jkti=] fgekpy izns'k

fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr

f”keyk] eaxyokj 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

fgekpy izns'k ljdkj

m|ksx foHkkx

vf/klwpuk

f”keyk&2] 16 tuojh] 2012

la[;k b.M&II (,Q½ 6&5@2006-&fgekpy izns”k dh jkT;iky] fgekpy izns”k ekbZuj feujYt

¼dUls”ku½ fjokbZTM :Yt] 1971 ds :y 20 ds lc&:y ¼2½ ds v/khu mUgsa fufgr “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx

djrs gq,] mDr fu;eksa ls layXu QLVZ 'kSM;wy esa fuEufyf[kr la”kks/ku djrh gSa] vFkkZr~%&

QLVZ 'kSM~;wy dk izfrLFkkiu-&fgekpy izns”k ekbZuj feujYt ¼dUls”ku½ fjokbZTM :Yt] 1971 ls

layXu QLVZ 'kSMw;y ds LFkku ij fuEufyf[kr j[kk tk,xk] vFkkZr~%&

213&jkti=@2012&17&1&2012 ¼5127½

5128

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

Sr. No.

Name of Mineral

Rate of Royalty

(per tonne)

1.

Building stones, Masonry

Rs. 40.00

stones including Boulders

and Shingle.

2.

Limestone

Rs. 65.00

3.

Marble:

(a) Used for lime burning

Rs. 65.00

(b) Dressed, carved and rough

Rs. 300.00

marble slabs.

(c) Marble chips, fine powder,

Rs. 65.00

Khandas.

(d) Coarse powder of not

Rs. 65.00

more than plus 20 mash.

4.

Bajri

Rs. 40.00

5.

Brick earth

Rs. 20.00

6.

Ordinary sand/clay/shale

Rs. 40.00

7.

(a) Rough slab slate

Rs. 100.00

(b) Slate Rs. 300.00

(c) Quartzite slate

Rs. 300.00

8.

Kankar, road metal, blast and rorri.

Rs. 40.00

9.

Cut or dressed blocks of granite

Rs. 400.00

and traps/basalt including rocks

of other colours and shades (size

180x80x50 cms or more).

10.

All other minor mineral not herein

25% of the

specified.

Sale value at

pit mouth.".

;g la”kks/ku bl vf/klwpuk ds jkti= fgekpy izns”k esa izdk”ku dh rkjh[k ls izo`r gksxkA

vkns”k }kjk]

gLrk{kfjr@&

iz/kku lfpo ¼m|ksx½A

&&&&&&&&&

[Authoritative English text of this department notification number Ind-II(F)6-5/2006 dated

16.1.2012 as required under Clause (3) of article 348 of the Constitution of India].

INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 16^th January, 2012

No.Ind-II(F)6-5/2006.—In exercise of the power vested in her under sub-rule (2) of rule 20

of the Himachal Pradesh Minor Minerals (Concession) Revised Rules, 1971, the Governor of

Himachal Pradesh is pleased to make the following amendment in the First Schedule appended to

the said Rules, namely:-

5129

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

Substitution of First Schedule.—For the First Schedule appended to the Himachal Pradesh

Minor Minerals (Concession) Revised Rules, 1971, the following shall be substituted, namely:-

Sr.

Name of Mineral

Rate of Royalty

No. (per tonne)

1.

Building stones, Masonry

Rs. 40.00

stones including Boulders

and Shingle.

2.

Limestone

Rs. 65.00

3.

Marble:

(a)

Used for lime burning

Rs. 65.00

(b)

Dressed, carved and rough

Rs. 300.00

marble slabs.

(c)

Marble chips, fine powder,

Rs. 65.00

Khandas.

(d)

Coarse powder of not

Rs. 65.00

more than plus 20 mash.

4.

Bajri

Rs. 40.00

5.

Brick earth

Rs. 20.00

6.

Ordinary sand/clay/shale

Rs. 40.00

7.

(a) Rough slab slate

Rs. 100.00

(b) Slate

Rs. 300.00

(c) Quartzite slate

Rs. 300.00

8.

Kankar, road metal, blast and

Rs. 40.00

Rorri.

9.

Cut or dressed blocks of granite

Rs. 400.00

and traps/basalt including rocks

of other colours and shades

(size 180x80x50 cms or more).

10.

All other minor minerals not

25% of the

herein specified.

Sale value at

pit mouth.".

This amendment shall come into force from the date of publication of this notification in the

Rajpatra, Himachal Pradesh.

By order,

Sd/-

Principal Secretary (Industries).

_________

yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx

vf/klwpuk

f'keyk&2] 11 tuojh] 2012

la[;k ih-ch-MCy;w-¼ch½ ,Q ¼5½87@2011-&;r% fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky dks ;g izrhr gksrk gS

fd fgekpy izns'k ljdkj dks ljdkjh O;; ij lkoZtfud iz;kstu gsrq uker xkao ikUnyh] rglhy

dksV[kkbZ] ftyk f'keyk] fgekpy izns'k eas fB;ksx&dksV[kkbZ&gkVdksVh lM+d ds fuekZ.k gsrq fy, Hkwfe

5130

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

vftZr djuh visf{kr gS] vr,o ,rn~}kjk ;g vf/klwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd mDr ifj{ks= eas tSlk fd fuEu

fooj.kh eas fufnZ"V fd;k x;k gS] mijksDr iz;kstu ds fy, Hkwfe dk vtZu visf{kr gSA

2-

;g vf/klwpuk ,sls lHkh O;fDr;kas dks] tks blls lEcfU/kr gks ldrs gSa] dh tkudkjh ds

fy, Hkw&vtZu vf/kfu;e] 1894 dh /kkjk&4 ds micU/kkas ds vUrxZr tkjh dh tkrh gSA

3-

iwokZsDr /kkjk }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;kas dk iz;ksx djrs gq, jkT;iky] fgekpy izns'k bl le;

bl midze easas dk;Zjr lHkh vf/kdkfj;kas muds deZpkfj;kas vkSj Jfedkasas dks bykds dh fdlh Hkh Hkwfe eas izos'k

djus vkSj loZs{k.k djus rFkk ml /kkjk }kjk visf{kr vFkok vuqer% vU; lHkh dk;kZsZa dks djus ds fy,

lg"kZ izkf/kdkj nsrs gSaA

4-

dksbZ Hkh fgrc) O;fDr ftls mDr ifj{ks= eas dfFkr Hkwfe ds vtZu ij dksbZ vkifRr gks rks

og bl vf/klwpuk ds izdkf'kr gksus ds 30 fnukas dh vof/k ds Hkhrj Hkw&vtZu lekgrkZ] yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx

¼f'k0 {ks0½] foUVj fQYM] f'keyk ds le{k fyf[kr :Ik ls vkifRr nk;j dj ldrk gSA

fooj.kh

ftyk

Rkglhy

Xkkao

[kljk uEcj

{ks= ¼ gSDVs;j eas½

f'keyk

dksV[kkbZ

ikUnyh

800@1

0&03&46

807@1

0&00&11

dqy tksM+ fdrk&2

0&03&57

vkns'k }kjk]

gLrk{kfjr@&

iz/kku lfpo ¼yksd fuekZ.k½A

&&&&&&

yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx

vf/klwpuk

f'keyk&2] 11 tuojh] 2012

la[;k ih-ch-MCy;w-¼ch½ ,Q ¼5½86@2011-&;r% fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky dks ;g izrhr gksrk gS

fd fgekpy izns'k ljdkj dks ljdkjh O;; ij lkoZtfud iz;kstu gsrq uker xkao v.kw] rglhy dksV[kkbZ]

ftyk f'keyk] fgekpy izns'k eas fB;ksx&dksV[kkbZ&gkVdksVh lM+d ds fuekZ.k gsrq fy, Hkwfe vftZr djuh

visf{kr gS] vr,o ,rn~}kjk ;g vf/klwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd mDr ifj{ks= eas tSlk fd fuEu fooj.kh eas

fufnZ"V fd;k x;k gS] mijksDr iz;kstu ds fy, Hkwfe dk vtZu visf{kr gSA

2-

;g vf/klwpuk ,sls lHkh O;fDr;kas dks] tks blls lEcfU/kr gks ldrs gSa] dh tkudkjh ds

fy, Hkw&vtZu vf/kfu;e] 1894 dh /kkjk&4 ds micU/kkas ds vUrxZr tkjh dh tkrh gSA

3-

iwokZsDr /kkjk }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;kas dk iz;ksx djrs gq, jkT;iky] fgekpy izns'k bl le;

bl midze easas dk;Zjr lHkh vf/kdkfj;kas muds deZpkfj;kas vkSj Jfedkasas dks bykds dh fdlh Hkh Hkwfe eas izos'k

djus vkSj loZs{k.k djus rFkk ml /kkjk }kjk visf{kr vFkok vuqer% vU; lHkh dk;kZsZa dks djus ds fy,

lg"kZ izkf/kdkj nsrs gSaA

5131

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

4-

dksbZ Hkh fgrc) O;fDr ftls mDr ifj{ks= eas dfFkr Hkwfe ds vtZu ij dksbZ vkifRr gks rks

og bl vf/klwpuk ds izdkf'kr gksus ds 30 fnukas dh vof/k ds Hkhrj Hkw&vtZu lekgrkZ] yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx

¼n0 {ks0½] foUVj fQYM] f'keyk ds le{k fyf[kr :Ik ls vkifRr nk;j dj ldrk gSA

fooj.kh

ftyk

Rkglhy

Xkkao

[kljk uEcj

{ks= ¼ gSDVs;j eas½

f'keyk

dksV[kkbZ

v.kw

148@2

0&09&57

153

0&09&62

dqy tksM+ fdrk&2

0&19&19

vkns'k }kjk]

gLrk{kfjr@&

iz/kku lfpo ¼yksd fuekZ.k½A

&&&&&&

yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx

vf/klwpuk

f'keyk&2] 11 tuojh] 2012

la[;k ih-ch-MCy;w-¼ch½ ,Q ¼5½84@2011-&;r% fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky dks ;g izrhr gksrk gS

fd fgekpy izns'k ljdkj dks ljdkjh O;; ij lkoZtfud iz;kstu gsrq uker xkao tyVkgj] rglhy

dksV[kkbZ] ftyk f'keyk] fgekpy izns'k eas fB;ksx&dksV[kkbZ&gkVdksVh lM+d ds fuekZ.k gsrq fy, Hkwfe

vftZr djuh visf{kr gS] vr,o ,rn~}kjk ;g vf/klwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd mDr ifj{ks= eas tSlk fd fuEu

fooj.kh eas fufnZ"V fd;k x;k gS] mijksDr iz;kstu ds fy, Hkwfe dk vtZu visf{kr gSA

2-

;g vf/klwpuk ,sls lHkh O;fDr;kas dks] tks blls lEcfU/kr gks ldrs gSa] dh tkudkjh ds

fy, Hkw&vtZu vf/kfu;e] 1894 dh /kkjk&4 ds micU/kkas ds vUrxZr tkjh dh tkrh gSA

3-

iwokZsDr /kkjk }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;kas dk iz;ksx djrs gq, jkT;iky] fgekpy izns'k bl le;

bl midze easas dk;Zjr lHkh vf/kdkfj;kas muds deZpkfj;kas vkSj Jfedkasas dks bykds dh fdlh Hkh Hkwfe eas izos'k

djus vkSj loZs{k.k djus rFkk ml /kkjk }kjk visf{kr vFkok vuqer% vU; lHkh dk;kZsZa dks djus ds fy,

lg"kZ izkf/kdkj nsrs gSaA

4-

dksbZ Hkh fgrc) O;fDr ftls mDr ifj{ks= eas dfFkr Hkwfe ds vtZu ij dksbZ vkifRr gks rks

og bl vf/klwpuk ds izdkf'kr gksus ds 30 fnukas dh vof/k ds Hkhrj Hkw&vtZu lekgrkZ] yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx

¼n0 {ks0½] foUVj fQYM] f'keyk ds le{k fyf[kr :Ik ls vkifRr nk;j dj ldrk gSA

fooj.kh

ftyk

Rkglhy

Xkkao

[kljk uEcj

{ks= ¼ gSDVs;j eas½

f'keyk

dksV[kkbZ

tyVkgj

136

0&01&76

152@1

0&00&44

dqy tksM+ fdrk&2

0&02&20

vkns'k }kjk]

gLrk{kfjr@&

iz/kku lfpo ¼yksd fuekZ.k½A

5132

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx

vf/klwpuk

f'keyk&2] 11 tuojh] 2012

la[;k ih-ch-MCy;w-¼ch½ ,Q ¼5½81@2011-&;r% fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky dks ;g izrhr gksrk gS

fd fgekpy izns'k ljdkj dks ljdkjh O;; ij lkoZtfud iz;kstu gsrq uker xkao /kkj] rglhy tqCcy]

ftyk f'keyk] fgekpy izns'k eas fB;ksx&dksV[kkbZ&gkVdksVh lM+d ds fuekZ.k gsrq fy, Hkwfe vftZr djuh

visf{kr gS] vr,o ,rn~}kjk ;g vf/klwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd mDr ifj{ks= eas tSlk fd fuEu fooj.kh eas

fufnZ"V fd;k x;k gS] mijksDr iz;kstu ds fy, Hkwfe dk vtZu visf{kr gSA

2-

;g vf/klwpuk ,sls lHkh O;fDr;kas dks] tks blls lEcfU/kr gks ldrs gSa] dh tkudkjh ds

fy, Hkw&vtZu vf/kfu;e] 1894 dh /kkjk&4 ds micU/kkas ds vUrxZr tkjh dh tkrh gSA

3-

iwokZsDr /kkjk }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;kas dk iz;ksx djrs gq, jkT;iky] fgekpy izns'k bl le;

bl midze easas dk;Zjr lHkh vf/kdkfj;kas muds deZpkfj;kas vkSj Jfedkasas dks bykds dh fdlh Hkh Hkwfe eas izos'k

djus vkSj loZs{k.k djus rFkk ml /kkjk }kjk visf{kr vFkok vuqer% vU; lHkh dk;kZsZa dks djus ds fy,

lg"kZ izkf/kdkj nsrs gSaA

4-

dksbZ Hkh fgrc) O;fDr ftls mDr ifj{ks= eas dfFkr Hkwfe ds vtZu ij dksbZ vkifRr gks rks

og bl vf/klwpuk ds izdkf'kr gksus ds 30 fnukas dh vof/k ds Hkhrj Hkw&vtZu lekgrkZ] yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx

¼n0 {ks0½] foUVj fQYM] f'keyk ds le{k fyf[kr :Ik ls vkifRr nk;j dj ldrk gSA

fooj.kh

ftyk

Rkglhy

Xkkao

[kljk uEcj

{ks= ¼ gSDVs;j eas½

f'keyk

dksV[kkbZ

/kkj

967

0&23&02

30

0&04&23

955

0&04&72

961

0&08&34

28

0&00&42

25

0&00&86

dqy tksM+ fdrk&6

0&41&59

vkns'k }kjk]

gLrk{kfjr@&

iz/kku lfpo ¼yksd fuekZ.k½A

&&&&&&

yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx

vf/klwpuk

f'keyk&2] 13 tuojh] 2012

la[;k ih-ch-MCy;w-¼ch½ ,Q ¼5½80@2011-&;r% fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky dks ;g izrhr gksrk gS

fd fgekpy izns'k ljdkj dks ljdkjh O;; ij lkoZtfud iz;kstu gsrq uker xkao cjkMk] rglhy jksgMw]

ftyk f'keyk] fgekpy izns'k eas fB;ksx&dksV[kkbZ&gkVdksVh lM+d ds fuekZ.k gsrq fy, Hkwfe vftZr djuh

visf{kr gS] vr,o ,rn~}kjk ;g vf/klwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd mDr ifj{ks= eas tSlk fd fuEu fooj.kh eas

fufnZ"V fd;k x;k gS] mijksDr iz;kstu ds fy, Hkwfe dk vtZu visf{kr gSA

5133

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

2-

;g vf/klwpuk ,sls lHkh O;fDr;kas dks] tks blls lEcfU/kr gks ldrs gSa] dh tkudkjh ds

fy, Hkw&vtZu vf/kfu;e] 1894 dh /kkjk&4 ds micU/kkas ds vUrxZr tkjh dh tkrh gSA

3-

iwokZsDr /kkjk }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;kas dk iz;ksx djrs gq, jkT;iky] fgekpy izns'k bl le;

bl midze easas dk;Zjr lHkh vf/kdkfj;kas muds deZpkfj;kas vkSj Jfedkasas dks bykds dh fdlh Hkh Hkwfe eas izos'k

djus vkSj loZs{k.k djus rFkk ml /kkjk }kjk visf{kr vFkok vuqer% vU; lHkh dk;kZsZa dks djus ds fy,

lg"kZ izkf/kdkj nsrs gSaA

4-

dksbZ Hkh fgrc) O;fDr ftls mDr ifj{ks= eas dfFkr Hkwfe ds vtZu ij dksbZ vkifRr gks rks

og bl vf/klwpuk ds izdkf'kr gksus ds 30 fnukas dh vof/k ds Hkhrj Hkw&vtZu lekgrkZ] yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx

¼n0 {ks0½] foUVj fQYM] f'keyk ds le{k fyf[kr :Ik ls vkifRr nk;j dj ldrk gSA

fooj.kh

ftyk

Rkglhy

Xkkao

[kljk uEcj

{ks= ¼ gSDVs;j eas½

f'keyk

jksgMw cjkMk

1344

0&02&94

dqy tksM+ fdrk&21

0&02&94

vkns'k }kjk]

gLrk{kfjr@&

iz/kku lfpo ¼yksd fuekZ.k½A

&&&&&&

yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx

vf/klwpuk

f'keyk&2] 11 tuojh] 2012

la[;k ih-ch-MCy;w-¼ch½ ,Q ¼5½78@2011-&;r% fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky dks ;g izrhr gksrk gS

fd fgekpy izns'k ljdkj dks ljdkjh O;; ij lkoZtfud iz;kstu gsrq uker xkao dlkSyh] rglhy

dlkSyh] ftyk lksyu] eas x<[ky&xqukbZ lM+d ds fuekZ.k gsrq fy, Hkwfe vftZr djuh visf{kr gS] vr,o

,rn~}kjk ;g vf/klwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd mDr ifj{ks= eas tSlk fd fuEu fooj.kh eas fufnZ"V fd;k x;k gS]

mijksDr iz;kstu ds fy, Hkwfe dk vtZu visf{kr gSA

2-

;g vf/klwpuk ,sls lHkh O;fDr;kas dks] tks blls lEcfU/kr gks ldrs gSa] dh tkudkjh ds

fy, Hkw&vtZu vf/kfu;e] 1894 dh /kkjk&4 ds micU/kkas ds vUrxZr tkjh dh tkrh gSA

3-

iwokZsDr /kkjk }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;kas dk iz;ksx djrs gq, jkT;iky] fgekpy izns'k bl le;

bl midze easas dk;Zjr lHkh vf/kdkfj;kas muds deZpkfj;kas vkSj Jfedkasas dks bykds dh fdlh Hkh Hkwfe eas izos'k

djus vkSj loZs{k.k djus rFkk ml /kkjk }kjk visf{kr vFkok vuqer% vU; lHkh dk;kZsZa dks djus ds fy,

lg"kZ izkf/kdkj nsrs gSaA

4-

dksbZ Hkh fgrc) O;fDr ftls mDr ifj{ks= eas dfFkr Hkwfe ds vtZu ij dksbZ vkifRr gks rks

og bl vf/klwpuk ds izdkf'kr gksus ds 30 fnukas dh vof/k ds Hkhrj Hkw&vtZu lekgrkZ] yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx

¼f'k0 {ks0½] foUVj fQYM] f'keyk ds le{k fyf[kr :Ik ls vkifRr nk;j dj ldrk gSA

fooj.kh

ftyk

Rkglhy

Xkkao

[kljk uEcj

{ks= ¼ch?kk½

lksyu

dlkSyh

dlkSyh

492

0&7

497

0&4

dqy tksM+ fdrk&2

0&11

vkns'k }kjk]

gLrk{kfjr@&

iz/kku lfpo ¼yksd fuekZ.k½A

5134

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx

vf/klwpuk

f'keyk&2] 11 tuojh] 2012

la[;k ih-ch-MCy;w-¼ch½ ,Q ¼5½79@2011-&;r% fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky dks ;g izrhr gksrk gS

fd fgekpy izns'k ljdkj dks ljdkjh O;; ij lkoZtfud iz;kstu gsrq uker xkao nksgph] rglhy

dlkSyh] ftyk lksyu] eas fdEew?kkV&pDdh dk eksM lM+d ds fuekZ.k gsrq fy, Hkwfe vftZr djuh visf{kr

gS] vr,o ,rn~}kjk ;g vf/klwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd mDr ifj{ks= eas tSlk fd fuEu fooj.kh eas fufnZ"V

fd;k x;k gS] mijksDr iz;kstu ds fy, Hkwfe dk vtZu visf{kr gSA

2-

;g vf/klwpuk ,sls lHkh O;fDr;kas dks] tks blls lEcfU/kr gks ldrs gSa] dh tkudkjh ds

fy, Hkw&vtZu vf/kfu;e] 1894 dh /kkjk&4 ds micU/kkas ds vUrxZr tkjh dh tkrh gSA

3-

iwokZsDr /kkjk }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;kas dk iz;ksx djrs gq, jkT;iky] fgekpy izns'k bl le;

bl midze easas dk;Zjr lHkh vf/kdkfj;kas muds deZpkfj;kas vkSj Jfedkasas dks bykds dh fdlh Hkh Hkwfe eas izos'k

djus vkSj loZs{k.k djus rFkk ml /kkjk }kjk visf{kr vFkok vuqer% vU; lHkh dk;kZsZa dks djus ds fy,

lg"kZ izkf/kdkj nsrs gSaA

4-

dksbZ Hkh fgrc) O;fDr ftls mDr ifj{ks= eas dfFkr Hkwfe ds vtZu ij dksbZ vkifRr gks rks

og bl vf/klwpuk ds izdkf'kr gksus ds 30 fnukas dh vof/k ds Hkhrj Hkw&vtZu lekgrkZ] yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx

¼f'k0 {ks0½] foUVj fQYM] f'keyk ds le{k fyf[kr :Ik ls vkifRr nk;j dj ldrk gSA

fooj.kh

ftyk

Rkglhy

Xkkao

[kljk uEcj

{ks= ¼ch?kk½

lksyu

dlkSyh

nksgph

198@78@2@2@1

1&0

dqy tksM+ fdrk&1

1&0

vkns'k }kjk]

gLrk{kfjr@&

iz/kku lfpo ¼yksd fuekZ.k½A

&&&&&&

yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx

vf/klwpuk

f'keyk&2] 12 tuojh] 2012

la[;k ih-ch-MCy;w-¼ch½ ,Q ¼5½176@2008-&;r% fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky dks ;g izrhr gksrk gS

fd fgekpy izns'k ljdkj dks ljdkjh O;; ij lkoZtfud iz;kstu gsrq uker xkao gkj] rglhy ikyeiqj]

ftyk dkaxM+k] eas Hkokjuk&t;flagiqj lM+d ds fuekZ.k gsrq fy, Hkwfe vftZr djuh visf{kr gS] vr,o

,rn~}kjk ;g vf/klwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd mDr ifj{ks= eas tSlk fd fuEu fooj.kh eas fufnZ"V fd;k x;k gS]

mijksDr iz;kstu ds fy, Hkwfe dk vtZu visf{kr gSA

2-

;g vf/klwpuk ,sls lHkh O;fDr;kas dks] tks blls lEcfU/kr gks ldrs gSa] dh tkudkjh ds

fy, Hkw&vtZu vf/kfu;e] 1894 dh /kkjk&4 ds micU/kkas ds vUrxZr tkjh dh tkrh gSA

3-

iwokZsDr /kkjk }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;kas dk iz;ksx djrs gq, jkT;iky] fgekpy izns'k bl le;

bl midze easas dk;Zjr lHkh vf/kdkfj;kas muds deZpkfj;kas vkSj Jfedkasas dks bykds dh fdlh Hkh Hkwfe eas izos'k

5135

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

djus vkSj loZs{k.k djus rFkk ml /kkjk }kjk visf{kr vFkok vuqer% vU; lHkh dk;kZsZa dks djus ds fy,

lg"kZ izkf/kdkj nsrs gSaA

4-

dksbZ Hkh fgrc) O;fDr ftls mDr ifj{ks= eas dfFkr Hkwfe ds vtZu ij dksbZ vkifRr gks rks

og bl vf/klwpuk ds izdkf'kr gksus ds 30 fnukas dh vof/k ds Hkhrj Hkw&vtZu lekgrkZ] yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx

dkaxM+k] fgekpy izns'k ds le{k fyf[kr :Ik ls vkifRr nk;j dj ldrk gSA

fooj.kh

ftyk

Rkglhy

Xkkao

[kljk uEcj

{ks= ¼gS0 esa½

dkaxM+k

ikyeiqj

gkj

274@2@1

0&00&48

275@2@1

0&00&80

dqy tksM+ fdrk&2

0&01&28

vkns'k }kjk]

gLrk{kfjr@&

iz/kku lfpo ¼yksd fuekZ.k½A

&&&&&&

yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx

vf/klwpuk

f'keyk&2] 11 tuojh] 2012

la[;k ih-ch-MCy;w-¼ch½ ,Q ¼5½175@2009-&;r% fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky dks ;g izrhr gksrk gS

fd fgekpy izns'k ljdkj dks ljdkjh O;; ij lkoZtfud iz;kstu gsrq uker xkao@ekStk Hkokjuk] rglhy

ikyeiqj] ftyk dkaxM+k] eas Hkokjuk&t;flagiqj lM+d ds fuekZ.k gsrq fy, Hkwfe vftZr djuh visf{kr gS]

vr,o ,rn~}kjk ;g vf/klwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd mDr ifj{ks= eas tSlk fd fuEu fooj.kh eas fufnZ"V fd;k

x;k gS] mijksDr iz;kstu ds fy, Hkwfe dk vtZu visf{kr gSA

2-

;g vf/klwpuk ,sls lHkh O;fDr;kas dks] tks blls lEcfU/kr gks ldrs gSa] dh tkudkjh ds

fy, Hkw&vtZu vf/kfu;e] 1894 dh /kkjk&4 ds micU/kkas ds vUrxZr tkjh dh tkrh gSA

3-

iwokZsDr /kkjk }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;kas dk iz;ksx djrs gq, jkT;iky] fgekpy izns'k bl le;

bl midze easas dk;Zjr lHkh vf/kdkfj;kas muds deZpkfj;kas vkSj Jfedkasas dks bykds dh fdlh Hkh Hkwfe eas izos'k

djus vkSj loZs{k.k djus rFkk ml /kkjk }kjk visf{kr vFkok vuqer% vU; lHkh dk;kZsZa dks djus ds fy,

lg"kZ izkf/kdkj nsrs gSaA

4-

dksbZ Hkh fgrc) O;fDr ftls mDr ifj{ks= eas dfFkr Hkwfe ds vtZu ij dksbZ vkifRr gks rks

og bl vf/klwpuk ds izdkf'kr gksus ds 30 fnukas dh vof/k ds Hkhrj Hkw&vtZu lekgrkZ] yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx

dkaxM+k] fgekpy izns'k ds le{k fyf[kr :Ik ls vkifRr nk;j dj ldrk gSA

fooj.kh

ftyk

Rkglhy

Xkkao

[kljk uEcj

{ks= ¼gS0 esa½

dkaxM+k

ikyeiqj

Hkokjuk

1388@1

0&00&26

1389@1

0&01&00

1390@1

0&00&25

1391

0&00&74

dqy tksM+ fdrk&4

0&02&25

vkns'k }kjk]

gLrk{kfjr@&

iz/kku lfpo ¼yksd fuekZ.k½A

5136

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx

vf/klwpuk

f'keyk&2] 13 tuojh] 2012

la[;k ih-ch-MCy;w-¼ch½ ,Q ¼5½177@2009-&;r% fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky dks ;g izrhr gksrk gS

fd fgekpy izns'k ljdkj dks ljdkjh O;; ij lkoZtfud iz;kstu gsrq uker xkao patgsM] rglhy

ikyeiqj] ftyk dkaxM+k] eas Hkokjuk&t;flagiqj lM+d ds fuekZ.k gsrq fy, Hkwfe vftZr djuh visf{kr gS]

vr,o ,rn~}kjk ;g vf/klwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd mDr ifj{ks= eas tSlk fd fuEu fooj.kh eas fufnZ"V fd;k

x;k gS] mijksDr iz;kstu ds fy, Hkwfe dk vtZu visf{kr gSA

2-

;g vf/klwpuk ,sls lHkh O;fDr;kas dks] tks blls lEcfU/kr gks ldrs gSa] dh tkudkjh ds

fy, Hkw&vtZu vf/kfu;e] 1894 dh /kkjk&4 ds micU/kkas ds vUrxZr tkjh dh tkrh gSA

3-

iwokZsDr /kkjk }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;kas dk iz;ksx djrs gq, jkT;iky] fgekpy izns'k bl le;

bl midze easas dk;Zjr lHkh vf/kdkfj;kas muds deZpkfj;kas vkSj Jfedkasas dks bykds dh fdlh Hkh Hkwfe eas izos'k

djus vkSj loZs{k.k djus rFkk ml /kkjk }kjk visf{kr vFkok vuqer% vU; lHkh dk;kZsZa dks djus ds fy,

lg"kZ izkf/kdkj nsrs gSaA

4-

dksbZ Hkh fgrc) O;fDr ftls mDr ifj{ks= eas dfFkr Hkwfe ds vtZu ij dksbZ vkifRr gks rks

og bl vf/klwpuk ds izdkf'kr gksus ds 30 fnukas dh vof/k ds Hkhrj Hkw&vtZu lekgrkZ] yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx

dkaxM+k] fgekpy izns'k ds le{k fyf[kr :Ik ls vkifRr nk;j dj ldrk gSA

fooj.kh

ftyk

Rkglhy

Xkkao

[kljk uEcj

{ks= ¼gS0 esa½

dkaxM+k

ikyeiqj

patgsM

585@417@1

0&01&15

586@417@1

0&02&07

dqy tksM+ fdrk&2

0&03&22

vkns'k }kjk]

gLrk{kfjr@&

iz/kku lfpo ¼yksd fuekZ.k½A

&&&&&&

yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx

vf/klwpuk

f'keyk&2] 13 tuojh] 2012

la[;k ih-ch-MCy;w-¼ch½ ,Q ¼5½163@2009-&;r% fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky dks ;g izrhr gksrk gS

fd fgekpy izns'k ljdkj dks ljdkjh O;; ij lkoZtfud iz;kstu gsrq uker xkao Fkyh] rglhy djlksx]

ftyk e.Mh] eas thi ;ksX; iqy ds fuekZ.k gsrq fy, Hkwfe vftZr djuh visf{kr gS] vr,o ,rn~}kjk ;g

vf/klwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd mDr ifj{ks= eas tSlk fd fuEu fooj.kh eas fufnZ"V fd;k x;k gS] mijksDr

iz;kstu ds fy, Hkwfe dk vtZu visf{kr gSA

2-

;g vf/klwpuk ,sls lHkh O;fDr;kas dks] tks blls lEcfU/kr gks ldrs gSa] dh tkudkjh ds

fy, Hkw&vtZu vf/kfu;e] 1894 dh /kkjk&4 ds micU/kkas ds vUrxZr tkjh dh tkrh gSA

5137

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

3-

iwokZsDr /kkjk }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;kas dk iz;ksx djrs gq, jkT;iky] fgekpy izns'k bl le;

bl midze easas dk;Zjr lHkh vf/kdkfj;kas muds deZpkfj;kas vkSj Jfedkasas dks bykds dh fdlh Hkh Hkwfe eas izos'k

djus vkSj loZs{k.k djus rFkk ml /kkjk }kjk visf{kr vFkok vuqer% vU; lHkh dk;kZsZa dks djus ds fy,

lg"kZ izkf/kdkj nsrs gSaA

4-

dksbZ Hkh fgrc) O;fDr ftls mDr ifj{ks= eas dfFkr Hkwfe ds vtZu ij dksbZ vkifRr gks rks

og bl vf/klwpuk ds izdkf'kr gksus ds 30 fnukas dh vof/k ds Hkhrj Hkw&vtZu lekgrkZ] yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx

e.Mh] fgekpy izns'k ds le{k fyf[kr :Ik ls vkifRr nk;j dj ldrk gSA

fooj.kh

ftyk

Rkglhy

Xkkao

[kljk uEcj

{ks= ¼ch?kk&foLok esa½

e.Mh

djlksx

Fkyh

77

0&01&08

120

0&06&00

121

0&06&09

1413@122

0&08&16

1414@122

0&08&16

dqy tksM+ fdrk&5

0&11&09

vkns'k }kjk]

gLrk{kfjr@&

iz/kku lfpo ¼yksd fuekZ.k½A

&&&&&&

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 04th June, 2011

No. 11-2/95(lab) ID/Kinnour.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute

about the following issue exist between Sh. Ashok Kumar Thakur C/O CITU Office, Near Distt.

Hospital Reckongpeo, Distt. Kinnour, H.P. V/s The General Manager, M/S SCL Infratech Ltd.

Tidong Hydro Electric Project, Kinnour, Distt. Kinnour, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under

Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Ashok Kumar Thakur (Electrician) C/O

CITU Office Near Distt. Hospital Reckongpeo, Distt. Kinnour, H.P. by the

management of M/s SCL Infratech Ltd. Tidong Hydro Electric Project. Kinnour, Distt.

5138

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

Kinnour, H.P. w.e.f. 13.4.2010 without following the provisions of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the above named workman is legal and justified? If

not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named worker is entitled

to from the concerned management?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 04th June, 2011

No. 11-2/95(lab) ID/Kinnour.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute

about the following issue exist between Sh. Ashwani C/O CITU Office, Near Distt. Hospital

Reckongpeo, Distt. Kinnour, H.P. V/s The General manager, M/S SCL Infratech Ltd. Tidong

Hydro Electric Project, Kinnour, Distt. Kinnour, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under

Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Ashwani (Welder) C/O CITU Office Near

Distt. Hospital Reckongpeo, Distt. Kinnour, H.P. by the management of M/s SCL

Infratech Ltd. Tidong Hydro Electric Project. Kinnour, Distt. Kinnour, H.P. w.e.f.

13.4.2010 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as

alleged by the above named workman is legal and justified? If not, to what back

wages, service benefits and relief the above named worker is entitled to from the

concerned management?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 02nd June, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exist between Smt. Kalan Devi W/O Sh. Beli Ram, Village-

Bhawana, PO Jarol, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/s The Divisional Forest Officer,

Suket Forest Division Sundar Nagar, Distt. Mandi, H.P.

5139

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted

under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether verbal termination of the services of Smt. Kalan Devi W/O Sh. Beli Ram,

daily wage workman by the The Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division

Sundar Nagar, Distt. Mandi w.e.f. 06.9.2009 without serving notice, without holding

enquiry and without following the provision of the Industrial disputes Act, 1947, is

legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above

named worker is entitled to from the concerned employer?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 25th June, 2011

No. 11-6/85(Lab) ID/11/Shimla.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute

about the following issue exist between Sh. Manish Kr. Prasad R/O Verma Niwas, Flat No.-2,

Opposite Block No. 27, Sector-III, New Shimla, H.P. Vs. i) Head (HR), Development Alternative

Group, B-32, Tara Cresent Qutab, Institutional Area, New Delhi 110016. ii) The Vice President/

Manager, Development Alternative Group, Set No. 4, Block 6, Phase III, New Shimla, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether Sh. Manish Kr. Prasad, Programme Executive, is a workman as per

provisions of section 2 (s) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947?

5140

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

‘’If yes,“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Manish Kr. Prasad w.e.f.

30.11.2009, who was employed on contract as Programme Executive, for a period of

one year, by the Head (HR),Development Alternative Group, B-32, Tara Cresent

Qutab, Institutional Area, New Delhi110016 ii) The Vice President/Manager,

Development Alternative Group, Set No. 4, Block 6,Phase III, New Shimla, H.P., after

completion of 3 month service, without serving notice, withoutholding enquiry and

without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legaland

justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits & relief Sh. Manish Kr. Prasad

isentitled to from the concerned management?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 22nd June, 2011

No. 11-2/86(Lab) ID/2011/Bilaspur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exist between Miss Neena Kumari D/O Sh. Sita Ram, R/O

Village-Badyat, P.O. & Tehsil Sadar, Dist. Bilaspur, H.P. V/s i) The Regional Project Director,

Mid Himalyan Watershed Development Project, Lakhanpur, Distt. Bilaspur, H.P. ii) The Divisional

Watershed Development Officer, Bahadurpur Watershed Division at Namhol, Distt. Bilaspur, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted

under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether verbal termination of the service of Miss Neena Kumari D/O Sh. Sita Ram,

Daily Wage Data Entry Operator/Social Mobilizer by the The Divisional Watershed

Development Officer, Bahadurpur Watershed Division at Namhol, Distt. Bilaspur,

(H.P.) w.e.f. 06.2.2010 without following the provision of the Industrial Disputes Act,

1947 and retaining junior workmen as alleged by worker, is legal nad justified? If not,

to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named worker is entitled to

from the concerned employer?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

5141

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 22nd June, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Prem Singh S/O Sh. Achhar Singh, Village

Sundal, P.O. Tor Jajar (Mandap), Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/s The Executive Engineer,

HPPWD Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted

under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“ Whether plea of the employer i.e. Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division,

Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi that services of the Sh. Prem Singh S/O Sh.

Achhar Singh has not been terminated but he has abandoned the services w.e.f.

29.5.2006 is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief

the above named workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 2nd June, 2011

No. 11-2/95(lab) ID/Kinnour.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute

about the following issue exist between Sh. Sami Ram C/O CITU Office, Near Distt. Hospital

Reckongpeo, Distt. Kinnour, H.P. V/s The General manager, M/S SCL Infratech Ltd. Tidong

Hydro Electric Project, Kinnour, Distt. Kinnour, H. P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

5142

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under

Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Sami Ram (Welder) C/O CITU Office

Near Distt. Hospital Reckongpeo, Distt. Kinnour, H.P. by the management of M/s SCL

Infratech Ltd. Tidong Hydro Electric Project. Kinnour, Distt. Kinnour, H.P. w.e.f.

13.4.2010 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as

alleged by the above named workman is legal and justified? If not, to what back

wages, service benefits and relief the above named worker is entitled to from the

concerned management?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 27th June, 2011

No. 11-1/85(Lab) I.D/2011-Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Chaman Lal S/O Shri Prithi Chand R/O

Village & P.O. Deol, Tehsil Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P. Vs. (1) The Managing Director, M/S

Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, No.-532, 1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd

Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General Manager, M/S Subhash Project and

Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel T.Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur,

District Kangra, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla / Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether the termination of the services of Shri Chaman Lal S/O Shri Prithi Chand

Senior Field Attendant by (1) The Managing Director, M/S Subhash Project and

Marketing Limited, No.-532, 1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd Stage, Indra

Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General Manager, M/S Subhash Project and

Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel T.Bud, Bandla Tea Estate

Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 30-03-2010 vide letter dated 30-03-2010

without serving charge sheet, without holding enquiry and without complying with the

provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, to what

back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman is entitled to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

5143

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 8th June, 2011

No. 11-2/95(Lab) I.D/2011-Kinnaur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Chhering Butit W/O Shri Chhering Chhutup

R/O Village & P.O. Hikkam, Tehsil Kaza, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P. Vs. The Executive

Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Kaza, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether the verbal termination of services of Smt. Chhering Butit W/O Shri

Chhering Chhutup daily wage worker by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division,

Kaza, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P. w.e.f. October, 2009 without serving notice,

without holding enquiry and without complying with the provisions of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947, whereas persons junior to her have been retained by the employer,

as alleged by the worker, is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service

benefits and relief the above named worker is entitled to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 4th June, 2011

No. 11-2/95(Lab) I.D/2011-Kinnaur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Chhering Dolma W/O Shri Dorje Chhering

R/O Village Langcha, P.O. Hikkam, Tehsil Spiti, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P. Vs. The Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Spiti Division, Kaza, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

5144

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether the verbal termination of services of Smt. Chhering Dolma W/O Shri Dorje

Chhering daily wage worker by the Executive Engineer, H. P. P.W.D. Spiti Division,

Kaza, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P. w.e.f. September/October, 2009 without serving

notice, without holding enquiry and without complying with the provisions of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, whereas persons junior to her have been retained by the

employer, as alleged by the worker, is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages,

service benefits and relief the above named worker is entitled to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 8th June, 2011

No. 11-2/95(Lab) I.D/2011-Kinnaur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue existsbetween Smt. Chhering Dolma W/O Shri Sonam Tashi R/O

Village & P.O. Kaza, Tehsil Kaza, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,

I.&P.H. Division, Kaza, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether the verbal termination of services of Smt. Chhering Dolma W/O Shri Sonam

Tashi daily wage worker by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Kaza, District Lahaul &

Spiti, H.P. w.e.f. 01-11-2009 without serving notice, without holding enquiry and without

complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, whereas persons junior to her

have been retained by the employer, as alleged by the worker, is legal and justified? If not, to what

back wages, service benefits and relief the above named worker is entitled to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

5145

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 4th June, 2011

No. 11-2/95(Lab) I.D/2011-Kinnaur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Chhewang Lamo W/O Shri Nawang Zinpa

R/O Village & P.O. Kaza, Tehsil Spiti, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. Spiti Division, Kaza, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla / Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether the verbal termination of services of Smt. Chhewang Lamo W/O Shri Nawang

Zinpa daily wage worker by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Spiti Division, Kaza, District

Lahaul & Spiti, H.P. w.e.f. September/October, 2009 without serving notice, without holding

enquiry and without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, whereas

persons junior to her have been retained by the employer, as alleged by the worker, is legal and

justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named worker is entitled

to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 29th June, 2011

No. 11-1/85(Lab) I.D/2011-Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Jaswant Kumar S/O Shri Karam Chand R/O

Village & P.O. Deol, Tehsil Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P. Vs. (1) The Managing Director, M/S

Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, No.-532, 1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd

Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General Manager, M/S Subhash Project and

Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel T.Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur,

District Kangra, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

5146

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/ Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether the termination of the services of Shri Jaswant Kumar S/O Shri Karam Chand

Batching Plant Operator by (1) The Managing Director, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing

Limited, No.-532, 1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore,

560038 (2) The General Manager, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, House No.-4,

Ward No.-1, Near Hotel T.Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f.

30-03-2010 vide letter dated 30-03-2010 without serving charge sheet, without holding enquiry and

without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified?

If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named Batching Plant Operator is

entitled to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 30th June, 2011

No. 11-1/85(Lab) I.D/2011-Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Jeet Ram S/O Shri Achhar Singh R/O Village

& P.O. Deol, Tehsil Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P. Vs. (1) The Managing Director, M/S Subhash

Project and Marketing Limited, No.-532, 1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd Stage, Indra

Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General Manager, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited,

House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel T. Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur, District Kangra, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether the termination of the services of Shri Jeet Ram S/O Shri Achhar Singh Field

Attendant by (1) The Managing Director, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, No.-532,

1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General

Manager, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel

5147

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

T. Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 30-03-2010 vide letter dated

30-03-2010 without serving charge sheet, without holding enquiry and without complying with the

provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages,

service benefits and relief the above named Field Attendant is entitled to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 3rd June, 2011

No. 11-2/95(Lab) I.D/2011-Kinnaur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Labu Chhering S/O Shri Angroop Thuktan

R/O Village Langcha, P.O. Hikkam, Tehsil Spiti, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P. Vs. The Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Spiti Division, Kaza, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/ Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether the verbal termination of services of Shri Labu Chhering S/O Shri Angroop

Thuktan daily wages workman by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Spiti Division, Kaza,

District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P. w.e.f. September, 2009 without serving notice, without holding

enquiry and without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, whereas

persons junior to him have been retained by the employer, as alleged by the workman, is legal and

justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman is

entitled to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 27th June, 2011

No. 11-1/85(Lab) I.D/2011-Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Madan Lal S/O Shri Roshan Lal R/O Village

5148

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

Bharer, P.O. Deol, Tehsil Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P. Vs. (1) The Managing Director, M/S

Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, No.-532, 1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd

Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General Manager, M/S Subhash Project and

Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel T.Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur,

District Kangra, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vestedunder Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/ Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether the termination of the services of Shri Madan Lal S/O Shri Roshan Lal Field

Attendant by (1) The Managing Director, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, No.-532,

1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General

Manager, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel

T.Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 30-03-2010 vide letter dated

30-03-2010 without serving charge sheet, without holding enquiry and without complying with the

provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages,

service benefits and relief the above named workman is entitled to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 13th June, 2011

No. 11-1/86(Lab) I.D/2011-Nahan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Mahima Chand S/O Shri Tota Ram R/O

Village Ghaina, P.O. Rama, Tehsil Nahan, District Sirmour, H.P. Vs. The Collector Forest

Settlement Solan and Sirmour at Nahan, District Sirmour, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that thi

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/ Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

5149

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

“Whether the verbal termination of services of Shri Mahima Chand S/O Shri Tota Ram

chainman by the Collector Forest Settlement Solan and Sirmour at Nahan, District Sirmour, H.P.

w.e.f. Year, 2007 without serving notice, without holding enquiry and without complying with the

provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, whereas persons junior to him have been retained

by the employer, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages,

service benefits and relief the above named workman is entitled to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 4th June, 2011

No. 11-2/95(Lab) I.D/2011-Kinnaur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Nawang Namgial S/O Shri Panma Namgial

R/O Village Langcha, P.O. Hikkam, Tehsil Spiti, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P. Vs. The Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Spiti Division, Kaza, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/ Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether the verbal termination of services of Shri Nawang Namgial S/O Shri Panma

Namgial daily wages workman by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Spiti Division, Kaza,

District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P. w.e.f. October, 2009 without serving notice, without holding enquiry

and without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, whereas persons

junior to him have been retained by the employer, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified?

If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman is entitled to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

5150

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, July, 2011

No. 11-1/85(Lab) I.D/2011-Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Om Parkash S/O Shri Hirda Ram R/O Village

and P.O. Deol, Tehsil Baijanth, District Kangra, H.P. Vs. (1) The Managing Director, M/S Subhash

Project and Marketing Limited, No.-532, 1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd Stage, Indra

Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General Manager, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited,

House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel T. Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur, District Kangra, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is requiredto be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether the termination of the services of Shri Om Parkash S/O Shri Hirda Ram Grade

Unskilled by (1) The Managing Director, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, No.-532,

1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General

Manager, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel T.

Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 30-03-2010 vide letter dated

30-03-2010 without serving charge sheet, without holding enquiry and without complying with the

provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages,

service benefits and relief the above named Grade Unskilled is entitled to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 8th June, 2011

No. 11-2/95(Lab) I.D/2011-Kinnaur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Padma Dolkar W/O Shri Nawang Lotey R/O

Village & P.O. Kaza, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division,

Kaza, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

5151

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/ Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether the verbal termination of services of Smt. Padma Dolkar W/O Shri Nawang Lotey

daily wage worker by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Kaza, District Lahaul & Spiti,

H.P. w.e.f. 01-11-2009 without serving notice, without holding enquiry and without complying

with theprovisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, whereas persons junior to her have been

retained by the employer, as alleged by the worker, is legal and justified? If not, to what back

wages, service benefits and relief the above named worker is entitled to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 30th June, 2011

No. 11-1/85(Lab) I.D/2011-Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Pappu Ram S/O Shri Prem Chand R/O

Village and P.O. Deol, Tehsil Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P. Vs. (1) The Managing Director, M/S

Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, No.-532, 1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd

Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General Manager, M/S Subhash Project and

Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel T. Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur,

District Kangra, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is requiredto be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether the termination of the services of Shri Pappu Ram S/O Shri Prem Chand Pump

Operator by (1) The Managing Director, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, No.-532, 1st

Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General

Manager, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel T.

Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 30-03-2010 vide letter dated 30-03-

2010 without serving charge sheet, without holding enquiry and without complying with the

provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages,

service benefits and relief the above named Pump Operator is entitled to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

5152

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 29th June, 2011

No. 11-1/85(Lab) I.D/2011-Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Partap Chand S/O Shri Dumnu Ram R/O

Village and P.O. Deol, Tehsil Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P. Vs. (1) The Managing Director, M/S

Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, No.-532, 1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd

Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General Manager, M/S Subhash Project and

Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel T. Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur,

District Kangra, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/ Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether the termination of the services of Shri Partap Chand S/O Shri Dumnu Ram Field

Attendant by (1) The Managing Director, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, No.-532,

1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General

Manager, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel

T.Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 30-03-2010 vide letter dated

30-03-2010 without serving charge sheet, without holding enquiry and without complying with the

provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages,

service benefits and relief the above named Field Attendant is entitled to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 29th June, 2011

No. 11-1/85(Lab) I.D/2011-Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Pyar Chand S/O Shri Prem Chand R/O

Village & P.O. Deol, Tehsil Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P. Vs. (1) The Managing Director, M/S

Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, No.-532, 1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd

Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General Manager, M/S Subhash Project and

Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel T. Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur,

District Kangra, H.P.

5153

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether the termination of the services of Shri Pyar Chand S/O Shri Prem Chand Filed

Attendant by (1) The Managing Director, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, No.-532,

1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General

Manager, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel

T.Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 30-03-2010 vide letter dated

30-03-2010 without serving charge sheet, without holding enquiry and without complying with the

provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legaland justified? If not, to what back wages,

service benefits and relief the above named Field Attendant is entitled to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 27th June, 2011

No. 11-1/85(Lab) I.D/2011-Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Raj Kumar S/O Shri Nikku Ram R/O Village

& P.O. Deol, Tehsil Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P. Vs. (1) The Managing Director, M/S Subhash

Project and Marketing Limited, No.-532, 1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd Stage, Indra

Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General Manager, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited,

House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel T.Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur,

District Kangra, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/ Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

5154

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

“Whether the termination of the services of Shri Raj Kumar S/O Shri Nikku Ram Batching

Plant Operator by (1) The Managing Director, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, No.-

532, 1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The

General Manager, M/SSubhash Project and Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near

Hotel T.Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 30-03-2010 vide letter dated

30-03-2010 without serving charge sheet, without holding enquiry and without complying with the

provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages,

service benefits and relief the above named workman is entitled to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 27th June, 2011

No. 11-1/85(Lab) I.D/2011-Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Rakesh Kumar S/O Shri Chokas Ram R/O

Village & P.O. Deol, Tehsil Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P. Vs. (1) The Managing Director, M/S

Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, No.-532, 1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd

Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General Manager, M/S Subhash Project and

Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel T.Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur,

District Kangra, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial disputeis referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla / Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether the termination of the services of Shri Rakesh Kumar S/O Shri Chokas Ram Field

Attendant by (1) The Managing Director, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, No.-532,

1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General

Manager, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel

T.Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 30-03-2010 vide letter dated

30-03-2010 without serving charge sheet, without holding enquiry and without complying with the

provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages,

service benefits and relief the above named workman is entitled to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

5155

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, July, 2011

No. 11-1/85(Lab) I.D/2011-Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Sanjay Kumar S/O Shri Krishan Chand R/O

Village Dhandhera, P.O. Kachhera, Tehsil Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P. Vs. (1) The Managing

Director, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, No.-532, 1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th

Cross, 2nd Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General Manager, M/S Subhash Project

and Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel T. Bud, Bandla Tea Estate

Palampur, District Kangra, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla / Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether the termination of the services of Shri Sanjay Kumar S/O Shri Krishan Chand

Senior Field Attendant by (1) The Managing Director, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing

Limited, No.-532, 1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore,

560038 (2) The General Manager,M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward

No.-1, Near Hotel T. Bud, Bandla TeaEstate Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 30-03-2010

vide letter dated 30-03-2010 without servingcharge sheet, without holding enquiry and without

complying with the provisions of the IndustrialDisputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, to

what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named Senior Field Attendant is entitled

to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 27th June, 2011

No. 11-1/85(Lab) I.D/2011-Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Sanjeev Kumar S/O Shri Punjaba Ram R/O

Village & P.O. Deol, Tehsil Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P. Vs. (1) The Managing Director, M/S

Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, No.-532, 1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd

Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General Manager, M/S Subhash Project and

Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel T.Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur,

District Kangra, H.P.

5156

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/ Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether the termination of the services of Shri Sanjeev Kumar S/O Shri Punjaba Ram

Senior Field Attendant by (1) The Managing Director, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing

Limited, No.-532, 1stFloor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore, 560038

(2) The General Manager,M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward No.-1,

Near Hotel T.Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 30-03-2010 vide letter

dated 30-03-2010 without serving charge sheet, without holding enquiry and without complying

with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, to what back

wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman is entitled to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 2th June, 2011

No. 11-1/86(Lab) I.D/2011-Nahan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Santosh Kumar S/O Shri Gaddi Lal R/O

Village Paffari, District Hamirpur, H.P. Vs. The Managing Director, M/S Shivalik Containers

Private Limited, Unit-II, Plot No.-7, Industrial Area, Phase-II, Kala-Amb, District Sirmour, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/ Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether the verbal termination of services of Shri Santosh Kumar S/O Shri Gaddi Lal

operator by the management of M/s Shivalik Containers Private Limited, Unit-II, Plot No.-7,

Industrial Area, Phase-II, Kala-Amb, District Sirmour, H.P. w.e.f. July, 2010 without serving

charge sheet, without holding enquiry and without complying with the provisions of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the worker is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages,

service benefits and relief the above named worker is entitled to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

5157

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 21st June, 2011

No. 11-2/95(Lab) I.D/2011-Kinnaur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Sonam Butith D/O Shri Angrup Thuktan R/O

Village Langcha, P.O. Hikkam, Tehsil Spiti, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P. Vs. The Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Spiti Division, Kaza, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/ Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether the verbal termination of services of Smt. Sonam Butith D/O Shri Angrup

Thuktan daily wage worker by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Spiti Division, Kaza, District

Lahaul & Spiti, H.P. w.e.f. October, 2008 without serving notice, without holding enquiry and

without complyingwith the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, whereas persons junior

to her have been retained by the employer, as alleged by the worker, is legal and justified? If not, to

what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named worker is entitled to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 8th June, 2011

No. 11-2/95(Lab) I.D/2011-Kinnaur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Sonam Chhodon W/O Shri Tanpa Chhering

R/O Village Sichling, P.O. Dhankar, Tehsil Spiti, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P. Vs. The Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Spiti Division, Kaza, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

5158

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/ Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether the verbal termination of services of Smt. Sonam Chhodon W/O Shri Tanpa

Chhering daily wage worker by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Spiti Division, Kaza, District

Lahaul & Spiti, H.P. w.e.f. September, 2009 without serving notice, without holding enquiry and

without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, whereas persons junior

to her have been retained by the employer, as alleged by the worker, is legal and justified? If not, to

what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named worker is entitled to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, July, 2011

No. 11-1/85(Lab) I.D/2011-Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Subhash Chand S/O Shri Ajit Singh R/O

Village and P.O. Deol, Tehsil Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P. Vs. (1) The Managing Director, M/S

Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, No.-532, 1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd

Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General Manager, M/S Subhash Project and

Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel T. Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur,

District Kangra, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is requiredto be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla / Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether the termination of the services of Shri Subhash Chand S/O Shri Ajit Singh Field

Attendant by (1) The Managing Director, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, No.-532,

1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General

Manager, M/S SubhashProject and Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel T.

Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 30-03-2010 vide letter dated 30-03-

2010 without serving charge sheet, without holding enquiry and without complying with the

provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages,

service benefits and relief the above named Field Attendant is entitled to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

5159

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 27th June, 2011

No. 11-6/85(Lab) I.D/2011-Shimla.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Tek Singh S/O Shri Lachhmi Dass R/O

Village Panehra, P.O. Chaba, Tehsil Sunni, District Shimla, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,

H.P.S.E.B. Electrical Division, Sunni, Tehsil Sunni, District Shimla, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/ Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether the verbal termination of services of Shri Tek Singh S/O Shri Lachhmi Dass daily

wage beldar by the Executive Engineer, H.P.S.E.B. Electrical Division, Sunni, Tehsil Sunni,

District Shimla, H.P. w.e.f. 21-03-1998 (Dispute referred keeping in view the order dated

09-01-2006 of Himachal Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal Shimla in O.A. 1808/1999 filed by

the above namedworker) without serving notice, without holding enquiry and without complying

with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, whereas persons junior to him have been

retained by the employer, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, to what wages,

service benefits and relief the above named workman is entitled to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 29th June, 2011

No. 11-1/85(Lab) I.D/2011-Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Trilok Chand S/o Shri Saraf Ram R/O Village

Jamuratpur, P.O. Deol, Tehsil Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P. Vs. (1) The Managing Director, M/S

Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, No.-532, 1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd

Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General Manager, M/S Subhash Project and

Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel T.Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur,

District Kangra, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

5160

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Actibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether the termination of the services of Shri Trilok Chand S/O Shri Saraf Ram Field

Attendant by (1) The Managing Director, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, No.-532,

1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General

Manager, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel

T.Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 30-03-2010 vide letter dated

30-03-2010 without serving charge sheet, without holding enquiry and without complying with the

provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages,

service benefits and relief the above named Field Attendant is entitled to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 29th June, 2011

No. 11-1/85(Lab) I.D/2011-Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Uttam Chand S/O Shri Shakti Chand R/O

Village & P.O. Deol, Tehsil Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P. Vs. (1) The Managing Director, M/S

Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, No.-532, 1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd

Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General Manager, M/S Subhash Project and

Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel T. Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur,

District Kangra, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla / Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether the termination of the services of Shri Uttam Chand S/O Shri Shakti Chand Field

Attendant by (1) The Managing Director, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, No.-532,

1st Floor, 2nd Main Road, 16th Cross, 2nd Stage, Indra Nagar, Banglore, 560038 (2) The General

5161

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

Manager, M/S Subhash Project and Marketing Limited, House No.-4, Ward No.-1, Near Hotel T.

Bud, Bandla Tea Estate Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 30-03-2010 vide letter dated

30-03-2010 without serving charge sheet, without holding enquiry and without complying with the

provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages,

service benefits and relief the above named Field Attendant is entitled to?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 8th August, 2011

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2009/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Arun Kumar S/O Sh. Dev Brat Sharma Jagdish

R/O Village- Bhatoli, P.O. Bathri, Tehsil Dalhousie, Distt. Chamba, H.P. V/s The Executive

Engineer, IPH Division Dalhousie, Distt. Chamba,(H.P.).

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted

under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Arun Kumar S/O Sh. Dev Brat Sharma, R/O

Village- Bhatoli, P.O. Bathri, Tehsil Dalhousie, Distt. Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,

IPH Division Dalhousie, Distt. Chamba, (H.P.) w.e.f. 01.10.1998 is proper and justified, if not,

what amount of back wages, seniority, pastservice benefits and compensation the above workman

is entitled to from the above employer?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 17th August, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/09/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute

about the following issue exist between Sh. Bablu Ram S/O Sh. Mast Ram, Village- Hiyun Jandwl,

PO-Hiyun, Tehsil-Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division

Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.

5162

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted

under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Sh. Bablu Ram S/O Sh. Mast Ram, Village-

Hiyun Jandwl, PO-Hiyun, Tehsil-Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD

Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi w.e.f. 08.7.2005 as mason, without following

the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of

back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above Ex-Worker is entitled to

from the above employer?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 18th August, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/11/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute

about the following issue exist between Smt. Brahmi Devi W/O Sh. Bidhi Chand, Village-

Sanhali, P.O. Tulah, Tehsil Joginder Nagar, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Divisional Forest Officer,

Joginder Nagar, Distt. Mandi , H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted

under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether termination of the services of Smt. Brahmi Devi W/O Sh. Bidhi Chand, Village-

Sanhali, P.O. Tulah, Tehsil Joginder Nagar, Distt. Mandi, H.P. by The Divisional Forest Officer,

Joginder Nagar, Distt. Mandi w.e.f. August, 2009 without complying with the provisions of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority,

past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer ?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

5163

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

FOOD CIVIL SUPPLIES & CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, 17^th January, 2012

No. FDS-F(10)8/2006.—In partial modification of this Department notification of even

number dated 11.12.2008 and 22.7.2009, regarding the constitution of Flying Squad, the same is

modified to the extent of following substitutions with immediate effect:-

In North Zone, comprising District Kangra, Chamba (except Pangi Sub-division)

Una and Hamirpur.

1.

Food and Supplies Officer, O/O District Controller (FCS&CA) Kangra at

Dharamshala in place of Food & Supply Officer, Zonal Office, Dharamshala.

2.

Inspector, Food and Supplies, Dehra in place of Inspector (F&S) Pragpur.

By order,

Sd/-

Pr. Secretary (FCS&CA).

________

lkekftd U;k; ,oa vf/kdkfjrk foHkkx

vf/klwpuk

f”keyk&2] 16 tuojh] 2012

la[;k MCy;w ,y ,Q&,¼3½ 7@96&II-&fgekpy izns”k dh jkT;iky] Hkkjr ds lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn

309 ds ijUrqd }kjk iznRr “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] fgekpy izns”k yksd lsok vk;ksx ds ijke”kZ ls]

bl foHkkx dh vf/klwpuk la[;k% MCy;w ,y ,Q&,¼3½ 7@96 rkjh[k 4-6-2007 }kjk vf/klwfpr] fgekpy

izns”k lkekftd U;k; ,oa vf/kdkfjrk foHkkx] cky fodkl ifj;kstuk vf/kdkjh] oxZ&II ¼jktif=r½ HkrhZ

vkSj izksUufr fu;e] 2007 esa vkSj la”kks/ku djus ds fy, fuEufyf[kr fu;e cukrh gSa] vFkkZr~ %&

1-

laf{kIr uke vkSj izkjEHk-& ¼1½ bu fu;eksa dk laf{kIr uke] fgekpy izns”k lkekftd U;k;

,oa vf/kdkfjrk foHkkx] cky fodkl ifj;kstuk vf/kdkjh] oxZ&II¼jktif=r½ HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr ¼izFke

la”kks/ku½ fu;e] 2012 gSA

¼2½

;s fu;e jkti=] fgekpy izns”k esa izdkf”kr fd, tkus dh rkjh[k ls izo`Ùk gksaxsA

2-

mikcU/k Þdß dk la”kks/ku-&¼1½ fgekpy izns”k] lkekftd U;k; ,oa vf/kdkfjrk foHkkx]

cky fodkl ifj;kstuk vf/kdkjh] oxZ&II ¼jktif=r½] HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;e] 2007 ds mikcU/k&Þdß esa ¼1½

LrEHk la[;k&10 ds lkeus fo|eku micU/kksa ds LFkku ij fuEufyf[kr j[kk tk,xk] vFkkZr~ %&

Þ¼i½

uCcs izfr”kr izksUufr }kjk ,slk u gksus ij lh/kh HkrhZ }kjk A

¼ii½

nl izfr”kr lh/kh HkrhZ }kjk ;k lafonk ds vk/kkj ij AÞ

¼2½

LrEHk la[;k 11 ds lkeus fo|eku eq[; micU/kksa ds LFkku ij fuEufyf[kr j[kk tk,xk]

vFkkZr~ %&

5164

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

^^¼i½ iPphl izfr”kr lgk;d cky fodkl ifj;kstuk vf/kdkfj;ksa esa ls izksUufr }kjk]

ftudk ikap o’kZ dk fu;fer lsokdky ;k xzsM esa dh xbZ yxkrkj rnFkZ lsok ;fn

dksbZ gks] dks lfEefyr djds ikap o’kZ dk fu;fer lsokdky gksA

¼ii½

chl izfr”kr rglhy dY;k.k vf/kdkfj;ksa esa ls izksUufr }kjk] ftudk de ls de

ikap o’kZ dk fu;fer lsokdky ;k xzsM esa dh xbZ yxkrkj rnFkZ lsok ;fn dksbZ gks]

dks lfEefyr djds ikap o’kZ dk fu;fer lsok dky gksA

¼iii½

chl izfr”kr lkaf[;dh lgk;dksa esa ls izksUufr }kjk ftudk de ls de ikap o’kZ

dk fu;fer lsokdky ;k xszM esa dh xbZ yxkrkj rnFkZ lsok lfgr ;fn dksbZ gks]

dks lfEefyr djds ikap o’kZ dk fu;efr lsok dky gksA

¼iv½

iPphl izfr”kr ofj’B lgk;dksa esa ls izksUufr }kjk ftudk de ls de ckjg o’kZ

dk fu;fer lsokdky ;k xszM esa dh xbZ yxkrkj rnFkZ lsok] ;fn dksbZ gks] dks

lfEefyr djds ckjg o’kZ dk fu;fer lsokdky gksA

inksa dks Hkjus ds fy, fuEufyf[kr jksLVj ykxw gksxk %&

igyk] pkSFkk] lkroka X;kjgoka l=goka

lgk;d cky fodkl ifj;kstuk vf/kdkjh

ikapok] uOoka] ckjgoka] mUUkhloka

rglhy dY;k.k vf/kdkjh

rhljk] NBoka] nloka] ianzgoka

lkaf[;dh lgk;d

nwljk] vkBoka] rsjgoka] lksygoka] vBkjgoka

ofj’B lgk;d

pkSngoka] ,oa chloka

lh/kh HkrhZ }kjk A**

vkns”k }kjk]

gLrk{kfjr@&

iz/kku lfpo ¼lkekftd U;k; ,oa vf/kdkfjrk foHkkx½A

&&&&&&&

[Authoritative English Text of this department notification No. WLF-A(3)-7/96-II dated

16-01-2012 as required under clause (3) of Article 348 of the Constitution of India].

SOCIAL JUSTICE & EMPOWERMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 16 th January, 2012

No. WLF-A(3)-7/96-Vol.-II.—In exercise of the powers conferred by proviso to Article

309 of the Constitution of India, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, in consultation with the H.P.

Public Service Commission is pleased to make the following rules further to amend the Himachal

Pradesh Social Justice & Empowerment, Child Development Project Officer Class-II Gazetted

Recruitment and Promotion Rules 2007 notified vide this Department notification No. WLF-A

(3)-7/96 dated 4-6-2007, namely :—

1.

Short title and Commencement.—(1) These rules may be called the Himachal

Pradesh Social Justice & Empowerment Department, Child Development Project Officer, Class-II

(Gazetted) Recruitment and Promotion ( Ist Amendment) Rules, 2012.

5165

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

(2)

These rules shall come into force from the date of publication in Rajpatra, Himachal

Pradesh.

2.

Amendment of Annexure-A.—(1) In Annexure-A to the Himachal Pradesh Social

Justice & Empowerment Department Child Development Project Officer, Class-II (Gazetted)

Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 200, for the existing provisions against Col.No.10 the following

shall be substituted, namely:-

“ (i)

90% by promotion failing which by Direct Recruitment.

(ii)

10% by direct Recruitment or on contract basis.”;

(2)

For the existing main provisions of Column No. 11 the following shall be substituted

namely :-

“ (i)

25% by promotion from amongst Assistant Child Development Project

Officer having at least 5 years regular service or regular combined with

continuous adhoc service rendered, if any, in the grade.

(ii)

20% by promotion from amongst the Tehsil Welfare Officers having at least

5 years regular service or regular combined with continuous adhoc service

rendered, if any, in the grade.

(iii)

20% by promotion from amongst the Statistical Assistants having at least 5

years regular service or regular combined with continuous adhoc service

rendered, if any, in the grade.

(iv)

25% by promotion from amongst the Senior Assistants having at least 12

years regular service or regular combined with continuous adhoc service,

rendered, if any, in the grade.

The following roster shall be applied for filling up the posts:-

1st , 4th ,7th , 11th , 17^th

ACDPO

5th , 9th , 12th , 19^th

Tehsil Welfare Officer

3rd , 6th, 10th , 15^th

Statistical Assistant

2nd , 8th, 13th, 16th, 18^th

Senior Assistant

14th & 20th

Direct recruitment.”

By order,

Sd/-

Pr. Secretary(SJ&E).

5166

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 tuojh] 2012@27 ikS’k] 1933

fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr