1699 GI/2026

(1599)

रजिस्ट्री सं. डी.एल. (एन) 04/0007/2003—05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

xxxGIDHxxx

xxxGIDExxx

प्राजधकार से प्रकाजित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप् ताजहक

WEEKLY

सं. 10]

नइ ददल् ली, मार्च 15—मार्च 21, 2026, िजनवार/ फाल् गुन 24—फाल् गुन 30, 1947

No. 10]

NEW DELHI, MARCH 15— MARCH 21, 2026, SATURDAY/ PHALGUNA 24––PHALGUNA 30, 1947

आस भाग में जभन् न ृृ्‍ सं्‍ या दी िाती हज जिससे दक यह ृृथक संकलन के प ृ में रखा िा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II—खण् ड 3—ईृ-खण् ड (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों (रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर) द्वारा िारी दकए गए सांजवजधक अदेि और ऄजधसूर्नाएं

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

जवत्त मंत्रालय

(रािस्ट्व जवभाग)

नइ ददल्ली, 16 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 328.—केन्र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकीय प्रयोिनों के जलए प्रयोग) जनयम, 1976 के जनयम 10

के ईृ-जनयम (4) के ऄनुसरण में, रािस्ट्व जवभाग के केन्रीय ऄप्रत्यक्ष कर एवं सीमा िुल्क बोडच के ऄधीन जनम्नजलजखत

कायाचलयों, जिनके 80 प्रजतित से ऄजधक ऄजधकाररयों एवं कमचर्ाररयों ने जहन्दी का कायचसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जलया हज, को

ऄजधसूजर्त करती हज।

क्रम सं.

कायाचलय का नाम

केंरीय माल और सेवा कर तथा केंरीय ईत्ृाद िुल्क, गांधीनगर अयुक्तालय (मु्‍यालय)

केंरीय माल और सेवा कर तथा केंरीय ईत्ृाद िुल्क, मेहसाना मण्डल, गांधीनगर अयुक्तालय

केंरीय माल और सेवा कर तथा केंरीय ईत्ृाद िुल्क, ृालनृुर मण्डल, गांधीनगर अयुक्तालय

सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-11042026-271694

CG-DL-W-11042026-271694

1600

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

केंरीय माल और सेवा कर तथा केंरीय ईत्ृाद िुल्क, कड़ी मण्डल, गांधीनगर अयुक्तालय

केंरीय माल और सेवा कर तथा केंरीय ईत्ृाद िुल्क, कलोल मण्डल, गांधीनगर अयुक्तालय

केंरीय माल और सेवा कर तथा केंरीय ईत्ृाद िुल्क, गांधीनगर मण्डल, गांधीनगर अयुक्तालय

केंरीय माल और सेवा कर तथा केंरीय ईत्ृाद िुल्क, जहम्मतनगर मण्डल, गांधीनगर अयुक्तालय

अयुक्त (ऄृील) का कायाचलय, केंरीय माल और सेवा कर, ऄहमदाबाद

अयुक्त का कायाचलय, केंरीय माल और सेवा कर अयुक्तालय, ृंर्कूला

[फा. सं. इ-11017/3/2017-जहन्दी-2-ऄजधसूर्ना]

प्रीजत सेलारे, ईृ जनदेिक (रा.भा.)

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Revenue)

New Delhi, the 16th March, 2026

S.O. 328.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for Official Purpose of the

Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies, the following offices under Central Board of Indirect

Taxes and Customs, Department of Revenue where more than 80% staff has acquired the working knowledge of

Hindi.

No.

Name of the Office

Central Goods and Services Tax and Central Excise, Gandhinagar Commissionerate (Headquarters)

Central Goods and Services Tax and Central Excise, Mehsana Division, Gandhinagar Commissionerate

Central Goods and Services Tax and Central Excise, Palanpur Division, Gandhinagar Commissionerate

Central Goods and Services Tax and Central Excise, Kadi Division, Gandhinagar Commissionerate

Central Goods and Services Tax and Central Excise, Kalol Division, Gandhinagar Commissionerate

Central Goods and Services Tax and Central Excise, Gandhinagar Division, Gandhinagar Commissionerate

Central Goods and Services Tax and Central Excise, Himmat Nagar Division, Gandhinagar Commissionerate

Office of the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Goods and Services Tax Appeal Commissionerate,

Ahmedabad

Office of the Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax Commissionerate, Panchkula.

[F. No. E-11017/3/2017- Hindi-2-Notification]

PREETI SELLARE, Dy. Director (OL)

ृेरोजलयम और प्राकृजतक गजस मंत्रालय

नइ ददल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 329.—भारत सरकार ने ृेरोजलयम और खजनि ृाआृलाआन (भूजम मे ईृयोग के ऄजधकार का ऄिचन)

ऄजधजनयम, 1962 (1962 का 50) जिसे आसमे आसके ृश्चात ईक्त ऄजधजनयम कहा गया हज) की धारा 3 दक ईृधारा (1) के

ऄधीन िारी भारत सरकार के ृेरोजलयम और प्राकृजतक गजस मंत्रालय की ऄजधसूर्ना सं्‍या का. अ. 3575(ऄ) तारीख

31.07.2025 िो भारत के ऄसाधारण रािृत्र तारीख 04.08.2025 मे प्रकाजित की गइ थी, द्वारा ईस ऄजधसूर्ना से

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1601

संलग्न ऄनुसूर्ी में जवजनर्ददष्ट भूजम में मजससच आंरधनुष गजस जिड जलजमटेड द्वारा ऄसम राज्य में जसलर्र सीिीडी स्ट्ृर लाआन

ऑफ गुवाहाटी-जिलांग-जसलर्र-ृानीसागर प्रकृजतक गजस ृाआृलाआन के मधायम से प्रकृजतक गजस के ृररवहन के जलए

ृाआृलाआन जबछाने के प्रयोिन के जलए ईृयोग के ऄजधकार का ऄिचन करने के ऄृने अिय की घोषणा की थी;

और ईक्त रािृजत्रत ऄजधसूर्ना की प्रजतयााँ िनता को ईृलब्ध करा दी गइ थी;

और सक्षम प्राजधकारी ने िनता से प्राप्त अक्षेृों को ृरीक्षण के ईृरांत जनृटान कर ददया हज;

और सक्षम प्राजधकारी ने, ईक्त ऄजधजनयम की धारा 6 की ईृ - धारा (1) के ऄधीन भारत सरकार को ऄृनी

ररृोटच दे दी हज;

और भारत सरकार ने, ईक्त ररृोटच ृर जवर्ार करने के ृश्चात और यह संतुष्ट हो िाने ृर दक ईक्त भूजम

ृाआृलाआन जबछाने के जलए ऄृेजक्षत हज, ईसमें ईृयोग के ऄजधकार का ऄिचन करने का जवजनश्चय दकया हज;

ऄतः ऄब, भारत सरकार, ईक्त ऄजधजनयम की धारा 6 दक ईृधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत िजक्तयों का प्रयोग करते हुये,

यह घोषणा करती हज दक आस ऄजधसूर्ना से संलग्न ऄनुसूर्ी में जवजनर्ददष्ट भूजम में ृाआृलाआन जबछाने के जलए ईृयोग के

ऄजधकार का ऄिचन दकया िाता हज;

और भारत सरकार, ईक्त ऄजधजनयम दक धारा 6 दक ईृधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत िजक्तयों का प्रयोग करते हुये, यह

जनदेि देती हज दक ृाआृलाआने जबछाने के जलए भूजम मे ईृयोग के ऄजधकार, आस घोषणा के प्रकािन की तारीख को, भारत

सरकार में जनजहत होने के बिाय, ृाआृलाआन जबछाने का प्रस्ट्ताव करने वाली मजससच आंरधनुष गजस जिड जलजमटेड में जनजहत

होगा और तदुृरर, भूजम में ऐसे ईृयोग का ऄजधकार, आस प्रकार ऄजधरोजृत जनबंधनों और ितों के ऄधीन रहते हुये, सभी

जवलंगमों से मुक्त, मजससच आंरधनुष गजस जिड जलजमटेड में जनजहत होगा।

ऄनुसूर्ी

जिला :कछार राज्य : ऄसम

सकचल

मौज़ा

गााँव

दाग नं

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेऄर

अर

वगच मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

कटीगोरह

भंगेरृार ृाटच-3

205

183

कटीगोरह

भंगेरृार ृाटच-5

247

कटीगोरह

र्ंदृुर ृाटच-3

कटीगोरह

जनज़ करटगोराह

ृाटच-2

जनज़ करटगोराह ृाटच-

203

204

205

218

216

227

कटीगोरह

रंघर ृाटच-3

203

जसलर्र

हजरबोन्ड ृाटच-2

100

106

323

जसलर्र

दुगाचृुर

168

1602

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

190

235

जसलर्र

ईिान िाम

211

214

209

208

194

197

431

432

ईदरबोन्ड

दुगाचनगर ृाटच-4

226

227

229

224

ईदरबोन्ड

डोयाृोर ृाटच- 4

140

142

126

125

सोनइ

धनेहरी ृाटच-१

228

398

399

401

406

408

407

464

462

463

466

455

454

453

458

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1603

468

469

472

473

474

475

478

479

485

487

489

490

572

580

581

584

585

586

597

सोनइ

बागृुर ृीटी 1

346

510

502

501

500

503

498

499

493

491

492

451

448

446

1604

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

447

385

386

384

378

387

390

393

396

449

450

[फा. सं. एल – 14014/249/2022 - िी ृी - II(इ - 45396)]

रामिी लाल मीना, ऄवर सजर्व

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi, the 10th March, 2026

S.O. 329.—Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas S.O.No.3575(E) dated the 31.07.2025, issued under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act),

published in the Extra Ordinary Gazette of India dated the 04.08.2025, the Government of India declared its intention

to acquire the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of

laying pipeline for transportation of Natural Gas through Silchar CGD Spur line of Guwahati - Shillong - Silchar -

Panisagar Section of North - East Natural Gas Pipeline in the state of Assam by Indradhanush Gas Grid

Limited (IGGL).

And whereas copies of the said Extraordinary Gazette notification were made available to the public.

And whereas the objections received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered and

disposed by the Competent Authority.

And whereas the Competent Authority has, under sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act submitted its

report to the Government of India.

And whereas the Government of India after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said

land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of the section 6 of the said Act, the

Government of India hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this

notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the

Government of India hereby directs that the Right of User in the land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting

in Government of India, vest, on this date of the publication of the declaration, in the Indradhanush Gas Grid Limited

(IGGL), free from all encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

District :Cachar

State: Assam

Circle

Mauza

Village

Dag No.

Area

Hec.

Arc

Sq.Mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

Katigorah

Bhangerpar Part-3

205

183

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1605

Katigorah

Bhangerpar Part-5

247

Katigorah

Chandpur Part-3

Katigorah

Niz-Katigorah Part-2

Niz-Katigorah Part-

203

204

205

218

216

227

Katigorah

Ranghar Part-3

203

Silchar

Heirbond Part-2

100

106

323

Silchar

Durgapur

168

190

235

Silchar

Ujangram

211

214

209

208

194

197

431

432

Udharbond

Durganagar Part-4

226

227

229

224

Udharbond

Doyapore Part-4

140

142

126

125

Sonai

Dhanehari Part 1

228

398

399

401

406

408

407

464

462

463

466

455

454

1606

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

453

458

468

469

472

473

474

475

478

479

485

487

489

490

572

580

581

584

585

586

597

Sonai

Bagpur Pt-1

346

510

502

501

500

503

498

499

493

491

492

451

448

446

447

385

386

384

378

387

390

393

396

449

450

[F. No. L – 14014/249/2022- G P - II (E - 45396)]

RAMJI LAL MEENA, Under Secy.

नइ ददल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 330.—भारत सरकार ने ृेरोजलयम और खजनि ृाआृलाआन (भूजम मे ईृयोग के ऄजधकार का ऄिचन)

ऄधीन िारी भारतसरकार के ृेरोजलयम और प्राकृजतक गजस मंत्रालय की ऄजधसूर्ना सं्‍या का. अ. No.3487(E) तारीख

12.08.2024िो भारत के ऄसाधारण रािृत्र तारीख14.08.2024 मे प्रकाजित की गइ थी, द्वारा ईस ऄजधसूर्ना से

संलग्न ऄनुसूर्ी में जवजनर्ददष्ट भूजम में मजससच आंरधनुष गजस जिड जलजमटेड द्वारा ऄसम राज्य में गुवाहाटी – नुमालीगढ़ प्रकृजतक

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1607

गजस ृाआृलाआन के मधायम से प्रकृजतक गजस के ृररवहन के जलए ृाआृलाआन जबछाने के प्रयोिन के जलए ईृयोग के

ऄजधकार का ऄिचन करने के ऄृने अिय की घोषणा की थी;

और ईक्त रािृजत्रत ऄजधसूर्ना की प्रजतयााँ िनता को ईृलब्ध करा दी गइ थी;

ररृोटच दे दी हज;

ऄतःऄब, भारतसरकार, ईक्त ऄजधजनयम की धारा 6 दक ईृधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत िजक्तयों का प्रयोग करते हुये,

ऄजधकार का ऄिचन दकया िाता हज;

सरकार में जनजहत होने के बिाय, ृाआृलाआन जबछाने का प्रस्ट्ताव करने वाली मजससचआंरधनुषगजसजिडजलजमटेड में जनजहत

जवलंगमों से मुक्त, मजससचआंरधनुषगजसजिडजलजमटेड में जनजहत होगा।

ऄनुसूर्ी

जिला :िोरहाट

राज्य : ऄसम

सकचल

मौज़ा

गााँव

दाग नं

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेऄर

अर

वगच

मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

िोरहाट ृजश्चम

बाजलगांव

मालौखाट

2475

[फा. सं. एल – 14014/1/2024 - िी ृी - II(इ - 48822)]

रामिी लाल मीना, ऄवर सजर्व

New Delhi, the 10th March, 2026

S.O. 330.—Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural

Gas S.O.No.3487(E) dated 12.08.2024, issued under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals

Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act),

published in the Extra Ordinary Gazette of India dated the 14.08.2024, the Government of India declared its intention

to acquire the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of

laying pipeline for transportation of Natural Gas through Guwahati-Numaligarh Gas Pipeline in the state of Assam by

Indradhanush Gas Grid Limited (IGGL).

And whereas copies of the said Extraordinary Gazette notification were made available to the public.

And whereas the objections received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered and

disposed by the Competent Authority.

And whereas the Competent Authority has, under sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act submitted its

report to the Government of India.

And whereas the Government of India after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said

land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of the section 6 of the said Act, the

Government of India hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this

notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

1608

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the

Government of India hereby directs that the Right of User in the land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting

in Government of India, vest, on this date of the publication of the declaration, in the Indradhanush Gas Grid Limited

(IGGL), free from all encumbrances.

District: Jorhat

State: Assam

Circle

Mouza

Name of Village

Dag

No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Square

Metre

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

Jorhat West

Baligaon

Malow Khat

2475

[F. No. L – 14014/1/2024- G P - II (E - 48822)]

RAMJI LAL MEENA, Under Secy.

नइ ददल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 331.—िबदक भारत सरकार को लोकजहत में यह अवश्यक प्रतीत होता हज दक ऄसम राज्य में नाथच – आस्ट्ट

नेर्ुरल गजस ृाआृलाआन जिड ृररयोिना के गुवाहाटी–नुमालीगढ़ - दीमाृुर खंड के माध्यम से प्राकृजतक गजस के ृररवहन के

जलए मजससच आंरधनुष गजस जिड जलजमटेड द्वारा एक ृाआृलाआन जबछाइ िानी र्ाजहए;

और भारत सरकार को ईक्त ृाआृलाआन जबछाने के प्रयोिन के जलए यह अवश्यक प्रतीत होता हे दक ईस भूजम में,

जिसमे ईक्त ृाआृलाआन जबछाए िाने का प्रस्ट्ताव हज और िो आस ऄजधसूर्ना में संलग्न ऄनुसूर्ी में वर्णणत हज, ईृयोग के

ऄजधकार का ऄिचन दकया िाए;

ऄतःऄब, भारत सरकार, ृेरोजलयम और खजनि ृाआृलाआन (भूजम मे ईृयोग के ऄजधकार का ऄिचन)

ऄजधजनयम, 1962 (1962 का 50) दक धारा 3 दक ईृधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त िजक्तयों का प्रयोग करते हुए, ईस भूजम मे

ईृयोग के ऄजधकार का ऄिचन करने के ऄृने अिय की घोषणा करती हज;

कोइ व्यजक्त, िो ईकत ऄनुसूर्ी मे वर्णणत भूजम में जहतबदध हज, ईस ताररख से जिसको ईक्त ऄजधजनयम की धारा 3

की ईृधारा (1) के ऄधीन भारत के रािृत्र मे यथा प्रकाजित आस ऄजधसूर्ना की प्रजतयों साधारण िनता को ईृलब्ध कर

दी िाती हज, 21 ददन के भीतर, भूजम के नीर्े ृाआृलाआन जबछाए िाने की संबंध मे, सक्षम प्राजधकारी, मजससच आंरधनुष गजस

जिड जलजमटेड, ऄसम राज्य, को जलजखत प ृ में अक्षेृ भेि सकेगा |

ऄनुसूर्ी

जिला : गोलाघाट

राज्य : ऄसम

सकचल

मौज़ा

गााँव

दाग नं

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेऄर

अर

वगच

मीटर

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

सप ृथार

बारृथार

रेंगमा िांट

259

[फा. सं. एल – 14014/18/2023 - िी ृी - II(इ - 47090)]

रामिी लाल मीना, ऄवर सजर्व

New Delhi, the 10th March, 2026

S.O. 331.—Whereas it appears to the Government of India that it is necessary in public interest that for

transportation of natural gas through Guwahati – Numaligarh – Dimapur Section of North - East Natural Gas Pipeline

Grid Project in the State of Assam, a pipeline should be laid by M/s Indradhanush Gas Grid Limited;

And, whereas it appears to Government of India that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is

necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is

described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1609

Now, therefore, in exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and

Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962, (50 of 1962) Government of India hereby

declares its intention to acquire the Right of User therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date

of which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the

Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of User

therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Competent Authority, M/s Indradhanush Gas Grid Limited, State

of Assam.

SCHEDULE

District: Golaghat

State: Assam

Circle

Mouza

Village

Dag No.

Area

Hectare

Are

Square

Meter

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

Sarupathar

Barpathar

Rengma Grant

259

[F. No. L – 14014/18/2023- G P - II (E - 47090)]

RAMJI LAL MEENA, Under Secy.

श्रम और रोिगार मन्त्रालय

नइ ददल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 332.—vkS?kksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (a1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

मेससच अइसीअइसीअइ बैंक जलजमटेड ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS?kksfxd fookn

esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS?kksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua 2 eqEcbZ ds iapkV (6/2020) izdkf”kr djrh gSA

[सं. एल-12011/04/2020-अइ अर(बी-I)]

सलोनी, ईृ जनदेिक

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 10th March, 2026

S.O. 332.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 6/2020) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

No. 2 Mumbai as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. ICICI

Bank Limited and their workmen.

[No. L-12011/04/2020- IR (B-I)]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE JUSTICE RETIRED SHIV SHANKER PRASAD

PRESIDING OFFICER/LINK OFFICER

THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI

PRESENT

JUSTICE RETIRED SHIV SHANKER PRASAD

Presiding Officer/Link Officer

REFERENCE NO. CGIT-2/6 of 2020

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF

First Party No. 1. M/s. ICICI Bank Limited

The General Manager, Head-HR,

M/s. ICICI Bank Limited,

South Tower,

9^th Floor, West Wing,

1610

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Bandra Kurla Complex,

Bandra (E),

Mumbai 400 051.

State: Maharashtra

2. M/s. Proklean Services

M/s. Proklean Services,

10, Aishwarya Towers,

Ground Floor,

Kalina,

Santacruz (E),

Mumbai 400 055.

State: Maharashtra

3. M/s. Rare Hospitality & Services Pvt. Ltd.,

M/s. Rare Hospitality & Services Pvt. Ltd.,

10, Aishwarya Towers,

Ground Floor,

Kalina,

Santacruz (E),

Mumbai 400 055.

State: Maharashtra

AND

THEIR WORKMEN.

Party No. 2 (Bhartiya Kamgar Karmachari Mahasangh)

The Vice President,

Bhartiya Kamgar Karmachari Mahasangh

5, Navalkar Lane, 1st Floor,

Prarthana Samaj,

Girgaon,

Mumbai- 400 004,

Mumbai.

APPEARANCES:

Management

No appearance.

Workmen

No appearance.

AWARD

(Delivered on 22-01-2026)

This Reference has been made by the Central Government in exercise of powers under clause (d) of sub-

section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, vide Government of India,

Ministry of Labour & Employment, New Delhi, order No. L-12011/04/2020 (IR(B-I) dated 17.02.2020. The terms of

reference given in the schedule are as follows:

“Whether the management of ICICI Bank Ltd., and M/s. Proklean Services, Contractor is liable to pay

payment of Rs.1560/- per month to their workmen at par with other set of office boys alongwith arrears of

last two years? Whether the present dispute is legal and justified? If not, what relief the workers are

entitled?”

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1611

The case is called out today. Both parties are absent. From perusal of record, it is apparent that, the

petitioner/workman is not responding and attending the Court since 22.07.2022 long back despite service of notice.

No Statement of Claim has been filed by the petitioner/workman till today. The respondent has also not filed his

Written Statements till now. Both parties are absent. Both parties are not coming to the Court since long back. It

appears that, both parties are not interested to contest the case furthermore. The claim of the petitioner is not proved.

So, the case is closed.

Hence, it is ordered.

ORDER

The management of ICICI Bank Ltd., and M/s. Prokean Services, Contractor is not liable to pay payment of

Rs.1560/- per month to their workmen at par with other set of office boys alongwith arrears of last two years.

The present dispute is not legal and justified. The workers are not entitled to any relief.

Date: 22-01-2026

Justice SHIV SHANKER PRASAD, Presiding Officer/Link Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 333.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;

ljdkj बीसीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

] धनबाद-I ds iapkV (कॉम्ृ.केस. क्रमांक 01/2022

.रेफ केस क्रमांक 62/2008) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/96/2008-अइ अर(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 10th March, 2026

S.O. 333.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Comp.Case. No. 01/2022 .Refe Case No. 62/2008) of the Central

Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial

dispute between the Management of BCCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government

on 09/03/2026.

[No. L-20012/96/2008– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD

Comp. Case No. 01/2022

Arising out of REF Case No. 62/2008

Saroj Kumar Singh

Store Keeper, Bera Colliery

M/s. BCCL, Dhanbad………………………………………………………………………………..Complainants

Vs.

Project Officer,

Bera Colliery, Bastacolla Area

M/s. BCCL, Dhanbad.……………………………………………………………………………Opposite

Parties

Appearances:

For Complainant :- None.

For Opp. Party

:- None.

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

1612

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Presiding Officer

State : Jharkhand

Dated 04/02/2026

ORDER

This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of

India for disposal of pending cases.

Case is called out.

On call none is present from either side.

Perused the record. After perusal of record it appears that concerned workman appeared on 24.01.2022 and

filed an application under section 33 of I.D. Act, 1947 and regd. Notice was issued to opposite party and both the

parties appeared for certain dates. On 07.01.2026 Shri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate for the Opp. Party appeared and

submitted that original case Ref No. 62/2008 from which this case arises has been disposed of on 28.09.2022 so case

may be closed.

In view of the fact that the original case has already been decided against the complainant, this case has no

merit and is hereby dismissed.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 334.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;

ljdkj बीसीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

] धनबाद-I ds iapkV (

58/2004) dks

izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/21/2004-अइ अर(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 10th March, 2026

S.O. 334.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 58/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

BCCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026

[No. L-20012/21/2004– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 58/2004

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of Govindpur Area-III

Of M/s. BCCL, Dhanbad

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Sri Ankit Shrivastava, Dy. Manager (HR)

For the workman :- None.

State : Bihar.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 04/02/2026

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1613

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order

No.L-20012/21/2004 IR(C-I) dated 08/16.06.2004 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the

employer i.e. management of Govindpur Area –III of M/s. BCCL, Dhanbad and their workman through Vice

President, Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―क्मा याष्ट्रीम कोलरमयी भजदूय सॊघ की बा को को लर, गोव ॊदऩुय ऺेत्र – III के प्रफॊधतॊत्र से भाॉग कक कभमकाय

श्री जागेश् य लसॊह को भाइनय रोडय से भाइननॊग लसयदाय के ऩद ऩय ऩदोन्नती ऩय ेतन ननधामयण भें उन्हें ऩू म

ेतन भें ऩे-प्रोटेक्शन ददमा जाए, उचित ए ॊ न्मामसॊगत है? मदद हाॉ तो कभमकाय ककस याहत के ऩात्र हैं तथा

ककस तायीख से ?‖

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India for

disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-20012/21/2004 IR(C-I) dated 08/16.06.2004 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 58 of 2004 was registered on 28.06.2004 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

4. After service of notice, both parties appeared previously. It further appears that after 2006 this case was put up on

26.11.2021 and registered notices were issued to both the parties but workman/union failed to appear before this

Tribunal. However Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate on behalf of the management appeared. Today Sri Ankit

Shrivastava, Dy. Manager (HR) is present but workman/union remained absent before the Tribunal. It transpires from

the case record that workman/union failed to appear before the Tribunal since 2021 which shows that workman/union

has lost his interest in this case and therefore, for the ends of justice, this Tribunal is of the opinion that the case

deserves to be dismissed due to non prosecution.

5. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 335.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;

ljdkj सीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

] धनबाद-I ds iapkV (

65/2004) dks

izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/55/2004-अइ अर(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 10th March, 2026

S.O. 335.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 65/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

CCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026

[No. L-20012/55/2004– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

1614

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 65/2004

Parties:

Employer in relation to the management of Giridih Area

of M/s. CCL, Giridih

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 04/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order

No.L-20012/55/2004 -IR(C-I) dated 28/06/2004 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the

employer i.e. management of Giridih Area of M/s. CCL, Giridih and their workman through Secretary, United

Coal Workers Union, Giridih for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―क्मा सी सी एर, चगयीदीह ऺेत्र के प्रफॊधतॊत्र द् ाया कभमकाय श्री भकफूर अरी को ऩीस येट से टाइभ येट भें ननमलभत ककए

जाने के सभम उनको ऩू म देम ेतन ए ॊ SPRA का प्रोटेक्शन न ददमा जाना उचित ए ॊ न्मामसॊगत है? मदद नहीॊ तो

कभमकाय ककस याहत के ऩात्र हैं तथा ककस तायीख से ?‖

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India for

disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-20012/55/2004 -IR(C-I) dated 28/06/2004 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 65 of 2004 was registered on 12.07.2004 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

4. After service of notice, both parties appeared previously. It further appears that after 2006 this case was put up

after a long gap on 20.12.2021 and registered notices were issued to both the parties but workman/union failed to

appear before this Tribunal. However Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate on behalf of the management appeared. It

transpires from the case record that workman/union failed to appear before the Tribunal since 2021 which shows that

workman/union has lost his interest in this case and therefore, for the ends of justice, this Tribunal is of the opinion

that the case deserves to be dismissed due to non prosecution.

5. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 336.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;

ljdkj बीसीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

] धनबाद-I ds iapkV (

60/2002) dks

izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/29/2002-अइ अर(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1615

New Delhi, the 10th March, 2026

S.O. 336.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 60/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

BCCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026

[No. L-20012/29/2002– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 60/2002

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of Kusunda Area

of M/s. BCCL, Kusunda, Dhanbad

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Sri Chandra Prakash, Manager (HR)

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 04/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order

No.L-20012/29/2002 -IR(C-I) dated 30/05/2002 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer

i.e. management of Kusunda Area of M/s BCCL, Dhanbad and their workman through Secretary, Bihar Colliery

Kamgar Union, Hirapur, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the management of M/s. BCCL in dismissing Sri Bablu Hari of Industry

Colliery from the services of the company w.e.f. 1.12.2000 is fair and justified? If not, to what relief is

the concerned workman entitled?‖

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India for

disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-20012/29/2002- IR(C-I) dated 30/05/2002 Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New

Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 60 of 2002 was registered on 10.06.2002 and thereafter the

notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

4. After receipt of the reference on 10.06.2002, this case was put up after a long gap on 30.07.2021 and regd.

notices were issued to both the parties but neither the workman nor the management appeared before this Tribunal.

Today Sri Chandra Prakash, Manager (HR) appeared for the management but workman/union failed to appear.

5. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that workman/union never appeared before this Tribunal since

beginning which shows that he has lost his interest in this case and therefore, for the ends of justice, this case deserves

to be dismissed for non prosecution.

1616

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

6. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 337.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;

ljdkj बीसीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

] धनबाद-I ds iapkV (

42/2015) dks

izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/91/2015-अइ अर(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 10th March, 2026

S.O. 337.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 42/2015) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

BCCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026.

[No. L-20012/91/2015– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 42/2015

Parties:

Employer in relation to the management of Bastacolla Area

Of M/s. BCCL, Jharia, Dhanbad

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 04/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order

No.L-20012/91/2015 -IR(CM-I) dated 17/09/2015 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the

employer i.e. management of Bastacolla Area of M/s. BCCL, Jharia, Dhanbad and their workman through Central

Secretary, Jharkhand Colliery Mazdoor Union, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1617

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the Management of Ghanoodih Colliery of M/s BCCL in dismissing Shri

Suresh Kumar, Pers. No. 02830552, Ex-Miner Loader from the services of the Company vide order

dated 01/03.02.1999 is justified and fair? To what relief the concerned workman is entitled to?‖

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India for

disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-20012/91/2015 -IR(CM-I) dated 17/09/2015 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 42 of 2015 was registered on 01.10.2015 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

4. After service of notice, both parties appeared previously and filed their authorities, W/S and subsequently

rejoinder. It further appears that after 03.02.2023 workman/union failed to appear before this Tribunal. However Sri

Nitish Sahay, Ld. Advocate on behalf of the management appeared on certain dates but after 23.07.2025 he also failed

to appear.

5. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that workman/union never appeared before this Tribunal since

2023 which shows that he has lost his interest in this case and therefore, for the ends of justice, this case deserves to

be dismissed for non prosecution.

6. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 338.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;

ljdkj बीसीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

] धनबाद-I ds iapkV (

41/2010) dks

izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/55/2010-अइ अर(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 10th March, 2026

S.O. 338.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 41/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

BCCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026

[No. L-20012/55/2010– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 41/2010

Parties:

Employer in relation to the management of E.J. Area

Of M/s. BCCL, Bhowra, Dhanbad

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None.

For the workman :- None.

1618

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 04/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order

No.L-20012/55/2010 -IR(CM-I) dated 27/07/2010 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the

employer i.e. management of E.J. Area of M/s. BCCL, Bhowra, Dhanbad and their workman through Treasurer,

Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the management for allegedly not providing employment to Ms. Bhakti

Kumari, the daughter of deceased workman namely Chhota Dasi Bouri is legal and justified? To what

relief the claimant entitled for?‖

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India for

disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-20012/55/2010 -IR(CM-I) dated 27/07/2010 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 41 of 2010 was registered on 11.08.2010 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

4. After service of notice, both parties appeared previously and filed their authorities, W/S and subsequently

rejoinder. It further appears that after 2018 this case was put up after a long gap on 06.10.2025 and registered notices

were issued to both the parties but workman/union failed to appear before this Tribunal. However Sri D.K. Verma,

Ld. Advocate on behalf of the management appeared.

5. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that workman/union never appeared before this Tribunal since

November 2017 which shows that he has lost his interest in this case and therefore, for the ends of justice, this case

deserves to be dismissed for non prosecution.

6. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 339.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k

esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj दामोदर घाटी जनगम ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

]

-I

ds iapkV (

25/2003) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-42012/171/2002-अइअर-(सीएम-II)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 10th March, 2026

S.O. 339.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 25/2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

Damodar Valley Corporation and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026

[No. L-42012/171/2002– IR (CM-II)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1619

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 25/2003

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of Damodar Valley

Corporation, Kolkata

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None.

For the workman :- None.

State : Bihar.

Industry:-Power

Dated 04/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order

No.L-42012/171/2002 IR(CM-II) dated 11/02/2003 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the

employer i.e. management of Damodar Valley Corporation, Kolkata and their workman through D.V.C. Staff

Association, Maithon Dam, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the management of Damodar Valley Corporation in imposing penalty of

stoppage of annual increments and recovery of 50% of Rs. 43238.93 in equal monthly instalments against

the cost of pilferage of material, on Sri S.K. Das is fair and justified? If not, to what relief the concerned

workman is entitled to?‖

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India

for disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-42012/171/2002- IR(CM-II) dated 11/02/2003 Government of India, Ministry of

Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 25 of 2003 was registered on 18.03.2003

and thereafter the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements

along with relevant documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

4. After receipt of the reference, Sri A.S. Das, Committee Member of the sponsoring union appeared and filed

written statement on 05.04.2004 but after that failed to appear. However management appeared on certain dates.

After 24.08.2007 this case was put up on 17.09.2021, but no step was taken from both sides and regd. notices were

again issued on 30.05.2025 to both the parties for appearance and on 08.08.2025, Sri Tapas Rai, Dy. Manager

(H.R.) appeared on behalf of the management but workman/union failed to appear. Thereafter management also

failed to appear before this Tribunal.

5. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that both the parties have lost their interest in this case and

therefore, for the ends of justice, this case deserves to be dismissed for non prosecution.

6. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of

the above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 340.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj बीसीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

]

-I

ds iapkV (

19/2011) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/53/2010-अइ अर(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

1620

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 10th March, 2026

S.O. 340.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 19/2011) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

BCCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026

[No. L-20012/53/2010– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 19/2011

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of Kusunda Area

of M/s. BCCL, Kusunda, Dhanbad

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Sri Chandra Prakash, Manager (HR)

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 04/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order

No.L-20012/53/2010 -IR(CM-I) dated 29/03/2011 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the

employer i.e. management of Kusunda Area of M/s BCCL, Dhanbad and their workman through General Secretary,

Coal Mines Engineering Workers Association, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―The dispute of alleged denial of employment to the dependent of Late Shankar Das is not deemed fit for

adjudication as the deceased workman was dismissed from services prior to his death and there is no provision

under NCWA for providing employment to the dependant of a dismissed workman‖

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India for

disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-20012/53/2010- IR(CM-I) dated 29/03/2011 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 19 of 2011 was registered on 11.04.2011 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

4. After receipt of the reference on 11.04.2011, this case was put up after a long gap on 27.01.2022 and regd.

notices were issued to both the parties but workman/union failed to appear before this Tribunal and notice of the

union returned with endorsement ―Incomplete Address‖ However Sri N. Nath, O.S. Legal H.Q. on behalf of the

management appeared. Today Sri Chandra Prakash, Manager (HR) appeared for the management but workman/union

failed to appear.

5. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that workman/union never appeared before this Tribunal since

begining which shows that he has lost his interest in this case and therefore, for the ends of justice, this case deserves

to be dismissed for non prosecution.

6. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1621

नइ ददल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 341.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj सीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

]

-I ds iapkV (

61/2004) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/53/2004-अइ अर(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 10th March, 2026

S.O. 341.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 61/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

CCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026.

[No. L-20012/53/2004– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 61/2004

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of Giridih Area

Of M/s. CCL, Giridih

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 04/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order

No.L-20012/53/2004 -IR(C-I) dated 28/06/2004 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer

i.e. management of Giridih Area of M/s. CCL, Giridih and their workman through Secretary, United Coal Workers

Union, Giridih for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the management of Giridih Colliery under Giridih Area of M/s C.C.L., PO-

Beniadih, Distt-Gigidih in not correcting the date of appointment of Sri Tahiu Mian, Ex-Mining Sirdar from

10.1.1970 to 1.1.1959 as per record and also not paying the retirement benefits and other legal dues counting

his service w.e.f. 1.1.1959 is proper and justified? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled?‖

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India for

disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-20012/53/2004- IR(C-I) dated 28/06/2004 Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New

Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 61 of 2004 was registered on 12.07.2004 and thereafter the

notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

1622

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

4. After receipt of the reference on 12.07.2004, this case was put up after a long gap on 25.11.2021 and regd.

notices were issued to both the parties but neither the workman nor the management appeared before this Tribunal

and the notice of the union returned with endorsement ―Insufficient Address‖.

5. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that both the parties have lost their interest in this case and

therefore, for the ends of justice, this case deserves to be dismissed for non prosecution.

6. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 10 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 342.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj बीसीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

]

-I ds iapkV (

35/2002) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/559/2001-अइ अर(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 10th March, 2026

S.O. 342.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 35/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

BCCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026.

[No. L-20012/559/2001– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 35/2002

Parties:

Employer in relation to the management of Amlabad Colliery

Of M/s. BCCL, Amlabad, Dhanbad

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 03/02/2026

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1623

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its

Order No.L-20012/559/2001-IR(C-I) dated 28/02/2002 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between

the employer i.e. management of Amlabad Colliery of M/s. BCCL, Dhanbad and their workman through General

Secretary, Jharkhand Janta Mazdoor Union, Koylanagar, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the management of Amlabad Colliery‘s is justified in dismissing Shri Arjun Bhuiya from

service. If not, to what relief is the workman concerned entitled?‖

2. On receiving order no. L-20012/559/2001-IR(C-I) dated 28/02/2002 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 35 of 2002 was registered on 21.03.2002 and

thereafter the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along

with relevant documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

3. After receipt of the reference on 21.03.2002, this case was put after a long gap on 31.12.2015 and Sri Pintu

Mondal, Representative for the workman appeared and a notice was issued to the management and thereafter both

the parties appeared for certain dates and filed their Authority and written statement and after 20.12.2017, Sri U.N.

Lall, Advocate for the management failed to appear before this Tribunal. However Sri Pintu Mondal,

representative of the union appeared till 23.09.2021 but thereafter did not appear before this Tribunal. On

24.12.2021 Sri Sadhu Sharan Pd., Representative of the union appeared and thereafter he remained present. On

05.08.2025, Sri Pradeep Kumar Singh, Secretary of sponsoring union appeared and filed a petition stating therein

that the workman is not interested to contest the case. So case may be closed.

4. As per petition dated 05.08.2025, his prayer is allowed and accordingly this case is hereby dismissed as

withdrawn and it is further ordered that ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the above reference case.

Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment, Government of India, New

Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 343.— fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 (a1947 dk 14 ) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k

esa dsUnzh; ljdkj सेंरल बैंक ऑफ आंजडया ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k

esa fufnZ’V fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;

ds iapkV

(a269/2001) izdkf”kr djrh gSA

[सं. ,y - 12011/175/2001- vkbZ vkj (ch-II)]

सलोनी, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 11th March, 2026

S.O. 343.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the

Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 269/2001) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court No. 1,Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the

management of Central Bank of India their workmen.

[No. L-12011/175/2001- IR(B-II)]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 269/2001

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of Central Bank of India, Patna

AND

Their Workman

1624

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None.

For the workman :- None.

State : Bihar.

Industry:-Bank

Dated 22/01/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order

No.L-12011/175/2001-IR(B-II) dated 10/12/2001 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the

employer i.e. management of Central Bank of India, Patna and their workman through Regional Secretary, Bihar

State Central Bank Employees Union, Patna for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the management of Central Bank of India, Patna issuing transfer order to

the workmen i.e. S/Sh. R.N. Prasad, M.L. Mishra, G.N. Banerjee, N.K. Jha and Rajendra Prasad and post

them to their original place of posting as Head Cashier (E) is justified? If not, what relief the workmen are

entitled to?‖

2. On receiving order no. L-12011/175/2001-IR(B-II) dated 10/12/2001 Government of India, Ministry of

Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 269 of 2001 was registered on 31.12.2001

and thereafter the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements

along with relevant documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

3. After issuance of regd. notice, none appeared on behalf of both the parties. It further transpires from

the case record, when the case record was put up after a long gap on 14.01.2021, registered notices were sent to

both the parties but even thereafter no step was taken from both sides.

4. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that both the parties never appeared before this

Tribunal for a period of 24 years which shows that both the parties have lost their interest in this case and

therefore, for the ends of justice, this case deserves to be dismissed for non prosecution.

5. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect

of the above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 344.— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds

vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj बीबीएमबी ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds

deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

] चंडीगढ़-II ds iapkV (

33/2019) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS]

tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल -23012/12/2019 -

एम-II)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 11th March, 2026

S.O. 344.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 33/2019) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Chandigarh-II as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

BBMB and their workmen received by the Central Government on 10/03/2026

[No. L-23012/12/2019-IR (CM-II)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1625

ANNEXURE

In the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court-II, Chandigarh

(Present:- Mr. Kamal Kant, Presiding Officer).

ID No.33/2019

Registered on:-14.05.2019

Gian Singh S/o Shri Prem Singh, R/o VPO Dehad, Tehsil Jhandutta, District Bilaspur, Himachal

Pradesh.

-------- Workman

Versus

1. The Chairman,Bhakra Beas Management Board, Madhya Marg, Sector 19-B, Chandigarh-160019.

2. The Chief Engineer, Bhakra Beas Management Board, BSL Project, Sundernagar-175038.

----Management

Present:-

Sh. S C Gupta, AR for workman.

Sh. Sandeep Sharma (Law Officer), AR for respondent no.1 & 2.

Award : 19.12.2025

Central Government vide Notification No.L-23012/12/2019-IR(CM-II) dated 14.05.2019, under

sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter called the

Act), has referred the following Industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:-

“Whether the action of management of BBMB in not accepting the demand of Shri Gian

Singh S/o Shri Prem Singh for deeming/considering him in continuous service upto age of

superannuation and resultantly entitled for consequential benefits is legal, just and valid? If

not, to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to and from which date?”

1. The case is fixed for filing affidavit in evidence on behalf of workman. However today, AR for workman

made a statement that the workman has expired and none of the legal heirs is coming forward to contest the

case. The case may be dispose of accordingly. The statement is recorded separately.

2. Thus, in view of the statement of AR for workman, this Tribunal is left with no choice, except to pass a 'No

Claim Award'. Accordingly, 'No Claim Award' is passed in the present reference.

3. Let copy of this award be sent to the Appropriate Government as required under Section 17 of the Act for

publication.

KAMAL KANT, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 345.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj रटस्ट्को ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

] -I ds

iapkV (

215/2001) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/319/2001-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 11th March, 2026

S.O. 345.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 215/2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

Tisco. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026

[No. L-20012/319/2001– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

1626

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 215/2001

Parties:

Employer in relation to the management of Digwadih Colliery

of M/s. TISCO, Dhanbad

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 03/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.L-

20012/319/2001-IR(C-I) dated 24/09/2001 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer i.e.

management of Digwadih Colliery of M/s. TISCO, Dhanbad and their workman through Joint Secretary, Colliery

Karamchari Sangh, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the management of M/s TISCO, Digwadih Coll. In dismissing Sri Harish Chand

from service is justified? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled?‖

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India for

disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-20012/319/2001-IR(C-I) dated 24/09/2001 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 215 of 2001 was registered on 01.11.2001 and

thereafter the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with

relevant documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

4. After service of notice, both parties appeared previously and filed their authorities, W/S and subsequently

rejoinder. It further appears that after 2006 this case was put up on 17.09.2021 and registered notices were issued to

both the parties but workman/union failed to appear before this Tribunal. Thereafter on 04.07.2022 regd. notice was

again issued to workman/union but same was returned with endorsement ―Insufficient Address‖. However Sri D.K.

Verma, Ld. Advocate for the management appeared. It transpires from the case record that workman/union failed to

appear before the Tribunal since the year 2021 which shows that workman/union has lost his interest in this case and

therefore, this Tribunal is of the opinion that the case deserves to be dismissed due to non prosecution.

5. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 346.— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k

esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj बीसीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k

esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

]

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1627

-I

ds iapkV (

06/2011) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/31/2010-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 11th March, 2026

S.O. 346.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 06/2011) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

BCCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026

[No. L-20012/31/2010– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 06/2011

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of Western Jharia Area of

M/s. BCCL, Moonidih Dhanbad

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Kumari Versha, APM

For the workman :- Sri S.S. De, Secretary

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 03/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.L-

20012/31/2010 -IR(CM-I) dated 23/02/2011 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer i.e.

management of W.J. Area of M/s. BCCL, Dhanbad and their workman through Secretary, Koyla Ispat Mazdoor

Panchayat, Jharia, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the management of Moonidih Project of M/s BCCL in not providing Cat-VI as

Fan Operator to Sri Rajak Mia is fair and justified? to what relief the concerned workman is entitled?‖

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India for

disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-20012/31/2010- IR(CM-I) dated 23/02/2011 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 06 of 2011 was registered on 08.03.2011 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

4. After receipt of the reference this case was put up after a long gap on 27.01.2022 and regd. notices were issued

to both the parties but no step was taken from both sides. Thereafter on 20.06.2025, Sri N. Nath, O.S. Legal H.Q. for

the management appeared but workman/union failed to appear and regd. notice was again issued to workman/union

for appearance and the same was returned with endorsement ―Addressee Left‖. Though on 03.02.2026, Smt. Varsha,

A.P.M., for the management appeared and filed a notice of retirement of concerned workman and submitted that

concerned workman is retired on 31.01.2017. Sri S.S. De, Secretary for the union also appeared and prayed to close

the case

1628

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

5. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that the workman has lost his interest in this case and therefore,

for the ends of justice, this case deserves to be dismissed for non prosecution.

6. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 347.— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k

esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj बीसीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

]

-I ds iapkV (

25/2001) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/426/2000-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 11th March, 2026

S.O. 347.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 25/2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

BCCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026

[No. L-20012/426/2000– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 25/2001

Parties:

Employer in relation to the management of Sijua Area

of M/s. BCCL, Sijua, Dhanbad

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Sri Jagdish Karmkar, A.P.M.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 03/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.L-

20012/426/2000 (C-I) dated 25/01/2001 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer i.e.

management of Sijua Area of M/s. BCCL, Dhanbad and their workman through Organizing Secretary, Rashtriya

Colliery Mazdoor Sangh, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1629

SCHEDULE

―Whether the demand of the RCMS from the management of M/s BCCL for providing employment to the

dependent of Late Somar Chouhan of 9 pit of Loyabad Colliery under Sijua Area No. 5 is justified? If so, to

what relief is the said dependent of deceased employee entitled ?‖

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India for

disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-20012/426/2000 (C-I) dated 25/01/2001 Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New

Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 25 of 2001 was registered on 01.03.2001 and thereafter the

notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

4. After service of notice, both parties appeared previously and filed their authorities, W/S and subsequently

rejoinder. It further appears that after 2006 this case was put up after a long gap on 23.12.2019 and registered notices

were issued to both the parties and both the parties appeared on certain dates and this case is pending for adducing

evidence by the workman. Thereafter on 13.11.2025 Sri N.G. Arun, Representative for the workman appeared and

prayed time for evidence as last chance but thereafter failed to appear. However Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate on

behalf of the management appeared. It transpires from the case record that workman/union failed to appear before the

Tribunal as last chance was given which shows that workman/union has lost his interest in this case and therefore, this

Tribunal is of the opinion that the case deserves to be dismissed due to non prosecution.

5. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 348.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj सीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

]

-I

ds iapkV (

31/2019) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/61/2019-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 11th March, 2026

S.O. 348.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 31/2019) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

CCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026

[No. L-20012/61/2019– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 31/2019

Parties:

Employer in relation to the management of Rajrappa Area

Of M/s. CCL, Rajrappa, Ramgarh.

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

1630

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 03/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.L-

20012/61/2019-IR(CM-I) dated 11/11/2019 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer i.e.

management of Rajrappa Area of M/s. CCL, Rajrappa, Ramgarh and their workman through Joint Secretary,

Jharkhand Koyla Mazdoor Union for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether workmen Bhim Mahto and twenty (20) other drill operators were illegally not given promotion

in next higher grade as per II.32 of NCWA VII of Rajrappa Area of M/s BCCL? If yes, then what remedies

they are entitled to?‖

2. On receiving order no. L-20012/61/2019-IR(CM-I) dated 11/11/2019 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 31 of 2019 was registered on 19.11.2019 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

3. After service of notice, both parties appeared previously and filed their authorities, W/S and subsequently

rejoinder. It further appears that after 22.01.2021 workman/union failed to appear before this Tribunal. However Sri

D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate on behalf of the management appeared. Thereafter on 12.06.2025 second regd. notice was

issued to workman/union but he again failed to appear before this Tribunal and the same was returned with

endorsement ―Refused‖. It transpires from the case record that workman/union failed to appear before the Tribunal

since the year 2021 and lastly he refused to receive the notice which shows that workman/union has lost his interest in

this case and therefore, this Tribunal is of the opinion that the case deserves to be dismissed due to non prosecution.

4. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 349.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj सीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

]

-I ds iapkV (

16/2019) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/426/2000-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 11th March, 2026

S.O. 349.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 16/2019) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

CCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026.

[No. L-20012/426/2000– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1631

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 16/2019

Parties:

Employer in relation to the management of Gidi ‗A‘ Colliery

of M/s CCL, Gidi, Hazaribagh

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 03/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.

L-20012/87/2013-IR(CM-I) dated 19/02/2019 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer

i.e. management of Gidi ‗A‘ Colliery of M/s. CCL, Hazaribagh and their workman through Secetary, BCKU, Gidi,

Hazaribagh for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the management of Gidi ‗A‘ Colliery of M/s CCL in denying regularization to

S/Shri Munshi Mahto and 11 others (List enclosed) is legal, proper and justified?

ii) If not, what benefits they are entitled to and from which date?

iii) And, what other directions are required in this regards.‖

LIST OF WORKERS

Sl. No.

Name

Father‘s Name

Shri Munshi Mahto

Late Lalku Mahto

Shri Raju Pandey

Shri Madan Pandey

Shri Ketar Mahto

Late Ganga Ram Mahto

Shri Basudeo Mahto

Late Chamu Mahto

Shri Chola Ram

Late Laldhari Ram

Shri Saiynath

Late Puran Mahto

Shri Mithlesh

Shri Munshi Mahto

Shri Subhash

Late Bhawani Prajapati

Shri Sanjay Saw

Shri Raghu Saw

10.

Shri Rambilash

Late Gauri Mahto

11.

Shri Gauri Mahto

Late Manki Mahto

12.

Shri Kedar

Shri Sitku Mahto

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India for

disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-20012/87/2013-IR(CM-I) dated 19/02/2019 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 16 of 2019 was registered on 19.03.2019 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

3. After service of notice, both parties appeared previously and filed their authorities, W/S and subsequently

rejoinder. It further appears that after 04.03.2020 workman/union failed to appear before this Tribunal. However Sri

D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate for the management appeared. Thereafter on 20.06.2025 2^nd regd. notice was issued to

union but he again failed to appear. It transpires from the case record that workman/union failed to appear before the

Tribunal since the year 2021 which shows that workman/union has lost his interest in this case and therefore, this

Tribunal is of the opinion that the case deserves to be dismissed due to non prosecution.

4. Hence,

1632

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 350.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj बीसीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

]

-I ds iapkV (

65/2014) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/45/2014-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 11th March, 2026

S.O. 350.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 65/2014) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

BCCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026

[No. L-20012/45/2014– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 65/2014

Parties:

Employer in relation to the management of Bastacolla Area

of M/s. BCCL, Jharia, Dhanbad

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Sri Rishi Raj Meena, Asst. Manager Legal

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 03/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.

L-20012/45/2014-IR(CM-I) dated 04/06/2014 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer

i.e. management of Bastacolla Area of M/s. BCCL, Dhanbad and their workman through Incharge, Jharkhand

Colliery Mazdoor Union, Jharia, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1633

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the management of Bastacolla Colliery of M/s BCCL in not regularizing Sri Ashok

Kumar to the post of Cap Lamp Issue Clerk is fair and justified? To what relief the concerned workman is

entitled to?‖

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India for

disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-20012/45/2014-IR(CM-I) dated 04/06/2014 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 65 of 2014 was registered on 17.06.2014 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

4. After service of notice, both parties appeared previously and filed their authorities, W/S and subsequently

rejoinder. It further appears that after 2017 this case was put up on 01.05.2019 and registered notices were issued to

both the parties and both the parties appeared on certain dates. After 06.03.2020, workman/union failed to appear

before this Tribunal. Thereafter on 31.07.2025 regd. notice was again issued to workman/union and the same was

returned with endorsement ―Unclaimed‖. However Sri Ganesh Prasad, Ld. Advocate on behalf of the management

appeared. Today Sri Rishi Raj Meena, Asst. Manager Legal for the management is present. It transpires from the case

record that workman/union failed to appear before the Tribunal since the year 2020 which shows that workman/union

has lost his interest in this case and therefore, this Tribunal is of the opinion that the case deserves to be dismissed due

to non prosecution.

5. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 351.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj बीसीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

]

-I ds iapkV (

51/2015) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/114/2015-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 11th March, 2026

S.O. 351.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 51/2015) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

BCCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026

[No. L-20012/114/2015– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 51/2015

Parties:

Employer in relation to the management of Sijua Area

of M/s. BCCL, Sijua, Dhanbad

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

1634

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Sri Jagdish Karmkar, A.P.M.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 03/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.

L-20012/114/2015 (IR(CM-I)) dated 09/10/2015 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the

employer i.e. management of Sijua Area of M/s. BCCL, Dhanbad and their workman through Secretary, Rashtriya

Mazdoor Union, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the management of Sijua Area of M/s BCCL in dismissing Sri Mangru Manjhi,

M/Loader vide letter dated 6.10.2003 is fair and justified? To what relief the concerned workman is entitle to?‖

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India for

disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-20012/114/2015-IR(CM-I) dated 09/10/2015 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 51 of 2015 was registered on 02.11.2015 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

4. After receipt of the reference Sri Sunil Kr. Sinha, Secretary for the union appeared and filed written statement and

regd. notice was issued to management and both parties appeared for certain dates. Thereafter on 18.01.2018

workman failed to appear and on 06.10.2025 this case put up after a long gap and regd. notices were issued to both

the parties and notice of the workman/union returned with endorsement ―Addressee not trace‖. However Sri D.K.

Verma, Ld. Advocate for the management appeared. Today Sri Jagdish Karmkar, APM for the management is

present. It transpires from the case record that workman/union failed to appear before the Tribunal since the year 2018

which shows that workman/union has lost his interest in this case and therefore, this Tribunal is of the opinion that the

case deserves to be dismissed due to non prosecution.

5. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 352.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj बीसीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

]

-I ds iapkV (

38/2015) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/73/2015-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 11th March, 2026

S.O. 352.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 38/2015) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

BCCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026

[No. L-20012/73/2015– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1635

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 38/2015

Parties:

Employer in relation to the management of Govindpur Area No.III

of M/s. BCCL, Dhanbad

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Sri Amit Kumar, Area Manager, H.R.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 03/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.L-

20012/73/2015-IR(CM-I) dated 26/08/2015 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer i.e.

management of Govindpur Area No.III of M/s. BCCL, Dhanbad and their workman through Central Secetary,

Jharkhand Colliery Mazdoor Union, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the management of Jogidih Colliery under Katras Area of M/s BCCL in

dismissing Sri Pando Bouri from the services w.e.f. 2/3.3.2006 is fair and justified? To what relief the

concerned workman is entitled to?‖

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India for

disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-20012/73/2015-IR(CM-I) dated 26/08/2015 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 38 of 2015 was registered on 07.09.2015 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

4. After service of notice, both parties appeared previously and filed their authorities, W/S and subsequently

documents. It further appears that after 19.03.2021 workman/union failed to appear before this Tribunal till

12.05.2022, thereafter Sri Balmiki Pd., Advocate for the workman appeared on 23.06.2022 after that he again failed to

appear and regd. notice was again issued on 14.10.2025 but he failed to appear. However management appeared on

certain dates. Today, Sri Amit Kumar, Area Manager, H.R. for the management is present. It transpires from the case

record that workman/union failed to appear before the Tribunal since the year 2022 which shows that workman/union

has lost his interest in this case and therefore, this Tribunal is of the opinion that the case deserves to be dismissed due

to non prosecution.

5. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 11 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 353.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj सेल.र्ासनाल्ला कोजलयरी ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp]

vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

] -I ds iapkV (

79/2014) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj

dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/73/2014-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

1636

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 11th March, 2026

S.O. 353.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 79/2014) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

Sail.Chasnalla Colliery and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026.

[No. L-20012/73/2014– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 79/2014

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of Chasnalla Colliery

of M/S SAIL, Chasnalla, Dhanbad

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 03/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.

L-20012/73/2014 -IR(CM-I) dated 14/08/2014 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer

i.e. management of Chasnalla Colliery of M/S SAIL, Dhanbad and their workman through Joint Secretary, Bahujan

Mazdoor Union, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the Management of Chasnalla Colliery of M/s SAIL in dismissing Sri Birendra

Nath Bauri Ex-Mazdoor, Pers. No. 92614 from the services of the Company vide office order dated

21/23.08.1999 is fair and justified? To what relief the concerned workman is entitled?‖

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India for

disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-20012/73/2014- IR(CM-I) dated 14/08/2014 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 79 of 2014 was registered on 26.08.2014 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

4. After receipt of the reference this case was put up on 17.01.2022 and regd. notices were issued to both the

parties but no step was taken from both sides. Thereafter on 04.07.2025 regd. notices were again issued to both the

parties and both parties appeared. On 07.01.2026, Sri R.R. Ram, Representative for the workman appeared and

submitted that workman is not interested to contest the case so case may be closed.

5. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that the workman has lost his interest in this case and therefore,

for the ends of justice, this case deserves to be dismissed for non prosecution.

6. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1637

नइ ददल्ली, 12 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 354.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj बीसीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

]

-I ds iapkV (

17/2003) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/205/2002-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 12th March, 2026

S.O. 354.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 17/2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

BCCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026.

[No. L-20012/205/2002– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 17/2003

Parties:

Employer in relation to the management of Block-II Area of

M/s. BCCL, Dhanbad

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 03/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.

L-20012/205/2002-IR(C-I) dated 24/01/2003 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer

i.e. management of Block-II Area of M/s. BCCL, Dhanbad and their workman through Regional Secretary, Dhanbad

Colliery Karamchari Sangh, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―क्मा बा. को. को. लर., प्रफॊधन द् ाया कभमकाय श्री ऩयभात्भा लसॊह उत्ऩादन-सह-सुयऺा-सहामक ग्रेड-“फी” फेनीडीह

ओ. सी. ऩी. को कामामरम आदेश सॊख्मा-भु.भ.प्र./ब्रॉक-2/का.व ./464/91 ददनाॊक 22.7.1991 के अनुसाय र्म 1991

से उत्ऩादन-सह-सुयऺा-सहामक ग्रेड-“फी” के ऩद ऩय ऩदोन्नत न भानना तथा उसे ऩदोन्नत ेतनभान का राब र्म

1991 से न प्रदान कयना न्मामसॊगत, उचित ए ॊ सही है ? मदद नहीॊ तो कभमकाय ककन राबों के हकदाय हैं तथा ककस

तायीख से?‖

1638

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2. On receiving order no. L-20012/205/2002-IR(C-I) dated 24/01/2003 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 17 of 2003 was registered on 05.02.2003 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

3. After service of notice, both parties appeared previously and filed their authorities, W/S and subsequently

rejoinder. It further appears that after 2006 this case was put up after a long gap on 17.08.2021 and registered notices

were issued to both the parties but both the parties failed to appear before this Tribunal and the notice of the union

returned with endorsement ―अधूरा पता के चलते वापस”. Though on 13.06.2025 Sri N. Nath, O.S. Legal H.Q.

appeared for the management and thereafter failed to appear before the Tribunal. It transpires from the case record

that workman/union failed to appear before the Tribunal since the year 2021 which shows that workman/union has

lost his interest in this case and therefore, this Tribunal is of the opinion that the case deserves to be dismissed due to

non prosecution.

4. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 12 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 355.— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k

esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj सीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

]

-I ds iapkV (

188/2001) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/319/2000-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 12th March, 2026

S.O. 355.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 188/2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

CCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026

[No. L-20012/319/2000– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 188/2001

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of Giridih Area

Of M/s. CCL, Giridih.

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 05/02/2026

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1639

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.

L-20012/319/2000-IR(C-I) dated 29/08/2001 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer

i.e. management of Giridih Area of M/s. CCL, Giridih and their workman through Regional Secretary, Rashtriya

Colliery Mazdoor Sangh, Beniyadih, Giridih for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―क्मा याष्ट्रीम कोलरमयी भजदूय सॊघ की सी. सी. एर. चगयदीह कोलरमयी के प्रफॊधतॊत्र से भाॉग कक श्री एि. एर.

नत ायी को दी गई ऩदा नती कक सजा ाऩस री जाए उचित ए ॊ न्मामसॊगत है ? मदद हाॉ तो इस सॊफॊध भें क्मा

आदेश आ श्मक हैं ?‖

2. On receiving order no. L-20012/319/2000-IR(C-I) dated 29/08/2001 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 188 of 2001 was registered on 21.09.2001 and

thereafter the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with

relevant documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

3. After receipt of the reference on 21.09.2001, this case record was put up after a long gap on 17.09.2021 and

registered notices were sent to both the parties and Sri Rajwardhan Kumar Dy. Manager (P) appeared on 20.12.2021

and filed his letter of authority on behalf of management but thereafter neither the workman nor the management

appeared before this Tribunal.

4. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that both the parties never appeared before this Tribunal since

31.01.2022 which shows that the both the parties have lost their interest in this case and therefore, for the ends of

justice, this case deserves to be dismissed for non prosecution.

5. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 12 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 356.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj बीसीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

]

-I ds iapkV (

92/2004) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/111/2004-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 12th March, 2026

S.O. 356.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 92/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

BCCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026

[No. L-20012/111/2004– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 92/2004

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of Western Jharia Area

Of M/s. BCCL, Moonidih, Dhanbad

AND

Their Workman

1640

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 05/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.

L-20012/111/2004-IR(C-I) dated 02/09/2004 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer

i.e. management of Western Jharia Area of M/s. BCCL, Dhanbad and their workman through Executive Chairman,

Bihar Janta Khan Mazdoor Sangh, Moonidih, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the management of Western Jharia Area of M/s BCCL, PO-Moonidih, Distt-

Dhanbad in not giving Shri Keshar Manjhi pay protection while placing/regularizing him from Tyndel,

Category-IV to the post of Driver, Cat-V is proper and justified? If not, to what relief is the workman

entitled?‖

2. On receiving order no. L-20012/111/2004-IR(C-I) dated 02/09/2004 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 92 of 2004 was registered on 14.09.2004 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

3. After receipt of the reference on 14.09.2004, this case record was put up after a long gap on 20.12.2021 and

registered notices were sent to both the parties but neither the workman nor the management appeared before this

Tribunal.

4. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that both the parties never appeared before this Tribunal since

begining which shows that both the parties have lost their interest in this case and therefore, for the ends of justice,

this case deserves to be dismissed for non prosecution.

5. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 12 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 357.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj सीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

] -I ds

iapkV (

81/2006) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/48/2002-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 12th March, 2026

S.O. 357.— In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 81/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

CCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026.

[No. L-20012/48/2002– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1641

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 81/2006

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of Hendegir Colliery

Of M/s. CCL, Ranchi

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 05/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.

L-20012/48/2002-IR(CM-I) dated 30/08/2006 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer

i.e. management of Hendegir Colliery of M/s. CCL, Ranchi and their workman through President, N.C.O.E.A.,

Hendegir, Ranchi for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the demand of the NCOEA from the management of CCL, Hendegir Colliery to give

employment to Sri. Jaysree Ganjhu the dependent of the deceased workman Smt. Late Bigni Reja as per the

provision of NCWA-V is justified? If so, to what relief is the said dependent entitled ?‖

2. On receiving order no. L-20012/48/2002-IR(CM-I) dated 30/08/2006 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 81 of 2006 was registered on 15.09.2006 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

3. After receipt of the reference on 15.09.2006, this case record was put up after a long gap on 20.12.2021 and

registered notices were sent to both the parties and both the parties appeared before this Tribunal on 14.03.2022 but

thereafter workman/union failed to appear before this Tribunal. However Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate on behalf of

the management appeared.

4. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that workman/union never appeared before this Tribunal after

14.03.2022 which shows that the workman/union has lost his interest in this case and therefore, for the ends of justice,

this case deserves to be dismissed for non prosecution.

5. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 12 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 358.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj बीसीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

]

-I ds iapkV (

21/2002) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/475/2001-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

1642

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 12th March, 2026

S.O. 358.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 21/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

BCCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026

[No. L-20012/475/2001– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 21/2002

Parties:

Employer in relation to the management of P.B. Area

Of M/s. BCCL, Kusunda, Dhanbad

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 05/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.L-

20012/475/2001-IR(C-I) dated 20/02/2002 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer i.e.

management of P.B. Area of M/s. BCCL, Dhanbad and their workman through Vice President, Mines Mazdoor

Union, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the management of Gopalichak Colliery of M/s BCCL in dismissing Sri Ghasi

Ram Bouri from the services of the company w.e.f. 17.6.2000 is justified? If not, to what relief is the concerned

workman entitled ?‖

2. On receiving order no. L-20012/475/2001-IR(C-I) dated 20/02/2002 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 21 of 2002 was registered on 21.03.2002 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

3. After service of notice, both parties appeared previously and filed their authorities, W/S and subsequently

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1643

rejoinder. It further appears that after 2006 this case was put up after a long gap on 28.07.2021 and registered notices

were issued to both the parties and Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate on behalf of the management appeared but

workman/union failed to appear before this Tribunal and the notice of the workman/union returned with endorsement

―Incomplete Address‖. However, Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate for the management appeared. It transpires from the

case record that workman/union failed to appear before the Tribunal since the year 2021 which shows that

workman/union has lost his interest in this case and therefore, this Tribunal is of the opinion that the case deserves to

be dismissed due to non prosecution.

4. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 12 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 359.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj सीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

] -I ds

iapkV (

62/2004) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/59/2004-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 12th March, 2026

S.O. 359.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the

Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 62/2004) of the Central Government

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute

between the Management of CCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on

09/03/2026

[No. L-20012/59/2004– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 62/2004

Parties:

Employer in relation to the management of Churi Colliery under

N.K. Area of M/s. C.C.L., Ray, Ranchi

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 05/02/2026

1644

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.

L-20012/59/2004-IR(C-I) dated 28/06/2004 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer i.e.

management of Churi Colliery under N.K. Area of M/s. CCL, Ranchi and their workman through Vice President,

Janta Mazdoor Sangh, Ray, Ranchi for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the management of Churi Colliery under N K Area of M/s C.C.L., PO-Ray, Distt-

Ranchi in not providing employment to Sri Ram Dular Mahato on compassionate grounds as dependent son of

Late Mahadeo Mahato, Security Guard under the provisions of N.C.W.A. is proper and justified? If not, to

what relief is the said dependent of the deceased workman entitled ?‖

2. On receiving order no. L-20012/59/2004-IR(C-I) dated 28/06/2004 Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New

Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 62 of 2004 was registered on 12.07.2004 and thereafter the

notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

3. After service of notice, both parties appeared previously and filed their authorities, W/S and subsequently

rejoinder. It further appears that after 2007 this case was put up after a long gap on 25.11.2021 and registered notices

were issued to both the parties and Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate on behalf of the management appeared but

workman/union failed to appear before this Tribunal. It transpires from the case record that workman/union failed to

appear before the Tribunal since the year 2021 which shows that workman/union has lost his interest in this case and

therefore, this Tribunal is of the opinion that the case deserves to be dismissed due to non prosecution.

4. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 12 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 360.— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k

esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj बीसीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

]

-I ds iapkV (

37/2011) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/101/2010-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 12th March, 2026

S.O. 360.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 37/2011) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

BCCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026

[No. L-20012/101/2010– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1645

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 37/2011

Parties:

Employer in relation to the management of Sijua Area

of M/s. BCCL, Sijua, Dhanbad

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 05/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.L-

20012/101/2010 -IR(CM-I) dated 07/07/2011 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer

i.e. management of Sijua Area of M/s BCCL, Sijua, Dhanbad and their workman through Vice President, Janta

Mazdoor Sangh, Jharia, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the management of Sendra Bansjora Colliery of M/s BCCL in not providing

employment to Smt. Hasina Khatoon, dependant wife of late Allauddin Mia under the provision of NCWA is

fair and justified? To what relief the dependent wife of late Allauddin Mia is entitled to?‖

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India for

disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-20012/101/2010 -IR(CM-I) dated 07/07/2011 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 37 of 2011 was registered on 22.07.2011 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

4. After service of notice, both parties appeared previously and filed their authorities, W/S and subsequently

rejoinder. It further appears that Sri K.N. Singh, Representative for the workman appeared on 24.12.2025 and

submitted that workman is not interested to contest the case so case may be closed.

5. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that the workman has lost his interest in this case and therefore,

for the ends of justice, this case deserves to be dismissed for non prosecution.

6. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 12 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 361.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj सीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

] -I ds

iapkV (

109/2002) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/101/2002-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

1646

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 12th March, 2026

S.O. 361.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 109/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

CCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026

[No. L-20012/101/2002– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 109/2002

Parties:

Employer in relation to the management of Topa Colliery

Of M/s. CCL, Hazaribagh

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 03/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.L-

20012/101/2002-IR(C-I) dated 07/10/2002 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer i.e.

management of Topa Colliery of M/s. CCL, Hazaribagh and their workman through Vice President, UCWU, Topa,

Hazaribagh for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―क्मा मूनाइटेड कोर कमसम मूननमन की सी. सी. एर. टॉऩ कोलरमयी के प्रफॊधतॊत्र से भाॉग कक कभमकाय सोना

गॊजु के आचश्रत ऩुत्र श्री ऩयभेश् य गॊजु को एन सी डब््मू ए के प्रा धानानुसाय अनुकॊऩा आधाय ऩय ननमुक्क्त का राब

ददमा जाए उचित ए ॊ न्माम सॊगत है? मदद हाॉ तो कभमकाय ककस याहत के ऩात्र हैं?‖

2. On receiving order no. L-20012/101/2002-IR(C-I) dated 07/10/2002 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 109 of 2002 was registered on 18.11.2002 and

thereafter the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with

relevant documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

3. After service of notice, both parties appeared previously and filed their authorities, W/S and subsequently rejoinder

but thereafter workman did not appear after 07.02.2003. However management appeared on certain dates. It further

appears that after 2006 this case was put up after a long gap on 05.08.2021 and registered notices were issued to both

the parties but workman/union again failed to appear before this Tribunal. However Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate on

behalf of the management appeared. It transpires from the case record that workman/union failed to appear before the

Tribunal after 07.02.2003 which shows that workman/union has lost his interest in this case and therefore, this

Tribunal is of the opinion that the case deserves to be dismissed due to non prosecution.

4. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1647

नइ ददल्ली, 12 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 362.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj बीसीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

]

-I ds iapkV (

27/2002) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/511/2001-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 12th March, 2026

S.O. 362.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 27/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

BCCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026

[No. L-20012/511/2001– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 27/2002

Parties:

Employer in relation to the management of Block-II Area

Of M/s. BCCL, Nawagarh, Dhanbad

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 03/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.

L-20012/511/2001-IR(C-I) dated 20/02/2002 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer

i.e. management of Block-II Area of M/s. BCCL, Dhanbad and their workman through Organizing Secretary,

Dhanbad Colliery Karamchari Sangh, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―क्मा बायत कोककॊग कोर लरलभटेड, ब्रॉक-II ऺेत्र के प्रफॊधतॊत्र द् ाया, श्री लभथरेश प्रसाद लसॊह, केमय टेकय को

5.7.1990 से टेक्क्नकर ग्रैड “फी” न ददमा जाना उचित तथा उक्त ग्रेड का ेतन न ददमा जाना उचित ए ॊ न्माम

सॊगत है? मदद नहीॊ तो कभमकाय ककस याहत के ऩात्र हैं?‖

2. On receiving order no. L-20012/511/2001-IR(C-I) dated 20/02/2002 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 27 of 2002 was registered on 21.03.2002 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

1648

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

3. After service of notice, both parties appeared previously and filed their authorities, W/S and subsequently

rejoinder. It further appears that after 2006 this case was put up after a long gap on 30.07.2021 and registered notices

were issued to both the parties but workman/union did not appear before the Tribunal. However, Sri D.K. Verma, Ld.

Advocate for the management appeared. It transpires from the case record that workman/union failed to appear

before the Tribunal since the year 2021 which shows that workman/union has lost his interest in this case and

therefore, this Tribunal is of the opinion that the case deserves to be dismissed due to non prosecution.

4. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 12 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 363.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj सीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

] -I ds

iapkV (

22/2002) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/515/2001-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 12th March, 2026

S.O. 363.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 22/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

CCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026.

[No. L-20012/515/2001– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 22/2002

Parties:

Employer in relation to the management of Karo Spl. Project

of M/s. CCL Ltd., Bokaro

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 03/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.

L-20012/515/2001-IR(C-I) dated 20/02/2002 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer

i.e. management of Karo Spl. Project of M/s. CCL, Bokaro and their workman through Zonal Secretary, N.C.O.E.A,

Bokaro Thermal, Bokaro for adjudication by this Tribunal:

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1649

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the management of Karo Spl. Project of M/s CCL, to dismiss the services of

Shri Rasik Manjhi, workman is fair, justified and legal? If not, to what relief is the workman concerned

entitled?‖

2. On receiving order no. L-20012/515/2001-IR(C-I) dated 20/02/2002 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 22 of 2002 was registered on 21.03.2002 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

3. After service of notice, both parties appeared previously and filed their authorities, W/S and subsequently

rejoinder. It further appears that after 2006 this case was put up after a long gap on 30.07.2021 and registered notices

were issued to both the parties and on 20.09.2021, Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate on behalf of the management

appeared but workman/union failed to appear and a regd. notice was again sent to the workman/union but he did not

appear before the Tribunal. However, Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate for the management appeared. It transpires from

the case record that workman/union failed to appear before the Tribunal since the year 2021 which shows that

workman/union has lost his interest in this case and therefore, this Tribunal is of the opinion that the case deserves to

be dismissed due to non prosecution.

4. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 13 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 364.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj सीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

] -I ds

iapkV (

79/2006) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/582/2001-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 13th March, 2026

S.O. 364.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 79/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

CCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026.

[No. L-20012/582/2001– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 79/2006

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of Hendegir Colliery

of M/s. CCL, Hendegir, Ranchi

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate.

For the workman :- None.

1650

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 06/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.

L-20012/582/2001-IR(CM-I) dated 30/08/2006 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer

i.e. management of Hendegir Colliery of M/s BCCL, Ranchi and their workman through President, N.C.O.E.A.,

Hendegir, Ranchi for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the demand of the NCOEA from the management of CCL, Hendegir Colliery to give

employment to Smt. Jharmani Devi the dependent of the deceased workman Shri Late Jharia Ganjhu as per

the provision of NCWA-V is justified? If so, to what relief is the said dependent entitled?‖

2. On receiving order no. L-20012/582/2001-IR(CM-I) dated 30/08/2006 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 79 of 2006 was registered on 15.09.2006 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

3. After receipt of the reference on 15.09.2006, this case record was put up after a long gap on 20.12.2021 and

registered notices were sent to both the parties and both parties appeared on 14.03.2022 but thereafter workman/union

failed to appear before this Tribunal. However Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate on behalf of the management appeared.

4. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that workman/union never appeared before this Tribunal since

April, 2022 which shows that the workman/union has lost his interest in this case and therefore, for the ends of

justice, this case deserves to be dismissed for non prosecution.

5. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 13 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 365.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj सीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

]

-I ds iapkV (

78/2006) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/583/2001-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 13th March, 2026

S.O. 365.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 78/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

CCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026

[No. L-20012/583/2001– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 78/2006

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of Hendegir Colliery

of M/s. CCL, Hendegir, Ranchi

AND

Their Workman

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1651

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 06/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.L-

20012/583/2001-IR(CM-I) dated 30/08/2006 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer

i.e. management of Hendegir Colliery of M/s BCCL, Ranchi and their workman through President, N.C.O.E.A.,

Hendegir, Ranchi for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the demand of the NCOEA from the management of CCL, Hendegir Colliery to give

employment to Smt. Shanti Devi the dependent of the deceased workman Shri Late Jhagta Ganjhu as per the

provision of NCWA-V is justified? If so, to what relief is the said dependent entitled?‖

2. On receiving order no. L-20012/583/2001-IR(CM-I) dated 30/08/2006 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 78 of 2006 was registered on 15.09.2006 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

3. After receipt of the reference on 15.09.2006, this case record was put up after a long gap on 20.12.2021 and

registered notices were sent to both the parties and both parties appeared on 14.03.2022 but thereafter workman/union

failed to appear before this Tribunal. However Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate on behalf of the management appeared.

4. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that workman/union never appeared before this Tribunal since

April, 2022 which shows that the workman/union has lost his interest in this case and therefore, for the ends of

justice, this case deserves to be dismissed for non prosecution.

5. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 13 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 366.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj बीसीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

]

-I ds iapkV (

28/2003) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/235/2002-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 13th March, 2026

S.O. 366.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 28/2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

BCCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026.

[No. L-20012/235/2002– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

1652

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 28/2003

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of Kusunda Area

of M/s. BCCL, Kusunda, Dhanbad

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None.

For the workman :- Sri Pradeep Kr. Singh, Secretary

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 06/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.

L-20012/235/2002-IR(C-I) dated 10/03/2003 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer

i.e. management of Kusunda Area of M/s. BCCL, Dhanbad and their workman through General Secretary, Jharkhand

Janta Mazdoor Union, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the management of Godhur Colliery of M/s BCCL in dismissing Sri Badri Bhuia

from the services of the company w.e.f. 15.6.2001 is fair and justified? If not to what relief is the concerned

workman entitled?‖

2. On receiving order no. L-20012/235/2002-IR(C-I) dated 10/03/2003 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 28 of 2003 was registered on 28.04.2003 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

3. After receipt of the reference on 28.04.2003, this case record was put up after a long gap on 17.09.2021 and

registered notices were sent to both the parties and on 07.02.2022 Sri Sadhu Sharan Pd., Representative on behalf of

the workman appeared but management failed to appear thereafter workman also failed to appear before this Tribunal.

Later on, on 22.08.2025 and 24.10.2025 Sri Pradeep Kumar Singh, Secretary of the union appeared and submitted

that concerned workman is not interested to contest this case so case may be closed.

4. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that workman/union has lost his interest in this case and

therefore, for the ends of justice, this case deserves to be dismissed for non prosecution.

5. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 13 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 367.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj सीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

] -I ds

iapkV (

80/2006) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/581/2001-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1653

New Delhi, the 13th March, 2026

S.O. 367.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 80/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

CCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026.

[No. L-20012/581/2001– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 80/2006

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of Hendegir Colliery

of M/s. CCL, Hendegir, Ranchi

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 06/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order

No.L-20012/581/2001-IR(CM-I) dated 30/08/2006 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the

employer i.e. management of Hendegir Colliery of M/s BCCL, Ranchi and their workman through President,

N.C.O.E.A., Hendegir, Ranchi for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the demand of the NCOEA from the management of CCL, Hendegir Colliery to give

employment to Shri Sukhiram Manjhi the dependent of the deceased workman Shri Late Dilka Manjhi as

per the provision of NCWA-V is justified? If so, to what relief is the said dependent entitled?‖

2. On receiving order no. L-20012/581/2001-IR(CM-I) dated 30/08/2006 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 80 of 2006 was registered on 15.09.2006 and

thereafter the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along

with relevant documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

3. After receipt of the reference on 15.09.2006, this case record was put up after a long gap on 20.12.2021 and

registered notices were sent to both the parties and both parties appeared on 14.03.2022 but thereafter

workman/union failed to appear before this Tribunal. However Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate on behalf of the

management appeared.

1654

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that workman/union never appeared before this Tribunal since

April, 2022 which shows that the workman/union has lost his interest in this case and therefore, for the ends of

justice, this case deserves to be dismissed for non prosecution.

5. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 13 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 368.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj बीसीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

]

-I

ds iapkV (

36/2004) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/275/2003-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 13th March, 2026

S.O. 368.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 36/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

BCCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026.

[No. L-20012/275/2003– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 36/2004

Parties:

Employer in relation to the management of Bastacolla Area

of M/s. BCCL, Jharia, Dhanbad

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 06/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.

L-20012/275/2003 -IR(C-I) dated 26/04/2004 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer

i.e. management of Bastacolla Area of M/s BCCL, Dhanbad and their workman through Secretary, Bihar Colliery

Kamgar Union, Hirapur, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1655

SCHEDULE

―Whether the demand of the Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union from the management of Bastacolla Colliery

of M/s BCCL for regularising Sri Seo Kumar Pswan as Fitter Helper w.e.f. 17.9.98 with protection of wages

and for giving financial benefits under SLU since 1.1.96 is fair and justified? If so, to what relief is the

concerned workman entitled?‖

2. On receiving order no. L-20012/275/2003 -IR(C-I) dated 26/04/2004 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 36 of 2004 was registered on 14.05.2004 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

3. After receipt of the reference on 14.05.2004, this case was put up after a long gap on 26.11.2022 and regd. notices

were issued to both the parties but neither the workman nor the management appeared before the Tribunal. Thereafter

on 20.06.2025 Sri Rishi Raj Meena, Asst. Manager (L) for the management appeared after that he remained present

but workman/union failed to appear.

4. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that the workman/union never appeared before this Tribunal

since the beginning which shows that he has lost his interest in this case and therefore, for the ends of justice, this case

deserves to be dismissed for non prosecution.

5. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 13 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 369.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj सीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

] -I ds

iapkV (

77/2006) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/585/2001-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 13th March, 2026

S.O. 369.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 77/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

CCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026

[No. L-20012/585/2001– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 77/2006

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of Hendegir Colliery

of M/s. CCL, Hendegir, Ranchi

AND

Their Workman

1656

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 06/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order

No.L-20012/585/2001-IR(CM-I) dated 30/08/2006 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the

employer i.e. management of Hendegir Colliery of M/s BCCL, Ranchi and their workman through President,

N.C.O.E.A., Hendegir, Ranchi for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the demand of the NCOEA from the management of CCL, Hendegir Colliery to give

employment to Sri. Jai Nandan Ganjhu the dependent of the deceased workman Shri Late Bahura

Ganjhu as per the provision of NCWA-V is justified? If so, to what relief is the said dependent entitled?‖

2. On receiving order no. L-20012/585/2001-IR(CM-I) dated 30/08/2006 Government of India, Ministry of

Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 77 of 2006 was registered on 15.09.2006

and thereafter the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements

along with relevant documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

3. After receipt of the reference on 15.09.2006, this case record was put up after a long gap on 20.12.2021 and

registered notices were sent to both the parties and both parties appeared on 14.03.2022 but thereafter

workman/union failed to appear before this Tribunal. However Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate on behalf of the

management appeared.

4. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that workman/union never appeared before this Tribunal since

April, 2022 which shows that the workman/union has lost his interest in this case and therefore, for the ends of

justice, this case deserves to be dismissed for non prosecution.

5. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 13 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 370.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj बीसीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-

सह

-

]

-I ds iapkV (

72/2014) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/63/2014-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 13th March, 2026

S.O. 370.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 72/2014) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

BCCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026.

[No. L-20012/63/2014– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1657

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 72/2014

Parties:

Employer in relation to the management of C.V. Area

Of M/s. BCCL, Barakar, Burdwan

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Sri S. Goswami, Asstt. Manager (L)

For the workman :- None.

State : West Bengal.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 06/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.L-

20012/63/2014 -IR(CM-I) dated 07/07/2014 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer i.e.

management of C.V. Area of M/s. BCCL, Barakar, Burdwan and their workman through Secretary, Janta Mazdoor

Sangh, Barakar, Burdwan for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the Management of C.V. Area of M/s BCCL in not regularizing of S/Sri Goutam

Bouri and 19 others in the post of Mobile Crusher Mazdoor/feeder Breaker Mazdoor is fair and justified? To

what relief the concerned workmen are entitled to ?‖

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India for

disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-20012/63/2014 -IR(CM-I) dated 07/07/2014 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 72 of 2014 was registered on 17.07.2014 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

4. After receipt of the reference on 17.07.2014, this case was put up after a long gap on 17.01.2022 and regd.

notices were issued to both the parties but neither the workman nor the management appeared before this Tribunal.

Thereafter on 12.09.2025 Sri S.N. Ghosh, Advocate on behalf of the management appeared but workman/union again

failed to appear and after that management appeared on certain dates. Today Sri S. Goswami, Asstt. Manager (L) for

the management appeared and submitted that workman has not appeared since beginning in this case so case may be

closed.

5. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that workman/union never appeared before this Tribunal since

beginning which shows that he has lost his interest in this case and therefore, for the ends of justice, this case deserves

to be dismissed for non prosecution.

6. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 13 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 371.— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k

esa] dsUnzh; ljdkj सीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-सह-

] -I ds

1658

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

iapkV (

76/2006) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/580/2001-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 13th March, 2026

S.O. 371.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 76/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of CCL. and

their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026.

[No. L-20012/580/2001– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 76/2006

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of Hendegir Colliery

of M/s. CCL, Hendegir, Ranchi

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 06/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.

L-20012/580/2001-IR(CM-I) dated 30/08/2006 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer

i.e. management of Hendegir Colliery of M/s BCCL, Ranchi and their workman through President, N.C.O.E.A.,

Hendegir, Ranchi for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the demand of the NCOEA from the management of CCL, Hendegir Colliery to give

employment to Shri Babulal Munda the dependent of the deceased workman Shri Late Ledua Munda as per

the provision of NCWA-V is justified? If so, to what relief is the said dependent entitled?‖

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1659

2. On receiving order no. L-20012/580/2001-IR(CM-I) dated 30/08/2006 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 76 of 2006 was registered on 15.09.2006 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

3. After receipt of the reference on 15.09.2006, this case record was put up after a long gap on 20.12.2021 and

registered notices were sent to both the parties and both parties appeared on 14.03.2022 but thereafter workman/union

failed to appear before this Tribunal. However Sri D.K. Verma, Ld. Advocate on behalf of the management appeared.

4. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that workman/union never appeared before this Tribunal since

April, 2022 which shows that the workman/union has lost his interest in this case and therefore, for the ends of

justice, this case deserves to be dismissed for non prosecution.

5. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 13 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 372.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj बीसीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-सह-

] -I ds

iapkV (

167/2001) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/194/2001-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 13th March, 2026

S.O. 372.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 167/2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

BCCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026.

[No. L-20012/194/2001– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 167/2001

Parties:

Employer in relation to the management of Bastacolla Area

of M/s. BCCL, Jharia, Dhanbad

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Sri Sambharant Pandey, Sr. Manager (HR)

For the workman :- None.

1660

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 06/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.L-

20012/194/2001 -IR(C-I) dated 11/07/2001 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer i.e.

management of Bastacolla Area of M/s. BCCL, Dhanbad and their workman through President, Bihar Colliery

Kamgar Union, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―क्मा प्रफॊधन भै. बायत कोककॊग कोर लर. द् ाया श्रीभती ऩा मती भोदीन के फी. आय. एस. एप. के तहत

से ानन ृवि रेने ऩय उनके आचश्रत ऩुत्र को नौकयी न देना न्मामानमक, कानूनी तथा तकम दृक्ष्ट्ट से उचित है? मदद नहीॊ

तो कभमकाय अथ ा उनके आचश्रत ऩुत्र ककन राबों के हकदाय हैं?‖

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India for

disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-20012/194/2001 -IR(C-I) dated 11/07/2001 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 167 of 2001 was registered on 09.08.2001 and

thereafter the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with

relevant documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

4. After service of notice, both parties appeared previously and filed their authorities, W/S and subsequently

rejoinder. It further appears that after 2006 this case was put up after a long gap on 16.09.2021 and registered notices

were issued to both the parties but workman/union failed to appear before this Tribunal. However Sri D.K. Verma,

Advocate on behalf of the management appeared. Thereafter on 08.08.2025 regd. notice was again issued to

workman/union but he again failed to appear. Today Sri Sambharant Pandey, Sr. Manager (HR) on behalf of the

management appeared and submitted that workman is not present since long so case may be closed.

5. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that workman/union never appeared before this Tribunal since

November 2021 which shows that he has lost his interest in this case and therefore, for the ends of justice, this case

deserves to be dismissed for non prosecution.

6. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 13 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 373.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj एफसीअइ ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V

vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-सह-

] -I

ds iapkV

(

14/2004) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks

izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-22012/117/2003-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 13th March, 2026

S.O. 373.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 14/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

FCI and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026.

[No. L-22012/117/2003– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1661

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 14/2004

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of Food Corporation of India, Patna

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None.

For the workman :- None.

State : Bihar .

Industry:-Food & Public Distribution

Dated 05/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.

L-22012/117/2003 -IR(CM-II) dated 30/12/2003 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the

employer i.e. Food Corporation of India, Patna and their workman through Additional State Secretary, Food

Corporation of India Executive Staff Union, Patna for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in terminating the services of Sh.

Radhey Shyam Sharma and others instead of regularizing their services against category IV is legal and

justified? If not, to what relief the workmen are entitled?‖

LIST OF WORKMEN

Sl. No.

Name of Concerned workmen

Date

Engagement

Date

Retrenchment

Radhey Shyam Sharma

15.3.1986

01.01.1987

Ram Pravesh Sharma

―

Dilip Kumar

―

Ashok Kumar

―

Jainendra Kumar

―

Subodh Kumar

―

Shashi Kant

―

Raju Kumar

―

Sachidanand

―

10.

Niranjan Kumar

―

11.

Gorakhnath Rai

―

12.

Rakesh Kumar

―

13.

Amarendra Kumar

―

14.

Dinesh Rai

―

15.

Uma Shankar Kumar

―

16.

Vinod Kumar

―

17.

Mantoo Kumar

―

18.

Jitendra Kumar

―

19.

Umesh Singh

―

20.

Rajeshwar Sharma

―

21.

Som Nath

05.1.1987

16.11.87

22.

Ajeet Kumar Pandey

―

23.

Ranjay Kumar

―

24.

Sanjay Kumar

―

25.

Satyendra Kumar

―

26.

Sanjeet Kumar

―

27.

Pankaj Kumar

―

1662

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

28.

Vijay Kumar

―

29.

Kaushlendra Ranjan

―

30.

Shyam Sunder Kumar

―

31.

Randhir Kumar

―

32.

Dhananjay Kumar

―

33.

Phuldeo Paswan

―

34.

Arun Kumar Singh

―

35.

Upendra Kumar

―

36.

Sunil Kumar

―

37.

Manoj Kumar

―

38.

Kundan Kumar

―

39.

Chhotu Kumar

01.12.87

24.3.89

40.

Lalit Kumar

―

41.

Sanjeev Kumar

―

42.

Shambhoo Kumar

―

43.

Amar Kumar

―

44.

Wakil Kumar

―

45.

Jeetendra Kumar

―

46.

Manoj Kumar

―

47.

Rajeshwar Singh

―

48.

Prabhat Kumar

―

49.

Neeraj Kumar

―

50.

Ameet Kumar

―

51.

Arun Kumar

―

52.

Deepak Kumar

―

53.

Manoranjan

―

54.

Prashant Kumar

―

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India for

disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-22012/117/2003 -IR(CM-II) dated 30/12/2003 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 14 of 2004 was registered on 04.02.2004 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

4. After receipt of the reference both the parties appeared and filed their authorities, W/S and subsequently

rejoinder and after 01.09.2022 workman/union failed to appear before this Tribunal. However management appeared

on certain dates.

5. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that workman/union failed to appear before this Tribunal since

October 2022 which shows that he has lost his interest in this case and therefore, for the ends of justice, this case

deserves to be dismissed for non prosecution.

6. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 13 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 374.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa]

dsUnzh; ljdkj बीसीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa

fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-सह-

] -I ds

iapkV (

25/2007) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/13/2007-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1663

New Delhi, the 13th March, 2026

S.O. 374.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 25/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

BCCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026.

[No. L-20012/13/2007– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 25/2007

Parties:

Employer in relation to the management of Bastacolla Area

Of M/s. BCCL, Jharia, Dhanbad

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Sri S. Pandey, Sr. Manager (HR)

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 06/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order No.

L-20012/13/2007-IR(CM-I) dated 13/17.04.2007 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the

employer i.e. management of Bastacolla Area of M/s. BCCL, Dhanbad and their workman through Executive

Member, Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union, Bhuli, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the management of Bastacolla Colliery of M/s BCCL in dismissing Shri Gura

Manjhi, M/Loader from the services of the company w.e.f. 25.7.2005 is justified and legal? If not, to what relief

is the concerned workman entitled?‖

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India for

disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-20012/13/2007-IR(CM-I) dated 13/17.04.2007 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 25 of 2007 was registered on 01.05.2007 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

4. After receipt of the reference on 01.05.2007, this case was put up after a long gap on 06.01.2022 and regd.

notices were issued to both the parties but neither the workman nor the management appeared before this Tribunal.

Thereafter on 08.08.2025 and 12.12.2025 Sri N. Nath, O.S. Legal, H.Q and Sri Raju Kumar Mahto appeared on

behalf of the management but workman/union again failed to appear. Today Sri S. Pandey, Sr. Manager (HR) for the

management appeared and submitted that workman has not appeared since beginning in this case so case may be

closed.

5. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that workman/union never appeared before this Tribunal since

beginning which shows that he has lost his interest in this case and therefore, for the ends of justice, this case deserves

to be dismissed for non prosecution.

6. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

1664

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नइ ददल्ली, 13 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 375.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;

ljdkj बीसीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-सह-

] धनबाद-I ds iapkV (

20/2003) dks izdkf”kr

djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/99/2002-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 13th March, 2026

S.O. 375.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 20/2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of BCCL.

and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026.

[No. L-20012/99/2002– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 20/2003

Parties:

Employer in relation to the management of Bastacolla Area

Of M/s. BCCL, Jharia, Dhanbad

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Sri S. Pandey, Sr. Manager (HR)

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 06/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order

No.L-20012/99/2002-IR(C-I) dated 24/01/2003 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer

i.e. management of Bastacolla Area of M/s. BCCL, Dhanbad and their workman through Organizing Secretary,

Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the management of CIL;BCCL, CCO Dhansar, Bastacola Area &

Headquarters of BCCL;CMPDIL Ranchi, - R&D Construction Rajrappa; in not paying wages, annual

increment and other dues to Shri S.K. Pandey, Sampling Assistant for the period from 20.4.94 to 6/99

is just, fair and legal? If not to what relief is the workman entitled? And ;

Whether the demand of RCMS, from the management of BCCL, Bastacolla Area for promotion of the

workman from Cat.II to appropriate higher grade is just and fair? If so, to what relief is the workman

entitled?‖

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1665

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India for

disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-20012/99/2002-IR(C-I) dated 24/01/2003 Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New

Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 20 of 2003 was registered on 05.02.2003 and thereafter the

notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

4. After receipt of the reference on 05.02.2003, this case was put up after a long gap on 16.08.2021 and regd.

notices were issued to both the parties but neither the workman nor the management appeared and notice of the

workman/union returned with endorsement ―Always Door Locked Addressee Left‖. Thereafter on 27.06.2025 Sri

Rishi Raj Meena, Legal Inspector appeared on behalf of the management but workman/union again failed to appear.

Thereafter management appeared on certain dates. Today Sri S. Pandey, Sr. Manager (HR) for the management

appeared and submitted that workman has not appeared since beginning in this case so case may be closed.

5. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that workman/union never appeared before this Tribunal since

beginning which shows that he has lost his interest in this case and therefore, for the ends of justice, this case deserves

to be dismissed for non prosecution.

6. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 13 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 376.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;

ljdkj बीसीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-सह-

] धनबाद-I ds iapkV (

09/2016) dks izdkf”kr

djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/431/2001-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 13th March, 2026

S.O. 376.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 09/2016) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

BCCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026

[No. L-20012/431/2001– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 09/2016

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of Bastacolla Area

of M/s. BCCL, Jharia, Dhanbad

AND

Their Workman

1666

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Sri Sambharant Pandey, Sr. Manager, H.R.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 06/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order

No.L-20012/137/2015 -IR(CM-I) dated 15/12/2015 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the

employer i.e. management of Bastacolla Area of M/s. BCCL, Jharia, Dhanbad and their workman through Central

Secretary, Jharkhand Colliery Mazdoor Union, Jeenagora, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the Management of Dobari Colliery under Bastacolla Area of M/s. BCCL in

dismissing Shri Umesh Mohali, Ex-Miner Loader, Pers. No. 03039484 from the services on 21.02.2006

vide letter No. Dobari/09/056/143 of the company is fair and justified? To what relief the concerned

workman is entitled to?‖

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India for

disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-20012/137/2015 -IR(CM-I) dated 15/12/2015 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 09 of 2016 was registered on 04.01.2016 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

4. After receipt of the reference regd. notices were issued to both the parties and both parties appeared previously

and filed their authorities and W/S but after 19.09.2019 workman/union failed to appear before this Tribunal.

However management appeared on certain dates. Today Sri Sambharant Pandey, Sr. Manager (HR) appeared and

submitted that workman has not appeared since October 2019, so case may be closed.

5. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that the workman never appeared before this Tribunal since

October 2019 which shows that he has lost his interest in this case and therefore, for the ends of justice, this case

deserves to be dismissed for non prosecution.

6. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 13 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 377.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;

ljdkj सीसीएल ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa

-सह-

] धनबाद-I ds iapkV (

45/2002) dks izdkf”kr

djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/533/2001-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1667

New Delhi, the 13th March, 2026

S.O. 377.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 45/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

CCL. and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026.

[No. L-20012/533/2001– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 45/2002

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of Giridih Area

Of M/s. CCL, Giridih

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Coal

Dated 04/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order

No.L-20012/533/2001 -IR(C-I) dated 01/03/2002 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the

employer i.e. management of Giridih Area of M/s. CCL, Giridih and their workman through Regional Secretary,

United Coal Workers Union, Giridih for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the management of CCL in refusing to regularize Sri Gautam Kumar Pandey,

Cat-I worker as Helper in Excvn cadre w.e.f. 1993 and thereafter as EP fitter/Drill Operator is fair

and justified? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from what date ?‖

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India for

disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-20012/533/2001- IR(C-I) dated 01/03/2002 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 45 of 2002 was registered on 21.03.2002 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

4. After receipt of the reference on 21.03.2002, this case was put up after a long gap on 02.08.2021 and regd.

notices were issued to both the parties but workman/union failed to appear before this Tribunal. However Sri D.K.

Verma, Ld. Advocate on behalf of the management appeared.

5. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that workman/union never appeared before this Tribunal since

2021 which shows that he has lost his interest in this case and therefore, for the ends of justice, this case deserves to

be dismissed for non prosecution.

6. Hence,

1668

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 13 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 378.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;

ljdkj दामोदर वजली कॉृोरेिन ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd

fookn esa

-सह-

]

धनबाद-I

ds iapkV (

11/2003) dks izdkf”kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks

dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[सं. एल-20012/517/2002-अइअर-(सीएम-I)]

ियदीृ यादव, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 13th March, 2026

S.O. 378.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 11/2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-

cum-Labour Court, Dhanbad-I as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Management of

Damodar Vallery Corporation and their workmen received by the Central Government on 09/03/2026

[No. L-20012/517/2002– IR (CM-I)]

JAIDEEP YADAV, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 11/2003

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of Damodar Valley

Corporation, Kolkata

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None.

For the workman :- None.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Power

Dated 05/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order

No.L-42012/51/2002 -IR(CM-II) dated 06/01/2003 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the

employer i.e. management of Damodar Valley Corporation, Kolkata and their workman through Secretary, United

Coal Workers Union, Bokaro Thermal, Bokaro for adjudication by this Tribunal:

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1669

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the management of D.V.C. in not providing employment on regular basis to

the 11 contractor‘s workers (list enclosed) is legal and justified? If not, to what relief they are entitled

to?‖

List of workmen

क्रम स.

नाम

जृता/ृजत का नाम

आ. ृी. एफ. न.

मदन झा

नन्द झा

5160

रजवलोर्न बनिी

ए. के. बनिी

5071

ृवन कुमार झा

ए. एन. झा.

4350

श्रवण कुमार झा

ए. एन. झा.

4976

आंरकांत राय

ए. राय

4784

रािू घााँषी

दुजलया घााँषी

5126

र्ंदू राम

तृसी राम

5083

श्रीमती मजण देवी

गुलेश्वर ईरााँव

5131

बजधनाथ प्रसाद

िोधी प्रसाद

5078

10.

रािेन्र प्रसाद ससह

डी. एन. ससह

4756

11.

जवकलांग

रोस्ट्टर के अधार ृर

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India for

disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-42012/51/2002- IR(CM-II) dated 06/01/2003 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 11 of 2003 was registered on 21.01.2003 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

4. After receipt of the reference on 21.01.2003, this case was put up after a long gap on 17.09.2021 and regd.

notices were issued to both the parties and Sri Somnath Chakraborty, Advocate appeared on behalf of the

management on 06.12.2021 but workman/union failed to appear before this Tribunal. After that management also

failed to appear. Thereafter on 29.08.2025 regd. notices were again issued to both the parties and Sri Kaushal Kumar,

Advocate for the management appeared but workman/union again failed to appear.

5. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that workman/union never appeared before this Tribunal since

beginning which shows that he has lost his interest in this case and therefore, for the ends of justice, this case deserves

to be dismissed for non prosecution.

6. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 16 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 379.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 (a1947 dk 14 ) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj

ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjks ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V औद्योजगक fookn

esa dsUnzh; ljdkj औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;

ds iapkV (48/2017-18) izdkf”kr djrh gSA

[सं. एल-12011/39/2017-अइ अर (ch-I)]

सलोनी, ईृ जनदेिक

1670

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 16th March, 2026

S.O. 379.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 48/2017-18) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India

their workmen.

[No. L-12011/39/2017- IR(B-I)]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI SHIV SHANKER PRASAD PRESIDING OFFICER,

CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR

Case No.CGIT/NGP/48/2017-18

Date:06.02.2026.

Party No.1:

The Chief General Manager,

State Bank of India, P & HRD, IR Cell,

Local Head Office, Synergy, C-6, G Block,

Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East)

Mumbai - 400051

The Dy. General Manager,

State Bank of India, Zonal Office, Zone-I,

S.V. Patel Marg, Kingsway,

Nagpur - 440001

V/s.

Party No.2: The Dy. General Manager,

State Bank Karmachari Sena, (Nagpur Module),

C/o State Bank of India, Ramdaspeth Branch,

Nagpur

AWARD

(Dated:6^thFebruary, 2026)

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (―the Act‖ in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial

dispute between the employers, in relation to the managementof State Bank of Indiaand the Union of State Bank

Karmachari Sena, (Nagpur Module), for adjudication, as per No. L-12011/39/2017 (IR(B-I)) dated 01.02.2018, with

the following schedule: -

―Whether action of the management of State Bank of India, Local Head Office, Mumbai through its

Chief General Manager and State Bank of India Zonal Office, Zone-I, Nagpur Through its Dy.

General Manager to implement the transfers under redeployment policy without taking into

consideration the data of branch wise access/ shortage staff along with the criteria adopted to arrive at

such figure as well as the appointment of the new recruits and merger of associate banks in State Bank

of India is fair, just or legal? If not, to what relief the concerned Unionis entitled to? And what are the

other directions necessary in the matter?

Case is called out. Learned counsel for the respondent Shri. Dadu Sachadeva is present before the court but

no one is present on behalf of petitioner despite service of notice. On the previous date learned counsel for the Party

No. 2, Mr. Marpakwar has filed a pursis wherein he has mentioned that despite repeated attempts to contact by a

phone calls and latter to client he has failed to provide necessary instructions to proceed further in the present matter.

In these circumstances, he has withdrawn his power on the previous date. From perusal of record, it is apparent that

this reference has been received to this court on 16.02.2018. Although Statement of Claim and Written Statement as

well as rejoinder have been filed by the parties respectively but no evidence has been filed by the petitioner to prove

his case. Therefore, it appears that petitioner is not interested to contest the case further more. No other evidence has

been filed by the petitioner to prove the contents of the claim. Claim of the petitioner is not proved.So, it is closed.

Hence, it is ordered.

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1671

ORDER

―The action of the management of State Bank of India, Local Head Office, Mumbai through its Chief

General Manager and State Bank of India Zonal Office, Zone-I, Nagpur Through its Dy. General Manager to

implement the transfers under redeployment policy without taking into consideration the data of branch wise

access/ shortage staff along with the criteria adopted to arrive at such figure as well as the appointment of the

new recruits and merger of associate banks in State Bank of India is fair, just or legal. The union is not entitled

to any relief.‖

Justice (Retd.) SHIV SHANKER PRASAD, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 16 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 380.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (a1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj

ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V औद्योजगक fookn

esa dsUnzh; ljdkj औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;

ds iapkV (49/2017-18) izdkf”kr djrh gSA

[सं. एल-12011/37/2017-अइअर-(बी-I)]

सलोनी, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 16th March, 2026

S.O. 380.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 49/2017-18) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India

their workmen.

[No. L-12011/37/2017- IR(B-I)]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI SHIV SHANKER PRASAD PRESIDING OFFICER,

CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR

Case No.CGIT/NGP/49/2017-18

Date:03.02.2026

Party No.1:

1) The Dy. General Manager,

State Bank of India, Zone -I,

Zonal Office, Kingsway, S.V. Patel Marg,

Nagpur – 440001

2) The Chief Manager, State Bank of India,

Kamptee Branch, Distt. Kamptee,

Nagpur – 441002

V/s.

Party No.2: The Dy. General Secretary State Bank Karmachari Sena

(Nagpur Module) C/o. State Bank of India,

Nagpur Main Branch, SV Patel Marg,

Kingsway, Nagpur - 440001.

1676

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नइ ददल्ली, 16 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 381.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (a1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj

ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V औद्योजगक fookn

esa dsUnzh; ljdkj औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;

ds iapkV (61/2014-15) izdkf”kr djrh gSA

[सं. एल-12011/98/2014-अइ अर (ch-I)]

सलोनी, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 16th March, 2026

S.O. 381.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref.61/2014-15) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court

Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India

their workmen.

[No. L-12011/98/2014- IR(B-I)]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI SHIV SHANKER PRASAD PRESIDING OFFICER,

CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR

Case No.CGIT/NGP/61/2014-15

Date:03.02.2026.

Party No.1: 1) The Assistant General Manager,

State Bank of India, Region-III, Zonal-I,

Zonal Office, Nagpur, Kingsway,

S.V. Patel Marg, Nagpur - 440001

2) The Chief Manager, State Bank of India,

Kamptee Branch, Kamptee,

Distt. Nagpur – 441002

3) The Chief General Manager,

State Bank of India, Local Head Office,

Synergy, C-6 Block, Bandra Kurla Complex,

Bandra (East), Mumbai – 400051.

V/s.

Party No.2: The Dy. General Secretary State Bank Karmachari Sena

(Nagpur Module) C/o. State Bank of India,

Nagpur Main Branch, SV Patel Marg,

Kingsway, Nagpur- 440001.

AWARD

(Dated:3^rd February, 2026)

In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (d) of sub-section (1) and Sub-section 2(A)of Section 10 of

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (―the Act‖ in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial

dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of State Bank of India through its Dy. General

Manager, Nagpur and Chief Manager, Kamptee Branch and the applicant,Shri. R. P. Shuklafor adjudication

No. L-12011/98/2014 (IR(B-I)) dt.22.01.2025, with the following issues framed: -

―Whether theaction of the management of State Bank Karmachari Sena (Nagpur Module) against the

management of State Bank of India deducting an amount of Rs. 17,825/- towards loss of pay and not

allowing encashment of 15 days privilege leave of Shri. R. P. Shukla,Armed Guard, SBI Branch

Kamptee is legal, just and proper?If not, to what relief to the workman concerned is entitled to?‖

1680

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

नइ ददल्ली, 16 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 382.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (a1947 dk 14 ) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh;

ljdkj बैंक ऑफ आंजडया ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdks vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V औद्योजगक fookn esa

dsUnzh; ljdkj औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;

ds iapkV (a96/2006) izdkf”kr djrh gSA

[सं. एल-12011/80/2006-अइअर-(ch-II)]

सलोनी, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 16th March, 2026

S.O. 382.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 96/2006) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No.

1,Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Bank of India their

workmen.

[No. L-12011/80/2006- IR(B-II)]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 96/2006

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of Bank of India, Kerkend

Branch, Kusunda, Dhanbad

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None.

For the workman :- Sri Pradeep Kr. Singh, Secretary

State : Jharkhand.

Industry:-Bank

Dated 06/02/2026

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order

No.L-12011/80/2006-IR(B-II) dated 13/11/2006 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer

i.e. management of Bank of India, Kerkend Branch, Dhanbad and their workman through Working President,

Jharkhand Colliery Mazdoor Union, Dhanbad for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the claim of employment of Shri Kamakhya Narayan Tiwari that he was engaged by the

management of Bank of India as a Peon during the period from September, 2001 to 21.09.2004 is

correct, If so, whether the action of the management in terminating him from service thereafter is

legal and justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled?‖

2. On receiving order no. L-12011/80/2006-IR(B-II) dated 13/11/2006 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 96 of 2006 was registered on 28.11.2006 and thereafter

the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with relevant

documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

[भाग II—खण् ड 3(ii)]

भारत का रािृत्र : मार्च 21, 2026/फाल् गुन 30, 1947

1681

3. After receipt of the reference on 28.11.2006, this case record was put up after a long gap on 20.12.2021 and

registered notices were sent to both the parties and on 02.06.2022 and 14.07.2022 Sri Sadhu Sharan Pd.,

Representative on behalf of the workman appeared but management failed to appear thereafter workman also failed to

appear before this Tribunal. Later on 22.08.2025 and 24.10.2025 Sri Pradeep Kumar Singh, Secretary of the union

appeared and submitted that concerned workman is not interested to contest this case so case may be closed.

4. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that workman/union has lost his interest in this case and

therefore, for the ends of justice, this case deserves to be dismissed for non prosecution.

5. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

नइ ददल्ली, 16 मार्च, 2026

का.अ. 383.—औद्योजगक fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (a1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

dsujk बैंक ds izca/kr=] lac) fu;kstdkas vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V औद्योजगक fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj

औद्योजगक vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;

ds iapkV (a105/2003) izdkf”kr djrh gSA

[सं. एल-20012/105/2003-अइअर-(ch-II)]

सलोनी, ईृ जनदेिक

New Delhi, the 16th March, 2026

S.O. 383.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 105/2003) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No.

1,Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Canara Bank

their workmen.

[No. L-12012/105/2003- IR(B-II)]

SALONI, Dy. Director

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d)& (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference Case No. 105/2003

Parties:

Employer in relation to the management of Canara Bank, Patna

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey

Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None.

For the workman :- None.

State : Bihar.

Industry:-Bank

Dated 06/02/2026

1682

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, 2026/PHALGUNA 30, 1947

[PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AWARD.

In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947),Government Of India through the Ministry of Labour, vide its Order

No.L-12012/105/2003-IR(B-II) dated 18/09/2003 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the

employer i.e. management of Canara Bank, Patna and their workman Smt. Asha Devi for adjudication by this

Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

―Whether the action of the management of Canara Bank in terminating the service of Smt. Asha Devi

is legal and justified? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled?‖

2. This case is taken through Special Campaign organized by Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India for

disposal of pending cases.

3. On receiving order no. L-12012/105/2003-IR(B-II) dated 18/09/2003 Government of India, Ministry of Labour,

New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, Reference case no. 105 of 2003 was registered on 07/13.10.2003 and

thereafter the notices were sent to the parties with a direction to appear and submit their written statements along with

relevant documents and witnesses in support of their claims.

4. After receipt of the reference on 07/13.10.2003, this case was put up after a long gap on 17.09.2021 and regd.

notices were issued to both the parties but neither the workman nor the management appeared before this Tribunal

and notice of the workman/union returned with endorsement ―प्राप्तकर्ाा का पर्ा नहीं चलने के कारण वापस”.

5. On perusal of the entire case record it transpires that both the parties never appeared before this Tribunal since

beginning which shows that both the parties have lost their interest in this case and therefore, for the ends of justice,

this case deserves to be dismissed for non prosecution.

6. Hence,

ORDERED

that this case is hereby dismissed for non prosecution and a ―No Dispute Award‖ be drawn up in respect of the

above reference case. Let the copies of Award in duplicate be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Government of India, New Delhi for information and notification.

SACHINDRA KUMAR PANDEY, Presiding Officer

Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.

SARVESH KUMAR

SRIVASTAVA

Digitally signed by SARVESH KUMAR

SRIVASTAVA

Date: 2026.04.11 15:51:11 +05'30'