¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
÷ʪ v ]
609
∑˝§◊Ê¢∑§ xÆ ]
⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, ‡ÊÈ∑˝§flÊ⁄U, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆóüÊÊfláÊ w, ‡Ê∑§ v~yw
÷ʪ 1
⁄UÊíÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∑§ •ÊŒ‡Ê
‚Ê◊Êãÿ ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ Áfl÷ʪ
◊¢òÊÊ‹ÿ, ◊„UÊŸŒË ÷flŸ, ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄
ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w{ ◊߸U wÆwÆ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ ߸U v-Æw/wÆwÆ/∞∑§-w.ó⁄UÊíÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∞ÃŒ˜mÊ⁄UÊ «UÊÚ. •Ê‹Ê∑§ ‡ÊÈÄ‹Ê, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (v~}{), ¬˝◊Èπ ‚Áøfl, S∑ͧ‹ Á‡ÊˇÊÊ Áfl÷ʪ
ÃÕÊ •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U •äÿˇÊ, ¿U.ª. ◊ÊäÿÁ◊∑§ Á‡ÊˇÊÊ ◊¥«U‹ ÃÕÊ •äÿˇÊ, ¿U.ª. √ÿÊfl‚ÊÁÿ∑§ ¬⁄UˡÊÊ ◊¥«U‹ ∑§Ê ©UŸ∑§ flø◊ÊŸ ∑§Ã¸√ÿÊ¥ ∑§ ‚ÊÕ-
‚ÊÕ ¬˝◊Èπ ‚Áøfl, ∑§Ê҇ʋ Áfl∑§Ê‚, Ã∑§ŸË∑§Ë Á‡ÊˇÊÊ ∞fl¥ ⁄UÊ¡ªÊ⁄U Áfl÷ʪ ∑§Ê •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚ÊÒ¥¬ÃÊ „ÒU.
w.
üÊË •Á◊ÃÊ÷ ¡ÒŸ, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (v~}~), •¬⁄U ◊ÈÅÿ ‚Áøfl, ÁflûÊ Áfl÷ʪ ÃÕÊ •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U •¬⁄U ◊ÈÅÿ ‚Áøfl, ‹Ê∑§ ÁŸ◊ʸáÊ Áfl÷ʪ
∑§Ê ∑§fl‹ •¬⁄U ◊ÈÅÿ ‚Áøfl, ‹Ê∑§ ÁŸ◊ʸáÊ Áfl÷ʪ ∑§ •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚ ◊ÈÄà ∑§⁄Uà „ÈU∞ •¬⁄U ◊ÈÅÿ ‚Áøfl, ¡‹ ‚¥‚ÊäÊŸ Áfl÷ʪ ∑§Ê •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄÃ
¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚ÊÒ¥¬ÃÊ „ÒU. ‡Ê· ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ÿÕÊflØ ⁄U„UªÊ.
‚¢øÊ‹∑§, ◊Ⱥ˝áÊ ÃÕÊ ‹πŸ ‚Ê◊ª˝Ë, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U mÊ⁄UÊ ‡ÊÊ‚∑§Ëÿ ˇÊòÊËÿ ◊Ⱥ˝áÊÊ‹ÿ, ⁄UÊ¡ŸÊ¢ŒªÊ¢fl ‚ ◊ÈÁº˝Ã ÃÕÊ ¬˝∑§ÊÁ‡ÊÃówÆwÆ.
¬¢¡ËÿŸ ∑˝§◊Ê¢∑§
“¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U/ŒÈª¸/Æ~/wÆvx-wÆvz.”
“Á’¡Ÿ‚ ¬ÊS≈U ∑§ •ãê¸Ã «UÊ∑§
‡ÊÈÀ∑§ ∑§ ŸªŒ ÷ȪÃÊŸ (Á’ŸÊ «UÊ∑§
Á≈U∑§≈U) ∑§ ¬˝·áÊ „UÃÈ •ŸÈ◊Ã. ∑˝§◊Ê¢∑§
¡Ë. w-ww-¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ª¡≈U/x} Á‚.
‚. Á÷‹Ê߸, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ xÆ-z-wÆÆv.”
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ
¬˝ÊÁœ∑§Ê⁄U ‚ ¬˝∑§ÊÁ‡ÊÃ
Áfl·ÿó‚ÍøË
÷ʪ v.ó(v) ⁄UÊÖÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∑§ •ÊŒ‡Ê, (w) Áfl÷ʪ ¬˝◊ÈπÊ¥ ∑§ •ÊŒ‡Ê,
(x) ©Uëø ãÿÊÿÊ‹ÿ ∑§ •ÊŒ‡Ê •ÊÒ⁄U •Áœ‚ÍøŸÊ∞¢, (y)
⁄UÊÖÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∑§ ‚¢∑§À¬, (z) ÷Ê⁄Uà ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∑§ •ÊŒ‡Ê •ÊÒ⁄U
•Áœ‚ÍøŸÊ∞¢, ({) ÁŸflʸøŸ •Êÿʪ, ÷Ê⁄Uà ∑§Ë •Áœ‚ÍøŸÊ∞¢,
(|) ‹Ê∑§-÷Ê·Ê ¬Á⁄UÁ‡ÊCÔU.
÷ʪ w.óSÕÊŸËÿ ÁŸ∑§Êÿ ∑§Ë •Áœ‚ÍøŸÊ∞¢.
÷ʪ x.ó(v) ÁflôÊʬŸ •ÊÒ⁄U ÁflÁflœ ‚ÍøŸÊ∞¢, (w) ‚Ê¢ÁÅÿ∑§Ëÿ
‚ÍøŸÊ∞¢.
÷ʪ y.ó(∑§) (v) ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U Áflœÿ∑§, (w) ¬˝fl⁄U ‚Á◊Áà ∑§
¬˝ÁÃflŒŸ, (x) ‚¢‚Œ ◊¥ ¬È⁄U—SÕÊÁ¬Ã Áflœÿ∑§, (π) (v)
•äÿÊŒ‡Ê, (w) ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U •ÁœÁŸÿ◊, (x) ‚¢‚Œ˜Ô ∑§
•ÁœÁŸÿ◊, (ª) (v) ¬˝ÊM§¬ ÁŸÿ◊, (w) •¢ÁÃ◊ ÁŸÿ◊.
{Æ~
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
[ ÷ʪ v
610
x.
üÊË◊ÃË ⁄‘UáÊÈ ¡Ë Á¬À‹, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (v~~v), •¬⁄U ◊ÈÅÿ ‚Áøfl, ∑§Ê҇ʋ Áfl∑§Ê‚, Ã∑§ŸË∑§Ë Á‡ÊˇÊÊ ∞fl¥ ⁄UÊ¡ªÊ⁄U Áfl÷ʪ ÃÕÊ •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄÃ
¬˝÷Ê⁄U ◊„UÊÁŸŒ‡Ê∑§, ¿U.ª. ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ •∑§ÊŒ◊Ë, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U ∑§Ê •¬⁄U ◊ÈÅÿ ‚Áøfl, ∑§Ê҇ʋ Áfl∑§Ê‚, Ã∑§ŸË∑§Ë Á‡ÊˇÊÊ ∞fl¥ ⁄UÊ¡ªÊ⁄U Áfl÷ʪ ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚ ◊ÈÄÃ
∑§⁄Uà „ÈU∞ •¬⁄U ◊ÈÅÿ ‚Áøfl, ÁøÁ∑§à‚Ê Á‡ÊˇÊÊ Áfl÷ʪ ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU. ‡Ê· ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ÿÕÊflØ ⁄U„UªÊ.
üÊË◊ÃË ⁄‘UáÊÈ ¡Ë Á¬À‹, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. mÊ⁄UÊ •¬⁄U ◊ÈÅÿ ‚Áøfl, ÁøÁ∑§à‚Ê Á‡ÊˇÊÊ Áfl÷ʪ ∑§Ê ∑§Êÿ¸÷Ê⁄U ª˝„UáÊ ∑§⁄UŸ ∑§ ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ ‚ üÊË◊ÃË
ÁŸ„UÊÁ⁄U∑§Ê ’ÊÁ⁄U∑§, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (v~~|), ‚Áøfl, ‹Ê∑§ SflÊSâÿ ∞fl¥ ¬Á⁄UflÊ⁄U ∑§ÀÿÊáÊ ÃÕÊ ÁøÁ∑§à‚Ê Á‡ÊˇÊÊ Áfl÷ʪ ∑§fl‹ ‚Áøfl, ÁøÁ∑§à‚Ê Á‡ÊˇÊÊ
Áfl÷ʪ ∑§ ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚ ◊ÈÄà „UÊ¥ªË.
y.
üÊË ◊ŸÊ¡ ∑ȧ◊Ê⁄U Á¬¥ªÈ•Ê, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (v~~y), ¬˝◊Èπ ‚Áøfl, flÊÁáÊíÿ ∞fl¥ ©Ulʪ ÃÕÊ ‚Êfl¸¡ÁŸ∑§ ©U¬∑˝§◊ Áfl÷ʪ ÃÕÊ •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U
Áfl‡Ê· ∑§Ã¸√ÿSÕ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË-‚„U-ÁŸfl‡Ê, •ÊÿÈÄÃ, ¿U.ª. ⁄UÊíÿ •ÊÒlÊÁª∑§ Áfl∑§Ê‚ ÁŸª◊ (CSIDC), (◊ÈÅÿÊ‹ÿ ÁŒÀ‹Ë) ÃÕÊ ¬˝◊Èπ ‚Áøfl,
flŸ Áfl÷ʪ ∑§Ê ©UŸ∑§ flø◊ÊŸ ∑§Ã¸√ÿÊ¥ ∑§ ‚ÊÕ-‚ÊÕ •ÊflÊ‚Ëÿ •ÊÿÈÄÃ, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ÷flŸ, Ÿß¸U ÁŒÀ‹Ë ∑§Ê •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚ÊÒ¥¬ÃÊ „ÒU.
üÊË ◊ŸÊ¡ ∑ȧ◊Ê⁄U Á¬¥ªÈ•Ê, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (v~~y) mÊ⁄UÊ •ÊflÊ‚Ëÿ •ÊÿÈÄÃ, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ÷flŸ, Ÿß¸U ÁŒÀ‹Ë ∑§Ê •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ∑§Êÿ¸÷Ê⁄U ª˝„UáÊ ∑§⁄UŸ
∑§ ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ ‚ «UÊÚ. ◊ÁŸãŒ⁄U ∑§ÊÒ⁄U ÁmflŒË, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (v~~z), ∑ΧÁ· ©Uà¬ÊŒŸ •ÊÿÈÄà ∞fl¥ ¬˝◊Èπ ‚Áøfl, ∑ΧÁ· ∞fl¥ ¡Òfl ¬˝ÊÒlÊÁª∑§Ë Áfl÷ʪ ÃÕÊ
•ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ¬˝◊Èπ ‚Áøfl, ª˝Ê◊Êlʪ Áfl÷ʪ ÃÕÊ •ÊflÊ‚Ëÿ •ÊÿÈÄÃ, ¿U.ª. ÷flŸ, Ÿß¸U ÁŒÀ‹Ë ∑§fl‹ •ÊflÊ‚Ëÿ •ÊÿÈÄÃ, ¿U.ª. ÷flŸ, Ÿß¸U
ÁŒÀ‹Ë ∑§ •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚ ◊ÈÄà „UÊ¥ªË. ‡Ê· ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ÿÕÊflØ ⁄U„UªÊ.
z.
üÊË ß¸UÁ◊‹ ‹∑§«∏Ê, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆx), •ÊÿÈÄÃ, ‚⁄UªÈ¡Ê ‚¥÷ʪ, •¥Á’∑§Ê¬È⁄U ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ‚Áøfl, ⁄UÊ¡Sfl
◊¥«U‹, Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄Uà „ÈU∞ ‚Áøfl, ‹Ê∑§ •Êÿʪ ∑§Ê •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚ÊÒ¥¬ÃÊ „ÒU.
{.
üÊË ÷⁄Uà ‹Ê‹ ’¥¡Ê⁄‘U, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆx), •ÊÿÈÄÃ, Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U ‚¥÷ʪ, Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ‚Áøfl,
◊¥òÊÊ‹ÿ ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
|.
üÊË ¬˝‚ãŸÊ •Ê⁄U., ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆy), ‚Áøfl, ‚„U∑§ÊÁ⁄UÃÊ Áfl÷ʪ ÃÕÊ •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚Áøfl, ‚◊Ê¡ ∑§ÀÿÊáÊ Áfl÷ʪ ∞fl¥ ‚Áøfl,
ÁflôÊÊŸ ∞fl¥ ¬˝ÊÒlÊÁª∑§Ë Áfl÷ʪ ÃÕÊ •ÊÿÈÄÃ, ÁŸ—‡ÊÄ០∑§Ê ©UŸ∑§ flø◊ÊŸ ∑§Ã¸√ÿÊ¥ ∑§ ‚ÊÕ-‚ÊÕ ‚Áøfl, ◊Á„U‹Ê ∞fl¥ ’Ê‹ Áfl∑§Ê‚ Áfl÷ʪ ÃÕÊ
‚Áøfl, ∑§Ê҇ʋ Áfl∑§Ê‚ Áfl÷ʪ ∑§Ê •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚ÊÒ¥¬ÃÊ „ÒU.
üÊË ¬˝‚ãŸÊ •Ê⁄U., ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆy), mÊ⁄UÊ ‚Áøfl, ◊Á„U‹Ê ∞fl¥ ’Ê‹ Áfl∑§Ê‚ Áfl÷ʪ ∑§Ê •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ∑§Êÿ¸÷Ê⁄U ª˝„UáÊ ∑§⁄UŸ ∑§ ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ ‚
üÊË ¬⁄UŒ‡ÊË Á‚hUÊÕ¸ ∑§Ê◊‹, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆx), ‚Áøfl, ‹Ê∑§ ÁŸ◊ʸáÊ Áfl÷ʪ ÃÕÊ •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚Áøfl, π‹ ∞fl¥ ÿÈflÊ ∑§ÀÿÊáÊ Áfl÷ʪ,
‚Áøfl, ◊Á„U‹Ê ∞fl¥ ’Ê‹ Áfl∑§Ê‚ Áfl÷ʪ, ÃÕÊ ¬˝’¥äÊ ‚¥øÊ‹∑§, ¿U.ª. S≈U≈U ⁄UÊ«U «U√„U‹¬◊¥≈U ∑§Ê¬Ê¸⁄‘U‡ÊŸ, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U ∑§fl‹ ‚Áøfl, ◊Á„U‹Ê ∞fl¥ ’Ê‹
Áfl∑§Ê‚ Áfl÷ʪ ∑§ •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚ ◊ÈÄà „UÊ¥ª. ‡Ê· ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ÿÕÊflØ ⁄U„UªÊ.
}.
üÊË •ã’‹ªŸ ¬Ë., ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆy), ‚Áøfl, πÁŸ¡ ‚ÊäÊŸ Áfl÷ʪ ÃÕÊ •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚Áøfl, ¬ÿ¸≈UŸ ∞fl¥ ‚¥S∑ΧÁà Áfl÷ʪ ∑§Ê
©UŸ∑§ flø◊ÊŸ ∑§Ã¸√ÿÊ¥ ∑§ ‚ÊÕ-‚ÊÕ ‚Áøfl, äÊÊÁ◊¸∑§ ãÿÊ‚ ∞fl¥ äÊ◊¸Sfl Áfl÷ʪ ∑§Ê •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚ÊÒ¥¬ÃÊ „ÒU.
~.
üÊË◊ÃË •‹⁄U◊‹◊¥ªß¸U «UË., ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆy), ‚Áøfl, Ÿª⁄UËÿ ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∞fl¥ Áfl∑§Ê‚ Áfl÷ʪ ÃÕÊ •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚Áøfl, ©UìÊ Á‡ÊˇÊÊ
Áfl÷ʪ ÃÕÊ ‚¥øÊ‹∑§, Ÿª⁄UËÿ ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∞fl¥ Áfl∑§Ê‚ ∑§Ê ©UŸ∑§ flø◊ÊŸ ∑§Ã¸√ÿÊ¥ ∑§ ‚ÊÕ-‚ÊÕ ‚Áøfl, Ã∑§ŸË∑§Ë Á‡ÊˇÊÊ ∞fl¥ ⁄UÊ¡ªÊ⁄U Áfl÷ʪ ∑§Ê
•ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚ÊÒ¥¬ÃÊ „ÒU.
vÆ.
«UÊÚ. ‚¥¡ÿ ∑ȧ◊Ê⁄U •‹¥ª, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆy), ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà •ÊÿÈÄÃ,
Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U ‚¥÷ʪ, Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄Uà „ÈU∞ •ÊÿÈÄÃ, ‚⁄UªÈ¡Ê ‚¥÷ʪ, •¥Á’∑§Ê¬È⁄U ∑§Ê •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚ÊÒ¥¬ÃÊ „ÒU.
vv.
üÊË ¿UûÊ⁄U Á‚¥„U «U„U⁄‘U, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆy), •¬⁄U •ÊÿÈÄÃ, Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U ‚¥÷ʪ ÃÕÊ •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚Áøfl, ⁄UÊ¡Sfl ◊¥«U‹, Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U ∞fl¥
‚Áøfl, ‹Ê∑§ •Êÿʪ ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-ªÁ⁄UÿÊ’¥Œ ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
vw.
üÊË ≈Uʬ‡fl⁄U fl◊ʸ, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆz), ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U Á¡‹Ê-Œ¥ÃflÊ«∏Ê ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-
⁄UÊ¡ŸÊ¥ŒªÊ¥fl ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
÷ʪ v ]
611
vx.
üÊË ŸË‹◊ ŸÊ◊Œfl ∞Ä∑§Ê, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆz), ◊ÈÅÿ ∑§Êÿ¸¬Ê‹Ÿ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U Áfl∑§Ê‚ ¬˝ÊÁäÊ∑§⁄UáÊ, ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË
M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ¬˝’¥äÊ ‚¥øÊ‹∑§, ¿U.ª. ⁄UÊíÿ „UÊÕ∑§⁄UÉÊÊ Áfl∑§Ê‚ ∞fl¥ Áfl¬áÊŸ ‚¥ÉÊ ◊ÿʸÁŒÃ, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
üÊË ŸË‹◊ ŸÊ◊Œfl ∞Ä∑§Ê, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. mÊ⁄UÊ ∑§Êÿ¸÷Ê⁄U ª˝„UáÊ ∑§⁄UŸ ∑§ ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ ‚ ¬˝’¥äÊ ‚¥øÊ‹∑§, ¿U.ª. ⁄UÊíÿ „UÊÕ∑§⁄UÉÊÊ Áfl∑§Ê‚ ∞fl¥
Áfl¬áÊŸ ‚¥ÉÊ ◊ÿʸÁŒÃ, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U ∑§ •‚¥flªË¸ÿ ¬Œ ∑§Ê ⁄UÊíÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ, ÷Ê⁄UÃËÿ ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚ÁŸ∑§ ‚flÊ (flß) ÁŸÿ◊Êfl‹Ë, wÆv{ ∑§ ÁŸÿ◊-vw ∑§ ÄUÃ
¬˝ÁÃDUÊ ∞fl¥ Á¡ê◊ŒÊ⁄UË ◊¥ ÷Ê⁄UÃËÿ ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚ÁŸ∑§ ‚flÊ ∑§ ¬˝fl⁄U üÊáÊË flß◊ÊŸ ∑§ ‚¥flªË¸ÿ ¬Œ ∑§ ‚◊∑§ˇÊ ÉÊÊÁ·Ã ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
üÊË ŸË‹◊ ŸÊ◊Œfl ∞Ä∑§Ê, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆz), mÊ⁄UÊ ¬˝’¥äÊ ‚¥øÊ‹∑§, ¿U.ª. ⁄UÊíÿ „UÊÕ∑§⁄UÉÊÊ Áfl∑§Ê‚ ∞fl¥ Áfl¬áÊŸ ‚¥ÉÊ ◊ÿʸÁŒÃ, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U
∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ∑§Êÿ¸÷Ê⁄U ª˝„UáÊ ∑§⁄UŸ ∑§ ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ ‚ üÊË „U◊¥Ã ¬„UÊ⁄‘U (‚.ÁŸ. ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. ‚¥ÁflŒÊ ÁŸÿÈÁÄÃ), ∑§fl‹ ¬˝’¥äÊ ‚¥øÊ‹∑§, ¿U.ª. ⁄UÊíÿ „UÊÕ∑§⁄UÉÊÊ
Áfl∑§Ê‚ ∞fl¥ Áfl¬áÊŸ ‚¥ÉÊ ◊ÿʸÁŒÃ, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U ∑§ ∑§Êÿ¸÷Ê⁄U ‚ ◊ÈÄà „UÊ¥ª. ‡Ê· ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ÿÕÊflØ ⁄U„UªÊ.
vy.
üÊË •¥Á∑§Ã •ÊŸ¥Œ, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆ{), ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê ŒÈª¸ ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ¬˝’¥äÊ ‚¥øÊ‹∑§, ¿U.ª. ⁄UÊíÿ
‚„U∑§Ê⁄UË Áfl¬áÊŸ ‚¥ÉÊ ◊ÿʸÁŒÃ (◊Ê∑¸§»§«U), ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄Uà „ÈU∞ ◊ÈÅÿ ∑§Êÿ¸¬Ê‹Ÿ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U Áfl∑§Ê‚
¬˝ÊÁäÊ∑§⁄UáÊ ∑§Ê •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚ÊÒ¥¬ÃÊ „ÒU.
üÊË •¥Á∑§Ã •ÊŸ¥Œ, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. mÊ⁄UÊ ∑§Êÿ¸÷Ê⁄U ª˝„UáÊ ∑§⁄UŸ ∑§ ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ ‚ ¬˝’¥äÊ ‚¥øÊ‹∑§, ¿U.ª. ⁄UÊíÿ ‚„U∑§Ê⁄UË Áfl¬áÊŸ ‚¥ÉÊ ◊ÿʸÁŒÃ
(◊Ê∑¸§»§«U), ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U ∑§ •‚¥flªË¸ÿ ¬Œ ∑§Ê ⁄UÊíÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ, ÷Ê⁄UÃËÿ ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚ÁŸ∑§ ‚flÊ (flß) ÁŸÿ◊Êfl‹Ë, wÆv{ ∑§ ÁŸÿ◊-vw ∑§ ÄUà ¬˝ÁÃDUÊ ∞fl¥
Á¡ê◊ŒÊ⁄UË ◊¥ ÷Ê⁄UÃËÿ ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚ÁŸ∑§ ‚flÊ ∑§ ¬˝fl⁄U üÊáÊË flß◊ÊŸ ∑§ ‚¥flªË¸ÿ ¬Œ ∑§ ‚◊∑§ˇÊ ÉÊÊÁ·Ã ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
vz.
üÊË ‚Ë. •Ê⁄U. ¬˝‚ãŸÊ, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆ{), ‚¥øÊ‹∑§, ¬‡ÊÈ ÁøÁ∑§à‚Ê ‚flÊÿ¥ ÃÕÊ •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U Áfl‡Ê· ‚Áøfl, ‹Ê∑§ SflÊSâÿ ∞fl¥
¬Á⁄UflÊ⁄U ∑§ÀÿÊáÊ Áfl÷ʪ ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà Áfl‡Ê· ‚Áøfl, ‹Ê∑§ SflÊSâÿ ∞fl¥ ¬Á⁄UflÊ⁄U ∑§ÀÿÊáÊ Áfl÷ʪ ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ
∑§⁄Uà „ÈU∞ •ÊÿÈÄÃ, SflÊSâÿ ‚flÊÿ¥ ÃÕÊ ¬˝’¥äÊ ‚¥øÊ‹∑§, ¿U.ª. ◊Á«U∑§‹ ‚Áfl¸‚¡ ∑§Ê¬Ê¸⁄‘U‡ÊŸ ∑§Ê •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚ÊÒ¥¬ÃÊ „ÒU.
v{.
üÊË ÷ÍflŸ‡Ê ÿÊŒfl, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆ{), •ÊÿÈÄÃ, SflÊSâÿ ‚flÊÿ¥ ÃÕÊ •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ¬˝’¥äÊ ‚¥øÊ‹∑§, ¿U.ª. ◊Á«U∑§‹ ‚Áfl¸‚¡
∑§Ê¬Ê¸⁄‘U‡ÊŸ ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà Áfl‡Ê· ‚Áøfl, ª˝Ê◊Êlʪ Áfl÷ʪ ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
üÊË ÷ÍflŸ‡Ê ÿÊŒfl, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆ{) mÊ⁄UÊ Áfl‡Ê· ‚Áøfl, ª˝Ê◊Êlʪ Áfl÷ʪ ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ∑§Êÿ¸÷Ê⁄U ª˝„UáÊ ∑§⁄UŸ ∑§ ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ ‚ üÊË „U◊¥Ã
¬„UÊ⁄‘U (‚.ÁŸ. ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. ‚¥ÁflŒÊ ÁŸÿÈÁÄÃ), ∑§fl‹ ‚Áøfl, ª˝Ê◊Êlʪ Áfl÷ʪ ∑§ ∑§Êÿ¸÷Ê⁄U ‚ ◊ÈÄà „UÊ¥ª.
v|.
‚ÈüÊË ‡Êê◊Ë •ÊÁ’ŒË, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆ|), ¬˝’¥äÊ ‚¥øÊ‹∑§, ¿U.ª. ⁄UÊíÿ ‚„U∑§Ê⁄UË Áfl¬áÊŸ ‚¥ÉÊ ◊ÿʸÁŒÃ (◊Ê∑¸§»§«U), ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U ∑§Ê
•SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ‚¥øÊ‹∑§, •ÊÁŒ◊¡ÊÁà ÃÕÊ •ŸÈ‚ÍÁøà ¡ÊÁà Áfl∑§Ê‚ ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
v}.
üÊË Á„U◊Á‡Êπ⁄U ªÈåÃÊ, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆ|), ¬¥¡Ëÿ∑§, ‚„U∑§Ê⁄UË ‚¥SÕÊÿ¥ ÃÕÊ •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚¥øÊ‹∑§, ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ •∑§ÊŒ◊Ë ∑§Ê ©UŸ∑§
flø◊ÊŸ ∑§Ã¸√ÿÊ¥ ∑§ ‚ÊÕ-‚ÊÕ ⁄UÁ¡S≈˛UÊ⁄U, »§ê‚¸ ∞fl¥ ‚¥SÕÊ∞¥ ∑§Ê •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚ÊÒ¥¬ÃÊ „ÒU.
v~.
üÊË ÿ‡Êfl¥Ã ∑ȧ◊Ê⁄U, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆ|), ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄,U Á¡‹Ê-⁄UÊÿª…∏U ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-
¡Ê¥¡ªË⁄U-øÊ¥¬Ê ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
wÆ.
üÊË ¡Ÿ∑§ ¬˝‚ÊŒ ¬Ê∆U∑§, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆ|), ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-¡Ê¥¡ªË⁄U-øÊ¥¬Ê ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ‚¥øÊ‹∑§,
÷Í-•Á÷‹π ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
wv.
üÊË ÷Ë◊ Á‚¥„U, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆ}), •ÊÿÈÄÃ, ¿U.ª. ªÎ„U ÁŸ◊ʸáÊ ◊¥«U‹ ÃÕÊ •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ◊ÈÅÿ ∑§Êÿ¸¬Ê‹Ÿ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U Áfl∑§Ê‚
¬˝ÊÁäÊ∑§⁄UáÊ, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-⁄UÊÿª…∏U ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
ww.
üÊË ⁄UÊ¡‡Ê Á‚¥„U ⁄UÊáÊÊ, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆ}), ‚¥ÿÈÄà ‚Áøfl, •ÊÁÕ¸∑§ ∞fl¥ ‚Ê¥ÁÅÿ∑§Ë Áfl÷ʪ ÃÕÊ ‚¥ÿÈÄà ‚Áøfl, äÊÊÁ◊¸∑§ ãÿÊ‚ ∞fl¥
äÊ◊¸Sfl Áfl÷ʪ ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ‚ŒSÿ ‚Áøfl, ⁄UÊíÿ ÿÊ¡ŸÊ •Êÿʪ ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
üÊË ⁄UÊ¡‡Ê Á‚¥„U ⁄UÊáÊÊ, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. mÊ⁄UÊ ∑§Êÿ¸÷Ê⁄U ª˝„UáÊ ∑§⁄UŸ ∑§ ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ ‚ ‚ŒSÿ ‚Áøfl, ⁄UÊíÿ ÿÊ¡ŸÊ •Êÿʪ ∑§ •‚¥flªË¸ÿ ¬Œ ∑§Ê ⁄UÊíÿ
‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ, ÷Ê⁄UÃËÿ ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚ÁŸ∑§ ‚flÊ (flß) ÁŸÿ◊Êfl‹Ë, wÆv{ ∑§ ÁŸÿ◊-vw ∑§ ÄUà ¬˝ÁÃDUÊ ∞fl¥ Á¡ê◊ŒÊ⁄UË ◊¥ ÷Ê⁄UÃËÿ ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚ÁŸ∑§ ‚flÊ ∑§ ∑§ÁŸDU
¬˝‡ÊÊ‚ÁŸ∑§ flß◊ÊŸ ∑§ ‚¥flªË¸ÿ ¬Œ ∑§ ‚◊∑§ˇÊ ÉÊÊÁ·Ã ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
[ ÷ʪ v
612
wx.
üÊË◊ÃË Á‡ÊπÊ ⁄UÊ¡¬Íà ÁÃflÊ⁄UË, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆ}), ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-ªÊÒ⁄‘U‹Ê-¬á«˛UÊ-◊⁄UflÊ„UË ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãÃ
ÁŸÿ¥òÊ∑§, ŸÊ¬-ÃÊÒ‹ ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄ÃÊ „ÒU.
üÊË◊ÃË Á‡ÊπÊ ⁄UÊ¡¬Íà ÁÃflÊ⁄UË, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. mÊ⁄UÊ ∑§Êÿ¸÷Ê⁄U ª˝„UáÊ ∑§⁄UŸ ∑§ ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ ‚ ÁŸÿ¥òÊ∑§, ŸÊ¬-ÃÊÒ‹ ∑§ •‚¥flªË¸ÿ ¬Œ ∑§Ê ⁄UÊíÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ,
÷Ê⁄UÃËÿ ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚ÁŸ∑§ ‚flÊ (flß) ÁŸÿ◊Êfl‹Ë, wÆv{ ∑§ ÁŸÿ◊-vw ∑§ ÄUà ¬˝ÁÃDUÊ ∞fl¥ Á¡ê◊ŒÊ⁄UË ◊¥ ÷Ê⁄UÃËÿ ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚ÁŸ∑§ ‚flÊ ∑§ ∑§ÁŸDU
¬˝‡ÊÊ‚ÁŸ∑§ flß◊ÊŸ ∑§ ‚¥flªË¸ÿ ¬Œ ∑§ ‚◊∑§ˇÊ ÉÊÊÁ·Ã ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
wy.
üÊË ‚àÿŸÊ⁄UÊÿáÊ ⁄UÊ∆UÊÒ⁄U, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆ}), ÁŸÿ¥òÊ∑§, πÊl ∞fl¥ •ÊÒ·ÁäÊ ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U,
Á¡‹Ê-∑§ÊÁ⁄UÿÊ ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
wz.
üÊË ◊„UÊŒfl ∑§Êfl⁄‘U, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆ}), ‚¥øÊ‹∑§, ∑§Ê·, ‹πÊ ∞fl¥ ¬¥‡ÊŸ ÃÕÊ •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚¥ÿÈÄà ‚Áøfl, πÁŸ¡ ‚ÊäÊŸ Áfl÷ʪ
∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-¡‡Ê¬È⁄U ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
w{.
üÊË ‡ÿÊ◊ ‹Ê‹ äÊÊfl«∏‘U, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆ}), ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-ªÁ⁄UÿÊ’¥Œ ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-
’‹⁄UÊ◊¬È⁄U-⁄UÊ◊ÊŸÈ¡ª¥¡ ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
w|.
üÊË ŸË‹∑¥§∆U ≈UË∑§Ê◊, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆ}), ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-∑§Êá«Uʪʥfl ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ‚¥øÊ‹∑§, ∑§Ê·,
‹πÊ ∞fl¥ ¬¥‡ÊŸ ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
w}.
«UÊÚ. Ã¥’Ê‹Ë •ƒÿÊ¡ »§∑§Ë⁄U÷Ê߸U, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆ~), ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-’SÃ⁄U ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà •ÊÿÈÄà ¿U.ª.
ªÎ„U ÁŸ◊ʸáÊ ◊¥«U‹ ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄Uà „ÈU∞ ◊ÈÅÿ ∑§Êÿ¸¬Ê‹Ÿ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U Áfl∑§Ê‚ ¬˝ÊÁäÊ∑§⁄UáÊ, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U ∑§Ê •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚ÊÒ¥¬ÃÊ „ÒU.
«UÊÚ. Ã¥’Ê‹Ë •ƒÿÊ¡ »§∑§Ë⁄U÷Ê߸U, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. mÊ⁄UÊ ∑§Êÿ¸÷Ê⁄U ª˝„UáÊ ∑§⁄UŸ ∑§ ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ ‚ ∑§ •ÊÿÈÄÃ, ¿U.ª. ªÎ„U ÁŸ◊ʸáÊ ◊¥«U‹ •‚¥flªË¸ÿ ¬Œ
∑§Ê ⁄UÊíÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ, ÷Ê⁄UÃËÿ ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚ÁŸ∑§ ‚flÊ (flß) ÁŸÿ◊Êfl‹Ë, wÆv{ ∑§ ÁŸÿ◊-vw ∑§ ÄUà ¬˝ÁÃDUÊ ∞fl¥ Á¡ê◊ŒÊ⁄UË ◊¥ ÷Ê⁄UÃËÿ ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚ÁŸ∑§ ‚flÊ
∑§ ∑§ÁŸDU ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚ÁŸ∑§ flß◊ÊŸ ∑§ ‚¥flªË¸ÿ ¬Œ ∑§ ‚◊∑§ˇÊ ÉÊÊÁ·Ã ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
w~.
üÊË •flŸË‡Ê ∑ȧ◊Ê⁄U ‡Ê⁄UáÊ, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆ~), ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-∑§’Ë⁄UäÊÊ◊ ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ‚¥øÊ‹∑§,
Ã∑§ŸË∑§Ë Á‡ÊˇÊÊ, ⁄UÊ¡ªÊ⁄U ∞fl¥ ¬˝Á‡ÊˇÊáÊ ∑§ ¬Œ ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
üÊË •flŸË‡Ê ∑ȧ◊Ê⁄U ‡Ê⁄UáÊ, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. mÊ⁄UÊ ∑§Êÿ¸÷Ê⁄U ª˝„UáÊ ∑§⁄UŸ ∑§ ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ ‚ ‚¥øÊ‹∑§, Ã∑§ŸË∑§Ë Á‡ÊˇÊÊ, ⁄UÊ¡ªÊ⁄U ∞fl¥ ¬˝Á‡ÊˇÊáÊ ∑§
•‚¥flªË¸ÿ ¬Œ ∑§Ê ⁄UÊíÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ, ÷Ê⁄UÃËÿ ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚ÁŸ∑§ ‚flÊ (flß) ÁŸÿ◊Êfl‹Ë, wÆv{ ∑§ ÁŸÿ◊-vw ∑§ ÄUà ¬˝ÁÃDUÊ ∞fl¥ Á¡ê◊ŒÊ⁄UË ◊¥ ÷Ê⁄UÃËÿ
¬˝‡ÊÊ‚ÁŸ∑§ ‚flÊ ∑§ ∑§ÁŸDU ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚ÁŸ∑§ flß◊ÊŸ ∑§ ‚¥flªË¸ÿ ¬Œ ∑§ ‚◊∑§ˇÊ ÉÊÊÁ·Ã ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
xÆ.
üÊË ‚ÈŸË‹ ∑ȧ◊Ê⁄U ¡ÒŸ, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆ~), ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-◊„UÊ‚◊È¥Œ ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-
’‹ÊҌʒʡÊ⁄U-÷Ê≈UʬÊ⁄UÊ ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
xv.
üÊË «UÊ◊Ÿ Á‚¥„U, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆ~), ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-∑§ÊÁ⁄UÿÊ ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U Á¡‹Ê-ªÊÒ⁄‘U‹Ê-
¬¥«˛UÊ-◊⁄UflÊ„UË ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
xw.
üÊË ∑§. «UË. ∑È¥§¡Ê◊, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆ~), ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-’ˡʬÈ⁄U ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ‚¥ÿÈÄà ‚Áøfl, ‚Ê◊Êãÿ
¬˝‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ Áfl÷ʪ ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄Uà „ÈU∞ ‚¥ÿÈÄà ‚Áøfl, ⁄UÊ¡Sfl ∞fl¥ •Ê¬ŒÊ ¬˝’¥äÊŸ Áfl÷ʪ ∑§Ê •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚ÊÒ¥¬ÃÊ „ÒU.
xx.
üÊË ¡ÿ ¬˝∑§Ê‡Ê ◊ÊÒÿ¸, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆvÆ), ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-⁄UÊ¡ŸÊ¥ŒªÊ¥fl ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-
äÊ◊Ã⁄UË ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
xy.
üÊË ∑§ÊÁø∑§ÿ ªÊÿ‹, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆvÆ), ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-’‹ÊҌʒʡÊ⁄U-÷Ê≈UʬÊ⁄UÊ ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãÃ
∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-◊„UÊ‚◊È¥Œ ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
xz.
üÊË◊ÃË ⁄UÊŸÍ ‚Ê„ÍU, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆvÆ), ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-’Ê‹ÊŒ ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà •ÊÿÈÄÃ, flÊÁáÊÁíÿ∑§ ∑§⁄U
∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
÷ʪ v ]
613
x{.
üÊË ‚Ê⁄UÊ¥‡Ê Á◊ûÊ⁄U, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆvÆ), ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-‚⁄UªÈ¡Ê ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-
Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
x|.
üÊË ¬ŒÈ◊ Á‚¥„U ∞À◊Ê, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆvÆ), ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-ŸÊ⁄UÊÿáʬÈ⁄U ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-
◊È¥ª‹Ë ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
x}.
üÊË ⁄U◊‡Ê ∑ȧ◊Ê⁄U ‡Ê◊ʸ, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆvÆ), ‚¥ÿÈÄà ‚Áøfl, ◊ÈÅÿ ‚Áøfl, ∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ ÃÕÊ •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚¥øÊ‹∑§, ÷Í-•Á÷‹π ∞fl¥
•ÊÿÈÄÃ, flÊÁáÊÁíÿ∑§ ∑§⁄U ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-∑§’Ë⁄UäÊÊ◊ ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
x~.
üÊË ŸË‹‡Ê∑ȧ◊Ê⁄U ◊„UÊŒfl ˇÊË⁄U‚ʪ⁄U, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆvv), ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-¡‡Ê¬È⁄U ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ÁŸÿ¥òÊ∑§,
πÊl ∞fl¥ •ÊÒ·ÁäÊ ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄Uà „ÈU∞ ◊ÈÅÿ ∑§Êÿ¸¬Ê‹Ÿ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ⁄UÊíÿ ∑§Ê҇ʋ Áfl∑§Ê‚ •Á÷∑§⁄UáÊ, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U ∑§Ê •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U
‚ÊÒ¥¬ÃÊ „ÒU.
üÊË ŸË‹‡Ê ∑ȧ◊Ê⁄U ◊„UÊŒfl ˇÊË⁄U‚ʪ⁄U, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. mÊ⁄UÊ ∑§Êÿ¸÷Ê⁄U ª˝„UáÊ ∑§⁄UŸ ∑§ ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ ‚ ÁŸÿ¥òÊ∑§, πÊl ∞fl¥ •ÊÒ·ÁäÊ ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∑§
•‚¥flªË¸ÿ ¬Œ ∑§Ê ⁄UÊíÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ, ÷Ê⁄UÃËÿ ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚ÁŸ∑§ ‚flÊ (flß) ÁŸÿ◊Êfl‹Ë, wÆv{ ∑§ ÁŸÿ◊-vw ∑§ ÄUà ¬˝ÁÃDUÊ ∞fl¥ Á¡ê◊ŒÊ⁄UË ◊¥ ÷Ê⁄UÃËÿ
¬˝‡ÊÊ‚ÁŸ∑§ ‚flÊ ∑§ ∑§ÁŸDU ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚ÁŸ∑§ flß◊ÊŸ ∑§ ‚¥flªË¸ÿ ¬Œ ∑§ ‚◊∑§ˇÊ ÉÊÊÁ·Ã ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
yÆ.
üÊË ÷Í⁄‘U ‚fl¸‡fl⁄U Ÿ⁄‘Uãº˝, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆvv), ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-◊È¥ª‹Ë ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-ŒÈª¸
∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
yv.
üÊË ŒË¬∑§ ‚ÊŸË, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆvv), ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-‚Í⁄U¡¬È⁄U ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-Œ¥ÃflÊ«∏Ê
∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
yw.
üÊË ‚¥¡Ëfl ∑ȧ◊Ê⁄U ¤ÊÊ, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆvv), ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-’‹⁄UÊ◊¬È⁄U-⁄UÊ◊ÊŸÈ¡ª¥¡ ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãÃ
∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-‚⁄UªÈ¡Ê ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
yx.
üÊË ¡ã◊¡ÿ ◊„UÊ’, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆvv), •ÊÿÈÄÃ-‚„U-‚¥øÊ‹∑§, ◊Á„U‹Ê ∞fl¥ ’Ê‹ Áfl∑§Ê‚ ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãÃ
∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-’Ê‹ÊŒ ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
yy.
üÊË ⁄U¡Ã ’¥‚‹, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆvw), ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-äÊ◊Ã⁄UË ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-’SÃ⁄U ∑§
¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
yz.
üÊË Á⁄UÃ‡Ê ∑ȧ◊Ê⁄U •ª˝flÊ‹, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆvw), ◊ÈÅÿ ∑§Êÿ¸¬Ê‹Ÿ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, Á¡‹Ê ¬¥øÊÿÃ, Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë
•ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-’ˡʬÈ⁄U ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
y{.
üÊË •Á÷¡Ëà Á‚¥„U, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆvw), Á◊‡ÊŸ ‚¥øÊ‹∑§, ⁄UÊíÿ ª˝Ê◊ËáÊ •Ê¡ËÁfl∑§Ê Á◊‡ÊŸ ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãÃ
∑§‹Ä≈⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-ŸÊ⁄UÊÿáʬÈ⁄U ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
y|.
üÊË ⁄UáÊ’Ë⁄U ‡Ê◊ʸ, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆvw), ⁄UÁ¡S≈˛UÊ⁄U, »§ê‚¸ ∞fl¥ ‚¥SÕÊ∞¥ ÃÕÊ •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ©U¬ ‚Áøfl, ◊Á„U‹Ê ∞fl¥ ’Ê‹ Áfl∑§Ê‚ Áfl÷ʪ
∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-‚Í⁄U¡¬È⁄U ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
y}.
üÊË ¬Èc¬ãº˝ ∑ȧ◊Ê⁄U ◊ËáÊÊ, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆvw), ‚¥øÊ‹∑§, Ã∑§ŸË∑§Ë Á‡ÊˇÊÊ, ⁄UÊ¡ªÊ⁄U ∞fl¥ ¬˝Á‡ÊˇÊáÊ ÃÕÊ ◊ÈÅÿ ∑§Êÿ¸¬Ê‹Ÿ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ⁄UÊíÿ
∑§Ê҇ʋ Áfl∑§Ê‚ •Á÷∑§⁄UáÊ ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-∑§Êá«Uʪʥfl ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
y~.
üÊË◊ÃË ÁŒ√ÿÊ ©U◊‡Ê Á◊üÊÊ, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆvw), ©U¬ ‚Áøfl, ‹Ê∑§ SflÊSâÿ ÿÊ¥ÁòÊ∑§Ë Áfl÷ʪ ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãÃ
‚¥øÊ‹∑§, ◊Á„U‹Ê ∞fl¥ ’Ê‹ Áfl∑§Ê‚ ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
zÆ.
üÊË ¡ªŒË‡Ê ‚ÊŸ∑§⁄U, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆvx), •¬⁄U ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-◊„UÊ‚◊È¥Œ ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ◊ÈÅÿ
∑§Êÿ¸¬Ê‹Ÿ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ¿U.ª. S≈U≈U flÊ≈U⁄U‡Ê«U ◊ÒŸ¡◊¥≈U ∞¡¥‚Ë, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
[ ÷ʪ v
614
üÊË ¡ªŒË‡Ê ‚ÊŸ∑§⁄U, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. mÊ⁄UÊ ∑§Êÿ¸÷Ê⁄U ª˝„UáÊ ∑§⁄UŸ ∑§ ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ ‚ ◊ÈÅÿ ∑§Êÿ¸¬Ê‹Ÿ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ¿U.ª. S≈U≈U flÊ≈U⁄U‡Ê«U ◊ÒŸ¡◊¥≈U
∞¡¥‚Ë, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U ∑§ •‚¥flªË¸ÿ ¬Œ ∑§Ê ⁄UÊíÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ, ÷Ê⁄UÃËÿ ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚ÁŸ∑§ ‚flÊ (flß) ÁŸÿ◊Êfl‹Ë, wÆv{ ∑§ ÁŸÿ◊-vw ∑§ ÄUà ¬˝ÁÃDUÊ ∞fl¥
Á¡ê◊ŒÊ⁄UË ◊¥ ÷Ê⁄UÃËÿ ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚ÁŸ∑§ ‚flÊ ∑§ flÁ⁄UDU flß◊ÊŸ ∑§ ‚¥flªË¸ÿ ¬Œ ∑§ ‚◊∑§ˇÊ ÉÊÊÁ·Ã ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
zv.
üÊË ∑È¥§ŒŸ ∑ȧ◊Ê⁄U, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆvy), ◊ÈÅÿ ∑§Êÿ¸¬Ê‹Ÿ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, Á¡‹Ê ¬¥øÊÿÃ, ŒÈª¸ ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãÃ
◊ÈÅÿ ∑§Êÿ¸¬Ê‹Ÿ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, Á¡‹Ê ¬¥øÊÿÃ, ∑§Ê⁄U’Ê ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
zw.
üÊË ∞‚. ¡ÿfläʸŸ, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆvy), ◊ÈÅÿ ∑§Êÿ¸¬Ê‹Ÿ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, Á¡‹Ê ¬¥øÊÿà ∑§Ê⁄U’Ê ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãÃ
•ÊÿÈÄÃ, Ÿª⁄U ¬ÊÁ‹∑§ ÁŸª◊, ∑§Ê⁄U’Ê ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
zx.
üÊË «UË. ⁄UÊ„ÈU‹ fl¥∑§≈U, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆvz), ©U¬ ‚Áøfl, ÿÊ¡ŸÊ, •ÊÁÕ¸∑§ ∞fl¥ ‚Ê¥ÁÅÿ∑§Ë ÃÕÊ •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ¬ŒŸ ©U¬ ‚Áøfl, ¿U.ª.
⁄UÊíÿ ÿÊ¡ŸÊ •Êÿʪ ∞fl¥ ©U¬ ‚Áøfl, ¬ÿ¸≈UŸ ∞fl¥ ‚¥S∑ΧÁà ÃÕÊ Áfl‡Ê· ∑§Ã¸√ÿSÕ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, SflÊSâÿ Áfl÷ʪ ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê
¬ÿ¸ãà ©U¬ ‚Áøfl, πÁŸ¡ ‚ÊäÊŸ Áfl÷ʪ ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄Uà „ÈU∞ Á◊‡ÊŸ ‚¥øÊ‹∑§, ⁄UÊíÿ ª˝Ê◊ËáÊ •Ê¡ËÁfl∑§Ê Á◊‡ÊŸ ∞fl¥ Áfl‡Ê· ∑§Ã¸√ÿSÕ
•ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, SflÊSâÿ ∞fl¥ ¬Á⁄UflÊ⁄U ∑§ÀÿÊáÊ Áfl÷ʪ ∑§Ê •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚ÊÒ¥¬ÃÊ „ÒU.
zy.
üÊË ⁄UÊ„ÈU‹ Œfl, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆv{), •ÊÿÈÄÃ, Ÿª⁄U ¬ÊÁ‹∑§ ÁŸª◊, ∑§Ê⁄U’Ê ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ◊ÈÅÿ ∑§Êÿ¸¬Ê‹Ÿ
•ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, Á¡‹Ê ¬¥øÊÿÃ, ŸÊ⁄UÊÿáʬÈ⁄U ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
zz.
üÊË •Ê∑§Ê‡Ê Á¿U∑§Ê⁄UÊ, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆv|), ‚„UÊÿ∑§ ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, ‚⁄UªÈ¡Ê, •¥Á’∑§Ê¬È⁄U ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ◊ÈÅÿ
∑§Êÿ¸¬Ê‹Ÿ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, Á¡‹Ê ¬¥øÊÿÃ, ‚Í⁄U¡¬È⁄U ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ∑§ ⁄UÊíÿ¬Ê‹ ∑§ ŸÊ◊ ‚ ÃÕÊ •ÊŒ‡ÊÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U,
∑§◊‹¬˝Ëà Á‚¥„U, ‚Áøfl.
üÊ◊ Áfl÷ʪ
◊¢òÊÊ‹ÿ, ◊„UÊŸŒËU ÷flŸ, ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄
ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡ÍŸ wÆwÆ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ ∞»§ vÆ-Æv/wÆv~/v{.ó¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U •ÊÒlÊÁª∑§ ‚¥’¥äÊ •ÁäÊÁŸÿ◊ v~{Æ ∑§Ë äÊÊ⁄UÊ y ∑§Ë ©U¬äÊÊ⁄UÊ (v) mÊ⁄UÊ ¬˝ŒûÊ ‡ÊÁÄÃÿÊ¥ ∑§Ê
¬˝ÿʪ ◊¥ ‹Êà „ÈU∞ ßU‚ ‚¥’¥äÊ ◊¥ ¬Ífl¸ ◊¥ ¬˝‚ÊÁ⁄Uà ‚◊Sà •ÁäÊ‚ÍøŸÊ•Ê¥ ∑§Ê ÁŸc¬˝÷ÊflË ∑§⁄Uà „ÈU∞ ⁄UÊíÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∞ÃŒ˜mÊ⁄UÊ üÊË ∞‹Ä‚ √„UË.∞»§. ¬ÊÚ‹
◊ŸŸ √„UË. (÷Ê.¬˝.‚.) üÊ◊ÊÿÈÄà ∑§Ê ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊíÿ ∑§ Á‹∞ “◊ÈÅÿ ‚È‹„U∑§Ê⁄U” ÁŸÿÈÄà ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
No. F 10-01/2019/16.—In exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 of Chhattisgarh
Industrial Relation Act, 1960 and in supersession of all previous notification issued on the Subject, State Govern-
ment hereby appoints Shri Alex V. F. Paul Menon V. (IAS) Labour Commissioner to be “Chief Conciliator” for the
State of Chhattisgarh.
ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡ÍŸ wÆwÆ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ ∞»§ vÆ-Æv/wÆv~/v{.ó¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U •ÊÒlÊÁª∑§ ‚¥’¥äÊ •ÁäÊÁŸÿ◊ v~{Æ (‚Ÿ˜ v~{Æ ∑§Ê ∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ w|) ∑§Ë äÊÊ⁄UÊ x ∑§Ë ©U¬äÊÊ⁄UÊ
(v) mÊ⁄UÊ ¬˝ŒûÊ ‡ÊÁÄÃÿÊ¥ ∑§Ê ¬˝ÿʪ ◊¥ ‹Êà „ÈU∞ ßU‚ ‚¥’¥äÊ ◊¥ ¬Ífl¸ ◊¥ ¬˝‚ÊÁ⁄ç ‚◊Sà •ÁäÊ‚ÍøŸÊ•Ê¥ ∑§Ê ÁŸc¬˝÷ÊflË ∑§⁄Uà „ÈU∞ ⁄UÊíÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∞ÃŒ˜mÊ⁄UÊ
üÊË ∞‹Ä‚ √„UË.∞»§. ¬ÊÚ‹ ◊ŸŸ √„UË. (÷Ê.¬˝.‚.) ∑§Ê ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊíÿ ∑§ Á‹∞ “üÊ◊ •ÊÿÈÄÔ ÁŸÿÈÄà ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
No. F 10-01/2019/16.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of Chhattisgarh
Industrial Relation Act, 1960 (27 of 1960) and in supersession of all previous notification issued in this regard, the
State Government hereby appoints Shri Alex V. F. Paul Menon V. (IAS) as the “Labour Commissioner” for the State
of Chhattisgarh.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
÷ʪ v ]
615
ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡ÍŸ wÆwÆ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ ∞»§ vÆ-Æw/wÆv|/v{.ó•ÊÒlÊÁª∑§ ÁflflÊŒ •ÁäÊÁŸÿ◊ v~y| (∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§-XIV v~y|) ∑§Ë äÊÊ⁄UÊ x~ mÊ⁄UÊ ¬˝ŒûÊ ‡ÊÁÄÃÿÊ¥ ∑§Ê
¬˝ÿʪ ◊¥ ‹Êà „ÈU∞ ∞fl¥ ßU‚ Áfl·ÿ∑§ ¬Ífl¸ ◊¥ ¡Ê⁄UË ‚◊Sà •ÁäÊ‚ÍøŸÊ•Ê¥ ∑§Ê ÁŸc¬˝÷ÊflË ∑§⁄Uà „ÈU∞, ⁄UÊíÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∞ÃŒ˜mÊ⁄UÊ ÿ„U ÁŸŒ¸‡Ê ŒÃÊ „ÒU Á∑§,
©UÄà •ÁäÊÁŸÿ◊ ∑§Ë äÊÊ⁄UÊ-xy ∑§ •äÊËŸ ©U‚∑§ mÊ⁄UÊ ¬˝ÿÊíÿ ‡ÊÁÄà üÊË ∞‹Ä‚ √„UË.∞»§. ¬ÊÚ‹ ◊ŸŸ √„UË. (÷Ê.¬˝.‚.) üÊ◊ÊÿÈÄà ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U, ŸflÊ
⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U mÊ⁄UÊ ‚¥¬Íáʸ ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ∑§ Á‹∞ ¬˝ÿʪ ◊¥ ‹ÊÿË ¡ÊflªË.
No. F 10-02/2019/16.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 39 of the Industrial Dispute Act,
1947 (No. XIV of 1947) and in supersession of all previous notification on the subject, the State Government hereby
directs that powers under Section 34 of the said Act shall be exercised by Shri Alex V.F. Paul Menon V. (IAS) Labour
Commissioner, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar for the State of whole Chhattisgarh.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ∑§ ⁄UÊíÿ¬Ê‹ ∑§ ŸÊ◊ ‚ ÃÕÊ •ÊŒ‡ÊÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U,
⁄‘UáÊÈ∑§Ê üÊËflÊSÃfl, ©U¬ ‚Áøfl.
flÊÁáÊíÿ ∞fl¥ ©Ulʪ Áfl÷ʪ
◊¢òÊÊ‹ÿ, ◊„UÊŸŒËU ÷flŸ, ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄
ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ vz ¡ÍŸ wÆwÆ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ •Ê⁄U. wv~w/zÆy}/wÆv|/vv/({).ó⁄UÊíÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∞ÃŒ˜mÊ⁄UÊ ⁄UÊíÿ ◊¥ ÁSÕà ©Ulʪʥ ‚ ©Uà¬ãŸ „UÊŸ flÊ‹ ¬Á⁄U‚¥∑§≈U◊ÿ •¬Á‡ÊCU
∑§Ê ÁŸÿ◊ÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U •¬fl„UŸ (Á«US¬Ê¡‹) Á∑§ÿ ¡ÊŸ „UÃÈ ª˝Ê◊-∑§‚ŒÊ, ⁄UÊ.ÁŸ.◊¥. ÄU‚Ë‹-Á‚◊ªÊ, Á¡‹Ê-’‹ÊҌʒʡÊ⁄U-÷Ê≈UʬÊ⁄UÊ ∑§Ë zÆ ∞∑§«∏
÷ÍÁ◊ (π‚⁄UÊ ∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ vÆÆy ‚ vÆww Ã∑§ ∞fl¥ π‚⁄UÊ ∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ vÆw|, vÆw} ∑ȧ‹ ⁄U∑§’Ê wÆ.yvÆ „UÄ≈Uÿ⁄U •ÕʸØ zÆ.yx ∞∑§«∏) ∑§Ê ¬Á⁄U‚¥∑§≈U◊ÿ
•¬Á‡ÊCU ∑§ •¬fl„UŸ ∑§ Á‹∞ ∑§ÊÚ◊Ÿ ≈˛UË≈U◊¥≈U, S≈UÊ⁄‘¡ ∞¥«U Á«US¬Ê¡‹ »Ò§Á‚Á‹≈UË (CTSDF) ∑§Ë SÕʬŸÊ „UÃÈ •ÁäÊ‚ÍÁøà ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
ßU‚ •ÁäÊ‚ÍøŸÊ ¡Ê⁄UË „UÊŸ ∑§Ë ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ ‚ ¬˝flÎûÊ „ÈU߸U ‚◊¤ÊË ¡Ê∞ªË.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ∑§ ⁄UÊíÿ¬Ê‹ ∑§ ŸÊ◊ ‚ ÃÕÊ •ÊŒ‡ÊÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U,
◊ŸÊ¡ ∑ȧ◊Ê⁄U Á¬¥ªÈ•Ê, ¬˝◊Èπ ‚Áøfl.
ªÎ„U (¬ÈÁ‹‚) Áfl÷ʪ
◊¢òÊÊ‹ÿ, ◊„UÊŸŒËU ÷flŸ, ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄
ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ vÆ ¡ÍŸ wÆwÆ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ ∞»§ v-Æ{/wÆv~/ŒÊ-ªÎ„U/÷ʬȂ.ó⁄UÊíÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ mÊ⁄UÊ üÊË ◊ÿ¥∑§ üÊËflÊSÃfl, (÷ʬȂ-wÆÆ{), ‚„UÊÿ∑§ ¬ÈÁ‹‚ ◊„UÊÁŸ⁄UˡÊ∑§,
Ã∑§ŸË∑§Ë ‚flÊ∞¥/ÿÊÃÊÿÊÃ, ¬ÈÁ‹‚ ◊ÈÅÿÊ‹ÿ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U ∑§Ê •SÕÊÿË M§¬ ‚ •ÊªÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ÁŸŒ‡Ê∑§, ≈˛UÁŸ¥ª •Ê¬⁄‘U‡ÊŸ, •ÁÇŸ‡Ê◊Ÿ ∞fl¥
•Ê¬ÊÃ∑§Ê‹ËŸ ‚flÊ∞¥, Ÿª⁄U ‚ŸÊ ∞fl¥ ŸÊªÁ⁄U∑§ ‚È⁄UˇÊÊ ◊ÈÅÿÊ‹ÿ, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ Á∑§ÿÊ ¡ÊÃÊ „ÒU.
w.
üÊË ◊ÿ¥∑§ üÊËflÊSÃfl, mÊ⁄UÊ ∑§Êÿ¸÷Ê⁄U ª˝„UáÊ ∑§⁄UŸ ∑§ ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ ‚ ⁄UÊíÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ, ÷Ê⁄UÃËÿ ¬ÈÁ‹‚ ‚flÊ (flß) ÁŸÿ◊ wÆv{ ∑§ ÁŸÿ◊-vw
∑§ ÄUà ÁŸŒ‡Ê∑§, ≈˛UÁŸ¥ª •Ê¬⁄‘U‡ÊŸ, •ÁÇŸ‡Ê◊Ÿ ∞fl¥ •Ê¬ÊÃ∑§Ê‹ËŸ ‚flÊ∞¥, Ÿª⁄U ‚ŸÊ ∞fl¥ ŸÊªÁ⁄U∑§ ‚È⁄UˇÊÊ ◊ÈÅÿÊ‹ÿ, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U ∑§ •‚¥flªË¸ÿ ¬Œ
∑§Ê ¬˝ÁÃDUÊ ∞fl¥ Á¡ê◊ŒÊ⁄UË ◊¥ ÷Ê⁄UÃËÿ ¬ÈÁ‹‚ ‚flÊ ∑§ flÁ⁄UDU flß◊ÊŸ ∑§ ‚◊∑§ˇÊ ÉÊÊÁ·Ã Á∑§ÿÊ ¡ÊÃÊ „ÒU.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ∑§ ⁄UÊíÿ¬Ê‹ ∑§ ŸÊ◊ ‚ ÃÕÊ •ÊŒ‡ÊÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U,
«UË. ¬Ë. ∑§Ê҇ʋ, •fl⁄U ‚Áøfl.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
[ ÷ʪ v
616
∑ΧÁ· Áfl∑§Ê‚ ∞fl¥ Á∑§‚ÊŸ ∑§ÀÿÊáÊ ÃÕÊ ¡Òfl ¬˝ÊÒlÊÁª∑§Ë Áfl÷ʪ
◊¢òÊÊ‹ÿ, ◊„UÊŸŒËU ÷flŸ, ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄
ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡ÍŸ wÆwÆ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§/yv}w/∞»§-Æw/Æw/WBCIS/wÆwÆ/vy-w.ó©UlÊÁŸ∑§Ë »§‚‹Ê¥ ◊¥ ¬ÈŸª¸Á∆Uà ◊ÊÒ‚◊ •ÊäÊÊÁ⁄Uà »§‚‹ ’Ë◊Ê ÿÊ¡ŸÊ ∑§ Á∑˝§ÿÊãflÿŸ
„UÃÈ Áfl÷ʪËÿ •ÁäÊ‚ÍøŸÊ ∑˝§. yÆy~/∞»§-Æw/Æw/WBCIS/wÆwÆ/vy-w ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ ww-Æ{-wÆwÆ ¡Ê⁄ËU Á∑§ÿÊ ªÿÊ „ÒU. ©UÄà •ÁäÊ‚ÍøŸÊ ◊¥
∞ÃŒ˜mÊ⁄UÊ ÁŸêŸÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U ‚¥‡ÊÊäÊŸ Á∑§ÿÊ ¡ÊÃÊ „ÒU —ó
©UÄà •ÁäÊ‚ÍøŸÊ ∑§ Á’ãŒÈ ∑˝§. x (π) •´§áÊË ∑Χ·∑§ ◊¥ ©UÀ‹Áπà “ßU‚ „UÃÈ ∑Χ·∑§ ∑§Ê »§‚‹ ’È•Ê߸U ¬˝◊ÊáÊ ¬òÊ ÿÊ ’È•Ê߸U ∑§ •Ê‡Êÿ
∑§Ê SflÉÊÊ·áÊÊ ¬òÊ ¡Ê ˇÊòÊËÿ ⁄UÊ¡Sfl •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË/ª˝Ê◊ËáÊ ©UlÊŸ ÁflSÃÊ⁄U •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË mÊ⁄UÊ ‚àÿÊÁ¬Ã „UÊ ‚Á„Uà ‚¥’¥ÁäÊà •ãÿ •Êfl‡ÿ∑§ ŒSÃÊfl¡
¬˝SÃÈà ∑§⁄UŸÊ „Uʪʔ ∑§ SÕÊŸ ¬⁄U “ßU‚ „UÃÈ ∑Χ·∑§ ∑§Ê ÉÊÊ·áÊÊ ¬òÊ ∑§ ‚ÊÕ »§‚‹ ’È•Ê߸U ¬˝◊ÊáÊ-¬òÊ •ÕflÊ ¬˝SÃÊÁflà »§‚‹ ’ÊŸ ∑§ •Ê‡Êÿ ∑§Ê
SflÉÊÊ·áÊÊ ¬òÊ ‚Á„Uà ‚¥’¥ÁäÊà •ãÿ •Êfl‡ÿ∑§ ŒSÃÊfl¡ ¬˝SÃÈà ∑§⁄UŸÊ „Uʪʔ ¬…∏UÊ ¡Êfl.
‡Ê· ¬˝flÃ˸ ‡ÊÃZ •ÁäÊ‚ÍøŸÊ ∑˝§. yÆy~ ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ ww-Æ{-wÆwÆ ∑§ •ŸÈM§¬ „UʪË.
ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡ÍŸ wÆwÆ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§/yv}y/∞»§-Æw/Æv/PMFBY/wÆwÆ/vy-w.ó¬˝äÊÊŸ◊¥òÊË »§‚‹ ’Ë◊Ê ÿÊ¡ŸÊ ∑§ Á∑˝§ÿÊãflÿŸ „UÃÈ Áfl÷ʪËÿ •ÁäÊ‚ÍøŸÊ ∑˝§.
w~|{/∞»§-Æw/Æv/PMFBY/wÆwÆ/vy-w ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ v{-Æ{-wÆwÆ ¡Ê⁄UËU Á∑§ÿÊ ªÿÊ „ÒU. ©UÄà •ÁäÊ‚ÍøŸÊ ◊¥ ∞ÃŒ˜mÊ⁄UÊ ÁŸêŸÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U ‚¥‡ÊÊäÊŸ Á∑§ÿÊ
¡ÊÃÊ „ÒU —ó
•ÁäÊ‚ÍøŸÊ ∑§ Á’ãŒÈ ∑˝§. x (π) •´§áÊË ∑Χ·∑§ ◊¥ ©UÀ‹Áπà “ßU‚ „UÃÈ ∑Χ·∑§ ∑§Ê ÉÊÊ·áÊÊ ¬òÊ ∑§ ‚ÊÕ »§‚‹ ’È•Ê߸U ∑§Ë ¬ÈÁCU ∑§Ê
¬˝◊ÊáÊ-¬òÊ ¡Ê ˇÊòÊËÿ ª˝Ê.∑Χ.Áfl. •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË mÊ⁄UÊ ‚àÿÊÁ¬Ã „UÊ ‚Á„Uà ‚¥’¥ÁäÊà •ãÿ •Êfl‡ÿ∑§ ŒSÃÊfl¡ ¬˝SÃÈà ∑§⁄UŸÊ „Uʪʔ ∑§ SÕÊŸ ¬⁄U “ßU‚
„UÃÈ ∑Χ·∑§ ∑§Ê ÉÊÊ·áÊÊ ¬òÊ ∑§ ‚ÊÕ »§‚‹ ’È•Ê߸U ¬˝◊ÊáÊ-¬òÊ •ÕflÊ ¬˝SÃÊÁflà »§‚‹ ’ÊŸ ∑§ •Ê‡Êÿ ∑§Ê SflÉÊÊ·áÊÊ ¬òÊ ‚Á„Uà ‚¥’¥ÁäÊà •ãÿ
•Êfl‡ÿ∑§ ŒSÃÊfl¡ ¬˝SÃÈà ∑§⁄UŸÊ „Uʪʔ ¬…∏UÊ ¡Êfl.
‡Ê· ¬˝flÃ˸ ‡ÊÃZ •ÁäÊ‚ÍøŸÊ ∑˝§. w~|{ ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ v{-Æ{-wÆwÆ ∑§ •ŸÈM§¬ „UʪË.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ∑§ ⁄UÊíÿ¬Ê‹ ∑§ ŸÊ◊ ‚ ÃÕÊ •ÊŒ‡ÊÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U,
∑§. ‚Ë. ¬Ò∑§⁄UÊ, ‚¥ÿÈÄà ‚Áøfl.
¡Ÿ‚¥¬∑¸§ Áfl÷ʪ
◊¢òÊÊ‹ÿ, ◊„UÊŸŒËU ÷flŸ, ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄
ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ ∞»§ Æv-Æv/wÆv~/øÊÒ’Ë‚.óÁfl÷ʪËÿ ‚◊‚¥Åÿ∑§ •ÁäÊ‚ÍøŸÊ ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ v~-Æ}-wÆv~ mÊ⁄UÊ ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ‚◊ÊøÊ⁄U ◊ËÁ«UÿÊ
¬˝ÁÃÁŸÁäÊ •ÁäÊ◊ÊãÿÃÊ ÁŸÿ◊ wÆv~ ∑§ ÁŸÿ◊ z •ŸÈ‚Ê⁄U ⁄UÊíÿ SÃ⁄UËÿ ∞fl¥ ‚¥÷ʪ SÃ⁄UËÿ •ÁäÊ◊ÊãÿÃÊ ‚Á◊Áà ∑§Ê ª∆UŸ Á∑§ÿÊ ªÿÊ „ÒU. ⁄UÊíÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ
∞ÃŒ˜mÊ⁄UÊ ©UÄà ⁄UÊíÿ SÃ⁄UËÿ ‚Á◊Áà ◊¥ ÁŸêŸÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U ‚¥‡ÊÊäÊŸ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU —ó
“⁄UÊíÿ SÃ⁄UËÿ •ÁäÊ◊ÊãÿÃÊ ‚Á◊Áà ∑§ ‚⁄U‹ ∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ y. üÊË •Ê‹Ê∑§ Á◊üÊÊ, ‚¥¬ÊŒ∑§, Ÿß¸U ŒÈÁŸÿÊ, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U ∑§ SÕÊŸ ¬⁄U üÊË ◊ŸÊ¡ ∑ȧ◊Ê⁄U
¤ÊÊ, ⁄UÊíÿ ‚¥¬ÊŒ∑§, Ÿß¸U ŒÈÁŸÿÊ, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U ∑§Ê ◊ŸÊÁŸÃ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.”
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ∑§ ⁄UÊíÿ¬Ê‹ ∑§ ŸÊ◊ ‚ ÃÕÊ •ÊŒ‡ÊÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U,
©U◊‡Ê ∑ȧ◊Ê⁄U Á◊üÊÊ, ‚¥ÿÈÄà ‚Áøfl.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
÷ʪ v ]
617
•ÊflÊ‚ ∞fl¥ ¬ÿʸfl⁄UáÊ Áfl÷ʪ
◊¢òÊÊ‹ÿ, ◊„UÊŸŒËU ÷flŸ, ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄
ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ ww ◊߸U wÆwÆ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§-∞»§ |-wÆ/wÆv~/xw.ó¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U Ÿª⁄U ÃÕÊ ª˝Ê◊ ÁŸfl‡Ê •ÁäÊÁŸÿ◊, v~|x (∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ wx ‚Ÿ˜ v~|x) ∑§Ë äÊÊ⁄UÊ vx ∑§Ë ©U¬
äÊÊ⁄UÊ (v) ∑§ •¥Ãª¸Ã ⁄UÊíÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∞ÃŒ˜mÊ⁄UÊ ßU‚ •ÁäÊÁŸÿ◊ ∑§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ ∑§ Á‹∞ Á’⁄U∑§ÊŸÊ ÁŸfl‡Ê ˇÊòÊ, Á¡‹Ê ∑§fläÊʸ ∑§Ê ª∆UŸ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU, Á¡‚∑§Ë
‚Ë◊Ê∞¥ ŸËø ŒË ªß¸U •ŸÈ‚ÍøË ◊¥ ¬Á⁄UÁŸÁ‡øØ ∑§Ë ªß¸U „ÒU —ó
•ŸÈ‚ÍøË
Á’⁄U∑§ÊŸÊ ÁŸfl‡Ê ˇÊòÊ ∑§Ë ‚Ë◊Ê∞¥
©UûÊ⁄U ◊¥ —
ª˝Ê◊ ÉÊÈÉÊ⁄UË∑§‹Ê, ¬Ê‹ËªÈ«∏Ê ∞fl¥ Á’⁄U∑§ÊŸÊ ª˝Ê◊Ê¥ ∑§Ë ©UûÊ⁄UË ‚Ë◊Ê Ã∑§.
¬Ífl¸ ◊¥
—
ª˝Ê◊ Á’⁄U∑§ÊŸÊ, πÒ⁄UÁ¤Ê≈UË, ŒÈ’„UÊ ∞fl¥ Á¡¥ŒÊ ª˝Ê◊Ê¥ ∑§Ë ¬Ífl˸ ‚Ë◊Ê Ã∑§.
ŒÁˇÊáÊ ◊¥ —
ª˝Ê◊ Á¡¥ŒÊ, ∑ȧ≈U∑§Ë¬Ê⁄UÊ, ÷Œ‹Ë ∞fl¥ Á‹◊Ê ª˝Ê◊Ê¥ ∑§Ë ŒÁˇÊáÊË ‚Ë◊Ê Ã∑§.
¬Á‡ø◊ ◊¥ —
ª˝Ê◊ ‹Ë◊Ê, ¡ÈŸflÊŸË, ◊ª⁄UŒÊ ∞fl¥ ÉÊÈÉÊ⁄UË∑§‹Ê ª˝Ê◊Ê¥ ∑§Ë ¬Á‡ø◊Ë ‚Ë◊Ê Ã∑§.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ∑§ ⁄UÊíÿ¬Ê‹ ∑§ ŸÊ◊ ‚ ÃÕÊ •ÊŒ‡ÊÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U,
÷Ê‚∑§⁄U Áfl‹Ê‚ ‚¥ÁŒ¬ÊŸ, ‚¥ÿÈÄà ‚Áøfl.
ÁflÁäÊ •ÊÒ⁄U ÁfläÊÊÿË ∑§Êÿ¸ Áfl÷ʪ
◊¢òÊÊ‹ÿ, ◊„UÊŸŒËU ÷flŸ, ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄
ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ } ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ z{{{/vzz{/wv-’/¿U.ª./wÆwÆ.ó⁄UÊíÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ, ∞ÃŒ˜mÊ⁄UÊ, •fl◊ÊŸŸÊ ¬˝∑§⁄UáÊÊ¥ ◊¥ ‡ÊÊ‚∑§Ëÿ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË/∑§◊¸øÊ⁄UË ∑§Ë •Ê⁄U ‚
¬ˇÊ ‚◊Õ¸Ÿ ∑§⁄UŸ ∑§ Á‹ÿ ÁŸÿÈÄà ÁflÁäÊ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË/•ÁäÊflÄÃÊ ∑§Ê ¬˝àÿ∑§ ¬˝÷ÊflË ‚ÈŸflÊ߸U ÁÃÁÕ „UÃÈ ¬Ífl¸ ◊¥ ¡Ê⁄UË ‚◊Sà •ÊŒ‡Ê ∑§Ê ÁŸ⁄USà ∑§⁄UÃ
„ÈU∞ ÿ„U •ÊŒ‡Ê ŒÃÊ „ÒU Á∑§ ó
(v)
•fl◊ÊŸŸÊ ¬˝∑§⁄UáÊÊ¥ ◊¥ ¬˝àÿ∑§ ¬˝∑§⁄UáÊ „UÃÈ (øÊ„U ‚ÈŸflÊ߸U ÁÃÁÕ Á∑§ÃŸË ÷Ë „UÊ) ‚◊Á∑§Ã »§Ë‚ L§. wÆ,ÆÆÆ/- ÁŸÿà Á∑§ÿÊ ¡ÊÃÊ „ÒU.
‚ÊÕ „UË ∞∑§ „UË ◊Í‹ ¬˝∑§⁄UáÊ ‚ ©UŒ˜÷Íà •ãÿ ‚◊ÊŸ •fl◊ÊŸŸÊ ¬˝∑§⁄UáÊ ∑§ Á‹ÿ, Á¡‚◊¥ •ÊflŒ∑§ ∞∑§ „UË „UÊ, ¬⁄UãÃÈ •ŸÊflŒ∑§
(•fl◊ÊŸŸÊ∑§Ãʸ) ‡ÊÊ‚∑§Ëÿ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË/∑§◊¸øÊ⁄UË ¬ÎÕ∑§-¬ÎÕ∑§ „UÊ, fl„UÊ¥ ¬⁄U L§. z,ÆÆÆ/- ¬˝àÿ∑§ •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝∑§⁄UáÊ/¬˝àÿ∑§ •fl◊ÊŸŸÊ∑§Ãʸ
•ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË/∑§◊¸øÊ⁄UË ∑§Ë Œ⁄U ‚ •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ÷ȪÃÊŸ Á∑§ÿÊ ¡Êÿ.
(w)
Á¡‚ •fl◊ÊŸŸÊ ¬˝∑§⁄UáÊ ◊¥ ∞∑§ ‚ •ÁäÊ∑§ •ŸÊflŒ∑§ (•fl◊ÊŸŸÊ∑§Ãʸ) „UÊ fl„UÊ¥ ¬⁄U »§Ë‚ ∑§Ê ÷ȪÃÊŸ, ‚◊Sà •ŸÊflŒ∑§ (•fl◊ÊŸŸÊ∑§Ãʸ)
∑§Ë •Ê⁄U ‚ ¬˝Õ◊ •ŸÊflŒ∑§ (•fl◊ÊŸŸÊ∑§Ãʸ) ∑§Ë •Ê⁄U ‚ „UË Á∑§ÿÊ ¡Êfl.
©U¬ÿÈÄà ◊ÊŸŒ¥«U ∑§ •ŸÈ‚Ê⁄U ‚¥’¥ÁäÊà •ÁäÊflÄÃÊ ∑§ »§Ë‚ ∑§Ê √ÿÿ ©U‚Ë ◊Ê¥ª ‚¥ÅÿÊ ∞fl¥ ‡ÊË·¸ ∑§ •¥Ãª¸Ã Áfl∑§‹ŸËÿ „UʪÊ,
Á¡‚∑§ •¥Ãª¸Ã ‚¥’¥ÁäÊà •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË/∑§◊¸øÊ⁄UË (¬˝Õ◊ •ŸÊflŒ∑§/•fl◊ÊŸŸÊ∑§Ãʸ) ∑§ flß ÷ûÊ •ÊÁŒ •Ê„UÁ⁄Uà Á∑§ÿ ¡Ê ⁄U„U „ÒU.
ÿ„U SflË∑ΧÁà ÁflûÊ Áfl÷ʪ ∑§ ¡Êfl∑§ ∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ z|{/’-x/wÆwÆ ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ v{-Æ{-wÆwÆ ∑§ mÊ⁄UÊ ¬˝ŒÊŸ ∑§Ë ªß¸U „ÒU.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ∑§ ⁄UÊíÿ¬Ê‹ ∑§ ŸÊ◊ ‚ ÃÕÊ •ÊŒ‡ÊÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U,
∞Ÿ. ∑§. øãº˝fl¥‡ÊË, ¬˝◊Èπ ‚Áøfl.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
[ ÷ʪ v
618
⁄UÊ¡Sfl Áfl÷ʪ
∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ, ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê ∑§Ê⁄U’Ê, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ∞fl¢ ¬ŒŸ ©U¬-‚Áøfl, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ, ⁄UÊ¡Sfl ∞fl¥ •Ê¬ŒÊ
¬˝’¥äÊŸ Áfl÷ʪ
∑§Ê⁄U’Ê, ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ vw ¡ÍŸ wÆwÆ
¬˝ÊM§¬-∞∑§
(ÁŸÿ◊ vv ŒÁπÿ)
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§/~vxx/÷Í-•¡¸Ÿ/wÆwÆ.ó÷ÍÁ◊-•¡¸Ÿ, ¬ÈŸflʸ‚Ÿ ∞fl¥ ¬ÈŸ√ÿ¸flSÕʬŸ ◊¥ ©UÁøà ¬˝ÁÃ∑§⁄U ÃÕÊ ¬Ê⁄UŒÁ‡Ê¸ÃÊ ∑§Ê •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄U •ÁäÊÁŸÿ◊,
wÆvx ∑§Ë äÊÊ⁄UÊ y ‚„U¬Á∆Uà ÁŸÿ◊ | ∑§ •¥Ãª¸Ã ŸËø •ŸÈ‚ÍøË ◊¥ ©UÀ‹Áπà ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§Ê •¡¸Ÿ ‹Ê∑§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ „UÃÈ ⁄UÊíÿ ‚⁄U∑§Ê⁄U mÊ⁄UÊ •Ê‡ÊÁÿà „ÒU,
•ÕʸØ —ó
Á¡‹Ê
ÄU‚Ë‹
ª˝Ê◊/Ÿª⁄U
ˇÊòÊ»§‹
‹Ê∑§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ ∑§Ê Áflfl⁄UáÊ
(v)
(w)
(x)
(y)
(z)
∑§Ê⁄U’Ê
∑§≈UÉÊÊ⁄UÊ
¡≈UÊ¥ª¬È⁄U
y.{zw „UÄ≈ÿ⁄U
¡≈UÊ¥ª¬È⁄U ∞ŸË∑§≈U ÿÊ¡ŸÊ ∑§ «ÍU’ÊŸ ˇÊòÊ „UÃÈ.
U
©U¬⁄UÊÄà ©UÀ‹Áπà ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§ •¡¸Ÿ „UÃÈ ‚Ê◊ÊÁ¡∑§ ‚◊ÊÉÊÊà ÁŸäÊʸ⁄UáÊ ∑§ •äÿÿŸ „UÃÈ ¡Ÿ ‚ÈŸflÊ߸U ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ w~-{-wÆwÆ ∑§Ê ‚◊ÿ
Æw.ÆÆ ’¡ ‚ SÕÊŸ ª˝Ê◊ ¬¥øÊÿà ÷flŸ ¬¥«U⁄UË¬ÊŸË ¬⁄U ÁŸÿà ∑§Ë ªß¸U „ÒU. ¬˝SÃÊÁflà ÷ÍÁ◊ •¡¸Ÿ ∑§Ê •ãÿ Áflfl⁄UáÊ ÁŸêŸÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U „ÒU —ó
v.
‹Ê∑§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ ∑§Ê ‚¥ÁˇÊåà Áflfl⁄UáÊ
ó
¡≈UÊ¥ª¬È⁄U ∞ŸË∑§≈U ÿÊ¡ŸÊ ∑§ Ÿ„U⁄U ÁŸ◊ʸáÊ „UÃÈ.
w.
¬˝àÿˇÊ M§¬ ‚ ¬˝÷ÊÁflà ¬Á⁄UflÊ⁄UÊ¥ ∑§Ë ‚¥ÅÿÊ
ó
Æ{ ¬Á⁄UflÊ⁄U
x.
•¬˝àÿˇÊ M§¬ ‚ ¬˝÷ÊÁflà ¬Á⁄UflÊ⁄UÊ¥ ∑§Ë ‚¥ÅÿÊ
ó
Æ{ ¬Á⁄UflÊ⁄U
y.
¬˝÷ÊÁflà ˇÊòÊ ◊¥ ÁŸ¡Ë ◊∑§ÊŸÊ¥ ÃÕÊ •ãÿ ¬Á⁄U‚ê¬ÁûÊÿÊ¥ó
ÁŸ⁄¥U∑§
∑§Ë •ŸÈ◊ÊÁŸÃ ‚¥ÅÿÊ.
z.
¬˝÷ÊÁflà ˇÊòÊ ◊¥ ‡ÊÊ‚∑§Ëÿ ◊∑§ÊŸÊ¥ ÃÕÊ •ãÿ
ó
ÁŸ⁄¥U∑§
¬Á⁄U‚ê¬ÁûÊÿÊ¥ ∑§Ë •ŸÈ◊ÊÁŸÃ ‚¥ÅÿÊ.
{.
ÄÿÊ ¬˝SÃÊÁflà •¡¸Ÿ ãÿÍŸÃ◊ „ÒU ?
ó
„UÊ¥
|.
ÄÿÊ ‚¥÷fl Áfl∑§À¬Ê¥ •ÊÒ⁄U ßU‚∑§Ë ‚ÊäÿÃÊ ¬⁄U ÁfløÊ⁄U
ó
„UÊ¥
∑§⁄U Á‹ÿÊ ªÿÊ „ÒU ?
}.
¬Á⁄UÿÊ¡ŸÊ ∑§Ë ∑ȧ‹ ‹ÊªÃ
ó
L§. xv|.zx ‹Êπ
~.
¬Á⁄UÿÊ¡ŸÊ ‚ „UÊŸ flÊ‹ ‹Ê÷
ó
¬Á⁄UÿÊ¡ŸÊ ‚ wz „U. ◊¥ π⁄UË»§ Á‚¥øÊ߸U ‚ÈÁfläÊÊ ©Um„UŸ
Á‚¥øÊ߸U mÊ⁄UÊ (Sflÿ¥ ∑§ πø¸ ¬⁄U) ©U¬‹éäÊ ∑§⁄UÊ߸U ¡ÊflªË.
vÆ.
¬˝SÃÊÁflà ‚Ê◊ÊÁ¡∑§ ‚◊ÊÉÊÊà ∑§Ë ¬˝ÁìÍÁø ∑§ Á‹ÿ
ó
¬˝SÃÊÁflà ‚Ê◊ÊÁ¡∑§ ‚◊ÊÉÊÊà ∑§Ë ¬˝ÁìÍÁø ∑§ Á‹ÿ
©U¬Êÿ ÃÕÊ ©U‚ ¬⁄U „UÊŸ flÊ‹Ê ‚¥÷ÊÁflà √ÿÿ.
‚¥÷ÊÁflà ©U¬Êÿ Á∑§ÿ ¡Ê ⁄U„U „Ò¥U ÃÕÊ ©U‚¬⁄U „UÊŸ flÊ‹Ê
‚¥÷ÊÁflà √ÿÿ ∑§Ê ¬˝ÊfläÊÊŸ Á∑§ÿÊ ªÿÊ „ÒU.
vv.
¬Á⁄UÿÊ¡ŸÊ mÊ⁄UÊ ¬˝÷ÊÁflà „UÊŸ flÊ‹ •ãÿ ÉÊ≈U∑§
ó
ÁŸ⁄¥U∑§
©U¬⁄UÊÄà ÷ÍÁ◊ •¡¸Ÿ ∑§ ‚¥’¥äÊ ◊¥ Á∑§‚Ë √ÿÁÄÃ/‚¥SÕÊ ÿÊ •ãÿ Á∑§‚Ë √ÿÁÄà ∑§Ê ∑§Ê߸U ¡ÊŸ∑§Ê⁄UË/‚ȤÊÊfl ŒŸÊ „UÊ, ÃÊ ÁflÁ„Uà ÁÃÁÕ/‚◊ÿ
∞fl¥ SÕÊŸ ¬⁄U ŒË ¡Ê ‚∑§ªË.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
÷ʪ v ]
619
∑§Ê⁄U’Ê, ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ vz ¡ÍŸ wÆwÆ
¬˝ÊM§¬-∞∑§
(ÁŸÿ◊ vv ŒÁπÿ)
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§/~wÆ{/÷Í-•¡¸Ÿ/wÆwÆ.ó÷ÍÁ◊-•¡¸Ÿ, ¬ÈŸflʸ‚Ÿ ∞fl¥ ¬ÈŸ√ÿ¸flSÕʬŸ ◊¥ ©UÁøà ¬˝ÁÃ∑§⁄U ÃÕÊ ¬Ê⁄UŒÁ‡Ê¸ÃÊ ∑§Ê •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄U •ÁäÊÁŸÿ◊,
wÆvx ∑§Ë äÊÊ⁄UÊ y ‚„U¬Á∆Uà ÁŸÿ◊ | ∑§ •¥Ãª¸Ã ŸËø •ŸÈ‚ÍøË ◊¥ ©UÀ‹Áπà ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§Ê •¡¸Ÿ ‹Ê∑§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ „UÃÈ ⁄UÊíÿ ‚⁄U∑§Ê⁄U mÊ⁄UÊ •Ê‡ÊÁÿà „ÒU,
•ÕʸØ —ó
Á¡‹Ê
ÄU‚Ë‹
ª˝Ê◊/Ÿª⁄U
ˇÊòÊ»§‹
‹Ê∑§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ ∑§Ê Áflfl⁄UáÊ
(v)
(w)
(x)
(y)
(z)
∑§Ê⁄U’Ê
∑§≈UÉÊÊ⁄UÊ
‚ÈÄ‹ÊπÊ⁄U
y.~zz „UÄ≈ÿ⁄U
∑§≈UÉÊÊ⁄UÊ √ÿ¬fløŸ ÿÊ¡ŸÊ ∑§ Ÿ„U⁄U ÁŸ◊ʸáÊ „UÃÈ.
U
©U¬⁄UÊÄà ©UÀ‹Áπà ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§ •¡¸Ÿ „UÃÈ ‚Ê◊ÊÁ¡∑§ ‚◊ÊÉÊÊà ÁŸäÊʸ⁄UáÊ ∑§ •äÿÿŸ „UÃÈ ¡Ÿ ‚ÈŸflÊ߸U ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ }-|-wÆwÆ ∑§Ê ‚◊ÿ
Æw.ÆÆ ’¡ ‚ SÕÊŸ ª˝Ê◊ ¬¥øÊÿà ÷flŸ ‚ÈÄ‹ÊπÊ⁄U ¬⁄U ÁŸÿà ∑§Ë ªß¸U „ÒU. ¬˝SÃÊÁflà ÷ÍÁ◊ •¡¸Ÿ ∑§Ê •ãÿ Áflfl⁄UáÊ ÁŸêŸÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U „ÒU —ó
v.
‹Ê∑§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ ∑§Ê ‚¥ÁˇÊåà Áflfl⁄UáÊ
ó
∑§≈UÉÊÊ⁄UÊ √ÿ¬fløŸ ÿÊ¡ŸÊ ∑§ Ÿ„U⁄U ÁŸ◊ʸáÊ „UÃÈ.
w.
¬˝àÿˇÊ M§¬ ‚ ¬˝÷ÊÁflà ¬Á⁄UflÊ⁄UÊ¥ ∑§Ë ‚¥ÅÿÊ
ó
zy ¬Á⁄UflÊ⁄U
x.
•¬˝àÿˇÊ M§¬ ‚ ¬˝÷ÊÁflà ¬Á⁄UflÊ⁄UÊ¥ ∑§Ë ‚¥ÅÿÊ
ó
zy ¬Á⁄UflÊ⁄U
y.
¬˝÷ÊÁflà ˇÊòÊ ◊¥ ÁŸ¡Ë ◊∑§ÊŸÊ¥ ÃÕÊ •ãÿ ¬Á⁄U‚ê¬ÁûÊÿÊ¥ó
ÁŸ⁄¥U∑§
∑§Ë •ŸÈ◊ÊÁŸÃ ‚¥ÅÿÊ.
z.
¬˝÷ÊÁflà ˇÊòÊ ◊¥ ‡ÊÊ‚∑§Ëÿ ◊∑§ÊŸÊ¥ ÃÕÊ •ãÿ
ó
ÁŸ⁄¥U∑§
¬Á⁄U‚ê¬ÁûÊÿÊ¥ ∑§Ë •ŸÈ◊ÊÁŸÃ ‚¥ÅÿÊ.
{.
ÄÿÊ ¬˝SÃÊÁflà •¡¸Ÿ ãÿÍŸÃ◊ „ÒU ?
ó
„UÊ¥
|.
ÄÿÊ ‚¥÷fl Áfl∑§À¬Ê¥ •ÊÒ⁄U ßU‚∑§Ë ‚ÊäÿÃÊ ¬⁄U ÁfløÊ⁄U
ó
„UÊ¥
∑§⁄U Á‹ÿÊ ªÿÊ „ÒU ?
}.
¬Á⁄UÿÊ¡ŸÊ ∑§Ë ∑ȧ‹ ‹ÊªÃ
ó
L§. z{Æ|.{{ ‹Êπ
~.
¬Á⁄UÿÊ¡ŸÊ ‚ „UÊŸ flÊ‹ ‹Ê÷
ó
¬Á⁄UÿÊ¡ŸÊ ‚ v~~v „U. ◊¥ π⁄UË»§ Á‚¥øÊ߸U ‚ÈÁfläÊÊ ©U¬‹éäÊ
∑§⁄UÊ߸U ¡ÊflªË.
vÆ.
¬˝SÃÊÁflà ‚Ê◊ÊÁ¡∑§ ‚◊ÊÉÊÊà ∑§Ë ¬˝ÁìÍÁø ∑§ Á‹ÿ
ó
¬˝SÃÊÁflà ‚Ê◊ÊÁ¡∑§ ‚◊ÊÉÊÊà ∑§Ë ¬˝ÁìÍÁø ∑§ Á‹ÿ
©U¬Êÿ ÃÕÊ ©U‚ ¬⁄U „UÊŸ flÊ‹Ê ‚¥÷ÊÁflà √ÿÿ.
‚¥÷ÊÁflà ©U¬Êÿ Á∑§ÿ ¡Ê ⁄U„U „Ò¥U ÃÕÊ ©U‚¬⁄U „UÊŸ flÊ‹Ê
‚¥÷ÊÁflà √ÿÿ ∑§Ê ¬˝ÊfläÊÊŸ Á∑§ÿÊ ªÿÊ „ÒU.
vv.
¬Á⁄UÿÊ¡ŸÊ mÊ⁄UÊ ¬˝÷ÊÁflà „UÊŸ flÊ‹ •ãÿ ÉÊ≈U∑§
ó
ÁŸ⁄¥U∑§
©U¬⁄UÊÄà ÷ÍÁ◊ •¡¸Ÿ ∑§ ‚¥’¥äÊ ◊¥ Á∑§‚Ë √ÿÁÄÃ/‚¥SÕÊ ÿÊ •ãÿ Á∑§‚Ë √ÿÁÄà ∑§Ê ∑§Ê߸U ¡ÊŸ∑§Ê⁄UË/‚ȤÊÊfl ŒŸÊ „UÊ, ÃÊ ÁflÁ„Uà ÁÃÁÕ/‚◊ÿ
∞fl¥ SÕÊŸ ¬⁄U ŒË ¡Ê ‚∑§ªË.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ∑§ ⁄UÊíÿ¬Ê‹ ∑§ ŸÊ◊ ‚ ÃÕÊ •ÊŒ‡ÊÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U,
Á∑§⁄UáÊ ∑§Ê҇ʋ, ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U ∞fl¥ ¬ŒŸ ©U¬-‚Áøfl.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
[ ÷ʪ v
620
∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ, ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê-∑§Ê⁄U’Ê (¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U),U ∞fl¢ ¬ŒŸ ©U¬-‚Áøfl, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ, ⁄UÊ¡Sfl ∞fl¥
•Ê¬ŒÊ ¬˝’¥äÊŸ Áfl÷ʪ
∑§Ê⁄U’Ê, ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ vw ¡ÍŸ wÆwÆ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§/~vxÆ/÷Í-•¡¸Ÿ/wÆwÆ.óøÍ¢Á∑§ ⁄UÊÖÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∑§Ê ÿ„U ¬˝ÃËà „UÊÃÊ „ÒU Á∑§ ß‚‚ ‚¢‹ÇŸ •ŸÈ‚ÍøË ∑§ πÊŸ (v) ‚ (y) ◊¥
flÁáʸà ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§Ë •ŸÈ‚ÍøË ∑§ πÊŸ ({) ◊¥ ©U‚∑§ ‚Ê◊Ÿ ÁŒÿ ªÿ ‚Êfl¸¡ÁŸ∑§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ ∑§ Á‹ÿ •Êfl‡ÿ∑§ÃÊ „ÒU •ÕflÊ •Êfl‡ÿ∑§ÃÊ ¬«∏UŸ ∑§Ë
‚¢÷ÊflŸÊ „ÒU. •Ã— ÷ÍÁ◊ •¡¸Ÿ, ¬ÈŸflʸ‚Ÿ •ÊÒ⁄U ¬ÈŸ√ÿ¸flSÕʬŸ ◊¥ ©UÁøà ¬˝ÁÃ∑§⁄U •ÊÒ⁄U ¬Ê⁄UŒÁ‡Ê¸ÃÊ ∑§Ê •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄U •ÁäÊÁŸÿ◊, wÆvx (Á¡‚ ∞ÃŒ˜
¬‡øÊØ •ÁäÊÁŸÿ◊ wÆvx ∑§„UÊ ¡ÊflªÊ) ∑§Ë äÊÊ⁄UÊ vv ∑§Ë ©U¬-äÊÊ⁄UÊ (v) ∑§ ©U¬’¥äÊÊ¥ ∑§ •ŸÈ‚Ê⁄U ‚÷Ë ‚¥’¥ÁäÊà √ÿÁQ§ÿÊ¥ ∑§Ê ßU‚∑§ mÊ⁄UÊ ßU‚
•Ê‡Êÿ ∑§Ë ‚ÍøŸÊ ŒË ¡ÊÃË „ÒU Á∑§ ⁄UÊíÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∞ÃŒ˜mÊ⁄UÊ •ŸÈ‚ÍøË ∑§ πÊŸ (z) ◊¥ ©UÀ‹Áπà ¬˝ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË ∑§Ê ©UÄà ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§ ‚¥’¥äÊ ◊¥ äÊÊ⁄UÊ vw ∑§
•¥Ãª¸Ã ŒË ªÿË ‡ÊÁÄÃÿÊ¥ ∑§Ê ¬˝ÿʪ ∑§⁄UŸ ∑§ Á‹∞ ¬˝ÊÁäÊ∑Χà ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU —ó
•ŸÈ‚ÍøË
÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§Ê fláʸŸ
œÊ⁄UÊ vw ∑§ mÊ⁄UÊ ‚Êfl¸¡ÁŸ∑§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ
Á¡‹Ê
ÄU‚Ë‹
Ÿª⁄U/ª˝Ê◊
‹ª÷ª ˇÊòÊ»§‹
¬˝ÊÁœ∑Χà •Áœ∑§Ê⁄UË
∑§Ê fláʸŸ
(„UÄ≈Uÿ⁄U ◊¥)
(v)
(w)
(x)
(y)
(z)
({)
∑§Ê⁄U’Ê
∑§≈UÉÊÊ⁄UÊ
∑§‚⁄‘¥UªÊ
v.|{{
∑§Êÿ¸¬Ê‹Ÿ •Á÷ÿ¥ÃÊ, ¡‹ ‚¥‚ÊäÊŸ
∑§≈UÉÊÊ⁄UÊ √ÿ¬fløŸ
¬.„U.Ÿ¥. Æ}
‚¥÷ʪ, ∑§Ê⁄U’Ê.
ÿÊ¡ŸÊ ∑§ ‡ÊÊπÊ Ÿ„U⁄U
ÁŸ◊ʸáÊ.
÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§Ê ŸÄ‡ÊÊ (å‹ÊŸ) ∑§Ê ÁŸ⁄UˡÊáÊ •ŸÈÁfl÷ʪËÿ •ÁäÊ∑§⁄UË (⁄UÊ¡Sfl), ∑§≈UÉÊÊ⁄UÊ ∑§ ∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ ◊¥ Á∑§ÿÊ ¡Ê ‚∑§ÃÊ „ÒU.
∑§Ê⁄U’Ê, ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ vw ¡ÍŸ wÆwÆ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§/~vzy/÷Í-•¡¸Ÿ/wÆwÆ.óøÍ¢Á∑§ ⁄UÊÖÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∑§Ê ÿ„U ¬˝ÃËà „UÊÃÊ „ÒU Á∑§ ß‚‚ ‚¢‹ÇŸ •ŸÈ‚ÍøË ∑§ πÊŸ (v) ‚ (y) ◊¥
flÁáʸà ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§Ë •ŸÈ‚ÍøË ∑§ πÊŸ ({) ◊¥ ©U‚∑§ ‚Ê◊Ÿ ÁŒÿ ªÿ ‚Êfl¸¡ÁŸ∑§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ ∑§ Á‹ÿ •Êfl‡ÿ∑§ÃÊ „ÒU •ÕflÊ •Êfl‡ÿ∑§ÃÊ ¬«∏UŸ ∑§Ë
‚¢÷ÊflŸÊ „ÒU. •Ã— ÷ÍÁ◊ •¡¸Ÿ, ¬ÈŸflʸ‚Ÿ •ÊÒ⁄U ¬ÈŸ√ÿ¸flSÕʬŸ ◊¥ ©UÁøà ¬˝ÁÃ∑§⁄U •ÊÒ⁄U ¬Ê⁄UŒÁ‡Ê¸ÃÊ ∑§Ê •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄U •ÁäÊÁŸÿ◊, wÆvx (Á¡‚ ∞ÃŒ˜
¬‡øÊØ •ÁäÊÁŸÿ◊ wÆvx ∑§„UÊ ¡ÊflªÊ) ∑§Ë äÊÊ⁄UÊ vv ∑§Ë ©U¬-äÊÊ⁄UÊ (v) ∑§ ©U¬’¥äÊÊ¥ ∑§ •ŸÈ‚Ê⁄U ‚÷Ë ‚¥’¥ÁäÊà √ÿÁQ§ÿÊ¥ ∑§Ê ßU‚∑§ mÊ⁄UÊ ßU‚
•Ê‡Êÿ ∑§Ë ‚ÍøŸÊ ŒË ¡ÊÃË „ÒU Á∑§ ⁄UÊíÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∞ÃŒ˜mÊ⁄UÊ •ŸÈ‚ÍøË ∑§ πÊŸ (z) ◊¥ ©UÀ‹Áπà ¬˝ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË ∑§Ê ©UÄà ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§ ‚¥’¥äÊ ◊¥ äÊÊ⁄UÊ vw ∑§
•¥Ãª¸Ã ŒË ªÿË ‡ÊÁÄÃÿÊ¥ ∑§Ê ¬˝ÿʪ ∑§⁄UŸ ∑§ Á‹∞ ¬˝ÊÁäÊ∑Χà ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU —ó
•ŸÈ‚ÍøË
÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§Ê fláʸŸ
œÊ⁄UÊ vw ∑§ mÊ⁄UÊ ‚Êfl¸¡ÁŸ∑§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ
Á¡‹Ê
ÄU‚Ë‹
Ÿª⁄U/ª˝Ê◊
‹ª÷ª ˇÊòÊ»§‹
¬˝ÊÁœ∑Χà •Áœ∑§Ê⁄UË
∑§Ê fláʸŸ
(„UÄ≈Uÿ⁄U ◊¥)
(v)
(w)
(x)
(y)
(z)
({)
∑§Ê⁄U’Ê
∑§≈UÉÊÊ⁄UÊ
…U¬…U¬
w.|y{
∑§Êÿ¸¬Ê‹Ÿ •Á÷ÿ¥ÃÊ, ¡‹ ‚¥‚ÊäÊŸ
∑§≈UÉÊÊ⁄UÊ √ÿ¬fløŸ
¬.„U.Ÿ¥. Æ}
‚¥÷ʪ, ∑§Ê⁄U’Ê.
ÿÊ¡ŸÊ ∑§ ‡ÊÊπÊ Ÿ„U⁄U
ÁŸ◊ʸáÊ.
÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§Ê ŸÄ‡ÊÊ (å‹ÊŸ) ∑§Ê ÁŸ⁄UˡÊáÊ •ŸÈÁfl÷ʪËÿ •ÁäÊ∑§⁄UË (⁄UÊ¡Sfl), ∑§≈UÉÊÊ⁄UÊ ∑§ ∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ ◊¥ Á∑§ÿÊ ¡Ê ‚∑§ÃÊ „ÒU.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ∑§ ⁄UÊíÿ¬Ê‹ ∑§ ŸÊ◊ ‚ ÃÕÊ •ÊŒ‡ÊÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U,
Á∑§⁄UáÊ ∑§Ê҇ʋ, ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U ∞fl¥ ¬ŒŸ ©U¬-‚Áøfl.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
÷ʪ v ]
621
∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ, ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê ©UûÊ⁄U ’SÃ⁄U ∑§Ê¥∑§⁄U,
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ∞fl¢ ¬ŒŸ ©U¬ ‚Áøfl, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ,
⁄UÊ¡Sfl ∞fl¥ •Ê¬ŒÊ ¬˝’¥äÊŸ Áfl÷ʪ
∑§Ê¥∑§⁄U, ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ ww ¡ÍŸ wÆwÆ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§/wxv~/flÊ./÷Í.•./¬˝.∑˝§./z/•-}w/wÆv{-v|.óøÍ¢Á∑§
⁄UÊÖÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∑§Ê ß‚ ’Êà ∑§Ê ‚◊ʜʟ „UÊ ªÿÊ „ÒU Á∑§ ŸËø ŒË ªß¸
•ŸÈ‚ÍøË ∑§ ¬Œ (v) ◊¥ flÁáʸà ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§Ë •ŸÈ‚ÍøË ∑§ ¬Œ (w) ◊¥
©UÀ‹Áπà ‚Êfl¸¡ÁŸ∑§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ ∑§ Á‹∞ •Êfl‡ÿ∑§ÃÊ „ÒU. •Ã— ÷ÍÁ◊
•¡¸Ÿ, ¬ÈŸflʸ‚Ÿ •ÊÒ⁄U ¬ÈŸ√ÿ¸flSÕʬŸ ◊¥ ©UÁøà ¬˝ÁÃ∑§⁄U •ÊÒ⁄U ¬Ê⁄UŒÁ‡Ê¸ÃÊ
∑§Ê •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄U •ÁœÁŸÿ◊, wÆvx (Á¡‚ ∞ÃŒ˜ ¬‡øÊØ •ÁäÊÁŸÿ◊,
wÆvx ∑§„UÊ ¡ÊÿªÊ) ∑§Ë œÊ⁄UÊ v~ ∑§ •ãê¸Ã ß‚∑§ mÊ⁄UÊ ÿ„U ÉÊÊÁ·Ã
Á∑§ÿÊ ¡ÊÃÊ „ÒU Á∑§ ©UQ§ ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§Ë ©UQ§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ ∑§ Á‹∞ •Êfl‡ÿ∑§ÃÊ
„ÒU —ó
•ŸÈ‚ÍøË
(v) ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§Ê fláʸŸ-
(∑§) Á¡‹Ê-©UûÊ⁄U ’SÃ⁄U ∑§Ê¥∑§⁄U
(π) ÄU‚Ë‹-•¥Ãʪ…∏U
(ª) Ÿª⁄U/ª˝Ê◊-∞≈UªÊ¥fl
(ÉÊ) ‹ª÷ª ˇÊòÊ»§‹-Æ.}~ „UÄ≈Uÿ⁄U
π‚⁄UÊ Ÿê’⁄U
⁄U∑§’Ê
(„UÄ≈Uÿ⁄U ◊¥)
(v)
(w)
}w/w
Æ.Æ{
w{/w
Æ.v}
|z
Æ.Æ~
|{
Æ.Æ|
|y/v
Æ.Æw
|y/w
Æ.Æ|
|x/v
Æ.Æ}
|w
Æ.Æx
|v
Æ.Æ~
{~
Æ.Æw
{}
Æ.Æx
{{
Æ.Æv
xz/w
Æ.Æy
xz/v
Æ.vÆ
ÿʪ
vy
Æ.}~
(w) ‚Êfl¸¡ÁŸ∑§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ Á¡‚∑§ Á‹∞ •Êfl‡ÿ∑§ÃÊ „ÒU-⁄UÊ¡¬È⁄U √ÿ¬fløŸ
ÿÊ¡ŸÊ •¥Ãª¸Ã Ÿ„U⁄U ÁŸ◊ʸáÊ „UÃÈ.
(x) ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§Ê§ŸÄ‡ÊÊ (å‹ÊŸ) ∑§Ê ÁŸ⁄UˡÊáÊ •ŸÈÁfl÷ʪËÿ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË
(⁄UÊ)/÷Í-•¡¸Ÿ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, •¥Ãʪ…∏U ∑§ ∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ ◊¥ Á∑§ÿÊ ¡Ê
‚∑§ÃÊ „ÒU.
∑§Ê¥∑§⁄U, ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ ww ¡ÍŸ wÆwÆ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§/wxwÆ/flÊ./÷Í.•./¬˝.∑˝§./{/•-}w/wÆv{-v|.óøÍ¢Á∑§
⁄UÊÖÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∑§Ê ß‚ ’Êà ∑§Ê ‚◊ʜʟ „UÊ ªÿÊ „ÒU Á∑§ ŸËø ŒË ªß¸
•ŸÈ‚ÍøË ∑§ ¬Œ (v) ◊¥ flÁáʸà ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§Ë •ŸÈ‚ÍøË ∑§ ¬Œ (w) ◊¥
©UÀ‹Áπà ‚Êfl¸¡ÁŸ∑§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ ∑§ Á‹∞ •Êfl‡ÿ∑§ÃÊ „ÒU. •Ã— ÷ÍÁ◊
•¡¸Ÿ, ¬ÈŸflʸ‚Ÿ •ÊÒ⁄U ¬ÈŸ√ÿ¸flSÕʬŸ ◊¥ ©UÁøà ¬˝ÁÃ∑§⁄U •ÊÒ⁄U ¬Ê⁄UŒÁ‡Ê¸ÃÊ
∑§Ê •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄U •ÁœÁŸÿ◊, wÆvx (Á¡‚ ∞ÃŒ˜ ¬‡øÊØ •ÁäÊÁŸÿ◊,
wÆvx ∑§„UÊ ¡ÊÿªÊ) ∑§Ë œÊ⁄UÊ v~ ∑§ •ãê¸Ã ß‚∑§ mÊ⁄UÊ ÿ„U ÉÊÊÁ·Ã
Á∑§ÿÊ ¡ÊÃÊ „ÒU Á∑§ ©UQ§ ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§Ë ©UQ§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ ∑§ Á‹∞ •Êfl‡ÿ∑§ÃÊ
„ÒU —ó
•ŸÈ‚ÍøË
(v) ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§Ê fláʸŸ-
(∑§) Á¡‹Ê-©UûÊ⁄U ’SÃ⁄U ∑§Ê¥∑§⁄U
(π) ÄU‚Ë‹-•¥Ãʪ…∏U
(ª) Ÿª⁄U/ª˝Ê◊-•ÊÃÈ⁄U’«∏Ê
(ÉÊ) ‹ª÷ª ˇÊòÊ»§‹-w.z{ „UÄ≈Uÿ⁄U
π‚⁄UÊ Ÿê’⁄U
⁄U∑§’Ê
(„UÄ≈Uÿ⁄U ◊¥)
(v)
(w)
RF/|{y
Æ.w|
RF/|{y
Æ.vÆ
RF/|{y
Æ.v}
RF/|{y
Æ.vx
RF/|{y
Æ.wy
RF/|{y
Æ.vÆ
RF/|{y
Æ.vÆ
RF/|{y
Æ.Æ|
RF/|{y
Æ.z}
RF/|{y
Æ.|~
ÿʪ
vÆ
w.z{
(w) ‚Êfl¸¡ÁŸ∑§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ Á¡‚∑§ Á‹∞ •Êfl‡ÿ∑§ÃÊ „ÒU-•ÊÃÈ⁄U’«∏Ê
¡‹Ê‡Êÿ ÁŸ◊ʸáÊ ∑§Êÿ¸ „UÃÈ.
(x) ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§Ê§ŸÄ‡ÊÊ (å‹ÊŸ) ∑§Ê ÁŸ⁄UˡÊáÊ •ŸÈÁfl÷ʪËÿ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË
(⁄UÊ)/÷Í-•¡¸Ÿ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, •¥Ãʪ…∏U ∑§ ∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ ◊¥ Á∑§ÿÊ ¡Ê
‚∑§ÃÊ „ÒU.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ∑§ ⁄UÊíÿ¬Ê‹ ∑§ ŸÊ◊ ‚ ÃÕÊ •ÊŒ‡ÊÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U,
∑§. ∞‹. øÊÒ„UÊŸ, ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U ∞fl¥ ¬ŒŸ ©U¬-‚Áøfl.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
[ ÷ʪ v
622
Áfl÷ʪ ¬˝◊ÈπÊ¥ ∑§ •ÊŒ‡Ê
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊíÿ ÁfllÈà ÁŸÿÊ◊∑§ •Êÿʪ
Á‚¥øÊ߸U ∑§ÊÚ‹ÊŸË, ‡ÊÊ¥Áà Ÿª⁄U, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U
⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ v| ¡Ÿfl⁄UË, wÆwÆ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ }z/‚Ë.∞‚.߸U.•Ê⁄U.‚Ë./wÆwÆ.óÁfllÈà •ÁäÊÁŸÿ◊, wÆÆx (fl·¸ wÆÆx ∑§Ê ∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ x{) ∑§Ë äÊÊ⁄UÊ yw ∑§Ë ©U¬äÊÊ⁄UÊ (z), ({)
∞fl¥ (|) ‚„U¬Á∆Uà äÊÊ⁄UÊ v}v ∑§Ë ©U¬äÊÊ⁄UÊ (w) ∑§ πá«U (•Ê⁄U) ∞fl¥ (∞‚) ◊¥ ¬˝ŒûÊ ‡ÊÁÄÃÿÊ¥ ∑§Ê ¬˝ÿʪ ∑§⁄Uà „ÈU∞ ÃÕÊ ÿÕÊ ‚¥‡ÊÊÁäÊà ÁfllÈÃ
ÁŸÿ◊, wÆÆz ∑§ ¬˝ÊfläÊŸÊ¥ ∑§ •ŸÈ‚⁄UáÊ ◊¥, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊíÿ ÁfllÈà ÁŸÿÊ◊∑§ •Êÿʪ mÊ⁄UÊ ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊíÿ ÁfllÈà ÁŸÿÊ◊∑§ •Êÿʪ (©U¬÷ÊÄÃÊ
¬Á⁄UflŒŸÊ ÁŸflÊ⁄UáÊ) ÁflÁŸÿ◊ wÆvv, xÆ ◊߸U wÆvw ∑§Ê •ÁäÊ‚ÍÁøà Á∑§ÿÊ ªÿÊ ÕÊ.
•Êÿʪ •ŸÈ÷fl ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU Á∑§ Œÿ •¬Ë‹ ⁄UÊÁ‡Ê ∑§ ∞∑§ ÁÄUÊ߸U ⁄UÊÁ‡Ê ∑§Ê •¬Ë‹ ∑§ ¬Ífl¸ ¡◊Ê ∑§⁄UŸ ¡Ò‚ ’Êäÿ∑§Ê⁄UË ‡Êø, ¡Ò‚Ê Á∑§
©U¬⁄UÊÄà ©U¬÷ÊÄÃÊ ¬Á⁄UflŒŸÊ ÁŸflÊ⁄UáÊ, ÁflÁŸÿ◊Ê¥ ∑§ πá«U ∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ zz ◊¥ ¬˝ÊflÁäÊà „ÒU, ©U¬÷ÊÄÃÊ•Ê¥ ∑§Ê ãÿÊÿ ∑§ Á‹∞ ‹Ê∑§¬Ê‹ ∑§ ‚◊ˇÊ ¡ÊŸ
‚ „UÃÊà‚ÊÁ„Uà ∑§⁄UÃË „ÒU. ÿ„U √ÿʬ∑§ ¡ŸÁ„Uà ◊¥ ÃÕÊ ÁfllÈà •ÁäÊÁŸÿ◊, wÆÆx ∑§Ë ©UŒ˜ŒÁ‡ÿ∑§Ê ◊¥ flÁáʸà ©UŒ˜Œ‡ÿÊ¥ ∑§ •ŸÈM§¬ „UÊªÊ Á∑§ ©UÄÃ
πá«U ∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ zz ∑§Ê ©U¬÷ÊÄÃÊ ¬Á⁄UflŒŸÊ ÁŸflÊ⁄UáÊ, ÁflÁŸÿ◊Ê¥ ‚ Áfl‹ÊÁ¬Ã Á∑§ÿÊ ¡Êfl. ÁfllÈà •ÁäÊÁŸÿ◊, wÆÆx mÊ⁄UÊ •Êÿʪ ∑§Ê •ÊŒÁ‡Êà Á∑§ÿÊ
ªÿÊ „ÒU Á∑§ fl„U ©U¬÷ÊÄÃÊ•Ê¥ ∑§ Á„UÃÊ¥ ∑§Ê ‚¥⁄UˇÊáÊ ∑§⁄‘U •ÊÒ⁄U ¬ÿʸåà ∑§Ê⁄UáÊÊ¥ ÃÕÊ Ã∑¸§‚¥ªÃ „UÊŸ ∑§ •ÊäÊÊ⁄U ¬⁄U •Êÿʪ ∑§Ê ÿ„U ŒÎÁCU∑§ÊáÊ „ÒU Á∑§
©U¬⁄UÊÄà ¬˝ÊfläÊÊŸ ∑§Ê Áfl‹ÊÁ¬Ã ∑§⁄UŸ „UÃÈ ÁflÁŸÿÊ◊∑§ ¬˝Á∑˝§ÿÊ ∑§ •ŸÈ‚Ê⁄U ∑§Êÿ¸flÊ„UË ∑§⁄UŸ ∑§Ë •Êfl‡ÿ∑§ÃÊ Ÿ„UË¥ „ÒU. •Ã— •Êÿʪ ∞ÃŒ˜mÊ⁄UÊ
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊíÿ ÁfllÈà ÁŸÿÊ◊∑§ •Êÿʪ (©U¬÷ÊÄÃÊ ¬Á⁄UflŒŸÊ ÁŸflÊ⁄UáÊ) ÁflÁŸÿ◊ wÆvv ◊¥ ÁŸêŸÁ‹Áπà ‚¥‡ÊÊäÊŸ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU—
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊíÿ ÁfllÈà ÁŸÿÊ◊∑§ •Êÿʪ (©U¬÷ÊÄÃÊ ¬Á⁄UflŒŸÊ ÁŸflÊ⁄UáÊ) (¬˝Õ◊ ‚¥‡ÊÊäÊŸ) ÁflÁŸÿ◊, wÆwÆ
•äÿÊÿ-v
‚¥ÁˇÊåà ‡ÊË·¸∑§ ÃÕÊ ¬˝Ê⁄Uê÷
v.
ßUŸ ÁflÁŸÿ◊Ê¥ ∑§Ê ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊíÿ ÁfllÈà ÁŸÿÊ◊∑§ •Êÿʪ (©U¬÷ÊÄÃÊ ¬Á⁄UflŒŸÊ ÁŸflÊ⁄UáÊ) ÁflÁŸÿ◊, wÆvv ∑§„UÊ ¡ÊÿªÊ.
w.
ÿ ÁflÁŸÿ◊ ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊíÿ ◊¥ ‚÷Ë ÁflÃ⁄UáÊ •ŸÈôÊÁåÃäÊÊÁ⁄UÿÊ¥ ∑§Ê, ©UŸ‚ ‚¥’¥ÁäÊà •ŸÈôÊåà ˇÊòÊ ◊¥ ‹ÊªÍ „UÊ¥ª.
x.
ÿ ÁflÁŸÿ◊ ßUŸ∑§ ◊Í‹ ¬Ê∆U ∑§ ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ ◊¥ ¬˝∑§Ê‡ÊŸ ∑§Ë ÁÃÁÕ ‚ ¬˝÷Êfl‡ÊË‹ „UÊ¥ª.
¬Á⁄U÷Ê·Ê —
y.
ßUŸ ÁflÁŸÿ◊Ê¥ ◊¥, ¡’ Ã∑§ Á∑§ ‚¥Œ÷¸ ‚ •ãÿÕÊ •¬ÁˇÊà Ÿ „UÊ—
“◊Í‹ ÁflÁŸÿ◊Ê¥” ‚ •Á÷¬˝Ã „ÒU, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊíÿ ÁfllÈà ÁŸÿÊ◊∑§ •Êÿʪ (©U¬÷ÊÄÃÊ ¬Á⁄UflŒŸÊ ÁŸflÊ⁄UáÊ) ÁflÁŸÿ◊ wÆvv.
•äÿÊÿ-w
‚¥‡ÊÊäÊŸ
z.
◊Í‹ ÁflÁŸÿ◊Ê¥ ∑§Ê πá«U zz Áfl‹ÊÁ¬Ã Á∑§ÿÊ ¡ÊÃÊ „ÒU.
No. 85/CSERC/2020.—In exercise of the powers vested in the Commission under the provisions of sub-
section (5), (6) and (7) of Section 42 read with clauses (r) and (s) of sub-section (2) of Section 181 of the Electricity
Act, 2003 (36 of 2003) (the Act), and in pursuance of the provisions of Electricity Rules, 2005, as amended, the
Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission had notified the regulations namely Chhattisgarh State Elec-
tricity Regulatory Commission (Redressal of grievances of consumers) Regulations, 2011 on 04th March, 2011.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
÷ʪ v ]
623
The Commission feels that such a condition acts like deposits an amount equal to one third of the amount
due as appeal amount before filing of appeal, as provided in Clause No. 55 of Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regula-
tory Commission (Redressal of grievances of consumers) Regulations, 2011, is disincentive for the consumers from
approaching the Ombudsman for justice. This is in larger public interest and also in sync with the objective outlined
in the preamble to the Electricity Act, 2003. As per Electricity Act, 2003 the Commission is mandated to protect the
interests of the consumers and for the sufficient reasons and justifications, the Commission is of the view that for
omission of the said provision, there is no need to go through the regulatory process. Hence, the Commission hereby
makes the following amendment to the Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Redressal of griev-
ances of consumers) Regulations, 2011, namely :—
Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Redressal of grievances of consumers)
(First Amendment) Regulations, 2020
CHAPTER-1
SHORT TITLE AND COMMENCEMENT
1.
These regulations shall be called the Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Redressal of
grievances of consumers) (First Amendment) Regulations, 2020.
2.
These regulations shall be applicable to all distribution licensees in Chhattisgarh in their respective licensed
areas.
3.
There shall come into force from the date of their publication in Chhattisgarh Rajpatra.
Definition
4.
In these regulations, unless the context otherwise requires :
“Principal Regulations” means the Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Redressal of
grievances of consumers) Regulations, 2011.
CHAPTER-2
AMENDMENT
5.
Clause No. 55 of the principal Regulation is omitted.
•Êÿʪ ∑§ •ÊŒ‡ÊÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U,
∞‚. ¬Ë. ‡ÊÈÄ‹Ê,
‚Áøfl.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ‹Ê∑§ ‚flÊ •Êÿʪ
‡Ê¥∑§⁄U Ÿª⁄U ⁄UÊ«U, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U (¿U.ª.)
⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ y ¡ÍŸ wÆwÆ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§/wÆy/Æv/wÆwÆ-wv/SÕÊ.ó¿U.ª. ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ, ‚Ê◊Êãÿ ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ Áfl÷ʪ, ◊¥òÊÊ‹ÿ, ◊„UÊŸŒË ÷flŸ, ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U ∑§Ë •ÁäÊ‚ÍøŸÊ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ ∞»§ {-wy/wÆvv/∞∑§ (v) ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ xÆ-Æz-wÆwÆ ∑§ ÃÊ⁄UÃêÿ ◊¥ üÊË ≈UÊ◊Ÿ Á‚¥„U ‚ÊŸflÊŸË mÊ⁄UÊ ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ Æv-Æ{-wÆwÆ ∑§Ê
¬Íflʸã„U ◊¥ ‚ŒSÿ ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ∞fl¥ ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ‹Ê∑§ ‚flÊ •Êÿʪ ∑§ •äÿˇÊ ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ Æw-Æ{-wÆwÆ ∑§Ê ¬Íflʸã„U ◊¥ ∑§Êÿ¸÷Ê⁄U ª˝„UáÊ ∑§⁄U
Á‹ÿÊ ªÿÊ „ÒU.
„USÃÊ./-
‚Áøfl.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
[ ÷ʪ v
624
∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ ◊ÈÅÿ ÁŸflʸøŸ ¬ŒÊÁœ∑§Ê⁄UË, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U
‡ÊÊSòÊË øÊÒ∑§, ¬È⁄UÊŸÊU ◊¢òÊÊ‹ÿ ¬Á⁄U‚⁄U, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U
⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ wx ¡ÍŸ wÆv}
»§Ê.∑˝§-v}/Æx/ÁŸflʸøŸ ÿÊÁø∑§Ê/wÆv}/v~y~.ó÷Ê⁄Uà ÁŸflʸøŸ •Êÿʪ, Ÿß¸ ÁŒÀ‹Ë mÊ⁄UÊ ¡Ê⁄UË •Áœ‚ÍøŸÊ ‚¢ÅÿÊ }w/¿U.ª.-‹Ê.‚./
(vz/wÆvy)/wÆv} ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ vw ¡ÍŸ, wÆv} ‹Ê∑§ ¬˝ÁÃÁŸÁœàfl •ÁœÁŸÿ◊, v~zv (v~zv ∑§Ê yx) ∑§Ë œÊ⁄UÊ vÆ{(∑§) ∑§ •ŸÈ‚⁄UáÊ ◊¥ ÁŸflʸøŸ
•Êÿʪ ∞ÃŒ˜ÔmÊ⁄UÊ ÁŸflʸøŸ •¡Ë¸ ‚¢ÅÿÊ-vz/wÆvy ◊¥ ÁŒ∞ ª∞ ©UìÊ ãÿÊÿÊ‹ÿ, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U ∑§ ÃÊ⁄UËπ wÆ •¬˝Ò‹, wÆv} ∑§ •ÊŒ‡Ê ∑§Ê
⁄UÊÖÿ ∑§ ‡ÊÊ‚∑§Ëÿ ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ ◊¥ ‚fl¸‚ÊœÊ⁄UáÊ ∑§Ë ¡ÊŸ∑§Ê⁄UË „UÃÈ ¬˝∑§ÊÁ‡Êà Á∑§ÿÊ ¡ÊÃÊ „ÒU.
(‚È’˝Ã ‚Ê„ÍU)
◊ÈÅÿ ÁŸflʸøŸ ¬ŒÊÁœ∑§Ê⁄UË.
÷Ê⁄Uà ÁŸflʸøŸ •Êÿʪ
ÁŸflʸøŸ ‚ŒŸ, •‡ÊÊ∑§ ⁄UÊ«U, Ÿß¸ ÁŒÀ‹Ë-vvÆÆÆv
Ÿß¸ ÁŒÀ‹Ë, ÃÊ⁄UËπ vw ¡ÍŸ, wÆv}óww íÿDU, v~yÆ (‡Ê∑§)
‚¢. }w/¿U.ª.-‹Ê.‚./(vz/wÆvy)/wÆv}.ó‹Ê∑§ ¬˝ÁÃÁŸÁœàfl •ÁœÁŸÿ◊, v~zv (v~zv ∑§Ê yx) ∑§Ë œÊ⁄UÊ vÆ{ (∑§) ∑§ •ŸÈ‚⁄UáÊ
◊¥, ÁŸflʸøŸ •Êÿʪ ∞ÃŒ˜ÔmÊ⁄UÊ ÁŸflʸøŸ •¡Ë¸ ‚¢. vz/wÆvy ◊¥ ÁŒÿ ªÿ ©UìÊ ãÿÊÿÊ‹ÿ, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U, Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U ∑§ ÃÊ⁄UËπ wÆ •¬˝Ò‹, wÆv} ∑§
•ÊŒ‡Ê ∑§Ê ¬˝∑§ÊÁ‡Êà ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
EP. No. 15 of 2014
PETITIONER
:
Shambhu Prasad Sharma S/o Late Bansh Gopal Sharma Aged About 70 Years R/o
Village And Post-Seoni, Tah. Marwahi, Civil & Revenue Distt. Bilaspur C.G.
Chhattisgarh.
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS :
1.
Dr. Banshilal Mahto S/o Late Dhaniram Mahto Aged about 73 Years R/o House
No. 31, Ward No. 7, Champa Road, Main Road, Korba, Civil & Revenue Distt.
Korba Chhattisgarh.
2.
Charan Das Mahant S/o Bisahu Das Mahant Aged About 59 Years R/o House No.
623, Mahant Para, Post-Saragaon, Tah. Champa, Distt. Janjgir-Champa
Chhattisgarh.
3.
Heera Singh Markam S/o Late Dev Sai Markam Aged about 79 Years R/o Village
& Post-Tiwrata, Tah. Pali, Civil & Revenue Distt. Korba Chhattisgarh.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
÷ʪ v ]
625
4.
Jeevan lal Rautel S/o Bisauha Ram Rautel Aged about 48 Years R/o House No.
224, Kolanpara, Village-Danauli, Post-Korja, Tah. Pendra Road, Distt. Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh.
5.
Amar Nath Pandey S/o Late Brajraj Pandey Aged About 48 Years R/o H.I.G. 128,
M.P. Nagar, Korba Distt. Korba Chhattisgarh.
6.
Dhan Singh Dhurve S/o Sri Rangaee Dhurve Aged About 43 Years R/o Navgaee,
Post-Raghunath Nagar, Tah. Wadrafnagar, Surguja Division, Distt. Balrampur
C.G., Pin-497225, Chhattisgarh.
7.
Pratap Bhanu S/o Gulab Singh Aged About 45 Years R/o Village & Post-
Semardarri, Tah. & Post-Marwahi, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
8.
Charan Bhaiyya S/o Ramcharan Aged about 45 Years R/o Girari, Post-Nawagaon,
Tah. Pendra Road, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
9.
Jata Shankar Pandey S/o Jagdamba Aged About 38 Years R/o Salwa, Post-Ghutra,
P.S. Manendragarh, Distt. Koria C.G., District : Koriya (Baikunthpur),
Chhattisgarh.
10.
S. R. Anchal S/o Late Mungeliha Das Aged about 44 Years R/o Dr. Ambedkar
Chowk, House No. 632, Ward No. 39, Ayodhyapuri, Post-Ntpc Jamnipali, P.S.
Darri, Distt.-Korba Chhattisgarh.
11.
Chandra Bhuwan Pratap Singh Kanwar S/o Mool Chand Kanwar Aged about 36
Years R/o Jambahar, Post. Balco Nagar, Civil & Revenue Distt. Korba,
Chhattisgarh.
12.
Laxman Lal Kaiwarty S/o Birbal Aged About 44 Years R/o Purani Basti, Darri
Post.-Jamnipali, Tah. Katghora, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh.
13.
Phuleshwar Prasad Surjaeeha S/o Shambhunath Surjaeeha Aged about 71 Years
R/o Dhinouchi, Post-Siwni, Tah. Marwahi, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
14.
Rajesh Kumar Pandey S/o Bharat Kumar Pandey Aged About 42 Years R/o Old
Kashinagar Khapra Bhattha, Budhwari Bazar, Korba, House No. 1106, Ward No.
16, Korba, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh.
15.
Dr. Urmila Singh Marko D/o Rai Singh Marko Aged About 49 Years R/o Behind
Secl Colony, Bandhwapara, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
16.
Harbhajan Singh Shyam S/o Sumer Singh Aged About 33 Years R/o House
No. L/101 Chief House Bartunga, Post.-Chirmiri, Tah. Khadgawan, Pin-497449,
District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh.
17.
Rajendra Singh Kanwar S/o Late Jai Singh Kanwar Aged About 32 Years R/o
House No. 563/1/3 Padhimar Balco Nagar, Distt. Korba Chhattisgarh.
18.
Mohan Lal Bargahi S/o Ramadhin Bargahi Aged About 60 Years R/o Ward No.
09, South Jhagrakhand, Tah. Manendragarh, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur),
Chhattisgarh.
19.
Fatte Singh Shyam S/o Jarman Singh Aged About 55 Years R/o Dhinouchi, Post-
Siwni, Tah. Marwahi, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
20.
Kewal Goswami S/o Bishnu Bharti Aged About 44 Years R/o Kurma, Post-Dogri,
Tah. Balauda, Distt. Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.
21.
Sheikh Faoof S/o Sheikh Chand Aged About 46 Years R/o Ward No. 2, Haldibadi,
Chirmiri, District : Koriya (Baikunthput), Chhattisgarh.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
[ ÷ʪ v
626
22.
Rajesh Kumar Mahant S/o Daroga Das Mahant Aged about 37 Years R/o House
No. 63, Belakachhar, Village-Panchayat Condro, Post Balco Nagar, Tah. & Distt.
Korba, Chhattisgarh.
23.
Kamaldev S/o Ram Pratap Bangali Aged About 35 Years Dafaee, Heeragir Dafaee,
Haldibadi, Post-Haldibadi, P.S. Chirmiri, Tah. Khadgavan, Pin-497451, Dis-
trict: Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh.
— Respondents
For the Petitioner
:
In person.
For Respondent No. 1
:
Mr. R. S. Marhas, Advocate.
For Respondent No. 2
:
Mr. V. C. Ottalwar, Advocate
Hon’ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
CAV Judgment/Order
Reserved on 21.02.2018
Pronounced on 20.04.2018
1.
The present election petition touches upon the Parliamentary election held in the year 2014 for Korba
constituency No. 4 Korba wherein respondent No. 1 Banshilal Mahto was declared elected as returned
candidate. In such election respondent No. 1 who contested on behalf of Bhartiya Janta Party had secured
439002 number of votes and the petitioner who contested as an independent candidate has secured 1808
number of votes and the other repsondents secured different number of votes.
2.
(i)
The challenge to the election of respondent No. 1 is on the ground that respondent no. 1 the
returned candidate has not followed the mandatory direction/instructions issued by the chief Elec-
tion Commissioner, Chhattisgarh and the affidavit in the required format was not submitted in the
office of returning officer by all the respondents including the returned candidate (R-1). It is fur-
ther case of the petitioner that the information was required to be submitted u/s 8 of the Represen-
tation of the People Act 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act of 1951”) by all the candidates
who participated in the election but the respondents failed to file such papers before the election
commission and therefore, the nomination of the election itself was void ab-initio. It is further case
of the petitioner that the contesting candidates of the parliamentary election had to file
nomination forms by 05-04-2014, which was the date prescribed for filing nominations in the
office of Election commissioner, korba along-with affidavit. It was stated that the scrutiny of nomi-
nations was fixed for 07-04-2014 and the election was held on 24-4-2014. The counting of ballot
papers was done on 16-05-2014 and the result was also declared on the same date.
(ii)
It was pleaded that the petitioner filed nomination form along-with affidavit in prescribed pro-
forma as per the direction of the Commission, but respondent no. 1 and other contesting respon-
dents have not submitted the affidavits as required u/s 8 of the Representation of People’s Act
1951. The further case of the petitioner is on the ground that the direction of the Commission was
required to be followed as a statutory mandate, however, the petitioner noticed that none of the
respondents have submitted the affidavit and the information as required u/s 8 of the Act of 1951.
Therefore, when the petitioner after noticing the deficiency in nomination papers of the other
contenting candidates filed his objection before the returning officer, Korba and filed his affidavit,
the same was ignored and the returning officer dismissed the objection by holding that the affidavit
so enclosed by the returned candidate was in proper format. It is the case of the petitioner that the
returned candidate primarily respondent No. 1 had filed the wrong nomination paper which was
accepted by the returning officer and the same ought to have been dismissed in the initial stage
when the objection was raised. Therefore, the election of returned candidate on such ground may
be declared void.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
÷ʪ v ]
627
3.
The pleading of the election petition would show that the averments are being made against other respon-
dents also who contested the election. However, during the course of trial, the petitioner did not much press
upon such averments except the averments made against respondent No. 1 who is returned candidate,
therefore, primarily while adjudicating the election petition, the court is concerned only with the nature of
pleading and proof which is brought on record by the petitioner against respondent No. 1 whose election is
sought to be set aside, The further allegation of the petitioner is that in the earlier election of 2009 the
petitioner secured 23136 votes, however, in subsequent election it was reduced to 1808 for the reason that
he was not provided any security and the transparency in the election process was absent, therefore, the
election is also liable to be cancelled.
4.
In the return, respondent No. 1 denied all the allegations and nothing was admitted. It is contended in reply
that as per sub-section (3) of section 81 of the Representation of People’s Act 1951 since the election
petition was not accompanied by as many copies thereof as per the number of respondents mentioned in the
petition and copies are not attested by the petitioner under his own signature to be a true copy of the
petition, therefore, the petition is defectively filed.
5.
It was further pleaded that the objection filed by the petitioner before the returning officer was rightly
rejected as Section 8 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 prescribed for disqualification of a candidate
only on conviction of candidates for certain offences and the objection did not contain any allegation of
election petitioner that the respondent was convicted. It was further stated that the affidavit along-with
nomination papers was properly sworn by the respondent and the scrutiny of proposal was also not disputed
as the oath and affirmation was taken by the respondent in accordance with law. All the adverse allegations
made in the petition were also denied.
6.
on the basis of pleadings and averments made in the petition, the court has framed the following issues;
S. No.
Issues
Findings
01.
Whether copy of the election petition served
Not Proved
to respondent No. 1 is attested by the peti-
tioner under his own signature and whether
the petition has been signed and verified by
the election petitioner ? it not, the effect ?
02.
Whether the respondents have not submitted
Not Proved
the affidavit and information under Section 8
of the Representation of the People Act, 1951
before the Returning Officer ? If not, the
effect ?
03.
Whether the order Annexure P-2 rejecting
No
objection filed by the election petitioner is
wrong, illegal and void ?”
04.
Whether the returning officer acted illegally
No
in not rejecting the nomination papers of the
respondents ?
05.
Whether the election is liable to be quashed
No
and whether the election petitioner is
entitled to be declared as returned candidate?”
7.
The petitioner examined himself before the Court and except this examination, no other evidence was
adduced. On behalf of the respondent, returned candidate Dr. Bansilal Mahto was examined and Lakhanlal
Dewangan was also examined on his behalf as D.W. 2.
8.
Issues 2, 3& 4 are interlinked with each other as they are arising out of common facts and evidence as such
these issues are being decided together. On behalf of the petitioner written submission have been filed and
he did not appear on different dates so fixed for arguments. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
[ ÷ʪ v
628
respondents, submits that the petitioner has not adduced any evidence to prove his case as such no case in
made out in the election petition so as to declare the election of respondent No. 1 as void and except this, no
submission has been made.
9.
In order to find out the fact whether the election petitioner was able to prove his case beyond the reasonable
doubt, the pleadings and evidence were examined. In the statement of the petitioner Shambhu Prasad Sharma,
he has stated that on 07-04-2014 when the scrutiny was fixed before the returning officer, korba, he had filed
an objection that except the petitioner, no other candidate has filed the nomination forms according to the
proforma set out by the election commission. It is stated that since the nomination papers should be filed
according to the direction of the Election Commission, the entire candidatures of the nomination papers of
other candidates should have been rejected. There is no admission of any document by the respondent, The
petitioner has not exhibited or proved any document except the oral evidence. The petitioner has not called
for any witness to prove the fact which nomination papers were filed by the returned candidate. If the
petitioner was serious about the same to prove such facts, he could have called for the evidence of the
returning officer to prove the document. Along-with the petition, bunch of photocopies of the documents
have been placed, but the documents have not been exhibited and proved in evidence by calling the
originals. The returned candidate in his reply has not admitted those documents and instead he has stated
that they have filed the affidavit as per the requirement of law. Therefore, if the petitioner was certain of the
fact that the nomination papers were not supported by duly sworn affidavit then in order to prove the same,
the documents should have been called and proved before the Court when the documentary evidence exists.
Only on mere say of the petitioner that the affidavit was not executed as per the direction and legally
acceptable procedure, it cannot be taken to be a gospel truth for want of any evidence to accept the averments
of the petitioner. The petitioner himself has failed to prove the nature of the documents which were filed by
respondent No. 1 along-with affidavit when the nomination papers were filed.
10.
As against the statement of the petitioner, respondent No. 1 who has examined himself has deposed that
when he wants to file the nomination paper before the returning officer, Korba, he filled it before him and at
the same time all the requisite documents were filed, He has stated that along-with documents, he has also
filed the property papers. He has further stated that he had filled all the necessary forms and fulfilled the
formalities and thereafter, the returning officer scrutinized the nomination form wherein no defect was
found and having found that no defact exists, allowed him to contest the election. The respondent has
further stated that it is wrong to assert that he has not filled the document as per the proforma of 6-1-98. He
has further stated that his proposer Lakhan Lal Dewangan has also signed the nomination papers and admitted
the fact that instead of full signature of Lakhan Lal Dewangan, he has signed as Lakhan Lal. It is further
stated that the said proposer Lakhan Lal Dewangan is M.L.A., of Katghora constituency and he was elected
prior to the election of the witness i.e., respondent No. 1.
11.
In the cross examination of the petitioner, when he was subsequently asked as to why the copy of document
i.e., format of 6.1.1998 has not been attached to the petition, it was replied by him that he had filed his
objection before the returning officer and has stated about the objection in it. further when it was confronted
that the returning officer has dismissed his plea holding that all the documents were in proper format, no reply
was given instead it was stated that the returning officer was shown the format. Therefore, what is the format,
where it exists was upon the petitioner to prove. Neither any such documents were summoned through proper
authority nor any iota of evidence is on record to hold the form of affidavit sworn by the respondent was bad.
12.
In the evidence of returned candidate, respondent No. 1, he stated that in his nomination form of election,
the proposer Lakhan Lal Dewangan has signed the proposal form wherein he has made his signature as
Lakhan Lal. The witness D.W. 2 Lakhan Lal Dewangan affirming the fact has stated that in the year 2014 he
has signed as proposer of the nomination form of the returned candidate Bansilal Mahto and he has signed
as Lakhan Lal in such paper.
13.
The over all scrutiny of file would show that no documentary evidence is placed and exhibited by the
petitioner in this case. The entire case is contested only on the presumption and oral evidence. The nature of
pleadings and evidence would show that the petitioner has failed to appreciate that when he has come to the
Court by filing election petition, it was his duty to satisfy the Court and discharge the burden of proof to
substantiate the averments of the petition. Neither the copy of Annexure P-2 which was filed along-with the
petition has been proved by the Original nor the Certified copy was called to prove the fact. Simply by
placing a document, presumption cannot be drawn that it was the order dated 07-04-2014 passed by the
returning officer whereby the objection of the petitioner was dismissed. What is the authority of the order and
evidentiary value of it still remains mystery. To conclude, it is held that the petitioner was under duty to prove
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
÷ʪ v ]
629
the fact that Annexure P-2 is result of objection made by the petitioner. The pleadings and the evidence are
as vague as it could be and the petitioner has completely failed to discharge his burden of pleading and proof
in the instant election petition.
14.
In a case law reported in (1999) 1 SCC 666 - L. R. Shivarama Gowda vs. T. M. Chandrashekhar (para 10)
Their Lordship of the Supreme Court have laid down the law that in order to declare an election to be void
under Section 100 (1)(d)(iv), it is absolutely necessary for the election petitioner to plead that the result of
the election so far as it relates to returned candidate has been materially affected by the alleged non-
compliance with the provisions of the Act or of the rules. Now reverting the election petition, it would go to
show that the specific pleading is absent about the fact that the election result has been materially affected
for non-compliance of any rules or the provision. In the case in hand since the court is examining the
allegation of election petition as against the will of the people, therefore, the necessary pleading to this
effect has to be there in the election petition to hold that there is a violation of specific rules or direction
issued by the Election Commission coupled with the fact that the result of the election of the returned
candidate has been materially affected by the alleged non-compliance.
15.
The Supreme court in case of Jeet Mohinder Singh vs. Harminder Singh Jassi (1999) 9 SCC 386 in para
40 held that “the success of a candidate who has won at an election should not be lightly interfered with.
Any petition seeking such interference must strictly conform to the requirements of the law. The Court
further held that setting aside of an election involves serious consequences not only for the returned candidate
and the constitutency, but also for the public at large inasmuch as re-election involves an enormous load on
the public funds and administration. Therefore, the inference is strict pleading of facts has to be followed by
proof of facts.
16.
In view of the pleadings and evidence, the court has no hesitation that the election petitioner has miserably
failed to prove the pleadings and averments made by him. Neither any document has been exhibited which
was attacted with the petition by calling the original nor any officers were called to prove the same. There-
fore, the photocopies of the documents attached with the petition remain as not proved. Consequently, no
cognizance can be taken in this election petition about the existence of such document.
17.
In the result, it is held that the petitioner has not been able to prove that the returning candidate has failed to
give information as per section 8 of the R.P. Act 1951 nor is able to prove that the rejection of the objection
raised by the returning officer was illegal and void. Further, the petitioner has been failed to prove that the
returning officer acted illegally in not rejecting the nomination papers of the respondent thereby the peti-
tioner has failed to prove issue nos. 2, 3 & 4.
18.
With respect to issue no. 1 the said issue was primarily made on the pleading of the returned candidate that
the petitioner had not served the petition under his signature and was not properly verified by him. In this
respect, if the evidence of respondent No. 1 is seen it appears that the respondent was not serious to prove
such fact and only superfluous statement has been made, therefore, only on the basis of averment in
absence of any direct proof thereof the returned candidate has failed to discharge his burden as was raised
by him which was framed under issue No. 1.
19.
Therefore, on over all scrutiny of the entire pleadings and evidence, this court is of the opinion that the
election petitioner has failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, the petition cannot
be allowed or entertained only on presumption of facts and oral evidence in the result, the petition has no
merit and is dismissed. No order as to costs.
Sd/-
GOUTAM BHADURI
JUDGE
•ÊŒ‡Ê ‚,
„USÃÊ./-
(Ÿ⁄‘Uãº˝ ŸÊ. ’È≈UÊÁ‹ÿÊ)
¬˝äÊÊŸ ‚Áøfl,
÷Ê⁄Uà ÁŸflʸøŸ •Êÿʪ.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
[ ÷ʪ v
630
ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi-110001
New Delhi, dated 12th June, 2018—22 Jyaistha, 1940 (Saka)
No. 82/CG-HP/(15/2014)/2018.—In pursuance of Section 106 (a) of the Representation of the People Act,
1951 (43 of 1951), the Election Commission hereby publishes Order dated the 20th April, 2018 of the High Court of
Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, in Election Petition No. 15 of 2014.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
EP. No. 15 of 2014
PETITIONER
:
Shambhu Prasad Sharma S/o Late Bansh Gopal Sharma Aged About 70 Years R/o
Village And Post-Seoni, Tah. Marwahi, Civil & Revenue Distt. Bilaspur C.G.
Chhattisgarh.
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS :
1.
Dr. Banshilal Mahto S/o Late Dhaniram Mahto Aged about 73 Years R/o House
No. 31, Ward No. 7, Champa Road, Main Road, Korba, Civil & Revenue Distt.
Korba Chhattisgarh.
2.
Charan Das Mahant S/o Bisahu Das Mahant Aged About 59 Years R/o House No.
623, Mahant Para, Post-Saragaon, Tah. Champa, Distt. Janjgir-Champa
Chhattisgarh.
3.
Heera Singh Markam S/o Late Dev Sai Markam Aged about 79 Years R/o Village
& Post-Tiwrata, Tah. Pali, Civil & Revenue Distt. Korba Chhattisgarh.
4.
Jeevan lal Rautel S/o Bisauha Ram Rautel Aged about 48 Years R/o House No.
224, Kolanpara, Village-Danauli, Post-Korja, Tah. Pendra Road, Distt. Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh.
5.
Amar Nath Pandey S/o Late Brajraj Pandey Aged About 48 Years R/o H.I.G. 128,
M.P. Nagar, Korba Distt. Korba Chhattisgarh.
6.
Dhan Singh Dhurve S/o Sri Rangaee Dhurve Aged About 43 Years R/o Navgaee,
Post-Raghunath Nagar, Tah. Wadrafnagar, Surguja Division, Distt. Balrampur
C.G., Pin-497225, Chhattisgarh.
7.
Pratap Bhanu S/o Gulab Singh Aged About 45 Years R/o Village & Post-
Semardarri, Tah. & Post-Marwahi, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
8.
Charan Bhaiyya S/o Ramcharan Aged about 45 Years R/o Girari, Post-Nawagaon,
Tah. Pendra Road, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
9.
Jata Shankar Pandey S/o Jagdamba Aged About 38 Years R/o Salwa, Post-Ghutra,
P.S. Manendragarh, Distt. Koria C.G., District : Koriya (Baikunthpur),
Chhattisgarh.
10.
S. R. Anchal S/o Late Mungeliha Das Aged about 44 Years R/o Dr. Ambedkar
Chowk, House No. 632, Ward No. 39, Ayodhyapuri, Post-Ntpc Jamnipali, P.S.
Darri, Distt.-Korba Chhattisgarh.
11.
Chandra Bhuwan Pratap Singh Kanwar S/o Mool Chand Kanwar Aged about 36
Years R/o Jambahar, Post. Balco Nagar, Civil & Revenue Distt. Korba,
Chhattisgarh.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
÷ʪ v ]
631
12.
Laxman Lal Kaiwarty S/o Birbal Aged About 44 Years R/o Purani Basti, Darri
Post.-Jamnipali, Tah. Katghora, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh.
13.
Phuleshwar Prasad Surjaeeha S/o Shambhunath Surjaeeha Aged about 71 Years
R/o Dhinouchi, Post-Siwni, Tah. Marwahi, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
14.
Rajesh Kumar Pandey S/o Bharat Kumar Pandey Aged About 42 Years R/o Old
Kashinagar Khapra Bhattha, Budhwari Bazar, Korba, House No. 1106, Ward No.
16, Korba, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh.
15.
Dr. Urmila Singh Marko D/o Rai Singh Marko Aged About 49 Years R/o Behind
Secl Colony, Bandhwapara, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
16.
Harbhajan Singh Shyam S/o Sumer Singh Aged About 33 Years R/o House
No. L/101 Chief House Bartunga, Post.-Chirmiri, Tah. Khadgawan, Pin-497449,
District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh.
17.
Rajendra Singh Kanwar S/o Late Jai Singh Kanwar Aged About 32 Years R/o
House No. 563/1/3 Padhimar Balco Nagar, Distt. Korba Chhattisgarh.
18.
Mohan Lal Bargahi S/o Ramadhin Bargahi Aged About 60 Years R/o Ward No.
09, South Jhagrakhand, Tah. Manendragarh, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur),
Chhattisgarh.
19.
Fatte Singh Shyam S/o Jarman Singh Aged About 55 Years R/o Dhinouchi, Post-
Siwni, Tah. Marwahi, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
20.
Kewal Goswami S/o Bishnu Bharti Aged About 44 Years R/o Kurma, Post-Dogri,
Tah. Balauda, Distt. Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.
21.
Sheikh Faoof S/o Sheikh Chand Aged About 46 Years R/o Ward No. 2, Haldibadi,
Chirmiri, District : Koriya (Baikunthput), Chhattisgarh.
22.
Rajesh Kumar Mahant S/o Daroga Das Mahant Aged about 37 Years R/o House
No. 63, Belakachhar, Village-Panchayat Condro, Post Balco Nagar, Tah. & Distt.
Korba, Chhattisgarh.
23.
Kamaldev S/o Ram Pratap Bangali Aged About 35 Years Dafaee, Heeragir Dafaee,
Haldibadi, Post-Haldibadi, P.S. Chirmiri, Tah. Khadgavan, Pin-497451, Dis-
trict: Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh.
— Respondents
For the Petitioner
:
In person.
For Respondent No. 1
:
Mr. R. S. Marhas, Advocate.
For Respondent No. 2
:
Mr. V. C. Ottalwar, Advocate
Hon’ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
CAV Judgment/Order
Reserved on 21.02.2018
Pronounced on 20.04.2018
1.
The present election petition touches upon the Parliamentary election held in the year 2014 for Korba
constituency No. 4 Korba wherein respondent No. 1 Banshilal Mahto was declared elected as returned
candidate. In such election respondent No. 1 who contested on behalf of Bhartiya Janta Party had secured
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
[ ÷ʪ v
632
439002 number of votes and the petitioner who contested as an independent candidate has secured 1808
number of votes and the other repsondents secured different number of votes.
2.
(i)
The challenge to the election of respondent No. 1 is on the ground that respondent no. 1 the
returned candidate has not followed the mandatory direction/instructions issued by the chief
Election Commissioner, Chhattisgarh and the affidavit in the required format was not submitted in
the office of returning officer by all the respondents including the returned candidate (R-1). It is
further case of the petitioner that the information was required to be submitted u/s 8 of the Repre-
sentation of the People Act 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act of 1951”) by all the candidates
who participated in the election but the respondents failed to file such papers before the election
commission and therefore, the nomination of the election itself was void ab-initio. It is further case
of the petitioner that the contesting candidates of the parliamentary election had to file
nomination forms by 05-04-2014, which was the date prescribed for filing nominations in the
office of Election commissioner, korba along-with affidavit. It was stated that the scrutiny of nomi-
nations was fixed for 07-04-2014 and the election was held on 24-4-2014. The counting of ballot
papers was done on 16-05-2014 and the result was also declared on the same date.
(ii)
It was pleaded that the petitioner filed nomination form along-with affidavit in prescribed pro-
forma as per the direction of the Commission, but respondent no. 1 and other contesting respon-
dents have not submitted the affidavits as required u/s 8 of the Representation of People’s Act
1951. The further case of the petitioner is on the ground that the direction of the Commission was
required to be followed as a statutory mandate, however, the petitioner noticed that none of the
respondents have submitted the affidavit and the information as required u/s 8 of the Act of 1951.
Therefore, when the petitioner after noticing the deficiency in nomination papers of the other
contenting candidates filed his objection before the returning officer, Korba and filed his affidavit,
the same was ignored and the returning officer dismissed the objection by holding that the affidavit
so enclosed by the returned candidate was in proper format. It is the case of the petitioner that the
returned candidate primarily respondent No. 1 had filed the wrong nomination paper which was
accepted by the returning officer and the same ought to have been dismissed in the initial stage
when the objection was raised. Therefore, the election of returned candidate on such ground may
be declared void.
3.
The pleading of the election petition would show that the averments are being made against other respon-
dents also who contested the election. However, during the course of trial, the petitioner did not much press
upon such averments except the averments made against respondent No. 1 who is returned candidate,
therefore, primarily while adjudicating the election petition, the court is concerned only with the nature of
pleading and proof which is brought on record by the petitioner against respondent No. 1 whose election is
sought to be set aside, The further allegation of the petitioner is that in the earlier election of 2009 the
petitioner secured 23136 votes, however, in subsequent election it was reduced to 1808 for the reason that
he was not provided any security and the transparency in the election process was absent, therefore, the
election is also liable to be cancelled.
4.
In the return, respondent No. 1 denied all the allegations and nothing was admitted. It is contended in reply
that as per sub-section (3) of section 81 of the Representation of People’s Act 1951 since the election
petition was not accompanied by as many copies thereof as per the number of respondents mentioned in the
petition and copies are not attested by the petitioner under his own signature to be a true copy of the
petition, therefore, the petition is defectively filed.
5.
It was further pleaded that the objection filed by the petitioner before the returning officer was rightly
rejected as Section 8 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 prescribed for disqualification of a candidate
only on conviction of candidates for certain offences and the objection did not contain any allegation of
election petitioner that the respondent was convicted. It was further stated that the affidavit along-with
nomination papers was properly sworn by the respondent and the scrutiny of proposal was also not disputed
as the oath and affirmation was taken by the respondent in accordance with law. All the adverse allegations
made in the petition were also denied.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
÷ʪ v ]
633
6.
on the basis of pleadings and averments made in the petition, the court has framed the following issues;
S. No.
Issues
Findings
01.
Whether copy of the election petition served
Not Proved
to respondent No. 1 is attested by the peti-
tioner under his own signature and whether
the petition has been signed and verified by
the election petitioner ? it not, the effect ?
02.
Whether the respondents have not submitted
Not Proved
the affidavit and information under Section 8
of the Representation of the People Act, 1951
before the Returning Officer ? If not, the
effect ?
03.
Whether the order Annexure P-2 rejecting
No
objection filed by the election petitioner is
wrong, illegal and void ?”
04.
Whether the returning officer acted illegally
No
in not rejecting the nomination papers of the
respondents ?
05.
Whether the election is liable to be quashed
No
and whether the election petitioner is
entitled to be declared as returned candidate?”
7.
The petitioner examined himself before the Court and except this examination, no other evidence was
adduced. On behalf of the respondent, returned candidate Dr. Bansilal Mahto was examined and Lakhanlal
Dewangan was also examined on his behalf as D.W. 2.
8.
Issues 2, 3& 4 are interlinked with each other as they are arising out of common facts and evidence as such
these issues are being decided together. On behalf of the petitioner written submission have been filed and
he did not appear on different dates so fixed for arguments. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
respondents, submits that the petitioner has not adduced any evidence to prove his case as such no case in
made out in the election petition so as to declare the election of respondent No. 1 as void and except this, no
submission has been made.
9.
In order to find out the fact whether the election petitioner was able to prove his case beyond the reasonable
doubt, the pleadings and evidence were examined. In the statement of the petitioner Shambhu Prasad Sharma,
he has stated that on 07-04-2014 when the scrutiny was fixed before the returning officer, korba, he had filed
an objection that except the petitioner, no other candidate has filed the nomination forms according to the
proforma set out by the election commission. It is stated that since the nomination papers should be filed
according to the direction of the Election Commission, the entire candidatures of the nomination papers of
other candidates should have been rejected. There is no admission of any document by the respondent, The
petitioner has not exhibited or proved any document except the oral evidence. The petitioner has not called
for any witness to prove the fact which nomination papers were filed by the returned candidate. If the
petitioner was serious about the same to prove such facts, he could have called for the evidence of the
returning officer to prove the document. Along-with the petition, bunch of photocopies of the documents
have been placed, but the documents have not been exhibited and proved in evidence by calling the
originals. The returned candidate in his reply has not admitted those documents and instead he has stated
that they have filed the affidavit as per the requirement of law. Therefore, if the petitioner was certain of the
fact that the nomination papers were not supported by duly sworn affidavit then in order to prove the same,
the documents should have been called and proved before the Court when the documentary evidence exists.
Only on mere say of the petitioner that the affidavit was not executed as per the direction and legally
acceptable procedure, it cannot be taken to be a gospel truth for want of any evidence to accept the averments
of the petitioner. The petitioner himself has failed to prove the nature of the documents which were filed by
respondent No. 1 along-with affidavit when the nomination papers were filed.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
[ ÷ʪ v
634
10.
As against the statement of the petitioner, respondent No. 1 who has examined himself has deposed that
when he wants to file the nomination paper before the returning officer, Korba, he filled it before him and at
the same time all the requisite documents were filed, He has stated that along-with documents, he has also
filed the property papers. He has further stated that he had filled all the necessary forms and fulfilled the
formalities and thereafter, the returning officer scrutinized the nomination form wherein no defect was
found and having found that no defact exists, allowed him to contest the election. The respondent has
further stated that it is wrong to assert that he has not filled the document as per the proforma of 6-1-98. He
has further stated that his proposer Lakhan Lal Dewangan has also signed the nomination papers and admitted
the fact that instead of full signature of Lakhan Lal Dewangan, he has signed as Lakhan Lal. It is further
stated that the said proposer Lakhan Lal Dewangan is M.L.A., of Katghora constituency and he was elected
prior to the election of the witness i.e., respondent No. 1.
11.
In the cross examination of the petitioner, when he was subsequently asked as to why the copy of document
i.e., format of 6.1.1998 has not been attached to the petition, it was replied by him that he had filed his
objection before the returning officer and has stated about the objection in it. further when it was confronted
that the returning officer has dismissed his plea holding that all the documents were in proper format, no reply
was given instead it was stated that the returning officer was shown the format. Therefore, what is the format,
where it exists was upon the petitioner to prove. Neither any such documents were summoned through proper
authority nor any iota of evidence is on record to hold the form of affidavit sworn by the respondent was bad.
12.
In the evidence of returned candidate, respondent No. 1, he stated that in his nomination form of election,
the proposer Lakhan Lal Dewangan has signed the proposal form wherein he has made his signature as
Lakhan Lal. The witness D.W. 2 Lakhan Lal Dewangan affirming the fact has stated that in the year 2014 he
has signed as proposer of the nomination form of the returned candidate Bansilal Mahto and he has signed
as Lakhan Lal in such paper.
13.
The over all scrutiny of file would show that no documentary evidence is placed and exhibited by the
petitioner in this case. The entire case is contested only on the presumption and oral evidence. The nature of
pleadings and evidence would show that the petitioner has failed to appreciate that when he has come to the
Court by filing election petition, it was his duty to satisfy the Court and discharge the burden of proof to
substantiate the averments of the petition. Neither the copy of Annexure P-2 which was filed along-with the
petition has been proved by the Original nor the Certified copy was called to prove the fact. Simply by
placing a document, presumption cannot be drawn that it was the order dated 07-04-2014 passed by the
returning officer whereby the objection of the petitioner was dismissed. What is the authority of the order and
evidentiary value of it still remains mystery. To conclude, it is held that the petitioner was under duty to prove
the fact that Annexure P-2 is result of objection made by the petitioner. The pleadings and the evidence are
as vague as it could be and the petitioner has completely failed to discharge his burden of pleading and proof
in the instant election petition.
14.
In a case law reported in (1999) 1 SCC 666 - L. R. Shivarama Gowda vs. T. M. Chandrashekhar (para 10)
Their Lordship of the Supreme Court have laid down the law that in order to declare an election to be void
under Section 100 (1)(d)(iv), it is absolutely necessary for the election petitioner to plead that the result of
the election so far as it relates to returned candidate has been materially affected by the alleged non-
compliance with the provisions of the Act or of the rules. Now reverting the election petition, it would go to
show that the specific pleading is absent about the fact that the election result has been materially affected
for non-compliance of any rules or the provision. In the case in hand since the court is examining the
allegation of election petition as against the will of the people, therefore, the necessary pleading to this
effect has to be there in the election petition to hold that there is a violation of specific rules or direction
issued by the Election Commission coupled with the fact that the result of the election of the returned
candidate has been materially affected by the alleged non-compliance.
15.
The Supreme court in case of Jeet Mohinder Singh vs. Harminder Singh Jassi (1999) 9 SCC 386 in para
40 held that “the success of a candidate who has won at an election should not be lightly interfered with.
Any petition seeking such interference must strictly conform to the requirements of the law. The Court
further held that setting aside of an election involves serious consequences not only for the returned candidate
and the constitutency, but also for the public at large inasmuch as re-election involves an enormous load on
the public funds and administration. Therefore, the inference is strict pleading of facts has to be followed by
proof of facts.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ wy ¡È‹Ê߸U wÆwÆ
÷ʪ v ]
635
16.
In view of the pleadings and evidence, the court has no hesitation that the election petitioner has miserably
failed to prove the pleadings and averments made by him. Neither any document has been exhibited which
was attacted with the petition by calling the original nor any officers were called to prove the same. There-
fore, the photocopies of the documents attached with the petition remain as not proved. Consequently, no
cognizance can be taken in this election petition about the existence of such document.
17.
In the result, it is held that the petitioner has not been able to prove that the returning candidate has failed to
give information as per section 8 of the R.P. Act 1951 nor is able to prove that the rejection of the objection
raised by the returning officer was illegal and void. Further, the petitioner has been failed to prove that the
returning officer acted illegally in not rejecting the nomination papers of the respondent thereby the peti-
tioner has failed to prove issue nos. 2, 3 & 4.
18.
With respect to issue no. 1 the said issue was primarily made on the pleading of the returned candidate that
the petitioner had not served the petition under his signature and was not properly verified by him. In this
respect, if the evidence of respondent No. 1 is seen it appears that the respondent was not serious to prove
such fact and only superfluous statement has been made, therefore, only on the basis of averment in
absence of any direct proof thereof the returned candidate has failed to discharge his burden as was raised
by him which was framed under issue No. 1.
19.
Therefore, on over all scrutiny of the entire pleadings and evidence, this court is of the opinion that the
election petitioner has failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, the petition cannot
be allowed or entertained only on presumption of facts and oral evidence in the result, the petition has no
merit and is dismissed. No order as to costs.
Sd/-
GOUTAM BHADURI
JUDGE
By order,
Sd/-
(NARENDRA N. BUTOLIA)
Principal Secretary,
Election Commission of India.