2266 GI/2025

(1441)

रजजस्ट्री सं. डी.एल. (एन) 04/0007/2003—05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

xxxGIDHxxx

xxxGIDExxx

प्राजधकार से प्रकाजित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप् ताजहक

WEEKLY

सं. 13]

नई ददल् ली, अप्रैल 6—अप्रैल 12, 2025, िजनवार/चैत्र 16—चैत्र 22, 1947

No. 13]

NEW DELHI, APRIL 6—APRIL 12, 2025, SATURDAY/CHAITRA 16– CHAITRA 22, 1947

इस भाग में जभन् न ृृ्‍ सं्‍ या दी जाती है जजससे दक यह ृृथक संकलन के प ृ में रखा जा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II—खण् ड 3—उृ-खण् ड (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों (रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर) द्वारा जारी दकए गए सांजवजधक आदेि और अजधसूचनाएं

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

जवदेि मन्त्रालय

(सी.ृी.वी. प्रभाग)

नई ददल्ली, 1 अप्रैल, 2025

का.आ. 566.—राजनजयक और कोंसुलीय अजधकारी (िृथ एवं फीस) के अजधजनयम,1948 की धारा 2 के

खंड (क) केअनुसरण में वैधाजनक आदेि ।

एतद् द्वारा, सरकार भारत के महावाजणज्य दूतावास, हो ची जमन्ह जसटी मे^ेँ श्री दीृक यादव, वैयजिक सहायक,

को अप्रैल 01,2025 से सहायक कांसुलर अजधकारी के तौर ृर कांसुलर सेवाओं के जनववहन के जलए प्राजधकृत करती है।

[फा. सं. टी. 4330/01/2025(14)]

एस.आर.एच. फहमी, जनदेिक (सीृीवी)

सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-19042025-262524

CG-DL-W-19042025-262524

1442

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2025/CHAITRA 22, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

(CPV Division)

New Delhi, the 1st April, 2025

S.O. 566.—Statutory Order in pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular

Officers (Oaths and fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1048), the Central Government hereby appoints Mr. Deepak Yadav,

Personal Assistant as Assistant Consular Officer in the Consulate General of India, Ho Chi Minh City, to perform the

consular services as Assistant Consular Officer with effect from April 01, 2025.

[F. No. T. 4330/01/2025(14)]

S.R.H FAHMI, Director (CPV)

नई ददल्ली, 7 अप्रैल, 2025

का.आ. 567.—राजनजयक और कोंसुलीय अजधकारी (िृथ एवं फीस) के अजधजनयम, 1948 की धारा 2 के खंड

(क) के अनुसरण में वैधाजनक आदेि।

एतद्द्वारा, केंद्र सरकार भारतीय उच्चायोग, लंदन में श्री दरवान ससह रावत, कजनष्ठ सजचवालय सहायक,को

अप्रैल 07,2025 से सहायक कांसुलर अजधकारी के प ृ में कांसुलर सेवाओं का जनववहन करने के जलए अजधकृत करती है।

[फा. सं. टी. 4330/01/2025(15)]

एस.आर.एच. फहमी, जनदेिक (सीृीवी)

New Delhi, the 7th April, 2025

S.O. 567.—Statutory Order in pursuance of clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular

Officers (Oaths and fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1048), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Darwan Singh Rawat,

Junior Secretariat Assistant in the High Commission of India, London as Assistant Consular Officer to perform

Consular services with effect from April 07, 2025.

[F. No. T. 4330/01/2025(15)]

S.R.H FAHMI, Director (CPV)

उृभोिा मामले, खाद्य और साववजजनक जवतरण मंत्रालय

(खाद्य और साववजजनक जवतरण जवभाग)

नई ददल्ली, 27 माचव, 2025

का.आ. 568.—केन्द्रीय सरकार राजभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोजनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम, 1976 के जनयम

10 के उृ जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में उृभोिा मामले, खाद्य और साववजजनक जवतरण मंत्रालय (खाद्य और साववजजनक

जवतरण जवभाग) के प्रिासजनक जनयंत्रणाधीन जनम्नजलजखत कायावलयों, जजनके 80 प्रजतित या उससे अजधक कमवचारीवृन्द ने

जहन्दी का कायवसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जलया है, को राजृत्र में अजधसूजचत करती है:-

क्र.सं.

अजधसूजचत दकए जाने वाले कायावलय

भारतीय खाद्य जनगम, मंडल कायावलय, तारनाका

भारतीय खाद्य जनगम, मंडल कायावलय, करीमनगर

भारतीय खाद्य जनगम, मंडल कायावलय, जनज़ामाबाद

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का राजृत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2025, /चैत्र 22, 1947

1443

भारतीय खाद्य जनगम, मंडल कायावलय, नालगोंडा

भारतीय खाद्य जनगम, मंडल कायावलय, वारंगल

[फा. सं. ई-11011/1/2008-सहदी(321924)]

राजेन्द्र कुमार, संयुक् त सजचव

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD & PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Food & Public Distribution)

New Delhi, the 27th March, 2025

S.O. 568.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official purpose of the

Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices under the administrative control of

the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food & Public Distribution (Department of Food & Public Distribution), whereof

80% or more staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:

Sl. No.

Offices to be notified

Food Corporation of India, Divisional Office, Tarnaka

Food Corporation of India, Divisional Office, Karimnagar

Food Corporation of India, Divisional Office, Nizamabad

Food Corporation of India, Divisional Office, Nalgonda

Food Corporation of India, Divisional Office, Warangal

[F. No. E-11011/1/2008-Hindi(321924)]

RAJENDER KUMAR, Jt. Secy.

श्रम और रोजगार मंत्रालय

(जहन्दी अनुभाग)

नई ददल्ली, 25 माचव, 2025

का.आ. 569.—केंद्र सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोजनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम, 1976 (यथा

संिोजधत, 1987) के जनयम 10 के उृ-जनयम (4) के अनुसरण में, श्रम और रोजगार मंत्रालय के प्रिासकीय जनयंत्रणाधीन

जनम्नजलजखत कायावलयों को, जजनके 80 प्रजतित से अजधक कमवचाररयों ने जहन्दी का कायवसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जलया है,

एतद् द्वारा अजधसूजचत करती है:

1. कमवचारी भजव्‍य जनजध संग न, आंचजलक कायावलय, जबहार एवं झारखंड, ृटना

2. कमवचारी भजव्‍य जनजध संग न, आंचजलक कायावलय, केरल एवं लक्षद्वीृ, जतवनवनंतृुरम

3. कमवचारी भजव्‍य जनजध संग न, आंचजलक कायावलय, ओजडिा, भुवनेश्वर

4. कमवचारी भजव्‍य जनजध संग न, आंचजलक कायावलय, आंध्र प्रदेि, जवजयवाडा

5. कमवचारी भजव्‍य जनजध संग न, क्षेत्रीय कायावलय, अलवर

[फा. सं. ई-11016/1/2022-रा.भा.नी]

नागेि कुमार ससह, उृमहाजनदेिक

1444

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2025/CHAITRA 22, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

(Hindi Section)

New Delhi, the 25th March, 2025

S.O. 569.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for official purposes of

the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended, 1987) the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices under the

administrative control of the Ministry of Labour & Employment, more than 80% Staff whereof have acquired

working knowledge of Hindi:-

1. Employees' Provident Fund Organization, Regional Office, Bihar and Jharkhand, Patna

2. Employees' Provident Fund Organization, Regional Office, Kerala and Lakshadweep, Thiruvananthapuram

3. Employees' Provident Fund Organization, Regional Office, Odisha, Bhubaneswar

4. Employees' Provident Fund Organization, Regional Office, Andhra Pradesh, Vijayawada

5. Employees' Provident Fund Organization, Regional Office, Alwar.

[F. No. E-11016/1/2022-RBN]

NAGESH KUMAR SINGH, Dy. Director General

नई ददल्ली, 25 माचव, 2025

का.आ. 570.—केंद्र सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोजनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम, 1976 (यथा

एतद्द्वारा अजधसूजचत करती है:

1. कमवचारी राज्य बीमा जनगम अस्ट्ृताल, रावाभाटा, रायृुर (छत्तीसगढ़)

2. कमवचारी राज्य बीमा जनगम उृ क्षेत्रीय कायावलय, मैसूर, (कनावटक)

[फा. सं. ई-11016/1/2022-रा.भा.नी]

नागेि कुमार ससह, उृमहाजनदेिक

New Delhi, the 25th March, 2025

S.O. 570.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for official purposes of

the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended, 1987) the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices under the

administrative control of the Ministry of Labour & Employment, more than 80% Staff whereof have acquired

working knowledge of Hindi:-

1. Employees' State Insurance Corporation Hospital, Rawabhata, Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Employees' State Insurance Corporation, Sub-Regional Office, Mysuru (Karnataka)

[F. No. E-11016/1/2022-RBN]

NAGESH KUMAR SINGH, Dy. Director General

नई ददल्ली, 25 माचव, 2025

का.आ. 571.—एतद् द्वारा भारत के राजृत्र में प्रकाजित इस मंत्रालय की ददनांक 09 माचव 2022 की समसं्‍यक

अजधसूचना के जहन्दी संस्ट्करण में क्रम सं्‍या 27 एवं 29 में तथा अंग्रेजी संस्ट्करण में क्रम सं्‍या 05, 11, 27 और 29 में

कायावलयों के नाम को जनम्नानुसार ृढ़ा जाए:

क्रम सं्‍या

के जलए

ृढ़ा जाए

27.

कमवचारी भजव्‍य जनजध संग न, क्षेत्रीय कायावलय,

म.प्र एवं छ.ग. भोृाल

कमवचारी भजव्‍य जनजध संग न, आंचजलक कायावलय,

म.प्र एवं छ.ग. भोृाल

29.

कमवचारी भजव्‍य जनजध संग न, क्षेत्रीय कायावलय,

हुब्बल्ली

कमवचारी भजव्‍य जनजध संग न, आंचजलक कायावलय,

हुब्बल्ली

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का राजृत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2025, /चैत्र 22, 1947

1445

क्रम सं्‍या

के जलए

ृढ़ा जाए

Employees‘ Provident Fund Organisation,

Chandigarh

Employees‘ Provident Fund Organisation,

Zonal Office, Chandigarh

Employees‘ Provident Fund Organisation,

Mumbai-II, Thane

Employees‘ Provident Fund Organisation,

Zonal Office, Mumbai-II, Thane

Employees‘ Provident Fund Organisation,

Regional Office, Madhya Pradesh and

Chhattisgarh, Bhopal

Employees‘ Provident Fund Organisation,

Zonal Office, Madhya Pradesh and

Chhattisgarh, Bhopal

Employees‘ Provident Fund Organisation,

Regional Office, Hubli

Employees‘ Provident Fund Organisation,

Zonal Office, Hubli

[फा. सं. ई-11016/1/2022-रा.भा.नी]

नागेि कुमार ससह, उृमहाजनदेिक

New Delhi, the 25th March, 2025

S.O. 571.—In this Ministry‘s notification of even number dated March 9, 2022, published in the Gazette of

India, the names of the offices in the Hindi version in serial numbers 27 and 29, and in the English version in serial

numbers 05, 11, 27, and 29 may be read as follows:

Sr.No.

For:

Read:

27.

कमवचारी भजव्‍य जनजध संग न, क्षेत्रीय कायावलय,

म.प्र एवं छ.ग. भोृाल

कमवचारी भजव्‍य जनजध संग न, आंचजलक कायावलय,

म.प्र एवं छ.ग. भोृाल

29.

कमवचारी भजव्‍य जनजध संग न, क्षेत्रीय कायावलय,

हुब्बल्ली

कमवचारी भजव्‍य जनजध संग न, आंचजलक कायावलय,

हुब्बल्ली

Sr.No.

For:

Read:

Employees‘ Provident Fund Organisation,

Chandigarh

Employees‘ Provident Fund Organisation, Zonal

Office, Chandigarh

Employees‘ Provident Fund Organisation,

Mumbai-II, Thane

Employees‘ Provident Fund Organisation, Zonal

Office, Mumbai-II, Thane

Employees‘ Provident Fund Organisation,

Regional Office, Madhya Pradesh and

Chhattisgarh, Bhopal

Employees‘ Provident Fund Organisation, Zonal

Office, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh,

Bhopal

Employees‘ Provident Fund Organisation,

Regional Office, Hubli

Employees‘ Provident Fund Organisation, Zonal

Office, Hubli

[F. No. E-11016/1/2022-RBN]

NAGESH KUMAR SINGH, Dy. Director General

नई ददल्ली, 3 अप्रैल, 2025

का.आ. 572.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 (a1947 dk 14 ) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj

ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V औद्योजगक

fookn esa औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;

ds iapkV (vkbZ Vh dsl ua a57/1995 lh vkbZ ,l ua 47/2014)

izdkf”kr djrh gSA

[सं. ,y - 12012/130/94- vkbZ vkj (बी-I)]

सलोनी, उृ जनदेिक

1446

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2025/CHAITRA 22, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 3rd April, 2025

S.O. 572.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. IT Case No.57/1995, CIS No. 47/2014) of the Indus.Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of

State Bank of India and their workmen.

[No. L-12012/130/94- IR(B-I)]

SALONI, Dy. Director

Presiding Officer

: Rekha Bhargava, RJS (DJ Cadre)

Central IT Case No.

: 57/1995

CIS No.

: 47/2014

dsUnz ljdkj] Je ea=ky;] ubZ fnYyh dk vkns'k dzekad

,y&12012@130@94& vkbZ-vkj-¼ch&3½ fnukad 28-8-1995

&&&

Hkjr flag] fuoklh& iksLV& djulj] ok;k jsuoky] ftyk& t;iqjA

&&& izkFkhZ

1- 'kk[kk izca/kd] Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad] fla/kh dkWyksuh] cuhikdZ] t;iqjA

&&& vizkFkhZ

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls % Jh vkj- lh- tSu

vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls %

Jh ;'kiky xxZ

Hkkjr ljdkj ds Je ea=ky; dh mijksDr vkKk dzekad ls fuEu vuqlwph dk fookn vf/kfu.kZ; gsrq bl vf/kdj.k

dks izkIr gqvk gS &

―Whether the action of the management of SBI represented through its Branch Manager, Sindhi colony,

Banipark, Jaipur in not accepting the application on 27-6-1991 made by the workman shri Bharat Singh, a

canteen boy/messenger for regular post of sub-staff and thereby his non selection on a post of sub-staff is

proper and valid? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to?‖

izdj.k ntZ fd;k tkdj mHk; i{kksa dks uksfVl tkjh fd;s x;sA izkFkhZ dh vksj ls fnukad 20-4-1998 dks LVsVesaV

vkWQ Dyse is'k dj vfHkdFku fd;k fd izkFkhZ dh fu;qfDr foi{kh ds v/khu fnukad 1-2-84 dks dsUVhu ckW; ds :i esa gqbZ

FkhA izkFkhZ us foi{kh ds v/khu 13-2-88 rd fujUrj dk;Z fd;kA bl vof/k esa izkFkhZ ls le;≤ ij lans'kokgd dk dk;Z

Hkh fy;k x;kA izkFkhZ dks fnukad 14-2-88 dks lsokeqDr dj fn;k x;kA izkFkhZ }kjk viuh lsokeqfDr ds laca/k esa ml le;

dksbZ fookn ugha mBk;k x;kA vizkFkhZ cSad rFkk vkWy bf.M;k LVsV cSad vkWQ bf.M;k LVkQ QSMjs'ku ds chp fnukad

27-10-88 dks ,d le>kSrk gqvkA bl le>kSrs ds vuqlkj v/khuLFk Js.kh ds nSfud osruHkksxh etnwjksa dh lans'kokgd@

QjkZ'k@dsl dqyh@Lohij@xkMZ vkfn dh iw.kZdkfyd ;k va'kdkfyd fjfDr;ksa ij LFkkbZ fu;qfDr fn;s tkus dk volj

fn;k tkuk FkkA bl le>kSrs ds vuq:i dkfeZd izca/kd] Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad] ubZ fnYyh }kjk tLFkku if=dk esa fnukad

1-5-91 dks foKkiu izdkf'kr dj ik= mEehnokjksa ls vkosnu i= ekaxs x;sA izkFkhZ }kjk viuk vkosnu vizkFkhZ dks fn;s tkus

ds ckotwn vkxs vxzsf"kr ugha fd;k x;k vkSj izkFkhZ dk vkosnu ;g dgrs gq;s ykSVk fn;k fd og izkFkZuk i= izLrqr djus

gsrq ik= ugha gSA tcfd izLrqr foKkiu fnukad 1-5-91 esa dSUVhu ckW; ftudh lsok,a eSlsatj ds :i esa yh xbZ] ik= ugha

gksxs] bl laca/k esa dksbZ mYys[k ugha FkkA cSad }kjk fnukad 15-6-91 ds Li"Vhdj.k esa dSaVhu ckW; ftUgksaus eSalstsj ds :i esa

dk;Z fd;k gks] ds vkosnu Hkh vxzsf"kr djus ds funsZ'k fn;s tkus ij Hkh izkFkhZ dk vkosnu vxzsf"kr ugha fd;k x;kA ftlls

izkFhkZ dks lk{kkRdkj esa ugha cqyk;k x;k vkSj izkFkhZ ls twfu;jksa dk p;u dj fy;k x;kA var esa izkFkhZ }kjk mldk izkFkZuk

i= vxzsf"kr ugha fd;k tkuk iw.kZr;k vuqfpr ,oa voS/k gksus rFkk izkFkhZ dks p;fur fd;s tkus rFkk mlh frfFk ls lc

LVkQ ds :i esa fu;qfDr ikus dk vf/kdkjh ?kksf"kr djus rFkk leLr vkfFkZd o vU; ykHk fnyk;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh gSA

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का राजृत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2025, /चैत्र 22, 1947

1447

vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls tokc izLrqr dj izkjfEHkd vkifRr djrs gq;s dFku fd;k gS fd izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr fookn

vkS|ksfxd fokn vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr ugha vkrk gSA izkFkhZ dk foi{kh cSad ls deZdkj o fu;kstd dk laca/k ugha gSA izkFkhZ

vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2¼3½ ds vUrxZr deZdkj ugha gSA xq.kkox.k ij dFku fd;k gS fd izkFkhZ Jfed dh dHkh Hkh foi{kh cSad

esa dSaVhu ckW; ds :i esa fu;qfDr ugha gqbZ FkhA izkFkhZ }kjk dHkh Hkh foi{kh cSad esa fnukad 1-2-84 ls 13-2-88 rd fdlh izdkj

dk dksbZ lans'kokgd vFkok vU; dk;Z ugha fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ dh fu;qfDr LFkkuh; dk;kZUo;u lfefr }kjk dh xbZ Fkh] ftl

ij foi{kh cSad dk dksbZ fu;a=.k ugha gksrk gSA izkFkhZ }kjk dsUVhu ckW; ds :i esa lfefr ds lnL;ksa@cSad

deZpkfj;ksa@vkxarqdksa ds fy;s pk; cukus] lIykbZ djus vkfn dk dke fd;k tkrk Fkk] ftldk Hkqxrku lfefr }kjk izkFkhZ

dks vnk fd;k tkrk FkkA izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr fookn vf/kfu;e ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr pyus ;ksX; ugha gSA foi{kh cSad o

vkWy bf.M;k LVsV cSad vkWQ bf.M;k LVkQ QSMjs’ku ds e/; gqvk le>kSrk izkFkhZ ij ykxw ugha gksrk gS D;ksafd izkFkhZ }kjk

dHkh Hkh foi{kh cSad esa dSaVhu ckW; rFkk lans’k okgd dk dk;Z ugha fd;k x;kA foi{kh cSad }kjk mDr le>kSrs ds rgr ftu

va'kdkyhu] iw.kZdkfyd] nSfud etnwj ftUgksaus 1 dys.Mj o"kZ esa 240 fnol vkSj fnukad 31-7-88 rd 36 dys.Mj eghuksa esa

270 fnol ;k dys.Mj o"kZ esa 30 fnu dh dqy vLFkkbZ lsok ;k 1-7-75 ds ckn vkSj 31-7-88 rd 36 dys.Mj eghuksa esa de

ls de 70 fnu dh vLFkkbZ lsok dh gks] dks gh cSad fu;qfDr ds fy;s ik= ekurs gq;s vkosnu ekaxs x;s FksA izkFkhZ o foi{kh

cSad ds e/; deZdkj fu;sktd dk laca/k ugha FkkA var esa izkFkhZ dk Dyse [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh gSA

izkFkhZ Jfed dks lk{; gsrq dbZ volj fn;s x;s fdUrq izkFkhZ dh vksj ls dksbZ lk{; is'k ugha djus ij vkns'k

fnukad 17-10-2024 dks izkFkhZ dh lk{; can dh xbZA vizkFkhZ }kjk Hkh izkFkhZ dh vksj ls dksbZ lk{; is'k ugha gksus ds dkj.k

dksbZ lk{; is’k ugha djus ij lk{; vizkFkhZ can dh xbZA

mHk; i{kksa dh cgl lquh xbZA izkFkhZ dh vksj ls fo}ku izfrfuf/k }kjk cgl dh xbZ gS fd izkFkhZ ls foi{kh cSad

}kjk dSaVhu ckW; rFkk lans'kokgd ds :i esa dk;Z fy;s tkus ds ckotwn Hkh foi{kh cSad o vkWy bf.M;k LVsV cSad vkWQ

bf.M;k LVkQ QSMjs'ku ds e/; gqvk le>kSrk ds rgr izkFkhZ ls fu;qfDr gsrq vkosnu fn;s tkus ds ckotwn izkFkhZ dk vkosnu

vxzsf"kr ugha fd;k x;k ftlls izkFkhZ dks lk{kkRdkj gsrq ugha cqyk;k x;k vkSj izkFkhZ ls dfu"B Jfedksa dks foi{kh cSad }kjk

fu;qfDr nh xbZ] tks vuqfpr ,oa voS/k gSA vr% izkFkhZ dks vU; twfu;j Jfedksa ds leku fu;qfDr nh tkdj lsok laca/kh lHkh

vkfFkZd ykHk e; ,fj;j fnyk;s tkosaA

blds foijhr vizkFkhZ cSad ds fo}ku izfrfuf/k }kjk cgl dh xbZ gS fd izkFkhZ o foi{kh cSad ds e/;

deZdkj&fu;kstd dk laca/k ugha jgk gSA izkFkhZ dks dHkh Hkh foi{kh cSad }kjk fu;qfDr ugha nh xbZA dfFkr le>kSrk Hkh izkFkhZ

ij ykxw ugha gksrk gSA izkFkhZ }kjk vius Dyse ds leFkZu esa dksbZ lk{; is'k ugha dh gSA vr% Dyse [kkfjt fd;k tkosA

eSaus mHk; i{kksa }kjk fn;s x;s rdksZa ij euu fd;kA i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu o v/;;u fd;k x;kA

i=koyh ds voyksdu ls ik;k fd izkFkhZ }kjk Lo;a dh fu;qfDr foi{kh cSad dh dSaVhu esa dSaVhu ckW; ds :i esa gksus rFkk

mlls lans’k okgd dk dk;Z fd;s tkuk vius Dyse esa crk;k gS] ysfdu bl laca/k esa ,slk dksbZ nLrkost is’k ugha gqvk gS

ftlls ;g lkfcr gks lds fd izkFkhZ dh fu;qfDr foi{kh cSad }kjk dh xbZ gks rFkk izkFkhZ }kjk foi{kh cSad esa dk;Z fd;k x;k

gksA izkFkhZ }kjk vius LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse ds leFkZu esa dksbZ ekSf[kd ,oa nLrkosth lk{; is'k ugha dh xbZ gSA izkFkhZ }kjk

foi{kh cSad esa fu;qfDr gksus] mlds }kjk dSaVhu ckW; ds :i esa dk;Z fd;s tkus] lans’kokgd dk dk;Z fd;s tkus vkfn ds

laca/k esa dksbZ Hkh nLrkost Hkh is'k ugha fd;k x;k gSA izkFhkZ }kjk tks fookn mBk;k x;k gS] mldk fu.kZ; lk{; ds vk/kkj

ij fd;k tkuk gS ysfdu izkFkhZ dh vksj ls vius LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse ds leFkZu esa dksbZ lk{; is'k ugha dh xbZ gSA

vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds izko/kkuksa ds rgr LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse esa of.kZr rF;ksa dks fl) djus dk Hkkj Lo;a izkFkhZ

Jfed ij Fkk ysfdu izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse ds leFkZu esa dksbZ lk{; is'k ugha dh xbZ gSA vr% izkFkhZ

}kjk izLrqr LVsVesaV vkWQ Dyse Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha gSA izkFkhZ lk{; ds vHkko esa dksbZ jkgr ikus dk vf/kdkjh ugha

jg tkrk gSA fu"d"kZr% izdj.k esa fuEu vokMZ ikfjr fd;k tkrk gS &

The action of the management of SBI represented through its Branch Manager, Sindhi colony, Banipark,

Jaipur in not accepting the application on 27-6-1991 made by the workman shri Bharat Singh, a canteen

boy/messenger for regular post of sub-staff and thereby his non selection on a post of sub-staff is proper and

valid. The workman is not entitled to get any relief.‖

jSQjsal rnuqlkj mRrfjr fd;k tkrk gSA

js[kk HkkxZo] U;k;k/kh'k

vf/kfu.kZ; vkt fnukad 12-11-2024 dks [kqys U;k;ky; esa fy[kk;k tkdj lquk;k x;k tks dsUnz ljdkj dks

izdk”kukFkZ fu;ekuqlkj Hkstk tkosA

1448

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2025/CHAITRA 22, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नई ददल्ली, 7 अप्रैल, 2025

का.आ. 573.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 (a1947 dk 14 ) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

ईस्ट्ट कॉस्ट्ट रेलवे ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V औद्योजगक fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; भुवनेश्वर ds iapkV (03/2020)izdkf”kr djrh

[सं. ,y - 41011/42/2019- vkbZ vkj (बी-I)]

सलोनी, उृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 7th April, 2025

S.O. 573.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref.03/2020) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of East Cost

Railway their workmen.

[No. L-41011/42/2019- IR(B-I)]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR

Present:

Sri Dinesh Kumar Singh,

Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour Court,

Bhubaneswar.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 03/2020

Date of Passing Order – 28^th October, 2024

Between :-

The Managing Director,

M/s. Commando Security Services, Plot No. 588,

Sahidnagar, Bhubaneswar (Orissa) – 751 007.

Sr. DME, E. Co., Railway Jatni Khurda Road,

Khurda (Orissa) – 752 050.

The Managing Director,

M/s. Oriental Security Service, Plot No. 588,

Sahidnagar, Bhubaneswar (Orissa) – 751 007

…

1^st Party-Managements.

(And)

General Secretary,

East Coast Railway Contract Shramik Union (CITU),

Dakbunglow Road, Jatni – 752 050.

…

2^nd Party-Union.

Appearances:

None.

…

For the 1^st Party-Managements.

None.

…

For the 2^nd Party-Union.

ORDER

In the present case, a reference was received from the Section Officer to the Government of India, Ministry

of Labour & Employment, New Delhi vide order No. L-41011/42/2019 – IR(B-I), dated 23.12.2019 under clause (d)

of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for adjudication of a

dispute, under the following schedule:-

―Whether the action of the management of M/s. Commando Security Service and M/s. Oriental Security

Service, Contractor of East Coast Railway, Khurda Road in denying payment of bonus to his workers

for the financial year 2017-18 is legal and/or justified? If not what relief the workmen are entitled to?

In the reference order, the Under Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment,

New Delhi commanded the parties raising the dispute to file statement of claim, complete with relevant documents,

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का राजृत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2025, /चैत्र 22, 1947

1449

list of reliance and witnesses with this Tribunal within 15 days of receipt of the reference order and to forward a copy

of such statement of claim to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

Despite directions so given, no statement of claim is received from the 2^nd party-workmen.

On receipt of the above reference, notice was sent to the 2^nd Party-workmen on 24.03.2020 and on dated

05.09.2023 for appearance and for filing of statement of claim. Neither the postal article sent to the 2^nd Party-

Workmen, referred to above, was received back nor was it observed by the Tribunal that postal services remained

unserved in the period, referred to above. Therefore, every presumption lies in favour of the fact that the above

notices were served upon the 2^nd Party-Workmen. Despite service of the notice, the 2^nd Party-Workmen opted to

abstain away from the proceedings. No claim statement was filed on its behalf. Thus, it is clear that the 2^nd Party-

Workmen is not interested in adjudication of the reference on merits.

Since the 2^nd Party-Workmen has neither filed statement of claim nor has led any evidence so as to prove its

cause against the Management, it is presumed that there is no claim of workman against the Management.

In view of such, no claim Order is passed by this Tribunal.

Let this order be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947, for publication.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

DINESH KUMAR SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई ददल्ली, 7 अप्रैल, 2025

का.आ. 574.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 (a1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

इनोवसोसव सर्ववस प्राइवेट जलजमटेड ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V औद्योजगक

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; भुवनेश्वर ds iapkV (a06/2021) izdkf'kr djrh gSA

[सं. ,y - 12025/01/2025- vkbZ vkj (ch-I)-47]

सलोनी, उृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 7th April, 2025

S.O. 574.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 06/2021) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Innovsource

Service Pvt. Ltd their workmen.

[No. L-12025/01/2025- IR(B-I)-47]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR

Present:

Sri Dinesh Kumar Singh,

Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour Court,

Bhubaneswar.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 06/2021

Date of Passing Order – 25^th November, 2024

Between:

The Chief Executive Officer, (Mr. Manish Kumar),

INNOV, A-3, Kailash Industrial Complex, Park Site,

Vikhota (W), Mumbai – 400 079.

1450

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2025/CHAITRA 22, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

The Managing Director & CEO, SBI Card rep,

DLF Infinity Tower-C, 12^th Floor, Block-II,

Building – 3, DLF Cyber City, Gurgaon – 122 002, Haryana.

Innovsource Services Pvt. Ltd., A/410, 3^rd Floor,

Metro House, Vani Vihar, Bhubaneswar – 751 007.

…

1^st Party-Managements.

(And)

Sri Prasanta Kumar Pradhan, S/o Kasinath Pradhan,

Vill/PO. Nilabasanta, Puri – 752 016

…

2^nd Party-Workman.

Appearances:

None.

…

For the 1^st Party-Managements.

None.

…

For the 2^nd Party-Workman.

ORDER

In the present case, a reference was received from the office of the Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner

(Central), Bhubaneswar vide order No. 8(57)/2020-B.II/Adj/2021-B.I, dated 9^th February, 2021 under clause (d) of

sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for adjudication of a dispute,

under the following schedule:-

―Whether the termination of service of workman Shri Prasanta Kumar Pradhan by the contractor

Innovsource Services P Ltd., violating Section -25 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and/or

justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?

In the reference order, the Deputy chief Labour Commissioner (Central), Bhubaneswar commanded the

parties raising the dispute to file statement of claim, complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses

with this Tribunal within 15 days of receipt of the reference order and to forward a copy of such statement of claim to

each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

Despite directions so given, no statement of claim is received from the 2^nd party-workman.

On receipt of the above reference, notice was sent to the 2^nd Party-Workman on 20.12.2021 and on dated

08.01.2024 for appearance and for filing of statement of claim. Neither the postal article sent to the 2^nd Party-

Workman, referred to above, was received back nor was it observed by the Tribunal that postal services remained

unserved in the period, referred to above. Therefore, every presumption lies in favour of the fact that the above

notices were served upon the 2^nd Party-Workman. Despite service of the notice, the 2^nd Party-Workman opted to

abstain away from the proceedings. No claim statement was filed on its behalf. Thus, it is clear that the 2^nd Party-

Workman is not interested in adjudication of the reference on merits.

Since the 2^nd Party-Workman has neither filed statement of claim nor has led any evidence so as to prove its

cause against the Management, it is presumed that there is no claim of workman against the Management.

In view of such, no claim Order is passed by this Tribunal.

Let this order be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947, for publication.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

DINESH KUMAR SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई ददल्ली, 7 अप्रैल, 2025

का.आ. 575.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (a1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdkas vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V औद्योजगक fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; भुवनेश्वर ds iapkV (a53/2023) izdkf”kr djrh gSA

[सं. ,y -12025/01/2025- vkbZ vkj (ch-I)-49]

सलोनी, उृ जनदेिक

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का राजृत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2025, /चैत्र 22, 1947

1451

New Delhi, the 7th April, 2025

S.O. 575.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 53/2023) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of

India their workmen.

[No. L-12025/01/2025- IR(B-I)-49]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR

Present:

Sri Dinesh Kumar Singh,

Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour Court,

Bhubaneswar.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 53/2023

Date of Passing Order – 24^th December, 2024

Between :-

1. M/s. Oriental Security Service,

Plot No. 418, At./PO./P.S. Saheed Nagar,

Bhubaneswar, Distt. Khordha.

2. The Deputy General Manager,

State Bank of India, Qrs. No. 177,

Unit – 1, P.S. Capital, Bhubaneswar,

Distt. Khordha.

…

1^st Party-Managements.

(And)

Sri Prakash Nayak,

Son of Muralidhar Nayak,

At. Utkal University Campous,

P.S. Saheed Nagar, Bhubaneswar.

…

Applicant-Workman.

Appearances:

None.

…

For the 1^st Party-Managements.

Sri Prakash Nayak.

…

For the Applicant-Workman.

ORDER

The applicant-workman has filed an application under section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act (herein-

after referred as an act).

The case of the applicant-workman as per his statement of claim is as follows:-

That he was initially appointed in House Keeping in the year 2000 by the contractor for the Management

No. 2 on monthly salary of Rs. 900/- and he was discharging his work satisfactorily. However, the Management

No. 1 retrenched him from service which was illegal and not as per the provisions of the I.D. Act. The Management

No. 1 had neither issued notice of retrenchment nor paid wages of notice period. After retrenchment he had raised a

dispute before the labour machinery and as the matter was not resolved he filed the present application invoking the

amended provisions of 2-A(2) of the I.D. Act.

1452

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2025/CHAITRA 22, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

He has prayed for a direction to the Management No. 2 for his reengagement.

When the case is at the stage of appearance and for filing of written statement by the Managements, the

applicant-workman has filed a petition to withdraw the case as he has amicably settled the case with the Opp. Party

No. 1.

As the applicant-workman has filed a petition to withdraw the case and he does not want to proceed with the

case the present I.D. Case is dismissed with-drawn.

Order is passed accordingly.

A copy of this Order is sent to the appropriate government for notification as required under section 17 of the

I.D. Act, 1947. File is consigned to record room.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

DINESH KUMAR SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई ददल्ली, 7 अप्रैल, 2025

का.आ. 576.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (a1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V औद्योजगक fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; भुवनेश्वर ds iapkV (a41/2014) izdkf”kr djrh gSA

[सं. ,y -12025/01/2025- vkbZ vkj (ch-I)-48]

सलोनी, उृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 7th April, 2025

S.O. 576.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 41/2014) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of

India their workmen.

[No. L-12025/01/2025- IR(B-I)-48]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR.

Present :

Sri Dinesh Kumar Singh,

Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court,

Bhubaneswar.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 41/2014

Date of Passing Award – 4^th November, 2024

Between :

1. The Managing Director,

State Bank of India, State Bank Bhawan,

8^th Floor, Madame Cama Marg, Mumbai – 400 021.

2. The Branch Manager,

S.M.E. Branch, State Bank of India, Ground Floor,

Sambalpur – 768 001.

…

1^st Party-Managements.

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का राजृत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2025, /चैत्र 22, 1947

1453

(And)

Sri Kundan Luha, aged about 35 years,

S/o Muna Luha, at – Pension Para,

P.O./Distt. Sambalpur – 768 001.

…

2^nd Party-Workman

Appearances:

Sri Subrat Mishra, Advocate.

…

For the 1^st Party-Managements

Sri Sasanka Sahoo, Advocate.

…

For the 2^nd Party-workman

AWARD

The Award is directed against an application filed by one Sri Kundan Luha under section 2-A(2) of the

I.D. Act against the order of disengagement issued by the Branch Manager, S.M.E. Branch, Sambalpur.

It is required to mention here that this Tribunal had passed an award on dated 30.10.2019 with a direction to

the management to reinstate the workman with full back wages within three months from the date of receipt of the

notification failing which he is entitled to receive bank rate of interest of Fixed Deposit from the date of the Award.

Being aggrieved by the orders of this Tribunal the 1^st party-Management State Bank of India has preferred a

W.P.(C) No. 18071/2020 before the Hon‘ble High Court of Orissa and the Hon‘ble High Court of Orissa has been

pleased to set aside the award with a direction to the Tribunal to ascertain the fact; number of employees working in

S.M.E. Branch of the Bank at Sambalpur as on date of retrenchment (30.10.2010). The Hon‘ble High Court of

Orissa has further been pleased to direct the Tribunal that upon finding the fact the Tribunal will then proceed to

adjudicate on the allegation regarding violation of Section 25-N and for that purpose the parties may adduce further

evidence.

Now in the light of the direction of the Hon‘ble High Court of Orissa the case is restored to original file and

both the parties were directed to adduce evidence, if any.

The case of the 2^nd party-workman as per his statement of claim in brief is as follows:-

That he was working as a Sweeper in the Commercial Branch State Bank of India Sambalpur (now renamed

as SME Branch) since 11.07.1997 to 30.10.2010 continuously. Initially he was being paid his monthly wages through

vouchers from 11.07.1997 to January, 1998 but later on he was engaged on daily wage basis from September, 2002 to

30.10.2020 and he was paid wages terming as 1/3^rd of the admissible salary. He had been paid his last salary of

Rs. 2957/- during October, 2010. He was also paid Bonus by the Management during the said period in the month of

30.10.2010. However, the Chief Manager, State Bank of India (Commercial Branch), Sambalpur illegally passed an

order to discontinue his service and he was paid compensation of Rs. 19,221/- and Rs. 2957/- as notice pay also

through cheques. The Bank has not obtained any prior approval for retrenching him from service as contemplated

under the I.D. Act, 1947 and as such the disengagement notice dated 30.10.2010 is nonest in the eye of law. Further

principles of ―last in, first out‖ have also not been followed by the 1^st Party-Management and the payment of

retrenchment compensation amount is not proper.

A prayer has been made by the 2^nd party-workman to declare his termination from service vide order dated

30.10.2010 as illegal and to regularize his service by the Management under the designation General Attendant with

effect from 1.4.2006 with all back wages and consequential benefits.

On the other hand the case of the 1^st Party-Management-SBI SME Branch Sambalpur as per its written

statement is as follows:-

That, the 2^nd party-workman was engaged intermittently on temporary/daily wage basis as a Sweeper due to

exigencies of work in the branch and the workman used to sweep the branch premises by working to two to three

hours for sweeping purposes for which he was paid his wages for the job done by him. He was never

appointed/recruited in the Bank by following due process of rules of appointment as all the appointment in the Banks

are made by following due process of rules for time. The services of the workman was no more required by the

Branch, so with effect from 30.10.2010 after following due process of law i.e. the payment of necessary retrenchment

compensation and payment in lieu of notice as per the provisions provided under Section 25-F of the Industrial

Disputes Act he was disengaged from service. The Management had paid Rs. 19,221/- as compensation and Rs.

2957/- as notice pay to the workman through Bank Cheque. Moreover, engagement of workman was purely

temporary and casual in nature, so the workman has no vested right to be continued in the said Bank. He was

discontinued from service after compliance of the provisions of the I.D Act by paying compensation and notice pay in

lieu of notice and the same was received by him which amounts to acceptance of the disengagement by the Bank. The

workman is not at all entitled to be regularized in the Bank under law.

1454

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2025/CHAITRA 22, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

A prayer has been made to dismiss the claim of the workman.

The 2^nd party-workman has filed rejoinder to the written statement filed by the 1^st Party-Management

denying all the averments made by the 1^st Party-Management.

As per the direction of the Hon‘ble High Court of Orissa both the parties were directed to adduce their

further witness, if any, and on such direction the learned lawyer of the concerned workman has filed a petition for re-

cross examination of M.W. No. 1 Prasenjeet Hota which was allowed and he was re-cross examined Further, on the

request of the 2^ndparty-workman the Management has produced following documents,

1. Photocopies of the attendance register from 25.10.2010 to 31.10.2010 of the employees working at the

S.M.E. Branch, Sambalpur.

2. Employees position of SME branch, Sambalpur as on 30.10.2010.

FINDINGS

Now the only point of determination as per the direction of the Hon‘ble High Court of Orissa is to ascertain

the fact about the number of employees working in S.M.E. Branch of the Bank at Sambalpur as on the date of

retrenchment i.e. (30.10.2010) and upon finding the fact to adjudicate the allegation regarding violation of

Section 25-N of the Industrial Disputes Act.

10.

The Tribunal thinks it proper to discuss the oral and documentary evidences available in the case.

11.

In the re-cross examination of M.W-1, Prasenjeet Hota, he has stated that he was appointed as Chief

Manager in S.M.E. Branch of Sambalpur on 10.10.2016 and the concerned workman was not working in the Bank of

S.M.E. branch from the year 2010. He has also stated that the S.M.E. branch, Sambalpur comes under the control and

supervision of Regional Office, Sambalpur and Regional Office, Sambalpur comes under the control of Zonal Office.

He has denied the suggestion that the daily wages initially appointed under the Management Bank were subsequently

absorbed in the permanent cadre. He has also deposed that he has no knowledge regarding Suresh Singh, SBI

Evening Branch, Sambalpur, Sri Munu Lal at SBI Multi Gundarpur Branch, Sambalpour, Sri Hiralal Bhoi, SBI

Budharaja Branch, Sri Madhab Kollet\, at SBI Daily market evening branch, Rourkela, Sri Nilamadhab Dehury at SBI

Khetrajpur and others were working as sweepers and were getting salary of 1/3^rd and subsequently made permanent

under the management of State Bank of India. He has also deposed that he has no Knowledge that Madhab Kalet has

been made permanent at Rourkela Branch of State Bank of India.

12.

Now coming to the documents produced by the Management it appears that the employee position of S.M.E.

Branch of S.B.I., Sambalpur on 30.10.2010 are as follows.

Number of Officers

–

Number of Clerical Staff

–

Number of Sub Staff

–

Number of Daily wager

–

----------------------

Total - 16

-----------------------

13.

The Management has also produced the photocopy of the attendance register mentioning the names of only

11 employees. Further the Management has produced a letter of S.M.E. Branch of Sambalpur mentioning that

S.B.I Sambalpur was not maintaining the attendance register for the daily wage workers during the relevant period.

14.

Now coming to the additional list of documents filed by the 2^nd party-workman it appears that the Branch

Manager Daily Market, Rourkela had forwarded the application of Shri Kaleth for his consideration of his case as full

time employee. Further it appears that, the A.G.M. Sambalpur had called for the Bio Data of Sri Kaleth vide letter

dated 3.2.2001 and subsequently the Branch Manager Daily Market, Rourkela vide letter dated 17.2.2001 had sent the

Bio Data and copy of the service record vide letter dated 30.03.2006. Further Shri Kaleth was made permanent.

15.

After going through the oral and documentary evidence produced by both the parties it appears that in the

S.M.E. Branch there were only sixteen employees working as on 30.10.2010 as per the documents produced by the

1^st Party-Management. Moreover, the 2^nd party-workman has not produced any documents or list of employees to

show that more than 900 employees were working in the S.M.E. Branch of Sambalpur. However, the documents

produced by the 2^nd Party-workman show only with regard to making the workman Sri Kaleth from temporary part

time sweeper to permanent full time employee and nothing more than that.

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का राजृत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2025, /चैत्र 22, 1947

1455

16.

At this stage it is relevant to mention here that the concerned workman had already been paid Rs. 2957/- as

notice pay of one month and Rs. 19221/- as compensation, so the 1^st Party-Management has already complied with

the provisions of Section 25-F of the Act.

17.

Now in this case it has already been held by this Tribunal that the 1^st Party-Management has only sixteen

employees working in the SME Branch, Sambalpur, so there is no violation of Section 25-N of the Industrial Disputes

Act and the 1^st Party-Management had already paid the notice pay and compensation so there is no violation of

Section 25-F of the I.D. Act.

18.

In view of above discussions, the Tribunal is of the opinion that at the relevant time i.e. on 30.10.2010 there

were only sixteen employees working in the S.M.E. Branch, Sambalpur and as such there is no violation of Section

25-N of the I.D. Act. Further, the 1^st Party-Management had already paid the notice pay and compensation so there is

no violation of Section 25-F of the I.D. Act.

18.

After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal finds and holds that there is no

illegality in terminating/disengaging the services of the 2^nd party-workman by the 1^st Party-Management and

consequently 2^nd party-workman is not entitled to any relief.

19.

This is the award of this Tribunal.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

DINESH KUMAR SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई ददल्ली, 7 अप्रैल, 2025

का.आ. 577.—औद्योजगक जववाद अजधजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय

सरकार प्रबंधक, मैससव सहकार ग्लोबल जलजमटेड, मोटो, खुदाव; ृररयोजना जनदेिक, भारतीय राष्ट्रीय राजमागव प्राजधकरण,

नयाृल्ली, भुवनेश्वर, के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोजकों और श्री जचतरंजन दास, कामगार, के बीच अनुबंध में जनर्ददष्ट

औद्योजगक जववाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजधकरण

भुवनेश्वर ृंचाट (संदभव सं्‍या 25/2018)

को जैसा दक अनुलग्नक में ददखाया गया है, प्रकाजित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉृी के साथ 07.04.2025

को प्राप्त हुआ था l

[सं. ,y - 42025-07-2025-80-vkbZ vkj (डीयू)]

ददलीृ कुमार, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 7th April, 2025

S.O. 577.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 25/2018) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum

Labour–Bhubaneswar, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to The

Manager, M/s. Sahakar Global Ltd., Motto, Khurda; The Project Director, National Highways Authority of

India, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar, and Shri Chitaranjan Das, Worker, which was received along with soft copy of

the award by the Central Government on 07.04.2025.

[No. L-42025-07-2025-80- IR (DU]

DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR

Present:

Sri Dinesh Kumar Singh,

Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour Court,

Bhubaneswar.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 25/2018

Filed under Section 2-A(2) of the I.D. Act

Date of Passing Order – 29^th October, 2024

1456

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2025/CHAITRA 22, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Between :-

Sri Chitaranjan Das,

At Baligadia, P.S./P.S. Jankia,

Distt. Khurda.

…

Applicant-Workman.

(And)

1. The Manager, M/s. Sahakar Global Ltd.,

At. Godipada Tool Plaza, P.O. Motto,

P.S. Jankia, Distt. Khurda – 752 020.

2. The Project Director,

National Highway Authority of India,

Setu Bhawan, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar.

…

1^st Party-Managements.

Appearances:

Sri Chitaranjan Das.

…

For Himself the

Applicant.

Sri Sajjal Kumar Bose.

…

For the Management No. 1

None

For the Mgt. No. 2 & 3.

ORDER

This is an application of applicant-workman filed under section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act (herein-

after referred as an ―Act‖).

The case of the 2^nd party-workman in brief is as follows:-

That, the 2^nd Party-Workman, Sri Chitaranjan Das was engaged as Tool Fees Collector under the

Management No. 2 through different contractors from 08.11.2014 and continued to work till 13.05.2017 continuously

and uninterruptedly. He was receiving Rs. 9,300/- as wages per months which was less than the Minimum wages

fixed by the Government of India from time to time. After extending such a long period of service to the

managements, they (Management) suddenly terminated his services with effect from 13.05.2017 without paying any

terminal benefits such as retrenchment benefits and notice pay, in an illegal, unjustified and arbitrary manner adopting

unfair labour practice. The Managements have not followed the provisions of Section 25-F, 25-G and 25-H of the Act

while refusing employment to the workman which is illegal, unfair and unjust.

The 2^nd Party-Workmen raised the dispute before the conciliation authorities to get his legitimate claim and

on completion of statutory 45 days of conciliation proceeding the 2^nd party-workman has filed statement of claim

invoking amended act under section 2-A(2) of the I.D. Act for adjudication.

The 2^nd party-workman has prayed to pass an award in his favour.

On the other hand, Management No. 2 has appeared and filed written statement rebutting the stand taken by

the 2^nd party-workmen.

The case of the 1^st Party-management No. 2 is that the 2^nd party-workman was not engaged by the

Management No. 2 rather he was engaged by the Management No. 1 - the agency for collection of toll fees at

different toll gates are selected through open tender. Engagement of workmen are within the domain of the agency

concerned. The only responsibility of the Management No. 2 to see that the workers engaged by the Management

No. 1 are paid minimum wages and EPF dues and ESI deductions. The Collecting Agent is engaged through open

tender for a period of one year and person engaged by the collection agency are to continue till continuance of the

agreement with the agency and the Management no. 2 is no connected with the terms and conditions of engagement

of that person by the agency.

The Management No. 2 has prayed to reject/dismiss the application filed by the applicant and to pass an

order in their favour.

Further the Managements No. 1 (M/s. Sahakar Global Ltd.) initially neither appeared nor filed its Written

Statement in this case in spite of several opportunities given to it. Due to non-appearance of the Management No. 1

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का राजृत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2025, /चैत्र 22, 1947

1457

order of setting exparte was passed against it on 6.6.2018. Thereafter, the Management no. 1 has moved a petition for

recall the order of exparte passed against it and the said petition was allowed on 29.01.2024.

However, during the course of adjudication, both the 2^nd Party-Workman and the 1^st Party-Management No.

1 have settled the present dispute out of court and filed original copy of their Memorandum of Settlement in Form – H

containing certain terms & conditions as agreed between them in this dispute. Submitting their Memorandum of

Settlement, both parties have prayed the Tribunal to close this case in terms of the settlement arrived at between them.

The terms of Memorandum of Settlement executed between Sri Chitaranjan Das (2^nd Party Workman) and Sri Sajal

Kumar Bose (Authorised representative of the 1^st Party Management No. 1 are as under.

―1. It is agreed between the parties that the workman shall withdraw the present I.D. Case against the

Contractor Management No. 1 upon receipt of a sum of Rs. 80,000/- (Rupees Eighty Thousand only) as full

and final settlement.

2. The workman affirms and acknowledges the receipt of the payment of Rs. 80,000/- and agrees to withdraw

the present proceedings. He was also expressly waives any and all future claims or demands against the

contractor, Management no. 1

3. The settlement is reached out of good will and volition of parties.‖

Considering the facts and circumstance and the submissions of the stake holders of this case, the Tribunal is

of the opinion that whatever dispute was existing between the 2^nd Party-Workmen and the 1^st Party-Managements, the

same have already been settled and no further adjudication is required under the Act.

Hence this Order is passed in terms of the Memorandum of Settlement arrived at between the 2^nd Party-

Workman and the 1^st Party-Management No. 1. The Memorandum of Settlement filed by the parties in this case

forms part of the order.

This is the Order of this Tribunal.

Dictated & Corrected by me.

DINESH KUMAR SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई ददल्ली, 7 अप्रैल, 2025

का.आ. 578.—औद्योजगक जववाद अजधजनयम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय

नयाृल्ली, भुवनेश्वर, के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध जनयोजकों और श्री हाददबंधु अररसल, कामगार,के बीच अनुबंध में जनर्ददष्ट

औद्योजगक जववाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योजगक अजधकरण

भुवनेश्वर ृंचाट (संदभव

सं्‍या 26/2018) को जैसा दक अनुलग्नक में ददखाया गया है, प्रकाजित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को सॉफ्ट कॉृी के

साथ 07.04.2025 को प्राप्त हुआ था l

[सं. ,y - 42025-07-2025-81-vkbZ vkj (डीयू)]

ददलीृ कुमार, अवर सजचव

New Delhi, the 7th April, 2025

S.O. 578.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 26/2018) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum

Labour–Bhubaneswar, as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to The

Manager, M/s. Sahakar Global Ltd., Motto, Khurda; The Project Director, National Highways Authority of

India, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar, and Shri Hadibandhu Arisal, Worker, which was received along with soft copy

of the award by the Central Government on 03.04.2025.

[No. L-42025-07-2025-81- IR (DU]

DILIP KUMAR, Under Secy.

1458

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2025/CHAITRA 22, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR

Present:

Sri Dinesh Kumar Singh,

Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour Court,

Bhubaneswar.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 26/2018

Filed under Section 2-A(2) of the I.D. Act

Date of Passing Order – 29^th October, 2024

Between :-

Sri Hadibandhu Arisal,

At Dhaulimunha P.O., Brajamohanpur,

P.S. Khurda Sadar,

Distt. Khurda.

…

Applicant-Workman.

(And)

1. The Manager, M/s. Sahakar Global Ltd.,

At Godipada Tool Plaza, P.O. Motto,

P.S. Jankia, Dist. Khurda – 752 020.

2. The Project Director,

National Highway Authority of India,

Setu Bhawan, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar.

…

1^st Party-Managements.

Appearances:

Hadibandhu Arisal

…

For Himself

Applicant.

Sri Sajjal Kumar Bose.

…

For the Management No. 1.

None

…

For the Mgt. No. 2 & 3.

ORDER

This is an application of applicant-workman filed under section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act

(herein-after referred as an ―Act‖).

The case of the 2^nd party-workman in brief is as follows:-

That he was engaged as Tool Fees Collector under the Management No. 2 through different contractors from

08.11.2014 and continued to work till 03.06.2017 continuously and uninterruptedly. He further states that he was

receiving Rs. 9,300/- as wages per months which was less than the Minimum wages fixed by the Government of India

from time to time. After extending such a long period of service to the managements, they (Management) suddenly

terminated his services with effect from 03.06.2017 without paying any terminal benefits such as retrenchment

benefits and notice pay, in an illegal, unjustified and arbitrary manner adopting unfair labour practice. The

Managements have not followed the provisions of Section 25-F, 25-G and 25-H of the Act while refusing

employment to the workman which is illegal, unfair and unjust.

The 2^nd Party-Workmen raised the dispute before the conciliation authorities to get his legitimate claim and

on completion of statutory 45 days of conciliation proceeding the 2^nd party-workman has filed statement of claim

invoking amended act under section 2-A(2) of the I.D. Act for adjudication.

The 2^nd party-workman has prayed to pass an award in his favour.

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का राजृत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2025, /चैत्र 22, 1947

1459

On the other hand, Management No. 2 has appeared and filed written statement rebutted the stand taken by

the 2^nd party-workmen.

The 1^st Party-Management no. 2 has submitted that the 2^nd party-workman was engaged by the Management

No. 2. The Management No. 2 has also submitted that the agency for collection of toll fees at different toll gates are

selected through open tender. Engagement of workmen are within the domain of the agency concerned. The only

responsibility of the Management No. 2 to see that the workers engaged by the Management No. 1 are paid minimum

wages and EPF dues and ESI deductions. It has further stated that collection agent is engaged through open tender for

a period of one year and person engaged by the collection agency are to continue till continuance of the agreement

with the agency and the Management no. 2 is no connected with the terms and conditions of engagement of that

person by the agency.