3900 GI/2023

(249)

रजिस्ट्री सं. डी.एल. (एन) 04/0007/2003—05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

xxxGIDHxxx

xxxGIDExxx

प्राजिकार से प्रकाजित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप् ताजिक

WEEKLY

सं. 7]

नई दिल् ली, िून 25—िुलाई 1, 2023, िजनवार/आषाढ़ 4—आषाढ़ 10, 1945

No. 7]

NEW DELHI, JUNE 25—JULY 1, 2023, SATURDAY/ASADHA 4–ASADHA 10, 1945

इस भाग में जभन् न पृष् ठ संख् या िी िाती िै जिससे दक यि पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा िा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II—खण् ड 3—उप-खण् ड (iii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (iii)

केन् रीय अजिकाररयों (संघ राज् यक्षेत्र प्रिासनों को छोड़कर) द्वारा िारी दकए गए सािारण आिेि और अजिसूचनाएं

Orders and Notifications issued by the Central Authorities (Other than the Administrations of Union

Territories)

भारत जनवााचन आयोग

अजिसूचना

नई दिल् ली, 22 िून, 2023

आ.अ. 109.—लोक प्रजतजनजित्व अजिजनयम, 1951 (1951 का 43) की िारा 106 (ख) के अनुसरण में,

जनवााचन आयोग एति्द्वारा जनवााचन अिी सं. 12/2019 में दिये गये उच्च न्यायालय ओजडिा, कटक के तारीख

19 अप्रैल, 2023 के आिेि को प्रकाजित करता िै ।

[फा. संं. 82/OR-HP/(12/2019)/2023]

आिेि से,

राकेि कुमार, सजचव

सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-08072023-247123

CG-DL-W-08072023-247123

250

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 1, 2023/ASADHA 10, 1945

[PART II—SEC. 3(iii)]

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 22nd June, 2023

O.N. 109.—In pursuance of Section 106 (a) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (43 of 1951), the

Election Commission hereby publishes the Order dated 19th April, 2023 of the High Court of Odisha, Cuttack in

Election Petition No. 12/2019.

[F. No. 82/OR-HP/(12/2019)/2023]

By Orders,

RAKESH KUMAR, Secy.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ELEPT No. 12 of 2019

Mahammad Sahirulhak Haque@ ….

Election Petitioner

Mr. Sidharth Prasad Das, Advocate

-Versus-

1. Pratap Chandra Sarangi

2. Navajyoti Patnaik

3. Hajisk Abdul Istar

4. Rabindra Kumar Jena

5. Jadunath Sethi

6. Basantalata Pattnayak

7. Ramnath Barik

8. Saroj Kumar Panda

9. Jagannath Das

10. Subhash

11. Ramakanta Panda

12. Mohammed Ali

…..Respondents

Mr. Pitambar Acharya

Senior Advocate For respondents No. 1

Mr. Gopal Kumar Agarwal

Standing Counsel for Elcetion

Commission of India

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO

ORDER

19.04.2023

Order No. I.A. No. 12 of 2021

08. This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).

This interim application has been filed by the Collector and District Election Officer, Balasore to allow the

District Election Officer to open the strong room forthwith, remove the EVMs and VVPATs for any future election or

any other purpose and to allow transportation of EVMs to other States/manufacturing companies or to the warehouse

of Election Commission of India as per the norms/guidelines of the Election Commission of India.

Mr. Gopal Kumar Agarwal, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Election Commission of India-

petitioner submitted that the EVMs and VVPATs are not the subject matter of the election dispute and if those are

released in favour of the petitioner, the election petition proceeding will not be hampered in any way.

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(iii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : िुलाई 1, 2023/ आषाढ़ 10, 1945

251

Even though the interim application has been filed since 26.10.2021 and copy of the same has been handed

over to the election petitioner but no objection has been filed.

Learned counsel for the election petitioner is present so also Mr. Pitambar Acharya, learned Senior Advocate

appearing for the respondent No.1.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and after going through the

averments taken in the interim application, the prayer is allowed. The District Election Officer is allowed to open the

strong room, remove the EVMs and VVPATs for any future election or any other purpose and also allowed for

transportation of EVMs to other States/manufacturing companies or to the warehouse of Election Commission of

India as per the norms/guidelines of the Election Commission of India.

Accordingly, 1.A. is disposed of.

-Sd-

S. K. SAHOO Judge

ELPET No. 12 of 2019

09 Heard Mr. Sidharth Prasad Das, learned counsel for the election petitioner, Mr. Pitambar Acharya, Learned

Senior Advocate appearing for the respondent No.1 and Mr. Gopal Agarwal, learned Standing Counsel appearing for

the Election Commission of India.

No other counsel, who have entered appearance for some of the respondents are present.

The election petition was admitted on 07.02.2020 and summons were directed to be issued to the respondents

by special messenger, cost of which was directed to be assessed and deposit be made by 11.02.2020 and notice was

directed to be made returnable within a week. The matter was then listed on 13.03.2020 and on that day, learned

counsel for the election petitioner submitted that he will file an affidavit treating the summons received by the

daughter of the respondent No.12 as sufficient service on respondent No.12 since she is living jointly with the

addressee as reported in the S.R.

Summons on respondent No. 8 was returned unserved with postal endorsement 'unknown'. Since such

summons issued to respondent No. 8 through special messenger was also returned unserved with report that the

addressee was not present in the given address and nobody has signed as a witness in the summons, learned counsel

for the election petitioner was directed to take fresh steps for issuance of summons on respondent No. 8 for which

speed post requisites were directed to be filed along with the present correct address by 20.03.2020.

Today, the matter has come on being mentioned by the learned Standing Counsel for the Election

Commission of India to pass necessary orders in I.A. No. 12 of 2021, however, the Registry has reported that service

affidavit regarding sufficiency of service of summons on respondents Nos. 10 and 12 has not filed, A.D. of summon

on respondent No. 4 returned with a signature not legible and summon on respondent No. 8 returned unserved with

postal remark 'unknown'. No steps have been taken by the learned counsel for the election petitioner. No mention

memo has been filed for listing this matter after 13.03.2020. In the meantime, more than three years have passed.

Today, learned counsel for the election petitioner submitted that he has no instruction in the matter.

In view of such submission, the election petition stands dismissed.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

-Sd-

S. K. SAHOO Judge

Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.

KUMER

CHAND

MEENA

Digitally signed by KUMER

CHAND MEENA

Date: 2023.07.08 17:00:51

+05'30'