4036 GI/2023

(2249)

रजिस्ट्री सं. डी.एल. (एन) 04/0007/2003—05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

xxxGIDHxxx

xxxGIDExxx

प्राजिकार से प्रकाजित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप् ताजिक

WEEKLY

सं. 27]

नई दिल् ली, िुलाई 2—िुलाई 8, 2023, िजनवार/आषाढ़ 11—आषाढ़ 17, 1945

No. 27]

NEW DELHI, JULY 2—JULY 8, 2023, SATURDAY/ASHADHA 11—ASHADHA 17, 1945

इस भाग में जभन् न पृष् ठ संख् या िी िाती िै जिससे दक यि पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा िा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II—खण् ड 3—उप-खण् ड (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों (रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर) द्वारा िारी दकए गए सांजवजिक आिेि और अजिसूचनाएं

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

जवत्त मंत्रालय

(जवत्तीय सेवाएं जवभाग)

नई दिल्ली, 21 िून, 2023

का.आ. 1103.—भारतीय ररिवव बैंक अजिजनयम, 1934 की िारा 8 की उपिारा (4) के साथ परठत उप-िारा

(1) के खंड (क) द्वारा प्रित्त िजियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्रीय सरकार, एति्द्वारा, भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक के प्रबंि जनिेिक

श्री स्ट्वामीनाथन िानकीरामन (िन् म जतजथ: 4.2.1964) को कायवभार ग्रिण करने की तारीख से तीन वर्व की अवजि के

जलए अथवा अगले आिेिों तक, िो भी पिले िो, भारतीय ररिवव बैंक के उप-गवनवर (डीिी) के पि पर जनयुि करती िै।

[ईफा. सं. 1/1/2022-बीओ-I]

के. बी. नैय्यर, उप सजचव

सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-22072023-247495

CG-DL-W-22072023-247495

2250

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 8, 2023/ASHADHA 17, 1945

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Financial Services)

New Delhi, the 21st June, 2023

S.O. 1103.— In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (1) read with sub-section (4) of

section 8 of The Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Swaminathan

Janakiraman (DoB: 4.2.1964), Managing Director, State Bank of India to the post of Deputy Governor (DG), Reserve

Bank of India, for a period of three years from the date of joining the post or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[eF. No. 1/1/2022-BO-I]

K. B. NAYYAR, Dy. Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 28 िून, 2023

का.आ. 1104.—भारतीय िीवन बीमा जनगम अजिजनयम, 1956 (1956 का 31) की िारा 4(2)(घ) द्वारा प्रित्त

िजियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्रीय सरकार, एति्द्वारा, श्री सुजचन्र जमश्रा के स्ट्थान पर डॉ एम. पी. तजन्गराला, अपर

सजचव, जवत्तीय सेवाएं जवभाग को तत्काल प्रभाव से और अगले आिेिों तक, भारतीय िीवन बीमा जनगम के बोडव में

जनिेिक नाजमत करती िै।

[फा. सं. ए-11011/04/2022-बीमा-I]

जवनोि कुमार, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 28th June, 2023

S.O. 1104.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 4(2)(d) of the Life Insurance Corporation of

India Act, 1956 (31 of 1956), the Central Government hereby nominates, Dr. M. P. Tangirala, Additional Secretary,

Department of Financial Services as Director on the Board of the Life Insurance Corporation of India, with immediate

effect and until further orders, vice Suchindra Misra.

[F. No. A-11011/04/2022-Ins.I]

VINOD KUMAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 28 िून, 2023

का.आ. 1105.—बीमा जवजनयामक और जवकास प्राजिकरण अजिजनयम, 1999 (1999 का 41) की िारा 4 द्वारा

प्रित्त िजियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्रीय सरकार, एति्द्वारा, श्री सुजचन्र जमश्रा के स्ट्थान पर डॉ एम. पी. तजन्गराला,

अपर सजचव, जवत्तीय सेवाएं जवभाग को तत्काल प्रभाव से और अगले आिेिों तक, भारतीय बीमा जवजनयामक और जवकास

प्राजिकरण में अंिकाजलक सिस्ट्य के रूप में नाजमत करती िै।

[फा. सं. ए-11011/04/2022-बीमा-I]

जवनोि कुमार, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 28th June, 2023

S.O. 1105.— In exercise of the powers conferred by section 4 of the Insurance Regulatory and Development

Authority Act, 1999 (41 of 1999), the Central Government hereby nominates Dr. M. P. Tangirala, Additional

Secretary, Department of Financial Services as part-time member of the Insurance Regulatory and Development

Authority of India with immediate effect and until further orders, vice Shri Suchindra Misra.

[F. No. A-11011/04/2022-Ins.I]

VINOD KUMAR, Under Secy.

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : िुलाई 8, 2023/ आर्ाढ़ 17, 1945

2251

नई दिल्ली, 30 िून, 2023

का.आ. 1106.—भारतीय जनयावत-आयात बैंक अजिजनयम, 1981 (1981 का 28) की िारा 6 की उप-िारा (1)

के खंड (ङ) के उप-खंड (i) द्वारा प्रित्त िजियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्रीय सरकार, एति्द्वारा, श्री सुजचन्र जमश्रा के स्ट्थान

पर डॉ अजभिीत फुकन, आर्थवक सलािकार, जवत्तीय सेवाएं जवभाग को तत्काल प्रभाव से और अगले आिेिों तक, भारतीय

जनयावत-आयात बैंक (एजजिम बैंक) के बोडव में जनिेिक नाजमत करती िै।

[फा. सं. 9/1/2022-आईएफ-I]

कार्तवकेय जमश्र, जनिेिक

New Delhi, the 30th June, 2023

S.O. 1106.— In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-Clause (i) of Clause (e) of sub-section (1) of

Section 6 of the Export Import Bank of India Act, 1981 (No. 28 of 1981), the Central Government hereby nominates

Dr. Abhijit Phukon, Economic Adviser, Department of Financial Services, as Director on the Board of Export Import

Bank of India (Exim Bank) vice Shri Suchindra Misra with immediate effect and until further orders.

[F. No. 9/1/2022-IF-I]

KARTIKEYA MISRA, Director

रेल मंत्रालय

(रेलवे बोडव)

नई दिल्ली, 20 अप्रैल, 2023

का.आ. 1107.—रेल मंत्रालय (रेलवे बोडव), रािभार्ा जनयम 1976 (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग)

के जनयम 10 के उपजनयम (2) और (4) के अनुसरण में जनम्नजलजखत कायावलयों ििां 80 प्रजतित से अजिक

अजिकाररयों/कमवचाररयों ने हिंिी का कायवसाि क ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जलया िै, को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजचत करता िै:-

क्षेत्रीय कायावलय, कोंकण रेलवे कॉपोरेिन जलजमटेड, कारवार।

रेल जवकास जनगम जलजमटेड, कोटा यूजनट।

रेल सुरक्षा बल क्षेत्रीय प्रजिक्षण केंर, मौला अली।

क्षेत्रीय कायावलय, इंजडयन रेलवे कैटररंग एण्ड टूररज्म कॉपोरेिन जलजमटेड, पटना।

रेलटेल कॉपोरेिन ऑफ इंजडया जलजमटेड, पटना, टेररटरी कायावलय।

रेलटेल कॉपोरेिन ऑफ इंजडया जलजमटेड, जबलासपुर, टेररटरी कायावलय

[फा. सं. हिंिी-2023/रा.भा.-1/12/1/(1440940)]

डॉ. बरुण कुमार, जनिेिक (रािभार्ा)

MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS

(Railway Board)

New Delhi, the 20th April, 2023

S.O. 1107.— Ministry of Railways (Railway Board) in pursuance of Sub Rule (2) and (4) of Rule 10 of the

Official Language Rules, 1976 (use for the Official purposes of the Union) hereby, notify the following offices where

80% or more Officers/ Employees have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-

1. Regional Office, Kokan Railway Corporation Ltd., Karwar.

2. Rail Vikas Nigam Ltd., Kota Unit.

3. Railway Protection Force, Trainning Centre, Moula Ali.

2252

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 8, 2023/ASHADHA 17, 1945

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4. Regional Office, Indian Railway Catering & Tourism Corporation Ltd., Patna.

5. RailTel Corporation of India Ltd., Patna, Territory Office.

6. RailTel Corporation of India Ltd., Bilaspur, Territory Office.

[F. No. Hindi-2023/O.L-1/12/1/( 1440940)]

Dr. BARUN KUMAR, Director (O.L.)

नई दिल्ली, 16 मई, 2023

का.आ. 1108.—रेल मंत्रालय (रेलवे बोडव), रािभार्ा जनयम 1976 (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग)

के जनयम 10 के उपजनयम (2) और (4) के अनुसरण में कारखाना पररयोिना संगठन, पटना ििां 80 प्रजतित से अजिक

अजिकाररयों/कमवचाररयों ने हिंिी का कायवसाि क ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जलया िै, को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजचत करता िै।

[फा. सं. हिंिी-2018/रा.भा.-1/12/1/(1502443)]

डॉ. बरुण कुमार, जनिेिक (रािभार्ा)

New Delhi, the 16th May, 2023

S.O. 1108.— Ministry of Railways (Railway Board) in pursuance of Sub Rule (2) and (4) of Rule 10 of the

Official Language Rules, 1976 (use for the Official purposes of the Union) hereby, notify the Workshop Projects

Organisation, Patna where 80% or more Officers/ Employees have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.

[F. No.Hindi-2018/O.L-1/12/1/(1502443)]

Dr. BARUN KUMAR, Director (O.L.)

भारी उद्योग मंत्रालय

(हिंिी अनुभाग)

नई दिल्ली, 30 िून, 2023

का.आ. 1109.—केन्रीय सरकार, रािभार्ा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976

(यथासंिोजित 1987, 2007 और 2011) के जनयम 10 के उप-जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, भारी उद्योग मंत्रालय के

जनयंत्रणािीन ‘बीएचईएल, रामचंरपुरम, िैिराबाि’’ कायावलय को, जिसके 80% से अजिक कमवचारीवृन्ि ने जिन्िी का

कायवसािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जलया िै, एतिद्वारा अजिसूजचत दकया िाता िै।

[फा. सं. ई-11012/2/2018-जिन्िी]

जविय जमत्तल, संयुज त सजचव

MINISTRY OF HEAVY INDUSTRIES

(Hindi Section)

New Delhi, the 30th June, 2023

S.O. 1109.— In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for official purposes of

the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987, 2007 and 2011), the Central Government hereby notifies the BHEL,

Ramachandrapuram, Hyderabad, an office under the control of the Ministry of Heavy Industries wherein more

than 80% staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.

[F. No. E-11012/2/2018-Hindi]

VIJAY MITTAL, Jt. Secy.

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : िुलाई 8, 2023/ आर्ाढ़ 17, 1945

2253

नई दिल्ली, 30 िून, 2023

का.आ. 1110.—केन्रीय सरकार, रािभार्ा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976

प्रिासजनक जनयंत्रणािीन केंरीय सावविजनक क्षेत्रक उद्यम, ‘’भारत िेवी इलेजजरकल्स जलजमटेड के टीबीिी,नोएडा’’ कायावलय

को, जिसके 80% से अजिक कमवचारीवृन्ि ने जिन्िी का कायवसािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जलया िै, एतिद्वारा अजिसूजचत दकया

िाता िै।

[फा. सं. ई-11012/2/2018-जिन्िी]

जविय जमत्तल, संयुज त सजचव

New Delhi, the 30th June, 2023

S.O. 1110.— In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for official purposes of

the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987, 2007 and 2011), the Central Government hereby notifies the TBG,

Noida office of “Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited,” a CPSE under the administrative control of the Ministry of

Heavy Industries wherein more than 80% staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.

[F. No. E-11012/2/2018-Hindi]

VIJAY MITTAL, Jt. Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 30 िून, 2023

का.आ. 1111.—केन्रीय सरकार, रािभार्ा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976 (यथा

संिोजित 1987, 2007 और 2011) के जनयम 10 के उप-जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, भारी उद्योग मंत्रालय के प्रिासजनक

जनयंत्रणािीन स्ट्वायत्त जनकाय ‘आईकैट, माणेसर, गुड़गांव’’ कायावलय को, जिसके 80% से अजिक कमवचारीवृन्ि ने जिन्िी का

कायवसािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जलया िै, एतिद्वारा अजिसूजचत दकया िाता िै।

[फा. सं. ई-11012/2/2018-जिन्िी]

जविय जमत्तल, संयुज त सजचव

New Delhi, the 30th June, 2023

S.O. 1111.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for official purposes of

the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987, 2007 and 2011), the Central Government hereby notifies the iCAT,

Manesar, Gurgaon office an Autonomous body under the administrative control of the Ministry of Heavy Industries

wherein more than 80% staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.

[F. No. E-11012/2/2018-Hindi]

VIJAY MITTAL, Jt. Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 30 िून, 2023

का.आ. 1112.—केन्रीय सरकार, रािभार्ा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976

प्रिासजनक जनयंत्रणािीन ‘नेिनल ऑटोमोरटव बोडव, माणेसर, गुड़गांव’’ कायावलय को, जिसके 80% से अजिक कमवचारीवृन्ि

ने जिन्िी का कायवसािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जलया िै, एतिद्वारा अजिसूजचत दकया िाता िै।

[फा. सं. ई-11012/2/2018-जिन्िी]

जविय जमत्तल, संयुज त सजचव

2254

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 8, 2023/ASHADHA 17, 1945

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 30th June, 2023

S.O. 1112.— In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for official purposes of

the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987, 2007 and 2011), the Central Government hereby notifies the National

Automotive Board, Manesar, Gurgaon, an office under the administrative control of the Ministry of Heavy Industries

wherein more than 80% staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.

[F. No. E-11012/2/2018-Hindi]

VIJAY MITTAL, Jt. Secy.

श्रम और रोिगार मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 10 अप्रैल, 2023

का.आ. 1113.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj cSad vkWQ egkjk"Vª ds izca/kra=] laca) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] iqus ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 22@2015½ dks izdkf'kr

djrh gSA

[सं. ,y-12011@86@2011-vkbZ vkj ¼ch-II)]

सलोनी, उप जनिेिक

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYEMENT

New Delhi, the 10th April, 2023

S.O. 1113.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 22/2015) of the Cent. Govt. Indus. Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

Pune as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Bank of Maharashtra and their

workmen.

[No. L-12011/86/2011-IR(B.II)]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT PUNE

Presided Over by SHRI. K. N. GAUTAM

Reference IT NO. 22 OF 2015

Bank of Maharashtra

Lok Managal, 1501, Shivaji Nagar,

Pune 411005

…First Party

Versus

The General Secretary

Bank of Maharashtra Employees Union

C/o. Bank of Maharashtra, Lok Mangal,

1501, Shivajinagar, Pune 411005

…Second Party

AWARD

( Dated : 07.10.2022 )

This is a reference forwarded by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi vide order dated

24.05.2012 in exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (d) of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 in respect of dispute between first party and second party as mentioned in the

Schedule annexed to the order of the reference for adjudication to this Tribunal.

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : िुलाई 8, 2023/ आर्ाढ़ 17, 1945

2255

After receiving the said reference, notices were issued to both parties. After filing statement of claim and

written statement by both the parties, the issues were framed on 23.8.2022. However, no evidence led by the Second

Party since then. The learned counsel for the Second Party filed purshis at Exh. U-5 dated 7.10.2022 that he is having

no instructions from the Second Party. The roznama shows that the second party failed to take any steps to lead

evidence and to proceed with the reference. It appears that the second party has lost interest. In view of this in

absence of evidence of the second party, the demands of second party cannot be adjudicated. Therefore, I have no

alternative, but to answer the reference in the negative. With this, I proceed to pass the following award :-

-: AWARD :-

The reference is answered in the negative.

No order as to costs.

The copies of this award be sent to the appropriate authority of the Government.

Dated: 07.10.2022

K. N. GAUTAM, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 10 मई, 2023

का.आ. 1114.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,

केन्रीय सरकार मुख्य मिाप्रबंिक, िूरसंचार, बीएसएनएल, एजबड्स, िैिराबाि; सिायक मिाप्रबंिक (प्रिासन),

ओ/ओ सीिीएमटी, ए.पी. सर्कवल, िैिराबाि, के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री िेवमबोटला बालाचौिेश्वर

िमाव, कामगार, के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िवष्ट केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण- सि-श्रम न्यायालय-िैिराबाि के

पंचाट (संिभव संख्या 15/2012) को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै, को प्रकाजित करती िै िो केन्रीय

सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 10.05.2023 को प्राप्त हुआ था l

[सं. एल-42025-07-2023-90-आईआर(डीयू)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 10th May, 2023

S.O. 1114.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 15/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum

Labour Court – Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

The Chief General Manager, Telecommunications, BSNL, Abids, Hyderabad; The Assistant General Manager

(Admn.), O/o CGMT, A.P. Circle, Hyderabad, and Shri Devambotla Balachowdeshwara Sarma, Worker, which was

received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 10.05.2023.

[No. L-42025-07-2023-90-IR (DU)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present: Sri IRFAN QAMAR Presiding Officer

Dated the 7^th day of March, 2023

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C. No. 15/2012

Between:

Sri Devambotla Balachowdeshwara Sarma,

S/o Venkateswar Rao,

R/o Peddalingala (V),

Nandivada(M), Krishna

…Petitioner

2256

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 8, 2023/ASHADHA 17, 1945

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AND

The Chief General Manager,

Telecommunications, BSNL,

Abids, Hyderabad.

The Assistant General Manager (Admn.)

O/o CGMT, A.P. Circle,

Hyderabad – 1.

…Respondents

Appearances:

For the Petitioner :

M/s. M.V. Hanumantha Rao, Advocates

For the Respondent :

Sri S. Prabhakar Reddy, Advocate

AWARD

Sri Devambotla Balachowdeshwara Sarma, who worked as Mazdoor (who will be referred to as the

workman) has filed this petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents,

Railway Electrification Project (REF), BSNL, Secunderabad seeking for declaring the proceeding No. TA/STB/20-

2/REP/06-10/22 dated 27.4.2010 issued by the Respondent as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, violative of principles

of natural justice and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to regularize or re-engage the

Petitioner into service duly granting all the consequential benefits and such other reliefs as this court may deems fit.

The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:

It is submitted that the Petitioner has worked as Mazdoor in Railway Electrification Project(REF) Secunderabad to

Nagpur from 1.1.1994 to 30.9.1996 for 1004 days along with others. The Petitioner submitted that thereafter he along

with others continued on voucher payment basis for some time and thereafter on contract basis. Petitioner along with

others have been requesting for regularization or to provide regular work still no action has been taken by the

department, though they have worked for a considerable period. Further, petitioner came to know that by proceedings

dated 21.11.2000 similarly situated 79 persons have been regularized by giving them "temporary status" by the

respondent, in fact those persons are juniors to the petitioner and other similarly situated persons. Petitioner hails from

poor family and have been pursuing the authorities since long time with a hope that the department would consider her

claim in a positive manner. Petitioner submits that, as there was no action taken by the respondents he along with

others approached Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, at Hyderabad by filing OA. Nos.

100/10 and 101/10 and the Hon'ble Tribunal after hearing both the parties disposed of the OAs, on 10.2.2010 with

specific directions "since the applicants in the OA also have similar claims as the applicants in the WP.No.12872/08, I

consider it appropriate to dispose of this Original Application by giving a direction to the applicants to file individual

representations to the respondents giving full details namely, their addresses, places at which they were engaged, the

period for which they were engaged etc., within a period of 4 weeks and on receipt of such representations, the

respondents shall examine their applications with reference to the records and the scheme that was in force and pass

orders within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of such representation.” It is submitted that, as per the

orders of the Hon'ble Tribunal the petitioner and others have submitted elaborate representations to the Respondent

No.1 along with order passed by Hon'ble Tribunal and also attendance book etc. on 3.3.2010 the Respondent No.1

instead of appreciating the circumstances and without proper verification of records and without providing

opportunity of being heard, Respondent has issued the impugned letter dt.27.4.2010 stating,

“ i) With reference to the representation, pursuant to the directions of the Hon'ble Tribunal dated 10.2.2010 in

OA. No.100/10 it is informed that the same has been duly considered having regard to the policy and

availability of records and it is regretted that it is not open to re-engage you as casual labours or grant of

temporary status under the scheme dt.7.10.1989 which has exclusive application to casual labour who

have engaged prior to 31.10.1985 up to 22.6.1988 and continued as such. The following have duly taken

into consideration for the aforesaid decision. All the casual labors who were eligible as per letter

dt.29.9.2000 of DOT were regularized as one time measure.

(ii) Records pertaining to Railway electrification Project are not available for due verification of information

furnished by you as they were weeded out as per the retention schedule. The letter of appointment and

payment thereof is requisite record to verify your engagement from 1.1.1994 to 30.9.1996 and the basis

for the same while DOT, New Delhi letter No.270-6/84-STN dt.22.6.1988 imposed ban on engagement of

casual labours including project circle.

(iii) The certification by the Divisional Engineer about such engagement is not acceptable in the absence of

records as indicated above.

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : िुलाई 8, 2023/ आर्ाढ़ 17, 1945

2257

(iv) It is stated that you have been disengaged as casual labour and also thereafter continued with contractor

and thus there is no employer-employee relationship at any point of time thereafter and as such there is no

scope to re-engage you as casual labour and also in view of the complete ban as per DOT, New Delhi

letter no.269-4/93 STN-II dt. 12.2.1999 and further affirmed vide letter No. 269-4/93/STN Il dt. 15.6.1999

and the said policy is continuing.

(v) The violation of provisions of Sec.25F of ID Act, 1947 having questioned in the appropriate forum at any

time and as such disengagement has become final for all purposes.

vi) This disposes of your representation and it is hereby clarified that no further correspondence will be

entertained on this subject.”

Petitioner submitted that the proceedings dated 27.4.2010 are ex.facie illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and

contrary to record and violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Art. 14 and 16 of Constitution of India.

It is submitted when similarly situated persons were regularized the respondent ought to have extended the same

benefit to the petitioner also. Further, the reasoning recorded by the respondent as mentioned in the clause-(i) of the

impugned order stating that benefit of extension of temporary status under scheme dated 7.10.1989 is only for casual

labours who have engaged prior to 31.10.1985 up to 22.6.1988 is not tenable and when the department had extended

similar benefit to similarly situated persons and having extracted work from the petitioner during subsequent period,

denial of said benefit amounts discrimination. The contention of the respondents as mentioned in clause-(ii), records

pertaining to Railway Electrification Project are not available as have weeded out as per the retention schedule is also

not tenable. It is submitted non-availability of the records in the department cannot be attributed to the petitioner and

respondent ought to have accepted the records produced by the petitioner. It is submitted regarding para no (4) of the

impugned order that when similarly situated persons were engaged and records shows the services rendered by the

petitioner the contention that there is no relationship as employer and employee is also not tenable. Clause (5) of the

order is not maintainable in respect of the claims of petitioner as he has been pursuing with the department to re-

engage him in the respondent department in view of their past experience. The petitioner is having record and also

the department had considered similarly situated persons as such the petitioner is entitled for relief. It is submitted that

the impugned order is not only illegal but also contrary to earlier directions issued by the Hon'ble Central

Administrative Tribunal as such as a last resort the petitioner is approaching this Hon'ble court. The petitioner, along

with others approached Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad and filed OA. No.

1229/2010 and after hearing both the sides the Hon'ble Tribunal has directed the applicants therein to approach

concerned Labour court under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 and hence, this petition. It is submitted the petitioner and

others have filed their concerned days book duly signed by the employer on every month ending, identity card, etc.,

the days book clearly postulates all the relevant information of the petitioner with regard to work i.e. MRPTS work,

cable work, or alignment, store work, etc., and Petitioner was paid Rs.60/- per day. It is therefore prayed that this

Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to i) Declare the impugned letter No.TA/STB/20-2/REP/06-10/42 dated 27.4.2010

issued by the respondent as illegal arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of principles of natural justice and

consequently set aside the said letter.

The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief

which runs as follows:

The Respondent submitted that the claim petition is misconceived and is barred by limitation. There is no

engagement of casual labour in BSNL, after 1.10.2000 and the casual labour who have been engaged as such before

the imposition of ban vide letter No.270/6/84-STN, New Delhi dated 30.3.1985 and letter No.270-6/84-STN dated

22.6.1988 for the project circles and the line dismantling in the Electrification project circles have been continued in

BSNL as a matter of policy and the Petitioner having been engaged in the project after the imposition of ban vide

letter dated 22.6.1988 is not covered by the policy thereof and it is not open for the Petitioner to assert for

reengagement or regularization under the said policy. The claimant is confusing the Hon'ble Tribunal with regard to

the letter No.TA/STB/20-2/REP/06-10/22 dated 27.4.2010 pursuant to the directions of the Hon'ble Central

Administrative Tribunal dated 10.2.2010, in OA No.100/2010 filed in continuation of WP No.12872/2008 in the

High Court seeking for the identical relief and the communication dated 27.4.2010 based on the directions

dt.10.2.2010 in O.A.No.100/2010 to comply with a judicial order notwithstanding the fact that the said

O.A.No.100/2010 is misconceived and not maintainable having regard to the definition of employee in Rule 3(8) of

BSNL & CDA Rules, 2006 implemented as such from 10.1.2006 thereby leaving no scope to exercise any jurisdiction

by the Hon'ble Tribunal and on 28.2.2011 in O.A.No.1229/2010. It is not open for the claimant to assail the same

before this Hon'ble Court in any manner for any purpose. The Railway Electrification project for line dismantling is

distinct and different and the said project is outside jurisdiction of the respondent thereby leaving no scope to

reengage any casual labour engaged by the said projects organization after the imposition of the ban and disengaging

thereafter and entrustment of the work to a contractor thereby leaving no scope for reengagement and regularization as

per the settled law. The Petitioner is relying on the documents which do not form part of the record of the respondent

without any letters of engagement and payment particulars while the maintenance of the records in not the

administrative concern of the answering respondent and no records as such are maintained after the expiry of three

2258

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 8, 2023/ASHADHA 17, 1945

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

years relating to muster roll as per the retention schedule. It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Tribunal may be

pleased to dismiss the claim petition.

Petitioner filed chief examination affidavit and examined himself as WW1 reiterating the facts stated in claim

petition stated that, he has worked as Mazdoor (casual labour) in Railway Electrification Project (REF) Secunderabad

to Nagpur from 1.1.1994 to 30.9.19996 for 1004 days along with others. Thereafter, he, along with others continued

on voucher payment basis for some time and thereafter on contract basis requesting for regularization and no action

has been taken by the department, though they have worked for a considerable period.

Respondent did not adduce any evidence on their behalf. Both parties filed written arguments as well as

submitted oral arguments.

Heard. Perused the pleadings of both the parties.

The following points arise for consideration:-

Whether the Petitioner is eligible to be regularized as temporary status with Respondent employment

under the scheme Casual Labourers (Grant of Temporary Status and Regularization) Scheme 1989?

II.

Whether order dated 27.4.2010 passed by Respondent on Petitioner’s representation is just?

III.

To what relief if any, the Petitioner is entitled?

Finding:

Points No. I & II: Before proceeding to determination on points, it would be relevant to narrate the facts

in the back drop of the matter. As pleaded by Petitioner workman Sri V. Rammeshwara Rao, he has worked as

mazdoor (casual labour) in Railway Electrification Project, Secunderabad to Nagpur from 1.1.1994 to 30.9.1996 for

1004 days along with others. The Petitioner along with others continued on voucher payment basis for some time

and thereafter on contract basis. He along with others have been requesting for regularization and to provide the

regular work. Still no action has been taken by the Department, though they have worked for a considerable period.

It is also pleaded that Petitioner came to know that by proceedings dated 21.11.2000 similarly situated 79 persons

have been regularized by giving them temporary status by the Respondents. Since no action was taken by the

Respondents he along with others approached Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench at

Hyderabad by filing OA No.100/10 and 101/10 and the Hon’ble Tribunal after hearing both the parties disposed of

the OAs, on 10.2.2010 with specific direction which reads as follows: “since the applicants in the OA also have

similar claims as the applicants in the WP No.12872/08, I consider it appropriate to dispose of this OA by giving a

direction to the applicants to file individual representations to the respondents giving full details namely, their

addresses, places at which they were engaged, the period for which they were engaged etc., within a period of 4 weeks

and on receipt of such representations, the respondents shall examine their applications with reference to the records

and the scheme that was in force and pass orders within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of such

representation.” The Petitioner in compliance of the above order moved representation dated 3.3.2010 to the

Respondent authority and Respondent rejected the representation by passing impugned order dated 8.6.2010.

Against this impugned order present industrial dispute petition has been filed by the workman before the Tribunal. It

is also submitted that the Petitioner along with others have challenged impugned order dated 27.4.2010 rejecting the

representation of Petitioner and filed OA No.1229/2010 and after hearing both the sides Hon’ble Tribunal has directed

the applicant to approach the labour court under I.D. Act, 1947. The copy of the order dated 28.2.2011 passed in OA

No.1229/2010, G. Pentaiah and others Vs. Union of India has been filed wherein Hon’ble Tribunal has observed as

below:

“8. Admittedly, the applicants were engaged between 1.1.1994 and 30.9.1996 and they do not come under

the scope of the scheme. However, a direction was given by this Tribunal earlier to examine their cases since

the applicants claimed that some juniors who were appointed subsequently had been regularized. I now find

that the Respondents have rejected the claim on the ground that relevant records have been weeded out. the

matter raised disputed questions of fact viz., whether the applicants were employed as casual labourers for

more than 1000 days and whether they are eligible for temporary status, etc. In the absence of records, it is

not possible for this Tribunal to adjudicate this matter.

9. I, therefore, dispose of this application with a direction to the applicants to approach the labour authorities

under the Industrial Disptues Act, 1947, if they are so advised, with all the relevant material so that a

decision on their eligibility for temporary status or otherwise can be taken by the Respondent authorities.

The Learned Counsel for the applicants has no objection to such a direction being given.”

Therefore, in view of the above direction of Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal, we proceed to decide

to determine the question whether the applicant was engaged as casual mazdoor for more than 1000 days and they are

eligible for temporary status.

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : िुलाई 8, 2023/ आर्ाढ़ 17, 1945

2259

In this regard, the Petitioner has pleaded that he has got engaged as mazdoor(casual labour) in Railway

Electrification Project, Secunderabad to Nagpur form 1.1.1994 to 30.9.1996 for 1004 days along with others. It is also

submitted that he along with others continued as such on voucher payment basis and later on contract basis.

10.

On the other hand, the Respondent has filed counter stating therein that there is no engagement of casual

labour in BSNL after 10.10.2000 and the casual labour who have been engaged as such before the imposition of ban

vide letter No.270/6/84-STN, New Delhi dated 30.3.1985 and letter No.270-6/84-STN dated 22.6.1988 for the project

circles and the line dismantling in the Electrification project circles have been continued in BSNL as a matter of

policy and the Petitioner having been engaged in Railway Electrification Project after the imposition of ban in project

circles vide letter dated 22.6.1988 is not covered by the policy thereof and it is not open for the Petitioner to assert

for reengagement or regularization under the said policy. It is submitted that the Petitioner is not covered under the

definition of employee with Rule 3 sub clause 8 of BSNL & CDA Rules, 2006. Therefore, it is not open for the

claimant to assail the same in any manner for any purpose. It is also submitted that Railway Electrification Project for

line dismantling is distinct and different and the said projects is out side jurisdiction of the answering Respondent

thereby leaving no scope to reengage any casual labour engaged by the said projects organization after the imposition

of the ban and disengaging thereafter and entrustment of the work to a contractor thereby leaving no scope for

reengagement and regularization as per the settled law. It is clear from pleadings of the parties that the Petitioner had

worked as a mazdoor in Railway Electrification Project of the Respondent on contract basis. The Petitioner has

submitted the documents in support of his allegation which are: Ex.W1 is photocopy of order dated 27.4.2010 which

the Respondent authority has rejected the representation of the Petitioner by assigning reasons therein. Ex.W2 is a

copy of representation dated 3.3.2010. The last para of the representation reveals that Petitioner has prayed for relief

from Respondent to provide him employment, whereas in petition he has sought relief of regularization in the

Respondent employment. Document Ex.W3 and W4 are photocopies of the orders of Hon’ble Central Administrative

Tribunal passed in OA 1229/2010 and 100/2010. Other document Ex.W5 is photocopy of order passed in OA

No.101/2010 dated 10.2.2010. The documents Ex.W6 to W9 are photocopies of the proceedings which were supplied

by the Respondent to the Petitioner which contains list of casual labour. Ex.W10 is photocopy of letter regarding

temporary status and Ex.W11 is the attendance sheets of the workman Petitioner which has been signed by Divisional

Engineer, Telecom, Secunderabad which reveals that the Petitioner has worked as mazdoor from 1.1.1994 to

30.9.1996 in Railway Electrification Project. Ex.W12 is the photocopy of identity card of WW1.

11.

It would be relevant to reproduce the provision of Sec.2(oo)(bb) of I.D. Act, 1947 which provide that,

“ (oo) “retrenchment” means the termination by the employer of the service of a workman for any reason

whatsoever, otherwise than as a punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary action but does not include:-

(bb) termination of the service of the workman as a result of the non-renewal of the contract of employment

between the employer and the workman concerned on its expiry or of such contract being terminated under a

stipulation in that behalf contained therein;’’

12.

The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of S.M. Nilajkar and ors. Vs. Telecom, District Manager has

held: “ the termination of the service of workman engaged in a scheme or project amounts to retrenchment within the

meaning of sub-clause (bb) subject to the following provision being satisfied:

That the workman was employed in a project or scheme of temporary duration;

ii)

The employment was on contract and not as a daily wager simplicitor, which provided inter alia that the

employment shall come to an end on the expiry of the scheme or project; and

iii)

The employment came to an end simultaneously with the termination of the scheme or project and

consistently with the terms of the contract.

iv)

The workman ought to have been apprised or made aware of the above said terms by the employer at the

commencement of employment.

13.

Since the Petitioner has alleged that he has worked as mazdoor from 1.1.1994 to 30.9.1996 in the Railway

Electrification Project as contract labour. It goes to show that Petitioner has worked in the Respondent employment

on a project which is open for a limited time and after completion of the project the Petitioner cannot claim any

employment or regularization in the service of the Respondent. As far as the contention of the Petitioner is concerned

that he should be regularized as other casual workers regularized under the scheme, it is settled law that any contract

workman has no right to seek regularization of employment from employer, since it is a matter of discretion of the

employer. Even otherwise, if a fresh contract contemplated to secure employee appointment with higher qualification

or seek a fresh job on contractual employment having more skills, the employer will always have an authority to

decide what is best for improving its functioning and which can be depend on work requirements.

14.

Petitioner contended that Respondent has mentioned that in the impugned order the record pertaining to

Railway Electrification Project are not available for due verification of the information furnished by the Petitioner.

As they have weeded out as per retention schedule. The letter of appointment and payment thereof is requisite record

2260

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 8, 2023/ASHADHA 17, 1945

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

to verify the engagement from 1.1.1994 to 30.9.1996. It is the duty of the authority to protect official files and

record, it would be worthy to mention here that Petitioner had worked as Mazdoor in Respondent project for the

period 1994-1996 as contract labour and he raised present industrial dispute by filing the petition u/s 2A(2) of the

I.D. Act, 1947 in July, 2012. Long span of time more than 15 years have elapsed. Respondent in his counter has

stated that no record as such are maintained after the expiry of three years relating to the muster roll as per the

retention schedule. Since there was gross latches of inordinate delay on the part of Petitioner in raising present

industrial dispute. Respondent is not supposed to maintain record of contractual labour beyond retention schedule.

Therefore, in the case of non-production of the record by the Respondent, no adverse inference can be drawn against

him in this case.

15.

Respondent submitted that there is no engagement of casual labour in BSNL after 1.10.2000 and the casual

labour who have been engaged before the imposition of the ban vide letter No.270/6/84-STN dated 30.3.1985 and

letter No.270-6/84-STN dated 22.6.1988 for the project circles and the line dismantling in the Electrification project

circles have been continued in BSNL as a matter of policy and the Petitioner having been engaged in Railway

Electrification Project after the imposition of ban in project circles vide letter dated 22.6.1988 is not covered by the

policy thereof and it is not open for the Petitioner to assert for reengagement or for regularization under the said

policy. The Respondent has submitted the copy of letter No.270/6/84-STN dated 30.3.1985 wherein it is mentioned

that the Telecom Department has directed to stop the recruitment or employment of casual labour of any kind, any

type of work. Further, copy of letter No.270-6/84-STN dated 22.6.1988 which is regarding casual labour recruitment

wherein it is mentioned (para 2) that, there shall be no recruitment of casual labour even for specific period and it was

directed to Respondent Department to engage from neighbouring divisions, employed for the project or

electrification work. Further, the copy of the letter of DG Telecom, New Delhi dated 7.11.1989 has been filed

wherein it is mentioned that the casual labourers could be engaged after 30.3.1985 in projects and Electrification

Circles only for specific works and on completion of the work the casual labourers so engaged were required to be

retrenched. It is also mentioned that as per the direction in letter dated 22.6.1988 fresh recruitment of casual

labourers even for specific works for specific periods in Projects and Electrification Circles also should not be resorted

to. Therefore, in view of the ban on engagement of casual labourers the claim of the Petitioner is not maintainable.

Since the Petitioner was engaged through contractor in the Railway Electrification Project which was meant for a

specific period and after completion of the project work his employment is terminated and he is not eligible to claim

for regularization in view of above letters and his status as contract labour.

16.

Now the question arises whether there existed employee and employer relationship between the claimant

and Respondent. Petitioner has admitted the fact that he was doing the work as a contract labourer in the Respondent

Department. Further, to prove the employment there has to be a strict evidence to show some nexus between the

claimant and the Respondent. This can be any kind such as appointment letter, monthly payment slip, deduction of

Provident Fund, payment of any dues, which can show that he was in the employment of the Respondent. In the case

of Automobile Association of Upper India vs. Presiding Officer Labour Court-II, 2006 LLR page 851 wherein

the Hon’ble Delhi High Court held, “ Engagement and appointment in service can be established directly by the

existence and production of appointment letter, a written agreement or by circumstantial evidence of incidental and

ancillary records which would be in the nature of attendance register, salary registers, leave records, deposit of

Provident Fund contribution and employees state insurance contribution etc.. The same can be produced and proved

by the workers or he can call upon and caused the same to be produced and proved by calling for witnesses who are

required to produce and prove these records.”

17.

But in the present case the claimant Petitioner has not produced any single piece of evidence showing that he

was issued appointment letter by the Respondent. In fact, he has not disclosed date of actual joining of the

employment as casual labour of the Respondent. Therefore, the contention of the Petitioner that he was casual

labourer is not found to be proved by his evidence. Hence, he was not covered under Regularization Scheme rather

he was contract labour as he has admitted in petition.

Thus, Points No.I & II are answered accordingly.

18.

Point No.III: In view of the above discussion, it is clear that the Petitioner was not a casual labourer,

rather had worked as contract labour for the period from 1994 to 1996. Therefore, Petitioner is not eligible to be

regularized as a casual labour in the Respondent employment. The impugned order dated 27.4.2010passed by

Respondent needs no interference and petition is liable to be dismissed. In view of the finding given in Points No.I &

II, the Petitioner is not entitled to any relief as prayed for regularization or reengagement. However, the

Respondent has submitted that this Tribunal has disposed of LC No.8/2012 vide its order dated 29.2.2020 and granted

relief of compensation to the Petitioner. Therefore, in view of the above, Petitioner is liable for getting the

compensation of Rs.50,000/.

Thus, Point No.III is answered accordingly.

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : िुलाई 8, 2023/ आर्ाढ़ 17, 1945

2261

ORDER

In view of the findings given above, it is hereby ordered: The petition of the Petitioner is allowed in part.

The Respondents are directed to pay a sum of Rs.50000/- (Fifty thousand rupees) to the Petitioner towards

compensation within four months from the receipt of this order, failing which the Petitioner is at liberty to take

appropriate steps according to Law.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the

7^th day of March, 2023.

IRFAN QAMAR, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the

Petitioner

Respondent

WW1: Sri Devambotla

MW1: Nil

Balachowdeshwara Sarma

Documents marked for the Petitioner

Ex.W1: Photostat copy of the Order dt 27-4-2010

Ex.W2: Photostat copy of the Representation of WW1 dt.3.3.2010

Ex.W3: Photostat copy of order passed in OA. No. 1229/2011

Ex.W4: Photostat copy of order passed in OA. No. 100/2010

Ex.W5: Photostat copy of order passed in CA. No. 101/2010

Ex.W6: Photostat copy of proceeding of respondent dt 9-5-2007

Ex.W7: Photostat copy of proceeding of Director, BSNL Railway Electrification Project Secunderabad dt. 12-9-2002

Ex.W8: Photostat copy of list of candidates issued by Div. Engineer, Secunderabad dt. 11-9-2002

Ex.W9: Photostat copy of proceeding Dt. 13-11-2007 providing information under RTI Act

Ex.W10: Photostat copy of letter dt.21-11-2000 with regard to temporary status

Ex.W11: Photostat copy of Days Book signed by authority

Ex.W12: Photostat copy of Identity card of petitioner

Ex.W13:Copy of reply filed in OA No.1229/2011

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

नई दिल्ली, 16 मई, 2023

का.आ. 1115.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 1947 dk 14 dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj पंिाब नेिनल बैंक izca/krarz ds lc) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V

औद्योजगक fookn esa औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k iVuk ds iapkV lanHkZ la[;k (15 (C) of 2018) dks izdkf'kr djrh

gS A

[सं. एल-12011/71/2018-आईआर(ch-II)]

सलोनी, उप जनिेिक

2262

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 8, 2023/ASHADHA 17, 1945

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 16th May, 2023

S.O. 1115.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (15 ( C ) of 2018 ) of the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Patna as

shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Punjab National Bank and their

workmen.

[No. L-12011/71/2018– IR(B-1I)]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, PATNA.

Reference Case No.:- 15 (C) of 2018

Between the management of (1) The Circle Head, Punjab National Bank, Circle Office, G.M. Road, P.O

Lalbagh, Darbhanga-846004 (2) The Manager, Punjab National Bank, Raj Nagar Branch, PO & PS: Raj Nagar,

Dist.- Madhubani, Madhopur (Pb.)547235 and their workman Shri Chandan Kumar, Part Time Sweeper through

represented by the President, Bank Employees Federation, Bihar, Saboo Republic, 2^nd Floor, Behind Republic Hotel,

Patna (Bihar) 800001.

For the management:-

Mrs. Preeti, Dy. Manager, HRD.

For the workman:-

Sri B. Prasad, President, Bank Employees Federation, Bihar.

Present:- MANOJ SHANKAR, Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Patna.

AWARD

Patna, dated- 14^th November, 2022

By the adjudication order no.- L-12011/71/2018-IR (B-II) New Delhi, dated- 16.11.2018 the Govt. of India,

Ministry of Labour, New Delhi has referred under clause (d) of sub-section-(1) and sub-section-(2A) of section-10 of

the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, ( hereinafter to be referred to as “the Act”), the following dispute between (1) The

Circle Head, Punjab National Bank, Circle Office, G.M Road, P.O Lalbagh, Darbhanga- 846004 (2) The Manager,

Punjab National Bank, Raj Nagar Branch, P.O- & P.S: Raj Nagar, Dist.- Madhubani, Madhopur (Pb.)-547235 and

their workman Shri Chandan Kumar, Part Time Sweeper through represented by the President, Bank Employees

Federation, Bihar, Saboo Republic, 2^nd floor, Behind Republic Hotel, Patna (Bihar)- 800001 for adjudication to this

tribunal:-

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Punjab National Bank, in not regularizing

service of Shri Chandan Kumar,

Part Time Sweeper allegedly working from 11.05.2016 at Raj Nagar Branch, Dist. Madhubani and

keeping him on daily wages since last 2 years, is justified? If not, to what relief the workman concerned is entitled

to?

2. After receipt of the reference / notification of this tribunal notices were issued to the both parties vide through

retrospective post accordingly both the paties appeared on 26.02.2019. The workman has been represented by Sri B.

Prasad of the said union. This tribunal further finds that on 28.03.2019 both the parties have filed their respective

pairvi at the same time the management side has also filed withdrawal application of the workman Sri Chandan

Kumar bearing the signature of the workman and the same be plalced before this tribunal by the management side.

This tribunal further finds that after withdrawal application made by workman, workman never appeared before this

tribunal and did not file any statement of claim. However, tribunal regularly directed to the workman to appear

before this tribunal and to file statement of claim., if any. But workman did not turn-up. Record also shows that both

parties became absent from 24.02.2020 to 28.11.2021 due to covid pandemic thereafter management side started

appearing in this proceeding but the workman side remained absent. This tribunal again issued notice to the workman

through registered post but he did not appear for the same. It has been submitted by the management side workman

has already withdraw his claim on 12.03.2019 that itself shows that the workman has no grievance at all and he has

no dispute with the management. This tribunal further finds that due to withdrawal petition filed by the workman

produced by the management side established this facts. Workman Sri Chandan Kumar has no dispute at all.

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : िुलाई 8, 2023/ आर्ाढ़ 17, 1945

2263

3. In view of the above aforesaid discussion this is a considered opinion of this tribunal since workman has no

dispute, hence this tribunal has no alternative but to pass “No Dispute Award” in this case. Thus this tribunal pass

“No Dispute Award” accordingly. This award is eff after date of publication in gazette.

This is my award accordingly.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

MANOJ SHANKAR, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 17 मई, 2023

का.आ. 1116.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 1947 dk 14 dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj यूनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंजडया izca/kतंत्र ds laca) fu;kstdkas vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k

esa fufnZ’V औद्योजगक fookn esa औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k iVuk ds iapkV lanHkZ la[;k (18 ( C ) of 2019 ) dks

izdkf’kr djrh gS A

[सं. एल-12011/38/2019-आईआर(ch-II)]

सलोनी, उप जनिेिक

New Delhi, the 17th May, 2023

S.O. 1116.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (18 ( C ) of 2019 ) of the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Patna as

shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of United Bank of India and their

workmen.

[No. L-12011/38/2019– IR(B-1I)]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, PATNA.

Reference Case No.:- 18 (C) of 2019

Between the management of (1) General Manager (HR), United Bank of India, Head Office, 11, Hemant

Basu Sarani, Kolkata-700001 (2) Chief Regional Manager, United Bank of India, Regional Office, Dr. Rajendra

Prasad Path, Station Road, Katihar (Bihar)-854103 and Their workmen Sri Kumar Manoj Anand & 4 others

represented through the Regional Secretary, Union Bank of India Employee’s Union, C/O- Rajendrapath Branch, P.K.

Bhattacharya Road, Patna, Bihar- 800001.

For the management:-

Sri Nand Mohan Das, Sr. Manager, P.N.B, Circle Office, Darbhanga.

For the Workman:-

himself present.

Present:- MANOJ SHANKAR Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal, Patna.

AWARD

Patna, dated- 31^st March, 2022

By the adjudication order no.-L-12011/38/2019-IR(B-II) dated- 18.11.2019 the Govt. of India, Ministry of

Labour, New Delhi has referred under clause (d) of sub-section-(1) and sub-section-(2A) of section-10 of the

Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, ( hereinafter to be referred to as “ the Act”), the following dispute between The

management of (1) General Manager (HR), United Bank of India, Head Office, 11, Hemant Basu Sarani, Kolkata-

700001 (2) Chief Regional Manager, United Bank of India, Regional Office, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Path, Station Road,

Katihar (Bihar)-854103 and Their workmen Sri Kumar Manoj Anand & 4 others represented through the Regional

Secretary, Union Bank of India Employee’s Union, C/O- Rajendrapath Branch, P.K. Bhattacharya Road, Patna, Bihar-

800001for adjudication to this tribunal:-

2264

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 8, 2023/ASHADHA 17, 1945

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of United Bank of India, Katihar Region, in denying

the pay fixation in respect of Shri Kumar Manoj Anand & 4 others (list attached), Ex-

Servicemen, re-employed by the Bank Management is justified? If not, to what relief the

workmen concerned are entitled to?”

2. After receipt of the reference / notification, notices were issued to the parties concerned. Management

appeared before this tribunal but neither workmen nor that representative appeared before this tribunal.

3. From perusal of the record, it appears to me that several notice were issued to the workmen concerned but

they never appeared before this tribunal, then registered notice was given to the concerned parties but notice returned

back in this tribunal with the endorsement union bank is not in Bhattacharya Road, Patna. Letter no.- 18.01.2022 sent

by the Sunil Kumar Goyal, General Manager, Punjab National Bank, Zonal Office, HRD, United Tower, 11, Hemanta

Basu Sarani Kolkata- 700001 which was received in this tribunal on 25.01.2022 mentioning therein that United Bank

of India has since been amalgamated with Punjab National Bank w.e.f 01.04.2020 and since the matter falls within the

jurisdiction of Bank’s Patna Zone, for further course of action in the matter, future correspondences may be made to

Punjab National Bank, Patna, Zonal Office situated at 2^nd Floor, Chanakhya Towers, ‘R’ Block Patna-800001. On

14.05.2020 representative of the management Sri Ved Prakash, Manager, Law appeared before this tribunal and filed

a written submission along with document on behalf of the United Bank of India, Katihar Region and submitted that

bank has already done fitment and fixation of the payment, and the same has also been communicated to the all the

following workmen as per index of schedule of the notification of reference. On 08.03.2022 Nand Mohan Das, Sr.

Manager appeared and filed a petition with application of Mr. Alok Ranjan, Ex-Servicemen, Mr. Sanjeet Kumar

working as SWO-A in Katihar, Smt. Kanchan Bharti, SWO-A and Mr. Manoj Anand, Ex-serviceman working as

SWO in Jhanjharpur Branch ( Darbhanga Circle ) stating therein that fitment of salary has been done by the bank so

they have submitted written petition for withdrawal of the above case.

4. Ultimately on 08.03.2022 representative of the management himself appeared before this tribunal and filed a

petition for withdrawal of the instant reference case because grievance of salary of ex-servicemen employee namely 1.

Kumar Manoj Anand 2. Sanjeet Kumar, 3. Kanchan Bharti, 4. Manoj Kr. Pandit has been redressal by the bank and all

the workmen are satisfied from their fitment of salary so they submitted written petition for withdrawal of the above

case and also make prayer to pass No Dispute Award.

5. Heard both the parties.

6. On the aforesaid basis one of the workman witness namely Sri Manoj Kumar Pandit appeared before this

tribunal as W.W-1 who deposed that he and four other workmen namely 1. Kumar Manoj Anand, 2. Sanjeet Kumar,

3. Kanchan Bharti, 4. Alok Ranjan, all the ex-servicemen have placed their grievance regarding their salary before the

bank and the same issue was raised before the conciliation officer but conciliation was failed than matter is referred

before this tribunal. Al the aforesaid workmen were working in United Bank of India later on the bank is merged in

the bank of Punjab National Bank. All the issues of the aforesaid workmen have been settled by the Punjab National

and now the matter is resolved by the Punjab National Bank. W.W.-1 also stated that no dispute exist regarding pay

fixation of all the concerned workmen. W.W.-1 further stated that all the workmen have filed application bearing their

signature before the Punjab National Bank for the withdrawal of the case as their grievance is settled by the bank.

7. In view of the aforesaid facts, & circumstances, this tribunal is of the view that the petition dated- 08.03.2022

filed by the management along with the applications of workmen regarding their redressal of pay fixation disputes and

submission as made above. This is the considered opinion of the tribunal “ No Dispute” exists, accordingly. “No

Dispute Award” is passed in the light of petition dated- 08.03.2022 filed by management and the evidence as placed

by the workmen. This award is effected after date of publication in gazette.

This is my award accordingly.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

MANOJ SHANKAR, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 25 मई, 2023

का.आ. 1117.—औद्योगिक गििाद अगिगियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अिुसरण में, केन्द्रीय

सरकार लेडी हार्डिंि मेगडकल कॉलेज और श्रीमती एसके अस्पताल, किॉट प्लेस, िई ददल्ली; सुरजा इलेगरिकल्स, सी/ओ

सुचेता कृपलािी अस्पताल, लेडी हार्डिंि मेगडकल कॉलेज, किॉट प्लेस, िई ददल्ली, के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध गियोजकों और श्री

प्रशांत कुमार, कामिार, के बीच अिुबंि में गिर्दिष्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अगिकरण-सह- श्रम न्द्यायालय-2 िई ददल्ली

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : िुलाई 8, 2023/ आर्ाढ़ 17, 1945

2265

के पंचाट (संदर्ि संख्या 74/2021) को जैसा दक अिुलग्नक में ददखाया िया है, को प्रकागशत करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को

सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 24.05.2023 को प्राप्त हुआ था l

[सं. एल-42025-07-2023-96-आईआर(डीयू)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 25th May, 2023

S.O. 1117.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 74/2021) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum

Labour Court - II New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

Lady Harding Medical College & Smt. S.K Hospital, Connaught Place, New Delhi ; Surja Electricals, C/o Sucheta

Kriplani Hospital, Lady Harding Medical College, Connaught Place, New Delhi, and Shri Prashant Kumar, Worker,

which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 24.05.2023.

[No. L-42025-07-2023-96-IR (DU)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II, NEW DELHI.

Present: Smt. PRANITA MOHANTY, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-Cum-Labour Court-II, New Delhi.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 74/2021

Date of Passing Award- 10^th May, 2023

Between:

Shri Prashant Kumar s/o Sh. Late Sh. Kishan Lal,

R/o C-72, Street No. 03, Gagan Vihar, Gokul Puri,

Delhi-110094…

….Workman

Versus

1 . Lady Harding Medical College & Smt. S.K Hospital,

604 , Shaheed Bhagat Singh, Marg, Connaught Place,

New Delhi-110002.

2. Surja Electricals,

C/o Sucheta Kriplani Hospital, Lady Harding Medical College,

604, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Marg, Connaught Place,

New Delhi-110002.

…..Managements

Appearances:-

Claimant in person.

Ms. Varsha Nagar, , Ld.A/R for the management no. 2 i.e Surja Electricals.

AWARD

This is an application filed u/s 2A of the Id. Act by the claimant wherein he has alleged illegal

termination with a prayer for reinstatement in service with full back wages and consequential benefits. Notice

being served, the mgt appeared through it’s A/R . When the matter was pending for framing of issues, a proposal

was advanced by the parties for amicable settlement. The matter was adjourned to 11.02.2023 for settlement

during the National Lok Adalat. Prior to that date on 10^th Feb.2023 the claimant gave a statement to the effect that

he has settled the dispute with the mgt and does not have any grievance against the mgt for which he wants to

withdraw the proceeding. In view of the said statement the matter was decided during the National Lok Adalat

held on 11.02.2023 and this no dispute award has been passed.

Hence ordered.

ORDER

The claim petition is dismissed for want of dispute raised by the claimant and this award is accordingly

passed.

2266

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 8, 2023/ASHADHA 17, 1945

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Send a copy of this award to the appropriate government for notification as required under section 17 of the

ID act 1947.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

PRANITA MOHANTY, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 31 मई, 2023

का.आ. 1118.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj ई.सी.एल. ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdkas vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k – सि – Je U;k;ky;] आसनसोल ds iapkV (एल. सी.

आवेिन la[;k 49/2015) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-05-2023 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-22013/01/2023-आईआर(सी.एम-II)]

मजणकंिन. एन, उप जनिेिक

New Delhi, the 31st May, 2023

S.O. 1118.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award ( L.C.Application No. 49/2015) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

E.C.L. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 30/05/2023

[No. L-22013/01/2023 – IR (CM-II)]

MANIKANDAN. N, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL

Present : Shri ANANDA KUMAR MUKHERJEE, Presiding Officer CGIT-cum-LC, Asansol

L. C. Application NO. 49 OF 2015

PARTIES : Lakhi Kanta Roy

v/s

Management of Ratibati Workshop of M/s. ECL

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the petitioner/appellant:

None appeared

For the Management of M/s. ECL: Mr. P. K. Das, learned advocate

INDUSTRY:

Coal

STATE :

WEST BENGAL

Dated :

21.04.2023

AWARD

1. This application under section 33 (C)(2) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 has been filed by the petitioner,

an ex-employee of Ratibati Workshop under Eastern Coalfields Limited, praying for an award in his favour for

directing the Agent, Ratibati Workshop of ECL to pay him the legal dues along with interest in respect of his quarterly

bonus arrear for the period from 01.01.2008 to 31.01.2010 amounting to Rs. 12,262.29, Exgratia/PPLB for the same

period amounting to Rs. 1,266.22, Earned leave wages for one day amounting to Rs 1,164.12, 2% Pension for arrear

wages from 01.01.2008 to 31.01.2010 amounting to Rs. 3,072.00 and less payment of Gratuity of Rs. 30.00 after

deducting a tax of Rs. 49,759 as the amount of Rs. 7,98,097.90 has already been received.

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : िुलाई 8, 2023/ आर्ाढ़ 17, 1945

2267

2. Initially, Mr. Gaya Prasad Mal, learned advocate appeared on behalf of the petitioner, Lakhi Kanta Roy.

The Agent, Ratibati Worksop filed a written statement opposing the contentions of the petitioner. It is stated in the

petition that Lakhi Kanta Roy has retired from the post of Foreman on 31.01.2010 and completed 40 years and 10

months of service. The petitioner was entitled to get Earn leave wages for 103 days also got one day of proportionate

leave for the month of January, 2010, i.e. total period of leave of 104 days in respect of which he has been paid the

Earned Leave wages in the revised scale of NCWA. It is denied on behalf of the Management that the petitioner was

entitled to 105 days of Earned Leave encashment as he was paid Earned Leave wages at the revised rate. Regarding

his claim of quarterly bonus and Exgratia it is the case of the Management that the payment of quarterly bonus and

exgratia has already been made to the workman following the rules and provisions. The case of the Management is

that the petitioner is not entitled to 2% of pension amounting to Rs. 3,072 as pension has already been settled and paid

to him in consonance with the Coal Mines Pension Scheme. According to the opposite party/Management of ECL, the

petitioner has been paid all legal dues along with his Gratuity amounting to Rs. 7,98,097.90 and in support of such

statement a calculation sheet has been enclosed.

In his affidavit-in-chief, Lakhi Kanta Roy has reiterated his claim made in his application filed

under section 33 (C)(2) of the Industrial Dispute Act. No oral evidence has been adduced by any of the party. By order

dated 06/02/2023 the Management of Ratibati Workshop was directed to file a statement of accounts in respect of

claims made by the petitioner. On 29/03/2023, the Agent, Ratibati Workshop filed the statement of accounts along

with supporting documents which has been admitted in evidence and marked as Exhibit M-1. On a perusal of

document it appears to me that quarterly arrear bonus amounting to Rs. 12304.60 has already been paid to the

workman through cheque no. 039141 dated 30.12.2013. Ex-gratia/PPLB amounting to Rs. 12460.00 has been paid to

him through cheque no. 942621 dated 11.10.2010. Earned Leave wages for 105 days including proportionate leave for

the month of January, 2010 amounting to Rs. 101688.60 has been disbursed to him through cheque no. 943846 dated

26.04.2010. Claim for 2% pension towards arrear wages is said to have been deposited before CMPFO and petitioner

is getting revised pension. The Management in support of their contention has filed an extract of PPO of Lakhi Kanta

Roy as Annexure D. Lastly, the statement of account discloses that gratuity dues of Rs. 798097.90 has been paid to

the petitioner through cheque no. 943845 dated 26.04.2010.

4. The petitioner has not turned up to controvert the reply made by the opposite party. Having considered the

case and counter case of the parties I am constraint to hold that the petitioner has already received his retiral dues and

is not entitled to get any further benefit as has been claimed by him. The application is found to be devoid of merit and

the same is dismissed on contest.

Hence,

ORDERED

that the application under section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Dispute Act filed by the petitioner has no merit

and the same is dismissed on contest. Let copies of the Award be communicated to the Ministry under section

33(C)(4) of the Industrial Dispute Act for information.

ANANDA KUMAR MUKHERJEE, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 7 िून, 2023

का.आ. 1119.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k

esa]dsUnzh; ljdkj बी.सी.सी.एल. ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k-सि-Je U;k;ky; नं. 1] िनबाि ds iapkV (lanHkZ

la- 63/2006) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 02-06-2023 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/209/2005-आईआर(सी.एम-I)]

मजणकंिन. एन, उप जनिेिक

New Delhi, the 7th June, 2023

S.O. 1119.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No.63/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

2268

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 8, 2023/ASHADHA 17, 1945

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

B.C.C.L. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 02/06/2023

[No. L-20012/209/2005-IR(CM-I)]

MANIKANDAN. N, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference: No. 63/2006

Employer in relation to the management of Kusunda Area of M/s. BCCL.

AND.

Their workman.

Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer.

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None.

For the workman. :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:- Coal

Dated 30/06 /2022

AWARD

By Order No.L-20012/209/2005-(IR(CM-I)) dated 01.06.2006 the Central Government in the Ministry of

Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section

10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demand of the Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union from the management of

BCCL, Kusunda Area that Sh. Ahzid Ansari, Tipper Driver be regularised as Haulpack

Operator justified? If so, to what relief is the workman entitled and from what date?”

2. The reference is received on 03/07/2006 by this Tribunal in which the Secretary, Bihar Colliery Kamgar

Union, Dhanbad had been advised to submit statement of claim along with relevant document within fifteen days but

the concerned union/workman did not appear before the Tribunal. However after receipt of the reference, both parties

were noticed but neither the concerned union/workman nor the management appeared before the Tribunal. Now Case

is pending since 03/07/2006 and workman/union as well as management is not appearing before Tribunal. so, it is felt

that workman/union has lost its interest in this matter. Hence “No Claim” Award is passed. Communicate

D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 23 िून, 2023

का.आ. 1120.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj ई.सी.एल. ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k–सि–Je U;k;ky;] आसनसोल ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k

07/2011) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 20-06-2023 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-22012/97/2010-आईआर(सी.एम-II)]

मजणकंिन. एन, उप जनिेिक

New Delhi, the 23rd June, 2023

S.O. 1120.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 07/2011) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : िुलाई 8, 2023/ आर्ाढ़ 17, 1945

2269

Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of E.C.L. and

their workmen, received by the Central Government on 20/06/2023

[No. L-22012/97/2010 – IR (CM-II)]

MANIKANDAN. N, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL.

Present: Shri ANANDA KUMAR MUKHERJEE, Presiding Officer C.G.I.T-cum-L.C., Asansol.

REFERENCE CASE No. 07 OF 2011

PARTIES: Ram Jatan Roy

Vs.

Management of Manderboni Colliery of ECL

REPRESENTATIVES:

For the Union/Workman: Mr. S. K. Pandey, Union representative.

For the Management:

Mr. P. K. Goswami, learned advocate.

INDUSTRY:

Coal.

STATE:

West Bengal.

Dated:

31.05.2023

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No. L-

22012/97/2010-IR(CM-II) dated 14.03.2011 and Corrigendum dated 23.08.2011 has been pleased to refer the

following dispute between the employer, that is the Management of Manderboni Colliery under Pandaveswar Area of

Eastern Coalfields Limited and their workman for adjudication by this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the Management of Management of Manderboni Colliery under

Pandaveswar Area of M/s. ECL in dismissing Shri Ram Jatan Roy Underground Loader,

UM No. 766126 w.e.f. 27.08.2009 is legal and justified? To what relief the workman is

entitled to? ”

1. On receiving Order No. No. L-22012/97/2010-IR(CM-II) dated 14.03.2011 and Corrigendum dated

23.08.2011 from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a Reference case

No. 07 of 2011 was registered on 25.03.2011 and an order was passed issuing notice to the parties through registered

post, directing them to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant documents in support of their

claims and a list of witnesses.

2. The case was fixed up on 23.05.2023 for appearance of the dependents of the workman and their proper

representation. Mr. P. K. Das, learned advocate appeared for the Management of Eastern Coalfields Limited. No steps

have been taken by legal heirs of Late Ram Jatan Roy, the dismissed workman. On repeated calls at 2:00 PM no

union representative from Colliery Mazdoor Congress (HMS) has turned up. Since no steps have been taken by the

legal representatives of the dismissed workman and union, the Industrial Dispute stands dismissed.

Hence,

ORDERED

that the Reference case is dismissed. An award be drawn up in the light of the above finding. Let copies of

the Award in duplicate be communicated to the Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India for

information and Notification.

ANANDA KUMAR MUKHERJEE, Presiding Office,

2270

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 8, 2023/ASHADHA 17, 1945

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 23 िून, 2023

का.आ. 1121.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj ई.सी.एल. ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k–सि–Je U;k;ky;] आसनसोल ds iapkV (एल. सी.

आवेिन la- 03/2012) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 20-06-2023 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-22013/01/2023--आईआर(सी.एम-II)]

मजणकंिन. एन, उप जनिेिक

New Delhi, the 23rd June, 2023

S.O. 1121.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (L. C. APPLICATION No. 03/2012) of the Central Government Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

E.C.L. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 20/06/2023

[No. L-22013/01/2023 – IR (CM-II)]

MANIKANDAN. N, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL.

Present: Shri ANANDA KUMAR MUKHERJEE, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T-cum-L.C., Asansol.

L. C. APPLICATION NO. 03 OF 2012

PARTIES:

Arjun Paswan, Sarjun Paswan, Bhim Paswan,

Nakul Paswan, and Arti Paswan

Vs.

(1) General Manager, Salanpur Ara, ECL,

(2) Agent, Mohanpur Colliery, ECL, and

(3) Manager, Mohanpur Colliery, ECL

REPRESENTATIVES:

For the Union/Petitioners: Mr. Ranjit Banerjee, union representative.

For the Management:

Mr. P. K. Das, learned advocate.

INDUSTRY:

Coal.

STATE:

West Bengal.

Dated:

22.05.2023

AWARD

1. This application under section 33 (C)(2) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 has been filed by the petitioners,

against opposite party members stating therein that the petitioners are dependents of Late Krishna Dusad who was

posted as Driller at Mohanpur Colliery of Eastern Coalfields Limited (hereinafter referred to as ECL) bearing U. M.

No. 167566. Krishna Dusad, father of petitioner no.- 1 worked at Mohanpur Colliery of ECL for more than twenty-

seven years and he died on 20.05.2000 while he was in service of the company leaving behind four sons and one

daughter as legal heirs. Petitioner No.- 1 is the eldest son of the deceased workman who used to look after petitioners

No. 2 to 5. Late Sumitra Devi, wife of Late Krishna Dusad died on 30.03.1996, prior to the death of her husband.

After death of his father, petitioner no.- 1 got employment under ECL and appointment letter was issued on

03.11.2001. It is the case of the petitioner that the Management of ECL is yet to pay his father’s dues such as

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : िुलाई 8, 2023/ आर्ाढ़ 17, 1945

2271

Quarterly Bonus of Rs.1,037.42/- ending with March 2000, Quarterly Bonus of Rs.335.76/- ending with June, 2000,

P.P.L.B. from 1999 to 2000 amounting to Rs.1,400/- and Final Arrear Wages as per National Coal Wage Agreement

(hereinafter referred to as NCWA) - VI amounting to Rs.42,947.33/-, which sums upto Rs.45,720.51/- along with

Interest of Rs.32,918.40/-, which is a total claim of Rs.78,638.91/- (Rupees seventy-eight thousand six hundred thirty-

eight and ninety-one paise only). It is urged that petitioner no.- 1 is entitled the said amount from ECL and claimed

that the Management should pay the said amount to petitioner no.- 1 immediately.

2. The Management filed objection against the claim of the petitioner and stated that the following dues of Late

Krishna Dusad have remained unpaid. According to employer company the unpaid amount is Rs.45,720.51/-. Further

case of the opposite party is that the ex-employee expired on 20.05.2000 while in service and his son got employment

in ECL in the year 2011. After death of Krishna Dusad, some amount had remained unclaimed due to absence of

proper nominee and legal heirs and the same was awaiting approval of the competent authority. Arjun Paswan filed

affidavit-in-chief on 17.12.2015 reiterating his claims in respect of outstanding dues of his deceased father and also

Interest of Rs.32,918.40/-. In the course of cross-examination claims of the petitioner was contradicted on behalf of

the Management of ECL which the witness has successfully rebutted. For reasons best known to the company the

hapless dependents of the deceased employee had to wait for eleven years before approval was actually accorded by

the competent authority. On the date of hearing of argument, petitioner no.- 1 was directed to produce No Objection

Certificate from other legal heirs and the Management to file Calculation Sheet or any Memorandum of Settlement in

respect of claims made by the petitioner.

3. On 02.05.2023 Arjun Paswan appeared in person accompanied by Mr. Ranjit Banerjee, Vice President of

West Bengal Khan Mazdoor Sangh (UTUC) and submitted that a settlement has been reached between Arjun Paswan

and the representative of the Management namely Subhas Chandra Mondal, Project Officer/ Agent, Mohanpur Group

of Mines, Salanpur Area and Dr. Bidhan Mukherjee, Assistant Manager (Personnel), Mohanpur Colliery, Salanpur

Area in presence of the union representative and witness of the Management. Memorandum of Settlement in Form

‘H’ in three pages has been filed. According to terms of settlement the unpaid arrear wages of Late Krishna Dusad

amounting to Rs.47,213.51/- which includes quarterly bonus of Rs.1,373.18/-, PLRS of Rs.2,893/- and unpaid wages

of Rs.42,947/- without any interest is payable to the L. C. Applicant, in consideration the petitioner agreed to

withdraw the L. C. Application No. 03 of 2012 filed before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour

Court, Asansol. It appears from the foregoing averments that the petitioner accepted the unpaid arrear wages of his

father without any interest and settled the matter. Along with the Memorandum of Settlement, a No Objection

Certificate was issued in favour of Arjun Paswan by the other legal heirs stating that the cheque amount may be paid

to their elder brother. A receipt relating to SBI Cheque bearing No. 767451 dated 27.03.2023 of Rs.47,213.51/-

(Rupees forty-seven thousand two hundred thirteen and fifty-one paise only) has been filed.

4. Having considered materials on record along with the No Objection Certificate and submissions made by the

union representative as well as Mr. P. K. Das, learned advocate for ECL, it appears to me that the subject matter has

been settled between the parties in terms of Memorandum of Settlement dated 21.04.2023. L. C. Application is

accordingly disposed of in terms of settlement in three pages. Let the terms of settlement be treated as part of this

Award.

Hence,

ORDERED

that the L. C. Application filed under section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Dispute Act is disposed of in the

terms of settlement dated 21.04.2023, treating the Memorandum of Settlement as part of the Award. Copies of the

Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour, Govt. of India, New Delhi under section 33 C (4) of Industrial

Dispute Act, 1947 for information and Notification.

ANANDA KUMAR MUKHERJEE, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 27 िून, 2023

का.आ. 1122.—औद्योगिक गििाद अगिगियम (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अिुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार

स्टील अथॉररटी ऑफ़ इंगडया गलगमटेड के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध गियोजकों और श्री बीरेंर कुमार ससंह के बीच अिुबंि में गिर्दिष्ट

केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अगिकरण एिं श्रम न्द्यायालय-1, ििबाद पंचाट (ररफरेन्द्स ि. -29/2017) को जैसा दक

अिुलग्नक में ददखाया िया है, प्रकागशत करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 27.06.2023 को प्राप्त हुआ

था l

[सं. जेड -16025/04/2023-आईआर(एम)-46]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

2272

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 8, 2023/ASHADHA 17, 1945

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 27th June, 2023

S.O. 1122.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Reference No. 29/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum

Labour Court-1, Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to

Steel Authority of India Limited and Shri Birendra Kumar Singh which was received along with soft copy of the

award by the Central Government on 27.06.2023.

[No. Z-16025/04/2023-IR(M)-46]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S (2A) (1)(2)of I.D. Amendment Act. 1947.

I.D No. 29/2017

Birendra Kumar Singh

Vill- Parashbaniya

P.O- Khas Jeenagora

Dist Dhanbad

…..Applicant

The General Manager

SAIL (Colliery Division)

Chasnalla Colliery

P.O- Chasnalla

Distt- Dhanbad

…..Opp.Party

Present :-Dr. S.K.THAKUR, Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Applicant :- Shri Birendra Kumar Singh ( In person)

For the Opp.Party :- Shri D.K.Verma, Advocate

State : Jharkhand.

Industry-Coal

Dated-: 27/04/ 2023

AWARD

One I .D Application of Sri Birendra Kumar Singh Vs General Manager (Colliery Division of M/S SAIL

is received U/S 2A (1)(2) of I.D Amendment Act 1947 and registered as I.D case No. 29 of 2017 as following dispute

for adjudication in this Tribunal;

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of M/S SAIL. in Terminating/ dismissing the

service of Sri Birendra Kumar Singh w.e.f 08.08.2017 is legal and justified? If not, to

What relief the concerned workmen is entitled to?”

2. The I.D case is received on 09.10.2017. After receipt of I.D, both Parties are noticed. After notice the

Opp.Party appears and files letter of authority, and subsequently workman left appearing before this Tribunal.

Thereafter he did not take any step in this case. Case is pending since 09/10/2017. Management is also not appearing

before the Tribunal.

3. Sri Birendra Kumar Singh , the Concerned workman appeared on 27.02.2023 and prayed for withdrawal of

the case registered as I.D case No. 29/17 by this Tribunal. He also referred to written petition filed dated 27.02.2023

for withdrawal of the case on personal ground.

4. Sri D.K.Verma Ld Advocate on behalf of the Opp. Party is present and submitted that the Opp. Party has no

objection as per the representation of the workman both in writing and before this Tribunal.

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : िुलाई 8, 2023/ आर्ाढ़ 17, 1945

2273

5. Considering submission from both side the application under referred I.D registered as I.D case No.29/2017 is

allowed to be withdrawn and No claim award is passed. Communicate.

Let copy of this award be sent to the Appropriate Government as required under section 17 of the I.D Act for

publication.

Dr. S. K.Thakur, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 27 िून, 2023

का.आ. 1123.—औद्योगिक गििाद अगिगियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अिुसरण में, केन्द्रीय

सरकार गबरला कॉपोरेशि गलगमटेड, गबरला सीमेंट िरसि, गचत्तौरिढ़ के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध गियोजकों और श्री शंर्ूलाल

मीणा, गचत्तौरिढ़ के बीच अिुबंि में गिर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक अगिकरण एिं श्रम न्द्यायालय, र्ीलिाड़ा, के पंचाट (ररफरेन्द्स ि.-

1/2016 एलसीआर) को जैसा दक अिुलग्नक में ददखाया िया है, को प्रकागशत करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी

के साथ 27.06.2023 को प्राप्त हुआ था l

[सं. एल-29012/1/2016-आईआर(एम)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 27th June, 2023

S.O. 1123.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Reference No. 1/2016 LCR) of the Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court,

Bhilwada as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to Birla Corporation

Limited, Birla Cement Works, Chittorgarh and Shri Shambhulal Meena, Chittorgarh which was received along with

soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 27.06.2023.

[No. L-29012/1/2016-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

अनुबंि

Jh lq'khy dqekj “kekZ

¼ftyk U;k;k/kh'k laoxZ½-

izdj.k la[;k % 1 lu~ 2016 ,y lh vkj

“kaHkwyky eh.kk iq= Jh HkS:yky eh.kk] fuoklh

&Mkcj jkorksa dh pkSdh] HksjMk jksM] pansfj;k] ftyk&fprkSMx<A

--izkFkhZ

dkj[kkuk izca/kd]fcjyk dkiksZjs”ku fy-]fcjyk lhesaV oDlZ]

ek/ko uxj] pansfj;k] ftyk]ftyk&fprkSMx<A

--foi{kh

mifLFkr %

Jh jes”kpUnz n”kksjk] vf/koDrk&izkFkhZ dh vksj lsA

Jh vkj-,l-pkSgku]vf/koDrk&foi{kh dh vksj lsA- -

fnukad 27-2-2023

izkFkhZ dks lsok i`Fkd fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa Hkkjr ljdkj dh vf/klwpuk la[;k% ,y&29012@1@2016&1

vkbZvkj ¼,e½ fnukad 8-2-2016 ds }kjk vxzfyf[kr fookn bl U;k;ky; dks iszf"kr fd;k x;k&

2274

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 8, 2023/ASHADHA 17, 1945

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

fookn izkIr gksus ij i{kdkjksa dks uksfVl tkjh dj ryc fd;k x;kA

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls Dyse izkFkZuk i= izLrqr dj tkfgj fd;k x;k fd mls foi{kh us vkns”k fnukad 15-10-

1996 ds }kjk vLFkkbZ Jfed ds :i esa gSoh bDohiesaV vkWijsVj ds in ij fu;qDr fd;kA rc ls og foi{kh ds

;gka fujarj dk;Zjr jgk rFkk le;& le; ij dkYifud xsi iSnk dj vyx& vyx fu;qfDr i=ksa ds ek/;e ls

mldh lsok vof/k c<kbZ xbZ rFkk fnukad 2-7-2014 rd og fu;fer :i ls dk;Zjr jgkA mldk dk;Z larks’kizn

jgk gSA mls u rks dHkh dksbZ uksfVl fn;k x;k] u vkjksii= fn;k x;k] u dHkh nafMr fd;k x;kA fnukad 2-7-

2014 dks fcuk fdlh vkns”k ds ekSf[kd :i ls mls lsok esa ysus ls budkj dj fn;k x;kA lsok i`Fkddj.k ls iwoZ

mls u rks dksbZ uksfVl fn;k] u uksfVl ds ,ot esa osru fn;k] u mls eqvkotk fn;k x;kA mlls dfu’B Jfed

dk;Zjr gS rFkk u;s O;fDr Bsdsnkj ds ek/;e ls j[ks tk jgs gSaA mldh lsok eqfDr vf/k0 1947 dh /kkjk 25&th

o ,p ds rgr voS/k gSA og lsok i`Fkddj.k ds ckn ls gh csjkstxkj gSA izkFkhZ us leLr osru ifjykHkksa lfgr

iqu% iwoZ in ij fu;ksftr djokus dh izkFkZuk dhA

foi{kh dh vksj ls izLrqr tokc esa ^izkjafHkd dFku^ ds :i esa ;g vafdr fd;k x;k fd izkFkhZ ds

dFkukuqlkj foi{kh }kjk mls fnuakd 2-7-2014 dks ukSdjh ls fudkyk gSA izdj.k ds fuLrkj.k gsrq ;g vko”;d gS

fd izkFkhZ fnukad 2-7-2014 dks fu;kstu esa gksA fnukad 2-7-2014 dks izkFkhZ ,oa foi{kh ds e/; Jfed&fu;kstd ds

laca/k ugha gksus ls ;g laHko ugha gS fd foi{kh }kjk izkFkh dks ekSf[kd vkns”k ;k vU; fdlh rjhds ls fnukad 2-7-

2014 dks ukSdjh ls fudkyk gksA le>kSrk vf/kdkjh ds le{k Hkh mRrjnkrk us ;g Li’V dj fn;k Fkk fd fnukad

2-7-2014 dks izkFkhZ foi{kh laLFkku ds fu;kstu esa dk;Zjr ugha FkkA fnukad 2-7-2014 dks izkFkhZ Bsdsnkj izgykn flag

ds ;gka dk;Zjr Fkk blfy, izkFkhZ dks fdl rjg ls lsok i`Fkd fd;k x;k ;g ek= Bsdsnkj }kjk gh Li’V fd;k

tk ldrk gSA izkFkhZ dks laLFkku esa vko”;drkuqlkj fuf”pr le;kof/k ds fy, fu;ksftr fd;k x;k FkkA mls

loZizFke fnukad 15-10-1996 ds vkns”k ls fnukad 16-10-1996 ls 3 ekg ds fy,] vkns”k fnukad 20-12-1996 ls

fnukad 20-12-1996 ls ,d ekg ds fy,] vkns”k fnukad 21-4-1997 ls fnukad 22-4-1997 ls 3 ekg ds fy,] vkns”k

fnukad 8-2-1999 ls fnukad 8-2-1999 ls ,d ekg ds fy,] vkns”k fnukad 9-3-2005 ls fnukad 10-3-2005 ls ,d

ekg ds fy, fu;qDr fd;k x;k rFkk vkns”k fnukad 7-4-2005 ls vLFkkbZ fu;qfDri= fnukad 9-3-2005 ds lanHkZ esa

,d ekg ds fy, fnukad 9-4-2005 rd c<k;k x;kA blds ckn mldk lsokdky ,d ekg ds fy, fnukad 9-5-

2005 ls vkxs c<k;k x;kA laLFkku ds vkns”k fnukad 25-5-2004 ls laLFkku esa fnukad 25-5-2004 ls ,d ekg ds

fy, gsoh bD;qiesaV vkWijsVj ds in ij fu;ksftr fd;k x;k] vkns”k fnukad 26-6-2004 ls vLFkkbZ lsokdky

fu;qfDri= fnukad 25-5-2004 ds lanHkZ esa ,d ekg ds fy, fnukad 26-6-2004 ls 25-7-2004 rd c<k;k x;k]

vLFkkbZ lsokdky fu;qfDri= fnukad 25-5-2004 ds lanHkZ esa ,d ekg ds fy, fnukad 26-7-2004 ls 25-8-2004 rd

c<k;k x;k] vkns”k fnukad 4-10-2004 ls laLFkku esa fnukad 5-10-2004 ls o fnukad 25-11-2004 ls ,d ekg ds

fy, gsoh bD;qiesaV vkWijsVj ds in ij fu;ksftr fd;k x;k] vLFkkbZ lsokdky fu;qfDri= fnukad 25-11-2004 ds

lanHkZ esa 15 fnu ds fy, fnukad 25-11-2004 ls vkxs c<k;k x;k] vkns”k fnukad 11-5-2006 ls fnukad 12-5-2006

ls o vkns”k fnukad 9-10-2006 ls 10-10-2006 ls ,d ekg ds fy,] vkns”k fnukad 27-5-2010 ls fnukad 27-5-2010

ls ,d ekg ds fy,] vkns”k fnukd 5-2-2011 ls fnukad 7-2-2011 ls 2 ekg ds fy, o vkns”k fnukad 20-9-2013 ls

fnukd 21-9-2013 ls rhu ekg ds fy, iw.kZ;k vLFkkbZ rkSj ij gsoh bD;qiesaV vkWijsVj ds in ij fu;ksftr fd;k

x;kA bl izdkj izkFkhZ dks vko”;drkuqlkj vLFkkbZ :i ls fuf”pr le;kof/k ds fy, fu;ksftr fd;k x;k FkkA

le;kof/k lekIr gksus ds lkFk gh izkFkhZ dk fu;kstu Hkh Lor% lekIr gksus ls Li’V gS fd og dHkh Hkh fu;fer@

LFkkbZ fu;kstu esa ugha jgk gS vkSj u laLFkku o izkFkhZ ds e/; Jfed &fu;kstd ds laca/k ugha jgs gSaA le>kSrk

vf/kdkjh ds le{k Li’V fd;k x;k Fkk fd izkFkhZ Bsdsnkj ds fu;kstu esa dk;Zjr Fkk vkSj Bsdsnkj izgykn flag

}kjk gh mls lsok ls i`Fkkd fd;k x;k FkkA le>kSrk dk;Zokgh ds nkSjku Bsdsnkj izgykn flag us mls l”krZ dk;Z

ij ysus gsrq izLrko fn;k ysfdu izkFkhZ us vuqfpr ykHk izkIr djus dh fu;r ls Bsdsnkj ds ;gka dk;Z djuk

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : िुलाई 8, 2023/ आर्ाढ़ 17, 1945

2275

Lohdkj ugha fd;k A izkFkhZ }kjk fnukad 20-12-2013 ds ckn tks Hkh dk;Z fd;k x;k gS og Bsdsnkj izgykn flag ds

fu;kstu eas gh fd;k x;k gS rFkk ml ij fu;a=.k Bsdsnkj izgykn flag dk gh jgk gSA izLrqr jsQjsUl esa izkFkhZ

foi{kh laLFkku ds fu;kstu esa ugha gksdj Bsdsnkj ds fu;kstu esa Fkk] dk dgha gokyk ugha gSA izLrqr jsQjsUl

vLi’V gSA izLrqr jsQjsUl esa ukSdjh ls fudkyus dh frfFk 2-7-2014 vafdr gS] ysfdu mDr frfFk dks izkFkhZ laLFkku

esa dk;Zjr gh ugha Fkk cfYd og ml fnu Bsdsnkj izgykn flag ds ;gka dk;Zjr Fkk vkSj Bsdsnkj izgykn flag }kjk

gh mls fnukad 2-7-2014 dks lsok ls i`Fkd fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ }kjk fnukd 16-4-2012 ls fnukad 1-1-2013 rd

vLFkkbZ :i ls eS0 oUMj lhesaV fy0 dh ekbZUl ij eS0 ohMh,p bdks ,uthZ ,aVjizkbZtst izk-fy0- ds ;gka dk;Z

fd;k gSA dyeokj tokc nsrs gq, tkfgj fd;k x;k gS fd izkFkhZ dks loZizFke fnukad 15-10-1996 ds vkns”k ls

rhu ekg ds fy, vLFkkbZ :i ls fu;ksftr fd;k x;k FkkA le;kof/k lekIr gksus gh mldk fu;kstu Lor% lekIr

gks x;kA blds ckn tc Hkh vko”;drk gqbZ izkFkhZ miyC/k jgk gS rFkk mlus vLFkkbZ rkSj ij fuf”pr le;kof/k

ds fy, vkdfLed izd`fr dk nSfud nj ls dk;Z fd;k gSA og laLFkku esa ^fu;fer fu;kstu^ esa ugha jgk gSA izkFkhZ

us fnukad 7-7-2014 rd dk Hkqxrku Hkh izgykn flag Bsdsnkj ls izkIr fd;k gSA og laLFkku esa fu;ksftr gh ugha

Fkk blfy, uksfVl nsus vkfn dh vko”;drk ugha FkhA izkFkhZ vf/k0 1947 dh /kkjk 25&,Q]th o ,p ds izko/kkuksa

dk ykHk izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA Dyse izkFkZuk i= fujLr djus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls lk{; esa ,M 1 “kaHkwyky] , M 2 gsejkt ds 'kiFki= ij c;ku ntZ djok;s x;s A

foi{kh dh vksj ls lk{; esa ,u , M 1 j?kquUnu nk/khp ds 'kiFki= ij c;ku ntZ djok;s x;s A

geusa nksuksa i{kksa dks lquk ,oa laiw.kZ i=koyh dk v/;;u fd;kA nksuksa i{kksa dh vksj ls fyf[kr cgl Hkh is”k

dh xbZA

cgl ds nkSjku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ us izkFkZuk i= esa mYysf[kr rF;ksa dks nksgjkrs gq, okfNr vuqrks"k iznku

fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kAblds foijhr foi{kh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us Hkh cgl ds nkSjku muds vfHkopuksa esa

mYysf[kr rF;ksa dks nksgjkrs gq, Dyse izkFkZuki= [kkfjt djus dh izkFkZuk dhA

izkFkhZ us viuk fu;kstu foi{kh ds ;gka fnukad 15-10-1996 ls vLFkkbZ Jfed ds :i esa gSoh bfDoiesaV

vkWijsVj ds :i esa gksuk crk;k gSA foi{kh us Hkh vius tokc dh en la0 ,d esa bl rF; dks Lohdkj djrs gq,

dgk gS fd izkFkhZ dks ek= rhu ekg dh le;kof/k ds fy, gh iw.kZr;k vLFkkbZ rkSj ij fu;ksftr fd;k x;k FkkA

bl rF; dks Lo;a izkFkhZ , M 1 “kaHkwyky us viuh ftjg esa Hkh Lohdkj fd;k gS rFkk ;g dgk gS fd ;g lgh gS

fd izn”kZ 1 esa eq>s vLFkkbZ :i ls fu;qDr fd;k tkuk vafdr gSA izn”kZ 1 dk voyksdu fd;k x;k] ftlesa Hkh

izkFkhZ dk vLFkkbZ :i ls o vko”;drk gksus ij dk;Z djus dk mYys[k fd;k x;k gSA fu;qfDr i= izn”kZ 2 esa

Hkh fu;qfDr iw.kZr;k vLFkkbZ gksus o vof/k iw.kZ gksrs gh fu;kstu Lor% lekIr gksus dk mYys[k gS] ftl ij izkFkhZ ds

fu;qfDr “krsZa Lohdkj djus ds laca/k esa gLrk{kj Hkh ekStwn gSa vkSj ftl rF; dks Hkh izkFkhZ 'kaHkwyky us viuh ftjg

esa Li’V :i ls Lohdkj fd;k gSA blds vfrfjDr izn”kZ 3 yxk;r izn”kZ 12 ,oa izn”kZ 15 yxk;r izn”kZ 18 Hkh

izkFkhZ ds vLFkkbZ :i ls fu;ksftr fd;s tkus ckcr fu;qfDr i= gSa] ftueas ls izn”kZ 3 o izn”kZ 4 ds }kjk izkFkhZ dh

lsokdky rhu&rhu ekg ds fy,] izn”kZ 5 yxk;r izn”kZ 10 ds }kjk mldk lsokdky ,d&,d ekg ds fy,] izn”kZ

11 ds }kjk mldk lsokdky 15 fnu ds fy,] izn”kZ 12 yxk;r izn”kZ 16 ds }kjk mldk lsokdky ,d ekg ds

fy,] izn”kZ 17 ds }kjk mldk lsokdky nks ekg ds fy, ,o izn”kZ 18 ds }kjk mldk lsokdky rhu ekg ds fy,

iw.kZr% vLFkkbZ rkSj ij c<k;s tkus o lsok vof/k lekIr gksrs gh mldk fu;kstu Lor% gh lekIr gksus dk mYys[k

gS] ftu lHkh ij izkFkhZ 'kaHkwyky ds lgefr ds gLrk{kj Hkh ekStwn gSaA ;s lHkh nLrkostkr izkFkhZ }kjk gh izLrqr

fd;s x;s gSaA izkFkhZ viuh ftjg esa Hkh ;g Li’V :i ls Lohdkj djrk gS fd ;g lgh gS fd eq>s le; fo”ks’k ds

fy, gh fu;qfDr i= fn;s x;s Fks A gkykafd vkxs ;g xokg dke fujarj djuk dgrk gS] ysfdu ;g xokg viuh

fu;qfDr fu;qfDri= esa vafdr le;kof/k ds fy, gksus ds rF; ls viuh ftjg esa budkj ugha dj jgk gSA vkxs

ftjg esa ;g xokg ;g Li’V :i ls ;g Lohdkj djrk gS fd ;g lgh gS fd eSa ftrus fnu dke djrk Fkk mrus

fnuksa dh etnwjh nsrs FksA izkFkhZ dk xokg , M 2 gsejkt Hkh vius eq[; ijh{k.k Lo:i izLrqr “kiFki= esa izkFkhZ

}kjk 15-10-96 ds vkns”k ij vLFkkbZ Jfed ds :i esa fnukad 2-7-2014 rd dk;Zjr gksuk Lohdkj djrk gSA bl

2276

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 8, 2023/ASHADHA 17, 1945

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

izdkj Lo;a izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr nLrkostkr o izLrqr lk{; ls gh ;g iwjh rjg ls lkfcr gS fd izkFkhZ dks foi{kh ds

}kjk vLFkkbZ rkSj ij fuf”pr le;kof/k ds fy, vko”;drkuqlkj fu;ksftr fd;k x;k Fkk rFkk le;kof/k lekIr

gksrs gh fu;qfDri=ksa esa vafdr 'krksZa ds vuqlkj mldk fu;kstu Hkh Lor% gh lekIr gks tkrk FkkA ,slh fLFkfr esa

izkFkhZ dk fu;kstu vf/k0 1947 dh /kkjk 25&ch ds rgr ^fu;fer fu;kstu^ dh rkjhQ esa vkuk lkfcr ugha ekuk

tk ldrk gSA

izkFkhZ us izn”kZ 19 yxk;r izn”kZ 27 ih-,Q- jlhnsa is”k dh gS] tks fu;qfDri=kas esa n”kkZbZ xbZ le;kof/k dh

gksuk Lo;a izkFkhZ viuh ftjg esa Lohdkj djrk gSA foi{kh xokg ,u , M 1 j?kquanu nk/khp us Hkh viuh ftjg esa

;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd ;g lgh gS fd gekjs ;gka dk;Zjr Jfedksa dh ih-,Q dh jkf'k dh dVkSrh gksrh gSA bl

izdkj izkFkhZ }kjk fu;kstu dh crkbZ tk jgh vof/k esa mldh Hkfo"; fuf/k ds en esa dVkSrh gksuk rks fufoZokfnr gS]

ysfdu dVkSrh gksus ek= ds vk/kkj ij gh mls foi{kh dk fu;fer Jfed gksuk ugha ekuk tk ldrk gS A blds

vfrfjDr izn”kZ 28 yxk;r izn”kZ 82 izkFkhZ dh is Lyhisa gSa]tks foi{kh }kjk tkjh dh xbZ gS] ysfdu Åij fd;s x;s

foospu ds vuqlkj izkFkhZ dk fu;kstu vkdfLed izd`fr dk gksdj iw.kZr% vLFkkbZ Fkk] tks fuf”pr le;kof/k ds

fy, vko';drkuqlkj Fkk rFkk le;kof/k lekIr gksrs gh izkFkhZ dk fu;kstu Hkh fu;qfDri=ksa esa vafdr 'krksZa ds

vuqlkj Lor% gh lekIr% gks tkrk FkkA vr% bl laca/k esa izkFkhZ dh vksj ls fd;s x;s rdZ Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX;

ugha gSA

bl laca/k esa foi{kh dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`’Vkar 2007 ,y ,yvkj 1260 ¼,l-lh-½ xaxkfdlku

lgdkjh fpuh fey fy0 cuke tSoh flag voyksduh; gS] ftlesa eku0 mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ;g fl)kar

izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS fd fu;kstu dh izd`fr dks lkfcr djus dk Hkkj Lo;a Jfed ij gSA izkFkhZ dk ,slk

vfHkopu ugha jgk gS fd mldk fu;kstu ^fu;fer fu;kstu^ gks] cfYd mlus Lo;a us vLFkkbZ Jfed ds :i esa

fu;ksftr gksus dk gh dFku fd;k gS rFkk mldk fu;kstu iw.kZr% vLFkkbZ gksuk Lo;a mlds }kjk izLrqr fu;qfDri=ksa

o mlds }kjk Dyse izkFkZuki= esa fd;s x;s vfHkopuks ls Hkh lkfcr gSA vr% mDr U;kf;d n`’Vkar gLrxr ekeys

esa iwjh rjg ls ykxw gksrk gSA mDr U;kf;d n`"Vkar dh jks'kuh esa Hkh izkFkhZ dk fu;kstu vf/k0 1947 dh /kkjk

25&ch ds rgr ^fu;fer fu;kstu^ gksuk lkfcr ugha ekuk tk ldrk gSA

odhy foi{kh dk cgl ds nkSjku rdZ jgk gS fd fnukad 2-7-2014 dks izkFkhZ muds laLFkku esa fu;ksftr

ugha FkkA vr% jsQjsUl esa lsok i`Fkdddj.k dh crkbZ xbZ frfFk 2-7-2014 dks mls lsok ls i`Fkd djuk laHko ugha

FkkA odhy izkFkhZ us bl laca/k esa U;kf;d n`’Vkar, vkbZ vkj 1981 ¼,l-lh-½ ist 1626 Hkh is”k fd;kA

mDr U;kf;d n`"Vkar dk lEeku iwoZd v/;;u fd;k x;kA mDr U;kf;d n`"Vkar dh jks'kuh esa bl laca/k

esa fopkj djsa rks izkFkhZ vius vfHkopuks o lk{; Lo:i izLrqr vius “kiFki= esa fnukad 2-7-2014 dks lsok i`Fkd

djuk dgrk gS] ysfdu i=koyh ij izn”kZ ,e 2&, Hkqxrku jftLVj dh izfr miyC/k gS] ftlds voyksdu ls

tkfgj gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ dks tks Hkqxrku fd;k x;k gS og fnukad 6-7-2014 rd dh vof/k ds fy, fd;k x;k gSA

mDr izn”kZ 2&, ij vius gLrk{kj gksuk Lo;a izkFkhZ viuh ftjg esa Hkh Lohdkj djrk gSA izkFkhZ dh vksj ls ,slh

dksbZ lk{; is”k ugha dh xbZ gS ftlls mls fnukad 2-7-2014 dks lsok ls i`Fkd djuk lkfcr gksrk gksA vr% izkFkhZ

dks foi{kh ds }kjk fnukad 2-7-2014 dks lsok ls i`Fkd djuk Hkh lkfcr ugha ekuk tk ldrk gSA

bl laca/k esa foi{kh dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`’Vkar , vkbZ vkj 1981 ¼,l-lh-½ ist 1626 eS0

Qk;jLVksu Vk;j ,aM jcj da0 cuke nh odZesu Hkh voyksduh; gS]ftlesa eku0 mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ;g

vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd jsQjsUl ls ijs tkdj U;k;ky; }kjk dksbZ fu’d’kZ ugha fn;k tk ldrk gSA mDr

U;kf;d n`’Vkar gLrxr izdj.k esa iwjh rjg ls ykxw gksrk gSA mDr U;kf;d n`’Vkar dh jks”kuh esa Hkh izkFkhZ dks

fnukad 2-7-2014 dks lsok i`Fkd djuk lkfcr ugha ekus tkus ls og dksbZ jkgr izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA

foi{kh dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`’Vkar 2000 ¼1½ lh ,y vkj ist 901 ujsUnz flag cuke jk ,aM

fQfuf”kax izksMD”ku oxSjg esa eku0 jkt- mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ;g vfHkfu/kZkfjr fd;k x;k gS fd ekSf[kd lsok

eqfDr dks Hkh leqfpr lk{; ls lkfcr fd;k tkuk vko';d gSA gLrxr ekeys esa izkFkhZ bl ckjs Lo;a ds c;ku

ntZ djk;s gSaA gkykafd mldh vksj ls , M 2 gsejkt dks Hkh crkSj xokg is”k fd;k gS ysfdu mldh lk{;

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : िुलाई 8, 2023/ आर्ाढ़ 17, 1945

2277

fo”oluh; ugha ekuh tk ldrh gS D;ksafd Lo;a gsejkt dk Hkh lsok i`Fkddj.k dk fookn bl U;k;ky; esa yfEcr

gS] ftlesa Hkh bl izdj.k ds izkFkhZ 'kaHkwyky us xokg gsejkt ds i{k esa lk{; nh gSA lsok i`Fkddj.k ckcr izkFkhZ us

Lo;a dh lk{; ds vfrfjDr fdlh vU; Lora= xokg dks Hkh vius leFkZu esa is'k ugha fd;k x;k gSA vr% mDr

foospu ds vk/kkj ij Hkh izkFkhZ vius lsok i`Fkdj.k dks Hkh lkfcr djokus esa vleFkZ jgk gSA

mDr lexz foospu ls ;g ik;k tkrk ga fd izkFkhZ] foi{kh dk vLFkkbZ Jfed Fkk] ftls fuf”pr

le;kof/k ds fy, foi{kh }kjk vko';drkuqlkj fu;ksftr fd;k x;k Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ dk fu;kstu Åij fd;s x;s

foospu ds vuqlkj vf/k0 1947 dh /kkjk 25&ch ds rgr ^fu;fer fu;kstu^ dh rkjhQ esa ugha vkrk gSA blds

vfrfjDr izkFkhZ dks foi{kh ds }kjk fnukad 2-7-2014 dks lsok ls i`Fkd fd;k tkuk Hkh lkfcr ugha ekuk x;k gSA

vr% og foi{khx.k ls dksbZ vuqrks"k izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA

vr% Hkkjr ljdkj }kjk iszf"kr fookn dk mRrj bl izdkj fn;k tkrk gS&

deZdkj Jh “kaHkwyky eh.kk iq= Jh HkS:yky eh.kk dks dkj[kkuk izca/kd] fcjyk dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM] fcjyk

lhesaV oDlZ] ek/ko uxj] pansfj;k] ftyk& fprkSMx< ¼jkt0½ }kjk ekSf[kd vkns”k fnukad 2-7-2014 ds }kjk ukSdjh

ls ugha fudkyk x;k gSA izkFkh dk fu;kstu ^fu;fer fu;kstu^ ugha FkkA izkFkhZ fdlh jkgr dk ikus dk gdnkj

ugha gSA

iapkV dh izfr Hkkjr ljdkj dks izdk'kukFkZ Hksth tk;sA

lq”khy dqekj “kekZ] U;k;k/kh'k

नई दिल्ली, 27 िून, 2023

का.आ. 1124.—औद्योगिक गििाद अगिगियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अिुसरण में, केन्द्रीय

सरकार गबरला कॉपोरेशि गलगमटेड, गबरला सीमेंट िरसि, गचत्तौरिढ़ के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध गियोजकों और श्री हेमराज पुत्र

श्री लालूराम मेिाड़ा, गचत्तौरिढ़ के बीच अिुबंि में गिर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक अगिकरण एिं श्रम न्द्यायालय, र्ीलिाड़ा, के पंचाट

(ररफरेन्द्स ि.-2/2016 एलसीआर) को जैसा दक अिुलग्नक में ददखाया िया है, को प्रकागशत करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को

सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 27.06.2023 को प्राप्त हुआ था l

[सं. एल-29012/2/2016-आईआर(एम)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 27th June, 2023

S.O. 1124.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Reference No. 2/2016 LCR) of the Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court,

Bhilwada as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to Birla Corporation

Limited, Birla Cement Works, Chittorgarh and Shri Hemraj S/o Shri Laluram Mewada, Chittorgarh which was

received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 27.06.2023.

[No. L-29012/2/2016-IR (M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

अनुबंि

ihBklhu vf/kdkjh %

¼ftyk U;k;k/kh'k laoxZ½-

izdj.k la[;k % 2 lu~ 2016 ,y lh vkj

Jh gsejkt iq= Jh ykywjke esokMk] fuoklh&d`’.kkuxj] -

2278

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 8, 2023/ASHADHA 17, 1945

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

HksjMk jksM]pansfj;k]ftyk& fprkSMx<A -

-izkFkhZ

dkj[kkuk izca/kd]fcjyk dkiksZjs”ku fy0] fcjyk lhesaV oDlZ] ek/ko uxj]

pansfj;k] ftyk]ftyk&fprkSMx<A

--foi{kh

Jh jes”kpUnz n”kksjk] vf/koDrk&izkFkhZ dh vksj lsA

Jh vkj- ,l- pkSgku] vf/koDrk&foi{kh dh vksj lsA- -

fnukad 27-2-2023

izkFkhZ dks lsok i`Fkd fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa Hkkjr ljdkj dh vf/klwpuk la[;k% ,y&29012@2@2016&

vkbZvkj ¼,e½ fnukad 8-2-2016 ds }kjk vxzfyf[kr fookn bl U;k;ky; dks iszf"kr fd;k x;k&

fookn izkIr gksus ij i{kdkjksa dks uksfVl tkjh dj ryc fd;k x;kA

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls Dyse izkFkZuk i= izLrqr dj tkfgj fd;k x;k fd mls foi{kh vkns”k fnukad 18-4-2007

ds }kjk vLFkkbZ Jfed ds :i esa gSoh bDohiesaV vkWijsVj ds in ij fu;qDr fd;kA rc ls og foi{kh ds ;gka

fujarj dk;Zjr jgk gS rFkk le;& le; ij dkYifud xsi iSnk dj vyx& vyx fu;qfDr i=ksa ds ek/;e ls

mldh lsok vof/k c<kbZ tkrh jgh rFkk fnukad 2-7-2014 rd og fu;fer :i ls dk;Zjr jgkA mldk dk;Z

larks’kizn jgk gSA mls u rks dHkh dksbZ uksfVl fn;k x;k] u vkjksii= fn;k x;k] u dHkh nafMr fd;k x;kA mls

fnukad 2-7-2014 dks fcuk fdlh vkns”k ds ekSf[kd :i ls mls lsok esa ysus ls budkj dj fn;kA lsok i`Fkddj.k

ls iwoZ mls u rks dksbZ uksfVl fn;k] u uksfVl ds ,ot esa osru fn;k] u mls eqvkotk fn;k x;kA mlls dfu’B

Jfed dk;Zjr gS rFkk u;s O;fDr Bsdsnkj ds dk/;e ls j[ks tk jgs gSaA mldh lsok eqfDr vf/k0 1947 dh /kkjk

25&th o ,p ds rgr voS/k gSA og lsok i`Fkddj.k ds ckn ls gh csjkstxkj gSA izkFkhZ us leLr osru ifjykHkksa

lfgr iqu% iwoZ in ij fu;ksftr djokus dh izkFkZuk dhA

foi{kh dh vksj ls izLrqr tokc esa ^izkjafHkd dFku^ ds :i esa ;g vafdr fd;k x;k fd izkFkhZ ds

dFkukuqlkj foi{kh }kjk mls fnuakd 2-7-2014 dks ukSdjh ls fudkyk gSA izdj.k ds fuLrkj.k gsrq ;g vko';d gS

fd izkFkhZ fnukad 2-7-2014 dks fu;kstu esa gksA fnukad 2-7-2014 dks izkFkhZ ,oa foi{kh ds e/; Jfed &fu;kstd ds

laca/k ugha gksus ls ;g laHko ugha gS fd foi{kh }kjk izkFkh dks ekSf[kd vkns’k ;k vU; fdlh rjhds ls fnukad 2-7-

2014 dks ukSdjh ls fudkyk gksA le>kSrk vf/kdkjh ds le{k Hkh mRrjnkrk us ;g Li’V dj fn;k Fkk fd fnukad

2-7-2014 dks izkFkhZ foi{kh laLFkku ds fu;kstu esa dk;Zjr ugha FkkA fnukad 2-7-2014 dks izkFkhZ Bsdsnkj izgykn flag

ds ;gka dk;Zjr Fkk blfy, izkFkhZ dks fdl rjg ls lsok i`Fkd fd;k x;k ;g ek=- Bsdsnkj }kjk gh Li’V fd;k

tk ldrk gSA izkFkhZ dks laLFkku esa vko';drkuqlkj fuf”pr le;kof/k ds fy, fu;ksftr fd;k x;k FkkA mls

loZizFke fnukad 18-4-2007 ds vkns”k ls laLFkku esa fnukad 19-4-2007 ls 2 ekg ds fy,] vkns”k fnukad 20-5-2008

ls laLFkku esa fnukad 20-5-2008 ls ,d ekg ds fy,] vkns”k fnukad 25-3-2009 ls laLFkku esa fnukad 25-3-2009 ls

14-4-2009 rd ds fy,] vkns”k fnukad 5-2-2011 ls laLFkku esa fnukad 7-2-2011 ls 2 ekg ds fy,] vkns”k fnukad

20-9-2013 ls laLFkku esa fnukad 21-9-2013 ls 3 ekg ds fy, gsoh bD;qiesaV vkWijsVj ds in ij fu;ksftr fd;k

x;kA bl izdkj izkFkhZ dks vko”;drkuqlkj vLFkkbZ :i ls fuf”pr le;kof/k ds fy, fu;ksftr fd;k x;k FkkA

le;kof/k lekIr gksus ds lkFk gh izkFkhZ dk fu;kstu Hkh Lor% lekIr gksus ls Li’V gS fd og dHkh Hkh

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : िुलाई 8, 2023/ आर्ाढ़ 17, 1945

2279

fu;fer@LFkkbZ fu;kstu esa ugha jgk vkSj u fnukd 20-12-2013 ds ckn laLFkku o izkFkhZ ds e/; Jfed&fu;kstd

ds laca/k ugha jgs gSaA le>kSrk vf/kdkjh ds le{k Li’V fd;k x;k Fkk fd izkFkhZ Bsdsnkj ds fu;kstu esa dk;Zjr

Fkk vkSj Bsdsnkj izgykn flag }kjk gh mls lsok ls i`Fkd fd;k x;k FkkA le>kSrk dk;Zokgh ds nkSjku Bsdsnkj

izgykn flag us mls l”krZ dk;Z ij ysus gsrq izLrko fn;k ysfdu izkFkhZ us vuqfpr ykHk izkIr djus dh fu;r ls

Bsdsnkj ds ;gka dk;Z djuk Lohdkj ugha fd;kA izkFkhZ }kjk fnukad 20-12-2013 ds ckn tks Hkh dk;Z fd;k x;k gS

og Bsdsnkj izgykn flag ds fu;kstu aesa gh fd;k x;k gS rFkk ml ij fu;a=.k Bsdsnkj izgykn flag dk gh jgk

gSA izLrqr jsQjsUl esa izkFkhZ foi{kh laLFkku ds fu;kstu esa ugha gksdj Bsdsnkj ds fu;kstu esa Fkk] dk dgha gokyk

ugha gSA izLrqr jsQjsUl vLi’V gSA izLrqr jsQjsUl esa ukSdjh ls fudkyus dh frfFk 2-7-2014 vafdr gS] ysfdu mDr

frfFk dks izkFkhZ laLFkku esa dk;Zjr gh ugha Fkk cfYd og ml fnu Bsdsnkj izgykn flag ds ;gka dk;Zjr Fkk vkSj

Bsdsnkj izgykn flag }kjk gh mls fnukad 2-7-2014 dks lsok ls i`Fkd fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ }kjk fnukd 16-4-

2012 ls fnukad 1-1-2013 rd vLFkkbZ :i ls eS0 oUMj lhesaV fy0 dh ekbZUl ij eS0 ohMh,p bdks ,uthZ

,aVjizkbZtst izk-fy0- ds ;gka dk;Z fd;k x;k gSA ^dyeokj tokc^ nsrs gq, tkfgj fd;k x;k gS fd izkFkhZ dks

loZizFke fnukad 18-4-2007 ds vkns'k ls 2 ekg ds fy, vLFkkbZ :i ls fu;ksftr fd;k x;k FkkA le;kof/k lekIr

gksrs gh mldk fu;kstu Lor% lekIr gks x;kA blds ckn tc Hkh vko';drk gqbZ izkFkhZ miyC/k jgk rFkk mlus

vLFkkbZ rkSj ij fuf”pr le;kof/k ds fy, vkdfLed izd`fr dk nSfud nj ls fd;k gSA og laLFkku esa ^fu;fer

fu;kstu^ esa ugha jgk gSA izkFkhZ us fnukad 7-7-2014 rd dk Hkqxrku Hkh izgykn flag Bsdsnkj ls izkIr fd;k gSA og

laLFkku esa fu;ksftr gh ugha Fkk blfy, uksfVl nsus vkfn dh vko”;drk ugha FkhA izkFkhZ vf/k0 1947 dh /kkjk

25&,Q]th o ,p ds izko/kkuksa dk ykHk izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA Dyse izkFkZuk i= fujLr djus dh izkFkZuk

dh xbZA

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls lk{; esa ,M 1 gsejkt] , M 2 “kaHkwyky ds 'kiFki= ij c;ku ntZ djok;s x;s A

foi{kh dh vksj ls lk{; esa ,u , M 1 j?kquUnu nk/khp ds 'kiFki= ij c;ku ntZ djok;s x;s A

geusa nksuksa i{kksa dks lquk ,oa laiw.kZ i=koyh dk v/;;u fd;kA nksuksa i{kksa dh vksj ls fyf[kr cgl

Hkh is”k dh xbZA

cgl ds nkSjku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ us izkFkZuk i= esa mYysf[kr rF;ksa dks nksgjkrs gq, okfNr vuqrks"k iznku

fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;Ka blds foijhr foi{kh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us Hkh cgl ds nkSjku muds vfHkopuksa esa

mYysf[kr rF;ksa dks nksgjkrs gq, Dyse izkFkZuki= [kkfjt djus dh izkFkZuk dhA

izkFkhZ us viuk fu;kstu foi{kh ds ;gka fnukad 18-4-2007 ls vLFkkbZ Jfed ds :i esa gSoh bfDoiesaV

vkWijsVj ds :i esa gksuk crk;k gSA foi{kh us Hkh vius tokc dh ^dyeokj tokc^ dh en la0 ,d esa bl rF;

dks Lohdkj djrs gq, dgk gS fd izkFkhZ dks ek= nks ekg dh le;kof/k ds fy, gh iw.kZr;k vLFkkbZ rkSj ij

fu;ksftr fd;k x;k FkkA bl rF; dks Lo;a izkFkhZ , M 1 gsejkt us viuh ftjg esa Hkh Lohdkj fd;k gS rFkk ;g

dgk gS fd ;g lgh gS fd izn”kZ 1 esa vLFkkbZ :i ls dk;Zjr gksus dk mYys[k gSA izn”kZ 1 dk voyksdu fd;k

x;k] ftlesa Hkh izkFkhZ dk vLFkkbZ :i ls o vko”;drk gksus ij dk;Z djus dk mYys[k fd;k x;k gSA izn'kZ 2 Hkh

izkFkhZ }kjk gh izLrqr nLrkost gS] tks foi{kh laLFkku }kjk tkjh fd;k gqvk gS] ftlesa izkFkhZ }kjk vLFkkbZ :i ls

fnukad 19-4-2007 ls 18-8-2007] 18-5-2008 ls 17-6-2008 o 7-2-2011 ls 6-8-2011 rd ¼11 ekg½ vLFkkbZ :i ls

dk;Z djus dk mYys[k gSA bl lca/k esa izkFkhZ ls dh xbZ ftjg ds nkSjku izkFkhZ us foi{kh ds bl lq>ko dks xyr

crk;k fd izn'kZ 2 esa mYysf[kr le;kof/k ds vykok mlus dke ugha fd;k gksA vkxs ftjg ds nkSjku izkFkhZ dgrk

gS fd ;g lgh gS fd bl ckcr eSaus dgha f'kdk;r ugha dh fd izn'kZ 2 xyr fn;k x;k gSA ftjg esa izkFkhZ ;g

Hkh Lohdkj djrk gS fd izn'kZ 3 ls izn'kZ 6 vLFkkbZ fu;qfDr i= gS] ysfdu ftjg esa vkxs og ;g dgrk gS fd

;g xyr gS fd izn'kZ 3 ls izn'kZ 6 esa eq>s vLFkkbZ fu;qfDr nh gksA xokg ftjg esa ;g Hkh Li"V :i ls Lohdkj

djrk gS fd chp&chp esa xsi gS] ysfdu og dke fujarj djuk dgrk gSA izkFkhZ ;g Hkh dgrk gS fd izn'kZ 3 ls

izn'kZ 7 ds ckjs esa f'kdk;r ugha dh fd xsi dh le;kof/k dk fu;qfDri= ugha fn;k tk jgk gS rFkk og ;g Li"V

:i ls Lohdkj djrk gS fd izn'kZ 3 ls 7 esa gekjk fu;kstu le;kof/k fo'ks"k ds fy, fd;k x;k FkkA izn'kZ 3 ls

izn'kZ 7 fu;qfDri=ksa dk voyksdu fd;k x;k] ftuesa fu;qfDr iw.kZr;k vLFkkbZ gksus o vof/k iw.kZ gksrs gh fu;kstu

Lor% lekIr gksus dk mYys[k gS] ftl ij izkFkhZ ds fu;qfDr “krsZa Lohdkj djus ds laca/k esa gLrk{kj Hkh ekStwn gSa

vkSj bl rF; dks Hkh izkFkhZ gsejkt viuh ftjg esa Hkh Li’V :i ls Lohdkj djrk gSA ;s lHkh nLrkostkr izkFkhZ

2280

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 8, 2023/ASHADHA 17, 1945

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

}kjk gh izLrqr fd;s x;s gSa vkSj izkFkhZ us viuh ftjg esa Hkh ;g Li’V :i ls Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mldk fu;kstu

le; fo”ks’k ds fy, gh fd;k x;k Fkk A gkykafd ftjg esa ;g xokg dke fujarj djuk dgrk gS] ysfdu ;g

xokg viuh fu;qfDr fu;qfDri= esa vafdr le;kof/k ds fy, gksus ds rF; ls viuh ftjg esa budkj ugha dj jgk

gSA izkFkhZ dk xokg , M 2 'kaHkwyky Hkh vius eq[; ijh{k.k Lo:i izLrqr “kiFki= esa izkFkhZ }kjk 18-4-2007 ds

vkns”k ij vLFkkbZ Jfed ds :i esa fnukad 2-7-2014 rd dk;Zjr gksuk dgrk gSA

bl izdkj Lo;a izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr nLrkostkr o izLrqr lk{; ls gh ;g iwjh rjg ls lkfcr gS fd izkFkhZ

dks foi{kh ds }kjk vLFkkbZ rkSj ij fuf”pr le;kof/k ds fy, vko”;drkuqlkj dk;Z gsrq fu;ksftr fd;k x;k Fkk

rFkk le;kof/k lekIr gksrs gh fu;qfDri=ksa esa vafdr 'krksZa ds vuqlkj mldk fu;kstu Hkh Lor% gh lekIr gks tkrk

FkkA izn'kZ 2 izkFkhZ }kjk gh izLrqr nLrkost gS] tks foi{kh laLFkku }kjk fnukad 24-8-2012 dk tkjh fd;k gqvk gS]

ftlesa izkFkhZ }kjk vLFkkbZ :i ls fnukad 19-4-2007 ls 18-8-2007] 18-5-2008 ls 17-6-2008 o 7-2-2011 ls 6-8-

2011 rd ¼11 ekg½ vLFkkbZ :i ls dk;Z djus dk mYys[k gSA blds ckn dh vof/k dk fu;qfDr i= izn'kZ 7] tks

fnukd 20-9-2013 dk tkjh'kqnk gS] ftls izkFkhZ }kjk is'k fd;k x;k gS] ftlds }kjk izkFkhZ dks fnukad 21-9-2013 ls

rhu ekg ds fy, iw.kZr% vLFkkbZ rkSj ij fu;ksftr fd;k x;k gSA mDr lHkh nLrkostkr izkFkhZ }kjk gh is'k fd;s

x;s gSa] ftuds vuqlkj izkFkhZ }kjk fujarj o fu;fer :i ls foi{kh ds v/khu dk;Z djuk izdV ugha gksrk gS rFkk

dk;kZof/k esa chp& chp esa xsi gksuk Lo;a izkFkhZ Hkh viuh ftjg esa Li"V :i ls Lohdkj djrk gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa

izkFkhZ dk fu;kstu vf/k0 1947 dh /kkjk 25&ch ds rgr ^fu;fer fu;kstu^ dh rkjhQ esa vkuk lkfcr ugha ekuk

tk ldrk gSA

izkFkhZ us izn”kZ 8 yxk;r izn”kZ 12 ih-,Q- ifpZ;ka o jlhnsa is”k dh gS] tks fu;qfDri=kas esa n”kkZbZ xbZ

le;kof/k dh gksuk izrhr gks jgk gSA foi{kh xokg ,u , M 1 j?kquanu nk/khp us Hkh viuh ftjg esa ;g Lohdkj

fd;k gS fd ;g lgh gS fd gekjs ;gka dk;Zjr Jfedksa dh ih-,Q dh jkf'k dh dVkSrh gksrh gSA bl izdkj izkFkhZ

}kjk fu;kstu dh crkbZ tk jgh vof/k esa mldh Hkfo"; fuf/k ds en esa dVkSrh gksuk rks fufoZokfnr gS] ysfdu

dVkSrh gksus ek= ds vk/kkj ij gh mls foi{kh dk fu;fer Jfed gksuk ugha ekuk tk ldrk gS A blds vfrfjDr

izn”kZ 13 yxk;r izn”kZ 34 izkFkhZ dh is Lyhisa gSa]tks foi{kh }kjk tkjh dh xbZ gS] ysfdu Åij fd;s x;s foospu ds

vuqlkj izkFkhZ dk fu;kstu vkdfLed izd`fr dk gksdj iw.kZr% vLFkkbZ Fkk] tks fuf”pr le;kof/k ds fy,

vko';drkuqlkj Fkk rFkk le;kof/k lekIr gksrs gh izkFkhZ dk fu;kstu Hkh fu;qfDri=ksa esa vafdr 'krksZa ds vuqlkj

Lor% gh lekIr% gks tkrk FkkA vr% bl laca/k esa izkFkhZ dh vksj ls fd;s x;s rdZ Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha gSA

bl laca/k esa foi{kh dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`’Vkar 2007 ,y ,y vkj 1260 ¼,l-lh-½ xaxkfdlku

lgdkjh phuh fey fy0 cuke tSoh flag voyksduh; gS] ftlesa eku0 mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ;g fl)kar

izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS fd fu;kstu dh izd`fr dks lkfcr djus dk Hkkj Lo;a Jfed ij gSA izkFkhZ dk ,slk

vfHkopu ugha jgk gS fd mldk fu;kstu ^fu;fer fu;kstu^ gks] cfYd mlus Lo;a us vLFkkbZ Jfed ds :i esa

fu;ksftr gksus dk gh dFku fd;k gS rFkk mldk fu;kstu iw.kZr% vLFkkbZ gksuk Lo;a mlds }kjk izLrqr fu;qfDri=ksa

o mlds }kjk Dyse izkFkZuki= esa fd;s x;s vfHkopuks ls Hkh lkfcr gSA vr% mDr U;kf;d n`’Vkar gLrxr ekeys

esa iwjh rjg ls ykxw gksrk gSA mDr U;kf;d n`"Vkar dh jks'kuh esa Hkh izkFkhZ dk fu;kstu vf/k0 1947 dh /kkjk

25&ch ds rgr ^fu;fer fu;kstu^ gksuk lkfcr ugha ekuk tk ldrk gSA

odhy foi{kh dk cgl ds nkSjku rdZ jgk gS fd fnukad 2-7-2014 dks izkFkhZ muds laLFkku esa fu;ksftr

ugha FkkA vr% jsQjsUl esa lsok i`Fkdddj.k dh crkbZ xbZ frfFk 2-7-2014 dks mls lsok ls i`Fkd djuk laHko ugha

FkkA odhy izkFkhZ us bl laca/k esa U;kf;d n`’Vkar, vkbZ vkj 1981 ¼,l-lh-½ ist 1626 Hkh is”k fd;kA

mDr U;kf;d n`"Vkar dk lEeku iwoZd v/;;u fd;k x;kA mDr U;kf;d n`"Vkar dh jks'kuh esa bl laca/k

esa fopkj djsa rks izkFkhZ vius vfHkopuks o lk{; Lo:i izLrqr vius “kiFki= esa fnukad 2-7-2014 dks lsok i`Fkd

djuk dgrk gS] ysfdu i=koyh ij izn”kZ ,e 2&, Hkqxrku jftLVj dh izfr miyC/k gS] ftlds voyksdu ls

tkfgj gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ dks tks Hkqxrku fd;k x;k gS og fnukad 7-7-2014 rd dh vof/k ds fy, fd;k x;k gSA

mDr izn”kZ 2&, ij vius gLrk{kj gksuk Lo;a izkFkhZ viuh ftjg esa Hkh Lohdkj djrk gS rFkk ;g dgrk gS fd ;g

dguk xyr gS fd izn'kZ ,e 2 ds tfj;s eSaus fnukad 1-7-2014 ls 6-7-2014 rd 6 fnu dk osru izkIr fd;k gks]

ysfdu vkxs ftjg esa ;g xokg Li"V :i ls dgrk gS fd osru daiuh ds LFkkbZ vkneh us fn;k FkkA ,slh fLFkfr

esa izkFkhZ }kjk fnukad 6-7-2014 rd dk osru izkIr djuk Lohd`r rF; gSA vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa izkFkhZ }kjk fnukad

2-7-2014 dks foi{kh ds ;gka dk;Z djuk fufoZokfnr gSA izkFkhZ dh vksj ls ,slh dksbZ lk{; is”k ugha dh xbZ gS

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : िुलाई 8, 2023/ आर्ाढ़ 17, 1945

2281

ftlls mls foi{kh }kjk fnukad 2-7-2014 dks lsok ls i`Fkd djuk lkfcr gksrk gksA vr% izkFkhZ dks foi{kh ds }kjk

fnukad 2-7-2014 dks lsok ls i`Fkd djuk Hkh lkfcr ugha ekuk tk ldrk gSA

bl laca/k esa foi{kh dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`’Vkar , vkbZ vkj 1981 ¼,l-lh-½ ist 1626 eS0

Qk;jLVksu Vk;j ,aM jcj da0 cuke nh odZesu Hkh voyksduh; gS]ftlesa eku0 mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ;g

vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd jsQjsUl ls ijs tkdj U;k;ky; }kjk dksbZ fu’d’kZ ugha fn;k tk ldrk gSA mDr

U;kf;d n`’Vkar gLrxr izdj.k esa iwjh rjg ls ykxw gksrk gSA mDr U;kf;d n`’Vkar dh jks”kuh esa Hkh izkFkhZ dks

fnukad 2-7-2014 dks lsok i`Fkd djuk lkfcr ugha ekus tkus ls og dksbZ jkgr izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA

foi{kh dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`’Vkar 2000 ¼1½ lh ,y vkj ist 901 ujsUnz flag cuke jk ,aM

fQfuf”kax izksMD”ku oxSjg esa eku0 jkt- mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ;g vfHkfu/kZkfjr fd;k x;k gS fd ekSf[kd lsok

eqfDr dks Hkh leqfpr lk{; ls lkfcr fd;k tkuk vko';d gSA gLrxr ekeys esa izkFkhZ bl ckjs Lo;a ds c;ku

ntZ djk;s gSaA gkykafd mldh vksj ls , M 2 'kaHkwyky dks Hkh crkSj xokg is”k fd;k gS ysfdu mldh lk{;

fo”oluh; ugha ekuh tk ldrh gS D;ksafd Lo;a 'kaHkwyky dk Hkh lsok i`Fkddj.k dk fookn bl U;k;ky; esa

yfEcr gS] ftlesa Hkh bl izdj.k ds izkFkhZ gsejkt us xokg 'kaHkwyky ds i{k esa lk{; nh gSA lsok i`Fkddj.k ckcr

izkFkhZ us Lo;a dh lk{; ds vfrfjDr fdlh vU; Lora= xokg dks Hkh vius leFkZu esa is'k ugha fd;k x;k gSA vr%

mDr foospu ds vk/kkj ij Hkh izkFkhZ fnukad 2-7-2014 dks vius lsok i`Fkdj.k dks Hkh lkfcr djokus esa vleFkZ

jgk gSA

mDr lexz foospu ls ;g ik;k tkrk gaS fd izkFkhZ] foi{kh dk vLFkkbZ Jfed Fkk] ftls fuf”pr

le;kof/k ds fy, foi{kh }kjk vko';drkuqlkj fu;ksftr fd;k x;k Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ dk fu;kstu Åij fd;s x;s

foospu ds vuqlkj vf/k0 1947 dh /kkjk 25&ch ds rgr ^fu;fer fu;kstu^ dh rkjhQ esa ugha vkrk gSA blds

vfrfjDr izkFkhZ dks foi{kh ds }kjk fnukad 2-7-2014 dks lsok ls i`Fkd fd;k tkuk Hkh lkfcr ugha ekuk x;k gSA

vr% og foi{kh ls dksbZ vuqrks"k izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA

vr% Hkkjr ljdkj }kjk iszf"kr fookn dk mRrj bl izdkj fn;k tkrk gS&

deZdkj Jh gsejkt iq= Jh ykywjke esokMk dks dkj[kkuk izca/kd] fcjyk dkWiksZjs”ku fyfeVsM] fcjyk

lhesaV oDlZ] ek/ko uxj] pansfj;k] ftyk& fprkSMx< ¼jkt0½ }kjk ekSf[kd vkns”k fnukad 2-7-2014 ds }kjk ukSdjh

ls ugha fudkyk x;k gSA izkFkh dk fu;kstu ^fu;fer fu;kstu^ ugha FkkA izkFkhZ fdlh jkgr dk ikus dk gdnkj

ugha gSA

iapkV dh izfr Hkkjr ljdkj dks izdk'kukFkZ Hksth tk;sA

lq”khy dqekj “kekZ] U;k;k/kh'k

नई दिल्ली, 27 िून, 2023

का.आ. 1125.—औद्योगिक गििाद अगिगियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अिुसरण में, केन्द्रीय

सरकार सहंदुस्ताि सजंक गलगमटेड, रामपुरा-आिुचा माईन्द्स, र्ीलिाड़ा के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध गियोजकों और श्री र्ंिरलाल

मीणा पुत्र श्री रामचंर मीणा, र्ीलिाड़ा के बीच अिुबंि में गिर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक अगिकरण एिं श्रम न्द्यायालय, र्ीलिाड़ा,

पंचाट के (ररफरेन्द्स ि.- 6/2019 एलसीआर) को जैसा दक अिुलग्नक में ददखाया िया है, को प्रकागशत करती है जो केन्द्रीय

सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 27.06.2023 को प्राप्त हुआ था l

[सं. जेड -16025/04/2023-आईआर(एम)-25]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 27th June, 2023

S.O. 1125.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Reference No. 6/2019 LCR) of the Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court,

Bhilwada as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to Hindustan Zinc

Limited, Rampura-Aghucha Mines, Bhilwada and Shri Bhanwarlal Meena S/o Shri Ramchandra Meena, Bhilwada

which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 27.06.2023.

[No. Z-16025/04/2023-IR(M)-25]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

2282

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 8, 2023/ASHADHA 17, 1945

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

अनुबंि

Jh lq'khy dqekj 'kekZ]-¼ftyk U;k;k/kh'k laoxZ½

izdj.k la[;k % 6 @2019 ,y- lh- vkj

Jh Hkaojyky eh.kk iq= Jh jkepUnz eh.kk],&11] d`".kk uxj]gqjMk jksM]xqykciqjk]

rg0&gqjMk]ftyk&HkhyokMk ¼jkt0½

-- izkFkhZ

% cuke %

MkbZjsDVj] fgUnqLrku ftad fy0]jkeiqjk&vkxqpk ekbZUl]

ftyk&HkhyokMk¼jkt0½A

--foi{kh@fu;kstd

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ughaA -

foi{kh dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ughaA

fnukad 10-2-2023

Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=ky;] Hkkjr ljdkj dh vf/klwpuk dzekad%,Q ua0 , ts&8@2@44@2019&vkbZ-vkj-

fnukad 24-10-2019 ds }kjk fuEu fookn bl U;k;ky; dks vf/kfu.kZ;kFkZ izsf"kr fd;k x;k&

'Whether the action of the management of Hindusthan Zinc Limited, Rampura Agucha

Mines,Rampura, Disst. Bhilwara in giving premature retirement to shri Bhanwarlal

Meena S/O Shri Ramchandra Meena, Mechanic at the age of 58 years w.e.f. 30.6.2019

instead of 60 years is legal and justified? If not ,whether the demand of the workman

forhis reinstatement up to age of 60 years or payment of wages, allowance and other

benefits for 02 years is legal and justified ? If yes, towhat relief the concerned workman is

entitled and from which date.

vkt izkFkhZ gkftj ugha gSa A izkFkhZ dh rkehy mlds irs ij jftLVMZ Mkd ls Hksth tk pqdh gSA rkehy

Hksts ,d ekg ls vf/kd dh le;kof/k Hkh O;rhr gks xbZ gSA rkehy vne rkehy Hkh ugha ykSVh gSA izkFkhZ vkt

ckotwn rkehy gkftj ugha gSA vr% ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ dh bl izdj.k esa dksbZ :fp ugha gS rFkk vc

og bl izdj.k esa dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha pkgrk gSA vr% ^dksbZ fookn ugha jgk^ vk'k; dk iapkV tkjh fd;k tkrk

gSA

iapkV dh izfr dsUnz ljdkj dks izdk'kukFkZ Hksth tk;sA

lq'khy dqekj 'kekZ] U;k;k/kh'k

नई दिल्ली, 27 िून, 2023

का.आ. 1126.—औद्योगिक गििाद अगिगियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अिुसरण में, केन्द्रीय

सरकार आर. बी.माइसिंि एंड कंपिी, र्ीलिाड़ा के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध गियोजकों और खाि मज़दूर कांग्रेस, र्ीलिाड़ा के

बीच अिुबंि में गिर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक अगिकरण एिं श्रम न्द्यायालय, र्ीलिाड़ा, के पंचाट (ररफरेन्द्स ि.- 1/2021 एलसीआर)

को जैसा दक अिुलग्नक में ददखाया िया है, को प्रकागशत करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ

27.04.2023 को प्राप्त हुआ था l

[सं. एल-42011/130/2020-आईआर(डीयू)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : िुलाई 8, 2023/ आर्ाढ़ 17, 1945

2283

New Delhi, the 27th June, 2023

S.O. 1126.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Reference No. 1/2021 LCR) of the Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court,

Bhilwada as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to R.B. Mining and

Company, Bhilwada and Khan Mazdoor Congress, Bhilwada which was received along with soft copy of the award

by the Central Government on 27.06.2023.

[No. L-42011/130/2020-IR(DU)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

अनुबंि

ihBklhu vf/kdkjh%

-¼ftyk U;k;k/kh'k laoxZ½

izdj.k la[;k % 1 @2021 ,y-lh-vkj

la;qDr lfpo] [kku etnwj dkaxzsl]

xka/kh etnwj lsoky;] HkhyokMk ¼jkt0½

-- izkFkhZ@;wfu;u

eSustj] vkj- ch- ekbZfuax ,aM daiuh]

vksedkiqjk] iks0&xgqayh]

rg0&dksVMh] ftyk&HkhyokMk¼jkt0½A

-- foi{kh@fu;kstd

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ughaA -

foi{kh dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ughaA

fnukad 27-1-2023

Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=ky;]Hkkjr ljdkj dh vf/klwpuk dzekad%,Q ua0 ,y&42011@130@2020&vkbZ-vkj-

¼Mh;w½ fnukad 16-12-2020 ds }kjk fuEu fookn bl U;k;ky; dks vf/kfu.kZ;kFkZ izsf"kr fd;k x;k&

'Whether the action of the management of M/S R.B.Mining & Company as regards

termination 0f shri Nola S/O Sh Rajulal Gurjar W.r.f. 16.05.2020 as raised by Khan

Majdoor Congress, Bhilwara vide letter dated 19-7-2020 is proper , legal and justified? If

not, then to what relif the concerned worker is entitled ? What direction, if any, is

necessary in the matter?'.

fookn izkIr gksus ij i{kdkjksa dks uksfVl tkjh dj ryc fd;k x;kA

vkt izkFkhZ gkftj ugha gSa A izkFkhZ dh rkehy Jfed la?k ds izfrfuf/k dks gks pqdh gSA izkFkhZ ;k mlds

izfrfuf/k vkt ckotwn rkehy gkftj ugha gSA vr% ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ dh bl izdj.k esa dksbZ :fp ugha

gS rFkk vc og bl izdj.k esa dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha pkgrk gSA vr% ^dksbZ fookn ugha jgk^ vk'k; dk iapkV tkjh

fd;k tkrk gSA

iapkV dh izfr dsUnz ljdkj dks izdk'kukFkZ Hksth tk;sA

lq'khy dqekj 'kekZ] U;k;k/kh'k

2284

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 8, 2023/ASHADHA 17, 1945

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 27 िून, 2023

का.आ. 1127.—औद्योगिक गििाद अगिगियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अिुसरण में, केन्द्रीय

बीच अिुबंि में गिर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक अगिकरण एिं श्रम न्द्यायालय, र्ीलिाड़ा, पंचाट के (ररफरेन्द्स ि.- 2/2021 एलसीआर)

27.06.2023 को प्राप्त हुआ था l

[सं. एल-29011/10/2020-आईआर(एम)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 27th June, 2023

S.O. 1127.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Reference No. 2/2021 LCR) of the Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court,

Bhilwada as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to R.B. Mining and

Company, Bhilwada and Khan Mazdoor Congress, Bhilwada which was received along with soft copy of the award

by the Central Government on 27.06.2023.

[No. L-29011/10/2020-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

अनुबंि

ihBklhu vf/kdkjh%

-¼ftyk U;k;k/kh'k laoxZ½

izdj.k la[;k % 2@2021 ,y- lh- vkj

la;qDr lfpo] [kku etnwj dkaxzsl

xka/kh etnwj lsoky;] HkhyokMk ¼jkt0½

-- izkFkhZ@;wfu;u

eSustj]vkj-ch-ekbZfuax ,aM daiuh]vksedkiqjk]iks0&xgqayh] -

rg0&dksVMh]ftyk&HkhyokMk¼jkt0½A

-- foi{kh@fu;kstd

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ughaA

foi{kh dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ughaA

fnukad 27-1-2023

Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=ky;]Hkkjr ljdkj dh vf/klwpuk dzekad%,Q ua0 ,y&29011@10@2020&vkbZ-vkj-

¼,e½ fnukad 23-12-2020 ds }kjk fuEu fookn bl U;k;ky; dks vf/kfu.kZ;kFkZ izsf"kr fd;k x;k&

'Whether of the action of the management of M/S R.B.Mining& Company in

terminatingt The Service of shri Shaitan S/O Shri MangilalGurjar W.r.f. 16.05.2020 is

legal and justified? If no, then to what relif the concerned workers are entitled ato and

from which date.

fookn izkIr gksus ij i{kdkjksa dks uksfVl tkjh dj ryc fd;k x;kA

vkt izkFkhZ gkftj ugha gSa A izkFkhZ dh rkehy Jfed la?k ds izfrfuf/k dks gks pqdh gSA izkFkhZ ;k mlds

izfrfuf/k vkt ckotwn rkehy gkftj ugha gSA vr% ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ dh bl izdj.k esa dksbZ :fp ugha

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : िुलाई 8, 2023/ आर्ाढ़ 17, 1945

2285

gS rFkk vc og bl izdj.k esa dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha pkgrk gSA vr% ^dksbZ fookn ugha jgk^ vk'k; dk iapkV tkjh

fd;k tkrk gSA

iapkV dh izfr dsUnz ljdkj dks izdk'kukFkZ Hksth tk;sA

lq'khy dqekj 'kekZ] U;k;k/kh'k

नई दिल्ली, 27 िून, 2023

का.आ. 1128.—औद्योगिक गििाद अगिगियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अिुसरण में, केन्द्रीय

सरकार मेससि स्टील ऑफ़ इंगडया गलगमटेड-आईएसपी, बििपुर के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध गियोजकों और आसिसोल-बििपुर-

कुल्टी मेटल एंड इंजीगियररंि िकिसि' यूगियि के बीच अिुबंि में गिर्दिष्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अगिकरण एिं श्रम

न्द्यायालय, आसिसोल के पंचाट (ररफरेन्द्स ि. -44/2018) को जैसा दक अिुलग्नक में ददखाया िया है, को प्रकागशत करती है

जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 27.06.2023 को प्राप्त हुआ था l

[सं. एल-26011/10/2018-आईआर(एम)]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 27th June, 2023

S.O. 1128.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Reference No. 44/2018) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum

Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to IM/s

Steel Authority of India Limited-ISP, Burnpur and Asansol-Burnpur-Kulti Metal and Engineering Workers’ Union

which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 27.06.2023.

[No. L-26011/10/2018-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT,

ASANSOL.

Present: Shri ANANDA KUMAR MUKHERJEE, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T-cum-L.C., Asansol.

REFERENCE CASE NO. 44 OF 2018

PARTIES: Asansol-Burnpur-Kulti Metal and Engineering Workers’ Union.

Vs.

Management of M/s. SAIL-ISP, Burnpur.

REPRESENTATIVES:

For the Union/Workmen: None.

For the Management: Mr. Debashis Mondal, learned advocate.

INDUSTRY:

Iron and Steel.

STATE:

West Bengal.

Dated:

27.04.2023

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No. L-

26011/10/2018-IR(M) dated 30.11.2018 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer, that is

the Management of M/s. SAIL-ISP, Burnpur and their workmen for adjudication by this Tribunal.

2286

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 8, 2023/ASHADHA 17, 1945

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the Management of M/s. ISP-SAIL, Burnpur in withdrawing the

subsidized canteen facilities in respect of labour engaged through contractors with

reference to settlement dated 05.09.1983 and 09.09.2009 without paying canteen allowance

(in lieu of subsidized canteen) to the contractor labour is just and legal? If not, to what

relief they are entitled to? ”

1. On receiving Order No. L-26011/10/2018-IR(M) dated 30.11.2018 from the Govt. of India, Ministry of

Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a Reference case No. 44 of 2018 was registered on 31.12.2018

and an order was passed issuing notice to the parties through registered post, directing them to appear and submit their

written statements along with relevant documents in support of their claims and a list of witnesses. Both parties

appeared before the Tribunal through their authorized representatives.

2. This case was fixed up on 21.04.2023 for appearance of parties and hearing. Mr. Debashis Mondal, learned

advocate appeared on behalf of General Manager (Pers.-CLC & HRIS), SAIL-ISP, Burnpur. On repeated calls at

01:55 PM, none appeared for the General Secretary, Asansol-Burnpur-Kulti Metal & Engineering Workers’ Union.

On a perusal of record, I find that fresh Notice under registered post was issued to the union representative, directing

him for his appearance. In this case, Mr. Subhasis Basu, the General Secretary of ABK Metal & Engineering

Workers’ Union has filed written statement long back on 13.02.2019 through Mr. Prasanta Ghosh, learned advocate.

But none has appeared.

3. It appears to me that ample opportunities have been given to the union representative to be present before the

Tribunal for submission of their case. Since no step has been taken, I am of the view that the union is not inclined to

proceed further with this case. Accordingly, the case is disposed of in form of a No dispute Award.

Hence,

ORDERED

that a No Dispute Award be drawn up in respect of the above Reference. Let copies of the Award in

duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India, New Delhi for information and

Notification.

ANANDA KUMAR MUKHERJEE, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 27 िून, 2023

का.आ. 1129.—औद्योगिक गििाद अगिगियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अिुसरण में, केन्द्रीय

सरकार इन्द्रप्रस्थ िैस गलगमटेड; अंतल्या इंटरप्राइजेज के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध गियोजकों और श्री रगबन्द्र प्रताप ससंह पुत्र श्री

गशििाथ ससंह, ददल्ली के बीच अिुबंि में गिर्दिष्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अगिकरण एिं श्रम न्द्यायालय-2, िई ददल्ली के

पंचाट (ररफरेन्द्स ि. -297/2021) को जैसा दक अिुलग्नक में ददखाया िया है, को प्रकागशत करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को

सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 27.06.2023 को प्राप्त हुआ था l

[सं. जेड-16025/04/2023-आईआर(एम)-43]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 27th June, 2023

S.O. 1129.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Reference No. 297/2021) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal

cum Labour Court-2, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in

relation to Indraprastha Gas Ltd; Antalya Enterprises and Shri Rabendra Pratap Singh S/o Shri Shivnath singh, Delhi

which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 27.06.2023.

[No. Z-16025/04/2023-IR(M)-43)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II, NEW DELHI.

Present: Smt. PRANITA MOHANTY, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-Cum-Labour Court-II, New Delhi.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 297/2021

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : िुलाई 8, 2023/ आर्ाढ़ 17, 1945

2287

Date of Passing Award- 16^th May, 2023

Between:

Sh. Rabendra Pratap Singh, S/o Sh. Shivnath Sigh,

R/o house no. B-143. 4^th Floor, Village Ghazipur,

Gali No. 03, Delhi-110096.

…Workman

Versus

1. Indraprastha Gas Ltd.

IGL Bhawan, Plot No. 4, Community Centre,

R.K Puram, K. D Colony, Sector-09 , New Delhi-110022.

2. Antalya Enterprises,

Through- Col. Shiraj Verma (proprietor)

House No. 1128, Sector-37, Noida, U.P-201301.

…Managements

Appearances:-

Claimant in person.

Sh. K.K Pandey, Ld. A/R for the management no. 1 IGL.

Sh. Raja Dutta(Manager) for the mgt no. 2 i.e Antalya Enterprises

AWARD

The claimant had filed an application invoking the provision of section 2 A of the ID. Act alleging illegal

termination of the service by the mgt no. 1 describing him as a principle employer.

In the claim statement as prayer was made for reinstatement in service with full back wages and other

consequential benefits. Being noticed the mgt of IGL appeared and filed written statement denying the employer and

employee relationship of the claimant and the mgt no. 1. It has been stated that the claimant was a contractual

employee employed by the contractor i.e the mgt no. 2. Hence, they prayed for dismissal of the claim petition filed

against them. The mgt no. 2 was proceeded ex-parte. When the matter was posted for framing of issue, the mgt no. 2

appeared and the parties are agreed to the proposal for conciliation and an amicable settlement. After persuasion the

parties agreed for conciliation and the claimant gave a statement to the effect that pursuant to the settlement the mgt

no. 2 Antalya Enterprises has reinstated him into service. Hence, he has no claim against any of the managements of

this proceeding.

In view of the same the present no dispute /no claim award is being passed. Hence ordered.

ORDER

The claim be and the same is disposed of as the claimant has no claim against the managements

Send a copy of this award to the appropriate government for notification as required under section 17 of the

ID act 1947.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

PRANITA MOHANTY, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 27 िून, 2023

का.आ. 1130.—औद्योगिक गििाद अगिगियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अिुसरण में, केन्द्रीय

सरकार इन्द्रप्रस्थ िैस गलगमटेड; अंतल्या इंटरप्राइजेज के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध गियोजकों और श्री प्रिेश कुमार पुत्र श्री रसिंर

ससंह तंिर, बाघपत के बीच अिुबंि में गिर्दिष्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अगिकरण एिं श्रम न्द्यायालय-2, िई ददल्ली के

पंचाट (ररफरेन्द्स ि. -298/2021) को जैसा दक अिुलग्नक में ददखाया िया है, को प्रकागशत करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को

सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 27.06.2023 को प्राप्त हुआ था l

[सं. जेड-16025/04/2023-आईआर(एम)-44]

डी. के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव

2288

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 8, 2023/ASHADHA 17, 1945

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 27th June, 2023

S.O. 1130.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Reference No. 298/2021) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal

cum Labour Court-2, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in

relation to Indraprastha Gas Ltd; Antalya Enterprises and Shri Pravesh Kumar S/o Shri Ravinder Singh Tanvar,

Baghpat which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 27.06.2023.

[No. Z-16025/04/2023-IR(M)-44]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II, NEW DELHI.

Present: Smt. PRANITA MOHANTY, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-Cum-Labour Court-II, New Delhi.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 298/2021

Date of Passing Award- 16^th May, 2023

Between:

Sh. Pravesh Kumar, S/o Sh. Ravinder Singh Tanvar,

R/o Village-Sunehera, Post Khera, District Baghpat,

…Workman

Versus

1. Indraprastha Gas Ltd.

IGL Bhawan, Plot No. 4, Community Centre,

R.K Puram, K. D Colony, Sector-09 , New Delhi-110022.

2. Antalya Enterprises,

Through- Col. Shiraj Verma (proprietor)

House No. 1128, Sector-37, Noida, U.P-201301

….. Managements

Appearances:-