7236 GI/2022

(2381)

रजिस्ट्री सं. डी.एल. (एन) 04/0007/2003—05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

xxxGIDHxxx

xxxGIDExxx

प्राजिकार से प्रकाजित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप् ताजिक

WEEKLY

सं. 45]

नई दिल् ली, नवम् बर 6—नवम् बर 12, 2022, िजनवार/ कार्तिक 15—कार्तिक 21, 1944

No. 45] NEW DELHI, NOVEMBER 6—NOVEMBER 12, 2022, SATURDAY/KARTIKA 15— KARTIKA 21, 1944

इस भाग में जभन् न ृष्‍ सं्‍ ा िी िाती िज जिससे दक ि ृष क संकलन के प ृ में र ा िा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II— ण् ड 3—उृ- ण् ड (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्राल ों (रक्षा मंत्राल को छोड़कर) द्वारा िारी दकए गए सांजवजिक आिेि और अजिसूचनाएं

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

वाजिज् एवं उद्योग मंत्राल

(वाजिज् जवभाग)

नई दिल्ली, 3 नवम् बर, 2022

का.आ. 1119.—केन्री सरकार, जन ाित (गुिवत्ता जन ंत्रि एंव जनरीक्षि) अजिजन म, 1963 (1963 का

22) की िारा 7 की उृिारा (1) के सा ृठ त जन ाित (गुिवत्ता जन ंत्रि एंव जनरीक्षि) जन म, 1964 के जन म

12, के उृजन म (2) द्वारा प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, मजससि टीसीआरसी इंस्ट्ृेक्िन प्राइवेट जलजमटेड-

जविा ाृत्तनम ब्ांच, डोर नंबर 24‐1‐4, ृिला माला और िूसरा माला, रेरोदिट िाउस, ोम्प्सोंस स्ट्रीट वन

टाउन, ृुराि डाकघर, वाडि नबंर 25, ग्राम: जविा ाृत्तनम मंडल, जिला: जविा ाृत्तनम, जृन कोड 530001,

(जिसे एतद्ृश्चात उि अजभकरि किा िा ेगा), को इस अजिसूचना के रािृत्र में प्रकािन की तारी से तीन वर्ि

की अवजि के जलए, वाजिज् मंत्राल की िासकी रािृत्र में प्रकाजित भारत सरकार की अजिसूचना के सा

अनुसूची में जनर्िि्‍ ट दिनांक 20 दिसम्बर, 1965 की अजिसूचना की सं्‍ ा का.आ. 3975 त ा दिनांक 20 दिसम्बर,

1965 की अजिसूचना की सं्‍ ा का.आ. 3978 के तित प्रकाजित अजिसूचना में उृाबद्ध अनुसूची में जवजनर्ििष्ट

समूि-।, अ ाति लौि अ स्ट्क, और मैंगनीि अ स्ट्क और (समूि- II), अ ाति बजराइट्स को जन ाित से ृूवि जनम्नजलज त

सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-26112022-240608

CG-DL-W-26112022-240608

2382 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 12, 2022/KARTIKA 21, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ितों के अिीन जविा ाृत्तनम ृत्तन, गंगावरम ृत्तन और कष्‍िाृत्तनम ृत्तन में उक् त जनि और अ स्ट् क के

जनरीक्षि करने के जलए एक अजभकरि के रुृ में मान् ता िेती िज, अ ाित् :

(i)

ि अजभकरि, जनि और अ स्ट्क समूि-I का जन ाित (जनरीक्षि) जन म, 1965 त ा जनि

और अ स्ट्क समूि- II का जन ाित (जनरीक्षि) जन म, 1965 के जन म 4 के अिीन जनरीक्षि की

ृद्धजत की िााँच करने के जल े जन ाित जनरीक्षि ृठरर्ि् द्वारा जनजमत्त नामजनर्ििष्ट अजिकाठर ों को

ृ ािप्त सुजविाएं िेगी, और;

(ii)

ि अजभकरि, इस अजिसूचना में ा जवजनर्िि्‍ ट अृने का ो का जन्‍ ृािन करने के जलए,

जनिेिक (जनरीक्षि और गुिवत्ता जन ंत्रि) जन ाित जनरीक्षि ृठरर्ि द्वारा सम -सम ृर,

जलज त प ृ में, दिए गए जनिेिों से आबद्ध िोंगी ।

[िा. सं. के-16014/7/2022 - जन ाित जनरीक्षि]

एम. बालािी, सं ुि सजचव

MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY

(Department of Commerce)

New Delhi, the 3rd November, 2022

S.O. 1119.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 7 of the Export (Quality

Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 (22 of 1963) read with sub-rule (2) of rule 12 of the Export (Quality Control

and Inspection) Rules, 1964, the Central Government hereby recognises M/s TCRC Inspections Private Limited

- Visakhapatnam Branch, Door No : 24‐1‐4, 1st And 2nd Floor , Retrofit House , Thompsons Street One

Town Old Post Office, Ward ‐25, Village Visakhapatnam (U) Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, Pin Code ‐

530001 Andhra Pradesh, (hereinafter referred to as the said agency), as an agency for a period of three years

with effect from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette, for the inspection of Minerals

& Ores, (Group-I), namely, Iron Ore and Manganese Ore and (Group-II), namely, Barytes as specified, in the

Schedule annexed to the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Commerce, published in the

official Gazette vide number S.O. 3975, dated the 20th December, 1965, and S.O.3978 , dated the 20th

December, 1965 respectively, prior to export of the said Minerals and Ores at Visakhapatnam Port, Gangavaram

Port and Krishnapatnam port subject to the following conditions, namely: -

(i)

the said agency shall give adequate facilities to the officers nominated by the Export

Inspection Council in this behalf to carry out the inspection specified under rule 4 of the

Export of Minerals and Ores – Group I (Inspection) Rules, 1965 and Export of Minerals and

Ores – Group II (Inspection) Rules, 1965;

(ii)

the said agency, in performance of their function as specified in this notification shall be

bound by such directions, as the Director (Inspection and Quality Control), Export Inspection

Council may give, in writing from time to time.

[F. No. K-16014/7/2022-Export Inspection]

M. BALAJI, Jt. Secy.

जवद्युत मंत्राल

नई दिल्ली, 11 नवम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 1120.—केंरी सरकार, रािभार्ा (संघ के िासकी प्र ोिनों के जलए प्र ोग) जन म, 1976 के

जन म 10 के उृ जन म (4) के अनुसरि में जवद्युत मंत्राल के प्रिासजनक जन ंत्रिािीन ृावर जग्रड काृोरेिन ऑि

इंजड ा जलजमटेड के जनम्नजलज त का ािल ों, जिनके 80 प्रजतित कमिचारीवषंि ने हिंिी का का िसािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर

जल ा िज, को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजचत करती िज:

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 12, 2022/कार्तिक 21, 1944

2383

ृावर जग्रड काृोरेिन ऑि इंजड ा जलजमटेड,

400/220/132 केवी िी आई एस रंगृो उृकेंर,

ृोस्ट्ट-मामररंग, रंगृो चेक ृोस्ट्ट,

िजक्षि जसदिम-737132

ृावर जग्रड काृोरेिन ऑि इंजड ा जलजमटेड,

400 केवी बिरमृुर उृकेंर,

िजक्षिग्राम, ृलसंडा मोड़,

नवग्राम, मुर्ििाबाि,

ृजश्चम बंगाल-742238

[िा. सं. 11011/06/9/2022-हिंिी]

जितेि िॉन, आर् िक सलािकार (प्रभारी रा.भा.)

MINISTRY OF POWER

New Delhi, the 11th November, 2022

S.O. 1120.— In pursuance of Sub Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official

Purpose of the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notify the following offices of Power Grid

Corporation of India Limited under the administrative control of Ministry of Power, where 80% of the staff have

acquired working knowledge of Hindi:

Power Grid Corporation of India Limited,

400/220/132 KV GIS Rangpo Substation,

Post-Mamring, Rangpo Check Post,

South Sikkim: 737132

Power Grid Corporation of India Limited,

400 KV Berhampore Substation,

Dakshingram, Polsonda More,

Navagram, Murshidabad,

West Bengal- 742238

[F. No. 11011/06/9/2022-Hindi]

JITHESH JOHN, Economic Advisor (In-Charge O.L.)

श्रम और रोिगार मंत्राल

नई दिल्ली, 11 िुलाई, 2022

का.आ. 1121.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1047 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरि में,

केन्री सरकार जनिेिक,जवज्ञान इंडस्ट्रीि जलजमटेड,तठरकेर, के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और अध् क्ष,कनािटक

कॉिी क् ोररंग एंड िनरल वकिसि ूजन न, कनािटक, के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्ििष्ट केन्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरि-

सि- श्रम न् ा ाल -1 नई दिल्ली ृंचाट (संिभि सं्‍ ा 06/2021) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज,

प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्री सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉृी के सा 08.07.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. एल-42011/72/2021-आईआर-(डी ू)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

2384 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 12, 2022/KARTIKA 21, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 21st October, 2022

S.O. 1121.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 06/2021) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum

Labour Court – I New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in

relation to The Director, Vignyan Industries Limited, Tarikere and The President, Karnataka Coffee Curing and

General Workers Union, Karanata, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central

Government on 08.07.2022.

[No. L-42011/72/2021- IR (DU)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIUBNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

BANGALORE

DATED

19^th MAY 2022

PRESENT

DIPTI MOHAPATRA

Presiding Officer (i/c)

Camp Court, Bengaluru

C R No. 06/2021

I Party

II Party

The President, Karnataka Coffee Curing and

General Workers union, Tamil Colony,

Chikmagalur – 577 101.

The Director,

Vignyan Industries Limited,

TARIKERE – 577 228.

Appearances:

I Party :

Workmen

II Party :

Ramesh Babu,

Head of VIL

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide order No. 42011/72/2021-IR(DU) dated 27.08.2021

in exercise of the power conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred as “The Act”) (14 of 1947) referred the following Industrial

Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of Sh. Raju S K and 10 others (list attached) raised through Karnataka Coffee

Curing and General Workers Union vide letter dated 11.02.2021 for regularization of their services by

the management of M/s. Vignyan Industries Limited Tarikere with effect from the date mentioned

against each in letter dated 11.02.2021, and grant all consequential benefits from the date of

entitlement is proper, legal and justified? If yes, to what relief the disputants are entitled to? What

other directions, if any, are necessary in the matter?”

A little reference to the back drop needs mention that after receipt of the reference from the appropriate

government taken to file and registered as C R No. 06/2021. Due notices were issued to both the parties for

appearance and present their case fixing the date to 03.01.2022. On that day none of the parties appeared

resulting further adjournment to 11.03.2022. In between on 24.01.2022 all the 11 members of the 1st Party

Union as per the schedule were present along with Manager – HR of the 2nd Party made their appearance and

filed a Joint Memo enclosed with the Copy of Settlement executed by the parties dated 29.09.2021 regarding the

fact that they have resolved their dispute before the Conciliation Officer. The signatures of all the 11 members

of the 1st Party and Manager-HR were obtained. The case was listed for hearing of both parties during the camp

court held on 18.05.2022.

While sitting to adjudicate the matter in hand it is found that the parties elaborately discussed the fact

leads to their settlement. The Joint Memo is reproduced as follows:

“1) The above dispute raised by I Party is for and on behalf of 1. Shri Raju S K, 2. Shri Vinay

Kumar M 3. Shri Shrinath Naik T P 4. Shir Umesh M 5. Shri Naveen B M 6. Shri Naveen Kumar

B 7. Shri Hareesha T R 8. Shri Girish N T 9. Shri Girisha S 10. Shri Mohan D &

11. Shri Pradeepoa P (the Applicants), who were members of the I Party Union, praying to

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 12, 2022/कार्तिक 21, 1944

2385

regularize the services by the II Party and to grant all consequential benefits from the date of

entitlement. Having failed the conciliation, the Government of India referred the dispute for

adjudication to this Hon’ble Tribunal vide reference letter dated 27.08.2021 and the same is

pending in the above reference.

2) The II Party is under voluntary liquidation and the same has been approved by Cabinet

committed on Economic Affairs (CCEA), Govt. of India and Notices as required under Industrial

Disputes Act 1947, were served on all the stake holders. The II party has appointed the liquidator

and the winding up and closu7re of the establishment of VIL is in progress and also is in the

process of settlement of employee related issued.

3) The II Party and recognized Union of the II party i.e Vignyan Industries Mazdoor Sangh

(VIMS) had discussions regarding resolving all the employee related issued and in the meeting held

on 23.09.2021 settlements had been reached. Consequently, the Parties had entered into a

Memorandum of Settlement (MoS) dated 29.09.2021 under Section 12(3) r/w 18(3) of the Industrial

Disputes Act in the presence of Conciliation Officer and Asst. Labour Commissioner (C),

Mangaluru. As per the said MoS, VIMS had requested the Management for providing

employment in BEML for the Applicants herein and Management had agreed to look into the

same. As per the said MoS, the entire disputes between the parties were fully and finally settled.

Further, the parties had mutually agreed that no dispute would be raised in future on terms settled

and agreed to withdraw the court cases / litigations initiated by them against the II Party to enable

the II Party to complete the terms of settlement. A copy of the said MoS dated 29.09.2021 is

produced herewith and marked as Annexure-A.

4) The Applicants herein had adopted the said MoS and undertaken to abide by the terms of MoS.

In terms of the MoS, the Applicants have been given employment in BEML. As a consequence, the

dispute raised in the above said reference has become non-est and infructuous.

5) In view of the facts stated above, the Applicants herein have voluntarily filed their individual

applications dated 05.10.2021 before this Hon’ble Tribunal praying to delete their names from the

party array / dispute and submitted that they have withdrawn their membership from the I Party

Union and enclosed their letter of resignation from the I Party Union. Copies of the said

withdrawal letters dated 05.10.2021 submitted by the Applicants herein are produced and marked

as Annexure-B.

6) Since the disputes raised by the Applicants herein have been settled, there is no need to continue

with the above reference any longer.

7) Therefore, the Applicants herein and II Party most respectfully prays that this Hon’ble Court

may be pleased to take this Joint Memo on record and dismiss the dispute as settled out of court

and to pass such other orders as may be deemed fit in the interest of justice and equity.”

The Memorandum of Settlement under Section 12(3) r/w 18(3) of ID Act since enclosed with the Joint

Memo is taken into Judicial Consideration. The Form H speaks about the short recital of the case, the second

page discloses the terms of the settlement arrived by both the parties. It reveals that the 1st Party voluntarily

entered into the settlement which was found to have been executed before the Conciliation Officer. Besides the

1st Party members expressed that they have no further claim as against the 2nd Party in view of the settlement

dated 29.09.2021.

Since all the 1st party workmen (11 members) reported withdrawal of membership from the Union and

agreed upon the settlement, eventually there exist no Industrial Dispute between the parties for adjudication as

referred.

AWARD

The reference is answered accordingly. The ID case stands dismissed in terms of the Settlement

dated 29.09.2021.

DIPTI MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer (i/c)

ubZ fnYyh] 9 flrEcj] 2022

—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]dsUnzh; ljdkj

साऊ ईस्ट्टनि कोलिील्ड जलजमटेड ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa Je U;k;ky; जबलासृुर (छ.ग.) ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 02@2016½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gSA

[la

,y-22012@18@2016-vkbZ-vkj ¼lh,e-II½]

jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo

2386 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 12, 2022/KARTIKA 21, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 9th September, 2022

S.O. 1122.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 02/2016) of the Labour Court Bilashpur(CG) as shown in

the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of South Eastern Coalfield Limited and their

workmen.

[No. L-22012/18/2016– IR (CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.

अनुबंि

न् ा ाल -श्रम न् ा ािीि, अंतगित औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म श्रम न् ा ाल , जबलासृुर (छ.ग.)

(ृी ासीन-ििाबुद्दीन कुरजिी)

प्रक.क्र-02/आई.डी.एक्ट/ठरि./सी.िी.आई.टी./2016

संजस्ट् त दिनांक- 07.04.2016

ईश्वर हसंि चंिेल

कजजि र, आर.सी.एम.सी. एण्ड

सेक्रेटरी एन.एि.आई.टी. ू. सीृत रोड

जिला जबलासृुर छत्तीसगढ़ 495006

…प्र म ृक्ष

बनाम

दि चीि मजनेहिंग डा रेक्टर

साऊ ईस्ट्टनि कोलिील्ड जलजमटेड

एस.ई.सी.एल. एच.क् ू. सीृत रोड,

जिला जबलासृुर 495006

…जद्वती ृक्ष

प्र म ृक्ष द्वारााः

श्री िीृक िा सवाल प्रजतजनजि

जद्वती ृक्ष द्वारााः

श्री मनीर् श्रीवास्ट्तव वठरष्ठ प्रबंिक

अजिजनिि

(ृाठरत दिनांक-11.07.2022)

इस अजिजनिि के द्वारा प्र म ृक्षकार ईश्वर हसंि चंिेल और जद्वती ृक्षकार चीि मजनेहिंग डा रेक्टर

एस.ई.सी.एल. के बीच औद्योजगक जववाि जवद्यमान िोने के कारि, सेक्िन आदिसर, गवनिमेंट आि इजण्ड ा/भारत

सरकार, जमजनस्ट्री आि लेबर/श्रम न् ा ाल नई दिल्ली ने आिेि नं. एल-22012/18/2016-आई.आर.-(सी.एम.-॥)

नई दिल्ली दिनांक 02.05.2016 के द्वारा जववाि को, औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म 1947 (14/1947) के अंतगित,

श्रम न् ा ाल जबलासृुर को अजिजनर्िि ा ि सौृा िज, जिसकी अनुसूची इस प्रकार िजाः- Whether the action on the

part of management to provide check off system to 4 nos. of recognized trade unions namely Sanyukta Koyla

Mazdoor Sangh (AITUC), Koyla Mazdoor Sabha (HMS), Bhartiya Mazdoor Sangh (BMS), South Eastern

Koyla Mazdoor Congress (INTUC) & not extending check off facility to RLMC (NFITU) & withholding the

subscription amount and keeping in the custody of SECL management to the tune of Rs 72 Lakhs approximately

is legal, appropriate and justified ? If not, what relief the concerned union is the dispute is entitled to ? का

जनराकरि दक ा िा रिा िज ।

प्र म ृक्ष की ओर से प्रस्ट्तुत स्ट्टेटमेंट आि क्लेम का संजक्षप्त जनवेिन ि िज दक अनावेिक एस.ई.सी.एल. में

चार श्रजमक संघों को, चेक आि की सुजविा िे रिा िज त ा आर.सी.एम.सी. भी ृंिीकषत ूजन न िज । संजविान की

िारा 14, 16, 10 का उल्लंघन कर भेिभाव ृक्षृात कर रिा िज, िो आई.डी.एक्ट की िारा-2 आर.ए. के तित

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 12, 2022/कार्तिक 21, 1944

2387

िण्डनी िज । भारत सरकार द्वारा िो अनूसूची प्रेजर्त दक ा ग ा िज, उसमें िो अलग अलग जववाि िज । एस.ई.सी.एल.

भारत सरकार की कम्ृनी िज, िो संजविान के अनुच्छेि 12 के अंतगित राज् के अंतगित आती िज । कम्ृनी के

तात्कालीन कमिचारी रािेश् ाम िो िी.एम. आई.आर. त ा िो ािडी कर, अृने ृि का िुरुृ ोग कर, िजक्स कर

दि ा ा । उि् िजक्स मजसेि को न् ा ाल द्वारा QUSH दक ा ग ा ा, जिसमें प्रबंिन सुप्रीम कोटि गई ी ।

माननी उच्च न् ा ाल ने आिेि को स्ट्टेटस र ा िज । प्रबंिक उि मामले से िमेिा गुमराि करती रिी िज दक मामला

सबज् ूजडजि ल िज । न् ा ाल द्वारा चेक आि जसस्ट्टम न दि ा िा े । इंटक के अध् क्ष संिीव रेड्डी के किने से दक

इंटक की सम्बद्घता समाप्त िो गई िज, इसजलए चेक की ृात्रता निीं िज । एस.ई.सी.एल./कोल इंजड ा के अजिकारी

अृने िी प्रचजलत जनिि को इस प्रकरि में लागू निीं कर, भेिभाव व ृक्षृात कर रिे िैं, िाेे आई.ृी.सी. की िारा

166-167 के तित िण्डनी िज । इंटक एक अलग ूजन न िज, िो क्रेहनंग लेन दिल्ली में रेड ूजन न एक्ट के तित

2007 मे ृंिीकषत हुई िज । िमारे द्वारा चार ूजन न को चेक आि िेना त ा सेम एण्ड सीजमलर ूजन न को न िेना

अलग जववाि िज । प्रजतद्वंिी ूजन न इंटक एस.ई.सी.एल. के किने से आर.सी.एम.सी. के सिस्ट् ों द्वारा भरे ग े

आृिन िामि में काटी गई रकम 75 ला रुृ े को अृने ृास र कर कम्ृनी, बैंक ब् ाि एवं जबिनेस में उृ ोग

कर प्रजतवर्ि लाभ कमा रिी िज । िूसरी ओर आर् िक ृंगू बनाकर कम्ृनी के जवरुद्घ लंजबत प्रकरिों में एडवोकेट न र

सके, ूजन न के का ि बाजित िो सके । ूजन न द्वारा उृरोि गजरकानून कषत् की िांच करने को ला मंत्राल को

आवेिन दक ा ा । तात्कालीन सी.एम.डी. जनिेिक कार्मिक िी.एम.आई.आर. के जवरुद्घ आृराजिक प्रकरि करने

ठरृोटि डाली ी त ा दक्रजमनल जसजवल प्रकरि िा र करने नोठटस दि ा ग ा ा, उच्च न् ा ाल ने जनिि ूजन न

के ृक्ष में दि ा ा, जिसमें को ला मंत्राल को 72 ला रुृ े का भुगतान करने का आिेि दि ा िज । अनावेिक ने

भारत सरकार के कोड आि जडजसप्लीन से जमलते िुलते नाम से कोड आि कंडक्ट बना जल ा िज, िो ृूििताः

असंवजिाजनक एवं गजर कानूनी िज । अताः प्र म ृक्ष की ओर से प्रस्ट्तुत आवेिन ृत्र को स्ट्वीकार दक े िाने की कषृा की

िावें ।

जद्वती ृक्ष की ओर से स्ट्टेटमेंट आि क्लेम का जवरोि कर, िवाब ृेि करते हुए ि जनवेिन दक ा िज दक

आवेिक द्वारा प्रस्ट्तुत स्ट्टेटमेंट आि क्लेम संिभि तथ् ों के अनुरुृ वििन निीं िज, इसजलए अनुतोर् दि ा िाना

न् ा ोजचत निीं िज । संिर्भित अनुसूची में आवेिक आर.सी.एम.सी. (एनएिआईटी ू.) ििि िज, िबदक स्ट्टेटमेंट आि

क्लेम को उि ूजन न के द्वारा प्रस्ट्तुत निीं दक ा ग ा िज । एस.ई.सी.एल. में चेक आि जसस्ट्टम का प्राविान कोड

आि कंडक्ट के तित प्रबंिन एवं केन्री श्रम संग न से सम्बद्घता र ने वाले श्रम संघ के प्रजतजनजि द्वारा दिनांक

03.08.1994 को जनर्मित दक ा ग ा ा । कोड आि कंडक्ट के अंतगित िो केन्री श्रम संग न िाजमल हुए िैं, वे

इंटक, एचएमएस, बीएमएस, एटक एवं सीटू श्रमसंघ िज । एन.एि.आई.टी. ू. से सम्बद्घता र ने वाले कोई संग न

इसमें िाजमल निीं िज । केन्री संग न इंटक से सम्बद्घता र ने वाले आर.सी.एम.सी. ूजन न िो वर्ि 2006 में चेक

आि जसस्ट्टम के अंतगित कमिचाठर ों के वेतन से सिस्ट् ता िुल्क की कटौती दक ा ग ा ा, उि ूजन न के आंतठरक

जववाि के कारि कटौती राजि संबंजित ूजन न के बैंक ाते में उि वर्ि निीं िमा दक े िाने के संबंि में आवेिक

ूजन न आर.सी.एम.सी., (एन.एि.आई.टी. ू.) को न िेकर रोककर र ने का जनिि जल ा ग ा । केन्री सरकार

द्वारा संिर्भित अनुसूची में 75 ला राजि के संबंि में उल्ले िज दक जिसके संिर्भित जववरि व िस्ट्तावेि आवेिक

ूजन न आर.सी.एम.सी. (एन.एि.आई.टी. ू.) द्वारा प्रस्ट्तुत निीं दक ा ग ा िज ।

जद्वती ृक्ष की ओर से आगे ि भी अजभवचन दक ा ग ा िज दक उि् जववाि भारत संघ समस्ट्त मंत्राल

द्वारा अृने आिेि दिनांक 02.05.2016 के माध् म से िेड्युल के तित प्रकरि न् ा जनिि न िेतु प्रेजर्त दक ा ग ा

िज । आवेिक श्रम संघ के रेड ूजन न एक्ट के तित ृंिीकषत श्रमसंघ निीं िज और न िी ृंिी न सं्‍ ा 22 से संबंजित

जववाि माननी उच्च न् ा ाल छत्तीगसगढ़ जबलासृुर में लंजबत िज । ृंिी न सं्‍ ा 22 से संबंजित जववाि माननी

उच्च न् ा ाल जबलासृुर के समक्ष डब्ल् ु.ृी. 3393/2005 भागवत प्रसाि िुबे एवं अन् जवरुद्घ ृंिी क श्रम संघ

एवं अन् लंजबत िज । राजि के भुगतान के संबंि में सिी व्यजि/श्रम संघ का जनिािरि निीं िोने के कारि चेकअृ

जसस्ट्टम के अंतगित काटी गई राजि का भुगतान निीं दक ा ग ा िज और न िी अनावेिक द्वारा भेिभाव/ृक्षृात दक ा

िा रिा िज । िजक्स आडिर के जवरुद्घ माननी उच्च् न् ा ाल मध् प्रिेि िबलृुर में जडजविन बेंच द्वारा ृाठरत जनिि

2388 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 12, 2022/KARTIKA 21, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

के संिभि में माननी सवोच्च न् ा ाल के एस.एल.ृी. िो जसजवल अृील में ृठरवर्तित िो ग ा िज, लंजबत िज, जिसके

संबंि में आवेिन एवं िस्ट्तावेि माननी न् ा ाल के समक्ष दिनांक 09.08.2017 को प्रस्ट्तत दक ा ग ा िज ।

माननी सवोच्च न् ा ाल द्वारा उि प्रकरि ृर आिेि की जतज ृर चेक आि िेजसजलटी आवेिक ूजन न को न

दि े िाने की िो जस्ट् जत िज, वि अगले आिेि तक बरकरार र ने िेतु जनिेजित दक ा ग ा िज । संबंजित ूजन न के

आंतठरक जववाि के कारि िी सिस्ट् ता िुल्क की कटौती राजि उि अवजि में भुगतान निीं दक ा िा सका एवं

ृरवती अवजि में भी चेक आि जसस्ट्टम को लेकर न् ा ाल ीन प्रकरि िो माननी सवोच्च न् ा ाल में जसजवल

अृील के रुृ में लंजबत िज एवं ृंिी न क्रमांक-22 से संबंजित जववाि को लेकर प्रकरि माननी उच्च न् ा ाल

जबलासृुर में लंजबत िज, उि कारिों से उि राजि का भुगतान निीं दक ा िा सका िज । आवेिक द्वारा स्ट्व ं स्ट्वीकार

दक ा ग ा िज दक उसका संबंि इंटक िेडरेिन से ा ृरन्तु उसमें ि उल्ले निीं िज दक दकस अवजि तक उनका इंटक

िेडरेिन से संबंि ा एवं दकस जतज से इंटक से िटा े ग े िज । आवेिक कम्ृनी द्वारा चेक आि जसस्ट्टम में श्रम संघ

की सिस्ट् ता िुल्क कमिचारी के वेतन से इकाई स्ट्तर ृर काटी िाती िज एवं ूजन न के बैंक ाता में इकाई/क्षेत्री

स्ट्तर में संकलन ृश्चात भुगतान दक ा िाता िज । आवेिक ूजन न द्वारा िावा राजि की ब् ौरा, इकाईवार सिस्ट् ता

सूची, बैंक ाता का जववरि एवं ूजन न द्वारा बैंक ाता संचाजलत करने की ृिाजिकाठर ों के संबंि में कोई जनिि

िावा वर्ि 2006 से आि दिनांक तक संलग्न निीं दक ा ग ा िज । एस.ई.सी.एल. के मजनेिमेंट द्वारा प्र म ृक्ष को

वतिमान एवं भजव्‍ िेतु चेक आि की सुजविा एस.ई.सी.एल. के ृत्र क्रमांक एस.ई.सी.एल./बी.एस.ृी./आई.आर./

चेक आि/एस.सी/22/75 दिनांक 02.04.2022 के माध् म से प्रिान की िा चुकी िज और वतिमान में जद्वती ृक्ष एवं

आरसीएमसी के बीच चेक आि के संबंि में कोई जववाि लंजबत निीं िज । अताः प्र म ृक्ष द्वारा प्रस्ट्तुत स्ट्टेटमेंट आि

क्लेम (आवेिन ृत्र) जनरस्ट्त दक े िाने की कषृा की िावें ।

सेक्िन आदिसर, गवनिमेंट आि इजण्ड ा/भारत सरकार, जमजनस्ट्री आि लेबर/श्रम न् ा ाल नई दिल्ली के

द्वारा आिेि नं. एल-22012/ 18/2016-आई.आर.-(सी.एम.-॥) नई दिल्ली दिनांक 02.05.2016 के द्वारा

जनम्नजलज त अनुसूची को वाि प्रश्न के रुृ में संिर्भित की गई िज, जिसका जनराकरि जन्‍कर्ि सजित मेरे द्वारा

जनम्नांदकत रुृ से दक ा िा रिा िज ।

क्र.

अनुसूची / वाि प्रश्न

जन्‍कर्ि

Whether the action on the part of management to provide check off

system to 4 nos. of recognized trade unions namely Sanyukta Koyla

Mazdoor Sangh (AITUC), Koyla Mazdoor Sabha (HMS), Bhartiya

Mazdoor Sangh (BMS), South Eastern Koyla Mazdoor Congress

(INTUC) & not extending check off facility to RLMC (NFITU) ?

"िॉं"

"उि सुजविा प्रिान की िा चुकी

िज"

Withholding the subscription amount and keeping in the custody of

SECL management to the tune of Rs 72 Lakhs approximately is legal,

appropriate and justified ? If not, what relief the concerned union is

the dispute is entitled to ?

"निीं"

अनुसूची/वाि प्रश्न क्रमांक-1 का जन्‍कर्ि

समुजचत सरकार के समक्ष प्रस्ट्तुत जववाि िाने ृर श्रम मंत्राल द्वारा दिनांक 02.05.2016 को िो

अनुसूची/वाि प्रश्न जनर्मित कर इस न् ा ाल को प्रकरि ठरिर दक ा ा त ा न् ा ाल द्वारा िोनों वाि प्रश्न ृर

जवचार दक ा िा रिा ा, इसी िौरान जद्वती ृक्ष द्वारा अृने िवाब िावा में ि संिोिन दक ा ग ा दक जद्वती

ृक्ष द्वारा प्र म ृक्ष को वतिमान एवं भजव्‍ िेतु दिनांक 02.04.2022 के ृत्र के माध् म से चेक आि की सुजविा

प्रिान कर िी गई िज त ा वतिमान में प्र म ृक्ष एवं जद्वती ृक्ष के प्रकरि में चेक आि की जववाि लंजबत निीं िज ।

प्र म ृक्ष द्वारा इसके जवृरीत कोई तथ् निीं ला ा ग ा िज । इसके अलावा प्र म ृक्ष ईश्वर हसंि ने अृने

प्रजतृरीक्षि की कंजडका-20 में ि स्ट्वीकार दक ा िज दक दिनांक 02.04.2022 को प्र म ृक्ष अ ाित राष्ट्री कालरी

मििूर कांग्रेस को जद्वती ृक्ष के द्वारा चेक आि की सुजविा प्रिान कर िी गई िज । साक्षी ने उसे प्रििि डी-1 के रुृ में

स्ट्वीकार दक ा िज । जद्वती ृक्ष के साक्षी मनीर् श्रीवास्ट्तव द्वारा भी उि चेक आि की सुजविा प्र म ृक्ष को दि ा

िाना बता ा िज । उि समस्ट्त तथ् ों से ि िर्िित िोता िज दक अनुसूची/ वाि प्रश्न क्रमांक-1 के संबंि में वतिमान में

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 12, 2022/कार्तिक 21, 1944

2389

उभ ृक्षों के मध् कोई जववाि लंजबत निीं िज । अताः ऐसी ििा में वाि प्रश्न क्रमांक-1 का जन्‍कर्ि न केवल "िॉं" में

बजल्क "उि सुजविा प्रिान की िा चुकी िज", के अनुसार जनराकषत दक ा िाता िज ।

अनुसूची/ वाि प्रश्न क्रमांक-2 का जन्‍कर्ि

उि वाि प्रश्न में ि जन्‍कर्ि जनकाला िाना िज दक क् ा जद्वती ृक्ष एस.ई.सी.एल. द्वारा सबदक्रप्िन की

राजि लगभग 72 ला रुृ े अृने अजभरक्षा में र ा िाना जवजिक अ वा उजचत िज अ वा निीं ? और दि निीं तो

प्र म ृक्ष क् ा अनुतोर् की ृात्रता र ते िैं ? उि संबंि में प्र म ृक्ष द्वारा स्ट्व ं ईश्वर हसंि चंिेल एवं िीृक

िा सवाल मिासजचव, राष्ट्री मििूर कालरी संघ का साक्ष् न् ा ाल के समक्ष प्रस्ट्तुत दक ा िज । साक्षी ईश्वर हसंि

चंिेल ने अृने न् ा ाल ीन क न में बता ा िज दक जद्वती ृक्ष द्वारा उनकी ूजन न आर.सी.एम.सी. के सा भेिभाव

करता रिा िज त ा आर.सी.एम.सी. के सिस्ट् ों द्वारा अृने वेतन से कटवा े ग े आर.सी.एम.सी. के चंिे की राजि को

गजर कानूनी रुृ से रोकने का आिेि िारी दक ा ग ा िज । साक्षी के अनुसार चंिे की उि राजि जवगत 10 वर्ों से

एस.ई.सी.एल. अृने आजिृत् मे र ा हुआ िज, िबदक उसे रोकने का अजिकारी दकसी अ ाठरटी अ वा न् ा ाल

द्वारा निीं दि ा ग ा िज । साक्षी ने अृने िृ ृत्र की कंजडका-14 में उि राजि बित्तर ला रुृ े को म ब् ाि

प्र म ृक्ष को दिलवा े िाने का अनुतोर् दि े िाने का क न दक ा िज । इसी तरि प्र म ृक्ष के साक्षी िीृक

िा सवाल ने भी अृने न् ा ाल ीन क न में ि बता ा दक जद्वती ृक्ष उनकी ूजन न आर.सी.एम.सी. के सा

भेिभाव व्यविार करती रिी िज, जिसके तित जद्वती ृक्ष ने आर.सी.एम.सी. के चंिे की राजि को रोक जल ा ग ा िज ।

उि् िोनों साजक्ष ों ने मौज क रुृ से ि तो क न दक ा िज दक जद्वती ृक्ष द्वारा मििूरों के ूजन न िेतु

काटी गई राजि को अृने आजिृत् में र जल ा ग ा िज । ृरन्तु प्र म ृक्ष के साक्षी ईश्वर हसंि चंिेल ने इस संबंि में

दकसी प्रकार का िस्ट्तावेिी साक्ष् न् ा ाल के समक्ष प्रस्ट्तुत निीं दक ा िज । िालांदक साक्षी िीृक िा सवाल ने

न् ा ाल के समक्ष माननी उच्च न् ा ाल के आिेि दिनांक 03.02.2009 की प्रमाजित प्रजतजलजृ प्रििि ृी-1,

जमजनस्ट्री आि लेबर एण्ड एम्ृला मेंट को जल ा ग ा ृत्र दिनांक 03.03.2016 की प्रजत प्रििि ृी-2,

ृिाजिकाठर ों के ृठरवतिन संबंिी प्रृत्र की प्रमाजित प्रजतजलजृ प्रििि ृी-3 एवं ृी-4, माननी उच्च न् ा ाल

मध् प्रिेि के ृाठरत आिेि दिनांक 09.11.2010 की प्रजतजलजृ प्रििि ृी-5, माननी उच्चतम न् ा ाल के ृाठरत

आिेि की प्रमाजित प्रजतजलजृ प्रििि ृी-6 न् ा ाल के समक्ष प्रस्ट्तुत दक ा िज ृरन्तु उि समस्ट्त िस्ट्तावेि में से प्रििि

ृी-1 एवं प्रििि ृी-5 न् ा ाल के प्रकरि का िस्ट्तावेि िैं । इसी तरि प्रििि ृी-2 क्षेत्री श्रम आ ुि द्वारा जल ा

ग ा ृत्र िज । उि िस्ट्तावेिों से ि जन्‍कर्ि निीं जनकाला िा सकता दक जद्वती ृक्ष द्वारा मििूरों से बित्तर ला

रुृ े की राजि उनके वेतन से काटी गई िज । इसी तरि प्रििि ृी-3 एवं प्रििि ृी-4 के िस्ट्तावेि भी इस संबंि में िज दक

प्र म ृक्ष ईश्वर हसंि चंिेल एवं िीृक िा सवाल ूजन न के ृिाजिकारी िैं अ वा निीं ? अताः उि् िस्ट्तावेि से भी

वाि प्रश्न क्रमांक-2 के संबंि में प्र म ृक्ष को कोई लाभ प्राप्त निीं िोता िज ।

एक ओर तो प्र म ृक्ष न् ा ाल से ि अनुतोर् चाि रिा िज दक न् ा ाल चेक आि जसस्ट्टम के तित

काटी गई राजि लगभग बित्तर ला रुृ े प्र म ृक्ष को दिलवाई िावें विीं िूसरी ओर प्र म ृक्ष के साक्षी िीृक

िा सवाल द्वारा मु्‍ ृरीक्षि की कंजडका-14 में ि बता ा िज दक दिनांक 28.11.2014 को भारत सरकार की ओर

से आिेि दि ा ग ा ा दक सत्तर ला रुृ े की राजि ूजन न को वाृस कर िी िा , ृरन्तु उि आिेि का ृालन

निीं दक ा ग ा । साक्षी िीृक िा सवाल ने अृने क न की कंजडका-8 में ि भी बता ा िज दक दिनांक

03.02.2009 को माननी उच्च न् ा ाल द्वारा गुििोर् ृर जनराकरि करते हुए उि रकम को ूजन न के

ृिाजिकाठर ों को वाृस करने का जनिेि दि ा ग ा ा । िालांदक आगे ि भी क न दक ा ग ा दक दि अनावेिक

रकम निीं िेता िज, तो ूजन न सक्षम न् ा ाल में वाि प्रस्ट्तुत करने िेतु स्ट्वतंत्र रिेगा, भी न् ा ाल ने जनर्िित दक ा

ा, ृरन्तु साक्षी के उि क न से ि िर्िित िोता िज दक माननी उच्च न् ा ाल द्वारा दिनांक 03.02.2009 को उि

रकम के संबंि में जनराकरि कर दि ा ग ा ा । दि माननी न् ा ाल के आिेिानुसार उि राजि अिा निीं की

गई ी तो प्र म ृक्ष को चाजिए ा दक वि अवमानना का प्रकरि प्रस्ट्तुत करें अ वा अन् कोई का िवािी करें ।

ृरन्तु प्र म ृक्ष द्वारा ृुनाः उि राजि को प्रिान दक े िाने का वाि प्रस्ट्तुत दक ा ग ा िज ।

2390 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 12, 2022/KARTIKA 21, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

10.

साक्षी ईश्वर हसंि चंिेल ने अृने प्रजतृरीक्षि की कंजडका-17 में ि स्ट्वीकार दक ा िज दक चंिे को िडृने

त ा जद्वती ृक्ष द्वारा भेिभाव करने के संबंि में उसके द्वारा कोई िस्ट्तावेि ृेि निीं दक ा ग ा िज । इसी तरि साक्षी

िीृक िा सवाल ने भी प्रजतृरीक्षि की कंजडका-25 में ि स्ट्वीकार दक ा िज दक उनके द्वारा ऑजडट ठरृोटि एवं चेक

आि राजि का जवस्ट्तषत जववरि प्रकरि में प्रस्ट्तुत निीं दक ा ग ा िज । िालांदक अंजतम तकि के िौरान प्र म ृक्ष द्वारा

अृने जलज त तकि में ि तकि दक ा ग ा िज दक जद्वती ृक्ष द्वारा चेक आि जसस्ट्टम के तित ृजसा काटकर अृने ृास

र ने का कोई िस्ट्तावेि त ा आर.सी.एम.सी. को चंिे की रकम दि े िाने का कोई साक्ष् प्रस्ट्तुत निीं दक ा ग ा िज,

िोदक साक्ष् अजिजन म की िारा 114-िी के तित उृिारिा का आिार बनाती िज । प्र म ृक्ष द्वारा जलज त तकि में

आिेि 8 जन म 3 एवं जन म 5 सी.ृी.सी. का भी िवाला दि ा ग ा दक जद्वती ृक्ष ने अृने िवाब िावा में जवर्निष्ट

क न निीं दक ा िज, जिससे उि तथ् स्ट्वीकषत तथ् माने िा ेंगे ।

11.

जद्वती ृक्ष के िवाब िावा का अवलोकन दक ा ग ा । जद्वती ृक्ष ने अृने िवाब िावा की कंजडका-8 में

प्र म ृक्ष के अजभवचन से इंकार दक ा िज त ा कंजडका-5 में इस तथ् से भी इंकार दक ा िज दक चेक आि जसस्ट्टम के

अंतगित वेतन से काटी गई राजि को उनके द्वारा रोके िाने की मंिा का ृोर्ि दक ा ग ा िज । ऐसी ििा में केवल

जद्वती ृक्ष के अजभवचन के आिार ृर प्र म ृक्ष के ृक्ष में जन्‍कर्ि निीं जनकाला िा सकता । जवदित िो दक

भारती साक्ष् अजिजन म की िारा-101 के अनुसार िो न् ा ाल से ि चािता िज दक दकसी तथ् के अजस्ट्तत्व ृर

न् ा ाल जवश्वास करें, इसी तरि िारा 102 के अनुसार दि सबूत के अभाव में कोई वाि असिल िो िाएगा, तो

एेेसी ििा में उस तथ् को जसद्घ करने का भार उस व्यजि ृर िोता िज, िो न् ा ाल से उस तथ् के अजस्ट्तत्व ृर

जवश्वास करने का इच्छा र ता िज अ वा उस व्यजि ृर िोता िज, जिसके द्वारा सबूत न दि े िाने ृर उसका वाि

जविल िो िाएगा । प्रस्ट्तुत प्रकरि में सबूत का भार प्र म ृक्ष ृर ा, ृरन्तु प्र म ृक्ष ने इस संबंि में दकसी प्रकार

का िस्ट्तावेिी साक्ष् प्रस्ट्तुत निीं दक ा िज । माननी उच्चतर न् ा ाल द्वारा जवजभन्न न् ा िष्टांतों के माध् म से ि

जसद्यान्त प्रजतृादित दक ा िज दक वािी कभी भी प्रजतवािी की असिलता के आिार ृर कोई अनुतोर् प्राप्त निीं कर

सकता, उसे अृना वाि स्ट्व ं जसद्घ करना िोता िज ।

12.

प्र म ृक्ष के अनुसार मििूरी संिा अजिजन म की िारा-7 (टटट) के अनुसार व्यवसा संघ अजिजन म

1926 के अिीन रजिस्ट्रीकषत दकसी व्यवसा संघ की सिस्ट् ता के जलए जन ोजित व्यजि संिे िीस का संिा करने

के जलए, उस व्यजि के जलज त प्राजिकरि से कटौती की िावेगी । प्र म ृक्ष के उि तथ् को जद्वती ृक्ष के साक्षी

मनीर् श्रीवास्ट्तव द्वारा प्रजतृरीक्षि की कंजडका-17 में स्ट्वीकार दक ा ग ा िज दक साक्षी के उि् स्ट्वीकारोजत्त एवं

अजिजन म से ि तो प्रमाजित िोता िज दक रेड ूजन न के सिस्ट् ों के वेतन से सबदक्रप्िन राजि काटी िाती िज त ा

ूजन न के ाते में िमा की िाती िज । साक्षी ने प्रजतृरीक्षि की कंजडका 18 में ि भी स्ट्वीकार दक ा िज दक

एस.ई.सी.एल. मु्‍ ाल द्वारा चेक आि जसस्ट्टम के तित राजि िमा दक े िाने िेतु सकुिलर िारी दक ा ग ा िज ।

साक्षी ने ि भी स्ट्वीकार दक ा िज दक िो राजि काटी िाती िज, उसे ूजन न के ाते मे िमा कर दि ा िाता िज ।

ृरन्तु केवल उि तथ् के आिार ृर ि जन्‍कर्ि निीं जनकाला िा सकता दक प्र म ृक्ष के सिस्ट् ों के वेतन से सत्तर

ला रुृ े की राजि काटी गई िज । िालांदक जद्वती ृक्ष के साक्षी मनीर् श्रीवास्ट्तव ने प्रजतृरीक्षि की कंजडका 21 में

ि भी स्ट्वीकार दक ा िज दक प्र म ृक्ष के सिस्ट् ों की चेक आि के तित रोकी गई समस्ट्त राजि ृर आर.सी.एम.सी.

के ूजन न की अजिकाठरता िज ृरन्तु उि स्ट्वीकारोजत्त से भी जद्वती ृक्ष द्वारा प्र म ृक्ष की सत्तर ला रुृ े की

राजि रोककर र े िाने के संबंि में स्ट्ृष्ट जन्‍कर्ि निीं जनकाला िा सकता ।

13.

प्र म ृक्ष द्वारा न तो अृने अजभवचन में ि स्ट्ृष्ट दक ा िज दक वि न् ा ाल से क् ा अनुतोर् चािता िज

और न िी उस संबंि में कोई स्ट्ृष्ट अजभवचन दक ा िज दक जद्वती ृक्ष द्वारा दकस अजिजन म एवं दकस िारा का

उल्ल्ंघन दक ा ग ा िज । िालांदक न् ा ाल के समक्ष हुए क न में प्र म ृक्ष द्वारा सत्तर ला की राजि प्रिान दक े

िाने का अनुतोर् चािा ग ा िज ृरन्तु उि क न जबना अजभवचन के दक ा ग ा क न िज । प्र म ृक्ष को चाजिए ा

दक वि ि अजभवचन करता दक जद्वती ृक्ष द्वारा उसके ूजन न के सिस्ट् ों के वेतन से चंिे की राजि बित्तर ला

रुृ े काटी गई िज त ा उसे प्रिान निीं दक ा िा रिा िज सा िी काटी गई चंिे की राजि को िस्ट्तावेिी साक्ष् के

माध् म से न् ा ाल के समक्ष प्रमाजित करना ा ृरन्तु प्र म ृक्ष द्वारा न तो ऐसा स्ट्ृष्ट अजभवचन दक ा ग ा िज

और न िी जद्वती ृक्ष द्वारा काटी गई राजि को िस्ट्तावेिी साक्ष् से प्रमाजित दक ा िज । िालांदक साक्षी िीृक

िा सवाल ने अृने मु्‍ ृरीक्षि की कंजडका-2 में उि संबंि में क न दक ा िज ृरन्तु उि क न भी जबना

अजभवचन का क न िज । प्र म ृक्ष द्वारा अृने अृने आवेिन के संबंि में दकसी प्रकार का स्ट्ृष्ट िस्ट्तावेिी साक्ष्

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 12, 2022/कार्तिक 21, 1944

2391

प्रस्ट्तुत निीं दक ा िज । दकसी अन् न् ा ाल में लंजबत अ वा जनराकषत प्रकरि के आिार ृर ि न् ा ाल प्र म ृक्ष

के ृक्ष में आिेि निीं कर सकती । ि और भी िबदक स्ट्व ं प्र म ृक्ष के साक्षी िीृक िा सवाल के अनुसार काटी

गई राजि सत्तर ला रुृ े को िेने का आिेि माननी उच्च न् ा ाल द्वारा कर दि ा ग ा िज ऐसी ििा में वाि प्रश्न

क्रमांक-2 का जन्‍कर्ि प्र म ृक्ष के ृक्ष में निीं जनकाला िा सकता । अताः अनुसूची/वाि प्रश्न क्रमांक-2 का जन्‍कर्ि

"निीं" में जनराकषत दक ा िाता िज ।

14.

अताः प्रकरि में जनम्नानुसार अजिजनिि ृाठरत दक ा िाता िजाः-

प्र म ृक्ष द्वारा प्रस्ट्तुत स्ट्टेटमेंट आि क्लेम ाठरि दक ा िाता िज ।

उभ ृक्ष अृना अृना वाि व्य स्ट्व विन करेंगे ।

अजिजनिि ृाठरत, िस्ट्ताक्षठरत

ििाबुद्दीन कुरजिी, ृी ासीन अजिकारी

नई दिल्ली, 3 नवम् बर, 2022

का.आ. 1123.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरि में

केन्री सरकार एलआईसी ऑफ़ इंजड ा के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री ू. प्रभाकर राव बीच अनुबंि में

जनर्ििष्ट औद्योजगक जववाि में केन्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरि एवं श्रम न् ा ाल , िजिराबाि ृंचाट

(संिभि सं्‍ ा 111/2014) को प्रकाजित करती िज।

[la- ,y-17012/32/2014-vkbZvkj ¼,e½]

vk'kh’k dqekj ;kno] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 3rd November, 2022

S.O. 1123.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. (111/2014) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal/Labour Court, Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the

employers in relation to the management of LIC of India and Shri U. Prabhakara Rao.

[No. L-17012/32/2014-IR(M)]

ASHISH KUMAR YADAV, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present: - Sri V. Vijay Kumar, LLM, Presiding Officer

Dated the 12^th day of May, 2022

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 111/2014

Between:

Sri U. Prabhakara Rao,

C/o Srirangam Sitaratnam,

D.No.5-72, Transformer Sandu,

Sanivarapupeta,

Eluru. West Godavari Distt.

…Petitioner

AND

The Sr. Divisional Manager,

LIC of India, Divisional Office,

Jeevan Godavari, Morampudi,

Rajahmundry.

2392 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 12, 2022/KARTIKA 21, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

The Branch Manager,

LIC of India, Eluru Branch,

Eluru. W.G. Distt..

… Respondents

Appearances:

For the Petitioner :

Party in Person

For the Respondent : None

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No.L-17012/ 32/2014-IR(M) dated 7.7.2014

referred the following dispute under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal

between the management of Life Insurance Corporation of India and their workman. The reference is,

SCHEDULE

“Whether the removal from service of Sri U. Prabhakara Rao, Ex-Temp. Class-IV LIC of India,

Eluru-II Branch w.e.f. 28.1.2013 is legal and justified? If not, what other relief the workman is

entitled to?”

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 111/2014 and notices were issued to the parties

concerned and the Petitioner entered appearance. The workman did not file claim statement. The management

remained ex-parte.

It is seen that this matter is pending from 15.9.2014. There is no appearance for parties from

20.7.2018. The matter is pending for more than eight years without any progress in adjudication of the

dispute. Even after eight years, the workman did not file the claim statement. It is felt that the

workman/Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter any further. Hence, it is felt that it is a

proper case where a ‘No Claim’ award can be passed. As such, a ‘No Claim’ award is passed.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant, corrected by me on this 12^th day of

May, 2022.

V. VIJAY KUMAR, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the

Petitioner

Respondent

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 4 uoEcj] 2022

-—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj इंजड न रेलवे कजटररंग एंड टूर्सिम कॉृोरेिन izca/k rarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k

esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k 2 ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 101@2020½

dks izdkf'kr djrh gSA

[la- ,y-12025@01@2022-vkbZ vkj ¼ch-1½-10]

,- ds- ;kno] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 4th November, 2022

S.O. 1124.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 101/2020) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court –II New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Indian

Railway Catering & Toursim Corporation and their workmen.

[No. L-12025/01/2022– IR(B-1)-10]

A.K YADAV, Under Secy.

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 12, 2022/कार्तिक 21, 1944

2393

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II, NEW DELHI

Present: Smt. Pranita Mohanty, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-Cum-Labour

Court-II, New Delhi.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 101/2020

Date of Passing Award- 20.10.2022

Between:

Shri Sanjay Kumar,

S/o Shri Ram Mehar,

R/o House No. 895-C/31, Ward No.8,

Mehrauli, New Delhi-110030.

Through- The Secretary, Delhi Labour Union,

Agarwal Bhawan, G T Road, Tis Hazari, Delhi-110054.

…Workman

Versus

The Chairman cum Managing Director,

Indian Railway Catering & Tourism Corporation,

Corporate Office:- B-148, 11^th Floor, Statesman House,

Barakhamba Road, New Delhi-110001.

…Management

Appearances:-

Shri N Bhusan (A/R) : For the claimant

None for the management (A/R) : For the Management

AWARD

This is an application filed by the claimant invoking the provision of sec 2A of the ID Act 1947,

wherein he has challenged the order of Termination of his service, describing the action of the respondent as

illegal, arbitrary and harassing.

As stated in the claim petition, the claimant Sanjay kumar had joined the service of the respondent in

September 2006 as an apprentice to discharge the duty of Food and Beverage Service Attendant. In April 2009,

his service was regularized in the post of Food and Beverage Service Attendant/W-1. For his satisfactory

performance, in 2012, he was given promotion to the post of Food and Beverage Service Attendant/W-2 and

working at IST/ITCTC/NRC. On 12.02.2015, he was orally informed by the supervisor Mr. Hitesh Sharma to

report for duty at the cafeteria in the 5^th floor of Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. On

the same day the claimant reported at his new place of duty and was assigned the duties to be performed. When

he was discharging his duties in the cafeteria, on 16.06.2015, the then DGM, NRP called him to his office and

asked how he is working in the cafeteria at Shastri Bhawan without any order of transfer. On hearing the

explanation offered by the claimant with regard to the oral instruction of the supervisor, the DGM, NRP, on

23.06.2015 gave a written communication to the claimant to the effect that his place of duty is

ISTM/IRCTC/NRC. This letter was received by the claimant on 27.06.2015 and immediately thereafter i.e on

29.06.2015, he reported for duty to one Mr. Jai Singh, supervisor of ISTM/IRCTC/NRC and worked there till

14.07.2015as Food and Beverage Service Attendant, when the supervisor Mr. Jai Singh again verbally

instructed him to join his duty in the base kitchen, New Delhi Railway Station. In view of his past experience,

the workman asked for a written order of his relocation. Instead of giving any such written order, the supervisor

Mr. Jai Singh took the claimant in his car to the base kitchen on 14.07.2015. There, instead of assigning duty,

the workman was asked to proceed on leave for 8-9 days during which the written order of his transfer will be

communicated to him. The workman being left with no other option, proceeded on leave as advised. But to his

astonishment, no written order of transfer was communicated as assured by the supervisor Jai Singh. On

24.07.2015, he visited his earlier place of posting i.e ISTM/IRCTC/NRC and asked for his order of transfer to

the base kitchen. He was not even allowed to mark his attendance there. He made communication by writing

letters to the higher authorities apprising as how he has been kept out of performing his duties. But the said

communication was never replied by the Management. Instead, to his utter surprise, on 24.08.2015, the

workman was placed under suspension by a written order issued from the office of the IRCTC, base kitchen

2394 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 12, 2022/KARTIKA 21, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi. On 09.05.2016, the order of suspension was revoked and the workman was directed to report for

duty immediately at the base kitchen, even though there was no written order of transfer to that place.

During the period of suspension the workman was served with a charge sheet dated 22.02.2016,

alleging unauthorized absence. The workman had given a written reply dt16.04.2016, denying the charge.

Though he had gone to the office of ISTM/IRCTC/NRC, again and again with the intension of joining duty, the

authorities did not allow him. He was informed about appointment of Mr. Darshan Kumar as the inquiry officer

of the domestic inquiry initiated against him. Though the workman was attending the inquiry on each date of the

proceeding and requesting the inquiry officer to take note of the fact that he is not getting the subsistence

allowance during the period of suspension, the same was never taken note of. He had last appeared before the

inquiry officer on 18.10.2016 and there after the date of adjournment was never communicated to him. On the

contrary, suddenly on 15.01.2017, he was informed about the closure of evidence and asked to submit the

written submission if any. The workman wrote a letter requesting the communication to be provided in Hindi as

he is not conversant with English. The request was not complied. Suddenly the work man received a

communication dated 29.05.2019, according to which the charge against him was held proved and the penalty of

dismissal from service was imposed on him. Before that final order the order of the inquiry officer was never

served on him nor he was called upon to show cause against the order of the inquiry officer and the punishment

proposed. Finding no other way, the workman has approached the labour commissioner for redressal of his

grievance. Steps were taken by the conciliation officer for settlement of the dispute. But for the non co operative

attitude of the Respondent no solution could be arrived and the failure report was communicated to the work

man. Having no other remedy available, he approached this Tribunal for setting aside the order of dismissal on

the ground that the inquiry was not fairly conducted and the punishment is an action of vindication, though he is

innocent.

Notice of the proceeding was served on the Respondent by post being sent by this Tribunal. But the

Respondent did not appear to participate in the proceeding. Thus by order dated 3^rd January 2022, fresh notice

was issued to the respondent as well as the claimant since there were enblock adjournments on account of

COVID guideline and suspension of physical functioning of the Tribunal. In response to the said notice which

were served on both the parties, the workman appeared on 21^st March 2022, but the respondent did not appear.

Hence by order dated 21.03.2022, the Respondent was proceeded exparte and the matter was adjourned for work

man evidence. On the next date the workman testified as WW1 and produced several documents, which were

taken on record as ww1/1 to ww1/40. These documents are the legal demand notice sent to the management

copy of the postal receipt showing dispatch of the same the copy of the claim filed before the Labour

Commissioner the reply filed by the management to the said claim, his appointment letter, office order dated

22.1.2015 several correspondence made by the claimant to the management copy of the leave application

seeking leave from 15.07.2015 etc. the claimant besides filing the documents in his oral statement has fully

supported the stand taken in the claim petition.

On perusal of the oral statement and the document which has been marked as WW1/4 and the reply

given by the management to the claim of the workman before the commissioner the admitted facts are that the

workman had joined into the employment of the management in the year 2006 and on 29.04.2009 his service

was regularized. On 13.07.2015 he was asked to work in the base kitchen at Railway Station New Delhi.

Whereas the claimant states that after reporting at the base kitchen he was asked to go on leave, the management

in his written reply before the labour commissioner had stated that the claimant voluntarily proceeded on leave

and thereafter instead of joining in the base kitchen he went to the office of NRC Unit/ ISTM with his father on

14.08.2015 and created nuisance. He interfered in the smooth functioning of the office for which he was warned.

He went on alleging that his transfer is legal and did not join duty at the base kitchen. For the unauthorized

absence charge was framed and he was proceeded with. At the end of the inquiry he was found guilty and major

punishment was imposed.

This statement made by the respondent before the labour commissioner was never recorded in this

proceeding for the non appearance of the management. Thus, the evidence of the claimant with regard to the

illegal termination has remained unchallenged and rebutted. On the basis of the unchallenged evidence adduced

by the claimant this tribunal comes to a conclusion that the management IRCTC had imposed a major

punishment on the claimant without conducting a proper domestic inquiry against him. As such the punishment

so imposed is liable to be set aside as illegal and arbitrary. Hence, ordered.

ORDER

The claim be and the same is allowed. It is held that the management IRCTC illegally terminated the

service of the claimant without holding a proper domestic inquiry and imposed a major penalty on him by

dismissing him from service. Accordingly it is held that the claimant is entitled to the relief of reinstatement

with back wages and continuity of service. Accordingly it is directed that the claimant shall report at the base

kitchen of IRCTC New Delhi railway station within one month from the date of publication of award and the

management shall allow him to join the duty. The management is further directed to pay 50% of the wage for

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 12, 2022/कार्तिक 21, 1944

2395

the intervening period between the date of termination and reinstatement to the claimant and treat the said period

as continuous service of the claimant and all other service benefits of the same period shall be granted to him.

The accrued back wages shall be paid to the claimant within two months from the date of his joining on

reinstatement without interest failing which the amount so accrued shall carry interest @ 6% per annum from

the date of accrual and till the final payment is made. Send a copy of this award to the appropriate government

for notification as required under section 17 of the ID act 1947.

The reference is accordingly answered.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

20^th October, 2022

PRANITA MOHANTY, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम् बर, 2022

का.आ. 1125.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरि में,

केन्री सरकार वठरष्ठ अिीक्षक,डाकघर िबलृुर क्षेत्र, िबलृुर (म.प्र.) के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री

दकिनलाल मेिरा, कामगार ,के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्ििष्ट केन्री सरकार vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;]

िबलृुर ृंचाट (संिभि सं्‍ ा CGIT/LC/R/151/2000) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज, प्रकाजित

करती िज िो केन्री सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉृी के सा 07/10/2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. एल-40012/234/2000-आईआर-(डी ू)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 7th November, 2022

S.O. 1125.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/LC/R/151/2000) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal cum Labour–Jabalpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in

relation to The Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Jabalpur Region, Jabalpur (M.P.) and Shri Kishanlal

Mehra, worker, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on

07/10/2022.

[No. L-40012/234/2000- IR (DU)]

D. K.HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/151/2000

Present: P. K. Srivastava, H.J.S..( Retd)

Shri Kishanlal Mehra,

C/o Deepchand Jharia,

Purana Dhobhighat,

Water Works Road,

PO:Bhita Temer,

Jabalpur (M.P.)

…Workman

Versus

The Senior Superintendent of Post Offices,

Jabalpur Region,

Jabalpur (M.P.)

…Management

2396 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 12, 2022/KARTIKA 21, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AWARD

(Passed on 13-7-2022)

As per letter dated 29/8/2000 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the

reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per

Notification No.L-40012/234/2000-IR(DU). The dispute under reference relates to:

“Whether the action of the management of Senior Suptd. Of Post Offices, Jabalpur Sambhag,

Jabalpur in terminating the services of Sh. Kishanlal Mehra, Extra Departmental Delivery Agent

w.e.f. 1/6/98 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled .”

After registering the case on the basis of reference, notices were sent to the parties. Both the parties

have filed their respect statement of claim/defence.

The case of the workman as stated in his statement of claim is that he was employed by Management

as Branch Dakpal and posted at Gangai Post Office we.f. 24-4-1992 till 2-6-1998 and had attained the status of

permanent employee. He was issued a departmental charge sheet on the allegation of mis-appropriation of

Rs.18,100/- which he collected from depositors and was required to deposit in their respective accounts.

According to the workman, the inquiry was not conducted as per law. He was not given opportunity to defend

himself. Charges were not proved during the inquiry and punishment of dismissal was disproportionate to the

charges. The workman sought the relief of his reinstatement with all back wages. The workman was dismissed

by way of punishment by Disciplinary Authority acting on the basis of inquiry report dated 2-6-1998. The

Departmental appeal against dismissal was also rejected by Appellate Authority vide order dated 22-8-1999. A

mercy petition by the workman sent to the Post Master General was also rejected vide order dated 22-8-2000.

According to the Management, the workman raised the amount from the account holder and did not

deposit the amount in their accounts. During the inquiry, he admitted his guilt and deposited the amount along

with interest. According to the Management the charges regarding misconduct were serious, hence the

punishment imposed is proportionate to the charge. The Management has thus requested that the reference be

answered against the workman.

The following issues were framed by my learned Predecessor vide his order dated 30-10-2006:-

(1)

Whether the departmental inquiry conducted by Management against the workman is

proper and legal. If not, whether the Management is entitled to prove the misconduct of

workman?

(2) To what relief if any, the workman is entitled?

Issue No.1 was taken as preliminary issue by my learned Predecessor. Parties were required to lead

their respective evidence on preliminary issue. The workman and Management examined their witness and

proved the inquiry papers.

Vide his order dated 11-11-2013 my learned Predecessor held the departmental inquiry against the

workman not legal and proper

The Management preferred a Writ Petition No.8800/2014 which was dismissed by Hon’ble Court vide

order dated 5-10-2016.

Thereafter the Management was given a chance to prove the charges but no evidence at all was

adduced by Management. The workman also did not adduce any evidence.

I have heard arguments of learned Counsel Shri Uttam Maheshwari for workman and Shri S.K.Mishra

for Management and have gone through the record. The following issues come up for determination:-

(1)

Whether the Management is an industry as defined in Industrial Disputes Act,1947?

(2)

Whether the charges against the workman are proved?

(3)

Whether the workman is entitled to any relief?

10.

ISSUE NO.1:- Learned Counsel for the Management has referred to decision of Hon’ble Karnataka

High Court in the case of the Superintendent of Post Offices, Vs. H.B.Shivanna passed in Writ Petition

No.34051/2017. IN this case Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka held that since there are separate rules for

recruitment, service and removal of extra departmental sub post-office master, Branch Post-office Master,

delivery Agents and Stamp Vendors they are not workman as defined under Section 2(J) of the Industrial

Disputes Act,1947. In the case in hand also, the workman is an extra departmental post master, hence in the light

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 12, 2022/कार्तिक 21, 1944

2397

of law laid down by Hon’ble High Court, he is held not to be a workman as defined under Section 2(J) of the

Industrial Disputes Act,1947. Issue No.1 is answered accordingly.

11.

ISSUE NO.2:- As established above, the departmental inquiry has been held against law by my learned

Predecessor and this order has been up held by Hon’ble High court. Thereafter the burden was on management

to prove the charge. The management has not led any evidence. According to the management , since the case

is old the records and witnesses are not available as they have retired, dead or untraceable. Learned Counsel for

the management has referred to the statement of the workman on oath recorded during the hearing of

preliminary issue regarding legality of departmental inquiry, wherein he stated that he could not credit the

amount in the account of account holders due to mistake as he was overburdened and thereafter he deposited the

entire amount with interest. Accounting the learned counsel for Management, this confession of the workman is

sufficient to prove him guilty for the charge of misconduct. I do not subscribe to this argument because his

statement regarding his admission of his guilt will be taken as a whole. He also says that it was a bonafide

mistake on his part. Hence, in these circumstances, the charge against the workman is held not proved. Issue

No.2 is answered accordingly.

12.

ISSUE NO.3:- IN the light of findings recorded on Issue No.1, the workman is held entitled to no

relief. The Issue No.3 is answered accordingly.

13.

On the basis of the above discussion, following award is passed:-

The action of the management of Senior Suptd. Of Post Offices, Jabalpur Sambhag,

Jabalpur in terminating the services of Sh. Kishanlal Mehra, Extra Departmental Delivery

Agent w.e.f. 1/6/98 is held to be legal and justified.

The workman is held entitled to no relief.

14.

Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as

per rules.

DATE: 13/7/2022

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम् बर, 2022

का.आ. 1126.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरि में,

केन्री सरकार जनिेिक, लक्ष्मीबाई राष्ट्री िारीठरक जिक्षा संस्ट् ान , रेस कोसि रोड, ग्वाजल र (म.प्र.), के प्रबंितंत्र

के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री आलोक िुबे, कामगार, के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्ििष्ट केन्री सरकार vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k

,oa Je U;k;ky;] िबलृुर ृंचाट (संिभि सं्‍ ा CGIT/LC/R/102/2018) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा

िज, प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्री सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉृी के सा 11/10/2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. एल-42012/121/2018-आईआर-(डी ू)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 7th November, 2022

S.O. 1126.— In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/LC/R/102/2018) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal cum Labour Court – Jabalpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the

employers in relation to The Director,Lakshmibai National Institute of Physical Education , Race Course Road,

Gwalior(M.P.), and Shri Alok dubey, worker, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the

Central Government on 11/10/2022.

[No. L-42012/121/2018- IR (DU)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

2398 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 12, 2022/KARTIKA 21, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/102/2018

Present: P. K. Srivastava, H.J.S..( Retd)

Shri Alok dubey

S/o shri Rakesh Kumar dubey

Goshpura No.1,

Near Government School,

Hazira, Gwalior(M.P.)-474002

…Workman

Versus

The Director,

Lakshmibai National Institute of Physical Education

Race Course Road,Gwalior(M.P.)-474002

…Management

AWARD

(Passed on 5-4-2022)

As per letter dated 4-12-2018 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the

reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per

Notification No.L-42012/121/2018-IR(DU). The dispute under reference relates to:

“Whether the action of the management of Registrar, Lakshmibai National Institution of

physical Education , Gwalior in terminating the services of workman Shri Alok Dubey w.e.f. 10-

1-2008 is just and proper?if not , what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?” .”

After registering the case on the basis of reference, notices were sent to the parties.

The workman never appeared inspite of service of notice on him and nor has filed any written

statement of claim.

None appeared from the side of the Management and nor have they filed any written statement of

defence.

The initial burden to prove their claim lies on the workman. He has not filed any statement of claim

nor has he filed any documents or evidence in his support. The workman has miserably failed to prove his

case. Hence this tribunal is constrained to decide the reference against the workmen.

Accordingly the reference is decided against the workman.

Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as

per rules.

DATE: 5-4-2022

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम् बर, 2022

का.आ. 1127.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरि में,

केन्री सरकार मिाप्रबंिक, भारत संचार जनगम जलजमटेड, िेवास गेट, उज्जजन; सरकारी ेकेिार और आृूर्ति, सी/ओ

श्री जमहलंि िार्डिकर, उज्जजन के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री गोवििन लाल, कामगार ,के बीच अनुबंि में

जनर्ििष्ट केन्री सरकार vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;]

िबलृुर ृंचाट

(संिभि सं्‍ ा

CGIT/LC/R/100/2015) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज, प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्री सरकार को

सॉफ्ट कॉृी के सा 11/10/2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. एल-40012/33/2015-आईआर-(डी ू)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 12, 2022/कार्तिक 21, 1944

2399

New Delhi, the 7th November, 2022

S.O. 1127.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/LC/R/100/2015) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal cum Labour–Jabalpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in

relation to The General manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Dewas Gate, Ujjain; The Government

Contractor & supplied, C/o Shri Milind Hardikar, Ujjain and Shri Gobardhan Lal, worker, which was received

along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 11/10/2022.

[No. L-40012/33/2015- IR (DU)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/100/2015

Present: P. K. Srivastava, H.J.S..( Retd)

Shri Gobardhan Lal

S/o shri Thawar lal

R/o 25, New Lakshmi Nagr,

Behind Housing Board,

Sethi Nagar Chouraha

Ujjain (M.P.)

…Workman

Versus

The General manager,

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited,

Chamunda Mata Chouraha

Dewas Gate, Ujjain-456010

The Government Contractor & supplied

C/o shri Milind Hardikar,

Thekedar Milind Constructin,

233, mahashweta Nagar,

Ujjain-456010

…Management

AWARD

(Passed on 7-9-2022)

As per letter dated 22/9/2015 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the

reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per

Notification No.l-40012/33/2015-IR(DU). The dispute under reference relates to:

“Kya shri Milind Hardikar, Malik Milind Constructin 233 Mahashweta Nagar Ujain dwara Shri

Gobardhan Lal, s/o shri Thawar Lal ko lambe samay tak kam kara kar odyogek veveadh Adhiniyar

1947 ke dhara ke prav dhanao ke verudh denank 1-8-2013 se bina notice jya muafza deye kaam se

betha denan nayayuichhit hai. Agar nahi to Avedak kes anutosh ka dhikar hai?.”

After registering the case on the basis of reference, notices were sent to the parties. Both the parties

appeared and have filed their respective statement of claim/defence.

In short the claim of the workman is that he was a daily wager and worked continuously for 240 days

in every year including the year preceding the date of his termination. He has claimed that he was retrenched

without giving him any notice or compensation, thus the termination of the workman is in violation of the

Industrial dispute Rules,1947 and is bad in law.

The Management has denied the claim that the workman ever completed 240 days in any calendar year

in continuous engagement of the Management.

At the stage of evidence, the workman did not appear and nor was he present at the time of argument.

He never filed any documents with respect of his claim.

On the other hand the Management filed affidavit of its witness Smt. Deepmati Shukla, Assistant

General Manager, BSNL,Ujjain. The Management witness has supported the case of Management in its

affidavit which is uncontroverted.

2400 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 12, 2022/KARTIKA 21, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

The Management was represented by its learned counsel Shri R.S.Khare. Since none was present for

the workman at the time of argument, ex-parte argument of Management counsel was heard.

I have gone through the record.

The reference is the point for determination in the case in hand.

In the light of the above facts and circumstances stated above there is nothing on record to hold the

claim of workman proved as the workman has miserably failed to discharge his burden in this case. Hence

holding the claim of the workman not proved the reference deserves to be answered against the workman.

10.

On the basis of the above discussion, following award is passed:-

A. The action of the management as mentioned in the reference is held to be just and proper.

B. The workman is held entitled to no relief.

11.

Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as

per rules.

DATE: 7-9-2022

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम् बर, 2022

का.आ. 1128.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरि में,

केन्री सरकार मु्‍ मिाप्रबंिक, िूरसंचार जवभाग, भोृाल (म.प्र.); कजनष्ठ िूरसंचार अजभ ंता, ब् ावरा, रािगढ़-

(म.प्र.) के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री इसरार अिमि , कामगार ,के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्ििष्ट केन्री

सरकार vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] िबलृुर ृंचाट(संिभि सं्‍ ा CGIT/LC/R/53/2001) को िजसा

दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज, प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्री सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉृी के सा 11/10/2022 को

प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. एल-40012/538/2000-आईआर-(डी ू)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 7th November, 2022

S.O. 1128.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/LC/R/53/2001) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal cum Labour–Jabalpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in

relation to The Chief General Manager, Department of Telecommunication, Bhopal (M.P.); The Junior Telecom

Engineer, Biaora, Rajgarh-(M.P.) and Shri Israr Ahmed, worker, which was received along with soft copy of the

award by the Central Government on 11/10/2022.

[No. L-40012/538/2000- IR (DU)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/53/2001

Present: P. K. Srivastava, H.J.S..( Retd)

Sh.Israr Ahmed

S/o Abdul Aziz

R/o Kurawar, H.No.13, Kurawar

M & I Biaora,Rajgarh (M.P.)

…Workman

Versus

The Chief General Manager

Department of Telecommunication

Hoshangabad Road, M.P.Circle,

Bhopal (M.P.)-462001

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 12, 2022/कार्तिक 21, 1944

2401

The Junior Telecom Engineer

Biaora, Rajgarh (M.P.)

…Management

AWARD

(Passed on 26/7/2022)

As per letter dated 9/2/2001 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference

is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-

40012/538/2000-IR(DU). The dispute under reference relates to:

“Whether the action of the management of Junior Telecom Engineer, Biaora in terminating the

services of Shri Israr Ahmed S/o Abdul Aziz w.e.f. April’94 is justified? If not, to what relief the

workman is entitled? .”

After registering the case on the basis of reference, notices were sent to the parties. Both the parties

have filed their respective statement of claim/defence.

The case of the workman as stated in his statement of claim is that he was engaged as a helper by

Management in the year January 1987 and continued till April 1994 when his services were terminated by the

Management without any notice or compensation though he worked for more than 240 days continuously in

every year including the year preceding the date of his termination. Thus his termination is violative of Section

25F of the Industrial Disputes Act,1947. The workman has prayed that setting aside his termination, he be

reinstated with back wages and benefits.

According to the management, the workman was engaged as a casual labour in the year 1987 by

Management for specific period and specific work, with a condition that his services has come to an end

automatically after completion of the work. He was not engaged on regular basis, against any vacant sanctioned

post or by following rules and procedure of recruitment. He never worked for 240 days or more continuously in

any year including the year preceding the date of his termination, hence, his dis-engagement without notice or

compensation is not against law. The management has prayed that the reference be answered against the

workman.

The Workman has filed his affidavit as his examination-in-chief. He has proved his Employment

Exchange Card as Exhibit W-1. He has not been cross-examined by the Management. The management has

filed earlier affidavit of Shailendra Surjan S.D.E. Administration but could not produce him for cross-

examination, hence ultimately filed Affidavit of its witness Mohd. Feroz Ahmed , Assistant General Manager

Legal and has been cross-examined by the workman.

I have heard arguments of Shri Arun Patel, learned counsel for the workman. None was present from

the side of the Management. They were given opportunity to file written Argument, which they did not avail . I

have gone through the record.

The reference is the issue for determination in the case in hand.

Before entering into any discussion on merit, Section 25B and Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes

Act,1947 is required to be produced here:-

Section 25 B:-

Definition of continuous service.-

(1) a workman shall be said to be in continuous service for a period if he is, for that period, in

uninterrupted service, including service which may be interrupted on account of sickness or

authorised leave or an accident or a strike which is not illegal, or a lock-out or a cessation of

work which is not due to any fault on the part of the workman; (2) where a workman is not in

continuous service within the meaning of clause (1) for a period of one year or six months, he

shall be deemed to be in continuous service under an employer- (a) for a period of one year, if the

workman, during a period of twelve calendar months preceding the date with reference to which

calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the employer for not less than- (i) one

hundred and ninety days in the case of a workman employed below ground in a mine; and (ii)

two hundred and forty days, in any other case; (b) for a period of six months, if the workman,

during a period of six calendar months preceding the date with reference to which calculation is

to be made, has actually worked under the employer for not less than- (i) ninety-five days, in the

case of a workman employed below ground in a mine; and (ii) one hundred and twenty days, in

any other case.

25F. Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen.- No workman employed in any industry

who has been in continuous service for not less than one year under an employer shall be

retrenched by that employer until- (a) the workman has been given one month's notice in

2402 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 12, 2022/KARTIKA 21, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

writing indicating the reasons for retrenchment and the period of notice has expired, or the

workman has been paid in lieu of such notice, wages for the period of the notice: 1[***] (b) the

workman has been paid, at the time of retrenchment, compensation which shall be equivalent to

fifteen days' average pay 2[for every completed year of continuous service] or any part thereof in

excess of six months; and (c) notice in the prescribed manner is served on the appropriate

Government 3[or such authority as may be specified by the appropriate Government by

notification in the Official Gazette.]

The initial burden to prove his continuous engagement for 240 days or more in any year lies on the

workman. The workman has examined himself and has stated that he worked for 240 days in every year till the

date of his termination. He has not been cross-examined by Management. On the other hand, the Management

witness, though has stated in his cross-examination in form of affidavit that the workman never worked

continuously for 240 days or more in any year but in his cross-examination, he admitted that he was never

posted in the office where the workman worked. He never saw the muster roll for the said period. He further

states that he has prepared his affidavit on the basis of earlier affidavit kept in the file. Also that he did not

produce any document to support that the workman had worked continuously for 240 days or more in any year .

Learned Counsel for the workman has referred to judgment of Hon. The Apex Court in the case of

Director Fisheries Terminal Division Vs. Bhikubhai Meghajibhai Chavda AIR(2010) SC 1236 wherein it

has been held that the workman was engaged on daily wage basis and he would have difficulty in accessing the

office documents like muster roll etc. when the workman claims and disposes that he has worked for 240 days

the burden shifts to employer to prove that he did not work for 240 days or more in that year.

10.

In another judgment Gauri Shanker Vs. State of Rajasthan(2015) 12 SCC 754, it has been held by

Hon’ble the Apex Court that withholding of documents i.e. muster roll by the employer may result into drawing

adverse inference against the Management. In the light of law laid down by Hon’ble the Apex Court in the case

cited above, the claim of the workman that he continuously worked for 240 days and more in every year

including the year of his dis-engagement is held proved. Admittedly since no notice or compensation was given

at the time of dis-engagement, the termination of the workman is held violative of the Section 25F of the Act.

11.

In the light of the finding recorded above, the question arises as to what relief the workman is entitled

since the workman was not appointed following any recruitment procedure against sanctioned vacancy, his

reinstatement will not be legally admissible remedy. Accordingly he is held entitled to compensation keeping in

view the tenure of his engagement and other facts and circumstances mentioned here in the case in hand , a

lump sum compensation in lieu of his claims computed at Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand only) will meet

the ends of justice to which the workman is held entitled to recover within 30 days from the date of notification

of the Award in official gazette failing which interest @ 6% per annum from the date of publication of Award

till the date of receipt of Award.

12.

On the basis of the above discussion, following award is passed:-

A. The action of the management of Junior Telecom Engineer, Biaora in terminating the

services of Shri Israr Ahmed S/o Abdul Aziz w.e.f. April’94 is held to be unjustified.

B. The workman is held entitled to a lump sum compensation in lieu of his claims computed at

Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand only) to which the workman is held entitled to recover

within 30 days from the date of notification of the Award in official gazette failing which

interest @ 6% per annum from the date of publication of Award till the date of payment.

13.

Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as

per rules.

DATE: 26-7-2022

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 7 नवम् बर, 2022

का.आ. 1129.— औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरि में,

केन्री सरकार मु्‍ मिाप्रबंिक, िूरसंचार, भोृाल (म.प्र.) के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और सजचव, भारत

संचार जनगम कमिचारी संघ, िबलृुर, के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्ििष्ट केन्री सरकार vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je

U;k;ky;] िबलृुर ृंचाट (संिभि सं्‍ ा CGIT/LC/R/03/2006) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज,

प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्री सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉृी के सा 07/10/2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. एल-40012/105/2005-आईआर-(डी ू)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : नवम् बर 12, 2022/कार्तिक 21, 1944

2403

New Delhi, the 7th November, 2022

S.O. 1129.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/LC/R/03/2006) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal cum Labour–Jabalpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in

relation to The Chief General Manager, Telecom, Bhopal (M.P.) and The Secretary, Bharat Sanchar Nigam

Karmachari Sangh, Jabalpur,which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government

on 07/10/2022.

[No. L-40012/105/2005- IR (DU)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/3/2006

Present: P. K. Srivastava, H.J.S..( Retd)

Shri L.D. Sharma,

Secretary,

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Karmachari Sangh,

H.No.2/B-13, Sangram Sagar Colony,

Near Sagra Village,

P.O.Tilvaraghat, Jabalpur.

…Workman

Versus

The Chief General Manager,

Telecom,

Telecom Bhawan, Hoshangabad Road,

Bhopal (M.P.)

…Management

AWARD

(Passed on 22/7/2022)

As per letter dated 16/1/2006 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the

reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per

Notification No.L-40012/105/2005-IR(DU). The dispute under reference relates to:

“Whether the action of the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Bhopal in terminating the

services instead of regularising Shri Prahlad and Others (List enclosed) who were engaged during

1977 to 1990 and have reportedly worked for 240 days continuously is legal and justified? If not, to

what relief the workman are entitled?” .”

After registering the case on the basis of reference, notices were sent to the parties. Both the parties

have filed their respective statement of claim/defence.

The case of the workman as stated in his statement of claim is that he and others who were engaged

during 1977 to 1990 worked continuously for 240 days and more in every year. They were retrenched without

issuing any notice or paying any compensation which is in violation of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes

Act,1947. Since the Management did not seek any permission for retrenchment as provided under Section 25N

of the Industrial Disputes Act,1947(hereinafter referred to as the word ‘Act’) on this score also the termination

is bad in law. Further, the Management did not follow the principles of last come and first go on this score also

his termination is bad in law being violative of Section 25G & Section 25H of the Act.

The case of the Management in brief is that the workman never disclosed as to where and in which

unit, at what place and under which office he has worked as claimed by him, hence in absence of specific

details, the management is not in a positon to put its specific case, however the management has specifically

denied that the workman has worked for 240 days or more in any year. The management has further denied

violation of Section 25N, 25G and 25H of the Act. Accordingly, the Management has prayed that the reference

be answered against the workman.

The workman has filed his affidavit as his examination in Chief. He has been cross-examined by

Management . He has proved Exhibit W-1.

2404 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 12, 2022/KARTIKA 21, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

The Management has filed affidavit of Shri N.K.Nandanwar, Assistant General Manager, Legal but he

never appeared for cross-examination.

At the time of argument, none appeared for oral arguments. None of the parties filed any written

statement. I have perused the record.

The reference itself is the issue for determination in the case in hand.

Before proceedings, Section 25B, 25F and 25G, 25H and Section 25N of the Industrial Disputes

Act,1947 requires to be reproduced below, which is as follows:-