7728 GI/2022
(2559)
रजिस्ट्री सं. डी.एल. (एन) 04/0007/2003—05
REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05
xxxGIDHxxx
xxxGIDExxx
प्राजिकार से प्रकाजित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप् ताजिक
WEEKLY
सं.
48]
नई दिल् ली, नवम् बर 27—दिसम्बर 3, 2022, िजनवार/ अग्रिायण 6—अग्रिायण 12, 1944
No. 48]
NEW DELHI, NOVEMBER 27—DECEMBER 3, 2022, SATURDAY/AGRAHAYANA 6— AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
इस भाग में जभन् न ृष् सं् या िी िाती िज जिससे दक यि ृष क संकलन के प ृ में र ा िा सके
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भागII— ण् ड 3—उृ- ण् ड(ii)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)
भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों (रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर) द्वारा िारी दकए गए सांजवजिक आिेि और अजिसूचनाएं
Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India
(Other than the Ministry of Defence)
जवत्त मंत्रालय
(जवत्तीय सेवाएं जवभाग)
नई दिल्ली, 25 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1216.—जविेष न्यायालय (प्रजतभूजत संव्यविार अsृराि जवचारण) अजिजनयम, 1992 की िारा
3 उृ िारा (i) द्वारा प्रित्त िजियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्रीय सरकार, एतिद्वारा, श्रीमती अजनता प ृावतारम,
आईआरएस (आईटी: 2003) को जवत्तीय सेवाएं जवभाग के अिीन (गजर-सीएसएस ृि), अजभरक्षक का कायाालय,
म ंबई में दिनांक 7.11.2022 से लेटरल जिफ्ट के आिार ृर 3 वषा की अवजि के जलए या इस ृि के िारी रिने तक,
िो वतामान में दिनांक 28.2.2023 तक िज या दिनांक 24.10.2023 तक (अ ाात् जनिेिक के स्ट्तर ृर 5 वषा के
कायाकाल में िेष कायाावजि तक) या अगले आिेिों तक, िो भी ृिले िो, ृे मजट्ररक्स स्ट्तर-13 में जनिेिक के ृि ृर
जनय ि करती िज।
[फा. सं 23/5/2022-आईएफ-I]
कार्ताकेय जमश्रा, उृ सजचव
सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-19122022-241186
CG-DL-W-19122022-241186
2560 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Financial Services)
New Delhi, the 25th November, 2022
S.O. 1216.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (i) of Section 3 of the Special Court
(Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992, the Central Government hereby appoints
Smt. Anita Rupavataram, IRS (IT:2003) as Director in the Pay Matrix level–13 with effect from 7.11.2022
(AN) in the Office of the Custodian, Mumbai under the Department of Financial Services (a non-CSS post) on
lateral shift basis for a period of 3 years or till the continuation of this post which at present is up to 28.2.2023
or up to 24.10.2023 (i.e. balance tenure of 5 years at Director level) or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 23/5/2022-IF-I]
KARTIKEYA MISRA, Dy. Secy.
जविेि मंत्रालय
(सी.ृी.वी. प्रभाग)
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1217.—रािनजयक और कोंस लीय अजिकारी (िृ एवं फीस) के अजिजनयम, 1948 की िारा 2
के ंड(क) के अन सरण में वजिाजनक आिेि ।
एतद्द्वारा, केंर सरकार भारत के प्रिान कोंसलावास, िो ची ममंन ििर मेेँ ृंकि क मार, वजिक सिायक और
त षार गगा, सिायक अन भाग अजिकारी को दिनांक 30 नवंबर, 2022 से सिायक कोंस लर अजिकारी के तौर ृर
कोंस लर सेवाओं के जनवािन के जलए प्राजिकषत करती िज।
[फा. सं. T.4330/01/2022(54)]
एस.आर.एच. फिमी, उृ सजचव (कांस लर)
MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
(CPV Division)
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1217.—Statutory Order in pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and
Consular Officers (Oaths and fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1048), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri
Pankaj Kumar, Personal Assistant and Shri Tushar Garg, Assistant Section Officer as Assistant Consular
Officers in the Consulate General of India, Ho Chi Minh City to perform the Consular services with effect from
November 30, 2022.
[F. No. T.4330/01/2022(54)]
S.R.H FAHMI, Dy. Secy. (Consular)
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1218.— रािनजयक और कोंस लीय अजिकारी (िृ एवं फीस) के अजिजनयम, 1948 की
िारा 2 के ंड (क) के अन सरण में वजिाजनक आिेि।
एतद्द्वारा, केंर सरकार भारतीय उच्चायोग, लंिन मैं जवजृन, सिायक अन भाग अजिकारी, को
30 नवंबर, 2022 से सिायक कांस लर अजिकारी के प ृ में कांस लर सेवाओं का जनवािन करने के जलए अजिकषत
करती िज।
[फा. सं. टी.4330/01/2022(55)]
एस.आर.एच. फिमी, उृ सजचव (कांस लर)
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2561
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1218.—Statutory Order in pursuance of clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and
Consular Officers (Oaths and fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1048), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Vipin,
Assistant Section Officer in the High Commission of India, London as Assistant Consular Officer to perform
Consular services with effect from November 30, 2022.
[F. No. T.4330/01/2022(55)]
S.R.H. FAHMI, Dy. Secy. (Consular)
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1219.—रािनजयक और कोंस लीय अजिकारी (िृ एवं फीस) के अजिजनयम, 1948 की िारा 2
के ंड (क) के अन सरण में वजिाजनक आिेि ।
एतद्द्वारा, केंर सरकार भारत के सिायक उच्चायोग, चटगाेँव मेेँ श्री िीृ रंिन घोष, सिायक अन भाग
अजिकारी को दिनांक 30 नवंबर 2022
से सिायक कोंस लर अजिकारी के तौर ृर कोंस लर सेवाओं के जनवािन के
जलए प्राजिकषत करती िज।
[फा. सं. टी. 4330/01/2022(56)]
एस.आर.एच. फिमी, उृ सजचव (कांस लर)
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1219.—Statutory Order in pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and
Consular Officers (Oaths and fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1048), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Deep
Ranjan Ghose, Assistant Section Officer as Assistant Consular Officer in the Assistant High Commission of
India, Chittagong to perform the consular services with effect from November 30, 2022.
[F. No. T.4330/01/2022(56)]
S.R.H. FAHMI Dy. Secy. (Consular)
ृेरोजलयम और प्राकषजतक गजस मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली, 25 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1220.—केन्रीय सरकार को, ऐसा प्रतीत िोता िज दक लोकजित में यि आवश्यक िज दक मध्यप्रिेि एवं
उत्तरप्रिेि राज्य में ृेरोजलयम ृिा ों के ृट्ररविन के जलए बीना
-
ृनकी
(कानृ र ृाईृलाइन ृट्ररयोिन के दियान्वयन िेत
भारत ृेरोजलयम ककृमरेिन जलजमटेड द्वारा ृाईृलाइन जबछाई िाना आवश्यक िज।
केन्रीय सरकार को ऐसी ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के प्रयोिन के जलये यि आवश्यक प्रतीत िोता िज, दक ऐसी भूजम में िो
इस से उृाबद्व अन सूची में वर्णात िज, और जिसमें उि ृाईृलाइन जबछाई िाने का प्रस्ट्ताव िज, उृयोग के अजिकार का अिान
दकया िाए।
अतः अब, केन्रीय सरकार, ृेरोजलयम और जनि ृाईृलाइन (भूजम में उृयोग के अजिकार का अिान) अजिजनयम
1962 (1962 का 50) की िारा 3 की उृिारा(1) द्वारा प्रित्त िजियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उस भूजम में उृयोग के अजिकार का
अिान करने के अृने आिय की घोषणा करती िज।
कोई व्यजि िो उि अन सूची में वर्णात भूजम में जितबद्व िज, उस तारी से, जिसको इस अजिसूचना में य ि भारत के
रािृत्र की प्रजतयाेँ सािारण िनता को उृलब्ि करा िी िाती िज, इदिस (21) दिन के भीतर, भूजम के नीचे ृाइृलाइन जबछाए
िाने के जलए उसमें उृयोग के अजिकार के सम्बन्ि में श्री सोिन लाल जडप्टी कलेक्टर, कानृ र(उ0प्र0) सक्षम प्राजिकारी, भारत
2562 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ृेरोजलयम ककृमरेिन जलजमटेड बीना-ृनकी(कानृ र) ृाईृलाइन ृट्ररयोिना, बीृीसीएल एन० एच०.02, कालृी रोड,
कानृ र ृी० ओ० एल० जडृो भौती कानृ र 209305 ; उत्तर प्रिेि को जलज त प ृ से आक्षेृ भेि सकेगा।
अन सूची
गकव का नाम
सवे न./ गाटा न.
क्षेत्रफल
िेक्टेयर
एयर
वगामीटर
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
लवरसी
24
00
08
59
21
00
08
89
[फा. सं. आर-11025(15)/3/2019/-ओआर-I/ई-29921]
ृी. सोमाक मार, अवर सजचव
MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
New Delhi, the 25th November, 2022
S.O. 1220.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest
that for the transportation of the Petroleum Product in the state of Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh Pipeline
should be laid for implementing of Bina-Panki (Kanpur) Pipeline Project by the Bharat Petroleum Corporation
Limited.
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, It is
necessary to acquire the right of user (ROU) in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and
which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification.
Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the petroleum and
Minerals Pipeline (Acquisition of Right of user in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government
hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user there in.
Any person who is interested in the land described in the said schedule, may submit objection in writing
to Shri Sohan Lal Dy. Collector/ Competent Authority, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited. Bina-Panki
(Kanpur) Pipeline Project, N.H. 2, Kalpi Road, Kanpur POL Depot, Bhauti, Kanpur, (U.P.) 209305 (Uttar
Pradesh) within twenty one (21) days from the date on which the copies of this notification Issued under Sub-
section (1) of section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general
public.
SCHEDULE
Tehsil : Bhognipur District : Kanpur Dehat State : Uttar Pradesh
Name of Village
Survey No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sqm.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Lawarsi
24
00
08
59
21
00
08
89
[F. No. R-11025(15)/3/2019-OR-1/E-29921]
P. SOMAKUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 25 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1221.—dsUnzh; ljdkj] lk/kkj.k [k.M vf/kfu;e 1897 dh /kkjk 21 ds lifBr isVªksfy;e
vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ dh /kkjk 6
}kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,s] Hkkjr ljdkj ds jkti= Hkkx II] [k.M 3] mi-[k.M ¼ii½ esa Øekad
1311 ij fnukad 14 ebZ 2020 dks izdkf'kr( Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkd`frd xSl ea=ky;] ubZ fnYyh
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2563
dh vf/klwpuk] dk;kZy; vkns'k Øekad
fnukad
rglhy Hkksxuhiqj ftyk dkuiqj nsgkr
¼mRrj izns'k½ esa vafdr mDr [kljk la[;kvksa esa fofufnZ"V mDr {ks=Qy dh izfof"V;ksa dks ,rn~ }kjk foyksfir
¼Delete½ fd;k tkrk gSA
(1)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
yojlh
22
00
15
20
22
00
08
59
7
00
08
50
7
00
00
82
6
00
08
00
6
00
08
00
5
00
08
00
5
00
08
00
[फा. सं. आर-11025(15)/3/2019/-ओआर-I/ई-29921]
ृी. सोमाक मार, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 25th November, 2022
S.O. 1221.—In exercise of the power conferred by section 6 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines
(Acquisition of Right of user in Land) Act 1962 (50 of 1962) read with Section 21 of General Clauses Act
1897, the Central Government hereby deletes the indicated area of the Khasra or Survey No. from the schedules
of notifications of Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas Government of India Vide S.O. Number 1465 (E)
dated 28.04.2020 for Tehsil Bhognipur, District Kanpur Dehat (Uttar Pradesh) earlier published in the Gazette
Government of India Part II, Section 3, Sub Section (ii), number 1311, dated 14th May, 2020.
SCHEDULE
Tehsil: Bhognipur District: Kanpur DehatState: UttarPradesh
Name of
Village
Area 6 (1)
De Notify Area
Survey
No./Gata
No.
Hectare
Are
Sqm.
Survey
No./Gata
No.
Hectare
Are
Sqm.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
Lawarsi
22
00
15
20
22
00
08
59
7
00
08
50
7
00
00
82
6
00
08
00
6
00
08
00
5
00
08
00
5
00
08
00
[F. No. R-11025(15)/3/2019-OR-1/E-29921]
P. SOMAKUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 28 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1222.—ृेट़्रोजलयम और जनि ृाइृलाइन (भूजम में उृयोग के अजिकार का अिान) अजिजनयम
1962, (1962 का 50) (इसके बाि उि अजिजनयम किा गया िज) की िारा 2 के ंड (क) के अन सरण में, केन् र
सरकार उि अजिजनयम के अिीन जनम् न ताजलका के ककलम (2) में उजल्लज त क्षेत्र के संबंि में ककलम (3) में
उजल्लज त प्रचालनरत ृेरोजलयम ृाइृलाइन के जलए इंजडयन ऑयल ककृमरेिन जलजमटेड िेत उि अजिजनयम के
अंतगात सक्षम प्राजिकरण के कायों के जन्ृािन के जलए जनम्न ताजलका के ककलम (1) में उजल्लज त व्यजि को
प्राजिकषत करती िज : -
व्यजि का नाम और ृता
क्षेत्राजिकार का
क्षेत्र
ृेरोजलयम ृाइृलाइन (न् स)
का नाम
ृट्ररविन दकए िाने
वाले उत्ृाि / उत्ृािों
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
श्री ृंकि क मार जसन्िा
म ्य प्रचालन प्रबंिक,
झार ंड राज्य
ृारािीृ रायृ र रांची
ृाइृलाइन
एमएस, एचएसडी,
ृीसीके
2564 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
इंजडयन ऑयल ककृमरेिन
जलजमटेड
ृारािीृ रायृ र रांची
ृाइृलाइन
इससे ृूवा दिनांक 13 अप्रजल 2019 के भारत के रािृत्र में प्रकाजित दिनांक 4 अप्रजल 2019 के का.आ. 544
के अंतगात झार ंड राज्य में इंजडयन ऑयल ककृमरेिन जलजमटेड के जलए अजिसूजचत सक्षम प्राजिकारी, श्री स िीत
क मार दकस्ट्क , वट्ररष्ठ प्रचालन प्रबंिक प्रभारी, को डी-नोट्रटफाइड समझा िाए।
यि अजिसूचना िारी िोने की तारी से लागू िोगी ।
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/19/2018/-ओआर-I/ई-27024]
ृी. सोमाक मार, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 28th November, 2022
S.O. 1222.—In pursuance of sub-section (a) of Section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines
(Acquisition of Right of Users in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter called the said Act), the Central
Government hereby authorizes the person mentioned in column (1) of the table given below to perform the
functions of the Competent Authority under the said Act for Indian Oil Corporation Limited in respect of areas
mentioned in column (2) for the operational petroleum pipelines laid under the said Act mentioned in Column
(3) of the said Table:-
Name and Address of the
Person
Area of
Jurisdiction
Name of Petroleum Pipeline(s)
Product/products
being transported
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Shri Pankaj Kumar Sinha
Chief Operations Manager,
Indian
Oil
Corporation
Limited
Paradip Raipur Ranchi
Pipeline
Jharkhand state
Paradip Raipur Ranchi Pipeline
MS, HSD, PCK
Earlier notified Competent Authority for Indian Oil Corporation Limited in the State of Jharkhand,
Shri Sujit Kumar Kisku, Senior Operations Manager I/c, vide S.O. 544 of MoP&NG dated 4th April 2019
published in the Gazette of India dated 13th April 2019 stands de-notified.
This notification will be effective from the date of its issue.
[F. No. R-11025(11)/19/2018-OR-1/E-27024]
P . SOMAKUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1223.—केन्रीय सरकार ने ृेरोजलयम और जनि ृाइृलाइन (भूजम में उृयोगकताा के अजिकार
का अिान) अजिजनयम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके ृश्चात उि अजिजनयम किा गया िज दक िारा) की
िारा 3 की उृ-िारा (1), के अिीन िारी की गई भारत सरकार के ृेरोजलयम और प्राकषजतक गजस मंत्रालय की
अजिसूचना सं्या का. आ. 4050 दिनांक 21 अगस्ट्त 2021 िो भारत के साप्ताजिक रािृत्र सं्या का.आ 3716,
1 अक्टूबर, 2021 में प्रकाजित की गई ी द्वारा उस अजिसूचना से संलग्न अन सूची में जवजनर्िाष्ट भूजम में कष्णाृटनम
आंध्र प्रिेि से िजिराबाि तेलंगाना राज्य तक ृेरोजलयम उत्ृािों के ृट्ररविन के जलए कष्णाृटनम-िजिराबाि
ृाइृलाइन ृट्ररयोिना के माध्यम से भारत ृेरोजलयम ककृमरेिन जलजमटेड द्वारा ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के प्रयोिन के
जलए उृयोग के अजिकार का अिान के अृने आिय की घोषणा की ी;
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2565
और उि रािृत्र अजिसूचना की प्रजतयां िनता को दिनांक 22 दिसंबर, 2021 तक उृलब्ि करा िी गई ी;
और सक्षम प्राजिकारी ने, उि अजिजनयम की िारा 6 की उृ-िारा (1) के अिीन केन्रीय सरकार को
अृनी ट्ररृोटा िे िी िज;
और केन्रीय सरकार ने, उि ट्ररृोटा ृर जवचार करने के ृश्चात् और यि समािान िो िाने ृर दक उि भूजम
ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के जलये अृेजक्षत िज, उसमें उृयोग के अजिकार का अिान करने का जवजनजश्चय दकया िज;
अतः अब, केन्रीय सरकार उि अजिजनयम की िारा 6 की उृ-िारा (1) द्वारा प्रित्त िजियों का प्रयोग
करते हुए यि घोषणा करती िज दक इस अजिसूचना से संलग्न अन सूची में जवजनर्िाष्ट भूजम में ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के
जलए उृयोग के अजिकार का अिान दकया िाए;
और केन्रीय सरकार उि अजिजनयम की िारा 6 की उृ-िारा (4) द्वारा प्रित्त िजियों का प्रयोग करते हुए,
यि जनिेि िेती िज दक उि भूजम में उृयोग का अजिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकािन की दिनांक से केन्रीय सरकार में
जनजित िोने की बिाए, सभी जवल्लंगमों से म ि िोकर भारत ृेरोजलयम ककृमरेिन जलजमटेड में जनजित िोगी।
ृेरोजलयम और जनि ृाइृलाइन अजिजनयम, 1962 की िारा 10 के अिीन दकसी भी क्षजतृूर्ता के जलए
भारत ृेरोजलयम ककृमरेिन जलजमटेड ृूणातया उत्तरिायी िोगा और ृाइृलाइन से सम्बजन्ित दकसी भी मामले ृर
केन्रीय सरकार के जवप द्ध कोई वाि, िावा या कानूनी कायावािी निीं िो सकेगी ।
अन सूची
मंडल – मसंगरायकोंडा संभाग – ओंगोल जिला – प्रकािम राज्य - आंध्र प्रिेि
1
2
3
4
5
6
गांव
सवे नंबर
सब-जडवी
सं.
क्षेत्रफल
िेक्टेयरर
एयर
वगा मीटर
मसंगारायकोंडा नं.
64
357- निर
2
00
02
71
357
1
00
10
18
356- मछली तालाब
1
00
13
43
355- निर
--
00
07
60
344
--
00
21
55
345AW/सरकारी िमीन
00
07
94
346
9
00
03
85
346
1
00
17
41
343
8
00
10
71
342
11
00
16
31
342
10
00
11
10
336
1
00
24
75
337
2
00
13
59
337
1
00
20
42
322
--
00
34
53
324
--
00
20
66
2566 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
325
--
00
18
71
326
--
00
19
78
315
--
00
63
81
314
--
00
07
46
313
--
00
26
89
311
--
00
08
53
क ल
03
81
92
सोमाराझ ृल्ले नं.
60
479-ृजिल सड़क
--
00
01
43
478
2
00
36
39
478
1 ए 1
00
25
27
478
1बी
00
71
05
477
1&2
00
16
81
470- सड़क
--
00
14
11
469
--
00
45
28
464
--
00
69
32
466
4
00
36
46
466
2
00
15
70
466
3
00
01
51
466
1
00
20
10
467
3
00
06
58
450
00
17
13
449
1
00
19
84
467
2
00
03
42
446
21
00
22
16
415
--
00
56
47
414- निर
--
00
04
45
278
3
00
34
98
281- तालाब
2बी
00
17
78
281- तालाब
1
00
19
04
281
2ए
00
07
96
282
2
00
01
92
280
1
00
24
76
283
--
00
23
44
264- निर
--
00
04
02
265
00
25
47
267
00
05
22
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2567
261- निर
--
00
05
22
260
2
00
77
74
260
1
00
14
46
200- निर
--
00
02
76
199- निर
--
00
00
02
198
--
00
24
26
202
1
00
01
00
196- निर
--
00
02
47
197
--
00
08
84
195
--
00
06
11
194- निर
--
00
00
44
193
00
02
22
190- निर
--
00
01
34
188
2बी
00
03
68
189- डोंका
--
00
07
75
148
3
00
03
56
148- सड़क
2
00
01
22
148
1
00
04
95
150
--
00
01
00
149
4
00
15
32
149
3
00
14
06
151
1
00
12
48
118
-
00
16
89
115
2
00
07
21
115
1
00
05
38
116
3
00
11
83
116
2
00
01
00
71- निर
--
00
01
33
73
2
00
14
74
74
2
00
04
88
74
1
00
15
84
73
1बी
00
03
93
73
1ए
00
04
29
75- निर
--
00
01
20
55- टंकी
--
00
00
99
41
1
00
22
94
41
2
00
04
74
42- टंकी
2
00
09
94
2568 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
42
1
00
10
36
43- निर
--
00
01
71
44
4
00
05
30
32- टंकी
--
00
11
00
31- टंकी
--
00
01
39
21- डोंका
--
00
01
39
20 डोंका
--
00
07
59
19 टंकी
--
00
16
52
14 टंकी
--
00
11
41
13 टंकी
--
00
08
31
1
--
01
22
96
8- टंकी
--
00
04
04
4
2D2
00
35
32
4
1
00
35
62
5
--
00
09
64
2
3
00
29
42
क ल
12
98
08
ृकाला नं. 61
280 & 283
1ए
00
10
72
281
3बी
00
15
32
281
3ए
00
05
13
281
2
00
10
29
281
1
00
11
72
282
--
00
18
80
280 & 283- सड़क
2ए
00
03
52
280 & 283
2ए
00
50
09
280 & 283- सड़क
1बी
00
02
90
280 & 283
2बी
00
06
03
278
1
00
16
31
239- निी
--
00
24
20
क ल
01
75
03
[फा. सं. आर-11025(15)/1/2021-ओआर-1/ई-37744]
ृी. सोमाक मार, अवर सजचव
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2569
New Delhi, the 29th November, 2022
S.O. 1223.—Whereas by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and
Natural Gas S.O. NO.4050(E) dated the 21stAugust, 2021 issued under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the
Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter
referred to as the said Act), published in the weekly Gazette of India Extraordinary No.3716, 1st October, 2021
the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule
appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Krishnapatnam - Hyderabad Pipeline for transportation
of Petroleum products from Krishnapatnam (SPSR Nellore, Andhra Pradesh) to Madharam near Hyderabad
(Ranga Reddy, Telangana) by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;
And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to
22nd December, 2021;
And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act submitted
report to the Central Government;
And whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the
said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire the right of user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the
Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to this
notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the
Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of
vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of the publication of the declaration, in Bharat Petroleum
Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of
Section 10 of the P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central
Government on any matter relating to the pipeline.
SCHEDULE
Mandal: Singarayakonda
Revenue Division: Ongole
District: Prakasam
State: Andhra Pradesh
1
2
3
4
5
6
Name of the Village
Survey No.
Sub-Divi-
No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
Singarayakonda N0.64
357-Canal
2
00
02
71
357
1
00
10
18
356-Aqua Pond
1
00
13
43
355-Canal
--
00
07
60
344
--
00
21
55
345
00
07
94
346
9
00
03
85
346
1
00
17
41
343
8
00
10
71
342
11
00
16
31
342
10
00
11
10
336
1
00
24
75
337
2
00
13
59
337
1
00
20
42
322
--
00
34
53
324
--
00
20
66
325
--
00
18
71
326
--
00
19
78
315
--
00
63
81
314
--
00
07
46
313
--
00
26
89
311
--
00
08
53
Total
03
81
92
Somarajupalle No.60
479-Foot Path
--
00
01
43
2570 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
478
2
00
36
39
478
1A1
00
25
27
478
1B
00
71
05
477
1&2
00
16
81
470-Road
--
00
14
11
469
--
00
45
28
464-Assessed Waste
--
00
69
32
466
4
00
36
46
466
2
00
15
70
466
3
00
01
51
466
1
00
20
10
467
3
00
06
58
450
00
17
13
449
1
00
19
84
467
2
00
03
42
446
21
00
22
16
415
--
00
56
47
414-Canal
--
00
04
45
278
3
00
34
98
281-Pond
2B
00
17
78
281-Pond
1
00
19
04
281
2A
00
07
96
282
2
00
01
92
280
1
00
00
01
280
1
00
24
76
283
--
00
23
44
264-Channel
--
00
04
02
265
00
25
47
267
00
05
22
261-Channel
--
00
05
22
260
2
00
77
74
260
1
00
14
46
200-Channel
--
00
02
76
199-Channel
--
00
00
02
198
--
00
24
26
202
1
00
00
96
196-Channel
--
00
02
47
197
--
00
08
84
195
--
00
06
11
194-Channel
--
00
00
44
193
00
02
22
190-Channel
--
00
01
34
188
2B
00
03
68
189-Foot Path
--
00
07
75
148
3
00
03
56
148-Road
2
00
01
22
148
1
00
04
95
150
--
00
00
39
149
4
00
15
32
149
3
00
14
06
151
1
00
12
48
118
-
00
16
89
115
2
00
07
21
115
1
00
05
38
116
3
00
11
83
116
2
00
01
00
71-Channel
--
00
01
33
73
2
00
14
74
74
2
00
04
88
74
1
00
15
84
73
1B
00
03
93
73
1A
00
04
29
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2571
75-Channel
--
00
01
20
55-Tank
--
00
00
99
41
1
00
22
94
41
2
00
04
74
42-Tank
2
00
09
94
42
1
00
10
36
43-Channel
--
00
01
71
44
4
00
05
30
32-Tank
--
00
11
00
31-Tank
--
00
01
39
21-Foot Path
--
00
01
39
20 Foot Path
--
00
07
59
19 Tank
--
00
16
52
14 Tank
--
00
11
41
13 Tank
--
00
08
31
1
--
01
22
96
8-Tank
--
00
04
04
4
2D2
00
35
32
4
1
00
35
62
5
--
00
09
64
2
3
00
29
42
Total
12
98
08
Pakala No.61
280 & 283
1A
00
10
72
281
3B
00
15
32
281
3A
00
05
13
281
2
00
10
29
281
1
00
11
72
282
--
00
18
80
280 & 283 Road
2A
00
03
52
280 & 283
2A
00
50
09
280 & 283-Road
1B
00
02
90
280 & 283
2B
00
06
03
278
1
00
16
31
239-River
--
00
24
20
Total
01
75
03
[F. No. R-11025(15)/1/2021-OR-1/E-37744]
P. SOMAKUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1224.—केन्रीय सरकार ने ृेरोजलयम और जनि ृाइृलाइन (भूजम में उृयोगकताा के अजिकार
का अिान) अजिजनयम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके ृश्चात उि अजिजनयम किा गया िज दक िारा) की
िारा 3 की उृ-िारा (1), के अिीन िारी की गई भारत सरकार के ृेरोजलयम और प्राकषजतक गजस मंत्रालय की
अजिसूचना सं्या का. आ. 4048 दिनांक 13 अगस्ट्त 2021 िो भारत के साप्ताजिक रािृत्र सं्या का. आ. 3714.
1 अक्टूबर, 2021 में प्रकाजित की गई ी द्वारा उस अजिसूचना से संलग्न अन सूची में जवजनर्िाष्ट भूजम में कष्णाृटनम
आंध्र प्रिेि से िजिराबाि तेलंगाना राज्य तक ृेरोजलयम उत्ृािों के ृट्ररविन के जलए कष्णाृटनम-िजिराबाि
ृाइृलाइन ृट्ररयोिना के माध्यम से भारत ृेरोजलयम ककृमरेिन जलजमटेड द्वारा ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के प्रयोिन के
जलए उृयोग के अजिकार का अिान के अृने आिय की घोषणा की ी;
और उि रािृत्र अजिसूचना की प्रजतयां िनता को दिनांक 30 नवंबर, 2021 तक उृलब्ि करा िी गई
ी;
और सक्षम प्राजिकारी ने, उि अजिजनयम की िारा 6 की उृ-िारा (1) के अिीन केन्रीय सरकार को
अृनी ट्ररृोटा िे िी िज;
2572 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
और केन्रीय सरकार ने, उि ट्ररृोटा ृर जवचार करने के ृश्चात् और यि समािान िो िाने ृर दक उि भूजम
ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के जलये अृेजक्षत िज, उसमें उृयोग के अजिकार का अिान करने का जवजनजश्चय दकया िज;
अतः अब, केन्रीय सरकार उि अजिजनयम की िारा 6 की उृ-िारा (1) द्वारा प्रित्त िजियों का प्रयोग
करते हुए यि घोषणा करती िज दक इस अजिसूचना से संलग्न अन सूची में जवजनर्िाष्ट भूजम में ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के
जलए उृयोग के अजिकार का अिान दकया िाए;
और केन्रीय सरकार उि अजिजनयम की िारा 6 की उृ-िारा (4) द्वारा प्रित्त िजियों का प्रयोग करते हुए,
यि जनिेि िेती िज दक उि भूजम में उृयोग का अजिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकािन की दिनांक से केन्रीय सरकार में
जनजित िोने की बिाए, सभी जवल्लंगमों से म ि िोकर भारत ृेरोजलयम ककृमरेिन जलजमटेड में जनजित िोगी।
ृेरोजलयम और जनि ृाइृलाइन अजिजनयम, 1962 की िारा 10 के अिीन दकसी भी क्षजतृूर्ता के जलए
भारत ृेरोजलयम ककृमरेिन जलजमटेड ृूणातया उत्तरिायी िोगा और ृाइृलाइन से सम्बजन्ित दकसी भी मामले ृर
केन्रीय सरकार के जवप द्ध कोई वाि, िावा या कानूनी कायावािी निीं िो सकेगी।
अन सूची
मंडल – ग द्ल रु संभाग – कंि क रो जिला – एस.ृी.एस.आर. नेल्लोर राज्य - आंध्र प्रिेि
1
2
3
4
5
6
गांव
सवे नंबर
सब-जडवी सं.
क्षेत्रफल
िेक्टेयरर
एयर
वगा मीटर
चेवरु नं. 122
529
5
00
01
00
527- नाला (नाली)
--
00
00
79
520
--
00
01
00
526
--
00
30
49
521
2
00
29
64
525
--
00
01
00
522
--
00
14
02
507
4
00
02
93
523
--
00
19
38
507
2
00
06
49
507
1
00
10
32
506
--
00
16
53
505
--
00
17
30
504
2
00
07
35
504
1
00
06
66
503
2
00
16
63
538- नाली
--
00
01
66
543
3
00
06
86
543
1
00
11
81
548
--
00
12
52
549
--
00
08
72
346
--
00
13
21
347
--
00
06
72
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2573
349
--
00
14
89
338
--
00
12
48
339
2
00
09
19
340
--
00
01
00
339
1
00
21
37
280
--
00
03
55
281
2
00
06
60
282
2
00
13
06
331
--
00
02
01
330
--
00
06
90
329- नाली
--
00
01
20
328
--
00
11
53
326
--
00
11
62
323
--
00
11
37
289
--
00
03
39
290
--
00
09
95
291
1
00
06
24
293
--
00
06
71
294
--
00
03
48
295
--
00
11
85
297- नाली
--
00
00
65
306
--
00
06
63
305
--
00
05
89
304- नाली
--
00
00
84
299
--
00
08
47
300
--
00
11
04
301- तालाब
--
00
01
04
245- डोंका
--
00
03
47
122
--
00
08
72
121- निर
--
00
00
85
120
--
00
15
46
119
--
00
12
15
118
1
00
05
59
118
2
00
04
46
117
--
00
06
41
2574 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
116- नाली
--
00
01
08
142
--
00
12
14
144
--
00
17
88
150
--
00
15
18
173- नाला (नाली)
--
00
01
08
172
2
00
04
01
171- नाली
--
00
01
13
170
--
00
01
99
169
--
00
08
03
168
--
00
05
19
167
--
00
01
00
964
--
00
01
97
963
--
00
57
13
163
--
00
33
00
क ल
06
63
90
रव रु नं. 121
219
2
00
26
88
221- आर & बी सड़क
--
00
02
69
321- टंकी
--
02
58
83
321- टंकी
--
00
01
31
604- वन
--
03
25
20
627- आर & बी सड़क
--
00
04
15
627- आर & बी सड़क
--
00
04
86
क ल
06
23
92
मोचेरला
674
--
00
32
84
नं. 119
656
3
00
56
59
540
2
00
72
05
540
3
00
06
14
540- सड़क
3
00
01
56
537
--
00
08
17
536
--
00
31
37
538
--
00
12
95
639
--
00
37
71
638
--
00
32
13
637
--
00
31
77
636
--
00
01
00
517
1
00
28
40
516
--
00
04
86
519
2
00
29
89
512
--
00
21
65
511
1
00
01
00
690
--
00
16
12
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2575
689
1
00
10
68
689
2
00
16
15
688
1
00
27
10
654
--
00
31
15
495
--
00
14
82
494
--
00
22
20
493
1
00
05
27
652
--
00
06
71
563- वन
--
01
75
33
563- नाला (वन)
--
00
04
55
564
--
00
27
15
565
--
00
45
35
568
--
00
13
42
क ल
08
26
08
[फा. सं. आर-11025(15)/1/2021-ओआर-1/ई-37744]
ृी. सोमाक मार, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 29th November, 2022
S.O. 1224.—Whereas by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and
Natural Gas S.O. NO.4048(E) dated the 13th August, 2021 issued under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the
Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter
referred to as the said Act), published in the weekly Gazette of India Extraordinary No.3714, 1st October, 2021
the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule
appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Krishnapatnam-Hyderabad Pipeline for transportation of
Petroleum products from Krishnapatnam (SPSR Nellore, Andhra Pradesh) to Madharam near Hyderabad
(Ranga Reddy, Telangana) by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;
And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 30th
November, 2021;
And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act submitted
report to the Central Government;
And whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the
said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire the right of user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the
Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to this
notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the
Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of
vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of the publication of the declaration, in Bharat Petroleum
Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of
Section 10 of the P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central
Government on any matter relating to the pipeline.
2576 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
SCHEDULE
Mandal: Gudluru Revenue Division:Kandukur
District:S.P.S.R. Nellore State: Andhra Pradesh
1
2
3
4
5
6
Name of the village
Survey No.
Sub-
Divi-
No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
Chevuru
No.122
529
5
00
01
00
527-NALA CHANNEL
--
00
00
79
520
--
00
01
00
526
--
00
30
49
521
2
00
29
64
525
--
00
01
00
522
--
00
14
02
507
4
00
02
93
523
--
00
19
38
507
2
00
06
49
507
1
00
10
32
506
--
00
16
53
505
--
00
17
30
504
2
00
07
35
504
1
00
06
66
503
2
00
16
63
538-CHANNEL
--
00
01
66
543
3
00
06
86
543
1
00
11
81
548
--
00
12
52
549
--
00
08
72
346
--
00
13
21
347
--
00
06
72
349
--
00
14
89
338
--
00
12
48
339
2
00
09
19
340
--
00
01
00
339
1
00
21
37
280
--
00
03
55
281
2
00
06
60
282
2
00
13
06
331
--
00
02
01
330
--
00
06
90
329-CHANNEL
--
00
01
20
328
--
00
11
53
326
--
00
11
62
323
--
00
11
37
289
--
00
03
39
290
--
00
09
95
291
1
00
06
24
293
--
00
06
71
294
--
00
03
48
295
--
00
11
85
297-CHANNEL
--
00
00
65
306
--
00
06
63
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2577
305
--
00
05
89
304-CHANNEL
--
00
00
84
299
--
00
08
47
300
--
00
11
04
301-POND
--
00
01
04
245-DONKA
--
00
03
47
122
--
00
08
72
121-CANAL
--
00
00
85
120
--
00
15
46
119
--
00
12
15
118
1
00
05
59
118
2
00
04
46
117
--
00
06
41
116-CHANNEL
--
00
01
08
142
--
00
12
14
144
--
00
17
88
150
--
00
15
18
173-NALA-CHANNEL
--
00
01
08
172
2
00
04
01
171-CHANNEL
--
00
01
13
170
--
00
01
99
169
--
00
08
03
168
--
00
05
19
167
--
00
01
00
964
--
00
01
97
963
--
00
57
13
163
--
00
33
00
Total
06
63
90
Ravuru
No.121
219
2
00
26
88
221-R & B ROAD
--
00
02
69
321-TANK
--
02
58
83
321-TANK
--
00
01
31
604-FOREST
--
03
25
20
627-R & B ROAD
--
00
04
15
627-R & B ROAD
--
00
04
86
Total
06
23
92
Mocherla
No.119
674
--
00
32
84
656
3
00
56
59
540
2
00
72
05
540
3
00
06
14
540-ROAD
3
00
01
56
537
--
00
08
17
536
--
00
31
37
538
--
00
12
95
639
--
00
37
71
638
--
00
32
13
637
--
00
31
77
636
--
00
01
00
517
1
00
28
40
2578 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
516
--
00
04
86
519
2
00
29
89
512
--
00
21
65
511
1
00
01
00
690
--
00
16
12
689
1
00
10
68
689
2
00
16
15
688
1
00
27
10
654
--
00
31
15
495
--
00
14
82
494
--
00
22
20
493
1
00
05
27
652
--
00
06
71
563-FOREST
--
01
75
33
563-NALA(FOREST)
--
00
04
55
564
--
00
27
15
565
--
00
45
35
568
--
00
13
42
Total
08
26
08
[F. No. R-11025(15)/1/2021-OR-1/E-37744]
P. SOMAKUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1225.—केन्रीय सरकार ने ृेरोजलयम और जनि ृाइृलाइन (भूजम में उृयोग के अजिकार का
अिान) अजिजनयम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके ृश्चात उि अजिजनयम किा गया िज) की िारा 3 की
उृ-िारा (1)के अिीन िारी की गई भारत सरकार के ृेरोजलयम और प्राकषजतक गजस मंत्रालय की अजिसूचना सं्या
का.आ. 4049(अ) दिनांक 23 अगस्ट्त, 2021 िो भारत के साप्ताजिक रािृत्र 1अक्टूबर, 2021 में प्रकाजित की गई
ी द्वारा उस अजिसूचना से संलग्न अन सूची में जवजनर्िाष्ट भूजम में कष्णाृटनम आंध्र प्रिेि से िजिराबाि तेलंगाना राज्य
तक ृेरोजलयम उत्ृािों के ृट्ररविन के जलए कष्णाृटनम-िजिराबाि ृाइृलाइन ृट्ररयोिना के माध्यम से भारत
ृेरोजलयम ककृमरेिन जलजमटेड द्वारा ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के प्रयोिन के जलए उृयोग के अजिकार का अिान के अृने
आिय की घोषणा की ी;
और उि रािृत्र अजिसूचना की प्रजतयां िनता को दिनांक 31 अक्टूबर, 2021 तक उृलब्ि करा िी गई
ी;
और सक्षम प्राजिकारी ने, उि अजिजनयम की िारा 6 की उृ-िारा (1)के अिीन केन्रीय सरकार को अृनी
ट्ररृोटा िे िी िज;
और केन्रीय सरकार ने, उि ट्ररृोटा ृर जवचार करने के ृश्चात् और यि समािान िो िाने ृर दक उि भूजम
ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के जलये अृेजक्षत िज, उसमें उृयोग के अजिकार का अिान करने का जवजनजश्चय दकया िज;
अतः अब, केन्रीय सरकार उि अजिजनयम की िारा 6 की उृ-िारा (1)द्वारा प्रित्त िजियों का प्रयोग
करते हुए यि घोषणा करती िज दक इस अजिसूचना से संलग्न अन सूची में जवजनर्िाष्ट भूजम में ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के
जलए उृयोग के अजिकार का अिान दकया िाए;
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2579
और केन्रीय सरकार उि अजिजनयम की िारा 6 की उृ-िारा (4)द्वारा प्रित्त िजियों का प्रयोग करते हुए,
यि जनिेि िेती िज दक उि भूजम में उृयोग का अजिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकािन की दिनांक से केन्रीय सरकार में
जनजित िोने की बिाए, सभी जवल्लंगमों से म ि िोकर भारत ृेरोजलयम ककृमरेिन जलजमटेड में जनजित िोगी।
ृेरोजलयम और जनि ृाइृलाइन अजिजनयम,1962 की िारा10 के अिीन दकसी भी क्षजतृूर्ता के जलए
भारत ृेरोजलयम ककृमरेिन जलजमटेड ृूणातया उत्तरिायी िोगा और ृाइृलाइन से सम्बजन्ित दकसी भी मामले ृर
केन्रीय सरकार के जवप द्ध कोई वाि, िावा या कानूनी कायावािी निीं िो सकेगी।
अन सूची
मण्डल-ओंगोल
रािस्ट्व जवभाग -ओंगोल जिला-प्रकािम राज्य-आंध्र प्रिेि
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
गकव का नाम
सवे नम्बर
उृ- ण्ड
नम्बर
क्षेत्रफल
िजक्टेयर
एयर
वगामीटर
मंगलाररीृ र
नम्बर.162
30
2
00
08
58
26
5
00
05
73
26
4
00
19
27
26
3
00
09
34
26
2
00
07
90
25
3
00
01
02
24
2
00
23
65
24
1A
00
03
71
6
3
00
09
22
6
2
00
09
44
23
5
00
02
02
23
4A
00
06
19
7
1
00
30
74
8
3
00
11
94
8
2
00
06
04
2
2
00
01
00
1
5
00
07
56
1
4B
00
08
24
1
4A
00
02
33
1
3B
00
14
99
1- निर
3B
00
03
18
योग
01
92
09
यरािेरला
नम्बर161
386- कच्चारास्ट्ता
--
00
23
48
389- कच्चारास्ट्ता
--
00
08
25
2580 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
390- कच्चारास्ट्ता
--
00
02
79
393
2
00
08
95
393
1
00
11
61
392
2
00
35
30
392
1
00
01
00
314- निर
5
00
02
95
314
2
00
17
39
312
1
00
07
66
313
3
00
16
56
313
2
00
01
60
313
1
00
13
84
326
3
00
01
00
303-कच्चारास्ट्ता
-
00
03
24
304
5
00
04
47
304
7
00
05
09
299
10
00
05
63
299
8
00
11
46
299
7
00
05
48
298
2
00
20
73
298
1
00
08
97
297
3
00
19
09
288-नाली
-
00
02
01
275-नाली
-
00
16
37
274
3
00
13
00
274
2
00
08
07
271
2
00
01
21
274
1
00
20
10
273-कच्चारास्ट्ता
-
00
07
60
127
1
00
30
23
128
3
00
01
00
128
1
00
30
12
129
2
00
01
00
133
5
00
02
83
133
6
00
08
47
149
10
00
01
00
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2581
149
6
00
18
08
149
5
00
03
07
149
1
00
08
13
148
2A
00
01
08
148
1C
00
08
19
148- निर
1B
00
05
23
148
1A2
00
04
57
147
2A2
00
12
49
147
1A
00
00
61
153
4B
00
15
37
153
3B
00
01
78
153-निर
1B
00
02
20
154-नाला
2
00
05
82
154
1
00
27
13
6
3
00
01
78
6
2C
00
08
77
6-निर
2B
00
05
15
6
2A
00
08
91
5
3A
00
03
44
5
1
00
23
13
योग
05
44
48
सरवेरेड्डीृालेम
नम्बर160
92
3B
00
04
16
92
3A
00
14
49
91
3
00
01
00
90
4
00
14
43
90
3
00
05
05
84
7
00
10
12
84
6
00
01
85
84
3
00
03
19
84
4
00
05
42
85
3
00
04
99
85
2
00
05
59
85
1
00
12
42
2582 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
81
2
00
29
78
82
1B
00
13
72
82-निर
1A
00
01
00
79- नाली
--
00
06
50
76-नाली
--
00
17
06
77
3B
00
02
95
75
1
00
01
18
55
9B
00
16
82
55
1
00
02
07
55
2
00
12
03
57
2
00
16
61
57
1
00
07
40
60
2B
00
01
00
58-कच्चारास्ट्ता
--
00
05
29
11
7
00
01
00
11
6C
00
03
91
11
6B
00
01
00
11
6A
00
06
61
11
5
00
01
00
7
4
00
16
37
7
3B
00
07
96
7
3A
00
07
69
7
2
00
14
52
6-कच्चारास्ट्ता
--
00
02
48
योग
02
78
66
वेन्गाम िाृलेम
नम्बर159
16
13
00
01
89
16
12
00
22
75
16
10
00
04
26
16
6
00
20
41
योग
00
49
31
[फा. सं. आर-11025(15)/1/2021-ओआर-1/ई-37744]
ृी. सोमाक मार, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 29th November, 2022
S.O. 1225.—Whereas by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and
Natural Gas S.O. NO.4049(E) dated the 23rd August, 2021 issued under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the
Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter
referred to as the said Act), published in the weekly Gazette of India No.3715, 1st October, 2021 the Central
Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to
that notification for the purpose of laying Krishnapatnam - Hyderabad Pipeline for transportation of Petroleum
products from Krishnapatnam (SPSR Nellore, Andhra Pradesh) to Madharam near Hyderabad (Ranga Reddy,
Telangana) by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2583
And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to
31st October, 2021;
And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act submitted
report to the Central Government;
And whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the
said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire the right of user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the
Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to this
notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the
Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of
vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of the publication of the declaration, in Bharat Petroleum
Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of
Section 10 of the P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central
Government on any matter relating to the pipeline.
SCHEDULE
Mandal:Ongole Revenue Division:Ongole District:Prakasam State:Andhra Pradesh
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Name of the Village
Survey No.
Sub-
Divi-
No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
Mangaladripuram No.162
30
2
00
08
58
26
5
00
05
73
26
4
00
19
27
26
3
00
09
34
26
2
00
07
90
25
3
00
01
02
24
2
00
23
65
24
1A
00
03
71
6
3
00
09
22
6
2
00
09
44
23
5
00
02
02
23
4A
00
06
19
7
1
00
30
74
8
3
00
11
94
8
2
00
06
04
2
2
00
01
00
1
5
00
07
56
1
4B
00
08
24
1
4A
00
02
33
1
3B
00
14
99
1-Canal
3B
00
03
18
TOTAL
01
92
09
Yarajerla –
No.161
386-Cart Track
--
00
23
48
389-Cart Track
--
00
08
25
390-Cart Track
--
00
02
79
393
2
00
08
95
393
1
00
11
61
392
2
00
35
30
392
1
00
01
00
314-Stream
5
00
02
95
2584 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
314
2
00
17
39
312
1
00
07
66
313
3
00
16
56
313
2
00
01
60
313
1
00
13
84
326
3
00
01
00
303-Cart Track
-
00
03
24
304
5
00
04
47
304
7
00
05
09
299
10
00
05
63
299
8
00
11
46
299
7
00
05
48
298
2
00
20
73
298
1
00
08
97
297
3
00
19
09
288-Stream
-
00
02
01
275-Stream
-
00
16
37
274
3
00
13
00
274
2
00
08
07
271
2
00
01
21
274
1
00
20
10
273-Cart Track
-
00
07
60
127
1
00
30
23
128
3
00
01
00
128
1
00
30
12
129
2
00
01
00
133
5
00
02
83
133
6
00
08
47
149
10
00
01
00
149
6
00
18
08
149
5
00
03
07
149
1
00
08
13
148
2A
00
01
08
148
1C
00
08
19
148-Canal
1B
00
05
23
148
1A2
00
04
57
147
2A2
00
12
49
147
1A
00
00
61
153
4B
00
15
37
153
3B
00
01
78
153-Canal
1B
00
02
20
154-Canal
2
00
05
82
154
1
00
27
13
6
3
00
01
78
6
2C
00
08
77
6-Canal
2B
00
05
15
6
2A
00
08
91
5
3A
00
03
44
5
1
00
23
13
TOTAL
05
44
48
Sarvereddypalem No.160
92
3B
00
04
16
92
3A
00
14
49
91
3
00
01
00
90
4
00
14
43
84
4
00
05
42
85
3
00
04
99
85
2
00
05
59
85
1
00
12
42
81
2
00
29
78
82
1B
00
13
72
82-Canal
1A
00
01
00
79-Stream
--
00
06
50
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2585
76-Stream
--
00
17
06
77
3B
00
02
95
75
1
00
01
18
55
9B
00
16
82
55
1
00
02
07
55
2
00
12
03
57
2
00
16
61
57
1
00
07
40
60
2B
00
01
00
58-Cart track
--
00
05
29
11
7
00
01
00
11
6C
00
03
91
11
6B
00
01
00
11
6A
00
06
61
11
5
00
01
00
7
4
00
16
37
7
3B
00
07
96
7
3A
00
07
69
7
2
00
14
52
6-Cart track
--
00
02
48
TOTAL
02
78
66
Vengamukkapalem No.159
16
13
00
01
89
16
12
00
22
75
16
10
00
04
26
16
6
00
20
41
TOTAL
00
49
31
[F. No. R-11025(15)/1/2021-OR-1/E-37744]
P. SOMAKUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1226.—केन्रीय सरकार ने ृेरोजलयम और जनि ृाइृलाइन (भूजम में उृयोगकताा के अजिकार
का अिान) अजिजनयम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके ृश्चात उि अजिजनयम किा गया िज दक िारा) की
िारा 3 की उृ-िारा (1), के अिीन िारी की गई भारत सरकार के ृेरोजलयम और प्राकषजतक गजस मंत्रालय की
अजिसूचना सं्या का. आ. 4891 दिनांक 25 नवंबर, 2021 िो भारत के साप्ताजिक रािृत्र 29 नवंबर, 2021 में
प्रकाजित की गई ी द्वारा उस अजिसूचना से संलग्न अन सूची में जवजनर्िाष्ट भूजम में कष्णाृटनम आंध्र प्रिेि से
िजिराबाि तेलंगाना राज्य तक ृेरोजलयम उत्ृािों के ृट्ररविन के जलए कष्णाृटनम-िजिराबाि ृाइृलाइन
ृट्ररयोिना के माध्यम से भारत ृेरोजलयम ककृमरेिन जलजमटेड द्वारा ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के प्रयोिन के जलए
उृयोग के अजिकार का अिान के अृने आिय की घोषणा की ी;
और उि रािृत्र अजिसूचना की प्रजतयां िनता को दिनांक 31 िनवरी, 2022 तक उृलब्ि करा िी गई
ी;
और सक्षम प्राजिकारी ने, उि अजिजनयम की िारा 6 की उृ-िारा (1) के अिीन केन्रीय सरकार को
अृनी ट्ररृोटा िे िी िज;
और केन्रीय सरकार ने, उि ट्ररृोटा ृर जवचार करने के ृश्चात् और यि समािान िो िाने ृर दक उि भूजम
ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के जलये अृेजक्षत िज, उसमें उृयोग के अजिकार का अिान करने का जवजनजश्चय दकया िज;
अतः अब, केन्रीय सरकार उि अजिजनयम की िारा 6 की उृ-िारा (1) द्वारा प्रित्त िजियों का प्रयोग
करते हुए यि घोषणा करती िज दक इस अजिसूचना से संलग्न अन सूची में जवजनर्िाष्ट भूजम में ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के
जलए उृयोग के अजिकार का अिान दकया िाए;
और केन्रीय सरकार उि अजिजनयम की िारा 6 की उृ-िारा (4) द्वारा प्रित्त िजियों का प्रयोग करते हुए,
यि जनिेि िेती िज दक उि भूजम में उृयोग का अजिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकािन की दिनांक से केन्रीय सरकार में
जनजित िोने की बिाए, सभी जवल्लंगमों से म ि िोकर भारत ृेरोजलयम ककृमरेिन जलजमटेड में जनजित िोगी।
2586 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ृेरोजलयम और जनि ृाइृलाइन अजिजनयम, 1962 की िारा 10 के अिीन दकसी भी क्षजतृूर्ता के जलए
भारत ृेरोजलयम ककृमरेिन जलजमटेड ृूणातया उत्तरिायी िोगा और ृाइृलाइन से सम्बजन्ित दकसी भी मामले ृर
केन्रीय सरकार के जवप द्ध कोई वाि, िावा या कानूनी कायावािी निीं िो सकेगी।
अन सूची
मंडल – मदिृाड
संभाग - ओंगोल
जिला – प्रकािम
राज्य - आंध्र प्रिेि
1
2
3
4
5
6
गांव
सवे नंबर
सब-जडवी सं.
क्षेत्रफल
िेक्टेयरर
एयर
वगा मीटर
नेलात र नं. 77
469
--
00
04
74
470
--
00
24
45
477
--
00
01
33
464
--
00
03
61
478
--
00
21
51
479
1C
00
17
27
479
1A
00
03
63
480
2
00
01
97
480
1
00
16
55
480-निर
1
00
02
30
482
1
00
01
00
526-नाली
--
00
10
22
527-नाली
2
00
03
30
528-नाली
--
00
01
54
536
2
00
18
67
535
2
00
21
15
535
1
00
01
95
532
--
00
18
03
534-सड़क
--
00
03
25
545
--
00
10
65
546
--
00
39
07
547
--
00
12
79
योग
02
38
98
डोड्डावरम नं. 130
383
4
00
11
29
383
2
00
12
70
383
1
00
17
26
382
3
00
01
00
282-सड़क
3
00
05
09
283
2
00
07
67
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2587
285
3
00
22
90
284
2
00
09
64
284-निर
2
00
04
67
286
1
00
18
51
278
4
00
01
00
277
4
00
01
35
277-निर
4
00
04
08
277
3B
00
18
90
277
1A
00
03
93
276
1A
00
03
94
301-नाली
2
00
31
14
300
5
00
10
28
302-नाली
--
00
05
99
303
9
00
05
25
303
7
00
16
74
304
5
00
20
73
304-निर
5
00
02
17
304
2
00
07
55
304
1
00
06
95
305
5
00
01
36
305
4
00
10
89
305
3
00
01
37
308
3
00
08
37
308
1
00
19
30
262
--
00
40
69
260-कच्चा रास्ट्ता
--
00
03
35
251
4
00
27
74
252
1
00
05
04
250
4
00
23
66
247
1
00
25
40
249
3
00
08
87
249
2
00
01
00
249-कच्चा रास्ट्ता
1
00
02
95
योग
04
30
72
[फा. सं. आर-11025(15)/1/2021-ओआर-1/ई-37744]
ृी. सोमाक मार, अवर सजचव
2588 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 29th November, 2022
S.O. 1226.—Whereas by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and
Natural Gas S.O. NO.4891(E) dated the 25th November, 2021 issued under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the
Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter
referred to as the said Act), published in the weekly Gazette of India Extraordinary No.4522, 29th November,
2021 the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the
Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Krishnapatnam - Hyderabad Pipeline for
transportation of Petroleum products from Krishnapatnam (SPSR Nellore, Andhra Pradesh) to Madharam near
Hyderabad (Ranga Reddy, Telangana) by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;
And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to
31st January, 2022;
And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act submitted
report to the Central Government;
And whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the
said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire the right of user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the
Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to this
notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the
Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of
vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of the publication of the declaration, in Bharat Petroleum
Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of
Section 10 of the P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central
Government on any matter relating to the pipeline.
SCHEDULE
Mandal:Maddipadu Revenue Division:Ongole District:Prakasam State: Andhra Pradesh
1
2
3
4
5
6
Name of the Village
Survey No.
Sub-Divi-
No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
Nelatur No.77
469
--
00
04
74
470
--
00
24
45
477
--
00
01
33
464
--
00
03
61
478
--
00
21
51
479
1C
00
17
27
479
1A
00
03
63
480
2
00
01
97
480
1
00
16
55
480-Canal
1
00
02
30
482
1
00
01
00
526-Stream
--
00
10
22
527-Stream
2
00
03
30
528-Stream
--
00
01
54
536
2
00
18
67
535
2
00
21
15
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2589
535
1
00
01
95
532
--
00
18
03
534-Road
--
00
03
25
545
--
00
10
65
546
--
00
39
07
547
--
00
12
79
TOTAL
02
38
98
Doddavaram No.130
383
4
00
11
29
383
2
00
12
70
383
1
00
17
26
382
3
00
01
00
282-Road
3
00
05
09
283
2
00
07
67
285
3
00
22
90
284
2
00
09
64
284-Canal
2
00
04
67
286
1
00
18
51
278
4
00
01
00
277
4
00
01
35
277-Canal
4
00
04
08
277
3B
00
18
90
277
1A
00
03
93
276
1A
00
03
94
301-Stream
2
00
31
14
300
5
00
10
28
302-Stream
--
00
05
99
303
9
00
05
25
303
7
00
16
74
304
5
00
20
73
304-Canal
5
00
02
17
304
2
00
07
55
304
1
00
06
95
305
5
00
01
36
305
4
00
10
89
305
3
00
01
37
308
3
00
08
37
308
1
00
19
30
262
--
00
40
69
260-Cart Track
--
00
03
35
251
4
00
27
74
252
1
00
05
04
250
4
00
23
66
247
1
00
25
40
249
3
00
08
87
249
2
00
01
00
249-Cart Track
1
00
02
95
TOTAL
04
30
72
[F. No. R-11025(15)/1/2021-OR-1/E-37744]
P. SOMAKUMAR, Under Secy.
2590 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1227.—केन्रीय सरकार ने ृेरोजलयम और जनि ृाइृलाइन (भूजम में उृयोग के अजिकार का
अिान) अजिजनयम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके ृश्चात उि अजिजनयम किा गया िज) की िारा 3 की
उृ-िारा (1) के अिीन िारी की गई भारत सरकार के ृेरोजलयम और प्राकषजतक गजस मंत्रालय की अजिसूचना सं्या
का.आ. 4521(अ) दिनांक 29 नवम्बर, 2021 िो भारत के साप्ताजिक रािृत्र 1 अक्टूबर, 2021 में प्रकाजित की
गई ी द्वारा उस अजिसूचना से संलग्न अन सूची में जवजनर्िाष्ट भूजम में कष्णाृटनम आंध्र प्रिेि से िजिराबाि तेलंगाना
राज्य तक ृेरोजलयम उत्ृािों के ृट्ररविन के जलए कष्णाृटनम-िजिराबाि ृाइृलाइन ृट्ररयोिना के माध्यम से
भारत ृेरोजलयम ककृमरेिन जलजमटेड द्वारा ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के प्रयोिन के जलए उृयोग के अजिकार का अिान के
अृने आिय की घोषणा की ी;
और उि रािृत्र अजिसूचना की प्रजतयां िनता को दिनांक 31 िनवरी, 2022 तक उृलब्ि करा िी गई
ी;
और सक्षम प्राजिकारी ने, उि अजिजनयम की िारा 6 की उृ-िारा (1) के अिीन केन्रीय सरकार को
अृनी ट्ररृोटा िे िी िज;
और केन्रीय सरकार ने, उि ट्ररृोटा ृर जवचार करने के ृश्चात् और यि समािान िो िाने ृर दक उि भूजम
ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के जलये अृेजक्षत िज, उसमें उृयोग के अजिकार का अिान करने का जवजनजश्चय दकया िज;
अतः अब, केन्रीय सरकार उि अजिजनयम की िारा 6 की उृ-िारा (1) द्वारा प्रित्त िजियों का प्रयोग
करते हुए यि घोषणा करती िज दक इस अजिसूचना से संलग्न अन सूची में जवजनर्िाष्ट भूजम में ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के
जलए उृयोग के अजिकार का अिान दकया िाए;
और केन्रीय सरकार उि अजिजनयम की िारा 6 की उृ-िारा (4) द्वारा प्रित्त िजियों का प्रयोग करते हुए,
यि जनिेि िेती िज दक उि भूजम में उृयोग का अजिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकािन की दिनांक से केन्रीय सरकार में
जनजित िोने की बिाए, सभी जवल्लंगमों से म ि िोकर भारत ृेरोजलयम ककृमरेिन जलजमटेड में जनजित िोगी।
ृेरोजलयम और जनि ृाइृलाइन अजिजनयम, 1962 की िारा 10 के अिीन दकसी भी क्षजतृूर्ता के जलए
भारत ृेरोजलयम ककृमरेिन जलजमटेड ृूणातया उत्तरिायी िोगा और ृाइृलाइन से सम्बजन्ित दकसी भी मामले ृर
केन्रीय सरकार के जवप द्ध कोई वाि, िावा या कानूनी कायावािी निीं िो सकेगी।
अन सूची
मण्डल
म न्िलाम प
रािस्ट्वजवभाग
ओंगोल
जिला
प्रकािम
राज्य
आंध्रप्रिेि
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
गकव का नाम
सवे नम्बर
उृ- ण्ड
नम्बर
क्षेत्रफल
िजक्टेयर
िजक्टेयर
िजक्टेयर
भातलाृल्ले
नम्बर 93
296
1B
00
17
75
296-निर
1A
00
03
39
295-नाली
--
00
07
83
292-निर
2
00
02
03
292
4
00
10
31
292
3
00
14
79
292
1
00
16
14
291
1
00
30
49
289-कच्चा रास्ट्ता
5
00
03
31
289
1
00
28
12
288
1C
00
07
87
288
1B
00
07
83
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2591
288
1A
00
13
83
287
1A3
00
06
22
287-निर
1A2
00
03
85
287
1A1
00
23
96
279
2
00
22
98
280
3
00
01
00
280
1
00
34
53
264-कच्चा रास्ट्ता
6
00
01
08
264
2
00
16
92
265
4
00
20
14
265
2
00
13
38
265-कच्चारास्ट्ता
1
00
01
33
योग
03
09
08
कंम्भामृडू
नम्बर 93
127-सड़क
3
00
01
71
127
3
00
22
07
127
2
00
12
17
130
--
00
16
75
132
6
00
14
21
132
5
00
18
29
134
4
00
20
37
137
1C
00
10
10
137-निर
1B
00
03
96
137
1A
00
01
05
135-निर
3B
00
01
00
135
7A
00
01
30
135
6
00
09
51
135
5
00
10
40
135-कच्चा रास्ट्ता
1
00
01
95
120
4
00
06
10
120
2
00
09
44
120
1
00
07
26
119
--
00
21
99
88
7
00
10
53
88
5
00
06
46
88
4
00
08
92
88
2
00
16
43
88
1
00
01
17
114
8
00
01
00
2592 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
114
4
00
06
92
114
1
00
16
61
115
2
00
01
00
112-कच्चा रास्ट्ता
--
00
04
90
103
5
00
12
97
103
4
00
17
71
104
--
00
07
07
109
--
00
18
34
108
--
00
01
00
32
6
00
01
41
32
4
00
01
00
32
3
00
19
09
32
2
00
08
27
19
2
00
06
85
19
1
00
43
05
17
2
00
01
00
20
4
00
15
86
20
2
00
15
09
20
1
00
01
48
21
4
00
02
59
21
3
00
12
17
21
1
00
12
83
म्भमृाड
नम्बर 93
23
1
00
01
00
22
4
00
21
04
22
3
00
05
75
योग
04
89
14
[फा. सं. आर-11025(15)/1/2021-ओआर-1/ई-37744]
ृी. सोमाक मार, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 29th November, 2022
S.O. 1227.—Whereas by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and
Natural Gas S.O. NO.4890(E) dated the 25th November, 2021 issued under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the
Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter
referred to as the said Act), published in the weekly Gazette of India Extraordinary No.4521, 29th November,
2021 the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the
Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Krishnapatnam - Hyderabad Pipeline for
transportation of Petroleum products from Krishnapatnam (SPSR Nellore, Andhra Pradesh) to Madharam near
Hyderabad (Ranga Reddy, Telangana) by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;
And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 31st
January, 2022;
And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act submitted
report to the Central Government;
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2593
And whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the
said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire the right of user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the
Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to this
notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the
Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of
vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of the publication of the declaration, in Bharat Petroleum
Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of
Section 10 of the P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central
Government on any matter relating to the pipeline.
SCHEDULE
Mandal: Mundlamur Revenue Division: Ongole District: Prakasam State: Andhra Pradesh
1
2
3
4
5
6
Name of the Village
Survey No.
Sub-Divi-
No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
Bhatlapalle
No.93
296
1B
00
17
75
296-Canal
1A
00
03
39
295-Stream
--
00
07
83
292-Canal
2
00
02
03
292
4
00
10
31
292
3
00
14
79
292
1
00
16
14
291
1
00
30
49
289-Cart track
5
00
03
31
289
1
00
28
12
288
1C
00
07
87
288
1B
00
07
83
288
1A
00
13
83
287
1A3
00
06
22
287-Canal
1A2
00
03
85
287
1A1
00
23
96
279
2
00
22
98
280
3
00
01
00
280
1
00
34
53
264-Cart track
6
00
01
08
264
2
00
16
92
265
4
00
20
14
265
2
00
13
38
265-Cart track
1
00
01
33
TOTAL
03
09
08
Khambhampadu
No.93
127-Road
3
00
01
71
127
3
00
22
07
127
2
00
12
17
130
--
00
16
75
132
6
00
14
21
132
5
00
18
29
134
4
00
20
37
137
1C
00
10
10
137-Canal
1B
00
03
96
137
1A
00
01
05
135-Canal
3B
00
01
00
135
7A
00
01
30
135
6
00
09
51
135
5
00
10
40
2594 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
135-Cart track
1
00
01
95
120
4
00
06
10
120
2
00
09
44
120
1
00
07
26
119
--
00
21
99
88
7
00
10
53
88
5
00
06
46
88
4
00
08
92
88
2
00
16
43
88
1
00
01
17
114
8
00
01
00
114
4
00
06
92
114
1
00
16
61
115
2
00
01
00
112-Cart track
--
00
04
90
103
5
00
12
97
103
4
00
17
71
104
--
00
07
07
109
--
00
18
34
108
--
00
01
00
32
6
00
01
41
32
4
00
01
00
32
3
00
19
09
32
2
00
08
27
19
2
00
06
85
19
1
00
43
05
17
2
00
01
00
20
4
00
15
86
20
2
00
15
09
20
1
00
01
48
21
4
00
02
59
21
3
00
12
17
21
1
00
12
83
23
1
00
01
00
22
4
00
21
04
22
3
00
05
75
TOTAL
04
89
14
[F. No. R-11025(15)/1/2021-OR-1/E-37744]
P. SOMAKUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1228.—केन्रीय सरकार ने ृेरोजलयम और जनि ृाइृलाइन (भूजम में उृयोगकताा के अजिकार
का अिान) अजिजनयम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके ृश्चात उि अजिजनयम किा गया िज दक िारा) की
िारा 3 की उृ-िारा (1), के अिीन िारी की गई भारत सरकार के ृेरोजलयम और प्राकषजतक गजस मंत्रालय की
अजिसूचना सं्या का. आ. 4892 दिनांक 25 नवंबर, 2021 िो भारत के साप्ताजिक रािृत्र 29 नवंबर, 2021 में
प्रकाजित की गई ी द्वारा उस अजिसूचना से संलग्न अन सूची में जवजनर्िाष्ट भूजम में कष्णाृटनम आंध्र प्रिेि से
िजिराबाि तेलंगाना राज्य तक ृेरोजलयम उत्ृािों के ृट्ररविन के जलए कष्णाृटनम-िजिराबाि ृाइृलाइन
ृट्ररयोिना के माध्यम से भारत ृेरोजलयम ककृमरेिन जलजमटेड द्वारा ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के प्रयोिन के जलए
उृयोग के अजिकार का अिान के अृने आिय की घोषणा की ी;
और उि रािृत्र अजिसूचना की प्रजतयां िनता को दिनांक 31 िनवरी, 2022 तक उृलब्ि करा िी गई
ी;
और सक्षम प्राजिकारी ने, उि अजिजनयम की िारा 6 की उृ-िारा (1) के अिीन केन्रीय सरकार को
अृनी ट्ररृोटा िे िी िज;
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2595
और केन्रीय सरकार ने, उि ट्ररृोटा ृर जवचार करने के ृश्चात् और यि समािान िो िाने ृर दक उि भूजम
ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के जलये अृेजक्षत िज, उसमें उृयोग के अजिकार का अिान करने का जवजनजश्चय दकया िज;
अतः अब, केन्रीय सरकार उि अजिजनयम की िारा 6 की उृ-िारा (1) द्वारा प्रित्त िजियों का प्रयोग
करते हुए यि घोषणा करती िज दक इस अजिसूचना से संलग्न अन सूची में जवजनर्िाष्ट भूजम में ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के
जलए उृयोग के अजिकार का अिान दकया िाए;
और केन्रीय सरकार उि अजिजनयम की िारा 6 की उृ-िारा (4) द्वारा प्रित्त िजियों का प्रयोग करते हुए,
यि जनिेि िेती िज दक उि भूजम में उृयोग का अजिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकािन की दिनांक से केन्रीय सरकार में
जनजित िोने की बिाए, सभी जवल्लंगमों से म ि िोकर भारत ृेरोजलयम ककृमरेिन जलजमटेड में जनजित िोगी।
ृेरोजलयम और जनि ृाइृलाइन अजिजनयम, 1962 की िारा 10 के अिीन दकसी भी क्षजतृूर्ता के जलए
भारत ृेरोजलयम ककृमरेिन जलजमटेड ृूणातया उत्तरिायी िोगा और ृाइृलाइन से सम्बजन्ित दकसी भी मामले ृर
केन्रीय सरकार के जवप द्ध कोई वाि, िावा या कानूनी कायावािी निीं िो सकेगी।
अन सूची
मंडल – चीमाक ी
संभाग - ओंगोल
जिला – प्रकािम
राज्य - आंध्र प्रिेि
1
2
3
4
5
6
गांव
सवे नंबर
सब-जडवी सं.
क्षेत्रफल
िेक्टेयरर
एयर
वगा मीटर
चन्राृड़़ु नं. 142
108-कच्चा रास्ट्ता
6
00
01
07
108
3
00
17
54
108
2
00
24
42
108
1
00
02
61
106
8
00
18
89
106
7
00
11
88
106
6
00
15
67
106-निर
5
00
00
82
104
3
00
14
31
114
6
00
16
77
114
2बी
00
06
02
114
3सी
00
06
81
114-निर
2ए
00
04
48
114-कच्चा रास्ट्ता
1
00
01
62
115
2
00
05
49
116
1
00
28
66
94
3सी
00
60
03
93
4ए2
00
05
61
93-निर
4ए1
00
01
29
92
10
00
01
94
92
9
00
08
37
2596 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
92
8
00
08
37
92
1
00
07
01
90
3
00
45
90
68
4
00
01
00
90-कच्चा रास्ट्ता
2
00
00
92
68-कच्चा रास्ट्ता
1
00
00
62
90
1
00
01
00
69
5
00
10
42
58
6
00
20
16
58
3
00
16
19
58
2बी
00
11
30
59
6सी
00
04
84
59
5सी
00
01
00
59-निर
2बी
00
02
50
59
6ए
00
01
00
59
5ए
00
02
15
54
2बी
00
02
26
54
2ए
00
20
14
54-कच्चा रास्ट्ता
1
00
01
31
53
1
00
12
26
52
1
00
01
13
48
1
00
02
69
49
1
00
58
76
45
2
00
02
59
45-कच्चा रास्ट्ता
1
00
01
11
TOTAL
04
90
93
रंगासायीृ रम नं. 132
82
2ए
00
08
25
82
1ए
00
10
95
TOTAL
00
19
20
इल्ृाव ल प नं. 131
253
2
00
12
05
253
1
00
18
13
254
1
00
44
47
258
1
00
26
55
257-निर
7
00
00
07
257
6
00
10
26
257
5
00
07
38
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2597
257
2
00
07
93
257
3
00
02
35
257
1
00
19
62
235-सड़क
--
00
03
29
233
2
00
01
00
233
1
00
41
44
239
--
00
11
90
231
--
00
43
46
230
--
00
04
62
186-नाली
--
00
20
90
185
3
00
01
00
187
2ए
00
01
00
188
3
00
38
56
188
2
00
07
32
188
1
00
15
67
192
3
00
16
00
191
1
00
09
83
198
3बी
00
15
63
198
3ए
00
06
77
196
1
00
08
39
197
--
00
23
49
159-सड़क
3
00
02
67
160
3
00
15
53
150
3
00
23
07
150-निर
2
00
03
16
150
1
00
24
40
149
2
00
06
98
149
1
00
17
88
151
12
00
07
89
151
11
00
06
37
146
2सी
00
01
09
151
10
00
01
16
146
1सी
00
21
38
141
2
00
06
14
141
1सी
00
22
77
141-निर
1बी
00
02
64
2598 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
141
ए
00
01
15
140-निर
1बी
00
00
57
140
1
00
17
83
137
2
00
05
52
138-कच्चा रास्ट्ता
--
00
02
44
TOTAL
06
09
72
[फा. सं. आर-11025(15)/1/2021-ओआर-1/ई-37744]
ृी. सोमाक मार, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 29th November, 2022
S.O. 1228.—Whereas by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum 2 and
Natural Gas S.O. NO.4892(E) dated the 25th November, 2021 issued under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the
Petroleum and Minerls Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter
referred to as the said Act), published in the weekly Gazette of India Extraordinary No.4523, 29th November,
2021 the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the
Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Krishnapatnam - Hyderabad Pipeline for
transportation of Petroleum products from Krishnapatnam (SPSR Nellore, Andhra Pradesh) to Madharam near
Hyderabad (Ranga Reddy, Telangana) by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;
And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to
31st January, 2022;
And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act submitted
report to the Central Government;
And whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the
said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire the right of user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the
Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land, specified in the Schedule appended to this
notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the
Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of
vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of the publication of the declaration, in Bharat Petroleum
Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of
Section 10 of the P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central
Government on any matter relating to the pipeline.
SCHEDULE
Mandal: Chimakurthy Revenue Division: Ongole
District: Prakasam State: Andhra Pradesh
1
2
3
4
5
6
Name of the Village
Survey No.
Sub-Divi-
No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
Chandrapadu No.142
108-Cart Track
6
00
01
07
108
3
00
17
54
108
2
00
24
42
108
1
00
02
61
106
8
00
18
89
106
7
00
11
88
106
6
00
15
67
106-Canal
5
00
00
82
104
3
00
14
31
114
6
00
16
77
114
2B
00
06
02
114
3C
00
06
81
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2599
114-Canal
2A
00
04
48
114-Cart Track
1
00
01
62
115
2
00
05
49
116
1
00
28
66
94
3C
00
60
03
93
4A2
00
05
61
93-Canal
4A1
00
01
29
92
10
00
01
94
92
9
00
08
37
92
8
00
08
37
92
1
00
07
01
90
3
00
45
90
68
4
00
01
00
90-Cart Track
2
00
00
92
68-Cart Track
1
00
00
62
90
1
00
01
00
69
5
00
10
42
58
6
00
20
16
58
3
00
16
19
58
2B
00
11
30
59
6C
00
04
84
59
5C
00
01
00
59-Canal
2B
00
02
50
59
6A
00
01
00
59
5A
00
02
15
54
2B
00
02
26
54
2A
00
20
14
54-Cart Track
1
00
01
31
53
1
00
12
26
52
1
00
01
13
48
1
00
02
69
49
1
00
58
76
45
2
00
02
59
45-Cart Track
1
00
01
11
TOTAL
04
90
93
Rangasayipuram No.132
82
2A
00
08
25
82
1A
00
10
95
TOTAL
00
19
20
Ilapavuluru No.131
253
2
00
12
05
253
1
00
18
13
254
1
00
44
47
258
1
00
26
55
257-Canal
7
00
00
07
257
6
00
10
26
257
5
00
07
38
257
2
00
07
93
257
3
00
02
35
257
1
00
19
62
235-Road
--
00
03
29
233
2
00
01
00
2600 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
233
1
00
41
44
239
--
00
11
90
231
--
00
43
46
230
--
00
04
62
186-Stream
--
00
20
90
185
3
00
01
00
187
2A
00
01
00
188
3
00
38
56
188
2
00
07
32
188
1
00
15
67
192
3
00
16
00
191
1
00
09
83
198
3B
00
15
63
198
3A
00
06
77
196
1
00
08
39
197
--
00
23
49
159-Road
3
00
02
67
160
3
00
15
53
150
3
00
23
07
150-Canal
2
00
03
16
150
1
00
24
40
149
2
00
06
98
149
1
00
17
88
151
12
00
07
89
151
11
00
06
37
146
2C
00
01
09
151
10
00
01
16
146
1C
00
21
38
141
2
00
06
14
141
1C
00
22
77
141-Canal
1B
00
02
64
141
A
00
01
15
140-Canal
1B
00
00
57
140
1
00
17
83
137
2
00
05
52
138-Cart track
--
00
02
44
TOTAL
06
09
72
[F. No. R-11025(15)/1/2021-OR-1/E-37744]
P. SOMAKUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 1 दिसम्बर, 2022
का.आ. 1229.—केन्रीय सरकार को ऐसा प्रतीत िोता िज दक लोकजित में यि आवश्यक िज दक तेलंगाण
राज्य में ृेरोजलयम ृिा म के ृट्ररविन के जलए "दि्णृटनम–िजिराबाि ृजरोजलयम & ृजरोजलयम प्रोडक्टस
ृाइृलाइन ृट्ररयोिना” के दियान्वयन िेत भारत ृेरोजलयम ककृमरेिन जलजमटेड द्वारा ृाइृलाइन जबछाई िानी
चाजिए।
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2601
और केन्रीय सरकार को ऐसी ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के प्रयोिन के जलए आवश्यक प्रतीत िोता िज दक ऐसी
भूजम में िो इससे उृाबद्ध अन सूची में वर्णात िज, और जिसमें उि ृाइृलाइन जबछाई िाने का प्रस्ट्ताव िज, उृयोग के
अजिकार का अिान दकया िाए;
अतः अब, केन्रीय सरकार, ृेरोजलयम और जनि ृाइृलाइन (भूजम में उृयोग के अजिकार का अिान)
अजिजनयम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की िारा 3 की उृिारा (1) द्वारा प्रित्त िजियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उस भूजम
में उृयोग के अजिकार का अिान करने के अृने आिय की घोषणा करती िज
कोई व्यजि, िो उि अन सूची में वर्णात भूजम में जितबद्ध िज, उस तारी से जिसको इस अजिसूचना में य ि
भारत के रािृत्र की प्रजतयां सािारण िनता को उृलब्ि करा िी िाती िैं, इिीस दिन के भीतर, भूजम के नीचे
ृाइृलाईन जबछाए िाने के जलए उसमें उृयोग के अजिकार के संबन्घ में तेलंगाण राज्य के जलए सक्षम प्राजिकारी,
“कष्णृट्नम – िजिराबाि ृेरोएलूम & ृजरोजलयम प्रोडक्टस ृाइृलाइन ृट्ररयोिना‘ भारत ृेरोजलयम ककृमरेिन
जलजमटेड (बीृीजसएल), मकान सं्या 8-2-293/82/A/264-A, ृिला तल, रोड नं 10, ि ब्ली जिल्स िजिराबाि,
तेलंगाण – 500033, को जलज त ृजश्चमी क्षेत्र ृाइृलाइन्स प्रोिेक्ट्स को जलज त प ृ में आक्षेृ भेि सकेगा।
अन सूची
मंडल- जचटयाला
जिलाः- नलगोंडा
राज्यः- तेलंगाण
मौिा / ग्राम
सवे नंबर
सब-डीव
सं.
क्षेत्रफल
िेक्टेयर
आरे
वगा मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
तल्ला वेल्लेमला
233
-
00
16
12
234
-
00
34
84
272
-
00
52
47
270
-
00
33
18
रोड
-
00
03
70
269
-
00
36
30
276
-
00
09
36
267
-
00
46
12
266
-
00
40
60
265
-
00
13
92
[फा. सं. आर-11025(15)/2/2020-ओआर-1/ई-33881]
ृी. सोमाक मार, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 1st December, 2022
S.O. 1229.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government of Petroleum Products, that it is necessary
in the public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum Products Pipeline Originating from Krishnapatnam
to Hyderabad. Should be laid in the state of Telangana by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited.
And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it
is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and
which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum
and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government
hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person who is interested in the land described in the said Schedule may within twenty one days
from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under sub – section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act,
as published in the gazette of India, or made available to the general public. Object to the acquisition of the
Right of the users therein for earthening the pipe line under the land in the State of Telangana by BPCL. In
writing to the Competent Authority, Krishnapatnam - Hyderabad Pipeline Project Bharat Petroleum Corporation
limited, House No. 8-2-293/82/A/264-A, First Floor, Above Canara Bank, Road No. 10, Jubilee Hills, and
Hyderabad -500033.
2602 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
SCHEDULE
Mandal :- Chityala
District:- Nalgonda
State :- Telangana
Mouja / Village
Survey No.
Sub-
Division
No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Talla vellemla
233
-
00
16
12
234
-
00
34
84
272
-
00
52
47
270
-
00
33
18
Asphalted Road
-
00
03
70
269
-
00
36
30
276
-
00
09
36
267
-
00
46
12
266
-
00
40
60
265
-
00
13
92
[F. No. R-11025(15)/2/2020-OR-1/E-33881]
P. SOMAKUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 1 दिसम्बर, 2022
का.आ. 1230.—केन्रीय सरकार को ऐसा प्रतीत िोता िज दक लोकजित में यि आवश्यक िज दक तेलंगाण
राज्य में ृेरोजलयम ृिा म के ृट्ररविन के जलए "दि्णृटनम – िजिराबाि ृजरोजलयम & ृजरोजलयम प्रोडक्टस
ृाइृलाइन ृट्ररयोिना” के दियान्वयन िेत भारत ृेरोजलयम ककृमरेिन जलजमटेड द्वारा ृाइृलाइन जबछाई िानी
चाजिए।
और केन्रीय सरकार को ऐसी ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के प्रयोिन के जलए आवश्यक प्रतीत िोता िज दक ऐसी
भूजम में िो इससे उृाबद्ध अन सूची में वर्णात िज, और जिसमें उि ृाइृलाइन जबछाई िाने का प्रस्ट्ताव िज, उृयोग के
अजिकार का अिान दकया िाए;
अतः अब, केन्रीय सरकार, ृेरोजलयम और जनि ृाइृलाइन (भूजम में उृयोग के अजिकार का अिान)
अजिजनयम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की िारा 3 की उृिारा (1) द्वारा प्रित्त िजियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उस भूजम
में उृयोग के अजिकार का अिान करने के अृने आिय की घोषणा करती िज;
कोई व्यजि, िो उि अन सूची में वर्णात भूजम में जितबद्ध िज, उस तारी से जिसको इस अजिसूचना में य ि
भारत के रािृत्र की प्रजतयां सािारण िनता को उृलब्ि करा िी िाती िैं, इिीस दिन के भीतर, भूजम के नीचे
ृाइृलाईन जबछाए िाने के जलए उसमें उृयोग के अजिकार के संबन्घ में तेलंगाण राज्य के जलए सक्षम प्राजिकारी,
“कष्णृट्नम – िजिराबाि ृेरोएलूम & ृजरोजलयम प्रोडक्टस ृाइृलाइन ृट्ररयोिना‘ भारत ृेरोजलयम ककृमरेिन
जलजमटेड (बीृीजसएल), मकान सं्या 8-2-293/82/A/264-A, ृिला तल, रोड नं 10, ि ब्ली जिल्स िजिराबाि,
तेलंगाण – 500033, को जलज त ृजश्चमी क्षेत्र ृाइृलाइन्स प्रोिेक्ट्स को जलज त प ृ में आक्षेृ भेि सकेगा।
अन सूची
मंडल- नारायणृ र
जिलाः- यिादर भोंगीर
राज्यः- तेलंगाण
मौिा / ग्राम
सवे नंबर
सब-डीव
सं.
क्षेत्रफल
िेक्टेयर
आरे
वगा मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
6
ग ज्जा
92
-
00
31
65
93
-
00
03
01
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2603
87
-
00
02
47
88
-
00
40
55
86
-
00
35
91
82
-
00
19
17
79
-
00
56
53
65
-
00
04
35
64
-
00
27
06
63
-
00
35
82
62
-
00
57
27
61
-
00
38
21
रोड
-
00
01
26
324
-
00
34
02
323
-
00
38
97
320
-
00
44
64
318
-
00
18
10
सरवजल
458
-
00
44
67
455
-
00
07
89
नाला
-
00
03
71
465
-
00
16
08
466
-
00
63
18
467
-
00
46
98
रोड
-
00
01
38
364
-
00
49
50
363
-
00
31
14
रोड
-
00
02
26
362
-
00
25
38
360
-
00
57
68
नाला
-
00
08
47
515
-
00
28
66
516
-
00
35
38
518
-
00
04
70
517
-
00
43
48
311
-
00
90
36
285
-
00
57
96
284
-
00
41
13
283
-
00
26
37
कच्चा रास्ट्ता
-
00
02
01
2604 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
276
-
00
36
87
274
-
00
29
12
275
-
00
34
92
नाला
-
00
04
02
186
-
00
77
50
रोड
-
00
01
39
निेर
-
00
02
82
162
-
00
01
92
161
-
00
13
10
159
-
00
11
25
160
-
00
18
72
156
-
00
44
10
157
-
00
58
48
रोड
-
00
01
94
130
-
00
01
10
131
-
00
51
48
126
-
00
37
98
जडजस्ट्रक्ट रोड
-
00
03
42
124
-
00
23
58
123
-
00
07
02
110
-
00
00
58
120
-
00
66
68
119
-
00
31
30
जचजमरयाला
167
-
00
46
76
168
-
00
10
67
रोड
-
00
02
72
154
-
00
04
30
153
-
00
67
92
152
-
00
19
51
नाला
-
00
16
38
151
-
00
09
90
150
-
00
35
64
148
-
00
34
27
147
-
00
23
51
145
-
00
36
99
146
-
00
25
20
140
-
00
29
18
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2605
जडजस्ट्रक्ट रोड
-
00
04
41
139
-
00
08
47
138
-
00
34
73
135
-
00
63
09
ग ड्डी मलकाृ रम
नाला
-
00
03
69
54
-
00
17
10
57
-
00
34
74
60
-
00
44
82
नाला
-
00
03
74
58
-
00
01
63
59
-
00
60
16
मोिम्मिाबाि
278
-
00
10
35
266
-
00
89
30
276
-
00
40
03
269
-
00
51
30
268
-
00
17
70
267
-
00
43
90
259
-
00
03
95
265
-
00
15
93
264
-
00
17
31
263
-
00
47
78
[फा. सं. आर-11025(15)/2/2020-ओआर-1/ई-33881]
ृी. सोमाक मार, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 1st December, 2022
S.O. 1230.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government of Petroleum Products, that it is necessary
in the public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum Products Pipeline Originating from Krishnapatnam
to Hyderabad. Should be laid in the state of Telangana by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited.
And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it
is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and
which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum
and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government
hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person who is interested in the land described in the said Schedule may within twenty one days
from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under sub – section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act,
as published in the gazette of India, or made available to the general public. Object to the acquisition of the
Right of the users therein for earthening the pipe line under the land in the State of Telangana by BPCL. In
writing to the Competent Authority, Krishnapatnam - Hyderabad Pipeline Project Bharat Petroleum Corporation
limited, House No. 8-2-293/82/A/264-A, First Floor, Above Canara Bank, Road No. 10, Jubilee Hills, and
Hyderabad -500033.
2606 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
SCHEDULE
Mandal :- Narayanapur
District:- Yadadri Bhongir
State :- Telangana
Mouja / Village
Survey No.
Sub-
Division
No.
Area
Hectare
Are
Sq.mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Gujja
92
-
00
31
65
93
-
00
03
01
87
-
00
02
47
88
-
00
40
55
86
-
00
35
91
82
-
00
19
17
79
-
00
56
53
65
-
00
04
35
64
-
00
27
06
63
-
00
35
82
62
-
00
57
27
61
-
00
38
21
Road
-
00
01
26
324
-
00
34
02
323
-
00
38
97
320
-
00
44
64
318
-
00
18
10
Sarvail
458
-
00
44
67
455
-
00
07
89
Nala
-
00
03
71
465
-
00
16
08
466
-
00
63
18
467
-
00
46
98
Road
-
00
01
38
364
-
00
49
50
363
-
00
31
14
Asphalted Road
-
00
02
26
362
-
00
25
38
360
-
00
57
68
Nala
-
00
08
47
515
-
00
28
66
516
-
00
35
38
518
-
00
04
70
517
-
00
43
48
311
-
00
90
36
285
-
00
57
96
284
-
00
41
13
283
-
00
26
37
Cart Track
-
00
02
01
276
-
00
36
87
274
-
00
29
12
275
-
00
34
92
Nala
-
00
04
02
186
-
00
77
50
Road
-
00
01
39
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2607
Canal
-
00
02
82
162
-
00
01
92
161
-
00
13
10
159
-
00
11
25
160
-
00
18
72
156
-
00
44
10
157
-
00
58
48
Road
-
00
01
94
130
-
00
01
10
131
-
00
51
48
126
-
00
37
98
District Road
-
00
03
42
124
-
00
23
58
123
-
00
07
02
110
-
00
00
58
120
-
00
66
68
119
-
00
31
30
Chimiriyala
167
-
00
46
76
168
-
00
10
67
Road
-
00
02
72
154
-
00
04
30
153
-
00
67
92
152
-
00
19
51
Nala
-
00
16
38
151
-
00
09
90
150
-
00
35
64
148
-
00
34
27
147
-
00
23
51
145
-
00
36
99
146
-
00
25
20
140
-
00
29
18
District Road
-
00
04
41
139
-
00
08
47
138
-
00
34
73
135
-
00
63
09
Guddimalkapuram
Nala
-
00
03
69
54
-
00
17
10
57
-
00
34
74
60
-
00
44
82
Nala
-
00
03
74
58
-
00
01
63
59
-
00
60
16
Mahammadbad
278
-
00
10
35
266
-
00
89
30
276
-
00
40
03
269
-
00
51
30
268
-
00
17
70
267
-
00
43
90
259
-
00
03
95
265
-
00
15
93
264
-
00
17
31
263
-
00
47
78
[F. No. R-11025(15)/2/2020-OR-1/E-33881]
P. SOMAKUMAR, Under Secy.
2608 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
श्रम और रोिगार मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1231.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अन सरण में,
केन्रीय सरकार मुख्य काययकारी अधिकारी, छावनी पररषि, कानपुर छावनी, कानपुर नगर ; प्रबंधिक, मैससय पाथेया
धिटेधटटव एधि धसटयोररटी सर्वयसेज, नई दिल्ली के प्रबंितंत्र के संबि् जनयोिकों और राष्ट्रीय अध्यक्ष, अधिल
भारतीय सफाई मजिूर सधघ, कच्छ, (गुजरात), के बीच अन बंि में जनर्िाष्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa
Je U;k;ky;] कानपुर के ृंचाट (संिभा सं. 142 of 2019) को जैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दििाया गया है, प्रकाजित
करती िज जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 27.10.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल- 42011/52/2019- आईआर(डीयू)]
िी.के. धहमाधशु, अवर सजचव
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1231.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 142 of 2019) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal
cum Labour Court – Kanpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to The Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board, Kanpur Cantt. Kanpur Nagar;The Manager,
M/s Patheya Detective and Security Services, New Delhi and The National President, Akhil Bhartiya Safai
Mazdoor Sangh, Kachh,(Gujarat), which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central
Government on 27.10.2022.
[No. L- 42011/52/2019-IR(DU)]
D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI SOMA SHEKHAR JENA, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT KANPUR
Present: Soma Shekhar Jena HJS (Retd.)
I.D. No. 142 of 2019
No. L-42011/52/2019-IR(DU) dated 03.06.2019
BETWEEN
The National President,
Akhil Bhartiya Safai Mazdoor Sangh,
A-157, Shaktinagar, Gandhidham , Kachh,
Gujarat-370201
AND
1.
The Chief Executive Officer,
Cantonment Board, Kanpur Cantt.
Kanpur Nagar-208004
2.
The Manager,
M/s Patheya Detective and Security Services,
C-93, Mahavir Vihar, Sec-1, Dwarka,
New Delhi-110045
AWARD
This award arises in respect of the reference mentioned in the schedule stated below as received from
the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in letter No. L-42011/52/2019-IR (DU) dated 03.06.2019
SCHEDULE
1. ‘Whether the action of the management of CAntonment Board, Kanpur/ M/s. Patheya
Detective and Security Services in terminating the services of Sh. Veerendra Kumar
and 86 others as per Annexure-A of their representative dated 23.05.2018 due to
paucity of budget is just, fair and legal? if not, whether these workers are eligible for
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2609
their reengagement if demand raised by Military Headquarter ? If not, to what relief
and in what way these workers are entitled to?’
On receipt of notification, notices were issued to both the parties on 09th July 2019 fixing 30.07.2019
for filing of statement of claim. But none appeared on behalf of claimant workman though on the behalf of O.P.
management Authorised Representative filed authority letter on the date fixed.
On perusal of the record it is found that though several dates were fixed for filing the statement of
claim none appeared on behalf of the claimant workman before this Tribunal. Despite giving ample
opportunities to the claimant union for submitting statement of claim; the union failed to present the case before
the Tribunal. On 28.09.2022 the case was reserved for final award for non-appearance of the workers’ union.
From the aforesaid circumstances it is presumable that the claimant workman and the union are not
interested in prosecuting the case further before the Tribunal.
Hence in the given circumstances the reference stands disposed of as of ‘NIL’ award.
Parties are left to bear their respective costs.
Date: 14.10.2022
SOMA SHEKHAR JENA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1232.—औद्योधगक धववाि अधिधनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,
केन्द्रीय सरकार प्रबंधि धनिेशक, मैससय हहधिुस्तान फ्लोरोकाबंयन धलधमटेि, बंशीरबंाग, हैिराबंाि, के प्रबंधितधत्र के सधबंद्ध
धनयोजकों और महासधिव, हहधिुस्तान फ्लोरोकाबंयन धलधमटेि, कैजुअल वकयसय यूधनयन, सी/ओ एम/एस हहधिुस्तान
फ्लोरोकाबंयन धलधमटेि, बंशीरबंाग, हैिराबंाि, के बंीि अनुबंधि में धनर्ियष्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योधगक अधिकरण- सह-
श्रम न्द्यायालय-हैिराबंाि के पधिाट (सधिभय सध. 250/2014) को जैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दििाया गया है, प्रकाधशत
करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 15.11.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल -42011/102/2014-आईआर(िीयू)]
डी.के. जिमांि , अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1232.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 250/2014) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal
cum Labour Court – Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to The Managing Director, M/s Hindustan Flurocarbons Limited, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad and The
General Secretary, Hindustan Flurocarbons Ltd., Casual Workers Union, C/o M/s Hindustan Flurocarbons
Ltd.,Basheerbagh, Hyderabad, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central
Government on 15.11.2022.
[No. L-42011/102/2014-IR (DU)]
D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM -LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present: SRI IRFAN QAMAR Presiding Officer
Dated the 26th day of October, 2022
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 250/2014
BETWEEN:
The General Secretary,
Hindustan Flurocarbons Ltd., Casual Workers
Union, C/o M/s Hindustan Flurocarbons Ltd.,
1402, Babukhan Estate, Basheerbagh,
Hyderabad – 500 001
…. Petitioner
2610 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AND
The Managing Director,
M/s Hindustan Flurocarbons Limited,
1402, Babukhan Estate, Basheerbagh,
Hyderabad – 500 001.
…Respondent
Appearances:
For the Petitioner :
M/s. A.K. Jayaprakash Rao, M.Govind & Venkatesh Dixit, Advocates
For the Respondent :
Sri Y. Venkateshwarlu, Advocate
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L- 42011/102/2014-IR(DU)
dated 27.11.2014 referred the following dispute under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 requiring this
forum to decide the question:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of M/s. Fluorocarbons Limited, Hyderabad by refusing
to regularize 27 casual workers (as per annexure-II) is legal, fair and justified? If not, to what
relief the concerned workmen are entitled to?”
2.
On receipt of the reference this Tribunal has registered and numbered the reference as I.D. No.
250/2014 and issued notices to both the workman and the management. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner
union appeared before the court. Respondent did not appear before the court, hence, set ex-parte vide order
dated 21.12.2017. Subsequently, the Petitioner union adduced evidence, and advanced arguments. Further, an
ex-parte award was passed vide order dated 11.7.2019 and notified in the Gazette of India vide notification
dated 2.8.2019.
2.
Respondent filed petition to set aside the ex-parte award dated 11.7.2019 which was allowed by this
Tribunal vide order dated 23.9.2022, as such the present ID 250/2014 is restored.
3.
At this juncture, Petitioner and Respondent counsels filed a joint memo with the fact that in the
reference there were 27 casual workers and out of 27 casual workers 7 casual workers detailed below are
believed to be dead and that their family members identity is not known.
1.
N. Hemala
Token No.100019
Sl.No.5 of ID reference
2
P. Anjaiah
Token No.100056
Sl.No.13 of ID reference
3
N. Hema
Token No.100064
Sl.No.14 of ID reference
4
N. Namla
Token No.100081
Sl.No.20 of ID reference
5
V. Somla
Token No.100082
Sl.No.21 of ID reference
6
V. Ramulu
Token No.100083
Sl.No.22 of ID reference
7
R. Hobaiah
Token No.100084
Sl.No.23 of ID reference
4. It is further submitted by the Learned Counsel for both the parties that due to non-availability of proper
succession documents and for want of certificate of LRS of deceased claimants, they could not be substituted on
record in place of deceased claimants. Therefore, in view of the said circumstances, they are praying for
abatement of the matter of above mentioned seven casual deceased and to pass the order regarding rest of 20
casual workers. To that effect both parties filed a joint memo dated 23.9.2022. It was also stated therein that
during proceeding of the reference, both the parties have arrived at settlement in the present matter and prayed
to award the reference as per settlement order.
5.
Heard both sides. In view of the statement of both parties, the reference with regard to above
mentioned 7 deceased claimants is abated since their LRs are not substituted as per rules within the stipulated
time and the dispute does not remain survive regarding deceased claimants.
6.
In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the joint memo dated 23.9.2022 is allowed and
accepted. The case is closed as settled.
The reference is answered accordingly. Transmit.
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2611
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant transcribed by her and corrected by
me on this the 26th day of October, 2022.
IRFAN QAMAR, Presiding Officers
Appendix of Evidence
Witnesses examined for the
Witnesses examined for the
Petitioner
Respondent
WW1: Sri M. Arjun
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
Ex.W1: Original pay slips of workers (Pg. No.1 t o 41)
Ex.W2: Photostat copies of Employment Exchange card (pg. No.42 to 48)
Ex.W3:
Photostat copies of certificate of land acquired by the government and given to the
Respondent (Pg. No.49 to 53)
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1233.—औद्योधगक धववाि अधिधनयम (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय
सरकार महाप्रबंधिक, कधबंोधिया धमल्स, कोयधबंटूर,; उप महाप्रबंधिक (एिआर) नेशनल टेटसटाइल कॉपोरेशन धलधमटेि
कोयम्बंटूर, के प्रबंधितधत्र के सधबंद्ध धनयोजकों और महासधिव, कोयधबंटूर और पेररयार धजला रधवड़ पधिलाई,
रामनाथपुरम, कोयधबंटूर, के बंीि अनुबंधि में धनर्ियष्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योधगक न्द्यायाधिकरण सह श्रम न्द्यायालय
और ईपीएफ अपील न्द्यायाधिकरण-िेन्नई के पधिाट (सधिभय सध. 150/2019) को जैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दििाया गया
है,प्रकाधशत करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 15.11.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-42011/154/2019-आईआर(िीयू)]
डी.के. जिमांि , अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1233.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 150/2019) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal
cum Labour Court & EPF Appellate Tribunal–Chennai as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute
between the employers in relation to The General Manager, Cambodia Mills, Coimbatore, The Deputy General
Manager (HR) National Textile Corporation Ltd. Coimbatore and The General Secretary, Coimbatore & Periyar
Disttt Dravida Panchalai Ramanathapuram ,Coimbatore, which was received along with soft copy of the award
by the Central Government on 15.11.2022.
[No. L-42011/154/2019-IR (DU)]
D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT & EPF APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
CHENNAI
Present: DIPTI MOHAPATRA, LL.M. Presiding officer
I.D. No. 150/2019
Wednesday, the 29th June, 2022
BETWEEN
The General Secretary
Coimbatore & Periyar Disttt Dravida Panchalai
134/158, Pankaja Mills Colony
Ramanathapuram
Coimbatore-641045 …1st Party/Petitioner Union
2612 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AND
1. The General Manager
Cambodia Mills
Post Box No. 3504
Ondipudur
Coimbatore-641016 …2nd Party/1stRespondent
2. The Deputy General Manager (HR)
National Textile Corporation Ltd.
NTC House, PO Box No. 2409, 35-B
Somasundaram Mills Road
Coimbatore-641009
:
2nd Party/2nd Respondent
Appearance
For the 1st Party/Petitioner
:
None
For the 1st & 2nd Party Respondent
:
Advocates, M/s T.S. Gopalan & Co.
AWARD
The Central Government, Ministry of Labour & Employment vide its Order No. L-42011/154/2019-
IR(DU) dtd. 09.12.2019 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.
The schedule mentioned in that order is:
“Whether the action of the management of Cambodia Mills, an Unit of National
Textile Corporation Ltd. in denying promotion to Sri K. Palanisamy, Ticket No. 140
Simplex Tenter to higher grade is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the
concerned workman is entitled?”
2. On receipt of the above reference from the appropriate Government, the dispute on reference is
registered as ID No. 150/2019 and due notices were issued to both the parties for their appearance fixing the
case to 20.02.2020. None of the. parties appeared. The case was posted to several dates i.e. to 19.03.2020,
01.05.2020, 19.08.2020 and 16.11.2020. Neither Sri K. Palaniasamy himself nor the General Secretary of the
First Party Union appeared. Without resorting to any coercive action against the First Party Petitioner’s Union,
the Tribunal viewed sympathetically and sou-moto afforded adjournments (almost 5) in the year 2021
considering the prevailed tough situation of Pandemic COVID-19, The General Secretary of the First party
Union did not turn up. Not a single petition was filed for adjournment. However for the ends of justice, the
First party Union was afforded with some more opportunities by re-listing the case on 04.01.2022 and
03.02.2022. None on behalf First party Union nor Authorized Representative appeared or filed the Claim
Statement.
3. As such in view of the discussion held in preceding paragraphs it appears the First Party Union is not
interested to proceed with the case. The case is simply dragged to an extent of almost 3 years only due to non-
cooperation of the First Party Union by not appearing and participating in the proceeding. This Tribunal is
constrained to conclude the proceeding as it seems there exists no dispute in between the parties for
adjudication as per the reference.
In the result the ID case stands dismissed.
An award is passed accordingly.
DIPTI MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1234.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अन सरण में,
केन्रीय सरकार प्रबंधि धनिेशक, स्कूटर इधिया धलधमटेि, सरोधजनी नगर, लिनऊ के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों
और श्री दिनेश कुमार, और 54 अन्द्य, कामगार, के बीच अन बंि में जनर्िाष्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2613
Je U;k;ky;] कानपुर के ृंचाट (संिभा सं. 155/2019) को जैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दििाया गया है, प्रकाजित करती
िज जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 09.11.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल- 42011/115/2019- आईआर(डीयू)]
िी.के. धहमाधशु, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1234.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 155/2019) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal
cum Labour Court – Kanpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to The Managing Director, Scooter India Ltd., Sarojini Nagar, Lucknow and Shri Dinesh Kumar, & 54
others, worker which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on
09.11.2022.
[No. L- 42011/115/2019-IR(DU)]
D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL–CUM-LABOUR COURT KANPUR
Present: Soma Shekhar Jena Hjs (Retd.)
I.D. No. 155/2019
Ref. No. L-42011/115/2019-IR(DU) dated: 26.08.2019
BETWEEN
Sh. Dinesh Kumar, & 54 others,
Scooter India Ltd., Sarojini Nagar,
Lucknow -226008
AND
The Managing Director,
Scooter India Ltd., Sarojini Nagar,
Lucknow – 226008
AWARD
This award arises out of the Industrial Dispute referred this Tribunal by notification no. L-
42011/115/2019-IR(DU) dated 26/08/2019 issued by the Government of India Ministry of Labour and
Employment for adjudication. The reference received in this Tribunal is stated under the schedule
below:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of management of Scooters India Limited for keeping casual
labourer Sh. Dinesh Kumar and 54 others (as per annexure-I) who were appointed
against the permanent vacancies and performing as permanent workers but their
services were kept on contract agreement on renewal against the spirit of certified
standing order applicable upon the management of Scooters India Limited are just,
fair and legal and(2) Whether these workmen are entitled to equal scale at par
with the regular employees of the same category, besides their regularization. If
not, to what relief these workmen are entitled to and from which date”.
After receiving the reference notices were issued to the concerned parties, the claimants
workmen namely Dinesh Kumar, Lallan Singh, Satyabrat Yadav, Ram Singh Yadav, Raghvendra
Kumar Pal claiming to be the representatives of the workmen filed the statement of claim with
averments which is stated below in a summarized manner: It is averred by the claimants workmen that
they have successfully completed their training under the O.P. management. It is averred that the
management had given assurance that the claimants would be absorbed after short period but the
management resiled from the assurance given by the management following unfair labour practice the
workmen were deprived of getting benefits payable to regular and permanent employees and the
management took work from claimants workers as casual workers. It is stated that the O.P.
2614 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
management engaged the claimants as casual workers for long 13 years and treated them as contractual
workmen issuing appointment letters year by year. It is submitted that the certified standing orders
which are binding on the O.P. have no provision of the kind of employment of casual workmen. It is
specifically submitted that the claimants workmen were getting 18000/- per month whereas their
counter parts were allowed to draw scale of pay Rs. 9050-29000 of the scale Rs. 8600-27000 and
other perquisites w.e.f. 01/01/2007 and the wages of those allowed on graded pay amounted to Rs.
40,000/- per month. The claimants workmen have claimed that they fall in the category of high skilled
workmen concerning their duties and constituted essential work post of the establishment. Alleging
unfair labour practice adopted by the O.P. management claimants workmen have prayed for absorbing
them on permanent with regular scale of pay of artisans A & B Rs. 8600-27000 and Rs. 8200-25200
w.e.f. 01/01/2007 with other consequential relief.
Per contra written statement has been filed by the O.P. management which may be concisely
stated as follows:
The Industrial Dispute raised before this Tribunal is unsustainable on the ground that the claimants are
not legally authorized to raise the dispute. It is further stated that the industry of the O.P. is on closure process
by a resolution dated 28/11/2019 in tune with subsequent notification F.No. 3(1)/2020-PE-VI Dated 28.01.2021.
It is further stated that claimants were on engagement for contractual period and after the contract period their
service has not been extended in the establishment and they cannot be declared as permanent employees.
Indirectly the O.P. side has taken the stand that the termination of the claimants cannot be equated as
retrenchment.
In the rejoinder the claimants workman have reiterated their prayer and their averments made in the statement
of claim.
The following points are to be answered for adjudication of the Industrial Dispute:
1. Whether claimants workmen are legally entitled for absorption on permanent post in Scooter India Ltd.
(herein after stated in short as the SIL).
2. To what relief the claimants workmen are entitled.
In course of argument it was submitted on behalf of the O.P. side that the establishment is on
closing stage. In other words it is submitted on behalf of the O.P. side that Scooters India Limited
could not thrive in the present stage of competitive business and such a decision had already been
taken by the Government of India for closing the establishment (letter dated 28/01/2020). It is further
submitted on behalf of the O.P. side that the closure process has been started in November 2019 and
as such the whole litigation is afterthought. Against such contention adverted by the O.P. management
it is stated on behalf of the claimant side that no formal closure proceeding under section 25-O of the
Industrial Disputes Act has been initiated and no document in support of sickness of the establishment
has been proved. It may be correct that SIL is already one sick industrial establishment and
presumably, such establishment being in state of utter irrecoverable industrial sickness the Central
Government has taken a decision for winding up the establishment as found in letter no. 3(1)/2020-PE-
VI dated 28/01/2021. It may be correct that no notice of 90 days as enshrined in section 25-O of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has been issued by the employer side but for non compliance of the
provision contained in section 25-O the closure may be declared as illegal which is beyond the
purview of the reference proceeding. Be that as it may, looking at the realities as found from the
record the Scooters India Limited has already gone to the stage of irrecoverable sickness and from the
evidence of the workmen side it is not clear if they were appointed against permanent vacancies and
whether they were working as permanent workers. A long time has elapsed after their initial
engagement. Due to lack of evidence on the claim that the claimants were appointed against
permanent vacancies it cannot be concluded that the claimant were performing the job of permanent
workers with required efficiency. In such scenario it can be reasonably concluded that the action of
the management keeping the claimants as casual labourers of such a long period cannot be held to be
thoroughly illegal since there is no strong evidence that the claimants were working as permanent
workers against permanent vacancies.
A good number of case laws mentioned below have been referred by the workmen side In Civil Appeal No.
4840 of 2021 Neelima Srivastava Vs. State of U.P. and others, Civil Appeal No. 2413 of 1998 Municipal
Committee Tauru Vs. Harpal Singh and another, Civil Appeal No. 4755 of 2001 General Manager,
O.N.G.C., Shilchar Vs. O.N.G.C. Contractual Workers Union, Civil Appeal No. 1878 of 2016 Oil and
Natural Gas Corporation Vs. Krishna Gopal and others, Civil Appeal No. 10499 of 2011 Food Corporation
of India Vs. Gen. Secy, FCI India Employees Union & Ors., Civil Appeal No. 1381 of 2019 Chennai Port
Trust Vs. The Chennai Port Trust Industrial Employees Canteen Workers Welfare Association And Ors.,
Civil Appeal No. 7872 of 2011 Delhi International Airport Private Limited Vs. Union of India and others,
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2615
Civil Appeal No. 11010 of 1996 V.M. Chandra Vs. Union of India and others, Civil Appeal No. 10956 of
2018 Sabha Shanker Dube Vs. Divisional Forest Officer & Ors., Civil Appeal No. 4094 of 1998 Jawaharlal
Nehru Technological University Vs. Smt. T. Sumalatha and others, AIR 1987 Supreme Court 2049 M.P.
Thakkar and K.N. Singh, Civil Appeal No. 3715 (N.L.) of 1984 Sarva Shramik Sangh, Bombay Vs. Indian
Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. and another, Civil Appeal No. 4421 of 1986 Swadeshi Cotton Mills Vs. Labour Court I,
Kanpur And others, Civil Appeal No. 4460 of 2008 Workman, Through Hindustan Lever Mazdoor Sabha Vs.
Hindustan Lever Ltd., W.P. © Nos. 6522 and 6751 of 2012 Manoj Kumar and others Vs. High Court of
Delhi Rep. By Its Registrar and others, Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 30849 of 2002 U.P. State Road
Transport Corporation Vs. Ramesh Kumar Yadav and others, Civil Appeal Nos. 3209-3210 of 2015 Umrala
Gram Panchayat Vs. Secretary, Municipal Employees Union and others, Civil Appeal No. 4755 of 2001
General Manager, O.N.G.C., Silchar Vs. O.N.G.C. Contractual Workers Union.
To avoid prolixity it can be stated that the aforesaid case law have been pronounced in the context of
scenario which are evidently dissimilar from the circumstances of the case in hand. None of the aforesaid case
is related to any moribund industry.
It cannot be logically held that the claimants are entitled to get equal scale at par with regular
employees. The documents produced before the Tribunal on unmistakably show that Scooters India
Limited is already a dying Industrial establishment and the claim for regularization is unworkable but
on the other hand in cannot be brushed aside that after completion of training of two years the
claimants had worked almost for ten years with extension of their engagement year wise. It appears
that since they were non permanent casual workers they were not given any package. For the sake of
clarity it can be stated here that the claimants’ termination cannot be held to be retrenchment
coverable under section 2 (00) (bb) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 but as they have worked in SIL
they are entitled to get compensation which can be worked out on guess work. Keeping the said
workers on contractual engagement beyond ten years was unethical though the same cannot be treated
as thoroughly unfair labour practice. Actual compensation with mathematical accuracy cannot be worked
out. In the circumstances guess work can be resorted to for working out compensation. Keeping the whole
scenario into consideration it can be stated that the claimants are entitled to get compensation. Since
SIL is already in stage of irrecoverable sickness thriving with assistance of the Government huge of
amount of compensation cannot be awarded in favour of the claimants. Considering the whole scenario
as found from the record it can be logically held that the claimants are each entitled to get
compensation of Rupees One lakh each which shall be deposited into the account of the claimants by
the O.P. management within one month from the date of the publication of the award failing which
the claimants will be entitled get simple interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of the
award till the whole amount is cleared.
In view of the discussions stated above the reference is answered accordingly.
Parties are left to bear their respective costs.
SOMA SHEKHAR JENA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1235.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अन सरण में,
केन्रीय सरकार उप महाप्रबंधिक, पावर धिि कॉपोरेशन ऑफ इधिया धलधमटेि,कानपुर-(उ.प्र.); कनयल. कुधवर धशव
प्रताप हसधह, मैससय ऐस ऑफ स्पेड्स धसटयोररटी सर्वयसेज, मेरठ के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री राम
नारायण, कामगार, के बीच अन बंि में जनर्िाष्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] कानपुर
के ृंचाट (संिभा सं. 04 of 2020) को जैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दििाया गया है, प्रकाजित करती िज जो केन्द्रीय सरकार
को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 09.11.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल- 42025/07/2022-32-आईआर(डीयू)]
िी.के. धहमाधशु, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1235.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 04 of 2020) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal
cum Labour Court – Kanpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to The Deputy General Manager, Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd, Kanpur-(U.P);Col. Kunwar
2616 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Shiv Pratap Singh, M/s Ace of Spades Security Services, Meerut and Shri Ram Narain, worker which was
received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 09.11.2022.
[No. L- 42025/07/2022-32-IR(DU)]
D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI SOMA SHEKHAR JENA, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT KANPUR
Present: Soma Shekhar Jena Hjs (Retd.)
I.D. No. 04 of 2020
Notification No.K-10/2-3/2019-IR dated 21.01.2020
issued by the Dy. Chief Labour Commissioner(Central)
Kanpur
BETWEEN
Shri Ram Narain s/o Late Munni Lal, EWS,
F-69, K.D.M.A Road, Barra-8,
Kanpur-208027
AND
1. The Dy. General Manager,
Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd,
400/200, K.V. Sub Station, Kalpi Road,
Post- Chakarpur, Kanpur-209305(U.P)
2. Col. Kunwar Shiv Pratap Singh,
Prop, M/s Ace of Spades Security Services,
508-Begam Bagh, Near Upper India Dairy,
Meerut-250001.
AWARD
This award arises in respect of the reference mentioned in the schedule stated below:-
SCHEDULE
1.
‘Whether the action of management of Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd,
Chakarpur, Kanpur /M/s Ace of Spades Security Services, Meerut over alleged termination of
the services of Shri Ram Narain s/o Late Munni Lal, Security Guard w.e.f 01.10.2018, is fair,
legal and justified without complying of the provisions of Section 25 F of Industrial Disputes
Act,1947? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date?”
On receipt of notification, notices were issued to both the parties on 12th February 2020 fixing
28.02.2020 for filing of statement of claim. But none appeared on behalf of claimant workman on the date
fixed.
On perusal of the record it is found that though several dates were fixed for filing the statement of
claim none appeared on behalf of the claimant workman before the Tribunal. Despite ample opportunities to
the claimant workman for submitting statement of claim; the claimant workman failed to present the case before
the Tribunal. On 13.10.2022 the case was reserved for final award for non-appearance of the claimant workman.
From the aforesaid circumstances it is presumable that the claimant workman is not interested in
prosecuting the case further before the Tribunal.
Hence in the given circumstances the reference stands disposed of as of ‘NIL’ award.
Parties are left to bear their respective costs.
Date: 01.11.2022
SOMA SHEKHAR JENA, Presiding Officer
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2617
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1236.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अन सरण में,
केन्रीय सरकार क्षेत्रीय प्रबंधिक, राष्ट्रीय बंीज धनगम धलधमटेि क्षेत्रीय कायायलय, 65-पधिरीबंा, लिनऊ के प्रबंितंत्र के
संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्रीमती पुष्पा िेवी, कामगार, के बीच अन बंि में जनर्िाष्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार vkS|ksfxd
vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] कानपुर ृंचाट (संिभा सं. 114 of 2013) को जैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दििाया गया
है, प्रकाजित करती िज जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 15.11.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल- 42012/47/2013- आईआर(डीयू)]
िी.के. धहमाधशु, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1236.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 114 of 2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal
cum Labour Court – Kanpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to The Regional Manager, National Seeds Corporation Ltd. Regional Office, 65-pandariba, Lucknow
and Smt. Pushpa Devi, Worker which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central
Government on 15.11.2022.
[No. L- 42012/47/2013-IR(DU)]
D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI SOMA SHEKHAR JENA, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT KANPUR
Present: Soma Shekhar Jena Hjs (Retd.)
I.D. No. 114 of 2013
L-42012/47/2013-IR(DU) dated 21.08.2013
BETWEEN
Smt. Pushpa Devi , W/o Late Narain Singh,
House No. 43/280, Sikandra, Agra.
AGRA (U.P)-
AND
The Regional Manager,
National Seeds Corporation Ltd.
Regional Office, 65-pandariba,
Lucknow-226004.
AWARD
This award arises in respect of Industrial Dispute stated in schedule below communicated to this
Tribunal in notification no.L-42012/47/2013- IR(DU) dated 21.08.2013 issued by Government of India,
Ministry of Labour.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of National Seeds Corporation Ltd., Lucknow in
terminating the services of Smt. Pushpa Devi W/o late Narain Singh workman w.e.f
08.03.1999 is just fair & legal? To what relief the workman is entitled to?’
The averments of the claimant workman may be summarized as follows:-
Claimant workwoman was employed by the O.P management at its establishment Sikandra, Agra in
1996 without appointment letter. Where she worked till 07.03.1999 continuously. O.P management was having
the charge of the National Seed Corporation and Vegetable Processing Centre which comes under Government
of India and on the direction of O.P management claimant workwoman works in National Seed Corporation and
sometimes in Vegetable Processing Centre. Since the O.P management is a government entity hence as per
article 12 management is state. And at the time of appointment OP management failed to provide claimant
workwoman any kind of appointment letter, identity card, salary slip and neither her name was marked in
attendance register which is violation of law. On 08.03.1999 O.P management terminate the service of claimant
2618 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
workwoman orally without giving any notice or retrenchment. The termination of claimant workwoman is
illegal and is not as per the law. It is important to point out that at the time when the service of the claimant
workwoman was terminated many worker who are junior is still in the service. And not only they were in the
service but also the nature of their service is changed from temporary to permanent.Claimant workwoman
further prayed before the Tribunal that she should be re employed with back wages as her termination was
unlawful as no notice or notice pay or retrenchment was given hence it is violation of the section 25 F of ID
Act 1947.
The claimant work lady has prayed for reinstatement with continuity of service from the dated of
permanent absorption of her immediate junior along with wages for the period she was kept jobless.
In response to the statement of claim counter has been filed by O.P employer with averments which are
concisely stated as below:-
O.P management is in business of preservation, cultivation and purification of rabi and kharif crops by
employing workers from the market on temporary basis and on daily wages. The duration of above
mentioned task is one and half to two months at maximum. After completion of the task, employment
of temporary workers terminate automatically. For the above mentioned work there is no procedure of
issuing of appointment letter or termination letter. Hence the claimant work woman was never
provided with any appointment or termination letter. It is further mentioned by O.P management that
after economic liberisation of country in 1992 there is downsized in the post of group C and D hence
the claim of claimant work woman to made work without any appointment letter is false and baseless.
It is further mentioned by the O.P management that claimant workwoman was appointed only on
temporary basis and in no calender year claimant workman never worked for 240 days. It is further
mentioned that claimant work woman never worked even as temporary worker for the period of 1996
to 1999. It is stated by the O.P management that the claim of the claimant workwoman is baseless,
false and against the law hence should be rejected without any consideration.
The points to be answered in this proceeding are as follows:-
1. Whether termination of services of Smt. Puspa Devi w.e.f 08.03.1999 is legally fair and sustainable?
2. To what relief the claimant work woman is entitled?
Though statement of claim was submitted by claimant work woman and several dates were fixed the
claimant work woman did not appear before this Tribunal to depose her evidence. Law is well settled that the
pleadings of the workwoman cannot be read as substantive evidence. On the other hand on behalf of O.P
management several documents have been produced showing that the claimant work woman was engaged as
casual worker on daily wage. It is further pointed out by the O.P employer that in view of government of India
circular even regular employees were reduced by 50% by offering VRS ( voluntary retirement scheme). There
is nothing contrary to such proposition on behalf of claimant work woman. In the scenario it is presumable that
claimant work woman has no genuine interest to prosecute her case before this Tribunal. Further more a casual
worker is not legally entitled to be absorbed in permanent vacancy lest the same should amount to backdoor
entry . It is contended on behalf of O.P management that the claimant work woman was engaged on seasonal
assignment of rabi crop and paddy crop. Since the claimant work woman engaged as casual daily waged
labourer or termination cannot be treated as retrenchment. On her termination she is neither entitled to
retrenchment notice nor retrenchment pay. In view of the scenario stated above the NIL Award is passed in
respect of the reference.
Parties are left to bear their respective costs.
Let a soft copy be sent to the Ministry and two hard copies of the same will follow in due course of time.
Date: 07.11.2022
SOMA SHEKHAR JENA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1237.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अन सरण में,
केन्रीय सरकार धनिेशक, धशक्षुता प्रधशक्षण बंोिय (एनआर), लिनपुर,कानपुर नगर के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों
और श्री नरेश कुमार, कामगार, के बीच अन बंि में जनर्िाष्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2619
U;k;ky;] कानपुर के ृंचाट (संिभा सं. 12 of 2018) को जैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दििाया गया है, प्रकाजित करती िज
जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 10.11.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल- 42012/40/2017- आईआर(डीयू)]
िी.के. धहमाधशु, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1237.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 12 of 2018) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal
cum Labour Court–Kanpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to The Director, Board of Apprenticeship Training (NR), Lakhanpur, Kanpur Nagar and Shri Naresh
Kumar,Worker which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on
10.11.2022.
[No. L- 42012/40/2017-IR(DU)]
D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI SOMA SHEKHAR JENA, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT KANPUR
Present : Soma Shekhar Jena HJS (Retd.)
I.D. No. 12 of 2018
L-42012/40/2017-IR(DU) dated 29.01.2018
BETWEEN
Sh. Naresh Kumar S/o Sh. Shiv Balak Singh,
Village Karsui, Post-Kathara,
Thana Bidhnu,
Kanpur Nagar-209214
AND
The Director,
Board of Apprenticeship Training (NR)
Plot No. 16, Block 1-A, Lakhanpur,
Kanpur Nagar-208024
AWARD
This award arises in respect of the reference mentioned in the schedule stated below as received from
the Government of India, Ministry of Labour and Employment in letter no. L-42012/40/2017-IR(DU) dated
29.01.2018
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Director, Board of Apprenticeship Training
(N.R) Kanpur in terminating Sh. Naresh Kumar S/o Sh. Shiv Balak Singh from the
service w.e.f 01.05.2011 is just fair & legal? if not, to what relief the workman
concerned is entitled to?’
The averments of claimant workman may be summarized as follows:-
The applicant workman Sri Naresh Kumar was employed by the opposite party as an attendant on clear
vacancy in the year 1999 and he has worked in the said office till 30th April 2011. During the employment with
the opposite party the work and conduct of the applicant workman has always been found satisfactory and that
is the reason the applicant workman had never been served any censure or memo of charges by the opposite
party.The services of the concerned employee had been terminated w.e.f 02.05.2011 by the Board of
Apprenticeship Training (BOAT) without assigning any reason and without compliance of the provisions of
section 25F of Industrial Dispute Act 1947. The concerned workman has rendered 14 years of uninterrupted
service in the office of the opposite party.It is averred that during the employment with the opposite party, the
concerned workman was being paid meagre amount below the minimum wages as notified by the government
2620 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
from time to time under the Minimum Wages Act 1948. The said act of the opposite party was quite unfair and
against the state policy.
It is relevant to state that besides the routine work of the office, the concerned workman was also
engaged on overtime work on regular basis by the opposite party. Since the plaintiff workman was being paid
inadequate wages below the minimum wages during the employment, he requested to the Director of the BOAT
to increase his wages up to the level of minimum wage, the Director removed the workman from the services
from 01.05.2011 maliciously without following the procedure laid down in the Industrial Dispute Act 1947. It is
noteworthy that another workman junior to the concerned workman was made permanent. This action of the
BOAT is absolutely discriminatory and in violation of article 14 of Constitution of India. The pick and choose
policy in Government sector is not permissible. The entire action of the opposite party is malicious,
discriminatory and against the policies of the government and as such not sustainable. The exploitation and
victimization of the concerned workman is not only condemnable but also punishable under existing laws.
Keeping in view the above facts, the termination of the concerned workman of Sri Naresh Kumar from the
service of the BOAT w.e.f 01.05.2011 is illegal and unjustified and therefore liable to set aside.
No written statement has been submitted by O.P employer though notices were duly issued.
For adjudication of the Industrial Dispute following points are to be answered:-
1. Whether the termination of claimant workman Shri Naresh Kumar w.e.f 01.04.2011 suffers from any
legal perversity?
2. To what relief the claimant is entitled?
Point No. 1
For the sake of clarity it is stated that no written statement against the statement of claim filed by
claimant workman on 29.10.2018 has been filed on behalf of O.P management. In such scenario the
adjudication for Industrial dispute is made on the basis of averments found in statement of claim and documents
filed on behalf of claimant workman. Though the pleadings of claimant workman in statement of claim cannot
be strictly read as substantive evidence on behalf of workman a good number of photocopies of documents such
as Identity card and payment vouchers, one paper containing noting of one authority of employer institution
made on date 31.07.2009 have been filed. These documents have remained uncontroverted and from the said
uncontroverted documents it can safely concluded that Naresh Kuamr was engaged as casual worker in the post
of project attendant on daily wage of Rs 100/-. In view of the evidence adduced by Naresh Kumar it is crystal
clear that he was engaged as daily wager though he might have served for long period. Law is well settled that a
daily wager engaged as casual worker cannot acquire any right to be absorbed in any substantive post without
undergoing regular process of selection. The termination of engagement of Shri Naresh Kumar as previously
engaged as Casual project attendant by the employer cannot be held to be illegal in view of the spirit of case law
Himanshu Kumar Vidyarthi versus State of Bihar & others termination of Shri Naresh Kumar by employer
cannot be held as illegal. To add to this it is not clear if the project in which Naresh Kumar was engaged had
continued after his disengagement . The disengagement of Shri Naresh Kumar from the post of project attendant
cannot be read as retrenchment as enshrined in 2[00] of Industrial Disputes Act 1947. Since the termination of
Naresh Kumar is not retrenchment the provisions of section 25F of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 are not
applicable on disengagement of Naresh Kumar.The claimant might have been paid wages below the minimum
wages as notified by the government but there is no supportive documentary material. Such stand of Naresh
Kumar that he was paid below minimum wages remains a doubtful plea. Even if he was not given minimum
wages he cannot be automatically absorbed in any permanent vacancy. In view of discussions stated above it
can be concluded that termination of Naresh Kumar w.e.f 01.04.2011 cannot be held as illegal.
Point No.2
To what relief the claimant is entitled?
From uncontroverted averment and documents Naresh Kumar was engaged as casual worker from
1999 upto 01.05.2011. In view of long period of engagement and view of spirit of Sahani as pronounced by
Supreme Court Naresh Kumar is entitled to get compensation which can be worked out on guess work. It is
clear that Naresh Kumar had accepted the engagement as casual worker on daily wages for Rs 100/- per day.
Though he is not entitled to get retrenchment compensation and notice pay his compensation can be worked out
as pay for 15 days of wages for every completed year since 1999 till 01.05.2011 which comes to wages for 6
months and notice pay for 1 month intoto for 7 months of monthly wages which comes to 3600X7= 25200. On
the said amount the claimant workman is entitled to get simple interest of 9% per annum from 01.05.2011 upto
date of actual payment which shall be deposited into the account of the claimant Naresh Kumar within one
month of publication of the award under section 17 of ID Act, 1947.
Date: 23.09.2022 SOMA SHEKHAR JENA, Presiding Officer
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2621
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1238.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अन सरण में,
केन्रीय सरकार कमाधिेंट एवध प्रबंधि धनिेशक, 509, आमी बंेस वकयशॉप,आगरा (यू.पी) के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध
जनयोिकों और सधिव, 509 ईएमई वकयसय यूधनयन, आगरा (यूपी), के बीच अन बंि में जनर्िाष्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार
vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] कानपुर के ृंचाट (संिभा सं. 67 of 2014) को जैसा दक अनुलग्नक में
दििाया गया है, प्रकाजित करती िज जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 09.11.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल- 14011/05/2014- आईआर(डीयू)]
िी.के. धहमाधशु, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1238.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 67 of 2014) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal
cum Labour Court–Kanpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to The Commandant & Managing Director,509, Army Base Workshop, Agra (U.P) and The Secretary,
509 EME Workers Union, Agra (U.P),which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central
Government on 09.11.2022.
[No. L- 14011/05/2014-IR(DU)]
D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI SOMA SHEKHAR JENA, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL–CUM-LABOUR COURT KANPUR
Present: SOMA SHEKHAR JENA Hjs (Retd.)
I.D. No. 67 of 2014
L-14011/05/2014-IR(DU) dated 27.05.2014
BETWEEN
The Secretary,
509 EME Workers Union, 16/107,
Laldi Katra,Shahganj,
AGRA (U.P)-
AND
The Commandant & Managing Director,
509, Army Base Workshop,
AGRA (U.P)-
AWARD
This award arises in respect of the reference mentioned in the schedule stated below as received from
the Government of India in letter no. L-14011/05/2014-IR(DU) dated 27.05.2014.
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of 509 ABW, Agra in fixing the pay of Shri Rajesh
Kumar Sharma, TCM T No. 6763 w.e.f 1st September 2002 instead of 1st march, 2002 (on
being granting of 1st ACP) is just and Proper? and if not, what relief the concerned workman is
entitled to?”
On receipt of notification,notices were issued to both the parties on 13th August, 2014
In response to the notice the AR of the claimant workman filed the claim statement on 13.03.2015.Later on
13.04.2015 AR of the management filed written statement. On 19.06.2015 AR of the claimant workman filed
rejoinder. On 20.11.2015 AR of claimant workman filed documents and on 14.03.2016 AR of the management
filed documents. Since then several opportunities were provided to the claimants workmen but claimant
workmen failed to register their presence before this Tribunal. The proceeding was fixed to dates 24.05.2016,
2622 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
27.06.2016, 12.08.2016, 30.09.2016, 25.11.2016, 06.02.2017, 10.04.2017, 30.05.2017, 07.08.2017, 31.10.2017,
18.01.2018, 04.04.2018, 30.05.2018, 06.08.2018, 11.10.2018, 14.12.2018, 28.02.2019, 03.05.2019, 17.07.2019,
26.09.2019, 6.12.2019, 12.02.2020, 28.04.2020, 10.07.2020, 02.09.2020, 03.12.2020, 28.12.2020, 29.01.2020,
13.04.2021, 13.07.2021, 16.09.2021, 11.11.2021, 06.01.2022, 24.03.2022 but claimant workman failed to
appear before the Tribunal. Pleadings in the claim application and in the rejoinder are not to be read as
evidence. After all, the Management is vested with authority to allow ACP with effect from a deferred date.
From the aforesaid circumstances it is presumable that the workman and the union are not interested in
prosecuting the case further before the Tribunal.
Hence in the given circumstances the reference stands disposed of as of ‘NIL’ award.
Parties are left to bear their respective costs.
SOMA SHEKHAR JENA, Presiding officer
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1239.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अन सरण में,
केन्रीय सरकार महाप्रबंधिक (ओ एधि एम) एनटीपीसी, धबंलासपुर (सी.जी.); अपर प्रबंधिक और मानव सधसािन
(प्रमुि), मैससय एरा इधफ्रा इधजीधनयररधग धलधमटेि, नोएिा (यू.पी); पररयोजना प्रबंधिक, एरा इधफ्रा इधजीधनयररधग
धलधमटेि एनटीपीसी, धबंलासपुर (सी.जी) के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और अध्यक्ष, छत्तीसगढ़ कमयिारी मजिूर
एकता सधघ, धबंलासपुर, छत्तीसगढ़,के बीच अन बंि में जनर्िाष्ट केन्रीय सरकार vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je
U;k;ky;] जबंलपुर के ृंचाट (संिभा सं. CGIT/LC/R/145/2017) को जैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दििाया गया है,
प्रकाजित करती िज जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 30/10/2022 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल- 42011/112/2017- आईआर-(िीयू)]
िी.के. धहमाधशु, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1239.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/LC/R/145/2017) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal cum Labour–Jabalpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to The General Manager (O & M) NTPC, Bilaspur (C.G.);The Additional Manager & HR (Head), M/s
Era Infra Engineering Ltd., Noida (U.P);The Project Manager, Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC, Bilaspur
(C.G) and The President, Chhattisgarh Employees Mazdoor Ekta Sangh, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, which was
received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 30/10/2022.
[No. L- 42011/112/2017- IR (DU)]
D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/145/2017
Present: P.K.SRIVASTAVA H.J.S..( RETD)
Shri Om Prakash Gangotri
President,
Chhattisgarh Kramchari Mazdoor Ekta Union,
Bilaspur(C.G.)-495006
….Workman
Versus
The Project Manager
Era Infra Engineering Ltd.
NTPC, Seepat,PO-Ujjwal Nagar,
District Bilaspur(CG-495006)
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2623
The Additional Manager & HR(Head)
M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd.
C-56/41.Sector62, Noida(UP)-201301.
The General Manager(O&M)
NTPC Seepat, PO-Ujjwal Nagar,
Bilaspur(C.G.)495006
….Management
AWARD
(Passed on this 10th day of October-2022.)
As per letter dated 24/10/2017 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the
reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per
Notification No.L-42011/112/2017-IR(DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action of the management on the pat of M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd. A
contractor working under the Principal Employer at NTPC, Seepat site in terminating the
workman namely Shri Anurag S/o shri Santoshand not paying the terminal benefits as
espoused by the President of Chhattisgarh Karamchari Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur is legal
and justified without complying the provisions of Section 25(f) of the ID Act? If Not, what relief
the above named workman is entitled to? .”
1. After registering the case on the basis of reference, notices were sent to the parties. Parties were
served. They appeared through their learned counsel.
2. The workman did not file any statement of claim. Management also preferred not to file any written
statement of defence.
3. The reference is the issue for determination in the case in hand.
4. The initial burden to prove the claim is on the workman in which he has miserably failed, hence
holding the claim of the workman not proved the reference is answered against the workman.
5. On the basis of the above discussion, following award is passed:-
A.The action of the management as mentioned in the reference is held to be just and proper.
B.The workman is held entitled to no relief.
6. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as
per rules.
P.K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
DATE: 10-10-2022
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1240.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अन सरण में,
केन्रीय सरकार महाप्रबंधिक (ओ एधि एम) एनटीपीसी, धबंलासपुर (सी.जी.); अपर प्रबंधिक और मानव सधसािन
(प्रमुि), मैससय एरा इधफ्रा इधजीधनयररधग धलधमटेि, नोएिा (यू.पी); पररयोजना प्रबंधिक, एरा इधफ्रा इधजीधनयररधग
धलधमटेि एनटीपीसी, धबंलासपुर (सी.जी) के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और अध्यक्ष, छत्तीसगढ़ कमयिारी मजिूर
एकता सधघ, धबंलासपुर, छत्तीसगढ़,के बीच अन बंि में जनर्िाष्ट केन्रीय सरकार vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je
U;k;ky;] जबंलपुर के ृंचाट (संिभा सं. CGIT/LC/R/144/2017) को जैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दििाया गया है,
प्रकाजित करती िज जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 30/10/2022 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल- 42011/111/2017- आईआर-(डीयू)]
िी.के. धहमाधशु, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1240.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/LC/R/144/2017) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal cum Labour–Jabalpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to The General Manager (O & M) NTPC, Bilaspur (C.G.);The Additional Manager & HR (Head),
2624 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd., Noida (U.P);The Project Manager, Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC, Bilaspur
(C.G) and The President, Chhattisgarh Employees Mazdoor Ekta Sangh, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, which was
received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 30/10/2022.
[No. L- 42011/111/2017- IR (DU)]
D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM -LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/144/2017
Present: P.K.SRIVASTAVA H.J.S..( RETD)
Shri Om Prakash Gangotri
President, Chhattisgarh Kramchari Mazdoor Ekta Union,
Bilaspur(C.G.)-495006
…Workman
Versus
The Project Manager
Era Infra Engineering Ltd.
NTPC, Seepat,PO-Ujjwal Nagar,
District Bilaspur(CG-495006)
The Additional Manager & HR(Head)
M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd.
C-56/41.Sector62, Noida(UP)-201301.
The General Manager(O&M)
NTPC Seepat, PO-Ujjwal Nagar,
Bilaspur(C.G.)495006
…Management
AWARD
(Passed on this 10th day of October-2022.)
As per letter dated 24/10/2017 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the
reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per
Notification No.L-42011/111/2017-IR(DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action of the management on the pat of M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd. A contractor
working under the Principal Employer at NTPC, Seepat site in terminating the workman namely
shri Chaturlal S/o Ramadhin and not paying the terminal benefits as espoused by the President of
Chhattisgarh Karamchari Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur is legal and justified without complying
the provisions of Section 25(f) of the ID Act? If Not, what relief the above named workman is
entitled to? .”
1.
After registering the case on the basis of reference, notices were sent to the parties. Parties were
served. They appeared through their learned counsel.
2.
The workman did not file any statement of claim. Management also preferred not to file any written
statement of defence.
3.
The reference is the issue for determination in the case in hand.
4.
The initial burden to prove the claim is on the workman in which he has miserably failed, hence
holding the claim of the workman not proved the reference is answered against the workman.
5.
On the basis of the above discussion, following award is passed:-
A. The action of the management as mentioned in the reference is held to be just and
proper.
B. The workman is held entitled to no relief.
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2625
6. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per
rules.
DATE: 10-10-2022
P.K.SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1241.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अन सरण में,
केन्रीय सरकार महाप्रबंधिक (ओ एधि एम) एनटीपीसी, धबंलासपुर (सी.जी.); अपर प्रबंधिक और मानव सधसािन
(प्रमुि), मैससय एरा इधफ्रा इधजीधनयररधग धलधमटेि, नोएिा (यू.पी); पररयोजना प्रबंधिक, एरा इधफ्रा इधजीधनयररधग
धलधमटेि एनटीपीसी, धबंलासपुर (सी.जी) के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और अध्यक्ष, छत्तीसगढ़ कमयिारी मजिूर
एकता सधघ, धबंलासपुर, छत्तीसगढ़,के बीच अन बंि में जनर्िाष्ट केन्रीय सरकार vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je
U;k;ky;] जबंलपुर ृंचाट (संिभा सं्या CGIT/LC/R/143/2017) को जैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दििाया गया है,
प्रकाजित करती िज जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 30/10/2022 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल- 42011/108/2017- आईआर-(िीयू)]
िी.के. धहमाधशु, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1241.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/LC/R/143/2017) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal cum Labour–Jabalpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to The General Manager (O & M) NTPC, Bilaspur (C.G.);The Additional Manager & HR (Head),
M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd., Noida (U.P);The Project Manager, Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC, Bilaspur
(C.G) and The President, Chhattisgarh Employees Mazdoor Ekta Sangh, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, which was
received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 30/10/2022.
[F. No. L- 42011/108/2017- IR (DU)]
D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/143/2017
Present: P.K.Srivastava H.J.S..( Retd)
Shri Om Prakash Gangotri
President,
Chhattisgarh Kramchari Mazdoor Ekta Union,
Bilaspur(C.G.)-495006
…Workman
Versus
The Project Manager
Era Infra Engineering Ltd.
NTPC, Seepat,PO-Ujjwal Nagar,
District Bilaspur(CG-495006)
The Additional Manager & HR(Head)
M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd.
C-56/41.Sector62, Noida(UP)-201301.
The General Manager(O&M)
NTPC Seepat, PO-Ujjwal Nagar,
Bilaspur(C.G.)495006
…Management
2626 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AWARD
(Passed on this 10th day of October 2022.)
As per letter dated 24-10-2017 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the
reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per
Notification No.L-42011/108/2017-IR(DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action of the management on the pat of M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd.
A contractor working under the Principal Employer at NTPC, Seepat site in terminating
the workman namely Amrit Lal S/o Shri Bisahu and not paying the terminal benefits as
espoused by the President of Chhattisgarh Karamchari Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur is
legal and justified without complying the provisions of Section 25(f) of the ID Act? If Not,
what relief the above named workman is entitled to? .”
1.
After registering the case on the basis of reference, notices were sent to the parties. Parties were
served. They appeared through their learned counsel.
2.
The workman did not file any statement of claim. Management also preferred not to file any written
statement of defence.
3.
The reference is the issue for determination in the case in hand.
4.
The initial burden to prove the claim is on the workman in which he has miserably failed, hence
holding the claim of the workman not proved the reference is answered against the workman.
5.
On the basis of the above discussion, following award is passed:-
A.The action of the management as mentioned in the reference is held to be just and proper.
B.The workman is held entitled to no relief.
6. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per
rules.
P.K.SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
DATE: 10-10-2022
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1242.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अन सरण में,
केन्रीय सरकार महाप्रबंधिक (ओ एधि एम) एनटीपीसी, धबंलासपुर (सी.जी.); अपर प्रबंधिक और मानव सधसािन
(प्रमुि), मैससय एरा इधफ्रा इधजीधनयररधग धलधमटेि, नोएिा (यू.पी); पररयोजना प्रबंधिक, एरा इधफ्रा इधजीधनयररधग
धलधमटेि एनटीपीसी, धबंलासपुर (सी.जी) के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और अध्यक्ष, छत्तीसगढ़ कमयिारी मजिूर
एकता सधघ, धबंलासपुर, छत्तीसगढ़, के बीच अन बंि में जनर्िाष्ट केन्रीय सरकार vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je
U;k;ky;] जबंलपुर ृंचाट (संिभा सं. CGIT/LC/R/142/2017) को जैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दििाया गया है,
प्रकाजित करती िज जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 30/10/2022 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल- 42011/110/2017- आईआर-(िीयू)]
िी.के. धहमाधशु ,अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1242.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/LC/R/142/2017) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal cum Labour–Jabalpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to The General Manager (O & M) NTPC, Bilaspur (C.G.);The Additional Manager & HR (Head), M/s
Era Infra Engineering Ltd., Noida (U.P);The Project Manager, Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC, Bilaspur
(C.G) and The President, Chhattisgarh Employees Mazdoor Ekta Sangh, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, which was
received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 30/10/2022.
[No. L- 42011/110/2017- IR (DU)]
D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2627
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/142/2017
Present: P.K.Srivastava H.J.S..( Retd)
Shri Om Prakash Gangotri
President,
Chhattisgarh Kramchari Mazdoor Ekta Union,
Bilaspur(C.G.)-495006
…Workman
Versus
The Project Manager
Era Infra Engineering Ltd.
NTPC, Seepat,PO-Ujjwal Nagar,
District Bilaspur(CG-495006)
The Additional Manager & HR(Head)
M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd.
C-56/41.Sector62, Noida(UP)-201301.
The General Manager(O&M)
NTPC Seepat, PO-Ujjwal Nagar,
Bilaspur(C.G.)495006
…Management
AWARD
(Passed on this 10th day of October-2022.)
As per letter dated 24/10/2017 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the
reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per
Notification No.L-42011/110/2017-IR(DU) The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action of the management on the pat of M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd.
A contractor working under the Principal Employer at NTPC, Seepat site in terminating the
workman namely Shri Antardesi S/o Shri Mahettar and not paying the terminal benefits as
espoused by the President of Chhattisgarh Karamchari Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur is
legal and justified without complying the provisions of Section 25(f) of the ID Act? If Not,
what relief the above named workman is entitled to? .”
1.
After registering the case on the basis of reference, notices were sent to the parties. Parties were
served. They appeared through their learned counsel.
2.
The workman did not file any statement of claim. Management also preferred not to file any written
statement of defence.
3.
The reference is the issue for determination in the case in hand.
4.
The initial burden to prove the claim is on the workman in which he has miserably failed, hence
holding the claim of the workman not proved the reference is answered against the workman.
5.
On the basis of the above discussion, following award is passed:-
A.The action of the management as mentioned in the reference is held to be just and proper.
B.The workman is held entitled to no relief.
6. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per
rules.
P.K.SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
DATE: 10-10-2022
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1243.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अन सरण में,
केन्रीय सरकार महाप्रबंधिक (ओ एधि एम) एनटीपीसी, धबंलासपुर (सी.जी.); अपर प्रबंधिक और मानव सधसािन
2628 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(प्रमुि), मैससय एरा इधफ्रा इधजीधनयररधग धलधमटेि, नोएिा (यू.पी); पररयोजना प्रबंधिक, एरा इधफ्रा इधजीधनयररधग
धलधमटेि एनटीपीसी, धबंलासपुर (सी.जी) के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्रीमती सुनीता बंाई ,द्वारा अध्यक्ष,
छत्तीसगढ़ कमयिारी मजिूर एकता सधघ, धबंलासपुर, छत्तीसगढ़,के बीच अन बंि में जनर्िाष्ट केन्रीय सरकार vkS|ksfxd
vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] जबंलपुर के ृंचाट (संिभा सं. CGIT/LC/R/47/2017) को जैसा दक अनुलग्नक में
दििाया गया है, प्रकाजित करती िज जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 30/10/2022 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल- 42011/04/2017- आईआर-(िीयू)]
िी.के. धहमाधशु, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1243.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/LC/R/47/2017) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal cum Labour–Jabalpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to The General Manager (O & M) NTPC, Bilaspur (C.G.);The Additional Manager & HR (Head), M/s
Era Infra Engineering Ltd., Noida (U.P);The Project Manager, Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC, Bilaspur
(C.G) and Smt. Sunita Bai, Through The President, Chhattisgarh Employees Mazdoor Ekta Sangh, Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 30/10/2022.
[No. L- 42011/04/2017- IR (DU)]
D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/47/2017
Present: P.K.Srivastava H.J.S.(Retd.)
Smt. Sunita Bai,
C/o Shri Om Prakash Gangotri,
President, Chhattisgarh Kramchari
Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh – 495555.
….Workman
Versus
The General Manager (O & M)
NTPC, Seepat PO Ujjawal Nagar,
Bilaspur. C.G. - 495555
The Addl. Manager & HR (Head)
M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd.
C-56/41, Sector – 62,
Noida UP – 201301.
The Project Manager,
Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC,
Seepat Site, P.O. Ujjawal Nagar
Bilaspur. C.G. – 495555.
….Management
AWARD
(Passed on this 17th day of October-2022)
2.
As per letter dated 09/05/2017 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the
reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per
Notification No. L-42011/04/2017 – IR (DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action on the part of M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd, a contractor
working under the principal employer at NTPC, Seepat site in terminating the workman
namely Smt. Sunita Bai w/o Ratiram and not paying the terminal benefits as espoused
by the president of the Chattisgarh Kramchari Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur is legal
and justified as per the provisions of section 25 (F) of ID act? If not, what relief the
above named workman is entitled to?
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2629
3. After registering the case on the basis of reference, notices were sent to the parties on addresses’
mention in the reference. Workman represented through her learned counsel Adv. Shri S.K.Saini. Management
No. 1 & 2 represented through their learned counsel Adv. Shri R.C.Shrivastava and Adv. Shri Pradeep Kumar
Pandey respectively. Many dates were given for filling of Statement of Claim. No Statement of Claim was
filed. The opposite parties also did not file any Written Statement of Defence.
4. Since the initial burden to prove its case is on the workman side in which she has failed. Hence the
reference deserves to be answered against her and is answered accordingly.
5. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as
per rules.
P.K.SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
DATE: 17-10-2022
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1244.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अन सरण में,
केन्रीय सरकार मिाप्रबंिक (ओ एंड एम) एनटीृीसी, जबलासृ र (सी.िी.); अृर प्रबंिक और मानव संसािन
(प्रम ), मजससा एरा इंफ्रा इंिीजनयररंग जलजमटेड, नोएडा (यू.ृी); ृट्ररयोिना प्रबंिक, एरा इंफ्रा इंिीजनयररंग
जलजमटेड एनटीृीसी, जबलासृ र (सी.िी) के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्रीमती रतन रानी,द्वारा अध्यक्ष,
छत्तीसगढ़ कमाचारी मििूर एकता संघ, जबलासृ र, छत्तीसगढ़,के बीच अन बंि में जनर्िाष्ट केन्रीय सरकार vkS|ksfxd
vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] िबलृ र के ृंचाट (संिभा सं. CGIT/LC/R/48/2017) को िजसा दक अन लग्नक में
दि ाया गया िज, प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्रीय सरकार को सकफ्ट ककृी के सा 30/10/2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ाl
[सं. एल- 42011/06/2017- आईआर-(िीयू)]
िी.के. धहमाधशु, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1244.— In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/LC/R/48/2017) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal cum Labour–Jabalpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to The General Manager (O & M) NTPC, Bilaspur (C.G.);The Additional Manager & HR (Head), M/s
Era Infra Engineering Ltd., Noida (U.P);The Project Manager, Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC, Bilaspur
(C.G) and Smt Ratan Rani, Through The President, Chhattisgarh Employees Mazdoor Ekta Sangh, Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 30/10/2022.
[No. L- 42011/06/2017- IR (DU)]
D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/48/2017
Present: P.K.Srivastava H.J.S.(Retd.)
Smt. Ratan Rani,
C/o Shri Om Prakash Gangotri,
President, Chhattisgarh Kramchari
Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh – 495555.
….Workman
Versus
The General Manager (O & M)
NTPC, Seepat PO Ujjawal Nagar,
Bilaspur. C.G. - 495555
The Addl. Manager & HR (Head)
2630 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd.
C-56/41, Sector – 62,
Noida UP – 201301.
The Project Manager,
Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC,
Seepat Site, P.O. Ujjawal Nagar
Bilaspur. C.G. – 495555
…Management
AWARD
(Passed on this 17th day of October-2022)
1.
As per letter dated 09/05/2017 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the
reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per
Notification No. L-42011/06/2017 – IR (DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action on the part of M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd, a contractor
working under the principal employer at NTPC, Seepat site in terminating the workman
namely Smt. Ratan Rani w/o Patiram and not paying the terminal benefits as espoused
by the president of the Chattisgarh Kramchari Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur is legal
and justified as per the provisions of section 25 (F) of ID act? If not, what relief the
above named workman is entitled to?
2.
After registering the case on the basis of reference, notices were sent to the parties on addresses’
mention in the reference. Workman represented through her learned counsel Adv. Shri S.K.Saini. Management
No. 1 & 2 represented through their learned counsel Adv. Shri R.C.Shrivastava and Adv. Shri Pradeep Kumar
Pandey respectively. Many dates were given for filling of Statement of Claim. No Statement of Claim was
filed. The opposite parties also did not file any Written Statement of Defence.
3.
Since the initial burden to prove its case is on the workman side in which she has failed. Hence the
reference deserves to be answered against her and is answered accordingly.
4.
Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as
per rules.
P.K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
DATE: 17-10-2022
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1245.— औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अन सरण में,
केन्रीय सरकार मिाप्रबंिक (ओ एंड एम) एनटीृीसी, जबलासृ र (सी.िी.); अृर प्रबंिक और मानव संसािन
(प्रम ), मजससा एरा इंफ्रा इंिीजनयररंग जलजमटेड, नोएडा (यू.ृी); ृट्ररयोिना प्रबंिक, एरा इंफ्रा इंिीजनयररंग
जलजमटेड एनटीृीसी, जबलासृ र (सी.िी) के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री म रली प्रसाि, द्वारा अध्यक्ष,
छत्तीसगढ़ कमाचारी मििूर एकता संघ, जबलासृ र, छत्तीसगढ़,के बीच अन बंि में जनर्िाष्ट केन्रीय सरकार vkS|ksfxd
vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] िबलृ र ृंचाट (संिभा सं्या CGIT/LC/R/49/2017) को िजसा दक अन लग्नक में
दि ाया गया िज, प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्रीय सरकार को सकफ्ट ककृी के सा 30/10/2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा
[सं. एल- 42011/07/2017- आईआर-(िीयू)]
िी.के. धहमाधशु, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1245.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/LC/R/49/2017) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal cum Labour–Jabalpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to The General Manager (O & M) NTPC, Bilaspur (C.G.); The Additional Manager & HR (Head), M/s
Era Infra Engineering Ltd., Noida (U.P); The Project Manager, Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC, Bilaspur
(C.G) and Shri Murli Prasad, Through The President, Chhattisgarh Employees Mazdoor Ekta Sangh, Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 30/10/2022.
[No. L- 42011/07/2017- IR (DU)]
D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2631
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/49/2017
Present: P.K.Srivastava H.J.S.(Retd.)
Shri Murli Prasad,
S/o Kashi Ram,
C/o Shri Om Prakash Gangotri,
President, Chhattisgarh Kramchari
Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh - 495555
….Workman
Versus
The General Manager (O & M)
NTPC, Seepat PO Ujjawal Nagar,
Bilaspur C.G. - 495555
The Addl. Manager & HR (Head)
M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd.
C-56/41, Sector – 62,
Noida UP – 201301.
The Project Manager,
Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC,
Seepat Site, P.O. Ujjawal Nagar
Bilaspur. C.G. – 495555.
…Management
AWARD
(Passed on this 17th day of October-2022)
1. As per letter dated 09/05/2017 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the
reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per
Notification No. L-42011/07/2017 – IR (DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action on the part of M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd, a contractor
working under the principal employer at NTPC, Seepat site in terminating the workman
namely Shri Murli Prasad S/o Kashi Ram and not paying the terminal benefits as
espoused by the president of the Chattisgarh Kramchari Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur
is legal and justified as per the provisions of section 25 (F) of ID act? If not, what relief
the above named workman is entitled to?
2. After registering the case on the basis of reference, notices were sent to the parties on addresses’
mention in the reference. Workman represented through her learned counsel Adv. Shri S.K.Saini. Management
No. 1 & 2 represented through their learned counsel Adv. Shri R.C.Shrivastava and Adv. Shri Pradeep Kumar
Pandey respectively. Many dates were given for filling of Statement of Claim. No Statement of Claim was
filed. The opposite parties also did not file any Written Statement of Defence.
3. Since the initial burden to prove its case is on the workman side in which he has failed. Hence the
reference deserves to be answered against him and is answered accordingly.
4. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as
per rules.
P.K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
DATE: 17-10-2022
2632 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1246.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अन सरण में,
केन्रीय सरकार मिाप्रबंिक (ओ एंड एम) एनटीृीसी, जबलासृ र (सी.िी.); अृर प्रबंिक और मानव संसािन
(प्रम ), मजससा एरा इंफ्रा इंिीजनयररंग जलजमटेड, नोएडा (यू.ृी); ृट्ररयोिना प्रबंिक, एरा इंफ्रा इंिीजनयररंग
जलजमटेड एनटीृीसी, जबलासृ र (सी.िी) के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्रीमती ृरमेश्वरी बाई राम, द्वारा
अध्यक्ष, छत्तीसगढ़ कमाचारी मििूर एकता संघ, जबलासृ र, छत्तीसगढ़,के बीच अन बंि में जनर्िाष्ट केन्रीय सरकार
vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] िबलृ र के ृंचाट (संिभा सं. CGIT/LC/R/50/2017) को िजसा दक
अन लग्नक में दि ाया गया िज, प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्रीय सरकार को सकफ्ट ककृी के सा 30/10/2022 को प्राप्त
हुआ ा ।
[सं. एल- 42011/08/2017- आईआर-(िीयू)]
िी.के. धहमाधशु, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1246.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/LC/R/50/2017) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal cum Labour–Jabalpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to The General Manager (O & M) NTPC, Bilaspur (C.G.);The Additional Manager & HR (Head), M/s
Era Infra Engineering Ltd., Noida (U.P);The Project Manager, Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC, Bilaspur
(C.G) and Smt. Parmeshwari Bai Ram, Through The President, Chhattisgarh Employees Mazdoor Ekta Sangh,
Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on
30/10/2022.
[No. L- 42011/08/2017- IR (DU)]
D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/50/2017
Present: P.K.Srivastava H.J.S.(Retd.)
Smt. Parmeshwari Bai Ram,
C/o Shri Om Prakash Gangotri,
President, Chhattisgarh Kramchari
Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh – 495555.
…..Workman
Versus
The General Manager (O & M)
NTPC, Seepat PO Ujjawal Nagar,
Bilaspur. C.G. - 495555
The Addl. Manager & HR (Head)
M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd.
C-56/41, Sector – 62,
Noida UP – 201301.
The Project Manager,
Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC,
Seepat Site, P.O. Ujjawal Nagar
Bilaspur. C.G. – 495555
….Management
AWARD
(Passed on this 17th day of October-2022)
1.
As per letter dated 09/05/2017 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the
reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per
Notification No. L-42011/08/2017 – IR (DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2633
“Whether the action on the part of M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd, a contractor working
under the principal employer at NTPC, Seepat site in terminating the workman namely
Smt. Parmeshwari Bai Ram W/o Shri Madhu Ram and not paying the terminal benefits as
espoused by the president of the Chattisgarh Kramchari Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur is
legal and justified as per the provisions of section 25 (F) of ID act? If not, what relief the
above named workman is entitled to?
2.
After registering the case on the basis of reference, notices were sent to the parties on addresses’
mention in the reference. Workman represented through her learned counsel Adv. Shri S.K. Saini. Management
No. 1 & 2 represented through their learned counsel Adv. Shri R.C. Shrivastava and Adv. Shri Pradeep Kumar
Pandey respectively. Many dates were given for filling of Statement of Claim. No Statement of Claim was
filed. The opposite parties also did not file any Written Statement of Defence.
3.
Since the initial burden to prove its case is on the workman side in which she has failed. Hence the
reference deserves to be answered against her and is answered accordingly.
4.
Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as
per rules.
P.K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
DATE: 17-10-2022
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1247.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अन सरण में, केन्रीय
सरकार मिाप्रबंिक (ओ एंड एम) एनटीृीसी, जबलासृ र (सी.िी.); अृर प्रबंिक और मानव संसािन (प्रम ),
मजससा एरा इंफ्रा इंिीजनयररंग जलजमटेड, नोएडा (यू.ृी); ृट्ररयोिना प्रबंिक, एरा इंफ्रा इंिीजनयररंग जलजमटेड
एनटीृीसी, जबलासृ र (सी.िी) के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री श्रीजनवास चत वेिी, द्वारा अध्यक्ष,
छत्तीसगढ़ कमाचारी मििूर एकता संघ, जबलासृ र, छत्तीसगढ़, के बीच अन बंि में जनर्िाष्ट केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक
अजिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, िबलृ र के ृंचाट (संिभा सं. CGIT/LC/R/51/2017) को िजसा दक अन लग्नक में
दि ाया गया िज, प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्रीय सरकार को सकफ्ट ककृी के सा 30/10/2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा ।
[सं. एल- 42011/09/2017-आईआर-(डीयू)]
िी.के. धहमाधशु, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1247.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/LC/R/51/2017) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal cum Labour–Jabalpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to The General Manager (O & M) NTPC, Bilaspur (C.G.);The Additional Manager & HR (Head), M/s
Era Infra Engineering Ltd., Noida (U.P);The Project Manager, Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC, Bilaspur
(C.G) and Shri Shrinivas Chaturvedi, Through The President, Chhattisgarh Employees Mazdoor Ekta Sangh,
Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on
30/10/2022.
[No. L- 42011/09/2017 - IR (DU)]
D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM -LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/51/2017
Present: P.K.Srivastava H.J.S.(Retd.)
Shri Shrinivas Chaturvedi,
C/o Shri Om Prakash Gangotri,
President, Chhattisgarh Kramchari
Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh – 495555
…Workman
2634 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Versus
The General Manager (O & M)
NTPC, Seepat PO Ujjawal Nagar,
Bilaspur. C.G. - 495555
The Addl. Manager & HR (Head)
M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd.
C-56/41, Sector – 62,
Noida UP – 201301.
The Project Manager,
Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC,
Seepat Site, P.O. Ujjawal Nagar
Bilaspur. C.G. – 495555.
…Management
AWARD
(Passed on this 17th day of October-2022)
1.
As per letter dated 09/05/2017 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the
reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per
Notification No. L-42011/09/2017 – IR (DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action on the part of M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd, a contractor working
under the principal employer at NTPC, Seepat site in terminating the workman namely Shri
Shrinivas Chaturvedi S/o G.P Ghater and not paying the terminal benefits as espoused by
the president of the Chattisgarh Kramchari Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur is legal and
justified as per the provisions of section 25 (F) of ID act? If not, what relief the above named
workman is entitled to?
2.
After registering the case on the basis of reference, notices were sent to the parties on addresses’
mention in the reference. Workman represented through her learned counsel Adv. Shri S.K.Saini. Management
No. 1 & 2 represented through their learned counsel Adv. Shri R.C. Shrivastava and Adv. Shri Pradeep Kumar
Pandey respectively. Many dates were given for filling of Statement of Claim. No Statement of Claim was
filed. The opposite parties also did not file any Written Statement of Defence.
3.
Since the initial burden to prove its case is on the workman side in which he has failed. Hence the
reference deserves to be answered against him and is answered accordingly.
4.
Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as
per rules.
P.K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
DATE: 17-10-2022
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1248.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अन सरण में, केन्रीय
सरकार मिाप्रबंिक (ओ एंड एम) एनटीृीसी, जबलासृ र (सी.िी.); अृर प्रबंिक और मानव संसािन (प्रम ),
मजससा एरा इंफ्रा इंिीजनयररंग जलजमटेड, नोएडा (यू.ृी); ृट्ररयोिना प्रबंिक, एरा इंफ्रा इंिीजनयररंग जलजमटेड
एनटीृीसी, जबलासृ र (सी.िी) के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्रीमती स कवारा बाई, द्वारा अध्यक्ष,
छत्तीसगढ़ कमाचारी मििूर एकता संघ, जबलासृ र, छत्तीसगढ़,के बीच अन बंि में जनर्िाष्ट केन्रीय सरकार vkS|ksfxd
vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] िबलृ र के ृंचाट (संिभा सं. CGIT/LC/R/52/2017) को िजसा दक अन लग्नक में
दि ाया गया िज, प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्रीय सरकार को सकफ्ट ककृी के सा 30/10/2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l
[सं. एल- 42011/10/2017-आईआर-(डीयू)]
िी.के. धहमाधशु, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1248.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/LC/R/52/2017) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal cum Labour–Jabalpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to The General Manager (O & M) NTPC, Bilaspur (C.G.);The Additional Manager & HR (Head),
M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd., Noida (U.P);The Project Manager, Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC, Bilaspur
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2635
(C.G) and Smt. Sukwara Bai, Through The President, Chhattisgarh Employees Mazdoor Ekta Sangh, Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 30/10/2022.
[No. L- 42011/10/2017 - IR (DU)]
D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM -LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/52/2017
Present: P.K. Srivastava H.J.S.(Retd.)
Smt. Sukwara Bai,
C/o Shri Om Prakash Gangotri,
President, Chhattisgarh Kramchari
Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh – 495555.
…Workman
Versus
The General Manager (O & M)
NTPC, Seepat PO Ujjawal Nagar,
Bilaspur. C.G. - 495555
The Addl. Manager & HR (Head)
M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd.
C-56/41, Sector – 62,
Noida UP – 201301.
The Project Manager,
Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC,
Seepat Site, P.O. Ujjawal Nagar
Bilaspur. C.G. – 495555
…Management
AWARD
(Passed on this 17th day of October-2022)
1.
As per letter dated 09/05/2017 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the
reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per
Notification No. L-42011/10/2017 – IR (DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action on the part of M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd, a contractor
working under the principal employer at NTPC, Seepat site in terminating the
workman namely Smt. Sukwara Bai and not paying the terminal benefits as espoused
by the president of the Chattisgarh Kramchari Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur is legal
and justified as per the provisions of section 25 (F) of ID act? If not, what relief the
above named workman is entitled to?
2. After registering the case on the basis of reference, notices were sent to the parties on addresses’
mention in the reference. Workman represented through her learned counsel Adv. Shri S.K.Saini. Management
No. 1 & 2 represented through their learned counsel Adv. Shri R.C.Shrivastava and Adv. Shri Pradeep Kumar
Pandey respectively. Many dates were given for filling of Statement of Claim. No Statement of Claim was
filed. The opposite parties also did not file any Written Statement of Defence.
3. Since the initial burden to prove its case is on the workman side in which she has failed. Hence the
reference deserves to be answered against her and is answered accordingly.
4. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as
per rules.
P.K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
DATE: 17-10-2022
2636 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1249.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अन सरण में,
केन्रीय सरकार मिाप्रबंिक (ओ एंड एम) एनटीृीसी, जबलासृ र (सी.िी.); अृर प्रबंिक और मानव संसािन
(प्रम ), मजससा एरा इंफ्रा इंिीजनयररंग जलजमटेड, नोएडा (यू.ृी); ृट्ररयोिना प्रबंिक, एरा इंफ्रा इंिीजनयररंग
जलजमटेड एनटीृीसी, जबलासृ र (सी.िी) के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री जवनोि क मार, द्वारा अध्यक्ष,
छत्तीसगढ़ कमाचारी मििूर एकता संघ, जबलासृ र, छत्तीसगढ़, के बीच अन बंि में जनर्िाष्ट केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक
अजिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, िबलृ र के ृंचाट (संिभा सं. CGIT/LC/R/53/2017) को िजसा दक अन लग्नक में
दि ाया गया िज, प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्रीय सरकार को सकफ्ट ककृी के सा 30/10/2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा।
[सं. एल- 42011/17/2017-आईआर-(डीयू)]
िी.के. धहमाधशु, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1249.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/LC/R/53/2017) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal cum Labour–Jabalpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to The General Manager (O & M) NTPC, Bilaspur (C.G.); The Additional Manager & HR (Head), M/s
Era Infra Engineering Ltd., Noida (U.P);The Project Manager, Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC, Bilaspur
(C.G) and Shri Vinod Kumar, Through The President, Chhattisgarh Employees Mazdoor Ekta Sangh, Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 30/10/2022.
[No. L-42011/17/2017-IR (DU)]
D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM -LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/53/2017
Present: P.K. Srivastava H.J.S.(Retd.)
Shri Vinod Kumar,
C/o Shri Om Prakash Gangotri,
President, Chhattisgarh Kramchari
Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh – 495555.
….Workman
Versus
The General Manager (O & M)
NTPC, Seepat PO Ujjawal Nagar,
Bilaspur. C.G. - 495555
The Addl. Manager & HR (Head)
M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd.
C-56/41, Sector – 62,
Noida UP – 201301.
The Project Manager,
Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC,
Seepat Site, P.O. Ujjawal Nagar
Bilaspur. C.G. – 495555
…Management
AWARD
(Passed on this 17th day of October-2022)
1. As per letter dated 09/05/2017 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the
reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per
Notification No. L-42011/17/2017 – IR (DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2637
“Whether the action on the part of M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd, a contractor working
under the principal employer at NTPC, Seepat site in terminating the workman namely Shri
Vinod Kumar s/o Shri Bhagela and not paying the terminal benefits as espoused by the
president of the Chattisgarh Kramchari Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur is legal and justified
as per the provisions of section 25 (F) of ID act? If not, what relief the above named workman
is entitled to?
2.
After registering the case on the basis of reference, notices were sent to the parties on addresses’
mention in the reference. Workman represented through her learned counsel Adv. Shri S.K.Saini. Management
No. 1 & 2 represented through their learned counsel Adv. Shri R.C.Shrivastava and Adv. Shri Pradeep Kumar
Pandey respectively. Many dates were given for filling of Statement of Claim. No Statement of Claim was filed.
The opposite parties also did not file any Written Statement of Defence.
3.
Since the initial burden to prove its case is on the workman side in which he has failed. Hence the
reference deserves to be answered against him and is answered accordingly.
4.
Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as
per rules.
P.K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
DATE: 17-10-2022
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1250.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अन सरण में,
केन्रीय सरकार मिाप्रबंिक (ओ एंड एम) एनटीृीसी, जबलासृ र (सी.िी.); अृर प्रबंिक और मानव संसािन
(प्रम ), मजससा एरा इंफ्रा इंिीजनयररंग जलजमटेड, नोएडा (यू.ृी); ृट्ररयोिना प्रबंिक, एरा इंफ्रा इंिीजनयररंग
जलजमटेड एनटीृीसी, जबलासृ र (सी.िी) के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री मोिन, द्वारा अध्यक्ष, छत्तीसगढ़
कमाचारी मििूर एकता संघ, जबलासृ र, छत्तीसगढ़, के बीच अन बंि में जनर्िाष्ट केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण
एवं श्रम न्यायालय, िबलृ र के ृंचाट (संिभा सं. CGIT/LC/R/54/2017) को िजसा दक अन लग्नक में दि ाया गया
िज, प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्रीय सरकार को सकफ्ट ककृी के सा 30/10/2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा ।
[सं. एल- 42011/18/2017-आईआर-(डीयू)]
िी.के. धहमाधशु, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1250.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/LC/R/54/2017) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal cum Labour–Jabalpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to The General Manager (O & M) NTPC, Bilaspur (C.G.); The Additional Manager & HR (Head), M/s
Era Infra Engineering Ltd., Noida (U.P); The Project Manager, Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC, Bilaspur
(C.G) and Shri Mohan, Through The President, Chhattisgarh Employees Mazdoor Ekta Sangh, Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 30/10/2022.
[No. L-42011/18/2017-IR (DU)]
D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/54/2017
Present: P.K. Srivastava H.J.S.(Retd.)
Shri Mohan,
C/o Shri Om Prakash Gangotri,
President, Chhattisgarh Kramchari
Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh – 495555.
….Workman
2638 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Versus
The General Manager (O & M)
NTPC, Seepat PO Ujjawal Nagar,
Bilaspur. C.G. - 495555
The Addl. Manager & HR (Head)
M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd.
C-56/41, Sector – 62,
Noida UP – 201301.
The Project Manager,
Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC,
Seepat Site, P.O. Ujjawal Nagar
Bilaspur. C.G. – 495555
…Management
AWARD
(Passed on this 17th day of October-2022)
1. As per letter dated 09/05/2017 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the
reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per
Notification No. L-42011/18/2017 – IR (DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action on the part of M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd, a contractor working
under the principal employer at NTPC, Seepat site in terminating the workman namely
Shri Mohan s/o Shri Jaitram and not paying the terminal benefits as espoused by the
president of the Chattisgarh Kramchari Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur is legal and justified
as per the provisions of section 25 (F) of ID act? If not, what relief the above named
workman is entitled to?
2. After registering the case on the basis of reference, notices were sent to the parties on addresses’
mention in the reference. Workman represented through her learned counsel Adv. Shri S.K. Saini. Management
No. 1 & 2 represented through their learned counsel Adv. Shri R.C.Shrivastava and Adv. Shri Pradeep Kumar
Pandey respectively. Many dates were given for filling of Statement of Claim. No Statement of Claim was
filed. The opposite parties also did not file any Written Statement of Defence.
3. Since the initial burden to prove its case is on the workman side in which he has failed. Hence the
reference deserves to be answered against him and is answered accordingly.
4. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as
per rules.
P.K.SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
DATE: 17-10-2022
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1251.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अन सरण में, केन्रीय
सरकार मिाप्रबंिक (ओ एंड एम) एनटीृीसी, जबलासृ र (सी.िी.); अृर प्रबंिक और मानव संसािन (प्रम ),
मजससा एरा इंफ्रा इंिीजनयररंग जलजमटेड, नोएडा (यू.ृी); ृट्ररयोिना प्रबंिक, एरा इंफ्रा इंिीजनयररंग जलजमटेड
एनटीृीसी, जबलासृ र (सी.िी) के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री जवनोि क मार रे, द्वारा अध्यक्ष, छत्तीसगढ़
कमाचारी मििूर एकता संघ, जबलासृ र, छत्तीसगढ़, के बीच अन बंि में जनर्िाष्ट केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण
एवं श्रम न्यायालय, िबलृ र के ृंचाट (संिभा सं. CGIT/LC/R/55/2017) को िजसा दक अन लग्नक में दि ाया गया
िज, प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्रीय सरकार को सकफ्ट ककृी के सा 30/10/2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा।
[सं. एल- 42011/19/2017-आईआर-(डीयू)]
िी. के. धहमाधशु, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1251.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/LC/R/55/2017) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal cum Labour–Jabalpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to The General Manager (O & M) NTPC, Bilaspur (C.G.); The Additional Manager & HR (Head), M/s
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2639
Era Infra Engineering Ltd., Noida (U.P); The Project Manager, Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC, Bilaspur
(C.G) and Shri Vinod Kumar Khare, Through The President, Chhattisgarh Employees Mazdoor Ekta Sangh,
Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on
30/10/2022.
[No. L-42011/19/2017-IR (DU)]
D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/55/2017
Present: P.K.Srivastava H.J.S. (Retd.)
Shri Vinod Kumar Khare,
C/o Shri Om Prakash Gangotri,
President, Chhattisgarh Kramchari
Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh – 495555.
….Workman
Versus
The General Manager (O & M)
NTPC, Seepat PO Ujjawal Nagar,
Bilaspur. C.G. - 495555
The Addl. Manager & HR (Head)
M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd.
C-56/41, Sector – 62,
Noida UP – 201301.
The Project Manager,
Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC,
Seepat Site, P.O. Ujjawal Nagar
Bilaspur. C.G. – 495555
…Management
AWARD
(Passed on this 17th day of October-2022)
1.
As per letter dated 02/15-05-2017 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the
reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per
Notification No. L-42011/19/2017 – IR (DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action on the part of M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd, a contractor working
under the principal employer at NTPC, Seepat site in terminating the workman namely
Shri Vinod Kumar Khare s/o Shri Banshi Lal and not paying the terminal benefits as
espoused by the president of the Chattisgarh Kramchari Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur
is legal and justified as per the provisions of section 25 (F) of ID act? If not, what relief the
above named workman is entitled to?
2.
After registering the case on the basis of reference, notices were sent to the parties on addresses’
mention in the reference. Workman represented through her learned counsel Adv. Shri S.K.Saini. Management
No. 1 & 2 represented through their learned counsel Adv. Shri R.C.Shrivastava and Adv. Shri Pradeep Kumar
Pandey respectively. Many dates were given for filling of Statement of Claim. No Statement of Claim was
filed. The opposite parties also did not file any Written Statement of Defence.
3.
Since the initial burden to prove its case is on the workman side in which he has failed. Hence the
reference deserves to be answered against him and is answered accordingly.
4.
Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as
per rules.
P.K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
DATE: 17-10-2022
2640 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1252.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अन सरण में,
केन्रीय सरकार महाप्रबंधिक (ओ एधि एम) एनटीपीसी, धबंलासपुर (सी.जी.); अपर प्रबंधिक और मानव सधसािन
(प्रमुि), मैससय एरा इधफ्रा इधजीधनयररधग धलधमटेि, नोएिा (यू.पी); पररयोजना प्रबंधिक, एरा इधफ्रा इधजीधनयररधग
धलधमटेि एनटीपीसी, धबंलासपुर (सी.जी) के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्रीमती कमला, द्वारा अध्यक्ष,
छत्तीसगढ़ कमयिारी मजिूर एकता सधघ, धबंलासपुर, छत्तीसगढ़,के बीच अन बंि में जनर्िाष्ट केन्रीय सरकार vkS|ksfxd
vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] जबंलपुर के ृंचाट (संिभा सं. CGIT/LC/R/57/2017) को जैसा दक अनुलग्नक में
दििाया गया है, प्रकाजित करती िज जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 30/10/2022 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल- 42011/21/2017 - आईआर-(िीयू)]
िी. के. धहमाधशु, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1252.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/LC/R/57/2017) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal cum Labour–Jabalpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to The General Manager (O & M) NTPC, Bilaspur (C.G.); The Additional Manager & HR (Head), M/s
Era Infra Engineering Ltd., Noida (U.P); The Project Manager, Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC, Bilaspur
(C.G) and Smt. Kamla, Through The President, Chhattisgarh Employees Mazdoor Ekta Sangh, Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 30/10/2022.
[No. L- 42011/21/2017 - IR (DU)]
D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/57/2017
Present: P. K. Srivastava H.J.S.(Retd.)
Smt. Kamla,
C/o Shri Om Prakash Gangotri,
President, Chhattisgarh Kramchari
Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh – 495555.
….Workman
Versus
The General Manager (O & M)
NTPC, Seepat PO Ujjawal Nagar,
Bilaspur. C.G. - 495555
The Addl. Manager & HR (Head)
M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd.
C-56/41, Sector – 62,
Noida UP – 201301.
The Project Manager,
Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC,
Seepat Site, P.O. Ujjawal Nagar
Bilaspur. C.G. – 495555.
…Management
AWARD
(Passed on this 17th day of October-2022)
1.
As per letter dated 02/15-05-2017 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the
reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per
Notification No. L-42011/21/2017 – IR (DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action on the part of M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd, a contractor working
under the principal employer at NTPC, Seepat site in terminating the workman namely
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2641
Smt. Kamla w/o Shri Mohan and not paying the terminal benefits as espoused by the
president of the Chattisgarh Kramchari Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur is legal and
justified as per the provisions of section 25 (F) of ID act? If not, what relief the above
named workman is entitled to?
2.
After registering the case on the basis of reference, notices were sent to the parties on addresses’
mention in the reference. Workman represented through her learned counsel Adv. Shri S.K. Saini. Management
No. 1 & 2 represented through their learned counsel Adv. Shri R.C. Shrivastava and Adv. Shri Pradeep Kumar
Pandey respectively. Many dates were given for filling of Statement of Claim. No Statement of Claim was
filed. The opposite parties also did not file any Written Statement of Defence.
3.
Since the initial burden to prove its case is on the workman side in which she has failed. Hence the
reference deserves to be answered against her and is answered accordingly.
4.
Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as
per rules.
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
DATE: 17-10-2022
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1253.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अन सरण में,
केन्रीय सरकार महाप्रबंधिक (ओ एधि एम) एनटीपीसी, धबंलासपुर (सी.जी.); अपर प्रबंधिक और मानव सधसािन
(प्रमुि), मैससय एरा इधफ्रा इधजीधनयररधग धलधमटेि, नोएिा (यू.पी); पररयोजना प्रबंधिक, एरा इधफ्रा इधजीधनयररधग
धलधमटेि एनटीपीसी, धबंलासपुर (सी.जी) के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री िमेंर, द्वारा अध्यक्ष, छत्तीसगढ़
कमयिारी मजिूर एकता सधघ, धबंलासपुर, छत्तीसगढ़, के बीच अन बंि में जनर्िाष्ट केन्रीय सरकार vkS|ksfxd
vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] जबंलपुर के ृंचाट (संिभा सं. CGIT/LC/R/58/2017) को जैसा दक अनुलग्नक में
दििाया गया है, प्रकाजित करती िज जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 30/10/2022 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल- 42011/22/2017 - आईआर-(िीयू)]
िी. के. धहमाधशु, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1253.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/LC/R/58/2017) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal cum Labour–Jabalpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to The General Manager (O & M) NTPC, Bilaspur (C.G.); The Additional Manager & HR (Head), M/s
Era Infra Engineering Ltd., Noida (U.P); The Project Manager, Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC, Bilaspur
(C.G) and Shri Dharmendra, Through The President, Chhattisgarh Employees Mazdoor Ekta Sangh, Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 30/10/2022.
[No. L - 42011/22/2017 - IR (DU)]
D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/58/2017
Present: P.K. Srivastava H.J.S.(Retd.)
Shri Dharmendra,
C/o Shri Om Prakash Gangotri,
President, Chhattisgarh Kramchari
Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh – 495555.
….Workman
Versus
The General Manager (O & M)
NTPC, Seepat PO Ujjawal Nagar,
Bilaspur. C.G. - 495555
2642 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
The Addl. Manager & HR (Head)
M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd.
C-56/41, Sector – 62,
Noida UP – 201301.
The Project Manager,
Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC,
Seepat Site, P.O. Ujjawal Nagar
Bilaspur. C.G. – 495555
…Management
AWARD
(Passed on this 17th day of October-2022)
1. As per letter dated 02/15-05-2017 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the
reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per
Notification No. L-42011/22/2017 – IR (DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action on the part of M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd, a contractor working
under the principal employer at NTPC, Seepat site in terminating the workman namely
shri Dharmendra s/o Shri Sonalal and not paying the terminal benefits as espoused by the
president of the Chattisgarh Kramchari Mazdoor Ekta Union, Bilaspur is legal and
justified as per the provisions of section 25 (F) of ID act? If not, what relief the above
named workman is entitled to?
2. After registering the case on the basis of reference, notices were sent to the parties on addresses’
mention in the reference. Workman represented through his learned counsel Adv. Shri S.K. Saini. Management
No. 1 & 2 represented through their learned counsel Adv. Shri R.C. Shrivastava and Adv. Shri Pradeep Kumar
Pandey respectively. Many dates were given for filling of Statement of Claim. No Statement of Claim was
filed. The opposite parties also did not file any Written Statement of Defence.
3. Since the initial burden to prove its case is on the workman side in which he has failed. Hence the
reference deserves to be answered against him and is answered accordingly.
4. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as
per rules.
P.K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
DATE: 17-10-2022
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1254.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अन सरण में,
केन्रीय सरकार महाप्रबंधिक (ओ एधि एम) एनटीपीसी, धबंलासपुर (सी.जी.); अपर प्रबंधिक और मानव सधसािन
(प्रमुि), मैससय एरा इधफ्रा इधजीधनयररधग धलधमटेि, नोएिा (यू.पी); पररयोजना प्रबंधिक, एरा इधफ्रा इधजीधनयररधग
धलधमटेि एनटीपीसी, धबंलासपुर (सी.जी) के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और अध्यक्ष, छत्तीसगढ़ कमयिारी मजिूर
एकता सधघ, धबंलासपुर, छत्तीसगढ़,के बीच अन बंि में जनर्िाष्ट केन्रीय सरकार vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je
U;k;ky;] जबंलपुर के ृंचाट (संिभा सं. CGIT/LC/R/141/2017) को जैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दििाया गया है,
प्रकाजित करती िज जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 30/10/2022 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल- 42011/109/2017- आईआर-(िीयू)]
िी.के. धहमाधशु, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1254.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/LC/R/141/2017) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal cum Labour–Jabalpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to The General Manager (O & M) NTPC, Bilaspur (C.G.); The Additional Manager & HR (Head), M/s
Era Infra Engineering Ltd., Noida (U.P); The Project Manager, Era Infra Engineering Ltd. NTPC, Bilaspur
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2643
(C.G) and The President, Chhattisgarh Employees Mazdoor Ekta Sangh, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, which was
received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 30/10/2022.
[No. L- 42011/109/2017- IR (DU)]
D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/141/2017
Present: P.K. Srivastava H.J.S..( Retd)
Shri Om Prakash Gangotri
President,
Chhattisgarh Kramchari Mazdoor Ekta Union,
Bilaspur (C.G.)-495006
…Workman
Versus
The Project Manager
Era Infra Engineering Ltd.
NTPC, Seepat, PO-Ujjwal Nagar,
District Bilaspur (CG-495006)
The Additional Manager & HR (Head)
M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd.
C-56/41.Sector 62, Noida (UP)-201301.
The General Manager (O&M)
NTPC Seepat, PO-Ujjwal Nagar,
Bilaspur (C.G.) 495006
…Management
AWARD
(Passed on this 10th day of October-2022.)
1.
As per letter dated 24/10/2017 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the
reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per
Notification No. L-42011/109/2017-IR(DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action of the management on the pat of M/s Era Infra Engineering Ltd. A
contractor working under the Principal Employer at NTPC, Seepat site in terminating
the workman namely Shri Hemraj singh S/o Shri Uday Singh and not paying the terminal
benefits as espoused by the President of Chhattisgarh Karamchari Mazdoor Ekta Union,
Bilaspur is legal and justified without complying the provisions of Section 25(f) of the ID
Act? If Not, what relief the above named workman is entitled to? .”
2.
After registering the case on the basis of reference, notices were sent to the parties. Parties were
served. They appeared through their learned counsel.
3.
The workman did not file any statement of claim. Management also preferred not to file any written
statement of defence.
4.
The reference is the issue for determination in the case in hand.
5.
The initial burden to prove the claim is on the workman in which he has miserably failed, hence
holding the claim of the workman not proved the reference is answered against the workman.
6.
On the basis of the above discussion, following award is passed:-
A. The action of the management as mentioned in the reference is held to be just and
proper.
B. The workman is held entitled to no relief.
2644 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
7. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as
per rules.
P.K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
DATE: 10-10-2022
नई दिल्ली, 30 नवम् बर, 2022
का.आ. 1255.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अन सरण में,
केन्रीय सरकार मेससय एनटीपीसी जीई पावर सर्वयसेज प्रा. धलधमटेि, नोएिा, गाधजयाबंाि (यूपी); मैसर्स साधवत्री
कधस्रक्शन, कोरबंा (छ.ग.); काययकारी धनिेशक,एनटीपीसी धलधमटेि लारा, रायगढ़ (छ.ग.) के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध
जनयोिकों और श्री सरोज कुमार गुप्ता और 58 अन्द्य,कामगार, के बीच अन बंि में जनर्िाष्ट केन्रीय सरकार vkS|ksfxd
vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] जबंलपुर के ृंचाट (संिभा सं. CGIT/LC/R/66/2020) को जैसा दक अनुलग्नक में
दििाया गया है, प्रकाजित करती िज जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 30/10/2022 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल- 42011/123/2020-आईआर-(िीयू)]
िी.के. धहमाधशु, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th November, 2022
S.O. 1255.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/LC/R/66/2020) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal cum Labour–Jabalpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to M/s NTPC GE Power Services Pvt. Ltd., Noida, Ghaziabad (U.P.); M/s Savitri Construction, Korba
(Chhattisgarh);The Executive Director, NTPC Ltd. Lara, Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) and Shri Saroj Kumar Gupta &
58 others, Worker, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on
30/10/2022.
[No. L- 42011/123/2020 - IR (DU)]
D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/66/2020
Present: P.K. Srivastava H.J.S.(Retd.)
Shri Saroj Kumar Gupta & 58 others,
At/Po - Tinmini, Block – Pussore,
Raigarh, Chhattisgarh – 496001
….Workman
Versus
M/s NTPC GE Power Services Pvt. Ltd.,
6th Floor, Tower B, Indian Glycols Ltd. Building,
Plot No.2, B, Near Lotus Valley School,
Sector – 126, Noida, Ghaziabad (U.P.) - 201303
M/s Savitri Construction,
Mig/96, Shivaji Nagar, Korba,
Korba (Chhattisgarh) – 495400
The Executive Director,
NTPC Ltd. Lara,
Vill - Chhapora, P.O. – Pussore,
Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) – 496001
…Management
AWARD
(Passed on this 17th day of October-2022)
1. As per letter dated 06-11-2020 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the
reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section 10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per
Notification No. L-42011/123/2020 – IR (DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2645
"Whether the action of the management of M/s. Savitri Construction ( Sub contractor),
M/s. NTPC GE Power Service Pvt. Ltd (Main Contractor) and NTPC Ltd, Lara,
Raigarh (Principal Employer) of not making payment of terminal dues to Sh. Saroj
Kumar Gupta and 58 other workers as per the list (Annexure-A-4) is proper, legal and
justified? If not, to what relief the workers are entitled to and what directions, if any,
are necessary in the matter?"
2. After registering the case on the basis of reference, notices were sent to the parties on addresses’
mention in the reference and were served on them.. Workman and 03rd party M/s Savitri Construction failed to
appear and participate in reference proceeding. Adv. Shri Aditya Pratap Singh and Adv. Shri R.C.Shrivastava
represented for M/s NTPC GE Power Services Pvt. Ltd., and NTPC Ltd. Lara respectively. Many dates were
given for filling of Statement of Claim. No Statement of Claim was filed. The opposite parties also did not file
any Written Statement of Defence.
3. Since the initial burden to prove its case is on the workman side in which he has failed. Hence the
reference deserves to be answered against him and is answered accordingly.
4. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as
per rules.
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
DATE: 17-10-2022
नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर, 2022
का.आ. 1256.—औद्योधगक धववाि अधिधनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में
केन्द्रीय सरकार मेससय तधमलनािु धमनरल्स धलधमटेि, िेन्नई के प्रबंधितधत्र के सधबंद्ध धनयोजकों और श्री वी. रामास्वामी,
सलेम बंीि अनुबंधि में धनर्ियष्ट औद्योधगक धववाि में केन्रीय सरकार औद्योधगक अधिकरण एवध श्रम न्द्यायालय, िेन्नई
के पधिाट (सधिभय सध. 521/2001) को प्रकाधशत करती है।
[सं. एल -29012/37/1998-IR(M)]
vk'kh"k dqekj ;kno, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 2nd December, 2022
S.O. 1256.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 521/2001) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal/Labour Court, Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd., Chennai and Shri V. Ramaswamy, Salem.
[No. L- 29012/37/1998-IR(M)]
ASHISH KUMAR YADAV, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT
CHENNAI
ID No. 521/2001
Present:
DIPTI MOHAPATRA, LL.M. PRESIDING OFFICER
Date: 22.09.2022
Sh. V. Ramaswamy
Seeliampatti
Attur Taluk
Salem-636001
….1st Party/Petitioner
AND
M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd
The Chairman-cum-Managing Director
31. Kamarajar Salai, TWAD House
Chepauk, PO 2961
Chennai-600005 ….2nd Party/Respondent
2646 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Appearance:
For the First Party Petitioner
….Advocate, Sri Ajoy Khose
For the Second Party Respondent
…Advocate, Sri T.R. Sathiyamohan
AWARD
1.
The Central Government, Ministry of Labour & Employment vide its Order No. L-29012/37/98/IR(M)
dtd. 08.09.1998 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.
The schedule mentioned in that order is:
“Whether Shri V. Ramasamy, Ex-Chisleman worked on piece rate basis is a workman
within the meaning of Section 2(S) of Industrial Dispute Act, 1947? If Shri
V. Ramasamy is a workman, whether the action of management of Tamil Nadu
Minerals Ltd., Chennai in denying the employment to him with effect from December,
1994 is justified or not? If not justified, to what relief Shri V. Ramasamy is entitled?”
2. It is pertinent to mention that pursuant to the order of Ministry of Labour and Employment,
Government of India, the case record was transferred to CGIT by the State Industrial Tribunal vide it’s letter
dtd 25.01.2001. On receipt, the record was taken to file as ID 521/2001 on dtd. 19.02.2001.
3.
Since the claim Statement and the Counter Statement have already been filed by both the parties prior
to the receipt of the Record from State Tribunal, due order was passed for issuance of Notice to the
Representing Counsel fixing the case to 08.03.2001. The case was posted to several dates for almost for two
years for the same purpose. On 24.07.2002, the Representing Counsels for both parties were present and Memo
was filed informing that the Hon’ble Court granted stay of the proceedings which is supported vide Order of the
Hon’ble Court in WP 25370/2002 and WMP 34858/2002 dtd. 17.07.2002. The proceeding was stayed till a
Common Order of the Hon’ble Court dismissing the Writ Petition No. 12334/2004 and WMP 14413/2004 dated
03.11.2020 (received on 11.02.2021) in respect of entire batch cases including the case in hand. Accordingly,
the case was re-scheduled for further proceeding vide order dtd. 13.04.2021. The case was listed for further
proceeding. Due information was provided to the parties through the official website and through Notice
Board. There was change of Vakalat. The Learned Counsel sought for time to produce the Petitioner and to file
Affidavit Evidence. Despite of several adjournments from the date of aforesaid High Court Order (Almost 8
adjournments) till 30.04.2022, neither the Petitioner appeared nor filed any Affidavit evidence. However
without resorting to any coercive steps against the Petitioner, he was afforded with two more chances vide dtd.
31.05.2022 and 13.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on those dates. On the other hand the Learned
Counsel for the Petitioner submitted “No Instruction” and prays to dispose of the proceeding as deems fit. None
on behalf of the Respondent was present. Since the Hon’ble Court directed for expeditious disposal, the
Tribunal viewed sympathetically and afforded both parties to file their respective Affidavit Evidence listing the
case to 15,06.2022 and 29.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on those dates nor filed Affidavit Evidence.
None appeared for Respondent. However, for the interest of justice the case was finally listed to 11.07.2022.
Even on that day, the Petitioner did not turn up nor filed any Affidavit Evidence.
4
The material borne out from the discussion in preceding paragraphs, undoubtedly projects the fact that
the Petitioner is not interested to proceed with the case. It is held that there exists no dispute for
adjudication as referred by the Appropriate Govt.
5. In the result the reference is answered against the Petitioner.
6. An Award is passed accordingly.
(Dictated and transcribed by PA and corrected and pronounced in the open court on this day the 22.09.2022)
Witnesses Examined:
For the 1st Party Petitioner
:
Nil
For the 2nd Party Respondent
:
Nil
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2647
Documents Marked:
On the Petitioner & Management side
:
Nil
DIPTI MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर, 2022
का.आ. 1257.—औद्योधगक धववाि अधिधनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में
केन्द्रीय सरकार मेससय तधमलनािु धमनरल्स धलधमटेि, िेन्नई के प्रबंधितधत्र के सधबंद्ध धनयोजकों और श्री एल.
पेररयासामी, सलेम बंीि अनुबंधि में धनर्ियष्ट औद्योधगक धववाि में केन्रीय सरकार औद्योधगक अधिकरण एवध श्रम
न्द्यायालय, िेन्नई के पधिाट (सधिभय सध. 522/2001) को प्रकाधशत करती है।
[सं. एल-29012/41/1998-IR(M)]
vk'kh"k dqekj ;kno, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 2nd December, 2022
S.O. 1257.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 522/2001) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal/Labour Court, Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd., Chennai and Shri L. Periasamy, Salem.
[No. L-29012/41/1998-IR(M)]
ASHISH KUMAR YADAV, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM LABOUR COURT
CHENNAI
ID No. 522/2001
Present: DIPTI MOHAPATRA, LL.M. Presiding Officer
Date: 22.09.2022
Sh. Periasamy
Melthombai, Keeripatti Post
Attur Taluk
Salem-636001
…1st Party/Petitioner
AND
M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd
The Chairman-cum-Managing Director
31. Kamarajar Salai, TWAD House
Chepauk, PO 2961
Chennai-600005
…2nd Party/Respondent
Appearance:
For the First Party Petitioner
…Advocate, Sri Ajoy Khose
For the Second Party Respondent
…Advocate, Sri T.R. Sathiyamohan
AWARD
The Central Government, Ministry of Labour & Employment vide its Order No. L-29012/41/98/IR(M)
dtd. 08.09.1998 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.
The schedule mentioned in that order is:
“Whether Shri L.. Periasamy, Ex-Chisleman worked on piece rate basis is a workman
within the meaning of Section 2(S) of Industrial Dispute Act, 1947? If Shri L. Periasamy is
a workman, whether the action of management of Tamil Nadu Minerals Ltd., Chennai in
denying the employment to him with effect from December,1994 is justified or not? If not
justified, to what relief Shri L. Periasamy is entitled?”
2648 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2.
It is pertinent to mention that pursuant to the order of Ministry of Labour and Employment,
Government of India, the case record was transferred to CGIT by the State Industrial Tribunal vide it’s letter
dtd 25.01.2021. On receipt, the record was taken to file as ID 522/2001 on dtd. 19.02.2001.
3.
Since the claim Statement and the Counter Statement have already been filed by both the parties prior
to the receipt of the Record from State Tribunal, due order was passed for issuance of Notice to the
Representing Counsel fixing the case to 08.03.2001. The case was posted to several dates for almost for two
years for the same purpose. On 24.07.2002, the Representing Counsels for both parties were present and
Memo was filed informing that the Hon’ble Court granted stay of the proceedings which is supported vide
Order of the Hon’ble Court in WP 25370/2002 and WMP 34858/2002 dtd. 17.07.2002. The proceeding was
stayed till a Common Order of the Hon’ble Court dismissing the Writ Petition No. 12334/2004 and WMP
14413/2004 dated 03.11.2020 (received on 11.02.2021) in respect of entire batch cases including the case in
hand. Accordingly, the case was re-scheduled for further proceeding vide order dtd. 13.04.2021. The case was
listed for further proceeding. Due information was provided to the parties through the official website and
through Notice Board. There was change of Vakalat. The Learned Counsel sought for time to produce the
Petitioner and to file Affidavit Evidence. Despite of several adjournments from the date of aforesaid High
Court Order (Almost 8 adjournments) till 28.04.2022, neither the Petitioner appeared nor filed any Affidavit
evidence. However without resorting to any coercive steps against the Petitioner, he was afforded with two
more chances vide dtd. 31.05.2022 and 13.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on those dates. On the other
hand the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted “No Instruction” and prays to dispose of the proceeding
as deems fit. None on behalf of the Respondent was present. Since the Hon’ble Court directed for expeditious
disposal, the Tribunal viewed sympathetically and afforded both parties to file their respective Affidavit
Evidence listing the case to 15.06.2022 and 29.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on those dates nor filed
Affidavit Evidence. None appeared for Respondent. However, for the interest of justice the case was finally
listed to 11.07.2022. Even on that day, the Petitioner did not turn up nor filed any Affidavit Evidence.
4.
The material borne out from the discussion in preceding paragraphs, undoubtedly projects the fact that
the Petitioner is not interested to proceed with the case. It is held that there exists no dispute for adjudication as
referred by the Appropriate Govt.
5.
In the result the reference is answered against the Petitioner.
6.
An Award is passed accordingly.
(Dictated and transcribed by PA and corrected and pronounced in the open ourt on this day the 22.09.2022)
Witnesses Examined:
For the 1st Party Petitioner
:
Nil
For the 2nd Party Respondent
: Nil
Documents Marked:
On the Petitioner & Management side
:
Nil
DIPTI MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर, 2022
का.आ. 1258.—औद्योधगक धववाि अधिधनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में
केन्द्रीय सरकार मेससय तधमलनािु धमनरल्स धलधमटेि, िेन्नई के प्रबंधितधत्र के सधबंद्ध धनयोजकों और श्री पी. कृष्णन,
सलेम बंीि अनुबंधि में धनर्ियष्ट औद्योधगक धववाि में केन्रीय सरकार औद्योधगक अधिकरण एवध श्रम न्द्यायालय, िेन्नई
के पधिाट (सधिभय सध. 523/2001) को प्रकाधशत करती है।
[सं. एल-29012/38/1998-IR(M)]
vk'kh"k dqekj ;kno, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 2nd December, 2022
S.O. 1258.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.523/2001) of the Central Government Industrial
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2649
Tribunal/Labour Court, Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd., Chennai and Shri P. Krishnan, Salem.
[No. L-29012/38/1998-IR(M)]
ASHISH KUMAR YADAV, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT
CHENNAI
ID No. 523/2001
Present: DIPTI MOHAPATRA, LL.M. PRESIDING OFFICER
Date: 22.09.2022
Sh. P. Krishnan
Senguttaikadu, Keeripatti Post
Attur Taluk
Salem-636001
…1st Party/Petitioner
AND
M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd
The Chairman-cum-Managing Director
31. Kamarajar Salai, TWAD House
Chepauk, PO 2961
Chennai-600005
…2nd Party/Respondent
Appearance:
For the First Party Petitioner
…Advocate, Sri Ajoy Khose
For the Second Party Respondent
…Advocate, Sri T.R. Sathiyamohan
AWARD
The Central Government, Ministry of Labour & Employment vide its Order No. L-29012/38/98/IR
(M) dtd. 08.09.1998 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.
The schedule mentioned in that order is:
“Whether Shri P. Krishnan, Ex-Chisleman worked on piece rate basis is a workman
within the meaning of Section 2(S) of Industrial Dispute Act, 1947? If Shri P.
Krishnan is a workman, whether the action of management of Tamil Nadu Minerals
Ltd., Chennai in denying the employment to him with effect from December,1994 is
justified or not? If not justified, to what relief Shri P. Krishnan is entitled?”
2.
It is pertinent to mention that pursuant to the order of Ministry of Labour and Employment,
Government of India, the case record was transferred to CGIT by the State Industrial Tribunal vide it’s letter
dtd 25.01.2021. On receipt, the record was taken to file as ID 523/2001 on dtd. 20.02.2001.
3.
Since the claim Statement and the Counter Statement have already been filed by both the parties prior
to the receipt of the Record from State Tribunal, due order was passed for issuance of Notice to the
Representing Counsel fixing the case to 08.03.2001. The case was posted to several dates for almost for two
years for the same purpose. On 24.07.2002, the Representing Counsels for both parties were present and Memo
was filed informing that the Hon’ble Court granted stay of the proceedings which is supported vide Order of the
Hon’ble Court in WP 25370/2002 and WMP 34858/2002 dtd. 17.07.2002. The proceeding was stayed till a
Common Order of the Hon’ble Court dismissing the Writ Petition No. 12334/2004 and WMP 14413/2004 dated
03.11.2020 (received on 11.02.2021) in respect of entire batch cases including the case in hand. Accordingly,
the casewas re-scheduled for further proceeding vide order dtd. 13.04.2021. The case was listed for further
proceeding. Due information was provided to the parties through the official website and through Notice Board.
There was change of Vakalat. The Learned Counsel sought for time to produce the Petitioner and to file
Affidavit Evidence. Despite of several adjournments from the date of aforesaid High Court Order (Almost 8
adjournments) till 28.04.2022, neither the Petitioner appeared nor filed any Affidavit evidence. However
2650 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
without resorting to any coercive steps against the Petitioner, he was afforded with two more chances vide dtd.
31.05.2022 and 13.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on those dates. On the other hand the Learned
Counsel for the Petitioner submitted “No Instruction” and prays to dispose of the proceeding as deems fit. None
on behalf of the Respondent was present. Since the Hon’ble Court directed for expeditious disposal, the
Tribunal viewed sympathetically and afforded both parties to file their respective Affidavit Evidence listing the
case to 15,06.2022 and 29.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on those dates nor filed Affidavit Evidence.
None appeared for Respondent. However, for the interest of justice the case was finally listed to 11.07.2022.
Even on that day, the Petitioner did not turn up nor filed any Affidavit Evidence.
4.
The material borne out from the discussion in preceding paragraphs, undoubtedly projects the fact that
the Petitioner is not interested to proceed with the case. It is held that there exists no dispute for adjudication as
referred by the Appropriate Govt.
5.
In the result the reference is answered against the Petitioner.
6.
An Award is passed accordingly.
7.
(Dictated and transcribed by PA and corrected and pronounced in the open court on this day the
22.09.2022)
Witnesses Examined:
For the 1st Party Petitioner
:
Nil
For the 2nd Party Respondent
: Nil
Documents Marked:
On the Petitioner & Management side
:
Nil
DIPTI MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर, 2022
का.आ. 1259.—औद्योधगक धववाि अधिधनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में
केन्द्रीय सरकार मेससय तधमलनािु धमनरल्स धलधमटेि, िेन्नई के प्रबंधितधत्र के सधबंद्ध धनयोजकों और
श्री आर. राजमाइकम, पुत्र श्री रामहलधगम, सलेम बंीि अनुबंधि में धनर्ियष्ट औद्योधगक धववाि में केन्रीय सरकार
औद्योधगक अधिकरण एवध श्रम न्द्यायालय, िेन्नई के पधिाट (सधिभय सध. 524/2001) को प्रकाधशत करती है।
[सं. एल-29012/43/1998-IR(M)]
vk'kh"k dqekj ;kno, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 2nd December, 2022
S.O. 1259.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 524/2001) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal/Labour Court, Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd., Chennai and Shri R. Rajamaickam, S/o Shri
Ramalingam, Salem.
[No. L-29012/43/1998-IR(M)]
ASHISH KUMAR YADAV, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT
CHENNAI
ID No. 524/2001
Present: DIPTI MOHAPATRA, LL.M. PRESIDING OFFICER
Date: 22.09.2022
Sh. R. Rajamanickam
S/o Ramalingam
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2651
Ecchampatti, Seeliampatti Post
Attur Taluk
Salem-636001
…1st Party/Petitioner
AND
M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd
The Chairman-cum-Managing Director
31. Kamarajar Salai, TWAD House
Chepauk, PO 2961
Chennai-600005
…2nd Party/Respondent
Appearance:
For the First Party Petitioner
…Advocate, Sri Ajoy Khose
For the Second Party Respondent
…Advocate, Sri T.R. Sathiyamohan
AWARD
The Central Government, Ministry of Labour & Employment vide its Order No. L-29012/43/98/IR
(M) dtd. 08.09.1998 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.
The schedule mentioned in that order is:
“Whether Shri R. Rajamanickam, Ex-Chisleman worked on piece rate basis is a workman
within the meaning of Section 2(S) of Industrial Dispute Act, 1947? If Shri R.
Rajamanickam is a workman, whether the action of management of Tamil Nadu Minerals
Ltd., Chennai in denying the employment to him with effect from December,1994 is justified
or not? If not justified, to what relief Shri R. Rajamanickam is entitled?”
2. It is pertinent to mention that pursuant to the order of Ministry of Labour and Employment,
Government of India, the case record was transferred to CGIT by the State Industrial Tribunal vide it’s
letter dtd 25.01.2021. On receipt, the record was taken to file as ID 524/2001 on dtd. 20.02.2001.
3. Since the claim Statement and the Counter Statement have already been filed by both the parties prior
to the receipt of the Record from State Tribunal, due order was passed for issuance of Notice to the
Representing Counsel fixing the case to 09.03.2001. The case was posted to several dates for almost for two
years for the same purpose. On 24.07.2002, the Representing Counsels for both parties were present and Memo
was filed informing that the Hon’ble Court granted stay of the proceedings which is supported vide Order
of the Hon’ble Court in WP 25370/2002 and WMP 34858/2002 dtd. 17.07.2002. The proceeding was stayed
till a Common Order of the Hon’ble Court dismissing the Writ Petition No. 12334/2004 and WMP 14413/2004
dated 03.11.2020 (received on 11.02.2021) in respect of entire batch cases including the case in hand.
Accordingly, the case was re-scheduled for further proceeding vide order dtd. 13.04.2021. The case was listed
for further proceeding. Due information was provided to the parties through the official website and through
Notice Board. There was change of Vakalat. The Learned Counsel sought for time to produce the Petitioner
and to file Affidavit Evidence. Despite of several adjournments from the date of aforesaid High Court Order
(Almost 8 adjournments) till 28.04.2022, neither the Petitioner appeared nor filed any Affidavit evidence.
However without resorting to any coercive steps against the Petitioner, he was afforded with two more chances
vide dtd. 31.05.2022 and 13.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on those dates. On the other hand the
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted “No Instruction” and prays to dispose of the proceeding as deems
fit. None on behalf of the Respondent was present. Since the Hon’ble Court directed for expeditious disposal,
the Tribunal viewed sympathetically and afforded both parties to file their respective Affidavit Evidence listing
the case to 15,06.2022 and 29.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on those dates nor filed Affidavit
Evidence. None appeared for Respondent. However, for the interest of justice the case was finally listed to
11.07.2022. Even on that day, the Petitioner did not turn up nor filed any Affidavit Evidence.
4.
The material borne out from the discussion in preceding paragraphs, undoubtedly projects the fact that
the Petitioner is not interested to proceed with the case. It is held that there exists no dispute for adjudication as
referred by the Appropriate Govt.
5.
In the result the reference is answered against the Petitioner.
6.
An Award is passed accordingly.
7.
(Dictated and transcribed by PA and corrected and pronounced in the open court on this day the
22.09.2022)
Witnesses Examined:
For the 1st Party Petitioner
:
Nil
2652 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
For the 2nd Party Respondent
:
Nil
Documents Marked:
On the Petitioner & Management side :
Nil
DIPTI MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर, 2022
का.आ. 1260.—औद्योधगक धववाि अधिधनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में
केन्द्रीय सरकार एयरपोटय अथॉररटी ऑफ़ इधिया, नई दिल्ली के प्रबंधितधत्र के सधबंद्ध धनयोजकों और श्री राम हसधह
सेजवाल, पुत्र श्री ररशाल हसधह सेजवाल, नई दिल्ली बंीि अनुबंधि में धनर्ियष्ट औद्योधगक धववाि में केन्रीय सरकार
औद्योधगक अधिकरण एवध श्रम न्द्यायालय-2, नई दिल्ली के पधिाट (सधिभय सध. 32/2004) को प्रकाधशत करती है।
[सं. एल-11012/25/2003-IR(M)]
vk'kh"k dqekj ;kno, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 2nd December, 2022
S.O. 1260.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 32/2004) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal/Labour Court-2, New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the
employers in relation to the management of Airport Authority of India, New Delhi and Shri Ram Singh
Sejwal, S/o Shri Rishal Singh Sejwal, New Delhi.
[No. L-11012/25/2003-IR(M)]
ASHISH KUMAR YADAV, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II, NEW DELHI.
Present: Smt. Pranita Mohanty, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-Cum-Labour
Court-II, New Delhi.
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 32/2004
Date of Passing Award- 02.11.2022
BETWEEN:
Shri Ram Singh Sejwal,
S/o Shri Rishal Singh Sejwal,
R/o 102-A, Khikhra Wali Gali,
No.1 Lado Sarai Mehrauli
New Delhi-
…Workman
Versus
The Assistant General Manager (P)
Airport Authority of India, Terminal-I,
Palam New Delhi- 110037
…. Management
Appearances:-
Shri Vinay Singh ….For the claimant
(A/R)
Shri Hardik Bedi …For the Management
(A/R)
AWARD
The Government of India in Ministry of Labour & Employment has referred the present dispute
existing between employer i.e. the management of Airport Authority of India, Terminal-I, and its
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2653
workman/claimant herein, under clause (d) of sub section (1)and sub section (2A) of section 10 of the
Industrial Dispute Act 1947 vide letter No. L-11012/25/2003 (IR(M) dated 21/01/2004 to this tribunal for
adjudication to the following effect.
“Whether the action of the management of Airport Authority of India, Terminal-I,
Palam, New Delhi in terminating the services of Shri Ram Singh Sejwal, Ex-Trafic
Warden/Sharp Shooter w.e.f 06.06.2000 is just, fair and legal? If not, to what relief the
workman concerned is entitled?”
This order deals with the grievance of the claimant with regard to the punishment imposed on him in
the domestic inquiry which he describes as unreasonably disproportionate to the charge leveled against him.
In order to consider the facts and grievance of the claimant, it is necessary to set out the relevant facts
as per the claim statement in detail.
The claimant at the relevant time i.e on 05.10.1997, was working as a Traffic Warden and posted at
IGI Airport Terminal no 2 and on duty at PAX entry Gate No 2. On that day a foreigner guest, a Dutch Lady
made a complaint against the claimant for exhibiting indecent behavior to her. A preliminary fact finding
inquiry was held during which the complainant identified the claimant of this proceeding as the wrong doer. She
also lodged a criminal complaint with police on that day and FIR u/s 354 and 509 IPC was registered against the
claimant. The management on 07.10.1997, in contemplation of a domestic inquiry, placed the claimant under
suspension. Charge heads were served on the claimant and the inquiry officer was appointed. The inquiry
proceeded with the participation of the charged employee and at the end of the inquiry, the inquiry officer
submitted his report to the disciplinary authority with a finding that the charges standproved. On receipt of the
said report the disciplinary authority, served a copy of that report, calling the charged employee to submit his
reply. The reply submitted was found not satisfactory and the disciplinary authority imposed the punishment of
dismissal from service against the claimant. Being aggrieved, though the workman had preferred a departmental
appeal, the same was decided against him and the order passed by the disciplinary authority was confirmed.
Feeling aggrieved, the claimant has raised this Industrial Dispute.
On completion of pleadings by the parties, issues were framed and the issue relating to the fairness of
the inquiry was taken up as the preliminary issue. After considering the evidence adduced by both the parties
with regard to the said preliminary issue, this Tribunal by order dt 17.12.2019, arrived at a conclusion that the
domestic inquiry was not conducted fairly by giving proper opportunity to the charged employee of setting up
his defence. Hence the said inquiry was held to be vitiated and opportunity was given to the
Respondent/Management for adducing evidence and proved the charge and establish that the punishment
imposed commensurate the charge.
The management examined the inquiry officer of the domestic inquiry, who was not examined during
the preliminary issue hearing and also relied upon the inquiry report and proceeding, already placed on record
during the preliminary issue hearing. The claimant workman did not adduce further evidence and expressed that
he relies upon the evidence adduced by him during the preliminary issue hearing.
At the outset of the argument, the learned AR for the Respondent/Management submitted that the
inquiry officer could not be examined during the preliminary issue hearing. The inquiry report and proceeding
placed on record could not be proved in absence of the inquiry officer and this Tribunal consequently decided
the said issue against the management. Now the inquiry officer during his examination proved those inquiry
proceeding and records relating to the same including his report and order of the disciplinary authority. His oral
evidence coupled with the documentary evidence proves the charge .he also argued in favour of the
proportionality of the punishment and submitted that the alleged incident was highlighted in the news papers.
The victim was a foreign national and the incident had tarnished the image of the respondent impacting the
business activities. The claimant was also found involved in disciplined activities in the past and was proceeded
by departmental inquiry and minor punishment was also imposed on him. Hence the recurrence of the behavior
was viewed seriously and punishment was appropriately imposed.
The claimant who argued in person submitted that no previous charge against him has been proved.
For the efficient discharge of duty, he was awarded twice in the past by his employer. Moreover the criminal
case filed against him ended in acquittal as the charge could not be proved. The Respondent though aware of the
result of the criminal case, as an act of vindication, imposed the major penalty and the order f dismissal is harsh
and disproportionate. He also argued that for last 25 years he is fighting against the injustice meted out to him.
The law is well settled that even if the inquiry is found to be fair, that would be only a finding
certifying that all possible opportunities were afforded to the delinquent employee to set up a defence. But that
would not mean that the inquiry officer and the disciplinary authority had arrived at a legal and proper finding.
It is the Industrial Tribunal only, who, by exercising power u/s 11 A of the ID Act can look into and analyze the
evidence and examine if the charges have been proved. Once it is held that the charges against the employee are
2654 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
proved, it will examine the proportionality of the punishment. The Hon’ble SC in the case of General
Secretary, South Indian Cashew Factory Workers’ Union vs. The MD Kerala State Cashew Development
Corporation (2006) LLR 657, SC and in the case of Usha Breco Mazdoor Sangh vs. Management of Usha
Breco Ltd2008(118)FLR400 SC have held that after amendment and incorporation of sec 11A in the ID Act
the Industrial Tribunal is authorized to examine all the materials placed before it, which includes the evidence
adduce during the domestic inquiry.
In this case the management being called upon to adduce evidence and prove the charge, examined
Shri Bhola Ram who is non other than the inquiry officer in the domestic inquiry held against the claimant. He
proved the inquiry proceeding and the report prepared by him as ext MW1/5. In his oral testimony he stated that
the inquiry continued for ¾ months and the claimant with his defence assistant was attending the same
regularly. The said proceeding record shows that altogether 5 charges were framed against the claimant and the
respondent department had examined three witnesses who were the DGM(Airport 2) and the Sr. Airport
Manager and the AirPort Manager. Besides the witnesses,6 documents were produced which included the copy
of the FIR, Charge Sheet, photo copies of the log book entry and photo copies of the news paper clippings.
Before commencement of the inquiry, the copies of all the documents were supplied to the charged employee
who acknowledged the same. The procedure of inquiry was also explained to him. During inquiry the
photocopy of the FIR lodged through the Airport Manger was proved. The Airport manager Azad Singh
confirmed that in his presence the foreigner lady, the victim identified the claimant as the wrong doer. This
evidence of the department witness the Air Port Manger was corroborated by the defence witness Jag Jivan
Prasad, who said that the victim passenger identified the claimant as the wrong doer in his presence. In view of
the same the inquiry officer did not accept that no misbehavior was shown by the claimant to the passenger. The
inquiry officer came to hold that no plausible reasons are evident as to why a foreigner passenger having no axe
to grind against the workman facing the charge shall depose and implicate him falsely. Thus in view of the
evidence, the principal charge against the claimant stands proved. The other charges were with regard to the
unwarranted and unbecoming behavior of an employee, which according to the inquiry officer were
consequently proved and accepted by this Tribunal.
On behalf of the claimant argument was advanced that the criminal case had ended in acquittal before
the inquiry was concluded. This fact was brought to the notice of the inquiry officer, but never considered as he
prepared the report in a pre occupied manner. The disciplinary authority and the appellate authority never
considered this aspect too. Thus he argued that for a lone incident of alleged misconduct the harshest
punishment was imposed on him. In reply argument the learned AR for the management described about many
such previous incidents in which the claimant was facing departmental inquiry and punishment was imposed on
him. But no evidence to that effect was placed onrecord.
In the case of Regional Manager U.P.S R TC, Etawah & others VS Hotilal and another, 2003(3)
SCC 605, referred in the later case of U.P.SRTC VS Nanhelal Kushwaha (2009) 8 SCC, 772, the Hon’ble
Apex Court have held that “The court or Tribunal while dealing with the quantum of punishment has to record
reason as to why it is felt that the punishment inflicted do not commensurate with the proved charge. A mere
statement that the punishment is not proportionate would not suffice. It is not only the amount involved ,but the
mental set up, the type of the duty performed and similar relevant circumstances, which go into the decision
making process are to be considered while deciding the proportionality of the punishment awarded.”
But as stated in the preceding paragraph, the allegation against the claimant was of the indecent
behavior shown to a foreigner passenger. But the evidence on record does not show that in the past the claimant
was found guilty for alleged misconduct. The argument of the learned AR with regard to the past misconduct
shown by the claimant is not supported by any evidence. The claimant on the contrary has adduced evidence of
his past good deeds earning him rewards..
The learned AR for the management while placing reliance in the judgment of the Hon’ble SC in the
case of M/S Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co of India vs. The Management And Others argued that the
discretion vested in the Tribunal u/s 11-A should be judiciously exercised. The crux of his argument is that the
punishment imposed on the claimant is appropriate to the charge and the Tribunal should not interfere.In the
case of Firestone referred supra, the Hon’ble SC have held that after incorporation of the provision of sec 11A
in the ID Act, the Tribunal in order to record a finding on the fairness of the domestic inquiry or the
proportionality of the punishment, can not be confined to the materials which were available at the domestic
inquiry. On the other hand ‘material on record’ in the proviso to sec 11A of the ID Act must be held to refer the
materials before the Tribunal. They take in (1) the evidence taken in by the parties during the domestic inquiry
(2) the evidence taken before the Tribunal.This tribunal in view of the arguments advanced has to give a finding
on the proportionality of the punishment imposed on the claimant. In the case of Muriadih Colliery VS Bihar
Coalliery Kamgar Union (2005) 3 SCC331, The Hon’ble SC have held:-
“it is well-established principle in law that in a given circumstance, it is open for the Industrial
Tribunal acting u/s 11-A of the I D Act 1947 to interfere with the punishment awarded in the domestic
inquiry for good and valid reasons. If the tribunal decides to interfere with such punishment awarded in
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2655
domestic inquiry, it should bear in mind the principle of proportionality between the gravity of the
offence and stringency of the punishment.”
Thus on considering the evidence recorded during the domestic inquiry and adduced before this
Tribunal, the one only conclusion is that the punishment imposed on the claimant for the isolated incident
amounting to mis conduct is disproportionate and harsh, more so when the case of outraging of modesty against
the claimant has ended in acquittal. The imposed punishment has not only occasioned in huge financial los, but
also resulted in mental agony to the claimant. Hence it is felt proper to interfere and modify to a lesser
punishment in exercise of the power conferred u/s 11A of the ID Act. Hence, ordered.
ORDER
The reference be and the same is answered in favour of the claimant. For the finding rendered in the
preceding paragraphs it is held that imposition of the punishment of dismissing him from service for a lone
allegation and in absence of proof that he had earlier indulged in such activities, is illegal and liable to be set
aside. The punishment imposed is thus modified and the management is directed to notionally reinstate him in
service from the date of dismissal since the claimant has already attained the age of superannuation. On such
notional reinstatement two annual increments of the claimant shall be stopped and with cumulative effect and
his financial and retirement benefits shall be released in his favour within two months from the date of
publication of this award, failing which for the extreme old nature of the dispute the accrued amount shall carry
interest at the rate of 7% per annum from the date of accrual and till the actual payment is made. Send a copy of
this award to the appropriate government for notification as required under section 17 of the ID act 1947.
The reference is accordingly answered.
Dictated & Corrected by me.
PRANITA MOHANTY, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर, 2022
का.आ. 1261.—औद्योधगक धववाि अधिधनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में
केन्द्रीय सरकार इधियन ऑयल कॉपोरेशन, नई दिल्ली; 3940, सुनील िलाल धसटयोररटी एजेंसी, नई दिल्ली के
प्रबंधितधत्र के सधबंद्ध धनयोजकों और श्री अधमत कुमार पुत्र श्री रधवन्द्र कुमार ितुवेिी, दिल्ली कमयिारी सधघ, नई दिल्ली
के बंीि अनुबंधि में धनर्ियष्ट औद्योधगक धववाि में केन्रीय सरकार औद्योधगक अधिकरण एवध श्रम न्द्यायालय-2,
नई दिल्ली के पधिाट (सधिभय सध. 172/2020) को प्रकाधशत करती है।
[सं. एल-30011/18/2020-IR(M)]
vk'kh"k dqekj ;kno, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 2nd December, 2022
S.O. 1261.— in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 172/2020) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal/Labour Court-2, New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the
employers in relation to the management of Indian Oil Corporation, New Delhi; 3940, Sunil Dalal Security
Agency, New Delhi and Shri Amit Kumar S/o Shri Ravinder Kumar Chaturvedi, through Delhi Karamchari
Sangh, New Delhi.
[No. L-30011/18/2020-IR(M)]
ASHISH KUMAR YADAV, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL –CUM- LABOUR COURT-II, NEW DELHI
Present: Smt. PRANITA MOHANTY
ID.NO. 172/2020
Shri Amit Kumar S/o Shri Ravinder Kumar Chaturvedi,
Through –Delhi Karamchari Sangh,
W-4, Opposite Kalkaji Bus Depot,
Govindpuri, New Delhi-110019
…. Workman
2656 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Versus
1. Indian Oil Corporation,
Brijwasan, New Delhi-110061.
2. 3940, Sunil Dalal Security Agency,
BM-37, East 2nd Floor, Shalimar Bagh,
New Delhi-110088
…. Managements.
AWARD
1. In the present case, a reference was received from the appropriate Government vide Reference No.L-
30011/18/2020 (IR (M)) dated 20.10.2020 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of
Section 10 of the Act, for adjudication of a dispute, terms of which are as under:
“Whether the services of the workman Sh. Amit Kumar, S/o Shri Ravinder Kumar
Chaturvedi, have been terminated illegally and or unjustifiably and if yes to what relief
is the workman entitled and what directions are necessary in this regard ?”
2.
In the reference order, the appropriate Government commanded the parties raising the dispute to file
statement of claim, complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses with this Tribunal within
15 days of receipt of the reference order and to forward a copy of such statement of claim to the opposite parties
involved in the dispute. Despite directions so given, claimant union opted not to file the claim statement.
3.
On receipt of the above reference, notice was sent to the workman as well as the managements.
Neither the postal article sent to the claimant, referred above, was received back nor was it observed by the
Tribunal that postal services remained unserved in the period, referred above. Therefore, every presumption
lies in favour of the fact that the above notice was served upon the claimant. Despite service of the notice,
claimant opted to abstain away from the proceedings. No claim statement was filed on his behalf. Thus, it is
clear that the workman is not interested in adjudication of the reference on merits.
4.
Since the workman has neither put his appearance nor has he led any evidence so as to prove his cause
against the management, this Tribunal is left with no choice, except to pass a ‘No Dispute/Claim’ award. Let
this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947, for publication.
PRANITA MOHANTY, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर, 2022
का.आ. 1262.—औद्योधगक धववाि अधिधनयम (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय
सरकार एयरपोटय अथॉररटी ऑफ़ इधिया, नई दिल्ली; दिल्ली इधटरनेशनल एयरपोटय प्रा. धलधमटेि, नई दिल्ली और
मैससय बंिी ररटेल प्रा. धलधमटेि, नई दिल्ली के प्रबंधितधत्र के सधबंद्ध धनयोजकों और श्री िधिन पुत्र श्री बंुिन, महासधिव,
हहधिुस्तान इधजीधनयररधग एधि जनरल मजिूर यूधनयन, दिल्ली के बंीि अनुबंधि में धनर्ियष्ट औद्योधगक धववाि में केन्रीय
सरकार औद्योधगक अधिकरण एवध श्रम न्द्यायालय-2, नई दिल्ली के पधिाट (सधिभय सध. 252/2019) को प्रकाधशत
करती है ।
[सं. Z-16025/04/2022-IR(M)]
vk'kh"k dqekj ;kno, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 2nd December, 2022
S.O. 1262.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 252/2019) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal/Labour Court-2, New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the
employers in relation to the management of Airport Authority of India, New Delhi; Delhi International Airport
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2657
Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi and M/s Buddy retail Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi and Shri Chandan S/o Shri Budhan through the
General Secretary, Hindustan Engineering & General Mazdoor Union, Delhi.
[No. Z-16025/04/2022-IR(M)]
ASHISH KUMAR YADAV, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL–CUM-LABOUR COURT-II, NEW DELHI
Present: Smt. Pranita Mohanty
ID.NO.252/2019
Shri Chandan S/o Sh. Budhan,
Through-The General Secretary,
Hindustan Engineering & General Mazdoor Union,
Head Office: D-2/24, Sultanpuri, Delhi-110086
…. Workman
Versus
1. Airport Authority of India,
Rajiv Gandhi Bhawan, Safdarjung Airport, New Delhi-110003.
2. The CEO, Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd.,
New Uddan Bhawan, Terminal -3 IGI Airport, New Delhi-110037.
3. The Managing Director,
M/s Buddy Retail Pvt. Ltd.,
Office No. 08 & 09, Airline Office, IGI Airline Office, IGI Airport,
New Delhi-110037.
…. Managements
AWARD
1.
In the present case, a reference was received from the appropriate Government vide file no. ND.
96(09)2019-ID-FOC-DY-CLC (C) dated 18.11.2019 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of
Section 10 of the Act, for adjudication of a dispute, terms of which are as under:
“Whether the action of the management of M/s Buddy Retail Pvt. Ltd., (contractor of
DAIL) in terminating the services of the workman Sh. Chandan S/o Sh. Budhan w.e.f
11.07.2018 is just, fair and legal? If not what relief the workman concerned is entitled to
and from which date?”
2.
In the reference order, the appropriate Government commanded the parties raising the dispute to file
statement of claim, complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses with this Tribunal within
15 days of receipt of the reference order and to forward a copy of such statement of claim to the opposite parties
involved in the dispute. Despite directions so given, claimant union opted not to file the claim statement.
3.
On receipt of the above reference, notice was sent to the workman as well as the managements.
Neither the postal article sent to the claimant, referred above, was received back nor was it observed by the
Tribunal that postal services remained unserved in the period, referred above. Therefore, every presumption lies
in favour of the fact that the above notice was served upon the claimant. Despite service of the notice, claimant
opted to abstain away from the proceedings. No claim statement was filed on his behalf. Thus, it is clear that
the workman is not interested in adjudication of the reference on merits.
4.
Since the workman has neither put his appearance nor has he led any evidence so as to prove his cause
against the management, this Tribunal is left with no choice, except to pass a ‘No Dispute/Claim’ award. Let
this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947, for publication.
PRANITA MOHANTY, Presiding Officers
2658 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर, 2022
का.आ. 1263.—औद्योधगक धववाि अधिधनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में
केन्द्रीय सरकार ओएनजीसी धलधमटेि, िेहरािून; सीएमएस आईटी सर्वयसेज, गुड़गाधव, हररयाणा के प्रबंधितधत्र के सधबंद्ध
धनयोजकों और श्री ज्योधत वासु, िेहरािून बंीि अनुबंधि में धनर्ियष्ट औद्योधगक धववाि में केन्रीय सरकार औद्योधगक
अधिकरण एवध श्रम न्द्यायालय-2, नई दिल्ली के पधिाट (सधिभय सध. 105/2020) को प्रकाधशत करती है।
[सं. Z-16025/04/2022-IR(M)]
vk'kh"k dqekj ;kno, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 2nd December, 2022
S.O. 1263.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. (105/2020) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal/Labour Court-2, New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the
employers in relation to the management of ONGC Ltd., Dehradun; CMS IT Services, Gurgaon, Haryana and
Shri Jyoti Vasu, Dehradun.
[No. Z-16025/04/2022-IR(M)]
ASHISH KUMAR YADAV, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL –CUM- LABOUR COURT-II, NEW
DELHI
Present: Smt. Pranita Mohanty
ID.NO.105/2020
Sh. Jyoti Vasu,
19 , Sewak Ashram Road,
Dehradun, Uttrakhand -248001
…Workman.
Versus
1. The General Manager (Infocom)IT,
ONGC, Ltd., Old Secretariat Building,
Tel Bhawan,
Dehradun-248003.
2. The Managing Director,
CMS IT Services,
114, 3rd Floor Sector -44
Gurgaon, Haryana-122001
….Managements.
AWARD
1.
In the present case, a reference was received from the appropriate Government vide file
no. D-821/A/2020/02/IRDDN DY. CLC (C) Dehradun, dated 27.02.2020, under clause (d) of sub-section (1)
and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Act, for adjudication of a dispute, terms of which are as under:
“Whether the act of terminating the services of Shri Jyoti Vasu, engaged as Senior
Customer Support Engineer in the Estb. Of M/s ONGC Ltd., Dehradun through M/s
CMS IT Services, Gurgaon is legal and justified?
Whether the said employee is entitled for regularization/ reinstatement of his service
in the said Estb.? If not, what relief /remedies, the concerned employee is entitled to?”
2.
In the reference order, the appropriate Government commanded the parties raising the dispute to file
statement of claim, complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses with this Tribunal within
15 days of receipt of the reference order and to forward a copy of such statement of claim to the opposite parties
involved in the dispute. Despite directions so given, claimant union opted not to file the claim statement.
3.
On receipt of the above reference, notice was sent to the workman as well as the managements.
Neither the postal article sent to the claimant, referred above, was received back nor was it observed by the
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2659
Tribunal that postal services remained unserved in the period, referred above. Therefore, every presumption
lies in favour of the fact that the above notice was served upon the claimant. Despite service of the notice,
claimant opted to abstain away from the proceedings. No claim statement was filed on his behalf. Thus, it is
clear that the workman is not interested in adjudication of the reference on merits.
4.
Since the workman has neither put his appearance nor has he led any evidence so as to prove his cause
against the management, this Tribunal is left with no choice, except to pass a ‘No Dispute/Claim’ award. Let
this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947, for publication.
PRANITA MOHANTY, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर, 2022
का.आ. 1264.—औद्योधगक धववाि अधिधनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में
केन्द्रीय सरकार सीएमएस, ओएनजीसी हॉधस्पटल, िेहरािून; ऑयल एधि नेिुरल गैस, िेहरािून के प्रबंधितधत्र के सधबंद्ध
धनयोजकों और श्री गोहवधि हसधह धबंष्ट, राज्य सधिव, भारतीय मजिूर सधघ, िेहरािून बंीि अनुबंधि में धनर्ियष्ट औद्योधगक
धववाि में केन्रीय सरकार औद्योधगक अधिकरण एवध श्रम न्द्यायालय-2, नई दिल्ली के पधिाट (सधिभय सध. 116/2015)
को प्रकाधशत करती है।
[सं. एल-30011/15/2015-IR(M)]
vk'kh"k dqekj ;kno, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 2nd December, 2022
S.O. 1264.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 116/2015) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal/Labour Court-2, New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the
employers in relation to the management of CMS, ONGC Hospital, Dehradun; Oil and Natural Gas Ltd,
Dehradun and Shri Govind Singh Bisht through State Secretary, Bhartiya Mazdoor Sangh, Dehradun.
[No. L-30011/15/2015-IR(M)]
ASHISH KUMAR YADAV, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II, NEW DELHI.
Present:
Smt. Pranita Mohanty,
Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-Cum-Labour
Court-II, New Delhi.
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 116/2015
Date of Passing Award- 03.11.2022
BETWEEN:
Shri Govind Singh Bisht,
Through:-
State Secretary,
Bhartiya Mazdoor Sangh,
16-A, Rajpur Road,
Dehradun
…. Workman
Versus
1. The General Manager,
CMS, ONGC Hospital,
Dehradun 248001
Dehradun.
2660 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2. The Executive Director,
Oil and Natural Gas Ltd. Tel Bhawan,
Dehradun
….. Management
Appearances:-
Shri M C Panth …For the claimant
(A/R)
Shri V K Chopra … For the Management
(A/R)
AWARD
The Government of India in Ministry of Labour & Employment has referred the present
dispute existing between employer i.e. the management of CMS, ONGC Hospital, and its
workman/claimant herein, under clause (d) of sub section (1)and sub section (2A) of section 10 of the
Industrial Dispute Act 1947 vide letter No. L-30011/15/2015 (IR(M) dated 08/06/2015 to this tribunal
for adjudication to the following effect.
“Whether the demand of workers (Annexure I & II enclosed) regarding
permanent status in the ONGC Hospital who are working since 1996 is justified?
IF yes, then what relief the worker will get? ”
As stated in the claim petition, the 41 claimants whose details has been stated in the claim petition and
represented by the state secretary, Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh were employed as Para medical staff on
contractual basis in the hospital run and managed by ONGC. Their initial appointment varies between 1996 to
2012 and some of them have worked for 18 years continuously. The nature of work discharged by them is
perennial and the posts in which they have been working are permanent in nature. The ONGC a Nabaratna
Govt. owned company, instead of being a model employer has acted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of
the claimants and the claimants have been appointed on contractual basis against permanent vacancies and their
contract of appointment is being renewed from time to time for fixed terms, which amounts to unfair labour
practice. The claimants have further stated that the management ONGC at the time of their initial appointment
had requisitioned the names of eligible candidates through the employment exchange. The candidates who were
sponsored by the employment exchange were to appear the test as prescribed by the employer and on being
successful, were given appointment. In the year 2012, the management again asked those contractual Para
medical employees to appear. In the test conducted before renewal of their contract. Though as per the model
Industrial standing order, the contractual employees are entitled to be regularized against the vacancy regular
posts, the management in the year 2014 made open advertisement for filling up the permanent vacancies of Para
medical staff. Being aggrieved, the claimants approached the Hon’ble High Court of Uttarakhand by filing writ
petition no 1053/2014 and challenged the advertisement dated 20.07.2014. The Hon’ble High Court of
Uttarakhand by interim order dated 24.07.2014 allowed the management to conduct the examination, but
restrained the publication of the result till disposal of the writ petition. Thus the management took up a
discussion with the claimants as agreed the service of the claimants were extended up to June 2016 and the
advertisement dated 20.07.2014, was withdrawn. The claimants were assured of a scheme to be brought shortly
for their regularization. With such assurance the claimants also withdrew the Writ petition filed before the High
Court of Uttarakhand. On such amicable arrangement, the management also extended the benefits of
contributory provident fund to the claimants, a benefit granted to the regular employees. Thus the workers were
under the bonafide belief that their service will be regularized in ONGC. But no step in that regard was taken
by the management. While the matter stood thus, The Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh moved an application before
the central labour commissioner Derhadun, alleging that for the perennial nature of work discharged by the
paramedical staff, contractual appointment of workers is not permissible under law. Equal pay at par with the
permanent paramedical employees was also demanded along with other demands. The Labour Commissioner
gave notice to the management and took steps for conciliation. At that point, the management appeared and at
the time of conciliation took the stand that the claimants being appointed on fixed term contractual basis can not
demand regularization. Since the conciliation failed, the appropriate Govt. referred the matter to this Tribunal
for adjudication on the legality of the demand made by the workmen for permanent status as employees of the
management ONGC. It has also been pleaded that the management during the pendency of the Industrial
Dispute is trying to recruit regular employees against the vacancies they are working.
Being noticed the management ONGC appeared and filed written statement refuting the stand taken by
the claimants. It has been pleaded that ONGC is a public sector undertaking having it’s own Rules governing
the procedure of Recruitment and service condition of the employees. Thus the Industrial Standing Order does
not have the applicability for the management. The petitioners have been working for the ONGC for the period
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2661
ranging from 2 to 8 years and not since 18 years as claimed by the claimants. Only 4 of the claimants are
working since 18 years. (List of such persons enclosed with the WS) requirement of permanent and temporary
staff in the Hospital of ONGC varies depending upon the workload, so also the requirement of Para medics. The
no of requirement of Para medics in ONGC Hospital is assessed in an interval of two years by the Human
Resource Group (HRG), Derhadun. As per that assessment, the required no of posts for paramedics are
sanctioned and advertisements are made in the News Papers inviting applications from the eligible candidates
having eligible qualification. The claimants are working in the Hospital of ONGC for some time and they were
engaged against an advertisement in which the nature of employment was specifically described as on fixed
term contractual basis. The candidates having knowledge of the terms of employment and being desirous to
serve as such, had applied andparticipated in the written and viva voce test and being selected, had joined in
their respective posts.This procedure was adopted each time their period of contract was extended.it has also
been pleaded that if the applicability of Model Standing order is accepted for the shake of argument, the said
Model Standing Order recognizes the concept of fixed term employment, but does not provide for absorbing the
fixed term employees as permanent employees. Thus the claim of the claimants, who are fixed term employees
to be absorbed as permanent employees is not permissible under law. Their employment is governed by the
terms specified in the contract and they have no vested right on the permanent Para medical posts advertised
now. The validity of the contract of different category of paramedics was for two years i.e up to 30th June 2014.
But the same has been extended up to 30.06.2016, as the claimants had approached the Hon’ble High Court of
Uttarakhand and the court passed an interim order directing conduct of the exam for regular Para medical staff,
but put a restraint on declaration of the result. In the mean time the claimants sat in a dharna in front of ONGC
and also filed an application before the Asst Labour Commissioner Dheradun. During the conciliation as
advised by the ALC, it was decided not to discontinue the services of the claimants till the Hon’ble H C of
Uttarakhand decides the writ petition filed by the claimants on merit. But no assurance was ever given to the
claimants about framing of a scheme to regularize their service. These Para medics were initially appointed
after notification of vacancies through employment exchange followed by written and viva voice test. Before
expiry of their fixed term employment advertisement was made for fresh short term contractual employment.
The claimants had applied, appeared in the tests conducted and being found successful were appointed. These
claimants are not the contract labours nor employed through any contractor. Their claim in respect of the regular
posts advertised in the year 2014 is illegal and not maintainable. It has also been pleaded that the appropriate
Govt. has referred the matter to adjudicate on the claim of the workmen working since 1996. Hence the case of
the claimants who were engaged after 1996, can not be adjudicated. With such assertion, the management has
pleaded for dismissal of the claim.
The claimants filed replication denying the stand of the management and reiterating the stand
taken in the claim petition. It has been explained that the claim for regularization is in respect of the regular
vacancies, now advertised. Considering their long period of service as contractual employees and that they
posses the requisite qualification and were selected through a proper selection process, the management should
regularize their service instead of making fresh advertisement and this action of the management amounts to
unfair labour practice. The claimants in their replication have admitted the fact that all the claimants were not
engaged in the year 1996 and their years of appointment varies. But the stand of the management that the
reference is in respect of the persons employed in the year 1996 only.
On these rival pleadings the following issues were framed by order dated 21.12.2019.
ISSUES
1-
If the proceeding is maintainable
2-
If the action of ONGC in not making the workmen permanent, though appointed against
permanent vacancy amounts unfair labour practice.
3-
Whether the demand of the workmen for absorption against permanent vacancies is justified.
4-
Whether the workmen are entitled to all the service benefits as claimed by them.
5-
To what other relief the parties are entitled to.
The claimants filed their individual affidavits to be read as evidence and altogether 32 affidavits were
filed. They were examined as WW/1 to WW/32. All the witnesses examined produced and exhibited their
appointment letters and certificates in support of their educational qualification.
But on the date fixed for cross examination of the witnesses examined on behalf of the claimants, none
appeared on behalf of the management and as such the cross examination was marked as nil. The evidence
adduced by the claimants thus stood un rebutted and unchallenged. The management, whencalled upon to
adduce evidence choose not to adduce any oral or documentary evidence.
2662 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
It is necessary to mention here that during the pendency of this dispute, the claimants moved
an application for grant of pay scale at par with the regular Para medical employees and this Tribunal by order
dated 29.11.2018, allowed the said petition and directed the management ONGC to pay remuneration and
additional emoluments at par with the regular employees discharging similar nature of work, from the
succeeding month of the order. The management filed an application for recall of the said order. But this
Tribunal by order dated 24.05.2019, rejected the said application. Being aggrieved the Management moved the
Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in WPC No 8597/2019. The Hon’ble High court while upholding the order of this
Tribunal on the prayer for interim relief disposed off the said writ application.
At the outset of the elaborate argument advanced on behalf of the management attention of
the Tribunal was drawn to the constitution bench judgment of the Hon’ble SC in the case of Secretary, State
of Karnatak vs. Uma Devi, to emphasize that the prayer for regularization of the contractual employees if
would be allowed, the same would amount to back door entry and opposed to the policy of public employment
and right guaranteed under the constitution. Reliance has also been placed on several other judicial
pronouncements to support the argument that when the claimants having knowledge that their appointment is on
fixed term contractual basis had accepted the offer of appointment their claim for regularization is not tenable in
law. The counter argument of the claimants is that the principle decided in the case of Uma Devi referred supra
has no applicability to labour law and Industrial Dispute , where the issue is about unfair labour practice.. He
placed reliance in the case of Narendra ku Tiwari vs. State of Jharkhand, in which the Hon’ble SC while
examining the law declared in the case of Uma Devi, observed that the purpose and intent of the decision in
Umadevi was twofold, namely, to prevent irregular and illegal appointment in future and secondly to confer a
benefit on those irregularly appointed in the past. With this he submitted that the undisputed and unrebutted
evidence adduced by the claimants prove how they have been made victim of the fixed term contractual
employment for years and denial of regularization amounts to unfair labour practice for which the relief as
prayed should be granted.
FINDINGS
ISSUE No1
The management /Respondent in the written statement filed has challenged the maintainability of this
proceeding on the ground that the reference is to adjudicate upon the legality and justification of the demand for
conferment of the status of permanent employees to the claimants working in ONGC since 1996. Hence the
claimants engaged after 1996 have no right to claim the said status. The learned counsel for the management
forcefully argued that the Tribunal can not Travel beyond the reference made by the appropriate Govt. and the
adjudication shall be confined to the claim of those claimants only who started working in the year 1996. He
pointed out to Para 8 and 10 of the WS where in the no of paramedics engaged in different years and the names
of the persons engaged after 1996 has been shown. Basing on that he argued that the engagement of fixed term
contractual Para medics depend upon the work load of the Hospital. At an interval of two years the HRG,
Derhadun, makes assessment of the work load and recommends the no of paramedics required, which is
forwarded to the higher Management for approval and with such approval advertisement is made for
engagement of fixed term paramedics. Thus the no varies from tenure to tenure. He emphasized that the
Tribunal for the specific reference made should consider the claim of the persons engaged in 1996 only.
Be it stated that the claim has been filed by 41 claimants and in the claim petition in Para 10, the name,
DOB, date of joining, the post in which they are working and their qualification has been clearly mentioned. It
is true that the date of initial engagement of the claimants vary from 1996 to 2013. It is also an admitted
position that all the claimants are continuing to work in the Hospital of ONGC. The management in this
proceeding has not adduced any oral or documentary evidence. In Para 8 the no of Para medics engaged in
different years has been indicated and the same does not match with the no of the claimants who are still
working. Moreover, in para10 of the WS there is a mention of only six Para medics and against the name of
three only who are at serial no 20,33and 37 of the claim petition, the date of joining has been indicated. The
respondent being in possession of all the documents relating to the engagement of the claimants could have
produced documents in support of the stand taken in the WS. In absence of proof to the contrary, the evidence
adduced by the claimants and the statement in the claim petition with regard to the initial date of engagement of
the claimants is accepted.
The reference received from the appropriate Govt. reads as follows.
“Whether the demand of workers (Annexure I&II enclosed) regarding permanent status in the ONGC Hospital,
who are working since 1996 is justified? If yes, what relief the workmen will get?”
The management has taken a stand that the adjudication should be confined to three of the workmen
only who were engaged in the year 1996. This stand taken by the management does not sound convincing since
the reference has been made with reference to the claimants mentioned in Annexure I& II, which are nothing
but the letters dated 13.06.2014 and 27.05.2014 submitted by Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh before the ALC
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2663
containing the names of the claimants forwarded by the ALC to the Govt., which in turn has been forwarded to
this Tribunal for adjudication. Hence, it is held that the reference has been received for adjudication of the
dispute in respect of all the claimants described in the Annexure to the reference as well as in the claim petition.
This issue is thus answered in favor of the claimants.
ISSUE No 2&3
These two issues being interdependent are taken up for consideration together. Admitted position with
regard to the claim of the workmen is that these workmen were engaged in the post of Para medics in the
Hospital run by ONGC on different dates as mentioned in the annexure received along with the reference and as
stated in the claim petition. Both the parties have pleaded that their engagement is on contractual basis and for a
fixed term on consolidated remuneration.it is also admitted that the contract has been renewed from time to time
pursuant to advertisements published and selection through a process decided by the management. The
claimants have described their qualification in the claim petition and while testifying as witnesses have
produced documentary proof in support of their qualification, which has not been disputed by the management.
The oral and documentary evidence adduced by the claimants thus proves that the claimants having requisite
qualification had offered their candidature for the posts advertised and the management after testing their
eligibility and suitability in their own way selected and appointed them against the posts held by them. The
claimants have filed their appointment letter and the letter correspondence extending their engagement. The
management, in the WS has clearly stated that these claimants were selected through a written as well as a viva
voice test conducted by the management. The evidence, in this regard, as adduced by the claimants stand
unchallenged as the witnesses were not cross examined and no rebuttal evidence was adduced by the
management.
The claimants have pleaded that they are working against the permanent posts since the date of their
initial appointment and the nature of work discharged by them is perennial in nature. For that reason the
management is making advertisement for the posts on intervals and re appointing these claimants again and
again as contractual employees only with the intension of depriving them of regular status. As stated in the
preceding paragraph, the management has admitted the said contractual appointment, but with an explanation
that the claimants are working against the temporary vacancies as determined by the HRG, on assessment of the
work load. These posts are distinguishable from the permanent posts of paramedics. But no evidence with
regard to the assessment and recommendation made by HRG has been placed on record. The learned counsel
for the management only advanced oral argument in this regard. On the contrary, the documents filed by the
claimant which are the appointment letters and extension letters of engagement shows that the management is in
constant need of the service of these Para medics for which they have been granted extension. It is also not
disputed that when the management in the year 2014, made advertisement for regular posts the claimants
through their union had approached the Hon’ble High Court of Uttarakhand in writ petition no 1053/2014,
where an interim order was passed restraining publication of the result of the recruitment test held for the
permanent vacancies. It is also admitted by both the parties in their pleading that a talk of compromise was held
and pursuant thereto, the claimants were granted extension of engagement and the WPC filed by the claimants
was withdrawn. The claimants have stated that the benefit of CPF as given to the regular employees was
granted to them. Though the management has denied this stand of the claimants in the WS, no rebuttal evidence
has been adduced. Before the Hon’ble High Court of Nainital, the management also admitted that the posts
advertised have nothing to do with the posts held by the claimants. This clearly shows that the management
is/was having vacancies in the post of paramedics when the claimants are working on contractual basis.
The one and only argument advanced by the management is that the claimants had accepted the offer
and joined in the posts knowing fully well that their appointment is contractual and for a fixed term. Thus their
present claim for permanent status is nothing but an attempt for a back door entry. ONGC is a public sector
undertaking, having it’s own Rule and Procedure of Recruitment. The relief prayed by the claimants, if would
be granted, the same shall stand opposed to the policy of public employment. He further submitted that the
advertisement made in the year 2014 was with drawn. But the fresh advertisement was made in the year 2018
and the recruitment process is over by joining of the recruited persons. Thus the ONGC has no vacancy at
present. The learned counsel made argument solely relying upon the judgment of the Constitution Bench of the
Hon’ble S C in the case of Umadevi, referred supra.
In his reply the learned AR for the claimants argued that the law laid down in the case of Umadevi has
been wrongly interpreted. In that case the Hon’ble SC have disapproved the practice of regularizing the service
of the persons appointed illegally and without following the due procedure. Such appointments have been held
as back door entries. But in this case, the claimants were appointed pursuant to advertisement made. They were
short listed for having requisite qualification. Not only that, they had to appear in the written as well as in the
viva voce test to prove their competency for the post and this has been admitted by the Respondent in the WS
and in the written reply filed before the labour commissioner. The claimants, who testified as WW1to WW31
have proved their certificates of qualification and the same proves that the claimants posses the qualification for
the post held by them and for that reason, their tenure of engagement were extended from time to time. This
2664 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
documentary evidence has not been disputed or rebutted by the management. Reliance has been placed by the
claimants in the case of Sachin Ambadas Dawale vs. State of Maharastra (Writ Petition No 2046/2010)
decided by the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay, where in the Hon’ble court have held in the following
manner.
“it could be clearly seen that the issue before the SC in the case of Secretary, State of Karnatak vs.
Umadevi, was pertaining to the appointments which were made clandenstinely, without following the selection
process. The facts of the present case is are totally different. In the present case the petitioners were appointed
after the posts were advertised, they were selected in a selection process by a committee of experts duly
constituted as per the Govt. Resolution. In that view of the matter, the law laid down in the case of Uma Devi,
would not be applicable to the facts of the present case. ********it being an admitted position that the posts in
which these employees have been appointed and continued for a considerable length of time, on contractual
basis, which are regular and full time posts, the appointment in these posts can not be at the whim and fancies
of the Govt. of Maharastra. The state can not adopt the policy of hire and fire or use and throw.”
On the basis of the said judgment the claimants argue that the law decided in the case of Umadevi is
not applicable to the admitted facts of this case and the tribunal should consider the long and continuous service
rendered by them for granting the relief prayed.
It is admitted that the claimants, pursuant to the advertisement were appointed being found qualified
and suitable in the selection process. The work discharged by them is of perennial nature which is evident from
the fact that there tenure is being extended from time to time. The posts held by them is separate and
distinguishable from the posts Para medics filled up by the advertisement made in the year 2018, though the
duty and work done by them are similar. But the management has made them to work as contractual employees
for years together and for a prolonged period, even though they posses requisite qualification and experience
and there are vacancies. This act of the management amounts to unfair labour practice as defined under the ID
Act. In the case of Maharastra Road Transport Corporation vs. Casteribe Rajya Parivahan Karmachari
Sanghatana, SCC,573, the Hon’ble SC have held that
“the power given to the Industrial courts u/s 30 is very wide and affirmative action mentioned there in
is inclusive and not exhaustive. Employing Badlis, casuals or Temporaries and to continue them as such for
years together , with the object of depriving them of the status and previledge of permanent employees is an
unfair labour practice and the Industrial and Labour Courts are empowered to issue preventive as well as
positive directions to an erring employer.”
The present industrial dispute is identical on facts with the case of Maharashtra Road Transport
referred supra.
Again, the Hon’ble Supreme Court in another case Hari Nandan Prasad vs. employer I/R to
management of Food Corporation of India and another reported in AIR 2014 SC 1848, wherein the issue
was as to whether the Labour Court Tribunal has the jurisdiction to order regularization of the workman was
considered in the context of the provision of the Act and the decision of the constitution bench in the case of
Uma Devi and the Hon’ble Court came to hold that the powers conferred upon the Industrial Tribunal/Labour
Court under the ID Act are quite wide. The Act deals with industrial Disputes, provides for conciliation,
adjudication, and settlements, and regulates the rights of the parties and the enforcement of the award and
settlement. Not only that way back in the year 1950 in the case of Bharat Bank Limited vs. Employees of
Bharat Bank reported in (1950) LLJ 921 The Hon’ble Supreme Court had observed:“In settling the
disputes between the employers and the workmen, the function of the Tribunal is not confined to administration
of justice in accordance with law. It can confer rights and privileges on either party which it considers
reasonable and proper, though they may not be within the terms of any existing agreement. It has not merely to
interpret or give effect to the contractual rights and obligations of the parties. It can create new rights and
obligations between them which it considers essential for keeping industrial peace.” Thus keeping the
pronouncements made by the Apex court in the aforesaid cases in view, it is held that the management of
ONGC has adopted unfair labour practice by allowing the claimants to work continuously for years together as
contractual employees even though the work and duty discharged by them was of perennial nature and the
management has vacancies as it is admitted that the posts filled up by advertisement made in the year 2018 has
nothing to do with the posts in which the claimants are working. The claimants claim for regularization is held
justifiable and they are entitled to the status of permanent employees of ONGC. The ONGC, a public sector
undertaking and one of the Navaratna companies, instead of being a model employer has conducted it self in
manner prejudicial to the claimants giving service in the Hospitals of ONGC for years together. These two
issues are accordingly decided in favour of the claimants.
ISSUE No 4 and 5
In view of the decision and finding arrived in deciding issue no 2 and 3, it is concluded that the
claimants are also entitled to all the service benefits granted to the regular and permanent Para medics including
salary and other service benefits attached to the post from the date they completed one year of service from the
date of their first appointment in ONGC. This benefit will be applicable to the 31 claimants who testified in this
proceeding and proved by oral and documentary evidence, their respective qualification and continuity of
[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : दिसम्बर 3, 2022/अग्रिायण 12, 1944
2665
service, since eligibility is sine qua non for the claim of regularization. Both the issues are accordingly decided
in favour of the claimants. Hence, ordered.
ORDER
The reference be and the same is answered in favour of the claimants as per the list enclosed. The
claim advanced for regularization of their service and conferment of permanent status as employees of ONGC is
held justified. It is directed that the claimants as per the list enclosed with this award shall be treated as
permanent employees of ONGC w. e. f. the date they completed one year of service from the date of their
respective initial appointments and shall be paid the pay and other service benefits at par with the permanent
and regular Para medics appointed by ONGC, from that date. The pay of the claimants shall be revised and the
arrear pay and other financial benefits as admissible and had accrued shall be paid to them within two months
from the date of publication of this award without interest failing which the amount payable to the individual
claimant shall carry interest @ 6% per annum from the date of accrual and till the final payment is made. The
management is directed to pay Rs 50,000/- to each of the claimants towards litigation expenses within the time
stipulated above failing which the said amount shall carry interest @6% from the date of publication of the
award and till the payment is made. Send a copy of this award to the appropriate government for notification as
required under section 17 of the ID act 1947.
The reference is accordingly answered.
Dictated & Corrected by me.
PRANITA MOHANTY, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 2 दिसम्बर, 2022
का.आ. 1265.—औद्योधगक धववाि अधिधनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में
केन्द्रीय सरकार मेससय ओम कधस्रटशन; मैससय भारत पेरोधलयम कॉपोरेशन धलधमटेि के प्रबंधितधत्र के सधबंद्ध धनयोजकों
और उनके कमयिारी के बंीि अनुबंधि में धनर्ियष्ट औद्योधगक धववाि में केन्रीय सरकार औद्योधगक अधिकरण एवध श्रम
न्द्यायालय-1, मुधबंई के पधिाट (सधिभय सध. 1/01 of 2019) को प्रकाधशत करती है।
[सं. एल-30011/17/2018-IR(M)]
vk'kh"k dqekj ;kno, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 2nd December, 2022
S.O. 1265.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. (1/01 of 2019) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal/Labour Court-1, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the
employers in relation to the management of M/s Om Construction; M/s Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and
their Workmen.
[No. L-30011/17/2018-IR(M)]
ASHISH KUMAR YADAV, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1 MUMBAI
Present: Smt. Pranita Mohanty Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO.CGIT-1/01 OF 2019
Parties:
Employers in relation to the management of
1. M/s. Om Constructin
2. M/s.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd
And
Their workmen
Appearances:
For the first party Management No.1
:
Absent.
2666 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 3, 2022/ AGRAHAYANA 12, 1944
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
For the first party Management No.2
:
Absent.
For the second party workman
:
Absent.
State
:
Maharashtra
Mumbai, dated the 08th day of September, 2022
AWARD
1. The present reference has been made by the Central Government by its order dated 30.11.2018
passed in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The terms of reference as per the schedule to the
said order are as under:
“Whether the demand of Petroleum Employees Union, Mumbai for reinstatement of
9i) Shri Bechan Prasad Gaud, (ii) Shri Hiralal Chaurasiya and (iii) Shri Gunaji
Sonawane, all Handling Workers at BPCL LPG Bottling Plant Mumbai, by M/s. Om
Construction Contractor under the management of BPCL Mumbai Refinery, Mahul,
or for suitable compensation is just and proper? If so, what relief the workmen
concerned are entitled to? ”
(1) By the order dated 25.1.2019, notices were directed to be issued to the parties. Accordingly, notices were
issued to the parties by Registered Post AD.
(2) Notices issued to the first party / Management No.1 and First Party Management No.2 were duly served
and acknowledgement cards were received back. Registered envelope and acknowledgement card has not
been received back for the notice sent to the second party / Union.
(3) Perusal of the record reveals that learned counsel for the first party management no.2 has appeared before
this Tribunal only on three occasions i.e on 07.6.2019, 30.01.2020 and on 01.4.2022. The second party
union did not appeared before this Tribunal to file the statement of claim inspite of repeated adjournments
for the last 3 years.
(4) The case is taken up today. None is present for the first party management and none is present for the
second party union.
(5) No Statement of Claim has been filed on behalf of the second party / Union.
(6) From the above narration of facts, it is evident that despite repeated dates having been fixed, none has
appeared on behalf of the first party management and second party/Union. No Statement of Claim has
been filed on behalf of the second party / Union. There is thus, no pleading or evidence filed on behalf of
the second party / Union in support of its claim as contained in the Reference made to this Tribunal. No
relief, therefore, can be granted to the second party / Union.
(7) Reference is consequently answered by stating that no relief can be granted to the second party / Union.
(8) Award is passed accordingly.
PRANITA MOHANTY, Presiding Officer
Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064
and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.
MANOJ KUMAR
VERMA
Digitally signed by MANOJ KUMAR
VERMA
Date: 2022.12.19 14:37:16 +05'30'