5449 GI/2024
(3779)
रजिस्ट्री सं. डी.एल. (एन) 04/0007/2003—05
REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05
xxxGIDHxxx
xxxGIDExxx
प्राजिकार से प्रकाजित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप् ताजिक
WEEKLY
सं. 35]
नई दिल् ली, जसतम् बर 1—जसतम् बर 7, 2024, िजनवार/भाद्र 10—भाद्र 16, 1946
No. 35]
NEW DELHI, SEPTEMBER 1— SEPTEMBER 7, 2024, SATURDAY/BHADRA 10– BHADRA 16, 1946
इस भाग में जभन् न ृष् सं् ा िी िाती िज जिससे दक ि ृष क संकलन के प ृ में र ा िा सके
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग II— ण् ड 3—उृ- ण् ड (ii)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)
भारत सरकार के मंत्राल ों (रक्षा मंत्राल को छोड़कर) द्वारा िारी दकए गए सांजवजिक आिेि और अजिसूचनाएं
Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India
(Other than the Ministry of Defence)
जवत्त मंत्राल
(जवत्ती सेवाएं जवभाग)
नई दिल्ली, 19 िुलाई, 2024
का.आ. 1682.—बैंककारी कंृनी (उृक्रमों का अिजन और अंतरण) अजिजन म, 1970 की िारा 9 की उृ-िारा
(3) के ंड (क) के ृरन्तुक द्वारा प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, केन्द्री सरकार, एतद्द्वारा, इंजड न बैंक के प्रबंि
जनिेिक एवं मु् का जकारी अजिकारी (एमडी एवं सीईओ) श्री िाजन्त लाल िजन (िन्म जतज िः 1.1.1965) के का जकाल
को दिनांक 1.9.2024 से 31.12.2024 तक अ वा अगले आिेिों तक, िो भी ृिले िो, बढाती िज।
[ई फा. सं. 4/1/2021-बीओ-I]
जवि िंकर जतवारी, अवर सजचव
सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-11092024-257079
CG-DL-W-11092024-257079
3780
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :SEPTEMBER 7, 2024/BHADRA 16, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Financial Services)
New Delhi, the 19th July, 2024
S.O. 1682.—In exercise of powers conferred by the proviso to clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 9 of
the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, Central Government hereby extends
the term of Shri Shanti Lal Jain (date of birth: 1.1.1965), Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer (MD &
CEO), Indian Bank w.e.f. 01.09.2024 to 31.12.2024, or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[eF. No. 4/1/2021-BO-I]
VIJAY SHANKAR TIWARI, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 5 अगस्ट् त, 2024
का.आ. 1683.—राष्ट्री कषत बैंक (प्रबंि और प्रकीणज उृबंि) स्ट्कीम, 1970 के ृजरा 3 के उृ-ृजरा (1) के सा
ृठ त बैंककारी कंृनी (उृक्रमों का अिजन और अंतरण) अजिजन म, 1970 की िारा 9 की उृ-िारा (3) के ंड (ग) द्वारा
प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, केन्द्री सरकार, एतद्द्वारा, उि सारणी के कॉलम (2) में जवजनर्िजष्ट व्यजि ों के स्ट् ान
ृर नीचे िी गई सारणी के कॉलम (3) में जवजनर्िजष्ट व्यजि ों को कॉलम (1) में जवजनर्िजष्ट बैंकों के बोडज में तत्काल प्रभाव से
और अगले आिेिों तक, जनिेिक नाजमत करती िज:-
क्रम सं.
(1)
(2)
(3)
1
केनरा बैंक
श्री आर. केश्वन
श्री रोजित िास (िन्म जतज : 28.9.1970)
2
ूको बैंक
श्री रािेि कुमार
डॉ. एस. ृी. मोिन्ती (िन्म जतज : 1.7.1972)
[फा.सं. 6/3/2011-बीओ-I]
संि कुमार जमश्र, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 5th August, 2024
S.O. 1683.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (3) of section 9 of the Banking
Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, read with sub-paragraph (1) of paragraph 3 of the
Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central Government hereby
nominates the persons specified in column (3) of the table below as Director on the Board of the Banks specified in
column (1) thereof, in place of the persons specified in column (2) of the said table, with immediate effect and until
further orders:-
S. No.
(1)
(2)
(3)
1
Canara Bank
Shri R. Kesavan
Shri Rohit Das
(DOB: 28.09.1970)
2
UCO Bank
Shri Rajesh Kumar
Dr. S. P. Mohanty
(DOB: 01.07.1972)
[F. No. 6/3/2011-BO-I]
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 5 अगस्ट् त, 2024
का.आ. 1684.—बैंककारी कंृनी (उृक्रमों का अिजन और अंतरण) अजिजन म, 1970 की िारा 9 की उृ-िारा
(3) के ंड ( ) द्वारा प्रित् त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, केन्द्री सरकार, एतिद्वारा, श्री भूषण कुमार जसन्िा के स्ट् ान ृर
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 7, 2024/भाद्र 16, 1946
3781
श्री मनोि मुट्टजत्तल अय् प्ृन (सं ुि सजचव, भारत सरकार, जवत्त मंत्राल , जवत्ती सेवाएं जवभाग) को तत्काल प्रभाव से
और अगले आिेिों तक, बैंक आफ इंजड ा के बोडज में जनिेिक के ृि ृर नाजमत करती िज।
[ई फा. सं. 6/2/(i)/2022-बीओ-I]
संि कुमार जमश्र, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 5th August, 2024
S.O. 1684.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b) of sub-section (3) of section 9 of the Banking
Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, the Central Government hereby nominates Shri
Manoj Muttathil Ayyappan (Joint Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Financial
Services) as Director on the Board of Bank of India, with immediate effect and until further orders, vice Shri Bhushan
Kumar Sinha.
[eF. No. 6/2/(i)/2022-BO-I]
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 5 अगस्ट् त, 2024
का.आ. 1685.—बैंककारी कंृनी (उृक्रमों का अिजन और अंतरण) अजिजन म, 1970 की िारा 9 की उृ-िारा
(3) के ंड ( ) द्वारा प्रित् त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, केन्द्री सरकार, एतिद्वारा, श्री कार्तजके जमश्र के स्ट् ान ृर
सुश्री नीलम अग्रवाल (जनिेिक, भारत सरकार, जवत्त मंत्राल , जवत्ती सेवाएं जवभाग) को तत्काल प्रभाव से और अगले
आिेिों तक, इजण्ड न ओवरसीि बैंक के बोडज में जनिेिक के ृि ृर नाजमत करती िज।
[ई फा. सं. 6/2/(ii)/2022-बीओ-I]
संि कुमार जमश्र, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 5th August, 2024
S.O. 1685.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b) of sub-section (3) of section 9 of the Banking
Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, the Central Government hereby nominates
Ms Neelam Agrawal (Director, Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Financial Services) as
Director on the Board of Indian Overseas Bank, with immediate effect and until further orders, vice
Shri Kartikeya Misra.
[eF. No. 6/2/(ii)/2022-BO-I]
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 7 अगस्ट् त, 2024
का.आ. 1686.—भारती स्ट्टेट बैंक अजिजन म, 1955 (1955 का 23) की िारा 20 की उृ-िारा (1) के सा
ृठ त िारा 19 के ण्ड ( ) द्वारा प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, केन्द्री सरकार, एतद्द्वारा, भारती स्ट् टेट बैंक के उृ
प्रबंि जनिेिक श्री राणा आिुतोष कुमार ससंि (िन् म जतज : 12.6.1967) को का जभार ग्रिण करने की तारी से और
उनकी अजिवर्षजता की आ ु प्राप्त करने की तारी (अ ाजत 30.6.2027) तक अ वा अगले आिेिों तक, िो भी ृिले िो,
भारती स्ट्टेट बैंक (एसबीआई) में प्रबंि जनिेिक के ृि ृर जन ुि करती िज।
[ई फा. सं. 2/1/2024-बीओ-I]
संि कुमार जमश्र, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 7th August, 2024
S.O. 1686.—In exercise of powers conferred by clause (b) of section 19 read with sub-section (1) of section
20 of the State Bank of India Act, 1955 (23 of 1955), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Rana Ashutosh
3782
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :SEPTEMBER 7, 2024/BHADRA 16, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Kumar Singh (DoB: 12.06.1967), Deputy Managing Director, State Bank of India (SBI) as Managing Director in SBI
with effect from the date of assumption of office and up to the date of his attaining the age of superannuation
(i.e. 30.06.2027), or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[eF. No. 2/1/2024-BO-I]
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 7 अगस्ट् त, 2024
का.आ. 1687.—भारती स्ट्टेट बैंक अजिजन म, 1955 (1955 का 23) की िारा 20 की उृ-िारा (1) के सा
ृठ त िारा 19 के ण्ड (क) द्वारा प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, केन्द्री सरकार, एतद्द्वारा, भारती स्ट् टेट बैंक के
प्रबंि जनिेिक श्री चल्ला श्रीजनवासुलु िेट्टी (िन् म जतज : 26.9.1965) को दिनांक 28.8.2024 को ा उसके बाि का जभार
ग्रिण करने की तारी से तीन वषज की अवजि के जलए अ वा अगले आिेिों तक, िो भी ृिले िो, भारती स्ट्टेट बैंक
(एसबीआई) में अध् क्ष के ृि ृर जन ुि करती िज।
[ई फा. सं. 2/1/2024-बीओ-I]
संि कुमार जमश्र, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 7th August, 2024
S.O. 1687.—In exercise of powers conferred by clause (a) of section 19 read with sub-section (1) of section
20 of the State Bank of India Act, 1955 (23 of 1955), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Challa
Sreenivasulu Setty (DoB: 26.09.1965), Managing Director, State Bank of India (SBI) as Chairman, SBI for a period
of three years with effect from the date of assumption of charge of the office, on or after 28.08.2024, or until further
orders, whichever is earlier.
[eF. No. 2/1/2024-BO-I]
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 9 अगस्ट् त, 2024
का.आ. 1688.—बैंककारी कंृनी (उृक्रमों का अिजन और अंतरण) अजिजन म, 1970 की िारा 9 की उृ-िारा
(3) के ंड (क) के ृरन्तुक द्वारा प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, केन्द्री सरकार, एतद्द्वारा, ूजन न बैंक आफ इंजड ा
की मु् मिाप्रबंिक सुश्री बीना विीि (िन्म जतज िः 17.5.1969) को का जभार ग्रिण करने की तारी से तीन वषज की
अवजि के जलए अ वा अगले आिेिों तक, िो भी ृिले िो, 1,76,800-2,24,000 रुृए (लेवल 14ए) के वेतनमान में बैंक
आफ बड़़ौिा में का जृालक जनिेिक के ृि ृर जन ुि करती िज।
[ई फा. सं. 4/5/(i)/2023-बीओ-I]
संि कुमार जमश्र, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 9th August, 2024
S.O. 1688.—In exercise of powers conferred by the proviso to clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 9 of
the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, Central Government hereby appoints
Ms. Beena Vaheed (DoB: 17.05.1969), Chief General Manager, Union Bank of India as Executive Director, Bank of
Baroda in the scale of pay Rs. 1,76,800 – 2,24,000 (Level 14A) for a period of three years with effect from the date of
assumption of charge of office, or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[eF. No. 4/5/(i)/2023-BO-I]
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 9 अगस्ट् त, 2024
का.आ. 1689.—बैंककारी कंृनी (उृक्रमों का अिजन और अंतरण) अजिजन म, 1980 की िारा 9 की
उृ-िारा (3) के ंड (क) के ृरन्तुक द्वारा प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, केन्द्री सरकार, एतद्द्वारा, ृंिाब नजिनल
बैंक के मु् मिाप्रबंिक श्री रािीवा (िन्म जतज िः 30.6.1968) को का जभार ग्रिण करने की तारी से तीन वषज की
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 7, 2024/भाद्र 16, 1946
3783
अवजि के जलए अ वा अगले आिेिों तक, िो भी ृिले िो, 1,76,800-2,24,000 रुृए (लेवल 14ए) के वेतनमान में
ृंिाब एंड ससंि बैंक में का जृालक जनिेिक के ृि ृर जन ुि करती िज।
[ई फा. सं. 4/5/(ii)/2023-बीओ-I]
संि कुमार जमश्र, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 9th August, 2024
S.O. 1689.—In exercise of powers conferred by the proviso to clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 9 of
the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980, Central Government hereby appoints
Shri Rajeeva (DoB: 30.06.1968), Chief General Manager, Punjab National Bank as Executive Director, Punjab &
Sind Bank in the scale of pay Rs. 1,76,800 – 2,24,000 (Level 14A) for a period of three years with effect from the
date of assumption of charge of office, or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[eF. No. 4/5/(ii)/2023-BO-I]
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 19 अगस्ट् त, 2024
का.आ. 1690.—बैंककारी कंृनी (उृक्रमों का अिजन और अंतरण) अजिजन म, 1970 की िारा 9 की उृ-िारा
(3) के ंड (क) द्वारा प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, केन्द्री सरकार, एतद्द्वारा, इजण्ड न ओवरसीि बैंक के का जृालक
जनिेिक श्री िॉ िीृ ित्ता रॉ (िन्म जतज िः 1.7.1972) के का जकाल को दिनांक 20.10.2024 से आगे एक वषज की
अवजि के जलए अ वा अगले आिेिों तक, िो भी ृिले िो, बढाती िज।
[ई फा. सं. 4/2/(i)/2024-बीओ-I]
संि कुमार जमश्र, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 19th August, 2024
S.O. 1690.—In exercise of powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 9 of the Banking
Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, the Central Government hereby extends the term
of office of Shri Joydeep Dutta Roy (DoB: 01.07.1972), Executive Director, Indian Overseas Bank for a period of one
year beyond 20.10.2024, or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[eF. No. 4/2/(i)/2024-BO-I]
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 19 अगस्ट् त, 2024
का.आ. 1691.—बैंककारी कंृनी (उृक्रमों का अिजन और अंतरण) अजिजन म, 1970 की िारा 9 की उृ-िारा
(3) के ंड (क) द्वारा प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, केन्द्री सरकार, एतद्द्वारा, बैंक आफ मिाराष्ट्र के का जृालक
जनिेिक श्री आिीष ृाण्डे (िन्म जतज िः 24.6.1971) के का जकाल को दिनांक 30.12.2024 से आगे िो वषज की अवजि
के जलए अ वा अगले आिेिों तक, िो भी ृिले िो, बढाती िज।
[ई फा. सं. 4/2/(ii)/2024-बीओ-I]
संि कुमार जमश्र, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 19th August, 2024
S.O. 1691.—In exercise of powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 9 of the Banking
Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, the Central Government hereby extends the term
of office of Shri Asheesh Pandey (DoB: 24.06.1971), Executive Director, Bank of Maharashtra for a period of two
years beyond 30.12.2024, or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[eF. No. 4/2/(ii)/2024-BO-I]
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA, Under Secy.
3784
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :SEPTEMBER 7, 2024/BHADRA 16, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
नई दिल्ली, 19 अगस्ट् त, 2024
का.आ. 1692.—बैंककारी कंृनी (उृक्रमों का अिजन और अंतरण) अजिजन म, 1970 की िारा 9 की उृ-िारा
(3) के ंड (क) द्वारा प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, केन्द्री सरकार, एतद्द्वारा, ृंिाब नजिनल बैंक के का जृालक
जनिेिक श्री कल् ाण कुमार (िन्म जतज िः 10.1.1969) के का जकाल को दिनांक 20.10.2024 से आगे िो वषज की अवजि के
जलए अ वा अगले आिेिों तक, िो भी ृिले िो, बढाती िज।
[ई फा. सं. 4/2/(iii)/2024-बीओ-I]
संि कुमार जमश्र, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 19th August, 2024
S.O. 1692.—In exercise of powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 9 of the Banking
Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, the Central Government hereby extends the term
of office of Shri Kalyan Kumar (DoB: 10.01.1969), Executive Director, Punjab National Bank for a period of two
years beyond 20.10.2024, or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[eF. No. 4/2/(iii)/2024-BO-I]
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA, Under Secy.
सिकाठरता मंत्राल
नई दिल्ली, 27 अगस्ट् त, 2024
का.आ. 1693.—बहु-राज् ी सिकारी सजमजत अजिजन म, 2002 (2002 का 39) के ंड 4 के उृ ंड (1) द्वारा
प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए एवं भारत सरकार की अजिसूचना सं. एल-11012/2/2003-एल एवं एम दिनांक
11 माचज, 2024 के अजिक्रमण में, केन्द्र सरकार एततद्वारा, श्री रबीन्द्र कुमार अग्रवाल, भारती प्रिासजनक सेवा (केरला-
1997), अृर सजचव (सिकाठरता) को सिकाठरता मंत्राल , भारत सरकार में तत्काल प्रभाव से एवं अगले आिेिों तक
सिकारी सजमजत ों के केन्द्री ृंिी क के प ृ में जन ुि करती िज।
[फा. सं. एल-11012/2/2003-एल एवं एम)]
अवनीि रस्ट्तोगी, अवर सजचव
MINISTRY OF COOPERATION
New Delhi, the 27th August, 2024
S.O. 1693.—In exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Multi-State
Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 (39 of 2002) and in supersession of the Government of India Notification
No. L-11012/2/2003-L&M dated 11.03.2024, the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Rabindra Kumar
Agarwal, IAS, (KL-1997), Additional Secretary (Cooperation) in the Ministry of Cooperation, Government of India
as the Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies with immediate effect and until further orders.
[F. No. L-11012/2/2003-L&M)]
AVNISH RASTOGI, Under Secy.
संस्ट् कषजत मंत्राल
नई दिल्ली, 30 अगस्ट् त, 2024
का.आ. 1694.—केंद्र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकी प्र ोिनों के जलए प्र ोग) जन म, 1976 के जन म 10
के उृ जन म (4) के अनुसरण में संस्ट् कषजत मंत्राल के अंतगजत आने वाले का ाजल , रा् री अजभले ागार, अजभले केन द्र,
10-ए, झालाना सांस्ट् ाजनक क्षेत्र, झालाना डूंगरी, ि ृुर जिनमें 80 प्रजतित से अजिक अजिकाठर ों/कमजचाठर ों ने सिंिी
का का जसािक ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जल ा िज, को अजिसूजचत करती िज।
ि अजिसूचना रािृत्र में प्रकािन की तारी से प्रवषत् त िोगी।
[फा. सं. ई.13016/1/2024- सिंिी]
गुरमीत ससंि चावला, सं ुक् त सजचव
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 7, 2024/भाद्र 16, 1946
3785
MINISTRY OF CULTURE
New Delhi, the 30th August, 2024
S.O. 1694.—In pursuance of Sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for official purposes of
the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the office National Archives, Records Centre, 10-A,
Jhalana Institutional Area, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur under Ministry of Culture wherein more than 80% officers/staff
have acquired working knowledge of Hindi.
This notification shall come into force from the date of publication in the Official Gazette.
[F. No. E.13016/1/2024-Hindi]
GURMEET SINGH CHAWLA, Jt. Secy.
ृेरोजल म और प्राकषजतक गजस मंत्राल
नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्ट् त, 2024
का.आ. 1695.—केन्द्री सरकार ने ृेरोजल म और जनि ृाइृलाइन (भूजम में उृ ोग के अजिकार का अिजन)
अजिजन म,1962(1962 का 50) की िारा 6 की उृिारा (1) के अिीन िारी की गई भारत सरकार के ृेरोजल म और
प्राकषजतक गजस मंत्राल की नीचे िी गई अनुसूची में ा उजल्लज त तारी ों एवम का. आ. द्वारा उन अजिसूचनाओं से संलग्न
अनुसूची में जवजनर्िजष्ट भूजम में उृ ोग के अजिकार का अिजन दक ा ा|
और केन्द्री सरकार ने, उि अजिजन म की िारा 6 की उृिारा (4) द्वारा प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, उि
भूजम ों में, सभी जवल्लंगमों से मुि, उृ ोग का अजिकार आई एचबी जलजमटेड में जनजित दक ा ा|
और सक्षम प्राजिकारी ने केन्द्री सरकार को ठरृोटज िी िज दक ृेरोजल म उत्ृाि के ृठरविन के जलए मध् -प्रिेि
राज् में आई एच बी जलजमटेड की कांडला गोर ृुर एल.ृी.िी. ृाइृलाइन जबछाई िा चुकी िैं, अतिः उस भूजम के बारे में,
जिसका संजक्षप्त जववरण इस अजिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में जवजनर्िजष्ट दक ा ग ा िैं, ऐसे प्रचालन को मध् -प्रिेि राज् में
समाप्त दक ा िाए|
अतिः अब, केन्द्री सरकार, ृेरोजल म और जनि ृाइृलाइन(भूजम में उृ ोग के अजिकार का अिजन)1963 के
जन म 4 के स्ट्ृष्टीकरण – 1 के अिीन उस तारी को जिस ृर ि अजिसूचना भारत के रािृत्र में प्रकाजित िोती िैं, मध् -
प्रिेि राज् के झाबुआ एवं िार जिले के नीचे वर्णजत गााँवो में मागाजिकार गजतजवजि ों की समाप्ती की तारी के प ृ में
घोजषत करती िैं |
अनुसूची
जिला: झाबुआ राज् : मध् प्रिेि
क्रमांक
का. आ. सं. एवं दिनांक
ग्राम का नाम
तिसील
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1.
का.आ. 2535 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
का.आ. 4822(अ) दिनांक10.10.2022
काला ुंट
झाबुआ
2.
का.आ. 2535 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
ाटाृानी
झाबुआ
3.
का.आ. 2535 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
बावड़ीबड़ी
झाबुआ
4.
का.आ. 2535 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
काकरािरा ुिज
झाबुआ
5.
का.आ. 2535 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
मोि
झाबुआ
6.
का.आ. 2535 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
गेलरछोटी
झाबुआ
7.
का.आ. 2535 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
बलवन
झाबुआ
8.
का.आ. 2535 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
का.आ. 4822(अ) दिनांक10.10.2022
काचला
झाबुआ
3786
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :SEPTEMBER 7, 2024/BHADRA 16, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
9.
का.आ. 2535 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
का.आ. 2281(अ) दिनांक08.05.2023
झा डा
झाबुआ
10.
का.आ. 2535 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
अन्तरवेजल ा
झाबुआ
11.
का.आ. 2535 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
कल्लीृुरा
झाबुआ
12.
का.आ. 2535 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
ुटावा
झाबुआ
13.
का.आ. 2535 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
ा र ेडी
झाबुआ
14.
का.आ. 2535 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
मानृुरा
झाबुआ
15.
का.आ. 2535 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
भगोर
झाबुआ
16.
का.आ. 2535 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
एिनृुरा
झाबुआ
17.
का.आ. 2535 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
गोृालृुरा
झाबुआ
18.
का.आ. 2535 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
नवाृाडा नवीन
झाबुआ
19.
का.आ. 2535 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
आमलीृ ार
झाबुआ
20.
का.आ. 2535 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
बडलीृाडा
झाबुआ
21.
का.आ. 2535 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
लोिाठर ा
झाबुआ
22.
का.आ. 2531(अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
मो ड़ा
मेघनगर
23.
का.आ. 2531(अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
का.आ. 4822(अ) दिनांक10.10.2022
िेिला
मेघनगर
24.
का.आ. 2533 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
बेडिा
ृेटलावि
25.
का.आ. 2533 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
झावजल ा
ृेटलावि
26.
का.आ. 2533 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
रल् ावन
ृेटलावि
27.
का.आ. 2533 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
सो ेला
ृेटलावि
28.
का.आ. 2533 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
अलस्ट् ा ेजड
ृेटलावि
29.
का.आ. 2533 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
घोडा ल
ृेटलावि
30.
का.आ. 2533 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
मा ुरी ा
ृेटलावि
31.
का.आ. 2533 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
का.आ. 2281(अ) दिनांक08.05.2023
बनी
ृेटलावि
32.
का.आ. 2533 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
सामली
ृेटलावि
33.
का.आ. 2533 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
का.आ. 2281(अ) दिनांक08.05.2023
कचरा िान
ृेटलावि
34.
का.आ. 2533 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
गुलरीृाडा
ृेटलावि
35.
का.आ. 2533 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
सलुजन ा बडा
ृेटलावि
36.
का.आ. 2533 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
नािरगढ
ृेटलावि
37.
का.आ. 2533 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
का.आ. 4822(अ) दिनांक10.10.2022
बजकल्िा
ृेटलावि
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 7, 2024/भाद्र 16, 1946
3787
38.
का.आ. 2533 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
बडलीृाडा
ृेटलावि
39.
का.आ. 2533 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
का ारेल
ृेटलावि
40.
का.आ. 2533 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
भूठरघाटी
ृेटलावि
41.
का.आ. 2533 (अ) दिनांक 18.06.2021
भील कोटडा
ृेटलावि
जिला: िार राज् : मध् प्रिेि
1.
का.आ. 0824 (अ) दिनांक22.02.2022
का.आ. 2279(अ) दिनांक08.05.2023
ो ठर ाघाट
सरिारृुर
2.
का.आ. 0825(अ) दिनांक22.02.2022
का.आ. 4251(अ) दिनांक12.09.2022
का.आ. 4819(अ) दिनांक10.10.2022
का.आ. 2279(अ) दिनांक08.05.2023
सलवा
सरिारृुर
3.
का.आ. 0825(अ) दिनांक22.02.2022
का.आ. 2279(अ) दिनांक08.05.2023
लाबठर ा
सरिारृुर
4.
का.आ. 0825 (अ) दिनांक 22.02.2022
का.आ. 4819(अ) दिनांक10.10.2022
बरमण्डल
सरिारृुर
5.
का.आ. 2963(अ) दिनांक 22.07.2021
बर ेडा
सरिारृुर
6.
का.आ. 2963(अ) दिनांक 22.07.2021
ुटृला
सरिारृुर
7.
का.आ. 2963(अ) दिनांक 22.07.2021
चन्ि़ौजड ा
सरिारृुर
8.
का.आ. 2963(अ) दिनांक 22.07.2021
बणी
सरिारृुर
9.
का.आ. 4193 (अ) दिनांक 7.10.2021
दकसनृुरा
बिनावर
10.
का.आ. 4193 (अ)दिनांक 07.10.2021
मानृुर
बिनावर
11.
का.आ. 4193 (अ)दिनांक 07.10.2021
का.आ. 1438(अ) दिनांक22.03.2022
इंद्रावल
बिनावर
12.
का.आ. 4193 (अ)दिनांक 07.10.2021
का.आ. 4819(अ) दिनांक 10.10.2022
का.आ. 2279(अ) दिनांक 08.05.2023
काडोिकला
बिनावर
13.
का.आ. 4193 (अ)दिनांक 07.10.2021
सीलोिा ुिज
बिनावर
14.
का.आ. 4193 (अ)दिनांक 07.10.2021
गोृाल ेड़ी
बिनावर
15.
का.आ. 4193 (अ)दिनांक 07.10.2021
छा न ुिज
बिनावर
16.
का.आ. 4193 (अ)दिनांक 07.10.2021
ृंचमु ी
बिनावर
17.
का.आ. 2965 (अ)दिनांक 22.07.2021
काराजड ा
िार
18.
का.आ. 2965 (अ)दिनांक 22.07.2021
बेरछा
िार
19.
का.आ. 2965 (अ)दिनांक 22.07.2021
छाृर
िार
20.
का.आ. 2965 (अ)दिनांक 22.07.2021
सृंिरा ा
िार
3788
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :SEPTEMBER 7, 2024/BHADRA 16, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
का.आ.4819(अ) दिनांक10.10.2022
21.
का.आ. 2965 (अ)दिनांक 22.07.2021
जबलोिा
िार
22.
का.आ. 2965 (अ)दिनांक 22.07.2021
का.आ.4819(अ) दिनांक10.10.2022
तीसगांव
िार
23.
का.आ. 2965 (अ)दिनांक 22.07.2021
का.आ.4819(अ) दिनांक10.10.2022
जभडोता ुिज
िार
24.
का.आ. 2965 (अ)दिनांक 22.07.2021
रामृुर
िार
25.
का.आ. 2965 (अ)दिनांक 22.07.2021
बालोिा बुिुगज
िार
26.
का.आ. 2965 (अ)दिनांक 22.07.2021
गवला
िार
27.
का.आ. 2965 (अ)दिनांक 22.07.2021
अकोल् ा
िार
28.
का.आ. 2965 (अ)दिनांक 22.07.2021
का.आ.4819(अ) दिनांक10.10.2022
गोजवन्िृुरा
िार
29.
का.आ. 2965 (अ)दिनांक 22.07.2021
माचकिा
िार
30.
का.आ. 2965 (अ)दिनांक 22.07.2021
बग्गड
िार
31.
का.आ. 2965 (अ)दिनांक 22.07.2021
एकलिुनािार
िार
32.
का.आ. 2965 (अ)दिनांक 22.07.2021
सु ंडा
िार
33.
का.आ. 2965 (अ)दिनांक 22.07.2021
नेकृुर
िार
34.
का.आ. 2965 (अ)दिनांक 22.07.2021
बडछाृरा
िार
35.
का.आ. 2965 (अ)दिनांक 22.07.2021
ग् ासाबाि
िार
[फा. सं. आर-11025(15)/5/2020-ओआर-I/ृाटज(2)/ई-45913]
िजि िे र ससंि, अवर सजचव
MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
New Delhi, the 28th August, 2024
S.O. 1695.—Whereas, by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and
Natural Gas, S. O. Numbers and Dates as mentioned in the Schedule below issued under Sub-section (i) of section 6
of Petroleum and Minerals Pipeline (Acquisition of right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central
Government acquired the Right of User in the lands specified in the schedule appended to those notifications.
AND WHEREAS, in exercise of the powers conferred by the Sub-Section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act,
the Central Government vested the Right of user in the lands free from all encumbrances in the IHB Limited.
AND WHEREAS, the Competent Authority has made a report to the Central Government that the pipeline
has been laid for the purpose of transportation of LPG in the said lands and hence such operation may be terminated
for KandlaGorakhpur LPG Pipeline Project in the state of Madhya Pradesh in respect of the said lands which in brief
are specified in the Schedule annexed to the Notification;
“Now, therefore, as required under explanation–1 of rule 4 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines
(Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Rules 1963, the Central Government hereby declare the dates on which this
notification is Right Published in the Gazette of India as the date of “Termination of Operation” in ROU Village
mentioned in Jhabua and Dhar district in the state of Madhya Pradesh.
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 7, 2024/भाद्र 16, 1946
3789
SCHEDULE
District: Jhabua State: Madhya Pradesh
Sl.No.
S.O. No. & Date
Name of Village
Name of Tehsil
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1.
S.O. No. 2535 (E) dated 18.06.2021
S.O. No. 4822(E) dated10.10.2022
Kalakhunt
Jhabua
2.
S.O. No. 2535 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Khatapani
Jhabua
3.
S.O. No. 2535 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Bawadibadi
Jhabua
4.
S.O. No. 2535 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Kakradarakhurd
Jhabua
5.
S.O. No. 2535 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Mod
Jhabua
6.
S.O. No. 2535 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Gelarchhoti
Jhabua
7.
S.O. No. 2535 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Balwan
Jhabua
8.
S.O. No. 2535 (E) dated 18.06.2021
S.O. No. 4822(E) dated10.10.2022
Kachala
Jhabua
9.
S.O. No. 2535 (E) dated 18.06.2021
S.O. No. 2281(E) dated08.05.2023
Jhayda
Jhabua
10.
S.O. No. 2535 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Antarveliya
Jhabua
11.
S.O. No. 2535 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Kallipura
Jhabua
12.
S.O. No. 2535 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Khutawa
Jhabua
13.
S.O. No. 2535 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Khakharkhedi
Jhabua
14.
S.O. No. 2535 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Manpura
Jhabua
15.
S.O. No. 2535 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Bhagor
Jhabua
16.
S.O. No. 2535 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Aejanpura
Jhabua
17.
S.O. No. 2535 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Gopalpura
Jhabua
18.
S.O. No. 2535 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Nawapada
Jhabua
19.
S.O. No. 2535 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Amlipathar
Jhabua
20.
S.O. No. 2535 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Badlipada
Jhabua
21.
S.O. No. 2535 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Lohariya
Jhabua
22.
S.O. No. 2531(E) dated 18.06.2021
Mokhada
Meghnagar
23.
S.O. No. 2531(E) dated 18.06.2021
S.O. No. 4822(E) dated10.10.2022
Dedla
Meghnagar
24.
S.O. No. 2533 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Bedada
Petlawad
25.
S.O. No. 2533 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Jhawalia
Petlawad
26.
S.O. No. 2533 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Ralyawan
Petlawad
27.
S.O. No. 2533 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Soila
Petlawad
28.
S.O. No. 2533 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Alasyakhedi
Petlawad
29.
S.O. No. 2533 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Ghodathal
Petlawad
30.
S.O. No. 2533 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Mathuria
Petlawad
31.
S.O. No. 2533 (E) dated 18.06.2021
S.O. No. 2281(E) dated08.05.2023
Bani
Petlawad
32.
S.O. No. 2533 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Samli
Petlawad
33.
S.O. No. 2533 (E) dated 18.06.2021
S.O. No. 2281(E) dated08.05.2023
Kachrakhadan
Petlawad
34.
S.O. No. 2533 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Gularipada
Petlawad
35.
S.O. No. 2533 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Saluniyabada
Petlawad
36.
S.O. No. 2533 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Nahargarh
Petlawad
37.
S.O. No. 2533 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Bekalda
Petlawad
3790
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :SEPTEMBER 7, 2024/BHADRA 16, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
S.O. No. 4822(E) dated10.10.2022
38.
S.O. No. 2533 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Baldipada
Petlawad
39.
S.O. No. 2533 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Kayarel
Petlawad
40.
S.O. No. 2533 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Bhurighati
Petlawad
41.
S.O. No. 2533 (E) dated 18.06.2021
Bheelkotda
Petlawad
District: Dhar State: Madhya Pradesh
1.
S.O. No. 0824(E) dated22.02.2022
S.O. No. 2279(E) dated08.05.2023
Khakhariyaghat
Sardarpur
2.
S.O. No. 0825(E) dated22.02.2022
S.O. No. 4251(E) dated12.09.2022
S.O. No. 4819(E) dated10.10.2022
S.O. No. 2279(E) dated08.05.2023
Salwa
Sardarpur
3.
S.O. No. 0825(E) dated22.02.2022
S.O. No. 2279(E) dated08.05.2023
Labariya
Sardarpur
4.
S.O. No. 0825 (E) dated 22.02.2022
S.O. No. 4819(E) dated10.10.2022
Barmandal
Sardarpur
5.
S.O. No. 2963(E) dated 22.07.2021
Barkheda
Sardarpur
6.
S.O. No. 2963(E) dated 22.07.2021
Khuntpala
Sardarpur
7.
S.O. No. 2963(E) dated 22.07.2021
Chandodiya
Sardarpur
8.
S.O. No. 2963(E) dated 22.07.2021
Bani
Sardarpur
9.
S.O. No. 4193 (E) dated 07.10.2021
Kisanpura
Badnawar
10.
S.O. No. 4193 (E) dated 07.10.2021
Manpura
Badnawar
11.
S.O. No. 4193 (E) dated 07.10.2021
S.O. No. 1438(E) dated22.03.2022
Indrawal
Badnawar
12.
S.O. No. 4193 (E) dated 07.10.2021
S.O. No. 4819(E) dated10.10.2022
S.O. No. 2279(E) dated08.05.2023
Kadodkalan
Badnawar
13.
S.O. No. 4193 (E) dated 07.10.2021
Silodakhurd
Badnawar
14.
S.O. No. 4193 (E) dated 07.10.2021
Gopal khedi
Badnawar
15.
S.O. No. 4193 (E) dated 07.10.2021
Chhayankhurd
Badnawar
16.
S.O. No. 4193 (E) dated 07.10.2021
Panchmukhi
Badnawar
17.
S.O. No. 2965 (E) dated 22.07.2021
Karadiya
Dhar
18.
S.O. No. 2965 (E) dated 22.07.2021
Berchha
Dhar
19.
S.O. No. 2965 (E) dated 22.07.2021
Chhapar
Dhar
20.
S.O. No. 2965 (E) dated 22.07.2021
S.O. No. 4819(E) dated10.10.2022
Pinjraya
Dhar
21.
S.O. No. 2965 (E) dated 22.07.2021
Biloda
Dhar
22.
S.O. No. 2965 (E) dated 22.07.2021
S.O. No. 4819(E) dated10.10.2022
Tisgaon
Dhar
23.
S.O. No. 2965 (E) dated 22.07.2021
S.O. No. 4819(E) dated10.10.2022
Bhidotakhurd
Dhar
24.
S.O. No. 2965 (E) dated 22.07.2021
Rampur
Dhar
25.
S.O. No. 2965 (E) dated 22.07.2021
Balodabuzurg
Dhar
26.
S.O. No. 2965 (E) dated 22.07.2021
Gawala
Dhar
27.
S.O. No. 2965 (E) dated 22.07.2021
Akoliya
Dhar
28.
S.O. No. 2965 (E) dated 22.07.2021
S.O. No. 4819(E) dated10.10.2022
Govindpura
Dhar
29.
S.O. No. 2965 (E) dated 22.07.2021
Machakda
Dhar
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 7, 2024/भाद्र 16, 1946
3791
30.
S.O. No. 2965 (E) dated 22.07.2021
Baggad
Dhar
31.
S.O. No. 2965 (E) dated 22.07.2021
Akaldunadhar
Dhar
32.
S.O. No. 2965 (E) dated 22.07.2021
Sukheda
Dhar
33.
S.O. No. 2965 (E) dated 22.07.2021
Nekpur
Dhar
34.
S.O. No. 2965 (E) dated 22.07.2021
Badchhapra
Dhar
35.
S.O. No. 2965 (E) dated 22.07.2021
Gyasabad
Dhar
[F. No. R- 11025(15)/5/2020-OR-I/Part(2)/E-45913]
SHASHI SHEKHAR SINGH, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 4 जसतम् बर, 2024
का.आ. 1696.—केन्द्री सरकार ने ृेरोजल म और जनि ृाइृलाइन (भूजम मे उृ ोग के अजिकार का अिजन)
अजिजन म, 1962 (1962 का 50) की िारा 6 की उृिारा (1) अिीन िारी की गई भारत सरकार के ृेरोजल म और
प्राकषजतक गजस मंत्राल की नीचे िी गई अनुसूची मे ा उजल्लज त तारी ों की एवम का.आ. द्वारा उन अजिसूचनाओं से
संलग्न अनुसूची मे जवजनर्िजष्ट भूजम में उृ ोग के अजिकार का अिजन दक ा ा।
और केन्द्री सरकार ने, उि अजिजन म की िारा 6 की उृिारा (4) द्वारा प्रित्त िजि ों का प्र ोग करते हुए,
उि भूजम ो में, सभी जवल्लंगमों से मुि, उृ ोग का अजिकार जिन्िुस्ट्तान ृेरोजल म कॉृोरेिन जलजमटेड (एच.ृी.सी.एल)
में जनजित दक ा ा।
और सक्षम प्राजिकारी ने केन्द्री सरकार को ठरृोटज िी िज दक ृेरोजल म उत्ृाि के ृठरविन के जलए तेलंगाना
राज् में जिन्िुस्ट्तान ृेरोजल म कॉृोरेिन जलजमटेड (एच.ृी.सी.एल) की िासन (कनाजटका) से चेरलाृल्ली (तेलंगाना)
एलृीिी ृाइृलाइन जबछाई िा चुकी िज, अत: उस भूजम के बारे मे, जिसका संजक्षप्त जववरण इस अजिसूचना से संलग्न
अनुसूची से जवजनर्िजष्ट दक ा ग ा िज, ऐसे प्रचालन को तेलंगाना राज् मे समाप्त दक ा िाए।
अत: अब, केन्द्री सरकार, ृेरोजल म और जनि ृाइृलाइन (भूजम में उृ ोग के अजिकार का अिजन)
अजिजन म, 1963 के जन म 4 के स्ट्ृष्टीकरण -1 के अिीन उन तारी ों को जिन ृर ि अजिसूचना भारत के रािृत्र मे
प्रकाजित िोती िज, तेलंगाना राज् के िोगुलांबा गड़वाल, वनृर ी, मिबूबनगर, नागरकरनूल, रंगारेड्डी और मेडचल
मलकािीजगरी जिले के नीचे वर्णजत गााँवो मे मागाजिकार गजतजवजि ो की समाप्ती की तारी के प ृ मे घोजषत करती िज ।
अनुसूची
जिला: िोगुलांबा गड़वाल राज् : तेलंगाना
क्रमांक
का. आ. सं. एवं दिनांक
गााँव का नाम
मंडल का नाम
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
1720 (अ) दिनांक 01.06.2020
कोरवीृाडु
मनोृाड़
2
723 (अ) दिनांक 17.02.2021
गोकुलृाड़
3
3877 (अ) दिनांक 16.09.2021
मनोृाड़
4
1391 (अ) दिनांक 22.03.2022
िल्लाृुर
5
5270 (अ) दिनांक 03.11.2022
बोरवल्ली
6
829 (अ) दिनांक 08.05.2023
ृल्लेृाडु
7
मंगमृेट
जिला: वनृर ी राज् : तेलंगाना
क्रमांक
का. आ. सं. एवं दिनांक
गााँव का नाम
मंडल का नाम
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
1716 (अ) दिनांक 01.06.2020
बुरिीृाडु
ृेब्बेर
3792
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :SEPTEMBER 7, 2024/BHADRA 16, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2
3299 (अ) दिनांक 10.08.2021
िुकुर
3
3784 (अ) दिनांक 08.09.2021
रामेश्वरृुर
4
3878 (अ) दिनांक 16.09.2021
ृा ृल्ली
5
1390 (अ) दिनांक 22.03.2022
चेलीजमल्ला
6
5271 (अ) दिनांक 03.11.2022
कांचीरावृल्ली
7
827 (अ) दिनांक 08.05.2023
8
1719 (अ) दिनांक 01.06.2020
वेंकटाृुर
श्रीरंगाृुर
9
3532 (अ) दिनांक 07.10.2020
श्रीरंगाृुर
10
3297 (अ) दिनांक 10.08.2021
कंबालाृुर
11
3796 (अ) दिनांक 08.09.2021
ाटीृामुला
12
3879 (अ) दिनांक 16.09.2021
13
1380 (अ) दिनांक 22.03.2022
14
4913 (अ) दिनांक 14.10.2022
15
3492 (अ) दिनांक 05.10.2020
सवाईगुडम
वनृर ी
16
3867 (अ) दिनांक 16.09.2021
नाचिल्ली
17
1392 (अ) दिनांक 22.03.2022
दकस्ट्टाजगरी
18
4914 (अ) दिनांक 14.10.2022
ृेद्दागुडेम
19
830 (अ) दिनांक 08.05.2023
रािाृेट
20
3493 (अ) दिनांक 05.10.2020
रािानगर
21
1396 (अ) दिनांक 22.03.2022
अचुताृुर
22
4915 (अ) दिनांक 14.10.2022
जचत् ाला
23
831 (अ) दिनांक 08.05.2023
ृेद्दामंिाड़ी
ृेद्दामंिाड़ी
24
1718 (अ) दिनांक 01.06.2020
जचन्नामंिाडी
25
3534 (अ) दिनांक 07.10.2020
ृामीरेड्डीृल्ली
26
3300 (अ) दिनांक 10.08.2021
जवराईृल्ली
27
3798 (अ) दिनांक 08.09.2021
सोलीृुर
घनृुर
28
3875 (अ) दिनांक 16.09.2021
मनािीृेट
29
1379 (अ) दिनांक 22.03.2022
मल्काृुर
30
5272 (अ) दिनांक 03.11.2022
घनृुर
31
826 (अ) दिनांक 08.05.2023
आगारम
32
कमलुिीनृुर
33
ीरमलाईृल्ली
जिला: मिबूबनगर राज् : तेलंगाना
क्रमांक
का. आ. सं. एवं दिनांक
गााँव का नाम
मंडल का नाम
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
2248 (अ) दिनांक 07.07.2020
कप्ृेटा
भूतृुर
2
3298 (अ) दिनांक 10.08.2021
ृात मोलगरा
3
3799 (अ) दिनांक 08.09.2021
कोत मोलगरा
4
3873 (अ) दिनांक 16.09.2021
भूतृुर
5
1393 (अ) दिनांक 22.03.2022
कोतुर
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 7, 2024/भाद्र 16, 1946
3793
6
5274 (अ) दिनांक 03.11.2022
ताजडृरती
7
825 (अ) दिनांक 08.05.2023
8
2508 (अ) दिनांक 29.07.2020
सचंतबोइनृल्ली
िड़चेरला
9
1378 (अ) दिनांक 22.03.2022
आलूर
10
3303 (अ) दिनांक 10.08.2021
बुरगुृल्ली
11
3797 (अ) दिनांक 08.09.2021
नागसाला
12
3876 (अ) दिनांक 16.09.2021
नसरुल्लाबाि
13
5273 (अ) दिनांक 03.11.2022
गंगाृुर
14
3533 (अ) दिनांक 07.10.2020
गोृुलाृुरम
15
3795 (अ) दिनांक 08.09.2021
कोडगल
16
3301 (अ) दिनांक 10.08.2021
ईडगाणृल्ली
रािाृुर
17
1382 (अ) दिनांक 22.03.2022
18
828 (अ) दिनांक 08.05.2023
19
2507 (अ) दिनांक 29.07.2020
जतरुमलजगरी
बालानगर
20
3872 (अ) दिनांक 16.09.2021
मोिंृल्ली
21
1387 (अ) दिनांक 22.03.2022
ृेद्दारेवल्ली
22
5276 (अ) दिनांक 03.11.2022
िेमािीृुर
23
सलंगारम
जिला: नागरकरनूल राज् : तेलंगाना
क्रमांक
का. आ. सं. एवं दिनांक
गााँव का नाम
मंडल का नाम
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
2252 (अ) दिनांक 07.07.2020
मठरकलकुरिु
ज मािीृेट
2
3880 (अ) दिनांक 16.09.2021
3
1381 (अ) दिनांक 22.03.2022
जिला: रंगारेड्डी राज् : तेलंगाना
क्रमांक
का. आ. सं. एवं दिनांक
गााँव का नाम
मंडल का नाम
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
3061 (अ) दिनांक 02.09.2020
इप्ृालृल्ली
केिमृेट
2
4288 (अ) दिनांक 26.11.2020
वेमुलानवज
3
5277(अ) दिनांक 03.11.2022
संगम
4
832 (अ) दिनांक 08.05.2023
एक्लास ानृेट
5
1721 (अ) दिनांक 01.06.2020
जसद्धाृुर
को ुर
6
4284 (अ) दिनांक 26.11.2020
भद्राईृल्ली
7
1386 (अ) दिनांक 22.03.2022
कोडीचेलाज
3794
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :SEPTEMBER 7, 2024/BHADRA 16, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
8
5279 (अ) दिनांक 03.11.2022
9
2462 (अ) दिनांक 27.07.2020
कोडालाृड़कल
मिेश्वरम
10
4287 (अ) दिनांक 26.11.2020
सुभानृुर
11
1384 (अ) दिनांक 22.03.2020
कल्वाकोले
12
5275 (अ) दिनांक 03.11.2022
अमीरृेट
13
2461 (अ) दिनांक 27.07.2020
तुृरा ुिज
14
1383 (अ) दिनांक 22.03.2022
नागीरेड्डीृल्ली
15
3302 (अ) दिनांक 10.08.2021
गोल्लूर
16
3785 (अ) दिनांक 08.09.2021
नंिीृल्ली
17
4916 (अ) दिनांक 14.10.2022
डोंड िंकराृुर
समसाबाि
18
4286 (अ) दिनांक 26.11.2020
संगीगुड़ा
19
3871 (अ) दिनांक 16.09.2021
गोलकुंडा ुिज
20
5278 (अ) दिनांक 03.11.2022
बचाराम
अब्िुल्लाृुरमेट
जिला: मेडचल मलकािीजगरी राज् : तेलंगाना
क्रमांक
का. आ. सं. एवं दिनांक
गााँव का नाम
मंडल का नाम
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
1717 (अ) दिनांक 01.06.2020
मनमृेट
घटकेसर
2
4285 (अ) दिनांक 26.11.2020
इस्ट्माइल ानगुड़ा
3
3874 (अ) दिनांक 16.09.2021
कोरेमुल्ला
4
1385 (अ) दिनांक 22.03.2022
अन्नोजिगुड्डा
5
रामृल्ली
कीसरा
[फा. सं. आर-12031/2/2019-ओ.आर-आई/ई-31417]
एस. एस. ससंि, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 4th September, 2024
S.O. 1696.—Whereas, by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural
Gas, S.O. numbers and dates as mentioned in the Schedule below issued under Sub-section (i) of section 6, Petroleum
and Minerals Pipeline (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government
acquired the Right of User in the said lands specified in the Schedules appended to those notifications.
AND WHEREAS, in exercise of the powers conferred by the Sub-Section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act,
the Central Government vested the Right of User in the said lands free from all encumbrances in the Hindustan
Petroleum Corporation Limited;
AND WHEREAS, the Competent Authority has made a report to the Central Government that the pipeline
has been laid for the purpose of transportation of LPG, in the said lands and hence the operation may be terminated
from Hassan (Karnataka) to Cherlapalli (Telangana) Pipeline Project in the state of Telangana in respect of the said
lands which in brief are specified in the Schedule annexed to the Notification;
“Now, therefore, as required under explanation – 1 of rule 4 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines
(Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Rules 1963, the Central Government hereby declare the dates on which the
notification is published in the Gazette of India as the date of “Termination of Operation” in ROU Village mentioned
in Jogulamba Gadwal, Wanaparthy, Mahbubnagar, Nagarkurnool, Rangareddy and Medchal Malkajigiri
district in the state of Telangana.”
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 7, 2024/भाद्र 16, 1946
3795
SCHEDULE
District: Jogulamba Gadwal State: Telangana
Sl. No.
S.O. No. & Date
Name of the Village
Name of the Mandal
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
1720(E) Date 01.06.2020
Korvipadu
Manopad
2
723(E) Date 17.02.2021
Gokulapad
3
3877(E) Date 16.09.2021
Manopad
4
1391(E) Date 22.03.2022
Jallapur
5
5270(E) Date 03.11.2022
Boravalle
6
829(E) Date 08.05.2023
Pallepadu
7
Mangampet
District: Wanaparthy State: Telangana
Sl.No.
S.O. No. & Date
Name of the Village
Name of the Mandal
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
1716(E) Date 01.06.2020
Burdipadu
Pebbair
2
3299(E) Date 10.08.2021
Shukur
3
3784(E) Date 08.09.2021
Rameshwarpur
4
3878(E) Date 16.09.2021
Pathapalli
5
1390(E) Date 22.03.2022
Chellimilla
6
5271(E) Date 03.11.2022
Kanchiraopalle
7
827(E) Date 08.05.2023
8
1719(E) Date 01.06.2020
Venkatapura
Srirangapur
9
3532(E) Date 07.10.2020
Srirangapur
10
3297(E) Date 10.08.2021
Kambalapur
11
3796(E) Date 08.09.2021
Thatipamula
12
3879(E) Date 16.09.2021
13
1380(E) Date 22.03.2022
14
4913(E) Date 14.10.2022
15
3492(E) Date 05.10.2020
Savaegudem
Wanaparthy
16
3867(E) Date 16.09.2021
Natchahalli
17
1392(E) Date 22.03.2022
Kistagiri
18
4914(E) Date 14.10.2022
Peddagudem
19
830(E) Date 08.05.2023
Rajapet
20
3493(E) Date 05.10.2020
Rajanagar
21
1396(E) Date 22.03.2022
Achutapur
22
4915(E) Date 14.10.2022
Chityala
23
831(E) Date 08.05.2023
Peddamandadi
Peddamandadi
24
1718(E) Date 01.06.2020
Chinnamandadi
25
3534(E) Date 07.10.2020
Pamireddipalle
26
3300(E) Date 10.08.2021
Veeraipalle
27
3798(E) Date 08.09.2021
Solipur
Ghanpur
28
3875(E) Date 16.09.2021
Manajipeta
29
1379(E) Date 22.03.2022
Malkapur
30
5272(E) Date 03.11.2022
Ghanpur
31
826(E) Date 08.05.2023
Agaram
32
Kamaluddinpur
33
Thirmalaipalli
3796
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :SEPTEMBER 7, 2024/BHADRA 16, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
District: Mahbubnagar State: Telangana
Sl.No.
S.O. No. & Date
Name of the Village
Name of the Mandal
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
2248(E) Date 07.07.2020
Kappeta
Bhoothpur
2
3298(E) Date 10.08.2021
Patha Molgara
3
3799(E) Date 08.09.2021
Kotha Molgara
4
3873(E) Date 16.09.2021
Bhoothpur
5
1393(E) Date 22.03.2022
Kothur
6
5274(E) Date 03.11.2022
Tadparti
7
825(E) Date 08.05.2023
8
2508(E) Date 29.07.2020
Chinaboinpalle
Jadcherla
9
1378(E) Date 22.03.2022
Alur
10
3303(E) Date 10.08.2021
Boorgupally
11
3797(E) Date 08.09.2021
Nagasal
12
3876(E) Date 16.09.2021
Nasrullabad
13
5273(E) Date 03.11.2022
Gangapur
14
3533(E) Date 07.10.2020
Gopulapuram
15
3795(E) Date 08.09.2021
Kodgal
16
3301(E) Date 10.08.2021
Edganpalle
Rajapur
17
1382(E) Date 22.03.2022
18
828(E) Date 08.05.2023
19
2507(E) Date 29.07.2020
Thirumalagiri
Balanagar
20
3872(E) Date 16.09.2021
Modampalli
21
1387(E) Date 22.03.2022
Peddarevelly
22
5276(E) Date 03.11.2022
Hemajipur
23
Lingaram
District: Nagarkurnool State: Telangana
Sl.No.
S.O. No. & Date
Name of the Village
Name of the Mandal
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
2252(E) Date 07.07.2020
Marikalkurdu
Thimmajipet
2
3880(E) Date 16.09.2021
3
1381(E) Date 22.03.2022
District: Rangareddy State: Telangana
Sl.No.
S.O. No. & Date
Name of the Village
Name of the Mandal
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
3061(E) Date 02.09.2020
Ippalapalle
Keshampet
2
4288(E) Date 26.11.2020
Vemulanarva
3
5277E) Date 03.11.2022
Sangam
4
832(E) Date 08.05.2023
Eklaskanpet
5
1721(E) Date 01.06.2020
Siddapur
Kothur
6
4284(E) Date 26.11.2020
Bhadraipally
7
1386(E) Date 22.03.2022
Kodicherla
8
5279(E) Date 03.11.2022
9
2462(E) Date 27.07.2020
Kodlapadakal
Maheswaram
10
4287(E) Date 26.11.2020
Subhanpur
11
1384(E) Date 22.03.2020
Kalwakole
12
5275(E) Date 03.11.2022
Ameerpet
13
2461(E) Date 27.07.2020
Toopra Khurd
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 7, 2024/भाद्र 16, 1946
3797
14
1383(E) Date 22.03.2022
Nagireddipalle
15
3302(E) Date 10.08.2021
Gollor
16
3785(E) Date 08.09.2021
Nandipalli
17
4916(E) Date 14.10.2022
Dond Shankarapura
Shamshabad
18
4286(E) Date 26.11.2020
Sanghiguda
19
3871(E) Date 16.09.2021
Golkonda Khurd
20
5278(E) Date 03.11.2022
Bacharam
Abdullapurmet
District: Medchal Malkajigiri State: Telangana
Sl.No.
S.O. No. & Date
Name of the Village
Name of the Mandal
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
1717(E) Date 01.06.2020
Yemnampet
Ghatkesar
2
4285(E) Date 26.11.2020
Ismailkhanguda
3
3874(E) Date 16.09.2021
Korremula
4
1385(E) Date 22.03.2022
Annojiguda
5
Rampalli
Keesra
[F. No. R-12031/2/2019-OR-I/E-31417]
S. S. SINGH, Under Secy.
Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=ky;
नई दिल्ली, 29 अगस्ट् त, 2024
का.आ. 1697.—vkS?kksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 (a1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
स्ट्टेट बैंक ऑफ़ इंजड ा ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS?kksfxd fookn esa
dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS?kksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] भुबनेश्वर ds iapkV (72/2021) izdkf'kr djrh gSA
[सं. एल-12011/42/2020-आई.आर(बी-I)]
सलोनी, उृ जनिेिक
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
New Delhi, the 29th August, 2024
S.O. 1697.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 72/2021) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of
India and their workmen.
[No. L-12011/42/2020-IR(B-I)]
SALONI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR
Present:
Sri Dinesh Kumar Singh,
Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour Court,
Bhubaneswar.
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 72/2021
Date of Passing Order – 21st June, 2024
3798
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :SEPTEMBER 7, 2024/BHADRA 16, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Between :-
The Chief General Manager,
State Bank of India, Local Head Office,
Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Bhubaneswar, Orissa – 759 024.
The Branch Manager, State Bank of India,
Balichandrapur Branch, Balichandrapur,
Jajpur – 754 205.
…
1st Party-Managements.
(And)
The President,
State Bank of India Karmachari Union (CITU)
VR-5/1, Kharvela Nagar, Unit-3,
Bhubaneswar – 1.
…
2nd Party-Union.
Appearances:
None.
…
For the 1st Party-Managements.
None.
…
For the 2nd Party-Union.
ORDER
In the present case, a reference was received from the Section Officer to the Government of India, Ministry
of Labour & Employment, New Delhi vide order No. L-12011/42/2020 – IR(B-I), dated 04.01.2020 under clause (d)
of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for adjudication of a
dispute, under the following schedule:-
“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India in denying the benefits like stagnation of
wage revision and withdrawal of medical allowance to Shri Bhagirathi Nayak, Temporary messenger is
legal and/or justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?”
2.
In the reference order, the Under Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment, New
Delhi commanded the parties raising the dispute to file statement of claim, complete with relevant documents, list of
reliance and witnesses with this Tribunal within 15 days of receipt of the reference order and to forward a copy of
such statement of claim to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.
3.
Despite directions so given, no statement of claim is received from the 2nd party-Union.
4.
On receipt of the above reference, notice was sent to the 2nd Party-Union 20.12.2021, 29.06.2022 and finally
on 02.05.2023 for appearance and for filing of statement of claim. Neither the postal article sent to the 2nd Party-
Union, referred to above, was received back nor was it observed by the Tribunal that postal services remained
unserved in the period, referred to above. Therefore, every presumption lies in favour of the fact that the above
notices were served upon the 2nd Party- Union. Despite service of the notice, the 2nd Party-Union opted to abstain
away from the proceedings. No claim statement was filed on its behalf. Thus, it is clear that the 2nd Party-Union is not
interested in adjudication of the reference on merits.
5.
Since the 2nd Party-Union has neither filed statement of claim nor has led any evidence so as to prove its
cause against the Management, it is presumed that there is no claim of workman against the Management.
6.
In view of such, no claim Order is passed by this Tribunal.
7.
Let this order be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947, for publication.
Dictated & Corrected by me.
DINESH KUMAR SINGH, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 4 जसतम् बर, 2024
का.आ. 1698.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्री सरकार
मेससज एचृीसीएल बा ोफ् ूल्स जलजमटेड के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री सूरि कुमार के बीच अनुबंि में जनर्िजष्ट
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 7, 2024/भाद्र 16, 1946
3799
केन्द्री सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न् ा ाल , ृटना, ृंचाट (ठरफरेन्स नं.-14 (C) of 2019) को िजसा दक
अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा िज, प्रकाजित करती िज िो केन्द्री सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉृी के सा 16.08.2024 को प्राप्त हुआ
ा l
[सं. एल-30012/34/2019-आईआर(एम)]
दिलीृ कुमार, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 4th September, 2024
S.O. 1698.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Reference No. 14 (C) of 2019) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal cum Labour Court, Patna as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to M/s HPCL, Biofuels Ltd. and Shri Suraj Kumar which was received along with soft copy of the award
by the Central Government on 04.09.2024.
[No. L-30012/34/2019-IR(M)]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, PATNA.
Reference Case No. :-14 (C) of 2019
Between the management of the Chief Executive Officer, M/S HPCL, Biofuels Ltd., NH-271, Road .- 3E,
New Patliputra, Patna-800013 And Their workmen Sri Suraj Kumar, C/O- Rajnath Mishra, Post- Sugauli, P.S-
Sugauli, Opp. Sugaili Railway Station, District- East Champaran (Bihar) – 845456.
For the management:-
Sri Alok Kumar Sinha, Advocate.
For the workman:-
Sri Chandra Shekhar Prasad, Advocate.
Sri Rajesh Sahay, Advocate.
Present:-
Manoj Shankar
Presiding Officer,
Industrial Tribunal, Patna.
AWARD
Patna, dt- 19th August, 2024.
By the adjudication order no.- L-30012/34/2019-IR(M) New Delhi, dated- 25.07.2019 the Govt. of India
Ministry of Labour New Delhi has referred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of
the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, ( hereinafter to be referred to as “ the Act”) the following dispute between the
management of the Chief Executive Officer, M/S HPCL, Biofuels Ltd., NH-271, Road .- 3E, New Patliputra, Patna-
800013 And Their workmen Sri Suraj Kumar, C/O- Rajnath Mishra, Post- Sugauli, P.S- Sugauli, Opp. Sugauli
Railway Station, District- East Champaran (Bihar) – 845456 for adjudication to this tribunal.
SCHEDULE
“ Whether the demand vide letter dated 23.10.2018 of the workman Sri Suraj Kumar and others of HPCL,
Biofuels Ltd. Sugauli for (a) Pay Revision & (b) Payment of allowance are proper, legal and justified? If
yes, what relief they are entitled for? What directions, if any, are necessary in the matter?”
2.
As per the statement of claim of the workmen, their case is that HPCL Biofuels Ltd. was incorporated in
Oct. 2009 as a wholly owned subsidiaries of HPCL and set up integrated Sugar, Ethanol and Co-gen Power Plants by
reviving two closed Sugar Mills namely Sugauli and Lauraya in the State of Bihar. Accordingly in the process of
establishing its commercial production in the above locations, applications were invited for eligible candidates for
their employment on different post vide employment news edition 21-27 Nov.,2009 and again vide employment news
edition 21-27th August,2010. It is further asserted that in pursuance of both the advertisements these workmen applied
for their required post as per their eligibility criterion, General Information and Instruction. It is further asserted that
after scrutiny of the applications, they were called for written examination followed by interview as well and finally
after medical test and police verification they were selected on their respective posts and all these workmen are given
appointment letters and subsequently these workmen joined on their respective post on different dates as per
appointment letters. It is further asserted that in both advertisements, the total post had been put in four salary slabs,
3800
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :SEPTEMBER 7, 2024/BHADRA 16, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
for the post of account clerk, store clerk, H.R clerk and purchase clerk the yearly salary was fixed 1.14 Lac to
1.25 Lacs. that shows initial they were required to be paid a sum of Rs. 9,500/- per month. Whereas for the post of
Area cane supervisor, second class boiler, bagasse carrier attendant, attendant motor / tube well, boiling house fitter,
electrician, wheel fitter, DCS operator, wear house step, instrument mechanic, Lab attendant, welder and peon, etc
yearly salary as fixed @ Rs. 1.08 Lac to 1.25 Lacs. and accordingly they required to be paid salary of Rs. 9,000/- for
the post of data processor / clerk the yearly salary was fixed @ Rs. 1.08 Lac to 1.15 Lacs. Accordinglyo this slab they
were required to be paid a sum of Rs. 9,000/- P.M. For the post kamgar and weight bridge operator yearly salary was
fixed 0.96 Lac to 1.08 Lacs. As per this slab they were required to be paid a sum of Rs. 8,000/- per month. It is further
asserted that as per both the establishment there was a clause that the candidates appointed will be placed under
probation of one year in their respective post / grade / pa scale but none of these workmen were paid as per their pay
scale during the probation period. It is further asserted that in pursuance of clause 2 of appointment letter, salary was
fixed much lesser than in pursuance of terms of those advertisements. For example as per advertisement, the salary of
DCS operator @ Rs. 9,000/- per month, whereas in the appointment letter the starting basic salary was fixed
Rs. 3500/- per month stating there in that the salary is under revision and the revised salary will be paid on
confirmation of service. But even after confirmation of service of these workmen the basic salary was neither revised
nor paid in pursuance in terms of advertisements. Hence these workman are entitled to get their basic salary as per the
terms of advertisements from the date of joining till the probation period and thereafter they were entitled to get their
salary with increment as per slab in the advertisements. It is further asserted that as per terms of the advertisements,
these workmen were required to pay Industrial Dearness Allowance ( IDA ) and these workmen were also required to
pay other applicable allowances and benefits admissible as per company rules enforced from time to time but none of
these workmen were paid IDA applicable from time to time. It is further asserted that these workmen was paid in sum
of amount of VDA. It is further asserted that these workmen were not permitted to see company rules which was
applicable with respect to other allowances and benefits. It is further asserted that these workmen were paid house
rent allowance (HRA), interim relief (IR) but only for few months. It is further asserted that neither any medical
benefits is being provided to the workmen since their appointment nor and they were covered under the scheme of
Employees Insurance Scheme ( ESI ). It is further asserted that on approach to the management by these workmen,
they were asked during the probation period, the salary is under revision and on getting approval from the Head
Office the basic salary with allowances and others benefits will be paid as per advertisements with arrear but nothing
is complied by the management. It is further asserted that even after confirmation, neither the basic salary nor IDA
and other allowances are being paid to these workmen as per the terms of advertisements. Even the benefits as
mentioned as column no.- 7 of the advertisement was not paid any time as per company rules enforced from time to
time. It is further asserted that even after several request, management company did not provide its company rules to
these workmen. It is further asserted that these workmen from time to time agitated their issue before the management
but their no grievances was redressed by the management. Ultimately these workmen vide letter dt- 23.10.2018
approached to ALC (C) Pakur where conciliation proceeding started on different dates. But management side did not
give any reply / comments. Ultimately their dispute was referred by the appropriate Govt. to this tribunal.
3. On the other hand management side filed written statement stating therein, all the grievances as raised on behalf of
the workmen and cause of action prayed therein is not maintainable and it is devoid of merits and not based on sound
foundations / principles as the salary structure of all permanent non-management workers engaged in the company are
governed by the policy decision of the Government which is an executive decision, enforced by the sugar wage board
and all of them are being paid salary and wages as per the same since appointment without even slightest of
deviations. It is further asserted that at the time of appointment all the details and intricacies related to salary structure
were explained to the complainants ( workmen ) which have been endorsed b them to the company by acceptance
letters and as such it can not been re-winded and back tracked as per one own sweet will, which the complainants has
been done. It is further asserted that for the purpose of wage fixation in Sugar Industries, the wage board has grouped
sugar production area into four regions, Bihar comes under North Zone along with Punjab, West Bengal, Uttar
Pradesh and Assam. It is further asserted that in the light of U.P Notification, a Tripartite Agreement comprising
Employer’s and Employee’s representative and Bihar Government was made on 07.02.1990, 06.11.1990, 04.06.1991,
07.01.2006 and on 07.04.2010 that any notification by U.P Government relating to monetary benefits for Sugar Mills
workers will be applicable exactly the same way for the workers in Sugar Industries in Bihar. Accordingly Sugar
wage revision is implemented in Bihar. It is further asserted that these Government notifications are applicable all
Vacuum Pan Sugar factories of the state and also applicable of all workmen of sugar factories who are covered under
the definitions of “workmen” in the Industrial Dispute Act. It is further asserted that as per settlement between
Tripartite Standing Committee ( Sugar ), periodical revision of Sugar wage is done and notified by the Labour
Commissioner, Govt. of Bihar for compliance to all sugar factories in Bihar, hence after confirmation salaries of all
Non management employees were revised in accordance with revised sugar wage scales and further all other inclusive
of Variable Dearness Allowance (VDA) and fixed allowance (FA) being parts under sugar wage structure are also
been paid to all complainants ( workmen ). Here complainants raised their issue against the company on false
propositions i.e fit to be dismissed. It is further stated that company, after completion of the selection process gave
appointment letters to all the successful candidates including the complainant in which all clauses and scope of the
work were mentioned including the salary structure which was readily accepted and duly acknowledge by them in the
second copy of the letters. It is further asserted that all the parameters associated with the profile were brought in
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 7, 2024/भाद्र 16, 1946
3801
black and white by the company and the offer of the company were duly accepted by the complainants without any
undue influence hence their contention the company has played fraud and forgery with them, is totally wrong and
denied and so relief as prayed by the workmen should not be entertained. It is further asserted that in both the
advertisement published in the November 2009 and in August 2010 the payment of CTC was wrongly mentioned due
to inadvertent clerical mistake of the company and after realization as per the guidance of the sugar wage board it was
corrected and thus the grievance of the petitioners on this front should be dismissed as the company is totally
governed by the policy of the sugar board ( government ) and can’t deviate. It is further asserted that in the same
advertisements Industrial Dearness Allowance( IDA ) was mentioned under clause-7 however all the employees were
actually being paid VDA as per sugar wage direction right after their appointments. During beginning of the
employment of 1st batch itself the mistake was identified and addressed immediately by the company management
and the actual salary payment to the employees recruited through 1st and 2nd advertisement, commenced with VDA as
per sugar wage board. It is further asserted that in the appointment letter as well as in confirmation letter, only
“Dearness Allowance” is written as opposed to the contention of the claimants at paragraph-8 showing IDA has been
mentioned in the appointment letter i.e also based on false and frivolous ground. It is further asserted that from the
time of appointment, the salary of the complainants were being paid according to the Sugar Wage Board as mentioned
in the appointment letters and the components payable after confirmation are being done in accordance with Sugar
Wage Board and out of the payable salaries only 12% of the employees PF contribution are been deducted as per EPF
Act. It is further asserted that HRA and medical allowances are not the components of the Sugar Wage Structure. It is
further asserted that the claim of the workmen they are not covered under ESI Scheme is wrong as per section 1 (4) of
the ESI Act, 1948 applies to all the factories others than season factory. Therefore, HPCL being a seasonal factory is
exempted from the said Act. It is further asserted that in the notification of dt- 30.09.2016 clause – 4(C) dealt
categorically with the VDA and the same will be calculated on the basis of All India Consumer price index number (
base year= 1960-100 ) and the VDA payable upto consumer price index number 4603 has been merged in the basic
pay. It is further asserted that the calculation of VDA shall be made at the rate of Rs. 2.35 per point and the revision
of VDA shall be made on quarterly basis on January 1st, April 1st, July 1st and October 1st every year and as per the
instructions the same was being paid to the complainants. It has been further asserted that the claim of the
complainants about non payment of medical facility also lacks substance as it has been dealt with clearly in clause 9
of the aforesaid notification. It is also asserted that company is duty bound to take care all its employees including the
complainants and as a matter of fact they are being provided as medical rooms with necessary amenities and
medicines hence the issue raised by the complainants have been take care of by the company in a most effective and
efficient manner. It is further asserted that the averment of the complainants about non payment of bonus is wrong as
all eligible employees the complainants have been paid bonus by the company for FY 2017-18 as per the provision of
Payment of Bonus Act, 1965. It is further asserted that all the grievances and reliefs prayed for complainants have
lucidly been taken care of by the company and have been dealt with comprehensive details in the written statement.
Moreover, company have also given ample chance to the complainants following the principle of natural justice but
they have raised grievances which should out rightly be rejected and dismissed as the reliefs prayed are not
maintainable and it is devoid of merit.
4. In order to establish the claim of workmen, they examined altogether two witnesses namely Suraj Kumar (W.W-1)
and Vivek Kumar ( W.W-2 ). Besides oral evidence workmen sides filed some documents in connection with their
claim i.e marked as Ext.:-
(i)
Ext.-W/1 Advertisement for the selection of different post inHPCL Biofuels of employment news edition 21-
27.11.2009.
(ii)
Ext.-W/1-1 Advertisement for the post of HPCL Biofuels published employment news edition 21-27.08.2010.
(iii)
Ext.-W/2 Zerox copy of the appointment letters of all the 37 workmen shown from page- 15 to 151.
(iv)
Ext.- W/3 to W/3-19 Pay slip of all the 37 workmen showing from page 152 to 265.
(v)
Ext.-W/4 Complaint letter of dt- 23.10.2018 raised by the all the 37 workmen before the ALC (C) Pakur.
(vi)
Ext.-W/5 Photo copy of the notification issued from time to time with regards to the IDA by Central
Government for public enterprises shown from page 269 to 372.
(vii)
Ext.-W/6 to W/6-36 Arrear chart as per claim of the 37 workmen shown from page 373 to 446.
(viii)
Ext.-W/7 Salary slip of Vivek Kumar of March 2011.
(a)
Ext.-W/7-1 Salary slip of Suraj Kumar March 2011.
(b)
Ext.-W/7-2 Salary sheet of Suraj Kumar Jan.2022.
(c)
Ext.- W/7-3 Salary sheet of Vivek Kumar Jan. 2022.
(ix)
Ext.-W/8 Representation petition for the IDA and per otherallowances given to the management by the
37 workmen.
3802
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :SEPTEMBER 7, 2024/BHADRA 16, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(x)
W/8-1 Representation petition regarding IDA given by theworkmen to the Chief Executive Officer.
(xi)
Ext.-W/8-2 Representation petition for non payment of actual salary and other allowances as per the
advertisement letter dt- 08.10.2018 given to Human Resources Department (HRD) HPCL Sugauli
5.On the other hand management side examined altogether three witnesses namely Sanjay Kumar (M.W-1), Ramesh
Kumar Mishra (M.W-2) and Abhishek Kumar Singh (M.W-3). Besides oral evidence management side filed some
documents and get it marked as Exts:-
(i)
Ext.- M/1 Annual financial report 2018-19, 2019-20 ( two page at page 7 & 8 )
(ii)
Ext.-W/2 Flow chart of process follow of HPCL Biofuels shown of page 9 to 11.
(iii)
Ext.-M/3 Group Personnel Insurance of employees of HPCL Biofuels ( page 12 to 14 )
(iv)
Ext.-M/4 Letter of dt- 20.04.2016 issued by CEO to Ministry of Petroleum of Natural Gas and its
reply to the permanent employees of HPCL sent by CEO shown at page 15 & 16.
(v)
Ext.-M/5 HR policy of HPCL page 19 to 45.
(vi)
Ext.- M/6 Appointment letter of dt-31.12.2010 issued to Suraj Kumar, by Chief Executive Officer.
(vii)
Ext.-M/7 Order of the Hon’ble High Court Madras dt-28.02.2011 passed in W.P No.-45431 of
2006.
6.
Now this tribunal securitizes the evidence of workmen Sri Suraj Kumar ( W.W-1 ) who is employee of
HPCL Biofuels at Sugauli who supported all the averments as stated in statement of claim from the 37 workmen in
examination-in-chief. He further stated that HPCL Biofuels Ltd was incorporated in October 2009 as wholly owned
subsidiary company of HPCL and set up for integrated Sugar, Ethanol, Co Zen Power plant by reviving 2 closed
Sugar Mills Sugauli and Lauriya in the State of Bihar. This witness further stated that he HPCL invited application of
eligible candidates by publishing advertisement for different post twice in employment news edition 21-27.11.2009
and 21-27.08.2010 and proved the same as Ext.-W/1 & W/1-1repectively. This witness further stated that all the
workmen applied on their require post as per eligible criterion general information and instruction of the
advertisement. This witness further stated that after appearing in written examination followed by interview and
medical test and police verification all the 37 workmen were selected on their respective post and they were given
appointment letters by the workmen. This witness further stated that all the 37 workmen joined with objection on their
respective post on different dates as per appointment letters proved as Ext.-W/2. This witness further stated about the
salary slabsof different category as mentioned in the both the advertisement. This witness further stated that in both
the advertisement there was a clause that the candidates appointed will be placed under probation for one year in their
respective post / grade / pay scale but none of the workmen were paid as per their scale during the probation period
rather the management mentioned in clause-2 of the appointment letter a lesser salary than in pursuance of terms of
advertisement published in employment news. This witness further stated that even after confirmation of the service
basic salary was not revised as per the terms of advertisement published in the employment news, however all the
workmen are entitled to basic salary as per terms of the advertisement. This witness further stated that the
management did not pay any IDA to the workmen as per terms of the advertisement rather some amount in the name
of VDA has been paid to the workmen and company rules was never shown by the management to the aggrieved
workmen. This witness further stated that workmen were paid HRA and IR ( interim relief ) only for few months but
neither the medical benefits was provided nor they are covered under ESI. This witness further stated that when they
raised their grievances before the management they have told by the management, salaries is under revision and on
getting approval from the head office, all the basic salary and other allowances will be paid at the terms of
advertisement. This witness further proved the salaries and other allowances sheet of all the category of the workmen
from January 2011 to July 2019. This witness further proved the pay slips of all the category of 37 workmen from
January 2011 to July 2019 i.e marked as Ext.-W/3 to W/3-19. This witness further stated that all the workmen from
time to time agitated the matter before the management for their basic salary and other allowances not given as per
given terms of advertisement but they were unheard ultimately they raised their grievances before the ALC (C) Pakur
on 23.10.2018 and this witness proved the complaint of dt- 23.10.2018 filed before the ALC(C) Pakur as Ext.-W/4.
This witness further stated that management side did not ready to redress the grievance of workmen as raised before
the conciliation officer then our matter is referred to this tribunal. This witness further proved the photo copy of the
notification issued from time to time with regard to IDA by the Central Government as Ext.-W/5. This witness further
proved the accrued arrears of all the workmen on the basis of the terms of advertisement as Ext.-W/6 to W/6-36. This
witness further stated that plea taken by the management side in its written statement is baseless and in correct as
salary and wages as per Sugar Industries does not applicable to this Industries. This witness further stated that neither
the Executive decision of the Government can be enforced by Sugar Wages Board nor any agreement comprising his
employer and employee representative of Sugar Mills workers can be applicable to this industries. This witness
further stated that the plea taken by the management in its written statement regarding wrong mentioning of CTC in
advertisement is totally false and baseless. This witness further stated that the appointment letter given to the
workmen are contrary to the terms of both the employment news moreover, HPCL Biofuels Ltd is not a seasonal
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 7, 2024/भाद्र 16, 1946
3803
factory and so the plea taken by the management regarding application of rules and regulation salary structure and
other benefits is totally incorrect and baseless.
In cross-examination this witness categorically admits that in para-21 that he is doing work of DCS operator.
He used to discharged the duties of eight hours shift wise. This witness also admits in para-12 that there is leave of 10
CL, 16 EL, and 12 SL ( Special leave ) appliable in the factory duty. This witness further admits that he is deposing
on behalf of all the workmen whose issue are here in this case for adjudication. This witness categorically admits in
para-23 of the cross-examination that he received the appointment letter from HPCL Biofuels Ltd i.e Subsidiary units
of HPCL. This witness further admits that in para-29 of the cross-examination that he put his signature on the
appointment letter after going through the terms and condition annexed with the appointment letter. This witness
further stated in para-30 of the cross-examination he raised the issues of all the workmen regarding non payment of
IDA, medical allowances, HRA and Misc. allowances as per advertisement. This witness further admits in para-31 of
the cross-examination that basic salary VDA and FA are mentioned in the salary ship but he also claims regarding
washing allowances, Mobile Allowances and travelling allowances. This witness further admits in para-35 of the
cross-examination that whatever the salary slip issued by the company to the workmen they got increment after
confirmation. In para-36 of the cross-examination this witness categorically stated that they raised their grievances
before ALC (C) Pakur on 23.10.2018 for the first time before that they were always alarmed to the Board but they
were always assured to redress the grievances but it was not done by then CEO Sexana Sahab. In para-39 of the cross-
examination this witness admits that in the advertisement nothing is mentioned about HRA but salary slab was shown.
In para-41 of the cross-examination this witness categorially stated that his Ext.-W/5 described about IDA notified by
the Central Government for the time to time and all the workmen made claim of IDA on that basis. In para-42 of the
cross-examination this witness categorically stated that the salary slips he filed of all the workmen does not disclose
about HR. In para-43 this witness categorically stated that whatever the medical allowance should be given by the
company i.e not being complied. This witness categorically admits in para-45 of the cross-examination HPCL
Biofuels does not Govern under Sugar Board. In para-47 of the cross-examination this witness categorically admits
when he joined HPCL Biofuels he was getting Rs. 6625/- salary after deduction and now he is receiving Rs. 18300/-
per month.
7.
W.W-2 Vivek Kumar is one of the workman whose dispute is under this reference also supported the
grievances of 37 workmen as asserted in their statement of claim. He also fully corroborated about the details of the
two advertisement by which all the 37 workmen after appearing in the written examination followed by interview,
they were selected on their respective posts. This witness further stated that he was appointed on the post of Data
Processer cum Clerk on 09.11.2010. This witness also supported the slab of salary of different posts that was
advertised through two advertisement. This witness further supported that as per advertisement salary of DCS
Operator was Rs. 9000/- P.M where as in the appointment letter the starting salary was fixed Rs. 3500/- P.M stating
therein that the salary is under revision that will be paid on confirmation of service. This witness further stated that
even after confirmation of service neither he nor other workmen got revised salary in terms of both advertisement
published in employment news. So all the workmen are entitled to get basic salary as per salary slab given in
advertisement. This witness thoroughly corroborated the whole version of Suraj Kumar W.W-1 in his examination-in-
chief. This witness proved his salary slip of March-2011 and January-2022 i.e marked as Ext.-W/7 and W/7-3
respectively. This witness also proved the salary slip of Suraj Kumar of March-2011 and January-2022 as Ext.-W/7-1
and Ext.-W/7-2. This witness further proved the application regarding D.A submitted by all the 37 workmen to the
management in year 2016, 2017 and 2018 i.e marked as Ext.- W/8, W/8-1, W/8-2 respectively.
In cross-examination this witness admits in para-15 he is still posted on the post of Data Processor in HPCL
Biofuels i.e sister concern of HPCL. In para-19 of the cross-examination, this witness categorically admits that HPCL
manufacture ethanol, electric power generation, and sugar. Sugar is the main source for production of the ethanol. In
para-22 of the cross-examination this witness categorically stated that his grievances is related to the salary, IDA, as
per the advertisement published in employment news and in para-23 this witness categorically stated that whatever
the salary slab was advertised in employment news payment of salary was not given by the management and besides
this their grievances is also related with VDA, HRA and Medical allowance. In para-28 of the cross-examination this
witness categorically stated that there is enhanced in the salary from the initial appointment but it is not enhanced to
the actual proportion that ought to be given by the management to the workmen. This witness categorically admits in
para-30 of the cross-examination that initially they received V.D.A, H.R.A and M.Abut it was stopped later on for
which they raised grievance in the year 2015-16. This witness also stated that management always assured to redress
their grievance but nothing is done then they raised the dispute before the Industrial Tribunal. In para-35 of the cross-
examination this witness categorically stated that he does not know whether HPCL Biofuels come under the sugar
board.
8. Now this tribunal securitizes the evidence of management side out of them M.W-1 Sanjay Kumar who is HR
Officer at HBL Lauriya Unit. Who stated before this tribunal that the grievances of the workmen are salary paid to
them at the time of joining less than the amount as stated in the advertisement,. V.D.A is being paid in place of I.D.A,
Dearness allowance, H.R.A are not being paid, no Medical Allowance facility is given and workmen are not covered
under the ESIC scheme. This witness further stated that Sugar factories Sugauli and Lauriya were taken over by the
3804
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :SEPTEMBER 7, 2024/BHADRA 16, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
HPCL in the year-2009 and for working of the two Sugar factories, a separate subsidiary company i.e HPCL Biofuels
was incorporated by HPCL. This witness further stated that the HR of the HPCL framed the notice inviting
applications from desirous candidates for the non-management work. This witness further stated that company has
consistently cared for its workmen and always gave salaries and other perquisites as allowed by the Sugar Wage
Board from time to time. This witness further stated that nearly 80-85% of the company’s jobs is the production of
Sugar for which the workmen are also engaged and hardly 15-20% of the output goes into the production of Ethanol.
This witness further stated that production of sugar is seasonal in nature which merely goes for only 2-3 months but
company is paying its workmen salary for the entire year. This witness further stated that as per notification of Sugar
Wage Board salary is being paid and as per section 1(4) of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 all the seasonal
factories are exempted. This witness further stated that company is giving proper salary and VDA and fixed
allowances as per notification of Sugar Wage Board. This witness further stated that the grievances of workmen they
have never been shared about the HR policy of the company is quite wrong because i.e available on the website. This
witness further stated that company has also consistently revising the salary of all its workmen and they are all
drawing a decent salary.Since all the workmen are the native of same area they have own house and accommodation
so they do not require any HRA. This witness further stated the grievances of the workmen are false and frivolous.
This witness further proved the financial position of HPCL Biofuels of the year 2019-20 signed by the Director i.e
marked as Ext.- M/1. This witness also proved the process flow chart of HPCL Biofuels i.eis in three pages marked as
Ext.-M/2. This witness further proved the group personnel insurance of the employees taken from the Oriental
Insurance Company i.eis three pages marked as Ext.- M/3. This witness proved the letter of dt- 20.04.2016 issued by
company to the Secretary of Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, regarding grievances of I.D.A i.e marked as
Ext.-M/4. This witness further proved the HR policy of the HPCL Biofuels i.e 27 in pages marked as Ext.-M/5. This
witness further stated that company is giving VDA its employee instead of I.D.A.
In cross-examination this witness categorically stated that in para-18 that there are two types of the
employees in his company one management employees and another non-management employees. Seasonal
employees are also covered under non-management employees. In para-19 this witness categorically stated that the
selection process of non-management employees or seasonal employees is same but at the same breath in para-21 this
witness stated he does not know the selection mode of the seasonal employees. This witness categorically denied that
the documents Ext.-M/3 is forged but he admits that there is no seal of management and Oriental Insurance Company
on the document because it is computer generated documents. In para-31 of the cross-examination this witness
categorically stated that HPCL Biofuels Ltd is the subsidiary company of HPCL but HPCL is not the controlling
company of the employees HPCL Biofuels. In para- 34 of the cross-examination this witness categorically stated that
there is no control of HPCL on the management employees non-management employees and seasonal employees of
HBL. This witness categorically stated in para-35 of the cross-examination he has no knowledge about written
statement of the company filed here and in para-39 this witness adjusts that workmen whose grievances is under this
reference are employees of HPCL Biofuels.
9. M.W-2 Ramesh Kumar Mishra is the manager HR head quarter of the HPCL Biofuels Ltd also tried to support the
version of M.W-1 in examination-in-chief and also proved the documents already got Extd. by the M.W-1 in his
evidence.
In cross-examination this witness admitted in para-16 that HPCL Biofuels is the registered company but he
can’t say whether in copy of registration is submitted before this tribunal or not. In para-23 this witness categorically
admits that HPCL Generated Power for its factory only. In para-24 of the cross-examination this witness stated that
Ethanol and production of electricity is based on the Bio product of the Sugar cane. In para-29 of the cross-
examination this witness admits that the documents of insurance company ( Ext.-M/3) is not authenticated by the
management and in para- 30 this witness admits that no paper submitted from the management for the period of
grievances as raised by the workmen.
10. M.W-3 Abhishek Kumar is Senior Project Engineer of HPCL Biofuels at Sagauli who also tried to support the
version in his examination-in-chief what is already stated by M.W-1 and M.W-2 in their evidence. There is no
difference at all in the evidence of all the three witnesses. This witness further stated that HBL has incurred a loss of
around Rs. 783 croresin the last 10 years. This witness also stated that as per the letter of appointment it is mentioned
D.A and other allowances but no I.D.A is mentioned in the appointment letter and the company is providing all types
of allowances as fixed and revised by Sugar Wage Board from time to time. This witness further stated that HPCL is
involved in the sugar cane for the production of sugar and the production of finished goods throughbiproducts. This
witness also stated that the grievances of the workmen are false and frivolous. This witness categorically stated in
para-9 that appointment letter of Suraj Kumar is issued on 31.12.2010 signed by B. Rajesh CEO ( Chief Executive
Officer ) and proved the same as Ext.-M/6. This witness also proved the judgement of the Hon’ble Madras High
Court dt- 28.02.2011 passed in W.P No.- 45431 of 2006 as marked Ext.-M/7.
This witness admits in para-12 of the cross-examination HPCL Biofuels is the subsidiary company of HPCL and it is
fully owned subsidiary company. In para-25 of the cross-examination this witness stated that Ext.-M/6 the
appointment of letter of Suraj Kumar denotes salary description and it is based on the advertisement notification. In
para-26 of the cross-examination this witness categorically stated that Ext.- W/1-1 the appointment letter issued on
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 7, 2024/भाद्र 16, 1946
3805
the basis of advertisement where the salary of DCS operator is shown as 1.08 to 1.25 Lac i.e under cost of company
CTC ( Cost to Company ). In para-28 of the cross-examination this witness categorically stated that he can’t say as
per Ext.-W/1-1 workmen did not get payment. In para- 31 this witness admits that employee gets salary of 12 months
on their respective post whether factory is operational or not. In para-33 this witness admits that HPCL is not
registered under sugar industry.
11. It is argued on behalf of the workmen that this reference is related to the demand letter dt- 23.10.2018 of the 37
workmen of HPCL Biofuels, Sugauli and Lauriya regarding their pay revision and payment of allowances. It is
further argued that it is evident from Ext.-W/1 and Ext.-W/1-1 HPCL after acquisition of two sugar factory Sugauli
and Lauriya for the production of Ethanol and power plant through its subsidiary company incorporated as HPC
Biofuels Ltd, and they invited application for employment for different posts vide employment news 2009 and 2010.
It is further argued that all the 37 workmen also participated in the examination of different posts and after taking
selection in written examination followed by interview they were verified through medical test and finally they were
declared successful and company issued appointment letters to these workmen for their respective post. Ext.-W/2
series is the appointment letters issued to the workmen but on the plain reading of the appointment letter the terms and
condition of their employment differs as mentioned in the advertisement. At that time all the workmen protested on
receiving the appointment letter then management assured them the present salary is under revision they will be paid
after the confirmation of service but even after confirmation their salary is not revised as per terms of advertisement
then the workmen reported their demand to the CEO in Novemebr-2014 & June-2016. It is further argued that when
management did not take any positive step on the grievances of the workmen, workmen preferred CWJC No.- 2930 of
2017 but it was withdrawn with liberty to exhaust their departmental remedies then the workmen raised their dispute
before the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) Patna on 23.10.2018 but management side did not arrivedfor any
settlement then the appropriate Govt. referred the dispute of all the workmen to this tribunal. It is further argued that
management side raised this issue at the time of advertisement there was no relationship of these workmen with the
management but this contention of the management is not at all applicable because when once applications are invited
through advertisement on different post the participants of that selection process is connected with the management
on getting finally selected. It is further argued that Ext.-W/4 the demand letter dt-23.10.2018 that shows that inspite
selection followed by the assurance given by the management, the workmen was not being paid in accordance with
terms of advertisement then grievance was raised by the workmen before appropriate authority but they were unheard
by the officersof the management on different dates. It is further argued by the learned counsel of the workmen that
the contention of the management side, once the appointment letter is accepted by the workmen they can’t raise
dispute regarding revised salary and of other allowances but the facts is, right from receiving the appointment letter,
all the workmen protested regarding their wages and allowances that was not as per terms of advertisement. At that
time management assured the workmen this is under revision and they will receive revised wages and allowances on
confirmation of service that is also written in the appointment letters ( Ext.-W/2 series ). It is further argued that the
witness M.W-1 categorically admitted in his evidence HPCL Biofuels Ltd is subsidiary company of HPCL. M.W-3
also admits the workmen have been appointed on their respective post are being paid accordingly for all 12 months
whether factory is operational or not. This witness also admits that HPCL Biofuels Ltd is not registered under sugar
industry. It is further argued that both the witnesses of the workmen side thoroughly establish their claim regarding
revised pay and allowances not being given by the management company as per terms of advertisement and there is
nothing in their cross-examination that could discard their evidence regarding the dispute as raised. It is further argued
that management side failed to disclose why the workmen was not given salary and allowances as per terms of
agreement. Thus workmen side thoroughly establish their claim through oral and documentary evidence and they are
entitled for the salary and allowances as per terms of advertisement right from confirmation of service.
12. On the other hand it is argued from the management side the reference case can only be adjudicated with respect
to 30 workers who have signed the demand letter dt-23.10.2018 i.e Ext.-W/4. However, workmen side filed the
statement of claim on behalf of 37 workers that can’t be permitted. It is further argued that Sugauli Unit of Biofuels
Ltd was not established and under commercial production as on dates of two advertisements 21-27 Novemeber,2009
and 21-27 August, 2010 ie. Ext.- W/1 & W/1-1. At that time industry was not in existence the two advertisement
clearly stated that Sagauli Unit was in the process ofbeing established and the plant was expected to commence
production in November,2010. It is well settled law that if the “industry”is not in the existence then no ‘industrial
dispute’ can be arise. It is further argued that at the time off two advertisement there was no employer -employee
relationship with the management and workmen so dispute arising out on the basis of two advertisement can not be
said as an industrial dispute. It is further argued that appointment letters i.e Ext.-W/2 is the contract of employment
with the workmen. It is further argued that the dispute referred for adjudication arises of two advertisement and the
alleged right based on the two advertisements are being sought to be enforced which can not be done under provision
of Industrial Dispute because on the dates when these two advertisements were published, there did not exist any
‘contract’ of employment’ with the workmen. So the claim of the workmen does not arise on the basis of two
advertisements. It is further argued that when the workmen accepted the appointment letters where terms and
conditions of their employment is clearly mentioned and subsequently raising dispute of pay revision and allowances
can’t be entertained. It is further argued that as per the appointment letter the workmen are getting salary and
allowances as per their contract of employment, moreover, they never protested or raise any objection or refused the
3806
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :SEPTEMBER 7, 2024/BHADRA 16, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
appointment letter stating, they are not been paid as per advertisement. So they should be stopped from making such
claim. It is further argued that the claim of the workman is stale claim because they have joined their services between
October 2010 to January-2011 ( Exts.- W/2 series ) and since then they are regularly receiving their salary and
allowances as per their agreed contract of the employment and now after eight years they have raised their dispute
vide demand letter dt- 23.10.2018 can’t be qualify as an Industrial Dispute. It is further argued that only two workmen
turned up for evidence so why the other workmen did not come for evidence reasons based known to them.Not
turning up for evidence by other workmen take advantage on the basis of evidence given by two workmen. It is
further argued that no worker came forward to disclose the exact amounts of their claim rather the two witness gave
their evidence without any basis because no calculation has been shown. It is further argued that the workmen have
wrongly interpreted concept of CTC ( Cost to Company ) contained in the advertisement. The concept of CTC is
terms for total salary package of an employment it indicates the total amount of expenses a company spends on an
employee during one year. Workmen side wrongly interpreted to mean “basic salary”. It is further argued that in place
of I.D.A workers are being paid VDA which has been admitted by the W.W-1 & W.W-2 in their evidence. So claim
of the I.D.A by the workmen is baseless. It is further argued that in the two advertisement, it was clearly mentioned
that other applicable allowances and benefits will be admissible as per company rules framed from time to time. It is
further argued that both the workmen W.W-1 & W.W-2 stated they have not been paid medical allowance, fixed
allowances or other any allowances but the facts is these kinds of allowances were never proposed to be paid in the
two advertisement. It is further argued that both the workman witness admitted in their evidence their salary has been
increased after confirmation, so the claim of not getting the revised pay is not correct because workmen side failed to
place any authentic evidence as how much salary should have been increased and management has not increasedthe
same. So the claim of the workmen are baseless and so it should be rejected.
13. In order to suffice the contention of the argument the management representative relied some rulings in
connection with his argument “ if there is no existence of industry no Industrial dispute can be raised.” As it is
reported in AIR 1970 (80) (1407 ) to apply the notification, the condition precedentfor the existence of an industry has
to be satisfy. As in the instant case at the time of advertisement there was no existence of the industry of HPCL
Biofuels. The management relied on the ruling in 2006 ( 3 CLR 298 ) in connection with,“when the workmen
accepted the appointment letter by putting their signature that is indicative they have waived the benefits given in the
two advertisements so they should be estopped of making claim on the basis of two advertisements.” In connection
with stale claim the management side relied on the ruling 2011 (2) PLJR 145,By this ruling management tried to
establish the matter of the workmen was of the year 2010, 2011 but they raised dispute for the first time before the
appropriate authority in year 2018. So their claim is delayed by seven years without any proper justification.
14. This tribunal finds that workmen side has filed accrued arrears chart of all the 37 workmen on the basis of salary
slabs details in the two advertisement on which basis they have been appointed after selection i.e ( Ex.-W/6 Series).
So before discussing regarding their grievances of basic salary, VDA, HRA, MA, and other allowances as per their
letter of demand ( Ext.-W/4 ) and on the basis of the pay slips of the 37 workmen of different categories as filed
shown in Ex.-W/3 Series, it is necessitated to draw a chart showing the list of workmen as per their arrears claim Ex.-
W/6 Series that is as under :-
Sl. No.
Name of
the workmen
Post
Basic
Salary as
per
appoint-
-ment
letter
Page as
per
Statement
of Claim
of
Workmen
With
Annexures.
Salary
Slip of
Workmen
With Exts.
( Exts.-
W/3
Series )
Proposed
Accrued
Arrears
of salary &
Allowances
As per salary
Slab of All
37 Workmen
( Ext.-W/6
Series )
Pages
As per
Arrear
Chart
Of Exts.
-W/6
Series.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1.
Vikash Kr.
Area
Cane
Supervisor.
Rs. 3800/-
18 to 21
Rs.12287/-
Ext.-W/3-1
P-158 to
163.
Ext.-W/6-2
377to378
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 7, 2024/भाद्र 16, 1946
3807
2.
Keshav Kr.
” ”
Rs. 3800/-
30 to 33
----------
Ext.-W/6-1
375to376
3.
Vijay Kumar
Mihra
” ”
Rs. 3800/-
88 to 90
----------
Ext.-W/6-25
423 to 424
4.
Mirinal Kr.
Srivastava
” ”
Rs. 3800/-
95 to 94
----------
Ext.-W/6-23
419 to 420
5.
Imran Khan
” ”
Rs. 3800/-
95 to 98
----------
Ext.-W/6-24
421 to 424
6.
Ritesh Kr.
Jha
Kamdar
Rs. 3500/-
60 to 63
----------
Ext.-W/6-22
417 to 418
Sl. No.
Name of
the workmen
Post
Basic
Salary as
per
appoint-
-ment
letter
Page as
per
Statement
of Claim
of
Workmen
With
Annexures.
Salary
Slip of
Workmen
With Exts.
( Exts.-
W/3
Series )
Proposed
Accrued
Arrears
of salary &
Allowances
As per salary
Slab of All
37 Workmen
( Ext.-W/6
Series )
Pages
As per
Arrear
Chart
Of Exts.
-W/6
Series.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
7.
Saket Pandy
” ”
Rs. 3500/-
80 to 83
----------
Ext.-W/6-20
413 to 414
8.
Rakesh Kr.
Yadaw
” ”
Rs. 3500/-
103 to 106
----------
Ext.-W/6-21
415 to 416
9.
Kamleshwar
Pd.
Srivastava
” ”
Rs. 3500/-
133 to 136
----------
Ext.-W/6-18
409 to 410
10.
Bindabon
Pramanick
” ”
Rs. 3500/-
137 to 139
----------
Ext.-W/6-19
411 to 412
11.
Sujit Kumar
Singh
Lab.
Attendant
-/Peon/
Kamdar
Rs. 3500/-
140 to 143
----------
Ext.-W/6-32
437 to 438
12.
Dhiraj Kr.
” ”
Rs. 3500/-
144 to 147
----------
Ext.-W/6-31
435 to 436
13.
Naresh Kr.
” ”
Rs. 3500/-
148 to 151
----------
Ext.-W/6-29
431 to 432
14.
Suraj Kr.
DCS
Operator
Rs. 3500/-
15 to 17
Rs.11990/-
Ext.-W/3
Page-152 to
157
Ext.-W/7 to
Ext.-W/7-2
Ext.-W/6-6
378 to 379
3808
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :SEPTEMBER 7, 2024/BHADRA 16, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
P-447 to 449
15.
Vijayendra
Pratap
Narain Singh
” ”
Rs. 3500/-
40 to 43
Rs.11870=00
Ext.-W/3-5
P-180 to 186
Ext.-W/6-33
439 to 440
16.
Upendra Kr.
” ”
Rs. 3500/-
57 to 59
Rs.11990=00
Ext.-W/3-10
P-208 to 210
Ext.-W/6-35
443 to 444
17.
Shiv Pd.
Pandey
Fitter
Rs. 3650/-
44 to 46
Rs.12228=00
Ext.-W/3-6
P-187 to 192
Ext.-W/6-12
397 to 398
18.
Chandan
Kishore
Baitha
” ”
Rs. 3650/-
84 to 87
Rs.12228=00
Ext.-W/3-15
P-236 to 241
Ext.-W/6-11
395 to 396
19.
Santosh Kr.
Pd.
Srivastava
” ”
----------
----------
----------
Ext.-W/6-13
399 to 400
20.
Dipu Kr.
Srivastava
Attendant
(Motor/Tube
Well
Attendant
Rs.3500/-
64 to 66
Rs.11990=00
Ext.-W/3-11
P-211 to 217
Ext.-W/6-30
433 to 434
21.
Sunil Kr.
” ”
Rs.3500/-
107 to 110
Rs.11990=00
Ext.-W/3-16
P-242 to 247
Ext.-W/6-27
427 to 423
22.
Niraj Tiwary
Welders
Rs.3650/-
51 to 53
Rs.12228=00
Ext.-W/3-8
P-199 to 204
Ext.-W/6-10
393 to 394
23.
Sonu Kr.
Paswan
” ”
Rs.3650/-
129 to 132
----------
Ext.-W/6-19
391 to 392
24.
Ashok Kr.
Paswan
Electrician
Rs.3800/-
68 to 71
Rs.12411=00
Ext.-W/3-12
P-218 to 223
Ext.-W/6-15
403 to 404
25.
Ramprit
Prajapati
” ”
Rs.3800/-
76 to 79
Rs.12411=00
Ext.-W/3-14
P-218 to 223
Ext.-W/6-14
401 to 402
26.
Rajesh
Baitha
Bagasse
Carrier
Attendant/-
-(Feed
Pump
Attendant)
Rs.3500/-
72 to 75
Rs.11990=00
Ext.-W/3-163
P-242 to 247
Ext.-W/6-3
379 to 380
27.
Neeraj
” ”
Rs.3500/-
99 to 102
----------
Ext.-W/6-34
441 to 442
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 7, 2024/भाद्र 16, 1946
3809
Kr.Roy
28.
Niraj Kr.
Weight
Bridge
Operator
Rs.3500/-
111 to 113
Rs.11990=00
Ext.-W/3-19
P-242 to 247
Ext.-W/6-36
445 to 446
29.
Navin Kr.
Mishra
Finance
Clerk
Rs. 3650/-
22 to 25
Rs.12228=00
Ext.-W/3-2
P-164 to 167
Ext.-W/6-8
389 to 390
30.
Chandan Kr
HR/-
-General
Clerk
Rs. 3650/-
26 to 29
----------
Ext.-W/6-26
385 to 386
31.
Satendra Pd
Kushwaha
Purchase
Clerk
Rs. 3650/-
43 to 36
Rs.12228=00
Ext.-W/3-3
P-168 to 173
Ext.-W/6-5
383 to 384
32.
Ramesh Kr.
Singh
WH/Clerk
(Store-
-Clerk )
Rs. 3650/-
37 to 39
Rs.12228=00
Ext.-W/3-4
P-174 to 179
Ext.-W/6-7
387 to 388
33.
Jinny Issac
2nd Class
Bioler
Attendant-
Cum-
Firman
Rs. 3500/-
47 to 50
Rs.11990=00
Ext.-W/3-7
P-193 to 198
Ext.-W/6-4
381 to 382
34.
Sharan
Piyush
Ware
House
Staff/-
Helper
Rs. 3500/-
54 to 56
Rs.11990=00
Ext.-W/3-79
P-205 to 207
Ext.-W/6-26
425 to 426
35.
Pankaj Kr.
Keshri
Weight
Bridge
Operator
Rs. 3500/-
118 to 121
Rs.11990=00
Ext.-W/3-18
P-254 to 259
Ext.-W/6-29
429 to 430
36.
Amit Kr.
Tiwari
Instrumenta-
-tion
Mechnic
Rs. 3800/-
122 to 124
Rs.12411=00
Ext.-W/3-17
P-248 to 253
Ext.-W/6-16
405 to 406
37.
Vivek Kr.
Date
Processor-
Rs.12622=00
Ext.-W/7-3
P-450
Ext.-W/6-17
407 to 409
15. Considering the facts and materials available on the record as discussed above and submissions as advanced on
behalf of both the sides, this tribunal finds that this claim was raised by Suraj Kumar and 36 workmen of HPCL
Biofuels Ltd, Sugauli vide their demand letter dt- 23.10.2018 ( Ext.-W/4 ) for not getting the salary and allowances as
per advertisement published in the employment news edition 21-27.11.2009 and 2nd time 21-27.08.2010 (Ext.-W/1 &
W/1-1) the basis of their core issue is demand letter of dt- 23.10.2018 ( Ext.-W/4 ) by which all 37 workmen raised
their dispute before the ALC (C) Pakur. The demand letter dt-23.10.2018 (Ext.-W/4 ) shows the aggrieved workmen
brought attention of ALC (C) Pakur they have appeared in the written examination on different posts as per
advertisement published in employment news in the year 2009, 2010 wherein the salary slabs of different post was
also shown in the two advertisements and they were given appointment letters with the endorsement salary under
revision and they will get it on confirmation but after confirmation all the workmen did neither received salary as per
the advertisement nor they have been provided any kind of allowances. They also raised issue even after working of
eight years in the management company, workmen neither got any promotion nor any bonus however, they used to
make communication with the management by making complaint but nothing is done by the management. On this
issue, the management sides argued that the demand letter of dt- 23.10.2018 does not disclose the real issue as the
workmen side raised in their statement of claim but on close scrutiny of the demand notice of dt- 23.10.2018
(Ext.-W/4), it is evident that the workmen has raised their grievances for not getting the salary as per advertisements
of 2009 and 2010 ( Ext.W/1 & W/1-1 ) rather they have given appointment letters showing lesser salary with note
3810
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :SEPTEMBER 7, 2024/BHADRA 16, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
salary is under revision and they will be given after confirmation. So this tribunal does not find any force in the
contention of the management nothing is clear from the demand notice of dt-23.10.2018 ( Ext.-W/4 ). This tribunal
finds that out of 37 workmen two workmen Suraj Kumar (W.W-1 )& Vivek Kumar ( W.W-2 ) have fully supported
the claim of all workmen in their evidence about not getting the actual salary as per advertisement rather they have
been given lesser salary mentioned in the appointment letter ( Ext.-W/2 series ). Both the workmen also supported his
fact thatthe appointment letters of all the 37 workmen i.e( Ext.-W/2 series ) indicates regarding salary i.e lesser to the
salary slab given in the advertisement with note salary is under revision and revised salary will paid on confirmation
of service. Both the workmen also supported this fact that even after confirmation their salary is not revised as per
advertisement and they also did not get IDA and other allowances as per the advertisement. The advertisement Ext.-
W/1 that was published in the edition 21-27.11.2009 of employment news in which HPCL Biofuels is shown as
wholly owned subsidiary company of HPCL advertised for the six posts including data processor cum clerk in which
salary slab of data processor was 1.08 to 1.15 Lac. per year inclusive all. It is also shown in the advertisement ( Ext.-
W/1 ) besides basic pay candidates will also be paid IDA @ applicable rates and other allowances and benefits will be
admissible as per company rules in force from time to time. Advertisement of edition 21-27.08.2010 of employment
news advertised for the 46 posts shown the salary slab of different post and it is also mentioned in the said
advertisement besides basic pay candidates will also be paid IDA at the applicable rate. Other applicable allowances
and benefits will be admissible as per company rules in force from time to time. W.W-1 Suraj Kumar appointed DCS
Operator whose basic salary was fixed Rs. 3500/- per months as per salary slip and appointment letter. The salary slip
of Suraj Kumar of March-2011 produced by workmen side ( Ext.-W/7-1 ) shows that Suraj Kumar DCS operator
got basic salary Rs. 3500/- VDA Rs. 2930/-. But in the second column of the pay slip shows that head earning in
which Basic amount Rs. 3387.10, V.D.A- Rs. 2835.48Ps., F.A- 171.29Ps., Interim Relief- Rs. 338.71Ps., Medical
Allowance- Rs. 87.10Ps., H.R.A- Rs. 338.71Ps, total amount of Rs. 7158.30Ps, and pay slip also shows deductions of
Rs. 747.00Ps thus Suraj Kumar received net salary Rs. 6411.30Ps this pay slip shows that in the March-2011 Suraj
Kumar ( W.W-1 ) was receiving fixed allowance interim M.A & H.R.A but later on only basic V.D.A & F.A was
being paid by the company to the workman Suraj Kumar (W.W-1) that is evident from his pay slip for the months of
January-2022 showing Basic Rs. 12622.00, V.D.A- Rs. 8168.35, and in second column under of earning basic Rs.
10993.35, V.D.A- Rs. 7114.37, and F.A- Rs. 47.90, and after deduction of P.F- Rs.2173.00 net salary was given to
Suraj Kumar Rs. 15,982.62. The issue raised by the workmen side after few month’s of their appointment, they were
not getting M.A & H.R.A is established by salary slip of January-2022 filed by the Suraj Kumar ( Ext.- W/7-2 ). As
per the pay slip of March-2011 of workman Suraj Kumar ( Ext.-W/7-1) he was getting 83.71% of the basic salary as
V.D.A however, as per pay slip of January-2022 (Ext.-W/7-2 ) Suraj Kumar was getting V.D.A 64.71% of the basic it
shows that D.A is slashed, however V.D.A relates to the price index, why % of V.D.A to the basic went down, it is
not reported by the management i.e a matter of great concern and it is related to the demand notice given by the
workmen side. Witness Vivek Kumar W.W-2 also filed his two pay slips one of March-2011 ( Ext.-W/7 ) and second
pay slip of January-2022 ( Ext.- W/7-3). Pay slip of March-2011 shows that Vivek Kumar was getting basic Rs.
3650.00 and V.D.A- Rs. 2930.00, but in the second column of pay slip under earning head his basic shown Rs.
3650.00, and V.D.A- Rs. 2930.00, F.A- Rs. 55.00, interim relief- Rs.350.00, M.A- Rs. 40.00, H.R.A- Rs.365.00.As
per pay slip Vivek Kumar ( W.W-2 ) was getting V.D.A- 80.27% to his basic and 10% H.R.A to his basic but he
received M.A only Rs. 40.00, however, Suraj Kumar whose basic was lesser than Vivek Kumar but he received M.A
Rs. 87.10Ps. this anomaly in fixing M.A does not look sound and concrete, why the lesser basic paid worker was
given more medical allowanceto the higher basic paid worker these discrepancy in paying different M.A to different
grade workers is also not reported by the managementto this tribunal. This also supported the grievance raised by the
workmen regarding medical and other allowance and V.D.A. Workman Vivek Kumar has applied for the post of Data
Processor cum Clerk as per the advertisement published in the edition 27.11.2009 of employment news as per
advertisement salary slab was shown 1.08 to 1.15 Lacs per annum, like wise Suraj Kumar W.W-1 who applied for the
post of DCS operator as per advertisement of 21-27.08.2010 in employment news and as per advertisement the salary
slab of DCS operator is 1.08 to 1.25 P.A meaning their by Suraj Kumar ( W.W-1 ) must be receiving salary not less
then Rs. 9,000/- P.M in the year-2011 but he was given Rs. 7158.30Ps. and after deduction of P.F Rs. 747.00 he
received Rs. 6611.00 and this amount is exclusive of V.D.A, F.A, interim relief, M.A, and H.R.A i.e the clear cut
discrepancy in the salary slip given by the management against the salary slab shown in the advertisement besides its
I.D.A and other allowance should be pay as per rules from time to time is also mentioned in the two advertisement
Ext.-W/1 & W/1-1. Suraj Kumar ( W.W-1 ) has proved the appointment letters of all the 37 workmen including him
as Ext.-W/2 series of perusal of the appointment letters of all the 37 workmen.It appears that workman, Suraj Kumar,
Vijendra Pratap Narayan Singh and one Mr. Kumar were appointed on the post of DCS operator they applied for the
said post on the basis of advertisement published in the employment news edition 21-27.08.2010 ( Ext.-W/1-1 ). As
per advertisement their salary slab is from 1.08 to 1.25 Lacs P.A it shows their basic salary should be Rs. 9,000/- P.M
at the time of appointment, moreover, as per advertisement in serial no.-7 shows besides basic pay candidates also be
paid I.D.A at the applicable rates and other allowances and benefits will be admissible as per company rules from
time to time.This tribunal further finds that workman Vikash Kumar, Keshav Kumar, Vijay Kumar Mishra, Mirinal
Kumar Srivastava, Imran Khan are appointed to the post of Area Cane Supervisor their basic pay Rs. 3800/- P.M is
shown in their respective appointment letters ( Ext.-W/2 Series ) however as per advertisement details salary slab is
1.08 to 1.25 Lacs P.A meaning there by initial basic should be Rs. 9000/- P.M besides I.D.A and other allowances
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 7, 2024/भाद्र 16, 1946
3811
like H.R.A, M.A. Out of them Vikash Kumar filed his pay slips i.e( Ext.-W/3-1) of July, October, December of year-
2018 in which only basic and VDA, Mob. Allowance and Bike Allowance are shown. He also filed pay slips of the
month of January, April and July of 2019 where basic pay is shown as Rs. 12411/- and VDA Rs. 5649/- but he was
not given the actual VDA as per notification regarding D.A filed by the workmen side is ( Ext.-W/5 ).As per office
memorandum regarding payment of D.A to the employee is,whose basic pay above Rs. 9500/- he should get
minimum Rs. 28,234/- from 01.01.2018 i.e not paid to the workmen Vikash Kumar and others who are appointed on
the same post as Area Cane Supervisor. This tribunal further finds that workmen Ritesh Kumar Jha, Saket Pandey,
Rakesh Kumar Yadav, Kamleshwar Prasad and Brindabon Pramanick have been appointed to the post of Kamdar
after getting selection in the examination from the said advertisement ( Ext.-W/1-1 ). Their appointment letter
(Ext.-W/2 series) shows that they have been given basic Rs. 3500/- at the time of joining however as per
advertisement, basic pay should be given Rs. 8000/- P.M as per salary slab given in advertisement (Ext.-W/1-1).Their
appointment letter also show with endorsement pay under revision salary will be enhanced after confirmation. This
tribunal further finds that workmen namely Ashok Kumar Pawan Paswan, Ramprit Prajapati have been appointed to
the post of electrician against the advertisement published in the employment news 21-27.10.2010 ( Ext.-W/1-1 ) their
basic salary is shown as Rs. 3800/- has shown appointment letter ( Ext.-W/2 series ) in which salary slab is shown
1.08 to 1.25 Lacs P.A meaning there by salary should be Rs. 9000/- P.M at time of joining but even after endorsement
in appointment letters“pay under revision revised salary will be paid on confirmation of service” but it is not followed
by the company i.e main demand of the workmen in their demand notice ( Ext.-W/4 ). Workman Ashok Kumar
Paswan has filed his pay slip of the month of March, April, May, June July, August of 2019 ( Ext.-W/3-12 ) in which
his basic salary is Rs. 12,411/-, VDA- Rs.5219/-.Pay slip shows that basic is enhanced to the initially given Rs. 3800/-
at the time of issuing appointment letter but other allowances like HRA, M.A is not given to the workmen.Moreover
as per the office memorandum regarding D.A ( IDA ) filed by the workmen ( Ext.-W/5 series ) in which office
memorandum of dt- 03.01.2019 shows that whose basic is above Rs. 9500/- should be given minimum D.A Rs.
30,011/- from 01.01.2019 but this is not paid to the workmen who is appointed to the post of electrician. This tribunal
further finds that workman Sujit Kumar Singh, Dhanraj Kumar and Naresh Kumar are appointed to the post of Lab.
Attendant / Peon against the advertisement published in the edition of 21-27.10.2010 of the employment news ( Ext.-
W/1-1 ), their appointment letters show that they have been given initial basic Rs. 3500/- P.M with a endorsement
basic pay is under revision, revised pay shall be given on confirmation but even after confirmation they did not get
basic and D.A according to the advertisement that should be Rs. 9000/- P.M basic upon confirmation of the service
besides this Lab. Attendant / Peon should be given HRA and M.A and D.A ( IDA ) as per the enhancement of D.A
shown in the office memorandum filed by the workman as ( Ext.- W/5 ). This tribunal further finds that workman
namely Niraj Kumar and Pankaj Kumar Keshri have been appointed to the post of Weight Bridge Operator against the
advertisement ( Ext.-W/1-1 ).Their appointment letter show that they have given basic Rs. 3500/- P.M with
endorsement pay under revision, revised salary shall be given on confirmation. As per advertisement their salary slab
is 0.96 to 1.08 Lacs P.A meaning there by workman to the post of Weight Bridge Operator should be given Rs. 8000/-
P.M basic upon confirmation besides basic, D.A ( IDA ) other allowance like HRA and M.A but they did not get D.A
and other allowances. Workman Niraj Kumar and Pankaj Kumar Keshri have filed their pay slip too. Pay slip for the
month of August-2019 filed by Pankaj Kumar Keshri ( Ext.-W/3-18 ) shows he received basic Rs. 11990/-, VDA Rs.-
5649.50 and F.A 177.00. As per pay slip basic salary has been enhanced to the initial posting that was Rs. 3500/- but
VDA is not given as per office memorandum filed by the workmen side (Ext.-W/5 ) that is issued on 19.01.2019 as
per that office memorandum the employee whose basic pay is above the Rs. 9500/- should be given minimum D.A
Rs. 30,011/- the same figure is shown in the pay slip of Niraj Kumar that is Ext.- W/3-19. This tribunal further finds
that workman namely Niraj Kumar and Sonu Kumar Paswan have been appointed on the post of Welders who have
been given basic Rs. 3650 P.M as per their appointmentletters ( Ext.-W/2 series ) but as per the advertisement ( Ext.-
W/1-1) their salary slab is 1.08 to 1.25 Lacs P.A meaning there by they should get Rs. 9000/- P.M basic upon
confirmation besides basic workman to the post of Welders should also get VDA ( IDA ), HRA and M.A and F.A that
was initially given by the company to the workmen but these workmen also did not get D.A according to the
enhanced basic i.e shown in the office memorandum documents filed by the workman as ( Ext.-W/5 ). Niraj Tiwary
have filed his pay slip of the month of March, April, May, June, July, August of the year-2019 as ( Ext.-W/3-8 ) pay
slip of August-2019 shows he received, basic Rs. 12,228/- VDA Rs. 6549 and F.A Rs. 42.58, salary slip also shows
his basic salary has been enhanced from the initial posting but the VDA i.e ( IDA ) is not given according to the office
memorandum issue by the Govt. of India, Department of Ministry of Heavy Industries & Public Enterprises,
Department of Public Enterprises from time to time i.e ( Ext.-W/5 ). This is the discrepancy in the salary of the
workmen as of the details above. This tribunal further finds that workmen namely Navin Kumar Mishra, Satyendra
Pd. Kushwaha, Ramesh Kumar Singh and Chandan Kumar have been appointed to the post of financial clerk,
purchase clerk W.H / Clerk respectively and they have been given Rs. 3650/- basic P.M as per appointment letters
(Ext.-W/2 Series) however, as per the advertisement their salary slab is 1.14 to 1.25 Lacs P.A meaning there by they
should get Rs. 9500/- P.M basic after the probation with increment of each year and D.A ( IDA ) to the enhanced
basic till date and they should also get M.A, HRA too but company did not provide revised pay and other allowances
as per letter of demand filed by the workman side i.e ( Ext.-W/4 ). This tribunal further finds that workman Amit
Kumar Tiwari has been appointed to the post of Instrumentation Mechanic whose basic salary Rs. 3800/- basic salary
is shown in his appointment letter ( Ext.-W/2 Series ) however, as per advertisement the salary slab of Instrumentation
3812
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :SEPTEMBER 7, 2024/BHADRA 16, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Mechanic is 1.05 to 1.25 Lacs P.A but he was also not received the revised VDA and HRA, M.A like other workmen.
This tribunal further finds that workman namely Shiv Prasad Mohanty and Chandra Kishore Baitha has been
appointed to the post of fitters whose basic salary was shown Rs. 3650/- in the their appointment letters ( Ext.- W/2
Series) but as per advertisement their salary slab is 1.08 1.25 Lacs P.A but they also did not get revised VDA against
revised basic and other allowance like M.A and HRA. This tribunal further find that workman Chandra Kishore
Baitha filed his pay slip of the month of March to August-2019 ( Ext.- W/3-15 ) pay slip of August-2019 shows that
he received basic salary Rs. 12,228/- VDA- Rs. 5649.15 and F.A 55.00.This salary slip shows that his basic is
enhanced to the initial basic salary of the year-2011 but he did not get the proportionate VDA( IDA ) as per office
memorandum regarding D.A filed by the workman as ( Ext.- W/5 ). This tribunal further finds that workman Dipu
Kumar Srivastava and Sunil Kumar have been appointed to the post of Attendant ( Motor / Tube Well Attendant )and
they have given basic Rs. 3500/- P.M in their appointment letter ( Ext.-W/2 series ) with an endorsement pay under
revision, revised salary will be paid upon confirmation. As per advertisement ( Ext.-W/1-1 ) their salary slab is from
1.08 to 1.25 Lacs, per annum meaning there-by they should get Rs. 9000/- basic upon confirmation of the services
besides it, they should get proportionate D.A ( IDA ) to the enhanced basic till date and they should also get M.A and
HRA but company did not provide salary accordingly. Workman Sunil Kumar have filed pay slip of the month of
March, August of year-2019 ( Ext.-W/3-16 ) his pay slip August-2019 shows he received Rs. 11,990/- VDA Rs.
5649.15, and FA Rs. 131.32. Pay slip also shows that he received enhanced basic to the initial basic of the 2011 but
he did not get M.A, HRA and D.A according to the office memorandum issued by department of Public Enterprises,
Govt. of India letter dt- 03.01.2019 ( Ext.- W/5 series ) according to the that memorandum the employee whose basic
is above Rs. 9500/- should get minimum Rs. 3,00,11/- as D.A ( IDA ). This tribunal further finds that workman
namely Rajesh Baitha and Neeraj Kumar Ray have been appointed to the post of Bagasse Carrier Attendant ( Feed
Pump Attendant ) they have given Rs. 3500/- basic through their appointment letters ( Ext.-W/2 Series ). Workman
Rajesh Baitha have filed his pay slip of the month of March to August-2019 ( Ext.- W/3-13 ) as per pay slip of August
2019 he received Rs. 11990/- basic and VDA Rs. 5649.15 and FA Rs. 177.00 certainly his basic has been enhanced
from his basic salary at the time of appointment but he did not received proportionate D.A ( VDA ) as per office
memorandum of dt- 03.01.2019 ( Ext. W/5 Series ) and company also did not give MA and HRA as per letters of
demand ( Ext.- W/4 ) this tribunal further finds that one workman namely Sharan Piyush has been appointed to the
post of Ware House Staff / Helpers and he has given Rs. 3500/- basic through his appointment letters ( Ext.-W/2
Series ) as per advertisement the salary slab of Ware House Staff / Helpers is 1,05 to 1.25 Lacs P.A but this workman
also did not get the enhanced VDA after confirmation to the enhanced basic and also did not get MA and HRA. This
tribunal further finds that workman Suraj Kumar W.W-1 have proved the arrear chart regarding his basic as per
advertisement and regarding accrued VDA as per office memorandum issued of Govt. of India from time to time
department of Public Enterprises ( Ext.-W/5 ) this arrear chart of all the 37 workmen from the year January-2011 to
July 2019 of each workmen showing already drawn salary including basic, VDA, F.A, M.A and I.R till the months of
December-2012 only i.e Ext.-W/6 to W/6-36 Series ). There is no cross examination of this accrued arrear chart
furnished by the workman Suraj Kumar for all the workmen ( Ext.- W/6 to W/6-36 Series ) by the management side
and there is no cross-examination to the office notification issued by Govt. of India Department of Public Enterprises
regarding D.A ( IDA ) ( Ext.-W/5 Series ) from time to time by the management side. This tribunal further finds
that workmen Vivek Kumar (W.W-2) who was appointed as DCS Operator also supported the claim of all the 37
workmen regarding not paying the proportionate VDA ( IDA ) and other allowances, HRA in examination-in-chief he
also stated that as per advertisement ( Ext.-W/1-1 ) salary slab was 1.08 to 1.25 Lacs P.A but he was given Rs. 3500/-
Basic at the time of issuance appointment letter however, it should be Rs. 9000/- P.M Basic. This witness also
supported that the company has issued appointment letters with an endorsement pay under revision and that will
revised after confirmation. He also supported the version of Suraj Kumar ( W.W-1 ) regarding the letter of demand (
Ext.-W/4 ) salary and allowance not given by the management. This witness also proved the applications filed by all
the 37 workmen putting their signature to CEO, HPCL in the year 2016, 2017 and 2018 regarding giving
proportionate IDA and other allowances i.e marked Ext.- W/8 to W/8-1, and W/8-2 respectively. In cross-examination
this witness categorically stated that their grievances isrelated to the salary and IDA besides the allowances like HRA
and M.A. This witness also admitted in cross-examination salary enhanced but it is not enhanced to the actual
proportion that ought to be given by the management. This witness has been cross-examined at length but
management side failed to discard his testimony regarding the dispute as raised by the workmen in their letter of
demand.
16. This tribunal further finds that M.W-1 stated that the salary of non management, workmen are as per direction of
the Sugar Wage Board and other allowances is also fixed by notification of Sugar Wage Board but in the
advertisement Ext.-W/1 & W/1-1 this is no where mentioned that salary slab of workmen shall be governed with the
notification of Sugar Wage Board. Moreover, appointment letters issued to the workmen i.e Ext.-W/2 also does not
show the salary and allowances shall be given as per the notification of Sugar Wages Board are appointment letter is
issued by HPCL Biofuels showing a wholly owned subsidiary company of HPCL and this is also admitted by the
M.W-1 in para-31 of the cross-examination and M.W-1 also admits that HPCL is the controlling company of HBL.
Document Ext.-M/1 of the management shows the financial report of HPCL Biofuels of the year 2019-20 and
2020-21. This documents simply financials report as issued of director to share holders i.e not related to the letter of
demand of the workmen for which the reference is sent to this tribunal, moreover, this documents also does not show
[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािृत्र : जसतम् बर 7, 2024/भाद्र 16, 1946
3813
the name of HPCL Biofuels Ltd. Ext.-M/2 the process follow diagram of HPCL Lauraya units i.e not related to the
dispute raised by the workmen by way of letter of demand ( Ext.- W/4 ). Ext.-M/3 is the GPA unnamed policy
schedule showing insured’s name has HPCL Biofuels Ltd. for the coverage of 1050 employees i.e the effective from
15.01.2022 to 14.01.2023 this documents has no meaning to this reference because this reference case is of the year
2019 and dispute raised by the workmen on 23.10.2018 ( Ext.-W/4 ) for not getting proportionate basic and
allowances as per advertisement. Ext.-M/4 is the letter dt-20.04.2016 issued by CEO of HPCL Biofuels Ltd and the
same is sent to Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum Natural Gas regarding complaint of the with workmen in which it is
mentioned the CEO has already apprised to the permanent employees of their complaint dt- 25.09.2015 vide reply
letter dt- 19.01.2016 and it is also mentioned salary structure of permanent employee is paid according to the Sugar
Wage Board notification but copy of the reply of 19.01.2016 is not produced by the management sides so this
documents is not complete documents i.e wanted to be shown by the management side. Management has filed HR
Policy of HPCL Biofuels Ltd has Ext.-M/5 but this documents does not show when this HR policy came into force i.e
also admitted by M.W-2 in para-33 of the cross-examination. This tribunal further find that M.W-1 deposed of the
workmen are native of the places where the company is situated they have own house and accommodation so do not
require any HRA. This is very absurd evidence given by M.W-1 because company or any institution gives
employment to the workmen through proper advertisement followed by written examination, interview and medical
that was not exclusively for the local residents moreover, HRA is right of permanent employee but the reason has
shown by M.W-1 for not requirement HRA has not acceptable at all. This tribunal further finds that M.W-3 has prove
the appointment letter of Suraj Kumar the workman ( W.W-1 ) issued on 31.12.2010 as Ext.-M/6 and he also filed
order of the Hon’ble High Court Madras of dt- 28.02.2011 has Ext.-M/7 but this witness does not disclosed what is
the relevance of this order to this reference case. This witness categorically stated in para-25 of the cross-examination
the appointment letter of Suraj Kumar Ext.-M/6 is issued according to the salary description of advertisement but on
scrutinizing the salary description has shown in advertisement Ext.-W/1 & W/1-1 it is not mentioned in the
appointment letter ( Ext.- W/2 ).
17. On the scrutinizing all the facts as placed by the rival parties and as well as their argument, this tribunal finds that
management side has stressed that the workmen claims is not is an Industrial Dispute because on which basis they are
claiming their pay fixation and other allowances (Advertisement Ext.-W/1 & W/1-1) because at the time of
advertisement the company was not in existence but this contention is not at all acceptable because the basis of this
reference is the letter of demand (Ext.-W/4) however, workmen whose issues are involved as discussed above are
definitionally got their appointment on different posts after applying on different posts vide the two published
advertisement where it is clearly mentioned that the HPCL Biofuels Ltd. invited the applications for different posts as
the commercial production of the company is scheduled from November 2010. This tribunal further finds that
management also stressed when the company issued appointment letters (Ext.-W/2 Series) to the workmen
mentioning all the terms and conditions and when they accepted the appointment letters, so their grievances of revised
pay and allowances does not stand on the basis of two advertisement. This plea of management side is also not
acceptable because in appointment letters ( Ext.-W/2 Series ) basic salary is shown lesser to the salary slab given in
the advertisement but at the same time it is mentioned in the appointment letters pay is under revision, revised shall be
paid on confirmation. This is the clear cut indication that when the workmen will be confirmed they will get revised
pay that includes basic pay, D.A ( IDA ), HRA, M.A and fixed allowance ( FA ) that is Misc. allowances applicable to
the posts but management side did not pay attention to the grievances raised by the workmen from time to time for
their revised pay, IDA and other allowances. This tribunal further finds that management side stressed on this point
that HPCL Biofuels Ltd. obviously a wholly owned company but the payment of salary of all categories of employees
is governed with the sugar wage board but it is neither mentioned in the details of two advertisement ( Ext.-W/1 &
W/1-1 ) on which basis the workmen applied on the different posts taking into notice of the salary slabs given in the
two advertisement nor it is shown in the appointment letters of the workmen ( Ext.-W/2 Series ). Moreover, this is the
clear fact that the two sick sugar units of Lauraya and Sugauli was taken by HPCL for the commercial production of
Ethanol integrated sugar and power generation and it is incorporated HPCL Biofuels Ltd. the sister concern of HPCL
i.e duly admitted by the management witness in their evidence and also admits HPCL Biofuels Ltd. does not come
under sugar industry. This tribunal finds and hold that management side did not not come up with clean hands while
advertised the different posts ( Ext.-W/1 & W/1-1 ) and they never apprised the workmen in the appointment letters
too. This tribunal further finds that management side also stressed on this point that the dispute of the workmen is of
2011 when they got appointment but they raised their dispute for the first time before the ALC (C) Pakur on
23.10.2018 (Ext.-W/4) i.e stale claim but this tribunal also does not accept this plea of the management because
workmen side right from very beginning raised their issues before CEO of the management company after completion
of probation period i.e evident from the complaint / representation petition filed in the year-2014, 2015 and 2016 that
is evident from Ext.- W/1, W/8-1, W/8-2. Moreover, workmen raised their grievance before the Hon’ble Court but it
was advised to take back to exhaust their issues in the appropriate forum then workmen raised their issues before the
ALC (C) Pakur through demand letter dt-23.10.2018 (Ext.-W/4). So their dispute is not stale claim, it does not come
under the purview of stale claim. This tribunal also finds that it is mentioned in the written statement by the
management side due to inadvertence and typographical error words CTC was inserted in the salary slab column of
the advertisement but management side failed to bring any authentic and concrete evidence before this tribunal that
3814
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :SEPTEMBER 7, 2024/BHADRA 16, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
any corrigendum or any notice was ever issued in this regards. So this is a kind of sweeping plea taken by the
management just to save itself. This tribunal further finds that the salary slip of workmen Suraj Kumar (W.W-1) and
Vivek Kumar ( W.W-2 ) of the year 2011 clearly show that they were getting basic not at per advertisements salary
slabs but they received VDA, MA, HRA and FA. The salary slip issued by the management company was definitely
is not in consonance of salary slab given in advertisement but it also indicates that they were getting VDA in place of
IDA that was mentioned in the advertisement besides HRA, M.A and F.A but their salary slip of the year 2022 shows
that both the workmen received only basic pay, VDA, and FA this is also variable without disclosing as the details of
F.A vide Ext.-W/7-2 & W/7-3. Here company ought to pay to the workmen VDA (IDA) proportionately to the
revised basic as per notification of Govt. of India regarding D.A (Ext.-W/5) and M.A, HRA and F.A too
proportionately to the revised basic but management company, why did not give the proportionate IDA, and M.A,
HRA and F.A is never discussed to the workmen and no authentic concrete evidence brought by the management in
this regards before this tribunal too. This tribunal further finds that workmen side has filed the notification regarding
the D.A issue by Central Govt. for public enterprises (Ext.-W/5) from time to time in which they have given the office
memorandum of d- 07.01.2014 in which D.A the basic salary up to Rs. 3500/- is minimum Rs. 8790/- and basic above
Rs. 9500/- the D.A is minimum Rs. 22,791/- like wise office notification d- 04.07.2017 shows that D.A is Rs.
10,432/- whose basic pay up to Rs. 3500/- and D.A Rs. 27056/- to the basic pay above Rs. 9500/-. They have also
filed a office memorandum of department of public enterprises regarding D.A of d- 04.07.2019 where D.A is set
minimum Rs. 12034/- to the basic pay up to Rs. 3500/- and D.A Rs. 31,208/- for basic pay above Rs. 9500/-. This
document Ext.-W/5 is issued from the Government of India, Ministry of Heavy Industries / Public Enterprises but as
per the notification the workmen never received ( I.D.A ) that ought to be given by the company in respect of their
basic pay and this is the demand of the workmen i.e justified. This tribunal further finds and hold that after careful
scrutiny of all the documents placed by the workmen side and management side as well, management did not make
payment to the workmen according to salary slab mentioned in the advertisement after the confirmation of the
services of the workmen and management also did not gave actual VDA in place of IDA to their proportionate basic
and HRA, M.A, and F.A ( Misc. allowance ) applicable to the posts that was given initially by the management
company but later on management withdrew the allowances like HRA and M.A i.e the right of the every workmen
discharging duties in the management company.
18. Thus on scrutinizing of the facts and materials available on the record as discussed above, this tribunal finds and
hold that workmen side has successfully established their claim as per letter of demand (Ext.-W/4) and thus workmen
are entitled for revised basic pay as per salary slabs given in the advertisement on which basis they have been
appointed by the company beside this all the 37 workmen whose details as given in para-14 are also entitled revised
basic pay, as per terms of advertisement, VDA (IDA) proportionately to their basic pay as per (Ext.-W/5) the
notification issued by the Govt. of India from time to time for the employees working in public enterprises in the
different basic slabs grade. Workmen are also entitled to proportionate HRA, to their basic pay and M.A and F.A
(Misc. allowance) too. Moreover, workmen are also entitled the benefits of E.S.I as they are permanent employees of
HPCL Biofuels Ltd., the sister concern of HPCL, a public enterprises company has they are getting salary in each
month of a calendar year. So it can’t be said, the workmen are seasonal employee. Thus on the basis of above findings
it is the considered opinion of this tribunal that the demand letter dt-23.10.2018 ( Ext.-W/4 ) given by the workmen
Suraj Kumar & 36 others (named above in para-14) of HPCL Biofuels Ltd. about their pay revision and payment of
different allowance are proper, legal and justified. Accordingly management company is directed to scrutinize the
chart of accrued arrears of pay and allowances given by the workmen through Ext.-W/6 Series, taking into notice of
issued pay slips to the workmen of different salary slabs (Ext.-W/3 Series) and notification of Govt. of India, Ministry
of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises regarding D.A (IDA) Ext.-W/5 and make payment accordingly to each
workmen to his entitlement from their confirmation dates as per above findings of this tribunal within three month’s
from the of publication of this award. This award is effected after date of publication in gazette.
This is my award accordingly.
Dictated & Corrected by me.
MANOJ SHANKAR, Presiding Officer
Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064
and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054. SARVESH KUMAR
SRIVASTAVA
Digitally signed by SARVESH KUMAR
SRIVASTAVA
Date: 2024.09.11 21:22:44 +05'30'