jkti=] fgekpy izns'k
fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr
'kfuokj] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
fgekpy izns'k ljdkj
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA - 171 001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 5th June, 2017
No.HHC/Admn.16 (13)74-VIII.—Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice, in exercise of the
powers vested in him U/S 139(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, U/S 297(1) (b) of the Code
of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Rule 5 (vi) of the H.P. Oath Commissioners (Appointment &
55&jkti=@2017&17&06&2017
¼2181½
2182
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
Control) Rules, 2007 has been pleased to appoint Sh. Sandeep Kumar and Ms. Shilpa Kumari,
Advocates, Shimla as Oath Commissioners at District Courts at Chakkar, Shimla for a period of
two years with immediate effect for administering oaths and affirmations on affidavits to the
deponents under the aforesaid Codes and Rules.
By order,
Sd/-
Registrar General.
_________
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA - 171 001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 5th June, 2017
No. HHC/Admn.16 (13)74-VIII.— Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice, in exercise of the
powers vested in him U/S 139(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, U/S 297(1) (b) of the Code
of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Rule 5(vi) of the H.P. Oath Commissioners (Appointment &
Control) Rules, 2007 has been pleased to appoint Ms. Neha Thakur, Advocate, Shimla as Oath
Commissioner at District Courts at Chakkar, Shimla for a period of two years with immediate
effect for administering oaths and affirmations on affidavits to the deponents under the aforesaid
Codes and Rules.
By order,
Sd/-
Registrar General.
_________
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA - 171 001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 5th June, 2017
No.HHC/Admn.16 (13)74-VIII.—Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice, in exercise of the
powers vested in him U/S 139(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, U/S 297(1) (b) of the Code
of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Rule 5(vi) of the H.P. Oath Commissioners (Appointment &
Control) Rules, 2007 has been pleased to appoint Sh. Varun Kant, Sh. Kirti Singh Thakur and Sh.
Rajeev Sharma, Advocates, Shimla as Oath Commissioners at District Courts at Chakkar, Shimla
for a period of two years with immediate effect for administering oaths and affirmations on
affidavits to the deponents under the aforesaid Codes and Rules.
By order,
Sd/-
Registrar General.
2183
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA - 171 001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 3rd June, 2017
No.HHC/Admn.3(384)/93-I.—20 days earned leave on and with effect from 05.06.2017 to
24.06.2017, with permission to prefix Sunday falling on 04.06.2017 and suffix Sunday and
Gazetted Holiday falling on 25.06.2017 and 26.06.2017, is hereby sanctioned, in favour of Shri J.K.
Sharma, Assistant Registrar of this Registry.
Certified that Shri J.K. Sharma is likely to join the same post and at the same station from
where he proceeds on leave after the expiry of the above leave period.
Certified that Shri J.K. Sharma would have continued to officiate the same post of Assistant
Registrar but for his proceeding on leave.
By order,
Sd/-
Registrar General.
_________
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA - 171 001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 5th June, 2017
No.HHC/Estt.3(510)/2000-I.—7 days earned leave on and with effect from 3.6.2017 to
9.6.2017 with permission to suffix second Saturday and Sunday falling on 10th & 11th June, 2017
is hereby sanctioned in favour of Shri Tarun Mahajan, Secretary of this Registry.
Certified that Shri Tarun Mahajan is likely to join the same post and at the same station
from where he proceeds on leave after the expiry of the above leave period.
Certified that Shri Tarun Mahajan would have continued to officiate the same post of
Secretary but for his proceeding on leave.
By order,
Sd/-
Registrar General.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 21st March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Hans Raj S/O Shri Trilok Chand, R/O
Village and Post Office Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated 5.4.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,
2184
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,
but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent
a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,
H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 26.03.2014;
And whereas Shri Hans Raj S/O Shri Trilok Chand agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 197/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 24.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case
of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014, CWP No. 9467 of 2014
case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight
weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Hans Raj S/O Shri Trilok Chand, R/O
Village and Post Office Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004
by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District
Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial
dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 05.04.2012, without complying
the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in
view of delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back
wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above exworker is entitled to
from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
2185
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 21st March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Bhagwan Chand S/O Shri Gian
Chand, R/O Village Kuffa, P.O. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated 9.5.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,
but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent
a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,
H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 09.05.2014;
And whereas Shri Bhagwan Chand S/O Shri Gian Chand agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 197/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 24.02.2016 and directed the respondents to
consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014, CWP No.
9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others
within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Bhagwan Chand S/O Shri Gian Chand,
R/O Village Kuffa, P.O. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September,
2004 by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District
Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial
dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 09.05.2012, without complying
the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in
view of delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back
wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above exworker is entitled to
from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
2186
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Hari Singh S/O Shri Gian Chand,
R/O Village and Post Office Kothi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated-nilreceived in Labour Office, Chamba on 31.10.2011 regarding his illegal termination from
the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District
Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried
to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of
conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 6 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 21.01.2013;
And whereas Shri Hari Singh S/O Shri Gian Chand agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4846/2015. The Hon’ble Division Bench, High Court of
Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 31.12.2015 and directed the Labour
Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six
weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned order in the writ
petition and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ
petition is disposed of, as indicated above, alongwith all pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Hari Singh S/O Shri Gian Chand, R/O
Village and Post Office Kothi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during October, 2005 by
the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P.,
who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more
than 6 years vide demand notice dated-nil-received on 31.10.2011, without complying the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view
of delay of more than 6 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above exworker is entitled to from the
above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
2187
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Pan Dei W/O Shri Sham Singh, R/O
Village and Post Office Kothi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated-nilreceived in Labour Office, Chamba on 31.10.2011 regarding her illegal termination from
the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District
Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried
to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of
conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
about 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 14.01.2013;
And whereas Smt. Pan Dei W/O Shri Sham Singh agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4846/2015. The Hon’ble Division Bench, High Court of
Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 31.12.2015 and directed the Labour
Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six
weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned order in the writ
petition and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ
petition is disposed of, as indicated above, alongwith all pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Pan Dei W/O Shri Sham Singh, R/O
Village and Post Office Kothi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004
by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba,
H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised her industrial dispute after
about 7 years vide demand notice dated-nil-received on 31.10.2011, without complying the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view
of delay of about 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above exworker is entitled to from the
above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
2188
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Hari Singh S/O Shri Mahesh Chand,
R/O Village and Post Office Kothi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated-nilreceived in Labour Office, Chamba on 31.10.2011 regarding his illegal termination from
the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District
Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried
to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of
conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
after about 6 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 16.01.2013;
And whereas Shri Hari Singh S/O Shri Mahesh Chand agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4846/2015. The Hon’ble Division Bench, High Court
of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 31.12.2015 and directed the Labour
Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six
weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned order in the writ
petition and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ
petition is disposed of, as indicated above, alongwith all pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Hari Singh S/O Shri Mahesh Chand, R/O
Village and Post Office Kothi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2005
by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba,
H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after
about 6 years vide demand notice dated-nil-received on 31.10.2011, without complying the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view
of delay of about 6 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the
above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
2189
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Ram Kumar S/O Shri Shiv Lal, R/O
Village Chaloli, P.O. Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated 26.12.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,
but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent
a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,
H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 11 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 9.10.2014;
And whereas Shri Ram Kumar S/O Shri Shiv Lal agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4846/2015. The Hon’ble Division Bench, High Court of
Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 31.12.2015 and directed the Labour
Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six
weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned order in the writ
petition and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ
petition is disposed of, as indicated above, alongwith all pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Ram Kumar S/O Shri Shiv Lal, R/O
Village Chaloli, P.O. Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during October, 2000
by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba,
H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages for 29 days during year, 1990, 9 days
during year, 1993 and 30 days during year, 2000 respectively and has raised his industrial
dispute after more than 11 years vide demand notice dated 26.12.2011, without complying
the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in
view of working period of 29 days during year, 1990, 9 days during year, 1993 and 30 days
during year, 2000 respectively and delay of more than 11 years in raising the industrial
dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
2190
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Prem Raj S/O Shri Budhi Ram, R/O
Village Bisthow, P.O. Luj, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated19.12.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,
but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent
a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,
H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 14 and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated
12.11.2014;
And whereas Shri Prem Raj S/O Shri Budhi Ram agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4846/2015. The Hon’ble Division Bench, High Court of
Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 31.12.2015 and directed the Labour
Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six
weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned order in the writ
petition and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ
petition is disposed of, as indicated above, alongwith all pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Prem Raj S/O Shri Budhi Ram, R/O
Village Bisthow, P.O. Luj, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during July, 1997 by the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P., who
had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 14
years vide demand notice dated 19.12.2011, without complying the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more
than 14 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
2191
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Janno Devi W/O Shri Chain Lal, R/O
Village and Post Office Luj, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated
23.12.2011 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./
H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,
but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent
a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,
H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
about 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 14.01.2013;
And whereas Smt. Janno Devi W/O Shri Chain Lal agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4846/2015. The Hon’ble Division Bench, High Court of
Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 31.12.2015 and directed the Labour
Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six
weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned order in the writ
petition and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ
petition is disposed of, as indicated above, alongwith all pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Janno Devi W/O Shri Chain Lal, R/O
Village and Post Office Luj, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004
by the Executive Engineer, I.P.H. /H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District
Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised her industrial
dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 23.12.2011, without complying
the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in
view of delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back
wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to
from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
2192
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016
No. 11-2/86(Lab) ID/2015-Bilaspur.—Whereas Shri Hem Singh S/O Shri Jindu Ram, R/O
Village Rathoha, P.O. Chunahan, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated 12.9.2014 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Senior Executive
Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B. Limited, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, H.P. The Labour
Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, H.P. tried to settle the industrial
dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings,
where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour
Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Bilaspur,
District Bilaspur, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 18 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order
dated 7.12.2015;
And whereas Shri Hem Singh S/O Shri Jindu Ram agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 189/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 25.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case
of the petitioner, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 delivered by Hon’ble High
Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State
Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced
as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions is disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Hem Singh S/O Shri Jindu Ram, R/O
Village Rathoha, P.O. Chunahan, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H.P. during November, 1992
by the Senior Executive Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B. Limited, Bilaspur,
District Bilaspur, H.P., who had worked on daily wages only for 187 days in year, 1992 and
has raised his industrial dispute after more than 21 years vide demand notice dated
12.09.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal
and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period of 187 days in year, 1992 and delay
of more than 21 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages,
2193
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the
above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 20th March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Jagdish Kumar S/O Shri Ram Lal,
R/O Village Findru, P.O. Sach, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated 23.1.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,
I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,
but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent
a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,
H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 8 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 10.12.2013;
And whereas Shri Jagdish Kumar S/O Shri Ram Lal agitated the above orders of declining
of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4396/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 21.11.2015 and directed the respondent to make reference to
the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within four weeks. The operative part of the judgment is
reproduced as follows;
“4 Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. Annexure PB dated 10.12.2013 is quashed and
set aside. The Labour Commissioner is directed to make reference to the Labour Court-
cum-Industrial Tribunal within a period of four weeks from today and the Labour Court-
cum-Industrial Tribunal shall decide the same within a period of six months after the
receipt of reference. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Jagdish Kumar S/O Shri Ram
Lal, R/O Village Findru, P.O. Sach, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. before the
2194
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba,
H.P. vide demand notice dated 23.1.2012 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service
during June, 2003 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the
services of Shri Jagdish Kumar S/O Shri Ram Lal, R/O Village Findru, P.O. Sach, Tehsil
Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division,
Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during June, 2003 without complying the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved
workman is entitled to from the above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 20th March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Jagdish Kumar S/O Shri Ram Lal,
R/O Village Findru, P.O. Sach, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated 23.1.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,
I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officercum-
Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,
but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent
a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,
H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 8 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 10.12.2013;
And whereas Shri Jagdish Kumar S/O Shri Ram Lal agitated the above orders of declining
of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4396/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 21.11.2015 and directed the respondent to make reference to
the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within four weeks. The operative part of the judgment is
reproduced as follows;
“4 Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. Annexure PB dated 10.12.2013 is quashed and
set aside. The Labour Commissioner is directed to make reference to the Labour Court-
cum-Industrial Tribunal within a period of four weeks from today and the Labour Court-
cum-Industrial Tribunal shall decide the same within a period of six months after the
receipt of reference. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs.”
2195
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Jagdish Kumar S/O Shri Ram Lal,
R/O Village Findru, P.O. Sach, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. before the Executive
Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. vide
demand notice dated 23.1.2012 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during
June, 2003 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of
Shri Jagdish Kumar S/O Shri Ram Lal, R/O Village Findru, P.O. Sach, Tehsil Pangi,
District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar,
Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during June, 2003 without complying the provisions of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled
to from the above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Kamal Raj S/O Shri Khem Chand,
R/O Village Chapanu, P.O. Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a
demand notice dated 30.4.2010 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour
Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute
amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where
after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour
Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi
District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 9 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 29.3.2012;
And whereas Shri Kamal Raj S/O Shri Khem Chand agitated the above orders of declining
of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4310/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 16.11.2015 and directed the respondents to consider the case
2196
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014 case titled Pratap Chand
versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being the lead case within eight weeks.
The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petition are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending application, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Kamal Raj S/O Shri Khem Chand,
R/O Village Chapanu, P.O. Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. before the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi,
H.P. vide demand notice dated 30.4.2010 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service
during year, 2000 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the
services of Shri Kamal Raj S/O Shri Khem Chand, R/O Village Chapanu, P.O. Dharampur,
Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division,
Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. during year, 2000 without complying
the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what
amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above
aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 27th February, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Khem Raj S/O Shri Gulab Chand,
R/O Village Findpar, P.O. Mindhal, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated 6.1.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,
Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,
but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent
a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,
H.P.;
2197
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 6.5.2014;
And whereas Shri Khem Raj S/O Shri Gulab Chand agitated the above orders of declining
of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4507/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to
make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part
of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned order in the writ
petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ
petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Khem Raj S/O Shri Gulab Chand,
R/O Village Findpar, P.O. Mindhal, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. before the
Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba,
H.P. vide demand notice dated 6.1.2012 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service
during May, 2004 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the
services of Shri Khem Raj S/O Shri Gulab Chand, R/O Village Findpar, P.O. Mindhal,
Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division,
H.P.P.W.D., Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during May, 2004 without
complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not,
what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above
aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016
No. 11-1/7(Lab) ID/2015-Joginder Nagar.—Whereas Shri Khem Singh S/O Shri Tek
Chand, R/O Village Badwahan, P.O. Urla, Tehsil Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated 27.12.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Senior Executive
2198
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B. Limited, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. The
Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the
industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation
proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Joginder
Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 13 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order
dated 3.12.2013;
And whereas Shri Khem Singh S/O Shri Tek Chand agitated the above orders of declining
of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 116/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case
of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by Hon’ble High
Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State
Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced
as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Khem Singh S/O Shri Tek Chand, R/O
Village Badwahan, P.O. Urla, Tehsil Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 25.03.1999 by the
Senior Executive Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B. Limited, Joginder Nagar,
District Mandi, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages only for 78 days during
year, 1998-99 and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 13 years vide demand
notice dated 27.12.2012, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period of 78 days during
year, 1998-99 and delay of more than 13 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount
of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
2199
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Kishan Dei W/O Shri Uggar Chand,
R/O Village Findpar, P.O. Mindhal, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated 6.1.2012 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the Executive
Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour
Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial
dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings,
where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour
Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order
dated 1.10.2015;
And whereas Smt. Kishan Dei W/O Shri Uggar Chand agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 130/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to
consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014, delivered
by the Hon’ble High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014- titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal
Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment
is reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Kishan Dei W/O Shri Uggar Chand, R/O
Village Findpar, P.O. Mindhal, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004
by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District
Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised her industrial
dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 06.01.2012, without complying
the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in
view of delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back
2200
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to
from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 11th March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Kishnu S/O Shri Faqueeru R/O
Village Baida, P.O. Tarella, Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated
05.05.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, Killar
Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,
but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent
a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,
H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 6 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 14.02.2013;
And whereas Shri Kishnu S/O Shri Faqueeru agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 2920/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 02.07.2015 and directed the respondents to consider the case
of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014 case titled Pratap Chand
versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being the lead case within eight weeks.
The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petition are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending application, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
2201
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Kishnu S/O Shri Faqueeru R/O
Village Baida, P.O. Tarella, Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, H.P. before the Executive
Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. vide
demand notice dated 5.5.2011 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during
September, 2004 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services
of Shri Kishnu S/O Shri Faqueeru R/O Village Baida, P.O. Tarella, Tehsil Churah, District
Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar, Tehsil Pangi,
District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004 without complying the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled
to from the above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 20th March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Krishni W/O Shri Vijay Kumar, R/O
Village and Post Office Punto, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated 2.6.2012 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,
I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,
but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent
a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,
H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 10.12.2013;
And whereas Smt. Krishni W/O Shri Vijay Kumar agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4397/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 21.11.2015 and directed the respondent to make reference to
the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within four weeks. The operative part of the judgment is
reproduced as follows;
“4 Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. Annexure PB dated 10.12.2013 is quashed and
set aside. The Labour Commissioner is directed to make reference to the Labour Court-
cum-Industrial Tribunal within a period of four weeks from today and the Labour Court-
cum-Industrial Tribunal shall decide the same within a period of six months after the
receipt of reference. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs.”
2202
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Smt. Krishni W/O Shri Vijay Kumar,
R/O Village and Post Office Punto, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. before the
Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba,
H.P. vide demand notice dated 2.6.2012 regarding her alleged illegal termination of service
during September, 2004 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the
services of Smt. Krishni W/O Shri Vijay Kumar, R/O Village and Post Office Punto, Tehsil
Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division,
Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004 without complying the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved
workman is entitled to from the above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Lal Dei W/O Shri Jagdish Chand,
R/O Village Karel, P.O. Ponto, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated 06.10.2011 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,
but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent
a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,
H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 30.03.2013;
And whereas Smt. Lal Dei W/O Shri Jagdish Chand agitated the above orders of declining
of reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 128/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case
of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 in CWP No. 9467 of 2014
case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight
weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
2203
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Lal Dei W/O Shri Jagdish Chand, R/O
Village Karel, P.O. Ponto, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004 by
the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba,
H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised her industrial dispute after
more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 06.10.2011, without complying the provisions
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of delay
of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority,
past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 16th February, 2016
No. 11-1/7(Lab) ID/2015-Joginder Nagar.—Whereas Shri Manohar Lal S/O Shri Nanak
Chand, R/O Village Jhajar Kukain, P.O. Bradta, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a
demand notice dated 13.3.2014 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive
Engineer, B&R Division H.P.P.W.D., Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Inspector-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute
amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where
after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour
Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Joginder
Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of after more than 12 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide
order dated 31.3.2015;
2204
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
And whereas Shri Manohar Lal S/O Shri Nanak Chand agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 3284/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 30.7.2015 and directed the respondents to
consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014 case titled
Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being the lead case
within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petition are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending application, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Manohar Lal S/O Shri Nanak
Chand, R/O Village Jhajar Kukain, P.O. Bradta, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. before the
Executive Engineer, B&R Division H.P.P.W.D., Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. vide demand
notice dated 13.3.2014 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during December, 2001
suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Manohar Lal
S/O Shri Nanak Chand, R/O Village Jhajar Kukain, P.O. Bradta, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi,
H.P. by the Executive Engineer, B&R Division H.P.P.W.D., Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P.
during December, 2001 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is
legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 17th February, 2016
No. 11-1/7(Lab) ID/2015-Joginder Nagar.—Whereas Shri Manoj Kumar S/O Shri Ishwar
Singh, R/O Village Dhakrera, P.O. Jalpehar, Tehsil Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. had raised
a demand notice dated 01.10.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the
Resident Engineer, H.P.S.E.B. Bassi Power House, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. The
2205
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the
industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation
proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Inspector-cum- Conciliation Officer, Joginder
Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 13 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order
dated 4.9.2013;
And whereas Shri Manoj Kumar S/O Shri Ishwar Singh agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 166/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 24.02.2016 and directed the respondents to
consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014, delivered
by Hon’ble High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus
Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the
judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Manoj Kumar S/O Shri Ishwar Singh,
R/O Village Dhakrera, P.O. Jalpehar, Tehsil Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f.
26.12.1996 by the Resident Engineer, H.P.S.E.B. Bassi Power House, Joginder Nagar,
District Mandi, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial
dispute after more than 14 years vide demand notice dated 01.10.2011, without complying
the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in
view of delay of more than 14 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back
wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above exworker is entitled to
from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
2206
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 20th February, 2016
No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2015-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Meda Ram S/O Shri Chokash Ram,
R/O Village and Post Office Jalgran, Tehsil Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated 11.06.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by (1) The Principal
Chief Conservator of Forest, Forest Department, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla (2) The Divisional
Forest Officer, Forest Division, Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute
amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where
after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour
Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala,
District Kangra, H.P. was considered and examined and Labour Commissioner as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 5 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 04.03.2013;
And whereas Shri Meda Ram S/O Shri Chokash Ram agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4523/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed of the C.W.P. on 3.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to refer the
dispute of the above workman to the Ld. Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal within four weeks.
The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as follows;
“5 Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. Annexure PF dated 4.3.2013 is quashed and
set aside. The Labour Commissioner is directed to make a reference to the Labour Court-
cum-Industrial Tribunal within a period of four weeks from today and Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal shall decide the same within a period of six months after the receipt of
reference. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Meda Ram S/O Shri Chokash Ram, R/O
Village and Post Office Jalgran, Tehsil Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P. employed as daily
wage worker in the Indo German Changer Project, Palampur, District Kangra, H.P.,
managed by the H.P. Eco Development Society, on the completion of project w.e.f.
31.03.2006 by the (1) The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Forest Department,
Himachal Pradesh, Shimla (2) Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division, Palampur, District
2207
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
Kangra, H.P. without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal
and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
In the Court of Shri H. S. Rana, H.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate
Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh
NOTICE UNDER SECTION 16 OF SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT, 1954
In the matter of :
1.
Shri Yogesh Kumar s/o Shri Telu Ram, r/o Village Amboya, Tehsil Paonta Sahib,
District Sirmaur, H.P.
2.
Smt. Pritika d/o Shri Ram Lal, r/o Village Sataun, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District
Sirmaur, H.P.
Versus
General Public
Application for the registration of Marriage under Section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954
(Central Act) as amended by Marriage Laws (Amendment Act 01, 49 of 2001)
Shri Yogesh Kumar s/o Shri Telu Ram, r/o Village Amboya, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District
Sirmaur, H.P and Smt. Pritika d/o Shri Ram Lal, r/o Village Sataun, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District
Sirmaur, H.P have filed an application alongwith affidavits in this court under section 16 of Special
Marriage Act, 1954 on dated 19-05-2017 stating therein that they have been solemnized their
marriage on 15-02-2017 at their residence Village Amboya, Tehsil Paonta Sahib and they have
living together as husband and wife ever since then. Hence notices are given to all concerend and
general public to this effect that if any body have any objection regarding the registration of
marriage duly solemnized on 15-02-2017 between Shri Yogesh Kumar s/o Shri Telu Ram, r/o
Village Amboya, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, HP and Smt. Pritika d/o Shri Ram Lal, r/o
Village Sataun, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, HP he should file written objections and
appear personally or through an authorized agent before this court within 30 days from the date of
issue of this notice. After expiry of the said period, the marriage certificate would be issued to the
applicants by this court.
Issued under my hand and office seal of this court on 19-05-2017.
Seal.
HARI SINGH RANA (HAS),
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur.
2208
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
In the Court of Shri H. S. Rana, H.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate
Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh
NOTICE UNDER SECTION 16 OF SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT, 1954
In the matter of :
1.
Shri Gopi Chand s/o Shri Ramesh Chand, r/o Village Shankoli, Tehsil Shillai, District
Sirmaur, H.P.
2.
Smt. Priyanka Sharma d/o Shri Ramesh Chand, r/o Village Guddi Manpur, Sub-Tehsil
Kamrau, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P.
Versus
General Public
Application for the registration of Marriage under Section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954
(Central Act) as amended by Marriage Laws (Amendment Act 01, 49 of 2001)
Shri Gopi Chand s/o Shri Ramesh Chand, r/o Village Shankoli, Tehsil Shillai, District
Sirmaur, HP and Smt. Priyanka Sharma d/o Shri Ramesh Chand, r/o Village Guddi Manpur, Sub-
Tehsil Kamrau, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, HP have filed an application alongwith
affidavits in this court under section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 on dated 27-05-2017 stating
therein that they have solemnized their marriage on 04-12-2016 at their residence Village Shankoli,
Tehsil Shillai and they have been living together as husband and wife ever since then. Hence
notices are given to all concerend and general public to this effect that if any body have any
objection regarding the registration of marriage duly solemnized on 04-12-2016 between Shri Gopi
Chand s/o Shri Ramesh Chand, r/o Village Shankoli, Tehsil Shillai, District Sirmaur, HP and
Smt. Priyanka Sharma d/o Shri Ramesh Chand, r/o Village Guddi Manpur, Sub-Tehsil Kamrau,
Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, HP he should file written objections and appear personally or
through an authorized agent before this court within 30 days from the date of issue of this notice.
After expiry of the said period, the marriage certificate would be issued to the applicants by this
court.
Issued under my hand and office seal of this court on 27-05-2017.
Seal.
HARI SINGH RANA (HAS),
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur.
2209
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
In the Court of Shri H. S. Rana, H.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate
Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh
NOTICE UNDER SECTION 16 OF SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT, 1954
In the matter of :
1.
Shri Surjit Singh s/o Shri Nirmal Singh, r/o Kashmiri Colony, Guru Nanak Enclave
Indira Gandhi Colony, Dehradun Uttarakhand.
2.
Smt. Virender Kaur Rathour d/o Shri Tirlok Singh, r/o House No. 169 SAS Colony,
Ward No. 7, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P.
Versus
General Public
Application for the registration of Marriage under Section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954
(Central Act) as amended by Marriage Laws (Amendment Act 01, 49 of 2001)
Shri Surjit Singh s/o Shri Nirmal Singh, r/o Kashmiri Colony, Guru Nanak Enclave Indira
Gandhi Colony Dehradun Uttarakhand and Smt. Virender Kaur Rathour d/o Shri Tirlok Singh, r/o
House No. 169 SAS Colony, Ward No. 7, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, HP have filed an
application alongwith affidavits in this court under section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 on
dated 26-05-2017 stating therein that they have solemnized their marriage on 24-05-2017 at their
residence Paonta Sahib and they have been living together as husband and wife ever since then.
Hence notices are given to all concerend and general public to this effect that if any body have any
objection regarding the registration of marriage duly solemnized on 24-05-2017 between Shri Surjit
Singh s/o Shri Nirmal Singh, r/o Kashmiri Colony, Guru Nanak Enclave Indira Gandhi Colony
Dehradun Uttarakhand and Smt. Virender Kaur Rathour d/o Shri Tirlok Singh, r/o House No. 169
SAS Colony, Ward No. 7, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, HP he should file written objections and
appear personally or through an authorized agent before this court within 30 days from the date of
issue of this notice. After expiry of the said period, the marriage certificate would be issued to the
applicants by this court.
Issued under my hand and office seal of this court on 26-05-2017.
Seal.
HARI SINGH RANA (HAS),
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur.
_________
In the Court of Shri H. S. Rana, H.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate
Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh
NOTICE UNDER SECTION 16 OF SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT, 1954
In the matter of :
1.
Shri Sandeep s/o Shri Darshan, r/o Village Amboya, PO Rajpur, Tehsil Paonta Sahib,
District Sirmaur, HP
2210
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
2.
Smt. Kashish Kumari d/o Shri Rakesh Kumar, r/o House No. 587 Baseda Khamchand
PS and Tehsil Dhampur, District Bijnor, UP
Versus
General Public
Application for the registration of Marriage under Section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954
(Central Act) as amended by Marriage Laws (Amendment Act 01, 49 of 2001)
Shri Sandeep s/o Shri Darshan, r/o Village Amboya, PO Rajpur, Tehsil Paonta Sahib,
District Sirmaur, HP and Smt. Kashish Kumari d/o Shri Rakesh Kumar, r/o House No. 587 Baseda
Khamchand PS and Tehsil Dhampur, District Bijnor, UP have filed an application alongwith
affidavits in this court under section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 on dated 29-05-2017 stating
therein that they have solemnized their marriage on 27-05-2017 at their residence Paonta Sahib and
they have been living together as husband and wife ever since then. Hence notices are given to all
concerend and general public to this effect that if any body have any objection regarding the
registration of marriage duly solemnized on 27-05-2017 between Shri Sandeep s/o Shri Darshan,
r/o Village Amboya, PO Rajpur, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, HP and Smt. Kashish
Kumari d/o Shri Rakesh Kumar, r/o House No. 587 Baseda Khamchand PS and Tehsil Dhampur,
District Bijnor, UP he should file written objections and appear personally or through an authorized
agent before this court within 30 days from the date of issue of this notice. After expiry of the said
period, the marriage certificate would be issued to the applicants by this court.
Issued under my hand and office seal of this court on 29-05-2017.
Seal.
HARI SINGH RANA (HAS),
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur.
__________
c vnkyr Jh fgjk flag flej] dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh] rglhy ukSgjk/kkj]
ftyk fljekSj ¼fg0 iz0½
Jherh lhek iRuh Jh foosd] fuoklh ukSgjk/kkj] rglhy ukSgjk/kkj] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0
- - izkFkhZu
cuke
vke turk
- - izfroknhx.k
mijksDr izkFkZuk&i= Jherh lhek iRuh Jh foosd] fuoklh ukSgjk/kkj] rglhy ukSgjk/kkj] ftyk
fljekSj] fg0 iz0 us v/khu /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969 ds vUrxZr izLrqr djds
izkFkZuk dh gS fd mudh iq=h d`frdk ftldh tUe frfFk 25&10&2010 gS] dk uke xzke iapk;r ukSgjk/kkj
ds fjdkMZ esa ntZ ugha djok;k x;k gSA ftls izkfFkZu vc ntZ djokuk pkgrh gSA
2211
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
vc loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl lEcU/k esa ;fn fdlh O;fDr
dks mtj ;k ,rjkt gks rks og Lo;a vFkok vius izfrfuf/k }kjk fefr 23&06&2017 dks lqcg nl cts
vnkyr esa mifLFkr vkdj ,rjkt izLrqr djsa] clwjr nhxj dqekjh d`frdk dk uke ,oa tUe frfFk dks
ntZ djus ds vkns'k tkjh dj fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 24&05&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]
rglhy ukSgjk/kkj] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&&&&
CHANGE OF NAME
I, Kshitij s/o Shri Krishan Kumar, resident of Village Zadhyal, Post Office Dhari (Shoghi),
Tehsil and District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh have changed my name from Kshitij to Kshitij
Kumar Verma. Please note.
KSHITIJ KUMAR VERMA
s/o Shri Krishan Kumar,
resident of Village Zadhyal, Post Office Dhari (Shoghi),
Tehsil and District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.
_________
jkT; fuokZpu vk;ksx fgekpy izns'k
STATE ELECTION COMMISSION HIMACHAL PRADESH
vketZMsy f”keyk &171002 Armsdale,Shimla-171002 Tel. 0177-2620152,2620159,2620154, Fax. 2620152
[email protected]
vf/klwpuk
Dated, the 17th June, 2017
No.SEC(13)-96/2017-III-1197-1202.—;r% jkT; fuokZpu vk;ksx fgekpy izns'k }kjk Hkkjrh;
lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 243ZA, fgekpy izns'k uxj fuxe vf/kfu;e] 1994 dh /kkjk 9 ds lkFk ifBr
fgekpy izns'k uxj fuxe fuokZpu fu;e] 2012 ds fu;e 33 dh vuqikyuk es uxj fuxe f'keyk ds
lkekU; fuokZpu djokus gsrq vf/klwpuk la[;k SEC(13)-96/2017-III-880-922 fnukad 29-05-2017 vuqlkj
fuokZpu dk;ZØe tkjh fd;k x;k Fkk;
;r% vc uxj fuxe f'keyk ds fuokZpu djok fy, x;s gS rFkk mDr fu;ekoyh ds fu;e 80 ¼6½
ds vUrZxr fjVZfuax vf/kdkjh ,oa mik;qDr f'keyk ls leLr 34 okMksZ dh fjVuZ iz:i&44 ij vk;ksx esa
izkIr gks x;h gS;
2212
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
vr% jkT; fuokZpu vk;ksx] fgekpy izns'k uxj fuxe vf/kfu;e 1994 dh /kkjk 13 dh vuqikyuk
es uxj fuxe f'keyk ds fy, fuokZfpr ik"kZnks ds uke o irs fuEukuqlkj vf/klwfpr djrk gS%&
Øe
la
okMZ dh la[;k o
uke
vkj{k.k
fuokZfpr ik"knksZ dk uke o irk
1 1&HkjkM+h
efgyk
Jhefr ruqtk pkS/kjh] lsBh fuokl dyLVu f”keykA
2 2&:ynw&HkVVk
vukjf{kr
Jh latho Bkdqj] d`’.kk dksVst :ynwHkVVk] f”keykA
3 3&dSFkw
vukjf{kr
Jh lquhy /kj] fuoklh enwlqnu fcfYMax yksvj dSFkw
f”keykA
4 4&vukMsy
vuq0tkfr efgyk
Jhefr dqlqe lnjsV] cySUlh;k ,LVsV yksvj dSaFkw
vukMsy f”keykA
5 5&Lkejfgy
efgyk
Jhefr “kSyh “kekZ] Mh&2] jsfM;sUV gksEt lejfgy]
f”keykA
6 6&VwVw
vukjf{kr
Jh foosd “kekZ] “kekZ fcfYMax] VwVq pkSd rg0 o ftyk
f”keykA
7 7&etkB
vukjf{kr
Jh fnokdj nso “kekZ] nsoh dkVst] utnhd oS/k fcfYMax
U;w VwVq rg0 o thyk f”keykA
8 8&ckywxat
efgyk
Jhefr fdj.k ckok] ckok fuokl] pDdj rg0o ftyk
f”keykA
9 9&dPph?kkVh
vukjf{kr
Jh lat; ijekj] ;ks?knk vkJe ckywxat f”keykA
10 10&VwVhd.Mh
vukjf{kr
Jh vkuUn dkS”ky]ghjk fuokl] VqVhdaMh] f”keyk&4
11 11&ukHkk
vuq0tkfr efgyk
Jhefr flEeh uUnk] vfer ykWt]Qxyh f”keyk&4A
12 12&Qkxyh
vuqlwfpr tkfr
Jh txthr flag cXxk] lSaV ,yoal dkVst f”keyk&1
13 13&d`".kkuxj
vuqlwfpr tkfr
Jh fcVVq dqekj] edku u0 12 fcyks flag lHkk xMMh
[kkuk] d`’.kk uxj f”keyk&1
14 14&jke
cktkj
xat
vukjf{kr
Jhefr lq’kek dqfB;kyk] 78] cqVsy fuokl] jke cktkj
f”keykA
15 15&yksvj cktkj
vukjf{kr
Jh banzthr flag] r”khuk dkVst] [kyhuh] f”keykA
16 16&tk[kw
efgyk
Jhefr vpZuk /kou] 30] pkyhZ ekamV tk[kw f”keykA
17 17&cSueksj
efgyk
Jhefr fdeh lwn] phQ Qk;j vkWfQl fcfYMax] QksjsLV
jksM fu;j gsukYV Ldwy LVksDl iSysl NksVk f”keykA
18 18&bZatu?kj
efgyk
dq0 vkjrh pkSgku] lw;Zoa”kh pkSgku fuokl] latkSyh
f”keyk&6
19 19&latkSyh pkSd
vukjf{kr
Jhefr lR;k dkSaMy] e;wj fuokl uksFkZ vksd latkSyh
f”keyk&6
20 20&vIij&<yh
efgyk
Jhefr deys”k eSgrk] eSgrk fuokl bZUnz uxj <+yh
f”keyk&12A
21 21&yksvj <yh
vukjf{kr
Jh “kSysUnz pkSgku] fHkdVk fuokl] utnhd nqxkZ efUnj
<+yh f”keyk&12A
2213
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
22 22&'kkfUr fogkj
efgyk
Jhefr “kkjnk pkSgku] vf[ky fuokl] lehVªh jksM]
latkSyh&6A
23 23&HkVVkdqQj
efgyk
Jhefr jhrk Bkdqj] njksxk fuokl xkgu deykuxj]
f”keykA
24 24&lkaxVh
efgyk
Jhefr ehjk “kekZ] “kkjnk lkaxVh latkSyh] f”keyk&6A
25 25&eY;k.kk
vukjf{kr
Jh dqynhi Bkdqj] “kguku Mkd?kj] latkSyh
f”keyk&6A
26 26&iaFkk?kkVh
vukjf{kr
Jh jkds”k dqekj “kekZ] jked`’.k Hkou] iaFkk?kkVh A
27 27&dlqEiVh
vukjf{kr
Jh jkds”k pkSgku] /kkj gkÅl tho.kw dykSuh
dlqEiVhA
28 28&NksVk f'keyk
efgyk
Jhefr fonqf’k “kekZ] lSV u0 5 ljkt eS”ku NksVk
f”keykA
29 29&fodkluxj
vuq0tkfr efgyk
Jhefr jpuk] iyd Hkou ykvj fodkluxj] f”keykA
30 30&daxuk/kkj
efgyk
Jhefr jsuw pkSgku]T;ksfr fuokl dkxuk/kkj
31 31&iV;ksx
efgyk
Jhefr vk”kk “kekZ] ;”kksnk Hkou ch0lh0,l0 U;w
f”keykA
32 32&U;q&f'keyk
vukjf{kr
Jhefr dqlqeyrk Bkdqj v”ouh fcfYMax lSDVj&2] U;w
f”keyk
33 33&[kyhuh
vuqlwfpr tkfr
Jh iqju ey] uo fudsru Hkou] yksvj [kyhuh]
f”keykA
34 34&duyksx
efgyk
Jhefr c`t lwn] U;w ukjax fu;j ds0,u0,p0 f”keykA
vkns'k }kjk]
gLrk{kfjr@&
jkT; fuokZpu vk;ksx]
fgekpy izns'kA
&&&&&&&&
jkT; fuokZpu vk;ksx fgekpy izns'k
STATE ELECTION COMMISSION HIMACHAL PRADESH
vketZMsy f”keyk &171002 Armsdale,Shimla-171002 Tel. 0177-2620152,2620159,2620154, Fax. 2620152
[email protected]
NOTIFICATION
Dated, the 17th June, 2017
No.SEC(13)-96/2017-III-1197-1202.—Whereas the State Election Commission has issued
election programme under Article 243ZA of Constitution of India, Section 9 of the Himachal
Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1994 read with Rule 33 of the Himachal Pradesh Municipal
Corporation Election Rules, 2012 vide Notification No. SEC(13)-96/2017-III-880-922 dated
29.05.2017 for the conduct of elections to Municipal Corporation Shimla.
2214
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
And whereas, now the election has been conducted and the Return of Election on Form-44
of the all 34 wards has been received from the Returning Officer-cum -Deputy Commissioner
Shimla as required under Rule 80 (6) of the ibid Rules;
Therefore, the State Election Commission, in exercise of the powers vested in it under
Section 13 of the Municipal Corporation Act, 1994, hereby publishes the names and addresses of
the newly elected Councillors of the Municipal Corporation Shimla as under:—
Sr.
No.
No. & Name of
Wards
Reservation
Status
Name & address of the elected Councillors
1 1- Bharari
Woman
Smt. Tanuja Chaudhary, Sethi Niwas, Keleston
Shimla.
2 2-Ruldu-Bhatta
Unreserved
Sh. Sanjeev Thakur, Krishna Cottage, Ruldubhatta,
Shimla.
3 3-Kaithu
Unreserved
Sh. Sunil Dhar, Madhusudan Building Lower
Kaithu, Shimla.
4 4-Annandale
Woman S.C.
Smt. Kusum Sadret, Balencya Estate, Lower
Kaithu Annadale Shimla.
5 5-Summer Hill
Woman
Smt. Shelli Sharma, D-2, Rediyent Homes,
Summer hill Shimla.
6 6-Totu
Unreserved
Sh. Vivek Sharma, Sharma Building Totu Chowk,
Tehsil & Distt. Shimla.
7 7-Majiath
Unreserved
Sh. Divakar Dev Sharma, Devi Cottage Near Vaid
Building New Totu, Teh. & Distt. Shimla.
8 8-Boileauganj
Woman
Smt. Kiran Bava, Bava Niwas Chakkar, Teh.&
Distt. Shimla.
9 9-Kachhighati
Unreserved
Sh. Sanjay Parmar, Yogdha Ashram Baluganj
Shimla.
10 10-Tutikandi -Badai
Unreserved
Sh. Anand Kaushal, Hira Niwas, Tutikandi,
Shimla4.
11 11-Nabha
Woman S.C.
Smt. Simi Nanda, Amt Lodge, Shimla-4.
12 12-Phagli
Schedule Caste
Sh. Jagjeet Singh Baga, Sent Alvance Cottage
Shimla-1.
13 13-Krishna Nagar
Schedule Caste
Sh. Bittu Kumar H.No. 12 Below Singh Sabha
Gaddi Khana Krishna Nagar, Shimla-1.
14 14-Ram Bazar Ganj
Unreserved
Smt. Sushma Kuthiala, 78 Butail Niwas Ram
Bazar, Shimla.
2215
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
15 15-Lower Bazar
Unreserved
Sh. Inderjeet Singh, Tashina Cottage, Khalini,
Shimla.
16 16-Jhakhu
Woman
Smt. Archana Dhawan, 30, Charli Mount, Jakhoo,
Shimla.
17 17-Benmore
Woman
Smt. Kimi Sood, Chief Fire Office Building,
Forest Road Near Henault School Stocks Palace
Chhota Shimla-2.
18 18-Engine Ghar
Woman
Kumari Arti Chauhan, Suryanshi Chauhan Niwas,
Sanjauli, Shimloa-6.
19 19-Sanjouli Chowk
Unreserved
Smt. Satya Kondal, Mayur Niwas North Oak,
Sanjauli, Shimla.
20 20-Upper Dhalli
Woman
Smt. Kemlesh Mehta, Mehta Niwas, Inder Nagar,
Dhalli Shimla-12.
21 21-Lower Dhalli
Unreserved
Sh. Shellender Chauhan, Bhikta Niwas, Near
Durga Mandir, Dhalli, Shimla-12.
22 22-Shanti Vihar
Woman
Smt. Sharda Chauhan, Akhil Niwas, Simitri Road,
Sanjauli, Shimla-6.
23 23-Bhattakufar
Woman
Smt. Rita Thakur, Daroga Niwas Gahan, Kamla
Nagar, Shimla.
24 24-Sangati
Woman
Smt. Meera Sharma, Sharda Sadan, Sangti
Sanjauli, Shimla-6.
25 25-Malyana
Unreserved
Sh. Kuldeep Thakur, Shahnan P.O.Sanjauli,
Shimla-6.
26 26-Pantha Ghatti
Unreserved
Sh. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Ramkrishan Bhavan,
Panthaghatti.
27 27-Kasumpti
Unreserved
Sh. Rakesh Chauhan, Dhar House, Jiuni Colony
Kusumpati, Shimla.
28 28-Chhota Shimla
Woman
Smt. Vidushi Sharma, Set No. 5, Saraj Meshan
Chhota Shimla.
29 29-Vikasnagar
Woman S.C.
Smt. Rachna, Palak Bhavan Lower Vikasnagar,
Shimla.
30 30-Kangna Dhar
Woman
Smt. Renu Chauhan, Jayoti Niwas, Kangnadhar.
31 31-Pateog
Woman
Smt. Asha Sharma, Yashoda Bhavan, BCS New
Shimla.
32 32-New Shimla
Unreserved
Smt. Kusumlata Thakur, Ashwani Building Sector-
2, New Shimla.
2216
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 twu] 2017@27 T;s"B] 1939
33 33-Khalini
Schedule Caste
Sh. Puran Mal, Nav Niketan Bhavan, Lower
Khalini, Shimla.
34 34-Kanlog
Woman
Smt. Brij Sood, New Narang Near KNH, Shimla
By order,
Sd/-
State Election Commission,
Himachal Pradesh.
fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr
bysDVªkWfud gLrk{kfjr jkti=] oSclkbV http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in ij miyC/k gS ,oe~ vkWuykbu lR;kfir fd;k tk ldrk gS