jkti=] fgekpy izns'k
fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr
f”keyk] “kfuokj 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k 1933
fgekpy izns'k ljdkj
fof/k foHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f”keyk&2] 27 tuojh] 2012
la[;k ,y0,y0vkj0&Mh0 ¼6½&35@2011&yst-&fgekpy izns”k dh jkT;iky] Hkkjr ds lafo/kku ds
vuqPNsn 200 ds v/khu iznÙk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, fnukad 18&1&2012 dks vuqeksfnr fgekpy
izns”k ljdkjh LFkku vkSj Hkwfe ¼csn[kyh vkSj fdjk;k olwyh½ la”kks/ku fo/ks;d] 2011¼2011 dk fo/ks;d
la[;kad 32½ dks o’kZ 2012 ds vf/kfu;e la[;kad 1 ds :Ik esa lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 348 ¼3½ ds v/khu
mlds vaxzsth izkf/kd`r ikB lfgr fgekpy izns”k jkti= ¼vlk/kkj.k½ esa izdkf”kr djrh gSaA
vkns”k }kjk]
vorkj pUn Mksxjk]
iz/kku lfpo ¼fof/k½A
220&jkti=@2012&28&1&2012 ¼5323½
5324
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
2012 dk vf/kfu;e la[;kad 1
fgekpy izns”k ljdkjh LFkku vkSj Hkwfe ¼csn[kyh vkSj fdjk;k olwyh½ la”kks/ku vf/kfu;e] 2011
¼jkT;iky egksn;k }kjk rkjh[k 18 tuojh] 2012 dks ;Fkkvuqeksfnr½
fgekpy izns”k ljdkjh LFkku vkSj Hkwfe ¼csn[kyh vkSj fdjk;k olwyh½ vf/kfu;e] 1971 ¼1971 dk
vfèkfu;e la[;kad 22½ dk vkSj la”kks/ku djus ds fy, vf/kfu;eA
Hkkjr x.kjkT; ds cklBosa o’kZ esa fgekpy izns”k fo/kku lHkk }kjk fuEufyf[kr :i esa ;g
vf/kfu;fer gks%&&
1- laf{kIr uke-&bl vf/kfu;e dk laf{kIr uke fgekpy izns”k ljdkjh LFkku vkSj Hkwfe ¼csn[kyh
vkSj fdjk;k olwyh½ la”kks/ku vf/kfu;e] 2011 gSA
2- /kkjk 2 dk la”kks/ku-&fgekpy izns”k ljdkjh LFkku vkSj Hkwfe ¼csn[kyh vkSj fdjk;k olwyh½
vf/kfu;e] 1971 dh /kkjk 2 ds [k.M ¼³½ ds mi&[k.M ¼i½ esa **lqèkkj U;kl** “kCnksa ds Ik”pkr~ vk, **;k
fgekpy izns”k oDQ cksMZ ds ikl jftLVªhd`r oDQ lEifRr;ka** “kCnksa dk yksi fd;k tk,xkA
&&&&&&&&
AUTHORITATIVE ENGLISH TEXT
Act No. 1 of 2012
THE HIMACHAL PRADESH PUBLIC PREMISES AND LAND (EVICTION AND
RENT RECOVERY) AMENDMENT Act, 2011
(AS ASSENTED TO BY THE GOVERNOR ON 18
TH JANUARY, 2012)
AN
ACT
further to amend the Himachal Pradesh Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent
Recovery), Act, 1971 (Act No. 22 of 1971).
BE it enacted by the Legislative Assembly of Himachal Pradesh in the Sixty-second Year of
the Republic of the India as follows:—
1. Short title.—This Act may be called the Himachal Pradesh Public Premises and Land
(Eviction and Rent Recovery) Amendment Act, 2011.
2. Amendment of section 2.—In the Himachal Pradesh Public Premises and Land
(Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1971, in section 2, in clause (e), in sub-clause (i), the words
and sign “or a Wakf property, registered with the Himachal Pradesh Wakf Board” shall be
omitted.
5325
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
fof/k foHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f”keyk&2] 27 tuojh] 2012
la[;k ,y0,y0vkj0&Mh0 ¼6½&34@2011&yst-&fgekpy izns”k dh jkT;iky] Hkkjr ds lafo/kku ds
vuqPNsn 200 ds v/khu iznÙk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, fnukad 18&1&2012 dks vuqeksfnr fgekpy
izns”k uxj fuxe ¼f}rh; la”kks/ku½ fo/ks;d] 2011 ¼2011 dk fo/ks;d la[;kad 31½ dks o’kZ 2012 ds
vf/kfu;e la[;kad 4 ds :Ik esa lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 348 ¼3½ ds v/khu mlds vaxzsth izkf/kd`r ikB lfgr
fgekpy izns”k jkti= ¼vlk/kkj.k½ esa izdkf”kr djrh gSaA
vkns”k }kjk]
vorkj pUn Mksxjk]
iz/kku lfpo ¼fof/k½A
__________
2012 dk vf/kfu;e la[;kad 4
fgekpy izns”k uxj fuxe ¼f}rh; la”kks/ku½ vf/kfu;e] 2011
¼jkT;iky egksn;k }kjk rkjh[k 18 tuojh] 2012 dks ;Fkkvuqeksfnr½
fgekpy izns”k uxj fuxe vf/kfu;e] 1994 ¼1994 dk vf/kfu;e la[;kad 12½ dk vkSj la”kksèku
djus ds fy, vf/kfu;eA
Hkkjr x.kjkT; ds cklBosa o’kZ esa fgekpy izns”k fo/kku lHkk }kjk fuEufyf[kr :Ik esa ;g vfèkfu;fer
gks%&&
1- laf{kIr uke-&bl vf/kfu;e dk laf{kIr uke fgekpy izns”k uxj fuxe ¼f}rh; la”kks/ku½
vf/kfu;e] 2011 gSA
2-
/kkjk 36 dk la”kks/ku-&fgekpy izns”k uxj fuxe vf/kfu;e] 1994 dh /kkjk 36 dh mièkkjk
¼1½ ds izFke ijUrqd esa ^^vkSj mi&egkikSj** “kCnksa vkSj fpUg dk yksi fd;k tk,xkA
5326
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
AUTHORITATIVE ENGLISH TEXT
Act No. 4 of 2012
THE HIMACHAL PRADESH MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (SECOND
AMENDMENT) ACT, 2011
(AS ASSENTED TO BY THE GOVERNOR ON 18
TH JANUARY, 2012)
AN
ACT
further to amend the Himachal Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act 1994 (Act No.
12 of 1994).
BE it enacted by the Legislative Assembly of Himachal Pradesh in the Sixty-second Year of
the Republic of India as follows:—
1. Short title.—This Act may be called the Himachal Pradesh Municipal Corporation
(Second Amendment) Act, 2011.
2.
Amendment of section 36.—In section 36 of the Himachal Pradesh Municipal
Corporation Act, 1994, in sub-section (1), in first proviso, the words “and Deputy Mayor” shall be
omitted.
5327
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
fof/k foHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f”keyk&2] 27 tuojh] 2012
la[;k ,y0,y0vkj0&Mh0 ¼6½&31@2011&yst-&fgekpy izns”k dh jkT;iky] Hkkjr ds lafo/kku ds
vuqPNsn 200 ds v/khu iznÙk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, fnukad 18&1&2012 dks vuqeksfnr fgekpy
izns”k uxjikfydk lsok ¼la”kks/ku½ fo/ks;d] 2011 ¼2011 dk fo/ks;d la[;kad 27½ dks o’kZ 2012 ds
vf/kfu;e la[;kad 2 ds :Ik esa lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 348 ¼3½ ds v/khu mlds vaxzsth izkf/kd`r ikB lfgr
fgekpy izns”k jkti= ¼vlk/kkj.k½ esa izdkf”kr djrh gSaA
vkns”k }kjk]
vorkj pUn Mksxjk]
iz/kku lfpo ¼fof/k½A
&&&&&&&
2012 dk vf/kfu;e la[;kad 2
fgekpy izns”k uxjikfydk lsok ¼la”kks/ku½ vf/kfu;e] 2011
¼jkT;iky egksn;k }kjk rkjh[k 18 tuojh] 2012 dks ;Fkkvuqeksfnr½
fgekpy izns”k uxjikfydk lsok vf/kfu;e] 1994 ¼1994 dk vf/kfu;e la[;kad 11½ dk vkSj
la”kks/ku djus ds fy, vf/kfu;eA
Hkkjr x.kjkT; ds cklBosa o’kZ esa fgekpy izns”k fo/kku lHkk }kjk fuEufyf[kr :Ik esa ;g
vf/kfu;fer gks %&&
1-
laf{kIr uke-&bl vf/kfu;e dk laf{kIr uke fgekpy izns”k uxjikfydk lsok ¼la”kks/ku½
vf/kfu;e] 2011 gSA
2-
/kkjk 3 dk la”kks/ku-&fgekpy izns”k uxjikfydk lsok vf/kfu;e] 1994 dh /kkjk 3 esa]&&
¼d½ mi/kkjk ¼1½ ds LFkkUk ij fuEufyf[kr mi/kkjk j[kh tk,xh] vFkkZr~%&&
^^¼1½ fgekpy izns”k uxjikfydk vf/kfu;e] 1994 ds v/khu xfBr uxj iapk;rksa vkSj
uxjikfydk ifj’knksa esa vkSj bl vfèkfu;e dh vuqlwph&1 esa ;Fkk nf”kZr inksa ls
lekfo"V jkT; Lrjh; lsok gksxhA**( vkSj
¼[k½
mi/kkjk ¼3½ esa] ^^mi&/kkjk ¼1½ esa fufnZ’V** “kCnksa] fpUg] dks’Bd vkSj vad dk yksi fd;k
tk,xkA
5328
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
AUTHORITATIVE ENGLISH TEXT
Act No. 2 of 2012
THE HIMACHAL PRADESH MUNICIPAL SERVICES (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2011
(AS ASSENTED TO BY THE GOVERNOR ON 18
TH JANUARY, 2012)
AN
ACT
further to amend the Himachal Pradesh Municipal Services Act 1994 (Act No. 11 of 1994).
BE it enacted by the Legislative Assembly of Himachal Pradesh in the Sixty-second Year of
the Republic of India as follows:—
1.
Short title.—This Act may be called the Himachal Pradesh Municipal Services
(Amendment) Act, 2011.
2.
Amendment of section3.—In section 3 of the Himachal Pradesh Municipal
Services Act, 1994,—
(a) For sub-section (1), the following sub-section shall be substituted, namely:—
“(1) There shall be State Level Services comprising of the posts in Nagar Panchayats
and Municipal Councils, constituted under the Himachal Pradesh Municipal Act,
1994, and as shown in the Schedule-I to this Act.”; and
(b) In sub-section (3), the words, sign, brackets and figure “referred to in sub-section (1),”
shall be deleted.
5329
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
fof/k foHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f”keyk&2] 27 tuojh] 2012
la[;k ,y0,y0vkj0&Mh0 ¼6½&36@2011&yst-&fgekpy izns”k dh jkT;iky] Hkkjr ds lafo/kku ds
vuqPNsn 200 ds v/khu iznÙk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, fnukad 18&1&2012 dks vuqeksfnr fgekpy
izns”k vf/koDrk dY;k.k fuf/k ¼la”kks/ku½ fo/ks;d] 2011 ¼2011 dk fo/ks;d la[;kad 30½ dks o’kZ 2012 ds
vf/kfu;e la[;kad 3 ds :Ik esa lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 348 ¼3½ ds v/khu mlds vaxzsth izkf/kd`r ikB lfgr
fgekpy izns”k jkti= ¼vlk/kkj.k½ esa izdkf”kr djrh gSaA
vkns”k }kjk]
vorkj pUn Mksxjk]
iz/kku lfpo ¼fof/k½A
&&&&&&&
2012 dk vf/kfu;e la[;kad 3
fgekpy izns”k vf/koDrk dY;k.k fuf/k ¼la”kks/ku½ vf/kfu;e] 2011
¼jkT;iky egksn;k }kjk rkjh[k 18 tuojh] 2012 dks ;Fkkvuqeksfnr½
fgekpy izns”k vf/koDrk dY;k.k fuf/k vf/kfu;e] 1996 ¼1996 dk vfèkfu;e la[;kad 14½ dk vkSj
la”kks/ku djus ds fy, vf/kfu;eA
Hkkjr x.kjkT; ds cklBosa o’kZ esa fgekpy izns”k fo/kku lHkk }kjk fuEufyf[kr :Ik esa ;g
vf/kfu;fer gks %&
1-
laf{kIr uke-&bl vf/kfu;e dk laf{kIr uke fgekpy izns”k vf/koDrk dY;k.k fuf/k
¼la”kks/ku½ vf/kfu;e] 2011 gS A
2-
/kkjk 17 dk la”kks/ku-&fgekpy izns”k vf/koDrk dY;k.k fuf/k vf/kfu;e] 1996 dh /kkjk 17
dh mi/kkjk ¼4½ ds f}rh; ijUrqd esa] ^^2008^^] vadksa ds LFkku ij ^^2011^^ vad j[ks tk,axsA
5330
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
AUTHORITATIVE ENGLISH TEXT
Act No. 3 of 2012
THE HIMACHAL PRADESH ADVOCATES WELFARE FUND (AMENDMENT) ACT,
2011
(AS ASSENTED TO BY THE GOVERNOR ON 18
TH JANUARY, 2012)
AN
ACT
further to amend the Himachal Pradesh Advocates Welfare Fund Act, 1996 (Act No. 14 of
1996).
BE it enacted by the Legislative Assembly of Himachal Pradesh in the Sixty-second Year of
the Republic of India as follows :—
1.
Short title.—This Act may be called the Himachal Pradesh Advocates Welfare
Fund (Amendment) Act, 2011.
2.
Amendment of section 17.—In section 17 of the Himachal Pradesh Advocates
Welfare Fund Act, 1996, in sub-section (4), in the second proviso, for the figures “2008”, the
figures “2011” shall be substituted.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Gorkh Nath S/O Shri Subha Ram, R/O
Village Baral, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Gorkh Nath S/O Shri Subha Ram, R/O Village
Baral, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
5331
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Jagdish Chand S/O Shri Mani Ram, R/O
Village and P.O. Pehad, Sub Tehsil Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Jagdish Chand S/O Shri Mani Ram, R/O Village
and P.O. Pehad, Sub Tehsil Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Kamli Devi W/O Shri Duni Chand, R/O
Village and P.O. Sari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
5332
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Kamli Devi W/O Shri Duni Chand, R/O Village
and P.O. Sari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Beena Devi W/O Shri Lekh Ram, R/O
Village Fanel, P.O. Kujabhal, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Beena Devi W/O Shri Lekh Ram, R/O Village
Fanel, P.O. Kujabhal, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5333
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Parkash Chand S/O Shri Roop Lal R/O
Village Mahehar, P.O. Cholthara, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Parkash Chand S/O Shri Roop Lal R/O Village
Mahehar, P.O. Cholthara, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Beena Devi W/O Shri Ishwar Dass, R/O
Village Banwar, P.O. Dharampur, Sub Tehsil Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
5334
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Beena Devi W/O Shri Ishwar Dass, R/O Village
Banwar, P.O. Dharampur, Sub Tehsil Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
w.e.f. 08-07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is
legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named
workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Sarla Devi W/O Shri Sohan Singh, R/O
Village Thati, P.O. Kot, Sub Tehsil Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Sarla Devi W/O Shri Sohan Singh, R/O Village
Thati, P.O. Kot, Sub Tehsil Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5335
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Meera Devi W/O Shri Kashmir Singh, R/O
Village and P.O. Brang, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Meera Devi W/O Shri Kashmir Singh, R/O
Village and P.O. Brang, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Fulla Devi W/O Shri Parkash Chand R/O
Village Baral, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by theundersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, theundersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947)
5336
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Fulla Devi W/O Shri Parkash Chand R/O
Village Baral, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
w.e.f. 08-07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is
legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named
workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Dharampal S/O Shri Gokal Chand R/O
Village Pehad, P.O. Sari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Dharampal S/O Shri Gokal Chand R/O Village
Pehad, P.O. Sari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5337
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Sarla Devi W/O Shri Desh Raj R/O Village
Dadwal, P.O. Sidhpur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Sarla Devi W/O Shri Desh Raj R/O Village
Dadwal, P.O. Sidhpur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Leela Devi W/O Shri Budhi Singh, R/O
Village and P.O. Sakalana, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
5338
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Leela Devi W/O Shri Budhi Singh, R/O Village
and P.O. Sakalana, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Shashi Pal S/O Shri Prem Singh, R/O Village
Khajruti, P.O. Cholgarh, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Shashi Pal S/O Shri Prem Singh, R/O Village
Khajruti, P.O. Cholgarh, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5339
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Praveen Kumar S/O Shri Jagdish Chand R/O
Village Chapanu, P.O. Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Praveen Kumar S/O Shri Jagdish Chand R/O
Village Chapanu, P.O. Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
w.e.f. 08-07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is
legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named
workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Gian Chnd S/O Shri Guju Ram R/O Village
Kherhar, P.O. Hyun Pehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
5340
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Gian Chnd S/O Shri Guju Ram R/O Village
Kherhar, P.O. Hyun Pehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
w.e.f. 08-07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is
legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named
workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Brahmi Devi W/O Shri Bhag Singh, R/O
Village Gehra Trembla, P.O. Longni, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Brahmi Devi W/O Shri Bhag Singh, R/O
Village Gehra Trembla, P.O. Longni, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District
Mandi, H.P.w.e.f. 08-07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the
above named workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5341
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Alankrit S/O Shri Jindu Ram R/O Village
Ludhiyana, P.O. Pehad, Sub Tehsil Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Alankrit S/O Shri Jindu Ram R/O Village
Ludhiyana, P.O. Pehad, Sub Tehsil Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
w.e.f. 08-07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is
legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named
workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Heema Devi W/O Shri Himat Ram, R/O
Village Shanjair, P.O. Dhawali, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
5342
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Heema Devi W/O Shri Himat Ram, R/O Village
Shanjair, P.O. Dhawali, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Ranjit Singh S/O Shri Jagar Nath R/O Village
Tarun, P.O. Samouda, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Ranjit Singh S/O Shri Jagar Nath R/O Village
Tarun, P.O. Samouda, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5343
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Riyaz Khan S/O Shri Nurdeen R/O Village
Baral, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D.
(B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Shri Riyaz Khan S/O Shri Nurdeen R/O Village
Baral, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Atti Devi W/O Shri Sohan Lal, R/O Village
Gehra Trembla, P.O. Longni, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
5344
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Atti Devi W/O Shri Sohan Lal, R/O Village
Gehra Trembla, P.O. Longni, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
w.e.f. 08-07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is
legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named
workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Sudi Devi W/O Shri Raghu, R/O Village
Kapahi, P.O. Sari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D.
(B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Sudi Devi W/O Shri Raghu, R/O Village
Kapahi, P.O. Sari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5345
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Fulmu Devi W/O Shri Jai Singh, R/O Village
Baral, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D.
(B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Fulmu Devi W/O Shri Jai Singh, R/O Village
Baral, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Judiya Devi W/O Shri Guriya Ram, R/O
Village Kothi, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
5346
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Judiya Devi W/O Shri Guriya Ram, R/O Village
Kothi, P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 17th October, 2011
No. 11-6/85(Lab) I.D/2011-Shimla.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Anil Sharma R/O Ashwani Niwas, Near
Dhalli Tunnel, Shimla-12 Vs. The Manager, M/S Padmawati Balaji S.T.P.I. Kasumpti, Shimla-9,
H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla / Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether the termination of services of Shri Anil Sharma, Customer Care Officer, as per
demand notice drawing wages @ Rs. 3,000/- per month by the Manager, M/s Padmawati
Balaji S.T.P.I. Kasumpti, Shimla-9, H.P. w.e.f. 31-01-2010 without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, to what back
wages, service benefits and relief the above workman is entitled to from the above
employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5347
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 10th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exists between Shri Balbir Singh S/O Nirmal Singh, R/O Village
Nangran, Tehsil and District Una, H.P. Vs. The Conservator-cum-Project Director, Swan River
(I.W.M.) Project, Una, District Una, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla / Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether the verbal termination of services of Shri Balbir Singh S/O Nirmal Singh, R/O
Village Nangran, Tehsil and District Una, H.P. by the Conservator-cum-Project Director,
Swan River (I.W.M.) Project, Una, District Una, H.P. w.e.f. 08-06-2010 without notice,
charge sheet, holding enquiry and without complying with the provisions of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, to what
amount of back wages, past service benefits and relief the above named worker is entitled to
from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 25th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exists between Shri Beli Ram S/O Shri Gholi Ram, R/O Village
Nawahar, P.O. Bandhi, Sub Tehsil Aut, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. (1) The Pardhan, Gram Panchyat,
Bandhi, Sub Tehsil Aut, District Mandi, H.P. (2) The Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division,
Mandi, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
5348
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla / Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether the termination of services of Shri Beli Ram S/O Shri Gholi Ram, R/O Village
Nawahar, P.O. Bandhi, Sub Tehsil Aut, District Mandi, H.P., Water Guard by the (1) The
Pardhan, Gram Panchyat, Bandhi, Sub Tehsil Aut, District Mandi, H.P. (2) The Executive
Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. who was appointed in consultation
with and after approval of, as well as wages were disbursed by the Assistant Engineer,
I.&P.H. Division, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 05-04-2008 without complying the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 5th December, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Chintamani S/O Shri Diwas Kumar, R/O
Village Gehra, P.O. and Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Divisional Forest Officer,
Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether the verbal termination of services of Shri Chintamani S/O Shri Diwas Kumar,
R/O Village Gehra, P.O. and Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Divisional
Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. January,
2008 without serving notice, without holding enquiry and without complying with the
5349
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named worker is
entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 24th October, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Deep Kumar S/O Shri Dhyan Chand, R/O
Village Bhalerath, P.O. Goluwan, Tehsil Ladbharol, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Divisional Forest
Officer, Forest Division, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla / Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of services/giving breaks of Shri Deep Kumar S/O Shri Dhyan Chand
by the Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. from
time to time during year, 1998 to 2008 and finally terminated during 12-09-2008, as alleged
by the workman, (as the abandonments are not proved but admitting non-availability of
work during certain periods) is legal and justified? If not, what relief of back wages,
seniority and past service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above
employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 24th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exists between Shri Gurmail Singh S/O Shri Harnam Singh, R/O Village
5350
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
and P.O. Raipur Sahoda, District Una, H.P. Vs. The Managing Director, M/S Nipso Polyfabriks
Limited, Plot No.- 30-31, Industrial Area, Mehatpur, District Una, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether the verbal termination of services of Shri Gurmail Singh S/O Shri Harnam Singh,
R/O Village and P.O. Raipur Sahoda, District Una, H.P., Electrician, by the Managing
Director, M/S Nipso Polyfabriks Limited, Plot No.- 30-31, Industrial Area, Mehatpur,
District Una, H.P. w.e.f. 27-05-2010 without notice, charge sheet, holding of enquiry and
without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named worker is
entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 23rd November, 2011
No. 11-2/86(Lab) I.D/2011-Bilaspur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Jamuna Devi W/O Shri Munshi Ram, R/O
Village Panjail Kalan, P.O. and Sub Tehsil Namhol, District Bilaspur, H.P. Vs. (1) The
Headmaster, Government Primary School, Sohari, P.O. and Sub Tehsil Namhol, District Bilaspur,
H.P. (2) The Pardhan, School Development Managing Committee/PTA, Government Primary
School, Sohari, P.O. and Sub Tehsil Namhol, District Bilaspur, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla / Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
5351
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
“Whether the termination of services of Smt. Jamuna Devi W/O Shri Munshi Ram, R/O
Village Panjail Kalan, P.O. and Sub Tehsil Namhol, District Bilaspur, H.P., Helper, as per
demand notice drawing wages @ Rs. 1,000/- per month by the (1) The Headmaster,
Government Primary School, Sohari, P.O. and Sub Tehsil Namhol, District Bilaspur, H.P.
(2) The Pardhan, School Development Managing Committee/PTA, Government Primary
School, Sohari, P.O. and Sub Tehsil Namhol, District Bilaspur, H.P. vide notice dated 31-
03-2010 w.e.f. 01-04-2010 without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the
above worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 3rd December, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exists between Shri Karnail Singh S/O Shri Ranjeet Singh, R/O Village
Majra-Jhola, P.O. Polian, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. Vs. The Managing Director, M/S
Adinath Rubbers Private Limited, Industrial Area, Tahliwal, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla / Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether the retrenchment of services of Shri Karnail Singh S/O Shri Ranjeet Singh, R/O
Village Majra-Jhola, P.O. Polian, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. (Helper) by the
Managing Director, M/S Adinath Rubbers Private Limited, Industrial Area, Tahliwal, Tehsil
Haroli, District Una, H.P. w.e.f. 10-07-2010 after paying him Rs. 8,062/- as full and final
settlement as per provisions of all applicable Acts and Rules is proper and justified? If not,
what amount of back wages, seniority and past service benefits the above Ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5352
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 tuojh] 2012@8 ek?k] 1933
LOCAL AUDIT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-9, 29th January, 2012
No. 1-255/74-Fin (LA) Vol-7-490.—On the recommendation of the Departmental
promotion Committee, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to promote S/Shri Tara Chand,
Suresh Chand Gupta and Rakesh Kalra, Section Officer of Local Audit Department, Himachal
Pradesh (Class-II-Gazetted) in the Pay Band of ` 10300-34800+ ` 4400 Grade Pay to the post of
Assistant Director/Assistant Controller (Class-I-Gazetted) in the Pay Band of `10300-34800+
` 5000 Grade Pay with immediate effect.
2.
Consequent upon the above promotions, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased
to order following posting and transfers:-
Sr.
No.
Name
From
To
1.
Sh. Tara Chand
Resident
Audit
Scheme,
Market Committee, Kullu
Audit of Misc. Institutions
with H.Q. At Shimla.
2.
Sh. Suresh Chand Gupta
Audit Circle, Shimla with H.
Q. At Shimla.
Audit of Misc. Institutions
with H.Q. At Shimla.
3.
Sh. Rakesh Kalra
Rural
Development
Department, H. P. Shimla-9.
Audit of Misc. Institutions
with H.Q. At Shimla.
3.
The above officers may submit their option for fixation of pay under Rule F.R.22 (I)
(a) (i) within one month from the date of issue of this office order.
4.
They will remain on probation for a period of two years.
By order,
Sd/-
Pr. Secretary (Finance).
fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr