7772 GI/2024

(5209)

रजिस्ट्री सं. डी.एल. (एन) 04/0007/2003—05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

xxxGIDHxxx

xxxGIDExxx

प्राजिकार से प्रकाजित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप् ताजिक

WEEKLY

सं. 49]

नई दिल् ली, दिसम् बर 8—दिसम् बर 14, 2024, िजनवार/ अग्रिायण 17—अग्रिायण 23, 1946

No. 49]

NEW DELHI, DECEMBER 8—DECEMBER 14, 2024, SATURDAY/ AGRAHAYANA 17–AGRAHAYANA 23, 1946

इस भाग में जभन् न पृष् ठ संख् या िी िाती िै जिससे दक यि पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा िा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II—खण् ड 3—उप-खण् ड (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों (रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर) द्वारा िारी दकए गए सांजवजिक आिेि और अजिसूचनाएं

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

कार्मिक, लोक जिकायत तथा पेंिन मंत्रालय

(कार्मिक और प्रजिक्षण जवभाग)

नई दिल्ली, 8 दिसम् बर, 2023

का.आ. 2204.—केंद्रीय सरकार, िंड प्रदिया संजिता, 1973 (1974 का 2) की िारा 24 की उपिारा (8) द्वारा

प्रित्त िज‍ तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए, श्री. िेवेंद्र पाल ससंि, अजिवक्ता को, सीबीआई जविेष न्यायािीि न्यायालय राउस

एवेन्यू नई दिल्ली और नई दिल्ली में अपील, पुनरीक्षण या दकसी अपील या पुनरीक्षण न्यायालय के समक्ष इस मामले से

उद्भूत अन्य मामलों में जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापना (केन्द्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो) द्वारा संजस्ट्थत सीबीआई मामला आरसी सं. 218

2021 ए 0005/एसी-III (अजभषेक जतवारी मामला) के अजभयोिन का संचालन करने के जलए प्रभार ग्रिण करने की

तारीख से तीन वषि की अवजि के जलए और मामले का जनपटान िोने तक इनमें से िो भी पिले िो, जविेष लोक अजभयोिक

के रूप में जनयुक्त करती िै ।

[फाा. सं. 225/48/2022-एवीडी-II]

रािीव कुमार खरे, अवर सजचव

सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-19122024-259514

CG-DL-W-19122024-259514

5210

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 14, 2024/AGRAYANA 23, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department of Personnel And Training)

New Delhi, the 8th Deceember, 2023

S.O. 2204.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Davinder Pal Singh, Advocate, as Special

Public Prosecutor for conducting prosecution of CBI case RC No. 218 2021 A0005/AC-III (Abhishek Tiwari Case),

instituted by the Delhi Special Police Establishment (Central Bureau of Investigation), in the Court of Special Judge

CBI, Rouse Avenue Court, New Delhi, and appeals, revisions or other matters arising out of this case before any

appellate or revisional Court at New Delhi for a period of three years from the date of assumption of charge or till

disposal of the case, whichever is earlier

[F. No. 225/48/2022-AVD-II]

RAJEEV KUMAR KHARE, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 8 दिसम् बर, 2023

का.आ. 2205.—केंद्रीय सरकार, िंड प्रदिया संजिता, 1973 (1974 का 2) की िारा 24 की उपिारा (8) द्वारा

प्रित्त िज‍ तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए, श्री पी. प्रसन्ना कुमार, अजिवक्ता को दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापन (केंद्रीय अन्वेषण

ब्यूरो) द्वारा संजस्ट्थत मामलों, जिन्िें नीचे िी गई सारणी के स्ट्तंभ (2) और स्ट्तंभ (3) में वर्णित दकया गया िै, का अजभयोिन

संचाजलत करने या दकसी अपील या पुनरीक्षण न्यायालय, जिसे तत्समय प्रवृत्त जवजि द्वारा अपील या पुनरीक्षण न्यायालय

के रूप में स्ट्थाजपत दकया गया िै, में ऐसे मामलों से उद्भूत िोने वाली कोई अपील, पुनरीक्षण या अन्य मामलों को

संचाजलत करने के जलए प्रभार ग्रिण करने की तारीख से तीन वषि की अवजि के जलए या मामलों के जनपटान की तारीख

तक, इनमें से िो भी पिले िो, जविेष लोक अजभयोिक जनयुक्त करती िै ।

िम सं.

आरसी सं.

न्यायालय

मामला सं.

न्यायालय का नाम

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

आरसी 14(ए)/2019

1055/2019

81वां अपर नगर जसजवल और सत्र न्यायािीि, बंगलोर

आरसी 15(ए)/2019

629/2021

सीबीआई मामलों (सीसीएच-4) के जलए 21वां नगर जसजवल

और सत्र न्यायािीि तथा प्रिान जविेष न्यायािीि, न्यायालय

बंगलोर

आरसी 19(ए)/2019

786/2020

[फा. सं. 225/32/2022-एवीडी-II]

रािीव कुमार खरे, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 8th Deceember, 2023

S.O. 2205.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri P. Prasanna Kumar, Advocate, as Special

Public Prosecutor for conducting prosecution of cases instituted by the Delhi Special Police Establishment (Central

Bureau of Investigation) mentioned in column (2) and (3) in the table below and any appeal, revision or other matter

arising out of these cases in any appellate or revisional Court established by any law for the time being in force, for a

period of three years from the date of assumption of charge or till disposal of the cases, whichever is earlier: -

S. N.

(1)

RC No.

(2)

Court Case No.

(3)

Name of the Court

(4)

RC 14(A)/2019

1055/2019

81st Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore

RC 15(A)/2019

629/2021

XXI City Civil & Session Judge & Principal Special Judge

for CBI Cases (CCH-4) Court, Bangalore

RC 19(A)/2019

786/2020

[F. No. 225/32/2022-AVD-II]

RAJEEV KUMAR KHARE, Under Secy.

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 14, 2024/अग्रिायण 23, 1946

5211

नई दिल्ली, 8 दिसम् बर, 2023

का.आ. 2206.—केंद्रीय सरकार, िंड प्रदिया संजिता, 1973 (1974 का 2) की िारा 24 की उपिारा (8) द्वारा

प्रित्त िज‍ तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए, श्री िनाईनोबा उमािीराव िारडे और श्री आजिष जत्रम्बकराव िाघवार, अजिवक्ताओं

को दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापन (केंद्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो) द्वारा जिला न्यायािीि-2, अपर सत्र न्यायािीि, नांिेड़ के

न्यायालय में संजस्ट्थत सीबीआई मामला आरसीबीएस 2200780002 (नांिेड़ जवस्ट्फोट मामला) का अजभयोिन और इस

मामले से दकसी अपील या पुनरीक्षण न्यायालय, जिसे तत्समय प्रवृत्त जवजि द्वारा अपील या पुनरीक्षण न्यायालय के रूप में

स्ट्थाजपत दकया गया िै, में उद्भूत िोने वाली कोई अपील, पुनरीक्षण या अन्य मामलों को संचाजलत करने के जलए प्रभार

ग्रिण करने की तारीख से तीन वषि की अवजि के जलए या मामलों के जनपटान की तारीख तक, इनमें से िो भी पिले िो,

जविेष लोक अजभयोिक जनयुक्त करती िै ।

[फा. सं. 225/07/2023-एवीडी-II]

रािीव कुमार खरे, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 8th Deceember, 2023

S.O. 2206.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Dnyanoba Umajirao Darade and Shri

Aashish Trimbakrao Jadhavar Rao, Advocates as Special Public Prosecutors for conducting the prosecution of CBI

Case RCBS2200780002 (Nanded Blast Case) instituted by the Delhi Special Police Establishment (Central Bureau of

Investigation) in Court of District Judge-2 Additional Sessions Judge, Nanded and any appeal, revision or other

matters arising out of this case in any appellate or revisional court established court by any law for the time being in

force, for a period of three years from the date of assumption of charge or till disposal of cases, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 225/07/2023-AVD-II]

RAJEEV KUMAR KHARE, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 8 दिसम् बर, 2024

का.आ. 2207.—केंद्रीय सरकार, िंड प्रदिया संजिता, 1973 (1974 का 2) की िारा 24 की उपिारा (8) द्वारा प्रित्त

िज‍ तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए श्री जनजखल गोयल, अजिवक्ता को 63 मून्स टेक्नोलॉजिस जलजमटेड बनाम भारत संघ और अन्य

िीषि वाली 2023 की ररट याजचका सं. 158 में बम्बई उच्च न्यायालय के समक्ष दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापन (केंद्रीय

अन्वेषण ब्यूरो) की ओर से उपजस्ट्थत िोने के जलए 28 अगस्ट्त, 2023 से तीन वषि की अवजि के जलए या मामले के जनपटान

तक, इनमें से िो भी पूवित्तर िो, जविेष लोक अजभयोिक जनयुक्त करती िै ।

[फा.सं. 225/06/2023-एवीडी-II]

रािीव कुमार खरे, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 8th Deceember, 2023

S.O. 2207.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Nikhil Goel, Advocate, as Special Public

Prosecutor appearing on behalf of Delhi Special Police Establishment (Central Bureau of Investigation) in Writ

Petition Number 158 of 2023 titled 63 Moons Technologies Limited vs. Union of India and Ors. before the High

Court of Bombay, for a period of three years with effect from the 28^th August, 2023 or till disposal of case, whichever

is earlier.

[F. No. 225/06/2023-AVD-II]

RAJEEV KUMAR KHARE, Under Secy.

5212

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 14, 2024/AGRAYANA 23, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 19 दिसम् बर, 2023

का.आ. 2208.—केंद्रीय सरकार, िंड प्रदिया संजिता, 1973 (1974 का 2) की िारा 24 की उपिारा (8) द्वारा

प्रित्त िज‍ तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए, श्री ियाबालन, अजिवक्ता को, दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापन (केंद्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो)

द्वारा संजस्ट्थत मामलों, जिन्िें नीचे िी गई सारणी के स्ट्तंभ (2) और स्ट्तंभ (3) में वर्णित दकया गया िै, मिुरई के जवचारण

न्यायालय में और दकसी अपील, पुनरीक्षण या जवजि द्वारा स्ट्थाजपत दकसी अपील या पुनरीक्षण न्यायालय में इन मामलों से

उद्भूत िोने वाले अन्य मामलों के अजभयोिन का संचालन करने के जलए, प्रभार ग्रिण करने की तारीख से तीन वषि की

अवजि के जलए या मामलों के जनपटान की तारीख तक, इनमें से िो भी पिले िो, जविेष लोक अजभयोिक जनयुक्त

करती िै ।

िम

सं.

आरसी सं.

न्यायालय

मामला सं.

न्यायालय का नाम

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

आरसी 10(एस)/2010

सीसी 1/2012 जविेष न्यायािीि न्यायालय, मिुरई

आरसी एमए12012ए

0003

सीसी 13/13

जविेष न्यायािीि न्यायालय, मिुरई

आरसी 12(एस)/2014

सीसी 20/16

मजिला न्यायालय, मिुरई

आरसी एमए1212ए0014

सीसी 08/14

जविेष न्यायािीि न्यायालय, मिुरई

आरसी एमए12013ए0017

सीसी 07/14

जविेष न्यायािीि न्यायालय, मिुरई

आरसी एमए12002ए0052

सीसी 02/15

जविेष न्यायािीि न्यायालय, मिुरई

आरसी एमए12013ए0033

सीसी 01/15

मुख्य न्याजयक मैजिस्ट्रेट, मिुरई

आरसी एमए12011ए0029

सीसी 01/15

जविेष न्यायािीि न्यायालय, मिुरई

आरसी 05(एस)/13

सीसी 02/15

मुख्य न्याजयक मैजिस्ट्रेट, मिुरई

आरसी एमए12015ए0010

सीसी 03/16

जविेष न्यायािीि न्यायालय, मिुरई

आरसी एमए12015ए0015

सीसी 03/16

जविेष न्यायािीि न्यायालय, मिुरई

आरसी एमए12016ए0012

सीसी 02/17

जविेष न्यायािीि न्यायालय, मिुरई

आरसी एमए12015ए0007

सीसी 11/17

जविेष न्यायािीि न्यायालय, मिुरई

आरसी एमए12015ए0015

सीसी 01/18

जविेष न्यायािीि न्यायालय, मिुरई

आरसी एमए12015ए0015

एससी 52/16

सत्र न्यायालय, मिुरई

आरसी 02(एस)/12

(1) पीआरसी

01/17

(2) पीआरसी

336/22

मुख्य न्याजयक मैजिस्ट्रेट, मिुरई

(3) िेसी

43/22

दकिोर न्याय बोडि, मिुरई

आरसी 08(एस)/14

एससी

91/2016

I एडीिे, मिुरई

आरसी 02/(एस)/16

एससी

531/2019

V एडीिे, मिुरई

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 14, 2024/अग्रिायण 23, 1946

5213

आरसी 06(एस)/18

पीआरसी

82/2020

मुख्य न्याजयक मैजिस्ट्रेट, मिुरई

आरसी 08(एस)/18

आरसीएस

02/2022

मुख्य न्याजयक मैजिस्ट्रेट, मिुरई

[फा.सं. 225/34/2022-एवीडी-II]

कुंिन नाथ, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 19th Deceember, 2023

S.O. 2208.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri K. Jayabalan, Advocate as Special Public

Prosecutor for conducting prosecution of the cases mentioned in column (2) and (3) of the table below, instituted by

the Delhi Special Police Establishment (Central Bureau of Investigation) in the Trial Courts at Madurai and any

appeal, revision or other matters arising out of these cases in any appellate or revisional Court established by any law

for the time being force, for a period of three years from the date of assumption of charge or till disposal of the cases,

whichever is earlier: -

S. No.

(1)

RC No.

(2)

Court Cases No.

(3)

Name of Court

(4)

RC 10(S)/2010

CC 1/2012

Special Judge Court, Madurai

RC MA12012A0003

CC 13/13

Special Judge Court, Madurai

RC 12(S)/2014

CC 20/16

Mahila Court, Madurai

RC MA12012A0014

CC 08/14

Special Judge Court, Madurai

RC MA12013A0017

CC 07/14

Special Judge Court, Madurai

RC MA12002A0052

CC 02/15

Special Judge Court, Madurai

RC MA12013A0033

CC 01/15

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai

RC MA12011A0029

CC 01/15

Special Judge Court, Madurai

RC 05(S)/13

CC 02/15

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai

RC MA12015A0010

CC 01/16

Special Judge Court, Madurai

RC MA12015A0015

CC 03/16

Special Judge Court, Madurai

RC MA12016A0012

CC 02/17

Special Judge Court, Madurai

RC MA12015A0007

CC 11/17

Special Judge Court, Madurai

RC MA12015A0015

CC 01/18

Special Judge Court, Madurai

RC MA12014A0044

SC 52/16

Sessions Court, Madurai

RC 02(S)/12

(1) PRC 01/17

(2) PRC 336/22

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai

(3) JC 43/22

Juvenile Justice Board, Madurai

RC 08(S)/14

SC 91/2016

I ADJ, Madurai

RC 02(S)/16

SC 531/2019

V ADJ, Madurai

RC 06(S)/18

PRC 82/2020

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai

RC 08(S)/18

RCS 02/2022

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai

[F. No. 225/34/2022-AVD-II]

KUNDAN NATH, Under Secy.

5214

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 14, 2024/AGRAYANA 23, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 1 फरवरी, 2024

का.आ. 2209.— केंद्रीय सरकार, िंड प्रदिया संजिता, 1973 (1974 का 2) की िारा 24 की उपिारा (8) द्वारा

प्रित्त िजक्तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए, श्री श्रीजनवास कपाजतया और श्री टी. श्रुिन कुमार रेड्डी, अजिवक्ता को, दिल्ली जविेष

पुजलस स्ट्थापन (केंद्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो) द्वारा तेलंगाना उच्च न्यायालय, िैिराबाि के समक्ष संजस्ट्थत दकए गए मामलों का,

तत्समय प्रवृत्त जवजि द्वारा स्ट्थाजपत दकसी अपील या पुनरीक्षण न्यायालय में इन मामलों से उद्भूत दकसी अपील, पुनरीक्षण

या अन्य जवषयों में अजभयोिन का संचालन करने के जलए, उनकी जनयुजक्त से तीन वषि की अवजि के जलए या अगला आिेि

िोने तक, इनमें से िो भी पूवितर िो, जविेष लोक अजभयोिक जनयुक्त करती िै ।

[फा. सं. 225/04/2023-एवीडी- II]

कुंिन नाथ, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 1st February, 2024

S.O. 2209.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Srinivas Kapatia and Shri T. Srujan

Kumar Reddy, Advocates as Special Public Prosecutors for conducting the prosecution of the cases instituted by

the Delhi Special Police Establishment (Central Bureau of Investigation) before the Hon’ble High Court of

Telangana, Hyderabad and any appeal, revision or other matters arising out of these cases in any appellate or

revisional Court established by law for the time being in force, for a period of three years from the date of their

appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 225/04/2023-AVD-II]

KUNDAN NATH, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 7 फरवरी, 2024

का.आ. 2210.—िंड प्रदिया संजिता 1973 (1974 का 2) की िारा 24 की उपिारा (8) द्वारा प्रित्त िजक्तयों का

प्रयोग करते हुए श्री अरसवंि कुमार, अजिवक्ता को दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापना (सीबीआई) द्वारा संजस्ट्थत सीबीआई

मामला आरसी4(एस)/2001/एससीबी-I एससी-III/नई दिल्ली, िो दिल्ली, िो अपर जिला न्यायािीि –XVIII, पटना के

न्यायालय में लंजबत िै, का अजभयोिन का संचालन करने िेतु तथा जवजि द्वारा स्ट्थाजपत दकसी अपीलीय अथवा पुनरीजक्षत

न्यायालय में इन मामलों से उत्पन्न अपील, पुनरीक्षण और अथवा अन्य मामलों का संचालन करने के जलए उनके प्रभार ग्रिण

करने की तारीख से तीन वषि की अवजि के जलए या मामलों का जनपटान िोने तक, िो भी पिले िो, जविेष लोक अजभयोिक

जनयुक्त करती िै ।

[फा. सं. 225/15/2023-एवीडी-II]

कुंिन नाथ, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 7th February, 2024

S.O. 2210.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Arvind Kumar, Advocate as Special

Public Prosecutor for conducting the prosecution of CBI case RC 4(S)/2001/SCB-I/SC-III/New Delhi instituted by the

Delhi Special Police Establishment (Central Bureau of Investigation) pending before the Court of Additional Judge-

XVIII, Patna and any appeal, revision or other matter arising out of this case in any Appellate or Revisional Court

established by law, for a period of three years from the date of assumption of charge or till disposal of the case,

whichever is earlier.

[F. No.225/15/2023-AVD-II]

KUNDAN NATH, Under Secy.

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 14, 2024/अग्रिायण 23, 1946

5215

नई दिल्ली, 20 फरवरी, 2024

का.आ. 2211.—केंद्रीय सरकार, िंड प्रदिया संजिता, 1973 (1974 का 2) की िारा 24 की उपिारा (8) द्वारा

प्रित्त िज‍ तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए, श्री ब्रिेि िु‍ला, अजिवक्ता को दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापन (केंद्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो)

द्वारा संजस्ट्थत मामलों, जिन्िें नीचे िी गई सारणी के स्ट्तंभ (2) में वर्णित दकया गया िै, के उक्त सारणी के स्ट्तंभ (5) में वर्णित

न्यायालयों में अजभयोिन संचाजलत करने या दकसी अपील या पुनरीक्षण न्यायालय, जिसे तत्समय प्रवृत्त जवजि द्वारा अपील

या पुनरीक्षण न्यायालय के रूप में स्ट्थाजपत दकया गया िै, में ऐसे मामलों से उद्भूत िोने वाली कोई अपील, पुनरीक्षण या

अन्य मामलों को संचाजलत करने के जलए प्रभार ग्रिण करने की तारीख से तीन वषि की अवजि के जलए या मामलों के

जनपटान की तारीख तक, इनमें से िो भी पूवित्तर िो, जविेष लोक अजभयोिक जनयुक्त करती िै:

ि.

सं.

आरसी. सं.

िाखा का नाम

न्यायालय

मामला सं.

न्यायालय का नाम

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

आरसी 1202008ए0001

सीबीआई,

भ्रष्टाचार

जनवारण

िाखा,

गाजियाबाि

49/2011

जविेष न्यायािीि, सीबीआई, न्यायालय

सं. 01 गाजियाबाि

आरसी 1202011ए0004

सीबीआई,

भ्रष्टाचार

जनवारण

िाखा,

गाजियाबाि

21/2013

जविेष न्यायािीि (भ्रष्टाचार जनवारण

अजिजनयम), सीबीआई, गाजियाबाि

आरसी 1202019ए0004

सीबीआई,

भ्रष्टाचार

जनवारण

िाखा,

गाजियाबाि

05/2020

जविेष न्यायािीि (भ्रष्टाचार जनवारण

अजिजनयम), सीबीआई, गाजियाबाि

आरसी 1202010ए0010

सीबीआई,

भ्रष्टाचार

जनवारण

िाखा,

गाजियाबाि

06/2012

जविेष न्यायािीि (भ्रष्टाचार जनवारण

अजिजनयम), सीबीआई, गाजियाबाि

आरसी 1202010ए0010

सीबीआई,

भ्रष्टाचार

जनवारण

िाखा,

गाजियाबाि

07/2012

जविेष न्यायािीि (भ्रष्टाचार जनवारण

अजिजनयम), सीबीआई, गाजियाबाि

आरसी 1202010ए0010

सीबीआई,

भ्रष्टाचार

जनवारण

िाखा,

गाजियाबाि

09/2012

जविेष न्यायािीि (भ्रष्टाचार जनवारण

अजिजनयम), सीबीआई, गाजियाबाि

आरसी 1202010ए0010

सीबीआई, भ्रष्टाचार

जनवारण

िाखा,

गाजियाबाि

10/2012

जविेष न्यायािीि (भ्रष्टाचार जनवारण

अजिजनयम), सीबीआई, गाजियाबाि

आरसी 1202010ए0010

सीबीआई, भ्रष्टाचार

जनवारण

िाखा,

गाजियाबाि

12/2012

जविेष न्यायािीि (भ्रष्टाचार जनवारण

अजिजनयम), सीबीआई, गाजियाबाि

आरसी1202012ए0005

सीबीआई, भ्रष्टाचार

जनवारण

िाखा,

गाजियाबाि

03/2015

जविेष न्यायािीि, सीबीआई, न्यायालय

सं. 01 गाजियाबाि

आरसी 1202012ए0011

सीबीआई, भ्रष्टाचार

जनवारण

िाखा,

गाजियाबाि

02/2015

जविेष न्यायािीि, सीबीआई, न्यायालय

सं. 01 गाजियाबाि

[फा. सं. 225/34/2023-एवीडी-II]

कुंिन नाथ, अवर सजचव

5216

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 14, 2024/AGRAYANA 23, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 20th February, 2024

S.O. 2211.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Brajesh Shukla, Advocate as Special

Public Prosecutor for conducting the prosecution of cases instituted by the Delhi Special Police Establishment

(Central Bureau of Investigation) mentioned in column (2) the table below, in the courts mentioned in column (5) of

the said table and any appeal, revision or other matters arising out of these cases in any appellate or revisional Court

established by law, for a period of three years from the date of assumption of charge or till disposal of the cases,

whichever is earlier, namely:

S.N.

RC No.

Name of the Branch

Court Case

No.

Name of the Court

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

RC 1202008A0001

CBI, Anti-Corruption Branch,

Ghaziabad

49/2011

Special Judge, CBI, Court No.

01, Ghaziabad

RC 1202011A0004

CBI, Anti-Corruption Branch,

Ghaziabad

21/2013

Special Judge (PC Act), CBI,

Ghaziabad

RC 1202019A0004

CBI, Anti-Corruption Branch,

Ghaziabad

05/2020

Special Judge (PC Act), CBI,

Ghaziabad

RC 1202010A0010

CBI, Anti-Corruption Branch,

Ghaziabad

06/2012

Special Judge (PC Act), CBI,

Ghaziabad

RC 1202010A0010

CBI, Anti-Corruption Branch,

Ghaziabad

07/2012

Special Judge (PC Act), CBI,

Ghaziabad

RC 1202010A0010

CBI, Anti-Corruption Branch,

Ghaziabad

09/2012

Special Judge (PC Act), CBI,

Ghaziabad

RC 1202010A0010

CBI, Anti-Corruption Branch,

Ghaziabad

10/2012

Special Judge (PC Act), CBI,

Ghaziabad

RC 1202010A0010

CBI, Anti-Corruption Branch,

Ghaziabad

12/2012

Special Judge (PC Act), CBI,

Ghaziabad

RC 1202012A0005

CBI, Anti-Corruption Branch,

Ghaziabad

03/2015

Special Judge, CBI, Court No.

01, Ghaziabad

RC 1202012A0011

CBI, Anti-Corruption Branch,

Ghaziabad

02/2015

Special Judge, CBI, Court No.

01, Ghaziabad

[F. No. 225/34/2023-AVD-II]

KUNDAN NATH, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 10 अप्रैल, 2024

का.आ. 2212.—केन्द्रीय सरकार, िंड प्रदिया संजिता, 1973 (1974 का 2) की िारा 24 की उपिारा (8) द्वारा

प्रित् त िज‍ तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए, माननीय सेिन न्यायािीि के न्यायालय, यवतमाल, मिाराष्ट्र के समक्ष लंजबत दिल्ली

जविेष पुजलस स्ट् थापन (केंद्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो) द्वारा संजस्ट्थत सीबीआई मामले आरसी 1(एस)/2018/सीबीआई/एससीबी

मुंबई और आरसी 2(एस)/2018-सीबीआई/एससीबी/मुंबई (सेिन मामला सं. 173/2019) तथा जवजि द्वारा स्ट्थाजपत

दकसी अपील या पुनरीक्षण न्यायालय में इन मामलों से उद्भूत दकसी अपील, पुनरीक्षण और अन्य जवषय के अजभयोिन का

संचालन करने के जलए, श्री जविय लक्ष्मणराव कोल्िे, अजिवक्ता को जविेष लोक अजभयोिक के रूप में पिभार ग्रिण करने

की तारीख से तीन वषि की अवजि के जलए या मामलों के जनपटारे तक, िो भी पूवितर िो, जनयु‍ त करती िै।

[फा. सं. 225/04/2024-एवीडी-II]

कुंिन नाथ, अवर सजचव

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 14, 2024/अग्रिायण 23, 1946

5217

New Delhi, the 10th April, 2024

S.O. 2212.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Vijay Laxmanrao Kolhe, Advocate as

Special Public Prosecutor for conducting prosecution of CBI cases RC 1(S)/2018/CBI/SCB Mumbai and RC

2(S)/2018-CBI/SCB/Mumbai (Sessions Case No. 173/2019) instituted by Delhi Special Police Establishment (Central

Bureau of Investigation) pending before the Court of Hon’ble Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, Maharashtra and any appeal,

revision and other matter arising out of these cases in any appellate or revisional court established by law, for a period

of three years from the date of assumption of charge or till disposal of the cases, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 225/04/2024–AVD-II]

KUNDAN NATH, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 12 अप्रैल, 2024

का.आ. 2213.—केंद्रीय सरकार, िंड प्रदिया संजिता, 1973 (1974 का 2) की िारा 24 की उप-िारा (8) द्वारा

प्रित्त िजक्तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए, श्री रािेन्द्र जिवािी मिामने अजिवक्ता को दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापना (केंद्रीय

अन्वेषण ब्यूरो) द्वारा संस्ट्थाजपत मामलों, िैसा दक सारणी में ििािया गया िै, में अजभयोिन का संचालन करने और जवजि

द्वारा स्ट्थाजपत दकसी अपीलीय अथवा पुनरीक्षण न्यायालय में इन मामलों से उत्पन्न अपील, पुनरीक्षण अथवा अन्य मामलों

में अजभयोिन का संचालन करने के जलए उनके प्रभार ग्रिण करने की तारीख से तीन वषि की अवजि के जलए अथवा मामलों

के जनपटान िोने तक, िो भी पिले िो, जविेष लोक अजभयोिक जनयुक्त करती िै

सारणी

ि.सं.

आरसी सं.

न्यायालय मामला सं.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

आरसी.1/ई/2001/सीबीआई/ईओबी/मुम्बई

एससी सं. 51/2002

सी.आर. सं. 47, जविेष न्यायािीि,

मुम्बई

आरसी.10/ई/2000/सीबीआई/ईओबी/मुम्बई एससी सं. 70/2003 और

एससी सं. 2/2006

सी.आर. सं. 47, जविेष न्यायािीि,

मुम्बई

आरसी.11/ई/2000/सीबीआई/ईओबी/मुम्बई एससी सं. 71/2003 और

एससी सं. 3/2006

सी.आर. सं. 47, जविेष न्यायािीि,

मुम्बई

आरसी.8/ई/2003/सीबीआई/ईओबी/मुम्बई

एससी सं. 3/2004 और

एससी सं. 78/2015

सी.आर. सं. 47, जविेष न्यायािीि,

मुम्बई

आरसी.11/ई/2003/सीबीआई/ईओबी/मुम्बई

एससी सं. 53/2006

सी.आर. सं. 47, जविेष न्यायािीि,

मुम्बई

आरसी.6/ई/2000/सीबीआई/ईओबी/मुम्बई

एससी सं. 13/2008 और

एससी सं. 14/2008

सी.आर. सं. 47, जविेष न्यायािीि,

मुम्बई

आरसी.8/ई/2000/सीबीआई/ईओबी/मुम्बई

एससी सं. 15/2008 और

एससी सं. 16/2008

सी.आर. सं. 47, जविेष न्यायािीि,

मुम्बई

आरसी.8/ई/2009/सीबीआई/ईओबी/मुम्बई

एससी सं. 138/2009

सी.आर. सं. 47, जविेष न्यायािीि,

मुम्बई

आरसी.10/ई/2005/सीबीआई/ईओबी/मुम्बई

एससी सं. 91/2011

सी.आर. सं. 47, जविेष न्यायािीि,

मुम्बई

10 आरसी.6/ई/2012/सीबीआई/ईओबी/मुम्बई

एससी सं. 100/2012

सी.आर. सं. 47, जविेष न्यायािीि,

मुम्बई

11 आरसी.8/ई/2011/सीबीआई/ईओबी/मुम्बई

एससी सं. 103/2012

सी.आर. सं. 47, जविेष न्यायािीि,

मुम्बई

12 आरसी.5/ई/2012/सीबीई/ईओबी/मुम् बई

एससी सं. 117/2013

सी.आर. सं. 47, जविेष न्यायािीि,

मुम्बई

13 आरसी.4/ई/2012/सीबीआई/ईओबी/मुम्बई

एससी सं. 118/2013

सी.आर. सं. 47, जविेष न्यायािीि,

5218

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 14, 2024/AGRAYANA 23, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

मुम्बई

14 आरसी.17/ई/2012/सीबीआई/ईओबी/मुम्बई

एससी सं. 112/2014

सी.आर. सं. 47, जविेष न्यायािीि,

मुम्बई

15 आरसी.2/ई/2017/सीबीआई/ईओबी/मुम्बई

एससी सं. 12/2019

सी.आर. सं. 47, जविेष न्यायािीि,

मुम्बई

16 आरसी.01/ई/2020/सीबीआई/ईओबी/मुम्बई

2021 का 1637

सी.आर. सं. 47, जविेष न्यायािीि,

मुम्बई

17 आरसी.05/ई/2019/सीबीआई/ईओबी/मुम्बई

2021 का 7

सी.आर. सं. 47, जविेष न्यायािीि,

मुम्बई

18 आरसी.06/ई/2019/सीबीआई/ईओबी/मुम्बई

2021 का 8

सी.आर. सं. 47, जविेष न्यायािीि,

मुम्बई

19 आरसी.05/ई/2020/सीबीआई/ईओबी/मुम्बई

1266/2021

सी.आर. सं. 47, जविेष न्यायािीि,

मुम्बई

20 आरसी.04/ई/2017/सीबीआई/ईओबी/मुम्बई

519/2022

सी.आर. सं. 47, जविेष न्यायािीि,

मुम्बई

[फा. सं. 225/02/2024-एवीडी-II]

कुंिन नाथ, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 12th April, 2024

S.O. 2213.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Rajendra Shivaji Mhamane, Advocate as

Special Public Prosecutor for conducting prosecution of cases instituted by the Delhi Special Police Establishment

(Central Bureau of Investigation) as mentioned in the table below and appeal, revision or other matter arising out of

these cases in any appellate or revisional Court established by law, for a period of three years from the date of

assumption of charge or till disposal of the cases, whichever is earlier.

TABLE

Sr. No.

RC No.

Court Case No.

Name of the Court

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

RC.1/E/2001/CBI/EOB/Mumbai

SC No. 51/2002

C.R. No. 47, Special Judge, Mumbai

RC.10/E/2000/CBI/EOB/Mumbai

SC No. 70/2003

SC No.02/2006

C.R. No. 47, Special Judge, Mumbai

RC.11/E/2000/CBI/EOB/Mumbai

SC No. 71/2003

SC No. 03/2006

C.R. No. 47, Special Judge, Mumbai

RC.8/E/2003/CBI/EOB/Mumbai

SC No. 3/2004

SC No. 78/2015

C.R. No. 47, Special Judge, Mumbai

RC.11/E/2003/CBI/EOB/Mumbai

SC No. 53/2006

C.R. No. 47, Special Judge, Mumbai

RC.6/E/2000/CBI/EOB/Mumbai

SC No. 13/2008

SC No. 14/2008

C.R. No. 47, Special Judge, Mumbai

RC.8/E/2000/CBI/EOB/Mumbai

SC No. 15/2008

SC No. 16/2008

C.R. No. 47, Special Judge, Mumbai

RC.8/E/2009/CBI/EOB/Mumbai

SC No. 138/2009

C.R. No. 47, Special Judge, Mumbai

RC.10/E/2005/CBI/EOB/Mumbai

SC No. 91/2011

C.R. No. 47, Special Judge, Mumbai

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 14, 2024/अग्रिायण 23, 1946

5219

RC.6/E/2012/CBI/EOB/Mumbai

SC No. 100/2012

C.R. No. 47, Special Judge, Mumbai

RC.8/E/2011/CBI/EOB/Mumbai

SC No. 103/2012

C.R. No. 47, Special Judge, Mumbai

RC.5/E/2012/CBI/EOB/Mumbai

SC No. 117/2013

C.R. No. 47, Special Judge, Mumbai

RC.4/E/2012/CBI/EOB/Mumbai

SC No. 118/2013

C.R. No. 47, Special Judge, Mumbai

RC.17/E/2012/CBI/EOB/Mumbai

SC No. 112/2014

C.R. No. 47, Special Judge, Mumbai

RC.2/E/2017/CBI/EOB/Mumbai

SC No. 12/2019

C.R. No. 47, Special Judge, Mumbai

RC.01/E/2020/CBI/EOB/Mumbai

1637 of 2021

C.R. No. 47, Special Judge, Mumbai

RC.05/E/2019/CBI/EOB/Mumbai

7 of 2021

C.R. No. 47, Special Judge, Mumbai

RC.06/E/2019/CBI/EOB/Mumbai

8 of 2021

C.R. No. 47, Special Judge, Mumbai

RC.05/E/2020/CBI/EOB/Mumbai

1266/2021

C.R. No. 47, Special Judge, Mumbai

RC.4/E/2017/CBI/EOB/Mumbai

519/2022

C.R. No. 47, Special Judge, Mumbai

[F. No. 225/02/2024-AVD-II]

KUNDAN NATH, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 13 मई, 2024

का.आ. 2214.—केंद्रीय सरकार, िंड प्रदिया संजिता, 1973 (1974 का 2) की िारा 24 की उप-िारा (8) द्वारा

प्रित्त िज‍ तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए, श्री अिय कुमार गुप्ता, अजिवक्ता को उक्त सारणी के स्ट्तंभ (4) में उजल्लजखत

न्यायालयों में, नीचे िी गई सारणी के स्ट्तंभ (2) और (3) मे उजल्लजखत दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापन (केंद्रीय अन्वेषण

ब्यूरो) द्वारा स्ट्थाजपत मामलों के अजभयोिन और जवजि द्वारा स्ट्थाजपत दकसी अपीलीय अथवा पुनरीक्षण न्यायालय में इन

मामलों से उत्पन्न अपील, पुनरीक्षण या अन्य मामलों का संचालन करने के जलए जविेष लोक अजभयोिक के रूप में उनके

पिभार ग्रिण करने की तारीख से मामलों के जनपटान िोने तक या अगले आिेि तक, िो भी पिले िो, जविेष लोक

अजभयोिक जनयुक्त करती िै, अथाित्:-

सारणी

ि.सं.

आरसी सं.

न्यायालय मामला सं.

न्यायालय का नाम

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

आरसी 219 2017 ई0020 मैससि आदित्य

मीजडया नेटवकि प्रा. जल.

38/2020

जविेष न्यायािीि, आरएडीसी

आरसी 219 2017 ई0021 मैससि बालािी

टेजलकॉम (जवकास गोयल)

16/2020

जविेष न्यायािीि, आरएडीसी,

सीआर-611

आरसी 219 2017 ई0022 मैससि डी. िी.

फुटवेयर प्रा. जल. और अन्य

17/2020

जविेष न्यायािीि, आरएडीसी,

सीआर-611

आरसी 219 2017 ई0023 मैससि सॉफ्टमै‍स

रेसडंग प्रा. जल. और अन्य

6/12/2019, 18/2020

जविेष न्यायािीि, आरएडीसी,

सीआर-611

आरसी 219 2017 ई0026 (मैससि सैनवली

इम्पे‍स और अन्य)

428/2019

जविेष न्यायािीि, आरएडीसी,

सीआर-611

आरसी 219 2017 ई0024 (मैससि श्री िरर

ओवरसीि)

15/2020

जविेष न्यायािीि, आरएडीसी,

सीआर-611

आरसी 219 2017 ई0027 (मैससि जसरडीवाले

साई एज‍िम प्रा. जल.)

17/2020

जविेष न्यायािीि, आरएडीसी,

सीआर-611

आरसी 219 2017 ई0025 मैससि जमरोि

रेसडंग प्रा. जल.

39/2020

जविेष न्यायािीि, आरएडीसी,

सीआर-611

[फा. सं. 225/14/2024-एवीडी-II]

कुंिन नाथ, अवर सजचव

5220

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 14, 2024/AGRAYANA 23, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 13th May, 2024

S.O. 2214.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Ajay Kumar Gupta, Advocate as Special

Public Prosecutor for conducting prosecution of cases instituted by the Delhi Special Police Establishment (Central

Bureau of Investigation) mentioned in column (2) and (3) of the table below and, in the Court mentioned in column

(4) of the said table and any appeal, revision or other matter arising out of said cases in any appellate or revisional

Court established by law, from the date of assumption of charge, till disposal of the cases, or till further order,

whichever is earlier.

TABLE

[F. No. 225/14/2024-AVD-II]

KUNDAN NATH, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 12 िून, 2024

का.आ. 2215.—केन्द्रीय सरकार, िंड प्रदिया संजिता, 1973 (1974 का 2) की िारा 24 की उपिारा (8) द्वारा

प्रित् त िज‍ तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए, श्री िेवेन्द्र पाल ससंि, अजिवक्ता को माननीय मुंबई उच्च न्यायालय और भारत के

माननीय उच्चतम न्यायालय के समक्ष दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापन (केन्द्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो) द्वारा संजस्ट्थत सीबीआई

मामला संख्या आरसी 10/ई/2022/सीबीआई/ईओबी/मुंबई और आरसी 11/ई/2022/सीबीआई/ईओबी/मुंबई से उद्भूत

मामलों का अजभयोिन अपील, और अन्य मामलों का संचालन करने के जलए उनके द्वारा कायिभार ग्रिण करने की तारीख

से तीन वषि से अनजिक की अवजि के जलए अथवा मामलों के जनपटान िोने तक, िो भी पिले िो, जविेष लोक अजभयोिक

के रूप में जनयु‍ त करती िै।

[फा. सं. 225/20/2023-एवीडी-II]

कुंिन नाथ, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 12th June, 2024

S.O. 2215.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (8) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Davinder Pal Singh, Advocate, as Special

Public Prosecutor for conducting the prosecution, appeal or other matters arising out of CBI Cases Nos. RC

10/E/2022/CBI/EOB/Mumbai and RC 11/E/2022/CBI/EOB/Mumbai, instituted by the Delhi Special Police

Establishment (Central Bureau of Investigation), before the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay, and the Hon’ble

Supreme Court of India, for a period not exceeding three years from the date of assumption of charge or till disposal

of the cases, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 225/20/2023–AVD-II]

KUNDAN NATH, Under Secy.

Sl.

No.

RC Nos.

CC Nos.

Name of the Courts

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

RC 219 2017 E0020 M/s Aditya Media Network Pvt.

Ltd.

38/2020

Special Judge, RADC

RC 219 2017 E0021 M/s Balaji Telecom (Vikas Goel)

16/2020

Special Judge, RADC, CR-611

RC 219 2017 E0022 M/s D. G. Footwear Pvt. Ltd. &

Ors.

17/2020

Special Judge, RADC, CR-611

RC 219 2017 E0023 M/s Softmax Trading Pvt. Ltd. &

others

6/12/2019,

18/2020

Special Judge, RADC, CR-611

RC 219 2017 E0026 (M/s Sanwali Impex & ors)

428/2019

Special Judge, RADC, CR-611

RC 219 2017 E0024 (M/s Shree Hari Overseas)

15/2020

Special Judge, RADC, CR-611

RC 219 2017 E0027 (M/s Shirdiwale Sai Exim Pvt.

Ltd.)

17/2020

Special Judge, RADC, CR-611

RC 219 2017 E0025 M/s Meroz Trading Pvt. Ltd.

39/2020

Special Judge, RADC, CR-611

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 14, 2024/अग्रिायण 23, 1946

5221

नई दिल्ली, 22 अ‍ तूबर, 2024

का.आ. 2216.—केंद्र सरकार एति् द्वारा दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापना अजिजनयम, 1946 (वषि 1946 की

अजिजनयम संख्या 25) की िारा 5 की उपिारा (1) सपरठत िारा 6 द्वारा प्रित्त िजक्तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए अजिसूचना

संख्या वीआईिी-63/2024/444, दिनांक 15.03.2024, सतकिता जवभाग: जसजवल सजचवालय, ईटानगर, अरुणाचल

प्रिेि के माध्यम से िारी राज्य सरकार की सम्मजत से, लेखा कायािलय 44 बीआरटीएफ अलोंग, अरुणाचल प्रिेि में 66

लाख रुपये की राजि के अजभकजथत गबन जिसके संबंि में पूवि में आलो थाना में भारतीय िंड संजिता की िारा 409 और

34 के अंतगित दिनांक-10.07.2023 को ििि मुकिमा संख्या 0031 और ऐसे अपराि(ओं) से िुड़े या उससे संबद्ध दकसी

िुष्प्रयास, िुष्प्रेरण एवं/अथवा उसी संव्यविार में दकए गए या उन्िीं तथ्यों से उत्पन्न िोने वाले दकसी अन्य अपराि का

अन्वेषण करने के जलए दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापना के सिस्ट्यों की िजक्तयों और क्षेत्राजिकार का जवस्ट्तार समस्ट्त

अरुणाचल प्रिेि राज्य में करती िै।

[फा. सं. 228/89/2024-एवीडी-II]

सत्यम श्रीवास्ट्तव, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 22nd October, 2024

S.O. 2216.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of the

Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of State

Government of Arunachal Pradesh, issued vide Notification No. VIG-63/2024/444, Dated 15.03.2024, Department of

Vigilance : Civil Secretariat, Itanagar, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special

Police Establishment in the whole State of Arunachal Pradesh for carrying out investigation into alleged

embezzlement of Rs. 66 lakhs in Account Office 44 BRTF, Along, Arunachal Pradesh which was earlier registered as

Aalo PS Case No.0031 Dated-10.07.2023 under section 409 and 34 of IPC and any attempt, abetment and/or

conspiracy, in relation to or in connection with such offence(s) and/or for any other offence committed in the course

of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.

[F. No. 228/89/2024-AVD-II]

SATYAM SRIVASTAVA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 अ‍ तूबर, 2024

का.आ. 2217.—केन् द्र सरकार, एति् द्वारा, दिल् ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट् थापना अजिजनयम, 1946 (वषि 1946 की

अजिजनयम सं. 25) की िारा 5 की उप-िारा (1) सपरठत िारा 6 द्वारा प्रित्त िजक्तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए, तजमलनाडु

सरकार द्वारा अजिसूचना सं. िी.ओ.(2डी)सं. 294, दिनांक 25.09.2024, गृि (नागररकता) जवभाग के माध् यम से िारी

तजमलनाडु राज् य सरकार की सम्मजत से, श्री के. पुगालेंिी, तत्कालीन वररष्ठ उप जनिेिक, यातायात (पी&आर प्रकोष्ठ)

जवभाग, चेन्नई पोटि रस्ट्ट, भारत सरकार और गैर-सरकारी व्यजक्तयों श्री रघुल चिवती, श्री लुडजवन रािीव, श्री मिन

कुमार, श्री मायिीन रािा और श्री रािासलंगम, आर. एस. एंटरप्राइिेि और चेन्नई पोटि रस्ट्ट के अज्ञात लोक सेवकों के

जवरुद्ध, ‍योंदक उन्िोंने प्रथम िृष्टया भारतीय िंड संजिता की िारा 120-बी सपरठत िाराएँ 420, 468 और 471 तथा

भ्रष्टाचार जनवारण अजिजनयम, 1988 (वषि 2018 में यथासंिोजित) की िारा 7, 8 और 12 के तित अपराि दकया िै,

जनयजमत मामला ििि करने तथा एकाजिक ऐसे अपराि(िों) से िुड़े या उससे संबद्ध दकसी िुष्प्रयास, िुष्प्रेरणा एवं/अथवा

षड्यंत्र एवं/अथवा उसी संव्यविार में दकए गए या उन्िीं तथ्यों से उत्पन्न दकसी अन्य अपराि(िों) का अन्वेषण करने के जलए

दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापना के सिस्ट्यों की िजक्तयों और क्षेत्राजिकार का जवस्ट्तार समस्ट् त तजमलनाडु राज् य में करती िै।

[फा. सं. 228/88/2024-एवीडी-II]

सत्यम श्रीवास्ट्तव, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 23rd October, 2024

S.O. 2217.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of the

Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Central Act 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of

the State of Tamil Nadu, issued vide Notification No. G.O.(2D).No. 294 dated 25.09.2024, Home (Citizenship)

Department, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment in the

5222

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 14, 2024/AGRAYANA 23, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

whole of the State of Tamil Nadu for registration of a regular case against Shri K. Pugalendi, the then Senior Deputy

Director, Traffic (P&R Cell) Department, Chennai Port Trust, Government of India and the private individuals Shri

Raghul Chakaravarthy, Shri Ludwin Rajiv, Shri Madhan Kumar, Shri Mydheen Raja and Shri Rajalingam of M/s R.

S. Enterprises and unknown public servants of Chennai Port Trust, as they have prima facie committed the offence

under section 120-B r/w 420, 468 and 471 of IPC and section 7, 8 and 12 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (as

amended in 2018) and any attempt, abetment and conspiracy in relation or in connection with one or more such

offences and/or any other offence(s) committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.

[F. No. 228/88/2024-AVD-II]

SATYAM SRIVASTAVA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 24 अ‍ तूबर, 2024

का.आ. 2218.—केन्द्र सरकार एति द्वारा दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापना अजिजनयम, 1946 (1946 का 25) की

िारा 5 की उप-िारा (1) सपरठत िारा 6 द्वारा प्रित्त िजक्तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए पुजलस अिीक्षक एवं िाखा प्रमुख,

केन्द्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो, भ्रष्टाचार जनरोिक िाखा, िनबाि के दिनांक 17.09.2024 के पत्र संख्या – 408/सीओ-12/2024

द्वारा दकए गए अनुरोि पर, अजिसूचना ज्ञापन सं.-10/सी.बी.आई.-429/2024-5699/रांची, दिनांक 26.09.2024, गृि,

कारागार एवं आपिा प्रबंिन जवभाग के माध्यम से िारी झारखंड राज्य सरकार की सम्मजत से श्री प्रवीण कुमार जमश्रा,

प्रबंिक (ई-5), श्यामपुर “बी” कोजलयरी, ईसीएल, मुगमा क्षेत्र, जनरसा, िनबाि के जवरुद्ध मोिम्मि सलीम, सामान्य

मििूर, श्यामपुर “बी” कोजलयरी, मुगमा क्षेत्र, ईसीएल, जनरसा, िनबाि द्वारा दिनांक 11.09.2024 को ििि की गई

जिकायत से उत्पन्न दिनांक 27.09.2024 को पंिीकृत आरसी 08(ए)/2024-डी का भ्रष्टाचार जनवारण अजिजनयम, 1988

(यथासंिोजित 2018) की िारा 7 के अंतगित िंडनीय अपरािों का पंिीकरण एवं अन्वेषण करने तथा ऐसे एक या उससे

अजिक अपराि(िों) से िुड़े या उससे संबद्ध दकसी िुष्प्रयास, िुष्प्रेरणा और/अथवा षड्यंत्र सजित इस मामले के अन्वेषण के

िौरान सामने आने वाले अन्य अपरािों एवं/अथवा उसी संव्यविार में दकए गए या उन्िीं तथ्यों से उत्पन्न दकसी अन्य

अपराि(िों) का अन्वेषण करने के जलए दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापना के सिस्ट्यों की िजक्तयों और क्षेत्राजिकार का जवस्ट्तार

(दिनांक 27.09.2024 से कायोत्तर प्रभाव से) करती िै।

[फाा. सं. 228/90/2024-एवीडी-II]

सत्यम श्रीवास्ट्तव, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 24th October, 2024

S.O. 2218.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of the

Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the State

Government of Jharkhand, issued vide Notification Memo No.-10/C.B.I.-429/2024-5699/Ranchi dated 26.09.2024,

Home, Prisons and Disaster Management Department upon request made via letter number-408/CO-12/2024 dated

17.09.2024 of S.P. & Head of Branch, CBI, ACB, Dhanbad, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the

members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment (ex post facto w.e.f 27.09.2024) for registration and investigation

into the offences in RC 08(A)/2024-D registered on 27.09.2024 punishable under section 7 of the Prevention of

Corruption Act, 1988 (as amended in 2018) against Shri Praveen Kumar Mishra, Manager (E-5), Shyampur “B”

Colliery, ECL, Mugma Area, Nirsa, Dhanbad arising out of the complaint dated 11.09.2024 lodged by Md. Salim,

General Mazdoor, Shyampur “B” Colliery, Mugma Area, ECL, Nirsa, Dhanbad and any other offences that may

come to light during investigation of this case, including any attempt, abetment and conspiracy in relation to or in

connection with one or more such offences and /or any other offence(s) committed in the course of the same

transaction or arising out of the same facts.

[F. No. 228/90/2024-AVD-II]

SATYAM SRIVASTAVA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 25 अ‍ तूबर, 2024

का.आ. 2219.—केन् द्र सरकार, एति् द्वारा, दिल् ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट् थापना अजिजनयम, 1946 (1946 का केन्द्रीय

अजिजनयम 25) की िारा 5 की उप-िारा (1) सपरठत िारा 6 द्वारा प्रित्त िजक्तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केरल राज् य

सरकार की अजिसूचना सं. िी.ओ. (एमएस.)सं.72/2024/गृि, जतरुवनंतपुरम, दिनांक 11.03.2024, गृि (एससी)

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 14, 2024/अग्रिायण 23, 1946

5223

जवभाग (एस.आर.ओ. सं. 260/2024) के माध्यम से िारी सम्मजत से, मेससि मास्ट्टसि दफनसवि/मास्ट्टसि ग्रुप/मास्ट्टसि

दफनकॉपि/मास्ट्टसि दफनकेयर, चक्कराजपल्ली, एवेन्यू, 3सरा तल, सीपोटि एयरपोटि रोड, कक्कानाड, एनािकुलम द्वारा जवजभन्न

व्यजक्तयों से लेकर संचाजलत दकए िा रिे अजवजनयजमत िमा के संबंि में थ्रीक्काक्कारा थाना में भारतीय िंड संजिता, 1860

(1860 का केन्द्रीय अजिजनयम 45) और अजवजनयजमत जनक्षेप स्ट्कीम पाबंिी अजिजनयम, 2019 (2019 का अजिजनयम

21)

के

प्राविानों

के

तित

िंडनीय

अपरािों

से

संबंजित

अपराि

सं.

1156/2022

(सीबी/23/ईओडब्ल्यू/ईकेएम/आर/2023), 1159/2022, 1161/2022 और 1172/2022 साथ िी पंिीकृत अन्य

संबंजित मामलों अथवा इन मामलों के अन्वेषण की जिम्मेिारी सीबीआई द्वारा लेने तक पंिीकृत अन्य मामलों से िुड़े

अपरािों तथा केरल राज्य के भीतर इन मामलों से िुड़े उसी संव्यविार में दकए गए या उन्िीं तथ्यों से उत्पन्न दकसी अन्य

अपराि तथा ऐसे अपराि(िों) से िुड़े या उससे संबद्ध दकसी िुष्प्रयास, िुष्प्रेरणा और/अथवा षड्यंत्र एवं/अथवा का

अन्वेषण करने के जलए दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापना के सिस्ट्यों की िजक्तयों और क्षेत्राजिकार का जवस्ट्तार समस्ट्त केरल

राज्य में करती िै।

[फाा. सं. 228/34/2024-एवीडी-II]

सत्यम श्रीवास्ट्तव, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 25th October, 2024

S.O. 2219.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of the

Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Central Act 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of

the State Government of Kerala, issued vide Notification G.O.(Ms.)No.72/2024/Home, Thiruvananthapuram, dated

11.03.2024, Home (SC) Department (S.R.O.No. 260/2024), hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the

members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment in the whole of the State of Kerala, for the investigation into the

offences involved in the Crime No. 1156/2022 (CB/23/EOW/EKM/R/2023), 1159/2022, 1161/2022 and 1172/2022 of

Thrikkakkara Police Station, as well as other connected cases registered or to be registered until the CBI takes over

these cases, in connection with the unregulated deposit taking conducted by M/s Masters Finserve/Masters

Group/Masters Fincorp/Masters Fincare, Chakkarapilly Avenue, 3rd Floor, Seaport Airport Road Kakkanad,

Ernakulam from various persons, punishable under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Central Act 45 of

1860), and the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019 (Act 21 of 2019 and any other offence committed

in the course of same transaction or arising out of the same facts, in regard to these cases within the State of Kerala

and any attempt, abetment and/or conspiracy, in relation to or in connection with such offence(s) and/or for any other

offence committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.

[F. No. 228/34/2024-AVD-II]

SATYAM SRIVASTAVA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 30 अ‍ तूबर, 2024

का.आ. 2220.—केन् द्र सरकार, एति् द्वारा, दिल् ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट् थापना अजिजनयम, 1946 (वषि 1946 की

अजिजनयम सं. 25) की िारा 3 द्वारा प्रित्त िजक्तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए जनम्नजलजखत अपरािों को जवजनर्ििष्ट करती िै,

जिनकी िांच भी दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापना के सिस्ट्यों द्वारा की िानी िै, नामतः:-

(क)

मिाराष्ट्र जवश्वजवद्यालय, बोडि और अन्य जवजनर्ििष्ट परीक्षाओं में किाचार जनवारण अजिजनयम, 1982 (1982 का

अजिजनयम सं. XXXI) की िारा 7 और 8 के अंतगित िंडनीय अपरािों; और

(ख)

ऊपर उजल्लजखत अपराि(िों) से िुड़े या उससे संबद्ध दकसी िुष्प्रयास, िुष्प्रेरणा एवं/अथवा षड्यंत्र एवं/अथवा

उसी संव्यविार में दकए गए या उन्िीं तथ्यों से उत्पन्न दकसी अन्य अपराि(िों)।

[फाा. सं. 228/66/2024-एवीडी-II]

सत्यम श्रीवास्ट्तव, अवर सजचव

5224

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 14, 2024/AGRAYANA 23, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 30th October, 2024

S.O. 2220.— In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act,

1946 ( Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government hereby specifies the following offences which are also to be

investigated by the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment, namely :-

(a)

Offences punishable under sections 7 and 8 of THE MAHARASHTRA PREVENTION OF

MALPRACTICES AT UNIVERSITY, BOARD AND OTHER SPECIFIED EXAMINATION, ACT 1982 (ACT NO.

XXXI OF 1982) and

(b)

Any attempt, abetment and/or conspiracy, in relation to or in connection with above mentioned offence(s)

and/or for any other offence(s) committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.

[F. No. 228/66/2024-AVD-II]

SATYAM SRIVASTAVA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 30 अ‍ तूबर, 2024

का.आ. 2221.—केन्द्र सरकार एति द्वारा दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापना अजिजनयम, 1946 (1946 का अजिजनयम सं.

XXV) की िारा 5 की उप-िारा (1) सपरठत िारा 6 द्वारा प्रित्त िजक्तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए आिेि सं. जवजवि-

0624/सी.आर.43/पोल-13, दिनांक 25.07.2024, गृि जवभाग, मुंबई के माध्यम से िारी मिाराष्ट्र राज्य सरकार की सम्मजत से

भा.िं.सं. की िारा 419, 34, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120(बी), 201 सपरठत मिाराष्ट्र जवश्वजवद्यालय, बोडि और अन्य जनर्ििष्ट

परीक्षाओं में किाचार जनवारण अजिजनयम, 1982 की िारा 7 एवं 8 के अंतगित सीबीडी बेलापुर थाना, नवी मुंबई, मिाराष्ट्र राज्य में

सी.आर. सं.98/2024 द्वारा पंिीकृत मामले के संबंि में एवं उक्त मामलों के अन्वेषण के िौरान सामने आने वाला अन्य कोई अपराि का

अन्वेषण करने तथा ऐसे अपराि(िों) से िुड़े या उससे संबद्ध दकसी िुष्प्रयास, िुष्प्रेरणा और/अथवा षड्यंत्र एवं/अथवा उसी संव्यविार में

दकए गए या उन्िीं तथ्यों से उत्पन्न दकसी अन्य अपराि का अन्वेषण करने के जलए दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापना (डीएसपीई) के सिस्ट्यों

की िजक्तयों और क्षेत्राजिकार का जवस्ट्तार समस्ट्त मिाराष्ट्र राज्य में करती िै।

[फाा. सं. 228/66/2024-एवीडी-II]

सत्यम श्रीवास्ट्तव, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 30th October, 2024

S.O. 2221.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of the

Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. XXV of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of

the State Government of Maharashtra, issued vide Order No. Misc-0624/C.R.43/Pol-13, Dated 25.07.2024, Home

Department, Mumbai hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police

Establishment (DSPE) in the whole of the State of Maharashtra for investigation in respect of the crime registered

vide C.R. No.98/2024 at CBD Belapur Police station, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra State under Section 419, 34, 465,

467, 468, 471, 120(B), 201 of IPC r/w Section 7 & 8 of Maharashtra Prevention of Malpractices at University, Board

and other specified Examinations Act, 1982 and any other offence that may come to light during investigation of the

said cases and any attempt, abetment and/or conspiracy, in relation to or in connection with such offence(s) and/or for

any other offence committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.

[F. No. 228/66/2024-AVD-II]

SATYAM SRIVASTAVA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 13 नवम् बर, 2024

का.आ. 2222.—केन् द्र सरकार, एति् द्वारा, दिल् ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट् थापना अजिजनयम, 1946 (वषि 1946 की

अजिजनयम सं. 25) की िारा 5 की उप-िारा (1) सपरठत िारा 6 द्वारा प्रित्त िजक्तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए मिाराष्ट्र राज् य

सरकार की अजिसूचना सं. एच.डी.-12010/14/2024-पॉल2-एमएचडी, दिनांक 24 िुलाई, 2024, गृि जवभाग,

मंत्रालय के माध् यम से कायोत्तर प्रभाव से िारी सम्मजत से, जविेिी अजभिाय (जवजनयमन) अजिजनयम, 2010 की िाराएँ

33, 35, 37 और 39 के तित एमएचए संिभि सं. II/21022/58(81)2019-एफसीआरए (एमयू), नई दिल्ली, दिनांक

15.05.2019 (दिनांक 13 िून, 2019 को ििि सीबीआई संिभि सं. आरसी-0682019ई0004) का अन्वेषण करने के जलए

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 14, 2024/अग्रिायण 23, 1946

5225

तथा ऐसे अपराि(िों) से िुड़े या उससे संबद्ध दकसी िुष्प्रयास, िुष्प्रेरणा एवं/अथवा षड्यंत्र एवं/अथवा उसी संव्यविार में

दकए गए या उन्िीं तथ्यों से उत्पन्न दकसी अन्य अपराि का अन्वेषण करने के जलए दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापना के सिस्ट्यों

की िजक्तयों और क्षेत्राजिकार का जवस्ट्तार (कायोत्तर प्रभाव से दिनांक 13.06.2019 से) समस्ट् त मिाराष्ट्र राज् य में

करती िै।

[फाा. सं. 228/80/2024-एवीडी-II]

सत्यम श्रीवास्ट्तव, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 13th November, 2024

S.O. 2222.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of the

Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No.25 of 1946), the Central Government with the Ex-Post-facto

consent of the State Government of Maharashtra, issued vide Notification No: H.D.-12010/14/2024-POL2-MHD,

dated the 24th July of 2024, Home Department, Mantralaya, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the

members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment (ex post facto w.e.f. 13.06.2019) in the whole State of

Maharashtra for investigation of MHA reference No.II/21022/58(81) 2019-FCRA (MU), New Delhi dated 15.05.2019

(CBI reference No.RC-0682019E0004 registered on 13th June, 2019) Under Sections 33, 35, 37 and 39 of Foreign

Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 and any attempt, abetment and/or conspiracy, in relation to or in connection with

such offence(s) and/or for any other offence committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the

same facts

[F. No. 228/80/2024-AVD-II]

SATYAM SRIVASTAVA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 21 नवम् बर, 2024

का.आ. 2223.—केन्द्र सरकार, एति द्वारा, दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापना अजिजनयम, 1946 (1946 का केन्द्रीय

अजिजनयम 25) की िारा 5 की उप-िारा (1) सपरठत िारा 6 द्वारा प्रित्त िजक्तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए, माननीय

राज्यपाल द्वारा अजिसूचना सं. िी.ओ.(2डी).सं.257, दिनांक 12.08.2024, गृि (नागररकता) जवभाग तथा संिोजित

अजिसूचना सं. िी.ओ.(2डी).सं.321, दिनांक 22.10.2024, गृि (नागररकता) जवभाग के माध्यम से िारी तजमलनाडु

राज्य सरकार की सम्मजत से 1. श्री पी. अररवलगन, पुत्र श्री पेररयासामी, जनवासी 11/400 एमआईिी, एनटीएचबी,

मुल्लई नगर, पजिम तांबरम, चेन्नई (एनआरआई), 2. मेससि िय इंिीजनयसि (श्री ियचंद्रन, पनेल वेलुएर द्वारा

प्रजतजनजित्व), 3. श्री एस. सूयिनारायणन, पनेल वेलुएर, चेन्नई, 4. श्री डी. संथोष, पुत्र श्री िनसेकरन, चेन्नई, 5. श्री एम.

वेिमूर्ति (फ्लैटों के माजलक), 6. श्री जिटलर नतेसन, मेससि रॉयल इंटरनेिनल तथा भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक के अज्ञात बैंक कर्मियों

के जवरुद्ध भारतीय स्ट्टेट बैंक को 3,64,74,118/- रु. का सिोष िाजन काररत करने के जलए भा.िं.सं. की िारा 120-बी,

सपरठत िारा 420, 468, 471 एवं भ्रष्टाचार जनवारण अजिजनयम, 1988 (यथासंिोजित 2018) की िारा 13(2)

सपरठत 13(1)(ए) के अंतगित केन्द्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो, भ्रष्टाचार जनरोिक िाखा, चेन्नई द्वारा मामले को पंिीकृत करने तथा

अन्वेषण करने तथा ऐसे एक या उससे अजिक अपराि(िों) से िुड़े या उससे संबद्ध दकसी िुष्प्रयास, िुष्प्रेरणा और षड्यंत्र

एवं/अथवा उसी संव्यविार में दकए गए या उन्िीं तथ्यों से उत्पन्न दकसी अन्य अपराि(िों) का अन्वेषण करने के जलए दिल्ली

जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापना के सिस्ट्यों की िजक्तयों और क्षेत्राजिकार का जवस्ट्तार समस्ट्त तजमलनाडु राज्य में करती िै।

[फाा. सं. 228/91/2024-एवीडी-II]

रािीव कुमार खरे, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 21st November, 2024

S.O. 2223.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of the

Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Central Act 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of

the State Government of Tamil Nadu, issued vide Notification No. G.O.(2D).No.257 dated 12.08.2024, Home

(Citizenship) Department and Amended Notification No. G.O.(2D).No.321 dated 22.10.2024, Home (Citizenship)

Department, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment in the

whole of the State of Tamil Nadu for registration of a case and investigation by Central Bureau of Investigation, Anti-

Corruption Branch, Chennai under section 120-B, r/w 420, 468, 471 of IPC and under section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(a) of

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (as amended in 2018) against 1. Shri P.Arivalagan, S/o Shri Periyasamy, R/o.

11/400 MIG, NTHB, Mullai Nagar, West Tambaram, Chennai (NRI), 2. M/s Jai Engineers represented by Shri

Jayachandran, Panel Valuer, 3. Shri S.Suryanarayanan, Panel Valuer, Chennai, 4. Shri D.Santhosh, S/o. Shri

5226

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 14, 2024/AGRAYANA 23, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Dhanasekaran, Chennai, 5. Shri M.Vedamurthy (owner of the flats), 6. Shri Hitler Natesan, M/s., Royal International

and unknown Bank Officials of the State Bank of India for causing wrongful loss of Rs. 3,64,74,118/- to the State

Bank of India, Chennai and any attempt, abetment and conspiracy in relation or in connection with one or more such

offences and/or any other offence(s) committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.

[F. No. 228/91/2024-AVD-II]

RAJEEV KUMAR KHARE, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 21 नवम् बर, 2024

का.आ. 2224.—केन्द्र सरकार एति द्वारा दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापना अजिजनयम, 1946 (1946 का 25) की

िारा 5 की उप-िारा (1) सपरठत िारा 6 द्वारा प्रित्त िजक्तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए िाखा प्रमुख, केन्द्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो,

भ्रष्टाचार जनरोिक िाखा, िनबाि के दिनांक 24.09.2024 के पत्र संख्या 421/सीओ-13/2024 द्वारा दकए गए अनुरोि

पर अजिसूचना ज्ञापन सं.-10/सी.बी.आई.-430/2024-5837/रांची, दिनांक 07.10.2024, गृि, कारागार एवं आपिा

प्रबंिन जवभाग के माध्यम से िारी झारखंड राज्य सरकार की सम्मजत से श्री सुरेि ठाकुर, जलजपक, कथारा कोल वािरी,

सीसीएल, बोकारो, झारखंड के जवरुद्ध दिनांक 07.10.2024 को पंिीकृत आरसी.09(ए)/2024-डी का भ्रष्टाचार जनवारण

अजिजनयम, 1988 (यथासंिोजित 2018) की िारा 7 के अंतगित िंडनीय अपराि(िों) तथा इस मामले के अन्वेषण के

िौरान सामने आने वाले दकसी अन्य अपराि का पंिीकरण एवं अन्वेषण करने तथा ऐसे अपराि(िों) से िुड़े या उससे

संबद्ध दकसी िुष्प्रयास, िुष्प्रेरणा और/अथवा षड्यंत्र एवं/अथवा उसी संव्यविार में दकए गए या उन्िीं तथ्यों से उत्पन्न दकसी

अन्य अपराि का अन्वेषण करने के जलए दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापना के सिस्ट्यों की िजक्तयों और क्षेत्राजिकार का जवस्ट्तार

(दिनांक 07.10.2024 से कायोत्तर प्रभाव से) करती िै।

[फाा. सं. 228/92/2024-एवीडी-II]

रािीव कुमार खरे, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 21st November, 2024

S.O. 2224.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of the

Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the State

Government of Jharkhand, issued vide Notification Memo No.-10/C.B.I-430/2024-5837 Ranchi, dated 07.10.2024,

Home, Prisons and Disaster Management Department upon request made via letter number 421/CO-13/2024, dated

24.09.2024 of Head of Branch, CBI, ACB, Dhanbad, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of

the Delhi Special Police Establishment (ex post facto w.e.f 07.10.2024) for registration and investigation into the

offence(s) in RC.09(A)/2024-D registered on 07.10.2024 punishable under section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption

Act, 1988 (as amended in 2018), against Shri Suresh Thakur, Clerk, Kathara Coal Washery, CCL, Bokaro, Jharkhand

and any other offence that may come to light during investigation of this case and any attempt, abetment and/or

conspiracy, in relation to or in connection with such offence(s) and/or for any other offence committed in the course

of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.

[F. No. 228/92/2024-AVD-II]

RAJEEV KUMAR KHARE, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 22 नवम् बर, 2024

का.आ. 2225.—केन्द्रीय सरकार दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापन अजिजनयम, 1946 (1946 का केंद्रीय अजिजनयम

25) की िारा 5 उप-िारा (1) सपरठत िारा 6, सपरठत सािारण खण्ड अजिजनयम, 1897 (1897 का केन्द्रीय अजिजनयम

10) की िारा 21 के तित प्रित्त िजक्तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए, तजमलनाडु राज्य सरकार की अजिसूचना सं. िी.ओ.(2डी).

सं. 320, दिनांक 22.10.2024, गृि (पुजलस-14) जवभाग द्वारा िारी सम्मजत से, श्री अन्नािुरई, अिीक्षक, िीएसटी और

केंद्रीय उत्पाि िुल्क, िमिपुरी और श्री कार्तिकेयन, जनरीक्षक, िीएसटी और केंद्रीय उत्पाि िुल्क, िमिपुरी, भारत सरकार के

जवरूद्ध भ्रष्टाचार जनवारण अजिजनयम, 1988 (2018 में यथासंिोजित) की िारा 7 के तित दिनांक 26.10.2024 को

पंिीकृत सीबीआई प्रकरण RC0322024A0016 और ऐसे अपराि(िों) से संबंजित या िुड़े दकसी िुष्प्रयास, िुष्प्रेरणा

और/या साजिि, या उसी संव्यविार में या उन्िीं तथ्यों से उत्पन्न िोने वाले दकसी अन्य अपराि का पंिीकरण और अन्वेषण

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 14, 2024/अग्रिायण 23, 1946

5227

करने के जलए दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापन के सिस्ट्यों के क्षेत्राजिकार और िजक्तयों का जवस्ट्तार (दिनांक 26.10.2024 से

कायोत्तर प्रभाव से) संपूणि तजमलनाडु राज्य में करती िै।

[फाा. सं. 228/93/2024-एवीडी-II]

सत्यम श्रीवास्ट्तव, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 22nd November, 2024

S.O. 2225.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of the

Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Central Act XXV of 1946) read with section 21 of the General Clauses

Act, 1897 (Central Act X of 1879), the Central Government with the consent of the State Government of Tamil Nadu,

issued vide Notification No. G.O. (2D) No.320 dated 22.10.2024, Home (Police-XIV) Department, hereby extends

the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment (ex post facto w.e.f 26.10.2024)

in the whole state of Tamil Nadu for registration and investigation in CBI case RC0322024A0016 registered on

26.10.2024 under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (as amended in 2018) against Shri.Annadurai,

Superintendent, GST and Central Excise, Dharmapuri and Shri.Karthikeyan, Inspector, GST and Central Excise,

Dharmapuri, Government of India and any attempt, abetment and/or conspiracy, in relation to or in connection with

such offence(s) and/or for any other offence committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the

same facts.

[F. No. 228/93/2024-AVD-II]

SATYAM SRIVASTAVA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम् बर, 2024

का.आ. 2226.—केन्द्र सरकार एति द्वारा दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापना अजिजनयम, 1946 (1946 का

अजिजनयम सं. 25) की िारा 5 की उप-िारा (1) सपरठत िारा 6 द्वारा प्रित्त िजक्तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए अजिसूचना सं.

एफ.19(39)गृि-5/2021, ियपुर, दिनांक 31.10.2023, गृि (िीआर.-V) जवभाग के माध्यम से िारी रािस्ट्थान राज्य

सरकार की सम्मजत से थाना रातानाडा, िोिपुर पूवि, पुजलस आयुक्तालय, िोिपुर (रािस्ट्थान) में भा.िं.सं. की िारा

121ए, 201, 302, 120बी तथा एससी/एसटी अजिजनयम की िारा 3(2)(v)(vए) के अंतगित एफआईआर सं. 200/2023

का अन्वेषण करने तथा ऐसे अपराि(िों) से िुड़े या उससे संबद्ध दकसी िुष्प्रयास, िुष्प्रेरणा और/अथवा षड्यंत्र एवं/अथवा

उसी संव्यविार में दकए गए या उन्िीं तथ्यों से उत्पन्न दकसी अन्य अपराि का अन्वेषण करने के जलए दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस

स्ट्थापना के सिस्ट्यों की िजक्तयों और क्षेत्राजिकार का जवस्ट्तार समस्ट्त रािस्ट्थान राज्य में करती िै।

[फाा. सं. 228/86/2021-एवीडी-II)]

सत्यम श्रीवास्ट्तव, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 29th November, 2024

S.O. 2226.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of the

Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the

State Government of Rajasthan, issued vide Notification No. F.19(39)Home-5/2021, Jaipur, Dated 31.10.2023, Home

(Gr.-V) Department, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police

Establishment in the whole State of Rajasthan for the investigation of FIR No. 200/2023 under section 121A, 201,

302, 120B IPC, 3(2)(v)(va) SC/ST Act registered at Police Station Ratanada, Jodhpur East, Police Commissionerate,

Jodhpur (Rajasthan) and any attempt, abetment and/or conspiracy, in relation to or in connection with such offence(s)

and/or for any other offence committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.

[F. No. 228/86/2021-AVD-II]

SATYAM SRIVASTAVA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम् बर, 2024

का.आ. 2227.—केन् द्र सरकार दिल् ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट् थापन अजिजनयम, 1946 (1946 का 25) की िारा 5 की

उप-िारा (1) सपरठत िारा 6 द्वारा प्रित्त िजक्तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए केरल राज् य सरकार की अजिसूचना सं.

5228

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 14, 2024/AGRAYANA 23, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

िी.ओ.(एमएस.) सं.255/2022/गृि, दिनांक 02.12.2022 (एस.आर.ओ. सं. 1162/2022) और िुजद्ध पत्र अजिसूचना

िी.ओ.(एमएस.) सं.215/2024/गृि, दिनांक 06.10.2024 (एस.आर.ओ. सं. 893/2024), गृि (एम) जवभाग,

जतरुवनंतपुरम के माध्यम से िारी सम्मजत से श्री रोजित खत्री, जनरीक्षक, सीमा िुल्क, कालीकट अंतरािष्ट्रीय जवमानपत्तन,

कररपुर, मलप्पुरम, केरल और अन्य अज्ञातों, यदि कोई िो, के जवरूद्ध सीमा िुल्क द्वारा िब्त दकए गए सोने के अवैि

िुर्विजनयोिन के जलए भारतीय िंड संजिता, 1860 (1860 का केन्द्रीय अजिजनयम 45) की िारा 120बी और 409 तथा

भ्रष्टाचार जनवारण अजिजनयम, 1988 (2018 के केन्द्रीय अजिजनयम 16 द्वारा यथासंिोजित) की िारा 13 की उप-िारा

(1) के खंड (क) सपरठत उप-िारा (2) के तित दिनांक 16.12.2022 को पंिीकृत आरसी 0332022ए0004 में िंडनीय

अपरािों तथा ऐसे अपराि(िों) से िुड़े या उससे संबद्ध दकसी िुष्प्रयास, िुष्प्रेरणा और/अथवा षड्यंत्र एवं/अथवा उसी

संव्यविार में दकए गए उन्िीं तथ्यों से उत्पन्न दकसी अन्य अपराि का पंिीकरण और अन्वेषण करने के जलए दिल्ली जविेष

पुजलस स्ट्थापन के सिस्ट्यों की िजक्तयों और क्षेत्राजिकार का जवस्ट्तार (दिनांक 16.12.2022 से कायोत्तर प्रभाव से) समस्ट्त

केरल राज्य में करती िै।

[फाा. सं. 228/27/2023-एवीडी-II)]

सत्यम श्रीवास्ट्तव, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 29th November, 2024

S.O. 2227.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of the

Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the State

Government of Kerala, issued vide Notification No. G.O. (Ms.) No.255/2022/Home, dated 02.12.2022 (S. R. O. No.

1162/2022) and Erratum Notification G.O.(Ms.) No. 215/2024/HOME, dated 06.10.2024 (S. R. O. No. 893/2024),

Home (M) Department, Thiruvananthapuram, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi

Special Police Establishment (ex post facto w.e.f. 16.12.2022) in the whole of the State of Kerala for registration and

investigation into the offences in RC 0332022A0004 registered on 16.12.2022 punishable under section 120B and

409 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Central Act 45 of 1860) and clause (a) of sub-section (1) read with sub-section (2) of

Section 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (as amended by the Central Act 16 of 2018) against Shri Rohit

Khatri, Inspector, Customs, Calicut International Airport, Karippur, Malappuram, Kerala and unknown others, if any

for the clandestine misappropriation of seized gold by Customs and any attempt, abetment and conspiracy in relation

to or in connection with one or more such offences and /or any other offence(s) committed in the course of the same

transaction or arising out of the same facts.

[F. No. 228/27/2023-AVD-II]

SATYAM SRIVASTAVA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 3 दिसम् बर, 2024

का.आ. 2228.—केन्द्रीय सरकार दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापन अजिजनयम, 1946 (1946 का 25) की िारा 5

की उप-िारा (1) सपरठत िारा 6 द्वारा प्रित्त िजक्तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए पुजलस उपमिाजनरीक्षक/िाखा प्रमुख, केन्द्रीय

अन्वेषण ब्यूरो, भ्रष्टाचार जनरोिक िाखा, रांची के दिनांक 11.07.2024 के पत्र संख्या 424/एसआई-4/2022-आर द्वारा

दकए गए अनुरोि पर गृि, कारागार एवं आपिा प्रबंिन जवभाग की अजिसूचना ज्ञापन संख्या 10/सी.बी.आई.-424/2024-

4717/रांची, दिनांक 05.08.2024 तथा पुजलस उपमिाजनरीक्षक/िाखा प्रमुख, केन्द्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो, भ्रष्टाचार जनरोिक

िाखा, रांची के दिनांक 09.10.2024 के पत्र संख्या 598/एसआई-4/2022-आर के अनुरोि पर गृि, कारागार एवं आपिा

प्रबंिन जवभाग के िुजद्धपत्र अजिसूचना ज्ञापन संख्या 10/सी.बी.आई.-424/2024-6322/रांची, दिनांक 30.10.2024 के

माध्यम से िारी झारखंड राज्य सरकार की सम्मजत से श्री अभय कुमार, तत्कालीन मिाप्रबंिक (पररयोिना), रेल इंजडया

टेदक्नकल एंड इकोनॉजम‍स सर्विसेि जलजमटेड (RITES Ltd.), रांची, िो रेल मंत्रालय के अिीनस्ट्थ िैं, के जवरूद्ध

भ्रष्टाचार जनवारण अजिजनयम, 1988 (2018 के संिोिन से पिले) की िारा 13(2) सपरठत िारा 13(1)(ई) और

भ्रष्टाचार जनवारण अजिजनयम, 1988 (वषि 2018 में यथासंिोजित) की िारा 13(2) सपरठत िारा 13(1)(बी) के अंतगित

िंडनीय अपरािों तथा अन्वेषण के िौरान सामने आने वाले अन्य अपराि(िों) सजित एक या उससे अजिक ऐसे अपरािों से

िुड़े या उससे संबद्ध दकसी िुष्प्रयास, िुष्प्रेरणा और षड्यंत्र एवं/अथवा उसी संव्यविार में दकए गए या उन्िीं तथ्यों से उत्पन्न

दकसी अन्य अपराि(िों) के जलए एक जनयजमत मामले का पंिीकरण करने के जलए दिल्ली जविेष पुजलस स्ट्थापन के सभी

सिस्ट्यों की िजक्तयों और क्षेत्राजिकार का जवस्ट्तार झारखंड राज्य में करती िै।

[फाा. सं. 228/99/2024-एवीडी-II)]

सत्यम श्रीवास्ट्तव, अवर सजचव

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 14, 2024/अग्रिायण 23, 1946

5229

New Delhi, the 3rd December, 2024

S.O. 2228.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of the

Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the State

Government of Jharkhand, issued vide Notification Memo No.10/C.B.I.-424/2024-4717/Ranchi dated 05.08.2024,

Home, Prisons and Disaster Management Department upon request made vide letter No. 424/SI-4/2022-R, dated

11.07.2024 of DIG of Police/Head of Branch, CBI, ACB, Ranchi and corrigendum Notification Memo No.10/C.B.I.-

424/2024-6322/Ranchi dated 30.10.2024, Home, Prisons and Disaster Management Department upon request made

vide letter No. 598/SI-4/2022-R, dated 09.10.2024 of DIG of Police/Head of Branch, CBI, ACB, Ranchi hereby

extends the powers and jurisdiction to all the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment in the State of

Jharkhand for registration of a regular case against Shri Abhay Kumar, the then General Manager (Project), Rail India

Technical and Economics Services Ltd. (RITES Ltd.) Ranchi, under Ministry of Railway, for committing offences

U/s 13(2) r/w 13(1)(e) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (before the amendment of 2018) and U/s 13 (2) r/w

13(1)(b) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (as amended in year 2018) and any other offences(s) that may come

into the light during investigation of case including any attempt, abetment and conspiracy in relation to or in

connection with one or more such offences and/or any other offence(s) committed in the course of the same

transaction or arising out of the same facts.

[F. No. 228/99/2024-AVD-II]

SATYAM SRIVASTAVA, Under Secy.

सूचना और प्रसारण मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 4 दिसम् बर, 2024

का.आ. 2229.—केंद्र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम, 1976 के जनयम 10

के उप जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में सूचना और प्रसारण मंत्रालय के अिीनस्ट्थ कायािलय यथा इले‍रॉजनक मीजडया मॉजनटररंग

सेंटर, नई दिल्ली जिनके 80% से अजिक कमिचाररयों ने सिंिी का कायिसािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जलया िै, को अजिसूजचत

करती िै ।

[फाा. सं. ई-11017/10/2017-सिंिी]

िसवंत ससंि, सिायक जनिेिक (रािभाषा)

MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING

New Delhi, the 4th December, 2024

S.O. 2229.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purposes

of the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the subordinate office of Ministry of Information

and Broadcasting namely Electronic Media Monitoring Center, New Delhi whereof more than 80% of the staff have

acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.

[F. No. E-11017/10/2017-Hindi]

JASWANT SINGH, Assistant Director (O.L.)

जवद्युत मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 5 दिसम् बर, 2024

का.आ. 2230. —केंद्रीय सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम, 1976 के

जनयम 10 के उप जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में जवद्युत मंत्रालय के प्रिासजनक जनयंत्रणािीन जनम्नजलजखत कायािलयों, जिनके

80 प्रजतित कमिचारीवृंि ने सिंिी का कायिसािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जलया िै, को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजचत करती िै:

एनएचपीसी जलजमटेड,

उड़ी पावर स्ट्टेिन,

एनिी एदफजिएंसी सर्विसेज़ जलजमटेड,

प्रथम तल, आरएमडी जबसल्डंग,

5230

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 14, 2024/AGRAYANA 23, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

सगंगल, जिला- बारामुल्ला,

िम्मू व कश्मीर - 193122

लेन नंबर-4, इंडजस्ट्रयल एस्ट्टेट जसकॉप,

जडजगयाना, िीवन नगर,

िम्मू – 180004

एनिी एदफजिएंसी सर्विसेज़ जलजमटेड,

भू-तल, नेिनल स्ट्कूल के पीछे,

करण नगर,

श्रीनगर – 190010

िामोिर घाटी जनगम,

मैथन डैम पररयोिना,

पोस्ट्ट – मैथन डैम, जिला- िनबाि

झारखंड - 828207

एनटीपीसी जलजमटेड,

बोंगाईगांव थमिल पावर स्ट्टेिन,

डाकघर- सालाकाटी, जिला- काकराझार,

असम - 783369

आरईसी जलजमटेड,

क्षेत्रीय कायािलय, संख्या-12 एवं 13,

टी.एन.एच.बी. कॉम्प्ले‍स, 180, लि चचि रोड,

मैलापुर, चेन्नई, तजमल नाडु - 600004

[फाा. सं. 11011/01/2024-सिंिी]

िीरि कुमार श्रीवास्ट्तव, मुख्य अजभयंता (प्रभारी रािभाषा)

MINISTRY OF POWER

New Delhi, the 5th December, 2024

S.O. 2230.—In pursuance of Sub Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of

the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notify the following offices under the administrative control

of Ministry of Power, wherein 80% of the staff have acquired working knowledge of Hindi:

NHPC Limited

Udi Power Station, Gingal,

Distt- Baramulla,

Jammu & Kashmir – 193122

Energy Efficiency Services Limited,

1st Floor, RMD Building, Lane No-4, Industrial

Estate SICOP, Digiana, Jeevan Nagar,

Jammu – 180004

Energy Efficiency Services Limited

Ground Floor, Behind National School,

Karan Nagar,

Srinagar – 190010

Damodar Valley Corporation,

Maithon Dam Project,

Post: Maithon Dam, Distt- Dhanbad,

Jharkhand – 828207

NTPC Limited,

Bongaigaon Thermal Power Station,

Post Office- Salakati, Distt- Kokrajhar,

Assam - 110003

REC Limited,

Regional Office, No. 12&13, T.N.H.B Complex,

180, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai,

Tamil Nadu - 600004

[F. No. 11011/01/2024-Hindi]

DHIRAJ KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, Chief Engineer (In-Charge O.L.)

संचार मंत्रालय

(डाक जवभाग)

नई दिल्ली, 22 नवम् बर, 2023

का.आ. 2231.—केन् द्र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976 (यथा

संिोजित 1987) के जनयम 10 के उप जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, डाक जवभाग के जनम् नजलजखत अिीनस्ट् थ कायािलय,

जिसके 80 प्रजतित से अजिक अजिकाररयों/कमिचाररयों ने जिन् िी का कायिसािक ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जलया िै, को एतिद्वारा

अजिसूजचत करती िै:-

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 14, 2024/अग्रिायण 23, 1946

5231

पोस्ट्टमास्ट्टर िनरल का कायािलय,

वाराणसी क्षेत्र,

वाराणसी - 221002

[फाा. सं. ई-11017-1/2021-रा.भा.]

मोिफ्फर उद्दीन अब्िाली, उप मिाजनिेिक (ईएमएम /रािभाषा)

MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION

(Department of Posts)

New Delhi, the 22nd November, 2023

S.O. 2231.—In Pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official Purposes of

the Union) Rules 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies following Sub-ordinate office

of the Department of Posts, where more than 80% Officers/Officials have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi: -

Office of the Postmaster General,

Varanasi Division,

Varanasi - 221002

[F. No. E-11017-1/2021-OL]

MOZAFFAR UDDIN ABDALI, Dy. Director General (EMM/OL)

नई दिल्ली, 22 नवम् बर, 2023

का.आ. 2232.—केन् द्र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976 (यथा

अजिसूजचत करती िै:-

पोस्ट्टमास्ट्टर िनरल का कायािलय,

प्रयागराि क्षेत्र,

प्रयागराि - 211001

[फाा. सं. ई-11017-1/2021-रा.भा.]

मोिफ्फर उद्दीन अब्िाली, उप मिाजनिेिक (ईएमएम /रािभाषा)

New Delhi, the 22nd November 2023

S.O. 2232.—In Pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official Purposes of

the Union) Rules 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies following Sub-ordinate office

of the Department of Posts, where more than 80% Officers/Officials have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi: -

Office of the Postmaster General,

Prayagraj Region,

Prayagraj - 211001

[F. No. E-11017-1/2021-OL]

MOZAFFAR UDDIN ABDALI, Dy. Director General (EMM/OL)

नई दिल्ली, 24 नवम् बर, 2024

का.आ. 2233.—केन् द्र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976 (यथा

5232

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 14, 2024/AGRAYANA 23, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

अजिसूजचत करती िै:-

अिीक्षक डाकघर का कायािलय,

िावेरी मंडल,

िावेरी- 581110

[फाा. सं. ई-11017-1/2021-रा.भा.]

मोिफ्फर उद्दीन अब्िाली, उप मिाजनिेिक (ईएमएम /रािभाषा)

New Delhi, the 24th November 2023

S.O. 2233.—In Pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official Purposes of

the Union) Rules 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies following Sub-ordinate office

of the Department of Posts, where more than 80% Officers/Officials have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi: -

Office of the Senior Superintendent of Post Offices,

Haveri Division,

Haveri -581110

[F. No. E-11017-1/2021-OL]

MOZAFFAR UDDIN ABDALI, Dy. Director General (EMM/OL)

नई दिल्ली, 24 नवम् बर, 2023

का.आ. 2234.—केन् द्र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976 (यथा

अजिसूजचत करती िै:-

अिीक्षक डाकघर का कायािलय,

बेलगाजव मंडल,

बेलगाजव- 590001

[फाा. सं. ई-11017-1/2021-रा.भा.]

मोिफ्फर उद्दीन अब्िाली, उप मिाजनिेिक (ईएमएम /रािभाषा)

New Delhi, the 24th November 2023

S.O. 2234.—In Pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official Purposes of

the Union) Rules 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies following Sub-ordinate office

of the Department of Posts, where more than 80% Officers/Officials have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi: -

Office of the Senior Superintendent of Post Offices,

Belgavi Division,

Belgavi – 590001

[F. No. E-11017-1/2021-OL]

MOZAFFAR UDDIN ABDALI, Dy. Director General (EMM/OL)

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 14, 2024/अग्रिायण 23, 1946

5233

नई दिल्ली, 24 नवम् बर, 2023

का.आ. 2235.—केन् द्र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976 (यथा

अजिसूजचत करती िै:-

अिीक्षक डाकघर का कायािलय,

बल्लारी मंडल,

बल्लारी- 583102

[फाा. सं. ई-11017-1/2021-रा.भा.]

मोिफ्फर उद्दीन अब्िाली, उप मिाजनिेिक (ईएमएम /रािभाषा)

New Delhi, the 24th November 2023

S.O. 2235.—In Pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official Purposes of

the Union) Rules 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies following Sub-ordinate office

of the Department of Posts, where more than 80% Officers/Officials have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi: -

Office of the Senior Superintendent of Post Offices,

Ballarii Division,

Ballarii - 583102

[F. No. E-11017-1/2021-OL]

MOZAFFAR UDDIN ABDALI, Dy. Director General (EMM/OL)

नई दिल्ली, 25 नवम् बर, 2024

का.आ. 2236.—औद्योगिक fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 (a1947 dk 14 ) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

बैंक ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V औद्योगिक fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj औद्योगिक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; भुवनेश्वर ds iapkV (a07/2007) izdkf” kr djrh gSA

[सं. ,y - 12012/33/2006- vkbZ vkj (ch-I)]

सलोनी] उप जनिेिक

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 25th November, 2024

S.O. 2236.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref.07/2007) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India

their workmen.

[No. L-12012/33/2006- IR(B-I)]

SALONI, Dy. Director

5234

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 14, 2024/AGRAYANA 23, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR

Present:

Sri Dinesh Kumar Singh,

Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour

Court, Bhubaneswar.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 07/2007

Date of Passing Award – 31^st July, 2024

Between:

The Chief General Manager,

State Bank of India, Local Head Office,

III/1, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru Marg,

Bhubaneswar – 751 001.

…

1^st Party-Management.

(And)

The General Secretary,

State Bank of India Temporary 4^th Grade

Employees Union, Qr. No. Vr-5/1, Unit-III,

Kharvela Nagar, Bhubaneswar.

…

2^nd Party-Union.

Appearances:

Sri Subrat Mishra,

…

For the 1^st Party-

Advocate.

Management

Sri M. Pratap, Advocate. …

For the 2^nd Party-Union.

A W A R D

The Government of India in the Ministry of Labour in exercising its authority conferred by clause (d) of sub-

section (1) and sub-section (2-A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) have referred a

dispute between the Management of State Bank of India, Local Head Office and their workman vide letter No.

L-12012/33/2006 – IR(B- I), New Delhi dated 09.02.2007 for its adjudication and the schedule of the reference is as

follows:-

“Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India, Orissa Circle, Bhubaneswar in not

considering the case of 125 workmen whose details are in Annexure-A for re-employment as per Section 25(H) of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workmen are entitled to?”

The case of the sponsoring Union, SBI Temporary 4^th Grade Union as per the statement of claim is as

follows:-

That, the 2^nd Party-Union under reference (total – 125 workmen) joined their services from 1979 onwards in

different branches of the State Bank of India as messengerial sweepers and they had worked continuously for 240

days in every calendar year of service for a total period of 10 to 15 to 25 years. Further all the workmen had no

adverse remarks against them, but all the workmen under reference had been retrenched from their services with

effect from 30.09.2004 without any notice or compensation in violation of the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act.

A list of all 125 workmen under reference shows names of workmen, their branch, designation, year of joining and

date of refusal/retrenchment from service which is annexed as Annexure-1. After retrenchment of all 125 workmen

from their services, they had requested the Bank-Management for their re-employment but their case was not

considered. In the mean-while several new branches were opened and many 4^th grade employees had been promoted

to the higher grade in different branches, but the Bank-Management had not considered their case. In the mean-time a

number of daily wagers had been allowed to work in different branches but the Bank Management had not

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 14, 2024/अग्रिायण 23, 1946

5235

considered their case for assigning work in the Bank. The concerned 125 workmen under reference had been

victimized by the 1^st Party-Management as being bonafide and active members of the State Bank of India Temporary

4^th Grade Employees Union affiliated to CITU as a result these workmen had been deprived of their consideration by

the Bank-Management. All the concerned workmen have crossed the ag limit of recruitment and they have no chance

of further employment. The Bank-Management has violated the mandatory provisions of Section 25-F of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 read with Section 78 of Industrial Disputes Rules, 1957 by not giving preference of

employment to these 125 workmen whereas new comers, daily wagers and others were allowed to work for years

together. The 1^st Party-Management has also violated the mandatory provisions of Section 25-G of the Industrial

Disputes Act read with Section 77 of the Industrial (Central) Rules, 1957 by not mentioning the list of retrenched

workers on the basis of their seniority in order to victimize these workmen for their Trade Union work. All the 125

concerned workmen involved in this case are sitting idle and are not gainfully employed from the date of their refusal

of employment/retrenchment i.e. 30.09.2004. Some of these workmen were initially given appointment letters by the

respective Branch Managers after taking successful interviews from the sponsored candidates through Employment

Exchange and some of them were appointed directly by respective branches. All the concerned 125 workmen were

not considered for re-employment even after their recommendation by the SBI Staff Association and SBI SC & ST

Employees Welfare Council.

A prayer has been made to answer the reference in favour of the 2^nd party-workmen and to hold that the

action of the Management of State Bank of India, Orissa Circle, Bhubaneswar in not considering the case of these

125 workmen as per 25-H of the Industrial Disputes Act is illegal and unjustified and all the 125 workmen are entitled

for full back wages and continuity of service with effect from 30.09.2004.

On the other hand the case of the 1^st Party-Management namely State Bank of India, Local Head Office,

Bhubaneswar is as follows:-

That the present dispute raised by the Union espousing the cause of 125 persons is false, frivolous, and not

tenable in the eyes of law. Out of 125 workmen under reference good number of workmen had raised Industrial

Dispute before the Asst. Labour Commissioner (Central), Bhubaneswar and subsequently the Bank had filed its

detailed replies as a result this reference was made. The Union had first of all raised the dispute of 61 persons before

the R.L.C. (Central), Bhubaneswar, but subsequently submitted a list of 112 workmen including 61 persons and in

that list the Union had shown different dates of alleged engagement and disengagement of those workmen whereas

uniform date of termination of these workmen had been given under reference which is totally false and in-correct.

The 2^ndparty-Union had no-where mentioned the names and details of such persons who were continuing at different

branches of the 1^st Party-Management in place of 125 workmen as shown in the Annexure-A, so there is no violation

of Section 25-G of the Industrial Disputes Act. On account of administrative exigencies the Bank-Management used

to make temporary engagement as Messengers/Sweepers as and when required at different branches. In view of

finding a permanent solution to the problem of the temporary employees of the Bank, the Bank entered into number

of settlements with the State Bank of India and SBI Staff Federation on 17.11.1987, 16.07.1988, 27.10.1988,

09.01.1991 and 30.07.1996 providing a scheme for creation of messengerial post, identification of vacancies at

various offices, eligibility criteria for considering ex-temporary employees/daily wagers for their permanent

appointment in the Bank and testing their suitability and preparing panels for this purposes. These settlements also

provided that the panels would be used for filling of the vacancies arising up to 31.12.1994 whereas appointment

against such vacancies would be over by 31.03.1997 and thereafter panels would be expired. The Zonal Office of the

Management-Bank prepared a wait list of the candidates found suitable for absorption in descending order of their

temporary services rendered in the Bank in which the disputants were also wait listed, but the said panel expired on

31.03.1997 before their turn came, so they could not be absorbed in the Bank. The disputant workmen had worked

with lesser number of days than the candidates who were absorbed from the panel. After expiry of the panel some of

the persons preferred Writ petition before the Hon’ble High Court of Orissa vide OJC No. 2787/1997 and the Hon’ble

High Court of Orissa dismissed numbers of writ petitions and upheld the action of the Bank. Further the

judgement of Hon’ble High Court of Orissa has been upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India so this matter has

attained finality.

A prayer has been made to answer the reference in favour of the 1^stparty-Management.

After hearing of both the parties and on the basis of pleadings, following issues are framed for adjudication:-

I S S U E S

Whether the reference is maintainable in view of the fact that the individual workmen as mentioned

in the list enclosed to the present reference has made separate references to the same effect?

(ii)

Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India, Orissa Circle, Bhubaneswar in not

considering the case of 125 workmen those details are in Annexure-A for re-employment as per

Section 25-H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified?

(iii)

If not, to what relief the workmen are entitled to?

5236

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 14, 2024/AGRAYANA 23, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

The 2^nd Party-Union has examined three witnesses. They are W.W.-1 Sri Purna Chandra Biswal, W.W.-2 Sri

Sarat Kumar Pradhan & W.W.-3 Sri Panchanan Maharana.

The 2^nd Party-Union has proved following documents which are marked as follows :-

Ext.-1 – Photocopy of the engagement certificate issued by the A.G.M.

Ext.-2 – Photocopy of Order dated 26.10.2018 issued by the C.G.M.

Ext.-3 – Photocopy of the expenses incurred towards engagement of the workman.

Ext.-4 – Photocopy of the interview call letter dated 21.12.1993.

Ext.-5 – Photocopy of the information/particulars submitted by the SBI, dated 12.12.2002.

Ext.-6 – Photocopy of rejection order issued by the Management Bank to the workmen.

Ext.-7 – Photocopy of the certificate of temporary services dated 11.03.1991.

Ext.- 8 – Photocopy of advertisement of the Management Bank published in the Odia daily newspaper.

Ext.-9 – Photocopy of advertisement of the Management Bank published in the Odia daily Newspaper dated

01.05.1991.

Ext.-10 – Photocopy of another advertisement of the Management Bank published in the Odia daily newspaper, dated

20.08.1991.

Ext.-11 – Photocopy of the interview call letter dated 20.12.1993 with token.

Ext.-12 – Photocopy of the Bank Pass Book of Panchanan Moharana.

Ext.-13 – Photocopy of the Bank Pass Book of Panchanan Moharana.

Ext.-14 – Photocopy of petty cash vouchers of the Management.

Ext.-15 – Photocopy of certificate of registration of Trade Unions.

Ext.-16 – Photocopy of letter of Management dated 02.09.2003.

Ext.-17 – Photocopy of the Minutes of discussion.

Ext.-18 – Photocopy of the complaint letter dated 28.02.2005 addressed to the A.L.C(C), Bhubaneswar.

Ext.-19 – Photocopy of the notice issued by the A.L.C (C), Bhubaneswar.

Ext.-20– Photocopy of the letter dated 21.03.2005 to the A.L.C.(C), Bhubaneswar.

Ext.-21 – Photocopy of the failure report dated 28.09.2005 sent to the Ministry.

The 1^st Party-Management has examined only one witness. He is M.W.-1 Sri Nalin Kumar Dash, who is

Chief Manager (HR).

The 1^st Party-Management has proved following documents which are as follows:-

Ext.-A – Photocopy of the minutes of discussion held on 30.05.2007.

Ext.-A/1 – Photocopy of the letter dated 29.06.2007 forwarding therewith the minutes of the meeting to the Ministry

of Finance, Government of India.

Ext.-B – Photocopy of the orders of the Hon’ble High Court of Orissa passed in OJC No. 2787/1987.

Ext.- C – Photocopy of the orders passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court.

Ext.- D – Photocopy of the settlement dated 17.11.1987.

Ext.- E – Photocopy of the settlement dated 16.07.1988.

Ext.- F – Photocopy of the settlement dated 27.10.1988.

Ext.- G – Photocopy of the settlement dated 09.01.1991.

Ext.- H - Photocopy of the settlement dated 30.07.1996.

Ext.- J – Photocopy of the letter dated 02.08.2004.

Ext.-K – Photocopy of the letter dated 22.11.2004 of R.L.C(C), Bhubaneswar.

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 14, 2024/अग्रिायण 23, 1946

5237

F I N D I N G S

The Tribunal thinks it proper to discuss first of all the issue No. II.

ISSUE NO. II

10.

At the outset of the discussion it is required to be mentioned here that it is the case of the 2^nd party-workmen

that 125 number of workmen as per schedule-A of the reference were working in different branches of the State Bank

of India as messengers/sweepers and their services were retrenched/terminated with effect from 30.09.2004 without

any notice and/or compensation though they had worked for a total period of ten to fifteen years. It is the further case

of the 2^nd party-workmen that large number of daily wagers had been allowed to work in different branches but the 1^st

Party-Management had avoided to consider their case so the Management had violated the mandatory provisions of

Section 25-G & 25-H of the Industrial Disputes Act. The 2^nd party-workmen has submitted a list of 125 workmen

mentioning their names, designation, name of the branches, year of joining and date of refusal of employment.

11.

On the other hand, it is the case of the 1^st Party-Management that the 2^nd party-workmen had not mentioned

the name of the such workers who were continuing at different branches of the State Bank of India in place of 125

persons as mentioned in Annexure-A. It is the further case of the 1^st Party-Management that as per the settlement with

All India SBI Staff Federation a panel was prepared for considering the ex-temporary employees/daily wagers for

their permanent appointment in the Bank and consequently the Zona l Office had prepared a wait list of candidates

as per their period of services rendered in the Bank in which the disputants were waitlisted, but the panel expired on

31.03.1997 before The 2^nd party-workmen could not be absorbed.

12.

In the light of the statement of claim of the sponsoring Union and written statement of the Management of

SBI the Tribunal thinks it proper to examine the oral and documentary evidence of both the parties.

13.

The W.W.-1 Sri Purna Chandra Biswal has deposed that he had been working as a 4^th Grade Temporary

Messenger from the year 1991 in State Bank of India Main Branch and from the year 1997 in Commercial Branch. He

has also deposed that from the year 2004 he had worked in the Staff Association of Zonal Office, Bhubaneswar and

he had been continuing till today. He has also stated that the State Bank of India had called for interview for

permanent appointment/absorption of temporary Messenger who were working in different branches under the State

Bank of India in which he had applied for Messenger Post and his name was listed in the panel prepared by the State

Bank of India but the management of State Bank of India gave appointment to some of the workmen and suddenly

rejected the panel without any notice or information. He has also stated that 125 numbers of selected workmen were

sort-listed for absorption but they were not absorbed. He has also stated that all the State Bank of India branches are

engaging workmen in the existing work directly or through contractor services in all the branches, but the

Management refused to engage them. He has proved some documents which are marked as Ext.-1 to Ext.-3.

In the cross examination he has deposed that he is not a member of the Union and he has not been authorized

by the Union to depose before the Tribunal. He has further deposed that this dispute was raised after registration of

the Union in the month of August, 2004. He has further deposed that he is giving evidence on his interest only and he

has not filed any document to show that he was continuing or employed temporarily under the Management of State

Bank of India by the time the dispute was raised. He has denied the suggestion that it is not a fact that 30 persons

were not working under the Management. He has further stated that 15 – 20 persons were on employment. He has

also stated that the Union had not filed any documents showing employment of twenty persons who had worked

under the Management in the relevant period. He has further stated that in November, 2004 the Union had submitted a

list of 125 persons involved in the dispute. He has also stated that as per the settlement in the year 1987, 1988, 1991

and 1996 in between the Union and the Management, interview was held in the year 1990 and 1993 in which three

separate list of candidates were prepared as per performance of the candidates. He has denied the suggestion that he

was not considered for his permanent absorption either for reason of his engagement less than the engaged persons in

the empanelment or due to his poor performance. He has also denied the suggestion that he had no right or cause of

action to raise this dispute as he was not terminated or retrenched workman by the 1^st Party-Management.

14.

The W.W.-2 Sri Sarat Kumar Pradhan in his evidence has deposed that he had been working as 4^th Grade

temporary Messenger in the State Bank of India, IDCO Tower Branch and at Rajpath Evening Branch, Bhubaneswar

from 1991 and he worked for more than 240 days in each year under the C.G.M. State Bank of India, Bhubaneswar.

He has also deposed that he had been called for the interview by the management of State Bank of India for

appointment/absorption in the cadre of 4^th grade Messenger and his name was enlisted in the panel of selection list,

but his appointment in the permanent post was ignored by the Management of State Bank of India. He has also

deposed that the management of State Bank of India had rejected the panel without any notice or information and in

this way seventeen number of 4^th Grade temporary Messengers were deprived from the regular job. He has also stated

that he and all the workmen had continued to work in the Management-Bank up to the year March, 2004, but the

Management disengaged them from work after formation of Union namely SBI 4^th Grade Employees Union. He has

also stated that the Branch Manager of different branches are now engaging new faces for the same work as there is

existing work of Messengers in various branches but he and other workmen are not allowed to work. He has also

5238

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 14, 2024/AGRAYANA 23, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

deposed that he was allowed to continue at SBI Badagada Branch, Bhubaneswar from 2011 to 2016 through service

provider. He has proved some documents which are marked as Ext.-4 to Ext.-6.

In the cross examination he has deposed that he had worked in SBI from 1991 to 2004. He has further

deposed that in the year 1991 he was working in Branch Bank IDCO Tower Branch whereas from 1993 he

worked in Rajpath Evening Branch till 2004. He has further deposed that he had not filed any document except

Ext.-5 series to show that he had worked in the State Bank of India from 1991 to 2004 and his last date of

employment was 30.10.2004. He has also deposed that he had worked in the state Bank of India from 1995 to 1997

for 743 days. He has further stated that he has adduced evidence on behalf of all the workmen. He has further deposed

that he had attended the interview for selection of regular messenger but he was not selected. He has further stated

that the result of the interview was not published. He has further deposed that the Bank had prepared three

panels consisting of Panel-A, Panel-B and Panel-C and his name was at Sl. No. 69. He has also stated that panel of

list was exhausted in the year 1997 and thereafter no recruitment was made by the Management-Bank. He has denied

the suggestion that at the time of registration of Union he was not working in the Bank and he has also denied the

suggestion that on 02.08.2004 he was not working in the State Bank of India. He has also denied the suggestion that

the Management-Bank had not terminated his services and other co-workers, so he had no right to invoke the

provisions of Section 25-G & 25-H of the I.D. Act. He has also denied the suggestion that the Management-Bank had

not recruited other workers after their termination.

15.

W.W.-3 Shri PanchananMaharana has deposed that he was working as temporary messenger under the

Management-Bank of State Bank of India, Main Branch, Bhubaneswar from June, 1990 to 30.09.2004 and in this

regard the Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Main Branch had issued a certificate of his temporary services

from June, 1990 to January 1991. He has also deposed that on the basis of advertisement issued for regular

engagement of daily wagers he had appeared in the interview on 04.01.1994 and his name was enlisted in the panel of

regular absorption/appointment by the management of State Bank of India. He has also deposed that the management

of State Bank of India had issued appointment letters to some of his co-workers and outsiders and subsequently on

31.03.1997 the Management rejected the panel and his services was not absorbed. He has further stated that all 125

number of selected workmen were waiting for absorption under the management of State Bank of India but all of

them were retrenched vide order dated 30.09.2004. He has further deposed that in order to avoid working 240

days of work in a year, he was given sometime cash vouchers directly to avoid the documentation. He has also stated

on 28.05.2004 State Bank of India Temporary 4^th Grade Employees Union was registered. He has further deposed that

the 125 workmen were disengaged without compliance of section 25-N of the I.D. Act as per letter dated 02.09.2003

of AGM SBI, Region-I Zonal Office, Bhubaneswar. He has also further deposed that after disengagement the

workman resorted dharana on 4.10.2004 as a mark of protest and subsequently raised a dispute before the Asst.

Labour Commissioner (Central). He has also deposed that against the regular vacancy, the 1^st Party-Management

without re-employing the 125 number of retrenched workmen as per their seniority has employed other workmen

through service providers. He has also stated that after retirement, about fifteen Messengers were reappointed or re-

engaged in State Bank of India, Main Branch, Bhubaneswar. He has proved documents which are marked as Ext.-7

to Ext.-21.

In the cross examination he has deposed that he has executed vakalatanama in favour of Sri M. Pratap,

Advocate and he in the capacity of the Secretary of the Union is representing on behalf of all the workmen numbering

125. He has deposed that at present he is not working as Messenger under the State Bank of India, Main Branch,

Bhubaneswar. He has also stated that the Union was registered on 28.05.2004. He has also stated that he has filed

documents showing his engagement as daily wage workers and engagement of other members of the union as daily

wage workers. He has denied the suggestion that after exhausting of the panel of selection made in the year 1997 he

and other co-workmen were not engaged in the State Bank of India as daily wage workers. He has denied the

suggestion that after non-selection of himself and other members of the Union they were not working in the

management of State Bank of India. He has also denied the suggestion that the management of State Bank of India

has not engaged other workers through out-sourcing agencies in their place.

16.

M.W. No. 1 Shri Nalini Kumar Dash has deposed that he has been authorized by the Management to depose

in this case. He has also deposed that the Management had employed temporary casual daily wage workers at the

instance of All India State Bank of India Staff Federation. The 1^st Party-Management had entered into some

settlements on 17.11.1987, 16.07.1988, 27.10.1988 and 09.01.1991 for giving opportunity for permanent absorption

of large number of temporary workers working in different branches of the Bank. He had also stated that as per the

settlements three categories namely Category – A, B & C depending upon the number of days worked during given

block period and they were given a chance for being permanently absorbed in the service of Bank. He has also

deposed that on 30.07.1996 another settlement was arrived with the Federation in which it was agreed that all the

panels prepared for temporary employees and daily wagers and casual employees would be kept alive up-to

31.03.1997 for filling up the existing vacancies as on 31.12.1994. He has also deposed that subsequently two

interviews were conducted by the Bank and panels of temporary employees and casual/daily wagers workmen

belonging to different categories like A, B & C were prepared by the Bank. He has also stated that a good number of

people were absorbed permanently in the bank and subsequently both the panels were lapsed on 31.03.1997. He

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 14, 2024/अग्रिायण 23, 1946

5239

has also stated that a large number of unsuccessful employees preferred writ petition in O.J.C. No. 2787/1997 before

the Hon’ble High Court of Orissa and the same was dismissed upholding the validity of the above agreements

entered with the Federation. He has further deposed that one Natabar Das filed S.L.P. before the Hon’ble Supreme

Court vide No. CC-3082/1999 and the Hon’ble Supreme Court dismissed the same on 16.07.1999. He has also stated

that the validity of the above agreements has attained its finality. He has also deposed that the grievance & claim

of the SBI 4^th Grade Temporary Employees Union is unwarranted and being an unrecognised Union cannot raise any

claim in this regard. He has also deposed that the Management had not retrenched/terminated these 125 persons, so

the demand of the Union under section 25-F and 25-H of the I.D. Act does not arise. He has also deposed that the

Bank has not engaged any daily wagers in petty cash/vouchers basis. He has further deposed that the eligible

candidates were called for interview in the year 1990 & 1993 and only selected candidates were given appointment

in the Bank and as the panel of list lapsed on 31.03.1997, the remaining candidates could not be appointed in the

Bank.

In the cross examination he has stated that the selected list with regard to interview conducted was published

on the notice board of SB and the same was also published in the website of the SBI in which some of the 125

workmen under reference were selected. He has deposed that he cannot recall the entire list. He has also deposed that

he cannot say how many persons were called for interview regarding the regular post. He has also deposed that

interview was conducted for the post of Messenger in the SBI. He has also stated that the work done by the casual

workers were subsequently discharged by the Service Provider which were engaged by the Bank for different work.

He has also stated that he cannot say how many persons were engaged by the bank through Service Provider on the

post of Messenger and Group-D post.

17.

Now coming to documentary evidence of workmen it appears that Ext.-1 is the certificate of temporary

service issued by the AGM, SBI, Bhubaneswar to W.W.-1 Sri Purna Chandra Biswal. Further, Ext.-3 shows the

engagement of W.W.-1 Purna Chandra Biswalduring the month of October, 2019 and August, 2020. All these

documents show that the workman Shri Purna Chandra Biswal was engaged by the SBI. Bhubaneswar. Further Ext.-4,

5 & 6 show that the W.W.-2 Shri Sarat Kumar Pradhan, was also engaged by the Management Bank of State

Bank of India. Moreover, Ext.-7, 11, 12, 13 & 14 show the engagement of W.W-3 PanchananMaharana in the State

Bank of India, Bhubaneswar. Further, Ext.-15 is the certificate of registration of Trade Union, Ext.-16 is the

representation of the workmen to the Management, Ext.-17 is the copy of the minutes of discussion, Ext.-18, 19 and

20 are the copies of the letters addressed to A.L.C(C) and Ext.-21 is the failure report sent to the Ministry.

18.

In this case there is a categorical evidence of the sponsoring union/workmen that the Management of SBI in

different branches had engaged regularly all the 125 workmen of this case. However, the Management has disputed

this fact and has claimed that at one stage the Union had claimed 61 workmen and on the other hand had claimed of

112 workmen before the A.L.C(C) regarding the engagement of the workmen. However, Ext.-18 is a latter submitted

to A.L.C.(C), Bhubaneswar by the General Secretary of the sponsoring union in which the names of the 125 workmen

with their names, designation, year o joining & date of refusal of employment were mentioned so the contention

regarding non-engagement of workmen under reference by the management Bank is not convincing.

19.

At this stage it is relevant to mention here that W.W.-1 Purna Chandra Biswal, W.W.-2 Sarat Kumar Pradhan

and W.W.-3 Panchanan Moharana in their evidence before the tribunal have categorically deposed that they and other

workmen under this reference case had been engaged by the SBI in different branches for periods varies from 1991 to

2004. Further the workman witness No. 1 had produced certain documents i.e. Ext.-1, Ext.-2, Ext.-3 regarding his

engagement in the Bank. Further the workman witness No. 2 has also produced certain documents like Ext.-4, Ext.-5

and Ext.-6 showing his engagement in the Bank. Further, the W.W-3 PanchananMoharana has produced Ext.-7,

Ext.-11, Ext.-13 and Ext.-14 showing his engagement in the Bank for the different period. Moreover, W.W.-2 and

W.W.-3 have deposed on behalf of all the concerned workmen regarding their engagement of their services by the

Management of State Bank of India. Further, the evidence of W.W.-1, W.W.-2 and W.W.-3 on the point of

engagement of all the workmen by the Management-Bank till 30.09.2004 has not been impeached in their cross

examination.

20.

However, the Management Witness No. 1 in his evidence has categorically stated that Management Bank

had employed temporary/casual/daily wage workers in the subordinate cadre in its branches/offices at the instance of

All India State Bank of India Staff Federation. Moreover, it is an admission on the part of the Management-Bank that

some of the workmen under reference were called for interview and their names were found place in the lists of

panels prepared by the Management-Bank

21.

In view of the such fact the Tribunal finds and holds that all the 125 concerned workmen were engaged by

the management Bank of SBI for the period mentioned in the Annexure-A of the schedule of reference.

22.

It is also the evidence of concerned workmen that they were terminated/retrenched from the services with

effect from 30.09.2004. However, the Management has denied the termination of these workmen from the

engagement of the Management-Bank.

5240

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 14, 2024/AGRAYANA 23, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

23.

It is important to mention here that the W.W.-1 namely Sri Purna Chanda Biswal, W.W-2 Sarat Chandra

Pradhan and W.W-3 Panchanan Moharana in their evidence have categorically deposed that their engagement was

denied by the Management on 30.09.2004. Moreover, there is nothing in the cross examination to impeach their

testimony on this point. Further Ext.-18 by which the General Secretary has raised the dispute before the A.L.C © has

mentioned the date of termination of the engaged workmen as 30.09.2004.

24.

However, the Management have taken a plea that as per the agreement arrived between the All India Bank

Association Federation and the Bank-management in the year 1987, 1988, 1991 & 1996 regarding permanent

absorption/regularization of messengers and temporary and casual workers engaged in the Bank, the Management-

Bank after conducting interview of all the temporary employees prepared a panel for filling up the vacancies arising

up-to 31.12.1994. It is also the plea of the Management-Bank that a wait list of the candidates found suitable for

absorption in the descending order of their temporary services rendered in the Bank was prepared in which the

disputants were wait-listed, but the said panel was expired on 31.03.1997 before their term came, so they could not be

absorbed in the Bank.

25.

Now it is an admitted position that many of the workmen, who were engaged under the Management of State

Bank of India were absorbed permanently on the basis of interview after preparing panel of the names of those

workmen found in the selection list, but a time limit was fixed for the panel i.e. 31.03.1997. Moreover, panel prepared

by the Management Bank has attained finality as per judgement of the Hon’ble High Court of Orissa passed in OJC

No. 2787/1997.

26.

However W.W.-1, W.W.-2 and W.W.-3 have categorically stated in their evidence that they continued to

work under the management-bank till 30.09.2004. It means that these workmen under reference whose names found

place in the panel of list prepared by the Management-Bank, which lapsed on 31.03.1997 and when these workmen

were not absorbed permanently, they continued to be in engagement in different branches of the Bank till 30.09.2004.

27.

In view of such fact these workmen continued to discharge their duties in different branches of the Bank

after lapse of panel on 31.03.1997 and these workmen were discharged/disengaged/terminated/retrenched without any

valid reason on 30.09.2004.

28.

Now the question arises whether these retrenched/terminated workmen were given opportunity for

reinstatement or not?

In this regard there is categorical evidence of W.W.-1, W.W.-2 and W.W.-3 that in their place Management-

Bank had employed other workmen and they had not been given opportunity of employment.

However, on the other hand it is a case of the Management-Bank that the espousing Union has not mentioned

the name of any workmen employed in place of these workmen.

29.

At this stage it is relevant to mention here that the Management Witness No. 1 Sri Nalini Kumar Das in his

cross examination has stated that the work done by the casual workers were discharged by the Service Providers

and the Service Provides were engaged by the Bank for different work. Now it is the admission on the part of the

Management that the work of casual workers were subsequently discharged by the Service Providers which were

engaged by the Bank but these workmen were not given opportunity to discharge their work which is a violation

of Section 25-H of the Industrial Disputes Act.

30.

At this stage it is proper to mention the provisions of Section 25-G and 25-H of the I.D. Act which are as

follows:-

25-H. – Re-employment of retrenched workmen – Where any workmen are retrenched, and the employer

proposes to take into his employ any persons, he shall, in such manner as may be prescribed, give an opportunity [to

the retrenched workmen who are citizens of India to offer themselves for re-employment, and such retrenched

workmen] who offer themselves for re-employment, shall have preference over other persons.

31.

It is important to mention here that it is the case of the Management that none of the concerned workmen had

completed 240 days of work in a calendar year. In this regard it is relevant to mention here that for attracting the

applicability of section 25-H the workman is not required to prove that he had worked for a period of 240 days during

twelve calendar months preceding the termination of his service or in continuous service within the meaning of

Section 25-B.

32.

In view of the above discussion tribunals finds and holds that the Management has violated the provisions of

Section 25-H of the I.D. Act by not giving opportunities to the workmen to discharge their duties as temporary

messengers and in their place service providers were engaged.

33.

After considering all the facts and circumstances of this case the Tribunal finds and holds that the action of

management of State Bank of India, Bhubaneswar in not considering the case of 125 workmen as per Section 25-H of

the I.D. Act is not legal and justified. Hence, the Issue No. II is answered in favour of the 2^ndparty-Union.

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 14, 2024/अग्रिायण 23, 1946

5241

ISSUE NO. I

34.

With regard to Issue No. I there is no pleadings on behalf of the 1^st Party-Management-bank about the

maintainability of the reference.In view of the fact that separate reference has been made with regard to individual

workmen under this reference. Moreover, the Management have not led any evidence on this point whereas the onus

lies on the Management to prove that the case is not maintainable.

In view of such fact the issue No. I is decided in favour of the sponsoring Union.

ISSUE NO. III

35.

Now it has already been decided by the Tribunal that all the 125 workmen under reference of this case had

been disengaged/terminated/retrenched by the management of state Bank of India, Bhubaneswar unfairly and illegally

on 30.09.2004 and the Bank-Management had employed service providers for discharging duties discharged by all the

125 workmen under the reference which is violation of Section 25-H of the I.D. Act.

36.

Further, in this case twenty years have been elapsed after retrenchment/termination of these workmen, so

many of the workmen would have crossed the age of superannuation or would have been approaching to the age of

superannuation, so the Tribunal thinks it proper to award one time lump sum compensation to all the 125 workmen

instead of their reinstatement under the Management of SBI, Bhubaneswar.

37.

Hence the Management-Bank, State Bank of India, Bhubaneswar is directed to pay a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/-

(Rupees one lakh) to each of the 125 concerned workmen as compensation within one month after publication of

award and if the Management-Bank of State Bank of India fails to pay the compensation amount after one month of

publication of award then all the 125 workmen are entitled for 6.5% of simple interest on the compensation amount.

38.

This is Award of this Tribunal.

Dictated & Corrected by me

DINESH KUMAR SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 4 दिसम् बर, 2024

का.आ. 2237.—औद्योगिक fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 (a1947 dk 14 ) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V औद्योगिक fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj औद्योगिक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;

ds iapkV (a19/2018) izdkf” kr djrh gSA

[सं. ,y - 41012/04/2018- vkbZ vkj (ch-I)]

सलोनी] उप जनिेिक

New Delhi, the 4th December, 2024

S.O. 2237.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref.19/2018) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Jaipur as

shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of North West Railway their workmen.

[No. L-41012/04/2018- IR(B-I)]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ihBklhu vf/kdkjh

jk/kk eksgu prqosZnh

lh-th-vkbZ-Vh- izdj.k la- 19@2018

Reference No. L-41012/04/2018-IR (B-I) Dated: 10.07.2018

Jh guqeku flag uk;d iq= Jh ?khlkth] fuoklh& xkWo >kMksy] ok;k jkelj] rglhy&fd'kux<] ftyk& vtesj]

¼jktLFkku½A

------izkFkhZ

5242

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 14, 2024/AGRAYANA 23, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1- eq[; dk;Z'kkyk izca/kd] ¼yksdks½ uksFkZ osLV jsyos] vtesj] ¼jktLFkku½

-----vizkFkhZx.k@foi{kh

mifLFkr%&

izkFkhZ dh rjQ ls % dksbZ mifLFkr ughaA

vizkFkhZ dh rjQ ls % dksbZ mifLFkr ughaA

1- Je ea=ky; Hkkjr ljdkj ubZ fnYyh }kjk fnukad 10-07-2018 dks vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 dh /kkjk 10

¼1½ ¼Mh½ o 2A ds vUrxZr iznRr 'kfDr;ks ds vuqlj.k esa fuEukafdr vkS|ksfxd fookn U;k; fu.kZ;u gsrq bl

vf/kdj.k dks lanfHkZr fd;k x;k %&

“Whether the action of Chief Workshop Manager (Loco), North West Railway, Ajmer in

terminating the service of Shri Hanuman Singh Nayak S/o Shri Ghisaji, a casual labour in the year 2015

was legal and justified? If not, then to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which

date?”

“Whether the demand of the workman for regularization of this service is justified? If yes, then

from which date. ’’

2- Je ea=ky; }kjk ;g fookn fnukad 10-07-2018 dks iathd`r Mkd }kjk bl vf/kdj.k ds lkFk lkFk fookn ds

i{kdkjksa ;Fkk izkFkhZ laxBu o foi{khx.k dks Hkh izsf"kr fd;k x;k FkkA ;g fookn fnukad 28-09-2018 dks bl

vf/kdj.k esa izkIr gqvk&rFkk i{kdkjksa dh milatkfr o vfHkopuksa dh izrh{kk esa vc rd yafcr jgk gSA vkt

fnukad 03-09-2024 rd Hkh bl lanfHkZr fookn ds vxzlj.k gsrq izkFkhZ us vius nkos dk vfHkdFku izLrqr ugha fd;k

gSA Je ea=ky; }kjk lanfHkZr fookn ds laca/k esa fookn izLrqr djus okys i{kdkj ¼izkFkhZ½ dks ;g funsZ'k fn;k x;k

gS fd og mDr vkns'k dh izkfIr ds 15 fnu dh vof/k esa vius nkos dk vfHkdFku bl vf/kdj.k ds le{k izLrqr

djsA pwfda izkFkhZ dks ;g vkns'k iathd`r Mkd ds ek/;e ls izsf"kr fd;k x;k gS] ;g mi/kkfjr fd;k tkuk furkar

U;k;ksfpr gS fd& ftl izdkj bl vf/kdj.k dks lanfHkZr vkns'k 28-09-2018 dks izkIr gks pqdk gS& izkFkhZ dks Hkh

;g vkns'k izkIr gks pqdk gksxkA

3- bl rF;kRed ifjn`’; esa bl vf/kdj.k dk ;g lqfopkfjr vf/ker gS fd izkFkhZ o foi{khx.k ds e/; lanfHkZr

fookn ds vxzlj.k gsrq izkFkhZ&i{k vfuPNqd o mnklhu gSA blfy, nkos ds vfHkdFku ds vHkko esa izkFkhZ lanfHkZr

fookn esa dksbZ vuqrks"k ikus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA

4- lanfHkZr fookn dk fuLrkj.k blh izdkj fd;k tkrk gSA

5- vf/kfu.kZ; dh izfrfyfi vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 dh /kkjk 17 ¼1½ ds vuqlj.k esa izdk’kukFkZ izsf"kr dh

tkosaA

jk/kkeksgu prqosZnh] ihBklhu vf/kdkjh

नई दिल्ली, 9 दिसम् बर, 2024

का.आ. 2238.—औद्योगिक fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 (a1947 dk 14 ) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V औद्योगिक fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj औद्योगिक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;

ds iapkV (a49/2021) izdkf” kr

djrh gSA

[सं. ,y - 41012/20/2021- vkbZ vkj (ch-I)]

सलोनी] उप जनिेिक

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 14, 2024/अग्रिायण 23, 1946

5243

New Delhi, the 9th December, 2024

S.O. 2238.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref.49/2021) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Jaipur as

shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Nuclear Power Corporation of India

Limited their workmen.

[No. L-41012/20/2021- IR(B-I)]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ihBklhu vf/kdkjh

jk/kk eksgu prqosZnh

lh-th-vkbZ-Vh- izdj.k la- 49@2021

Reference No. L-42012/20/2021-IR (DU) Dated: 16.08.2021

egklfpo] jktLFkku v.kq'kfDr ifj;kstuk deZpkjh la?k ¼baVd½ jkorHkkVk] ftyk& fpRrksM+] ¼jktLFkku½A

------izkFkhZ

1- izca/kra=] dsUnz funs'kd] U;wfDy;j ikoj dkiksZjs'ku vkWQ bafM;k fyfeVsM] jkorHkkVk jktLFkkku lkbV] bdkbZ 5 ,oa

6] iksLV v.kq'kfDr 323303 ok;k dksVk ftyk& fpRrkSM+] ¼jktLFkku½ 312001

-----vizkFkhZx.k@foi{kh

mifLFkr%&

izkFkhZ dh rjQ ls % dksbZ mifLFkr ughaA

vizkFkhZ dh rjQ ls % dksbZ mifLFkr ughaA

1- Je ea=ky; Hkkjr ljdkj ubZ fnYyh }kjk fnukad 16-08-2021 dks vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 dh /kkjk 10

¼1½ ¼Mh½ o 2A ds vUrxZr iznRr 'kfDr;ks ds vuqlj.k esa fuEukafdr vkS|ksfxd fookn U;k; fu.kZ;u gsrq bl

vf/kdj.k dks lanfHkZr fd;k x;k %&

“

?”

2- Je ea=ky; }kjk ;g fookn fnukad 16-08-2021 dks iathd`r Mkd }kjk bl vf/kdj.k ds lkFk lkFk fookn ds

i{kdkjksa ;Fkk izkFkhZ laxBu o foi{khx.k dks Hkh izsf"kr fd;k x;k FkkA ;g fookn fnukad 01-09-2021 dks bl

vf/kdj.k esa izkIr gqvk&rFkk i{kdkjksa dh milatkfr o vfHkopuksa dh izrh{kk esa vc rd yafcr jgk gSA vkt

fnukad 04-09-2024 rd Hkh bl lanfHkZr fookn ds vxzlj.k gsrq izkFkhZ us vius nkos dk vfHkdFku izLrqr ugha fd;k

gSA Je ea=ky; }kjk lanfHkZr fookn ds laca/k esa fookn izLrqr djus okys i{kdkj ¼izkFkhZ½ dks ;g funsZ'k fn;k x;k

gS fd og mDr vkns'k dh izkfIr ds 15 fnu dh vof/k esa vius nkos dk vfHkdFku bl vf/kdj.k ds le{k izLrqr

djsA pwfda izkFkhZ dks ;g vkns'k iathd`r Mkd ds ek/;e ls izsf"kr fd;k x;k gS] ;g mi/kkfjr fd;k tkuk furkar

5244

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 14, 2024/AGRAYANA 23, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

U;k;ksfpr gS fd& ftl izdkj bl vf/kdj.k dks lanfHkZr vkns'k 01-09-2021 dks izkIr gks pqdk gS& izkFkhZ dks Hkh

;g vkns'k izkIr gks pqdk gksxkA

3- bl rF;kRed ifjn`’; esa bl vf/kdj.k dk ;g lqfopkfjr vf/ker gS fd izkFkhZ o foi{khx.k ds e/; lanfHkZr

fookn ds vxzlj.k gsrq izkFkhZ&i{k vfuPNqd o mnklhu gSA blfy, nkos ds vfHkdFku ds vHkko esa izkFkhZ lanfHkZr

fookn esa dksbZ vuqrks"k ikus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA

4- lanfHkZr fookn dk fuLrkj.k blh izdkj fd;k tkrk gSA

5- vf/kfu.kZ; dh izfrfyfi vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 dh /kkjk 17 ¼1½ ds vuqlj.k esa izdk’kukFkZ izsf"kr dh

tkosA

jk/kkeksgu prqosZnh] ihBklhu vf/kdkjh

नई दिल्ली, 9 दिसम् बर, 2024

का.आ. 2239.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 (a1947 dk 14 ) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V औद्योजगक

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;

ds iapkV (a57/2020) izdkf” kr djrh gSA

[सं. ,y - 12025/01/2024- vkbZ vkj (ch-I)-243]

सलोनी] उप जनिेिक

New Delhi, the 9th December, 2024

S.O. 2239.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref.57/2020) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. - II

Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of ICICI Bank Ltd. and their

workmen.

[No. L-12025/01/2024- IR(B-I)-243]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL-TRIBUNAL CUM-LABOUR COURT NO-II, NEW DELHI

I.D. No. 57/2020

Smt. Pinki, W/o Sh. Anil Kumar,

Through – Delhi Karamchari Sangh,

W-4, Infront of Kalkaji Bus Depot,

Govindpuri, New Delhi-110019.

Versus

ICICI Bank Ltd.

S-26, 27, 28, Greenpark Extensions,

Vera Tower, New Delhi-110016.

Care Facilities Management Services Pvt. Ltd.

KHIL House, 2^nd Floor, 70/C, Nehru Road,

Nest to the Orchid Hotel, Vile Parle (East),

Mumbai-400009

AWARD

This is the claim U/s 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 (herein after referred as an Act) filed by the

workwoman after approaching the conciliation officer where efforts for conciliation have been failed. Workman in

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 14, 2024/अग्रिायण 23, 1946

5245

her claim statement has stated that she was appointed by the management-2 on the post of House Keeping on

17.10.2016 and her last drawn wages was Rs. 14516/- Per month. Management-2 did not issue any appointment letter

to the workman. M-2 had deputed to workman in the management-1. She used to work sincerely, honestly. Her

service record was clean. M-2 used to take work twelve hours per day from her, but the management did not pay any

overtime wages. Management-1 did not issue any appointment letter, leave book, causal leave, pay slip, HRA etc. She

used to demand to the same from the management-1 and 2 to provide the above said facilities, but the management

inspite of giving assurance did not pay any heed to her demand. On 25.01.2019 the management-2 had illegally

terminated the workwoman from her services on the direction of management-1, without any rhyme or reason. Hence,

he filed the present complaint.

Notice of this claim petition had been issued. Management-1 had not turned up. He was proceeded ex-parte

vide order dated 4.05.2022. Management-2 filed the reply/written statement to the claim petition.

Management-2 has taken various preliminary objection stating that the claim of the claimant is ill-

conceived, misconceived and untenable and is liable to be dismissed. Claim has been filed in order to extort money,

however, he has admitted that claimant is the employee, but stated that the claimant did not adhere discipline and it

has received various complaint of the workwoman. For this claimant was granted several opportunities to improve,

but every time instead of mending her ways, she misused her position and committed further acts of misconduct. On

24.01.2019, claimant was advised to report at Jhandewalan Branch of ICICI Bank, but she failed to do so. She was

sent whatsapp messages dated 27.01.2019, 30.01.2019 and 01.02.2019, but despite the same she neither reported for

work, nor reply to the said messages. She remained absent unauthorisedly from duty from 25.01.2019. It is submitted

that in as much as there is not termination of service because the claimant is having remained absent from duties

w.e.f. 25.01.2019 left the job of her own.

After completion of the pleadings following issues have been framed vide order dated 03.08.2022 which are

given below:-

1. Whether the proceedings is maintainable.

2. Whether there exist any employer and employee relationship between the management-1 and the

claimant.

3. Whether the service of the claimant was terminated illegally or for the misconduct shows by the

claimant.

4. To what other relief the claimant is entitled to.

In order to prove her claim, workwoman had examined herself as WW1.

In her affidavit of evidence, she had reiterated the averment made in the claim petition stating that she was

appointed by the M-2 at the post of House Keeping on 17.10.2016 at the last drawn wages was Rs. 14,516/- per

month. She was illegally terminated on 25.01.2019. She had relied upon seven documents i.e. Copy of complaint to

ALC, copy of demand notice dated 26.02.2019, copy of complaint to RLC, copy of rejoinder, copy of pay slip,

original failure report dated 30.12.2019, copy of I-card. Workwoman had not been cross-examined.

In order to prove his case, the claimant firstly had to prove that he is a workman, he worked in an industry, an

industrial dispute arises and he was terminated for this reason. For this, section 2(S), 2 (J & K) and section 2 (OO) are

required to be reproduced.

Section 2 (s) of the Industrial Disputes Act define the workman, it reads as under:

“Workman” means any person (including an apprentice) employed in any industry to do any

manual, unskilled, skilled, technical, operational, clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward,

whether the terms of employment be express or implied, and for the purposes of any proceeding

under this Act in relation to an industrial dispute, includes any such person who has been

dismissed, discharged or retrenched in connection with, or as a consequence of that dispute, or

whose dismissal, discharge, or retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such

person-

(i)

who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or

the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62

of 1957); or

(ii)

who is employed in the police service or as an officer or

other employee of a prison; or

(iii)

who is employed mainly in a managerial or administrative

capacity; or

5246

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 14, 2024/AGRAYANA 23, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(iv)

who, being employed in a supervisory capacity, draws

wages exceeding [ten thousand rupees] per mensem or

exercises, either by the nature of the duties, attached to

the office o by reason of the powers vested in him,

functions mainly of a managerial nature.]

Section 2 (j, k& oo) of the I.D Act define the industry and industrial disputes

respectively. It reads as under:

[(j)] “industry” means any business, trade, undertaking, manufacture or calling

of employers and includes any calling, service, employment, handicraft, or

industrial occupation or avocation of workmen;

(k)

“industrial dispute” means any dispute or difference between employers

and employers or between employers and workmen, or between workmen

and workmen, which is connected with the employment or non-

employment or the terms of employment or with the conditions of labour,

of any person;

(oo)

“retrenchment” means the termination by the employer of the

service of a workman for any reason whatsoever, otherwise than as

a punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary action, but does not

include-

(a)

Voluntary retirement of the workman; or

(b)

Retirement of the workman on reaching the age of superannuation

if the contract of employment between the employer and the

workman concerned contains a stipulation in that behalf; or

[(bb)]

termination of the service of the workman as a result of the non-

renewal of the contract of employment between the employer and

the workman concerned on its expiry or of such contract being

terminated under a stipulation in that behalf contained therein; or

(c)

termination of the service of a workman on the ground of

continued ill-health;

Now, come to the case in hand, claimant has claimed to have been working with Respondent-1 through

respondent-2, the contractor Care Facilities Management Services Pvt. Ltd as House Keeping. She had led the

evidence also to that effect that she had been working with the respodent-1 as House Keeping through respondent-2. In

the evidence, she did not seek any relief against respondent-1. Her case is that her services have been terminated by

respondent-2 from 25.01.2019. The above testimony of the workwoman remained unchallenged, unrebutted and

uncontroverted, because the management-2 has not come for cross-examining the witness.

She had proved from the above said testimony that she is a workwoman and she worked with Care Facilities

Management Services Pvt. Ltd. who used to offer services to the government institution, therefore, the respondent-2

is an industry. Her further contention is that her services has been terminated without any rhyme and reason, therefore,

industrial disputes has been arisen.

Facts culled from the evidence, which the workwoman has led is that her services has been terminated.

Respondent-2 who had appeared and filed the reply and taken the defence that workwoman remained absent from

25.01.2019 and he had given whatsapp messages to the workwoman dated 27.01.2019, 30.01.2019 and 01.02.2019 for

joining the duty, but, she had not come. However, neither the management had cross-examined workwoman to this

aspect nor led any evidence contrary to this effect.

From the above discussion, workwoman has proved that she had worked as workman with respondent-2 and

her services have been terminated illegally as no notice pay or retrenchment compensation has either been offered or

given. Not only she had proved that his petition is maintainable but also she had proved that her services have been

terminated illegally, therefore, issued no.-1, 2 & 3 has been answered accordingly.

ISSUE No. 4: What relief, the claimant is entitled and be given.

Workwoman claims that she be given reinstatement of service with full back wages with respondent-2 since

the date of his termination, she is jobless. She has been undergoing with financial crisis. The testimony of this witness

is unchallenged as the management-1 had not cross-examined him that she has been doing job, therefore, there is no

doubt left in the mind of the court/tribunal that the workman has got any job.

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 14, 2024/अग्रिायण 23, 1946

5247

Admittedly, workman had worked for more than three years with management-2. Normally, when services of

the workman were terminated, naturally, reinstatement with full back wages would follow. However, in recent past,

there has been a shift in the legal position and long line of cases decided by the constitutional court that relief of

reinstatement with full back wages is not automatic and maybe fully inappropriate where the workman worked only for

a year or two. However, it depends upon case to case where the relief of reinstatement has to be given.

Here in the present case, workwoman at the time of filing the evidence was almost 44 years old, she had not

given the list of any family member dependent upon him. So, this tribunal is not inclined to give the relief of

reinstatement. It would be better if the lump sum amount is given to the workman in lieu of reinstatement. In these

circumstances, amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only) is an appropriate relief in lieu of his illegal

termination. Respondent-2 is directed to pay the amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only) to the workwoman.

Award is accordingly passed. Copy of this award is sent to the appropriate government for notification as required U/s

17 of the I.D. Act. This file is consigned to record room.

ATUL KUMAR GARG, Presiding Officer

Date 20, June, 2024

नई दिल्ली, 10 दिसम् बर, 2024

का.आ. 2240.—औद्योगिक fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 (a1947 dk 14 ) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V औद्योगिक fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj औद्योगिक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;

ds iapkV (a12/2011) izdkf” kr djrh gSA

[सं. ,y - 12012/81/2010- vkbZ vkj (ch-II)]

सलोनी] उप जनिेिक

New Delhi, the 10th December, 2024

S.O. 2240.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref.12/2011) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Jaipur as

shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Bank of Baroda and their workmen.

[No. L-12012/81/2010- IR(B-II)]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ihBklhu vf/kdkjh

jk/kk eksgu prqosZnh

Reference No. L-12012/81/2010-IR(B-II) Dated:11.05.2011

Jh jes'k pUnz jMky iq= Jh efM+;kth jMky] fuoklh& ubZ vkcknh] rglhy& ckxhnkSjk ftyk& ckalokMk] jktLFkku

---------izkFkhZ

1- 'kk[kk izca/kd] cSad vkWQ cMkSnk] iksLV& lTtux<] rglhy& dq'kkyx<] ftyk& ckalokMk ¼jktLFkku½

2- mi egkizca/kd] cSad vkWQ cMkSnk] {ks=h; dk;kZy;] mn;iqj ¼jktLFkku½

-----vizkFkhZ@foi{kh

mifLFkr%&

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls % dksbZ mifLFkr ughaA

vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls % Jh :fiu ds- dkyk] vfHkHkk"kdA

5248

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 14, 2024/AGRAYANA 23, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

1- Je ,oa fu;kstu ea=ky; Hkkjr ljdkj ubZ fnYyh }kjk fnukad 11-05-2011 dks vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947

¼ftls vkxs ek= vf/kfu;e dgk tk;sxk½ dh /kkjk 10 ¼1½ ¼Mh½ ,oa 2A ds vUrxZr iznRr 'kfDr;ks ds vuqlj.k esa

fuEukfdr vkS|ksfxd fookn U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq bl vf/kdj.k dks lanfHkZr fd;k x;k %&

“Whether the action of the management of Bank of Baroda in terminating the services of Sh.

Ramesh Chandra Radal S/o Sh. Madiyaji Radal w.e.f. 01.11.2008, is legal and justified? What relief the

workman is entitled and from which date?’’

2- fnukad 12-09-2011 dks izkFkhZ dh vksj ls nkos dk vfHkdFku izLrqr djrs gq;s ;g dgk x;k gS fd izkFkhZ us o"kZ

1999 ls 2001 rd foi{kh ds v/khu lQkbZ dehZ ds :Ik esa vfu;fer :Ik ls lsok;s nhA 4 vizsy] 2001 ls 31-10-

2008 rd fujarj foi{kh la[;k&1 dh 'kk[kk esa lQkbZ dehZ ds :Ik esa dk;Zjr jgk gSA foi{khx.k us Hkh ;g

Lohdkj fd;k gS fd izkFkhZ us fnukad 01-05-2001 ls 15-09-2007 rd fu;fer lsok;s nhA rRi'pkr LosPNk ls dk;Z

NksM dj pyk x;k foi{khx.k dk ;g dFku vlR; gSA izkFkhZ dks ekSf[kd vkns'k ls lsoki`Fkd dj fn;k x;k vkSj

izkFkhZ ds LFkku ij ,d vU; deZpkjh iz’kkUr dks fu;qDr fd;k x;kA mieq[; Je vk;qDr ¼dsUnzh;½ eqEcbZ ds

le{k fnukad 18-03-2008 dks foi{kh izca/ku vkSj dkexkjksa ds izfrfuf/k;ksa ds e/; vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 12 ¼3½ ds

varxZr f=i{kh; le>kSrk lEiUu gqvk FkkA izkFkhZ Hkh ml le>ksrs dh ifjf/k esa vkrk gS fdarq foi{khx.k us izkFkhZ

dks lsok esa cgky u djds le>kSrs dh vogsyuk dh gSA vr% okn Lohdkj dj izkFkhZ dks foxr osru] ifjykHkkksa

,oa lsok esa fujarjrk lfgr iqu% inLFkkfir fd;k tkosA

3- foi{kx.k dh vksj ls fnukad 21-08-2012 dks oknksRrj izLrqr djrs gq;s ;g dgk x;k gS fd foi{kh cSad ,d

lafof/kd fudk; gS ftlesa fu;qfDr gsrq fu’fpr izfdz;k vkSj fu;e gSA izkFkhZ dks 'kk[kk izca/kd }kjk vius Lrj ij

tc&tc dk;Z dh vfr vko';drk gqbZ nSfud osru Hkksxh deZpkjh ds :Ik esa dk;Z fy;k x;kA vkSj dk;Z ds

vuq:Ik vius Lrj ij gh 'kk[kk }kjk Hkqxrku fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ 2 ?kUVs ds fy;s lkQ lQkbZ dk dk;Z djus ds

fy;s vkrk FkkA izkFkhZ dks LFkkbZ fu;qfDr izkIr djus dk dksbZ vf/kdkj ugha mRiUu ugha gksrkA fnuakd 15-09-2007

dks izkFkhZ vafre ckj foi{kh cSad esa dk;Z djus gsrq mifLFkr gqvk mlds ckn dk;Z ij vkuk can dj fn;kA izkFkhZ us

viuh lsokeqfDr frfFk 01-11-2008 n’kkZ;h gS tks feF;k gSA D;ksfd fnukad 15-09-2007 ds ckn izkFkhZ Lo;a gh dk;Z

djus ugha vk;kA ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd f=i{kh; le>kSrk fnukad 18-03-2008 ds varxZr fu;qfDr ikus ds mns';

ls xyr lsok lekfIr frfFk n'kkZ;h xbZ gSA le>kSrs esa ;g mYys[k gS fd le>kSrs dh frfFk ds fnu ml O;fDr

dk foi{kh dh fdlh 'kk[kk esa nsfud osru Hkksxh@vkdfLed deZpkjh ds :Ik esa dk;Zjr gksuk vko’;d gSA pwafd

izkFkhZ fnuakd 15-09-2007 ds ckn foi{kh cSad dh fdlh 'kk[kk esa dk;Zjr ugha jgk] blfy;s le>kSrs ds izko/kku

izkFkhZ ij ykxw ugha gSA vr% okn fujLr fd;k tkosA

4- fnuakd 23-01-2013 dks izkFkhZ dh vksj ls foi{kh ds onksRrj dk [k.Mu djrs gq;s le>kSrs dh 'krZ la[;k&2 o 3

dh vksj /;ku vkd`"V fd;k x;k vkSj okn dks Lohdkj djus dk vkxzg fd;k x;kA

5- izkFkhZ us vius lk{; esa Lo;a izkFkhZ jes'k pUnz jMky dks ijhf{kr fd;k vkSj dksbZ izys[k iznf'kZr ugha fd;kA

6- foi{kh dh vksj ls muds lk{; esa Hkxoku lgk; egkoj] 'kk[kk izca/kd dks ijhf{kr fd;k x;k rFkk izys[kh; lk{;

esa izn'kZ M&1 vkSj izn'kZ M&2 izys[k iznf'kZr fd;s x;sA

7- fnukad 22-04-2015 dks izkFkhZ dh vksj ls fyf[kr rdZ izLrqr fd;s x;s gS ftudh izfr foi{kh dks miyC/k djok nh

xbZA fdarq foi{kh dh vksj ls dksbZ fyf[kr rdZ [k.Mu Lo:Ik izLrqr ugha fd;a x;s oju~ fnukad 04-09-2024 dks

vfHkHkk"kd foi{kh us vius ekSf[kd rdZ izLrqr fd;sA

8- izkFkhZ us vius fyf[kr rdksZ esa ;g dgk gS fd fnukad 01-05-2001 ls fnukad 15-09-2007 rd izkFkhZ }kjk foi{kh ds

v/khu lsok fd;k tkuk vkSj fnukad 16-09-2007 ls iz'kkUr uked O;fDr dk dk;Z izkjaEHk djuk izekf.kr gSA foi{kh

us lksph le>h ;kstuk ds rgr fnukad 15-09-2007 dks izkFkhZ dks gVk;k vkSj nwljs gh fnu iz'kkUr uked O;fDr

dks dk;Z ij yxk;kA izkFkhZ us 6 ½ o"kZ rd fujarj dk;Z djus ds ckn ;fn lsok dk ifjR;kx fd;k rks fu;kstd

us mlds fo:} dksbZ vuq'kklfud dk;Zokgh D;ks ugha dhA lsokeqfDr ds iwoZ vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 F dk ikyu

D;ks ugha fd;kA lsokeqfDr frfFk ds iwoZ fdlh Hkh ,d o"kZ esa 240 fnu dk dk;Z dj ysus ij Jfed dks /kkjk 25

F ds izko/kkuksa dk laj{k.k izkIr gks tkrk gSA bl izdkj izkFkhZ us fnukad 04-04-2001 ls 15-09-2007 rd vf/kfu;e

dh /kkjk 25 B ds varxZr fujarj lsok dk rF; izekf.kr fd;k gSA vr% okn Lohdkj fd;k tkosA

9- mUgksaus vius fyf[kr rdZ ds lkFk fuaEukfdr U;kf;d n`"Vakr izLrqr fd;sA

LVsV vkWQ mRrjkapy cuke cyjke flag 2004 ¼101½ FLR 1045

Tkh-Vh-vkj-Vh- lsUVj csaxyksj cuke dfj;Iik ¼e`rd½ }kjk fof/kd izfrfuf/k 2010 ¼124½ FLR 268

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 14, 2024/अग्रिायण 23, 1946

5249

gjftUnj flag cuke iatkc LVsV os;j gkmflax dksiZ- 2010 ¼124½ FLR 700 ¼lqizhe dksVZ½

;wfu;u vkWQ bafM;k cuke t;jkt ,u- 'ksVVh 2003 ¼99½ FLR 671 ¼cEcbZ mPp U;k;ky;½

dqynhi flag cuke th-,u-vkbZ-Mh-Mh- ,.M ,Q- lsUVj 2011 ¼128½ FLR 121 ¼lqizhe dksVZ½

vtkbc flag cuke ljfgUn dksijsfVo ekdsZfVax de izkslsflax lfoZl lqlkbVh fyfe- 1999 ¼82½ FLR 137

¼lqizhe dksVZ½

egkohj flag cuke ;w-ih- LVsV bysDVªhflVh cksMZ 1999 ¼82½ FLR 169 ¼lqizhe dksVZ½

lqizhUVsaMsaV mEesn gkWLihVy tks/kiqj cuke tt b.MLVªh;y fVªC;quy 2011 ¼130½ FLR 955 ¼jktLFkku½

lqjs'k pUnz cuke uxj ikfydk jktlean 2011 ¼130½ FLR 180 ¼jktLFkku½

10- LVsV vkWQ fcgkj cuke xtk/kj flag 2011 ¼130½ FLR 132 ¼iVuk½

10- vfHkHkk"kd foi{kh us vius rdksZ esa eq[;r% ;g dgk gS fd izkFkhZ dh fu;qfDr fdlh p;u izfdz;k ds varxZr

fof/kor cSad }kjk ugha dh xbZA izkFkhZ us fnukad 15-09-2007 ds ckn foi{kh cSad dh fdlh Hkh 'kk[kk esa dk;Z ugha

fd;kA izkFkhZ us f=i{kh; le>kSrs ds izko/kkuksa dk feF;k vk/kkjksa ij ykHk mBkus ds fy;s mldh lsok lekfIr frfFk

01-11-2008 of.kZr dj nh gS tks fdlh Hkh lk{; ls lefFkZr ugha gSA tc izkFkhZ le>kSrs dh frfFk 18-03-2008 dks

foi{kh dh lsok esa dk;Zjr gh ugha Fkk tks fd le>kSrs dks ykxw djus dh ,d vko';d 'krZ Fkh] rks izkFkhZ dks

le>kSrs ds v/khu fopkfjr gh ugh fd;k tk ldrk FkkA izkFkhZ us fnukad 15-09-2007 ls 31-10-2008 rd dk;Z

djus ds laca/k esa dksbZ izys[k izLrqr ugha fd;k gSA fdlh nwljs O;fDr dks izkFkhZ ds mijkar fu;qDr fd;s tkus dk

rF; Hkh izkFkhZ us iq"V ugha fd;k gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr lk{; mlds i{k esa lgk;d ugha gS vkSj u

gh izLrqr fd;s x;s fu.kZ;ksa esa ikfjr dh xbZ fof/k lgk;d gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd lsok lekfIr dh frfFk

tks fd jsQjsal vkns'k esa 01-11-2008 gS] ds laca/k esa gh vf/kdj.k dks U;k;fu.kZ;u djuk gS fnukad 15-09-2007 dks

lsok lekfIr frfFk ekurs gq;s ughaA vr% okn fujLr fd;k tkosA

11- eSaus izkFkhZ i{k ds fyf[kr rdksZ ,oa foi{kh ds ekSf[kd rdksZ ,oa miyC/k lk{; ds laca/k esa /;ku iwoZd euu fd;kA

bl fookn esa fuEukafdr fopkj.kh; fcUnq mRiUu gq;s gS%&

1- D;k izkFkhZ fnukad 31-10-2008 rd foi{khx.k ds v/khu lQkbZ dehZ ds :Ik esa dk;Zjr jgk rFkk mlus lsok

lekfIr ds iwoZorhZ ,d dys.Mj o"kZ esa 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z fd;kA blfy;s izkFkhZ dks vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk

25 F ds izko/kkuksa dk vuqikyu fd;s fcuk lsokeqDr fd;k tkuk voS/k gS\

-----------------izkFkhZ

2- D;k foi{khx.k }kjk izkFkhZ dks lsokeqDr djrs le; izkFkhZ ls dfu"Brj O;fDr dks lsok esa j[krs gq;s izkFkhZ dks

ojh;rk ugha nh xbZ\

-----------------izkFkhZ

3- D;k izkFkhZ f=i{kh; le>ksrs fnukad 18-03-2008 ds izko/kkuksa dk ykHk izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh gS\

-----------------izkFkhZ

4- vuqrks"k\

12- fopkj.kh; fcUnqvksa ij dzfed fofu'p; bl izdkj gS%&

14- izkFkhZ jes'k pUnz jMky us vius 'kiFk i= esa ;g dgk gS fd mlus vizsy] 2001 ls 31-10-2008 rd foi{kh

la[;k&1 ds v/khu lQkbZ deZpkjh ds in ij viuh lsok;s nhA izkFkhZ dk vkxkeh dFku gS fd rRdkyhu 'kk[kk

izca/kd Jh egsUnz iztkir us fnukad 01-11-2008 ls ekSf[kd vkns'k ds }kjk mls lsoki`Fkd dj fn;kA izkFkhZ us

viuh izfrijh{kk esa ;g dgk gS fd 2001 ls 2008 rd yxkrkj dke djus dk dkxt nkf[ky fd;k gSA mlus

lwph esa dkxtkr 1 yxk;r 12 is'k fd;s gSaA ysfdu blds rqjar ckn gh izkFkhZ us ;g Hkh Lohkdj fd;k gS fd

mlus bu vfHkys[kksa dks iznf'kZr ugha djk;k gS vkSj 'kiFk i= esa Hkh bu vfHkys[kksa dk mYys[k ugha fd;k gSA bl

fLFkfr esa izkFkhZ us 2001 ls 2008 rd foi{kh ds v/khu dk;Z djus ds laca/k esa ftu izys[kksa dks i=koyh esa lwph

lfgr izLrqr fd;k gS mu izys[kksa dks izkFkhZ us u rks vius l’kiFk dFku ¼eq[; ijh{kk½ esa lekfgr fd;k vkSj u gh

mu izys[kksa dks lk{; esa iznf'kZr fd;kA

15- eSaus i=koyh esa layXu bu lwphc} izys[kksa dh QksVks izfr;kW dk U;k;fgr esa voyksdu fd;k rks ;g ik;k fd bu

izys[kksa esa jsQjsal vkns'k] fjDr inksa dh vf/klwpuk rFkk izkFkhZ ds 2003 rd dk;Z djus laca/kh cSad dk i=] izkFkhZ

dk vkosnu] oS;fDrd fooj.k vkSj ebZ] 2007 rd izkFkhZ ls lacaf/kr dfri; Hkqxrku vfHkys[k lfEefyr gaSA fu"d"kZ

;g gS fd ;s izys[k 31-10-2008 rd izkFkhZ ds dk;Zjr jgus ds rF; dks fdlh izdkj iq"V ugha djrs gSaA fnukad

5250

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 14, 2024/AGRAYANA 23, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

15-09-2007 rd izkFkhZ }kjk dk;Z fd;k tkuk foi{kh us bl 'krZ lfgr Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mlus le;≤ ij

bl vof/k esa dk;Z fd;kA fnukad 15-09-2007 ds mijkar izkFkhZ Lo;a }kjk dk;Z NksM dj pys tkus dk rF; foi{kh

us cyiowoZd izLrqr fd;k gSA bl fLFkfr esa izkFkhZ ls ;g vis{kk fd;k tkuk vlaxr ugha gS fd og fnukad 15-09-

2007 ds mijkar 31-10-2008 rd dk;Z djus laca/kh izys[kh; izek.k izLrqr djsA fdarq izkFkhZ izfrijh{kk esa ;g

Lohdkj djrk gS fd mlus fnukad 15-09-2007 ls 31-10-2008 rd dke djus ds laca/k esa dksbZ vfHkys[k i=koyh

ij is’k ugha fd;k gSA izkFkhZ us ;g Hkh dgk gS fd fnukad 15-09-2007 ls 31-10-2008 ds chp vU; O;fDr;ksa ds

uke dh txg mlls dke fy;k tkrk FkkA fdarq izFke rks izkFkhZ us ;g rF; vius vfHkopuksa esa of.kZr ugha fd;k

vkSj f}rh;r% vius eq[; ijh{k.k ds 'kiFk i= esa Hkh ugha dgkA bl fLFkfr esa izkFkhZ dk ;g dFku fdlh izdkj

Lohdk;Z ,oa xzká ugha gSA

16- ;gk ;g mYys[k fd;k tkuk Hkh vko';d gS fd Hkkjr ljdkj }kjk lanfHkZr fookn esa izkFkhZ dh lsok lekfIr frfFk

01-11-2008 fy[kh xbZ gSA bl vf/kdj.k dks jsQjsal vkns'k esa of.kZr lsok lekfIr frfFk dks 01-11-2008 ds LFkku

ij 15-09-2007 ekurs gq;s fookn dk U;k;fu.kZ;u djus dk {ks=kf/kdkj ugha gSA bl izdkj izkFkhZ us pkgs 15-09-

2007 ls iwoZ ds o"kksZ esa 240 fnu ls vf/kd foi{kh ds v/khu dk;Z fd;k gks] fdarq vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 B ds

varxZr lsok lekfIr frfFk ds iwoZorhZ ,d o"kZ dh vof/k esa 240 fnu dk;Z fd;k tkuk izekf.kr djus dk nkf;Ro

Lo;a izkFkhZ ¼deZdkj½ ij gh vkjksfir gSA bl fl}hHkkj dks izkFkhZ vius izys[kh; lk{; ls izekf.kr ugha dj ldk

gSA foi{kh lk{kh Jh Hkxoku lgk; egkoj us vius ijh{k.k esa ;g dgk gS fd izkFkhZ us vafre ckj fnukad

15-09-2007 dks cSad esa dk;Z fd;k vkSj izkFkhZ dk ;g dFku xyr gS fd izkFkhZ 31-10-2008 rd dk;Z ij vk;k gksA

bl lk{kh ls dh xbZ izfrijh{kk esa Hkh lk{kh dk ;g dFku [kf.Mr ugha fd;k tk ldk gSA

17- Lkk{; dh bl fLFkfr esa izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr fu.kZ;ksa LVsV vkWQ mRrjkapy cuke cyjke flag] Tkh-Vh-vkj-Vh-

lsUVj csaxyksj cuke dfj;Iik ¼e`rd½ }kjk fof/kd izfrfuf/k o ;wfu;u vkWQ bafM;k cuke t;jkt ,u- 'ksVVh esa

ekuuh; mRrjkpay] dukZVd ,oa cEcbZ mPp U;k;ky; }kjk izfrikfnr fof/k ftlesa ;g dgk x;k gS fd

lsokeqfDr ds iwoZorhZ ,d o"kZ esa 240 fnu lsokjr jgus dk rF; izekf.kr djus dk fl}hHkkj Lo;a deZdkj ij gSA

dk;Z fnolksa dh x.kuk djrs le; jfo ,oa 'kfuokjh; vodk'kksa dks fopkkfjr djuk pkfg;s vkfn] rF;kRed

fHkUurk ds dkj.k izkFkhZ ds i{k esa lgk;d ugha gSA D;ksafd izkFkhZ fnukad 15-09-2007 ds mijkar foi{kh ds v/khu

dk;Zjr jgus dk rF; izekf.kr gh ugha dj ldk gSA

18- pwafd izkFkhZ dfFkr lsok lekfIr dh frfFk 31-10-2008 ds iwoZorhZ ,d o"kZ dh vof/k esa 240 fnu dk;Z djus dk

rF; izekf.kr gh ugha dj ldk gSA blfy;s dfFkr lsok lekfIr ds iwoZ vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 F ds izko/kkuksa dk

vuqikyu foi{kh }kjk fd;k tkuk visf{kr ugha jgrk gSA LVsV vkWQ fcgkj cuke xtk/kj flag ds fu.kZ; esa

ekuuh; iVuk mPp U;k;ky; }kjk izfrikfnr fof/k rF;kred fHkUurk ds dkj.k izkFkhZ ds i{k esa lgk;d ugha gSA

vr% ;g fcUnq izkFkhZ ds fo:} fu.khZr fd;k tkrk gSA

20- izkFkhZ us bl laca/k esa vius 'kiFk i= esa ;g dgk gS fd fnukad 01-11-2008 ls rRdkyhu 'kk[kk izca/kd egsUnz

iztkifr us mls ekSf[kd vkns'k }kjk lsok ls i`Fkd dj fn;k vkSj iz’kkUr uked O;fDr dks dk;Z ij yxk fy;kA

bl laca/k esa ;g fopkj.kh; gS fd izFke rks izkFkhZ fnukad 31-10-2008 rd dk;Zjr jgus dk rF; izekf.kr ugha dj

ldk gS vkSj nwljs 01-11-2008 dks rRdkyhu 'kk[kk izca/kd }kjk izkFkhZ dks lsok i`Fkd fd;s tkus dk rF; fdlh

izys[kh; izek.k ls iq"V ugha gSA izfrijh{kk esa izkFkhZ us dgk gS fd mlus iz'kkUr dk fu;qfDr i= ugha ns[kk fdarq

bl uke dk O;fDfr cSad esa dk;Z djrk FkkA foi{kh ds lk{kh Hkxoku lgk; dk dFku gS fd rRdkyhu 'kk[kk

izca/kd egsUnz iztkifr ds fo:} izkFkhZ us tks vk{ksi yxk;s gS og ljklj xyr gSA izkFkhZ fnukad 15-09-2007 ds

ckn Lo;a viuh ethZ ls mifLFkr ugha gqvk rks ,slh fLFkfr esa lkQ lQkbZ ds dk;Z dh vko';drk gksus ij dqN

le; ds fy;s iz'kkUr uke ds O;fDr dks dk;Z iznku fd;k x;k vkSj mlds ckn Hkh vU; 9 O;fDr;ksa us

vko';drk vuq:Ik lkQ lQkbZ dk dk;Z nSfud osru Hkksxh ds :Ik esa fd;kA bl lk{kh ds dFku ls ;g Li"V gS

fd izkFkhZ dh lsok lekfIr frfFk 31-10-2008 gksuk izekf.kr ugha gqvk gSA blfy;s fnukad 15-09-2007 ds ckn]

tcfd izkFkhZ Lo;a dk;Z NksMdj pyk x;k] foi{khx.k us vko';drk vuqHko gksus ij u dsoy iz'kkUr uked O;fDr

ls oju~ vU; 9 O;fDr;ksa ls Hkh] ¼ftudk mYys[k 'kiFk i= esa gS½ lQkbZ dk dk;Z fy;kA

21- bl rF;kRed ifjn`’; esa izkFkhZ dh vkSj ls izLrqr fu.kZ; gjftUnj flag cuke iatkc LVsV os;j gkmflax dksiZ- esa

ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fof/k o lqizhUVsaMsaV mEesn gkWLihVy tks/kiqj cuke tt b.MLVªh;y fVªC;quy

esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fof/k izkFkhZ ds i{k esa rF;kRed fHkUurk ds dkj.k lgk;d izrhr

ugha gqbZ gSA bl foospu ds mijkar izkFkhZ ;g izekf.kr djus esa foQy jgk gS fd lsok lekfIr frfFk 01-11-2008

dks izkFkhZ ls dfu"Brj fdlh O;fDfr dks foi{khx.k us fu;kstu esa j[kk gks vkSj izkFkhZ dks ojh;rk ugha nh xbZ gksA

izkFkhZ fnukad 15-09-2007 ds mijkar Lo;a gh vuqifLFkr gks x;kA vr% ;g fcUnq izkFkhZ ds fo:} fofu'fpr fd;k

tkrk gSA

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 14, 2024/अग्रिायण 23, 1946

5251

23- bl laca/k esa vfHkHkk"kd foi{kh ds rdZ ij fopkj djus ds lkFk&lkFk eSaus izn'kZ M&1] vkSj izn'kZ M&2] izkFkhZ

}kjk izLrqr izkFkZuk i=ksa rFkk f=i{kh; le>kSrk fnukad 18-03-2008 ds lqlaxr izko/kkuksa dk ifj'khyu fd;kA

24- izn'kZ M&1] esa izkFkhZ us Li"V dgk gS fd mlus fnukad 01-05-2001 ls 31-03-2007 rd dh vof/k esa N% ckj 240

fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z dj fujarj lsok dh 'krZ dks iwjk fd;k rFkk 01-04-2007 ls 156-09-2007 dh vof/k esa 120

fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z fd;kA izn'kZ M&2] izkFkZuk i= esa izkFkhZ us viuh dk;Z vof/k 01-05-2001 ls 15-09-2007 Li"V

:Ik ls of.kZr dh gSA f=i{kh; le>kSrk fnukad 18-03-2008 esa le>kSrs dh 'krksZ esa fuEukuqlkj mYys[k fd;k x;k

gSA

III

bl 'krZ ds vuqlkj ;|fi izkFkhZ 15-09-2007 rd dk;Zjr Fkk fdarq foi{kh ds

v/khu fnukad 18-03-2008 ¼le>kSrs dh frfFk½ dks og fdlh Hkh :Ik esa dk;Zjr ugha FkkA bl fy;s ;g Li"V gS fd

le>kSrs ds frfFk dks izkFkhZ ds foi{kh ds v/khu dk;Zjr u gksus ds dkj.k og LFkkbZdj.k gsrq fopkfjr fd;s tkus

;ksX; deZdkj ugha FkkA bl fu"d"kZ ds mijkar izkFkhZ f=i{kh; le>kSrk fnukad 08-03-2008 ds varxZr foi{khx.k ls

dksbZ ykHk izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh izekf.kr ugha gksrk gSA vr% ;g fcUnq Hkh izkFkhZ ds fo:} fu.khZr fd;k tkrk

gSA

fopkj.kh; fcUnq la[;k&1] 2 o 3] izkFkhZ ds fo:} fofu'fpr gq;s gSA izkFkhZ dh vksj ls dqynhi flag cuke th-,u-

vkbZ-Mh-Mh- ,.M ,Q- lsUVj] vtkbc flag cuke ljfgUn dksijsfVo ekdsZfVax de izkslsflax lfoZl lqlkbVh fyfe-]

rFkk egkohj flag cuke ;w-ih- LVsV bysDVªhflVh cksMZ] fu.kZ; izLrqr fd;s x;s gSA bu fu.kZ;ksa esa ekuuh; mPpre

U;k;ky; us ;g ekxZn'kZu fn;k gS fd ifjlhek vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds izko/kkuksa ds

laca/k esa ykxw ugha gS vkSj ek= foyEc ds vk/kkj ij deZdkj dks vuqrks"k ls badkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA pwafd

izkFkhZ ds fo:}] lHkh fopkj.kh; fcUnq fofu'fpr gq;s gSa] blfy;s izkFkhZ dks dksbZ vuqrks"k fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr ugha

gSA vkSj bu fu.kZ;ksa esa ikfjr fof/k izkFkhZ ds i{k esa lgk;d ugha gSA fu"d"kZ :Ik esa izkFkhZ] foi{khx.k ls dksbZ

vuqrks"k ikus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA

26- lanfHkZr fookn dk fuLrkj.k blh izdkj fd;k tkrk gSA

27- vf/kfu.kZ; dh izfrfyfi vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 dh /kkjk 17 ¼1½ ds vuqlj.k esa izdk'kukFkZ izsf"kr dh

tkosA

28- U;k;ky; }kjk vf/kfu.kZ; vkt fnukad 24-09-2024 dks lquk;k x;kA

jk/kkeksgu prqosZnh] ihBklhu vf/kdkjh

नई दिल्ली, 10 दिसम् बर, 2024

का.आ. 2241.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 (a1947 dk 14 ) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

बैंक ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V औद्योजगक fookn esa

औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; iVuk ds iapkV (a 10 (C ) of 2022) izdkf” kr djrh gSA

[सं. ,y - 12011/09/2022- vkbZ vkj (ch-II)]

सलोनी] उप जनिेिक

New Delhi, the 10th December, 2024

S.O. 2241.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 10 (C ) of 2022) of the Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Patna as

shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Punjab National Bank and their

workmen.

[No. L-12011/09/2022- IR(B-II)]

SALONI, Dy. Director

5252

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 14, 2024/AGRAYANA 23, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

Before The Presiding Officer,Industrial Tribunal, Patna.

Reference Case No.:- 10 (C) of 2022

Between the management of Circle Head, Punjab National Bank, Circle Office, Chanakya Place, ‘R’ Block,

Patna (Bihar)-800001 And their workman Shri Zamil Ahmad, Temporary PTS, represented through the President,

Bank Employees Federation, Bihar, Saboo Complex, 2^nd Floor, Behind Republic Hotel, Exhibition Road, Patna (

Bihar ) - 800001.

For the management:-

Sri Hemant Kumar Karn, Advocate.

For the workman:-

Sri B. Prasad, President, Bank Employees Federation,Bihar.

Present:-

Manoj Shankar

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal, Patna.

A W A R D

Patna, dt- 24^th September, 2024.

By the adjudication order no.- L-12011/09/2022-IR(B-II) New Delhi, dated- 13.01.2022 the Govt. of India

Ministry of Labour New Delhi has referred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of

the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, ( hereinafter to be referred to as “ the Act”) the following dispute between the

management of Circle Head, Punjab National Bank, Circle Office, Chanakya Place, ‘R’ Block, Patna (Bihar)-800001

And their workman Shri Zamil Ahmad, Temporary PTS, represented through the President, Bank Employees

Federation, Bihar, Saboo Complex, 2^nd Floor, Behind Republic Hotel, Exhibition Road, Patna ( Bihar ) - 800001 for

adjudication to this tribunal.

SCHEDULE

“Whether the action of the management of Punjab National Bank, Bihar in terminating the services of Shri

Zamil Ahmad, Temporary Part-Time Sweeper, Kurji branch w.e.f. 01.02.2015 is just, proper and legal? if not, to what

relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”

As per the statement of claim, the case of the workman Zamil Ahmad is that he worked at Punjab National

Bank, Exhibition Road, Patna Branch as a part time sweeper on the basis of stop gap arrangement during the period

2008 to 2011. It is further asserted that Zamil Ahmad worked as a part time sweeper for more than 163 days as a

temporary workman and his name was empanelled for temporary appointment. It is further asserted that the workman

used to discharged his duties of sweeping the floor of the bank premises, cleaning courters, chairs, tables as well. It is

further asserted that the Exhibition Road, Patina Branch of the bank furnished full details with Circle Head, Patna

regarding the working days and payment of amount made to the workman. Thereafter, the workman was temporarily

appointed as a part time sweeper at Kurji branch, Patna at 02.05.2013. It is further asserted that workman was

appointed against a permanent vacant post of part time sweeper and he used to discharged the duties from 9.30 A.M

to 12.30 P.M and here in the Kurji Branch too, workman used to discharged his part time sweeper work and sweeping

and cleaning of the branch premises and dusting of chair and counters and he was paid pro-rata wages of a part time

sweeper under 1/3^rd scale wages of a full time subordinate staff. It is further asserted that the workman was being paid

his monthly wages like other member of the staffs of the branch and he was also putting his attendance in attendance

register. It is further asserted that during serving at Kurji Branch the management conducted an interview for filling of

certain post of part time sweepers and workman also called upon to appear before the interview board. It is further

asserted that temporary workman required to be confirmed in the services of the bank after expiry of a period of six

months. As per rule Zamil Ahmad ought to be confirmed in the services of the bank from 01.11.2014. It is further

asserted that workman had requested for his confirmation / regularisation to the bank authority but management bank

threatened him for his termination. On this apprehension the workman caused Industrial Dispute through his

sponsoring union on 20.02.2015 before the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C), Patna and a notice was sent to the

management by the ALC (C), Patna on 24.02.2015. It is further asserted that after receiving the notice dt- 24.02.2015,

management bank terminated the service of the workman on 01.03.2015 during the pendency of conciliation

proceeding. It is further asserted that the conciliation officer held conciliation proceeding but even after 45 days of the

conciliation proceeding the matter was not settled than workman filed Industrial Dispute case u/s-2A ( 1& 11 ) of the

I.D. (Amendment) Act, 2010 before this tribunal that was numbered as Industrial Dispute Case No.- 07 (C) of 2015. It

is further asserted that as per the order of the Hon’ble Patna High Court on 22.11.2017 in CWJC No.- 2053 of 2016

the workman withdraw his I.D. Case and further caused another dispute for the same grievances before the Regional

Labour Commissioner (C) Patna which culminated in Reference Case and that is sent to this tribunal for adjudication

by the appropriate Govt.. It is further asserted that the termination of the workman is covered u/s-2(oo) of the I.D.

Act. Moreover, management bank violated the mandatory provision as contain in section 25(F) of the I.D. Act. It is

also asserted that bank violated the Bipartite Settlement while not confirming the temporary workman after expiry of

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 14, 2024/अग्रिायण 23, 1946

5253

six months of temporary service. It is further asserted that management violated u/s-25 (G) (H) of the I.D. Act and

also resorted the unfair labour practice as per schedule-V read with section-25 (T) of the I.D. Act. Thus workman

prays for the following relief (S);

(i) Reinstatement in the services of the bank with back wages;

(ii)

Confirmation / regularisation in the service of the bank as a Part Time Sweeper under 1/3^rd scale

wages of a subordinate staff;

(iii) Payment of cost of Rs. 10,000/- for contesting the dispute;

(iv) Any other relief (S) as the tribunal deems fit and proper;

On the other hand management bank filed written statement and stated therein no employer-employee

relationship between the bank and the Mr. Zamil Ahmad so called dispute raised by the Mr. Zamil Ahmad does not

constitute an Industrial Dispute, as defined under the provisions of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. It is further

asserted that applicant Zamil Ahmad was never appointed in terms of selection rules and no appointment letter was

ever been issued by the bank ( PNB ). So there was no employer-employee relationship between the PNB and the

applicant and as such no right of permanent employment in the bank can be conferred to the applicant. It is further

asserted that service conditions of workman staff in the Banking Industry are Governed by the provisions of Sastry

Award, Desai Award and various Bipartite Settlements and in terms of para 16.9 of the Bipartite Settlement, persons

who are engaged to do casual work are excluded from the operation of the award. It is further asserted that Mr. Zamil

Ahmad has never been appointed by the bank. He has rendered his service that was totally on requirement basis of the

bank for which he was duly paid. It is further asserted that the claim as made by the union, Zamil Ahmad was

working as permanent part time sweeper is not correct because there is well defined and set procedure of appointment

of permanent part time sweeper in the bank and time and again, recruitment process is done for appointment in

subordinate cadre as per guidelines. Mr. Zamil Ahmad raised his dispute before the ALC (C), Patna and the

management on receiving the letter dt- 20.02.2015 of ALC(C), Patna has filed written statement before the ALC (C)

Patna on 14.09.2015. The conciliation proceeding was in process and FOC was still not recorded but the workman

without waiting for the final outcome of the proceeding filed I.D. Case u/s-2A of the I.D. Act. It is further asserted

that the claim as filed by the union on behalf of the Zamil Ahmad regarding his working in the bank as a part time

sweeper against the permanent post of part time sweeper is totally incorrect because Zamil Ahmad was just a casual

worker in staff gap arrangement on intermittent basis for which he was duly paid. It is further asserted that the claim

of the workman he was paid pro-data wages of part time sweeper under 1/3^rd scale is denied by the management bank

because Mr. Dayal was utilized on ad-hoc basis and he was paid accordingly. It is further asserted that the claim of

the workman he was paid monthly salary is also incorrect because complainant was paid wages for the work he

performed voluntarily and he not an employee of the bank. It is further asserted that Mr. Zamil Ahmad applied for the

permanent post of part time sweeper in our bank but he did not fulfil the eligibility criteria which ultimately led to

cancellation of his candidature. It is further asserted that bank has not violated any provision of the I.D. Act tried to

shown by the workman side in its statement of claim. Since the complainant was not an employee of the bank and his

services was taken as per requirement of the bank in which he was duly paid. So management bank has not resorted

any unfair labour practice and thus there is no merit in the complaint application of the workman and is fit to be

dismissed.

Having gone through the statement of claim of the workman side and written statement as filed by the

management bank, the following issues are recasted for the adjudication:-

(i)

“Whether the grievances / dispute of the workman Zamil Ahmad come under the purview of

Industrial Dispute?”

(ii)

“Whether the action of the management of Punjab National Bank, Bihar in terminating the services of

Shri Zamil Ahmad, Temporary Part-Time Sweeper, Kurji branch w.e.f. 01.02.2015 is just, proper and

legal? if not, to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?”

In order to establish the claim of the workman, the workman side examined one witness namely Md. Zamil

Ahamad( W.W-1 ) the workman himself. Besides, oral evidence, workman side filed some documents and got it

marked Extsas :-

(i)

Ext.-W Letter dt- 22.02.2013 written by Zamil Ahmad to the Regional Manager, PNB, Patna

Circle.

(ii)

Ext.-W/1 Photo copy of payment register fo conveyance charges.

(iii)

Ext.-W/1-1 Payment vouchers dt- 27.05.2013 (Conveyance Charges)

(iv)

Ext.-W/2 Voucher dt- 29.05.2013

(v)

Ext.-W/3 Payment voucher dt- 28.02.2015.

5254

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 14, 2024/AGRAYANA 23, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(vi)

Ext.-W/4 Photo copy of attendance registers from to W/4-12 March-2013 to April-2014.

(vii)

Ext.-W/5 Letter dt- 03.10.2013 information given to thana incharge fir administration written by

the Branch Manager, Kurji.

(viii)

Ext.-W/6 Letter dt- 28.11.2014 written by Branch Manager regarding issuance of ATM authorising

Zamil Ahmad..

(ix)

Ext.-W/7 Letter dt- 03.09.2014 written by Manager PNB, Kurji to the Chief Manager ZSC, Patna

regarding stationary material authorising Zamil Ahmad.

(x)

Ext.-W/8 Letter dt-08.10.2014 call letter issued by Manager Kurji given to the Chief Manager,

HRD, regarding pension working.

(xi)

Ext.-W/9 Letter dt- 03.11.2014 written by Chief Manager given to the incumbent Manager BO-

Kurji regarding interview of Zamil Ahmad for the appointment of PTS in Patna Town.

(xii)

Ext.-W/10 SLC of Zamil Ahmad issued on05.02.2000.

(xiii)

Ext.-W/10-1 Employment Exchange Card in the name of Md. Zamil Ahmad.

(xiv)

Ext.-W/10-2 Residential Certificate dt- 12.05.2012 in the name of Md. Zamil Ahmad issued by

Govt. of Bihar.

(xv)

Ext.-W/10-3 Caste Certificate dt- 12.05.2012in the name of Md. Zamil Ahmad issued by Govt. of

Bihar.

(xvi)

Ext.-W/10-4 Call letter for appointment of PTS in Patna Town issued by Chief Manager dt-

03.11.2014 given to the Incumbent incharge BO: Kurji, Patna.

(xvii)

Ext.- W/11 Photo copy of salary bill regarding stop gap payment of Md. Zamil Ahmad.

(xviii)

Ext.-W/12 to Photo copy of Salary Bill regarding stop W/12/13 gap payment of Md. Zamil Ahmad.

(xix)

Ext.- W/13 On attendance register signature of Mr. Anil Kumar (M.W-2 )i.e previous marked Ext.-

W/4 series from July-2013 to April-2014.

On the other hand management side also examined two witnesses from its side who are namely Sunil Kumar

( M.W-1 ) and Anil Kumar (M.W-2 ) and besides oral evidence, management side also filed some documents get its

marked Extd. as:-

(i)

Ext.-M Photo copy of circular regarding temporary of PTS dt- 08.07.2009.

(ii)

Ext.-M/1 Photo copy of PAD Circular letter no.-02/2014 dt- 11.09.2014.

(iii)

Ext.-M/2 Photo copy of PAD Circular letter no.- 14 dt- 21.11.2015 regarding policy for recruitment

of sub-staff including Armed Guards and full time sweeper / PTS.

(iv)

Ext.-M/3 Photo copy of letter dt- 06.11.2008 HRD Division Circular letter no-25/2008 regarding

recruitment of sub-ordinate staff.

(v)

Ext.-M/4 Letter dt- 02.04.2011 PAD Circular letter no.- 04/2011 regarding eligibility criteria for

recruitment of Part Time Employee in the subordinate cadre of the Bank.

Now first of all this tribunal scrutinizes the evidence of workman side first. W.W-1 Md. Zamil Ahmad is the

workman himself. Who is stated in his evidence that he has worked at exhibition road branch of PNB from 2008 to

2011 thereafter, the branch of PNB opened at Kurji and he also worked in the Kurji Branch from May 2013 to March

2015 as a part time sweeper. This witness further stated that he used to open the bank gate at 8.00 A.M and thereafter

he did cleaning work of the bank premises and during the working hours of the bank he did the work of hospitality

and used to put registers, vouchers at the instruction of Branch Manager. This witness further stated that he has

submitted an application dt- 20.02.2013 to Circle Head, PNB, Patna for his engagement at new branch of Kurji and

the same is proved as Ext.-W. This witness further stated that he was also deputed for some work by the Kurji Branch

Manager for which he received conveyance charge and he has filed the details of conveyance charge he receive from

the Kurji Branch i.e from 13.07.2013 to 26.11.2014 i.e from page- 08 to 12 i.e marked as Ext.-W/1. On query by this

tribunal this witness categorically admits that there is no signature and seal of the manager on the said documents that

is marked as Ext.-W/1. This witness further stated that he has file only one voucher for conveyance payment i.e of dt-

27.05.2013 and the same is proved as Ext.-W/1-1. This witness further proved a vouchers of dt- 29.05.14 showing the

payment of advanced salary of Rs. 2000/- marked as Ext.- W/2. This witness further proved a voucher dt- 28.02.2015

Combo Transfer voucher dt- 28.02.2015 showing the salary of month February 2015 total amount Rs. 4266.10 Ps.

comprising Basic pay, D.A, HRA and the same is proved by him as Ext.- W/3. On query by this tribunal, this witness

categorically stated that the payment of voucher of dt- 28.02.2015 was credited in his bank account and he can filed

the statement of the bank account. This witness further stated that he has worked at Kurji Branch from the year 2013

to 2015and he was getting 1/3^rd salary of a permanent sweeper comprising Basic pay, D.A, HRA. This witness further

stated that he used to put his signature on attendance register and he has file the photo copy of the attendance register

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 14, 2024/अग्रिायण 23, 1946

5255

from March-2013 to April—2014i.e marked as Ext.- W/4 to W/4-12 respectively. This witness further proved the

letter of Kurji Branch Manager dt- 03.10.2013 delivered to Patliputra PS for security guard of the branch i.e marked

as Ext.- W/5. This witness further proved a letter of dt- 28.11.2014 issued by the Branch Manager authorising him to

collect Rupay ATM card from section of Circle Office, and he same is marked as Ext.-W/6. This witness further

stated that he was also deputed to bring stationary material from ZSC Patna by Kurji Branch Manager through letter

dt- 03.09.2014 addressing to Chief Manager, ZSC, Patna and proved it as Ext.- W/7. This witness further proved the

letter dt- 08.10.2014 issued by branch manager, kurjito Chief Manager, HR department, Circle Office, regarding his

working details as on stop gap arrangement and the same is proved as Ext.-W/8. This witness further proved the

interview letter for appointment of PTS of dt- 03.11.2014 issued of Chief Manager and the same is proved as Ext.-

W/9. This witness further stated that on the basis of call letter, he appeared for interview along with SLC, zerox copy

of employment exchange registration document, caste certificate and residence certificate and he has proved all the

documents that is marked as Ext.- W/10 to W/10-4 respectively. This witness further stated that he did not get any

appointment letter after the interview rather he was stopped from working from 01.03.2015 and no notice or notice

pay was given to him by the bank. This witness further stated that he has claimed for reinstatement of the services of

the bank and for regularisation for the post of PTS 1/3^rd salary basis. This witness further proved entries of the

statement of bank account showing his salary payment from the 25.01.2014 to 10.06.2015 i.e from page 27 to 32 the

entry of his salary in the statement of account is under lined and is marked as Ext.- W/11. He also filed the copy of

salary bills register i.e from May-2013 to September 2013 in which his salary details is mentioned bearing the

signature of manager i.e from page 33 to 48 and that is marked as Ext.- W/12 to W/12-15 respectively.

In cross examination this witness categorically admitted in para-23 that he did the work of part time sweeper

in the bank. He also admits that he did not get any appointment letter but he received the salary for his work and he

received salary once in a month but he did not get leave like a permanent employee. This witness also admits in para-

27 of the cross-examination the documents is filed before this tribunal, he received from the bank. This witness

further stated in para-28 of the cross-examination that this is not fact that he did not qualify selection process and

thereafter he filed his dispute out of excitement.

On the other hand management side examined two witnesses out of them M.W-1 Sunil Kumar is the director

in PNB RSETI Gaya who examined before this tribunal on 11.05.2023. This witness stated in examination-in-chief

that he was posted in Kurji Branch, PNB from March 2013 to 08.06.2013 at that time Kurji Branch was opened but

there was no permanent peon. Md. Zamil Ahmad was engaged as a part time sweeper on stop gap arrangement basis,

he was doing only cleaning work of the bank premises. This witness further proved the Circular of PNB dt-

08.07.2009 regarding engagement of temporary sweeper in the place of permanent / part time sweeper marked as

Ext.-M. This witness further stated that the workman was also make his presence in the attendance register of the

PNB and on the basis of his attendance the payment was made to the workman. On query by the tribunal this witness

categorically stated 1/3^rd payment of part time sweeper was given to the temporary sweeper. This witness also stated

that workman was getting payment through voucher and this witness further authenticated the salary of bill register

that is marked as Ext.-W/12 filed by the workman showing the payment of workman on stop gap arrangement. This

witness also admits the Ext.-W/3 proved by the workman side shows the salary payment comprising Basic Pay, D.A,

HRA. This witness also stated in examination-in-chief that he does not remember any letter of HR department for the

workman Zamil Ahmad was received is to his branch or not and he further proved circular dt- 11.09.2014 issued from

the Head Office for the arrangement of sweeper in the leave gap arrangement of part time sweeper / full time sweeper.

He also proved the circular letter of dt- 21.09.2015 policy for recruitment of sub-staff including on Arm Guard and

full time sweepers / part time sweeper i.e marked as Ext.- M/2.

In cross-examination this witness categorically stated in para-11 that Kurji branch was opened in May 2013

and he was deputed to see the Kurji branch also. However, he was posted at Mahabali Branch as Manager. This

witness admits in para-22 of the cross-examination that the workman was sent to join Kurji branch on 02.05.2013

from HR department on staff gap arrangement basis. This witness categorically admits in para-15 that when the Kurji

Branch was opened there was no permanent part time sweeper posted there. In para-16 of the cross-examination this

witness categorically stated that this is not fact that the services of workman was taken by the bank comes under the

purview of staff gap arrangement. On query by this tribunal this witness admits that the policy of staff gap

arrangement is if permanent part time sweeper is not posted in any branch and if the bank takes the services of any

workman for that post this is staff gap arrangement. This witness categorically admits in para-18 of the cross-

examination workman the Zamil Ahmad comes under the purview of temporary workman. This witness further

admits that as per circular of bank ( Ext.-M) the temporary workman can discharged duties only for three month’s.

This witness further admits in para-22 of the cross-examination workman put his signature on the attendance register

i.e marked as Ext.-W/4. This witness categorically stated in para-29 & 30 of the cross-examination the Ext.-M/2 is

related to the recruitment but not for fresh recruitment and it is not related to regularisation.

M.W-2 Anil Kumar is the Chief Manager, PNB, Circle Office, ‘R’ Block, Patna who deposed before this

tribunal on 13.06.2023. He stated in examination- in- chief that he knows the Zamil Ahmad. He was engaged in Kurji

branch of PNB on the basis of stop gap arrangement and payment was made to him through voucher. Bank never

issued any appointment letter to Zamil Ahmad. This witness also stated that during his tenure Zamil Ahmad never file

5256

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 14, 2024/AGRAYANA 23, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

any petition for his regularisation. This witness proved the Circular of PNB dt- 06.11.2008 i.e related to the sub-

ordinate staff i.e marked as Ext.-M/3. He also proved the Circular of PNB dt0 02.04.2011 i.e related to it eligible

criteria for recruitment of part time employee and the same is proved is Ext.-M/4.

In cross-examination this witness categorically admits in para-9 that he was posted at Kurji Branch of PNB

from July 2013 to June-2014. This witness categorically stated in para-13 that he can’t say before joining Kurji

Branch Zamil Ahmad has worked at Exhibition Road Branch and does not know the Chief Manager, Exhibition Road

has recommended Zamil Ahmad for his engagement to the Circle Office Head and in para-15 of the cross-

examination this witness categorically stated that he does not know on opening of the Kurji Branch, then Circle Head

has recommended Zamil Ahmad to be engaged on part time sweeper and this witness admits in para-16 that Zamil

Ahmad was doing work of temporary worker during his tenure as he was doing in the tenure of his predecessor. In

para-17 of the cross-examination this witness admits that from 02.05.2013 to year 2015 there was no permanent part

time sweeper posted in the Kurji Branch. In para-19 of the cross-examination this witness categorically stated that

Ext.-W/3 the appointment of workman Zamil Ahmad as per Circular comprising Basic pay, D.A, HRA of 1/3

payment. This witness categorically admits in para-20 of the cross-examination Ext.-W/4 series of the workman side

is attendance registerfor the period of August 2013 to April-2014 over which he also put his signature at column -1 i.e

marked as Ext.- W/13 to W/13-9. In para-21 of the cross-examination this witness admits that the Ext.-W/4

attendance sheet of the period of August 2013 to April-2014 that shows workman did performed his duty in each

months excepting on 05.10.2013. In para-24 of the cross-examination this witness categorically admits that he does

not know Raj Kumar, Ajit Kumar, N.K. Upadhaya who did duties as a temporary worker and they got regularisation

in the services bank by of the order of this tribunal.

10.

It is argued on behalf of the representative of the workman side that workman Zamil Ahmad was initially

engaged at Exhibition Road Branch, PNB as a part time sweeper on the basis of stop gap arrangement where he

discharged his duties for 163 days in between 2008 -2011. It is further argued that the Exhibition Road Branch has

sent the details of the workman Zamil Ahmad regarding his working to the Circle Office, Patna from where Zamil

Ahmad was sent to Kurji Branch on its opening to discharge the duties of part time sweeper against a permanent

vacant post accordingly workman was started working from 02.05.2013. It is further argued that like a permanent part

time sweeper, he used to put his signature in the attendance register that is produced before this tribunal marked as

Ext.-W/4 series. It is also argued that the workman was paid by the bank at pro-rata basis under 1/3^rd pay scale of a

full time subordinate staff and accordingly workman was paid salary for each month comprising Basic pay, D.A, &

HRA that is evident from Ext.-W/3 and Ext.-W/11 the details of salary entry in his pass book and Ext.-W/12 series

the payment register of the Kurji Branch of bank. It is further argued that the workman has conducted interview for

the filling of post of part time sweeper and workman was also called upon to appear in interview and accordingly

workman appeared for interview on 11.11.2014 along with his details SLC, Caste Certificate, Employment Exchange

registration card ( document ), residence certificate but he was not considered rather a fresh hand was selected. It is

further argued that the workman has raised his grievance before the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C), Patna and

when the dispute was not settled then he filed I.D. Case that was Numbered as.- 07(C)of 2015 but later on it was

withdrawn on the basis of order of the Hon’ble High Court passed in CWJC No.-2053 of 2017 than he raised his

grievance before the Regional Labour Commissioner (C), Patna then his matter was referred to this tribunal.

Workman himself supported regarding his duties and payment salary given by the bank in his evidence and he also

filed the connecting documents. Management witness also supported the contention of the workman in his evidence

regarding his engagement in Kurji Branch as a part time sweeper as no permanent part time sweeper was posted. It is

further argued that workman discharged his duties Kurji Branch from May 2013 to 28.02.2015 uninterruptedly and he

has working for more than 240 days continuous in a calendar year as per section 25(B) of the I.D. Act but he was

terminated from the work i.e covered u/s- 2(oo) of the I.D. Act and the request of the workman and grievance of the

workman is not considered by the management bank this is a kind of unfair labour practice as per item no.-10,

Schedule V of the I.D. Act read with section-25(T) of the I.D. Act. It is argued from the workman side earlier one Ajit

Kumar was engaged in PNB as a part time sweeper and his services was regularised by the order of this tribunal held

in Reference Case No.- 07(C) of 1987 and one Mintu Kumar who was engaged by the management bank as a

temporary sub-staff but he was stopped from the working and then he raised dispute for reinstatement in service that

was also allowed by this tribunal in Reference Case No.- 06(C) of 2005 and the order of this tribunal was upheld by

the Hon’ble Supreme Court to in Civil Appeal No.- 1135 of 2019 the case of Zamil Ahmad is at par with the case of

the above workman Anil Kumar and Mintu Kumar in whose favour the order was passed by this tribunal and so

Zamil Ahmad is also entitled for his reinstatement in the services of the bank and further his service to be regularised

as a part time sweeper.Accordingly workman is entitled for reinstatement and regularisation of his service.

11.

On the other hand it is argued from the management side the claim of the workman Zamil Ahmad is not at all

maintainable as there was no employer-employee relationship between the bank and Zamil Ahmad so his dispute does

not constitute an Industrial Dispute. It is also argued that bank has its own recruitment policy and procedure for filling

up permanent post in subordinate cadre staff and there is circular of taking service of a person on staff gap

arrangement that is brought by management side before this tribunal marked as Ext.- M, M/3, M/4 and M/2. It is

further argued that bank took the services of Zamil Ahmad purely on need based for which he was duly paid and he

was never issued any appointment letter rather he worked in the bank leave gap arrangement. It is further argued that

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािपत्र : दिसम् बर 14, 2024/अग्रिायण 23, 1946

5257

the workman Zamil Ahmad also participated in the recruitment process of the appointment of part time sweeper but

he could not found fit and when the post was filled bank did not take the services of Zamil Ahmad so there ws no

need to issue notice or notice pay to the Zamil Ahmad. The Zamil Ahmad has no right to raise the dispute for

reinstatement as a part time sweeper when there is no vacant post in Patna circular. Bank has not violated any

provision of the I.D. Act without a proper recruitment process no one can be appointed in the bank as a subordinate

staff. It is also argued that workman did not produced any authentic evidence for his continuous service for more than

240 days. Moreover, management witness also thoroughly established in their evidence that the claim of the workman

is not sustainable, accordingly the action of the management of PNB not taking the services of Zamil Ahmad from

01.02.2015 is just and proper.

12.

Considering all the facts & materials available on the record and submissions as advanced on behalf of both

the sides, This tribunal takes first issue for the adjudication. This tribunal finds that management side strongly

contended in its written statement that since there is no employer-employee relationship between the bank and

applicant Zamil Ahmad, so his dispute does not come under the purview of Industrial Dispute as defined in Industrial

Dispute Act,1947. However, workman side opposed his plea of the management and submitted that Zamil Ahmad

was engaged as a part time sweeper against the permanent vacant post of part time sweeper in Kurji Branch of

management bank and this is duly admitted and accepted by the management witnesses too in their evidence before

this tribunal. It is also submitted by the workman side that in banking industry there are three kinds of workmen,

permanent, part time and temporary workman and this is duly admitted by the management witness no.-1 in his

evidence . It is also established by to the oral and documentary evidence as placed by the workman side, Zamil

Ahmad was getting salary of part time sweeper in his bank account on the prevailing rate of Basic Pay, D.A, HRA on

pro-rata basic salary of a permanent part time sweeper and he discharged his duties first time at Exhibition Road

Branch of management bank from 2008 to 2011 and 2^nd time he discharged his duties as a part time sweeper from

02.05.2013 to February 2015 on opening of the Kurji Branch of management bank, Patna when there was no

permanent part time sweeper posted Ext.-W the application of Zamil Ahmad for appointment of part time sweeper

given to Divisional Head Office of management bank, Patna disclosing he has already discharged 163 days duties at

Exhibition Road as staff gap worker and that application was received by Exhibition Road Branch and forwarded to

the HRD, Accordingly the grievances of the workman Zamil Ahmad is certainly an Industrial Dispute when he was

stopped from working by the Kurji Branch of the management bank in February 01.02.2015 and taking his grievances

in the Industrial Dispute the appropriate Govt. referred the reference to this tribunal to adjudicate the issue. So this

tribunal does not find any force in the contention of the management side. So the issue no.-1 is decided in favour of

the workman.

13.

Now so far as issue no.-2 is concerned that is core issue of this reference. In this context, workman Zamil

Ahmad thoroughly supported this facts that he has discharged the duties as a part time sweeper initially at Exhibition

Road Branch of management bank from 2008 to 2011 and during this period he was engaged 163 days by the

management bank for duties of part time sweeper and thereafter Zamil Ahmad was referred to discharged the duties

of a part time sweeper at Kurji Branch on its opening day on 02.05.2013 by the authority of the PNB there was no

permanent part time sweeper posted there. This is duly supported by Zamil Ahmad through his oral and documentary

evidence i.e evident from Ext.-W/1 to W/9 vide payment vouchers, attendance register of his working conveyance

charges receive from the bank and deputation letter issue by the Branch Manager for Zamil Ahmad and vide Ext.-

W/11 salary bill showing the payment to Zamil Ahmad by the bank and Ext.-W/12 to W/12-13 salary bill payment of

Zamil Ahmad, Ext.-W/13 series signature of the then Branch Manager over the attendance register in which Zamil

Ahmad was putting his presence on the attendance register and management bank also did not controvert about the

working and salary of Zamil Ahmad rather M.W-1 admits all these contentions of the workman in his evidence too,

As he categorically admits in his evidence that when a permanent part time sweeper or peon is not posted in branch

and if the management take the services of any workmen against the permanent part time sweeper or peon this is a

staff gap arrangement and that why management bank took the services of Zamil Ahmad as a part time sweeper

against the permanent post of part time sweeper and paid him the actual 1/3^rd salary payment of a permanent part time

sweeper. This tribunal further finds that management bank consistently took this plea there was employer-employee

relationship between the bank and Zamil Ahmad as Zamil Ahmad was neither given any appointment letter, nor he

was appointed as a employee of bank so he can’t claim for his reinstatement in the services of the bank. But

considering all the materials as placed by the workman side through oral and documentary evidence, it is established

fact that bank took the services of Zamil Ahmad in two stages once from 2008-2011 in Exhibition Road Branch and

in that period bank took the services of Zamil Ahmad 163 days on staff gap arrangement basis and thereafter bank

sent Zamil Ahmad to Kurji Branch on 02.05.2013 on its opening to discharge the duties of a part time sweeper as

there was no permanent part time sweeper posted there. This tribunal further finds that this is all done by the HR

Department of the management bank on the application given by Zamil Ahmad to the Divisional Head Office ( Ext.-

W ) that was received by the Exhibition Road Branch and the same was sent to the HR Department, thereafter Zamil

Ahmad was appointed at Kurji branch, of course no proper appointment letter was given to him. But the intention and

demeanour of Kurji Branch of management bank was clear, he was taking the services of Zamil Ahmad as a part time

sweeper against the permanent post of permanent part time sweeper that is duly establish by the workman side in his

oral and documentary evidence and this is not controverted by the management side either oral and documentary

5258

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 14, 2024/AGRAYANA 23, 1946

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

evidence. This tribunal further finds that bank has sent a call letter to Zamil Ahmad through Kurji Branch ( Ext.-

W/9 ) and (Ext.-W/10-4 ) to appear before the interview committee on 11.11.2014 at Circle Office, PNB along with

educational qualification, employment exchange details, SLC, Caste Certificate and Zamil Ahmad was appeared

accordingly before the interview committee along with all the certificate. At that time Zamil Ahmad was 8^th passed

and he was about 25 years of age as per SLC certificate ( Ext.-W/10 ). But inspite of having all the eligibility and

experience, why bank did not appoint Zamil Ahmad is great surprise because nothing has been proved by the

management why the Zamil Ahmad was not taken into service as a permanent part time sweeper. Moreover, it is

evident from the facts that there was no general advertisement for the appointment of the part time sweeper in that

year. This tribunal further finds that Zamil Ahmad discharged duties of part time sweeper uninterruptedly from

02.05.2013 to 01.02.2015 i.e admitted by the management bank also this continuous service of Zamil Ahmad also

touches the provision of section 25 (B) of the I.D. Act, where if a workman discharged his duties continuously for

more than 240 days in a calendar year before the termination date, he is entitled for the regularisation of his service,

so termination direction of the Kurji branch of management bank on 01.02.2015 is covered u/s-2 (oo) of the I.D. Act.

Moreover, bank had reposed the trust in the working of Zamil Ahmad what he earlier did in the Exhibition Road

branch from the year 2008 to 2011 that’s why management bank took the services of Zamil Ahmad on the opening of

the Kurji Branch on 02.05.2013 as a part time sweeper against the permanent vacant post of part time sweeper for

which bank duly paid part time sweeper salary as per banking norms. But all of sudden bank stopped Zamil Ahmad

from working on 01.02.2015 inspite of reposing trust in him and taking interaction with him on 11.11.2014 is

certainly a kind of unfair labour practice played by the management bank when management bank stopped Zamil

Ahmad from working in the Kurji Branch. This tribunal further finds that management bank has filed some circular

about the arrangement of temporary sweeper in place of permanent / temporary sweeper of dt- 08.07.2009 that shows

that temporary sweeper can be engaged not more than three months against the permanent vacant post and the bank

shall fill the permanent post during the three months. But this circular has also not used by the management bank and

took services the instant case of Zamil Ahmad beyond the circular norms. This tribunal further finds that management

has filed HR department circular no.- 25/2008 regarding the recruitment of subordinate staff ( Ext.-M/3 ) that is not

for the post of part time sweeper rather this is for recruitment of staff in subordinate cadre. Management also filed

circular dt- 02.04.2011 Ext.-M/4, the eligibility criteria of part time sweeper employee that shows that the candidates

should not be passed 10^th standard and he should be in between 18 to 24 years but there is relaxation of age three

years to OBC candidates. When the management bank called the Zamil Ahmad for personnel interaction on

11.11.2014 he was 8^th pass as per Ext.-M/4 and he was covered in age relaxation criteria as per circular Ext.-M/4 as

Zamil Ahmad was OBC candidates as per his certificate of OBC ( Ext. W/10-3 ) even then bank did not consider

Zamil Ahmad for the appointment of part time sweeper and to regularise his service reasons best known to the

management bank. In this instant case management bank did not place any cogent and authentic evidence in this

regard for not appointing Zamil Ahmad as a part time sweeper. So this is the clear cut instance of unfair labour

practice on the part of the management bank. Accordingly this tribunal finds and hold that action of the management

bank ( PNB ) in terminating the services of Zamil Ahmad as part time sweeper of Kurji Branch from 01.02.2015 is

neither just nor proper and legal.

14.

Thus on scanning of all the materials available on the record as discussed above, this is the considered

opinion of this tribunal that Zamil Ahmad has established his grievance through oral and documentary evidence

thoroughly regarding the action of the management bank in terminating him from 01.02.2015 is neither just nor

proper and legal. Accordingly, management bank ( PNB ) is directed to reinstate Zamil Ahmad in the services of bank

as part time sweeper from 01.02.2015 with all back wages and further to regularise his service within two month’s of

publication of award accordingly. This award is effected after date of publication in gazette.

This is my award accordingly.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

24.09.2024

MANOJ SHANKAR, Presiding Officer

Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.

GORAKHA NATH YADAVA

Digitally signed by GORAKHA NATH YADAVA

Date: 2024.12.19 14:24:46 +05'30'