¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwv
÷ʪ v ]
119
∑˝§◊Ê¢∑§ z ]
⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, ‡ÊÈ∑˝§flÊ⁄U, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwvó◊ÊÉÊ ~, ‡Ê∑§ v~yw
÷ʪ 1
⁄UÊíÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∑§ •ÊŒ‡Ê
‚Ê◊Êãÿ ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ Áfl÷ʪ
◊¢òÊÊ‹ÿ, ◊„UÊŸŒË ÷flŸ, ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄
ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ vv Ÿflê’⁄UU wÆwÆ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ ߸U v-Æw/wÆwÆ/∞∑§-w.ó⁄UÊíÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∞ÃŒ˜mÊ⁄UÊ üÊË ªÊÁfl¥Œ⁄UÊ◊ øÈ⁄‘Uãº˝, ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (wÆÆx), •ÊÿÈÄÃ, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U ‚¥÷ʪ, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U ∑§Ê
©UŸ∑§ flø◊ÊŸ ∑§Ã¸√ÿÊ¥ ∑§ ‚ÊÕ-‚ÊÕ •ÊÿÈÄÃ, ’SÃ⁄U ‚¥÷ʪ, ¡ªŒ‹¬È⁄U ∑§Ê •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚ÊÒ¥¬ÃÊ „ÒU.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ∑§ ⁄UÊíÿ¬Ê‹ ∑§ ŸÊ◊ ‚ ÃÕÊ •ÊŒ‡ÊÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U,
∑§◊‹¬˝Ëà Á‚¥„U, ‚Áøfl.
‚¢øÊ‹∑§, ◊Ⱥ˝áÊ ÃÕÊ ‹πŸ ‚Ê◊ª˝Ë, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U mÊ⁄UÊ ‡ÊÊ‚∑§Ëÿ ˇÊòÊËÿ ◊Ⱥ˝áÊÊ‹ÿ, ⁄UÊ¡ŸÊ¢ŒªÊ¢fl ‚ ◊ÈÁº˝Ã ÃÕÊ ¬˝∑§ÊÁ‡ÊÃówÆwv.
¬¢¡ËÿŸ ∑˝§◊Ê¢∑§
“¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U/ŒÈª¸/Æ~/wÆvx-wÆvz.”
“Á’¡Ÿ‚ ¬ÊS≈U ∑§ •ãê¸Ã «UÊ∑§
‡ÊÈÀ∑§ ∑§ ŸªŒ ÷ȪÃÊŸ (Á’ŸÊ «UÊ∑§
Á≈U∑§≈U) ∑§ ¬˝·áÊ „UÃÈ •ŸÈ◊Ã. ∑˝§◊Ê¢∑§
¡Ë. w-ww-¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ª¡≈U/x} Á‚.
‚. Á÷‹Ê߸, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ xÆ-z-wÆÆv.”
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ
¬˝ÊÁœ∑§Ê⁄U ‚ ¬˝∑§ÊÁ‡ÊÃ
Áfl·ÿó‚ÍøË
÷ʪ v.ó(v) ⁄UÊÖÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∑§ •ÊŒ‡Ê, (w) Áfl÷ʪ ¬˝◊ÈπÊ¥ ∑§ •ÊŒ‡Ê,
(x) ©Uëø ãÿÊÿÊ‹ÿ ∑§ •ÊŒ‡Ê •ÊÒ⁄U •Áœ‚ÍøŸÊ∞¢, (y)
⁄UÊÖÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∑§ ‚¢∑§À¬, (z) ÷Ê⁄Uà ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∑§ •ÊŒ‡Ê •ÊÒ⁄U
•Áœ‚ÍøŸÊ∞¢, ({) ÁŸflʸøŸ •Êÿʪ, ÷Ê⁄Uà ∑§Ë •Áœ‚ÍøŸÊ∞¢,
(|) ‹Ê∑§-÷Ê·Ê ¬Á⁄UÁ‡ÊCÔU.
÷ʪ w.óSÕÊŸËÿ ÁŸ∑§Êÿ ∑§Ë •Áœ‚ÍøŸÊ∞¢.
÷ʪ x.ó(v) ÁflôÊʬŸ •ÊÒ⁄U ÁflÁflœ ‚ÍøŸÊ∞¢, (w) ‚Ê¢ÁÅÿ∑§Ëÿ
‚ÍøŸÊ∞¢.
÷ʪ y.ó(∑§) (v) ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U Áflœÿ∑§, (w) ¬˝fl⁄U ‚Á◊Áà ∑§
¬˝ÁÃflŒŸ, (x) ‚¢‚Œ ◊¥ ¬È⁄U—SÕÊÁ¬Ã Áflœÿ∑§, (π) (v)
•äÿÊŒ‡Ê, (w) ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U •ÁœÁŸÿ◊, (x) ‚¢‚Œ˜Ô ∑§
•ÁœÁŸÿ◊, (ª) (v) ¬˝ÊM§¬ ÁŸÿ◊, (w) •¢ÁÃ◊ ÁŸÿ◊.
vv~
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwv
[ ÷ʪ v
120
flŸ Áfl÷ʪ
◊¢òÊÊ‹ÿ, ◊„UÊŸŒË ÷flŸ, ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄
ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ } ÁŒ‚ê’⁄U wÆwÆ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ ∞»§ v-Æv/wÆwÆ/vÆ-÷Ê.fl.‚.ó⁄UÊíÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∞ÃŒ˜mÊ⁄UÊ ÁŸêŸÁ‹Áπà ÷Ê⁄UÃËÿ flŸ ‚flÊ •ÁäÊ∑§ÊÁ⁄UÿÊ¥ ∑§Ê ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚ÁŸ∑§ ŒÎÁCU∑§ÊáÊ
‚ ©UŸ∑§ ŸÊ◊ ∑§ ‚◊ˇÊ Œ‡Êʸ∞ ª∞ ∑§ÊÚ‹◊ ∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§-y •ŸÈ‚Ê⁄U ŸflËŸ ¬ŒSÕʬŸÊ ¬Œ ¬⁄U •SÕÊ߸U M§¬ ‚ •ʪÊ◊Ë •ÊŒ‡Ê ¬ÿ¸ãà ¬ŒSÕ ∑§⁄UÃÊ
„ÒU —ó
∑˝§.
•ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË ∑§Ê ŸÊ◊
flø◊ÊŸ ¬ŒSÕʬŸÊ
ŸflËŸ ¬ŒSÕʬŸÊ
(v)
(w)
(x)
(y)
v.
üÊË◊ÃË ‚¥¡ËÃÊ ªÈåÃÊ
◊ÈÅÿ flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§, ∑§Êÿ¸ •ÊÿÊ¡ŸÊ,
◊ÈÅÿ flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§ (‚Ã./Á‡Ê∑§Ê.) ∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ ¬˝äÊÊŸ
(v~~|)
⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U flÎûÊ, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U.
◊ÈÅÿ flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§, •⁄Uáÿ ÷flŸ, ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U
•≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U.
w.
üÊË •◊⁄UŸÊÕ ¬˝‚ÊŒ
◊ÈÅÿ flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§ (÷Í-¬˝’¥äÊ) ∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ
¿U.ª. ⁄UÊíÿ ‹ÉÊÈ flŸÊ¬¡ ‚¥ÉÊ, ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U •≈U‹
(v~~})
¬˝äÊÊŸ ◊ÈÅÿ flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§, •⁄Uáÿ ÷flŸ,
Ÿª⁄U ∑§Ê ‚flÊ∞¥ ¬˝ÁÃÁŸÿÈÁÄà ‚ÊÒ¥¬Ë ¡ÊÃË „ÒU.
ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U.
x.
üÊË •ÁŸ‹ ‚ÊŸË (wÆÆÆ)
◊ÈÅÿ flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§, Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U flÎûÊ,
◊ÈÅÿ flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§ (flãÿ¬˝ÊáÊË) ∞fl¥ ˇÊòÊ ‚¥øÊ‹∑§,
Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U.
•øÊŸ∑§◊Ê⁄U ≈UÊ߸Uª⁄U Á⁄U¡fl¸, Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U.
y.
üÊË ⁄UÊ¡‡Ê ¬Êá«Uÿ (wÆÆÆ)
flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§, ∑§Êÿ¸ •ÊÿÊ¡ŸÊ flŸ◊á«U‹,
¬˝÷Ê⁄UË ◊ÈÅÿ flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§ (flãÿ¬˝ÊáÊË) ∞fl¥ ˇÊòÊ
⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U.
‚¥øÊ‹∑§, ©UŒ¥ÃË-‚ËÃÊŸŒË ≈UÊ߸Uª⁄U Á⁄U¡fl¸, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U.
z.
«UÊÚ. ‚Ê◊Ê ŒÊ‚ (wÆÆw)
ˇÊòÊËÿ ◊„Uʬ˝’¥äÊ∑§, ¿U.ª. ⁄UÊíÿ flŸ
flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§, ∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ ¬˝äÊÊŸ ◊ÈÅÿ flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§,
Áfl∑§Ê‚ ÁŸª◊ Á‹., ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U •≈U‹
•⁄Uáÿ ÷flŸ, ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U.
Ÿª⁄U.
{.
üÊË »È§‹¡¥‚ ≈UÊå¬Ê
flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§, ∑§Êÿ¸ •ÊÿÊ¡ŸÊ, ‚⁄UªÈ¡Ê
flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§, „UÊÕË Á⁄U¡fl¸, ‚⁄UªÈ¡Ê.
(wÆÆw)
flÎûÊ •¥Á’∑§Ê¬È⁄U.
|.
üÊË ∞‚. ∞‚. ∑¥§fl⁄U
flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§, „UÊÕË Á⁄U¡fl¸, ‚⁄UªÈ¡Ê.
∑§Êÿ¸∑§Ê⁄ËU ‚¥øÊ‹∑§, ¿U.ª. ⁄UÊíÿ flŸ Áfl∑§Ê‚ ÁŸª◊
(wÆÆw)
Á‹., ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U.
}.
üÊË ŸÊflŒ ‡ÊȡʩUŒ˜ŒËŸ
flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§, ∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ ¬˝äÊÊŸ ◊ÈÅÿ flŸ
¬˝÷Ê⁄UË ◊ÈÅÿ flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§, Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U flÎûÊ, Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U.
(wÆÆy)
‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§, •⁄Uáÿ ÷flŸ, ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U
•≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U.
~.
üÊË ⁄UÊ¡Í •ªÊÁ‚◊ŸË
¬˝÷Ê⁄UË flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§, flŸ ¬˝’¥äÊŸ ∞fl¥
¬˝÷Ê⁄UË ˇÊòÊËÿ ◊„Uʬ˝’¥äÊ∑§, ¿U.ª. ⁄UÊíÿ flŸ Áfl∑§Ê‚
(wÆÆ{)
‚ÍøŸÊ ¬˝áÊÊ‹Ë flŸ◊á«U‹, ∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ
ÁŸª◊ Á‹., ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U.
¬˝äÊÊŸ ◊ÈÅÿ flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§, •⁄Uáÿ ÷flŸ
ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U.
vÆ.
üÊË Áfl‡fl‡Ê ∑ȧ◊Ê⁄U
©U¬ ◊ÈÅÿ ∑§Êÿ¸¬Ê‹Ÿ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË (∑Ò§ê¬Ê)
flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U flŸ◊á«U‹, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U.
(wÆÆ|)
∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ ¬˝äÊÊŸ ◊ÈÅÿ flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§,
•⁄Uáÿ ÷flŸ, ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwv
÷ʪ v ]
121
(v)
(w)
(x)
(y)
vv.
üÊË ∑ΧcáÊ⁄UÊ◊ ’…∏U߸U
flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ŒÈª¸ flŸ◊á«U‹, ŒÈª¸.
flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ’‹ÊҌʒʡÊ⁄U flŸ◊á«U‹,
(wÆÆ|)
’‹ÊҌʒʡÊ⁄U.
vw.
üÊË ◊ŸÊ¡ ∑ȧ◊Ê⁄U ¬Êá«Uÿ
flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ⁄UÊÿª…∏U flŸ◊á«U‹,
¬˝÷Ê⁄UË flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§, ∑§Êÿ¸ •ÊÿÊ¡ŸÊ flŸ◊á«U‹,
(wÆÆ|)
⁄UÊÿª…∏U.
Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U.
vx.
üÊË •Ê‹Ê∑§ ∑ȧ◊Ê⁄U ÁÃflÊ⁄UË
flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ’‹ÊҌʒʡÊ⁄U
©U¬ flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§, ∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ ¬˝äÊÊŸ ◊ÈÅÿ flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§,
(wÆÆ|)
flŸ◊á«U‹, ’‹ÊҌʒʡÊ⁄U.
•⁄Uáÿ ÷flŸ ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U.
vy.
üÊË ⁄UÊ◊ •flÃÊ⁄U ŒÈ’
flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, πÒ⁄Uʪ…∏U flŸ◊á«U‹,
flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ◊È¥ª‹Ë flŸ◊á«U‹, ◊È¥ª‹Ë.
(wÆÆ|)
πÒ⁄Uʪ…∏U.
vz.
üÊË ’Ë. ∞‚. ∆UÊ∑ȧ⁄U
flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U flŸ◊á«U‹,
flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ∑§‡Ê∑§Ê‹ flŸ◊á«U‹, ∑§‡Ê∑§Ê‹.
(wÆÆ|)
⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U.
v{.
üÊË •Ê⁄U. ‚Ë. ŒÈǪÊ
flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ◊È¥ª‹Ë flŸ◊á«U‹,
¬˝÷Ê⁄UË •¬⁄U ◊ÈÅÿ ∑§Êÿ¸¬Ê‹Ÿ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ¿U.ª. ⁄UÊíÿ
(wÆÆ|)
◊È¥ª‹Ë.
flŸÊÒ·ÁäÊ ¬ÊŒ¬ ’Ê«¸U, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U.
v|.
üÊË •Á◊ÃÊ÷ ’Ê¡¬ÿË
flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, äÊ◊Ã⁄UË flŸ◊á«U‹,
©U¬ ◊ÈÅÿ ∑§Êÿ¸¬Ê‹Ÿ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË (∑Ò§ê¬Ê) ∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ
(wÆÆ|)
äÊ◊Ã⁄UË.
¬˝äÊÊŸ ◊ÈÅÿ flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§, •⁄Uáÿ ÷flŸ, ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U
•≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U.
v}.
üÊË◊ÃË ‚ÃÊÁfl‡ÊÊ ‚◊Ê¡ŒÊ⁄U
flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ’ʋʌ flŸ◊á«U‹,
flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, äÊ◊Ã⁄UË flŸ◊á«U‹, äÊ◊Ã⁄UË.
(wÆvÆ)
’ʋʌ.
v~.
üÊË◊ÃË Áfl¡ÿÊ ÁflŸÊŒ ∑ȧ⁄¸U
©U¬ ‚¥øÊ‹∑§, •øÊŸ∑§◊Ê⁄U ≈UÊÿª⁄U
‚¥øÊ‹∑§, ∑§Ê¥ª⁄U ÉÊÊ≈UË ⁄UÊC˛UËÿ ©UlÊŸ, ¡ªŒ‹¬È⁄U.
(wÆvv)
Á⁄U¡fl¸, ‹Ê⁄U◊Ë.
wÆ.
üÊË ¬˝áÊÿ Á◊üÊÊ (wÆvx)
©U¬ flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§, ∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ ¬˝äÊÊŸ ◊ÈÅÿ
flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ⁄UÊÿª…∏U flŸ◊á«U‹, ⁄UÊÿª…∏U.
flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§, •⁄Uáÿ ÷flŸ, ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U
•≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U.
wv.
üÊË ªáÊflË⁄U äÊê◊‡ÊË‹
flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ∑§‡Ê∑§Ê‹ flŸ◊á«U‹,
flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ŒÈª¸ flŸ◊á«U‹, ŒÈª¸.
(wÆvx)
∑§‡Ê∑§Ê‹.
ww.
üÊË ¬¥∑§¡ ⁄UÊ¡¬Íà (wÆvy)
©U¬ flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§, ¿U.ª. ⁄UÊíÿ ¡Òfl
flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ◊„UÊ‚◊È¥Œ flŸ◊á«U‹, ◊„UÊ‚◊È¥Œ.
ÁflÁfläÊÃÊ ’Ê«¸U, ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U.
wx.
üÊË ◊ÿ¥∑§ ¬Êá«Uÿ
flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ◊„UÊ‚◊È¥Œ flŸ◊á«U‹,
flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ’ʋʌ flŸ◊á«U‹, ’ʋʌ.
(÷Ê.fl.‚.)
◊„UÊ‚◊È¥Œ.
wy.
üÊË üÊËÁŸflÊ‚ ÃãŸ≈UË
©U¬ flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§ (flãÿ¬˝ÊáÊË) ∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ
©U¬ flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§, ∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ ¬˝äÊÊŸ ◊ÈÅÿ flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§,
(÷Ê.fl.‚.)
¬˝äÊÊŸ ◊ÈÅÿ flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§ (flãÿ¬˝ÊáÊË),
•⁄Uáÿ ÷flŸ ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U.
•⁄Uáÿ ÷flŸ, ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U.
wz.
üÊË ‚àÿŒfl ‡Ê◊ʸ
flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, •ŸÈ‚¥äÊÊŸ ∞fl¥ ÁflSÃÊ⁄U
©U¬ ‚¥øÊ‹∑§, •øÊŸ∑§◊Ê⁄U ≈UÊ߸Uª⁄U Á⁄U¡fl¸, ‹Ê⁄U◊Ë.
(÷Ê.fl.‚.)
flŸ◊á«U‹, Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwv
[ ÷ʪ v
122
(v)
(w)
(x)
(y)
w{.
üÊË ‚¥¡ÿ ÿÊŒfl
©U¬ flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§, ¿U.ª. ⁄UÊíÿ flŸÊÒ·ÁäÊ
flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, πÒ⁄Uʪ…∏U flŸ◊á«U‹, πÒ⁄Uʪ…∏U.
(÷Ê.fl.‚.)
¬ÊŒ¬ ’Ê«¸U, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U.
w|.
üÊË •‡ÊÊ∑§ ∑ȧ◊Ê⁄U ¬≈U‹
‚¥øÊ‹∑§, ∑§Ê¥ª⁄U ÉÊÊ≈UË ⁄UÊC˛UËÿ ©UlÊŸ,
flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ’ˡʬÈ⁄U flŸ◊á«U‹, ’ˡʬÈ⁄U.
(÷Ê.fl.‚.)
¡ªŒ‹¬È⁄U.
w}.
üÊË Á¡Ããº˝ ∑ȧ◊Ê⁄U ©U¬ÊäÿÊÿ
©U¬ flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§, ¿U.ª. ⁄UÊíÿ flŸ Áfl∑§Ê‚
flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, •ŸÈ‚¥äÊÊŸ ∞fl¥ ÁflSÃÊ⁄U
(÷Ê.fl.‚.)
ÁŸª◊ Á‹., ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U.
flŸ◊á«U‹, Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U.
w~.
üÊË ¡ÊäÊfl ‚ʪ⁄U ⁄UÊ◊øãº˝
¬˝Á‡ÊˇÊÈ ©U¬ flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ŒÊ⁄UŸÊ¬Ê‹
‚¥÷ʪËÿ ¬˝’¥äÊ∑§, ¿U.ª. ⁄UÊíÿ flŸ Áfl∑§Ê‚ ÁŸª◊
(wÆv|)
flŸ◊á«U‹ ‚È∑§◊Ê.
Á‹., ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U.
xÆ.
üÊË flM§áÊ ¡ÒŸ (wÆv|)
¬˝Á‡ÊˇÊÈ ©U¬ flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, »§⁄U‚ªÊ¥fl
©U¬ flŸ ‚¥⁄UˇÊ∑§, flŸ ¬˝’¥äÊŸ ‚ÍøŸÊ ¬˝áÊÊ‹Ë
flŸ◊á«U‹ ∑§‡Ê∑§Ê‹.
flŸ◊á«U‹, •⁄Uáÿ ÷flŸ, ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U.
xv.
üÊË ‚ÊÒ⁄U÷ Á‚¥„U ∆UÊ∑ȧ⁄U
¬˝Á‡ÊˇÊÈ ©U¬ flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ⁄UÊ¡ŸÊ¥ŒªÊ¥fl
flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, •ŸÈ‚¥äÊÊŸ ∞fl¥ ÁflSÃÊ⁄U
(wÆv|)
flŸ◊á«U‹, ⁄UÊ¡ŸÊ¥ŒªÊ¥fl.
flŸ◊á«U‹, ¡ªŒ‹¬È⁄U.
xw.
üÊË ‡ÊÁ‡ÊªÊŸãŒŸ ∑§.
¬˝Á‡ÊˇÊÈ ©U¬ flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, Œfl÷ʪ
‚¥÷ʪËÿ ¬˝’¥äÊ∑§, ¿U.ª. ⁄UÊíÿ flŸ Áfl∑§Ê‚ ÁŸª◊
(wÆv|)
flŸ◊á«U‹ ªÁ⁄UÿÊ’¥Œ.
Á‹., ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U.
xx.
üÊË •Á÷·∑§ ¡ÊªÊflÃ
¬˝Á‡ÊˇÊÈ ©U¬ flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ∑ȧŸ∑ȧ⁄UË
‚¥÷ʪËÿ ¬˝’¥äÊ∑§, ¿U.ª. ⁄UÊíÿ flŸ Áfl∑§Ê‚ ÁŸª◊
(wÆv|)
flŸ◊á«U‹, ¡‡Ê¬È⁄U.
Á‹., ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U.
xy.
üÊË ∞Ÿ.•Ê⁄U. πÈ¥≈U
©U¬ flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ¬Á‡ø◊ ∑§Êá«Uʪʥfl
¬˝÷Ê⁄UË flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ŸÊ⁄UÊÿáʬÈ⁄U flŸ◊á«U‹,
(‚.fl.‚¥.)
flŸ◊á«U‹ ŒÁˇÊáÊ ∑§Êá«Uʪʥfl.
ŸÊ⁄UÊÿáʬÈ⁄U.
xz.
üÊË «UË.∑§. ◊„U⁄U
©U¬ flŸ◊á«U‹ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË, ‚Ê◊ÊÁ¡∑§ flÊÁŸ∑§Ë
¬˝÷Ê⁄UË ©U¬ ‚¥øÊ‹∑§, ߥUº˝ÊflÃË ≈UÊ߸Uª⁄U Á⁄U¡fl¸,
(‚.fl.‚¥.)
flŸ◊á«U‹, ¡ªŒ‹¬È⁄U.
’ˡʬÈ⁄U.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ∑§ ⁄UÊíÿ¬Ê‹ ∑§ ŸÊ◊ ‚ ÃÕÊ •ÊŒ‡ÊÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U,
∑§. ∞‹. øÊÒ„UÊŸ, ‚¥ÿÈÄà ‚Áøfl.
•ÊflÊ‚ ∞fl¥ ¬ÿʸfl⁄UáÊ Áfl÷ʪ
◊¢òÊÊ‹ÿ, ◊„UÊŸŒËU ÷flŸ, ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄
ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ vv ÁŒ‚ê’⁄U wÆwÆ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ ∞»§ v-vw/wÆv~/xw.ó¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ, ‚Ê◊Êãÿ ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∑§ •ÊŒ‡Ê ∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ ߸U-v-Æw/wÆwÆ/∞∑§-w ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ xÆ-vv-
wÆwÆ mÊ⁄UÊ üÊË ‚È’˝Ã ‚Ê„ÍU ÷Ê.¬˝.‚. (v~~w), •¬⁄U ◊ÈÅÿ ‚Áøfl ∑§Ê •ÊflÊ‚ ∞fl¥ ¬ÿʸfl⁄UáÊ Áfl÷ʪ ∞fl¥ •äÿˇÊ, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ¬ÿʸfl⁄UáÊ ‚¥⁄UˇÊáÊ
◊¥«U‹ ∑§Ê •ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ¬˝÷Ê⁄U ‚ÊÒ¥¬Ê ªÿÊ „ÒU.
w.
‚Ê◊Êãÿ ¬˝‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ Áfl÷ʪ ∑§ ©U¬⁄UÊÄà •ÊŒ‡Ê ∑§ ¬Á⁄U¬ˇÿ ◊¥ üÊË ‚È’˝Ã ‚Ê„ÍU, •¬⁄U ◊ÈÅÿ ‚Áøfl, •ÊflÊ‚ ∞fl¥ ¬ÿʸfl⁄UáÊ Áfl÷ʪ ∑§Ê
∑§Êÿ¸÷Ê⁄U ª˝„UáÊ ∑§⁄UŸ ∑§ ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ ‚ •äÿˇÊ, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ¬ÿʸfl⁄UáÊ ‚¥⁄UˇÊáÊ ◊¥«U‹ ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ Á∑§ÿÊ ¡ÊÃÊ „ÒU.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ∑§ ⁄UÊíÿ¬Ê‹ ∑§ ŸÊ◊ ‚ ÃÕÊ •ÊŒ‡ÊÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U,
‚Ë. ÁÃ∑§Ë¸, ©U¬-‚Áøfl.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwv
÷ʪ v ]
123
⁄UÊ¡Sfl Áfl÷ʪ
∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ, ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê ∑§Ê⁄U’Ê, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ∞fl¢ ¬ŒŸ ©U¬-‚Áøfl, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ, ⁄UÊ¡Sfl ∞fl¥ •ʬŒÊ
¬˝’¥äÊŸ Áfl÷ʪ
∑§Ê⁄U’Ê, ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ vw Ÿflê’⁄U wÆwÆ
¬˝ÊM§¬-∞∑§
(ÁŸÿ◊ vv ŒÁπÿ)
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§/vzÆ|{/÷Í-•¡¸Ÿ/wÆwÆ.ó÷ÍÁ◊-•¡¸Ÿ, ¬ÈŸflʸ‚Ÿ ∞fl¥ ¬ÈŸ√ÿ¸flSÕʬŸ ◊¥ ©UÁøÃ ¬˝ÁÃ∑§⁄U ÃÕÊ ¬Ê⁄UŒÁ‡Ê¸ÃÊ ∑§Ê •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄U
•ÁäÊÁŸÿ◊, wÆvx ∑§Ë äÊÊ⁄UÊ y ‚„U¬Á∆Uà ÁŸÿ◊ | ∑§ •¥Ãª¸Ã ŸËø •ŸÈ‚ÍøË ◊¥ ©UÀ‹Áπà ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§Ê •¡¸Ÿ ‹Ê∑§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ „UÃÈ ⁄UÊíÿ ‚⁄U∑§Ê⁄U mÊ⁄UÊ
•ʇÊÁÿà „ÒU, •ÕʸØ —ó
Á¡‹Ê
ÄU‚Ë‹
ª˝Ê◊/Ÿª⁄U
ˇÊòÊ»§‹
‹Ê∑§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ ∑§Ê Áflfl⁄UáÊ
(v)
(w)
(x)
(y)
(z)
∑§Ê⁄U’Ê
¬Ê¥«∏Ë ©U¬⁄UÊ«∏Ê
ªÈ⁄UÁ‚¥ÿÊ
v.}vx „UÄ≈ÿ⁄U
ªÈ⁄UÁ‚¥ÿÊ-‚Á‹„UÊ÷Ê¥∆UÊ ¬„È¥Uø ◊ʪ¸ ◊¥ •Áäʪ˝Á„Uà ÷ÍÁ◊ ◊¥
‚«∏∑§ ∑§ ÁŸ◊ʸáÊ „UÃÈ.
©U¬⁄UÊÄà ©UÀ‹Áπà ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§ •¡¸Ÿ „UÃÈ ‚Ê◊ÊÁ¡∑§ ‚◊ÊÉÊÊà ÁŸäÊʸ⁄UáÊ ∑§ •äÿÿŸ „UÃÈ ¡Ÿ ‚ÈŸflÊ߸U ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ vy-vw-wÆwÆ ∑§Ê ‚◊ÿ
vw.ÆÆ ’¡ ‚ SÕÊŸ ª˝Ê◊ ¬¥øÊÿà ÷flŸ, ªÈ⁄UÁ‚¥ÿÊ ◊¥ ÁŸÿà ∑§Ë ªß¸U „ÒU. ¬˝SÃÊÁflà ÷ÍÁ◊ •¡¸Ÿ ∑§Ê •ãÿ Áflfl⁄UáÊ ÁŸêŸÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U „ÒU —ó
v.
‹Ê∑§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ ∑§Ê ‚¥ÁˇÊåà Áflfl⁄UáÊ
ó
ªÈ⁄UÁ‚¥ÿÊ-‚Á‹„UÊ÷Ê¥∆UÊ ¬„È¥Uø ◊ʪ¸ ¬⁄U ¬Ä∑§Ë ‚«∏∑§
ÁŸ◊ʸáÊ ∑§ Á‹ÿ •Á¡¸Ã „UÊŸ ¬⁄U.
w.
¬˝àÿˇÊ M§¬ ‚ ¬˝÷ÊÁflà ¬Á⁄UflÊ⁄UÊ¥ ∑§Ë ‚¥ÅÿÊ
ó
v} ¬Á⁄UflÊ⁄U
x.
•¬˝àÿˇÊ M§¬ ‚ ¬˝÷ÊÁflà ¬Á⁄UflÊ⁄UÊ¥ ∑§Ë ‚¥ÅÿÊ
ó
v} ¬Á⁄UflÊ⁄U
y.
¬˝÷ÊÁflà ˇÊòÊ ◊¥ ÁŸ¡Ë ◊∑§ÊŸÊ¥ ÃÕÊ •ãÿ ¬Á⁄U‚ê¬ÁûÊÿÊ¥ó
ÁŸ⁄¥U∑§
∑§Ë •ŸÈ◊ÊÁŸÃ ‚¥ÅÿÊ.
z.
¬˝÷ÊÁflà ˇÊòÊÊ¥ ◊¥ ‡ÊÊ‚∑§Ëÿ ◊∑§ÊŸÊ¥ ÃÕÊ •ãÿ
ó
ÁŸ⁄¥U∑§
¬Á⁄U‚ê¬ÁûÊÿÊ¥ ∑§Ë •ŸÈ◊ÊÁŸÃ ‚¥ÅÿÊ.
{.
ÄÿÊ ¬˝SÃÊÁflà •¡¸Ÿ ãÿÍŸÃ◊ „ÒU ?
ó
„UÊ¥
|.
ÄÿÊ ‚¥÷fl Áfl∑§À¬Ê¥ •ÊÒ⁄U ßU‚∑§Ë ‚ÊäÿÃÊ ¬⁄U ÁfløÊ⁄U
ó
„UÊ¥
∑§⁄U Á‹ÿÊ ªÿÊ „ÒU ?
}.
¬Á⁄UÿÊ¡ŸÊ ∑§Ë ∑ȧ‹ ‹ÊªÃ
ó
L§. ‹Êπ
~.
¬Á⁄UÿÊ¡ŸÊ ‚ „UÊŸ flÊ‹ ‹Ê÷
ó
‚«∏∑§ ∑§ ÁŸ◊ʸáÊ ◊¥ •Á¡¸Ã ∑§Ë ¡ÊŸ flÊ‹Ë ÷ÍÁ◊ ¬Ífl¸ ◊¥
•Á¡¸Ã „UÊ øÈ∑§Ë „ÒU. ‚«∏∑§ ÁŸ◊ʸáÊ ‚ •Êflʪ◊Ÿ ∑§Ë
‚ÈÁfläÊÊ ‚Ȫ◊ „ÈU߸U „ÒU.
vÆ.
¬˝SÃÊÁflà ‚Ê◊ÊÁ¡∑§ ‚◊ÊÉÊÊà ∑§Ë ¬˝ÁìÍÁø ∑§ Á‹ÿ
ó
¬˝SÃÊÁflà ‚Ê◊ÊÁ¡∑§ ‚◊ÊÉÊÊà ∑§Ë ¬˝ÁìÍÁø ∑§ Á‹∞
©U¬Êÿ ÃÕÊ ©U‚ ¬⁄U „UÊŸ flÊ‹Ê ‚¥÷ÊÁflà √ÿÿ.
•ÊflÁŒÃ ‚¥SÕÊ ∑§ mÊ⁄UÊ ‚¥÷ÊÁflà √ÿÿ ∑§Ê ¬˝ÊfläÊÊŸ
Á∑§ÿÊ ªÿÊ „ÒU.
vv.
¬Á⁄UÿÊ¡ŸÊ mÊ⁄UÊ ¬˝÷ÊÁflà „UÊŸ flÊ‹ •ãÿ ÉÊ≈U∑§
ó
ÁŸ⁄¥U∑§
©U¬⁄UÊÄà ÷ÍÁ◊ •¡¸Ÿ ∑§ ‚¥’¥äÊ ◊¥ Á∑§‚Ë √ÿÁÄÃ/‚¥SÕÊ ÿÊ •ãÿ Á∑§‚Ë √ÿÁÄà ∑§Ê ∑§Ê߸U ¡ÊŸ∑§Ê⁄UË/‚ȤÊÊfl ŒŸÊ „UÊ, ÃÊ ÁflÁ„Uà ÁÃÁÕ/‚◊ÿ
∞fl¥ SÕÊŸ ¬⁄U ŒË ¡Ê ‚∑§ªË.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwv
[ ÷ʪ v
124
∑§Ê⁄U’Ê, ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ v| Ÿflê’⁄U wÆwÆ
¬˝ÊM§¬-∞∑§
(ÁŸÿ◊ vv ŒÁπÿ)
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§/vzv|y/÷Í-•¡¸Ÿ/wÆwÆ.ó÷ÍÁ◊-•¡¸Ÿ, ¬ÈŸflʸ‚Ÿ ∞fl¥ ¬ÈŸ√ÿ¸flSÕʬŸ ◊¥ ©UÁøÃ ¬˝ÁÃ∑§⁄U ÃÕÊ ¬Ê⁄UŒÁ‡Ê¸ÃÊ ∑§Ê •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄U
•ÁäÊÁŸÿ◊, wÆvx ∑§Ë äÊÊ⁄UÊ y ‚„U¬Á∆Uà ÁŸÿ◊ | ∑§ •¥Ãª¸Ã ŸËø •ŸÈ‚ÍøË ◊¥ ©UÀ‹Áπà ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§Ê •¡¸Ÿ ‹Ê∑§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ „UÃÈ ⁄UÊíÿ ‚⁄U∑§Ê⁄U mÊ⁄UÊ
•ʇÊÁÿà „ÒU, •ÕʸØ —ó
Á¡‹Ê
ÄU‚Ë‹
ª˝Ê◊/Ÿª⁄U
ˇÊòÊ»§‹
‹Ê∑§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ ∑§Ê Áflfl⁄UáÊ
(v)
(w)
(x)
(y)
(z)
∑§Ê⁄U’Ê
¬Ê¥«∏Ë ©U¬⁄UÊ«∏Ê
Œ◊™§∑ȧá«UÊ
Æ.|zv „UÄ≈ÿ⁄U
ªÈ⁄UÁ‚¥ÿÊ-‚Á‹„UÊ÷Ê¥∆UÊ ¬„È¥Uø ◊ʪ¸ ◊¥ •Áäʪ˝Á„Uà ÷ÍÁ◊ ◊¥
‚«∏∑§ ∑§ ÁŸ◊ʸáÊ „UÃÈ.
©U¬⁄UÊÄà ©UÀ‹Áπà ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§ •¡¸Ÿ „UÃÈ ‚Ê◊ÊÁ¡∑§ ‚◊ÊÉÊÊà ÁŸäÊʸ⁄UáÊ ∑§ •äÿÿŸ „UÃÈ ¡Ÿ ‚ÈŸflÊ߸U ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ wv-vw-wÆwÆ ∑§Ê ‚◊ÿ
vw.ÆÆ ’¡ ‚ SÕÊŸ ª˝Ê◊ ¬¥øÊÿà ÷flŸ ◊ÊÁŸ∑§¬È⁄U ◊¥ ÁŸÿà ∑§Ë ªß¸U „ÒU. ¬˝SÃÊÁflà ÷ÍÁ◊ •¡¸Ÿ ∑§Ê •ãÿ Áflfl⁄UáÊ ÁŸêŸÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U „ÒU —ó
v.
‹Ê∑§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ ∑§Ê ‚¥ÁˇÊåà Áflfl⁄UáÊ
ó
ªÈ⁄UÁ‚¥ÿÊ-‚Á‹„UÊ÷Ê¥∆UÊ ¬„È¥Uø ◊ʪ¸ ¬⁄U ¬Ä∑§Ë ‚«∏∑§
ÁŸ◊ʸáÊ ∑§ Á‹ÿ •Á¡¸Ã „UÊŸ ¬⁄U.
w.
¬˝àÿˇÊ M§¬ ‚ ¬˝÷ÊÁflà ¬Á⁄UflÊ⁄UÊ¥ ∑§Ë ‚¥ÅÿÊ
ó
wx ¬Á⁄UflÊ⁄U
x.
•¬˝àÿˇÊ M§¬ ‚ ¬˝÷ÊÁflà ¬Á⁄UflÊ⁄UÊ¥ ∑§Ë ‚¥ÅÿÊ
ó
wx ¬Á⁄UflÊ⁄U
y.
¬˝÷ÊÁflà ˇÊòÊ ◊¥ ÁŸ¡Ë ◊∑§ÊŸÊ¥ ÃÕÊ •ãÿ ¬Á⁄U‚ê¬ÁûÊÿÊ¥ó
ÁŸ⁄¥U∑§
∑§Ë •ŸÈ◊ÊÁŸÃ ‚¥ÅÿÊ.
z.
¬˝÷ÊÁflà ˇÊòÊÊ¥ ◊¥ ‡ÊÊ‚∑§Ëÿ ◊∑§ÊŸÊ¥ ÃÕÊ •ãÿ
ó
ÁŸ⁄¥U∑§
¬Á⁄U‚ê¬ÁûÊÿÊ¥ ∑§Ë •ŸÈ◊ÊÁŸÃ ‚¥ÅÿÊ.
{.
ÄÿÊ ¬˝SÃÊÁflà •¡¸Ÿ ãÿÍŸÃ◊ „ÒU ?
ó
„UÊ¥
|.
ÄÿÊ ‚¥÷fl Áfl∑§À¬Ê¥ •ÊÒ⁄U ßU‚∑§Ë ‚ÊäÿÃÊ ¬⁄U ÁfløÊ⁄U
ó
„UÊ¥
∑§⁄U Á‹ÿÊ ªÿÊ „ÒU ?
}.
¬Á⁄UÿÊ¡ŸÊ ∑§Ë ∑ȧ‹ ‹ÊªÃ
ó
L§. ‹Êπ
~.
¬Á⁄UÿÊ¡ŸÊ ‚ „UÊŸ flÊ‹ ‹Ê÷
ó
‚«∏∑§ ∑§ ÁŸ◊ʸáÊ ◊¥ •Á¡¸Ã ∑§Ë ¡ÊŸ flÊ‹Ë ÷ÍÁ◊ ¬Ífl¸ ◊¥
•Á¡¸Ã „UÊ øÈ∑§Ë „ÒU. ‚«∏∑§ ÁŸ◊ʸáÊ ‚ •Êflʪ◊Ÿ ∑§Ë
‚ÈÁfläÊÊ ‚Ȫ◊ „ÈU߸U „ÒU.
vÆ.
¬˝SÃÊÁflà ‚Ê◊ÊÁ¡∑§ ‚◊ÊÉÊÊà ∑§Ë ¬˝ÁìÍÁø ∑§ Á‹ÿ
ó
¬˝SÃÊÁflà ‚Ê◊ÊÁ¡∑§ ‚◊ÊÉÊÊà ∑§Ë ¬˝ÁìÍÁø ∑§ Á‹∞
©U¬Êÿ ÃÕÊ ©U‚ ¬⁄U „UÊŸ flÊ‹Ê ‚¥÷ÊÁflà √ÿÿ.
•ÊflÁŒÃ ‚¥SÕÊ ∑§ mÊ⁄UÊ ‚¥÷ÊÁflà √ÿÿ ∑§Ê ¬˝ÊfläÊÊŸ
Á∑§ÿÊ ªÿÊ „ÒU.
vv.
¬Á⁄UÿÊ¡ŸÊ mÊ⁄UÊ ¬˝÷ÊÁflà „UÊŸ flÊ‹ •ãÿ ÉÊ≈U∑§
ó
ÁŸ⁄¥U∑§
©U¬⁄UÊÄà ÷ÍÁ◊ •¡¸Ÿ ∑§ ‚¥’¥äÊ ◊¥ Á∑§‚Ë √ÿÁÄÃ/‚¥SÕÊ ÿÊ •ãÿ Á∑§‚Ë √ÿÁÄà ∑§Ê ∑§Ê߸U ¡ÊŸ∑§Ê⁄UË/‚ȤÊÊfl ŒŸÊ „UÊ, ÃÊ ÁflÁ„Uà ÁÃÁÕ/‚◊ÿ
∞fl¥ SÕÊŸ ¬⁄U ŒË ¡Ê ‚∑§ªË.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ∑§ ⁄UÊíÿ¬Ê‹ ∑§ ŸÊ◊ ‚ ÃÕÊ •ÊŒ‡ÊÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U,
Á∑§⁄UáÊ ∑§Ê҇ʋ, ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U ∞fl¥ ¬ŒŸ ©U¬-‚Áøfl.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwv
÷ʪ v ]
125
∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ, ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê ¡Ê¥¡ªË⁄U-øÊ¥¬Ê (¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U),U ∞fl¢ ¬ŒŸ ©U¬-‚Áøfl, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ, ⁄UÊ¡Sfl
∞fl¥ •ʬŒÊ ¬˝’¥äÊŸ Áfl÷ʪ
¡Ê¥¡ªË⁄U-øÊ¥¬Ê, ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ w~ »§⁄Ufl⁄UË wÆwÆ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§/w~{z/•-}w/wÆv}-v~.óøÍ¢Á∑§ ⁄UÊÖÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∑§Ê ÿ„U ¬˝ÃËà „UÊÃÊ „ÒU Á∑§ ß‚‚ ‚¢‹ÇŸ •ŸÈ‚ÍøË ∑§ πÊŸ (v) ‚ (y) ◊¥
flÁáʸà ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§Ë •ŸÈ‚ÍøË ∑§ πÊŸ ({) ◊¥ ©U‚∑§ ‚Ê◊Ÿ ÁŒÿ ªÿ ‚Êfl¸¡ÁŸ∑§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ ∑§ Á‹ÿ •Êfl‡ÿ∑§ÃÊ „ÒU •ÕflÊ •Êfl‡ÿ∑§ÃÊ ¬«∏UŸ ∑§Ë
‚¢÷ÊflŸÊ „ÒU. •× ÷ÍÁ◊ •¡¸Ÿ, ¬ÈŸflʸ‚Ÿ •ÊÒ⁄U ¬ÈŸ√ÿ¸flSÕʬŸ ◊¥ ©UÁøÃ ¬˝ÁÃ∑§⁄U •ÊÒ⁄U ¬Ê⁄UŒÁ‡Ê¸ÃÊ ∑§Ê •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄U •ÁäÊÁŸÿ◊, wÆvx (Á¡‚ ∞ÃŒ˜
¬‡øÊØ •ÁäÊÁŸÿ◊ wÆvx ∑§„UÊ ¡ÊÿªÊ) ∑§Ë äÊÊ⁄UÊ vv ∑§Ë ©U¬-äÊÊ⁄UÊ (v) ∑§ ©U¬’¥äÊÊ¥ ∑§ •ŸÈ‚Ê⁄U ‚÷Ë ‚¥’¥ÁäÊà √ÿÁQ§ÿÊ¥ ∑§Ê ßU‚∑§ mÊ⁄UÊ ßU‚
•ʇÊÿ ∑§Ë ‚ÍøŸÊ ŒË ¡ÊÃË „ÒU Á∑§ ⁄UÊíÿ ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∞ÃŒ˜mÊ⁄UÊ •ŸÈ‚ÍøË ∑§ πÊŸ (z) ◊¥ ©UÀ‹Áπà ¬˝ÊÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË ∑§Ê ©UÄà ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§ ‚¥’¥äÊ ◊¥ äÊÊ⁄UÊ vw ∑§
•¥Ãª¸Ã ŒË ªÿË ‡ÊÁÄÃÿÊ¥ ∑§Ê ¬˝ÿʪ ∑§⁄UŸ ∑§ Á‹∞ ¬˝ÊÁäÊ∑Χà ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU —ó
•ŸÈ‚ÍøË
÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§Ê fláʸŸ
œÊ⁄UÊ vw ∑§ mÊ⁄UÊ ‚Êfl¸¡ÁŸ∑§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ
Á¡‹Ê
ÄU‚Ë‹
Ÿª⁄U/ª˝Ê◊
‹ª÷ª ˇÊòÊ»§‹
¬˝ÊÁœ∑Χà •Áœ∑§Ê⁄UË
∑§Ê fláʸŸ
(„UÄ≈Uÿ⁄U ◊¥)
(v)
(w)
(x)
(y)
(z)
({)
¡Ê¥¡ªË⁄U-øÊ¥¬Ê
«U÷⁄UÊ
‚Ê⁄UÊ«UË„U/
Æ.w}w
∑§Êÿ¸¬Ê‹Ÿ •Á÷ÿ¥ÃÊ, ¡‹ ‚¥‚ÊäÊŸ
‚Ê⁄UÊ«UË„U ’Ò⁄UÊÚ¡ ∑§
¬.„U.Ÿ¥. w~
‚fl¸ˇÊáÊ ’Ò⁄UÊÚ¡ ÁŸ◊ʸáÊ ‚¥÷ʪ ∑˝§.-v
’Ê¥ÿË Ã≈U •¬˝Êø Á’˝¡
π⁄UÁ‚ÿÊ.
ÁŸ◊ʸáÊ „UÃÈ.
÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§Ê ŸÄ‡ÊÊ (å‹ÊŸ) ∑§Ê ÁŸ⁄UˡÊáÊ •ŸÈÁfl÷ʪËÿ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË (⁄UÊ¡Sfl), «U÷⁄UÊ ∑§ ∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ ◊¥ Á∑§ÿÊ ¡Ê ‚∑§ÃÊ „ÒU.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ∑§ ⁄UÊíÿ¬Ê‹ ∑§ ŸÊ◊ ‚ ÃÕÊ •ÊŒ‡ÊÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U,
¡. ¬Ë. ¬Ê∆U∑§, ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U ∞fl¥ ¬ŒŸ ©U¬-‚Áøfl.
∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ, ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U, Á¡‹Ê ∑§Ê⁄U’Ê, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ∞fl¢
¬ŒŸ ©U¬ ‚Áøfl, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ, ⁄UÊ¡Sfl ∞fl¥
•ʬŒÊ ¬˝’¥äÊŸ Áfl÷ʪ
∑§Ê⁄U’Ê, ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ xv •ªSà wÆwÆ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§/vwy~|/÷Í-•¡¸Ÿ/Æv • }w/wÆv}-v~.óøÍ¢Á∑§ ⁄UÊÖÿ
‡ÊÊ‚Ÿ ∑§Ê ß‚ ’Êà ∑§Ê ‚◊ʜʟ „UÊ ªÿÊ „ÒU Á∑§ ŸËø ŒË ªß¸ •ŸÈ‚ÍøË ∑§
¬Œ (v) ◊¥ flÁáʸà ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§Ë •ŸÈ‚ÍøË ∑§ ¬Œ (w) ◊¥ ©UÀ‹ÁπÃ
‚Êfl¸¡ÁŸ∑§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ ∑§ Á‹∞ •Êfl‡ÿ∑§ÃÊ „ÒU. •× ÷ÍÁ◊ •¡¸Ÿ,
¬ÈŸflʸ‚Ÿ •ÊÒ⁄U ¬ÈŸ√ÿ¸flSÕʬŸ ◊¥ ©UÁøÃ ¬˝ÁÃ∑§⁄U •ÊÒ⁄U ¬Ê⁄UŒÁ‡Ê¸ÃÊ ∑§Ê
•ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄U •ÁœÁŸÿ◊, wÆvx (Á¡‚ ∞ÃŒ˜ ¬‡øÊØ •ÁäÊÁŸÿ◊, wÆvx
∑§„UÊ ¡ÊÿªÊ) ∑§Ë œÊ⁄UÊ v~ ∑§ •ãê¸Ã ß‚∑§ mÊ⁄UÊ ÿ„U ÉÊÊÁ·Ã Á∑§ÿÊ
¡ÊÃÊ „ÒU Á∑§ ©UQ§ ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§Ë ©UQ§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ ∑§ Á‹∞ •Êfl‡ÿ∑§ÃÊ „ÒU —ó
•ŸÈ‚ÍøË
(v) ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§Ê fláʸŸ-
(∑§) Á¡‹Ê-∑§Ê⁄U’Ê
(π) ÄU‚Ë‹-∑§Ê⁄U’Ê
(ª) Ÿª⁄U/ª˝Ê◊-©U⁄UªÊ, ¬.„U.Ÿ¥. v{
(ÉÊ) ‹ª÷ª ˇÊòÊ»§‹-Æ.}xw „UÄ≈ÿ⁄U
π‚⁄UÊ Ÿê’⁄U
⁄U∑§’Ê
(„UÄ≈Uÿ⁄U ◊¥)
(v)
(w)
ywy/y
Æ.Æv{
yw|/v
Æ.Æw}
yw|/w, yw|/x
Æ.Ævw
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwv
[ ÷ʪ v
126
(v)
(w)
yw~/v
Æ.ÆwÆ
yw~/y
Æ.Ævw
yx{/v
Æ.Æv{
yxy, yx{/y
Æ.Æ}z
yxx/w
Æ.ÆÆ}
yxw/vz
Æ.Æww
yxw/~
Æ.Æw}
yxx/x
Æ.ÆÆ}
yxw/{
Æ.ÆwÆ
ww{/v
Æ.Ævy
yxz/vx
Æ.ÆÆ{
yxz/|
Æ.v}z
yxÆ/|
Æ.ÆÆ}
yxÆ/}, yzv/y
Æ.ÆwÆ
yzv/{
Æ.ÆÆ}
yzx/z
Æ.ÆÆ}
yzx/v
Æ.Æwy
yzw/w
Æ.Æv{
(v)
(w)
yw|/{, yw|/|
Æ.Ævw
yxw/}≈U
Æ.Æxw
yxw/v|
Æ.Æw}
yxw/v, yxw/}òÊ
Æ.ÆxÆ
yw|/y
Æ.ÆÆy
yzv/vv
Æ.ÆÆ{
wxx/v
Æ.vzÆ
yxÆ/v
Æ.ÆÆ{
ÿʪ
Æ.}xw
(w) ‚Êfl¸¡ÁŸ∑§ ¬˝ÿÊ¡Ÿ Á¡‚∑§ Á‹∞ •Êfl‡ÿ∑§ÃÊ „ÒU-øÊê¬Ê-ªfl⁄UÊ
⁄‘U‹◊ʪ¸ (©U⁄UªÊ ∑§ ¬Ê‚) ⁄‘UÀfl •Ê√„U⁄U Á’˝¡ ∑§ ¬„ÈU¥ø ◊ʪ¸
ÁŸ◊ʸáÊ „UÃÈ.
(x) ÷ÍÁ◊ ∑§Ê§ŸÄ‡ÊÊ (å‹ÊŸ) ∑§Ê ÁŸ⁄UˡÊáÊ •ŸÈÁfl÷ʪËÿ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË
(⁄UÊ¡Sfl), ∑§Ê⁄U’Ê ∑§ ∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ ◊¥ Á∑§ÿÊ ¡Ê ‚∑§ÃÊ „ÒU.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ∑§ ⁄UÊíÿ¬Ê‹ ∑§ ŸÊ◊ ‚ ÃÕÊ •ÊŒ‡ÊÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U,
Á∑§⁄UáÊ ∑§Ê҇ʋ, ∑§‹Ä≈U⁄U ∞fl¥ ¬ŒŸ ©U¬-‚Áøfl.
Áfl÷ʪ ¬˝◊ÈπÊ¥ ∑§ •ÊŒ‡Ê
‚¥øÊ‹ŸÊ‹ÿ, SÕÊŸËÿ ÁŸÁäÊ ‚¥¬⁄UˡÊÊ
é‹Ê∑§-v, ÁmÃËÿ Ë, ߥUº˝ÊflÃË ÷flŸ, ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U
ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ } ¡Ÿfl⁄UË wÆwv
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§/∞‹.∞»§.∞./¬˝‡ÊÊ./w~w/wÆwÆ/{z.ó¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U SÕÊŸËÿ ÁŸÁäÊ ‚¥¬⁄UˡÊÊ •äÊËŸSÕ ‹πÊ ‚flÊ ¬⁄UˡÊÊ ÁŸÿ◊ v~{v ◊¥ ©UÀ‹ÁπÃ
¬˝ÊfläÊÊŸ •ŸÈ‚Ê⁄U •ÁäÊ‚ÍÁøÃ Á∑§ÿÊ ¡ÊÃÊ „ÒU Á∑§ ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U SÕÊŸËÿ ÁŸÁäÊ ‚¥¬⁄UˡÊÊ •äÊËŸSÕ ‹πÊ ‚flÊ ¬⁄UˡÊÊ ÷ʪ-∞∑§ ∞fl¥ ÷ʪ-ŒÊ ŸËø
Á‹Áπà •ŸÈ‚Ê⁄U ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ v{-Æw-wÆwv ‚ wÆ-Æw-wÆwv Ã∑§ „UÊªË —ó
÷ʪ-∞∑§
∑˝§.
¬˝‡Ÿ ¬òÊ
ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§
ÁŒŸ
Áfl·ÿ
‚◊ÿ
(v)
(w)
(x)
(y)
(z)
({)
v.
¬˝Õ◊
v{-Æw-wÆwv
◊¥ª‹flÊ⁄U
‚¥ˇÊÁ¬∑§Ê ÃÕÊ ¬˝ÊM§¬
x.ÆÆ ÉÊ¥≈U
(¬ÈSÃ∑§ ⁄UÁ„UÃ)
¬˝Ê× vv.ÆÆ ‚ w.ÆÆ ’¡
w.
ÁmÃËÿ
v|-Æw-wÆwv
’ÈäÊflÊ⁄
◊Í‹÷Íà ÁŸÿ◊, Á‚Áfl‹ ‹πÊ
w.xÆ ÉÊ¥≈U
ÁflÁŸÿ◊ ßUàÿÊÁŒ (¬ÈSÃ∑§ ‚UÁ„UÃ)
¬˝Ê× vv.ÆÆ ‚ v.xÆ ’¡
x.
ÃÎÃËÿ
v}-Æw-wÆwv
ªÈM§flÊ⁄U
‹πÊ ¬⁄UˡÊÊ ÃÕÊ ‹πÊ ‚¥Á„UÃÊ∞¥
w.xÆ ÉÊ¥≈U
(¬ÈSÃ∑§ ‚Á„UÃ)
¬˝Ê× vv.ÆÆ ‚ v.xÆ ’¡
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwv
÷ʪ v ]
127
(v)
(w)
(x)
(y)
(z)
({)
y.
øÃÈÕ¸-•
v~-Æw-wÆwv
‡ÊÈ∑˝§flÊ⁄U
‚¥øÊ‹∑§ SÕÊŸËÿ ÁŸÁäÊ ‹πÊ ∑§Ë
v.xÆ ÉÊ¥≈U
‹πÊ ¬⁄UˡÊÊ ÃÕÊ ÁŸ⁄UˡÊáÊ ∑§ •äÊËŸ
¬˝Ê× vv.ÆÆ ‚ vw.xÆ ’¡
‹πʕʥ ∑§Ë ‹πÊ ¬⁄UˡÊÊ ÃÕÊ ÁŸ⁄UˡÊáÊ
„UÃÈ ÁŸÿ◊ ÃÕÊ ÁflÁŸÿ◊ (‚ÒhUÊ¥ÁÃ∑§)
(¬ÈSÃ∑§ ⁄UÁ„UÃ)
z.
øÃÈÕ¸-’
wÆ-Æw-wÆwv
‡ÊÁŸflÊ⁄U
‚¥øÊ‹∑§ SÕÊŸËÿ ÁŸÁäÊ ‹πÊ ∑§Ë
w.xÆ ÉÊ¥≈U
‹πÊ ¬⁄UˡÊÊ ÃÕÊ ÁŸ⁄UˡÊáÊ ∑§ •äÊËŸ
¬˝Ê× vv.ÆÆ ‚ v.xÆ ’¡
‹πʕʥ ∑§Ë ‹πÊ ¬⁄UˡÊÊ ÃÕÊ ÁŸ⁄UˡÊáÊ
„UÃÈ ÁŸÿ◊ ÃÕÊ ÁflÁŸÿ◊ (√ÿÊfl„UÊÁ⁄U∑§)
(¬ÈSÃ∑§ ‚UÁ„UÃ)
÷ʪ-ŒÊ
v.
¬˝Õ◊-•
v{-Æw-wÆwv
◊¥ª‹flÊ⁄U
ÁfläÊÊŸ ◊á«U‹ ∑§ •ÁäÊÁŸÿ◊ ÃÕÊ
v.xÆ ÉÊ¥≈U
‚Ê¥ÁflÁäÊ∑§ ÁŸÿ◊ (‚ÒhUÊ¥ÁÃ∑§)
ŒÊ¬„U⁄U vv.ÆÆ ‚ vw.xÆ ’¡
(¬ÈSÃ∑§ ⁄UÁ„UÃ)
w.
¬˝Õ◊-’
v|-Æw-wÆwv
’ÈäÊflÊ⁄U
ÁfläÊÊŸ ◊á«U‹ ∑§ •ÁäÊÁŸÿ◊ ÃÕÊ
w.xÆ ÉÊ¥≈U
‚Ê¥ÁflÁäÊ∑§ ÁŸÿ◊ (√ÿÊfl„UÊÁ⁄U∑§)
ŒÊ¬„U⁄U vv.ÆÆ ‚ Æv.xÆ ’¡
(¬ÈSÃ∑§ ‚Á„UÃ)
x.
ÁmÃËÿ
v}-Æw-wÆwv
ªÈM§flÊ⁄U
÷Ê⁄Uà ∑§Ê ‚¥ÁfläÊÊŸ
x ÉÊ¥≈U
(¬ÈSÃ∑§ ‚Á„UÃ)
ŒÊ¬„U⁄U vv.ÆÆ ‚ Æw.ÆÆ ’¡
y.
ÃÎÃËÿ
v~-Æw-wÆwv
‡ÊÈ∑˝§flÊ⁄U
flÊÁáÊÁíÿ∑§ ’„UËπÊÃÊ
w ÉÊ¥≈U
(¬ÈSÃ∑§ ⁄UÁ„UÃ)
ŒÊ¬„U⁄U vv.ÆÆ ‚ Æv.ÆÆ ’¡
z.
øÃÈÕ¸
wÆ-Æw-wÆwv
‡ÊÁŸflÊ⁄U
SÕÊŸËÿ ÁŸÿ◊ ÃÕÊ ‹Ê∑§ ÁŸ◊ʸáÊ
w.xÆ ÉÊ¥≈U
∑§Êÿ¸ ‹πÊ ‚¥Á„UÃÊ (¬ÈSÃ∑§ ‚Á„UÃ)
vv.ÆÆ ‚ Æv.xÆ ’¡
„USÃÊ./-
‚¥øÊ‹∑§.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊíÿ ‚„U∑§Ê⁄UË •ÁäÊ∑§⁄UáÊ, Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U
Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U, ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ y Ÿflê’⁄U wÆwÆ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§/wÆwÆ/wyv.ó¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ‚„U∑§Ê⁄UË ‚Ê‚Êÿ≈UË •ÁäÊÁŸÿ◊ v~{Æ (∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ v| ‚Ÿ˜ v~{v) ∑§Ë äÊÊ⁄UÊ || ∑§Ë ©U¬äÊÊ⁄UÊ (vw)
‚„U¬Á∆Uà ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ‚„U∑§Ê⁄UË ‚Ê‚Êÿ≈UË ÁŸÿ◊ v~{w ∑§ ÁŸÿ◊ z~-∑§ ∑§ ©U¬ÁŸÿ◊ (z) mÊ⁄UÊ ¬˝ŒûÊ ‡ÊÁÄÃÿÊ¥ ∑§Ê ¬˝ÿʪ ◊¥ ‹Êà „ÈU∞, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U
⁄UÊíÿ ‚„U∑§Ê⁄UË •ÁäÊ∑§⁄UáÊ ∑§Ë •ÁäÊ‚ÍøŸÊ ∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ vxv ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ wz •¬˝Ò‹ wÆv{ ∑§ mÊ⁄UÊ ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊíÿ ‚„U∑§Ê⁄UË •ÁäÊ∑§⁄UáÊ ÁflÁŸÿ◊, wÆv{
Áfl⁄UÁøÃ Á∑§ÿÊ „ÒU, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊíÿ ‚„U∑§Ê⁄UË •ÁäÊ∑§⁄UáÊ ÁflÁŸÿ◊ ∑§ •äÿÊÿ (ŒÊ) ◊¥, ÁflÁŸÿ◊ (x) ∑§ ©U¬’¥äÊÊ¥ ∑§ •ŸÈ‚Ê⁄U, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U
⁄UÊíÿ ‚„U∑§Ê⁄UË •ÁäÊ∑§⁄UáÊ, ∞ÃŒ˜mÊ⁄UÊ ÿ„U ÉÊÊ·áÊÊ ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU Á∑§ ∑§Ê⁄UÊŸÊ ◊„UÊ◊Ê⁄UË (∑§ÊflË«U-v~) ∑§Ë flø◊ÊŸ ¬Á⁄UÁSÕÁà ∞fl¥ ãÿÊÿÊ‹ÿ ∑§ ‚Ê◊Êãÿ
‚¥øÊ‹Ÿ§ ∑§ Á‹ÿ ÿ„U •Êfl‡ÿ∑§ „UÊ ªÿÊ „ÒU Á∑§ ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊíÿ ‚„U∑§Ê⁄UË •ÁäÊ∑§⁄UáÊ Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U ∑§Ê ‚Ê◊Êãÿ ‚¥øÊ‹Ÿ ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ v|-vv-wÆwÆ ‚
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwv
[ ÷ʪ v
128
¬˝Ê⁄¥U÷ Á∑§ÿÊ ¡ÊflªÊ ÃÕÊ ∑Ò§ê¬ ∑§Ê≈¸U ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊíÿ ‚„U∑§Ê⁄UË •ÁäÊ∑§⁄UáÊ ∑§Ë üÊ¥π‹Ê ãÿÊÿÊ‹ÿ (∑Ò§ê¬ ∑§Ê≈¸U) ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U ∑§Ê •ÊÿÊ¡Ÿ ◊Ê„U Ÿflê’⁄U
wÆwÆ ‚ ¬˝àÿ∑§ ◊Ê„U ◊¥ ÁmÃËÿ •ÊÒ⁄U ÃÎÃËÿ ‚åÃÊ„U ∑§ fl΄US¬ÁÃflÊ⁄U ∞fl¥ ‡ÊÈ∑˝§flÊ⁄U ∑§Ê Á∑§ÿÊ ¡ÊflªÊ. ÃØ¬‡øÊØ ÁŸ⁄¥UÃ⁄U ¬˝∑§⁄UáÊÊ¥ ¬⁄U ‚ÈŸflÊ߸U ◊Ê„U
∑§ ‡Ê· •flÁäÊ ◊¥ •ÁäÊ∑§⁄UáÊ ∑§ ◊ÈÅÿÊ‹ÿ Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U ◊¥ ‚Ê◊Êãÿ ÁSÕÁà ∑§Ë ’„UÊ‹Ë/•ʪÊ◊Ë •ÁäÊ‚ÍøŸÊ ¡Ê⁄UË „UÊŸ Ã∑§ ∑§Ë ¡ÊflªË.
No./2020/241.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section 12 of Section 77 of the Chhattisgarh
Cooperative society Act, 1960 (No. 17 of 1961) read with sub-rule (5) of Rules 59-A of the Chhattisgarh Cooperative
Societies Rules 1962, the Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Tribunal, has made Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Tribu-
nal Regulation 2016 vide notification No 131 dated 25th April 2016, as per provisions of regulation 3, in chapter two
(II) of the Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Tribunal Regulation 2016, it is Hereby declare that in the present Scenario
of Corona (Covid 19) and Narmal functioning of court. It is required to start narmal functioning of Chhattisgarh State
Cooperative Tribunal, Bilaspur will be started narmal functioning Form Dated 17-11-2020. The camp court of
Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Tribunal Raipur will be conducted in the second and third week from November
2020 on Thursday and Friday of every month. Thereafter the regular hearing of the cases of rest of the months will be
conducted at the tribunal head office Bilaspur till restoration of normalcy/further notification accordingly.
•ÊŒ‡ÊÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U,
∞Ÿ. ∑ȧ¡Í⁄U, ⁄UÁ¡S≈˛UÊ⁄U.
∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ, Á¡‹Ê √ÿʬÊ⁄U ∞fl¥ ©Ulʪ ∑§ãº˝, ⁄UÊ¡ŸÊ¥ŒªÊ¥fl
⁄UÊ¡ŸÊ¥ŒªÊ¥fl, ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ y ÁŒ‚ê’⁄U wÆwÆ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§/Á¡√ÿÊ©U∑§-⁄UÊ¡/SÕʬŸÊ/wÆwÆ/yx~w.ó‚¥øÊ‹∑§ ©Ulʪ, ©Ulʪ ‚¥øÊ‹ŸÊ‹ÿ ¿U.ª., ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U ∑§Ê •ÊŒ‡Ê ∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ xÆ/SÕÊ./
wÆv{/~v{, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ w}-vv-wÆwÆ ∑§ ¬Á⁄U¬Ê‹Ÿ ◊¥ ◊⁄‘U mÊ⁄UÊ ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ xÆ-vv-wÆwÆ ∑§Ê •¬⁄UÊã„U ◊¥ ◊„Uʬ˝’¥äÊ∑§, Á¡‹Ê √ÿʬÊ⁄U ∞fl¥
©Ulʪ ∑§ãº˝, ⁄UÊ¡ŸÊ¥ŒªÊ¥fl ∑§Ê ∑§Êÿ¸÷Ê⁄U ª˝„UáÊ Á∑§ÿÊ ªÿÊ.
SflÃ¥òÊ ∑ȧ◊Ê⁄U Á‚¥„U,
◊„Uʬ˝’¥äÊ∑§.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊíÿ ‚ÍøŸÊ •Êÿʪ
ŸÊÕZ é‹ÊÚ∑§, ‚Ä≈U⁄U-v~, ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U, Á¡‹Ê ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U (¿U.ª.)
ŸflÊ ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, •≈U‹ Ÿª⁄U, ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ | ÁŒ‚ê’⁄U wÆwÆ
∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ v|}y/SÕÊ./¿Uª⁄Uʂ͕Ê/wÆwÆ.ó◊ÈÅÿ ‚ÍøŸÊ •ÊÿÈÄÃ, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊíÿ ‚ÍøŸÊ •Êÿʪ ∑§Ë •äÿˇÊÃÊ ◊¥ •ÊÿÊÁ¡Ã ¬ŒÊãŸÁÃ
‚Á◊Áà ∑§Ë ’Ò∆U∑§ ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ Æz-vw-wÆwÆ ∑§Ê ‚Á◊Áà ∑§Ë •ŸÈ‡Ê¥‚Ê ∑§ •ÊäÊÊ⁄U ¬⁄U üÊË •ÃÈ‹ ∑ȧ◊Ê⁄U fl◊ʸ, ‚„UÊÿ∑§ ª˝«U-v ∑§Ê ©U¬ÿÈÄà ¬Ê∞ ¡ÊŸ
¬⁄U ©UŸ∑§Ê flß ◊ÒÁ≈˛UÄ‚ ‹fl‹-vÆ (yxwÆÆ-vx{zÆÆ) ◊¥ ¬ŒÊãŸÃ ∑§⁄Uà „ÈU∞ •Êÿʪ ◊¥ Á⁄UÄà •ŸÈ÷ʪ •ÁäÊ∑§Ê⁄UË ∑§ ¬Œ ¬⁄U ¬ŒSÕ Á∑§ÿÊ ¡ÊÃÊ
„ÒU.
w.
¬ŒÊãŸÃ ∑§◊¸øÊ⁄UË ∑§Ê •ÊŒ‡Ê ¡Ê⁄UË „UÊŸ ∑§ ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ ‚ vz ÁŒŸ ∑§ ÷ËÃ⁄U ¬Œ ª˝„UáÊ ∑§⁄UŸÊ •Êfl‡ÿ∑§ „UÊªÊ •ãÿÕÊ •ÊŒ‡Ê Sfl◊fl ÁŸ⁄USÃ
◊ÊŸÊ ¡Ê∞ªÊ.
x.
flß ÁŸäÊʸ⁄UáÊ „UÃÈ ÁŸÿ◊ÊŸÈ‚Ê⁄U Áfl∑§À¬ ¬ŒÊãŸÁà •ÊŒ‡Ê ∑§Ë ÁÃÁÕ ‚ ∞∑§ ◊Ê„U ∑§ ÷ËÃ⁄U ŒŸÊ „UʪÊ. ßU‚ ¬˝∑§Ê⁄U ÁŒÿÊ ªÿÊ Áfl∑§À¬
•ÁãÃ◊ ◊ÊŸÊ ¡Ê∞ªÊ. ÁŸäÊʸÁ⁄Uà ‚◊ÿ ∑§ ÷ËÃ⁄U Áfl∑§À¬ ¬˝Êåà Ÿ„UË¥ „UÊŸ ¬⁄U ÁŸÿ◊Ê¥ ∑§ •¥Ãª¸Ã flß ÁŸäÊʸ⁄UáÊ ∑§⁄U ÁŒÿÊ ¡Ê∞ªÊ.
y.
ÿ„U •ÊŒ‡Ê ◊ÊŸŸËÿ ©UìÊ ãÿÊÿÊ‹ÿ ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U ◊¥ ÁfløÊ⁄UÊäÊËŸ Á⁄U≈U ¬ËÁ≈U‡ÊŸ ∑˝§◊Ê¥∑§ «UéÀÿÍ.¬Ë.∞‚. v}vv/wÆv~ ◊¥ ◊ÊŸŸËÿ
©UìÊ ãÿÊÿÊ‹ÿ ∑§ ¬ÊÁ⁄Uà •ÊŒ‡Ê ∑§ •äÿÊäÊËŸ „UʪÊ.
•Ê߸U. •Ê⁄U. Œ„UÊ⁄UË,
‚Áøfl.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwv
÷ʪ v ]
129
∑§Êÿʸ‹ÿ ◊ÈÅÿ ÁŸflʸøŸ ¬ŒÊÁœ∑§Ê⁄UË, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U
‡ÊÊSòÊË øÊÒ∑§, ¬È⁄UÊŸÊU ◊¢òÊÊ‹ÿ ¬Á⁄U‚⁄U, ⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U
⁄UÊÿ¬È⁄U, ÁŒŸÊ¥∑§ w~ ÁŒ‚ê’⁄U wÆwÆ
»§Ê.∑˝§-v}/Æx/ÁŸflʸøŸ ÿÊÁø∑§Ê/wÆv}/x{wy.ó÷Ê⁄Uà ÁŸflʸøŸ •Êÿʪ, Ÿß¸ ÁŒÀ‹Ë mÊ⁄UÊ ¡Ê⁄UË •Áœ‚ÍøŸÊ ‚¢ÅÿÊ }w/¿U.ª.-‹Ê.‚./
(Æy/wÆv~)/wÆwÆ ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ vy ÁŒ‚¥’⁄U, wÆwÆ— ‹Ê∑§ ¬˝ÁÃÁŸÁœàfl •ÁœÁŸÿ◊, v~zv (v~zv ∑§Ê yx) ∑§Ë œÊ⁄UÊ vÆ{ ∑§ •ŸÈ‚⁄UáÊ ◊¥, ÷Ê⁄UÃ
ÁŸflʸøŸ •Êÿʪ ∞ÃŒ˜ÔmÊ⁄UÊ ÁŸflʸøŸ •¡Ë¸ ‚¢ÅÿÊ-Æy/wÆv~ ◊¥ ÁŒ∞ ª∞ ©UìÊ ãÿÊÿÊ‹ÿ, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U ∑§ ÃÊ⁄UËπ vÆ ¡Ÿfl⁄UË, wÆwÆ ∑§
•ÊŒ‡Ê ∑§Ê ⁄UÊÖÿ ∑§ ‡ÊÊ‚∑§Ëÿ ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ ◊¥ ‚fl¸‚ÊœÊ⁄UáÊ ∑§Ë ¡ÊŸ∑§Ê⁄UË „UÃÈ ¬˝∑§ÊÁ‡Êà Á∑§ÿÊ ¡ÊÃÊ „ÒU.
(∑§. ‚Ë. Œfl‚ŸÊ¬ÁÃ)
•ÁÃÁ⁄UÄà ◊ÈÅÿ ÁŸflʸøŸ ¬ŒÊÁœ∑§Ê⁄UË.
÷Ê⁄Uà ÁŸflʸøŸ •Êÿʪ
ÁŸflʸøŸ ‚ŒŸ, •‡ÊÊ∑§ ⁄UÊ«U, Ÿß¸ ÁŒÀ‹Ë-vvÆÆÆv
Ÿß¸ ÁŒÀ‹Ë, ÃÊ⁄UËπ vy ÁŒ‚ê’⁄U, wÆwÆówx •ª˝„UÊÿáÊ, v~yw (‡Ê∑§)
‚¢. }w/¿U.ª.-Áfl.‚./(Æy/wÆv~)/wÆwÆ.ó‹Ê∑§ ¬˝ÁÃÁŸÁœàfl •ÁœÁŸÿ◊, v~zv (v~zv ∑§Ê yx) ∑§Ë œÊ⁄UÊ vÆ{ ∑§ •ŸÈ‚⁄UáÊ ◊¥,
÷Ê⁄Uà ÁŸflʸøŸ •Êÿʪ ∞ÃŒ˜ÔmÊ⁄UÊ ÁŸflʸøŸ •¡Ë¸ ‚¢. Æy/wÆv~ ◊¥ ÁŒÿ ªÿ ©UìÊ ãÿÊÿÊ‹ÿ, ¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U, Á’‹Ê‚¬È⁄U ∑§ ÃÊ⁄UËπ vÆ ¡Ÿfl⁄UË, wÆwÆ
∑§ •ÊŒ‡Ê ∑§Ê ¬˝∑§ÊÁ‡Êà ∑§⁄UÃÊ „ÒU.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Election Petition No. 4 of 2019
(Judgment delivered on 10-01-2020)
Goutam Buddha Agrawal, S/o. Late Shri Ram Krishna Agrawal, Aged About 70 Years, Occupation-
Civil Court Stamp Vendor, Raipur, R/o. Purani Basti, Baniya Para, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur
Chhattisgarh.
------Petitioner
VERSUS
1.
Satyanarayan Sharma. S/o. Late Shri Jagdish Prasad Sharma, Aged About 75 years. R/o. Anand Niketan,
Avanti Vihar Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Indian Nationalcongress Candidate)
2.
Nand Kumar Sahu@ Nande Bhaiyya, S/o. Late Shri Manglu Sahu, Aged About 59 Years. R/o. Village
Boriyakala, Post Sejbahar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Bhartiya Janta Party Candidate)
3.
Dr. Omprakash Dewangan, R/o. In Front Of Adwani School, Birgaon, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
Pin 49221. (Janata Congress Chhattisgarh (J) Candidate)
4.
Narendra Kumar Baghel, S/o. Shri Chaitram Baghel, Aged About 37 Years. R/o. House No. 99, Village
Bhatgaon Post Mana Basti, Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Independent Candidate)
5.
Pitamber Jangde, S/o Shri Khorbahra, Aged About 42 Years, R/o. Etwari Bazar Chowk Birgaon, District
Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Independent Candidate)
6.
Dr. Sanket Thakur, S/o. Late Shri Vishvendra Thakur, Aged About 54 Years, R/o. House No. B-32, Shriram
Vihar, Purena, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Aam Admi Party (Aap) Candidate)
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwv
[ ÷ʪ v
130
7.
Gendlal Dadsena, Aged About 50 Years, R/o. House No. 1061/28, Sector-1, In Front Of Extension P-27
Avanti Vihar, Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Independent Candidate)
8.
Chandrakant Bhai Solanki, S/o Late Shri Rama Bhai Solanki, Aged About 51 Years R/o. K-21, Steel City,
Avanti Vihar, Raipur Chhattisgarh. Pin 492006. (Independent)
9.
Sandeep Yadu, R/o. Village And Police Station Mujgahan, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Indepen-
dent Candidate)
10.
Baldev Prakash Dviwedi, S/o Shri Tara Prasad Dwivedi, Aged About 36 Years, R/o. Bharkapara, Tatibandh,
Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Independent Candidate)
11.
Budharu Ram Banjare @ B. R. Banjare, S/o Shri Dhanauram Banjare, Aged About 66 Years, R/o. T-56,
Sector-5, Extension, Avanti Vihar, Telibandha, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Indepen-
dent Candidate)
12.
Motiram Verma, S/o. Shri Bhishma Lal, Aged About 54 Years, R/o. Ward No. 10 Banjari Nagar, Birgaon,
District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Independent Candidate)
13.
Banmali Chhura, S/o Shri Chitaru Chhura, Aged About 36 Years, R/o. House No. 668, Village Purena,
Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Bhartiya Bahujan Party Candidate)
14.
Fulraj Verma. S/o. Shri Bhadu Verma, Aged About 42 Years, R/o. House No. 183/K, Ward No. 5, Village
Kalkasa, Tahsil Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. (Bhartiya Bahujan Congress Candidate).
15.
Krishna Murari Yadav, S/o. Shri Horilal Yadav. Aged About 44 Years. R/o. Tillu Chowk, Purani Basti, Near
Sub Post Office Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Independent Candidate)
16.
Satyanarayan Sonwani, S/o, Shri Aghar Das, Aged about 72 Years, Harinbhata, Post Bansa, Police Station
And Tahsil Simga, District Balaudabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. (Independent Candidate)
17.
Lakhmuram Tandan, S/o. Shri Panchram Tandan, Aged About 43 Years, R/o. Dr. Ambedkar Ward, Kondagaon,
District Kondagaon. (Rashtriya Jansabha Party Candidate)
18.
Rajendra Kumar Sahu, S/o Late Shri Kuleshwar Sahu, Aged About 50 Years, R/o. Vaman Rao Lakhe, Ward
No. 64, Near malasay Talab, Piyush Nagar, Kushalpur, Tahsil And Distrit Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Indepen-
dent Candidate)
19.
Mohd. Usman Sheikh, S/o Mohd. Israeel, Aged About 55 Years, R/o. Jogi Nagar, Tarun Bazar Behind
Dr. Narada Sahu, (Mathpuraina), Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Independent Candidate)
20.
Mohd. Aurangzeb, S/o Haider Ali, Aged About 31 Years, R/o. Gazinagar, Near Toran Kirana Store Birrgaon,
Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Independent Candidate)
21.
Mangalchand Ghritlahre, S/o Shri Thukuram Ghritlahre, Aged About 55 Years, R/o. Mana Camp, Raipur,
District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Republic Party Of India (A) Candidate)
22.
Smt. Shamim Khan, W/o. Abdul Riyaz Khan, Aged About 42 Years, R/o. Ward No. 04, Bazar Chowk,
Bhanpuri, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 492008. (Bhartiya Lokmat Rashtrawadi Party Candidate)
23.
(Deleted) As Per Court Order Dated 25-02-2019 & 07-03-2019.
24.
(Deleted) As Per Court Order Dated 25-02-2019 & 07-03-2019.
25.
(Deleted) As per Court Order Dated 25-02-2019 & 07-03-2019.
-------Respondents
For Petitioner
:
Mr. Lavkush Kumar Sahu, Advocate
For Respondent No. 1
:
Dr. N. K. Shukla, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Sharma & Mr. Priyankesh
Chandrakar, Advocate.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwv
÷ʪ v ]
131
Hon’ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
C.A.V. Judgment
10-01-2020
1.
This order will govern the disposal of the application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC seeking dismissal of
the election petition filed by the respondent/returned candidate.
2.
As per the pleading made, on 02-11-2018, the petitioner submitted nomination form before the Returning
Officer for the Legislative Assembly Constituency No. 48 Raipur Rural. The pleading further is that after
perusal of the documents submitted by the petitioner the returning officer intimated the petitioner that one
of the proposer of the petitioner is not the voter of the assembly constituency and directed the petitioner to
remove the defect within a stipulated time. The petitioner Could not remove the said deficiency, in a result,
the returning officer rejected the nomination form for want of proper number of proposer. It is pleaded that
the return candidate/respondent No. 1 Satya Narayan Sharma was a candidate of Indian National Congress
submitted his nomination form on 31-10-2018. On 03-11-2018 the scrutiny of the nomination form was
made and certain objections were raised by the petitioner about wrong discloser of certain averments in the
nomination form by the return candidate however those objections were eventually rejected. It is contended
by the petitioner that while rejecting the nomination form of the petitioner, the returning officer was hand in
gloves with respondent No. 1/the return candidate. Therefore, undue favour was made to the return candi-
date. by accepting his nomination form. It is admitted fact that the respondent No. 1 was declared as
returned candidate of Raipur Rural. The petitioner contended that the election of the returned candidate
cannot be said to be a valid and legal election for the reason that his nomination papers were wrongly
accepted. therefore, the same is sought to be canceled. The prayer is made that the acceptance of the
nomination paper filed by respondent No. 1 was improper and illegal, therefore, consequently, the election
would be void.
3.
After notice an application has been filed by returned candidate under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The primary
objection is made that the petitioner is not the voter of constituency number 48 of Raipur Rural. It is further
contended that the nomination paper of petitioner was rejected during the scrutiny. therefore, he cannot be
deemed to be the candidate in the election in a result he has no locus standi to file the election petition. It is
further stated in application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC that the nomination papers were filed by the
petitioner knowing full well that one of his proposer is not the voter of constituency and when the returning
officer had asked to rectify the same. the same was deliberately not done and therefore. the nomination
papers were rejected for the reason that very filing of nomination paper by the petitioner was erroneous at
it’s inception. It is further stated by the respondent since the petitioner himself did not remove the defect
despite time given to him, the petitioner cannot maintain the election petition for want of locus standi. It is
further submitted that the objection raised by the petitioner as against the nomination papers of the respon-
dent/returned candidate, no substantial grounds were raised which requires any adjudication and predomi-
nantly/election petition is not tenable for want of locus standi of the petitioner.
4.
Learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 would submit that Section 81 of the Representation of peoples
Act, 1951 (for short ‘the Act, 1951’) the election petition is maintainable by a candidate or an elector, the
petitioner is neither was a candidate as his nomination papers were rejected at the threshold and despite
being asked to cure this defect the petitioner did not do it. Referring to Section 33 of the Act, 1951, it is
stated that the petitioner was not set up by a recognized political party, therefore, the nomination papers
were required to be subscribed by 10 proposers being the electors of the said constituency. Since one of the
electors of the proposer was not of the constituency and the nomination having been rejected on the same
ground, the petitioner cannot said to have the locus standi to maintain the election petition. Referring to
Section 36 of the Act, 1951, counsel would submit that during the scrutiny of the nomination the defect of
subscribe by 10 electors to the nomination papers of the petitioner was found and one elector since was not
an elector, therefore, the returning officer in exercise of Section 36(2) (b) of the Act, 1951 has rejected the
nomination papers. It is submitted that the petitioner has challenged the acceptance of nomination papers of
returned candidate but has not challenged the rejection of his nomination papers, therefore, he has no locus
standi. Further reliance is placed to the case of AIR 2007 SC 2924 & AIR 2011 SC 2634 and it is submitted
that no pleading has been made that the returning officer has wrongly rejected the nomination paper of the
petitioner, therefore, the petitioner has no cause of action to maintain the petition.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwv
[ ÷ʪ v
132
5.
Per contra, learned counsel for the petitioner would place his reliance in the case of 2018 (14) SCC 1 and
would submit that the acceptance of the nomination paper is wrong and it would be deemed to have mate-
rially affected the election results and the election petition has to be read as a whole. Consequently, the
application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC is liable to be dismissed.
6.
Heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the pleadings made in the petition.
7.
The averments of the petition are that the petitioner filed his nomination papers as an independent
candidate. Section 33 of the Act, 1951 governs the presentation of nomination paper and requirements for
a valid nomination. The initial three proviso, which are relevant to the case along with Section 33 are
reproduced herein.
“[33.
Presentation of nomination paper and requirements for a valid nomination :—
(1)
On or before the date appointed under clause (a) of section 30 each candidate shall, either
in person or by his proposer, between the hours of eleven o’clock in the forenoon
and three o’clock in the afternoon deliver to the returning officer at the place specified in
this behalf in the notice issued under section 31 a nomination paper completed in the
prescribed form and signed by the candidate and by an elector of the constituency as
proposer :
[Provided that a candidate not set up by a recongnised political party, shall not be deemed
to be duly nominated for election from a constituency unless the nomination paper is
subscribed by ten proposers being electors of the constituency:
Provided further that no nomination paper shall be delivered to the returning officer on a
day which is a public holiday:
Provided also that in the case of a local authorities constituency, graduates constituency
or teachers constituency, the reference to “an elector of the constituency as proposer”
shall be construed as a reference to ten percent of the electors of the constituency or ten
such electors, whichever is less, as proposers.]”
8.
Since, the petitioner pleaded that he was an independent candidate. therefore, as per the requirement of first
proviso to Section 33 of the Act, 1951, the nomination paper was required to be subscribed by ten proposers
being electors of the constituency. The word ‘elector’ has been defined under sub-section (e) of Section 2 of
the Act, 1951, which reads as under:
“2(e)
“elector” in relation to a constituency means a person whose name is entered in the electoral roll of
that constituency for the time being in force and who is not subject to any of the disqualification
mentioned in section 16 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 (43 of 1950)”
9.
It is the case of the petitioner that his nomination paper was rejected on the ground that one of the proposer
was not elector/voter of the Assembly constituency No. 48. Since the petitioner could not remove the said
defect within the time prescribed, his nomination paper was canceled. Clause (b) of Sub Section 2 of
Section 36 of the Act. 1951 which is relevant to deal this issue in hand reads as under:
“36.
Scrutiny of nomination—
(1)
.............xxx.........xxx...........
(2)
(a)
.............xxx.........xxx...........
(b)
that there has been a failure to comply with any of the provisions of section 33 or
section 34; or
(c)
............xxx..........xxx...........
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwv
÷ʪ v ]
133
10.
Reading of clause (b) of sub section 2 of Section 36 of the Act, 1951 allows the rejection of the nomination
paper in case there is a failure to comply with any of the provisions of section 33 or section 34. In the instant
case, the petitioner’s nomination was canceled for the reason that he could not cure the defect to bring one
elector who subscribed the nomination papers of petitioner. Out of ten proposers one was not a voter/elector
of the same constituency. Consequently, the nomination papers were rejected. Therefore, the question arise
whether the petitioner has a locus standi to maintain this petition, as he was not a duly nominated candidate
under the provisions of the Act, 1951 and the Constitution of India. As per the pleading of the petitioner, the
petitioner though was given time to cure the defect to bring one proposer who was not a voter out of ten
proposers the defect could no be cured within time given. Therefore, it would show there has been a willful
defiance to cure the defect on the part of petitioner to come within the ambit of candidate.
11.
Section 33 of the Act, 1951 provides for presentation of nomination paper and requirements of a valid
nomination. Section 33(1) provides for the date and time of submitting the nomination paper. The proviso to
Section 33(1) requires the nomination paper to be subscribed by ten proposers, if the candidate is not set up
by a recognized political party. Consequently, primarily the presentation of the petition apparently does not
qualify to be either a candidate in the election or the elector as required under Section 81 of the Act, 1951.
Admittedly. the petitioner was not an elector of the same constituency, which has been admitted in reply to
the application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC wherein the petitioner categorically admits that he is not
the voter of the Constituency No. 48 of Raipur Rural of Legislative Assembly of Chhattisgarh. Only on bare
reading of the pleading of the petition without requirement of any evidence, the basic defect as to the
qualification clause as required under Section 81 of the Act, 1951 holds the sway in favour of return candi-
date.
12.
As per the law laid down in Pathula Rama Rao v. Pendyala Venkata Krishna Rao & Ors. reported in AIR
2007 SC 2924 wherein the proviso clause of sub-section(1) of Section 33 has been interpreted by their
Lordship, it has been held that a candidate who is not set up by a recognized political party shall not be
deemed to be duly nominated unless his nomination paper is subscribed by ten proposers who are electors
of the same constituency. It has been further held the use of words ‘set up’ by a recognized party in the said
proviso shows that a positive act was required with reference to the candidate. The Supreme Court further
held if the nomination of candidate had been rejected for non-compliance with the first provise to sub-
section (1) of Section 33. that is, the candidate’s nomination not being subscribed by ten voters as proposers.
then the election petitioner who set out a plea that the nonination was improperly rejected then the election
petition should contain averments to the effect that the nomination was subscribed by ten proposers who
were electors of the same constituency and therefore, the nomination was valid. In absence of such aver-
ments, it cannot be said that the election petition contains a material facts to make out a cause of action.
13.
In the instant election petition though the petitioner has alleged that the nomination of the return candidate
was improperly accepted. the same could be gone into only when the petitioner himself qualifies to main-
tain the election petition under Section 81 of the Act of 1951. For sake of brevity Section 81 of the Act of
1951 is reporduced hereunder :—
“81.
Presentation of petitions.—
(1)
An election petition calling in question any election may be presented on one or more of
the grounds specified in sub-section (1) of section 100 and section 101 to the High Court
by any candidate at such election or any elector within forty-five days from, but not
earlier than the date of election of the returned candidate or if there are more than one
returned candidate at the election and detes of their election are different, the later of
those two dates.
Explanation— In this sub-section, “elector” means a person who was entitled to vote at
the election to which the election petition relates, whether he has voted at such
election or not.
(3)
Every election petition shall be accompanied by as many copies thereof as there are re-
spondents mentioned in the petition and every such copy shall be attested by the peti-
tioner under his own signature to be a true copy of the petition.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwv
[ ÷ʪ v
134
14.
In the case relied on by the petitioner i.e. Madiraju Venkata Ramana Raju v. Peddireddigari Ramachandra
Reddy & Others reported in (2018) 14 SCC 1, wherrein their Lordship has held there is difference between
improper acceptance of nomination of a returned candidate and improper acceptance of any other candi-
date, but in order to alleged those facts the person who challenges the election petition should qualify all the
requirements of Section 81 of the Act, 1951.
15.
The petitioner has not contended in this petition that his nomination was improperly rejected and has
pleaded that the nomination was improperly accepted that of the return candidate. In order to prove those
facts the election petitioner at first should have the locus standi. The petitioner has to himself qualify the
requirement of Section 81 of the Act, 1951 to maintain the petition. Therefore, the ratio laid down in (2018)
14 SCC 1 cannot be applied in favour of the petitioner.
16.
In view of the aforesaid discussion, prima facie, on the basis of the pleading of the petition, It is found that
the petitioner has no. locus standi to maintain this petition. The petitioner is neither the elector or duly
nominated candidate in terms of first proviso of sub-section 1 of Section 33 read with clause (b) of sub-
section 2 of Section 36 of the Act, 1951. Therefore, in absence of material facts, necessarily to make out a
cause of action under Section 100 read with Section 81 of the Act, 1951, the petition sans merit. Accord-
ingly. in a necessary fall out of the aforesaid discussion, the application under Order 7 Rule 11 of C.P.C. is
allowed. The election petition is dismissed.
Sd/-
GOUTAM BHADURI
JUDGE
•ÊŒ‡Ê ‚,
„USÃÊ./-
(Ÿ⁄‘Uãº˝ ŸÊ. ’È≈UÊÁ‹ÿÊ)
flÁ⁄UDU ¬˝äÊÊŸ ‚Áøfl,
÷Ê⁄Uà ÁŸflʸøŸ •Êÿʪ.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwv
÷ʪ v ]
135
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwv
[ ÷ʪ v
136
ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi-110001
New Delhi, dated 14th December, 2020—23 Agrahayana, 1942 (Saka)
No. 82/CG-LA/(04/2019)/2020.—In pursuance of Section 106 of the Representation of the People Act,
1951 (43 of 1951), the Election Commission hereby publish Order dated the 10th, January 2020 of the High Court of
Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, in Election Petition No. 04 of 2019.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Election Petition No. 4 of 2019
(Judgment delivered on 10-01-2020)
Goutam Buddha Agrawal, S/o. Late Shri Ram Krishna Agrawal, Aged About 70 Years, Occupation-
Civil Court Stamp Vendor, Raipur, R/o. Purani Basti, Baniya Para, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur
Chhattisgarh.
------Petitioner
VERSUS
1.
Satyanarayan Sharma. S/o. Late Shri Jagdish Prasad Sharma, Aged About 75 years, R/o. Anand Niketan,
Avanti Vihar Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Indian Nationalcongress Candidate)
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwv
÷ʪ v ]
137
2.
Nand Kumar Sahu@ Nande Bhaiyya, S/o. Late Shri Manglu Sahu, Aged About 59 Years. R/o. Village
Boriyakala, Post Sejbahar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Bhartiya Janta Party Candidate)
3.
Dr. Omprakash Dewangan, R/o. In Front Of Adwani School, Birgaon, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
Pin 49221. (Janata Congress Chhattisgarh (J) Candidate)
4.
Narendra Kumar Baghel, S/o. Shri Chaitram Baghel, Aged About 37 Years. R/o. House No. 99, Village
Bhatgaon Post Mana Basti, Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Independent Candidate)
5.
Pitamber Jangde, S/o Shri Khorbahra, Aged About 42 Years, R/o. Etwari Bazar Chowk Birgaon, District
Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Independent Candidate)
6.
Dr. Sanket Thakur, S/o. Late Shri Vishvendra Thakur, Aged About 54 Years, R/o. House No. B-32, Shriram
Vihar, Purena, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Aam Admi Party (Aap) Candidate)
7.
Gendlal Dadsena, Aged About 50 Years, R/o. House No. 1061/28, Sector-1, In Front Of Extension P-27
Avanti Vihar, Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Independent Candidate)
8.
Chandrakant Bhai Solanki, S/o Late Shri Rama Bhai Solanki, Aged About 51 Years R/o. K-21, Steel City,
Avanti Vihar, Raipur Chhattisgarh. Pin 492006. (Independent)
9.
Sandeep Yadu, R/o. Village And Police Station Mujgahan, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Indepen-
dent Candidate)
10.
Baldev Prakash Dviwedi, S/o Shri Tara Prasad Dwivedi, Aged About 36 Years, R/o. Bharkapara, Tatibandh,
Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Independent Candidate)
11.
Budharu Ram Banjare @ B. R. Banjare, S/o Shri Dhanauram Banjare, Aged About 66 Years, R/o. T-56,
Sector-5, Extension, Avanti Vihar, Telibandha, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Indepen-
dent Candidate)
12.
Motiram Verma, S/o. Shri Bhishma Lal, Aged About 54 Years, R/o. Ward No. 10 Banjari Nagar, Birgaon,
District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Independent Candidate)
13.
Banmali Chhura, S/o Shri Chitaru Chhura, Aged About 36 Years, R/o. House No. 668, Village Purena,
Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Bhartiya Bahujan Party Candidate)
14.
Fulraj Verma. S/o. Shri Bhadu Verma, Aged About 42 Years, R/o. House No. 183/K, Ward No. 5, Village
Kalkasa, Tahsil Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. (Bhartiya Bahujan Congress Candidate).
15.
Krishna Murari Yadav, S/o. Shri Horilal Yadav. Aged About 44 Years. R/o. Tillu Chowk, Purani Basti, Near
Sub Post Office Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Independent Candidate)
16.
Satyanarayan Sonwani, S/o, Shri Aghar Das, Aged about 72 Years, Harinbhata, Post Bansa, Police Station
And Tahsil Simga, District Balaudabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. (Independent Candidate)
17.
Lakhmuram Tandan, S/o. Shri Panchram Tandan, Aged About 43 Years, R/o. Dr. Ambedkar Ward, Kondagaon,
District Kondagaon. (Rashtriya Jansabha Party Candidate)
18.
Rajendra Kumar Sahu, S/o Late Shri Kuleshwar Sahu, Aged About 50 Years, R/o. Vaman Rao Lakhe, Ward
No. 64, Near malasay Talab, Piyush Nagar, Kushalpur, Tahsil And Distrit Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Indepen-
dent Candidate)
19.
Mohd. Usman Sheikh, S/o Mohd. Israeel, Aged About 55 Years, R/o. Jogi Nagar, Tarun Bazar Behind
Dr. Narada Sahu, (Mathpuraina), Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Independent Candidate)
20.
Mohd. Aurangzeb, S/o Haider Ali, Aged About 31 Years, R/o. Gazinagar, Near Toran Kirana Store Birrgaon,
Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Independent Candidate)
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwv
[ ÷ʪ v
138
21.
Mangalchand Ghritlahre, S/o Shri Thukuram Ghritlahre, Aged About 55 Years, R/o. Mana Camp, Raipur,
District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Republic Party Of India (A) Candidate)
22.
Smt. Shamim Khan, W/o. Abdul Riyaz Khan, Aged About 42 Years, R/o. Ward No. 04, Bazar Chowk,
Bhanpuri, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 492008. (Bhartiya Lokmat Rashtrawadi Party Candidate)
23.
(Deleted) As Per Court Order Dated 25-02-2019 & 07-03-2019.
24.
(Deleted) As Per Court Order Dated 25-02-2019 & 07-03-2019.
25.
(Deleted) As per Court Order Dated 25-02-2019 & 07-03-2019.
-------Respondents
For Petitioner
:
Mr. Lavkush Kumar Sahu, Advocate
For Respondent No. 1
:
Dr. N. K. Shukla, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Sharma & Mr. Priyankesh
Chandrakar, Advocate.
Hon’ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
C.A.V. Judgment
10-01-2020
1.
This order will govern the disposal of the application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC seeking dismissal of
the election petition filed by the respondent/returned candidate.
2.
As per the pleading made, on 02-11-2018, the petitioner submitted nomination form before the Returning
Officer for the Legislative Assembly Constituency No. 48 Raipur Rural. The pleading further is that after
perusal of the documents submitted by the petitioner the returning officer intimated the petitioner that one
of the proposer of the petitioner is not the voter of the assembly constituency and directed the petitioner to
remove the defect within a stipulated time. The petitioner Could not remove the said deficiency, in a result,
the returning officer rejected the nomination form for want of proper number of proposer. It is pleaded that
the return candidate/respondent No. 1 Satya Narayan Sharma was a candidate of Indian National Congress
submitted his nomination form on 31-10-2018. On 03-11-2018 the scrutiny of the nomination form was
made and certain objections were raised by the petitioner about wrong discloser of certain averments in the
nomination form by the return candidate however those objections were eventually rejected. It is contended
by the petitioner that while rejecting the nomination form of the petitioner, the returning officer was hand in
gloves with respondent No. 1/the return candidate. Therefore, undue favour was made to the return candi-
date. by accepting his nomination form. It is admitted fact that the respondent No. 1 was declared as
returned candidate of Raipur Rural. The petitioner contended that the election of the returned candidate
cannot be said to be a valid and legal election for the reason that his nomination papers were wrongly
accepted. therefore, the same is sought to be canceled. The prayer is made that the acceptance of the
nomination paper filed by respondent No. 1 was improper and illegal, therefore, consequently, the election
would be void.
3.
After notice an application has been filed by returned candidate under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The primary
objection is made that the petitioner is not the voter of constituency number 48 of Raipur Rural. It is further
contended that the nomination paper of petitioner was rejected during the scrutiny. therefore, he cannot be
deemed to be the candidate in the election in a result he has no locus standi to file the election petition. It is
further stated in application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC that the nomination papers were filed by the
petitioner knowing full well that one of his proposer is not the voter of constituency and when the returning
officer had asked to rectify the same. the same was deliberately not done and therefore. the nomination
papers were rejected for the reason that very filing of nomination paper by the petitioner was erroneous at
it’s inception. It is further stated by the respondent since the petitioner himself did not remove the defect
despite time given to him, the petitioner cannot maintain the election petition for want of locus standi. It is
further submitted that the objection raised by the petitioner as against the nomination papers of the respon-
dent/returned candidate, no substantial grounds were raised which requires any adjudication and predomi-
nantly/election petition is not tenable for want of locus standi of the petitioner.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwv
÷ʪ v ]
139
4.
Learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 would submit that Section 81 of the Representation of peoples
Act, 1951 (for short ‘the Act, 1951’) the election petition is maintainable by a candidate or an elector, the
petitioner is neither was a candidate as his nomination papers were rejected at the threshold and despite
being asked to cure this defect the petitioner did not do it. Referring to Section 33 of the Act, 1951, it is
stated that the petitioner was not set up by a recognized political party, therefore, the nomination papers
were required to be subscribed by 10 proposers being the electors of the said constituency. Since one of the
electors of the proposer was not of the constituency and the nomination having been rejected on the same
ground, the petitioner cannot said to have the locus standi to maintain the election petition. Referring to
Section 36 of the Act, 1951, counsel would submit that during the scrutiny of the nomination the defect of
subscribe by 10 electors to the nomination papers of the petitioner was found and one elector since was not
an elector, therefore, the returning officer in exercise of Section 36(2) (b) of the Act, 1951 has rejected the
nomination papers. It is submitted that the petitioner has challenged the acceptance of nomination papers of
returned candidate but has not challenged the rejection of his nomination papers, therefore, he has no locus
standi. Further reliance is placed to the case of AIR 2007 SC 2924 & AIR 2011 SC 2634 and it is submitted
that no pleading has been made that the returning officer has wrongly rejected the nomination paper of the
petitioner, therefore, the petitioner has no cause of action to maintain the petition.
5.
Per contra, learned counsel for the petitioner would place his reliance in the case of 2018 (14) SCC 1 and
would submit that the acceptance of the nomination paper is wrong and it would be deemed to have mate-
rially affected the election results and the election petition has to be read as a whole. Consequently, the
application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC is liable to be dismissed.
6.
Heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the pleadings made in the petition.
7.
The averments of the petition are that the petitioner filed his nomination papers as an independent
candidate. Section 33 of the Act, 1951 governs the presentation of nomination paper and requirements for
a valid nomination. The initial three proviso, which are relevant to the case along with Section 33 are
reproduced herein.
“[33.
Presentation of nomination paper and requirements for a valid nomination :—
(1)
On or before the date appointed under clause (a) of section 30 each candidate shall, either
in person or by his proposer, between the hours of eleven o’clock in the forenoon
and three o’clock in the afternoon deliver to the returning officer at the place specified in
this behalf in the notice issued under section 31 a nomination paper completed in the
prescribed form and signed by the candidate and by an elector of the constituency as
proposer :
[Provided that a candidate not set up by a recongnised political party, shall not be deemed
to be duly nominated for election from a constituency unless the nomination paper is
subscribed by ten proposers being electors of the constituency:
Provided further that no nomination paper shall be delivered to the returning officer on a
day which is a public holiday:
Provided also that in the case of a local authorities constituency, graduates constituency
or teachers constituency, the reference to “an elector of the constituency as proposer”
shall be construed as a reference to ten percent of the electors of the constituency or ten
such electors, whichever is less, as proposers.]”
8.
Since, the petitioner pleaded that he was an independent candidate. therefore, as per the requirement of first
proviso to Section 33 of the Act, 1951, the nomination paper was required to be subscribed by ten proposers
being electors of the constituency. The word ‘elector’ has been defined under sub-section (e) of Section 2 of
the Act, 1951, which reads as under:
“2(e)
“elector” in relation to a constituency means a person whose name is entered in the electoral roll of
that constituency for the time being in force and who is not subject to any of the disqualification
mentioned in section 16 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 (43 of 1950)”
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwv
[ ÷ʪ v
140
9.
It is the case of the petitioner that his nomination paper was rejected on the ground that one of the proposer
was not elector/voter of the Assembly constituency No. 48. Since the petitioner could not remove the said
defect within the time prescribed, his nomination paper was canceled. Clause (b) of Sub Section 2 of
Section 36 of the Act. 1951 which is relevant to deal this issue in hand reads as under:
“36.
Scrutiny of nomination—
(1)
.............xxx.........xxx...........
(2)
(a)
.............xxx.........xxx...........
(b)
that there has been a failure to comply with any of the provisions of section 33 or
section 34; or
(c)
............xxx..........xxx...........
10.
Reading of clause (b) of sub section 2 of Section 36 of the Act, 1951 allows the rejection of the nomination
paper in case there is a failure to comply with any of the provisions of section 33 or section 34. In the instant
case, the petitioner’s nomination was canceled for the reason that he could not cure the defect to bring one
elector who subscribed the nomination papers of petitioner. Out of ten proposers one was not a voter/elector
of the same constituency. Consequently, the nomination papers were rejected. Therefore, the question arise
whether the petitioner has a locus standi to maintain this petition, as he was not a duly nominated candidate
under the provisions of the Act, 1951 and the Constitution of India. As per the pleading of the petitioner, the
petitioner though was given time to cure the defect to bring one proposer who was not a voter out of ten
proposers the defect could no be cured within time given. Therefore, it would show there has been a willful
defiance to cure the defect on the part of petitioner to come within the ambit of candidate.
11.
Section 33 of the Act, 1951 provides for presentation of nomination paper and requirements of a valid
nomination. Section 33(1) provides for the date and time of submitting the nomination paper. The proviso to
Section 33(1) requires the nomination paper to be subscribed by ten proposers, if the candidate is not set up
by a recognized political party. Consequently, primarily the presentation of the petition apparently does not
qualify to be either a candidate in the election or the elector as required under Section 81 of the Act, 1951.
Admittedly. the petitioner was not an elector of the same constituency, which has been admitted in reply to
the application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC wherein the petitioner categorically admits that he is not
the voter of the Constituency No. 48 of Raipur Rural of Legislative Assembly of Chhattisgarh. Only on bare
reading of the pleading of the petition without requirement of any evidence, the basic defect as to the
qualification clause as required under Section 81 of the Act, 1951 holds the sway in favour of return candi-
date.
12.
As per the law laid down in Pathula Rama Rao v. Pendyala Venkata Krishna Rao & Ors. reported in AIR
2007 SC 2924 wherein the proviso clause of sub-section(1) of Section 33 has been interpreted by their
Lordship, it has been held that a candidate who is not set up by a recognized political party shall not be
deemed to be duly nominated unless his nomination paper is subscribed by ten proposers who are electors
of the same constituency. It has been further held the use of words ‘set up’ by a recognized party in the said
proviso shows that a positive act was required with reference to the candidate. The Supreme Court further
held if the nomination of candidate had been rejected for non-compliance with the first provise to sub-
section (1) of Section 33. that is, the candidate’s nomination not being subscribed by ten voters as proposers.
then the election petitioner who set out a plea that the nonination was improperly rejected then the election
petition should contain averments to the effect that the nomination was subscribed by ten proposers who
were electors of the same constituency and therefore, the nomination was valid. In absence of such aver-
ments, it cannot be said that the election petition contains a material facts to make out a cause of action.
13.
In the instant election petition though the petitioner has alleged that the nomination of the return candidate
was improperly accepted. the same could be gone into only when the petitioner himself qualifies to main-
tain the election petition under Section 81 of the Act of 1951. For sake of brevity Section 81 of the Act of
1951 is reporduced hereunder :—
“81.
Presentation of petitions.—
(1)
An election petition calling in question any election may be presented on one or more of
the grounds specified in sub-section (1) of section 100 and section 101 to the High Court
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwv
÷ʪ v ]
141
by any candidate at such election or any elector within forty-five days from, but not
earlier than the date of election of the returned candidate or if there are more than one
returned candidate at the election and detes of their election are different, the later of
those two dates.
Explanation— In this sub-section, “elector” means a person who was entitled to vote at
the election to which the election petition relates, whether he has voted at such
election or not.
(3)
Every election petition shall be accompanied by as many copies thereof as there are re-
spondents mentioned in the petition and every such copy shall be attested by the peti-
tioner under his own signature to be a true copy of the petition.
14.
In the case relied on by the petitioner i.e. Madiraju Venkata Ramana Raju v. Peddireddigari Ramachandra
Reddy & Others reported in (2018) 14 SCC 1, wherrein their Lordship has held there is difference between
improper acceptance of nomination of a returned candidate and improper acceptance of any other candi-
date, but in order to alleged those facts the person who challenges the election petition should qualify all the
requirements of Section 81 of the Act, 1951.
15.
The petitioner has not contended in this petition that his nomination was improperly rejected and has
pleaded that the nomination was improperly accepted that of the return candidate. In order to prove those
facts the election petitioner at first should have the locus standi. The petitioner has to himself qualify the
requirement of Section 81 of the Act, 1951 to maintain the petition. Therefore, the ratio laid down in (2018)
14 SCC 1 cannot be applied in favour of the petitioner.
16.
In view of the aforesaid discussion, prima facie, on the basis of the pleading of the petition, It is found that
the petitioner has no. locus standi to maintain this petition. The petitioner is neither the elector or duly
nominated candidate in terms of first proviso of sub-section 1 of Section 33 read with clause (b) of sub-
section 2 of Section 36 of the Act, 1951. Therefore, in absence of material facts, necessarily to make out a
cause of action under Section 100 read with Section 81 of the Act, 1951, the petition sans merit. Accord-
ingly. in a necessary fall out of the aforesaid discussion, the application under Order 7 Rule 11 of C.P.C. is
allowed. The election petition is dismissed.
Sd/-
GOUTAM BHADURI
JUDGE
By order,
Sd/-
(NARENDRA N. BUTOLIA)
Sinior Principal Secretary,
Election Commission of India.
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwv
[ ÷ʪ v
142
¿UûÊË‚ª…∏U ⁄UÊ¡¬òÊ, ÁŒŸÊ¢∑§ w~ ¡Ÿfl⁄UËU wÆwv
÷ʪ v ]
143