jkti=] fgekpy izns'k
fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr
cq/kokj] 7 twu] 2017@17 T;s"B] 1939
fgekpy izns'k ljdkj
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 24th November, 2016
No.11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Hanif S/O Shri Roj Deen, R/O Village
Nihad, P.O. Aund, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated nil
received in Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 13-06-2011 regarding his illegal termination
49&jkti=@2017&07&06&2017
¼1999½
2000
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 7 twu] 2017@17 T;s"B] 1939
from the services by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra,
H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.The Labour
Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the
industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation
proceedings, where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kangra at
Dharamshala was considered, examined and the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of 21 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated
31-08-2013;
And whereas Shri Hanif S/O Shri Roj Deen agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 496/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the CWP on dated 19-03-2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the
petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by the Hon’ble High
Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh State
Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as follows:-
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated
15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial
Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for
legal adjudication:—
“Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Hanif S/O Shri Roj Deen, R/O Village
Nihad, P.O. Aund, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990 by (i) the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily
wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after about 21 years vide demand
notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 13-06-2011,
without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and
justified? If not, keeping in view delay of about 21 years in raising the industrial dispute,
what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-
worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
2001
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 7 twu] 2017@17 T;s"B] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 15th November, 2016
No.11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Harbans Singh S/O Shri Bhag Singh,
R/O Village Danna, P.O. Khawara, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated nil received in Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 13-06-2012 regarding his
illegal termination from the services by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur,
District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra,
H.P.The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to
settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of
conciliation proceedings, where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kangra at
Dharamshala was considered, examined and the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh
as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of about 22 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated
04-04-2015;
And whereas Shri Harbans Singh S/O Shri Bhag Singh agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 1249/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the CWP on dated 15-06-2016 and directed the respondents to consider
the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by the
Hon’ble High Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh
State Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as
follows:—
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated
15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial
Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for
legal adjudication:—
“Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Harbans Singh S/O Shri Bhag Singh,
R/O Village Danna, P.O. Khawara, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990
by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked
on daily wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after about 22 years vide
demand notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 13-06-
2012, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and
justified? If not, keeping in view delay of about 22 years in raising the industrial dispute,
2002
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 7 twu] 2017@17 T;s"B] 1939
what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-
worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 11th November, 2016
No.11-5/99(Lab)ID/2016/Chamba.—Whereas
the
Labour
Officer-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Chamba has submitted a report as provided under Section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri Kaku Ram S/O Shri
Mahesh Chand, R/O Village Kamla, P.O. Garnota, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. and the
Additional Superintending Engineer, Electrical Division H.P.S.E.B.L., Dalhousie, District Chamba,
H.P. as per demand notice dated nil received in Labour Office Chamba on 01-05-2015 submitted
by the said ex-worker regarding his alleged termination of services.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub- section-5
of Section-12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above
ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during August,
1990 before the above employer after delay of more than 24 years and has worked only for 4, 33,
79 and 76 days during the years 1987, 1988, 1989 and 1990 respectively.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble
High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for
adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal
Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following
issue/issues:—
“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Kaku Ram S/O Shri Mahesh Chand,
R/O Village Kamla, P.O. Garnota, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. during August,
1990 by the Additional Superintending Engineer, Electrical Division H.P.S.E.B.L.,
Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. who has worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has
raised his industrial dispute vide demand notice dated nil received in Labour Office Chamba
on 01-05-2015 after delay of more than 24 years, without complying with the provisions of
2003
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 7 twu] 2017@17 T;s"B] 1939
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of working
period for 4, 33, 79 and 76 days during the years 1987,1988,1989 and 1990 and delay of
more than 24 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority,
past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management? ”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 11th November, 2016
No.:11-5/99(Lab)ID/2016/Chamba.—Whereas
the
Labour
Officer-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Chamba has submitted a report as provided under Section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri Kaliyan Singh S/O
Shri Munshi Ram, R/O Village Kamla, P.O. Garnota, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. and
the Additional Superintending Engineer, Electrical Division H.P.S.E.B.L., Dalhousie, District
Chamba, H.P. as per demand notice dated nil received in Labour Office Chamba on 01-05-2015
submitted by the said ex-worker regarding his alleged termination of services.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub- section-5
of Section-12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above
ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during August,
1990 before the above employer after delay of more than 24 years and has worked from June, 1989
to August, 1990 respectively.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble
High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for
adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal
Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following
issue/issues:—
“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Kaliyan Singh S/O Shri Munshi Ram,
R/O Village Kamla, P.O. Garnota, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. during August,
2004
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 7 twu] 2017@17 T;s"B] 1939
1990 by the Additional Superintending Engineer, Electrical Division H.P.S.E.B.L.,
Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. who has worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has
raised his industrial dispute vide demand notice dated nil received in Labour Office Chamba
on 01-05-2015 after delay of more than 24 years, without complying with the provisions of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of working
period of 51 and 113 days during June, 1989 to August, 1990 and delay of more than 24
years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management? ”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 16th November, 2016
No.:11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Kartar Singh S/O Shri Pritam Singh,
R/O V.P.O. Khwada, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated nil
received in Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 04-03-2013 regarding his illegal termination
from the services by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra,
H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.The Labour
Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial
dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings,
where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the
Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kangra at
Dharamshala was considered, examined and the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh
as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 23 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order
dated 27-04-2015;
And whereas Shri Kartar Singh S/O Shri Pritam Singh agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 1234/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the CWP on dated 15-06-2016 and directed the respondents to consider
the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by the
Hon’ble High Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh
State Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as
follows:—
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
2005
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 7 twu] 2017@17 T;s"B] 1939
Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated
15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial
Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for
legal adjudication:—
“Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Kartar Singh S/O Shri Pritam Singh,
R/O V.P.O. Khwada, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990 by (i) the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily
wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 23 years vide demand
notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 04-03-2013,
without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and
justified? If not, keeping in view delay of more than 23 years in raising the industrial
dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 16th November, 2016
No.:11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Kikar Singh S/O Shri Gurudev Singh,
R/O Village Barnoli, P.O. Bhadwar, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated nil received in Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 04-03-2013 regarding his
illegal termination from the services by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur,
District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra,
H.P.The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P.
tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of
conciliation proceedings, where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kangra at
Dharamshala was considered, examined and the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh
as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 22 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order
dated 21-04-2015;
And whereas Shri Kikar Singh S/O Shri Gurudev Singh agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 1233/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the CWP on dated 15-06-2016 and directed the respondents to consider
the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by the
Hon’ble High Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh
2006
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 7 twu] 2017@17 T;s"B] 1939
State Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as
follows:—
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated
15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial
Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for
legal adjudication:—
“Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Kikar Singh S/O Shri Gurudev Singh,
R/O Village Barnoli, P.O. Bhadwar, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990
by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked
on daily wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 22 years vide
demand notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 04-03-
2013, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and
justified? If not, keeping in view delay of more than 22 years in raising the industrial
dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 19th November, 2016
No.:11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Kushal Ram S/O Shri Bhagat Ram,
R/O Village Nagni, P.O. Bhadwar, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated nil received in Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 04-03-2013 regarding his illegal
termination from the services by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District
Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.The
Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the
industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation
proceedings, where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kangra at
Dharamshala was considered, examined and the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh
2007
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 7 twu] 2017@17 T;s"B] 1939
as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 22 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order
dated 21-04-2015;
And whereas Shri Kushal Ram S/O Shri Bhagat Ram agitated the above orders of declining
of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 1253/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the CWP on dated 15-06-2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the
petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by the Hon’ble High
Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh State
Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as follows:—
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated
15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial
Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for
legal adjudication:—
“Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Kushal Ram S/O Shri Bhagat Ram,
R/O Village Nagni, P.O. Bhadwar, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990
by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked
on daily wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 22 years vide
demand notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 04-03-
2013, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and
justified? If not, keeping in view delay of more than 22 years in raising the industrial
dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 21st November, 2016
No.:11-1/18(Lab)ID/2016/Sunder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Liyakat Ali, President J.L. Nehru Engineering College Workers Union,
O/o House No. 339/4, Salah, P.O. Bhojpur, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. and (i) the
2008
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 7 twu] 2017@17 T;s"B] 1939
Principal, J.N. Government Engineering College, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P.(Principal
employer) (ii) M/S Nuvision Commercial Escorts Private Limited, Ashirwad Sadan, Highway
Heaven, Mehli, Shimla (contractor) on the issue of alleged termination of his services w.e.f. 31-01-
2015.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Government of
Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IVLoose, Dated 15th February, 2014
and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Liyakat Ali, President J.L. Nehru Engineering
College Workers Union, O/o House No. 339/4, Salah, P.O. Bhojpur, Tehsil Sunder Nagar,
District Mandi, H.P. and other workers w.e.f. 31-01-2015 as alleged vide demand notice
dated 19-02-2015 (copy enclosed) by (i) the Principal, J.N. Government Engineering
College, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. (Principal employer) (ii) M/S Nuvision
Commercial Escorts Private Limited, Ashirwad Sadan, Highway Heaven, Mehli, Shimla
(contractor) without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is
legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above workers are entitled to from the above employers/Management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 17th November, 2016
No.:11-5/99(Lab)ID/2016/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Mohinder Kumar S/O Shri Jagat Ram through the General Secretary,
District Committee, AITUC, HQ CHEP Stage-II, Karian, P.O. Hardaspura, Tehsil & District
Chamba, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Chamba Forest Division, District Chamba, H.P. on
the issue of alleged time to time termination of his services during December, 2009 to August, 2014
and finally during September, 2014.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
2009
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 7 twu] 2017@17 T;s"B] 1939
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether time to time termination of services of Shri Mohinder Kumar S/O Shri Jagat
Ram, through the General Secretary, District Committee, AITUC, HQ CHEP Stage-II,
Karian, P.O. Hardaspura, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. during December, 2009 to
August, 2014 and finally during September, 2014 by the Divisional Forest Officer, Chamba
Forest Division, District Chamba, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the
above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 11th November, 2016
No.:11-5/99(Lab)ID/2016/Chamba.—Whereas
the
Labour
Officer-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Chamba has submitted a report as provided under Section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri Paras Ram S/O Shri
Lal Singh, R/O Village Kamla, P.O. Garnota, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. and the
Additional Superintending Engineer, Electrical Division H.P.S.E.B.L., Dalhousie, District Chamba,
H.P. as per demand notice dated 27-08-2015 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding his alleged
termination of services.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub- section-5
of Section-12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above
ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during January,
1991 before the above employer after delay of more than 24 years and has worked during March,
1987 and December, 1990 respectively.
2010
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 7 twu] 2017@17 T;s"B] 1939
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble
High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for
adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal
Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following
issue/issues:—
“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Paras Ram S/O Shri Lal Singh, R/O
Village Kamla, P.O. Garnota, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. during January, 1991
by the Additional Superintending Engineer, Electrical Division H.P.S.E.B.L., Dalhousie,
District Chamba, H.P. who has worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his
industrial dispute vide demand notice dated 27-08-2015 after delay of more than 24 years,
without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, keeping in view of working period from March, 1987 to December, 1990
and delay of more than 24 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back
wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above exworker is entitled to
from the above employer/management? ”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
___________
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171 001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 31st May, 2017
No.HHC/Admn.10(155)/92-XVII.—In continuation of this Registry Notification No.HHC/
Admn.10(155)/92-XVII-9493-527, dated 19-04-2016 and in exercise of powers vested in Hon’ble
the Chief Justice under section 5(2) of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and
Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (Act No. 4 of 2016), Hon’ble the Acting
Chief Justice has been pleased to order that ‘Commercial Appellate Division’ shall consist of three
Division Benches and the Judges of the Principal Division Benches, as per Roster, are hereby
nominated to be the Judges of the ‘Commercial Appellate Division’.
By order,
Sd/-
Registrar General.
2011
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 7 twu] 2017@17 T;s"B] 1939
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171 001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 31st May, 2017
No.HHC/Admn.10(155)/92-XVII.—In continuation of this Registry Notification No.HHC/
Admn.10(155)/92-XVII-9458-92, dated 19-04-2016 and in exercise of powers vested in Hon’ble
the Chief Justice under section 4(2) of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and
Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (Act No. 4 of 2016), Hon’ble the Acting
Chief Justice has been pleased to nominate the following Hon’ble Judges to be the Judges of the
two Commercial Division (Single Benches):
1.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge,
2. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge.
By order,
Sd/-
Registrar General.
_____________
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA – 171 001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 2nd June, 2017
No.HHC/Admn.6 (20)/77-XVIII.—Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to
nominate Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, as the Vacation Judge, for urgent court work
during the Summer Vacation from 05-6-2017 to 09-6-2017.
By order,
Sd/-
Registrar General.
_____________
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171 001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 30th May, 2017
No.HHC/Admn.16 (9)74-IX.—Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice, in exercise of the powers
vested in him U/S 139(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, U/S 297(1) (b) of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Rule 5(vi) of the H.P. Oath Commissioners (Appointment &
Control) Rules, 2007 has been pleased to appoint Sh. Aman Thakur, Sh. Ravi Kumar, Sh. Naresh
2012
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 7 twu] 2017@17 T;s"B] 1939
Kumar, Ms. Tina Kumari, Sh. Kulbhushan Jamwal, Sh. Jatender, Sh. Hukam Chand and Ms.
Yamini Kuthiala, Advocates, Mandi as Oath Commissioners at Mandi for a period of two years
with immediate effect for administering oaths and affirmations on affidavits to the deponents under
the aforesaid Codes and Rules.
By order,
Sd/-
Registrar General.
_____________
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA -171001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 30th May, 2017
No.HHC/GAZ/14-304/09-Part.—Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to
grant 10 days earned leave w.e.f. 31-05-2017 to 09-06-2017 with permission to suffix Second
Saturday and Sunday falling on 10-06-2017 and 11-06-2017 in favour of Sh. Surya Parkash, Senior
Civil Judge-cum-ACJM, Dehra, District Kangra, H.P.
Certified that Sh. Surya Parkash is likely to join the same post and at the same station from
where he proceeds on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.
Also certified that Sh. Surya Parkash would have continued to hold the post of Senior Civil
Judge-cum-ACJM, Dehra, District Kangra, H.P., but for his proceeding on leave for the above
period.
By order,
Sd/-
Registrar General.
_____________
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA-171001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 1st June, 2017
No.HHC/GAZ/14-374/2016.—Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant
07 days earned leave w.e.f. 02-06-2017 to 08-06-2017 in favour of Ms. Deepika Thakran, Civil
Judge-cum-JM-III, Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, H.P.
Certified that Ms. Deepika Thakran is likely to join the same post and at the same station
from where she proceeds on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.
2013
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 7 twu] 2017@17 T;s"B] 1939
Also certified that Ms. Deepika Thakran would have continued to hold the post of Civil
Judge-cum-JM-III, Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, H.P., but for her proceeding on leave for the
above period.
By order,
Sd/-
Registrar General.
_____________
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA-171001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla the 1st June, 2017
No. HHC/GAZ/14-341/2014.—Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant
10 days’ earned leave w.e.f. 28-6-2017 to 7-7-2017 with permission to prefix Sunday, Gazetted and
local holidays falling on 25-6-2017 to 27-6-2017 in favour of Smt. Pratibha Negi, Civil Judge-cum-
JMIC-I, Solan, H.P.
Certified that Smt. Pratibha Negi is likely to join the same post and at the same station from
where she proceeds on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.
Also certified that Smt. Pratibha Negi would have continued to hold the post of Civil Judge
cum-JMIC-1,Solan, H.P., but for her proceeding on leave for the above period.
By order,
Sd/-
Registrar General.
_____________
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA – 171 001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 31st May, 2017
No.HHC/GAZ/14-263/2003.—Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant
ex post facto sanction of 2 days earned leave for 21-05-2017 and 22-05-2017 in favour of Shri
Sachin Raghu, Senior Civil Judge-cum-CJM, Solan, HP.
Certified that Shri Sachin Raghu had joined the same post and at the same station from
where he proceeded on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.
Also certified that Shri Sachin Raghu would have continued to hold the post of Senior Civil
Judge-cum-CJM, Solan but for his proceeding on leave for the above period.
By order,
Sd/-
Registrar General.
2014
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 7 twu] 2017@17 T;s"B] 1939
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA– 171 001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 1st June, 2017
No.HHC/GAZ/14-225/96-I.—Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant
11 days earned leave w.e.f. 27-06-2017 to 07-07-2017 with permission to prefix Sunday and
Gazetted holiday falling on 25-06-2017 and 26-06-2017 and suffix Second Saturday and Sunday
falling on 08-07-2017 and 09-07-2017 in favour of Shri Yogesh Jaswal, District & Sessions Judge,
Chamba, HP.
Certified that Shri Yogesh Jaswal is likely to join the same post and at the same station from
where he proceeded on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.
Also certified that Shri Yogesh Jaswal would have continued to hold the post of District &
Sessions Judge, Chamba but for his proceeding on leave for the above period.
By order,
Sd/-
Registrar General.
________
c vnkyr Jh y{e.k flag] lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; oxZ] mi&rglhy /kjokyk]
ftyk pEck] fg0 iz0
pj.kksa iq= gksf'k;kj] fuoklh pMh] Mkd?kj eSgyk] mi&rglhy /kjokyk] ftyk pEck] fg0 iz0
cuke
vke turk
fo"k;-&&izkFkZuk&i= cjk;s uke n#Lrh ckjsA
mijksDr izkFkhZ us v/kksgLrk{kjh dh vnkyr esa izkFkZuk i= e; gYQh C;ku o vU; dkxtkr bl
vk'k; ls xqtkjk gS fd mldk lgh uke pj.kksa gS tks lgh ntZ gS ysfdu jktLo foHkkx ds eqgky pMh esa
pj.k flag ntZ gSA ftldh n#Lrh dh tkosA
bl lEcU/k esa loZlk/kkj.k turk dks ctfj;k b'rgkj lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ pj.kksa ds
uke dh n#Lrh ckjs ;fn fdlh dks dksbZ mtj@,rjkt gks rks og vlkyru ;k odkyru v/kksgLrk{kjh
fnukad 14&06&2017 dks vkdj viuk ,rjkt ntZ djok ldrk gSA gkftj u vkus dh lwjr esa ,d rjQk
dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ tk djds uke n#Lrh ds vkns'k ns fn;s tk;saxsA
2015
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 7 twu] 2017@17 T;s"B] 1939
vkt fnukad 28&04&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
y{e.k flag]
lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; oxZ]
mi&rglhy /kjokyk] ftyk pEck] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&&
c vnkyr Jh y{e.k flag] lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; oxZ] mi&rglhy /kjokyk]
ftyk pEck] fg0 iz0
nsoh flag mQZ nsoks iq= epyw] fuoklh dysjk] ijxuk I;wgjk] mi&rglhy /kjokyk] ftyk pEck
cuke
vke turk
fo"k;-&&izkFkZuk&i= cjk;s uke n#Lrh ckjsA
mijksDr izkFkhZ us v/kksgLrk{kjh dh vnkyr esa izkFkZuk i= e; gYQh C;ku o vU; dkxtkr bl
vk'k; ls xqtkjk gS fd mldk lgh uke nsoks gS tks lgh ntZ gS ysfdu jktLo foHkkx ds eqgky yM~Mk esa
nsoh flag ntZ gSA ftldh n#Lrh dh tkosA
bl lEcU/k esa loZlk/kkj.k turk dks ctfj;k b'rgkj lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ nsoh flag
mQZ nsoks ds uke dh n#Lrh ckjs ;fn fdlh dks dksbZ mtj@,rjkt gks rks og vlkyru ;k odkyru
v/kksgLrk{kjh fnukad 14&06&2017 dks vkdj viuk ,rjkt ntZ djok ldrk gSA gkftj u vkus dh lwjr
esa ,d rjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ tk djds uke n#Lrh ds vkns'k ns fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 27&04&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
y{e.k flag]
lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; oxZ]
mi&rglhy /kjokyk] ftyk pEck] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&&&&
c vnkyr Jh y{e.k flag] lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; oxZ] mi&rglhy /kjokyk]
ftyk pEck] fg0 iz0
vej pUn jkou xkao xqvkM+h] ijxuk fygy] mi&rglhy /kjokyk] ftyk pEck] fg0 iz0
cuke
2016
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 7 twu] 2017@17 T;s"B] 1939
vke turk
fo"k;-&&izkFkZuk&i= cjk;s uke n#Lrh ckjsA
mijksDr izkFkhZ us v/kksgLrk{kjh dh vnkyr esa izkFkZuk i= e; gYQh C;ku o vU; dkxtkr bl
vk'k; ls xqtkjk gS fd mldk lgh uke vej pUn gS tks lgh ntZ gS ysfdu jktLo foHkkx ds eqgky
eYyk esa ve: ntZ gSA ftldh n#Lrh dh tkosA
bl lEcU/k esa loZlk/kkj.k turk dks ctfj;k b'rgkj lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ vej pUn ds
uke dh n#Lrh ckjs ;fn fdlh dks dksbZ mtj@,rjkt gks rks og vlkyru ;k odkyru v/kksgLrk{kjh
fnukad 14&06&2017 dks vkdj viuk ,rjkt ntZ djok ldrk gSA gkftj u vkus dh lwjr esa ,d rjQk
dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ tk djds uke n#Lrh ds vkns'k ns fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 27&04&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
y{e.k flag]
lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; oxZ]
mi&rglhy /kjokyk] ftyk pEck] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&&&&
c vnkyr Jh y{e.k flag] lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; oxZ mi&rglhy /kjokyk]
ftyk pEck] fg0 iz0
tksfxUnj flag iq= HkDrks] fuoklh xkao o ijxuk cdk.k] mi&rglhy /kjokyk] ftyk pEck] fg0 iz0
cuke
vke turk
fo"k;-&&izkFkZuk&i= cjk;s uke n#Lrh ckjsA
mijksDr izkFkhZ us v/kksgLrk{kjh dh vnkyr esa izkFkZuk i= e; gYQh C;ku o vU; dkxtkr bl
vk'k; ls xqtkjk gS fd mldk lgh uke tksfxUnj flag gS tks lgh ntZ gS ysfdu jktLo foHkkx ds eqgky
jkEHkks esa ?ksUnj ntZ gSA ftldh n#Lrh dh tkosA
bl lEcU/k esa loZlk/kkj.k turk dks ctfj;k b'rgkj lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ tksfxUnj
flag ds uke dh n#Lrh ckjs ;fn fdlh dks dksbZ mtj@,rjkt gks rks og vlkyru ;k odkyru
v/kksgLrk{kjh fnukad 14&06&2017 dks vkdj viuk ,rjkt ntZ djok ldrk gSA gkftj u vkus dh lwjr
esa ,d rjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ tk djds uke n#Lrh ds vkns'k ns fn;s tk;saxsA
2017
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 7 twu] 2017@17 T;s"B] 1939
vkt fnukad 27&04&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
y{e.k flag]
lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; oxZ]
mi&rglhy /kjokyk] ftyk pEck] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&&&
c vnkyr Jh y{e.k flag] lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; oxZ mi&rglhy /kjokyk]
ftyk pEck] fg0 iz0
lqjthr dqekj iq= Hks[kq] fuoklh lknw.k] ijxuk clw] mi&rglhy /kjokyk] ftyk pEck] fg0 iz0
cuke
vke turk
fo"k;-&&izkFkZuk&i= cjk;s uke n#Lrh ckjsA
mijksDr izkFkhZ us v/kksgLrk{kjh dh vnkyr esa izkFkZuk i= e; gYQh C;ku o vU; dkxtkr bl
vk'k; ls xqtkjk gS fd mldk lgh uke lqjthr dqekj gS tks lgh ntZ gS ysfdu jktLo foHkkx ds eqgky
lknw.k esa izhre ntZ gSA ftldh n#Lrh dh tkosA
bl lEcU/k esa loZlk/kkj.k turk dks ctfj;k b'rgkj lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ lqjthr
dqekj ds uke dh n#Lrh ckjs ;fn fdlh dks dksbZ mtj@,rjkt gks rks og vlkyru ;k odkyru
v/kksgLrk{kjh fnukad 14&06&2017 dks vkdj viuk ,rjkt ntZ djok ldrk gSA gkftj u vkus dh lwjr
eas ,d rjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ tk djds uke n#Lrh ds vkns'k ns fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 27&04&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
y{e.k flag]
lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; oxZ]
mi&rglhy /kjokyk] ftyk pEck] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&&&&
c vnkyr Jh y{e.k flag] lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; oxZ mi&rglhy /kjokyk]
ftyk pEck] fg0 iz0
jru pUn iq= pek:] fuoklh fVEcw] ijxuk clw] mi&rglhy /kjokyk] ftyk pEck] fg0 iz0
cuke
vke turk
2018
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 7 twu] 2017@17 T;s"B] 1939
fo"k;-&&izkFkZuk&i= cjk;s uke n#Lrh ckjsA
mijksDr izkFkhZ us v/kksgLrk{kjh dh vnkyr esa izkFkZuk i= e; gYQh C;ku o vU; dkxtkr bl
vk'k; ls xqtkjk gS fd mldk lgh uke jru pUn gS tks lgh ntZ gS ysfdu jktLo foHkkx ds eqgky
e>kVk esa jruw ntZ gSA ftldh n#Lrh dh tkosA
bl lEcU/k esa loZlk/kkj.k turk dks ctfj;k b'rgkj lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ jru pUn ds
uke dh n#Lrh ckjs ;fn fdlh dks dksbZ mtj@,rjkt gks rks og vlkyru ;k odkyru v/kksgLrk{kjh
fnukad 14&06&2017 dks vkdj viuk ,rjkt ntZ djok ldrk gSA gkftj u vkus dh lwjr esa ,d rjQk
dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ tk djds uke n#Lrh ds vkns'k ns fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 27&04&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
y{e.k flag]
lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; oxZ]
mi&rglhy /kjokyk] ftyk pEck] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&&&&
In the Court of Arindam Chaudhary, I.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional
Magistrate, Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh
In the matter of :
Amit Kumar aged 22 years s/o Shri Phoolpati, r/o Tikka Pachpeda Barbata, Khiri Borbatta
(U.P.) c/o Vasudev s/o Shri Roshan Lal r/o Tikka Chokkar, P.O. Aghar, Tehsil & District Hamirpur
(H.P.).
and
Sarswati aged 21 years d/o Shri Babu Ram, r/o Tikka Pachpeda barbata, Khiri Borbatta
(U.P.) c/o Vasudev s/o Shri Roshan Lal r/o Tikka Chokkar, P.O. Aghar, Tehsil & District Hamirpur
(H.P.)
. . Applicants.
Versus
General Public
2019
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 7 twu] 2017@17 T;s"B] 1939
Subject.— Notice under the Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Amit Kumar and Sarswati have filed an application u/s 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954
alongwith affidavit and other supported documents in the court of undersigned in which they stated
that they solemnized marriage on 01-02-2017.
Therefore, the General Public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who
has any objection for this marriage can file the objection personally or in writing before this court
on or before 21-06-17. The objection received after 21-06-17 will not be entertained and marriage
will be registered accordingly.
Issued today on 20-05-2017 under my hand and seal of the court.
Seal.
Sd/-
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate,
Hamirpur (H.P.).
_________
c vnkyr tukc lgk;d lekgrkZ ,oa dk;kZdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh izFke Js.kh] Tokyh]
ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0
Jherh vatuk nsoh iRuh Lo0 Jh ohjsUnj flag] fuoklh egky uxjksVk lwfj;ka] ekStk uxjksVk lwfj;ka]
rglhy Tokyh] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0A
cuke
vke turk
izkFkZuk&i= tsj /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oe~ e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969-
Jherh vatuk nsoh iRuh Lo0 Jh ohjsUnj flag] fuoklh xkao o Mkd?kj uxjksVk lwfj;ka] rglhy
Tokyh] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0 us bl vnkyr esa izkFkZuk&i= xqtkjk gS fd Jh ohjsUnj flag iq= j.k flag
dh e`R;q 16&7&1999 dks xkao uxjksVk lwfj;ka esa gqbZ Fkh tks xyrh ls iapk;r fjdkMZ esa iathd`r ugh
djok ldhA vc e`R;q frfFk iapk;r fjdkMZ esa ntZ djokuk pkgrh gSA
vr% bl uksfVl ds ek/;e ls loZlk/kkj.k dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh O;fDr dks
mijksDr iathdj.k ds ckjs esa dksbZ mtj o ,rjkt gks rks og fnukad 22&6&2017 dks lqcg 10 cts bl
U;k;ky; esa vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj vkdj is'k dj ldrk gS vU;Fkk gkftj u vkus dh lwjr esa
;drjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ tkdj e`R;q frfFk iapk;r fjdkMZ esa iathd`r djus ds vkns'k ikfjr dj
fn;s tk;saxsA blds mijkUr dksbZ ,rjkt u lquk tk;sxkA
2020
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 7 twu] 2017@17 T;s"B] 1939
vkt fnukad 24&5&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
lgk;d lekgrkZ ,oa dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh izFke Js.kh]
TokyhA
fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr
bysDVªkWfud gLrk{kfjr jkti=] oSclkbV http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in ij miyC/k gS ,oe~ vkWuykbu lR;kfir fd;k tk ldrk gS