1548

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 20, 2024/CHAITRA 31, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Financial Services)

New Delhi, the 12th January, 2024

S.O. 698.— In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 8 of The Reserve

Bank of India Act, 1934, read with sub-section (4) of section 8 thereof, the Central Government hereby re-appoints

Shri Michael Debabrata Patra (Date of Birth: 29.9.1960) as Deputy Governor, Reserve Bank of India for a further

period of one year with effect from 15.1.2024, or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[eF. No. 1/2/2023-BO-I]

SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 30 िनवरी, 2024

का.आ. 699.—बैंककारी कंृनी (उृक्रमों का अिवन और अंतरण) अजिजन म, 1970 की िारा 9 की उृ-िारा

(3) के ंड (क) के ृरंतुक द्वारा प्रित्त िजक्त ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, केन्री सरकार, एति् द्वारा इजण्ड न ओवरसीि बैंक के

का वृालक जनिेिक श्री संि जवना क मुिजल ार को उनके का व-भार ग्रिण करने की तारी से उनकी का ावजि की िेर्

अवजि तक अ ावत दिनांक 31.12.2025 तक ा अगले आिेिों तक, िो भी ृिले िो, बैंक आफ बड़़ौिा में का वृालक

जनिेिक के ृि ृर जन ुक्त करती िै।

[ई. फा.सं. 4/1(i)/2024-बीओ-I]

संि कुमार जमश्र, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 30th January, 2024

S.O. 699.—In exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to clause (a) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of

the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act,1970, the Central Government hereby posts

Shri Sanjay Vinayak Mudaliar, Executive Director, Indian Overseas Bank as Executive Director in Bank of Baroda

with effect from his taking over charge for the remainder of his term i.e. upto 31.12.2025, or until further orders,

whichever is earlier.

[eF. No. 4/1(i)/2024-BO-I]

SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 30 िनवरी, 2024

का.आ. 700.—बैंककारी कंृनी (उृक्रमों का अिवन और अंतरण) अजिजन म, 1970 की िारा 9 की उृ-िारा

(3) के ंड (क) के ृरंतुक द्वारा प्रित्त िजक्त ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, केन्री सरकार, एति् द्वारा बैंक आफ बड़़ौिा के

का वृालक जनिेिक श्री िॉ िीृ ित्ता रॉ को उनके का व-भार ग्रिण करने की तारी से उनकी का ावजि की िेर् अवजि

तक अ ावत दिनांक 20.10.2024 तक ा अगले आिेिों तक, िो भी ृिले िो, इजण्ड न ओवरसीि बैंक के का वृालक

जनिेिक के ृि ृर जन ुक्त करती िै।

[ई. फा.सं. 4/1(ii)/2024-बीओ-I]

संि कुमार जमश्र, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 30th January, 2024

S.O. 700.—In exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to clause (a) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of

the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act,1970, the Central Government hereby posts

Shri Joydeep Dutta Roy, Executive Director, Bank of Baroda as Executive Director in Indian Overseas Bank with

effect from his taking over charge for the remainder of his term i.e. upto 20.10.2024, or until further orders,

whichever is earlier.

[eF. No. 4/1(ii)/2024-BO-I]

SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA, Under Secy.

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 20, 2024/ चैत्र 31, 1946

1549

नई दिल्ली, 21 फरवरी, 2024

का.आ. 701.—राष्ट्री कषत बैंक (प्रबंि और प्रकीणव उृबंि) स्ट्कीम, 1970 के ृैरा 5(1) और 9(2)( ) के सा

ृर त बैंककारी कंृनी (उृक्रमों का अिवन और अंतरण) अजिजन म, 1970 की िारा 9 की उृ-िारा (3) के ंड (ि) के

तित प्रित्त िजक्त ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, केन्री सरकार, एति् द्वारा, श्री एम. आर. कुमार (िन्म जतज िः 13.6.1961) को

अजिसूचना की तारी से तीन वर्व की अवजि के जलए अ वा अगले आिेिों तक, िो भी ृिले िो, बैंक आफ इंजड ा के बोडव

में गैर-का वकारी अध् क्ष और अंिकाजलक गैर-सरकारी जनिेिक के ृि ृर जन ुक्त करती िै।

[फा. सं. 6/26(i)/2023-बीओ-I]

संि कुमार जमश्र, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 21st February, 2024

S.O. 701.—In exercise of powers conferred under clause (h) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, read with paragraph 5(1) and 9(2)(b) of the

Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central Government hereby

appoints Shri M.R. Kumar (DoB: 13.6.1961) as part-time Non-Official Director as well as Non-Executive Chairman

on the Board of Bank of India, for a term of three years, from the date of notification, or until further orders,

whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 6/26(i)/2023-BO-I]

SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 21 फरवरी, 2024

का.आ. 702.—राष्ट्री कषत बैंक (प्रबंि और प्रकीणव उृबंि) स्ट्कीम, 1970 के ृैरा 5(1) और 9(2)( ) के सा

तित प्रित्त िजक्त ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, केन्री सरकार, एति् द्वारा, श्री श्रीजनवासन श्रीिर (िन्म जतज िः 3.5.1960) को

अजिसूचना की तारी से तीन वर्व की अवजि के जलए अ वा अगले आिेिों तक, िो भी ृिले िो, इजण्ड न ओवरसीि बैंक

के बोडव में गैर-का वकारी अध् क्ष और अंिकाजलक गैर-सरकारी जनिेिक के ृि ृर जन ुक्त करती िै।

[फा. सं. 6/26(ii)/2023-बीओ-I]

संि कुमार जमश्र, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 21st February, 2024

S.O. 702.—In exercise of powers conferred under clause (h) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, read with paragraph 5(1) and 9(2)(b) of the

Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central Government hereby

appoints Shri Srinivasan Sridhar (DoB: 3.5.1960) as part-time Non-Official Director as well as Non-Executive

Chairman on the Board of Indian Overseas Bank, for a term of three years, from the date of notification, or until

further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 6/26(ii)/2023-BO-I]

SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 21 फरवरी, 2024

का.आ. 703.—राष्ट्री कषत बैंक (प्रबंि और प्रकीणव उृबंि) स्ट्कीम, 1970 के ृैरा 5(1) और 9(2)( ) के सा

तित प्रित्त िजक्त ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, केन्री सरकार, एति् द्वारा, श्री अरवमुिन कष्‍ण कुमार (िन्म जतज िः

18.11.1954) को अजिसूचना की तारी से तीन वर्व की अवजि के जलए अ वा अगले आिेिों तक, िो भी ृिले िो, ूको

बैंक के बोडव में गैर-का वकारी अध् क्ष और अंिकाजलक गैर-सरकारी जनिेिक के ृि ृर जन ुक्त करती िै।

[फा. सं. 6/26(iii)/2023-बीओ-I]

संि कुमार जमश्र, अवर सजचव

1550

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 20, 2024/CHAITRA 31, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 21st February, 2024

S.O. 703.—In exercise of powers conferred under clause (h) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the Banking

Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, read with paragraph 5(1) and 9(2)(b) of the

Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central Government hereby

appoints Shri Aravamudan Krishna Kumar (DoB: 18.11.1954) as part-time Non-Official Director as well as Non-

Executive Chairman on the Board of UCO Bank, for a term of three years, from the date of notification, or until

further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 6/26(iii)/2023-BO-I]

SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 27 माचव, 2024

का.आ. 704.—बैंककारी कंृनी (उृक्रमों का अिवन और अंतरण) अजिजन म, 1970 की िारा 9 की उृ-िारा

(3) के ंड (क) के ृरन्तुक द्वारा प्रित्त िजक्त ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, केन्री सरकार, एति् द्वारा, श्री जनिु सक्सेना के बैंक

आफ मिाराष्ट्र में एमडी एंड सीईओ के ृि ृर च न िोने के ृररणामस्ट्वप ृ उनके द्वारा ूजन न बैंक आफ इंजड ा में

का वृालक जनिेिक का ृि त् ाग करने की तारी को ा उसके ृश्चात श्री जनिु सक्सेना के स्ट् ान ृर ृंिाब एंड ससंि बैंक

के मिाप्रबंिक श्री ृंकि जद्ववेिी (िन्म जतज : 2.6.1970) को का वभार ग्रिण करने की तारी से तीन वर्व की अवजि के

जलए अ वा अगले आिेिों तक, िो भी ृिले िो, ूजन न बैंक आफ इंजड ा में का वृालक जनिेिक के ृि ृर जन ुक्त करती

िै।

[ई फा.सं. 4/3/2023-बीओ-I]

संि कुमार जमश्र, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 27th, March, 2024

S.O. 704.—In exercise of powers conferred by the proviso to clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 9 of the

Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, Central Government hereby appoints

Shri Pankaj Dwivedi (DoB: 2.6.1970), General Manager, Punjab & Sind Bank as Executive Director (ED), Union

Bank of India, vice Shri Nidhu Saxena, consequent upon his selection as MD&CEO, Bank of Maharashtra, for a

period of three years, with effect from the date of assumption of office, on or after the date of relinquishment of the

post of Executive Director, Union Bank of India by Shri Nidhu Saxena, or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[eF. No. 4/3/2023-BO-I]

SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 27 माचव, 2024

का.आ. 705.—बैंककारी कंृनी (उृक्रमों का अिवन और अंतरण) अजिजन म, 1970 की िारा 9 की उृ-िारा

(3) के ंड (क) के ृरन्तुक द्वारा प्रित्त िजक्त ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, केन्री सरकार, एति् द्वारा, श्री ए. एस. रािीव के

केन्री सतकवता आ ोग में सतकवता आ ुक्त के ृि ृर च न के ृररणामस्ट्वप ृ, उनके स्ट् ान ृर ूजन न बैंक आफ इंजड ा

के का वृालक जनिेिक श्री जनिु सक्सेना (िन्म जतज : 10.6.1968) को का वभार ग्रिण करने की तारी से तीन वर्व की

अवजि के जलए अ वा अगले आिेिों तक, िो भी ृिले िो, बैंक आफ मिाराष्ट्र में प्रबंि जनिेिक एवं मु्‍ का वकारी

अजिकारी (एमडी एंड सीईओ) के ृि ृर जन ुक्त करती िै।

[ई फा. सं. 4/3/2023-बीओ-I]

संि कुमार जमश्र, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 27th, March, 2024

S.O. 705.—In exercise of powers conferred by the proviso to clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 9 of the

Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, Central Government hereby appoints

Shri Nidhu Saxena (DoB: 10.6.1968), Executive Director (ED), Union Bank of India as Managing Director and Chief

Executive Officer (MD & CEO) of Bank of Maharashtra, vice Shri A.S. Rajeev, consequent upon his selection as

Vigilance Commissioner in Central Vigilance Commission, for a period of three years with effect from the date of

assumption of office, or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[eF. No. 4/3/2023-BO-I]

SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA, Under Secy.

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 20, 2024/ चैत्र 31, 1946

1551

ृैरोजल म और प्राकषजतक गैस मंत्राल

नई दिल्ली, 5 अप्रैल, 2024

का.आ. 706.—केन्री सरकार को ृेरोजल म और जनि ृाइृलाइन (भूजम में उृ ॉग के अजिकार का अिवन)

अजिजन म, 1962 (1962 का 50) जिसे इसमें ृश् चात् उक्त अजिजन म किा ग ा िै की िारा 3 की उृिारा (1) के अिीन

िारी की गई, भारत सरकार के का.आ. सँ्‍ ा 2670(अ) दिनाँक 13.06.2023, रािृत्र सँ्‍ 2557 दिनाँक

16.06.2023 के ृेरोजल म, अजिसूचना से संलग्र अनुसूची में जवजनदरष्ट भूजम में, आँध्र प्रिेि राज् में श्रीकाकुलम जिला में

श्रीकाकुलम से अंगुल ृाइप्लाइन(एसएृीएळ) के माध् म से प्राकषजतक गैस के ृररविन के जलए गेल (इजड ा) जलजमटेड

द्वारा ृाइृलाइन जबछाई के जलए उृ ोग के अजिकार का अिवन करने के अृने आि की घोर्णा की ी ;

और उक्त रािृत्र अजिसूचना की प्रजत ाँ िनता को उृलब्ि करा िी गई ी ;

और सक्षम प्राजिकारी ने उक्त अजिजन म की िारा 6 की उृिारा (1) के अिीन केन्री सरकार को अृनी ररृोटव

िे िी िै ;

और भारत सरकार, ने उक् त ररृोटव ृर जवचार करने के ृश् चात् और ि संतु्‍ ट िो िाने ृर दक उक् त भूजम

ृाइृलाइनें जबछाने के जलए अृेजर्त िै, उसमें उृ ोग के अजिकार का अिवन करने का जवजनश् च दक ा िै ;

अतिः अब केन्री सरकार, उक्त अजिजन म की िारा 6 की उृिारा ( 1 ) प्रित्त िजक्त ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, िाँ

घोर्णा करती िै दक इस अजिसूचना से संलग्र अनुसूची में जवजनर्िव्‍ ट भूजम में ृाइृलाइनें जबछाने के जलए उृ ोग के

अजिकार का अिवन दक ा िाता िै ;

और, भारत सरकार, उक्त अजिजन म की िारा 6 दक उृिारा (4) द्वारा प्रित्त्त िजक्त ों का प्र ोग करते हुए,

जनिेि िेती िै दक ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के जलए भूजम में उृ ोग का अजिकार, इस घोर्णा के प्रकािन की तारी से, भारत

सरकार में जनजित िोने के बिाए, सभी जवल्लंगमों से मुक्त िोकर, गेल (इजण्ड ा) जलजमटेड में जनजित िोगा और तिुृरर,

भूजम में ऐसे उृ ोग का अजिकार, इस प्रकार अजिरोजृत जनबंिनों और ितों के अिीन रिते हुए, सभी जवल् ंलगमों से मुक् त,

गेल (इजण्ड ा) जलजमटेड में जनजित िोगा।

श्रीकाकुलम -अंगुल ृाइृलाइन (एसएृीएल) ृरर ोिना

भूजम अनुसूची

जिला-श्रीकाकुलम

राज् : आंध्र प्रिेि

मंडल का नाम

गाँव का नाम

सवे नं०

क्षेत्रफल

िेक्टर

आरे

वगव मीटर

श्रीकाकुलम

गुडम

243/3

243/2

242/4

242/3

259

258/24

258/25

261/1A

261/1B1

261/1B

261/1C

[फा. सं. एल–14014-2-2023-िीृी-II(ई-45875)]

रामिी लाल मीना, अवर सजचव

1552

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 20, 2024/CHAITRA 31, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi, the 5th, April, 2024

S.O. 706.—Whereas by Notification of Government of India, in Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas vide

S.O. No. 2670(E) dated 13.06.2023; issued under sub - section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum & Minerals Pipelines

(Acquisition of right of users in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), published in the

Extra Ordinary Gazette of India No . 2557, dated 16.06.2023, and respectively in the Central Government declared

its intention to acquire the Right of User in the lands specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the

purpose of laying Pipeline form SAPL Srikakulam to Angul in Srikakulam District in State of Andhra Pradesh by

GAIL (India) Limited; Srikakulam

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public;

And whereas the Competent Authority has, under sub-section (1) of section (6) of the said Act, submitted its

report to Government of India;

And whereas Government of India after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land

is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire the Right of User therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub section (1) of section (6) of the said Act, the

Government of India hereby declares that the Right of User in the said lands specified in the Schedule appended to

this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And, further, in exercise of powers conferred by sub section (4) of the Section (6) of the said Act, Government of

India hereby directs the Right of User in the land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in Government of

India, vest, on the this date of the publication of the declaration, in the GAIL (India) Limited, free from all

encumbrances.

SRIKAKULAM- ANGUL PIPELINE (SAPL) PROJECT

LAND SCHEDULE

District-Srikakulam

State: Andhra Pradesh

Name of Mandal

Name of

Village

Survey no.

Area

Hector

Are.

Sq.mtr.

Srikakulam

Gudem

243/3

243/2

242/4

242/3

259

258/24

258/25

261/1A

261/1B1

261/1B

261/1C

[F. No. L-14014-2-2023-GP-II(E-45875)]

RAMJI LAL MEENA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 5 अप्रैल, 2024

का.आ. 707.—भारत सरकार ने ृेरोजल म और जनि ृाइृलाइन (भूजम में उृ ोग के अजिकार का अिवन)

अजिजन म, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके ृश्चात् उक्त अजिजन म किा ग ा िै) की िारा 3 की उृिारा (1) के

अिीन िारी भारत सरकार के ृेरोजल म और प्राकषजतक गैस मंत्राल की अजिसूचना सं्‍ ा का.आ. 4969(अ)

तारी 26.10.2023 िो भारत के असािारण रािृत्र तारी 17.11.2023 में प्रकाजित की ग ी ी, द्वारा उस

अजिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में जवजनर्िवष्ट भूजम में गेल (इजण्ड ा) जलजमटेड द्वारा मध् प्रिेि राज् में मुम्बई – नागृुर –

झारसुगुडा प्राकषजतक गैस ृाइृलाइन के ंड नागृुर - िबलृुर ृाइृलाइन के माध् म से प्राकषजतक गैस के ृररविन के

जलए ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के प्र ोिन के जलए उृ ोग के अजिकार का अिवन करने के अृने आि की घोर्णा की ी;

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 20, 2024/ चैत्र 31, 1946

1553

और उक्त रािृत्र अजिसूचना की प्रजत ां िनता को उृलब्ि करा िी गई ी;

और सक्षम प्राजिकारी ने, उक्त अजिजन म की िारा 6 की उृिारा (1) के अिीन भारत सरकार को अृनी ररृोटव

िे िी िै;

और भारत सरकार ने, उक्त ररृोटव ृर जवचार करने के ृश्चात् और ि संतुष्ट िो िाने ृर दक उक्त भूजम

ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के जलए अृेजक्षत िै, उसमें उृ ोग के अजिकार का अिवन करने का जवजनश्च दक ा िै;

अतिः अब, भारत सरकार, उक्त अजिजन म की िारा 6 की उृिारा (1) द्वारा प्रित्त्त िजक्त ों का प्र ोग करते हुए,

ि घोर्णा करती िै दक इस अजिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में जवजनर्िवष्ट भूजम में ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के जलए उृ ोग के

अजिकार का अिवन दक ा िाता िै;

सरकार में जनजित िोने के बिाए, सभी जवल्लंगमों से मुक्त िोकर, गेल (इजण्ड ा) जलजमटेड में जनजित िोगा।

अनुसूची

413/1

415/2

270/3

149/4

149/7

149/3

41/11

81/2

173/3

156/1

156/2

172/2

172/1

341/1/5

350/2

265/3

60/5

[फा. सं. एल-14014/82/2022-िीृी-II(ई-42552)]

रामिी लाल मीना, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 5th, April, 2024

S.O. 707.—Whereas by notification of Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas

S.O. No. 4969 (E) dated 26.10.2023 issued under sub- section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

1554

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 20, 2024/CHAITRA 31, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act),

published in the Extra Ordinary Gazette of India dated 17.11.2023 the Government of India declared its intention to

acquire the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying

pipeline for transportation of natural gas through Nagpur – Jabalpur Pipeline section of Mumbai – Nagpur –

Jharsuguda Pipeline Project in the State of Madhya Pradesh by GAIL (India) Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public;

And whereas the Competent Authority has, under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted its

report to Government of India;

And whereas Government of India after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land

is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire the Right of User therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act,

Government of India hereby declares that the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this

notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And, further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, Government

of India hereby directs that the Right of User in the land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in

Government of India, vest, on this date of the publication of the declaration, in the GAIL (India) Limited, free from

all encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

Mumbai-Nagpur-Jharsuguda Natural Gas Pipeline

Section- Nagpur – Jabalpur

SCHEDULE

State : Madhya Pradesh

District

Tehsil

Village

Survey No.

Area

Hect.

Are

Sq. mtr.

Chhindwara

Mohkhed

Arjunwadi

413/1

Chhindwara

Mohkhed

KukadaChiman

415/2

Chhindwara

Mohkhed

Hiwara Wasudeo

270/3

Chhindwara

Sausar

Ghoti

149/4

149/7

149/3

Chhindwara

Sausar

Ghoghri-6

41/11

Chhindwara

Bohna

81/2

173/3

156/1

156/2

172/2

172/1

Chhindwara

Chaurai

Jamuniya

341/1/5

350/2

Seoni

Kanhargaon

265/3

Seoni

Chhapara

Pipariya

60/5

[F. No. L-14014/ 82 /2022 -GP-II(E- 42552)]

RAMJI LAL MEENA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 5 अप्रैल, 2024

का.आ. 708.—Hkkjr ljdkj us isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbu ¼Hkwfe eas mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½

vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ ¼ftls blesa blds i”pkr~ mDr vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gS½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ ds

v/khu tkjh Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e vkSj izkd`frd xSl ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 2605¼v½ rkjh[k

05-06-2023 tks Hkkjr ds vlk/kkj.k jkti= rkjh[k 13-06-2023] esa izdkf”kr dh x;h Fkh] n~okjk ml vf/klwpuk ls layXu

vuqlwph esa fofufnZ’V Hkwfe esa xsy ¼bf.M;k½ fyfeVsM n~okjk egkjk’Vª jkT; esa eqacbZ & ukxiwj & >kjlqxqMk izkd`frd xSl

ikbiykbu ds [kaM ukxiwj & tcyiqj ikbiykbu ds ek/;e ls izkd`frd xSl ds ifjogu ds fy, ikbiykbu fcNkus ds

iz;kstu ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus ds vius vk”k; dh ?kks’k.kk dh Fkh(

vkSj mDr jkti= vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka turk dks miyC/k djk nh xbZ Fkh(

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 20, 2024/ चैत्र 31, 1946

1555

vkSj l{ke izkf/kdkjh us turk ls izkIr vk{ksiksa dks ijh{k.k ds mijkar fuiVku dj fn;k gS(

vkSj l{ke izkf/kdkjh us] mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu Hkkjr ljdkj dks viuh fjiksVZ ns nh

gS(

vkSj Hkkjr ljdkj us] mDr fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i”pkr~ vkSj ;g larq’V gks tkus ij fd mDr Hkwfe ikbiykbu

fcNkus ds fy, visf{kr gS] ml esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus dk fofu”p; fd;k gS(

vr% vc] Hkkjr ljdkj] mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ n~okjk iznRr “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,]

;g ?kks’k.kk djrh gS fd bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ’V Hkwfe esa ikbiykbu fcNkus ds fy, mi;ksx ds

vf/kdkj dk vtZu fd;k tkrk gS(

vkSj] Hkkjr ljdkj] mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 fd mi/kkjk ¼4½ n~okjk iznRr “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] funsZ”k

nsrh gS fd ikbiykbu fcNkus ds fy, Hkwfe esa mi;ksx dk vf/kdkj] bl ?kks’k.kk ds izdk”ku dh rkjh[k ls] Hkkjr ljdkj esa

fufgr gksus ds ctk,] lHkh foYyaxeksa ls eqDr gksdj] xsy ¼bf.M;k½ fyfeVsM esa fufgr gksxkA

अनुसूची

िबलृुर

ukxiwj

कलमेश्वर

xkSaM[kSjh

351

339

395

ukxiwj

कलमेश्वर

lksuksyh

484

481

466

467

465

431

430

429

374

373

375

376

377

380

381

357

356

353

355

[फा. सं. एल–14014/82/2022-िीृी-II (ई-42552)]

रामिी लाल मीना, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 5th, April, 2024

S.O. 708.—Whereas by Notification of Government of India, in Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas vide

S.O. No. 2605(E) dated 05.06.2023; issued under sub - section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum & Minerals Pipelines

1556

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 20, 2024/CHAITRA 31, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(Acquisition of right of users in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), published in the

Extra Ordinary Gazette of India dated 13.06.2023, the Government of India declared its intention to acquire the right

of user in the lands specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Pipeline for

transportation of natural gas through Mumbai – Nagpur – Jharsuguda (Section:- Nagpur - Jabalpur) pipeline in the

State of Maharashtra by GAIL (India) Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public;

And whereas the objections received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered of by

the Competent Authority;

And whereas the Competent Authority has, under sub-section (1) of section (6) of the said Act, submitted its

report to Government of India;

And whereas Government of India after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land

is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire the Right of User therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub section (1) of section (6) of the said Act, the

Government of India hereby declares that the Right of User in the said lands specified in the Schedule appended to

this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And, further, in exercise of powers conferred by sub section (4) of the Section (6) of the said Act,

Government of India hereby directs the Right of User in the land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in

Government of India, vest, on the this date of the publication of the declaration, in the GAIL (India) Limited, free

from all encumbrances.

Mumbai-Nagpur-Jharsuguda Natural Gas Pipeline

Section - Nagpur - Jabalpur

SCHEDULE

State : Maharashtra

District

Taluka

Village

Survey No.

Area

Hect.

Are

Sq.

mtr.

Nagpur

Kalmeshwar

Gondkhairi

351

339

395

Nagpur

Kalmeshwar

Sonoli

484

481

466

467

465

431

430

429

374

373

375

376

377

380

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 20, 2024/ चैत्र 31, 1946

1557

381

357

356

353

355

[F. No. L-14014/82/2022-GP-II (E-42552)]

RAMJI LAL MEENA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 5 अप्रैल, 2024

का.आ. 709.—भारत सरकार ने ृेरोजल म और जनि ृाइृलाइन (भूजम में उृ ोग के अजिकार का अिवन)

अिीन िारी भारत सरकार के ृेरोजल म और प्राकषजतक गैस मंत्राल की अजिसूचना सं्‍ ा का.आ. 4978 (अ) तारी

26.10.2023 िो भारत के असािारण रािृत्र तारी 17.11.2023 में प्रकाजित की ग ी ी, द्वारा उस अजिसूचना से

संलग्न अनुसूची में जवजनर्िवष्ट भूजम में गेल (इजण्ड ा) जलजमटेड द्वारा मध् प्रिेि राज् में मुम्बई – नागृुर – झारसुगुडा

प्राकषजतक गैस ृाइृलाइन के ंड नागृुर - िबलृुर ृाइृलाइन के माध् म से प्राकषजतक गैस के ृररविन के जलए

ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के प्र ोिन के जलए उृ ोग के अजिकार का अिवन करने के अृने आि की घोर्णा की ी;

और उक्त रािृत्र अजिसूचना की प्रजत ां िनता को उृलब्ि करा िी गई ी;

िे िी िै;

अजिकार का अिवन दक ा िाता िै;

fNanokM+k

lkSalj

?kM+sykeky

105/1

135/2/1

135/1

fNanokM+k

lkSalj

nsoh

58/1

1558

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 20, 2024/CHAITRA 31, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

fNanokM+k

lkSalj

vkyslqj

207/6

fNanokM+k

lkSalj

fcNqvkcXxq

177/1

258/7

fNanokM+k

lkSalj

ftjksyk

164/1

76/7

76/3

76/5

fNanokM+k

lkSalj

ckM+sxk¡o

57/1

57/4

fNanokM+k

lkSalj

?kksVh

253/2

254

257/1

184

116/1

115/2

fNanokM+k

lkSalj

jaxkjhlksij

292

207

260

130

fNanokM+k

lkSalj

jaxkjhBksdk

247

205

93/3

93/4

fNanokM+k

lkSalj

lkaoxk

376/1

377/3

156/1

161/2

42/1

40/2

29/6

28/2

fNanokM+k

lkSalj

jtkMhcksjxk¡o

107/2

129

70/1

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 20, 2024/ चैत्र 31, 1946

1559

72/1

fNanokM+k

lkSalj

nq/kkykdkyk

107

fNanokM+k

lkSalj

nq/kkyk[kqnZ

163

160/2

fNanokM+k

fcNqvk

fHkekyxksnh

85/3

97/1

fNanokM+k

fcNqvk

[knosyh

5/3

29/2

fNanokM+k

fcNqvk

eksgikuh fclk

15/2

15/3

15/4

fNanokM+k

fcNqvk

eksgikuheky

241/6

fNanokM+k

eksg[ksM+

teqfu;kcMh

134

fNanokM+k

eksg[ksM+

teqfu;keky

86/5

fNanokM+k

eksg[ksM+

jaxkjhrkykc

92/2

87/10

80/1

66/1

71/1

fNanokM+k

eksg[ksM+

cksfFk;k

12/2

13/4

fNanokM+k

eksg[ksM+

fclkiqj [kqnZ

309/2

309/3

233/2

236/2

221

217

210

189/8

fNanokM+k

eksg[ksM+

fclkiqjdyk¡

329/3

330/4

139/1

139/3

1560

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 20, 2024/CHAITRA 31, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

179/1

180

174

196/14

201/1/2

202/1

67/5

48/3

43/1

9/1

fNanokM+k

eksg[ksM+

yksfu;k

521

519/1

504

500/1

503/8

fNanokM+k

eksg[ksM+

ysank?kksanh

166/1

166/10

166/3

166/2

158/2

158/3

154

155/4

104/2

fNanokM+k

eksg[ksM+

vtqZuokMh

475

461/1

562/3

fNanokM+k

eksg[ksM+

dqdM+kfpeu

410

413/1

416/3

342/9

342/7

fNanokM+k

ekYguokM+k

426/4

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 20, 2024/ चैत्र 31, 1946

1561

425/3

fNanokM+k

HkkuknsbZ

42/4

42/6

196/5

fNanokM+k

ikaFk

287

288/12

288/7

288/5

327/1

fNanokM+k

uosxk¡o

163

359/1

359/2

300/1

59/1/1

59/1/3

149/1/1

149/1/2

149/1/3

149/1/4

149/1/5

154/2/1/1/1/3

154/2/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1

154/2/1/1/1/1/1/1/2

154/2/1/1/2

154/2/1/1/1/1/1/2

154/2/1/1/1/1/2

156/1

fNanokM+k

ddbZ

512/1

fNanokM+k

jaxhu[kkik

314/2

367

fNanokM+k

cksguk

303/2

300/1/1

300/1/2

300/2

173/3

1562

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 20, 2024/CHAITRA 31, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

156/2

fNanokM+k

pkSjbZ

phapxk¡o

613

662

668

fNanokM+k

pkSjbZ

ekpkxksjk

302/5/1

290/1/2,291/2

290/1/4,291/4

290/1/3,291/3

290/1/1,291/1

364/2/2,365/2,366/3

fNanokM+k

pkSjbZ

flaxuk

88/2

83/3

fNanokM+k

pkSjbZ

[kVdj

364/3,365/3,366/3

fNanokM+k

pkSjbZ

yksgkjk

286/1,287/1

433/1-436/4

fNanokM+k

pkSjbZ

esagxksjk

90/18/1

62/1/1-62/2

fNanokM+k

pkSjbZ

?kks?kjh

218

310/1/2

320-321

fNanokM+k

pkSjbZ

vkekcksg

375/1

95/1/1-96/3/1

fNanokM+k

pkSjbZ

xksikyiqj

87/3-80/3-84/2-85/2-86/2-87/4-88/14

flouh

tke

594/5

590

594/1

flouh

Nikjk

fcNqvk

49/1/1

23/4

23/3

flouh

Nikjk

fiifj;k

139/3

flouh

y[kuknkSu

[kqjlhikj

65/3,67/2

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 20, 2024/ चैत्र 31, 1946

1563

46/8

65/1

flouh

y[kuknkSu

tksok

199/2

167

126/2

127/1

flouh

y[kuknkSu

?kks?kjhdyk

263/1

263/8

263/5

263/7

flouh

y[kuknkSu

eksgxkao

105/1/1/1

105/1/1/3

105/2/1

105/1/4

105/1/3

105/1/2

105/2/1/1

105/2/1/2

105/2/5/1

105/2/5/2

105/2/4/2

105/2/3

105/2/2

flouh

y[kuknkSu

fHkyek

400/1

flouh

y[kuknkSu

xus'kxat

170/2

176

171

174/1,174/2

िबलृुर

tcyiqj

gqYdh

198/2

197

tcyiqj

dkyknsgh

194

tcyiqj

eaxsyk

489

492/2

tcyiqj

cjxh

566

1564

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 20, 2024/CHAITRA 31, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

tcyiqj

lkyhokM+k

356

363/4

381/4

379

tcyiqj

clgk

38/2

tcyiqj

jhek

312

306

307

tcyiqj

clfu;k

75/1

73/3

tcyiqj

flyqok&50

754/1/2

734

708/2

707/1

tcyiqj

pkS[kM+k

182/2/1

182/2/2

182/3/2

114

115

116

117

tcyiqj

[kEgfj;k

409

410

414

415

444

402

tcyiqj

fiifj;kdyk&51

13/4

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 20, 2024/ चैत्र 31, 1946

1565

tcyiqj

dksle?kkV

374/5

[फा. सं. एल-14014/206 /2022-िीृी-II (ई-44561)]

रामिी लाल मीना, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 5th, April, 2024

S.O. 709.—Whereas by notification of Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas

S.O. No. 4978 (E) dated 26.10.2023 issued under sub- section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act),

published in the Extra Ordinary Gazette of India dated 17.11.2023 the Government of India declared its intention to

acquire the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying

pipeline for transportation of natural gas through Nagpur – Jabalpur Pipeline section of Mumbai – Nagpur –

Jharsuguda Pipeline Project in the State of Madhya Pradesh by GAIL (India) Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public;

And whereas the Competent Authority has, under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted its

report to Government of India;

And whereas Government of India after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land

is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire the Right of User therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act,

Government of India hereby declares that the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this

notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And, further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, Government

of India hereby directs that the Right of User in the land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in

Government of India, vest, on this date of the publication of the declaration, in the GAIL (India) Limited, free from

all encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

Mumbai-Nagpur-Jharsuguda Natural Gas Pipeline

Section- Nagpur – Jabalpur

State : Madhya Pradesh

District

Tehsil

Village

Survey No.

Area

Hect.

Are

Sq. mtr.

Chhindwara

Sausar

Ghadela Mal

105/1

135/2/1

135/1

Chhindwara

Sausar

Devi

58/1

Chhindwara

Sausar

Alesur

207/6

Chhindwara

Sausar

BichhuwaBaggu

177/1

258/7

Chhindwara

Sausar

Jirola

164/1

76/7

76/3

76/5

Chhindwara

Sausar

Badegaon

57/1

57/4

1566

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 20, 2024/CHAITRA 31, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Chhindwara

Sausar

Ghoti

253/2

254

257/1

184

116/1

115/2

Chhindwara

Sausar

Rangari Sopar

292

207

260

130

Chhindwara

Sausar

Rangari Thoka

247

205

93/3

93/4

Chhindwara

Sausar

Sanwaga

376/1

377/3

156/1

161/2

42/1

40/2

29/6

28/2

Chhindwara

Sausar

RajadiBorgaon

107/2

129

70/1

72/1

Chhindwara

Sausar

Dudhalakala

107

Chhindwara

Sausar

DudhalaKhurd

163

160/2

Chhindwara

Bichhua

Bhimalgodi

85/3

97/1

Chhindwara

Bichhua

Khadveli

5/3

29/2

Chhindwara

Bichhua

MohpaniBisa

15/2

15/3

15/4

Chhindwara

Bichhua

Mohpani Mal

241/6

Chhindwara

Mohkhed

Jamuniya Badi

134

Chhindwara

Mohkhed

Jamuniya Mal

86/5

Chhindwara

Mohkhed

Rangari Talab

92/2

87/10

80/1

66/1

Chhindwara

Mohkhed

Tara

71/1

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 20, 2024/ चैत्र 31, 1946

1567

Chhindwara

Mohkhed

Bothiya

12/2

13/4

Chhindwara

Mohkhed

Bisapur Khurd

309/2

309/3

233/2

236/2

221

217

210

189/8

Chhindwara

Mohkhed

BeesapurKalan

329/3

330/4

139/1

139/3

179/1

180

174

196/14

201/1/2

202/1

67/5

48/3

43/1

9/1

Chhindwara

Mohkhed

Lonia

521

519/1

504

500/1

503/8

Chhindwara

Mohkhed

Lendagondi

166/1

166/10

166/3

166/2

158/2

158/3

154

155/4

104/2

Chhindwara

Mohkhed

Arjunwadi

475

461/1

562/3

1568

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 20, 2024/CHAITRA 31, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Chhindwara

Mohkhed

KukadaChiman

410

413/1

416/3

342/9

342/7

Chhindwara

Malhanwada

426/4

425/3

Chhindwara

Bhanadei

42/4

42/6

196/5

Chhindwara

Panth

287

288/12

288/7

288/5

327/1

Chhindwara

Navegaon

163

359/1

359/2

300/1

59/1/1

59/1/3

149/1/1

149/1/2

149/1/3

149/1/4

149/1/5

154/2/1/1/1/3

154/2/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1

154/2/1/1/1/1/1/1/2

154/2/1/1/2

154/2/1/1/1/1/1/2

154/2/1/1/1/1/2

156/1

Chhindwara

Kakai

512/1

Chhindwara

RanginKhapa

314/2

367

Chhindwara

Bohna

303/2

300/1/1

300/1/2

300/2

173/3

156/2

Chhindwara

Chaurai

Chinchgaon

613

662

668

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 20, 2024/ चैत्र 31, 1946

1569

Chhindwara

Chaurai

Machagora

302/5/1

290/1/2,291/2

290/1/4,291/4

290/1/3,291/3

290/1/1,291/1

364/2/2,365/2,366/3

Chhindwara

Chaurai

Singna

88/2

83/3

Chhindwara

Chaurai

Khatkar

364/3,365/3,366/3

Chhindwara

Chaurai

Lohara

286/1,287/1

433/1-436/4

Chhindwara

Chaurai

Mehngora

90/18/1

62/1/1-62/2d

Chhindwara

Chaurai

Ghoghari

218

310/1/2

320-321

Chhindwara

Chaurai

Amaboh

375/1

95/1/1-96/3/1

Chhindwara

Chaurai

Gopalpur

87/3-80/3-84/2-85/2-86/2-87/4-88/14

Seoni

Jam

594/5

590

594/1

Seoni

Chhapara

Bichuwa

49/1/1

23/4

23/3

Seoni

Chhapara

Pipariya

139/3

Seoni

Lakhnadon

Khursipar

65/3,67/2

46/8

65/1

Seoni

Lakhnadon

Jowa

199/2

167

126/2

127/1

Seoni

Lakhnadon

GhoghariKala

263/1

263/8

263/5

263/7

Seoni

Lakhnadon

Mohgaon

105/1/1/1

105/1/1/3

1570

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 20, 2024/CHAITRA 31, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

105/2/1

105/1/4

105/1/3

105/1/2

105/2/1/1

105/2/1/2

105/2/5/1

105/2/5/2

105/2/4/2

105/2/3

105/2/2

Seoni

Lakhnadon

Bhilma

400/1

Seoni

Lakhnadon

Ganeshganj

170/2

176

171

174/1,174/2

Mumbai-Nagpur-Jharsuguda Natural Gas Pipeline

Section- Nagpur – Jabalpur

SCHEDULE

State: Madhya Pradesh

District

Tehsil

Village

Survey No.

Area

Hect.

Are

Sq.

mtr.

Jabalpur

Hulki

198/2

197

Jabalpur

Kaladehi

194

Jabalpur

Mangela

489

492/2

Jabalpur

Bargi

566

Jabalpur

Saliwara

356

363/4

381/1

379

Jabalpur

Basaha

38/2

Jabalpur

Reema

312

306

307

Jabalpur

Basaniya

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 20, 2024/ चैत्र 31, 1946

1571

75/1

73/3

Jabalpur

Siluwa-50

754/1/2

734

708/2

707/1

Jabalpur

Chaukhada

182/2/1

182/2/2

182/3/2

114

115

116

117

Jabalpur

Khamhariya

409

410

414

415

444

402

Jabalpur

Pipariya Kala - 51

13/4

Jabalpur

Kosamghat

374/5

[F. No. L-14014/206/2022-GP - II (E-44561)]

RAMJI LAL MEENA, Under Secy.

िुजि-ृत्र

नई दिल्ली, 5 अप्रैल, 2024

का.आ. 710.—ृेरोजल म और जनि ृाइृलाइन (भूजम में प्र ोक्ता के अजिकार का अिवन) अजिजन म, 1962

(1962 का 50) की िारा 6 की उृिारा (1) के अनुसरण में (इसके बाि इसे उक्त अजिजन म किा ग ा िै), भारत सरकार

एतिट्ठारा ृेरोजल म और प्राकषजतक गैस मंत्राल में भारत सरकार की दिनांक 18.04.2023 की अजिसूचना का.आ.

1841(अ) िो दिनांक 21.04.2023 को भारत के असािारण रािृत्र में प्रकाजित की गई, में संलग्र के प ृ में संिोिन

करती िै।

भारत के रािृत्र में दिनाँक 21.04.2023 को प्रकाजित उक्त रािृत्र अजिसूचना का.आ. 1841(अ) दिनाक

18.04.2023 के अंग्रेिी भाग के ृष्ठ सं्‍ ा 30, 31 & 37 में ग्राम जबाृािल, बाउसेनृाली, ृरजस ान के अंतगवत

जनम्नजलज त सवेक्षण सं्‍ ाओं को आरंभ से अन्तजनर्िवष्ट दक ा िाता िै:

मुंबई-नागृुर-झारसुगुडा प्राकषजतक गैस ृाईृलाइन

न्ड नागृुर-झारसुगुडा

अनुसूची

जिला-झारसुगुड़ा

राज् ; ओजडिा

के स्ट् ान ृर

ृढे

तिसील

गाँव का

नाम

अजिसूजचत

गाँव का

नाम

संिोजित

सबे न

िेकटेर

आर

वगव

जमटर

सबे न

िेकटेर

आर

वगव

जमटर

ल नृुर

जबाृािल

ृंचगा

1572

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 20, 2024/CHAITRA 31, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

106

107

108

108/1090

116/1141

49/787

49/1080

121/744

123/747

124/745

121

124

ल नृुर

बाउसेनृाली

440

कतरबगा

440

373

ल नृुर

ृरजस ान

487

गोसवंिृुर

487

460

458

652

653

458/766

673

674

675

394

677

678

679

679/1371

682/1370

681

681/1372

680

680/1381

686

686/973

687/974

688

689

690

691

[फा. सं. एल-14014/251/2022-िीृी-II (ई-45398)]

रामिी लाल मीना, अवर सजचव

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 20, 2024/ चैत्र 31, 1946

1573

CORRIGENDUM

New Delhi, the 5th, April, 2024

S.O. 710.—In pursuance of sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines

(Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter called the said Act), the Government of

India hereby makes the amendments as Annexed in the notifications of the Government of India in the Ministry of

Petroleum and Natural Gas, S.O. 1841 (E) dated 18.04.2023 published in the Extraordinary Gazette of India on

21.04.2023.

In the said Gazette Notification having S.O. 1841 (E) dated 18.04.2023 published in the Gazette of India on

21.04.2023, in page number 30, 31 & 37 of English Part, the following Survey Number under Bijapali, Bausenpali &

Parisian may be inserted from the beginning.

Mumbai-Nagpur-Jharsuguda Natural Gas Pipeline

Section- Nagpur-Jharsuguda

SCHEDULE

District : Jharsuguda

State : Odisha

For

Read

Name of

Tehsil

Name of

Village

Notified

Name of

Village

Revised

Survey

No.

Hectare

Are

Sq. M.

Survey No.

Hectare

Are

Sq.

Lakhanpur

Bijapali

Panchga

106

107

108

108/1090

116/1141

49/787

49/1080

121/744

123/747

124/745

121

124

Lakhanpur

Bausenpali

440

Katarbaga

440

373

Lakhanpur

Parsian

487

Govindpur

487

460

458

652

653

458/766

673

674

675

394

677

1574

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 20, 2024/CHAITRA 31, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

678

679

679/1371

682/1370

681

681/1372

680

680/1381

686

686/973

687/974

688

689

690

691

[F. No. L-14014/251/2022 -GP-II(E-45398)]

RAMJI LAL MEENA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 5 अप्रैल, 2024

का.आ. 711.—िबदक भारत ljdkj dks yksdghr esa ;g vko';d प्रतीत िोता gS fd

jkT; esa मुंबई–

नागृुर

झारसुगुड़ा नेचरल गैस ृाइृलाइन ंड नागृुर

झारसुगुड़ा ikbiykbu ंड के माध् म से प्राकषजतक गैस के

ृररविन के जलए मेससव गेल (इंजड ा) जलजमटेड }kjk एक ृाइृलाइन fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg,A

vkSj भारत ljdkj dks उक्त ikbi ykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, ि vko';d प्रतीत िोता िै दक ml Hkwfe

ftlesa mDr ikbi ykbu fcNk, tkus dk izLrko gS] bl vf/klwpuk ls सलग्ग्ग्न vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe ds mi;ksx vf/kdkj

dk vtZu दक ा िाए;

vr% vc भारत ljdkj isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbi ykbu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e

1962 ¼1962 का 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, उस भूजम मेsa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj

dk vtZu djus ds vius vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gSA

कोई व्यजक्त, िो mDr vuqlwph मे of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) िै, उस तारी से जिसको उक्त अजिजन म की िारा 3 की

उृिारा (1) के अिीन भारत के jkti= esa ;Fkk izdkf'kr bl vf/klwpuk dh izfr ो lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k dj िी

िाती िै, 21 fnu ds Hkhrj ml Hkwfe के नीचे ikbiykbu जबछाए िानेs की lEca/k esa l{ke izkf/kdkjh Hkqlaiknu ¼,e-,u-ts-

ih-,y- izdYi½ xsy ¼bafM;k½ fyfeVsM] 100] jk.kk gkÅl] 2 jk ekGk] bZLV gk;dksVZ jksM] jkenklisB] ukxiwj & 440010

को जलज त प ृ में vk{ksi भेि ldsxkA

अनुसूची

HkaMkjk

eksgkMh

Mksaxjxkao

1219

1241

1088

[फा. सं. एल-14014/82 /2022-िीृी-II (ई- 42552)]

रामिी लाल मीना, अवर सजचव

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 20, 2024/ चैत्र 31, 1946

1575

New Delhi, the 5th, April, 2024

S.O. 711.—Whereas it appears to Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for transportation

of Natural Gas through Mumbai – Nagpur – Jharsuguda Natural Gas Pipeline Section of Nagpur–Jharsuguda

in the state of Maharashtra, a pipeline should be laid by M/s. GAIL (India) Limited.

And whereas it appears to Government of India that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the Right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is

described in the Schedule annexed to this notification

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipeline (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act 1962 (50 of 1962), Government of India hereby declares

its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule, may within twenty-one days from the date

on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the

Gazette of India, are made available to the General Public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of used

therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority Land Acquisition, (M.N.J.P.L. Project)

GAIL (India) Limited, 100, Rana House, 2^nd Floor, East High Court Road, Ramdaspeth, Nagpur 440010.

Mumbai-Nagpur-Jharsuguda Natural Gas Pipeline

Section - Nagpur – Jharsuguda

SCHEDULE

State: Maharashtra

District

Taluka

Village

Survey No.

Area

Hect.

Are

Sq. mtr.

Bhandara

Mohadi

Dongargaon

1219

1241

1088

[F. No. L-14014/ 82 /2022-GP –II (E- 42552)]

RAMJI LAL MEENA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 5 अप्रैल, 2024

का.आ. 712.—भारत सरकार ने ृेरोजल म और जनि ृाइृलाइन (भूजम में उृ ोग के अजिकार का अिवन)

अजिजन म, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके ृश्चात उक्त अजिजन म किा ग ा िै) की िारा 3 की उृिारा (1) के

अिीन िारी भारत सरकार के ृेरोजल म और प्राकषजतक गैस मंत्राल की अजिसूचना सं्‍ ा का.आ. 462 (अ) तारी

27.01.2022 द्वारा उस अजिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में जवजनर्िवष्ट भूजम में गेल (इजण्ड ा) जलजमटेड द्वारा ओजडसा राज्

में मुंबई-नागृुर-झारसुगुड़ा ृाईृलाइन (एमएनिीृीएल) और स्ट्ृर ृाईृ लाईन के माध् म से प्राकषजतक गैस के ृररविन

के जलए ृाइृलाइन जबछाने के प्र ोिन के जलए उृ ोग के अजिकार का अिवन करने के अृने आि की घोर्णा की ी;

और उक्त रािृजत्रत अजिसूचना की प्रजत ां िनता को उृलब्ि करा िी गई ी; और, सक्षम प्राजिकारी ने, उक्त अजिजन म

की िारा 6 की उृ-िारा (1) के अिीन भारत सरकार को अृनी ररृोटव िे िी िै; और भारत सरकार ने, उक्त ररृोटव ृर

जवचार करने के ृश्चात और ि संतुष्ट िो िाने ृर दक उक्त भूजम ृाइृलाइनें जबछाने के जलए अृेजक्षत िै, उस में उृ ोग के

अजिकार का अिवन करने का जवजनश्च दक ा िै;

अतिः अब, भारत सरकार, उक्त अजिजन म की िारा 6 की उृ-िारा (1) द्वारा प्रित्त्त िजक्त ों का प्र ोग करते

हु े, ि घोर्णा करती िै दक इस अजिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में जवजनर्िवष्ट भूजम में ृाइृलाइनें जबछाने के जलए उृ ोग

के अजिकार का अिवन दक ा िाता िै;

और भारत सरकार, उक्त अजिजन म दक िारा 6 दक उृ-िारा (4) द्वारा प्रित्त िजक्त ों का प्र ोग करते हु े, जनिेि िेती िै

दक ृाइृलाइनें जबछाने के जलए भूजम में उृ ोग का अजिकार, इस घोर्णा के प्रकािन की तारी को, भारत सरकार में

जनजित िोने के बिाए, ृाइृलाइनें जबछाने का प्रस्ट्ताव करने वाली गेल (इजण्ड ा) जलजमटेड में जनजित िोगा और तिुृरर,

भूजम में ऐसे उृ ोग का अजिकार, इस प्रकार अजिरोजृत जनबंिनों और ितों के अिीन रिते हु े, सभी जवल्लंगमों से मुक्त,

गेल (इजण्ड ा) जलजमटेड में जनजित िोगा।

1576

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 20, 2024/CHAITRA 31, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

मुंबई-नागृुर-झारसुगुड़ा प्राकषजतक गैस ृाइृलाइन

अनुभाग-नागृुर-झारसुगुड़ा

अनुसूची

राज़् -ओजडिा

जिला

तिसील

ग्राम

सवे नंबर.

क्षेत्रफल

िेक्टर

आर

वगव मीटर

झारसुगुडा

ल नृुर

गोसवंिृुर

487

460/875

458

652

653

458/766

673

674

675

394

677

678

679

679/1371

682/1370

681

681/1372

680

680/1381

686

686/973

687/974

688

689

690

691

झारसुगुडा

ल नृुर

छुअलीबरना

297

296

[फा. सं. एल-14014/204/2022-िीृी-II (ई-44539)]

रामिी लाल मीना, अवर सजचव

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 20, 2024/ चैत्र 31, 1946

1577

New Delhi, the 5th, April, 2024

S.O. 712.—Whereas by the notification of Government of India in Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas

vide S.O. No. 462 dated 27.01.2022 issued under sub- section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipeline

(Acquisition of Right of Users in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), Government

of India declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that

notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of natural gas through Mumbai-Nagpur-Jharsuguda

Pipeline (MNJPL) & Spur pipeline in the State of Odisha by GAIL (India) Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public;

And, whereas the Competent Authority has, under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted his

report to Government of India;

And whereas Government of India after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land

is required for laying the pipelines, has decided to acquire the Right of User therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act,

Government of India hereby declares that the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this

notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And, further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, Government

of India hereby directs that the Right of User in the land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in

Government of India, vest, on this date of the publication of the declaration, in the GAIL (India) Limited, free from

all encumbrances.

Mumbai-Nagpur-Jharsuguda Natural Gas Pipeline

Section- Nagpur-Jharsuguda

LAND SCHEDULE

STATE: ODISHA

DISTRICT

TEHSIL

VILLAGE

SURVEY NO.

AREA

HECT.

ARE

SQ.

MTR.

Jharsuguda

Lakhanpur

Govindpur

487

460/875

458

652

653

458/766

673

674

675

394

677

678

679

679/1371

682/1370

1578

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 20, 2024/CHAITRA 31, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

681

681/1372

680

680/1381

686

686/973

687/974

688

689

690

691

Jharsuguda

Lakhanpur

Chhualiberna

297

296

[F. No. L-14014/204/2022-GP - II (E- 44539)]

RAMJI LAL MEENA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 15 अप्रैल, 2024

का.आ. 713.—केन् री सरकार, रािभार्ा (संघ के िासकी प्र ोिनों के जलए प्र ोग) जन म, 1976 के जन म

10 के उृजन म (4) के अनुसरण में ृेरोजल म और प्राकषजतक गैस मंत्राल के प्रिासजनक जन ंत्रणािीन सावविजनक क्षेत्र के

उृक्रम के जनम् नजलज त का ावल को, जिसके 80 ा अजिक प्रजतित कमवचारी वषन् ि ने जिन् िी का का वसािक ञानान प्राप् त कर

जल ा िै, अजिसूजचत करती िै:-

कोटा ररटेल क्षेत्री का ावल

(जिन्िुस्ट्तान ृेरोजल म कॉृोरेिन जलजमटेड),

प्लॉट नं. 12, प्र म व जद्वती तल,

गुमानृुरा ृुजलस स्ट्टेिन के ृास, कोटा

जिला-कोटा, राज् – रािस्ट् ान

जृन - 324007

[फा. सं. 11012/3/2021-रा.भा.(2024)]

िोभना श्रीवास्ट् तव, उृ जनिेिक (रािभार्ा)

New Delhi, the 15th, April, 2024

S.O. 713.—In pursuance of Sub Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for official purpose of the

Union) Rules, 1976, the central Government hereby notifies the following office of the Public Sector undertaking

under the administrative control of the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, in which 80 or more percent of the staff

have acquired working Knowledge of Hindi:-

Kota Retail Regional Office,

(Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited),

Plot No. 12, First and Second Floor,

Near Gumanpura Police Station, Kota

District-Kota, State – Rajasthan

Pin - 324007

[F. No. 11012/3/2021-OL(2024)]

SHOBHANA SRIVASTAVA, Dy. Director (OL)

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 20, 2024/ चैत्र 31, 1946

1579

नई दिल्ली, 10 अप्रैल, 2024

का.आ. 714.—vkS?kksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 (a1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS?kksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS?kksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] u a1 चंडीगढ- ds iapkV (73/2018) izdkf”kr djrh gSA

[सं. एल- 41011/12/2018-आई आर(बी-I]

सलोनी, उृ जनिेिक

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 10th, April, 2024

S.O. 714.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 73/2018) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

Chandigarh-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Northern

Railway and their workmen.

[No. 41011/12/2018-IR(B-I]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-I, CHANDIGARH.

Present: Sh. Kamal Kant, Presiding Officer-cum-Link Officer, Chandigarh.

ID No.73/2018

Registered On: 18.10.2018

Dev Shankar Singh Pradhan, Uttar Railway Karmchari Sangh Union (Regd.) Quarter No.124 H Railway Colony,

Jagadhari Workshop, Yamuna Nagar, Haryana-135001.

...........Workman

Versus

The Chief Factory Manager, Northern Railway, Jagadhari Workshop, Distt. Yamuna Nagar, Haryana-135001.

........Management

AWARD

Passed On: 15.02.2024

Central Government vide Notification No. L-41011/12/2018-IR(B-I) dated 03.10.2018 under clause (d) of

Sub-Section (1) sub-section (2) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter called the Act), has

referred the following Industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:-

‘Whether the action of the Management of Chief Factory Manager, Northern Railway, Jagadhari

Workshop, Yamuna Nagar in respect of deduction from the salary of the Workman (List Enclosed-

Annexure-C) since November 2015 under Labour Welfare Fund @Rs.6/- per month is legal and

justified?, If not, what relief the Union Uttar Railway Karamchari Union/ Workman is are entitled to

and from which date’

During the pendency of the proceedings before this Tribunal the case was fixed for filing written statement

by management. Management has not filed any written statement till now. On perusal of the file it is found that

Workman is not responding since 18.05.2020. Which denotes that the workman is not interested in adjudication of the

matter on merits as such, this Tribunal is left with no choice except to pass a ‘No Claim Award’. Accordingly, no

claim award is passed in the present case for the non-prosecution of workman. File after completion be consigned in

the record room.

Let copy of this award be sent to Central Government for publication as required under Section 17 of the

ID Act, 1947.

KAMAL KANT, PO-cum-Link Officer

नई दिल्ली, 15 अप्रैल, 2024

का.आ. 715.—vkS?kksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 (a1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj ृंिाब

नेिनल बैंक ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS?kksfxd fookn esa vkS?kksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je

U;k;ky;]

ds iapkV (24 C of 2022 ) izdkf”kr djrh gSA

[सं. एल-12011/37/2022-आई आर(बी-II]

सलोनी, उृ जनिेिक

1580

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 20, 2024/CHAITRA 31, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 15th, April, 2024

S.O. 715.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 24 C of 2022 ) of the Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Patna

as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Punjab National Bank and

their workmen.

[No. L-12011/37/2022-IR(B-II]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, PATNA.

Reference Case No.:- 24 (C) of 2022

Between the management of the Circle Head, Punjab National Bank, 2^nd Floor, Hotel Regal, East Ramna

Maidan, East Ramna maidan, Arrah, Distt. Bhojpur, Bihar, Bhohpur (Bihar)-802301 and their workman Sri Raj

Kumar (PTS) represented by the President, bank Employees Federation, Bihar, Saboo Complex, 2^nd Floor, Behind

Republic Hotel, Exhibition Road, Patna (Bihar)-800001..

For the management:-

Sri Tarun Prakash, Law Officer, PNB, Arrah.

For the workman:-

Sri B. Prasad, President, Bank Employees Association, Bihar.

Present:-

Manoj Shankar

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal, Patna.

AWARD

Patna, dt- 22nd February, 2024.

By the adjudication order no.- L-12011/37/2022-IR(B-II) New Delhi, dated- 27.05.2022 the Govt. of India

Ministry of Labour New Delhi has referred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of

the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, ( hereinafter to be referred to as “ the Act”) the following dispute between the

management of the Circle Head, Punjab National Bank, 2^nd Floor, Hotel Regal, East Ramna Maidan, East Ramna

maidan, Arrah, Distt. Bhojpur, Bihar, Bhohpur (Bihar)-802301 and their workman Sri Raj Kumar (PTS) represented

by the President, bank Employees Federation, Bihar, Saboo Complex, 2^nd Floor, Behind Republic Hotel, Exhibition

Road, Patna (Bihar)-800001 for adjudication to this tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“ Whether the demand raised by Bank Employee’s Federation, Bihar in his letter dated-01.06.2021 over

denial of regularization and threat of termination of Shri Raj Kumar, Part Time-Sweeper by the management

Punjab National Bank at Lilawachh Branch, Distt Rohtas is legal, just & proper? If yes, what relief the workman

concerned are entitled to?

On receiving the reference notification on 13.06.2022 notice has been issued to both the sides. President,

Bank Employees Federation on behalf of the workman filed representation on 10.08.2022 and statement of claim on

behalf of the workman. On the other hand management authorised Sri Tarun Prakash, Law Officer to represent the

management bank. Record shows that on 22.11.2022 management filed written statement and subsequently both sides

were directed to furnish list of witnesses and documents accordingly. Records shows that during the proceeding law

officer Sri Tarun Prakash apprised to this tribunal, this dispute of the workman is related to the Aurangabad Circle

accordingly this tribunal directed the law officer to inform Aurangabad Circle for the proper representation in the case

and for the furnishing of list of witnesses and documents. But no one turned up from Aurangabad Circle rather Mr.

Tarun Prakash was again authorised to represent the management bank i.e evident from order of 21.09.2023. Order

sheet also shows that workman Raj Kumar for whom dispute is raised by the President, Bank Employees Federation,

Bihar never appeared before this tribunal and did not furnish any documents to his representative to place the same

before this tribunal. When workman showed no interest in the instant case, his representative apprised to this tribunal,

he has no contact with the workman perhaps he has no grievance at all. So necessary order may kindly be passed. It is

also asserted by the representative of the management that since workman is evading his appearance and did not file

any documents inspite of knowing the proceeding so it is clear indication he has no grievance at all so “ No Dispute

Award” may kindly be passed.

Considering all the facts and circumstances of the case and on scrutinizing the proceeding of this case and

the submissions as advanced on behalf of the both the sides, this tribunal finds and hold that this reference is related to

the grievance of workman Raj Kumar for the denial of his regularization and threat of termination by the management

bank the Punjab National Bank. This reference is received to this tribunal on 13.06.2022. Workman once appeared on

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 20, 2024/ चैत्र 31, 1946

1581

10.08.2022 when he put signature on the verification details of the statement of claim that was filed by the

representative Sri B. Prasad, President, Bank Employees Federation Association, Bihar but he never turned up before

this tribunal and did not file any documents and list of witness. Ultimately his representative reported to this tribunal,

he has no contact with the workman Raj Kumar, perhaps he has no grievance at all so necessary order may kindly be

passed. Thus on this score and continuous absence of the workman from 10.08.2022 itself denotes that workman has

no grievance at all with the management bank. So this is the considered opinion of this tribunal, under the aforesaid

circumstances this tribunal has no option than to pass “ No Dispute Award”.So “ is No Dispute Award” passed in this

case. This award is effected after date of publication in gazette.

This is my award accordingly.

Dictated &Corrected by me.

MANOJ SHANKAR, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 15 अप्रैल, 2024

का.आ. 716.—vkS?kksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (a1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

सेंरल बैंक ऑफ इंजड ा ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS?kksfxd fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS?kksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;

ds iapkV (03/2022) izdkf”kr djrh gSA

[सं. एल-39025/01/2024-आई आर(बी-II)-14]

सलोनी, उृ जनिेिक

New Delhi, the 15th, April, 2024

S.O. 716.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 03/2022) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Central Bank of

India and their workmen.

[No. L-39025/01/2024-IR(B-II)-14]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/C/03/2022

Narmada Prasad Tiwari

Village Nipania, Tehsil Nasrullaganj,

District Sehore (Madhya Pradesh)

APPLICANT

VERSUS

The Branch Manager,

Central Bank of India,

Nasrullaganj, District Sehore

(Madhya Pradesh)

NON-APPLICANT

ORDER

Passed on this 09^th day of February 2024

The present petition under section 33(c)(22) of Industrial dispute Act 1947 has been filed by the applicant against the

opposite party, seeking a direction to the opposite party to pay him Rupees 80,000/- (Eighty Thousand Rupees).

According to the applicant, he worked with the management from 01/09/2016 to 30/10/2017 and earned wages

80,000/- (Eighty Thousand Rupees) which he was entitled to get from management which was not paid by management.

He raised various complaints to various officers but of no avail. He has prayed that the management will be directed to pay

this amount with interest.

1582

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 20, 2024/CHAITRA 31, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

In its reply management has stated that the dispute was referred to Regional Labour Commissioner Central Bhopal

and a settlement was reached at between the parties in which management agreed to pay rupees 30,000/- (Thirty

Thousand Rupees) in lieu of all his claim and this amount was paid by management.

Today the applicant filed an affidavit stating that this settlement was the result of misrepresentation and fraud

commitment by him, hence not binding.

Management has not filed any other affidavit except that filed with objection.

I have heard Shri Sailendra Panday for Applicant and Shri S.B Singh of opposite party and perused the record.

The settlement between the parties is binding on them if it is obtained by fraud or miss representation, the applicant

should have got it cancelled by appropriate authority which he did not do.

Hence the settlement is binding on the parties. The payment under the settlement hence been done is not disputed.

Hence in the light of above discussion the petition is dismissed.

P.K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

Dated: 09-02-2024

नई दिल्ली, 15 अप्रैल, 2024

का.आ. 717.—vkS?kksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 (a1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj ूजन न बैंक ऑफ इंजड ा ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS?kksfxd

fookn esa vkS?kksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;]

ds iapkV (18 C of 2021) izdkf”kr djrh gSA

[सं. एल-39025/01/2024-आई आर(बी-II)-15]

सलोनी, उृ जनिेिक

New Delhi, the 15th, April, 2024

S.O. 717.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 18 C of 2021 ) of the Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Patna

as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Union Bank of India and

their workmen.

[No. L-39025/01/2024-IR(B-II)-15]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, PATNA.

Reference Case No.:-18 (C) of 2021

Between the management of the (1)Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer, Union Bank of

India, Central Office, Mumbai Samachar Marg 239, Back Way Reclamation, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021(2)

Regional Manager, Union bank of India, Regional Office, Mohanpur, Samastipur-848101 and their workman Sri Anil

Kumar, S/O- Shri Baleshwar Rai, Vill.- Kuchanh, P.O & P.S- Garakha, Dist.- Saran, Bihar-841311.

For the management:-

Sri Anjani Kumar Mishra, Advocate.

Sri Ambanish Bhardwaj, Advocate.

For the workman:-

Sri B. Prasad, State Secretary, Uco Bank Employees

Association.

Present:-

Manoj Shankar

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal, Patna.

AWARD

Patna, dt- 28^th February, 2024.

By the adjudication order no.- 1/ID(13)/2021/Dy CLC-Pt dated- 20/25.10.2021 the Govt. of India, Ministry

of Labour & Employment, Office of the Dy. Chief Labour Commissioner ( Central ), Maurya Lok Complex, A Block,

2^nd Floor, Room No.-6,16,& 17, Patna-800001 has referred under clause (d) of sub-section-(1) of Section-10 of the

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 20, 2024/ चैत्र 31, 1946

1583

Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, ( hereinafter to be referred to as “the Act”), the following dispute between the

management of the (1) Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer, Union Bank of India, Central Office, Mumbai

Samachar Marg 239, Back Way Reclamation, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021(2) Regional Manager, Union bank of

India, Regional Office, Mohanpur, Samastipur-848101 and their workman Sri Anil Kumar, S/O- Shri Baleshwar Rai,

Vill.- Kuchanh, P.O & P.S- Garakha, Dist.- Saran, Bihar-841311 for adjudication to this tribunal:-

SCHEDULE

“ Whether the action of the management of the then Andhra bank ( now called Union Bank of India ), Mauna

Chowk, Chhapra Branch, Bihar in terminating the services of Shri Anil Kumar,Temporary Peon,

w.e.f01.04.2019, is just and proper? If not, to what relief (s) the workmen concerned is entitled to?

As per the claim of the workman Sri Anil Kumar, asserted in his statement of claim, he was orally appointed

to discharge the duties of a peon in Andhra bank, Mauna Chowk, Chapra from 20.02.2012 as there was a vacant post

of permanent peon. It is also averred Andhra Bank was merged in Union Bank of India. It is further asserted that the

workman was discharging the duties of opening and closing of the bank’s gate, cleaning the bank premises, he used to

discharge the duties of stitching the currency notes and vouchers as per instruction of the branch manager and he used

assist taking the cash box from the chest to the cash counter, besides, this, workman also used to place registers and

books at the staff counter as per the instruction and some times he also discharged the duties of Dak through peon

book. It is further asserted that the workman used to discharge the above duties from 8.00 A.M to 6.P.M regularly. It

is further asserted that initially the workman was being paid wages @ 150/- on weekly basis and later on it was raised

to @ 412/- per day and the same was paid to him on monthly basis but the workman was never paid wages for Sunday

and bank holiday. It is further asserted that the workman was paid wages through debit vouchers of the bank and same

be credited by the bank in his bank account. It is further asserted that workman discharged the duties like a peon in

the said branch from 20.02.2012 to 31.03.2019 regularly but he was stopped from working from 01.04.2019 without

any notice and retrenchment compensation because a fresh hand was appointed by the bank authorities in the said

branch so the termination of the workman is covered u/s- 2(oo) of the I.D.Act. It is also asserted that the action of the

management bank also constitutes unfair labour practice as per schedule-V read with Section-25(T) of the Industrial

Dispute Act, 1947. It is further asserted that the workman met with the management authorities number of occasions

with a prayer of his reinstatement and regularization of his service as a peon but it was never heard by the

management bank then the workman has raised his grievances before the Regional Labour Commissioner (C) Patna

for the conciliation but his dispute was not settled due to non-conciliatory attitude of the management bank ultimately

on failure of conciliation the appropriate government referred this dispute of workman to this tribunal for

adjudication. Thus workman filed his statement of claim with the following prayer of relief :-

(i) Reinstatement in the services of the bank as a temporary peon with back wages and other consequential benefits;

(ii) Regularization of services as a peon;

(iii) Payment of due wages, for the period of working.

(iv) Payment of cost of Rs. 25,000/- for contesting the dispute;

(v) Any other relief(s) as the tribunal deems fit and proper.

On the other hand management Union Bank of India filed written statement stated therein all the allegations

and claim of the workman as asserted in the statement of claim is not specifically admitted it has to be proved by the

workman with proof. It is further asserted that the claim of the workman is not maintainable either on facts or in the

eyes law and is liable to be dismissed as the applicant has not come up before this tribunal with clean hand rather he

has presented a distorted and incorrect facts and tried to mislead to this tribunal. Applicant does not qualify the

ingredients of the valid complaint as envisaged in Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. It is further asserted that the dispute

raised by the applicant cann’t be termed as Industrial Dispute within provision section 2(k) of I.D.Act because the

complainant was not at any point of time a workman as per definition of u/s-2(s) of the I.D.Act. it is further asserted

that there was no relationship between the applicant and bank as employer and employee. Moreover, there was no

contract of service of the management bank with the applicant. It is further asserted that there is no provision in the

management bank of oral appointment because no such appointments can be made by any bank in violations of the

constitutional provisions and guidelines issued by the Government. It is further asserted that due to some exigencies

on account of urgent need, the workman might have been engaged occasionally as casual labour for the period by

paying of remuneration by the then branch manager. So claim of regularization of the applicant is not at all

sustainable as per the order of the Hon’ble Apex Court held in Union of India Vs Vartak Labour Union (2) {(2011)} 4

SCC 200 for causal employees cann’t be regularised in the services and also equal pay as a regular employee. It is

further asserted that the claim of Anil Kumar, he was orally appointed to discharged a duties of a peon from

20.02.2012 which is false and incorrect. No appointment letter for his engagement as an employee has ever been

issued by the management bank. It is further asserted that the claim of the applicant is, he was regularly doing work of

stitching vouchers and carrying of registers are not admitted by the management bank. On the exigency of the

workman this type of the work might be taken by the branch manager from a casual worker as when required. It is

further asserted that branch manager of the bank is neither the bank authority nor authorised to make any recruitment

1584

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 20, 2024/CHAITRA 31, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

in any cadre of the bank. It is further asserted that Anil Kumar has not worked regularly as a casual worker rather as

per requirement of the work, he might have been called to perform particular work for which he has been dullypaid. It

is further asserted that since the workman was never appointed in the service of the bank, so there is no question of

passing any termination order. Accordingly the claim of the applicant and the relief as sought by him is not

sustainable and maintainable that be liable to be dismissed.

On the basis of the statement of claim and written statement of the management sides the following issues

are emerged from there rival contentions:-

(a)

Whether the applicant Anil Kumar come under the purview of the workman as per section-2(s) of

the I.D.Act?

(b) Whether the dispute as raised by the Anil Kumar come under the purview of the I.D.Act as per section-

2(k) of the I.D.Act.?

Chapra Branch, Bihar in terminating the services of Shri Anil Kumar (temporary peon) from 01.04.2019 is

just and proper?

In order to establish his claim the applicant Anil Kumar has casual himself as a witness before this tribunal,

besides oral evidence. The applicant has filed his statement of account bearing account no.- 182410100003819 so the

entries of payment by the bank in his account with marker by the pen i.e Ext.-W and the statement of account from

01.11.2013 to 17.06.2016.

On the other hand management side also examined one witness namely Naveen Roshan Xess as M.W-1 but

no documents is filed on behalf of the management bank.

First of all this tribunal securitizes evidence of workman Sri Anil Kumar ( W.W-1) who deposed before this

tribunal on 07.07.2022 he stated before this tribunal that he was doing work in the Andhra Bank, Mauna Chowk

Chapra Branch from 20.02.20212 to 31.03.2019 and he was stopped from doing work there by the Branch Manager

from 01.04.2019. This witness further stated that he used to come bank at 8.30 A.M and after obtaining the key from

the manager he used open the gate of the branch and he discharged the duties of cleaning of the bank premises and he

was also did hospitality work for the staffsof the branch. He also used to take out the cash box from the strong room at

the instruction of the manager, some times he was sent for the clearing work to the SBI main branch for which he

received the conveyance allowances from the bank. This witness further stated that he was initially paid wages @ Rs.

150/- per day on monthly basis and his wages amount was credited in his bank account by the bank authorities. This

witness further stated that he has furnished copy of the statement of account i.e from 16.04.2012 to 23.12.2017 that

denotes the salary he received from the bank in his account bearing no.- 182410100003819 and same is proved as

Ext.-W. On court question this witness categorically admits that after 09.09.2016 his salary was not credited in his

bank account. This witness further stated that he received the payment through voucher and the vouchers are in the

custody of the bank. This witness further stated that no notice and compensation was given to him by the bank prior to

his termination. In cross-examination this witness categorically admits in para-9 that he did not receive any

appointment letter from the bank rather he was orally deputed by the manager and the branch was newly opened at

that time. This witness admits in para-10 of the cross-examination he was never paid for the day when he did not

perform any duty in the bank. This witness also admits in para-11 that branch manager was having attendance register

for me. In para-14 of the cross-examination this witness categorically stated that on 04.03.2016 Rs. 14021/- was

credited in my account shown as salary and on 07.04.2016 Rs. 9078/- was credited in my account like wise Rs. 5000/

on 04.05.2016 and Rs. 4516/- salary was credited in my account on 11.05.2016. In para-16 of the cross-examination

this witness categorically admits that he has received Rs. 9118/- in his bank account on 31.03.2015 for the work of 23

days.

On the other hand management side also examined namely Navin Roshan Xess (M.W-1) who is senior

manager in Union Bank of India Sikakulam, Andhra Pradesh. He deposed on 10.08.2022 and stated before this

tribunal that he was Branch Manager of Union Bank of India at chapra in the year-2018 at that time it was Andhra

Bank.. This witness further stated that this is the wrong claim of the workman he has discharged his duties

continuously in his bank during his tenure. This witness further stated that no Branch Manager has any authority to

take the services of any workman continuously but manager is empowered to engage any person for the cleaning

purposes as when required. This witness further stated that workman was never appointed in the bank so there is no

question of any termination because when bank does not need any necessity for any daily wager, he can stopped the

workman from doing work further. This witness also admits that what ever the service given by the workman to the

bank, he was paid accordingly.

In cross-examination this witness admitted in para-9 that he was posted at chapra branch from 17.05.2018 to

11.07.2021 and at that time there was no permanent peon and no permanent sweeper in the branch. In para-11 of

cross-examination he admits that as per his knowledge Andhra Bank, Mauna Chowk Branch was opened in the

year-2012. This witness also admits that one Tarkeshwar Ram was posted as permanent peon. In para-13 of the cross-

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 20, 2024/ चैत्र 31, 1946

1585

examination this witness admits that bank can provide the payment details of permanent staff of Tarkeshwar Ram

regarding salary. In para-14 he admits that the Anil Kumar was paid weekly for his work and 2-3 person were

engaged for the bank for the cleaning purposes during his tenure and he does not remember the name of other two

workmen. In para-17 of the cross-examination this witness admits that he paid Rs. 250/- per day to the workmen from

whomtook the services during his tenure. In para-18 this witness admits that wage payment was made through

vouchers and the same is available in the branch. In para-20 of the cross-examination this witness admits that

workman has discharged his duties for 3-4 months during his tenure and the workman was paid cash and in para-22 of

the cross-examination this witness categorically stated that the workman has raised his dispute for the work he

performed during his tenure but he did not participate in the conciliation proceeding because no notice was received.

In para-25 of the cross-examination this witness categorically stated that since no appointment letter was issued to the

workman so there was no need to issue notice pay and compensation.

It is argued on behalf of the workman that Anil Kumar worked with the then Andhra Bank, Mauna Chowk,

Chapra Branch ( now called Union Bank of India ) after merger ) from 20.02.2012 to 31.03.2019 continuously. He

was serving in the said branch upon opening of the branch on 20.02.2012. There was no peon / sweeper in the said

branch. It is further argued that Anil Kumar has status of the workman as per section 2(S) and Union Bank of India, is

an industry as per section 2(J) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. So the claim of the management side, Anil Kumar

was not a workman is totally wrong in the eyes of law. Moreover, Anil Kumar was being paid by the management

bank in his bank account under the salary head i.e endorsed in the statement of bank account given by the workman

Anil Kumar for the period of 01.01.2013 to 09.09.2016 as Ext.-W. It is further argued that workman side had filed a

petition on 25.04.2022 with a request to make a direction to a bank to produce payment vouchers through which Anil

Kumar was getting his wages but nothing is done by the management bank,so adverse inference may kindly be drawn

against the management bank. It is further argued that Anil Kumar worked for more than 240 days preceding his

termination and there is no cogent evidence produced by the management side that could controvert the continuous

working of Anil Kumar from 2012 to 2019. It is also duly corroborated by the workman Anil Kumar in his evidence

before this tribunal. Where he elaborately disclosed about his duties taken by the bank manager and there is nothing in

his cross-examination that could discard the testimony about his continuous work and the payment in his bank

account (Ext.-W) and thus the termination of the workman from 01.04.2019 is covered u/s 2(OO) of the I.D.Act.

Since management did not comply the mandatory provision of issuing notice and compensation before termination of

the workman so management also violated the provision of section 25(F), 25(G) and 25(H) of the I.D.Act and the

action of the management constituted unfair labour practice too. It is further argued that management did not produce

any documentary evidence and moreover the evidence of the only management witness also corroborates the claim of

the workman, as management witness clearly stated there was no permanent peon / sweeper posted in the said branch.

The claim of the workman he was orally appointed by the then branch manager upon opening of the Andhra Bank (

now called Union Bank of India ) in the year 2012 at Mauna Chowk Branch and the claim of his continuous working

till 31.03.2019 has been duly established by the workman by way of documentary and oral evidence is not countered

by the management bank.So Anil Kumar is entitled for his reinstatement in the service of the bank as a temporary

peon with back wages and other consequential benefits and further to regularise his service.

10.

On the other hand it is argued from the management side that the claim of the workman Anil Kumar, he was

working in the Andhra Bank, Mauna Chowk Bazar Branch ( now called Union Bank of India ) from 20.02.2012 to

31.03.2019 continuously is totally false rather bank took his service as when required for which he was duly paid.It is

argued that there was no employer and employee relationship between the management and workman Anil Kumar.

Since the Anil Kumar was not employee of the bank so there is no need to giving notice or notice pay and thus

management bank did not violate any provision of I.D.Act. It is also argued that temporary / causal worker can not

claim his appointment as a matter of right because bank has set procedure for the appointment of class IV & class III

of employees and no bank manager is empowered to make any appointment in the bank, but bank manager is

empowered to take service of causal worker for the cleaning purpose as and when required and for which bank pay to

the worker from whom bank took service. Anil Kumar was also a causal worker, his service was taken by the bank as

and when required.So his claim is not sustainable at all.

11.

Considering the all the facts & circumstances of the case and the material available on the record and the oral

and documentary evidence as placed by the rival parties and further the submissions as advanced by both the sides,

this tribunal finds that the issue raised the management in its written statement that Anil Kumar is not a workman as

per the provision of 2(S) of the I.D.Act because his service was taken as and when required. However, workman Anil

Kumar claims he started working in the Andhra Bank of Mauna Chowk Chapra Branch upon opening of the branch

from 20.02.2022 at the oral instruction and consent given by the then branch manager and he contrivedhis service till

31.03.2019 buthe stopped from working from 01.04.2019. This tribunal further finds that section 2(S) of the I.D.Act

defines about status of workman :- [ (S) “workman” means any person ( including an apprentice ) employed in

any industry to do any manual, unskilled, skilled, technical, operational, clerical or supervisory work for hire

or reward, whether the terms of employment be express or implied, and for the purpose of any proceeding

under this Act in relation to an industrial dispute, includes any such person who has been dismissed,

1586

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 20, 2024/CHAITRA 31, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

discharged or retrenched in connection with, or as a consequence of, that dispute, or whose dismissal,

discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person—

(i)

Who is subject to the Air Force, Act, 1950 (45 of 1950 ), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950 ), or the Navy

Act, 1957 (62 or 1957 ); or

(ii)

Who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a prison, or

(iii)

Who is employed mainly in a managerial or administrative capacity, or

(iv)

who, being employed in a supervisory capacity, draws wages exceeding 56a [ ten thousand rupees ] per

mensem or exercise, either by the nature of the duties attached to the office or by reason of the powers vested in him,

functions mainly of a managerial nature.]

On careful perusal of section 2(S) of the I.D.Act, Anil Kumar comes under the purview of 2(S) and so he attains the

status of workman as per section-2(S) of the I.D.Act, he was orally appointment in the concerned bank and for which

he was being paid by the bank authorities so this tribunal finds no force in the contention of the management side.

This tribunal further finds that workman Anil Kumar thoroughly compute his claim of working in the Adhra Bank

from 20.02.2012 in the ( Union Bank of India ) of its Mauna Chowk Chapra Branch as a temporary worker on being

orally appointed by the then Branch Manager and he was giving service in the said branch continuously upto

31.03.2019 and this evidence is not controverted by the management bank from any corner moreover, workman Anil

Kumar has given statement of bank account (Ext.-W) i.e from 01.11.2013 to 17.06.2016 to show his wages was being

credited in his account by the bank under salary head. On scrutinizing the entire of his statement of bank account this

tribunal finds that the entry of 01.11.2013 shows he received Rs. 4136/- denoting the salary for October 2013. The

entry of 01.10.2013 also shows the salary for the September 2013 the entry of 01.01.2014 is shown daily wages for

September 2013 @ 150/- per day like wise the entry of 02.02.2013 amounting Rs. 4124/- amount daily wager for

November 2013, some entries like 18.01.2014, 28.12.2013, 20.12.2013, 30.11.2013, 23.11.2013, 16.11.2013,

12.11.2013 are showing conveyance paid to the workman in his account. The statement of account of the workman

Ext.-W clearly established this factsthat Anil Kumar has given his service to the bank as per need continuously that’s

why he was being paid in his bank account showing salary head and daily wages and conveyance.So his claim of his

giving service to the bank as a temporary peon right from February 2012 to 2016 cann’t be ruled out. Moreover,

workman Anil Kumar categorically stated in his evidence but he was being paid cash for his service from the year

2016 till 31.12.2019 and this is not controverted by the bank management. From perusal of the evidence as placed by

the workman and management it is established that there was no permanent peon / sweeper posted in the said branch,

Mauna Chowk Branch of Andhra Bank ( now called Union Bank of India after merger ) that’s why bank management

took the services of Anil Kumar continuously and taking the service of Anil Kumar regularly from year 2012 clearly

establishes management bank was in need of service of Anil Kumar i.e clearly gets corroborating by the payment by

the bank management in the saving bank account of the workman Anil Kumar ( Ext.-W). This tribunal further finds

and hold that Anil Kumar was engaged by the management bank as sub-staff on regular basis from 2012 to

31.03.2019 and he gave his services more than six years continuously.Under the circumstancesit can be safely

inferred, the bank was needed the service of Anil Kumar and utilized his service as sub-staff in the absence of

permanent peon / sweeper. Thus Anil Kumar the workman has succeeded in proving he has discharged the duties with

the management bank more than 240 days on the preceding years from his termination date 01.04.2019 and that is not

controverted by the bank either oral or by documentary evidence.Section 25(B) defines about the continuous

service :-

(1)

a workman shall be said to be in continuous service for a period if he is, for that period, in

uninterrupted service, including service which may be interrupted on account of sickness or authorised leave

or an accident or a strike which is not illegal, or a lock-out or a cessation of work which is not due to any fault

on the part of the workman;

(2)

where a workman is not in continuous service within the meaning of clause (1) for a period of one year

or six month, he shall be deemed to be in continuous service under an employer—

(a)

for a period of one year, if the workman, during a period of twelve calendar months preceding the

date with reference to which calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the employer for not less

than—

(i)

one hundred and ninety days in the case of a workman employed below ground in a time; and

(ii)

two hundred and forty days, in any other case;

So claim of the workman is very much covered u/s-25(B) about his continuous service with the management bank and

thus management bank violated the mandatory provision 25(F) of the I.D.Act because Anil Kumar was not given any

notice or notice pay, compensation by the bank management that is duly established through his evidence. This

tribunal further finds that taking service of the Anil Kumar ss the sub-staff by the management bank continuously for

more than six years without giving him any benefits as a regular employee comes under the provision of the 25(T) of

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 20, 2024/ चैत्र 31, 1946

1587

the I.D.Act. This role of the bank against the workman Anil Kumar is a kind of unfair labour practice i.e prohibited as

per section 25(T) of the I.D.Act.

12.

On the ultimate analysis of the facts and circumstances of the case and the materials available on the record

as discussed above, this tribunal finds and hold that workman Anil Kumar has thoroughly proved his claim regarding

his continuous service from 20.02.2012 in the Andhra Bank, Mauna Chowk Chapra Branch since its opening now it is

called ( Union Bank of India ) till 31.03.2019 by way of oral and documentary evidence and before taking his service

by the bank management Anil Kumar was not given any notice, notice pay and compensation by the management

bank. Under the aforesaid circumstances after utilizing the services of Anil Kumar for more than 240 days in a several

calendar years preceding31.03.2019.The action of the management bank in terminating of Sri Anil Kumar without

compliance of 25(F) of the I.D.Act cann’t be justified and legal. Accordingly, this is the considered opinion of this

tribunal that Anil Kumar is entitled for reinstatement in the service of the bank from 01.04.2019 as a temporary peon

with all back wages and other consequential benefits and he is also entitled for regularization of his service as per

bank rules. Thus management bank is directed to reinstate the workman Anil Kumar in the service of the bank as

temporary employee with all back wages and consequential benefits from 01.04.2019 within two months from the

date of publication of this award.This award is effected after date of publication in gazette.

This is my award accordingly.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

MANOJ SHANKAR, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 15 अप्रैल, 2024

का.आ. 718.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (a1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj बैंक

ऑफ इंजड ा ds izca/kra=] laca) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la- (33/2015,22/2015,92/2016) dks izdkf”kr djrh gSA

[सं. ,y-12011/94/2014- vkbZ vkj (ch-II)

[सं. ,y-12011/90/2014- vkbZ vkj (ch-II)

[सं. ,y-12012/46/2016- vkbZ vkj (ch-II)]

सलोनी, उृ जनिेिक

New Delhi, the 15th, April, 2024

S.O. 718.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 33/2015,22/2015,92/2016) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Bank of India

and their workmen.

[No. L-12011/94/2014- IR (B-II)

[No.L-12011/90/2014-IR(B-II)

[No.L-12012/46/2016-IR(B-II)]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/33/2015

NO. CGIT/LC/R/22/2015

NO. CGIT/LC/R/92/2016

Present: P.K.Srivastava, H.J.S..( Retd)

CASE NO. CGIT/LC/R/33/2015

The General Secretary

Dainik Vetan Bhogi Bank Karmchari Sangathan,

F-1, Tripati Vihar,

Opp. Engg. College, Ujjain

… Workman

1588

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 20, 2024/CHAITRA 31, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Versus

Bank of India,

Zonal Office,18 Shanku Marg,Freeganj,

Ujjain,Bhopal (M.P.)

…Management

CASE NO. CGIT/LC/R/22/2015

The General Secretary

Dainik Vetan Bhogi Bank Karmchari Sangathan,

F-1, Tripati Vihar,

Opp. Engg. College, Ujjain

… Workman

Versus

The Branch Manager,

Bank of India, Kanad Branch,

Shajapur (Distt.)

…Management

CASE NO. CGIT/LC/R/92/2016

The General Secretary

Dainik Vetan Bhogi Bank Karmchari Sangathan,

F-1, Tripati Vihar,

Opp. Engg. College, Ujjain-456010

…Workman

Versus

The Bank of India,

Zonal Office, C-2, Kshipra Vihar

Dewas Road, Nagzhiri

Ujjain – 456010

…Management

AWARD

(Passed on this 7^th day of February-2024.)

In case number R/33/2015, Government Of India, Ministry of Labour vides it letter Number

L-12011/94/2014 (IR(B-II)) dated 27/02/2015 has sent following reference for adjudication –

"क् ा बैंक ऑफ इंजड ा, िा ा कनाड ज़िला िािाृुर ़िोनल ऑदफस उज्जैन म.प्र. द्वारा श्री अिोक कुमार िेिाई को

01.11.2010 से 16.05.2012 तक काम करवाकर जबना दकसी नोरटस ा मुआविा के काम से प्र क कर िेना औ.जव.अजि.

के अंतगवत न् ा ोजचत िै? अगर निीं तो श्री अिोक िेिाई दकस अनुतोर् के अजिकार िै ?"

In case number R/22/2015, Government Of India, Ministry of Labour vides it letter Number

L-12011/90/2014 (IR(B-II)) dated 17/02/2015 has sent following reference for adjudication –

"Whether the demand of union claiming difference of wages in favour of Shri Ashok Kumar Desai,

daily wage employee from 23.04.11 to 16.05.12 is justified or not? What relief the daily wager is

entitled for?"

In case number R/92/2016, Government Of India, Ministry of Labour vides it letter Number

L-12012/46/2016 (IR(B-II)) dated 26/09/2016 has sent following reference for adjudication –

"1) Whether the demand made by the Union for payment of Bonus in respect of Mr. Ashok Desai (Daily wage

worker) by the Bank of India, For the period from 24-11-2010 to 7-1-2012=89 days Rs. 664/- and for the period from

6-7-2011 to 16-5-2012-300 days Rs. 5278/- total amount due Rs. 3942/- is justified or not? 2) Whether the statement

made by the Bank of India they have already paid Bonus for year 2010-11for 65 days Rs. 120 And for 2011-12 for

226 days for Rs. 4520/- and that nothing is due now is correct or not? 3) Finally, how much amount of Bonus is still

due to be paid to Mr. Ashok Desai for the years 2010-11 and 2011-12 by the Bank of India. "

After registering a cases on the basis of the references, notices were issued to the parties. They appeared and

filed their respective statements of claim and defence.

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 20, 2024/ चैत्र 31, 1946

1589

Case of the workman is that he was appointed by the Branch Manager as peon on November 1, 2010 under

his oral orders. His wages were Rs. 40/-per day, which was increased from time to time. He worked as as per the

directions of the Branch Manager his work was that of a peon. He was disengaged by management on May 16 2012

without notice or compensation, which is in violation of section 25F of Industrial Disputes act 1947, hereinafter

referred to by the word’ Act’. It is his case that he worked for a period of more than 240 days in every year, including

the year preceding the date of his disengagement. He raised a dispute. After failure of conciliation, the reference was

made by the Central government to this tribunal. Accordingly, the workman has prayed that, he be reinstated with all

back wages and benefits, holding his disengagement against law.

In the case R/22/2015, the workman side has claimed parity in wages with regular employees doing the

same job in the light of the Bi-partite Settlement on the basis of same allegations.

In the case R/92/2016, the workman side has claimed increased bonus amount on the allegations that he

worked for 89 days from 24/11/2010 to 07/01/2012 Rs 664/-,for the period from 06/07/2011 to 06/05/2012 for 300

days Rs 5378/-,thus total amount Rs 5942/-.

The case of management. In short, is that firstly, the Workman is not a workman as defined under section

2(s) of the Act. Secondly, he was not appointed against any vacancy following any recruitment procedure. He was

simply a daily wager casual labour, who was engaged as and when required and was paid his wages accordingly. He

never completed 240 days in any year, including the year preceding the date of his earliest disengagement. Hence, his

disengagement is not against law. It is further, the case of management that in the year preceding the date of his

disengagement. That is 2011-2012, he worked only for 226 days. He worked only for a period of 65 days in the year

2010- 2011. The management has rebutted the claim of the workman regarding pay parity on the ground that the

Bipartite Settlement is applicable with respect to only the regular employees of the management Bank. Hence, only

the regular employees of the management are entitled to get wages and salaries as mentioned in the Bipartite

Settlement. According to management, since the workman in the case in hand was a casual daily wager labour,

required to work to the Bank as and when required, parity regarding wages in the light of bipartite settlement was not

legally admissible to him. Accordingly, it has prayed that the references be answered against the Workman.

Since the parties in these references are the same and their claims are based on identical facts, hence these

references are being answered by common award.

In evidence, the workman has filed some photocopy documents which are different letters regarding Internal

communications in the bank and to the president of the union as well, reply submitted by bank before the Assistant

Labour Commissioner, which are Ex W1 to Ex W4. The workman has further filed photocopy vouchers which have

been denied by management and have been proved by the Workman by way of secondary evidence.

The workman has filed his affidavit in his evidence and has been cross-examined by management.

Management has filed the affidavit of its witness. He has been cross-examined by workman.

I have heard arguments from both the learned counsels of Workman and Management. I have gone through

the record as well.

Following issues arise in these cases in hand for determination. They are-

1- Whether the Workman has successfully completed 240 days in continuous service of the management bank

as claimed by in any year, including the year preceding the date of his disengagement?

2- Whether the disengagement of the workman is against law?

3- Whether the workman is entitled to get difference of salary as claimed by him?

4- Whether the workman is entitled to get bonus as claimed by him?

5- Whether the Workman is entitled to any relief in these cases?

Issue number one-

Before entering into any discussion, section 2(s) of the act , section 25B and section 25F & 25G of the Act

are required to be reproduced and are being reproduced as follows –

Section 2(S)-

“workman” means any person (including an apprentice) employed in any industry to do any manual,

unskilled, skilled, technical, operational, clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward, whether the terms of

employment be express or implied, and for the purposes of any proceeding under this Act in relation to an

industrial dispute, includes any such person who has been dismissed, discharged or retrenched in connection

with, or as a consequence of, that dispute, or whose dismissal, discharge or retrenchment has led to that

dispute, but does not include any such person-

1590

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 20, 2024/CHAITRA 31, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(i)

Who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of

1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or

(ii)

Who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a prison, or

(iii)

Who is employed mainly in a managerial or administrative capacity, or

(iv)

Who, being employed in a supervisory capacity, draws wages exceeding one thousand six

hundred rupees per mensem or exercises, either by the nature of the duties attached to the

office or by reason of the powers vested in him, functions mainly of a managerial nature.

Section 25 B:-Definition of continuous service.- For the purposes of this Chapter,--

(1) A workman shall be said to be in continuous service for a period if he is, for that period, in

uninterrupted service, including service which may be interrupted on account of sickness or authorised

leave or an accident or a strike which is not illegal, or a lock-out or a cessation of work which is not

due to any fault on the part of the workman;

(2) Where a workman is not in continuous service within the meaning of clause (1) for a period of one

year or six months, he shall be deemed to be in continuous service under an employer-

(a) For a period of one year, if the workman, during a period of twelve calendar months preceding the

date with reference to which calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the employer for

not less than-

(i) One hundred and ninety days in the case of a workman employed below ground in a mine; and

(ii) Two hundred and forty days, in any other case;

(b) For a period of six months, if the workman, during a period of six calendar months preceding the

date with reference to which calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the employer for

not less than-

(i) Ninety-five days, in the case of a workman employed below ground in a mine; and

(ii) One hundred and twenty days, in any other case.

25F. Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen.- No workman employed in any industry who has been

in continuous service for not less than one year under an employer shall be retrenched by that employer until-

(a) The workman has been given one month's notice in writing indicating the reasons for retrenchment and

the period of notice has expired, or the workman has been paid in lieu of such notice, wages for the

period of the notice:

(b) The workman has been paid, at the time of retrenchment, compensation which shall be equivalent to

fifteen days' average pay 2[for every completed year of continuous service] or any part thereof in

excess of six months; and

be specified by the appropriate Government by notification in the Official Gazette.]

25G. Procedure for retrenchment.- Where any workman in an industrial establishment, who is a citizen of

India, is to be retrenched and he belongs to a particular category of workmen in that establishment, in the

absence of any agreement between the employer and the workman in this behalf, the employer shall ordinarily

retrench the workman who was the last person to be employed in that category, unless for reasons to be

recorded the employer retrenches any other workman.

25N. Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen.-

(1) No workman employed in any industrial establishment to which this Chapter applies, who has been in

continuous service for not less than one year under an employer shall be retrenched by that employer until,- (a)

the workman has been given three months' notice in writing indicating the reasons for retrenchment and the

period of notice has expired, or the workman has been paid in lieu of such notice, wages for the period of

notice; and (b) the prior permission of the appropriate Government or such authority as may be specified by

that Government by notification in the Official Gazette (hereafter in this section referred to as the specified

authority) has been obtained on an application made in this behalf.

Rule 77. Maintenance of seniority list of workmen:-The employer shall prepare a list of all workmen in the

particular category from which retrenchment is contemplated to be arranged according to the seniority of their

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 20, 2024/ चैत्र 31, 1946

1591

service in that category and cause a copy thereof to be pasted on a notice board in a conspicuous place in the

premises of the industrial establishment at least seven days before the actual date of retrenchment.

Admitted is the fact between the parties that the workman was a daily wager casual labour, working with the

management. Parties are at a difference on the point whether the Workman completed 240 days or more in continuous

service as mentioned above in any year or year preceding the date of his disengagement.

Learned counsel for the workman has submitted that the workman had filed photocopy documents and has

also filed an application seeking direction to management to file documents mentioned in the application. He further

summits that since the documents in original are in custody of the management and were not filed in spite of direction

of the tribunal, adverse inference will be drawn against the management that had these documents been filed, they

would have been against the case of management. Learned counsel further summits that the workman has discharged

its initial burden to prove that he was in continuous engagement of management for 240 days in every year, and now

it was further management to disprove this fact.

Learned counsel has relied on following decisions of the Supreme Court –

1-Director fisheries Department Vs Bhikhubhai Meghaji bhai Chawda 2010(2) MP LJ 30 para15.

2-Gaurishankar Vs State Of Rajsthan 2016 (1) SCC(L&S)546 para 20,21,&22

3-Ajaipal Singh Vs Haryana Warehousing Corpn (2015)6 SCC 321 para 9& 19

The perusal of the record shows that the workman had filed application for production of documents. The

management filed written reply to the application. This application was heard and decided by my learned predecessor,

while his order dated August 10, 2017. This order goes to show that in compliance of order of this Tribunal dated

November 10, 2016 and the documents for the period of 2012. Rest of the documents not available. The workman

was granted opportunity to prove the photocopy documents filed by him by way of secondary evidence which he did

avail. In these circumstances, the case laws, referred to from the workman side do not help him.

In his affidavits, the workman has stated that he worked continuously for a period of 240 days in every year.

He has further stated that he worked for the period of 89 days from 24/11/2010 to 07/01/2012 & for the period from

06/07/2011 to 06/05/2012 for 300 days. He has filed photocopy vouchers. I have gone through the vouchers. These

are of different years not in the regular setting these vouchers do corroborate the statement of the workman that he

worked with the management, but they do not corroborate his this is statement that he worked continuously for a

period of 240 days in any year, including the year preceding the date of his disengagement. On the other hand,

management witness has categorically stated that the Workman worked for a period of less than 240 days in the year

preceding the date of his disengagement and also that he never completed 240 days in continuous service in any year.

He has also stated in his affidavit that the workman worked for 65 days only during the period of 2010-2011. This

witness has been cross-examined by workman side but there is nothing to discredit him.

On the basis of above discussion, the case of the workman that he continuously worked for 240 days in any

year, including the year preceding the date of his disengagement is held not proved.

Further, the claim of the workman that he worked for 89 days in 2010-2011 & 300 days in 2011-2012 is also

held not proved.

Issue no. one is answered accordingly.

Issue number two –

On the basis of finding recorded on issue number one, the disengagement of the workman is held not in

violation of any law and the issue is answered accordingly.

Issue number three-

There is no mention of daily wagers in the Bipartite Settlement, 1966. Only the regular cadre employees

have been mentioned in the settlement and have been made entitled to get pay and wages as mentioned in the

1592

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 20, 2024/CHAITRA 31, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

settlement. Hence, the applicant Workman in the case in hand, is held not entitled to pay parity with regular

employees of the Bank and issue number three is answered accordingly.

Issue number four-

On the basis of findings recorded on issue number one, the claim of the workman regarding enhanced bonus

is held not tenable in law and this issue is answered accordingly.

Issue number five -

On the basis of findings recorded on issue number one and two, the Workman is held entitled to know relief

as claimed by him in these three case and the issue is answered accordingly.

AWARD

Holding the action of management is not against any law, the reference in the case No R/33/2015 is

answered against the Workman. The workman is held entitled to no relief.

In the case R/22/2015 & R/92/2016 also the workman is held entitled to no relief and these references are

answered accordingly.

A copy of this award be kept in all the three cases.

No order as to cost.

Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.

DATE: 07/02/2024

P.K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 vizSy] 2024

का.आ. 719.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (a1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

राष्ट्री आवास बैंक ds izca/kra=] laca) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] I - दिल्ली ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la-155/2018) dks izdkf”kr djrh gSA

[सं. ,y-12011/46/2017- vkbZ vkj (ch-II)]

सलोनी, उृ जनिेिक

New Delhi, the 16th, April, 2024

S.O. 719.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 155/2018) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court -I

Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of National Housing Bank and

their workmen.

[No. L-12011/46/2017- IR(B-II)]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT DELHI - 1

ID No.155/2018

Sh. Yashveer Singh & others

Through All India General Mazdoor Trade Union (Regd),

170, Bal Mukund Khand, Giri Nagar,

Kalkaji, New Delhi-110019

…Claimant

Versus

1. National Housing Bank,

Core A, India Habitat Centre,

Lodhi Road,

New Delhi-110003

2. M/s SOMC Cavaliers Pvt. Ltd.,

No.73, Jambo House, 1^st Floor,

Okhala Phase-III,

New Delhi-110020.

…Management

[भाग II— ण् ड3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : अप्रैल 20, 2024/ चैत्र 31, 1946

1593

None for the claimant

Sh. Aseem Kumar Sahay, A/R for the management no.1

None for the management no. 2.

AWARD

In the present case, a reference was received from the appropriate Government vide letter

No.L-12011/46/2017-IR(B-II)) dated 15.02.2018 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section

10 of the Act, for adjudication of a dispute, terms of which are as under:

SCHEDULE

“Whether the 11 point demands(Annexure-A) raised by Sh. Yasveer Singh and 11 others through All India

General Mazdoor Trade Union, New Delhi against (1) National Housing Bank, Lodhi Road, N.D.(Main

Employer), (2) M/s SOMC Cavaliers Pvt. Ltd., N.D. (Contractor) are legal, fair and justified? If yes, What

relief the workman are entitled to?”

In the reference order, the appropriate Government commanded the parties raising the dispute to file

statement of claim, complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses with this Tribunal within 15 days

of receipt of the reference order and to forward a copy of such statement of claim to the opposite parties involved in

the dispute. Claim statement filed, rebuttal written statement filed on behalf of the management no. 2.

Rejoinder filed by the claimant on August 26, 2019 and issues were framed. Case was listed for claimant

evidence on 21.11.2019. After that, claimant evidence was not filed. And also not present the claimant, despite

providing a number of opportunities, claimant have not appeared to substantiate his claim.

Hence, in these circumstances this tribunal has no option except to pass the no disputant award. No disputant

award is passed accordingly. File is consigned to the record room. A copy of this award is hereby send to the

appropriate government for notification under section 17 of the I.D. Act, 1947.

Date: 12.02.2024

Justice VIKAS KUNVAR SRIVASTAVA (Retd.), Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 16 vizSy] 2024

का.आ. 720.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (a1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

राष्ट्री आवास बैंक ds izca/kra=] laca) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] I - दिल्ली ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 10/2018) dks izdkf”kr djrh gSA

[सं. ,y-12011/47/2017- vkbZ vkj (ch-II)]

सलोनी, उृ जनिेिक

New Delhi, the 16th, April, 2024

S.O. 720.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 10/2018) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court -I

Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of National Housing Bank and

their workmen.

[No. L-12011/47/2017- IR(B-II)]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM-LABOUR COURT DELHI - 1

ID No.10/2018

Sh. Yashvir Singh & 11 others

Through All India General Mazdoor Trade Union (Regd),

170, Bal Mukund Khand, Giri Nagar,

Kalkaji, New Delhi-110019

… Claimant

1594

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 20, 2024/CHAITRA 31, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Versus

1. National Housing Bank,

Core A, India Habitat Centre,

Lodhi Road,

New Delhi-110003

2. M/s. SOMC Cavaliers Pvt. Ltd.,

No.73, Jambo House, 1^st Floor,

Okhala Phase-III,

New Delhi-110020.

…Management

None for the claimant

Sh. Aseem Kumar Sahay, A/R for the management no.1

None for the management no. 2.

AWARD

In the present case, a reference was received from the appropriate Government vide letter No.L-12011/47/2017

IR (B-II)) dated 26.12.2017 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Act, for

adjudication of a dispute, terms of which are as under:

SCHEDULE

1. “Whether the Management of National Housing bank and the Contractor M/s SOMC Cavaliers Pvt. Ltd.,

is liable for violation of Section 33 of the Industrial Dispute Act.”

2. If yes, whether the workmen i.e. 1. Sh. Yashvir Singh S/o Sh. Jaipal Singh 2. Sh. Satayanarayan Jaiswal

S/o Sh. Banwari 3. Sh. Anil Kumar Sharma S/o Sh. Hari Krishan Dev 4. Sh. Surender Prasad Singh S/o

Late Sh. Yamuna Prasad Singh 5. Sh. Ravinder Kumar Rao S/o Sh. Veer Bhadur Rao 6. Sh. Munna Yadav

S/o Sh. Rampati Yadav 7. Sh. Satender Upadhyay S/o Sh. Sarvesh 8. Sh. Shalesh Kumar Pandey S/o

Sh. Param Hans Pandey 9. Sh. Prabhat Sharma S/o Late Sh. Ram Ashish Sharma 10. Sh. Shyam Sunder

Ojha S/o Sh. Sanjay Kumar Ojha and 11. Sh. Rama Kant Singh S/o Sh. Bhagya Narayan alleged to have

worked form 01/11/1995 to August, 2014 are entitled for reinstatement with all consequential benefits, if

is proved that their services were terminated without following due procedure.

3. “What other relief the said workmen are entitled to.?”