8467 GI/2022

(3081)

रजिस्ट्री सं. डी.एल. (एन) 04/0007/2003—05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

xxxGIDHxxx

xxxGIDExxx

प्राजिकार से प्रकाजित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप् ताजिक

WEEKLY

सं. 52]

नई दिल् ली, दिसम्बर 25—दिसम्बर 31, 2022, िजनवार/ पौष 4—पौष 10, 1944

No. 52]

NEW DELHI, DECEMBER 25—DECEMBER 31, 2022, SATURDAY/ PAUSHA 4— PAUSHA 10, 1944

इस भाग में जभन् न पष्‍ सं्‍ ा िी िाती िज जिससे दक ि पष क संकलन के प प में र ा िा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II— ण् ड 3—उप- ण् ड (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्राल ों (रक्षा मंत्राल को छोड़कर) द्वारा िारी दकए गए सांजवजिक आिेि और अजिसूचनाएं

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

जवत्त मंत्राल

(रािस्ट्व जवभाग)

(केन्री अप्रत् क्ष कर एवं सीमा िुल्क बोडड)

नई दिल् ली, 27 दिसम् बर, 2022

का. आ. 1398.—केन्र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकी प्र ोिनों के जलए प्र ोग) जन म, 1976 के

जन म 10 के उप-जन म (4) के अनुसरण में रािस्ट्व जवभाग के अिीन, जनम्नजलज त का ाडल ों जिनके 80 प्रजतित से

अजिक कमडचारर ों ने जिन्िी का का ड सािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जल ा िज, को अजिसूजचत करती िज:

1. का ाडल आ ुक्त, केन्री वस्ट्तु एवं सेवा कर (अपील्स) आ ुक्ताल , िोिपुर, िी-105 न् ू िोिपुर

औद्योजगक क्षेत्र, िोिपुर-342003

2. केन्री वस्ट्तु एवं सेवा कर ले ापरीक्षा आ ुक्ताल (मु्‍ ाल ), कानपुर, 117/7, सवोि नगर कानपुर

3. केन्री वस्ट्तु एवं सेवा कर ले ापरीक्षा सर्कडल, कानपुर-1

4. केन्री वस्ट्तु एवं सेवा कर ले ापरीक्षा सर्कडल, कानपुर-2

सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-13012023-241928

CG-DL-W-13012023-241928

3082 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 31, 2022/ PAUSHA 10, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

5. केन्री वस्ट्तु एवं सेवा कर ले ापरीक्षा सर्कडल, इलािाबाि

6. केन्री वस्ट्तु एवं सेवा कर ले ापरीक्षा सर्कडल, वाराणसी

7. केन्री वस्ट्तु एवं सेवा कर ले ापरीक्षा सर्कडल, गोर पुर

8. केन्री वस्ट्तु एवं सेवा कर ले ापरीक्षा सर्कडल, मु्‍ ाल , कानपुर

9. का ाडल , उप आ ुक्त, केन्री वस्ट्तु एवं सेवा कर, मंडल भावनगर-3

[फा. सं. ई-11017/3/2017- जिन्िी-2 डीओआर]

नीिाररका ससंि, जनिेिक (रािभाषा)

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Revenue)

(CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS)

New Delhi, the 27th December, 2022

S.O. 1398.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official

Purpose of the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies, the following offices under

Department of revenue where more than 80% staff has acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:

1. Office of the Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax (Appeals) Commissionerate, Jodhpur,

G-105 New Jodhpur Industrial Area, Jodhpur-342003

2. Central Goods and Service Tax Audit Commissionerate (HQ), Kanpur, 117/7, Sarvodaya Nagar

Kanpur.

3. Central Goods and Service Tax Audit Circle, Kanpur-1

4. Central Goods and Service Tax Audit Circle, Kanpur-2

5. Central Goods and Service Tax Audit Circle, Allahabad

6. Central Goods and Service Tax Audit Circle, Varanasi

7. Central Goods and Service Tax Audit Circle, Gorakhpur

8. Central Goods and Service Tax Audit Circle, Headquarters, Kanpur

9. Office of the Deputy Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax, Circle Bhavnagar-3

[F. No E-11017/3/2017- Hindi-2 DOR]

NIHARIKA SINGH, Director (OL)

को ला मंत्राल

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर, 2022

का. आ. 1399.—को ला िारक क्षेत्र (अिडन और जवकास) अजिजन म, 1957 (1957 का 20) (जिसे इसमें

इसके पश्चात् उक्त अजिजन म किा ग ा िज) की िारा 9 की उप-िारा (1) के अिीन िारी की गई भारत सरकार के

को ला मंत्राल की अजिसूचना सं्‍ ांक का.आ. 965, तारी 13 अक्तूबर, 2022, िो भारत के रािपत्र, भाग II,

ण्ड 3, उप- ण्ड (ii), तारी 15 अक्तूबर, 2022 में प्रकाजित की गई ी, उक्त अजिसूचना से (जिसे इसमें इसके

पश्चात् उक्त भूजम किा ग ा िज) संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णडत भूजम और ऐसी भूजम में ा उस पर के सभी अजिकार, उक्त

अजिजन म की िारा 10 की उप-िारा (1) के अिीन, सभी जवल्लगंमों से मुक्त िोकर, आत् ंजतक प प से केन्री

सरकार में जनजित िो गए िैं ;

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम्बर 31, 2022/पौष 10, 1944

3083

और केन्री सरकार का ि समािान िो ग ा िज दक वेस्ट्टनड कोलफील््स जलजमटेड, जिला नागपुर, मिाराष्ट्र

(जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् सरकारी कंपनी किा ग ा िज), ऐसे जनबंिनों और ितों का जिन्िें केन्री सरकार इस

जनजमत्त अजिरोजपत करना उजचत समझे, अनुपालन करने के जलए इच्छुक िज;

अतः, अब, केन्री सरकार, उक्त अजिजन म की िारा 11 की उप-िारा (1) द्वारा प्रित्त िजक्त ों का प्र ोग

करते हुए, ि जनिेि िेती िज दक 224.24 िेक्टे र (लगभग) अ वा 554.10 एकड़ (लगभग) माप वाली उक्त भूजम

और इस प्रकार जनजित उक्त भूजम में ा उस पर के सभी अजिकार तारी 15 अक्तूबर, 2022 से केन्री सरकार में

इस प्रकार जनजित बने रिने के बिाए, जनम्नजलज त जनबन्िनों और ितों के अिीन रिते हुए सरकारी कंपनी में जनजित

िो िाएंगे,

अ ाडत: -

(1) सरकारी कंपनी, उक्त अजिजन म के उपबंिों के अिीन और अन् सुसंगत जवजि ों के अिीन ा अविाररत

प्रजतकर, ब् ाि, नुकसाजन ों, इत् ादि, और वजसी िी मिों की बाबत सभी संिा करेगी;

(2) संिे रकमों का अविारण करने के प्र ोिनों के जलए उक्त अजिजन म की िारा 14 के अिीन एक अजिकरण

का ग न दक ा िाएगा, सरकारी कंपनी द्वारा ितड (1) के अिीन और ऐसे दकसी अजिकरण और उक्त अजिकरण

की सिा ता करने के जलए जन ुक्त व्यजक्त ों के संबंि में उपगत सभी व्य , उक्त सरकारी कंपनी द्वारा विन

दकए िाएंगे और इसी प्रकार जनजित उक्त भूजम में ा उस पर के अजिकारों के जलए ा उनके संबंि में अपील,

आदि सभी जवजिक का डवाजि ों की बाबत उपगत, सभी व्य भी, सरकारी कंपनी द्वारा विन दकए िाएंगे;

(3) सरकारी कंपनी, केन्री सरकार ा उसके पििारर ों की, ऐसे दकसी अन् व्य के संबंि में क्षजतपूर्तड करेगी िो

इस प्रकार जनजित उक्त भूजम में ा उस पर के अजिकारों के बारे में केन्री सरकार ा उसके पििारर ों द्वारा

ा उनके जवरुद्ध दकन्िी का डवाजि ों के संबंि में आवश् क िो;

(4) सरकारी कंपनी के पास उक्त भूजम में इस प्रकार जनजित अजिकारों को केन्री सरकार के पूवड अनुमोिन के

जबना, दकसी अन् व्यजक्त को अंतररत करने की िजक्त निीं िोगी; और

(5) सरकारी कंपनी, ऐसे जनिेिों और ितों का पालन करेगी, िो केन्री सरकार द्वारा िब कभी आवश् क िो,

उक्त भूजम के जवजिष्ट क्षेत्रों के जलए दि े िाएं ा अजिरोजपत दकए िाएं।

[फा. सं. 43015/18/2019-एलएएण्डआईआर]

राम जिरोमजण सरोि, जनिेिक

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi, the 30th December, 2022

S.O. 1399.—Whereas, on the publication of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry

of Coal, number S. O. 965, dated the 13^th October, 2022, published in the Gazette of India, Part II, Section 3,

Sub-Section (ii), dated the 15^th October, 2022, issued under sub-section (1) of section 9 of the Coal Bearing

Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the lands

and all rights in or over the lands described in the Schedule appended to the said notification (hereinafter

referred to as the said land) vested absolutely in the Central Government free from all encumbrances under sub-

section (1) of section 10 of the said Act ;

And, whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that the Western Coalfields Limited, District

Nagpur, Maharashtra (hereinafter referred to as the Government Company) is willing to comply with such terms

and conditions as the Central Government thinks fit to impose in this behalf;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 11 of the said Act, the

Central Government hereby directs that the said lands measuring 224.24 hectares (approximately) or 554.10

acres (approximately) with all rights in or over the said lands so vested, shall with effect from 15^th October,

2022 instead of continuing to so vest in the Central Government, shall vest in the Government company, subject

to the following terms and conditions, namely:-

(1) The Government company shall make all payments in respect of compensation, interest, damages and

the like, as determined under the provisions of the said Act and other relevant laws;

3084 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 31, 2022/ PAUSHA 10, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(2) A Tribunal shall be constituted under section 14 of the said Act, for the purpose of determining the

amounts payable by the Government company under condition (1) and all expenditure incurred in

connection with any such tribunal and persons appointed to assist the Tribunal shall be borne by the

Government company and similarly, all expenditure incurred in respect of all legal proceedings like

appeals, etc. for or in connection with the rights, in or over the said lands, so vested, shall also be borne

by the Government company;

(3) The Government company shall indemnify the Central Government and its officials against any other

expenditure that may be necessary in connection with any proceedings by or against the Central

Government or its officials regarding the rights in or over the said lands so vested;

(4) The Government company shall have no power to transfer the aforesaid rights in the said lands so

vested, to any other persons without the prior approval of the Central Government ; and

(5) The Government company shall abide by such directions and conditions as may be given or imposed

by the Central Government for particular areas of the said lands, as and when necessary.

[F. No. 43015/18/2019-LA&IR]

RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Director

श्रम और रोिगार मंत्राल

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 1400.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,

केन्री सरकार मेससड तजमलनाडु जमनरल्स जलजमटेड, चेन्नई के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री के. लोगना न,

कामगार, के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िडष्ट केन्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न् ा ाल , चेन्नई के पंचाट

(संिभड सं. 514/2001) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज, को प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्री सरकार को

सॉफ्ट कॉपी के सा 21.12.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. एल-29012/36/1998-आईआर(एम)]

डी.के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYEMENT

New Delhi, the 21st December, 2022

S.O. 1400.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 514/2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal

cum Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in

relation to M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd., Chennai and Shri K. Loganathan, Worker, which was received along

with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 21.12.2022.

[No. 29012/36/1998-IR(M)]

D.K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT

CHENNAI

ID No. 514/2001

Present: DIPTI MOHAPATRA, LL.M Presiding Officer

Date: 25.11.2022

Sh. K. Loganathan

S/o Kanniappan

North Street, Seeliampatti Post

Attur Taluk

Salem

…1^st Party/Petitioner

AND

M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd.

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम्बर 31, 2022/पौष 10, 1944

3085

The Chairman-cum-Managing Director

31. Kamarajar Salai, TWAD House

Chepauk, PO 2961

Chennai-600005

…2^nd Party/Respondent

Appearance:

For the First Party Petitioner

: Advocate, Sri Ajoy Khose

For the Second Party Respondent

:

Advocates, M/s T.R. Sathiyamohan

AWARD

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour & Employment vide its Order No. L-29012/36/98/IR(M)

dtd. 08.09.1998 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.

The schedule mentioned in that order is:

“Whether Shri K. Loganathan, Ex-Chisleman worked on piece rate basis is a

workman within the meaning of Section 2(S)of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947? If

Sri K. Loganathan is a workman, whether the action of management of Tamil Nadu

Minerals Ltd., Chennai in denying the employment to him with effect from

December 1994 is justified or not?

If not justified, to what relief Sri K. Loganathan is entitled?

2.

It is pertinent to mention that pursuant to the order of Ministry of Labour and Employment,

Government of India, the case record was transferred to CGIT by the State Industrial Tribunal vide it’s letter

dtd 25.01.2001. On receipt, the record was taken to file as ID 514/2001 on dtd. 19.02.2001.

3.

Since the claim Statement and the Counter Statement have already been filed by both the parties prior

to the receipt of the Record from State Tribunal, due order was passed for issuance of Notice to the

Representing Counsel fixing the case to 08.03.2001. The case was posted to several dates for almost for two

years for the same purpose. On 17.07.2002, the Representing Counsels for both parties were present and Memo

was filed informing that the Hon’ble Court granted stay of the proceedings which is supported vide Order of the

Hon’ble Court in WP 25370/2002 and WMP 34858/2002 dtd. 17.07.2002. The proceeding was stayed till a

Common Order of the Hon’ble Court dismissing the Writ Petition No. 12334/2004 and WMP 14413/2004 dated

03.11.2020 (received on 11.02.2021) in respect of entire batch cases including the case in hand. Accordingly,

the case was re-scheduled for further proceeding vide order dtd. 13.04.2021. The case was listed for further

proceeding. Due information was provided to the parties through the official website and through Notice Board.

There was change of Vakalat on the part of the Respondent. The Learned Counsel sought for time to produce

the Petitioner and to file Affidavit Evidence. Despite of several adjournments from the date of aforesaid High

Court Order (Almost 9 adjournments) till 28.04.2022, neither the Petitioner appeared nor filed any Affidavit

evidence. However without resorting to any coercive steps against the Petitioner, he was afforded with two more

chances vide dtd. 31.05.2022 and 13.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on those dates. On the other hand

the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted “No Instruction” and prays to dispose of the proceeding as

deems fit. None on behalf of the Respondent was present. Since the Hon’ble Court directed for expeditious

disposal, the Tribunal viewed sympathetically and afforded both parties to file their respective Affidavit

Evidence listing the case to 15.06.2022 and 29.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on that dates nor filed

Affidavit Evidence. None appeared for Respondent. However, for the interest of justice the case was finally

listed to 11.07.2022. Even on that day, the Petitioner did not turn up nor filed any Affidavit Evidence.

The material borne out from the discussion in preceding paragraphs, undoubtedly projects the fact that

the Petitioner is not interested to proceed with the case. It is held that there exists no dispute for adjudication as

referred by the Appropriate Govt.

In the result the reference is answered against the Petitioner.

An Award is passed accordingly.

Witnesses Examined:

For the 1^st Party Petitioner

:

Nil

For the 2^nd Party Respondent

:

Nil

Documents Marked:

On the Petitioner & Management side

:

Nil

DIPTI MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer

3086 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 31, 2022/ PAUSHA 10, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 1401.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,

केन्री सरकार मेससड तजमलनाडु जमनरल्स जलजमटेड, चेन्नई के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री वी. रामासामी ,

कामगार, के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िडष्ट केन्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न् ा ाल , चेन्नई के पंचाट

(संिभड सं. 513/2001) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज, को प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्री सरकार को

सॉफ्ट कॉपी के सा 21.12.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. एल-29012/40/1998- आईआर(एम)]

डी. के. हिम ांशु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 21st December, 2022

S.O. 1401.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 513/2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal

cum Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in

relation to M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd., Chennai and Shri V. Ramasamy, Worker, which was received along

with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 21.12.2022.

[No. L-29012/40/1998- IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

CHENNAI

ID No. 513/2001

Present: DIPTI MOHAPATRA, LL.M. Presiding Officer

Date: 25.11.2022

Sh. V. Ramasamy

S/o Venkatachalam

Keeripatti Post

Attur Taluk

Salem

…1^st Party/Petitioner

AND

M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd

The Chairman-cum-Managing Director

31. Kamarajar Salai, TWAD House

Chepauk, PO 2961

Chennai-600005

…2^nd Party/Respondent

Appearance:

For the First Party Petitioner

:

Advocate, Sri Ajoy Khose

For the Second Party Respondent

:

Advocates, M/s T.R. Sathiyamohan

AWARD

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour & Employment vide its Order No. L-29012/40/98/IR(M)

dtd. 08.09.1998 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.

The schedule mentioned in that order is:

Whether Shri V. Ramasamy, Ex-Chisleman worked on piece rate basis is a workman

within the meaning of Section 2(S)of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947? If

Sri V. Ramasamy is a workman, whether the action of management of Tamil Nadu

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम्बर 31, 2022/पौष 10, 1944

3087

Minerals Ltd., Chennai in denying the employment to him with effect from

December 1994 is justified or not?

If not justified, to what relief Sri V. Ramasamy is entitled?

2.

It is pertinent to mention that pursuant to the order of Ministry of Labour and Employment,

Government of India, the case record was transferred to CGIT by the State Industrial Tribunal vide it’s letter

dtd 25.01.2001. On receipt, the record was taken to file as ID 513/2001 on dtd. 19.02.2001.

3.

Since the claim Statement and the Counter Statement have already been filed by both the parties prior

to the receipt of the Record from State Tribunal, due order was passed for issuance of Notice to the

Representing Counsel fixing the case to 08.03.2001. The case was posted to several dates for almost for two

years for the same purpose. On 17.07.2002, the Representing Counsels for both parties were present and Memo

was filed informing that the Hon’ble Court granted stay of the proceedings which is supported vide Order of the

Hon’ble Court in WP 25370/2002 and WMP 34858/2002 dtd. 17.07.2002. The proceeding was stayed till a

Common Order of the Hon’ble Court dismissing the Writ Petition No. 12334/2004 and WMP 14413/2004 dated

03.11.2020 (received on 11.02.2021) in respect of entire batch cases including the case in hand. Accordingly,

the case was re-scheduled for further proceeding vide order dtd. 13.04.2021. The case was listed for further

proceeding. Due information was provided to the parties through the official website and through Notice Board.

There was change of Vakalat on the part of the Respondent. The Learned Counsel sought for time to produce

the Petitioner and to file Affidavit Evidence. Despite of several adjournments from the date of aforesaid High

Court Order (Almost 9 adjournments) till 28.04.2022, neither the Petitioner appeared nor filed any Affidavit

evidence. However without resorting to any coercive steps against the Petitioner, he was afforded with two more

chances vide dtd. 31.05.2022 and 13.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on those dates. On the other hand

the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted “No Instruction” and prays to dispose of the proceeding as

deems fit. None on behalf of the Respondent was present. Since the Hon’ble Court directed for expeditious

disposal, the Tribunal viewed sympathetically and afforded both parties to file their respective Affidavit

Evidence listing the case to 15.06.2022 and 29.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on that dates nor filed

Affidavit Evidence. None appeared for Respondent. However, for the interest of justice the case was finally

listed to 11.07.2022. Even on that day, the Petitioner did not turn up nor filed any Affidavit Evidence.

The material borne out from the discussion in preceding paragraphs, undoubtedly projects the fact that

the Petitioner is not interested to proceed with the case. It is held that there exists no dispute for adjudication as

referred by the Appropriate Govt.

In the result the reference is answered against the Petitioner.

An Award is passed accordingly.

DIPTI MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined:

For the 1^st Party Petitioner

:

Nil

For the 2^nd Party Respondent

:

Nil

Documents Marked:

On the Petitioner & Management side

:

Nil

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 1402.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,

केन्री सरकार मेससड तजमलनाडु जमनरल्स जलजमटेड, चेन्नई के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री वी. पेरुमल,

कामगार, के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िडष्ट केन्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न् ा ाल , चेन्नई के पंचाट (संिभड

सं. 512/2001) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज, को प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्री सरकार को सॉफ्ट

कॉपी के सा 21.12.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. एल-29012/33/1998- आईआर(एम)]

डी. के. हिम ांशु, अवर सजचव

3088 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 31, 2022/ PAUSHA 10, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 21st December, 2022

S.O. 1402.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 512/2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal

cum Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in

relation to M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd., Chennai and Shri V. Perumal, Worker, which was received along with

soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 21.12.2022.

[No. L-29012/33/1998- IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT

CHENNAI

ID No. 512/2001

Present: DIPTI MOHAPATRA, LL.M, Presiding Officer

Date: 25.11.2022

Sh. V. Perumal

S/o Vellaiyakavundar

Keelthombai, Keeripatti Post

Attur Taluk

Salem

…1^st Party/Petitioner

AND

M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd.

The Chairman-cum-Managing Director

31. Kamarajar Salai, TWAD House

Chepauk, PO 2961

Chennai-600005

…2^nd Party/Respondent

Appearance:

For the First Party Petitioner

:

Advocate, Sri Ajoy Khose

For the Second Party Respondent :

Advocates, M/s T.R. Sathiyamohan

AWARD

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour & Employment vide its Order No. L-29012/33/98/IR(M)

dtd. 08.09.1998 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.

The schedule mentioned in that order is:

“Whether Shri V. Perumal, Ex-Chisleman worked on piece rate basis is a

workman within the meaning of Section 2(S)of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947? If

Sri V. Perumal is a workman, whether the action of management of Tamil Nadu

Minerals Ltd., Chennai in denying the employment to him with effect from

December 1994 is justified or not?

If not justified, to what relief Sri V. Perumal is entitled?

2.

It is pertinent to mention that pursuant to the order of Ministry of Labour and Employment,

Government of India, the case record was transferred to CGIT by the State Industrial Tribunal vide it’s letter

dtd 25.01.2001. On receipt, the record was taken to file as ID 512/2001 on dtd. 19.02.2001.

3.

Since the claim Statement and the Counter Statement have already been filed by both the parties prior

to the receipt of the Record from State Tribunal, due order was passed for issuance of Notice to the

Representing Counsel fixing the case to 08.03.2001. The case was posted to several dates for almost for two

years for the same purpose. On 17.07.2002, the Representing Counsels for both parties were present and Memo

was filed informing that the Hon’ble Court granted stay of the proceedings which is supported vide Order of the

Hon’ble Court in WP 25370/2002 and WMP 34858/2002 dtd. 17.07.2002. The proceeding was stayed till a

Common Order of the Hon’ble Court dismissing the Writ Petition No. 12334/2004 and WMP 14413/2004 dated

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम्बर 31, 2022/पौष 10, 1944

3089

03.11.2020 (received on 11.02.2021) in respect of entire batch cases including the case in hand. Accordingly,

the case was re-scheduled for further proceeding vide order dtd. 13.04.2021. The case was listed for further

proceeding. Due information was provided to the parties through the official website and through Notice Board.

There was change of Vakalat on the part of the Respondent. The Learned Counsel sought for time to produce

the Petitioner and to file Affidavit Evidence. Despite of several adjournments from the date of aforesaid High

Court Order (Almost 9 adjournments) till 28.04.2022, neither the Petitioner appeared nor filed any Affidavit

evidence. However without resorting to any coercive steps against the Petitioner, he was afforded with two more

chances vide dtd. 31.05.2022 and 13.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on those dates. On the other hand

the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted “No Instruction” and prays to dispose of the proceeding as

deems fit. None on behalf of the Respondent was present. Since the Hon’ble Court directed for expeditious

disposal, the Tribunal viewed sympathetically and afforded both parties to file their respective Affidavit

Evidence listing the case to 15.06.2022 and 29.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on that dates nor filed

Affidavit Evidence. None appeared for Respondent. However, for the interest of justice the case was finally

listed to 11.07.2022. Even on that day, the Petitioner did not turn up nor filed any Affidavit Evidence.

The material borne out from the discussion in preceding paragraphs, undoubtedly projects the fact that

the Petitioner is not interested to proceed with the case. It is held that there exists no dispute for adjudication as

referred by the Appropriate Govt.

In the result the reference is answered against the Petitioner. The ID case stands dismissed.

An Award is passed accordingly.

DIPTI MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined:

For the 1^st Party Petitioner

:

Nil

For the 2^nd Party Respondent

:

Nil

Documents Marked:

On the Petitioner & Management side

:

Nil

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 1403.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,

केन्री सरकार गेल (इंजड ा) जलजमटेड, औरज ा के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री रघुराि ससंि, कामगार, के

बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िडष्ट केन्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न् ा ाल , कानपुर के पंचाट

(संिभड सं. 20/2020) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज, को प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्री सरकार को सॉफ्ट

कॉपी के सा 21.12.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. िेड-16025/04/2022- आईआर(एम)]

डी. के. हिम ांशु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 21st December, 2022

S.O. 1403.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.20/2020) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum

-Labour Court, Kanpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

GAIL (India) Limited, Auraiya (U.P.) and Shri Raghuraj Singh, Worker, which was received along with soft

copy of the award by the Central Government on 21.12.2022.

[No. Z-16025/04/2022- IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

3090 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 31, 2022/ PAUSHA 10, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI SOMA SHEKHAR JENA, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT KANPUR

Present: SOMA SHEKHAR JENA, HJS (Retd.)

I.D. No. 20 of 2020

No. K-10/2-1/2020-IR dated 09.07.2020

BETWEEN

The Raghuraj Singh

S/o Shri Shiv Narain Singh,

Indra Nagar, Dibiyapur,

Distt-Auraiya-206244(UP)

AND

The Executive Director,

GAIL(India) Limited,

PO: Pata, Vill-Dibiyapur,

Distt-Auraiya-206244(U.P)

AWARD

This award arises in respect of the reference mentioned in the schedule stated below as received from

the Office of Dy. Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), Kanpur in letter No. K-10/2-1/2020-IR dated

09.07.2020

SCHEDULE

‘Whether the action of management of GAIL(India) Limited, Pata, District Auraiya,

retrenching the services of Shri Raghuraj Singh without complying with the

provisions of Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is just, fair and legal? If

not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date?’

On receipt of notification, notices were issued to both the parties on 24th July 2020 fixing 14.08.2020

for filing of statement of claim. The claimant workman failed to file statement of claim on the date fixed.

Afterwards several dates were fixed for filing of statement of claim by the claimant workman but no statement

of claim has been filed.

On perusal of the record it is found that though several dates were fixed for filing of statement of claim

none appeared on behalf of the claimant workman before the Tribunal. Despite ample opportunities to claimant

workman for submitting statement of claim; the claimant workman failed to present the case before the

Tribunal. Under the cirsumstances the case was reserved for final award for non-appearance claimant workman.

From the aforesaid circumstances it is presumable that the claimant workman is not interested in

prosecuting the case further before the Tribunal.

Hence in the given circumstances the reference stands disposed of as of ‘NIL’ award.

Parties are left to bear their respective costs.

Date: 09.12.2022

SOMA SHEKHAR JENA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 1404.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,

केन्री सरकार गेल (इंजड ा) जलजमटेड, औरज ा के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री सुिील कुमार ससंि,

कामगार, के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िडष्ट केन्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न् ा ाल , कानपुर के पंचाट

(संिभड सं. 41/2020) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज, को प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्री सरकार को सॉफ्ट

कॉपी के सा 21.12.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. िेड-16025/04/2022- आईआर(एम)]

डी. के. हिम ांशु, अवर सजचव

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम्बर 31, 2022/पौष 10, 1944

3091

New Delhi, the 21st December, 2022

S.O. 1404.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.41/2020) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum

Labour Court, Kanpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

GAIL (India) Limited, Auraiya (U.P.) and Shri Sushil Kumar Singh, Worker, which was received along with

soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 21.12.2022.

[No. Z-16025/04/2022- IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI SOMA SHEKHAR JENA, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT KANPUR

Present: SOMA SHEKHAR JENA, HJS (Retd.)

I.D. No. 41 of 2020

No. K-10/2-4/2020-IR dated 09.11.2020

BETWEEN

Sh. Sushil Kumar Singh

C/o Mr. Sharad Rana (Pradhan)

Behind Jamuha Samit,

Indra Nagar, Dibiyapur

Distt: Auraiya (UP)-206244

AND

The General Manager (HR),

GAIL (India) Limited,

PO: Pata, Vill: Dibiyapur,

Distt: Auraiya (UP)-206244

AWARD

This award arises in respect of the reference mentioned in the schedule stated below as received from the

Office of Dy. Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), Kanpur in letter No. K-10/2-4/2020-IR dated 09.11.2020

SCHEDULE

‘Whether the demand of Shri Sushil Kumar Singh for his regularization of services

with the management of GAIL (India) Limited, Pata to the post of Steno, is legal

and justified? If not to what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date?’

On receipt of the letter, notices were issued to both the parties on 24th June 2021 fixing 31.08.2021 for

filing of statement of claim. The claimant workman failed to appear on the date fixed. Afterwards several dates

were fixed for filing of statement of claim by the claimant workman but failed.

On perusal of the record it is found that though several dates were fixed for filing of statement of claim

none appeared on behalf of the claimant workman before the Tribunal. Despite ample opportunities to claimant

workman for submitting statement of claim; the claimant workman failed to present the case before the

Tribunal. On 03.11.2022 the case was reserved for final award for non-appearance claimant workman.

From the aforesaid circumstances it is presumable that the claimant workman is not interested in

prosecuting the case further before this Tribunal.

Hence in the given circumstances the reference stands disposed of as of ‘NIL’ award.

Parties are left to bear their respective costs.

Date: 30.11.2022

SOMA SHEKHAR JENA, Presiding Officer

3092 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 31, 2022/ PAUSHA 10, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 1405.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,

केन्री सरकार मेससड ओएनिीसी जलजमटेड; मेससड िोटल इन्िर लोक एंड मेससड िोटल ओपी रेिीडेंसी, िेिरािून के

प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री दिवाकर चौरजसआ, कामगार, के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िडष्ट केन्री सरकार

औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न् ा ाल -1, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट (संिभड सं. 129/2019) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में

दि ा ा ग ा िज, को प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्री सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के सा 12.12.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. एल-30012/21/2019- आईआर(एम)]

डी. के. हिम ांशु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 21st December, 2022

S.O. 1405.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.129/2019) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal

cum Labour Court-1, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in

relation to M/s ONGC Ltd.; M/s Hotel Inder Lok and M/s Hotel OP Residency, Dehradun, and Shri Diwakar

Chaurasia, Worker, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on

12.12.2022.

[No. L-30012/21/2019 - IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE JUSTICE VIKAS KUNVAR SRIVASTAVA (RETD.), PRESIDING OFFICER,

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT, CENTRAL

GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM-LABOUR COURT-I, NEW DELHI

ID.NO. 129/2019

Sh.Diwakar Chaurasia,

At—90, Ballupur, Dehradun,

Uttrakhand-248001.

…. Workman

Versus

1. The General Manager,

(Corporate Administration),

M/s ONGC Ltd., Tel Bhawan,

Dehradun-248003.

2. The Managing Director,

M/s Hotel OP Residency,

Dehradun-248001.

3. The Managing Director,

M/s Hotel OP Residency,

Rajender Nagar, Kaulagarh Road,

Dehradun-248001

…Management

AWARD

In the present case, a reference was received from the appropriate Government vide letter No.-

30012/21/2019–IR(M) dated 27.05.2019 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10

of the Act, for adjudication of a dispute, terms of which are as under:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of Shri Diwakar Chaurasia to be reinstated in the service by the

present contractor M/s LP Residency or for that matter any contractor working as on date

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम्बर 31, 2022/पौष 10, 1944

3093

as per fair wage policy of ONGC limited, Dehradun is proper, legal and justified ? If so,

what relief Shri Diwakar Chaurasia is entitled to and from which date ?”

2. In the reference order, the appropriate Government commanded the parties raising the dispute to file

statement of claim, complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses with this Tribunal within

15 days of receipt of the reference order and to forward a copy of such statement of claim to the opposite parties

involved in the dispute. Despite directions so given, management union opted not to file the written statement

with the Tribunal.

3. On receipt of the above reference, notice was sent to the workman as well as the managements. Neither

the postal article sent to the claimant, referred above, was received back nor was it observed by the Tribunal

that postal services remained unserved in the period, referred above. Therefore, every presumption lies in

favour of the fact that the above notice was served upon the claimant. Despite service of the notice, claimant

opted to abstain away from the proceedings. No claim statement was filed on his behalf. Thus, it is clear that

the workman is not interested in adjudication of the reference on merits.

4. Since the workman has neither put in his appearance nor has he led any evidence so as to prove his cause

against the management, this Tribunal is left with no choice, except to pass a ‘No Dispute/Claim’ award. Let

this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act,

1947, for publication.

Justice VIKAS KUNAVAR SHRIVASTAVA (Retd.), Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 1406.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,

केन्री सरकार मेससड तजमलनाडु जमनरल्स जलजमटेड, चेन्नई के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री एस. रामासामी,

कामगार, के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िडष्ट केन्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न् ा ाल , चेन्नई के पंचाट

(संिभड सं. 530/2001) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज, को प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्री सरकार को

सॉफ्ट कॉपी के सा 21.12.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. एल-29012/48/1998- आईआर(एम)]

डी. के. हिम ांशु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 21st December, 2022

S.O. 1406.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 530/2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal

cum Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in

relation to M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd., Chennai and Shri S. Ramasamy, Worker, which was received along

with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 21.12.2022.

[No. L-29012/48/1998- IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

CHENNAI

ID No. 530/2001

Present: DIPTI MOHAPATRA, LL.M. PRESIDING OFFICER

Date: 02.12.2022

Sh. S. Ramasamy

S/o Chellamuthu

Seeliampatti Post

Attur Taluk

Salem-636001

…1^st Party/Petitioner

3094 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 31, 2022/ PAUSHA 10, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AND

M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd

The Chairman-cum-Managing Director

31. Kamarajar Salai, TWAD House

Chepauk, PO 2961

Chennai-600005

…2^nd Party/Respondent

Appearance:

For the First Party Petitioner

:

Advocate, Sri Ajoy Khose

For the Second Party Respondent

:

Advocates, M/s T.R. Sathiyamohan

AWARD

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour & Employment vide its Order No. L-29012/48/98/IR(M)

dtd. 16.11.1998 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.

The schedule mentioned in that order is:

“Whether Shri S. Ramasamy, Ex-Chisleman worked on piece rate basis is a

workman within the meaning of Section 2(S)of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947? If Sri

S. Ramasamy is a workman, whether the action of management of Tamil Nadu

Minerals Ltd., Chennai in denying the employment to him with effect from

December 1994 is justified or not?

If not justified, to what relief Sri S. Ramasamy is entitled?

2.

It is pertinent to mention that pursuant to the order of Ministry of Labour and Employment,

Government of India, the case record was transferred to CGIT by the State Industrial Tribunal vide it’s letter

dtd 25.01.2001. On receipt, the record was taken to file as ID 530/2001 on dtd. 20.02.2001.

3.

Since the claim Statement and the Counter Statement have already been filed by both the parties prior

to the receipt of the Record from State Tribunal, due order was passed for issuance of Notice to the

Representing Counsel fixing the case to 09.03.2001. The case was posted to several dates for almost for two

years for the same purpose. On 17.07.2002, the Representing Counsels for both parties were present and Memo

was filed informing that the Hon’ble Court granted stay of the proceedings which is supported vide Order of the

Hon’ble Court in WP 25370/2002 and WMP 34858/2002 dtd. 17.07.2002. The proceeding was stayed till a

Common Order of the Hon’ble Court dismissing the Writ Petition No. 12334/2004 and WMP 14413/2004 dated

03.11.2020 (received on 11.02.2021) in respect of entire batch cases including the case in hand. Accordingly,

the case was re-scheduled for further proceeding vide order dtd. 13.04.2021. The case was listed for further

proceeding. Due information was provided to the parties through the official website and through Notice Board.

There was change of Vakalat on the part of the Respondent. The Learned Counsel sought for time to produce

the Petitioner and to file Affidavit Evidence. Despite of several adjournments from the date of aforesaid High

Court Order (Almost 9 adjournments) till 28.04.2022, neither the Petitioner appeared nor filed any Affidavit

evidence. However without resorting to any coercive steps against the Petitioner, he was afforded with two more

chances vide dtd. 31.05.2022 and 13.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on those dates. On the other hand

the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted “No Instruction” and prays to dispose of the proceeding as

deems fit. None on behalf of the Respondent was present. Since the Hon’ble Court directed for expeditious

disposal, the Tribunal viewed sympathetically and afforded both parties to file their respective Affidavit

Evidence listing the case to 15.06.2022 and 29.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on that dates nor filed

Affidavit Evidence. None appeared for Respondent. However, for the interest of justice the case was finally

listed to 11.07.2022. Even on that day, the Petitioner did not turn up nor filed any Affidavit Evidence.

The material borne out from the discussion in preceding paragraphs, undoubtedly projects the fact that

the Petitioner is not interested to proceed with the case. It is held that there exists no dispute for adjudication as

referred by the Appropriate Govt.

In the result the reference is answered against the Petitioner. The ID case stands dismissed.

An Award is passed accordingly.

PRANITA MOHANTY, Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined:

For the 1^st Party Petitioner

:

Nil

For the 2^nd Party Respondent

:

Nil

Documents Marked:

On the Petitioner & Management side :

Nil

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम्बर 31, 2022/पौष 10, 1944

3095

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 1407.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,

केन्री सरकार मेससड तजमलनाडु जमनरल्स जलजमटेड, चेन्नई के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री के. एम.

ंगराि, कामगार, के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िडष्ट केन्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न् ा ाल , चेन्नई के

पंचाट (संिभड सं. 536/2001) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज, को प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्री सरकार

को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के सा 21.12.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. एल-29012/50/1998- आईआर(एम)]

डी. के. हिम ांशु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 21st December, 2022

S.O. 1407.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 536/2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal

cum Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in

relation to M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd., Chennai and Shri K.M. Thangaraj, Worker, which was received along

with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 21.12.2022.

[No. L-29012/50/1998- IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT

CHENNAI

ID No. 536/2001

Present: DIPTI MOHAPATRA, LL.M. Presiding Officer

Date: 02.12.2022

Sh. K.M. Thangaraj

S/o Muthusamy

Kallukattu, Paithur Post

Attur Taluk

Salem-636001

…1^st Party/Petitioner

AND

M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd

The Chairman-cum-Managing Director

31. Kamarajar Salai, TWAD House

Chepauk, PO 2961

Chennai-600005

…2^nd Party/Respondent

Appearance:

For the First Party Petitioner

:

Advocate, Sri Ajoy Khose

For the Second Party Respondent

:

Advocates, M/s T.R. Sathiyamohan

AWARD

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour & Employment vide its Order No. L-29012/50/98/IR(M)

dtd. 11.12.1998 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.

The schedule mentioned in that order is:

“Whether Sri KM Thangaraj, Ex-Chisleman worked on piece rate basis is a

workman within the meaning of Section 2(S)of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947? If Sri

KM Thangaraj is a workman, whether the action of management of Tamil Nadu

3096 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 31, 2022/ PAUSHA 10, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Minerals Ltd., Chennai in denying the employment to him with effect from

December 1994 is justified or not?

If not justified, to what relief Sri KM Thangaraj is entitled?

2. It is pertinent to mention that pursuant to the order of Ministry of Labour and Employment,

Government of India, the case record was transferred to CGIT by the State Industrial Tribunal vide it’s letter

dtd 25.01.2001. On receipt, the record was taken to file as ID 536/2001 on dtd. 22.02.2001.

3. Since the claim Statement and the Counter Statement have already been filed by both the parties prior

to the receipt of the Record from State Tribunal, due order was passed for issuance of Notice to the

Representing Counsel fixing the case to 12.03.2001. The case was posted to several dates for almost for two

years for the same purpose. On 17.07.2002, the Representing Counsels for both parties were present and Memo

was filed informing that the Hon’ble Court granted stay of the proceedings which is supported vide Order of the

Hon’ble Court in WP 25370/2002 and WMP 34858/2002 dtd. 17.07.2002. The proceeding was stayed till a

Common Order of the Hon’ble Court dismissing the Writ Petition No. 12334/2004 and WMP 14413/2004 dated

03.11.2020 (received on 11.02.2021) in respect of entire batch cases including the case in hand. Accordingly,

the case was re-scheduled for further proceeding vide order dtd. 13.04.2021. The case was listed for further

proceeding. Due information was provided to the parties through the official website and through Notice Board.

There was change of Vakalat on the part of the Respondent. The Learned Counsel sought for time to produce

the Petitioner and to file Affidavit Evidence. Despite of several adjournments from the date of aforesaid High

Court Order (Almost 8/9 adjournments) till 28.04.2022, neither the Petitioner appeared nor filed any Affidavit

evidence. However without resorting to any coercive steps against the Petitioner, he was afforded with two more

chances vide dtd. 31.05.2022 and 13.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on those dates. On the other hand

the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted “No Instruction” and prays to dispose of the proceeding as

deems fit. None on behalf of the Respondent was present. Since the Hon’ble Court directed for expeditious

disposal, the Tribunal viewed sympathetically and afforded both parties to file their respective Affidavit

Evidence listing the case to 15.06.2022 and 29.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on that dates nor filed

Affidavit Evidence. None appeared for Respondent. However, for the interest of justice the case was finally

listed to 11.07.2022. Even on that day, the Petitioner did not turn up nor filed any Affidavit Evidence.

The material borne out from the discussion in preceding paragraphs, undoubtedly projects the fact that

the Petitioner is not interested to proceed with the case. It is held that there exists no dispute for adjudication as

referred by the Appropriate Govt.

In the result the reference is answered against the Petitioner. The ID case stands dismissed.

An Award is passed accordingly.

DIPTI MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined:

For the 1^st Party Petitioner

:

Nil

For the 2^nd Party Respondent

:

Nil

Documents Marked:

On the Petitioner & Management side

:

Nil

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 1408.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947(1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,

केन्री सरकार भारत पेरोजल म कॉपोरेिन जलजमटेड; मेससड ए. सवाररअजपचाई के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों

और भारत पेरोजल म वकडसड ूजन न, के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िडष्ट केन्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम

न् ा ाल , चेन्नई के पंचाट (संिभड सं. 92/2015) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज,प्रकाजित करती िज िो

केन्री सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के सा 21.12.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. एल-30011/63/2007- आईआर(एम)]

डी. के. हिम ांशु, अवर सजचव

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम्बर 31, 2022/पौष 10, 1944

3097

New Delhi, the 21st December, 2022

S.O. 1408.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 92/2015) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum

Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.; M/s A. Savariapitchai and Bharat Petroleum Workers Union, which was

received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 21.12.2022.

[No. L-30011/63/2007- IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT AND EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE

TRIBUNAL CHENNAI

I.D. No. 92/2015

Present : DIPTI MOHAPATRA, LL.M. Presiding Officer

05.08.2022

The General Secretary

Bharat Petroleum Workers Union (CITU)

16, Masilamanipuram 3^rd Street

Tuticorin-628008

...1^st Party/Petitioner Union

AND

1.

The Manager

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

(LPG Filling Plant)

Madurai Bye-Pass Road

Sipcot

Tuticorin-628008

…2^nd Party/1^st Respondent

2.

Sri S.B. Gunasingh

M/s A. Savariapitchai

397/12B, Lion’s Town

Tuticorin-628001

…2^nd Party/2^nd Respondent

Appearance:

For the 1^st Party/Petitioner

:

Advocate, M/s D. Geetha

For the 2^nd Party/1^st Management

:

Advocate, M/s T.S. Gopalan & Co.

For the 2^nd Party/2^nd Management

:

Advocate, M/s R. Arumugam

AWARD

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour & Employment vide its Order No. L-30011/63/2007-IR

(M) dtd. 16.06.2015 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.

The schedule mentioned in that order is:

“Whether the contract awarded by BPCL, LPG Bottling Plant, Tuticorin to the

Contractor S.B. Gunasingh, Tuticorin is sham and nominal? If yes, whether the

demand of the Union for absorption of 20 contract workers (List enclosed) as regular

employees in the establishment of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd, LPG Bottling

Plant, Tuticorin, is legal and justified? What relief the workmen are entitled to?”

2. On receipt of the above reference from the appropriate Government the dispute is registered as ID No.

92/2015 and due notices were issued to both the parties for their appearance fixing the case to 08.07.2021.

During the course of proceeding on 04.10.2015, the Representing Counsel for R1 filed Memo regarding the

initiation of Writ Petition before the Hon’ble Court and sought for time to produce the Order. On 20.10.2015,

the Hon’ble Court Order in WP (MD) 18502/2015 was received wherein the Hon’ble Court directed to maintain

status-quo. On 26.08.2016, this Tribunal received the copy of the order in WMP No. 9444/2016 dtd.

3098 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 31, 2022/ PAUSHA 10, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

05.08.2016 (arising out of the aforesaid Writ Petition). The Hon’ble Court while parting the WMP directed the

Labour Court to maintain status-quo with regard to the dispute. As per the Order Sheet dtd. 07.09.2016, the

Order of Stay before the Tribunal and the proceeding was stayed. On 12.01.2022, the Tribunal received the

copy of the WMP (MD) No. 18502/2015 and MP (MD) No. 1 and 2/2015 and WMP (MD) No. 9444/2016

wherein the Writ Petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

3. On 31.03.2022, the Counsel for the Petitioner and First Respondent were present and filed Memo

stating that the WP (MD) 18502/2015 and MP (MD) No. 1 & 2 of 2015 and WMP (MD) No. 9444 of 2016 was

dismissed as withdrawn vide Order dtd. 16.12.2021. Accordingly, the parties do not want to proceed with the

case. The General Secretary alongwith the Learned Counsel were present. The General Secretary was testified

in support of the contentions in the Memo regarding the fact that the members of the Union do not want to

proceed with the case. The Memo was enclosed with a list of names of the General Secretary, Sri R. Lenus and

names of Executive Body. The signature of the General Secretary appears in the list.

4. It is pertinent to mention that the First Party Union, the Bharat Petroleum Workers Union

(represented through General Secretary) do not want to proceed with the case and filed the memo for

withdrawal. It is held that the First Party Union without being coerced, influenced from any corner files the

Withdrawal Memo, the Second Party Respondent raises no dispute on this aspect. Accordingly, it is held that

the contentions of Memo of Withdrawal has got sufficient force for consideration. The prayer is allowed as

there exists no dispute for adjudication as per the reference.

The Industrial Dispute stands dismissed as withdrawn.

DIPTI MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 1409.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,

केन्री सरकार मेससड मुंबई इंटरनेिनल ए रपोर्टसड प्राइवेट जलजमटेड; ए रपोर्टसड ऑ ोररटी ऑफ़ इंजड ा एंड मेससड

दिस्ट्टल एजवएिन सर्वडस (पी) जलजमटेड के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और इंजड न ए रपोर्टसड एम्पलॉईस

ूजन न, के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िडष्ट केन्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न् ा ाल -2, मुंबई के पंचाट

(संिभड सं. कम्प्लेंट न. सी.िी.आई.टी. -2/1 ऑफ़ 2011 (अरीससंग आउट ऑफ़ ररफरेन्स न. सी.िी.आई.टी.-2/27

ऑफ़ 2003) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज, को प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्री सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के

सा 21.12.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. िेड-16025/03/2022- आईआर(एम)]

डी. के. हिम ांशु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 21st December, 2022

S.O. 1409.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT-2/1 of 2011 ( Arising out of Reference No.CGIT-2/27

of 2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court-2, Mumbai as shown in the

Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to M/s Mumbai International Airports Pvt.

Ltd.; Airports Authority of India and M/s Krystal Aviation Service (P) Ltd. and Indian Airports Employees

Union, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 21.12.2022.

[No. Z-16025/03/2022- IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI

Present: LAXMI NARAIN JINDAL, Presiding Officer

COMPLAINT No. CGIT-2/ 1 of 2011

[Arising out of Reference No. CGIT-2/ 27 of 2003]

PARTIES:-

Indian Airports Employees’ Union

CPWD Staff Colony, Sahargaon,

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम्बर 31, 2022/पौष 10, 1944

3099

MUMBAI – 400 099

…COMPLAINANT

V/s.

1. M/s. Mumbai International Airports Pvt. Ltd.,

Through their Managing Director

Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport – Terminal -IB

Vile Parle (East), Mumbai – 400 099.

2. Airports Authority of India,

Through their Regional Executive Director (WR),

Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport,

New Airport Colony, Vile Parle (East),

Mumbai – 400 099

3. M/s. Krystal Aviation Services (P) Ltd.,

15, Krystal House, Dr. Mankikar Road,

Duncan Causeway Road, Sion Talav,

Mumbai – 400 022.

…. OPPONENTS

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE COMPLAINANT

: Ms. P. S. Shetty,

Advocate with Ms.Deepti

Gopinath, General Secretary

of the Complainant Union

FOR THE OPPONENTS

: Ms. Jayeeta Das,

Advocate for Opponent No.1

Ms. Geeta Raju, Advocate

for Opponent No.2

Shri D.H. Patil, Advocate

for Opponent No.3.

Mumbai, dated the 9^th November, 2022.

AWARD

The present complaint is under Section 33-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The complainant herein is the Indian Airports Employees’ Union having its office at CPWD Staff

Colony, Sahargaon, Mumbai, which is a registered Trade Union under the Trade Unions’ Act, 1926.

Today, an application has been filed on behalf of the complainant Trade Union to withdraw the present

complaint by alleging that the matter in question has been amicably settled by the contractor – M/s. Krystal

Aviation Services (P) Ltd.

The said application for withdrawal is signed by Ms. Deepti Gopinath, General Secretary of the

complainant union.

The opposite parties No.1 to 3 have endorsed their no objection on the said application itself.

Heard.

In view of the above settlement as alleged in the application, the present complaint under Section 33-A

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is dismissed as withdrawn.

File after needful be consigned to the record room.

LAXMI NARAIN JINDAL, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 1410.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,

केन्री सरकार मेससड तजमलनाडु जमनरल्स जलजमटेड, चेन्नई के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री पी. कासी,

कामगार, के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िडष्ट केन्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न् ा ाल , चेन्नई के पंचाट

3100 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 31, 2022/ PAUSHA 10, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(संिभड सं. 537/2001) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज, को प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्री सरकार को

सॉफ्ट कॉपी के सा 21.12.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. एल-29012/53/1998- आईआर(एम)]

डी. के. हिम ांशु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 21st December, 2022

S.O. 1410.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 537/2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal

cum Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in

relation to M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd., Chennai and Shri P. Kasi, Worker, which was received along with soft

copy of the award by the Central Government on 21.12.2022.

[No. L-29012/53/1998- IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

CHENNAI

ID No. 537/2001

Present: DIPTI MOHAPATRA, LL.M. Presiding Officer

Date: 02.12.2022

Sh. P. Kasi

S/o Perumal

Kelthombai, Keeripatti Post

Attur Taluk

Salem-636001

…1^st Party/Petitioner

AND

M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd

The Chairman-cum-Managing Director

31. Kamarajar Salai, TWAD House

Chepauk, PO 2961

Chennai-600005

…2^nd Party/Respondent

Appearance:

For the First Party Petitioner

:

Advocate, Sri Ajoy Khose

For the Second Party Respondent

:

Advocates, M/s T.R. Sathiyamohan

AWARD

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour & Employment vide its Order No. L-29012/53/98/IR(M)

dtd. 11.12.1998 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.

The schedule mentioned in that order is:

“Whether Sri P. Kasi, Ex-Chisleman worked on piece rate basis is a workman

within the meaning of Section 2(S) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947? If Sri P.

Kasi is a workman, whether the action of management of Tamil Nadu Minerals

Ltd., Chennai in denying the employment to him with effect from December

1994 is justified or not?

If not justified, to what relief Sri P. Kasi is entitled?

2. It is pertinent to mention that pursuant to the order of Ministry of Labour and Employment,

Government of India, the case record was transferred to CGIT by the State Industrial Tribunal vide it’s letter

dtd 25.01.2001. On receipt, the record was taken to file as ID 537/2001 on dtd. 22.02.2001.

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम्बर 31, 2022/पौष 10, 1944

3101

3. Since the claim Statement and the Counter Statement have already been filed by both the parties prior

to the receipt of the Record from State Tribunal, due order was passed for issuance of Notice to the

Representing Counsel fixing the case to 12.03.2001. The case was posted to several dates for almost for two

years for the same purpose. On 17.07.2002, the Representing Counsels for both parties were present and Memo

was filed informing that the Hon’ble Court granted stay of the proceedings which is supported vide Order of the

Hon’ble Court in WP 25370/2002 and WMP 34858/2002 dtd. 17.07.2002. The proceeding was stayed till a

Common Order of the Hon’ble Court dismissing the Writ Petition No. 12334/2004 and WMP 14413/2004 dated

03.11.2020 (received on 11.02.2021) in respect of entire batch cases including the case in hand. Accordingly,

the case was re-scheduled for further proceeding vide order dtd. 13.04.2021. The case was listed for further

proceeding. Due information was provided to the parties through the official website and through Notice Board.

There was change of Vakalat on the part of the Respondent. The Learned Counsel sought for time to produce

the Petitioner and to file Affidavit Evidence. Despite of several adjournments from the date of aforesaid High

Court Order (Almost 8/9 adjournments) till 28.04.2022, neither the Petitioner appeared nor filed any Affidavit

evidence. However without resorting to any coercive steps against the Petitioner, he was afforded with two more

chances vide dtd. 31.05.2022 and 13.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on those dates. On the other hand

the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted “No Instruction” and prays to dispose of the proceeding as

deems fit. None on behalf of the Respondent was present. Since the Hon’ble Court directed for expeditious

disposal, the Tribunal viewed sympathetically and afforded both parties to file their respective Affidavit

Evidence listing the case to 15.06.2022 and 29.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on that dates nor filed

Affidavit Evidence. None appeared for Respondent. However, for the interest of justice the case was finally

listed to 11.07.2022. Even on that day, the Petitioner did not turn up nor filed any Affidavit Evidence.

The material borne out from the discussion in preceding paragraphs, undoubtedly projects the fact that

the Petitioner is not interested to proceed with the case. It is held that there exists no dispute for adjudication as

referred by the Appropriate Govt.

In the result the reference is answered against the Petitioner. The ID case stands dismissed.

An Award is passed accordingly.

DIPTI MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined:

For the 1^st Party Petitioner

:

Nil

For the 2^nd Party Respondent

:

Nil

Documents Marked:

On the Petitioner & Management side

:

Nil

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 1411.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,

केन्री सरकार मेससड तजमलनाडु जमनरल्स जलजमटेड, चेन्नई के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री के. कंिन,

कामगार, के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िडष्ट केन्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न् ा ाल , चेन्नई के पंचाट

(संिभड सं. 538/2001) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज, को प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्री सरकार को

सॉफ्ट कॉपी के सा 23.12.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. एल-29012/52/1998- आईआर(एम)]

डी. के. हिम ांशु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 21st December, 2022

S.O. 1411.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 538/2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal

cum Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in

relation to M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd., Chennai and Shri K. Kandan, Worker, which was received along with

soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 23.12.2022.

[No. L-29012/52/1998- IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

3102 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 31, 2022/ PAUSHA 10, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT

CHENNAI

ID No. 538/2001

Present: DIPTI MOHAPATRA, LL.M., Presiding Officer

Date: 02.12.2022

Sh. K. Kandan

S/o Kondan

Seeliampatti Post

Attur Taluk

Salem-636001

…1^st Party/Petitioner

AND

M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd

The Chairman-cum-Managing Director

31. Kamarajar Salai, TWAD House

Chepauk, PO 2961

Chennai-600005

…2^nd Party/Respondent

Appearance:

For the First Party Petitioner

:

Advocate, Sri Ajoy Khose

For the Second Party Respondent :

Advocates, M/s T.R. Sathiyamohan

AWARD

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour & Employment vide its Order No. L-29012/52/98/IR(M)

dtd. 11.12.1998 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.

The schedule mentioned in that order is:

“Whether Sri K. Kandan, Ex-Chisleman worked on piece rate basis is a

workman within the meaning of Section 2(S) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947?

If Sri K. Kandan is a workman, whether the action of management of Tamil

Nadu Minerals Ltd., Chennai in denying the employment to him with effect

from December 1994 is justified or not?

If not justified, to what relief Sri K. Kandan is entitled?

2. It is pertinent to mention that pursuant to the order of Ministry of Labour and Employment,

Government of India, the case record was transferred to CGIT by the State Industrial Tribunal vide it’s letter

dtd 25.01.2001. On receipt, the record was taken to file as ID 538/2001 on dtd. 22.02.2001.

3. Since the claim Statement and the Counter Statement have already been filed by both the parties prior

to the receipt of the Record from State Tribunal, due order was passed for issuance of Notice to the

Representing Counsel fixing the case to 12.03.2001. The case was posted to several dates for almost for two

years for the same purpose. On 17.07.2002, the Representing Counsels for both parties were present and Memo

was filed informing that the Hon’ble Court granted stay of the proceedings which is supported vide Order of the

Hon’ble Court in WP 25370/2002 and WMP 34858/2002 dtd. 17.07.2002. The proceeding was stayed till a

Common Order of the Hon’ble Court dismissing the Writ Petition No. 12334/2004 and WMP 14413/2004 dated

03.11.2020 (received on 11.02.2021) in respect of entire batch cases including the case in hand. Accordingly,

the case was re-scheduled for further proceeding vide order dtd. 13.04.2021. The case was listed for further

proceeding. Due information was provided to the parties through the official website and through Notice Board.

There was change of Vakalat on the part of the Respondent. The Learned Counsel sought for time to produce

the Petitioner and to file Affidavit Evidence. Despite of several adjournments from the date of aforesaid High

Court Order (Almost 8/9 adjournments) till 28.04.2022, neither the Petitioner appeared nor filed any Affidavit

evidence. However without resorting to any coercive steps against the Petitioner, he was afforded with two more

chances vide dtd. 31.05.2022 and 13.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on those dates. On the other hand

the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted “No Instruction” and prays to dispose of the proceeding as

deems fit. None on behalf of the Respondent was present. Since the Hon’ble Court directed for expeditious

disposal, the Tribunal viewed sympathetically and afforded both parties to file their respective Affidavit

Evidence listing the case to 15.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on that date nor filed Affidavit Evidence.

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम्बर 31, 2022/पौष 10, 1944

3103

None appeared for Respondent. However, for the interest of justice the case was finally listed to 29.06.2022.

Even on that day, the Petitioner did not turn up nor filed any Affidavit Evidence.

The material borne out from the discussion in preceding paragraphs, undoubtedly projects the fact that

the Petitioner is not interested to proceed with the case. It is held that there exists no dispute for adjudication as

referred by the Appropriate Govt.

In the result the reference is answered against the Petitioner. The ID case stands dismissed.

An Award is passed accordingly.

DIPTI MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined:

For the 1^st Party Petitioner

:

Nil

For the 2^nd Party Respondent

:

Nil

Documents Marked:

On the Petitioner & Management side :

Nil

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 1412.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्री

सरकार मेससड सुलभ इंटरनेिनल सोिल सर्वडस आगेनाइिेिन; मेससड इंजड न आ ल पेरोनास प्राइवेट जलजमटेड,

चेन्नई के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और ज रुवल्लुर मवत्ता अमजप्पुसारा पोिु तोज़जिलालार संगम, चेन्नई, के बीच

अनुबंि में जनर्िडष्ट केन्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न् ा ाल , चेन्नई पंचाट (संिभड सं्‍ ा 79/2017)

को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज,प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्री सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के सा

22.12.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. एल-30011/37/2016- आईआर(एम)]

डी. के. हिम ांशु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 21st December, 2022

S.O. 1412.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.79/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum

Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

M/s Sulabh International Social Service Organization; M/s Indian Oil Petronas Private Limited, Chennai and

Thiruvallur Mavatta Amappusara Podhu Thozhilalar Sangam, Chennai, which was received along with soft

copy of the award by the Central Government on 22.12.2022.

[No. L-30011/37/2016- IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT AND EPF APPELLATE TRIBUNALCHENNAI

Present: DIPTI MOHAPATRA, LL.M. Presiding Officer

I.D. No. 79/2017

Dtd. 05.12.2022

BETWEEN

The Secretary

Thiruvallur Mavatta Amaippusara Podhu

Thozhilalar Sangam

3104 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 31, 2022/ PAUSHA 10, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

362, Dr. Ambedkar Street, Athipattu

NCTPS Post

Chennai-600120

…First Party/Petitioner Union

AND

1. The Dy. Controller

M/s Sulabh International Social Service

Organization

New No. 9/21, 22^nd Cross Street

Besant Nagar

Chennai-600090

…Second Party/1^st Respondent

2. The Plant Manager

M/s Indian Oil Petronas Private Ltd.

Ennore Terminal

143, Athipattu Village

NCTPS Main Road

Chennai-600120

…Second Party/2^nd Respondent

Appearance:

For the 1^st Party/Petitioner Union: Advocate, M/s S. Arunachalam

For the 1^st Respondent

:

Advocate, Sri S. Natanarajan

For the 2^nd Respondent

:

Advocates, M/s Fox Mondal

AWARD

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour & Employment vide its Order No. L-30011/37/2016-IR

(M) dtd. 10.08.2017 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.

The schedule mentioned in that order is:

.“Whether the management of M/s Sulabh International Social Service

Organization, Chennai working as Contractor in the premises of Principal

Employer M/s Indian Oil Petronas Pvt. Ltd., Chennai in denying the demand of

Union of considering their members in respect of whom ID has been raised, as

workmen is justified? If not, what relief the workmen are entitled to?”

1.

On receipt of the reference as above, due notices were issued to the parties shown as Respondents. The

Claim Statement was accordingly filed by the Petitioner Union as against two Respondents including the

Managing Director, M/s The Plant Manager, Indian Oil Petronas Pvt. Ltd., Ennore Terminal 143, Athipattu

Village, NCTPS Main Road Chennai-600120. Due notices were issued to all the Respondents. While the

matter stood thus, the copy of the Order of the Hon’ble High Court of Madras in WP No. 11655/2019 and

WMP No. 11892-11893/2019 dtd. 23.04.2019 was received on 14.05.2019 wherein the Hon’ble Court

granted Interim Stay. The matter of receipt of the Hon’ble Court reflected vide Order dtd. 15.05.2019. The

proceeding of the case was accordingly listed to several dates awaiting further order of the Hon’ble Court.

While the matter stood thus, the General Secretary of the First Party Union files a Memo alongwith a

Memorandum of Settlement arrived under Section-12(3) of the ID Act executed in between the First Party

with the Authorized Representative of the Contractor which is enclosed with the Web Copy of the Hon’ble

High Court of Madras in WP 11655/2019 and WMP 11892-11893/2019 dtd. 15.11.2022. The Order of the

Hon’ble Court reads as follows :

“In view of the endorsement made by the Learned Counsel for the

Petitioner, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed”.

2. In view of the Order since the Interim Stay deems to have been vacated, the submission of both parties

are taken into consideration. It is mentioned in the Memo that the General Secretary of the First Party Union

since already settled the dispute with the Second Respondent, they do not want to proceed with the case but to

withdraw. It is also submitted that the First Party Union has got no claim against the First Respondent viz.

Sulabh International Social Services. The General Secretary of the First Party and its Counsel and the Counsels

for the Respondents since were very much present, it is felt proper to examine the General Secretary, Sri S.

Janakiraman as WW1 with regard to the fact mentioned in the Memo.

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम्बर 31, 2022/पौष 10, 1944

3105

3. On askance, the General Secretary of the Petitioner Union submits that he being authorized by the

Members of the Union has filed this Memo of Withdrawal of the case. The members of the union since agreed

upon the terms and conditions of the settlement which was executed by the Union with the Contractor, the

Second Respondent in the presence of Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) on dtd. 01.09.2022. The First Party

Union has not been coerced or influenced from any corner to execute the Settlement against the Second

Respondent. It is a suo-moto voluntary Settlement executed by the First Party Union with the Second

Respondent. The copy of the Settlement is marked as Ext.W1. It is categorically stated by the General Secretary

of the First Party Union that the Petitioner’s Union will have no claim as against the First Respondent at any

point of time in future. In view of the fact as discussed and since the Memo of Withdrawal was filed voluntarily

by the First Party Union, the WW1, the General Secretary of the First Party Union prays the Tribunal to pass

necessary orders as deems fit.

4. Taking into consideration the submission of the First Party Union, it was found that the Memo of

Withdrawal has got sufficient force for consideration as much as the settlement under Ext.W1 has been

executed by the First Party and the Contractor in the presence of ALC (Central), Chennai. Ext.W1 bears the

signatures of Representative Members of the Union including the General Secretary (WW1) and M/s Prumatech

Services Pvt. Ltd., the Contractor of R2. The Seal and Signature of ALC (Central) also appears in Ext.W1.

Taking into judicial note of all the facts, it is felt that the Petitioner Union shall not be prejudiced in any manner

if permission be accorded for withdrawal of the case as the Petitioner Union itself is not willing to proceed with

the case.

In the premises in view of the discussion held in preceding paragraphs it is held that there exists no

dispute for adjudication as per the reference in the instant Industrial Dispute.

The reference is answered accordingly

DIPTI MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined:

For the 1^st Party/Petitioner Union

:

WW1, Sri S. Janaki Raman

For the 1^st and 2^nd Respondents

:

None

:

Documents Marked :

On the petitioner’s side

Ex.No. Date

Description

Ext.W1 01.09.2022

Memorandum of Settlement

On the side of First and Third Respondents

Ex. No.

Date

Description

____________Nil_________________________________

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 1413.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,

केन्री सरकार मेससड तजमलनाडु जमनरल्स जलजमटेड, चेन्नई के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री सी. कुल्लन,

कामगार, के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िडष्ट केन्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न् ा ाल , चेन्नई के पंचाट

(संिभड सं. 539/2001) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज, को प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्री सरकार को

सॉफ्ट कॉपी के सा 21.12.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. एल-29012/51/1998- आईआर(एम)]

डी. के. हिम ांशु, अवर सजचव

3106 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 31, 2022/ PAUSHA 10, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 21st December, 2022

S.O. 1413.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.539/2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal

cum Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in

relation to M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd., Chennai and Shri C. Kullan, Worker, which was received along with

soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 21.12.2022.

[No. L-29012/51/1998- IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT

CHENNAI

ID No. 539/2001

Present: DIPTI MOHAPATRA, LL.M. Presiding Officer

Date: 02.12.2022

Sh. C. Kullan

Thavalapatti, Paithur Post

Attur Taluk

Salem-636001

…1^st Party/Petitioner

AND

M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd

The Chairman-cum-Managing Director

31. Kamarajar Salai, TWAD House

Chepauk, PO 2961

Chennai-600005

…2^nd Party/Respondent

Appearance:

For the First Party Petitioner

:

Advocate, Sri Ajoy Khose

For the Second Party Respondent

:

Advocates, M/s T.R. Sathiyamohan

AWARD

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour & Employment vide its Order No. L-29012/51/98/IR(M)

dtd. 11.12.1998 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.

The schedule mentioned in that order is:

“Whether Sri C. Kullan, Ex-Chisleman worked on piece rate basis is a workman

within the meaning of Section 2(S) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947? If Sri C.

Kullan is a workman, whether the action of management of Tamil Nadu

Minerals Ltd., Chennai in denying the employment to him with effect from

December 1994 is justified or not? ”

If not justified, to what relief Sri C. Kullan is entitled?

2.

It is pertinent to mention that pursuant to the order of Ministry of Labour and Employment,

Government of India, the case record was transferred to CGIT by the State Industrial Tribunal vide it’s letter

dtd 25.01.2001. On receipt, the record was taken to file as ID 539/2001 on dtd. 22.02.2001.

3.

Since the claim Statement and the Counter Statement have already been filed by both the parties prior

to the receipt of the Record from State Tribunal, due order was passed for issuance of Notice to the

Representing Counsel fixing the case to 12.03.2001. The case was posted to several dates for almost for two

years for the same purpose. On 17.07.2002, the Representing Counsels for both parties were present and Memo

was filed informing that the Hon’ble Court granted stay of the proceedings which is supported vide Order of the

Hon’ble Court in WP 25370/2002 and WMP 34858/2002 dtd. 17.07.2002. The proceeding was stayed till a

Common Order of the Hon’ble Court dismissing the Writ Petition No. 12334/2004 and WMP 14413/2004 dated

03.11.2020 (received on 11.02.2021) in respect of entire batch cases including the case in hand. Accordingly,

the case was re-scheduled for further proceeding vide order dtd. 13.04.2021. The case was listed for further

proceeding. Due information was provided to the parties through the official website and through Notice Board.

There was change of Vakalat on the part of the Respondent. The Learned Counsel sought for time to produce

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम्बर 31, 2022/पौष 10, 1944

3107

the Petitioner and to file Affidavit Evidence. Despite of several adjournments from the date of aforesaid High

Court Order (Almost 8/9 adjournments) till 28.04.2022, neither the Petitioner appeared nor filed any Affidavit

evidence. However without resorting to any coercive steps against the Petitioner, he was afforded with two more

chances vide dtd. 31.05.2022 and 13.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on those dates. On the other hand

the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted “No Instruction” and prays to dispose of the proceeding as

deems fit. None on behalf of the Respondent was present. Since the Hon’ble Court directed for expeditious

disposal, the Tribunal viewed sympathetically and afforded both parties to file their respective Affidavit

Evidence listing the case to 15.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on that date nor filed Affidavit Evidence.

None appeared for Respondent. However, for the interest of justice the case was finally listed to 29.06.2022.

Even on that day, the Petitioner did not turn up nor filed any Affidavit Evidence.

The material borne out from the discussion in preceding paragraphs, undoubtedly projects the fact that

the Petitioner is not interested to proceed with the case. It is held that there exists no dispute for adjudication as

referred by the Appropriate Govt.

In the result the reference is answered against the Petitioner. The ID case stands dismissed.

An Award is passed accordingly.

DIPTI MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined:

For the 1^st Party Petitioner

:

Nil

For the 2^nd Party Respondent

:

Nil

Documents Marked:

On the Petitioner & Management side

:

Nil

नई दिल्ली, 21 दिसम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 1414.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,

केन्री सरकार मेससड तजमलनाडु जमनरल्स जलजमटेड, चेन्नई के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री एस. िंमुघम,

कामगार, के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िडष्ट केन्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न् ा ाल , चेन्नई के पंचाट

(संिभड सं. 515/2001) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज, को प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्री सरकार को

सॉफ्ट कॉपी के सा 21.12.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. एल-29012/46/1998- आईआर(एम)]

डी. के. हिम ांशु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 21st December, 2022

S.O. 1414.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.515/2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal

cum Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in

relation to M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd., Chennai and Shri S. Shanmugham, Worker, which was received along

with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 21.12.2022.

[No. L-29012/46/1998- IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

CHENNAI

ID No. 515/2001

Present: DIPTI MOHAPATRA, LL.M Presiding Officer

Date: 25.11.2022

Sh. S. Shanmugham

S/o Samuvel

Eechampatti

Seeliampatti Post, Attur Taluk

3108 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 31, 2022/ PAUSHA 10, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Salem-63600

…1^st Party/Petitioner

AND

M/s Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd

The Chairman-cum-Managing Director

31. Kamarajar Salai, TWAD House

Chepauk, PO 2961

Chennai-600005

:

2^nd Party/Respondent

Appearance:

For the First Party Petitioner

:

Advocate, Sri Ajoy Khose

For the Second Party Respondent

:

Advocates, M/s T.R. Sathiyamohan

AWARD

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour & Employment vide its Order No. L-29012/46/98/IR(M)

dtd. 03.09.1998 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.

The schedule mentioned in that order is:

“Whether Shri S. Shanmugham, Ex-Chisleman worked on piece rate basis is a

workman within the meaning of Section 2(S)of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947? If Sri S.

Shanmugham is a workman, whether the action of management of Tamil Nadu

Minerals Ltd., Chennai in denying the employment to him with effect from December

1994 is justified or not? ”

If not justified, to what relief Sri S. Shanmugham is entitled?

2. It is pertinent to mention that pursuant to the order of Ministry of Labour and Employment,

Government of India, the case record was transferred to CGIT by the State Industrial Tribunal vide it’s letter

dtd 25.01.2001. On receipt, the record was taken to file as ID 515/2001 on dtd. 19.02.2001.

3. Since the claim Statement and the Counter Statement have already been filed by both the parties prior

to the receipt of the Record from State Tribunal, due order was passed for issuance of Notice to the

Representing Counsel fixing the case to 08.03.2001. The case was posted to several dates for almost for two

years for the same purpose. On 17.07.2002, the Representing Counsels for both parties were present and Memo

was filed informing that the Hon’ble Court granted stay of the proceedings which is supported vide Order of the

Hon’ble Court in WP 25370/2002 and WMP 34858/2002 dtd. 17.07.2002. The proceeding was stayed till a

Common Order of the Hon’ble Court dismissing the Writ Petition No. 12334/2004 and WMP 14413/2004 dated

03.11.2020 (received on 11.02.2021) in respect of entire batch cases including the case in hand. Accordingly,

the case was re-scheduled for further proceeding vide order dtd. 13.04.2021. The case was listed for further

proceeding. Due information was provided to the parties through the official website and through Notice Board.

There was change of Vakalat on the part of the Respondent. The Learned Counsel sought for time to produce

the Petitioner and to file Affidavit Evidence. Despite of several adjournments from the date of aforesaid High

Court Order (Almost 9 adjournments) till 28.04.2022, neither the Petitioner appeared nor filed any Affidavit

evidence. However without resorting to any coercive steps against the Petitioner, he was afforded with two more

chances vide dtd. 31.05.2022 and 13.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on those dates. On the other hand

the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted “No Instruction” and prays to dispose of the proceeding as

deems fit. None on behalf of the Respondent was present. Since the Hon’ble Court directed for expeditious

disposal, the Tribunal viewed sympathetically and afforded both parties to file their respective Affidavit

Evidence listing the case to 15.06.2022 and 29.06.2022. The Petitioner did not turn up on that dates nor filed

Affidavit Evidence. None appeared for Respondent. However, for the interest of justice the case was finally

listed to 11.07.2022. Even on that day, the Petitioner did not turn up nor filed any Affidavit Evidence.

The material borne out from the discussion in preceding paragraphs, undoubtedly projects the fact that

the Petitioner is not interested to proceed with the case. It is held that there exists no dispute for adjudication as

referred by the Appropriate Govt.

In the result the reference is answered against the Petitioner. The ID case stands dismissed.

An Award is passed accordingly.

DIPTI MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer

[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम्बर 31, 2022/पौष 10, 1944

3109

Witnesses Examined:

For the 1^st Party Petitioner

:

Nil

For the 2^nd Party Respondent

:

Nil

Documents Marked:

On the Petitioner & Management side

:

Nil

नई दिल्ली, 22 दिसम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 1415.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,

केन्री सरकार मजनेिर, मेससड मारुजत माबडल, उि पुर (रािस्ट् ान), के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और अध् क्ष,

िनिाजत ान मज़िूर संघ के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िडष्ट औद्योजगक अजिकरण- सि-श्रम न् ा ाल उि पुर के पंचाट

(संिभड सं. 27/2015 आई. टी. आर. (सी)) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज, को प्रकाजित करती िज िो

केन्री सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के सा 08.12.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. एल-28011/17/2015- आईआर(एम)]

डी. के. हिम ांशु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 22nd December, 2022

S.O. 1415.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 27/2015 I.T.R.(C)) of the Industrial Tribunal cum Labour

Court, Udaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to The

Manager, M/s Maruti Marble, Udaipur (Rajasthan), and The President, Janjati Khan Mazdoor Sangh, which was

received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 08.12.2022.

[No. L-28011/17/2015- IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

अनुबंि

I.T.R(C)- izdj.k la[;k 27@2015

vf/klwpuk uEcj %& L-28011/17/2015-IR(M) fnukad 22-06-2015

v/;{k]tu tkfr [kku etnwj la?k

eSustj eS- ek:fr ekcZy

izkFkhZ vfHkHkk"kd mifLFkr A

izkFkhZ vfHkHkk"kd us izdj.k esa fnuakd 25-02-2022 dks yksd vnkyr dh Hkkouk ls izsfjr gksdj

Not Press fd;k rFkk dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha pkgh A izkFkhZ i{k }kjk dk;Zokgh ugha pkgus ds dkj.k vc

i{kdkjku ds e/; dksbZ fookn 'ks"k ugha jgrk gS A

izkFkhZ ds bl fookn esa No Dispute award' dksbZ fookn ugha dk iapkV ikfjr fd;k tkrk gS A

lwpuk izdk'kukFkZ Hkkjr&ljdkj dks Hksth tkos A

i=koyh QSly 'kqekj gksdj nkf[ky n¶rj gks A

lnL;

v/;{k]

yksd vnkyr

yksd vnkyr

f'ko dqekj 'kekZ] न् ा ािीि

3110 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 31, 2022/ PAUSHA 10, 1944

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 22 दिसम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 1416.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,

केन्री सरकार मजनेिर, मेससड एच. एम. टी. स्ट्पेन्टाइन माबडल, उि पुर (रािस्ट् ान),के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों

और अध् क्ष, िनिाजत ान मज़िूर संघ के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िडष्ट औद्योजगक अजिकरण- सि-श्रम न् ा ाल उि पुर

के पंचाट (संिभड सं. 52/2015 आई. टी. आर. (सी)) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज, को प्रकाजित करती

िज िो केन्री सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के सा 08.12.2022 को प्राप्त हुआ ा l

[सं. एल-28011/10/2015- आईआर(एम)]

डी. के. हिम ांशु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 22nd December, 2022

S.O. 1416.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.52/2015 I.T.R.(C)) of the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court, Udaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to The

Manager, M/s H. M. T. Spentine Marble, Udaipur (Rajasthan), and The President, Janjati Khan Mazdoor Sangh,

which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 08.12.2022.

[No. L-28011/10/2015- IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

अनुबंि

I.T.R(C)- izdj.k la[;k 52@2015

vf/klwpuk uEcj %& L-28011/10/2015-IR(M) fnukad 23-06-2015

v/;{k] tutkfr [kku etnwj la?k cuke eSustj] eS- ,p-,e-Vh- LisUVkbZu ekcZy

izkFkhZ vfHkHkk"kd mifLFkr A

izkFkhZ vfHkHkk"kd us izdj.k esa fnuakd 09-03-2022 dks yksd vnkyr dh Hkkouk ls izsfjr gksdj Not

Press fd;k rFkk dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha pkgh A izkFkhZ i{k }kjk dk;Zokgh ugha pkgus ds dkj.k vc i{kdkjku ds

e/; dksbZ fookn 'ks"k ugha jgrk gS A

izkFkhZ ds bl fookn esa No Dispute award' dksbZ fookn ugha dk iapkV ikfjr fd;k tkrk gS A

lwpuk izdk'kukFkZ Hkkjr&ljdkj dks Hksth tkos A

i=koyh QSly 'kqekj gksdj nkf[ky n¶rj gks A

lnL;

v/;{k]

yksd vnkyr

yksd vnkyr

f'ko dqekj 'kekZ] न् ा ािीि

नई दिल्ली, 22 दिसम्बर, 2022

का.आ. 1417.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,

केन्री सरकार मजनेिर, मेससड श्री ररषभ बर्िड ा माबडल, उि पुर (रािस्ट् ान), के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और

अध् क्ष, िनिाजत ान मज़िूर संघ के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िडष्ट औद्योजगक अजिकरण- सि-श्रम न् ा ाल उि पुर के