6081 GI/2022

(1749)

रजिस्ट्री सं. डी.एल. (एन) 04/0007/2003—05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

xxxGIDHxxx

xxxGIDExxx

प्राजिकार से प्रकाजित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप् ताजिक

WEEKLY

सं.

38]

नई दिल् ली, जसतम् बर 18— जसतम् बर 24, 2022, िजनवार/ भाद्र 27— आज‍ वन 2, 1944

No. 38]

NEW DELHI, SEPTEMBER 18—SEPTEMBER 24, 2022, SATURDAY/BHADRA 27– ASVINA 2, 1944

इस भाग में जभन् न ृष्‍ सं्‍ ा िी िाती िज जिससे दक ि ृष क संकलन के प ृ में र ा िा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भागII— ण् ड 3—उृ- ण् ड(ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्राल ों (रक्षा मंत्राल को छोड़कर) द्वारा िारी दकए गए सांजवजिक आिेि और अजिसूचनाएं

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

जविेि मंत्राल

(सी.ृी.वी.)

नई दिल्ली, 19 जसतम् बर, 2022

का.आ. 856.—रािनज क और कोंसुली अजिकारी (िृ एवं फीस) के अजिजन म, 1948 की िारा 2 के ंड

(क) के अनुसरण में वजिाजनक आिेि ।

एति् द्वारा, सरकार भारत के राििूतवास ि िेग में संिीृ तंवर, वजिक सिा क को दिनांक 19 जसतम्बर,

2022

से सिा क कोंसुलर अजिकारी के तौर ृर कोंसुलर सेवाओं के जनवविन के जलए प्राजिकषत करती िज।

[फा. सं. टी. 4330/01/2022 (38)]

एस.आर.एच. फिमी, उृ सजचव (कांसुलर)

सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-03102022-239318

CG-DL-W-03102022-239318

सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-03102022-239318

CG-DL-W-03102022-239318

सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-03102022-239318

CG-DL-W-03102022-239318

सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-03102022-239318

CG-DL-W-03102022-239318

1750

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPETEMBER 24, 2022/ASVINA 2, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

(CPV Division)

New Delhi, the 19th September, 2022

S.O. 856.—Statutory Order in pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular

Officers (Oaths and fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Sandeep Panwar,

Personal Assistant as Assistant Consular Officer in the Embassy of India, The Hague to perform the consular services

as Assistant Consular Officer with effect from September 19, 2022.

[F. No.T.4330/01/2022 (38)]

S.R.H FAHMI, Dy. Secy. (Consular)

नई दिल्ली, 22 जसतम् बर, 2022

का.आ. 857.—रािनज क और कोंसुली अजिकारी (िृ एवं फीस) के अजिजन म, 1948 की िारा 2 के ंड

(क) के अनुसरण में वजिाजनक आिेि ।

एतद्द्वारा, सरकार भारत के राििूतवास बगिाि में िेवेंद्र ससंि जबष्ट, सिा क अनुभाग अजिकारी को दिनांक 22

जसतम्बर, 2022 से सिा क कोंसुलर अजिकारी के तौर ृर कोंसुलर सेवाओं के जनवविन के जलए प्राजिकषत करती िज।

[फा. सं. टी.4330/01/2022 (39)]

एस.आर.एच. फिमी, उृ सजचव (कांसुलर)

New Delhi, the 22nd September, 2022

S.O. 857.—Statutory Order in pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular

Officers (Oaths and fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Devendra Singh

Bisht, Assistant Section Officer as Assistant Consular Officer in the Embassy of India, Baghdad to perform the

consular services as Assistant Consular Officer with effect from September 22, 2022.

[F. No.T.4330/01/2022 (39)]

S.R.H FAHMI, Dy. Secy. (Consular)

को ला मंत्राल

नई दिल्ली, 20 जसतम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 858.—केन्द्री सरकार को ि प्रतीत िोता िज दक इससे उृाबद्ध अनुसूची (जिसे इसमें इसके ृश्चात् उि

अनुसूची किा ग ा िज) में उजल्लज त भूजम में (जिसे इसमें इसके ृश्चात् उि अनुसूची किा ग ा िज) को ला अजभप्राप्त दकए

िाने की संभावना िज ।

इस अजिसूचना के अिीन आने वाले रे ांक सं्‍ ा एमसीएल/िीएम(एचए)/एलएण्डआर-I/2022/351, तारी 15

िून, 2022 का जनरीक्षण, जनिेिक (कार्मवक), मिानिी कोलफील््स जलजमटेड, िागषजत जविार, बुलाव, जिला संबलृुर -

768020, ओजडिा के का ावल में, ा मु्‍ मिाप्रबंिक ( ोि प्रभाग), सेंरल माइन प्लासनंग एण्ड जडिाइन इन्स्ट्टीच् ूट

जलजमटेड, गोंिवाना प्लेस, कांके रोड, रांची, झार ंड के का ावल में ा को ला जन ंत्रक, 1, काउंजसल िाउस स्ट्रीट,

कोलकाता-700001 के का ावल में ा जिला कलेक्टर, जिला अंगुल, ओजडिा के का ावल में दक ा िा सकता िज ।

अत: अब केन्द्री सरकार, को ला िारक क्षेत्र (अिवन और जवकास) अजिजन म, 1957 (1957 का 20) (जिसे इसमें

इसके ृ‍ चात् उि अजिजन म किा ग ा िज) की िारा 4 की उृिारा (1) द्वारा प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, उस

भूजम में को ले का ृूवेक्षण करने के अृने आि की सूचना िेती िज ;

उक् त अनुसूची में उजल्लज त भूजम में जितबद्ध कोई व्यजि --

(i)

उक् त अजिजन म की िारा 4 की उृिारा (3) के अिीन की ग ी दकसी का वािी से हुई ा िोने वाली संभाजवत

दकसी क्षजत के जलए अजिजन म की िारा 6 के अिीन प्रजतकर का िावा कर सकेगा, अ वा

(ii)

उक् त अजिजन म की िारा (13) की उृिारा (1) के अिीन ृूवेक्षण अनुज्ञजप्त ों के प्रभाविीन िोने के संबंि में ा

उक् त अजिजन म की िारा 13 की उृिारा (4) के अिीन नन ृट्टे प्रभाविीन िोने के जलए प्रजतकर का िावा कर

सकेगा और उसे उक् त अजिजन म की िारा 13 की उृ-िारा की उृिारा (1) के ंड (i) से ंड (iv) में जवजनर्िवष्ट

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 24, 2022/ आज‍ वन 2, 1944

1751

मिों की बाबत् उृगत व्य को उृिर्िवत करने के जलए ृूवोि भूजम से संबंजित सभी मानजचत्रों, चाटों और अन्

िस्ट्तावेिों को ृररित्त कर सकेगा,

रािृत्र में इस अजिसूचना के प्रकािन की तारी से नब्बे दिन के भीतर, जनिेिक (कार्मवक), मिानिी कोलफील््स

जलजमटेड, िागषजत जविार, बुलाव, संबलृुर -768020, ओजडिा को भेि सकेगा।

अनुसूची

बलभद्र ओृनकास्ट्ट ृरर ोिना

बलभद्र को ला ब्लॉक,

बलभद्र उत्तर जवस्ट्तार को ला ब्लॉक,

बलभद्र ृजश्चम जवस्ट्तार को ला ब्लॉक

जिला अंगुल, ओजडिा

[ रे ांक सं्‍ ा एमसीएल/िीएम(एचए)/एलएण्डआर-I/2022/351, तारी 15 िून, 2022 ]

क्रम

सं.

ग्राम का नाम

ाना

तिसील

जिला

क्षेत्र एकड़ में

(लगभग)

रटप्ृणी

कुमुंडा

कजनिा

तालचेर

अंगुल

1111.97

भाग

जचत्तलृुर

कजनिा

तालचेर

अंगुल

532.52

ृूणव

ृाराबेड़ा

कजनिा

तालचेर

अंगुल

138.88

ृूणव

मरिािररिरृुर

कजनिा

तालचेर

अंगुल

644.81

ृूणव

बनबासृुर

कोजल री

तालचेर

अंगुल

192.93

भाग

बड़ािार

कजनिा

अंगुल

158.59

भाग

बड़कर ा

संरजक्षत वन

कजनिा

अंगुल

1004.64

भाग

िॉ ृुर

संरजक्षत वन

छेंडीृिा

अंगुल

525.09

भाग

िोड़ : 1744.00 िेक्टे र (लगभग) ा 4309.43 एकड़ (लगभग)

सीमा वणवन :

क- -ग : ि रे ा िॉ ृुर संरजक्षत वन में सबंिु ‘क’ से िुप िोती िज और बड़कार ा संरजक्षत वन में सबंिु ‘ ’ के माध् म से

ृूवव में ससंगिा नाला ृर सबंिु ‘ग’ तक िाती िज िोदक गांव बड़ािार की ृूवी सीमा ृर िज।

ग-घ-ड. : ि रे ा सबंिु ‘ग’ से िुप िोती िज और ससंगिा नाला के सा बनबासृुर के माध् म से जबन्िु ‘घ’ से िोते हुए आगे

बढ़ती िज, दफर गांव ृाराबेड़ा की ृूवी और िजक्षणी सीमाओं के सा बढ़ते हुए, दफर गांव कुमुंडा की िजक्षणी सीमा से िोते

हुए सबंिु ‘ड.’ तक िाती िज।

ड.-च-क : ि रे ा सबंिु ‘ड.’ से िुप िोती िज और कुमुंडा गााँव के माध् म से बढ़ते हुए, िॉ ृुर संरजक्षत वन में सबंिु ‘च’ से

िोते हुए सबंिु ‘क’ ृर जमलती िज।

[ फा. सं. 43015/11/2022-एलएएण्डआईआर ]

राम जिरोमजण सरोि, जनिेिक

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi, the 20th September, 2022

S.O. 858.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that coal is likely to be obtained from the land in

the locality (hereinafter referred to as the land) described in the Schedule (hereinafter referred to as the said schedule)

annexed hereto.

And, whereas, the plan bearing number MCL/GM(HA)/L&R-I/2022/351, dated the 15^th June, 2022

containing details of the land described in the said Schedule may be inspected at the office of the Director

1752

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPETEMBER 24, 2022/ASVINA 2, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(Personnel), Mahanadi Coalfields Limited, Jagruti Vihar, Burla, District Sambalpur -768020, Odisha or Chief

General Manager (Exploration Division), Central Mine Planning and Design Institute Limited, Gondwana Place,

Kanke Road, Ranchi, Jharkhand or at the office of the Coal Controller,1, Council House Street, Kolkata-700001

or at the office of the District Collector, District Angul, Odisha.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas

(Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the Central

Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal from the land described in the said Schedule.

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may--

(i)

claim compensation under section 6 of the said Act for any damage caused or likely to be caused by any

action taken under sub-section(3) of section 4 thereof; or

(ii) claim compensation under sub-section(1) of section 13 of the said Act in respect of prospecting licenses

ceasing to have effect, or under sub-section(4) of section 13 of the said Act for mining lease ceasing to have

effect, and deliver all maps, charts and other documents relating to the land to show the expenditure

incurred in respect of items specified in clauses(i) to (iv) of sub-section (1) of section 13 of the said Act,

to the office of the Director (Personnel), Mahanadi Coalfields Limited, Jagruti Vihar, Burla, District Sambalpur -

768020, Odisha within a period of ninety days from the date of publication of this notification in the official

Gazette.

SCHEDULE

BALABHADRA OPENCAST PROJECT

BALABHADRA COAL BLOCK,

BALABHADRA NORTH EXTENSION COAL BLOCK,

BALABHADRA WEST EXTENSION COAL BLOCK.

DISTRICT ANGUL, STATE ODISHA.

[ Plan bearing number MCL/GM(HA)/L&R-I/2022/351, dated the 15^th June, 2022 ]

Sl.

No.

Name of village

Thana

Tahasil

District

Area in acres

(approxi-

mately)

Remarks

Kumunda

Kaniha

Talcher

Angul

1111.97

PART

Chitalpur

Kaniha

Talcher

Angul

532.52

FULL

Parabeda

Kaniha

Talcher

Angul

138.88

FULL

Maradahariharpur

Kaniha

Talcher

Angul

644.81

FULL

Banabaspur

Colliery

Talcher

Angul

192.93

PART

Badahar

Kaniha

Angul

158.59

PART

Badakathia

Reserve Forest

Kaniha

Angul

1004.64

PART

Jaypur

Reserve Forest

Chhendipada

Angul

525.09

PART

Total: 1744.00 hectares (approximately)

or 4309.43 acres (approximately)

Boundary Description:

A-B-C: The line starts from Point ‘A’ in Jaypur Reserve Forest and proceeds east through Point ‘B’ in Badakathia

Reserve Forest upto Point ‘C’ on Singada Nalla which is the eastern boundary of village Badahar.

C-D-E: The line starts from Point ‘C’ and proceeds along Singada Nalla through Point ‘D’ in village Banabaspur, then

along eastern and southern boundaries of village Parabeda, along southern boundary of village Kumunda upto

Point ‘E’.

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 24, 2022/ आज‍ वन 2, 1944

1753

E-F-A: The line starts from Point ‘E’ and proceeds through village Kumunda, through Point ‘F’ in Jaypur Reserve

Forest to meet at Point ‘A’.

[ F. No. 43015/11/2022-LA&IR]

RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Director

नई दिल्ली, 22 जसतम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 859.—केन्द्री सरकार, को ला िारक क्षेत्र (अिवन और जवकास) अजिजन म,1957 (1957 का 20) की

िारा 3 द्वारा प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, नीचे िी गई अनुसूची के स्ट् तंभ (2) में जवजनर्िव्‍ ट अजिकारर ों को, उक् त

अजिजन म के प्र ोिनों के जलए और उक् त अनुसूची के स्ट् तंभ (3), जवजनर्िव्‍ ट मेससव एनएमडीसी जलजमटेड, रजिस्ट्रीकषत

का ावल और मु्‍ ाल ,10-3-311/ए, जनि भवन, कजसल जिल् स, मासाब टैंक, िजिराबाि-500028, तेलंगाना और स्ट् ल

का ावल की अजिकाररता के भीतर आने वाले स्ट् तंभ (5) में जवजनर्िव्‍ ट का ों के संबंि में, उसके स्ट् तंभ (4) में की तत्‍ स्ट् ानी

प्रजवजष्ट में उि सक्षम प्राजिकारर ों के सामने ाजवजनर्िव्‍ ट िाराओं के उृबंिों के जलए सक्षम प्राजिकारी जन ुजि करती

िज:-

अनुसूची

क्रम

सं्‍ ा

सक्षम प्राजिकारी के प ृ में

जन ुक् त व् जि का ृिनाम

िासकी ृता

अजिजन म की िारा

सक्षम प्राजिकारी के

का व

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

1. का वकारी जनिेिक

2. मु्‍ मिाप्रबंिक

3. मिाप्रबंिक

4.उृ मिाप्रबंिक

5.सिा क मिाप्रबंिक

6. वरर्‍ प्रबंिक

7. प्रबंिक

मेससव एनएमडीसी

जलजमटेड, रजिस्ट्रीकषत

का ावल और मु्‍ ाल

10-3-11/ए, जनि भवन,

कजसल जिल् स, मासाब टैंक,

िजिराबाि,

-500028, तेलंगाना

और

स्ट् ल का ावल -

एनएमडीसी जलजमटेड,

िूसरा तल,िेएसएफसी

भवन, रांची,

जिला रांची, राज् -

झार ंड.

िारा 4 की

उृ-िारा (3)

(क) ृूवेक्षण को ला

के जलए भूजम में प्रवेि

और सवेक्षण करना;

( ) उृ मषिा में

ोिना

ा

वेिन

करना;

(ग) भूजम में को ला

के ृूवेक्षण के जलए

सभी आव‍ क का व

दक ा िाना;

(घ) भूजम की सीमाएं

जचजन्ित

करना

जिनमें ृूवेक्षण के

जलए प्रस्ट् ताजवत दक ा

िाना िज;

(ड.) ऐसी सीमाओं

और

ृंजि

को

जचजन्ित

करने

के

जलए

जचन् िों

को

लगाना;

(च) ििां सवेक्षण

ृूरा निीं दक ा िा

सकता िज और सीमाएं

त ा ृंजि जचजन्ित

दकए गए िैं, विां

दकसी ड़ी फसल,

1754

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPETEMBER 24, 2022/ASVINA 2, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

बाड़ ा िंगल के

दकसी भाग को कम

और साफ करना।

1. का वकारी जनिेिक

2. मु्‍ मिाप्रबंिक

3. मिाप्रबंिक

4.उृ मिाप्रबंिक

5.सिा क मिाप्रबंिक

6. वरर्‍ प्रबंिक

7. प्रबंिक

मेससव एनएमडीसी

जलजमटेड, रजिस्ट्रीकषत

का ावल और मु्‍ ाल

10-3-11/ए, जनि भवन,

कजसल जिल् स, मासाब टैंक,

िजिराबाि,

-500028, तेलंगाना

और

स्ट् ल का ावल -

एनएमडीसी जलजमटेड,

िूसरा तल,िेएसएफसी

भवन, रांची,

जिला रांची, राज् -

झार ंड.

िारा 6.

काररत िोने वाली

संभाव्

क्षजत

की

राजि ृर प्रजतकर

का संिा और केंद्री

सरकार को जववाि

जनर्िव्‍ ट करना।

को ला जन ंत्रक

को ला जन ंत्रक का

का ावल , 1, काउंजसल

िाउस स्ट् रीट, कोलकाता -

700 001.

िारा 8 की उृ-िारा

(2).

अिवन

के

जवप द्ध

आक्षेृों की सुनवाई

और केंद्री सरकार

को

ररृोटव

प्रस्ट् तुत

दक ा िाना।

1. का वकारी जनिेिक

2. मु्‍ मिाप्रबंिक

3. मिाप्रबंिक

4.उृ मिाप्रबंिक

5.सिा क मिाप्रबंिक

6. वरर्‍ प्रबंिक

7. प्रबंिक

मेससव एनएमडीसी

जलजमटेड, रजिस्ट्रीकषत

का ावल और मु्‍ ाल

10-3-11/ए, जनि भवन,

कजसल जिल् स, मासाब टैंक,

िजिराबाि,

-500028, तेलंगाना

और

स्ट् ल का ावल -

एनएमडीसी जलजमटेड,

िूसरा तल,िेएसएफसी

भवन, रांची,

जिला रांची, राज् -

झार ंड.

िारा 12.

िारा 13 की उृिारा

(5) और 5 (क).

िारा 13 की उृ-

िारा(6).

िारा 14 की उृ-

िारा(1).

व् जि ों को भूजम का

कब् िा

अ‍ र्ृवत

करने

और

उसका

कब्िा लेने के जलए

नोरटस।

भूजम त ा ृुनवावस

एवं ृुनवस्ट् ाृना के

प्रजतकर का

अविारण ।

क्षजत के जलए प्रजतकर

का संिा जिसका

अजिजन म में किीं

भी

उृबंि

निीं

दक ा ग ा िज।

करार द्वारा जन त

प्रजतकर का संिा ।

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 24, 2022/ आज‍ वन 2, 1944

1755

िारा 14 की उृ-

िारा(4).

िारा 16.

िारा 17.

िारा 19.

िारा 20 की उृ-

िारा(3).

िारा 21.

प्रजतकर के संबंि में

अजिकरण के समक्ष

क न।

अजिकरण के जनणव

ृर ब् ाि क संिा ।

प्रजतकर का संिा ।

केंद्री सरकार द्वारा

प्रत्‍ ा ोजित िजि ों

और

कतव् ों

का

ृालन करना।

केंद्री सरकार द्वारा

अृील की सुनवाई

करना

और

अृने

आिेि का जन्‍ कर्व

िेना।

िानकारी प्राप् त करने

की िजि।

1. का वकारी जनिेिक

2. मु्‍ मिाप्रबंिक

3. मिाप्रबंिक

4.उृ मिाप्रबंिक

5.सिा क मिाप्रबंिक

6. वरर्‍ प्रबंिक

7. प्रबंिक

मेससव एनएमडीसी

जलजमटेड, रजिस्ट्रीकषत

का ावल और मु्‍ ाल

10-3-11/ए, जनि भवन,

कजसल जिल् स, मासाब टैंक,

िजिराबाि,

-500028, तेलंगाना

और

स्ट् ल का ावल -

एनएमडीसी जलजमटेड,

िूसरा तल,िेएसएफसी

भवन, रांची,

जिला रांची, राज् -

झार ंड.

िारा 22.

दकसी भी संृजत्त में

प्रवेि

करने

और

जनरीक्षण करने की

िजि।

[ फा. सं. 43015/15/2022-एलएएण्डआईआर ]

राम जिरोमजण सरोि, जनिेिक

1756

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPETEMBER 24, 2022/ASVINA 2, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 22nd September, 2022

S.O. 859.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and

Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957), the Central Government hereby appoints the officers specified in column (2) of

the Schedule below to be competent authorities for the purposes of the said Act and for the provisions of sections as

specified against the said competent authorities in the corresponding entry in column (4) thereof, in respect of the

functions specified in column (5) falling within the jurisdiction of M/s NMDC Limited, Registered Office and Head

Office 10-3-311/A, Khanij Bhavan, Castle Hills, Masab Tank, Hyderabad – 500028, Telangana and the site office

specified in column (3) of the said Schedule.

SCHEDULE

Sr.

No.

Designation

person

appointed

Competent

Authority

Official Address

Section of the Act

Functions of the Competent

Authority

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

1.Executive Director

2.Chief General Manager

3. General Manager

4. Deputy General

Manager

5. Assistant General

Manager

6. Senior Manager

7. Manager

M/s NMDC Limited,

Regd. Office and HO

10-3-311/A,

Khanij

Bhavan, Castle Hills,

Masab

Tank,

Hyderabad-

500028,

Telangana

and

Site office – NMDC

Limited,

2^nd

floor,

JSFC

Bhavan, Ranchi

District – Ranchi

State - Jharkhand

Sub-section (3) of

section 4.

(a) To enter upon and

survey

the

land

for

prospecting coal;

(b) to dig or bore into the sub

soil;

prospect for coal in the land;

(d) to set out boundaries of the

land in which prospecting is

proposed to be done;

(e) to mark such boundaries

and line by placing marks;

and

(f) where survey cannot be

completed and the boundaries

and the line marked, to cut

down and clear away any part

of standing crop, fence or

jungle.

1.Executive Director

2. Chief General Manager

3. General Manager

4. Deputy General

Manager

5. Assistant General

Manager

6. Senior Manager

7. Manager

M/s NMDC Limited,

Regd. Office and HO

10-3-311/A, Khanij

Bhavan, Castle Hills,

Masab Tank,

Hyderabad- 500028,

Telangana

and

Site office – NMDC

Limited,

2^nd floor, JSFC

Bhavan, Ranchi,

District – Ranchi

State - Jharkhand

Section 6.

Payment of compensation on

amount of damage likely to be

caused and referring dispute to

the Central Government.

Coal Controller

Office of the

Controller, 1, Council

House Street, Kolkata-

70001.

Sub-section (2) of

section 8.

Hearing of objections against

acquisition and submitting of

report

the

Central

Government.

1. Executive Director

2. Chief General Manager

3. General Manager

M/s NMDC Limited,

Regd. Office and HO

10-3-311/A, Khanij

Bhavan, Castle Hills,

Masab Tank,

Hyderabad 500028,

Telangana.

Section 12.

Notice to persons to surrender

possession of land and take

possession thereof.

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 24, 2022/ आज‍ वन 2, 1944

1757

4. Deputy General

Manager

5. Assistant General

Manager

6. Senior Manager

7. Manager

and

Site office – NMDC

Limited,

2^nd floor, JSFC Bhavan

Ranchi

District – Ranchi

State - Jharkhand

Sub-sections (5)

and (5A) of

section 13.

Sub-section (6) of

Section 13.

Sub-section (1) of

section 14.

Sub-section (4) of

section 14.

Section 16.

Section 17.

Section 19.

Sub-section (3) of

section 20.

Section 21.

Determination of

compensation of land and

rehabilitation and resettlement

benefits.

Payment of compensation for

damages not provided

elsewhere in the Act.

Payment of compensation

fixed by agreement.

Statement before the Tribunal

regarding compensation.

Payment of interest on award

of the Tribunal

Payment of compensation.

To exercise the powers and

duties delegated by the Central

Government.

Giving the report during

hearing of Appeal by the

Central Government and the

finding of its order.

Powers to obtain information.

1. Executive Director

2. Chief General Manager

3. General Manager

4. Deputy General

Manager

5. Assistant General

Manager

6. Senior Manager

7. Manager

M/s NMDC Limited,

Regd. Office and HO

10-3-311/A,

Khanij

Bhavan, Castle Hills,

Masab

Tank,

Hyderabad

500028,

Telangana.

and

Site office – NMDC

Limited,

2^nd floor, JSFC Bhavan

Ranchi

District – Ranchi

State – Jharkhand.

Section 22.

Power to enter and inspect any

property.

[F. No. 43015/15/2022-LA&IR]

RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Director

1758

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPETEMBER 24, 2022/ASVINA 2, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ृेरोजल म और प्राकषजतक गजस मंत्राल

नई दिल्ली, 21 जसतम्बर, 2022

का. आ. 860 .— सरकारी स्ट् ान ( अप्राजिकषत अजिभोजग ों दक बेि ली ) अजिजन म 1971 (1971 का 40) के

ंड 3 द्वारा प्रित िजि ों। का प्र ोग करते हु े भारत के रािृत्र में प्रकाजित ृेरोजल म एवं प्राकषजतक गजस मंत्राल , भारत

सरकार की अजिसूचना का आ सं्‍ ा 842 दिनांक 20 मई, 2019 के अजिक्रमण में, केंद्र सरकार उत्‍कअजिजन ाम के

प्र ोिन के जलए सम्ृिा अजिकारी को एत्त्द्द्वरा सांजवजिक प्राजिकारी के समक्ष रैंक के अजिकारी को नीचे िी ग ी ताजलका के

अनुसार जन ुि करती िज, िो कज क लजतका के स्ट् ानी कॉलम 3 में इसी प्रजवजष्ट में जनर्िवष्ट सावविजनक ृररसर के संबंि में

अजिकार क्षेत्र की स्ट् ानी सीमाओं के भीतर उक्त्त अजिजन ाम के तित संृिा अजिकार के कतव्य

ों का ृालन करते हु े

प्रद्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करेगा

ताजलका

क्र.सं.

इकाई/का ावल का नाम

अजिकारी का ृिनाम

सरकारी ृररसर की श्रेजण ााँ एवं

क्षेत्राजिकार की स्ट् ानी सीमाएं

नुमालीगढ़

ररफाइनरी

जलजमटेड

श्री उज्जल न न िेंजण्डक,

मु्‍ प्रबंिक

(नगरबसती एवं संृिा) नुमालीगढ़

ररफाइनरी जलजमटेड, ृी ओ :

नुमालीगढ़ ररफाइनरी ृररसर,

जिला गोलाघाट 785699 असम

नुमालीगढ़

ररफाइनरी

जलजमटेड,

नुमालीगढ़ जिला गोलाघाट असम में

जस्ट् त

नुमालीगढ़

ररफाइनरी

जलजमटेड, के प्रिासजनक जन ंत्रण में

सभी ृररसर

[फा. सं. R-12041(11)/16/2017-OR-II/E-7909]

ृी. सोमाकुमार, अवर सजचव

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi, the 21st September, 2022

S.O. 860.—In exercise of the power conferred by section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Un-

authorized Occupants) Act-1971 (40 of 1971) and in supersession of the notification of the Government of India in the

Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas S.O. No 842 dated 20^th May,2019 the Central Government hereby appoints the

officer mentioned in the table below, being officer of equivalent rank of Statutory Authority, to be Estate Officer for

the purpose of the said Act, who shall exercise the powers conferred and perform the duties imposed on Estate Officer

by or under the said Act within the local limits of the jurisdiction in respect of the public premises specified in the Act

corresponding entry in the local column 3 of the said table.

TABLE

Sl. No.

Name

the

Unit/Office

Designation of the Officer

Categories of the Public premises

and local Limits of Jurisdiction

Numaligarh Refinery

Limited

Shri Ujjal Nayan Handique, Chief

Manager

(Township

Estate),

Numaligarh

Refinery

Limited.

PO:

Numaligarh Refinery Complex,

Dist Golaghat-785699 Assam

All

premises

under

the

administrative control of Numaligarh

Refinery

Limited

located

Numaligarh Dist. Golaghat, Assam

[F. No. R-12041(11)/16/2017-OR-II/E-7909]

P. SOMAKUMAR, Under Secy.

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 24, 2022/ आज‍ वन 2, 1944

1759

श्रम और रोिगार मंत्राल

नई दिल्ली, 19 जसतम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 861—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्री सरकार

आ ुि, दिल्ली नगर जनगम (उतरी), दिल्ली,के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री जवि ृाल,कामगार, के द्वारा दिल्ली

उद्यान कमवचारी संघर्व संघ, नई दिल्ली के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िवष्ट केन्द्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण- सि- श्रम न् ा ाल -

2 नई दिल्ली ृंचाट(संिभव सं्‍ ा 142/2020) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज,प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्द्री

सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉृी के सा 04.08.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. एल -42011/93/2020-आईआर(डी ू)]

डी.के.जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 19th September, 2022

S.O. 861.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 142/2020) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum

Labour Court - II New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation

to The Commissioner, North Delhi Municipal Corporation, Delhi, and Shri Vijay Pal, Worker, Through Delhi

Udhyan Karamchari Sangarsh Union, New Delhi, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the

Central Government on 04.08.2022.

[No. L-42011/93/2020-IR (DU)]

D.K.HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXUR

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL –CUM- LABOUR COURT-II, NEW DELHI

Present: Smt. Pranita Mohanty

ID.NO.142/2020

Shri Vijay Pal S/o Saradre Singh,

Rept. By Delhi Udhyan Karamchari Sangarsh Union,

B-40 , DDA Flat, Bulward Road, Delhi-110054

…Workman

Versus

North Delhi Municipal Corporation,

Through its commissioner, Civic Centre,

New Delhi.

….Management

AWARD

In the present case, a reference was received from the appropriate Government vide reference no.

L-42011/93/2020 (IR(DU) dated 21/09/2020 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of

the Act, for adjudication of a dispute, terms of which are as under:

“Whether the worker Sh. Vijay Pal S/o Sardare Singh represented through Delhi Udhyan Karamchari

Sangarh union vide letter dated 21.03.2017 against the management of North Delhi Municipal Corporation, is

entitled to pay and allowances of the post of driver and if yes, to what relief is he entitled and what direction

are necessary in this respect. ?”

In the reference order, the appropriate Government commanded the parties raising the dispute to file

statement of claim, complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses with this Tribunal within 15 days

of receipt of the reference order and to forward a copy of such statement of claim to the opposite parties involved in

the dispute. Despite directions so given, Claimant union opted not to file the claim statement with the Tribunal.

1760

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPETEMBER 24, 2022/ASVINA 2, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

On receipt of the above reference, notice was sent to the workman as well as the management. Neither the

postal article sent to the claimant, referred above, was received back nor was it observed by the Tribunal that postal

services remained unserved in the period, referred above. Therefore, every presumption lies in favour of the fact that

the above notice was served upon the claimant. Despite service of the notice, claimant opted to abstain away from the

proceedings. No claim statement was filed on his behalf. Thus, it is clear that the workman is not interested in

adjudication of the reference on merits.

Since the workman has neither put in his appearance nor has he led any evidence so as to prove his cause

against the management, this Tribunal is left with no choice, except to pass a ‘No Dispute/Claim’ award. Let this

award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for

publication.

PRANITA MOHANTY, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 19 जसतम् बर, 2022

का.आ. 862.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्री

सरकार मु्‍ सुरक्षा अजिकारी, रक्षा अनुसंिान एवं जवकास संग न, मेटकाफ िाउस, नई दिल्ली , के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध

जन ोिकों और श्री बी एस िजि ा ,कामगार , के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िवष्ट केन्द्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण- सि- श्रम

न् ा ाल -2 नई दिल्ली ृंचाट (संिभव सं्‍ ा 136/20) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज, प्रकाजित करती िज िो

केन्द्री सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉृी के सा 23.08.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. एल -42025/07/2022-23- आईआर (डी ू)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 19 September, 2022

S.O. 862.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 136/20) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour

Court -II New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to The

Chief Security Officer ,Defence Research and Development Organization, Metcalf House, New Delhi, and Shri B. S

Dahiya, Worker, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 23.08.2022.

[No. L-42025/07/2022-23-IR(DU)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL –CUM- LABOUR COURT-II, NEW DELHI

Present: Smt. Pranita Mohanty

ID.NO.136/20

Shri B. S Dahiya, S/o Sh. Ravi Datt Dahiya,

R/o Village & Post Office, Nahara, District-Sonipat,

Haryana-131103

…Workman

Versus

The Chief Security Officer

Defence Research and Development Organization,

Metcalf House, New Delhi-110054

…Management

AWARD

In the present case, a reference was received from the appropriate Government vide letter No.

ND.96(02)2020-ID-FOC-DY. CLC dated 01.07.2020 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of

Section 10 of the Act, for adjudication of a dispute, terms of which are as under:

“Whether the services of the workman Sh. B.S Dahiya has been terminated illegally by the management

and if so what relief is the workman entitled and what relaxation are necessary in this respect?”

In the reference order, the appropriate Government commanded the parties raising the dispute to file

statement of claim, complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses with this Tribunal within 15 days

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 24, 2022/ आज‍ वन 2, 1944

1761

of receipt of the reference order and to forward a copy of such statement of claim to the opposite parties involved in

the dispute. Despite directions so given, Claimant opted not to file the claim statement with the Tribunal.

On receipt of the above reference, notice was sent to the workman as well as the management. Neither the

postal article sent to the claimant, referred above, was received back nor was it observed by the Tribunal that postal

services remained unserved in the period, referred above. Therefore, every presumption lies in favour of the fact that

the above notice was served upon the claimant. Despite service of the notice, claimant opted to abstain away from the

proceedings. No claim statement was filed on his behalf. Thus, it is clear that the workman is not interested in

adjudication of the reference on merits.

Since the workman has neither put his appearance nor has he led any evidence so as to prove his cause

against the management, this Tribunal is left with no choice, except to pass a ‘No Dispute/Claim’ award. Let this

award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for

publication.

Date: 8^th April, 2022

PRANITA MOHANTY, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 19 जसतम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 863.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्री सरकार

आ ुि, दिल्ली नगर जनगम (िजक्षण), दिल्ली,के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री ले राि, कामगार, के द्वारा मिासजचव

एमसीडी िनरल मििूर ूजन न, नई दिल्ली के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िवष्ट केन्द्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण- सि- श्रम

न् ा ाल -2 नई दिल्ली ृंचाट (संिभव सं्‍ ा 92/2013) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज, प्रकाजित करती िज िो

केन्द्री सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉृी के सा 04.08.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. एल-42011/26/2013-आईआर(डी ू)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 19th September, 2022

S.O. 863.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 92/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum

Labour Court - II New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi (South),Delhi, and Shri Lekhraj, Worker, Through MCD General

Mazdoor Union, New Delhi, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on

04.08.2022.

[No. L-42011/26/2013-IR (DU)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II,

NEW DELHI

Present:

Smt. Pranita Mohanty,

Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-Cum-Labour

Court-II, New Delhi.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 92/2013

Date of Passing Award- 29.07.2022

Between:

Shri Lekh Raj,

S/o Late Ganesh Lal,

C/o Through MCD General Mazdoor Union,

1762

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPETEMBER 24, 2022/ASVINA 2, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Room No.95, Barracks No. 1/10, Jam Nagar House,

Shahjahan Road,

New Delhi-

…Workman

Versus

The Commissioner,

Municipal Corporation of Delhi (South)

9^th Floor, Civic Centre, Minto Road,

Delhi-110002.

…Management

Appearances:-

Shri B.K Prasad

For the claimant

(A/R)

Shri Rajiv Kumar Bhardwaj

For the Management

(A/R)

AWA D

The Government of India in Ministry of Labour & Employment has referred the present dispute existing

between employer i.e. the management of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (South), and its workman/claimant herein,

under clause (d) of sub section (1)and sub section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act 1947 vide letter

No. L-42011/26/2013 (IR(DU) dated 10/07/2013 to this tribunal for adjudication to the following effect.

“Whether the action of the management of MCD Delhi in not granting pay scale of Rs. 950-1500 w.e.f

20.04.1993 and revised from time to time alongwith all consequential benefits to workman Shri Lekh Raj S/o

Shri Late Ganesh Lal Officiating Chaudhary w.e.f 20.04.1993 is fair and justified? What relief the workman

is entitled to?”

This is a reference received from the appropriate government for adjudication if the denial by MCD in not

granting the pay scale at the rate of 950-1500 to the claimant i.e. 20.04.1993 for the post of Garden chaudary is fair

and justify.

As per the claim statement the claimant has joined the management as a Mali in the year 15/10/1991 as Mali

on daily wage basis in the pay scale of 750- 940. He was allotted the work of Garden Chaudhary i.e. 1993 by the

competent authority of Horticulure Department and was posted under Green Park, South Zone of MCD Delhi. Though

he is working in the said post of Garden Chaudhary from 20.04.1993 the management has denied him the pay scale of

Garden Chaudhary at the rate of 3050-4590 from that date. The post of Mali comes under unskilled category whereas

the post of Chaudhary is the skilled category under Group C of the employment. Repeated demand made by the

claimant for grant of proper pay scale as has been done in the case of Jai Chand vs. MCD and MCD vs. Sultan Singh

were not considered. Having no other efficacious remedy the claimant approach the Labour Commissioner through

the General Mazdoor Union where a conciliation was taken up. But for the adamant attitude of the management

conciliation failed and the matter has been referred for adjudication. In the claim petition the claimant has prayed that

a direction be given to the management to pay him the scale of Garden Chaudhary from 1993 i.e the date he started

officiating in the post of Garden Chaudhary in the pay scale of 950-1500.

The management when noticed appeared and filed the written statement. The main challenge of the

management is that the present dispute cannot be termed as Industrial Dispute since, the same has not been espoused

by the union having the majority no. of members. The other challenge is that the claimant had never performed the

duty of Garden Chaudhary and no order to that effect was ever issued by the competent authority of the management.

However the management has admitted that the claimant was appointed on daily wage basis in the year 1990 as Mali

and later on he was regularized on the same post in the pay scale of 750-940 (pre revised). There is a prescribe process

for promotion to the post of Garden Chaudhary and it is so done when there is a vacancy in the sanctioned post. The

said promotion is not automatic but subject to having requisite qualification and qualifying the trade test conducted by

the department. The claimant had never qualified the said trade test and the claim is based upon misconceived facts.

Thereby the management has prayed for dismissal of the claim petition.

On these rival pleadings the following issues are framed for adjudication.

ISSUES

1. Whether the action of the management MCD Delhi in not granting pay scale of 950-1500 w.e.f

20.04.1993 and revised the same from time to time with consequential benefit to the workman Shri Lekh

Raj S/o Late Ganesh Lal as the officiating Garden Chaudhary is justified and what would be the effect?

2. To what relief the workman is entitled to.

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 24, 2022/ आज‍ वन 2, 1944

1763

During the hearing the claimant testified as WW1and exhibited two documents and marked as

WW1/1 and WW1/2. The said documents include the office order by which the claimant was ordered to act

as the officiating Garden Chaudhary w.e.f 20.04.1993. The other document exhibited by the claimant is the

order dated 04.06.2013 issued by the Director Horticulture SDMC wherein all the deputy Director

Horticulture where directed to verify, examine the claim of the applicant regarding discharge of duty in the

higher post i.e. Garden Chaudhary and on verification if the claim is found to be genuine wage equal to the

pay attached to the post they actually worked be paid to them. Besides examining himself the claimant has

also examined the President of the MCD General Mazdoor Union as WW2 this witness proves three

documents marked as WW2/1 to WW2/3. These documents have been exhibited to disprove the allegation of

the management that the proceeding is not maintainable for want of espousal. Besides adducing oral and

documentary evidence through its witnesses the claimant has confronted several documents to the witness

examined by the management. On behalf of the management the Assistant Director Horticulture testified as

MW1. He also proved several documents marked as MW1/1 to MW1/2 disprove the stand of the claimant.

At the outset of the argument the Ld. A/R for the claimant submitted that the law is well settled that

equal remuneration should be paid for equal nature of work and denial of the same amounts to unfair labour

practice. Relying on the judgments of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in the case of MCD vs. Sultan Singh

decided in WPC NO. 7947 of 2010 which was later on upheld in the Hon’ble Supreme Court he submitted

that the division Bench of the Hon’ble High Court have held that the list issued by Zonal Horticulture

Department of MCD are the list issued by the competent authority and the persons whose name appear in the

said list are entitled to the pay attached to the post in which they are working as the Garden Chaudhary. He

thereby submitted that the name of the claimant Lekh Raj since appears at serial No. 35 of the list (WW1/1)

issued by the Zonal office, he is entitled for the scale attached to that post from 20.04.1993 and denial for the

same amounts to unfair labour practice. This argument of the A/R for the claimant has been rebutted on the

ground that the name of the claimant was never mentioned in any list of the officiating Garden Chaudhary

and the document marked as WW1/1 is not a document issued by the competent authority from a zonal office

of the management.

FINDINGS

ISSUE No.1 and 2

The claimant in his sworn testimony has stated that his initial appointment was in the year 1993 but

he was allotted the work of Garden Chaudhary w.e.f 20.04.1993 by the Competent Officer Horticulture

Department. Not only that he was deputed to the South Zone under the Green Park Area to work under the

Director of Horticulture and working as such since then. But he has been denied the pay scale of Garden

Chaudhary. To support his stand he has filed the document marked as WW1/1 which is an order issued by

the Deputy Director Horticulture middle Zone issued on 12.08.2004 indicating the list of officiating Garden

Chaudharies with reference to the date of their initial appointment and the date from which they are

officiating and the area they are working. In this list at serial no. 35 the name of the claimant appears. The

management has denied this document. The other document filed by the claimant is the letter dated

04.06.2013 issued by the Director of Horticulture and marked as WW1/2. By this letter the Director of

Horticulture has authorized the Deputy Directors to verify and issue the list of the persons working as

officiating Garden Chaudharies. Of course the order dated 4.6.2013 i.e. WW1/3 is with regard to the

claimants in the case of Sultan Singh and others vs. MCD. The witness examined by the management is not

none other than the Deputy Director of Horticulture. He has stated that the workman had never worked as the

Garden Chaudhary being assigned the said duty. The claim advanced by him is illegal. While filing the copy

of the recruitment rules the witness has stated that the workman has already been given the benefits of first

ACP and second ACP and thus he is not entitled to the claim and the benefits. During cross examination this

witness was confronted with the documents of the management which are the photocopies of the service

book of the claimant and the office order of transfer of the claimant wherein he has been described as Mali.

The claimant was cross examined at length by the management. But the witness remained firm in his stand

and denied to the suggestions that he is still working as a Mali and was never ordered by the competent

authority to officiate as Garden Chaudhary.

The issue whether the Malis directed by the Deputy Director Horticulture to officiate as Garden

Chaudhary and the entitlement of those officiating Garden Chaudharies have been decided by the Hon’ble

High Court of Delhi in the case of MCD vs. Sultan Singh WPC No. 7947 of 2010 wherein the Hon’ble

Court have held that the persons officiating when not claiming appointment to the post of Garden Chaudhary

but claiming the salary attached to the post for having worked on adhoc basis in that post are entitled to the

salary attached to the said post. The MCD had challenged the order of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in

SLP NO. 20069 of 2011 before the Hon’ble Supreme Court and the same was dismissed as withdrawn. On

1764

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPETEMBER 24, 2022/ASVINA 2, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

behalf of the claimant the judgment of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Jai Chand vs. MCD

CW6514 of 2001 has been filed wherein the Hon’ble Court have disapproved the action of the management

in not paying equal pay to the Garden Chaudharies officiating for taking the work from them for that post.

The order of the management pursuant to the order passed in the case of Jai Chand has been filed as annexure

B. thus, the claimant has categorically stated that the management is guilty of unfair Labour practice meted to

the claimant for not granting the pay scale of Garden Chaudhary to him from the date he started officiating in

the said post i.e. 20.04.1993. Accordingly it is held that the management is guilty of unfair labour practice

and the claimant is entitled to the pay scale of 950-1500 w.e.f 20.04.1993 and revision affected from time to

time alongwith all other consequential benefits attached to the said scale w.e.f 20.04.1993. The issue is

accordingly decided in the favour of the claimant. Hence, ordered.

ORDER

The reference be and the same is answered in favour of the workman. It is held that the claimant is

entitled to the pay scale admissible to Garden Chaudhary with effect from 20.04.1993, revision of the same

as has been done in case of the persons placed in similar footing and grant all other consequential benefits to

the claimant within 3 months from the date this award would become executable. The management is also

directed to pay the arrear of the differential salary to the claimant within a period of further 6 months from

the date of publication of the award failing which the amount accrued shall carry interest @9% from the date

of accrual and till the final payment is made. Send a copy of this award to the appropriate government for

notification as required under section 17 of the ID act 1947.

The reference is accordingly answered.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

29^th July, 2022

PRANITA MOHANTY, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 19 जसतम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 864.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्री सरकार

भारत संचार जनगम जलजमटेड,के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और बीएसएनएल, कजिुअल और कॉन्रजक्ट वकवसव ूजन न, के

बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िवष्ट केन्द्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण- सि- श्रम न् ा ाल -2 नई दिल्ली ृंचाट(संिभव सं्‍ ा

87/2018) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज,प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्द्री सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉृी के सा

07.09.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. एल-42025/07/2022-25-आईआर(डी ू)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 19th September, 2022

S.O. 864.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 87/2018) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum

Labour Court - II New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

The Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, and BSNL Casual and Contract workers Union, which was received along with

soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 07.09.2022.

[No. L-42025/07/2022-25-IR (DU)]

D.K.HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 24, 2022/ आज‍ वन 2, 1944

1765

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II,

NEW DELHI

Present:

Smt. Pranita Mohanty,

Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-Cum-Labour

Court-II, New Delhi.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 87/2018

Date of Passing Award- 23.08.2022

Between:

BSNL Casual and Contract workers Union (Regd.),

…Workman

Versus

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

…Management

Appearances:-

None for the claimant

For the claimant

(A/R)

Shri Atul Bhardwaj

For the Management

(A/R)

AWARD

This award is intended to dispose of the application filed u/s 33(1)(a) of the Id Act by the workman

as the claimant. Perusal of the record shows that the claimant has alleged in this application that a dispute

between him and the management is pending wherein the claimant has claimed the relief of regularization in

service by the management. Though, the management has appeared in the said proceeding and has full

knowledge about the same, in gross violation of the provisions of section 33 threatened to change the service

condition of the claimant and also gave out threatening to terminate his service. Being aggrieved the present

application was filed.

Notice of the application being served the management BSNL filed its reply stating that the present

proceeding is not maintainable as the same has been filed on an apprehended cause of action. While denying

employer and employee relationship between the parties the management has stated that the petition is liable

to be dismissed for want of cause of action as well as for false statement of the claimant.

It is evident from the record that after completion of the pleading the claimant was called upon to

adduce evidence. But no evidence was adduced and agreed by both the parties the matter was listed for

argument. Today no argument was advanced by the claimant.

The Ld. A/R Mr. Bhardwaj representing the BSNL oppose the claim of the claimant and submitted

that the entire application is based upon imaginary allegations and infact the claimant has no cause of action.

Admittedly the claimant except filing the application has not adduced any oral or documentary evidence to

support his stand. The claim petition contains a statement regarding the apprehension of the complainant of

termination for the industrial dispute pending. The claim petition has not disclosed the details and the number

of the industrial dispute pending between the parties. The management in its reply has denied about the

industrial dispute pending. The provision of law laid u/s 33 of the Id Act provides that during the pendency

of an industrial dispute before the labour court or tribunal, no employer shall in regard to any matter

connected with the said dispute alter to the prejudice of the workman concerned in such dispute, the

conditions of service applicable to them immediately before the commencement of such proceeding. Section

33A prescribes that if any such alteration in service condition as referred u/s 33 happens the person aggrieved

can agitate the matter before the labour court or tribunal who shall adjudicate upon the complaint as if it were

a dispute referred to or pending before it. On a plain reading of the provisions of section 33 and 33A thus,

leads to a conclusion that for invoking the provision the requirements are that an industrial dispute between

the parties must have been pending and during such pendency the employer changes the service condition of

the employee. But here is a case the claimant has not furnished the detail of the industrial dispute pending

between the parties. Not only that there is absolutely no evidence laid by the claimant to prove how his

1766

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPETEMBER 24, 2022/ASVINA 2, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

service condition was changed by the employer during the pendency of the proceeding. Hence, there being

no evidence on record it is held that the claimant has failed to prove the allegations made in the complaint

petition filed u/s 33 of the ID act. Hence, ordered.

ORDER

The complaint be and the same is dismissed on contest and answered against the complainant. Send

a copy of this award to the appropriate government for notification as required under section 17 of the ID act

1947.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

23rd August, 2022

PRANITA MOHANTY, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 19 जसतम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 865.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्री सरकार

मु्‍ , एनडीडीटीसी, एम्स, गाजि ाबाि, ( ूृी); मजससव सुृर ए रकॉन, नई दिल्ली; के.एस.एल इंटरप्राइिेि, िनकृुरी, नई

दिल्ली , के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री मुकेि, कामगार, के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िवष्ट केन्द्री सरकार औद्योजगक

अजिकरण- सि- श्रम न् ा ाल -2 नई दिल्ली ृंचाट(संिभव सं्‍ ा 86/2015) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा

िज,प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्द्री सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉृी के सा 30.08.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. एल -42012/111/2014-आईआर(डी ू)]

डी.के.जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 19th September, 2022

S.O. 865.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 86/2015) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum

Labour Court - II New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

The Chief, NDDTC, AIIMS, Ghaziabad, (U.P.);M/s Super Aircon,New Delhi ;K.S.L Enterprises, Janakpuri, New

Delhi and Shri Mukesh, worker which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on

30.08.2022.

[No. L-42012/111/2014-IR (DU)]

D.K.HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II,

NEW DELHI.

PRESENT:

Smt. Pranita Mohanty,

Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-Cum-Labour

Court-II, New Delhi.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 86/2015

Date of Passing Award- 08.08.2022

Between:

Shri Mukesh,

S/o Shri Rampal,

At:- Vill & PO- Panchali Khurd,

Baghpat Road,

Meerut (U.P)-250005.

… Workman

Versus

1. The Chief,

NDDTC, AIIMS,

Kamla Nehru Nagar,

Near Central Public School,

Ghaziabad, U.P.

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 24, 2022/ आज‍ वन 2, 1944

1767

2. M/s Super Aircon,

At- C-129, Pandav Nagar,

Behind Radha Krishna Temple,

New Delhi-110092.

3. K.S.L Enterprises,

Office At:- A-1/353,

Janakpuri, New Delhi.

…Managements

Appearances:-

Shri Arvind Kumar

For the claimant

(A/R)

Shri Vikrant Narayan

For the Management

(A/R)

AWARD

The Government of India in Ministry of Labour & Employment has referred the present dispute existing

between employer i.e. the management of NDDTC, AIIMS, and its workman/claimant herein, under clause (d) of sub

section (1)and sub section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act 1947 vide letter No. L-42012/111/2014

(IR(DU) dated 09/09/2014 to this tribunal for adjudication to the following effect.

“Whether the action of the management of NDDTC, AIIMS Ghaziabad, its contractor M/s KSL Enterprises

in terminating the services of workman Shri Mukesh S/o Shri Rampal w.e.f 17.12.2012 and nonpayment of

dues from May 2012 is is legal and justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?”

As per the claim statement the claimant was working in the premises of NDDTC, AIIMS Ghaziabad through

the contractor M/s KSL Enterprises and his service was illegally terminated w.e.f 07.12.2012 and his wage for the

months from May 2012 till the date of termination was not paid. During course of employment though he had worked

continuously for a period of 240 days in a calendar year preceding to his termination and the nature of work

discharged was perennial, the management No.1 never conferred temporary status on him. During course of

employment the management No.1 neither gave him letter of appointment nor extended the benefits of EPF and ESI

Act. The demand raise by the claimant for his legitimate dues perhaps irritated the management leading to his

termination. Being aggrieved he has raised a dispute before the labour commissioner where steps for conciliation were

taken. Since, the conciliation failed the appropriate government referred the matter to this tribunal. The claimant in the

claim petition has thus prayed for an award to be passed directing the management No.1 to reinstate the claimant into

service with back wages and to pay the arrear wage from May 2012 till the date of reinstatement.

Being noticed the management No.1 i.e. AIIMS appeared and filed WS denying the employer and employee

relationship with the claimant. It has been stated that the management AIIMS is not an industry and the claimant was

never employed by them. The management of AIIMS enters into the contract with different contractors for execution

of the work of Gardner/ Assistant Technician etc. the contractor is paid the amount as per the contract. The

engagement of the persons through the contractors terminates with the termination of the contract. At no point of time

the service of the claimant was terminated by the management No.1 nor any unfair labour practice was meted to him.

It has also been stated that the claimant has not stated specifically about the dates when he was inducted into the

service of the management No.1 and when his service was terminated. Thus, the management has pleaded for

dismissal of the claim as not maintainable. The claimant filed rejoinder reiterating stand taken.

On the rival pleading the following issues were framed for adjudication.

ISSUES

1. Whether the action of the management NDDTC, AIIMS Ghaziabad and its contractor KSL Enterprises is

termianting the service of workman Shri Mukesh S/o Rampal w.e.f 17.12.2012 and nonpayment of dues

from May 2012 is legal and justified.

2. If Not, what relief the workman is entitled?

The claimant testified himself as WW1 and relied upon the one document marked as WW1/1 which

is the complaint filed before the Labour Commissioner. On behalf of the management one Sanjay Kumar Jain

the Assistant Engineer Civil was examined as MW1. Both the witnesses were examined at length.

1768

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPETEMBER 24, 2022/ASVINA 2, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

FINDING

The reference has been received for adjudication to the effect if the termination of service of one Rampal is

legal and justified. But the claim has been filed one mukesh s/o Rampal. The management AIIMS and two contractors

have been made parties. Those two contractors did not appear and proceeded exparte. During the pendency the

claimant filed an application u/s 11(3) of the Act for a direction to the management for production of document. That

application was allowed and the management was directed to file attested copies of the documents prayed for giving

liberty to the claimant to adduce secondary evidence. As seen from the record neither the management produced the

documents nor the claimant adduced secondary evidence. The claimant tendered his affidavit as WW1 and the

management examined one witness as MW1. The claimant who testified as WW1 has stated that during the course of

employment the salary slip was not provided and the benefits of the EPF and ESI were not extended to him. No

attendance register for the work done by him was maintained nor I card was issued to him. During cross examination

the witness has stated that he is working against a permanent post and the duty was being assigned by the J.E. He has

made it clear that his employment was directly under the management No.1 and not under the contractor management

no.2 and 3. During cross examination though he has stated that his employment was from 1st January 2009 to

December 2012 as Gardner and he was working from 08.00A.M to 05.00 PM everyday till his termination in

December 2012 no document or prove has been placed on record to prove the same. No other oral or documentary

evidence to prove that the claimant was working in the premises of the management No.1 under its supervision and

control has been filed. The claimant has thus, miserably failed to discharge the burden in showing his employment

under the management No.1 and completion of 240 days in a calendar year which could have conferred temporary

status on him making it obligatory on the part of the employer to comply with the provisions of section 25F of the Id

Act. The management No.1 has taken a plea that the claimant was never employed by the management No.1. He

might have been engaged through the contractor. The management has taken a stand that the award cannot be passed

against the management. During cross examination of the management witness though several questions were put and

a letter issued by the management No.1 and marked as WW1/1 was confronted, the same no way proves that the

claimant was ever employed by the management and his service was illegally terminated by the management No.1.

There is absolutely no evidence on record to show that there exist employer and employee relationship between the

claimant and management No.1 and the service was illegally terminated. For want of proof the claim advanced by the

claimant is liable to be rejected. Hence, ordered.

ORDER

The claim be and the same is dismissed and the reference is accordingly answered. Send a copy of this award

to the appropriate government for notification as required under section 17 of the ID act 1947.

The reference is accordingly answered.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

08th August, 2022

PRANITA MOHANTY, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 19 जसतम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 866—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्री सरकार

दिल्ली, के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री ि प्रकाि, कामगार, के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िवष्ट केन्द्री सरकार औद्योजगक

अजिकरण- सि- श्रम न् ा ाल -2 नई दिल्ली ृंचाट(संिभव सं्‍ ा 85/2015) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा

[सं. एल -42012/121/2014-आईआर(डी ू)]

डी.के.जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 19th September, 2022

S.O. 866.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 85/2015) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum

Labour Court - II New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

The Chief, NDDTC, AIIMS, Ghaziabad, (U.P.);M/s Super Aircon,New Delhi ;K.S.L Enterprises, Janakpuri, New

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 24, 2022/ आज‍ वन 2, 1944

1769

Delhi and Shri Jai Prakash, worker which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government

on 30.08.2022.

[No. L-42012/121/2014-IR (DU)]

D.K.HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II,

NEW DELHI

PRESENT:

Smt. Pranita Mohanty,

Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-Cum-Labour

Court-II, New Delhi.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 85/2015

Date of Passing Award- 08.08.2022

Between:

Shri Jai Prakash,

S/o Shri Bharam Singh,

At- Village & Post Panchali Khurd,

Baghpat Road, Distt.,

Meerut (U.P)-250005.

… Workman

Versus

1. The Chief,

NDDTC, AIIMS,

Kamla Nehru Nagar,

Near Central Public School,

Ghaziabad, U.P.

2. M/s Super Aircon,

At- C-129, Pandav Nagar,

Behind Radha Krishna Temple,

New Delhi-110092.

3. K.S.L Enterprises,

Office At:- A-1/353,

Janakpuri, New Delhi.

…Managements

Appearances:-

Shri Arvind Kumar

For the claimant

(A/R)

Shri Vikrant Narayan

For the Management

(A/R)

AWARD

The Government of India in Ministry of Labour & Employment has referred the present dispute

existing between employer i.e. the management of NDDTC, AIIMS, and its workman/claimant herein, under

clause (d) of sub section (1)and sub section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act 1947 vide letter

No. L-42012/121/2014 (IR(DU) dated 15/09/2014 to this tribunal for adjudication to the following effect.

1770

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPETEMBER 24, 2022/ASVINA 2, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

“Whether the action of the management of NDDTC, AIIMS Ghaziabad, its contractor- M/s KSL Enterprises

in terminating the services of workman Shri Rampal w.e.f 17/12/2012 and nonpayment of dues from May

2012 is legal and justified? If Not, what relief the workman is entitled to?”

As per the claim statement the claimant was working in the premises of NDDTC, AIIMS Ghaziabad through the

contractor M/s KSL Enterprises and his service was illegally terminated w.e.f 07.12.2012 and his wage for the months

from May 2012 till the date of termination was not paid. During course of employment though he had worked