding violation of provisions of section 25 G & 25

H of the Act. The learned counsel has also argued that the preliminary objection raised by the management is

not maintainable firstly, there is no limitation provided under the Act for reference under Section 10 of the Act;

and secondly that the cause of action raised after decline of the management for settlement of grievances vide

their letter dated 23.03.2009 and thereafter, raised the matter before appropriate authority/RLC (C) under Act in

the year 2011, which subsequently, referred to this Tribunal in the year 2013.

9.

In rebuttal, the learned counsel for the management has argued that the case of the workman is barred

by the limitation as it has been raised after an in ordinate delay of 20 years. He has also contended that the

workman was not found eligible for empanelment for the reasons that he did not fulfil the eligibility conditions

as he was not engaged as temporary basis and did not possess requisite qualification i.e. VII pass, at the time of

this first engagement; moreover and he was not registered with the employment Exchange during the period of

his engagement in two different spells and further, that he could not pursue his education as regular student at

the time of his engagement as daily wager with the bank. The learned counsel of the management of the bank

has relied upon:

I.

2007 LAB I.C. 270 Regional Manager, SBI v. Mahatma Mishra, Hon’ble Supreme Court.

II.

2006 LAB I.C. 3060 Manager (now Regional Director) R.B.I. v. Gopinath Sharma, Hon’ble Supreme

Court.

III.

2002 (94) FLR 98 M/s Steel Authority of India v. P.O., Labour Court, Bokaro & another, Hon’ble

Jharkhand High Court

IV.

2000 (87) FLR 97 Telecom District Manager & others v. A.A. Angali & others, Hon’ble Karnataka

High Court.

V.

2004 (103) FLR 933 Narendra Kumar v. Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal,

Kanpur & another, Hon’ble Allahabad High Court.

VI.

2009 (123) FLR 700 State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur v. Anurag Sharma & others, Hon’ble Allahabad

High Court.

VII.

2010 LAB I.C. 2890 State of Orissa & Anr. v. Rajkishore Nanda & others, Hon’ble Supreme Court.

VIII.

2012 (132) FLR 785 General Manager (Operations) State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur v. Rajeev Sharma

& another, Hon’ble Allahabad High Court.

IX.

2001 (91) FLR 824 Pramod Kumar v. State of Bihar & others, Hon’ble Patna High Court.

X.

1997 LAB I.C. 2075 Himanshu Kumar Vidyarthi & others v. State of Bihar & others, Hon’ble Supreme

court.

XI.

2004 (101) FLR 867 Regional Manager, State Bank of India, Kanpur v. The Presiding Officer, Central

Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Kanpur & another, Hon’ble Allahabad High

Court.

440 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

XII.

2005 (104) FLR 65 Nagar Panchayat Gajraula, Moradabad v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court,

Rampur & others, Hon’ble Allahabad High Court.

XIII.

2005 (104) FLR 893 Union Bank of India v. Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Kanpur & others, Hon’ble Allahabad High Court.

10.

I have given my thoughtful consideration to the rival contensions of the learned counsel of both the

parties and scanned the entire evidence available on record in light thereto.

11.

Before entering to the merits of the case, it is has to be looked into that the management of the Bank

has raised preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the case due to inordinate delay of more than 20

years in raising the present dispute in terms of provisions contained in Section 2A (3) of the Act. In rebuttal, the

workman has submitted that case has been referred to this Tribunal for adjudication by the appropriate

Government and this Tribunal is duty bound to answer the same on the terms of reference; moreover, the

provisions of Section 2A (3) of the Act is not applicable to the present case. The Section 2A of the Act reads as

under:

2A. Dismissal, etc., of an individual workman to be deemed to be an industrial dispute. – (1) Where

any employer discharges, dismisses, retrenches or otherwise terminates the services of an individual

workman, any dispute or difference between that workman and his employer connected with, or

arising out of, such discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or termination shall be deemed to be an

industrial dispute notwithstanding that no other workman nor any union of workmen is a party to the

dispute.

(2)

Notwithstanding anything contained in section 10, any such workman as is specified in sub-

section (1) may, make an application direct to the Labour Court or Tribunal for adjudication of the

dispute referred to therein after the expiry of forty-five days from the date he has made the

application to the Conciliation Officer of the appropriate government for conciliation of the dispute,

and in receipt of such application the Labour Court or Tribunal shall have powers and jurisdiction to

adjudicate upon the dispute, as if it were a dispute referred to it by the appropriate Government in

accordance with the provisions of this Act and all the provisions of this Act shall apply in relation to

such adjudication as they apply in relation to an industrial dispute referred to it by the appropriate

Government.

(3)

The application referred to in sub-section (2) shall be made to the Labour Court or Tribunal

before the expiry of three years from the date of discharge, dismissal, retreatment or otherwise

termination of service as specified in sub-section (1).

A bare perusal of the above quoted section revels that the limitation prescribed in the sub-section (3) of

Section 2A is regarding filing of an application before the Labour Court or Tribunal with regard to the filing of

an application directly before the Labour Court or Tribunal, after expiry of 45 days from the date it moved an

application before the Conciliation Officer under sub-section (2) of Section 2A; and there is no bar on

entertaining an industrial dispute duly referred by the appropriate Government under Section 10 of the Act.

Also, Hon’ble Apex Court in Ajaib Singh vs. Sirhind Co-operative Marketing-cum-Processing Services

Society Ltd. & another 1999 LAB IC 1435 where there was admitted delay of seven years has held that the Court

can mould relief by refusing back wages or directing payment of part of back wages. Likewise, Hon’ble

Supreme Court in 2001 SCC (L&S) 105 Gurmail Singh vs. Principal, Govt. College of Education & others, has

laid down that ‘the Labour Court cannot dismiss the case of the workman merely on the ground of delay. If the

order of dismissal is challenged belatedly, the dispute would still continue for adjudication, the only question

would be to deprive back wages for the period of delay in raising such a dispute if on merits it is to succeed.’

Further, Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in 1994 LLR 29 The Chief General Manager, State Bank of India, Chief

Office, Lucknow vs. B.C. Verma & another; wherein the question for consideration before the Hon’ble High

Court was whether inaction or delay in raising industrial dispute by the workman can be condoned; Hon’ble

High Court observed as under:

“In the present case, Section 10(1) may be read along with Section 10 (5). Both the subsections read

together lead to conclusion that ‘at any time’ the Reference can be made in the exercise of the

administrative power by the Central Government provided there exists an industrial dispute or the

same is apprehended. He use of expression “at any time’ in both the sub-sections clearly indicates

that legislature never intended any limitation to be imposed for making reference.”

In the present case, the workman has contended that the cause of action raised after decline of the

management for settlement of grievances vide their letter dated 23.03.2009 and thereafter, he raised the matter

before Cancellation Officer under Act in the year 2011; and on failure of the conciliation proceedings, he

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

441

forwarded its ‘Failure of Conciliation Report’ to the appropriate Government, which after considering the

Failure of Conciliation Report, referred the present industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication under

powers conferred under Section 10 of the Act. Hence, upon reference of an industrial dispute by the appropriate

Government, it is duty casted upon the Labour Court or Industrial Tribunal to answer the terms of reference.

Admittedly the present case is not regarding illegal termination of the workman; rather denial of empanelment

of workman in pursuance to advertisement dated 24.09.1991, and the workman had been kept on pursuing his

matter with the management and it was only after their denial he approached the Conciliation officer for his

legal remedy, therefore, in the light of the facts and circumstances of the present case the objection raised by the

management regarding delay in raising the present industrial dispute is not tenable in the eye of law. Moreover,

the delay could not be used as tool to deprive the workman of his legitimate rights of proper adjudication of the

case on it merits.

12.

With regard to the merits of the case, it is not disputed that the workman had been engaged by the

opposite party bank in two different spells as daily wager i.e. from 17.11.1986 to 13.02.1987 and from

15.03.1988 to 11.06.1988 for 89 – 89 days each; and accordingly, the worked for total 178 days with the Bank

between November, 1986 to June, 1988. There is no iota of evidence on record that the workman worked for

240 days in a year preceding June, 1988, therefore, the present case does not pertain to the violation of the

provisions of section 25 F of the Act.

13.

In nut shell, the management of the Bank come up with a scheme to make a panel of persons, for

appointment in future vacancies, who had worked with the Bank for more than 90 days during period

01.01.1982 and 31.12.1990 vide advertisement dated 24.09.1991; and the workman applied in pursuance

thereof; and the management denied the claim of the workman. Hence, having regard to the facts of the case

and respective claim of the parties, the rival stands of the parties have to be checked within the purview of the

terms of the advertisement dated advertisement dated 24.09.1991, which is as follows:

बजक जनम्नजलज त ितों के अिीन भजव्‍ की ठरजि ों (अस्ट् ा ी/स्ट् ा ी) िेतु ऐसे व्यजि ों के मामलों

ृर जवचार करने िेतु सूची तज ार करना चािता िज जिन्िोंने १.१.१९८२ एवं ३१.१२.१९९० के बीच

भारत मैं इसकी िा ाओं/का ािलओं में चृरासी के प ृ में ९० ा अजिक दिन अस्ट् ा ी प ृ में का ि

दक ा िो

(क) उम्मीिवारों को सातवीं कक्षा उत्तीणि िोना चाजिए दकन्तु आ वीं कक्षा के आगे अध् न निीं

दक ा िोना चाजिए त ा अस्ट् ाई चृरासी के प ृ में ृिली बार का ि करने की तारी को आ ु

१८ वषि ृूणि िोनी चाजिए दकन्तु २६ वषि ृूणि निीं िोनी चाजिए

( ) सूची में नाम िाजमल करना त ा जन ुजि िेना/अििा, िारीठरक जवकलांग, भूतृूवि सजनक

आदि के आरक्षण एवं मिाजनिेिक रोिगार एवं प्रजिक्षण के सम िन के अिीन िोगा

िो उम्मीिवार उि ितें ृूरी करते िैं वे अृना आवेिन ृत्र जवज्ञाृन की तारी के ३० दिनों के

भीतर उृ मिाप्रबंिक (कार्मिक), बैंक ऑफ बड़ौिा, केंरी का ािल , ३, बालचंि िीराचंि मागि,

बजलाडि जृ र, बम्बई को जनम्नजलज त प्राप ृ में भेिें”

Moreover, in the proforma for application, the para which seeks education qualification, it is mentioned

as under:

३. िजक्षक ोग् ता:

(क) ृिली बार अस्ट् ा ी चृरासी में प ृ में का ि िुप करने की तारी को

( ) आवेिन की तारी को

14.

In the instant case in hand it has to be determined that whether the workman was eligible for empanelment or not,

in terms of advertisement. In this connection, the management while denying empanelment to the workman has alleged that

the advertisement required temporary worker whereas the applicant was not in temporary capacity. In this regard from

perusal of the working certificate, filed by the workman, paper No. 3/5 and 3/6, it is evident that the workman was engaged

as daily wager for 89 days during period 17.11.1986 to 13.02.1987 and 15.03.1988 to 11.06.1988 respectively, which can be

well taken in temporary status.

Further, the management has contended that the workman was not class VII pass when he was inducted by the

Bank for first time; but from perusal of the advertisement dated 24.09.1991 there was no specific cut off date provided for

442 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ascertaining the qualification of applicant; resultantly, in absence of any specific date for consideration of eligibility, it could

be taken the date of advertisement and from perusal of the Transfer Certificate submitted by the workman, paper No. 3/9, it

is clear that the workman had attained an age of approximately 18 ½ years and had requisite educational qualification, as the

required educational qualification in the advertisement dated 24.09.1991 was that “उम्मीिवारों को सातवीं कक्षा उत्तीणि िोना

चाजिए दकन्तु आ वीं कक्षा के आगे अध् न निीं दक ा िोना चाजिए ’’ and the workman was class VIII pass. It is evident from

Transfer Certificate, paper No. 3/9, that the workman passed class VIII on 19.05.1990 and there is no evidence

with regard to fact that he had acquired higher education qualification i.e. class IX pass, on the date of his

application i.e. 15.10.1991 in pursuance to the advertisement dated 24.09.1991. Hence, in light of the facts

narrated hereinabove, it could be well inferred that the workman fulfilled all essential conditions required vide

advertisement dated 24.09.1991, as he had worked for more than 90 days during period 01.01.1992 to

31.12.1990 as temporary/daily wager peon; had attained an age more than 18 years on his date of first

engagement with the bank; and possessed requisite educational qualification on the date of advertisement. The

rest of the requirements relied upon by the management were not essential in nature and were only desirable.

Moreover, case of the workman in para 09 of the statement of claim is that the management has given

appointment to other workmen who were junior to the workman in violation to the provisions contained in

section 25G & 25H of the Act. the Section 25G & 25H of the Act reads as under:

25 G.

Procedure for retrenchment. -Were any workman in an industrial establishment, who is a

citizen of India, is to be retrenched and he belongs to a particular category of workmen in that

establishment, in the absence of any agreement between the employer and the workman in this

behalf, the employer shall ordinarily retrench the workman who was the last person to be employed

in that category, unless for reasons to be recorded the employer retrenches any other workman.

25 H. Re-employment of retrenched workmen. – Where any workmen are retrenched, and the

employer proposes to take into his employ any persons, he shall, in such manner as may be

prescribed, give an opportunity to the retrenched workmen who are citizens of India to offer

themselves for re-employment, and such retrenched workmen who offer themselves for re-

employment shall have preference over other persons.”

The contention of the workman vide para 09 of his statement of claim that the management appointed

other juniors, ignoring his candidature, is not specifically denied by the management, which amounts to

violation of Section 25G & 25H of the Act. Also, the case laws relied upon by the management in support of its

case are distinguishable in light of facts of the present case and respective facts of the case laws referred; hence

not applicable in the present case.

15.

Thus, from the facts and circumstances of the case and discussions made hereinabove, I am of the

considered opinion that the action of the management of Bank of Baroda in not appointing the workman with

other sub staff, is unjustified and illegal; and accordingly, the workman is entitled for appointment as sub staff

from the date other juniors were given appointment with all consequential services benefits; however he shall

not be entitled for back wages for delay in raising present industrial dispute, in light of pronouncement of

Hon’ble Apex Court, discussed in preceding para.

16.

The reference under adjudication is answered accordingly.

17.

Award as above.

Let two copies of the award be sent to the Ministry for publication.

LUCKNOW.

11th February, 2021

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 18 Qjojh] 2021

—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

flafMdsV cSad ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] y[kuÅ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 21@2006½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18-02-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-12011@41@2006-vkbZvkj ¼ch-II)]

lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

443

New Delhi, the 18th February, 2021

S.O. 161.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 21/2006) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Syndicate

Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18.02.2021.

[No. L-12011/41/2006-IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL–CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

PRESENT : P. K. SRIVASTAVA, HJS (Retd.)

I.D. No. 21/2006

Ref. No. L-12011/41/2006-IR(B-II) dated: 07.08.2006

BETWEEN :

The General Secretary

Syndicate Bank Employees’ Union

U.P. State Committee, 91, Halwasia Market (3rd Floor)

Hazratganj, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Lucnow – 226001.

(Espousing case of Sri Om Veer Singh)

Vs

The Asstt General Manager

Syndicate Bank

Zonal Office, IR Cell University Road, Bhawanipuram

Meerut (UP) – 250004

AWARD

1.

By order No. L-12011/41/2006-IR(B-II) dated: 07.08.2006 & its subsequent corrigendum dated

21.09.2007, the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour, New Delhi in exercise of powers conferred by

clause (d) of sub section (1) and sub section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

referred this industrial dispute for adjudication.

2.

The reference under adjudication is:

“WHETHER THE ACTION OF THE MANAGEMENT OF SYNDICATE BANK IN IMPOSING

PUNISHMENT VIDE ORDER DATED 27.12.2003 UPON SHRI OM VEER SINGH, CASHIER IS

LEGAL AND JUSTIFIED? IF NOT, WHAT RELIEF THE WORKMAN IS ENTITLED?”

3.

It is It is admitted case of the parties that the workman, Om Veer Singh was working as Clerk at

Mawana Branch, when he was issued a charge sheet dated 17.07.2002 for gross misconduct of indecent

behavior on the premises of the bank and doing act prejudicial to the interest of the bank. Shri Prem Raj was

appointed Inquiry Officer, who submitted his inquiry report dated 23.10.2003. The Disciplinary Authority, on

the basis of findings of the Enquiry Officer, issued show cause, which was replied by the workman; and

thereafter the Disciplinary Authority passed punishment order dated 27.12.2003; which was subsequently

confirmed by the Appellate Authority vide order dated 25.03.2004, rejecting appeal of the workman.

4.

It has been alleged by the workman that the Departmental proceedings which were conducted in

violation to the principles of natural justice is liable to be set aside. Moreover, he has also come up with a case

that the inquiry officer did not examine material witness, which caused prejudice to his case. The workman has

also alleged that the Inquiry Officer did not afford him proper opportunity to defend himself before the inquiry

and also did not summon the material witness before the inquiry, therefore, the inquiry being defective is liable

to be set aside with consequential benefits.

5.

The management of the Bank in its written statement has denied the allegations of the workman and

has submitted that the workman had been involved in misconduct of indecent behavior on the premises of the

bank and doing act prejudicial to the interest of the bank; resultantly, was issued a charge sheet dated

17.07.2002. The management has also submitted that the was afforded all reasonable opportunity to defend

himself, inasmuch as the departmental proceedings were conducted in accordance with the principles of natural

justice and after thorough appreciation of the findings of the inquiry officer, the workman was imposed with the

punishment of reduction of his basic pay by one stage for one year for each of two charges separately, which

444 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

was subsequently confirmed by the Appellate Authority under Rules. The management has submitted that the

punishment order dated 27.12.2003 is well reasoned and speaking; therefore, the same is liable to be up held,

without any relief to the workman concerned.

6.

The workman’s union has filed its rejoinder, reiterating the averments already made in the statement of

claim.

7.

Following preliminary issues were framed vide order dated 01.11.2019:

(i)

Whether the departmental inquiry was conducted as per law.

Moreover, at subsequent stage of the case, two additional issues were also framed vide order dated

23.12.32020 as under:

(ii) Whether the findings of inquiry officer are perverse?

(iii) Whether the punishment imposed is proportionate to the charges or not?

The parties have filed documents in support of their case. The workman did not turn up either to get

cross-examined or to cross-examine the management witness. The workman or his representative was not

turning up for more than a year, therefore, oral submissions of the learned counsel of the management had been

heard at length and documents relied upon by the parties had been perused, keeping in view long pendency of

the case since 2006.

8.

Heard, learned counsel of the management and scanned entire material available on record, including

pleading of the respective parties, evidence relied upon by them.

9.

It had been alleged by the workman that the Departmental proceedings which were conducted in

violation to the principles of natural justice is liable to be set aside. Moreover, he has also come up with a case

that the inquiry officer did not summon material witness, which caused prejudiced to his case. The workman

has also alleged that the Appellate Authority also rejected his appeal in utter violation of provisions of

provisions of the Bipartite Settlement in an illegal manner and has prayed that the action of the management in

imposing the punishment of reduction of basic pay by one stage for one year be declared illegal and unjustified

and the same may be set aside with consequential benefits.

10.

However, in rebuttal the management has come up with a case, that the workman who was charge

sheeted for misconduct of indecent behavior on the premises of the bank and doing act prejudicial to the interest

of the bank; and after conducting a detailed inquiry, wherein the principles of natural justice was observed, the

workman was found guilty for the alleged charges and resultantly, the workman was punished with reduction of

his basic pay by one stage for one year for each of two charges separately.

11.

Having given gone through the pleadings & evidence adduced by the rival parties, thoughtful

consideration to the contentions of the learned counsel of management, the issued framed vide order dated

01.11.2019 and 23.12.2020 are taken up for consideration hereunder:

Issue No. 01:-

12.

As regards first issue regarding fairness of the domestic inquiry, from perusal of the inquiry

proceedings on record, it is evident that the workman had been supplied copy of charge sheet along with

documents relied upon before the inquiry, he was given opportunity to be represented by defence representative;

apart from cross-examining the prosecution witness and adducing his defence. During inquiry the workman was

granted adjournment/time in absence of his defence representative; moreover, he also filed with written

submission before the inquiry. Though the workman has pleaded that there was violation of principles of natural

justice; but failed to substantiate the same through cogent evidence i.e. documentary or oral. On the contrary,

from perusal of the inquiry proceedings, available on record, it is established that the domestic inquiry was fairly

conducted by the management and the workman had been given all reasonable opportunity to defend himself

during the course of the inquiry.

Therefore, in view of the discussions, made hereinabove, it is held that the departmental inquiry,

conducted by the management, was fair and proper. Accordingly, the issue No. 01 is decided in favour of the

management.

Issue No. 02:-

13.

As regards, issue No. 2, it is apparent on the face of record that the workman participated in the

departmental proceedings and had been afforded all reasonable opportunity to defend himself; moreover,

acquittal of the workman in the criminal case has no effect on the ongoing departmental action. Also, the

workman’s union could not prove at any juncture that the findings of the inquiry officer was perverse or

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

445

inconsistent with the evidence collected by him during the course of inquiry. From perusal of the inquiry report

it is evident that the inquiry report was based on oral evidence of MW-1 & MW-2, which remained unrebutted;

moreover, it is apparent on the face of record that the evidence brought before the inquiry officer had been

properly analyzed; and thereafter, the inquiry officer arrived at the conclusion. Thus, inquiry officer on over all

consideration of the entire evidence available on record, submitted his findings before the Disciplinary

Authority with conclusion the charges found proved; hence, I am of the considered opinion that the findings of

the inquiry officer were not perverse and the second issue is also decided in favour of the management.

Issue No. 03:-

14.

Now taking up the third issue, it is well settled that the Labour Court has ample power under section

11-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to substitute a lesser punishment, taking into consideration the facts

and circumstances of the case. Moreover, the principle of proportionality calls for interference of this Court into

the punishment imposed by the management i.e. of removal in view of law in Joseph Solomon vs. Presiding

Officer, Labour Court, U.P., Dehradun & another 2012 (134) FLR 424.

15.

In the instant case the workman was charge sheeted for his alleged misconduct of indecent behavior on

the premises of the bank and doing act prejudicial to the interest of the bank; which has been found proved by

the inquiry officer and accordingly, the workman had been punished with ‘reduction of his basic pay by one

stage for one year for each of two charges separately’.

16.

Hon’ble Apex Court in B.C. Chayurvedi v. Union of India, (1995) 6 SCC 749 while discussing about

the scope of judicial review, in disciplinary matters, has observed as under:

“The High Court/Tribunal, while exercising the power of judicial review, cannot normally substitute

its own conclusion on penalty and impose some other penalty. If the punishment imposed by the

disciplinary authority or the appellate authority shocks the conscience of the High Court/Tribunal, it

would appropriately mould the relief, either directing the disciplinary/appellate authority to

reconsider the penalty imposed, or to shorten the litigation, it may itself, in exceptional and rare

cases, imposed appropriate punishment with cogent reasons in support thereof.”

In DG, RPF vs. Sai Babu (2003) 4 SCC 331, Hon’ble Apex Court has observed that:

“6…………. Normally, the punishment imposed by a disciplinary authority should not be disturbed

by the High Court or a tribunal except in appropriate cases that too only after reaching a conclusion

that the punishment imposed is grossly or shockingly disproportionate, after examining all the

relevant factors including the nature of charges proved against, the past conduct, penalty imposed

earlier, the nature of duties assigned having due regard to their sensitiveness, exactness expected of

an discipline required to be maintained, and the department/establishment which the delinquent

person concerned works.”

In United Commercial Bank vs. P.C. Kakkar (2003) 4 SCC 364 Hon’ble Apex Court on review of a

long line of cases and the principles of judicial review of administrative action under English law summarized

the legal position in the following words:

“11. The common thread running through in all these decisions is that the court should not

interfere with the administrators’ decision unless it was illogical or suffers from procedural

imp0ropriety or was shocking to the conscience of the court, in the sense that it was in

defiance of logic or moral standards. In view of what has been stated in Wednesbury case the

court would not go into the correctness of the choice made by the administrator open to him

and the court should not substitute its decision to that of the administrator. The scope of

judicial review is judicial review is limited to the deficiency in decision-making process and not

the decision.

12.

To put it differently, unless the punishment imposed by the disciplinary authority or the

appellate authority shocks the conscience of the court/tribunal, there is no scope for

interference. Further, to shorten litigation it may, in exceptional and rare cases, impose

appropriate punishment by recording cogent reasons in support thereof.”

In Union of India vs. S.S. Ahluwalia (2007) 7 SCC 257 Hon’ble Supreme Court reiterated the legal

position as follows:

“8.

……… The scope of judicial review in the matter of imposition of penalty as a

result of disciplinary proceedings is very limited. The court can interfere with the

punishment only if it finds the same to be shockingly disproportionate to the charges found

to be proved.”

446 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

In State of Meghalaya v. Mecken Singh N. Marak (2008) 7 SCC 580 Hon’ble Supreme Court stated

that:

“The punishment imposed by the disciplinary authority or the appellate authority unless shocking to

the conscience of the court, cannot be subjected to judicial review.

17.

Hon’ble Apex Court in Administrator, Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli vs. Gulbhia M. Lad

(2010) 2 SCC (L&S) 101 has observed that

“The legal position is fairly well settled that while exercising the power of judicial review, the High

Court or a Tribunal cannot interfere with the discretion exercised by the disciplinary authority,

and/or on appeal the appellate authority with regard to the imposition of punishment unless such

discretion suffers from illegality or material procedural irregularity or that would shock the

conscience of the court/tribunal. The exercise of discretion in imposition of punishment by the

disciplinary authority or appellate authority is dependent on host of factors such as gravity of

misconduct, past conduct, the nature of duties assigned to the delinquent, responsibility of the

position that the delinquent holds, previous penalty, if any, and the discipline required to be

maintained in the department or establishment he works. Ordinarily the court or the tribunal would

not substitute its opinion on reappraisal of facts.

18.

Moreover, the Banks being financial institution; where the hard earned money of the public at large is

kept, and any disorderly atmosphere in the Bank premises may lead to loss to trust of the depositors on the

Banking institution; which may ultimately lead to collapse of financial system of the country and the same is not

permissible at all. Hon’ble Apex Court in (2011) 1 Supreme Court Cases (L&S) 721 has observed that:

“7.

It is now well settled that the courts will not act as an appellate court and reassess the

evidence led in the domestic enquiry, nor interfere on the ground that another view is possible on the

material on record. If the inquiry has been fairly and properly held and the findings are based on

evidence, the question of adequacy of the evidence or the reliable nature of the evidence will not be

grounds for interfering with the findings in departmental enquiries. Therefore, the courts will not

interfere with findings of fact recorded in departmental inquiries, except where such findings are

based on no evidence or where they are clearly perverse. The test to find out perversity is to see

whether a tribunal acting reasonably could have arrived at such conclusion or findings, on the

material on record. The courts will however interfere with the findings in disciplinary matters, if

principles of natural justice or statutory regulations have been violated or if the order is found to be

arbitrary, capricious, mala fide or based on extraneous considerations.”

19.

In the instant case, the workman was punished with the punishment of ‘reduction of his basic pay by

one stage for one year for each of two charges separately’. Hon’ble Bombay High Court in Western Coalfield

Ltd. vs Santosh Kumar and others 2018 LLR 764 has observed that hurling of filthy abusive language at a senior

officer justifies dismissal; whereas in the present case, the workman had been punished with reduction of his

basic pay by one stage for one year for each of two charges separately, on the account of charges being proved.

Therefore, under the facts and the circumstances of the case in hand and considering the laws pronounced by

Hon’ble Supreme Court and Hon’ble High Courts, there is no justification in interfering with the punishment

imposed upon the workman. Accordingly, the workman is not entitled for any relief.

20.

Award as above.

Let two copies of this award be sent to the Ministry for publication.

LUCKNOW.

22nd January, 2021

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 18 Qjojh] 2021

—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

flafMdsV cSad ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] y[kuÅ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 24@2005½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18-02-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-12011@8@2005-vkbZvkj ¼ch-II)]

lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

447

New Delhi, the 18th February, 2021

S.O. 162.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 24/2005) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Syndicate

Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18.02.2021.

[No. L-12011/8/2005-IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL–CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

PRESENT: P. K. SRIVASTAVA, HJS (Retd.)

I.D. No. 24/2005

Ref. No. L-12011/8/2005-IR(B-II) dated: 17.06.2005

BETWEEN :

The Secretary

Syndicate Bank Empls. Union U.P. State Committee

91, Halwasia Market

Lucnow – 226001.

(Espousing case of Sri Pawan Kumar)

Vs

The Asstt General Manager

Syndicate Bank

Zonal Office, IR Cell University Road, Bhawanipuram

Meerut (UP) – 250004

AWARD

1.

By order No. L-12011/8/2005-IR(B-II) dated: 17.06.2005 & its subsequent corrigendum dated

21.08.2006, the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour, New Delhi in exercise of powers conferred by

clause (d) of sub section (1) and sub section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

referred this industrial dispute for adjudication.

2.

The reference under adjudication is:

“WHETHER THE ACTION OF THE MANAGEMENT OF SY. BANK IN IMPOSING THE

PUNISHMENT ON SH. PAWAN KR., CLERK VIDE ORDER DATED 17.9.03 IS LEGAL AND

JUSTIFIED? IF NOT, WHAT RELIEF THE WORKMAN CONCERNED IS ENTITLED TO?”

3.

It is It is admitted case of the parties that the workman, Pawan Kumar was working as Clerk at

Lakhimpur Kheri Branch, when he was issued a charge sheet dated 25.07.2002 for gross misconduct of riotous

& disorderly behavior on the premises of the bank and doing act prejudicial to the interest of the bank.

Shri Prem Raj was appointed Inquiry Officer, who submitted his inquiry report dated 08.03.2003. The

Disciplinary Authority, on the basis of findings of the Enquiry Officer, issued show cause, which was replied by

the workman; and thereafter the Disciplinary Authority passed punishment order dated 17.09.2003; which was

subsequently confirmed by the Appellate Authority vide order dated 29.11.2003, rejecting appeal of the

workman.

4.

It has been alleged by the workman that the Departmental proceedings which were conducted in

violation to the principles of natural justice is liable to be set aside. Moreover, he has also come up with a case

that the inquiry officer held the ex-parte inquiry on 23.12.2002 in spite of information of illness of workman to

him, which caused prejudice to his case. The workman has also alleged that the Inquiry Officer did not afford

him proper opportunity to defend himself before the inquiry, therefore, the inquiry being defective is liable to be

set aside with consequential benefits.

5.

The management of the Bank in its written statement has denied the allegations of the workman and

has submitted that the workman had been involved in misbehaving with the Manager and disorderly behavior in

the bank premises; resultantly, was issued a charge sheet dated 25.07.2002 for gross misconduct of riotous &

disorderly behavior on the premises of the bank and doing act prejudicial to the interest of the bank. The

management has also submitted that the was afforded all reasonable opportunity to defend himself, inasmuch as

the departmental proceedings were conducted in accordance with the principles of natural justice and after

448 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

thorough appreciation of the findings of the inquiry officer, the workman was imposed with the punishment of

reduction of his basic pay by two stages for each of two charges separately, which was subsequently confirmed

by the Appellate Authority under Rules. The management has submitted that the punishment order dated

17.09.2003 is well reasoned and speaking; therefore, the same is liable to be up held, without any relief to the

workman concerned.

6.

The workman’s union has filed its rejoinder, reiterating the averments already made in the statement of

claim.

7.

Following preliminary issues were framed vide order dated 01.11.2019:

(i) Whether the departmental inquiry was conducted as per law.

Moreover, at subsequent stage of the case, two additional issues were also framed vide order dated

23.12.32020 as under:

(ii) Whether the findings of inquiry officer are perverse?

(iii) Whether the punishment imposed is proportionate to the charges or not?

The parties have filed documents in support of their case. The workman’s union examined workman;

whereas the management examined inquiry officer, Shri Prem Raj, in support of their respective pleadings. The

parties availed opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses of each other. The workman or his representative

was not turning up for more than a year, therefore, oral submissions of the learned counsel of the management

had been heard at length and documents relied upon by the parties had been perused, keeping in view long

pendency of the case since 2005.

8.

Heard, learned counsel of the management and scanned entire material available on record, including

pleading of the respective parties, evidence relied upon by them documentary as well oral.

9.

It had been alleged by the workman that the Departmental proceedings which were conducted in

violation to the principles of natural justice is liable to be set aside. Moreover, he has also come up with a case

that the inquiry officer conducted ex-parte inquiry, denying him adjournment on his illness, which caused

prejudiced to his case. The workman has also alleged that the Appellate Authority also rejected his appeal in

utter violation of provisions of provisions of the Bipartite Settlement in an illegal manner and has prayed that

the action of the management in imposing the punishment of reduction of basic pay by two stages be declared

illegal and unjustified and the same may be set aside with consequential benefits.

10.

However, in rebuttal the management has come up with a case, that the workman who was charge

sheeted for riotous & disorderly behavior on the premises of the bank and doing act prejudicial to the interest of

the bank; and after conducting a detailed inquiry, wherein the principles of natural justice was observed, the

workman was found guilty for the alleged charges and resultantly, the workman was punished with reduction of

his basic pay by two stages for each of two charges separately.

11.

Having given gone through the pleadings & evidence adduced by the rival parties, thoughtful

consideration to the contentions of the learned counsel of management, the issued framed vide order dated

01.11.2019 and 23.12.2020 are taken up for consideration hereunder:

Issue No. 01:-

12.

As regards first issue regarding fairness of the domestic inquiry, from perusal of the inquiry

proceedings on record, it is evident that the workman had been supplied copy of charge sheet along with

documents relied upon before the inquiry, he was given opportunity to be represented by defence representative;

apart from cross-examining the prosecution witness and adducing his defence. During inquiry the workman was

granted adjournment/time in absence of his defence representative; moreover, he also filed with written

submission before the inquiry. Though the workman has pleaded that there was violation of principles of

natural justice; but failed to substantiate the same through cogent evidence i.e. documentary or oral. On the

contrary, from perusal of the inquiry proceedings, available on record, it is established that the domestic inquiry

was fairly conducted by the management and the workman had been given all reasonable opportunity to defend

himself during the course of the inquiry.

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

449

Therefore, in view of the discussions, made hereinabove, it is held that the departmental inquiry,

conducted by the management, was fair and proper. Accordingly, the issue No. 01 is decided in favour of the

management.

Issue No. 02:-

13.

As regards, issue No. 2, it is apparent on the face of record that the workman participated in the

departmental proceedings and had been afforded all reasonable opportunity to defend himself; moreover,

acquittal of the workman in the criminal case has no effect on the ongoing departmental action. Also, the

workman’s union could not prove at any juncture that the findings of the inquiry officer was perverse or

inconsistent with the evidence collected by him during the course of inquiry. Moreover, from perusal of the

inquiry report it is evident that all the documents i.e. MEX-02 to MEX-21 were proved by the MW-1; moreover,

it is apparent on the face of record that the evidence brought before the inquiry officer had been properly

analyzed and thereafter, the inquiry officer arrived at the conclusion. Thus, inquiry officer on over all

consideration of the entire evidence available on record, submitted his findings before the Disciplinary

Authority with conclusion the charges found proved; hence, I am of the considered opinion that the findings of

the inquiry officer were not perverse and the second issue is also decided in favour of the management.

Issue No. 03:-

14.

Now taking up the third issue, it is well settled that the Labour Court has ample power under section

11-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to substitute a lesser punishment, taking into consideration the facts

and circumstances of the case. Moreover, the principle of proportionality calls for interference of this Court into

the punishment imposed by the management i.e. of removal in view of law in Joseph Solomon vs. Presiding

Officer, Labour Court, U.P., Dehradun & another 2012 (134) FLR 424.

15.

In the instant case the workman was charge sheeted for his alleged riotous & disorderly behavior on the

premises of the bank and doing act prejudicial to the interest of the bank; which has been found proved by the

inquiry officer and accordingly, the workman had been punished with ‘reduction of his basic pay by two stages

for each of two charges separately’.

16.

Hon’ble Apex Court in B.C. Chayurvedi v. Union of India, (1995) 6 SCC 749 while discussing about

the scope of judicial review, in disciplinary matters, has observed as under:

“The High Court/Tribunal, while exercising the power of judicial review, cannot normally substitute

its own conclusion on penalty and impose some other penalty. If the punishment imposed by the

disciplinary authority or the appellate authority shocks the conscience of the High Court/Tribunal, it

would appropriately mould the relief, either directing the disciplinary/appellate authority to

reconsider the penalty imposed, or to shorten the litigation, it may itself, in exceptional and rare

cases, imposed appropriate punishment with cogent reasons in support thereof.”

In DG, RPF vs. Sai Babu (2003) 4 SCC 331, Hon’ble Apex Court has observed that:

“6…………. Normally, the punishment imposed by a disciplinary authority should not be disturbed

by the High Court or a tribunal except in appropriate cases that too only after reaching a conclusion

that the punishment imposed is grossly or shockingly disproportionate, after examining all the

relevant factors including the nature of charges proved against, the past conduct, penalty imposed

earlier, the nature of duties assigned having due regard to their sensitiveness, exactness expected of

an discipline required to be maintained, and the department/establishment which the delinquent

person concerned works.”

In United Commercial Bank vs. P.C. Kakkar (2003) 4 SCC 364 Hon’ble Apex Court on review of a

long line of cases and the principles of judicial review of administrative action under English law summarized

the legal position in the following words:

“11. The common thread running through in all these decisions is that the court should not

interfere with the administrators’ decision unless it was illogical or suffers from procedural

imp0ropriety or was shocking to the conscience of the court, in the sense that it was in

defiance of logic or moral standards. In view of what has been stated in Wednesbury case the

court would not go into the correctness of the choice made by the administrator open to him

and the court should not substitute its decision to that of the administrator. The scope of

judicial review is judicial review is limited to the deficiency in decision-making process and not

the decision.

450 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

12.

To put it differently, unless the punishment imposed by the disciplinary authority or the

appellate authority shocks the conscience of the court/tribunal, there is no scope for

interference. Further, to shorten litigation it may, in exceptional and rare cases, impose

appropriate punishment by recording cogent reasons in support thereof.”

In Union of India vs. S.S. Ahluwalia (2007) 7 SCC 257 Hon’ble Supreme Court reiterated the legal

position as follows:

“8.

……… The scope of judicial review in the matter of imposition of penalty as a

result of disciplinary proceedings is very limited. The court can interfere with the

punishment only if it finds the same to be shockingly disproportionate to the charges found

to be proved.”

In State of Meghalaya v. Mecken Singh N. Marak (2008) 7 SCC 580 Hon’ble Supreme Court stated

that:

“The punishment imposed by the disciplinary authority or the appellate authority unless shocking to

the conscience of the court, cannot be subjected to judicial review.

17.

Hon’ble Apex Court in Administrator, Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli vs. Gulbhia M. Lad

(2010) 2 SCC (L&S) 101 has observed that

“The legal position is fairly well settled that while exercising the power of judicial review, the High

Court or a Tribunal cannot interfere with the discretion exercised by the disciplinary authority,

and/or on appeal the appellate authority with regard to the imposition of punishment unless such

discretion suffers from illegality or material procedural irregularity or that would shock the

conscience of the court/tribunal. The exercise of discretion in imposition of punishment by the

disciplinary authority or appellate authority is dependent on host of factors such as gravity of

misconduct, past conduct, the nature of duties assigned to the delinquent, responsibility of the

position that the delinquent holds, previous penalty, if any, and the discipline required to be

maintained in the department or establishment he works. Ordinarily the court or the tribunal would

not substitute its opinion on reappraisal of facts.

18.

Moreover, the Banks being financial institution; where the hard earned money of the public at large is

kept, and any disorderly atmosphere in the Bank premises may lead to loss to trust of the depositors on the

Banking institution; which may ultimately lead to collapse of financial system of the country and the same is not

permissible at all. Hon’ble Apex Court in (2011) 1 Supreme Court Cases (L&S) 721 has observed that:

“7.

It is now well settled that the courts will not act as an appellate court and reassess the

evidence led in the domestic enquiry, nor interfere on the ground that another view is possible on the

material on record. If the inquiry has been fairly and properly held and the findings are based on

evidence, the question of adequacy of the evidence or the reliable nature of the evidence will not be

grounds for interfering with the findings in departmental enquiries. Therefore, the courts will not

interfere with findings of fact recorded in departmental inquiries, except where such findings are

based on no evidence or where they are clearly perverse. The test to find out perversity is to see

whether a tribunal acting reasonably could have arrived at such conclusion or findings, on the

material on record. The courts will however interfere with the findings in disciplinary matters, if

principles of natural justice or statutory regulations have been violated or if the order is found to be

arbitrary, capricious, mala fide or based on extraneous considerations.”

19.

In the instant case, the workman was punished with the punishment of ‘reduction of his basic pay by

two stages for each of two charges separately’. Hon’ble Bombay High Court in Western Coalfield Ltd. vs

Santosh Kumar and others 2018 LLR 764 has observed that hurling of filthy abusive language at a senior officer

justifies dismissal; whereas in the present case, the workman had been punished with reduction of his basic pay

by two stages for each of two charges separately, on the account of charges being proved. Therefore, under the

facts and the circumstances of the case in hand and considering the laws pronounced by Hon’ble Supreme Court

and Hon’ble High Courts, there is no justification in interfering with the punishment imposed upon the

workman. Accordingly, the workman is not entitled for any relief.

20.

Award as above.

Let two copies of this award be sent to the Ministry for publication.

LUCKNOW

22nd January, 2021.

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

451

ubZ fnYyh] 22 Qjojh] 2021

—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj mÙkj jsyos izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdkas vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k] y[kuÅ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 02@2004½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 22-02-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-41012@88@2007-vkbZvkj ¼ch-1)]

Mh- xqgk] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 22nd February, 2021

S.O. 163.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 02/2004) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Northern

Railway and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 22.02.2021.

[No. L-41012/88/2007-IR(B-1)]

D. GUHA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL–CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

PRESENT: P. K. SRIVASTAVA, HJS (Retd.)

I.D. No. 02/2004

Ref. No. L-41012/88/2007-IR(B-I) dated: 08.10.2007

BETWEEN

Mandal Sanghatan Mantri

Uttar Railway Karmachari Union

283/63 KH (B), Ghari Kanora, Prewati Nagar

Post: Manak Nagar

Lucknow – 6

(Espousing cause of Shri Shiv Kumar)

AND

Senior Personnel Officer

Northern Railway

Loco Shop, Chaar Bagh

Lucknow.

AWARD

1.

By order No. L-41012/88/2007-IR(B-I) dated: 08.10.2007, the Central Government in the Ministry of

Labour, New Delhi in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub section (1) and sub section (2A) of

Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) referred this industrial dispute for adjudication; and

the same has been adjudicated by this Tribunal vide award dated 03.07.2014 and its subsequent corrigendum

dated 24.09.2015; however, the award was recalled on request of the management.

2.

The reference under adjudication is:

“WHETHER THE ACTION OF THE MANAGEMENT OF NORTHERN RAILWAY, LUCKNOW

OVER NON PAYMENT OF PCO ALLOWANCES TO SHRI SHIV KUMAR, TKT. NO. IS-08

FROM 25/06/1998 TO 17/04/2001 LIKE OTHER WORKMEN, IS JUSTIFIED? IF NOT, TO

WHAT RELIEF THE WORKMAN CONCERNED IS ENTITLED?”

3.

The case of the workman’s union, in brief, is that the workman, Shiv Kumar, was appointed as skilled

fitter on 05.07.77. It is alleged that the workman was made to join in the inspection shop on the basis of

suitability vide office order dated 23.10.97 without PCO allowance w.e.f. 25.06.98; whereas the other

employees were given PCO allowance from the date of resumption of the charge. It is stated that the

management has granted him PCO allowance, on making various representations, w.e.f. 18.04.2001.

Accordingly, the workman’s union has prayed that the workman be granted PCO allowance from 25.06.98 to

17.04.2001.

452 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4.

The management has disputed the claim of the workman’s union and filed its written statement;

wherein it has stated that the workman was appointed as skilled fitter on the sanctioned post of Speedometer in

the Cadre of year 1991-92 without PCO allowance and was posted in Diesel Shop and at the time of his posting

in Diesel Shop, the Cadre of year 1996-97 was zero. It is submitted that a policy settlement was regarding PCO

allowance; wherein it was decided that on the basis of Cadre of year 1991-92, the suitability test of the working

employees be done and according to the Cadre of year 1996-97, they may be appointed in Inspection Shop and

paid PCO allowance. Rest employees shall remain posted on their place of posting without PCO allowance and

they will be promoted in the Shop floor. The workman after screening was posted in inspection shop without

PCO allowance. It is submitted that at the time of his posting in PCO, it was decided in consultation with both

the recognized unions that staff in PCO would be made on the basis of Cadre strength of 91-92 but PCO

allowance would be applicable on the basis of Cadre strength sanctioned in the year 1996-97 and in Cadre of 96-

97 there was no sanctioned posts of Fitter Electrical Grade I as PCO allowance; accordingly, PCO allowance

could not be granted to the workman for the want of post but in other cases there was sanctioned post even in

the Cadre of 96-97 as such they were sanctioned PCO allowance. Therefore, the management has prayed that

the claim of the workman’s union be rejected being devoid of merit.

6.

The workman’s union has filed its rejoinder whereby it has stated nothing new apart from reiterating

his averments already made in the statement of claim.

7.

The workman’s union has filed photo copy of documents in support of its claim; whereas the

management has filed none. The workman has examined himself whereas the management has not forwarded

any evidence, in spite of ample opportunities being forward to it, which led to presumption that the management

is not interested to lead evidence hence its opportunity to lead evidence was closed and the case was fixed for

arguments. The management again did not turn for arguments and the authorized representative argued his case;

resultantly, the reference was answered in the favour of workman vide award dated 03.07.2014; and on being

notified by the Central Government, the copy of award was forwarded to the parties. Thereafter, the

management moved an application to recall the award dated 03.07.20014; and after hearing the parties the

award dated 03.07.2014 was recalled and present industrial dispute was restored on its original number vide

order dated 20.12.2017 in Misc. Case No. 04/2015 and the management was given an opportunity to lead

evidence in support its case.

8.

The management filed its evidence and 21.05.2018 was fixed for cross-examination of its witness; but

the management failed to get its witness cross-examined; resulting into list of case ex-parte argument by the

workman. The workman argued its case and file was reserved for award, being the case pertaining to the year

2007.

9.

Heard representatives of the workman’s union only and perused entire evidence on record and gone

through respective pleadings of the parties.

10.

The workman’s union has contended that the management of railways deprived the workman of PCO

allowance for which he was entitled as the other employees were getting. The management has pleaded that the

PCO allowance was admissible on the basis of Cadre strength of 96-97 and since there was no post in 96-97,

therefore the workman was not allowed PCO allowance on his joining on the post.

11.

The workman union’s case is that the workman is entitled for PCO allowance since his joining in the

inspection shop at par with other similarly situated employees. The management has controverted the case with

pleading that the PCO allowance was admissible on the basis of Cadre strength in Diesel Shop in 1996-97,

which was zero. Also, in view of the settlement arrived at between the management and recognized unions,

those who clear the suitability test according to Cadre of year 1996-97, may be appointed in inspection shop

with PCO allowance. Also it was decided that the staff in PCO would be made on the basis of Cadre strength of

91-92 but PCO allowance would be applicable on the basis of Cadre strength sanctioned in the year 1996-97.

Since, in the Cadre of 1996-97 there was no sanctioned post of Fitter Electrical Grade-I, as such the workman

was not allowed PCO allowance for the want of post in the Cadre of 96-97. However, the other employees were

given PCO allowance as their cases were covered under existing policy and availability of post. The workman

was granted PCO allowance w.e.f. 18.04.2001 as a result of decision arrived at, in the meeting with the

recognized unions and railway administration.

12.

The workman in his cross-examination has admitted that he is of 96-97 batch. He could not recall

name of any employee who were receiving PCO allowance. The management of the railways did not produce

its witness for cross-examination in spite of number of dates were given to them; hence the evidence filed by

them cannot be taken into account.

13.

The management has disputed the claim of the workman’s union with pleading that the PCO allowance

was admissible on the basis of Cadre strength of 96-97 and since there was no post in 96-97, therefore, the

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

453

workman was not granted PCO allowance; but the management did not prove its pleadings through evidence.

On the contrary the workman has proved its pleadings by the way of evidence and he was duly cross-examined

by the authorized representative of the management. Hon’ble Apex Court in State of U.P. vs. Sheo Shanker Lal

Srivastava & others (2006) 3 SCC 276 the statement of the witness, having not been controverted would be

deemed to be admitted.

14.

Hence, in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and law cited hereinabove, I am of the

considered opinion that the action of the management of Northern Railway in non-payment of PCO allowance

to the workman for the period 25.06.1998 to 17.04.2001 was not justified. Accordingly, the workman

concerned is entitled for payment of PCO allowance for the period 25.06.1998 to 17.04.2001.

15.

The reference under adjudication is answered accordingly.

16.

Award as above.

Let two copies of this award be sent to the Ministry for publication.

LUCKNOW.

11th February, 2021

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 22 Qjojh] 2021

—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj mÙkj jsyos izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdkas vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k] y[kuÅ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 176@2001½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh;

ljdkj dks 22-02-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-41012@123@2001-vkbZvkj ¼ch-1)]

Mh- xqgk] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 22nd February, 2021

S.O. 164.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 176/2001) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Northern

Railway and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 22.02.2021.

[No. L-41012/123/2001-IR(B-1)]

D. GUHA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL–CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

PRESENT : P. K. SRIVASTAVA, HJS (Retd.)

I.D. No. 176/2001

Ref. No. L-41012/123/2001-IR(B-I) dated 26.11.2001

BETWEEN :

Shri Syed Aley Ahmed S/o Tajamul Hussain

H. No. 84/65, Nai Sarak

Nr. Kareem Chakki, Kanpur (UP) – 208001

Vs.

The Divl. Railway Manager, ADJ

Northern Railway, Allahabad (UP) – 211006

AWARD

1.

By order No. L-41012/123/2001-IR(B-I) dated 26.11.2001 the Central Government in the Ministry of

Labour, New Delhi in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub section (1) and sub section (2A) of

Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) referred this industrial dispute between Shri Syed

Aley Ahmed S/o Tajamul Hussain, H. No. 84/65, Nai Sarak, Nr. Kareem Chakki, Kanpur (UP) and the Divl.

Railway Manager, ADJ, Northern Railway, Allahabad (UP) for adjudication.

454 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1.

The reference under adjudication is:

“WHETHER THE ACTION OF THE MANAGEMENT OF NORTHERN RAILWAY,

ALLAHABAD IN IMPOSING THE PENALTY OF COMPULSORY RETIREMENT OF SHRI

S.A. AHMED, EX-ELECTRIC SHUNTER (LOCO) W.E.F. 24.1.1996 IS JUSTIFIED? IF NOT,

WHAT RELIEF THE APPLICANT IS ENTITLED?”

2.

It is admitted case of the parties that the workman, S.A. Ahmed, was working as Electric Shunter in

Northern Railway and was posted in Lucknow when issued a major penalty charge sheet dated 16.02.1995,

inviting his defence reply; and accordingly, the workman made his representation dated 29.03.1995. Shri A.H.

Khan, SLI, Kanpur was appointed as Enquiry Officer, who submitted his enquiry report dated 20.11.1995 before

the disciplinary authority, who furnished a copy of the same to the charge sheeted employee for representation;

accordingly, the charged official represented vide dated 28.11.1995. The Disciplinary Authority punished the

workman with punishment of removal from service vide order dated 24.01.1996; however, on appeal the same

was reduced to compulsory retirement from services w.e.f. 24.01.1996 vide appellate order dated 23.10.1996.

3.

It has been alleged by the workman that he had been punished, contrary to the evidence on record. It

has also been alleged by the workman that his representation against the findings of the Inquiry Officer was not

considered by the Disciplinary Authority while passing impugned order and the reasons given by the

Disciplinary Authority and Appellate Authority are based on flimsy grounds. Accordingly, the workman has

prayed that the Departmental proceedings which were conducted in violation to the principles of natural justice

is liable to be set aside and impugned order, punishing him with compulsory retirement be quashed.

4.

The management of the Railway in its written statement has denied the allegations of the workman and

has defended its domestic proceedings with submission that the workman had been afforded all opportunity

given under rules the principles of natural justice were fully complied with; hence, there is no anomaly with it;

and accordingly, has prayed that domestic enquiry proceedings conducted by it may be upheld and the action of

the Railway vide order dated 23.10.1996 be declared just, fair and legal without any benefit to the workman

concerned.

5.

The workman has filed rejoinder reiterating the averments already made in the statement of claim.

6.

The parties filed documents in support of their respective case. Following preliminary issues were

framed in the presence of the parties vide order dated 27.11.2002:

1. क् ा श्रजमक के जवरुद्ध जवभागी िााँच त्रुठटृूणि िज अ वा निीं?

2. क् ा िााँच अजिकारी की आ्‍ ा िुराग्रिृूणि (perverse) िज?

After framing of preliminary issues, the parties the parties were called upon to adduce their evidence on

preliminary issues. The parties adduced documentary and oral evidence in support of their case and after

hearing the parties, following orders were passed, on preliminary issues, vide order dated 30.06.2015:

“After having heard both the parties at length and perusal of the record, it is inferred that the

departmental enquiry does not suffer from any illegality, and it is neither perverse as well.

Principles of natural justice and all the relevant rules have been followed by the concerned enquiry

authority.

Therefore, preliminary issues dated 27.11.2002 are decided in favour of the management

accordingly. Fix 30.07.2015 for arguments on quantum of punishment”

7.

After deciding preliminary issues the case was listed for arguments on quantum of punishment; and

when the workman or his authorizes representative did not turn up for oral submissions, the argument of the

management was heard on the point of quantum of punishment under Section 11 A of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947. Also, the parties were afforded opportunity to file their written submission.

8.

Heard, authorized representative of the management and perused entire material available on record.

9.

It is well settled that the Labour Court has ample power under section 11-A of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 to substitute a lesser punishment, taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case.

Moreover, the principle of proportionality calls for interference of this Court into the punishment imposed by

the management i.e. of removal in view of law in Joseph Solomon vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, U.P.,

Dehradun & another 2012 (134) FLR 424.

10.

In the instant case the workman was charge sheeted for misconduct of gross negligence in observing

safety rules, which caused accident; whereby a passenger train collided with another engine. The charges were

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

455

found proved and was awarded punishment of removal from services; however, on appeal, the Appellate

Authority, taking a lenient view had reduced the punishment of removal from service, imposed by the

Disciplinary Authority, to compulsory retirement with full retirement benefits under age limit. However, the

workman union has pleaded before this Tribunal that the punishment order is illegal being based on no

evidence.

11.

Hon’ble Apex Court in B.C. Chayurvedi v. Union of India, (1995) 6 SCC 749 while discussing about

the scope of judicial review, in disciplinary matters, has observed as under:

“The High Court/Tribunal, while exercising the power of judicial review, cannot normally substitute

its own conclusion on penalty and impose some other penalty. If the punishment imposed by the

disciplinary authority or the appellate authority shocks the conscience of the High Court/Tribunal, it

would appropriately mould the relief, either directing the disciplinary/appellate authority to

reconsider the penalty imposed, or to shorten the litigation, it may itself, in exceptional and rare

cases, imposed appropriate punishment with cogent reasons in support thereof.”

In DG, RPF vs. Sai Babu (2003) 4 SCC 331, Hon’ble Apex Court has observed that:

“6…………. Normally, the punishment imposed by a disciplinary authority should not be disturbed

by the High Court or a tribunal except in appropriate cases that too only after reaching a conclusion

that the punishment imposed is grossly or shockingly disproportionate, after examining all the

relevant factors including the nature of charges proved against, the past conduct, penalty imposed

earlier, the nature of duties assigned having due regard to their sensitiveness, exactness expected of

an discipline required to be maintained, and the department/establishment which the delinquent

person concerned works.”

In United Commercial Bank vs. P.C. Kakkar (2003) 4 SCC 364 Hon’ble Apex Court on review of a

long line of cases and the principles of judicial review of administrative action under English law summarized

the legal position in the following words:

“11. The common thread running through in all these decisions is that the court should not

interfere with the administrators’ decision unless it was illogical or suffers from procedural

imporopriety or was shocking to the conscience of the court, in the sense that it was in

defiance of logic or moral standards. In view of what has been stated in Wednesbury case the

court would not go into the correctness of the choice made by the administrator open to him

and the court should not substitute its decision to that of the administrator. The scope of

judicial review is judicial review is limited to the deficiency in decision-making process and not

the decision.

12.

To put it differently, unless the punishment imposed by the disciplinary authority or the

appellate authority shocks the conscience of the court/tribunal, there is no scope for

interference. Further, to shorten litigation it may, in exceptional and rare cases, impose

appropriate punishment by recording cogent reasons in support thereof.”

In Union of India vs. S.S. Ahluwalia (2007) 7 SCC 257 Hon’ble Supreme Court reiterated the legal

position as follows:

“8.

……… The scope of judicial review in the matter of imposition of penalty as a result of

disciplinary proceedings is very limited. The court can interfere with the punishment only if it finds

the same to be shockingly disproportionate to the charges found to be proved.”

In State of Meghalaya v. Mecken Singh N. Marak (2008) 7 SCC 580 Hon’ble Supreme Court stated

that:

“The punishment imposed by the disciplinary authority or the appellate authority unless shocking to

the conscience of the court, cannot be subjected to judicial review.

12.

Hon’ble Apex Court in Administrator, Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli vs. Gulbhia M. Lad

(2010) 2 SCC (L&S) 101 has observed that

“The legal position is fairly well settled that while exercising the power of judicial review, the High

Court or a Tribunal cannot interfere with the discretion exercised by the disciplinary authority,

and/or on appeal the appellate authority with regard to the imposition of punishment unless such

discretion suffers from illegality or material procedural irregularity or that would shock the

conscience of the court/tribunal. The exercise of discretion in imposition of punishment by the

disciplinary authority or appellate authority is dependent on host of factors such as gravity of

456 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

misconduct, past conduct, the nature of duties assigned to the delinquent, responsibility of the

position that the delinquent holds, previous penalty, if any, and the discipline required to be

maintained in the department or establishment he works. Ordinarily the court or the tribunal would

not substitute its opinion on reappraisal of facts.

13.

The workman who was punished with the punishment of removal from service by the Disciplinary

Authority for proved misconduct of violation of safety rules, had been compulsory retired with full retirement

benefits under age limit, by the Appellate Authority, on appeal, taking a lenient view. Moreover, the railways

being a public transport system has to work with utmost devotion to its passengers and safety of passengers and

their property is supreme; and any deviation from safety rules or safety measures shall amount not only lack in

service to the passengers; but also shall put the life of passengers their property as well as public property at

high risk; which is not permissible at all. Any lack in safety not only causes unwarranted accidents; but also

invites loss of public faith in the services of Railways. Hon’ble Apex Court in (2011) 1 Supreme Court Cases

(L&S) 721 has observed that:

“7.

It is now well settled that the courts will not act as an appellate court and reassess the

evidence led in the domestic enquiry, nor interfere on the ground that another view is possible on the

material on record. If the inquiry has been fairly and properly held and the findings are based on

evidence, the question of adequacy of the evidence or the reliable nature of the evidence will not be

grounds for interfering with the findings in departmental enquiries. Therefore the courts will not

interfere with findings of fact recorded in departmental inquiries, except where such findings are

based on no evidence or where they are clearly perverse. The test to find out perversity is to see

whether a tribunal acting reasonably could have arrived at such conclusion or findings, on the

material on record. The courts will however interfere with the findings in disciplinary matters, if

principles of natural justice or statutory regulations have been violated or if the order is found to be

arbitrary, capricious, mala fide or based on extraneous considerations.”

14.

In the instant case, the charge of violation of safety rules had been found to be proved; and Appellant

Authority rationally reduced the punishment of removal from service to compulsory retirement with full

retirement benefits under age limit; moreover, this Tribunal has upheld the domestic inquiry conducted by the

Railways and found no infirmity with the findings of the Inquiry Officer, therefore, under the facts and the

circumstances case and considering the laws pronounced by Hon’ble Supreme Court and Hon’ble High Courts,

there is no justification in interfering with the punishment imposed upon the workman by the Appellate

Authority for proved gross misconduct of ‘violation of safety rules’, invoking power u/s 11-A of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947. Accordingly, the workman is not entitled for any relief.

15.

The reference under adjudication is answered accordingly.

16.

Award as above.

Let two copies of this award be sent to the Ministry for publication.

LUCKNOW

22nd January, 2021

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 24 Qjojh] 2021

—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k vgenkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 170@2019½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS]

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 24-02-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-12011@56@2019-vkbZvkj ¼ch-1)]

Mh- xqgk] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 24th February, 2021

S.O. 165.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 170/2019) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank

of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 24.02.2021.

[No. L-12011/56/2019-IR(B-1)]

D. GUHA, Under Secy.

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

457

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Radha Mohan Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer

Dated 11th February, 2021

Reference (CGITA) No. - 170/2019

1.

The Chief General Manager,

State Bank of India, Local Head Office, 8th Floor, Lal Darwaja,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

2.

The Proprietor,

M/s. Hardik Construction,

M-177/2114, Surya Apartment, Opp. Medical Complex,

Sola Road, Naranpura,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) - 380054

…First Parties

V/s

The National General Secretary,

Akhil Bhartiya Safai Mazdoor Sangh,

F-1/F-10, Zavernagar Soceity, Harni Varsia Road,

Vadodara (Gujarat) – 390022

…Second Party

Present: None on behalf of Claimant(s)

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India have in exercise of powers conferred by the

Clause (d) of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2A of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the below

mentioned dispute vide reference adjudication Order No. L-12011/56/2019-IR (B-I) dated 16.12.2019 for adjudication to this

Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the dispute raised by Akhil Safai Mazdoor Sangh, Vadodara against the management of State Bank of

India, LHO, Ahmedabad and their contractor, M/s. Hardik Constructions, Ahmedabad over alleged illegal

termination of services of Shri Shailesh Babubhai Vaghela, Part time sweeper and demand for reinstatement in

services with back wages w.e.f. 25.07.2018 is legal, just and proper? If so, to what relief the concerned workman,

Shri Shailesh Babubhai Vaghela, Part time sweeper is entitled to and from which date and what other direction are

necessary in the matter?”

1.

The same reference was received in this Tribunal on 16th December 2019. The Ministry had directed the party

raising the dispute to file his statement of claim complete with relevant documents with the Tribunal within 15 days of

receipt of this order of reference as per provision made under Rule 10 (B) of Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. This

order of reference had been sent to all the parties as well as this Tribunal through registered post by the Ministry. Therefore,

it is inferred that the same had been delivered to all the parties including claimants. A period of more than a year has been

elapsed but none has appeared and filed the statement of claim as directed and expected by the Ministry. It is worthwhile

mentioning that this reference is prior to spread of COVID-19 pandemic and adversities of lockdown.

2.

In considered opinion of this Tribunal, it is established that either the claimant of this dispute is not interested to

prosecute his claim or the said dispute is no more in existence.

3.

It is therefore just & proper to pass an award considering “no dispute” between the parties.

4.

The award is passed as above. The award be sent for publication U/s 17(1) of Industrial Disputes Act.

RADHA MOHAN CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 24 Qjojh] 2021

—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj if'pe jsyos izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k vgenkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 136@2019½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 24-02-2021 izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-41011@35@2019-vkbZvkj ¼ch-1)]

Mh- xqgk] voj lfpo

458 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 24th February, 2021

S.O. 166.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 136/2019) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Western

Railway and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 24.02.2021.

[No. L-41011/35/2019-IR(B-1)]

D. GUHA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Radha Mohan Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer

Dated 11th February, 2021

Reference: (CGITA) No. 136/2019

1.

The General Manager,

Western Railway, Churchgate,

MUMBAI-400020.

2.

The Chief Works Manager,

Western Railway, Engineering Workshop,

D Cabin, Sabarmati,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)-380019.

3.

The Sr. Divisional Electrical Engineer,

Western Railway, Divisional Office,

Asarwa, Nr. Chamunda Bridge,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)-382345.

…First Parties

V/s

The Jt. Secretary,

Indian Railway Labour Federation,

28-B, Narayan Park, B/h. Chandkheda Railway Station,

Sabarmati, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)-380005.

…Second Party

Present: None on behalf of Claimant(s)

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India have in exercise of powers conferred

by the Clause (d) of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2A of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred

the below mentioned dispute vide reference adjudication Order No. L-41011/35/2019-IR(B-I) dated 30.10.2019

for adjudication to this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of Railway Administration to change disciplinary authority for Electrical Staff

under General Manager’s Circular dated 11.2.2016 is legal, fair & justified? If yes, then what relief the

union/ Electrical Staff is entitled to and what other directions, if any, are necessary in this matter?”

1.

The same reference was received in this Tribunal on 4th November 2019. The Ministry had directed the

party raising the dispute to file their statement of claim complete with relevant documents with the Tribunal

within 15 days of receipt of this order of reference as per provision made under Rule 10 (B) of Industrial

Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. This order of reference had been sent to all the parties as well as this Tribunal

through registered post by the Ministry. Therefore, it is inferred that the same had been delivered to all the

parties including claimants. A period of more than a year has been elapsed but none has appeared and filed the

statement of claim as directed and expected by the Ministry. It is worthwhile mentioning that this reference is

prior to spread of COVID-19 pandemic and adversities of lockdown.

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

459

2.

In considered opinion of this Tribunal, it is established that either the claimant of this dispute is not

interested to prosecute his claim or the said dispute is no more in existence.

3.

It is therefore just & proper to pass an award considering “no dispute” between the parties.

4.

The award is passed as above. The award be sent for publication U/s 17(1) of Industrial Disputes Act.

RADHA MOHAN CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 24 Qjojh] 2021

—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj if'pe jsyos izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k vgenkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 130@2019½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 24-02-2021 izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-41011@31@2019-vkbZvkj ¼ch-1)]

Mh- xqgk] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 24th February, 2021

S.O. 167.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 130/2019) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Western

Railway and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 24.02.2021.

[No. L-41011/31/2019-IR(B-1)]

D. GUHA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Radha Mohan Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer

Dated 11th February, 2021

Reference: (CGITA) No. 130/2019

1)

The General Manager,

Western Railway, Churchgate, Head Quarter,

MUMBAI-400020.

2)

The Divisional Railway Manager,

Western Railway, Pratapnagar,

Vadodara(Gujarat)-390004.

3)

The Divisional Railway Manager,

Western Railway, Asarwa,

Ahmedabad(Gujarat)-380016.

…First Parties

V/s

The Secretary,

Indian Railway Labour Federation,

28-B, Narayan Park,

B/h. Chandkheda Railway Station, Sabarmati,

Ahmedabad

…Second Party

Present: None on behalf of Claimant(s)

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India have in exercise of powers conferred by the

Clause (d) of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2A of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the

below mentioned dispute vide reference adjudication Order No.L-41011/31/2019-IR(B-I) dated 09.10.2019 for

adjudication to this Tribunal.

460 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of Railway Administration not considering the request of Shri Harun Abrahim, Pipe

Filter to alter the date of Birth from 25.01.1957 to 10.10.1962 on the basis of Railway Board Circular dated

19.11.1990 is legal, fair and justified? If Not, what relief Shri Harun Abrahim is entitled to and what other

directions are necessary in the matter?”

1.

The same reference was received in this Tribunal on 14th October 2019. The Ministry had directed the

party raising the dispute to file his statement of claim complete with relevant documents with the Tribunal

within 15 days of receipt of this order of reference as per provision made under Rule 10 (B) of Industrial

Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. This order of reference had been sent to all the parties as well as this Tribunal

through registered post by the Ministry. Therefore, it is inferred that the same had been delivered to all the

parties including claimants. A period of more than a year has been elapsed but none has appeared and filed the

statement of claim as directed and expected by the Ministry. It is worthwhile mentioning that this reference is

prior to spread of COVID-19 pandemic and adversities of lockdown.

2.

In considered opinion of this Tribunal, it is established that either the claimant of this dispute is not

interested to prosecute his claim or the said dispute is no more in existence.

3.

It is therefore just & proper to pass an award considering “no dispute” between the parties.

4.

The award is passed as above. The award be sent for publication U/s 17(1) of Industrial Disputes Act.

RADHA MOHAN CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 24 Qjojh] 2021

—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj if'pe jsyos izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k vgenkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 137@2019½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 24-02-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-41011@32@2019-vkbZvkj ¼ch-1)]

Mh- xqgk] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 24th February, 2021

S.O. 168.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 137/2019) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Western

Railway and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 24.02.2021.

[No. L-41011/32/2019-IR(B-1)]

D. GUHA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Radha Mohan Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer

Dated 11th February, 2021

Reference: (CGITA) No. 137/2019

1)

The Chief Project Manager,

Western Railway, Station Building,

2nd Floor, Kalupur,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat)-380001.

2)

The Chief Works Manager,

Western Railway, Kota Factory,

Kota, Rajasthan-324005.

…First Parties

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

461

V/s

The Jt. Secretary,

Indian Railway Labour Federation,

28-B, Narayan Park, B/h. Chandkheda Railway Station,

Sabarmati, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)-380005.

…Second Party

Present: None on behalf of Claimant(s)

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India have in exercise of powers conferred

by the Clause (d) of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2A of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred

the below mentioned dispute vide reference adjudication Order No. L-41011/32/2019-IR(B-I) dated 21.10.2019

for adjudication to this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of Union to grant ACP/MACP to Shri Kishan Chandra Pandey against the Chief

Project Manager, Western Railway, Ahmedabad and the Chief Works Manager, Rail Wagon Repair

shop, Western Railway, Kota (Rajasthan) is legal, fair and justified? If yeas, what relief, Shri Kishan

Chandra Pandey is entitled to and what other directions are necessary in the matter?”

1.

The same reference was received in this Tribunal on 4th November 2019. The Ministry had directed the

party raising the dispute to file their statement of claim complete with relevant documents with the Tribunal

within 15 days of receipt of this order of reference as per provision made under Rule 10 (B) of Industrial

Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. This order of reference had been sent to all the parties as well as this Tribunal

through registered post by the Ministry. Therefore, it is inferred that the same had been delivered to all the

parties including claimants. A period of more than a year has been elapsed but none has appeared and filed the

statement of claim as directed and expected by the Ministry. It is worthwhile mentioning that this reference is

prior to spread of COVID-19 pandemic and adversities of lockdown.

2.

In considered opinion of this Tribunal, it is established that either the claimant of this dispute is not

interested to prosecute his claim or the said dispute is no more in existence.

3.

It is therefore just & proper to pass an award considering “no dispute” between the parties.

4.

The award is passed as above. The award be sent for publication U/s 17(1) of Industrial Disputes Act.

RADHA MOHAN CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 24 Qjojh] 2021

—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k vgenkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 173@2019½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS]

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 24-02-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-12011@60@2019-vkbZvkj ¼ch-1)]

Mh- xqgk] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 24th February, 2021

S.O. 169.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 173/2019) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank

of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 24.02.2021.

[No. L-12011/60/2019-IR(B-1)]

D. GUHA, Under Secy.

462 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Radha Mohan Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer

Dated 11th February, 2021

Reference (CGITA) No. 173/2019

1.

The Chief General Manager,

State Bank of India, Local Head Office, 8th Floor, Lal Darwaja,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

2.

The Proprietor,

M/s. Hardik Construction,

M-177/2114, Surya Apartment, Opp. Medical Complex,

Sola Road, Naranpura,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) - 380054

…First Parties

V/s

The National General Secretary,

Akhil Bhartiya Safai Mazdoor Sangh,

F-1/F-10, Zavernagar Soceity, Harni Varsia Road,

Vadodara (Gujarat) – 390022

…Second Party

Present: None on behalf of Claimant(s)

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India have in exercise of powers conferred

by the Clause (d) of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2A of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred

the below mentioned dispute vide reference adjudication Order No. L-12011/60/2019-IR (B-I) dated 13.12.2019

for adjudication to this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the dispute raised by Akhil Safai Mazdoor Sangh, Vadodara against the management of State

Bank of India, LHO, Ahmedabad and their contractor, M/s Hardik Constructions, Ahmedabad over alleged

illegal termination of services of Shri Bhavnik Hasmukhbhai Vaghela, Part time sweeper and demand for

reinstatement in services with back wages w.e.f. 25.07.2018 is legal, just and proper? If so, to what relief

the concerned workman, Shri Bhavnik Hasmukhbhai Vaghela, Part time sweeper is entitled to and from

which date and what other direction are necessary in the matter?”

1.

The same reference was received in this Tribunal on 13th December 2019. The Ministry had directed

the party raising the dispute to file his statement of claim complete with relevant documents with the Tribunal

within 15 days of receipt of this order of reference as per provision made under Rule 10 (B) of Industrial

Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. This order of reference had been sent to all the parties as well as this Tribunal

through registered post by the Ministry. Therefore, it is inferred that the same had been delivered to all the

parties including claimants. A period of more than a year has been elapsed but none has appeared and filed the

statement of claim as directed and expected by the Ministry. It is worthwhile mentioning that this reference is

prior to spread of COVID-19 pandemic and adversities of lockdown.

2.

In considered opinion of this Tribunal, it is established that either the claimant of this dispute is not

interested to prosecute his claim or the said dispute is no more in existence.

3.

It is therefore just & proper to pass an award considering “no dispute” between the parties.

4.

The award is passed as above. The award be sent for publication U/s 17(1) of Industrial Disputes Act.

RADHA MOHAN CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

463

ubZ fnYyh] 24 Qjojh] 2021

—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 171@2019½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS]

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 24-02-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-12011@57@2019-vkbZvkj ¼ch-1)]

Mh- xqgk] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 24th February, 2021

S.O. 170.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 171/2019) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank

of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 24.02.2021.

[No. L-12011/57/2019-IR(B-1)]

D. GUHA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Radha Mohan Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer

Dated 11th February, 2021

Reference (CGITA) No. 171/2019

1.

The Chief General Manager,

State Bank of India, Local Head Office, 8th Floor, Lal Darwaja,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

2.

The Proprietor,

M/s. Hardik Construction,

M-177/2114, Surya Apartment, Opp. Medical Complex,

Sola Road, Naranpura,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) - 380054

…First Parties

V/s

The National General Secretary,

Akhil Bhartiya Safai Mazdoor Sangh,

F-1/F-10, Zavernagar Soceity, Harni Varsia Road,

Vadodara (Gujarat) – 390022

…Second Party

Present: None on behalf of Claimant(s)

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India have in exercise of powers conferred

by the Clause (d) of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2A of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred

the below mentioned dispute vide reference adjudication Order No. L-12011/57/2019-IR (B-I) dated 16.12.2019

for adjudication to this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the dispute raised by Akhil Safai Mazdoor Sangh, Vadodara against the management of State

Bank of India, LHO, Ahmedabad and their contractor, M/s Hardik Constructions, Ahmedabad over alleged

illegal termination of services of Shri Akshay Bipinbhai Chouhan, Part time sweeper and demand for

reinstatement in services with back wages w.e.f. 25.07.2018 is legal, just and proper? If so, to what relief

the concerned workman, Shri Akshay Bipinbhai Chouhan, Part time sweeper is entitled to and from which

date and what other direction are necessary in the matter?”

464 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1.

The same reference was received in this Tribunal on 16th December 2019. The Ministry had directed

the party raising the dispute to file his statement of claim complete with relevant documents with the Tribunal

within 15 days of receipt of this order of reference as per provision made under Rule 10 (B) of Industrial

Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. This order of reference had been sent to all the parties as well as this Tribunal

through registered post by the Ministry. Therefore, it is inferred that the same had been delivered to all the

parties including claimants. A period of more than a year has been elapsed but none has appeared and filed the

statement of claim as directed and expected by the Ministry. It is worthwhile mentioning that this reference is

prior to spread of COVID-19 pandemic and adversities of lockdown.

2.

In considered opinion of this Tribunal, it is established that either the claimant of this dispute is not

interested to prosecute his claim or the said dispute is no more in existence.

3.

It is therefore just & proper to pass an award considering “no dispute” between the parties.

4.

The award is passed as above. The award be sent for publication U/s 17(1) of Industrial Disputes Act.

RADHA MOHAN CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 24 Qjojh] 2021

—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad ds izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k vgenkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 174@2019½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS]

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 24-02-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-12011@61@2019-vkbZvkj ¼ch-1)]

Mh- xqgk] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 24th February, 2021

S.O. 171.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 174/2019) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank

of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 24.02.2021.

[No. L-12011/61/2019-IR(B-1)]

D. GUHA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present: Radha Mohan Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer

Dated 11th February, 2021

Reference (CGITA) No. 174/2019

1.

The Chief General Manager,

State Bank of India, Local Head Office, 8th Floor, Lal Darwaja,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

2.

The Proprietor,

M/s. Hardik Construction,

M-177/2114, Surya Apartment, Opp. Medical Complex,

Sola Road, Naranpura,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) - 380054

…First Parties

V/s

The National General Secretary,

Akhil Bhartiya Safai Mazdoor Sangh,

F-1/F-10, Zavernagar Soceity, Harni Varsia Road,

Vadodara (Gujarat) – 390022

…Second Party

Present: None on behalf of Claimant(s)

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

465

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India have in exercise of powers conferred

by the Clause (d) of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2A of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred

the below mentioned dispute vide reference adjudication Order No. L-12011/61/2019-IR (B-I) dated 16.12.2019

for adjudication to this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the dispute raised by Akhil Safai Mazdoor Sangh, Vadodara against the management of State

Bank of India, LHO, Ahmedabad and their contractor, M/s Hardik Constructions, Ahmedabad over

alleged illegal termination of services of Shri Reena Jagdishbhai Vaghela, Part time sweeper and

demand for reinstatement in services with back wages w.e.f. 25.07.2018 is legal, just and proper? If so,

to what relief the concerned workman, Shri Reena Jagdishbhai Vaghela, Part time sweeper is entitled to

and from which date and what other direction are necessary in the matter?”

1.

The same reference was received in this Tribunal on 16th December 2019. The Ministry had directed

the party raising the dispute to file his statement of claim complete with relevant documents with the Tribunal

within 15 days of receipt of this order of reference as per provision made under Rule 10 (B) of Industrial

Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. This order of reference had been sent to all the parties as well as this Tribunal

through registered post by the Ministry. Therefore, it is inferred that the same had been delivered to all the

parties including claimants. A period of more than a year has been elapsed but none has appeared and filed the

statement of claim as directed and expected by the Ministry. It is worthwhile mentioning that this reference is

prior to spread of COVID-19 pandemic and adversities of lockdown.

2.

In considered opinion of this Tribunal, it is established that either the claimant of this dispute is not

interested to prosecute his claim or the said dispute is no more in existence.

3.

It is therefore just & proper to pass an award considering “no dispute” between the parties.

4.

The award is passed as above. The award be sent for publication U/s 17(1) of Industrial Disputes Act.

RADHA MOHAN CHATURVEDI, Presiding Office

ubZ fnYyh] 24 Qjojh] 2021

—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad ds izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k vgenkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 172@2019½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS]

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 24-02-2021 izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-12011@59@2019-vkbZvkj ¼ch-1)]

Mh- xqgk] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 24th February, 2021

S.O. 172.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 172/2019) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank

of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 24.02.2021.

[No. L-12011/59/2019-IR(B-1)]

D. GUHA, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present : Radha Mohan Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer

Dated 11th February, 2021

Reference (CGITA) No. 172/2019

1.

The Chief General Manager,

State Bank of India, Local Head Office, 8th Floor, Lal Darwaja,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001

466 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2.

The Proprietor,

M/s. Hardik Construction,

M-177/2114, Surya Apartment, Opp. Medical Complex,

Sola Road, Naranpura,

Ahmedabad (Gujarat) - 380054

…First Parties

V/s

The National General Secretary,

Akhil Bhartiya Safai Mazdoor Sangh,

F-1/F-10, Zavernagar Soceity, Harni Varsia Road,

Vadodara (Gujarat) – 390022

…Second Party

Present: None on behalf of Claimant(s)

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India have in exercise of powers conferred

by the Clause (d) of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2A of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred

the below mentioned dispute vide reference adjudication Order No. L-12011/59/2019-IR (B-I) dated 13.12.2019

for adjudication to this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the dispute raised by Akhil Safai Mazdoor Sangh, Vadodara against the management of State

Bank of India, LHO, Ahmedabad and their contractor, M/s Hardik Constructions, Ahmedabad over

alleged illegal termination of services of Smt. Meenaben Prakashbhai, Part time sweeper and demand

for reinstatement in services with back wages w.e.f. 25.07.2018 is legal, just and proper? If so, to what

relief the concerned workman, Smt. Meenaben Prakashbhai, Part time sweeper is entitled to and from

which date and what other direction are necessary in the matter?”

1.

The same reference was received in this Tribunal on 13th December 2019. The Ministry had directed

the party raising the dispute to file her statement of claim complete with relevant documents with the Tribunal

within 15 days of receipt of this order of reference as per provision made under Rule 10 (B) of Industrial

Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. This order of reference had been sent to all the parties as well as this Tribunal

through registered post by the Ministry. Therefore, it is inferred that the same had been delivered to all the

parties including claimants. A period of more than a year has been elapsed but none has appeared and filed the

statement of claim as directed and expected by the Ministry. It is worthwhile mentioning that this reference is

prior to spread of COVID-19 pandemic and adversities of lockdown.

2.

In considered opinion of this Tribunal, it is established that either the claimant of this dispute is not

interested to prosecute his claim or the said dispute is no more in existence.

3.

It is therefore just & proper to pass an award considering “no dispute” between the parties.

4.

The award is passed as above. The award be sent for publication U/s 17(1) of Industrial Disputes Act.

RADHA MOHAN CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

नई दिल् ली, 26 फरवरी, 2021

का.आ. 173.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्री

सरकार ृरमाणु ऊिाि अन् वेषण और अनुसंिान जवभाग, ृरमाणु ऊिाि जवभाग, ि ृुर (राि) के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध

जन ोिकों और श्री छगन लाल िानका, कामगार के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्ििष्ट औद्योजगक जववाि में केन्री सरकार

औद्योजगक अजिकरण- सि- श्रम न् ा ाल , ि ृुर के ृंचाट (संिभि सं्‍ ा 27/2011) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में

दि ा ा ग ा िज, प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्री सरकार को 03.02.2021 को प्राप्त हुआ ा।

[सं. एल-14012/2/2009-आईआर (डी ू)]

डी.के.जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

467

New Delhi, the 26th February, 2021

S.O. 173.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 27/2011) of the Central Government Industrial-Tribunal-cum

Labour Court, Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

The Atomic Mineral Directorate for Exploration and Research, Department of Atomic Energy, Jaipur (raj) and

Shri chhagan Lal Dhanka ,Worker which was received by the Central Government on 03.02.2021.

[No. L-14012/2/2009 IR-(DU)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

jk/kk eksgu prqosZnh

ihBklhu vf/kdkjh

lh-th-vkbZ-Vh- izdj.k la- 27@2011 ReferenceNo.L-14012/2/2009-IR(DU) Dated:13.7.2011

Jh Nxu yky /kkudk iq= Jh xqykc pUn /kkudk fuoklh xzke ';ksiqj] /kkudksa dk eqgYyk izrki uxj] lkaxkusj]

t;iqjA

ijek.kq [kkfut vUos"k.k ,oa vuqla/kku funs'kky; if'pe {ks=]

ijek.kq mtkZ foHkkx] Hkkjr ljdkj ,- ,e- Mh- dEiysDl- lsDVj&5]

foLrkj izrki uxj lkaxkusj] t;iqj& }kjk funs'kd

---vizkFkhZ@foi{kh

izkFkhZx.k dh rjQ ls % Jh dq.kky jkor vf/koDrk

vizkFkhZx.k dh rjQ ls % Jh nsos'k dqekj caly vf/koDrk

fnukad % 29-12-2020

1-

Je ,oa fu;kstu ea=ky; Hkkjr ljdkj ubZ fnYyh }kjk fnukad 13-07-2011 dks vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e

1947 ¼ftls vkxs ek= vf/kfu;e dgk tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 10 ¼1½ ¼Mh½ ds vUrxZr iznRr 'kfDr;ks ds vuqlj.k esa

mi;qZDr ikaWapksa izkFkhZx.k ds laEc/k esa fuEukafdr ¼lesfdr :i esa½ fookn U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq bl vf/kdj.k dks lanfHkZr

fd;s x;s %&

“Whether the action of the Management of Atomic Mineral Directorate for Exploration and Research,

Department of Atomic Energy, Jaipur in terminating the services of (1) Sh. Shri Ram Sharma s/o

Shri Lallu Lal Sharma, (2) Shri Dhanna Lal s/o Shri Jagdish Bairwa, (3) Shri Rakesh Kumar Upadhyay

s/o Shri Hari Kishan Sharma, (4) Shri Chhagan Lal Dhanka s/o Shri Gulab Chand Dhanka and (5)

Shri Manoj Kumar Pipliwal s/o Shri kanhaiya Lal Pipliwal. w.e.f. 30.04.2008 is legal and justified?

What relief the workmen are entitled to? ’’

2-

mi;qZDr ikWapksa fookn bl vf/kdj.k dks izkIr gksus ij mHk;i{k dks vkgwr djrs gq,& izkFkhZx.k dks funsZ'k

fn;k x;k fd os vius nkos dk vfHkdFku izLrqr djasA rnqijkar izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls fnukad 04-10-2011 dks nkos ds

vfHkdFku izLrqr fd;s x;sA izkFkhZx.k ds dFku la{ksi esa bl izdkj of.kZr gSaA izkFkhZx.k dks 05-07-2005 ls 10-01-2006

ds e/; fofHkUu frfFk;ksa ij prqFkZ Js.kh ¼gsYij rduhdh lgk;d½ ds in ij vizkFkhZ }kjk fu;qDr fd;k x;kA

izkFkhZx.k iRFkj ds uewuksa dh filkbZ] NukbZ] f?klkbZ o vU; dk;kZy;h dk;Z vizkFkhZ ds vf/kdkfj;kas ds fn'kk funsZ'k ij

djrs FksA vizkFkhZ laLFkku m|ksx dh ifjHkk"kk esa vkrk gSaA izkFkhZx.k dks vizkFkhZ us fnukad 30-04-2008 dks voS/k :Ik ls

lsok eqDr dj fn;kA

3-

izkFkhZx.k o vizkFkhZ ds e/; fu;kstd&deZdkj ds laca/k FksA izkFkhZx.k dh lsok eqfDr ls iwoZ /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½

vf/kfu;e ds vuqlkj uksfVl@uksfVl osru o {kfriwfrZ jkf'k dk Hkqxrku izkFkhZx.k dks ugha fd;k x;kA izkFkhZx.k ls tks

dk;Z djok;k tk jgk Fkk og LFkkbZ izd`fr dk Fkk o vkt Hkh vU; Jfedkas ls djok;k tk jgk gSA izkFkhZx.k us 240

fnu ls vf/kd fnuksa rd yxkrkj dk;Z fd;k gSA vizkFkhZ us Jfedksa dh ofj"Brk lwph ugha cukbZ u gh dksbZ ?kjsyw

tkWap dh& rFkk vuqfpr Je O;ogkj fd;kA bl izdkj /kkjk 25] ¼,Q½@ ¼th½@ ¼,p½ vf/kfu;e o fu;e 77 o 78

ds izko/kkuks dk mYya?ku fd;k gSA izkFkhZx.k lsok eqfDr ds Ik'pkr ls csjkstxkj gaSA vr% fnukad 30-04-2008 dks dh

xbZ izkFkhZx.k dh lsok lekfIr dks voS| ?kksf"kr djrs gq, izkFkhZx.k dks foxr osru o ifjykHkksa lfgr lsok esa cgky

fd;k tkosA

468 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4-

vizkFkhZ@foi{kh us fnukad 04-07-2012 dks ikWapks izdj.kksa esa oknksÙkj izLrqr djrs gq, ;g dgk gSa fd izkFkhZx.k

dks fdlh in ij fu;qfDr ugha nh xbZ] cfYd vko';d dk;Z djus ds fy, vkdfLed Jfed ds :Ik esa va'kdkyhu

lafonk ds vk/kkj ij j[kk x;k FkkA blfy, lsok eqfDr dk iz'u gh mRiUu ugha gksrk gSA vizkFkhZ m|ksx dh Js.kh esa

ugha vkrk gSA izkFkhZx.k dks dk;Z miyC/krk ij tkjh fufonk o fu/kkZfjr ctV esa dk;Z lEiUu djus gsrq j[kk tkus ls

,slh fu;qfDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2 ¼vks vks½s ¼ch ch½ ds vUrZxr vkrh gS o /kkjk 25&,Q ds izko/kku vkd`"V gh ughs

gksrs gSaA izkFkhZx.k ,d o"kZ esa 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z djuk izekf.kr ugha dj ik;s gSaA vizkFkhZ }kjk vf/kfu;e o

fu;eksa dh vogsyuk ugha dh xbZ gS u gh dksbZ vuqfpr Je vH;kl fd;k x;k gSaA fdlh vU; Jfed dks dk;Z gsrq

ugha yxk;k x;k gSA vr% okn vLohdkj fd;s tkosaA

5-

izkFkhZx.k us 24-09-2012 dks oknksRrj dk [kaMu djrs gq, vfrfjDr dFku Hkh izLrqr fd;s gSa&vkSj iqu% nkos

ds vfHkdFkuksa dks Lohdkj djus dk fuosnu fd;k gSaA

6-

mi;qZDr ikWapksa fookn izdj.kksa esa izkFkhZx.k ds vfHkdFku o oknksRrj leku gSa rFkk izkFkhZx.k dh lsok dh

izd`fr o lsok lekfIr dh frfFk Hkh leku gh gSaA blfy, bu ikWapksa fooknks esa mRiUu fooknfcanq leku gksus ls bu

fooknksa dk vf/kfu.kZ;u ,dhd`r :Ik ls mHk;i{k dh lgefr ls fd;k tk jgk gSA

7-

izkFkhZx.k us vius vius nkos ds vfHkdFku ds leZFku gsrq lk{; esa Lo;a izkFkhZ ,- M-& 1 Jh jke 'ekZ]

Jh /kUuk yky] Jh jkds'k dqekj mik/;k;] Jh Nxu yky /kkudk ,oa Jh eukst dqekj ihiyhoky dks ijhf{kr fd;k

gSA izys[kh; lk{; esa izn'kZ 1 ls 17 rd izys[kkas dks Jh jke 'kekZ ls lacaf/kr izdj.k esa iznf'kZr fd;k gSA pwafd bu

ikWapksa gh izdj.kksa esa okndkj.k] i{kdkj o lk{; dh izd`fr leku gS& mHk;i{k dh lgefr ls fookn la- 24@2011

Jh jke 'kekZ cuke funs'kd] ijek.kq [kkfut vUos"k.k ,oa vuqla/kku esa mHk;i{k }kjk izLrqr lk{; dks gh ikWapksa fooknks

ds laca/k esa izHkkoh ekudj foospu gsrq xzg.k fd;k tk jgk gSA

blh Øe esa foi{kh@vizkFkhZ us vius lk{; esa ,u- ,- M- 1 fouksn dqekj lh- ds- ¼lgk- dkfeZd vf/kdkjh½ dks ijh{kr

fd;k o izn'kZ vkj&1 ls vkj&6 izys[kksa dks iznf'kZr fd;k gSA

8-

fnukad 22-12-2017 dks bl vf/kdj.k }kjk ikWapksa fooknksa esa vf/kfu.kZ; ikfjr dj izkFkhZx.k dks dksbZ vuqrks"k

ikus dk vf/kdkjh ugha ekurs gq, nkoksa dks fujLr dj fn;k x;kA bl vf/kfu.kZ; ds fo:} izkFkhZx.k us eku- mPp

U;k;ky; esa fjV ;kfpdk izLrqr dhA eku- jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us fnukad 28-08-2019 dks fu.kZ; ikfjr djrs gq,

fjV ;kfpdk Lohdkj dj vf/kfu.kZ; fnukad 22-12-2017 dks vikLr dj fn;k rFkk ekeys bl vf/kdj.k dks iqu%

fofuf'pr djus gsrq izfrizsf"kr dj fn;sA eku- mPp U;k;ky; es ;g funsZ'k fn;k fd izkFkhZx.k }kjk ,usDlj&1

¼izkFkZuki= fnukad 27-11-2012½ ds ek/;e ls visf{kr izys[kksa dk]s tks foi{kh ds ikl miyC/k gS Je U;k;ky; ds le{k

izLrqr fd;k tkosa&rFkk izkFkhZx.k dks bu vfHkys[kksa dks ijhf{kr djus rFkk vius i{k dks LFkkfir djus dk leqfpr

volj fn;k tkosA

bl fu.kZ; ds vuqlj.k esa foi{kh dks izys[kksa ds izLrqrhdj.k dk funsZ'k fn;k x;k rFkk izLrqfrdj.k ds

mijkUr mHk;i{k dks vfrfjDr lk{; izLrqr djus dk volj Hkh fn;k x;kA izkFkhZ us vius lk{; esa iqu% ,- M- 1

Jh jke 'kekZ dks ijhf{kr fd;k rFkk vfrfjDr izys[kh lk{; esa izn'kZ W 17 iznf'kZr fd;kA foi{kh@vizkFkhZ us

vfrfjDr lk{; esa ,u- ,- M- 2 lfPpnkuaUn uk;d mi{ks=h; funs'kd o ,u- ,- M- 3 y[ku yky 'kekZ dks ijhf{kr

fd;k o izys[kh; lk{; esa izn'kZ vkj 7 ls vkj 13 rd izys[k iznf'kZr fd;sA

9-

fnukad 03-11-2020 ls 09-12-2020 rd fofHkUu frfFk;ksa ij mHk;i{k ds rdZ&forZd lqus x;s o miyC/k lk{;

dk ifj'khyu fd;k x;kA

10-

izkFkhZx.k ds vfHkHkk"kd dk ;g izeq[k rdZ gS fd ,usDlj&1 izkFkZuki= fnukad 27-11-2012 esa of.kZr o okafNr

izys[kksa dks vizkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr gh ugha fd;k x;k gS & u gh izLrqr u djus dk djus dk dksbZ larqf"Vizn dkj.k

izLrqr fd;k gSA blfy, vizkFkhZ ds fo:} ;g izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk dh tkos fd ;fn og izkfFkZr vfHkys[kksa dks izLrqr

djrs rks izkFkhZx.k dk foi{kh ds v/khu fu;fer 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Zjr jgus dk rF; izekf.kr gks tkrkA vizkFkhZ

us vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼Mh½ dh ikyuk u djrs gq, mifLFkfr dk dksbZ vfHkys[k la/kkfjr ugha fd;kA tks izys[k

foi{kh us u"V gks tkus ds dkj.k izLrqr ugha dj ikuk dgk gS muds u"V djus laca/kh dksbZ lk{; izLrqr gh ugha dh

gSaA lk{kh Jhjke 'kekZ ds iwoZorhZ 'kiFki= esa fu;qfDr frfFk 06-07-2005 =qfV o'k vafdr gks xbZ gS ftls 06-07-2006 gh

i<+k tkos tks Ik'pkrorhZ vfrfjDr lk{; 'kiFki= esa vfdr gSA vfHkys[kksa dks u"V djus dk dksbZ izek.k gh ugha gSA

foi{kh lk{kh y[ku yky Lohdkj djrk gS fd xsV jftLVj esa izfof"V fd;s fcuk dksbZ vUnj ugh tk ldrk gSA fdarq

ogh xsV jftLVj foi{kh us is'k ugh fd;k gSA Bsdsnkj }kjk fu;qfDr dk rdZ foi{kh us fn;k gS fdarq Bsdsnkj dk dksbZ

ykbZlsal izLrqr gh ugh fd;k gSaA vr% izkFkhZx.k ds nkoksa dks Lohdkj dj izkfFkZr vuqrks"k iznku fd;k tkosA mUgksaus

vius rdksZ ds leZFku esa fuEukafdr U;kf;d n`"Vkar izLrqr fd;s%

1- cSaxyksj okVj lIykbZ ,aM lhojst cksMZ cuke vkj- jktIik o vU; 1978 ,- vkbZ- vkj- 548

2- fd'ku flag cuke ,fDtfDVo bath- gfj;k.kk LVsV ,xzh- ekdsZfVax cksMZ ,- vkbZ- vkj- 2010 lq- dksVZ] ¼lIyh-½

787

3- Mk;jsDVj fQ'kjht VfeZuy fMohtu cuke Hkhdw HkkbZ es?kkth HkkbZ pkoM+k ,- vkbZ- vkj- 2010 lq- dksVZ] 1236

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

469

4- vkj- ,e- ;sykrh cuke vfl- ,DthD;wfVo bathfu;j flfoy vihy la- 5124@2004 fu.kZ;& 07-11-2005-

5- esfduksu eSadth fy- cuke esfduksu ,EiykbZt ;wfu;u flfoy vihy la- 5319@2008 lq- dksVZ] fu.kZ;&

25-02-2015-

6- fizalhiy Mwaxj dkWayst chdkusj cuke vkseizdk'k 1999 ysc- vkbZ- lh- 97 ¼jktLFkku½

7- ch- Mh- vks- izkxiqj cuke ;ksfxaUnj dqekj 2008 ¼118½ ,Q- ,y- vkj- 460 ¼fg- izns'k½

11-

vizkFkhZ ds vfHkHkk"kd dk ;g izeq[k rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k us vius iq"V lk{; ls ;g izekf.kr gh ugha fd;k gS

fd mUgksaus vizkFkhZ ds v/khu 240 fnu ls vf/kd&,d o"kZ dh vof/k esa dk;Z fd;k tcfd ;g fl}hHkkj izkFkhZx.k ij

gh vkjksfir gSA izkFkhZ Jhjke 'kekZ ¼o vU; izkFkhZx.k½ us Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mUgsa dksbZ fu;qfDr i= ugha feyk gS u gh

dksbZ vkosnu fu;qfDr gsrq fn;kA o"kZ 2005 ls 2008 rd ,d o"kZ esa fdrus fdrus fnu dk;Z fd;k ;g Hkh ;kn ugha

gSA izn'kZ W- 3 o W- 7 dk mYys[k djrs gq, mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ us Bsds ij dk;Z djus gsrq vkosnu fd;k

gSA izkFkhZx.k us ;g Hkh Lohdkj fd;k gS fd vuqyXud&3 ¼Ex. R/5½ mlls lacaf/kr gS rFkk blesa vfdar dk;Z fnol

lgh gS izn'kZ W- 10 ls W- 12 mlds Hkqxrku ls lacaf/kr gSA LohdkjksfDr ds mijkaUr fdlh izek.k dh vko';drk

'ks"k ugha jgrh gSA lk{; dh bl fLFkfr esa izkFkhZx.k dk ;g vk{ksi Lohdk;Z ugha gSa fd vizkFkhZ us mifLFkfr vfHkys[k

dk la/kkj.k ugha fd;k vFkok izLrqr ugha fd;k gSaS blfy, vizkFkhZ ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk dk dksbZ vk/kkj ugha

gSA izkFkhZ dks lafonk ds vk/kkj ij dk;Z djus gsrq fu;r mn~s'; ls j[kk x;k Fkk blfy, Hkh os vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25

¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa dk laj{k.k ugh ik ldrs gaSA vizkFkhZ vUos"k.k ,oa vuqla/kku ds dk;Z ls lac} gS tks m|ksx dh

ifjHkk"kk esa ugha vkrk gSA vr% okn vLohdkj fd;s tkosaA mUgksus vius rdZ ds leZFku esa fuEukafdr U;kf;d n`"Vkar

o vfHkys[k la/kkj.k vof/k dh foHkkxh; rkfydk dh izfr izLrqr dh gS%

1- lqjsUnz uxj fMfLVªDV iapk;r cuke Mk;k HkkbZ vejflag flfoy vihy la- 6511@2005 fu.kZ; 25-10-2005

¼lqizhe dksVZ½A

2- ,e- ih- bysfDVªflVh cksMZ cuke gfjjke flfoy vihy la- 2240@2001 fu.kZ; 27-09-2004 ¼lqizhe dksVZ½A

3- LVsV vkWaQ xqtjkr cuke izre flag ujflag ijekj ¼2001½ 9 lqizhe dksVZ dslst 713A

12-

mHk;i{k ds rdksZ] lk{; ,oa U;kf;d n`"Vkarks esa ikfjr fof/k ij lE;d fopkj djus ds mijkaUr bu fooknksa esa

fuEukafdr fookn fcanq& U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq mRiUu gq, gSa%

1- D;k vizkFkhZ@foi{kh] vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2 ¼j½ ds vFkkZUrxZr m|ksx gS\

---izkFkhZx.k

2- D;k izkFkhZx.k dks vizkFkhZ }kjk prqFkZ Js.kh ¼gsYij rduhdh lgk;d½ ds in ij tqykbZ 2005 ls tqykbZ 2006

ds e/; fu;qDr fd;k x;k rFkk izkFkhZx.k us vizkFkhZ ds v/khu 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z ,d dsys.Mj& o"kZ esa

fd;k gS\

---izkFkhZx.k

3- D;k foi{kh }kjk izkFkhZx.k dh lsok lekfIr ds iwoZ vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkukas dk vuqikyu

ugha fd;k x;k\

---izkFkhZx.k

4- D;k foi{kh }kjk deZdkjksa dh ofj"Brk lwph ugha cukbZ xbZ ,oa izkFkhZx.k dh lsok lekIr djus ds mijkaUr

izkFkhZx.k ls dfu"Brj O;fDr;ksa dks lsok esa j[kk x;k\

---izkFkhZx.k

5- vuqrks"k\

mHk;i{k ds rdkasZ lk{; ,oa fof/k ij fopkj ds mijkaUr izR;sd fopkj.kh; fcUnq ij fofu'p; bl izdkj gS%

13-

izkFkhZx.k dk ;g dFku gS fd vizkFkhZ laLFkku dh tks xfrfof/k;kWa gSa] og m|ksx dh ifjHkk"kk esa vkrh gSaA

iRFkj ds uewuksa ds ijh{k.k ls ;wjsfu;e dh igpku gksrh Fkh] mlh ds vk/kkj ij ;wjsfu;e dk mRiknu gksrk FkkA blds

foijhr foi{kh dk ;g rdZ gS fd vizkFkhZ ijek.kq [kfut] vUos"k.k o vuqla/kku ds dk;Z esa jr gS tks m|ksx dh

ifjHkk"kk esa ugha vkrk gSA

14-

bl lUnHkZ esa foi{kh lk{kh fouksn dqekj lh- ds- dk izfrijh{kk esa fd;k x;k ;g dFku egRoiw.kZ gS fd

uewuksa ds ijh{k.k ls ;g irk pyrk gS fd inkFkZ ;wjsfu;e gS vFkok ugha\ ;fn ;wjsfu;e gksrk gS rks mldk mi;ksx

ijek.kq la;a= esa fo|qr mRiknu esa iz;ksx fd;k tkrk gSA bl izdkj mRikfnr fo|qr miHkksDrkvksa iz;ksx esa vkrh gSA

bl leLr izfØ;k esa ekuo ,oa e'khu dk iz;ksx gksrk gSA bl dFku ls ;g mi/kkj.kk ljyrk ls dh tk ldrh gS

fd mRikfnr fo|qr ds miHkksDrkvksa dks foØ; ls izfrQy Lo:i /kujkf'k izkIr gksrh gh gSA vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2 ¼j½

ds vUrZxr ßm|ksxÞ ls fu;kstdksa dk dksbZ dkjckj] O;olk;] miØe] fofuekZ.k ;k vkthfodk vfHkizsr gSaA izkFkhZx.k dh

vksj ls izLrqr fu.kZ; cSaxyksj okVj lIykbZ ,aM lhojst cksMZ cuke vkj- jktIik esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; us dfri;

egRoiw.kZ fn'kk funsZ'k izfrikfnr fd;s gS&rnquqlkj tgkWa dk;Zdykiks ds lapkyu gsrq ra=kRed O;oLFkk tks fu;kstd o

470 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

deZdkjksa ds lgdkj ls laxfBr gks] ftlesa lh/kk o lkjoku rRo O;olkf;d gks] tks ekuo mi;ksx ;k lsokFkZ mRiknu

o mlds forj.k ls lacaf/kr gks& ,slk midze Þm|ksxß gksrk gSA

15-

bl laca/k esa ykHk] gsrqd ;k ykHkkFkZ mn~s'; dh vuqifLFkfr vlaxr gksrh gS rFkk fu;kstd& fu;ksftr ds

e/; laca/kijd dk;Zdyki ij gh cy nsrs gq, fu/kkZj.k visf{kr gksrk gSA foi{kh }kjk LVsV vkWaQ xqtjkr cuke izre

flag ujflag ijekj ds fu.kZ; esa eku- lokZsPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vf/ker dk voyac ysrs gq, ;g dgk gS fd Hkkjr

ljdkj ds ijek.kq mtkZ foHkkx ds v/khu lapkfyr vUos"k.k laLFkku dks m|ksx dh ifjHkk"kk esa ugh j[kk tk ldrk gS

D;ksafd ;g laizHkqrk iw.kZ d`R; dk ,d Hkkx gSA izkFkhZ us ,sls dksbZ rF; izLrqr ugha fd;s gS ftlls vizkFkhZ ds m|ksx

gksus dk rF; fu"dkf"kZr fd;k tk ldsA eSaus bl rdZ o izfrikfnr fof/k ij euu fd;k gSA

16-

izkFkhZ us ;g rF; HkyhHkkWfr izekf.kr fd;k gS fd foi{kh@vizkFkhZ ;|fi ijek.kq mtkZ foHkkx ds v/khu ijek.kq

[kfut vUos"k.k o vuqla/kku dk dk;Z djrk gS& fdarq vizkFkhZ }kjk laikfnr dk;Zdyki tSlk fd foi{kh ds lk{kh

fouksn dqekj lh- ds- }kjk of.kZr gSa& foi{kh dks Þm|ksxß dh ifjHkk"kk ds varxZr ykus dk vk/kkj izdV gksrs gSaSA uewuksa

gsrq fy;s x;s [kfut inkFkksZ dk ijh{k.k o rnqijkar mudk fo|qr ds O;olkf;d mRiknu esa iz;ksx] fuf'pr :Ik ls

Þm|ksxßesa lapkfyr izfØ;k ekuh tk ldrh gS foi{kh laLFkku ijek.kq mtkZ foHkkx dk vax gS tks ijek.kq fo|qr dk

mRiknu Hkh djrk gSA

17-

vf/kfu;e esa micaf/kr ifjHkk"kk o loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vf/kerksa ds izdk'k esa foi{kh }kjk lk{; esa

iznf'kZr i= iznZ'k vkj&1 esa of.kZr fofu'p; ftlesa Je o fof/k ea=ky; }kjk foi{kh laLFkku dks vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk

2 ¼j½ ds vUrZxr ßm|ksxÞ ugha ekuk x;k gS& fdlh izdkj Lohdk;Z ,oa xzkà; ugha gSA foi{kh laLFkku esa ,sls [kfut

dk ijh{k.k o vuqla/kku fd;k tkrk gS& tks ;wjsfu;e izekf.kr gksus ij fo|qr ds O;olkf;d mRiknu esa iz;qDr gksrk

gS& ;g fookfnr ugha gS fd bl izdkj mRikfnr fo|qr ds fodz; ls foi{kh dks O;olkf;d /kuktZu gksrk gSA blfy,

foi{kh laLFkku fuf'pr :Ik ls ßm|ksxÞ gksuk izekf.kr gksrk gSA vr% ;g fcanq izkFkhZx.k ds i{k esa fu.kZr fd;k tkrk

gSaA

18-

1- bl lanHkZ esa izkFkhZ Jhjke 'kekZ us viuh eq[; ijh{kk fnukad 30-01-2020 esa dgk gS fd mldh fu;qfDr

vizkFkhZ fu;kstd ds ;gkWa 06-07-2006 dks prqFkZ Js.kh ¼rduhdh lgk;d½ ds in ij gqbZ FkhA izkFkhZ us

vius iwoZ 'kiFk i= fnukad 06-07-2014 esa fu;qfDr frfFk 06-07-2005 of.kZr dh gS] fdarq vfHkHkk'kd izkFkhZ

us bls Vad.k dh =qfV dgrs gq, 06-07-2006 gh ekuus dk fuosnu fd;k & bl fuosnu ij foi{kh us

vkifRr ugha dh gS& vr% fu;qfDr frfFk 06-07-2006 gh lk{; esa xzg.k dh tk jgh gSaA

19-

izkFkhZ us vkxkeh dFku esa 29-04-2008 rd yxkrkj dk;Z djuk o 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z djuk Hkh dgk

gSA izkFkhZ us Lo;a dh mifLFkfr foi{kh }kjk la/kkfjr xsV&jftLVj esa djuk dgk gSA izkFkhZx.k dk ;g vk{ksi gS fd

foi{kh us eku- mPp U;k;ky; }kjk fn;s x;s funsZ'k ds mijkar Hkh ,usDlj&1 ¼izkFkZuki= fnukad 27-11-2012½ esa of.kZr

vfHkys[k izLrqr ugha fd;k gS&;fn og okafNr vfHkys[k izLrqr fd;k tkrk rks izkFkhZx.k dh mifLFkfr rFkk 240 fnu

ls vf/kd foi{kh ds v/khu yxkrkj dk;Z fd;k tkuk izekf.kr gks tkrkA vr% foi{kh ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk dh

tkosaA foi{kh dk ;g rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k dks oLrqr% va'kdkyhu lafonk ds vk/kkj ij dke ij fy;k x;k FkkA foHkkx

}kjk eLVj jksy j[kk tkrk Fkk ftlesa mifLFkr gkus ij izkFkhZ dh mifLFkfr vafdr dh tkrh FkhA izR;sd ekg esa

Jfed }kjk fd;s x;s dk;Z fnolksa ds vuqlkj mldk Hkqxrku fd;k x;k gSA ftl vof/k esa izkFkhZx.k }kjk dk;Z ugh

fd;k x;k& ml le; ds eLVj jksy gksuk laHko ugha gSA izkFkhZx.k pawfd fu;fer deZpkjh ds :i esa fu;qDr ugha Fks&

blfy, is&fcy jftLVj esa mudk uke vafdr ugha gSA xsV&jftLVj fu;ekuqlkj ,d o"kZ ds fy, j[kk tkrk gS

mlds Ik'pkr u"V dj fn;k tkrk gS&ftldk i`Fkd ls vfHkys[k j[kk tkuk fu;e ds vuqlkj visf{kr ugha gSA

blfy, izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk ds dksbZ vk/kkj fo|eku ugha gSA

20-

foi{kh us l'kiFk dFku djrs gq, okafNr izys[kksa ds laca/k esa ;g dgk gS%

1- xsV&jftLVj 11 ls 14 o"kZ iqjkus gSa& tks ek= 1 o"kZ rd gh lqjf{kr j[ks tkrs gS blfy, izLrqr

ugha fd;s x;sA

2- osru okmplZ izkFkhZx.k ds laca/k esa la/kkfjr gh ugha fd;s x;s D;ksafd os fu;fer vk/kkj ij fu;qDr

ugha FksA Hkqxrku laca/kh izfof"V eLVj jksy ij dh xbZ gS& tks izLrqr fd;s x;s gaSA

3- cSad LVSVesaV izLrqr dj fn;s gSA

4- dk;Z vkoaVu jftLVj& izkFkhZx.k ds fu;fer vk/kkj ij fu;qDr u gksus rFkk izkFkhZx.k dks dksbZ

fof'k"V dk;Z u fn;s tkus ds dkj.k ;g jftLVj la/kkfjr ugha fd;s x;s& izkFkhZx.k dh lsok]

fufonk izLrqr djus ds vk/kkj ij yh xbZ& blfy, izLrqr ugha gq, gSA

5- deZpkfj;ks dh lwph dsoy fu;fer deZpkfj;kas dh j[kh tkrh gS& izkFkhZx.k ds fu;fer deZpkjh u

gksus ls& la/kkfjr ugha dh xbZ o izLrqr ugha gqbZA

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

471

6- Ø; iaftdk dh] mifLFkfr@Hkqxrku ls lqlaxrrk u gksus ls izLrqr ugha fd;k x;k Fkk fdarq

izfrijh{kk esa izkFkhZ ds vkxzg ij izn'kZ MCY;w&17 ds :Ik esa iznf'kZr gqvk gSA foi{kh }kjk izn'kZ

vkj&7 ls vkj&11 rd eLVj jksy izLrqr fd;s x;s gS tks & izkFkhZ dh mifLFkfr ls lacaf/kr gSaA

bu eLVj jksy ds vfrfjDr foi{kh us izn'kZ vkj&5 o vkj&6 mifLFkfr i=d Hkh lk{; esa izLrqr

fd;s gS&ftuesa of.kZr mifLFkfr fooj.k izn'kZ W- 7] W- 10] W- 11] W- 12] W- 15] W- 16] ls

lekurk n'kkZrk gSA ;gh ugha izkFkhZ us vius izfrijh{kk esa izn'kZ vkj&5@3@ vuqyXud&3 esa

of.kZr fooj.k dks Lo;a ls lacaf/kr fooj.k gksuk] o lgh gksuk Lohdkj fd;k gSA

21-

izkFkhZ us vius lk{; esa ;g dgk gS fd mls dke djus dk iSlk pSd ls feyrk FkkA 06-02-2020 dks iqu%

fd;s x;s izfrijh{k.k esa mlus dgk gS fd izn'kZ vkj&7 ls vkj&11 rd eLVj jksy ds vk/kkj ij mls uxn Hkqxrku

gqvk gSA var esa ;g Hkh Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mlls ftrus fnu dke fy;k x;k& mldk Hkqxrku foi{kh us dj fn;k

gSA

22-

foi{kh lk{kh lfPpnkuaUn uk;d us ;|fi viuh izfrijh{kk esa dgk gS fd 2006 ds dksbZ eLVj jksy is'k ugha

fd;s gSaSA pSd ls Hkqxrku ds cSad LVsVesaV is'k fd;s gS tks izn'kZ vkj&13 gS fdarq izkFkhZ dks fd;s Hkqxrku dk mYys[k

blesa ugh gS D;ksafd 17-12-2006 ls cSad LVsVesaV is'k fd;k gSA fdarq cSad LVsVesaV o eLVj jksy iwjs izLrqr u gksus ij

Hkh izn'kZ vkj&5 o vkj&6 esa of.kZr mifLFkfr fooj.k dks izkFkhZx.k }kjk lgh gksuk Lohdkj dj ysus ds dkj.k foi{kh

dh ln~HkkfoDrk ij izfrdwy izHkko ugha iM+rk gSaA ;g mi/kkfjr djuk mfpr ugha gS fd foi{kh us izkFkhZx.k dh

okLrfod mifLFkfr dks Nqikus ds mn~s'; ls dksbZ izys[k izLrqr ugha fd;s gksaA D;ksafd izkFkhZx.k dh mifLFkfr laca/kh

fooj.k ftls izkFkhZ us lgh ekuk gS& vfHkys[k ij miyC/k gSaA

23-

vc izkFkhZ }kjk vius izfrijh{kk esa fd;s x;s dqN egRoiw.kZ dFkuksa ij Hkh blh lanHkZ esa fopkj djuk lqlaxr

gSA

izkFkhZ dgrk gS fd mls dksbZ fu;qfDr i= ugha feykA og Bsds dk vFkZ le>rk gSaSA ch- ,- ikl gSA izn'kZ

MCY;w& 3 dks izkFkhZ us Lo;a ds QksVks o gLrk{kj ;qDr gksuk Lohdkj fd;k gSA og ;g Hkh Lohdkj djrk gS fd mlus

izn'kZ MCY;w& 3 ds ek/;e ls Bsds ij dk;Z djus ds fy, vkosnu izLrqr fd;k gS& mlus o"kZ 2007 esa Hkh Bsds ij

dk;Z djus ds fy, vkosnu fd;k FkkA Bsds ij dk;Z djus ds fy, lHkh ls ¼izkFkhZx.k ls½ vyx& vyx gLrk{kj

djok;s tkrs Fks& tks dke djrs Fks& mldk iSlk fey tkrk FkkA izkFkhZ ds bu dFkuks dks izn'kZ vkj&4 o vkj&5

vkns'k ls iqf"V feyrh gS ftlesa izkFkhZ dks DoksVs'kuksa ds vk/kkj ij nks ekg dh vof/k gsrq 6000@& #- esa dk;Z

djokus dh Lohd`fr tkjh dh xbZ gSA ;g Lohd`fr izkFkhZ ds izkFkZuki= izn'kZ vkj&3 ds vk/kkj ij gS ftlesa izkFkhZ us

dke Bsds ij 6000@& #- esa djus dh lgefr nh o ifjopu fd;k gSA

24-

izkFkhZ ds i{k esa izn'kZ W- 5 }kjk vDrwoj 2006 esa fd;s x;s Bsds ds dk;Z gsrq 1550@& #- Lohd`r fd;s

tkus dk mYys[k gSA blls ;g vkHkkl feyrk gS fd izn'kZ R- 5@1 ls izn'kZ R- 6@5 rd Lohd`r mifLFkfr fooj.k

esa ftl vof/k esa izkFkhZx.k dks dk;Zjr ugha gksuk n'kkZ;k x;k gS& ml vof/k esas izkFkhZx.k us Bsds ij O;fDrxr :Ik ls

le;c} o mn~s'; iwfrZ rd fuf'pr /kujkf'k ij dk;Z fd;k gSA

25-

lk{; dh bl fLFkfr rFkk izkFkhZi{k dh LohdkjksfDr ds vfLrRo esa izkFkhZx.k dh foi{kh }kjk fdlh in ij

fu;qfDr fd;k tkuk izekf.kr ugha gksrk& oju ;g izekf.kr gksrk gS fd izkFkhZx.k us foi{kh ds fy, uewuksa ds inkFkZ dh

dVkbZ] filkbZ] lQkbZ] iSfdax] vkfn dk;Z dks Bsds ij djus ds fy, fuf'pr dk;Z laiknu] fuf'pr vof/k esa]& fu;r

/kujkf'k gsrq djus dh lgefr o Lohd`fr nh gSA Bsds ij dk;Z laiknu ds mijkar tuojh 2007 ls vizsy 2008 dh

vof/k esa izkFkhZx.k us fofHkUu efguksa esa izn'kZ R- 5 o R- 6 esa fn;s x;s fooj.k ds vuq:Ik mifLFkr jgdj dk;Z Hkh

fd;kA lk{; ds bl foospu ls vizkFkhZ o izkFkhZx.k ds e/; fu;kstd o deZdkj dk laca/k LFkkfir gksuk izekf.kr ugha

gksrk gSA

26-

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls fu.kZ; fd'ku flag cuke ,Dth- bathfu;j esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g vf/ker fn;k

gS fd tc nSfud osru Hkksxh dks fu;fer in ds fo:} fu;qDr fd;k gks& rks lsok lekfIr ds iwoZ vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk

25 ¼,Q½s ds izko/kkuksa dk vuqikyu vko';d gSa

27-

Mk;jsDVj fQ'kjht VfeZuy fMohtu cuke Hkhdw HkkbZ es?kkth HkkbZ pkoM+k ds fu.kZ; esa eku- mPpre

U;k;ky; us ;g ekxZn'kZu fn;k gS fd /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½s vf/kfu;e ds lanHkZ esa 240 fnu dh yxkrkj lsok izekf.kr djus

gsrq ,d nSfud osru Hkksxh ls leLr mifLFkfr vfHkys[k izLrqr djus dh vis{kk mfpr ugha gSA deZdkj us tc ;g

nkok fd;k gks fd mlus 240 fnu dk;Z fd;k gS rks& fu;kstd ij ;g flf}Hkkj varfjr gks tkrk gS fd og deZdkj

}kjk 240 fnu lsok iw.kZ u djuk izekf.kr djsA

28-

gLrxr izdj.kksa esa izkFkhZx.k }kjk Bsds ij dk;Z djuk o foi{kh }kjk izLrqr mifLFkfr fooj.k dks Lohdkj

dj ysus dh fLFkfr esa bu fu.kZ;ksa esa izfrikfnr fof/k rF;kRed fHkUurk ds dkj.k izkFkhZx.k ds izfr lgk;d ugha gSA

29-

vkj- ,e- ;sykrh cuke vfl- ,DthD;wfVo bathfu;j ds fu.kZ; esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g izfrikfnr

fd;k gS fd 240 fnu lrr lsok djus ds rF; dks izekf.kr djus dk izkFkfed flf}Hkkj oknh@ izkFkhZ ij gh gS& ;g

nkf;Ro oknh }kjk Lohdk;Z lk{; ¼ekSf[kd o izys[kh;½ izLrqr djds mUeksfpr fd;k tkrk gSA nSfud osru Hkksxh

472 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 27, 2021/PHALGUNA 8, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Jfed ;fn fu;kstd ls mifLFkfr o osru Hkqxrku dk vfHkys[k izLrqr djokus dk fuosnu djsa& vkSj fu;kstd izLrqr

u djs& rks fu;kstd ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk djus dk fofu'p; izR;sd ekeys ds rF;ksa ij fuHkZj gksxkA gLrxr

izdj.kksa dh mi;qZDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds izdk'k esa foi{kh ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk fd;s tkus dk dksbZ vk/kkj fo|eku

ugha gSA rFkk ;g fu.kZ;t fof/k izkFkhZ ds i{k esa lgk;d ugha gSA

30-

fizalhiy Mwaxj dkWayst chdkusj cuke vkseizdk'k esa eku- jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us dgk gS fd deZdkj

tc 240 fnu dh yxkrkj lsok ,d dsys.Mj o"kZ esa iwoZ djus dk nkok djsa ,oa fu;kstd us bl rF; dk okXNy&

iw.kZ [kaMu fd;k gks& rks mls fu;kstd dh Lohd`fr le>k tkosaA

31-

ch- Mh- vks- izkxiqj cuke ;ksfxaUnj dqekj o vU; esa eku- fgekpy izns'k mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fof/k Hkh

rF;kRed fHkUurk ds dkj.k izkFkhZx.k ds izfr lgk;d ugha gSA

32-

blds foijhr foi{kh dh vksj ls ,e- ih- bysfDVªflVh cksMZ cuke gfjjke o lqjsUnz uxj fMfLVªDV iapk;r

cuke Mk;k HkkbZ vejflag ds ekeysa esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vf/ker dk voyEc fy;k x;k gSA bl

fu.kZ; esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd lsok lekfIr ds iwoZorhZ ,d dsys.Mj o"kZ esa 240 fnu

yxkrkj dk;Z djus ds rF; dk flf}Hkkj deZdkj ij gh gSA tc deZdkj bl rF; dks izekf.kr djus gsrq dksbZ lk{;

izLrqr u djs rFkk fu;kstd }kjk eLVj jksy izLrqr djus ij mudk [ka.Mu Hkh u djs& rks ;g dgk tkuk pkfg;s fd

deZdkj us flf}Hkkj dk mUekspu ugha fd;k gSA U;k;ky; dks fu;kstd ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk rc gh djuk

pkfg;s tc okafNr lk{; dk vfLrRo esa gksuk deZdkj izekf.kr djs] ftls izLrqr fd;k tk ldrk gksA Je U;k;ky;

ds le{k tkWp dk ifj{ks= lsok lekfIr ds iwoZorhZ 12 eghuksa rd gh lhfer gS& blh vof/k dks ijhf{kr dj og

fu/kkZfjr djsxk fd deZdkj dks vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ dk laj{k.k ns; gS vFkok ughaA bu fu.kZ;ksa esa ikfjr fof/k

ls ;g Li"V ekxZn'kZu izkIr gksrk gS fd izkFkhZx.k }kjk xsV jftLVj ds izLrqrhdj.k dh ekWx djus ij mlds u"V gks

tkus dk l'kiFk dFku vizkFkhZ }kjk fd;k x;k gS] blfy, ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk gS fd vizkFkhZ us fdlh izys[k ds

vfLrRo esa gksrs gq, Hkh tkuow> dj] izyf{kr mn~s'; ls mls izLrqr ugha fd;k gksA blds vfrfjDr ;g Hkh egRoiw.kZ gS

fd vizkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr mifLFkfr& fooj.k izn'kZ vkj& 5@1 ls vkj& 6@5 o eLVj jksy izn'kZ vkj& 7 ls vkj&

11 rd dks izkFkhZx.k us Lohdkj djrs gq, fo[kafMr ugha fd;k gSA blfy, vizkFkhZ ds fo:} izfrdwy mi/kkj.kk fd;k

tkuk U;k;ksfpr o fof/klEer ugha gSA

33-

foi{kh us ,e- ih- bysfDVªflVh cksMZ cuke gfjjke ds fu.kZ; esa eku- mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fof/k dk

voyac ysdj ;g Hkh dgk gS fd izkFkhZx.k dk dk;Z vLFkkbZ o vko';drk tfur Fkk& ftls vko';drk u gksus ij

can Hkh fd;k x;k FkkA bl rF; dh iqf"V lk{kh fouksn dqekj lh- ds- ds dFkuksa ls gqbZ gSaA bl fu.kZ; esa eku-

mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g ekxZn'kZu fn;k gS fd lhfer dk;Z ds fy, LFkkuh; O;fDr;ksa dks fn;k x;k fu;kstu& lrr

o fu;fer dk;Z gsrq ugha le>k tk ldrk gSA tc eLVj jksy ls Hkh ;g izdV gks fd fu;fer varjky ij Jfed ls

dk;Z fy;k x;k gS] ;g izekf.kr ugha gksrk gS fd fu;kstd dks ml dk;Z dh lrr vko';drk jgh gksA vizkFkhZ }kjk

izLrqr mifLFkfr fooj.k o eLVj jksy ds voyksdu ls Hkh izkFkhZx.k ls djok;k x;k dk;Z lrr izd`fr dk izekf.kr

ugha gqvk gS& D;ksafd mifLFkfr fooj.k esa izR;sd ekg esa fy;k x;k dk;Z] varjky lfgr gSA

34-

izkFkhZx.k dk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k ls Bsdk& Jfed ds :Ik esa dk;Z ;fn fy;k x;k gS rks vizkFkhZ ds

ikl mDr mn~s'; gsrq vuqKki= gksuk vko';d Fkk& ftldk u gksuk vizkFkhZ us Lohdkj fd;k gS& blfy, izkFkhZx.k

dks vizkFkhZ }kjk fu;qDr gh ekuk tkosaA foi{kh us bl laca/k esa fdlh vuqKki= dh vko';drk u gksuk dg dj rdZ

dk fojks/k fd;k gSA rdZ ij fopkj fd;k x;kA

35-

Bsdk Jfed ¼fofu;eu ,oa mUewyu½ vf/kfu;e 1970 dh /kkjk 1 ds vUrZxr vf/kfu;e ds izko/kkuksa ds

foLrkj dk mica/k fd;k x;k gSA bl vf/kfu;e dh mi/kkjk 1 ¼4½ (a) ds vuqlkj izR;sd ,slk LFkkiu@laLFkku tgkW

chl ;k mlls vf/kd deZdkj fu;ksftr gksa ;k foxr ckjg eghuksa ds nkSjku fdlh fnu fu;ksftr jgs gks& ij gh

vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku iz;ksT; gksxsaA bu izdj.kksa esa izkFkhZx.k us ,slh dksbZ lk{; izLrqr ugha dh gS ftlls vizkFkhZ ds

v/khu chl ;k mlls vf/kd deZdkjksa dk fu;ksftr gksuk izekf.kr gksrk gksA blfy, izkFkhZx.k dk ;g rdZ lkjoku

ugha gSA

36-

mi;ZqDr foospu ls ;g Li"V :Ik ls izekf.kr gS fd izkFkhZx.k lsok lekfIr dh frfFk 29-04-2008 ls iwoZorhZ

,d dsys.Mj o"kZ dh vof/k esa vizkFkhZ ds fu;kstu esa 240 fnu yxkrkj dk;Z djus dk rF; izekf.kr djus esa foQy

jgs gSa& blfy, vizkFkhZ }kjk izkFkhZx.k dh NVuh 30-04-2008 ls fd;k tkuk Hkh Lo;a gh izekf.kr ugha gksrk gSA

ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa ds varxZr fdlh izdkj dk laj{k.k izkIr djus ds

vf/kdkjh izekf.kr ugha gq, gSA vr% ;g fopkj.kh; fcanq izkFkhZx.k ds fo:} fu.khZr fd;k tkrk gSA

37-

foi{kh us ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mUgksaus izkFkhZx.k dks vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa ds varxZr

dksbZ uksfVl ugha fn;k u gh uksfVl osru o {kfriwfrZ dk Hkqxrku fd;k& D;ksafd uksfVl LFkkbZ deZpkfj;ksa dks fn;k

tkrk gS rFkk izkFkhZx.k Lo;a gh dke NksM+ dj pys tkrs FksA fcanq la- 2 ds fofu'p; ds izdk'k esa izkFkhZx.k dks pawfd

vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa dk laj{k.k izkIr ugha gqvk gS] blfy, bu izko/kkuks dh ikyuk fd;s tkus

dh ck/;rk vizkFkhZ dks ugha Fkh& vr% ;g fcanq izkFkhZx.k ds fo:} fu.khZr fd;k tkrk gSA

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : फरवरी 27, 2021/फाल् गुन 8, 1942

473

38-

bl fcanq ds laca/k esa izkFkhZ us vius dFku esa dgk gS fd vizkFkhZ }kjk dksbZ ofj"Brk lwph ugh cukbZ og tks

dk;Z djrk Fkk& mls vU; Jfeadks ls djok;k tk jgk gSA ;g mYys[kuh; gS fd izkFkhZ us vius vfHkopukas ;k lk{;

esa mu O;fDr;ksa dk uke Hkh of.kZr ugha fd;k gS ftUgsa izkFkhZ dks lsokeqDr djus ds mijkar dfu"B gksus ij Hkh lsok esa

j[kk x;k gksA

39-

foi{kh us vius lk{; esa dgk gS fd izkFkhZ ds dk;Z NksM+dj pys tkus ds okn mDr dk;Z dh lekfIr ij

fdlh vU; Jfed dks dk;Z ij ugha yxk;k x;k gS rFkk fdlh dfu"B Jfed dks fu;qfDr ugha nh xbZ gSA izfrijh{kk

esa ;g Hkh dgk gS fd orZeku esa Bsds ij tks Jfed dk;Zjr gS os ml dk;Z ls layXu ugha gS ftl ij izkFkhZ dk;Zjr

jgk gSA orZeku Jfedksa dh dk;Z dh izd`fr orZeku deZpkjh ls fHkUu gSaA

40-

izkFkhZ dh izfr ijh{kk esa mlus Lohdkj fd;k gS fd izn'kZ vkj& 12 lwph esa mldk uke ugha gS D;ksafd og

LFkkbZ deZpkfj;ksa dh lwph gSA foi{kh dk ;g Hkh lk{; gS fd pWwfd izkFkhZ fu;fer deZpkjh ugha Fkk blfy, is fcy

jftLVj esa mldk uke ugha gSA izkFkhZ dk uke rks eLVj jksy esa gh vafdr gksrk FkkA

41-

fcanq la- 2 ds fofu'p; ls ;g LFkkfir gks pqdk gS fd vizkFkhZ }kjk izkFkhZx.k dks fdlh LFkkbZ ;k fu;fer

in ij fu;qfDr ugha nh xbZ Fkh& oju izkFkhZx.k dks dk;Z dh vko';drk gsrq vLFkkbZ :Ik ls lafonk ds vk/kkj ij

fuf'pr jkf'k ds Hkqxrku ij j[kk FkkA ,sls Jfedksa dh dksbZ ofj"Brk lwph dk la/kkj.k fd;k tkuk foi{kh ds fy,

ck/;dkjh ugha gSA

42-

eku- mPpre U;k;ky; us lqjsUnz uxj fMfLVªDV iapk;r cuke Mk;k HkkbZ vejflag ds fu.kZ; esa leku rF;ksa

ij fopkj djrs gq, ;g dgk gS fd fu;fer fu;kstu ds vHkko esa ofj"Brk lwph dk la/kkj.k fu;kstd ls visf{kr ugha

Fkk& nSfud osru Hkksxh Jfedksa dh ofj"Brk lwph dk la/kkj.k fof/kd vis{kk ugha gSA bl foospu ds mijkar ;g fcanq

izkFkhZ ds fo:} fu.khZr fd;k tkrk gSA

fopkj.kh; fcanqvksa ij izkIr foosfpr fu"d"kZ ds vk/kkj ij vizkFkhZ laLFkku ;|fi m|ksx dh ifjHkk"kk ds

vUrxZr vkuk izekf.kr gqvk gS fdarq lk{; ds v/kkj ij vizkFkhZ }kjk izkFkhZx.k dh NVuh fd;k tkuk izekf.kr ugh

gqvk gS& blfy, vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa dk laj{k.k izkFkhZx.k dks miyC/k ugha gSA vizkFkhZ }kjk

izkFkhZ ls fdlh dfu"Brj O;fDr dks lsok esa j[kk tkuk fl) ugha gqvk gS&bl izdkj izkFkhZx.k vf/kfu;e ds varxZr

fdlh Hkh izko/kku dk laj{k.k ikus dks vf/kdkjoku izekf.kr ugha gq, gSA blfy, izkFkhZx.k vizkFkhZ ds fo:} dksbZ

vuqrks"k ikus ds vf/kdkjh ugha gSA

vr% izkFkhZx.k& vizkFkhZ laLFkku ds fo:} dksbZ vuqrks"k izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh ugha gSa& vf/kfu.kZ; blh

izdkj ikfjr fd;k tkrk gSA vf/kfu.kZ; dh izfr izR;sd vkS|ksfxd fookn i=koyh esa layXu dh tkos rFkk iapkV dh

izfrfyfi vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 dh /kkjk 17 ¼1½ ds vuqlj.k esa izdk'kukFkZ izsf"kr dh tkosaA

iapkV vkt fnukad 29 fnlEcj 2020 dks fy[kk o gLrk{kfjr fd;k x;kA

jk/kk eksgu prqosZnh] ihBklhu vf/kdkjh

Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054. SURENDER

MAHADASAM

Digitally signed by

SURENDER MAHADASAM

Date: 2021.03.08

16:56:45 +05'30'