jkti=] fgekpy izns'k
fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr
eaxyokj] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
fgekpy izns'k ljdkj
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA - 171 001
CHARGE RELINQUISHMENT REPORT
Dated 12th June, 2017
No. HHC/GAZ/14-217/95-1.—I, Rakesh Chaudhary, herebyrelinquish the charge of the
post of Registrar (Administraion), High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, today the 3rd day of
June, 2017, in the evening to avail 05 days’ earned leave w.e.f. 05.06.2017 to 09.06.2017 with
57&jkti=@2017&20&06&2017
¼2263½
2264
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
permission to prefix Sunday falling on 04.06.2017 and to suffix Second Saturday and Sunday
falling on 10.06.2017 and 11.6.2017.
By order,
(RAKESH CHAUDHARY)
Registrar (Administration).
________
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA - 171 001
CHARGE ASSUMPTION REPORT
Dated 12th June, 2017
No.HHC/GAZ/14-217/95-1.—I, Rakesh Chaudhary, assume the charge of the post of
Registrar (Administraion), High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, today the 12th day of June,
2017, in the forenoon after availing 05 days’ earned leave w.e.f 05.06.2017 to 09.06.2017 with
permission to prefix Sunday falling on 04.06.2017 and to suffix Second Saturday and Sunday
falling on 10.06.2017 and 11.6.2017.
By order,
(RAKESH CHAUDHARY)
Registrar (Administration).
________
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA – 171 001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 13th June, 2017
No.HHC/GAZ/14-237/1999.—Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant
ex post facto sanction of 03 days commuted leave w.e.f 22.05.2017 to 24.05.2017 in favour of
Sh. Rajeev Bali, Additional District and Sessions Judge-1, Kangra at Dharamshala, HP.
Certified that Sh. Rajeev Bali had joined the same post and at the same station from where
he proceeded on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.
Also certified that Sh. Rajeev Bali would have continued to hold the post of Additional
District and Sessions Judge-1, Kangra at Dharamshala, HP but for his proceeding on leave for the
above period.
By order,
Sd/-
Registrar General.
2265
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA - 171 001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 13th June, 2017
No. HHC/GAZ/ 14-347/2014.—Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant
expost facto sanction of 05 days commuted leave w.e.f 02.05.2017 to 06.05.2017 with permission
to suffix Sunday fell on 07.05.2017 in favour of Ms. Akanksha Dogra, Civil Judge-cum-JMIC-1,
Dharamshala, H.P.
Certified that Ms. Akanksha Dogra has joined the same post and at the same station from
where she proceeded on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.
Also certified that Ms. Akanksha Dogra would have continued to hold the post of civil
Judge-cum-JMIC-1, Dharmshala, H.P., but for her proceeding on leave for the above period.
By order,
Sd/-
Registrar General.
_________
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA - 171 001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 13th June, 2017
No. HHC/GAZ/14-349/2014.—Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant
ex post facto sanction of 01 day commuted leave for 06.05.2017 with permission to suffix Sunday
fell on 07.05.2017 in favour of Sh. Vikas Bhardwaj, Additional District and Sessions Judge,
Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, H.P.
Certified that Sh. Vikas Bhardwaj had joined the same post and at the same station from
where he proceeded on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.
Also certified that Sh. Vikas Bhardwaj would have continued to hold the post of Additional
District and Sessions Judge, Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, HP but for his proceeding on leave for
the above period.
By order,
Sd/-
Registrar General.
_________
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA - 171 001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 14th June, 2017
No. HHC/GAZ/14-233/97-1.— Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant
10 days earned leave w.e.f 19.06.2017 to 28.06.2017 with permission to prefix Sunday falling on
18.06.2017 in favour of Shri Pune Ram, Additional District & Sessions Judge-I, Mandi, H.P.
2266
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
Certified that Shri Pune Ram is likely to join the the same post and at the same station from
where he proceeds on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.
Also certified that Shri Pune Ram would have continued to hold the post of Additional
District and Sessions Judge-I, Mandi but for his proceeding on leave for the above period.
By order,
Sd/-
Registrar General.
_________
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA - 171 001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 9th June, 2017
No.HHC/GAZ/14-152/83-1.—Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant
6 days earned leave w.e.f. 19.06.2017 to 24.06.2017 with permission to prefix Sunday falling on
18.06.2017 and to suffix Sunday, Gazetted and Local holidays falling w.e.f 25.06.2017 to
27.06.2017 in favour of Shri S.C. Kainthla, District & Sessions Judge, Solan, HP.
Certified that Shri S.C. Kainthla is likely to join the same post and at the same station from
where he proceeds on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.
Also certified that Shri S.C. Kainthla would have continued to hold the post of District &
Sessions Judge, Solan but for his proceeding on leave for the above period.
By order,
Sd/-
Registrar General.
_________
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA - 171 001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 9th June, 2017
No.HHC/GAZ/14-265/2003-1.—Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to
grant 6 days earned leave w.e.f. 12.06.2017 to 17.06.2017 with permission to prefix Second
Saturday and Sunday falling on 10.06.2017 and 11.06.2017 and to suffix Sunday falling on
18.06.2017 in favour of Dr. Abira Basu, Senior Civil Judge-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sirmaur
District at Nahan, H.P.
Certified that Dr. Abira Basu is likely to join the same post and at the same station from
where he proceeds on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.
2267
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
Also certified that Dr. Abira Basu would have continued to hold the post of Senior Civil
Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sirmaur District at Nahan, H.P., but for her proceeding on
leave for the above period.
By order,
Sd/-
Registrar General.
_________
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA - 171 001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 9th June, 2017
No.HHC/GAZ/14-329/2013.—Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant
6 days earned leave w.e.f. 19.06.2017 to 24.06.2017 with permission to prefix Sunday falling on
18.06.2017 and to suffix Sunday and Gazetted holiday falling on 25.06.2017 and 26.06.2017 in
favour of Shri Gaurav Kumar, Civil Judge cum-JMIC, Chopal, District Shimla, H.P.
Certified that Shri Gaurav Kumar is likely to join the same post and at the same station from
where he proceeds on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.
Also certified that Shri Gaurav Kumar would have continued to hold the post of Civil
Judge-cum-JMIC, Chopal, District Shimla, H.P., but for hir proceeding on leave for the above
period.
By order,
Sd/-
Registrar General.
_________
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA - 171 001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 14th June, 2017
No.HHC/Admn.6 (23)/74-XVI.—Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice in exercise of the
powers vested in him under Rule 2(32) of Chapter 1 of H.P. Financial Rules, 2009, has been
pleased to declare the Additional District & Sessions Judge-II, Mandi as Drawing and Disbursing
Officer in respect of the Court of Additional District and Sessions Judge-I, Mandi and also the
Controlling Officer for the purpose of T.A etc. in respect of class-II, III and IV establishment
attached to the aforesaid court under head “2014-Administration of Justice” during the earned leave
period of Sh. Pune Ram, Additional District and Sessions Judge-I, Mandi, HP w.e.f 19.06.2017 to
28.06.2017 with permission to prefix Sunday falling on 18.06.2017 or till he returns from earned
leave.
By order,
Sd/-
Registrar General.
2268
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 16th February, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Prabh Dayal S/O Shri Surjan, R/O
Village Bairagarh, P.O. Bairagarh, Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated 10.8.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive
Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour
Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial
dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings,
where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour
Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 6 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 17.6.2013;
And whereas Shri Prabh Dayal S/O Shri Surjan agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 3704/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 10.9.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to
make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part
of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned order in the writ
petition and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ
petition is disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, alongwith all pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Prabh Dayal S/O Shri Surjan, R/O
Village Bairagarh, P.O. Bairagarh, Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, H.P. before the
Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba,
H.P. vide demand notice dated 10.8.2011 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service
during October, 2004 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the
services of Shri Prabh Dayal S/O Shri Surjan, R/O Village Bairagarh, P.O. Bairagarh,
Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division,
H.P.P.W.D., Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during October, 2004 without
complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not,
2269
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above
aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
CORRIGENDUM
Shimla-171001, March, 2016
No.11-23/84(Lab)I.D./2013/Mandi.—In partial modification of this Department’s
Notification of even number dated 17.01.2015, the date of termination of services of workman Shri
Pratap Chand S/O Shri Bhadru Ram, R/O Village Phakrohal, P.O. Seoh, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District
Mandi, H.P. may be read as “08.07.2005” instead of “09.07.2005”.
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 29th February, 2016
No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2015/Baddi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
exists between Shri Pritam Singh S/O Shri Pohu Singh, R/O Village and Post Office Jindwari,
Tehsil Nangal, District Ropar, (Punjab) and the General Manager, M/s Indo Farm Equipment Ltd.,
EPIP Phase-II, Village Thana Baddi, District Solan, H.P. on the issue of transfer /termination from
services during February /March, 2014.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Shimla, constituted under
Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—
2270
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
“Whether the termination of the services of Shri Pritam Singh S/O Shri Pohu Singh, R/O
Village and Post Office Jindwari, Tehsil Nangal, District Ropar, (Punjab) by the General
Manager, M/s Indo Farm Equipment Ltd., EPIP Phase-II, Village Thana Baddi, District
Solan, H.P. during the months February/March, 2014 without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and amount of compensation the above
aggrieved worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 29th February, 2016
No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2015/Baddi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
exists between Shri Rajiv Kumar, resident of C/O Nirmal Singh Village Bangla Beli, P.O. Kharoni,
Tehsil Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P. (Present address) and Set No.-15, Qrs.No.-6/A, Post
Chittranjan, District Burdwan (West Bengal)-713331 and the Managing Director, M/s Super
Multicolor Prints Pvt. Limited, (Folding Carton), Village Kishanpura, Baddi, Nalagarh Road,
District Solan, H.P. on the issue of termination from services w.e.f. 1.8.2014.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Shimla, constituted under
Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication :—
“Whether the termination of the services of Shri Rajiv Kumar, resident of C/O Nirmal
Singh Village Bangla Beli, P.O. Kharoni, Tehsil Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P. (Present
address) and Set No.-15, Qrs.No.-6/A, Post Chittranjan, District Burdwan (West Bengal)-
713331, who was employed as senior operator and drawing salary Rs. 40,000/-per month by
the Managing Director, M/s Super Multicolor Prints Pvt. Limited, (Folding Carton), Village
Kishanpura, Baddi, Nalagarh Road, District Solan, H.P. w.e.f. 1.8.2014 without complying
with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what
amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and amount of compensation the
above aggrieved worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
2271
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
CORRIGENDUM
Shimla-171001, March, 2016
No.11-23/84(Lab)I.D./2013/Mandi.—In partial modification of this Department’s
Notification of even number dated 17.01.2015, the date of termination of services of workman Shri
Ramesh Chand S/O Shri Ram Ditta, R/O Village Sandehra, P.O. Tihra, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District
Mandi, H.P. may be read as “08.07.2005” instead of “09.07.2005”.
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 21st January, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Ramesh Kumar S/O Shri Dhanu
Ram, R/O Village and Post Office Golli, Tehsil Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a
demand notice dated 10.9.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive
Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,
but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent
a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,
H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 16 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 31.10.2013;
And whereas Shri Ramesh Kumar S/O Shri Dhanu Ram agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4250/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 26.10.2015 and directed the respondents to
consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014 case titled
Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being the lead case
within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petition are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending application, if any.”
2272
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Ramesh Kumar S/O Shri Dhanu
Ram, R/O Village and Post Office Golli, Tehsil Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. before the
Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. vide demand
notice dated 10.9.2012 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during July, 1996
suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Ramesh
Kumar S/O Shri Dhanu Ram, R/O Village and Post Office Golli, Tehsil Dalhousie, District
Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba,
H.P. during July, 1996 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above
employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 21st January, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Tilak Raj S/O Shri Ronki Ram, R/O
Village Kharnalla, P.O. Tritha, Tehsil Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated 22.3.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,
I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer,
Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could
not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under
Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of 10 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated
14.11.2014;
And whereas Shri Tilak Raj S/O Shri Ronki Ram agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4250/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 26.10.2015 and directed the respondents to consider the case
of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014 case titled Pratap Chand
versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being the lead case within eight weeks.
The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
2273
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petition are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending application, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Tilak Raj S/O Shri Ronki Ram,
R/O Village Kharnalla, P.O. Tritha, Tehsil Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. before the
Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. vide demand
notice dated 22.3.2012 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during
November, 2000 vide notice dated 21.10.2000 suffers from delay and latches? If not,
Whether termination of the services of Shri Tilak Raj S/O Shri Ronki Ram, R/O Village
Kharnalla, P.O. Tritha, Tehsil Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. during November, 2000 vide notice
dated 21.10.2000, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the
above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 21st January, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Mohinder Singh S/O Shri Diwan
Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Tritha, Tehsil Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a
demand notice dated 2.2.2013 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive
Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,
but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent
a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,
H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 15 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 13.11.2013;
2274
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
And whereas Shri Mohinder Singh S/O Shri Diwan Chand agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4250/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 26.10.2015 and directed the respondents to
consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014 case titled
Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being the lead case
within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petition are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending application, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Mohinder Singh S/O Shri Diwan
Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Tritha, Tehsil Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. before
the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. vide demand
notice dated 2.2.2013 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during April, 1997
suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Mohinder
Singh S/O Shri Diwan Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Tritha, Tehsil Dalhousie,
District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District
Chamba, H.P. during April, 1997 without complying the provisions of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the
above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 21st January, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Kewal Krishan S/O late Shri Chatter
Singh, R/O Village Jasoor, P.O. Samote, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a
demand notice dated 15.10.2010 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the
Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum
Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,
but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent
a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,
H.P.;
2275
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
about 10 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 16.2.2013;
And whereas Shri Kewal Krishan S/O late Shri Chatter Singh agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4250/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 26.10.2015 and directed the respondents to
consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014 case titled
Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being the lead case
within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petition are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending application, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Kewal Krishan S/O late Shri
Chatter Singh, R/O Village Jasoor, P.O. Samote, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P.
before the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. vide
demand notice dated 15.10.2010 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during
November, 2000 vide notice dated 6.10.2000 suffers from delay and latches? If not,
Whether termination of the services of Shri Kewal Krishan S/O late Shri Chatter Singh, R/O
Village Jasoor, P.O. Samote, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive
Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. during November, 2000 vide
notice dated 6.10.2000, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority,
past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the
above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 21st January, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Kishan Pal S/O late Shri Sagar Singh,
R/O Village and Post Office Jatroon, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated 15.11.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive
2276
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,
but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent
a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,
H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 11 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order
dated 21.5.2015;
And whereas Shri Kishan Pal S/O late Shri Sagar Singh agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4250/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 26.10.2015 and directed the respondents to
consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014 case titled
Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being the lead case
within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petition are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending application, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Kishan Pal S/O late Shri Sagar
Singh, R/O Village and Post Office Jatroon, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. before
the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. vide demand
notice dated 15.11.2011 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during August,
2000 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri
Kishan Pal S/O late Shri Sagar Singh, R/O Village and Post Office Jatroon, Tehsil Bhatiyat,
District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District
Chamba, H.P. during August, 2000 without complying the provisions of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the
above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
2277
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 21st January, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Karmo alias Karam Chand S/O late
Shri Hari Chand, R/O Village Dangari, P.O. Taragarh, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. had
raised a demand notice dated 18.5.2010 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the
Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer cum-
Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,
but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent
a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,
H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 9 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 16.2.2013;
And whereas Shri Karmo alias Karam Chand S/O late Shri Hari Chand agitated the above
orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble
High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4250/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 26.10.2015 and directed the
respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December,
2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being
the lead case within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petition are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending application, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Karmo alias Karam Chand S/O
late Shri Hari Chand, R/O Village Dangari, P.O. Taragarh, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District
Chamba, H.P. before the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District
Chamba, H.P. vide demand notice dated 18.5.2010 regarding his alleged illegal termination
of service during August, 2000 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination
of the services of Shri Karmo alias Karam Chand S/O late Shri Hari Chand, R/O Village
Dangari, P.O. Taragarh, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,
I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. during August, 2000 without
complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not,
2278
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above
aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, March, 2016
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Sanjay Kumar S/O Shri Achharu Ram,
R/O Village Hukkal, P.O. Longani, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated 19.2.2010 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but
the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a
report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi,
District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of 6
years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 19.3.2013;
And whereas Shri Sanjay Kumar S/O Shri Achharu Ram agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 35/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 7.1.2016 and directed the respondents to consider
the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014, CWP No. 9467 of
2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within
eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
2279
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Sanjay Kumar S/O Shri Achharu Ram,
R/O Village Hukkal, P.O. Longani, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f.
09.02.2004 by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, District Mandi,
H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after 6
years vide demand notice dated 19.02.2010, without complying the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of 6
years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
“CORRIGENDUM”
Shimla-171001, 12th February, 2016
No.11-23/84(Lab)I.D./2015-Mandi.—Whereas, an alleged industrial dispute exists in
between Shri Sanjeev Kumar S/O Shri Balam Ram, R/O Village Morla, P.O. Brang, Tehsil
Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. versus The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur,
District Kangra, H.P. Whereas, a reference has been made to the Ld. Labour Court Dharamshala,
District Kangra, H.P. vide Notification of even number dated 23.10.2015 for its legal adjudication
in compliance of order dated 28.09.2015 passed by the Hon‟ble Division Bench, High Court of
H.P. in CWP No. 3932/2015-titled as Sanjeev Kumar vs. State of H.P. However, inadvertently the
correct facts could not be mentioned in para-3 of the said Notification. Therefore, the same may be
read as follows;
“And whereas Shri Sanjeev Kumar S/O Shri Balam Ram, agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon‟ble
High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4158/2015. The Hon‟ble Division
Bench, High Court of H.P. has disposed of the civil writ petition on 15.10.2015 and directed
the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in terms of the judgment dated 30th
December, 2014, delivered by this Court in a batch of writ petitions, CWP No. 9467 of
2014-titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being
the lead case. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
2280
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 21st March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Sebo Kumari W/O Shri Jagdish
Kumar, R/O Village Findru, P.O. Sach, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated 23.01.2012 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the Executive
Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The
Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the
industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation
proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947 to the Labour Commissioner H.P..;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 9 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order
dated 14.11.2014;
And whereas Smt. Sebo Kumari W/O Shri Jagdish Kumar agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 63/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to
consider the cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014
delivered by Hon’ble High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus
Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the
judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions is disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Sebo Kumari W/O Shri Jagdish Kumar,
R/O Village Findru, P.O. Sach, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during October, 2002
by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District
Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised her industrial
dispute after more than 9 years vide demand notice dated 23.01.2012, without complying
the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in
view of working period during May, 1995 to October, 2002 and delay of more than 9 years
2281
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits
and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/
management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 21st March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Thakur Singh S/O Shri Thanu Ram,
R/O Village Chhow, P.O. Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated 08.05.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,
Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-
cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute
amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where
after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour
Commissioner H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 7.2.2014;
And whereas Shri Thakur Singh S/O Shri Thanu Ram agitated the above orders of declining
of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 63/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the cases
of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 delivered by Hon’ble High
Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State
Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced
as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions is disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
2282
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Thakur Singh S/O Shri Thanu Ram, R/O
Village Chhow, P.O. Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004
by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District
Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial
dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 08.05.2012, without complying
the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in
view of working period during April, 1996 to September, 2004 and delay of more than 7
years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits and compensation the above ex-worker?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 4 March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Sevi Devi W/O Shri Bhagwan
Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a
demand notice dated 12.6.2012 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the Executive
Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H. /H.P.P.W.D., Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The
Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the
industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation
proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 10 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 28.02.2014;
And whereas Smt. Sevi Devi W/O Shri Bhagwan Chand agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 113/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 8.1.2016 and directed the Labour Commissioner,
H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The
operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned order, dated
28.2.2014 (Annexure P-1) and direct the Labour Commissioner to make reference to the
Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly.
2283
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
4. The writ petition is disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, alongwith all pending
applications.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Smt. Sevi Devi W/O Shri Bhagwan
Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. before the
Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba,
H.P. vide demand notice dated 12.6.2012 regarding her alleged illegal termination of
service during October, 2001 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of
the services of Smt. Sevi Devi W/O Shri Bhagwan Chand, R/O Village and Post Office
Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D.
Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during October, 2001 without
complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not,
what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above
aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Yash Pal S/O Shri Duni Chand, R/O
Village Millah, P.O. Singi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated
30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from back date by the
Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer cum-
Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,
but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent
a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,
H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he
should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute
vide order dated 19.09.2015;
And whereas Shri Yash Pal S/O Shri Duni Chand, agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
2284
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to
make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part
of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ
petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ
petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
1
“Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Yash Pal S/O Shri Duni
Chand, R/O Village Millah, P.O. Singi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during the
year 1998 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised
his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014,
without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and
justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7 years in
raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
2
“Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand
notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Yash Pal S/O Shri Duni Chand,
R/O Village Millah, P.O. Singi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be fulfilled by
Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. from the date
his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is legal and
justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service benefits the
above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Darshna Devi D/O Shri Sohan Lal,
R/O Village Mohalla Mugla, P.O. Hardaspura, Chamba Town, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P.
had raised a demand notice dated 15.06.2014 regarding her time to time termination / regularization
of services from back date by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba,
H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle
the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation
2285
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and she
should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute
vide order dated 21.09.2015;
And whereas Smt. Darshna Devi D/O Shri Sohan Lal, agitated the above orders of declining
of reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to
make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part
of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ
petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ
petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
1
“Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Smt. Darshna Devi D/O Shri
Sohan Lal, R/O Village Mohalla Mugla, P.O. Hardaspura, Chamba Town, Tehsil and
District Chamba, H.P. during the year 1996 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer,
I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily
wages basis and has raised her industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand
notice dated 15.06.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947, is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay
of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management?”
2
“Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand
notice dated 15.06.2014 after more than 7 years of Smt. Darshna Devi D/O Shri Sohan
Lal, R/O Village Mohalla Mugla, P.O. Hardaspura, Chamba Town, Tehsil and District
Chamba, H.P. to be fulfilled by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. from the date his junior workmen have been regularized, as
alleged by the worker, is legal and justified? If not, what arrear of wages and
consequential relief of service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner
Himachal Pradesh.
2286
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
lkekU; iz'kklu foHkkx
vuqHkkx&[k
vf/klwpuk
f'keyk&2] 2 tqykbZ] 2016
la[;k% th,Mh&ch&¼,½1&10@2013&1¼Åuk½-&&fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky dh ;g jk; gS fd ,slk
djuk vko';d gS fd fuEufyf[kr LrEHk la[;k 6 esa n'kkZ, x, iVokj o`Ùkksa ls xfBr] ftyk Åuk esa ,d
ubZ mi&rglhy fcg: dyka l`ftr dh tk,] rkfd utnhd ds xkaoksa ds lEc) yksxksa dks csgrj lsok,a
miyC/k djokbZ tk ldsa vkSj ftlls mudks gksus okyh vlqfo/kk ls fuokfjr fd;k tk lds rFkk csgrj
iz'kklfud fu;U=.k gks ldsA
vr% fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky] fgekpy izns'k Hkw&jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1954 ¼1954 dk vf/kfu;e
la[;kad 6½ dh /kkjk 6 vkSj jftLVªhdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1908 ¼1908 dk vf/kfu;e la[;kad 16½ dh /kkjk 5
}kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ftyk Åuk] fgekpy izns'k esa rqjUr izHkko ls ,d ubZ
mi&rglhy fcg: dyka] ftldk eq[;ky; eUnyh esa gksxk] dk l`tu djrs gSa%&&
mi&rglhy
dk uke
mi&e.My
dk uke
rglhy dk
uke
ftyk
eq[;ky;
lfEefyr iVokj
o`Ùk
rglhy dk uke
ftlls
vioftZr fd,
x,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
fcg: dyka
caxk.kk
caxk.kk
Åuk
eUnyh
1- Fkkukdyka
caxk.kk
2- Nijksg dyka
3- cq<okj
4- Vhgjk
5- eUnyh
6- edjSM
7- jk;iqj
8- cksg:
vkns'k }kjk]
oh0 lh0 Qkjdk]
Ekq[; lfpoA
2287
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
[Authoritative English text of the Himachal Pradesh Government Notification NO. GAD-B- (A)-1
10/2013 (Una) Dated 2-7-2016 as required under clause(3) of Article 348 of the Constitution of
India.]
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
Section-B.
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 2nd July, 2016
No. GAD-B-(A)-1-10/2013-1(Una).—Whereas, the Governor of Himachal Pradesh is of
the opinion that it is necessary to do so that a new Sub-Tehsil Bihru Kalan in District Una may be
created consisting of the Patwar Circles shown in column 6, below to provide better services to the
concerned people of nearby villages and to avoid inconvenience faced by them and to have the
better administrative control.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 6 of the Himachal Pradesh
Land Revenue Act, 1954 (Act No.6 of 1954) and section 5 of the Registration Act, 1908 (Act No.
16 of 1908), the Governor of Himachal Pradesh is pleased to create a new Sub-Tehsil at Bihru
Kalan with its headquarter at Mandli in District Una, Himachal Pradesh with immediate effect:—
Name of
the
Sub-
Tehsil
Name of
Sub-
Division
Name of
Tehsil
District
Head-
quarter
Patwar Circles
Included
Name of
Tehsil from
where
excluded
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Bihru
Kalan
Bangana
Bangana Una
Mandli
1. Thana Kalan
Bangana
2. Chhaproh
Kalan
3. Budwar
4. Tihra
5. Mandli
6. Makred
7. Raipur
8. Bohru
By order,
V. C. PHARKA,
Chief Secretary.
2288
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
lkekU; iz'kklu foHkkx
vuqHkkx&[k
vf/klwpuk
f'keyk&2] 2 tqykbZ] 2016
la[;k% th,Mh&ch&¼,½ 1&2@2013&1 ¼f'keyk½-&&fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky dh ;g jk; gS fd
,slk djuk vko';d gS fd fuEufyf[kr LrEHk la[;k 6 esa n'kkZ, x, iVokj o`Ùkksa ls xfBr] ftyk f'keyk
esa ,d ubZ mi&rglhy tyksx l`ftr dh tk,] rkfd utnhd ds xkaoksa ds lEc) yksxksa dks csgrj lsok,a
miyC/k djokbZ tk ldsa vkSj ftlls mudks gksus okyh vlqfo/kk ls fuokfjr fd;k tk lds rFkk csgrj
iz'kklfud fu;U=.k gks ldsA
vr% fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky] fgekpy izns'k Hkw&jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1954 ¼1954 dk vf/kfu;e
la[;kad 6½ dh /kkjk 6 vkSj jftLVªhdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1908 ¼1908 dk vf/kfu;e la[;kad 16½ dh /kkjk 5
}kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ftyk f'keyk fgekpy izns'k esa rqjUr izHkko ls ,d ubZ
mi&rglhy tyksx dk l`tu djrs gSa%&
mi&rglhy
dk uke
mi&e.My
dk uke
rglhy dk
uke
ftyk
eq[;ky;
lfEefyr iVokj
o`Ùk
rglhy dk uke
ftlls
vioftZr fd,
x,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Tkyksx
f'keyk
xzkeh.k
lqUuh
f'keyk
tyksx
1- /kjksxM+k
lqUuh
2- lSUt
3- cuwuk
4- vksxyh
5- dj;kyh
vkns'k }kjk]
oh0 lh0 Qkjdk]
Ekq[; lfpoA
&&&&&&&&&
[Authoritative English text of the Himachal Pradesh Government Notification NO. GADB-( A)-1
2/2013-1 (Shimla) Dated 2-7-2016 as required under clause(3) of Article 348 of the Constitution of
India.]
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
Section-B.
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 2nd July, 2016
No. GAD-B-(A)-1-2/2013-1(Shimla).—Whereas, the Governor of Himachal Pradesh is of
the opinion that it is necessary to do so that a new Sub-Tehsil Jalog in District Shimla may be
2289
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
created consisting of the Patwar Circles shown in column 6, below to provide better services to the
concerned people of nearby villages and to avoid inconvenience faced by them and to have the
better administrative control.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 6 of the Himachal Pradesh
Land Revenue Act, 1954 (Act No.6 of 1954) and section 5 of the Registration Act, 1908 (Act No.
16 of 1908), the Governor of Himachal Pradesh is pleased to create a new Sub-Tehsil at Jalog in
District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh with immediate effect:—
Name of
the Sub-
Tehsil
Name of
Sub-
Division
Name of
Tehsil
District
Head-
quarter
Patwar Circles
Included
Name of
Tehsil from
where
excluded
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Jalog
Shimla
Rural
Sunni
Shimla
Jalog
1. Dharogra
Sunni
2. Sainj
3. Banuna
4. Ogli
5. Karyali
By order,
V. C. PHARKA,
Chief Secretary.
___________
lkekU; iz'kklu foHkkx
[k&vuqHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f'keyk&2] 2 tqykbZ] 2016
la[;k% th,Mh&ch&¼,½ 1&15@2013&1 ¼PkEck½-&&fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky dh ;g jk; gS fd
orZeku mi&rglhy flgqUrk] ftyk pEck] fgekpy izns'k dk ntkZ c<+kdj rglhy dk dj fn;k tk,]
ftldk eq[;ky; flgqUrk] ftyk pEck] fgekpy izns'k esa gksxk] rkfd utnhd ds xkaoksa ds lEc) yksxksa dks
csgrj lsok,a miyC/k djokbZ tk ldsa vkSj jktLo ls lEcfU/kr dk;Z esa mudks gksus okyh vlqfo/kk ls
fuokfjr fd;k tk lds rFkk csgrj iz'kklfud fu;U=.k gks ldsA
vr% fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky] fgekpy izns'k Hkw&jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1954 ¼1954 dk vf/kfu;e
la[;kad 6½ dh /kkjk 6 vkSj jftLVªhdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1908 ¼1908 dk vf/kfu;e la[;kad 16½ dh /kkjk 5
}kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ftyk pEck] fgekpy izns'k esa rqjUr izHkko ls fuEufyf[kr iVokj
o`Ÿkksa ls lekfo"V mi&rglhy flgqUrk dk ntkZ c<+kdj rglhy dk djrs gSa %&
2290
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
rglhy
mi&e.My
ftyk
eq[;ky;
lfEefyr iVokj o`Ùk
flgqUrk
HkfV;kr
pEck
flgqUrk
1- okyw
2- flgqUrk
3- eksryk
4- /kqykjk
5- uyksg
6- xksyk
7- gVyh
8- QykgM
9- dFksV
10- eugwrk
11- fVdjh
12- leksV
13- VqUMh
14- eksjBw
15- MqIij
vkns'k }kjk]
oh0 lh0 Qkjdk]
Ekq[; lfpoA
&&&&&&&&&
[Authoritative English text of the Himachal Pradesh Government Notification NO. GADB-(A)-1
15/2013-1 (Chamba) Dated 2-7-2016 as required under clause(3) of Article 348 of the Constitution
of India.]
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
B-Section.
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 2nd July, 2016
No. GAD-B-(A)-1-15/2013-1 (Chamba).—Whereas, the Governor of Himachal Pradesh is
of the opinion that present Sub-Tehsil Sihunta District Chamba H.P. may be upgraded to that of
Tehsil with its Headquarter at Sihunta, District Chamba H.P., to provide better services to the
concerned people of nearby villages and to avoid inconvenience faced by them pertaining to
revenue work and to have better administrative control.
2291
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 6 of the Himachal Pradesh
Land Revenue Act, 1954 (Act No. 6 of 1954) and section 5 of the Registration Act, 1908 (Act No.
16 of 1908) the Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to upgrade the Sub-Tehsil Sihunta in
District Chamba, Himachal Pradesh to that of Tehsil consisting of Patwar Circles given below with
immediate effect:—
Tehsil
Sub-Division
District
Headquarter
Patwar Circles Included
Sihunta
Bhatiat
Chamba
Sihunta
1. Balu
2. Sihunta
3. Motla
4. Dhulara
5. Naloh
6. Gola
7. Hatli
8. Falahat
9. Kathed
10. Manhuta
11. Tikri
12. Samot
13. Tundi
14. Morthu
15. Dupper
By order,
V. C. PHARKA,
Chief Secretary.
__________
x`g foHkkx ¼lh vuqHkkx½
vf/klwpuk
f”keyk&2 14 twu] 2017
la[;k% x`g&lh ¼,Q½10&3@2015-&&jkT; ljdkj ;g lehphu le>rh gS fd dfri; LFkkuksa esa
vizkf/kd`r O;fDr;ksa ds izos”k dks jksdus ds fy, iwokZo/kkfu;kWa cjrh tkuh pkfg,(
vkSj Hkkjr ljdkj ds x`g ea=ky; us ,l0 vks0 568 ¼bZ½ rkjh[k 24&09&1974 }kjk] “kkldh; xqIr
ckr vf/kfu;e] 1923 dh /kkjk 2 dh mi/kkjk ¼8½ ds [k.M ¼x½ vkSj ¼?k½ esa fofufnZ’V ekeys ds lEcU/k esa]
dsUnzh; ljdkj ds d`R;ksa dks fgekpy izns”k ljdkj dks lkSaik gS( vkSj
vr% fgekpy izns”k ds jkT;iky] “kkldh; xqIr ckr vf/kfu;e] 1923 dh /kkjk 2 dh mi/kkjk ¼8½
ds [k.M ¼?k½ }kjk iznRRk “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ,rn~}kjk] mDr vf/kfu;e ds iz;kstuksa gsrq] uhps nh
xbZ vuqlwph ds LrEHk ¼1½ esa fofufnZ’V LFkku ¼LFkkuksa½ dks] bl vf/klwpuk ds jkti=] fgekpy izns”k esa
izdk”ku dh rkjh[k ls] izfrf’k) LFkku ?kksf’kr djrs gSaA
2292
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 20 twu] 2017@30 T;s"B] 1939
vuqlwph
LFkku dk uke
ifj{ks= vkSj vU; fooj.k
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
¼1½
¼2½
400@220 ds0 oh0
xkao cukyk] Mkd?kj o
Tkh0 vkbZ0 ,l0 mi dsUnz cukykA
rglhy vkSV] ftyk e.Mh]
fgekpy izns”kA
vkns”k }kjk]
izcks/k lDlsuk
iz/kku lfpo ¼x`g½A
&&&&&&&&&&
[Authoritative English text of this Department Notification No. Home-C (F) 10-3/2015,
dated____________as required under article 348(3) of the Constitution of India.]
Home Department (C-Section)
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 14th June, 2017
No. Home-C(F)10-3/2015.—WHEREAS, the State Government considers it expedient that
precautions should be taken to prevent the entry of unauthorized persons into certain places;
AND WHEREAS, the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, vide S.O. 568 (E)
dated 24-09-1974 has entrusted the functions of the Central Government to the Government of
Himachal Pradesh in relation to matter specified in clauses (c) and (d) of sub-section (8) of section
2 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (8)
of section-2 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923, the Governor of Himachal Pradesh hereby declares
that place(s) specified in column (1) of the SCHEDULE given below to be a prohibited place(s) for
the purposes of the said Act with effect from the date of publication of this Notification in the
Rajpatra, Himachal Pradesh.
SCHEDULE
Name of Place
Locality and other descriptions;
(1)
(2)
400/220 KV,
Village Banala , PO & Tehsil Aut
GIS Sub Station Banala.
District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh.
By order,
PRABODH SAXENA,
Principal Secretary (Home).
fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr
bysDVªkWfud gLrk{kfjr jkti=] oSclkbV http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in ij miyC/k gS ,oe~ vkWuykbu lR;kfir fd;k tk ldrk gS