jkti=] fgekpy izns'k

fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr

eaxyokj] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

fgekpy izns'k ljdkj

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 28^th November, 2016

No.:11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Uttam Chand S/O Shri Nikka Ram,

R/O V.P.O. Aundh, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated nil

received in Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 13-06-2011 regarding his illegal termination

52&jkti=@2017&13&06&2017

¼2085½

2086

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

from the services by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra,

H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.The Labour

Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the

industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation

proceedings, where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act,

1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kangra at

Dharamshala was considered, examined and the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as

appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of about 19 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated

31-08-2013;

And whereas Shri Uttam Chand S/O Shri Nikka Ram agitated the above orders of declining

of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 637/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the CWP on dated 28-03-2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the

petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by the Hon’ble High

Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh State

Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as follows:—

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated

15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial

Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for

legal adjudication:—

“Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Uttam Chand S/O Shri Nikka Ram,

R/O V.P.O. Aundh, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1992 by (i) the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily

wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after about 19 years vide demand

notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 13-06-2011,

without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and

justified? If not, keeping in view delay of about 19 years in raising the industrial dispute,

what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-

worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

2087

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 18^th November, 2016

No.:11-3/93(Lab)ID/2016/Solan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute

exists between Shri Virender Chauhan S/O Shri Ram Singh, Shri Sanjay Verma S/O Shri Rajinder

Verma, Smt. Sushma Chauhan W/O Shri Virender Chauhan through Shri J.C. Bhardwaj, President,

H.P. A.I.T.U.C., HQ: Saproon, District Solan, H.P. and the Managing Director, M/S Marketing &

Processing Corporation Limited, HPMC, Nigam Bihar, Shimla, H.P. and the Deputy General

Manager, M/S Marketing & Processing Corporation Limited, HPMC, Cold Storage, Sector-2,

Parwanoo, District Solan, H.P. on the issue of alleged regularization.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as

per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether the demands raised by Shri Virender Chauhan S/O Shri Ram Singh, Shri Sanjay

Verma S/O Shri Rajinder Verma, Smt. Sushma Chauhan W/O Shri Virender Chauhan

through Shri J.C. Bhardwaj, President, H.P. A.I.T.U.C., HQ: Saproon, District Solan, H.P.

to regularize their services in the Himachal Pradesh Horticulture Produce Marketing and

Processing Corporation Limited, Nigam Vihar, Shimla-2 and granting them pay scales,

allowances, other service benefits corresponding to same or similar category of employees

of the said corporation raised before the Managing Director, M/S Marketing & Processing

Corporation Limited, HPMC, Nigam Bihar, Shimla, H.P. and the Deputy General Manager,

M/S Marketing & Processing Corporation Limited, HPMC, Cold Storage, Sector-2,

Parwanoo, District Solan, H.P. vide demand notice dated nil received in Labour Office

Solan on 05-03-2016 (copy enclosed) are legal and justified? If yes, retrospectively from

which date, what monitory and other service benefits the employees/workers employed in

the above Corporation are entitled to from the above employers/Management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Joint Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 26^th October, 2016

No.:11-1/85(Lab)ID/2013/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Bhupal Singh S/O Shri Pirthi Singh,

R/O V.P.O. Kopra, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated nil

received in Labour Office Dharamshala on 13-06-2011 regarding his illegal termination from the

2088

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

services by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.The Labour Officercum-

Conciliation Officer Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute

amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where

after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour

Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala

was considered, examined and the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as appropriate

Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of

more than 23 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 31-08-2013;

And whereas Shri Bhupal Singh S/O Shri Pirthi Singh agitated the above orders of declining

of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 638/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the CWP on dated 29-03-2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the

petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by the Hon’ble High

Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh State

Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as follows:—

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated

15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial

Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for

legal adjudication:—

“Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Bhupal Singh S/O Shri Pirthi Singh,

R/O V.P.O. Kopra, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during July, 1987 by (i) the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily

wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 23 years vide demand

notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Dharamshala on 13-06-2011, without

complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not,

keeping in view delay of more than 23 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount

of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is

entitled to from the above employers/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

2089

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 26^th October, 2016

No.:11-1/85(Lab)ID/2014/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Chadu Ram S/O Shri Seto Ram, R/O

V.P.O. Aund, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated nil received in

Labour Office Dharamshala on 29-11-2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by

(i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the

ExecutiveEngineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.The Labour Officer-cum-

Conciliation Officer Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute

amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where

after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour

Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala

was considered, examined and the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as appropriate

Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of

more than 21 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 15-12-2014;

And whereas Shri Chadu Ram S/O Shri Seto Ram agitated the above orders of declining of

reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 1068/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the CWP on dated 01-06-2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the

petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30^th December, 2014, delivered by the Hon’ble High

Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh State

Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as follows:—

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated

15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial

Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for

legal adjudication:—

“Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Chadu Ram S/O Shri Seto Ram, R/O

V.P.O. Aund, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990 by (i) the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily wages as

beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 21 years vide demand notice

dated nil received in the office on 29-11-2012, without complying the provisions of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view delay of more

2090

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

than 21 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past

service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above

employers/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 26^th October, 2016

No.:11-1/85(Lab)ID/2013/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Chowkas Ram S/O Shri Bhagat Ram,

R/O V.P.O. Aundh, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated nil

received in Labour Office Dharamshala on 13-06-2011 regarding his illegal termination from the

services by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.The Labour Officer-cum-

Conciliation Officer Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute

amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where

after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour

Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala

was considered, examined and the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as appropriate

Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of

about 21 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 31-08-2013;

And whereas Shri Chowkas Ram S/O Shri Bhagat Ram agitated the above orders of

declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High

Court of Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 925/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal

Pradesh has disposed off the CWP on dated 05-05-2016 and directed the respondents to consider

the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30^th December, 2014, delivered by the

Hon’ble High Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh

State Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as

follows:—

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated

15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial

2091

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial

Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for

legal adjudication:—

“Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Chowkas Ram S/O Shri Bhagat Ram,

R/O V.P.O. Aundh, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990 by (i) the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily

wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after about 21 years vide demand

notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Dharamshala on 13-06-2011, without

complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not,

keeping in view delay of about 21 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of

back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is

entitled to from the above employers/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 22^nd October, 2016

No.:11-5/99(Lab)ID/2016/Chamba.—Whereas

the

Labour

Officer-cum-Conciliation

Officer, Chamba has submitted a report as provided under Section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri Hanif Mohmad, S/O

Shri Noor Deen, R/O Village Thakoli, P.O. Sihunta, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. and the

Executive Engineer/Additional Superintending Engineer, Electrical Division H.P.S.E.B.L.,

Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. as per demand notice dated 10-06-2015 submitted by the said ex-

worker regarding his alleged termination of services.

Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that

during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and

amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts

for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said

dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial

dispute.

Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under subsection-5 of

Section-12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above ex-

worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during January, 1999

before the above employer after delay of more than 16 years and has worked only for 100 and 29

days during the years 1998 and 1999 respectively.

2092

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising

the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-

IV-Loose, Dated 15th February 2014 and as provided in Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble

High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for

adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal

Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue:—

“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Hanif Mohmad, S/O Shri Noor Deen,

R/O Village Thakoli, P.O. Sihunta, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. during

December, 1988 by the Executive Engineer/Additional Superintending Engineer, Electrical

Division H.P.S.E.B.L., Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. who has worked as beldar on daily

wages basis and has raised his industrial dispute vide demand notice dated 27-08-2015 after

delay of more than 27 years, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of working period of 81

days and delay of more than 27 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back

wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to

from the above employer/management? ”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 26^th October, 2016

No.:11-1/85(Lab)ID/2013/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Hans Raj S/O Shri Biro Ram, R/O

V.P.O. Aundh, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated nil received

in Labour Office Dharamshala on 13-06-2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by

(i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.The Labour Officercum-Conciliation

Officer Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the

same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he has sent a

report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala

was considered, examined and the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as appropriate

Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of

more than 25 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 22-08-2013;

And whereas Shri Hans Raj S/O Shri Biro Ram agitated the above orders of declining of

reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 640/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed of the CWP on dated 29-03-2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the

petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30^th December, 2014, delivered by the Hon’ble High

Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh State

Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as follows:—

2093

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated

15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial

Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for

legal adjudication:—

“Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Hans Raj S/O Shri Biro Ram, R/O

V.P.O. Aundh, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during January, 1986 by (i) the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily

wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 25 years vide demand

notice dated nil received in the Labour Office,Dharamshala on 13-06-2011, without

complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not,

keeping in view delay of more than 25 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount

of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is

entitled to from the above employers/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 5^th October, 2016

No.:11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute

exists between Shri Jagdish Singh S/O Shri Pushkar Singh, R/O V.P.O. Kanda, Tehsil Jakholi,

District Rudra Prayag, Uttrakhand and the Employer, M/S Youngman Synthetics, Village Gondpur

Jaichand, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his services from

18-03-2014.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by

the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings

but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per

power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that

this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15^th February, 2014 and as

2094

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether termination of services of Shri Jagdish Singh S/O Shri Pushkar Singh, R/O

V.P.O. Kanda, Tehsil Jakholi, District Rudra Prayag, Uttrakhand w.e.f. 18-03-2014 by the

Employer, M/S Youngman Synthetics, Village Gondpur Jaichand, Tehsil Haroli, District

Una, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is

legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and

compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 7^th October, 2016

No.:11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute exists between Shri Jhomfi Ram S/O Shri Munshi Ram, R/O V.P.O. Chalaharg, Tehsil

Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. and the Executive Engineer, B&R Division, H.P.P.W.D.

Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of alleged time to time termination of his services

during February, 1999 to 31-08-2006.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by

the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings

but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per

power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that

this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as

per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether time to time termination of services of Shri Jhomfi Ram S/O Shri Munshi Ram,

R/O V.P.O. Chalaharg, Tehsil Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. during February, 1999

to 31-08-2006 by the Executive Engineer, B&R Division, H.P.P.W.D. Joginder Nagar,

District Mandi, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act,

2095

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service

benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 26^th October, 2016

No.:11-1/85(Lab)ID/2013/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Om Prakash S/O Shri Sahib Singh,

R/O Village Sadwan, P.O. Sadwan, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand

notice dated nil received in Labour Office Dharamshala on 13-06-2011 regarding his illegal

termination from the services by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District

Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.The

Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the

industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation

proceedings, where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act,

1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala

was considered, examined and the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as appropriate

Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of

about 21 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 22-08-2013;

And whereas Shri Om Prakash S/O Shri Sahib Singh agitated the above orders of declining

of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 1044/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the CWP on dated 24-05-2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the

petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30^th December, 2014, delivered by the Hon’ble High

Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh State

Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as follows:-

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated

15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial

2096

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for

legal adjudication:—

“Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Om Prakash S/O Shri Sahib Singh,

R/O Village Sadwan, P.O. Sadwan, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990

by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked

on daily wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after about 21 years vide

demand notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Dharamshala on 13-06-2011, without

complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not,

keeping in view delay of about 21 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of

back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is

entitled to from the above employers/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 26^th October, 2016

No.:11-1/85(Lab)ID/2013/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Som Lal S/O Shri Pundu Ram, R/O

Village Keyod Garian, P.O. Chowki, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand

notice dated nil received in Labour Office Dharamshala on 13-06-2011 regarding his illegal

termination from the services by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District

Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.The

Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the

industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation

proceedings, where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act,

1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala

was considered, examined and the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as appropriate

Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of

about 21 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 31-08-2013;

And whereas Shri Som Lal S/O Shri Pundu Ram agitated the above orders of declining of

reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 780/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the CWP on dated 07-04-2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the

petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30^th December, 2014, delivered by the Hon’ble High

Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh State

Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as follows:—

2097

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated

15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial

Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for

legal adjudication:—

“Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Som Lal S/O Shri Pundu Ram, R/O

Village Keyod Garian, P.O. Chowki, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990 by (i)

the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily wages as

beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after about 21 years vide demand notice dated nil

received in the Labour Office Dharamshala on 13-06-2011, without complying the provisions of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view delay of about 21

years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits

and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 26^th October, 2016

No.:11-1/85(Lab)ID/2014/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Surinder Kumar S/O Shri Babu Ram,

R/O Village Batka, P.O. Kopra, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice

dated nil received in the office on 13-06-2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by

the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-

Conciliation Officer Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute

amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where

after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour

Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala

was considered, examined and the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as appropriate

Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of

about 21 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 18-11-2014;

2098

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

And whereas Shri Surinder Kumar S/O Shri Babu Ram agitated the above orders of

declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High

Court of Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 1035/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal

Pradesh has disposed off the CWP on dated 19-05-2016 and directed the respondents to consider

the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30^th December, 2014, delivered by the

Hon’ble High Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh

State Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as

follows:—

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated

15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial

Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for

legal adjudication:—

“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Surinder Kumar S/O Shri Babu Ram, R/O

Village Batka, P.O. Kopra, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 01-06-1990 by the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily

wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after about 21 years vide demand

notice dated nil received in the office on 13-06-2011, without complying the provisions of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view delay of

about 21 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past

service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above

employer/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 9th September, 2016

No.: 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2016/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute exists between Shri Abreek S/O Shri Lakha through Shri I.S. Jaryal, General Secretary,

District Committee (AITUC), CHEP Stage-II, Karian P.O. Hardaspura, Tehsil & District Chamba,

H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Chamba Forest Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. on

the issue of alleged time to time termination of his services during April, 2000 to August, 2014 and

finally during August, 2014.

2099

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as

per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether time to time termination of the services of Shri Abreek S/O Shri Lakha through

Shri I.S. Jaryal, General Secretary, District Committee (AITUC), CHEP Stage-II, Karian

P.O. Hardaspura, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. during April, 2000 to August, 2014 and

finally during August, 2014 by the Divisional Forest Officer, Chamba Forest Division,

Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 , is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority,

past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above

employer?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 19th September, 2016

No.: 11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute exists between Shri Ashish Kumar Srivastva S/O Shri Kripa Shankar, R/O V.P.O. Sourut,

Tehsil Indaei, Allahabad, U.P. and (i) the Managing Director, M/S Jagran Prakashan, Jagran

Building, Sarvodyanagar, Kanpur, U.P. (ii) the Chief Executive Officer, M/S Jagran Prakashan

Limited, Plot No. 210, Sector-63, Noida, U.P. (iii) the General Manager, M/S Jagran Prakashan

Limited, Village Banoi, P.O. Bandi, Tehsil Shahpur, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged

termination of his services during February, 2016 and non payment of arrear of wages.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to investigate & settle the dispute during investigation/

conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the

undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the

undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/

Industrial Tribunal.

2100

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15^th February, 2014 and as

per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) read with Section 17(2) of the Working Journalists and Other News Paper Employees

(Condition of Services) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955, this industrial dispute is referred

to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on

the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether termination of services Shri Ashish Kumar Srivastva S/O Shri Kripa Shankar,

R/O V.P.O. Sourut, Tehsil Indaei, Allahabad, U.P. during February, 2016 by (i) the

Managing Director, M/S Jagran Prakashan, Jagran Building, Sarvodyanagar, Kanpur, U.P.

(ii) the Chief Executive Officer, M/S Jagran Prakashan Limited, Plot No. 210, Sector-63,

Noida, U.P. (iii) the General Manager, M/S Jagran Prakashan Limited, Village Banoi, P.O.

Bandi, Tehsil Shahpur, District Kangra, H.P. who has worked with the above employer as

Unit Attendant, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947,

is legal and justified? If not, what relief including reinstatement, amount of back wages,

seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the

above employers/Management?”

“Whether the action of the employers i.e. (i) the Managing Director, M/S Jagran Prakashan,

Jagran Building, Sarvodyanagar, Kanpur, U.P. (ii) the Chief Executive Officer, M/S Jagran

Prakashan Limited, Plot No. 210, Sector-63, Noida, U.P. (iii) the General Manager, M/S

Jagran Prakashan Limited, Village Banoi, P.O. Bandi, Tehsil Shahpur, District Kangra, H.P.

not to pay arrear of wages amounting to Rs. 18,21,820.82/- to Shri Ashish Kumar Srivastva

S/O Shri Kripa Shankar, R/O V.P.O. Sourut, Tehsil Indaei, Allahabad, U.P. as difference of

wages actually drawn and due as per recommendations of the Majithia Wage Boards (copy

of claim enclosed) constituted under Section 9 & 13 (C) of the Working Journalists and

Other News Paper Employees (Condition of Services) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act,

1955 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of relief/arrear, alongwith interest the

aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employers/Management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 19th September, 2016

No.: 11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute exists between Shri Chandra Narayan Shukla S/O Shri Gayatri Prashad Shukla, R/O Village

Budauni (Shuklan), P.O. Atarampur, Jayagadh, Allahabad, U.P. and (i) the Managing Director,

M/S Jagran Prakashan, Jagran Building, Sarvodyanagar, Kanpur, U.P. (ii) the Chief Executive

Officer, M/S Jagran Prakashan Limited, Plot No. 210, Sector-63, Noida, U.P. (iii) the General

Manager, M/S Jagran Prakashan Limited, Village Banoi, P.O. Bandi, Tehsil Shahpur, District

Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his services during February, 2016 and non

payment of arrear of wages.

2101

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to investigate & settle the dispute during

investigation/conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been

considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the

Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the

Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as

per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) read with Section 17(2) of the Working Journalists and Other News Paper Employees

(Condition of Services) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955, this industrial dispute is referred

to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on

the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether termination of services of Shri Chandra Narayan Shukla S/O Shri Gayatri Prashad

Shukla, R/O Village Budauni (Shuklan), P.O. Atarampur, Jayagadh, Allahabad, U.P. during

February, 2016 by (i) the Managing Director, M/S Jagran Prakashan, Jagran Building,

Sarvodyanagar, Kanpur, U.P. (ii) the Chief Executive Officer, M/S Jagran Prakashan

Limited, Plot No. 210, Sector-63, Noida, U.P. (iii) the General Manager, M/S Jagran

Prakashan Limited, Village Banoi, P.O. Bandi, Tehsil Shahpur, District Kangra, H.P. who

has worked with the above employer as Junior Keyboard Operator, without complying with

the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what relief

including reinstatement, amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and

compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employers/Management?”

“Whether the action of the employers i.e. (i) the Managing Director, M/S Jagran Prakashan,

Jagran Building, Sarvodyanagar, Kanpur, U.P. (ii) the Chief Executive Officer, M/S Jagran

Prakashan Limited, Plot No. 210, Sector-63, Noida, U.P. (iii) the General Manager, M/S

Jagran Prakashan Limited, Village Banoi, P.O. Bandi, Tehsil Shahpur, District Kangra, H.P.

not to pay arrear of wages amounting to Rs. 27,59,823/- to Shri Chandra Narayan Shukla

S/O Shri Gayatri Prashad Shukla, R/O Village Budauni (Shuklan), P.O. Atarampur,

Jayagadh, Allahabad, U.P. as difference of wages actually drawn and due as per

recommendations of the Majithia Wage Boards (copy of claim enclosed) constituted under

Section 9 & 13 (C) of the Working Journalists and Other News Paper Employees

(Condition of Services) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 is legal and justified? If

not, what amount of relief/arrear, alongwith interest the aggrieved workman is entitled to

from the above employers/Management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 9th September, 2016

No.: 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2016/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute exists between Shri Daleep Singh S/O Shri Sridhar through Shri I.S. Jaryal, General

Secretary, District Committee (AITUC), CHEP Stage-II, Karian P.O. Hardaspura, Tehsil & District

2102

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

Chamba, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Chamba Forest Division, Chamba, District

Chamba, H.P. on the issue of alleged time to time termination of his services during August, 2009

to July, 2014 and finally during July, 2014.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as

per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether time to time termination of the services of Shri Daleep Singh S/O Shri Sridhar

through Shri I.S. Jaryal, General Secretary, District Committee (AITUC), CHEP Stage-II,

Karian P.O. Hardaspura, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. during August, 2009 to July, 2014

and finally during July, 2014 by the Divisional Forest Officer, Chamba Forest Division,

Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 , is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority,

past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above

employer?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 8th September, 2016

No.: 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Mandi.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation

Officer, Mandi has submitted a report as provided under Section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri Ishwar Dass S/O Shri

Amar Singh, R/O Village Karadwhan, P.O. Chowk, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. and (i)

the Superintending Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. 1st Circle, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. (ii)the Executive

Engineer, B&R Division, H.P.P.W.D. Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. as per demand notice dated

10-06-2015 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding his alleged termination of services.

Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that

during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and

amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts

for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said

dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial

dispute.

2103

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub- section-5

of Section-12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above

ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during February,

1998 before the above employer after delay of more than 17 years and has worked only for 47 and

50 days during the years 1997 and 1998 respectively.

Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising

the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-

IV-Loose, Dated 15th February 2014 and as provided in Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble

High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for

adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal

Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue:—

“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Ishwar Dass S/O Shri Amar Singh,

R/O Village Karadwhan, P.O. Chowk, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. during

February, 1998 by (i) the Superintending Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. 1st Circle, Mandi, District

Mandi, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, B&R Division, H.P.P.W.D. Sarkaghat, District

Mandi, H.P. who has worked as beldar on daily wages basis only for 47 and 50 days during

the years 1997 and 1998 respectively and has raised his industrial dispute vide demand

notice dated 10-06-2015 after delay of more than 17 years, without complying with the

provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view

of working period stated above and delay of more than 17 years in raising the industrial

dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the

above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers/management? ”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 19th September, 2016

No.: 11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute exists between Shri Kapil Dev S/O Shri Mohar Singh, R/O Village Ansoli, P.O. Nadhehar,

Tehsil & District Kangra, H.P. and (i) the Managing Director, M/S Jagran Prakashan, Jagran

Building, Sarvodyanagar, Kanpur, U.P. (ii) the Chief Executive Officer, M/S Jagran Prakashan

Limited, Plot No. 210, Sector-63, Noida, U.P. (iii) the General Manager, M/S Jagran Prakashan

Limited, Village Banoi, P.O. Bandi, Tehsil Shahpur, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged

termination of his services during February, 2016 and non payment of arrear of wages.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to investigate & settle the dispute during investigation/

conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the

undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the

undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/

Industrial Tribunal.

2104

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as

per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) read with Section 17(2) of the Working Journalists and Other News Paper Employees

(Condition of Services) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955, this industrial dispute is referred

to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on

the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether termination of services of Shri Kapil Dev S/O Shri Mohar Singh, R/O Village

Ansoli, P.O. Nadhehar, Tehsil & District Kangra, H .P. during February, 2016 by (i) the

Managing Director, M/S Jagran Prakashan, Jagran Building, Sarvodyanagar, Kanpur, U.P.

(ii) the Chief Executive Officer, M/S Jagran Prakashan Limited, Plot No. 210, Sector-63,

Noida, U.P. (iii) the General Manager, M/S Jagran Prakashan Limited, Village Banoi, P.O.

Bandi, Tehsil Shahpur, District Kangra, H.P. who has worked with the above employer as

Junior Keyboard Operator, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what relief including reinstatement, amount of back

wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to

from the above employers/Management?”

“Whether the action of the employers i.e. (i) the Managing Director, M/S Jagran Prakashan,

Jagran Building, Sarvodyanagar, Kanpur, U.P. (ii) the Chief Executive Officer, M/S Jagran

Prakashan Limited, Plot No. 210, Sector-63, Noida, U.P. (iii) the General Manager, M/S

Jagran Prakashan Limited, Village Banoi, P.O. Bandi, Tehsil Shahpur, District Kangra, H.P.

not to pay arrear of wages amounting to Rs. 17,69,579.40/- to Shri Kapil Dev S/O Shri

Mohar Singh, R/O Village Ansoli, P.O. Nadhehar, Tehsil & District Kangra, H.P. as

difference of wages actually drawn and due as per recommendations of the Majithia Wage

Boards (copy of claim enclosed) constituted under Section 9 & 13 (C) of the Working

Journalists and Other News Paper Employees (Condition of Services) and Miscellaneous

Provisions Act, 1955 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of relief/arrear, alongwith

interest the aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employers/Management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 19th September, 2016

No.: 11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute exists between Shri Mritunjaya Kumar Jha S/O Late Shri Sudhir Kumar Jha, R/O Village

Patuaha, Tehsil Kahara, District Saharasa, Bihar and (i) the Managing Director, M/S Jagran

Prakashan, Jagran Building, Sarvodyanagar, Kanpur, U.P. (ii) the Chief Executive Officer, M/S

Jagran Prakashan Limited, Plot No. 210, Sector-63, Noida, U.P. (iii) the General Manager, M/S

Jagran Prakashan Limited, Village Banoi, P.O. Bandi, Tehsil Shahpur, District Kangra, H.P. on the

issue of alleged termination of his services during February, 2016 and non payment of arrear of

wages.

2105

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to investigate & settle the dispute during

investigation/conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been

considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the

Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the

Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as

per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) read with Section 17(2) of the Working Journalists and Other News Paper Employees

(Condition of Services) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 this industrial dispute is referred to

the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the

following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether termination of services of Shri Mritunjaya Kumar Jha S/O Late Shri Sudhir

Kumar Jha, R/O Village Patuaha, Tehsil Kahara, District Saharasa, Bihar during February,

2016 by (i) the Managing Director, M/S Jagran Prakashan, Jagran Building, Sarvodyanagar,

Kanpur, U.P. (ii) the Chief Executive Officer, M/S Jagran Prakashan Limited, Plot No. 210,

Sector-63, Noida, U.P. (iii) the General Manager, M/S Jagran Prakashan Limited, Village

Banoi, P.O. Bandi, Tehsil Shahpur, District Kangra, H.P. who has worked with the above

employer as Unit Attendant, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what relief including reinstatement,

amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker

is entitled to from the above employers/Management?”

“Whether the action of the employers i.e. (i) the Managing Director, M/S Jagran Prakashan,

Jagran Building, Sarvodyanagar, Kanpur, U.P. (ii) the Chief Executive Officer, M/S Jagran

Prakashan Limited, Plot No. 210, Sector-63, Noida, U.P. (iii) the General Manager, M/S

Jagran Prakashan Limited, Village Banoi, P.O. Bandi, Tehsil Shahpur, District Kangra, H.P.

not to pay arrear of wages amounting to Rs. 18,61,412.91/- to Shri Mritunjaya Kumar Jha

S/O Late Shri Sudhir Kumar Jha, R/O Village Patuaha, Tehsil Kahara, District Saharasa,

Bihar as difference of wages actually drawn and due as per recommendations of the

Majithia Wage Boards (copy of claim enclosed) constituted under Section 9 & 13 (C) of the

Working Journalists and Other News Paper Employees (Condition of Services) and

Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of

relief/arrear, alongwith interest the aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above

employers/Management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 19th September, 2016

No.: 11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute exists between Shri Mukesh Kumar S/O Shri Sanjay Kumar Yadav, R/O V.P.O. Diwari,

P.O. Sonbarasa Kachiyari, District Saharasa, Bihar and (i) the Managing Director, M/S Jagran

2106

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

Prakashan, Jagran Building, Sarvodyanagar, Kanpur, U.P. (ii) the Chief Executive Officer, M/S

Jagran Prakashan Limited, Plot No. 210, Sector-63, Noida, U.P. (iii) the General Manager, M/S

Jagran Prakashan Limited, Village Banoi, P.O. Bandi, Tehsil Shahpur, District Kangra, H.P. on the

issue of alleged termination of his services during February, 2016 and non payment of arrear of

wages.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to investigate & settle the dispute during

investigation/conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been

considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the

Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the

Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as

per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) read with Section 17(2) of the Working Journalists and Other News Paper Employees

(Condition of Services) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 this industrial dispute is referred to

the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the

following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether termination of services of Shri Mukesh Kumar S/O Shri Sanjay Kumar Yadav,

R/O V.P.O. Diwari, P.O. Sonbarasa Kachiyari, District Saharasa, Bihar during February,

2016 by (i) the Managing Director, M/S Jagran Prakashan, Jagran Building, Sarvodyanagar,

Kanpur, U.P. (ii) the Chief Executive Officer, M/S Jagran Prakashan Limited, Plot No. 210,

Sector-63, Noida, U.P. (iii) the General Manager, M/S Jagran Prakashan Limited, Village

Banoi, P.O. Bandi, Tehsil Shahpur, District Kangra, H.P. who has worked with the above

employer as Unit Attendant, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what relief including reinstatement,

amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker

is entitled to from the above employers/Management?”

“Whether the action of the employers i.e. (i) the Managing Director, M/S Jagran Prakashan,

Jagran Building, Sarvodyanagar, Kanpur, U.P. (ii) the Chief Executive Officer, M/S Jagran

Prakashan Limited, Plot No. 210, Sector-63, Noida, U.P. (iii) the General Manager, M/S

Jagran Prakashan Limited, Village Banoi, P.O. Bandi, Tehsil Shahpur, District Kangra, H.P.

not to pay arrear of wages amounting to Rs. 18,41,887.55/- to Shri Mukesh Kumar S/O Shri

Sanjay Kumar Yadav, R/O V.P.O. Diwari, P.O. Sonbarasa Kachiyari, District Saharasa,

Bihar as difference of wages actually drawn and due as per recommendations of the

Majithia Wage Boards (copy of claim enclosed) constituted under Section 9 & 13 (C) of the

Working Journalists and Other News Paper Employees (Condition of Services) and

Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of

relief/arrear, alongwith interest the aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above

employers/Management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

2107

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

'kgjh fodkl foHkkx

vf/klwpuk

f'keyk&2] 8 twu] -2017

la[;k ;w0Mh0,0¼1½&4@2016-&&fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky] fgekpy izns'k uxjikfydk fuokZpu

fu;e] 2015 ds fu;e 90 ds mi fu;e ¼6½ ds lkFk ifBr fgekpy izns'k uxjikfydk vf/kfu;e]

1994 ¼1994 dk vf/kfu;e la[;kad 13½ dh /kkjk 27 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs

gq,] ftyk e.Mh esa uxj iapk;r ljdk?kkV dh ckcr v/;{k vkSj mik/;{k ds fuokZpu dks fuEu izdkj

ls jkti= es vf/klwfpr djrs gSa%&&

uxj ikfydk ifj"kn~@uxj

iapk;r dk uke

fuokZfpr v/;{k dk

uke vkSj irk

fuokZfpr mik/;{k dk

uke o irk

uxj iapk;r ljdk?kkV

Jh lanhi] dqukykx okMZ u0 5

ljdkÄkV] rglhy ljdkÄkV]

ftyk e.Mh fg0iz0

Jhefr ljkst dqekjh rkrhg]

okMZ u0 1 ljdkÄkV rglhy

ljdkÄkV] ftyk e.Mh fg0iz0

vkns'k }kjk]

vkj0 Mh0 Ëkheku]

iz/kkku lfpo ¼'kgjh fodkl½A

&&&&&&&&&&

[Authoritative English Text of notification No.UD-A(1)-4/2016, dated 08-06-2017 as required under

clause(3) of article 348 of the Constitution of India.]

URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 8^th June, 2017

No.UD-A (1)-4/2016.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section

27 of the Himachal Pradesh Municipal Act, 1994 (Act No.13 of 1994) read with sub- rule (6) of

rule 90 of the Himachal Pradesh Municipal Election Rules, 2015, the Governor of Himachal

Pradesh is pleased to notify in the Official Gazette election of President and Vice-President in

respect of Nagar Panchayat, Sarkaghat in District Mandi, as under:—

Name of Municipal

Council/Nagar Panchayat

Name & Address of

Elected President

Name & Address of

Elected Vice-President.

Nagar Panchayat Sarkaghat

Sh. Sandeep, Kunalag Ward

No.

5

Sarkaghat

Tehsil

Sarkaghat Distt. Mandi HP.

Smt. Saroj Kumari, Tatih,

Ward

No.

1,

Sarkaghat

Tehsil

Sarkaghat

Distt.

Mandi HP.

By order,

R. D. DHIMAN,

Principal Secretary (UD).

2108

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

'kgjh fodkl foHkkx

vf/klwpuk

f'keyk&2] 8 twu] 2017

la[;k% ;w0 Mh0&,0 ¼1½ 8@2005-&&fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky] fgekpy izns'k uxjikfydk

vf/kfu;e] 1994 ¼1994 dk vf/kfu;e la[;kad 13½ dh /kkjk 5 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa

dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph&ÞdÞ esa fofufnZ’V LFkkuh; {ks=ksa dks

uxjikfydk ifj"kn] ?kqekjoha esa lfEefyr djus dk izLrko djrs gSaA mDr LFkkuh; {ks=ksa dks lfEefyr

fd, tkus ls laHkkO; izHkkfor gksus okys fdlh@fdUgh fgrc) O;fDr@O;fDr;ksa dks ;fn, bl

vf/klwpuk dh ckcr dksbZ vk{ksi ;k lq>ko gS@gSa rks og@os mls@mUgs bl vf/klwpuk ds jkti=]

fgekpy izns'k esa izdk'ku dh rkjh[k ls Ng lIrkg ds Hkhrj] mik;qDr] fcykliqj ds ek/;e ls

iz/kku lfpo ¼'kgjh fodkl½] fgekpy izns'k ljdkj dks Hkst ldsxk@Hkst ldsaxsA

mijksDr fu;r vof/k ds Hkhrj izkIr vk{ksi ;k lq>ko, ;fn dksbZ gksa] ij izk:i vf/klwpuk dks

vafre :Ik nsus ls iwoZ ljdkj }kjk fopkj fd;k tk,xkA

vkns'k }kjk]

vkj0 Mh0 /kheku]

iz/kku lfpo ¼'kgjh fodkl½A

&&&&&&&&&&&

vuqlwph& ‘d’

Ukxjikfydk ifj"kn] ?kqekjoha dh lhekvksa esa lfEefyr fd, tkus okys {ks=

Øe

la[;k

eksgky

[kljk uEcj

{ks=

ohÄk&foLok

1

yqgkjoh

gnoLr

uEcj 440

276/148, 277/148, 308/149, 309/149, 280/150,

281/150, 282/150, 189, 212/1, 222, 223, 224,

225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232,

310/233, 311/233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238,

239, 240, 241, 334/242, 335/242, 336/243,

337/243, 296/244, 304/297, 312/305/244,

313/305/244, 314/305/244, 315/305/244, 321/

305/244, 322/305/244, 338/323/316/244, 339/

323/

316/244,

340/323/316/244,

341/323/

316/244, 342/323/316/244, 343/323/316/244,

344/323/ 316/244, 298/245, 299/245, 246, 247,

248, 317/249, 318/249

84&17

fdrs&56 dqy {ks= 84&17 ohÄk

Øe

la[;k

eksgky

[kljk uEcj

{ks=

2

flgy

gnoLr

uEcj 433

109, 112, 113, 114, 144, 201, 202, 203, 221,

222, 223, 225, 226, 330/227, 331/227, 228

23&03

fdrs&16 dqy {ks= 23&03 ohÄk

2109

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

[Authoritative English Text of the Government Notification No. UD-A(1)8/2005 dated 08-06-2017

as required under clause (3) of article 348 of the Constitution of India.]

URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 8^th June, 2017

No. UD-A(1)8/2005.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section

5 of the Himachal Pradesh Municipal Act, 1994 (Act No. 13 of 1994), the Governor,

Himachal Pradesh is pleased to propose to include within the Municipal Council, Ghumarwin,

the local areas specified in Schedule “A”, annexed to this Notification.

If any interested person who is likely to be affected by the inclusion of the said local

areas and has any objection or suggestion with regard to this Notification, he/she may send the same

to the Principal Secretary (Urban Development) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh through

the Deputy Commissioner, Bilaspur within six weeks from the date of publication of the

Notification in the Rajpatra, Himachal Pradesh.

The objection or suggestion, if any, received within the above stipulated period shall

be taken into consideration by the Government before finalizing the draft notification.

By order,

R. D. DHIMAN,

Principal Secretary (UD).

___________

Schedule-‘A’

Inclusion of areas in the limits of Municipal Council, Ghumarwin

Sr.

No.

Mohal

Khasra No.

Area Bigha-

Biswa

1.

Luharwin

hadbast

No.440

276/148, 277/148, 308/149,

309/149, 280/150, 281/150,

282/150, 189, 212/1, 222, 223, 224,

225, 226, 227,

228, 229, 230, 231, 232,

310/233, 311/233, 234,235,

236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241,

334/242, 335/242,

336/243, 337/243, 296/244,

304/297, 312/305/244,

313/305/244,

314/305/244,

315/305/244,

321/305/244, 322/305/244,

84—17

2110

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

338/323/316/244, 339/323/316/244,

340/323/316/244, 341/323/316/244,

342/323/316/244, 343/323/316/244,

344/323/316/244, 298/245, 299/245, 246,

247, 248, 317/249, 318/249

Kitte-56 Total Area 84—17 Bighas

Sr.

No.

Mohal

Khasra No.

Area

2.

Sihal Hadbast

No. 433

109, 112, 113, 114, 144, 201,

202, 203, 221, 222, 223, 225, 226,

330/227, 331/227, 228

23—03

Kitte – 16

Total Area 23—03 Bighas

_________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA – 171001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla the 30^th May, 2017

No. HHC/Admn.6 (23)/74-XVI.—Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice in exercise of the

powers vested in him under Rule 2 (32) of Chapter 1 of H.P. Financial Rules, 2009 has been

pleased to declare Civil Judge-cum-JMIC-II, Dehra, H.P. as Drawing and Disbursing Officer, in

respect of the Court of Senior Civil Judge-cum-ACJM, Dehra and also the Controlling Officer for

the purpose of salary, T.A. etc. in respect of establishment attached to the aforesaid Court during

the earned leave period of Sh. Surya Parkash, Sr. Civil Judge-cum-ACJM, Dehra w.e.f. 31.5.2017

to 9.6.2017 with permission to suffix Second Saturday and Sunday falling on 10.6.2017 and

11.6.2017 or till he returns from leave.

By order,

Sd/-

Registrar General.

____________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA - 171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla the 1^st June, 2017

No. HHC/Admn.6 (23)/74-XVI.—Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice in exercise of the

powers vested in him under Rule 2(32) of Chapter 1 of H.P. Financial Rules, 2009, has been

pleased to declare the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Chamba as Drawing and Disbursing

Officer in respect of the Court of District and Sessions Judge, Chamba and also the Controlling

2111

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

Officer for the purpose of T.A. etc. in respect of class-II, III and IV establishment attached to the

aforesaid court under head “2014–Administration of Justice” during the earned leave period of Sh.

Yogesh Jaswal, District and Sessions Judge, Chamba, HP w.e.f. 27.06.2017 to 07.07.2017 with

permission to prefix Sunday and Gazetted holiday falling on 25.06.2017 & 26.06.2017 and suffix

Second Saturday and Sunday falling on 08.07.2017 and 09.07.2017 or till he returns from earned

leave.

By order,

Sd/-

Registrar General.

____________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA - 171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla the 31^st May, 2017

No. HHC/Estt.3(406)/95-I.— 06 days commuted leave (without production of Medical

Certificate) on and w.e.f. 01.06.2017 to 06.06.2017, is hereby sanctioned, in favour of Shri Gopal

Swaroop Kaushal, Secretary of this Registry.

Certified that Shri Gopal Swaroop Kaushal is likely to join the same post and at the same

station from where he proceeds on leave after the expiry of the above leave period.

Certified that Shri Gopal Swaroop Kaushal would have continued to officiate the same post

of Secretary but for his proceeding on leave.

By order,

Sd/-

Registrar General.

____________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA - 171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla the 31^st May, 2017

No. HHC/ Estt.3(516)/2001-I.—4 days earned leave w.e.f. 24.5.2017 to 27.5.2017 with

permission to suffix Sunday on 28.5.2017 is hereby sanctioned, ex-postfacto, in favour of Shri

Tilak Raj Sharma, Court Master of this Registry.

Certified that Shri Tilak Raj Sharma has joined the same post and at the same station from

where he had proceeded on leave after the expiry of the above leave period.

Certified that Shri Tilak Raj Sharma would have continued to officiate the same post of

Court Master but for his proceeding on leave.

By order,

Sd/-

Registrar General.

2112

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA - 171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla the 31^st May, 2017

No.HHC/Admn.3(391)/94-I.—5 days earned leave on and with effect from 5.6.2017 to

9.6.2017 with permission to prefix Sunday falling on 4.6.2017 and suffix second Saturday and

Sunday falling on 10th & 11th June, 2017 is hereby sanctioned in favour of Shri Anil Kumar

Sharma, Secretary of this Registry.

Certified that Shri Anil Kumar Sharma is likely to join the same post and at the same station

from where he proceeds on leave after the expiry of the above leave period.

Certified that Shri Anil Kumar Sharma would have continued to officiate the same post of

Secretary but for his proceeding on leave.

By order,

Sd/-

Registrar General.

____________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA - 171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 31^st May, 2017

No. HHC/Admn.3(398)/95-I.—5 days earned leave on and with effect from 5.6.2017 to

9.6.2017 with permission to prefix Sunday falling on 4.6.2017 and suffix second Saturday and

Sunday falling on 10th & 11th June, 2017 is hereby sanctioned in favour of Shri M. L.Gandhi,

Secretary of this Registry.

Certified that Shri M. L.Gandhi is likely to join the same post and at the same station from

where he proceeds on leave after the expiry of the above leave period.

Certified that Shri M. L.Gandhi would have continued to officiate the same post of

Secretary but for his proceeding on leave.

By order,

Sd/-

Registrar General.

2113

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA - 171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 31^st May, 2017

No.HHC/ Admn.3(242)/86-I.—5 days earned leave on and with effect from 5.6.2017 to

9.6.2017 with permission to prefix Sunday falling on 4.6.2017 and suffix second Saturday and

Sunday falling on 10th & 11th June, 2017 is hereby sanctioned in favour of Shri O.P.Sharma, Court

Master of this Registry.

Certified that Shri O. P. Sharma is likely to join the same post and at the same station from

where he proceeds on leave after the expiry of the above leave period.

Certified that Shri O. P. Sharma would have continued to officiate the same post of Court

Master but for his proceeding on leave.

By order,

Sd/-

Registrar General.

____________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA-171001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 7^th June, 2017

No. HHC/GAZ/14-231/97-I.—Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant

07 days earned leave w.e.f. 07.06.2017 to 13.06.2017 in favour of Shri Ajay Mehta, Additional

District and Sessions Judge, Hamirpur, H.P.

Certified that Shri Ajay Mehta is likely to join the same post and at the same station from

where she proceeds on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.

Also certified that Shri Ajay Mehta would have continued to hold the post of Additional

District and Sessions Judge, Hamirpur, H.P., but for his proceeding on leave for the above period.

By order,

Sd/-

Registrar General.

____________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA – 171001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 7^th June, 2017

No. HHC/Admn.6 (23)/74-XVI.—Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice in exercise of the

powers vested in him under Rule 2 (32) of Chapter 1 of H.P. Financial Rules, 2009 has been

2114

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

pleased to declare Senior Civil Judge-cum-CJM, Hamirpur, H.P. as Drawing and Disbursing

Officer, in respect of the Courts of District & Sessions Judge and Additional District & Sessions

Judge, Hamirpur and also the Controlling Officer for the purpose of salary, T.A. etc. in respect of

establishments attached to the aforesaid Courts during leave period of Shri Ajay Mehta, Additional

District and Sessions Judge, Hamirpur w.e.f. 7.6.2017 to 13.6.2017 or till he returns from leave.

By order,

Sd/-

Registrar General.

____________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA – 171001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 7^th June, 2017

No. HHC/Admn.6 (23)/74-XVI.—Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice in exercise of the

powers vested in him under Rule 2 (32) of Chapter 1 of H.P. Financial Rules, 2009 has been

pleased to declare Senior Civil Judge-cum-ACJM, Nurpur, H.P. as Drawing and Disbursing

Officer, in respect of the Court of Civil Judge-cum-JMIC, Jawali, H.P. and also the Controlling

Officer for the purpose of salary, T.A. etc. in respect of establishment attached to the aforesaid

Court with immediate effect till Sh. Nikhil Aggarwal, Civil Judge-cum-JMIC, Jawali joins his duty.

By order,

Sd/-

Registrar General.

____________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 7^th June, 2017

No. HHC/GAZ/ 14-255/2002-I.—Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to

grant ex-post facto sanction of 03 days commuted leave w.e.f. 04.05.2017 to 06.05.2017 in favour

of Smt. Kanta Verma, Senior Civil Judge-cum-CJM, L&S at Kullu, H.P.

Certified that Smt. Kanta Verma has joined the same post and at the same station from

where she proceeded on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.

2115

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

Also certified that Smt. Kanta Verma would have continued to hold the post of Senior Civil

Judge-cum-CJM, L&S at Kullu, H.P., but for her proceeding on leave for the above period.

By order,

Sd/-

Registrar General.

___________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA - 171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 6^th June, 2017

No. HHC/Admn.16 (20)75-II.—Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice, in exercise of the

powers vested in him U/S 139(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, U/S 297 (1) (b) of the Code

of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Rule 5(vi) of the H.P. Oath Commissioners(Appointment &

Control) Rules, 2007 has been pleased to appoint Sh. Subhash Chand and Sh. Sumeet Singh,

Advocates, Ghumarwin as Oath Commissioners at Ghumarwin for a period of two years with

immediate effect for administering oaths and affirmations on affidavits to the deponents under the

aforesaid Codes and Rules.

By order,

Sd/-

Registrar General.

____________

HIMACHAL PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, SHIMLA

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 6^th June, 2017

No. HPERC/438.—WHEREAS the Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission

(hereinafter referred as “the Commission”) notified the Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory

Commission (Renewable Power Purchase Obligation and its Compliance) Regulations, 2010,

which were published in the Rajpatra, Himachal Pradesh, dated 29th May, 2010 (hereinafter

referred as “the RPPO Regulations, 2010”); The long term RPO trajectory has been fixed vide 1st

amendment Regulations dated 10th October.

AND WHEREAS the Commission amended aforesaid Regulations vide the Himachal

Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission(Renewable Power Purchase Obligation and its

Compliance)(Third Amendment) Regulations, 2016, published vide Notification dated 24th March,

2017 in the Rajpatra, Himachal Pradesh, dated 27th March, 2017 revising the Long Term trajectory

2116

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

of Renewable Purchase Obligations and providing that energy purchased from all the hydel sources

of energy is to be excluded while determining the quantum of energy on which the RPPO targets of

the obligated entities shall be worked out.

AND WHEREAS certain obligated entities have represented to the Commission that since

the amendment revising the RPPO targets of financial year 2016-17 was notified towards the closer

of the financial year, they did not get adequate opportunity to procure renewable power or

Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) to meet their enhanced obligations and are unable to credit

for excess renewable power or RECs by way of adjustment in the ensuing year, in certain cases

where the revised RPPO targets are lesser than those as per the pre-revised trajectory and the

quantum of renewable energy or RECs already procured by them have been rendered surplus to

their requirement for meeting the obligations for FY 2016-17.

NOW, THEREFORE in exercise of the powers conferred under Regulations 9, 11, 12 and

13 of the Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (Renewable Power Purchase

Obligations and its Compliance) Regulations, 2010, the Commission proposes to issue the

following Order detailing with regard to the implementation and compliance of the Renewable

Power Purchase Obligations by the obligated entities in FY 2016-17 and FY 2017-18 and notice is

hereby given that the said draft order will be taken into consideration after the expiry of twenty one

(21) days from the date of notification to gather with any objections or suggestions which may

within the aforesaid period in respect thereof. The text of the aforesaid draft order is also available

on the website of the Commission i.e. www.hperc.org.

Any person who intends to make suggestions or objections may submit the same to the

Secretary, Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, Vidyut Aayog Bhawan, Block

No.-37, SDA Complex, Kasumpti, Shimla-171009(HP), E-mail: [email protected]).

Suggestions and objections can be submitted in English and should carry the full name, postal

address and e-mail address, if any, of the sender.

DRAFT ORDER

1.

Short title and commencement.—(1)This Order may be called the Himachal Pradesh

Electricity Regulatory Commission (Adjustment of Surplus/Shortfall of Renewable Energy

Certificates or Renewable Energy with respect to Renewable Purchase Obligation of FY 2016-17 in

FY 2017-18) Order, 2017.

(2) This Order shall come into force from the date of its publication in the Rajpatra,

Himachal Pradesh.

2.

Adjustment of surpluses or deficits.—Renewable Power Purchase Obligations

(RPPO) compliance for FY 2016-17. Notwithstanding anything in the procedures, practices,

directions relating to the monitoring the implementation and compliance of the RPPOs, surpluses or

deficits in the compliance of RPPOs for FY 2016-17, which could not be adjusted or complied by

the obligated entity, as the case may be, till 31st March, 2017, the obligated entities may adjust or

comply surpluses or deficits occurred consequent to the revision of RPPO targets under the

2117

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Renewable Power Purchase

Obligation and its Compliance) (Third Amendment) Regulations, 2017, in the financial year

2017-18.

Place: Shimla.

By order of the Commission,

Date: 06-06-2017.

By order,

(CHAMAN DILTA),

Secretary.

___________

INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT

A-Section

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 12^th June, 2017

No. Ind.-A(B)1-2/2011.—The Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to order

transfer/posting of following Managers DIC (Class-II, Gazetted), with immediate effect, in public

interest:—

Sl.

No.

Name of Manager

Present place of posting

New place of posting

1.

Sh. Surinder Singh

Distt. Industries Centre,

Solan

Single

Window

Clearance

Agency, Parwanoo, Distt. Solan

as Member Secretary.

2.

Sh. Raj Kumar

Rana

Single Window Clearance

Agency, Parwanoo, Distt.

Solan

Distt. Industries Centre, Mandi

3.

Sh. Nitin Sharma

Newly appointed

District Industries Centre, Una

4.

Sh. Nitin Gupta

Newly appointed

District Industries Centre, Solan.

5.

Sh. Somesh Sharma

Newly appointed

Single

Window

Clearance

Agency, Baddi, Distt. Solan.

The above officers are directed to report for duty at their new place of posting, within

07 days and submit joining report to this Department as well as to the Director of Industries

immediately.

By order,

Sd/-

Addl. Chief Secretary (Inds.).

2118

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 13 twu] 2017@23 T;s"B] 1939

CHANGE OF NAME

I, Surbhi Wadhwa alias Surbhi alias Surbhi Vikas Mehra w/o Shri Vikas Kumar and

daughter of Shri Daya Nand Wadhwa, r/o Jharoli Mohalla, VPO Jawali, Tehsil Jawali, Distt.

Kangra, Himachal Pradesh have changed my name to Surbhi.

Surbhi Vikas Mehra w/o Shri Vikas Kumar

and daughter of Shri Daya Nand Wadhwa,

r/o Jharoli Mohalla, VPO Jawali,

Tehsil Jawali, Distt. Kangra,

Himachal Pradesh.

fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr

bysDVªkWfud gLrk{kfjr jkti=] oSclkbV http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in ij miyC/k gS ,oe~ vkWuykbu lR;kfir fd;k tk ldrk gS