jkti=] fgekpy izns'k

fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr

f”keyk] “kqØokj 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k 1933

fgekpy izns'k ljdkj

(Authoritative English Text of Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No. Rev.1-

9(Stamp)3/79/2010-II dated 12.01.20012 as required under Article 348(3) of the Constitution of

India].

REVENUE DEPARTMENT

(Stamp-Registration)

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171002, the 12th Jan, 2012

No. Rev. 1-9(Stamp)3/79/2010-II.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Sections 78

and 79 of the Registration Act,1908 (XVI of 1908), as applicable to the State of Himachal Pradesh,

and in superssession of all the previous notifications issued in this regard, from time to time, the

Governor of Himachal Pradesh is pleased to prescribe the Article–I of the Table of Registration

Fees of the documents, as notified vide Notification No.17-13/66-Rev.-I dated 14 April, 1969 for

whole of Himachal Pradesh to be effective from the date of its publication in the Rajpatra,

Himachal Pradesh, namely:-

219&jkti=@2012&27&1&2012 ¼5305½

5306

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933

TABLE OF REGISTRATION FEES

(Sections 78 and 79 of the Registration Act, 1908)

Description of instrument

Rates of Registration Fee

Article-I.- For the registration of documents:

(A)

For

the

registration

of

following

documents

relating

to

immovable

property:-

(i) Certificate of Sale;

(ii) Conveyance/Sale;

(iii) Further Charge(with possession);

(iv) Gift;

(v) Mortgage-Deed(with possession);

Registration fee @ 2.00% of the market value of

the property or consideration amount, as the

case may be, "whichever is higher", subject to

the minimum of rupees one hundred and fee

rounded off to nearest rupees Ten shall be

charged.

(B)

On the instruments of assignment of debt

by the Financial Institutions and Banks

chargeable as Conveyance under Article

23 of Schedule 1-A of the Indian Stamp

Act,1899 executed in favour of Assets

Reconstruction

Company

constituted

under Section 3 of the Securitization and

Reconstruction of Financial Assets and

Enforcement of Security Interest Act,

2002 (Act No.54 of 2002) and registered

under the Companies Act, 1956 (Act

No.1 of 1956) by the Department of

Non-Banking

Supervision,

Reserve

Bank of India, Mumbai.

Registration fee shall be charged as per the

rates given in clause (A) above.

(C) Lease for immovable property.

Registration fee given in clause (A) above shall

be charged on the same amount of the market

value of the leased property, on which stamp

duty has been assessed under article 35 of

Schedule I-A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899.

(D)

For

the

registration

of

following

miscellaneous documents:-

(i)

Deposit of Title-Deeds, Pawn or

Pledge;

(ii)

Bond;

(iii)

Bottomry Bond;

(iv)

Exchange Deed;

(v)

Further Charge (without

possession);

(vi)

Mortgage-Deed (without

possession);

(vii) Partition Deed;

(viii) Release Deed;

(ix)

Respondentia Bond;

(x)

Settlement Deed;

(xi)

Transfer of Lease.

Registration fee @ 0.05% of the value or the

consideration amount, if any, subject to the

minimum of rupees one hundred and maximum

rupees one thousand shall be charged.

5307

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933

(E) For the registration of any other documents:-

Documents which cannot be brought under the

scale prescribed by the preceding clauses of this

Table (including Power of Attorney, Will or

deposit, withdrawal and opening of Sealed Wills

or Adoption Deed etc.).

A registration fee of rupees one hundred shall be

charged.

Note 1.

Such fee in the case of duplicates, if presented with the original shall be Rs. 10 only.

Duplicate, if not presented alongwith their original shall be treated like the originals.

Note 2.

The registration fee to be paid on partition deeds shall be calculated on the value of

the share or shares on which stamp duty has been assessed under Article 45 of

Schedule 1A to the Indian Stamp Act, 1899.

Provided that no registration fee shall be chargeable on a document executed in favour of or

on behalf of Government where registration fee is payable by the Government.

By Order,

DEEPAK SANAN,

Principal Secy.-Cum-FC(Revenue).

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 3rd December, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Sheela Devi W/O Shri Roop Lal, R/O

Village Garoru, P.O. Sajau Piplu, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla /Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Sheela Devi W/O Shri Roop Lal, R/O Village

Garoru, P.O. Sajau Piplu, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-

07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and

justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman

is entitled to from the concerned employer?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner,

5308

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 3rd December, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Reeta Devi W/O Shri Partap Singh, R/O

Village Jangehail, P.O. Ropri, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla /Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Reeta Devi W/O Shri Partap Singh, R/O Village

Jangehail, P.O. Ropri, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-

07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and

justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman

is entitled to from the concerned employer?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 3rd December, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Tilku Devi W/O Shri Bela Ram, R/O Village

and P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D.

(B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

5309

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla /Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Tilku Devi W/O Shri Bela Ram, R/O Village

and P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-

07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and

justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman

is entitled to from the concerned employer?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 3rd December, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Krishni Devi W/O Late Shri Sohan Singh,

R/O Village Haryanal, P.O. Tanehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla /Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Krishni Devi W/O Late Shri Sohan Singh, R/O

Village Haryanal, P.O. Tanehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

w.e.f. 08-07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is

legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named

workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

5310

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 3rd December, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Leela Devi W/O Shri Bhoop Singh, R/O

Village and P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Leela Devi W/O Shri Bhoop Singh, R/O Village

and P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-

07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and

justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman

is entitled to from the concerned employer?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 26th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Kameshwar Dutt S/O Shri Laskri Ram,

Village Dawardu, P.O. Ropadi, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

5311

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Kameshwar Dutt S/O Shri Laskri Ram, Village

Dawardu, P.O. Ropadi, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-

07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and

justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman

is entitled to from the concerned employer?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 26th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Som Raj S/O Shri Sukh Ram, R/O Village

Raru, P.O. Ropari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D.

(B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Som Raj S/O Shri Sukh Ram, R/O Village Raru,

P.O. Ropari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D.

(B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-07-2005

without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified?

If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman is entitled

to from the concerned employer?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

5312

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 26th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Lekh Raj S/O Shri Swami Ram R/O Village

Barerdi, P.O. Pehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Lekh Raj S/O Shri Swami Ram R/O Village

Barerdi, P.O. Pehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-

07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and

justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman

is entitled to from the concerned employer?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 26th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Ramesh Chand S/O Shri Keshav Ram, R/O

Village Saraskan, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

5313

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Ramesh Chand S/O Shri Keshav Ram, R/O

Village Saraskan, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

w.e.f. 08-07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is

legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named

workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 26th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Bhim Singh S/O Shri Bardu Ram, R/O

Village Badehar, P.O. Kujabalh, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Bhim Singh S/O Shri Bardu Ram, R/O Village

Badehar, P.O. Kujabalh, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-

07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and

justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman

is entitled to from the concerned employer?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

5314

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 26th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Sanjay Kumar S/O Shri Sant Ram, R/O

Village Sanour, P.O. Sari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Sanjay Kumar S/O Shri Sant Ram, R/O Village

Sanour, P.O. Sari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-

07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and

justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman

is entitled to from the concerned employer?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 26th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Randhir Barwal S/O Shri Ruvel Chand, R/O

Village Kaltri, P.O. Kothuwan, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

5315

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Randhir Barwal S/O Shri Ruvel Chand, R/O

Village Kaltri, P.O. Kothuwan, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

w.e.f. 08-07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is

legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named

workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Marahaju Devi W/O Shri Jagat Ram, R/O

Village Gehra Trembla, P.O. Longni, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Marahaju Devi W/O Shri Jagat Ram, R/O

Village Gehra Trembla, P.O. Longni, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District

Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the

above named workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

5316

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Inderi Devi W/O Shri Kunju Ram, R/O

Village Baral, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Inderi Devi W/O Shri Kunju Ram, R/O Village

Baral, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-

07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and

justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman

is entitled to from the concerned employer?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENTDEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Shakuntla Devi W/O Shri Panjak Ram, R/O

Village Baral, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

5317

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Shakuntla Devi W/O Shri Panjak Ram, R/O

Village Baral, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

w.e.f. 08-07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is

legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named

workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENTDEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Kamla Devi W/O Shri Raj Kumar, R/O

Village Kapahi, P.O. Sari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Kamla Devi W/O Shri Raj Kumar, R/O Village

Kapahi, P.O. Sari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-

07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and

justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman

is entitled to from the concerned employer?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

5318

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Shakuntla Devi W/O Shri Panjak Ram, R/O

Village Baral, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Shakuntla Devi W/O Shri Panjak Ram, R/O

Village Baral, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

w.e.f. 08-07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is

legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named

workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Shantoo Devi W/O Shri Gian Chand, R/O

Village Baral, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

5319

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Shantoo Devi W/O Shri Gian Chand, R/O

Village Baral, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

w.e.f. 08-07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is

legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named

workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Nek Ram S/O Shri Safria Ram, R/O Village

Hukal, P.O. Longni, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Nek Ram S/O Shri Safria Ram, R/O Village

Hukal, P.O. Longni, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-

07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and

justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman

is entitled to from the concerned employer?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

5320

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Kamlesh Kumar S/O Shri Sonu Ram, R/O

Village Banal, P.O. Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Kamlesh Kumar S/O Shri Sonu Ram, R/O

Village Banal, P.O. Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

w.e.f. 08-07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is

legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named

workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”

Sd/-

Labour Commissioner.

_________

Office of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur (H. P.)

NOTICE

Whereas, Smt. Aamna Begum d/o Shri Zahid Ali, r/o H. No. 100, W. No. 2, Badri Nagar,

Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur (H.P.), presently practising as an Advocate at Paonta Sahib, has

applied for the appointment as Notary in the sub-division.

And whereas, the action under rule 6 and 7 of the Notaries Rules, 156 is required to be

taken on the application of the said Advocate.

Therefore, objections, if any, to the appointment of the applicant as Notary are hereby

invited from the general public, Bar Association and other authority of Paonta sub-division by

issuing this notice under rule 6 (b) of the said rules within fourteen days of such publication so that

further action could be taken in the matter accordingly.

Issued on the 7th day of January, 2012 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

VIJAY KUMAR (HAS),

Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur (H. P.).

5321

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933

FORM NO. 48

[See Rule 99]

IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

In the matter of the Companies Act, 1956

And

In the matter of JHS Svendgaard Laboratories Limited

Company Petition No.8 of 2009

Soni Gulati & Co. Petitioner

Advertisement of Petition

Notice is hereby given that a petition for a winding-up of the above named company by the

High Court at Shimla was on the 29th day of September, 2009, presented to the said Court by Soni

Gulati & Co., Thakur Bhawan near Sankat Mochan Taradevi, Shimla-171010, a Creditor and that

the said petition is directed to be heard before the said Court on the 6th day of March, 2012.

Any creditor, contributory or other person desirous of supporting or opposing the making of

an order on the said petition should send to the petitioner or his advocate notice of his intention

signed by him or his advocate with his name and address, so as to reach the petitioner or his

advocate not later than 5 days before the date fixed for the hearing of the petition, and appear at the

hearing for the purpose in person or his advocate. A copy of the petition will be furnished by the

undersigned to any creditor or contributory on payment of the prescribed charges for the same.

Any affidavit intended to be used in opposition to the petition should be filed in Courts and

a copy served on the petitioner or his advocate, not less than 5 days before the date fixed for the

hearing.

Shimla :

Dated : 14-12-2011

Kapil Dev Sood,

Advocate

Dalzil Lodge Behind

State Bank of India, Shimla-171001.

Advocate for the Petitioner.

________

TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 24th January, 2012

No. Tpt-F(1)8/2000.—Whereas, it appears to the Governor, Himachal Pradesh that the land

is likely to be required by the Himachal Pradesh Government on behalf and expenses of the

Himachal Road Transport Corporation (which is a Himachal Pradesh Government Undertaking) for

public purpose, namely for construction of approach road to new Himachal Road Transport

Corporation workshop Una, District Una Himachal Pradesh. It is hereby notified that land in the

locality described below is likely to be acquired for the above mentioned public purpose.

5322

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933

2.

This notification is made under the provisions of section-4 of the Land Acquisition

Act, 1894 to all whom it may concern.

3.

In exercise of the powers conferred by the aforesaid section the Governor, Himachal

Pradesh is pleased to authorize the Officers for the time being engaged in or by the above said

undertaking with their servants and workmen to enter upon and survey any land in the locality and

to do all other acts required or permitted by that section.

4.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred under section-17(4) of the said Act, the

Governor of Himachal Pradesh is pleased to direct that the provisions of section-5-A will not apply

in regard to this acquisition.

5.

The drawings etc. relating to land in question may be examined in the office of

SDO(C)-cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Una, district Una.

SPECIFICATION OF LAND

District

Tehsil

Muhal/Upmuhal

Khasra No.

Area (in sq.

decimeters)

Una

Una

Una/Bag

1100/1

25.00

Una

Una

Una/Bag

1101/1

31.25

Una

Una

Una/Bag

1102/1

105-89

Total:- Kita-3

162-14

By order,

Sd/-

Principal Secretary (Transport).

fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr