jkti=] fgekpy izns'k

fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr

lkseokj] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

fgekpy izns'k ljdkj

TECHNICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 1^st July, 2017

No.EDN (TE) A (l) 7/2009-II.—The Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to order the

creation and filling up the following posts in Hydro Engineering College Bandla, District

Bilaspur in phased manner under Demand No. 27, Major Head-2203-00-112-01--SOON-Plan

Scheme, in public interest, with immediate effect as under:

67&jkti=@2017&03&07&2017

¼3341½

3342

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

Sr.

No.

Name of Post

Pay Scale

To be filled in the Year

2017-18

2018-19

2019-20 2020-21

No. of

posts

1.

Director-cum-

Principal

37400-67000+

10000GP

+3000SA

1

1

2.

Professor

(Engineering)

37400-67000+

10000GP

-

2

2

-

4

3.

Professor

(Applied Sciences

& Humanities)

37400-67000+

10000GP

1

-

-

-

1

4.

Associate

Professor

(Engineering)

37400-67000+

9000GP

0

4

4

4

12

5.

Associate

Professor (Applied

Sciences

& Humanities)

37400-67000+

9000GP

0

1

1

-

2

6.

Assistant

Professor

(Engineering)

15600-39100+

6000GP

0

16

8

8

32

7.

Assistant

Professor (Applied

Sciences

& Humanities)

15600-39100+

6000GP

6

-

-

-

6

8.

Assistant

Professor (Computer

Engineering)

15600-39100+

6000 GP

1

-

-

-

1

9.

Training &

Placement Officer

15600-39100+

6000GP

-

-

-

1

1

10.

Workshop

Superintendent

15600-39100+

6000GP

1

-

-

-

1

11.

Librarian

15600-39100+

6000GP

1

-

-

-

1

12.

Workshop

Instructor

10300-34800+

4200GP

4

4

4

-

12

3343

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

13.

Asstt. Controller

(F&A)

15600-39100+

5400GP

-

1

-

-

1

14.

Sr. Scale

Stenographer

15600-39100+

4400GP

1

-

-

-

1

15.

Supdt. Grade-II

15600-39100+

4800GP

1

-

-

-

1

16.

Computer

Assistant

10300-34800+

3800GP

-

2

-

-

2

17.

Sr. Assistant

10300-34800+

4400GP

2

2

1

-

5

18.

Hostel Supdt.

10300-34800+

3200GP

-

2

-

-

2

19.

Junior Engineer

(Civil)

10300-34800+

3800GP

-

1

-

-

1

20.

Clerk

5910-20200+

1900GP

2

-

-

-

2

21.

Jr. Office Asstt.

(IT)

5910-20200+

1950GP

-

2

2

-

4

22.

Lab. Technician

10300-34800+

3000GP

-

5

5

5

15

23.

Personal Assistant

10300-34800+

4800GP

-

1

-

-

1

24.

Lab. Attendant

4900-10680+

1300GP

-

5

5

4

14

25.

Store Attedant

4900-10680+

1300GP

1

-

-

1

2

Total Teaching and Technical

Supporting

22

48

32

23

125

The permission to outsource the services viz Driver, Cleaner-cum-conductor, Office Peon,

Sweeper, Watchman/Security Guard, Gardner/Mali, Plumber & Electrician as per requirement

from time to time in favour of Hydro Engineering College Society Bandla District Bilaspur is

also accorded.

By order,

SANJAY GUPTA

Principal Secretary (TE).

3344

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 16th August, 2016

No.: 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute exists between Shri Rajiv Goswami and other workers C/O Jagran Prakashan Limited,

Village Banoi, P.O. Rajol, Tehsil Shahpur, Near Kangra Airport, Pathankot-Mandi Highway,

District Kangra, H.P. and the Employer/Management, Jagran Prakashan Limited, Village Banoi,

P.O. Rajol, Tehsil Shahpur, Near Kangra Airport, Pathankot-Mandi Highway, District Kangra, H.P.

on the miscellaneous demands.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer-cum-Labour Inspector Dharamshala, District Kangra, he tried his level best to

settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has

been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section-5 of Section-12 of

the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by

the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as

per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

Demand No. 1:

“Whether the non-implementation of the recommendations of Majhithia Wage Board by the

General Manager, Jagran Prakashan Limited, Village Banoi, P.O. Rajol, Tehsil Shahpur, Near

Kangra Airport, Pathankot-Mandi Highway, District Kangra, H.P. is legal and justified? If not,

what benefits as per recommendations of the Majithia Wage Board the workers are entitled to from

the above employer/Management?”

Demand No.2:

“Whether the action of the General Manager, Jagran Prakashan Limited, Village Banoi,

P.O. Rajol, Tehsil Shahpur, Near Kangra Airport, Pathankot-Mandi Highway, District

Kangra, H.P. to victimize, transfer and terminate the services of the workers is legal and justified?

If not, what benefits the workers are entitled to from the above employer/ management?”

Demand No. 3:

“Whether the workers who are working during night shift are entitled to be paid night shift

allowance or not? If yes, on which ratio?”

Demand No. 7:

“Whether the action of the General Manager, Jagran Prakashan Limited, Village Banoi,

P.O. Rajol, Tehsil Shahpur, Near Kangra Airport, Pathankot-Mandi Highway, District Kangra, H.P.

not to promote and not to give annual increment to some of the workers is legal and justified? If

not, what benefits the above workers are entitled to from the above employer/management?”

3345

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

Demand No. 8:

“Whether the demand raised by the workers regarding medical claim policy worth Rs. 5

lacs and insurance policy worth Rs. 5 lacs from the General Manager, Jagran Prakashan Limited,

Village Banoi, P.O. Rajol, Tehsil Shahpur, Near Kangra Airport, Pathankot- Mandi Highway,

District Kangra, H.P. is legal and justified? If yes, what benefits/relief the workers are entitled to

from the above employer/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 29th August, 2016

No.: 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute exists between Smt. Sandhi Devi W/O Shri Nand Lal, R/O V.P.O. Dhanag, Tehsil Baijnath,

District Kangra, H.P. and Employer/Manager, M/S Baijnath Tea Estate Company Private Limited,

Village, P.O. & Tehsil Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of her alleged retirement w.e.f.

31-03-2014.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as

per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether retirement of Smt. Sandhi Devi W/O Shri Nand Lal, R/O V.P.O. Dhanag, Tehsil

Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P. by the Employer/Manager, M/S Baijnath Tea Estate Company

Private Limited, Village, P.O. & Tehsil Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 31-03-2014 on

attaining the age of 58 years whereas workman has alleged that she has completed 55 years of age

is illegal and unjustified? If yes, what relief of service benefits the above worker is entitled to from

the above management.”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

3346

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th August, 2016

No.:11-1/7(Lab)ID/2016/Joginder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute exists between Smt. Savita Devi W/O Shri Baldev Singh, R/O Village Bachkhera, P.O.

Tikroo, Tehsil Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Joginder

Forest Division, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of alleged time to time

termination from services as daily wages beldar during August, 1997 to December, 2009 and

finally during January, 2010.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February 2014 and as

per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether time to time termination of the services of Smt. Savita Devi W/O Shri Baldev

Singh, R/O Village Bachkhera, P.O. Tikroo, Tehsil Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. during

August, 1997 to December, 2009 and finally during January, 2010 by the Divisional Forest Officer,

Joginder Forest Division, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P., without complying with the

provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back

wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the

above employer?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th August, 2016

No.:11-5/99(Lab)ID/2016/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute exists between Shri Shiv Chand S/O Shri Loki Ram, R/O Village Chasak, P.O. Saichu,

Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. and (i) the Divisional Forest Officer, Wild Life Forest

Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. (ii) the Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division, Killar,

District Chamba, H.P. on the issue of alleged time to time termination from services as daily wages

beldar during year, 1994 to year, 2003 and finally during February, 2010.

3347

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February 2014 and as

per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether time to time termination of services of Shri Shiv Chand S/O Shri Loki Ram, R/O

Village Chasak, P.O. Saichu, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during year, 1994 to year, 2003

and finally during February, 2010 by (i) the Divisional Forest Officer, Wild Life Forest Division,

Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. (ii) the Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division, Killar, District

Chamba, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal

and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation

the above worker is entitled to from the above employers?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 23rd August, 2016

No.: 11-23/48(Lab)ID/2016-Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute

exists between Shri Sunder Singh S/O Shri Swaran Singh, R/O V.P.O. Deoli, Tehsil Amb, District

Una, H.P. and (i) the President/Managing Director, D.A.V. College Managing Committee, Arya

Samaj Bhawan, UP Block, Pittampura, Delhi-110034 (ii) the Principal, D.A.V. Senior Secondary

Public School, Ambota, District Una, H.P. on the issue of termination of his services w.e.f. 15-03-

2014.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as

per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

3348

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

“Whether termination of services of Shri Sunder Singh S/O Shri Swaran Singh, R/O V.P.O.

Deoli, Tehsil Amb, District Una, H.P. w.e.f.15-03-2014 after conducting domestic enquiry

by (i) the President/Managing Director, D.A.V. College Managing Committee, Arya Samaj

Bhawan, UP Block, Pittampura, Delhi-110034 (ii) the Principal, D.A.V. Senior Secondary

Public School, Ambota, District Una, H.P. who was employed as driver, without complying

with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what

amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker

is entitled to from the above employers/Management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 29th August, 2016

No.:11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute exists between Shri Suresh Kumar S/O Shri Amar Nath, R/O V.P.O. Jalot, Tehsil & District

Kangra, H.P. and (i) the Managing Director, Amar Ujala Publication Limited, Plot No. 22,23

Industrial Area, Nagrota Bagwan, Tehsil Nagrota Bagwan, District Kangra, H.P. (Principal

Employer) and (ii) the General Manager, Sham Professional Private Limited, D-130, Surya Place

Delhi Road, Meerut (contractor) on the issue of alleged termination from services w.e.f. 31-12-

2014.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as

per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether termination of the services of Shri Suresh Kumar S/O Shri Amar Nath, R/O

V.P.O. Jalot, Tehsil & District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 31-12-2014 by (i) the Managing Director, Amar

Ujala Publication Limited, Plot No. 22,23 Industrial Area, Nagrota Bagwan, Tehsil Nagrota

Bagwan, District Kangra, H.P. (Principal Employer) and (ii) the General Manager, Sham

Professional Private Limited, D-130, Surya Place Delhi Road, Meerut (contractor), without

complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not,

what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is

entitled to from the above employers?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

3349

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 14th June, 2016

No.: 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016/Kangra.—Whereas the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation

Officer, Palampur, District Kangra has submitted a report as provided under Section-12(4) of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Smt.

Babita Sharma W/O Shri Ashok Sharma, R/O V.P.O. Sullah, Tehsil Palampur, District Kangra,

H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Palampur Forest Division, Palampur, District Kangra, H.P.

as per demand notice dated 11-05-2015 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding her termination

of services.

Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that

during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and

amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts

for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said

dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the

parties to the industrial dispute.

Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under subsection-5 of

Section-12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above ex-

worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the

services w.e.f. 01-04-2006 before the above employer after delay of more than 9 years and has

worked only from October, 2002 to 31-03-2006.

Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising

the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-

IV-Loose, Dated 15th February 2014 and as provided in Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble

High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for

adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the

Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal

adjudication on following issue:-

“Whether alleged termination of the services of Smt. Babita Sharma W/O Shri Ashok

Sharma, R/O V.P.O. Sullah, Tehsil Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 01-04-2006 by and the

Divisional Forest Officer, Palampur Forest Division, Palampur, District Kangra, H.P., without

complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by workman, is legal

and justified; whereas she has raised the industrial dispute vide demand notice dated 11-05-2015

after lapse of more than 9 years. If not, keeping in view of working period from October, 2002 to

31-03-2006 and delay of more than 9 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back

wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the

above employer/management? ”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

3350

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 28th June, 2016

No.: 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016/Kangra.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation

Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra has submitted a report as provided under Section-12(4) of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri

Kuldeep Singh S/O Shri Beer Singh, R/O Village Fatehpur Hada, Tehsil Fatehpur, District Kangra,

H.P. and the Executive Engineer, Fatehpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Fatehpur, District Kangra, H.P. as

per demand notice dated on 07-08-2013 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding termination of

his services.

Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that

during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and

amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts

for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said

dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial

dispute.

Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub- section-5

of Section-12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above

ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during February,

1985 before the above employer after delay of more than 28 years and has worked during years

1977 to February, 1985.

Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising

the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-

IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble

High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for

adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal

Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue:—

“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Kuldeep Singh S/O Shri Beer Singh,

R/O Village Fatehpur Hada, Tehsil Fatehpur, District Kangra, H.P. during February, 1985 by and

the Executive Engineer, Fatehpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Fatehpur, District Kangra, H.P., without

complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by workman, is legal

and justified; whereas he has raised the industrial dispute vide demand notice dated 07-08-2013

after lapse of more than 28 years. If not, keeping in view of working period from year, 1977 to

February, 1985 respectively and delay of more than 28 years in raising the industrial dispute, what

amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above exworker is

entitled to from the above employer? ”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

3351

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 14th June, 2016

No.:11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute

exists between Shri Rajneesh Singh S/O Shri Kamal Singh, R/O Village Saloh, Sub Tehsil Ispur,

District Una, H.P. and the Principal, D.A.V. Centenary Pubic School Una, District Una, H.P. on the

issue of alleged termination of his services as security guard w.e.f. 13-06-2014.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as

per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether termination of the services of Shri Rajneesh Singh S/O Shri Kamal Singh, R/O

Village Saloh, Sub Tehsil Ispur, District Una, H.P. w.e.f. 13-06-2014, who was employed as

Security Guard by the Principal, D.A.V. Centenary Pubic School Una, District Una, H.P. without

complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not,

what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is

entitled to from the above employer?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 6th July, 2016

No.:11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute

exists between Shri Avtar Singh, President, DFL Workers Union, Deepak Fastener Limited,

Industrial Area, Tahliwal, District Una, H.P. and Employer/ Factory Manager, Deepak Fastener

Limited, Industrial Area, Tahliwal, District Una, H.P. on the issue of miscellaneous demands.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

3352

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as

per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether miscellaneous demands raised vide demand notices dated 26-03-2014 and 10-06-

2014 (copy enclosed) by Shri Avtar Singh, President, DFL Workers Union, Deepak Fastener

Limited, Industrial Area, Tahliwal, District Una, H.P. to be fulfilled by the Employer/ Factory

Manager, Deepak Fastener Limited, Industrial Area, Tahliwal, District Una, H.P. are legal justified

and maintainable? If yes, what relief and benefits the above workers are entitled to by the above

Manager/ employer.”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 18th July, 2016

No.: 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2016/Chamba.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation

Officer, Chamba has submitted a report as provided under Section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri Baldev Singh S/O

Shri Kanthu Ram, R/O Village Kuthal, P.O. Sach, Tehsil Killar, District Chamba, H.P. and the

Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar (Pangi), District Chamba, H.P. as per

demand notice dated 26-12-2007 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding time to time

termination of his services.

Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that

during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and

amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts

for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said

dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial

dispute.

Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub- section-5

of Section-12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above

ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal time to time termination from the services during

May, 1994 to 31-12-2001 before the above employer after delay of about 6 years.

Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising

the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-

IV-Loose, Dated 15th February 2014 and as provided in SubSection-1 of Section-10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble

High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for

3353

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal

Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue:—

“Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Late Shri Baldev Singh S/O Shri

Kanthu Ram, R/O Village Kuthal, P.O. Sach, Tehsil Killar, District Chamba, H.P. during May,

1994 to 31-12-2001 by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar (Pangi),

District Chamba, H.P., who has worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his industrial

dispute after about 6 years vide demand notice dated 26-12-2007, allegedly without complying with

the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view

delay of about 6 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past

service benefits and compensation the legal heir of the above ex-worker is entitled to from the

above employer/management? ”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 13th July, 2016

No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Ashok Kumar S/O Shri Hakam Singh,

R/O Village and Post Office Khanni, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand

notice dated-nil-received in Labour Office, Dharamshala on 04.03.2013 regarding his illegal

termination from the services by (1) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur, Tehsil

Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (2) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, Tehsil

Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District

Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during

the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala,

District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate

Government came to the conclusion that as per reply filed by the above employers worker has not

worked with the employers No. (1) & (2) and had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than

21 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 29.05.2015;

And whereas Shri Ashok Kumar S/O Shri Hakam Singh agitated the above orders of

declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High

Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 751/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal

Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 7.4.2016 and directed the respondents to consider

the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the

Hon’ble High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal

Pradesh State Electricity Board and others withineight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is

reproduced as follows;

3354

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents toconsider the

cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight weeks.

The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if

any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Ashok Kumar S/O Shri Hakam Singh, R/O

Village and Post Office Khanni, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990 by (1) The

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (2) The

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., who had

worked on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 21 years vide demand

notice dated-nil-received on 04.03.2013, without complying the provisions of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of

delay of more than 21 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority,

past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above

employer/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 30 May, 2016

No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Ashok Kumar S/O Shri Hoshiyar

Singh, R/O Village and Post Office Haddal, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a

demand notice dated-nil-received in Labour Office, Dharamshala on 13.06.2011 regarding his

illegal termination from the services by (1) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur,

Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (2) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali,

Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala,

District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be

settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section

12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala,

District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate

Government came to the conclusion that as per reply filed by the above employers worker has not

3355

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

worked with the employers No. (1) & (2) and had raised the dispute at a belated stage of about 21

years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 22.8.2013;

And whereas Shri Ashok Kumar S/O Shri Hoshiyar Singh agitated the above orders of

declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High

Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 784/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal

Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 7.4.2016 and directed the respondents to consider

the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the

Hon’ble High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal

Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment

is reproduced as follows;

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider

the cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if

any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Ashok Kumar S/O Shri Hoshiyar Singh,

R/O Village and Post Office Haddal, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990 by (1)

The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (2)

The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., who

had worked on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after about 21 years vide demand

notice dated-nil-received on 13.06.2011, without complying the provisions of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of

delay of about 21 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past

service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above

employer/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 18th May, 2016

No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Ashok Kumar S/O Shri Charan Singh,

R/O Village Dadheru, P.O. Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand

notice dated 23.7.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive

3356

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation

Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the

same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report

under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala,

District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as

appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of more than 22 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order

dated 5.11.2014;

And whereas Shri Ashok Kumar S/O Shri Charan Singh agitated the above orders of

declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High

Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 440/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal

Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 8.3.2016 and directed the respondents to consider

the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the

Hon’ble High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal

Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment

is reproduced as follows;

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioner, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight weeks.

The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006- IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Ashok Kumar S/O Shri Charan Singh,

R/O Village Dadheru, P.O. Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during April, 1989 by the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked as beldar

on daily wages for 24 days during year, 1986, for 137 days during year, 1987, for 236 days during

year, 1988 and for 31 days during year, 1989 respectively and has raised his industrial dispute after

more than 22 years vide demand notice dated 23.7.2011, without complying the provisions of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period of 24

days during year, 1986, 137 days during year, 1987, for 236 days during year, 1988 and for 31 days

during year, 1989 respectively and delay of more than 22 years in raising the industrial dispute,

what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker

is entitled to from the above employer/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

3357

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 11 April, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2016-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Bajro S/O Shri Chetu, R/O Village

Angari, P.O. Preena, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated

30.05.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. Division, Bharmour, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation

Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same

could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report

under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,

District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate

Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of

more than 8 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 16.1.2013;

And whereas Shri Bajro S/O Shri Chetu agitated the above orders of declining of reference

of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of Himachal

Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 155/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off

the civil writ petition on 23.2.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the

petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the Hon’ble High

Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State

Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced

as follows;

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight weeks.

The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4.

The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if

any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Bajro S/O Shri Chetu, R/O Village

Angari, P.O. Preena, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during February, 2003 by the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Bharmour, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on

daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 8 years vide demand notice dated

30.05.2011, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and

justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 8 years in raising the industrial dispute,

what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker

is entitled to from the above employer/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

3358

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 1st July, 2016

No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Balwant Singh S/O Shri Jamito Ram,

R/O and Post Office Aundh, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice

dated-nilreceived in Labour Office, Dharamshala on 13.06.2011 regarding his illegal termination

from the services by (1) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur, Tehsil Nurpur,

District Kangra, H.P. (2) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, Tehsil Nurpur,

District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra,

H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the

course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala,

District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate

Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of

more than 24 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 13.09.2013;

And whereas Shri Balwant Singh S/O Shri Jamito Ram agitated the above orders of

declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High

Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 785/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal

Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 7.4.2016 and directed the respondents to consider

the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the

Hon’ble High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal

Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment

is reproduced as follows;

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents toconsider the

cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight weeks.

The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4.

The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if

any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Balwant Singh S/O Shri Jamito Ram, R/O

and Post Office Aundh, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during October, 1986 by (1) The

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (2) The

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., who had

worked on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 24 years vide demand

notice dated-nil-received on 13.06.2011, without complying the provisions of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 24 years in

3359

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and

compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

____________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001 11, the April, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2016-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Begmu W/O Shri Bishamber Nath,

R/O Village and Post Office Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand

notice dated 7.5.2012 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the Executive

Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour

Officercum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial

dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings,

where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour

Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,

District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate

Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of

more than 6 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 28.10.2013;

And whereas Smt. Begmu W/O Shri Bishamber Nath agitated the above orders of declining

of reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 195/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the civil writ petition on 24.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case

of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the Hon’ble

High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh

State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is

reproduced as follows;

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider

the cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006- IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

3360

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

“Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Begmu W/O Shri Bishamber Nath, R/O

Village and Post Office Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during October, 2005 by the

Executive Engineer, I.P.H. /H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P., who

had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised her industrial dispute after more than 6 years

vide demand notice dated 07.05.2012, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 6 years in raising the

industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation

the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer /management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

____________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 11April, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2016-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Filmi Devi W/O Shri Tek Chand,

R/O Village and Post Office Purhti, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand

notice dated 7.5.2012 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-

cum- Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute

amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where

after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour

Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,

District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate

Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of

more than 8 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 28.10.2013;

And whereas Smt. Filmi Devi W/O Shri Tek Chand agitated the above orders of declining

of reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 195/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has

disposed off the civil writ petition on 24.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case

of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the Hon’ble

High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh

State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is

reproduced as follows;

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and makea decision within eight weeks.

The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

3361

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the

Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006- IV-Loose, Dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

“Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Filmi Devi W/O Shri Tek Chand, R/O

Village and Post Office Purhti, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during June, 2003 by the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P., who had

worked as beldar on daily wages for 21 days during year, 2001, 63 days during year, 2002 and 16

days during year, 2003 respectively and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 8 years

vide demand notice dated 07.05.2012, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period of 21 days during year,

2001, 63 days during year, 2002 and 16 days during year, 2003 respectively and delay of more than

8 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits

and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

fuokZpu foHkkx

vf/klwpuk

f”keyk&171009] 3 tqykbZ] 2017

la[;k 3&1@2017&bZ-,y-,u-&II.—Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx dh vf/klwpuk la[;k% 479@16@2017]

fnukad 3 tqykbZ] 2017 rnkuqlkj 12 vk’kk<+ 1939 ¼”kd½ tks fd jk’Vªirh; fuokZpu] 2017 ds erksa dh

x.kuk ls lEcfU/kr gS] dks vaxszth :ikUrj lfgr tulk/kkj.k dh lwpuk gsrq iqu% izdkf”kr fd;k tkrk gSA

vkns”k ls]

eq[; fuokZpu vf/kdkjh]

fgekpy izns”kA

&&&&&&&&&&

Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx

fuokZpu lnu] v”kksd jksM+] ubZ fnYyh&171001

rkjh[k% 3 tqykbZ] 2017

12 vk"kk<+] 1939 ¼”kd½

vf/klwpuk

la[;k 479@16@2017-& jk"Vªirh; vkSj mijk"Vªirh; fuokZpu fu;e] 1974 ds fu;e 27 ds

vuqlj.k esa Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx 20 tqykbZ] 2017 ¼xq:okj½ dks ,sls fnu ds :i esa ftl fnu vkSj ml

3362

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

fnu ds 11%-00 cts iwokZg~u dk le; ml le; ds :i esa fu;r djrk gS] ftl le; ij] jk"Vªirh;

fuokZpu] 2017 ds erksa dh x.kuk ubZ fnYyh esa fjVfuZax vkfQlj ds dk;kZy; ds d{k la0 62] laln Hkou]

ubZ fnYyh esa dh tk,xhA

vkns”k ls]

ofjUnj dqekj

iz/kku lfpoA

&&&&&&&&&&

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA

Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi-ll000l

Dated: 3rd July, 2017

Ashadha 12, 1939 (Saka)

NOTIFICATION

No. 479/16/2017.—In pursuance of rule 27 of the Presidential and Vice-Presidential

Elections Rules, 1974, the Election Commission of India hereby appoints the 20th July, 2017

(Thursday) as the day on which, and 11:00 A.M. of that day as the time at which, the counting of

votes, for the Presidential Election, 2017, shall take place at the office of the Returning Officer in

Room No. 62, Parliament House, New Delhi.

By order

VARINDER KUMAR

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.

__________

In the Court of Arindam Chaudhary, IAS, Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional

Magistrate, Hamirpur (H. P.)

In the matter of :

Surinder Kumar aged 25 years s/o Shri Battan Singh, r/o Village Bugdhar, P.O. Chabutra,

Tehsil Sujanpur, District Hamirpur (H.P.)

and

Kamini aged 22 years d/o Shri Hari Krishan, r/o Village Bugdhar, P.O. Chabutra, Tehsil

Sujanpur, District Hamirpur (H.P.)

. . Applicants

Versus

General Public

Subject.— Notice under Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Surinder Kumar and Kamini have filed an application u/s 16 of Special Marriage Act,

1954 alongwith affidavit and other supported documents in the court of undersigned in which they

stated that they solemnized marriage on 28-02-2017.

3363

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

Therefore, the General Public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who

has any objection for this marriage can file the objection personally or in writing before this court

on or before 10-07-2017. The objection received after 10-07-2017 will not be entertained and

marriage will be registered accordingly.

Issued today on 08-06-2017 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate,

Hamirpur (H.P.).

__________

In the Court of Shri S. K. Prashar, HAS, Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional

Officer(c), Bhoranj, District Hamirpur (HP)

1.

Ravi Kumar s/o Suhru Ram, r/o Village Lajhyani, P.O. Nagrota Gazian,, Tehsil

Bhoranj, District Hamirpur, H.P.

2.

Smt. Mahalaxmi d/o Dev Narayan, r/o C 4250, Pooth Kalan Nithari Sultanpuri, C

Block North West Delhi, Delhi-110086.

Versus

General Public

Subject.—Application for the registration of marriage under section 16 of Special Marriage Act,

1954 (Central Act) as amended by Marriage Laws (Amendment Act 01, 49 of 2001).

Shri Ravi Kumar s/o Suhru Ram, r/o Village Lajhyani, P.O. Nagrota Gazian,, Tehsil

Bhoranj, District Hamirpur, H.P. and Smt. Mahalaxmi d/o Dev Narayan, r/o C 4250, Pooth Kalan

Nithari Sultanpuri, C Block North West Delhi, Delhi-110086 have filed an application alongwith

affidavits in this court under section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 (Central Act) as amended

by the Marriage Laws (Amendment Act 01, 49 of 2001) that they have solemnized their marriage

ceremony on 21-01-2017 at Awah Devi Mata Temple, Awah Devi, Tehsil Tauni Devi, District

Hamirpur as per Hindu Rites and Customs and they are living together as husband and wife since

then. Hence their marriage may be registered under Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who

has any objections regarding this marriage can file the objections personally or in writing before

this court on or before 14-07-2017. After that no objections will be entertained and marriage will

be registered accordingly.

Issued today on 08-06-2017 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate,

Bhoranj, District Hamirpur, H.P.

3364

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

In the Court of Vijay Kumar Dhiman, HAS, Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate,

Sujanpur, District Hamirpur (H. P.)-176110

1.

Shri Desh Raj aged 53 years s/o Shri Murli Ram, r/o Ward No. 8 Sujanpur, Tehsil

Sujanpur, District Hamirpur, HP.

2.

Seema Devi aged 41 years d/o Shri Durlabh Havaldar, r/o H. No. C-30 Vasundhara

New Ashok Nagar, Vasundhara Enclave East Delhi-11006.

Versus

General Public

Application for the registration of marriage under section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954

(Central Act) as amended by Marriage Laws (Amendment Act 01, 49 of 2001).

Shri Desh Raj aged 53 years s/o Shri Murli Ram, r/o Ward No. 8 Sujanpur, Tehsil

Sujanpur, District Hamirpur, HP. and Seema Devi aged 41 years d/o Shri Durlabh Havaldar, r/o H.

No. C-30 Vasundhara New Ashok Nagar, Vasundhara Enclave East Delhi-96 have filed an

application alongwith affidavits in this court under section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954

(Central Act) as amended by marriage Laws (Amendment act 01, 49 of 2001) that they have

solemnized their Marriage ceremony on 15-04-2017 at Jawala Ji Mata Mandir Jawalamukhi,

District Kangra, HP as per Hindu Rites and Customs and they are living together as husband and

wife since then. Hence their marriage may be registered under Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who

has any objections regarding this marriage can file the objections personally or in writing before

this court on or before 21-07-2017. After that no objections will be entertained and marriage will

be registered accordingly.

Issued today on 15-06-2017 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate,

Sujanpur, District Hamirpur (H.P.).

__________

c vnkyr fookg iathdj.k vf/kdkjh] cM+lj] mi&e.My cM+lj] ftyk gehjiqj] fg0 iz0

1.

Amarjit aged 40 years s/o Shri Prakash Chand, r/o Village Raggar Rajputan, P.O.

Batarli, Tehsil Barsar, District Hamirpur (H.P.).

2.

Sujata Kumari aged 34 years d/o Shri Prem Chand, r/o Village Gopalnagar, P. O.

Daruhi, Tehsil & District Hamirpur (H.P.)

- - izkFkhZ

cuke

vke turk

^{- -} izfroknh

vke turk dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ ,d o nks us bl U;k;ky; esa fookg iathdj.k

djokus dk vkosnu fd;k gSA vr% bl b'rgkj }kjk vke turk o mijksDr vkosnudrkZ ds ekrk&firk dks

3365

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

bl fookg ds iathdj.k ckjs ,rjkt gks rks fnukad 26&07&2017 ;k blls iwoZ izkr% 10-00 cts rd bl

U;k;ky; esa vkifŸk ntZ djok ldrs gSaA bl frfFk ds ckn dksbZ mtj Lohdkj ugha fd;k tkosxkA

vkt fnukad 13&06&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj ,oa eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh fd;k x;kA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

fookg iathdj.k vf/kdkjh]

cM+lj] mi&e.My cM+lj] ftyk gehjiqj] fg0 iz0A

&&&&&&&

c vnkyr tukc lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh ,oa uk;c rglhynkj] pf<;kj

ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0

eqdíek la[;k % 11/NT/2017

rkjh[k nk;jk % 08&03&2017

Jh yky flag iq= Jh izflUnk jke] fuoklh xkao n#x] Mkd?kj n#x] mi&rglhy pf<;kj] ftyk

dkaxM+k ¼fg0 iz0½

- - izkFkhZ

cuke

vke turk

^{- -} izR;kFkhZ

Jh yky flag iq= Jh izflUnk jke] fuoklh xkao n#x] Mkd?kj n#x] mi&rglhy pf<;kj] ftyk

dkaxM+k ¼fg0 iz0½ us bl dk;kZy;@U;k;ky; esa izkFkZuk&i= is'k fd;k gS fd esjk uke vk/kkj dkMZ] ifjokj

jftLVj o Ldwy izek.k i= esa lgh uke yky flag ntZ gS ijUrq jktLo vfHkys[k egky n#x esa bUrdky

rLnhd djrs le; esjk uke yky pUn ntZ gS tks fd xyr gSA vkosnd viuk uke jktLo vfHkys[k

egky n#x esa lgh uke yky flag iq= izflUnk jke] fuoklh xkao uuokM] Mkd?kj uuokM] mi&rglhy

pf<;kj] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0 ntZ djokuk pkgrk gSA

vr% vke turk dks bl jkti= b'rgkj ds ek/;e ls lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl ckjs fdlh dks

dksbZ mtj o ,rjkt gks rks og fnukad 12&07&2017 dks v/kksgLrk{kjh dh vnkyr esa vlkyru ;k

odkyru gkftj gksdj viuk i{k j[k ldrs gSaA xSj gkftjh dh lwjr esa ,d rjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ

tkosxhA

vkt fnukad 31&05&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&]

lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh]

pf<;kj] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0A

&&&&&&&

dk;kZy; uk;c rglhynkj dksVyk ,oa lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh] mi&rglhy dksVyk

Jh izse pUn jk.kk

cuke

vke turk

fo"k;-&&izkFkZuk&i= cjk;s uke n#LrhA

uksfVl %

3366

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

loZlk/kkj.k vke turk dks bl uksfVl }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd Jh izse pUn jk.kk iq= clUr

flag] fuoklh [kSfj;ka] mi rglhy dksVyk] ftyk dkaxM+k us bl dk;kZy; esa izkFkZuk i= e; 'kiFk i=

lfgr eqdíek nk;j fd;k gS fd esjk uke vk/kkj dkMZ o jftLVj ifjokj rFkk Ldwy izek.k i= esa izse

pUn jk.kk ntZ gS tks fd lgh gSA tcfd esjk uke jktLo vfHkys[k egky [kSfj;ka esa izse flag ntZ gS tks

fd xyr gSA bl b'rgkj ds }kjk leLr turk rFkk lEcfU/kr lEcfU/k;ksa dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd

;fn fdlh dks mi;qZDr uke n#Lrh ckjs dksbZ ,rjkt gks rks og viuk ,rjkt gekjh vnkyr esa fnukad

07&07&2017 dks vlkyru ;k odkyru vkdj miuk ,rjkt is'k dj ldrk gS vU;Fkk eqrkfod 'kiFk

i= uke n#Lrh ckjs vkns'k ikfjr dj fn;s tk,axsA

vkt fnukad 06&06&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh fd;k x;kA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

uk;c rglhynkj ,oa lgk;d lekgrkZ]

dksVyk] ftyk dkaxM+kA

&&&&&&&&&&&&&

c vnkyr lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh ,oa dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh lSat]

ftyk dqYyw] fgekpy izns'k

Jh uUn jke iq= Jh Hkxr jke] fuoklh xkao /kkjBk] Mk0 ctkgjk] mi&rglhy lSat] ftyk dqYyw]

fgekpy izns'k

- - oknhA

cuke

vke turk

fo"k;-&&xzke iapk;r fjdkMZ esa 'kknh bUnzkt fd, tkus ckjsA

loZlk/kkj.k dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd Jh uUn jke iq= Jh Hkxr jke] fuoklh xkao /kkjBk] Mk0

ctkgjk] mi&rglhy lSat] ftyk dqYyw us izkFkZuk i= v/kksgLrk{kjh ds dk;kZy; esa izLrqr fd;k gS fd

izkFkhZ us fnukad 25&3&2015 dks Jherh lohuk Hkkjrh iq=h Jh [kq'kh jke iq= Jh osn jke] fuoklh

ckykcsgM+] QkVh <kyiq=] dksBh egkjktk] rglhy o ftyk dqYyw ls 'kknh dh gSA bu dh 'kknh dk bUnzkt

iapk;r fjdkMZ nsgqjh/kkj] mi&rglhy lSat] ftyk dqYyw esa u gSA izkFkhZ us bl lEcU/k esa ,d 'kiFki= Hkh

bl lEcU/k esa izLrqr fd;k gSA

vr% bl b'rgkj }kjk loZlk/kkj.k dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl lEcU/k esa fdlh Hkh O;fDr dks

fdlh izdkj dh vkifÙk gks rks og vlkyru ;k odkyru viuh vkifÙk bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad

13&7&2017 rd ;k blls iwoZ izLrqr dj ldrk gSA vU;Fkk bldk bUnzkt xzke iapk;r fjdkMZ nsgqjh/kkj]

mi&rglhy lSat] ftyk dqYyw esa djok fn;k tk,xkA

vkt fnukad 13&6&17 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh ,oa dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]

lSat] ftyk dqYywA

3367

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

c vnkyr lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh@dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh] mi&rglhy lSat]

ftyk dqYyw] fg0 iz0

rkis jke vk;q 56 lky iq= Jh ufgUnw jke] fuoklh xkao f'k;kmxh] Mkd?kj /kkmxh] mi&rglhy

lSat] ftyk dqYyw] fgekpy izns'k

- - izkFkhZA

cuke

vke turk

fo"k;-&&xzke iapk;r fjdkMZ esa fg0 iz0 tUe ,oa e`R;q vf/kfu;e ds rgr iq=h dk uke o tUe frfFk ntZ

djus ckjsA

loZ lk/kkj.k dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd rkis jke vk;q 56 lky] iq= Jh ufgUnw jke] fuoklh xkao

f'k;kmxh] Mk0 /kkmxh] mi&rglhy lSat] ftyk dqYyw] fgekpy izns'k us bl vnkyr esa ,d nj[okLr

xqtkjh gS fd mldh iq=h fiaxyk nsoh dk uke o tUe frfFk tksfd fnukad 15 tuojh] 2010 gS] xzke

iapk;r /kkmxh ds tUe jftLVj@ifjokj jftLVj esa ntZ ugha gSA ftls ntZ djus ckjs ,d 'kiFk i= Hkh

izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ us iq=h dk uke o tUe frfFk iapk;r mijksDr ds fjdkMZ esa ntZ

djus dh izkFkZuk dh gSA

vr% bl b'rgkj }kjk loZlk/kj.k dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl lEcU/k esa fdlh Hkh O;fDr dks

fdlh izdkj dh vkifÙk gks rks og vlkyru ;k odkyru viuh vkifÙk bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad

13&07&2017 ;k blls iwoZ izLrqr dj ldrk gS vU;Fkk bldk bUnzkt xzke iapk;r /kkmxh] mi&rglhy

lSat ds fjdkMZ esa djok fn;k tk,xkA

vkt fnukad 13&06&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh gqvkA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh@dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]

mi&rglhy lSat] ftyk dqYyw] fg0 iz0A

&&&&&&&&&

vnkyrh b'rgkj

c vnkyr Jh dfiy rksej] dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh ¼rglhynkj½ jktx<+]

ftyk fljekSj ¼fg0 iz0½

Jh lrh'k dqekj iq= Jh jes'k dqekj] fuoklh FkM+k] Mk0 nkgu] rglhy jktx<+] ftyk fljekSj]

fg0 iz0A

cuke

vke turk

mijksDr izkFkZuk&i= Jh lrh'k dqekj iq= Jh jes'k dqekj] fuoklh FkM+k] Mk0 nkgu] rglhy

jktx<+] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0 us vkosnu i= izLrqr djds izkFkZuk dh gS fd mldh tUe frfFk

25&4&1987 gS] ijUrq xzke iapk;r nkgu ds fjdkMZ esa 26&8&1987 ntZ dh xbZ gS tks fd xyr gSA

blfy, vkosnudrkZ us fuosnu fd;k gS fd xzke iapk;r nkgu] rglhy jktx<+ ds fjdkMZ esa tUe frfFk

25&4&1987 lgh ntZ dh tk,A ftls izkFkhZ vc ntZ djokuk pkgrk gSA

3368

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl lEcU/k esa ;fn fdlh O;fDr

dks mtj ;k ,rjkt gks rks og Lo;a vFkok vius izfrfuf/k }kjk fefr 13&07&2017 dks lqcg nl cts

vnkyr esa mifLFkr vkdj ,rjkt izLrqr djs] clwjr nhxj Jh lrh'k dqekj iq= jes'k dqekj dh lgh

tUe frfFk dks ntZ djus ds vkns'k tkjh dj fn;s tk;saxsA

vkt fnukad 13&06&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA

eksgjA

dfiy rksej]

dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]

¼rglhynkj½ jktx<+] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A

&&&&&&&&

vnkyrh b'rgkj

c vnkyr Jh dfiy rksej] dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh ¼rglhynkj½ jktx<+]

ftyk fljekSj ¼fg0 iz0½

Jherh iq"ik nsoh iRuh Jh 'ke'ksj flag] fuoklh 'kk;k Ncjksu] rglhy jktx<+] ftyk fljekSj]

fg0 iz0A

cuke

vke turk

mijksDr izkFkZuk&i= Jherh iq"ik nsoh iRuh Jh 'ke'ksj flag] fuoklh 'kk;k Ncjksu] rglhy

jktx<+] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0 us vkosnu i= izLrqr djds izkFkZuk dh gS fd mldk uke xzke iapk;r usjh

dksVyh] rglhy jktx<+ esa 'kkfyuh ntZ fd;k x;k gS tks fd xyr gS D;ksafd mldk okLrfod uke

iq"iknsoh gS blfy, okfn;k us fuosnu fd;k gS fd xzke iapk;r usjh dksVyh] rglhy jktx<+ Ldwy f'k{kk

izek.k i= ds eqrkfod mldk uke iq"iknsoh ntZ fd;k tk,A

vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl lEcU/k esa ;fn fdlh O;fDr

dks mtj ;k ,rjkt gks rks og Lo;a vFkok vius izfrfuf/k }kjk fefr 13&07&2017 dks lqcg nl cts

vnkyr esa mifLFkr vkdj ,rjkt izLrqr djs] clwjr nhxj Jherh iq"iknsoh iRuh 'ke'ksj flag dk lgh

uke ntZ djus ds vkns'k tkjh dj fn;s tk;saxsA

vkt fnukad 13&06&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA

eksgjA

dfiy rksej]

dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]

¼rglhynkj½ jktx<+] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A

3369

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

c vnkyr tukc pUnzeksgu pkSgku] uk;c rglhynkj ,oa dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]

mi&rglhy ukjx] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0

Jh ft;k yky iq= Jh tksxsUnz flag] fuoklh xzke pC;ksxk c>sj] Mk0 ljlw] mi&rglhy ukjx]

ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A

cuke

vke turk

nj[okLr tsj/kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969-

Jh ft;k yky iq= Jh tksxsUnz flag] fuoklh xzke pC;ksxk c>sj] Mk0 ljlw] mi&rglhy ukjx]

ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0 us bl vnkyr esa izkFkZuk&i= e; 'kiFk i= xqtkjk gS fd mldh iq=h dq0 dfj'ek

nsoh dk tUe fnukad 27&03&2012 dks gqvk gS] ftldk bUnzkt xzke iapk;r nzkcyh] mi&rglhy ukjx]

ftyk fljekSj esa ntZ ugha gqvk gSA

vr% bl b'rgkj }kjk gj vke o [kkl dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh dks mDr uke ;k

frfFk iapk;r fjdkMZ esa ntZ djus ckjs dksbZ ,rjkt gks rks fnukad 17&07&2017 dks ;k blls iwoZ vnkyr

esa gkftj gksdj viuk ,rjkt is'k dj ldrk gS vU;Fkk lfpo] xzke iapk;r dks lEcfU/kr mDr uke o

tUe frfFk ntZ djus ckjs vkns'k tkjh dj fn, tk;saxsA

vkt fnukad 13&06&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA

eksgjA

pUnzeksgu pkSgku]

uk;c rglhynkj ,oa dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]

mi&rglhy ukjx] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A

&&&&&&&&

In the Court of Collector, District Solan, H.P.

Case No.

Instituted on

13/13 of 2013

30.10.2013

State of Himachal Pradesh

v/s

M/S Optima Construction Pvt. Ltd.

Notice.—Proceedings U/s 118 of H.P. Tenancy and Land Reforms Act,1972.

WHEREAS, a case for violation of Section 118 of Himachal Pradesh Tenancy & and

Reform Act, 1972 has been instituted against M/S Optima Construction Pvt. Ltd., Office at 1162

Sector-13, Urban Estate Karnal (Haryana) through its Director, Sh. Chander Parkash, s/o Sh.

Shankar Dass, who has purchased the land comprised in Khasra No’s. 60/4, 61/4, 68/6, 69/6, 70/6,

71/6, 72/6, 72/14, 73/14, 74/14, 75/25, 78/26, 27, 28, 29, 63/30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 43, 52, 8,

79/31, 80/31, kita-29 measuring 108-16 Mutation No. 92-93-94-95-96-97 dated: 28-03-2011, in

favour of M/S Optima Construction Pvt. Ltd situated in Mauja Banani, Tehsil Kasauli, District

Solan (H.P) from the permission of Government of H.P vide letter No Rev-B(F)(10)-94/2011 dated

16-03-2011 for establishing a housing colony. The summons sent to the Respondent for his

evidence on available address has been received un-served with the report that the above

3370

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 tqykbZ] 2017@12 vk"kk<+] 1939

respondent is not residing at the given address. Thus the service of summon cannot be affected in

an ordinary way.

NOW THEREFORE, this publication under order 5 Rule 20 CPC is hereby issued to the

M/S White Water Beverages Pvt. Limited, who are informed through this notice that they should

appear in this court on 05-08-2017 at 2:00 PM personally or through counsel failing which the ex-

parte proceeding shall be taken according to law.

Given, under my hand and the seal of this court on 30th day of June, 2017.

Sd/-

District Collector,

Solan. District Solan H.P.

__________

In the Court of Collector, District Solan, H.P.

Case No.

Instituted on

09/13 of 2017

29.03.2017

State of Himachal Pradesh

Versus

M/S White Water Beverages Pvt.

Limited, Mauja Doduwala, Tehsil

Baddi, District Solan Himachal

Pradesh.

Notice.—Proceedings U/s 118 of H.P. Tenancy and Land Reforms Act,1972.

WHEREAS, a case for violation of Section 118 of Himachal Pradesh Tenancy & Land

Reform Act, 1972 has been instituted against M/S White Water Beverages Pvt. Limited, Mauja

Doduwal, Tehsil Baddi, District Solan Himachal Pradesh, who has purchased the land comprised in

Khasra No’s. 5, 6, 7, 8, Kita 4 measuring 11-7 bighas situated in mauja Doduwala, Tehsil, Baddi

and District Solan, Himachal Pradesh with the permission of H.P. Government vide letter no. Rev.

B.F.(10)-118/98 dated 21.07.1998 for established a industry unit. The summons sent on available

address have been received un-served with the report that the above respondents are not residing at

the given address. Thus the service of summon cannot be affected in an ordinary way.

NOW THEREFORE, this publication under order 5 Rule 20 CPC is hereby issued to the

M/S White Water Beverages Pvt. Limited, who are informed through this notice that they should

appear in this court on 05-08-2017 at 2:00 PM personally or through counsel failing which the ex-

parte proceeding shall be taken according to law.

Given, under my hand and the seal of this court on 30th day of June, 2017.

Sd/-

District Collector,

Solan. District Solan H.P.

fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr

bysDVªkWfud gLrk{kfjr jkti=] oSclkbV http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in ij miyC/k gS ,oe~ vkWuykbu lR;kfir fd;k tk ldrk gS