1573 GI/2025
(993)
रजिस्ट्री सं. डी.एल. (एन) 04/0007/2003—05
REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05
xxxGIDHxxx
xxxGIDExxx
प्राजिकार से प्रकाजित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप् ताजिक
WEEKLY
सं. 09]
नई दिल् ली, मार्च 9—मार्च 15, 2025, िजनवार/फाल् गुन 18—फाल् गुन 24, 1946
No. 09]
NEW DELHI, MARCH 9—MARCH 15, 2025, SATURDAY/PHALGUNA 18– PHALGUNA 24, 1946
इस भाग में जभन् न पृष् ठ संख् या िी िाती िै जिससे दक यि पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा िा सके
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग II—खण् ड 3—उप-खण् ड (ii)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)
भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों (रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर) द्वारा िारी दकए गए सांजवजिक आिेि और अजिसूर्नाएं
Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India
(Other than the Ministry of Defence)
जवत्त मंत्रालय
(रािस्ट्व जवभाग)
(केन्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोडच)
नई दिल्ली, 18 फरवरी, 2025
का.आ. 360.—केन्र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम, 1976 के जनयम 10
के उपजनयम (4) के अनुसरण में रािस्ट्व जवभाग के अिीन, जनम्नजलजखत कायाचलयों, जिनके 80 प्रजतित से अजिक
कमचर्ाररयों ने जिन्िी का कायच सािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जलया िै, को अजिसूजर्त करती िै:
कायाचलय प्रिान मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त्त्त, दिल्ली, नई दिल्ली
1
कायाचलय प्रिान मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त, दिल्ली
2
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त (टीडीएस), दिल्ली
सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-25032025-261934
CG-DL-W-25032025-261934
994
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (टीडीएस)-1, दिल्ली
4
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (टीडीएस)-2, दिल्ली
5
कायाचलय प्रिान मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त (छूट), दिल्ली
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर मिाजनिेिक (प्रिा.एवं करिाता सेवाएं), नई दिल्ली
6
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर मिाजनिेिक (प्रिा.एवं करिाता सेवाएं), नई दिल्ली
7
कायाचलय आयकर जनिेिक (करिाता सेवाएं-I), नई दिल्ली
8
कायाचलय आयकर जनिेिक (करिाता सेवाएं-II), नई दिल्ली
9
कायाचलय आयकर जनिेिक (आिाररक संरर्ना), नई दिल्ली
10
कायाचलय आयकर जनिेिक (प्रबंिन एवं संगठन सेवाएं), नई दिल्ली
11
कायाचलय आयकर जनिेिक (व्यय बिट), नई दिल्ली
12
कायाचलय आयकर जनिेिक (आर.एंड एस. ववंग.), नई दिल्ली
13
कायाचलय आयकर जनिेिक (ि.सं.प्र. व प्र.), नई दिल्ली
कायाचलय प्रिान मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त राष्ट्रीय पिर्ान जविीन जनिाचरण केन्र, दिल्ली
14
कायाचलय प्रिान मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.), दिल्ली
15
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (मुख्या.) (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.), दिल्ली
16
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-1, दिल्ली
17
आयकर अजिकारी एनएएफएसी (मुख्या.) कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-1, दिल्ली
18
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-1(1), दिल्ली
19
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-1(1)(1), दिल्ली
20
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-1(1)(2), दिल्ली
21
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-1(2), दिल्ली
22
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-1(2)(1), दिल्ली
23
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-1(2)(2), दिल्ली
24
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-2, दिल्ली
25
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (मुख्या.) (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-2, दिल्ली
26
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-2(1), दिल्ली
27
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-2(1)(1), दिल्ली
28
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-2(1)(2), दिल्ली
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
995
29
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-2(2), दिल्ली
30
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-2(2)(1), दिल्ली
31
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-2(2)(2), दिल्ली
32
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-3, दिल्ली
33
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (मुख्या.) (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-3, दिल्ली
34
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-3(1), दिल्ली
35
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-3(1)(1), दिल्ली
36
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-3(1)(2), दिल्ली
37
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-3(2), दिल्ली
38
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-3(2)(1), दिल्ली
39
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-3(2)(2), दिल्ली
40
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-4, दिल्ली
41
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (मुख्या.) (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-4, दिल्ली
42
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-4(1), दिल्ली
43
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-4(1)(1), दिल्ली
44
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-4(1)(2), दिल्ली
45
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-4(2), दिल्ली
46
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-4(2)(1), दिल्ली
47
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (एन.ए.एफ.ए.सी.)-4(2)(2), दिल्ली
मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त (केन्रीय), नई दिल्ली
48
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त्त्त (केंरीय - 1), नई दिल्ली
49
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त्त्त (केंरीय - 2), नई दिल्ली
50
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त्त्त (केंरीय - 3), नई दिल्ली
आयकर मिाजनिेिालय (सतकचता), नई दिल्ली
51
कायाचलय आयकर मिाजनिेिक (सतकचता), नई दिल्ली
52
कायाचलय अपर आयकर मिाजनिेिक (सतकचता)(उत्तरी क्षेत्र), नई दिल्ली
आयकर जनिेिालय (जवजि एवं अनुसंिान), नई दिल्ली
53
कायाचलय आयकर जनिेिक (जवजि एवं अनुसंिान), नई दिल्ली
996
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
आयकर जनिेिालय (पद्धजत), नई दिल्ली
54
कायाचलय आयकर जनिेिक (पद्धजत), नई दिल्ली
आयकर जनिेिालय (आिाररक संरर्ना), नई दिल्ली
55.
कायाचलय आयकर जनिेिक(आिाररक संरर्ना), नई दिल्ली
प्रिान आयकर मिाजनिेिालय (प्रजिक्षण), नई दिल्ली
56.
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर मिाजनिेिक (प्रजिक्षण), नई दिल्ली
प्रिान मुख् य आयकर आयुक्त (अंतराचष् रीय करािान), दिल्ली
57
कायाचलय प्रिान मुख् य आयकर आयुक्त (अंतराचष् रीय करािान), दिल्ली
58
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (मुख्यालय), दिल्ली
59
कायाचलय आयकर अपर आयुक्त (मुख्यालय), दिल्ली
60
कायाचलय आयकर अपर आयुक्त (ओएसडी), दिल्ली
61
कायाचलय आयकर उपायुक्त (मुख्यालय), दिल्ली
62
कायाचलय आयकर उपायुक्त (ओएसडी), दिल्ली
63
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (मुख्यालय), दिल्ली
64
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (ओएसडी), दिल्ली
65
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त(अंतराचष् रीय करािान)-1, दिल् ली
66
कायाचलय आयकर उपायुक्त् त (मुख्यालय), दिल्ली
67
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (मुख्यालय), दिल्ली
68
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी, (टीआरओ), दिल्ली
69
कायाचलय आयकर अपर आयुक्त(अंत.करा.), रेंि-1(1),दिल्ली
70
कायाचलय आयकर सिायक आयुक्त(अंत.करा.) ,सर्कचल-1(1)(1), दिल्ली
71
कायाचलय आयकर सिायक आयुक्त (अंत.करा.), सर्कचल-1(1)(2), दिल्ली
72
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी(टीडीएस)(अंत.करा.) वाडच-1(1)(1), दिल्ली
73
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी(टीडीएस)(अंत.करा.) वाडच-1(1)(2), दिल्ली
74
कायाचलय आयकर अपर आयुक्त(अंत.करा.), रेंि-1(2),दिल्ली
75
कायाचलय आयकर सिायक आयुक्त(अंत.करा.) ,सर्कचल-1(2)(1), दिल्ली
76
कायाचलय आयकर सिायक आयुक्त(अंत.करा.) ,सर्कचल-1(2)(2), दिल्ली
77
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी(टीडीएस)(अंत.करा.), वाडच-1(2)(1), दिल्ली
78
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी(टीडीएस)(अंत.करा.), वाडच-1(2)(2), दिल्ली
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
997
79
कायाचलय आयकर अपर आयुक्त(अंत.करा.) रेंि-1(3), दिल्ली
80
कायाचलय आयकर सिायक आयुक्त(अंत.करा.) ,सर्कचल-1(3)(1), दिल्ली
81
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी(टीडीएस)(अंत.करा.),वाडच-1(3)(1), दिल्ली
82
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी(टीडीएस)(अंत.करा.),वाडच-1(3)(2), दिल्ली
83
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त(अंतराचष् रीय करािान)-2, दिल् ली
84
कायाचलय आयकर उपायुक्त(अंत.करा.)(मुख्यालय), दिल्ली
85
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (मुख्यालय)
86
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (न्याजयक), दिल्ली
87
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (टीआरओ), दिल्ली
88
कायाचलय आयकर अपर आयुक्त(अंत.करा.), रेंि-2(1),दिल्ली
89
कायाचलय आयकर उपायुक्त(अंत.करा.), सर्कचल-2(1)(1),दिल्ली
90
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी, वाडच-2(1)(1),दिल्ली
91
कायाचलय आयकर सिायक आयुक्त , सर्कचल-2(1)(2),दिल्ली
92
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी, वाडच-2(1)(2),दिल्ली
93
कायाचलय आयकर अपर आयुक्त(अंत.करा.) रेंि-2(2),दिल्ली
94
कायाचलय आयकर उपायुक्त(अंत.करा.), सर्कचल-2(2)(1),दिल्ली
95
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी, वाडच-2(2)(1),दिल्ली
96
कायाचलय आयकर उपायुक्त(अंत.करा.), सर्कचल-2(2)(2),दिल्ली
97
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी, वाडच-2(2)(2),दिल्ली
98
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त(अंतराचष् रीय करािान)-3, दिल् ली
99
कायाचलय आयकर अपर आयुक्त(अंत.करा.), रेंि 3(1), दिल्ली
100
कायाचलय आयकर उपायुक्त(अंत.करा.)(मुख्यालय), दिल्ली
101
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी(अंत.करा.) (मुख्यालय), दिल्ली
102
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (न्याजयक) , दिल्ली
103
कायाचलय आयकर उपायुक्त(अंत.करा.), सर्कचल-3(1)(1), दिल्ली
104
कायाचलय आयकर उपायुक्त(अंत.करा.), सर्कचल-3(1)(2), दिल्ली
105
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी, वाडच 3(1)(1), दिल्ली
106
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी, वाडच 3(1)(2), दिल्ली
998
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
107
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी/नोडल अजिकारी (टीआरओ), दिल्ली
108
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (मूल्य अंतरण)-1, दिल्ली
109
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (मुख्यालय), दिल्ली
110
कायाचलय आयकर संयुक्त् त आयुक्त(मू.अंत.)-1(1), दिल्ली
111
कायाचलय आयकर उपायुक्त(मू.अंत.)-1(1)(1), दिल्ली
112
कायाचलय आयकर उपायुक्त(मू.अंत.)-1(1)(2), दिल्ली
113
कायाचलय आयकर संयुक्त् त आयुक्त(मू.अंत.)- 1(2), दिल्ली
114
कायाचलय आयकर उपायुक्त(मू.अंत.)-1(2)(1), दिल्ली
115
कायाचलय आयकर उपायुक्त(मू.अंत.)- 1(2)(2), दिल्ली
116
कायाचलय आयकर अपर आयुक्त(मू.अंत.)-1(3), दिल्ली
117
कायाचलय आयकर सिायक आयुक्त(मू.अंत.) -1(3)(1), दिल्ली
118
कायाचलय आयकर सिायक आयुक्त(मू.अंत.) -1(3)(2), दिल्ली
119
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (मूल्य अंतरण)-2, दिल्ली
120
कायाचलय आयकर अपर आयुक्त(मू.अंत.)-2(1), दिल्ली
121
कायाचलय आयकर उपायुक्त(मू.अंत.)-2(1)(1), दिल्ली
122
कायाचलय आयकर सिायक आयुक्त(मू.अंत.) - 2(1)(2), दिल्ली
123
कायाचलय आयकर अपर आयुक्त(मू.अंत.)-2(2), दिल्ली
124
कायाचलय आयकर सिायक आयुक्त(मू.अंत.) -2(2)(1), दिल्ली
125
कायाचलय आयकर सिायक आयुक्त(मू.अंत.) -2(2)(2), दिल्ली
126
कायाचलय आयकर अपर आयुक्त(मू.अंत.)-2(3), दिल्ली
127
कायाचलय आयकर सिायक आयुक्त(मू.अंत.) -2(3)(1), दिल्ली
128
कायाचलय आयकर सिायक आयुक्त(मू.अंत.)-2(3)(2), दिल्ली
129
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (मू.अंत.) (मुख्यालय),दिल् ली
130
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (मूल्य अंतरण)-3, दिल्ली
131
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी(मू.अंत.) (मुख्यालय), दिल्ली
132
कायाचलय आयकर अपर आयुक्त(मू.अंत.)-3(1), दिल्ली
133
कायाचलय आयकर सिायक आयुक्त(मू.अंत.) -3(1)(1), दिल्ली
134
कायाचलय आयकर सिायक आयुक्त(मू.अंत.) -3(1)(2), दिल्ली
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
999
135
कायाचलय आयकर अपर आयुक्त(मू.अंत.)-3(2), दिल्ली
136
कायाचलय आयकर सिायक आयुक्त (मू.अंत.)-3(2)(1), दिल्ली
137
कायाचलय आयकर उपायुक्त् त (मू.अंत.)-3(2)(2), दिल्ली
138
कायाचलय आयकर अपर आयुक्त(मू.अंत.)-3(3), दिल्ली
139
कायाचलय आयकर उपायुक्त(मू.अंत.)-3(3)(1), दिल्ली
140
कायाचलय आयकर उपायुक्त(मू.अंत.)-3(3)(2), दिल्ली
141
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (अजिम मूल्य करार)-1, दिल्ली
142
कायाचलय आयकर अपर आयुक्त(अ.मू.क.)-1, दिल्ली
143
कायाचलय आयकर उपायुक्त आयुक्त(अ.मू.क.)-1(1), दिल्ली
144
कायाचलय आयकर उपायुक्त आयुक्त(अ.मू.क.)-1(2), दिल्ली
145
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी(अ.मू.क.)(मुख् यालय),दिल् ली
146
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (अजिम मूल्य करार)-2, दिल्ली
147
कायाचलय आयकर अपर आयुक्त(अ.मू.क.)-2, दिल्ली
148
कायाचलय आयकर उपायुक्त(अ.मू.क.)-2(1), दिल्ली
149
कायाचलय आयकर सिायक आयुक्त(अ.मू.क.)-2(2), दिल्ली
150
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी(अ.मू.क.)(मुख्यालय), दिल्ली
151
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (जववाि समािान पटल)-1, दिल्ली-1
152
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (जववाि समािान पटल)-1, दिल्ली-2
153
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (जववाि समािान पटल)-1, दिल्ली-3
154
कायाचलय सजर्व/आयकर उपायुक्त् त, आयकर उपायुक्त (जववाि समािान पटल)-1, दिल्ली
155
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त(जववाि समािान पटल-2), दिल्ली-1
156
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (जववाि समािान पटल-2), दिल्ली-2
157
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (जववाि समािान पटल-2), दिल्ली-3
158
कायाचलय आयकर उपायुक्त/सजर्व (जववाि समािान पटल-2), दिल्ली
159
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (डी.आर.)(बी.ए.आर.)-1, दिल्ली
160
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (डी.आर.)(बी.ए.आर.)-2, दिल्ली
161
कायाचलय आयकर अपर आयुक्त (डी.आर.)(बी.ए.आर.)-1, दिल्ली
162
कायाचलय आयकर अपर आयुक्त (डी.आर.)(बी.ए.आर.)-2, दिल्ली
1000
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
163
कायाचलय आयकर उपायुक्त (डी.आर.)(बी.ए.आर.)-1, दिल्ली
164
कायाचलय आयकर उपायुक्त (डी.आर.)(बी.ए.आर.)-2, दिल्ली
165
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (डी.आर.)(बी.ए.आर.), दिल्ली
166
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (अपील)-42, दिल्ली
167
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (अपील)-43, दिल्ली
168
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (अपील)-44, दिल्ली
प्रिान आयकर मिाजनिेिालय (मानव संसािन जवकास), नई दिल्ली
169
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर मिाजनिेिक (मानव संसािन जवकास), नई दिल्ली
[फाा. सं. ई-30018/1/2024- डीडी (ओएल) डीओआर]
जिजिर िमाच, संयुक्त जनिेिक (रािभाषा)
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)
New Delhi, the 18th February, 2025
S.O. 360.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the
Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies, the following offices under Department of Revenue where
more than 80% staff has acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:
The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi
1
O/o The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi
2
O/o The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Delhi
3
O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS)-1, Delhi
4
O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS)-2, Delhi
5
O/o The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Delhi
Principal Directorate General of Income Tax (Admn & TPS), Delhi
6
O/o The Principal Directorate General of Income Tax (Admn & TPS), New Delhi
7
O/o The Directorate of Income Tax (Tax Payer Services-I), New Delhi
8
O/o The Directorate of Income Tax (Tax Payer Services-II), New Delhi
9
O/o The Directorate of Income Tax (Infrastructure), New Delhi
10
O/o The Directorate of Income Tax (Organization & Management Services), New Delhi
11
O/o The Directorate of Income Tax (Expenditure Budget), New Delhi
12
O/o The Directorate of Income Tax (R&S Wing.), New Delhi
13
O/o The Directorate of Income Tax (P.R. & P.P), New Delhi
The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC), Delhi
14
O/o The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC), Delhi
15
O/o Income-tax Officer (NaFAC) (HQ), Delhi
16
O/o The Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-1, Delhi
17
Income-tax Officer (NaFAC) (HQ), Office of the Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-1, Delhi
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1001
18
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-1(1), Delhi
19
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-1(1)(1), Delhi
20
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-1(1)(2), Delhi
21
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-1(2), Delhi
22
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-1(2)(1), Delhi
23
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-1(2)(2), Delhi
24
O/o The Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-2, Delhi
25
O/o Income-tax Officer (NaFAC) (HQ), Delhi
26
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-2(1), Delhi
27
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-2(1)(1), Delhi
28
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-2(1)(2), Delhi
29
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-2(2), Delhi
30
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-2(2)(1), Delhi
31
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-2(2)(2), Delhi
32
O/o The Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-3, Delhi
33
O/o Income-tax Officer (HQ), (NaFAC)-3, Delhi
34
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-3(1), Delhi
35
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-3(1)(1), Delhi
36
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-3(1)(2), Delhi
37
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-3(2), Delhi
38
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-3(2)(1), Delhi
39
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-3(2)(2), Delhi
40
O/o The Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-4, Delhi
41
O/o Income-tax Officer (HQ), (NaFAC)-4, Delhi
42
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-4(1), Delhi
43
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-4(1)(1), Delhi
44
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-4(1)(2), Delhi
45
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-4(2), Delhi
46
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-4(2)(1), Delhi
47
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC)-4(2)(2), Delhi
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), New Delhi
48
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax(Central - 1) New Delhi
49
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax(Central - 2) New Delhi
50
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax(Central - 3) New Delhi
Directorate General of Income Tax (Vigilance), New Delhi
51
O/o The Director General of Income Tax (Vigilance), New Delhi
52
O/o The Additional Director General of Income Tax (Vigilance)(Northern Region), New Delhi
Directorate of Income Tax (Legal & Research), New Delhi
53
O/o The Director of Income Tax (Legal & Research), New Delhi
Directorate of Income of Tax (System), New Delhi
54
O/o The Director of Income of Tax (System), New Delhi
1002
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Directorate of Income Tax( Infrastructure), New Delhi
55.
O/o The Directorate of Income Tax( Infrastructure), New Delhi
Principal Directorate General (Training), New Delhi
56.
O/o Principal Directorate General (Training), New Delhi
O/o The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax (International Taxation), Delhi
57
O/o The Pr.CCIT (IT), Delhi
58
O/o The CIT(Hqrs.), Delhi
59
O/o The Addl. CIT(Hqrs.), Delhi
60
O/o The Addl. CIT(OSD), Delhi
61
O/o The DCIT (Hq.), Delhi
62
O/o The DCIT (OSD), Delhi
63
O/o The ITO (HQ), Delhi
64
O/o The ITO (OSD), Delhi
65
O/o The CIT (International Taxation)-1, Delhi
66
O/o The DCIT (Hq.), Delhi
67
O/o The ITO (Hq), Delhi
68
O/o The ITO, (TRO), Delhi
69
O/o The Addl. CIT(IT), Range-1(1), Delhi
70
O/o The ACIT(IT), Circle -1(1)(1), Delhi
71
O/o The ACIT(IT), Circle -1(1)(2), Delhi
72
O/o The ITO TDS(IT), W-1(1)(1), Delhi
73
O/o The ITO TDS(IT),W- 1(1)(2), Delhi
74
O/o The Addl. CIT(IT), Range-1(2), Delhi
75
O/o The ACIT(IT), Circle -1(2)(1), Delhi
76
O/o The ACIT(IT), Circle -1(2)(2), Delhi
77
O/o The ITO TDS(IT), W-1(2)(1), Delhi
78
O/o The ITO TDS(IT), W-1(2)(2), Delhi
79
O/o The Addl. CIT(IT), Range-1(3), Delhi
80
O/o The ACIT(IT), Circle -1(3)(1), Delhi
81
O/o The ITO TDS (IT), 1(3)(1), Delhi
82
O/o The ITO TDS(IT), Ward-1(3)(2), Delhi
83
O/o The CIT (International Taxation)-2, Delhi
84
O/o The DCIT(IT)(Hq.), Delhi
85
O/o The ITO (Hqrs.), Delhi
86
O/o The ITO (Judl.), Delhi
87
O/o The ITO (TRO), Delhi
88
O/o The Addl. CIT(IT), Range-2(1), Delhi
89
O/o The DCIT(IT), Circle -2(1)(1), Delhi
90
O/o The ITO, W-2 (1) (1), Delhi
91
O/o The ACIT(IT), Circle -2(1)(2), Delhi
92
O/o The ITO, W-2(1)(2), Delhi
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1003
93
O/o The Addl. CIT(IT), Range-2(2), Delhi
94
O/o The DCIT(IT), Circle -2(2)(1), Delhi
95
O/o The ITO, W-2(2)(1), Delhi
96
O/o The DCIT(IT), Circle -2(2)(2), Delhi
97
O/o The ITO, Ward-2(2)(2) Delhi
98
O/o The CIT (International Taxation)-3, Delhi
99
O/o The Addl. CIT(IT), Range-3(1), Delhi
100
O/o The DCIT(IT)(Hq.),Delhi
101
O/o The ITO(IT) (Hqrs.), Delhi
102
O/o The ITO (Judl.), Delhi
103
O/o The DCIT(IT) Circle-3(1)(1), Delhi
104
O/o The DCIT(IT) Circle-3(1)(2), Delhi
105
O/o The ITO,W-3(1)(1) , Delhi
106
O/o The ITO W-3(1)(2) , Delhi
107
O/o The ITO/ Nodal Officer (TRO) , Delhi
108
O/o The CIT(TP)-1, Delhi
109
O/o The ITO(Hq.), Delhi
110
O/o The JCIT(TP)-1(1) , Delhi
111
O/o The DCIT (TP)-1(1)(1), Delhi
112
O/o The DCIT (TP)-1(1)(2), Delhi
113
O/o The JCIT(TP)-1(2), Delhi
114
O/o The DCIT(TP)-1(2)(1), Delhi
115
O/o The DCIT (TP)-1(2)(2) Delhi
116
O/o The Addl. CIT(TP)-1(3)Delhi
117
O/o The ACIT TP-1(3)(1), Delhi
118
O/o The ACIT(TP)-1(3)(2), Delhi
119
O/o The CIT(TP)-2, Delhi
120
O/o The Addl. CIT(TP)-2(1), Delhi
121
O/o The DCIT (TP)-2(1)(1), Delhi
122
O/o The ACIT (TP)-2(1)(2), Delhi
123
O/o The Addl. CIT (TP)-2(2), Delhi
124
O/o The ACIT (TP)-2(2)(1), Delhi
125
O/o The ACIT (TP)-2(2)(2), Delhi
126
O/o The Addl. CIT(TP)-2(3), Delhi
127
O/o The ACIT (TP)-2(3)(1), Delhi
128
O/o The ACIT (TP)-2(3)(2), Delhi
129
O/o The ITO(TP)(Hq.), Delhi
130
O/o The CIT(TP)-3, Delhi
131
O/o The ITO(TP)(Hq.), Delhi
132
O/o The Addl. CIT(TP)-3(1), Delhi
133
O/o The ACIT, TPO-3(1)(1), Delhi
1004
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
[F. No. E-30018/1/2024- DD (OL) DOR]
SHISHIR SHARMA, Jt. Director (OL)
134
O/o The ACIT, TPO-3(1)(2), Delhi
135
O/o The Addl. CIT(TPO)-3(2), Delhi
136
O/o The ACIT, TPO-3(2)(1), Delhi
137
O/o The DCIT, TPO-3(2)(2), Delhi
138
O/o The Addl. CIT(TPO)3(3), Delhi
139
O/o The DCIT, TPO-3(3)(1), Delhi
140
O/o The DCIT, TPO-3(3)(2), Delhi
141
O/o The CIT(APA), Delhi-1
142
O/o The Addl. CIT(APA)-1, Delhi
143
O/o The DCIT(APA)-1(1), Delhi
144
O/o The DCIT(APA)-1(2), Delhi
145
O/o The ITO(APA)(Hq.) Delhi
146
O/o The CIT(APA), Delhi-2
147
O/o The Addl. CIT(APA)-2, Delhi
148
O/o The DCIT(APA)-2(1), Delhi
149
O/o The ACIT(APA)-2(2), Delhi
150
O/o The ITO(APA)(Hq.) Delhi
151
O/o The CIT(DRP-1), Delhi-1
152
O/o The CIT(DRP-1), Delhi-2
153
O/o The CIT(DRP-1), Delhi-3
154
O/o The DCIT/Secretary(DRP-1), Delhi
155
O/o The CIT(DRP-2), Delhi-1
156
O/o The CIT(DRP-2), Delhi-2
157
O/o The CIT(DRP-2), Delhi-3
158
O/o The DCIT/Secretary(DRP-2), Delhi
159
O/o The CIT(DR)(BAR)-1, Delhi
160
O/o The CIT(DR)(BAR)-2, Delhi
161
O/o The Addl. CIT(DR)(BAR)-1, Delhi
162
O/o The Addl. CIT(DR)(BAR)-2, Delhi
163
O/o The DCIT DR(BAR)-1,Delhi
164
O/o The DCIT DR(BAR)-2,Delhi
165
O/o The ITO DR(BAR),Delhi
166
O/o The CIT(A) , Delhi-42
167
O/o The CIT(A) , Delhi-43
168
O/o The CIT(A) , Delhi-44
The Principal Directorate General of Income Tax (Human Resource Development), New Delhi
169
O/o The Principal Director General of Income Tax (Human Resource Development), New Delhi
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1005
नई दिल्ली, 7 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 361.—केन्र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम, 1976 के जनयम 10
के उप-जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में रािस्ट्व जवभाग के केन्रीय अप्रत्यक्ष कर एवं सीमािुल्क बोडच के अिीन, जनम्नजलजखत
कायाचलयों, जिनके 80 प्रजतित से अजिक कमचर्ाररयों ने जिन्िी का कायच सािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जलया िै, को अजिसूजर्त
करती िै:
1. लेखापरीक्षा मिाजनिेिालय, नई दिल्ली
2. केन्रीय माल एवं सेवा कर, पुणे-II, आयुक्तालय
3. केन्रीय माल एवं सेवा कर अपील आयुक्तालय, र्ंडीगढ़
[फाा. सं ई-11017/3/2017- जिन्िी-2-अजिसूर्ना]
जिजिर िमाच, संयुक्त जनिेिक (रा. भा.)
New Delhi, the 7th March, 2025
S.O. 361.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of
the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies, the following offices under Central Board of
Indirect Taxes and Customs, Department of revenue where more than 80% staff has acquired the working knowledge
of Hindi:
1. Directorate General of Audit, New Delhi
2. Central Goods and Service Tax, Pune-II, Commissionerate
3. Central Goods and Service Tax Appeal Commissionerate, Chandigarh
[F. No. E-11017/3/2017- Hindi-2-Notification]
SHISHIR SHARMA, Jt. Director (OL)
नई दिल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 362.—केन्र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम, 1976 के जनयम 10
के उपजनयम (4) के अनुसरण में रािस्ट्व जवभाग के अिीन, जनम्नजलजखत कायाचलयों, जिनके 80 प्रजतित से अजिक
कमचर्ाररयों ने जिन्िी का कायच सािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जलया िै, को अजिसूजर्त करती िै:
प्रिान मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त, लखनऊ
1
कायाचलय प्रिान मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त, लखनऊ
2
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त-1, लखनऊ
3
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि- 1, लखनऊ
4
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि- 3, लखनऊ
5
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त-1, लखनऊ
6
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त-3, लखनऊ
7
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 1(1), लखनऊ
8
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 1(4), लखनऊ
1006
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
9
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 2(1), लखनऊ
10
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 2(4), उन्नाव
11
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 4(1), लखनऊ
12
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 4(3), लखनऊ
13
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 3(1), लखनऊ
14
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 3(5), लखनऊ
15
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 5(1), लखनऊ
16
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 5(4),बाराबंकी
17
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 6(1), लखनऊ
18
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 6(2), लखनऊ
19
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (टी.डी.एस.), लखनऊ
20
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (टी.डी.एस.), लखनऊ
21
कायाचलय उप आयकर आयुक्त (टी.डी.एस.), लखनऊ
22
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (टी.डी.एस.), लखनऊ
23
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी, (टी.डी.एस.), फैिाबाि
24
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (टी.डी.एस.), सुल्तानपुर
25
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (टी.डी.एस.), प्रयागराि
26
कायाचलय उप आयकर आयुक्त (टी.डी.एस.), प्रयागराि
27
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (टी.डी.एस.), प्रयागराि
28
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (टी.डी.एस.)-1, वाराणसी
29
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (टी.डी.एस.)-2, वाराणसी
30
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (टी.डी.एस.), गोरखपुर
31
कायाचलय संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (टी.डी.एस.), बरेली
32
कायाचलय सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (टी.डी.एस.), बरेली
33
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (टी.डी.एस.), बरेली
34
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (टी.डी.एस.), मुरािाबाि
35
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (टी.डी.एस.), सीतापुर
36
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (छूट), लखनऊ
37
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (छूट), लखनऊ
38
कायाचलय उप आयकर आयुक्त (छूट), लखनऊ
39
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (छूट), लखनऊ
40
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (छूट), इलािाबाि
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1007
41
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (छूट), बरेली
42
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (छूट), वाराणसी
43
कायाचलय आयकर जनिेिक (आई. एण्ड सी.आई.), लखनऊ
44
कायाचलय संयुक्त आयकर जनिेिक(आई. एण्ड सी.आई.),लखनऊ
45
कायाचलय सिायक आयकर जनिेिक(आई. एण्ड सी.आई.),लखनऊ
46
कायाचलय आयकर जनिेिक (आई. एण्ड सी.आई.), लखनऊ
47
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी(आई. एण्ड सी.आई.),गोरखपुर
48
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी(आई. एण्ड सी.आई.),मुरािाबाि
49
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी(आई. एण्ड सी.आई.),बरेली
50
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी(आई. एण्ड सी.आई.),वाराणसी
51
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी(आई. एण्ड सी.आई.),प्रयागराि
52
कायाचलय सिायक आयकर जनिेिक(आई. एण्ड सी.आई.),प्रयागराि(अजतररक्त प्रभार)
53
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (आ.अपी.अजि.) 1व2
मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त, इलािाबाि
1
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त, इलािाबाि
2
कायाचलय आयकर अपर/संयुक्त आयुक्त, रेंि- । इलािाबाि
3
कायाचलय आयकर उप/सिायक आयुक्त सर्कचल-1 इलािाबाि
4
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी, वाडच- 1(1) इलािाबाि
5
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 1(3) इलािाबाि
6
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 2(1) इलािाबाि
7
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच 2(4) फतेिपुर
8
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच 2(5) कौिाम्बी
9
कायाचलय आयकर अपर/संयुक्त आयुक्त, रेंि-। वाराणसी
10
कायाचलय आयकर उप/सिायक आयुक्त, सर्कचल-1 वाराणसी
11
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच-1(1) वाराणसी
12
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच-2(1) वाराणसी
13
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच 3(1) वाराणसी
14
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 1(5) भिोिी
15
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 2(4) बजलया
16
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 3(5) गािीपुर
17
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 3(2) जमिाचपुर
18
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच 3(3) सोनभर
1008
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
19
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त, गोरखपुर
20
कायाचलय आयकर अपर/संयुक्त आयुक्त, रेंि- । गोरखपुर
21
कायाचलय आयकर उप/सिायक आयुक्त, सर्कचल-1 गोरखपुर
22
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी, वाडच- 1(1) गोरखपुर
23
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 2(1) गोरखपुर
24
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 1(4) मिारािगंि
25
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच 2(4) कुिीनगर
26
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच 3(1) आिमगढ़
27
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच-3(3) मऊ
28
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच-3(4) िेवररया
29
कायाचलय आयकर अपर/संयुक्त आयुक्त, रेंि-। फैिाबाि
30
कायाचलय आयकर उप/सिायक आयुक्त, सर्कचल-1 फैिाबाि
31
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी, 1 फैिाबाि
32
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी, अंबेडकर नगर
33
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी, िौनपुर
34
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी, सुल्तानपुर
35
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी, अमेठी
36
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी, रायबरेली
37
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी, प्रतापगढ़
38
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी, गोंडा
39
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी, बस्ट्ती
40
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी, बिराइर्
41
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त, बरेली
42
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (मुख्यालय)प्रिासन
43
कायाचलय आयकर अपर/संयुक्त आयुक्त, रेंि-। बरेली
44
कायाचलय आयकर उप/सिायक आयुक्त, सर्कचल-1 बरेली
45
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच-1(1) बरेली
46
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच-1(4) िािििांपुर
47
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 2(2) बरेली
48
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच-2(4) पीलीभीत
49
कायाचलय आयकर अपर/संयुक्त आयुक्त, रेंि-3 सीतापुर
50
कायाचलय आयकर उप/सिायक आयुक्त, सर्कचल-3 सीतापुर
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1009
51
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 3(1) सीतापुर
52
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच-(2) िरिोई
53
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच 3(4) लखीमपुर खीरी
54
कायाचलय आयकर अपर आयुक्त, रेंि-1 मुरािाबाि
55
कायाचलय आयकर उप/सिायक आयुक्त, सर्कचल-1 मुरािाबाि
56
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 1(1) मुरािाबाि
57
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 1(3) रामपुर
58
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच-1(5) संभल
59
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच-2(1) मुरािाबाि
60
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 2(3) बिायूं
61
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच-2(5) र्ंिौसी
62
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच-3(1) निीबाबाि
63
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच-3(3) जबिनौर
64
कायाचलय आयकर अपर/संयुक्त आयुक्त, रेंि-1 िल्द्वानी
65
कायाचलय आयकर उप/सिायक आयुक्त, सर्कचल-1 िल्द्वानी
66
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच-2(1) िल्द्वानी
67
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 1(4) रुरपुर
68
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 2(1) कािीपुर
69
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच-2(4) बािपुर
70
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 2(5) रामनगर
71
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 3(1) नैनीताल
72
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 3(2) अल्मोड़ा
73
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 3(4) जपथौरागढ़
74
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी वाडच- 3(5) खटीमा
75
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (अपील यूजनट-1) इलािाबाि
76
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (अपील यूजनट-1) वाराणसी
77
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (अपील यूजनट-1) गोरखपुर
78
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (अपील यूजनट-1) बरेली
79
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (अपील यूजनट-1) मुरािाबाि
80
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (अपील यूजनट-1) िल्द्वानी
मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.), बरेली
1
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.) बरेली
1010
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1,फैिाबाि
3
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त आर0ई0ए0सी0)(ए.यू.)-1(1), फैिाबाि
4
कायाचलय उप/सिा0आ0आ0(आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(1)(1), फैिाबाि
5
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(1)(2), फैिाबाि
6
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(1)(3), फैिाबाि
7
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(1)(4), फैिाबाि
8
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(1)(5), फैिाबाि
9
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(1)(6), फैिाबाि
10
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(2), फैिाबाि
11
कायाचलय उप/सिा0आ0आ0(आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(2)(1), फैिाबाि
12
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(2)(2), फैिाबाि
13
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(2)(3), फैिाबाि
14
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(2)(4), फैिाबाि
15
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(2)(5), फैिाबाि
16
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(2)(6), फैिाबाि
17
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(3), फैिाबाि
18
कायाचलय उप/सिा0आ0आ0(आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(3)(1), फैिाबाि
19
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(3)(2), फैिाबाि
20
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(3)(3), फैिाबाि
21
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(3)(4), फैिाबाि
22
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(3)(5), फैिाबाि
23
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(3)(6), फैिाबाि
24
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(4), फैिाबाि
25
कायाचलय उप/सिा0आ0आ0(आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(4)(1), फैिाबाि
26
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(4)(2), फैिाबाि
27
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(4)(3), फैिाबाि
28
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(4)(4), फैिाबाि
29
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(4)(5), फैिाबाि
प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)ए0यू0)-1, िल्द्वानी
1
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1, िल्द्वानी
2
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(1), िल्द्वानी
3
कायाचलय उप/सिा0आ0आ0(आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(1)(1), िल्द्वानी
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1011
4
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(1)(2), िल्द्वानी
5
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(1)(3), िल्द्वानी
6
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(1)(4), िल्द्वानी
7
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(1)(5), िल्द्वानी
8
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(1)(6), िल्द्वानी
9
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(2), िल्द्वानी
10
कायाचलय उप/सिा0आ0आ0(आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(2)(1), िल्द्वानी
11
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(2)(2), िल्द्वानी
12
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(2)(3), िल्द्वानी
13
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(2)(4), िल्द्वानी
14
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(2)(5), िल्द्वानी
15
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(2)(6), िल्द्वानी
16
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(3), िल्द्वानी
17
कायाचलय उप/सिा0आ0आ0(आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(3)(1), िल्द्वानी
18
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(3)(2), िल्द्वानी
19
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(3)(3), िल्द्वानी
20
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(3)(4), िल्द्वानी
21
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(3)(5), िल्द्वानी
22
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(3)(6), िल्द्वानी
23
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(4), िल्द्वानी
24
कायाचलय उप/सिा0आ0आ0(आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(4)(1), िल्द्वानी
25
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(4)(2), िल्द्वानी
26
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(4)(3), िल्द्वानी
27
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(4)(4), िल्द्वानी
28
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(4)(5), िल्द्वानी
29
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(4)(6), िल्द्वानी
प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1, लखनऊ
1
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1, लखनऊ
2
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(1), लखनऊ
3
कायाचलय उप/सिा0आ0आ0(आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(1)(1), लखनऊ
4
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(1)(2), लखनऊ
5
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(1)(3), लखनऊ
1012
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
6
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(1)(4), लखनऊ
7
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(1)(5), लखनऊ
8
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(1)(6), लखनऊ
9
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(2), लखनऊ
10
कायाचलय उप/सिा0आ0आ0(आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(2)(1), लखनऊ
11
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(2)(2), लखनऊ
12
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(2)(3), लखनऊ
13
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(2)(4), लखनऊ
14
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(2)(5), लखनऊ
15
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(2)(6), लखनऊ
16
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(3), लखनऊ
17
कायाचलय उप/सिा0आ0आ0(आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(3)(1), लखनऊ
18
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(3)(2), लखनऊ
19
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(3)(3), लखनऊ
20
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(3)(4), लखनऊ
21
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(3)(5), लखनऊ
22
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(3)(6), लखनऊ
23
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(4), लखनऊ
24
कायाचलय उप/सिा0आ0आ0(आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(4)(1), लखनऊ
25
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(4)(2), लखनऊ
26
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(4)(3), लखनऊ
27
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(4)(4), लखनऊ
28
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(4)(5), लखनऊ
29
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(ए.यू.)-1(4)(6), लखनऊ
प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(वी0यू0)-1, मुरािाबाि
1
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(वी0यू0)-1, मुरािाबाि
2
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(वी0यू0)-1(1), मुरािाबाि
3
कायाचलय उप/सिा0आ0आ0(आर.ई.ए.सी.)(वी0यू0)-1(1)(1), मुरािाबाि
4
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(वी0यू0)-1(1)(2), मुरािाबाि
5
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(वी0यू0)-1(1)(3), मुरािाबि
6
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(वी0यू0)-1(1)(4), मुरािाबाि
7
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(वी0यू0)-1(1)(5), मुरािाबाि
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1013
8
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(वी0यू0)-1(1)(6), मुरािाबि
9
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(वी0यू0)-1(2), मुरािाबाि
10
कायाचलय उप/सिा0आ0आ0(आर.ई.ए.सी.)(वी0यू0)-1(2)(1), मुरािाबाि
11
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(वी0यू0)-1(2)(2), मुरािाबाि
12
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(वी0यू0)-1(2)(3), मुरािाबि
13
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(वी0यू0)-1(2)(4), मुरािाबाि
14
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(वी0यू0)-1(2)(5), मुरािाबाि
15
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(वी0यू0)-1(2)(6), मुरािाबि
16
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(वी0यू0)-1(3), मुरािाबाि
17
कायाचलय उप/सिा0आ0आ0(आर.ई.ए.सी.)(वी0यू0)-1(3)(1), मुरािाबाि
18
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(वी0यू0)-1(3)(2), मुरािाबाि
19
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(वी0यू0)-1(3)(3), मुरािाबि
20
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(वी0यू0)-1(3)(4), मुरािाबाि
21
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(वी0यू0)-1(3)(5), मुरािाबाि
22
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(वी0यू0)-1(3)(6), मुरािाबि
प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(आर0यू0)-1, वाराणसी
1
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(आर0यू0)-1, वाराणसी
2
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(आर0यू0)-1(1), वाराणसी
3
कायाचलय उप/सिा0आ0आ0(आर.ई.ए.सी.)(आर0यू0)-1(1)(1), वाराणसी
4
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(आर0यू0)-1(1)(2), वाराणसी
5
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(आर0यू0)-1(1)(3), वाराणसी
6
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(आर0यू0)-1(1)(4), वाराणसी
7
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(आर0यू0)-1(1)(5), वाराणसी
8
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(आर0यू0)-1(1)(6), वाराणसी
9
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(आर0यू0)-1(2), वाराणसी
10
कायाचलय उप/सिा0आ0आ0(आर.ई.ए.सी.)(आर0यू0)-1(2)(1), वाराणसी
11
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(आर0यू0)-1(2)(2), वाराणसी
12
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(आर0यू0)-1(2)(3), वाराणसी
13
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(आर0यू0)-1(2)(4), वाराणसी
14
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(आर0यू0)-1(2)(5), वाराणसी
15
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(आर0यू0)-1(2)(6), वाराणसी
16
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(आर0यू0)-1(3), वाराणसी
1014
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
17
कायाचलय उप/सिा0आ0आ0(आर.ई.ए.सी.)(आर0यू0)-1(3)(1), वाराणसी
18
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(आर0यू0)-1(3)(2), वाराणसी
19
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(आर0यू0)-1(3)(3), वाराणसी
20
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(आर0यू0)-1(3)(4), वाराणसी
21
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(आर0यू0)-1(3)(5), वाराणसी
22
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (आर.ई.ए.सी.)(आर0यू0)-1(3)(6), वाराणसी
मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त बरेली प्रभार
1
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त, बरेली
2
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1,फैिाबाि
3
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(1),फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत गोंडा
4
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(1)(1), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत गोंडा
5
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(1)(2), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत फैिाबाि
6
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(1)(3), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत फैिाबाि
7
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(1)(4), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत फैिाबाि
8
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(1)(5), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत गोरखपुर
9
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(1)(6), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत गोरखपुर
10
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(2), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत गोरखपुर
11
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(2)(1), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत गोरखपुर
12
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(2)(2), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत गोरखपुर
13
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(2)(3), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत गोरखपुर
14
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(2)(4), फैिाबािजस्ट्थत गोरखपुर
15
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(2)(5), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत गोरखपुर
16
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(2)(6), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत गोरखपुर
17
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(3), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत सुल्तानपुर
18
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(3)(1), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत सुल्तानपुर
19
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(3)(2), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत सोनभर
20
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(3)(3), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत सोनभर
21
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(3)(4), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत इलािाबाि
22
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(3)(5), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत इलािाबाि
23
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(3)(6), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत इलािाबाि
24
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(4), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत लखनऊ
25
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(4)(1), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत लखनऊ
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1015
26
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(4)(2), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत बिराइर्
27
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(4)(3), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत लखनऊ
28
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक))-1(4)(4), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत लखनऊ
29
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(4)(5), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत लखनऊ
30
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(4)(6), फैिाबाि जस्ट्थत लखनऊ
31
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1, िल्द्वानी
32
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(1), नैनीताल
33
कायाचलय उप/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(1)(1), नैनीताल
34
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(1)(2), रूरपुर
35
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(1)(3), अल्मोड़ा
36
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(1)(4), िल्द्वानी
37
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(1)(5), िल्द्वानी
38
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(1)(6), िल्द्वानी
39
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(2), कािीपुर
40
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(2)(1), कािीपुर
41
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(2)(2), कािीपुर
42
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(2)(3), कािीपुर
43
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(2)(4), बरेली
44
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(2)(5), पीलीभीत
45
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(2)(6), रामपुर
46
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(3), बरेली
47
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(3)(1), बरेली
48
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(3)(2), बरेली
49
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(3)(3), बरेली
50
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(3)(4), बरेली
51
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(3)(5), बरेली
52
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(3)(6), बरेली
53
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(4), मुरािाबाि
54
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(4)(1), मुरािाबाि
55
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(4)(2), मुरािाबाि
56
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(4)(3), मुरािाबाि
57
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(4)(4), मुरािाबाि
1016
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
58
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(4)(5), मुरािाबाि
59
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(4)(6), निीबाबाि
60
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1, लखनऊ
61
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(1), लखनऊ
62
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(1)(1), लखनऊ
63
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(1)(2), लखनऊ
64
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(1)(3), लखनऊ
65
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(1)(4), लखनऊ
66
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(1)(5), लखनऊ
67
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(1)(6), लखनऊ
68
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(2), लखनऊ
69
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(2)(1), लखनऊ
70
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(2)(2), लखनऊ
71
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(2)(3), लखनऊ
72
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(2)(4), लखनऊ
73
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(2)(5), लखनऊ
74
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(2)(6), लखनऊ
75
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(3), लखनऊ
76
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(3)(1), लखनऊ
77
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(3)(2), लखनऊ
78
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(3)(3), लखनऊ
79
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(3)(4), लखनऊ
80
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(3)(5), लखनऊ
81
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(3)(6), लखनऊ
82
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(4), लखनऊ
83
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(4)(1), लखनऊ
84
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(4)(2), लखनऊ
85
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(4)(3), लखनऊ स्ट्टेिन रायबरेली
86
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(4)(4), लखनऊ स्ट्टेिन बाराबंकी
87
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(4)(5), लखनऊ स्ट्टेिन लखीमपुर खीरी
88
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (जनिाचरण एकक)-1(4)(6), लखनऊ स्ट्टेिन िरिोई
89
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त (सत्यापन एकक)-1, मुरािाबाि
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1017
90
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (सत्यापन एकक)-1(1), जबिनौर
91
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (सत्यापन एकक)-1(1)(1), निीबाबाि
92
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (सत्यापन एकक)-1(1)(2), जबिनौर
93
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (सत्यापन एकक)-1(1)(3), निीबाबाि
94
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (सत्यापन एकक)-1(1)(4), िािििांपुर
95
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (सत्यापन एकक)-1(1)(5), िेवररया
96
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (सत्यापन एकक)-1(1)(6), बिायूं
97
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (सत्यापन एकक)-1(2), आिमगढ़
98
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (सत्यापन एकक)-1(2)(1), मुरािाबाि जस्ट्थत लखनऊ
99
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (सत्यापन एकक)-1(2)(2), आिमगढ़
100
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (सत्यापन एकक)-1(2)(3), िौनपुर
101
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (सत्यापन एकक)-1(2)(4), बजलया
102
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (सत्यापन एकक)- 1(2)(5), बस्ट्ती
103
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (सत्यापन एकक)- 1(2)(6), इलािाबाि
104
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त सत्यापन एकक-1(3), जमिाचपुर
105
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (सत्यापन एकक)-1(3)(1), जमिाचपुर
106
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (सत्यापन एकक)-1(3)(2), जमिाचपुर
107
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (सत्यापन एकक)-1(3)(3), वाराणसी
108
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (सत्यापन एकक)-1(3)(4), वाराणसी
109
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (सत्यापन एकक)-1(3)(5), वाराणसी
110
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (सत्यापन एकक)-1(3)(6), भिोिी
111
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त (समीक्षा एकक)-1, वाराणसी
112
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (समीक्षा एकक)-1(1), वाराणसी
113
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (समीक्षा एकक)-1(1)(1), वाराणसी
114
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (समीक्षा एकक)-1(1)(2), वाराणसी
115
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (समीक्षा एकक)-1(1)(3), वाराणसी
116
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (समीक्षा एकक)-1(1)(4), वाराणसी
117
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (समीक्षा एकक)-1(1)(5), वाराणसी
118
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (समीक्षा एकक)-1(2), वाराणसी
119
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (समीक्षा एकक)-1(2)(2), वाराणसी जस्ट्थत आिमगढ़
120
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (समीक्षा एकक)-1(2)(3), वाराणसी
121
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (समीक्षा एकक)-1(2)(4), वाराणसी
1018
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
122
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (समीक्षा एकक)-1(2)(5), वाराणसी
123
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (समीक्षा एकक)-1(3), वाराणसी स्ट्टेिन इलािाबाि
124
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (समीक्षा एकक)-1(3)(1), वाराणसी स्ट्टेिन इलािाबाि
125
कायाचलय उप/सिायक आयकर आयुक्त (समीक्षा एकक)-1(3)(2), वाराणसी स्ट्टेिन इलािाबाि
126
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (समीक्षा एकक)-1(3)(3), वाराणसी स्ट्टेिन इलािाबाि
127
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (समीक्षा एकक)-1(3)(4), वाराणसी स्ट्टेिन इलािाबाि
128
कायाचलय आयकर अजिकारी (समीक्षा एकक)-1(3)(5), वाराणसी स्ट्टेिन इलािाबाि
129
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (अपील यूजनट)-1, बरेली
130
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (अपील यूजनट)-1, मुरािाबाि
131
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (अपील यूजनट)-1, िल्द्वानी
132
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (अपील यूजनट)-1, इलािाबाि
133
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (अपील यूजनट)-1, गोरखपुर
134
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (अपील यूजनट)-1, वाराणसी
135
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (अपील यूजनट)-1, लखनऊ
136
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (अपील यूजनट)-2, लखनऊ
[फाा. सं. ई-30018/1/2024- डीडी (ओएल) डीओआर]
जिजिर िमाच, संयुक्त जनिेिक (रािभाषा)
New Delhi, the 10th March, 2025
S.O. 362.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of
the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies, the following offices under Department of Revenue
where more than 80% staff has acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:
PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW
1
O/o The Pr. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Lucknow
2
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Lucknow
3
O/o The Addl./Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-1, Lucknow
4
O/o The Addl./Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-3, Lucknow
5
O/o The Deputy/Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Lucknow
6
O/o The Deputy/Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-3, Lucknow
7
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward- 1(1), Lucknow
8
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward- 1(4) Lucknow
9
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward- 2(1) Lucknow
10
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward- 2(4), Unnao
11
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward- 4(1), Lucknow
12
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward- 4(3), Lucknow
13
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-3(1), Lucknow
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1019
14
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward- 3(5) Lucknow
15
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward- 5(1) Lucknow
16
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward- 5(4), Barabanki
17
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward- 6(1), Lucknow
18
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward- 6(2), Lucknow
19
O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax (T.D.S.), Lucknow
20
O/o The Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax (T.D.S.), Lucknow
21
O/o The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (T.D.S.), Lucknow
22
O/o The Income Tax Officer (T.D.S.), Lucknow
23
O/o The Income Tax Officer (T.D.S.), Faizabad
24
O/o The Income Tax Officer (T.D.S.), Sultanpur
25
O/o The Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax (T.D.S.), Prayagraj
26
O/o The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (T.D.S.), Prayagraj
27
O/o The Income Tax Officer (T.D.S.), Prayagraj
28
O/o The Income Tax Officer (T.D.S.)-1, Varanasi
29
O/o The Income Tax Officer (T.D.S.)-2, Varanasi
30
O/o The Income Tax Officer (T.D.S.), Gorakhpur
31
O/o The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (T.D.S.) Bareilly
32
O/o The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax (T.D.S.), Bareilly
33
O/o The Income Tax Officer (T.D.S.), Bareilly
34
O/o The Income Tax Officer (T.D.S.), Moradabad
35
O/o The Income Tax Officer (T.D.S.), Sitapur
36
O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Lucknow
37
O/o The Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Lucknow
38
O/o The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Lucknow
39
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Exemptions), Lucknow
40
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Exemptions), Allahabad
41
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Exemptions), Bareilly
42
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Exemptions), Varanasi
43
O/o The Director Of Income Tax (I. & C.I.), Lucknow
44
O/o The Joint Director Of Income Tax (I. & C.I.), Lucknow
45
O/o The Asst. Director Of Income Tax (I. & C.I.), Lucknow
46
O/o The Director Of Income Tax (I. & C.I.), Lucknow
47
O/o The Income Tax Officer (I. & C.I.), Gorakhpur
48
O/o The Income Tax Officer (I. & C.I.), Moradabad
49
O/o The Income Tax Officer (I. & C.I.), Bareilly
50
O/o The Income Tax Officer (I. & C.I.), Varanasi
51
O/o The Income Tax Officer (I. & C.I.), Prayagraj
52
O/o The Asst. Director Of Income Tax (I. & C.I.), Prayagraj(Addl.Charge)
53
O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax (I.T.A.T) -1 & 2
1020
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ALLAHABAD
1
O/o The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax Allahabad
2
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Allahabad
3
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-I. Allahabad
4
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1 Allahabad
5
O/o The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1) Allahabad
6
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-1(3) Allahabad
7
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-2(1) Allahabad
8
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward 2(4) Fatehpur
9
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward 2(5) Kaushambi
10
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-I. Varanasi
11
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1 Varanasi
12
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-1(1) Varanasi
13
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-2(1) Varanasi
14
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward 3(1) Varanasi
15
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-1(5) Bhadohi
16
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-2(4) Ballia
17
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-3(5) Ghazipur
18
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-3(2) Mirzapur
19
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward 3(3) Sonbhadra
20
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Gorakhpur
21
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-I. Gorakhpur
22
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1 Gorakhpur
23
O/o The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1) Gorakhpur
24
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-2(1) Gorakhpur
25
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-1(4) Maharajganj
26
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward 2(4) Kushinagar
27
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward 3(1) Azamgarh
28
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-3(3) Mau
29
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-3(4) Deoria
30
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-I. Faizabad
31
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1 Faizabad
32
O/o The Income Tax Officer-1, Faizabad
33
O/o The Income Tax Officer, Ambedkar Nagar
34
O/o The Income Tax Officer, Jaunpur
35
O/o The Income Tax Officer, Sultanpur
36
O/o The Income Tax Officer, Amethi
37
O/o The Income Tax Officer, Rae Bareli
38
O/o The Income Tax Officer, Pratapgarh
39
O/o The Income Tax Officer, Gonda
40
O/o The Income Tax Officer, Basti
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1021
41
O/o The Income Tax Officer, Bahraich
42
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Bareilly
43
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-I. Bareilly
44
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1 Bareilly
45
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-1(1) Bareilly
46
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-1(4) Shahjahanpur
47
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-2(2) Bareilly
48
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-2(4) Pilibhit
49
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-3 Sitapur
50
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-3 Sitapur
51
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-3(1) Sitapur
52
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-(2) Hardoi
53
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward 3(4) Lakhimpur Khiri
54
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-1 Moradabad
55
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1 Moradabad
56
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward - 1(1) Moradabad
57
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-1(3) Rampur
58
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-1(5) Sambhal
59
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-2(1) Moradabad
60
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-2(3) Budaun
61
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-2(5) Chandausi
62
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-3(1) Najibabad
63
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-3(3) Bijnor
64
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-1 Haldwani
65
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1 Haldwani
66
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-2(1) Haldwani
67
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-1(4) Rudrapur
68
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-2(1) Kashipur
69
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-2(4) Bajpur
70
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-2(5) Ramnagar
71
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-3(1) Nainital
72
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-3(2) Almora
73
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward-3(4) Pithoragarh
74
O/o The Income Tax Officer Ward 3(5) Khatima
75
O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals Unit-1) Allahabad
76
O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals Unit-1) Varanasi
77
O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals Unit-1) Gorakhpur
78
O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals Unit-1) Bareilly
79
O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals Unit-1) Moradabad
80
O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals Unit-1) Haldwani
1022
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (REAC), BAREILLY
1
O/o The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC) Bareilly
2
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1, Faizabad
3
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1(1), Faizabad
4
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1(1)(1), Faizabad
5
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(1)(2), Faizabad
6
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(1)(3), Faizabad
7
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(1)(4), Faizabad
8
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(1)(5), Faizabad
9
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(1)(6), Faizabad
10
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1(2), Faizabad
11
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1(2)(1), Faizabad
12
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(2)(2), Faizabad
13
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(2)(3), Faizabad
14
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(2)(4), Faizabad
15
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(2)(5), Faizabad
16
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(2)(6), Faizabad
17
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1(3), Faizabad
18
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1(3)(1), Faizabad
19
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(3)(2), Faizabad
20
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(3)(3), Faizabad
21
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(3)(4), Faizabad
22
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(3)(5), Faizabad
23
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(3)(6), Faizabad
24
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1(4), Faizabad
25
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1(4)(1), Faizabad
26
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(4)(2), Faizabad
27
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(4)(3), Faizabad
28
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(4)(4), Faizabad
29
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(4)(5), Faizabad
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (REAC)(AU)-1, HALDWANI
1
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1, Haldwani
2
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1(1), Haldwani
3
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1(1)(1), Haldwani
4
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(1)(2), Haldwani
5
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(1)(3), Haldwani
6
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(1)(4), Haldwani
7
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(1)(5), Haldwani
8
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(1)(6), Haldwani
9
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1(2), Haldwani
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1023
10
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1(2)(1), Haldwani
11
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(2)(2), Haldwani
12
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(2)(3), Haldwani
13
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(2)(4), Haldwani
14
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(2)(5), Haldwani
15
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(2)(6), Haldwani
16
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1(3), Haldwani
17
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1(3)(1), Haldwani
18
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(3)(2), Haldwani
19
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(3)(3), Haldwani
20
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(3)(4), Haldwani
21
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(3)(5), Haldwani
22
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(3)(6), Haldwani
23
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1(4), Haldwani
24
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1(4)(1), Haldwani
25
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(4)(2), Haldwani
26
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(4)(3), Haldwani
27
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(4)(4), Haldwani
28
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(4)(5), Haldwani
29
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(4)(6), Haldwani
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (REAC)(AU)-1, LUCKNOW
1
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1, Lucknow
2
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1(1), Lucknow
3
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1(1)(1), Lucknow
4
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(1)(2), Lucknow
5
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(1)(3), Lucknow
6
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(1)(4), Lucknow
7
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(1)(5), Lucknow
8
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(1)(6), Lucknow
9
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1(2), Lucknow
10
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1(2)(1), Lucknow
11
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(2)(2), Lucknow
12
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(2)(3), Lucknow
13
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(2)(4), Lucknow
14
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(2)(5), Lucknow
15
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(2)(6), Lucknow
16
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1(3), Lucknow
17
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1(3)(1), Lucknow
18
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(3)(2), Lucknow
19
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(3)(3), Lucknow
1024
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
20
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(3)(4), Lucknow
21
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(3)(5), Lucknow
22
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(3)(6), Lucknow
23
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1(4), Lucknow
24
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(AU)-1(4)(1), Lucknow
25
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(4)(2), Lucknow
26
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(4)(3), Lucknow
27
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(4)(4), Lucknow
28
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(4)(5), Lucknow
29
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(AU)-1(4)(6), Lucknow
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (REAC)(VU)-1, MORADABAD
1
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(VU)-1, Moradabad
2
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(VU)-1(1), Moradabad
3
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(VU)-1(1)(1), Moradabad
4
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(VU)-1(1)(2), Moradabad
5
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(VU)-1(1)(3), Moradabad
6
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(VU)-1(1)(4), Moradabad
7
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(VU)-1(1)(5), Moradabad
8
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(VU)-1(1)(6), Moradabad
9
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(VU)-1(2), Moradabad
10
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(VU)-1(2)(1), Moradabad
11
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(VU)-1(2)(2), Moradabad
12
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(VU)-1(2)(3), Moradabad
13
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(VU)-1(2)(4), Moradabad
14
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(VU)-1(2)(5), Moradabad
15
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(VU)-1(2)(6), Moradabad
16
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(VU)-1(3), Moradabad
17
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(VU)-1(3)(1), Moradabad
18
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(VU)-1(3)(2), Moradabad
19
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(VU)-1(3)(3), Moradabad
20
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(VU)-1(3)(4), Moradabad
21
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(VU)-1(3)(5), Moradabad
22
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(VU)-1(3)(6), Moradabad
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (REAC)(RU)-1, VARANASI
1
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(RU)-1, Varanasi
2
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(RU)-1(1), Varanasi
3
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(RU)-1(1)(1), Varanasi
4
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(RU)-1(1)(2), Varanasi
5
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(RU)-1(1)(3), Varanasi
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1025
6
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(RU)-1(1)(4), Varanasi
7
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(RU)-1(1)(5), Varanasi
8
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(RU)-1(1)(6), Varanasi
9
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(RU)-1(2), Varanasi
10
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(RU)-1(2)(1), Varanasi
11
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(RU)-1(2)(2), Varanasi
12
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(RU)-1(2)(3), Varanasi
13
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(RU)-1(2)(4), Varanasi
14
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(RU)-1(2)(5), Varanasi
15
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(RU)-1(2)(6), Varanasi
16
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (REAC)(RU)-1(3), Varanasi
17
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner(REAC)(RU)-1(3)(1), Varanasi
18
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(RU)-1(3)(2), Varanasi
19
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(RU)-1(3)(3), Varanasi
20
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(RU)-1(3)(4), Varanasi
21
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(RU)-1(3)(5), Varanasi
22
O/o The Income Tax Officer (REAC)(RU)-1(3)(6), Varanasi
CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BAREILLY
1
O/o The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Bareilly
2
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1, Faizabad
3
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1(1), Faizabad Stationed at
Gonda.
4
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1(1)(1), Faizabad Stationed at
Gonda
5
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(1)(2), Faizabad Stationed at Faizabad.
6
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(1)(3), Faizabad Stationed at Faizabad.
7
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(1)(4), Faizabad Stationed at Faizabad.
8
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(1)(5), Faizabad Stationed at Gorakhpur
9
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(1)(6), Faizabad Stationed at Gorakhpur
10
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1(2), Faizabad Stationed at
Gorakhpur
11
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1(2)(1), Faizabad Stationed at
Gorakhpur
12
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(2)(2), Faizabad Stationed at Gorakhpur
13
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(2)(3), Faizabad Stationed at Gorakhpur
14
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(2)(4), Faizabad Stationed at Gorakhpur
15
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(2)(5), Faizabad Stationed at Gorakhpur
16
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(2)(6), Faizabad Stationed at Gorakhpur
17
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1(3), Faizabad Stationed at
Sultanpur
18
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1(3)(1), Faizabad Stationed at
Sultanpur
1026
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
19
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(3)(2), Faizabad Stationed at Sonbhadra
20
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(3)(3), Faizabad Stationed at Sonbhadra
21
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(3)(4), Faizabad Stationed at Allahabad
22
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(3)(5), Faizabad Stationed at Allahabad
23
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(3)(6), Faizabad Stationed at Allahabad
24
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1(4), Faizabad Stationed at
Lucknow
25
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1(4)(1), Faizabad Stationed at
Lucknow
26
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(4)(2), Faizabad Stationed at Bahraich
27
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(4)(3), Faizabad Stationed at Lucknow
28
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(4)(4), Faizabad Stationed at Lucknow
29
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(4)(5), Faizabad Stationed at Lucknow
30
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(4)(6), Faizabad Stationed at Lucknow
31
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1, Haldwani
32
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1(1), Nainital
33
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1(1)(1), Nainital
34
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(1)(2), Rudrapur
35
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(1)(3), Almora
36
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(1)(4), Haldwani
37
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(1)(5), Haldwani
38
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(1)(6), Haldwani
39
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1(2), Kashipur
40
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1(2)(1), Kashipur
41
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(2)(2), Kashipur
42
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(2)(3), Kashipur
43
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(2)(4), Bareilly
44
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(2)(5), Pilibhit
45
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(2)(6), Rampur
46
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1(3), Bareilly
47
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1(3)(1), Bareilly
48
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(3)(2), Bareilly
49
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(3)(3), Bareilly
50
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(3)(4), Bareilly
51
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(3)(5), Bareilly
52
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(3)(6), Bareilly
53
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1(4), Moradabad
54
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1(4)(1), Moradabad
55
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(4)(2), Moradabad
56
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(4)(3), Moradabad
57
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(4)(4), Moradabad
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1027
58
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(4)(5), Moradabad
59
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(4)(6), Najibabad
60
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1, Lucknow
61
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1(1), Lucknow
62
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1(1)(1), Lucknow
63
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(1)(2), Lucknow
64
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(1)(3), Lucknow
65
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(1)(4), Lucknow
66
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(1)(5), Lucknow
67
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(1)(6), Lucknow
68
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1(2), Lucknow
69
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1(2)(1), Lucknow
70
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(2)(2), Lucknow
71
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(2)(3), Lucknow
72
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(2)(4), Lucknow
73
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(2)(5), Lucknow
74
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(2)(6), Lucknow
75
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1(3), Lucknow
76
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1(3)(1), Lucknow
77
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(3)(2), Lucknow
78
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(3)(3), Lucknow
79
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(3)(4), Lucknow
80
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(3)(5), Lucknow
81
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(3)(6), Lucknow
82
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1(4), Lucknow
83
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-1(4)(1), Lucknow
84
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(4)(2), Lucknow
85
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(4)(3), Lucknow Stationed at Raibareilly
86
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(4)(4), Lucknow Stationed at Barabanki
87
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(4)(5), Lucknow Stationed at Lakhimpur Kheri
88
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Assessment Unit)-1(4)(6), Lucknow Stationed at Hardoi
89
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Verification Unit)-1, Moradabad
90
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Verification Unit)-1(1), Bijnore
91
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Verification Unit)-1(1)(1), Najibabad
92
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Verification Unit)-1(1)(2), Bijnore
93
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Verification Unit)-1(1)(3), Najibabad
94
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Verification Unit)-1(1)(4), Shahjahanpur
95
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Verification Unit)-1(1)(5), Deoria
96
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Verification Unit)-1(1)(6), Badaun.
97
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Verification Unit)-1(2), Azamgarh
1028
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
98
O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Verification Unit)-1(2)(1), Moradabad Stationed
at Lucknow
99
O/o The Income Tax Officer (Verification Unit)-1(2)(2), Azamgarh
100 O/o The Income Tax Officer (Verification Unit)-1(2)(3), Jaunpur
101 O/o The Income Tax Officer (Verification Unit)-1(2)(4), Balia
102 O/o The Income Tax Officer (Verification Unit)-1(2)(5), Basti
103 O/o The Income Tax Officer (Verification Unit)-1(2)(6), Allahabad
104 O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Verification Unit)-1(3), Mirzapur
105 O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Verification Unit)-1(3)(1), Mirzapur
106 O/o The Income Tax Officer (Verification Unit)-1(3)(2), Mirzapur
107 O/o The Income Tax Officer (Verification Unit)-1(3)(3), Varanasi
108 O/o The Income Tax Officer (Verification Unit)-1(3)(4), Varanasi
109 O/o The Income Tax Officer (Verification Unit)-1(3)(5), Varanasi
110 O/o The Income Tax Officer (Verification Unit)-1(3)(6), Bhadohi
111 O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Review Unit)-1, Varanasi
112 O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Review Unit)-1(1), Varanasi
113 O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Review Unit)-1(1)(1),Varanasi
114 O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Officer (Review Unit)-1(1)(2), Varanasi
115 O/o The Income Tax Officer (Review Unit)-1(1)(3), Varanasi
116 O/o The Income Tax Officer (Review Unit)-1(1)(4), Varanasi
117 O/o The Income Tax Officer (Review Unit)-1(1)(5), Varanasi
118 O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Review Unit)-1(2), Varanasi
119 O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Review Unit)-1(2)(2),Varanasi stationed at
Azamgarh
120 O/o The Income Tax Officer (Review Unit)-1(2)(3), Varanasi
121 O/o The Income Tax Officer (Review Unit)-1(2)(4), Varanasi
122 O/o The Income Tax Officer (Review Unit)-1(2)(5), Varanasi
123 O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Review Unit)-1(3), Varanasi Stationed at
Allhabad
124 O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Review Unit)-1(3)(1),Varanasi Stationed at
Allahabad
125 O/o The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Review Unit)-1(3)(2), Varanasi Stationed at
Allahabad
126 O/o The Income Tax Officer (Review Unit)-1(3)(3), Varanasi Stationed at Allahabad
127 O/o The Income Tax Officer (Review Unit)-1(3)(4), Varanasi Stationed at Allahabad
128 O/o The Income Tax Officer (Review Unit)-1(3)(5), Varanasi Stationed at Allahabad
129 O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal Unit)-1, Bareilly
130 O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal Unit)-1, Moradabad
131 O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal Unit)-1, Haldwani
132 O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal Unit)-1, Allahabad
133 O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal Unit)-1, Gorakhpur
134 O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal Unit)-1, Varanasi
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1029
135 O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal Unit)-1, Lucknow
136 O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal Unit)-2, Lucknow
[F. No E-30018/1/2024-D.D(O.L) DOR]
SHISHIR SHARMA, Jt. Director (OL)
नई दिल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 363.—केन्र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम, 1976 के जनयम 10
के उपजनयम (4) के अनुसरण में रािस्ट्व जवभाग के अिीन, जनम्नजलजखत कायाचलयों, जिनके 80 प्रजतित से अजिक
कमचर्ाररयों ने जिन्िी का कायच सािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जलया िै, को अजिसूजर्त करती िै:
प्रिान मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त, मुंबई
1
कायाचलय प्रिान मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त, मुंबई
2
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त-(न्याजयक), मुंबई
3
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त-(न्याजयक), मुंबई
4
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त(लेखा परीक्षा)-1, मुंबई
5
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त(लेखा परीक्षा)-1, मुंबई
6
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त(लेखा परीक्षा)-2, मुंबई
7
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त(लेखा परीक्षा)-2, मुंबई
8
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त(छूट), मुंबई
9
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त(आसूर्ना एवं आपराजिक िांर्), मुंबई
कायाचलय - मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त -1, मुंबई
1
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त -1, मुंबई
2
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त-1, मुंबई
3
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-1(1), मुंबई
4
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-1(2), मुंबई
5
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-1(3), मुंबई
6
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त-2, मुंबई
7
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-2(1), मुंबई
8
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-2(2), मुंबई
9
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-2(3), मुंबई
1030
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कायाचलय- मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त -2, मुंबई
1
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त -2, मुंबई
2
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त-3, मुंबई
3
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-3(1), मुंबई
4
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-3(2), मुंबई
5
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-3(3), मुंबई
6
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-3(4), मुंबई
7
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त-4, मुंबई
8
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-4(1), मुंबई
9
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-4(2), मुंबई
10
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-4(3), मुंबई
11
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (सिस्ट्य) (सक्षम प्राजिकारी), मुंबई
कायाचलय- मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त -3, मुंबई
1
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त-3, मुंबई
2
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त-6, मुंबई
3
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-6(1), मुंबई
4
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त,रेंि-14(1), मुंबई
5
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त,रेंि-15(1), मुंबई
6
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त-27, मुंबई
7
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-27(1), मुंबई
8
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-27(2), मुंबई
9
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-27(3), मुंबई
कायाचलय- मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त -4, मुंबई
1
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त-4, मुंबई
2
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त-5, मुंबई
3
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-5(1), मुंबई
4
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-5(2), मुंबई
5
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त रेंि-5(3), मुंबई
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1031
6
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त-8, मुंबई
7
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-8(1), मुंबई
8
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-8(2), मुंबई
9
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-8(3), मुंबई
10
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-7(1), मुंबई
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त - 5, मुंबई
1
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त - 5 , मुंबई
2
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त - 19, मुंबई
3
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि -19(1), मुंबई
4
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि -19(3), मुंबई
5
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त-20, मुंबई
6
कायाचलय संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त रेंि-20(1), मुंबई
7
कायाचलय संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त रेंि-22(1), मुंबई
8
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि -23(1), मुंबई
9
कायाचलय संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त रेंि-24(1), मुंबई
10
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (जवभागीय प्रजतजनजि) प्रिासन, मुंबई
कायाचलय-मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त 6, मुंबई
1
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त - 6, मुंबई
2
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त - 17, मुंबई
3
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-17(1), मुंबई
4
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-26(1), मुंबई
5
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-32(1), मुंबई
6
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त - 41, मुंबई
7
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-41(1), मुंबई
8
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-41(2), मुंबई
9
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-41(3), मुंबई
10
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-41(4), मुंबई
11
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त - 42, मुंबई
12
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-42(1), मुंबई
13
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-42(2), मुंबई
14
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त, रेंि-42(3), मुंबई
कायाचलय-मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त -7, मुंबई
1
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त -7, मुंबई
2
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई)-5, मुंबई
1032
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई)-5(1), मुंबई
4
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई)-5(2), मुंबई
5
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई)-5(3), मुंबई
6
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई)-5(4), मुंबई
7
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई) -6, मुंबई
8
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई) -6(1), मुंबई
9
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई) -6 (2), मुंबई
10
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई) -6(3), मुंबई
11
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई) -6 (4), मुंबई
12
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त, (जनिाचरण इकाई)-7, मुंबई
13
कायाचलय संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त, (जनिाचरण इकाई) -7(1), मुंबई
14
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई) -7(2), मुंबई
15
कायाचलय संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त, (जनिाचरण इकाई)) -7(3), मुंबई
16
कायाचलय संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त, (जनिाचरण इकाई)) -7(4), मुंबई
17
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त (समीक्षा इकाई)-2, मुंबई
18
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (समीक्षा इकाई)-2(1), मुंबई
19
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (समीक्षा इकाई)-2(2), मुंबई
20
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (समीक्षा इकाई)-2(3), मुंबई
कायाचलय-मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त -8, मुंबई
1
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त-8, मुंबई
2
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई)-9, मुंबई
3
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई) -9(1), मुंबई
4
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई) -9 (2), मुंबई
5
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई) -9(3), मुंबई
6
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई) -9(4), मुंबई
7
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई)-10, मुंबई
8
कायाचलय अजतररक्त/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई)-10(1), मुंबई
9
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई) -10 (2), मुंबई
10
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई) -10(3), मुंबई
11
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई) -10 (4), मुंबई
12
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई)-11, मुंबई
13
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई)-11(1), मुंबई
14
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई) -11(2), मुंबई
15
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई) -11(3), मुंबई
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1033
16
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई) -11(4), मुंबई
17
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई)-12, मुंबई
18
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई) -12(1), मुंबई
19
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई) -12(2), मुंबई
20
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई)-12(3), मुंबई
21
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई)-12(4), मुंबई
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त -9, मुंबई
1
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त-9, मुंबई
2
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई)-13,मुंबई
3
कायाचलय अपर/ संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई)-13(1), मुंबई
4
कायाचलय संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई)-13(2), मुंबई
5
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई)-13(3), मुंबई
6
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई)-13(4), मुंबई
7
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई)-14, मुंबई
8
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई)-14(1),मुंबई
9
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई)-14(2),मुंबई
10
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई)-14(3),मुंबई
11
कायाचलय संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई)-14(4), मुंबई
12
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई)-15, मुंबई
13
कायाचलय संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई)-15(1), मुंबई
14
कायाचलय संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई)-15(2), मुंबई
15
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई)-15(3),मुंबई
16
कायाचलय संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई)-15(4), मुंबई
17
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई)-16, मुंबई
18
कायाचलय अपर/ संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई)16(1), मुंबई
19
कायाचलय अपर/ संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई)-16(2), मुंबई
20
कायाचलय अपर/ संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई)-16(3), मुंबई
21
कायाचलय अपर/ संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई)-16(4), मुंबई
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त -10, मुंबई
1
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त-10, मुंबई
2
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त(सत्यापन इकाई)-1, मुंबई
3
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त(सत्यापन इकाई)-1(1), मुंबई
4
कायाचलय अपर/ संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त(सत्यापन इकाई)-1(2), मुंबई
5
कायाचलय अपर/ संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त(सत्यापन इकाई)-1(3), मुंबई
1034
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
6
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त(सत्यापन इकाई)-2, मुंबई
7
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त(सत्यापन इकाई)-2(1), मुंबई
8
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त(सत्यापन इकाई)-2(2), मुंबई
9
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त(सत्यापन इकाई)-2(3), मुंबई
10
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त(सत्यापन इकाई)-3, मुंबई
11
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त(सत्यापन इकाई)-3(1), मुंबई
12
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त(सत्यापन इकाई)-3(2), मुंबई
13
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त(सत्यापन इकाई)-3(3), मुंबई
14
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त(तकनीकी इकाई)-1, मुंबई
15
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त(तकनीकी इकाई)-1(1), मुंबई
16
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त(तकनीकी इकाई)-1(2), मुंबई
17
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त(तकनीकी इकाई)-1(3), मुंबई
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त-11, मुंबई
1
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त-11, मुंबई
2
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त(समीक्षा इकाई) -1, मुंबई
3
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त(समीक्षा इकाई) -1(1), मुंबई
4
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त(समीक्षा इकाई)-1(2), मुंबई
5
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त(समीक्षा इकाई)-1(3), मुंबई
6
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई)-1, मुंबई
7
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई)-1(1), मुंबई
8
कायाचलय संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई)-1(2), मुंबई
9
कायाचलय संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई)-1(3), मुंबई
10
कायाचलय संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई)-1(4), मुंबई
11
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई)-2, मुंबई
12
कायाचलय संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई) -2(1), मुंबई
13
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई) -2 (2), मुंबई
14
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई) -2 (3), मुंबई
15
कायाचलय संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई) -2(4), मुंबई
16
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई)-3, मुंबई
17
कायाचलय संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई)-3(1), मुंबई
18
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई)-3(2), मुंबई
19
कायाचलय संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई)-3(3), मुंबई
20
कायाचलय संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई))-3(4), मुंबई
21
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई) 4, मुंबई
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1035
22
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त-(जनिाचरण इकाई) -4(1), मुंबई
23
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई) - 4(2), मुंबई
24
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त(जनिाचरण इकाई) - 4(3), मुंबई
25
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (जनिाचरण इकाई) - 4(4), मुंबई
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त (केंरीय)-1, मुंबई
1
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त (केंरीय)-।, मुंबई
2
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त(केंरीय)-।, मुंबई
3
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (केंरीय) रेंि-।, मुंबई
4
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (केंरीय) रेंि-2, मुंबई
5
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त (केंरीय)-4, मुंबई
6
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (केंरीय) रेंि-7, मुंबई
7
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त(केंरीय)) रेंि-8, मुंबई
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त (केंरीय)-2, मुंबई
1
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त (केंरीय))-2, मुंबई
2
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त (केंरीय)-2, मुंबई
3
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (केंरीय) रेंि-3, मुंबई
4
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (केंरीय) रेंि-4, मुंबई
5
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर आयुक्त (केंरीय)-3, मुंबई
6
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त(केंरीय) रेंि-5, मुंबई
7
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (केंरीय), रेंि-6, मुंबई
कायाचलय आयकर मिाजनिेिक (अन्वेषण), मुंबई
1
कायाचलय आयकर मिाजनिेिक (अन्वेषण), मुंबई
2
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर जनिेिक (अन्वेषण) -1, मुंबई
3
कायाचलय अपर आयकर जनिेिक (अन्वेषण), इकाई-1, मुंबई
4
कायाचलय अपर आयकर जनिेिक (अन्वेषण), इकाई-2, मुंबई
5
कायाचलय अपर आयकर जनिेिक (अन्वेषण), इकाई-3, मुंबई
6
कायाचलय अपर आयकर जनिेिक (अन्वेषण), इकाई-4, मुंबई
7
कायाचलय अपर आयकर जनिेिक (अन्वे.) (जविेिी संपजत्त अन्वेषण इकाई) -1, मुंबई
8
कायाचलय अपर आयकर जनिेिक (अन्वे.) (जविेिी संपजत्त अन्वेषण इकाई) -2, मुंबई
9
कायाचलय प्रिान आयकर जनिेिक(अन्वेषण.)-2, मुंबई
10
कायाचलय अपर आयकर जनिेिक (अन्वेषण), इकाई-5, मुंबई
11
कायाचलय अपर आयकर जनिेिक (अन्वेषण), इकाई-6, मुंबई
12
कायाचलय अपर आयकर जनिेिक (अन्वे.) (जविेिी संपजत्त अन्वेषण इकाई) -3, मुंबई
13
कायाचलय अपर आयकर जनिेिक (अन्वेषण), इकाई-7, मुंबई
1036
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
14
कायाचलय अपर आयकर जनिेिक (अन्वेषण), इकाई-8, मुंबई
15
कायाचलय अपर आयकर जनिेिक (अन्वे.) (जविेिी संपजत्त अन्वेषण इकाई) -4, मुंबई
16
कायाचलय संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (बेनामी जनषेि इकाई)-1, मुंबई
17
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (बेनामी जनषेि इकाई)-2, मुंबई
कायाचलय-मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त (अंतराचष्ट्रीय करािान) (पजिम अंर्ल), मुंबई
1
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त (अंतराचष्ट्रीय करािान तथा मूल्यांतरण) पजिम अंर्ल, मुंबई
2
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (अंतराचष्ट्रीय करािान) -1, मुंबई
3
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (अंतराचष्ट्रीय करािान) -1(1), मुंबई
4
कायाचलय अपर/संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (अंतराचष्ट्रीय करािान)-1(2), मुंबई
5
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (अंतराचष्ट्रीय करािान)- 1(3), मुंबई
6
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (अंतराचष्ट्रीय करािान) -2, मुंबई
7
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (अंतराचष्ट्रीय करािान) -2(1), मुंबई
8
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (अंतराचष्ट्रीय करािान) -2 (2), मुंबई
9
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (अंतराचष्ट्रीय करािान) -2 (3), मुंबई
10
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (अंतराचष्ट्रीय करािान) -3, मुंबई
11
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (अंतराचष्ट्रीय करािान) रेंि -3(1), मुंबई
12
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (अंतराचष्ट्रीय करािान) रेंि - 3(2), मुंबई
13
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (अंतराचष्ट्रीय करािान)रेंि- 3 (3), मुंबई
14
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (अंतराचष्ट्रीय करािान) -4, मुंबई
15
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (अंतराचष्ट्रीय करािान) रेंि 4(1), मुंबई
16
कायाचलय संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (अंतराचष्ट्रीय करािान) रेंि 4(2), मुंबई
17
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (अंतराचष्ट्रीय करािान) रेंि 4(3), मुंबई
18
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (मूल्यांतरण) -1, मुंबई
19
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (मूल्यांतरण) रेंि 1(1), मुंबई
20
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (मूल्यांतरण) रेंि 1(2), मुंबई
21
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (मूल्यांतरण) रेंि 1(3), मुंबई
22
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (मूल्यांतरण) -2, मुंबई
23
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (मूल्यांतरण) रेंि 2(1), मुंबई
24
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (मूल्यांतरण) रेंि 2(2), मुंबई
25
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (मूल्यांतरण) रेंि 2(3), मुंबई
26
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (मूल्यांतरण) -3, मुंबई
27
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (मूल्यांतरण) रेंि 3(1), मुंबई
28
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (मूल्यांतरण) रेंि 3(2), मुंबई
29
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (मूल्यांतरण) रेंि 3(3), मुंबई
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1037
[फाा. सं. ई-30018/1/2024- डीडी (ओएल) डीओआर]
जिजिर िमाच, संयुक्त जनिेिक (रािभाषा)
New Delhi, the 11th March, 2025
S.O. 363.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of
the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies, the following offices under Department of Revenue
where more than 80% staff has acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:
PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI
1
O/o The Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai
2
O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax-(Judicial), Mumbai
3
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax -(Judicial), Mumbai
4
O/o The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Audit)-1,Mumbai.
5
O/o The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax(Audit)-1, Mumbai.
6
O/o The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Audit)-2,Mumbai.
7
O/o The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax(Audit)-2,Mumbai.
8
O/o The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Exemption),Mumbai.
9
O/o The Commissioner Of Income Tax(I & CI) ,Mumbai.
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Mumbai
1
O/o The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax,-1 Mumbai.
2
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Mumbai.
3
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range -1(1), Mumbai.
4
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-1(2), Mumbai.
30
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (मूल्यांतरण) -4, मुंबई
31
कायाचलय संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त (मूल्यांतरण) रेंि 4(1), मुंबई
32
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (मूल्यांतरण), रेंि 4(2), मुंबई
33
कायाचलय अपर आयकर आयुक्त (मूल्यांतरण), रेंि 4(3), मुंबई
34
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (जववाि जनराकरण पैनल)-1, मुंबई-1
35
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (जववाि जनराकरण पैनल)-1, मुंबई-2
36
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त (जववाि जनराकरण पैनल) -1, मुंबई -3
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त-टीडीएस, मुंबई
1
कायाचलय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त-(स्रोत पर कर कटौती),मुंबई
2
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त-(स्रोत पर कर कटौती)-1, मुंबई
3
कायाचलय अपर/ संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त-( स्रोत पर कर कटौती)-1(1), मुंबई
4
कायाचलय अपर/ संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त-( स्रोत पर कर कटौती)-1(2), मुंबई
5
कायाचलय अपर/ संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त-( स्रोत पर कर कटौती)-1(3), मुंबई
6
कायाचलय आयकर आयुक्त-( स्रोत पर कर कटौती)-2, मुंबई
7
कायाचलय अपर/ संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त-( स्रोत पर कर कटौती)-2(1), मुंबई
8
कायाचलय अपर/ संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त-( स्रोत पर कर कटौती)-2(2), मुंबई
9
कायाचलय अपर/ संयुक्त आयकर आयुक्त-( स्रोत पर कर कटौती)-2(3), मुंबई
1038
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
5
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-1(3), Mumbai.
6
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Mumbai.
7
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax Range-2(1), Mumbai.
8
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-2(2), Mumbai.
9
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-2(3), Mumbai.
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Mumbai
1
O/o The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Mumbai
2
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -3, Mumbai
3
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-3(1), Mumbai
4
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-3(2), Mumbai
5
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range -3(3), Mumbai
6
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range -3(4), Mumbai
7
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Mumbai
8
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range -4(1), Mumbai
9
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range -4(2), Mumbai
10
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range -4(3), Mumbai
11
O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax -(Member) (Appropriate Authority), Mumbai
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Mumbai
1
O/o The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai
2
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -6, Mumbai
3
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-6(1), Mumbai
4
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax-Range-14(1), Mumbai
5
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax-Range-15(1), Mumbai
6
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -27, Mumbai
7
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-27(1), Mumbai
8
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-27(2), Mumbai
9
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-27(3), Mumbai
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-4 Mumbai
1
O/o The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Mumbai
2
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-5, Mumbai
3
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-5(1), Mumbai
4
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-5(2), Mumbai
5
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-5(3), Mumbai
6
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-8, Mumbai
7
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-8(1), Mumbai
8
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-8(2), Mumbai
9
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-8(3), Mumbai
10
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-7(1), Mumbai
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-5, Mumbai
1
O/o The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-5,Mumbai
2
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-19, Mumbai
3
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-19(1),Mumbai
4
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-19(3),Mumbai
5
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -20, Mumbai
6
O/o The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-20(1), Mumbai
7
O/o The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-22(1), Mumbai
8
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-23(1),Mumbai
9
O/o The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-24(1), Mumbai
10
O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax(Departmental Representative) Admin, Mumbai
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1039
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-6 Mumbai
1
O/o The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-6,Mumbai
2
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-17,Mumbai
3
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-17(1),Mumbai
4
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-26(1), Mumbai
5
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-32(1), Mumbai
6
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-41,Mumbai
7
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-41(1),Mumbai
8
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-41(2),Mumbai
9
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-41(3),Mumbai
10
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-41(4),Mumbai
11
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-42,Mumbai
12
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-42(1),Mumbai
13
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-42(2),Mumbai
14
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-42(3),Mumbai
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-7, Mumbai
1
O/o The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-7, Mumbai
2
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit)-5, Mumbai
3
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-5(1), Mumbai
4
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-5(2), Mumbai
5
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-5(3), Mumbai
6
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-5(4), Mumbai
7
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit)-6, Mumbai
8
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-6(1), Mumbai
9
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-6(2), Mumbai
10
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-6(3), Mumbai
11
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-6(4), Mumbai
12
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit)-7, Mumbai
13
O/o The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-7(1), Mumbai
14
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-7(2), Mumbai
15
O/o The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit),-7(3), Mumbai
16
O/o The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit),-7(4), Mumbai
17
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax(Review Unit)-2, Mumbai
18
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Review Unit)-2(1), Mumbai
19
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Review Unit)-2(2), Mumbai
20
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Review Unit)-2(3), Mumbai
The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-8, Mumbai
1
O/o The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-8, Mumbai
2
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit)-9, Mumbai
3
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-9(1), Mumbai
4
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-9(2), Mumbai
5
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-9(3), Mumbai
6
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-9(4), Mumbai
7
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit)-10, Mumbai
8
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-10(1), Mumbai
9
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-10(2), Mumbai
10
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-10(3), Mumbai
11
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-10(4), Mumbai
12
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit)-11, Mumbai
1040
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
13
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-11(1), Mumbai
14
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-11(2), Mumbai
15
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-11(3), Mumbai
16
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit)-11(4), Mumbai
17
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit)-12, Mumbai
18
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-12(1),Mumbai.
19
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-12(2),Mumbai.
20
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-12(3), Mumbai.
21
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-12(4), Mumbai.
The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-9, Mumbai
1
O/o The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-9, Mumbai
2
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit)-13, Mumbai
3
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-13(1),Mumbai
4
O/o The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-13(2),Mumbai
5
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-13(3), Mumbai
6
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-13(4), Mumbai
7
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit)-14, Mumbai
8
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-14(1), Mumbai
9
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-14(2), Mumbai
10
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-14(3), Mumbai
11
O/o The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-14(4),Mumbai
12
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit)-15, Mumbai
13
O/o The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-15(1),Mumbai
14
O/o The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-15(2),Mumbai
15
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-15(3), Mumbai
16
O/o The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-15(4), Mumbai
17
O/o The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit)-16, Mumbai
18
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-16(1), Mumbai
19
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-16(2), Mumbai
20
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-16(3), Mumbai
21
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-16(4), Mumbai
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-10, Mumbai
1
O/o The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax-10, Mumbai
2
O/o The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax(Verification Unit))-1, Mumbai
3
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax(Verification Unit)-1(1), Mumbai
4
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax(Verification Unit)-1(2), Mumbai
5
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax(Verification Unit)-1(3), Mumbai
6
O/o The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax(Verification Unit)-2, Mumbai
7
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax(Verification Unit)-2(1), Mumbai
8
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax(Verification Unit)-2(2), Mumbai
9
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax(Verification Unit)-2(3), Mumbai
10
O/o The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax(Verification Unit)-3, Mumbai
11
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax(Verification Unit)-3(1), Mumbai
12
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax(Verification Unit)-3(2), Mumbai
13
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax(Verification Unit)-3(3), Mumbai
14
O/o The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax(Technical Unit)-1, Mumbai
15
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax(Technical Unit)-1(1), Mumbai
16
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax(Technical Unit)-1(2), Mumbai
17
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax(Technical Unit)-1(3), Mumbai
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1041
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-11, Mumbai
1
O/o The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax-11, Mumbai
2
O/o The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax(Review Unit)-1, Mumbai
3
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax(Review Unit)-1(1), Mumbai
4
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax(Review Unit)-1(2), Mumbai
5
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax(Review Unit)-1(3), Mumbai
6
O/o The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Assessment Unit))-1 Mumbai
7
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit)-1(1), Mumbai
8
O/o The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit)-1(2), Mumbai
9
O/o The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit)-1(3), Mumbai
10
O/o The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit)-1(4), Mumbai
11
O/o The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Assessment Unit))-2, Mumbai
12
O/o The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit))-2(1), Mumbai
13
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit)-2(2), Mumbai
14
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit)-2(3), Mumbai
15
O/o The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit))-2(4), Mumbai
16
O/o The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-3, Mumbai
17
O/o The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit)-3(1), Mumbai
18
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit)-3(2), Mumbai
19
O/o The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit)-3(3), Mumbai
20
O/o The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit)-3(4), Mumbai
21
O/o The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-4, Mumbai
22
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit)-4(1), Mumbai
23
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax(Assessment Unit)-4 (2), Mumbai
24
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-4 (3), Mumbai
25
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment Unit)-4 (4), Mumbai
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax(Central)-1, Mumbai
1
O/o The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax(Central)-1, Mumbai
2
O/o The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central)-1, Mumbai
3
O/o The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Range-1, Mumbai
4
O/o The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Range-2, Mumbai
5
O/o The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central)-4, Mumbai
6
O/o The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Range-7, Mumbai
7
O/o The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Range-8, Mumbai
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax(Central)-2, Mumbai
1
O/o The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax(Central)-2, Mumbai
2
O/o The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central)-2, Mumbai
3
O/o The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Range-3, Mumbai
4
O/o The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Range-4, Mumbai
5
O/o The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central)-3, Mumbai
6
O/o The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Range-5, Mumbai
7
O/o The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Range-6, Mumbai
Director General of Income Tax(Investigation), Mumbai
1
O/o The Director General of Income Tax(Investigation), Mumbai
2
O/o Principal Director of Income Tax(Investigation)-1, Mumbai
3
O/o Additional Director of Income Tax(Investigation), Unit-1, Mumbai
4
O/o The Additional Director of Income Tax(Investigation), Unit-2, Mumbai
5
O/o The Additional Director of Income Tax(Investigation), Unit-3 , Mumbai
6
O/o The Additional Director of Income Tax(Investigation), Unit-4, Mumbai
1042
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
7
O/o The Additional Director of Income Tax(Investigation)(FAIU)-1, Mumbai
8
O/o The Additional Director of Income Tax(Investigation)(FAIU)-2, Mumbai
9
O/o The Principal Director of Income Tax(Investigation)-2, Mumbai
10
O/o The Additional Director of Income Tax Investigation), U-5, Mumbai
11
O/o The Additional Director of Income Tax(Investigation), U-6, Mumbai
12
O/o The Additional Director of Income Tax(Investigation)(FAIU)-3, Mumbai
13
O/o The Additional Director of Income Tax(Investigation), U-7, Mumbai
14
O/o The Additional Director of Income Tax(Investigation), U-8, Mumbai
15
O/o The Additional Director of Income Tax(Investigation)(FAIU)-4, Mumbai
16
O/o The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax(BPU)-1, Mumbai
17
O/o The Additional Director of Income Tax( BPU)-2, Mumbai
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax(International Taxation)(West Zone), Mumbai
1
O/o The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax(International Taxation &Transfer Pricing)West Zone, Mumbai
2
O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax(International Taxation)-1, Mumbai
3
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-1(1), Mumbai
4
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax((International Taxation)-1(2), Mumbai
5
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)- 1(3), Mumbai
6
O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax(International Taxation)-2, Mumbai
7
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-2(1), Mumbai
8
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-2(2), Mumbai
9
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-2(3), Mumbai
10
O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-3, Mumbai
11
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation) Range-3(1), Mumbai
12
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation) Range-3(2), Mumbai
13
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation) Range-3(3), Mumbai
14
O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-4, Mumbai
15
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation) Range-4(1), Mumbai
16
O/o The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation) Range-4(2), Mumbai
17
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation) Range-4(3), Mumbai
18
O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax (Transfer Pricing)-1, Mumbai
19
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Transfer Pricing) Range-1(1), Mumbai
20
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Transfer Pricing) Range-1(2), Mumbai
21
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Transfer Pricing) Range-1(3), Mumbai
22
O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax (Transfer Pricing)-2, Mumbai
23
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Transfer Pricing) Range-2(1), Mumbai
24
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Transfer Pricing) Range-2(2), Mumbai
25
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Transfer Pricing) Range-2(3), Mumbai
26
O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax (Transfer Pricing)-3, Mumbai
27
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Transfer Pricing) Range-3(1), Mumbai
28
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Transfer Pricing) Range-3(2), Mumbai
29
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Transfer Pricing) Range-3(3), Mumbai
30
O/o The Commissioner of Income Tax(Transfer Pricing)-4, Mumbai
31
O/o The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax(Transfer Pricing) Range4(1), Mumbai
32
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Transfer Pricing) Range-4(2), Mumbai
33
O/o The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Transfer Pricing) Range-4(3), Mumbai
34
O/o The Commissioner of Income TaxCIT(Dispute Resolution Panel)-1, Mumbai-1
35
O/o The Commissioner of Income TaxCIT(Dispute Resolution Panel)-1, Mumbai-2
36
O/o The Commissioner of Income TaxCIT(Dispute Resolution Panel)-1, Mumbai -3
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1043
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-TDS, Mumbai
1
O/o The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax-(Tax Deducted at Source), Mumbai
2
O/o The Commissioner Of Income Tax-(Tax Deducted at Source)-1,Mumbai
3
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax(Tax Deducted at Source) -1(1), Mumbai
4
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax(Tax Deducted at Source) -1(2), Mumbai
5
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax(Tax Deducted at Source)-1(3), Mumbai
6
O/o The Commissioner Of Income Tax-(Tax Deducted at Source)-2, Mumbai
7
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax(Tax Deducted at Source)-2(1), Mumbai
8
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax(Tax Deducted at Source)-2(2), Mumbai
9
O/o The Additional/Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax(Tax Deducted at Source-2(3), Mumbai
[F. No. E-30018/1/2024-D.D(O.L) DOR]
SHISHIR SHARMA, Jt. Director (OL)
संर्ार मंत्रालय
(डाक जवभाग)
नई दिल्ली, 27 िनवरी, 2025
का.आ. 364.—केन् र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम, 1976 (यथा
संिोजित 1987) के जनयम 10 के उप जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, डाक जवभाग के जनम् नजलजखत अिीनस्ट् थ कायाचलय, जिसके
80 प्रजतित से अजिक अजिकाररयों/कमचर्ाररयों ने जिन् िी का कायचसािक ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जलया िै, को एति् द्वारा अजिसूजर्त
करती िै:-
प्रिान डाकघर,
प्रतापगढ- 230001
[फाा. सं ई-11017-1/2024-रा.भा.]
एम. यू. अब्िाली, उप मिाजनिेिक (ईएमएम/रा.भा.)
MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS
(Department of Posts)
New Delhi, the 27th January, 2025
S.O. 364.—In Pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official Purposes of the
Union) Rules 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies following Sub-ordinate office of the
Department of Posts, where more than 80% Officers/Officials have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-
Head Post Office,
Pratapgarh- 230001
[F. No. E-11017-1/2024-OL]
M. U. ABDALI, Dy. Director General (EMM/OL)
नई दिल्ली, 27 िनवरी, 2025
का.आ. 365—केन् र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976 (यथा संिोजित
1987) के जनयम 10 के उप जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, डाक जवभाग के जनम् नजलजखत अिीनस्ट् थ कायाचलय, जिसके
1044
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
80 प्रजतित से अजिक अजिकाररयों/कमचर्ाररयों ने जिन् िी का कायचसािक ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जलया िै, को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजर्त
करती िै:-
प्रिान डाकघर,
प्रयागराि- 211001
[फाा. सं ई-11017-1/2024-रा.भा.]
एम. यू. अब्िाली, उप मिाजनिेिक (ईएमएम/रा.भा.)
New Delhi, the 27th January, 2025
S.O. 365.—In Pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official Purposes of the
Union) Rules 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies following Sub-ordinate office of the
Department of Posts, where more than 80% Officers/Officials have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-
Head Post Office,
Prayagraj- 211001
[F. No. E-11017-1/2024-OL]
M. U. ABDALI, Dy. Director General (EMM/OL)
नई दिल्ली, 27 िनवरी, 2025
का.आ. 366.—केन् र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976 (यथा
संिोजित 1987) के जनयम 10 के उप जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, डाक जवभाग के जनम् नजलजखत अिीनस्ट् थ कायाचलय, जिसके
80 प्रजतित से अजिक अजिकाररयों/कमचर्ाररयों ने जिन् िी का कायचसािक ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जलया िै, को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजर्त
करती िै:-
अिीक्षक डाकघर का कायाचलय,
जमिाचपुर मंडल
जमिाचपुर - 231001
[फाा. सं ई-11017-1/2024-रा.भा.]
एम. यू. अब्िाली, उप मिाजनिेिक (ईएमएम/रा.भा.)
New Delhi, the 27th January, 2025
S.O. 366.—In Pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official Purposes of the
Union) Rules 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies following Sub-ordinate office of the
Department of Posts, where more than 80% Officers/Officials have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-
Office of the Supdt. of Post Offices,
Mirzapur Division,
Mirzapur- 231001
[F. No. E-11017-1/2024-OL]
M. U. ABDALI, Dy. Director General (EMM/OL)
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1045
नई दिल्ली, 27 िनवरी, 2025
का.आ. 367.—केन् र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976 (यथा
संिोजित 1987) के जनयम 10 के उप जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, डाक जवभाग के जनम् नजलजखत अिीनस्ट् थ कायाचलय, जिसके
80 प्रजतित से अजिक अजिकाररयों/कमचर्ाररयों ने जिन् िी का कायचसािक ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जलया िै, को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजर्त
करती िै:-
डाक मिाध्यक्ष का कायाचलय,
पंिाब पजिम क्षेत्र,
र्ंडीगढ़- 160017
[फाा. सं ई-11017-1/2024-रा.भा.]
एम. यू. अब्िाली, उप मिाजनिेिक (ईएमएम/रा.भा.)
New Delhi, the 27th January, 2025
S.O. 367.—In Pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official Purposes of the
Union) Rules 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies following Sub-ordinate office of the
Department of Posts, where more than 80% Officers/Officials have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-
Postmaster General,
Punjab West Region,
Chandigarh- 160017
[F. No. E-11017-1/2024-OL]
M. U. ABDALI, Dy. Director General (EMM/OL)
नई दिल्ली, 27 िनवरी, 2025
का.आ. 368.—केन् र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976 (यथा
संिोजित 1987) के जनयम 10 के उप जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, डाक जवभाग के जनम् नजलजखत अिीनस्ट् थ कायाचलय, जिसके
80 प्रजतित से अजिक अजिकाररयों/कमचर्ाररयों ने जिन् िी का कायचसािक ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जलया िै, को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजर्त
करती िै:-
प्रवर अिीक्षक डाकघर का कायाचलय,
अमृतसर मंडल
अमृतसर- 143001
[फाा. सं ई-11017-1/2024-रा.भा.]
एम. यू. अब्िाली, उप मिाजनिेिक (ईएमएम/रा.भा.)
New Delhi, the 27th January, 2025
S.O. 368.—In Pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official Purposes of the
Union) Rules 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies following Sub-ordinate office of the
Department of Posts, where more than 80% Officers/Officials have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-
Office of the Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices,
Amritsar Division,
Amritsar- 143001
[F. No. E-11017-1/2024-OL]
M. U. ABDALI, Dy. Director General (EMM/OL)
1046
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
नई दिल्ली, 27 िनवरी, 2025
का.आ. 369.—केन् र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976 (यथा
संिोजित 1987) के जनयम 10 के उप जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, डाक जवभाग के जनम् नजलजखत अिीनस्ट् थ कायाचलय, जिसके
80 प्रजतित से अजिक अजिकाररयों/कमचर्ाररयों ने जिन् िी का कायचसािक ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जलया िै, को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजर्त
करती िै:-
पोस्ट्टमास्ट्टर िनरल का कायाचलय,
नवी मुंबई क्षेत्र,
पनवेल- 410206
[फाा. सं ई-11017-1/2024-रा.भा.]
एम. यू. अब्िाली, उप मिाजनिेिक (ईएमएम/रा.भा.)
New Delhi, the 27th January, 2025
S.O. 369.—In Pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official Purposes of the
Union) Rules 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies following Sub-ordinate office of the
Department of Posts, where more than 80% Officers/Officials have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-
Office of the Postmaster General,
Navi Mumbai Region,
Panvel- 410206
[F. No. E-11017-1/2024-OL]
M. U. ABDALI, Dy. Director General (EMM/OL)
नई दिल्ली, 27 िनवरी, 2025
का.आ. 370.—केन् र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976 (यथा
संिोजित 1987) के जनयम 10 के उप जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, डाक जवभाग के जनम् नजलजखत अिीनस्ट् थ कायाचलय, जिसके
80 प्रजतित से अजिक अजिकाररयों/कमचर्ाररयों ने जिन् िी का कायचसािक ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जलया िै, को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजर्त
करती िै:-
अिीक्षक डाकघर का कायाचलय,
जिवमोग्गा मण्डल,
जिवमोग्गा- 577202
[फाा. सं ई-11017-1/2024-रा.भा.]
एम. यू. अब्िाली, उप मिाजनिेिक (ईएमएम/रा.भा.)
New Delhi, the 27th January, 2025
S.O. 370.—In Pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official Purposes of the
Union) Rules 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies following Sub-ordinate office of the
Department of Posts, where more than 80% Officers/Officials have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-
Office of the Superintendent of Post Offices,
Shivamogga Division,
Shivamogga - 577202
[F. No. E-11017-1/2024-OL]
M. U. ABDALI, Dy. Director General (EMM/OL)
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1047
नई दिल्ली, 27 िनवरी, 2025
का.आ. 371.—केन् र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976 (यथा
संिोजित 1987) के जनयम 10 के उप जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, डाक जवभाग के जनम् नजलजखत अिीनस्ट् थ कायाचलय, जिसके
80 प्रजतित से अजिक अजिकाररयों/कमचर्ाररयों ने जिन् िी का कायचसािक ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जलया िै, को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजर्त
करती िै:-
प्रवर अिीक्षक डाकघर का कायाचलय,
प्रयागराि जडवीिन,
प्रयागराि- 211001
[फाा. सं ई-11017-1/2024-रा.भा.]
एम. यू. अब्िाली, उप मिाजनिेिक (ईएमएम/रा.भा.)
New Delhi, the 27th January, 2025
S.O. 371.—In Pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official Purposes of the
Union) Rules 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies following Sub-ordinate office of the
Department of Posts, where more than 80% Officers/Officials have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-
Office of the Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices,
Prayagraj Division
Prayagraj- 211001
[F. No. E-11017-1/2024-OL]
M. U. ABDALI, Dy. Director General (EMM/OL)
नई दिल्ली, 27 िनवरी, 2025
का.आ. 372.—केन् र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976 (यथा संिोजित
1987) के जनयम 10 के उप जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, डाक जवभाग के जनम् नजलजखत अिीनस्ट् थ कायाचलय, जिसके 80 प्रजतित
से अजिक अजिकाररयों/कमचर्ाररयों ने जिन् िी का कायचसािक ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जलया िै, को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजर्त करती िै:-
प्रवर अिीक्षक का कायाचलय
रेल डाक सेवा ‘ए’ मंडल
प्रयागराि- 211001
[फाा. सं ई-11017-1/2024-रा.भा.]
एम. यू. अब्िाली, उप मिाजनिेिक (ईएमएम/रा.भा.)
New Delhi, the 27th January, 2025
S.O. 372.—In Pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official Purposes of the
Union) Rules 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies following Sub-ordinate office of the
Department of Posts, where more than 80% Officers/Officials have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-
Office of the Sr. Supdt.
Rail Mail Service ‘A’ Division
Prayagraj- 211001
[F. No. E-11017-1/2024-OL]
M. U. ABDALI, Dy. Director General (EMM/OL)
1048
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
नई दिल्ली, 27 िनवरी, 2025
का.आ. 373.—केन् र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976 (यथा
संिोजित 1987) के जनयम 10 के उप जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, डाक जवभाग के जनम् नजलजखत अिीनस्ट् थ कायाचलय, जिसके
80 प्रजतित से अजिक अजिकाररयों/कमचर्ाररयों ने जिन् िी का कायचसािक ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जलया िै, को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजर्त
करती िै:-
अिीक्षक डाकघर का कायाचलय,
प्रतापगढ़ मंडल,
प्रतापगढ़- 230001
[फाा. सं ई-11017-1/2024-रा.भा.]
एम. यू. अब्िाली, उप मिाजनिेिक (ईएमएम/रा.भा.)
New Delhi, the 27th January, 2025
S.O. 373.—In Pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official Purposes of the
Union) Rules 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies following Sub-ordinate office of the
Department of Posts, where more than 80% Officers/Officials have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-
Office of the Supdt. of Post Offices,
Pratapgarh Division,
Pratapgarh – 230001
[F. No. E-11017-1/2024-OL]
M. U. ABDALI, Dy. Director General (EMM/OL)
नई दिल्ली, 27 िनवरी, 2025
का.आ. 374.—केन् र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976 (यथा संिोजित
1987) के जनयम 10 के उप जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, डाक जवभाग के जनम् नजलजखत अिीनस्ट् थ कायाचलय, जिसके 80 प्रजतित
से अजिक अजिकाररयों/कमचर्ाररयों ने जिन् िी का कायचसािक ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जलया िै, को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजर्त करती िै:-
अिीक्षक डाकघर का कायाचलय,
सुल्तानपुर मंडल,
सुल्तानपुर- 228001
[फाा. सं ई-11017-1/2024-रा.भा.]
एम. यू. अब्िाली, उप मिाजनिेिक (ईएमएम/रा.भा.)
New Delhi, the 27th January, 2025
S.O. 374.—In Pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official Purposes of the
Union) Rules 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies following Sub-ordinate office of the
Department of Posts, where more than 80% Officers/Officials have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-
Office of the Supdt. of Post Offices,
Sultanpur Division,
Sultanpur- 228001
[F. No. E-11017-1/2024-OL]
M. U. ABDALI, Dy. Director General (EMM/OL)
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1049
नई दिल्ली, 27 िनवरी, 2025
का.आ. 375.—केन् र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976 (यथा
संिोजित 1987) के जनयम 10 के उप जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, डाक जवभाग के जनम् नजलजखत अिीनस्ट् थ कायाचलय,
जिसके 80 प्रजतित से अजिक अजिकाररयों/कमचर्ाररयों ने जिन् िी का कायचसािक ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जलया िै, को एतिद्वारा
अजिसूजर्त करती िै:-
प्रवर अिीक्षक डाकघर का कायाचलय,
वाराणसी पूवी मंडल,
वाराणसी- 221001
[फाा. सं ई-11017-1/2024-रा.भा.]
एम. यू. अब्िाली, उप मिाजनिेिक (ईएमएम/रा.भा.)
New Delhi, the 27th January, 2025
S.O. 375.—In Pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official Purposes of the
Union) Rules 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies following Sub-ordinate office of the
Department of Posts, where more than 80% Officers/Officials have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-
Office of the Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices,
Varanasi East Division,
Varanasi- 221001
[F. No. E-11017-1/2024-OL]
M. U. ABDALI, Dy. Director General (EMM/OL)
नई दिल्ली, 27 िनवरी, 2025
का.आ. 376.—केन् र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976 (यथा
संिोजित 1987) के जनयम 10 के उप जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, डाक जवभाग के जनम् नजलजखत अिीनस्ट् थ कायाचलय, जिसके
80 प्रजतित से अजिक अजिकाररयों/कमचर्ाररयों ने जिन् िी का कायचसािक ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जलया िै, को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजर्त
करती िै:-
प्रिान डाकघर वाराणसी,
वाराणसी- 221001
[फाा. सं ई-11017-1/2024-रा.भा.]
एम. यू. अब्िाली, उप मिाजनिेिक (ईएमएम/रा.भा.)
New Delhi, the 27th January, 2025
S.O. 376—In Pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official Purposes of the Union)
Rules 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies following Sub-ordinate office of the Department
of Posts, where more than 80% Officers/Officials have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-
Varanasi Head Office, under Varanasi East Division
Varanasi- 221001
[F. No. E-11017-1/2024-OL]
M. U. ABDALI, Dy. Director General (EMM/OL)
1050
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
नई दिल्ली, 27 िनवरी, 2025
का.आ. 377.—केन् र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976 (यथा
संिोजित 1987) के जनयम 10 के उप जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, डाक जवभाग के जनम् नजलजखत अिीनस्ट् थ कायाचलय, जिसके
80 प्रजतित से अजिक अजिकाररयों/कमचर्ाररयों ने जिन् िी का कायचसािक ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जलया िै, को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजर्त
करती िै:-
अिीक्षक डाकघर का कायाचलय,
वाराणसी पजिमी मंडल,
वाराणसी- 221002
[फाा. सं ई-11017-1/2024-रा.भा.]
एम. यू. अब्िाली, उप मिाजनिेिक (ईएमएम/रा.भा.)
New Delhi, the 27th January, 2025
S.O. 377.—In Pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official Purposes of the
Union) Rules 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies following Sub-ordinate office of the
Department of Posts, where more than 80% Officers/Officials have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-
Office of the Supdt. of Post Offices,
Varanasi West Division,
Varanasi- 221002
[F. No. E-11017-1/2024-OL]
M. U. ABDALI, Dy. Director General (EMM/OL)
नई दिल्ली, 27 िनवरी, 2025
का.आ. 378.—केन् र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976 (यथा
संिोजित 1987) के जनयम 10 के उप जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, डाक जवभाग के जनम् नजलजखत अिीनस्ट् थ कायाचलय, जिसके
80 प्रजतित से अजिक अजिकाररयों/कमचर्ाररयों ने जिन् िी का कायचसािक ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जलया िै, को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजर्त
करती िै:-
वाराणसी कैंट प्रिान डाकघर,
वाराणसी- 221002
[फाा. सं ई-11017-1/2024-रा.भा.]
एम. यू. अब्िाली, उप मिाजनिेिक (ईएमएम/रा.भा.)
New Delhi, the 27th January, 2025
S.O. 378—In Pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official Purposes of the Union)
Rules 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies following Sub-ordinate office of the Department
of Posts, where more than 80% Officers/Officials have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-
Varanasi cantt HO, under Varanasi West Division,
Varanasi- 221002
[F. No. E-11017-1/2024-OL]
M. U. ABDALI, Dy. Director General (EMM/OL)
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1051
नई दिल्ली, 27 िनवरी, 2025
का.आ. 379.—केन् र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976 (यथा
संिोजित 1987) के जनयम 10 के उप जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, डाक जवभाग के जनम् नजलजखत अिीनस्ट् थ कायाचलय, जिसके
80 प्रजतित से अजिक अजिकाररयों/कमचर्ाररयों ने जिन् िी का कायचसािक ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जलया िै, को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजर्त
करती िै:-
अिीक्षक डाकघर का कायाचलय,
िौनपुर मंडल ,
िौनपुर- 222001
[फाा. सं ई-11017-1/2024-रा.भा.]
एम. यू. अब्िाली, उप मिाजनिेिक (ईएमएम/रा.भा.)
New Delhi, the 27th January, 2025
S.O. 379—In Pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official Purposes of the
Union) Rules 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies following Sub-ordinate office of the
Department of Posts, where more than 80% Officers/Officials have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-
Office of the Supdt. of Post Offices,
Jaunpur Division,
Jaunpur- 222001
[F. No. E-11017-1/2024-OL]
M. U. ABDALI, Dy. Director General (EMM/OL)
नई दिल्ली, 27 िनवरी, 2025
का.आ. 380.—केन् र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976 (यथा
संिोजित 1987) के जनयम 10 के उप जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, डाक जवभाग के जनम् नजलजखत अिीनस्ट् थ कायाचलय, जिसके
80 प्रजतित से अजिक अजिकाररयों/कमचर्ाररयों ने जिन् िी का कायचसािक ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जलया िै, को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजर्त
करती िै:-
अिीक्षक डाकघर का कायाचलय,
बजलया मंडल,
बजलया- 277001
[फाा. सं ई-11017-1/2024-रा.भा.]
एम. यू. अब्िाली, उप मिाजनिेिक (ईएमएम/रा.भा.)
New Delhi, the 27th January, 2025
S.O. 380—In Pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official Purposes of the
Union) Rules 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies following Sub-ordinate office of the
Department of Posts, where more than 80% Officers/Officials have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-
Office of the Supdt. of Post Offices,
Ballia Division,
Ballia- 277001
[F. No. E-11017-1/2024-OL]
M. U. ABDALI, Dy. Director General (EMM/OL)
1052
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
नई दिल्ली, 27 िनवरी, 2025
का.आ. 381.—केन् र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976 (यथा
संिोजित 1987) के जनयम 10 के उप जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, डाक जवभाग के जनम् नजलजखत अिीनस्ट् थ कायाचलय, जिसके
80 प्रजतित से अजिक अजिकाररयों/कमचर्ाररयों ने जिन् िी का कायचसािक ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जलया िै, को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजर्त
करती िै:-
अिीक्षक डाकघर का कायाचलय,
गािीपुर मंडल,
गािीपुर- 233001
[फाा. सं ई-11017-1/2024-रा.भा.]
एम. यू. अब्िाली, उप मिाजनिेिक (ईएमएम/रा.भा.)
New Delhi, the 27th January, 2025
S.O. 381.—In Pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official Purposes of the
Union) Rules 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies following Sub-ordinate office of the
Department of Posts, where more than 80% Officers/Officials have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-
Office of the Supdt. of Post Offices,
Ghazipur Division,
Ghazipur - 233001
[F. No. E-11017-1/2024-OL]
M. U. ABDALI, Dy. Director General (EMM/OL)
नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी, 2025
का.आ. 382.—केन् र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम 1976 (यथा
संिोजित 1987) के जनयम 10 के उप जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, डाक जवभाग के जनम् नजलजखत अिीनस्ट् थ कायाचलय, जिसके
80 प्रजतित से अजिक अजिकाररयों/कमचर्ाररयों ने जिन् िी का कायचसािक ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जलया िै, को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजर्त
करती िै:-
मुख्य पोस्ट्टमास्ट्टर िनरल का कायाचलय,
छत्तीसगढ़ सकचल
रायपुर- 492001
[फाा. सं ई-11017-1/2024-रा.भा.]
एम. यू. अब्िाली, उप मिाजनिेिक (ईएमएम/रा.भा.)
New Delhi, the 10th February, 2025
S.O. 382.—In Pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official Purposes of the
Union) Rules 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies following Sub-ordinate office of the
Department of Posts, where more than 80% Officers/Officials have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-
Office of the chief Postmaster General,
Chhattisgarh Circle,
Raipur – 492001
[F. No. E-11017-1/2024-OL]
M. U. ABDALI, Dy. Director General (EMM/OL)
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1053
पेरोजलयम और प्राकृजतक गैस मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली, 28 फरवरी, 2025
का.आ. 383.—भारत सरकार ने पेरोजलयम और खजनि पाइपलाइन (भूजम में उपयोग के अजिकार का अिचन)
अजिजनयम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पिात् उक्त अजिजनयम किा गया िै) की िारा 3 की उपिारा (1) के
अिीन िारी भारत सरकार के पेरोजलयम और प्राकृजतक गैस मंत्रालय की अजिसूर्ना संख्या का.आ. 1807 तारीख
09.11.2023 िो भारत के साप्ताजिक रािपत्र तारीख 19.11.2023 – 25.11.2023, में प्रकाजित की गयी थी, द्वारा उस
अजिसूर्ना से संलग्न अनुसूर्ी में जवजनर्िचष्ट भूजम में गेल (इजण्डया) जलजमटेड द्वारा मिाराष्ट्र राज्य में उरण – उसर प्रोपेन
पाइपलाइन के माध्यम से तरलीकृत प्रोपेन के पररविन के जलए पाइपलाइन जबछाने के प्रयोिन के जलए उपयोग के
अजिकार का अिचन करने के अपने आिय की घोषणा की थी;
और उक्त रािपत्र अजिसूर्ना की प्रजतयां िनता को उपलब्ि करा िी गई थी;
और सक्षम प्राजिकारी ने िनता से प्राप्त आक्षेपों को परीक्षण के उपरांत जनपटान कर दिया िै;
और सक्षम प्राजिकारी ने, उक्त अजिजनयम की िारा 6 की उपिारा (1) के अिीन भारत सरकार को अपनी ररपोटच
िे िी िै;
और भारत सरकार ने, उक्त ररपोटच पर जवर्ार करने के पिात् और यि संतुष्ट िो िाने पर दक उक्त भूजम
पाइपलाइन जबछाने के जलए अपेजक्षत िै, उस में उपयोग के अजिकार का अिचन करने का जवजनिय दकया िै;
अतः अब, भारत सरकार, उक्त अजिजनयम की िारा 6 की उपिारा (1) द्वारा प्रित्त्त िजक्तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए,
यि घोषणा करती िै दक इस अजिसूर्ना से संलग्न अनुसूर्ी में जवजनर्िचष्ट भूजम में पाइपलाइन जबछाने के जलए उपयोग के
अजिकार का अिचन दकया िाता िै;
और, भारत सरकार, उक्त अजिजनयम की िारा 6 दक उपिारा (4) द्वारा प्रित्त्त िजक्तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए,
जनिेि िेती िै दक पाइपलाइन जबछाने के जलए भूजम में उपयोग का अजिकार, इस घोषणा के प्रकािन की तारीख से, भारत
सरकार में जनजित िोने के बिाए, सभी जवल्लंगमों से मुक्त िोकर, गेल (इजण्डया) जलजमटेड में जनजित िोगा।
उरण – उसर प्रोपेन पाईप लाईन
अनुसूर्ी
राज् य :मिाराष् र
जिला
तिसील
गााँव
स.नं.
क्षेत्र
िेक्त्टेयर
आर
वगच मीटर
1
2
3
4
5
रायगड
उरण
िुई
129
00
00
35
रायगड
उरण
कळंबूसरे
93
00
39
38
95/1
00
11
41
रायगड
पनवेल
दिघाटी
51/1/अ
00
00
10
रायगड
पनवेल
साई
246/1
00
08
07
1054
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
246/2
00
09
10
246/3
00
04
64
2/5
00
04
85
7
00
23
92
10/3
00
01
80
रायगड
पेण
रावे
7
00
02
93
23
00
02
02
रायगड
पेण
कोपर
45/3
00
06
60
44
00
10
40
45/5
00
00
57
41/1
00
04
33
40/1
00
02
85
40/2
00
06
11
39/1/ब
00
02
12
40/4
00
08
79
29/3
00
06
10
60/6
00
06
59
रायगड
पेण
ओढांगी
202
00
15
78
रायगड
अजलबाग
ििाबाि
487
00
07
17
491
00
02
57
987
00
00
30
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1055
667
00
11
25
900
00
10
50
901
00
03
00
[फाा. सं एल-14014/ 27 /2023-िीपी-II (ई-47395 )]
रामिीलाल मीना, अवर सजर्व
MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
New Delhi, the 28th February, 2025
S.O. 383.—Whereas by Notification of Government of India, in Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas vide
S.O.No 1807 dated 09.11.2023; issued under sub - section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum & Minerals Pipelines
(Acquisition of right of users in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), published in the
Weekly Gazette of India dated 19.11.2023 – 25.11.2023, the Government of India declared its intention to acquire
the right of user in the lands specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Pipeline
for transportation of Liquid Propane through Uran – Usar Propane pipeline in the State of Maharashtra by GAIL
(India) Limited;
And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public;
And whereas the objections received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered of by
the Competent Authority;
And whereas the Competent Authority has, under sub-section (1) of section (6) of the said Act, submitted its
report to Government of India;
And whereas Government of India after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land
is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire the Right of User therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub section (1) of section (6) of the said Act, the
Government of India hereby declares that the Right of User in the said lands specified in the Schedule appended to
this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And, further, in exercise of powers conferred by sub section (4) of the Section (6) of the said Act, Government of
India hereby directs the Right of User in the land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in Government of
India, vest, on this date of the publication of the declaration, in the GAIL (India) Limited, free from all encumbrances.
URAN – USAR PROPANE PIPE LINE
SCHEDULE
State: Maharashtra
District
Tehsil
Village
Survey No.
Area
Hect.
Are.
Sq. Mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
RAIGAD
URAN
JUI
129
00
00
35
RAIGAD
URAN
KALAMBUSARE
93
00
39
38
95/1
00
11
41
1056
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
RAIGAD
PANVEL
DIGHATI
51/1/A
00
00
10
RAIGAD
PANVEL
SAI
246/1
00
08
07
246/2
00
09
10
246/3
00
04
64
2/5
00
04
85
7
00
23
92
10/3
00
01
80
RAIGAD
PEN
RAVE
7
00
02
93
23
00
02
02
RAIGAD
PEN
KOPAR
45/3
00
06
60
44
00
10
40
45/5
00
00
57
41/1
00
04
33
40/1
00
02
85
40/2
00
06
11
39/1/B
00
02
12
40/4
00
08
79
29/3
00
06
10
60/6
00
06
59
RAIGAD
PEN
Odhangi
202
00
15
78
RAIGAD
ALIBAG
SHAHABAJ
487
00
07
17
491
00
02
57
987
00
00
30
667
00
11
25
900
00
10
50
901
00
03
00
[F. No. L-14014/27/2023-GP-II (E- 47395)]
RAMJILAL MEENA, Under Secy.
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1057
नई दिल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 384.—केन्रीय सरकार ने पेरोजलयम और खजनि पाइपलाइन (भूजम में उपयोग के अजिकार का अिचन)
अजिजनयम,1962 (1962 का 50) की िारा 6 की उपिारा (1) के अिीन िारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेरोजलयम और
प्राकृजतक गैस मंत्रालय की नीर्े िी गई अनुसूर्ी में यथा उजल्लजखत तारीखों की एवम का. आ. द्वारा उन अजिसूर्नाओं से
संलग्न अनुसूर्ी में जवजनर्िचष्ट भूजम में उपयोग के अजिकार का अिचन दकया था|
और केन्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त अजिजनयम की िारा 6 की उपिारा (4) द्वारा प्रित्त िजक्तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए,
उक्त भूजमयों में, सभी जवल्लंगमों से मुक्त, उपयोग का अजिकार आई एर् बी जलजमटेड में जनजित दकया था|
और सक्षम प्राजिकारी ने केन्रीय सरकार को ररपोटच िी िै दक पेरोजलयम उत्पाि के पररविन के जलए मध्य-प्रिेि
राज्य में आई एर् बी जलजमटेड की कांडला गोरखपुर एल.पी.िी. पाइपलाइन जबछाई िा र्ुकी िैं, अतः उस भूजम के बारे में,
जिसका संजक्षप्त जववरण इस अजिसूर्ना से संलग्न अनुसूर्ी से जवजनर्िचष्ट दकया गया िैं, ऐसे प्रर्ालन को मध्य-प्रिेि राज्य में
समाप्त दकया िाए|
अतः अब, केन्रीय सरकार, पेरोजलयम और खजनि पाइपलाइन (भूजम में उपयोग के अजिकार का अिचन) 1963 के
जनयम 4 के स्ट्पष्टीकरण – 1 के अिीन उस तारीख को जिस पर यि अजिसूर्ना भारत के रािपत्र में प्रकाजित िोती िैं,
मध्य-प्रिेि राज्य के इन्िौर एवं िेवास जिले के नीर्े वर्णचत गााँवो में मागाचजिकार गजतजवजियों की समाप्ती की तारीख के
रूप में घोजषत करती िैं |
अनुसूर्ी
जिला: इन्िौर राज्य : मध्य प्रिेि
क्रमांक
का. आ. सं. एवं दिनांक
िाम का नाम
तिसील
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1.
का.आ.4000(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
आमली
िेपालपुर
2.
का.आ.4000(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
रामबडोदिया
िेपालपुर
3.
का.आ.4000(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
सेिवानी
िेपालपुर
4.
का.आ.4000(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
का.आ.5394(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
का.आ.4818(अ)दिनांक.10.10.2022
िुरेरी
िेपालपुर
5.
का.आ.4000(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
का.आ.2278(अ)दिनांक.08.05.2023
रामपुररया
िेपालपुर
6.
का.आ.4000(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
रोलाय
िेपालपुर
7.
का.आ.4000(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
खतेजडया सारंग
िेपालपुर
8.
का.आ.4000(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
बेटमा खास
िेपालपुर
का.आ.4818(अ)दिनांक.10.10.2022
बेटमा
िेपालपुर
9.
का.आ.4000(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
काली जबल्लोि
िेपालपुर
10.
का.आ.4000(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
सनाविा
िेपालपुर
11.
का.आ.5394(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
का.आ.2278(अ)दिनांक.08.05.2023
मोथला
िेपालपुर
12.
का.आ.2278(अ)दिनांक.08.05.2023
सलमपुर
िेपालपुर
का.आ.5394(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
सलमपुर ििरी
िेपालपुर
1058
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
13.
का.आ.4000(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
का.आ.2278(अ)दिनांक.08.05.2023
करवासा
िेपालपुर
14.
का.आ.4000(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
का.आ.5394(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
का.आ.4818(अ)दिनांक.10.10.2022
का.आ.2278(अ)दिनांक.08.05.2023
झलाररया
िेपालपुर
15.
का.आ.4000(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
का.आ.2278(अ)दिनांक.09.05.2023
बिीपुरा
िेपालपुर
16.
का.आ.4002(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
का.आ.2278(अ)दिनांक.08.05.2023
डांसरी
िातोि
17.
का.आ.4002(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
कराजडया
िातोि
18.
का.आ.4818(अ)दिनांक.10.10.2022
पंत बड़ोदिया
िातोि
का.आ.4002(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
का.आ.2278(अ)दिनांक.08.05.2023
पंथ बड़ोदिया
िातोि
19.
का.आ.4002(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
मोिम्मिपुर उफच लौंजडया
िातोि
20.
का.आ.4002(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
का.आ.4818(अ)दिनांक.10.10.2022
वसंगाविा
िातोि
21.
का.आ.4002(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
का.आ.1439(अ)दिनांक.22.03.2022
का.आ.2278(अ)दिनांक.08.05.2023
बड़ी कलमेर
िातोि
22.
का.आ.4002(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
का.आ.1439(अ)दिनांक.22.03.2022
रोिड़ी
िातोि
23.
का.आ.4002(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
िातोि
िातोि
24.
का.आ.4002(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
का.आ.2278(अ)दिनांक.08.05.2023
सगवाल
िातोि
25.
का.आ.4002(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
खाखाखेड़ी
िातोि
26.
का.आ.4002(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
का.आ.4818(अ)दिनांक.10.10.2022
जपतावली
िातोि
का.आ.2278(अ)दिनांक.08.05.2023
जपतावाली
िातोि
27.
का.आ.4002(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
बघाना
िातोि
28.
का.आ.4002(अ)दिनांक.09.09.2021
सतलाना
िातोि
29.
का.आ.5398(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
का.आ.0823(अ)दिनांक.22.02.2022
मावलाखेडी
सांवेर
30.
का.आ.5398(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
मुरािपुरा
सांवेर
31.
का.आ.5398(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
सोलजसिा
सांवेर
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1059
32.
का.आ.5398(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
का.आ.2278(अ)दिनांक.08.05.2023
टोडी
सांवेर
33.
का.आ.5398(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
खाकरोड
सांवेर
34.
का.आ.5398(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
जर्मली (स्ट्पर लाईन)
सांवेर
35.
का.आ.5398(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
रामजपपल्या
सांवेर
36.
का.आ.5398(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
पानोड़ (स्ट्पर लाईन)
सांवेर
का.आ.4818(अ)दिनांक.10.10.2022
का.आ.2278(अ)दिनांक.08.05.2023
पानोि
सांवेर
37.
का.आ.5398(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
लसुजडया परमार
सांवेर
38.
का.आ.5398(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
मिारािगंि (स्ट्पर लाईन)
सांवेर
का.आ.2278(अ)दिनांक.08.05.2023
मिारािगंि
सांवेर
39.
का.आ.5398(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
का.आ.2278(अ)दिनांक.08.05.2023
पलाजसया
सांवेर
का.आ.4818(अ)दिनांक.10.10.2022
पलाजसया िागीर
सांवेर
40.
का.आ.5398(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
मणडलाविा
सांवेर
का.आ.2278(अ)दिनांक.08.05.2023
मंडलाविा
41.
का.आ.5398(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
किलाना (स्ट्पर लाईन)
सांवेर
42.
का.आ.5398(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
कुडाना (स्ट्पर लाईन)
सांवेर
43.
का.आ.5398(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
का.आ.2278(अ)दिनांक.08.05.2023
डकाच्या
सांवेर
44.
का.आ.5398(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
ििी कराजडया (स्ट्पर लाईन)
सांवेर
का.आ.2278(अ)दिनांक.08.05.2023
िर्िचकराजडया
सांवेर
45.
का.आ.5398(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
का.आ.2278(अ)दिनांक.08.05.2023
राहूखेड़ी
सांवेर
46.
का.आ.5398(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
िािणा (स्ट्पर लाईन)
सांवेर
47.
का.आ.5398(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
िेतपुरा
सांवेर
48.
का.आ.5398(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
मुंडला हुसैन
सांवेर
49.
का.आ.5398(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
मुंडला हुसैन (स्ट्पर लाईन)
सांवेर
50.
का.आ.5398(अ)दिनांक.20.12.2021
ब्राह्मण जपपल्या
सांवेर
जिला: िेवास राज्य : मध्य प्रिेि
1.
का.आ.4809(अ)दिनांक.30.12.2020
जमठ्ठुखेडी
सोनकच्छ
2.
का.आ.4809(अ)दिनांक.30.12.2020
बुिनगााँव
सोनकच्छ
3.
का.आ.4809(अ)दिनांक.30.12.2020
नानािाराखेडी
सोनकच्छ
4.
का.आ.4809(अ)दिनांक.30.12.2020
नौसराबाि
सोनकच्छ
1060
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
5.
का.आ.4809(अ)दिनांक.30.12.2020
बारोली
सोनकच्छ
का.आ.4820(अ)दिनांक.10.10.2022
बरोली
सोनकच्छ
6.
का.आ.4809(अ)दिनांक.30.12.2020
ओड़
सोनकच्छ
7.
का.आ.4809(अ)दिनांक.30.12.2020
ओड़नी
सोनकच्छ
8.
का.आ.4809(अ)दिनांक.30.12.2020
कोठड़ा
सोनकच्छ
9.
का.आ.4809(अ)दिनांक.30.12.2020
का.आ.4820(अ)दिनांक.10.10.2022
सोनकच्छ
सोनकच्छ
10.
का.आ.4809(अ)दिनांक.30.12.2020
िरमपुर
सोनकच्छ
11.
का.आ.4809(अ)दिनांक.30.12.2020
घटयाभाना
सोनकच्छ
12.
का.आ.4809(अ)दिनांक.30.12.2020
का.आ.2280(अ)दिनांक.08.05.2023
सोनकजच्छ
सोनकच्छ
13.
का.आ.4809(अ)दिनांक.30.12.2020
कराजडयागिा
सोनकच्छ
14.
का.आ.4809(अ)दिनांक.30.12.2020
जपलवानी
सोनकच्छ
15.
का.आ.4809(अ)दिनांक.30.12.2020
लालाखेड़ी
सोनकच्छ
16.
का.आ.4809(अ)दिनांक.30.12.2020
का.आ.4820(अ)दिनांक.10.10.2022
तालोंि
सोनकच्छ
17.
का.आ.4809(अ)दिनांक.30.12.2020
तालिी
सोनकच्छ
18.
का.आ.4809(अ)दिनांक.30.12.2020
छायनमेना
सोनकच्छ
का.आ.4820(अ)दिनांक.10.10.2022
छायानमैना
19.
का.आ.3548(अ)दिनांक.26.08.2021
मलेजण्डया
िेवास
20.
का.आ.3548(अ)दिनांक.26.08.2021
िलोदिया
िेवास
21.
का.आ.3548(अ)दिनांक.26.08.2021
का.आ.4820(अ)दिनांक.10.10.2022
खोकररया
िेवास
22.
का.आ.3548(अ)दिनांक.26.08.2021
बागड़िा
िेवास
23.
का.आ.3548(अ)दिनांक.26.08.2021
गुराजडया भील
िेवास
24.
का.आ.3548(अ)दिनांक.26.08.2021
सुल्पाखेड़ा
िेवास
25.
का.आ.3548(अ)दिनांक.26.08.2021
का.आ.4820(अ)दिनांक.10.10.2022
जसरोल्या
िेवास
26.
का.आ.3548(अ)दिनांक.26.08.2021
िामन्िा
िेवास
27.
का.आ.3548(अ)दिनांक.26.08.2021
में रखेड़ी अंकया
िेवास
28.
का.आ.3548(अ)दिनांक.26.08.2021
का.आ.4820(अ)दिनांक.10.10.2022
नापाखेड़ी
िेवास
29.
का.आ.3548(अ)दिनांक.26.08.2021
छापरी
िेवास
30.
का.आ.3548(अ)दिनांक.26.08.2021
जनवाजनया
िेवास
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1061
31.
का.आ.3548(अ)दिनांक.26.08.2021
कुमाररया
िेवास
32.
का.आ.3548(अ)दिनांक.26.08.2021
िमोजनया
िेवास
33.
का.आ.3548(अ)दिनांक.26.08.2021
का.आ.4820(अ)दिनांक.10.10.2022
रटगररया छोटा
िेवास
34.
का.आ.3548(अ)दिनांक.26.08.2021
भीमाखेडी
िेवास
35.
का.आ.3548(अ)दिनांक.26.08.2021
भड़ा जपपल्या
िेवास
[फाा. सं आर.- 11025(15)/5/2020-ओ-आर-I-भाग(2)/ई-45913)]
िजि िेखर वसंि, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 10th March, 2025
S.O. 384—Whereas, by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural
Gas. S. O. Numbers and Dates as mentioned in the Schedule below issued under Sub-section (i) of section 6 of
Petroleum and Minerals Pipeline (Acquisition of right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central
Government acquired the Right of User in the lands specified in the schedule appended to those notifications.
AND WHEREAS, in exercise of the powers conferred by the Sub-Section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act,
the Central Government vested the Right of user in the lands free from all encumbrances in the IHB Limited.
AND WHEREAS, the Competent Authority has made a report to the Central Government that the pipeline
has been laid for the purpose of transportation of LPG in the said lands and hence such operation may be terminated
for Kandla Gorakhpur LPG Pipeline Project in the state of Madhya Pradesh in respect of the said lands which in brief
are specified in the Schedule annexed to the Notification;
“Now, therefore, as required under explanation – 1 of rule 4 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines
(Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Rules 1963, the Central Government hereby declare the date on which this
notification is Right Published in the Gazette of India as the date of “Termination of Operation” in ROU Village
mentioned in Indore and Dewas district in the state of Madhya Pradesh.
SCHEDULE
District: INDORE State: Madhya Pradesh
S.No.
S.O. No. & Date
Name of Village
Name of Tehsil
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1.
S.O. No. 4000 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
Amli
Depalpur
2.
S.O. No. 4000 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
Rambadodiya
Depalpur
3.
S.O. No. 4000 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
Sejwani
Depalpur
4.
S.O. No. 4000 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
S.O. No. 5394 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
S.O. No. 4818 (E) Dated.10.10.2022
Dhureri
Depalpur
5.
S.O. No. 4000 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
Rampuria
Depalpur
S.O. No. 2278 (E) Dated.08.05.2023
Rampuriya
Depalpur
6.
S.O. No. 4000 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
Rolai
Depalpur
7.
S.O. No. 4000 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
Khatediya Sarang
Depalpur
8.
S.O. No. 4000 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
Betma Khaas
Depalpur
S.O. No. 4818 (E) Dated.10.10.2022
Betma
Depalpur
9.
S.O. No. 4000 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
Kali Billod
Depalpur
10.
S.O. No. 4000 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
Sanawda
Depalpur
11.
S.O. No. 5394 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
Mothala
Depalpur
S.O. No. 2278 (E) Dated.08.05.2023
Mothla
Depalpur
12.
S.O. No. 5394 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
Salampur Urban
Depalpur
1062
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
S.O. No. 2278 (E) Dated.08.05.2023
Salampur
Depalpur
13.
S.O. No. 4000 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
S.O. No. 2278 (E) Dated.08.05.2023
Karwasa
Depalpur
14.
S.O. No. 4000 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
S.O. No. 5394 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
Jhalariya
Depalpur
S.O. No. 4818 (E) Dated.10.10.2022
S.O. No. 2278 (E) Dated.08.05.2023
Jhalariya
Depalpur
15.
S.O. No. 4000 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
S.O. No. 2278 (E) Dated.08.05.2023
Badipura
Depalpur
16.
S.O. No.4002 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
S.O. No.2278 (E) Dated.08.05.2023
Dansari
Hatod
17.
S.O. No.4002 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
Karadiya
Hatod
18.
S.O. No.4818 (E) Dated.10.10.2022
Pant Badodiya
Hatod
S.O. No.4002 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
S.O. No.2278 (E) Dated.08.05.2023
Panth Badodiya
Hatod
19.
S.O. No.4002 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
Mohammadpur Urf
Londiya
Hatod
20.
S.O. No.4002 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
Singawda
Hatod
S.O. No.4818 (E) Dated.10.10.2022
Singawada
Hatod
21.
S.O. No.4002 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
S.O. No.1439 (E) Dated.22.03.2022
S.O. No.2278 (E) Dated.08.05.2023
Badi Kalmer
Hatod
22.
S.O. No.4002 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
S.O. No.1439 (E) Dated.22.03.2022
Rojdi
Hatod
23.
S.O. No.4002 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
Hatod
Hatod
24.
S.O. No.4002 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
S.O. No.2278 (E) Dated.08.05.2023
Sagwal
Hatod
25.
S.O. No.4002 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
Khakha Khedi
Hatod
26.
S.O. No.4002 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
S.O. No.4818 (E) Dated.10.10.2022
S.O. No.2278 (E) Dated.08.05.2023
Pitawali
Hatod
27.
S.O. No.4002 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
Baghana
Hatod
28.
S.O. No.4002 (E) Dated.09.09.2021
Satlana
Hatod
29.
S.O. No.5398 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
S.O. No.0823 (E) Dated.22.02.2022
Mawalakhedi
Sanwer
30.
S.O. No.5398 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
Muradpura
Sanwer
31.
S.O. No.5398 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
Solsinda
Sanwer
32.
S.O. No.5398 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
S.O. No.2278 (E) Dated.08.05.2023
Todi
Sanwer
33.
S.O. No.5398 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
Khakrod
Sanwer
34.
S.O. No.5398 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
Chimli (Spurline)
Sanwer
35.
S.O. No.5398 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
Rampipalya
Sanwer
36.
S.O. No.5398 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
Panod (Spurline)
Sanwer
S.O. No.4818 (E) Dated.10.10.2022
S.O. No.2278 (E) Dated.08.05.2023
Panod
Sanwer
37.
S.O. No.5398 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
Lasudiya Parmar
Sanwer
38.
S.O. No.5398 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
Maharajganj (Spurline)
Sanwer
S.O. No.2278 (E) Dated.08.05.2023
Maharajganj
Sanwer
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1063
39.
S.O. No.5398 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
Palasiya
Sanwer
S.O. No.4818 (E) Dated.10.10.2022
Palasiya Jagir
Sanwer
S.O. No.2278 (E) Dated.08.05.2023
Palasia
Sanwer
40.
S.O. No.5398 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
Mandlawada
Sanwer
S.O. No.2278 (E) Dated.08.05.2023
Mandlawda
Sanwer
41.
S.O. No.5398 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
Kajlana (Spurline)
Sanwer
42.
S.O. No.5398 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
Kudana (Spurline)
Sanwer
43.
S.O. No.5398 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
S.O. No.2278 (E) Dated.08.05.2023
Dakachya
Sanwer
44.
S.O. No.5398 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
Darji Karadiya
(Spurline)
Sanwer
S.O. No.2278 (E) Dated.08.05.2023
Darji Karadiya
Sanwer
45.
S.O. No.5398 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
S.O. No.2278 (E) Dated.08.05.2023
Rahukhedi
Sanwer
46.
S.O. No.5398 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
Shahna (Spurline)
Sanwer
47.
S.O. No.5398 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
Jetpura
Sanwer
48.
S.O. No.5398 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
Mundlahusain
Sanwer
49.
S.O. No.5398 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
Mundla Husain
(Spurline)
Sanwer
50.
S.O. No.5398 (E) Dated.20.12.2021
Brahman Pipalya
Sanwer
District: Dewas State: Madhya Pradesh
1.
S.O. No.4809 (E) Dated.30.12.2020
Mitthukhedi
Sonkatch
2.
S.O. No.4809 (E) Dated.30.12.2020
Budangaon
Sonkatch
3.
S.O. No.4809 (E) Dated.30.12.2020
Nanadharakhedi
Sonkatch
4.
S.O. No.4809 (E) Dated.30.12.2020
Nausarabad
Sonkatch
5.
S.O. No.4809 (E) Dated.30.12.2020
S.O. No.4820 (E) Dated.10.10.2022
Baroli
Sonkatch
6.
S.O. No.4809 (E) Dated.30.12.2020
Oad
Sonkatch
7.
S.O. No.4809 (E) Dated.30.12.2020
Odani
Sonkatch
8.
S.O. No.4809 (E) Dated.30.12.2020
Kothada
Sonkatch
9.
S.O. No.4809 (E) Dated.30.12.2020
S.O. No.4820 (E) Dated.10.10.2022
Sonkatch
Sonkatch
10.
S.O. No.4809 (E) Dated.30.12.2020
Dharampur
Sonkatch
11.
S.O. No.4809 (E) Dated.30.12.2020
Ghatiyabhana
Sonkatch
12.
S.O. No.4809 (E) Dated.30.12.2020
S.O. No.2280 (E) Dated.08.05.2023
Sonkatchi
Sonkatch
13.
S.O. No.4809 (E) Dated.30.12.2020
Karadiyagada
Sonkatch
14.
S.O. No.4809 (E) Dated.30.12.2020
Pilwani
Sonkatch
15.
S.O. No.4809 (E) Dated.30.12.2020
Lalakhedi
Sonkatch
16.
S.O. No.4809 (E) Dated.30.12.2020
S.O. No.4820 (E) Dated.10.10.2020
Talod
Sonkatch
17.
S.O. No.4809 (E) Dated.30.12.2020
Taldi
Sonkatch
18.
S.O. No.4809 (E) Dated.30.12.2020
S.O. No.4820 (E) Dated.10.10.2022
Chhayanmena
Sonkatch
19.
S.O. No.3548 (E) Dated.26.08.2021
Malendiya
Dewas
20.
S.O. No.3548 (E) Dated.26.08.2021
Jalodiya
Dewas
21.
S.O. No.3548 (E) Dated.26.08.2021
Khokariya
Dewas
S.O. No.4820 (E) Dated.10.10.2022
Khokhariya
Dewas
1064
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
22.
S.O. No.3548 (E) Dated.26.08.2021
Bagada
Dewas
23.
S.O. No.3548 (E) Dated.26.08.2021
Guradiya bhil
Dewas
24.
S.O. No.3548 (E) Dated.26.08.2021
Sulpakheda
Dewas
25.
S.O. No.3548 (E) Dated.26.08.2021
S.O. No.4820 (E) Dated.10.10.2022
Siroliya
Dewas
26.
S.O. No.3548 (E) Dated.26.08.2021
Dhamanda
Dewas
27.
S.O. No.3548 (E) Dated.26.08.2021
Merkhedi ankaya
Dewas
28.
S.O. No.3548 (E) Dated.26.08.2021
S.O. No.4820 (E) Dated.10.10.2022
Napakhedi
Dewas
29.
S.O. No.3548 (E) Dated.26.08.2021
Chhapri
Dewas
30.
S.O. No.3548 (E) Dated.26.08.2021
Niwaniya
Dewas
31.
S.O. No.3548 (E) Dated.26.08.2021
Kumariya
Dewas
32.
S.O. No.3548 (E) Dated.26.08.2021
Jamoniya
Dewas
33.
S.O. No.3548 (E) Dated.26.08.2021
Tigariya chhota
Dewas
S.O. No.4820 (E) Dated.10.10.2022
Chhota tigariya
Dewas
34.
S.O. No.3548 (E) Dated.26.08.2021
Bhimakhedi
Dewas
35.
S.O. No.3548 (E) Dated.26.08.2021
Bhandapipalya
Dewas
[F. No R- 11025(15)/5/2020-OR-I-Part(2)/E-45913)]
SHASHI SHEKHAR SINGH, Under Secy.
अंतररक्ष जवभाग
नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 385.—केंरीय सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम, 1976 के
जनयम 10 के उप-जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, एतत् द्वारा अंतररक्ष जवभाग के जनम् नजलजखत कायाचलय, जिसके 80 प्रजतित से
अजिक कमचर्ाररयों ने विंिी का कायचसािक ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जलया िै, को अजिसूजर्त करती िै।
क्षेत्रीय सुिूर संवेिन केंर (पूवच)
राष्ट्रीय सुिूर संवेिन केंर
अंतररक्ष जवभाग, भारत सरकार
बी.िी. 2; कायचक्षेत्र 1 बी., न्यू टाउन
कोलकाता - 700 163
[फाा. सं. 8/1/10/2024-ह िं.:]
रािी आर, अवर सजर्व
DEPARTMENT OF SPACE
New Delhi, the 5th March, 2025
S.O. 385—In pursuance of Sub-rule (4) of the Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official purposes
of the Union) Rule, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies the following Office of the Department of Space,
whereof more than 80 percent staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.
Regional Remote Sensing Centre (East)
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1065
National Remote Sensing Centre
Department of Space, Government of India
BG 2; Action Area-1B, New Town
Kolkata - 700 163
[F. No. 8/1/10/2024-H]
RAJI R, Under Secy.
मं
नई दिल्ली, 3 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 386.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (a1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj cSad
vkWQ bafM;k ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V औद्योजगक fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; tcyiqj ds iapkV (a10/2019) izdkf”kr djrh gSA
[la- ,y- 39025/01/2025- vkbZ vkj (ch-II)-04]
सलोनी, उप जनिेिक
New Delhi, the 3rd March, 2025
S.O. 386.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref.10/2019) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Bank of India and
their workmen.
[No. L-39025/01/2025-IR(B-II)-04]
SALONI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/RC/10/2019
Present: P.K.Srivastava
H.J.S..(Retd)
Dharmesh Malviya,
Transferred Constable,
Bank of India, Branch Dhatia (9123)
District Ujjain (M.P.),
Through General Secretary,
Daily Wage Bank Employees Organization,
Central Office, F-1, Tripti Vihar
Ujjain (M.P.) 456010
Workman
Vs
1. Regional Manager,
Bank of India,
Regional Office, Nagjhiri,
Ujjain (MP)
2. Branch Manager,
1066
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Bank of India,
Branch Dhatia (9123)
District Ujjain (MP)
Management
(JUDGMENT)
(Passed on this 16th day of January-2025)
The Workman Dharmesh Malviya has filed petition under Section 2-A (2&3) of the Industrial Dispute
Act, 1947 (in short the ‘Act’) against his termination with the case that, he was first appointed on Daily Wages by the
Branch Manager under his Oral Orders on 01.01.2014 as a Peon, and worked satisfactorily 8 hours daily till
28.02.2019, when his services were terminated by the Branch Manager without any notice or compensation.
According to the Workman, he was paid his wages in form of Vouchers not in his name but as a reimbursement to the
Branch Manager. He was called for interview with respect to his Regular Appointment by the Bank on 01.01.2019 but
was discriminated by Management and failed in the Interview. The action of Management in disengaging him without
notice of compensation is in violation of Section 25(F) and 25(G) of the Act, hence illegal. The petitioner has sought
the relief of his reinstatement and regularization as an appointment, setting-aside his termination with back-wages and
other benefits.
Case of Management is mainly that, the Petitioner was Daily Wager, who was called upon by Bank to
work for one or two hours for cleaning the Bank. He was not appointed against any Sanctioned Vacancy following
recruitment process. He never completed 244 days in any year. There was a scheme for regularization of services of
Daily Wagers who had worked for 240 days from the day of their first engagement till 07.05.2012. There was an
interview held and candidates were selected on the basis of the Interview. The selected Candidates were regularized.
The Workman cannot be selected, as he failed, hence he was not regularized.
In evidence, the Workman side has not filed any affidavit nor has proved any document.
Management has filed affidavit of its witness as his examination-in-chief, he has not been cross-examined
by Workman.
The Petitioner Workman did not appear for his stage of argument hence, argument of Learned Counsel
for Management Shri Neeraj Kewat were heard and record has been perused by me.
The reference itself is the issue for determination in the case in hand.
The initial burden to prove his case is on the petitioner. He has not filed any evidences in support of his
pleadings. Hence, has failed to discharge his burden to prove that he had worked continuously for 240 days in a year
including the year preceding the date of his disengagement. Hence, holding the case of the petitioner Workman not
proved, the petition deserves to be dismissed.
ORDER
Petition Dismissed.
No order as to cost.
DATE:- 16/01/2025
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 387.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्रीय
सरकार लाइफ इन्सुरेंस कारपोरेिन ऑफ़ इंजडया के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री गिानन गतलेवार, भारतीय
मज़िूर संघ के बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, नागपुर, पंर्ाट (ररफरेन्स
न.- 25/2021-22) को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै, प्रकाजित करती िै िो केन्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के
साथ 05.03.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-17011/04/2022-आईआर(एम)]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1067
New Delhi, the 5th March, 2025
S.O. 387.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Reference No. 25/2021-22) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal cum Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to Life Insurance Corporation of India and Shri Gajanan Gatlewar, Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh which
was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 05.03.2025.
[No. L-17011/04/2022-IR(M)]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI SHIV SHANKER PRASAD PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR
COURT, NAGPUR
Case No.CGIT/NGP/25/2021-22
Date: 31.01.2025.
Party No.1:
The Senior Divisional Manager,
M/s Life Insurance Corporation of India,
Divisional Office – National Insurance Building,
S.V. Patel Marg, Sadar, Nagpur - 440001
V/s.
Party No.2:
Sh. Gajanan Gatalewar, W Secretary &
District Head Bhartiya Mazdoor Sangh,
Behind Apna Bazar, Temple Road,
Sitabuldi, Nagpur – 440032.
AWARD
(Dated: 31st January, 2025)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial
dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of Life Insurance Corporation of India, Divisional
Office, Nagpur and their 42 Daily wage workers for adjudication, as per letter No. L-17011/04/2022 (IR(M)) dated
22.02.2022, with the following schedule:-
“Whether the action of the management of Life Insurance Corporation of India, Divisional Office,
Nagpur in not reinstating the services of 42 Daily wage workers through contractor and not paying
wages to 42 daily wage workers is just, fair & legal? If not, what relief the workers are entitled to?”
2.
Case called out. Learned Counsel for the respondent is only present. None is present on behalf of the
petitioner since very beginning. No statement of claim has been filed by the petitioner and no other evidence is
adduced by the petitioner. No written statement has been filed till date.
3.
As the petitioner is not coming since long shows that petitioner is not interested to contest the case and do
not want to proceed with the reference, so it is closed.
The case of the petitioner is not proved.
Hence, it is ordered:
ORDER
The action of the management of Life Insurance Corporation of India, Divisional Office, Nagpur in
not reinstating the services of 42 Daily wage workers through contractor and not paying wages to 42 daily
wage workers is just, fair & legal. The workmen are not entitled to any relief.
Justice (Retd.) SHIV SHANKER PRASAD, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 388.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्रीय सरकार टाटा
एआईिी लाइफ इन्सुरेंस कंपनी जलजमटेड के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री जवनय रामिास इमले के बीर् अनुबंि में
1068
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
जनर्िचष्ट केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, नागपुर, पंर्ाट (ररफरेन्स न.- 37/2013-14) को िैसा
दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै, प्रकाजित करती िै िो केन्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 05.03.2025 को प्राप्त
हुआ था l
[सं. एल-17012/10/2013-आईआर(एम)]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 5th March, 2025
S.O. 388.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Reference No. 37/2013-14) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal cum Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to Tata AIG Life Insurance Company Limited and Shri Vinay Ramdas Imle which was received along
with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 05.03.2025.
[No. L-17012/10/2013-IR(M)]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI SHIV SHANKER PRASAD PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR
COURT, NAGPUR
Case No.CGIT/NGP/37/2013-14
Date: 11.02.2025.
Party No.1:
1) The Managing Director,
Tata AIG Life Insurance Co. Ltd.,
Delphi, B-Wing, 2nd Floor, Orchard
Avenue, Powai, Mumbai – 400076.
2) The Branch Manager,
Tata AIG Lilfe Insurance Co. Ltd.,
1st Floor, Chandak Towers, Near
Girl’s High School Square, Camp
Road, Amravati-444602.
V/s
Party No.2:
Sh. Vinay Ramdas Imle,
Vijay Nagar, Nr. Smt. Pratibhatai
Patil’s residence, Congress Nagar,
Camp, Amravati – 444602
AWARD
(Dated: 11th February, 2025)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial
dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of TATA AIG Life Insurance Company Ltd. Mumbai
and their workman, Shri Vinay Ramdas Imle, for adjudication, as per letter No.L-17012/10/2013 (IR(M)) dated
18.06.2013, with the following schedule:-
“Whether the action of the management of TATA AIG Life Insurance Company Ltd., Mumbai
through its Managing Director in terminating the service of Sh. Vinay Ramdas Imple w.e.f. 07/06/2012
without following the mandatory provision of Section 25-F of the ID Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If
not, to what relief the workman is entitled to?”
2. Case is called out. Both the parties are absent. Both the parties are not responding and attending the Court
since 30.08.2019 i.e. near about 5 years. Although the statement of claim and written statement have been filed by the
parties. Petitioner has also filed affidavit as examination in chief. But petitioner and his counsel have not come to
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1069
contest the case and have also not adduced such evidence by which contents of the statement of claim may be proved.
Petitioner is not attending the Court since long back. Meaning thereby he is not interested to contest the case.
Contention of the petitioner is not proved so it is closed.
Hence, it is ordered:
ORDER
The action of the management of TATA AIG Life Insurance Company Ltd., Mumbai through its
Managing Director in terminating the service of Sh. Vinay Ramdas Imple w.e.f. 07/06/2012 without following
the mandatory provision of Section 25-F of the ID Act, 1947 is legal and justified. The workman is not entitled
to any relief.
Justice (Retd.) SHIV SHANKER PRASAD, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 389.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्रीय
सरकार मेससच लाइफ इन्सुरेंस कॉपोरेिन ऑफ़ इंजडया के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्रीमती वंिना िगिीि र्ौिरी
के बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, नागपुर, पंर्ाट (ररफरेन्स न.-
39/2018-19) को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै, प्रकाजित करती िै िो केन्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ
05.03.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-17012/6/2018-आईआर(एम)]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 5th March, 2025
S.O. 389.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Reference No. 39/2018-19) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal cum Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to M/s Life Insurance Corporation of India and Smt. Vandana Jagdish Choudhary which was received
along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 05.03.2025.
[No. L-17012/6/2018-IR(M)]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI SHIV SHANKER PRASAD PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR
COURT, NAGPUR
Case No.CGIT/NGP/39/2018-19
Date: 13.02.2025.
Party No. 1:
1) The Branch Manager,
M/s Life Insurance Corporation of India,
Office : Umred, Tah. Umred,
District – Nagpur – 441203.
2) The Divisional Branch Manager,
M/s Life Insurance Corporation of India,
Divisional Office, Kasturchand Park,
S.V. Patel Marg, Nagpur – 440001.
V/s
Party No. 2:
Smt. Vandana Jagdish Choudhary,
R/o Near Om Niketan College, Vaishnavi Umred
Tah. Umred, District-Nagpur-441203.
1070
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AWARD
(Dated: 4th February, 2025)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial
dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of Life Insurance Corporation of India, Umred, Tah.
Umred, Distt. Nagpur and their workman, Smt. Vandana Jagdish Choudhary, for adjudication, as per letter
No. L-17012/6/2018-(IR(M)) dated 25.10.2018, with the following schedule:-
“Whether Smt. Vandana Jagdish Choudhary allegedly working as Peon (as claimed by her) in Life
Insurance Corporation of India, Umred, Tah. Umred, Distt. Nagpur ‘workman’ under ID Act, 1947?
If yes, whether the action of the management of Life Insurance Corporation of India, Umred, Tah. Umred,
Distt. Nagpur through Branch Manager and Life Insurance Corporation of India, Divisional Office :
Kasturchand Park S.V. Patel Marg, Nagpur through its Divisional Branch Manager in terminating the
services of Smt. Vandana Jagdish Choudhary w.e.f. 11.11.2013 is just, fair & legal? If not, to what reliefs the
workman is entitled to?”
2. Case is called out. Learned Counsel for the management Shri. N.K.Ghagarkar is present before the Court.
None is present on behalf of the petitioner. Petitioner is not responding and attending the Court since 30.11.2021.
Although statement of claim and written statement have been filed by the parties but petitioner has not filed rejoinder
affidavit till date and no evidence has been filed by him to prove his claim. Therefore, claim of the petitioner is not
proved. So it is closed.
Hence, it is ordered:
ORDER
The action of the management of Life Insurance Corporation of India, Umred, Tah. Umred, Distt.
Nagpur through Branch Manager and Life Insurance Corporation of India, Divisional Office : Kasturchand
Park S.V. Patel Marg, Nagpur through its Divisional Branch Manager in terminating the services of Smt.
Vandana Jagdish Choudhary w.e.f. 11.11.2013 is just, fair & legal. The workman is not entitled to any relief.
Justice (Retd.) SHIV SHANKER PRASAD, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 390.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्रीय
सरकार मेससच लाइफ इन्सुरेंस कॉपोरेिन ऑफ़ इंजडया के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्रीमती िुभांगी श्रीकांत थेरे के
बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, नागपुर, पंर्ाट (ररफरेन्स न.- 65/2018-
19) को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै, प्रकाजित करती िै िो केन्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ
05.03.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-17012/05/2018-आईआर(एम)]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 5th March, 2025
S.O. 390.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Reference No. 65/2018-19) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal cum Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in
relation to M/s Life Insurance Corporation of India and Smt. Shubhangi Srikanth There which was received
along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 05.03.2025.
[No. L-17012/05/2018-IR(M)]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI SHIV SHANKER PRASAD PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR
COURT, NAGPUR
Case No.CGIT/NGP/65/2018-19
Date: 13.02.2025.
Party No. 1:
1) The Zonal Manager,
M/s Life Insurance Corporation of India,
Central Office : Yogakshema, Jeewan Bima Marg,
Post Box No. 11709, Mumbai – 400001.
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1071
2) The Sr. Divisional Manager,
M/s Life Insurance Corporation of India,
Jeevvan Prakash, Divisional Office,
Near Duffrin Hospital, Srikrushnapeth,
Amravati – 444601.
3) The Branch Manager,
M/s Life Insurance Corporation of India,
Branch Office : Moghe Complex, Approach Road,
Warud, Distt. Amravati – 444805.
V/s.
Party No. 2:
Mrs. Shubhangi Shrikant There,
R/o Behind Kathiwale Complex,
Warud, Distt – Amravati - 444906
AWARD
(Dated: 13th February, 2025)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial
dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of Life Insurance Corporation of India, Mumbai (Zonal
Office, LIC of India, Divisional Office Amravati & LIC of India, Warud Branch, Distt. Amravati and their workman,
Mrs. Shubhangi Shrikant There for adjudication, as per letter No. L-17012/05/2018-IR(M) dated 30.11.2018, with
the following schedule:-
“Whether the action of the respondent management i.e. Life Insurance Corporation of India, Mumbai
(Zonal Office), L.I.C. of India, Divisional Office Amravati & L.I.C. of India, Warud Branch, District –
Amravati in terminating the services of Mrs. Shubhangi Shrikant There with effect from 16.08.2016 is
just fair and legal? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to?”
2.
Case called out. Learned Counsel for the respondent Shri N.K.Ghagarkar is present before the Court but
none is responding on behalf of the petitioner. Petitioner is not responding and attending the Court since 18.10.2019.
No statement of claim has been filed by the petitioner till date. Respondent has filed an application today for dismissal
of the case on the ground that petitioner is not inclined to contest the case and did not have filed his statement of
claim till date. Petitioner has not filed any evidence to prove his claim.
Case of the petitioner is not proved so it is closed.
Hence, it is ordered:
ORDER
The action of the respondent management i.e. Life Insurance Corporation of India, Mumbai (Zonal
Office), L.I.C. of India, Divisional Office Amravati & L.I.C. of India, Warud Branch, District – Amravati in
terminating the services of Mrs. Shubhangi Shrikant There with effect from 16.08.2016 is just fair and legal.
The workman is not entitled to any relief.
Justice (Retd.) SHIV SHANKER PRASAD, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 391.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्रीय सरकार
मैंगनीि ओरे इंजडया जलजमटेड के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और मैंगनीि ओरे इंजडया जलजमटेड कामगार संघटन (इंटक) के
बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, नागपुर, पंर्ाट (ररफरेन्स न.- 44/2014)
को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै, प्रकाजित करती िै िो केन्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 05.03.2025 को
प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-27011/06/2014-आईआर(एम)]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
1072
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 5th March, 2025
S.O. 391.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Reference No. 44/2014) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal
cum Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to
Manganese Ore India Limited and Manganese Ore India Limited Workers Union (INTUC) which was received
along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 05.03.2025.
[No. L-27011/06/2014-IR(M)]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI SHIV SHANKER PRASAD PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR
COURT, NAGPUR
Case No.CGIT/NGP/44/2014
Date: 17.02.2025.
Party No.1:
1) The Chairman-cum-Managing Director
(Tech), Manganese Ore (I) Ltd.,
MOIL Bhawan, 1-A, Katol Road,
Nagpur-440013.
2) The Chief (Mines), Baldongri Manganese
Mines of MOIL Ltd, PO-Satak,
T.q. Parseoni, Distt. Nagpur (MS)-441106.
V/s
Party No.2:
The Secretary General, MOIL kamgar
Sanghatan (INTUC), MOIL Ltd, MOIL
Bhawan, katol Road, Nagpur-440013.
AWARD
(Dated: 17th February, 2025)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial
dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of Manganese Ore (I) Ltd and their workman, Shri.
Mahadeo Bhaddu Patil for adjudication, as per letter No.L-27011/6/2014 (IR(M)) dated 03.11.2014, with the
following schedule:-
“Whether the demand of the workman Sh. Mahadeo Bhaddu Patil, Mine mate of Beldongri Mangnese
Mines of the MOIL Ltd. for the change/amendment in the date of birth in his service record from 1.7.1955 &
15.09.1961 to 15.09.1961 is legal, proper and justified, if so, to what relief the workman is entitled and what
other directions are necessary in the matter.?”
2. Case is called out. Both the parties are absent. Petitioner is not responding and attending the Court since
17/04/2020. Although statement of claim and written statement have been filed by the parties. Petitioner has also filed
his affidavit but petitioner has not proved the contents of his affidavit as well as the contents of the claim petition. No
other evidence has been filed by the petitioner to prove his case. Claim of the petitioner is not proved so it is closed.
Hence, it is ordered:
ORDER
The demand of the workman Sh. Mahadeo Bhaddu Patil, Mine mate of Beldongri Mangnese Mines of
the MOIL Ltd. for the change/amendment in the date of birth in his service record from 1.7.1955 & 15.09.1961
to 15.09.1961 is illegal, improper and unjustified. The workman is not entitled to any relief.
Justice (Retd.) SHIV SHANKER PRASAD, Presiding Officer
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1073
नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 392.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्रीय
सरकार मैंगनीि ओरे इंजडया जलजमटेड के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और मैंगनीि ओरे इंजडया जलजमटेड कामगार संघटन
(इंटक) के बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, नागपुर, पंर्ाट (ररफरेन्स
न.- 45/2014) को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै, प्रकाजित करती िै िो केन्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ
05.03.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-27011/07/2014-आईआर(एम)]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 5th March, 2025
S.O. 392.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Reference No. 45/2014) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal
cum Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to
Manganese Ore India Limited and Manganese Ore India Limited Workers Union (INTUC) which was received
along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 05.03.2025.
[No. L-27011/07/2014-IR(M)]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI SHIV SHANKER PRASAD PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR
COURT, NAGPUR
Case No.CGIT/NGP/45/2014
Date: 17.02.2025.
Party No. 1:
1) The Chairman-cum-Managing Director
(Tech), Manganese Ore (I) Ltd.,
MOIL Bhawan, 1-A, Katol Road,
Nagpur-440013.
2) The Chief (Mines), Kandri Manganese
Mines of MOIL Ltd, PO-Kandri,
T.q. Ramtek, Distt. Nagpur (MS)-441106.
V/s
Party No. 2:
The Secretary General, MOIL kamgar
Sanghatan (INTUC), MOIL Ltd, MOIL
Bhawan, katol Road, Nagpur-440013.
AWARD
(Dated: 17th February, 2025)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial
dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of Manganese Ore (I) Ltd and their workman, Shri.
Janardhan Piprode for adjudication, as per letter No.L-27011/7/2014 (IR(M)) dated 03.11.2014, with the following
schedule:-
“Whether the demand of the workman Shri. Janardhan Piprode, Timberman of Khandri Mangnese
Mines of the MOIL Ltd. for the change/amendment in the date of birth in his service record from
1.7.1954 to 02.07.1956 is legal, proper and justified, if so, to what relief the workman is entitled and
what other directions are necessary in the matter?”
1074
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2. Case is called out. Both the parties are absent. Petitioner is not responding and attending the Court since
17/04/2020. Although statement of claim and written statement have been filed by the parties. Petitioner has also filed
his affidavit but petitioner has not proved the contents of his affidavit as well as the contents of the claim petition. No
other evidence has been filed by the petitioner to prove his case. Claim of the petitioner is not proved so it is closed.
Hence, it is ordered:
ORDER
The demand of the workman Shri. Janardhan Piprode, Timberman of Khandri Mangnese Mines of
the MOIL Ltd. for the change/amendment in the date of birth in his service record from 1.7.1954 to 02.07.1956
is illegal, improper and unjustified. The workman is not entitled to any relief.
Justice (Retd.) SHIV SHANKER PRASAD, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 393.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्रीय
सरकार मैंगनीि ओरे इंजडया जलजमटेड के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और मैंगनीि ओरे इंजडया जलजमटेड कामगार संघटन
(इंटक) के बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, नागपुर, पंर्ाट (ररफरेन्स
न.- 40/2014) को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै, प्रकाजित करती िै िो केन्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ
05.03.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-27011/02/2014-आईआर(एम)]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 5th March, 2025
S.O. 393.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Reference No. 40/2014) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal
cum Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to
Manganese Ore India Limited and Manganese Ore India Limited Workers Union (INTUC) which was received
along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 05.03.2025.
[No. L-27011/02/2014-IR(M)]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI SHIV SHANKER PRASAD PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR
COURT, NAGPUR
Case No.CGIT/NGP/40/2014
Date: 17.02.2025.
Party No.1:
1) The Chairman-cum-Managing Director
(Tech), Manganese Ore (I) Ltd.,
MOIL Bhawan, 1-A, Katol Road,
Nagpur-440013.
2) The Chief (Mines), Munsar Manganese
Mines of MOIL Ltd, PO-Khairi Bijewade,
Tq. Ramtek, Distt. Nagpur-441106.
V/s
Party No.2:
The Secretary General, MOIL kamgar
Sanghatan (INTUC), MOIL Ltd, MOIL
Bhawan, katol Road, Nagpur-440013.
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1075
AWARD
(Dated: 17th February, 2025)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial
dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of Manganese Ore (I) Ltd and their workman, Shri.
Ankush Namdeo, for adjudication, as per letter No.L-27011/2/2014 (IR(M)) dated 31.10.2014, with the following
schedule:-
“Whether the demand of the workman Shri. Ankush Namdeo, Fieldman of Munsar Mangnese Mine of
the MOIL Ltd. for the change/amendment in the date of birth in his service record from 1956 to 26.01.1958 is
legal, proper and justified, if so, to what relief the workman is entitled and what other directions are necessary
in the matter?”
2. Case is called out. Both the parties are absent. Petitioner is not responding and attending the Court since
17/04/2020. Although statement of claim and written statement has been filed by the parties. Petitioner has also filed
his affidavit but petitioner has not proved the contents of his affidavit as well as the contents of the claim petition. No
other evidence has been filed by the petitioner to prove his case. Claim of the petitioner is not proved so it is closed.
Hence, it is ordered:
ORDER
The demand of the workman Shri. Ankush Namdeo, Fieldman of Munsar Mangnese Mine of the
MOIL Ltd. for the change/amendment in the date of birth in his service record from 1956 to 26.01.1958 is
illegal, improper and unjustified. The workman is not entitled to any relief.
Justice (Retd.) SHIV SHANKER PRASAD, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 394.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,केन्रीय
सरकार प्रार्ायच, िवािर नवोिय जवद्यालय, कालूखेड़ा, रतलाम (म.प्र.), प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्रीमती िीला
बाई, कामगार,के बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण- सि- श्रम न्यायालय, िबलपुर पंर्ाट
(संिभच संख्या आईडी नंबर सीिीआईटी/एलसी/आर/34/2011, को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै,प्रकाजित करती
िै िो केन्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 27.02.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-42012/277/2010-आईआर(डीयू)]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 6th March, 2025
S.O. 394.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. ID.No. CGIT/LC/R/34/2011), of the Central Government
Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the
employers in relation to The Principal, Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Kalukheda, Ratlam (M.P.), and Smt.
Sheila Bai, Worker, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 27.02.2025,
[No. L-42012/277/2010-IR(DU)]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/34/2011
Present: P.K.Srivastava
H.J.S..( Retd)
Smt. Sheila Bai
W/o. Bhanwari Lal
R/o. Dudh Dairy, Kalukheda
Ratlam (M.P.)
Workman
1076
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Versus
The Principal
Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya
Kalukheda, Ratlam (M.P.)
Management
AWARD
(Passed on this 01st day of January-2025.)
As per letter dated 26/04/2011 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is made to
this Tribunal under section-10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per reference number L-42012/277/2010/IR(DU) dt. 26/04/2011.
The dispute under reference related to :-
“Whether the action of the management of Navodayaa Vidyalayaa, Ratlam in terminating the services of
Smt. Sheila Bai W/o. Shri Banwarilal, Mess Helper w.e.f. December 2006 by oral order is legal and justified ?
What relief the workman is entitled to ?”
After registering the case on the basis of the reference, notices were sent to the parties and were duly served
on them. They appeared and filed their respective statements of claim and defense.
The case of the workman, in short, is that she was appointed as a Mess Helper in the Jawahar Navodaya
Vidyalaya on 15.04.1994, at monthly wages of Rs. 300/- per month. She worked continuously till 12.12.2006, when
her services were terminated by management without notice or compensation. She was given information in RTI Act
that, post of Mess Helper was vacant in the Vidyalaya since 1994, this post remained vacant till 2001. Even then she
was not regularized, though she had the qualification required for the post which is Class-V pass and was registered
with the employment exchange. The Officers of management unlawfully and arbitrarily converted the post of Mess
Helper from Schedule Cast to the General in the rotation and appointed one Bhanwar Singh was from General
Category which is against law. This Bhanwar Singh was first engaged on contract basis and was regularized on
31.07.2001 only after one year of service as a contract labour.
The workman has thus prayed that, holding the action of management in terminating her services against law
and also by holding the appointment of Bhanwar Singh on the post of Mess Helper by way of changing the roster
illegally against law and she be held entitled to be reinstated and to be appointed on regular basis with all back wages
and pre as well post retiral benefits.
The case of the management, inter alia, is that the alleged workman was firstly, in light of notification
dated 17.12.1998 issued by the Government of India u/s. 14(2) of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act 1985, the
Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti which is all over incharge with respect to matter relating to management and
appointment of teaching and non-teaching staff has been notified, hence in view of this notification this Tribunal does
not have jurisdiction to hear the case and secondly, the workman was engaged as a casual worker in the Vidyalaya
Mess from 01.08.1996 to 12.12.2006 with intermittent breaks in between. She was not engaged based on any
selection process or against sanctioned post her services were discontinued on 12.12.2006 by Competent Authority.
Management has admitted that post of Mess Helper was vacant since 1996 to 2001. Under process of recruitment to
the post of Mess Helper under category unreserved was made and Bhanwar Singh was appointed on 01.08.2001 by
selection committee following recruitment process. The workman was neither sponsored by employment exchange
nor did she apply in response to recruitment notice. Management also admits the roster for the post of Mess Helper as
OBC was exchanged with unreserved allotted to Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Damoh by Competent Authority as per
administrative requirement and was displayed on the notice board as per rules. Management has thus requested that
the reference be answered against the workman.
In evidence, the workman has filed her affidavit as her examination in chief. She has been cross examined
by management. She has filed and proved photocopy documents which are Ex. W/1 her marksheet of 1996, W/2
Employment Exchange Registration of 12.07.1999, RTI information regarding vacancies of Cook and Mess Helper,
as well her attendance sheet August 01st, 1996 to December 12th, 2006, changed roster as on 15.06.2004 showing the
one post of Mess Helper in unreserved category, allotment of roster points dated 08.03.2001 showing that the reserve
post of OBC Mess Helper has been made unreserved category, Ex. W/4 is the letter of management dated 20.03.2001,
Ex. W/5 is the list of applicants who applied for regular appointment, she has filed and proved other RTI documents
also which are mainly the documents referred as above, marked as Ex. W/7 to W/ 21, to be referred to as and when
required. Management has filed affidavit of its principal has not been cross examined. Management has also filed
documents, to be referred to as and when required.
I have heard arguments of Learned Counsel Shri R.K. Soni for workman and learned Counsel Shri Vijay
Tripathi. I have gone through the record as well.
Regarding the first submission and plea by management that, this dispute is not cognizable by this Tribunal,
in the light of notification issued u/s. 14 of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act 1985, Section 28 of the same Act
requires to be referred here, which is being reproduced as follows :-
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1077
“28. Exclusion of jurisdiction of Courts except the Supreme Court under Article 136 of the
Constitution.—
On and from the date from which any jurisdiction, powers and authority becomes exercisable under
this Act by a Tribunal in relation to recruitment and matters concerning recruitment to any Service or
post or service matters concerning members of any Service or persons appointed to any Service or
post, no court except—
(a) the Supreme Court; or
(b) any Industrial Tribunal, Labour Court or other authority constituted under the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) or any other corresponding law for the time being in force, shall have, or be
entitled to exercise any jurisdiction, powers or authority in relation to such recruitment or matters
concerning such recruitment or such service matters.”
From perusal of record in the light of rival arguments, it comes out that though the workman has claimed that
she was appointed as a daily wager on 15.04.1994, management admits her engagement as daily wager since
01.08.1996. Case of the workman is that, she worked regularly and continuously till date of disengagement, which is
undisputedly 12.12.2006.
In the light of this provision, the argument from the side of management regarding maintainability of
the case cannot be accepted and the dispute in the reference is held cognizable by this Tribunal.
In her statement on oath, the workman has corroborated her case that, she worked continuously till
12.12.2006 whereas the case of the management is that, she was engaged on intermittent basis as and when required.
Management has provided an RTI document showing the number of days she worked in every year and has filed this
documents also from their side, the basis of on which this document was prepared has not been disclosed. In a case,
where engagement is not disputed and what is disputed that whether the workman worked continuously for 240 days
in a year as defined u/s. 25-B of the Act, and the workman states on oath that, she worked continuously for 240 days
in every year, the management which has documents relating to attendance as well payment has the onus to dispel this
allegation from the side of workman by way of producing the documents which it has under its possession and
control. The management could not discharge this onus only by way of producing a list of working days per year in
the name of attendance register. Admittedly, the workman was a Mess Helper. Mess in a school runs in the whole
academic session without any gap. It is not the case of any of the parties that, there was another Mess Helper also
appointed by management in any capacity rather it is established that, the workman was the only Mess Helper during
these years.
Hence, case of the workman that, she worked 240 days in every year is held proved.
Since, it is the case of workman that she was issued no notice nor was given any compensation on her
disengagement, which has not been rebutted by management, hence her disengagement is held in violation of Section
25-F and 25-G of the Act.
In the light of fact that, the disengagement of the workman has been held against law, the question
arises as to what relief the workman is entitled to ?
It is evident on record that, the workman had put in about atleast 10 years as a casual employee with the
management. This is also evident from the RTI document that since 1994 to 1996 there was one post sanctioned for
Mess Helper. In 1999 there were two posts, one for Schedule Caste and other for Schedule Tribe. In the year 2000,
the roster changed and there remained to two posts of Mess Helper one from Schedule Caste and one OBC. In the
year 2001, there were two posts of Mess Helpers, one for Schedule Caste and one Unreserved. It is not disputed that
the workman is member of Schedule Caste community. The posts as mentioned above have been shown in the roster,
copy issued by management in RTI which have been filed by the workman. Ex. W/3 which is the information given
by management in RTI also states that there were two posts sanctioned for Mess Helper, one vacant since 1991-92
and the second vacant since 1997-98. The first vacancy was filled on 01.07.1995 which subsequently became vacant
on 17.08.1996. Thereafter, according to the information furnished Ex. W/3 this post was filled on contract basis on
01.08.2001, which was made permanent vide order dated 19.10.2004. And the second post of Mess Helper was filled
on 13.12.2005 by way of internal transfer. Also it comes out that, the one post of Schedule Caste was transferred to
Damoh and unreserved vacancy was transferred from other place to the Vidyalaya at Ratlam. It has been submitted by
management learned Counsel that, the management is within its rights to change the roster. No doubt, the change of
roster is within the powers of employer/department, but it should be exercised in good faith.
In the case in hand, the workman was working on a post reserved for Schedule Caste on contract basis as a
daily wager, she was not regularized for almost 7 years. Reference of Section 2(ra) of the Act requires to be taken
here which defines unfair labour practice. The Clause 10 of 5th Schedule to the Act is being reproduced as follows :-
1078
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
“To employ workmen as Badlis, Casuals or Temporaries and to continue them as such for years, with the
object of depriving them of status and privileges of permanent workmen.”
Hence, in the light of the facts mentioned above, the management has undoubtedly adopted unfair labour
practice by way of engaging the Schedule Caste workman as casual Mess Helper and continued her as such for
years and years and not making appointment till 2001 on the post of Mess Helper reserved for Schedule Caste.
Had the management initiated recruitment process to fill the vacancy of Mess Helper reserved for Schedule Castes
in time, before it was substituted by General Vacancy in the roster in 2001, the workman, being a member of
Schedule Caste community would have been in better position for her consideration of her appointment on
permanent basis.
Section 25-T of the Act Prohibits Adoption of Unfair Labour Practice.
In the lights of the above discussion, the action of management in changing the roster by way of transferring
the Schedule Caste vacancy of Mess Helper from Ratlam and bringing in unreserved vacancy there cannot be said to
be in good faith, rather facts indicate that, this change of roster in 2001 was done only to accommodate Bhanwar
Singh.
Keeping in view the fact that, Bhanwar Singh has been appointed on the unreserved vacancy of Mess Helper
on the basis of changed roster and also the fact that, by now the workman has reached age of her superannuation, her
reinstatement will not be proper. On the facts mentioned above, the workman is held entitled to a lump sum
compensation in lieu of all his claims, which is computed at Rs. 10,00,000/- payable by management from the date of
her disengagement with interest @ of 6% p.a. till its payment.
In the light of above discussion and findings, the reference is answered as follows :-
AWARD
The action of management of Navodaya Vidyalaya, Ratlam in terminating the services of Smt. Sheila
Bai W/o. Shri Banwari Lal, Mess Helper w.e.f. December 2006 by oral order is held illegal and unjustified, the
workman is held entitled to a lump sum compensation in lieu of all his claims, which is computed at Rs.
10,00,000/- payable by management from the date of her disengagement with interest @ of 6% p.a. till its
payment within 90 days from the date of Award.
No order as to cost.
DATE: 01/01/2025
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 395.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,केन्रीय
सरकार मेससच बी पी जवश्वकमाच, बीएसएनएल ठेकेिार, गुलौवा र्ौक, गढ़ा, िबलपुर, प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री
जििुपाल पाण्डेय, कामगार,के बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण- सि- श्रम न्यायालय, िबलपुर
पंर्ाट(संिभच संख्या आईडी नंबर सीिीआईटी/एलसी/आर/25/2016, को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै,प्रकाजित
करती िै िो केन्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 27.02.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-40012/53/2015-आईआर(डीयू)]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 6th March, 2025
S.O. 395.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. ID.No. CGIT/LC/R/25/2016), of the Central Government
Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the
employers in relation to M/s B P Viswakarma, BSNL Contractor, Gulauva Chowk, Garha, Jabalpur, and
Shri Shishupal Pandey, Worker, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government
on 27.02.2025,
[No. L-40012/53/2015-IR(DU)]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1079
ANNEXURE
THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/25/2016
Present: P.K.Srivastava
H.J.S..(Retd)
Shri Shishupal Pandey,
S/o Shri Bijay Shankar Pandey,
Vill. - Barha, PO- Katki, Teh – Sirmour,
Rewa (M.P.)- 486448
Workman
Vs
M/s B P Viswakarma,
BSNL Contractor,
M/s B P Viwakarma,
H. No. 592/11, Gautam Building,
Gulauva Chowk, Garha
Jabalpur - 482001
Management
(JUDGMENT)
(Passed on this 23th day of January-2025)
As per letter dated 17/02/2016 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
made to this Tribunal under Section-10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the ‘Act’)as per Notification
No. L-40012/53/2015-IR(DU) dt. 17/02/2016. The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the termination or removal from service of Shri Shishupal Pandey, Ex- Electrician
w.e.f. 04.09.2014 from the post of Electrician by the management of M/s B P Viswakarma, BSNL Contractor, Rewa
(MP) is legal and justified? If not to what relief he is entitled to?”
Case of the Workman, as taken by him in his statement of claim is mainly that he was working since 1997,
on contract basis under Contractor M/s B P Viswakarma at the site of BSNL under the direction of the Executive
Engineer of the BSNL. He worked for 17 to 18 years under the contractor and was terminated from services on
04.09.2014 without any notice or compensation which is against law. He has prayed that holding the termination of
his services bad in law, he be held entitled to be reinstated with back wages and benefits.
The case has been contested mainly by the Contractor M/s B P Viswakarma, who has taken a case in his
written statement of defense that Firstly, BSNL is not a industry, as per Section 2 (J) of the ‘Act’. Secondly, the
Workman never worked under the Contractor at any point of time. BSNL had awarded contract for Electrical
Maintenance to the Contractor M/s B P Viswakarma on 01.09.2013 for 2 years which has ended in 2015. Accordingly,
it has been prayed that the reference be answered against the Workman.
In evidence, the Workman has filed his affidavit as his examination-in-chief; the Contractor has also filed
his affidavit as his examination-in-chief. The workman filed an application for summoning of records which he not
pressed during the proceedings. His this endorsement is recorded in the application and this application has been
dismissed vide order dated 02.01.2024, has not pressed.
I have heard argument of the Workman in person and Learned Counsel for Contractor Shri Hari Om
Gupta. I have gone through the record as well.
The reference itself is the issue for determination.
The initial burden to prove his case that he worked from 1997 to 04.09.2014 that is the date of termination
of his services is on Workman. He has filed only his self serving affidavit. In absence of any other corroboration, this
affidavit cannot be relied upon to hold his engagement proved.
1080
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Hence, holding that workman could not successfully prove his engagement by Contractor as claimed
by him, the reference deserves to be answered against the workman, and is answered accordingly.
No order as to cost.
DATE:- 23/01/2025
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 396.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,केन्रीय
सरकार उप मिाप्रबंिक, पावर जिड कॉपोरेिन ऑफ इंजडया जलजमटेड, ग्वाजलयर, प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री
वीरेंर वसंि र्ौरजसया, कामगार, के बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण- सि- श्रम न्यायालय,
िबलपुर पंर्ाट (संिभच संख्या आईडी नंबर सीिीआईटी/एलसी/आर/25/2017), को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया
िै,प्रकाजित करती िै िो केन्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 27.02.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-42012/177/2015-आईआर(डीयू)]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 6th March, 2025
S.O. 396.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. ID.No. CGIT/LC/R/25/2017), of the Central Government
Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the
employers in relation to The Deputy General Manager, Power Grid Corporation Of India Ltd., Gwalior, and
Shri Virendra Singh Chourasia, Worker, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central
Government on 27.02.2025,
[No. L-42012/177/2015-IR(DU)]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/25/2017
Present: P.K.Srivastava
H.J.S..(Retd)
Shri Virendra Singh Chourasia
S/o Shri Ashok Kumar Chourasia,
R/o Huravali Ward No. 60,
Po. Morar. Gwalior - 474006
Workman
Vs
The Deputy General Manager,
Power Grid Corporation Of India Ltd.,
400/220, KV Sub Station, Village: Adupura,
PO:Roura, NH, Jhansi Road,
Gwalior - 475001
Management
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1081
(JUDGMENT)
(Passed on this 27thday of January-2025)
As per letter dated 03/03/2017 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
made to this Tribunal under Section-10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the ‘Act’)as per Notification
No. L-42012/177/2015-IR(DU) dt. 03/03/2017. The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action of the management of Dy. General Manager, Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.,
in terminating the services of workman Shri Virendra Singh Chourasia, S/o Shri Ashok Kumar Chourasia
w.e.f. Sep, 2013 without following the provisions of ID Act is justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled
for?”
Notices were issued to the parties and they appeared and filed their respective documents which were
resolved.
According to the Workman he was appointed as a Daily wager with the Management on 01.05.2005 and
worked as such till September, 2013 continuously.
He was disengaged by the Management without any notice or compensation which is in violation of
Section 25 F and 25 G of the Act. He raised a dispute which cannot be conciliated, hence this reference.
He has prayed that holding termination of his services against law, he be held entitled to be reinstated
with backwages and benefits.
The Management appeared through its Learned Counsel but did not care to filed any written statement of
defense.
In spite of opportunities given, no evidences in form of affidavit or documents were filed by any of the
parties.
None appeared for arguments. No written argument was filed.
I have gone through the record.
The initial burden to prove his claim is on Workman, he has failed to discharge his burden.
Hence holding the claim of the Workman not proved, the reference deserves to be answered against
the Workman and is answered accordingly.
No order as to cost.
DATE:- 27/01/2025
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 397.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,केन्रीय
सरकार मुख्य अिीक्षक, सामान्य डाकघर (िी.पी.ओ.), इंिौर (मध्य प्रिेि), प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री नाथूराम
जगरवाल, कामगार, के बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण- सि- श्रम न्यायालय, िबलपुर
पंर्ाट(संिभच संख्या आईडी नंबर सीिीआईटी/एलसी/आर/46/2020), को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै,प्रकाजित
करती िै िो केन्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 27.02.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-42025-07-2025-आईआर(डीयू)-46]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 6th March, 2025
S.O. 397.—-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. ID.No. CGIT/LC/ R/46/2020), of the Central Government
Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the
employers in relation to The Chief Superintendent, General Post Office (G.P.O.), Indore-(Madhya Pradesh) and
Shri Nathuram Girwal, Worker, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government
on 27.02.2025,
[No. L-42025-07-2025-IR(DU)-46]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
1082
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/46/2020
Present: P.K.Srivastava
H.J.S..(Retd)
Shri Nathuram Girwal
S/o Shri Sitaram Girwal,
Khurdi, Tehsil : Mhow,
Distt. Indore (Madhya Pradesh)
Workman
Vs
The Chief Superintendent.,
General Post Office (G.P.O.),
Indore (Madhya Pradesh)
Management
(JUDGMENT)
(Passed on this 23th day of January-2025)
As per letter dated 08/07/2020 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
made to this Tribunal under Section-10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the ‘Act’)as per Notification No.J-
1(1-36)/2020-IR dt. 08.07.2020. The dispute under reference relates to:
“
)
?”
Notices were sent to the parties. Both appeared and filed their respective documents.
Case of the workman is mainly that, he was first appointed as Gramin Dak Sevak Branch Postmaster on
16.12.1985. The First Information Report was registered against him bearing Crime No. 47/1992 regarding
embezzlement of amount entrusted to him by the depositors, by way of misappropriating the amount in his favour. He
was terminated from services by Management on 31.12.1993. Thereafter, he was acquitted from all the charges by
Trial Court vide its judgment dated 03.11.2015 which was not challenged and is final. The Workman further states
that after being exhorted by the charges by Criminal Court, after Trial he deserves to be reinstated with full back
wages and benefits and has prayed accordingly.
Case of Management is mainly that firstly, the Workman is not a ‘Workman’ as defined under Section 2 (s)
of the Act and secondly, he was dismissed from services after full pleaded departmental enquiry conducted against
him with respect to major misconduct by way of misappropriating the amount of depositors interested to him by the
depositors. The charges were found proved in the enquiry, hence the punishment is not disproportionate to the charges
and that, since the acquittal by the Criminal Court is on the basis of benefit of doubt, he is not entitle to be reinstated.
Following issues were framed vide order dated 16.02.2024.
1. Whether the departmental enquiry conducted is legal and proper?
2. Whether the charges are proved?
3. Whether the punishment is proportionate to the charges proved?
4. Reliance to which the Workman is entitled?
Issue No. 1, has been taken as preliminary issue and has been answered against the workman holding the
departmental enquiry legal and proper. This order dated 04.10.2024 is the part of award.
Issue No. 2:-
The main ground taken by the Workman on this issue is that he has been acquitted of the same charges by
the Criminal Court after Trial. The judgment of the Criminal Court dated 03.11.2015 has been filed by him which
goes to show that he was acquitted giving him benefit of doubt and not on the ground that there was no evidence dealt
against him.
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1083
Settled preposition of law is that the standard of proof with respect to charge in Criminal Trail and
Departmental Enquiry is that in the first, the charge has to be proved beyond reasonable doubt whereas in that later, it
is required to be proved to the extent of probability only. Hence, only on the ground that he has been acquitted after
Trial giving him benefit of doubt the charges cannot be held not proved against him, when they are otherwise proved
by evidences in the enquiry.
Issue No. 2 is answered accordingly.
Issue No. 3:-
The charge of criminal breach of trust as mentioned above, is a major misconduct involving integrity of
an employee which is the basis of credibility; this is an act of moral turpitude. Hence, the punishment of dismissal of
workman from services cannot be held to be disproportionate to the charge proved. Hence, holding the punishment
proportionate to the charge, the issue is answered accordingly.
Issue No. 4, in the light of above findings, the workman is held entitled to no relief.
In the light of above discussion, the reference is answered as follows.
AWARD
The order of Superintendent, Post Office dismissing the services of the Workman vide his order
dated 31.12.1993 is held just and legal and Workman is held entitled to no benefit.
No order as to cost.
DATE:- 23/01/2025
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 398.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्रीय
सरकार मिाप्रबंिक, जसक्त्यूररटी पेपर जमल, िोिंगाबाि, प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और मिासजर्व, एसपीएम कमचर्ारी
संघ, िोिंगाबाि; अध्यक्ष, एसपीएम कमचर्ारी संघ, िोिंगाबाि; मिासजर्व, एसपीएम कमचर्ारी संघ, िोिंगाबाि, के बीर्
अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण- सि- श्रम न्यायालय, िबलपुर पंर्ाट (संिभच संख्या आईडी नंबर
सीिीआईटी/एलसी/आर/222/1993), को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै,प्रकाजित करती िै िो केन्रीय सरकार को
सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 27.02.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-42025-07-2025-आईआर(डीयू)-44]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 6th March, 2025
S.O. 398.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. ID.No. CGIT/LC/R/222/1993), of the Central Government
Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the
employers in relation to The General Manager, Security Paper Mill, Hoshangabad, and The General Secretary,
SPM Employees Union, Hoshangabad ;The President, SPM Staff Union, Hoshangabad;The General Secretary,
SPM Karmachari Union, Hoshangabad, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central
Government on 27.02.2025,
[No. L-42025-07-2025-IR(DU)-44]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/222/1993
Present: P.K.Srivastava
H.J.S..(Retd)
1. The General Secretary,
SPM Employees Union,
Hoshangabad – 461001
1084
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2. The President,
SPM Staff Union,
Hoshangabad – 461001
3. The General Secretary,
SPM Karmachari Union,
Hoshangabad - 461001
Workman
Vs
The General Manager,
Security Paper Mill,
Hoshangabad - 461001
Management
(JUDGMENT)
(Passed on this 31st day of January-2025)
As per letter dated 20/10/1993 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
made to this Tribunal under Section-10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the ‘Act’)as per Notification No. L-
16011/1/91-IR(DY) dt. 11/10/2012. The dispute under reference relates to:
”Whether the demand of the workers of S.P.M., Hoshangabad to work for 44 hours in a week like the
workers working in other presses of Ministry of Finance is justified? If yes, what relief the workmen concerned are
entitled to?”
The facts connected in brief are mainly that the Security Paper Mill, Hoshangbad, is under the Ministry of
Finance, and is undisputedly Industry as defined under Section 2 (j) of the Act. According to his Circular of Ministry
of Finance, the total No. of working hours in all the Security Press and Mints has fixed at 44 hours in a week. This
benefit under this Circular of 1968, was not granted to the Workmen working in the Security Paper Mill,
Hoshangabad, hence, the Workman Union raised a dispute. After failure of conciliation, a reference was made by
Central Government to this Tribunal.
The Management appeared and contested the case.
On the basis of evidence on record produced by both the sides, this reference was decided by my Learned
Predecessor by his judgment and Award dated 10.01.2006. The Award is being reproduced as follows:
“It is hereby held that the demand of the workers of SPM, Hoshanagabad to work for 44 Hours in a week
like the workers working in other presses of Ministry of fiancé is justified and therefore the working hours of the
employees of SPM, Hoshangabad be deemed to be 44 hours from the time of demand was taken up by the Union in
1968 and for the extra work taken from the workers, they should be given overtime as per statutory provisions
applicable to the workers with cost of this reference. The reference is decided accordingly in favour of the workers
and against the management.”
The Management challenged this Award, by way of filing W.P. No. 5388/2006 on various grounds
including the ground that the Union and Management have entered into a Settlement on 06.01.1995, and based on this
Settlement, benefit claimed cannot be granted from 1968.
After hearing the submissions from both the sides, the writ was decided by a Single Bench of Hon’ble
High Court of M.P. with following directions vide order dated 26.03.2008.
“Under the circumstances the Tribunal since has not given any reasons for fixing the date for making the
Award operative in terms to Section 17-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, therefore it will be appropriate to
remand the matter to the Tribunal. After the remand it shall only be limited for giving of the reasons to justify the
year 1968 which is already fixed by the Tribunal to make the Award operative. The necessary proceedings shall be
completed within a period of two months from today and accordingly the Tribunal shall pass an appropriate order
in accordance with law. However, it is observed that in case no justification if found by the Tribunal to fix the date
as “1968” then Tribunal shall be entitled to fix any other date, later to the date “1968” Both the parties shall
appear before the Tribunal on 7th April 2008 and the Tribunal shall also be entitled to record the evidence in case
eventuality arises.”
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1085
The reference was again decided by my Learned Predecessor vide his judgment and Award dated 18.11.2013.
Following Award was passed.
“Award dated 10.01.2006” be given effect from the date of reference that is 20.10.1993.
The management challenged the second Award also in W.P. No. 16022/2014, which was heard and
decided vide order dated 26.09.2024. The reference was again remanded with following directions to this Tribunal.
Tribunal is directed to consider the judgment passed in W.P. No. 5388/2006 in letter and spirit and give
reasons for fixing a cut-off date or extension of such benefits to the petitioner.
Now, the matter has been heard at length by this Tribunal with respect to the directions issued by Hon’ble
High Court in the second remand order. Learned Senior Counsel Mr. Anoop Nair, assisted by Learned Counsel Mr.
Neeraj Kewat, submitted his arguments for the Union. Learned Counsel Mr. Anand Nayak appeared for Management
and submitted his arguments. Both the sides have filed written arguments also.
I have gone through the record in the light of arguments from both the sides.
The first argument raised by Management is that right from inspection of the Mill, the working hours
were 48 hours in a week. The demand of the Workmen Union to keep it at par with other Presses under the department
to 44 hours in a week as mentioned in the Officer Circular of 1968 cannot be granted for the reasons, Firstly, the
Manufacturing is the continuous process unlike other presses, and Secondly, the Factories Act, provides 48 hours of
working in a week. Learned Counsel has referred to Judgments of Hon’ble High Court in the following cases in
Support of his argument that Tribunal is well within its jurisdiction to grant relief from the date it thinks fit.
1. Workman V.s. Metro Theatre Limited, (1981) Volume 3 SCC Page 596;
2. The Workman V.s. Kolkata Dock Labour Board (1901) Vol. 3 SCC 216,
3. Indian Reserve Bank Employees Organisation V.s. RBI, (1965) SCC Online 125.
4. Inder Singh & Sons V.s. Their Workman (1961) LLJ 89,
5. Workmen V.s. Joseph & Company (1964) Volume 1 LLJ 451 SC.
Learned Counsel has further submitted that keeping in view the principles laid down in the cases above,
the finding of my Learned Predecessor in the Second Award with regards to the date from the benefits under the
Circular of 1968 is to be granted, is not against law.
On the other hand, Learned Senior Counsel Mr. Nair appearing for Workmen Union has submitted that
the point to be decided is very limited by Hon’ble High Court in the second remand order, which is only that the
benefits admissible in the Circular of 1968, be extended from which date and on what grounds? Learned Counsel has
referred to judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of State Bank of India V.s. Ram Chandra Dubey & Ors.
(2001) Volume 1 SCC 73 and has submitted that when all the other pleas against the Award were raised by
Management side, specifically the plea that the benefits should be extended from the date of Settlement recorded
between Workmen Union and the Management in 1995,as mention above, was not considered by Hon’ble High Court
in any of its two Orders, it shall be deemed that these pleas have been rejected by Hon’ble High Court.
Learned Senior Counsel had further submitted that, the dispute was raised by three Unions, names
mentioned in the reference itself, then one of the Union entered into Settlement during pendency of the reference,
hence, it cannot be held binding on the other Unions also. He has also submitted that the persons, who signed as
Office Bearers of the one Union, were authorized duly by the Union to enter into a Settlement and sign it on the
behalf of its member is required to be proved by Management. The Management could prove it by filling resolution of
the Workmen Union authorizing its Office Bearers to enter into Settlement on behalf of the Union on the terms and
conditions mentioned in the Settlement. In absence of such evidence, none of the Workmen, even the members of the
Workmen Union, Office Bearers of which signed the Settlement and in no case it will bind the members of the other
to Unions who were not a signatory to the Settlement. Learned Senior Counsel has referred to Judgment of General
Manager Security Paper Mill V.s. R.S. Sharma and Others (1986) Volume 2 SCC 151 and Shramik Seva Sangh
V.s. Indian Hume Pipe Limited (1993) Volume 2 SCC 386 as well Management of Weanger V.s. Workman (1964)
SC 864 in this respect.
Since the Circular of 1968 does not mention that the maximum working hours of 44 hours in a week fixed
by it will not be applicable in the case of the Management of Security Paper Mills, hence, on the ground that the
activities conducted in the Security Paper Mill, Hoshangabad, is continuous and without break, or any provision in
Factories Act hence, benefits admissible under the Circular of 1968 could not be granted to employees of Security
Paper Mill, Hoshangabad, cannot be accepted.
On examination of the whole matter, three different dates which could be considered for grant of benefits
provided under the Circular of 1968 are firstly, the date of Circular, secondly, the date of reference or date of Award,
and thirdly, the date of Settlement claimed to be entered into and signed by one of the your main Unions in 1995 as
stated by Management.
1086
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Section 17 (A) of the Industrial Disputes, Act, 1947 is being reproduced as follows:
An Award including an arbitration Award shall become enforceable on the expiry of thirty days from the date of its
publication under Section 17:
Provided that-
(a)
if the appropriate Government is of opinion, in any case where the Award has been given by a
Labour Court or Tribunal in relation to an industrial dispute to which it is a party; or
(b)
if the Central Government is of opinion, in any case where the Award has been given by a
National Tribunal,
that it will be inexpedient on public grounds affecting national economy or social justice to give
effect to the whole or any part of the Award, the appropriate Government, or as the case may be, the
Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, declare that the Award shall not become
enforceable on the expiry of the said period of thirty days.
(2) Where any declaration has been made in relation to an Award under the proviso to sub-
section (1), the appropriate Government or the Central Government may, within ninety days from the date
of publication of the Award under section 17, make an order rejecting or modifying the Award, and shall,
on the first available opportunity, lay the Award together with a copy of the order before the Legislature of
the State, if the order has been made by a State Government, or before Parliament, if the order has been
made by the Central Government.
(3) Where any Award as rejected or modified by an order made under sub-section (2) is laid
before the Legislature of a State or before Parliament, such Award shall become enforceable on the expiry
of fifteen days from the date on which it is so laid; and where no order under sub-section (2) is made in
pursuance of a declaration under the proviso to sub-section (1), the Award shall become enforceable on
the expiry of the period of ninety days referred to in sub-section (2).
(4) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (1) and sub-section (3) regarding the enforceability of
an Award, the Award shall come into operation with effect from such date as may be specified therein, but
where no date is so specified, it shall come into operation on the date when the Award becomes
enforceable under sub-section (1) or sub- section (3), as the case may be.
The reading of this provision make it clear that an Award may come into force from any such date as
specified in the Award itself or if no such date is specified, it shall come into force on the date it becomes enforceable
under Sub-section 1 of Sub-section 3
In the light of this provision there could be three possible dates from which the Award could be made
enforceable these are again the date of Circular, or date of reference, or date of Award.
In the first Award, passed by my Learned Predecessor, it was made enforceable from the date of Circular.
In the second Award, it was made enforceable from the date of reference. The case of Management is that it should be
made enforceable from the date of Settlement. The question here arises as to hands of justice will be served by
making the Award enforceable from the date of the three days.
As mentioned earlier, the Circular of 1968 does not provide any date from which it is to be made
enforceable hence, by way of implication it could be held that this Circular will come into force from the date of its
issue. In other words, benefits granted under this Circular will normally be admissible to the beneficiaries from the
date of the Circular itself.
I have gone through the Settlement of 1995 which has been early emphasized by Learned Counsel for
Management, for deciding the date from which the benefits admissible in the Circular could be granted.
The terms of the Settlement, are being reproduced:-
1. It is hereby agreed that the normal hours of work for all the employees, other than those whose normal
hours of work are already 44 hours per week (Administration, Accounts & Accounts Unit of the Security
Paper Mill), will be 44 hours per week with effect from 15-1-1995.
2. It is also agreed that where need be, in the interest of production, workmen/staff will work for 48 hours
per week and extra 4 hours will be suitably compensated as per rules. This is required especially for the
manufacturing process being continuous in nature.
3. It is agreed that the S.P.M. Employee Union will extend full co-operation in the implementation of the
change in working hours as agreed and will maintain the production at desired level.
4. It is also agreed that both the parties will jointly submit an application along-with a copy of this
Settlement before the C.G.I.T., Jabalpur for closing the pending reference case No. CGIT/LC(R)(222)/93,
on this issue for which this Settlement arrived at between both the parties.
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1087
Section 18 of the Act required to be referred here and is being reproduced as follows:-
18. Persons on whom Settlements and Awards are binding.
(1)
A Settlement arrived at by agreement between the employer and workman otherwise than in the course of
conciliation proceeding shall be binding on the parties to the agreement.
(2)
Subject to the provisions of sub-section (3), an arbitration Award which has become enforceable shall be
binding on the parties to the agreement who referred the dispute to arbitration.
(3)
A Settlement arrived at in the course of conciliation proceedings under this Act [or an arbitration Award
in a case where a notification has been issued under sub-section (3-A) of section 10-A or an Award of a
Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal, an Award which is declared by the appropriate Government
to be binding under sub-section (2) of section 15" . which has become enforceable shall be binding on-
(a)
all parties to the industrial dispute;
(b)
all other parties summoned to appear in the proceedings as parties to the dispute, unless the
Board, arbitrator Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal as the case may be, records the
opinion that they were so summoned without proper cause;
(c)
where a party referred to in clause (a) or clause (b) is an employer, his heirs, successors or
assigns in respect of the establishment to which the dispute relates;
(d)
where a party referred to in clause (a) or clause (b) is composed of workmen, all persons who
were employed in the establishment or part of the establishment, as the case may be, to which the
dispute relates on the date of the dispute and all persons who subsequently become employed in
that establishment or part.
The reading of this section makes it clear that a Settlement arrived at between Employer and the Workmen
not under conciliation proceedings, shall be binding on the parties to the agreement and Settlement revived in
conciliation proceedings under the Act, shall be binding on all the parties to a Industrial Dispute.
The question here arises as to when from the three Unions, one Union who are a party to the dispute
entered into a Settlement with Management which as the effect of relinquishing rights accrued to the Workmen who
are member of the all three Unions, will be binding on members of the all Unions even if they are not a Signatory to
the Settlement or not. Section 18(1) makes it clear that when the Settlement is not under the conciliation proceedings,
it shall be binding only on the parties to the Settlement. The situation becomes different when the Settlement is
entered into before the Conciliation Officer, in a conciliation proceeding. It comes out from the perusal of the
Settlement, that this Settlement was signed reached and signed in 1995, when the reference was pending before this
Tribunal since 1993. Also, it comes out that there is a joint application of all the Office Bearers of the Workmen
Union who was a signatory to the Settlement and General Manager of the Security Paper Mill jointly signed on
07.01.1995, probably intended to be filed before this Tribunal. The order-sheet of the case filed shows that the case
was earlier fixed on 05.12.1994. It was fixed for 18.01.1995 for filing Written Statement by Management.
Management sought adjournments for Written Statement on 18.01.1995, 14.02.1995, 31.03.1995 and ultimately it was
filed on 02.04.1996.
I have gone through the Written Statement also, which is filed by Management. The Written Statement/
Counter Reply filed by Management does not mention about any Settlement of 1995 through the written statement
was filed at least more than one year after the date of Settlement.
Secondly, one of the terms and condition of the Settlement was that, it will be filed before the Tribunal,
by way of the joint application with a copy of the Settlement. This condition was never complied. It is to be kept
in mind that when the Settlement was arrived at, there was no conciliation pending before the Labour Commissioner,
and the dispute was pending on the basis of reference before this Tribunal. When the matter is pending before this
Tribunal on the basis of reference, which is to be answered by this Tribunal, it was incumbent on the parties to the
Settlement of 1995, to file it before this Tribunal, and request this Tribunal to pass an Award in the light of Settlement
which was not done. Hence, this Settlement losses its legal value on this ground. Furthermore, there is nothing on
record at any stage that, the Union office Bearers who signed the Settlement was duly authorized by Union for this. It
is to be kept in mind that, the Union Office Bearers, are only the Agents and Servants of their Principal and Masters,
the Workmen who are the members of the Union. On this ground also this Settlement of 1995 loses its legal values
and it becomes not even the worth the paper on which it has been typed and signed.
In the light of above arguments, the argument of Learned Counsel for Management that the benefits under
the Circular are admissible only from the date of Settlement of 1995 false and cannot be accepted.
No doubt the Tribunal is within its powers to make the benefits given in its Award, from any date as
mentioned above, but the fact still remains that when this Tribunal decides a date for enforcement of Award or
enforcement of benefits under the Award, there must be some reasons behind it. In the case in hand, it has been
1088
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
observed that since the Circular of 1968, does not mention any specific date of its enforcement. Naturally, it will be
deemed that it will applicable from the date it was issued. It is the specific case of the Workmen Union that they have
been persistently requesting the to the Management that benefits be granted under the Circular of 1968 laid down
since the date of its issue and have been filed representations in this respect. They had to raise a dispute only when it
was impressed on them that the benefits could not be granted to them. There is nothing on record from the side of
Management, to rebut this preposition by Workmen side. In these circumstances, I am of the considered view that the
ends of justice will be served only if benefits are granted from the date of the issue of Circular of the 1968. In the light
of above findings the reference is answered as follows.
AWARD
Holding the demand of the Workers of the Security Paper Mills, Hoshangabad to work for 44 hours in
a week like Workers working in other presses of Ministry of Finance justified, they are held entitled to
payment of overtime as per Rules for the period they have worked more than 44 hours in a week from the date
of issue of Circular of 1968.
No order as to cost.
DATE:- 31/01/2025
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 399.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,केन्रीय
सरकार नेिनल थमचल पावर कॉरपोरेिन, एनटीपीसी जलजमटेड, ववंध्यनगर, वसंगरौली- (म.प्र.); यूरटजलटी पावरटेक
जलजमटेड, (एनटीपीसी और ररलायंस इंफ्रास्ट्रक्त्र्र जलजमटेड का संयुक्त उद्यम), नोएडा, (उ.प्र.); सजर्व, जवद्युत मंत्रालय,
श्रम िजक्त भवन, रफी मागच, नई दिल्ली, प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री िीपक नामिेव, कामगार, के बीर् अनुबंि में
जनर्िचष्ट केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण- सि- श्रम न्यायालय, िबलपुर पंर्ाट(संिभच संख्या आईडी
नंबर सीिीआईटी/एलसी/ए/02/2024), को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै,प्रकाजित करती िै िो केन्रीय सरकार
को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 27.02.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-42025-07/2025-आईआर(डीयू)-45]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 6th March, 2025
S.O. 399.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. ID.No. CGIT/LC/ A/02/2024), of the Central Government
Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the
employers in relation to National Thermal Power Corporation, NTPC Ltd., Vindhyanagar, Singrauli-(M.P.);
Utility Powertech Limited,(A Joint Venture of NTPC& Reliance Infrastructure Ltd.),Noida, (U.P.) ; The
Secretary, Ministry of Power, Shram Shakti Bhawan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi, and Shri Deepak Namdeo,
Worker, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 27.02.2025,
[No. L-42025-07-2025-IR(DU)-45]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR
COURT, JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/A/02/2024
Present: P.K.Srivastava
H.J.S..(Retd)
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1089
Deepak Namdeo,
S/o Shri Vidya Bhushan Singh,
Occupation: Junior Reception Officer,
AIIMS, Bhopal (M.P.)
R/o A-16, Soumya Privilige,
Near Mahakali, Society, Opp. Aura Mall,
Trilanga, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh
Workman
Versus
1.
National Thermal Power Corporation,
NTPC Ltd., Vindhyanagar, Singrauli(M.P.)
Through its Chief General Manager
2.
Utility Powertech Limited,
(A Joint Venture of NTPC& Reliance
Infrastructure Ltd.)
UPL House, W-24, Sector 11,
Noida, (U.P.)-201301
3.
Union of India
Through the Secretary,
Ministry of Power,
Shram Shakti Bhawan, Rafi Marg,
New Delhi, India.
Management
(JUDGMENT)
(Passed on this 28th day of January - 2025)
Petition under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act (the ‘Act’) has been filed by the petitioner
workman with the case that during his employment under the Management, he was allotted a Residence, by
Management inside the campus wherein he was living. He was arbitrarily terminated by Management, against which
he raised a dispute and a reference in this respect is pending for disposal in this Tribunal. The Management threatens
the petitioner to dispossess him from the residence allotted to him while he was under employment of Management
which is in violation of Section 33 of the Act. The petitioner sought direction to Management restraining them from
dispossessing him from the residence allotted till disposal of the reference before this Tribunal.
In its written reply to the petition, Management has taken a case that the petitioner himself vacated the
residence allotted on 08.08.2024 and handed over possession to Management. An affidavit has been filed by
Management.
Today, when the case was listed for hearing, the petitioner also filed an application to withdraw the
petition on the ground that he has handed over vacant possession of the residence allotted to Management.
Now when it is settled that, the cause of action does not survive at present. The petition has become
infructuous and stands disposed accordingly.
No order as to cost.
DATE:- 28/01/2025
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 400.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्रीय
सरकार जर्दकत्सा जनिेिक, राम मनोिर लोजिया अस्ट्पताल, बाबा खड़क वसंि मागच, नई दिल्ली; मेससच गुड ईयर
1090
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
जसक्त्योररटी सर्वचसेि, द्वारका सेक्त्टर-8, दिल्ली, के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री अिय कुमार बिगत एवं 32 अन्य,
कामगार, द्वारा -विंिुस्ट्तान इंिीजनयररंग एवं िनरल मििूर यूजनयन, करमपुरा, नई दिल्ली के बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट
केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण- सि- श्रम न्यायालय-1 नई दिल्ली पंर्ाट (संिभच संख्या 388/2023) को िैसा दक
अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै, प्रकाजित करती िै िो केन्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 03.03.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ
था l
[सं. एल-42025-07/2025-आईआर(डीयू)-43]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 6th March, 2025
S.O. 400.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 388/2023) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum
Labour Court–I New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to
The Medical Director, Ram Manohar Lohiya Hospital, Baba Kharak Singh Marg, New Delhi ; M/s Good Year
Security Services, Dwarka Sector-8, Delhi, and Shri Ajay Kumar Bahgat & 32 Others, Worker, Through -
Hindustan Engineering & General Mazdoor Union, Karampura, New Delhi, which was received along with soft
copy of the award by the Central Government on 03.03.2025.
[No. L-42025-07-2025-IR(DU)-43]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM – LABOUR COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI
ID No. 388/2023
Sh. Ajay Kumar Bahgat & 32 Others,
Through Hindustan Engineering & General Mazdoor Union, I-219,
Karampura, New Delhi-110015.
…Applicant/Claimant
Versus
1. The Medical Director, Ram Manohar Lohiya Hospital, Baba Kharak Singh Marg, New Delhi-110011.
2. M/s Good Year Security Services, A-75, Upper Ground Floor, Dwarka Sector-8, Delhi.
…Managements/respondents
Counsels:
For Applicant/ Claimant:
None for the claimant.
For Management/ Respondent:
None for the management.
AWARD
1. In the present case, a reference was received from the appropriate Government vide letter ND-25/III-34/2023
dated 02.01.2024 under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for adjudication of a dispute, terms of
which are as under:
“Whether the demand of Sh. Ajay Kumar & 32 others through Hindustan Engineering & General
Mazdoor Union (details mentioned in Annexure-A) against the management of M/s Good Year Security
Services contractor of Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital for payment of bonus for the period 2016-17, 2017-
18, 2018-19, is legal and justified? If so, what relief workmen concerned are entitled and what directions
are necessary in this respect?”
2.
In the reference order, the appropriate Government directed the parties raising the dispute to file statement
of claim, complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses with this Tribunal within 15 days of receipt
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1091
of the reference order and to forward a copy of such statement of claim to the opposite parties involved in the dispute.
Despite directions so given, Claimant/ union opted not to file the claim statement with the Tribunal.
3.
On receipt of the above reference, notice was sent to the workman as well as the managements. Neither the
postal article sent to the claimant, referred above, was received back nor was it observed by the Tribunal that postal
services remained unserved in the period, referred above. Therefore, every presumption lies in favor of the fact that
the above notice was served upon the claimant. Despite service of the notice, claimant opted to abstain away from the
proceedings. No claim statement was filed on his behalf on all four dates of hearing. Thus, it is clear that the
workman is not interested in adjudication of the reference on merits.
In light of the fact that the claimants have not been appearing to pursue their claim, their claim has resulted
in No Dispute Award. Award is passed accordingly. A copy of this award is sent to appropriate government for
notification under section 17 of the I.D. Act.
Dated 12.02.2025
ATUL KUMAR GARG, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 401.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्रीय
सरकार मुख्य जनवाचर्न अजिकारी, िीएनसीटी, दिल्ली, के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री मुन्नी लाल कुमार व 20
अन्य, कामगार, के बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण- सि- श्रम न्यायालय-1 नई दिल्ली पंर्ाट
(संिभच संख्या 69/2024) को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै, प्रकाजित करती िै िो केन्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी
के साथ 03.03.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-42025-07/2025-आईआर(डीयू)-42]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 6th March, 2025
S.O. 401.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 69/2024) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum
Labour Court–I New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to
The Chief Electoral Officer, GNCT of Delhi, and Shri Munni Lal Kumar & 20 Ors. Worker, which was
received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 03.03.2025.
[No. L-42025-07-2025-IR(DU)-42]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT DELHI-1
I.D. No.69 /2024
Munni Lal Kumar & 20 Ors.
Vs.
Chief Electoral Officer, GNCT of Delhi
Misc App.No. __282____ / 24 (complaint u/s 33 ID Act)
Sh. Rajiv Agarwal, Siddharth Sapra, Navalendu Bhushan,
Advocates, A/Rs for workmen
Ms. Aditi Gupta, Advocate for Management
Justice Vikas Kunvar Srivastava
Retired Judge, Allahabad High Court
(Presiding Officer)
1092
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ORDER
This order is intended to decide Miscellaneous application moved by Claimants to grant ad interim relief in their
favour against the management of GNCTD in I.D. No.69 /2024 Munni Lal Kumar & 20 Ors. vs. Chief Electoral
Officer, GNCT of Delhi. In view of the above the Industrial dispute and miscellaneous application referred above is
taken up for the purpose of hearing and decision.
FACTUAL MATRIX
Before going through the contents of Miscellaneous Application bearing number ___282_/2024 in the industrial
dispute case of Munni Lal Kumar & 20 Ors. vs. Chief Electoral Officer, GNCT of Delhi, It would be pertinent to have
reference made by the Central Government vide Order No. ND-25/III-4/2024-IR dated 19.03.2024. It runs as under:-
“1. Whether the Central Govt. is appropriate Govt. for Office of the Chief Electoral Officer, Govt. of NCT of Delhi
u/s 2(a) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947?"
2. Whether the Office of the chief Electoral Officer, Govt. of NCT of Delhi is covered under the definition of the
'Industry' u/s(j) of the Industry Dispute Act, 1947 is relation to the work performed by the claimant Shri Munni Lal
Kumar & 20 others (details mentioned in Annexure-A)?
3. Whether the claimants Shri Munni Lal Kumar & 20 others (details mentioned in Annexure-A) are covered under
the definition of 'workman' u/s 2 (s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947?
4. Whether the demand of Shri Munni Lal Kumar & 20 others (details mentioned in Annexure-A) through Delhi
Parshashan Vikas Vibhag industrial Employees Union for regularisation in in services and salary as per pay scale of
peon / Chowkidar and allowances with retrospective effect from the initial date of their joining along with all
consequential benefits and with all arrears on the principle of equal pay for equal work, is legal and justified? If so,
what relief workmen concerned are entitled and what directions are necessary in this respect?”
The industrial dispute made by the appropriate government is directed against the management of Chief Electoral
Officer, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, impleaded as the opposite party in the statement of claim.
The claimants workmen who are detailed and described with their initial date of joining and designation in concerned
departments of Govt. of NCT of Delhi in Charts under the heading “SCHEDULE” annexed at the bottom of this order
have stated in their claim statement that the office of the management/opposite party, Chief Electoral Officer, Govt. of
NCT of Delhi has been set-up in Delhi in accordance with the Section 13A of the Representation of the People Act,
1950. The Office is headed by Chief Electoral Officer, who works under the overall direction, superintendence and
control of the Election Commission of India for all election related activities such as preparation of electoral rolls,
preparation and issuance of electors photo identity cards and to conduct elections to seventy assembly constituencies
of Delhi Legislative Assembly and seven Lok Sabha seats of Delhi. The management has one Office of Chief
Electoral Officer, seventy voter centres and 11 district offices. The claimants/workman have joined into employment
in office of the management with effect from the date as mentioned in said charts have been working as Peon-cum-
Chowkidar in various offices/voter centres of the management, which are severable from the sovereign and regal
functions of the management and as such in relation to the works having been done by them the management comes
within the ambit of “industry” as defined in the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( for the purpose of brevity which shall
here in after be called as “ the Act” only).
The workmen were currently being paid wages at the rate of Rs.844/- per day which in month payable to the
workmen for the actual number of days they have worked. The works performed by the workmen are regular and
perennial in nature, still the management shows the workmen engaged for 89 days followed by one day unnatural
break which is only on papers while workmen use to attend duties on the day of that mandatory unnatural break also.
They work 12 hours every day without payment of overtime wages. They are made to work all days in a month, still
they are not paid their salary of two days every month. The workmen concerned have been working against vacant
posts of their designation shown in the chart continuously from the date of their initial joining. The workmen
concerned have also joined the civil defence corps as volunteers with spirit to serve humanity in the event of any
disaster without expecting valuable consideration in lieu of their contribution with the no objection accorded by their
department to attend call out duty in the disaster management by the civil defence corp. for such call out duty neither
the management is employer nor the volunteers are employees and that stands on the footing of quite a different
contribution than that of service as workmen rendered at their place of employment in GNCTD.
The concerned workmen raised their grievances through the Labour Union namely, “Delhi Parshashan Vikas
Vibhag Industrial Employee Union”. The management, irrespective of the actual status of the workmen concerned
in employment of GNCTD shows them as volunteers engaged from the Civil Defence Volunteers Corps with a view
to deny the employment benefit to the workmen. But when the management did not pay heed, the same was agitated
before the conciliation officer of the Labour Department of Central Government. The conciliation officer vide order
dated 16.05.2023 issued notice to the management and advised them to adhere to the provision of Section 33 of the ID
Act with respect to service condition of the workmen. Despite that, the management tried to terminate the services of
the concerned workmen. Apprehending their source of livelihood imperilled workmen approached the High Court of
Delhi filing a writ petition no. W.P. (C) 8153/2023. Hon’ble High Court vide order dated 01.06.2023 issued following
directions:
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1093
“5. Taking into account the communication dated 16.05.2023 by Respondent No. 2 to Respondent No. 1, the
Respondent No. 1 is directed to ensure that till the next date the services of the Petitioners who are working
as Civil Defence Volunteers with Respondent No. 1 for the last six to fourteen years, are not replaced by
another set of ad-hoc employees.”
It is the case of workmen that when despite the direction of the Hon’ble High Court quoted hereinabove the
management terminated the services of the workmen in management of GNCTD in the garb of terminating continuing
call out duties by issuing office order dated 31.10.2023. Office order dated 31.10.2023 was served upon workmen
concerned on 02.11.2023.The office order 31.10.2023 runs as under:
“Whereas, as per provision of the Civil Defence Act, 1968 and rules and regulations thereunder, the civil Defence
Volunteers (CDVs) are to be disaster called out only for dealing with hostile attack or for management;
And whereas, it has been called for duties in various departments of GNCTD which is contrary to the provisions of
the Civil Defence Act, 1968 and the rules & regulations made thereunder;
And whereas, it has been noted that the aforesaid call out of Civil Defence Volunteer needs to be ended with
immediate effect;
Now therefore, Director Civil Defence/Divisional Commissioner is pleased to end to all its members of Civil Defence
Corps (Civil Defence Volunteers) Deployed in any) department/office with effect from 31 Oct, 2023 (A/N).
This issues with the approval of the Competent Authority.”
Meanwhile, when the Writ Petition W.P.(C) No. 8153/2023 was taken up for the hearing, wherein the interim
protection granted to the claimants was extended vide order dated 19.01.2024. Lateron, as per order dated 24.01.2024
passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in the W.P.(C). 8153/ 2023:
“12. In view of the aforesaid discussion, petitioner are directed to approach the CGIT with an application, if
not filed, within two weeks from today seeking interim relief and the Ld. CGIT is directed to decide the
dispute in relation to the entitlement of petitioner for the grant of any interim relief as expeditiously as
possible in accordance with law without being influenced by any of the proceedings before this court. It is
further directed that the CGIT shall not grant any unnecessary adjournments to either party.”
Further, the aforesaid Order was clarified vide Order dated 21.02.2024 the following:
“In view of the aforesaid discussion, this court is of the view that the order dated 24th January 2024 shall be
clarified. It is clarified by this Court that the order passed by this court on 24th January 2024 shall be read
as status quo ante as on 6th December 2023 till the disposal of application filed for seeking interim relief
before the CGIT.”
In the instant Misc. Application it is stated that workmen/claimants have also moved complaint under section 33 A of
the Act in connection with the above Industrial Dispute and also that their services have been illegally terminated by
the management whilst the said industrial dispute is pending for adjudication. It is further stated that despite the
direction of the Hon’ble High Court dated 06.12.2023 regarding payment of wages and continuance of duties, the
management did not pay the salary for the month of Nov 2023 and so on. They have been rendered unemployed after
that. They have a young family and old parents to take care of. They also have to pay many of their liabilities such as
EMIs etc. However, the management showing a vindictive approach terminated their services.
In the wake of above facts instant application prays to grant interim relief during the pendency of the Industrial
Dispute as well the complaint under section 33 A of the Act in terms of wages last drawn every month and to issue
direction to the management to take back the workmen on duty and pass any such other order as deemed fit in favour
of the workmen as against the management.
In written statement as against the claim statement of the workmen and also reply to the complaint under section 33 of
the Act, the management states claimants only volunteers under the Civil Defence Act, and that Secretary, Revenue
and Divisional Commissioner, Revenue are the authorities, to engage/recruit Civil Defence Volunteers under the Civil
Defence Act, 1968. As per the management, the claimants are meant to carry out the Civil Defence or Disaster
Management activities and that they can be called on paid duty as per requirement in accordance with Section 9 of the
Civil Defence Regulations 1968, where they are paid duty allowances and conveyance allowances on per day basis.It
is also contended by the management that it is not an industry under Section 2(j) of the I.D Act, as they are neither
producing any goods and services nor the electoral rolls and elections are conducted to satisfy human needs and
wishes. The management has claimed to be performing the sovereign functions and constitutional obligations of the
ECI under Article 324 of the Constitution of India and are not discharging any commercial activity/economic venture.
The organisation of Civil Defence Volunteers is stated to be a volunteer organisation where individuals from
private/public sector can register themselves as Civil Defense Volunteers and their services are utilised as and when
required during disaster and providing relief to the affected people.
1094
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
In the light of above facts the instant miscellaneous applications in concerned I.D. case intended to be decided, the Ld.
AR for the workmen/claimants Shri Rajiv Agarwal, Advocate and one learned counsel Shri Sudhir Shukla, Advocate
opted to argue the case on behalf of the Standing Counsel of GNCTD Shri Rishikesh Kumar, Advocate though on the
ground of learned standing counsel hearing on the last preceding date was passed over and deferred. Parties are heard
over the instant application.
ARGUMENTS
The thrust of the argument opposing the prayer of claimants as interim relief during pendency of the industrial dispute
is on the words “Deployment is voluntary in nature only on need basis under the provision of Civil Defence Act” and
the claimants as volunteers deployed under the Civil Defence Act at the time of enrolment submitted no objection
certificate from their employer/undertaking that the employer has no objection to the individual volunteering with
Civil Defence Corps. Therefore, the claimants could not ask for their permanence/regularisation on their posts because
their deployment is not against a particular post nor they have undergone through a recruitment process for their
present assignment. The posts are not sanctioned nor is there any approval from the Finance Department. No exercise
by the workmen has ever been done to identify the requirement of the posts. No special budget is sanctioned for such
deployment. Their claim of regularization and permanence in service is hit by the Apex Courts judgment in State of
Karnataka Vs. Uma Devi (2006) 1 SCC 1.
After having heard the Ld. Counsel for the parties to the industrial dispute on the application meant to seek interim
relief in the nature and terms of payment of wages to the claimants as workmen and to issue suitable direction if any
to the management, this Industrial Tribunal proceeds as under-
DISCUSSIONS
The Hon’ble High Court in order dated Jan 24, 2024 has directed the workmen/ claimants to approach the CGIT
seeking interim relief and has also been pleased to direct the CGIT to decide the dispute in relation to the entitlement
of the claimants (Petitioner before the Hon’ble High Court) for the grant of any interim relief as expeditiously as
possible in accordance with law.
INCIDENTAL POWER OF THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT TO GRANT
INTERIM RELIEF OF INJUNCTION
In this regard the judgement of the Apex Court of India delivered in Hindustan Liver Ltd. Vs. Ashok Vishnu Kate
and ors. Reported (1995) 6 SCC 326 AIR 1996 Supreme Court 285. It is held that the Central Government
Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court will have the power to grant injunction as an incidental power. The concerned
Labour Court should meticulously scan the allegations in the complaint and if necessary, get the necessary
investigation made in the light of such complaint and only when very strong prima facie case is made out by the
complainant appropriate interim orders intercepting the complained order. Such order should not be asked for mere
askance by the Labour Courts.
Before to go further in the discussions it would also be pertinent to understand the word prime facie referred in the
above judgement of the Apex Court. Prima facie is a term that translates to “at first sight” or “Based on first
impression”. The phrase “Prima Facie” is used to describe a fact are presumption that is sufficient to be regarded as
true unless otherwise rebutted or disproved. In law, it can refer to either evidence that is regarded plausible but
susceptible to refutation or a stage in pre trial proceeding in which it is assessed whether the plaintiff/complainant has
a sufficiently plausible case to go to trial. In others words prime facie is a legal term or a legal claim which is made
when the plaintiff/complainant has enough evidence to proceed with a trial on the basis of which if he is given
opportunity to prove them and if succeeding in proving them a possible decree are award may be in his favour.
In the instant matter of Industrial dispute which is regarding claim of regularization and permanence in employment
on the basis of prolonged continuous engagement of the claimants as workmen on the posts they held under the
industrial dispute Act. A Complaint under section 33 of the Industrial dispute Act is also pending before this tribunal
complaining the interruption in terms and conditions as well as the status of the claimants despite the dispute had
already been raised before the competent authority of the Labour Department and also in disobedience of his
restraining order to not to disturb services of workmen and also in disobedience of the order of the Hon’ble High
Court not to interfere with the terms and conditions and not to precipitate the workmen in contravention of mandatory
provision of section 33. Interim application with prayer to issue directions to the management is moved on behalf of
the claimants/workmen that they should be directed to continue with the payment of wages at the rate they lastly
drawn during the pendency of the dispute raised initially before the conciliation officer of the labour department,
before the High Court and presently before this industrial tribunal. The occasion to move such a prayer accrued to the
claimants by virtue of the order of the management terminating their services in blatant violation of the mandatory
prohibition under section 33, and in disobedience orders of the High Court Hon’ble Justice J.S. Khehar in the case of
Subrata Roy Sahara V. Union of India reported in (2014) 8 SCC 470 at Para 185.2 laid down that-
“Disobedience of orders of a court strikes at the very root of the rule of law on which the judicial system rests.
Judicial orders are bound to be obeyed at all costs. Howsoever grave the effect may be, is no answer for
noncompliance of a judicial order. Judicial orders cannot be permitted to be circumvented”.
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1095
The roots and origin of concept of interim/interlocutory order in the Indian context can be raised from the provision of
order 39 rule 1,2 and 3 CPC, which are repository powers to grant interim relief of temporary injunction. The
industrial tribunal cum labour Court exercises a quasi judicial function in adjudicating the industrial dispute referred
to or brought before it but, the adjudication presupposes the tribunal to proceed in judicial manner and discretion.
Supreme Court of India has also propounded the same principal in Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. Vs. Hindustan
Liver Ltd. (1999) 7 SCC 1, 13, 14 AIR 1999 Supreme Court 3105, by holding and enumerating the broad parameters
that should govern the judicial discretion in passing of interim/interlocutory/temporary orders by Indian Cour. In Para
24 of the said judgement it is held;
“We, however, think it fit to note hereinabove certain specific considerations in the matter of grant of the
interlocutory injunction, the basic being non-expression of opinion as to the merits of the matter by the court,
since the issue of grant of injunction, usually, is at the earliest possible stage so far as the time-frame is
concerned. The other considerations which ought to weigh with the court hearing the application or petition
for the grant of injunction are as below:
I.
Extent of damages being an adequate remedy.
II.
Protect the plaintiff’s interest for violation of his rights through, however, having regard to the
injury that may be suffered by the defendants by reason therefor.
III.
The Courts while dealing with the matter ought not to ignore the factum of the strength of one
party’s case is stronger than the other’s.
IV.
No fixed rules or notions ought to be had in the matter of grant of the injunction but on the facts and
circumstances of each case the relief being kept flexible.
V.
The issue is to be looked at from the point of view as to whether on the refusal of the injunction the
plaintiff would suffer irreparable loss and injury keeping in view the strength of the parties’ case.
VI.
Balance of convenience even if there is a serious question or prima facie case in support of the
grant.
VII.
Whether the grant or refusal of the injunction will adversely affect the interest of the general public
which can or cannot be compensated otherwise.”
An Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court has the incidental power to pass an order granting interim relief to the
claimant until the passing of the final award, as already settled by the Apex Court in Hindustan Lever Ltd. vs. Ashok
Vishnu Kate (Supra) under Section 10(4) and Section 2(b) of the Act. Section 10(4) and Section 2(b) of the Act are
respectively reproduced hereunder for the purpose of easy reference and smoothness in further discussions-
“Section 10 (4) “Where in an order referring an industrial dispute to {a labour Court, Tribunal or National
Tribunal} under this section or in a subsequent order, the appropriate Government has specified the points of dispute
for adjudication, {the Labour Court or the Tribunal or the National Tribunal, as the case may be,} shall confine its
adjudication to those points and matters incidental thereto.”
Section 2 (b) “award” means an interim or a final determination of any industrial dispute or of any question relating
thereto by any Labour Court, Industrial Tribunal or National Industrial Tribunal and includes an arbitration award
made under section 10 A”;
The words “…and matters incidental thereto…” were explained by the Supreme Court in the case titled
“Management of Hotel Imperial Vs. Hotel Workers Union,” AIR 1959 Supreme Court 1342, which suggests that
there is no bar for an industrial tribunal to grant interim relief. It further suggests that ordinarily, the interim relief
should not be the whole relief that the party would receive if they succeed finally. Paragraphs 21 and 22 of the above
judgement are reproduced hereunder with great regard-
“Para 21. After a dispute is referred to the tribunal under section 10 of the Act, it is enjoined on it by section
15 to bold its proceeding expeditiously and on the conclusion thereof submit its award to the appropriate
government. An “award” us defined in section 2 (b) of the Act as meaning “an Interim or final determination
by an industrial Tribunal of any industrial dispute or of any question relating thereto. “where an order
referring and specifying the points of dispute for adjudication, the tribunal has to confine its adjudication to
those points and matters incidental thereto; (Section 10(4). It is urged on behalf of the appellants that the
tribunal in these cases had to confine itself to adjudicating on the points referred and that as the question of
interim relief till the decision of the tribunal with respect to the same matter would be a matter incidental
thereto under section 10 (4) and need not be specifically referred in terms to the tribunal. Thus interim relief
where it is admissible can be granted as a matter incidental to the main question referred to the tribunal
without being itself referred in express terms. The next question is as to how the tribunal should proceed in the
matter if it decides to grant interim relief. The definition of the word ‘award’ shows that it can be either an
interim or final determination either of the whole of the dispute referred to the tribunal or of any question
1096
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
relating thereto. Thus it is open to the tribunal to give an award about the entire dispute at the end of all
proceedings. This will be final determination of the industrial dispute referred to it. It is also open to the
tribunal to make an award about some other still remain to be decided . This will be an interim determination
of any question relating thereto. In either case it will have to be published as required by section 17. Such
awards are however not in the nature of interim for they decide the industrial dispute or some question
relating thereto. Interim relief, on the other hand, is granted under the power conferred on the tribunal under
section 10(4) with respect to matters incidental to the points of dispute for adjudication.
In the light of discussions made hereinabove in preceding Para’s, it would be pertinent to note that industrial
dispute preferred to this tribunal by appropriate government is with regard to relief of regularization and
pending the same for adjudication when terms and conditions of the services were materially interfere by the
management consequent thereupon a complaint of workmen/claimants under section 33 A of the Act are before
the tribunal to finally decide and pass award the instant application in hand meant for interim relief which
have been referred in one of the preceding Para is to be decided by the tribunal on the principal and sliant in
order 33 rule 1, 2 & 3 of the CPC which requires the grant of refusal of the interim exemption on considering
the three essential ingredients whether existing concurrently. These three ingredient of prima facie case
irreparable loss and balance of convenience.”
Prima facie case of the workmen/claimants as pleaded in their statement of claim and the complaint under section 33
A of the Act is to be read in consonance with the documentary evidences. Since from the very inception in the present
industrial dispute firstly before the labour authorities namely the conciliation officer and also in various writ
proceedings before the Hon’ble High Court and then before this industrial tribunal, there is a consistent plea that the
concerned workmen have been working in the establishment of the management performing their duties as Peon-cum-
Chowkidar in various offices/voter centres of the management. The date of engagement/deployment or employment
of the workmen concerned is unequivocally referred to in a chart submitted by them propagating their industrial
Dispute at various forums of law, some of them working since a considerable long period for more than one or two
decades. This is noteworthy that the initial engagement of such workmen and their performing works on different
assignments from time to time in the departments of GNCTD is not denied even admitted in so many words in their
reply submitted before all those forums of law. The tribunal has taken into notice that while the initial engagement of
the claimants in various works during a long span of time, performance of work by such claimants under the direct
control supervision and instruction of the competent authorities in various departments of the GNCTD. There is no
explanation on the part of management that why their services are kept temporary for such a long period in violation
of law prescribed by the Industrial Dispute Act, The contract labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1971 as well as
various standing orders issued by them in consonance with the provision of Industrial establishment standing orders
Act etc. This is also admitted by the management that the services of the present claimants/workmen were being taken
and utilized regularly without any extraordinary break in their continuity of service as contract labours paying them
wages in accordance with rate prescribed under the minimum wages Act prevailing at the relevant times. Then also,
the management seems to argue for the sake to oppose their claim before a forum of law that they are not workmen as
defined and the management of GNCTD is excluded from the definition of industry as defined the under the Industrial
Dispute Act, 1947.
In the above context section 2(j) as amended up to date is being quoted hereunder:
“Industry” means any business, trade, undertaking, manufacture or calling of employers and includes any
calling, service, employment, handicraft, or industrial occupation or avocation or workmen;”
Likewise the definition of workmen as given under section 2 (s) is quoted hereunder:
“Workman” means any person (including an apprentice) employed in any industry to do any manual,
unskilled, skilled, technical, operational, clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward, whether the terms
of employment be express or implied, and for the purposes of any proceeding under this act in relation to an
industrial dispute, includes any such person who has been dismissed, discharged or retrenched in connection
with, or as a consequence of, that dispute, or whose dismissal, discharge or retrenchment has led to that
dispute, but does not include any such person
I.
Who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950(46 of 1950), or the Navy Act,
1957 (62 of 1957); or
II.
Who is employed in the police serives or as an officer or other employee of a prison; or
III.
Who is employed mainly in a managerial or administrative capacity; or
IV.
Who, being employed in a supervisory capacity, draws wages exceeding ten thousand rupees per mensem or
exercises, either by the nature of the duties attached to the office or by reason of the powers vested in him,
funtions, mainly of a managerial nature.
Historically, the definition of the term “Industry” under the Act is interpreted in the case of Bangalore Water Supply
and Sewerage Board V. A. Rajappa reported in AIR 1978 Supreme Court 845 wherein Hon’ble Supreme Court has
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1097
given interpretation of the word “Industry” in the widest scope and “Sovereign Functions” within a limited orbit,
Industrial adjudication as influenced by the aforesaid precepts and enterprise cannot therefore be excluded from the
ambit of the Act merely because of the individual predilection of a judge. A Study of the judgments of the Supreme
Court from Banerjee to Jai Bir Singh brings to the fore a variety of cases where the court had to decide on the
questions of ambit of ‘Industry’ under the Act. The activities which engaged the attention of the court on the issue of
‘Industry’ mere those of municipalities, local bodies, government run hospitals, educational institutions, liberal
professions, clubs, state and central government departments, etc. and inclusive. It is in two parts. The first part lays
down that “industry” means any business, trade, undertaking, manufacture or calling of employers” and the second
part specifies that it ‘includes’ any calling service, employment, handicraft or industrial occupation or avocation of
workmen.” Thus, while the first part defines it from standpoint of the employer, the second part visualises it from that
of the employees. Discussing both these parts, the supreme court, In Madras Gymkhana club employees union V.
Gymkhana club, attempted to keep the two notions concerning employers and employees apart and expressed the
view that denotation of the term ‘industry’ is to be found in the first part relating to the employers and the connotation
of the term is intended to include the second part relating to workmen. Later on, the court in Safdarjung Hospital V.
Kuldip Singh Sethi held that the definition had to be read as a whole and when so read it denoted a collective
enterprise in which employers and employees were associated. It did not exist by the employees alone. It existed only
when there was a relationship between employers and employees, the former engaged in ‘business, trade,
undertaking, manufacture or calling of employers’ and the latter engaged in ‘calling, service employment, handicraft
or industrial occupation or avocation’.
In the context of the present matter the issue raised by the management before this court that to the above effect that
GNCTD are discharging governmental functions and therefore immune from the definition of industry, Industrial
Dispute and application of Industrial Dispute Act over them in strict sense because they are discharging sovereign or
legal function. The above issue raised by the management stands answered as it held by the Bangalore water supply
case (Supra) according to which ‘Industry’ as define section 2(j) has wide import (a) Where (i) Systematic activity,
(ii) organized by
co-operation between employer and employee, (the direct and substantial element is chimerical) (iii) for the
production and/or distribution of goods and services calculated to satisfy human wants and wishes (not spiritual or
religions but inclusive of material things or services geared to celestial bliss e.g. making, on a large scale, Prasad or
food), Prima facie, there is an ‘Industry’ in that enterprise.
(b) Absence of profit motive or gainful objective is irrelevant, be the venture in the public, joint private or other
sector.
(c) The true focus is functional and the decisive test is the nature of the activity with special emphasis on the
employer-employee relations.
(d) If the organization is a trade or business it does not cease to be one because of philanthropy animating the
undertaking.
Although Section 2(j) uses words of the widest amplitude in its two limbs their meaning cannot be magnified to
overreach itself. Further the Supreme Court in above case propounded a working principle called a triple test number.
(i) There should be systematic activity. (ii) Organized b co-operation between employer or employee. (iii) For the
production and/or distribution of goods and services calculated to satisfy human wants and wishes. It is further
emphasized that industry does not include spiritual or religious services geared to celestial bliss.
Therefore, the consequences of the decision in the above case are that profession, Clubs, Education Institution,
Cooperatives, Research Institutes, Charitable Projects and other Adventures if they fulfill the triple test stated above
cannot be assumpted from the scope of section 2(j) of the Act.
In State of U.P V. Jai Bir Singh 2017 (3) SCC 311, it was held that a caveat has to be entered on confining
‘Sovereign Functions’ to the traditional so described as ‘inalienable functions’ comparable to those performed by a
monarch, a ruler or a non-democratic government. The learned judges in the Banglore Water Supply a Sewerage
Board case seem to have confined only such sovereign functions outside the purview of ‘industry’ which can be
termed strictly as constitutional functions of three wings of the state i.e., executive, legislature and judiciary. The
concept of sovereignty in a constitutional democracy is different from the traditional concept of sovereignty which is
confined to ‘law and order’,’defense’ ‘law making’ and ‘justice dispensation’. In a democracy governed by the
Constitutional obligations contained in the Directive Principles of the state policy in part- IV of the Constitution of
India. From the point of view, wherever the government undertakes public welfare activities in discharge of its
constitutional obligations, as provided in part- IV of the constitutions, such activities should be treated as activities in
discharge of sovereign functions falling outside the purview of ‘industry’. Whether employees employed in such
welfare activities of the government require protection, apart from the constitutional rights conferred on them, may be
a subject of separate legislature but for that reason. Such governmental activities cannot be brought within the fold of
industrial law by giving an undue expansive and wide meaning to the words used in the definition of industry.
In Union of India V. Raju Kumar Shah and with other similar writ petitions Hon’ble High Court reported in 2020
1098
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
SCC Online Delhi 370 observed in Para 64 and 65 which are being quoted here under;
“Para 64 . The “Predominant nature” test, thereby, stands reiterated, but even more significant in the
reference, by the Supreme Court, the “Defence of the Country, the raising of armed forces, making peace or
waging war, foreign affairs, the powers to acquire and retain territory, etc,”Included , within the concluding
“etc” in the afore-extracted passage from the judgment of the Supreme Court, would be functions which are
similar, in character, to those mentioned earlier, i.e., defence of the country, raising of Armed forces, making
peace, waging war, foreign affairs, and the power to acquire and retain territory.
Para 65. Apparently, therefore, only such functions may be regarded as “inalienably sovereign”, as could
not, constitutionally and at any point of time, ever be delegated to a private authority, as they are incapable
of being discharged by private persons. The fact that, in view of the statutory dispensations, existing at a
particular point of time, the function is required to be discharged by the Government, or by a governmental
authority, would not, ipso facto, be sufficient to Characterize the functions as “Sovereign”. Functions such
as making peace, waging war, legislation, maintenance of public law and order, and eminent domain and
acquisition of territory for public purposes, are constitutionally and inalienably, sovereign and are
incapable of being delegated to any private authority, at any fore cable point of time. Such functions, alone,
would be eligible to the regarded as “inalienably sovereign”. So as to justify exemption from the definition
of “Industry” in the ID Act.
On the basis of above discussion this tribunal is of opinion opinion that irrespective of its legal functions the GNCTD
is discharging some other works which cannot be said inalienable function like the works of the present
claimants/workmen were discharging under the direct control and supervision of Competent Authorities, Officers and
Employees in various department of GNCTD they are workmen as defined under section 2(s) quoted here in above in
preceding Para in relation to the works having been discharged by them and the
management is an employer as defined in section 2(g) of the Act.
Section 2(g) “employer” means-
(i) In relation to any industry carried on by or under the authority of any department of [the central
Government or a state Government,] the authority prescribed in this behalf, or where no authority is
prescribed, the head of the department
(ii) In relation to an industry carried on by or on behalf of a local authority, the chief executive officer of
that authority;
Therefore, the pleadings of the parties and evidences on record collectively tend to establish that the management of
GNCTD is industry in relation to the work assigned to the present claimants/workmen during their engagement as
such from time to time is an ‘Industry’ and there clearly exists relation of employer and employee between
management and the claimants under the definition given in the Industrial Dispute Act. Likewise, the claimants
undoubtedly come within the ambit of definition of workmen as defined under the Act. Therefore, the dispute as
raised before the Conciliation Officer appointed under the Industrial Dispute Act and referred to this tribunal by the
appropriate government is prima facie an industrial dispute as defined under section 2(k) of the Act. Section 2(k) is
being quoted here under for easy reference;
“Industrial dispute” means any dispute or difference between employers and employers, or between
employers and workmen, or between workmen and workmen, which is concerned with the employment or
non-employment or the terms of employment of with the conditions of labour, of any person;
When the claimants/workmen have successfully established the management an industry they are workmen therein
and engaged with in their services for a long even then admittedly they were kept as contractual workmen for a
considerably long duration, Prima facie they had been subjected to Unfair Labour Practice which is defined under
section 2 (ra) .“Unfair Labour Practice” means any of the practices specified in the fifth Schedule;
In the schedule of the Act the unfair labour practice is elaborated as “10. To employ workmen as “badlis”, casuals or
temporaries and to continue them as such for years, with the object of depriving them of the status and privileges of
permanent workmen.”
To deny the present claimants claim under the industrial dispute so as to thwart off their prima facie case the
management has posed the status of the present claimants illegally and irregularly employed in the various
departments of the GNCTD because they were volunteers under the Civil Defence Act for providing call out services
in the event of disasters if any in the State of Delhi and for that their services shall be treated as “NISHKAM
SEWA” if translated to English means” service for no valuable considerations”. Much vehemence is given on the
provision of the Civil Defence Act 1968 of which section 2(ab) and section 5 relating to appointment as member of
civil defence corps use words “any person” does not qualify such person to be a government servant necessarily it
keeps free any person from the public at large who is sprit fully volunteer themselves to contribute their services
without any expectation to be paid in lieu their of. The management has remained unsuccessful in establishing that in
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1099
lieu of they being a volunteer in civil defence were given appointment in various departments of GNCTD.
Management in arguments and written submission has also admitted that a person to be eligible for enrollment as
volunteer may be professing personally business, serving in private establishment or government service are involved
in any other activities who is willing and ready to volunteer himself in case of any disaster. Disaster like Firefighting,
Flood management, Earthquake Management and in exercise of right to Self Defence of himself or of any other’s
person or property. It means that the present employment of the claimants in various department of GNCTD has no
material connection with ending their call out duty as volunteer in civil defence. The management has clearly
admitted that the total no of 1,75,000 persons are enrolled as volunteers in Civil Defence. Only some of them to say a
nominal percentage of them about 10% are working in the various departments of GNCTD. It clearly means that a
government employee/workmen or any individual from the different field of life activities may be a volunteer in the
Civil Defence Corps but inverse is not possible that every person who is in government service is necessarily be
treated as volunteer unless he himself opted to be enrolled as such in civil defence corp. it is therefore established that
ending the call out services as volunteer in civil defence will automatically not enough to end the services of such
volunteer if he is in service of government in absence of law and rules in this regard with an employment in the
government department. Therefore, if call out services under the Civil Defence Act is terminated by the Civil Defence
Authorities prima facie it would not have effect on the status of a volunteer as employee or workmen of a department
in GNCTD.
The plea of claimants being a volunteer under the Civil Defence Act and therefore, they have no right to demand
regularization in services in their department the management of GNCTD seems to be a veil to cover the act of
illegally terminating the services of present claimants/workmen and also to avoid the consequences of their act of
Unfair Labour Practice.
The dispute as to the regularization was raised before the management but when they did not pay heed and whisper
threats to terminate the services the same was raised before the conciliation officer on …… The Conciliation Officer
in the matter restrain the management not to disturb in continuous in service of the workmen till the adjudication of
the dispute even when the workmen apprehended that the management is going to terminate the services in GNCTD
departments in the garb of termination of call out services in Civil Defence they immediately restup to the high court.
Hon’ble high court also restrained the GNCTD for not precipitating the services of workmen till the final decision
over the industrial dispute the management cleverly enough stopped taking the work from the present workmen and
even published and advertisement to fill up vacancies expected to be all vacant from ousting the present claimants
from their services. They apprehension of the claimants/workmen is reasonable and their expectation from the
tribunal to direct management for claimant of their wages is lawful and they are entitled to get such relief from this
tribunal. The prima facie case of the claimants/workmen is fully established.
Irreparable loss the workmen/claimants who were depending on their wages for feeding their families and to
discharge their liabilities in day to day life as they were in various department of GNCTD who were utilizing their
services since long for more than one and two decades as the case may be were all of sudden without their fault
stopped from discharging their duties assigned to them and from getting their wages in view of their valuable
services. Loss of means of livelihood is an irreparable loss.
Balance of convenience-The plea of management that there is no vacancy and sanctioned post with regard to the
work of present claimant/workmen said to be discharged in the various department of GNCTD and there is no
financial approval there for , stands belied by recent action of the GNCTD itself as they have published an
advertisement for recruitment of suitable persons on the posts upon which the present claimants/workmen were
working. The management has not explained and presented the rules, regulation or standing order if any before the
tribunal to show how the workmen/claimants were engaged in the services of the management without prior prior
sanction of government and availability of budget. They have also not cited incident of any unlawful activities on the
part of present workmen/claimant nor they have stated what action has been taken by them against such officer of the
management who had employed claimants/workmen for such a extraordinary long period of one or two decades.
Therefore, irreparable loss occasioned to the workmen/ claimants by the act of management but the management itself
is not going to suffer, if the workmen/claimants are retained in service till the final adjudication of the dispute.
The Tribunal is of opinion that the three essential ingredients for grant of interim relief in the circumstances of the
case both in the nature of prohibition as well as mandatory direction are well established as against the case of
claimant/workmen set forth in their application against the move of management of taking fresh hands in place of the
workmen as they had issued a tender for engaging fresh hands.
Injunction and direction as interim order
There is no doubt that the management, being the appointing authority, is competent to terminate the service of the
workmen, but subject to compliance with the law and the procedure prescribed under the Industrial Disputes Act.
Under section 25F of I.D. Act, Retrenchment, as defined in section 2(oo) of the Act, amounts to termination of
service, but the inverse is not true. Every termination of service by the management is not retrenchment of the
workmen permissible under the Industrial Disputes Act.
It is not the case of the management that the services of the claimants as workmen were time-bound for any project
1100
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
work, bound to be terminated with the completion of the work.
It is also not the case of the management that they terminated the services of the workmen on any other grounds, such
as misconduct or their inability to discharge the duties assigned to them. The case put up before the tribunal on behalf
of the management relates to the ending of call-out duties of a volunteer under the Civil Defence Act, 1968, but how
and in what manner the end of call-out duties of a volunteer who is also an employee in the department of
management is materially connected to, or adversely affects the present workmen/claimants in the termination of their
services also.
The claim of regularisation is to be adjudicated after taking oral and documentary evidence on record with regard to
the nature of the appointment/engagement of the workmen, the continuation of their services, the utilisation of their
services by management, the standing orders governing the engagement of workmen concerned, as well as the alleged
termination of service of the workmen concerned by management. With the subject of the final award, the complaint
under section 33 is also to be decided on the basis of evidence placed and brought on record by the parties to the
industrial dispute. In both matters, the essence of the subject matter is the continuity of service. After raising the
dispute before the Conciliation Officer, section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act comes into operation, which
mandatorily restricts the management from terminating the services of workmen without prior permission of the
concerned authority or tribunal.
In view of the above, Jaipur Zila Sarkari Bhumi Vikas Bank vs. Ram Gopal Sharma, AIR 1994 (6) SCC 522, the
Constitution Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that if prior approval is not granted under section 33(2)(b) of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the order of dismissal becomes ineffective from the date it was passed or from the
date of non-approval of the order of dismissal, and the want of approval under section 33(2)(b) renders the order of
dismissal ineffective.
The alleged termination of services of the workmen concerned is ineffective and inoperative and shall be treated as if
it was not passed at all. Therefore, the tribunal hereby restrains the management/Chief Electoral Officer from
divesting the workmen concerned from their wages equal to the rate of wages last disbursed by the management to
them. The management is further directed to keep the vacancies reserved for the present workmen/claimants during
the pendency of the present industrial dispute and the complaint under section 33 moved therein.
The office is directed to send a copy of the order in due procedure of law under section 17A for compliance and
further action.
17.10.2024
Justice VIKAS KUNVAR SRIVASTAVA, Retired Judge, Allahabad High Court,
Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 402.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,केन्रीय
सरकार मिाजनिेिक, भारतीय पुरातत्व सवेक्षण, िनपथ, नई दिल्ली; मुख्य अिीक्षण उद्यानजवि्, भारतीय पुरातत्व
सवेक्षण, उद्यान िाखा, आगरा (उ.प्र.); जनिेिक, भारतीय पुरातत्व सवेक्षण, केन्रीय भवन, लखनऊ संभाग, रेिीडेंसी
गाडचन, लखनऊ, के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री सुखवीर वसंि, कामगार , द्वारा -मिासजर्व, अजखल भारतीय
पुरातत्व सवेक्षण मििूर यूजनयन (इंटक), के बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण- सि-श्रम
न्यायालय, लखनऊ पंर्ाट(संिभच संख्या 55/2015) को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै,प्रकाजित करती िै िो केन्रीय
सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 27.02.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-42012/97/2015-आईआर(डीयू)]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 6th March, 2025
S.O. 402.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 55/2015) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum
Labour Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to
The Director General, Archaeological Survey of India, Janpath, New Delhi; The Chief Superintending
Horticulturist, Archaeological Survey of India, Garden Branch, AGRA (U.P.);The Director, Archaeological
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1101
Survey of India, Kendriya Bhawan, Lucknow Division, Residency Garden, Lucknow, and Shri Sukhvir Singh,
Worker, through- The General Secretary, All India Archaeological Survey Mazdoor Union (INTUC), which
was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 27.02.2025.
[No. L-42012/97-2015-IR(DU)]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW
PRESENT
JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
PRESIDING OFFICER
I.D. No. 55/2015
Ref. No. L-42012/97/2015-IR(DU) dated: 23.06.2015
BETWEEN
Sh Sukhvir Singh S/o Sh Mahesh Chandra, C/o General Secretary, All India Archaeological Survey Mazdoor Union
(INTUC), 30C/33/3, Tulsi Nagar, Govar Chawki Tajganj, AGRA(U.P.)-282001
AND
1. The Director General, Archaeological Survey of India, Janpath, New Delhi-110011
2. The Chief Superintending Horticulturist, Archeological Survey of India, Garden Branch, C.H. Office, Taj Mahal
East Gate, AGRA (U.P.) - 282001
3. The Director, Archaeological Survey of India, Kendriya Bhawan, Lucknow Division, Residency Garden, Lucknow
- 226001
AWARD
By order No. L-42012/97/2015-IR(DU) dated: 23.06.2015 the present industrial dispute has been referred for
adjudication in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) by the Central Government, with following schedule:
"क्त्या प्रबंिन भारतीय पुरातत्व सवेक्षण द्वारा श्री सुखवीर वसंि पुत्र श्री मिेि र्ंि को दिनांक 01.01.2014 को नौकरी से
जनकाल दिया िाना न्यायाजर्त एवं वैि िै? यदि निीं तो कामगार दकस राित को पाने का िकिार िै?"
Accordingly, an industrial dispute No. 55/2015 has been registered.
On 04.08.2015 claimant filed claim statement supported by an affidavit.
Facts stated in the claim petition are in brief that claimant worked as casual worker with the respondent w.e.f.
02.08.2011 to 31.12.2013; however without following the provision of retrenchment as provided under section 25(F)
of the Industrial Dispute Act 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) his services were dispensed on 01.01.2014.
On behalf of the respondent statement of defense filed on 10.05.2016 in which preliminary objection also taken by the
respondent.
Thereafter, workman filed rejoinder on 09.08.2016 and evidence in support of his case vide affidavit dated
31.07.2017.
After filing of the evidence on affidavit, the workman did not turn up for his cross- examination, in spite of several
opportunities given to workman.
Accordingly heard learned counsel for respondent and gone through the records.
In view of the above said facts the claimant/workman has not field any rejoinder/evidence in support of his case on
affidavit, in spite of several opportunities given to him and taking into consideration the law as laid by the Hon'ble
High Court in the case of V. K. Raj Industries v. Labour Court (1) and others 1981 (29) FLR 194 as under:
“It is well settled that if a party challenges the legality of an order, the burden lies upon him to prove
illegality of the order and if no evidence is produced the party invoking jurisdiction of the Court must fail.
Whenever a workman raises a dispute challenging the validity of the termination of service if is imperative
for him to file written statement before the Industrial Court setting out grounds on which the order is
1102
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
challenged and he must also produce evidence to prove his case. If the workman fails to appear or to file
written statement or produce evidence, the dispute referred by the State Government cannot be answered in
favour of the workman and he would not be entitled to any relief.”
In the case of M/s Uptron Powertronics Employees’ Union, Ghaziabad through its Secretary v. Presiding Officer,
Labour Court (II), Ghaziabad and others 2008 (118) FLR 1164 Hon’ble Allahabad High Court has held as under:
“The law has been settled by the Apex Court in case of Shanker Chakravarti v. Britannia Biscuit Co. Ltd.,
V.K. Raj Industries v. Labour Court and Ors., Airtech Private Limited v. State of U.P. and Ors. 1984 (49)
FLR 38 and Meritech India Ltd. v. State of U.P. and Ors. 1996 FLR that in the absence of any evidence led
by or on behalf of the workman the reference is bound to be answered by the court against the workman. In
such a situation it is not necessary for the employers to lead any evidence at all. The obligation to lead
evidence to establish an allegation made by a party is on the party making the allegation. The test would be,
who would fail if no evidence is led.”
And by the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the case of District Administrative Committee, U.P. P.A.C.C.S.C.
Services v. Secretary-cum-G.M. District Co-operative Bank Ltd. 2010 (126) FLR 519; wherein it has been held as
under:
“The submission is that even if the petitioner failed to lead the evidence, burden was on the shoulders of the
respondent to prove the termination order as illegal. He was required to lead evidence first which he failed.
A perusal of the impugned award also does not show that any evidence either oral or documentary was led
by the respondent. In the case of no evidence, the reference has to be dismissed.”
As the workman has not filed any statement of claim/oral/documentary evidence, so the present case is liable to be
dismissed.
For the foregoing reasons, the case is dismissed and; and the workman is not entitled for any relief.
Award as above.
Lucknow.
Justice ANIL KUMAR, Presiding Officer
17th February, 2025
नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 403.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,केन्रीय
सरकार मिाजनिेिक, भारतीय पुरातत्व सवेक्षण, िनपथ, नई दिल्ली; मुख्य अिीक्षण उद्यानजवि्, भारतीय पुरातत्व
सवेक्षण, उद्यान िाखा, आगरा (उ.प्र.); जनिेिक, भारतीय पुरातत्व सवेक्षण, केन्रीय भवन, लखनऊ संभाग, रेिीडेंसी
गाडचन, लखनऊ, के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री िरीि रािपूत, कामगार, द्वारा -मिासजर्व, अजखल भारतीय
पुरातत्व सवेक्षण मििूर यूजनयन (इंटक), के बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण- सि-श्रम
न्यायालय, लखनऊ पंर्ाट (संिभच संख्या 54/2015) को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै,प्रकाजित करती िै िो
केन्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 27.02.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-42012/96/2015-आईआर(डीयू)]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 6th March, 2025
S.O. 403.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 54/2015) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum
Labour Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to
The Director General, Archaeological Survey of India, Janpath, New Delhi ; The Chief Superintending
Horticulturist, Archaeological Survey of India, Garden Branch, AGRA (U.P.) ;The Director, Archaeological
Survey of India, Kendriya Bhawan, Lucknow Division, Residency Garden, Lucknow, and Shri Harish Rajput,
Worker, through- The General Secretary, All India Archaeological Survey Mazdoor Union (INTUC), which
was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 27.02.2025.
[No. L-42012/96/2015-IR(DU)]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1103
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW
PRESENT
JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
PRESIDING OFFICER
I.D. No. 54/2015
Ref. No. L-42012/96/2015-IR(DU) dated: 23.06.2015
BETWEEN
Sh Harish Rajput S/o Sh Parasram Rajput, C/o Sh Ashok Kumar Singh, General Secretary, All India Archaeological
Survey Mazdoor Union (INTUC), 30C/33/3, Tulsi Nagar, Govar Chawki Tajganj, AGRA(U.P.)-282001
AND
1. The Director General, Archaeological Survey of India, Janpath, New Delhi-110011
2. The Chief Superintending Horticulturist, Archaeological Survey of India, Garden Branch, C.H. Office, Taj Mahal
East Gate, AGRA (U.P.) - 282001
3. The Director, Archaeological Survey of India, Kendriya Bhawan, Lucknow Division, Residency Garden, Lucknow
- 226001
AWARD
By order No. L-42012/96/2015-IR(DU) dated: 23.06.2015 the present industrial dispute has been referred for
adjudication in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) by the Central Government, with following schedule:
"क्त्या प्रबंिन भारतीय पुरातत्व सवेक्षण द्वारा श्री सुखवीर वसंि पुत्र श्री मिेि र्ंि को दिनांक 01.01.2014 को नौकरी से
जनकाल दिया िाना न्यायाजर्त एवं वैि िै? यदि निीं तो कामगार दकस राित को पाने का िकिार िै?"
Accordingly, an industrial dispute No. 55/2015 has been registered.
On 04.08.2015 claimant filed claim statement supported by an affidavit.
Facts stated in the claim petition are in brief that claimant worked as casual worker with the respondent w.e.f.
02.08.2011 to 31.12.2013; however without following the provision of retrenchment as provided under section 25(F)
of the Industrial Dispute Act 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) his services were dispensed on 01.01.2014.
On behalf of the respondent statement of defense filed on 10.05.2016 in which preliminary objection also taken by the
respondent.
Thereafter, workman filed rejoinder on 09.08.2016 and evidence in support of his case vide affidavit dated
31.07.2017.
After filing of the evidence on affidavit, the workman did not turn up for his cross- examination, in spite of several
opportunities given to workman.
Accordingly heard learned counsel for respondent and gone through the records.
In view of the above said facts the claimant/workman has not field any rejoinder/evidence in support of his case on
affidavit, in spite of several opportunities given to him and taking into consideration the law as laid by the Hon'ble
High Court in the case of V. K. Raj Industries v. Labour Court (1) and others 1981 (29) FLR 194 as under:
“It is well settled that if a party challenges the legality of an order, the burden lies upon him to prove
illegality of the order and if no evidence is produced the party invoking jurisdiction of the Court must fail.
Whenever a workman raises a dispute challenging the validity of the termination of service if is imperative
for him to file written statement before the Industrial Court setting out grounds on which the order is
challenged and he must also produce evidence to prove his case. If the workman fails to appear or to file
written statement or produce evidence, the dispute referred by the State Government cannot be answered in
favour of the workman and he would not be entitled to any relief.”
In the case of M/s Uptron Powertronics Employees’ Union, Ghaziabad through its Secretary v. Presiding Officer,
Labour Court (II), Ghaziabad and others 2008 (118) FLR 1164 Hon’ble Allahabad High Court has held as under:
“The law has been settled by the Apex Court in case of Shanker Chakravarti v. Britannia Biscuit Co. Ltd.,
1104
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
V.K. Raj Industries v. Labour Court and Ors., Airtech Private Limited v. State of U.P. and Ors. 1984 (49)
FLR 38 and Meritech India Ltd. v. State of U.P. and Ors. 1996 FLR that in the absence of any evidence led
by or on behalf of the workman the reference is bound to be answered by the court against the workman. In
such a situation it is not necessary for the employers to lead any evidence at all. The obligation to lead
evidence to establish an allegation made by a party is on the party making the allegation. The test would be,
who would fail if no evidence is led.”
And by the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the case of District Administrative Committee, U.P. P.A.C.C.S.C.
Services v. Secretary-cum-G.M. District Co-operative Bank Ltd. 2010 (126) FLR 519; wherein it has been held as
under:
“The submission is that even if the petitioner failed to lead the evidence, burden was on the shoulders of the
respondent to prove the termination order as illegal. He was required to lead evidence first which he failed.
A perusal of the impugned award also does not show that any evidence either oral or documentary was led
by the respondent. In the case of no evidence, the reference has to be dismissed.”
As the workman has not filed any statement of claim/oral/documentary evidence, so the present case is liable to be
dismissed.
For the foregoing reasons, the case is dismissed and; and the workman is not entitled for any relief.
Award as above.
Lucknow.
Justice ANIL KUMAR, Presiding Officer
17th February, 2025
Let two copies of this award be sent to the Ministry for publication.
नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 404.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,केन्रीय
सरकार मुख्य पोस्ट्ट मास्ट्टर, सामान्य िररयाणा, अंबाला; वररष्ठ डाकघर अिीक्षक, गुरुिाम मंडल, गुरुिाम, िररयाणा;
उप-डाकपाल, उप-डाकघर कोिली, जिला रेवाड़ी, के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री अिोक कुमार, कामगार, के
बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण-सि-श्रम न्यायालय-2, र्ंडीगढ़, पंर्ाट (संिभच
संख्या 08/2017)को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै, प्रकाजित करती िै िो केन्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ
06.03.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-42025-07-2025-आईआर(डीयू)-40]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 6th March, 2025
S.O. 404.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 08/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum
Labour Court-2, Chandigarh, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation
to The Chief Post Master, General Haryana, Ambala; Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Gurugram
Division, Gurugram, Haryana; Sub Postmaster, Sub Post Office Koshli, Distt. Rewari, and Shri Ashok Kumar,
Worker, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 06.03.2025.
[No. L-42025-07-2025-IR(DU)-40]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
In the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court-II, Chandigarh (Presided over by Mr.
Kamal Kant).
ID No.08/2017
Registered on:-05.03.2018
Ashok Kumar son of Shri Bharat Singh, R/o VPO Koshli, Distt. Rewari (Haryana).
----Applicant/Workman/Claimant
Versus
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1105
1.
The Chief Post Master, General Haryana, Ambala.
2.
Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Gurugram Division, Gurugram, Haryana.
3.
Sub Postmaster, Sub Post Office Koshli, Distt. Rewari.
----Respondents
Present:-
Sh. S C Gupta, Ld. Counsel for Workman.
Sh. Alankrit Bhardwaj, AR for Respondent No. 1 to 3.
Award : 13.01.2025
1.
The present application has been filed by Sh. Ashok Kumar under Section 2(A) of the Industrial Dispute
Act, 1947 (hereinafter called as ID Act) with a prayer to reinstate the applicant on the same post on which he was
working with continuity in service along with all consequential benefits from the date of termination i.e. 05.06.2017.
2.
Brief facts as stated by the applicant are that he was engaged as GDS packer by respondent no.3 w.e.f.
07.06.2010 till 11.03.2011 in sub post office Koshli. On 11.03.2011, one Sh. Ramesh Kumar was appointed on
permanent basis, but the said Ramesh Kumar never worked in the post office even for a day and the applicant was
again engaged by the sub post master. Thereafter, the workman was engaged @ salary of Rs.3000/- per month which
was revised from time to time and lastly the workman was getting Rs.9000/- per month. The workman remained
working with respondent no.3 w.e.f. 07.06.2010 to 05.06.2017 continuously without any break. The incumbent sub
post master kept assuring the applicant that his services would be made permanent and he would be paid full salary
and allowances as to be paid to the other permanent employees like the applicant with all benefits applicable to the
post as per the service conditions. The services of the applicant were terminated on 05.06.2017 without one month
notice or pay in lieu of notice and without payment of any retrenchment compensation, though the workman
completed 7 years continuous service. It is submitted that the workman has completed 240 days of working with the
management prior to the date of termination. The applicant has not alternate job and is unemployed from the date of
termination till date.
3. Against the illegal termination, the claimant raised issue before the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central),
Karnal (hereinafter called as ALC Karnal). However, the matter could not be settled. Hence this reference.
4. Notice of the application was given to the respondents who filed written statements raising several preliminary
objections, inter alia that this court has no jurisdiction as only competent Court with regard to redressal of grievances
and disabled employees of the Government of India is the Central Administrative Tribunal under the Administrative
Tribunals Act, 1985. On merit, it is stated that the claimant had worked as outsider Gramin Dak Sevak Branch Packer
at Kosli on 07.06.2010 to 30.06.2010 and was paid 2718/- for the said period due to promotion of Sh. Rajvir as
postmen and thereafter applicant worked from 09.04.2011 to 31.05.2011, 01.12.2011 to 31.01.2012 and 04.02.2012
to 01.05.2012 and thereafter, Sh. Rajesh Kumar was appointed on 02.05.2012 as a regular incumbent for the above
mentioned post and thereafter, sh. Ramesh Kumar resigned on 01.02.2014 and thereafter the said post was again
managed by engaging outsider GDS Packer Kosli by Sh. Ashok Kumar from 01.02.2014 to 30.04.2014, 02.07.2014
to 31.10.2014, 01.05.2015 to 30.06.2015, 01.10.2015 to 31.12.2015, 01.04.2016 to 31.05.2016, 01.07.2016 to
31.10.2016, 01.12.2016 to 31.01.2017 and lastly engaged after a gap on 01.03.2017 till 28.05.2017, for which he was
paid Rs.15,753/- per month and also paid @Rs.2295+ DA (as admissible from time to time) due to vacant post of
GDS Packer at Koshli. The applicant has unauthorized access to the attendance register and marked his attendance
illegally. It is also submitted that there was no need to give one month notice or retrenchment compensation as the
workman worked as outsider GDS on temporary/stop gap arrangement and is covered under the provisions of Section
2(00) (bb) of the ID Act. Remaining averments have been denied and it is prayed that claim of the applicant be
dismissed.
Evidence of the parties:-
5. In order to prove his case, applicant himself appeared and filed his affidavit WW1/A and closed his evidence on
10.05.2019. Thereafter, respondents have examined Sh. Jawahar Singh as MW1, who tender his affidavit as MW1/A
and thereafter, respondents closed their evidence on 18.10.2024 and the matter was fixed for arguments.
6. I have given due consideration to the arguments advanced by ld. counsel for both the parties.
Submissions of Applicant:
7. While arguing the case, ld. counsel for the applicant contended that the workman joined initially with respondent
no.3 on 07.06.2010 as GDS Packer and worked upto 11.03.2011. Thereafter, one Sh. Ramesh Kumar joined in place
of applicant on 11.03.2011, but Ramesh Kumar never worked in post office and applicant was again engaged by the
sub post master at salary of Rs.3000/- per month, which was revised from time to time.
1106
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
8. It is also maintained by the ld. counsel for the applicant that the workman remained with the respondent no.3
w.e.f. 07.06.2010 to 05.06.2017 continuously without any break and was terminated on 05.06.2017 without
compliance of Section 25F of the ID Act and without paying any retrenchment compensation or pay in lieu of notice.
Thus management has violated the provisions of Section 25F of the ID Act and therefore applicant is entitled for re-
instatement with back wages. He has no alternate job and is unemployed till date.
9. It is also maintained by the applicant that even before the ALC, respondent has admitted that applicant worked
for 240 days prior to his termination as per Annexure-1.
Submissions of Respondents:
10. While arguing the case, ld. counsel for the respondents contended that the applicant was appointed as GDS
Outsider Packer by respondent no.3 and he worked firstly due to promotion of Sh. Rajvir and thereafter non joining
of Sh. Ramesh Kumar, he worked in place of Sh. Ramesh Kumar on different dates as given in the written statement
from 01.02.2014 to 28.05.2017. He was engaged as outsider GDS Packer for different intervals and as per Section 2
(oo) (bb) of the ID Act, his services were terminated on the completion of his contract period. He also contended that
outsider GDS does not fall under the definition of workman and Industrial Tribunal has no jurisdiction to adjudicate
in their matter. To support this view, ld. counsel for the respondent relied upon the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme
Court of India in case titled as Municipal Council, Samrala versus Raj Kumar 2006(3) SCC 861 and prayed that the
claim of applicant may be rejected.
Findings:-
11.
It is added here that in this case, as per respondent, applicant was working as outsider GDS for the period, for
which he has worked with the respondent. In this regard, ld. counsel for respondent placed on file guidelines (issued
by respondent) for regulating substitute/provisional arrangement made in place of regular GDS. Para 2 of the said
guidelines (Annexure-2) read as follow:-
2.
In this context, I am directed to draw your attention to the DG( Posts) instructions given below Rule 5 of the
P & T ED Agents (Conducts and Services) Rules 1964 corresponding to Rule 7 of the Gramin Dak Sevaks (Conduct
and Employment) Rules, 2001 which interalia, stipulate the following:-
“During leave, every GDS should arrange for his work being carried on by a substitute who should be a person
approved by the authority competent to sanction leave to him. Such approval should be obtained in writing'' and that:
“It is necessary for the appointing authority to ensure that such a substitute is not allowed to work indefinitely. If the
absence from duty of the regular GDS is likely to last indefinitely, the appointing authority should take regular
appointment and the person so appointed immediate steps to make a need not necessarily be the substitute.”
12. Undoubtedly in this case, applicant, after the promotion of Rajvir, was appointed as outsider GDS as his
substitute and his service come to an end on appointment of Sh. Ramesh Kumar. However, Ramesh Kumar did not
join the post office. This fact has already been admitted by the respondent that applicant worked from 07.06.2010 till
28.05.2017. During this period, no arrangement was made by the respondent to appoint any regular incumbent in
place of the applicant in terms of aforesaid para 2 as reproduced above. Moreover, initially, he was appointed as GDS
outsider, but after the appointment of Sh. Ramesh Kumar, it could not be said that he was GDS outsider and he
continuously worked. His status can be that of temporary workman, not outsider GDS. Had he been working as
outsider GDS in place of some regular employee, who made arrangement as substitute in place of him, then only he
could have been termed as outsider GDS. However, in this case, after non-joining of Ramesh Kumar, who was
appointed as permanent employee in place of applicant (applicant was working outsider GDS on the post of GDS) on
11.03.2011. Ashok Kumar worked intermittently with respondent no.3 continuously for 7 years.
13. So far as this argument of the ld. counsel for the respondent that the case of workman fall under Section 2(oo)
(bb) of the ID Act and his case is covered by the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court titled as Municipal Council,
Samrala (supra), the same is not attracted to the case of the applicant as there was no contract between the applicant
and respondent regarding working of applicant for a particular period of time. Thus, the case law cited above is not
applicable in this case as the applicant worked intermittently with the respondent no.3 without contract between
parties.
14. Now we are to decide is whether the claimant comes within the definition of "workman" as is defined in Section
2(S) of the Act. It is mentioned here that claimant was appointed as GDS Packer as per his claim petition and
affidavit submitted before the Tribunal. However, in view of the above discussion, he worked as temporary worker
after appointment of Sh. Ramesh Kumar and thereafter he worked intermittently. In plain words the claimant was
performing his duties as labourer/unskilled worker. He was not in supervisory or administrative post requiring him to
perform only administrative post requiring him to perform only administrative duties. While interpreting Section 2(S)
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Devinder Singh V/s Municipal Council, Sanaur AlR 2011 Supreme Court
2532, has observed as follows:-
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1107
"The source of employment, the quantum of recruitment, the terms and conditions of employment/contract of service,
the quantum of wages/ pay and mode of payment are not at all relevant for deciding whether or not a person is a
workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of Act. The definition of workman also does not make any distinction
between full time and part time employee or a person appointed on contract basis. There is nothing in the plain
language of Section 2(s) from which it can be inferred that only person employed on regular basis or a person
employed for doing whole time job is a workman and the one employed on temporary, part time or contract basis on
fixed wages or as a causal employee or for doing duty for fixed hours is not a workman.”
15.
Thus, Hon'ble Supreme Court has clarified that the definition of workman also does not make any
distinction between full time or part time or a person appointed on contract basis. There is nothing in employee plain
language of Section 2(S) from which it can be infer that only person employed on regular basis or a person employed
for doing whole time job is a workman and the one employed temporary, part time or contract basis on fixed wages
or as a casual employee or for doing duty for fixed hours is not a workman. In view of the ratio of law enunciated in
the above ruling, in my considered opinion, the claimant herein admittedly falls within the definition of 'workman'
under Section 2(S) of the Act.
16.
The payment of salary by the management is admitted by the respondent in its written statement as well as
in the affidavit of filed by Sh. Jawahar Singh working as ASPOs (HQ), Gurgaon Division, wherein he categorically
stated that workman worked on different dates as mentioned in his affidavit and was paid Rs. 15,753/- per months
and he was also paid Rs.2,295 + DA (as admissible from time to time). He also admitted that applicant was on
temporary basis for certain period and applicant has no right to reinstate in his service. As per applicant, he was
retrenched from service on 05.06.2017, but as per respondent, he worked till 28.05.2017. If we take one year prior to
28.05.2017 as stated by the respondent, then he had completed 240 days in the preceding year as per written
statement filed by respondent in this case, detail of which is as follow as mentioned in the written statement:-
01.04.2016 to 31.05.2016 – 4 days
01.07.2016 to 31.07.2016 – 31 days
01.08.2016 to 30.09.2016 – 61 days
01.10.2016 to 31.10.2016 – 31 days
01.12.2016 to 31.01.2017 – 62 days
01.03.2017 to 28.05.2017 – 89 days
Total – 278 days.
17.
However, Sh. Jawahar Singh in his affidavit has given different dates. In the affidavit he has not mentioned the
period from 01.04.2016 to 31.01.2017. Thus, in his affidavit, respondent has tried to conceal the material facts, which
goes to show that respondents have concealed material facts about the working of the applicant prior to his
termination preceding one year.
18.
Admittedly, the respondent is an industry and there was non- compliance of Section 25-F of the Act. The
workman has already been able to prove that he worked continuously for a period of 240 days prior to his termination
of his services by respondent no.1 on 28.05.2014 as he was receiving regular wages from 2010 till 2017 is proven
from respondent as statement of workman WW1. There is violation of Section 25-F of the Act and in view of the
judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.Vs Man Singh,_2012(1)_SCT 641, it is not
necessary that relief of reinstatement has to be given as a matter of right. Reliance can also be placed upon Jasbir
Singh Vs Haryana State Agriculture Marketing Board, 2009(3) SCT 790, under which it has been held that in the
legal position and the Court had recent past, there had been a shift in consistently taken the view that relief by way of
reinstatement with back wages is not automatic and may he wholly inappropriate in a given fact situation, even
though termination Of an employee was in contravention of the prescribed procedure. Compensation instead of
reinstatement was held to be the prudent relief to meet the ends of justice. Moreover, Hon'ble Supreme Court of India
in case titled as District Development Officer & Anr. V/s Satish Kantilal Amrelia, Civil Appeal Nos. 19857-19858
of 2017; decided on 28 November , 2017 has held as follow:
"that the reasons for denying the relief of reinstatement in such cases are obvious, It is trite law that when the
termination is found to be illegal because of non-payment of retrenchment compensation and notice pay as
mandatorily required under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, even after reinstatement, it is always open to
the management to terminate the services of that employee by paying him the retrenchment compensation. Since such
a workman was working on daily-wage basis and even after he is reinstated, he has no right to seek regularization.
Thus he cannot claim regularization and he has no right to continue even as daily-wage worker, no useful purpose is
going to be served in reinstatement such a workman and he can be given monetary compensation by the Court itself
inasmuch as if he is terminated again after reinstatement, he would receive monetary compensation only in the form
of retrenchment compensation and notice pay. In such a situation, giving the relief of reinstatement, that too after a
long gap, would not serve any purpose".
1108
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
In view of above discussed above workman entitled for compensation as he was working on temporary
basis intermittently.
19.
Learned counsel for the workman has also argued that for rendering one year service workman should be
granted Rs.1 lac per year and since the workman has worked for about 7 years and therefore compensation of Rs.7
lac be awarded to the workman in view of the judgment of Hon'ble High Court in case titled Municipal Council
Dina Nagar Vs Presiding Officer Labour Court on 29 November, 2014.
20. It is added here that in the present case workman has intermittently worked for about less than 7 years as GDS
Packer as is itself stated by the respondent. He was working intermittently for less than 7 years and keeping in view
the above discussed circumstances and case law titled as Hemant Babruvahan Parchake versus Social Welfare
Officer, Somalwar Bhavan, Mount Road, Sadar, Nagpur and others 201 (4) AIR BomR 781, wherein for 18
months, a sum of Rs.25,000/- was granted as compensation, workman is granted Rs.1,25,000/- as compensation.
21. Annexure-1 and Annexure-2 are made part of this award.
22. Let copy of this award be sent to the Appropriate Government as required under Section 17 of the Act for
publication.
KAMAL KANT, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 405.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,केन्रीय
सरकार पटेल इंिीजनयररंग, र्कनी संगलिान, रामबन, िम्मू और कश्मीर, के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री
मोिम्मि िनीफ़, कामगार, के बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण-सि-श्रम न्यायालय-2, र्ंडीगढ़,
पंर्ाट (संिभच संख्या 41/2023)को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै,प्रकाजित करती िै िो केन्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट
कॉपी के साथ 06.03.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-42025-07-2025-आईआर(डीयू)-41]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 6th March, 2025
S.O. 405.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 41/2023) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum
Labour Court-2, Chandigarh, as Patel Engineering, Chakni Sangaldan, Ramban, Jammu and Kashmir, and
Shri Mohd. Hanief, Worker, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government
on 06.03.2025.
[No. L-42025-07-2025-IR(DU)-41]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II,
CHANDIGARH
(Presided over by Mr. Kamal Kant).
ID No.41/2023
Registered on:-05.10.2023
Mohd. Hanief S/o Mohd. Shafi, R/o Famrote, Post Office Sangaldan, Tehsil Gool, Distt. Ramban,
Jammu and Kashmir, Jammu and Kashmir-182144.
-------- Applicant
Versus
Patel Engineering, Chakni Sangaldan, Ramban, Jammu and Kashmir-182144.
----Respondent
Present:-
None for Workman
None for management.
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1109
Award : 07.01.2025
Central Government vide Notification No.08 (35)/2022/RLC/Jmu Dated 04.10.2023, under sub-
section 5 of Section 12 read with sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(hereinafter called the Act), has referred the following Industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:-
“Whether the action of the management of M/s Patel Engineering, Chakni Sangaldan,
Ramban, Jammu and Kashmir-182144 in terminating the services of Mohd. Hanief S/o Mohd.
Shafi, R/o Famrote, Post Office Sangaldan, Tehsil Gool, Distt. Ramban, Jammu and Kashmir
(UT) w.e.f. 13.09.2021 is justified, fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman is entitled
and from which date?”
1. On the receipt of the above reference, notice was sent to the workman as well as to the respondent on
05.10.2023 for 06.02.2024. On 06.02.2024, Sh. Rajender Kumar filed memo of appearance on behalf of
management. But no one turned up on behalf of the workman and the matter was adjourned for 02.07.2024.
However, none appeared on behalf of the parties on 02.07.2024 and fresh notice was issued to workman for
27.08.2024 for appearance as well as for filing claim statement. On 27.08.2024 also, none appeared on behalf
of the parties and the matter was adjourned for 07.01.2025 for appearance and filing claim statement by
workman. Today also no one turned up on behalf of the workman and management. The workman has been
given sufficient opportunities to file claim statement but none turned up in spite of the opportunity afforded to
file claim statement, which shows that the workman not interested in adjudication of the matter on merit.
2. Since the workman has neither put his appearance nor he has filed any statement of claim to prove his case
against the respondent, as such, this Tribunal is left with no choice, except to pass a 'No Claim Award'.
Accordingly, 'No Claim Award' is passed in the present reference.
3. Let copy of this award be sent to the Appropriate Government as required under Section 17 of the Act for
publication.
KAMAL KANT, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 406.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 (a1947 dk 14 ) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
gkM+ksrh {kS=h; xzkeh.k cSad ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V औद्योजगक fookn esa
dsUnzh; ljdkj औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; dksVk ds iapkV 26@2001¼lhvkbZ,l&21@2014½ ¼lh,uvkj& vkjtsdsVh
060001772001½) ,25@2001¼lhvkbZ,l&165@2014½¼lh,uvkj&vkjtsdsVh060003282001½ प्रकाजित djrh gSA
[सं. एल-12012/209/1998-आईआर(बी-I)]
सलोनी, उप जनिेिक
New Delhi, the 6th March, 2025
S.O. 406.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 26/2001(CIS-21/2014)(CNR-RJKT 060001772001),25/2001 ( CIS
-165/2014)( CNR-060001772001) of the Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Kota as shown in the Annexure, in the
industrial dispute between the management of Hadoti Kshetriya Gramin Bank and their workmen.
[No. L-12012/209/1998-IR(B-I)]
SALONI, Dy. Director
U;k;k/kh'k] vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/kdj.k¼dsUnzh;½dksVk]¼jkt-½
ihBklhu vf/kdkjh& lanhi dqekj 'kekZ] vkj-,p-ts-,l- ¼ftyk tt laoxZ½
1&
funsZ'k izdj.k dzekad%vkS-U;k-¼dsUnzh;½&26@2001¼lhvkbZ,l&21@2014½
¼lh,uvkj&vkjtsdsVh060001772001½
fnukad LFkkfir% 23-11-2001
izlax% Hkkjr ljdkj] Je ea=ky;] ubZ fnYyh ds vkns'k dz- ,y&12012@209@1998 vkbZvkj¼ch-vkbZ-½ fnukad 05-09-2000
2&
funsZ'k izdj.k dzekad%vkS-U;k-¼dsUnzh;½&25@2001¼lhvkbZ,l&165@2014½
1110
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
¼lh,uvkj&vkjtsdsVh060003282001½
fnukad LFkkfir% 22-10-2001
izlax% Hkkjr ljdkj] Je ea=ky;] ubZ fnYyh ds vkns'k dz- ,y&12012@209@1998 vkbZvkj¼ch-vkbZ-½ fnukad 05-09-2000
funsZ'k@fookn vUrxZr /kkjk 10¼1½¼?k½ ,oa mi/kkjk 2¼d½ vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e]1947
e/;
oh-ih- xqIrk] tfj,&tkWbaV tujy lsdszVjh] fgUn etnwj lHkk] caxkyh dkWyksuh] dksVk
--------izkFkhZ Jfed
,oa
v/;{k] gkM+ksrh {kS=h; xzkeh.k cSad] >kykokM+ jksM+] dksVk
-------vizkFkhZ fu;kstd
mifLFkr
izkFkhZ Jfed dh vksj ls izfrfuf/k%&
Jh ';ke xqIrk
vizkFkhZ fu;kstd dh vksj ls izfrfuf/k%&
Jh egs'k pUn xqIrk
%%vf/kfu.kZ;%%
fnukad%30-09-2024
Hkkjr ljdkj] Je ea=ky;] ubZ fnYyh ds izklkafxd vkns'k fnukad 05-09-2000 ds tfj;s funsZ'k fookn]
vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼ftls vkxs **vf/kfu;e** ls lEcksf/kr fd;k tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 10¼1½¼?k½ ,oa mi/kkjk 2¼d½ ds vUrxZr bl
U;k;kf/kdj.k dks vf/kfu.kZ;kFkZ izkIr gqvk gS%&
"Whether Shri V.P. Gupta, employed, as a Branch Manager in Hadoti
Gramin Bank, Kota, is a workman under Section 2(S) of the I.D. Act, 1947.
If yes, whether the action of the management Hadoti Gramin Bank through
its Chairman in removing Shri V.P. Gupta from Service w.e.f. 08-04-97 is
disproportionate to the proved guilt or not. If not, what relief the workman is
entitled?"
2&
;gka ;g mYys[k fd;k tkuk lehphu gksxk fd izdj.k la- 26@2001 ,oa 25@2001 esa izkIr jsQjsal vkns'k fnukad 05-09-2000 ,d gh
jsQzsal vkns'k dh izfr;ka gS tks bl U;k;kf/kdj.k dks vyx&vyx fnukad dks izkIr gqbZ blfy, bu izdj.kksa dks izdj.k la- 25@2001 esa ikfjr
vkns'k fn- 20-09-2011 }kjk izdj.k la- 25@2001 dks izdj.k la- 26@2001 ds lkFk uRFkh fd;k x;kA
;gka ;g Hkh mYys[kuh; gS fd ;g jsQjsal vkns'k fnukad 05-09-2000 loZizFke vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/kdj.k] t;iqj esa ntZ fd;k x;k Fkk
ftlds ckn Hkkjr ljdkj ds Je ea=ky; ds vkns'k fn- 23-11-2001 }kjk ;g izdj.k dsUnz ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] t;iqj
ls varfjr gksdj bl U;k;kf/kdj.k dks izkIr gqvk gSA
3&
mDr fookn] U;k;kf/kdj.k esa jsQj gksus ij iathc) dj i{kdkjksa dks mifLFkfr ckcr uksfVl tkjh fd, x,A uksfVl dh ikyuk esa
izkFkhZ Jfed }kjk mifLFkr gksdj LVsVesUV vkWQ Dyse U;k;kf/kdj.k ds le{k izLrqr dj laf{kIrr% ;g dFku fd;k x;k gS fd mls izfri{kh }kjk
izkjEHk esa fu;qfDr i= fnukad 26-10-1983 ds }kjk {ks= i;Zos{kd ds in ij fu;ksftr fd;k x;k FkkA izkFkhZ dks fnukad 13-05-87 ds vkns'k ls
fnukad 10-02-86 ls {ks= i;Zos{kd ds in ij izfri{kh }kjk LFkkbZ dj fn;k x;kA izkFkhZ fMizs'ku jksx ls xzLr Fkk] ftlds fy, fu;fer :i ls
fpfdRlk dh lykg o nok vko';d FkhA izkFkhZ us vusdksa ckj izfri{kh ls vkxzg fd;k fd mls fdlh ,sls LFkku ij fu;qDr fd;k tkos] tgka
fpfdRlk ,oa nokbZ;ak miyCk jgs] fdUrq izkFkhZ dk vkxzg Lohdkj u djds mls lnSo xzkeh.k {ks= esa gh j[kk x;k blds ckotwn dh izkFkhZ dh lsok
esa mRre Fkh rFkk izkFkhZ us y{; ls dkQh vPNk dk;Z fd;k] ftlds QyLo:i cSad us izkFkhZ dks vusd ckj iz'kalk i= fn,A izkFkhZ dks fn- 15-12-
89 ds vkns'k ls vf/kdkjh ds in ij inkSUur dj fn;k x;kA izkFkhZ Jfed dks fn- 02-01-92 ds vkns'k ls 'kk[kk esMksyk esa izca/kd ds in ij
inLFkkfir fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ us fnukad 04-01-92 dks viuh mifLFkfr mDr in ij ns nhA izkFkhZ dks fn- 04-07-95 ds vkns'k ls esMksyk ls 'kk[kk
esy[ksM+h esa LFkkukUrfjr dj fn;k x;kA izfri{kh dh 'kk[kk esy[ksM+h esa izkFkhZ dk in 'kk[kk izca/kd dk Fkk] fdUrq bl 'kk[kk esa izkFkhZ ds in xzg.k
djus ds i'pkr ls gh fyfid lg jksdfM+;k ds in ij dksbZ Hkh fu;qDr ugha jgk] ftlds dkj.k 'kk[kk esas izkFkhZ rFkk ,d prqFkZ Js.kh dqy 2 gh
deZpkjh jg x,A izkFkhZ dks izca/kdh; rFkk lqijokbtjh@'kfDr;ka izkIr ugha FkhA izkFkhZ rFkk mldh 'kk[kk ds leLr dk;ksZa dk lqijfotu {ks=
izca/kd ckjka ds }kjk fd;k tkrk FkkA esy[ksM+h 'kk[kk ds izkFkhZ dk dk;Z eq[;r% fyfidh; FkkA izkFkhZ esy[ksM+h 'kk[kk ds izkFkhZ dks ds'k VªkatsD'ku esa
xzkgdksa dks iSlk nsuk o mudk iSlk tek djus] [kkrs [kksyuk] [kksyus ds QkeZ Hkjuk] iSlk tek djokus o fudyokus ds okmpj cukuk] okmpjksa
dk fy[kuk] iksfLVax [kksrsa esa djuk] jksdM+ ds'k cqd fy[kuk] Ms&cqd fy[kuk] tuZy Ms&cqd fy[kuk] lkIrkfgd] ikf{kd] ekfld] =S&ekfld]
izfrosnu rS;kj djukA le;≤ ij lwpuk rS;kj djuk] ekfld csysal ysuk] xzkgdksa ds [kkrksa dh jkf'k dk fjdUlhys'ku djuk] uksV fxuuk]
xM~Mh cukuk] x<~<h cukdj isdsV cukuk] cSysal feykuk] MªkQ~V cukuk] cSysal rS;kj djuk] Mkd rS;kj djuk jftLVj esa p<+kuk] jftLVMZ Mkd
dk vyx ls bUnzkt djuk] Mkd Hkstuk] ckgj ls vkbZ Mkd izkir djuk mls vkod jftLVj esa p<+kuk] Mkd dks fMCcs esa Mkyuk] Mkd ?kj esa
tkdj Mkd dh jftLVªh djkuk] mPp vf/kdfj;ksa }kjk fjVuZ ekaxus ij fjVuZ nsukA xzkgdksa dks vR;f/kd jkf'k dk Hkqxrku djus gsrq vU; cSadksa dh
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1111
'kk[kk ls iSlk ysus tkus dk dk;Z] rFkk vR;f/kd iSlk cSad esa xzkgdksa dk tek gksus ij ckjksa 'kk[kk esa tek djus tkuk] ys[kk nLrkost o jsdkWMZ
j[kuk] okmpj Qk;y djuk] LVkWd jftLVj esusVsu djuk vkfn dk;Z eq[;r% izkFkhZ dks jkstkuk djuk iM+rk FkkA fu;kstd ds ;gka mPp
vf/kdkfj;ksa ds funs'kkuqlkj mudh vkns'kksa dh ikyuk esa tks fd lHkh dk;Z fyfidh; dk;Z gSA izkFkhZ dks fdlh Hkh deZpkjh dks fu;qfDr nsus mlds
fo:) vuq'kklfud dk;Zokgh djus psrkouh nsus] fuyafcr djus ukSdjh ls gVkus o vodk'k Lohd`r djus vkfn ds vf/kdkj ugha FksA izkFkhZ ds
ikl dksbZ lqijokbtjh dk;Z ugha FkkA mldh 'kk[kk esa dsoy ,d prqFkZ Js.kh deZpkjh Fkk] tks fd mldh rFkk cSad dh 'kk[kk ds dk;Z lg;ksx ds
fy, FkkA lapkyu] iz'kklfud] izca/ku ,oa fu;eu dk dksbZ dk;Z izkFkhZ }kjk ugha fd;k x;k gSA bl izdkj izkFkhZ dk eq[; dk;Z fyfidh; rFkk
rduhfd izo`fr dk Fkk] ftlls izkFkhZ vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2 ¼,l½ esa of.kZr ^^odZeSu^^ gSA Lo;a izfri{kh cSad dk izca/ku Hkh izkFkhZ rFkk mlds laoxZ
ds deZpkfj;ksa dks odZeSu Lohdkj djrk gS] vkSj mlus bl laoxZ ds deZpkfj;ksa rFkk mudh VªsM ;wfu;uksa ds lkFk vf/kfu;e ds rgr f}i{kh;
rFkk f=i{kh; le>kSrs fd, gSA izkFkhZ fnukad 09-05-1996 dks izkFkhZ viuh 'kk[kk esy[ksM+h ds nSfud ysunsu o vko';d gkFk uxnh dh jkf'k
30]000@&:- izkIr djus ds fy, izfri{kh cSad dh 'kk[kk ckjka esa mifLFkr gqvk FkkA ;g dk;Z fyfid lg jksdfM+;k dk Fkk blfy, izkFkhZ
30]000@&:- ckjka 'kk[kk esa ysus x;kA izkFkhZ fnukad 09-05-96 dks izkr% 9-35 cts rd cSad dh ckjka 'kk[kk esa igwapk] vkSj 'kk[kk izca/kd dks gkFk
uxnh ds fy, 30]000@&:- dh ekax i=@izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k rks 'kk[kk izca/kd us ml ij 30]000@&:- nsus dh izkFkZuk Lohdkj dj yh
ml le; rd 'kk[kk ds jksdfM+;k Jh ;nqoa'kh M~;wVh ij mifLFkr ugha gq, Fks rc rd izkFkhZ cSad esa 30]000@&:- dk okmpj Hkjk vkSj jksdfM+;k
dh izrh{kk djus yxkA jksdfM+;k ds vkus ij izkFkhZ mls okmpj vkSj izca/kd dk vkns'k ns fn;k] rks jksdfM+;k us crk;k fd bl le; lqcg
30]000@& :- mlds ikl ugha vkidks 20]000@&:- ns ldrk gSA blfy, vki okmpj esa 30]000@&:- dkVdj 20]000@& dj nsaA izkFkhZ us
dSf'k;j ds dgus ij okmpj dks la'kksf/kr djds ns fn;kA jksdfM+;k us rqjar ,d fyQkQs esa uksV ykdj izkFkhZ fn, izkFkhZ us fyQkQs dks viuh
vVsph esa j[kdj viuh 'kk[kk ds fy, izkLFkku dj x;kA pwafd rc rd 10 ;k 10-15 gks pqds Fks] vkSj izkFkhZ ij ;g ncko Fkk fd mldh 'kk[kk ds
xzkgd Hkqxrku gsrq mldh izrh{kk dj jgs gksxsaA izkFkhZ yxHkx lk<+s nl cts ds yxHkx viuh 'kk[kk esa igqapk rks ml le; rhu O;fDr 'kk[kk esa
izkFkhZ ds Hkqxrku ysus ds fy, izrh{kk dj jgs Fks rFkk mUgsa dkQh tYnh Fkh mUgksus izkFkhZ dks ;g nsj ls vkus dk mykguk fn;kA izkFkhZ us xzkgdksa
dks fuiVkus ds fy, viuh 'kk[kk dk ds'k ugha [kksyk vkSj ckjka ls yk, x, uksV lh/ks njkt esa Mkydj Hkqxrku izkjEHk dj fn;kA izkFkhZ vHkh
Hkqxrku dj gh jgk Fkk fd yxHkx 11 cts cSad dh ckjka 'kk[kk ds izca/kd Jh ds-,y- esgrk rFkk cSad eq[;ky; ls vk, gq, vf/kdkjh Jh jkor
izkFkhZ dh 'kk[kk esa igqapsA mDr vf/kdkfj;ksa us vkrs gh cSad esa mifLFkr lHkh xzkgdksa dks ckgj fudky fn;k o njoktk can djds izkFkhZ ds
czhQds'k vkfn dh ryk'kh ysus yxsA izkFkhZ muds bl O;ogkj ls LrC/k jg x;k izkFkhZ us muls iwNk fd ,slk D;ksa fd;k tk jgk gS rks mUgksus izkFkhZ
ds iz'u dk mRrj nsus ds LFkku ij mlls vkxs loky djuk izkjEHk dj fn;kA izkFkhZ ls mUgskus iwNk rqEgkjs ikl ds'k iwjk gS] izkFkhZ us dgk iwjk gS
fQj mUgksus iwNk vkius 'kk[kk ds ds'k [kksy fn;k] rks izkFkhZ us crk;k fd mlds vkus ij ;gka xzkgd izrh{kk esa [kM+s Fks blfy, ckjka 'kk[kk ls
yk;h xbZ jkf'k gh njkt esa Mkydj Hkqxrku izkjEHk dj fn;k Fkk tSls le; feyrk og ds'k [kksy ysrkA nksuksa vf/kdkjh izkFkhZ dks MkaVus yxs fd
ds'k [kksyus ds igys gh dSls dke izkjEHk dj fn;k vkfn&vkfnA mUgksaus cSad dk ds'k [kqyok;k vkSj ds'k vkfn dh ryk'kh yh vksj ds'k dk
feyku fd;k rks cSad dh njkt esa ftlesa izkFkhZ us ckjka ls ykbZ x;h jkf'k Mkyh Fkh 10]000@&:- vf/kd fudyhA izkFkhZ ls bldk Li"Vhdj.k
ekaxus ij mlus crk;k fd mlus rks viuh 'kk[kk esa xzkgdksa dks le; ls Hkqxrku djus dh fpUrk esa jkf'k u ckjka esa fxuh vkSj uk gh ;gka
esy[ksM+h ;gka rd fd] Jh ;nqoa'kh us ftl fyQkQs esa uksV fn, Fks] mls [kksydj Hkh ugha ns[kk vkSj ;gka vkrs gh fyQkQs dks ;gka njkt esa myV
fn;k mls rks ;g Hkh /;ku ugha fd fdl rjg ds uksV Jh ;nqoa'kh us mls fn, og rks lgdfeZ;ksa ds Hkjksls esa gh cSad fgr esa dke djrk jgk]
;fn 10]000@&:- vf/kd gS] rks Jh ;nqoa'kh jksdfM+;k dh Hkwy ;k xyrh ls vf/kd vk x, gSA izkFkhZ ds bl dFku ij nksuksa vf/kdkfj;ksa us
vfo'okl O;Dr fd;k vkSj lkjk nks"k izkFkhZ ij e<+ fn;k vkSj dgus yxs fd Jh ;nqoa'kh us rqEgs 20]000@&:- gh fn, Fks] rqe 10]000@&:-
dey tSu ds ikl ls pqjk dj yk, gksA izkFkhZ us bl rF; dk dMk+ fojks/k fd;k fdUrq nksuksa vf/kdkjh izkFkhZ dks gh nks"kh Bgjkrs jgsA mUgskus
izkFkhZ /kedh nh fd os iqfyl esa fjiksVZ ntZ djok,axs] iqfyl izkFkhZ dk peM+k rksM+ nsxh] eghus&15 fnu tsy esa jgksxs] ukSdjh pyh tk,xh] izkFkhZ
dkQh le; iwoZ ls gh fMizs'ku dk jksxh jgk gS] nksuksa vf/kdkfj;ksa dh bl ccZjrkiw.kZ O;ogkj ls oks iwjh rjg ls fMizs'ku esa vk x;kA nksuksa
vf/kdfj;ksa us izkFkhZ ls dgk fd rqe ;g fy[k nks fd xyrh ls 10]000@&:- esjs lkFk vk x,] rqEgkjs fo:) dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha djsxsasA izkFkhZ us
nksukas vf/kdkfj;ksa ds dFku ij fo'okl dj fy;kA ,slh voLFkk esas nksuksa vf/kdkfj;ksa us izkFkhZ ls ,d iphZ ij ;g fy[kok;k fd og xyrh mls
mDr 10]000@&:- dh jkf'k cSad dh ckjka 'kk[kk ls vf/kd ys vk;k Fkk] bl xyrh ds fy, mls {kek fd;k tkosA 10]000@&:- dh jkf'k esa
mDr nksuksa vf/kdfj;ksa dks okil ykSVk jgk gwa blds ckn nksuksa vf/kdkjh mDr jkf'k ysdj okil vk x,A izkFkhZ dks izfri{kh us mDr ?kVuk ds
fo"k; esa fn- 13-05-96 dks Kkiu fn;kA izkFkhZ ls fn- 09-05-96 dks gh mDr ?kVuk ds laca/k esa MkaV&McV dj ccZjrkiw.kZ o dzwj O;ogkj fd;k
ftlls izkFkhZ fMiz'ku esa vk x;k vkSj fMizs'ku dh voLFkk esa fy[kok fy;k Fkk vkSj ;g Hkh izkFkhZ dks fo'okl fn;k Fkk fd mlds fo:) dksbZ
dk;Zokgh ugha dh tkosxhA izkFkhZ us mDr nksuksa vf/kdkfj;ksa ls lEidZ fd;k rks mUgksus dgk fd rqe xyrh Lohdkj djrs gq, ekQh ekax yksxs rks
rqEgsa blds fy, dksbZ n.M ugha fn;k tkosxk] oSls Hkh rqEgkjh dksbZ xyrh rks gS ughaA izkFkhZ us muds dgus ij fo'okl djds vkSj muds
vko'oklu ds vuq:i viuk Li"Vhdj.k cSad ds i= ds lkFk izsf"kr dj fn;kA izfri{kh us izkFkhZ iqu% ,d Kkiu fn- 28-05-96 dks fn;k] ftlesa
izkFkhZ ds fo:) foHkkxh; tkap fd, tkus ds fu.kZ; ls vofxr djkrs gq, izkFkhZ ls fyf[kr oDrO; izLrqr djus dks dgk x;k Fkk vkSj ;g Hkh fd
og vius oDrO; esa vkjksi fo'ks"k dks Lohdkj djsa vFkkZr dksbZ Li"Vhdj.k ugha nsa] ;fn fd mDr Kkiu ds rF; ltsfLVo pktZ'khV ds jgs gSaA
mDr Kkiu fn- 28-05-96 dks izkIr gksus ij izkFkhZ mDr nksuksa vf/kdfj;ksa Jh esgrk o Jh jkor o Lo;a v/;{k izfri{kh cSad ls feyk vkSj viuh
ckr Li"V dh rks izfri{kh us dgk fd ge tkurs gS fd rqe funksZ"k gks fdUrq f'kdk;r feyus ij gekjs fy, dk;Zokgh djuk t:jh gSA rqe vkjksiksa
dks T;ksa dk R;ksa v{kj'k% Lohdkj dj yks] eSa viuh 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, rqEgsa {kek dj nwaxkA T;knk ls T;knk rqEgsa dsoy psrkouh nh
tkosxhA izkFkhZ us izfri{kh ds vko'oklu ds vuq:i Kkiu fn- 28-05-96 dks mRrj izsf"kr dj fn;kA lwpuk fn- 07-06-96 ds }kjk izfri{kh us Jh
,l-vkj- gqlSu dks tkap vf/kdkjh fu;qDr dj fn;k vkSj tkap dj ,d ekg esa QkbfMaxl izLrqr djus dk vkns'k fn;kA Jh ,l-vkbZ gqlSu }kjk
fn- 06-07-96 dks {ks=h; dk;kZy;] ckjka esa tkap dh xbZA mUgksaus izkFkhZ dks dgk fd tkap rks vkSipkfjdrk gS rqe igys gh vkjksi Lohdkj dj pqds
gks] eSa vkt dh dk;Zokgh fy[k nsrk gwa mUgksus tkap dh dk;Zokgh Vkbi djokbZ] izkFkhZ dks pwafd izfri{kh us vko'okl ns pqdk Fkk] fd mls psrkouh
ls vf/kd n.M ugha fn;k tkosxkA tkap vf/kdkjh us ;g Hkh dgk fd rqe bl ij gLrk{kj dj nks] rqEgkjs fo:) dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha dh tkosxh]
izkFkhZ us dk;Zokgh ij gLrk{kj dj fn,A tkap vf/kdkjh us fn- 28-07-96 dks viuh QkbfMaxl izfri{kh dks izLrqr dhA izfri{kh us fn- 14-10-96 dks
izkFkhZ ls vkifRr;ka ekaxhA izkFkhZ us izfri{kh ds vk'oklu ds dkj.k rFkk mlds dFku ij fo'okl djrs gq, dksbZ vkifRr uk djrs gq,
1112
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
lgkuqHkwfriwoZd fu.kZ; ysus dh izkFkZuk dhA izfri{kh us Lo;a us mlds }kjk izkFkhZ dks fn, x, leLr vko';d o dFku ds fo:) izkFkhZ dks
lokZf/kd dBksj n.M inP;wfr dk n.Mkns'k fn- 27-11-96 ds }kjk izLrkfor fd;k rFkk fnukad 16-12-96 dks O;fDrxr] lquokbZ gsrq cqyok;kA
izLrkfor n.M dh lwpuk izkFkhZ dks dkQh osnuk o vk/kkr~ yxkA izkFkhZ igys ls gh fMizs'ku dk jksxh gksus ds dkj.k] xaHkhj :i ls chekj gks x;k]
vkSj O;fDrxr lqjokbZ ls mifLFkr gksus ds yk;d ugha jgkA izkFkhZ dks O;fDrxr lquokbZ dh frfFk;ka c<+kus ds fy, izfri{kh dks vusd ckj i=
fy[kus iM+sA fn- 22-02-97 dks izfri{kh ds le{k O;fDrxr lquokbZ gsrq izkFkhZ mifLFkr gqvkA izkFkhZ us izfri{kh ds le{k viuh Li"V dj nhA
izfri{kh us Lo;a Lohdkj fd;k fd] ml ij xyr rjhds ls vkjksi yxk;k x;k gS rFkk ekeyk ,slk Fkk fd f'kdk;r gh ugha gksus pkfg, Fkh ;fn
,slh NksVh f'kdk;r] NksVh Hkqyksa dh f'kdk;rksa] ij tkap gksus yxh rks cSafdax dk dk;Z dj ikuk laHko ugha gSA O;fDrxr lquokbZ ds i'pkr izkFkhZ
izfri{kh ds vko'lku ls vk'oLr Fkk vkSj mls izfri{kh ds vko'oklu ij ;dhu o Hkjkslk Fkk fd mls psrkouh ls vf/kd n.M ugha fn;k tkosxkA
fdUrq izfri{kh us fn- 17-08-97 ds vafre vkns'k }kjk izkFkhZ dks inP;wr dk n.M ikfjr fd;k x;k] ftl ij MkW- ,l-Mh- 'kekZ ds gLrk{kj gSA ;g
vkns'k izkFkhZ dks Kkiu fn- 08-04-97 ds }kjk fn;k x;kA izkFkhZ dks izfri{kh us fo'okl o Hkjksls esa ysdj vko'oklu o dFku djds ok;nk
f[kykQh dk d`R; djds mDr n.Mkns'k izkFkhZ ds fo:) ikfjr fd;k gSA izkFkhZ us vius i= fn- 21-04-97 ls izfri{kh dks lwfpr fd;k fd og
n.Mkns'k dh vizlUurk ls vihy djuk pkgrk gSA izkFkhZ dh mDr vkihy fcuk lqus o fcuk dksbZ vk/kkj ij [kkfjt dj fn;kA izkFkhZ ds fo:)
fojfpr vkjksi ,oa vkjksiksa ds fooj.k Li"V ugha Fks rFkk Hkzfer djus okys FksA ;g fd vkjksi rFkk vkjksi ds fooj.k ls dgh Hkh ;g Li"V ugha
gqvk fd izkFkhZ us fdl izdkj ls gkM+kSrh {ks=h; xzkeh.k cSad deZpkjh Q.M lsok fofu;eu] 1983 ds fu;e 19 dk mYya?ku fd;k gSA ftl
rFkkdfFkr /kujkf'k 10]000@&:- ds laca/k esa izkFkhZ ij vkjksi yxk;k x;k gS fd oks cSad dh lEifRr ugha Fkh muds laca/k esa izfri{kh cSad dks
dk;Zokgh djus dk dksbZ fof/kd vf/kd ugha FkkA fyfid lg jksdfM+;k dey tSu us cSad dk;Z fu;eksa dh fo:) cSad le; izkjEHk gksus ls iwoZ gh
10]000@&:- fdlh xzkgd ls dSls izkIr dj fy,A ;fn O;fDrxr O;ogkj ds :i esa izkIr dj fy, gks rks bl /kujkf'k dks cSad dh njkt esa
D;ksa j[kk x;k bl /kujkf'k dks [kqn vius ikl tek gksus rd j[kuk pkfg, FkkA mDr lEifRr 10]000@&:- ds Lokeh dk Jh ekud pUn xqIrk
vFkok muds }kjk dey tSu ftls oks jkf'k cSad esa tek djus gsrq lkSaih x;h Fkh] mudh vkSj ls dksbZ Hkh f'kdk;r pksjh ds laca/k esa dgha Hkh
izLrqr ugha dh xbZA ftlds dkj.k vkjksi i= nsus dk dksbZ vk/kkj gh izfri{kh ds ikl ugha FkkA mDr 10]000@&:- pksjh tkus ij Hkh ckjka 'kk[kk
izca/kd o ftlds ikl ls pksjh x,] mlds }kjk pksjh dh fjiksVZ Fkkus esa ntZ u djkus dk dkj.k o Li"Vhdj.k cSad ds ikl ugha gS ftlds vk/kkj
ij vkjksi i= tkjh fd;k x;kA cSad }kjk fn- 09-05-96 dks xyrh ls uksV vkus dk izkFkhZ ls fy[kdj ysus ij Hkh ckj&ckj Kkiu nsus dk dkj.k
Hkh izfri{kh }kjk Li"V ugha gSA izfri{kh }kjk fn- 28-05-96 ds Kkiu ds rF; 4 Jh xqIrk dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd muds }kjk LosPNk iwoZd
vkjksi Lohdkj ugha fd, tkus ij gh foHkkxh; tkap dh tkoaxh] vr% Jh xqIrk vkjksi ds ckjs esa Li"V dFku djs dh vkjksi fo'ks"k mUgsa Lohdkj gS
;k ughaA mijksDr Kkiu ds rF; vius vki esa ncko ,oa ltsfVo rF; gS ftlds vk/kkj ij dh xbZ tkap fizslhiy vkWQ LVksil ds fo:) gSA
rFkk bl vk/kkj ij fn;k x;k vkjksi i= ,oa ml ij dh x;h tkap izHkko 'kwU; ¼Null & Void½ ,oa iw.kZ :i ls nwf"kr gSA fn- 28-05-96 ds
Kkiu vuqlkj tkap uk gksus ij Hkh bl Kkiu esa vafdr gksM+kSrh {ks=h; xzkeh.k cSad deZpkjh lsok o`) fofu;e] 1983 ds fu;e 19 dk mYya?ku
djuk fdl vk/kkj ij ekuk gSA izkFkhZ ds fo:) tkap gsrq fu;qDr tkap vf/kdkjh Jh ,l-vkbZ- gqlSu izkFkhZ ls bl dkj.k ls }s"k j[krs Fks D;ksafd
izkFkhZ iwoZ esa lacaf/kr deZpkjh laxBu dk lnL; Fkk] ftlds Jh ,l-vkbZ- gqlSu inkf/kdkjh FksA izkFkhZ }kjk ckj&ckj vkxzg djus ij Hkh izkFkhZ dh
vLoLFkrk ds dkj.k fdlh fpfdRlk lqfo/kk ;qDr LFkku ij izkFkhZ dk LFkkukUrj.k@inLFkkiu gsrq bl] deZpkjh laxBu }kjk izkFkhZ dh dksbZ enn
ugha djus ds dkj.k izkFkhZ dks mDr vkjksi i= fn, tkus ds ,d o"kZ iwoZ gh izkFkhZ us laxBu dh lnL;rk R;kx nh Fkh rFkk izkFkhZ fdlh Hkh
laxBu dk lnL; ugha jgk FkkA tkap vf/kdkjh us blh dkj.k ls fof/kiwoZd dksbZ tkap ugha dh] dsoy tkap dk;Zokgh dks Vkbi djokdj izkFkhZ ds
gLrk{kj djok fy, x,] tkap esa lquokbZ dk volj ugha fn;k x;k] tkap vf/kdkjh iwjh rjg ls vkSipkfjd ukVd ek= Fkh ,oa iw.kZ tkap
dk;Zokgh nwf"kr FkhA tks izHkko'kwU; ,oa fof/k fo:) gSA tkap dk;Zokgh izfri{kh ,oa tkap vf/kdkjh dh fefyHkxr ls >wBs vko'oklu o ok;nk
f[kykQh d`R; djds vko'oklu o Hkjksls esa izkFkhZ dks j[kds dh xbZ FkhA tkap nqHkkZouk ls dh gqbZ gS tks fof/k fo:) gSA vuQ;sj gS tkap
izHkko'kwU; gSA Jh ds-,y- esgrk ,oa Jh dey pUn tSu viuh viuh ;wfu;u esa izkFkhZ dks 'kkfey djus esa vlQy jgus ls izkFkhZ ls }S"krk
j[krs Fks] bld dkj.k os izkFkhZ dks tcjnLrh fn- 09-05-96 dh ?kVuk esa Qalk;kA fnukad 09-05-96 dks cSad vf/kdkjh Jh ds-,y- esgrk ,oa Jh ch-
,y- jkor }kjk izkFkhZ ls izkIr dh xbZ fyf[kr Lohd`fr dks tkap esa dHkh izLrqr ugha fd;k x;k] uk gh izkFkhZ dks vkjksi i= ds lkFk mldh izfr
nh xbZ rFkk izkFkhZ ds fMizs'ku dk ykHk mBkrs gq, mlh ds vk/kkj ij ckn okyh Lohd`fr;ksa izkFkhZ ij ncko Mkydj ,oa izkFkhZ dks fo'okl Hkjkslk
fnyokdj Lohd`fr;ka cSad vf/kdkfj;ksa }kjk izkIr dh xbZA bl egRoiw.kZ izys[k fn- 09-05-96 ds vHkko esa izkFkhZ ds fo:) dkbZ Hkh dnkpj.k dk
vkjksi fl) gh ugha gskrk gSa Lo;a izfri{kh ,oa cSad ds lHkh vf/kdkjh fn- 09-05-96 ls n.M fn, tkus ds iwoZ rd yxkrkj ;g vko'oklu nsrs jgs
fd izkFkhZ dks dsoy psrkouh nsdj eqDr dj fn;k tkosxk vkSj blh vko'olu ds vUrxZr izkFkhZ dh Lohd`fr;ka izkir dh xbZA ftudk dksbZ vFkZ
ugha gS izfri{kh ,oa vU; cSad vf/kdkfj;ksa dk d`R; nqHkkZoukiw.kZ] >wBs vko'olu nsus o fo'okl esa ysus dk jgk gS mlds vk/kkj ij dh xbZ leLr
vukf/kd`r rkSj ij dh xbZ dk;Zokgh fof/k fo:) gSA izfri{kh ,oa muds cSad vf/kdkjh }kjk fd;k x;k d`R; izkFkhZ dks lafo/kku }kjk iznRr ewy
vf/kdkjksa ds fo:) gS ,oa lafo/kku ds vkfVZdy 14 ,oa 16 x Li"V mYya?ku gSA fn- 09-05-96 dks izkFkhZ us fyf[kr Lohd`fr izkFkhZ ds fo:)
iqfyl dk;Zokgh dh /kedh nsdj izkIr dh xbZ gS rFkk mDr ?kVuk dks xaHkhj vijk/k ekurs gq, izkFkhZ dks cxSj fdlh U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; ,oa
iqfyl dk;Zokgh ds izkFkhZ ds fo:) dh xbZ leLr dk;Zokgh dk dksbZ fof/kd vFkZ ugha gSA izkFkhZ ds fo:) izkFkhZ Lo;a dh Lohd`fr ds vfrfjDr
dksbZ lk{; ugha gSA tkap ds nkSjku vkjksi flf) gsrq izfri{kh dh vksj ls dksbZ lk{; Hkh izLrqr ugha ugha gS vkSj nLrkost Hkh ugha gS tkap
vf/kdkjh dh fjiksVZ cxSj cSad lk{; ds vHkko esa izHkko'kwU;] fof/kfo:) ,oa nwf"kr gSA fn- 09-05-96 dks izkFkhZ dh 'kk[kk dh ryk'kh fy, tkus ij
iwoZr% ;g tkudkjh ugha Fkh fd mlds ikl 10]000@&:- =qfVo'k vk x, gS] blesa mldh =qfV ek= bruh Fkh] fd mlus ckjka 'kk[kk ds jksdfM+;k
}kjk fyQkQs esa nh xbZ jkf'k dks [kksydj ugha fxuk vkSj f'k?kZrk ds dkj.k viuh 'kk[kk esa Hkh ugha fxuk vkSj 'kk[kk dk;Z izkjEHk dj fn;kA ;g
lc cSad xzkgdksa dks vPNh lsok esa iznku djus ds dze esa gqvkA mDr =qfV /;ku esa vkrs gh mls izkFkhZ us Lohdkj fd;kA bl izdkj izkFkhZ us dksbZ
dnkpkj ugha fd;k vksj tks ekewy =qVh gqbZ gS mldk n.M psrkouh ls vf/kd fdlh Hkh izdkj ls ugha gks ldrk gSA bl izdkj izkFkhZ dks fn;k
x;k n.M izkFkhZ dh =qfV ds vuq:i ugha gSA fjdkWMZ ij miyC/k lk{; ,oa izkFkhZ dh Lohd`fr;ksa ls izkFkhZ dk dksbZ nqjk'; mDr jkf'k dks viuk
cuk ysus dk Li"V ugha gqvk gS ;gka rd fd mDr jkf'k izkFkhZ ds ikl ls ugha vfirq cSad ds dks"k ls cjken dh xbZ Fkh] ,slh voLFkk esa Hkh izkFkhZ
ds fo:) "kM+;a= iw.kZ d`R; djds mDr voLFkk esa izkFkhZ ds fo:) fdlh Hkh nqjkpj.k dksbZ vkjksi u gksrs gq, Hkh izkFkhZ dks nf.Mr fd;k gSA Jh
,l-vkbZ- gqlSu tkap vf/kdkjh ds }kjk dh xbZ tkap U;k; ds uSlfxZd fl)kar ds fo:) gS muds }kjk vU; dbZ ekeysksa esa dh xbZ nwf"kr tkap ds
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1113
ekeys dbZ U;k;ky;ksa esa yafcr gSA tkap esa vkjksiska dk fl) djus dk Hkkj izca/kd dk Fkk] blfy, tkap ds igys lk{k vkjksikas dh izekf.kr djus
gsrq izca/kd gsrq izca/kd i{k dks is'k djuk Fkk tks ugha djkbZ rFkk tkap vf/kdkjh dk d`R; nwf"kr ,oa izca/kd ls feyhHkxr dk jgk gS tks fof/k ds
vuq:i vFkZghu gSA izkFkhZ ds fo:) ikfjr n.Mkns'k ,oa izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr dh xbZ vihy esa ikfjr fu.kZ; ,d gh vf/kdkjh ds }kjk fd, x, gS
tks fof/k fo:) gSa bl izdkj vihy dh lquokbZ dk vf/kdkj ,oa ikfjr n.M fu.kZ; dk vf/kdkjh] izfri{kh dks ugh agSA izca/kd }kjk izkFkhZ dks
lsok ls inP;wr fd, tkus dk n.M vR;ar dBksj gS rFkk izkFkhZ dk fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 11 ¼,½ dh ifjf/k esa vkrk gS ftlds vUrxZr
vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/kdj.k dks izkFkhZ dks fn, x, n.M dks de djus vFkok lekIr djus dk iw.kZ vf/kdkj gSA izfri{kh dk lEiw.kZ d`R; cSad fu;eksa
ds foijhr jgk gS ,oa vkfcZVªsjh jgk gS tks izkd`frd U;k; ds fl)karksa ds fo:) gS vkSj izkFkZuk dh gS fd izkFkhZ ,d odZeSu gS rFkk mls inP;wrh
dk n.M fn;k tkuk mfpr ,oa oS/k ugha gS rFkk izkFkhZ fiNys iwjs osru lfgr lsok esa cgkyh dk vuqrks"k iznku fd;k tkosA
4&
vizkFkhZ fu;kstd dh vksj ls mDr Dyse dk tokc izLrqr dj ;g izfrokn fd;k x;k gS fd izkFkhZ dh fu;qfDr izfri{kh cSad }kjk
gkM+kSrh {ks=h; xzkeh.k cSad ¼LVkQ lfoZl jsxqys'ku½ ds vUrxZr fu;qfDr i= fn- 26-10-86 ds }kjk {ks= i;Zos{kd ds in ij dh xbZ o ckn esa
inkSUur fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ dks 'kk[kk esy[ksM+h esa 'kk[kk izca/kd ds in ij inLFkkfir fd;k FkA izfri{kh cSad xzkeh.k cSad gS] rFkk xzkeh.k vapy esa
ukxfjdksa dh jkf'k NksVh&NksVh tek djus rFkk ukxfjdksa dks _.k lqfo/kk miyC/k djkus ds fu;r ls de [kpZ ds vk/kkj ij ¼O;olkf;d cSadksa ds
eqdkcys½ gh izfri{kh cSad dk xBu gqvk gSA izfri{kh cSad }kjk vius ifji= la- 64 fn- 10-06-88 }kjk cSad ds vf/kdkjh] {ks= i;Zos{kd] 'kk[kk
izca/kd ds dk;ksZ ds laca/k esa tkjh fd;k gqvk gSA izkFkhZ dks 'kk[kk izca/kd ds in ij leLr izca/kdh;] rFkk lqijokbtjh 'kfDr;ksa izkIr FkhA
izfri{kh cSad esa leLr vf/kdkfj;ksa dk dk;Z {ks= o 'kfDr;ksa fHkUu&2 in dh ofj"Brk o xfjek ds vuq:i gSA izkFkhZ dks esy[ksM+h 'kk[kk izca/kd ds
in ij izfri{kh cSad ds mDr ifji= la- 64 fn- 10-06-88 ds vUrxZr dk;Z o 'kfDr;ksa fufgr Fkh izkFkhZ blds foijhr vU; dFku djus ls ckf/kr
gS ;g Lohdkj ugha gS fd izkFkhZ }kjk fd, tkus okys leLr dk;Z fyfidh; dk;Z gksA izkFkhZ us mDr ifji= esa of.kZr 'kk[kk izca/kd ds leLr
dk;ksZa dks izca/kdh;&lqijokbZtjh gSfl;r ls dk;Z fd;k gSA izkFkhZ blds foijhr vU; dFku djus ls ckf/kr gS oSls Hkh 'kk[kk izca/kd in ds dk;ksZa
ds lkFk ;fn dksbZ vU; dk;Z cSad dh vko';drk ds vuqlkj izkFkhZ }kjk fd, x, gS] rks mlls izkFkhZ ds 'kk[kk izca/kd vf/kdkjh ds in ds foijhr
vU; dk;Z ugha ekus tk ldrs gSA izfri{kh cSad esa leLr 'kk[kk izca/kdksa dks mDr ifji= ds vuqlkj 'kk[kk izca/kd in ij fd, tkus okys dk;ksZa
o 'kfDr;ksa dk fooj.k gSA izkFkhZ odZeSu dh ifjHkk"kk esa ugha vkrk gSA izkFkhZ rRdkyhu 'kk[kk izca/kd ds in ij fu;qDr Fkk rFkk 'kk[kk izca/kd in
dh leLr vf/kdkjh 'kfDr;ksa o dk;ksZa dks izkFkhZ us vatke fn;k gSA izkFkhZ blds foijhr vU; dFku djus ls ckf/kr gSA izkFkhZ dk fn- 09-05-96 dks
ckjka 'kk[kk eas jkf'k izkIr djus gsrq mifLFkr gksuk Lohdkj gSA ysfdu izkFkhZ }kjk fn- 09-05-96 dks ckjka 'kk[kk 20]000@&:- dh jkf'k gh ewy
okmpj ¼30]000@&:- dks dkVdj 20]000@&½ djrs gq, izkIr dh Fkh tks izkFkhZ dks nh xbZ FkhA ysfdu bl izdj.k ls lacaf/kr okLrfod rF;
bl izdkj gS fd fn- 09-05-96 dks 'kk[kk ckjka esa izkr% 9-45 ij Jh xqIrk 'kk[kk i=kad Lis- 09-05-96 ds vuqlkj gkFk uxnh 30]000@&:- ys tkus
ds fy, mifLFkr Fks rFkk fyfid Jh dey tSu dh Vscy ds ikl cSBs FksA fn- 09-05-96 dks izkr% 9-45 ij 'kk[kk ckjka esa vks-Mh- [kkrk 36 /kkjd
Jh ek.kdpUn xqIrk vius [kkrs esa 10]000@& ewY; oxZ ¼ 50X200½ tek djokus vk,A mDr jkf'k Jh dey tSu] fyfid ckjka dks lkSi dj
pys x,A Jh ;nqoa'kh] jksdfM+;k ds 'kk[kk esa vkus ij Jh dey tSu }kjk viuh njkt tgka mUgksaus 10]000@&:- j[ks Fks] mDr jkf'k Jh ;nqoa'kh
dks nsus gsrq [kksyh] rks ogka ij mDr jkf'k ekStwn ugha FkhA rqjar leLr 'kk[kk LVkQ us mDr jkf'k [kkst dh] ijUrq jkf'k dk dgh irk ugha pykA
xqe gqbZ jkf'k ds ryk'kh ds nkSjku Jh oh-ih- xqIrk }kjk mudh okafNr uxnh 30]000@&:i;s dks dkVdj 20]000@&:- dj fy;k x;k] lkFk gh
uxnh ds Hkqxrku okmpj ij Hkh 30]000@&:- dks dkVdj 20]000@&:- dj fy;k x;kA 20]000@&:- dh jkf'k ysdj Jh oh-ih- xqIrk 'kk[kk ls
tkus yxs rks 'kk[kk izca/kd ckjka }kjk mUgsa jksdk x;k fd xqe gqbZ jkf'k ds irk yxus rd os 'kk[kk ls izLFkku djs] ijUrq blds ckotwn Hkh izkFkhZ
}kjk 'kk[kk ls esy[ksM+h gsrq izLFkku fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ ds bl rjg izLFkku djus ls mRiUu gq, lansg ds dkj.k 'kk[kk izca/kd Jh esgrk rFkk Jh
jkor] iz/kku dk;kZy; vf/kdkjh }kjk 'kk[kk esy[ksM+h dk Hkze.k fd;k x;k rFkk muds }kjk jfuax gkFk udnh dh tkap djus ij ik;k x;k fd
10]000@&:- dh jkf'k ewY; oxZ ¼50X200½ vf/kd FkhA iwNrkN ds nkSjku izkFkhZ 'kk[kk izca/kd esy[ksM+h }kjk fyf[kr esa Lohdkj fd;k x;k fd
mDr jkf'k 10]000@&:- ¼50X200½ xyrh ls muds lkFk vk xbZ FkhA mDr jkf'k izkFkhZ us izca/kd] ckjka Jh esgrk dks lkSai nhA izkjafHkd tkap ds
laca/k esa izkFkhZ dks Kkiu dzekad 88 fn- 13-05-96 fn;k tkuk ,oa Kkiu esa of.kZr rF; ek= Lohdkj gSA izkFkhZ }kjk 'kk[kk izca/kd esy[ksM+h esa :i
esa mDr Kkiu dzekad fn- 13-05-96 dk tokc 20-05-96 dks 'kk[kk dofjax ysVj dzekad 37 fn- 20-05-96 }kjk izfri{kh ds iz/kku dk;kZy; dks Hkstk
x;kA izkFkhZ ds fo:) foHkkxh; dk;Zokgh fd, tkus ds laca/k esa fu;fer vkjksi i= Kkiu dzekad 115 fnukad 28-05-96 ds }kjk ifjf'k"V 1 esa
of.kZr vkjksi rFkk ifjf'k"V 2 esa of.kZr vkjksiksa dk fooj.k izkFkhZ dks Hkstk x;k FkkA izkFkhZ us mijksDr vkjksi i= dzekad 155 fn- 28-05-96 dk
mRrj fn- 05-06-96 dks Lo;a izkFkhZ us 'kk[kk izca/kd esy[ksM+h dh gSfl;r ls i= dzekad 54 fn- 05-06-96 dks fHktok;k FkkA vkjksi i= ds laca/k esa
foHkkxh; tkap dk;Zokgh gsrq vkns'k fn- 07-06-96 }kjk Jh ,l- vkbZ- gqlSu {ks= izca/kd dks tkap vf/kdkjh fu;qDr fd;k x;k o ,d ekg esa
QkbfMax izLrqr djus dks dgk x;kA Jh ,l-vkbZ- gqlSu }kjk U;k; ds lkekU; fl)karksa ,oa uSlfxZad U;k; dh ikyuk djrs gq, tkap dk;Zokgh
dhA tkap vf/kdkjh }kjk fn- 06-07-96 dks tkap dk;Zokgh LFkku {ks=h; dk;kZy; ckjka esa izkr% 10 cts dk le; fu/kkZfjr fd;k tkus dh lwpuk
izkFkhZ dh nh Fkh] fn- 06-07-96 dks izkr% 11-30 cts {ks= dk;kZy; ckjka esa tkap vf/kdkjh }kjk izkFkhZ cpko izfrfuf/k dh lgk;rk izkIr djus ds
laca/k esa Hkh lykg nh Fkh] ysfdu izkFkhZ fdlh dks cpko izfrfuf/k ds :i esa lgk;rk izkIr ugha djus dh bPNk O;fDr dh Fkh rFkk viuk i{k Lo;a
izLrqr djus dk dFku fd;kA izkFkhZ dks vkjksi i= i<+dj lquk;k x;k] rFkk izkFkhZ tkap vf/kdkjh }kjk vkjksi esa of.kZr vkjksiksa dks Hkyh&Hkkafr
le>us ds ckjs esa iz'u djus ij izkFkhZ us vkjksiksa dks Hkyh Hkkafr le> fy, tkus dk dFku fd;k Fkk] rRi'pkr vkjksi i= esa of.kZr vkjksiksa dks
Lohdkj vFkok vLohdkj djus ds tkap vf/kdkjh ds iz'u ij izkFkhZ us vkjksi i= esa of.kZr vkjksiksa dks Lohdkj djus dk dFku fd;k FkkA pwafd
izkFkhZ }kjk vkjksi i= esa of.kZr vkjksiksa dks le> dj iw.kZr;k Lohdkj dj fy;k Fkk rnuqlkj tkap vf/kdkjh }kjk tkap dk;Zokgh esa vkxs dksbZ
dk;Zokgh dh vko';drk u ekurs gq, viuk tkap dk;Zokgh fooj.k] fjiksVZ QkbfMax] vuq'kklfud izkf/kdkjh dks izLrqr djus ckcr rF;ksa dks Hkh
tkap dk;Zokgh vknsf'kdk 06-07-96 esa of.kZr fd, FkkA lEiw.kZ tkap dk;Zokgh fooj.k dks Lohdkj djrs gq, izkFkhZ oh-ih- xqIrk us vius gLrk{kj Hkh
fd, FksA izkFkhZ blds foijhr vU; dFku djus ls ckf/kr gSA tkap vf/kdkjh }kjk fn 06-07-96 dks tkap izksflfMaXl ds lkFk viuh tkap fjiksVZ
vuq'kklfud vf/kdkjh dks fn- 08-07-96 dks izLrqr dh Fkh] vuq'kklfud vf/kdkjh v/;{k }kjk vius i= dze 567 fn- 14-10-96 }kjk tkap
vf/kdkjh dh fjiksVZ izkFkhZ dks fHktokrs gq, izkFkhZ ls vkifRr oDrO; vUnj 10 ;kse nsus gsrq funsZ'k fn, Fks] ftldk tokc izkFkhZ us fn- 26-10-96 dks
nsrs gq, tkap vf/kdkjh dh tkap QkbZfMax ds fo:) dksbZ vkifRr izLrqr ugha dh] oju~ izkFkhZ}kjk vkjksi i= esa of.kZr vkjksi] nqjkpj.k dks
1114
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Lohdkj djrs gq, vkRe Xykuh o {kek;kpuk dk dFku fd;k FkkA izfri{kh ds vuq'kklfud vf/kdkjh }kjk vkns'k fn- 27-11-96 }kjk izLrkfor n.M
dh lwpuk nsrs gq, inP;qfr ds laca/k esa izkFkhZ dks O;fDrxr lquokbZ dk volj iznku djrs gq, lquokbZ dh rkjh[k 16-12-96 izkr% 11 cts iz/kku
dk;kZy; esa fu;r fd;k FkkA izkFkhZ }kjk izLrkfor n.M ds laca/k esa O;fDrxr lquokbZ gsrq chekjh ds vk/kkj ij ckj&ckj le; ysuk o i= fy[kk
Lohdkj gSA ysfdu ;g Lohdkj ugha gS fd rFkkdfFkr izLrkfor n.M dh lwpuk ls izkFkhZ dks osnuk vFkok vk?kkr yxk gksA izLrkfor n.M ds
laca/k esa O;fDrxr lquokbZ gsrq izkFkhZ dks vuq'kklfud vf/kdkjh ds le{k 22-02-97 dks mifLFkr gksuk Lohdkj gSA fnukad 22-02-97 dks v/;{k d{k
iz/kku dk;kZy; dksVk esa izkr% 11 cts izLrkfor n.M ds laca/k esa O;fDrxr lquokbZ dk dk;Zokgh fooj.k fy[kk x;k Fkk rFkk lEiw.kZ dk;Zokgh
fooj.k dks i<+ dj o lgh ekudj mlds }kjk fd, x, dnkpkj ds laca/k esa {kek ekaxrs gq, izLrkfor n.M ds laca/k esa lgkuqHkwfr iwoZd fopkj
djus dh izkFkZuk dh Fkh rFkk dk;Zokgh fooj.k ij vius gLrk{kj fd, FksA vuq'kklfud vf/kdkjh }kjk izkFkhZ }kjk fd, x, vijksDr nqjkpj.k
vkjksi i= esa of.kZr vkjksiksa ds laca/k esa mijksDr of.kZr leLr izfdz;k iw.kZ djus ds ckn ,oa lq{kerk o xgurk ls voyksdu o fopkj djus ds
ckn vafre vkns'k fn- 08-04-97 dks ikfjr djrs gq,] inP;qfr ds n.M ls izkFkhZ dks nf.Mr fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ dks mDr n.Mkns'k dofjax i= la-
18 fn- 08-04-97 ds lkFk fn;k FkkA izkFkhZ dofjax ysVj Kkiu dze 18 fn- 08-04-97 ds tokc esa vihy cksMZ esa djus dh bPNk O;Dr djrs gq,
fn- 21-04-97 dks ,d i= izfri{kh dks fn;k FkkA izkFkhZ }kjk lapkyd e.My gkM+kSrh {ks=h; xzkeh.k cSad dks vihy izLrqr dh gSA izkFkhZ dh vihy
ij funs'kd e.My izfri{kh cSad }kjk 15-10-97 dks vk;ksftr cSBd esa xaHkhjrk vkjksi ij xgjkbZ ls fopkj foe'kZ djrs gq, vuq'kklukRed
izkf/kdkjh }kjk inP;qfr ds i.M dh iqf"V djrs gq, izkFkhZ dh vihy dks [kkfjt dj fn;k x;k] ftldh lwpuk izkFkhZ dks izfri{kh cSad
}kjk fn- 06-11-97 ds i= ls nh nh xbZ FkhA funs'kd e.My }kjk vius vf/kdkj {ks= ds vUrxZr vihy ds leLr igyqvksa] fcUnqvksa dks dUlhMj
djrs gq, fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k x;k] ftlds foijhr dFku djus ls izkFkhZ ckf/kr gSA vkjksi i= esa of.kZr vkjksi Li"V Fks rFkk izkFkhZ }kjk fdlh Hkh
le; iwoZ esa fdlh Hkh izdkj dh dksbZ vkifrr Hkzkedrk ds laca/k esa ugha mBkbZ gS rnuqlkj izkFkhZ vU; dFku djus ls ,LVkWIM gSA oSls Hkh izkFkhZ
}kjk vkjksi i= esa of.kZr vkjksiksa dks vusd voljksa ij Lohdkj fd;k gqvk gSA vkjksi i= esa of.kZr vkjksi Li"Vr% lsok fofu;eksa ds vUrxZr
mYya?ku dh ifjHkk"kk esa rFkk dnkpkj dh ifjHkk"kk esa vkrk gSA izkFkhZ vius iwoZ vkpj.k ds foijhr vU; dFku djus ls ckf/kr gSA rFkkdfFkr
10]000@&:- dk jkf'k ckjka 'kk[kk ds fyfid lg jksdfM+;k dks [kkrk /kkjd ekudpUn xqIrk us tek djkus gsrq lkSaih Fkh rFkk ;g jkf'k ckjka
'kk[kk esa ckjka 'kk[kk ifjlj esa viuh Vscy dh njkt esa j[kh FkhA rnuqlkj bl jkf'k dk laca/k cSad ,oa cSad dh izfr"Bk ,oa dk;Z iz.kkyh ls rFkk
cSad vf/kdkjh dh lk[k ls laca/k Fkk rnuqlkj izfri{kh dks rFkkdfFkr vkjksi ds laca/k esa dk;Zokgh djus dk iw.kZ vf/kdkj gSA oSls Hkh izkFkhZ }kjk
vkjksi i= esa of.kZr vkjksiksa dks fcuk fdlh vojks/k ds LosPNk iwoZd Lohdkj dj fy;k gS] rFkk fyf[kr esa Lohdkj fd;k gS rFkk vius dnkpkj ds
d`R; ds fy, {kek ;kpuk dh gSA vkjksi i= fof/kor :i ls izkFkhZ dks fn;k x;k Fkk] fof/kor~ :i ls tkap dh xbZ FkhA izR;sd izdj.k esa iqfyl
esa fjiksVZ djkuk dkuwuu vko';d ugha gS rFkk rFkkdfFkr izdj.k dh iqfyl esa fjiksVZ u djkus ls izkFkhZ dks fn, x, vkjksi i= esa of.kZr vkjksi
dh rhozrk vFkok dk;Zokgh tkap ,oa n.Mkns'k ij dksbZ foijhr izek.k ugha iM+rk gSA vkjksi i= iw.kZr;k Li"V Fkk rFkk izkFkhZus nqjkj.k dh LOhdkj
fd;k gSA izfri{kh cSad }kjk U;k; ds uSlfxZd lkekU; fl)karksa ds vuq:i izkjfEHkd tkap Kkiu fnukad 13-05-96 ds tokc fn, x, izkFkhZ ds
LohdkjksfDr nqjkpj.k ;qDr ds mijkar Hkh fof/kor~ fu;fer vkjksi i= fn- 28-05-96 dks izkFkhZ fn;k] bl vkjksi i= ds tokc fn- 05-06-96 esa Hkh
vkjksiksa dks v{kjr% Li"V :i ls izkFkhZ us vius tokc esa Lohdkj fd;k gS] rFkk Lo;a dks xqukgxkj o cSad dk vijk/kh ekuk gSA blds mijkar Hkh
izfri{kh cSad }kjk U;k; ds lkekU; fl)karksa o uSlfxZd U;k; gsrq tkap vf/kdkjh dks fu;qDr dj vkjksi i= ds laca/k esa tkap dk;Zokgh djokbZ
rFkk tkap vf/kdkjh ds le{k tkap dk;Zokgh ds nkSjku izkFkhZ vkjsi i= esa of.kZr vkjksiksa dks Lohdkj djus dh QkbZfMax ds ckn gh fof/kor~ :i ls
tkap vf/kdkjh dh QkbZfMaXl dks izkFkhZ dks Hkstrs gq,] tkap vf/kdkjh dh QkbZfMax ds laca/k esa vkifRr;ka izfri{kh }kjk ekaxh Fkh] ysfdu izkFkhZ dksbZ
vkifRr u djus ij fof/kor~ :i ls izLrkfor n.M dh lwpuk nsrs gq, izLrkfor n.M ds laca/k esa U;k; ds uSlfxZd fl)karksa ds vuq:i izkFkhZ dks
O;fDrxr lquokbZ dk volj fn;k x;k] rRi'pkr fof/kor~ :i ls leLr rF;ksa dks dUlhMj djrs gq, izkFkhZ dks inP;qfr dk vafre n.Mkns'k
fn;k x;k izfri{kh cSad o mlds leLr vf/kdkfj;ksa dh lk[k gksrh gS] cSad o cSad ds vf/kdkjh ifCyd euh dh Mhfyax djrs gS rnuqlkj cSad ds
izR;sd vf/kdkjh o deZpkjh ls cSad jkf'k vFkok vU; fdlh O;fDr dh jkf'k dh pksjh djus vFkok xk;c djus vFkok fcuk vuqefr mBkus] ys
tkus] vkfn ds leLr d`R; xaHkhj nqjkpj.k dh ifjHkk"kk esa vkrs gS rFkk ,sls nqjkpjk ds laca/k esa ftlls lEiw.kZ cSad dh Nfo gh lekIr gks tko]
rFkk mldh Nfo ij foijhr izHkko iM+s] izLrqr izdj.k ds rF;ksa esa inP;qfr ls de dk n.M U;k; iw.kZ ugha gksrk gS vkSj u ekuk tkuk pkfg,A
;g Hkh vfHkdfFkr fd;k gS fd izkFkhZ Lo;a izca/kd gS tks Jfed dh ifjHkk"kk esa ugha vkrk gS] bl dkj.k vf/kfu;e izkFkhZ ds laca/k esa ykxw ugha
gksrk gS bl dkj.k U;k;kf/kdj.k dks izfri{kh 'kk[kk izca/kd dks rRdkyhu dks fn, x, n.Mkns'k ds laca/k esa fopkj djus dk vFkok n.M dks de
djus dk vf/kdkj gh ugha gSA vkSj izkFkZuk dh gS fd Dyse fujk/kkj gksus ls lO;; fujLr fd;k tkosA
5&
lk{; esa izkFkhZ dh vksj ls Lo;a ,oa vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls dUgS;kyky ds 'kiFk&i= izLrqr gq, ftu ij ijLij ftjg dh x;hA mHk;i{k
dh vksj ls nLrkosth lk{; Hkh izLrqr dh x;h ftldk ;Fkkle; mYys[k fd;k tkosxkA
6&
mHk;i{k dh cgl lquh xbZ tks mudh vksj ls izLrqr vius vH;kosnu ds vuq:i gh gS ,oa izkFkhZ izfruf/k dk rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZ dks
vizkFkhZ us fu;qDr i= fnukad 26-10-83 }kjk i;Zos{kd ds in ij fu;ksftr fd;k ,oa fn- 13-05-87 ds vkns'k }kjk fn- 10-02-86 ls {ks= i;Zos{kd
ds in ij LFkkbZ dj fn;k rFkk fn- 02-01-92 ds vkns'k ls 'kk[kk esMksyk esa izca/kd ds in ij inLFkkfir fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ dks izca/kdh; rFkk
lqijokbtjh 'kfDr;ka izkIr ugha Fkh] izkFkhZ dk dk;Z eq[;r% fyfidh; izd`fr dk FkkA izkFkhZ esy[ksM+h 'kk[kk ds ds'k VªkatsD'ku esa xzkgdksa dks iSlk
nsuk o mudk iSlk tek djus] [kkrs [kksyuk] [kksyus ds QkeZ Hkjuk] iSlk tek djokus o fudyokus ds okmpj cukuk] okmpjksa dk fy[kuk]
iksfLVax [kkskrsa esa djuk] jksdM+ ds'k cqd fy[kuk] Ms&cqd fy[kuk] tuZy Ms&cqd fy[kuk] lkIrkfgd] ikf{kd] ekfld] =S&ekfld] izfrosnu rS;kj
djukA le;≤ ij lwpuk rS;kj djuk] ekfld csysal ysuk] xzkgdksa ds [kkrksa dh jkf'k dk fjdUlhys'ku djuk] uksV fxuuk] xM~Mh cukuk]
x<~<h cukdj isdsV cukuk] cSysal feykuk] MªkQ~V cukuk] cSysal rS;kj djuk] Mkd rS;kj djuk jftLVj esa p<+kuk] jftLVMZ Mkd dk vyx ls
bUnzkt djuk] Mkd Hsktuk] ckgj ls vkbZ Mkd izkir djuk mls vkod jftLVj esa ap<+kuk] Mkd dks fMCcs esa Mkyuk] Mkd ?kj esa tkdj Mkd dh
jftLVh djkuk] mPp vf/kdkfj;ksa }kjk fjVuZ ekaxus ij fjVuZ nsukA xzkgdksa dks vR;f/kd jkf'k dk Hkqxrku djus gsrq vU; cSadksa dh 'kk[kk ls iSlk
ysus tkus dk dk;Z] rFkk vR;f/kd iSlk cSad esa xzkgdksa dk tek gksus ij ckjksa 'kk[kk esa tek djus tkuk] ys[kk nLrkost o jsdkWMZ j[kuk] okmpj
Qk;y djuk] LVkWd jftLVj esusVsu djuk] vkfn dk;Z eq[;r% izkFkhZ dks jkstkuk djuk iM+rk FkkA izkFkhZ dh vksj ls tks vizkFkhZ ls nLrkost ryc
djok, tkus dk izkFkZuk i= fn- 15-06-2001 izLrqr fd;k x;k Fkk bu nLrkostksa ls izkFkhZ ds vU; dk;Z@fyfidh; izd`fr ds dk;Z djus ds iqf"V
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1115
gksrh bl izkFkZuk i= ds tokc vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls ts-ih- feJk us 'kiFk i= fn- 20-10-2001 dks izLrqr dj ;g Lohdkj fd;k x;k gS fd izkFkhZ us
'kk[kk izca/kd ds in ds dk;Z ds vfrfjDr vU; okafNr dk;Z o izfof"V;ka cSad esa j[ks x, okafNr jftLVj vkfn esa dh gSa bl LohdkjksfDr i= bl
U;k;kf/kdj.k }kjk vkns'k fn- 16-09-2002 ikfjr fd;k x;k gSA izn'kZ MCY;w 97 esa 'kk[kk izca/kd ds dk;Z of.kZr gSa] ysfdu vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls ts-
ih- feJk us 'kiFk i= eas of.kZrkuqlkj LohdkjksfDr ,oa vkns'k fn- 16-09-2002 ls Li"V gS fd izkFkhZ 'kk[kk izca/kd ds dk;Z ds vykok vU; dk;Z
djrk FkkA ftlls ;g fl) gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2 ¼,l½ ds vUrxZr ^^odZeSu^^ dh ifjHkk"kk esa vkrk gSA izkFkhZ dks ftu vkjksiksa ls
vkjksfir fd;k x;k gS muds ckjs esa izkFkhZ dks fo'okl esa ysdj mlls vkjksi dks Lohdkj djok;k x;k gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ dks bu vkjksiksa Lohdkj
dj ysrk gS rks mls nf.Mr ugha fd;k tk,xk vFkok ekQh ekaxus ij ekQ dj fn;k tk,xkA izkFkhZ ds fo:) tks tkap dh xbZ gS mlesa mlds
c;ku ys[kc) ugha fd, x, gS ,oa vizkFkhZ foHkkx ds ftu vf/kdkfj;ksa us izkFkhZ ij xcu ds vkjksi yxk, Fks vizkFkhZ us mu vf/kdkfj;ksa ds c;ku
foHkkxh; dk;Zokgh esa is'k ugha fd;k gS] blds vHkko esa foHkkxh; tkap esa izkd`frd U;k; ds uSlfxZd fl)kar dh ikyuk ugha dh xbZ gS vkSj uk gh
vkjksi dh xokg ds vHkko esa iqf"V gks ldrh gS ,oa mls lsok P;qr dk tks n.M fn;k x;k gS og voS/k ,oa vuqfpr gS blfy, izkFkhZ lsok esa iquZLFkkiuk dk
vf/kdkjh gS ysfdu D;ksafd izkFkhZ fjVk;jesaV dh vof/k ikj dk pqdk gS blfy, lsoke`fDr dh fnukad ls fjVk;jesaV rd dk osru o leLr vuqxkeh ykHkksa dks
izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh gSA izkFkhZ izfrfuf/k dh vksj ls vius dFkuksa ds leFkZu esa fuEu U;kf;d n`"Vkar izLrqr fd, x, gS&
1.
Syndicate Bank Ltd. Vs. Workmen- 1966 II LLT 194 (SC),
2.
National Engineerng Industries Ltd. Vs. Shree Shreekishan Bhagriya and Other-Dt. 11 Nov. 1987 (SC),
3.
S.K. Verma Vs. Mahesh Chandra and Another- (1983) 4 SCC 214,
4.
Union of India & others Vs. Gyan Chand Chattar- (2009) 12 SCC 78,
5.
Kuldeep Singh Vs. Commissioner of Police and Others-(1999) 2 SCC 10,
6.
Anant R. Kulkarni Vs. Y.P. Education Society and Others- (2013) 6 SCC 515,
7.
The Workmen of M/s Firestone Tyre & Rubber Co. Vs. The Management and Others- AIR 1973 SC 1227,
8.
Jorsingh Govind Vanjari Vs. Divisional Controller Maharashtra, State Road Transport Corporation,
Jalgaon Div- AIR 2017 SC 57,
9.
Natavarbhai S. Makwana Vs. Unio Bank of India And Others-(Gujraj HC) Dt. 22-03-1984,
10.
Hardwari Lal Vs. State of U.P. and others- AIR 2000 SC 277,
11.
Uion of India And Other Vs. B.V. Gopinath- (2014) 1 SCC 351,
12.
Raj Kishore Jha Vs. State of Bihar and Others- (2003) 11 SCC 519,
13.
S.C. Girotra Vs. United Commercial Bank- 1995 Supp (3) SCC 212,
izkFkhZ izfrfuf/k ds dFkuksa ds [k.Mu esa vizkFkhZ izfrfuf/k dk ;g rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZ muds ;gka 'kk[kk izca/kd ds in ij dk;Zjr Fkk
,oa izkFkhZ }kjk eSustsfj;y dsisflVh@izca/kafd; izd`fr ds dk;Z gh fd, tkrs Fks ftudh iqf"V izn'kZ ,e 9 yxk;r 14 _.k Lohd`fr i=ksa] Hkqxrku
iwoZ tkap i= ,oa Hkqxrku i'pkr tkap lacaf/kr i=kas ij izkFkhZ 'kk[kk izca/kd ds , ls ch gLrk{kj gS tks mlus viuh ftjg esa Lohdkj fd;k gSA
_.k Lohd`fr o Hkqxrku iwoZ ,oa Hkqxrku i'pkr tkap djus tSls dk;Z dsoy ek= 'kk[kk izca/kd }kjk gh fd, tk ldrs gSA izkFkhZ }kjk tks
nLrkost izLrqr djokus dk izkFkZuk i= fn- 15-06-2001 is'k fd;k x;k Fkk mu lHkh nLrkostkr ij izfof'kf"V;ka izkFkhZ }kjk gh dh xbZ gS D;ksafd
ml le; izkFkhZ dh 'kk[kk esa og ,oa lans'k okgd gh dk;Zjr Fks vU; dksbZ deZpkjh ugha Fks] 'kk[kk esa vU; dksbZ fyfid ;k lqijokbZtj ugh gksus
ls vU; dk;Z Hkh izkkFkhZ }kjk gh fd, tkrs Fks ysfdu izkFkhZ dk in 'kk[kk izca/kd dk gh Fkk] ftldh iqf"V izn'kZ ,e 9 yxk;r 14 ls gksrh gS
blfy, izkFkhZ vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2¼,l½ ds vUrxZr deZdkj dh ifjHkk"kk esa ugha vkrk gSA izkFkhZ ij 10]000@&:- pksjh dk tks vkjksi Fkk ml
ckcr ?kVuk LFky ij izn'kZ ,e 5 o ,e 6 }kjk izkFkhZ us viuh xyrh dks ekuk gS] izkFkhZ us vius i= fn- 20-05-96 esa ;g d`R; Lohdkj djrs gq,
fy[kk gS fd ^^mDr d`R; mldh cqf) Hkz"V gks tkus ls gqvk gS rFkk blds fy, eSa cgqr 'kfeZank gwaA esjs }kjk 'kk[kk ckjka ds izca/kd lfgr] leLr
LVkWQ ls izk;f'pr Lo:i O;fDrxr :i ls {kek ;kpuk dj yh xbZ gSA vkils i= }kjk fuosnu lg vuqjks/k gS fd esjh mDr xyrh dks xaHkhjrk
ls ugha ysrs gq, eq>s ekQ dj nsA eSa vkidks fo'okl fnykrk gwa fd Hkfo"; esa ,slk dskbZ d`R; ugha d:axk ftlls cSad dh Nfo ij foijhr vlj
iM+sA^^ foHkkxh; tkap ckcr izkFkhZ dks uksfVl@Kkiu fn- 28-05-96 dks fn;k x;k Fkk ftldk tokc i= fn- 05-06-96 dks izLrqr dj izkFkhZ us
dFku fd;k gS fd ^^mijksDr lanfHkZr Kkiu ds }kjk izsf"kr vkjksi i= esa ml ij yxk;k x;k vkjksi] eSa v{kj'k% Li"V :i ls Lohdkj djrk gwaA
esjs ls vutkus esa ;g d`R; gks x;k] blds fy, eSa Lo;a xqukgxkj o cSad dk vijk/kh gwaA vkils iwu% fuosnu gS fd esjh 'kkjhfjd fLFkfr dks /;ku
esa j[krs gq, d`I;k lgkuqHkqfr dk :[k viukrs gq, vfxze dk;Zokgh djus dk d"V djsaA esjh vkilh ;gh fourh gS rFkk esjh bl xyrh dks
xgurk ls u ysrs gq, vfxze dk;Zokgh djsaA eSa vkidk vR;ar vkHkkjh jgwaxkA eSa vius }kjk fd, x, d`R; ds fy, csgr vkRexykfu ls ihfM+r gwaA
foHkkxh; tkap dk;Zokgh fn- 06-07-96 esa Hkh izkFkhZ us dFku fd;k gS fd ^^eq>ls xyrh gks xbZ Fkh esjs fo:) v/;kjksfir vkjksi Lohdkj gSA^^ ^^eSa
viuk i{k izLrqr djuk ugha pkgrk gwaA^^ bl foHkkxh; tkap dk;Zokgh ij izkFkhZ oh-ih-xqIrk ds gLrk{kj vafdr gSA izn'kZ ,e 8 O;fDrxr lquokbZ
dk;Zokgh fooj.k fn- 22-02-97 esa izkFkhZ us dFku fd;k gS fd ^^;g xyrh esjs ls dUQ;wtu esa gks xbZ gSA vr% {kek djsaA blds vfrfjDr eq>s dqN
ugha dguk gS] iwoZ esa esjs }kjk cSad dh lsok iw.kZ fu"Bk ls dh xbZ gS rFkk bl rjg dk dksbZ d`R; eSusa ugha fd;k gS vr% iwoZ lsok dks ns[krs gq,
n.M ds ckjs esa lgkuqHkwfriwoZd fopkj djus dh d`ik djsaA^^ ftl ij , ls ch izkFkhZ ds gLrk{kj gSA vkjksi LohdkjksfDr ds i= fn- 20-05-96 ,oa
05-06-96 izkFkhZ us Mkd ls Hksts x, Fks tks ncko eas ugha fy[kok, x, gS ftuls ;g ugha ekuk tk ldrk dh ;g izkFkhZ us vkjksi dks Lohdkj
ncko@Hko esa fd;k gSA izkFkhZ }kjk viuk fookn loZizFke le>kSrk vf/kdkjh ds le{k izLrqr fd;k x;k Fkk ,oa le>kSrk vf/kdkjh }kjk izkFkhZ dks
vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2¼,l½ ds vUrxZr deZdkj ugha ekurs gq, fookn dh jsQjsal vf/klwpuk U;k;kf/kdj.k dks izsf"kr ugha dh Fkh ftlds ckn bl
ckcr izkFkhZ ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; esa viuh ;kfpdk izLrqr dh ,oa ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ;g vkns'k ikfjr djrs gq, jsQjsal fd;k fd
izkFkhZ vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2¼,l½ ds vUrxZr deZdkj gS ;k ugha] ;g U;k;ky; }kjk ns[kk tkuk gSA blfy, izkFkhZ 'kk[kk izca/kd ds in fu;ksftr
1116
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
gksus ls vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2¼,l½ ds vUrxZr deZdkj dh ifjHkk"kk esa ugha vkrk gS vr% izkFkhZ dk ;g izdj.k [kkfjt fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA vizkFkhZ
izfrfuf/k dh vksj ls vius dFkuksa ds leFkZu esa fuEu U;kf;d n`"Vkar izLrqr fd, x, gS&
1.
S.K. Maini Vs. M/s Carona Sahu Co. Ltd. and other- 1994 AIR Supreme Court 1824,
2.
Gujrat Industrial Co-Op. Bank Ltd Vs. D.G. Jobanputra- 2005(105) FLR 1206,
3.
Chairman and M.D.V.S.P. and others Goparuju Sri Prabhakara Hari Babu- 2008 (117) FLR 377,
4.
State Bank of India & Ors. Vs. Ramesh Kumar Kachhawaha- 2019(1)RLW 416(Raj.),
5.
Uttarakhand Transport Corporation Vs. Sukhveer Singh- 2017 AIR supreme Court 5686,
6.
North West Karnataka Road Transport Coron Vs. H.H. Pujar- AIR 2008 Supreme Court 3060,
7&
;gka ;g mYys[k djuk lehphu jgsxk dh izkFkhZ dh vksj ls fnukad 12-02-2024 dks izkFkZuk i= izLrqr dj fuosnu fd;k gS fd cSad
çcU/ku }kjk rqjUr rRijrk o xeHkhjrk ls vkjksi i= fnukad 13-5-1996 o vkjksi i= fnukad 28-5-1996 ds tokc vuq'kklfud vf/kdkjh dks Hkst
fn;s x;s ftudk dk;kZy; ckajk esa u gksdj 80 fdyksehVj nwj dksVk esa Fkk vkSj ;g fnukad 20-5-1996 o 5-6-1996 dks dofjax lkFk Hksts x;sA
pktZ'khV esa vuq'kklfud vf/kdkjh }kjk ftl ?kVuk dk fooj.k fd;k gS og çFke n`"Vîk gh ;g çdV djrk gS fd ;g lkjk rd ?kVukde
muds lkeus gh gqvk gS ysfdu vf/koäk çfri{kh dh cgl ds ckn ;g çdV gqvk gS fd vuq'kklfud vf/kdkjh us dksVk ls dk;Zokgh dk *lapkyu
fd;k gS ftlds fy;s mUgsa çcU/k {ks=h; xzkeh.k cSad }kjk dofjax uksV yxkdj le;≤ ij lwpuk nh tkrh gh gSA Lo;a vf/koäk çfri{kh ds
}kjk cSad dh dk;Z ç.kkyh Li"V fd;s tkus ds ckn ;g LokHkkfod gS fd vkjksi i= esa of.kZr ?kVuk dk LFky gkMkSrh {ks=h; xzkeh.k cSad ckjka gS
rks fuf'pr :i ls cSad eSustj }kjk vkjksi i= esa of.kZr ?kVuk dk lEiw.kZ o.kZu vius Lo;a ds doj uksV ds lkFk v/;{k {ks=h; xzkeh.k cSad dksVk
dks Hkstk x;k gksxk ysfdu vkjksi i= dk vk/kkj ;g ewy nLrkost cSad dh vksj ls U;k;ky; esa ;krks çLrqr gh ugha fd;k x;k gS ftlds nks gh
vk'k; gks ldrs gS fd ;g ?kVuk ?kfVr gh ugha gqbZ gS vkSj ;g vkjksi i= ek= Surmises & Conjectures ij vk/kkfjr vkjksi i= gS
;k vkjksi i= esa ftl :i esa ?kVuk dk o.kZu fd;k x;k gS ;g cSad eSustj }kjk fn;s x;s ?kVuk ds fooj.k ls esy ugha [kkrk gS rFkk çkFkhZ
dkexkj ij ncko cukus ds fy;s ?kVuk dks rksM ejksM dj crk;k x;k gSA blds vfrfjä nks vkjksi i= vFkkZr fnukad 13-5-1996 dks vkjksi i=
o mlds ckn fn;s x;s fnukad 28-5-1996 ds vkjksi i= ftlesa gqcgq ogha vkjksi yxk;s x;s tks fnukad 13-05-1996 ds vkjksi i= esa gSA fn;s tkus
dk dksbZ Hkh Li"V dkj.k utj ugha vkrk fd iwoZ esa tks Loh—fä i= fnukad 20-05-1996 dks çkFkhZ dkexkj dks ncko esa ysdj cSad çcU/kd }kjk
vkjksi Loh—fr i= çkIr fd;k x;k og dksVk fLFkr çcU/ku ds vuqlkj dk;Zokgh gsrq leqfpr ugha Fkk vkSj nwljs vkjksi i= ij ftl çdkj dksVk
fLFkr eq[; çcU/ku pkgrk Fkk vkjksi Loh—fr i= fMDVsV djok;k x;kA ;gk¡ ;g Li"V djuk mfpr gksxk fd ftl çdkj nwljk Loh—fr i=
fy[kok;k x;k gS ;g dksbZ Hkh lkekU; O;fä] ftl :i esa Loh—fr i= ugha fy[krkA çFke Loh—fr ds i'pkr tks Loh—fr i= fnukad 28-05-
1996 esa Hkk"kk ç;qä gS og fo'ks"k ç;kstu ds fy;s fy[kokbZ xbZ Hkk"kk ds vfrfjä ugha ekuh tk ldrh gS vkSj nwljs vkjksi i= fn;s tkus dk
ç;kstu Li"V djrh gS fd ;g Qs;jusl ds fy;s nqckjk ekSdk fn;s tkus ds fy;s ugha cfYd çcU/ku us dfri; vius ç;kstu dh flf) o vkjksiksa
dh Loh—fr dh xEHkhjrk dks çkIr djus ds fy;s fn;k FkkA ;gk¡ ;g fy[kuk Hkh lehphu gksxk fd U;k;ky; ds le{k çcU/k çfrfu/kh Jh
dUgS;kyky esgrk }kjk 'kiFk i= çLrqr fd;k x;k gS og Lo;a gh ?kVukde] ftlds uke ij vkjksi i= fn;k x;k gS] ds le; cSad 'kk[kk ckajk
ds çcU/kd Fks rFkk og Lo;a gh vU; O;fä ds lkFk esy[ksMh 'kk[kk esa t‚p gsrq x;s Fks ysfdu muds 'kiFk i= fnukad 01-03-2012 esa ftl çdkj
vkjksi i= esa pksjh dh jde dh tk¡p gsrq tkus dk dksbZ o.kZu ugh gS vkSj u gh bl ckcr dksbZ dFku fd;k gS fd mUgksus oh ih xqIrk dks Lo;a
dh tk¡p djokus gsrq :dus ds fy;s dgk FkkA blds vfrfjä cSad esa bl çdkj pkSjh dk çdj.k gksuk ckcr dksbZ Hkh rF; 'kiFk i= esa vafdr
ugha fd;kA blds vfrfjä ftjg fnukad 2-8-2018 dks ftjg esa ,slh fdlh ?kVuk dk u rks o.kZu fd;k cfYd Li"V :i esa dgk fd ^^tks cSad esa
gqvk mls eSaus 'kiFk i= esa fy[k fn;k vU; dqN ugha gqvk^^ ;gh ugh Jh esgrk }kjk fnukad 1-3-2012 dks 'kiFk i= fn;s tkus ;k mlds i'pkr
fnukad& 2-8-2018 dks ftjg ds i'pkr Hkh vkt fnukad rd çcU/k i{k }kjk çLrqr 'kiFk i= ;k ftjg ij çfrokn ugha fd;k x;k gS A ;g cSad
çcU/kd ds dFkuksa dh çekf.kdrk fl) djrh gSA u rks ;g çdj.k pkSjh dk gS vkSj u gh czhp vkQ VªLV dk tSlk fd vkjksi i= esa of.kZr fd;k
x;k gSA bl çdj.k esa U;k;ky; ds le{k Lo;a çcU/k i{k }kjk çLrqr nks fookfnr rF; gS rFkk ;g foospu dk fo"k; gS fd D;k çcU/k i{k }kjk
vkjksih dkexkj ij ncko cukdj vkjksiksa ij Loh—fr çkIr djus dk mudk dfri; vk'k; dkexkj dks lsok eqä djuk FkkA bl lEcU/k esa
ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk vius lHkh fuf.kZ;ksa esa csusfQf'k;y :y vkQ dUVªD'ku dh vko/kkj.kk dks Lohdkj fd;k gS fd fdlh Hkh foospu
esa lansg dk ykHk detksj i{k vFkkZr dkexkj dks fn;k tkuk pkfg;s bl lEcU/k esa n`"Vkar ,vkbZvkj 1973 lqçhe dksVZ 1227 mYysf[kr gSA tgk¡
rd vkjksi i= dh lR;rk dk lEcU/k gS ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; dk n`"Vkar ¼2009½ 12 lqçhe dksVZ dslsl 78 ;gk¡ pLik gksrk gSA vkjksi i=
esa yxk;s x;s pktZ Dok'kh tqfMf'k;y uspj ds gS ftUgsa lansg ds ijs fl) fd;k tkuk vko';d gSA ;gk¡ ij ?kVukde gh lansg ls ijs ugh gSA
¼LVs.MsM v‚Q çwQ½ vkSj izkFkZuk dh gS fd vkns'k ikfjr djrs le; çkFkhZ dkexkj }kjk çLrqr mijksä rF;ksa ij leqfpr foospu fd;k tk;s rkfd
çkFkhZ dkexkj dks U;k; çkIr gks ldsA
vizkFkhZ fu;kstd us tokc izkFkZuk i= izLrqr dj dFku fd;k gS fd foLr`r mÙkj LVsVesaV v‚Q Dyse ds tokc esa rFkk lk{; çkFkhZ ,oa
nLrkostkr esa fn;k gqvk gSA ftls çkFkhZ }kjk Lohdkj Hkh fd;k gqvk gSA blds foijhr çkFkhZ vU; dFku o vkpj.k djus ls ,LVksIM gSA çkFkZuk
i= ds pj.k de&3 esa of.kZr rF; ,oa vkjksi loZFkk vlR; ,oa vk/kkjghu gSaA çfri{kh }kjk çkFkhZ ls igys Li"Vhdj.k fy;k x;k gS] fQj vkjksi
i= Hkh fn;k x;k gSA mlds ckn t‚p vf/kdkjh fu;qfä dj] foHkkxh; tk¡p Hkh djokbZ gqbZ gSA bu lHkh esa çkFkhZ us vkjksi&i= esa of.kZr vkjksiksa
dks fcuk fdlh vojks/k ds Lohdkj fd;k gqvk gSA blds i'pkr Hkh t‚p vf/kdkjh dh fjiksVZ dks çkFkhZ dks vuq'kklfud vf/kdkjh }kjk fHktok dj
Li"Vhdj.k pkgkA mlesa Hkh çkFkhZ us vkjksi o xyfr;ksa dks Lohdkj fd;k gqvk gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa QSDV ,MfeVsM uhM uksV ch çqOM ,ohMsUl ,DV
ds çko/kku ds vUrxZr mlds foijhr vU; dFku o vkpj.k djus ls çkFkhZ ,LVksIM gSA fd çkFkZuk i= dk pj.k de&4 ftl :i esa fy[kk gS]
Lohdkj ugh gSA rFkkdfFkr ?kVuk ckjka dh gS] ysfdu çkFkhZ dh fu;qfä 'kk[kk esy[ksM+h esa çcU/kd ds in ij FkhA rnuqlkj ?kVuk dk lEcU/k ckjka
,oa esy[ksM+h nksuksa ls gSA esy[ksMh esa gh çkFkhZ dks Li"Vhdj.k gsrq cSad ç'kklu gsrq i= fnukad fn;k x;k] ftldk tokc çkFkhZ us esy[ksM+h ls gh
fHktok;k Fkk rFkk vkjksi i= dk Kkiu Hkh çkFkhZ dks esy[ksM+h esa fnukad 13-5-1996 dks gh fn;k x;k FkkA mlds ckn nwljk vkjksi i= Kkiu
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1117
fnukad 28-5-1996 dks çkFkhZ dks fn;k x;k FkkA ftldk tokc Hkh çkFkhZ us esy[ksMh ls gh fHktok;k Fkk rFkk tk¡p vf/kdkjh }kjk foHkkxh; tk¡p Hkh
{ks=h; dk;kZy; ckjka esa gh lEiUu dh xbZ FkhA mijksä leLr dk;Zokgh fof/kor :i ls dh xbZ FkhA rnuqlkj bl pj.k esa of.kZr vkjksi loZFkk
vlR; ,oa vk/kkjghu gSaA çkFkhZ us mijksä of.kZr vius tokc esa dgha dksbZ vkifÙk ugha dh gS rFkk vc dksbZ vkifÙk djus ls çkFkhZ ,LVksIM gSA
çkFkhZ us Li"Vhdj.k dk tokc] vkjksi i= dk tokc ,oa t‚p dk;Zokgh lHkh esa LoLFk fpÙk ,oa fLFkj cqf) ls viuk tokc çLrqr fd;k gS rFkk
vkjksi&i= esa of.kZr vkjksiksa dks Lohdkj fd;k gqvk gSA rnuqlkj çkFkhZ bl pj.k esa of.kZr rF; o dFku djus ls ,LVksIM gSA mijksä of.kZr
leLr nLrkostkr U;k;ky; dh i=koyh esa gSa] tks çnf'kZr fd;s gq, gSaA vkjksi esa dgha Hkh fofHkUurk ugha gS vkSj u gh çkFkhZ us fofHkUurk dh
vkifÙk LVsVesV v‚Q Dyse esa mBkbZ gS vkSj u gh lk{; esa mBkbZ gSA oSls Hkh nLrkosth çnf'kZr lk{; ls lEiw.kZ fLFkfr Li"V gSA çkFkhZ blds
foijhr vU; dFku o vkpj.k djus ls ckf/kr gSA çkFkhZ ds fo:) Kkiu] vkjksi i= o t‚p dk;Zokgh rFkk t‚p dk;Zokgh dh fjiksVZ Hkst dj
çkFkhZ dks lquokbZ dk volj fn;k tkdj] leLr dk;Zokgh U;k; ds uSlfxZd fl)kUrksa ds rgr dh xbZ gS] ftls çkFkhZ }kjk Lohdkj fd;k gqvk gS
,oa ,Doht fd;k gqvk gSA rnuqlkj çkFkhZ bl pj.k esa of.kZr vU; dFku o vkpj.k djus ls ,LVksIM gS rFkk bl pj.k esa çkFkhZ dh ekax loZFkk
vuqfpr ,oa xSjdkuwuh gSA çkFkhZ }kjk Li"Vhdj.k] tokc vkjksi i= ,oa t‚p dk;Zokgh esa lHkh rF;ksa dks Lohdkj fd;k gqvk gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa
xokg dUgS;kyky }kjk fn;s x;s 'kiFk i= esa foLr`r fooj.k fn;s tkus dh dksbZ vko';drk ugha Fkh rFkk okafNr rF;ksa ds lEcU/k esa gh 'kiFk i=
fn;k x;k Fkk] ftls çkFkhZ }kjk Lohdkj fd;k gqvk gSA rnuqlkj çkFkhZ blds foijhr vU; dFku o vkpj.k djus ls ckf/kr gSA çkFkhZ us bl pj.k
esa rF;ksa dks rksM+ ejksM+ dj u;k dsl cukus dk vlQy ç;kl fd;k gSA ftldk mls dksbZ vf/kdkj ugha gSA çkFkhZ dkexkj dh ifjHkk"kk esa ugha
vkrk gSA çkFkhZ 'kk[kk çcU/kd gS- bl lEcU/k esa çfri{kh }kjk vkifÙk Hkh mBkbZ gqbZ gS rFkk çkFkhZ }kjk 'kk[kk çcU/kd in ls lEcfU/kr leLr
nLrkostksa dks Lohdkj fd;k gqvk gSA bl pj.k esa of.kZr rFkkdfFkr U;kf;d –"VkUr çLrqr çdj.k ij ykxw ugha gksrs gSa rFkk vuko';d :i ls
U;k;ky; }kjk cgl lqu dj fu.kZ; ikfjr djus esa vojks/k mRiUu djus dh fu;r ls ;g çkFkZuk i= çLrqr fd;k x;k gS vkSj ;g izkFkZuk dh gS
fd çkFkhZ dkexkj dh ifjHkk"kk esa ugha vkrk gSA nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh tkdj çdj.k tc fu.kZ; gsrq fuf'pr rkjh[k dj nh xbZ FkhA mlds
ckn çkFkhZ }kjk fn;k x;k ;g çkFkZuk&i= çFke –"Vîk gh esUVsuscy ugh gS vr% çkFkhZ }kjk çLrqr çkFkZuk&i= lO;; fujLr Qjek;k tkosA
pwafd bl U;k;kf/kdj.k dks izkIr jsQjsal ds vuqlkj ;g fcUnw mRrfjr fd;k tkrk gS fd D;k ^^Jh oh-ih-xqIrk] czkap eSustj] gkMkSrh
xzkeh.k cSad dksVk vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2 ¼,l½ ds vUrxZr deZdkj dh Js.kh esa vkrk gS rFkk vizkFkhZ fu;kstd dh vksj ls Hkh bl fcUnw ij
vR;f/kd cy fn;k x;k gS fd izkFkhZ oh-ih- xqIrk vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2 ¼,l½ ds vUrxZr deZdkj dh Js.kh esa ugha vkrk] vr% loZizFke vfHkys[k
ij miyC/k lkexzh rFkk i{kdkjku ds izfrfuf/kx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr cgl o U;kf;d n`”Vkarksa ds vk/kkj ij blh fcUnw dks fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk
mfpr ik;k tkrk gSA bl fcUnw ds fuLrkj.k ds mijkar ‘ks”k fcUnw rFkk izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr izkFkZuk i= fn- 12-02-2024 ds laca/k esa foospu
fd;k tkuk mfpr ik;k tkrk gSA
8&
bl izdj.k esa U;k;kf/kdj.k dks ;g ns[kuk gS fd D;k izkFkhZ vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 dh /kkjk 2¼,l½ ds vUrxZr ^^deZdkj
¼Workman½^^ dh Js.kh esa vkrk gS vFkok ugha\
bl laca/k esa izkFkhZ dh vksj ls lk{; esa Lo;a dk ‘kiFk i= izLrqr fd;k x;k gS ftuesa mlus LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse esa of.kZr rF;ksa dh
iqujkofRr dh gS vkSj ftjg esa ;g dFku fd;k gS fd bl izdj.k esa izkIr jsQjsal ds laca/k esa mlus Hkkjr ljdkj dks i= fy[kk tks izn'kZ ,e 1
gSA bl ij , ls mlds gLrk{kj gSA izn'kZ ,e 2 ls Hkkjr ljdkj us mldh izkFkZuk dks [kkfjt dj fn;k FkkA ;g lgh gS fd izn'kZ ,e 2 ds
fo:) mlus jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; esa fjV ;kfpdk is'k dh FkhA ;g lgh gS fd izn'kZ ,e 2 ds fo:) fjV ;kfpdk is'k dh Fkh tks ekuuh;
jkt- mPp U;k;ky; }kjk [kkfjt dj nh xbZ gSA ;g lgh gS fd mls izn'kZ MCY;w 12 ds vkns'k ds }kjk vkWfQlj ds in ij inksUur fd;k x;k
FkkA ;g ckr lgh gS fd izn'kZ MCY;w 14 ls mls e.Mksyk 'kk[kk izca/kd ds in ij inksUur fd;k x;k FkkA izn'kZ MCY;w 15 cSad }kjk mls fn;k
x;k FkkA ;g ckr lgh gS fd og esy[ksM+h 'kk[kk esa fn- 11-07-1995 dks inLFkkfir gqvk FkkA ;g lgh gS fd fn- 09-05-96 dks og esy[ksM+h 'kk[kk
ds fy, :i;s ysus ds fy, ckjka 'kk[kk esa x;k Fkk D;ksafd 'kk[kk fMek.M Fkh vkSj fyfid dh iksfLVax ogka ij ugha FkhA fQj og ckjka 'kk[kk ls
:i;s ysdj esy[ksM+h 'kk[kk esa vk x;kA ;g lgh gS fd og tc esy[ksM+h 'kk[kk esa igaqpk rks mlds ihNs&ihNs ckjka 'kk[kk ds izca/kd Jh esgrk
vkSj iz/kku dk;kZy; vf/kdkjh Jh jkor esy[ksM+h 'kk[kk ij vk, Fks ;g lgh gS fd mUgksus vkdj mlds 'kk[kk esa ds'k psd fd;kA ;g lgh gS
fd mUgksus dkamVj ds'k esa 10]000@&:- T;knk ik,A ;g xyr gS fd mlds ikl ,d fyQkQs esa 5000@&] 5000@&:- dh nks xfM~M;ka 50
:i;s ds vyx j[kh gqbZ FkhA esy[ksM+h 'kk[kk esa izn'kZ ,e 4 ds'k dh fjiksVZ rS;kj dh Fkh ftl ij , ls ch mlds gLrk{kj gSA vt[kqn dgk fd
;g gLrk{kj ncko esa ysdj djok, x,A izn'kZ ,e 5 mlus 10]000@&:- Jh esgrk dks ykSVk,] ftldh rgjhj izn'kZ ,e 5 ftl ij , ls ch
mlds gLrk{kj gSA ;g Hkh mlls ncko esa fy[kokbZ xbZA izn'kZ ,e 6 rgjhj Hkh mlus fy[kh Fkh] ftl ij , ls ch mlds gLrk{kj gSA izfri{kh
cSad us bl laca/k esa izn'kZ MCY;w 17 mls Kkiu fn;k FkkA ;g lgh gS fd mlus Kkiu ds laca/k esa viuk Li"Vhdj.k izn'kZ MCY;w 19 fn;k FkkA
;g lgh gS fd mlus izn'kZ MCY;w 19 dks izn'kZ MCY;w 18 dofjax ysVj ds lkFk fHktok;k FkkA izn'kZ MCY;w 19 mldk gLrfyf[kr gS vkSj bl ij
, ls ch mlds gLrk{kj gSA mls cSad }kjk izn'kZ MCY;w 20 ls izn'kZ MCY;w 21 pktZ'khV nh xbZ FkhA tkpZ'khV dk tokc mlus izn'kZ MCY;w 24
fn;k FkkA ;g Hkh mldk gLrfyf[kr gS vkSj mldk gLrk{kfjr gS tks , ls ch gSA ;g mlus esy[ksM+h 'kk[kk ls fHktok;k FkkA tks fd izn'kZ MCY;w
23 ds ek/;e ls fHktok;k FkkA izn'kZ MCY;w 64 mls foHkkxh; tkap ds laca/k esa fn;k x;k FkkA blesa ,l-vkbZ- gqlSu dks tkap vf/kdkjh cuk;k
x;k FkkA tkap vf/kdkjh }kjk fn- 27-06-96 dks tkap dk;Zokgh 27-06-96 dks fu;r djus ds fy, lwpuk nh FkhA izn'kZ MCY;w 25 ij , ls ch
mlds lkbu gSA izn'kZ ,e 7 i= O;fDrxr lquokbZ gsrq vuq'kklfud vf/kdkjh us mls fn;k FkkA fn- 22-02-97 dks mldh O;fDrxr lquokbZ gqbZ
Fkh mlds feuVl izn'kZ ,e 8 gSA bl ij , ls ch mlds gLrk{kj gSA izn'kZ MCY;w 55 mls vafre n.Mkns'k feyk FkkA mlds fo:) mlus izn'kZ
MCY;w 57 vihy dh FkhA mldh vihy [kkfjt gksus dh lwpuk izn'kZ MCY;w 58 ls mls nh FkhA izn'kZ ,e 9 _.k Lohd`fr i= ij , ls ch mlds
gLrk{kj gSa A izn'kZ ,e 10] 11 yxk;r izn'kZ ,e 14 ij mlds gLrk{kj , ls ch gSA mlus mlds 'kiFk i= esas vkSj mij tks c;kuksa esa ncko
}kjk gLrk{kj djokus dh ckr dgh gS fd bl ckcr mlus iqfyl esa dksbZ fjiksVZ ntZ ugha djokbZ gSA ;g ckr lgh gS fd mldh chekjh ds
dkj.k cSad }kjk rkjh[ksa O;fDrxr lquokbZ ds fy, fQDl dh xbZ FkhA mlus ncko nLrk[kr djokus ckcr cSad iz'kklu ,oa vU; dgha dksbZ
f'kdk;r o dk;Zokgha ugha dhA
1118
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls lk{; esa dUgS;kyky esgrk dk ‘kiFk i= izLrqr fd;k x;k gS ftlesa mlus tokc LVsVesaV vkWQ Dye esa of.kZr
rF;ksa dh iqujko`fRr dh gS vkSj ftjg esa dFku fd;k gS fd og ekg vDVwcj 1984 ls cSad esa ukSdjh dj jgk gSA og vyx&vyx le; ckjka esa
cSad esa inLFkkfir jgk gSA og ckjka esa 'kk[kk izca/kd ,oa {kS= izca/kd ds in ij dk;Zjr jgk gSA izkFkhZ oh-ih-xqIrk mlds v/khuLFk ckjka 'kk[kk o
vU; xzkeh.k 'k[kkvksa esas jgk gks mls irk ugha gSA vt[kqn dgk fd og oh-ih- xqIrk dks tkurk gSA mls irk ugha gS fd izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr LVsVesaV
vkWQ Dyse dk tokc cSad ds }kjk fn;k x;k gSA ;g dguk lgh gS fd lEiw.kZ LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse eas D;k fy[kk x;k gS mls irk ugha gSA ;g
dguk lgh gS fd cSad }kjk tokc esa D;k fy[kk x;k gS mls iwjk irk ugha gSA ;g dguk lgh gS fd ckjka cSad ds vkl ikl esy[ksM+h] e.Mksyk
'kk[kk,a mlds v/khuLFk FkhA ;g dguk xyr gS fd mls mDr 'kk[kkvksa dh nSfud dk;Z iz.kkyh ds ckjs esa tkudkjh gksA esy[ksM+h] e.Mksyk
'kk[kkvksa esa ,d O;fDr gh dke djrk gks] yEck le; gksus ls vc mls tkudkjh ugha gSA ;g dguk lgh gS fd og cSad dh ,oa odhy lkgc dh
QkbZy i<+dj ns[k dj ugha vk;k gSA og viuk 'kiFk i= i<+dj vk;k gSA og esy[ksM+h 'kk[kk esa fn- 09-05-96 dks x;k FkkA ml fnukad dks
jkor th vkSj og dsl psdj djus x, FksA dsl dkmaVj esa psd fd;k FkkA dkmaVj Vsfcy esa Fks ftlesa njkts Fkh mldh esa psd fd;k FkkA ;g
dguk lgh gS fd dkmaVj [kqyk Fkk vkSj ysu&nsu py jgk FkkA ;g dguk lgh gS fd nl gtkj :i;s dkmaVj esa njkt esa gh Fks tks ,d vyx
fyQkQs esa FksA ;g dguk lgh gS fd oh-ih- xqIrk esy[ksM+h 'kk[kk esa dk;Z djrs Fks vkSj ml fnu 'kk[kk esa vdsys gh FksA ;g dguk lgh gS fd
njkt esa j[ks nl gtkj :i;s Hkh cSad ds gh FksA ;g dguk lgh gS fd og fyfidh; dk;Z ,oa izca/kdh; dk;Z esa varj le>rk gSA ;g dguk
lgh gS fd izkFkhZ ckcw dk dke Hkh djrk FkkA ;g dguk lgh gS fd cSad us tks tokc fn;k oks fcYdqy lgh gksxkA ;g dguk lgh gS fd mlus
odhy lkgc dks lykg ls 'kiFk i= fy[kk gS tks lgh ?kVuk ij vk/kkfjr gSA ;g dguk lgh gS fd ?kVuk ds fnu tks&tks cSad esa gqvk mls
mlus 'kiFk i= esa fy[k fn;k vU; dqN ugha gqvkA ;g dguk lgh gS fd fn- 09-05-1996 esa og ckjka cSad esa dk;Zjr FkkA ;g dguk lgh gS fd
og cSad ls :i;s dh pksjh ds ckjs esa mUgksus dksbZ ,Q-vkbZ-vkj- Fkkus esa ugha fy[kokbZ gSA ;g dguk xyr gS fd og cSad ds laca/k esa >qBs c;ku
ns jgk gSA
9&
izkFkhZ us LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse esa dFku fd;k gS fd mls vizkFkhZ us fu;qDr i= fnukad 26-10-83 }kjk i;Zos{kd ds in ij fu;ksftr
fd;k ,oa fn- 13-05-87 ds vkns'k }kjk fn- 10-02-86 ls {ks= i;Zos{kd ds in ij LFkkbZ dj fn;k rFkk fn- 02-01-92 ds vkns'k ls 'kk[kk esMksyk esa
izca/kd ds in ij inLFkkfir fd;kA izkFkhZ dks izca/kdh; rFkk lqijokbtjh 'kfDr;ka izkIr ugha Fkh] izkFkhZ dk dk;Z eq[;r% fyfidh; izd`fr dk FkkA
izkFkhZ esy[ksM+h 'kk[kk ds izkFkhZ dks ds'k VªkatsD'ku esa xzkgdksa dks iSlk nsuk o mudk iSlk tek djus] [kkrs [kksyuk] [kksyus ds QkeZ Hkjuk] iSlk
tek djokus o fudyokus ds okmpj cukuk] okmpjksa dk fy[kuk] iksfLVax [kkskrsa esa djuk] jksdM+ ds'k cqd fy[kuk] Ms&cqd fy[kuk] tuZy Ms&cqd
fy[kuk] lkIrkfgd] ikf{kd] ekfld] =S&ekfld] izfrosnu rS;kj djukA le;≤ ij lwpuk rS;kj djuk] ekfld csysal ysuk] xzkgdksa ds [kkrksa
dh jkf'k dk fjdUlhys'ku djuk] uksV fxuuk] xM~Mh cukuk] x<~<h cukdj isdsV cukuk] cSysal feykuk] MªkQ~V cukuk] cSysal rS;kj djuk] Mkd
rS;kj djuk jftLVj esa p<+kuk] jftLVMZ Mkd dk vyx ls bUnzkt djuk] Mkd Hsktuk] ckgj ls vkbZ Mkd izkir djuk mls vkod jftLVj esa
ap<+kuk] Mkd dks fMCcs esa Mkyuk] Mkd ?kj esa tkdj Mkd dh jftLVh djkuk] mPp vf/kdkfj;ksa }kjk fjVuZ ekaxus ij fjVuZ nsukA xzkgdksa dks
vR;f/kd jkf'k dk Hkqxrku djus gsrq vU; cSadksa dh 'kk[kk ls iSlk ysus tkus dk dk;Z] rFkk vR;f/kd iSlk cSad esa xzkgdksa dk tek gksus ij ckjksa
'kk[kk esa tek djus tkuk] ys[kk nLrkost o jsdkWMZ j[kuk] okmpj Qk;y djuk] LVkWd jftLVj esusVsu djuk] vkfn dk;Z eq[;r% izkFkhZ dks
jkstkuk djuk iM+rk FkkA cgl ds nkSjku izkFkhZ izfrfuf/k dk ;g rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZ us vizkFkhZ ls nLrkost ryc djokus dk izkFkZuk i= fn- 15-
06-2001 izLrqr fd;k Fkk ftu nLrkostkr ls ;g fl) gksrk fd izkFkhZ }kjk fyfidh; izd`fr ds dk;Z gh fd, tkrs Fks bl izkFkZuk i= ds tokc esa
vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls ts-ih- feJk us 'kiFk i= izLrqr dj Lohdkj fd;k gS fd izkFkhZ us 'kk[kk izca/kd in ds dk;Z ds vfrfjDr vU; okafNr dk;Z o
izfof"V;ka cSad esa j[ks x, okafNr jftLVj vkfn esa dh gSaA izn'kZ MCY;w 97 esa 'kk[kk izca/kd ds dk;Z of.kZr gSa] ysfdu vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls ts-ih-
feJk us 'kiFk i= eas of.kZrkuqlkj LohdkjksfDr ,oa vkns'k fn- 16-09-2002 ls Li"V gS fd izkFkhZ 'kk[kk izca/kd ds dk;Z ds vykok vU; dk;Z djrk
FkkA blfy, izkFkhZ ds dFku v[kf.Mr jgs gSa ,oa izkFkhZ vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2 ¼,l½ ds vUrxZr ^^odZeSu^^ dh ifjHkk"kk esa vkrk gSA vizkFkhZ dk vius
tokc LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse ,oa rdksaZ esa ;g dFku jgk gS fd izkFkhZ muds ;gka 'kk[kk izca/kd ds in ij dk;Zjr Fkk eSusftfj;y dSisflVh esa dk;Zjr
gksus ls izkFkhZ vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2¼,l½ ds vUrxZr deZdkj dh ifjHkk"kk esa ugha vkrk gSA izn'kZ MCY;w 97 esa 'kk[kk izca/kd ds dk;Z of.kZr gS
ysfdu izkFkhZ dh 'kk[kk esa og ,oa ,d lans'k okgd gh dk;Zjr Fks blfy, vU; dk;Z Hkh izkFkhZ }kjk gh fd, tkrs Fks ,oa _.k Lohd`r djuk ,oa
Hkqxrku iwoZ o Hkqxrku ckn tkap dsoy 'kk[kk izca/kd }kjk gh dh tk ldrh gSA izn'kZ ,e 9 o 13 _.k Lohd`fr ,oa Hkqxrku iwoZ tkap izfrosnu
rFkk izn'kZ ,e 10] 11 o 12 Hkqxrku i'pkr tkap izkFkhZ }kjk gh dh xbZ gS rFkk bu nLrkostkr izn'kZ ,e 9 yxk;r 13 ij , ls ch izkFkhZ ds
gLrk{kj vafdr gS tks mlus viuh ftjg esa Lohdkj fd;k gSA izkFkhZ us viuh ftjg esa ;g Hkh Lohdkj fd;k gS fd izn'kZ MCY;w 12 ds vkns'k }kjk
mls vkWfQlj ds in ij ,oa izn'kZ MCY;w 14 ds }kjk e.Mksyk 'kk[kk esa 'kk[kk izca/kd ds in ij inksUur fd;k x;kA mijksDr foospu o fo’ys”k.k
ds ifjizs{; esa izkFkhZ ds ;g dFku ugha ekus tk ldrs dh izkFkhZ }kjk fyfidh; izd`fr ds dk;Z T;knk fd, tkrs Fks blfy, og vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk
/kkjk 2 ¼,l½ ds vUrxZr deZdkj dh ifjHkk"kk eas vkrk gS D;ksafd mldk in 'kk[kk izca/kd dk gh Fkk mlds }kjk _.k Lohd`fr tSls dk;Z fd,
tkrs Fks tks fd dsoy 'kk[kk izca/kd dk gh dk;Z gksrk gS uk dh fdlh fyfid vFkok vU; deZdkjh dkA izkFkhZ }kjk viuh 'kk[kk ds vU; dk;Z
blfy, fd, x, gS D;ksafd mldh 'kk[kk esa mlds vykok ,d lans'k okgd gh Fkk uk fd dksbZ fyfid ;k vU; deZpkjh] ysfdu izkFkhZ viuh
'kk[kk dk 'kk[kk izca/kd Fkk ,oa izca/kdh; izd`fr ds dk;Z gh mlds }kjk fd, tkrs Fks tks fd vU; dksbZ fyfid ugha dj ldrk gS ,oa bu dFkuksa
dh vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls fn- 20-10-2001 dks ts-ih- feJk dk 'kiFk i= izLrqr us Li"V fd;k x;k gS fd esy[ksM+h 'kk[kk izfri{kh esa rRdkyhu le;
tc izkFkhZ 'kk[kk izca/kd ds in ij fu;qDr Fkk ml le; 'kk[kk esa izkFkhZ ds vfrfjDr ,d lans'k okgd vkSj fu;qDr FkkA izkFkhZ us 'kk[kk esy[ksM+h
ftl vof/k esa jgk ml izkFkhZ us 'kk[kk izca/kd in ds dk;Z ds vfrfjDr vU; okafNr dk;Z o izfof"V;ka cSad esa j[ks x, okafNr jftLVj esa vkfn esa
dh gSA izn'kZ ,e 9 o 13 _.k Lohd`fr ,oa Hkqxrku iwoZ tkap izfrosnu izn'kZ ,e 10] 11 o 12 Hkqxrku i'pkr tkap izkFkhZ }kjk gh dh xbZ gS
rFkk bu nLrkostkr izn'kZ ,e 9 yxk;r 13 ij , ls ch izkFkhZ ds gLrk{kj vafdr gS tks mlus viuh ftjg esa Lohdkj fd;k gSA izn'kZ ,e 9 ,oa
13 _.k Lohd`fr i=ksa ls Li"V gks tkrk gS fd _.k dh Lohd`fr dksbZ izca/kd gh dj ldrk ;k mlls ofj"B dksbZ vf/kdkjh] uk dh dksbZ fyfid
;k 'kk[kk izca/kd ls dfu"B dksbZ deZpkjh ,oa ;gka izkFkhZ ds ;g dFku Hkh ugha ekus tk ldrs dh izn'kZ MCY;w 97 esa of.kZr 'kk[kk izca/kd ds dk;Z
ds vfrfjDr mlds }kjk vU; dk;Z Hkh 'kk[kk esa fd, tkrs Fks D;ksafd mldh 'kk[kk esa dsoy ogh dk;Zjr Fkk mlds vfrfjDr vU; dksbZ
deZpkjh@vf/kdkjh ugha FkkA esjs er esa ,slh ifjfLFkfr;k esa ;fn izkFkhZ }kjk NksVs LFkku o NksVh czkap gksus ds dkj.k czkap eSustj ds dk;Z ds
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1119
vfrfjDr vU; fyfidh;@dsf’k;j laca/kh dk;Z fd, x, gSa rks Hkh D;ksafd mldh eq[; :i ls fu;qfDr cSad eSustj ds in ij Fkh rFkk tSls dh
iwoZ esa foospu fd;k x;k gS mlds }kjk dfFkr czkap eky[ksM+h esa czkap eSustj ds :i esa dk;Z djrs gq, izn’kZ ,e 9 yxk;r 13 tkjh fd, x, gS
rFkk _.k vkfn Lohd`r djus dh Lohd`fr iznku dh xbZ gS tks dk;Z ek= czkap eSustj }kjk gh laikfnr fd, tk ldrs gS u fd fdlh fyfid
}kjk ,slh ifjfLFkfr;k esa ;g ekus tkus ;ksX; ugha gS fd izkFkhZ dh Hkys gh fu;qfDr czkap eSustj ds in ij gks fdUrq og okLro esa ek=
fyfidh;@dsf’k;j dk;Z gh mDr eky[ksM+h czkap esa laikfnr dj jgk gksA mijksDr lk{; ds foospu ,oa fo'ys"k.k ls Li"V gS fd izkFkhZ dk in
'kk[kk izca/kd dk gh Fkk ,oa izkFkhZ] vizkFkhZ ds ;gka eSusftfj;y dSisflVh esa czkap eSustj@‘kk[kk izca/kd ds in ij dk;Zjr FkkA blfy, bl laca/k
esa U;k;kf/kdj.k }kjkvkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e esa deZdkj dh ifjHkk"kk dks ns[kuk mfpr U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2 ¼,l½ ds rgr ^^deZdkj^^ dks ifjHkkf"kr fd;k x;k gS %&
^^deZdkj^^ ls dksbZ ,slk O;fDr ¼ftlds vUrxZr f'k{kq Hkh vkrk gS½ vfHkizsr gS] tks fdlh m/kksx esa HkkM+s ;k buke ds fy, dksbZ 'kkjhfjd]
vdq'ky] dq'ky] rduhdh] lafdz;kRed] fyfidh; ;k i;Zos{kf.kd dk;Z djus ds fy, fu;ksftr gS pkgs fu;kstu ds fuca/ku vfHkO;Dr gksa ;k
foof{kr] vkSj fdlh vkS|ksfxd fookn ds laca/k esa bl vf/kfu;e ds v/khu dh fdlh dk;Zokgh ds iz;kstuksa ds fy, blds vUrxZr dksbZ ,slk
O;fDr vkrk gS tks ml fookn ds laca/k esa ;k mlds ifj.kkeLo:i inP;qr ;k mUeksfpr dj fn;k x;k gS ;k ftldh NaVuh dj nh xbZ gS vFkok
ftldh inP;qfr] mUekspu ;k NaVuh fd, tkus ls og fookn iSnk gqvk gks] fdUrq blds vUrxZr dksbZ ,slk O;fDr ugha vkrk gS tks &
¼i½ ok;qlsuk vf/kfu;e] 1950 ¼1950 dk 45½ ;k lsok vf/kfu;e] 1950¼1950 dk 46½ ;k ukSlsuk vf/kfu;e] 1957 ¼1957 dk 62½ ds
v/khu gks] vFkok
¼ii½ iqfyl lsok esa ;k fdlh dkjkxkj ds vf/kdkfj;ksa ;k vU; deZpkjh ds :i esa fu;ksftr gks] vFkok
¼iii½ eq[;r% izcU/kdh; ;k iz'kklfud gSfl;r esa fu;ksftr gks] vFkok
¼iv½ i;Zos{kf.kd izcU/kdh; ;k iz'kklfud gSfl;r esa fu;ksftr gks] vFkok i;Zos{kf.kd gSfl;r esa fu;ksftr gksrs gq, izfrekl ¼nl
gtkj :i;s½ ls vf/kd etnwjh ysrk gks vFkok ;k rks in ls layXu drZO;ksa dh izd`fr ds ;k vius esa fufgr 'kfDr;ksa ds dkj.k ,sls d`R;ksa dk
iz;ksx djrk gS tks eq[;r% izcU/kdh; izd`fr ds gSaA^^
bl lUnHkZ esa ekuuh; dukZVd mPp U;k;ky; }kjk fofu'p; ^^ukxUukFk ,oa vU; cuke dkWeu dsMj desVh] fcnj ,oa vU;&2000
yscvkbZlh 3714¼dukZVd½^^ esa ;g er O;Dr fd;k x;k gS fd ,slk dksbZ O;fDr tks Managerial, Executive ;k Administrative
izd`fr dk dk;Z djrk gS rks og ^^deZdkj@Jfed^^ dh ifjHkk"kk esa ugha vkrk gSA blh vuq:i ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk fofu'p; ^^,;j
bf.M;k dsfcu dz;w ,lksfl;s'ku ,oa vU; cuke ;wfu;u vkWQ bf.M;k ,oa vU;&2012¼1½ ,llhlh 619^^ esa Hkh ;g er O;Dr fd;k x;k gS fd
tks O;fDr Executive category esa vkrk gS] og vf/kfue; dh /kkjk 2¼,l½ ds rgr ^^deZdkj@Jfed^^ dh ifjHkk"kk esa ugha vkrk gS ,oa
ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us ^^,l-ds- euh cuke eS- dkjksuk lkgq da- fy- o vU;&1994 ,vkbZvkj lqizhe dksVZ 1824 ^^ esa ;g er O;Dr fd;k gS
fd ;fn dksbZ deZpkjh ^^izca/kdh; ,oa eSjstsfj;y dsisflVh^^ ls dk;Zjr gks rks og vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2 ¼,l½ esa deZdkj dh ifjHkk"kk vkrk gSA
ekuuh; xqtjkr mPp U;k;ky; us ^^xqtjkr b.MLVªh dks&vkW cSad fy- cuke Mh-th- tksckuiq=k&2005 ¼105½ ,Q,yvkj 1206^^ ls Hkh ekxZn’kZu
izkIr fd;k x;k gS ftlesa Hkh ekuuh; xqtjkr mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ;fn fl)kar izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd ^^czkap eSustj^^ deZdkj dh ifjf/k esa ugha
vkus ls vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky; dks ,sls ekeyksa dh lquokbZ dk {ks=kf/kdkj izkIr ugha gSA ;gka ;g Hkh mYys[kfu; gS fd vizkFkhZ
dh nkSjkus cgl gkM+kSrh {ks=h; xzkeh.k cSad deZpkjho`an lsok fofu;e&1983 izLrqr fd, x, gS ftlesa izca/kd dh ifjHkk”kk bl izdkj gS fd& ^^¼t½
^^izca/kd^^ ls fdlh dk;kZy; ;k ‘kk[kk dk rRle; Hkkjlk/kd vf/kdkjh vfHkizsr gSA^^ vr% bl n`f”V ls Hkh izkFkhZ cSad ‘kk[kk izca/kd@Hkkjlk/kd
vf/kdkjh gksus ds ukrs vkS-fo-vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2¼,l½ ds vUrxZr ^^deZdkj (Workman)" dh Js.kh esa ugha vk,xkA
10&
vr% mDr lEiw.kZ foospu ls ;gh izdV gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ dk in vizkFkhZ ds ;gka ^^izca/kd@eSustj ¼'kk[kk izca/kad½^^ dk Fkk ,slh fLFkfr
esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ,oa mPp U;k;ky;ksa }kjk fofHkUu U;kf;d n`"Vkrksa esa izfrikfnr fl)karksa ds ifjizs{; esa izkFkhZ vkS-fo-vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk
2¼,l½ ds vUrxZr ^^deZdkj (Workman)" dh Js.kh esa ugha vk,xkA
11&
pwafd izkFkhZ vkS-fo-vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2¼,l½ ds vUrxZr ^^deZdkj (Workman)" dh Js.kh esa ugha vkrk vr% ,slh ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa
‘ks”k jgs fcUnw ^^whether the action of the management Hadoti Gramin Bank through its Chairman in removing Shri V.P.
Gupta from Service w.e.f. 08-04-97 is disproportionate to the proved guilt or not. If not, what relief the workman is
entitled?” ds laca/k esa fdlh izdkj dh foLr`r foospu fd, tkus dh dksbZ vko’;drk ‘ks”k ugha jgk tkrh gS vkSj u gh izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr
izkFkZuk i= fn- 12-02-2024 ds laca/k esa dksbZ foLr`r foospu fd, tkus dh vko’;drk ‘ks”k jgrh gSA pwafd izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr izkFkZuk i= dk laca/k
izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ls gS vkSj pwafd mij dh xbZ foospuk ds vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ dks czkap eSustj@’kk[kk izca/kd gksus ds dkj.k vkS-fo-vf/kfu;e dh
/kkjk 2¼,l½ ds vUrxZr ^^deZdkj (Workman)" ugha ekuk x;k gSA izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`"Vkar izdj.k dh rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa
ls fHkUu gksus ds dkj.k izkFkhZ dks dksbZ lgk;rk iznku ugha djrs gSA vr% izkFkhZ] vizkFkhZ ls fdlh vuqrks"k dks izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh ?kksf"kr gksus
;ksX; ugha gS vkSj jsQzsUl Hkh blh vuq:i mRrfjr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA
ifj.kkeLo:i Hkkjr ljdkj] Je ea=ky;] ubZ fnYyh }kjk izklkafxd vkns'k fnukad 05-09-2000 ds tfj;s lEizsf"kr funsZ'k@jsQzsUl
fookn dks blh vuq:i mRrfjr fd;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ oh-ih- xqIrk }kjk vizkFkhZ v/;{k gkMkSrh {ks=h; xzkeh.k cSad] dksVk ds fu;kstu esa
^^izca/kd@eSustj ¼'kk[kk izca/kd½^^ ds in ij izca/kdh; izd`fr dk dk;Z laikfnr fd, tkus ls og vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2 ¼,l½ ds vUrxZr
^^deZdkj (Workman)" dh Js.kh esa ugha vk,xk] ,slh fLFkfr esa izkFkhZ] vizkFkhZ ls fdlh izdkj dk dksbZ vuqrks"k izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA
bl vf/kfu.kZ; dh ,d izfr izdj.k la- 25@2001 esa Hkh j[kh tkosA
1120
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
lanhi dqekj 'kekZ] U;k;k/kh'k
vf/kfu.kZ; vkt fnukad 30-09-2024 dks [kqys U;k;kf/kdj.k esa lquk;k tkdj gLrk{kfjr fd;k x;k ftls fu;ekuqlkj leqfpr ljdkj
dks izdk'kukFkZ fHktok;k tkosA
नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 407.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (a1947 dk 14 ) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
cSad vkWQ cSaMksnk ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V औद्योजगक fookn esa औद्योजगक
vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; dksVk ds iapkV 38@2003¼lhvkbZ,l&17@2014½¼lh,uvkj&vkjtsdsVh 06000992003) izdkf”kr djrh gSA
[सं. एल-12012/151/2003-आईआर(बी-II)]
सलोनी, उप जनिेिक
New Delhi, the 6th March, 2025
S.O. 407.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 38/2003(CIS-17/2014)(CNR-RJKT06000992003) of the
Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Kota as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the
management of Bank of Baroda and their workmen.
[No. L-12012/151/2003-IR(B-II)]
SALONI, Dy. Director.
U;k;k/kh'k] vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/kdj.k¼dsUnzh;½dksVk]¼jkt-½
ihBklhu vf/kdkjh& lanhi dqekj 'kekZ] vkj-ts-,l- ¼ftyk tt laoxZ½
funsZ'k izdj.k dzekad%vkS-U;k-¼dsUnzh;½&38@2003¼lhvkbZ,l&17@2014½
¼lh,uvkj&vkjtsdsVh060000992003½
fnukad LFkkfir% 31-10-2003
izlax% Hkkjr ljdkj] Je ea=ky;] ubZ fnYyh ds vkns'k dz-
,y&12012@151@2003¼vkbZvkj¼ch&II½½ fn-17-10-2003
funsZ'k@fookn vUrxZr /kkjk 10¼1½¼?k½ ,oa mi/kkjk 2¼d½
vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e]1947
e/;
fnokdj 'kekZ iq= Jh ca'khyky 'kekZ fuoklh xzke lwyh ekaxjk iksLV csxwa] ftyk fpRrkSMx<+ ¼jkt0½
&&izkFkhZ Jfed
,oa
czkap eSustj] cSad vkWQ cM+kSnk] csaxw ftyk fpRrkSM+x<+ ¼jkt0½
&&vizkFkhZ fu;kstd
mifLFkr
izkFkhZ Jfed dh vksj ls izfrfuf/k%&
Jh iq:"kksRre nk/khp
vizkFkhZ fu;kstd dh vksj ls izfrfuf/k%&
Jh lqjs'k ekFkqj
%%vf/kfu.kZ;%%
fn-% 04-09-2024
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1121
Hkkjr ljdkj] Je ea=ky;] ubZ fnYyh ds izklkafxd vkns'k fnukad 17-10-2003 ds tfj;s funsZ'k fookn] vkS|ksfxd fookn
vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼ftls vkxs ^^vf/kfu;e^^ ls lEcksf/kr fd;k tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 10¼1½¼?k½ ds vUrxZr bl U;k;kf/kdj.k dks vf/kfu.kZ;kFkZ lEizsf"kr
fd;k x;k gS%&
"Whether the workman Sh. Diwakar Sharma was in continuous service of the Bank from 1987 to 15-10-
2002? If yes, whether the action of terminating the services of the workman by the Branch Manager, Bank of Baroda,
Begun, Distt. Chittorgarh w.e.f. 15/10/2002 is legal and justified? If not, what relief the claimant is entitled to and
from which date?"
2&
mDr fookn] U;k;kf/kdj.k esa jsQj gksus ij iathc) dj i{kdkjksa dks mifLFkfr ckcr uksfVl tkjh fd, x,A uksfVl dh ikyuk esa
izkFkhZ Jfed }kjk mifLFkr gksdj LVsVesUV vkWQ Dyse U;k;kf/kdj.k ds le{k izLrqr dj laf{kIrr% ;g dFku fd;k x;k gS fd mls vizkFkhZ
fu;kstd us fnukad 01-04-1987 ls prqFkZ Js.kh deZpkjh dk dk;Z djus gsrq nSfud osru ij lsok esa fu;ksftr fd;k FkkA fu;kstd us izkFkhZ ls ikuh
fiykus] QkbZysa QkbZfyax djkjuk] QkbZy ,d est ls nwljh est ij igqapkuk] Dysfjax ds fy, ,d cSad ls nwljs cSad esas ys tkuk] nwljs cSad esa dS'k
dh isVh ys tkuk vkfn dk dk;Z fy;k gSA jktLFkku if=dk fnukad 14 vxLr] 1993 esa fu;kstd us ,d foKfIr bl vk'k; dh tkjh dh Fkh fd
ftu O;fDr;ksa us fu;kstd cSad dh 'kk[kkvksa@dk;kZy;ksa esas pijklh ds :i esa 90 ;k vf/kd fnu vLFkkbZ :i ls dk;Z fd;k gks] mUgsa
vLFkkbZ@LFkkbZ fu;qfDr nh tkosxhA izkFkhZ us Hkh bl foKfIr ds vuqlkj fu;kstd ds ;gka vkosnu i= izLrqr fd;k Fkk ftl ij fu;kstd us dksbZ
/;ku ugha fn;kA fu;kstd ds ;gka ij izkFkhZ dks tuojh 2000 ls ewy osru] eagxkbZ HkRrk rFkk fo'ks"k HkRrk] edku fdjk;k HkRrk vkfn fn;k tkus
yxk FkkA bl izdkj izkFkhZ dks LFkkbZ deZpkfj;ksa ds led{k ntkZ fn;k x;k FkkA izkFkhZ fnukad 06-10-2002 ls chekj gks x;k Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ us
fu;kstd dks vodk'k dk izkFkZuki= fnukad 14-10-2002 rd dk izLrqr fd;k FkkA fnukad 15-10-2002 dks tc izkFkhZ M~;wVh gsrq vk;k rks izkFkhZ dks
crk;k fd mls ukSdjh ls gVk fn;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ us fu;kstd ds ;gka ij fnukad 01-04-1987 ls fnukad 14-10-2002 rd fujUrj dk;Z fd;k gS
rFkk bl vof/k esa 240 fnu ls dkQh vf/kd le; rd dk;Z dj fy;k gSA izkFkhZ dk fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2¼vk-vks-½ ds vUrxZr NaVuh dh
ifjHkk"kk esa vkrk gSA vizkFkhZ us izkFkhZ dks ukSdjh ls fudkyrs le; uksfVl o uksfVl osru ugha nsdj ,oa Jfed ls dfu"B Jfedksa dks fu;kstu esa
j[kdj vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e esa of.kZr izko/kkuksa dh vogsyuk dh gS rFkk izkFkZuk dh fd izkFkhZ dks fiNys laiw.kZ osru lfgr e; leLr ykHkksa
ds lsok esa cgky djk;s tkus dk vuqrks"k iznku fd;k tkosA
3&
vizkFkhZ fu;kstd dh vksj ls mDr Dyse dk tokc izLrqr dj ;g izfrokn fd;k x;k gS fd cSad esa fu;qfDr Hkkjrh; ljdkj }kjk izkIr
oS/kkfud fu;eksa ,oa fn'kk funsZ'kksa ls fu;af=r gS rFkk ,slh fu;qfDr ds fy, fu/kkZfjr ds fy, fu/kkZfjr izfdz;k dk vuqlj.k djuk gksrk gSA dsUnz
ljdkj }kjk fn;s x;s fn'kkfunsZ'kksa ds vuqlkj prqFkZ Js.kh deZpkfj;ksa dh fu;qfDr jkstxkj dk;kZy; ds ek/;e ls dh tkrh gS ,oa fu;qfDr dsoy
Lohd`r inksa ij gh dh tk ldrh gSA dsUnzh; ljdkj ds mijksDr of.kZr fn'kkfunsZ'kksa dh vuqikyuk esa cSad dk oS/kkfud nkf;Ro gSA izkFkhZ dks
izfri{kh cSad dk deZpkjh u gksus ds dkj.k le;≤ ij vko';drkuqlkj lQkbZ deZpkjh dh vuqifLFkfr esa ¼vodk'k ds le; ij½ gh j[kk
x;k FkkA fnukad 01-01-1982 ls 31-12-1990 ls chp cSad dh Hkkjr fLFkr 'kk[kkvksa@dk;kZy;ksa esa pijklh ds :i esa 90 ;k vf/kd fnu vLFkk;h
:i ls dk;Z fd;k gks] ,sls O;fDr;ksa dh Hkfo"; dh fjfDr;ka gsrq ljdkjh izLrko vuqlkj lwph rS;kj djus gsrq cSad cM+kSnk us vxLr] 1991 esa ns'k
ds fofHkUu lekpkj i=ksa esa foKkiu fn;k FkkA Jh fnokdj 'kekZ us mDr foKkiu ds rgr ;ksX; ugha gksus ds dkj.k vkosnu ugha fd;k Fkk] bl
dkj.k ls mudk uke cSad dh ,EisuYM lwph esa ugha gSA ,sls O;fDr ftUgsa fu;ekuqlkj fu;qDr ugha fd;k x;k gS] oju dk;Z dh vko';drk ds
vk/kkj ij j[k x;k gS] bu O;fDr;ksa dh lsok ls eqfDr dks vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds rgr NaVuh ugha ekuk tk ldrkA pwafd vkosnudrkZ
dks vfu;fer :i ls ,oa fu;qfDr dh fu/kkZfjr izfdz;k dk vuqlj.k djrs gq, ugha j[kk x;k] vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku ml ij
ykxw ugha gksrs vkSj izkFkZuk dh fd izkFkhZ dk LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse izkFkZuki= lO;; [kkfjt fd;k tkosA
4&
lk{; esa Lo;a izkFkhZ fnokdj 'kekZ o vizkFkhZ lk{kh 'kf'k dqekj ds 'kiFk&i= izLrqr gq, ftuls ijLij ftjg dh x;hA izkFkhZ dh vksj
ls nLrkosth lk{; Hkh izLrqr dh x;h ftldk ;Fkkle; mYys[k fd;k tkosxkA
5&
mHk;i{k ds izfrfuf/kx.k dh cgl lquh x;h] tks eq[;r% mudh vksj ls izLrqr vius&vius vH;kosnuksa ds vuq:i gh jgh gSA izkFkhZ dh
vksj ls viuh cgl esa eq[; :i ls ;g rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZ vizkFkhZ fu;kstd ds ;gka fnukad 01-04-1987 ls prqFkZ Js.kh deZpkjh nSfud osru ij
fu;ksftr jgk] vxLr 1991 dh foKfIr vuqlkj 90 ;k vf/kd fnu vLFkkbZ :i ls dk;Z djus okys dkfeZdks dks vLFkkbZ@LFkkbZ fu;qfDr fn;k
tkuk izLrkfor gksus ls izkFkhZ us fu;kstd ds ;gka vkosnu i= fn;k] ftls i'pkr izkFkhZ dks fnukad 15-10-2002 ls ukSdjh ls gVk fn;k x;k gS
tcfd izkFkhZ }kjk fu;kstd ds ;gka fnukad 15-10-2002 ls iwoZ 240 fnol rd dk;Z fd;k x;k gSA blds foijhr vizkFkhZ i{k dk ;g rdZ jgk gS
fd izkFkhZ dHkh Hkh muds ;gka fu;ksftr ugha jgk rFkk vxLr 1991 ds foKkiu ds rgr izkFkhZ }kjk ;ksX; ugha gksus ls vkosnu ugha fd;k vkSj
izkFkhZ }kjk o"kZ 1987 ls 15-10-2002 rd yxkrkj vizkFkhZ cSad esa fu;fer :ils crkSj deZdkj dk;Z ugha fd;k x;kA vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls vius
dFkukasa ds leFkZu esa bl U;k;ky; dk iwoZ vf/kfu.kZ; fnukad 24-07-2024 izLrqr fd;k ftldk gLrxr izdj.k ds ifjizs{; esa voyksdu fd;k x;k
rFkk fuEufyf[kr U;kf;d n`"Vkar izLrqr fd;s ftudk llEeku voyksdu fd;k x;k rFkk muls ekxZn'kZu izkIr fd;k x;k%&
1-
2004(103) FLR 187 Municipal Corpn Faridabad Vs. Siri Niwas
2-
2004(103) FLR 192 Rajasthan Ganganagars Mills Ltd. Vs. State of Raj. & Anr.
3-
2003(96) FLR 492 U P Avasevam Vikas Parishad Vs. kanak and Anr.
4-
2006 (110) FLR 1212 Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigam Ltd. Vs. Mohammed Rafi
5-
2006 LAB I.C. 883 Regional Manager S.B.I. Vs. Rakesh Kumar Tewari
1122
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
6-
FLR 1997 (76) 237 Himanshu Kumar Vidyarthi and Ors. Vs. State of Bihar and Anr.
7-
RLR 1996(2) Shashi Kant Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.
8-
2003(98) FLR 385 Regional Manager Bank of Baroda Vs. PO Central Government Industrial Tribunal
and Anr.
9-
2006(110) FLR 767 HUDA Vs. Jagmal Singh
10-
2008(117) FLR 312 Sanjay Kumar Tiwary and Anr. Vs. State of Bihar and Anr.
11-
2002(95) FLR 1137 President Peroorkada Service Co Operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Smt. S. Sheena and Anr.
12-
1999-II-LLJ Calcutta Tramways Co. (1978) Ltd. Vs. Ramesh and Ors.
6&
gLrxr izdj.k esa tks jsQszal izkIr gqvk gS] mlesa lZoizFke bl fcUnq ds laca/k esa foospu fd;k tkuk vko';d gS fd izkFkhZ fnokdj
'kekZ }kjk vizkFkhZ cSad esa o"kZ 1987 ls 15-10-2002 rd crkSj deZdkj lsok esa yxkrkj fu;ksftr jgk gS vFkok ughaA bl laca/k esa izkFkhZ dk dFku
jgk gS fd izkFkhZ dks vizkFkhZ fu;kstd us fnukad 01-04-1987 ls prqFkZ Js.kh deZpkjh in gsrq nSfud osru ij lsok esa fu;ksftr jgk rFkk vizkFkhZ
}kjk vxLr 1991 esa fudkyh x;h foKfIr ds vuqdze esa 90 ;k vf/kd fnu vLFkkbZ :i ls dk;Z fd;k djus okys dkfeZdks dks vLFkkbZ@LFkkbZ
fu;qfDr fn;k tkuk izLrkfor djus ls izkFkhZ us fu;kstd ds ;gka vkosnu i= izLrqr fd;kA izkFkhZ dk ;g Hkh dFku jgk gS fd mldks tuojh
2000 ls ewy osru] eagxkbZ HkRrk rFkk fo'ks"k HkRrk] edku fdjk;k HkRrk vkfn fn;k tkus yxk Fkk blds i'pkr izkFkhZ fnukad 06-10-2002 ls
chekj gks x;k Fkk rFkk fnukad 15-10-2002 dks tc izkFkhZ M~;wVh gsrq vk;k rks izkFkhZ dks crk;k fd mls ukSdjh ls gVk fn;k x;k gSA blds [k.Mu
esa vizkFkhZ dk ;g dFku jgk gS fd fnukad 01-01-1982 ls 31-12-1990 ds chp pijklh ds :i esa 90 fnu ;k vf/kd fnu vLFkk;h :i ls dk;Z
fd;k gks] ,sls O;fDr;ksa dh Hkfo"; dh fjfDr;ksa gsrq ljdkjh izLrko vuqlkj lwph rS;kj fd;s tkus ckcr vxLr 1991 esa foKkiu fn;k x;k]
ftlesa izkFkhZ }kjk foKkiu ds rgr ;ksX; ugha gksus ls vkosnu ugha fd;k x;k] bl dkj.k mudk uke cSad dh ,EisuYM lwph esa ugha jgk vkSj
izkFkhZ }kjk o"kZ 1987 ls 15-10-2002 rd yxkrkj vizkFkhZ cSad esa fu;fer :ils crkSj deZdkj dk;Z ugha fd;k x;kA
7&
mijksDr rdksZ ds izdk'k esa rFkk i=koyh ds voyksdu ls ;g izdV gS fd izkFkhZ }kjk vizkFkhZ cSad esa crkSj deZdkj o"kZ 1987 ls
15-10-2002 rd fu;fer :i ls dk;Zjr jgus ds laca/k esa dksbZ nLrksot izLrqr ugha fd;s x;s gSaA vfirq viuh lk{; esa bl ckr dk Li"V dFku
fd;k gS fd mlds ikl u rks fu;qfDr i= gS u gh cSad ls fudkys tkus ds laca/k esa dksbZ fyf[kr i= vkfnA blds vfrfjDr izkFkhZ dh vksj ls
iznf'kZr nLrkostkr ftuesa izn'kZ MCy;w- 8 MkVk 'khV] izn'kZ MCY;w- 9 nSfud osru Hkksxh deZpkjh dh foLr`r lwpuk dk;kZof/k lfgr] izn'kZ MCY;w-
13 i= ftlesa 01-01-1987 ls 31-12-1990 rd dh vof/k esa 97 fnol dk;Z djus dk fooj.k vafdr gS] izn'kZ MCY;w- 14 cSad i= ftlesa
01-01-1987 ls 31-12-1990 rd dh vof/k esa 97 fnol rd vLFkkbZ :i ls nSfud osru Hkksxh ds :i esa dk;Z djuk vafdr gS] izn'kZ MCY;w- 19
vuqHko izek.k i= tkjhdrkZ cSad vkWQ cM+kSnk] 'kk[kk cSxwa ftlesa 01-01-1987 ls 18-09-1993 rd dqy 277 fnol dk;Z djuk vafdr gS] izn'kZ
MCY;w- 25 ds }kjk vuqHko izek.k i= ds vuqdze esa izkFkhZ ds cSad esa fnukad 18-09-1993 rd dk;Z djus dk vadu gS] izLrqr fd;s x;s gSaA mDr
nLrkostkr leLr o"kZ 1993 ls iwoZ izkFkhZ }kjk vizkFkhZ fu;kstd ds ;gka crkSj deZdkj nSfud osruHkksxh deZpkjh ds :i esa dk;Z djus ds vuqdze
esa gksuk rks izdV gS ijarq o"kZ 1987 ls 15-10-2002 rd fu;fer :ils cSad esa crkSj deZdkj dk;Zjr jgus ds laca/k esa dksbZ lk{; i=koyh ij
gksuk izdV ugha gSA tgka rd 90 fnol ;k vf/kd fnu vLFkkbZ :i ls dk;Z djus ds laca/k esa i{kdkjku dk dFku jgk gS] bl laca/k esa vizkFkhZ
fu;kstd ds ;gka izkFkhZ }kjk bl ckcr fn;k x;k izkFkZuk i=@vkosnu i= Hkh i=koyh ij layXu ugha gSA blds vfrfjDr 90 fnol ;k mlds
vf/kd dk;Z djus ij deZdkj dks LFkkbZ@vLFkkbZ fu;qfDr fn;s tkus ds laca/k esa izkFkhZ izfrfuf/k }kjk tks rdZ fn;k x;k gS] mlds laca/k esa i`Fkd
ls izfdz;k vey esa yk;k tkuk izdV gksrk gS] tks fd vkKkid ugha gSA izkFkhZ fnokdj 'kekZ us viuh ftjg esa dFku fd;k gS fd eSaus ,Dlh-
MCy;w- 1 ds rgr tks cSad esa vkosnu is'k fd;k mldh izfr U;k;ky; esa is'k ugha dh gSA vizkFkhZ }kjk ftjg esa crk;k fd ;g lgh gS fd izkFkhZ
us fnukad 01-04-1987 ls 5-10-2002 rd VsEizsjh :ils dke fd;k x;k gS jsxqyj dke ugha fd;k gSA deZdkj us gekjs ;gka 17 lky rd dke
fd;k gS ysfdu jsxqyj dke ugha fd;k] yho osdsalh esa dke fd;k gS] eghus esa nks&pkj fnu dke djrk FkkA pwafd i=koyh ij izkFkhZ ds o"kZ 1987
ls fnukad 15-10-2002 rd fu;fer :ils vizkFkhZ cSad esa crkSj deZdkj dk;Z djus ds laca/k esa dksbZ ekSf[kd o nLrkosth lk{; izLrqr ugha dh
x;h gS] ,sls esa izkFkhZ ;g rF; izekf.kr djus esa vlQy jgk gS fd izkFkhZ o"kZ 1987 ls fnukad 15-10-2002 rd fu;fer :ils vizkFkhZ cSad esa crkSj
deZdkj dk;Zjr jgk gksA
8&
vc gLrxr izdj.k esa U;k;ky; dks ;g Hkh ns[kuk gS fd D;k izkFkhZ Jfed fnokdj 'kekZ us mlds }kjk of.kZr lsok i`Fkdrk fnukad
15-10-2002 ls Bhd iwoZ ds ,d dys.Mj esa 240 fnu dk;Z fd;k gS vFkok ugha\
bl laca/k esa izkFkhZ dh vksj ls lk{; esa Lo;a dk 'kiFki= izLrqr fd;k x;k gS ftlesa mlus LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse esa of.kZr rF;ksa dh
iqujko`fRr dh gS vkSj ftjg esa dFku fd;k gS fd cSad us mls dHkh fyf[kr esa fu;qfDr i= ugha fn;kA tc gVk;k rc Hkh fy[kdj ugha fn;kA
mlus i=koyh esa ,slk dksbZ dkxt is'k ugha fd;k ftlls irk pyrk gks fd mlus cSad esa fdl fdl fnu dke fd;kA mls cSad us dHkh fyf[kr
esa ugha fn;k fd mls ikuh fiykuk gS] QkbZysa Qkbfyax djkuk gS] Qkby ,d est ls nwljh est ij igqapkuk gS] Dysfjax ,d cSad ls nwljs cSad ys
tkuk gS rFkk nwljs cSad esa ds'k dh isVh ys tkuk gS] mijksDr dke mlus fd;k bl ckcr U;k;ky; dh i=koyh esa dksbZ dkxt is'k ugha fd;kA
mlus izn'kZ MCY;w- 1 ds rgr tks cSad esa vkosnu is'k fd;k mldh izfr U;k;ky; esa is'k ugha dhA ;g ckr lgh gS fd og nSfud osru Hkksxh
deZpkjh FkkA ;g ckr lgh gS fd dksbZ deZpkjh tc NqV~Vh ij tkrk Fkk rc mldh M~;wVh yxk;h tkrh Fkh ysfdu og jsxqyj FkkA mlus 2002 esa
295 fnu dke fd;k] fdl&fdl fnu dke fd;k og ugha crk ldrkA mldk uke fu;sktu dk;kZy; ds tfj;s ugha vk;k FkkA mls tuojh
2000 esa ewy osru eagaxkbZ HkRRk] fo'ks"k HkRrk edku fdjk;k vkfn fn;k tkus yxk FkKA bl ckcr dksbZ i= U;k;ky; dh i=koyh esa is'k ugha
fd;kA fnukad 06-10-2002 dks og chekj gks x;k Fkk] bldk mlus dksbZ Hkh dkxt U;k;ky; dh i=koyh esa is'k ugha fd;k gSA vodk'k ds
izkFkZuk i= dh udy mlus U;k;ky; dh i=koyh esa is'k ugha dhA ;g ckr xyr gS fd mldh fu;qfDr lQkbZ deZpkjh ds rkSj ij gqbZ gksA
lk{; esa vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls 'kf'k dqekj Vksafx;k dk 'kiFk i= izLrqr fd;k x;k gS ftlesa mUgksaus tokc LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse esa of.kZr
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1123
rF;ksa dh iqujko`fRr dh gS ,oa ftjg esa xokg us dFku fd;k gS fd ;g ckr lgh gS fd tc mlus cSad esas ToksbZu fd;k rc izkFkhZ igys ls gh
dke dj jgk Fkk] mls irk ugha gS fd izkFkhZ fnukad 01-04-1987 ls dke dj jgk FkkA ;g ijekusaV deZpkjh ugha FkkA izn'kZ MCY;w- 1 cSad dh
rjQ ls foKfIr fudyh FkhA izn'kZ MCY;w- 1 ds vuqlkj LFkkbZdj.k ds laca/k esa izkFkhZ us izkFkZuk i= fn;k gks rks mldh tkudkjh esa ugha gSA ;g
ckr lgh gS fd muds cSad esa nSfud osru Hkksxh Jfedksa dks fu;qfDr i= o tkWc dkMZ] mifLFkfr dkMZ ugha fn;k tkrk gSA ;g lgh gS fd budks
okmpj ls Hkqxrku fd;k tkrk gS vkSj budh gkftjh vyx jftLVj esa yxrh gSA ;g lgh gS fd nSfud osru Hkksxh Jfedksa ds ikl ,sls dksbZ
nLrkost ugha gksrs gS ftuls ;g irk pys fd os cSad esa dc ls dc rd dk;Zjr jgs FksA mldh tkudkjh esa ugha gS fd izkFkhZ egaxkbZ HkRrk] ewy
osru] fo'ks"k osru o fdjk;k vkfn tuojh 2000 ls fn;k x;k Fkk ;k ughaA ;g mls irk ugha gS fd izkFkhZ ls fyihdh; dke fy;k x;k Fkk ;k
ughaA izn'kZ MCY;w- 2 i= cSad vkWQ cM+kSnk deZpkjh ;wfu;u us cSad dh czkap dks Hkstk Fkk vkSj dkWih cSad czkap dks Hkh Hksth FkhA ;g lgh gS fd
izn'kZ MCY;w- 2 ds dze la[;k 13 ij izkFkhZ dk uke vafdr gSA ;g xyr gS fd fnukad 06-10-2002 dks izkFkhZ chekj gks x;k gks vkSj 14-10-2002
rd dk vodk'k dk izkFkZuk i= nsdj x;k gksA nSfud osru Hkksxh Jfedksa dks vodk'k dk izkFkZuk i= fn;s tkus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; gh ugha gSA
fyf[kr esa buQksjes'ku nh gks rks mls ;kn ugha gSA nSfud osru Hkksxh deZpkjh dks dke ij j[kus ds fy, fu;kstu dk;kZy; ls uke ekaxs tk;s
,slk vko';d ugha gSA ;g lgh gS fd izkFkhZ us fnukad 01-04-1987 ls 15-10-2002 rd VsEizsjh :i ls dke fd;k gS] jsxqyj dke ugha fd;k gSA
fnukad 15-10-2002 dks dke ij ugha fy;k vkSj bldks uksfVl o uksfVl osru ugha fn;kA eq>s fnukad ;kn ugha gS fd fdl&fdl prqFkZ Js.kh
deZpkjh dh yho osdsalh esa bldks dke ij fy;k FkkA tc dksbZ ihvksu vuqifLFkfr jgrk Fkk rc izkFkhZ dks i= fy[kdj dke gsrq ugah cqyk;k
tkrk Fkk] os bldks Qksu djds ;k eSlst djds dke gsrq cqyk ysrs FksA deZdkj us muds ;gka 17 lky rd dke fd;k gS ij jsxqyj dke ugha
fd;k] fyo osdsalh esa dke fd;k gS] eghus esa 2&4 fnu dke djrk FkkA bl vof/k esa ijekusaV ihvksu ,d gh FkkA izkFkhZ ds vykok vU; nSfud
osru Hkksxh Jfed jgs gksaxsA blh izdkj lQkbZ deZpkjh ugha vkrk Fkk rks mldh ,ot esa lQkbZ deZpkjh cqyk ysrs FksA muds ;gka 90 fnu rd
dksbZ deZdkj dk;Z djrk gS rks mldks LFkkbZ djus dk izko/ku gS ysfdu mlds fy;s vyx ls izfdz;k o izko/kku gSA le>kSrk vf/kdkjh ds ;gka
gqbZ dk;Zokgh dk mls irk ugha gSA prqFkZ Js.kh deZpkjh gh lQkbZ dk dke djrk Fkk vkSj ogh vkWfQl ds Hkh lkjs prqFkZ Js.kh deZpkjh okys dke
djrk FkkA ;g xyr gS fd izkFkhZ ls fyfidh; dke fy;k x;k gks vkSj ihvksu vkSj lQkbZ deZpkjh dk dke u fy;k x;k gksA izn'kZ MCY;w- 4
tokc le>kSrk vf/kdkjh ds ;gka is'k fd;k gSA
9&
lk{; ds mijksDr foospu ls ;g izdV gks jgk gS fd çkFkhZ }kjk fn- 01-04-1987 ls 14-10-2002 rd dh vof/k esa yxkrkj dk;Z djuk
crk;k x;k gS ysfdu izkFkhZ dh vksj ls bl laca/k esa dsoy ek= Dyse o 'kiFk&i= dh lk{; esa gh ;g dFku fd;k x;k gS fd mlus vçkFkhZ ds
v/khu fn- 01-04-1987 ls 14-10-2002 dh vof/k esa fujUrj dk;Z djrs gq, 240 fnu ls Hkh vf/kd le; rd dk;Z iw.kZ fd;k gSA izkFkhZ ds dFkuksa
dk [k.Mu djrs gq, vizkFkhZ us crk;k gS fd izkFkhZ }kjk lsok i`Fkdrk fnukad 15-10-2002 ls iwoZ 240 fnol rd vizkFkhZ ds fu;kstu esa dk;Z ugha
fd;k x;k gSA vizkFkhZ dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd muds }kjk fnukad 01-01-1982 ls 31-12-1990 ds chp pijklh ds :i esa 90 fnu ;k vf/kd
fnu vLFkk;h :i ls dk;Z fd;k gks] ,sls O;fDr;ksa dh Hkfo"; dh fjfDr;ksa gsrq ljdkjh izLrko vuqlkj lwph rS;kj fd;s tkus ckcr vxLr 1991
esa foKkiu fn;k x;k] ftlesa izkFkhZ }kjk foKkiu ds rgr ;ksX; ugha gksus ls vkosnu ugha fd;k x;k] bl dkj.k mudk uke cSad dh ,EisuYM
lwph esa ugha jgk vkSj pwafd lsok esa vkjfEHkd izos'k voS/k ,oa O;FkZ gks ,oa Lohd`r in ij u gks rks izkFkhZ dks fuf;er djus dk rF; gh
vkSfpR;ghu gks tkrk gSA
izkFkhZ dh vksj ls vizkFkhZ ds fu;sktu esa dk;Z djus ds laca/k esa tks nLrkost is'k fd;s x;s gS ftlesa izkFkhZ dh lsokvof/k dk vadu gS]
muesa izn'kZ MCy;w- 8 MkVk 'khV tqykbZ 1987 ls uoEcj 1993] izn'kZ MCY;w- 9 nSfud osru Hkksxh deZpkjh dh foLr`r lwpuk dk;kZof/k vizsy 1987
ls fnlEcj 1990 rd] izn'kZ MCY;w- 13 i= ftlesa 01-01-1987 ls 31-12-1990 rd dh vof/k esa 97 fnol dk;Z djus dk fooj.k vafdr gS] izn'kZ
MCY;w- 14 cSad i= ftlesa 01-01-1987 ls 31-12-1990 rd dh vof/k esa 97 fnol rd vLFkkbZ :i ls nSfud osru Hkksxh ds :i esa dk;Z djuk
vafdr gS] izn'kZ MCY;w- 19 vuqHko izek.k i= tkjhdrkZ cSad vkWQ cM+kSnk] 'kk[kk cSxwa ftlesa 01-01-1987 ls 18-09-1993 rd dqy 277 fnol dk;Z
djuk vafdr gS] izn'kZ MCY;w- 25 i= fnukad 11-05-1994 ds }kjk vuqHko izek.k i= ds vuqdze esa izkFkhZ ds cSad esa fnukad 18-09-1993 ds ckn Hkh
dk;Z djus dk vadu gS] izLrqr fd;s x;s gSaA mDr lHkh nLrkostkr o"kZ 1994 ds ;k mlls iwoZ dh vof/k esa izkFkhZ }kjk vizkFkhZ cSad esa dk;Z djus
ds laca/k esa gksuk izdV gS ijarq izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr nLrkostkr esa ,slk dksbZ Hkh nLrkost izLrqr dj iznf'kZr ugha djk;k x;k gS ftlls ;g
izdV gksrk gks fd izkFkhZ dh lsok i`Fkdrk fnukad 15-10-2002 ls iwoZ ds ,d dys.Mj o"kZ esa izkFkhZ vizkFkhZ cSad ds fu;sktu esa 240 fnol rd
dk;Zjr jgk gksA izkFkhZ dh vksj ls viuh ftjg esa Hkh ;g dFku fd;k x;k gS fd ^^mls dHkh fyf[kr esa fu;qfDr i= ugha fn;k x;kA eSaus
i=koyh esa ,slk dksbZ dkxt is'k ugha fd;k ftlls irk pyrk gks fd eSaus cSad esa fdl&fdl fnu dke fd;kA** blds vfrfjDr xokg us viuh
ftjg esa ;g dFku fd;k gS fd ^^mlus 2002 esa 295 fnu dke fd;k fdl fdl fnu dke fd;k eSa ugha crk ldrkA** lkFk gh vius mDr 295
fnol dk;Z djus ds laca/k esa ,slh dksbZ nLrkosth lk{; izLrqr ugha dh gS ftlls ;g izekf.kr gks lds fd lsok i`Fkdrk fnukad 15-10-2002 ls
iwoZ ds ,d dys.Mj o"kZ esa mDr vof/k dk dk;Z fd;k x;k gks uk gh bl laca/k esa izkFkhZ dh vksj ls ekSf[kd vFkok nLrksoth lk{; nh gSA blds
vfrfjDr izkFkhZ@xokg us viuh ftjg esa ;g Hkh Li"V dFku fd;k gS fd ^^eq>s tuojh 2000 esa ewy osru egaxkbZ HkRrk] fo'ks"k HkRrk] edku
fdjk;k vkfn fn;k tkus yxk Fkk bl ckcr dksbZ i= U;k;ky; dh i=koyh esa is'k ugha fd;kA** ,sls esa Li"V gS fd izkFkhZ }kjk viuh lsok
i`FkdRkk fnukad 15-10-2002 ls iwoZ ,d dys.Mj o"kZ esa 240 fnol rd dk;Z djus ds laca/k esa dksbZ nLrkosth lk{; izLrqr ugha dh gSA gkykafd
vizkFkhZ xokg us viuh ftjg esa ;g dFku rks fd;k gS fd ^^izkFkhZ us fnukad 01-04-1987 ls 05-10-2002 rd VsEizsjh ds :i esa dke fd;k gS] jsxqyj
dke ugha fd;k gSA deZdkj us gekjs ;gka 17 lky rd dke fd;k gS ysfdu jsxqyj dke ugha fd;k] yho osdsalh esa dke fd;k gS] eghus esa 2&4
fnu dke djrk FkkA** ijarq mDr lk{; ls ;g rF; Li"V ugha gksrk fd izkFkhZ }kjk vizkFkhZ cSad ds fu;kstu esa lsok i`Fkdrk fnukad 15-10-2002
ls iwoZ ds ,d dys.Mj o"kZ esa 240 fnol rd dk;Z fd;k gksA izkFkhZ dh vksj ls ,slh dksbZ nLrkosth ;k ekSf[kd lk{; i=koyh ij is'k ugha dh
xbZ gS ftlls ;g izekf.kr gksrk gks fd mlus vizkFkhZ ds fu;kstu esa mlds }kjk of.kZr lsok lekfIr fnukad 15-10-2002 ls Bhd ,d iwoZ ds
dys.Mj esa 240 fnu dk;Z fd;k gksA izkFkhZ dks okafNr vuqrks"k izkIr djus ds fy, ;g izekf.kr djuk vko';d gS fd mlds }kjk crkbZ xbZ lsok
lekfIr fnukad 15-10-2002 ls Bhd iwoZ ds 12 dyS.Mj ekg esa mlds }kjk vizkFkhZ ds v/khu fujUrj 240 fnu dk;Z fd;k x;k Fkk] fdUrq bl
lEcU/k esa izkFkhZ dh vksj ls tks lk{; izLrqr dh x;h gS] mlls mlds dFkuksa dh fdlh Hkh izdkj ls iqf"V ugha gksrh gSA izkFkhZ Jfed ij 240 fnu
yxkrkj dke djus ds rF; dks lkfcr djus dk tks Hkkj gS] mlesa izkFkhZ Jfed }kjk dsoy ek= vius 'kiFk&i= esa ;g fy[k nsuk fd mlus 240
1124
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
fnu rd yxkrkj dke fd;k] i;kZIr ugha gksxk] vfirq mls fdlh Bksl ekSf[kd ,oa izys[kh;@nLrkosth lk{; ls bl rF; dks lkfcr djuk gksxk
ftlls fd ;g rF; lEiq"V gks lds] ijUrq gLrxr izdj.k esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; ls izkFkhZ ;g rF; lkfcr djus esa iw.kZr;k vlQy jgk
gS fd mlds }kjk crkbZ xbZ lsok lekfIr dh fnukad ls Bhd iwoZ ds 12 dyS.Mj ekg dh vof/k esa mlus vizkFkhZ ds fu;kstu esa fujUrj 240 ;k
mlls vf/kd dk;Z fd;k gSA ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk fuEufyf[kr U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa esa bl laca/k esa le;≤ ij ;gh fl)kar izfrikfnr
fd;k gS&
Ranip Nagar Palika Vs. Babuji Gabhaji Thakore-IX(2007) SLT 805 SC esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk ;g fl)kar
izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd LABOUR LAW- 240 days completion of service- Burden of proof lies on workman to show he
worked continuously for 240 days for preceding one year - It is for workman to adduce evidence apart from
examining himself to prove factum of being in employment of employer.
State of Gujrat vs Pratamsingh Narsinh Parmar, (2001) 9 SCC 713. esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk ;g
fl)kar izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd In our opinion the Tribunal was not right in placing the onus of the management without
first determining on the basis of cogent evidence that the respondent had worked for more than 240 days in the year
preceding his termination. It was the case of the claimant that he had so worked but this claim was denied by the
appeallant. It was then for the claimant to lead evidence to show that he had in fact worked for 240 days in the year
preceding his termination. Filling of an affidavit is only his own statement in his favour and that cannot be regarded as
sufficient evidence for any Court or Tribunal to come to the conclusion that a workman had, in fact, worked for 240
days in a year. No Proof of receipt of salary or wages for 240 days or order or record of appointment or engagement
for this period was produced by the workman. on this ground alone, the award is liable to be set aside.
Rajasthan State Ganganagar Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr. v(2004) LST
686=2004(8)SCC161, ¼iSjk 6½ esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk ;g fl)kar izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd "It was the case of the workman that he
had worked for more than 240 days in the year concerned. This claim was denied by the appellant. It was for the
claimant to lead evidence to show that he had in fact worked up to 240 days in the year preceding his termination. He
has filed an affidavit. It is only his own statement which is in his favour and that cannot be regarded as sufficient
evidence for any Court or Tribunal to come to the conclusion that in fact the claimant had worked for 240 days in a
year. These aspects were highlighted in Range Forest Officer vs S.T. Hadimani, 2002 (3) SCC 25. No Proof of
receipt of salary or wages for 240 days or order or record in that regard was produceci. Mere Non-production of the
muster roll for a particular period was not sufficient for the Labour Court to hold that the workman had worked for
240 days as claimed."
Manager Reserve Bank of India Bangalore Vs S. Mani and Others 2005 (5) SCC page 100 esa ekuuh; loksZPp
U;k;ky; }kjk ;g fl)kar izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd The Initial burden of proof was on the workman to show that he had compledted
240 days of service. Tribunal's view that the burden was on the employer was held to be erroneous.
R.M. Yellatti Vs The Asst. Executive Engineer (2006 (1) SCC 1006) 2005 AIR SCW 6103 esa ekuuh; loksZPp
U;k;ky; }kjk ;g fl)kar izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd "Analysing the above decisions of this court, it is clear that the provisions of the
Evidence Act. in terms do not apply to the proceedings under section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act. However,
applying general principles and on reading the aforestated judgements we find that this court has repeatedly taken the
view that the burden of proof is on the claimant to show that he had worked for 240 days in a given year. This burden
is discharged only upon the workman stepping in thewitness box. This burden is discharged upon the workman
adducing cogent evidence, both oral and documentary. In cases of termination of services of daily waged earner, there
will be no letter of appointment or termination. There will also be no receipt or proof of payment. Thus in most cases,
the workman (claimant) can only call upon the employer to produce before the court the nominal muster roll for the
given period, the letter of appointment or termination, if any, the wage register, the attendance register etc. Drawing of
adverse inference ultimately would depend thereafter on facts of each case. The above decisions however make it
clear that mere affidavits or self-serving statements made by the claimant/workman will not suffice in the matter of
discharge of the burden placed by law on the workman to prove that he had worked for 240 days in a given year. The
above judgements further lay down that mere non-production of muster rolls per se without any plea of suppression
by the claimant workman will not be the ground for the tribunal to draw an adverse inference against the
management. Lastly, the above judgements lay down the basic principle, namely, that the High Court under Article
226 of the Constitution will not interfere with the concurrent findings of fact recorded by the labour court unless they
are perverse. This exercise will depend upon facts of each case."
10&
bl izdkj mijksDr foospu o fo'ys"k.k ds vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ viuh lk{; ls ;g fl) dj ikus esa vlQy jgk gS fd mlus vizkFkhZ ds
;gka mlds }kjk of.kZr lsok lekfIr fnukad 15-10-2002 ls Bhd iwoZ ds ,d dyS.Mj o"kZ] vFkkZr 12 dyS.Mj ekg esa fujUrj 240 fnu dk;Z fd;k
gksA ,slh fLFkfr esa izkFkhZ Jfed] vizkFkhZ fu;kstd ls fdlh izdkj dk dksbZ vuqrks"k izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh gksuk ugha ik;k tkrk gS ,oa lEizsf"kr
funsZ'k@jsQzsUl blh vuq:i mRrfjr gksus ;ksX; gSA
ifj.kkeLo:i Hkkjr ljdkj] Je ea=ky;] ubZ fnYyh }kjk izklkafxd vkns'k fnukad 17-10-2003 ds tfj;s lEizsf"kr funsZ'k@jsQzsUl
fookn dks blh vuq:i mRrfjr fd;k tkrk gS fdJfed fnokdj 'kekZ viuh lk{; ls ;g fl) dj ikus esa vlQy jgk gS fd izkFkhZ fnokdj
'kekZ o"kZ 1987 ls fnukad 15-10-2002 rd vizkFkhZ cSad ds fu;kstu esa crkSj deZdkj ds :i esa yxkrkj fu;ksftr jgk gks rFkk izkFkhZ vizkFkhZ czkap
eSustj] cSad vkWQ cM+kSnk] cSxwa] ftyk fpRrkSM+x<+ ds ;gka mlds }kjk of.kZr lsok lekfIr fnukad 15-10-2002 ls Bhd iwoZ ds ,d dyS.Mj o"kZ]
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1125
vFkkZr 12 dyS.Mj ekg esa fujUrj 240 fnu dk;Z fd;k gks] ,slh fLFkfr esa izkFkhZ Jfed] vizkFkhZ fu;kstd ls fdlh izdkj dk dksbZ vuqrks"k izkIr
djus ds vf/kdkjh ugha gSA
lanhi dqekj 'kekZ] U;k;k/kh'k
vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/kdj.k ¼dsUnzh;½] dksVk ¼jkt-½
vf/kfu.kZ; vkt fnukad 04-09-2024 dks [kqys U;k;kf/kdj.k esa lquk;k tkdj gLrk{kfjr fd;k x;k ftls fu;ekuqlkj leqfpr ljdkj
dks izdk'kukFkZ fHktok;k tkosA
नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 408.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (a1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;
ljdkj मेससच पटेल इंिीजनयररंग वक्त्सच
)
जविाग
(
ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa
fufnZ’V औद्योजगक fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;
ds iapkV (a3/2017) izdkf'kr
djrh gSA
[सं. एल-14011/99/2016-आईआर(बी-II)]
सलोनी, उप जनिेिक
New Delhi, the 6th March, 2025
S.O. 408.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 3/2017) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Patel
Engineering Works (Vizag) and their workmen.
[No. L-14011/99/2016-IR(B-I)]
SALONI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present: - Sri IRFAN QAMAR
Presiding Officer
Dated the 15th day of October, 2024
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 3/2017
Between:
K Satya Raju,
D.No. 60-30-54,
Janatha Colony,
Malkapuram,
Vishakapatnam-530011.
..….Petitioner
AND
1. M/s Patel Engineering Works (Vizag),
1st Floor, Flat No-5, City Plaza,
Dabagardens, Vishakapatnam-530020.
1126
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2. M/s Patel Engineering Works (Vizag),
207, Old Bake House, Nagindas Master Road,
Extension Fort, Mumbai-400001.
…Respondents
Appearances:
For the Petitioner : Party in person
For the Respondent: D.N. Murthy, Advocate R1 & R2
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No.14011/99/2016 (IR(DU)) dated 16.12.2016
referred the following dispute under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between
the management of M/s Patel Engineering Works and their workmen. The reference is,
THE SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of M/s Patel Engineering Works (Vizag) a Contractor engaged in
naval dockyard, Visakhapatnam, in terminating the services of Shri K. Satya Raju Ex-Gas Cutter, Workman,
w.e.f. 28.10.2015 without complying Section 25(F) of I.D. Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, to what
relief the concerned workman is entitled to?’
The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No 3/2017 and notices were issued to the parties concerned.
2.
After filing claim statement Petitioner remained absent. Despite sufficient opportunity accorded to him, the
Petitioner did not adduce any evidence to substantiate his claim. Perused the record. Since the Petitioner has not
substantiated his claim by any evidence, therefore, a ‘No-claim’ award is passed.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Shri Vinay Panghal, LDC corrected and signed by me on this the 15th day of
October, 2024.
IRFAN QAMAR, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the
Witnesses examined for the
Petitioner
Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 409.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (a1947 dk 14 ) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa
dsUnzh; ljdkj मेससच विंिुस्ट्तान जिपयाडच जलजमटेड ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp
vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V औद्योजगक fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;
ds iapkV
(a14/2017) izdkf'kr djrh gSA
[सं. एल-14011/29/2016-आईआर(बी-I)]
सलोनी, उप जनिेिक
New Delhi, the 6th March, 2025
S.O. 409.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 14/2017) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Hindustan
Shipyard Ltd. and their workmen.
[No. L-14011/29/2016-IR(B-I)]
SALONI, Dy. Director
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1127
ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present: - Sri IRFAN QAMAR
Presiding Officer
Dated the 15th day of October, 2024
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 14/2017
Between:
The General Secretary,
Shipyard Contract Labour Union,
CITU Office, Door No. 61-4-19/A,
Venkannapalem, Malkapuram,
Vishakapatnam-530011.
..….Petitioner
AND
1. The General Manager,
M/s Hindustan Shipyard Ltd.
Gandhigram (Presiding Officer),
Vishakapatnam-530005.
2. M/s Savitri Industries,
HSL Commercial Complex,
Scindia New Colony,
Gandhinagar, Vishakapatnam-530005.
…Respondents
Appearances:
For the Petitioner : None
For the Respondent: CH Ravi, Advocate of R1
Saibaba & Srinivas, Advocate R2
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No.14011/29/2016 (IR(DU)) dated 06.04.2017
referred the following dispute under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between
the management of M/s M/s Hindustan Shipyard Ltd., and their workmen. The reference is,
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of M/s Savithri Industries contractor of Hindustan Shipyard Ltd,
Visakhapatnam in terminating the services of Sri T. Rama Rao, Sri P. Venkata Appa Rao, Sri B. Trinadha
Rao, Sri M. Suryanarayan, Sri Babu Rao, Sri S. Seshu Kumar and Sri S. Jogi Naidu without complying
Section 25(F) of I.D. Act, 1947 is legal and/ or justified? If not, what relief the workmen are entitled to?’
The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No 14/2017 and notices were issued to the parties concerned.
2.
Petitioner absent on the date fixed for filing of claim statement and documents. Despite providing sufficient
opportunity, petitioner did not filed any claim statement. Therefore, in absence of Petitioner and non-filing of claim
statement by the Petitioner, the case is ‘No Claim’ award is passed.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Shri Vinay Panghal, LDC corrected and signed by me on this the 15th day of
October, 2024.
IRFAN QAMAR, Presiding Officer
1128
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the
Witnesses examined for the
Petitioner
Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 410.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (a1947 dk 14 ) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa
dsUnzh; ljdkj
ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdkas vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa
fufnZ’V औद्योजगक fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;
ds iapkV
(a61/2017) izdkf'kr djrh gSA
[सं. एल-12012/35/2017-आईआर(बी-II )]
सलोनी, उप जनिेिक
New Delhi, the 6th March, 2025
S.O. 410.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 61/2017) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
Kanpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Punjab National
Bank and their workmen.
[No L-12012/35/2017-IR(B-II)]
SALONI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL –CUM- LABOUR COURT, KANPUR
PRESENT
JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
PRESIDING OFFICER
I.D. No. 61/2017
Ref. No.L-12012/35/2017-IR (B-II) dated 27.07.2017
BETWEEN
ShriSurendra Kumar Maurya S/o ShriKeshavPrasadaMaurya,
Vill. Gerai, PO; Gopiganj, Distt.Ravidas Nagar,
Bhadohi - 231303
AND
1. The Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, Gopiganj Branch, PO: Gopiganj ,Distt. Ravidas Nagar, UP - 221401
2. The Circle Head, Punjab National Bank, Divisional Office, The Mall Road, Cantt. Varanasi (U.P.) - 221001
AWARD
By order No. L-12012/35/2017(IR(B-II) dated 27.07.2017 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-
section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) by the Central
Government, referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1129
“Whether the action of the Punjab National Bank in alleged terminating services of ShriSurendra Kumar Maurya on
4.6.2013 is legal & justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled for?”
In pursuance to the said reference I.D. Case No. 61 of 2017 was registered before this Tribunal.
In the statement of claim, the workman pleaded as under:
He was appointed as Business Facilitator on casual basis in the branch of Punjab National Bank Gopiganj on
07.11.2009 and in the said capacity he worked and discharged his duties till 06.11.2011. Thereafter the services were
retrenched of the terminated without compliance with provisions of section 25-F of the Act.
In view of the said facts on behalf of workman it has been prayed that the order of termination of retrenchment may
be set aside and he may be reinstated in services.
On behalf of respondent in the written statement it was pleaded as under:-
ShriSurendra Kumar Maurya submitted his application on prescribed application format along with the relative
documents to our B/O Gopiganj for engagement as Business Facilitator (Individual). BM, B/O Gopiganj forwarded
his application to Circle Office, Varanasi. On the recommendation of the Base branch BO: Gopiganj, ShriSurendra
Kumar Maurya was approved for engagement as Business Facilitator (Individual) at Base branch, Gopiganj. In terms
of the MOU executed by the claimant himself wherein it was clearly specified that the engagement of BF/BC would
be initially for a period of one year from 07.11.2009 and renewable for a further specified period on satisfactory
performance and as mutually agreed by the above parties. Thus, it is amply clear that the nature of engagement of the
claimant was purely contractual in nature.
As the claimant was found suitable in the interview held for the purpose, he was approved, vide Bank's letter dated
07.11.2009, as the Business Facilitator at the respondent Bank's Gopiganj Branch, District SantRavidas Nagar subject
to terms and conditions in MOU executed by the claimant himself wherein it was clearly specified that the
engagement of BF/BC would be initially for a period of one year from 07.11.2009 and renewable for a further
specified period on satisfactory performance and as mutually agreed by the above parties. He was paid remuneration
on mutually agreed rates for discharging his duties as business facilitator
On the above said strength the Learned Counsel for the respondent Sri Neeraj Sharma submits that the case filed by
the applicant lacks on merits and is liable to be dismissed.
Thereafter, the document as well as evidence on affidavit in support of their cases were filed on affidavit and they
were cross-examined.
Further, Sri Surendra Kumar Maurya filed a WRIT-C No. 36423 of 2023 before the Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad
operative portion of the same is read as under:
“It has been stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has filed an Industrial Dispute
No. 61 of 2017 (Surendra Kumar Maurya Vs. Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, Branch Gopiganj, District
Bhadohi and another) before the court of Industrial Tribunal Cum Labour Court, Kanpur on 08.12.2017 for quashing
the verbal order dated 04.06.2013, which
is still pending, therefore, the same may be decided within the stipulated
time.
No useful purpose would be served by keeping this petition pending in view of the order, which the Court
proposes to pass hereunder.
Without entering into the controversy involved in the writ petition, the writ petition is disposed of with a
direction to Industrial Tribunal Cum-Labour- Court, Kanpur to decide the aforesaid Industrial Dispute in accordance
with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.”
Finding & Conclusion:
I have heard Sri Neeraj Sharma Learned Counsel for the respondent and gone through the records.
From the pleadings as raised by the parties, the position which emerge out that Sri Surendra Kumar Maurya-applicant
was initially engaged as on Class-IV as a causal labouron 07.11.2009 and in the said capacity his services were
retrenched on 04.06.2013 without following the mandatory provisions as provided under Section 25-F of Industrial
Disputes Act 1947.
So far as the defence, is taken by the management/respondent that Sri Surendra Kumar Maurya was engaged as
Business Facilitator at Base Branch BO; Gopiganjand MOU was executed between the claimant and the bank for
which he was engaged for a one year w.e.f. 07.11.2009. However, after expiry of the said period the respondent
allowed the workman to continue and discharged his duties as casual labour on the post of Business Facilitator till
04.06.2013.
As such the defence, is taken by the respondent in support of their case that his engagement on the post of Business
Facilitator as per MOU has came to end after one year from 07.11.2009 has got no force and rejected.
1130
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Next point, to be considered in the present case “whether applicantworked for more than 240 days continuously as
Business Facilitator (causal labour) in the last 12 preceding months from the date of retrenchmentand his services
were terminated/retrenched or not?”
As per section 101 of Indian Evidence Act which is read as under:-
“101. Burden of proof.- Whoever desires any Court to give judgment as to any legal right or liability
dependent on the existence of facts which he asserts, must prove that those facts exist.
When a person is bound to prove the existence of any fact, it is said that the burden of proof lies on that
person.”
Thus, the burden lies on the workman to prove that he has worked for 240 days in the last 12 preceding months from
the date of retrenchment of his services.
In the instant matter, in his statement of claim, the workman has categorically pleaded that he had worked for 240
days in the last 12 preceding months from the date of retrenchment of his services and his services were retrenched on
4.6.2013 from the post of Business Facilitator without following the provision as provided under section 25-F of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
The said facts was not categorically denied by the respondent in their written statement rather respondent had stated
that the workman was engaged on the post of Business Facilitator from contractor as such respondentis not the
appointing authority so taking into consideration the said facts and the Contract Labour Abolition Act the Punjab
National Bank as stated above the Punjab National Bank was principal employer of workman even if he has been
engaged through contractor.
Further, the respondent their cogent affidavit had not stated that whether as per the provisions of Contract Labour
Abolition, Act necessary certificate has been issued by authority concerned in respect the engagement of contractual
worker of the contractor.
Thus, keeping in view of the said facts, as per the settled position of law, even if the workman was engaged through
contractor in the establishment of Punjab National Bank in that circumstances, Punjab National Bank will be the
principal employer of the workman and in the present case, the said facts categorically proved because the
salary/wages will be paid to workman through the Punjab National Bank/ Principal Employer.
Moreover, as in written statement filed on behalf of the respondent, they had not denied the fact that the workman had
continuously worked for 240 days prior to retrenchment of his services in last preceding 12 calendar months so the
said facts, amounts to admission by the respondent, as per the pleadings on record.
Further, from the perusal of record, it is also transpired that the workman has filed the attendance sheets in support of
his case on the point in issue, as per the attendance sheets which are the documentary evidence filed on behalf of the
workman and not denied by the respondent filing any material/ document in support of its case, as well as evidence
file on affidavit by the workman as his cross-examination, the position which emerge out that he has continueously
worked for 240 days preceding 12 months prior to retrenchment of his services and the provision of section 25-F of
the ID Act has not been followed and as no retrenchment compensation was given to him and after retrenchment of
his services another person has been engaged on his place the said material piece of evidence not denied by the
respondent by way evidence on affidavit (examination in chief of its witness) and by the said witness in his cross-
examination.
Thus, taken into consideration the above said facts as well as the law laid down by the Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High
Court in the case of Chairman, Institution of Engineers, Jabalpur Vs. KailashSen operative portion of the same is
read as under:
“14. 14. It is not in dispute that the respondent employee was in employment of petitioner institute and was
working as Watchman/Peon on daily wages. The employee has claimed that, he was working continuously
since 2008 whereas the petitioner institute denied this fact that he worked for more than 240 days in a
calendar year. Similarly, the petitioner institute claimed that the petitioner institute is non-profitable institute
whereas the employee stated that the petitioner institute is indulged in charging the amount from the
participants. The petitioner institute was having sufficient documentary evidence to demonstrate that
petitioner is not a profit making institute as well as the proof that the employee has not worked for more than
240 days in a calendar year. An application was moved on behalf of employee before the Labour court by
which he prayed for issuance of direction to the institute to produce the documents in respect of attendance
register and payment register. However, the same were not produced by the institute despite directions
issued by the Labour Court, therefore, it shall be presumed that the documents were not in favour of institute
and adverse influence ought to have been drawn against the institute.
15. The Apex Court in the matter of Gopal Krishnaj Ketkar v. Mohamed Haji Latif and others, has held that,
if a party in possession of best evidence, which would throw a light on the issue in controversy withheld the
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1131
same, Court ought to draw an adverse inference against the party notwithstanding that onus of proof does
not lie on him. The party who is in possession of best evidence cannot rely on abstract doctrine of onus of
proof or on the fact that he was not called upon to produce it.”
And the law as laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the matter of GopalKrishnajKetkar vs. Mohamed Haji Latif
and others, AIR 1968 SC 1413 has held that, if a party in possession of best evidence, which would throw a light on
the issue in controversy withheld the same, Court ought to draw an adverse inference against the party
notwithstanding that onus of proof does not lie on him. The party who is in possession of best evidence cannot rely on
abstract doctrine of onus of proof or on the fact that he was not called upon to produce it.
The Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Chairman, Institute of Engineers, Jabalpur Versus
KailashSen reported in 2024(181) FLR 300, it has been held that it is not in dispute that workman was in
employment with respondent since the date of engagement and prior to retrenchment of his services he has
continuously worked for 240 days in the last preceding 12 months. The said plea taken by the workman has to be
categorically denied and disprove by the respondent who has sufficient documentary evidence to demonstrate that
employee has not worked for more than 240 days in a calander year by producing attendance and payment register. If
same is not done, it will be presumed that the respondent has failed to dislodge the claim of the workman that he has
worked for more than 240 days in last preceding 12 months.
A Division Bench of Hon’bleTelangana High Court in the case of S.Srinivas Versus The Union of India & others
reported in 2024 LLR 860, it has been held that it is trite law that a party invoking/relying on certain plea has to make
an avberment with details to sustain such a plea and has to adduce material to establish allegations made and the
burden is on the party to lead and prove that it is right. (see State of Uttar Pradesh v. Kartar Singh, AIR 1964 SC
1135).(see also Pradeep v. Manganese Ore (India) Limited &ors. 2022 (3) SCC 683).
Accordingly in view of the said facts the argument, advanced by the Learned Counsel for the respondentSri Neeraj
Sharma that workman is not an employee of the management/respondentand has not worked 240 days got no force
because, the workman ShriSurendra Kumar Maurya has clearly established and proved that he had worked for more
than 240 days in the last preceding 12 months prior to date of his oral termination on 04.06.2013; hence, the same is
rejected.
Thus in view of above once action on the part of respondent thereby retrenching the services of the workman without
following the provisions of Section 25-F of the Act 1952 is contrary to law, then what relief the workman is entitled
in pursuance to the reference No.L-12012/35/2017 - IR(B-II) Dated 27.07.2017.
Answer to the said question finds place in the case of Assistant Engineer, Rajasthan State Agriculture Marketing
Board, Sub-Division, Kota vs. Mohan Lal reported in (2013) 14 SCC 543, wherein it has been held that the
respondent was engaged as a Mistri on muster roll basis, whose services were terminated. The workman was neither
given one month's notice nor one month's salary was given in lieu of that notice, prior to termination of his service
and he was also not paid retrenchment compensation. The industrial dispute, which was referred to the Labour Court
culminated with the award made by the Labour Court, holding that as the workman had completed more than 240
days in a calendar year and his services were being terminated in violation of Section 25- F of the Industrial Dispute
Act, 1947, the workman was entitled to be reinstated with continuity in service.
The Single Judge of the Hon’ble High Court set aside the award and the Division Bench reinstated the award passed
by the Labour Court. The Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that the workman had worked for 286 days from
01.11.1984 to 17.02.1986 and though the service of the workman was terminated w.e.f. 18.02.1986, the industrial
dispute was raised by the workman after six years. The Supreme Court thus held that the judicial discretion exercised
by the Labour Court was flawed and unsustainable, in view of the delay of six years in raising the industrial dispute.
However, the Supreme Court held that the interest of justice would be sub-served, if in lieu of reinstatement,
compensation @ Rs.1 Lakh was paid to the workman.
In the case of U.P. State Road Transport Corporation vs. Man Singh reported in 2006 (111) FLR 323(SC), the
service of the respondent, who was appointed on temporary basis, was terminated. The industrial dispute referred to
the Labour Court culminated with the termination of the workman being set aside, in view of Section 25-F of the
Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, not being complied with. However, the workman was granted only back wages. The
Hon’ble Supreme Court, on considering the fact that there was nothing to show that the workman had been appointed
in accordance with the Recruitment Rules for filling up a vacancy, in terms of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution,
besides the fact that the dispute was raised after 12 years, the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the interest of justice
would be sub-served, if the Corporation was made to pay a sum of Rs. 50,000/- to the workman.
In the case of Nand Kumar vs. State of Bihar and others reported in (2014) 5 SCC 300, the Hon’ble Supreme Court
considered the judgment of the Constitution Bench in the case of State of Karnataka vs. Uma Devi reported in (2006)
4 SCC 1, where it had held that while directing the appointments, temporary or casual, be regularized or made
permanent, the Courts are swayed by the fact that the concerned person had worked for some time. It is not as if the
person who accepts an engagement either temporary or casual in nature, is not aware of the nature of his employment.
1132
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
He accepts the employment with eyes open. It may be true that he is not in a position to bargain since he might have
been searching for some employment so as to eke out his livelihood and accepts whatever he gets. But on that ground
alone, it would not be appropriate to jettison the constitutional scheme of appointment and to take the view that a
person who has temporarily or casually got employed should be directed to be continued permanently. By doing so, it
would be creating another mode of public appointment which is not permissible. (see also State of Orissa vs.
MamataMohanty reported in (2011) 3 SCC 436).
Further the Madhya Pradesh Hon’ble High Court in the case of Branch Manager, Central Bank of India
TilakChowkVidisha Versus Pradeep Kumar Sen reported in 2024 (181) FLR 809 held as under:-
“22. The Supreme Court in the case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Vs. Bhurumal, reported in (2014) 7
SCC 177 has held as under:-
"33. It is clear from the reading of the aforesaid judgments that the ordinary principle of grant of
reinstatement with full back wages, when the termination is found to be illegal is not applied
mechanically in all cases. While that may be a position where services of a regular/permanent
workman are terminated illegally and/or mala fide and/or by way of victimisation, unfair labour
practice, etc. However, when it comes to the case of termination of a daily-wage worker and where
the termination is found illegal because of a procedural defect, namely, in violation of Section 25-F
of the Industrial Disputes Act, this Court is consistent in taking the view that in such cases
reinstatement with back wages is not automatic and instead the workman should be given monetary
compensation which will meet the ends of justice. Rationale for shifting in this direction is obvious."
23. The Supreme Court in the case of JayantVasantraoHiwarkar Vs. AnoopGanpatraoBobde and others
reported in (2017)11 SCC 244 has upheld the grant of compensation in lieu of reinstatement as the
respondent had merely worked for a period of one year.
24. The Supreme Court in the case of HariNandan Prasad and another Vs. Employer I/R to Management of
Food Corporation of India and another, reported in (2014) 7 SCC 190 has held as under:-
''19. The following passages from the said judgment would reflect the earlier decisions of this Court
on the question of reinstatement: (BSNL case, SCC pp. 187-88, paras 29-30)
"29. The learned counsel for the appellant referred to two judgments wherein this Court granted
compensation instead of reinstatement. In BSNL v. Man Singh, this Court has held that when the
termination is set aside because of violation of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, it is not
necessary that relief of reinstatement be also given as a matter of right. In Incharge Officer v.
Shankar Shetty, it was held that those cases where the workman had worked on daily-wage basis,
and worked merely for a period of 240 days or 2 to 3 years and where the termination had taken
place many years ago, the recent trend was to grant compensation in lieu of reinstatement.
30. In this judgment of Shankar Shetty, this trend was reiterated by referring to various judgments,
as is clear from the following discussion: (SCC pp. 127-28, paras 2-4)
'2. Should an order of reinstatement automatically follow in a case where the engagement of a
daily-wager has been brought to an end in violation of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947 (for short "the ID Act")?The course of the decisions of this Court in recent years has been
uniform on the above question.
3. In Jagbir Singh v. Haryana State Agriculture Mktg. Board, delivering the judgment of this Court,
one of us (R.M. Lodha, J.) noticed some of the recent decisions of this Court, namely, U.P. State
Brassware Corpn. Ltd. v.UdayNarainPandey, Uttaranchal Forest Development Corpn.v. M.C.
Joshi, State of M.P. v. Lalit Kumar Verma, M.P. Admn. v. Tribhuban, Sita Ram v. MotiLal Nehru
Farmers Training Institute, Jaipur Development Authority v. Ramsahai, GDA v. Ashok Kumar and
Mahboob Deepak v. Nagar Panchayat, Gajraula and stated as follows: (Jagbir Singh case, SCC
pp.330 & 335, paras 7 & 14)
"7. It is true that the earlier view of this Court articulated in many decisions reflected the legal
position that if the termination of an employee was found to be illegal, the relief of reinstatement
with full back wages would ordinarily follow. However, in recent past, there has been a shift in the
legal position and in a long line of cases, this Court has consistently taken the view that relief by
way of reinstatement with back wages is not automatic and may be wholly inappropriate in a given
fact situation even though the termination of an employee is in contravention of the prescribed
procedure. Compensation instead of reinstatement has been held to meet the ends of justice.
14. It would be, thus, seen that by a catena of decisions in recent time, this Court has clearly laid
down that an order of retrenchment passed in violation of Section 25-F although may be set aside
but an award of reinstatement should not, however, be automatically passed. The award of
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1133
reinstatement with full back wages in a case where the workman has completed 240 days of work in
a year preceding the date of termination, particularly, daily-wagers has not been found to be proper
by this Court and instead compensation has been awarded.This Court has distinguished between a
daily-wager who does not hold a post and a permanent employee."
4. Jagbir Singh has been applied very recently in Telegraph Deptt. v. Santosh Kumar Seal, wherein
this Court stated:(SCC p. 777, para 11)
11. In view of the aforesaid legal position and the fact that the workmen were engaged as daily-
wagers about 25 years back and they worked hardly for 2 or 3 years, relief of reinstatement and
back wages to them cannot be said to be justified and instead monetary compensation would
subserve the ends of justice.'"
21. We make it clear that reference to Umadevi, in the aforesaid discussion is in a situation where
the dispute referred pertained to termination alone. Going by the principles carved out above, had
it been a case where the issue is limited only to the validity of termination, Appellant 1 would not be
entitled to reinstatement...........''
25. The Supreme Court in the case of O.P.Bhandari Vs. Indian Tourism Development Corporation Limited
and others reported in (1986) 4 SCC 337 has held as under :-
"6. Time is now ripe to turn to the next question as to whether it is obligatory to direct reinstatement
when the concerned regulation is found to be void. In the sphere of employer-employee relations in
public sector undertakings, to which Article 12 of the Constitution of India is attracted, it cannot be
posited that reinstatement must invariably follow as a consequence of holding that an order of
termination of service of an employee is void. No doubt in regard to "blue collar" workmen and
"white collar"employees other than those belonging to the managerial or similar high level cadre,
reinstatement would be a rule, and compensation in lieu thereof a rare exception. Insofar as the
high level managerial cadre is concerned, the matter deserves to be viewed from an altogether
different perspective -- a larger perspective which must take into account the demands of National
Interest and the resultant compulsion to ensure the success of the public sector in its competitive co-
existence with the private sector. The public sector can never fulfil its life aim or successfully vie
with the private sector if it is not managed by capable and efficient personnel with unimpeachable
integrity and the requisite vision, who enjoy the fullest confidence of the "policy-makers" of such
undertakings. Then and then only can the public sector undertaking achieve the goals of (1)
maximum production for the benefit of the community, (2) social justice for workers, consumers and
the people, and (3) reasonable return on the public funds invested in the undertaking.
7. It is in public interest that such undertakings or their Boards of Directors are not compelled and
obliged to entrust their managements to personnel in whom, on reasonable grounds, they have no
trust or faith and with whom they are in a bona fide manner unable to function harmoniously as a
team working arm-in-arm with success in the aforesaid three-dimensional sense as their common
goal. These factors have to be taken into account by the court at the time of passing the
consequential order, for the court has full discretion in the matter of granting relief, and the court
can sculpture the relief to suit the needs of the matter at hand. The court, if satisfied that ends of
justice so demand, can certainly direct that the employer shall have the option not to reinstate
provided the employer pays reasonable compensation as indicated by the court."
A division Bench of Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Range Forest Officer Versus
VirjibhaiRanchhodbhai& another reported in 2024 (182) FLR 179 has held as under:-
6.1. The shift in law on this count was highlighted by the Supreme Court in Bhopal Vs. Santosh Kumar
Seal [(2010) 6 SCC 773] relying on its own another decision in Jagbir Singh Vs. Haryana State Agriculture
Marketing Board [(2009) 15 SCC 327], observing that the relief of payment of lump-sum compensation
could be a proper relief in a given set of facts and circumstances.
"In the last few years it has been consistently held by this Court that relief by way of reinstatement
with back wages is not automatic even if termination of an employee is found to be illegal or is in
contravention of the prescribed procedure and that monetary compensation in lieu of reinstatement
and back wages in cases of such nature may be appropriate. (See U.P. State Brassware Corpn.Ltd.
v. UdayNarainPandey [2006 (1) SCC 479], Uttaranchal Forest Development Corpn.v. M.C.
Joshi [2007 (9) SCC 353], State of M.P. v. Lalit Kumar Verma [2007 (1) SCC 575], M.P.
Admn. v. Tribhuban [2007 (9) SCC 748], Sita Ram v. MotiLal Nehru Farmers Training
Institute [2008 (5) SCC 75], Jaipur Development Authority v. Ramsahai [2006 (11) SCC 684],
GDA v. Ashok Kumar [2008 (4) SCC 261] and Mahboob Deepak v. Nagar Panchayat,
Gajraula [2008 (1) SCC 575].)"
1134
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
6.2. In subsequent decision in Rajasthan Development Corporation Vs.Gitam Singh [(2013) 5 SCC 136], the
Supreme Court stated,
"From the long line of cases indicated above, it can be said without any fear of contradiction that this
Court has not held as an absolute proposition that in cases of wrongful dismissal, the dismissed
employee is entitled to reinstatement in all situations. It has always been the view of this Court that there
could be circumstance(s) in a case which may make it inexpedient to order reinstatement. Therefore, the
normal rule that the dismissed employee is entitled to reinstatement in cases of wrongful dismissal has
been held to be not without exception. Insofar as wrongful termination of daily-rated workers is
concerned, this Court has laid down that consequential relief would depend on host of factors, namely,
manner and method of appointment, nature of employment and length of service. Where the length of
engagement as daily wager has not been long, award of reinstatement should not follow and rather
compensation should be directed to be paid. A distinction has been drawn between a daily wager and an
employee holding the regular post for the purposes of consequential relief."
6.3. In Uttaranchal Forest Development Corporation Vs. M.C.Joshi [(2007) 9 SCC 353], the Supreme Court
held that the question of grant of compensation in place of relief of reinstatement could be guided by
relevant factors to be that whether the appointment was made in accordance with the statutory Rules or not.
6.4. It is to be observed that the decisions of the Supreme Court have carved out the circumstances and
aspects which may guide the discretion of the court in awarding lump-sum compensation instead of granting
relief of reinstatement even if there is a breach of Section 25F, 25G and 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act.
6.5. These factors were highlighted in Bantva Municipality Vs. AmritlalHarjiChauhan being Special Civil
Application No.9135 of 2013 decided on 31.3.2014 as under :-
"(i) The fact that the workman is daily-rated workmen, not permanently employed; (ii) He is not holding a
permanent post; (iii) Nature of his employment; (iv) Span of service, viz. The period during which he
worked upto the date of termination of services; (v) Manner and method of appointment. Whether it was a
backdoor entry; (vi) The time gap from the date of termination; (vii) Delay in raising the Reference is
also considered to be a germane factor;(viii) Any special feature peculiar to the facts of the particular
case.
For instance, in Bhurumal (supra), the Supreme Court noticed that post which the workman held was of
Lineman in the Telephone Department, and that the work of Lineman was drastically reduced in view of
advancement of the technology."
6.6. In the case of BSNL v. Bhurumal, reported in (2014) 7 SCC 177, it was categorically observed that even
after reinstatement, it is always open to the management to terminate the services of that employee by paying
him the retrenchment compensation. Even as a daily-wage worker, no useful purpose is going to be served in
reinstating such a workman and he can be given monetary compensation by the Court itself.”
Thus it is clearly established by the parties that Sri Surendra Kumar Maurya was engaged in the establishment on the
post of Business Facilitator and his services were retrenched on 04.06.2013. As such as per law which are referred
hereinabove the workman Sri Surendra Kumar Maurya is entitled for compensation as his service was retrenched
without complying the provisions of Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act 1947 but he is not entitled for
reinstatement as prayed by him.
AWARD
For the foregoing reasons as the services of Sri Surendra Kumar Mauryawas engaged as casual labour on 07.11.2009
and his services were retrenched w.e.f. 04.6.2013 without following the provisions of Section 25-F of Industrial
Disputes Act 1947, hence, he is entitled for compensation amounting to Rs.1.50 lacs (Rupees One lacs &Fifty
thousand only) but not for retrenchment in services.
The reference No.L-12012/35/2017 - IR(B-II) Dated 27.07.2017 is answered accordingly.
Kanpur.
Justice ANIL KUMAR, Presiding Officer
13th December, 2024
Let two copies of this award be sent to the Ministry for publication.
नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 411.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj गुरवबंिर वसंि मान सुरक्षा एिेंसी ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V
vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
–सि–
]
िबलपुर
ds iapkV
(एलसी/आर/41/
) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[सं. एल-22012/14/2016-आईआर(सी.एम-II)]
मजणकंिन.एन, उप जनिेिक
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1135
New Delhi, the 6th March, 2025
S.O. 411.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Reference.LC/R/41/2016) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the
Management of Gurbinder Singh Mann Security Agency, and their workmen, received by the Central Government
on 27/02/2025.
[No. L-22012/14/2016-IR(CM-II)]
MANIKANDAN. N, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/41/2016
Present: P.K.Srivastava
H.J.S..(Retd)
Shri James Ekka, Security Guard,
Central Mine Planning and Design Institute Ltd.,
Kusmunda Camp, Kusmunda,
Distt. Korba (CG)
Korba (Chattisgarh)
Workman
Vs
1.
The General Manger,
Central Mine, Planning & Design Institute Limited,
RI-V, Seepat Road,
Bilaspur(CG)- 495006
2.
M/s Gurbinder Singh Maan Security Agency,
3022, House No. 161, Section- 12,
Panchkula – 134109,
Haryana,
Panchkula (Haryana)
Management
(JUDGMENT)
(Passed on this 20th day of January-2025)
As per letter dated 26/04/2016 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
made to this Tribunal under Section-10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the ‘Act’) as per Notification
No. L-22012/14/2016 - IR (CM-II) dt. 26/04/2016. The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether the action on the part of the CMPDI management, Bilaspur as well as the contractor
M/s Gurbinder Singh Mann Security Agency in not paying the proper differential wages to two Nos. of
Security Guards, namely Shri Jagdev Lal Srivastava and Shri Arun Kumar Tiwary and O.T. payment to
the workers doing over time work and withdrawing the concessionary privileges such as not providing
uniform, deduction of HRA in respect of workers for 4 months period is appropriate and justified? If not,
what the Security Guards engaged at Korba and Kusmunda camp by the Security Agency namely
M/s Gurbinder Singh Maan under the control of the management CMPDI, Bilaspur are entitled to?”
The workmen never appeared and did not file any statement of claim.
The Management file its written statement of defense with a case that they are Licensed Principle
Employer and execute several miscellaneous work such as Up-keeping of Colonies etc., for which they allotted
contracts to various contractors registered under Contract Labour (R&A) Act, they awarded contract to different
contractors at different times for different periods and the wages of the employees of Contractors were paid by the
Contractors themselves and not by the Management of CMPDI.
1136
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
There was never any claim regarding less payment.
Management has filed and proved as many as 16 documents relating to various contractors.
No evidence documentary or affidavit has been filed by the Workman. As stated earlier, the Workmen did
not file even their statement of claim. They never appeared in this case since 2016. The burden to put and prove their
claim is on Workmen in which they are failed.
Hence, holding the claim of the Workmen not proved. The reference deservers to be answered against
the Workmen and is answered accordingly.
No order as to cost.
DATE:- 20/01/2025
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 412.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj डब्ल्यू.सी.एल.ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksA vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa
–सि–
] िबलपुर ds iapkV(एलसी/आर/20 /
)
dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[सं. एल-22012/107/2015-आईआर(सी.एम-II)]
मजणकंिन.एन, उप जनिेिक
New Delhi, the 6th March, 2025
S.O. 412.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Reference.LC/R/20/2016) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the
Management of W.C.L, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 27/02/2025.
[No. L-22012/107/2015-IR(CM-II)]
MANIKANDAN. N, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/20/2016
Present: P.K.Srivastava
H.J.S..(Retd)
President,
Rashtriya Koyla Khadan Mazdoor Sangh (INTUC),
PO: Pathakhera Area,
Distt. Betul (MP)
Betul: 460001
Workman
Vs
The General Manager,
Western Coalfields Limited,
Regional Workshop,
PO : Pathakhera Area,
Distt. Betul (MP)
Betul - 460001
Management
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1137
(JUDGMENT)
(Passed on this 16th day of January-2025)
As per letter dated 22/01/2016 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
made to this Tribunal under Section-10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the ‘Act’) as per Notification
No. L-22012/107/2015 - IR (CM-II) dt. 22/01/2016. The dispute under reference relates to:
“Whether, the action of the management of General Manager, Western Coalfields Limited, Regional
Workshop, Pathakhera Area in not correcting the date of birth of Shri Vijayshankar Mishra, Electrical Fitter,
Grade ‘B’ as 26.10.55 as per initial Form ‘B’ Register and superannuating him w.e.f. 31.10.2013 is justified? If
not, what relief the workman is entitled for?”
Case of the Workman is mainly that, he was first appointed with the Management on 16.04.1976 and has
been superannuated on 31.10.2013 by Management treating his date of Birth as 10.01.1953 in his Matriculation
Certificate, whereas his actual date of birth is 26.10.1955 which has been consistently recorded in the records of the
Management viz; Form B, PS Form 3 and 4, NEIS Data, Pan Card, Pay Slip, which is arbitrary, unjust and illegal. The
Workman was first served a notice of his superannuation on 30.04.2013 informing him that he would be
superannuated after completing 60 years of age on 31.10.2013. According to the Workman, he made a representation
after getting the notice of superannuation with the Management and requested them to superannuate him on the basis
of his date of birth 26.10.1953 recorded in the records of the Management as well supported by other documents like
his Pan-card, Adhaar Card etc., but of no avail. Thereafter, he raised a dispute in this respect with the Assistant Labour
Commissioner, Central; no conciliation could be reached at, hence this reference.
The Workman has thus prayed that holding the action of Management in superannuating him on
31.10.2013 on the basis of his date of birth recorded in his Matriculation Certificate arbitrary, unjust and unlawful, he
be held entitled to be reinstated with all back wages and benefits in service and post retrial, deeming to be in
continuous service of Management till date of his Superannuation i.e. 31.10.2015, based on his date of birth
26.10.1955, recorded in the records of Management.
Case of Management is mainly that, at the time of his first appointment, the Workman declared his date of
Birth was 26.10.1955. Hence, the date of birth disclosed by him was recorded in records of the Management Form B,
Service Excerpts and Service Book. The same date of birth was recorded in Form PS 3 and PS 4 by Management on
the basis of information submitted by him. In 1989, when a Departmental Promotion Committee was considering his
promotion to the post of Electric Helper, he submitted his High School Certificate which he had passed form Board of
Secondary Education, M.P. Bhopal in 1970. This certificate contained his date of birth as 16.10.1953. Keeping in
view the discrepancy regarding his date of Birth in his Service Records and his Matriculation Certificate, this
discrepancy was corrected in light of Implementation Instructions 76 (I.I. 76) which provides that in case of
appointees who have passed Matriculation or Qualification Examination, the date of the Birth Recorded in the
said certificate will not be altered in any circumstances. It is further the case of Management that, the Workman was
superannuated after attaining 60 years of age on the basis of his date of birth 26.10.1953 as recorded in his
Matriculation Certificate which is just legal and proper on the part of the Management. Management has thus
requested that the reference be answered against the Workman.
In evidence the parties have filed almost same documents which are Copy of Appointment Letter dated
23.04.1976, Form B, Service Excerpts, Form PS 3 and PS 4, Service Book and Copy of Matriculation Mark-sheet and
Certificate.
The Workman has not filed any affidavit nor his Management filed any affidavit.
In-spite of many opportunities given, none appeared from the side of Workman for argument. I have heard
argument of Mr. Neeraj Kewat, Learned Counsel for Management and have gone through the record. No written
arguments have been filed by any of the parties.
On perusal of record in the light of argument, the only issue arises for consideration is as follows:
1. Whether the action of Management taking the date of birth of the Workman Vijayshankar Mishra
recorded in his Matriculation Certificate as correct and superannuating him on this date of birth, is
correct in law or not.
Reference of I.I. 76 requires to be made in this respect which is as follows:
“Matriculates- In the case of appointees who have passed Matriculation of equivalent examination, the
date of birth recorded in the said certificate shall will not be altered under any circumstances.”
Since it is not disputed that a Workman is matriculate; he had completed his Matriculation in year 1970 that is
before the date of his first joining in 1976. This certificate is the first and oldest document regarding date of his birth.
Rest of the documents ie; his service records have been prepared after his joining in service and particulars have been
1138
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
filed on the basis of information furnished by him. Naturally, the Matriculation certificate will get precedence over
these records. In the same way, the PAN Card and Adhaar Card have also been prepared after joining service, hence
these documents will also not get precedence over Matriculation Certificate. Hence, in the light of above discussion
and proposition of law on this point, the action of Management in placing reliance on his date of birth recorded in his
Matriculation Certificate and giving precedence to it over the Service Records of the Workman, in which his date of
birth has been recorded on information furnished by him, cannot be held unjust or arbitrary. Consequently, holding
this action of Management just legal and proper, the reference deserves to be answered and is being answered as
follows.
AWARD
Holding the action of Management of General Mazdoor Western Coal Field Limited, Regional
Workshop, Pathakhera Area, in not correcting the date of Birth of Workman Vijayshankar Mishra, Electrical
Fitter, Grade ‘B’ as 26.10.1955 as per initial Form B Register and superannuating him w.e.f. 31.10.2013
justified in law, he is held entitled to no benefits.
No order as to cost.
DATE:- 16/01/2025
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 413.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj डब्ल्यू.सी.एल.ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
– सि –
] जबलपुर
dsiapkV(एलसी/आर/56/
) dks
izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[सं. एल-22013/01/2025-आईआर(सी.एम-II)]
मजणकंिन.एन, उप जनिेिक
New Delhi, the 6th March, 2025
S.O. 413.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Reference.LC/R/56/2023) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the
Management of W.C.L, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 22/02/2025
[No. L-22013/01/2025-IR(CM-II)]
MANIKANDAN. N, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/56/2023
Present: P.K.Srivastava
H.J.S..( Retd)
R.K.K.M.S. (INTUC),
Regional Chandameta,
Dist. Chhindwara (M.P.)- 480447
Workman
Versus
The General Manager,
W.C.L, Pench Area,
Parasia
Management
AWARD
(Passed on this 10th day of January-2025.)
Vide communication reference number CHA-1(2)/2021 by the Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central)
Jabalpur, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi this reference is sent to the Tribunal under section-10 of Industrial Disputes Act,
1947 (in short the ‘Act’) The dispute under reference related to :-
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1139
“क्त् या संयुक्त् त मिामंत्री राष् रीय कोयला खिान मििूर संघ (इंटक), र्ांिामेटा, जिला-वछंिवाड़ा का मिाप्रबंिक,
वेस्ट् टनच कोल जलजमटेड पेंर् क्षेत्र, पराजसया जिला वछंिवाड़ा से उरिन ओपन कास्ट् ट मांइस के कामगार श्रीं नईम अिमि
माइवनंग सरिार टो न १५७ की पिोन् नजत ओव् िरमेन पि पर दकये िाने एवं जपछली वरीयता सजित आर्थचक क्षजत पूती का
लाभ प्रिान दकये िाने का िावा न् यायोजर्त िै? यदि िा तो श्री नईम अिमि माइवनंग सरिार वेस्ट् टनच कोल जलजमटेड से दकस
अनुतोष के अजिकारी िै? ”
After registering the case on reference received, notices were sent to the parties and were duly served on
them. Time was allotted to the workman to submit his statement of claim. In spite of the allotment of time and service
of notice, the workman never turned up and submitted his statement of claim. Management also did not file its written
statement of claim/ defence. No evidence was ever produced by any of the parties in this Tribunal.
The Initial burden to prove his claim is on the workman. Since the workman did not file any pleading nor did
he file any evidence, in the absence of any evidence in support of holding the claim of the workman not proved, the
reference deserves to be answered against the workman and is answered accordingly.
AWARD
In the light of this factual backdrop, holding that the claim of the workman is not proved, the
reference deserves to be answered against the Workman and is answered accordingly.
Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per
rules.
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
DATE: 10/01/2025
नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 414.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj डब्ल्यू.सी.एल.ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
– सि –
] िबलपुर dsiapkV(एलसी/आर/03/
) dks
izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[सं. एल-22012/112/2022-आईआर(सी.एम-II)]
मजणकंिन.एन, उप जनिेिक
New Delhi, the 6th March, 2025
S.O. 414.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Reference.LC/R/03/2023) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the
Management of W.C.L, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 27/02/2025
[No. L-22012/112/2022-IR(CM-II)]
MANIKANDAN. N, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR
COURT, JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/03/2023
Present: P.K.Srivastava
H.J.S..( Retd)
The Joint General Secretary,
National Coal Mine Workers Union (INTUC),
Regional, Chandmeta, District Chhindwara,
Madhya Pradesh - 480447
Workman
1140
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Versus
The Deputy Area Manager,
WCL Shivpuri Sub Area,
WCL Pench Area, Post - Sirgora,
Tehsil - Parasia, District - Chhindwara,
Madhya Pradesh - 480001
Management
AWARD
(Passed on this 04th day of Fabuary-2025.)
As per letter dated 05/01/2023 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
received. The reference is made to this tribunal under section-10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per reference number L-
22012/112/2022 - IR(CM-II) dt. 05/01/2023. The dispute under reference related to :-
“क्त्या राष्ट्रीय कोयला खिान मििूर संघ (इंटक), रीिनल र्ांिामेटा जिला वछंिवाड़ा (म० प्र०) का जवष्णुपुरी
खान नं 2 के कामगार श्री अरजवन्ि पाल जपता रािाराम पाल मेकेजनकल दफटर िेल्पर केटेगरी 2 को मेकेजनकल दफटर
केटेगरी 4 में जपछला सुिार कर पिोन्नत दकये िाने का उप क्षेत्र प्रबंिक, वेकोजल जिवपुरी उपक्षेत्र, वेकोजल पेंर् क्षेत्र,
तिसील पराजसया, जिला वछंिवाड़ा, (म.प्र.) से िावा न्यायोजर्त िै? यदि िााँ, तो उक्त कामगार प्रबंिन से क्त्या अनुतोष
पाने का अजिकारी िै ?”
After registering the case on reference received, notices were sent to the parties and were duly served on
them. Time was allotted to the workman to submit his statement of claim. In spite of the allotment of time and service
of notice, the workman never turned up and submitted his statement of claim. Management also did not file its written
statement of claim/ defence. No evidence was ever produced by any of the parties in this Tribunal.
The Initial burden to prove his claim is on the workman. Since the workman did not file any pleading nor did
he file any evidence, in the absence of any evidence in support of holding the claim of the workman not proved, the
reference deserves to be answered against the workman and is answered accordingly.
AWARD
In the light of this factual backdrop, holding that the claim of the workman is not proved, the
reference deserves to be answered against the Workman and is answered accordingly.
Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as
per rules.
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
DATE: 04/02/2025
नई दिल्ली, 6 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 415.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj डब्ल्यू.सी.एल.ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa
– सि –
] िबलपुर
dsiapkV(एलसी/आर/30/
) dks
izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks
dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[सं. एल-22012/60/2022-आईआर(सी.एम-II)]
मजणकंिन.एन, उप जनिेिक
New Delhi, the 6th March, 2025
S.O. 415.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Reference.LC/R/30/2022) of the Central Government Industrial
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1141
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the
Management of W.C.L, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 22/02/2025.
[No. L-22012/60/2022-IR(CM-II)]
MANIKANDAN. N, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/30/2022
Present: P.K.Srivastava
H.J.S..(Retd)
450331
Workman
Vs
480551
Management
(JUDGMENT)
(Passed on this 27th day of January-2025)
As per letter dated 28/06/2022 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
made to this Tribunal under Section-10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the ‘Act’)as per Notification
No. L-22012/60/2022-IR(CM-II) dt. 28/06/2022. The dispute under reference relates to:
"क्त्या मुख्य मिाप्रबंिक, वेकोजल, कन्िान क्षेत्र डुंगररआ वछंिवाड़ा (म.प्र.) द्वारा कामगार स्ट्व झीनी बाई भू.पु.
िनरल मििूर की कजथत बखाचस्ट्तगी के पिात उनकी मृत्यु के उपरान्त उनके आजश्रत पुत्र श्री मिेि जपता स्ट्व. षंकरलाल को
अनुकम्पा जनयुजक्त निीं दिया िाना उजर्त िैं यदि निीं तो क्त्या श्री मिेि जपता स्ट्व. षंकरलाल अनुकम्पा जनयुजक्त प्राप्त करने
के अजिकारी िै ?”
According to the Workman Union, the Workman Smt. Jhinni Bai, was an employee of Management, she
died on 15.01.2006. Mahesh is her son, he has claimed compassionate appointment on the ground of death of his
Mother which was refused by Management. Thereafter, he raised an Industrial Dispute through the Union which
cannot be conciliated, hence this reference.
The Workman side has prayed that the Son of the deceased workman be held entitled to compassionate
appointment.
Case of Management is mainly that, Jhinni Bai, was posted as a Wagon Loader, she was terminated from
services for the mis-conduct of unauthorizedly and wilfully absenting herself from Work, by Management on
27.08.2003. All her dues were cleared by management she never challenged her dismissal from service and died three
years after her dismissal. And see National Coal Wage Agreement – VII (in short NCWA-VII) does not provide for
compassionate appointment to dependants of a Worker who dies after retirement or after dismissal of his services
Hence, according to Management the claim of the Union for compassionate appointment is not tenable.
Though none of the parties have filed any affidavits, but since the facts are almost admitted and the
reference involves only law point, hence it is being considered as such.
1142
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
I have heard arguments of Learned Counsel Shri Rama Shankar Yadav for Union and Shri Neeraj Kewat
for Management and I have gone through the record.
On perusal of record in the light of the rival argument, following issues comes up for determination:
1. Whether the claim of the Son of the deceased employee Jhinni Bai who died after her dismissal from
service, for compassionate appointment is tenable in law or not?
2. Clause 9.3.0 of NCWA- VII is being reproduced as follows:
9.3.0 Provision of Employment to Dependant
(i) The clauses 9.3.0, 9.4.0 & 9.5.0 of NCWA-VI will be operative in NCWA-VII till a revised scheme
is jointly prepared keeping in view the various verdicts of Hon'ble Supreme Court at the earliest.
(ii) The dependants appointed under the provision of NCWA-VI and presently on stipend as on
15.7.05 l.e. the date of signing NCWA-VII agreement shall be regularized in Cat.1.
(iii) The dependants who shall be appointed under NCWA-VII provision after 15.7.05 shall be
appointed on basic wage of Cat.I as Trainee for a period of six months. However, during training
period they will have the status of permanent employee. On completion of statutory training they
shall be regularized as Cat. I employee. They shall undergo Vocational Training under the
statutory provisions from the date of appointment.
(iv) In case of discrepancies, if any, the matter will be discussed in Standardisation Committee.
NCWA Clause 9.1.0 – 9.5.0 :-
9.1.0
Life cover Scheme
The existing Life cover Scheme will continue except that the amount to be paid in addition to the
normal gratuity shall be Rs. 30,000/- and that the Life cover Scheme shall be delinked from gratuity.
It will be effective from 1.1.2000. However, those died before 1.1.2000 and if their dependants have
not been paid till date will also be paid at the above rate.
9.2.0
Workmen's Compensation Benefits
It is agreed that-
9.2.1
The employees covered by this Agreement shall be entitled to the benefits admissible under the
Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.
9.2.2
The benefits under the Workmen's Compensation Act will not be affected adversely on account of
the revision of wages by this Agreement.
9.2.3
An employee who is disabled due to accident arising out of and during the course of employment,
will get full basic wages and dearness allowance from the date of accident till he/she is declared fit
by the Company's Medical Officer. The disabled employee will have to remain under the treatment
of the Coal Company's Medical Officer or in a hospital approved/referred by the coal company to
be entitled to the benefit.
9.2.4
The compensation shall be paid on the basis of the last wages drawn immediately before the
employee met with the accident.
9.2.5
It is further agreed that the payment of wages made to employees during the period of temporary
disablement due to accident arising out of and in course of employment will not be deducted from
the lumpsum amount payable towards compensation for any permanent, partial or total disablement
resulting therefrom.
9.2.6
In addition to the compensation payable under the Workmen's Compensation Act, an ex gratia
amount of Rs. 25000/- in case of death or permanent total disablement resulting on account of
accident arising out of and in course employment will be paid. It will be effective from 1.1.2000.
However, pending cases of those employees who died before 1.1.2000 and if the benefit has not been
paid to the dependant till 1.1.2000 will also be paid at the above rate
9.3.0
Provision of Employment to Dependants
9.3.1
Employment would be provided to one dependant of workers who are disabled permanently and
also those who die while in service. The provision will be implemented as follows
9.3.2
Employment to one dependant of the worker who dies while in service
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1143
In so far as female dependants are concerned, their employment/payment of monetary
compensation would be governed by para 9.5.3.
9.3.3
The dependent for this purpose means the wife husband as the case may be, unmarried daughter,
son and legally adopted son. if no such direct dependant is available for employment, brother,
widowed daughter/widowed daughter-in-law or son-in-law residing with the deceased and almost
wholly dependant on the earnings of the deceased may be considered to be the dependant of the
deceased
9.3.4
The dependants to be considered for employment should be physically fit and suitable for
employment and aged not more than 35 years provided that the age limit in case of employment of
female spouse would be 45 years as given in Clause 9.5.0. In so far as male spouse is concerned,
there would be no age limit regarding provision of employment.
9.4.0
Employment to one dependant of a worker who is permanently disabled in his place
(i) The disablement of the worker concerned should arise from injury or disease, be of a
permanent nature resulting into loss of employment and it should be so certified by the Coal
Company concerned.
(ii)
In case of disablement arising out of general physical debility so certified by the Coal
Company, the employee concerned will be eligible for the benefit under this clause if he/she is
upto the age of 58 years.
The term ‘general physical debility' would mean deficiency of a workman due to any disease or
other health reason leading to his/her disablement to perform his/her duties regularly and/or
efficiently.
(iii) The dependant for this purpose means the wife/husband as the case may b, unmarried daughter,
son and legally adopted son. If no such direct dependant is available for employment, brother,
widowed daughter/widowed daughter-in-law or son-in-law residing with the employee and
almost wholly dependent on the earning of the employee may be considered
In so far as female dependants are concerned, their employment would be governed by the
provisions of clause 9.5.0
(iv) The dependants to be considered for employment should be physically fit and suitable for
employment and aged not more than 35 years provided that the age limit in case of employment
of female spouse would be 45 years as given in Clause 9.5.0. In so far as male spouse is
concerned, there would be no age limit regarding provision of employment
9.5.0
Employment/Monetary compensation to female dependant
Provision of employment/monetary compensation to female dependants of workmen who die
while in service and who are declared medically unfit as per Clause 9.4.0 above would be
regulated as under :
(i) In case of death due to mine accident, the female dependant would have the option to either
accept the monetary compensation of Rs. 4,000/- per month or employment irrespective of her
age.
(ii) In case of death/total permanent disablement due to cause other than mine accident. and
medical unfitness under Clause 9.40, if the female dependant is below the age of 45 years she
will have the option either to accept the monetary compensation of Rs. 3,000 per month or
employment.
In case the female dependant is above 45 years of age she will be entitled only to monetary
compensation and not to employment.
(iii) In case of death either in mine accident or for other reasons or medical unfitness under Clause
9.4.0, if no employment has been offered and the male dependant of the concerned worker is 12
years and above in age, he will be kept on a live roster and would be provided employment
commensurate with his skill and qualifications when he attains the age of 18 years During the
period the male dependant is on live roster, the female dependant will be paid monetary
compensation as per rates at paras (i) & la above. This will be effective from 1.1.2000.
It is clear from the perusal of aforesaid provisions that no right of compassionate appointment to
dependant of the terminating employee or an employee died while not in service, hence the claim of the Workman
union is held not tenable.
Accordingly, the reference is answered as follows.
1144
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AWARD
The claimant Mahesh is held not entitle to be considered for compassionate appointment after death of
his Mother, dismissed employee.
No order as to cost.
DATE:- 27/01/2025
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 7 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 416.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्रीय सरकार
डाकघर अिीक्षक, यवतमाल जडवीिन, डाक जवभाग (भारत),यवतमाल (एम.एस.); उप डाकघर, डाक जवभाग (भारत),
कलंब, ति- कलंब, यवतमाल (एम.एस.), के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री गोपाल वसंतराव नागोसे, कामगार, के
बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केंरीय सरकार औद्योजगक न्यायाजिकरण-सि-श्रम न्यायालय, नागपुर, पंर्ाट (संिभच संख्या
(Case.No. CGIT/NGP/ 76/2018-19) को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै,प्रकाजित करती िै िो केन्रीय सरकार
को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 25.02.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-40012/10/2018-आईआर(डीयू)]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 7th March, 2025
S.O. 416.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Case.No.CGIT/NGP/76/2018-19) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court, Nagpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers
in relation to The Suptd. Of Post Offices, Yavatmal Division, Dept. Of Posts (India), Yavatmal (M.S.); the Sub
Post Offices, Dept. Of Posts (India), Kalamb, Yavatmal (M.S.),and Shri Gopal Vasantrao Nagose, Worker,
which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 25.02.2025.
[No. L-40012/10/2018-IR(DU)]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI SHIV SHANKER PRASAD PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR
COURT, NAGPUR
Case No.CGIT/NGP/76/2018-19
Date: 10.02.2025.
Party No. 1:
The Suptd. Of Post Offices,
Yavatmal Division, Dept. Of Posts (India),
Yavatmal (M.S.) – 455001.
The Sub Post Offices,
Dept. Of Posts (India), at Kalamb,
Tah- Kalamb, Yavatmal (M.S.) - 455001
V/s
Party No. 2:
Sh. Gopal Vasantrao Nagose S/o Lt. Sh. Vasantrao
Ex. GDSMD, At. Inchora, Post-Ashti
Tah- Kalamb, Distt – Yavatmal
Yavatmal (M.S.) – 455002.
AWARD
(Dated: 10th February, 2025)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1145
dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of Superintendent of Post Office, Yavatmal Division
Dept. of Post Distt. Yavatmal 2. The Sub-Post Office, Kalamb. Dist. Yavatmal, and their workman, Sh. Gopal V.
Nagose S.o. deceased Sh. Vasantrao S. Nagose, Ex. GDS workman, for adjudication, as per letter
No. L-40012/10/20018 (IR(DU)) dated 04.02.2019, with the following schedule:-
“Whether the action of the management of Department of Posts (India), Yavatmal through 1.
Superintendent of Post Office, Yavatmal Division Dept. of Post (India), Dist. Yavatmal 2. The Sub-Post Office,
Kalamb, Tah. Kalamb. Distt. Yavatmal in not providing compassionate appointment to Sh. Gopal V. Nagose
son of Deceased Sh. Vasantrao S. Nagose, Ex. GDS workman, Kalam S.o. Distt. Yavatmal is fair, just and
legal? If not to what relief the concerned applicant is entitled to?”
2. Case is called out. Both the parties are absent. Both the parties are not attending the Court since
05.11.2020 i.e. more than 4 years. Although statement of claim and written statement have been filed by the parties
but no evidence has been filed by the Petitioner as well as the Respondent to support their say/claim. Contents of the
Petitioner contended in the statement of claim are not proved. So, it is closed.
Hence, it is ordered:
ORDER
The action of the management of Department of Posts (India), Yavatmal through 1. Superintendent of
Post Office, Yavatmal Division Dept. of Post (India), Dist. Yavatmal 2. The Sub-Post Office, Kalamb, Tah.
Kalamb. Distt. Yavatmal in not providing compassionate appointment to Sh. Gopal V. Nagose son of Deceased
Sh. Vasantrao S. Nagose, Ex. GDS workman, Kalam S.o. Distt. Yavatmal is fair, just and legal. The workman
is not entitled to any relief.
Justice (Retd.) SHIV SHANKER PRASAD, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 7 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 417.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्रीय सरकार
प्रबंिक, िूरसंर्ार जिला- परभणी, के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री भीमराव अजभमन्यु घुगे, कामगार, के बीर्
अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केंरीय सरकार औद्योजगक न्यायाजिकरण-सि-श्रम न्यायालय, नागपुर,पंर्ाट(संिभच संख्या
Case.No. CGIT/NGP/ 63/2006) को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै,प्रकाजित करती िै िो केन्रीय सरकार को
सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 25.02.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-40012/112/2005-आईआर(डीयू)]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 7th March, 2025
S.O. 417.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Case No.CGIT/NGP/63/2006) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court, Nagpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers
in relation to The Manager, Telecom District - Parbhani, and Shri Bhimrao Abhimanyu Ghuge, Worker, which
was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 25.02.2025.
[No. L-40012/112/2005-IR(DU)]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI SHIV SHANKER PRASAD PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR
COURT, NAGPUR
Case No.CGIT/NGP/63/2006
Date: 13.02.2025.
Party No. 1:
The Telecom District Manager
Parbhani - 421401
V/s.
Party No. 2:
Shri Bhimrao Abhimanyu Ghuge,
At C/o E.N.Govindpure, Bhoipura
Hingoli, Parbhani - 431513
1146
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AWARD
(Dated: 13th February, 2025)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial
dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of Telecom, through its District Manager, (Telecom),
BSNL, Parbhani, Nagpur and the Chief General Manager Telecom, BSNL and their workman, Shri. Bhimrao
Abhimanyu Ghuge, for adjudication, as per letter No. L-40012/112/2005 (IR(DU)) dated 25.05.2006, with the
following schedule:-
“Whether the action of management of Telecom, through its District Manager (Telecom), BSNL,
Parbhani, Nagpur and the Chief General Manager, Telecom, BSNL, 8th Floor, Foundation Building,
Mumbai-I, in terminating the services of Shri Bhimrao Abhimanyu Ghuge, C/o E.N.Govindpure,
Bhoipura, Hingoli, Tehsil : Hingoli, Dist. Parbhani – 431513, is legal, proper & justified? If not, to
what relief the said workman is entitled?”
2.
Case called out. Both the parties are absent. During the course of trial, original petitioner Bhimrao
Abhimanyu Ghuge died on 18.09.2019. Whereas, substitution application has been moved by the legal heirs of the
deceased on 23.12.2019 with delay of four days. Delay condonation application IA no. 06 has also been filed on
23.12.2019. From perusal of record, it is apparent that no one is responding and attending the Court since 03.12.2021
on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that no one is interested to contest the case on behalf of the petitioner.
Therefore, application IA no. 06 as well as application IA no. 05 is hereby rejected. Suit is awaited against the
petitioner due to death of the petitioner Shri Bhimrao Abhimanyu Ghuge.
The case of the petitioner is not proved.
Hence, it is ordered:
ORDER
The action of management of Telecom, through its District Manager (Telecom), BSNL, Parbhani,
Nagpur and the Chief General Manager, Telecom, BSNL, 8th Floor, Foundation Building, Mumbai-I, in
terminating the services of Shri Bhimrao Abhimanyu Ghuge, C/o E.N.Govindpure, Bhoipura, Hingoli, Tehsil :
Hingoli, Dist. Parbhani – 431513, is legal, proper & justified. The workman is not entitled to any relief.
Justice (Retd.) SHIV SHANKER PRASAD, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 418.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (a1947 dk 14 ) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
न्यूजक्त्लयर पावर कॉरपोरेिन ऑफ इंजडया जलजमटेड ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa
fufnZ’V औद्योजगक fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;
ds iapkV (a50/2021) izdkf'kr
djrh gSA
[सं. एल-42011/41/2021-आईआर(बी-I )]
सलोनी, उप जनिेिक
New Delhi, the 10th March, 2025
S.O. 418.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government
hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 50/2021) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Jaipur as shown in the
Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited and their
workmen.
[No. L-42011/41/2021-IR(B-I)]
SALONI, Dy. Director
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1147
ihBklhu vf/kdkjh
jk/kk eksgu prqosZnh
lh-th-vkbZ-Vh- izdj.k la- 50@2021
Reference No. L-42011/41/2021-IR (DU) Dated: 12.08.2021
egkea=h] jktLFkku ,Vksfed ikoj Jfed la?k] ¼Hkkel½] jkorHkkVk] ¼jktLFkku½ 323305A
------izkFkhZ
1- lkbZV Mk;jsDVj] U;wfDy;j ikoj dkjiksjs'ku vkWQ bf.M;k fyfe- jkorHkkVk jktLFkku lkbZV] bdkbZ 1 ls 8 iksLV
v.kq'kkfDr& 323303 ok;k dksVk ftyk& fpRrksMx<+] ¼jktLFkku½
-----vizkFkhZx.k@foi{kh
mifLFkr%&
izkFkhZ dh rjQ ls % dksbZ mifLFkr ughaA
vizkFkhZ dh rjQ ls % dksbZ mifLFkr ughaA
1- Je ea=ky; Hkkjr ljdkj ubZ fnYyh }kjk fnukad 12-08-2021 dks vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 dh /kkjk 10
¼1½ ¼Mh½ o 2A ds vUrxZr iznRr 'kfDr;ks ds vuqlj.k esa fuEukafdr vkS|ksfxd fookn U;k; fu.kZ;u gsrq bl
vf/kdj.k dks lanfHkZr fd;k x;k %&
“
”
2- Je ea=ky; }kjk ;g fookn fnukad 12-08-2021 dks iathd`r Mkd }kjk bl vf/kdj.k ds lkFk lkFk fookn ds
i{kdkjksa ;Fkk izkFkhZ laxBu o foi{khx.k dks Hkh izsf"kr fd;k x;k FkkA ;g fookn fnukad 01-09-2021 dks bl
vf/kdj.k esa izkIr gqvk&rFkk i{kdkjksa dh milatkfr o vfHkopuksa dh izrh{kk esa vc rd yafcr jgk gSA vkt
fnukad 09-10-2024 rd Hkh bl lanfHkZr fookn ds vxzlj.k gsrq izkFkhZ us vius nkos dk vfHkdFku izLrqr ugha fd;k
gSA Je ea=ky; }kjk lanfHkZr fookn ds laca/k esa fookn izLrqr djus okys i{kdkj ¼izkFkhZ½ dks ;g funsZ'k fn;k x;k
gS fd og mDr vkns’k dh izkfIr ds 15 fnu dh vof/k esa vius nkos dk vfHkdFku bl vf/kdj.k ds le{k izLrqr
djsA pwfda izkFkhZ dks ;g vkns'k iathd`r Mkd ds ek/;e ls izsf"kr fd;k x;k gS] ;g mi/kkfjr fd;k tkuk furkar
U;k;ksfpr gS fd& ftl izdkj bl vf/kdj.k dks lanfHkZr vkns'k 01-09-2018 dks izkIr gks pqdk gS& izkFkhZ dks Hkh
;g vkns’k izkIr gks pqdk gksxkA
3- bl rF;kRed ifjn`’; esa bl vf/kdj.k dk ;g lqfopkfjr vf/ker gS fd izkFkhZ o foi{khx.k ds e/; lanfHkZr
fookn ds vxzlj.k gsrq izkFkhZ&i{k vfuPNqd o mnklhu gSA blfy, nkos ds vfHkdFku ds vHkko esa izkFkhZ lanfHkZr
fookn esa dksbZ vuqrks"k ikus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA
4- lanfHkZr fookn dk fuLrkj.k blh izdkj fd;k tkrk gSA
5- vf/kfu.kZ; dh izfrfyfi vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 dh /kkjk 17 ¼1½ ds vuqlj.k esa izdk'kukFkZ izsf"kr
dh tkosaA
jk/kkeksgu prqosZnh] ihBklhu vf/kdkjh
1148
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
नई दिल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 419.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 (a1947 dk 14 ) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;
ljdkj रािस्ट्थान परमाणु जवद्युत स्ट्टेिन इकाई ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa
fufnZ’V औद्योजगक fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;
ds iapkV (a15/2014) izdkf'kr
djrh gSA
[सं. एल-42011/133/2013-आईआर(बी-I)]
सलोनी, उप जनिेिक
New Delhi, the 10th March, 2025
S.O. 419.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 15/2014) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Rajasthan Atomatic
Power Station Unit and their workmen.
[No L-42011/133/2013-IR(B-I)]
SALONI, Dy. Director
ihBklhu vf/kdkjh
jk/kk eksgu prqosZnh
lh-th-vkbZ-Vh- izdj.k la- 15@2014
Reference No. L-42011/133/2013-IR (DU) Dated: 06.03.2014
jktLFkku ,VkWfed ikoj Jfed la?k] Hkkjrh; etnwj la?k vkWfQl] v.kqfdj.k dkWyksuh] iksLV& HkkHkkuxj] jkorHkkVk] dksVk
}kjk tujy lsdzsVjh Jh fueZy tSuA
------izkFkhZ
2-
LFky
funs'kd] jktLFkku ,VkWfed ikoj LVs'ku ;wfuV] vkj-vkj- lkbZV jkorHkkVk dksVkA
------vizkFkhZx.k@foi{kh
mifLFkr%&
izkFkhZ dh rjQ ls % dksbZ mifLFkr ughaA
vizkFkhZ dh rjQ ls % lkxjey pkSgku] ,MoksdsV
¼Jh /kesZUnz tSu] vfHkHkk"kd dh vksj ls½
2- Je ea=ky; Hkkjr ljdkj ubZ fnYyh }kjk fnukad 06-03-2014 dks vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 dh /kkjk 10
¼1½ ¼Mh½ o 2A ds vUrxZr iznRr 'kfDr;ks ds vuqlj.k esa fuEukafdr vkS|ksfxd fookn U;k; fu.kZ;u gsrq bl
vf/kdj.k dks lanfHkZr fd;k x;k %&
2- fnukad 24-11-2014 dks izkFkhZ dh vksj ls vaxzsth Hkk"kk esa nkos dk vfHkdFku izLrqr fd;k x;kA ftlds laf{kIr
vuqfnr rF; bl izdkj gS%&
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1149
3- izkFkhZ ,d iathd`r VsªM ;wfu;u gSA izkFkhZ laxBu ds lnL;ksa us U;wfDyh;j ikoj dksjiksj'ku vkWQ bafM;k ds
foKkiu ds varxZr ,l-Vh- vkWijsVj ds in ds fy;s vkosnu fd;k FkkA foKkiu esa ,l-Vh- vkWijsVj&ch- dks
3200&85&4900 vkSj ,l-Vh- vkWijsVj&lh- dks 4600&100&6000 dk osrueku fn;k tkuk n’kkZ;k x;k FkkA laxBu
ds lnL;ksa dks fyf[kr ijh{kk esa cSBus gsrq ,d i= izkIr gqvk] ftlds ckn lk{kkRdkj Hkh fy;k tkuk FkkA ,d
izkFkhZ jtuh'k dqekj dk i= vusDpj&2 layXu gSa blds Ik’pkr vkosnudrkZvksa dks fnukad 24-12-2005 dks lwfpr
fd;k x;k fd mUgsa ,l-Vh- @VsªMlesu ds in ij p;u dj fy;k x;k gS vkSj os vius nLrkost izLrqr djsaA
izkFkhZx.k dks foi{kh ds i= }kjk lwfpr dh xbZ 'krsZ Lohdkj FkhA blfy;s mUgksaus vuqca/k i= vkSj baMsefuVh ckWUM+
HkjsA 2 o"kZ dk izf’k{k.k lekIr gksus ij LFky funs’kd us izf'k{k.kkfFkZ;ksa ds dk;Z dk ijh{k.k fd;k rnqijkar
82 izf'k{kqvksa dks ftUgksaus 80 izfr'kr ;k mlls vf/kd vad izkIr fd;s Fks] VªsMlesu&ch- ds osrueku fn;s tkus dh
flQkfj'k dhA iz'kf{kqvksa us VsªMlesu&ch ds LFkku ij VªsMlesau&lh- ds osrueku fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
ysfdu ml ij dksbZ /;ku ugha fn;k x;kA 80 LVkbZisUM ikus okys Vsªuh] VªsMlesu&lh- dk osrueku]
4000&100&6000 fnukad 03-04-2008 ls ikus ds vf/kdkjh gSA bu izf'k{k.kkfFkZ;ksa dks VªsMlesu&ch- ds in ij
fu;qDr fd;k tkuk vfof/k iw.kZ gSA vr% okn Lohdkj dj 80 izf’k{k.kkfFkZ;ksa dks VªsMlesu&lh- ds in ij fu;qDr
fd;k tkos vkSj mUgsa ns; osru dk varj Hkh fnyk;k tkosA
4- fnukad 01-02-2021 dks foi{kh dh vksj ls vaxzsth Hkk"kk esa izLrqr oknksRrj ds laf{kIr rF; bl izdkj gS%&
5- nkos ds iSjk la[;k 2 ls 8 rd ds rF; Lohdkj ugha gSA izf’k{k.kkfFkZ;ksa dks 2008 esa N.P.C.I.L. esa ,CtkcZ fd;k
x;k FkkA u;s fn’kk funsZ’kksa ds vuqlkj iqjkus vkns’kksa dks vfr yaf?kr dj fn;k x;k FkkA u;s fn’kk funsZ’kksa ds
vuqlkj izf’k{k.k dks lQyrk iwoZd iw.kZ dj ysus ij mUgsa VªsMlesu&ch- dks ns; osrueku ds U;wure ij j[kk tkuk
FkkA izf’k{kqvksa ds }kjk izkIr fd;s vadks ds vk/kkj ij os vfxze osru o`f} izkIr dj jgs FksA pwafd nkokdrkZvksa us
fufoZjks/k fu;qfDr;ksa dks Lohdkj dj fy;k Fkk blfy;s vc os fu;qfDr;ksa dks pqukSrh nsus ls focaf/kr gSA nkokdrkZ
4000&100&6000 ds osrueku esa osru ikus ds vf/kdkjh ugha gSA foi{khx.k us dHkh Hkh nkokdrkZvksa dks
VsªMlesu&lh- ds in nsus dk opu ugha fn;k FkkA nkokdrkZ dksbZ vuqrks"k ikus ds vf/kdkjh ugha gSA vr% nkok
fujLr fd;k tkosA
6- fnukad 27-12-2021 dks izkFkhZ&i{k us oknksRrj ds rF;ksa dk [k.Mu djrs gq;s vfrfjDr dFku izLrqr fd;sA
7- fnukad 01-08-2022 dks izkFkhZx.k us vius lk{; esa c`ts'k iar] jtuh’k dqekj rFkk dSyk’k pUnz vejkor ds 'kiFk
i= izLrqr fd;sA ml fnu foi{kh ds vfHkHkk"kd us lk{khx.k ls izfrijh{kk djus dk volj pkgk] tks iznku dj
fn;k x;kA fnukad 26-12-2023 rd izkFkhZ ds lk{khx.k izfrijh{kk gsrq mifLFkr ugha gq;s] blfy;s izkFkhZ dh lk{;
gsrq vafre volj nsrs gq;s fnukad 06-05-2024 fu;r dh xbZ] fdarq ml fnu Hkh izkFkhZ i{k ds lk{kh mifLFkr ugha
gq;sA foi{kh dh vukifRr dks ns[krs gq;s vafre volj dks fnukad 03-09-2024 rd c<k;k x;k fdarq 03-09-2024
dks Hkh izkFkhZ i{k dh vksj ls dksbZ Hkh mifLFkr ugha gqvkA blfy;s foxr fn;s x;s voljksa ,oa izkFkhZ i{k dh
mnklhurk dks ns[krs gq;s izkFkhZ dh lk{; dk volj lekIr dj fn;k x;kA foi{kh us Hkh dksbZ lk{; izLrqr ugha
djuk pkgkA
8- fnukad 20-09-2024 dks izkFkhZ i{k iqu% vuqifLFkr jgkA vfHkHkk"kd foi{kh us ;g dgk gS fd pwafd izkFkhZ us vius
dFkuksa ds leFkZu esa dksbZ lk{; izLrqr ugha fd;k gS blfy;s izkFkhZ dks dksbZ vuqrks"k fn;k tkuk laHko ugha gSA
9- eSaus miyC/k rF;ksa ij fopkj fd;kA pawfd izkFkhZ i{k us vius nkos ds leFkZu esa dksbZ lk{; izLrqr ugha fd;k gS
blfy;s izkFkhZ laxBu ;g izekf.kr ugha dj ldk gS fd foi{kh }kjk jktLFkku ijek.kq fo|qr fctyh ?kj bdkbZ 5
o 6 ds cSp la[;k&2 ds 80 rduhf'k;uksa dks fu;qfDr ds le; nh xbZ xzsfMax esa HksnHkko fd;s tkus dh dk;Zokgh
voS/k ,oa vuqfpr gksA izkFkhZ lk{; ds vHkko esa dksbZ vuqrks"k izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA
10- izLrqr fd;s x;s fookn dk U;k;fu.kZ;u blh izdkj fd;k tkrk gSA
11- vf/kfu.kZ; dh izfrfyfi vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 dh /kkjk 17 ¼1½ ds vuqlj.k esa izdk'kukFkZ izsf"kr dh
tkosA
12- U;k;ky; }kjk vf/kfu.kZ; vkt fnukad 07-10-2024 dks lquk;k x;kA
jk/kkeksgu prqosZnh] ihBklhu vf/kdkjh
नई दिल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 420.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्रीय
सरकार डाक अिीक्षक, भुसावल उपमंडल, भुसावल- (एम.एस.), के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री राहुल लीलािर
सपकाले, कामगार, के बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केंरीय सरकार औद्योजगक न्यायाजिकरण-सि-श्रम न्यायालय, नागपुर, पंर्ाट
1150
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(संिभच संख्या (Case No.CGIT/NGP/07/2020-21) को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै,प्रकाजित करती िै िो
केन्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 10.03.2025को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-42025-07-2025-आईआर(डीयू)-47]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 10th March, 2025
S.O. 420.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Case No.CGIT/NGP/07/2020-21) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court, Nagpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers
in relation to The Superintendent of Posts, Bhusawal Sub Division, Bhusawal- (M.S.),and Shri Rahul Liladhar
Sapkale, Worker, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 10.03.2025.
[No. L-42025-07-2025-IR(DU)-47]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI SHIV SHANKER PRASAD PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR
COURT, NAGPUR
Case No.CGIT/NGP/07/2020-21
Date: 07.02.2025.
Party No. 1:
Shri Rahul Liladhar Sapkale
Gajanan Maharaj Nagar, Manak Bag,
Bhusawal, Distt. Jalgaon-425201 (M.S.)
V/s.
Party No. 2:
The Superintendent of Posts,
Bhusawal Sub Division,
Modern Road, 2th Floor,
Bhusawal Head Post Office Building,
Bhusawal-425201 (M.S.)
AWARD
(Dated: 7th February, 2025)
In exercise of the powers conferred by Section (1) & (2) of Section 2-A of Industrial Disputes (Amendment)
Act, 2010("the Act" in short), the applicant filed an industrial dispute between the employers, in relation to the
managenet of The Superintendent of Posts and the applicant, Shri Rahul Liladhar Sapkale for adjudication, vide case
no. CGIT/NGP/Appln/07/2020-2021, with the following issues framed:
1. “Whether the applicant Shri Rahul Liladhar Sapkale is workman.
2. Whether there is any relationship of employer and employee between the parties.
3. Whether the action of the managenet/Post Office in termination the workman is legal, fair and
justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ?”
2. Case called out. Both the parties are absent. Both the parties are not attending the Court since 13/09/2021.
Although statement of clain and written statement have been filed by the parties but no one is present today to
establish their say/claim. No evidence has been adduced by the petitioner. The contents of the statement of claim are
not proved.
3. Both the parties are not coming since long shows that both the partiesare not interested to contest the case.
The case of the petitioner is not proved.
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1151
Hence, it is ordered:
ORDER
The action of the management/Post Office in terminating Shri Rahul Liladhar Sapkale is legal, fair
and justified. Shri Rahul Liladhar Sapkale is not entitled to any relief.
Justice (Retd.) SHIV SHANKER PRASAD, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 421.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्रीय
सरकार समूि मिाप्रबंिक, राष्ट्रीय थमचल पावर कंपनी जलजमटेड, मौिा- नागपुर; प्रबंि जनिेिक/मिाप्रबंिक,
आई.वी.आर.सी.एल. जलजमटेड, ठेकेिार, मौिा-नागपुर, के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और अध्यक्ष, मौिा जवि प्रकल्प
मििूर संघ, पारजसवनी, नागपुर, के बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केंरीय सरकार औद्योजगक न्यायाजिकरण-सि-श्रम न्यायालय,
नागपुर, पंर्ाट (संिभच संख्या (Case.No.CGIT/NGP/12/2019-20) को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया
िै,प्रकाजित करती िै िो केन्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 10.03.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-42025-07-2025-आईआर(डीयू)-48]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 10th March, 2025
S.O. 421.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Case No.CGIT/NGP/12/2019-20) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court, Nagpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers
in relation to The Group General Manager, National Thermal Power Company Ltd, Mouda–Nagpur ;The
Managing Director/General Manager, I.V.R.C.L. Ltd, Contractor, Mauda- Nagpur, and The President,
Mouda Vij Prakalp Mazdoor Sangh, Parseoni, Nagpur, which was received along with soft copy of the award by
the Central Government on 10.03.2025.
[No. L-42025-07-2025-IR(DU)-48]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI SHIV SHANKER PRASAD PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR
COURT, NAGPUR
Case No.CGIT/NGP/Appln./12/2019-20
Date: 30.01.2025.
Party No. 1:
The President,
Mouda Vij Prakalp Mazdoor Sangh,
House of Shri Prem Rodekar, Tarsa Road,
Kanhan, Tah. Parseoni, Distt. Nagpur – 441404.
V/s.
Party No. 2:
The Group General Manager,
National Thermal Power Company Ltd,
At. Tah. & Post: Mouda, Distt. – Nagpur – 441404.
The Managing Director/General Manager,
I.V.R.C.L. Ltd., Contractor,
NTPC Mouda, Post & Tah. Mouda, Distt. Nagpur-441104.
AWARD
1152
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(Dated: 30th January, 2025)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial
dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of National Thermal Power Company Ltd., Mouda,
Distt-Nagpur (Principal Employer) I.V.R.C.L. (Contractor) and their workman, Smt. Nirasha Devidar Bhoyar & Smt.
Nanda Rajesh Maladhare for adjudication, as per letter No. N-8(03)/2020-ID/IR dated 27.02.2020, with the
following schedule:-
“Whether the action of management National Thermal Power Company Ltd., Mouda, Distt-Nagpur
(Principal Employer) Iragavarapu Venkata Reddy Construction Limited (Contractor) in terminating
the Service of Smt. Nirasha Devidas Bhoyar & Smt. Nanda Rajesh Maladhare w.e.f. 29/06/2017 is
legal, just and proper? If not, to what relief the workman Smt, Nirasha Devidas Bhoyar & Smt. Nanda
Rajesh Maladhare is entitled to?”
2.
Case called out. Counsel for the management is present and filed an application for dismissal of the case.
Petitioner is absent on repeated calls. Petitioner is not attending the Court since 28/04/2020 i.e. near about 5 years. On
receipt of the reference, parties were noticed to file their respective statement of claim and written statement. The
reference notification no. N-8(03)/2020-ID/IR dated 27.02.2020 has been received and has registered vide case no.
CGIT/NGP/Appln./12/2019-20. The dispute has been raised by the workman. The Government has already directed
the parties for raising the dispute and to file a statement of claim with relevant documents, list of reliance and
witnesses within 15 days of the receipt of the order or reference and also to forward the copies of the said statement to
which one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute. But from the date of registration of reference in this Court
petitioner did not turn up to prove his case. No statement of claim and written statement have been filed by the parties
till date. The petitioner has not adduced any evidence to support his claim.
3.
As the petitioner is not coming since long shows that petitioner is not interested to contest the case and do
not want to proceed with the reference, so it is closed.
The case of the petitioner is not proved and answered in negative.
Hence, it is ordered:
ORDER
The action of management National Thermal Power Company Ltd., Mouda, Distt-Nagpur (Principal
Employer) Iragavarapu Venkata Reddy Construction Limited (Contractor) in terminating the Service of Smt.
Nirasha Devidas Bhoyar & Smt. Nanda Rajesh Maladhare w.e.f. 29/06/2017 is legal, just and proper. The
workman is not entitled to any relief.
Justice (Retd.) SHIV SHANKER PRASAD, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 422.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्रीय
सरकार प्रबंिक (एर्.आर.) जत्रनेवा इन्फ्रा प्रोिेक्त््स प्राइवेट जलजमटेड, वैगांव (जनपानी), विाच; आर.पी.पी. इन्फ्रा प्रोिेक्त््स
प्राइवेट जलजमटेड, पंिीकृत कायाचलय, पांडुररया इरोड, तजमलनाडु, के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री भगवान,
कामगार,के बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केंरीय सरकार औद्योजगक न्यायाजिकरण-सि-श्रम न्यायालय, नागपुर,पंर्ाट(संिभच
संख्या (Case No. CGIT/NGP/09/2020-21) को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै, प्रकाजित करती िै िो
केन्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 10.03.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-42025-07-2025-आईआर(डीयू)-49]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 10th March, 2025
S.O. 422.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Case No.CGIT/NGP/09/2020-21) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court, Nagpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers
in relation to The Manager (H.R) Trineva Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. Waigaon (Nipani) , Wardha ; R.P.P. Infra
Projects Pvt. Ltd. registered office, Panduria ERODE, Tamilnadu, and Shri Bhagwan, Worker, which was
received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 10.03.2025.
[No. L-42025-07-2025-IR(DU)-49]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1153
BEFORE SHRI SHIV SHANKER PRASAD PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR
COURT, NAGPUR
Case No.CGIT/NGP/Appln/09/2020-21
Date: 07.02.2025.
Party No. 1:
Bhagwan S/o Ishwarji Moon aged about
46 years, Occ.Nil, R/o at Neri (Mirzapur),
Po. Waigaon (Nipani), Tah. & Distt. Wardha.
V/s.
Party No. 2:
1) The Manager (H.R) Trineva Infra Projects Pvt.
Ltd. at Neri Camp Wardha Po. Waigaon (Nipani)
Tah. & distt. Wardha.
2) R.P.P. Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. registered office
at S.F.No. 454, Raghumathya Naiken Polayan
Railway Colony, Po. Panduria ERODE,
Tamilnadu - 638002
AWARD
(Dated: 07th February, 2025)
In exercise of the powers conferred by Section (1) & (2) of Section 2-A of Industrial Disputes (Amendment)
Act, 2010 (“the Act” in short), the applicant filed an industrial dispute between the employers, in relation to the
management of Infra Project Pvt. Ltd. and the applicant, Shri. Bhagwan Ishwarji Moon for adjudication, vide case no.
CGIT/NGP/Appln/09/2020-2021, with the following issues framed:-
1) Whether Shri. Bhagwan S/o Ishwarji Moon is workman?
2) Whether there is any relationship of employer and employee between the parties.
3) Whether the action of the management/ Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. in terminating the workman is legal, fair
and justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?
2.
Case called out. Both the parties are absent. Though statement of claim is filed but no written statement has
been filed by the management till date. Petitioner as well as respondents is not attending the Court since very
beginning. No other evidence has been filed by the petitioner to establish his statement of claim.
3.
As the petitioner is not coming since long shows that petitioner is not interested to contest the case and do
not want to proceed with the case, so it is closed.
The case of the petitioner is not proved.
Hence, it is ordered:
ORDER
The action of the management/ Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. in terminating the Shri. Bhagwan Ishwarji
Moon is legal, fair and justified. Shri. Bhagwan Ishwarji Moon is not entitled to any relief.
Justice (Retd.) SHIV SHANKER PRASAD, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 423.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्रीय
सरकार समूि मिाप्रबंिक, राष्ट्रीय थमचल पावर कंपनी जलजमटेड, मौिा- नागपुर; प्रबंि जनिेिक/मिाप्रबंिक,
आई.वी.आर.सी.एल. जलजमटेड, ठेकेिार, मौिा-नागपुर, के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और अध्यक्ष, मौिा जवि प्रकल्प
मििूर संघ, पारजसवनी, नागपुर, के बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केंरीय सरकार औद्योजगक न्यायाजिकरण-सि-श्रम न्यायालय,
1154
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
नागपुर,पंर्ाट(संिभच संख्या (Case.No.CGIT/NGP/13/2019-20) को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै, प्रकाजित
करती िै िो केन्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 10.03.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-42025-07-2025-आईआर(डीयू)-52]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 10th March, 2025
S.O. 423.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Case No.CGIT/NGP/13/2019-20) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court, Nagpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers
in relation to The Group General Manager, National Thermal Power Company Ltd, Mouda–Nagpur ;The
Managing Director/General Manager, I.V.R.C.L. Ltd, Contractor, Mauda- Nagpur, and The President,
Mouda Vij Prakalp Mazdoor Sangh, Parseoni, Nagpur, which was received along with soft copy of the award by
the Central Government on 10.03.2025.
[No. L-42025-07-2025-IR(DU)-52]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI SHIV SHANKER PRASAD PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR
COURT, NAGPUR
Case No.CGIT/NGP/Appln./13/2019-20
Date: 30.01.2025.
Party No.1:
The President,
Mouda Vij Prakalp Mazdoor Sangh,
House of Shri Prem Rodekar, Tarsa Road,
Kanhan, Tah. Parseoni, Distt. Nagpur – 441404.
V/s.
Party No.2:
The Group General Manager,
National Thermal Power Company Ltd,
At. Tah. & Post: Mouda, Distt. – Nagpur – 441404.
The Managing Director/General Manager,
I.V.R.C.L. Ltd., Contractor,
NTPC Mouda, Post & Tah. Mouda, Distt. Nagpur-441104.
AWARD
(Dated: 30th January, 2025)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial
dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of National Thermal Power Company Ltd., Mouda,
Distt-Nagar (Principal Employer) I.V.R.C.L. (Contractor) and their workman, Shri Dnyaneshwar Motiram Patiye for
adjudication, as per letter No. N-8(02)/2020-ID/IR dated 27.02.2020, with the following schedule:-
“Whether the action of management National Thermal Power Company Ltd., Mouda, Distt-Nagpur
(Principal Employer) Iragavarapu Venkata Reddy Construction Limited (Contractor) in terminating
the Service Shri Dnyaneshwar Motiram Patiye w.e.f. 03/03/2017 is legal, just and proper? If not, to
what relief the workman Shri Dnyaneshwar Motiram Patiye is entitled to?”
2.
Case called out. Counsel for the management is present and filed an application for dismissal of the case.
Petitioner is absent on repeated calls. Petitioner is not attending the Court since 28/04/2020 i.e. near about 5 years. On
receipt of the reference, parties were noticed to file their respective statement of claim and written statement. The
reference notification no. N-8(02)/2020-ID/IR dated 27.02.2020 has been received and has registered vide case no.
CGIT/NGP/Appln./11/2019-20. The dispute has been raised by the workman. The Government has already directed
the parties for raising the dispute and to file a statement of claim with relevant documents, list of reliance and
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1155
witnesses within 15 days of the receipt of the order or reference and also to forward the copies of the said statement to
which one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute. But from the date of registration of reference in this Court
petitioner did not turn up to prove his case. No statement of claim and written statement have been filed by the parties
till date.
3.
As the petitioner is not coming since long shows that petitioner is not interested to contest the case and do
not want to proceed with the reference, so it is closed.
The case of the petitioner is not proved.
Hence, it is ordered:
ORDER
The action of management National Thermal Power Company Ltd., Mouda, Distt-Nagpur (Principal
Employer) Iragavarapu Venkata Reddy Construction Limited (Contractor) in terminating the Service Shri
Dnyaneshwar Motiram Patiye w.e.f. 03/04/2019 is legal, just and proper. The workman is not entitled to any
relief.
Justice (Retd.) SHIV SHANKER PRASAD, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 424.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्रीय
सरकार समूि मिाप्रबंिक, राष्ट्रीय थमचल पावर कंपनी जलजमटेड, मौिा- नागपुर; प्रबंि जनिेिक/मिाप्रबंिक,
आई.वी.आर.सी.एल. जलजमटेड, ठेकेिार, मौिा-नागपुर, के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और अध्यक्ष, मौिा जवि प्रकल्प
मििूर संघ, पारजसवनी, नागपुर, के बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केंरीय सरकार औद्योजगक न्यायाजिकरण-सि-श्रम न्यायालय,
नागपुर,पंर्ाट(संिभच संख्या (Case.No.CGIT/NGP/10/2019-20) को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै,प्रकाजित
करती िै िो केन्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 10.03.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-42025-07-2025-आईआर(डीयू)-53]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 10th March, 2025
S.O. 424.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Case No.CGIT/NGP/10/2019-20) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court, Nagpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers
in relation to The Group General Manager, National Thermal Power Company Ltd, Mouda–Nagpur ;The
Managing Director/General Manager, I.V.R.C.L. Ltd, Contractor, Mauda- Nagpur, and The President,
Mouda Vij Prakalp Mazdoor Sangh, Parseoni, Nagpur, which was received along with soft copy of the award by
the Central Government on 10.03.2025.
[No. L-42025-07-2025-IR(DU)-53]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI SHIV SHANKER PRASAD PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR
COURT, NAGPUR
Case No.CGIT/NGP/Appln./10/2019-20
Date: 30.01.2025.
Party No. 1:
The President,
Mouda Vij Prakalp Mazdoor Sangh,
House of Shri Prem Rodekar, Tarsa Road,
Kanhan, Tah. Parseoni, Distt. Nagpur – 441404.
V/s.
Party No.2:
The Group General Manager,
1156
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
National Thermal Power Company Ltd,
At. Tah. & Post: Mouda, Distt. – Nagpur – 441404.
The Managing Director/General Manager,
I.V.R.C.L. Ltd., Contractor,
NTPC Mouda, Post & Tah. Mouda, Distt. Nagpur-441104.
AWARD
(Dated: 30th January, 2025)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial
dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of National Thermal Power Company Ltd., Mouda,
Distt-Nagar (Principal Employer) I.V.R.C.L. (Contractor) and their workman, Shri Dnyaneshwar Motiram Patiye for
adjudication, as per letter No. N-8(02)/2020-ID/IR dated 27.02.2020, with the following schedule:-
“Whether the action of management National Thermal Power Company Ltd., Mouda, Distt-Nagpur
(Principal Employer) Iragavarapu Venkata Reddy Construction Limited (Contractor) in terminating
the Service Shri Dnyaneshwar Motiram Patiye w.e.f. 03/03/2017 is legal, just and proper? If not, to
what relief the workman Shri Dnyaneshwar Motiram Patiye is entitled to?”
2.
Case called out. Counsel for the management is present and filed an application for dismissal of the case.
Petitioner is absent on repeated calls. Petitioner is not attending the Court since 28/04/2020 i.e. near about 5 years. On
receipt of the reference, parties were noticed to file their respective statement of claim and written statement. The
reference notification no. N-8(02)/2020-ID/IR dated 27.02.2020 has been received and has registered vide case no.
CGIT/NGP/Appln./11/2019-20. The dispute has been raised by the workman. The Government has already directed
the parties for raising the dispute and to file a statement of claim with relevant documents, list of reliance and
witnesses within 15 days of the receipt of the order or reference and also to forward the copies of the said statement to
which one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute. But from the date of registration of reference in this Court
petitioner did not turn up to prove his case. No statement of claim and written statement have been filed by the parties
till date.
3.
As the petitioner is not coming since long shows that petitioner is not interested to contest the case and do
not want to proceed with the reference, so it is closed.
The case of the petitioner is not proved.
Hence, it is ordered:
ORDER
The action of management National Thermal Power Company Ltd., Mouda, Distt-Nagpur (Principal
Employer) Iragavarapu Venkata Reddy Construction Limited (Contractor) in terminating the Service Shri
Dnyaneshwar Motiram Patiye w.e.f. 03/03/2017 is legal, just and proper. The workman is not entitled to any
relief.
Justice (Retd.) SHIV SHANKER PRASAD, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 425.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्रीय
सरकार उपमंडल अजिकारी, भारत संर्ार जनगम जलजमटेड, मेिकर, बुलढाणा- (एमएस), के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों
और श्री संिय गोववंिा र्व्िाण एवं 4 अन्य, कामगार,के बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केंरीय सरकार औद्योजगक न्यायाजिकरण-
सि-श्रम न्यायालय, नागपुर, पंर्ाट (संिभच संख्या (Case No.CGIT/NGP/53/2015-16) को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में
दिखाया गया िै, प्रकाजित करती िै िो केन्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 10.03.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-40012/04/2016-आईआर(डीयू)]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 10th March, 2025
S.O. 425.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1157
Government hereby publishes the award (Case No.CGIT/NGP/53/2015-16) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court, Nagpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers
in relation to The Sub Divisional Officer, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Mehkar, Buldhana- (M.S.), and Shri
Sanjay Govinda Chavan & 4 others, Worker, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central
Government on 10.03.2025.
[No. L-40012/04/20216IR(DU)]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI SHIV SHANKER PRASAD PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR
COURT, NAGPUR
Case No.CGIT/NGP/53/2015-16
Date: 27.01.2025.
Party No.1:
The Sub Divisional Officer,
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited,
Mehkar, Buldhana (M.S.)-443301
V/s.
Party No.2:
Shri Sanjay Govinda Chavan & 4 others,
BSNL, Mehkar,
Buldhana (M.S.)-443301
AWARD
(Dated: 27th January, 2025)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial
dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., Mehkar, Dist-Buldhana
and their workman, Shri S.G. Chanvan, Sh. Vishal Navghare, S.G. Mule & Nitin Bhimrao Ambhore for adjudication,
as per letter No.L-40012/04/2016 (IR(DU)) dated 07.03.2016, with the following schedule:-
“Whether the action of the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., Mehkar, Dist-Buldhana in
terminating Sh. S.G. Chanvan, Sh. Vishal Navghare, S.G. Mule & Nitin Bhimrao Ambhore are just fair &
legal? If not to what relief the concerned workmen are entitled to ?”
2.
Case called out. Counsels for both the parties are absent. Petitioner is not attending the Court since
12/03/2020 i.e. near about 5 years. Although, petitioner has filed his statement of claim and written statement has also
been filed by the respondent. Petitioner has filed his evidence on affidavit dated 26/07/2018 but petitioner is not
present to prove his case which is contended in the statement of claim. No other evidence is adduced by the petitioner
to establish his case.
3.
As the petitioner is not coming since long shows that petitioner is not interested to contest the case and did
not want to proceed with the reference, so it is closed.
The case of the petitioner is not proved.
Hence, it is ordered:
ORDER
The action of the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., Mehkar, Dist-Buldhana in terminating
Sh. S.G. Chanvan, Sh. Vishal Navghare, S.G. Mule & Nitin Bhimrao Ambhore are just fair & legal. The above
workmen are not entitled to any relief.
Justice (Retd.) SHIV SHANKER PRASAD, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 426.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्रीय
सरकार जनिेिक, सीआईएसआर, राष्ट्रीय पयाचवरण इंिीजनयररंग अनुसंिान ,नागपुर; श्री भीमराव म्िैसकर, मेससच ब्लैक
बेल्ट मल्टी सॉल्यूिन प्राइवेट जलजमटेड, लक्ष्मी नगर, नागपुर, के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और मिासजर्व, नीरी कंत्रजत
1158
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
कामगार संघ, (बीएमएस), सीताबडी, नागपुर, के बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केंरीय सरकार औद्योजगक न्यायाजिकरण-सि-
श्रम न्यायालय, नागपुर,पंर्ाट(संिभच संख्या (Case No.CGIT/NGP/69/2018-19) को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया
गया िै, प्रकाजित करती िै िो केन्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 10.03.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-42011/138/2018-आईआर(डीयू)]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 10th March, 2025
S.O. 426—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Case No.CGIT/NGP/69/2018-19) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court, Nagpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers
in relation to The Director, CISR, National Environmental Engineering Research, Nagpur; Shri Bhimrao
Mhaiskar, M/s. Black Belt Multi Solution Pvt. Ltd.,Laxmi Nagar, Nagpur, and The General Secretary, NEERI
Kantrati Kamgar Sangh, (BMS), Sitabuldi, Nagpur, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the
Central Government on 10.03.2025.
[No. L-42011/138/2018-IR(DU)]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI SHIV SHANKER PRASAD PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR
COURT, NAGPUR
Case No.CGIT/NGP/69/2018-19
Date: 31.01.2025.
Party No. 1:
1) The Director, CISR
National Environmental Engineering Research
Institute, Nehru Marg, Wardha Road,
Nagpur-440020
2) Sh. Bhimrao Mhaiskar,
M/s. Black Belt Multi Solution Pvt. Ltd.
Contractor, 280, Liberty Tower Apertment,
Laxmi Nagar, Nagpur - 440022
V/s.
Party No. 2:
The General Secretary,
NEERI Kantrati Kamgar Sangh, (BMS)
B.M.S. Office, Behind Apna Bhandar, Mandir Marg,
Sitabuldi Nagpur - 440012
AWARD
(Dated: 31st January, 2025)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (“the Act” in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial
dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of CISR-National Enviromental Engineering Research
Institute, Nagpur and M/s Black Belt Multi Solution Pvt. Ltd. Contractor Nagpur and their workman, Shri.
Ramchandra Dehankar for adjudication, as per letter No. L-42011/138/2018 (IR(DU)) dated 02.01.2019, with the
following schedule:-
“Whether the action of the management of CISR – National Environment Engineering Research
Institute, Nagpur through Director and M/s Black Belt Multi Solution Pvt. Ltd. Contractor, Nagpur in
terminating the service of Sh. Ramchandra Dehankar is just fair & legal ? If not, to what relief the workman is
entitled to?”
2.
Case called out. Learned Counsel Ms. Vanshika Shulka holding for Shri Shantanu Ghate is present before
the Court on behalf of the respondent. None is present on behalf of the petitioner since 13/02/2020 i.e. near about five
years. No statement of claim has been filed by the petitioner and written statement is also not been filed by the
respondent till date. No evidence has been adduced by the petitioner in support of his say/claim.
3.
As the petitioner is not coming since long shows that petitioner is not interested to contest the case and do
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1159
not want to proceed with the reference, so it is closed.
The case of the petitioner is not proved.
Hence, it is ordered:
ORDER
The action of the management of CISR – National Environment Engineering Research Institute,
Nagpur through Director and M/s Black Belt Multi Solution Pvt. Ltd. Contractor, Nagpur in terminating the
service of Sh. Ramchandra Dehankar is just, fair & legal. The workman is not entitled to any relief.
Justice (Retd.) SHIV SHANKER PRASAD, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 427.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,केन्रीय
सरकार मिाप्रबंिक, बुरिानपुर ताप्ती जमल्स, लालबाग बुरिानपुर (म.प्र.), प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री िंकर
तेंिुलकर, कामगार, मिासजर्व, राष्ट्रीय जमल मििूर संघ (एटक), लालबाग, बुरिानपुर (म.प्र.), के बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट
केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण- सि- श्रम न्यायालय, िबलपुर पंर्ाट (संिभच संख्या आईडी नंबर सीिीआईटी/
एलसी/आर/ 47/2023), को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै, प्रकाजित करती िै िो केन्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉपी
के साथ 11.03.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-42011/117/2023-आईआर(डीयू)]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
New Delhi, the 11th March, 2025
S.O. 427.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. ID.No. CGIT/LC/R/47/2023), of the Central Government
Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the
employers in relation to The General Manager, Burhanpur Tapti Mills, Lalbagh Burhanpur- (M.P), and
Shri Shankar Kendulkar, Worker, The General Secretary, Rastriya Mills Mazdoor Sangh (Etak),Lalbagh,
Burhanpur (M.P), which was received along with soft copy of the award by the Central Government on 11.03.2025,
[No. L-42011/117/2023-IR(DU)]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/47/2023
Present: P.K.Srivastava
H.J.S..( Retd)
Shri Shankar Kendulkar
General Secretary
Rastriya Mills Mazdoor Sangh (Etak)
Lalbagh, Burhanpur (MP)-450331
Workman
Versus
General Manager
Burhanpur Tapti Mills, Lalbagh
Burhanpur (MP)-450331
Management
1160
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AWARD
(Passed on this 10th day of February-2025.)
As per letter dated 25/07/2023 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is
made to this Tribunal under section-10 of I.D. Act, 1947 as per reference number L-42011/117/2023/IR(DU) dt.
25/07/2023. The dispute under reference related to :-
“
”
INTUC
”
After registering the case on the basis of the reference, notices were sent to the parties and were duly served
on them. They appeared and filed their respective statements of claim and defense.
The case of the workman, in short, is that the workman union is a registered union bearing Registration No.
32, affiliated with Rashtriya Mazdoor Congress having affiliation no. 7218 and works for the welfare of workman of
the Burhanpur Tapti Mills. The raised a dispute before the Labour Commissioner Bhopal (C) by way of filing a
charter of demands on 02.04.2022. After failure of conciliation the reference was made to this Tribunal. The Union
has claimed that the workers in the Mill be held entitled to 100% wages from June 2020, the Mill be reopened and
they also be held entitled to the claims mentioned in the charter demand dated 02.04.2022.
Inspite of service of notice, none appeared for management, hence the case proceeded ex-parte against
management.
In evidence, the workman union has filed affidavits of its General Secretary and has proved documents, to
be referred to as and when required.
I have heard arguments of Learned Counsel Shri K.B. Singh for workman and have gone through the record
as well.
The Charter of Demands includes as many as eight demands. Demand No. 1 is that the Mill be restarted.
This is beyond the jurisdiction of this Tribunal. Demand No. 2 & 3 are with respect to payment of wages, which is not
cognizable by this Tribunal. There is separate authority in this respect under Payment of Wages Act 1936. Demand
No.4 with regard to bonus to which the workmen are entitled as per Section 8 of Payment of Bonus Act. Demand
No.5 in the Charter is with respect to regularization of daily wagers, which is vague in absence of details in affidavit
or any evidence in form of document, filed by workman union. Demand No.6 is with respect to enforcement of some
settlement between the union and management for which the workman union is at liberty to approach proper Forum.
Demand No. 7 & 8 are also with respect of payment of wages, which are covered under the Payment of Wages Act
1936.
On the basis of above discussion, the workman in the Mill are held entitled to payment of bonus as per
Section 8 of The Payment of Bonus Act, rest of the disputes are held not cognizable by this Tribunal. The
reference stands answered accordingly.
DATE: 10/02/2025
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 428.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनुसरण में,केन्रीय
सरकार मिाप्रबंिक, भारत सरकार टकसाल, मुंबई, के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोिकों और श्री सिानंि आर. पलांडे,
कामगार,के बीर् अनुबंि में जनर्िचष्ट केन्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजिकरण- सि-श्रम न्यायालय-1,मुंबई, पंर्ाट (संिभच संख्या
Ref.no.CGIT-1/07 of 2011) को िैसा दक अनुलग्नक में दिखाया गया िै,प्रकाजित करती िै िो केन्रीय सरकार को
सॉफ्ट कॉपी के साथ 11.03.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l
[सं. एल-16012/1/2010-आईआर(डीयू)]
दिलीप कुमार, अवर सजर्व
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1161
New Delhi, the 11th March, 2025
S.O. 428.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. no. CGIT-1/07 of 2011) of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal cum Labour Court-1, Mumbai, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the
employers in relation to The General Manager, India Government Mint, Mumbai, and Shri Sadanand R.
Palande, Worker’ Union, Carnac Bunder, Mumbai, which was received along with soft copy of the award by the
Central Government on 11.03.2025.
[No. L-16012/1/2010-IR(DU)]
DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVT.INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT NO.1, MUMBAI MUMBAI
Present
JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
Presiding Officer
REFERENCE CGIT -7 OF 2011
Parties:
For the first party management
: Mrs. Aneesha Narayanan, Adv
For the second party workman
: Mr.A.N.Koyande, Adv.
State
: Maharashtra
Mumbai, dated the 11th day of Feb’ 2025.
AWARD
Appropriate Government has referred the present reference to this Tribunal by order dated 15.4.2011.
“Whether the action of the management of India Government Mint, Mumbai in imposing the penalty of compulsory
retirement on shri S.R.Palande, Ex-assistant, Class II vide order dated 14/01/2010 is legal and justified? What relief
the workman is entitled to?“
Learned counsel for the workman on the basis of averment has made in the application for withdrawal of the present
case supported by affidavit that the case be dismissed as withdrawn.
Learned counsel for respondent has no objection to the above said prayer.
ORDER
For the foregoing reasons the present Industrial Dispute case CGIT-7 of 2011 is dismissed as withdrawn.
Award accordingly.
Justice ANIL KUMAR, I/c Presiding officer
नई दिल्ली, 12 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 429.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (a1947 dk 14 ) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
if’pe jsyos ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdkas vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V औद्योजगक fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; dksVk ds iapkV 10@1994¼lhvkbZ,l&24@2014½¼lh,uvkj&vkjtsdsVh060001772001½ izdkf”kr
djrh gSA
[सं. एल-40011/11/87-आईआर(बी-I)]
सलोनी, उप जनिेिक
New Delhi, the 12th March, 2025
S.O. 429.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 10/1994(CIS-24/2014)(CNR-RJKT06000041994) of the
Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Kota as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the
management of Western Railway and their workmen.
[No. L-40011/11/87-IR(B-I)]
SALONI, Dy. Director
1162
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
U;k;k/kh'k] vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/kdj.k¼dsUnzh;½dksVk]¼jkt-½
ihBklhu vf/kdkjh& Jh egs'k iqusBk] vkj-ts-,l- ¼ftyk tt laoxZ½
funsZ'k izdj.k dzekad%vkS-U;k-¼dsUnzh;½&10@1994¼lhvkbZ,l&24@2014½
¼lh,uvkj&vkjtsdsVh060000041994½
fnukad LFkkfir% 28-09-1994
izlax%
Hkkjr ljdkj] Je ea=ky;] ubZ fnYyh ds vkns'k dz- ,y&41011@11@87&Mh-II(ch)
funsZ'k@fookn vUrxZr /kkjk 10¼1½¼?k½ ,oa mi/kkjk 2¼d½
vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e]1947
e/;
laHkkxh; lfpo] if'pe jsyos deZpkjh ifj"kn] dksVk
&&izkFkhZ la?k
,oa
fMfotuy flXuy ,.M VsyhdkWe baftfu;j ¼D.S.T.E.½ ¼dUlVªD'ku½] aif'peh jsyos] dksVk
&&vizkFkhZ fu;kstd
mifLFkr
izkFkhZ Jfed dh vksj ls izfrfuf/k%&
Jh fnyhi flag ;kno
vizkFkhZ fu;kstd dh vksj ls izfrfuf/k%&
Jh eukst iqjh
%%vf/kfu.kZ;%%
fnukad%14-12-2023
Hkkjr ljdkj] Je ea=ky;] ubZ fnYyh ds izklkafxd vkns'k dzekad L&41011@11@87&D.II(B)ds tfj;s
fuEu funsZ'k fookn] vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼ftls vkxs **vf/kfu;e** ls lEcksf/kr fd;k tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 10¼1½?k½ ,oa mi/kkjk 2¼d½ ds
vUrxZr U;k;kf/kdj.k dks vf/kfu.kZ;kFkZ lEizsf"kr fd;k x;k gS%&
"Whether the action of Distt. Signal & Telecom Engineer Western Railway, Kota withdrawing the temporary
status vide order dated 20.02.1987 in respect of workmen mentioned in the annexure is justified? If not what
relief the workmen are entited to?"
fuEu Jfedksa dks fu;kstd }kjk vLFkk;h LVsVl iznku fd;k x;k Fkk&
1&lR; ukjk;.k iq= enuyky
2&jke flag iq= Hkqyk HkkbZ
3&vuoj csx iq= ljnkj csx ¼nkSjkus fopkj.k e`R;q½
3@1&ulhe csxe iRuh Lo- vuoj csx
3@2&Qsty csx iq= Lo- vuoj csx
3@3&[kq'kcw iq=h Lo- vuoj csx
3@4&Qst csx iq= Lo- vuoj csx
¼e`rd Jfed ds dk;eeqdkeku½
4&vCnqy jlhn iq= >qEek [kku
5&jes'k pUn iq= cythr flag
6&lrohj flag iq= v'kkjke
2&
mDr fookn] U;k;kf/kdj.k esa jsQj gksus ij iathc) dj i{kdkjksa dks mifLFkfr ckcr uksfVl tkjh fd, x,A uksfVl dh ikyuk esa
izkFkhZ i{k }kjk mifLFkr gksdj LVsVesUV vkWQ Dyse U;k;kf/kdj.k ds le{k izLrqr dj laf{kIr% ;g dFku fd;k x;k gS fd vizkFkhZ us vkns'k
dzekad E/Sig/615/1(Conts.) Vol. II fn- 31-12-86 ds }kjk izkFkhZ lR;ukjk;.k dks fn- 06-04-86] jke flag dks fn- 02-04-86] vuoj csx dks fn-
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1163
10-03-86] vCnqy j'khn dks fn- 09-09-1985] jes'k pUnz dks fn- 15-04-86] rFkk lrchj flag dks fn- 16-05-86 dks vLFkk;h deZpkjh dk ntkZ iznku
dj lHkh ykHk tks vLFkkbZ jsyos deZpkjh dks feyrs gS og fn, FksA vizkFkhZ us uksfVl la- E/Sig/615/1/(Conts.) Vol. II fn- 20-02-87 ftl ij
lgk;d ladsr ,oa nwj lapkj vfHk;Urk fuekZ.k dksVk ds gLrk{kj Fks] ds }kjk leLr izkFkhZx.k ds vLFkk;h LVsVl dks foMªks fd;k x;k FkkA tc
izkFkhZ i{k us le>kSrk vf/kdkjh o lgk;d Je vk;qDr ¼dsUnzh;½] dksVk dks gM+rky dk uksfVl la- KTT/STRIKE/87/7 fn- 28-02-87 nsdj
mUgsa iqu% lsok esa cgky fd, tkus dh izkFkZuk dh rks vizkFkhZ us mDr fookn ds yfEcr jgrs gq, fn- 05-03-87 dks izkFkhZx.k dks uksfVl la-
E/Sig/615/1/(Conts.) Vol. II uksfVl cksMZ ij yxkdj lsok ls c[kkZLr dj fn;k tks vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 33 ds izko/kkuksa dk
mYya?ku gSA bl fookn esa 'kkfey Jfedksa ds lkFk vizkFkhZ us ckads yky] jkepUnz] euksgj tSu o vU; Jfedksa dh rqyuk esa HksnHkko iw.kZ O;ogkj
fd;k gSA vizkFkhZ i{k us le>kSrk vf/kdkjh ds le{k dksbZ ,slk fjdkWMZ izLrqr ugha fd;k tks ;g lkfcr djrk gks fd izkFkhZx.k us tkyh dkMZ
izLrqr dj ukSdjh izkIr dh gksA izkFkhZx.k dks ,sls vkjksiksa ds fy, uk rks dksbZ vkjksi i= fn;k x;k gS vkSj uk gh vuq'kklukRed fu;eksa ds rgr
mudh voS/k o =qfViw.kZ NaVuh ls igys fu;ekuqlkj dksbZ tkap dh xbZA vizkFkhZ us izkFkhZx.k ds lfoZl dkMZ dh QksVks izfr U;k;kf/kdj.k ds le{k
is'k dj mudks ukSdjh ls fudyokus dk "kM;a= fd;k gS ftldh izkFkhZx.k dks dksbZ tkudkjh ugha gSA vizkFkhZ fu;kstd us izkFkhZx.k dks ukSdjh ls
fudkyrs le; vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ,Q ds izko/kkukas dk mYya?ku fd;k gS ,slh fLFkfr esa izkFkhZx.k dks ukSdjh ls fudkyus dh dk;Zokgh xSj
dkuwuh] vlaoS/kkfud ,oa vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ,Q ds izko/kkuksa ds fo:) gksus ls dk;Zokgh fujLr djus ;ksX; gS vkSj izkFkZuk dh gS fd izkFkhZx.k
dks lsok esa iqu% cgky djds vLFkk;h deZpkjh dk LVsVl iznku djrs gq, leLr ykHk fnyk;s tkosA
gka ;g mYysf[kr fd;k tkuk lehphu gksxk fd ;g izdj.k lsUVªy xouZesaV b.MLVªh;y fVªC;wuy] ubZ fnYyh ls vUrfjr
gksdj bl U;k;kf/kdj.k dks vf/kfu.kZ;kFkZ izkIr gqvk gSA
3&
vizkFkhZ fu;kstd dh vksj ls mDr Dyse esa of.kZr rF;ksa dk [k.Mu djrs gq, dk tokc izLrqr dj ;g izfrokn fd;k x;k gS fd
izkFkhZx.k }kjk tkyh dstqvy yscj dkMZ is'k djds vLFkk;h deZpkjh dk LVsVl gkfly fd;k x;k Fkk ftl dkj.k mudks fn- 20-02-87 uksfVl
nsdj 10 fnu esa tokc is'k djus ds fy, dgk x;k Fkk ysfdu muds }kjk vius cpko esa dksbZ tokc foHkkx esa izLrqr ugha fd;k x;k ftlls
;g fl) gks x;k fd mu ij izca/ku }kjk yxk, x, lHkh vkjksi lgh gSA izkFkhZx.k }kjk izLrqr tkyh dkMZ le>kSrk vf/kdkjh dks fn[kk, x, Fks
,oa mudks cpko ds fy, volj fn;k x;k Fkk vkSj izkFkZuk dh gS fd izkFkhZx.k }kjk tkyh dkMZ is'k dj jkstxkj gkfly fd;k x;k gS blfy,
izkFkhZx.k dk izkFkZuk i= lO;; [kkfjt fd;k tkosA
4&
izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls mDr tokc ds [k.Mu esa fnukad 12-06-90 dks izR;qRrj Hkh izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
5&
lk{; esa izkFkhZx.k us lR;ukjk;.k] vCnqy jlhn] lrohj flag] jes'kpUnz] vuoj csx rFkk vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls mn; flag ds ‘kiFk i=
izLrqr fd, x, gS ftu ij ,d&nwljs i{k }kjk ijLij ftjg dh xbZA mHk;i{k dh vksj ls nLrkosth lk{; Hkh izLrqr dh xbZ gSA izkFkhZ dh vksj
ls tks nLrkostkr izLrqr fd, x, gS muesa izn'kZ MCY;w 1 yxk;r 6 vizkFkhZ }kjk izkFkhZx.k dks fn, x, uksfVl dzekad
E/Sig/615/1/Const/Vol.II fnukad 20-02-87 ftlls izkFkhZx.k dk vLFkkbZ LVsVl~ rqjar izHkko ls jn~n fd;k x;k] izn'kZ MCY;w 7 izkFkhZx.k dk
vLFkkbZ LVsVl cgky djus ds laca/k esa vizkFkhZ ,oa le>kSrk vf/kdkjh o lgk;d Je vk;qDr ¼dsUnzh;½] dksVk dks fn;k x;k LVªkbd
uksfVl] izn'kZ MCY;w 8 izn'kZ MCY;w 7 dk tokc] izn'kZ MCY;w 9 i{kdkjku ds e/; le>kSRkk okrkZ fooj.k] izn'kZ MCY;w 10 vlQy okrkZ izfrosnu]
izn'kZ MCY;w 11 izkFkhZx.k dks fn- 05-03-87 ls lsok ls i`Fkd fd, tkus ds laca/k esa vizkFkhZ dk vkns'k ¼tks fd uksfVl cksMZ ij pLik fd;k x;k gS½
ftlds }kjk izkFkhZx.k dh lsok fnukad 05-03-87 e/;kg~u i'pkr ls lekIr dh xbZ] izn'kZ MCY;w 12 le>kSrk vf/kdkjh o lgk;d Je
vk;qDr ¼dsUnzh;½] dksVk }kjk tkjh izek.k i= la- 8¼16½@87&,l fn- 09-03-89] izn'kZ MCY;w 13 izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls lgk;d Je vk;qDr
¼dsUnzh; ds le{k½ dks izLrqr izkFkZuk i=] izn'kZ MCY;w 14 vizkFkhZ foHkkx ds gSMvkWfQl dk i= fn- 26-07-1984] izn'kZ MCY;w 15 vizkFkhZ foHkkx dk
i= la- E/Sig/1216/4 Vol.V fn- 09-09-91 gS tks Vh-,l- [kYyklh;ksa dh ukSdjh ls gVk, tkus ds ckn iqu% ukSdjh ij fy, tkus ds laca/k esa
gSA
vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls tks nLrkost is'k fd, x, gS muesa izn'kZ ,e-MCY;w-1@1 dsT;qy yscj dh HkrhZ ds laca/k esa i=] izn'kZ ,e-MCY;w-
1@2 yxk;r ,e-MCY;w- 1@7 izkFkhZx.k ds lsok dkMksZa dh QksVks izfr] izn'kZ ,e-MCY;w- 1@8 izkFkhZx.k ds fu;kstu ds laca/k esa nLrkost ¼ftlesa
izkFkhZx.k ds lfoZl dkMZ bR;kfn ds uacj vafdr gS½] izn'kZ ,e-MCY;w- 1@9 vizkFkhZ foHkkx dk vkWfQl vkWMZj dzekad E/Sig/615/1/Const/Vol.II
fn- 31-12-86] izn'kZ ,e-MCY;w-1@10 yxk;r izn'kZ ,e-MCY;w-1@15 izkFkhZx.k ds lfoZl dkMksZa ds lR;kiu ls lacaf/kr
nLrksotksa dh QksVks izfr;ka] izn'kZ ,e-MCY;w-1@16 yxk;r ,e-MCY;w- 1@21 izkFkhZx.k dks vizkFkhZ foHkkx }kjk fn;k x;k
uksfVl dzekad E/Sig/615/1/Const/Vol.II fnukad 20-02-87 ftlls mudk vLFkkbZ LVsVl~ rqjar izHkko ls jn~n fd;k x;k]
izn'kZ ,e-MCY;w-1@22 yxk;r izn'kZ ,e-MCY;w- 1@25 vizkFkhZ foHkkx dk Qjojh&ekpZ 87 ds gktjh jftLVj] izn'kZ ,e-
MCY;w 1@26 yxk;r izn'kZ ,e-MCY;w- 1@31 izkFkhZx.k dks lsok ls i`Fkd fd, tkus ds vkns'k gSaA
6&
mHk;i{k dh cgl vafre lquh xbZ ,oa fyf[kr cgl dk voyksdu fd;k x;k tks mudh vksj ls izLrqr vius&vius vH;kosnuksa ds
vuq:i gh jgh gSA
7&
gLrxr izdj.k esa U;k;kf/kdj.k dks ;g ns[kuk gS fd D;k vizkFkhZ }kjk vkns'k fn- 20-02-87 ls izkFkhZx.k dk vLFkkbZ deZpkjh dk
ntkZ fujLr djuk mfpr ,oa oS/k gS ;k ugha\
izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls lk{; esa lR;ukjk;.k] vCnqy j'khn] lrohj flag] jes'kpUnz] vuoj csx ds 'kiFk i= izLrqr fd, x, gSA izkFkhZ
lR;ukjk;.k us lk{; esa izLrqr vius 'kiFk i= esa LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse esa of.kZr rF;ksa dh iqujko`fRr djrs gq, ;g rF; crk;k gS fd mldks
fnukad 03-04-1985] vuoj csx dks fnukad 06-03-1985] vCnqy j'khn dks fnukad 28-04-1984] jes'k pUnz dks fnukad 03-04-1985] rFkk lrchj flag
dks fnukad 03-04-1985 dks fu;kstd us lsok esa fu;ksftr fd;k rFkk lR;ukjk;.k dks fn- 06-04-85] vuoj csx dks fnukad 10-03-85] vCnqy j'khn
dks fn- 09-09-1985] jes'k pUnz dks fn- 15-04-85] rFkk lrchj flag dks fn- 16-05-86 dks vLFkk;h deZpkjh dk ntkZ iznku fd;k FkkA vLFkkbZ ntkZ
izkIr djus ds i'pkr izkFkhZx.k mu lHkh ykHkksa ds gdnkj cu tkrs gSa tks fd ,d LFkkbZ jsyos deZpkjh dks feyrs gSa] izkFkhZ rFkk mlds lkfFk;ksa dks
1164
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
vizkFkhZ fu;kstd us uksfVl fn- 20-02-87 tks fd laoS/kkfud n`f"V ls xyr Fkk ds }kjk mudks izkIr vLFkkbZ LVsVl dks jnn~ dj fn;k x;k Fkk
tcfd HkrhZ ds le; mUgksaus vizkFkhZ dks dksbZ lfoZl dkMZ tek ugha djok;k] mUgksaus ek= 2@&:- jkf'k ,oa rhu QksVks fn, FksA lfoZl dkMZ dh
QksVks;ka vizkFkhZ us dgka ls vkSj dSls izkIr dh bldh uk rks izkFkhZ dks vkSj uk gh mlds lkfFk;ksa dks tkudkjh gSaA vizkFkhZ us izkFkhZ ,oa mlds
lkfFk;ksa dh jsy lsok fn- 05-03-87 ls fcuk dksbZ tkap fd, lekIr dj nh vkSj bl laca/k esa vkns'k vikzFkhZ ds dk;kZy; ds uksfVl cksMZ ij
yxk;k x;k ftls fdlh Hkh deZdkj dks loZ ugha fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ us ftjg esa dFku fd;k gS fd mlus HkrhZ ds le; lh-,l-vkbZ- dks dksbZ
lfoZl dkMZ ugha fn;kA jsyos }kjk izksM;wl fd;s x;s lfoZl dkMZ igys dHkh dksVZ esa ugha fn[kk;s x;sA fnukad 28-11-1990 dks fnYyh ds dsl esa
dksbZ lfoZl dkMZ vkbZ-Vh- esa is'k ugha fd;sA mls irk ugha fd fnukad 17-01-1991 dks muds tokc eas mUgksus foHkkx }kjk tks dkMZl fnukad 28-
11-1990 dks is'k fd;s x;s Fks ds ckjs esa dksbZ 'kd is'k fd;k ;k ughaA jsyos }kjk mls dksbZ dkj.k crkvksa uksfVl tkjh ugha fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ
vCnqy jlhn us lk{; esa izLrqr vius 'kiFk i= esa LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse esa of.kZr rF;ksa dh iqujko`fRr djrs gq, ;g rF; crk;k gS fd mu ij
yxk, x, >wBs vkjksi dh dksbZ tkap ugha dh xbZ tks fd uSlfxZd U;k; ds fu;eksa ds fo:) gSA izkFkhZ] lR;ukjk;.k] vuoj csx] jes'kpUn o
lrohj flag dks vizkFkhZ us nqckjk ukSdjh ij j[k fy;k gS vkSj izkFkhZ us ftjg esa ;g dFku fd;k gS fd og lh-,l-vkbZ-lh- esa HkrhZ gqvk FkkA mlus
HkrhZ ds le; dksbZ dkMZ o nks :i;s tek ugha djok;s FksA fnukad 04-03-1987 dks mldks dksbZ ^^NaVuh^^ dk uksfVl ugha fn;k] uk gh dksbZ
jftLVªh Hksth xbZA ;g ckr xyr gS fd fn- 05-03-87 dks mudks NaVuh dk eqvkotk nsus ds fy, Hkqxrku fd;k tk jgk gks vkSj mUgksus ysus ls
badkj dj fn;k gksA ;g ckr xyr gS fd dsUnzh; U;k;kf/kdj.k] ubZ fnYyh esa mUgksaus dksbZ lfoZl dkMZ is'k fd, gks vkSj ;g dguk Hkh xyr gS
fd muds lfoZl dkMZ muds lkeus iz'kklu us U;k;ky; dks fn[kk, gksA izkFkhZ lrohj flag us lk{; esa izLrqr vius 'kiFk i= esa LVsVesaV vkWQ
Dyse esa of.kZr rF;ksa dh iqujko`fRr djrs gq, ;g dFku fd;k gS fd mls ukSdjh ls fudkyus ds i'pkr iqu% fnukad 08-01-90 dks ukSdjh ij j[k
fy;k Fkk ,oa fn- 21-01-87 ls 08-01-90 rd ds osru dk Hkqxrku ugha fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ us ftjg esa ;g dFku fd;k gS fd og jsyos esa lh-,l-
vkbZ-lh- esa ukSdjh esa HkrhZ gqvk FkkA mls mlds nksLrksa ls HkrhZ dh tkudkjh feyh FkhA HkrhZ ds le; mlls dksbZ nLrkost ugha ekaxsa x;s blfy,
mlus dksbZ nLrkost tek ugha djok;sA mldks ukSdjh ls gVkus dk dksbZ uksfVl o eqvkotk oxSjg ugha fn;k x;kA mlus HkrhZ gksrs le; dksbZ
lfoZl dkMZ tek ugha djok;k FkkA mlus lh-,l-vkbZ- ls igys jsyos esa ukSdjh ugha dh FkhA izkFkhZ jes'k pUn us lk{; esa izLrqr vius 'kiFk i=
esa LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse esa of.kZr rF;ksa dh iqujko`fRr djrs gq, ;g dFku fd;k gS fd mls ukSdjh ls fudkyus ds i'pkr iqu% fn- 22-09-88 dks
ukSdjh ij j[k fy;k Fkk ,oa fn- 21-01-87 ls 21-09-88 rd ds osru dk Hkqxrku ugha fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ us ftjg esa ;g dFku fd;k gS fd og
lcls igys jsyos esa lh-,l-vkbZ-lh-¼fuekZ.k½ esa HkrhZ gqvk FkkA mlus HkrhZ ds le; dksbZ nLrkost is'k ugha fd, vkSj uk gh mlls dksbZ nLrkost
ekaxs x,A mls lsok eqfDr vkns'k ugha feyk] mls dksbZ uksfVl ugha fn;k Fkk] mls fcuk uksfVl fn, gh lsok eqDr dj fn;k FkkA mls ukSdjh ls
gVkus ls igys uksfVl eqvkotk ugha fn;kA mldks nqckjk jsyos esa fn- 22-09-88 dks ukSdjh ij j[kk x;kA izkFkhZ vuoj csx us lk{; esa izLrqr
vius 'kiFk i= esa LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse esa of.kZr rF;ksa dh iqujko`fRr djrs gq, ;g dFku fd;k gS fd mls ukSdjh ls fudkyus ds i'pkr iqu%
fnukad 24-09-88 dks ukSdjh ij j[k fy;k Fkk ,oa fn- 21-01-87 ls 23-09-88 rd ds osru dk Hkqxrku ugha fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ us ftjg esa ;g
dFku fd;k gS fd og lcls igys jsyos esa lh-,l-vkbZ-lh- esa HkrhZ gqvk FkkA mlus HkrhZ ds le; dksbZ nLrkost tek ugha djok, Fks] mlls HkrhZ
ds le; dksbZ dksbZ nLrkost ugha ekaxs x, FksA mldks ukSdjh ls gVkus dk dksbZ uksfVl o eqvkotk oxSjg ugha fn;k x;kA mldks nqckjk jsyos esa
ukSdjh ij j[k fy;k x;k gS] bl le; mls iwjk osru fey jgk gSA mlus HkrhZ ds le; dksbZ lfoZl dkMZ ugha tek ugha djok;kA
vizkFkhZ fu;kstd dh vksj ls lk{; esa mn; flag dk ‘kiFk i= izLrqr fd;k x;k gS ftlesa mUgksaus tokc LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse esa of.kZr
rF;ksa dh iqujko`fRr dh gS vkSj ftjg esa ;g dFku fd;k gS fd vCnqy j'khn dks fn- 09-09-1985] vuoj csx dks fnukad 10-03-1986] lR;ukjk;.k
dks fn- 06-04-1986] jes'kpan dks fn- 16-04-1986] lrohj dks fnukad 16-05-1986 dks VsEizsjh LVsVl fn;k Fkk vkSj fn- 20-02-1987 dks mDr Jfedksa
dk VsEizsjh LVsVl vkWMj dks foMªks dj fy;k x;k Fkk tks izn'kZ MCY;w&1 yxk;r MCY;w&6 gSA lHkh Jfedksa izn'kZ MCY;q&1 ls lsok ls gVk fn;k
FkkA mls bl ckr dh tkudkjh ugha gS fd izkFkhZx.k dks lsok ls i`Fkd djrs le; ;k VsEizsjh LVsVl foMªks djus ls igys dksbZ uksfVl fn;k vFkok
ughaA mls bl ckr dh tkudkjh ugh agS fd mudks lsok ls i`Fkd djrs le; vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds izko/kkuksa dh ikyuk dh xbZ ;k
ughaA mls bl ckr dh tkudkjh ugha gS fd izkFkhZx.k dks lsok ls fudkyus ls iwoZ ofj"Brk lwph dk izdk'ku fd;k x;k Fkk ;k ugha rFkk muls
dfu"B Jfedx.k orZeku esa lsok esa dk;Zjr gksA mls bl ckr dh tkudkjh ugha gS fd mDr Jfedx.k dks ukSdjh ls fdl ckr ij fudkyk x;k
gS D;ksafd VsEizsjh LVsVl foMªks fd;k x;k gSA ;g ckr lgh gS fd izkFkhZx.k mlds dk;Zdky esa lsok esa HkrhZ gq, FksA izkFkhZx.k dk lfoZl fjdkWMZ
ugha cuk;k x;k Fkk D;ksafd budks izkstsD'ku ds fy, HkrhZ fd;k x;k FkkA izkFkhZx.k dk lfoZl dkMZ lqijokbtj us cuk;k Fkk tc mlus 'kiFki=
izLrqr fd;k rc lfoZl dkMZ xqe gks pqds FksA mlds 'kiFki= esa dksVZ esa lfoZl dkMZ fn[kkus okyh ckr vafdr gS og lfoZl dkMZ mlus ugha
fn[kk, tks fjdkWMZ ds vk/kkj ij fy[kh x;h gSA izn'kZ MCY;w 15 muds foHkkx ls tkjh gqvk gSaA ;g ckr lgh gS fd izn'kZ MCY;q 14 ds }kjk
tujy eSutj dks 100 vknfe;ksa ds HkrhZ dh Lohd`rh nh xbZ FkhA 100 esa ls fdrus vknfe;ksa dks HkrhZ fd;k x;k vkSj fdrus ml le; jksy esa Fks
mldks tkudkjh ugha gSA mls irk ugha gS fd izkFkhZx.k ds vfrfjDr vkSj fdlh deZpkjh dks ukSdjh ls fudkyk ;k ughaA mls tkudkjh ugha gS
fd tc bu Jfedksa dks ukSdjh ij nqckjk j[kk rc fiNyk Hkqxrku budks fd;k x;k ;k ughaA
8&
bl izdkj i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; ds foospu o fo'ys"k.k ls ;g izdV gks jgk gS fd bl izdj.k esa vizkFkhZ fu;kstd dk ;g dFku
jgk gS fd izkFkhZx.k }kjk foHkkx esa QthZ lfoZl dkMZ tek djus ds dkj.k fn- 20-02-87 ls mudk vLFkkbZ LVsVl~ lekIr~@jn~n fd;k x;k gS o
mudks fnukad 20-02-87 dks vLFkkbZ LVsV~l lekIr djus ds uksfVl ds lkFk 10 fnu esa fyf[kr tokc nsus ds fy, dgk x;k Fkk ,oa 10 fnu eas
dksbZ tokc ugha nsus ds dkj.k fn- 05-03-87 ls izkFkhZx.k dks lsok ls i`Fkd fd;k x;k gSa tcfd izkFkhZx.k dk ;g dFku jgk gS fd muds }kjk
dksbZ QthZ lfoZl dkMZ foHkkx esa ugha tek fd, x, gS ,oa uk gh mudks vizkFkhZ foHkkx us fn- 20-02-87 dks vLFkkbZ LVsVl~ lekIr djrs le;
dksbZ vkjksi i= fn;k x;k gS rFkk fcuk vkjksi i= fn, ,oa fcuk dksbZ tkap dk;Zokgh fd, mudks fnukad 05-03-87 ls lsok ls i`Fkd fd;k x;k
gSA vizkFkhZ fu;kstd dh vksj ls vius dFkuksa ds laca/k esa dksbZ fo'oluh; lk{; is'k ugha dh xbZ gS lfoZl dkMZ QthZ o cukoVh gksus ds laca/k esa
Hkh muds }kjk izdj.k esa dksbZ lk{; is'k ugha dh xbZ] uk gh muds }kjk of.kZr lfoZl dkMksZa dh ewy izfr U;k;ky; esa izLrqr dh xbZ gS vkSj
vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr xokg mn;flag us viuh lk{; esa ewy lfoZl dkMZ muds dk;kZy; esa ugha feyuk crk;k gS vkSj mudks xqe gksuk
crk;k gS ysfdu nLrkost xqe gksus ds laca/k esa muds }kjk dh xbZ dk;Zokgh ds laca/k esa dksbZ lk{; is'k ugha dh xbZ gS] vizkFkhZ ds xokg us
izkFkhZx.k ds fo:) foHkkxh; tkap yfEcr gksuk crk;k gS ysfdu bl laca/k esa Hkh dksbZ lk{; izLrqr ugha dh xbZ gSA vizkFkhZ fu;kstd us izkFkhZx.k
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1165
dks lsok ls i`Fkd djus ls iwoZ uk rks dksbZ uksfVl fn;k gS uk gh uksfVl ds cnys dksbZ osru fn;k gSA ;gh ugha izkFkhZx.k ds vLFkkbZ LVsVl dks
fu;kstd us vkns'k fnukad 20-02-87 }kjk fujLr fd;k gS vkSj vkns'k fn- 05-03-87 }kjk mUgsa lsok ls i`Fkd fd;k x;k gS ysfdu izkFkhZx.k
vCnwy jlhn dks fn- 24-08-88] lR;ukjk;.k dks fn-22-09-88] vuoj csx dks fn- 24-09-88] jes'k pUn dks fn- 22-09-88 ,oa lrohj flag dks fn-
07-01-90 ls iqu% ukSdjh ij fy;k x;k gS ftlds laca/k esa izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izn'kZ MCY;w 15 is'k fd;k x;k gS vkSj vius l'kiFk c;kuksa esa Hkh
mDr rF; of.kZr fd, gSA bl izdkj izkFkhZx.k dks iqu% ukSdjh esa mlh in ij okil ys fy;k x;k gS ;fn okLro eas izkFkhZx.k ds QthZ yscj
lfoZl dkMZ Fks mUgsa okil ukSdjh ij D;ksa fy;k x;kA
vizkFkhZ fu;kstd us izkFkhZx.k dks lsok ls i`Fkd djus ls iwoZ uk rks dksbZ pktZ'khV nh vkSj uk gh dksbZ foHkkxh; tkap djokbZ xbZ]
tcfd bl laca/k esa Hkkjrh; jsyos LFkkiuk fu;ekoyh ds fu;e 2005 esa ;g izko/kku gS fd ^^mu vfu;r etnwjksa dks Lohdk;Z gd vkSj
fo'ks"kkf/kdkj ftUgsa ¼;FkkfLFkfr½ 120 fnu ;k 360 fnu dk fujarj fu;kstu iwjk gksus ds ckn vLFkk;h ds :i esa ekuk tkrk gS ¼vFkkZr ftUgsa
vLFkk;h gSfl;r] os nh xbZ gS½ & ¼d½ vLFkk;h ds :i esa ekus tkus okys vfu;r etnwj bl fu;ekoyh ds v/;k; XXIII esa ;Fkkfu/kkZfjr
vLFkk;h jsy deZpkfj;ksa dks Lohdk;Z vf/kdkjksa vkSj Qk;nksa ds gdnkj gSA ,sls etnwjksa dks Lohdk;Z vf/kdkjksa vkSj fo'ks"kkf/kdkjkas esa vuq'kklu ,oa
vihy fu;eksa ds Qk;ns Hkh 'kkfey gSA rFkkfi visf{kr p;u&Nkuchu ds ckn vLFkk;h@LFkk;h@fu;fer laoxZ esa vkesyu ls iwoZ dh mudh lsok
ofj"Brk ds iz;kstukFkZ x.kuk esa ugha yh tk,xh vkSj Nkuchu@p;u ds ckn mudh fu;fer fu;qfDr dh rkjh[k ls vU; fu;fer@vLFkk;h
deZpkfj;ksa dh rqyuk esa mudh ofj"Brk fu/kkZfjr dh tk,xhA rFkkfi] ;g bl mica/k ds v/;/khu gS fd ;fn dfri; deZpkfj;ksa dh ofj"Brk
fdlh vU; jhfr ls] ;k rks U;kf;d fu.kZ;ksa ds vuqlj.k esa ;k vU;Fkk] igys gh fu/kkZfjr dj nh xbZ gks rks mlesa ifjorZu ugha fd;k tk,xkA
ifj;kstuk vfu;r etnwj lfgr vfu;r etnwj isa'ku laca/kh Qk;nksa ds iz;kstukFkZ vgZd lsok ds :i esa fujarj fu;kstu ds fofgr fnuksa ds iwjs
gksus ij vLFkk;h gSfl;r izkIr djus ds ckn vkSj fu;fer vkesyu ls igys muds }kjk dh xbZ lsok dh dsoy vk/kh vof/k fxus tkus ds fy,
ik= gksaxsA ;g Qk;nk muds fu;fr fu;kstu esa vkesyu ds ckn gh Lohdk;Z gksxkA os vfu;r etnwj] ftUgksus vLFkk;h gSfl;r izkIr dj yh gS]
muds uke tek NwV~Vh dks fu;fer lsok esa vkesyu ij u, in ij vxzsuhr djus ds Hkh gdnkj gksaxsA nSfud etnwjh okys vfu;r etnwj bu
Qk;nksa ds gdnkj ugha gksaxsA^^ bl izdkj mDr fu;e ds vuqlkj vLFkk;h fLFkfr iznku djus ij vLFkk;h jsyos deZpkfj;ksa dks vuq'kklu vkSj
vihy fu;eksa lfgr Lohdk;Z vf/kdkj vkSj fo'ks"kkf/kdkj izkIr gSa ysfdu bl izdj.k esa ;g Lohdk;Z fLFkfr gS fd QthZ lfoZl dkMZ izLrqr djus
ds fy, izkFkhZx.k dks dksbZ vkjksi i= tkjh ugha fd;k x;k uk gh vuq'kklu ,oa vihy fu;eksa ds rgr dksbZ dk;Zokgh dh xbZ gS vkSj fcuk
fu;ekuqlkj dk;Zokgh fd, mudh lsok,a lekIr dh xbZ gSA
;gka bl rF; dks Hkh n`f"Vxr j[kk tkuk mfpr gksxk fd izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls lsUVªy xouZesaV b.MLVªh;y fVªC;wuy de yscj dksVZ]
t;qij }kjk izdj.k la- lh-th-vkbZ-Vh-&65@2000 izkFkhZ txnh'k ,oa lh-th-vkbZ-Vh-&73@2000 izkFkhZ dsyhjke ds izdj.k esa fn- 13-06-2001 dks
ikfjr vf/kfu.kZ;ksa dh izekf.kr izfr;ksa dh QksVks izfr;ka izLrqr dj ;g rdZ fn;k gS fd izkFkhZx.k dk izdj.k Hkh txnh'k ,oa dsyhjke ds izdj.kksa
ds leku gS D;ksafd izkFkhZx.k dks Hkh txnh'k ,oa dsyh jke ds lkFk gh vizkFkhZ fu;sktd us vkns'k izn'kZ MCY;w 11 }kjk fn- 05-03-2007 dks
e/;kg~u i'pkr ls lsok ls i`Fkd fd;k x;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZx.k] txnh'k ,oa dsyhjke ds laca/k esa ikfjr vf/kfu.kZ;ksa ds
fo:) vizkFkhZ foHkkx }kjk dksbZ vihy izLrqr ugha dh xbZ gS vkSj mDr vf/kfu.kZ; vafrerk ys pqds gSA mDr rdZ ds ifjizs{; eas lsok i`Fkdrk
vkns'k MCY;w 11 voyskdu fd;k x;k ftlls ;g izdV gks jgk gS fd mDr vkns'k dks uksfVl cksMZ ij pLik fd;k x;k gS] ftlds }kjk izkFkhZx.k
dh lsok,a fn- 05-03-87 e/;kg~u i'pkr ls lekIr dh xbZ gS] mDr vkns'k esa ek= ;g rF; of.kZr gSa fd vkns'k esa of.kZr izkFkhZx.k }kjk QkWYl
dsT;wy yscj lfoZl dkMZ HkrhZ ds le; izLrqr fd, x, Fks ftuds laca/k esa izkFkhZx.k ls 10 fnu esa tokc ekaxk x;k Fkk muds }kjk mDr vof/k esa
tokc ugha fn, tkus ds dkj.k mudh lsok lekIr dh xbZ gSA mDr vkns'k dh dze la- 1 esa of.kZr txnh'k izlkn iq= txnso ds laca/k esa Hkh
Hkkjr ljdkj }kjk jsQjsal lsUVªy xouZesaV b.MLVªh;y fVªC;wuy de yscj dksVZ] t;qij dks izsf"kr fd;k x;k Fkk tks izdj.k la- lh-th-vkbZ-Vh-
&65@2000 ij ntZ fd;k x;k rFkk blh uksfVl ds dze la- 7 esa of.kZr Jfed dsyh jke iq= dj.kflag ds laca/k esa Hkkjr ljdkj }kjk jsQjsal
lsUVªy xouZesaV b.MLVªh;y fVªC;wuy de yscj dksVZ] t;qij dks izsf"kr fd;k Fkk tks izdj.k la- lh-th-vkbZ-Vh-&76@2000 ij ntZ fd;k x;k
mDr izdj.kksa esa U;k;kf/kdj.k }kjk fn- 13-06-2001 dks vf/kfu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k x;k gS ftuesa vizkFkhZ }kjk izkFkhZx.k ds vLFkk;h LVsVl foMªks djus
ds vkns'k fnukad 20-02-87 ,oa lsok ls i`Fkd djus ds vkns'k fn- 05-03-87 dks voS/k ,oa vuqfpr ekuk gSA pwafd izkFkhZx.k dks igys gh lsok esa ys
fy;k x;k Fkk blfy, izkFkhZx.k dks lsok esa fujarjrk ds lkFk lsok lekfIr ds le; tks osru og izkIr dj jgs Fks cdk;k osru izkIr djus dk
gdnkj Hkh ekuk gSA mDr vf/kfu.kZ;ksa ds fo:) vizkFkhZ fu;kstd }kjk dksbZ vihy dh xbZ gks vkSj vihy esa mDr vf/kfu.kZ;ksa dks fujLr ;k
la'kksf/kr fd;k x;k gks ,slk dksbZ dFku vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls ugha fd;k x;k gS] izkFkhZx.k dk gLrxr izdj.k Hkh txnh'k ,oa dsyhjke ds leku
gSA
9&
bl izdkj mijksDr foospu o fo'ys"k.k ds ifjizs{; esa vizkFkhZ fu;kstd }kjk vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ,Q esa of.kZr
izko/kkuksa dk mYya?ku djrs gq, ,oa fu;ekuqlkj tkap fd, fcuk izkFkhZx.k dk vLFkk;h LVsVl vkns'k fnukad 20-02-87 }kjk fujLr fd;k x;k gS
ftlds laca/k esa izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls le>kSrk vf/kdkjh ,oa lgk;d Je vk;qDr ¼dsUnzh;½ dksVk ds le{k fookn fn- 28-02-87 dks izLrqr fd;k
x;k Fkk vkSj bl le>kSrk dk;Zokgh ds yfEcr jgrs gq, vizkFkhZ fu;kstd us fookn esa lfEefyr lHkh izkFkhZx.k dks vkns'k fnukad 05-03-87 }kjk
lsok ls i`Fkd fd;k gS mDr nksuksa vkns'k voS/k ,oa vuqfpr gksus ls fujLr ?kksf"kr fd, tkus ;ksX; gS lkFk gh izkFkhZx.k dks vizkFkhZ fu;kstd }kjk
iwoZ esa gh lsok esa okil ys fy;k x;k gS blfy, izkFkhZx.k lsok esa fujarjrk ds lkFk&lkFk cdk;k osru tks og lsok lekfIr ds le; izkIr dj
jgs Fks] Hkh izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh ?kksf"kr gksus ;ksX; gSaA
izkFkhZ jkeflag izkjaHk ls gh vuqifLFkr gS mlus izdj.k esa Hkkx ugha fy;k gS ,slh fLFkfr esa mlds }kjk izdj.k esa vfHk:fp ugha ysus ls
mldk izdj.k ^^fookn jfgr^^ gks tkrk gSA
ifj.kkeLo:i Hkkjr ljdkj] Je ea=ky;] ubZ fnYyh }kjk izklkafxd vkns'k dzekad L&41011@11@87&D.II(B) ds tfj;s lEizsf"kr
1166
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 15, 2025/PHALGUNA 24, 1946
[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
funsZ'k@jsQzsUl fookn dks blh vuq:i mRrfjr fd;k tkrk gS fd vizkFkhZ fu;kstd dk vkns'k fn- 20-02-87 ftlds }kjk izkFkhZx.k 1&lR;
ukjk;.k iq= enuyky] 3&vuoj csx iq= ljnkj csx ¼nkSjkus fopkj.k e`R;q½] 4&vCnqy jlhn iq= >qEek [kku] 5&jes'k pUn iq= cythr flag]
6&lrohj flag iq= v'kkjke dk vLFkk;h LVsVl fujLr ¼jsQjsal vuqlkj foMªks½ fd;k x;k gS og voS/k ,oa vuqfpr gksus ls vikLr@fujLr fd;k
tkrk gS pwafd izkFkhZx.k dks vizkFkhZ fu;kstd }kjk iwoZ esa gh lsok esa okil ys fy;k x;k gS blfy, izkFkhZx.k lsok esa fujarjrk ds lkFk&lkFk
cdk;k osru tks og lsok lekfIr ds le; izkIr dj jgs Fks] Hkh izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSaA
izkFkhZ vuoj csx dh e`R;q gksus ls mlds dk;eeqdke mDr cdk;k osru izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gksxsaA
izkFkhZ jkeflag izkjaHk ls gh vuqifLFkr gS mlus izdj.k esa Hkkx ugha fy;k gS ,slh fLFkfr esa mlds }kjk izdj.k esa
vfHk:fp ugha ysus ls mldk izdj.k ^^fookn jfgr^^ gks tkrk gSA
egs'k iqusBk] U;k;k/kh'k
vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/kdj.k¼dsUnzh;½]dksVk¼jkt-½
vf/kfu.kZ; vkt fnukad 14-12-2023 dks [kqys U;k;kf/kdj.k esa lquk;k tkdj gLrk{kfjr fd;k x;k ftls fu;ekuqlkj leqfpr ljdkj
dks izdk'kukFkZ fHktok;k tkosA
नई दिल्ली, 12 मार्च, 2025
का.आ. 430.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (a1947 dk 14 ) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
eSustj eSå fgUnqLrku dULVªD'ku daiuh fyå ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V
औद्योजगक fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;
ds iapkV (89/2022) izdkf”kr djrh
gSA
[सं. एल-12025/01/2025-आईआर(बी-I)-36]
सलोनी, उप जनिेिक
New Delhi, the 12th March, 2025
S.O. 430.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 89/2022)of the Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Bhilwara as
shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Manger,M/s.Hindustan
Construction Company Limited and their workmen.
[No. L-12025/01/2025-IR(B-I)-36]
SALONI, Dy. Director
ihBklhu vf/kdkjh%&Jh lq'khy dqekj 'kekZ] ¼ftyk U;k;k/kh'k laoxZ½
çdj.k la[;k: 89@2022 ,y-lh-vkj-
Jh HkS:yky xqtZj iq= Jh madkj xqtZj] }kjk-v/;{k] egkea=h] fuekZ.k ,oa vlaxfBr Jfed la?k] n'kgjk eSnku ds ikl
esujksM] pkjHkqtk] jkorHkkVk] ftyk&fprkSMx< A
&&çkFkhZ
cuke
1& çkstsDV eSustj eSå fgUnqLrku dULVªD'ku daiuh fyå]7&8] vkj-,-ih-ih-] jkorHkkVk]
ftyk&fprkSMx<A
2& eSå lc dksUVªsDVj] ckcwyky catkjk] }kjk-eSå.k~ fgUnqLrku dULVªD'ku daiuh
fyå]vkj-,-ih-ih-]lkbZV 7&8] jkorHkkVk] ftyk&fprkSMx< A
3& ifj;kstuk funs'kd] vkj-,-ih-ih-]lkbZV 7&8] jkorHkkVk] ftyk&fprkSMx< A
&&foi{khx.k
mifLFkr%&
[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]
भारत का रािपत्र : मार्च 15, 2025, /फाल् गुन 24, 1946
1167
çkFkhZ dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ughaA
Jh vkj-,l- lksMk.kh] vf/koäk foi{kh laå nks dh vksj lsA
%% iapkV %%
fnukad 13-07-2024
çkFkhZ us Lo;a dk lsok i`Fkddj.k ckcr fookn foi{khx.k ds fo:) /kkjk 2-, vkSåfoåvf/k0 1947 ds rgr
bl U;k;ky; esa is'k fd;kA
çkFkhZ dh vksj ls foi{khx.k ls jkthukek dj ysus ds QyLo:i çdj.k esa dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha pkgus ckcr
çkFkZuki= fnukad 15-3-3024 dks çLrqr dj fn;k x;k gSA pwafd çkFkhZ dk foi{khx.k ls jkthukek gks x;k gS rFkk vc og
çdj.k esa dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha pkgrk gSA vr% ÞdksbZ fookn ugha jgkß vk'k; dk iapkV tkjh fd;k tkrk gSA
iapkV dh çfr dsUæ ljdkj dks çdk'kukFkZ Hksth tk;sA
U;k;k/kh'k]
vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/kdj.k ,o]
Je U;k;ky;, HkhyokMk A
iapkV vkt fnukad 13-7-2023 dks [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA
U;k;k/kh'k]
vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/kdj.k ,o]
Je U;k;ky;, HkhyokMk A
% vkS|ksfxd U;k;kf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;, HkhyokM+k] jktå %
ihBklhu vf/kdkjh%&Jh lq'khy dqekj 'kekZ] ¼ftyk U;k;k/kh'k laoxZ½
çdj.k la[;k: 56@2022 ,y-lh-vkj-
Jh ukjk.k xqtZj iq= Jh madkj xqtZj] }kjk-v/;{k] egkea=h] fuekZ.k ,oa vlaxfBr Jfed la?k] n'kgjk eSnku ds ikl esujksM]
pkjHkqtk] jkorHkkVk] ftyk&fprkSMx< A
&&çkFkhZ
cuke
1& çkstsDV eSustj, eSå fgUnqLrku dULVªD'ku daiuh fyå]7&8] vkj-,-ih-ih-] jkorHkkVk]
ftyk&fprkSMx<A
2& eSå lc dksUVªsDVj] ckcwyky catkjk] }kjk-eSå.k~ fgUnqLrku dULVªD'ku daiuh
fyå]vkj-,-ih-ih-]lkbZV 7&8] jkorHkkVk] ftyk&fprkSMx< A
3& ifj;kstuk funs'kd] vkj-,-ih-ih-]lkbZV 7&8] jkorHkkVk] ftyk&fprkSMx< A
&&foi{khx.k
mifLFkr%&
çkFkhZ dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ughaA
Jh vkj-,l- lksMk.kh] vf/koäk foi{kh laå nks dh vksj lsA
fnukad 13-07-2024
çkFkhZ us Lo;a dk lsok i`Fkddj.k ckcr fookn foi{khx.k ds fo:) /kkjk 2-, vkSåfoåvf/k0 1947 ds rgr
bl U;k;ky; esa is'k fd;kA
çkFkhZ dh vksj ls foi{khx.k ls jkthukek dj ysus ds QyLo:i çdj.k esa dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha pkgus ckcr
çkFkZuki= fnukad 15-3-3024 dks çLrqr dj fn;k x;k gSA pwafd çkFkhZ dk foi{khx.k ls jkthukek gks x;k gS rFkk vc og
çdj.k esa dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha pkgrk gSA vr% ÞdksbZ fookn ugha jgkß vk'k; dk iapkV tkjh fd;k tkrk gSA
iapkV dh çfr dsUæ ljdkj dks çdk'kukFkZ Hksth tk;sA
lq'khy dqekj 'kekZ] U;k;k/kh'k]
Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064
and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.
GORAKHA NATH YADAVA
Digitally signed by GORAKHA NATH
YADAVA
Date: 2025.03.25 15:36:50 +05'30'