362 GI/2026

(547)

रजजस्ट्री सं. डी.एल. (एन) 04/0007/2003—05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

xxxGIDHxxx

xxxGIDExxx

प्राजधकार से प्रकाजित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप् ताजहक

WEEKLY

सं. 3]

नई ददल् ली, जनवरी 25—जनवरी 31, 2026, िजनवार/माघ 5—माघ 11, 1947

No. 3]

NEW DELHI, JANUARY 25—JANUARY 31, 2026, SATURDAY/MAGHA 5––MAGHA 11, 1947

इस भाग में जभन् न ृृ्‍ सं्‍ या दी जाती हज जजससे दक यह ृृथक संकलन के प ृ में रखा जा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II—खण् ड 3—उृ-खण् ड (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों (रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर) द्वारा जारी दकए गए सांजवजधक आदेि और अजधसूचनाएं

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

ृरमाणु ऊजाा जवभाग

नई ददल्ली, 16 जनवरी, 2026

का.आ. 84.—केन्रीय सरकार, ृरमाणु ऊजाा जवभाग के प्रिाजसनक जनयंत्रणाधीन ृरमाणु ऊजाा जिक्षण संस्ट्था,

मुंबई के जनम् नजलजखत जवद्यालय के 80% से अजधक कमाचाररयों के हहदी का कायासाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लेने ृर इन् हें

राजभाषा जनयम (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोजनों के जलए प्रयोग),1976 के जनयम 10 के उृजनयम (4) के अनुसरण में

अजधसूजचत करती हज-:

1. ृरमाणु ऊजाा केंरीय जवद्यालय, इंदौर

[फा. सं. 11/हहदी/2025-26/2788-2948]

दीृ प्रकाि, वज्ञाजनक सजचव, एईसी एवं प्रमुख आईसीृीडी और अध्यक्ष राजभाषा कायाान्वय सजमजत, ृऊजव

सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-04022026-269795

CG-DL-W-04022026-269795

548

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 31, 2026/MAGHA 11, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

DEPARTMENT OF ATOMIC ENERGY

New Delhi, the 16th January, 2026

S.O. 84.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for official purpose of the

Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies following school of Atomic Energy Education Society,

Mumbai, under the administrative control of the Department of Atomic Energy, where more than 80% staff has

acquired working knowledge of Hindi -:

1. Atomic energy Central School, Indore

[F. No. 11/Hindi/2025-26/2788-2948]

DEEP PRAKASH, Scientific Secretary, AEC & Head, ICPD & Chairman, OLIC, DAE

नई ददल्ली, 22 जनवरी, 2026

का.आ. 85.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 (a1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V औद्योजगक

fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;

ds iapkV (a108/2023) izdkf'kr djrh gSA

[सं. एल-12011/14/2023-आई आर(बी-I)]

सलोनी, उृ जनदेिक

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 22nd January, 2026

S.O. 85.— In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 108/2023) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

No. I Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of ICICI Bank

Limited and their workmen.

[No. L-12011/14/2023– IR(B-I)]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT DELHI - 1,

NEW DELHI.

ID No. 108/2023

Sh. Rajbir Singh S/o Sh. Babu Ram, Through All India General Mazdoor Trade Union, 170 Bal Mukund Khand, Giri

Nagar, Kalkaji, New Delhi-110019.

…Claimant

Versus

1. The Chief Manager, ICICI Bank Limited, 876/2, Main Road, Sant Nagar, Burari, New Delhi-110084.

2. M/s G.I. Group Network Security Technology Private Limited, 581/3, III Floor, Chirag Delhi,

New Delhi-110017.

…Management

AWARD

In the present case, a reference was received from the appropriate Government vide letter

No-L-12011/14/2023 (IR(B-I)) dated 06.04.2023 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section

10 of the Act, for adjudication of a dispute, terms of which are as under:

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का राजृत्र : जनवरी 31, 2026/माघ 11, 1947

549

SCHEDULE

“Whether the demands of the All India General Mazdoor Trade Union vide their letter date 27.07.2021

regarding to grant the arrears of overtime wages for the period w.e.f. year, 2016 to year, 2019, amounts

in lieu of an-availed yearly leaves and weekly offs for the period w.e.f. year, 2016 to year, 2019, of

Sh. Rajbir Singh S/o Sh. Babu Ram is legal proper and justified? If yes, what relief Sh. Rajbir Singh is

entitled to and what other directions, if any, are necessary in this matter?”

In the reference order, the appropriate Government commanded the parties raising the dispute to file

statement of claim, complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses with this Tribunal within 15

days of receipt of the reference order and to forward a copy of such statement of claim to the opposite parties

involved in the dispute. Despite directions so given, Claimant union opted not to file the claim statement with the

Tribunal.

On receipt of the above reference, notice was sent to the workman as well as the managements. Neither the

postal article sent to the claimant, referred above, was received back nor was it observed by the Tribunal that postal

services remained unserved in the period, referred above. Therefore, every presumption lies in favor of the fact that

the above notice was served upon the claimant. Despite service of the notice, claimant opted to abstain away from the

proceedings. No claim statement was filed on his behalf. Thus, it is clear that the workman is not interested in

adjudication of the reference on merits.

Since the workman has neither put in his appearance nor he led any evidence so as to prove his cause against

the management, this Tribunal is left with no choice, except to pass a ‘No Dispute/Claim’ award. Let this award be

sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for publication.

Date: 29.09.2025

ATUL KUMAR GARG, Presiding Officer

नई ददल्ली, 22 जनवरी, 2026

का.आ. 86.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (a1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V औद्योजगक fookn

esa dsUnzh; ljdkj औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;

ds iapkV (a80/2024) izdkf'kr djrh gSA

[सं. एल-12025/01/2026-आई आर(बी-I)-26]

सलोनी, उृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 22nd January, 2026

S.O. 86.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 80/2024) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

No. I Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of CPWD and their

workmen.

[No L-12025/01/2026– IR(B-I)-26]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT DELHI - 1,

NEW DELHI.

ID No. 80/2024

Sh. Surender Majhi S/o Shri Bilas through All India CPWD Karamchari Union, Baba Lal Ji Complex, Shop No. 4,

Gurgaon Road, Opp. Bus Stand, Gurgaon.

…Claimant

Versus

1. The Director, CPWD, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi.

2. The Executive Engineer, Parliament Division, Y Shape Building, IP Bhawan, New Delhi.

550

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 31, 2026/MAGHA 11, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

3. Work Cum TLQ (A), Special Director of General Project and Chandigarh CPWD, Kendriya Sadan, Sec-9,

Chandigarh.

4. The Assistant Engineer, CPWD 2(T), G.P. O. Complex INA, New Delhi-110023.

5. M/s Hill Top Refrigeration, Govt. Contractor, Regd. Off. 2/103, Subhash Nagar, New Delhi-110027.

…Management

AWARD

In the present case, a reference was received from the appropriate Government vide letter No-ND-25/III-

36/2023-IR dated 12.04.2024 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Act, for

adjudication of a dispute, terms of which are as under:

SCHEDULE

„„Whether the demands of Shri Surender Majhi S/o Shri Bilas through All India CPWD Karamchari

Union for regularization of his services in the establishment of CPWD and payment of salary & other

benefits at par with his regular counterparts, is legal and/or justified? If so, what relief the workman

concerned is entitled and what directions are necessary in this regard?”

In the reference order, the appropriate Government commanded the parties raising the dispute to file

statement of claim, complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses with this Tribunal within 15 days

of receipt of the reference order and to forward a copy of such statement of claim to the opposite parties involved in

the dispute. Despite directions so given, Claimant union opted not to file the claim statement with the Tribunal.

On receipt of the above reference, notice was sent to the workman as well as the managements. Neither the

postal article sent to the claimant, referred above, was received back nor was it observed by the Tribunal that postal

services remained unserved in the period, referred above. Therefore, every presumption lies in favor of the fact that

the above notice was served upon the claimant. But, no claim statement was filed on his behalf. On one occasion,

attendance on behalf of the claimant was mark and more time was sought for filing of statement. Thereafter, neither

the claimant appeared nor filed statement of claim. Thus, it is clear that the workman is not interested in adjudication

of the reference on merits.

In these circumstances, this Tribunal is left with no choice, except to pass a ‘No Dispute/Claim’ award. Let

this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947,

for publication.

Date: 26.11.2025

ATUL KUMAR GARG, Presiding Officer

नई ददल्ली, 22 जनवरी, 2026

का.आ. 87.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (a1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

कोटक महहरा बैंक ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V औद्योजगक fookn esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;

ds iapkV (a158/2023) izdkf'kr djrh gSA

[सं. एल-12025/01/2026-आई आर(बी-I)-27]

सलोनी, उृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 22nd January, 2026

S.O. 87.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 158/2023) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

No. I Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Kotak Mahindra

Bank and their workmen.

[No. L-12025/01/2026– IR(B-I)-27]

SALONI, Dy. Director

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का राजृत्र : जनवरी 31, 2026/माघ 11, 1947

551

ANNEXURE

THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT DELHI - 1,

NEW DELHI.

ID No. 158/2023

Sh. Kumar Rajneesh, D-114, Gali No. 13, west Vinod Nagar near 30 futa road, Delhi-110092.

…Claimant

Versus

1. The Manager, Kotak Mahindra Bank, Hauz Qazi, Unit No. 3372-3382, Chawri Bazaar, Delhi-110006.

2. HR Manager, Kotak Mahindra Bank, Unit No. 829, sewa Corporate Park, 14^th Floor, MG Road, Revenue

State of Sarhaul Tehsil, Gurugram-122002.

…Management

AWARD

In the present case, a reference was received from the appropriate Government vide letter

No-96(21)/ID(2A)2023-DYCLC dated 30.06.2023 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section

10 of the Act, for adjudication of a dispute, terms of which are as under:

SCHEDULE

„„Whether the demand of Sh. Kumar Rajneesh, workman for reinstatement by the management of Kotak

Mahindra Bank is justified, fair and legal and if yes, then what relief the workman is entitled for?”