jkti=] fgekpy izns'k
fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr
lkseokj] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
fgekpy izns'k ljdkj
INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT
A-Section
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171002, the 12th June, 2017
No.Ind-A(A)1-1/2017.—The Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to order to
establish a new Mining Office at Nurpur, Distt. Kangra, with immediate effect with the areas of
Nurpur, Fatehpur and Jawali Sub-Divisions under its jurisdiction.
56&jkti=@2017&19&06&2017
¼2217½
2218
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
The Governor, Himachal Pradesh is also pleased to create following posts for the above
Mining Office at Nurpur:—
Sr.
No.
Name of Post
No. of post(s)
Pay Band
1.
Mining Officer
01
Rs.10300-34800 + 4200 GP
2.
Mining Inspector
01
Rs. 5910-20200 + 2800 GP
3.
Assistant Mining Inspector
01
Rs. 5910-20200 + 2400 GP
By order,
Sd/-
Addl. Chief Secretary (Inds.).
_____________
HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-02, the 14th June, 2017
No. EDN-A-Ka(1)-32/2007-Loose.—The following Government Degree College(s) have
been newly opened with effect from 2017-18 i.e. from the session June, 2017 :—
(a) Government Degree College Telka, Distt. Chamba (H.P.).
(b) Government Degree College Bhallai, Distt. Chamba (H.P.).
(c) Government Degree College Matour, Distt. Kangra (H.P.).
(d) Government Degree College Dehra, Distt. Kangra (H.P.).
(e) Government Degree College Haroli, Distt. Una (H.P.).
(f) Government Degree College Jainagar, Distt. Solan (H.P.).
(g) Government Degree College Darlaghat, Distt. Solan (H.P.).
The Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to order the creation of following teaching
and non-teaching posts for the above mentioned each newly opened Government Degree
College:—
Sr.
No
Category/Name of
Post(s) (For each College)
No of
Post(s)
Pay Band/Scale
1.
Principal
01x7=7
Rs. 37400-67000+GP 10000
2219
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
2.
Assistant Professor :—
(a) English
(b) Hindi
(c) History
(d) Pol. Science
(e) Economics
(f) Commerce
01 x7=7
01 x7=7
01 x7=7
01 x7=7
01 x7=7
02x7=14
Rs. 15600-39100 + GP 6000 (For
regular appointee)
Rs. 15600 + 6000 = 21600/-PM (For
contract appointee)
3.
Librarian (College Cadre)
01 x7=7
Rs. 15600-39100 + GP 6000 (For
regular appointee)
Rs. 15600 + 6000 = 21600/-PM
(For contract appointee)
4.
Superintendent Gr-II
01 x7=7
Rs. 10300-34800+ GP- 4800
5.
Senior Assistant
01 x7=7
Rs. 10300-34800+ GP- 4400
6.
Junior Office Assistant
02x7=14
Rs. 5910+GP-1950 = 7860/-PM (For
Contract appointee)
7.
Peon
03 x7=21
Rs. 4900+GP-1300 = 6200/-PM (For
Contract appointee)
Rs. 4900-10680+ GP- 1300 (For initial
two years of regular service)
Rs. 4900-10680+ GP- 1650 (Given after
2 years of regular service)
8.
Chowkidar
02 x7=14
Rs. 4900+GP-1300 = 6200/-PM (For
Contract appointee)
Rs. 4900-10680+ GP- 1300 (For initial
two years of regular service)
Rs. 4900-10680+ GP- 1650 (Given after
2 years of regular service)
Total Posts
18 x7=126
The expenditure will be incurred under Major Head 2202-03-103-01-Soon-Non- Plan for
smooth functioning of these colleges.
This issues with prior concurrence of the Fin. Department obtained vide their U.O No
53988501-Fin-E/2017, dated 04th June, 2017 and in the Cabinet meeting held on 05th June, 2017.
By order,
Sd/-
Addl. Chief Secretary(Education).
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 20th January, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Jag Dev S/O Shri Nanak Chand, R/O
Village and Post Office Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated 28.5.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,
2220
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,
but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent
a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,
H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 12 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 15.2.2014;
And whereas Shri Jag Dev S/O Shri Nanak Chand agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4686/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 24.12.2015 and directed the respondent to take appropriate
action in accordance with law positively within a period of four weeks. The operative part of the
judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In view of the settled position of law, the impugned orders are thus legally not
sustainable. Consequently, impugned orders Annexures P-1, P-2 and P-3 are quashed and
set aside with the direction to respondent No.-2 to take appropriate action in accordance
with law. Needful be positively done within a period of four weeks from the date of
production of certified copy of the judgment.
With the aforesaid observations, present petition stands disposed of, so also pending
application(s), if any.’
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Jag Dev S/O Shri Nanak Chand,
R/O Village and Post Office Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. before the
Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba,
H.P. vide demand notice dated 28.5.2012 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service
during August, 1999 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the
services of Shri Jag Dev S/O Shri Nanak Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Purthi, Tehsil
Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division,
Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during August, 1999 without complying the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved
workman is entitled to from the above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
2221
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 20th January, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Ajeet Kumar S/O Shri Babu Ram,
R/O Village and Post Office Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated 2.1.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,
I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,
but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent
a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,
H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order
dated 7.10.2015;
And whereas Shri Ajeet Kumar S/O Shri Babu Ram agitated the above orders of declining
of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4686/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 24.12.2015 and directed the respondent to take appropriate
action in accordance with law positively within a period of four weeks. The operative part of the
judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In view of the settled position of law, the impugned orders are thus legally not
sustainable. Consequently, impugned orders Annexures P-1, P-2 and P-3 are quashed and
set aside with the direction to respondent No.-2 to take appropriate action in accordance
with law. Needful be positively done within a period of four weeks from the date of
production of certified copy of the judgment.
With the aforesaid observations, present petition stands disposed of, so also pending
application(s), if any.’
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Ajeet Kumar S/O Shri Babu Ram,
R/O Village and Post Office Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. before the
Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba,
H.P. vide demand notice dated 2.1.2012 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service
during August, 2004 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the
services of Shri Ajeet Kumar S/O Shri Babu Ram, R/O Village and Post Office Dharwas,
Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D.
Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during August, 2004 without
complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not,
2222
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above
aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Devi Chand S/O Shri Munshi Ram,
R/O Village Salga, P.O. Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from back date
by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour
Officercum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial
dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings,
where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour
Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he
should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute
vide order dated 19.09.2015;
And whereas Shri Devi Chand S/O Shri Munshi Ram, agitated the above orders of declining
of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to
make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part
of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ
petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ
petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
2223
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
1
“Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Devi Chand S/O Shri
Munshi Ram, R/O Village Salga, P.O. Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P.
during the year 1995 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division,
Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and
has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated
30.03.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is
legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7
years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/
management?”
2
“Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand
notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Devi Chand S/O Shri Munshi
Ram, R/O Village Salga, P.O. Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be fulfilled
by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. from the
date his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is legal and
justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service benefits the
above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Dumnu S/O Shri Lachho, R/O
Village and Post Office Kohladi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from back date
by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-
cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute
amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where
after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour
Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he
should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute
vide order dated 19.09.2015;
2224
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
And whereas Shri Dumnu S/O Shri Lachho, agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to
make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part
of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ
petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ
petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
1
“Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Dumnu S/O Shri Lachho,
R/O Village and Post Office Kohladi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during the year
1996 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District
Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his
industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014,
without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and
justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7 years in
raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
2
“Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand
notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Dumnu S/O Shri Lachho, R/O
Village and Post Office Kohladi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be fulfilled by
Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. from the date
his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is legal and
justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service benefits the
above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Kamal Lal S/O Shri Karam Chand,
R/O Village and Post Office Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from back date
2225
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-
cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute
amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where
after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour
Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he
should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute
vide order dated 19.09.2015;
And whereas Shri Kamal Lal S/O Shri Karam Chand, agitated the above orders of declining
of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to
make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part
of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ
petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ
petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
1
“Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Kamal Lal S/O Shri
Karam Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P.
during the year 1997 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division,
Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and
has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated
30.03.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is
legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7
years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/
management?”
2
“Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand
notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Kamal Lal S/O Shri Karam
Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be
fulfilled by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P.
from the date his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is
2226
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
legal and justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service
benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Mohinder Kumar S/O Shri Hachhu
Ram, R/O Village Dugli, P.O. Khundel, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from
back date by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The
Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the
industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation
proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he
should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute
vide order dated 19.09.2015;
And whereas Shri Mohinder Kumar S/O Shri Hachhu Ram, agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour
Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunalcum-Labour Court within six
weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ
petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ
petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
2227
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
1.
“Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Mohinder Kumar S/O
Shri Hachhu Ram, R/O Village Dugli, P.O. Khundel, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P.
during the year 1995 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division,
Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and
has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated
30.03.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is
legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7
years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/
management?”
2
“Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand
notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Mohinder Kumar S/O Shri
Hachhu Ram, R/O Village Dugli, P.O. Khundel, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to
be fulfilled by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P.
from the date his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is
legal and justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service
benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Rakesh Kumar S/O Shri Hans Raj,
R/O Village and Post Office Saru, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from back date
by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-
cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute
amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where
after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour
Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he
should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute
vide order dated 19.09.2015;
And whereas Shri Rakesh Kumar S/O Shri Hans Raj, agitated the above orders of declining
of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to
make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part
of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
2228
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ
petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ
petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
1
“Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Rakesh Kumar S/O Shri
Hans Raj, R/O Village and Post Office Saru, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during
the year 1997 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised
his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014,
without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and
justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7 years in
raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
2
“Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand
notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Rakesh Kumar S/O Shri Hans
Raj, R/O Village and Post Office Saru, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be fulfilled
by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. from the
date his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is legal and
justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service benefits the
above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Ramesh Kumar S/O Shri Kishan
Chand, R/O Village Udaipur, P.O. Saru, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination/regularization of services from back
date by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour
Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial
dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings,
where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour
Commissioner, H.P.;
2229
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he
should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute
vide order dated 19.09.2015;
And whereas Shri Ramesh Kumar S/O Shri Kishan Chand, agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour
Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six
weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ
petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ
petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
1
“Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Ramesh Kumar S/O Shri
Kishan Chand, R/O Village Udaipur, P.O. Saru, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P.
during the year 1997 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division,
Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and
has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated
30.03.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is
legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7
years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/
management?”
2
“Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand
notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Ramesh Kumar S/O Shri
Kishan Chand, R/O Village Udaipur, P.O. Saru, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be
fulfilled by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P.
from the date his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is
legal and justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service
benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
2230
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Subhash S/O Shri Hem Chand, R/O
Village Millah, P.O. Singi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated
30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from back date by the
Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer cum-
Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,
but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent
a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,
H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he
should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute
vide order dated 19.09.2015;
And whereas Shri Subhash S/O Shri Hem Chand, agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to
make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part
of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ
petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ
petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
1
“Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Subhash S/O Shri Hem
Chand, R/O Village Millah, P.O. Singi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during the
year 1997 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised
his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014,
without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and
justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7 years in
raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
2231
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
2
“Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand
notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Subhash S/O Shri Hem Chand,
R/O Village Millah, P.O. Singi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be fulfilled by
Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. from the date
his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is legal and
justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service benefits the
above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Suresh Kumar S/O Shri Gajlo Ram,
R/O Village Bhanota, P.O. Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from back date
by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-
cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute
amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where
after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour
Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he
should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute
vide order dated 21.09.2015;
And whereas Shri Suresh Kumar S/O Shri Gajlo Ram, agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour
Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six
weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ
petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ
petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
2232
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
1
“Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Suresh Kumar S/O Shri
Gajlo Ram, R/O Village Bhanota, P.O. Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P.
during the year 1997 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division,
Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and
has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated
30.03.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is
legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7
years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/
management?”
2
“Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand
notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Suresh Kumar S/O Shri Gajlo
Ram, R/O Village Bhanota, P.O. Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be
fulfilled by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P.
from the date his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is
legal and justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service
benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Tilak Raj S/O Shri Ghunghar Ram,
R/O Village Dhar, P.O. Khundel, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from back date
by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer
cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute
amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where
after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour
Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he
should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute
vide order dated 19.09.2015;
And whereas Shri Tilak Raj S/O Shri Ghunghar Ram, agitated the above orders of declining
of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
2233
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to
make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part
of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ
petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ
petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
1
“Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Tilak Raj S/O Shri
Ghunghar Ram, R/O Village Dhar, P.O. Khundel, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P.
during the year 1998 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division,
Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and
has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated
30.03.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is
legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7
years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/
management?”
2
“Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand
notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Tilak Raj S/O Shri Ghunghar
Ram, R/O Village Dhar, P.O. Khundel, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be fulfilled
by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. from the
date his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is legal and
justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service benefits the
above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016
No. 11-1/7(Lab) ID/2015-Joginder Nagar.—Whereas Shri Megh Singh S/O Shri Gawanu
Ram, R/O Village and Post Office Gwali, Tehsil Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated 02.01.2013 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Senior Executive
2234
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B. Limited, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. The
Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the
industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation
proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Joginder
Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 13 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order
dated 3.12.2013;
And whereas Shri Megh Singh S/O Shri Gawanu Ram agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 164/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 23.02.2016 and directed the respondents to
consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014, delivered
by Hon’ble High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus
Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the
judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Megh Singh S/O Shri Gawanu Ram, R/O
Village and Post Office Gwali, Tehsil Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 25.03.1999 by the
Senior Executive Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B. Limited, Joginder Nagar,
District Mandi, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages only for 138 days during
years, 1996-99 and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 13 years vide demand
notice dated 02.01.2013, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period of 138 days during
years, 1998-99 and delay of more than 13 years in raising the industrial dispute, what
amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-
worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
2235
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Mehar Chand S/O Shri Mahajan Ram,
R/O Village and Post Office Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated 05.10.2010 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but
the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a
report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi,
District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 19.3.2013;
And whereas Shri Mehar Chand S/O Shri Mahajan Ram agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 158/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 23.2.2016 and directed the respondents to
consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 delivered
by the High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014-titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh
State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is
reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions is disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Mehar Chand S/O Shri Mahajan Ram, R/O
Village and Post Office Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. during year, 2003 by
the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P., who had
worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7
years vide demand notice dated 5.10.2010, without complying the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more
than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
2236
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 8th March, 2016
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Nand Lal S/O Shri Gurdittu Ram, R/O
Village Khanud, P.O. Khoral, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated 18.11.2009 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but
the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a
report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi,
District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 15 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 16.02.2013;
And whereas Shri Nand Lal S/O Shri Gurdittu Ram agitated the above orders of declining
of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 68 of 2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 6.1.2016 and directed the Labour Commissioner to make
reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the
judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash impugned order, dated
20.03.2012 (Annexure P-1) and direct the Labour Commissioner to make reference to the
Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly.
4 The writ petition is disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, alongwith all pending
applications.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Nand Lal S/O Shri Gurdittu Ram,
R/O Village Khanud, P.O. Khoral, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. before the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. vide demand
notice dated 18.11.2009 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during April,
1994 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri
Nand Lal S/O Shri Gurdittu Ram, R/O Village Khanud, P.O. Khoral, Tehsil Sunder Nagar,
District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar,
District Mandi, H.P. during April, 1994 without complying the provisions of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority,
past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the
above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
2237
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 8th March, 2016
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Sita Ram S/O Shri Dalela Ram, R/O
Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated 17.8.2010 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but
the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a
report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi,
District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 12 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 19.3.2012;
And whereas Shri Sita Ram S/O Shri Dalela Ram agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 68 of 2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 6.1.2016 and directed the Labour Commissioner to make
reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the
judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash impugned order, dated
20.03.2012 (Annexure P-1) and direct the Labour Commissioner to make reference to the
Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly.
4 The writ petition is disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, alongwith all pending
applications.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Sita Ram S/O Shri Dalela Ram,
R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. before the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. vide demand
notice dated 17.08.2010 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during February,
1998 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Sita
Ram S/O Shri Dalela Ram, R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District
Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District
Mandi, H.P. during February, 1998 without complying the provisions of the Industrial
2238
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the
above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 8th March, 2016
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Rattan Lal S/O Shri Garja Ram, R/O
Village Sanihal, P.O. Dhawala, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated 17.8.2010 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but
the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a
report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi,
District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 12 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 16.02.2013;
And whereas Shri Rattan Lal S/O Shri Garja Ram agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 68 of 2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 6.1.2016 and directed the Labour Commissioner to make
reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the
judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash impugned order, dated
20.03.2012 (Annexure P-1) and direct the Labour Commissioner to make reference to the
Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly.
4 The writ petition is disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, alongwith all pending
applications.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
2239
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Rattan Lal S/O Shri Garja Ram,
R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Dhawala, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. before the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. vide demand
notice dated 17.08.2010 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during July,
1998 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri
Rattan Lal S/O Shri Garja Ram, R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Dhawala, Tehsil Sunder Nagar,
District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar,
District Mandi, H.P. during July, 1998 without complying the provisions of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the
above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 8th March, 2016
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Tek Chand S/O Shri Lekh Ram, R/O
Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated 17.8.2010 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but
the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a
report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi,
District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 11 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 19.03.2012;
And whereas Shri Tek Chand S/O Shri Lekh Ram agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 68 of 2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 6.1.2016 and directed the Labour Commissioner to make
reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the
judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash impugned order, dated
20.03.2012 (Annexure P-1) and direct the Labour Commissioner to make reference to the
Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly.
4 The writ petition is disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, alongwith all pending
applications.”
2240
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Tek Chand S/O Shri Lekh Ram,
R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. before the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. vide demand
notice dated 17.08.2010 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during
September, 1998 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services
of Shri Tek Chand S/O Shri Lekh Ram, R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder
Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder
Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. during September, 1998 without complying the provisions of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled
to from the above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 8th March, 2016
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Rajesh Kumar S/O Shri Jai Chand,
R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated 17.8.2010 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but
the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a
report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi,
District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 12 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 19.03.2012;
And whereas Shri Rajesh Kumar S/O Shri Jai Chand agitated the above orders of declining
of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 68 of 2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 6.1.2016 and directed the Labour Commissioner to make
reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the
judgment is reproduced as follows;
2241
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash impugned order, dated
20.03.2012 (Annexure P-1) and direct the Labour Commissioner to make reference to the
Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly.
4 The writ petition is disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, alongwith all pending
applications.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Rajesh Kumar S/O Shri Jai
Chand, R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. before
the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. vide
demand notice dated 17.08.2010 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during
August, 1998 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of
Shri Rajesh Kumar S/O Shri Jai Chand, R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder
Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder
Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. during August, 1998 without complying the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled
to from the above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Narinder Kumar S/O Shri Nanak
Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Ponto, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a
demand notice dated 02.06.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the
Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The
Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the
industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation
proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 9.10.2014;
2242
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
And whereas Shri Narinder Kumar S/O Shri Nanak Chand agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 129/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to
consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014, CWP
No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and
others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Narinder Kumar S/O Shri Nanak Chand,
R/O Village and Post Office Ponto, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September,
2004 by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi,
District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his
industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 02.06.2012, without
complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not,
keeping in view of delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount
of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 9th March, 2016
No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2015-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Nathu Ram S/O Shri Gurdyal Singh,
R/O Village and Post Office Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated 23.07.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the
same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report
under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
2243
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala,
District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of about 23 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated
13.11.2014;
And whereas Shri Nathu Ram S/O Shri Gurdyal Singh agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4864/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 6.1.2016 and directed the respondents to consider
the case of the petitioner, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 delivered by
Hon’ble High Court of H.P. in a batch of writ petitions, CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap
Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The
operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions is disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Nathu Ram S/O Shri Gurdyal Singh, R/O
Village and Post Office Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during April, 1988 by
the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had
worked as beldar on daily wages only for 197 ½ days and 76 days in year, 1987 & 1988 and
has raised his industrial dispute after about 23 years vide demand notice dated 23.07.2011,
without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified
? If not, keeping in view of working period of 197 ½ days and 76 days in year, 1987 & 1988
respectively and delay of about 23 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 16th February, 2016
No. 11-1/7(Lab) ID/2015-Joginder Nagar.—Whereas Shri Om Chand S/O Shri Chhadia,
R/O Village Dharehada, P.O. Pehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand
2244
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
notice dated 22.1.2013 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive
Engineer, B&R Division H.P.P.W.D., Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Inspector-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute
amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where
after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour
Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Inspector-cum- Conciliation Officer, Joginder
Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of after about 12 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order
dated 18.3.2015;
And whereas Shri Om Chand S/O Shri Chhadia agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 3282/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 30.7.2015 and directed the respondents to consider the case of
the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014 case titled Pratap Chand
versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being the lead case within eight weeks.
The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petition are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending application, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Om Chand S/O Shri Chhadia, R/O
Village Dharehada, P.O. Pehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. before the Executive
Engineer, B&R Division H.P.P.W.D., Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. vide demand notice
dated 22.1.2013 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during year, 2001
suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Om
Chand S/O Shri Chhadia, R/O Village Dharehada, P.O. Pehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District
Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, B&R Division H.P.P.W.D., Dharampur, District
Mandi, H.P. during year, 2001 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above
employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
2245
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 8th March, 2016
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Parkash Chand S/O Shri Hari Singh,
R/O Village Chah, P.O. Mandap, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated 30.11.2009 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but
the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a
report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi,
District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 9 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 30.03.2012;
And whereas Shri Parkash Chand S/O Shri Hari Singh agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4633/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 17.12.2015 and directed the respondents to
consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014, CWP
No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and
others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioner, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions is disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Parkash Chand S/O Shri Hari
Singh, R/O Village Chah, P.O. Mandap, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. before the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. vide demand
notice dated 30.11.2009 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service w.e.f.
01.01.2000 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of
Shri Parkash Chand S/O Shri Hari Singh, R/O Village Chah, P.O. Mandap, Tehsil
Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division,
Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 01.01.2000 without complying the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,
2246
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled
to from the above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Parwati W/O Shri Ramesh, R/O
Village Chalali, P.O. Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated –nil received in Labour Office, Chamba on 29.5.2012 regarding her illegal termination from
the services by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi,
District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba,
H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the
course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order
dated 6.10.2015;
And whereas Smt. Parwati W/O Shri Ramesh agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 31/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the cases
of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 in CWP No. 9467 of 2014
case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight
weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
2247
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
“Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Parwati W/O Shri Ramesh, R/O Village
Chalali, P.O. Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004 by the
Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District
Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised her industrial
dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated-nil-received on 29.5.2012,
without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified
? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what
amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-
worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Yog Raj S/O Shri Prem Lal, R/O
Village Shour, P.O. Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated
25.3.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, Killar
Division, H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,
but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent
a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,
H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 6 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order
dated 8.10.2015;
And whereas Shri Yog Raj S/O Shri Prem Lal agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 31/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the cases
of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 in CWP No. 9467 of 2014
case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight
weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
2248
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Yog Raj S/O Shri Prem Lal, R/O Village
Shour, P.O. Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during October, 2005 by the
Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba,
H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after
more than 6 years vide demand notice dated 25.3.2012, without complying the provisions of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of
more than 6 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority,
past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Sheela W/O Shri Prem Raj, R/O
Village Kufa, P.O. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated
24.9.2012 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, Killar
Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officercum-
Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,
but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent
a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,
H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of 8
years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 5.2.2014;
And whereas Smt. Sheela W/O Shri Prem Raj agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 31/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the cases
of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 in CWP No. 9467 of 2014
case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight
weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
2249
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/
issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Sheela W/O Shri Prem Raj, R/O Village
Kufa, P.O. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004 by the
Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District
Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised her industrial
dispute after 8 years vide demand notice dated 24.9.2012, without complying the provisions
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of delay
of 8 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employer/ management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Sato Devi W/O Shri Dhano, R/O
Village Kuthah, P.O. Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated –nil-received in Labour Office, Chamba on 15.6.2012 regarding her illegal termination from
the services by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi,
District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba,
H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the
course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 9 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 30.4.2014;
2250
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
And whereas Smt. Sato Devi W/O Shri Dhano agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 31/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the cases
of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 in CWP No. 9467 of 2014
case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight
weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Sato Devi W/O Shri Dhano, R/O Village
Kuthah, P.O. Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2002 by the
Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District
Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised her industrial
dispute after more than 9 years vide demand notice dated –nil-received on 15.06.2012,
without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified
? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 9 years in raising the industrial dispute, what
amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-
worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 16th Februay, 2016
No. 11-1/7(Lab) ID/2015-Joginder Nagar.—Whereas Smt. Parwati Devi W/O Shri
Purshotam, R/O Village Banjal (Langehar), P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. had
raised a demand notice dated 16.08.2011 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Inspector-
cum- Conciliation Officer, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute
amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where
after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour
Commissioner, H.P.;
2251
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Inspector-cum- Conciliation Officer, Joginder
Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 6 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order
dated 25.8.2012;
And whereas Smt. Parwati Devi W/O Shri Purshotam agitated the above orders of declining
of reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 3504/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 24.08.2015 and directed the respondents to consider the case
of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014 case titled Pratap Chand
versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being the lead case within eight weeks.
The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petition are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending application, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Smt. Parwati Devi W/O Shri
Purshotam, R/O Village Banjal (Langehar), P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi,
H.P. before the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P.
vide demand notice dated 16.8.2011 regarding her alleged illegal termination of service
w.e.f. 08.07.2005 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the
services of Smt. Parwati Devi W/O Shri Purshotam, R/O Village Banjal (Langehar), P.O.
Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D.
Division, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.07.2005 without complying the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved
workman is entitled to from the above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
___________
In the Court of Shri Arindam Chaudhary, IAS, Marriage Officer-cum-S.D.M., Hamirpur,
Himachal Pradesh
In the matter of :
Vijay Kumar aged 30 years s/o Shri Nain Singh, r/o Village Mahal, Tehsil Bhoranj, District
Hamirpur (H.P.).
and
2252
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
Kiran aged 18 years d/o Shri Desh Raj, r/o Village Chammb, P.O. Kakkar, Tehsil
Taunidevi, District Hamirpur (H.P.)
. . Applicants.
Versus
General Public
Subject.— Notice under Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Vijay Kumar and Kiran have filed an application under Special Marriage Act, 1954
alongwith affidavit and other documents in the court of undersigned in which they stated that they
intend to solemnized marriage within three Calendar months.
Therefore, the General Public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who
has any objection for this marriage can file the objection personally or in writing before this court
on or before 01-07-2017. The objection received after 01-07-2017 will not be entertained and
marriage will be registered accordingly.
Issued today on 01-06-2017 under my hand and seal of the court.
Seal.
Sd/-
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate,
Hamirpur (H.P.).
__________
[
In the Court of Arindam Chaudhary, IAS, Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate,
Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh
In the matter of :
Subhash Chand aged 34 years s/o Shri Kishori Lal, r/o Village & P.O. Majhog Sultani,
Tehsil & District Hamirpur.
and
Kanta Devi aged 22 years d/o Shri Dasu Ram, r/o Village & P.O. Majhog Sultani, Tehsil &
District Hamirpur
. . Applicants.
Versus
General Public
Subject.— Notice under section 15-16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Subhash Chand and Kanta Devi have filed an application under Special Marriage Act, 1954
alongwith affidavit and other documents in the court of undersigned in which they stated that they
solemnized marriage 20-03-2017.
2253
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
Therefore, the General Public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who
has any objection for this marriage can file the objection personally or in writing before this court
on or before 04-07-2017. The objection received after 04-07-2017 will not be entertained and
marriage will be registered accordingly.
Issued today on 01-06-2017 under my hand and seal of the court.
Seal.
Sd/-
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate,
Hamirpur (H.P.).
__________
In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sundernagar,
District Mandi, H. P.
In the matter of :—
1.
Shri Parvindra s/o Sh. Desh Raj, r/o Village Khataula, P.O. Harsoli, Tehsil and District
Muzaffarnagar, U.P. presently residing at Sai Industry, Village Bhour, P.O. Kanaid,
Tehsil Sundernagar, District Mandi, H.P.
2.
Pooja d/o Shri Jasbira, r/o V.P.O. Harsoli, Tehsil and District Muzaffarnagar, U.P.
presently wife of Shri Parvindra s/o Sh. Desh Raj, r/o Sai Industry, Village Bhour, P.O.
Kanaid, Tehsil Sundernagar, District Mandi, H.P.
. . Applicants.
Versus
General Public
.. Respondent.
Subject.—Application for registration of marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act 1954.
Notice :
Shri Parvindra and Pooja applicants have filed an application alongwith affidavits in the
court of undersigned under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have solemnized
their marriage on 27-05-2017 according to Hindu rites and ceremonies and they are living together
as husband and wife since then, hence, their marriage may be registered under Special Marriage
Act, 1954.
Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who
has any objection regarding this marriage, can file the objection personally or in writing before this
court on or before 07-07-2017 after that no objection will be entertained and marriage will be
registered.
Issued today on 29-05-2017 under my hand and seal of the court.
Seal.
RAJIV KUMAR (HPAS),
Marriage Office-cum-SDM,
Sundernagar, District Mandi (H.P.).
2254
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
In The Court of Shri Hemis Negi, H.A.S., Sub Divisional Magistrate Shimla (Urban),
District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh
Shri O. P. Oberoi s/o Late Shri Sita Ram Oberoi, r/o House No. 128, Sector 12, Panchkula
. . Applicant.
Versus
General Public
.. Respondent.
Application under section 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969.
Whereas Shri O. P. Oberoi s/o Late Shri Sita Ram Oberoi, r/o House No. 128, Sector 12,
Panchkula has preferred an application to the undersigned for registration the date of birth of his
daughter namely Upsana Oberoi (DOB 15-5-1970) in the record of Municipal Corporation, Shimla.
Therefore, this proclamation, the General Public is hereby informed that any person having
and objection for entry as to date of birth mentioned above, may submit his objection in writing in
this court on or before 6-7-2017 failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of date
and will be decided accordingly.
Given under my hand and seal of the Court on this 6th day of June, 2017.
Seal.
HEMIS NEGI,
Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Shimla (Urban).
__________
In the Court of Shri Gian Sagar Negi, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Shimla (R),
District Shimla (H. P.)
Shri Tsering Dorjee s/o Shri Damdul, r/o House No. E-106, Tibetan Colony, Panthaghatti,
Tehsil & District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.
Versus
General Public
. . Respondent.
Whereas Shri Tsering Dorjee s/o Shri Damdul, r/o House No. E-106, Tibetan Colony,
Panthaghatti, Tehsil & District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh has filed an application along with
affidavit in the court of undersigned under section 13(3) of the Birth & Death Registration Act,
1969 to enter the date of birth of his Nephew named—Shri Tenzin Passang s/o Lt. Shri Kunsang
Choephel, r/o House No. E-106, Tibetan Colony, Panthaghatti, Tehsil & District Shimla, Himachal
Pradesh in the record of Secy., Birth and Death, Municipal Corporation, Shimla.
2255
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
Sl.
No.
Name of the family member
Relation
Date of Birth
1.
Mr. Tenzin Passang
Nephew
12-04-1981
Hence, this proclamation is issued to the general public if they have any objection/claim
regarding enter the name & date of birth of above named in the record of Municipal Corporation,
Shimla may file their claims/objections on or before one month of publication of this notice in
Govt. Gazette in this court, failing which necessary orders will be passed.
Issued today 12-06-2017 under my signature and seal of the court.
Seal.
GIAN SAGAR NEGI,
Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Shimla (R), District Shimla.
__________
In the Court of Shri Gian Sagar Negi, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Shimla (R),
District Shimla (H. P.)
Shri Palden s/o Lt. Shri Sonam, r/o House No. 4, Tibetan Colony, Panthaghatti, Tehsil &
District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.
Versus
General Public
. . Respondent.
Whereas Shri Palden s/o Lt. Shri Sonam, r/o House No. 4, Tibetan Colony, Panthaghatti,
Tehsil & District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh has filed an application along with affidavit in the
court of undersigned under section 13(3) of the Birth & Death Registration Act, 1969 to enter the
date of birth of his Daughter named—Ms. Tenzin Dolma d/o Shri Palden s/o Lt. Shri Sonam, r/o
House No. 4, Tibetan Colony, Panthaghatti, Tehsil & District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh in the
record of Secy., Birth and Death, Municipal Corporation, Shimla.
Sl.
No.
Name of the family member
Relation
Date of Birth
1.
Ms. Tenzin Dolma
Daughter
01-05-1971
Hence, this proclamation is issued to the general public if they have any objection/claim
regarding enter the name & date of birth of above named in the record of Municipal Corporation,
Shimla may file their claims/objections on or before one month of publication of this notice in
Govt. Gazette in this court, failing which necessary orders will be passed.
Issued today 12-06-2017 under my signature and seal of the court.
Seal.
GIAN SAGAR NEGI,
Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Shimla (R), District Shimla.
2256
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
c vnkyr Jh ujksre yky] lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh] js.kqdkth fLFkr laxMkg]
ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0
fely ua0 % 04@2017
rkjh[k is'kh % 01&07&2017
Jh jkts'k dqekj iq= Jh eydw iq= ukt:] fuoklh jtkuk] rglhy js.kqdkth] ftyk fljekSj] fg0iz0
cuke
vke turk@lxs lEcU/kh
fo"k;-&&n[okLr cjk;s lsgrukekA
mijksDr izkFkZuk i= Jh jkts'k dqekj iq= Jh eydw iq= ukt:] fuoklh jtkuk] rglhy js.kqdkth]
ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0 us bl vk'k; ds lkFk xqtkjk gS fd mldk uke jkts'k dqekj gS tks fd f'k{kk
foHkkx] ifjokj jftLVj esa lgh ntZ gS ijUrq jktLo fjdkMZ ekStk jtkuk esa mldk uke jktsUnz flag ntZ
gS tks fd xyr ntZ gS rFkk ftldh og dkxtkr eky esa n#Lrh djokuk pkgrk gSA
vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl lEcU/k esa ;fn fdlh O;fDr
dks dksbZ mtj ;k ,rjkt gks rks og Lo;a vFkok vius izfrfuf/k }kjk fefr 01&07&2017 dks lqcg 10 cts
gekjh vnkyr esa mifLFkr gksdj mtj@,rjkt izLrqr dj ldrk gS ckn xqtjus fe;kn dksbZ mtj dkcys
xkSj u gksxk rFkk vnkyr ls uke n#Lrh ckjs vko';d vkns'k ikfjr dj fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 30&05&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj ,oa eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh fd;k x;kA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh]
js.kqdkth fLFkr laxMkg] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&
c vnkyr Jh ujksre yky] dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh] js.kqdkth fLFkr laxMkg]
ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0
fely ua0 % 11@2017
rkjh[k is'kh % 01&07&2017
Jh osn izdk'k iq= Jh lfu;k jke] fuoklh j.kQqvk] rglhy js.kqdkth] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0
cuke
vke turk
fo"k;-&&tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k ntZ djus ckjs izkFkZuk&i=A
mijksDr izkFkZuk&i= Jh osn izdk'k iq= Jh lfu;k jke] fuoklh j.kQqvk] rglhy js.kqdkth] ftyk
fljekSj] fg0 iz0 us v/khu /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969 ds vUrxZr izLrqr djds
izkFkZuk dh gS fd mlds iq= vadq'k ftldh tUe frfFk 26&10&2011 gS tks xzke iapk;r j.kQqvk ds fjdkMZ
esa ntZ ugha djok;k x;k gSA ftls izkFkhZ vc ntZ djokuk pkgrk gSA
2257
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl lEcU/k esa ;fn fdlh O;fDr
dks dksbZ mtj ;k ,rjkt gks rks og Lo;a vFkok vius izfrfuf/k }kjk fefr 01&07&2017 dks lqcg 10 cts
gekjh vnkyr esa mifLFkr gksdj mtj@,rjkt izLrqr dj ldrk gS ckn xqtjus fe;kn dksbZ mtj
dkfcys xkSj u gksxk rFkk lk;y ds iq= vadq'k dh tUe frfFk ntZ djus ds vkns'k tkjh dj fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 30&05&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh fd;k x;kA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]
js.kqdkth fLFkr laxMkg] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&
c vnkyr Jh ujksre yky] dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh] js.kqdkth fLFkr laxMkg]
ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0
fely ua0 % 10@2017
rkjh[k is'kh % 01&07&2017
Jherh nqjek nsoh iRuh Jh lqHkk"k pUn] fuoklh vokaBk] Mk0 lkaxuk] rglhy js.kqdkth] ftyk
fljekSj] fg0 iz0A
cuke
vke turk
fo"k;-&&tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k ntZ djus ckjs izkFkZuk&i=A
mijksDr izkFkZuk&i= Jherh nqjek nsoh iRuh Jh lqHkk"k pUn] fuoklh vokaBk] Mk0 lkaxuk] rglhy
js.kqdkth] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0 us v/khu /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969 ds vUrxZr
izLrqr djds izkFkZuk dh gS fd mldh iq=h J`f"V ftldh tUe frfFk 31&10&2013 gS tks xzke iapk;r
lkaxuk ds fjdkMZ esa ntZ ugha gSA ftls izkfFkZ;k vc ntZ djokuk pkgrh gSA
vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl lEcU/k esa ;fn fdlh O;fDr
dks dksbZ mtj ;k ,rjkt gks rks og Lo;a vFkok vius izfrfuf/k }kjk fefr 01&07&2017 dks lqcg 10 cts
gekjh vnkyr esa mifLFkr gksdj mtj@,rjkt izLrqr dj ldrk gS ckn xqtjus fe;kn dksbZ mtj
dkfcys xkSj u gksxk rFkk lk;y dh iq=h J`f"V dh tUe frfFk ntZ djus ds vkns'k tkjh dj fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 30&05&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh fd;k x;kA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]
js.kqdkth fLFkr laxMkg] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A
2258
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
c vnkyr lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh] js.kqdkth fLFkr laxMkg]
ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0
fely ua0 % 05@2017
rkjh[k ejtqvk % 22&5&2017
rkjh[k is'kh % 01&07&2017
Jh ijekuUn iq= Jh thr flag iq= daBh jke] fuoklh jtkuk] rglhy js.kqdkth] ftyk fljekSj]
fg0 iz0
- - izkFkhZx.kA
cuke
vke turk@lxs lEcU/kh
- - izfroknhx.kA
fo"k;-&n[okLr cjk;s lsgr uke jktLo fjdkMZ ekStk <ky iykjk] rglhy jS.kqdkth] ftyk fljekSj] fg0iz0
izkFkhZ mijksDr us vnkyr gtk esa ,d nj[okLr xqtkjh fd mldk uke ijekuUn gS tks fd f'k{kk
foHkkx] iapk;r fjdkMZ ,oa vk/kkj dkMZ esa lgh ntZ gS ijUrq jktLo fjdkMZ ekStk <ky iykjk esa mldk
uke izse flag ntZ gS tks fd xyr ntZ gS rFkk ftldh og jktLo fjdkMZ esa n#Lrh djokuk pkgrk gSA
vr% bl vnkyrh b'rgkj ds ek/;e ls vke turk@lxs lEcfU/k;ksa dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd
vxj izkFkhZ mijksDr dk uke jktLo fjdkMZ ekStk <ky iykjk] iVokj o`r dkdksx esa ntZ djus ckjs fdlh
O;fDr dks dksbZ mtj ,oa ,rjkt gks rks og fnukad 01&07&2017 dks izkr% 10 cts gekjh vnkyr esa
vlkyru@odkyru gkftj vkdj mtj ,oa ,rjkt izLrqr dj ldrk gS ckn xqtjus fe;kn dksbZ
dk;Zokgh dkfcys lek;r u gksxh rFkk fu;ekuqlkj vko';d vkns'k ikfjr dj fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 30&05&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj ,oa eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh fd;k x;kA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh]
js.kqdkth fLFkr laxMkg] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&
c vnkyr Jh ujksre yky] dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh] js.kqdkth fLFkr laxMkg]
ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0
fely ua0 % 08@2017
rkjh[k is'kh % 01&07&2017
Jh fouksn dqekj iq= ghjk flag] fuoklh fVdjh] rglhy js.kqdkth] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0
cuke
vke turk
fo"k;-&&tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k ntZ djus ckjs izkFkZuk&i=A
mijksDr izkFkZuk&i= Jh fouksn dqekj iq= ghjk flag] fuoklh fVdjh] rglhy js.kqdkth] ftyk
fljekSj] fg0 iz0 us v/khu /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969 ds vUrxZr izLrqr djds
izkFkZuk dh gS fd mlds nknk gqDeh jke iq= 'kadj ftldh e`R;q frfFk 01&01&2013 gS dk uke xzke
iapk;r laxMkg ds fjdkMZ esa ntZ ugha gSA ftls izkFkhZ vc ntZ djokuk pkgrk gSA
2259
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl lEcU/k esa fdlh O;fDr dks
dksbZ mtj ;k ,rjkt gks rks og Lo;a vFkok vius izfrfuf/k }kjk fefr 01&07&2017 dks lqcg 10 cts
gekjh vnkyr esa mifLFkr gksdj mtj@,rjkt izLrqr dj ldrk gS ckn xqtjus fe;kn dksbZ mtj
dkfcys xkSj u gksxk rFkk lk;y ds nknk gqDeh dh e`R;q frfFk ntZ djus ds vkns'k tkjh dj fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 30&05&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh fd;k x;kA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]
js.kqdkth fLFkr laxMkg] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&&&
c vnkyr Jh ek;k jke 'kekZ] mi&iathiky f'kykbZ] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0
xqeku flag iq= Jh uSu flag] fuoklh xzke ckscjh] rglhy f'kykbZ
dqUnu flag iq= Jh uSu flag] fuoklh xzke ckscjh] rglhy f'kykbZ
cuke
vke vknehA
3- Jherh NVks nsoh iRuh Jh uSu flag] fuoklh xzke ckscjh] rglhy f'kykbZA
4- Jherh fdj.k ckyk iq=h Jh uSu flag] fuoklh xzke ckscjh] rglhy f'kykbZA
izkFkZuk&i= fd;s tkus ckjs iathd`r olh;rukek (unregistered) tsj /kkjk 40&41 ds vUrxZrA
bl b'rgkj ds }kjk vkidks voxr djk;k tkrk gS fd xqeku flag iq= Jh uSu flag] fuoklh xzke
ckscjh] rglhy f'kykbZ] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0 }kjk ,d olh;rukek bl U;k;ky; esa izLrqr dj fuosnu
fd;k gS fd muds firk Jh uSu flag }kjk vius thou dky esa ,d olh;r [kke rgjhj dh gS vc uSu
flag iq= [;kyw jke dh e`R;q gks pqdh gS vc olh;r dks xqeku flag o dqUnu flag iq= uSu flag
jftLVªs'ku ,DV dh /kkjk 40&41 ds vUrxZr iathd`r fd;k tk,A vr% bl b'rgkj }kjk vke o [kkl dks
lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd fdlh dks dksbZ vkifÙk gks rks og fnukad 04&07&2017 dks vlkyru ;k
odkyru gkftj vnkyr gksdj viuk ,rjkt is'k dj ldrk gSA gkftj u vkus dh fLFkfr esa dk;Zokgh
,drjQk vey esa ykbZ tk,xhA
vkt fnukad 27&05&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj lfgr tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
mi&iathiky]
f'kykbZ] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&&&
In the Court of Shri H. S. Rana, H.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate
Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh
NOTICE UNDER SECTION 16 OF SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT, 1954
In the matter of :
1.
Shri Tarun Kumar s/o Shri Ram Swaroop, r/o Village Bharog Baneri, Tehsil Paonta
Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P.
2260
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
2.
Smt. Neelam Kumari d/o Shri Tula Ram, r/o Village Korga, Sub-Tehsil Kamrau,
District Sirmaur, H.P.
Versus
General Public
Application for the registration of Marriage under Section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954
(Central Act) as amended by Marriage Laws (Amendment Act 01, 49 of 2001).
Shri Tarun Kumar s/o Shri Ram Swaroop, r/o Village Bharog Baneri, Tehsil Paonta Sahib,
District Sirmaur, H.P. and Smt. Neelam Kumari d/o Shri Tula Ram, r/o Village Korga, Sub-
Tehsil Kamrau, District Sirmaur, H.P have filed an application alongwith affidavits in this court
under section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 on dated 01-06-2017 stating therein that they have
been solemnized their marriage on 07-05-2017 at their residence Paonta Sahib and they have living
together as husband and wife ever since then. Hence notices are given to all concerend and general
public to this effect that if any body have any objection regarding the registration of marriage duly
solemnized on 7-5-2017 between Shri Tarun Kumar s/o Shri Ram Swaroop, r/o Village Bharog
Baneri, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P. and Smt. Neelam Kumari d/o Shri Tula Ram,
r/o Village Korga, Sub-Tehsil Kamrau, District Sirmaur, H.P. he should file written objections and
appear personally or through an authorized agent before this court within 30 days from the date of
issue of this notice. After expiry of the said period, the marriage certificate would be issued to the
applicants by this court.
Issued under my hand and office seal of this court on 01-06-2017.
Seal.
HARI SINGH RANA (HAS),
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur.
__________
In the Court of Shri H. S. Rana, H.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate
Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh
NOTICE UNDER SECTION 16 OF SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT, 1954
In the matter of :
1.
Shri Rohit s/o Shri Vidya Dutt Bhardwaj, r/o ward No. 11, House No. 94/1 badri
Nagar, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P.
2.
Smt. Ekta d/o Shri Umesh Sharma, r/o Village Seithba, District Kanpur, UP.
Versus
General Public
2261
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
Application for the registration of Marriage under Section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954
(Central Act) as amended by Marriage Laws (Amendment Act 01, 49 of 2001).
Shri Rohit s/o Shri Vidya Dutt Bhardwaj, r/o ward No. 11, House No. 94/1 badri Nagar,
Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P. and Smt. Ekta d/o Shri Umesh Sharma, r/o Village Seithba,
District Kanpur, UP have filed an application alongwith affidavits in this court under section 16 of
Special Marriage Act, 1954 on dated 31-05-2017 stating therein that they have been solemnized
their marriage on 12-12-2016 at their residence Paonta Sahib and they have living together as
husband and wife ever since then. Hence notices are given to all concerend and general public to
this effect that if any body have any objection regarding the registration of marriage duly
solemnized on 12-12-2016 between Shri Rohit s/o Shri Vidya Dutt Bhardwaj, r/o ward No. 11,
House No. 94/1 badri Nagar, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P. and Smt. Ekta d/o Shri Umesh
Sharma, r/o Village Seithba, District Kanpur, UP he should file written objections and appear
personally or through an authorized agent before this court within 30 days from the date of issue of
this notice. After expiry of the said period, the marriage certificate would be issued to the
applicants by this court.
Issued under my hand and office seal of this court on 01-06-2017.
Seal.
HARI SINGH RANA (HAS),
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur.
__________
c vnkyr Jh Mh0 vkj0 HkkfV;k] rglhynkj ,oa dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh] ukykx<+]
ftyk lksyu] fg0 iz0
eq0 ua0 % 8@2017
Jherh fueZyk nsoh
cuke
vke turk
izkFkZuk&i= tsjs /kjk 13¼3½ fg0 iz0 iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969-
uksfVl cuke vke turkA
Jherh fueZyk nsoh iq=h Jh izhre flag] fuoklh iYyh ¼xqjnkliqjk½ rglhy ukykx<+] ftyk lksyu
us bl vnkyr esa 'kiFk&i= lfgr eqdíek nk;j fd;k gS fd mldh ekrk I;kjh nsoh dh e`R;q fnukad
8&1&1972 dks gqbZ gS ijUrq xzke iapk;r cxySgM esa e`R;q iathd`r u gSA vr% bls iathd`r fd;s tkus ds
vkns'k fn;s tk;sa A
2262
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939
vr% bl uksfVl ds }kjk leLr turk dks rFkk lEcfU/kr lEcfU/k;ksa dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd
;fn fdlh dks mijksDr I;kjh nsoh dh e`R;q frfFk iathdj.k fd;s tkus ckjs dksbZ ,rjkt gks rks og viuk
,rjkt gekjh vnkyr esa fnukad 15&7&2017 dks vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj vkdj is'k dj ldrk gSA
vU;Fkk e`rkfcd 'kiFk&i= e`R;q frfFk iathd`r fd;s tkus ckjs vkns'k ikfjr dj fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 15&6&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh fd;k x;kA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
rglhynkj ,oa dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]
ukykx<+] ftyk lksyu ¼fg0 iz0½A
fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr
bysDVªkWfud gLrk{kfjr jkti=] oSclkbV http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in ij miyC/k gS ,oe~ vkWuykbu lR;kfir fd;k tk ldrk gS