jkti=] fgekpy izns'k
fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr
f”keyk] ohjokj] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
fgekpy izns'k ljdkj
vkcdkjh ,oa djk/kku foHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f'keyk&171002] 26 ekpZ] 2013
la[;k bZ0,Dl0,u0&,Q¼10½&7@2011.—fgekpy izns'k dh jkT;iky] fgekpy izns'k ewY;
ifjof/kZr dj fu;e] 2005 ds fu;e 40d vkSj lSUVªy lsYt VSDl ¼fgekpy izns”k½ :Yt] 1970 ds :y
7¼1&A½ ds v/khu muesa fufgr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, vf/klwfpr djrh gaS fd O;kSgkfj;ksa ds
fuEufyf[kr oxZ] foojf.k;ksa dks vfuok;Zr% bu fu;eksa ds micU/kksa ds vuqlkj izFke vizSy] 2013 ls
vkcdkjh ,oa djk/kku foHkkx dh oSclkbZV ij leLr visf{kr lwpuk,a bySDVªkWfuDyh viyksM djds nkf[ky
djsaxs % &
ß;FkkfLFkfr] fgekpy izns”k ewY; ifjof/kZr dj vf/kfu;e] 2005 ;k dsUnzh; foØ; dj
vf/kfu;e] 1956 ds v/khu jftLVªhd`r leLr O;kSgkjh ftudk okf’kZd vkorZ 40 yk[k #i, ;k
blls vf/kd gSAÞ
vkns'k }kjk]
gLrk{kfjr@&
iz/kku lfpo ¼vkcdkjh ,oa djk/kku½A
266&jkti=@2013&28&3&2013 ¼7561½
7562
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
[Authoritative English text of this Department notification No. EXN-F(10)-7/2011, dated
26-03-2013 as required under clause (3) of Article 348 of the Constitution of India.]
EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171002, the 26th March, 2013
No. EXN-F(10)-7/2011.—In exercise of the powers vested in her under under Rule 40A of
the Himachal Pradesh Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 and Rule 7(1-A) of the Central Sales Tax
(Himachal Pradesh) Rules, 1970, the Governor of Himachal Pradesh, is pleased to notify that the
following Class of dealers shall compulsorily file the returns electronically by way of uploading all
the requisite information on the website of Excise and Taxation Department with effect from 1st
April, 2013 in accordance with the provisions of the respective Rules :—
“All dealers registered under the Himachal Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 or the
Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, as the case may be, having annual turnover of r40 lakhs
and above”.
By order,
Sd/-
Principal Secretary (E&T).
_________
yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f”keyk&2] 24 ekpZ] 2013
la0 ih0ch0MCY;w0 ¼ch0½,Q0¼5½ 100@2010&I.—;r% fgekpy izns”k ds jkT;iky dks ;g izrhr
gksrk gS fd fgekpy izns”k ljdkj dks ljdkjh O;; ij lkoZtfud iz;kstu gsrq uker% mi egky [kaokxh]
rglhy dYik] ftyk fdUukSj esa lhek lMd laxBu dSEi iaokjh ds fuekZ.k gsrq Hkwfe vftZr djuh visf{kr
gS] vr,o ,rn~}kjk ;g vf/klwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd mDr ifj{ks= esa tSlk fd fuEu fooj.kh esa fufnZ’V
fd;k x;k gS] mijksDr iz;kstu ds fy, Hkwfe dk vtZu visf{kr gSA
2- ;g vf/klwpuk ,sls lHkh O;fDr;ksa dks] tks blls lEcfU/kr gks ldrs gaS] dh tkudkjh ds fy,
Hkw&vtZu vf/kfu;e] 1894 dh /kkjk&4 ds micU/kksa ds vUrxZr tkjh dh tkrh gSA
3- iwoksZDr /kkjk }kjk iznRr “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, jkT;iky] fgekpy izns”k bl le; bl
miØe esa dk;Zjr lHkh vf/kdkfj;ksa muds deZpkfj;ksa vkSj Jfedksa dks bykds dh fdlh Hkh Hkwfe esa izos”k
djus vkSj losZ{k.k djus rFkk ml /kkjk }kjk visf{kr vFkok vuqer% vU; lHkh dk;ksZa dks djus ds fy,
lg’kZ izkf/kdkj nsrs gSaA
4- Hkwfe dk js[kkad dk fujh{k.k dk;kZy; Hkw&vtZu lekgrkZ] fgekpy izns”k] yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx
¼nf{k.k {ks=½] foUVj fQYM] f”keyk&3 esa fd;k tk ldrk gSA
7563
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
fooj.kh
ftyk
rglhy
xkao
[kljk ua0
jdok ¼gS0 eas½
fdUukSj
dYik
[kokaxh
758
0&08&37
512
0&05&28
fdÙkk % 2 0&13&65
vkns”k }kjk]
gLrk{kfjr@&
iz/kku lfpo ¼yksd fuekZ.k½A
&&&&&&&
yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f”keyk&2] 24 ekpZ] 2013
la0 ih0ch0MCY;w0 ¼ch0½,Q¼5½ 14@2012-—;r% fgekpy izns”k ds jkT;iky dks ;g izrhr gksrk gS
fd fgekpy izns”k ljdkj dks ljdkjh O;; ij lkoZtfud iz;kstu gsrq uker% xkao eqckfjdiqj] rglhy
vEc] ftyk Åuk esa tkyU/kj&gksf”k;kjiqj&xxjsV&eqckfjdiqj&vEc&uknkSu&gehjiqj&vokgnsoh&Vks.khnsoh&
/keZiqj&e.Mh mPp ekxZ 70 dks pkSM+k djus gsrq Hkwfe vftZr djuh visf{kr gS] vr%,o ,rn~}kjk ;g
vf/klwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd mDr ifj{ks= esa tSlk fd fuEu fooj.kh esa fufnZ’V fd;k x;k gS] mijksDr
iz;kstu ds fy, Hkwfe dk vtZu visf{kr gSA
2- ;g vf/klwpuk ,sls lHkh O;fDr;ksa dks] tks blls lEcfU/kr gks ldrs gSa] dh tkudkjh ds fy,
Hkwfe&vtZu vf/kfu;e] 1894 dh /kkjk&4 ds micU/kksa ds vUrxZr tkjh dh tkrh gSA
3- iwoksZDr /kkjk }kjk iznRr “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, jkT;iky fgekpy izns”k bl le; bl
miØe esa dk;Zjr lHkh vf/kdkfj;ksa muds deZpkfj;ksa vkSj Jfedksa dks bykds dh fdlh Hkh Hkwfe esa izos”k
djus vkSj losZ{k.k djus rFkk mi /kkjk }kjk visf{kr vFkok vuqer% vU; lHkh dk;ksZa dks djus ds fy, lg’kZ
izkf/kdkj nsrs gSaA
4- dksbZ Hkh fgrc) O;fDr ftls mDr ifj{ks= esa dfFkr Hkwfe ds vtZu ij dksbZ vkifr gks rks og
bl vf/klwPkuk ds izdkf”kr gksus ds rhl fnu dh vof/k ds Hkhrj fyf[kr :i esa Hkw&vtZu lekgrkZ] yksd
fuekZ.k foHkkx] e.Mh] ¼fg0 iz0½ ds le{k viuh vkifÙk nk;j dj ldrk gSA
fooj.kh
ftyk rglhy xkoa
[kljk ua0
jdok ¼gS0 eas½
Åuk vEc
eqckfjdiqj
1242@1
00&07&11
fdÙkk % 1
00&07&11
vkns”k }kjk]
gLrk{kfjr@&
iz/kku lfpo ¼yksd fuekZ.k½A
7564
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f”keyk&2] 26 ekpZ] 2013
la0 ih0ch0MCY;w0 ¼ch0½,Q¼5½ 3@2012.—;r% fgekpy izns”k ds jkT;iky dks ;g izrhr gksrk gS
fd fgekpy izns”k ljdkj dks ljdkjh O;; ij lkoZtfud iz;kstu gsrq xkoa iykgVk] rglhy vdhZ] ftyk
lkys u esa “kkyk?kkV&lw;kZ lM+d ds fuekZ.k gsrq Hkwfe vftZr djuh visf{kr gS] vr%,o ,rn~}kjk ;g ?kksf’kr
fd;k tkrk gS fd fuEufyf[kr fooj.kh esa of.kZr Hkwfe mi;qZDr iz;kstu ds fy, visf{kr gSA
2-
;g ?kks’k.kk] Hkwfe vtZu vf/kfu;e] 1894 dh /kkjk&6 ds micU/kksa ds v/khu blls
lEcfU/kr lHkh O;fDr;ksa dks lwpuk gsrq dh tkrh gS rFkk mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&7 ds v/khu Hkw&vtZu
lekgrkZ yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx foUVj fQYM] f”keyk dks mDr Hkwfe ds vtZu djus ds vkns”k ysus dk
,rn~}kjk funs”k fn;k tkrk gSA
3-
Hkwfe js[kkad dk fujh{k.k Hkw&vtZu lekgrkZ] yksd fuekZ.k foHkkx foUVj fQYM] f”keyk ds
dk;kZy; esa fd;k tk ldrk gSA
fooj.kh
ftyk
rglhy
xkoa
[kljk ua0
jdok ¼gS0 eas½
lk0
gky
lksyu vdhZ
iykgVk
4 feu
9
0&1&18
fdÙkk % 1 0&1&18
vkns”k }kjk]
gLrk{kfjr@&
iz/kku lfpo ¼yksd fuekZ.k½A
&&&&&&&&
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 25th March, 2013
No. HHC/Admn. 3 (221)/86-I.—12 days earned leave on and w.e.f 1.04.2013 to 2.04.2013
with permission to prefix Sunday falling 31.03.2013 and suffix Second Saturday, Sunday and
Gezetted holidays falling on 13.04.2013 to 15.04.2013 is hereby sanctioned in favour of Shri
Ravinder Sharma, Court master of this Registry.
Certified that Shri Ravinder Sharma is likely to join the same post and at the same station
from where he proceeds on leave after the expiry of the above leave period.
Certified that Shri Ravinder Sharma would have continued to officiate the same post of
Court master, but for his proceeding on leave.
By order,
Sd/-
Registrar General.
7565
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
vk;qosZn foHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f'keyk&2] 23 EkkpZ]2013
la[;k vk;q0&,&¼3½&9@2010-&&fgekpy izns'k dh jkT;iky] Hkkjr ds lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 309
ds ijUrqd }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] fgekpy izns'k yksd lsok vk;ksx ds ijke'kZ ls]
fgekpy izns'k vk;qosZn foHkkx esa ofj’B vk;qosZfnd fpfdRld¼fo”ks’kK½] oxZ&I ¼jktif=r½ ds in ds fy,
bl vf/klwpuk ls lyaXu mikcU/k& “d” ds vuqlkj] HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;e] cukrh gSa] vFkkZr~%&
1- laf{kIr uke vkSj izkjEHk-&&¼1½ bu fu;eksa dk laf{kIr uke fgekpy izns'k vk;qosZn foHkkx]
ofj’B vk;qosZfnd fpfdRld¼fo”ks’kK½] oxZ&I ¼jktif=r½ HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;e] 2013 gSA
¼2½ ;s fu;e jkti=] fgekpy izns”k esa izdkf”kr fd, tkus dh rkjh[k ls izo`Rr gksaxsA
2- fujlu vkSj O;ko`fRr;ka-&&¼1½ bl foHkkx dh vf/klwpuk la[;k% LokLF;&, ¼3½&5@87 rkjh[k
16&2&1989 }kjk vf/klwfpr fgekpy izns”k Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk i)fr vkSj gksE;ksiSFkh foHkkx oxZ&2 lsok
T;s’B vk;qosZfnd fpfdRld in] ¼jktif=r½ HkrhZ ,oa izksUufr fu;e] 1989 dk ,rn~}kjk fujlu fd;k tkrk
gSA
¼2½ ,sls fujlu ds gksrs gq, Hkh mi;qZDr mi&fu;e 2¼1½ ds v/khu bl izdkj fujflr fu;eksa ds
v/khu dh xbZ dksbZ fu;qfDr] ckr ;k dkjZokbZ bu fu;eksa ds v/khu fof/kekU; :i esa dh xbZ le>h tk,xhA
vkns'k }kjk]
gLrk{kfjr@&
iz/kku lfpo ¼vk;qosZn½A
&&&&&&&
mikcU/k& ^^d**
fgekpy izns”k vk;qosZn foHkkx esa ofj’B vk;qosZfnd fpfdRld ¼fo”ks’kK½] oxZ&I ¼jktif=r½ ds in ds fy,
HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;e
1- in dk uke-&&Okfj’B vk;qosZfnd fpfdRld ¼fo”ks’kK½
2- inksa dh l[a;k-&&18 ¼vBkjg½
3- oxkhZdj.k-&&oxZ&I ¼jktif=r½
4- Oksrueku-&&(i) fu;fer in/kkfj;ksa ds fy, osrueku-&&15600&39100@&#i, tek 6600@&
#Ik, xzsM isA
(ii) lafonk ij fu;qDr deZpkfj;ksa ds fy, miyfC/k;ka-&&LrEHk 15&d esa fn, x, C;kSjs ds vuqlkj
22]200@& #Ik,A
5- p;u in vFkok vp;u in-&&p;uA
7566
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
6- lh/kh HkrhZ ds fy, vk;q-&&45 o"kZ vkSj blls de
ijUrq lh/ks HkrhZ fd, tkus okys O;fDr;ksa ds fy, Åijh vk;q lhek] rnFkZ ;k lafonk ds vk/kkj ij
fu;qDr fd, x, O;fDr;ksa lfgr] igys ls gh ljdkj dh lsok esa jr vH;fFkZ;ksa dks ykxw ugha gksxh %
ijUrq ;g vkSj fd ;fn rnFkZ ;k lafonk ds vk/kkj ij fu;qDr fd;k x;k vH;FkhZ bl :i esa
fu;qfDr dh rkjh[k dks vf/kd vk;q dk gks x;k gks rks] og rnFkZ ;k lafonk ds vk/kkj ij fu;qfDr ds
dkj.k fofgr vk;q esa NwV ds fy, ik= ugha gksxk %
ijUrq ;g vkSj fd vuqlwfpr tkfr;ksa@vuqlwfpr tutkfr;ksa rFkk vU; oxkZsa ds O;fDr;ksa ds fy,
Åijh vk;q lhek esa mruh gh NwV nh tk ldsxh] ftruh fgekpy izns”k ljdkj ds lk/kkj.k ;k fo”ks’k
vkns”k ds v/khu vuqKs; gS %
ijUrq ;g vkSj Hkh fd ifCyd lsDVj] fuxeksa rFkk Lok;Ÿk fudk;ksa ds lHkh deZpkfj;ksa dks] tks ,sls
ifCyd lsDVj] fuxeksa rFkk Lok;Ÿk fudk;ksa ds izkjfEHkd xBu ds le; ,sls ifCyd lsDVj] fuxeksa rFkk
Lok;Ÿk fudk;ksa esa vkesyu ls iwoZ ljdkjh deZpkjh Fks] lh/kh HkrhZ esa vk;q lhek esa ,slh gh fj;k;r nh
tk,xh] tSlh ljdkjh deZpkfj;ksa dks vuqKs; gS] fdUrq bl izdkj dh fj;k;r ifCyd lsDVj] fuxeksa rFkk
Lok;Ùk fudk;ksa ds ,sls deZpkfjoa`n dks ugha nh tk,xh] tks Ik”pkr~orhZ ,sls fuxeksa@Lok;r fudk;ksa }kjk
fu;qDr fd, x, Fks@ fd, x, gSa vkSj mu ifCyd lsDVj] fuxeksa@Lok;Ùk fudk;ksa ds izkjfEHkd xBu ds
Ik”pkr~ ,sls fuxeksa@Lok;Ÿk fudk;ksa dh lsok esa vfUre :Ik ls vkesfyr fd, Xk, gSa@fd, Xk, FksA
¼1½ lh/kh HkrhZ ds fy, vk;q lhek dh x.kuk ml o"kZ ds izFke fnol ls dh tk,xh] ftlesa in
¼inksa½ dks vkosnu vkefU=r djus ds fy,] ;FkkfLFkfr] foKkfir fd;k x;k gS ;k fu;kstuky;ksa dks
vf/klwfpr fd;k x;k Gsa
¼2½ vU;Fkk lqvfgZr vH;fFkZ;ksa dh n”kk esa lh/kh HkrhZ ds fy, vk;q lhek vkSj vuqHko fgekpy
izns”k yksd lsok vk;ksx ds foosdkuqlkj f”kfFky fd;k tk ldsxkA
7- lh/ks HkrhZ fd, tkus okys O;fDr;ksa ds fy, visf{kr U;wure “kSf{kd vkSj vU; vgZrk,a-&&
¼d½ vfuok;Z vgZrk-&&¼i½ Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk dsUnzh; ifj’kn@fgekpy izns”k ljdkj }kjk ekU;rk izkIr
fdlh laLFkku ls de ls de rhu o’kZ dh vof/k dh dk;k fpfdRlk ;k ckyjksx ;k izlwfrra= ;k “kY;ra=
;k “kkYkd; ra= ;k iapdekZ esa ,e0Mh0¼vk;qosZn½A
(ii) lEcaf/kr fo”ks’kKrk esa LukrdksŸkj djus ds Ik”pkr~ fdlh ljdkjh@ekU;rkizkIr laLFkk¼vksa½ esa
vk;qoSfnd fpfdRlk vf/kdkjh ds :Ik esa iakp o’kZ dk fDyfudy vuqHkoA
([k) okaNuh; vgZrk-&&fgekpy izns”k dh :f<+;ksa] jhfr;ksa vkSj cksfy;ksa dk Kku vkSj izns”k esa
fo|eku fof”k"V n”kkvksa esa fu;qfDr ds fy, mi;qDrrk A
8- lh/ks HkrhZ fd, tkus okys O;fDr;ksa ds fy, fofgr vk;q vkSj “kSf{kd vgZrk¼,a½] izksUur O;fDr;ksa
dh n”kk esa ykxw gkasxh ;k ugha-&&vk;q-&&ykxw ughaA
'kSf{kd vgZrk-&&gka] LrEHk la[;k 11 ds lkeus ;FkkfofgrA
9- Ikfjoh{kk dh vof/k] ;fn dksbZ gk-&&nks o"kZ] ftldk ,d o"kZ ls vuf/kd ,slh vkSj vof/k ds
fy, foLrkj fd;k tk ldsxk] tSlk l{ke izkf/kdkjh fo”ks"k ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa vkSj fyf[kr dkj.kksa ls vkns”k
nsA
7567
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
10- HkrhZ dh i)fr-&&HkrhZ lh/kh gksxh ;k izksUufr] izfrfu;qfDr] LFkkukUrj.k }kjk vkSj fofHkUu
i)fr;ksa }kjk Hkjs tkus okys inksa dh izfr”krrk-&&¼i) ipkl izfr”kr izksUufr }kjk]
(ii) ipkl izfr”kr lh/kh HkrhZ }kjk] ;FkkfLFkfr] fu;fer vk/kkj ij ;k lafonk ds vk/kkj ij
fu;qfDr }kjk] ,slk u gksus ij LFkkukUrj.k }kjk ;k lsd.MesUV vk/kkj ijA
11- izksUufr] izfrfu;qfDr] LFkkukUrj.k dh n”kk esa Jsf.k;ka] ftuls izksUufr@izfrfu;qfDr@
LFkkukUrj.k fd;k tk,xk-&&dk;kfpfdRlk ;k ckyjksx ;k izLkwfrra= ;k “kY;ra= ;k “kkYd;ra= ;k iapdekZ
dh fo”ks’kKrk esa de ls de rhu o’kZ dh fdlh ekU;rkizkIr ,e0Mh0¼vk;qosZn½ okys vk;qoZSfnd fpfdRlk
vf/kdkjh esa ls izksUufr }kjk] ftudk lacf/kr ,e0Mh0¼vk;qoSZn½ dh mikf/k ¼fMxzh½ izkIr djus ds Ik”pkr~
lacaf/kr fo”ks’kKrk esa de ls de iakp o’kZ dk fu;fer lsokdky ;k yxkrkj rnFkZ lsok] ;fn dksbZ gks] dks
lfEefyr djds ikap o’kZ dk fu;fer lsokdky gks] ,slk u gksus ij jkT; ljdkj ds vU; foHkkxksa ls
lerqY; in /kkj.k djus okys vkSj leku osrueku esa dk;Zjr in/kkfj;ksa esa ls LFkkukarj.k }kjk lsdsa.MesaV
ds vk/kkj ij%
ijUrq ofj’B vk;qoZsfnd fpfdRld ¼fo”ks’kK½ ds in dks Hkjus gsrw fuEufyf[kr nks fcUnq in vk/kkfjr
jksLVj dk vuqlj.k fd;k tk,xk%
fcUnq la[;k
oxZ
igyk in
iksUur O;fDr
nqljk in
lh/kh HkrhZ }kjk
fVIi.k-&&jksLVj izR;sd nwljs fcUnq ds Ik”pkr~ rc rd pØkuqØfer fd;k tk,xk] tc rd nksuksa
oxZ dks nh xbZ izfr”krrk }kjk izfrfuf/kRo izkIr ugha fd;k tkrk gSA RkRi”pkr~] fjfDr ml oxZ ls Hkjh
tk,xh ftlus in [kkyh fd;k gksA
(I) ijUrq izksUufr ds iz;kstu ds fy, izR;sd deZpkjh dks] tutkrh;@nqxZe {ks=ksa esa in (inksa) dh
,sls {ks=ksa esa i;kZIr la[;k dh miyC/krk ds v/;/khu] de ls de ,d dk;Zdky rd lsok djuh gksxh %
ijUrq ;g vkSj fd mi;qZDr ijUrqd (1) mu deZpkfj;ksa ds ekeys esa ykxw ugha gksxk] ftudh
vf/kof’kZrk ds fy, ikap o’kZ ;k mlls de dh lsok “ks’k jgh gks %
ijUrq ;g vkSj Hkh fd mu vf/kdkfj;ksa@deZpkfj;ksa dks] ftUgksaus tutkrh;@nqxZe {ks= esa de ls
de ,d dk;Zdky rd lsok ugha dh gS] ,sls {ks+= esa mlds vius laoxZ (dkMj) esa loZFkk ofj’Brk ds
vuqlkj LFkkukUrj.k fd;k tk,xk A
Li’Vhdj.k&I-&&mi;ZqDr ijUrqd ds iz;kstu ds fy, tutkrh;@nqxZe {ks=ksa esa “dk;Zdky” ls
lk/kkj.kr;k rhu o’kZ dh vof/k ;k iz”kklfud vis{kkvksa vkSj deZpkjh }kjk fd, x, dk;Z dks /;ku esa j[krs
gq,] ,sls {ks=ksa esa rSukrh dh blls de vof/k] vfHkizsr gksxh A
Li’Vhdj.k&II-&&mi;ZqDr ijUrqd ds iz;kstu ds fy, tutkrh;@nqxZe {ks= fuEu izdkj ls
gksaxs %&&
1- ftyk ykgkSy ,oa fLifr A
2- pEck ftyk dk ikaxh vkSj HkjekSj mi&e.My A
3- jksgMw mi&e.My dk MksMjk&Dokj {ks= A
7568
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
4- ftyk f”keyk dh jkeiqj rglhy dk iUnzg chl ijxuk] equh’k] njdkyh vkSj xzke iapk;r
dk”kkikV A
5- dqYyw ftyk dk iUnzg chl ijxuk A
6- dkaxM+k ftyk ds oStukFk mi&e.My dk cM+k&Hkaxky {ks= A
7- ftyk fdUukSj A
8- fljekSj ftyk esa mi&rglhy dejkm ds dkBokM vkSj dksjxk iVokj o`Rr] js.kqdkth rglhy
ds HkykM Hkyksuk vkSj laxuk iVokj o`Rr vkSj f”kykbZ rglhy dk dksVk iko iVokj o`Rr A
9- e.Mh ftyk esa djlksx rglhy dk [kU;ksy cxMk iVokj o`Rr] okyh pkSdh mi&rglhy ds
xkMk xkslkabZ] eB;kuh] ?ku;kM+ Fkkph] okxh] lksexkM+] i)j rglhy ds >kjokM+ dqVx<+]
xzkeu] nsox<+] <Syk] jksik] dFkjksx] flYg HkM+okuh] gLriqj]?kejsM+ vkSj HkVs<+ iVokj o`Rr]
Fkqukx rglhy ds fp;quh] dkyhikj] ekux< + Fkkp cxM+k mRrjh ex: vkSj nf{k.k esx:
iVok o`Rr vkSj lqUnjuxj rglhy dk cVokM+k iVokj o`Rr A
¼1½ izksUufr ds lHkh ekeyksa esa in ij fu;fer fu;qfDr ls iwoZ lEHkjd ¼iks’kd½ in esa dh xbZ
yxkrkj rnFkZ lsok] ;fn dksbZ gks] izksUufr ds fy, bu fu;eksa esa ;Fkkfofgr lsokdky ds fy,] bl “krZ ds
v/khu jgrs gq, x.kuk esa yh tk,xh fd lEHkjd izoxZ esa rnFkZ fu;qfDr@izksUufr] HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;eksa
ds micU/kksa ds vuqlkj p;u dh mfpr Lohdk;Z izfd;k dks viukus ds i”pkr~ dh xbZ Fkh %
ijUrq mu lHkh ekeyksa es]a ftuesa dksbZ dfu"B O;fDr lEHkjd in esa vius dqy lsokdky ¼rnFkZ
vk/kkj ij dh xbZ lsok lfgr] tks fu;fer lsok@fu;qfDr ds vuqlj.k esa gks) ds vk/kkj ij mi;qZDr fufnZ"V
micU/kksa ds dkj.k fopkj fd, tkus dk ik= gks tkrk gS] ogka vius vius izoxZ@in@dkMj esa mlls
ofj"B lHkh O;fDr fopkj fd, tkus ds ik= le>s tka,xs vkSj fopkj djrs le; dfu"B O;fDr ls Åij
j[ks tka,xs %
ijUrq ;g vkSj fd mu lHkh in/kkfj;ksa dh] ftu ij izksUufr ds fy, fopkj fd;k tkuk gS] de ls
de rhu o"kZ dh U;wure vgZrk lsok ;k in ds HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;eksa esa fofgr lsok] tks Hkh de gks]
gksxh %
ijUrq ;g vkSj Hkh fd tgka dksbZ O;fDr iwoZxkeh ijUrqd dh vis{kkvksa ds dkj.k izksUufr fd, tkus
lEcU/kh fopkj ds fy, vik= gks tkrk gS] ogka mlls dfu"B O;fDr Hkh ,slh izksUufr ds fopkj ds fy,
vik+= le>k tk,xk@le>s tk,axs A
Li"Vhdj.k-&&vfUre ijUrqd ds vUrxZr dfu’B in/kkjh izksUufr ds fy, vik= ugha le>k
tk,xk] ;fn ofj"B vik= O;fDr HkwriwoZ lSfud gS] ftls fMekschykbZTM vkeZM QksflZt ijlksuy ¼fjtosZ”ku
vkQ oSdsUlht bu fgekpy LVsV uku&VsDuhdy lfoZlht½ :Yt] 1972 ds fu;e&3 ds micU/kksa ds
vUrxZr HkrhZ fd;k x;k gks vkSj buds vUrxZr ojh;rk ykHk fn, x, gksa ;k ftls ,Dl lfoZleSu
¼fjtosZ”ku vkQ oSdsUlht bu nh fgekpy izns”k VsDuhdy lfoZlht½ :Yt] 1985 ds fu;e&3 ds micU/kksa
ds vUrxZr HkrhZ fd;k x;k gks vkSj blds vUrxZr ojh;rk ykHk fn, x, gksa A
¼2½ blh izdkj LFkk;hdj.k ds lHkh ekeyksa esa ,sls in ij fu;fer fu;qfDr@izksUufr ls iwoZ
lEHkjd in ij dh xbZ yxkrkj rnFkZ lsok] ;fn dksbZ gks] lsokdky ds fy, x.kuk esa yh tk,xh] ;fn
rnFkZ fu;qfDr@izksUufr] mfpr p;u ds i”pkr~ vkSj HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;eksa ds micU/kksa ds vuqlkj dh
xbZ Fkh %
ijUrq dh xbZ mi;qZDr fufnZ"V rnFkZ lsok dks x.kuk esa ysus ds i'pkr~] tks LFkk;hdj.k gksxk] mlds
QyLo:i ikjLifjd ojh;rk vifjofrZr jgsxh A
12- ;fn foHkkxh; izksUufr lfefr] fo|eku gks rks mldh lajpuk-&&tSlh ljdkj }kjk le;
le; ij xfBr dh tk,A
7569
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
13- HkrhZ djus esa ftu ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa fgekpy izns”k yksd lsok vk;ksx ls ijke”kZ fd;k
tk,xk-&&tSlk fof/k }kjk visf{kr gksA
14- Lkh/kh HkrhZ ds fy, vfuok;Z vis{kk-&&fdlh lsok ;k in ij fu;qfDr ds fy, vH;FkhZ dk Hkkjr
dk ukxfjd gksuk vfuok;Z gS A
15- Lkh/kh HkrhZ }kjk in ij fu;qfDr ds fy, p;u-&&Lkh/kh HkrhZ ds ekeys esa in ij fu;qfDr ds
fy, p;u] ekSf[kd ijh{kk ds vk/kkj ij fd;k tk,xkA ;fn] ;FkkfLFkfr fgekpy izns”k yksd lsok vk;ksx
;k vU; HkrhZ izkf/kdj.k ,slk djuk vko”;d ;k lehphu le>s] rks fyf[kr ijh{kk ;k O;kogkfjd ijh{kk ds
vk/kkj ij fd;k tk,xk] ftldk Lrj@ikB~;Øe bR;kfn] ;FkkfLFkfr vk;ksx@vU; HkrhZ izkf/kdj.k }kjk
vo/kkfjr fd;k tk,xk A
15 ¼d½- lafonk ds vk/kkj ij lh/kh HkrhZ }kjk in ij fu;qfDr ds fy, p;u-&&bu fu;eksa esa
fdlh ckr ds gksrs gq, Hkh in ij lafonk fu;qfDr;k] uhps fn, x, fucU/kuksa vkSj “krksZ ds v/;/khu dh
tk,axh%&
(I) ldaYiuk-&&¼d½ bl ikWfylh ds v/khu vk;qosZn foHkkx esa Okfj’Bvk;qosZfnd fpfdRld
¼fo”ks’kK½ dks lafonk ds vk/kkj ij izkjEHk esa ,d o"kZ ds fy, yxk;k tk,xk] ftls o"kkZuqo"kZ vk/kkj ij
c<+k;k tk ldsxk %
ijUrq lafonk vof/k esa o’kkZuqo’kZ vk/kkj ij [email protected] ds fy, lEc) foHkkxk/;{k] ;g
izek.k i= tkjh djsxk fd lafonk ij fu;qDr O;fDr dh lsok rFkk vkpj.k] o’kZ ds nkSjku larks’ktud ik;k
x;k gS vkSj rHkh mldh lafonk vof/k uohd`r@foLrkfjr dh tk,xhA
¼[k½ in dk fgekpy izns”k yksd lsok vk;ksx ds dk;Z{ks= esa vkuk-&&iz/kku lfpo@lfpo
¼vk;qosZn½] fgekpy izns”k ljdkj] fjDr inksa dks lafonk ds vk/kkj ij Hkjus ds fy, ljdkj dk vuqeksnu
izkIr djus ds i”pkr~ v/;is{kk dks lEc) HkrhZ vfHkdj.k] vFkkZr~ fgekpy izns”k yksd lsok vk;ksx ds le{k
j[ksxk A
¼x½ p;u] HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;eksa esa fofgr ik=rk “krkZsa ds vuqlkj fd;k tk,xk A
¼II½ lafonkRed miyfC/k;ka-&&Lakfonk ds vk/kkj ij fu;qDr Okfj’B vk;qosZfnd fpfdRld ¼fo”ks’kK½
dks 22]200@&:Ik, dh lesfdr fu;r lafonkRed jde ¼tks is cS.M dk U;wure tek xzsM is ds cjkcj
gksxh½ izfrekl lanRr dh tk,xhA ;fn lafonk esa ,d o"kZ ls vf/kd dh c<kSrjh dh tkrh gS] rks i”pkr~orhZ
o’kZ ¼o’kksZ½ ds fy, lafonkRed miyfC/k;ksa esa 666@&:Ik, dh jde ¼in ds Iks cS.M dk U;wure tek xzsM is
dk rhu izfr”kr~½ okf"kZd o`f) ds :Ik esa vuqKkr dh tk,xha A
¼III½ fu;qfDr@vuq”kklu izkf/kdkjh-&&iz/kku lfpo ¼vk;qosZn½@lfpo ¼vk;qosZn½] fgekpy izns”k
ljdkj fu;qfDr vkSj vuq”kklu izkf/kdkjh gksxk A
¼IV½ p;u izfØ;k-&&lafonk fu;qfDr dh n”kk esa in ij fu;qfDr ds fy, p;u] ekSf[kd ijh{kk ds
vk/kkj ij fd;k tk,xk ;k ;fn vko”;d ;k lehphu le>k tk,] rks fyf[kr ijh{kk ;k O;kogkfjd ijh{kk
ds vk/kkj ij fd;k tk,xk] ftldk Lrj@ikB~;Øe bR;kfn lEc) HkrhZ vfHkdj.k] vFkkZr~ fgekpy izns”k
yksd lsok vk;ksx }kjk vo/kkfjr fd;k tk,xk A
(V) lafonkRed fu;fqDr ds fy, p;u lfefr-&&tSlh lac) HkrhZ vfHkdj.k] vFkkZr~ fgekpy izns”k
yksd lsok vk;ksx }kjk le;≤ ij xfBr dh tk,A
7570
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
(VI) djkj-&&vH;FkhZ dks] p;u ds Ik”pkr~] bu fu;eksa ls lyaXu mikcU/k&[k ds vuqlkj djkj
gLrk{kfjr djuk gksxkA
(VII) fucU/ku vkSj 'krsaZ-&&¼d½ lafonk ij fu;qDr O;fDr dks 22]200@& #i, dh fu;r
lafonkRed jde ¼ tks is cS.M dk U;wure tek xzsM is ds cjkcj gksxh½ izfrekl lanRr dh tk,xhA lafonk
ij fu;qDr O;fDr vkxs c<k, x, o’kksZs ds fy, lafonkRed jde esa 666@&:Ik, ¼in ds is&cSaM dk
U;wure tek xzsM is dk rhu izfr”kr~½ dh o`f) dk gdnkj gksxk vkSj vU; dksbZ lgc) izlqfo/kk,a] tSls
ofj’B@p;u osrueku vkfn ugha fn;k tk,xk A
¼[k½ lafonk ij fu;qDr O;fDr dh lsok iw.kZr;k vLFkk;h vk/kkj ij gksxh A ;fn lafonk ij fu;qDr
O;fDr dk dk;[email protected] Bhd ugha ik;k tkrk gS] rks fu;qfDr lekIr fd, tkus ds fy, nk;h gksxh A
¼x½ lafonk ij fu;qDr O;fDr ,d ekl dh lsok iwjh djus ds Ik”pkr~] ,d fnu ds vkdfLed
vodk”k dk gdnkj gksxkA rFkkfi] lafonk ij fu;qDr deZpkjh ckjg lIrkg ds izlwfr vodk”k vkSj nl
fnu ds fpfdRlk vodk”k dk gdnkj Hkh gksxk@gksxhA og fpfdRlk izfriwfrZ vkSj ,y0Vh0lh0 bR;kfn ds
fy, Hkh gdnkj ugha gksxk@gksxhA lafonk ij fu;qDr O;fDr dks mijksDr ds flok; fdlh izdkj dk vU;
dksbZ vodk”k vuqKkr ugha gksxk%
Ikjarq vuqiHkqDr vkdfLed vodk”k vkSj fpfdRlk vodk”k ,d dyS.Mj o’kZ rd lafpr fd;k tk
ldsxk vkSj vxkeh dyS.Mj o’kZ ds fy, vxzuhr ugha fd;k tk,xkA ¼?k½ fu;U=d vf/kdkjh ds vuqeksnu
ds fcuk lsok ls vuf/kd`r vuqifLFkfr ls Lor% gh lafonk dk Ik;Zolku ¼lekiu½ gks tk,xkA lafonk ij
fu;qDr O;fDr dRrZO; ¼M~;wfV½ ls vuqifLFkfr dh vof/k ds fy, lafonkRed jde dk gdnkj ugha gksxk A
¼³½ lafonk ij fu;qDr deZpkjh] ftlus rSukrh ds ,d LFkku ij ikap o’kZ dk dk;Zdky iw.kZ dj
fy;k gS] vko”;drk ds vk/kkj ij LFkkUkkUrj.k gsrq ik= gksxk] tgka Hkh iz”kklfud vk/kkj ij ,slk djuk
visf{kr gks A
¼p½ p;fur vH;FkhZ dks ljdkjh@jftLVªhd`r fpfdRlk O;olk;h ls viuk vkjksX; izek.k i=
izLrqr djuk gksxkA ckjg lIrkg ls vf/kd dh xHkZorh efgyk vH;FkhZ izlo gksus rd] vLFkk;h rkSj ij
vuqIk;qDr cuh jgsxhA efgyk vH;fFk;ksZ dk fdlh izkf/kd`r fpfdRlk vf/kdkjh@O;olk;h }kjk mi;qDrrk
ds fy, iqu% ijh{k.k fd;k tk,xk A
¼N½ lafonk ij fu;qDr O;fDr dk] ;fn vius inh; dÙkZO;ksa ds lEcU/k esa nkSjs ij tkuk visf{kr gks]
rks og mlh nj ij] tSlh fu;fer izfrLFkkuh deZpkfj;ksa dks osrueku ds U;wure ij ykxw gS] ;k=k
HkRrs@nSfud HkRrs dk gdnkj gksxk@gksxh A
¼t½ fu;fer deZpkfj;ksa dh n”kk esa ;Fkk ykxw lsok fu;eksa ds micU/k] tSls ,Q-vkj-,l-vkj] NqVVh
fu;e] lk/kkj.k Hkfo’; fuf/k fu;e] isU”ku fu;e rFkk vkpj.k fu;e vkfn lafonk ij fu;qDr O;fDr;ksa dh
n”kk esas ykxw ugha gksaxsA os bl LRkEHk esa ;Fkkof.kZr miyfC/k;ksa vkfn ds fy, gdnkj gksaxs A
16- vkj{k.k-&&lsok esa fu;qfDr] fgekpy izns”k ljdkj }kjk le;≤ ij vuqlwfpr
tkfr;ksa@vuqlwfpr tu&tkfr;ksa@vU; fiNM+s oxksZa vkSj vU; izoxZ ds O;fDr;ksa ds fy, Lksokvksa esa vkj{k.k
dh ckcr tkjh fd, x, vkns”kksa ds v/khu gksxh A
17- foHkkxh; ijh{kk-&&lsok esa izR;sd lnL; dks le;≤ ij ;Fkk la”kksf/kr foHkkxh; ijh{kk
fu;e] 1997 esa ;Fkk fofgr foHkkxh; ijh{kk mRrh.kZ djuh gksxh A
18- f”kfFky djus dh “kfDr-&&Tkgka jkT; ljdkj dh ;g jk; gks fd ,slk djuk vko”;d ;k
lehphu gS] ogka og] dkj.kksa dks fyf[kr esa vfHkfyf[kr djds vkSj fgekpy izns”k yksd lsok vk;ksx ds
7571
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
ijke”kZ ls] vkns”k }kjk] bu fu;eksa ds fdUgh micU/kksa dks fdlh oxZ ;k O;fDr ¼O;fDr;ksasa½ ds izoxZ ;k in
¼inksa½ dh ckcr] f”kfFky dj ldsxh A
&&&&&&&
mikcU/k&[k
ofj’B vk;qosZfnd fpfdRld¼fo”ks’kK½ vkSj fgekpy izns”k ljdkj ds e/; iz/kku lfpo@lfpo ¼vk;qosZn½]
fgekpy izns”k ljdkj ds ek/;e ls fu’ikfnr dh tkus okyh lafonk@djkj dk izk:Ik
;g djkj Jh@Jherh --------------------------------------------iq= iq=h Jh ----------------------- fuoklh--------------------------------------]
lafonk ij fu;qDr O;fDr ¼ftls blesa blds Ik”pkr~ ^^izFke Ik{kdkj** dgk x;k gS½ vkSj fgekpy izns”k dh
jkT;iky] ds e/; iz/kku lfpo@lfpo vk;qosZn] fgekpy izns”k ljdkj ¼ftls blesa blds Ik”pkr~ ^^f}rh;
Ik{kdkj** dgk x;k gS½ ds ek/;e ls vkt rkjh[k-------dks fd;k x;k A
^^f}rh; Ik{kdkj** us mijksDr ^^izFke Ik{kdkj** dks yxk;k gS vkSj izFke i{kdkj us ofj’B vk;qosZfnd
fpfdRld¼fo”ks’kK½ ds :Ik esa lafonk ds vk/kkj ij fuEufyf[kr fucU/ku vkSj “krksZ ij lsok djus ds fy,
lgefr nh gS%&
1- ;g fd izFke Ik{kdkj ofj’B vk;qosZfnd fpfdRld¼fo”ks’kK½ ds :Ik esa-------------------ls izkjEHk gksus
vkSj ----------- dks lekIr gksus okys fnu rd] ,d o"kZ dh vof/k ds fy, f}rh; Ik{kdkj dh lsok
esa jgsxkA ;g fofufnZ"V :Ik ls mfYyf[kr fd;k x;k gS vkSj nksuksa Ik{kdkjksa }kjk djkj ik;k
x;k gS fd izFke Ik{kdkj dh f}rh; Ik{kdkj ds lkFk lafonk] vkf[kjh dk;Z fnol dks vFkkZr~-----
fnu dks loa;eso gh Ik;Zoflr ¼lekIr½ gks tk,xh vkSj lwpuk uksfVl vko”;d ugha gksxk %
ijUrq o’kkZuqo’kZ vk/kkj ij lafonk dh vof/k esa [email protected] ds fy, foHkkxk/;{k ;g
izek.k i= tkjh djsxk fd lafonk ij fu;qDr O;fDr dh lsok rFkk vkpj.k] o’kZ ds nkSjku
larks’ktud jgk gS vkSj dsoy rHkh mldh lafonk dh vof/k dks foLrkfjr@uohd`Ÿk dh
tk,xhA
2- izFke Ik{kdkj dh lafonkRed jde 22,200@& #Ik, izfr ekl gksxhA
3- izFke Ik{kdkj dh lsok iw.kZr;k vLFkk;h vk/kkj ij gksxhA ;fn lafonk ij fu;qDr O;fDr dk
dk;[email protected] Bhd ugha ik;k tkrk gS ;k ;fn fu;fer in/kkjh ml fjfDr ds fo:)
fu;qDr@rSukr dj fn;k tkrk gS] ftlds fy, izFke i{kdkj dks lafonk ij yxk;k x;k gS]
rks fu;qfDr Ik;Zoflr ¼lekIr½ dh tkus ds fy, nk;h gksxh@gksxkA
4- lafonk ij fu;qDr ofj’B vk;qosZfnd fpfdRld¼fo”ks’kK½ ,d ekl dh lsok iwjh djus ds
Ik”pkr~ ,d fnu ds vkdfLed vodk”k dk gdnkj gksxkA rFkkfi lafonk ij fu;qDr deZpkjh
ckjg lIrkg ds izlwfr vodk”k vkSj nl fnu ds fpfdRlk vodk”k ds fy, Hkh gdnkj
gksxk@gksxhA og fpfdRlk izfriwfrZ vkSj ,y0Vh0lh0 bR;kfn ds fy, gdnkj ugha
gksxk@gksxhA lafonk ij fu;qDr O;fDr dks mijksDr ds flok; fdlh vU; izdkj dk dksbZ
vodk”k vuqKkr ugh gksxk%
Ikjarq vuqiHkqDr vkdfLed vodk”k vkSj fpfdRlk vodk”k ,d dYkS.Mj o’kZ rd lafpr fd;k
tk ldsxk vkSj vkxkeh dyS.Mj o’kZ ds fy, vxzuhr ugh fd;k tk,xkA
5- fu;U=d vf/kdkjh ds vuqeksnu ds fcuk dRrZO;ksa ls vuf/kd`r vuqifLFkfr ls Lor% gh lafonk
dk Ik;kZolku ¼lekiu½ gks tk,xkA lafonkRed ofj’B vk;qosZfnd fpfdRld¼fo”ks’kK½ dRrZO;
¼M~;wfV½ ls vuqifLFkfr dh vof/k ds fy, lafonkRed jde dk gdnkj ugha gksxkA
7572
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
6- lafonk ds vk/kkj ij fu;qDr deZpkjh] ftlus rSukrh ds ,d LFkku ij ikap o’kZ dk dk;Zdky
iw.kZ dj fy;k gS] vko”;drk ds vk/kkj ij LFkkukUrj.k gsrq ik= gksxk] tgka Hkh iz”kklfud
vk/kkj ij ,slk djuk visf{kr gksA
7- p;fur vH;FkhZ dks ljdkjh@jftLVhd`r O;olk;h] ls viuk vkjksX; izek.k Ik= izLrqr djuk
gksxkA efgyk vH;fFkZ;ksa dh n”kk esa] ckjg lIrkg ls vf/kd dh xHkZkoLFkk] izlo gksus rd]
mls vLFkk;h rkSj ij vuqi;qDr cuk nsxhA efgyk vH;fFkZ;ksa dk fdlh izkf/kd`r fpfdRlk
vf/kdkjh@O;olk;h }kjk mi;qDrrk ds fy, iqu% ijh{k.k fd;k tkuk pfkg,A
8- lafonk ij fu;qDr O;fDr dk] ;fn vius inh; dÙkZO;ksa ds lEcU/k esa nkSjs ij tkuk visf{kr
gks] rks og mlh nj ij] tSlh fu;fer izfrLFkkuh vf/kdkjh dks osrueku ds U;wure ij ykxw
gS] ;k=k HkRrs@nSfud HkRrs dk gdnkj gksxk@gksxhA
9- lafonk ij fu;qDr O;fDr¼;ksa½ dks deZpkjh lkewfgd chek ;kstuk ds lkFk&lkFk bZ0ih0,Q0@
th0ih0,Q0 Hkh ykxw ugha gksxkA
blds lk{;Lo:Ik izFke Ik{kdkj vkSj f}rh; Ik{kdkj us blesa loZizFke mfYyf[kr rkjh[k dks
vius&vius gLrk{kj dj fn, gSa A
lk{kh dh mifLFkfr esa
1-
------------------------------------------------
izFke Ik{kdkj ds gLrk{kj
uke ----------------------------------------------
irk ----------------------------------------------
2-
-----------------------------------------------
irk ----------------------------------------------
uke
----------------------------------------------
lk{kh dh mifLFkfr esa
1-
-----------------------------------------------
f}rh; Ik{kdkj ds gLrk{kj
uke ----------------------------------------
irk -----------------------------------------
2-
-----------------------------------------------
irk ----------------------------------------------
uke
----------------------------------------------
&&&&&&&&&&
[Authoritative English Text of this Department’s Notification No. Ayur-A(3)-3/2009 dated
23-03-2013 As required under clause(3) of Article 348 of the Constitution of India].
DEPARTMENT OF AYURVEDA
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171002, the 23rd March, 2013
No. Ayur-A(3)-9/2010.—In exercise of the powers conferred by proviso to Article 309 of
the Constitution of India, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, in consultation with H.P. Public Service
7573
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
Commission, is pleased to make the Recruitment and Promotion Rules for the post of Senior
Ayurvedic Chikitsak(Specialist), Class-I(Gazetted) in the Department of Ayurveda, Himachal
Pradesh, as per Annexure-‘A’ attached to this notification, namely :—
1. Short title & Commencement.—(1) These rules may be called the Himachal Pradesh,
Department of Ayurveda, Senior Ayurvedic Chikitsak (Specialist), Class-I (Gazetted),Recruitment
& Promotion Rules, 2013.
(2) These rules shall come into force from the date of publication in the Rajpatra,
Himachal Pradesh.
2.
Repeal & Savings.—(1) The Himachal Pradesh Department of Indian System of
Medicine and Homeopathy, Class-II, service(Senior Ayurvedic Chikitsak) Recruitment &
Promotion Rules,1989 notified vide this Department Notification No.Health-A(3)-5/87 Dated 16-
02-1989 are hereby repealed.
(2) Notwithstanding such repeal, any appointment made or anything done or any action
taken under the relevant rules so repealed under sub rule 2(1) supra shall be deemed to have been
validly made, done or taken under these rules.
By order,
Sd/-
Principal Secretary (Ayurveda).
_________
Annexure-A
Recruitment and Promotion Rules for the post of Senior Ayurvedic Chikitsak (Specialist)
(Class- I-Gazetted) in the Department of Ayurveda, Himachal Pradesh
1. Name of Post.—Senior Ayurvedic Chikitsak(Specialist)
2. Number of Post(s).—18(Eighteen)
3. Classification.—Class-I (Gazetted)
4. Scale of Pay.—(i) Pay Scale for regular incumbent(s).—Rs.15600-39100 + 6600/-
Grade Pay.
(ii) Emoluments for contract employee.—Rs. 22,200/-Grade pay as per details given in
Col.15-A.
5. Whether selection or Non-selection post.—Selection
6. Age for direct Recruitment.—45 years and below
Provided that the upper age limit for direct recruits will not be applicable to the candidates
already in service of the Govt. including those who have been appointed adhoc or on contract basis;
Provided further that if a candidate appointed on adhoc basis or on contract basis had
become over-age on the date when he/she was appointed as such he/she shall not be eligible for any
relaxation in the prescribed age limit by virtue of his/her such adhoc or contract appointment;
7574
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
Provide further that upper age limit is relaxable for Scheduled Castes/Scheduled
Tribes/Other categories of persons to the extent permissible under the general or special order(s) of
the Himachal Pradesh Government;
Provided further that the employees of all the Public Sector Corporations and Autonomous
Bodies who happened to be Government servants before absorption in Public Sector
Corporations/Autonomous Bodies at the time of initial of such constitutions of such Corporations/
Autonomous Bodies shall be allowed age concession will not, however, be admissible to such staff
of the Public Sector Corporation/Autonomous Bodies and who are/were Finally absorbed in the
service of such Corporations/Autonomous after initial constitution of the Public Sector
Corporations/Autonomous Bodies.
(1) Age limit for direct recruitment will be reckoned on the first day of the year in which
the post(s) is/are advertised for inviting applications or notified to the Employment Exchanges or as
the case may be.
(2) Age and experience in the case of direct recruitment, relaxable at the discretion of the
Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission in case the candidate is otherwise will qualified.
7. Minimum
Educational
and
other
qualifications
required
for
direct
recruitment(s).—(a) Essential Qualification(s).—(i) M.D. (Ayurveda) of at least 3(three) years
duration in Kayachikitsa or Balroga or Prasuti Tantra or Shalaya Tantra or Shalkya Tantra or
Panchkarma from an Institution recognized by Central Council of Indian Medicines/ Government
of Himachal Pradesh.
(ii) Five year clinical experience in a Government/ recognized Institution(s) as Ayurvedic
Medical Officer after doing Post Graduation in the concerned speciality.
(b) Desirable Qualifications.—Knowledge of customs, manner and dialects of H.P. and
suitability for appointment in the peculiar conditions prevailing in the Pradesh.
8. Whether age and educational qualification prescribed for direct recruits will
apply in the case of the promotees.—Age.—Not applicable.
Educational Qualification.—Yes, As prescribed against Column No.11 below.
9. Period of probation, if any.—Two years subject to such further extension for a period
not exceeding one year as may be ordered by the competent authority in special circumstances and
reasons to be recorded in writing.
10. Method of recruitment whether by direct recruitment or by promotion
deputation, transfer and the percentage of posts to be filled in by various methods.—1. 50%
by promotion ;
2. 50% by direct recruitment on regular basis or by recruitment on contract basis, as the
case may be, failing which by transfer/on secondment basis.
11. In case of recruitment by promotion, deputation, transfer, grade from which
promotion/deputation/transfer is to be made.—By promotion from amongst the Ayurvedic
Medical Officer having a recognized M.D.(Ayurveda) of atleast three years duration in the
speciality of Kayachikitsa or Balroga or Prasuti Tantra or Shalya Tantra or Shalkya Tantra or
Panchkarma with atleast five years regular service or regular combined with continuous adhoc
7575
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
service, if any, in the concerned speciality after acquiring the concerned M.D.(Ayurveda) degree
failing which by transfer/on secondment basis from amongst the incumbents holding equivalent
posts and working in the identical pay scale from other Departments of State Government.
Provided that for filling up the post of Senior Ayurvedic Chikitsak (Specialist), the
following two points post based roster shall be followed:—
Point No.
Category
1st post
Promotee
2nd post
Direct recruit
Note.—The roster will be rotated after every 2nd point till the representation to both
categories is achieved by the given percentage. Thereafter, the vacancy is to be filled up from the
category which vacates the post.
A(I) Provided that for the purpose of promotion every employee shall have to serve at least
one term in the Tribal/Difficult areas subject to adequate number of post(s) available in such areas;
Provided further that the proviso A(I) supra shall not be applicable in the case of those employees
who have five years or less service, left for superannuation.
Provided further that Officers/Officials who have not served at least one tenure in
Tribal/difficult area shall be transferred to such area strictly in accordance with his/her seniority
in the respective cadre.
Explanation-I.—For the purpose of proviso A(I) supra the “ term” in Tribal/ difficult areas
shall mean normally three years or less period of posting in such areas keeping in view of the
administrative requirements and performance of the employee.
Explanation-II.—For the purpose of proviso I supra the Tribal/difficult areas shall be as
under:—
1. District Lahaul & Spiti.
2. Pangi and Bharmour Sub-Division of Chamba District.
3. Dodra Kawar area of Rohru Sub-Division.
4. Pandrah Bis Pargana, Munish darkali and Gram Panchyat Kashapat, Gram Panchayat
Kashapat, Gram Panchayats of Rampur Tehsil of District Shimla.
5. Pandrah Bis Pargana of Kullu District.
6. Bara Bhangal Area of Baijnath Sub-Division of Kangra District.
7. District Kinnuar.
8. Kathwar and Korga Patwa Circles of Kamrau Sub- Tehsil Bhaladh Bhalona and Sanga
Patwar Circles of Renukaji Tehsil and Kota Pab Patwar Circle of Shilai Tehsil of
Sirmour District.
9. Khanyol-Bagra Patwar Circle of Karsog Tehsil, Gada Gusaaini, Mathyani, Gharyar,
Thachi, Baggi, Somgad and Kholanal of Bali-Chowki Sub Tehsil, Jharwar, Kutgarh,
Graman, Devgar, Trailla, Ropa, Kathog, Silh-Badhwani, Hastpur, Ghamrehar and
Bhatehar Patwar Circle of Pathar Tehsil, Chuni, Kalipar, Mangarh, Thach-Bagra,
North Magru and south Magru Patwar Circles of Thunag Tehsil and Batwara Patwar
Circle of Sundernagar Tehsil in Mandi District.
(i) In all cases of promotion, the continuous adhoc service rendered in the feeder post, if
any, prior to regular appointment to the post shall be taken into account towards the length of
service as prescribed in these Rules for promotion subject to condition that the adhoc appointment/
7576
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
promotion in the feeder category had been made after following proper acceptable process of
selection in accordance with the provision of R&P rules.
Provided that in all cases where a junior person becomes eligible for consideration by virtue
of his/her total length of service(including the service rendered on adhoc basis, followed by regular
service/appointment) in the feeder post in view the provision referred to above, all persons senior to
him/her in the respective category/ post/ cadre shall be deemed to be eligible for consideration and
placed above the junior person in the field of consideration;
Provided that all incumbents to be re-considered for promoton shall possess the minimum
qualifying service of at least three years or that prescribed in the Recruitment and Promotion Rules
for the post, whichever is less;
Provided further that where a person becomes ineligible to be considered for promotion on
account of the requirements of the preceding proviso, the persons(s) junior to him/her shall also be
deemed to be ineligible for consideration for such promotion;
Explanation.—The last provisio shall not render the junior incumbent(s) ineligible for
consideration for promotion if the senior ineligible person(s) happened to be ex-servicemen
recruited under the provisions of Rule-3 of Demobilised Armed forces Personnel (Reservation of
vacancies in Himachal State Non-Technical Services) Rules, 1972 and having been given the
benefit of seniority of Rules-3 of Ex-servicemen (Reservation of vacancies in the Himachal
Pradesh Technical Service) Rules,1985 and having been given the benefit of seniority thereunder;
(ii) Similarly in all cases of confirmation adhoc service rendered on the feeder post, if any,
prior to the regular appointment/promotion against such post shall be taken into account towards
the length of service, if the adhoc appointment/promotion had been made after proper selection and
in accordance with the provison of the R&P Rules.
Provided that inter-se-seniority as a result of confirmation after taking into account, adhoc
service rendered as referred to above shall remain unchanged.
12. If a Departmental Promotion committee exists, what is its composition.—As may
be constituted by the Govt. from time to time.
13. Circumstances under which the H.P.P.S.C. is to be consulted in making
recruitment.—As required under the Law.
14. Essential requirement for a direct recruitment.—A candidate for appointment to
any service or post must be a Citizen of India.
15. Selection for appointment to post by direct recruitment.—Selection for
appointment to the post in the case of direct recruitment shall be made on the basis of viva-voce test
if H.P.Public Service Commission or other recruiting authority as the case may be, so consider
necessary or expedient by a written test or practical test, the standard/ syllabus etc. of which will be
determined by the commission/ other recruiting authority as the case may be.
15-A.
Selection for appointment to the post by direct recruitment on contract
basis.—Notwithstanding anything contained in these rules, contract appointments to the post will
be made subject to the terms and conditions given below:-
(I) Concept.—(a) Under this policy, Senior Ayurvedic Chikitsak(Specialist) in the
Department of Ayurveda will be engaged on contract basis initially for one year; which may be
extendable on year-to-year basis.
7577
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
Provided that for extension/ renewal of contract period on year to year basis the concerned
HOD shall issue a certificate that the service and conduct of the contract appointee is satisfactory
during the year and only then his period of contract is to be renewed/extended.
(b) Post falls within the purview of H.P.P.S.C.—The Principal Secretary (Ayurveda)/
Secretary (Ayurveda) to the Govt. of H.P. after obtaining the approval of the Government to fill up
the vacant posts on contract basis, will place the requisition with the concerned recruiting agency
i.e. H.P. Public Service Commision.
(c) The selection will be made in accordance with the eligibility conditions prescribed in
these R&P Rules.
(II) Contractual Emoluments.—The Senior Ayurvedic Chikitsak (Specialist) appointed
on contract basis will be paid consolidated fixed contractual amount @ Rs. 22,200/-per month
(which shall be equal to minimum of the pay band plus grade pay). An amount of Rs.666/-(3% of
the minimum of pay band plus grade pay of the post) as annual increase in contractual amoluments
for the subsequent year(s) will be allowed if contract is extended beyond one year.
(III) Appointing/Disciplinary Authority.—The Principal Secretary (Ayurveda)/ Secretary
(Ayurveda) to the Govt. of H.P. will be appointing and disciplinary authority.
(IV) Selection Process.—Selection for appointment to the post in the case ofcontract
appointment will be made on the basis of viva-voce test or if consider necessary or expedient by a
written test or practical test, the standard/syllabus etc. of which will be determined by the
concerned recruiting agency i.e H.P.Public Service Commission.
(V) Committee for selection of Contractual Appointment.—As may be constituted by
the concerned recruiting agency i.e. H.P. Public Service Commission from time to time.
(VI) Agreement.—After selection of a candidate, he/she shall sign an agreement as per
Annexure-B appended to these Rules.
(VII) Terms and Conditions.—(a) The contract appointee will be paid fixed contractual
amount @ Rs. 22,200/- per month (which shall be equal to minimum of the pay band plus grade
pay).The contract appointee will be entitled for an incease in contractual amount @ of Rs. 666/-
(3% of the minimum of pay band plus grade pay of the post) for further extended years and no
other allied benefits such as seniority/ selection scales etc. will be given.
(b) The service of the contract appointee will be purely on temporary basis. The
appointment is liable to be terminated in case the performance/ conduct of the contract appointee is
not found satisfactory.
(c) Contract appointee will be entitled for one day’s casual leave after putting one month
service. However, the contract employee will also be entitled for 12 weeks Maternity Leave and 10
day’s Medical Leave. He/She shall not be entitled for medical Re-imbursement and LTC etc. No
leave of any other kind except above is admissible to the contract appointee.
Provided that the un-availed Casual Leave and Medical leave can be accumulated upto the
Calendar Year and will not be carried forward for the next Calendar Year.
7578
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
(d) Unauthorized absence from the duty without the approval of the controlling officer
shall automatically lead to the termination of the contract. Contract appointee shall not be entitled
for contractual amount for the period of absence from duty.
(e) An official appointed on contract basis who has completed five years tenure at one
place of posting will be eligible for transfer on need based basis wherever required on
administrative grounds.
(f) Selected candidate will have to submit a certificate of his/her fitness from
Govt./Registered Medical Practitioner. Women candidate pregnant beyond 12 weeks will stand
temporarily unfit till the confinement is over. The women candidate will be re-examined for the
fitness from an authorized Medical Officer/Practitioner.
(g) Contract appointee will be entitled for TA/DA if required to go on tour in connection
with his/ her official duties at the same rate as applicable to regular counterpart official at the
minimum of pay scale.
(h) Provisions of service rules like FR,SR, Leave Rules, GPF Rules, Pension Rules and
Conduct Rules etc. as are applicable in case of regular employees will not be applicable in case of
contract appointees. They will be entitled for emoluments etc. as detailed in this column.
16. Reservation.—The appointment to the service shall be subject to order regarding
rerservation in the service for Secheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes/Other Backward Classes/Other
categories of persons issued by the Himachal Pradesh Government from time to time.
17. Departmental Examination.—Every member of the service shall pass a Departmental
Examination as prescribed in the Departmental Examination Rules, 1997 and as amended from
time to time.
18. Power to relax.—Where the State Govt. is of the opinion that it is necessary or
expedient to do so, it may, by order for reasons to be recorded in writing and in consultation with
the H.P.Public Service Commission relax any of the provisions of these rules with respect to any
class or category of person(s) or post(s).
____________
ANNEXURE-B
FORM OF CONTRACT/AGREEMENT TO BE EXECUTED BETWEEN THE SENIR
AYURVEDIC CHIKITSAK(SEPCIALIST) AND THE GOVERNMENT OF HIMACHAL
PRADESH THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY/SECRETARY (AYURVEDA)
TO THE GOVERNMENT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
This agreement is made on this________ day of _________in the year ______ between
Sh/Smt.____________________son/daughter of Shri_________________ R/o________________
______________________________________________________________contract
appointee
(here-in-after called the FIRST PARTY), AND the Governor, Himachal Pradesh through Principal
Secretary/Secretary (Ayurveda) to the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh (here-in-after the SECOND
PARTY). Whereas, the SECOND PARTY has engaged the aforesaid FIRST PARTY and FIRST
PARTY has agreed to serve as a Senior Ayurvedic Chikitsak(Specialist) on contract basis on the
following terms and conditions:—
7579
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
1. That the FIRST PARTY shall remain in the service of the SECOND PARTY as a
Senior Ayurvedic Chikitsak(Specialist) for a period of one year commencing on the
_________
day
of
___________
and
ending
on
___________
day
of__________________. It is specifically mentioned and agreed upon by both the
parties that the contract of the FIRST PARTY with the SECOND PARTY shall ipso
facto stand terminated on the last working day i.e. on ___________ and information
notice shall not be necessary.
Provided that for further extension/renewal of contract period the HOD shall issue a
certificate that the service and conduct of the contract appointee was satisfactory
during the year and only then the period of contract is to be renewed/extended.
2. The contractual amount of the FIRST PARTY will be Rs. 22,200 per month.
3. The service of FIRST PARTY will be purely on temporary basis. The appointment is
liable to be terminated in case the performance/conduct of the contract appointee is not
found good or if a regular incumbent is appointed/posted against the vacancy for which
the first party was engaged on contract.
4. Contractual Senior Ayurvedic Chikitsak(Specialist)will be entitled for one day casual
leave after putting one month service. However, the contract employee will also be
entitled for 12 weeks Maternity Leave and 10 day’s Medical Leave. He/She shall not
be entitled for medical Re-imbursement and LTC etc. No leave of any other kind
except above is admissible to the contract appointee.
Provided that the un-availed Casual Leave and Medical leave can be accumulated upto
the calendar year and will not be carried forward for the next calendar year.
5. Unauthorized absence from the duty without the approval of the Controlling Officer
shall automatically lead to the termination of the contract. A contractual Senior
Ayurvedic Chikitsak(Specialist) will not be entitled for contractual amount for the
period of absence from duty.
6. An official appointed on contract basis who have completed five years tenure at one
place of posting will be eligible for transfer on need based basis wherever required on
administrative grounds.
7. Selected candidate will have to submit a certificate of his/her fitness from
Govt./Registered Medical Practitioner. In case of women candidates pregnant beyond
12 weeks will render her temporarily unfit till the confinement is over. The woman
candidate should be re-examined for fitness from Govt./authorized Medical
Officer/Practitioner.
8. Contract appointee shall be entitled to TA/DA if required to go on tour in connection
with his/her official duties at the same rates as applicable to regular counterpart officer
at the minimum of the pay scale.
9. The Employees Group Insurance Scheme as well as EPF/GPF will not be applicable to
the contractual appointee(s).
IN WITNESS the FIRST PARTY and SECOND PARTY have herein to set their hands the
day, month and year first, above written.
7580
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
IN THE PRESENCE OF WITNESS:
1.
_______________________
(Signature of the FIRST PARTY)
Name ______________________
Address______________________
_______________________
2.
_______________________
Name _______________________
Address______________________
_______________________
IN THE PRESENCE OF WITNESS.
1.
_______________________
(Signature of the SECOND PARTY)
Name _______________________
Address______________________
_______________________
2.
_______________________
Name _______________________
Address______________________
_______________________
___________
LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2 , the 19th March, 2013
No. Sharm (A) 7-1/2005 (Award)-part-file.—In exercise of the powers vested in her under
section 17(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act,1947, the Governor Himachal Pradesh is pleased to
order the publication of awards announced by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Shimla of the
following cases on the website of Labour & Employment Department:-
Sr.
No.
Case No.
Title of the Case
Date ofAward
1.
45/2012
Shri Gurmukh Singh V/s Deepak Spinners Ltd.
Baddi.
14-2-2013
2.
49/2010
Sh. Hari Krishan V/S Hotel Himachal Shimla.
21-2-2013
3.
51//2010
Sh.Ramesh Kumar & others V/s -do-
21-2-2013
4.
20/2010
Sh.Dalip Singh V/s Planet Indrasuctures Ltd.
Solan.
27-2-2013
5.
47/2010
Sh. Karan Thakur V/S -do-
27-2-2013
6.
07/2010
Sh.Ganga Ram V/S -do-
27-2-2013
7.
102/2010
Sh. Sita Ram V/s DFO renkua & others
28-2-2013
8.
10/2010
Sh. Narinder Singh V/s Collector Forest Settlement
Nahan.
28-2-2013
9.
9/2010
Sh. Satveer Singh V/s -do-
28-2-2013
BY order
Sd/-
Addl.Chief Secretary ( Lab. & Emp.).
7581
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
IN THE COURT OF PURENDER VAIDYA, PRESIDING JUDGE, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-
CUM-LABOUR COURT, SHIMLA, (H.P).
Ref. No. 20 of 2010
Instituted on. 12.4.2010.
Decided on 27.2.2013.
Dalip Singh S/o Shri Hikmat Singh C/o Shyam General Store, Deonghat, Solan, Opp. Solan
(HP) through J.C Bhardwaj, President HP AITUC, HQ Saproon, Solan, H.P.
..Petitioner.
Vs.
M/s Planet Infrastructure Pvt., Ltd., Planet Tower Baba Balak Nath Bhawan, Opp. New Bus
Stand, By Pass Solan, District Solan, H.P. through its Managing Director.
..Respondent.
Reference under section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
For petitioner : Shri J. C Bhardwaj, AR.
For respondent : Exparte.
AWARD
The following reference has been received from appropriate government for adjudication:
“Whether retrenchment of Shri Dalip Singh S/o Shri Hikmat Singh employee of M/s Planet
Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Plant Tower Baba Balak Nath Bhawan, Opposite New Bus Stand,
Bye- Pass Solan, Tehsil & District Solan, H.P from the post of Driver w.e.f. 21.1.2009 is in
accordance with provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947? If not, what relief the
workman of above firm is entitled to?”
2. The petitioner filed the claim petition stating that he was employed as Tipper Driver in
the respondent company in the month of December, 2007. However, his services were orally and
illegally terminated without any notice by the respondent on 20.1.2009. At that time no
compensation in lieu of notice was paid to the petitioner. After the termination of petitioner, the
respondent employed new workmen. As such, the termination of petitioner was against the
provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Hence, the claim petition was filed with the prayer to
set aside the termination order. Petitioner further prayed for full back wages, seniority and
other consequential service benefits.
3. The respondent contested the claim petition by filing a reply wherein preliminary
objections as to maintainability and cause of action were taken. On merits, respondent stated that
the petitioner was appointed as Tipper Driver in May, 2008 and he was never terminated. In fact,
petitioner left the job on his own and joined another company namely Rewal Variety Construction
Ltd., Rajgarh Road, Oachghat, District Solan w.e.f. 4.12.2008. So, there was no occasion for the
respondent to retrench the petitioner. The petitioner never remained in active roll of the respondent
and he himself left the job on 4.12.2008. The respondent also denied that thereafter new workmen
were employed. Consequently, respondent prayed for the dismissal
of the claim petition.
4. Petitioner filed rejoinder wherein he denied all the averments made by the respondent
in reply and further reasserted the facts already stated by him in claim petition.
7582
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
5. On the pleadings of the parties, the following issues were framed.
1. Whether the termination of services of Shri Dalip Singh by the Managing Director
M/s Planet Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Solan w.e.f. 21.1.2009 is in violation of the
provisions of Industrial Disputes Act?
..OPP.
2. If issue no.1 is proved in affirmative to what relief the petitioner is entitled to?
..OPP.
3. Relief.
6. The aforesaid issues were read over and explained to both the parties. No other issue
was pressed or claimed. Thereafter, the case was listed for the evidence of petitioner.
7. After recording the evidence of petitioner, the case was fixed for the evidence of
respondent. The respondent availed six opportunities to lead evidence and finally on 10.1.2013
none appeared on behalf of respondent, hence, respondent was proceeded against exparte.
8. I have heard exparte arguments of petitioner and gone through the record carefully.
9. For the reasons to be recorded hereinafter my findings on the aforesaid issues are as
under:
Issue No. 1
Yes.
Issue No. 2
Entitled for re-instatement with seniority and continuity but without back wages.
Relief.
Reference answered in negative per operative part of award.
Reasons for finding.
Issue No. 1.
10. In view of arguments advanced on behalf of petitioner as well as evidence on record, I
am of the considered opinion that the termination of services of petitioner by the respondent w.e.f.
21.1.2009 is in violation of the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
11. The petitioner has alleged that he worked from December, 2007 to 20.1.2009 when he
was illegally terminated without any notice as required under section 25-F of Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947. For the same, petitioner was to establish that prior to 21.1.2009, he worked for 240 days
in a calendar year. If the petitioner could prove this fact only then the respondent was under the
legal obligation to serve a notice of one month’s to the petitioner or to pay him compensation in
lieu of such notice.
12. The petitioner as PW-1 has made a general statement in his affidavit Ex. PA that he
worked for 240 days in a calendar year prior to his termination and he was not served notice under
section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, by the respondent. But his testimony was questioned by the
respondent during his cross-examination, so, the general statement of petitioner is not sufficient to
prove that in fact he worked for 240 days in the preceding calendar year when he was terminated
from service w.e.f. 21.1.2009.
13. The petitioner also produced in evidence Ex. PA copy of log book of the vehicle which
he used to ply in order to show that he worked under the respondent. Although, Ex. PA is a
photocopy and its original was not shown to the Court. Since this document was produced by the
7583
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
petitioner, therefore, it can be looked into against the petitioner. If the contents of Ex. PA are
admitted to be true then it is revealing that as Driver of the vehicle, the petitioner remained on duty
for 116 days from 1.1.2008 to 19.1.2009. So, the documentary evidence produced by the petitioner
is also not proving his plea that he worked for 240 days prior to his termination w.e.f. 21.1.2009.
As the result, there is no violation of section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
14. At the same time, the petitioner has also taken the plea that after his termination, the
respondent employed new workmen and violated the provisions of section 25-H of Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947. He has categorically deposed this fact in his testimony. The cross-examination
of petitioner is revealing that this fact is not disputed by the respondent as no cross-examination
was conducted on this fact. That means the testimony of petitioner goes un-rebutted that after his
termination respondent employed new workmen.
15. The respondent has taken the plea that petitioner has left the job on his own on
4.12.2008 and joined another company. But on behalf of respondent no evidence was led in any
manner whatsoever to prove said plea. Consequently, in the absence of any evidence on behalf of
respondent, it cannot be held that the petitioner left the job on his own and joined another company
on 4.12.2008. Therefore, we have to believe the testimony of petitioner that he was terminated
w.e.f 21.1.2009 and after his termination respondent employed junior workmen. Section 25-H of
Industrial Disputes Act, reads as follows:
“Re-employment of retrenched workmen.- Where any workmen are retrenched, and the
employer proposes to take into his employ any persons, he shall, in such manner as may be
prescribed, give an opportunity 2*[to the retrenched workmen who are citizens of India to
offer themselves for re-employment and such retrenched workman] who offer themselves
for re-employment shall have preference over other persons.”
16. In the light of aforesaid provision of law it was obligatory upon the respondent to give
the opportunity to the petitioner for reemployment in preference to other (fresh) workmen. Since,
there is violation of provisions of section 25-H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, therefore, the
termination of petitioner is not sustainable under law and liable to set aside. As far as the working
of 240 days in a calendar year is concerned, this provision is only relevant for the purpose of
section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and it is not necessary to a workman to complete 240
days during the preceding calendar year to take the benefit of section 25-H of Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947. Here, I am supported by the law laid down by Hon’ble High Court of H.P in the matter
of State of H.P and other Vs. Bhatag Ram and another reported in latest HLJ 2007 (H.P) 903.
17. Accordingly, for the aforesaid reasons, this issue is decided in favour of petitioner.
Issue No. 2.
18. For the reason recorded hereinabove while deciding issue No.1, the termination of
services of petitioner w.e.f. 21.1.2009 by the respondent is hereby set aside and as such the
petitioner is entitled to be reinstated in service with seniority and continuity. However, the
petitioner is not entitled to back wages as it is settled law that back wages cannot be granted
mechanically when the order of termination is declared illegal. Taking into account all the facts and
circumstances of the case, to my mind the petitioner is not entitled to back wages. Accordingly, this
issue is decided in favour of petitioner.
Relief
For the reasons recorded hereinabove, the claim petition is allowed and as such the
termination of services of petitioner from 21.1.2009 by the respondent is set aside and the petitioner
7584
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
is ordered to be reinstated in service forthwith with seniority and continuity but without back wages
and the reference is answered accordingly in favour of petitioner. Let a copy of this award be sent
to the appropriate government for publication in official gazette. File, after completion, be
consigned to records.
Announced in the open court today on this 27th day of February, 2013.
Presiding Judge,
Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Shimla.
___________
IN THE COURT OF PURENDER VAIDYA, PRESIDING JUDGE, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-
CUM-LABOUR COURT, SHIMLA, (H.P.)
Ref. No. 7 of 2010
Instituted on. 12.4.2010.
Decided on 27.2.2013.
Ganga Ram S/o Shri Kalu Ram C/o Shyam General Store, Deonghat, Solan, Opp. Solan
(HP) through J.C Bhardwaj, President HP AITUC, HQ Saproon, Solan, H.P.
..Petitioner.
Vs.
M/s Planet Infrastructure Pvt., Ltd., Planet Tower Baba Balak Nath Bhawan, Opp. New Bus
Stand, By Pass Solan, District Solan, H.P. through its Managing Director.
..Respondent.
Reference under section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
For petitioner : Shri J. C Bhardwaj, AR.
For respondent : Exparte.
AWARD
The following reference has been received from appropriate government for adjudication:
“Whether termination of services of Shri Ganga Ram Driver by the Managing Director M/s
Planet Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Plant Tower Baba Balak Nath Bhawan, Opposite New Bus
Stand, Bye- Pass Solan, Tehsil & District Solan, H.P from the post of Driver w.e.f.
20.1.2009 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is proper
and justified? If not, what relief of back wages, service benefits and amount of
compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to".
2. The petitioner filed the claim petition stating that he was employed as Tipper Driver in
the respondent company in the month of October, 2007. However, his services were orally and
illegally terminated without any notice by the respondent on 20.1.2009. At that time no
compensation in lieu of notice was paid to the petitioner. After the termination of petitioner, the
respondent employed new workmen. As such, the termination of petitioner was against the
provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Hence, the claim petition was filed with the prayer to
set aside the termination order. Petitioner further prayed for full back wages, seniority and other
consequential service benefits.
7585
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
3. The respondent contested the claim petition by filing a reply wherein preliminary
objections as to maintainability and cause of action were taken. On merits, respondent stated that
the petitioner was appointed as Tipper Driver in May, 2008 and he was never terminated. In fact,
petitioner left the job on his own and joined another company namely Rewal Variety Construction
Ltd., Rajgarh Road, Oachghat, District Solan w.e.f. 4.12.2008. So, there was no occasion for the
respondent to retrench the petitioner. The petitioner never remained in active roll of the respondent
and he himself left the job on 4.12.2008. The respondent also denied that thereafter new workmen
were employed. Consequently, respondent prayed for the dismissal of the claim petition.
4. Petitioner filed rejoinder wherein he denied all the averments made by the respondent
in reply and further reasserted the facts already stated by him in claim petition.
5. On the pleadings of the parties, the following issues were framed.
1. Whether the termination of services of Shri Ganga Ram by the Managing Director
M/s Planet Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Solan w.e.f. 20.1.2009 is in violation of the
provisions of Industrial Disputes Act?
..OPP.
2. If issue no.1 is proved in affirmative to what relief the petitioner is entitled to?
..OPP.
3. Relief.
6. The aforesaid issues were read over and explained to both the parties. No other issue
was pressed or claimed. Thereafter, the case was listed for the evidence of petitioner.
7. After recording the evidence of petitioner, the case was fixed for the evidence of
respondent. The respondent availed six opportunities to lead evidence and finally on 10.1.2013
none appeared on behalf of respondent, hence, respondent was proceeded against exparte.
8. I have heard exparte arguments of petitioner and gone through the record carefully.
9. For the reasons to be recorded hereinafter my findings on the aforesaid issues are as
under:
Issue No. 1
Yes.
Issue No. 2
Entitled for re-instatement with seniority and continuity but without back wages.
Relief.
Reference answered in negative per operative part of award.
Reasons for finding
Issue No. 1.
10. In view of arguments advanced on behalf of petitioner as well as evidence on record, I
am of the considered opinion that the termination of services of petitioner by the respondent w.e.f.
20.1.2009 is in violation of the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
11. The petitioner has alleged that he worked from October, 2007 to 20.1.2009 when he
was illegally terminated without any notice as required under section 25-F of Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947. For the same, petitioner was to establish that prior to 20.1.2009, he worked for 240 days
in a calendar year. If the petitioner could prove this fact only then the respondent was under the
7586
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
legal obligation to serve a notice of one month’s to the petitioner or to pay him compensation in
lieu of such notice.
12. The petitioner as PW-1 has made a general statement in his affidavit Ex. PA that he
worked for 240 days in a calendar year prior to his termination and he was not served notice under
section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, by the respondent. But his testimony was questioned by the
respondent during his cross-examination, so, the general statement of petitioner is not sufficient to
prove that in fact he worked for 240 days in the preceding calendar year when he was terminated
from service w.e.f. 20.1.2009.
13. The petitioner also produced in evidence mark X copy of log book of the vehicle
which he used to ply in order to show that he worked under the respondent. Although, mark X is a
photocopy and its original was not shown to the Court. Since this document was produced by the
petitioner, therefore, it can be looked into against the petitioner. If the contents of mark X are
admitted to be true then it is revealing that as Driver of the vehicle, the petitioner remained on duty
for 110 days from 1.1.2008 to 19.1.2009. So, the documentary evidence produced by the petitioner
is also not proving his plea that he worked for 240 days prior to his termination w.e.f. 20.1.2009.
As the result, there is no violation of section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
14. At the same time, the petitioner has also taken the plea that after his termination, the
respondent employed new workmen and violated the provisions of section 25-H of Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947. He has categorically deposed this fact in his testimony. The cross-examination
of petitioner is revealing that this fact is not disputed by the respondent as no cross-examination
was conducted on this fact. That means the testimony of petitioner goes un-rebutted that after his
termination respondent employed new workmen.
15. The respondent has taken the plea that petitioner has left the job on his own on
4.12.2008 and joined another company. But on behalf of respondent no evidence was led in any
manner whatsoever to prove said plea. Consequently, in the absence of any evidence on behalf of
respondent, it cannot be held that the petitioner left the job on his own and joined another company
on 4.12.2008. Therefore, we have to believe the testimony of petitioner that he was terminated
w.e.f 20.1.2009 and after his termination respondent employed junior workmen. Section 25-H of
Industrial Disputes Act, reads as follows:
“Re-employment of retrenched workmen.- Where any workmen are retrenched, and the
employer proposes to take into his employ any persons, he shall, in such manner as may be
prescribed, give an opportunity 2*[to the retrenched workmen who are citizens of India to
offer themselves for re-employment and such retrenched workman] who offer themselves
for re-employment shall have preference over other persons.”
16. In the light of aforesaid provision of law it was obligatory upon the respondent to give
the opportunity to the petitioner for reemployment in preference to other (fresh) workmen. Since,
there is violation of provisions of section 25-H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, therefore, the
termination of petitioner is not sustainable under law and liable to set aside. As far as the working
of 240 days in a calendar year is concerned, this provision is only relevant for the purpose of
section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and it is not necessary to a workman to complete 240
days during the preceding calendar year to take the benefit of section 25-H of Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947. Here, I am supported by the law laid down by Hon’ble High Court of H.P in the matter
of State of H.P and other Vs. Bhatag Ram and another reported in latest HLJ 2007 (H.P) 903.
17. Accordingly, for the aforesaid reasons, this issue is decided in favour of petitioner.
7587
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
Issue No. 2
18. For the reason recorded hereinabove while deciding issue No.1, the termination of
services of petitioner w.e.f. 20.1.2009 by the respondent is hereby set aside and as such the
petitioner is entitled to be reinstated in service with seniority and continuity. However, the
petitioner is not entitled to back wages as it is settled law that back wages cannot be granted
mechanically when the order of termination is declared illegal. Taking into account all the facts and
circumstances of the case, to my mind the petitioner is not entitled to back wages. Accordingly, this
issue is decided in favour of petitioner.
Relief
For the reasons recorded hereinabove, the claim petition is allowed and as such the
termination of services of petitioner from 20.1.2009 by the respondent is set aside and the petitioner
is ordered to be reinstated in service forthwith with seniority and continuity but without back wages
and the reference is answered accordingly in favour of petitioner. Let a copy of this award be sent
to the appropriate government for publication in official gazette. File, after completion, be
consigned to records.
Announced in the open court today on this 27th day of February, 2013.
Presiding Judge,
Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Shimla.
_________
IN THE COURT OF PURENDER VAIDYA, PRESIDING JUDGE, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-
CUM-LABOUR COURT, SHIMLA, (H.P.)
Ref. No. 47 of 2010
Instituted on. 22.4.2010.
Decided on 27.2.2013.
Karan Thakur S/o Shri Lal Singh C/o Shyam General Store, Deonghat, Solan, Opp. Solan
(HP) through J.C Bhardwaj, President HP AITUC, HQ Saproon, Solan, H.P.
..Petitioner.
Vs.
M/s Planet Infrastructure Pvt., Ltd., Planet Tower Baba Balak Nath Bhawan, Opp. New Bus
Stand, By Pass Solan, District Solan, H.P. through its Managing Director
..Respondent.
Reference under section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
For petitioner : Shri J. C Bhardwaj, AR.
For respondent : Exparte.
AWARD
The following reference has been received from appropriate government for adjudication:
“Whether termination of services of Shri Karan Thakur S/o Shri Lal Singh Driver by the
Managing Director M/s Planet Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Plant Tower Baba Balak Nath
7588
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
Bhawan, Opposite New Bus Stand, Bye- Pass Solan, Tehsil & District Solan, H.P from the
post of Driver w.e.f. 20.1.2009 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 is proper and justified? If not, what relief of back wages, service benefits and
amount of compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to.”
2. The petitioner filed the claim petition stating that he was employed as Tipper Driver in
the respondent company in the month of December, 2007. However, his services were orally and
illegally terminated without any notice by the respondent on 20.1.2009. At that time no
compensation in lieu of notice was paid to the petitioner. After the termination of petitioner, the
respondent employed new workmen. As such, the termination of petitioner was against the
provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Hence, the claim petition was filed with the prayer to
set aside the termination order. Petitioner further prayed for full back wages, seniority and other
consequential service benefits.
3. The respondent contested the claim petition by filing a reply wherein preliminary
objections as to maintainability and cause of action were taken. On merits, respondent stated that
the petitioner was appointed as Tipper Driver in May, 2008 and he was never terminated. In fact,
petitioner left the job on his own and joined another company namely Rewal Variety Construction
Ltd., Rajgarh Road, Oachghat, District Solan w.e.f. 4.12.2008. So, there was no occasion for the
respondent to retrench the petitioner. The petitioner never remained in active roll of the respondent
and he himself left the job on 4.12.2008. The respondent also denied that thereafter new workmen
were employed. Consequently, respondent prayed for the dismissal of the claim petition.
4. Petitioner filed rejoinder wherein he denied all the averments made by the respondent
in reply and further reasserted the facts already stated by him in claim petition.
5. On the pleadings of the parties, the following issues were framed.
1. Whether the termination of services of Shri Karan Thakur by the Managing
Director M/s Planet Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Solan w.e.f. 20.1.2009 is in violation
of the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act?
..OPP.
2. If issue no.1 is proved in affirmative to what relief the petitioner is entitled to?
..OPP.
3. Relief.
6. The aforesaid issues were read over and explained to both the parties. No other issue
was pressed or claimed. Thereafter, the case was listed for the evidence of petitioner.
7. After recording the evidence of petitioner, the case was fixed for the evidence of
respondent. The respondent availed six opportunities to lead evidence and finally on 10.1.2013
none appeared on behalf of respondent, hence, respondent was proceeded against exparte.
8. I have heard exparte arguments of petitioner and gone through the record carefully.
9. For the reasons to be recorded hereinafter my findings on the aforesaid issues are as
under:
Issue No. 1
Yes.
Issue No. 2
Entitled for re-instatement with seniority and continuity but without back
wages.
7589
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
Relief.
Reference answered in negative per operative part of award.
Reasons for finding
Issue No. 1.
10. In view of arguments advanced on behalf of petitioner as well as evidence on record, I
am of the considered opinion that the termination of services of petitioner by the respondent w.e.f.
20.1.2009 is in violation of the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
11. The petitioner has alleged that he worked from December, 2007 to 20.1.2009 when he
was illegally terminated without any notice as required under section 25-F of Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947. For the same, petitioner was to establish that prior to 20.1.2009, he worked for 240 days
in a calendar year. If the petitioner could prove this fact only then the respondent was under the
legal obligation to serve a notice of one month’s to the petitioner or to pay him compensation in
lieu of such notice.
12. The petitioner as PW-1 has made a general statement in his affidavit that he worked for
240 days in a calendar year prior to his termination and he was not served notice under section 25-F
of Industrial Disputes Act, by the respondent. But his testimony was questioned by the respondent
during his cross-examination, so, the general statement of petitioner is not sufficient to prove that in
fact he worked for 240 days in the preceding calendar year when he was terminated from service
w.e.f. 20.1.2009.
13. The petitioner also produced in evidence Ex. PA copy of log book of the vehicle which
he used to ply in order to show that he worked under the respondent. Although, Ex. PA is a
photocopy and its original was not shown to the Court. Since this document was produced by the
petitioner, therefore, it can be looked into against the petitioner. If the contents of Ex. PA are
admitted to be true then it is revealing that as Driver of the vehicle, the petitioner remained on duty
for 123 days from 1.1.2008 to 19.1.2009. So, the documentary evidence produced by the petitioner
is also not proving his plea that he worked for 240 days prior to his termination w.e.f. 20.1.2009.
As the result, there is no violation of section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
14. At the same time, the petitioner has also taken the plea that after his termination, the
respondent employed new workmen and violated the provisions of section 25-H of Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947. He has categorically deposed this fact in his testimony. The cross-examination
of petitioner is revealing that this fact is not disputed by the respondent as no cross-examination
was conducted on this fact. That means the testimony of petitioner goes un-rebutted that after his
termination respondent employed new workmen.
15. The respondent has taken the plea that petitioner has left the job on his own on
4.12.2008 and joined another company. But on behalf of respondent no evidence was led in any
manner whatsoever to prove said plea. Consequently, in the absence of any evidence on behalf of
respondent, it cannot be held that the petitioner left the job on his own and joined another company
on 4.12.2008. Therefore, we have to believe the testimony of petitioner that he was terminated
w.e.f 20.1.2009 and after his termination respondent employed junior workmen. Section 25-H of
Industrial Disputes Act, reads as follows:
“Re-employment of retrenched workmen.- Where any workmen are retrenched, and the
employer proposes to take into his employ any persons, he shall, in such manner as may be
prescribed, give an opportunity 2*[to the retrenched workmen who are citizens of India to
offer themselves for re-employment and such retrenched workman] who offer themselves
for re-employment shall have preference over other persons.”
7590
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
16. In the light of aforesaid provision of law it was obligatory upon the respondent to give
the opportunity to the petitioner for reemployment in preference to other (fresh) workmen. Since,
there is violation of provisions of section 25-H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, therefore, the
termination of petitioner is not sustainable under law and liable to set aside. As far as the working
of 240 days in a calendar year is concerned, this provision is only relevant for the purpose of
section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and it is not necessary to a workman to complete 240
days during the preceding calendar year to take the benefit of section 25-H of Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947. Here, I am supported by the law laid down by Hon’ble High Court of H.P in the matter
of State of H.P and other Vs. Bhatag Ram and another reported in latest HLJ 2007 (H.P) 903.
17. Accordingly, for the aforesaid reasons, this issue is decided in favour of petitioner.
Issue No. 2.
18. For the reason recorded hereinabove while deciding issue no.1, the termination of
services of petitioner w.e.f. 20.1.2009 by the respondent is hereby set aside and as such the
petitioner is entitled to be reinstated in service with seniority and continuity. However, the
petitioner is not entitled to back wages as it is settled law that back wages cannot be granted
mechanically when the order of termination is declared illegal. Taking into account all the facts and
circumstances of the case, to my mind the petitioner is not entitled to back wages. Accordingly, this
issue is decided in favour of petitioner.
Relief
For the reasons recorded hereinabove, the claim petition is allowed and as such the
termination of services of petitioner from 20.1.2009 by the respondent is set aside and the petitioner
is ordered to be reinstated in service forthwith with seniority and continuity but without back wages
and the reference is answered accordingly in favour of petitioner. Let a copy of this award be sent
to the appropriate government for publication in official gazette. File, after completion, be
consigned to records.
Announced in the open court today on this 27th day of February, 2013.
Presiding Judge,
Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Shimla.
_________
IN THE COURT OF PURENDER VAIDYA, PRESIDING JUDGE, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-
CUM-LABOUR COURT, SHIMLA, (H.P.)
Ref. No. 10 of 2010
Instituted on. 12.4.2010.
Decided on 28.2.2013.
Narender Singh S/o Shri Bhagat Ram R/o Village Sarahan, P.O Banethi, Tehsil Nahan,
District Sirmour, H.P.
..Petitioner.
Vs.
1. The Collector of Forest Settlement Solan and Sirmour at Nahan, District Sirmour, H.P.
7591
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
2. The Assistant Conservator of Forest, Forest Settlement Solan and Sirmour at Nahan,
District Sirmour, H.P.
. . Respondents.
Reference under section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
For petitioner : Shri R.K Khidta, Advocate.
For respondent : Shri Jagdish Kanwar, Dy. DA.
AWARD
The following reference has been received from appropriate government for adjudication:
“Whether the termination of the services of Shri Narender Singh S/o Shri Bhagat Ram by i)
The Collector, Forest Settlement Solan and Sirmour at Nahan District Sirmour, H.P. ii) The
Assistant Conservator of Forest Settlement Solan & Sirmour at Nahan District Sirmour, H.P
w.e.f. 13.10.2008 where as his juniors have been kept in service is legal and justified? If
not, what relief of service benefits the above workman is entitled to?”
2. The petitioner filed the claim petition stating that he was engaged by the respondent in
Forest Beat Banethi under Jamta Forest Range in November, 1999 and petitioner worked till
30.6.2008. The services of petitioner were wrongly and illegally terminated orally by the
respondent in July, 2008. However, the date of termination of petitioner has been wrongly shown in
reference as 13.10.2008. No notice was served upon the petitioner before his termination and
further the respondent did not follow the principle of last come first go as junior workmen to the
petitioner were still working with the respondent, hence, the termination of petitioner was illegal.
Consequently, petitioner filed the claim petition challenging his termination and he further prayed
that he be reinstated in service with all consequential benefits.
3. The respondents contested the claim petition by filing a reply wherein preliminary
objection as to maintainability was taken. The respondent also stated that the petitioner was
engaged in seasonal forestry work on daily wages and in fact the petitioner did not complete 240
days in a calendar year prior to his termination. At the end of every season, the services of
petitioner were not required, so, there was no termination or retrenchment of the petitioner. All the
labourers were engaged in accordance with seniority.
On merits, the respondent stated that the petitioner was engaged on 6.3.2000. The services
of petitioner were never terminated but he was still working with the respondent department. In
fact, the petitioner remained absent from work and whenever he reported to the work, he was
engaged. The engagement and disengagement of the workers was done as per the principle of last
come first go. No juniors to the petitioner were retained. Consequently, respondent prayed for the
dismissal of the claim petition.
4. No rejoinder was filed. On the pleadings of the parties, the following issues were
framed.
1. Whether the termination of the petitioner by the respondents with effect from
13.10.2008 is in violation of the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ?
..OPP.
2. If issue No.1 is proved in affirmative to what relief the petitioner is entitled to?
..OPP.
3. Relief.
7592
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
5. The aforesaid issues were read over and explained to both the parties. No other issue
was pressed or claimed. Evidence of both the parties on the aforesaid issues were recorded.
6. I have heard both the parties and gone through the record carefully.
7. For the reasons to be recorded hereinafter my findings on the aforesaid issues are as
under:
Issue No. 1 Yes.
Issue No. 2 Entitled for seniority and continuity but without back wages.
Relief.
Reference answered in negative per operative part of award.
Reasons for finding
Issue No.1.
8. From the pleadings as well as evidence of both the parties, it is undisputed that the
petitioner worked with the respondent as daily wager and he was earlier disengaged by the
respondent in 2008. It is also undisputed fact that now the respondents has engaged the petitioner
on 17.8.2009.
9. The petitioner Narender Singh stepped into the witness box as PW-1 and he has
categorically deposed all the facts stated by him in his claim petition. He has stated that he was
terminated w.e.f 1.7.2008 without following any procedure and he was reengaged w.e.f. 17.8.2009.
When he was disengaged, he raised demand notice Ex. PW-1/B.
10. On behalf of respondents RW-1 Shri Sunil kumar Dy. Ranger was examined. His
testimony is revealing that the petitioner has been working with the department since 6.3.2000.
However, in the crossexamination of petitioner, respondent has admitted that petitioner was
reengaged on 17.8.2009. The witness of respondent also tendered in evidence the mandays chart of
the petitioner Ex. RW-1/A. This mandays chart is specific evidence to reveal that the petitioner was
terminated on 1.7.2008 and prior to his termination he worked for more than 240 days in a calendar
year.
11. Since, petitioner worked for more than 240 days in a calendar year prior to his
termination w.e.f. 1.7.2008, therefore, the respondent was under the legal obligation as per
provisions of section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to serve one month’s notice upon the
petitioner or to pay one month’s wages and compensation to the petitioner in lieu of said notice.
But no such steps were taken by the respondent before terminating the petitioner. Here, the cross-
examination of RW-1 Sunil Kumar is relevant wherein he has admitted that department had not
served any notice or paid any compensation to the petitioner on 1.7.2008 when his services were
terminated. Consequently, the termination of petitioner is illegal and liable to set aside.
12. The petitioner has also alleged that the respondent violated the principle of first come
last go. In his testimony he has categorically deposed that junior workers to him were retained by
the respondent after terminating him in 2008. RW-1 Sunil Kumar in his crossexamination, has
admitted that the junior workers to petitioner were still in service. Here section 25-G of Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 is relevant whichsays that whenever any workman is to be retrenched, the
employer shall ordinarily retrench the workman who was the last person to be employed.
Therefore, if any retrenchment was made in July, 2008, the respondent could have retrenched the
junior workman to the petitioner who was retained by the respondents. Therefore, there is clear
7593
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
violation of section 25-G of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. On this score also the termination of
petitioner w.e.f. 1st July, 2008 is not sustainable.
13. Although, in the reference the date of termination of petitioner has been stated to be
from 13.10.2008. However, for the reasons discussed hereinabove, it stands established the
petitioner was terminated w.e.f. 1.7.2008. So, the termination of petitioner w.e.f. 1.7.2008 is hereby
declared illegal and is accordingly set aside.
14. Consequently, for the aforesaid reasons, this issue is decided in favour of petitioner.
Issue No. 2
15. For the reason recorded hereinabove while discussing issue no.1, the termination of
services of petitioner w.e.f. 1.7.2008 by the respondents is hereby set aside. As discussed
hereinabove, it stands established that the respondent has re-employed the petitioner from
17.8.2009 and now the petitioner is working with the respondent. However, the period w.e.f.
1.7.2008 to 16.8.2009 cannot be treated as break in service and the petitioner would be deemed to
in service during this period as such the petitioner is entitled for seniority and continuity in service.
However, the petitioner is not entitled to back wages as it is settled law that back wages cannot be
granted mechanically when the order of termination is declared illegal. Taking into account all the
facts and circumstances of the case, to my mind the petitioner is not entitled to back wages.
Accordingly, this issue is decided in favour of petitioner.
Relief
For the reasons recorded hereinabove, the claim petition is allowed and as such the
termination of services of petitioner from 1.7.2008 by the respondents is set aside. Since, the
petitioner has been re-engaged, therefore, he is entitled to the seniority and continuity w.e.f.
1.7.2008 to 16.8.2009. This period shall be counted for the purpose of seniority and continuity of
the petitioner and as such the reference is answered accordingly in favour of petitioner. Let a copy
of this award be sent to the appropriate government for publication in official gazette. File, after
completion, be consigned to records.
Announced in the open court today on this 28th day of February, 2013.
Presiding Judge,
Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Shimla.
__________
IN THE COURT OF PURENDER VAIDYA, PRESIDING JUDGE, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-
CUM-LABOUR COURT, SHIMLA, (H.P) CAMP AT NALAGARH
Ref No. 45 of 2012
Instituted on. 28.6.2012.
Decided on 14.02.2013.
Gurmukh Suingh S/o Shri Jagat Singh R/o Village Haripur Sandholi, Baddi District Solan
H.P.
. .Petitioner.
Vs.
The Managing Director M/s Deepak Spinners Ltd., Industrial Area Baddi, District Solan,
H.P.
. . Respondent.
7594
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
Reference under section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
For petitioner : None.
For respondent : Shri Rajeev Sharma, Advocate.
AWARD
The following reference has been received from appropriate government for adjudication:
“Whether termination of services of Shri Gurmukh Singh S/o Shri Jagat Singh R/o
Village Haripur Sandholi, Baddi District Solan HP as Senior Fitter by the Managing
Director M/s Deepak Spinners Ltd., Industrial Area Baddi, District Solan, H.P w.e.f.
8.7.2010 after conducting an exparte enquiry is legal and justified? If not, what
amount of back wages, past service benefits, seniority and compensation the above
worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
2. The reference was received in respect of termination of services of Gurmukh Singh
petitioner. Petitioner appeared before this Court and prayed for adjournment to file the claim
petitioner which was allowed. Thereafter, neither petitioner nor any person on his behalf appeared
and failed to file any claim despite sufficient opportunities which goes to show that the petitioner is
not interested to pursue this reference. Accordingly, the reference is answered in negative and as
such the petitioner is not entitled to any relief from this Court. Let a copy of this award be sent to
the appropriate government for publication in the official gazette. File, after completion be
consigned to records.
Announced:
14/2/2013.
Presiding Judge,
Labour Court Shimla.
Camp at Nalagarh.
__________
Ref.49/2010
Sh. Hari krishan V/s Propriter, M/s Hotel Himachal Shimla.
21.2.2013.
Present:
Petitioner with Shri Niranjan Verma, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri Rahul Mahajan, Advocate for respondent.
Today, petitioner stated that the matter has been amicably compromised, so, he did not want
to press the present reference. To this effect, statement of petitioner recorded. He also tendered in
evidence memorandum of settlement which is exhibited by this Court as Ex. C-1 which is signed
by both the parties. In view of this statement of petitioner, the present reference stands decided and
award is also passed accordingly. The memorandum of settlement Ex. C-1 shall form part of the
award. Let a copy of this award be sent to the appropriate government for publication in official
gazette. File, after completion be consigned to records.
Announced:
21/2/2013.
Presiding Judge,
Labour Court, Shimla.
7595
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
Ref.51/2010
Sh. Ramesh Kumar& others V/s Propriter, M/s Hotel Himachal Shimla
21.2.2013.
Present:
Petitioner with Shri Niranjan Verma, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri Rahul Mahajan, Advocate for respondent.
Today, petitioner stated that the matter has been amicably compromised, so, he did not want
to press the present reference. To this effect, statement of petitioner recorded. He also tendered in
evidence memorandum of settlement which is exhibited by this Court as Ex. C-1 which is signed
by both the parties. In view of this statement of petitioner, the present reference stands decided and
award is also passed accordingly. The memorandum of settlement Ex. C-1 shall form part of the
award. Let a copy of this award be sent to the appropriate government for publication in official
gazette. File, after completion be consigned to records.
Announced:
21/2/2013.
Presiding Judge,
Labour Court, Shimla.
________
IN THE COURT OF PURENDER VAIDYA, PRESIDING JUDGE, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-
CUM-LABOUR COURT, SHIMLA, (H.P.)
Ref. No. 9 of 2010
Instituted on. 12.4.2010.
Decided on 28.2.2013.
Satveer Singh S/o Shri Himat Singh R/o Village Sarahan, P.O Banethi, Tehsil Nahan,
District Sirmour, H.P.
. . Petitioner.
Vs.
3. The Collector of Forest Settlement Solan and Sirmour at Nahan, District Sirmour, H.P.
4. The Assistant Conservator of Forest, Forest Settlement Solan and Sirmour at Nahan,
District Sirmour, H.P.
. . Respondents.
Reference under section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
For petitioner : Shri R.K Khidta, Advocate.
For respondent : Shri Jagdish Kanwar, Dy. DA.
AWARD
The following reference has been received from appropriate government for adjudication:
“Whether the termination of the services of Shri Narender Singh S/o Shri Bhagat Ram by i)
The Collector, Forest Settlement Solan and Sirmour at Nahan District Sirmour, H.P. ii) The
Assistant Conservator of Forest Settlement Solan & Sirmour at Nahan District Sirmour, H.P
7596
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
w.e.f. 13.10.2008 where as his juniors have been kept in service is legal and justified? If
not, what relief of service benefits the above workman is entitled to?”
2. The petitioner filed the claim petition stating that he was engaged by the respondent in
Forest Beat Banethi under Jamta Forest Range in November, 1999 and petitioner worked till
30.6.2008. The services of petitioner were wrongly and illegally terminated orally by the
respondent in July, 2008. However, the date of termination of petitioner has been wrongly shown in
reference as 13.10.2008. No notice was served upon the petitioner before his termination and
further the respondent did not follow the principle of last come first go as junior workmen to the
petitioner were still working with the respondent, hence, the termination of petitioner was illegal.
Consequently, petitioner filed the claim petition challenging his termination and he further prayed
that he be reinstated in service with all consequential benefits.
3. The respondents contested the claim petition by filing a reply wherein preliminary
objection as to maintainability was taken. The respondent also stated that the petitioner was
engaged in seasonal forestry work on daily wages and in fact the petitioner did not complete 240
days in a calendar year prior to his termination. At the end of every season, the services of
petitioner were not required, so, there was no termination or retrenchment of the petitioner. All the
labourers were engaged in accordance with seniority.
On merits, the respondent stated that the petitioner was engaged on 6.3.2000. The services
of petitioner were never terminated but he was still working with the respondent department. In
fact, the petitioner remained absent from work and whenever he reported to the work, he was
engaged. The engagement and disengagement of the workers was done as per the principle of last
come first go. No juniors to the petitioner were retained. Consequently, respondent prayed for the
dismissal of the claim petition.
4. No rejoinder was filed. On the pleadings of the parties, the following issues were
framed.
1. Whether the termination of the petitioner by the respondents with effect from
13.10.2008 is in violation of the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ?
..OPP.
2. If issue no.1 is proved in affirmative to what relief the petitioner is entitled to?
..OPP.
3.
Relief.
5. The aforesaid issues were read over and explained to both the parties. No other issue
was pressed or claimed. Evidence of both the parties on the aforesaid issues were recorded.
6. I have heard both the parties and gone through the record carefully.
7. For the reasons to be recorded hereinafter my findings on the aforesaid issues are as
under:
Issue No. 1 Yes.
Issue No. 2 Entitled for seniority and continuity but without back wages.
Relief.
Reference answered in negative per operative part of award.
7597
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
Reasons for finding
Issue No. 1.
8. From the pleadings as well as evidence of both the parties, it is undisputed that the
petitioner worked with the respondent as daily wager and he was earlier disengaged by the
respondent in 2008. It is also undisputed fact that now the respondents has engaged the petitioner
on 17.8.2009.
9. The petitioner Narender Singh stepped into the witness box as PW-1 and he has
categorically deposed all the facts stated by him in his claim petition. He has stated that he was
terminated w.e.f 1.7.2008 without following any procedure and he was reengaged w.e.f. 17.8.2009.
When he was disengaged, he raised demand notice Ex. PW-1/B.
10. On behalf of respondents RW-1 Shri Sunil kumar Dy. Ranger was examined. His
testimony is revealing that the petitioner has been working with the department since 6.3.2000.
However, in the crossexamination of petitioner, respondent has admitted that petitioner was
reengaged on 17.8.2009. The witness of respondent also tendered in evidence the mandays chart of
the petitioner Ex. RW-1/A. This mandays chart is specific evidence to reveal that the petitioner was
terminated on 1.7.2008 and prior to his termination he worked for more than 240 days in a calendar
year.
11. Since, petitioner worked for more than 240 days in a calendar year prior to his
termination w.e.f. 1.7.2008, therefore, the respondent was under the legal obligation as per
provisions of section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to serve one month’s notice upon the
petitioner or to pay one month’s wages and compensation to the petitioner in lieu of said notice.
But no such steps were taken by the respondent before terminating the petitioner. Here, the cross-
examination of RW-1 Sunil Kumar is relevant wherein he has admitted that department had not
served any notice or paid any compensation to the petitioner on 1.7.2008 when his services were
terminated. Consequently, the termination of petitioner is illegal and liable to set aside.
12. The petitioner has also alleged that the respondent violated the principle of first come
last go. In his testimony he has categorically deposed that junior workers to him were retained by
the respondent after terminating him in 2008. RW-1 Sunil Kumar in his crossexamination, has
admitted that the junior workers to petitioner were still in service. Here section 25-G of Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 is relevant which says that whenever any workman is to be retrenched, the
employer shall ordinarily retrench the workman who was the last person to be employed.
Therefore, if any retrenchment was made in July, 2008, the respondent could have retrenched the
junior workman to the petitioner who was retained by the respondents. Therefore, there is clear
violation of section 25-G of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. On this score also the termination of
petitioner w.e.f. 1st July, 2008 is not sustainable.
13. Although, in the reference the date of termination of petitioner has been stated to be
from 13.10.2008. However, for the reasons discussed hereinabove, it stands established the
petitioner was terminated w.e.f. 1.7.2008. So, the termination of petitioner w.e.f. 1.7.2008 is hereby
declared illegal and is accordingly set aside.
14. Consequently, for the aforesaid reasons, this issue is decided in favour of petitioner.
Issue No. 2.
15. For the reason recorded hereinabove while discussing issue no.1, the termination of
services of petitioner w.e.f. 1.7.2008 by the respondents is hereby set aside. As discussed
7598
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
hereinabove, it stands established that the respondent has re-employed the petitioner from
17.8.2009 and now the petitioner is working with the respondent. However, the period w.e.f.
1.7.2008 to 16.8.2009 cannot be treated as break in service and the petitioner would be deemed to
in service during this period as such the petitioner is entitled for seniority and continuity in service.
However, the petitioner is not entitled to back wages as it is settled law that back wages cannot be
granted mechanically when the order of termination is declared illegal. Taking into account all the
facts and circumstances of the case, to my mind the petitioner is not entitled to back wages.
Accordingly, this issue is decided in favour of petitioner.
Relief
For the reasons recorded hereinabove, the claim petition is allowed and as such the
termination of services of petitioner from 1.7.2008 by the respondents is set aside. Since, the
petitioner has been re-engaged, therefore, he is entitled to the seniority and continuity w.e.f.
1.7.2008 to 16.8.2009. This period shall be counted for the purpose of seniority and continuity of
the petitioner and as such the reference is answered accordingly in favour of petitioner. Let a copy
of this award be sent to the appropriate government for publication in official gazette. File, after
completion, be consigned to records.
Announced in the open court today on this 28th day of February, 2013.
Presiding Judge,
Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Shimla.
_______
IN THE COURT OF PURENDER VAIDYA, PRESIDING JUDGE, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-
CUM-LABOUR COURT, SHIMLA, (H.P.)
Ref. No. 102 of 2010
Instituted on. 23.8.2010.
Decided on 28.2.2013.
Sita Ram S/o Shru Junia Ram R/o Village Board, P.O Koti Bounch, Tehsil Shillai, District
Sirmour, H.P.
. . Petitioner.
Vs.
1. The Princiipal Chief Conservator of Forest, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla H.P.
2. Divisional Forest Officer. Forest Division Renukaji, Tehsil Renuka, District Sirmour,
H.P.
3. Range Officer, Forest Range, Shillai, Tehsil Shillai, District Sirmour, H.P.
..Respondents.
Reference under section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
For petitioner : Shri R.R. Rahi, Advocate.
For respondent : Shri Jagdish Kanwar, Dy. DA.
7599
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
AWARD
The following reference has been received from appropriate government for adjudication:
“Whether the termination of the services of Shri Sita Ram S/o Shri Jhunia Ram by the
Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division, Renukaji, District Sirmour, H.P w.e.f. 1.4.2009
without complying the provisions of the section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
and giving fictional breaks is legal and justified? If not, what relief of service benefits and
compensation the above workman is entitled to?”
2. The petitioner filed the claim petition stating that he was engaged by the respondent on
1.7.1999 in Forest Beat Khalando under Shillai Forest Range, District Sirmour, H.P. The petitioner
worked continuously without any break for more than 240 days in each calendar year. However, his
services were terminated earlier on 1.8.2000. The petitioner filed an OA before State
Administrative Tribunal, Shimla wherein interim order was passed in favour of petitioner directing
the respondent to re-engage him. However, vide order dated 11.1.2006, the State Administrative
Tribunal dismissed the O.A of petitioner for want of jurisdiction. The petitioner was subsequently
reengaged by the respondent and again retrenched w.e.f. 1.4.2009 without complying the
provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The petitioner worked for more than 240 days in a
calendar year prior to his termination. The petitioner further stated that after his termination,
respondent retained junior persons namely Sita Ram, Bir Singh, Hari Singh and Mangat Ram. So,
the respondent did not followed the principle of first come last go. Consequently, petitioner
challenged his termination w.e.f. 1.4.2009 and prayed that he be reinstated with all consequential
benefits.
3. The respondents contested the claim petition by filing a reply wherein it was stated that
the petitioner was only engaged for seasonal forestry work and he was a casual workman. The
petitioner never completed 240 days in a calendar year prior to his termination. It was only in 2005
when he completed 242 days. Respondents did not dispute the O.A filed by the petitioner before
State Administrative Tribunal, Shimla. Respondent stated that the policy of first come last go was
never violated and no juniors to the petitioner were retained after the termination of petitioner.
Consequently, respondent prayed for the dismissal of the claim petition.
4. Petitioner filed rejoinder wherein he denied all the averments made by the respondent
in reply and further reasserted the facts already stated by him in claim petition.
5. On the pleadings of the parties, the following issues were framed.
1. Whether the termination of services of petitioner by the respondent with effect
from 1.4.2009 is in violation of the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ?
..OPP.
2. If issue no.1 is proved in affirmative to what relief the petitioner is entitled to?
..OPP.
3. Relief.
6. The aforesaid issues were read over and explained to both the parties. No other issue
was pressed or claimed. Evidence of both the parties on the aforesaid issues were recorded.
7. I have heard both the parties and gone through the record carefully.
8. For the reasons to be recorded hereinafter my findings on the aforesaid issues are as
under:
7600
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
Issue No. 1
Yes.
Issue No. 2
Entitled for re-instatement with seniority and continuity but without back wages.
Relief.
Reference answered in negative per operative part of award.
Reasons for finding
Issue No. 1.
9. After hearing both the parties and going through the record carefully, I am of the
considered opinion that the termination of services of petitioner w.e.f. 1.4.2009 is against the
provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and liable to set aside.
10. From the pleadings as well as evidence of the parties there is no dispute that petitioner
was dismissed earlier in 2000. For the same, he had filed OA No. 3353/2000 before the then State
Administrative Tribunal, Shimla and vide order dated 1.6.2001 Ex. PX, the Tribunal had ordered
the respondent to reengage the petitioner. However, the OA of petitioner was finally dismissed for
want of jurisdiction by Administrative Tribunal vide copy of order Ex. PY dated 11.1.2006. It is
also undisputed that subsequently the petitioner was reengaged and again terminated w.e.f.
1.4.2009.
11. The petitioner has stepped into the witness box as PW-1 and he has stated that prior to
his termination he worked for more than 240 days and before terminating him no notice was served
upon him as required under section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
12. On behalf of respondents RW-1 Vijay Pal, Deputy Ranger, Shillai was examined and
he has stated that the petitioner did not work for 240 days in a calendar year prior to his termination
and in the year of 2009, the petitioner himself had abandoned the job. On behalf of respondent, the
mandays chart of petitioner Ex. R-1 was also filed which is revealing that prior to 1.4.2009 the
petitioner did not complete 240 days in a calendar year. So, there is no legal obligation for the
respondent to serve a notice under section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Hence, there is no
violation of section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
13. However, at the same time, the petitioner has alleged that after his termination junior
workmen namely Sita Ram, Bir Singh, Hari Singh and Mangat Ram were retained by the
respondent in Shillai range. Although, the witness of respondent RW-1 has stated that no juniors to
the petitioner were retained and there is no violation of principal of first come last go by the
respondent. But para 22 of the reply of respondent is relevant wherein respondent has stated that
the petitioner was irresponsible and his attitude was negligent and he abstained himself from work.
As such juniors to him continued working as daily waged workers. This is a specific and clear
admission on the part of the respondent. If the petitioner was irregular and remained absent from
work, the respondent could have easily issued a show cause notice to him to join the duties but no
show cause notice was issued to the petitioner. Thus, it is clear that junior workmen to petitioner
were retained by the respondent after his termination. So, taking into consideration the testimony of
petitioner as well as para 22 of reply of respondent, I am satisfied that respondent has violated the
principles of first come last go and section 25-G of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 which says
whenever any workman is to be retrenched, the employer shall ordinarily retrench the workman
who was the last person to be employed. Therefore, if any retrenchment was made in April, 2009,
the respondent could have retrenched the junior workman to the petitioner who was retained by the
respondent. Therefore, there is clear violation of section 25-G of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Consequently, for the aforesaid reasons, the termination of petitioner w.e.f. 1.4.2009 is not
sustainable under law and is hereby set aside. Hence, issue no.1 is decided in favour of petitioner.
7601
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
Issue No. 2
14. For the reason recorded hereinabove while deciding issue No.1, the termination of
services of petitioner w.e.f. 1.4.2009 by the respondents is hereby set aside and as such the
petitioner is entitled to be reinstated in service with seniority and continuity. However, the
petitioner is not entitled to back wages as it is settled law that back wages cannot be granted
mechanically when the order of termination is declared illegal. Taking into account all the facts and
circumstances of the case, to my mind the petitioner is not entitled to back wages. Accordingly, this
issue is decided in favour of petitioner.
Relief
For the reasons recorded hereinabove, the claim petition is allowed and as such the
termination of services of petitioner from 1.4.2009 by the respondents is set aside and the petitioner
is ordered to be reinstated in service forthwith with seniority and continuity but without back wages
and the reference is answered accordingly in favour of petitioner. Let a copy of this award be sent
to the appropriate government for publication in official gazette. File, after completion, be
consigned to records.
Announced in the open court today on this 28th day of February, 2013.
Presiding Judge,
Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Shimla.
_________
c vnkyr dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh ¼uk0 rg0½] rglhy gjksyh] ftyk Åuk] fgekpy izns'k
gjuke nkl iq= Jh lUr cuke
vke turk
vkosnu&i= v/khu /kkjk 13 ¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q jftLVªhdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969-
Jh gjuke nkl iq= Jh lUr] oklh ikydokg us bl U;k;ky; esa fuosnu fd;k gS fd mlds HkkbZ
Jh Hkxrw dh e`R;q fnukad 29&12&1997 dks gqbZ Fkh ysfdu mudh e`R;q frfFk xzke iapk;r vfHkys[k esa ntZ
ugha gSA
vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj ds ek/;e ls lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn bl ckjs fdlh O;fDr
dks dksbZ mtj ;k ,rjkt gks rks og fnukad 30&3&2013 dks izkr% 10-00 cts v/kksgLrk{kjh ds U;k;ky; esa
mifLFkr gksdj is'k dj ldrk gSA
;fn mijksDr of.kZr frfFk dks fdlh Hkh O;fDr dk dksbZ mtj ;k ,rjkt bl U;k;ky; esa izkIr
ugha gksrk gS rks bl U;k;ky; esa izkIr cgh }kjk e`R;q frfFk ntZ djus gsrq xzke iapk;r ikydokg dks
vkns'k ns fn, tk,axsA
vkt fnukad 4&3&2013 dks esjs gLrk{kj ,oa U;k;ky; eksgj ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA gLrk{kfjr@&
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh ¼uk0 rg0½]
gjksyh] ftyk Åuk] fgekpy izns'kA
7602
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 28 ekpZ] 2013@7 pS=] 1934
c vnkyr dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh ¼uk0 rg0½] rglhy gjksyh] ftyk Åuk] fgekpy izns'k
Jh lwje flag iq= Jh djrkj pUn cuke
vke turk
vkosnu&i= v/khu /kkjk 13 ¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q jftLVªhdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969-
Jh lwje flag iq= Jh djrkj pUn] oklh HkfMikjk nqySgM+ us bl U;k;ky; esa fuosnu fd;k gS fd
mldh ekrk Jherh ljouh nsoh dh e`R;q fnukad 19&11&2010 dks gqbZ Fkh ysfdu mudh e`R;q frfFk xzke
iapk;r vfHkys[k esa ntZ ugha gSA
vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj ds ek/;e ls lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn bl ckjs fdlh O;fDr
dks dksbZ mtj ;k ,rjkt gks rks og fnukad 4&4&2013 dks izkr% 10-00 cts v/kksgLrk{kjh ds U;k;ky; esa
mifLFkr gksdj is'k dj ldrk gSA
;fn mijksDr of.kZr frfFk dks fdlh Hkh O;fDr dk dksbZ mtj ;k ,rjkt bl U;k;ky; esa izkIr
ugha gksrk gS rks bl U;k;ky; esa izkIr cgh }kjk e`R;q frfFk ntZ djus gsrq xzke iapk;r HkfMikjk nqySgM dks
vkns'k ns fn, tk,axsA
vkt fnukad 4&3&2013 dks esjs gLrk{kj ,oa U;k;ky; eksgj ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA gLrk{kfjr@&
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh ¼uk0 rg0½]
gjksyh] ftyk Åuk] fgekpy izns'kA
&&&&&&
c vnkyr dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh ¼uk0 rg0½] rglhy gjksyh] ftyk Åuk] fgekpy izns'k
Jh peu yky iq= Jh Hkxr jke cuke
vke turk
vkosnu&i= v/khu /kkjk 13 ¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q jftLVªhdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969-
Jh peu yky iq= Jh Hkxr jke] oklh xksUniqj owyk us bl U;k;ky; esa fuosnu fd;k gS fd mlds
iq= o#.k dqekj dk tUe fnukad 24&2&1991 dks gqvk gS ysfdu mldh tUe frfFk xzke iapk;r vfHkys[k
esa ntZ ugha gSA
vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj ds ek/;e ls lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn bl ckjs fdlh O;fDr
dks dksbZ mtj ;k ,rjkt gks rks og fnukad 4&4&2013 dks izkr% 10-00 cts v/kksgLrk{kjh ds U;k;ky; esa
mifLFkr gksdj is'k dj ldrk gSA
;fn mijksDr of.kZr frfFk dks fdlh Hkh O;fDr dk dksbZ mtj ;k ,rjkt bl U;k;ky; esa izkIr
ugha gksrk gS rks bl U;k;ky; esa izkIr cgh }kjk tUe frfFk ntZ djus gsrq xzke iapk;r xksUniqj owyk dks
vkns'k ns fn, tk,axsA
vkt fnukad 4&3&2013 dks esjs gLrk{kj ,oa U;k;ky; eksgj ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA gLrk{kfjr@&
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh ¼uk0 rg0½]
gjksyh] ftyk Åuk] fgekpy izns'kA
fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr