jkti=] fgekpy izns'k

fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr

ohjokj] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

fgekpy izns'k ljdkj

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 28^th November, 2016

No.:11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Tulsi Ram S/O Shri Nanku Ram, R/O

V.P.O. Kopra, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated nil received

in Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 13-06-2011 regarding his illegal termination from the

50&jkti=@2017&08&06&2017

¼2021½

2022

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

services by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.The Labour Officer-cum-

Conciliation Officer Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial

dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings,

where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the

Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kangra at

Dharamshala was considered, examined and the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as

appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of more than 23 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order

dated 22-08-2013;

And whereas Shri Tulsi Ram S/O Shri Nanku Ram agitated the above orders of declining of

reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 495/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the CWP on dated 19-03-2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the

petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30^th December, 2014, delivered by the Hon’ble High

Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh State

Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as follows:-

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated

15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial

Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for

legal adjudication:—

“Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Tulsi Ram S/O Shri Nanku Ram, R/O

V.P.O. Kopra, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during January, 1987 by (i) the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily

wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 23 years vide demand

notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 13-06-2011,

without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and

justified? If not, keeping in view delay of more than 23 years in raising the industrial

dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the

above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

2023

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 28^th November, 2016

No.:11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Nirmal Singh S/O Shri Raghu Nath

Singh, R/O V.P.O. Khanni, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated

nil received in Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 04-03-2013 regarding his illegal

termination from the services by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District

Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.The

Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to

settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of

conciliation proceedings, where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kangra at

Dharamshala was considered, examined and the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh

as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of about 23 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated

31-12-2014;

And whereas Shri Nirmal Singh S/O Shri Raghu Nath Singh agitated the above orders of

declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High

Court of Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 890/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal

Pradesh has disposed off the CWP on dated 19-04-2016 and directed the respondents to consider

the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by the

Hon’ble High Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh

State Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as

follows:—

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated

15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial

Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for

legal adjudication :—

“Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Nirmal Singh S/O Shri Raghu Nath

Singh, R/O V.P.O. Khanni, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990 by (i)

the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked

on daily wages as beldar and has raised his indu strial dispute after about 23 years vide

demand notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 04-03-

2013, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and

justified? If not, keeping in view delay of about 23 years in raising the industrial dispute,

2024

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-

worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 11^th November, 2016

No.:11-5/99(Lab)ID/2016/Chamba.—Whereas

the

Labour

Officer-cum-Conciliation

Officer, Chamba has submitted a report as provided under Section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri Paras Ram S/O Shri

Lal Singh, R/O Village Kamla, P.O. Garnota, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. and the

Additional Superintending Engineer, Electrical Division H.P.S.E.B.L., Dalhousie, District Chamba,

H.P. as per demand notice dated 27-08-2015 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding his alleged

termination of services.

Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that

during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and

amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts

for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said

dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial

dispute.

Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub- section-5

of Section-12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above

ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during January,

1991 before the above employer after delay of more than 24 years and has worked during March,

1987 and December, 1990 respectively.

Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising

the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-

IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble

High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for

adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal

Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following

issue/issues:—

“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Paras Ram S/O Shri Lal Singh, R/O

Village Kamla, P.O. Garnota, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. during January, 1991

by the Additional Superintending Engineer, Electrical Division H.P.S.E.B.L., Dalhousie,

District Chamba, H.P. who has worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his

2025

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

industrial dispute vide demand notice dated 27-08-2015 after delay of more than 24 years,

without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and

justified? If not, keeping in view of working period from March, 1987 to December, 1990

and delay of more than 24 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back

wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above exworker is entitled to

from the above employer/management? ”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 28^th November, 2016

No.:11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Mandi.—Whereas

the

Labour

Officer-cum-Conciliation

Officer, Mandi has submitted a report as provided under Section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri Prakash Chand S/O

Shri Achhar Singh, R/O Village Chowari, P.O. Balag, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P.

and the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. as per

demand notice dated 21-01-2015 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding his alleged termination

of services.

Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that

during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and

amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts

for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said

dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial

dispute.

Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub- section-5

of Section-12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above

ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during December,

2010 before the above employer after delay of more than 4 years and has worked during year, 1998

to December, 2010.

Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising

the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-

IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble

High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for

adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal

Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following

issue/issues:—

“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Prakash Chand S/O Shri Achhar Singh,

R/O Village Chowari, P.O. Balag, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. during

2026

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

December, 2010 by the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar,

District Mandi, H.P. who has worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his

industrial dispute vide demand notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Mandi on 21-

01-2015 after delay of more than 4 years, without complying with the provisions of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of working

period from year, 1998 to December, 2010 and delay of more than 4 years in raising the

industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and

compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management? ”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 7^th November, 2016

No.:11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Pritam Chand S/O Shri Chatro Ram,

R/O V.P.O. Danni, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated nil

received in Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 29-11-2012 regarding his illegal termination

from the services by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra,

H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.The Labour

Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial

dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings,

where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the

Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kangra at

Dharamshala was considered, examined and the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh

as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of more than 21 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order

dated 23-03-2015;

And whereas Shri Pritam Chand S/O Shri Chatro Ram agitated the above orders of

declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High

Court of Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 1043/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal

Pradesh has disposed off the CWP on dated 24-05-2016 and directed the respondents to consider

the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by the

Hon’ble High Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh

State Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as

follows:—

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

2027

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated

15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial

Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for

legal adjudication:—

“Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Pritam Chand S/O Shri Chatro Ram,

R/O V.P.O. Danni, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990 by (i) the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily

wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 21 years vide demand

notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 29-11-2012,

without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and

justified? If not, keeping in view delay of more than 21 years in raising the industrial

dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the

above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 10^th November, 2016

No.:11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Raghubir Singh S/O Shri Mansa Ram,

R/O V.P.O. Aund, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated nil

received in Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 04-03-2013 regarding his illegal termination

from the services by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra,

H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.The Labour

Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial

dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings,

where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the

Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kangra at

Dharamshala was considered, examined and the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh

as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of more than 22 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order

dated 29-05-2015;

And whereas Shri Raghubir Singh S/O Shri Mansa Ram agitated the above orders of

declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High

2028

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

Court of Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 1067/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal

Pradesh has disposed off the CWP on dated 01-06-2016 and directed the respondents to consider

the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by the

Hon’ble High Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh

State Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as

follows:—

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated

15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial

Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for

legal adjudication:—

“Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Raghubir Singh S/O Shri Mansa Ram,

R/O V.P.O. Aund, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990 by (i) the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily

wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 22 years vide demand

notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 04-03-2013,

without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and

justified? If not, keeping in view delay of more than 22 years in raising the industrial

dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the

above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 16^th November, 2016

No.:11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Mandi.—Whereas

the

Labour

Officer-cum-Conciliation

Officer, Mandi has submitted a report as provided under Section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri Raju Ram S/O Shri

Relu Ram, R/O Village Chah, P.O. Mandap, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. and the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. as per demand notice

dated 11-12-2014 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding his alleged termination of services.

2029

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that

during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and

amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts

for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said

dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial

dispute.

Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub- section-5

of Section-12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above

ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services w.e.f. 01-04-2000

before the above employer after delay of more than 14 years and has worked during year, 1999 to

31-03-2000 respectively.

Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising

the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-

IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble

High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for

adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal

Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following

issue/issues:—

“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Raju Ram S/O Shri Relu Ram, R/O

Village Chah, P.O. Mandap, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 01-04-2000 by

the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. who has

worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his industrial dispute vide demand

notice dated 11-12-2014 after delay of more than 14 years, without complying with the

provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view

of working period from year, 1999 to 31-03-2000 and delay of more than 14 years in raising

the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and

compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management? ”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 28^th November, 2016

No.:11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Ram Singh S/O Shri Kirpa Ram, R/O

V.P.O. Gurchal, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated nil received

in Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 29-11-2012 regarding his illegal termination from the

services by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.The Labour Officer-cum-

Conciliation Officer Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial

dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings,

where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the

Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

2030

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kangra at

Dharamshala was considered, examined and the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as

appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of more than 21 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order

dated 24-03-2015;

And whereas Shri Ram Singh S/O Shri Kirpa Ram agitated the above orders of declining of

reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 1231/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the CWP on dated 15-06-2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the

petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30^th December, 2014, delivered by the Hon’ble High

Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh State

Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as follows:-

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated

15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial

Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for

legal adjudication:—

“Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Ram Singh S/O Shri Kirpa Ram, R/O

V.P.O. Gurchal, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990 by (i) the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily wages as beldar and

has raised his indu strial dispute after more than 21 years vide demand notice dated nil received in

the Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 29-11-2012, without complying the provisions of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view delay of more than 21

years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits

and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 28^th November, 2016

No.:11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Ranja Ram S/O Shri Nanku Ram, R/O

V.P.O. Kopra, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated nil received

in Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 13-06-2011 regarding his illegal termination from the

2031

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

services by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.The Labour Officer-cum-

Conciliation Officer Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial

dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings,

where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the

Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kangra at

Dharamshala was considered, examined and the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as

appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of more than 20 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order

dated 13-08-2013;

And whereas Shri Ranja Ram S/O Shri Nanku Ram has agitated the above orders of

declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High

Court of Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 749/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal

Pradesh has disposed off the CWP on dated 06-04-2016 and directed the respondents to consider

the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by the

Hon’ble High Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh

State Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as

follows:-

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated

15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial

Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for

legal adjudication:—

“Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Ranja Ram S/O Shri Nanku Ram, R/O

V.P.O. Kopra, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during July, 1990 by (i) the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily wages as

beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 20 years vide demand notice

dated nil received in the Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 13-06-2011, without

complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not,

keeping in view delay of more than 20 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount

of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is

entitled to from the above employers/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

2032

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 25^th November, 2016

No.:11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Roshan Deen S/O Shri Ramjaan Deen,

R/O V.P.O. Haddal, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated nil

received in Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 13-06-2011 regarding his illegal termination

from the services by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra,

H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.The Labour

Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the

industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation

proceedings, where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act,

1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kangra at

Dharamshala was considered, examined and the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as

appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of about 21 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated

31-08-2013;

And whereas Shri Roshan Deen S/O Shri Ramjaan Deen has agitated the above orders of

declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High

Court of Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 489/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal

Pradesh has disposed off the CWP on dated 19-03-2016 and directed the respondents to consider

the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by the

Hon’ble High Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh

State Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as

follows:—

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated

15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial

Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for

legal adjudication:—

“Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Roshan Deen S/O Shri Ramjaan Deen,

R/O V.P.O. Haddal, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990 by (i) the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily

wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after about 21 years vide demand

notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 13-06-2011,

without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and

justified? If not, keeping in view delay of about 21 years in raising the industrial dispute,

2033

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-

worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

dkfeZd foHkkx ¼fu;qfDr&II½

vf/klwpuk

f”keyk&171 002] 6 twu] 2017

la[;k% ij¼,ih&ch½ch¼2½&1@2017-&&fgekpy izns”k ds jkT;iky] Hkkjr ds lafo/kku ds

vuqPNsn 309 ds ijUrqd }kjk iznŸk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] fgekpy izns”k deZpkjh p;u vk;ksx]

gehjiqj esa nQrjh] oxZ&IV ¼vjktif=r½ ds in ds fy, bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu mikcU/k Þdß ds

vuqlkj HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;e cukrs gSa] vFkkZr~%&&

1- laf{kIr uke vkSj izkjEHk-&&¼1½ bu fu;eksa dk laf{kIr uke fgekpy izns”k deZpkjh p;u

vk;ksx] gehjiqj] nQrjh] oxZ&IV ¼vjktif=r½ HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;e] 2017 gSA

¼2½ ;s fu;e jkti=] fgekpy izns”k esa izdkf”kr fd, tkus dh rkjh[k ls izo`r gksaxsA

vkns”k }kjk]

oh lh Qkjdk]

eq[; lfpoA

&&&&&&&&&&

mikcU/k&^d*

fgekpy izns”k deZpkjh p;u vk;ksx] gehjiqj esa nQrjh] oxZ&IV ¼vjktif=r½ ds in ds fy,

HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;e

1- Ikn dk uke-&&nQrjh

2- inksa dh la[;k-&&1 ¼,d½

3- oxhZdj.k-&&oxZ& IV ¼vjktif=r½

4- osrueku-&&iS cS.M `4900&10680 +1650 xzsM is

5- p;u in vFkok vp;u in-&&vp;u A

2034

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

6- lh/kh HkrhZ ds fy, vk;q-&&ykxw ughA

7- lh/ks HkrhZ fd, tkus okys O;fDr ¼O;fDr;ksa½ ds fy, visf{kr U;wure 'kSf{kd vkSj vU;

vgZrk,a-&&ykxw ughaA

8- lh/ks HkrhZ fd, tkus okys O;fDr ¼O;fDr;ksa½ ds fy, fofgr vk;q vkSj 'kSf{kd vgZrk,a]

izksUufr dh n”kk esa ykxw gksxh-&&vk;q-&&ykxw ugh A

'kSf{kd vgrkZ-&&ykxw ugh

9- ifjoh{kk dh vof/k] ;fn dksbZ gks-&&ykxw ughA

10- HkrhZ dh Ik}fr&HkrhZ lh/kh gksxh ;k izksUufr] lSds.MeSUV] LFkkukUrj.k }kjk vkSj fofHkUu

Ik}fr;ksa }kjk Hkjs tkus okys in ¼inksa½ dh izfr”krrk-&&'krizfr”kr izksUufr }kjk A

11- [email protected]@LFkkukUrj.k }kjk HkrhZ dh n”kk esa os Jsf.k;ka ¼xzsM½ ftuls

[email protected]@LFkkukUrj.k fd;k tk,xk-&&piM+kfl;ksa@pkSdhnkjksa@Lohijksa esa ls izksUufr }kjk]

ftudk rhu o’kZ dk fu;fer lsokdky] ;k xszM esa dh xbZ yxkrkj rnFkZ lsok, ;fn dksbZ gks] dks

lfEefyr djds rhu o’kZ dk la;qDr fu;fer lsokdky gks A

fVIi.kh-&&izksUufr ds iz;kstu ds fy, ik= deZpkfj;ksa dh vius&vius xszM esa mudh

dkMj&vuqlkj ofj"Brk dks NksMs fcuk] lsokdky ds vk/kkj ij ,d la;qDr ofj"Brk lwph rS;kj dh

tk,xhA

¼1½ izksUufr ds lHkh ekeyksa esa in ij fu;fer fu;qfDr ls iwoZ lEHkjd ¼iks"kd½ in esa dh xbZ

yxkrkj rnFkZ lsok] ;fn dksbZ gks] izksUufr ds fy, bu fu;eksa esa ;Fkk fofgr lsokdky ds fy,, bl

'krZ ds v/khu jgrs gq, x.kuk esa yh tk,xh] fd lEHkjd ¼iks"kd½ izoxZ esa rnFkZ fu;qfDr@izksUufr HkrhZ

vkSj izksUufr fu;eksa ds micU/kksa ds vuqlkj p;u dh mfpr Lohdk;Z izfØ;k dks viukus ds Ik”pkr~ dh xbZ

Fkh %

ijUrq mu lHkh ekeyksa esa ftu esa dksbZ dfu"B O;fDRk lEHkjd ¼iks"kd½ in esa vius dqy lsokdky

¼rnFkZ vk/kkj ij dh xbZ rnFkZ lsok lfgr tks fu;fer lsok@fu;qfDr ds vuqlj.k esa gks½ ds vk/kkj ij

mi;qZDr fufnZ"V micU/kksa ds dkj.k fopkj fd, tkus dk ik= gks tkrk gS, ogka vius&vius

izoxZ@in@dkMj esa mlls ofj"B lHkh O;fDr fopkj fd, tkus ds ik= le>sa tk,axs vkSj fopkj djrs

le; dfu"B O;fDr ls Åij j[ksa tk,axs %

ijUrq ;g vkSj fd mu lHkh in/kkfj;ksa dh] ftu ij izksUufr ds fy, fopkj fd;k tkuk gS] dh

de ls de rhu o"kZ dh U;wure vgZrk lsok ;k in ds HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;eksa esa fofgr lsok] tks Hkh

de gks] gksxh %

ijUrq ;g vkSj fd] tgka dksbZ O;fDr iwoZxkeh ijUrqd dh vis{kkvksa ds dkj.k izksUufr fd, tkus

lEcU/kh fopkj ds fy, vik= gks tkrk gS] ogka mlls dfu"B O;fDr Hkh ,slh izksUufr ds fopkj ds fy,

vik= le>k tk,xk@le>s tk,axs A

Li"Vhdj.k-&&vfUre ijUrqd ds vUrxZr dfu"B in/kkjh izksUufr ds fy, vik= ugha le>k

tk,xk ;fn ofj"B vik= O;fDr HkwriwoZ lSfud gS ftls fMeksfcykbtM vkeZM QksflZt ijlskuy ¼fjtZos”ku

vkWQ osdSUlht bu fgekpy LVsV ukWu VsDuhdy lfoZflt½ :Yt 1972] ds fu;e&3 ds micU/kksa ds

vUrxZr HkrhZ fd;k x;k gks rFkk buds vUrxZr ojh;rk ykHk fn, x, gksa ;k ftls ,DllfoZleSu

¼fjtoZ”ku vkWQ osdSUlht bu nh fgekpy izns”k VsDuhdy lfoZflt½ :Yt] 1985 ds fu;e&3 ds

micU/kksa ds vUrxrZ HkrhZ fd;k x;k gks vkSj blds vUrxZr ojh;rk ykHk fn, x, gks A

2035

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

¼2½ blh izdkj LFkk;hdj.k ds lHkh ekeyksa esa ,sls in ij fu;fer fu;qfDr ls iwoZ lEHkjd

¼iks"kd½ in ij dh xbZ yxkrkj rnFkZ lsok] ;fn dksbZ gks] lsokdky ds fy, x.kuk esa yh tk,xh]

;fn rnFkZ fu;qfDr@izksUufr] mfpr p;u ds i”pkr~ vkSj HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;eksa ds micU/kksa ds vuqlkj

dh xbZ Fkh %

ijUrq mi;ZqDr fufnZ"V rnFkZ lsok dks x.kuk esa ysus ds Ik”pkr~ tks LFkk;hdj.k gksxk mlds

QyLo:i ikjLifjd ojh;rk vifjofrZr jgsxh A

12- ;fn foHkkxh; izksUufr lfefr fo|eku gks] rks mldh lajpuk-&&tSlh ljdkj }kjk

le;≤ ij xfBr dh tk,A

13- HkrhZ djus esa ftu ifjfLFkfr;kas esasa fgekpy izns”k yksd lsok vk;ksx ls ijke'kZ fd;k

tk,xk-&&tSlk fof/k }kjk visf{kr gksA

14- lh/kh HkrhZ ds fy, vfuok;Z vis{kk-&&ykxw ugh A

15- lh/kh HkrhZ ds fy, p;u-&&ykxw ugh A

16- vkj{k.k-&&lsok esa fu;qfDr] fgekpy izns”k ljdkj }kjk le;≤ ij vuqlwfpr

tkfr;ksa@vuqlwfpr tutkfr;ksa@vU; fiNMs+ oxkZsa vkSj O;fDr;ksa ds vU; izoxZ ds fy, lsok esa vkj{k.k

dh ckcr tkjh fd, x, vkns”kksa ds v/khu gksxh A

17- foHkkxh; ijh{kk-&&ykxw ugh A

18- f”kfFky djus dh 'kfDr-&&tgka jkT; ljdkj dh ;g jk; gks fd ,slk djuk vko”;d

;k lehphu gS] ogka og] dkj.kksa dks fyf[kr esa vfHkfyf[kr djds] vkns”k }kjk vkSj fgekpy izns”k

yksd lsok vk;ksx ds ijke”kZ ls] bu fu;eksa ds fdUgh micU/k ¼micU/kksa½ dks fdlh oxZ ;k O;fDr

¼O;fDr;ksa½ ds izoxZ ;k in ¼inksa½ dh ckcr] f”kfFky dj ldsxh A

&&&&&&&&&&&

[Authoritative English Text of this Department Notification No. Per (AP.B)B(2)-1/2017 dated 06-

06-2017 as required under clause (3) of article 348 of Constitution of India].

PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT

(Apptt.II)

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 002, the 6^th June, 2017

No. Per (AP.B)B (2)-1/2017.—In exercise of the powers conferred by proviso to article

309 of the Constitution of India, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, is pleased to make the

Recruitment and Promotion Rules for the post of Daftri, Class-IV (Non-Gazetted) in the

Himachal Pradesh Staff Selection Commission, Hamirpur, as per Annexure “A” attached to this

notification, namely:—

1.

Short title and commencement.—(1) These rules may be called the Himachal

Pradesh Staff Selection Commission, Hamirpur, Daftri, Class-IV (Non-Gazetted), Recruitment

and Promotion Rules, 2017.

2036

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

2.

These rules shall come into force from the date of publication in the Rajpatra,

Himachal Pradesh.

By order,

V. C. PHARKA,

Chief Secretary.

______________

ANNEXURE “A”

RECRUITMENT AND PROMOTION RULES FOR THE POST OF DAFTRI, CLASS-IV

(NON-GAZETTED) IN THE HIMACHAL PRADESH STAFF SELECTION

COMMISSION, HAMIRPUR

1.

Name of post.—Daftri

2.

Number of posts.—01 (one)

3.

Classification.—Class-IV (Non-Gazetted)

4.

Scale of pay.—Pay Band `4900-10680 +`1650 Grade Pay

5.

Whether “Selection post” or non- selection post.—Non-Selection

6.

Age for direct recruitment.—Not Applicable

7.

Minimum Educational and other qualifications required for direct recruit(s).—

Not Applicable.

8.

Whether age and educational qualifications prescribed for direct recruits will

apply in the case of the promotee(s).—Age.—Not Applicable.

Educational Qualification.—Not Applicable.

9.

Period of probation, if any.—Not applicable.

10. Method of recruitment whether by direct recruitment or by promotion,

secondment, transfer and the percentage of post(s) to be filled in by various methods.—100

% by promotion.

11. In case of recruitment by promotion/secondment/transfer/grade(s) from which

promotion/secondment/transfer is to be made.—By promotion from amongst the Peons/

Chowkidars / Sweepers possessing 03 years’ regular service or regular combined with continuous

adhoc service rendered, if any, in the grade.

Note.—For the purpose of promotion a combined seniority list of the eligible officials

shall be prepared based on length of service in the respective grade without disturbing their cadre

wise seniority

2037

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

(1) In all cases of promotion, the continuous adhoc service rendered in the feeder post, if

any, prior to regular appointment to the post shall be taken into account towards the length of

service as prescribed in these rules for promotion subject to the condition that the adhoc

appointment/promotion in the feeder category had been made after following proper acceptable

process of selection in accordance with the provisions of R & P Rules :

(i) Provided that in all cases where a junior person becomes eligible for consideration

by virtue of his total length of service (including the service rendered on adhoc basis followed by

regular service/appointment) in the feeder post in view of the provision referred to above, all

persons senior to him/her in the respective category/post/cadre shall be deemed to be eligible for

consideration and placed above the junior person in the field of consideration :

Provided further that all incumbents to be considered for promotion shall possess the

minimum qualifying service of atleast three years or that prescribed in the R & P Rules for the

post, whichever is less :

Provided further that where a person becomes ineligible to be considered for promotion

on account of the requirements of the preceding proviso, the person(s) junior to him shall also be

deemed to be ineligible for consideration for such promotion.

EXPLANATION.—The last proviso shall not render the junior incumbents ineligible

for consideration for promotion if the senior ineligible persons happened to be Ex- servicemen

recruited under the provisions of rule-3 of Demobilized Armed Forces Personnel (Reservation of

Vacancies in Himachal State Non-Technical Services) Rules, 1972 and having been given the

benefit of seniority there under or recruited under the provisions of Rule-3 of Ex- servicemen

(Reservation of Vacancies in the Himachal Pradesh Technical Services) Rules, 1985 and having

been given the benefit of seniority there under.

(ii) Similarly, in all cases of confirmation, continuous adhoc service rendered on the

feeder post, if any, prior to the regular appointment against such post shall be taken into

account towards the length of service, if the adhoc appointment/promotion had been made after

proper selection and in accordance with the provisions of the R & P Rules :

Provided that inter-se-seniority as a result of confirmation after taking into account,

adhoc service rendered as referred to above shall remain unchanged.

12. If a Departmental Promotion Committee exists, what is its composition.—As

may be constituted by the Government from time to time.

13. Circumstances under which the HP Public Service Commission (HPPSC) is to

be consulted in making recruitment.—As required under the law.

14. Essential requirement for direct recruitment.—Not Applicable

15. Selection for appointment to post by direct recruitment.—Not Applicable

16. Reservation.—The appointment to the service shall be subject to orders regarding

reservation in the service for Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes/Other Backward Classes/ Other

categories of persons issued by the Himachal Pradesh Government from time to time.

17. Departmental Examination.—Not Applicable.

2038

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

18. Power to relax.—Where the State Government is of the opinion that it is

necessary or expedient to do so, it may, by order for reasons to be recorded in writing and in

consultation with the Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission, relax any of the

provision(s) of these rules with respect to any class or category of person(s) or post(s).

_____________

In the Court of Arindam Chaudhary, I.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional

Magistrate, Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh

In the matter of :

Karan Dhiman aged 27 years s/o Shri Prittam Chand, r/o Village Lahar, P.O. Dugha, Tehsil

& District Hamirpur (H.P.)

and

Vandana Kumari aged 25 years d/o Shri Dhian Chand, r/o Village Masan Bahal, P.O.

Pansai, Tehsil Nadaun, District Hamirpur (H.P.)

. . Applicants.

Versus

General Public

Subject.— Notice under Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Karan Dhiman and Vandana Kumari have filed an application u/s 16 of Special Marriage

Act, 1954 alongwith affidavit and other supported documents in the court of undersigned in which

they stated that they solemnized marriage on 17-01-2017.

Therefore, the General Public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who

has any objection for this marriage can file the objection personally or in writing before this court

on or before 21-06-17. The objection received after 21-06-17 will not be entertained and marriage

will be registered accordingly.

Issued today on 20-05-2017 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate,

Hamirpur (H.P.).

__________

c vnkyr dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh ,oa rglhynkj] VkS.kh nsoh] ftyk gehjiqj] fg0 iz0

Jh t; flag iq= Jh xksj[k jke] xkao dyksg] Mk0 HkVsM+] rglhy VkS.kh nsoh] ftyk gehjiqj] fg0iz0

cuke

vke turk

fo"k;-&nj[okLr tsj /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969-

2039

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

vfrfjDr ftyk jftLVªkj tUe ,oa e`R;q gehjiqj ds dk;kZy; i= la[;k HFW-HMR(B&D)

2017/6775] fnukad 6&5&2017 vuqlkj Jh t; flag iq= Jh xksj[k jke] xkao dyksg] Mk0 HkVsM+] rglhy

VkS.kh nsoh] ftyk gehjiqj] fg0iz0 dk vkosnu leLr fjdkMZ o 'kiFk i= lfgr bl dk;kZy; esa izkIr gqvk

gS ftlesa mYys[k gS fd mldh ekrk cksgjh nsoh iRuh xksj[k jke dh e`R;q fnukad 1&2&2008 dks gqbZ gS

ijUrq xzke iapk;r HkVsM+ ds fjdkMZ esa mDr e`R;q dk iathdj.k fnukad dks ntZ u djok ldk gS rFkk vc

e`R;q fnukad mijksDr dks xzke iapk;r HkVsM+ esa ntZ djokuk pkgrk gSA vr% bl b'rgkj }kjk vke turk

dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd cksgjh nsoh iRuh Jh xksj[k jke] xkao dyksg] Mk0 HkVsM+] rglhy VkS.kh nsoh]

ftyk gehjiqj] fg0 iz0 dh e`R;q frfFk 1&2&2008 dks xzke iapk;r HkVsM+ ds fjdkMZ esa ntZ djus ckjs fdlh

dks dksbZ mtj@,rjkt gks rks og fnukad 28&06&2017 dks vlkyru@odkyru gkftj vkdj ,rjkt

is'k dj ldrk gSA gkftj u vkus dh lwjr esa ,drjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ tkdj vkxkeh dk;Zokgh

dh tk;sxhA mlds ckn dk mtj tsj lek;r u gksxkA

vkt fnukad 17&5&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvk A

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]

rglhy VkS.kh nsoh] ftyk gehjiqj] fg0 iz0A

&&&&&&&

c vnkyr Jh neksnj nkl] uk;c rglhynkj ,oe~ lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh] cStukFk]

ftyk dkaxM+k fgekpy izns'k

fnukad is'kh % 24&7&2017

jfo dqekj

cuke

j?kqohj flag

fuoklh;ku egky rjsgy] ekStk rjsgy] rglhy cStukFk] ftyk dkaxM+k] fgekpy izns'kA

jfo dqekj us bl vnkyr gtk esa ojk;s ¼rdlhe½ Hkwfe foHkktu gsrq izkFkZuk&i= xqtkjk gSA izkFkhZ

[kkrk ua0 11] [krkSuh ua0 36 ls 38] [kljk uEcjku [kljk fdÙkk 9] jdck rknknh 01&60&34 gS0 egky

rjsgy] ekStk rjsgy] rglhy cStukFk esa Hkw0 ekfyd gSA izkFkhZ bl jdck dh rdlhe djokuk pkgrk gSA

ysfdu dqN fgLlknkju dks lk/kkj.k rjhds ls brykg u gks ik jgh gSA blfy, izkFkhZ izfroknhx.k j?kqohj

flag] fd'kksj yky] jke d`".k] txuukFk iq=ku] vfurk nsoh] iouk nsoh iqf=;k] ';kek nsoh iRuh Lo0 Jh

rqylh jke s/o Pheli Ram, o ujsUnz flag] lqjsUnz flag iq=ku] uh'kk nsoh] ljLorh nsoh iqf=;ka] Le;k nsoh

iRuh Lo0 Jh dsgj flag s/o Pheli Ram o y{e.k nkl s/o [kMdw o jes'k pUn s/o ofp= flag o jes'k

pUn] lqjs'k pUn iq=ku] #ek nsoh iq=h jktks nsoh iRuh Lo0 Jh >ksih jke s/o lqdk jke o gfj jke s/o

lqdk jke o dkyw jke iq= lksok o iSuw iq= ogk# fuoklhx.k rjsgy] dks otfj;k b'rgkj lwfpr fd;k

tkrk gS fd og vlkyru ;k odkyru is'kh frfFk 24&7&2017 ¼ekeyk rdlhe½ esa mifLFkr gksdj

eqdíek dh iSjoh djsa o mtj@,rjkt is'k djsa vU;Fkk muds fo#) ,drjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ

tk,xhA

vkt fnukad 15&5&2017 dks vnkyr dh eksgj o esjs gLrk{kj ds lkFk tkjh gqvkA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh]

cStukFk] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0A

2040

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

c vnkyr Jh neksnj nkl] uk;c rglhynkj ,oe~ lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh] cStukFk]

ftyk dkaxM+k ¼fg0 iz0½

fnukad is'kh % 24&7&2017

jfo dqekj

cuke

xksjh pUn

fuoklh;ku egky rjsgy] ekStk rjsgy] rglhy cStukFk] ftyk dkaxM+k] fgekpy izns'kA

jfo dqekj us bl vnkyr gtk esa ojk;s ¼rdlhe½ Hkwfe foHkktu gsrq izkFkZuk&i= xqtkjk gSA izkFkhZ

[kkrk ua0 9 Min] [krkSuh ua0 31] [kljk uEcjku fdÙkk 6] jdck rknknh 00&48&72 gS0 egky rjsgy]

ekStk rjsgy] rglhy cStukFk esa Hkw0 ekfyd gSA izkFkhZ bl jdck dh rdlhe djokuk pkgrk gSA ysfdu

dqN fgLlknkju dks lk/kkj.k rjhds ls brykg u gks ik jgh gSA blfy, izkFkhZ izfroknhx.k xksjh pUn lqiq=

Dyal Rana s/oAchhar] r/o Trehal dks otfj;k b'rgkj lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd og vlkyru ;k

odkyru is'kh frfFk 24&7&2017 ¼ekeyk rdlhe½ esa mifLFkr gksdj eqdíek dh iSjoh djsa o mtj

,rjkt is'k djsa vU;Fkk muds fo#) ,drjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ tk,xhA

vkt fnukad 15&5&2017 dks vnkyr dh eksgj o esjs gLrk{kj ds lkFk tkjh gqvkA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh]

cStukFk] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0A

&&&&&&&&&

c vnkyr Jh neksnj nkl] uk;c rglhynkj ,oe~ lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh] cStukFk]

ftyk dkaxM+k ¼fg0 iz0½

fnukad is'kh % 24&7&2017

jfo dqekj

cuke

equh"k jke vkfn

fuoklh;ku egky rjsgy] ekStk rjsgy] rglhy cStukFk] ftyk dkaxM+k] fgekpy izns'kA

jfo dqekj us bl vnkyr gtk esa ojk;s ¼rdlhe½ Hkwfe foHkktu gsrq izkFkZuk&i= xqtkjk gSA izkFkhZ

[kkrk ua0 10 Min] [krkSuh ua0 33] [kljk uEcjku fdÙkk 3] jdck rknknh 00&31&58 gS0 egky rjsgy]

ekStk rjsgy] rglhy cStukFk esa Hkw0 ekfyd gSA izkFkhZ bl jdck dh rdlhe djokuk pkgrk gSA ysfdu

dqN fgLlknkju dks lk/kkj.k rjhds ls brykg u gks ik jgh gSA blfy, izkFkhZ izfroknhx.k equh"k jke

2- czge nkl] 3- lqHkk"k pUn iq=ku lju nkl alias Ram Saran] r/o Trehal dks otfj;k b'rgkj lwfpr

fd;k tkrk gS fd og vlkyru ;k odkyru is'kh frfFk 24&7&2017 ¼ekeyk rdlhe½ esa mifLFkr gksdj

eqdíek dh iSjoh djsa o mtj ,rjkt is'k djsa vU;Fkk muds fo#) ,drjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ

tk,xhA

vkt fnukad 15&0&2017 dks vnkyr dh eksgj o esjs gLrk{kj ds lkFk tkjh gqvkA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh]

cStukFk] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0A

2041

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

c vnkyr rglhynkj ,oa lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh] lU/kksy] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½

fely uEcj % 07@2017

rkjh[k et:vk % 12&05&2017 rkjh[k is'kh % 28&06&2017

Jh neksnj nkl iq= Jh Bk.kw jke] fuoklh xkao vIij cSjh] Mkd[kkuk dksBqoka] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½

- - izkFkhZ

cuke

vke turk

- - Qjhdnks;e

v/khu /kkjk 37¼2½ Hkw&jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1954 ds rgr vkosnu i=

Jh neksnj nkl iq= Jh Bk.kw jke] fuoklh xkao vIij cSjh] Mkd[kkuk dksBqoka] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½

}kjk leLr vkSipkfjdrkvksa lfgr bl U;k;ky; esa izLrqr vkosnu i= esa mYys[k fd;k gS fd mldk

okLrfod uke neksnj nkl gS tcfd jktLo vfHkys[k eqgky vIij cSjh esa mldk uke neksnj ntZ gS tks

fd xyr gS blfy, mlus fuosnu fd;k gS fd jktLo vfHkys[k eqgky vIij cSjh eas n:Lrh dh tkdj

mldk uke neksnj mQZ neksnj nkl ntZ fd;k tk,A

vr% blls iwoZ fd ekeyk esa v/khu /kkjk 37¼2½ Hkw&jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1954 ds rgr vkxkeh

vko';d dkjZokbZ vey esa ykbZ tk,] bl uksfVl }kjk tulk/kkj.k dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn

fdlh dks mijksDr ekeyk esa dksbZ mtj@,rjkt gks rks og bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 28&06&2017 dks

izkr% 10-00 cts vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj vkdj viuk mtj@,rjkt is'k dj ldrk gSA vU;Fkk xSj

gktjh dh lwjr esa ,drjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ tk,xhA

vkt fnukad 12&05&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh fd;k x;kA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

lgk;d lekgrkZ] f}rh; Js.kh]

lU/kksy] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½A

&&&&&&&&

c vnkyr rglhynkj ,oa lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh] lU/kksy] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½

fely uEcj % 06@2017

rkjh[k et:vk % 11&05&2017 rkjh[k is'kh % 28&06&2017

Jh f=yksd pUn iq= Lo0 Jh 'ks:] fuoklh xkao HknsgM+] Mkd[kkuk dqTtkcYg] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0iz0½

- - izkFkhZ

cuke

vke turk

- - Qjhdnks;e

v/khu /kkjk 37¼2½ Hkw&jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1954 ds rgr vkosnu i=

Jh f=yksd pUn iq= Lo0 Jh 'ks:] fuoklh xkao HknsgM+] Mkd[kkuk dqTtkcYg] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0iz0½

}kjk leLr vkSipkfjdrkvksa lfgr bl U;k;ky; esa izLrqr vkosnu i= esa mYys[k fd;k gS fd mldk

okLrfod uke f=yksd pUn gS tcfd jktLo vfHkys[k eqgky HknsgM+ esa mldk uke f=yksdh ntZ gS tks fd

2042

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

xyr gS blfy, mlus fuosnu fd;k gS fd jktLo vfHkys[k eqgky HknsgM+ eas n:Lrh dh tkdj mldk

uke f=yksdh mQZ f=yksd pUn ntZ fd;k tk,A

vr% blls iwoZ fd ekeyk esa v/khu /kkjk 37¼2½ Hkw&jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1954 ds rgr vkxkeh

vko';d dkjZokbZ vey esa ykbZ tk,] bl uksfVl }kjk tulk/kkj.k dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn

fdlh dks mijksDr ekeyk esa dksbZ mtj@,rjkt gks rks og bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 28&06&2017 dks

izkr% 10-00 cts vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj vkdj viuk mtj@,rjkt is'k dj ldrk gSA vU;Fkk xSj

gktjh dh lwjr esa ,drjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ tk,xhA

vkt fnukad 11&05&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh fd;k x;kA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

lgk;d lekgrkZ] f}rh; Js.kh]

lU/kksy] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½A

&&&&&&&&

c vnkyr rglhynkj ,oa lgk;d lekgrkZ izFke Js.kh] lU/kksy] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½

fely uEcj % 08@2017

rkjh[k et:vk % 19&05&2017 rkjh[k is'kh % 20&06&2017

Jh eukst dqekj Bkdqj iq= Lo0 Jh usd jke] fu0 xkao o Mkd[kkuk dksBqoka] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½

- - izkFkhZ

cuke

vke turk

- - Qjhdnks;e

v/khu /kkjk 37¼2½ Hkw&jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1954 ds rgr vkosnu i=

Jh eukst dqekj Bkdqj iq= Lo0 Jh usd jke] fu0 xkao o Mkd[kkuk dksBqoka] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½

}kjk leLr vkSipkfjdrkvksa lfgr bl U;k;ky; esa izLrqr vkosnu i= esa mYys[k fd;k gS fd mldk

okLrfod uke eukst dqekj Bkdqj gS tcfd jktLo vfHkys[k eqgky dksBqoka esa mldk uke eukst dqekj

ntZ gS tks fd xyr gS blfy, mlus fuosnu fd;k gS fd jktLo vfHkys[k eqgky lksgj eas n:Lrh dh

tkdj mldk uke eukst dqekj mQZ eukst dqekj Bkdqj ntZ fd;k tk,A

vr% blls iwoZ fd ekeyk esa v/khu /kkjk 37¼2½ Hkw&jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1954 ds rgr vkxkeh

vko';d dkjZokbZ vey esa ykbZ tk,] bl uksfVl }kjk tulk/kkj.k dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn

fdlh dks mijksDr ekeyk esa dksbZ mtj@,rjkt gks rks og bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 20&06&2017 dks

izkr% 10-00 cts vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj vkdj viuk mtj@,rjkt is'k dj ldrk gSA vU;Fkk xSj

gktjh dh lwjr esa ,drjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ tk,xhA

vkt fnukad 19&05&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh fd;k x;kA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

lgk;d lekgrkZ] izFke Js.kh]

lU/kksy] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½A

2043

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

c vnkyr rglhynkj ,oa lgk;d lekgrkZ izFke Js.kh] lU/kksy] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½

fely uEcj % 07@2017

rkjh[k et:vk % 19&05&2017 rkjh[k is'kh % 20&06&2017

Jh d`".k ldykuh iq= Jh ukS[kw] fu0 xkao lksgj] Mkd[kkuk lU/kksy] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½

- - izkFkhZ

cuke

vke turk

- - Qjhdnks;e

v/khu /kkjk 37¼2½ Hkw&jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1954 ds rgr vkosnu i=

Jh d`".k ldykuh iq= Jh ukS[kw] fu0 xkao lksgj] Mkd[kkuk lU/kksy] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½ }kjk

leLr vkSipkfjdrkvksa lfgr bl U;k;ky; esa izLrqr vkosnu i= esa mYys[k fd;k gS fd mldk okLrfod

uke d`".k ldykuh gS tcfd jktLo vfHkys[k eqgky lksgj esa mldk uke d`".k dqekj ntZ gS tks fd

xyr gS blfy, mlus fuosnu fd;k gS fd jktLo vfHkys[k eqgky lksgj eas n:Lrh dh tkdj mldk uke

d`".k dqekj mQZ d`".k ldykuh ntZ fd;k tk,A

vr% blls iwoZ fd ekeyk esa v/khu /kkjk 37¼2½ Hkw&jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1954 ds rgr vkxkeh

vko';d dkjZokbZ vey esa ykbZ tk,] bl uksfVl }kjk tulk/kkj.k dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn

fdlh dks mijksDr ekeyk esa dksbZ mtj@,rjkt gks rks og bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 20&06&2017 dks

izkr% 10-00 cts vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj vkdj viuk mtj@,rjkt is'k dj ldrk gSA vU;Fkk xSj

gktjh dh lwjr esa ,drjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ tk,xhA

vkt fnukad 19&05&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh fd;k x;kA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

lgk;d lekgrkZ] izFke Js.kh]

lU/kksy] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½A

&&&&&&&&

c vnkyr rglhynkj ,oa lgk;d lekgrkZ izFke Js.kh] lU/kksy] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½

fely uEcj % 10@2017

rkjh[k et:vk % 25&05&2017 rkjh[k is'kh % 24&06&2017

Jh jktsUnz dqekj dVoky] fuoklh xkao ?kukyk] Mkd[kkuk lU/kksy] rglhy lU/kksy] ftyk e.Mh

¼fg0 iz0½

- - izkFkhZ

cuke

vke turk

- - Qjhdnks;e

v/khu /kkjk 37¼2½ Hkw&jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1954 ds rgr vkosnu i=

Jh jktsUnz dqekj dVoky] fuoklh xkao ?kukyk] Mkd[kkuk lU/kksy] rglhy lU/kksy] ftyk e.Mh

¼fg0 iz0½ }kjk leLr vkSipkfjdrkvksa lfgr bl U;k;ky; esa izLrqr vkosnu i= esa mYys[k fd;k gS fd

2044

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

mldk okLrfod uke jktsUnz dqekj dVoky gS tcfd jktLo vfHkys[k eqgky ?kukyk esa mldk uke

jkftUnz dqekj ntZ gS tks fd xyr gS blfy, mlus fuosnu fd;k gS fd jktLo vfHkys[k eqgky ?kukyk eas

n:Lrh dh tkdj budk uke jkftUnz dqekj mQZ jktsUnz dqekj dVoky ntZ fd;k tk,A

vr% blls iwoZ fd ekeyk esa v/khu /kkjk 37¼2½ Hkw&jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1954 ds rgr vkxkeh

vko';d dkjZokbZ vey esa ykbZ tk,] bl uksfVl }kjk tulk/kkj.k dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn

fdlh dks mijksDr ekeyk esa dksbZ mtj@,rjkt gks rks og bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 24&06&2017 dks

izkr% 10-00 cts vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj vkdj viuk mtj@,rjkt is'k dj ldrk gSA vU;Fkk xSj

gktjh dh lwjr esa ,drjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ tk,xhA

vkt fnukad 26&05&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh fd;k x;kA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

lgk;d lekgrkZ] izFke Js.kh]

lU/kksy] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½A

&&&&&&&&

c vnkyr rglhynkj ,oa lgk;d lekgrkZ izFke Js.kh] lU/kksy] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½

fely uEcj % 09@2017

rkjh[k et:vk % 25&05&2017 rkjh[k is'kh % 20&06&2017

Jh _f"k jke iq= Lo0 Jh ikyljk] fuoklh xkao y[kjsgM+] Mkd[kkuk dqtkcYg] rglhy lU/kksy]

ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½

- - izkFkhZ

cuke

vke turk

- - Qjhdnks;e

v/khu /kkjk 37¼2½ Hkw&jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1954 ds rgr vkosnu i=

Jh _f"k jke iq= Lo0 Jh ikyljk] fuoklh xkao y[kjsgM+] Mkd[kkuk dqtkcYg] rglhy lU/kksy]

ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½ }kjk leLr vkSipkfjdrkvksa lfgr bl U;k;ky; esa izLrqr vkosnu i= esa mYys[k

fd;k gS fd mldk okLrfod uke _f"k jke gS tcfd jktLo vfHkys[k eqgky Qusgy esa mldk uke fj[kh

jke ntZ gS tks fd xyr gS blfy, bUgksaus fuosnu fd;k gS fd jktLo vfHkys[k eqgky Qusgy eas n:Lrh

dh tkdj budk uke fj[kh jke mQZ _f"k jke ntZ fd;k tk,A

vr% blls iwoZ fd ekeyk esa v/khu /kkjk 37¼2½ Hkw&jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1954 ds rgr vkxkeh

vko';d dkjZokbZ vey esa ykbZ tk,] bl uksfVl }kjk tulk/kkj.k dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn

fdlh dks mijksDr ekeyk esa dksbZ mtj@,rjkt gks rks og bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 20&06&2017 dks

izkr% 10-00 cts vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj vkdj viuk mtj@,rjkt is'k dj ldrk gSA vU;Fkk xSj

gktjh dh lwjr esa ,drjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ tk,xhA

vkt fnukad 26&05&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh fd;k x;kA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

lgk;d lekgrkZ] izFke Js.kh]

lU/kksy] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½A

2045

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar,

District Mandi, H. P.

In the matter of :—

1.

Shri Mukesh Kumar Bhatt s/o Shri Lekh Raj Bhatt, r/o H. No. 82/11 Thanehara

Muhalla Mandi, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi, H.P.

2.

Smt. Ruchika Sharma d/o Sanjay Sharma, r/o RZ-64E Gali No. 9 TKD New Delhi-

110019

. . Applicants.

Versus

General Public

Subject.—Application for the registration of Marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act,

1954.

Shri Mukesh Kumar Bhatt s/o Shri Lekh Raj Bhatt, r/o H. No. 82/11 Thanehara Muhalla

Mandi, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi, H.P. and Smt. Ruchika Sharma d/o Sanjay Sharma, r/o RZ-

64E Gali No. 9 TKD, New Delhi-110 019 (at present wife of Shri Mukesh Kumar Bhatt s/o Shri

Lekh Raj Bhatt, r/o H. No. 82/11 Thanehara Muhalla Mandi, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi, H.P.)

have filed an application along with affidavits in the court of undersigned under section 15 of

Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have solemnized their marriage on 30-09-2014 according to

Hindu rites and customs at Budhi Bherva Temple 7 Mile, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi and they

are living together as husband and wife since then. Hence, their marriage may be registered under

Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who

has any objection regarding this marriage, can file the objection personally or in writing before this

court on or before 27-06-2017 after that no objection will be entertained and marriage will be

registered.

Issued today on 27^th day of May, 2017 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Sadar, District Mandi (H.P.).

_________

In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar,

District Mandi, H. P.

In the matter of :—

1.

Shri Anshuman Soni s/o Ravi Soni, r/o H. No. 150/7 Upper Samkhetar Mandi, Tehsil

Sadar, District Mandi, H.P.

2046

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

2.

Smt. Swati d/o Shiv Karan, r/o H. No. 120/12 Ram Nagar Mandi, District Mandi,

H. P.

. . Applicants.

Versus

General Public

Subject.—Application for the registration of Marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act,

1954.

Shri Anshuman Soni s/o Ravi Soni, r/o H. No. 150/7 Upper Samkhetar Mandi, Tehsil Sadar,

District Mandi, H.P. and Smt. Swati d/o Shiv Karan, r/o H. No. 120/12 Ram Nagar Mandi,

District Mandi, H. P. (at present wife of Shri Anshuman Soni s/o Ravi Soni, r/o H. No. 150/7

Upper Samkhetar Mandi, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi, H.P.) have filed an application along with

affidavits in the court of undersigned under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they

have solemnized their marriage on 28-02-2017 according to Hindu rites and customs at Baniuri

Temple Gohar, Mandi and they are living together as husband and wife since then. Hence, their

marriage may be registered under Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who

has any objection regarding this marriage, can file the objection personally or in writing before this

court on or before 27-06-2017 after that no objection will be entertained and marriage will be

registered.

Issued today on 27^th day of May, 2017 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Sadar, District Mandi (H.P.).

_________

In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar,

District Mandi, H. P.

In the matter of :—

1.

Shri Sanjay Kumar s/o Jai Dev, r/o Village Sadoh, P.O. Baryara, Tehsil Kotli, District

Mandi, H.P.

2.

Smt. Bhintra Devi d/o Hans Raj, r/o Village Chalahar, P. O. Saletar, Tehsil Kotli,

District Mandi, H. P.

. . Applicants.

Versus

General Public

Subject.—Application for the registration of Marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act,

1954.

2047

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

Shri Sanjay Kumar s/o Jai Dev, r/o Village Sadoh, P.O. Baryara, Tehsil Kotli, District

Mandi, H.P. and Smt. Bhintra Devi d/o Hans Raj, r/o Village Chalahar, P. O. Saletar, Tehsil

Kotli, District Mandi, H .P. (at present wife of Shri Sanjay Kumar s/o Jai Dev, r/o Village

Sadoh, P.O. Baryara, Tehsil Kotli, District Mandi, H.P.) have filed an application along with

affidavits in the court of undersigned under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they

have solemnized their marriage on 29-01-2016 according to Hindu rites and customs at their

respective houses and they are living together as husband and wife since then. Hence, their

marriage may be registered under Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who

has any objection regarding this marriage, can file the objection personally or in writing before this

court on or before 27-06-2017 after that no objection will be entertained and marriage will be

registered.

Issued today on 27^th day of May, 2017 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Sadar, District Mandi (H.P.).

_________

c vnkyr Jh vfuy pkSgku] mi&e.Mykf/kdkjh ¼ukxfjd½ pkSiky] rglhy pkSiky]

ftyk f'keyk ¼fgekpy izns'k½

Jh jkek uUn iq= Jh tkyew] xkao 'kUBk] Mkd?kj nsor] xzke iapk;r nsor] rglhy pkSiky] ftyk

f'keyk] fgekpy izns'kA

cuke

¼1½ vke turk]

¼2½ iz/kku xzke iapk;r nsor] rglhy pkSiky] ftyk f'keykA

fo"k;-&&izkFkhZ dh iq=h dk uke o tUe&frfFk xzke iapk;r nsor ds tUe iathdj.k jftLVj esa ntZ djok,

tkus ckjs fd v/khu /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oe~ e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969 ds vUrxZr tUe

iathdj.k djus ckjsA

gj [kkl o vke turk dks ctfj;k b'rgkj lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ Jh jkek uUn us

v/kksgLrk{kjh ds U;k;ky; esa ,d vkosnu&i= izLrqr fd;k gS fd mlus viuh iq=h dk uke o tUe frfFk

xzke iapk;r nsor ds tUe iathdj.k jftLVj esa ntZ ugha djokbZ gSa] vc izkFkhZ viuh iq=h dk uke o tUe

frfFk xzke iapk;r nsor ds tUe iathdj.k jftLVj esa ntZ djokuk pkgrk gS] tks fd fuEu izdkj ls gS %&

uke

lacU/k

tUe frfFk

fiz;k

iq=h

17&04&2002

vr% xzke iapk;r nsor rglhy pkSiky dh turk dks ctfj;k b'rgkj lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd

;fn fdlh O;fDr dks mijksDr tUe iathdj.k ckjs dksbZ vkifÙk gks rks rkjh[k 22&06&2017 dks ;k blls

iwoZ vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj vnkyr vkdj viuh vkifÙk izLrqr djsa vU;Fkk vkosnu&i= ij tUe

iathdj.k vkns'k ikfjr djds lfpo xzke iapk;r nsor dks vkxkeh dk;kZUo;u gsrq Hkst fn;k tk;sxkA

2048

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

vkt fnukad 22&05&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj lfgr vnkyr ls tkjh fd;k x;kA

eksgjA

vfuy pkSgku]

mi&e.Mykf/kdkjh ¼ukxfjd½]

pkSiky] rglhy pkSiky] ftyk f'keyk ¼fg0 iz0½A

&&&&&&&&

c vnkyr Jh eLr jke c?kkbZd] lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh] pkSiky]

ftyk f'keyk] fg0 iz0

Jh lUr jke iq= Jh jktsUnz flag] fuoklh xkao uko.kh] Mk0?k0 iqyckgy] rglhy pkSiky] ftyk

f'keyk] fg0 iz0

cuke

¼1½ vke turk]

¼2½ iz/kku] xzke iapk;r tkox Nejksx] rglhy pkSiky] ftyk f'keykA

fo"k;-&&izkFkhZ ds iq= dk uke o tUe&frfFk xzke iapk;r tkox Nejksx ds tUe iathdj.k jftLVj esa ntZ

djok, tkus ckjs fd v/khu /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oe~ e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969 ds vUrxZr

tUe iathdj.k djus ckjsA

gj [kkl o vke turk dks ctfj;k b'rgkj lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ Jh lUr jke iq= Jh

jktsUnz flag] fuoklh xkao uko.kh] Mk0?k0 iqyckgy] rglhy pkSiky] ftyk f'keyk] fg0 iz0 us v/kksgLrk{kjh

ds U;k;ky; esa ,d vkosnu&i= izLrqr fd;k gS fd mlus vius csVs dk uke o tUe frfFk xzke iapk;r

tkox Nejksx ds tUe iathdj.k jftLVj esa ntZ ugha djok;k gS] vc izkFkhZ vius cPps dk uke o tUe

frfFk xzke iapk;r tkox Nejksx ds tUe iathdj.k jftLVj esa ntZ djokuk pkgrk gS] tks fd bl izdkj

ls gS%&

Øe la[;k

uke

lEcU/k

tUe frfFk

1-

jksfgr dqekj

iq=

15&02&2003

vr% xzke iapk;r tkox Nejksx] rglhy pkSiky dh turk dks ctfj;k b'rgkj lwfpr fd;k

tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh O;fDr dks mijksDr tUe iathdj.k ckjs dksbZ vkifÙk gks rks rkjh[k 11&07&2017

dks ;k blls iwoZ vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj vnkyr vkdj viuh vkifÙk izLrqr djsa vU;Fkk

vkosnu&i= ij tUe iathdj.k vkns'k ikfjr djds lfpo xzke iapk;r tkox Nkejksx dks vkxkeh

dk;kZUo;u gsrq Hkst fn;k tk;sxkA

vkt fnukad 24&05&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj lfgr vnkyr ls tkjh fd;k x;kA

eksgjA

eLr jke c?kkbZd]

lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh]

pkSiky] ftyk f'keyk ¼fg0 iz0½A

2049

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

In the Court of Shri Gian Sagar Negi, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Shimla (R),

District Shimla (H. P.)

Shri Dorjee Tsetan s/o Lt. Shri Kalsang Wangue, r/o House No. 2, MD-36, Tibetan Colony

Panthaghatti, Tehsil & District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.

Versus

[

General Public

. . Respondent.

Whereas Shri Dorjee Tsetan s/o Lt. Shri Kalsang Wangue, r/o House No. 2, MD-36,

Tibetan Colony Panthaghatti, Tehsil & District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh has filed an application

along with affidavit in the court of undersigned under section 13(3) of the Birth & Death

Registration Act, 1969 to enter the date of birth of his son named—Mr. Tanzin Namgyal s/o Shri

Dorjee Tsetan s/o Lt. Shri Kalsang Wangue, r/o House No. 2, MD-36, Tibetan Colony

Panthaghatti, Tehsil & District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh in the record of Secy., Birth and Death,

Municipal Corporation, Shimla.

Sl.

No.

Name of the family member

Relation

Date of Birth

1.

Mr. Tenzin Namgyal

Son

18-10-1984

Hence, this proclamation is issued to the general public if they have any objection/claim

regarding entry of the name & date of birth of above named in the record of Municipal Corporation,

Shimla may file their claims/objections on or before one month of publication of this notice in

Govt. Gazette in this court, failing which necessary orders will be passed.

Issued today on 05-06-2017 under my signature and seal of the court.

Seal.

GIAN SAGAR NEGI,

Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Shimla (R), District Shimla.

__________

In the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Theog, District Shimla, H. P.

Shri Madan Lal s/o Late Shri Sewak Ram, Village Mool Matiana, Gram Panchayat Rouni,

Tehsil Theog, District Shimla, H.P.

. . Applicant.

Versus

The General Public

. . Respondent.

Application under Section 13 (3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969.

Whereas, Shri Madan Lal s/o Late Shri Sewak Ram, Village Mool Matiana, Gram

Panchayat Rouni, Tehsil Theog, District Shimla, H.P. has moved an application stating therein that

2050

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 twu] 2017@18 T;s"B] 1939

he could not register the death of his mother Late Smt. Sumitra w/o Late Shri Sewak Ram Village

Mool Matiana, Gram Panchayat Rouni, Tehsil Theog, District Shimla, H.P. whose date of

Death is 23-04-2017 in the record of Gram Panchayat Rouni (Matiana) Tehsil Theog, and further

stated that in Panchayat record his mother's name was entered as Kanso but her correct name is

Sumitra.

Whereas, by this proclamation, the general public is hereby informed that any person

having any objection for these entries of the above mentioned name may submit his objection in

writing in this court on or before 23-06-2017 failing which no objection will be entertained after

expiry of date.

Given under my hand and seal of the court on this 23^rd day of May, 2017.

Seal.

Sd/-

Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Theog, District Shimla.

fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr

bysDVªkWfud gLrk{kfjr jkti=] oSclkbV http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in ij miyC/k gS ,oe~ vkWuykbu lR;kfir fd;k tk ldrk gS