1719 GI/2021
(761)
रजिस्ट्री सं. डी.एल. (एन) 04/0007/2003—05
REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05
xxxGIDHxxx
xxxGIDExxx
प्राजिकार से प्रकाजित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप् ताजिक
WEEKLY
सं. 13]
नई दिल् ली, मार्च 28—अप्रैल 3, 2021 िजनवार/ र्ैत्र 7—र्ैत्र 13, 1943
No. 13] NEW DELHI, MARCH 28– APRIL 3, 2021, SATURDAY/ CHAITRA 7 – CHAITRA 13, 1943
इस भाग में जभन् न ृष् सं् ा िी िाती िै जिससे दक ि ृष क संकलन के प ृ में र ा िा सके
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग II— ण् ड 3—उृ- ण् ड (ii)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)
भारत सरकार के मंत्राल ों (रक्षा मंत्राल को छोड़कर) द्वारा िारी दकए गए सांजवजिक आिेि और अजिसूर्नाएं
Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India
(Other than the Ministry of Defence)
कषजि एवं दकसान कल् ाण मंत्राल
(कषजि अनुसंिान एवं जिक्षा जवभाग)
नई दिल्ली, 31 मार्च, 2021
का.आ. 325.—केन्री सरकार, कषजि एवं दकसान कल् ाण मंत्राल , कषजि अनुसंिान एवं जिक्षा जवभाग,
रािभािा जन मावली 1976 के जन म 10 के उृजन म (4) के अनुसरण में (1) भा.कष.अ.ृ.- केन् री अंतस्ट् चली
माज्स्ट् की अनुसंिान संस्ट् ान, क्षेत्री केंर, िरनी रोड, वड़ोिरा, गुिरात और (2) भारती ृिु जर्दक् सा अनुसंिान,
क्षेत्री केन् र, मुक् तेश् वर, जिला नैनीताल, उ् तरा ंड को, जिसमें 80 प्रजतित से अजिक अजिकारर ों/कमचर्ारर ों ने
जिन् िी का का चसािक ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जल ा िै, एतिद्वारा अजिसूजर्त करता िै।
[फा. सं. 13-05/2020-हिंिी/182-12]
एस. के. उृाध् ा , अवर सजर्व
सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-09042021-226465
CG-DL-W-09042021-226465
762 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 3, 2021/CHAITRA 13, 1943
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FARMERS WELFARE
(Department of Agricultural Research and Education)
New Delhi, the 31st March, 2021
S.O. 325.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language Rules 1976, the Central
Government, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Department of Agricultural Research and Education
hereby notifies the (1) ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Regional Centre, Harni Road,
Vadodara, Gujarat and (2) ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Regional Centre, Mukteshwar, District
Nainital, Uttrakhand where more than 80% of staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.
[F. No. 13-05/2020-Hindi/182-12]
S. K. UPADHYAY, Under Secy.
िल िजि मंत्राल
(िल संसािन, निी जवकास और गंगा संरक्षण जवभाग)
नई दिल्ली, 23 मार्च, 2021
का.आ. 326.—केन्री सरकार, रािभािा (संघ के िासकी प्र ोिनों के जलए प्र ोग) जन म, 1976 ( ा
संिोजित 1987) के जन म 10 के उृजन म (4) के अनुसरण में केन् री िल आ ोग, दिल् ली त ा वाप् कोस जलजमटेड,
गुप ग्राम के जनम् नजलज त का ाचल ों को, जिनके 80% कमचर्ारी वषन्ि ने जिन्िी का का चसािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जल ा िै,
को एति् द्वारा अजिसूजर्त करती िै:-
केन् री िल आ ोग, दिल् ली
1. िल जवज्ञानी प्रेक्षण ृररमंडल, केन् री िल आ ोग, भुवनेश् वर
2. ृूवी नदि ां मंडल, केन् री िल आ ोग, भुवनेश् वर
3. जनर्ली कष् णा उृ मंडल-।।, केन् री िल आ ोग, जवि वाड़ा
4. मध् कष् णा, उृमंडल-।।, केन् री िल आ ोग, कनूचल,
5. जनर्ली तुंगभरा उृ मंडल, केन् री िल आ ोग, कनूचल
6. उृ मंडल अजभ ंता का ाचल , जनर्ली कष् णा उृ मंडल-।, नागािुचनसागर बांि., केन् री िल आ ोग,
तेलंगाना
7. उृ मंडल अजभ ंता का ाचल , जनर्ली गोिावरी उृ मंडल-।।, केन् री िल आ ोग, रािामुन् री
वाप् कोस जलजमटेड, गुप ग्राम
1. वाप् कोस जलजमटेड, िैिराबाि
2. वाप् कोस जलजमटेड, बेंगलुप
3. वाप् कोस जलजमटेड, कोलकाता
4. वाप् कोस जलजमटेड, अिमिाबाि
5. वाप् कोस जलजमटेड, गांिी नगर
6. वाप् कोस जलजमटेड, ृरर ोिना का ाचल , भुवनेश् वर
[फा. सं. ई-11011/1/2021-जिन्िी/1492-1592]
डॉ. आर. सतीि, आर् चक सलािकार एवं रािभािा प्रभारी
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 3, 2021/र्ैत्र 13, 1943
763
JAL SHAKTI MINISTRY
(Department of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvention)
New Delhi, the 23rd March, 2021
S.O. 326.—In Pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official
purposes of the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies the following
office of Central Water Commission, Delhi and WAPCOS Limited, Gurugram, wherein more than 80% staff
have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:
Central Water Commission, Delhi
1. Hydrological Obsevation Circle, Central Water Commission, Bhubaneswar
2. Eastern Rivers Division, Central Water Commission, Bhubaneswar
3. Lower Krishna Sub-Division-II, K.G.B.O, Central Water Commission, Vijayawada
4. Middle Krishna Sub-Division-II, Central Water Commission, Kurnool
5. Lower Tungabhadra Sub-Division-I, Central Water Commission, Kurnool
6. Sub Divisional Engineer Office Lower, Krishna Sub-Division-I, Kurnool K.G.B.O, Central Water
Commission, Miyalguda, Hyderabad
7. Sub Divisional Engineer Office, Lower Godavari Sub-Division-II, Central Water Commission,
Rajahmundry,
WAPCOS Limited, Gurugram
1. WAPCOS Limited, Hyderabad.
2. WAPCOS Limited, Bengaluru
3. WAPCOS Limited, Kolkata
4. WAPCOS Limited, Ahmadabad
5. WAPCOS Limited, Gandhi Nagar
6. WAPCOS Limited, Project Office, Bhubaneswar
[F. No. E.11011/1/2021-Hindi/1492-1592]
Dr. R. SATHISH, Economic Advisor & Official Language Incharge
श्रम और रोिगार मंत्राल
नई दिल्ली, 1 अप्रैल, 2021
का.आ. 327.—राष्ट्रृजत, श्री श् ाम सुंिर गगच, ृी ासीन अजिकारी, केन्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण
सि श्रम न् ा ाल , नागृुर को सौंृे गए केन्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण सि श्रम न् ा ाल , सं. 2, मुंबई के
ृी ासीन अजिकारी के अजतररि प्रभार की अवजि दिनांक 19.04.2021 से छ: माि तक अ वा ृि ृर जन जमत
जन ुजि तक अ वा अगले आिेिो तक, इनमें िो भी ृिले िो तक बढ़ाते िै ।
[सं. अ-11016/02/2019-सीएलएस-II]
सतीि र्न्िर, अवर सजर्व
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
New Delhi, the 1st April, 2021
S.O. 327.—The President is pleased to extend the additional charge of the post of Presiding Officer,
Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No.2, Mumbai entrusted to Shri Shyam Sunder
Garg, Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Nagpur for a further period
of six months with effect from 19.04.2021, or till the regular appointment to the post, or until further orders,
whichever is the earliest.
[No. A-11016/02/2019-CLS-II]
SATISH CHANDER, Under Secy.
764 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 3, 2021/CHAITRA 13, 1943
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 1 vizSy] 2021
—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
iatkc ,.M fla/k cSad ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 40@2007½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS
tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 01-04-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-12012@57@2006-vkbZ vkj ¼ch-II)]
lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 1st April, 2021
S.O. 328.— In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 40/2007) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Punjab & Sind
Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 01.04.2021.
[No. L-12012/57/2006-IR(B-II)]
SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/40/2007
Present: P. K. Srivastava, H.J.S..( Retd)
Shri Baijnath Shukla,
Village-Newariya,
42,Post-Pachera,
Via-Korav, District, Allahabad
…Workman
Versus
The Regional Manager,
Punjab & Sindh Bank,
3/114, Arera Colony,
Bhopal (M.P.)
… Management
AWARD
(Passed on this 12th day of March-2021)
1.
As per letter dated 5-6-2007 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the
reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section-10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per
Notification No.L-12012/57/2006-IR(B-II). The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action of the management of Punjab & sind Bank in terminating the services of
Shri Baijnath Shukla w.e.f. 4-8-1989 is legal and Justified?If not, to what relief the workman is
entitled ?.”
2.
After registering the case on the basis of reference, notices were sent to the parties. Both the parties
have filed their respective claim/defence.
3.
The case of the workman as stated in his statement of claim is that he was employed by the
Management Bank against the permanent post of peon lying vacant in Rewa Branch of the Bank on temporary
basis from 12/5/1987. He continuously rendered his services for more than 90 days , thereafter he was dis-
engaged under an oral order on 24-12-1987. Again he was engaged as a daily wager on 1-10-1988 for the said
post. He was doing the job of a waterman-cum-peon. He was assured that he will be absorbed permanently, as
a peon. He continuously worked till 3-8-1989 when his services were disengaged under an oral order of the
Management. He had worked for more than 240 days continuously in the year preceding the date of his dis-
engagement. He was dis-engaged without any notice or compensation. It is, further the case of the workman
that he made a representation on 20-9-1988. There was a Scheme by Management Bank which allowed the
workman who had worked in any capacity for more than 90 days in a calendar year to be absorbed after
following the formalities mentioned in the scheme. He did apply in that Scheme also but was not absorbed. He
raised a dispute which could not result in conciliation , hence reference was made to this Tribunal by the
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 3, 2021/र्ैत्र 13, 1943
765
appropriate Government. According to the workman, his dis-engagement was violative of Section 25(F), 25(G)
and Section 25(H) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, hereinafter referred to as the word ‘Act”. Thus the
workman has prayed for his reinstatement with all back wages, setting aside his dis-engagement.
4.
The case of the Management Bank is that the applicant formally never applied for any job under the
Bank. No appointment letter was issued to him. No Rules or procedure was followed in his recruitment. In
fact, he was engaged on daily basis as a casual labour in the Branch for some hours in a day as a Water-Man
purely on the basis of need. He was free not to come next day. He was engaged only for the working days and
no wages for holidays was paid to him. Under the Policy of the Bank, he was dis-engaged. His dis-engagement
is not covered in Industrial Disputes Act,1947. He did get a chance to be absorbed under the Bank Scheme but
could not succeed. He never worked continuously for 240 days at any time in the year, preceding the date of
his dis-engagement.
5.
In his rejoinder, the workman has mainly reiterated his claim.
6.
The workman has filed documents, experience certificate by Bank dated 25-1-1993, letter of Bank
dated 30-12-1992, details of date wise payment, reply of bank filed before the Conciliation Officer and has
proved it as Exhibit W-1 to Exhibit W-4 respectively. The workman has examined himself on oath. He has
further filed and proved applications filed in Bank which are Exhibits W-5, W-6 and W-7. The Management
has examined its witness Vishram Kashyap, Senior Manager.
7.
At the stage of arguments, none appeared. Parties were granted liberty to file written arguments. The
workman did file written arguments. No written arguments was filed by the Management Bank.
8.
In his written arguments also the workman has mainly reiterated his case.
9.
I have gone through the records as well.
10.
Before proceeding into the merits of the case, some legal and relevant provisions as Section 2(oo),
Section 25(B), Section 25(F), Section (G), Section 25(H) of the Industrial Disputes Act,1947 ,requires to be
reproduced here:-
2[(oo) “retrenchment” means the termination by the employer of the service of a workman for
any any reason whatsoever, otherwise than as a punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary
action, but does not include— (a) voluntary retirement of the workman; or (b) retirement of the
workman on reaching the age of superannuation if the contract of employment between the
employer and the workman concerned contains a stipulation in that behalf;
Section 25 B:-
Definition of continuous service.-
(1) a workman shall be said to be in continuous service for a period if he is, for that period, in
uninterrupted service, including service which may be interrupted on account of sickness or
authorised leave or an accident or a strike which is not illegal, or a lock-out or a cessation of
work which is not due to any fault on the part of the workman; (2) where a workman is not in
continuous service within the meaning of clause (1) for a period of one year or six months, he
shall be deemed to be in continuous service under an employer- (a) for a period of one year, if the
workman, during a period of twelve calendar months preceding the date with reference to which
calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the employer for not less than- (i) one
hundred and ninety days in the case of a workman employed below ground in a mine; and (ii)
two hundred and forty days, in any other case; (b) for a period of six months, if the workman,
during a period of six calendar months preceding the date with reference to which calculation is
to be made, has actually worked under the employer for not less than- (i) ninety-five days, in the
case of a workman employed below ground in a mine; and (ii) one hundred and twenty days, in
any other case.
25F. Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen.- No workman employed in any industry
who has been in continuous service for not less than one year under an employer shall be
retrenched by that employer until- (a) the workman has been given one month's notice in
writing indicating the reasons for retrenchment and the period of notice has expired, or the
workman has been paid in lieu of such notice, wages for the period of the notice: 1[***] (b) the
workman has been paid, at the time of retrenchment, compensation which shall be equivalent to
fifteen days' average pay 2[for every completed year of continuous service] or any part thereof in
excess of six months; and (c) notice in the prescribed manner is served on the appropriate
766 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 3, 2021/CHAITRA 13, 1943
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Government 3[or such authority as may be specified by the appropriate Government by
notification in the Official Gazette.]
25G. Procedure for retrenchment.- Where any workman in an industrial establishment, who is a
citizen of India, is to be retrenched and he belongs to a particular category of workmen in that
establishment, in the absence of any agreement between the employer and the workman in this
behalf, the employer shall ordinarily retrench the workman who was the last person to be
employed in that category, unless for reasons to be recorded the employer retrenches any other
workman.
25H. Re-employment of retrenched workmen.- Where any workmen are retrenched and the
employer proposes to take into his employ any persons, he shall, in such manner as may be
prescribed, give an opportunity 2[to the retrenched workmen who are citizens of India to offer
themselves for re-employment, and such retrenched workmen] who offer themselves for re-
employment shall have preference over other persons.
11.
Admitted between the parties is the fact that the workman was engaged by Management for the period
as stated above in this Award. Hence in the light of legal provisions mentioned above, he has successfully
completed 240 days of engagement in the year preceding the date of his dis-engagement. It is also admitted that
no notice or compensation was granted to him at the time of disengagement. The case of Management is that
the workman was a daily wager on casual basis but it make no difference in the light of Section 2(oo) of the
Industrial Disputes Act,1947. Accordingly his disengagement his retrenchment in the eyes of law and since
Provisions of Section 25 were not observed, it is violative of Section 25(G) of the Act and is held so.
12.
Now that the disengagement of the workman has been found violative of law, the question arises is to
what relief he deserves to be granted. Since the workman was not recruited under a procedure ,against any
permanent or temporary vacancy, rather he was engaged as a casual labour, daily wager, according to local
needs of the Bank , his recruitment will not be a proper relief. Thus he is held entitled to compensation.
Keeping in view the tenure of his dis-engagement, the amount of compensation in the case in hand is quantified
at Rs. 50,000/-(Rupees fifty thousand only).
13.
Before parting, it will be proper to mention here that the workman has put his case that he was not
considered for absorption in the light of circular inspite of his application and the fact that he had spent more
than 90 days in the engagement of Bank, this point has not been considered by me because the reference is
limited to the point of dis-engagement of the workman and thus the Tribunal cannot travel beyond the reference.
14.
On the basis of the above discussion, following award is passed:-
“A. The action of the management of Punjab & Sindh Bank in terminating the services of
Shri Baijnath Shukla w.e.f. 4-8-1989 is against law and is not justified in law.
B.
The workman is held entitled to compensation of Rs. 50,000/-(Rupees fifty thousand only)
to be paid within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of the Award by Management,
failing which interest at bank rate.”
15.
Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as
per rules.
DATE: 12.3.2021
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 1 vizSy] 2021
.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
iatkc us'kuy cSad ds izca/kra=] lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; la- 2] ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 23@2009½ dks izdkf'kr
djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 01-04-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-12012@94@2008-vkbZ vkj (ch-II)]
lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 3, 2021/र्ैत्र 13, 1943
767
New Delhi, the 1st April, 2021
S.O. 329.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 23/2009) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court No. 2, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Punjab
National Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 01.04.2021.
[No. L-12012/94/2008-IR(B-II)]
SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II, NEW DELHI
Present: Smt. Pranita Mohanty, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-Cum-Labour
Court-II, New Delhi.
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 23/2009
Date of Passing Award- 1st March, 2021
Between:
Shri Bhavish Kumar Kalra,
196, 2nd Floor, Old Gupta colony,
New Vijay Nagar,
Delhi-110009.
… Claimant
Versus
The General Manager
Punjab National Bank
7, Bhikaji Cama Place,
New Delhi- 110066.
… Management
Appearances:-
None for the claimant (A/R)
: For the claimant
Shri Rajat Arora (A/R)
: For the Management
AWARD
The Government of India in Ministry of Labour & Employment has referred the present dispute
existing between employer i.e. the management of M/s Punjab National Bank, and its workman/claimant herein,
under clause (d) of sub section (1)and sub section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act 1947 vide
letter No. L-12012/94/2008 (IR(B-II) dated 03/03/2009 to this tribunal for adjudication to the following effect.
“Whether the action of the management of Punjab National Bank i.e. Dy. Zonal Manager, Zonal
Office, North Delhi, New Delhi in dismissing the workman Shri B.K. Kalra, ex-special Assistant from
service without notice, is just, fair and legal? What relief the concerned workmen is entitled to?”
This is a reference received from the Appropriate Government to adjudicate whether the action of the
management of PNB in dismissing the workman B.K Kalra ex special assistant from service without notice is
just fair and legal. To what relief the concerned workman is entitled to.
The claimant filed a claim statement stating therein that he was working with the management Bank as
a Special Assistant. On 09.03.1998 he was placed under suspension and at that time he was posted as a special
assistant at branch office Shashtri Nagar New Delhi. Thereafter charge sheet was issued and inquiry was
initiated. The departmental inquiry was conducted ignoring the Principles of Natural Justice and at the end of
the inquiry he was found guilty of charges i.e. his indulgence in speculated transaction and share business. On
the basis of the inquiry report the disciplinary authority passed an order dismissing him from service. Though
appeal was filed the same was rejected too.
The claimant raised a dispute before the Labour Commissioner where the conciliation proceeding was
initiated. The conciliation since, failed the appropriate government referred the matter for adjudication.
Notice being served the management Bank appeared and filed written statement denying the allegation
made by the claimant. While filing the proceeding of the domestic inquiry and the orders passed therein the
768 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 3, 2021/CHAITRA 13, 1943
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
management stated that the claimant was guilty of misconduct and the inquiry was conducted in a proper
manner. The charges where proved and the punishment imposed is a proportionate to the charge.
On the rival pleadings three issues were framed by order dated 19.11.2010 and it was ordered that the
issue no.1 seems involves the question of fairness of the inquiry shall be heard as a preliminary issue
accordingly parties were called upon to adduce evidence. The claimant examined himself as WW1 and placed
certain document on record. The management examined one of its manager as MW1 and the matter was fixed
for argument. At this juncture the Ld. A/R for the claimant filed a petition stating therein that the claimant died
during the pendency of the proceeding and his LRs need to be substituted. He also took time to file the
substitution petition. Several adjournments were allowed to the proceeding for substitution of the LRs for the
claimant. But the Ld. A/R did not filed any substitution application.
Perusal of the record shows that 3 separate notices in 3 available addresses were sent giving
opportunity to the LRs of the claimant to substitute themselves in the proceeding. But all the notices return un-
served with a report that the addressee had left the place. Thus, all the efforts for the substitution of the legal
Heirs of the claimant failed.
It is the principle of law no judicial order/award can be passed against a dead person. Hence the claim
petition is liable to be dismissed and a no dispute award is required to be passed. Hence, ordered.
ORDER
The claim petition be and the same is dismissed for non prosecution and a no dispute award is hereby
pass. Send a copy of this award to the appropriate government for notification as required under section 17 of
the ID act 1947.
The reference is accordingly answered.
Dictated & Corrected by me.
1st March, 2021
PRANITA MOHANTY, Presiding Officer
Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064
and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054. SURENDER
MAHADASAM
Digitally signed by SURENDER
MAHADASAM
Date: 2021.04.09 16:21:45 +05'30'