jkti=] fgekpy izns'k
fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr
f”keyk] lkseokj 30 tuojh] 2012@10 ek?k 1933
fgekpy izns'k ljdkj
TOURISM AND CIVIL AVIATION DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, 30th January, 2012
No. Tsm-F(6)-3/2001-II.—In supersession of this department’s notification (s) No.Tsm-
F(6)-3/2001-loose dated 28.5.2007, the Governor of Himachal Pradesh, in exercise of the powers
vested in her under rule-6 & 8 of the Himachal Pradesh Aero Sports Rules, 2004 read with
H.P.Aero Sports (Amendment) Rules, 2008, is pleased to constitute a Technical Committee having
jurisdiction over the whole of the State and a Regulatory Committee for each Aero Sport site as
under :-
Technical Committee :
1.
Commissioner-cum-Director, Tourism
Chairman
2.
Director, Western Himalayan Mountaineering Institute, Manali
Vice-Chairman
3.
Representative of State Aero Sports Association
Member
221&jkti=@2012&30&1&2012 ¼5353½
5354
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 30 tuojh] 2012@10 ek?k] 1933
4.
Representative of Aero Sports of India
Member
5.
One member each from the Registered Association in Himachal
Pradesh/Concerned District Association
Member
6.
Representative of Chief Medical Officer of concerned area
Member
7.
District Tourism Development Officer/Assistant Tourism
Development Officer of the concerned area.
Member-
Secretary”.
Regulatory Committee :
1.
Deputy Commissioner of the concerned District
Chairman
2.
Superintendent of Police of the concerned District or his nominee
Member
3.
Sub-Divisional Officer (Civil) of concerned District or his nominee
Member
4.
Medical Officer of the concerned area
Member
5.
Representative of the District Aero Sports Association/registered Aero
Sports association of the concerned Area
Member
6.
District Tourism Development Officer/Assistant Tourism Development
Officer of the Concerned District
Member
Secretary.”
The scope of works of so constituted Committees is defined in the Himachal Pradesh Aero
Sports Rules, 2004 (amended from time to time).
The non-official members in such committees have already been nominated vide this
department’s of even number dated 31.7.2009.
By order,
MANISHA NANDA,
Pr.Secretary(Tourism & CA).
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 23rd November, 2011
No. 11-1/11(Lab) I.D/2011-Nurpur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Kartar Singh S/O Shri Bir Singh R/O Village
and P.O. Lodhwan, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. Vs. The Factory Manager, M/s United
Wire Products, Village and P.O. Lodhwan, District Kangra, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla / Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
5355
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 30 tuojh] 2012@10 ek?k] 1933
“Whether the verbal termination of services of Shri Kartar Singh S/O Shri Bir Singh R/O
Village and P.O. Lodhwan, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., Labourer, by the Factory
Manager, M/s United Wire Products, Village and P.O. Lodhwan, District Kangra, H.P.
w.e.f. 10-04-2009 without serving notice, without holding enquiry and without complying
with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal
and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named
worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Marahaju Devi W/O Shri Jagat Ram, R/O
Village Gehra Trembla, P.O. Longni, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, theundersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Marahaju Devi W/O Shri Jagat Ram, R/O
Village Gehra Trembla, P.O. Longni, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District
Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the
above named workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5356
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 30 tuojh] 2012@10 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 9th December, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Panjabi Devi W/O Shri Ram Saran, R/O
Village Kapahi, P.O. Sari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Panjabi Devi W/O Shri Ram Saran, R/O Village
Kapahi, P.O. Sari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 13th October, 2011
No. 11-1/85(Lab) I.D/2011-Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Paramjeet Singh S/O Shri Badan Singh
Pathania, R/O Village & Post Office Malnoo, Tehsil Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. Vs. The Vice
Chancellor, Chaudhry Sarwan Kumar, Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishva Vidyalya, Palampur,
District Kangra, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
5357
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 30 tuojh] 2012@10 ek?k] 1933
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether the verbal termination of services of Shri Paramjeet Singh S/O Shri Badan Singh
Pathania daily wages worker by the Vice Chancellor, Chaudhry Sarwan Kumar, Himachal
Pradesh Krishi Vishva Vidyalya, Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. April, 2010 without
serving notice, without holding enquiry and without complying with the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, to
what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named daily wages worker is entitled
to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, July, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Puran Chand S/O Shri Param R/O Village
Shiva Badar, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer, I.& P.H. Division,
Mandi, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla / Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination by verbal orders of the services of Shri Puran Chand S/O Shri Param
by the Executive Engineer, I.& P.H. Division, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. August,
2004 without serving advance notice, without paying compensation, without holding
enquiry, thus without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is
legal and justified? If not, to what amount of back wages, past service benefits and relief the
above workman is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5358
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 30 tuojh] 2012@10 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 23rd November, 2011
No. 11-3/93(Lab) I.D/2011-Kullu.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exists between Shri Rajesh Kumar S/O Shri Changa Ram, R/O Village &
P.O. Shamshi, District Kullu, H.P. Vs. The Divisional Forest Officer, Parvati Forest Division,
Shamshi, District Kullu, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla / Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether the verbal termination of services of Shri Rajesh Kumar S/O Shri Changa Ram,
Village & P.O. Shamshi, District Kullu, H.P. part time sweeper by the Divisional Forest
Officer, Parvati Forest Division, Shamshi, District Kullu, H.P. w.e.f. 01-06-2010 without
complying with the provisionsSection 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named worker is
entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, July, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Rama Devi W/O Shri Inder Singh R/O
Village & P.O. Tandu, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The District Panchyat Officer,
Mandi, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
5359
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 30 tuojh] 2012@10 ek?k] 1933
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether the termination of services of Smt. Rama Devi W/O Shri Inder Singh by the
District Panchyat Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 01-12-2009 without serving advance
notice, without payment of compensation, thus without complying with the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, to what amount of back wages, past
service benefits and relief the above named worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 19th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exists between Shri Raman Kumar S/O Bakhtawar Singh, R/O Village
and P.O. Polian-Bheet, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. Vs. The Managing Director, M/S Adinath
Rubbers Private Limited, Industrial Area, Tahliwal, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether the retrenchment of services of Shri Raman Kumar S/O Bakhtawar Singh, R/O
Village and P.O. Polian-Bheet, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. (Helper) by the Managing
Director, M/S Adinath Rubbers Private Limited, Industrial Area, Tahliwal, Tehsil Haroli,
District Una, H.P. w.e.f. 10-07-2010 after paying him Rs. 7,082/- as full and final settlement
is proper and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority and past service
benefits the above Ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5360
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 30 tuojh] 2012@10 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 5th December, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exists between Shri Rohit Kumar S/O Shri Jagtar Singh, R/O Village and
P.O. Duleher, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. Vs. The Managing Director, M/S Adinath Rubbers
Private Limited, Industrial Area, Tahliwal, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla / Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether the retrenchment of services of Shri Rohit Kumar S/O Shri Jagtar Singh, R/O
Village and P.O. Duleher, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. (Helper) by the Managing
Director, M/S Adinath Rubbers Private Limited, Industrial Area, Tahliwal, Tehsil Haroli,
District Una, H.P. w.e.f. 10-07-2010 after paying him Rs. 7,326/- as full and final settlement
as per provisions of all applicable Acts and Rules is proper and justified? If not, what
amount of back wages, seniority and past service benefits the above Ex-worker is entitled to
from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 19th October, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Saran Pat S/O Shri Ram Dhan, R/O Village
Thalana, P.O. Bandhi, Sub Tehsil Aut, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. (1) The Pardhan, Gram Panchyat
Bandhi, Sub Tehsil Aut, District Mandi, H.P. (2) The Executive Engineer, I.& P.H. Division,
Mandi, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
5361
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 30 tuojh] 2012@10 ek?k] 1933
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether the termination of services of Shri Saran Pat S/O Shri Ram Dhan Water Guard by
the (1) The Pardhan, Gram Panchyat Bandhi, Sub Tehsil Aut, District Mandi, H.P. and (2)
The Executive Engineer, I. & P.H. Division, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. who was
appointed in consultation with and after approval of, as well as, wages were reimbursed by
the Assistant Engineer, I.& P.H. Division, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 07-04-2008
without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by
the workman, is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief
the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 29th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Sukri Devi W/O Shri Prem Singh, R/O Gehra
Trembla, P.O. Longni, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Sukri Devi W/O Shri Prem Singh, R/O Gehra
Trembla, P.O. Longni, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-
07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman
is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5362
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 30 tuojh] 2012@10 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 3rd December, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exists between Shri Surinder Singh S/O Shri Banta Singh, R/O Village
Malluwal, P.O. Polian-Bheet, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. Vs. The Managing Director, M/S
Adinath Rubbers Private Limited, Industrial Area, Tahliwal, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether the retrenchment of services of Shri Surinder Singh S/O Shri Banta Singh, R/O
Village Malluwal, P.O. Polian-Bheet, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. (Helper) by the
Managing Director, M/S Adinath Rubbers Private Limited, Industrial Area, Tahliwal, Tehsil
Haroli, District Una, H.P. w.e.f. 10-07-2010 after paying him Rs. 8,478/- as full and final
settlement as per provisions of all applicable Acts and Rules is proper and justified? If not,
what amount of back wages, seniority and past service benefits the above Ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 23rd November, 2011
No. 11-6/85(Lab) I.D/2011-Shimla.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Vrinder Thakur R/O House No. C-19/100,
Lower Phagli, Shimla-4 Vs. The Manager, M/S Padmawati Balaji S.T.P.I. Kasumpti, Shimla-9,
H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
5363
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 30 tuojh] 2012@10 ek?k] 1933
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether the termination of services of Shri Vrinder Thakur R/O House No. C-19/100,
Lower Phagli, Shimla-4, Customer Care Officer, as per demand notice drawing wages @
Rs. 3,000/- per month by the Manager, M/s Padmawati Balaji S.T.P.I. Kasumpti, Shimla-9,
H.P. w.e.f. 31-01-2010 without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the
above workman is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 8th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2010/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exist between Sh. Ajit Sharma S/O Sh. Brij Lal Sharma R/O Village
Narkheda ( Theru), P.O. Nara, Tehsil Barsar, Distt. Hamirpur, H.P. V/s The Factory Manager, M/s
Rangar Breweries Ltd. Plot No. 1 & 130, Industrial Area, Mehatpur, Distt. Una, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Ajit Sharma S/O Sh. Brij Lal Sharma (Helper)
R/O Village Narkheda ( Theru), P.O. Nara, Tehsil Barsar, Distt. Hamirpur (H.P.) by The
Factory Manager, M/s Rangar Breweries Ltd. Plot No. 1 & 130, Industrial Area, Mehatpur,
Distt. Una, (H.P.) w.e.f. 27.9.2009 without complying with the provisions of natural justice
& Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, seniority,
service benefits and relief the above named workman is entitled to ?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5364
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 30 tuojh] 2012@10 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 29th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes
about the following issue exist between Smt. Barfi Devi W/O Sh. Biri Singh, Village Kohan, P.O.
Sajao Piplu, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R)
Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned andas per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Barfi Devi W/O Sh. Biri Singh, Village Kohan,
P.O. Sajao Piplu, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD
Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005, without
following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not,
what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above
Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 29th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes
about the following issue exist between Sh. Nand Lal S/O Sh. Lobhi Ram, Village Sanour, P.O.
Sari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R) Division
Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
5365
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 30 tuojh] 2012@10 ek?k] 1933
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Nand Lal S/O Sh. Lobhi Ram, Village Sanour,
P.O. Sari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD
Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, w.e.f. 08.7.2005, without following
the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what
amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above Ex-
Worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes
about the following issue exist between Sh. Chaudhary Ram S/O Sh. Noopa Ram, Village-
Naraingarh, P.O. Tanehar, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer,
HPPWD( B & R) Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Chaudhary Ram S/O Sh. Noopa Ram, Village-
Naraingarh, P.O. Tanehar, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
HPPWD Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005,
without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified?
If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5366
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 30 tuojh] 2012@10 ek?k] 1933
DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes
about the following issue exist between Smt. Fulmu Devi W/O Sh. Chaudhary Ram, Village & Post
Office Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R)
Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Fulmu Devi W/O Sh. Chaudhary Ram, Village
& Post Office Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
HPPWD Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005,
without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified?
If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes
about the following issue exist between Smt. Rani Devi W/O Sh. Balbir Singh, Village- Tarun,
P.O. Samour, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R)
Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
5367
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 30 tuojh] 2012@10 ek?k] 1933
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Rani Devi W/O Sh. Balbir Singh, Village-
Tarun, P.O. Samour, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. by the ExecutiveEngineer,
HPPWD Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005,
without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified?
If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes
about the following issue exist between Sh. Bachitar Singh S/O Sh. Hirda Ram, R/O Village & Post
Office Brang, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R)
Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Bachitar Singh S/O Sh. Hirda Ram, R/O Village
& Post Office Brang, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
HPPWD Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005,
without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified?
If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5368
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 30 tuojh] 2012@10 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes
about the following issue exist between Sh. Ravi Dass S/O Sh. Harji Ram, Village Jangel, P.O.
Kot, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R) Division
Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Ravi Dass S/O Sh. Harji Ram, Village Jangel,
P.O. Kot, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD
Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005, without
following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not,
what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above
Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 14th November, 2011
No. 11-1/86(Lab) ID/11/Paonta.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exist between 1.) Sh. Dev Raj S/O Sh. Punnu Ram, VPO Dhaula Kuan,
Distt. Sirmour, H.P. 2.) Sh. Sharafat Ali S/O Sh. Mohammad Ali, R/O VPO Rajgarh, District
Sirmour, H.P. 3.) Sh. Firoz Khan S/O Sh. Asgar Ali R/O Rampur Banjaran, P.O. Dhaula Kuan,
District Sirmour, H.P 4.) Ms. Rukmani Devi D/O Sh. Netar Singh, R/O VPO Kolar, Tehsil Paonta
Sahib, Distt. Sirmour, H.P. V/s The Fruit Technologist, Dhaula Kuan, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, Distt.
Sirmour, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
5369
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 30 tuojh] 2012@10 ek?k] 1933
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under
Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of S/Sh. Dev Raj S/O Sh. Punnu Ram, Sharafat Ali
S/O Sh. Mohammad Ali, Firoz Khan S/O Sh. Asgar Ali and Ms. Rukmani Devi D/O Sh.
Netar Singh by The Fruit Technologist, Dhaula Kuan, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, Distt. Sirmour,
H.P. w.e.f. 07.8.2009 without issuing charge sheet, conducting enquiry and without
following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal andjustified? If not,
what service benefits and relief the above named workmen are entitled to from above
employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes
about the following issue exist between Sh. Dharam Chand S/O Sh. Inder Singh, Village Jhareda,
P.O. Pehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R)
Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Dharam Chand S/O Sh. Inder Singh, Village
Jhareda, P.O. Pehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD
Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005, without
following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not,
what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above
Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5370
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 30 tuojh] 2012@10 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes
about the following issue exist between Sh. Raj Kumar S/O Sh. Sohan Singh, Village-Bhatour, P.O.
Pehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R)
Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
underSection-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Raj Kumar S/O Sh. Sohan Singh, Village-
Bhatour, P.O. Pehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
HPPWD Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005,
without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified?
If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes
about the following issue exist between Sh. Lachhman Singh S/O Sh. Bela Singh, Village-
Langehar, P.O. Giyun, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD(
B & R) Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
5371
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 30 tuojh] 2012@10 ek?k] 1933
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Lachhman Singh S/O Sh. Bela Ram, Village-
Langehar, P.O. Giyun, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
HPPWD Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. March, 2004,
without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified?
If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes
about the following issue exist between Sh. Sher Singh S/O Sh. Gurdial Singh, R/O Village Thati,
P.O. Kot, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R)
Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Sher Singh S/O Sh. Gurdial Singh, R/O Village
Thati, P.O. Kot, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD
Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005, without
following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not,
what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above
Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5372
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 30 tuojh] 2012@10 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes
about the following issue exist between Smt. Panchu Devi W/O Sh. Tek Chand , VPO Kot, Tehsil
Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R) Division Dharampur,
Distt. Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Panchu Devi W/O Sh. Tek Chand , VPO Kot,
Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division Dharampur,
Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005, without following the provisions of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above Ex-Worker is entitled to from
the aboveemployer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes
about the following issue exist between Sh. Dabar Singh S/O Sh. Brij Lal, Village Langehar , P.O.
Giyun, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R)
Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
5373
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 30 tuojh] 2012@10 ek?k] 1933
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Dabar Singh S/O Sh. Brij Lal, Village Langehar ,
P.O. Giyun, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division
Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005, without following the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above Ex-Worker is
entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes
about the following issue exist between Sh. Ramesh Chand S/O Sh. Dev Raj, Village-Malhi
Banwar, P.O. Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer,
HPPWD( B & R) Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Ramesh Chand S/O Sh. Dev Raj, Village-Malhi
Banwar, P.O. Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
HPPWD Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005,
without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified?
If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5374
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 30 tuojh] 2012@10 ek?k] 1933
In the Court of Shri Balbir Thakur HAS, Special Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Manali, District Kullu, Himachal Pradesh
In the matter of :—
Sh. Paras Ram s/o Sh. Kalu Ram, r/o Village and P.O. Baragran, Tehsil Manali, District
Kullu, H.P.
Smt. Nisha d/o Sh. Khekh Ram, r/o Village Bagan, P.O. Barahi, Tehsil and District Kullu,
H.P. presently w/o Sh. Paras Ram s/o Sh. Kalu Ram, r/o Village and P.O. Baragran, Tehsil
Manali, District Kullu, H.P.
Versus
General Public
Application for the registeration of Marriage Under Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Sh. Paras Ram s/o Sh. Kalu Ram, r/o Village and P.O. Baragran, Tehsil Manali, District
Kullu, H.P. and Smt. Nisha d/o Sh. Khekh Ram, r/o Village Bagan, P.O. Barahi, Tehsil and District
Kullu, H.P. presently w/o Sh. Paras Ram s/o Sh. Kalu Ram, r/o Village and P.O. Baragran, Tehsil
Manali, District Kullu, H.P. has presented an application on 2-1-2012 in this court for the
registration of marriage under Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Hence this proclamation is hereby issued for the information of General Public that if any
persons have any objections for the registration of the above marriage can appear in this court on or
before 1-2-2012 at 2.00 P.M. to object registration of marriage personally or through an authorized
agent failing which this marriage will be registered under this Act, 1954 accordinngly.
Given under my hand and seal of this Court on 2-1-2012.
Seal.
BALBIR THAKUR HAS,
Special Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Manali, District Kullu, Himachal Pradesh.
_________
In the Court of Shri Sudesh Kumar Mokhta IAS, Special Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional
Magistrate, Padhar, District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh
File No. 02 of 2012
Instituted on : 10-1-2012
Next date of hearing : 31-1-2012
In the matter of :—
1.
Sh. Mukesh s/o Sh. Dharam Singh r/o Village Ropi, P.O. Padhar, Tehsil Padhar,
District Mandi, H.P.
2.
Smt. Sita Devi d/o Sh. Lekh Raj, r/o Village Bid, P.O. Gahar, Tehsil Sarkaghat,
District Mandi, H.P.
. .Applicants.
Versus
General Public
. .Respondents.
5375
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 30 tuojh] 2012@10 ek?k] 1933
Application for the registeration of Marriage under Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Whereas Sh. Mukesh s/o Sh. Dharam Singh r/o Village Ropi, P.O. Padhar, Tehsil Padhar,
District Mandi, H.P. and Smt. Sita Devi d/o Sh. Lekh Raj, r/o Village Bid, P.O. Gahar, Tehsil
Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Both have presented an application for the registration of their
marriage under Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Hence this proclamation is hereby issued for the information of general public that if any
persons have any objections for the registration of the above marriage can appear in this court on or
before 31-1-2012 at 10.00 A.M. to object registration of marriage personally or through an
authorized agent failing which this marriage will be registered under this Act, 1954 accordingly.
Given under my hand and seal of this Court on 10-1-2012.
Seal.
Sudesh Kumar Mokhta IAS,
Special Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Padhar, District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh.
_________
In the Court of Shri Sudesh Kumar Mokhta IAS, Special Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional
Magistrate, Padhar, District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh
File No. 01 of 2012
Instituted on : 10-1-2012
Next date of hearing : 31-1-2012
In the matter of :—
1.
Sh. Krishan Chand s/o Sh. Amar Nath r/o Village Babli, P.O. Padwahan, Tehsil
Padhar, District Mandi, H.P.
2.
Tanu d/o Sh. Bhadar Singh, r/o Village Silhgikhad, P.O. Kufari, Tehsil Padhar,
District Mandi, H.P.
. .Applicants.
Versus
General Public
. .Respondents.
Application for the registeration of Marriage under Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Whereas Sh. Krishan Chand s/o Sh. Amar Nath r/o Village Babli, P.O. Padwahan, Tehsil
Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. and Tanu d/o Sh. Bhadar Singh, r/o Village Silhgikhad, P.O. Kufari,
Tehsil Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. Both have presented an application for the registration of their
marriage under Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Hence this proclamation is hereby issued for the information of general public that if any
persons have any objections for the registration of the above marriage can appear in this court on or
before 31-1-2012 at 10.00 A.M. to object registration of marriage personally or through an
authorized agent failing which this marriage will be registered under this Act, 1954 accordingly.
Given under my hand and seal of this Court on 10-1-2012.
Seal.
Sudesh Kumar Mokhta IAS,
Special Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Padhar, District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh.
5376
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 30 tuojh] 2012@10 ek?k] 1933
uke ifjorZu
loZlk/kkj.k dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd eSa] eukst dqekj] vk;q 34 o"kZ lqiq= Lo0 Jh ek/ko 'kekZ]
fuoklh xkao vkath] Mkd?kj pk;yh] rglhy o ftyk f'keyk us vius lqiq= n{k dk uke cnydj nsokax
j[k fy;k gSA vr% Hkfo"; esa mls nsokax ds uke ls tkuk tk,A
eukst dqekj]
lqiq= Lo0 Jh ek/ko 'kekZ] fuoklh xkao vkath]
Mkd?kj pk;yh] rglhy o ftyk f'keykA
fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr