jkti=] fgekpy izns'k

fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr

lkseokj] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

fgekpy izns'k ljdkj

INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT

A-Section

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171002, the 12th June, 2017

No.Ind-A(A)1-1/2017.—The Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to order to

establish a new Mining Office at Nurpur, Distt. Kangra, with immediate effect with the areas of

Nurpur, Fatehpur and Jawali Sub-Divisions under its jurisdiction.

56&jkti=@2017&19&06&2017

¼2217½

2218

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

The Governor, Himachal Pradesh is also pleased to create following posts for the above

Mining Office at Nurpur:—

Sr.

No.

Name of Post

No. of post(s)

Pay Band

1.

Mining Officer

01

Rs.10300-34800 + 4200 GP

2.

Mining Inspector

01

Rs. 5910-20200 + 2800 GP

3.

Assistant Mining Inspector

01

Rs. 5910-20200 + 2400 GP

By order,

Sd/-

Addl. Chief Secretary (Inds.).

_____________

HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-02, the 14th June, 2017

No. EDN-A-Ka(1)-32/2007-Loose.—The following Government Degree College(s) have

been newly opened with effect from 2017-18 i.e. from the session June, 2017 :—

(a) Government Degree College Telka, Distt. Chamba (H.P.).

(b) Government Degree College Bhallai, Distt. Chamba (H.P.).

(c) Government Degree College Matour, Distt. Kangra (H.P.).

(d) Government Degree College Dehra, Distt. Kangra (H.P.).

(e) Government Degree College Haroli, Distt. Una (H.P.).

(f) Government Degree College Jainagar, Distt. Solan (H.P.).

(g) Government Degree College Darlaghat, Distt. Solan (H.P.).

The Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to order the creation of following teaching

and non-teaching posts for the above mentioned each newly opened Government Degree

College:—

Sr.

No

Category/Name of

Post(s) (For each College)

No of

Post(s)

Pay Band/Scale

1.

Principal

01x7=7

Rs. 37400-67000+GP 10000

2219

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

2.

Assistant Professor :—

(a) English

(b) Hindi

(c) History

(d) Pol. Science

(e) Economics

(f) Commerce

01 x7=7

01 x7=7

01 x7=7

01 x7=7

01 x7=7

02x7=14

Rs. 15600-39100 + GP 6000 (For

regular appointee)

Rs. 15600 + 6000 = 21600/-PM (For

contract appointee)

3.

Librarian (College Cadre)

01 x7=7

Rs. 15600-39100 + GP 6000 (For

regular appointee)

Rs. 15600 + 6000 = 21600/-PM

(For contract appointee)

4.

Superintendent Gr-II

01 x7=7

Rs. 10300-34800+ GP- 4800

5.

Senior Assistant

01 x7=7

Rs. 10300-34800+ GP- 4400

6.

Junior Office Assistant

02x7=14

Rs. 5910+GP-1950 = 7860/-PM (For

Contract appointee)

7.

Peon

03 x7=21

Rs. 4900+GP-1300 = 6200/-PM (For

Contract appointee)

Rs. 4900-10680+ GP- 1300 (For initial

two years of regular service)

Rs. 4900-10680+ GP- 1650 (Given after

2 years of regular service)

8.

Chowkidar

02 x7=14

Rs. 4900+GP-1300 = 6200/-PM (For

Contract appointee)

Rs. 4900-10680+ GP- 1300 (For initial

two years of regular service)

Rs. 4900-10680+ GP- 1650 (Given after

2 years of regular service)

Total Posts

18 x7=126

The expenditure will be incurred under Major Head 2202-03-103-01-Soon-Non- Plan for

smooth functioning of these colleges.

This issues with prior concurrence of the Fin. Department obtained vide their U.O No

53988501-Fin-E/2017, dated 04th June, 2017 and in the Cabinet meeting held on 05th June, 2017.

By order,

Sd/-

Addl. Chief Secretary(Education).

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 20th January, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Jag Dev S/O Shri Nanak Chand, R/O

Village and Post Office Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice

dated 28.5.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,

2220

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-

Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,

but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent

a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,

H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,

District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate

Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of

more than 12 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 15.2.2014;

And whereas Shri Jag Dev S/O Shri Nanak Chand agitated the above orders of declining of

reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4686/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the civil writ petition on 24.12.2015 and directed the respondent to take appropriate

action in accordance with law positively within a period of four weeks. The operative part of the

judgment is reproduced as follows;

“3 In view of the settled position of law, the impugned orders are thus legally not

sustainable. Consequently, impugned orders Annexures P-1, P-2 and P-3 are quashed and

set aside with the direction to respondent No.-2 to take appropriate action in accordance

with law. Needful be positively done within a period of four weeks from the date of

production of certified copy of the judgment.

With the aforesaid observations, present petition stands disposed of, so also pending

application(s), if any.’

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Jag Dev S/O Shri Nanak Chand,

R/O Village and Post Office Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. before the

Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba,

H.P. vide demand notice dated 28.5.2012 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service

during August, 1999 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the

services of Shri Jag Dev S/O Shri Nanak Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Purthi, Tehsil

Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division,

Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during August, 1999 without complying the

provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of

back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved

workman is entitled to from the above employer?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

2221

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 20th January, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Ajeet Kumar S/O Shri Babu Ram,

R/O Village and Post Office Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand

notice dated 2.1.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,

I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-

Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,

but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent

a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,

H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,

District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as

appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order

dated 7.10.2015;

And whereas Shri Ajeet Kumar S/O Shri Babu Ram agitated the above orders of declining

of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4686/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the civil writ petition on 24.12.2015 and directed the respondent to take appropriate

action in accordance with law positively within a period of four weeks. The operative part of the

judgment is reproduced as follows;

“3 In view of the settled position of law, the impugned orders are thus legally not

sustainable. Consequently, impugned orders Annexures P-1, P-2 and P-3 are quashed and

set aside with the direction to respondent No.-2 to take appropriate action in accordance

with law. Needful be positively done within a period of four weeks from the date of

production of certified copy of the judgment.

With the aforesaid observations, present petition stands disposed of, so also pending

application(s), if any.’

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Ajeet Kumar S/O Shri Babu Ram,

R/O Village and Post Office Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. before the

Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba,

H.P. vide demand notice dated 2.1.2012 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service

during August, 2004 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the

services of Shri Ajeet Kumar S/O Shri Babu Ram, R/O Village and Post Office Dharwas,

Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D.

Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during August, 2004 without

complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not,

2222

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above

aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Devi Chand S/O Shri Munshi Ram,

R/O Village Salga, P.O. Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice

dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from back date

by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour

Officercum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial

dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings,

where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour

Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,

District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as

appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he

should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute

vide order dated 19.09.2015;

And whereas Shri Devi Chand S/O Shri Munshi Ram, agitated the above orders of declining

of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to

make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part

of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ

petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if

any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

2223

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

1

“Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Devi Chand S/O Shri

Munshi Ram, R/O Village Salga, P.O. Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P.

during the year 1995 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division,

Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and

has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated

30.03.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is

legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7

years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past

service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/

management?”

2

“Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand

notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Devi Chand S/O Shri Munshi

Ram, R/O Village Salga, P.O. Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be fulfilled

by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. from the

date his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is legal and

justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service benefits the

above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Dumnu S/O Shri Lachho, R/O

Village and Post Office Kohladi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice

dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from back date

by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-

cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute

amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where

after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour

Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,

District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as

appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he

should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute

vide order dated 19.09.2015;

2224

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

And whereas Shri Dumnu S/O Shri Lachho, agitated the above orders of declining of

reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to

make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part

of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ

petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if

any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

1

“Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Dumnu S/O Shri Lachho,

R/O Village and Post Office Kohladi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during the year

1996 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District

Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his

industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014,

without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and

justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7 years in

raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service

benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”

2

“Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand

notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Dumnu S/O Shri Lachho, R/O

Village and Post Office Kohladi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be fulfilled by

Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. from the date

his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is legal and

justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service benefits the

above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Kamal Lal S/O Shri Karam Chand,

R/O Village and Post Office Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice

dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from back date

2225

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-

cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute

amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where

after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour

Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,

District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as

appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he

should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute

vide order dated 19.09.2015;

And whereas Shri Kamal Lal S/O Shri Karam Chand, agitated the above orders of declining

of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to

make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part

of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ

petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if

any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

1

“Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Kamal Lal S/O Shri

Karam Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P.

during the year 1997 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division,

Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and

has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated

30.03.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is

legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7

years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past

service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/

management?”

2

“Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand

notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Kamal Lal S/O Shri Karam

Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be

fulfilled by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P.

from the date his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is

2226

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

legal and justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service

benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Mohinder Kumar S/O Shri Hachhu

Ram, R/O Village Dugli, P.O. Khundel, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand

notice dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from

back date by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The

Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the

industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation

proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,

District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as

appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he

should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute

vide order dated 19.09.2015;

And whereas Shri Mohinder Kumar S/O Shri Hachhu Ram, agitated the above orders of

declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High

Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal

Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour

Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunalcum-Labour Court within six

weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ

petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if

any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

2227

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

1.

“Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Mohinder Kumar S/O

Shri Hachhu Ram, R/O Village Dugli, P.O. Khundel, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P.

during the year 1995 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division,

Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and

has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated

30.03.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is

legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7

years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past

service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/

management?”

2

“Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand

notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Mohinder Kumar S/O Shri

Hachhu Ram, R/O Village Dugli, P.O. Khundel, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to

be fulfilled by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P.

from the date his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is

legal and justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service

benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Rakesh Kumar S/O Shri Hans Raj,

R/O Village and Post Office Saru, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice

dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from back date

by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-

cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute

amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where

after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour

Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,

District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as

appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he

should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute

vide order dated 19.09.2015;

And whereas Shri Rakesh Kumar S/O Shri Hans Raj, agitated the above orders of declining

of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to

make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part

of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

2228

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ

petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if

any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

1

“Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Rakesh Kumar S/O Shri

Hans Raj, R/O Village and Post Office Saru, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during

the year 1997 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba,

District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised

his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014,

without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and

justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7 years in

raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service

benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”

2

“Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand

notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Rakesh Kumar S/O Shri Hans

Raj, R/O Village and Post Office Saru, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be fulfilled

by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. from the

date his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is legal and

justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service benefits the

above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Ramesh Kumar S/O Shri Kishan

Chand, R/O Village Udaipur, P.O. Saru, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand

notice dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination/regularization of services from back

date by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour

Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial

dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings,

where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour

Commissioner, H.P.;

2229

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,

District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as

appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he

should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute

vide order dated 19.09.2015;

And whereas Shri Ramesh Kumar S/O Shri Kishan Chand, agitated the above orders of

declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High

Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal

Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour

Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six

weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ

petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if

any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

1

“Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Ramesh Kumar S/O Shri

Kishan Chand, R/O Village Udaipur, P.O. Saru, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P.

during the year 1997 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division,

Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and

has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated

30.03.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is

legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7

years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past

service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/

management?”

2

“Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand

notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Ramesh Kumar S/O Shri

Kishan Chand, R/O Village Udaipur, P.O. Saru, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be

fulfilled by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P.

from the date his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is

legal and justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service

benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

2230

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Subhash S/O Shri Hem Chand, R/O

Village Millah, P.O. Singi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated

30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from back date by the

Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer cum-

Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,

but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent

a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,

H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,

District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as

appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he

should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute

vide order dated 19.09.2015;

And whereas Shri Subhash S/O Shri Hem Chand, agitated the above orders of declining of

reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to

make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part

of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ

petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if

any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

1

“Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Subhash S/O Shri Hem

Chand, R/O Village Millah, P.O. Singi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during the

year 1997 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba,

District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised

his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014,

without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and

justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7 years in

raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service

benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”

2231

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

2

“Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand

notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Subhash S/O Shri Hem Chand,

R/O Village Millah, P.O. Singi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be fulfilled by

Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. from the date

his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is legal and

justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service benefits the

above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Suresh Kumar S/O Shri Gajlo Ram,

R/O Village Bhanota, P.O. Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice

dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from back date

by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-

cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute

amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where

after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour

Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,

District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as

appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he

should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute

vide order dated 21.09.2015;

And whereas Shri Suresh Kumar S/O Shri Gajlo Ram, agitated the above orders of

declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High

Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal

Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour

Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six

weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ

petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if

any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

2232

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

1

“Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Suresh Kumar S/O Shri

Gajlo Ram, R/O Village Bhanota, P.O. Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P.

during the year 1997 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division,

Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and

has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated

30.03.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is

legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7

years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past

service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/

management?”

2

“Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand

notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Suresh Kumar S/O Shri Gajlo

Ram, R/O Village Bhanota, P.O. Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be

fulfilled by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P.

from the date his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is

legal and justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service

benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Tilak Raj S/O Shri Ghunghar Ram,

R/O Village Dhar, P.O. Khundel, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice

dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from back date

by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer

cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute

amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where

after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour

Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,

District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as

appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he

should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute

vide order dated 19.09.2015;

And whereas Shri Tilak Raj S/O Shri Ghunghar Ram, agitated the above orders of declining

of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

2233

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to

make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part

of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ

petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if

any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

1

“Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Tilak Raj S/O Shri

Ghunghar Ram, R/O Village Dhar, P.O. Khundel, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P.

during the year 1998 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division,

Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and

has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated

30.03.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is

legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7

years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past

service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/

management?”

2

“Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand

notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Tilak Raj S/O Shri Ghunghar

Ram, R/O Village Dhar, P.O. Khundel, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be fulfilled

by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. from the

date his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is legal and

justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service benefits the

above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016

No. 11-1/7(Lab) ID/2015-Joginder Nagar.—Whereas Shri Megh Singh S/O Shri Gawanu

Ram, R/O Village and Post Office Gwali, Tehsil Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand

notice dated 02.01.2013 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Senior Executive

2234

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B. Limited, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. The

Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the

industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation

proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Joginder

Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as

appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of more than 13 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order

dated 3.12.2013;

And whereas Shri Megh Singh S/O Shri Gawanu Ram agitated the above orders of

declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High

Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 164/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal

Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 23.02.2016 and directed the respondents to

consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014, delivered

by Hon’ble High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus

Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the

judgment is reproduced as follows;

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Megh Singh S/O Shri Gawanu Ram, R/O

Village and Post Office Gwali, Tehsil Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 25.03.1999 by the

Senior Executive Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B. Limited, Joginder Nagar,

District Mandi, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages only for 138 days during

years, 1996-99 and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 13 years vide demand

notice dated 02.01.2013, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act,

1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period of 138 days during

years, 1998-99 and delay of more than 13 years in raising the industrial dispute, what

amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-

worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

2235

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Mehar Chand S/O Shri Mahajan Ram,

R/O Village and Post Office Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand

notice dated 05.10.2010 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-

Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but

the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a

report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi,

District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate

Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of

more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 19.3.2013;

And whereas Shri Mehar Chand S/O Shri Mahajan Ram agitated the above orders of

declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High

Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 158/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal

Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 23.2.2016 and directed the respondents to

consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 delivered

by the High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014-titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh

State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is

reproduced as follows;

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions is disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Mehar Chand S/O Shri Mahajan Ram, R/O

Village and Post Office Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. during year, 2003 by

the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P., who had

worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7

years vide demand notice dated 5.10.2010, without complying the provisions of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more

than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past

service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above

employer/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

2236

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 8th March, 2016

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Nand Lal S/O Shri Gurdittu Ram, R/O

Village Khanud, P.O. Khoral, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand

notice dated 18.11.2009 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-

Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but

the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a

report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi,

District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate

Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of

more than 15 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 16.02.2013;

And whereas Shri Nand Lal S/O Shri Gurdittu Ram agitated the above orders of declining

of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 68 of 2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the civil writ petition on 6.1.2016 and directed the Labour Commissioner to make

reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the

judgment is reproduced as follows;

“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash impugned order, dated

20.03.2012 (Annexure P-1) and direct the Labour Commissioner to make reference to the

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly.

4 The writ petition is disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, alongwith all pending

applications.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Nand Lal S/O Shri Gurdittu Ram,

R/O Village Khanud, P.O. Khoral, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. before the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. vide demand

notice dated 18.11.2009 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during April,

1994 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri

Nand Lal S/O Shri Gurdittu Ram, R/O Village Khanud, P.O. Khoral, Tehsil Sunder Nagar,

District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar,

District Mandi, H.P. during April, 1994 without complying the provisions of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority,

past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the

above employer?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

2237

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 8th March, 2016

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Sita Ram S/O Shri Dalela Ram, R/O

Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand

notice dated 17.8.2010 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-

Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but

the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a

report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi,

District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate

Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of

more than 12 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 19.3.2012;

And whereas Shri Sita Ram S/O Shri Dalela Ram agitated the above orders of declining of

reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 68 of 2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the civil writ petition on 6.1.2016 and directed the Labour Commissioner to make

reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the

judgment is reproduced as follows;

“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash impugned order, dated

20.03.2012 (Annexure P-1) and direct the Labour Commissioner to make reference to the

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly.

4 The writ petition is disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, alongwith all pending

applications.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Sita Ram S/O Shri Dalela Ram,

R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. before the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. vide demand

notice dated 17.08.2010 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during February,

1998 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Sita

Ram S/O Shri Dalela Ram, R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District

Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District

Mandi, H.P. during February, 1998 without complying the provisions of the Industrial

2238

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past

service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the

above employer?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 8th March, 2016

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Rattan Lal S/O Shri Garja Ram, R/O

Village Sanihal, P.O. Dhawala, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand

notice dated 17.8.2010 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-

Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but

the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a

report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi,

District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate

Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of

more than 12 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 16.02.2013;

And whereas Shri Rattan Lal S/O Shri Garja Ram agitated the above orders of declining of

reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 68 of 2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the civil writ petition on 6.1.2016 and directed the Labour Commissioner to make

reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the

judgment is reproduced as follows;

“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash impugned order, dated

20.03.2012 (Annexure P-1) and direct the Labour Commissioner to make reference to the

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly.

4 The writ petition is disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, alongwith all pending

applications.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

2239

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Rattan Lal S/O Shri Garja Ram,

R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Dhawala, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. before the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. vide demand

notice dated 17.08.2010 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during July,

1998 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri

Rattan Lal S/O Shri Garja Ram, R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Dhawala, Tehsil Sunder Nagar,

District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar,

District Mandi, H.P. during July, 1998 without complying the provisions of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past

service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the

above employer?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 8th March, 2016

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Tek Chand S/O Shri Lekh Ram, R/O

Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand

notice dated 17.8.2010 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-

Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but

the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a

report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi,

District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate

Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of

more than 11 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 19.03.2012;

And whereas Shri Tek Chand S/O Shri Lekh Ram agitated the above orders of declining of

reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 68 of 2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the civil writ petition on 6.1.2016 and directed the Labour Commissioner to make

reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the

judgment is reproduced as follows;

“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash impugned order, dated

20.03.2012 (Annexure P-1) and direct the Labour Commissioner to make reference to the

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly.

4 The writ petition is disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, alongwith all pending

applications.”

2240

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Tek Chand S/O Shri Lekh Ram,

R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. before the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. vide demand

notice dated 17.08.2010 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during

September, 1998 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services

of Shri Tek Chand S/O Shri Lekh Ram, R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder

Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder

Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. during September, 1998 without complying the provisions of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,

seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled

to from the above employer?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 8th March, 2016

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Rajesh Kumar S/O Shri Jai Chand,

R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand

notice dated 17.8.2010 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-

Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but

the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a

report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi,

District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate

Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of

more than 12 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 19.03.2012;

And whereas Shri Rajesh Kumar S/O Shri Jai Chand agitated the above orders of declining

of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 68 of 2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the civil writ petition on 6.1.2016 and directed the Labour Commissioner to make

reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the

judgment is reproduced as follows;

2241

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash impugned order, dated

20.03.2012 (Annexure P-1) and direct the Labour Commissioner to make reference to the

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly.

4 The writ petition is disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, alongwith all pending

applications.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Rajesh Kumar S/O Shri Jai

Chand, R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. before

the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. vide

demand notice dated 17.08.2010 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during

August, 1998 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of

Shri Rajesh Kumar S/O Shri Jai Chand, R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder

Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder

Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. during August, 1998 without complying the provisions of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,

seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled

to from the above employer?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Narinder Kumar S/O Shri Nanak

Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Ponto, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a

demand notice dated 02.06.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the

Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The

Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the

industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation

proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,

District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate

Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of

more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 9.10.2014;

2242

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

And whereas Shri Narinder Kumar S/O Shri Nanak Chand agitated the above orders of

declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High

Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 129/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal

Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to

consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014, CWP

No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and

others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Narinder Kumar S/O Shri Nanak Chand,

R/O Village and Post Office Ponto, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September,

2004 by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi,

District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his

industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 02.06.2012, without

complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not,

keeping in view of delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount

of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is

entitled to from the above employer/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 9th March, 2016

No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2015-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Nathu Ram S/O Shri Gurdyal Singh,

R/O Village and Post Office Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand

notice dated 23.07.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation

Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the

same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report

under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

2243

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala,

District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as

appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of about 23 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated

13.11.2014;

And whereas Shri Nathu Ram S/O Shri Gurdyal Singh agitated the above orders of

declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High

Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4864/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal

Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 6.1.2016 and directed the respondents to consider

the case of the petitioner, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 delivered by

Hon’ble High Court of H.P. in a batch of writ petitions, CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap

Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The

operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions is disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Nathu Ram S/O Shri Gurdyal Singh, R/O

Village and Post Office Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during April, 1988 by

the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had

worked as beldar on daily wages only for 197 ½ days and 76 days in year, 1987 & 1988 and

has raised his industrial dispute after about 23 years vide demand notice dated 23.07.2011,

without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified

? If not, keeping in view of working period of 197 ½ days and 76 days in year, 1987 & 1988

respectively and delay of about 23 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of

back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is

entitled to from the above employer/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 16th February, 2016

No. 11-1/7(Lab) ID/2015-Joginder Nagar.—Whereas Shri Om Chand S/O Shri Chhadia,

R/O Village Dharehada, P.O. Pehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand

2244

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

notice dated 22.1.2013 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive

Engineer, B&R Division H.P.P.W.D., Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Inspector-cum-

Conciliation Officer, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute

amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where

after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour

Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Inspector-cum- Conciliation Officer, Joginder

Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as

appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of after about 12 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order

dated 18.3.2015;

And whereas Shri Om Chand S/O Shri Chhadia agitated the above orders of declining of

reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 3282/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the civil writ petition on 30.7.2015 and directed the respondents to consider the case of

the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014 case titled Pratap Chand

versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being the lead case within eight weeks.

The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petition are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending application, if any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Om Chand S/O Shri Chhadia, R/O

Village Dharehada, P.O. Pehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. before the Executive

Engineer, B&R Division H.P.P.W.D., Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. vide demand notice

dated 22.1.2013 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during year, 2001

suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Om

Chand S/O Shri Chhadia, R/O Village Dharehada, P.O. Pehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District

Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, B&R Division H.P.P.W.D., Dharampur, District

Mandi, H.P. during year, 2001 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service

benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above

employer?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

2245

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 8th March, 2016

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Parkash Chand S/O Shri Hari Singh,

R/O Village Chah, P.O. Mandap, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand

notice dated 30.11.2009 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-

Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but

the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a

report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi,

District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate

Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of

more than 9 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 30.03.2012;

And whereas Shri Parkash Chand S/O Shri Hari Singh agitated the above orders of

declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High

Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4633/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal

Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 17.12.2015 and directed the respondents to

consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014, CWP

No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and

others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioner, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions is disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Parkash Chand S/O Shri Hari

Singh, R/O Village Chah, P.O. Mandap, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. before the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. vide demand

notice dated 30.11.2009 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service w.e.f.

01.01.2000 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of

Shri Parkash Chand S/O Shri Hari Singh, R/O Village Chah, P.O. Mandap, Tehsil

Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division,

Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 01.01.2000 without complying the provisions of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,

2246

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled

to from the above employer?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Parwati W/O Shri Ramesh, R/O

Village Chalali, P.O. Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice

dated –nil received in Labour Office, Chamba on 29.5.2012 regarding her illegal termination from

the services by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi,

District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba,

H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the

course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,

District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as

appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order

dated 6.10.2015;

And whereas Smt. Parwati W/O Shri Ramesh agitated the above orders of declining of

reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 31/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the cases

of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 in CWP No. 9467 of 2014

case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight

weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

2247

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

“Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Parwati W/O Shri Ramesh, R/O Village

Chalali, P.O. Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004 by the

Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District

Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised her industrial

dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated-nil-received on 29.5.2012,

without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified

? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what

amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-

worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Yog Raj S/O Shri Prem Lal, R/O

Village Shour, P.O. Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated

25.3.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, Killar

Division, H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-

Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,

but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent

a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,

H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,

District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as

appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of more than 6 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order

dated 8.10.2015;

And whereas Shri Yog Raj S/O Shri Prem Lal agitated the above orders of declining of

reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 31/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the cases

of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 in CWP No. 9467 of 2014

case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight

weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

2248

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Yog Raj S/O Shri Prem Lal, R/O Village

Shour, P.O. Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during October, 2005 by the

Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba,

H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after

more than 6 years vide demand notice dated 25.3.2012, without complying the provisions of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of

more than 6 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority,

past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above

employer/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Sheela W/O Shri Prem Raj, R/O

Village Kufa, P.O. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated

24.9.2012 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, Killar

Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officercum-

Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,

but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent

a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,

H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,

District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate

Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of 8

years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 5.2.2014;

And whereas Smt. Sheela W/O Shri Prem Raj agitated the above orders of declining of

reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 31/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the cases

of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 in CWP No. 9467 of 2014

case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight

weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

2249

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/

issues for legal adjudication;

“Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Sheela W/O Shri Prem Raj, R/O Village

Kufa, P.O. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004 by the

Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District

Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised her industrial

dispute after 8 years vide demand notice dated 24.9.2012, without complying the provisions

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of delay

of 8 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past

service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above

employer/ management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Sato Devi W/O Shri Dhano, R/O

Village Kuthah, P.O. Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice

dated –nil-received in Labour Office, Chamba on 15.6.2012 regarding her illegal termination from

the services by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi,

District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba,

H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the

course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,

District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate

Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of

more than 9 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 30.4.2014;

2250

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

And whereas Smt. Sato Devi W/O Shri Dhano agitated the above orders of declining of

reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 31/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the cases

of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 in CWP No. 9467 of 2014

case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight

weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

“Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Sato Devi W/O Shri Dhano, R/O Village

Kuthah, P.O. Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2002 by the

Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District

Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised her industrial

dispute after more than 9 years vide demand notice dated –nil-received on 15.06.2012,

without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified

? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 9 years in raising the industrial dispute, what

amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-

worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 16th Februay, 2016

No. 11-1/7(Lab) ID/2015-Joginder Nagar.—Whereas Smt. Parwati Devi W/O Shri

Purshotam, R/O Village Banjal (Langehar), P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. had

raised a demand notice dated 16.08.2011 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Inspector-

cum- Conciliation Officer, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute

amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where

after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour

Commissioner, H.P.;

2251

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Inspector-cum- Conciliation Officer, Joginder

Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as

appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of more than 6 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order

dated 25.8.2012;

And whereas Smt. Parwati Devi W/O Shri Purshotam agitated the above orders of declining

of reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 3504/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the civil writ petition on 24.08.2015 and directed the respondents to consider the case

of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014 case titled Pratap Chand

versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being the lead case within eight weeks.

The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petition are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending application, if any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Smt. Parwati Devi W/O Shri

Purshotam, R/O Village Banjal (Langehar), P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi,

H.P. before the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P.

vide demand notice dated 16.8.2011 regarding her alleged illegal termination of service

w.e.f. 08.07.2005 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the

services of Smt. Parwati Devi W/O Shri Purshotam, R/O Village Banjal (Langehar), P.O.

Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D.

Division, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.07.2005 without complying the

provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of

back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved

workman is entitled to from the above employer?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

In the Court of Shri Arindam Chaudhary, IAS, Marriage Officer-cum-S.D.M., Hamirpur,

Himachal Pradesh

In the matter of :

Vijay Kumar aged 30 years s/o Shri Nain Singh, r/o Village Mahal, Tehsil Bhoranj, District

Hamirpur (H.P.).

and

2252

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

Kiran aged 18 years d/o Shri Desh Raj, r/o Village Chammb, P.O. Kakkar, Tehsil

Taunidevi, District Hamirpur (H.P.)

. . Applicants.

Versus

General Public

Subject.— Notice under Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Vijay Kumar and Kiran have filed an application under Special Marriage Act, 1954

alongwith affidavit and other documents in the court of undersigned in which they stated that they

intend to solemnized marriage within three Calendar months.

Therefore, the General Public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who

has any objection for this marriage can file the objection personally or in writing before this court

on or before 01-07-2017. The objection received after 01-07-2017 will not be entertained and

marriage will be registered accordingly.

Issued today on 01-06-2017 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate,

Hamirpur (H.P.).

__________

[

In the Court of Arindam Chaudhary, IAS, Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate,

Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh

In the matter of :

Subhash Chand aged 34 years s/o Shri Kishori Lal, r/o Village & P.O. Majhog Sultani,

Tehsil & District Hamirpur.

and

Kanta Devi aged 22 years d/o Shri Dasu Ram, r/o Village & P.O. Majhog Sultani, Tehsil &

District Hamirpur

. . Applicants.

Versus

General Public

Subject.— Notice under section 15-16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Subhash Chand and Kanta Devi have filed an application under Special Marriage Act, 1954

alongwith affidavit and other documents in the court of undersigned in which they stated that they

solemnized marriage 20-03-2017.

2253

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

Therefore, the General Public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who

has any objection for this marriage can file the objection personally or in writing before this court

on or before 04-07-2017. The objection received after 04-07-2017 will not be entertained and

marriage will be registered accordingly.

Issued today on 01-06-2017 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate,

Hamirpur (H.P.).

__________

In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sundernagar,

District Mandi, H. P.

In the matter of :—

1.

Shri Parvindra s/o Sh. Desh Raj, r/o Village Khataula, P.O. Harsoli, Tehsil and District

Muzaffarnagar, U.P. presently residing at Sai Industry, Village Bhour, P.O. Kanaid,

Tehsil Sundernagar, District Mandi, H.P.

2.

Pooja d/o Shri Jasbira, r/o V.P.O. Harsoli, Tehsil and District Muzaffarnagar, U.P.

presently wife of Shri Parvindra s/o Sh. Desh Raj, r/o Sai Industry, Village Bhour, P.O.

Kanaid, Tehsil Sundernagar, District Mandi, H.P.

. . Applicants.

Versus

General Public

.. Respondent.

Subject.—Application for registration of marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act 1954.

Notice :

Shri Parvindra and Pooja applicants have filed an application alongwith affidavits in the

court of undersigned under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have solemnized

their marriage on 27-05-2017 according to Hindu rites and ceremonies and they are living together

as husband and wife since then, hence, their marriage may be registered under Special Marriage

Act, 1954.

Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who

has any objection regarding this marriage, can file the objection personally or in writing before this

court on or before 07-07-2017 after that no objection will be entertained and marriage will be

registered.

Issued today on 29-05-2017 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

RAJIV KUMAR (HPAS),

Marriage Office-cum-SDM,

Sundernagar, District Mandi (H.P.).

2254

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

In The Court of Shri Hemis Negi, H.A.S., Sub Divisional Magistrate Shimla (Urban),

District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh

Shri O. P. Oberoi s/o Late Shri Sita Ram Oberoi, r/o House No. 128, Sector 12, Panchkula

. . Applicant.

Versus

General Public

.. Respondent.

Application under section 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969.

Whereas Shri O. P. Oberoi s/o Late Shri Sita Ram Oberoi, r/o House No. 128, Sector 12,

Panchkula has preferred an application to the undersigned for registration the date of birth of his

daughter namely Upsana Oberoi (DOB 15-5-1970) in the record of Municipal Corporation, Shimla.

Therefore, this proclamation, the General Public is hereby informed that any person having

and objection for entry as to date of birth mentioned above, may submit his objection in writing in

this court on or before 6-7-2017 failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of date

and will be decided accordingly.

Given under my hand and seal of the Court on this 6th day of June, 2017.

Seal.

HEMIS NEGI,

Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Shimla (Urban).

__________

In the Court of Shri Gian Sagar Negi, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Shimla (R),

District Shimla (H. P.)

Shri Tsering Dorjee s/o Shri Damdul, r/o House No. E-106, Tibetan Colony, Panthaghatti,

Tehsil & District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.

Versus

General Public

. . Respondent.

Whereas Shri Tsering Dorjee s/o Shri Damdul, r/o House No. E-106, Tibetan Colony,

Panthaghatti, Tehsil & District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh has filed an application along with

affidavit in the court of undersigned under section 13(3) of the Birth & Death Registration Act,

1969 to enter the date of birth of his Nephew named—Shri Tenzin Passang s/o Lt. Shri Kunsang

Choephel, r/o House No. E-106, Tibetan Colony, Panthaghatti, Tehsil & District Shimla, Himachal

Pradesh in the record of Secy., Birth and Death, Municipal Corporation, Shimla.

2255

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

Sl.

No.

Name of the family member

Relation

Date of Birth

1.

Mr. Tenzin Passang

Nephew

12-04-1981

Hence, this proclamation is issued to the general public if they have any objection/claim

regarding enter the name & date of birth of above named in the record of Municipal Corporation,

Shimla may file their claims/objections on or before one month of publication of this notice in

Govt. Gazette in this court, failing which necessary orders will be passed.

Issued today 12-06-2017 under my signature and seal of the court.

Seal.

GIAN SAGAR NEGI,

Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Shimla (R), District Shimla.

__________

In the Court of Shri Gian Sagar Negi, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Shimla (R),

District Shimla (H. P.)

Shri Palden s/o Lt. Shri Sonam, r/o House No. 4, Tibetan Colony, Panthaghatti, Tehsil &

District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.

Versus

General Public

. . Respondent.

Whereas Shri Palden s/o Lt. Shri Sonam, r/o House No. 4, Tibetan Colony, Panthaghatti,

Tehsil & District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh has filed an application along with affidavit in the

court of undersigned under section 13(3) of the Birth & Death Registration Act, 1969 to enter the

date of birth of his Daughter named—Ms. Tenzin Dolma d/o Shri Palden s/o Lt. Shri Sonam, r/o

House No. 4, Tibetan Colony, Panthaghatti, Tehsil & District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh in the

record of Secy., Birth and Death, Municipal Corporation, Shimla.

Sl.

No.

Name of the family member

Relation

Date of Birth

1.

Ms. Tenzin Dolma

Daughter

01-05-1971

Hence, this proclamation is issued to the general public if they have any objection/claim

regarding enter the name & date of birth of above named in the record of Municipal Corporation,

Shimla may file their claims/objections on or before one month of publication of this notice in

Govt. Gazette in this court, failing which necessary orders will be passed.

Issued today 12-06-2017 under my signature and seal of the court.

Seal.

GIAN SAGAR NEGI,

Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Shimla (R), District Shimla.

2256

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

c vnkyr Jh ujksre yky] lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh] js.kqdkth fLFkr laxMkg]

ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0

fely ua0 % 04@2017

rkjh[k is'kh % 01&07&2017

Jh jkts'k dqekj iq= Jh eydw iq= ukt:] fuoklh jtkuk] rglhy js.kqdkth] ftyk fljekSj] fg0iz0

cuke

vke turk@lxs lEcU/kh

fo"k;-&&n[okLr cjk;s lsgrukekA

mijksDr izkFkZuk i= Jh jkts'k dqekj iq= Jh eydw iq= ukt:] fuoklh jtkuk] rglhy js.kqdkth]

ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0 us bl vk'k; ds lkFk xqtkjk gS fd mldk uke jkts'k dqekj gS tks fd f'k{kk

foHkkx] ifjokj jftLVj esa lgh ntZ gS ijUrq jktLo fjdkMZ ekStk jtkuk esa mldk uke jktsUnz flag ntZ

gS tks fd xyr ntZ gS rFkk ftldh og dkxtkr eky esa n#Lrh djokuk pkgrk gSA

vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl lEcU/k esa ;fn fdlh O;fDr

dks dksbZ mtj ;k ,rjkt gks rks og Lo;a vFkok vius izfrfuf/k }kjk fefr 01&07&2017 dks lqcg 10 cts

gekjh vnkyr esa mifLFkr gksdj mtj@,rjkt izLrqr dj ldrk gS ckn xqtjus fe;kn dksbZ mtj dkcys

xkSj u gksxk rFkk vnkyr ls uke n#Lrh ckjs vko';d vkns'k ikfjr dj fn;s tk;saxsA

vkt fnukad 30&05&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj ,oa eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh fd;k x;kA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh]

js.kqdkth fLFkr laxMkg] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A

&&&&&&&

c vnkyr Jh ujksre yky] dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh] js.kqdkth fLFkr laxMkg]

ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0

fely ua0 % 11@2017

rkjh[k is'kh % 01&07&2017

Jh osn izdk'k iq= Jh lfu;k jke] fuoklh j.kQqvk] rglhy js.kqdkth] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0

cuke

vke turk

fo"k;-&&tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k ntZ djus ckjs izkFkZuk&i=A

mijksDr izkFkZuk&i= Jh osn izdk'k iq= Jh lfu;k jke] fuoklh j.kQqvk] rglhy js.kqdkth] ftyk

fljekSj] fg0 iz0 us v/khu /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969 ds vUrxZr izLrqr djds

izkFkZuk dh gS fd mlds iq= vadq'k ftldh tUe frfFk 26&10&2011 gS tks xzke iapk;r j.kQqvk ds fjdkMZ

esa ntZ ugha djok;k x;k gSA ftls izkFkhZ vc ntZ djokuk pkgrk gSA

2257

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl lEcU/k esa ;fn fdlh O;fDr

dks dksbZ mtj ;k ,rjkt gks rks og Lo;a vFkok vius izfrfuf/k }kjk fefr 01&07&2017 dks lqcg 10 cts

gekjh vnkyr esa mifLFkr gksdj mtj@,rjkt izLrqr dj ldrk gS ckn xqtjus fe;kn dksbZ mtj

dkfcys xkSj u gksxk rFkk lk;y ds iq= vadq'k dh tUe frfFk ntZ djus ds vkns'k tkjh dj fn;s tk;saxsA

vkt fnukad 30&05&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh fd;k x;kA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]

js.kqdkth fLFkr laxMkg] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A

&&&&&&&

c vnkyr Jh ujksre yky] dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh] js.kqdkth fLFkr laxMkg]

ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0

fely ua0 % 10@2017

rkjh[k is'kh % 01&07&2017

Jherh nqjek nsoh iRuh Jh lqHkk"k pUn] fuoklh vokaBk] Mk0 lkaxuk] rglhy js.kqdkth] ftyk

fljekSj] fg0 iz0A

cuke

vke turk

fo"k;-&&tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k ntZ djus ckjs izkFkZuk&i=A

mijksDr izkFkZuk&i= Jherh nqjek nsoh iRuh Jh lqHkk"k pUn] fuoklh vokaBk] Mk0 lkaxuk] rglhy

js.kqdkth] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0 us v/khu /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969 ds vUrxZr

izLrqr djds izkFkZuk dh gS fd mldh iq=h J`f"V ftldh tUe frfFk 31&10&2013 gS tks xzke iapk;r

lkaxuk ds fjdkMZ esa ntZ ugha gSA ftls izkfFkZ;k vc ntZ djokuk pkgrh gSA

vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl lEcU/k esa ;fn fdlh O;fDr

dks dksbZ mtj ;k ,rjkt gks rks og Lo;a vFkok vius izfrfuf/k }kjk fefr 01&07&2017 dks lqcg 10 cts

gekjh vnkyr esa mifLFkr gksdj mtj@,rjkt izLrqr dj ldrk gS ckn xqtjus fe;kn dksbZ mtj

dkfcys xkSj u gksxk rFkk lk;y dh iq=h J`f"V dh tUe frfFk ntZ djus ds vkns'k tkjh dj fn;s tk;saxsA

vkt fnukad 30&05&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh fd;k x;kA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]

js.kqdkth fLFkr laxMkg] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A

2258

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

c vnkyr lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh] js.kqdkth fLFkr laxMkg]

ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0

fely ua0 % 05@2017

rkjh[k ejtqvk % 22&5&2017

rkjh[k is'kh % 01&07&2017

Jh ijekuUn iq= Jh thr flag iq= daBh jke] fuoklh jtkuk] rglhy js.kqdkth] ftyk fljekSj]

fg0 iz0

- - izkFkhZx.kA

cuke

vke turk@lxs lEcU/kh

- - izfroknhx.kA

fo"k;-&n[okLr cjk;s lsgr uke jktLo fjdkMZ ekStk <ky iykjk] rglhy jS.kqdkth] ftyk fljekSj] fg0iz0

izkFkhZ mijksDr us vnkyr gtk esa ,d nj[okLr xqtkjh fd mldk uke ijekuUn gS tks fd f'k{kk

foHkkx] iapk;r fjdkMZ ,oa vk/kkj dkMZ esa lgh ntZ gS ijUrq jktLo fjdkMZ ekStk <ky iykjk esa mldk

uke izse flag ntZ gS tks fd xyr ntZ gS rFkk ftldh og jktLo fjdkMZ esa n#Lrh djokuk pkgrk gSA

vr% bl vnkyrh b'rgkj ds ek/;e ls vke turk@lxs lEcfU/k;ksa dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd

vxj izkFkhZ mijksDr dk uke jktLo fjdkMZ ekStk <ky iykjk] iVokj o`r dkdksx esa ntZ djus ckjs fdlh

O;fDr dks dksbZ mtj ,oa ,rjkt gks rks og fnukad 01&07&2017 dks izkr% 10 cts gekjh vnkyr esa

vlkyru@odkyru gkftj vkdj mtj ,oa ,rjkt izLrqr dj ldrk gS ckn xqtjus fe;kn dksbZ

dk;Zokgh dkfcys lek;r u gksxh rFkk fu;ekuqlkj vko';d vkns'k ikfjr dj fn;s tk;saxsA

vkt fnukad 30&05&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj ,oa eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh fd;k x;kA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh]

js.kqdkth fLFkr laxMkg] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A

&&&&&&&

c vnkyr Jh ujksre yky] dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh] js.kqdkth fLFkr laxMkg]

ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0

fely ua0 % 08@2017

rkjh[k is'kh % 01&07&2017

Jh fouksn dqekj iq= ghjk flag] fuoklh fVdjh] rglhy js.kqdkth] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0

cuke

vke turk

fo"k;-&&tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k ntZ djus ckjs izkFkZuk&i=A

mijksDr izkFkZuk&i= Jh fouksn dqekj iq= ghjk flag] fuoklh fVdjh] rglhy js.kqdkth] ftyk

fljekSj] fg0 iz0 us v/khu /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969 ds vUrxZr izLrqr djds

izkFkZuk dh gS fd mlds nknk gqDeh jke iq= 'kadj ftldh e`R;q frfFk 01&01&2013 gS dk uke xzke

iapk;r laxMkg ds fjdkMZ esa ntZ ugha gSA ftls izkFkhZ vc ntZ djokuk pkgrk gSA

2259

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl lEcU/k esa fdlh O;fDr dks

dksbZ mtj ;k ,rjkt gks rks og Lo;a vFkok vius izfrfuf/k }kjk fefr 01&07&2017 dks lqcg 10 cts

gekjh vnkyr esa mifLFkr gksdj mtj@,rjkt izLrqr dj ldrk gS ckn xqtjus fe;kn dksbZ mtj

dkfcys xkSj u gksxk rFkk lk;y ds nknk gqDeh dh e`R;q frfFk ntZ djus ds vkns'k tkjh dj fn;s tk;saxsA

vkt fnukad 30&05&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh fd;k x;kA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]

js.kqdkth fLFkr laxMkg] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A

&&&&&&&&&

c vnkyr Jh ek;k jke 'kekZ] mi&iathiky f'kykbZ] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0

xqeku flag iq= Jh uSu flag] fuoklh xzke ckscjh] rglhy f'kykbZ

dqUnu flag iq= Jh uSu flag] fuoklh xzke ckscjh] rglhy f'kykbZ

cuke

vke vknehA

3- Jherh NVks nsoh iRuh Jh uSu flag] fuoklh xzke ckscjh] rglhy f'kykbZA

4- Jherh fdj.k ckyk iq=h Jh uSu flag] fuoklh xzke ckscjh] rglhy f'kykbZA

izkFkZuk&i= fd;s tkus ckjs iathd`r olh;rukek (unregistered) tsj /kkjk 40&41 ds vUrxZrA

bl b'rgkj ds }kjk vkidks voxr djk;k tkrk gS fd xqeku flag iq= Jh uSu flag] fuoklh xzke

ckscjh] rglhy f'kykbZ] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0 }kjk ,d olh;rukek bl U;k;ky; esa izLrqr dj fuosnu

fd;k gS fd muds firk Jh uSu flag }kjk vius thou dky esa ,d olh;r [kke rgjhj dh gS vc uSu

flag iq= [;kyw jke dh e`R;q gks pqdh gS vc olh;r dks xqeku flag o dqUnu flag iq= uSu flag

jftLVªs'ku ,DV dh /kkjk 40&41 ds vUrxZr iathd`r fd;k tk,A vr% bl b'rgkj }kjk vke o [kkl dks

lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd fdlh dks dksbZ vkifÙk gks rks og fnukad 04&07&2017 dks vlkyru ;k

odkyru gkftj vnkyr gksdj viuk ,rjkt is'k dj ldrk gSA gkftj u vkus dh fLFkfr esa dk;Zokgh

,drjQk vey esa ykbZ tk,xhA

vkt fnukad 27&05&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj lfgr tkjh gqvkA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

mi&iathiky]

f'kykbZ] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A

&&&&&&&&&

In the Court of Shri H. S. Rana, H.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate

Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh

NOTICE UNDER SECTION 16 OF SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT, 1954

In the matter of :

1.

Shri Tarun Kumar s/o Shri Ram Swaroop, r/o Village Bharog Baneri, Tehsil Paonta

Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P.

2260

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

2.

Smt. Neelam Kumari d/o Shri Tula Ram, r/o Village Korga, Sub-Tehsil Kamrau,

District Sirmaur, H.P.

Versus

General Public

Application for the registration of Marriage under Section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954

(Central Act) as amended by Marriage Laws (Amendment Act 01, 49 of 2001).

Shri Tarun Kumar s/o Shri Ram Swaroop, r/o Village Bharog Baneri, Tehsil Paonta Sahib,

District Sirmaur, H.P. and Smt. Neelam Kumari d/o Shri Tula Ram, r/o Village Korga, Sub-

Tehsil Kamrau, District Sirmaur, H.P have filed an application alongwith affidavits in this court

under section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 on dated 01-06-2017 stating therein that they have

been solemnized their marriage on 07-05-2017 at their residence Paonta Sahib and they have living

together as husband and wife ever since then. Hence notices are given to all concerend and general

public to this effect that if any body have any objection regarding the registration of marriage duly

solemnized on 7-5-2017 between Shri Tarun Kumar s/o Shri Ram Swaroop, r/o Village Bharog

Baneri, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P. and Smt. Neelam Kumari d/o Shri Tula Ram,

r/o Village Korga, Sub-Tehsil Kamrau, District Sirmaur, H.P. he should file written objections and

appear personally or through an authorized agent before this court within 30 days from the date of

issue of this notice. After expiry of the said period, the marriage certificate would be issued to the

applicants by this court.

Issued under my hand and office seal of this court on 01-06-2017.

Seal.

HARI SINGH RANA (HAS),

Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur.

__________

In the Court of Shri H. S. Rana, H.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate

Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh

NOTICE UNDER SECTION 16 OF SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT, 1954

In the matter of :

1.

Shri Rohit s/o Shri Vidya Dutt Bhardwaj, r/o ward No. 11, House No. 94/1 badri

Nagar, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P.

2.

Smt. Ekta d/o Shri Umesh Sharma, r/o Village Seithba, District Kanpur, UP.

Versus

General Public

2261

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

Application for the registration of Marriage under Section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954

(Central Act) as amended by Marriage Laws (Amendment Act 01, 49 of 2001).

Shri Rohit s/o Shri Vidya Dutt Bhardwaj, r/o ward No. 11, House No. 94/1 badri Nagar,

Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P. and Smt. Ekta d/o Shri Umesh Sharma, r/o Village Seithba,

District Kanpur, UP have filed an application alongwith affidavits in this court under section 16 of

Special Marriage Act, 1954 on dated 31-05-2017 stating therein that they have been solemnized

their marriage on 12-12-2016 at their residence Paonta Sahib and they have living together as

husband and wife ever since then. Hence notices are given to all concerend and general public to

this effect that if any body have any objection regarding the registration of marriage duly

solemnized on 12-12-2016 between Shri Rohit s/o Shri Vidya Dutt Bhardwaj, r/o ward No. 11,

House No. 94/1 badri Nagar, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P. and Smt. Ekta d/o Shri Umesh

Sharma, r/o Village Seithba, District Kanpur, UP he should file written objections and appear

personally or through an authorized agent before this court within 30 days from the date of issue of

this notice. After expiry of the said period, the marriage certificate would be issued to the

applicants by this court.

Issued under my hand and office seal of this court on 01-06-2017.

Seal.

HARI SINGH RANA (HAS),

Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur.

__________

c vnkyr Jh Mh0 vkj0 HkkfV;k] rglhynkj ,oa dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh] ukykx<+]

ftyk lksyu] fg0 iz0

eq0 ua0 % 8@2017

Jherh fueZyk nsoh

cuke

vke turk

izkFkZuk&i= tsjs /kjk 13¼3½ fg0 iz0 iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969-

uksfVl cuke vke turkA

Jherh fueZyk nsoh iq=h Jh izhre flag] fuoklh iYyh ¼xqjnkliqjk½ rglhy ukykx<+] ftyk lksyu

us bl vnkyr esa 'kiFk&i= lfgr eqdíek nk;j fd;k gS fd mldh ekrk I;kjh nsoh dh e`R;q fnukad

8&1&1972 dks gqbZ gS ijUrq xzke iapk;r cxySgM esa e`R;q iathd`r u gSA vr% bls iathd`r fd;s tkus ds

vkns'k fn;s tk;sa A

2262

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 twu] 2017@29 T;s"B] 1939

vr% bl uksfVl ds }kjk leLr turk dks rFkk lEcfU/kr lEcfU/k;ksa dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd

;fn fdlh dks mijksDr I;kjh nsoh dh e`R;q frfFk iathdj.k fd;s tkus ckjs dksbZ ,rjkt gks rks og viuk

,rjkt gekjh vnkyr esa fnukad 15&7&2017 dks vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj vkdj is'k dj ldrk gSA

vU;Fkk e`rkfcd 'kiFk&i= e`R;q frfFk iathd`r fd;s tkus ckjs vkns'k ikfjr dj fn;s tk;saxsA

vkt fnukad 15&6&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh fd;k x;kA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

rglhynkj ,oa dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]

ukykx<+] ftyk lksyu ¼fg0 iz0½A

fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr

bysDVªkWfud gLrk{kfjr jkti=] oSclkbV http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in ij miyC/k gS ,oe~ vkWuykbu lR;kfir fd;k tk ldrk gS