jkti=] fgekpy izns'k
fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr
f”keyk] cq/kokj 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
fgekpy izns'k ljdkj
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 8th June, 2011
No. 11-2/95(Lab) I.D/2011-Kinnaur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Padma Youdon W/O Shri Tanzin Dorje R/O
Village & P.O. Kaza, Tehsil Kaza, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
I.&P.H. Division, Kaza, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
214&jkti=@2012&18&1&2012 ¼5167½
5168
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether the verbal termination of services of Smt. Padma Youdon W/O Shri
Tanzin Dorje daily wage worker by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Kaza,
District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P. w.e.f. 01-11-2009 without serving notice, without
holding enquiry and without complying with the provisions of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947, whereas persons junior to her have been retained by the
employer, as alleged by the worker, is legal and justified? If not, to what back
wages, service benefits and relief the above named worker is entitled to?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENTDEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 21th June, 2011
No. 11-1/86(Lab) I.D/2011-Nahan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Pawan Kumar S/O Shri Phool Singh R/O
House No.-2165/12, Katcha Tank, Nahan, District Sirmour, H.P. Vs. The Collector Forest
Settlement Solan and Sirmour at Nahan, DistrictSirmour, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla / Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether the verbal termination of services of Shri Pawan Kumar S/O Shri Phool
Singh chainman by the Collector Forest Settlement Solan and Sirmour at Nahan,
District Sirmour, H.P. w.e.f. Year, 2005 without serving notice, without holding
enquiry and without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947, whereas persons junior to him have been retained by the employer, as alleged
by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits
and relief the above named workman is entitled to?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5169
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 18th August, 2011
No. 11-2/86(Lab) ID/2008/Bilaspur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Jarnail Singh S/O Sh. Hem Raj, VPO Swail/
Swahan, Tehsil Sh. Naina Devi Ji, Distt. Bilaspsur, H.P V/s The Executive Engineer, HPSEB
Division Bilaspur As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation
proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned
and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has
decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial
Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Jarnail Singh S/O Sh. Hem Raj, VPO
Swail/ Swahan, Tehsil Shri Naina Devi Ji, Distt. Bilaspsur, H.P by The Executive
Engineer, HPSEB Division Bilaspur w.e.f. 26.4.1999, without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what
amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits, the above worker is entitled
to from the above employer?
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 18th August, 2011
No.11-5/99(Lab)ID/Chamba/2011.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exist between Smt. Lachhi Devi W/O Late Sh. Kishan Chand,
Village- Kufa, P.O. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, Distt. Chamba, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer,
HPPWD Division Killar, Tehsil Pangi, Distt. Chamba, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
5170
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Smt. Lachhi Devi W/O Late Sh. Kishan
Chand, Village- Kufa, P.O. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, Distt. Chamba by Executive
Engineer, HPPWD Division Killar, Tehsil Pangi w.e.f. October, 2005 and retaining
the junior workmen, as alleged by worker, is proper and justified? If not, what
amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
aggrieved workman is entitled ?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
________
To
The Labour Commissioner-cum-
Director of Employment, H.P.
Shimla-171002.
Subject: Joining Report.
Sir,
In compliance to the Additional Chief Secretary ( Labour & Employment ) to the Govt. of
H.P. Shimla Notification No. Shram (B)2-4/2005( Estt.), Dated- 29th August, 2011, I have the
honour to submit my joining report for the post of Superintendent Grade-II today on 30.8.2011
( F.N.). This is for your kind information and further necessary action please.
Yours faithfully,
HET RAM.
Dated- 30.8.2011. Superintendent Grade-II.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th August, 2011
No.11-2/93(Lab) ID/2011/Baddi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exist between Sh. Lal Chand S/O Sh. Prem Chand, Village- Gurdaspura,
P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. V/s i) The General Manager, M/s GMP Technical Solutions,
Village Kurawala, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. ii) M/s S.S. Engineer, Near Bus Stand, Baddi,
Distt. Solan, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
5171
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under
Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Lal Chand S/O Sh. Prem Chand,
Village-Gurdaspura, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan by the i) The General Manager,
M/S GMP Technical Solution, Village- Kurawala, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan (
Principal Employer) ii) M/s S.S. Engineers, Near Bus Stand, Baddi, Distt. Solan,
H.P. (Contractor Company) verbally w.e.f. 05.11.2008 is legal and justified? If not,
what amount of back wages, past service benefits and compensation the above
worker is entitled to from above named employers?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th August, 2011
No. 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2011/Baddi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exist between Sh. Naginder Chand S/O Sh. Nek Ram, Village
Gurdaspura, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. V/s i) The General Manager, M/s GMP Technical
Solutions, Village Kurawala, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. ii) M/s S.S. Engineer, Near Bus
Stand, Baddi, Distt. Solan, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under
Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Naginder Chand S/O Sh. Nek Ram,
Village Gurdaspura, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. by the i) The General
Manager, M/S GMP Technical Solution, Village- Kurawala, P.O. Mandhala, Distt.
Solan ( Principal Employer) ii) M/s S.S. Engineers, Near Bus Stand, Baddi, Distt.
Solan, H.P. (Contractor Company) verbally w.e.f. 05.11.2008 is legal and justified?
If not, what amount of back wages, past service benefits and compensation the
above worker is entitled to from above named employers?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5172
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th August, 2011
No.11-2/93(Lab) ID/2011/Baddi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exist between Sh. Rafic S/O Sh. Ram Nath, Village & Post Office
Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. V/s i) The General Manager, M/s GMP Technical Solutions, Village
Kurawala, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. ii) M/s S.S. Engineer, Near Bus Stand, Baddi, Distt.
Solan, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under
Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Rafic S/O Sh. Ram Nath, Village & Post
Office Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. by the i) The General Manager, M/S GMP
Technical Solution, Village- Kurawala, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan,(Principal
Employer) ii) M/s S.S. Engineers, Near Bus Stand, Baddi, Distt. Solan, H.P. (
Contractor Company) verbally w.e.f. 05.11.2008 is legal and justified? If not, what
amount of back wages, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is
entitled to from above named employers?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th August, 2011
No.11-2/93(Lab) ID/2011/Baddi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exist between Sh. Raj Kumar S/O Sh. Chattar Singh, Village Gurdaspura,
P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. V/s i) The General Manager, M/s GMP Technical Solutions,
Village Kurawala, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. ii) M/s S.S. Engineer, Near Bus Stand, Baddi,
Distt. Solan, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
5173
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under
Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Raj Kumar S/O Sh. Chattar Singh,
Village Gurdaspura, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. by the i) The General
Manager, M/S GMP Technical Solution, Village- Kurawala, P.O. Mandhala, Distt.
Solan (Principal Employer) ii) M/s S.S. Engineers, Near Bus Stand, Baddi, Distt.
Solan, H.P. ( Contractor) verbally w.e.f. 05.11.2008 is legal and justified? If not,
what amount of back wages, past service benefits and compensation the above
worker is entitled to from above named employers?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 25th August, 2011
No.11-2/93(Lab) ID/2011/Baddi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exist between Sh. Rajesh Kumar S/O Sh. Ram Partap, Village- Bada
Gpdam, P.O. Kherawali, Distt. Panchkula, Haryana. V/s i) The General Manager, M/s GMP
Technical Solutions, Village Kurawala, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. ii) M/s S.S. Engineer,
Near Bus Stand, Baddi, Distt. Solan, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under
Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Rajesh Kumar S/O Sh. Ram Partap,
Village- Bada Gpdam, P.O. Kherawali, Distt. Panchkula, Haryana by i) The General
Manager, M/S GMP Technical Solution, Village- Kurawala, P.O. Mandhala, Distt.
Solan, ( Principal Employer) ii) M/s S.S. Engineers, Near Bus Stand, Baddi, Distt.
Solan, H.P.(Contractor), verbally w.e.f. 05.11.2008 is legal and justified? If not,
what amount of back wages, past service benefits and compensation the above
worker is entitled to from above named employers?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5174
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th August, 2011
No.11-2/93(Lab) ID/2011/Baddi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exist between Sh. Surinder Kumar S/O Sh. Kringu Ram, Village Kharota,
P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. V/s i) The General Manager, M/s GMP Technical Solutions,
Village Kurawala, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. ii) M/s S.S. Engineer, Near Bus Stand, Baddi,
Distt. Solan, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under
Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Surinder Kumar S/O Sh. Kringu Ram,
Village Kharota, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. by i) The General Manager, M/S
GMP Technical Solution, Village- Kurawala, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan (Principal
Employer) ii) M/s S.S. Engineers, Near Bus Stand, Baddi, Distt. Solan, H.P.
(Contractor Company) verbally w.e.f. 05.11.2008 is legal and justified? If not, what
amount of back wages, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is
entitled to from above named employers?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 8th August, 2011
No.11-5/99(Lab) ID/2009/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Surinder Kumar S/O Sh. Dev Raj, Village
Gailla, P.O. Sarol, Tehsil & Distt. Chamba, H.P. V/s Executive Engineer, HPPWD ( B&R)
Division Chamba ( H.P.)
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
5175
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Surinder Kumar S/O Sh. Dev Raj,
Village Gailla, P.O. Sarol, Tehsil & Distt. Chamba by the Executive Engineer,
HPPWD ( B&R) Division Chamba ( H.P.) w.e.f. 12/2004, while retaining junior
workers in service, as alleged by worker, is legal and justified, if not, what amount
of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above workman
is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 12th October, 2011
No.11-2/93(Lab)ID/10/Solan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exist between Smt. Bimla W/O Sh. Mohan Singh, Village Nauni, P.O.
Oachghat, Distt. Solan, (H.P.) V/s i) Hony. Advisor, M/s Sanitation Promotion & Development
Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector-6, Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar,
Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal
Employer).
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under
Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Smt. Bimla W/O Sh. Mohan Singh, Village
Nauni, P.O. Oachghat, Distt. Solan, (H.P.) w.e.f. 29.11.2009 by i) Hony. Advisor,
M/s Sanitation Promotion & Development Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector-6,
Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar
University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal
Employer), however no Registration Certificate and License was respectively
obtained by the Principal Employer & Contractor as provided in The Contract
Labour ( R & A) Act, 1970 and not giving her an opportunity of consideration for
re-employment by the employers from the dates her juniors were allegedly
5176
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
employed, thus in violation of provisions of Section 25-F, 25-G & H of the ibid Act
and further demand to declare her direct employee of the Principal Employer, is
legal and justified, if not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits, compensation and relief the above worker is entitled to from the above
Employers/Management?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 24th October, 2011
No. 11-2/93(Lab)ID/10/Solan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exist between Sh. Manoj Kumar S/O Sh. Chunu Ram, VPO Nauni,
District Solan, (H.P.) V/s i) Hony. Advisor, M/s Sanitation Promotion & Development Society, 5-
B, Pocket-2, Sector-6, Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar, Dr. Y.S.
Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer).
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under
Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Manoj Kumar S/O Sh. Chunu Ram,
VPO Nauni, District Solan, (H.P.) w.e.f. 13.10.2009 by i) Hony. Advisor, M/s
Sanitation Promotion & Development Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector-6, Dwarka,
New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University
of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer),
however no Registration Certificate and License was respectively obtained by the
Principal Employer & Contractor as provided in The Contract Labour (R & A) Act,
1970 and not giving her an opportunity of consideration for reemployment by the
employers from the dates her juniors were allegedly employed, thus in violation of
provisions of Section 25-F, 25-G & H of the ibid Act and further demand to declare
her direct employee of the Principal Employer, is legal and justified, if not, what
amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits, compensation and relief the
above worker is entitled to from the above Employers/Management?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5177
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 24th October, 2011
No.11-2/93(Lab)ID/10/Solan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exist between Smt. Nirmala Devi W/O Sh. Pritam Singh, Near Congress
Bhawan, Saproon, Distt. Solan, (H.P.) V/s i) Hony. Advisor, M/s Sanitation Promotion &
Development Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector-6, Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii)
The Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P.
(Principal Employer).
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under
Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Smt. Nirmala Devi W/O Sh. Pritam Singh,
Near Congress Bhawan, Saproon, Distt. Solan, (H.P.) w.e.f. 13.10.2009 by i) Hony.
Advisor, M/s Sanitation Promotion & Development Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector-
6, Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar
University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal
Employer), however no Registration Certificate and License was respectively
obtained by the Principal Employer & Contractor as provided in The Contract
Labour ( R & A) Act, 1970 and not giving her an opportunity of consideration for
re-employment by the employers from the dates her juniors were allegedly
employed, thus in violation of provisions of Section 25-F, 25-G & H of the ibid Act
and further demand to declare her direct employee of the Principal Employer, is
legal and justified, if not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits, compensation and relief the above worker is entitled to from the above
Employers/Management?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 24th October, 2011
No. 11-2/93(Lab)ID/10/Solan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exist between Sh. Palak Ram S/O Sh. Prem Dutt R/O Village Danal, P.O.
5178
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
Panawa, District Sirmour, (H.P.) V/s i) Hony. Advisor, M/s Sanitation Promotion & Development
Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector-6, Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar,
Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal
Employer).
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under
Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Palak Ram S/O Sh. Prem Dutt R/O
Village Danal, P.O. Panawa, District Sirmour, (H.P.) w.e.f. 28.11.2009 by i) Hony.
Advisor, M/s Sanitation Promotion & Development Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector-
6, Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar
University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal
Employer), however no Registration Certificate and License was respectively
obtained by the Principal Employer & Contractor as provided in The Contract
Labour ( R & A) Act, 1970 and not giving her an opportunity of consideration for
re-employment by the employers from the dates her juniors were allegedly
employed, thus in violation of provisions of Section 25-F, 25-G & H of the ibid Act
and further demand to declare her direct employee of the Principal Employer, is
legal and justified, if not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits, compensation and relief the above worker is entitled to from the above
Employers/Management?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 24th October, 2011
No.11-2/93(Lab)ID/Baddi/2011.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exist between Sh. Pradeep Kumar S/O Sh. Gopal Krishan, Village-
Delagi, P.O. Koti, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H.P. V/s The Director Operations, M/S Johnson &
Johnson Ltd. Jharmajari, Tehsil Baddi, Distt. Solan, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
5179
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under
Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
1.
“ Whether termination of the services of Sh. Pradeep Kumar S/O Sh. Gopal Krishan,
Village- Delagi, P.O. Koti, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H.P. w.e.f. 31.8.2010 by the
Factory Manager/ Occupier M/s Johnson & Johnson Ltd. Jharmajari, Tehsil Baddi,
Distt. Solan, H.P after conducting the enquiry, about which above ex-worker has
alleged that same was not fair & justified, is proper and justified? if not, what
amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and relief the above worker is
entitled to from above employer/management?”
2.
“If issue no. I is answered that inquiry was fair & just, in that case, whether the
punishment is proportionate to the misconduct? If not, what relief the above ex-
worker is entitled to from the management?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 5th October, 2011
No.11-1/85(Lab) ID/2010/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exist between Smt. Renu Mehra W/O Late Sh. Dev Raj, Ex-Peon,
R/O Old Chari Road Sudhead, Near Sh. C.L. Mehra Niwas, Dharmsala, Distt. Kangra, H.P. V/s
The Principal, BD DAV Senior Secondary Public School Kotwali Bazar, Dharamsala, Distt.
Kangra (H.P.)
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Smt. Renu Mehra W/O late Sh. Dev Raj, Ex-Peon,
R/O Old Chari Road Sudhead, Near Sh. C.L. Mehra Niwas, Dharmsala, Distt. Kangra, H.P.
as Peon by The Principal, BD DAV Senior Secondary Public School Kotwali Bazar,
Dharamsala, Distt. Kangra (H.P.) w.e.f. 26.9.2009, without issuing charge sheet, without
conducting enquiry and without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits, the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5180
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 24th October, 2011
No.11-2/93(Lab)ID/Baddi/2011.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exist between Sh. Sandeep Kumar S/O Sh. Damodar Dass, Village-
Kodhar, P.OP. Chimhanu, Tehsil Joginder Nagar, Distt. Mandi, H.P V/s The Director Operations,
M/S Johnson & Johnson Ltd. Jharmajari, Tehsil Baddi, Distt. Solan, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under
Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
1.
“ Whether termination of the services of Sh. Sandeep Kumar S/O Sh. Damodar
Dass, Village- Kodhar, P.OP. Chimhanu, Tehsil Joginder Nagar, Distt. Mandi,
(H.P.) w.e.f. 31.8.2010 by the Factory Manager/ Occupier M/s Johnson & Johnson
Ltd. Jharmajari, Tehsil Baddi, Distt. Solan, H.P after conducting the enquiry, about
which above ex-worker has alleged that same was not fair & justified, is proper and
justified? if not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
relief the above worker is entitled to from above employer/ management?”
2.
“If issue no. I is answered that inquiry was fair & just, in that case, whether the
punishment is proportionate to the misconduct? If not, what relief the above ex-
worker is entitled to from the management?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_______
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 24th October, 2011
No.11-2/93(Lab)ID/10/Solan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exist between Smt. Seema W/O Sh, Babloo, R/O Village- Dublu, P.O.
Janedghat, District Shimla (H.P.) V/s i) Hony. Advisor, M/s Sanitation Promotion & Development
Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector-6, Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar,
Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal
Employer).
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
5181
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under
Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Smt. Seema W/O Sh, Babloo, R/O Village- Dublu,
P.O. Janedghat, District Shimla (H.P.) w.e.f. 28.11.2009 by i) Hony. Advisor, M/s
Sanitation Promotion & Development Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector-6, Dwarka, New Delhi
(Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture &
Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer), however no Registration
Certificate and License was respectively obtained by the Principal Employer & Contractor
as provided in The Contract Labour ( R & A) Act, 1970 and not giving her an opportunity
of consideration for re-employment by the employers from the dates her juniors were
allegedly employed, thus in violation of provisions of Section 25-F, 25-G & H of the ibid
Act and further demand to declare her direct employee of the Principal Employer, is legal
and justified, if not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits,
compensation and relief the above worker is entitled to from the above Employers/
Management?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 24th October, 2011
No.11-2/93(Lab)ID/10/Solan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exist between Sh. Santresh W/O Sh. Dalip, R/O VPO Nauni, District
Solan, (H.P.) V/s i) Hony. Advisor, M/s Sanitation Promotion & Development Society, 5-B,
Pocket-2, Sector-6, Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar, Dr. Y.S.
Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry,Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer).
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under
Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
5182
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Santresh W/O Sh. Dalip, R/O VPO Nauni,
District Solan, (H.P.) w.e.f. 13.10.2009 by i) Hony. Advisor, M/s Sanitation Promotion &
Development Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector-6, Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society)
and ii) The Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt.
Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer), however no Registration Certificate and License was
respectively obtained by the Principal Employer & Contractor as provided in The Contract
Labour ( R & A) Act, 1970 and not giving her an opportunity of consideration for
reemployment by the employers from the dates her juniors were allegedly employed, thus in
violation of provisions of Section 25-F, 25-G & H of the ibid Act and further demand to
eclare her direct employee of the Principal Employer, is legal and justified, if not, what
amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits, compensation and relief the above
worker is entitled to from the above Employers/Management?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 12th October, 2011
No.11-1/86(Lab)ID/2011/Nahan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exist between Sh. Sukh Dev S/O Late Sh. Munna Ram, R/O Village
Kotrdi Kanlog, P.O. Rama, Tehsil Nahan, Distt. Sirmour, H.P. V/s i) The Collector Forest
Settlement Solan and Sirmour at Nahan, Distt. Sirmour, H.P. ii) The Assistant Conservator of
Forest, Settlement Solan and Sirmour at Nahan, Distt. Sirmour, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under
Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether the termination of services of Sh. Sukh Dev S/O late Sh. Munna Ram, (Chainman)
R/O Village Kotrdi Kanlog, P.O. Rama, Tehsil Nahan, Distt. Sirmour, H.P. by the (i) The
Collector Forest Settlement Solan and Sirmour at Nahan, Distt. Sirmour, H.P. (ii) The
Assistant Conservator of Forest, Settlement Solan and Sirmour at Nahan, Distt. Sirmour,
(H.P.) from time to time w.e.f. 1998 to 2007 and finally w.e.f. 17.2.2008 without complying
the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, is legal and justified? If not, to what relief of
reinstatement and other service benefits Sh. Sukh Dev workman is entitled to?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5183
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 15th October, 2011
No.11-5/99(Lab) ID/2009/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Tej Singh S/O Sh. Moti Chand R/O Village
Ghisal, P.O. Sach, Tehsil Pangi, Distt. Chamba, H.P. V/s The Executive Engineer, HPPWD
Division Killar (Pangi) Distt. Chamba ( H.P.)
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Tej Singh S/O Sh. Moti Chand R/O Village
Ghisal, P.O. Sach, Tehsil Pangi, Distt. Chamba, H.P. by The Executive Engineer, HPPWD
Division Killar (Pangi), Distt. Chamba, H.P. w.e.f. January, 2002 to July, 2005 and finally
w.e.f. October, 2005 without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits, the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 24th October, 2011
No. 11-2/93(Lab)ID/10/Solan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exist between Smt. Zeerina W/O Sh. Sadhu Ram, Village Degu, P.O.
Narag, Tehsil Pachhad, Distt. Sirmour, (H.P.) V/s i) Hony. Advisor, M/s Sanitation Promotion &
Development Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector-6, Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii)
The Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P.
(Principal Employer).
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
5184
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under
Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Smt. Zeerina W/O Sh. Sadhu Ram, Village Degu,
P.O. Narag, Tehsil Pachhad, Distt. Sirmour, (H.P.) w.e.f. 28.11.2009 by i) Hony. Advisor,
M/s Sanitation Promotion & Development Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector-6, Dwarka, New
Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of
Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer), however no
Registration Certificate and License was respectively obtained by the Principal Employer &
Contractor as provided in The Contract Labour ( R & A) Act, 1970 and not giving her an
opportunity of consideration for re-employment by the employers from the dates her juniors
were allegedly employed, thus in violation of provisions of Section 25-F, 25-G & H of the
ibid Act and further demand to declare her direct employee of the Principal Employer, is
legal and justified, if not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits,
compensation and relief the above worker is entitled to from the above
Employers/Management?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla- 171 002, the 13th January, 2012
No. Shram (B) 1-3/2005-Estt.—The Governor, Himachal Pradesh in exercise of the
powers conferred under section- 8 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act no. 14 of 1947) and in
consultation with the Hon’ble High Court, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to appoint Shri Rajan
Gupta , presently posted as Additional District and Session Judge, Una as Presiding Officer of the
Labour Court- cum-Industrial Tribunal, Kangra at Dharamshala on deputation basis with immediate
effect. The period of deputation will be two years in the first instance.
The deputation period will be governed on usual terms and conditions of deputation as
specified by the Hon’ble High Court vide letter No. HHC/ Admn. 28 (27) 80- 1530 dated 7th
December, 1989 from the Registrar, Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh. The Governor,
Himachal Pradesh is further pleased to relieve Sh. Chirag Bhanu Singh, Presiding Officer, Labour
Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala enabling him to join further assignment.
By order,
Sd/-
Addl. Chief Secretary (Lab. & Emp.) .
5185
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, 18th July, 2011
No. Shram(B)3-1/2006 (Estt.) L.O.—The Governor, Himachal Pradesh on the
recommendations of the Departmental Promotion Committee is pleased to order the promotion of
Sh. Prem Singh, Labour Inspector to the post of Labour Officer, (Class-II, Gazetted) in the pay
scale of Rs. 7000-10980 (Pre-Revised) Rs. 10300-34800+Rs. 4400/- G.P., in the Labour and
Employment Department, Himachal Pradesh, on regular basis in pursuance of Deptt. Of Personnel
instruction’s issued vide letter No. PER(AP)-C-F(1)-1/2009, dated 16th November,2009, in the
public interest.
2.
The Governor, Himachal Pradesh is further pleased to post him as Labour Officer at
Bilaspur against vacancy.
3.
Sh. Prem Singh, on his promotion, shall remain on probation for a period of two
years in the first instance. He shall be entitled to exercise for fixation of pay under the provisions of
F.R.22(1)(a)(i) within one month from the date of receipt of this order.
4.
Sh. Prem Singh is directed to report for duty at his new place of posting within a
fortnight positively. The promotion shall take place on joining at new place of posting. No
extension in joining period will be allowed in any case.
By order,
Sd/-
Addl.Chief Secretary (Lab.& Emp.).
________
yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx
'kqf)i=
f'keyk&2] 17 tuojh] 2012
la[;k ih0ch0MCY;w0&,&ch¼2½&112@1993&I.—bl foHkkx dh le la[;d vf/klwpuk
fnukad 10&01&2012 ds }kjk dfu"B vfHk;Urk ¼fo|qr½ ds HkrhZ ,oa izksUufr fu;e vf/klwfpr fd, x;s FksA
bl vf/klwpuk ds fgUnh laLdj.k esa iSjk 1 ¼i½ ds LFkku ij fuEu i<+k tk;s%&
1-
laf{kIr uke vkSj izkjEHk-&¼i½ bu fu;eksa dk laf{kIr uke fgekpy izns'k yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx]
dfu’B vfHk;Urk ¼fo|qr½ oxZ&III ¼vjktif=r½ HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;e] 2012 gSA
vkns'k }kjk]
gLrk{kfjr@&
iz/kku lfpo ¼yksd fuekZ.k½A
5186
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
cgqmÌs”kh; ifj;kstuk,sa ,oa fo|qr foHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f”keyk] 17 tuojh] 2012
la[;k fo|qr&N% ¼5½&6@2011-&;r% fgekpy izns”k ds jkT;iky dks ;g izrhr gskrk gS fd
fgekpy izns”k jkT; fo|qr ifj’kn~ fyfeVsM] tks fd Hkwfe vtZu vf/kfu;e 1894 ¼1894 dk igyk
vf/kfu;e½ dh /kkjk 3 ds [k.M ¼lh-lh-½ ds vUrxZr ljdkj ds LokfeRo vkSj fu;U=.k ds v/khu ,d fuxe
gS] ds }kjk vius O;; ij lkoZtfud iz;kstu gsrq uked eqgky teVk] rglhy ukgu] ftyk fljekSj]
fgekpy izns”k esa 220 ds0 oh0 ykbZu teVk ls nsouh o 132 ds0 oh0 ykbZu nsouh ls 132@33@11 ds0
oh0 lc&LVs”ku ¼tksgMks½ dkykvkEc ds fuekZ.k gsrq Hkwfe vftZr djuh vfr vko”;d visf{kr gS vr,o
,rn~}kjk ;g vf/klwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd mDr ifj{ks= esa tSlk fd fuEu fooj.kh esa fufnZ’V fd;k x;k gS
mijksDr iz;kstu ds fy, Hkwfe dk vtZu visf{kr gSA
2-
;g vf/klwpuk ,sls lHkh O;fDr;ksa dks tks blls lEcfU/kr gSa ;k gks ldrs gSa dh tkudkjh
ds fy, Hkw&vtZu vf/kfu;e] 1894 dh /kkjk&4 ds micU/kksa ds vUrxZr tkjh dh tkrh gSA
3-
iwoksZDr /kkjk }kjk iznRr “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, jkT;iky] fgekpy izns”k bl le;
bl midze esa dk;Zjr lHkh vf/kdkfj;ksa muds deZpkfj;ksa vkSj Jfedksa dks bykds dh fdlh Hkh Hkwfe esa izos”k
djus vkSj losZ{k.k djus vkSj ml /kkjk }kjk visf{kr vFkok vuqer% lHkh vU; dk;ksZa dks djus ds fy, lg’kZ
izkf/kdkj nsrs gSaA
4-
vR;f/kd vko”;drk dks n`f’V esa j[krs gq, jkT;iky] fgekpy izns”k mDr vf/kfu;e dh
/kkjk 17 dh mi /kkjk ¼4½ ds v/khu ;g Hkh funsZ”k nsrs gS fd mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk& 5, ds micU/k bl
ekeys es ykxw ugh gksaxsA
5-
Hkwfe ls lEcfU/kr js[kkad dk fujh{k.k dk;kZy; Hkw&vtZu lekgrkZ] fgekpy izns”k jkT;
fo|qr ifj’kn~ fyfeVsM] mRre Hkou] f”keyk&4 esa fd;k tk ldrk gSaA
fooj.kh
ftyk
rglhy
xzke
[kljk uEcj
jdck ¼ch/kks esa½
fljekSj
ukgu
teVk
753@57@1
0&2
645@518@37@1
0&4
dqy fdRrk&2
dqy jdok&0&6
vkns”k }kjk]
gLrk{kfjr@&
iz/kku lfpo ¼fo|qr½A
&&&&&&&
cgqmˆs”kh; ifj;kstuk,W ,oa fo|qr foHkkx
vf/klwpuk ¼”kqf) i=½
16 tuojh] 2012
la[;k fo|qr&N%&¼5½&23@2011-&bl foHkkx dh lela[;d vf/klwpuk fnukad 03&12&2011 tks
fd xzke QkVh o dksBh 'kSa'kj] mi&rglhy lSat] ftyk dqYyw esa Hkwfe vf/kxzg.k djus gsrq tkjh dh xbZ gS]
dh fooj.kh esa ^^rglhy mn;iqj** ds LFkku ij ^^mi&rglhy lSat** i<+k tk,A
vkns”k }kjk]
gLrk{kfjr@&
iz/kku lfpo ¼fo|qr½A
5187
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
cgqmÌs”kh; ifj;kstuk,sa ,oa fo|qr foHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f”keyk] 17 tuojh] 2012
la[;k fo|qr&N%¼5½&21@2011-&jkT;iky] fgekpy izns”k] fe;kM+ ty fo|qr ifj;kstuk ¼120
eSxkokV½ ds fuekZ.k gsrq Hkwfe vtZu vf/kfu;e] 1894 dh /kkjk 6 ls 16 ¼nksuks “kkfey½ rFkk /kkjk 18&37
¼nksuksa “kkfey½ ds izko/kku ykxw djus gsrq /kkjk 41 ds vUrxZr eSlt+Z fe;kM+ gkbZMªks bysfDVªd ikoj dEiuh
fyfeVsM] Mh&425] lSDVj& 4] U;w f”keyk& 171009 ds lkFk gq, bdjkjukek ¼vuqcU/k&d½ dks /kkjk&42 ds
vUrxZr izdk”ku djus ds lg’kZ vkns”k iznku djrs gSaA
vkns”k }kjk]
gLrk{kfjr@&
iz/kku lfpo ¼fo|qr½A
&&&&&&&
vuqcU/k&d
AGREEMENT UNDER SECTION 41 OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894
In respect of
Miyar Hydro Electric Project (120 MW)
THIS AGREEMENT is made on this 10th day of January, Two thousand twelve
BETWEEN
The M/s Miyar Hydro Electric Power Company Limited, a company registered under the
Companies Act, 1956 and having it registered office at D-425, Sector– 4, New Shimla –171009
Himachal Pradesh, through Shri Rajan Saklani, General Manager, appointed by the Company as its
Attorney (hereinafter called the “The Company” which expression shall include its heirs,
successors and assigns) of the first part.
AND
THE GOVERNOR of Himachal Pradesh through the Principal Secretary (MPP& Power) to
the Government of Himachal Pradesh (Hereinafter called the “Government,” which expression
shall include its successor in office and assigns) of the Second part.
WHEREAS, upon the application of the Company for the acquisition of surface rights over
land required for implementation of Miyar Hydro Electric Project (120 MW), the Government of
Himachal Pradesh have agreed to acquire the land on behalf of the Company under the provision of
the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Act No. 1 of 1894), the pieces or parcels of land described and
delineated in the Schedule hereto annexed and situated in the revenue estate of Village Ghari and
Haruka, Sub-Tehsil Udaipur, Distt. Lahaul & Spiti, Himachal Pradesh, total measuring 61-13-04
bighas. having been shown to the satisfaction of the said Government that the proposed acquisition
is needed for implementation of Miyar Hydro Electric Project (120 MW) and whereas the said
Government have called upon the Company under the provision of Section 41 of the Act ibid to
enter into an agreement with the Government hereinafter contained.
Now, these presents witness and it is hereby agreed and declared as follows:-
5188
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
1.
On demand, the Company shall pay to the Government of Himachal Pradesh all and
every compensation in respect of the said land tendered, paid or awarded to be
tendered, paid or awarded by the Collector under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, or
by the Court or Courts to which an appeal from the award of the said Court may be
preferred and all costs, charges and expenses of the proceedings in the aforesaid
Courts or otherwise incidental to the proposed acquisition or payable in respect
thereof under the provision of the said Act.
2.
On demand, made by the said Collector the obligations of the company under the
last preceding clause not being thereby limited, the Company shall deposit with the
said Collector such sum or sums of money as in the discretion the said Collector
may in anticipation estimate to be necessary for the purpose mentioned in the
preceding clause.
3.
On payment by the Company of all demands under the foregoing first clause, or, in
the discretion of the said Government of Himachal Pradesh (On deposit by the
Company of all estimated amounts as provided in the section clause) but not before
possession shall have been taken under the provisions of the above mentioned Act,
the Governor, Himachal Pradesh shall make over possession of the said land to the
company and shall execute and do such all acts and deeds as may be necessary and
proper for effectually vesting the same in the Company.
4.
In case, Company has offered the land and construction etc. there in as security with
the previous sanction of the Government for raising loans from financial
Institutions/ Banks etc., within India and outside, the Government not withstanding
such sanction shall have recourse to its rights for resumption of the land under this
clause even during the period such loan is outstanding, if the land is not utilized for
the purpose for which it was acquired under the provisions of the Land Acquisition
Act, 1894.
5.
The said land shall be held by the Company for the purpose for which it is acquired
or purpose legitimately connected as is herein before mentioned and without the
sanction in writing of the said Government of Himachal Pradesh first had obtained
for no other purpose whatsoever.
6.
That said construction shall be completed and fully equipped in all respect ready for
use within the time schedule as stipulated in the Implementation Agreement for the
Miyar Hydro Electric Project (120 MW). Should the said construction not be
completed (and fully equipped in all respect ready for use) within the time schedule
as stipulated in the Implementation Agreement stated in the last preceding clause or
within such further period as in its discretion may be prescribed or allowed by the
said Government of Himachal Pradesh or should the said land at any time thereafter
cease for a period as described by the Government of Himachal Pradesh to be held
and used or cease to be required for the purpose or purposes provided for in the
foregoing clauses then in any such case, the said Government may summarily re-
enter upon and take possession of the said land together with all structures/ buildings
thereon, whether such structures/ buildings were erected before or after transfer of
the land and buildings shall absolutely cease and determine and vest in the State
Government free from all encumbrances.
7.
The Company shall provide employment to one member of each of the displaced
families during the construction period of the project, which shall form part of the
rehabilitation plan to be prepared and implemented at the cost of the company.
5189
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
During the operation and maintenance of the project, the company shall give
preference for employment to the members of the displaced families employed
during the construction period.
8.
In case of breach of any condition by the company, the state Government shall have
right to determine the agreement by 15 days show cause notice to the company. In
case the company fails to explain its position to the satisfaction of the State
Government and rectify the breach of the conditions so enumerated in the show
cause notice, the State Government shall have absolute right to rescind the
agreement and re-enter upon and take possession of the said land together with all
structures/ buildings thereon and thereupon the interest of the Company in the said
land and structures/ buildings shall cease and determine and vest in the State
Government free from all encumbrances.
IN WITNESS Where of the seal of the Company has been affixed and the Government of
the State of Himachal Pradesh herein to set his hand and seal, the day month and year herein above
mentioned.
For and on behalf of
Governor of Himachal Pradesh
Miyar Hydro Electric Power Co. Ltd.
Through
Sd/-
Sd/-
(Rajan Saklani)
Principal Secretary (MPP& Power) to
the Government of Himachal Pradesh.
Witness:
Witness:
1.
Sd/-
1.
Sd/-
2.
Sd/-
2.
Sd/-
____________
SCHEDULE
District
Sub-Tehsil
Village
Khasra No.
Area (Bigha)
Lahaul & Spiti
Udaipur
Ghari
4
00-12-00
5
00-08-00
39
01-13-00
44
01-00-00
187
00-00-06
188
00-02-00
218/1
00-05-14
218/2
00-14-08
219/1
00-01-16
Kitta: 9 Area: 04-17-04
Haruka
71
02-03-00
72
00-07-00
73
03-19-00
74
00-19-00
75
00-06-00
76
01-11-00
77
02-09-00
78
01-13-00
322/79
00-08-00
5190
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
80
00-10-00
81
00-07-00
82
01-02-00
83
01-03-00
84
00-11-00
85
00-10-00
326/86
00-13-00
106
01-12-00
430/107
00-17-00
431/107
0000-17-00
120
01-10-00
121
02-09-00
314/123
00-02-00
315/123
02-02-00
124
01-07-00
125
00-18-00
126
00-05-00
127
00-11-00
436/128
00-12-00
437/128
00-12-00
438/128
00-01-00
129
01-01-00
129/1
01-00-00
439/13
0 00-08-00
440/130
00-10-00
131
00-02-00
132
01-05-00
133
00-12-00
134
00-13-00
135
01-00-00
136
01-06-00
137
01-08-00
138
00-01-00
139
01-08-00
143
00-05-00
144
00-07-00
145
00-04-00
146
00-03-00
147
00-16-00
148
01-03-00
149
01-04-00
150
02-11-00
151
01-10-00
152
00-14-00
153
00-18-00
154
01-01-00
155
02-04-00
156
00-06-00
157
00-10-00
Kitta: 58 Area: 56-16-00
Total Kitta: 67 Total Area: 61-13-04
5191
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
cgqmÌs”kh; ifj;kstuk,sa ,oa fo|qr foHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f”keyk] 17 tuojh] 2012
la[;k fo|qr&N%¼5½&49@2010-&jkT;iky] fgekpy izns”k] “kksjax ty fo|qr ifj;kstuk ¼100
eSxkokV½ ds fuekZ.k gsrq Hkwfe vtZu vf/kfu;e] 1894 dh /kkjk 6 ls 16 ¼nksuks “kkfey½ rFkk /kkjk 18&37
¼nksuksa “kkfey½ ds izko/kku ykxw djus gsrq /kkjk 41 ds vUrxZr eSlt+Z fgekpy “kksjax ikoj izkbZosV fyfeVsM]
lh& 35] ysu&AA] lSDVj&A] U;w f”keyk& 171009 ds lkFk gq, bdjkjukek ¼vuqcU/k&d½ dks /kkjk&42 ds
vUrxZr izdk”ku djus ds lg’kZ vkns”k iznku djrs gSaA
vkns”k }kjk]
gLrk{kfjr@&
iz/kku lfpo ¼fo|qr½A
&&&&&&&
vuqcU/k&d
AGREEMENT UNDER SECTION 41 OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894
In respect of
Sorang Hydroelectric Project (100 MW)
THIS AGREEMENT is made on this 10th day of January, Two thousand twelve
BETWEEN
The M/s Himachal Sorang Power Pvt. Ltd. C–35, Lane – II, Sector – I, New Shimla,
Shimla –171 009, a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and having it registered
office at C – 35, Lane – II, Sector – I, New Shimla, Shimla –171009 through Shri Anup Singh
Banyal, Manager, appointed by the Company as its Attorney (hereinafter called ”The Company”
which expression shall include its heirs, successors and assigns) of the first part.
AND
THE GOVERNOR of Himachal Pradesh through the Principal Secretary (MPP& Power) to
the Government of Himachal Pradesh (Hereinafter called the “Government”, which expression
shall include its successors in office and assigns) of the Second part.
WHEREAS, upon the applicant of the Company for the acquisition of surface rights over
land required for implementation of 100 MW Sorang Hydroelectric Project, the Government of
Himachal Pradesh have agreed to acquire the land on behalf of the Company under the provision of
the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Act No.1 of 1894), the pieces or parcels of land described and
delineated in the Schedule hereto annexed and situated in the revenue estate of Village Sorang,
Tehsil Nichar, Distt. Kinnaur, Himachal Pradesh, total measuring 01-99-13 hect. having been
shown to the satisfaction of the said Government that the proposed acquisition is needed for
implementation of 100 MW Sorang Hydroelectric Project and whereas the said Government have
called upon the Company under the provisions of Section 41 of the Act ibid to enter into an
agreement with the Government hereinafter contained.
5192
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
Now, these presents witness and it is hereby agreed and declared as follows:-
1.
On demand, the Company shall pay to the Government of Himachal Pradesh all and
every compensation in respect of the said land tendered, paid or awarded to be
tendered, paid or awarded by the Collector under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, or
by the Court or Courts to which an appeal from the award of the said Court may be
preferred and all costs, charges and expenses of the proceedings in the aforesaid
Courts or otherwise incidental to the proposed acquisition or payable in respect
thereof under the provisions of the said Act.
2.
On demand, made by the said Collector the obligations of the Company under the
last preceding clause not being thereby limited, the Company shall deposit with the
said Collector such sum or sums of money as in his discretion the said Collector
may in anticipation estimate to be necessary for the purpose mentioned in the
preceding clause.
3.
On payment by the Company of all demands under the foregoing first clause, or, in
the discretion of the said Government of Himachal Pradesh( On deposit by the
Company of all estimated amounts as provided in the section clause) but not before
possession shall have been taken under the provisions of the above mentioned Act,
the Governor, Himachal Pradesh shall make over possession of the said land to the
company and shall execute and do such all acts and deeds as may be necessary and
proper for effectually vesting the same in the Company.
4.
In case, Company has offered the land and construction etc. there in as security with
the previous sanction of the Government for raising loans from financial
Institutions/Banks etc., within in India and outside, the Government not
withstanding such sanction shall have recourse to its rights for resumption of the
land under this clause even during the period such loan is outstanding, if the land is
not utilized for the purpose for which it was acquired under the provisions of the
Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
5.
The said land shall be held by the Company for the purpose for which it is acquired
or purpose legitimately connected as is herein before mentioned and without the
sanction in writing of the said Government of Himachal Pradesh first had obtained
for no other purpose whatsoever.
6.
That said construction shall be completed and fully equipped in all respect ready for
use within the time schedule as stipulated in the Implementation Agreement for the
Sorang (100 MW) Hydroelectric Project. Should the said construction not be
completed ( and fully equipped in all respect ready for use) within the time schedule
as stipulated in the Implementation Agreement stated in the last preceding clause or
within such further period as in its discretion may be prescribed or allowed by the
said Government of Himachal Pradesh or should the said land at any time thereafter
cease for a period as prescribed by the Government of Himachal Pradesh to be held
and used or cease to be required for the purpose or purposes provided for in the
foregoing clauses then in any such case, the said Government may summarily re-
enter upon and take possession of the said land together with all structures/ buildings
thereon, whether such structures/buildings were erected before or after transfer of
the land and buildings shall absolutely cease and determine and vest in the State
Government free from all encumbrances.
7.
The company shall provide employment to one member of each of the displaced
families during the construction period of the project, which shall form part of the
rehabilitation plan to be prepared and implemented at the cost of company. During
5193
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
the operation and maintenance of the project, the company shall give preference for
employment to the members of the displaced families employed during the
construction period.
8.
In case of breach of any conditions by the company, the state Government shall have
right to determine the agreement by giving 15 days show cause notice to the
company. In case the company fails to explain its position to the satisfaction of the
State Government and rectify the breach of the conditions so enumerated in the
show cause notice, the State Government shall have absolute right to rescind the
agreement and re-enter upon and take possession of the said land together with all
structures/buildings thereon and thereupon the interest of the company in the said
land and structures/ buildings shall cease and determine and vest in the state
Government free from all encumbrances.
IN WITNESS Where of the seal of the Company has been affixed and the Government of
the State of Himachal Pradesh herein to set his hand and seal, the day month and year herein above
mentioned.
For and behalf of
M/s Himachal Sorang Power Pvt. Ltd.
Witness:
1. Sd/-
Sd/
(Anup Singh Banyal)
Manager
2. Sd/-
Governor of Himachal Pradesh
Through Principal Secretary (Power) to the
Witness:
Government of Himachal Pradesh
1. Sd/-
Sd/-
Principal Secretary (Power) to the
Government of Himachal Pradesh,
2. Sd/-
_________
SCHEDULE
District
Tehsil
Village
Khasra No.
Area (Hect.)
Kinnaur
Nichar
Choura
31/2
00-14-43
402/57/1
00-25-73
6
00-08-88
7
00-01-90
8
00-00-72
9
00-05-92
Shilani
716/1
00-09-00
Barakamba
110/1
00-01-55
106/2/1
00-00-90
108/2
00-03-05
108/3
00-00-64
1917/2
00-01-67
2021/1375/1
00-00-80
5194
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
105/1
00-00-79
1371
00-01-20
1364
00-00-12
1553
00-01-49
1349/1
00-00-39
1388/1
00-00-38
1361
00-00-63
1372
00-02-57
1336/1
00-00-62
1340
00-00-50
1362
00-02-70
1337/1
00-00-58
1363
00-00-52
1369/1
00-00-28
1328/1
00-00-36
117/1
00-02-18
1698/1
00-01-24
118
00-00-38
Burang
676
00-05-50
677
00-00-98
652/1
00-19-20
652/2
00-00-67
653
00-01-52
655
00-00-79
661
00-03-84
684
00-02-44
727/1
00-00-83
727/2
00-12-37
695
00-01-88
697/2
00-10-59
696
00-00-21
698
00-00-58
699
00-00-28
485/2/1
00-01-62
672
00-04-31
673
00-00-56
674
00-03-15
675
00-03-50
631/1
00-00-80
630
00-01-30
688
00-03-84
722/1
00-02-63
704
00-05-19
606
00-02-57
609
00-01-48
610
00-01-31
607
00-00-10
608
00-03-71
627
00-05-37
612
00-03-89
Kita- 63 Total Area 01-99-13
5196
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
5198
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
5200
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
5201
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
5202
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
5203
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
5206
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
5207
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
5208
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 18 tuojh] 2012@28 ikS’k] 1933
fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr
