jkti=] fgekpy izns'k
fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr
f”keyk] eaxyokj 31 tuojh] 2012@11 ek?k 1933
fgekpy izns'k ljdkj
cgqmÌs”kh; ifj;kstuk,sa ,oa fo|qr foHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f”keyk&2] 23 tuojh] 2012-
la[;k % fo|qr&N ¼5½&71@2011-&;r% fgekpy izns”k ds jkT;iky dks ;g izrhr gskrk gS fd
fgekpy izns”k jkT; fo|qr ifj’kn~ fyfeVsM] tks fd Hkwfe vtZu vf/kfu;e 1894 ¼1894 dk igyk
vf/kfu;e½ dh /kkjk 3 ds [k.M ¼lh-lh-½ ds vUrxZr ljdkj ds LokfeRo vkSj fu;U=.k ds v/khu ,d fuxe
gS] ds }kjk vius O;; ij lkoZtfud iz;kstu gsrq uked eqgky lugkyh] rglhy yM+HkM+ksy] ftyk e.M+h]
fgekpy izns”k esa mgy ty fo|qr ifj;kstuk ¼r`rh; pj.k½ ds fuekZ.k gsrq Hkwfe vftZr djuh vko”;d gSaA
vr,oa ,rn~}kjk ;g vf/klwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd mDr ifj{ks= esa tSlk fd fuEu fooj.kh esa fufnZ’V fd;k
x;k gS mijksDr iz;kstu ds fy, Hkwfe dk vtZu visf{kr gSA
2-
;g vf/klwpuk ,sls lHkh O;fDr;ksa dks] tks blls lEcfU/kr gSa ;k gks ldrs gSa] dh tkudkjh
ds fy, Hkw&vtZu vf/kfu;e] 1894 dh /kkjk&4 ds micU/kksa ds vUrxZr tkjh dh tkrh gSA
222&jkti=@2012&31&1&2012 ¼5377½
5378
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 31 tuojh] 2012@11 ek?k] 1933
3-
iwoksZDr /kkjk }kjk iznRr “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, jkT;iky] fgekpy izns”k bl le;
bl midze esa dk;Zjr lHkh vf/kdkfj;ksa] muds deZpkfj;ksa vkSj Jfedksa dks bykds dh fdlh Hkh Hkwfe esa
izos”k djus rFkk losZ{k.k djus vkSj ml /kkjk }kjk visf{kr vFkok vuqer% lHkh vU; dk;ksZa dks djus ds
fy, lg’kZ izkf/kdkj nsrs gSaA
4-
dksbZ Hkh ,slk fgrc) O;fDr ftls mDr ifj{ks= esa dfFkr Hkwfe ds vtZu ij dksbZ vkifRr
gks rks og bl vf/klwpuk ds izdkf”kr gksus ds 30 fnuksa dh vof/k ds Hkhrj fyf[kr :i esa Hkw&vtZu
lekgrkZ] fgekpy izns”k jkT; fo|qr ifj’kn~ fyfeVsM] ;qfuV&2] e.Mh] fgekpy izns”k ds le{k viuh
vkifRr ntZ dj ldrk gSA
fooj.kh
ftyk
rglhy
eqgky
[kljk uEcj
jdck ¼ch/kksa esa½
e.Mh
yM+HkM+ksy
lugkyh@208
838@2
00&05&17
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
dqy fdRrk& 1
dqy jdok& 00&05&17
vkns”k }kjk]
gLrk{kfjr@&
iz/kku lfpo ¼fo|qr½A
&&&&&&&
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 15th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2010-Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exist between Sh. Jasveer Kumar S/O Sh. Surender Nath, VPO Raipur
Sohad, Tehsil & Distt. Una, H.P. V/s The Factory Manager, M/s Rangar Breweries Ltd. Plot No. 1
& 130 Industrial Area, Mehatpur, Distt. Una, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
1.
“Whether claim of Sh. Jasveer Kumar S/O Sh. Surender Nath ( Ex-Worker), VPO
Raipur Sohad, Tehsil & Distt. Una, H.P. that he worked with M/s Rangar Breweries
Ltd. Plot No. 1 & 130 Industrial Area, Mehatpur, Distt. Una from year, 2004
onwards as temporary fitter; whereas above management has denied the same, is
proper and justified? If yes, what service benefits the above workman is entitled to
from the above employer/management?”
5379
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 31 tuojh] 2012@11 ek?k] 1933
2. “ Whether the termination of the services of Sh. Jasveer Kumar S/O Sh. Surender Nath (
Ex-Worker), VPO Raipur Sohad, Tehsil & Distt. Una by the Factory Manager, M/s
Rangar Breweries Ltd. Plot No. 1 & 130 Industrial Area, Mehatpur, Distt. Una, H.P.
w.e.f. 07.12.2009 without holding any enquiry and without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, to what
back wages, seniority, service benefits and relief the above named workman is entitled
to?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 16th November, 2011
No. 11-6/85(Lab) ID/Shimla/2011.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Kamal Deep Bhatia S/O Sh. H.S. Bhatia R/O
Roop Colony, Village –Chailey, Near Mehli, Tehsil & Distt. Shimla, H.P. V/s The Managing
Director, Agro Industrial Packaging India Ltd. Nigam Vihar, Shimla, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under
Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Kamal Deep Bhatia S/O Sh. H.S. Bhatia by the
Managing Director, Agro Industrial Packaging India Ltd. Nigam Vihar, Shimla, ( H.P.)
w.e.f. 31.8.1998 without complying the provisions of section 25-F, 25-G & 25-H of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, to what back wages, service
benefits, and relief the above named workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 8th November, 2011
No. 11-2/93(Lab) ID/Solan/2011.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exist between President/ General Secretary, Kamla Dial Workers Union,
(Reg. No. 322) Parwanoo, Distt. Solan, H.P. V/s Management of Kamla Dial & Devices Ltd.
Sector-3,Parwanoo, Distt. Solan, H.P.
5380
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 31 tuojh] 2012@11 ek?k] 1933
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under
Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether miscellaneous demands raised by the Kamla Dial Workers Union, (Reg. No. 322)
Parwanoo, Distt. Solan, H.P. before the Management of M/s Kamla Dial & Devices Ltd.
Sector-3,Parwanoo, Distt. Solan, H.P. vide demand notice dated- 04.12.2010 (Copy-
Enclosed) are proper and justified? If yes, what relief the aggrieved workmen are entitled
to? If not, what its effects?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
__________
DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes
about the following issue exist between Sh. Makhan Singh S/O Sh. Ram Kishan, Village & P.O.
Pubowal, Tehsil Haroli, Distt. Una, H.P. V/S The Factory Manager, M/s Saber Papers Limited,
Village & Post Office Gondpur Bulla, Tehsil Haroli, Distt. Una, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Makhan Singh S/O Sh. Ram Kishan, Village &
P.O. Pubowal, Tehsil Haroli, Distt. Una w.e.f. 12.8.2010 by the management of M/s Saber
Papers Limited, Village & Post Office Gondpur Bulla, Tehsil Haroli, Distt. Una, H.P.
without issuing charge sheet, without conducting enquiry, without paying compensation and
without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified?
If not, to what relief, compensation & other service benefits the above aggrieved workman
is entitled to?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5381
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 31 tuojh] 2012@11 ek?k] 1933
DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes
about the following issue exist between Sh. Pawan Kumar S/O Sh. Faquir Chand, VPO Gondpur
Bulla, Tehsil Haroli, Distt. Una, H.P. V/S The Factory Manager, M/s Saber Papers Limited, Village
& Post Office Gondpur Bulla, Tehsil Haroli, Distt. Una, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Pawan Kumar S/O Sh. Faquir Chand, VPO
Gondpur Bulla, Tehsil Haroli, Distt. Una, H.P. w.e.f. 12.8.2010 by the management of M/s
Saber Papers Limited, Village & Post Office Gondpur Bulla, Tehsil Haroli, Distt. Una, H.P.
without issuing charge sheet, without conducting enquiry, without paying compensation and
without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified?
If not, to what relief, compensation & other service benefits the above aggrieved workman
is entitled to?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes
about the following issue exist between Sh. Raj Kumar S/O Sh. Bhagat Ram, VPO Gondpur Bulla,
Tehsil Haroli, Distt. Una, H.P. V/S The Factory Manager, M/s Saber Papers Limited, Village &
Post Office Gondpur Bulla, Tehsil Haroli, Distt. Una, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
5382
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 31 tuojh] 2012@11 ek?k] 1933
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Raj Kumar S/O Sh. Bhagat Ram, VPO Gondpur
Bulla, Tehsil Haroli, Distt. Una, w.e.f. 12.8.2010 by the management of M/s Saber Papers
Limited, Village & Post Office Gondpur Bulla, Tehsil Haroli, Distt. Una, H.P. without
issuing charge sheet, without conducting enquiry, without paying compensation and without
following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, to
what relief, compensation & other service benefits the above aggrieved workman is entitled
to?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
+
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes
about the following issue exist between Sh. Mangat Ram S/O Sh. Achhar Ram, VPO Gondpur,
Tehsil Haroli, Distt. Una, H.P. V/S The Factory Manager, M/s Saber Papers Limited, Village &
Post Office Gondpur Bulla, Tehsil Haroli, Distt. Una, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Mangat Ram S/O Sh. Achhar Ram, VPO
Gondpur, Tehsil Haroli, Distt. Una, w.e.f. 24.7.2010 by the management of M/s Saber
Papers Limited, Village & Post Office Gondpur Bulla, Tehsil Haroli, Distt. Una, H.P.
without issuing charge sheet, without conducting enquiry, without paying compensation and
without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified?
If not, to what relief, compensation & other service benefits the above aggrieved workman
is entitled to?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5383
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 31 tuojh] 2012@11 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes
about the following issue exist between Sh. Pardeep Singh S/O Sh. Narinder Singh, VPO Dulehar,
Tehsil Haroli, Distt. Una, H.P. V/S The Factory Manager, M/s Saber Papers Limited, Village &
Post Office Gondpur Bulla, Tehsil Haroli, Distt. Una, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Pardeep Singh S/O Sh. Narinder Singh, VPO
Dulehar, Tehsil Haroli, Distt. Una w.e.f. 12.8.2010 by the management of M/s Saber Papers
Limited, Village & Post Office Gondpur Bulla, Tehsil Haroli, Distt. Una, H.P. without
issuing charge sheet, without conducting enquiry, without paying compensation and without
following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, to
what relief, compensation & other service benefits the above aggrieved workman is entitled
to?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 22nd November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Partap Singh S/O Sh. Jai Singh, R/O Village-
Bhadoo, P.O. Gharwasra, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer,
HPPWD( B & R) Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
5384
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 31 tuojh] 2012@11 ek?k] 1933
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Partap Singh S/O Sh. Jai Singh, R/O Village-
Bhadoo, P.O. Gharwasra, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, by the Executive Engineer,
HPPWD Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005,
without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified?
If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 14th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/08/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exist between Sh. Rajesh Kumar S/O Sh. Thakur Singh, Village-
Khalanu, P.O. Panjalag, Tehsil Ladbhrol, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/s The Additional Superintending
Engineer, HPSEB Electrical Division Joginder Nagar, Distt. Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services/ giving breaks in service of Sh. Rajesh Kumar S/O Sh.
Thakur Singh, Village- Khalanu, P.O. Panjalag, Tehsil Ladbhrol, Distt. Mandi, (H.P.) by
The Additional Superintending Engineer, HPSEB Electrical Division Joginder Nagar, Distt.
Mandi, H.P. from time to time, w.e.f. 21.9.1999 to 20.7.2000 and finally w.e.f. 21.10.2000,
without compliance of provisions contained in Section 25-F, G & H of the ibid Act, as
abandonment of services has not been established, is legal & justified, if not , what amount
of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above workman is
entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5385
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 31 tuojh] 2012@11 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001 24th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Ram Sai S/O Sh. Kangnu Ram, Village-
Langehar, P.O. Giyun, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD(
B & R) Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Ram Sai S/O Sh. Kangnu Ram, Village-Langehar,
P.O. Giyun, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division
Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005, without following the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above Ex-Worker is
entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 24th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes
about the following issue exist between Sh. Manoj Kumar S/O Sh. Mahant Ram, R/O Village
Jahanjahal, P.O. Ropadi, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer,
HPPWD( B & R) Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
5386
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 31 tuojh] 2012@11 ek?k] 1933
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Manoj Kumar S/O Sh. Mahant Ram, R/O Village
Jahanjahal, P.O. Ropadi, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, by the Executive Engineer,
HPPWD Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005,
without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified?
If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 24th November, 2011
No. 11-6/85(Lab) ID/Shimla/2011.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. R.L. Dogra, General Secretary, Himachal
Transport Workers Union, Fay Lodge, Cart Road, Bus Stand, Shimla-I on behalf of Sh. Rishi Raj,
(Worker) S/O Late Sh. Ram Lal Gupta, R/O Village- Mohari, P.O. Shoghi, Tehsil & District
Shimla, H.P. V/s The Managing Director, HRTC Shimla.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under
Section-7 of Act ibid, onthe following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether demand of Sh. R.L. Dogra, General Secretary, Himachal Transport Workers
Union, Fay Lodge, Cart Road, Bus Stand, Shimla-I vide demand notice dated-25.5.2010
before The Managing Director, Himachal Road Transport Corporation for encashment of
Compensatory Leave to Sh. Rishi Raj, (Retired Conductor) S/O Late Sh. Ram Lal Gupta,
R/O Village- Mohari, P.O. Shoghi, Tehsil & District Shimla, H.P., as such encashment was
also allowed to Sh. Sant Ram, Retired Conductor, who was similarly situated as Sh. Rishi
Raj, is legal and justified? If yes, to what relief and compensation Sh. Rishi Raj, (Retired
Conductor) S/O Late Sh. Ram Lal Gupta is entitled to from the concerned employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5387
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 31 tuojh] 2012@11 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 8th Nov., 2011
No. 11-2/93(Lab)ID/10/Solan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exist between Sh. Satinder S/O Sh. Leela Ram, R/O Village Bathival,
P.O. Dilman, Distt. Sirmour, (H.P.) V/s i) Hony. Advisor, M/s Sanitation Promotion &
Development Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector-6, Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii)
The Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P.
(Principal Employer).
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under
Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Satinder S/O Sh. Leela Ram, R/O Village
Bathival, P.O. Dilman, Distt. Sirmour, (H.P.) w.e.f. 26.10.2009 by i) Hony. Advisor, M/s
Sanitation Promotion & Development Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector-6, Dwarka, New Delhi
(Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture &
Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer), however no Registration
Certificate and License was respectively obtained by the Principal Employer & Contractor
as provided in The Contract Labour ( R & A) Act, 1970 and not giving her an opportunity
of consideration for re-employment by the employers from the dates her juniors were
allegedly employed, thus in violation of provisions of Section 25-F, 25-G & H of the ibid
Act and further demand to declare her direct employee of the Principal Employer, is legal
and justified, if not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits,
compensation and relief the above worker is entitled to from the above
Employers/Management?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
__________
DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001 23rd November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exist between Smt. Savitri Devi W/O Sh. Sher Singh, Village &
P.O. Tanehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R)
Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.
5388
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 31 tuojh] 2012@11 ek?k] 1933
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Savitri Devi W/O Sh. Sher Singh, Village &
P.O. Tanehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division
Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005, without following the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above Ex-Worker is
entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 23rd November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Jai Singh S/o Sh. Dumnu Ram Village-
Langehar, P.O. Giyun, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD(
B & R) Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Jai Singh S/o Sh. Dumnu Ram Village-Langehar,
P.O. Giyun, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division
Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005, without following the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above Ex-Worker is
entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5389
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 31 tuojh] 2012@11 ek?k] 1933
DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 23rd November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Basant Singh S/O Sh. Dumnu Ram, Village-
Langehar, P.O. Giyun, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD(
B & R) Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Basant Singh S/O Sh. Dumnu Ram, Village-
Langehar, P.O. Giyun, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD
Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005, without
following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not,
what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above
Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
__________
DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 16th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/Mandi/2011.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Shyam Singh S/O Sh. Swaru Ram R/O Village
Dadoun, P.O. Cheuni, Tehsil Thunag, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/s The Sr. Executive Engineer, HPSEB
(Elect.) Division Gohar, Distt. Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
5390
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 31 tuojh] 2012@11 ek?k] 1933
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Shyam Singh S/O Sh. Swaru Ram R/O Village
Dadoun, P.O. Cheuni, Tehsil Thunag, Distt. Mandi, H.P. by The Sr. Executive Engineer,
HPSEB (Elect.) Division Gohar, Distt. Mandi, (H.P.) w.e.f. 16.3.2000 without issuing
charge sheet, without conducting enquiry and without complying with the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits, the above workers are entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
___________
DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about
the following issue exist between Sh. Yash Pal S/O Sh. Prakash Chand, Village- Tayar, P.O.
Khukhai, Tehsil Bangana, Distt. Una, H.P. V/s M/s C & C Construction Company Ltd. VPO
Samoor Kalan, Distt. Una, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Yash Pal S/O Sh. Prakash Chand, Supervisor,
R/O Village- Tayar, P.O. Khukhai, Tehsil Bangana, Distt. Una, (H.P.) by the management
of M/s C & C Construction Company Ltd. VPO Samoor Kalan, Distt. Una, H.P. without
issuing any charge sheet, without conducting enquiry and without following the provisions
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is proper and justified? If not, to what back wages,
service benefits and relief the above named workman is entitled to?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5391
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 31 tuojh] 2012@11 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 08 December, 2011
No. 11-1/95(Lab)ID/11/Rampur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exist between Sh. Amrit Singh S/O Sh. Vijay Singh, Village Barada,
P.O.- Arahal, Tehsil Rohru, Distt. Shimla, H.P. V/s The Executive Engineer, HPSEB Division
Rohru, Distt. Shimla, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under
Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“ Whether termination of the services of Sh. Sh. Amrit Singh S/O Sh. Vijay Singh, Village
Barada, P.O.- Arahal, Tehsil Rohru, Distt. Shimla, w.e.f. February/March, 1998 by the
TheExecutive Engineer, HPSEB Division Rohru, Distt. Shimla, H.P. without complying
withthe provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what
reliefof service benefits including reinstatement, seniority and back wages the above
workman is entitled to?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 14th December, 2011
No. 11-2/93(Lab) ID/ Solan/2010.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exist between The President and General Secretary, Base Corporation
Workers & Employees Union, Village Nagali, P.O. Ochghat, Tehsil & District Solan-Affiliated to
AITUC & C/O AITUC Office, Saproon, Solan, H.P. -173211 V/s The Factory Manager, Base
Corporation Ltd. Village- Nagali, P.O. Ochghat, Tehsil & District Solan, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
5392
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 31 tuojh] 2012@11 ek?k] 1933
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under
Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
1.
“Whether miscellaneous demands put forth vide demand notice dated-26.8.2009
(Copy-enclosed) except at Sr. No. 09 & 13 by The President and General Secretary,
Base Corporation Workers and Employees Union, Village- Nagali, PO Ochghat,
Tehsil & Distt. Solan- Affiliated to AITUC C/O AITUC Office, Saproon,
Solan,H.P.-173211, to be fulfilled by the Occupier / Factory Manager /
Management, Base Corporation Ltd. Village-Nagali, PO- Ochghat, Tehsil & Distt.
Solan, H.P. are maintainable, legal and justified, If yes, what monetary and other
service benefits and compensation the workers are entitled to?”
2.
Whether action of the Management (Occupier/Factory Manager), M/s Base
Corporation Ltd. Village- Nagali, PO- Ochghat, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H.P. to
terminate the services of its worker Sh. Babloo & 9 other workers w.e.f. 24.12.2009,
Sh. Sanjeev Sharma & 11 others w.e.f. 25.12.2009(as per Annexure-A) and Sh.
Ranjeet Kumar & 14 other workers w.e.f. 26.12.2009 (as per Annexure-B) without
serving any charge sheet, without holding any enquiry and without applying for
permission to the Conciliation Officer, during the pendency of conciliation
proceedings before the Labour Officercum-Conciliation Officer, Solan Zone, Solan
as provided in Section 33(1), are maintainable, legal and justified? If not, what relief
of service benefits including reinstatement, seniority and compensation the
aggrieved workers are entitled to from above employer/management?”
3.
“Whether the strike resorted to by the 45 workmen (whose names are given therein
the Annexure A, B & C w.e.f. 15.12.2009 onwards as alleged by the management of
Base Corporation Ltd. Village- Nagali, PO- Ochghat, Tehsil & Distt. Solan is legal
and justified? If yes, to what wages & relief the workmen in strike are entitled to ? If
not, what its legal effects upon the workmen on strike.”
4.
“ Whether the lock out declared w.e.f. 15.12.2009 onwards in the factory for 45
workmen by the Management of M/s Base Corporation Ltd. Village-Nagali, PO-
Ochghat, Tehsil & Distt. Solan as alleged by the Union Representatives of Base
Corporation Workers & Employees Union, Saproon, Solan, is legal and justified? If
not, to what wages & relief the effected workmen due to continuing lockout are
entitled to? If yes, what its legal effect upon the management who declared lockout.”
5.
“ Whether the suspension from service w.e.f. 16.12.2009 of 8 workmen S/Sh. Amar
Singh, Surinder Suri, Amit, Tilak Raj, Suresh Kumar, Inder Sharma, Bhagat Ram &
Ratti Ram due to infighting between the workmen as on 14.12.2009, by the
management of M/s Base Corporation Ltd. Village-Nagali, PO- Ochghat, Tehsil &
Distt. Solan & that too during the pendency of conciliation proceedings, is legal and
justified? If not, to what service benefits & relief the above named suspended
workmen are entitled to?”
Sd/-
Labour Commissioner.
5393
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 31 tuojh] 2012@11 ek?k] 1933
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 08 December, 2011
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes
about the following issue exist between Sh. Inder Singh S/O Sh. Balak Ram, R/O Village Drubal,
P.O. Kot, Sub Tehsil Kotli, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPSEB Electrical
Division Mandi, Distt. Mandi, H.P.
As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Inder Singh S/O Sh. Balak Ram R/O Village
Drubal, P.O. Kot, Sub Tehsil Kotli, Distt. Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, HPSEB
Electrical Division Mandi, District Mandi, (H.P.) during April, 2000 without complying
with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what
amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits, the above worker is entitled to from
the above employer?”
____________
flapkbZ ,oa tu LokLF; foHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f”keyk&171002] 30 tuojh] 2012
la[;k% vkbZ0ih0,p0&ch¼,p½ 8&52@2011&dkaxMk+-&;r% jkT;iky fgekpy izns”k dks ;g izrhr
gksrk gS fd fgekpy izns”k ljdkj }kjk ljdkjh O;; ij lkoZtfud iz;kstu gsrq uker% xkao xaxFk rglhy
uwjiqj] ftyk dkaxMk+ esa mBkÅ flapkbZ ;kstuk egky xaxFk ds fuekZ.k gsrq Hkwfe vftZr djuh visf{kr gS]
vr,o ,rn~}kjk ;g vf/klwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd mDr ifj{ks= esasa tSlk fd fuEu fooj.kh esa fufnZ’V fd;k
x;k gS mijksDr iz;kstu ds fy, Hkwfe dk vtZu visf{kr gS A
2-
;g vf/klwpuk ,sls lHkh O;fDr;ksa dks tks bl ls lEcfU/kr gSa] ;k gks ldrs gSa] dh
tkudkjh ds fy, Hkwfe vtZu vf/kfu;e] 1894 dh /kkjk&4 ds micU/kkas ds vUrxZr tkjh dh tkrh gS A
5394
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 31 tuojh] 2012@11 ek?k] 1933
3-
iwoksZDr /kkjk }kjk iznRr “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, jkT;iky] fgekpy izns”k bl le;
bl midze esa dk;Zjr lHkh vf/kdkfj;ksa muds deZpkfj;ksa vkSj Jfedksa dks bykds dh fdlh Hkh Hkwfe esa izos”k
djus rFkk losZ{k.k djus vkSj ml /kkjk }kjk visf{kr vFkok vuqer% lHkh vU; dk;kZsa dks djus ds fy,
lg’kZ izkf/kdkj nsrs gSaA
4-
dksbZ Hkh fgrc) O;fDr ftls mDr ifj{ks= esa dfFkr Hkwfe ds vtZu ij dksbZ vkifRr gks rks
og bl vf/klwpuk ds izdkf”kr gksus ds rhl fnuksa dh vof/k ds Hkhrj fyf[kr :i esa Hkw&vtZu lekgrkZ]
dkaxMk+ fgekpy izns”k yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx ds le{k viuh vkifRr nk;j dj ldrk gS A
foLr`r fooj.kh
ftyk
rglhy
xkao
[kljk ua0
{ks= ¼gSDVs;jksa esa½
dkaxMk+
uwjiqj
xaxFk
1625
0-01-40
1626
0-03-15
1627
0-00-49
fdrk-3
0-05-04
vkns”k }kjk]
gLrk{kfjr@&
iz/kku lfpo ¼flapkbZ ,oa tu LokLF;½A
&&&&&&&
flapkbZ ,oa tu LokLF; foHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f”keyk&171002] 30 tuojh] 2012
la[;k% vkbZ0ih0,p0&ch¼,p½ 8&53@2011&dkaxMk+-&;r% jkT;iky fgekpy izns”k dks ;g izrhr
gksrk gS fd fgekpy izns”k ljdkj }kjk ljdkjh O;; ij lkoZtfud iz;kstu gsrq uker% egky o ekStk
cMq[kj] rglhy bUnkSjk] ftyk dkaxMk+ esa uydwi uEcj&78 ds fuekZ.k gsrq Hkwfe vftZr djuh visf{kr gS]
vr,o ,rn~}kjk ;g vf/klwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd mDr ifj{ks= esasa tSlk fd fuEu fooj.kh esa fufnZ’V fd;k
x;k gS mijksDr iz;kstu ds fy, Hkwfe dk vtZu visf{kr gS A
2-
;g vf/klwpuk ,sls lHkh O;fDr;ksa dks tks bl ls lEcfU/kr gSa] ;k gks ldrs gSa] dh
tkudkjh ds fy, Hkwfe vtZu vf/kfu;e] 1894 dh /kkjk&4 ds micU/kkas ds vUrxZr tkjh dh tkrh gS A
3-
iwoksZDr /kkjk }kjk iznRr “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, jkT;iky] fgekpy izns”k bl le;
bl midze esa dk;Zjr lHkh vf/kdkfj;ksa muds deZpkfj;ksa vkSj Jfedksa dks bykds dh fdlh Hkh Hkwfe esa izos”k
djus rFkk losZ{k.k djus vkSj ml /kkjk }kjk visf{kr vFkok vuqer% lHkh vU; dk;kZsa dks djus ds fy,
lg’kZ izkf/kdkj nsrs gSaA
4-
dksbZ Hkh fgrc) O;fDr ftls mDr ifj{ks= esa dfFkr Hkwfe ds vtZu ij dksbZ vkifRr gks rks
og bl vf/klwpuk ds izdkf”kr gksus ds rhl fnuksa dh vof/k ds Hkhrj fyf[kr :i esa Hkw&vtZu lekgrkZ]
dkaxMk+ fgekpy izns”k yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx ds le{k viuh vkifRr nk;j dj ldrk gS A
5395
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 31 tuojh] 2012@11 ek?k] 1933
foLr`r fooj.kh
ftyk
rglhy
xkao
[kljk ua0
{ks= ¼gSDVs;jksa esa½
dkaxMk+
bUnkSjk
cMq[kj
1918
0-01-99
919
0-01-47
fdrk-2
0-03-46
vkns”k }kjk]
gLrk{kfjr@&
iz/kku lfpo ¼flapkbZ ,oa tu LokLF;½A
&&&&&&&
flapkbZ ,oa tu LokLF; foHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f”keyk&171002] 30 tuojh] 2012
la[;k% vkbZ0ih0,p0&ch¼,p½ 8&54@2011&dkaxMk+-&;r% jkT;iky fgekpy izns”k dks ;g izrhr
gksrk gS fd fgekpy izns”k ljdkj }kjk ljdkjh O;; ij lkoZtfud iz;kstu gsrq uker% xkao <u] Tokyh
rglhy Tokyh] ftyk dkaxMk+ esa T/Well Pharian Village Jawali N.C. Hamlets Harjan Abadi ds
fuekZ.k gsrq Hkwfe vftZr djuh visf{kr gS] vr,o ,rn~}kjk ;g vf/klwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd mDr ifj{ks=
esasa tSlk fd fuEu fooj.kh esa fufnZ’V fd;k x;k gS mijksDr iz;kstu ds fy, Hkwfe dk vtZu visf{kr gS A
2-
;g vf/klwpuk ,sls lHkh O;fDr;ksa dks tks bl ls lEcfU/kr gSa] ;k gks ldrs gSa] dh
tkudkjh ds fy, Hkwfe vtZu vf/kfu;e] 1894 dh /kkjk&4 ds micU/kkas ds vUrxZr tkjh dh tkrh gS A
3-
iwoksZDr /kkjk }kjk iznRr “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, jkT;iky] fgekpy izns”k bl le;
bl midze esa dk;Zjr lHkh vf/kdkfj;ksa muds deZpkfj;ksa vkSj Jfedksa dks bykds dh fdlh Hkh Hkwfe esa izos”k
djus rFkk losZ{k.k djus vkSj ml /kkjk }kjk visf{kr vFkok vuqer% lHkh vU; dk;kZsa dks djus ds fy,
lg’kZ izkf/kdkj nsrs gSaA
4-
dksbZ Hkh fgrc) O;fDr ftls mDr ifj{ks= esa dfFkr Hkwfe ds vtZu ij dksbZ vkifRr gks rks
og bl vf/klwpuk ds izdkf”kr gksus ds rhl fnuksa dh vof/k ds Hkhrj fyf[kr :i esa Hkw&vtZu lekgrkZ]
dkaxMk+ fgekpy izns”k yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx ds le{k viuh vkifRr nk;j dj ldrk gS A
foLr`r fooj.kh
ftyk
rglhy
xkao
[kljk ua0
{ks= ¼gSDVs;jksa esa½
dkaxMk+
Tokyh
<u
1407/1
0-00-46
vkns”k }kjk]
gLrk{kfjr@&
iz/kku lfpo ¼flapkbZ ,oa tu LokLF;½A
5396
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 31 tuojh] 2012@11 ek?k] 1933
flapkbZ ,oa tu LokLF; foHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f”keyk&171002] 30 tuojh] 2012
la[;k% vkbZ0ih0,p0&ch¼,p½ 8&55@2011&dkaxMk+-&;r% jkT;iky fgekpy izns”k dks ;g izrhr
gksrk gS fd fgekpy izns”k ljdkj }kjk ljdkjh O;; ij lkoZtfud iz;kstu gsrq uker% xkao erykgM+]
rglhy Tokyh] ftyk dkaxMk+ esa uydwi erykgM+ W.S.S. ds fuekZ.k gsrq Hkwfe vftZr djuh visf{kr gS]
vr,o ,rn~}kjk ;g vf/klwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd mDr ifj{ks= esasa tSlk fd fuEu fooj.kh esa fufnZ’V fd;k
x;k gS mijksDr iz;kstu ds fy, Hkwfe dk vtZu visf{kr gS A
2-
;g vf/klwpuk ,sls lHkh O;fDr;ksa dks tks bl ls lEcfU/kr gSa] ;k gks ldrs gSa] dh
tkudkjh ds fy, Hkwfe vtZu vf/kfu;e] 1894 dh /kkjk&4 ds micU/kkas ds vUrxZr tkjh dh tkrh gS A
3-
iwoksZDr /kkjk }kjk iznRr “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, jkT;iky] fgekpy izns”k bl le;
bl midze esa dk;Zjr lHkh vf/kdkfj;ksa muds deZpkfj;ksa vkSj Jfedksa dks bykds dh fdlh Hkh Hkwfe esa izos”k
djus rFkk losZ{k.k djus vkSj ml /kkjk }kjk visf{kr vFkok vuqer% lHkh vU; dk;kZsa dks djus ds fy,
lg’kZ izkf/kdkj nsrs gSaA
4-
dksbZ Hkh fgrc) O;fDr ftls mDr ifj{ks= esa dfFkr Hkwfe ds vtZu ij dksbZ vkifRr gks rks
og bl vf/klwpuk ds izdkf”kr gksus ds rhl fnuksa dh vof/k ds Hkhrj fyf[kr :i esa Hkw&vtZu lekgrkZ]
dkaxMk+ fgekpy izns”k yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx ds le{k viuh vkifRr nk;j dj ldrk gS A
foLr`r fooj.kh
ftyk
rglhy
xkao
[kljk ua0
{ks= ¼gSDVs;jksa esa½
dkaxMk+
Tokyh
erykgM+
1004/432/1
0-03-50
vkns”k }kjk]
gLrk{kfjr@&
iz/kku lfpo ¼flapkbZ ,oa tu LokLF;½A
fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr