5935 GI/2022

(1667)

रिज᭭ᮝी सं. डी.एल. (एन) 04/0007/2003—05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

xxxGIDHxxx

xxxGIDExxx

ᮧािधकार से ᮧकािशत

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

सा᭡ तािहक

WEEKLY

सं. 37]

नई ᳰद᭨ ली, िसत᭥ बर 11— िसत᭥ बर 17, 2022, शिनवार/ भाᮤ 20— भाᮤ 26, 1944

No. 37] NEW DELHI, SEPTEMBER 11—SEPTEMBER 17, 2022, SATURDAY/BHADRA 20–BHADRA 26, 1944

इस भाग मᱶ िभ᭠ न पृ᭬ ठ सं᭎ या दी जाती है िजससे ᳰक यह पृथक संकलन के ᱨप मᱶ रखा जा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II—ख᭛ ड 3—उप-ख᭛ ड (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंᮢालयᲂ (रᭃा मंᮢालय को छोड़कर) ᳇ारा जारी ᳰकए गए सांिविधक आदेश और अिधसूचनाएं

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

िवᱫ मंᮢालय

(िवᱫीय सेवाएं िवभाग)

नई ᳰद᭨ली, 13 िसत᭥ बर, 2022

का.आ. 797.—बीमा िविनयामक और िवकास ᮧािधकरण अिधिनयम, 1999 (1999 का 41) कᳱ धारा 4 ᳇ारा

ᮧदᱫ शिᲦयᲂ का ᮧयोग करते ᱟए, के᭠ᮤीय सरकार, एत᳏ारा, ᮰ी थॉमस एम. देवािसया, तकनीकᳱ िवशेष᭄-वृहत जोिखम

(ऊजाᭅ और अवसंरचना-तटीय और अपतटीय) माशᭅ इं᭫योरᱶस ᮩोकसᭅ इंिडया, कोिᲬ, केरल को पद का कायᭅभार ᮕहण करने

कᳱ तारीख से बासठ वषᭅ कᳱ आयु ᮧा᳙ करने तक अथवा अगले आदेशᲂ तक, जो भी पहले हो, चार लाख ᱧपए ᮧितमाह

(आवास और कार कᳱ सुिवधा के िबना) के समेᳰकत वेतन पैकेज पर भारतीय बीमा िविनयामक और िवकास ᮧािधकरण मᱶ

पूणᭅकािलक सद᭭य (गैर-जीवन) के पद पर िनयुᲦ करती है।

[फा. सं. आर-16011/01/2021-बीमा-I]

सुरजीत काᳶतᭅकेयन, उप सिचव

सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-03102022-239317

CG-DL-W-03102022-239317

1668

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPETEMBER 17, 2022/BHADRA 26, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Financial Services)

New Delhi, the 13th September, 2022

S.O. 797.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 4 of the Insurance Regulatory and Development

Authority Act, 1999 (41 of 1999), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Thomas M. Devasia, Technical

Expert-Large Risks [Energy & Infrastructure -On-Shore & Off-Shore], Marsh Insurance Brokers India, Kochi, Kerala

as Whole-time Member (Non-Life) in the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India, on a

consolidated pay package of four lakh rupees per month (without facility of house and car), with effect from the date

of assumption of charge of the post till attaining the age of sixty-two years, or until further orders, whichever is

earlier.

[F. No. R-16011/01/2021-Ins.I]

SURJITH KARTHIKEYAN, Dy. Secy.

िवदेश म᭠ᮢालय

(सी.पी.वी. ᮧभाग)

ubZ fnYyh] 6 flrEcj] 2022

—राजनियक और कᲂसुलीय अिधकारी (शपथ एवं फᳱस) के अिधिनयम, 1948 कᳱ धारा 2 के खंड

(क) के अनुसरण मᱶ वैधािनक आदेश ।

एत᳏ारा, कᱶᮤ सरकार भारत के ᮧधान कᲂसलावास, जे᳎ाह मᱶ ᮰ी हषᭅ वधᭅन स᭜य ᮧकाश, वᳯर᳧ सिचवालय सहायक को

ᳰदनांक 06 िसत᭥बर,

202

से सहायक कᲂसुलर अिधकारी के तौर पर कᲂसुलर सेवाᲐ के िनवᭅहन के िलए ᮧािधकृत करती

है।

[फा. सं. टी-4330/01/2022(34)]

एस. आर.एच. फहमी] उप सिचव (कांसुलर)

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

(CPV Division)

New Delhi, the 6th September, 2022

S.O. 798.—Statutory Order in pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular

Officers (Oaths and fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Harsha Wardhan

Satya Prakash, Senior Secretariat Assistant as Assistant Consular Officer in Consulate General of India, Jeddah to

perform the Consular services with effect from September 6, 2022.

[F. No. T-4330/01/2022(34)]

S.R.H FAHMI Dy. Secy. (Consular)

िव᳒ुत मंᮢालय

नई ᳰद᭨ली, 7 िसत᭥बर, 2022

—कᱶᮤीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकᳱय ᮧयोजनᲂ के िलए ᮧयोग) िनयम, 1976 के

िनयम 10 के उप िनयम (4) के अनुसरण मᱶ िव᳒ुत मंᮢालय के ᮧशासिनक िनयंᮢणाधीन पावर िᮕड कापᲃरेशन ऑफ इंिडया

िलिमटेड के िन᳜िलिखत कायाᭅलयᲂ, िजनके 80 ᮧितशत कमᭅचारीवृंद ने ᳲहंदी का कायᭅसाधक ᭄ान ᮧा᳙ कर िलया है, को

एतद᳇ारा अिधसूिचत करती है:

पावर िᮕड कापᲃरेशन ऑफ इंिडया िलिमटेड,

[भाग II—ख᭛ ड 3(ii)]

भारत का राजपᮢ : िसत᭥ बर 17, 2022/भाᮤ 26, 1944

1669

220 केवी दालकोला उपकᱶᮤ,

दालकोला, िजला-उᱫर ᳰदनाजपुर,

पि᳟म बंगाल-733201

पावर िᮕड कापᲃरेशन ऑफ इंिडया िलिमटेड,

220/132 केवी बीरपाड़ा उपकᱶᮤ,

मदारी रोड, पो.- बीरपाड़ा,

िजला- जलपाईगुड़ी,

पि᳟म बंगाल-735204

[फा. सं. 11011/05/9/2022-ᳲहंदी]

िवशाल कपूर, संयुᲦ सिचव (रा.भा.)

MINISTRY OF POWER

New Delhi, the 7th September, 2022

S.O. 799.—In pursuance of Sub Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of

the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notify the following offices of Power Grid Corporation of

India Limited under the administrative control of Ministry of Power, where 80% of the staff have acquired working

knowledge of Hindi:

Power Grid Corporation of India Limited,

220KV Dalkhola Substation,

Dalkhola, Dist- Uttar Dinajpur,

West Bengal-733201

Power Grid Corporation of India Limited,

220/132 KV Birpara S/S, Madari Road,

PO-Birpara, Dist.-Jalpaiguri,

West Bengal- 735204

[F. No. 11011/05/9/2022-Hindi]

VISHAL KAPOOR, Jt. Secy. (O.L.)

कोयला मंᮢालय

नई ᳰद᭨ली, 14 िसत᭥बर, 2022

का.आ. 800.— के᭠ᮤीय सरकार, कोयला धारक ᭃेᮢ (अजᭅन और िवकास) अिधिनयम, 1957 (1957 का 20),

(िजसे इसमᱶ इसके प᳟ात उᲦ अिधिनयम कहा गया है) कᳱ धारा 7 कᳱ उपधारा

)

(

के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के

कोयला मंᮢालय कᳱ अिधसूचना सं᭎यांक का.आ. 2789(अ), तारीख 17 जून, 2022 ᳇ारा जो भारत के राजपᮢ,

असाधारण, भाग II, खंड 3, उपखंड (ii), तारीख 17 जून, 2022 मᱶ ᮧकािशत कᳱ गई थी, उᲦ अिधसूचना से संलᲨ

अनुसूची मᱶ िविन᳸दᭅ᳥ पᳯरᭃेᮢ मᱶ 9.624 हे᭍टर (लगभग) या 23.780 एकड़ (लगभग) माप वाली भूिम मᱶ और ऐसी भूिम

मᱶ या उस पर के सभी अिधकारᲂ के अजᭅन करने के अपने आशय कᳱ सूचना दी थी;

और, सᭃम ᮧािधकारी ने उᲦ अिधिनयम कᳱ धारा 8 के अनुसरण मᱶ के᭠ᮤीय सरकार को अपनी ᳯरपोटᭅ दे दी है;

और, के᭠ᮤीय सरकार का, पूवᲄᲦ ᳯरपोटᭅ पर िवचार करने के प᳟ात् और ओिडशा सरकार से परामशᭅ करने के

प᳟ात, यह समाधान हो गया है ᳰक इससे संलᲨ अनुसूची मᱶ यथा वᳶणᭅत 9.624 हे᭍टर (लगभग) या 23.780 एकड़

(लगभग) माप वाली भूिम और ऐसी भूिम मᱶ या उस पर के सभी अिधकार अᳶजᭅत ᳰकए जाने चािहए;

अतः, अब, के᭠ᮤीय सरकार, उᲦ अिधिनयम कᳱ धारा 9 कᳱ उपधारा (1) ᳇ारा ᮧदᱫ शिᲦयᲂ का ᮧयोग करते ᱟए,

यह घोषणा करती है कᳱ, अनुसूची मᱶ वᳶणᭅत 9.624 हे᭍टर (लगभग) या 23.780 एकड़ (लगभग) माप वाली भूिम मᱶ या

उस पर के सभी अिधकार अᳶजᭅत ᳰकए जाते है;

1670

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPETEMBER 17, 2022/BHADRA 26, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

इस अिधसूचना के अंतगᭅत आने वाले ᭃेᮢ के रेखांक सं᭎या एमसीएल /एसए / एसबीओसीपी/जीपी(ड᭣᭨यू)-

एलओ/9(1)/2022/23, तारीख 21 जुलाई,

202 का िनरीᭃण कले᭍टर, िजला अंगुल, ओिडशा - 759122 के कायाᭅलय

मᱶ या कोयला िनयंᮢक, कोयला िनयंᮢक का कायाᭅलय, कोयला मंᮢालय, ᭭कोप मीनार, 5^th ᭢लोर, कोर- 2, ल᭯मी नगर,

ᳰद᭨ली- 110092 के कायाᭅलय मᱶ या िनदेशक (काᳶमᭅक), महानदी कोलफᳱ᭨᭙स िलिमटेड, जागृित िवहार, बुलाᭅ, िजला

स᭥बलपुर- 768020, ओिडशा के कायाᭅलय मᱶ ᳰकया जा सकता है।

अनुसूची

गोपाल ᮧसाद ( पि᳟म) कोल ᭣लॉक

(िजला-अंगुल,रा᭔य - ओिड़शा )

[ रेखांक सं᭎या एमसीएल/एसए/एसबीओसीपी/जीपी(ड᭣᭨यू)-एलओ/9(1)/2022/23,तारीख 21 जुलाई, 2022]

सभी अिधकार:

सुभᮤा ओपन का᭭ट पᳯरयोजना (25 िमिलयन टन ᮧितवषᭅ ) के िलए उ᭜कल- ए कᳱ अिधसूिचत सीमा के अधीन पूवᭅ मᱶ आने

वाले बचे ᱟए ᭡लॉट और गोपालᮧसाद (पि᳟म) कोल ᭣लॉक के भीतर और ᭡लॉट ᭃेᮢ संबंधी ᮧ᭭तािवत ᭃेᮢ कᳱ भूिम के

᭣यौरे ।

ᮓम

सं.

ᮕाम

का

नाम

कोयला ᭣लॉक का नाम

ᮕाम

का

सं᭎यांक

थाना

तहसील

िजला

अजᭅन

ᳰकए जाने

वाला ᭃेᮢ

(एकड़ मᱶ)

ᳯट᭡पणी

छोटाबेरेनी

गोपालᮧसाद (पि᳟म)

172

िनशा

छᱶदीपदा

अंगुल

23.780

पूणᭅ

कुल ᭃेᮢ :

23.780

कुल ᭃेᮢ: 23.780 एकड़ (लगभग) या 9.624 हे᭍टर (लगभग).

ᮕाम छोटाबेरेनी मᱶ अᳶजᭅत ᳰकए गए ᭡लॉट सं᭎यांक:

1. छोटाबेरेनी :

84/382, 84/384(भाग), 84/385(भाग), 84/386(भाग), 84/386/482, 84/386/482/510, 84/386/483,

84/386/483/511, 84/391, 84/391/480, 84/391/480/762, 84/392, 84/393, 84/396(भाग), 85/500 और

85/509(भाग).

सीमा िववरण :

छोटाबेरेनी ᮕाम के सभी बचे ᱟए ᭡लॉट उ᭜कल- ‘ए’ कोयला ᭣लॉक कᳱ पूवᭅ अिधसूिचत सीमा के भीतर हᱹ, वतᭅमान मᱶ यह

गोपालᮧसाद (पि᳟म) कोयला ᭣लॉक अथाᭅत क-ख-ग-घ-ङ-च-छ-ज-झ-ञ-ट-ठ-क कᳱ सीमा के भीतर आता है।

रेखा क–ख: रेखा िब᭠दु ‘क’ से ᮧार᭥भ होती है जो ᮕाम छोटाबेरेनी कᳱ ᭡लॉट सं᭎या- 84 पर ि᭭थत है। इसके बाद यह ᮕाम

छोटाबेरेनी के ᭡लॉट सं᭎या 84, 389, 338, 150, 123 के साथ दिᭃण ᳰदश कᳱ ओर बढ़ती है। इसके बाद

᭡लॉट सं᭎या 2325, 2365, 2368 ᮕाम कᲅिसᳰढप का, ᳰफर ᮕाम कंकरेई के ᭡लॉट सं᭎या 736, 1688,

1748, 1837, 2441, 2067, 2096, 2077 और ᭡लॉट सं᭎या 2065 तक, जहां ᳲबंदु ‘ख’ ि᭭थत है।

रेखा ख-ग : रेखा ᮕाम कंकरेई के ᭡लॉट सं᭎या

2065

पर ि᭭थत

िब᭠दु ‘ख’ से ᮧार᭥भ होती है, ᳰफर यह ᮕाम कंकरेई के

᭡लॉट सं᭎या 2081 और ᮕाम बालीच᭠ᮤपुर के ᭡लाट सं᭎या 215, 363 और ᭡लाट सं᭎या 1853 तक कᳱ

पूवᭅ ᳰदशा कᳱ ओर से चलती है। यह िब᭠दु ‘ग’ के ᮕाम बालीच᭠ᮤपुर के ᭡लॉट सं᭎या 853 पर ि᭭थत है।

रेखा ग–घ : रेखा ᮕाम बालीचंᮤपुर के ᭡लॉट सं᭎या 853 पर ि᭭थत िब᭠दु ‘ग’ से ᮧार᭥भ होती है और यह बालीचंᮤपुर के

᭡लॉट सं᭎या 363, 155, 103 के साथ ही ᮕाम पीरखमन के ᭡लॉट सं᭎या 824 तक उᱫर ᳰदशा कᳱ ओर

बढ़ती है। यह ᳲबंदु 'घ' ᮕाम िपरखमन के ᭡लॉट सं᭎या 824 पर ि᭭थत है।

[भाग II—ख᭛ ड 3(ii)]

भारत का राजपᮢ : िसत᭥ बर 17, 2022/भाᮤ 26, 1944

1671

रेखा घ–ङ : रेखा िब᭠दु ‘घ’ से ᮧार᭥भ होती है जोᳰक ᮕाम िपरखमन के ᭡लॉट सं᭎या 681, 398, 267, 145 और 175 के

साथ उᱫर-पूवᭅ ᳰदशा ᳰक ओर बढ़ती है और ᮕाम कंकरेई के ᭡लॉट सं᭎या 1089 से ᮕाम भालुगिड़या के ᭡लॉट

सं᭎या 2049 तक है। यह ᳲबंदु ‘ङ’ ᮕाम भालुगिड़या के ᭡लॉट सं᭎या 2049 पर ि᭭थत है।

रेखा ङ–च: रेखा िब᭠दु ‘ङ. से ᮧार᭥भ होती है और ᳲसंगड़ा जोर नाला के उᱫर ᳰकनारे तक ᮕाम भालुगिड़या के ᭡लॉट

सं᭎या 2049, 2028, 1841, 630, 802, 221, 479, 378, 283, 286 के साथ उᱫर-पूवᭅ ᳰदशा ᳰक ओर

िब᭠दु ‘च’ तक िमलती है।

रेखा च–छ : रेखा ᳲबंदु ‘च’ से ᮧार᭥भ होती है और ᳲसंगाडा जोर नाला के साथ पि᳟म ᳰदशा कᳱ ओर बढ़ती है जो ᳲबंदु 'छ’

तक िमलती है।

रेखा छ–ज: रेखा ᳲबंदु 'छ’ से ᮧार᭥भ होती है और ᳲसंगाडा जोर नाला के साथ पि᳟म ᳰदशा कᳱ ओर ᳲबंदु 'ज' तक िमलती

है।

रेखा ज–झ: रेखा िब᭠दु 'ज' से ᮧार᭥भ होती है, जो ᮕाम भालुगिड़या और ᳲसंगाडा जोर नाला के ᭡लॉट सं᭎या 1785 के

साथ पि᳟म ᳰदशा कᳱ ओर िब᭠दु “झ” तक िमलती है।

रेखा झ–ञ: रेखा िब᭠दु 'झ' से ᮧार᭥भ होकर ᮕाम कुमुंडा के ᭡लॉट सं᭎या 992, 956, 967, 974 और ᮕाम कांकरेई के

᭡लॉट सं᭎या 4 और 2 के साथ पि᳟म ᳰदशा कᳱ ओर बढ़ती है और ᮕाम कंकरेई के जयपुर आरिᭃत वन और

᭡लॉट सं᭎या 16 को पार करते ᱟए ᮕाम छोटाबेरेनी के ᭡लॉट सं᭎या 392 तक, िब᭠दु ‘ञ’ से िमलती है।

रेखा ञ–ट: रेखा ᮕाम छोटाबेरेनी के ᭡लॉट सं᭎या 392 के ऊपर ि᭭थत िब᭠दु 'ञ' से ᮧार᭥भ होती है और ᮕाम छोटाबेरनी

के ᭡लॉट सं᭎या 632 और 631 तक उᱫर ᳰदशा ᳰक ओर ᭡लॉट सं᭎या 383 ᳰक ओर बढ़ते ᱟए िब᭠दु ‘ट’ पर

िमलती है।

रेखा ट–ठ: रेखा ᮕाम छोटाबेरेनी के ᭡लॉट सं᭎या 383 के ऊपर ि᭭थत िब᭠दु 'ट' से ᮧार᭥भ होती है और ᮕाम कᳱ सीमा के

ᳰकनारे ᮕाम छोटाबेरेनी के ᭡लॉट सं᭎या 84 तक ᳲसंगडा जोर नाला के ᳰकनारे उᱫर ᳰदशा कᳱ ओर होते ᱟए

िब᭠दु ‘ठ’ पर िमलती है।

रेखा ठ–क: रेखा ᮕाम ᳲबंदु 'ठ' से ᮧार᭥भ होती है जो ᮕाम छोटाबेरेनी कᳱ सीमा के ᳰकनारे से होते ᱟए ᭡लॉट सं᭎या 84

पर ि᭭थत है, जो ᳲबंदु 'क' तक ᮕाम छोटाबेरेनी कᳱ सीमा के ᳰकनारे पि᳟म ᳰदशा कᳱ ओर बढ़ती है।

[फा. सं. 43015/16/2021-एलएए᭛डआईआर]

राम िशरोमिण सरोज, िनदेशक

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi, the 14th September, 2022

S.O. 800.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal, number S.O.

2789(E), dated the 17^th June, 2022, issued under sub-section (1) of section 7 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition

and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), published in the Gazette of India,

Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), dated the 17^th June 2022, the Central Government gave notice of its

intention to acquire the land measuring 9.624 hectares (approximately) or 23.780 acres (approximately) and all rights

in or over such lands specified in the Schedule appended to that notification;

And, whereas, the competent authority in pursuance of section 8 of the said Act has made his report to the

Central Government;

And, whereas, the Central Government after considering the aforesaid report and after consulting to the

Government of Odisha, is satisfied that the lands measuring 9.624 hectares (approximately) or 23.780 acres

(approximately) and all rights in or over such lands as described in the Schedule appended hereto, should be acquired;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 9 of the said Act, the

Central Government hereby declares that the land measuring 9.624 hectares (approximately) or 23.780 acres

(approximately) and all rights in or over such lands as described in the Schedule are hereby acquired.

The plan bearing number MCL/SA/SBOCP/GP(W)-LO/9(1)/2022/23, dated the 21^st July, 2022 of the area

covered by this notification may be inspected at the office of the Collector, District Angul, Odisha-759122 or at the

office of the Coal Controller, Coal Controller’s Organisation, Ministry of Coal, Scope Minar, 5^th Floor, Core-II, Laxmi

1672

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPETEMBER 17, 2022/BHADRA 26, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Nagar, Delhi- 110092 or at the office of the Director (Personnel), Mahanadi Coalfields Limited, Post Office - Jagruti

Vihar, Burla, District Sambalpur-768020, Odisha.

SCHEDULE

Gopalprasad (West) Coal Block

(District- Angul, State- Odisha)

[Plan bearing number: MCL/SA/SBOCP/GP(W)-LO/9(1)/2022/23, dated the 21^st July, 2022]

All Rights:

Land details of proposed area towards left over plots and plot areas within Gopalprasad (West) coal block falling

earlier under notified boundary of Utkal-A for Subhadra Open Cast Project (25 million tonne per year).

Sl.

No.

Name of

Village

Name of the coal

block

Village

number

Thasna

Tahasil

District

Area

acquired

(in acres)

Remark

Chhota-bereni

Gopalprasad (West)

172

Nisha

Chhendipada

Angul

23.780

Full

Total area:

23.780

Total area : 23.780 acres (approximately) or 9.624 hectares (approximately).

Plot numbers acquired in the village Chhotabereni:

84/382, 84/384(P), 84/385(P), 84/386(P), 84/386/482, 84/386/482/510, 84/386/483, 84/386/483/511, 84/391,

84/391/480, 84/391/480/762, 84/392, 84/393, 84/396(P), 85/500 and 85/509(P).

Boundary Description:

All the left over plots and plot areas of village Chhotabereni are within the earlier notified boundary

of Utkal-A coal block, presently comes within the block boundary of Gopalprasad (West) coal block i.e A-B-C-

D-E-F-G-H-I-J-K-L-A.

Line A-B: The line starts from point ‘A’, which is situated at plot number 84 of village Chhotabereni. Then it moves

towards south direction along the plot numbers 84, 389, 338, 150 and 123 of village Chhotabereni, then

plot numbers 2325, 2365 and 2368 of village Kaunsidhipa, then plot numbers 736, 1688, 1748, 1837,

2441, 2067, 2096, 2077 and up to the plot number 2065 of village Kankarei, where point ‘B’ is situated.

Line B-C: The line starts from point ‘B’, which is situated on the plot number 2065 of the village Kankarei, then it

runs towards east direction along the plot number 2081 of village Kankarei and plot numbers 215, 363

and up to plot number 853 of village Balichandrapur. The point ‘C’ is situated over the plot number 853

of the village Balichandrapur.

Line C-D: The line starts from point ‘C’, which is situated on the plot number 853 of the village Balichandrapur and

it moves towards the north direction along the plot numbers 363, 155, 103 of Balichandrapur up to plot

number 824 of village Pirakhaman. The point ‘D’ is situated over the plot number 824 of village

Pirakhaman.

Line D-E: The line starts from point ‘D’ and moves towards north-east direction along the plot numbers 681, 398,

267, 145 and 175 of village Pirakhaman and plot number 1089 of village Kankarei up to the plot number

2049 of village Bhalugadia. The point ‘E’ is situated over the plot number 2049 of village Bhalugadia.

Line E-F: The line starts from point ‘E’ and moves towards north-east direction along the plot numbers 2049, 2028,

1841, 630, 802, 221, 479, 378, 283 and 286 of village Bhalugadia up to point ‘F’ at the north bank of

Singada Jore Nallah.

Line F-G: The line starts from point ‘F’ and moves towards west direction along the Singada Jore Nallah up to point

‘G’.

Line G-H: The line starts from point ‘G’ and moves towards west direction along the Singada Jore Nallah up to

point ‘H’.

Line H-I: The line starts from point ‘H’ and moves towards west direction along the plot number 1785 of village

Bhalugadia and Singada Jore Nallah up to point ‘I’.

Line I-J:

The line starts from point ‘I’ and moves towards west direction along the plot numbers 992, 956, 967 and

974 of village Kumunda and plot numbers 4 and 2 of village Kankarei and crossing the Jaipur reserve

forest and plot number 16 of village Kankarei up to point ‘J’ at plot number 392 of village Chhotabereni.

[भाग II—ख᭛ ड 3(ii)]

भारत का राजपᮢ : िसत᭥ बर 17, 2022/भाᮤ 26, 1944

1673

Line J-K: The line starts from point ‘J’, which is situated over the plot number 392 of village Chhotabereni and

moves towards north direction along the plot numbers 632 and 631 up to point ‘K’ at plot number 383 of

village Chhotabereni.

Line K-L: The line starts from point ‘K’, which is situated over the plot number 383 of village Chhotabereni and

runs towards north direction along the bank of Singada Jore Nallah up to point ‘L’ at plot number 84 of

village Chhotabereni across the edge of village boundary.

Line L-A: The line starts from point ‘L’, which is situated on the plot number 84 in the edge of village boundary of

Chhotabereni, moves towards west direction across the edge of village boundary of Chhotabereni up to

point ‘A’.

[F. No. 43015/16/2021-LA&IR ]

RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Director

नई ᳰद᭨ली, 14 िसत᭥बर, 2022

का.आ. 801.— के᭠ᮤीय सरकार को यह ᮧतीत होता है ᳰक इससे उपाब᳍ अनुसूची मᱶ वᳶणᭅत पᳯरᭃेᮢ कᳱ भूिम मᱶ

से कोयला अिभᮧा᳙ होने कᳱ संभावना है ;

और उᲦ अनुसूची मᱶ वᳶणᭅत भूिम के ᭃेᮢ मᱶ अंतᳶवᭅ᳥ करने वाला रेखांक सं᭎यांक आरईवी/08/2022, तारीख 26

जुलाई, 2022 का िनरीᭃण सᱶᮝल कोलफᳱ᭨᭙स िलिमटेड (भूिम और राज᭭व िवभाग), दरभंगा हाउस, राँची – 834029

(झारख᭛ड) के कायाᭅलय मᱶ या महाᮧबंधक, सᱶᮝल कोलफᳱ᭨᭙स िलिमटेड, अरगड़ा ᭃेᮢ, िजला रामगढ़ (झारख᭛ड) के

कायाᭅलय मᱶ या उपायुᲦ, िजला रामगढ़ (झारखंड) के कायाᭅलय मᱶ या महाᮧबंधक (खोज ᮧभाग) आर.आई.-III, के᭠ᮤीय

खान योजना एवं िडजाईन सं᭭थान िलिमटेड, गᲂडवाना पैलेस, कांके रोड, राँची (झारखंड) के कायाᭅलय मᱶ या कोयला

िनयंᮢक, 1, काउंिसल हाउस ᭭ᮝीट, कोलकाता- 700001 के कायाᭅलय मᱶ ᳰकया जा सकता है;

अतः अब, के᭠ᮤीय सरकार, कोयला धारक ᭃेᮢ (अजᭅन और िवकास) अिधिनयम, 1957 (1957 का 20) (िजसे

इसमᱶ इसके प᳟ात उᲦ अिधिनयम कहा गया है) कᳱ धारा 4 कᳱ उप-धारा (1) ᳇ारा ᮧदᱫ शिᲦयᲂ का ᮧयोग करते ᱟए,

उᲦ अनुसूची मᱶ वᳶणᭅत भूिम मᱶ कोयले का पूवᱷᭃण करने के अपने आशय कᳱ सूचना देती है ;

उᲦ अनुसूची मᱶ वᳶणᭅत भूिम मᱶ िहतब᳍ कोई ᳞िᲦ --

(i)

उᲦ अिधिनयम कᳱ धारा 4 कᳱ उप-धारा (3) के अधीन कᳱ गई कारᭅवाई से ᱟई ᭃित या संभािवत ᭃित के

िलए उᲦ अिधिनयम कᳱ धारा 6 के अधीन ᮧितकर का दावा कर सकेगा; या

(ii) उᲦ अिधिनयम कᳱ धारा 13 कᳱ उप - धारा (1) के अधीन समा᳙ हो गई पूवᱷᭃण अनु᭄ि᳙यो के संबंध मᱶ या

उᲦ अिधिनयम कᳱ धारा 13 कᳱ उप - धारा (4) के अधीन समा᳙ हो गये खनन पᲵे के िलए ᮧितकर का

दावा कर सकेगा और उᲦ अिधिनयम कᳱ धारा 13 कᳱ उपधारा (1) के ख᭛ड (i) से खंड (iv) मᱶ िविन᳸दᭅ᳥

मदᲂ के संबंध मे उपगत ᳞य को उपदᳶशᭅत करने के िलए पूवᲃᲦ भूिम से संबंिधत सभी मानिचᮢᲂ, सारिणयᲂ

और अ᭠य द᭭तावेजᲂ को,

इस अिधसूचना के राजपᮢ मᱶ ᮧकाशन कᳱ तारीख से न᭣बे ᳰदनᲂ के भीतर महाᮧबंधक, सᱶᮝल कोलफᳱ᭨᭙स

िलिमटेड, अरगड़ा ᭃेᮢ, िजला रामगढ़ (झारखंड) या महाᮧबंधक, सᱶᮝल कोलफᳱ᭨᭙स िलिमटेड, भूिम और राज᭭व िवभाग,

दरभंगा हाउस, राँची – 834029 (झारख᭛ड) को सुपुदᭅ करेगा ।

1674

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPETEMBER 17, 2022/BHADRA 26, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

अनुसूची

िसरका ओसीपी (1.5 िमिलयन टन ᮧितवषᭅ )

िजला - रामगढ़ (झारख᭛ड)

[ रेखांक सं᭎यांक आरईवी/ 08/ 2022, तारीख 26 जुलाई, 2022 ]

᭣लॉक

ᮕाम

थाना

सं.

अंचल

अथवा

थाना

िजला

अजᭅन के अधीन रकबा

ᳯट᭡पणी

( एकड़ मᱶ )

( हे᭍टेयर मᱶ )

ए

िसरका

136

रामगढ़

96.15

38.91

भाग

बी

िसरका

136

रामगढ़

127.73

51.69

भाग

सी

िसरका

136

रामगढ़

1.15

0.47

भाग

डी

िसरका

136

रामगढ़

2.54

1.03

भाग

ई

िसरका

136

रामगढ़

0.02

0.01

भाग

एफ

िसरका

136

रामगढ़

1.98

0.80

भाग

कुल रकबा (ए+बी+सी+डी+ई+एफ़):

229.57

एकड़

(लगभग)

92.91 हे᭍टेयर

(लगभग)

सीमा वणᭅन :

᭣लॉक

सीमा रेखा

सीमा वणᭅन

ए

ए1- ए 2- ए 3- ए 4- ए 5-ए6–ए7-ए8-

ए9-ए10-ए11-ए12-ए13-ए14-ए15-

ए16-ए17-ए18- ए19- ए20- ए21-

ए22- ए23- ए24- ए25- ए26- ए27- ए1.

रेखा िब᭠दु ‘ए1’ से आरंभ होकर ए2, ए3, ए4, ए5, ए6, ए7,

ए8, ए9, ए10, ए11, ए12, ए13, ए14, ए15, ए16, ए17,

ए18, ए19, ए20, ए21, ए22, ए23, ए24, ए25, ए26, ए27

से गुजरते ᱟए और आरंिभक िब᭠दु ‘ए1’ पर िमलती है।

बी

बी1 - बी2 - बी3 - बी4 - बी5 - बी6 –

बी7 - बी8 - बी9 - बी10 - बी11 -बी12 -

बी13 - बी14 - बी15 - बी16 - बी17 -

बी18 - बी19 - बी20 - बी21 - बी22 -

बी23 - बी24 - बी25 - बी26 - बी27 -

बी28 - बी29 - बी30 - बी31 - बी32 -

बी33 - बी34 - बी 35 - बी36 – बी37 -

बी38 -बी39 - बी40 - बी41- बी42 –

बी43 - बी44 - बी45 - बी46 - बी47 -

बी48 – बी49 - बी50 - बी51 - बी52 -

रेखा िब᭠दु ‘बी1’ से आरंभ होकर बी2, बी3, बी4, बी5, बी6,

बी7, बी8, बी9, बी10, बी11, बी12, बी13, बी14, बी15,

बी16, बी17, बी18, बी19, बी20, बी21, बी22, बी23,

बी24, बी25, बी26, बी27, बी28, बी29, बी30, बी31,

बी32, बी33, बी34, बी35, बी36, बी37, बी38, बी39,

बी40, बी41, बी42, बी43, बी44, बी45, बी46, बी47,

बी48, बी49, बी50, बी51, बी52, बी53, बी54, बी55,

बी56, बी57, बी58, बी59, बी60, बी61, बी62, बी63,

बी64, बी65, बी66, बी67, बी68, बी69, बी70, बी71,

बी72, बी73, बी74, बी75, बी76, बी77, बी78, बी79 से

[भाग II—ख᭛ ड 3(ii)]

भारत का राजपᮢ : िसत᭥ बर 17, 2022/भाᮤ 26, 1944

1675

बी53 - बी54 – बी55 - बी56 – बी57 –

बी58 – बी59 – बी60 – बी61 – बी62 –

बी63 – बी64 – बी65 – बी66 – बी67 –

बी68 – बी69 – बी70 – बी71 – बी72 –

बी73 – बी74 – बी75 – बी76 – बी77 –

बी78 – बी79 - बी1.

गुजरते ᱟए और आरंिभक िब᭠दु ‘बी1’ पर िमलती है।

सी

सी1 - सी2 - सी3 - सी4 - सी5 – सी1.

रेखा िब᭠दु ‘सी1’ से आरंभ होकर िब᭠दु सी2, सी3, सी4, सी5

से गुजरते ᱟए और आरंिभक िब᭠दु ‘सी1’ पर िमलती है ।

डी

डी1 - डी2 - डी3 - डी4 - डी5 - डी6 –

डी7 - डी8 - डी9 - डी10 - डी1.

रेखा िब᭠दु ‘डी1’ से आरंभ होकर िब᭠दु डी2, डी3, डी4, डी5,

डी6, डी7, डी8, डी9, डी10 से गुजरते ᱟए और आरंिभक िब᭠दु

‘डी1’ पर िमलती है।

ई

ई1 - ई2 - ई3 – ई1.

रेखा िब᭠दु ‘ई1’ से आरंभ होकर िब᭠दु ई2, ई3 से गुजरते ᱟए

और आरंिभक िब᭠दु ‘ई1’ पर िमलती है।

एफ

एफ1 - एफ2 - एफ3 - एफ4 - एफ5 -

एफ6 – एफ7- एफ1.

रेखा िब᭠दु ‘एफ1’ से आरंभ होकर िब᭠दु एफ2, एफ3, एफ4,

एफ5, एफ6, एफ7 से गुजरते ᱟए और आरंिभक िब᭠दु ‘एफ1’

पर िमलती है ।

[फा. सं. 43015/12/2022-एलए ए᭛ड आईआर]

राम िशरोमिण सरोज, िनदेशक

New Delhi, the 14th September, 2022

S.O. 801.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that coal is likely to be obtained from the land in

the locality described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

And, whereas, the plan bearing number Rev/08/2022, dated the 26^th July, 2022, containing details of the areas

of land described in the said Schedule may be inspected at the office of the Central Coalfields Limited (Land and

Revenue Department), Darbhanga House, Ranchi- 834029 (Jharkhand) or at the office of the General Manager,

Central Coalfields Limited, Argada Area, District Ramgarh (Jharkhand) or at the office of the Deputy commissioner,

District Ramgarh (Jharkhand) or at the office of the General Manager (Exploration Division), RI- III, Central Mine

Planning and Design Institute, Gondwana Palace, Kanke Road, Ranchi (Jharkhand) or at the office of the Coal

Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata- 700 001;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas

(Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the Central

Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal in land described in the said Schedule ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may –

(i)

claim compensation under section 6 of the said Act for any damage caused or likely to be caused by

any action taken under sub-section (3) of section 4 of the said Act; or

(ii)

claim compensation under sub-section (1) of section 13 of the said Act in respect of prospecting

license ceasing to have effect or under sub-section (4) of section 13 of the said Act, for mining lease

ceasing to have effect and deliver all maps, charts and other documents relating to the aforesaid land

to show the expenditure incurred in respect of items specified in clauses (i) to (iv) of sub-section (1)

of section 13 of the said Act,

to the office of the General Manager, Central Coalfields Limited, Argada Area, District Ramgarh (Jharkhand) or

General Manager, Central Coalfields Limited, Land and Revenue Department, Darbhanga House, Ranchi- 834029

(Jharkhand) within a period of ninety days from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette.

1676

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPETEMBER 17, 2022/BHADRA 26, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

SCHEDULE

SIRKA OCP (1.5 MILLION TONNE PER YEAR)

DISTRICT- RAMGARH (JHARKHAND)

[ plan bearing number Rev/08/2022, dated the 26^th July, 2022 ]

Block

Village

Thana

number

Circle or

Thana

District

Area under acquisition

Remarks

(in acres)

(in hectares)

Sirka

136

Ramgarh

96.15

38.91

Part

Sirka

136

Ramgarh

127.73

51.69

Part

Sirka

136

Ramgarh

1.15

0.47

Part

Sirka

136

Ramgarh

2.54

1.03

Part

Sirka

136

Ramgarh

0.02

0.01

Part

Sirka

136

Ramgarh

1.98

0.80

Part

Total Area (A+B+C+D+E+F):

229.57

acres

(approxi-

mately)

92.91

hectares

(approxi-

mately)

Boundary Description :

Block

Boundary Line

Boundary Description

A1–A2–A3–A4–A5–A6-A7-A8-A9-A10-A11-

A12-A13-A14-15-A16-A17-A18-A19-A20-

A21-A22-A23-A24-A25-A26-A27-A1.

Line starts from point ‘A1’ and passes through points

A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9, A10, A11, A12,

A13, A14, A15, A16, A17, A18, A19, A20, A21,

A22, A23, A24, A25, A26, A27 and meets at starting

point ‘A1’.

B1-B2-B3-B4-B5-B6-B7-B8-B9-B10-B11-B12-

B13-B14-B15-B16-B17-B18-B19-B20-B21-

B22-B23-B24-B25-B26-B27-B28-B29-B30-

B31-B32-B33-B34-B35-B36-B37-B38-B39-

B40-B41-B42-B43-B44-B45-B46-B47-B48-

B49-B50-B51-B52-B53-B54-B55-B56-B57-

B58-B59-B60-B61-B62-B63-B64-B65-B66-

B67-B68-B69-B70-B71-B72-B73-B74-B75-

B76-B77-B78-B79- B1

Line starts from point ‘B1’ and passes through points

B2, B3, B4, B5, B6, B7, B8, B9, B10, B11, B12, B13,

B14, B15, B16, B17, B18, B19, B20, B21, B22, B23,

B24, B25, B26, B27, B28, B29, B30, B31, B32, B33,

B34, B35, B36, B37, B38, B39, B40, B41, B42, B43,

B44, B45, B46, B47, B48, B49, B50, B51, B52, B53,

B54, B55, B56, B57, B58, B59, B60, B61, B62, B63,

B64, B65, B66, B67, B68, B69, B70, B71, B72, B73,

B74, B75, B76, B77, B78, B79 and meets at starting

point ‘B1’.

C1-C2-C3-C4-C5-C1.

Line starts from point ‘C1’ and passes through points

C2, C3, C4, C5 and meets at starting point ‘C1’.

D1-D2-D3-D4-D5-D6-D7-D8-D9-D10-D1.

Line starts from point ‘D1’ and passes through points

D2, D3, D4, D5, D6, D7, D8, D9, D10 and meets at

starting point ‘D1’.

E1-E2-E3-E1.

Line starts from point ‘E1’ and passes through points

E2, E3 and meets at starting point ‘E1’.

F1-F2-F3-F4-F5-F6-F7-F1.

Line starts from point ‘F1’ and passes through points

F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7 and meets at starting point

‘F1’.

[F. No. 43015/12/2022-LA &IR ]

RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Director

[भाग II—ख᭛ ड 3(ii)]

भारत का राजपᮢ : िसत᭥ बर 17, 2022/भाᮤ 26, 1944

1677

᮰म और रोजगार मंᮢालय

नई ᳰद᭨ली, 12 जुलाई, 2022

का.आ. 802.—औ᳒ोिगक िववाद अिधिनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) कᳱ धारा 17 के अनुसरण मᱶ, के᭠ᮤीय

सरकार अ᭟यᭃ एवं ᮧबंध िनदेशक, भारत संचार िनगम िलिमटेड,भारत संचार भवन, हरीश चंᮤ, माथुर लेन, जनपथ, नई

ᳰद᭨ली, ᮰ीमती नेहा ᳲसंह, अवर सिचव, एसईए-ि᳇तीय, दूरसंचार िवभाग, 521, संचार भवन, 20 अशोक रोड,नई

ᳰद᭨ली,के ᮧबंधतंᮢ के संब᳍ िनयोजकᲂ और ᮰ीमती ल᭯मी ढᱭगरा, कामगार, के बीच अनुबंध मᱶ िन᳸दᭅ᳥ के᭠ᮤीय सरकार

औ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण- सह- ᮰म ᭠यायालय-2 नई ᳰद᭨ली पंचाट(संदभᭅ सं᭎या 109/2021) को जैसा ᳰक अनुलᲨक मᱶ

ᳰदखाया गया है,ᮧकािशत करती है जो के᭠ᮤीय सरकार को सॉ᭢ट कॉपी के साथ 12.07.2022 को ᮧा᳙ ᱟआ था l

[सं. एल- 42025-07-2022-22- आईआर-(डीयू)]

डी. के. िहमांशु, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 12th July, 2022

S.O. 802.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 109/2021) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum

Labour Court - II New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

The Chairman & Managing Director,Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.Bharat Sanchar Bhawan, Harish Chandra,Mathur

Lane, Janpath, New Delhi,;Smt. Neha Singh, Under-Secretary, SEA-II,Department of Telecommunications,521,

Sanchar Bhawan, 20 Ashoka Road,New Delhi, and Smt. Laxmi Dhingra, worker which was received along with soft

copy of the award by the Central Government on 12.07.2022.

[No. L- 42025-07- 2022-22-IR(DU)]

D.K.HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II, NEW DELHI

Present: Smt. Pranita Mohanty, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-Cum-Labour

Court-II, New Delhi.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 109/2021

Date of Passing Award- 11.05.2022

Between:

Smt. Laxmi Dhingra,

R/o Flat No. 16, Building No. 152,

Gali No. 02, Saidulajab,

Saket, Near Saket Metro Station,

New Delhi 110030.

…Workman

Versus

The Chairman & Managing Director,

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.

Bharat Sanchar Bhawan, Harish Chandra,

Mathur Lane, Janpath, New Delhi- 110001.

Smt. Neha Singh, Under-Secretary, SEA-II,

Department of Telecommunications,

521, Sanchar Bhawan, 20 Ashoka Road,

New Delhi-110001.

…Managements

Appearances:-

Claimant in person (A/R) : For the Claimant

Shri Swatantra Rai (A/R) : For the Management

1678

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPETEMBER 17, 2022/BHADRA 26, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AWARD

The Government of India in Ministry of Labour & Employment has referred the present dispute existing

between employer i.e. the management of (i) BSNL, and (ii) Department of Telecommunications and its

workman/claimant herein, under clause (d) of sub section (1)and sub section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial

Dispute Act 1947 vide letter No. L- ND.96(18)/ID (2A) 2021-DYCLC dated 27/05/2021 to this tribunal for

adjudication to the following effect.

“Whether the action of the management of BSNL to terminate the services of Smt. Laxmi Dhingra

without paying terminal benefits and promotion to the workman is correct, if not what other relief she

is entitled to?”

This is a reference received from the appropriate government for adjudication in the following terms:-

On receipt of the reference notices were issued to the claimant Laxmi Dhingra and the management BSNL.

After service of the notice the claimant did not appeared and filed one application seeking a direction to the

management for supply of documents relating to her service particulars for the period 19984 to 2007. That petitions

were allowed and the management by order dated 04.08.2021 was directed to provide attested true copies of the

documents to the claimant. On 13.09.2021 the management filed soft copies of the said documents but a direction was

given for supply of the hard copies. On 25.10.2021 the management filed hard copies of the documents but the

claimant did not collect the same from the tribunals filed. Thereafter several adjournments are made for filing of the

claim statement. Today, by sending the email the claimant has expressed her intention not to file any claim statement.

In view of the same this award is passed in the following manner.

ORDER

The reference be and the same is answered against the claimant as no claim has been advanced by the claimant.

Send a copy of this award to the appropriate government for notification as required under section 17 of the ID act

1947.

The reference is accordingly answered.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

PRANITA MOHANTY, Presiding Officer.

नई ᳰद᭨ली, 25 अग᭭त, 2022

का.आ. 803.—रा᳦पित, ᭠यायाधीश (सेवािनवृᱫ) केसांग डोमा भुᳯटया को ᳰदनांक 19.08.2022 के पूवाᭅ᭮न से

65 वषᭅ कᳱ आयु अथाᭅत 04.05.2025 तक अथवा अगले आदेशᲂ तक, जो भी पहले हो, रा᳦ीय औ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण,

कोलकाता के पीठासीन अिधकारी के ᱨप मᱶ िनयुᲦ करते हᱹ।

[सं. अ-19011/01/2022-सीएलएस-II(ई)]

धनंजय शमाᭅ, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 25th August, 2022

S.O. 803.—The President is pleased to appoint Justice (Retd.) Kesang Doma Bhutia as Presiding Officer,

National Industrial Tribunal, Kolkata with effect from 19.08.2022(F/N) and till she attains the age of 65 years i.e. upto

04.05.2025 or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[No. A-19011/01/2022-CLS-II(E)]

DHANANJAY SHARMA, Under Secy.

नई ᳰद᭨ली, 25 अग᭭त, 2022

का.आ. 804—रा᳦पित, ᭠यायाधीश (सेवािनवृᱫ) िवकास कुंवर ᮰ीवा᭭तव को ᳰदनांक 22 अग᭭त, 2022 के

पूवाᭅ᭮न से 21 अग᭭त, 2026 तक 4 वषᲃ कᳱ अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेशᲂ तक, जो भी पहले हो, तक के िलए कᱶᮤीय

सरकार औ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण-सह-᮰म ᭠यायालय न. 1, ᳰद᭨ली मᱶ पीठासीन अिधकारी के पद पर िनयुᲦ करते है।

[भाग II—ख᭛ ड 3(ii)]

भारत का राजपᮢ : िसत᭥ बर 17, 2022/भाᮤ 26, 1944

1679

᭠यायाधीश (सेवािनवृᱫ) िवकास कुंवर ᮰ीवा᭭तव कᳱ पीठासीन अिधकारी, कᱶᮤीय सरकार औ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण

सह-᮰म ᭠यायालय के पद पर िनयुिᲦ अिधकरण सुधार अिधिनयम, 2021 और उसके तहत बने िनयम यािन अिधकरण

(सेवा कᳱ शतᱸ) िनयम, 2021 के अनुसार िविनयिमत कᳱ जाएगी।

[सं. अ-19011/03/2022-सीएलएस-II(ई)]

धनंजय शमाᭅ, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 25th August, 2022

S.O. 804.—The President is pleased to appoint Justice (Retd.) Vikas Kunvar Srivastav as Presiding Officer

of Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Delhi for a period of 4 years with effect from the

forenoon of the 22^nd August, 2022 up to 21^st August, 2026 or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

The appointment of Justice (Retd.) Vikas Kunvar Srivastav as Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-LC shall be

regulated in terms of the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021 and the rules made thereunder, i.e. Tribunals (Conditions of

Service) Rules, 2021.

[No. A-19011/03/2022-CLS-II(E)]

DHANANJAY SHARMA, Under Secy.

नई ᳰद᭨ली, 25 अग᭭त, 2022

का.आ. 805.—रा᳦पित, ᮰ी इरफ़ान कमर को ᳰदनांक 22 अग᭭त, 2022 के अपरा᭮न से 21 अग᭭त, 2026 तक

4 वषᲃ कᳱ अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेशᲂ तक, जो भी पहले हो, तक के िलए कᱶᮤीय सरकार औ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण-

सह-᮰म ᭠यायालय, हैदराबाद मᱶ पीठासीन अिधकारी के पद पर िनयुᲦ करते है।

᮰ी इरफ़ान कमर कᳱ पीठासीन अिधकारी, कᱶᮤीय सरकार औ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण सह-᮰म ᭠यायालय के पद पर

िनयुिᲦ अिधकरण सुधार अिधिनयम, 2021 और उसके तहत बने िनयम यािन अिधकरण (सेवा कᳱ शतᱸ) िनयम, 2021 के

अनुसार िविनयिमत कᳱ जाएगी।

[सं. अ-19011/06/2022-सीएलएस-II(ई)]

धनंजय शमाᭅ, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 25th August, 2022

S.O. 805.—The President is pleased to appoint Sh. Irfan Qamar as Presiding Officer of Central Government

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad for a period of 4 years with effect from the afternoon of the 22^nd

August, 2022 up to 21^st August, 2026 or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

The appointment of Sh. Irfan Qamar as Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-LC shall be regulated in terms of the

Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021 and the rules made thereunder, i.e. Tribunals (Conditions of Service) Rules, 2021.

[No. A-19011/06/2022-CLS-II(E)]

DHANANJAY SHARMA, Under Secy.

नई ᳰद᭨ली, 25 अग᭭त, 2022

का.आ. 806.—रा᳦पित, ᮰ी सुनील कुमार ᳲसंह - I को ᳰदनांक 23 अग᭭त, 2022 के पूवाᭅ᭮न से 22 अग᭭त,

2026 तक 4 वषᲃ कᳱ अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेशᲂ तक, जो भी पहले हो, तक के िलए कᱶᮤीय सरकार औ᳒ोिगक

अिधकरण-सह-᮰म ᭠यायालय, अहमदाबाद मᱶ पीठासीन अिधकारी के पद पर िनयुᲦ करते है।

1680

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPETEMBER 17, 2022/BHADRA 26, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

᮰ी सुनील कुमार ᳲसंह - I कᳱ पीठासीन अिधकारी, कᱶᮤीय सरकार औ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण सह-᮰म ᭠यायालय के पद

पर िनयुिᲦ अिधकरण सुधार अिधिनयम, 2021 और उसके तहत बने िनयम यािन अिधकरण (सेवा कᳱ शतᱸ) िनयम, 2021

के अनुसार िविनयिमत कᳱ जाएगी।

[सं. अ-19011/08/2022-सीएलएस-II(ई)]

धनंजय शमाᭅ, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 25th August, 2022

S.O. 806.—The President is pleased to appoint Sh. Sunil Kumar Singh-I as Presiding Officer of Central

Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad for a period of 4 years with effect from the forenoon

of the 23^rd August, 2022 up to 22^nd August, 2026 or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

The appointment of Sh. Sunil Kumar Singh-I as Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-LC shall be regulated in terms

of the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021 and the rules made thereunder, i.e. Tribunals (Conditions of Service) Rules, 2021.

[No. A-19011/08/2022-CLS-II(E)]

DHANANJAY SHARMA, Under Secy.

नई ᳰद᭨ली, 2 िसत᭥बर, 2022

का.आ. 807.—रा᳦पित, ᭠यायाधीश (सेवािनवृᱫ) आनंद कुमार मुख़जᱮ को ᳰदनांक 01 िसत᭥बर, 2022 के

पूवाᭅ᭮न से 31 अग᭭त, 2026 तक 4 वषᲃ कᳱ अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेशᲂ तक, जो भी पहले हो, तक के िलए कᱶᮤीय

सरकार औ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण-सह-᮰म ᭠यायालय, आसनसोल मᱶ पीठासीन अिधकारी के पद पर िनयुᲦ करते है।

᭠यायाधीश (सेवािनवृᱫ) आनंद कुमार मुख़जᱮ कᳱ पीठासीन अिधकारी, कᱶᮤीय सरकार औ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण सह-

᮰म ᭠यायालय के पद पर िनयुिᲦ अिधकरण सुधार अिधिनयम, 2021 और उसके तहत बने िनयम यािन अिधकरण (सेवा

कᳱ शतᱸ) िनयम, 2021 के अनुसार िविनयिमत कᳱ जाएगी।

[सं. अ-19011/07/2022-सीएलएस-II(ई)]

धनᲳय शमाᭅ, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 2nd September, 2022

S.O. 807.—The President is pleased to appoint Justice (Retd.) Ananda Kumar Mukherjee as Presiding

Officer of Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Asansol for a period of 4 years with effect

from the forenoon of the 01^st September, 2022 up to 31^st August, 2026 or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

The appointment of Justice (Retd.) Ananda Kumar Mukherjee as Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-LC shall be

regulated in terms of the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021 and the rules made thereunder, i.e. Tribunals (Conditions of

Service) Rules, 2021.

[No. A-19011/07/2022-CLS-II(E)]

DHANANJAY SHARMA, Under Secy.

नई ᳰद᭨ली, 7 िसत᭥बर, 2022

का.आ. 808.— रा᳦पित, ᮰ीमती दी᳙ी मोहपाᮢा, पीठासीन अिधकारी के᭠ᮤीय सरकार औ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण सह

᮰म ᭠यायालय, चे᳖ई को ᳰदनांक 19.08.2022 से छ: माह तक कᳱ अविध अथवा िनयिमत आधार पर पद के भरे जाने तक

अथवा अगले आदेश तक, जो भी पहले हो तब तक, के᭠ᮤीय सरकार औ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण सह ᮰म ᭠यायालय, एनाᭅकुलम के

पीठासीन अिधकारी के पद का अितᳯरᲦ ᮧभार सौपते है। I

[सं. अ-11016/05/2020-सीएलएस.II(ई)]

धनᲳय शमाᭅ, अवर सिचव

[भाग II—ख᭛ ड 3(ii)]

भारत का राजपᮢ : िसत᭥ बर 17, 2022/भाᮤ 26, 1944

1681

New Delhi, the 7th September, 2022

S.O. 808.—The President is pleased to entrust the additional charge of the post of Presiding Officer, Central

Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ernakulam to Smt. Dipti Mohapatra, Presiding Officer, Central

Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Chennai for a period of six months with effect from 19.08.2022

or till the post is filled on regular basis or until further orders, whichever is the earliest.

[No. A-11016/05/2020-CLS-II(E)]

DHANANJAY SHARMA, Under Secy.

नई ᳰद᭨ली, 7 िसत᭥बर, 2022

का.आ. 809.—रा᳦पित, ᮰ी सुनील कुमार ᳲसंह-I, पीठासीन अिधकारी के᭠ᮤीय सरकार औ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण सह

᮰म ᭠यायालय, अहमदाबाद को ᳰदनांक 05.09.2022 से छ: माह तक कᳱ अविध अथवा िनयिमत आधार पर पद के भरे

जाने तक अथवा अगले आदेश तक, जो भी पहले हो तब तक, के᭠ᮤीय सरकार औ᳒ोिगक अिधकरण सह ᮰म ᭠यायालय,

जयपुर के पीठासीन अिधकारी के पद का अितᳯरᲦ ᮧभार सौपते है। I

[सं. अ-11016/04/2021-सीएलएस.II(ई)]

धनᲳय शमाᭅ, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 7th September, 2022

S.O. 809.—The President is pleased to entrust the additional charge of the post of Presiding Officer, Central

Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jaipur to Sh. Sunil Kumar Singh-I, Presiding Officer, Central

Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad for a period of six months with effect from

05.09.2022 or till the post is filled on regular basis or until further orders, whichever is the earliest.

[No.A-11016/04/2021-CLS-II(E)]

DHANANJAY SHARMA, Under Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 7 flrEcj] 2022

—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj ch-lh-

lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd

vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky; uacj 1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 44@2001½

dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26

08-2022

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-20012@504@2000-vkbZ-vkj- ¼lh-I

]

jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 7th September, 2022

S.O. 810.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 44/2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court No.1, DHANBAD as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

B.C.C.L. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 26.08.2022.

No. L-20012/504/2000 – IR (C-I)

RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.

1682

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPETEMBER 17, 2022/BHADRA 26, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947

Reference: No. 44/2001

Employer in relation to the management of Bastacolla Area of M/s. BCCL.

AND

Their workman

Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers : None

For the workman. : None

State : Jharkhand

Industry:- Coal

Dated 28.07.2022

AWARD

By Order No.L-20012/504/2000-(C-I) dated 12.02.2001 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour

has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

“᭍या भारत को᳴कंग कोल िलिम., ब᭭ताकोला कोिल॰ के ᮧबंधतंᮢ ᳇ारा ᮰ी तेजो भुईया, ᮝामर को काम पर आने से रोकने

तथा वेतन कᳱ अदायगी न ᳰकया जाना िविधवत िनयमानुसार एवं ᭠यायसंगत है? यᳰद नहᱭ तो कमᭅकार ᳰकस राहत के पाᮢ

हᱹ?”

2. This reference is received on 08/03/2001 by this Tribunal in which the Organising Secretary, Janta Mazdoor

Sangh, Dhanbad had been advised to submit statement of claim along with relevant document before the Tribunal

within fifteen days of received of reference but the union/workman did not appear before the Tribunal. However after

receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed but neither the union/workman nor the management appeared before

the Tribunal. Now case is pending since 08/03/2001 and workman/union as well as management is not appearing

before Tribunal, so it is felt that workman/union has lost its interest in this matter. Hence “No Claim” Award is

passed. Communicate.

D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 7 flrEcj] 2022

—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj ch-

lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdkas vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky; uacj 1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 86/1990½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks

dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26-08-2022 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-20012@306@89-vkbZ-vkj- ¼lh-1½]

jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 7th September, 2022

S.O. 811.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 86/1990) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court No.1, DHANBAD as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

B.C.C.L. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 26.08.2022.

[No. L-20012/306/89- IR (C-I)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.

[भाग II—ख᭛ ड 3(ii)]

भारत का राजपᮢ : िसत᭥ बर 17, 2022/भाᮤ 26, 1944

1683

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947

Reference: No. 86/1990

Employer in relation to the management of Bhatdee Colliery in Mahuda Area No.II of M/s. BCCL

AND

Their workman

Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For Employer

: Sri D. K. Verma, Advocate

For workman

: Sri C. Prasad, Advocate

State : Jharkhand

Industry:- Coal

Dated 29.07.2022

AWARD

By Order No.L-20012/306/89-IR(C-I) dated- Nil, the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in

exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the management of Bhatdee Colliery in Mahuda Area No. II of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal

Ltd., P.O. Mohuda Distt. Dhanbad (Bihar) is justified in dismissing the workman Shri Ram Singh

Under-ground Munshi w.e.f. 22.2.1988? If not, to what relief the said workman is entitled?”

The Tribunal in this matter has passed an award on 09/09/2009 holding that since the concerned workman

has already died and nobody has been substituted, a ‘No Dispute’ Award is passed in this reference presuming non-

existence of any industrial dispute between the parties.

The dependent of concerned workman namely Ram Singh being aggrieved by the said award filed a writ

petition bearing W.P. (L) No. 5719 of 2010 before the Hon’ble High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi. The Hon’ble

High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi has been pleased to hold-

“the Industrial Tribunal committed a serious error in law in dismissing the substitution application dated

04/01/2009. Award dated 09/09/2009 cannot sustain the scrutiny in law. The said award has been passed by

the Industrial Tribunal in gross violation of the mandatory statutory requirement under the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947. In the result the writ petition is allowed. Reference No. 86 of 1990 is restored to its

original file. The Industrial Tribunal is ordered to proceed in the matter in accordance with law.”

After production of the order of Hon’ble High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi passed in W.P.(L) No. 5719 of

2010 on 21/05/2015 sufficient opportunity were given to both the parties and both the parties were heard at length

again.

The case of the sponsoring union as per its statement of claim is as follows:-

That the workman Sri Ram Singh (now deceased) was appointed as Munshi, Underground on 05/03/1968 at

Bhatdee Colliery in Mahuda Area No. II and he was dismissed from his service vide Letter No. B/419, dated

20/2/1988 of the Dy. C.M.E./Agent, Bhatdee Colliery. After that, the concerned workman had raised an Industrial

Dispute before the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C), Dhanbad through sponsoring union and after failure of the

conciliation proceeding the matter was referred to the Ministry for reference of this case.

The concerned workman namely Ram Singh (now deceased) was directed to appear before the Appex

Medical Board for his age determination as a result, the concerned workman appeared before Apex Medical Board

where he came to see that a certificate of the Board of High School & Intermediate Education, Uttar Pradesh of his

own name. The concerned workman totally denied the aforesaid Certificate, which was found with the Appex Medical

Board and he had got no concern with the Matriculation Certificate. The concerned workman had never produced any

Certificate before the management, rather he was falsely implicated in the present case by somebody for which he had

given an information to the local Police Station, Mahuda, which was registered as Station Diary Entry No. 207, dated

15/10/1986, in which he had mentioned the name of Ragho Babu son of Bishwanath Singh of Bhatdee Bazar. The

concerned workman had apprehension in his mind that Ragho Babu might have played a faul game with him by

1684

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPETEMBER 17, 2022/BHADRA 26, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

producing the fake Matriculation Certificate. The concerned workman had denied the allegation levelled against him

in the domestic enquiry proceeding as he had not passed matriculation examination. The concerned workman had not

been given reasonable opportunity to defend himself in the domestic enquiry proceeding. The concerned workman

was innocent and had not committed any offence rather he had been put into wrong box by wicked persons. The

management without going into the depth of the facts, whimsically dismissed the concerned workman from service.

A prayer has been made to pass an Award in favour of the workman.

On the other hand the case of the management as per written statement-cum-rejoinder filed by the General

Manager, Mahuda Area BCCL Area 2, Dhanbad is as follows:-

That the concerned workman had submitted a document purported to be his Matriculation Certificate in proof

of his age and qualification and the management had accepted the same in good faith. Subsequently the management

had entered the date of birth of the concerned workman in the Form ‘B’ Register as per the entries in the aforesaid

Matriculation Certificate but later on, it transpired that the purported Matriculation Certificate was manufacturer

document procured by the concerned workman in support of proof of his age and qualification with malafide

intention. In the Matriculation Certificate submitted by the concerned workman, 7581 has been mentioned as number

and the same has been issued by Board of High School and Intermediate Education, Uttar Pradesh on 30/06/1998 on

the basis of examination held in March and April, 1958 in which the date of birth of workman has been mentioned as

24/01/1942. The date of birth as mentioned in the aforesaid Certificate was accepted as a proof of age of concerned

workman and the same was entered in the Form ‘B’ Register of the concerned workman. The concerned workman

could not be promoted to the next higher clerical grade if he would not possess a Matriculation or equivalent

Certificate, so the Matriculation Certificate was necessary for the concerned workman for his future promotion and in

proof of his age. In the enquiry proceeding it revealed that the Matriculation Certificate bearing no. 7581 was issued in

the name of Kumari Chandra Mohini, daughter of Sri Gobardhan Das, so the concerned workman got that Certificate

manufactured. The concerned workman was issued a charge-sheet dated 23.03.1987/01.04.1987 alleging commission

of misconducts of fraud or dishonesty and giving false age and qualification certificate. The concerned workman had

submitted his reply on 07/04/1987 which was found unsatisfactory. Thereafter management had appointed Sri P.M

Prasad Dy. PM, Mohuda Area to conduct departmental enquiry into the charge-sheet and the concerned workman had

participated in the proceeding. After conclusion of enquiry the Enquiry Officer submitted his enquiry report holding

the concerned workman guilty of misconduct as alleged against him and subsequently the concerned workman was

dismissed from his service vide letter dated 20/02/1988.

The management by way of rejoinder has stated that the contents of Para no.1 of the written statement of

workman are based on reproduction of the terms of reference, the contents of Para nos. 2 and 3 of the written

statement of workman are matters of record, the contents of Para nos. 4, 5 and 6 of the written statement of workman

are not fully correct, the contents of Para nos. 7 and 8 of the written statement of workman are incorrect and the same

are denied, the contents of Para nos. 9 and 10 of the written statement of workman are matters of record and the

contents of the rest of the paras of the written statement of workman are incorrect and the same are denied.

The sponsoring union has submitted rejoinder to the written statement of the management in which it has

been stated that the statement made in Para no.1 of the written statement of management is matter of record, the

statement made in Para nos. 2, 4 to 6 are denied, the statement made in Para nos. 7, 9 and 10 are not correct, the

statement made in Para no.8 is correct, the statement made in Para no. 11 is not justified and the statement made in

Para nos.12 to 19 are the rejoinder of the management.

The sponsoring union has neither examined any witness in support of its case nor has produced any

documents.

The management has also not examined any witness in this case but has proved following documents which

are marked as :-

Exhibit M-1- Copy of Charge-sheet dated 23.3/01.04.1987.

Exhibit M-2- Copy of reply to the Charge-sheet dated 23.3/01.04.1987.

Exhibit M-3- Letter of appointment of Enquiry Officer and the Presenting Officer.

Exhibit M-4- Copy of the enquiry proceedings along with Exhibit notices enquiries and all connected papers

relating to enquiry.

Exhibit M-5- Copy of Enquiry Report.

Exhibit M-6- Copy of Note sheet dated 12/02/1988 relating to approval for dismissal.

Exhibit M-7- Copy of Letter dated 20/02/1988 regarding Dismissal Order.

10.

The learned lawyer of the sponsoring union has submitted before the Tribunal that the concerned workman

had been directed to appear before the Apex Medical Board for his age determination and in pursuance to such

[भाग II—ख᭛ ड 3(ii)]

भारत का राजपᮢ : िसत᭥ बर 17, 2022/भाᮤ 26, 1944

1685

direction the concerned workman had appeared before the Board where he found a fake certificate of Board of High

School & Intermediate Education, Uttar Pradesh of his own name. He has also submitted that the said concocted and

fabricated certificate was found with the Apex Medical Board without any petition for filing before the same and it

was not within the knowledge of the concerned workman. He has also argued that the concerned workman had never

produced the said certificate to the management and on finding foul play by the co-worker in connivance with

management of the colliery, the concerned workman had filed a complaint to local police station, Mahuda which was

registered in Station Diary Entry No. 207dated 15/10/1986. He has further submitted that the management had issued

a charge-sheet to the concerned workman and the same was replied but the reply was not found satisfactory by the

management and subsequently a domestic enquiry proceeding was started against him. He has further submitted that

the management was biased against the concerned workman due to his filing a complaint before the Mahuda Police

Station. He has further submitted that the management had not produced before the Enquiry Officer said false and

fabricated certificate. He has also argued that the Tribunal after hearing on preliminary issue has held the enquiry fair

and proper. He has made prayer that since the concerned workman has been dismissed from service and the case may

be dealt with under section 11-A of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. He has also submitted that the alleged false, fake

certificate of education has not been marked as Exhibit, so it may not be taken into consideration. He has also argued

that the signatures of concerned workman were obtained forcibly on the departmental enquiry proceeding. He has

further argued that the copy of the enquiry report had not been supplied to the concerned workman which is violatory

of the principle of natural justice. He has relied on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court as reported in 1991 SCC

(L&S) 612.

11.

The learned lawyer of management has submitted before the Tribunal that the concerned workman had

submitted his Matriculation Certificate in proof of his age and qualification which was accepted by the management in

good faith and subsequently entered the date of birth in the Form ‘B’ Register as per the entries in the aforesaid

Matriculation Certificate but later on it transpired that the purported Matriculation Certificate was a manufactured

document procured by the concerned workman in support of his proof of age and qualification. He has also argued

that the purported certificate of matriculation bearing no. 7581 was issued by the Board of High School &

Intermediate Education, Uttar Pradesh on 30/06/1958 on the basis of examination held in March and April 1958 in

which the date of birth had been shown as 24/01/1942. He has further argued that on the basis of said purported

matriculation certificate of workman the date of birth of the concerned workman was accepted as proof of his age and

the same was entered in the Form ‘B’ Register. He has also submitted that the workman being a clerical grade could

not be promoted to the next higher clerical grade unless he possessed a matriculation or equivalent certificate, so the

matriculation certificate was necessary for the concerned workman for his future promotion and in proof of his age.

He has also argued that after enquiry it was found that the matriculation certificate bearing no. 7581 was issued in the

name of Kumari Chandra Mohini, daughter of Sri Gobardhan Das and the concerned workman had procured the said

certificate with mala-fide intention. He has further submitted that the concerned workman was issued a charge-sheet

dated 23-03-1987/01-04-1987 and subsequently he had submitted his reply on 07/04/1987 which was not found

satisfactory and thereafter a domestic enquiry was held in which the charges against the concerned workman was

established and thereafter he was dismissed from the service. He has also argued that the departmental enquiry

conducted against the concerned workman has been held fair and proper vide order dated 18/02/2016 of this Tribunal.

He has also submitted that the punishment awarded to the concerned workman is proportionate as he had produced

fake matriculation certificate which amounts to fraud to the Company. He has made prayer that provisions of u/s 11-A

of the I.D. Act may not be invoked in this case. He has relied on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court as reported in

2018(4) JLJR (SC) 115, AIR 2004 SC 4096 and AIR, 1996 SC 686.

12.

Now, the only point of determination in this case is whether the action of the management in dismissing the

workman Shri Ram Singh is justified or not?

FINDINGS

13.

At the outset of discussion it is required to mention here that it is an admitted fact that the concerned

workman namely Ram Singh (now deceased) was a Munshi at Bhatdee Colliery in Mahuda Area No. II. It is also

admitted fact that a departmental enquiry was conducted against the concerned workman and after conclusion of

departmental enquiry, the Enquiry Officer submitted his report holding the concerned workman guilty of alleged

misconduct and subsequently the workman was dismissed from the service.

14.

It is relevant to mention here that on admission of both the parties the documents of domestic enquiry

proceeding is marked as Exhibit M-1 to Exhibit M-7. It appears from order sheet dated 23/08/1995 that since the

management has failed to adduce evidence, so the workman is called upon to adduce evidence on the preliminary

issue but on 03/11/1995 the workman has not produced any witness on its behalf and both the side agreed to argue on

the preliminary issue.

15.

It is also required to mention here that the Tribunal after hearing learned lawyer of both the parties has held

on 18/02/2016 that the enquiry conducted against the concerned workman is fair and proper.

1686

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPETEMBER 17, 2022/BHADRA 26, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

16.

It is relevant to mention here that in this case the Tribunal has already held the enquiry fair and proper, so it

is not proper to go into the enquiry proceeding in this case but since the learned lawyer of the sponsoring union has

raised the issue that the management had not produced the purported matriculation certificate of the concerned

workman, so the Tribunal thinks it examine the documents produced in course of domestic enquiry.

After going through the enquiry proceeding report it appears that a certificate bearing no. 07581 standing in the name

of Ram Singh, son of Sri Kailash Singh issued by Board of High School and Intermediate Education, Uttar Pradesh on

30/06/1958 mentioning his date of birth as 24/01/1942 is attached with the enquiry proceeding and the same has been

marked as Exhibit No.1 of the enquiry proceeding but after enquiry it was found that the matriculation certificate

bearing no. 7581 was issued in the name of Kumari Chandra Mohini daughter of Sri Gobardhan Das.

17.

It is also relevant to mention here that the learned lawyer of the sponsoring union has raised the issue that he

had not produced such documents before the management in support of his age and qualification.

In this regard it is required to mention here that no oral and documentary evidence have been produced by the

sponsoring union in support of his argument that he had not produced any such documents before the management.

Moreover the sponsoring union has also not produced the copy of Station Diary Entry No. 207, dated 15/10/1986 of

Mahuda, so the contention of sponsoring union is baseless.

18.

The learned lawyer of sponsoring union has raised the issue that he had not been given copy of the enquiry

report and the Hon’ble Supreme Court in a case as reported in 1991 SCC (L&S) 612.

In this regard it is relevant to mention here that the concerned workman had fully participated in the enquiry

proceeding and he had not raised this issue at the earliest stage of filing written statement before the Tribunal and now

he had raised this issue at the concluding stage of the case, so his contention is not worth tenable.

19.

The learned lawyer of sponsoring union has submitted before the Tribunal that the concerned workman has

been dismissed from the service and his case may have been dealt with under section 11A of the Industrial Dispute

Act as the punishment awarded to the concerned workman is disproportionate to his guilt.

However the learned lawyer of management has strongly opposed the grant of benefit to the concerned

workman under section 11A of the I.D. Act and he has relied on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court as reported in

2018 (4) JLJR (SC) 115, AIR 2004 SC 4096 and AIR, 1996 SC 686.

At this stage it is required to mention section 11A of the I.D. Act. The section 11A of the I.D. Act reads as

follows:-

Section 11A- “Powers of Labour Courts, Tribunals and National Tribunals to give appropriate relief in case

of discharge or dismissal of workmen- Where an industrial dispute relating to the discharge or dismissal of a

workman has been referred to a Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal for adjudication proceedings,

the Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal, as the case may be, is satisfied that the order of discharge or

dismissal was not justified, it may, by its award, set aside the order of discharge or dismissal and direct

reinstatement of the workman on such terms and conditions, if any, as it thinks fit, or give such other relief to

the workman including the award of any lesser punishment in lieu of discharge or dismissal as the

circumstances of the case may require.”

20.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court has been pleased to observe in a case as reported in 1973 AIR 1227 (Workmen

of Messrs Firestone Tyre…Vs Management & others) that:-

“The Act is beneficial piece of legislation enacted in the interest of employees. It is well settled that in

construing the provisions of a welfare legislation, courts should adopt, what is described as a beneficent rule

of construction. If two constructions are reasonably possible to be placed on the section, it follows that the

construction which furthers the policy and object of the Act and is more beneficial to the employees has to be

preferred. The interpretation must be liberal enough to achieve the legislative purpose”.

21.

However the Hon’ble Supreme Court in a another case as reported in 2005(2) SCALE 302 (Mahindra and

Mahindra Ltd. Vs. N.B. Narawade) has been pleased to hold that:-

“It is no doubt true that after introduction of Section 11A in the Industrial Disputes Act, certain amount of

discretion is vested with the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal in interfering with the quantum of punishment

awarded by the Management where the concerned workman is found guilty of misconduct. The said area of

discretion has been very well defined by the various judgments of this court referred to herein above and it is

certainly not unlimited as has been observed by the Division Bench of the High Court. The discretion which

can be exercised under Section 11A is available only on the existence of certain factors like punishment

being disproportionate to the gravity of misconduct so as to disturb the conscience of the Court, or the

existence of any mitigating circumstances which requires the reduction of the sentence, or the past conduct of

the workman which may pursuade the Labour Court to reduce the punishment. In the absence of any such

[भाग II—ख᭛ ड 3(ii)]

भारत का राजपᮢ : िसत᭥ बर 17, 2022/भाᮤ 26, 1944

1687

factor existing, the Labour Court cannot by way of sympathy alone exercise the power under Section 11A of

the Act and reduce the punishment.”

22.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in other case as reported in 2018 (4) JLJR (SC) 115 on which reliance has been

placed by the learned lawyer of management, has been pleased to hold that:-

“since dismissal order was based on the domestic enquiry, it was obligatory upon the Labour Court to first

decide the question as a preliminary issue as to whether the domestic enquiry was legal and proper- if

domestic enquiry was legal and proper, next question to be considered by the Labour Court was whether

punishment is commensurate with the gravity of charges or is disproportionate- if it is disproportionate,

Labour Court was entitled to interfere in quantum of punishment and substitute the punishment imposed by

Bank.”

23. In the instant case the concerned workman has been found guilty of misconduct of fraud, dishonesty and giving

false information about himself which is under serious misconduct under the Standing Order Clause, so considering

the gravity of the misconduct, the Tribunal is of the view that the punishment of dismissal awarded to the concerned

workman is not disproportionable.

In view of such, the Tribunal is not of the view to reduce the punishment of dismissal of the concerned

workman.

Hence, the contention of learned lawyer of sponsoring union regarding disproportionate punishment is not

worth tenable.

24.

Now, in this case the charges levelled against the concerned workman namely Sri Ram Singh, Munshi of

Bhatdee Colliery vide charge-sheet dated 23.03/01.04/1987 had been established in the departmental enquiry

proceeding for misconduct of fraud and dishonesty and giving false information of about himself which is serious

misconduct under the Standing Order Clause.

Moreover, on the finding of Enquiry Officer, the competent authorities have applied their mind and

subsequently the concerned workman namely Sri Ram Singh was dismissed from service.

25. After considering all the facts and circumstances of this case the Tribunal comes to the conclusion that the

management of Bhatdee Colliery, Mahuda Area II of M/s. BCCL is justified in dismissing the workman Sri Ram

Singh service of BCCL w.e.f. 22/02/1998 and he is not entitled for any relief.

This is the Award of this Tribunal.

D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 8 flrEcj] 2022

—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj

chch,ech ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky; uacj 2] paMhx<+ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 07/2018½ dks izdkf”kr djrh gS]

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 07-09-2022 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-23012@18@2018-vkbZ- vkj- ¼lh-,e-II½]

jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 8th September, 2022

S.O. 812.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No.07/2018) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court NO 2, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

BBMB and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 07.09.2022.

[No. L-23012/18/2018-IR(CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.

1688

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPETEMBER 17, 2022/BHADRA 26, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II,

CHANDIGARH

Present: Sh. S.K. Thakur, Presiding Officer

ID No.07/2018

Registered on:-04.06.2018

Sh. Mohinder Kumar S/o Sh. Jhali C/o SH. R.K. Singh Parmar,

General Secretary, Punjab INTUC, 211L, ward No.11,

Post Office Partap Nagar, Nangal Dam, District Ropar –(Punjab)

…Workman

Versus

The Chairman, Bhakra Beas Management Board,

Madhya Marg, Sector 19-B, Chandigarh-160019.

The Chief Engineer, Bhakra Beas Management Board,

BSL Project, Sundernagar-175038.

…Respondents/Managements

AWARD

Passed On:- 25.05.2022

Central Government vide Notification No.L-23012/18/2018-IR(CM-II) dated 21.05.2018, under clause (d) of

sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(hereinafter called the Act), has referred the

following Industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal.

‘‘Whether the action of the management of BBMB in not accepting the demand of Sh. Mohinder

Kumar S/o Sh. Jhali for deeming/considering him in continuous service upto age of superannuation

and resultantly entitled for consequential benefits is legal, just and valid? If not, to what relief the

workman concerned is entitled to and from which date?’’

1. The Ministry of Labour & Employment, Government of India while referring the above Industrial Dispute for

adjudication also directed the following:-

“The parties raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete within relevant documents, list of

reliance and witnesses with the Tribunal within fifteen days of the receipt of this order of reference and

also forward a copy of such a statement to each of the opposite parties involved in this dispute under rule

10(B) of the Industrial dispute (Central), Rules, 1957”.

2. However, no claim statement was filed by the workman within the stipulated period. Despite the directions of

the Central Government not complied by the workman opportunity was provided to the workman and, therefore, on

receipt of the above reference notice was sent to the workman as well as to the respondents/managements for

appearances for adjudication. The postal article sent to the workman, referred above, is deemed to have been served

on the parties under dispute as the post sent has not been received back as undelivered.

Workman has been given sufficient opportunities to file claim statement but none turned up in spite of

several opportunities afforded to file claim statement. This shows that the workman is not interested in adjudication of

the matter on merit.

Since the workman has neither put his appearance nor he has filed statement of claim to prove his cause

against the respondents/managements. As such this Tribunal is left with no alternative except to pass a ‘No Claim

Award’. Accordingly, ‘No Claim Award’ is passed in the instant reference ID No.07/2018.

Let copy of this award be sent to the Appropriate Government as required under Section 17 of the Act for

publication.

S. K. THAKUR, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 8 flrEcj] 2022

—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]dsUnzh; ljdkj ch

ch ,e ch ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdkas vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg&Je U;k;ky; uacj 2] paMhx<+ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 55/2018½ dks izdkf”kr djrh gS]

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 07-09-2022 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y-23012@78@2018-vkbZ- vkj- ¼lh,e-II½]

jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo

[भाग II—ख᭛ ड 3(ii)]

भारत का राजपᮢ : िसत᭥ बर 17, 2022/भाᮤ 26, 1944

1689

New Delhi, the 8th September, 2022

S.O. 813.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No.55/2018) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court NO 2, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

BBMB and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 07.09.2022.

[No. L-23012/78/2018– IR (CM-II)

RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II,

CHANDIGARH

Present: Sh. S.K. Thakur, Presiding Officer

ID No. 55/2018

Registered on:-20.11.2018

Sh. Durga Dass S/o Sh. Chamaroo, R/o Village Behla (Bayla)

PO Bayla Tehsil Sunder Nagar, Distt. Mandi (HP)-175001

…Workman

Versus

The Chairman, Bhakra Beas Management Board,

Madhya Marg, Sector 19-B, Chandigarh-160019.

The Chief Engineer, Bhakra Beas Management Board,

BSL Project, Sundernagar-175038.

…Respondents/Managements

AWARD

Passed On:- 25.05.2022

Central Government vide Notification No.L-23012/78/2018-IR(CM-II) dated 14/11/2018, under clause (d) of

sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(hereinafter called the Act), has referred the

following Industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal.

“Whether the action of the management of BBMB in not accepting the demand of Sh. Durga Dass S/o

Sh. Chamaroo for deeming/considering him in continuous service upto age of superannuation and

resultantly entitled for consequential benefits is legal, just and valid? If not, to what relief the