jkti=] fgekpy izns'k
fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr
f”keyk] “kqØokj 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k 1933
fgekpy izns'k ljdkj
(Authoritative English Text of Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No. Rev.1-
9(Stamp)3/79/2010-II dated 12.01.20012 as required under Article 348(3) of the Constitution of
India].
REVENUE DEPARTMENT
(Stamp-Registration)
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171002, the 12th Jan, 2012
No. Rev. 1-9(Stamp)3/79/2010-II.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Sections 78
and 79 of the Registration Act,1908 (XVI of 1908), as applicable to the State of Himachal Pradesh,
and in superssession of all the previous notifications issued in this regard, from time to time, the
Governor of Himachal Pradesh is pleased to prescribe the Article–I of the Table of Registration
Fees of the documents, as notified vide Notification No.17-13/66-Rev.-I dated 14 April, 1969 for
whole of Himachal Pradesh to be effective from the date of its publication in the Rajpatra,
Himachal Pradesh, namely:-
219&jkti=@2012&27&1&2012 ¼5305½
5306
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933
TABLE OF REGISTRATION FEES
(Sections 78 and 79 of the Registration Act, 1908)
Description of instrument
Rates of Registration Fee
Article-I.- For the registration of documents:
(A)
For
the
registration
of
following
documents
relating
to
immovable
property:-
(i) Certificate of Sale;
(ii) Conveyance/Sale;
(iii) Further Charge(with possession);
(iv) Gift;
(v) Mortgage-Deed(with possession);
Registration fee @ 2.00% of the market value of
the property or consideration amount, as the
case may be, "whichever is higher", subject to
the minimum of rupees one hundred and fee
rounded off to nearest rupees Ten shall be
charged.
(B)
On the instruments of assignment of debt
by the Financial Institutions and Banks
chargeable as Conveyance under Article
23 of Schedule 1-A of the Indian Stamp
Act,1899 executed in favour of Assets
Reconstruction
Company
constituted
under Section 3 of the Securitization and
Reconstruction of Financial Assets and
Enforcement of Security Interest Act,
2002 (Act No.54 of 2002) and registered
under the Companies Act, 1956 (Act
No.1 of 1956) by the Department of
Non-Banking
Supervision,
Reserve
Bank of India, Mumbai.
Registration fee shall be charged as per the
rates given in clause (A) above.
(C) Lease for immovable property.
Registration fee given in clause (A) above shall
be charged on the same amount of the market
value of the leased property, on which stamp
duty has been assessed under article 35 of
Schedule I-A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899.
(D)
For
the
registration
of
following
miscellaneous documents:-
(i)
Deposit of Title-Deeds, Pawn or
Pledge;
(ii)
Bond;
(iii)
Bottomry Bond;
(iv)
Exchange Deed;
(v)
Further Charge (without
possession);
(vi)
Mortgage-Deed (without
possession);
(vii) Partition Deed;
(viii) Release Deed;
(ix)
Respondentia Bond;
(x)
Settlement Deed;
(xi)
Transfer of Lease.
Registration fee @ 0.05% of the value or the
consideration amount, if any, subject to the
minimum of rupees one hundred and maximum
rupees one thousand shall be charged.
5307
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933
(E) For the registration of any other documents:-
Documents which cannot be brought under the
scale prescribed by the preceding clauses of this
Table (including Power of Attorney, Will or
deposit, withdrawal and opening of Sealed Wills
or Adoption Deed etc.).
A registration fee of rupees one hundred shall be
charged.
Note 1.
Such fee in the case of duplicates, if presented with the original shall be Rs. 10 only.
Duplicate, if not presented alongwith their original shall be treated like the originals.
Note 2.
The registration fee to be paid on partition deeds shall be calculated on the value of
the share or shares on which stamp duty has been assessed under Article 45 of
Schedule 1A to the Indian Stamp Act, 1899.
Provided that no registration fee shall be chargeable on a document executed in favour of or
on behalf of Government where registration fee is payable by the Government.
By Order,
DEEPAK SANAN,
Principal Secy.-Cum-FC(Revenue).
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 3rd December, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Sheela Devi W/O Shri Roop Lal, R/O
Village Garoru, P.O. Sajau Piplu, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla /Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Sheela Devi W/O Shri Roop Lal, R/O Village
Garoru, P.O. Sajau Piplu, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner,
5308
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 3rd December, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Reeta Devi W/O Shri Partap Singh, R/O
Village Jangehail, P.O. Ropri, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla /Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Reeta Devi W/O Shri Partap Singh, R/O Village
Jangehail, P.O. Ropri, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 3rd December, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Tilku Devi W/O Shri Bela Ram, R/O Village
and P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D.
(B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
5309
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla /Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Tilku Devi W/O Shri Bela Ram, R/O Village
and P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 3rd December, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Krishni Devi W/O Late Shri Sohan Singh,
R/O Village Haryanal, P.O. Tanehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla /Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Krishni Devi W/O Late Shri Sohan Singh, R/O
Village Haryanal, P.O. Tanehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
w.e.f. 08-07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is
legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named
workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5310
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 3rd December, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Leela Devi W/O Shri Bhoop Singh, R/O
Village and P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Leela Devi W/O Shri Bhoop Singh, R/O Village
and P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 26th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Kameshwar Dutt S/O Shri Laskri Ram,
Village Dawardu, P.O. Ropadi, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
5311
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Kameshwar Dutt S/O Shri Laskri Ram, Village
Dawardu, P.O. Ropadi, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 26th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Som Raj S/O Shri Sukh Ram, R/O Village
Raru, P.O. Ropari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D.
(B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Som Raj S/O Shri Sukh Ram, R/O Village Raru,
P.O. Ropari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D.
(B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-07-2005
without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified?
If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman is entitled
to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5312
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 26th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Lekh Raj S/O Shri Swami Ram R/O Village
Barerdi, P.O. Pehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Lekh Raj S/O Shri Swami Ram R/O Village
Barerdi, P.O. Pehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 26th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Ramesh Chand S/O Shri Keshav Ram, R/O
Village Saraskan, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
5313
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Ramesh Chand S/O Shri Keshav Ram, R/O
Village Saraskan, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
w.e.f. 08-07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is
legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named
workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 26th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Bhim Singh S/O Shri Bardu Ram, R/O
Village Badehar, P.O. Kujabalh, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Bhim Singh S/O Shri Bardu Ram, R/O Village
Badehar, P.O. Kujabalh, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5314
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 26th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Sanjay Kumar S/O Shri Sant Ram, R/O
Village Sanour, P.O. Sari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Sanjay Kumar S/O Shri Sant Ram, R/O Village
Sanour, P.O. Sari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 26th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Randhir Barwal S/O Shri Ruvel Chand, R/O
Village Kaltri, P.O. Kothuwan, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
5315
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Randhir Barwal S/O Shri Ruvel Chand, R/O
Village Kaltri, P.O. Kothuwan, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
w.e.f. 08-07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is
legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named
workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Marahaju Devi W/O Shri Jagat Ram, R/O
Village Gehra Trembla, P.O. Longni, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Marahaju Devi W/O Shri Jagat Ram, R/O
Village Gehra Trembla, P.O. Longni, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District
Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the
above named workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5316
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Inderi Devi W/O Shri Kunju Ram, R/O
Village Baral, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Inderi Devi W/O Shri Kunju Ram, R/O Village
Baral, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENTDEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Shakuntla Devi W/O Shri Panjak Ram, R/O
Village Baral, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
5317
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Shakuntla Devi W/O Shri Panjak Ram, R/O
Village Baral, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
w.e.f. 08-07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is
legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named
workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENTDEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Kamla Devi W/O Shri Raj Kumar, R/O
Village Kapahi, P.O. Sari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Kamla Devi W/O Shri Raj Kumar, R/O Village
Kapahi, P.O. Sari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5318
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Shakuntla Devi W/O Shri Panjak Ram, R/O
Village Baral, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Shakuntla Devi W/O Shri Panjak Ram, R/O
Village Baral, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
w.e.f. 08-07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is
legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named
workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Shantoo Devi W/O Shri Gian Chand, R/O
Village Baral, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
5319
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Shantoo Devi W/O Shri Gian Chand, R/O
Village Baral, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
w.e.f. 08-07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is
legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named
workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Nek Ram S/O Shri Safria Ram, R/O Village
Hukal, P.O. Longni, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Nek Ram S/O Shri Safria Ram, R/O Village
Hukal, P.O. Longni, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5320
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Kamlesh Kumar S/O Shri Sonu Ram, R/O
Village Banal, P.O. Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Kamlesh Kumar S/O Shri Sonu Ram, R/O
Village Banal, P.O. Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
w.e.f. 08-07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is
legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named
workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
Office of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur (H. P.)
NOTICE
Whereas, Smt. Aamna Begum d/o Shri Zahid Ali, r/o H. No. 100, W. No. 2, Badri Nagar,
Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur (H.P.), presently practising as an Advocate at Paonta Sahib, has
applied for the appointment as Notary in the sub-division.
And whereas, the action under rule 6 and 7 of the Notaries Rules, 156 is required to be
taken on the application of the said Advocate.
Therefore, objections, if any, to the appointment of the applicant as Notary are hereby
invited from the general public, Bar Association and other authority of Paonta sub-division by
issuing this notice under rule 6 (b) of the said rules within fourteen days of such publication so that
further action could be taken in the matter accordingly.
Issued on the 7th day of January, 2012 under my hand and seal of the court.
Seal.
VIJAY KUMAR (HAS),
Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur (H. P.).
5321
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933
FORM NO. 48
[See Rule 99]
IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
In the matter of the Companies Act, 1956
And
In the matter of JHS Svendgaard Laboratories Limited
Company Petition No.8 of 2009
Soni Gulati & Co. Petitioner
Advertisement of Petition
Notice is hereby given that a petition for a winding-up of the above named company by the
High Court at Shimla was on the 29th day of September, 2009, presented to the said Court by Soni
Gulati & Co., Thakur Bhawan near Sankat Mochan Taradevi, Shimla-171010, a Creditor and that
the said petition is directed to be heard before the said Court on the 6th day of March, 2012.
Any creditor, contributory or other person desirous of supporting or opposing the making of
an order on the said petition should send to the petitioner or his advocate notice of his intention
signed by him or his advocate with his name and address, so as to reach the petitioner or his
advocate not later than 5 days before the date fixed for the hearing of the petition, and appear at the
hearing for the purpose in person or his advocate. A copy of the petition will be furnished by the
undersigned to any creditor or contributory on payment of the prescribed charges for the same.
Any affidavit intended to be used in opposition to the petition should be filed in Courts and
a copy served on the petitioner or his advocate, not less than 5 days before the date fixed for the
hearing.
Shimla :
Dated : 14-12-2011
Kapil Dev Sood,
Advocate
Dalzil Lodge Behind
State Bank of India, Shimla-171001.
Advocate for the Petitioner.
________
TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 24th January, 2012
No. Tpt-F(1)8/2000.—Whereas, it appears to the Governor, Himachal Pradesh that the land
is likely to be required by the Himachal Pradesh Government on behalf and expenses of the
Himachal Road Transport Corporation (which is a Himachal Pradesh Government Undertaking) for
public purpose, namely for construction of approach road to new Himachal Road Transport
Corporation workshop Una, District Una Himachal Pradesh. It is hereby notified that land in the
locality described below is likely to be acquired for the above mentioned public purpose.
5322
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 27 tuojh] 2012@7 ek?k] 1933
2.
This notification is made under the provisions of section-4 of the Land Acquisition
Act, 1894 to all whom it may concern.
3.
In exercise of the powers conferred by the aforesaid section the Governor, Himachal
Pradesh is pleased to authorize the Officers for the time being engaged in or by the above said
undertaking with their servants and workmen to enter upon and survey any land in the locality and
to do all other acts required or permitted by that section.
4.
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred under section-17(4) of the said Act, the
Governor of Himachal Pradesh is pleased to direct that the provisions of section-5-A will not apply
in regard to this acquisition.
5.
The drawings etc. relating to land in question may be examined in the office of
SDO(C)-cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Una, district Una.
SPECIFICATION OF LAND
District
Tehsil
Muhal/Upmuhal
Khasra No.
Area (in sq.
decimeters)
Una
Una
Una/Bag
1100/1
25.00
Una
Una
Una/Bag
1101/1
31.25
Una
Una
Una/Bag
1102/1
105-89
Total:- Kita-3
162-14
By order,
Sd/-
Principal Secretary (Transport).
fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr