jkti=] fgekpy izns'k
fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr
eaxyokj] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
fgekpy izns'k ljdkj
dkfeZd foHkkx
lfpoky; iz'kklu lsok,a&A
vf/klwpuk
f'keyk&2] 19 twu] 2017
la[;k% ih0bZ0vkj0¼l-iz-ls-&I½&ch¼2½13@2014-&fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky] Hkkjr ds lafo/kku ds
vuqPNsn 309 ds ijUrqd }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] fgekpy izns'k yksd lsok vk;ksx
ds ijke'kZ ls] fgekpy izns'k dkfeZd foHkkx ¼lfpoky; iz'kklu lsok,a½ esa vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh] oxZ&I
68&jkti=@2017&04&07&2017
¼3371½
3372
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
¼jktif=r½ ds in ds fy, bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu mikcU/k “d” ds vuqlkj HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;e
cukrs gaS] vFkkZr~%&
1- laf{kIr uke vkSj izkjEHk-&(1) bu fu;eksa dk laf{kIr uke fgekpy izns'k dkfeZd foHkkx
¼lfpoky; iz'kklu lsok,a½ vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh] oxZ&I (jktif=r) HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;e] 2017 gS A
(2) ;s fu;e jkti=] fgekpy izns'k esa izdkf'kr fd, tkus dh rkjh[k ls izo`Ÿk gkasxsA
vkns'k }kjk]
gLrk{kfjr@&
vfrfjDr eq[; lfpo ¼lfpoky; iz'kklu½A
&&&&&&&&&
mikcU/k ^^d**
fgekpy izns'k dkfEkZd foHkkx ¼lfpoky; iz'kklu lsok,a½ esa vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh] oxZ&I ¼jktif=r½ ds in
ds fy, HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;e
1- in dk uke-&vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh
2- in dh la[;k-& 01 ¼,d½
3- oxhZdj.k-&oxZ&I ¼jktif=r½
4- osrueku-&fu;fer in/kkjh ¼in/kkfj;ksa½ ds fy, is cSa.M%& ` 10300&34800@& tek
`5000@& xzsM is `15600&39100@& tek ` 5400@& xzsM is ¼izkjfEHkd osru ds fcuk nks o"kZ dh
fu;fer lsok ds I'pkr~½A
5- p;u vFkok vp;u in-&Pk;uA
6- lh/kh HkrhZ ds fy, vk;q-&ykxw ughaA
7- lh/ks HkrhZ fd, tkus okys O;fDr ¼O;fDr;ksa½ ds fy, visf{kr U;wure 'kSf{kd vkSj vU;
vgZrk,a-& ¼d½ vfuok;Z vgZrk¼,a½ % ykxw ughaA
¼[k½ okaNuh; vgZrk¼,a½ % ykxw ughaA
8- lh/ks HkrhZ fd, tkus okys O;fDr ¼O;fDr;ksa½ ds fy, fofgr vk;q vkSj 'kSf{kd vgZrk,a izksUur
O;fDr ¼O;fDr;ksa½ dh n'kk esa ykxw gksaxh ;k ugha-& vk;q % ykxw ughaA
'kSf{kd vgZrk,a % tSlh uhps LraHk la[;k 11 ds lkeus fofgr gSaA
9- ifjoh{kk dh vof/k] ;fn dksbZ gks-&nks o"kZ] ftldk ,d o"kZ ls vuf/kd ,slh vkSj vof/k ds
fy, foLrkj fd;k tk ldsxk] tSlk l{ke izkf/kdkjh fo'ks"k ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa vkSj dkj.kksa dks fyf[kr esa
vfHkfyf[kr djds vkns'k nsA
10- HkrhZ dh i)fr% HkrhZ lh/kh gksxh ;k izksUufr@ [email protected] }kjk vkSj fofHkUu
i)fr;ksa }kjk Hkjs tkus okys in ¼inksa½ dh izfr'krrk-&'kr izfr'kr izksUUkfr }kjkA
3373
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
11- izksUufr] lsd.Mes.V] LFkkukUrj.k }kjk HkrhZ dh n'kk esa os Jsf.k;ka ¼xszM½] ftuls izksUufr@
[email protected] fd;k tk,xk-&ofj"B lgk;dksa esa ls izksUufr }kjk tks vFkZ'kkL=@lkaf[;dh@
okf.kT;@xf.kr esa ekU;rk izkIr fu”.kkr mikf/k ¼ekLVlZ fMxzh½ j[krs gks rFkk fofgr vgZrk vfHkizkIr djus
ds i'pkr~ ftudk ikap o"kZ dk fu;fer lsokdky ;k xzsM esa dh xbZ yxkrkj rnFkZ lsok] ;fn dksbZ gks] dks
lfEefyr djds ikap o”kZ dk fu;fer lsokdky gksA
¼1½ izksUufr ds lHkh ekeyksa esa] in ij fu;fer fu;qfDr ls iwoZ lEHkjd ¼iks"kd½ in esa dh xbZ
yxkrkj rnFkZ lsok] ;fn dksbZ gks] izksUufr ds fy, bu fu;eksa esa ;Fkkfofgr lsokdky ds fy, bl 'krZ ds
v/khu jgrs gq, x.kuk esa yh tk,xh] fd lEHkjd ¼iks"kd½ izoxZ esa rnFkZ fu;qfDr@izksUufr] HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr
fu;eksa ds micU/kksa ds vuqlkj p;u dh mfpr Lohdk;Z izfØ;k dks viukus ds i'pkr~ dh xbZ Fkh%
ijUrq mu lHkh ekeyksa esa] ftuesa dksbZ dfu"B O;fDr lEHkjd ¼iks"kd½ in esa vius dqy lsokdky
¼rnFkZ vk/kkj ij dh xbZ rnFkZ lsok lfgr] tks fu;fer lsok@ fu;qfDr ds vuqlkj.k esa gks½ ds vk/kkj ij
mi;qZDr fufnZ"V micU/kksa ds dkj.k fopkj fd, tkus dk ik= gks tkrk gS] ogka vius&vius
izoxZ@in@dkMj esa mlls ofj"B lHkh O;fDr fopkj fd, tkus ds ik= le>s tk,axs vkSj fopkj djrs
le; dfu"B O;fDr ls Åij j[ks tk,axs%
ijUrq ;g vkSj fd mu lHkh in/kkfj;ksa dh] ftu ij izksUufr ds fy, fopkj fd;k tkuk gS] de ls
de rhu o”kZ dh U;wure vgZrk lsok ;k in ds HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;eksa esa fofgr lsok] tks Hkh de gks]
gksxh%
ijUrq ;g vkSj Hkh fd tgka dksbZ O;fDr iwoZxkeh ijUrqd dh vis{kkvksa ds dkj.k izksUufr fd, tkus
lEcU/kh fopkj ds fy, vik= gks tkrk gS] rks mlls dfu"B O;fDr Hkh ,slh izksUufr ds fopkj ds fy,
vik= le>k tk,xk@ le>s tk,axsA
Li"Vhdj.k%&vfUre ijUrqd ds vUrZxr dfu"B in/kkjh izksUufr ds fy, vik= ugha le>k
tk,xk@le>s tk,axs] ;fn ofj”B vik= O;fDr HkwriwoZ lSfud gS] ftls fMeksfcykbZTM vkeZM QksflZl
ijlksuy ¼fjtosZ'ku vkQ osdSUlht bu fgekpy LVsV uWku VSDuhdy lfoZlht½ :Yt] 1972 ds fu;e&3
ds mica/kksa ds vUrxZr HkrhZ fd;k x;k gks vkSj blds vUrxZr ojh;rk ykHk fn, x, gksa ;k ftls ,Dl
lfoZleSu ¼fjtosZ'ku vkQ osdSUlht bu nh fgekpy izns'k VSDuhdy lfoZlht½ :Yt] 1985 ds fu;e&3 ds
mica/kksa ds vUrxZr~ HkrhZ fd;k x;k gks vkSj buds vUrxZr~ ojh;rk ykHk fn, x, gksaA
¼2½ blh izdkj LFkk;hdj.k ds lHkh ekeyksa esa,sls in ij fu;fer fu;qfDRk@izksUufr ls iwoZ lEHkjd
¼iks"kd½ in ij dh xbZ yxkrkj rnFkZ lsok] ;fn dksbZ gks] lsokdky ds fy, x.kuk esa yh tk,xh] ;fn
rnFkZ fu;qfDr @izksUufr] mfpr p;u ds Ik'pkr~ vkSj HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;eksa ds micU/kksa ds vuqlkj dh
xbZ Fkh%
ijUrq dh xbZ mi;qZDr fufnZ"V rnFkZ lsok dks x.kuk esa ysus ds i'pkr~ tks LFkk;hdj.k gksxk] mlds
QyLo:i ikjLifjd ojh;rk vifjofrZr jgsxhA
12- ;fn foHkkxh; izksUufr lfefr fo|eku gks rks mldh lajpuk-&foHkkxh; izksUufr lfefr dh
v/;{krk fgekpy izns'k yksd lsok vk;ksx ds v/;{k ;k mlds }kjk ukefufnZ"V vk;ksx ds fdlh lnL;
}kjk dh tk,xhA
13- HkrhZ djus esa ftu ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa fgekpy izns'k yksd lsok vk;ksx ls ijke'kZ fd;k tk,xk-&
tSlk fof/k }kjk visf{kr gksA
14- lh/kh HkrhZ ds fy, vfuok;Z vis{kk-&ykxw ughaA
3374
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
15- lh/kh HkrhZ }kjk in ij fu;qfDr ds fy, p;u-&ykxw ughaA
16- vkj{k.k-&lsok esa fu;qfDr] fgekpy izns'k ljdkj }kjk le;≤ ij vuqlwfpr tkfr;ksa@
vuqlwfpr tu tkfr;ksa@vU; fiNM+s oxks± vkSj O;fDr;ksa ds vU; izoxZ ds fy, lsok esa vkj{k.k dh ckcr
tkjh fd, x, vkns'kksa ds v/khu gksxhA
17- foHkkxh; ijh{kk-&lsok ds izR;sd lnL; dks] le;≤ ij ;Fkk la'kksf/kr fgekpy izns'k
foHkkxh; ijh{kk fu;e] 1997 esa ;Fkkfofgr foHkkxh; ijh{kk ikfjr djuh gksxhA
18- f'kfFky djus dh 'kfDr-& Tkgka jkT; ljdkj dh ;g jk; gks fd ,slk djuk vko';d ;k
lehphu gS] ogka og] dkj.kksa dks fyf[kr esa vfHkfyf[kr djds vkSj fgekpy izns'k yksd lsok vk;ksx ds
ijke'kZ ls] vkns'k }kjk] bu fu;eksa] ds fdUgha micU/k ¼micU/kksa½ dks fdlh oxZ ;k O;fDr ¼O;fDr;ksa½ ds
izoxZ ;k in ¼inksa½ dh ckcr] f'kfFky dj ldsxhA
&&&&&&&&
[Authoritative
English
Text
of
Government
Notification
No
Per(SAS-I)B(2)-13/2014
dated________ as required under clause (3) of article 348 of the Constitution of India].
PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT
Secretariat Administration Services-I
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 19th June, 2017
No. Per(SAS-I)B(2)-13/2014.—In exercise of the powers conferred by proviso to article
309 of the Constitution of India, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, in consultation with the
Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission, is pleased to make the Recruitment and Promotion
Rules for the post of Research Officer Class-I (Gazetted) in the Department of Personnel
(Secretariat Administration Services) Himachal Pradesh, as per Annexure-“A” attached to this
notification namely:—
1.
Short title and commencement.—(1) These rules may be called the Himachal
Pradesh Department of Personnel (Secretariat Administration Services) Research Officer Class-I
(Gazetted) Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 2017.
(2) These rules shall come into force from the date of publication in the H.P. Rajpatra.
By order,
Sd/-
Additional Chief Secretary (SA).
3375
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
ANNEXURE-"A"
RECRUITMENT AND PROMOTION RULES FOR THE POST OF RESEARCH
OFFICER, Class-I (GAZETTED) IN THE DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL
(SECRETARIAT ADMINISTATION), H.P. SECRETARIAT
1. Name of Post.—Research Officer
2. Number of Post.— 01 (One only)
3. Classification.— Class-I(Gazetted)
4. Scale of Pay.— Pay Band for regular incumbent (s) : Rs.10300-34800/- + Rs.5000/-
Grade Pay Rs.15600-39100/- + Rs.5400/- Grade Pay (after two years of regular service without
initial pay).
5. Whether “Selection” Post or “Non- Selection” Post.—Selection.
6. Age for direct recruitment.— Not applicable.
7. Minimum
Educational
and
other
qualification
required
for
direct
recruitment(s).— (a) Essential Qualification (s) : Not applicable.
(b) Desirable Qualification (s): Not applicable.
8. Whether age and educational qualification(s) prescribed for direct recruit(s) will
apply in the case of the promote(s).— Age : Not Applicable.
Educational Qualification : As prescribed against Col. No. 11 below.
9. Period of probation, if any.—Two years subject to such further extension for a period
not exceeding one year as may be ordered by competent authority in special circumstances and
reasons to be recorded in writing.
10. Method(s) of recruitment, whether by direct recruitment or by promotion,
secondment/transfer and the percentage of posts to be filled in by various methods.—100% by
promotion.
11. In case of recruitment by promotion, secondment, transfer, grade(s) for which
promotion/secondment/ transfer is to be made.—By promotion from amongst Senior Assistants
possessing a recognised Master's Degree in Economics/Statistics/ Commerce/ Mathematics with
five years’regular service or regular combined with continuousadhoc service rendered, if any, in the
grade afteracquiring the prescribed qualification.
In all cases of promotion, the continuous adhoc service rendered in the feeder post, if any,
prior to regular appointment to the post shall be taken into account towards the length of service as
prescribed in these Rules for promotion subject to the conditions that the adhoc appointment/
promotion in the feeder category had been made after following proper acceptable process of
selection in accordance with the provisions of R&P Rules:
Provided that in all cases where a junior person becomes eligible for consideration by virtue
of his total length of service (including the service rendered on adhoc basis followed by regular
3376
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
service/ appointment) in the feeder post in view of the provisions referred to above, all persons
senior to him in the respective category/ post/ cadre shall be deemed to be eligible for consideration
and placed above the junior person in the field of consideration:
Provided that all incumbents to be considered for promotion shall possess the minimum
qualifying service of at least three years or that prescribed in the Recruitment & Promotion Rules
for the post, whichever is less:
Provided further that where a person becomes ineligible to be considered for promotion on
account of the requirements of the preceding proviso, the person(s) junior to him shall also be
deemed to be ineligible for consideration for such promotion.
EXPLANATION.—The last proviso shall not render the junior incumbents in eligible for
consideration for promotion if the senior ineligible persons happened to be Ex-servicemen recruited
under the provisions of Rule-3 of Demobilized Armed Forces Personnel (Reservation of vacancies
in Himachal State Non-Technical Services) Rules, 1972 and having been given the benefit of
seniority thereunder or recruited under the provisions of Rule- 3 of Ex-Servicemen (Reservation of
Vacancies in the Himachal Pradesh Technical Service) Rules, 1985 and having been given the
benefit of seniority thereunder.
(ii) Similarly, in all cases of confirmation, continuous adhoc service rendered on the
feeder post, if any, prior to the regular appointment against such posts shall be taken into account
towards the length of service, if the adhoc appointment/ promotion had been made after proper
selection and in accordance with the provisions of Recruitment & Promotion Rules:
Provided that inter-se-seniority as a result of confirmation after taking into the account,
adhoc service rendered as referred to above shall remain unchanged.
12. If a Departmental Promotion Committee exists, what is its composition?.—The
Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) to be presided over by the Chairman, HP Public
Service Commission or a member thereof to be nominated by him.
13. Circumstances under which the H.P.P.S.C. is to be consulted in making
recruitment.—As required under the Law.
14. Essential requirement for a direct recruitment.— Not applicable.
15. Selection for appointment to the post by direct recruitment.— Not applicable.
16. Reservation.—The appointment to the service shall be subject to orders regarding
reservation in the service for Schedule Castes/ Scheduled Tribes/ Other Backward Classes/ other
categories of persons issued by the Himachal Pradesh Government from time to time.
17. Departmental Examination.—Every member of the service shall pass a Departmental
Examination as prescribed in the Himachal Pradesh Departmental Examination Rules, 1997, as
amended from time to time.
18. Power to Relax.—Where the State Govt. is of the opinion that it is necessary or
expedient to do so, it may, by order for reasons to be recorded in writing and in consultation with
the H.P. Public Service Commission, relax any of the provision(s) of these Rules with respect to
any Class or category of person(s) or post(s).
3377
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 6th July, 2016
No. : 11-2/86(Lab)ID/2016/Bilaspur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Banarasi Dass S/O Shri Sant Ram, R/O Village Jheera, P.O. Tobba,
Tehsil Shri Naina Deviji, District Bilaspur, H.P. and (i) the Partners, M/S Universal Electric
Engineers, Dalhousie Road Pathankot, Punjab (Contractor) (ii) the Executive Engineer, Changer
Area Lift Irrigation Project Division Bassi, District Bilaspur, H.P.(Principal Employer) on the issue
of alleged termination of his services w.e.f. 01-07-2012.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of services of Shri Banarasi Dass S/O Shri Sant Ram, R/O Village
Jheera, P.O. Tobba, Tehsil Shri Naina Deviji, District Bilaspur, H.P. w.e.f. 01-07-2012 by
(i) the Partners, M/S Universal Electric Engineers, Dalhousie Road Pathankot, Punjab
(Contractor) (ii) the Executive Engineer, Changer Area Lift Irrigation Project Division
Bassi, District Bilaspur, H.P.(Principal Employer), without complying with the provisions
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back
wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to
from the above employers?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 1st July, 2016
No. : 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Bhim Singh S/O Shri Raseel Singh, R/O V.P.O. Moomta, Tehsil
Nagrota Bagwan, District Kangra, H.P. and the Secretary, Gurudwara Shri Poud Sahib, Nagrota
Bagwan, Tehsil Nagrota Bagwan, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from
services as accountant-cum-granthi w.e.f. 23-04-2015.
3378
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Bhim Singh S/O Shri Raseel Singh, R/O
V.P.O. Moomta, Tehsil Nagrota Bagwan, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 23-04-2015 by the
Secretary, Gurudwara Shri Poud Sahib, Nagrota Bagwan, Tehsil Nagrota Bagwan, District
Kangra, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is
legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 6th July, 2016.
No. : 11-2/86(Lab)ID/2016/Bilaspur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Bhupender Singh S/O Shri Deena Nath, R/O V. P. O. Tobba, Tehsil
Shri Naina Deviji, District Bilaspur, H.P. and (i) the Partners, M/S Universal Electric Engineers,
Dalhousie Road Pathankot, Punjab (Contractor) (ii) the Executive Engineer, Changer Area Lift
Irrigation Project Division Bassi, District Bilaspur, H.P.(Principal Employer) on the issue of
alleged termination of his services w.e.f. 01-07-2012.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of services of Shri Bhupender Singh S/O Shri Deena Nath, R/O
V.P.O. Tobba, Tehsil Shri Naina Deviji, District Bilaspur, H.P. w.e.f. 01-07-2012 by (i) the
3379
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
Partners, M/S Universal Electric Engineers, Dalhousie Road Pathankot, Punjab (Contractor)
(ii) the Executive Engineer, Changer Area Lift Irrigation Project Division Bassi, District
Bilaspur, H.P. (Principal Employer), without complying with the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the
above employers?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 18th July, 2016.
No.: 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2016/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between of Shri Chaman Singh S/O Shri Dharam Chand, R/O Village Kuthal, P.O.
Sach, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. and the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar
(Pangi), District Chamba, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his services during July, 1999.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Chaman Singh S/O Shri Dharam Chand, R/O
Village Kuthal, P.O. Sach, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during July, 1999 by the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar (Pangi), District Chamba, H.P., without
complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If
not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
3380
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 11th April, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2016-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Chain Lal S/O Shri Machloo Ram,
R/O Village Chanehla, P.O. Preena, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated nil- received in Labour Office, Chamba on 08.06.2011 regarding his illegal termination from
the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Bharmour, District Chamba, H.P.
The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the
industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation
proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 5.2.2013;
And whereas Shri Chain Lal S/O Shri Machloo Ram agitated the above orders of declining
of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 147/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.2.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of
the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the Hon’ble High
Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 titled as Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State
Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced
as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider
the cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision
within eight weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4.
The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Chain Lal S/O Shri Machloo Ram, R/O
Village Chanehla, P.O. Preena, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during March, 2004 by the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Bharmour, District Chamba, H.P., who had
worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7
years vide demand notice dated-nil-received on 08.06.2011, without complying the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view
of delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages,
3381
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the
above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the May, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2016-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Chain Singh S/O Shri Seth, R/O
Village Guwar, P.O. Radi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated -nil-
received in Labour Office, Chamba on 15.06.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the
services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Bharmour, District Chamba, H.P. The
Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the
industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation
proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 8 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 18.1.2014;
And whereas Shri Chain Singh S/O Shri Seth agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 796/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 7.4.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of
the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the Hon’ble High
Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State
Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced
as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within
eight weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006- IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
3382
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Chain Singh S/O Shri Seth, R/O Village
Guwar, P.O. Radi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during February, 2003 by the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Bharmour, District Chamba, H.P., who had
worked on daily wages for 76 days during year, 2001, for 52 days during year, 2002 and for
24 days during year, 2003 respectively and has raised his industrial dispute after more than
8 years vide demand notice dated-nil-received on 15.06.2012, without complying the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in
view of working period of 76 days during year, 2001, for 52 days during year, 2002 and for
24 days during year, 2003 respectively and delay of more than 8 years in raising the
industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 30th May, 2016
No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Chain Singh S/O Shri Fakiru Ram,
R/O Village and Post Office Haddal, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand
notice datednil- received in Labour Office, Dharamshala on 13.06.2011 regarding his illegal
termination from the services by the (1) Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur, Tehsil
Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (2) Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, Tehsil Nurpur,
District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra,
H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the
course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala,
District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 20 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 31.08.2013;
And whereas Shri Chain Singh S/O Shri Fakiru Ram agitated the above orders of declining
of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 722/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 04.04.2016 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to
make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part
of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
3383
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ
petition and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The
writ petition is disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending
applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Chain Singh S/O Shri Fakiru Ram, R/O
Village and Post Office Haddal, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during August, 1990
by (1) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur, Tehsil Nurpur, District
Kangra, H.P. (2) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, Tehsil Nurpur,
District Kangra, H.P., who had worked as daily wages worker and has raised his industrial
dispute after more than 20 years vide demand notice dated-nilreceived on 13.06.2011,
without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and
justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 20 years in raising the industrial
dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 11th April, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2016-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Chamno S/O Shri Bhim Sain, R/O
Village Chanehla, P.O. Preena, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated
30.05.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. Division, Bharmour, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same
could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report
under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 5.2.2013;
And whereas Shri Chamno S/O Shri Bhim Sain agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
3384
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 151/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.2.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of
the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the Hon’ble High
Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State
Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced
as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider
the cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision
within eight weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Chamno S/O Shri Bhim Sain, R/O Village
Chanehla, P.O. Preena, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during March, 2004 by the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Bharmour, District Chamba, H.P., who had
worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7
years vide demand notice dated 30.05.2011, without complying the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more
than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-17100, the 1st July, 2016
No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Dev Raj S/O Shri Chatro Ram, R/O
Village and Post Office Danni, Teshil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated-nilreceived in Labour Office, Dharamshala on 13.06.2011 regarding his illegal termination
from the services by (1) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur, Tehsil Nurpur,
District Kangra, H.P. (2) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, Tehsil Nurpur,
District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra,
H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the
course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
3385
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala,
District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
after about 21 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated
18.09.2013;
And whereas Shri Dev Raj S/O Shri Chatro Ram agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 542/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 29.03.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case
of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the Hon’ble
High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh
State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is
reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within
eight weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4.
The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Dev Raj S/O Shri Chatro Ram, R/O
Village and Post Office Danni, Teshil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during June, 1990 by
(1) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra,
H.P. (2) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, Tehsil Nurpur, District
Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after
about 21 years vide demand notice dated-nil-received on 13.06.2011, without complying the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and
justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of after about 21 years in raising the industrial
dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 11th April, 2016
3386
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2016-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Dev Raj S/O Shri Jawahar, R/O
Village and Post Office Preena, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated
30.05.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. Division, Bharmour, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same
could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report
under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 24.1.2013;
And whereas Shri Dev Raj S/O Shri Jawahar agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 139/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.2.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of
the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the Hon’ble High
Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State
Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced
as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within
eight weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4.
The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Dev Raj S/O Shri Jawahar, R/O Village
and Post Office Preena, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during March, 2004 by the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Bharmour, District Chamba, H.P., who had
worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7
years vide demand notice dated 30.05.2011, without complying the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more
than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
3387
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 5th July, 2016
No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Fakardeen S/O Shri Kadar Deen, R/O
Village Khajjan Basa, P.O. Sadwan, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand
notice datednil- received in Labour Office, Dharamshala on 13.06.2011 regarding his illegal
termination from the services by (1) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur, Tehsil
Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (2) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, Tehsil
Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District
Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during
the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala,
District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that as per reply filed by the above employers worker has not
worked with the employers No. (1) & (2) and had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than
20 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 18.09.2013;
And whereas Shri Fakardeen S/O Shri Kadar Deen agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 815/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 7.4.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of
the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the Hon’ble High
Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State
Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced
as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within
eight weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4.
The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any."
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Fakardeen S/O Shri Kadar Deen, R/O
Village Khajjan Basa, P.O. Sadwan, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990
by (1) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur, Tehsil Nurpur, District
Kangra, H.P. (2) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, Tehsil Nurpur,
District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute
after more than 20 years vide demand notice dated-nil-received on 13.06.2011, without
complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman,
3388
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 20 years in raising the
industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 11th April, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2016-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Garbo S/O Shri Prabhu Ram, R/O
Village Chanehla, P.O. Preena, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated
30.05.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. Division, Bharmour, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same
could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report
under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 5.2.2013;
And whereas Shri Garbo S/O Shri Prabhu Ram agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 156/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 23.2.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of
the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the Hon’ble High
Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State
Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced
as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within
eight weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
3389
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Garbo S/O Shri Prabhu Ram, R/O Village
Chanehla, P.O. Preena, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during March, 2004 by the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Bharmour, District Chamba, H.P., who had
worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7
years vide demand notice dated 30.05.2011, without complying the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more
than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 30th May, 2016
No. 11-1/18(Lab)ID/2016-Sunder Nagar.—Whereas Shri Bhag Singh S/O Shri Goverdhan
Ram, R/O Village Banehach, Post Office Balag, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. had
raised a demand notice dated 07.09.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the
Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour
Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial
dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings,
where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour
Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Sunder
Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 8 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order
dated 28.05.2013;
And whereas Shri Bhag Singh S/O Shri Goverdhan Ram agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 738/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 6.4.2016 and directed the respondents to consider
the cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the
Hon’ble High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal
Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment
is reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within
eight weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
3390
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Bhag Singh S/O Shri Goverdhan Ram,
R/O Village Banehach, Post Office Balag, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. during
December, 2002 by the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar,
District Mandi, H.P., who had worked on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute
after more than 8 years vide demand notice dated 07.09.2011, without complying the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view
of delay of more than 8 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the
above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 6th July, 2016.
No.: 11-2/86(Lab)ID/2016/Bilaspur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Gurbhajan Singh S/O Shri Ram Asra, R/O Village Baherda, P.O. Bassi,
Tehsil Shri Naina Deviji, District Bilaspur, H.P. and (i) the Partners, M/S Universal Electric
Engineers, Dalhousie Road Pathankot, Punjab (Contractor) and (ii) the Executive Engineer,
Changer Area Lift Irrigation Project Division Bassi, District Bilaspur, H.P. (Principal Employer) on
the issue of alleged termination of his services w.e.f. 01-07-2012.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
3391
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
“Whether termination of services of Shri Gurbhajan Singh S/O Shri Ram Asra, R/O Village
Baherda, P.O. Bassi, Tehsil Shri Naina Deviji, District Bilaspur, H.P. w.e.f. 01-07-2012 by
(i) the Partners, M/S Universal Electric Engineers, Dalhousie Road Pathankot, Punjab
(Contractor) and (ii) the Executive Engineer, Changer Area Lift Irrigation Project Division
Bassi, District Bilaspur, H.P.(Principal Employer), without complying with the provisions
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back
wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to
from the above employers?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_______
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 18th July, 2016.
No.: 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2016/Una.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer,
Una has submitted a report as provided under Section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri Man Singh S/O Shri Hari Mitter
Singh, R/O V.P.O. Ambota, Tehsil Amb, District Una, H.P. and the Executive Engineer, Flood
Protection Division, I. &P.H. Department, Gagret, District Una, H.P. as per demand notice dated
25-05-2015 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding termination of his services.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub- section-5
of Section-12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above
ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services w.e.f. 26-06-2004
before the above employer after delay of more than 11 years and has worked only for 153 and 121
days during years 2003 and 2004 respectively.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble
High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for
adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal
Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue:-
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Man Singh S/O Shri Hari Mitter Singh,
R/O V.P.O. Ambota, Tehsil Amb, District Una, H.P. w.e.f. 26-06-2004 by the Executive
Engineer, Flood Protection Division, I.&P.H. Department, Gagret, District Una, H.P., who
3392
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
has worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his industrial dispute vide demand
notice dated 25-05-2015 after more than 11 years , allegedly without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view
of working period of 153 and 121 days during years 2003 and 2004 and delay of more than
11 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management? ”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 6th July, 2016
No.: 11-2/86(Lab)ID/2016/Bilaspur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Harjinder Singh S/O Shri Bhola Nath, R/O V.P.O. Tarso, Tehsil Shri
Naina Deviji, District Bilaspur, H.P. and (i) the Partners, M/S Universal Electric Engineers,
Dalhousie Road Pathankot, Punjab (Contractor) and (ii) the Executive Engineer, Changer Area Lift
Irrigation Project Division Bassi, District Bilaspur, H.P.(Principal Employer) on the issue of
alleged termination of his services w.e.f. 01-07-2012.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of services of Shri Harjinder Singh S/O Shri Bhola Nath, R/O V.P.O.
Tarso, Tehsil Shri Naina Deviji, District Bilaspur, H.P. w.e.f. 01-07-2012 by (i) the Partners,
M/S Universal Electric Engineers, Dalhousie Road Pathankot, Punjab (Contractor) and (ii)
the Executive Engineer, Changer Area Lift Irrigation Project Division Bassi, District
Bilaspur, H.P. (Principal Employer), without complying with the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the
above employers?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
3393
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 6th July, 2016.
No. : 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
exists between Shri Jagdish Singh, S/O Shri Pushkar Singh, R/O Village Kanda, P.O. Kanda, Tehsil
Jakholi, District Rudra Prayag, Uttrakhand and Managing Director, M/S Yongman Synthesis
Private Limited, V.P.O. Gondpur Jai Chand, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. on the issue of
alleged termination of his services during January, 2014.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Jagdish Singh, S/O Shri Pushkar Singh, R/O
Village Kanda, P.O. Kanda, Tehsil Jakholi, District Rudra Prayag, Uttrakhand during
January, 2014 by the Managing Director, M/S Yongman Synthesis Private Limited, V.P.O.
Gondpur Jai Chand, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P., without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled
to from the above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
x`g foHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f”keyk] 1 tqykbZ] 2017
la[;k% x`g&lh ¼,½ 3&4@2016-&fgekpy izns”k ds jkT;iky] fgekpy izns”k jkT; esa izkbosV
O;olkf;;ksa ds #i eas dk;Z djus okys U;k;kyf;d nLrkost rFkk vaxqyh Nki ijh{kdksa dh lsok fouh;fer
djus ds fy, fuEufyf[kr fu;e cukrs gaS] vFkkZr~%&
1- Lkaf{kIr uke] izkjEHk vkSj ykxw gksuk-&¼1½ bu fu;eksa dk laf{kIr uke fgekpy izns”k
U;k;kyf;d nLrkost vkSj vaxqyh Nki ijh{kd ¼izkbosV O;olk;h½ fofu;ked fu;e] 2017 gSA
(2) ;s fu;e jkti=] fgekpy izns”k esa buds izdk”ku dh rkjh[k ls izo`Rr gksaxsA
3394
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
(3) ;s fu;e fgekpy izns”k jkT; esa izkbZosV O;olk;h ds #i esa dk;Z djus okys U;k;kyf;d
nLrkost vkjS vxaqyh Nki ijh{kdksa dks ykxw gksaxs A
2- ifjHkk’kk,a-&bu fu;eksa esa] tc rd fd lanHkZ ls vU;Fkk visf{kr u gks]&
¼d½ ^^izkf/kdj.k** ls] fgekpy izns”k U;k;kyf;d nLrkost vkSj vaxqyh Nki ijh{kd fofu;ked
izkf/kdj.k vfHkizsr gS(
¼[k½ ^^fo”ks’kK cksMZ** ls] O;olk;jr rhu U;k;kyf;d nLrkost ijh{kdksa dk iSuy ;k O;olk;jr
rhu vaxqyh Nki ijh{kdksa dk iSuy vfHkizsr gS(
¼x½ ^^v/;{k** ls] izkf/kdj.k dk v/;{k vfHkizsr gS(
¼?k½ ^^vaxqyh Nki C;wjksa ** ls] jkT; vxaqyh Nki C;wjks ;k dsUnzh; Nki C;wjks vfHkizsr gS(
¼M+½ ^^U;k;kyf;d iz;ksx”kkyk** ls] dsfUnz; U;k;kyf;d iz;ksx”kkyk ;k jkT; U;k;kyf;d
iz;ksx”kkyk ;k {ks=h; U;k;kyf;d iz;ksx”kkyk vfHkizsr gS(
¼p½ ^^lnL;** ls] izkf/kdj.k dk lnL; vfHkizsr gSA
¼N½ ^^O;olk;jr vaxqyh Nki ijh{kd** ls] dksbZ vaxqyh Nki ijh{kd vfHkizsr gS tks de ls de
nl o’kZ ls ,slk O;olk; dj jgk gS vkSj dsoy fgekpy izns”k esa gh jftLVªhd`r gS(
¼t½ ^^O;olk;jr U;k;kyf;d nLrkost ijh{kd** ls] dksbZ izkbZosV nLrkost fo”ks’kK vfHkizsr gS tks
de ls de nl o’kZ ls ,slk O;olk; dj jgk gS vkSj dsoy fgekpy izns”k esa gh jftLVªhd`r
gS( vkSj
¼>½ ^^jftLVªhdj.k** l]s izkf/kdj.k esa jftLVªhd`r vfHkizsr gSA
3- jftLVªhdj.k ds fy, vgZrk,a vkSj vis{kk,a-&jftLVªhdj.k djokus dk bPNqd vkosnd]&
¼d½ vPNs uSfrd pfj=] Js’B lR;fu’Bk vkSj vPNh [;kfr rFkk vPNk uhfrijd rFkk O;olkf;d
izfr’Bk okyk O;fDr gksuk pkfg,(
¼[k½ ekU;rk izkIr fo'ofo|ky;@laLFkk ls foKku ;k U;k;kyf;d foKku esa de ls de mikf/k
/kkjd ;k ekU;rk izkIr fo”ofo|ky;@laLFkk ls U;k;kyf;d foKku esa fMIyksek gksuk pkfg,
;k dsfUnz; ;k jkT; vFkok {ks=h; U;k;kyf;d iz;ksx”kkyk esa chl o’kZ dk fu;fer lsok dk
vuqHko gksuk pkfg, ;k vf/kekur% U;k;ky; foKku ;k lqlxa r {ks= es a ih-,p-Mh- mikf/k
/kkjd gks(
¼x½ ekU;rk izkIr fo”ofo|ky;@laLFkk ls foKku ;k U;k;kyf;d foKku esa de ls de mikf/k
/kkjd ;k ekU;rk izkIr fo’ofo|ky;@laLFkk ls U;k;kyf;d foKku esa fMIyksek gksuk pkfg,
;k mldk dsUnzh;@jkT; vaxqyh Nki C;wjks esa vaxqyh Nki ijh{k.k esa fu;fer lsok ds #i esa
chl o’kZ dk vuqHko gksuk pkfg,(
¼?k½ us U;k;kyf;d foKku iz;ksx”kkyk ;k O;olk;jr U;k;kyf;d nLrkost ijh{kd ds v/khu de
ls de nks o’kZ dh vof/k dk iw.kZdkfyd izf”k{k.k izkIr fd;k gksuk pkfg,(
¼³½ us vaxqyh Nki C;wjks ;k O;olk;jr vaxwyh Nki ijh{kd ds v/khu de ls de nks o’kZ dh
vof/k dk iw.kZdkfyd izf”k{k.k izkIr fd;k gksuk pkfg,(
3395
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
¼p½ us fdlh iz[;kr tujy esa fo’k; ij de ls de ,d “kks/k i= izdkf'kr fd;k gksuk pkfg,(
¼N½ U;k;kyf;d nLrkost ijh{k.k ds O;olk; esa lfdz; #i ls yxk gksuk pkfg,(
¼t½ vaxqyh Nki ijh{k.k ds O;olk; esa lfdz; #i ls yxk gksuk pkfg,(
¼>½ jftLVªhdj.k ds fy, viuh vgZrk lR;kfir djus gsrw rhu U;k;kyf;d nLrkost ijh{kdksa ds
uke vkSj irs ds lanHkZ esa izLrqr djus gksaxs( vkSj
¼.k½ jftLVªhdj.k ds fy, viuh vgZrk lR;kfir djus gsrw rhu vaxqyh Nki fo”ks’kKksa ds uke vkSj
irs ds lanHkZ esa izLrqr djus gksaxsA
4- fgekpy izns”k U;k;kyf;d nLrkost vkSj vaxqyh Nki ijh{kd fofu;ked izkf/kdj.k dk
xBu-&(1) jkT; ljdkj fuEufyf[kr lnL;ksa ls lekfo"V ^fgekpy izns”k U;k;kyf;d nLrkost vkSj vaxqyh
Nki ijh{kd fofu;ked izkf/kdj.k* ds uke ls Kkr ,d fudk; dk xBu djsxh%&
(i) funs”kd] U;k;kyf;d foKku] fgekpy izns'k
v/;{k (
(ii) funs”kd] vfHk;kstu] fgekpy izns”k
lnL; (
(iii) fdlh ekU;rk izkIr fo”ofo|ky; ds
lnL; (
U;k;kyf;d foKku foHkkx dk vkpk;Z
(iv) [;kfr izkIr nks U;k;kyf;d oSKkfud
lnL; ( vkSj
¼dsUnzh; ;k jkT; ;k {ks=h;
U;k;kyf;d iz;ksx”kkyk½
(v) lgk;d funs”kd] ¼nLrkost½] jkT; ;k
lnL;&lfpoA
{ks=h; U;k;kyf;d iz;ksx”kkyk ;k
lgk;d funs”kd ¼vaxqyh Nki C;wjks½
¼2½ funs”kd] U;k;kyf;d foKku] fgekpy izns”k izkf/kdj.k ds lnL; ds #i esa ukekadu ds fy,
,d vkpk;Z dk uke fu;r djus ds fy, fo”ofo|ky; ds izkf/kdkfj;ksa ls ijke”kZ djsxkA ukefufnZ’V
lnL; dsk] ljdkj ds fu;eksa ds v/khu ;Fkk vuqKs; ;k=k vkSj nSfud HkRrs rFkk ekuns;] ;fn dksbZ gks]
lanRr fd;k tk ldsxkA
¼3½ funs”kd] U;k;kyf;d foKku] fgekpy izns”k] izkf/kdj.k ds lnL; ds #i esa ,d U;k;kyf;d
oSKkfud dk uke fufer djus ds fy, funs”kd ,oa eq[; U;k;kyf;d oSKkfud] funs”kky;] U;k;kyf;d
lsok,a] x`g ea=ky;] Hkkjr ljdkj ls ijke”kZ djsxkA ukefufnZ’V lnL; dks] ljdkj ds fu;eksa ds v/khu
;Fkk vuqKs; ;k=k vkSj nSfud HkRrs rFkk ekuns;] ;fn dksbZ gks] lanRr fd;k tk ldsxkA
(4) izkf/kdj.k izkbZosV iz”uxr nLrkost ijh{kdksa vkSj gLrys[k fo”ks’kKksa rFkk vaxqyh Nki ijh{kdksa
ls mudk jftLVªhdj.k djus ds fy, vkosnu vkeaf=r djus gsrw vkosnu dk iz#i rS;kj vkSj vf/klwfpr
djsxkA vkosnu ds iz#i esa vU; lqpuk ds vfrfjDr] jftLVªhdj.k ds fy, visf{kr nLrkost vkSj
jftLVªhdj.k Qhl ds C;kSjs varfoZ’V gksaxsA
(5) izkf/kdj.k] vkosndksas dh vgZrk,a] izR;; i= vkSj fo”oluh;rk dh tkap djds mudh izk=rk
dk U;k;fu.kZ;u djus ds fy,] izR;sd ekl ds izFke lIrkg esa cSBd djsxk vkSj lek/kku gksa tkus ij
izkf/kdj.k 5]000@& #i;s (ikaWp gtkj) dh jftLVªhdj.k dh Qhl izHkkfjr djsxk rFkk rRi'pkr~ ikWap o’kZ
3396
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
rd dh fof/kekU;rk okyk jftLVªhdj.k izek.k i= tkjh fd;k tk ldsxkA jftLVªhdj.k ds uohdj.k ds
fy, vkosnd 2]500@& #i;s (iPphl lkS) dh lank; djsxk vkSj viuk vkosnu izkf/kdj.k dks izLrqr djsxk
rFkk lek/kku gks tkus ds Ik”pkr~ izkf/kdj.k vkSj ikWap o’kZ ds fy, jftLVªhdj.k izek.k i= dk uohdj.k dj
ldsxkA
(6) izkf/kdj.k] vkosnd dks lquokbZ dk ;qfDr;qDr volj nsus ds Ik”pkr fof/kekU; vk/kkjksa ij]
vkosnu ukeUtwj djus dk vf/kdkj gksxkA
(7) izkf/kdj.k jftLVªhd`r izkbZosV U;k;kyf;d iz”uxr nLrkost ijh{kdksa vkSj gLrys[k fo”ks’kKksa
rFkk vxaqyh Nki ijh{kdksa dh lwph vuqjf{kr djsxk rFkk le;≤ ij bls jkT; ljdkj vkSj
U;k;kyf;d foKku funs”kky;] f”keyk fgYl] tqUxk] fgekpy izns”k dh oSclkbZV ij viyksM djsxk rFkk
mls v|ru djsxkA
5- jftLVªhdj.k ds lkekU; micU/k %
(d) izkf/kdj.k dks jftLVªhdj.k vLohdkj djus dk vf/kdkj gksxk(
([k) jftLVªhdj.k ikWap o’kZ dh vof/k ds fy, fof/kekU; gksxk vkSj mldk uohdj.k djokuk
vfuok;Z gksxk(
(x) lE;d~ #i ls jftLVªhd`r U;k;kyf;d nLrkost ijh{kdksa@a gLrys[k fo”ks’kKksa vkSj vaxqyh
Nki ijh{kdks dh lqph vuqjf{kr dh tk,xh rFkk mls dkfydr% jkT; ljdkj vkSj jkT;
U;k;kyf;d iz;ksx”kkyk dh oSclkbV ij v|ru fd;k tk,xk(
(?k) izR;sd jftLVªhd`r U;k;kyf;d nLrkost ijh{kd vkSj gLrys[k fo”ks’kK vkSj vaxqyh Nki
ijh{kdksa dh fjiksVZ esa izkf/kdj.k }kjk tkjh fof/kekU; jftLVªhdj.k la[;k vo”; gksuh pkfg,(
(M+) izkf/kdj.k dks vkosnd@nks"kh dks lquokbZ ds Ik”pkr~ jftLVªhd`r U;k;kyf;d nLrkost ijh{kd
vkSj gLrys[k fo”ks’kK rFkk vaxqyh Nki ijh{kd ds fo#} vuq”kklukRed dk;Zokgh djus dh
“kfDr gksxh ;fn og uSfrd ;k vkpj.k ;k l{kerk ds O;olkf;d fu;eksa dk mYya?ku
djrk@ djrh gS ;k ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk mlds fo#) vo{ksi ikfjr fd, x, gSa(
vkSj
(p) izkf/kdj.k dks fdUgha vuq”kklfud dk;Zokfg;ksa esa] fuEufyf[kr esa ls fdlh ,d “kkfLr dks]
vf/kjksfir djus dh “kfDr gksxh %&
(i)
fyf[kr f/kXn.M( ;k
(ii) fdlh fofufnZ’V le; vof/k ds fy, jftLVªhdj.k dk fuyEcu( ;k
(iii) LFkk;h #i lsa jftLVªhdj.k jnn~ djuk( ;k
(iv) izkf/kdj.k] fo”ks’kKksa ds ijLij fojks/kh ijke”kksZa dh n”kk esa] vius v/kh{k.kk/khu rhu
fo”ks’kKksa ds cksMZ dk xBu djsxk ftldh fjiksVZ eqdnn~ek yM+us okys i{kdkjksa ij
vko)dj gksxhA ,sls fo”ks’kK cksMZ ds lnL;ksa dks ,sls ekeyksa ds ijh{k.k ds fy,
uke&ek= Qhl lanRr dh tk,xh( ;k
(v)
bu fu;eksa ds fuoZpu ds lEcU/k esa ;fn dksbZ iz”u mRiUu gksrk gS rks jkT;
ljdkj mldk fofu”p; djsxhA
3397
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
6- uSfrd vkSj vkpj.k dh lafgrk-&uSfrd vkSj vkpj.k dh lafgrk ds fl)kUr fuEu izdkj ls
gkasxs%&
(d) leLr nLrkost@vaxqyh Nki ijh{kd dh leL;kvksa@(ds iz”uksa) ds eqY;kdau esa foKku
vkSj rdZ ds fl)kUr ykxw gkasxs(
([k) lrr~ v/;;u vkSj vuqla/kku }kjk {ks= esa uohure vkfo"dkjksa ls voxr j[kuk(
(x) eqofDdy ls izkIr lqpuk dks xksiuh; j[kuk( vkSj fdlh O;fDr dks okLrfod eqofDdy ds
fgrksa ds izfrdyw le#i lsok,a iznku djus ls bUdkj djuk(
(?k) nLrkost] vaxqyh Nki esa oLrqxr lk{; ds vuqlkj vkSj loZFkk rF;ksa }kjk U;k;ksfpr foLrkj
rd ijke”kZ ;k fu.kZ; nsuk(
(M)+ U;k;ky; esa ;k blds ckgj iw.kZr;% fu’i{k jhfr esa O;ogkj djuk vkSj ,slk dksbZ dk;Z u
djuk tks ekeys esa fdlh i{kikr ;k fgr dks nf”kZr djrk gks(
(Pk) fdlh ijh{k.k vkSj mlds leqfpr fuoZpu ds fu’d’kZ dh fjiksVZ djuk(
(N) ekeys dh egRrrk dks /;ku esa yk, fcuk leLr ekeyksa esa ;ksX;rkuqlkj laHko lsok,a iznku
djuk(
(t) iznku dh xbZ lsokvkasa ds fy, ikjLifjd lafonk djkj ds vuqlkj lsok& izHkkj ysukA ekeys
es leLr rF;ksa ij fopkj djds] mfpr vkSj lkE;kiw.kZ ikfjJfed ysuk(
(>) vkdfLed Qhl vk/kkj ij dksbZ dk;Z ugha fd;k tk,xk(
(´) leLr fyf[kr ;k ekSf[kd fjiksVkasZ vkSj ijhlk{; esa rduhdh #i ls lgh foojf.k;kWa rS;kj
djuk(
(V) mPp uSfrd] “kSf{kd vkSj rduhdh ekudksa lfgr la;qDr vkSfpR; dk lrr~ Hkko j[kukA
vkns”k }kjk]
gLrk{kfjr@&
iz/kku lfpo ¼x`g½A
&&&&&&&&
HOME DEPARTMENT
Shimla, the 1st July, 2017
No. Home-C(A) 3-4/2016.—The Governor of Himachal Pradesh is pleased to make the
following rules to regulate the service of Forensic Document and Finger Print Examiners working
in the field as private practitioners in the State of Himachal Pradesh.
1. Short title, commencement and application.—(1) These rules may be called the
Himachal Pradesh Forensic Document and Finger Print Examiner (Private Practitioners)
Regulatory Rules, 2017.
3398
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
(2) They shall come into force from the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
(3) They shall apply to Forensic Document and Finger Print Examiners working as private
practitioners in the State of Himachal Pradesh.
2. Definitions.—In these rules unless the context otherwise requires,-
(a) ‘Authority’ means the Himachal Pradesh Forensic Document and Finger Print
Examiners Regulatory Authority;
(b) ‘Board of Experts’ means a panel of three practicing Forensic Document Examiners or
a panel of three practicing Finger Print Examiners;
(c) ‘Chairperson’ means the Chairperson of the Authority;
(d) ‘Finger Print Bureau’ means State Finger Print Bureau or Central Finger Print Bureau;
(e) ‘Forensic Science Laboratory’ means Central Forensic Laboratory or State Forensic
Science Laboratory or Regional Forensic Science Laboratory;
(f) ‘Member’ means a Member of the Authority;
(g) ‘practicing Finger Print Examiner’ means any private Finger Print Examiner having at
least ten years practice as such and registered only in Himachal Pradesh;
(h) ‘practicing Forensic Document Examiner’ means any private document expert having
at least ten years of practice as such and registered only in Himachal Pradesh; and
(i) ‘registration’ means registered with the Authority.
3. Qualifications and requirements for registration.—The applicant seeking
registration must,-
(a) be a person of good moral character, high integrity and good repute and must
possess high ethical and professional standing;
(b) possess at least a science degree or degree in Forensic Science preferably Ph. D in
Forensics or relevant field from recognized university/institute or diploma in Forensic
Science from a recognized university/institute or have experience of 20 years regular
service in document examination in Central or State or Regional Forensic Science
Laboratory;
(c) possess at least a science degree or degree in Forensic Science preferably Ph. D in
Forensics or relevant field from recognized university/institute or diploma in Forensic
Science from a recognized university/institute or having 20 years experience as regular
service in finger print examination in Central or State Finger Print Bureau;
(d) have undergone full time training of at least two years duration in Forensic Science
Laboratory or under practicing Forensic Document examiner;
(e) have undergone full time training of at least two years duration in Finger Print Bureau
or under practicing finger print examiner;
3399
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
(f) have published at least one research paper on the subject in a renowned journal;
(g) be actively engaged in practice of Forensic Document Examination;
(h) be actively engaged in practice of Finger Print Examination;
(i) submit as references the names and addresses of three Forensic Document Examiners
attesting to his/her qualification for registration; and
(j) submit as references the names and addresses of three Finger Print Examiners attesting
to his/her qualification for registration.
4. Constitution of Himachal Pradesh Forensic Document and Finger Print
Examiner Regulatory Authority.—(1) The State Government shall constitute a body to be known
as “the Himachal Pradesh Forensic Document and Finger Print Examiner Regulatory Authority”
comprising of the following members:—
(i) Director, Forensic Science , H.P.
Chairman ;
(ii) Director , Prosecution, H.P.
Member ;
(iii) Professor, Deptt. of Forensic Science
Member ;
of a recognized University.
(iv) Two Forensic Scientists of Eminence (Central or
Member ; and
State or Regional Forensic Science Laboratory)
(v) Assistant Director, (Document), State or Regional
Member-Secretary.
Forensic Science Laboratory or Assistant Director
(Finger Print Bureau)
2. The Director, Forensic Science, Himachal Pradesh shall consult the University
Authorities to determine name of one professor for nominating as Member of the Authority. The
nominated Member may be paid Travelling and Daily Allowances and Honorarium, if any, as
admissible under the Government rules.
3. The Director, Forensic Science, Himachal Pradesh shall consult the Director-cum-
Chief Forensic Scientist, Directorate of Forensic Services, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government
of India to determine name of one Forensic Scientist as Member of the Authority. The nominated
member may be paid Travelling and Daily Allowance and Honorarium, if any, as admissible under
the Government rules.
4. The Authority shall devise and notify application form for inviting applications from
private Forensic Questioned Document Examiners and Handwriting Experts and Finger Print
Examiners for their registration. The application form shall contain the details of documents
required for registration and the registration fee in addition to other information.
5. The Authority shall hold its meeting in the first week of every month to adjudge the
eligibility of the applicants by checking their qualifications, credentials and credibility, and after
satisfaction, the Authority shall charge Rs. 5,000/- registration fee and thereafter registration
certificate may be issued having validity of five years. For renewal of registration, the applicant
3400
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
shall pay Rs. 2,500/- and submit his application to the Authority, and after satisfaction, the
Authority may renew registration certificate for another five years.
6. The Authority shall have the right to reject the application on the valid grounds after
affording the opportunity of being heard to the applicant.
7. The Authority shall maintain a list of registered Private Forensic Questioned
Document Examiners and Handwriting Experts and Finger Print Examiners and upload and update,
from time to time, on the official web-site of State Government and of the Directorate of Forensic
Science, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla Hills, Junga,
5. General provisions of Registration:
(a) the right to deny registration shall be reserved with the Authority;
(b) the registration shall be valid for a period of five years and its renewal shall be
mandatory;
(c) the list of duly registered Forensic Document Examiners/ Handwriting Experts and
Finger Print Examiners shall be maintained and updated periodically on official
website of the State Government and of the State Forensic Science Laboratory;
(d) the report of every registered Forensic Document Examiner and Handwriting Expert
and Finger Print Examiner must bear his/her valid registration number issued by the
Authority.
(e) the Authority, after hearing the applicant/delinquent shall have the power to take
disciplinary action against the registered Forensic Document Examiner and
Handwriting Expert and Finger Print Examiner if he/she violates ethical or
professional rules of conduct or competency or strictures have been passed against
him/her by the Hon’ble High Court.
(f) In any disciplinary proceeding, the Authority shall have the power to impose any of the
following penalties:—
(i) written reprimand; or
(ii) suspension of registration for a specific period of time; or
(iii) cancellation of registration permanently; or
(iv) the Authority in the event of conflicting opinions of experts shall appoint a board
of three experts under its supervision whose report would be binding on the
contesting parties. The members of such board of experts shall be paid a nominal
fee for the examination of such case; or
(v) if any, question arises as to the interpretation of these rules, the State Government
shall decide the same.
6. Code of Ethics and Conduct.— The principles of code of Ethics and Conduct shall be
as follows:—
3401
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
(a) to apply the principles of science and logic in the evaluation of all document/finger
print examination problems;
(b) to keep informed on latest developments in the field by constant study and research;
(c) to keep information received from a client as confidential; and to refuse to perform
similar services for any person whose interests are opposed to those of the original
client;
(d) to give an opinion or conclusion strictly in accordance with the physical evidence in
the document, finger print and to the extent justified by the facts;
(e) to behave in and out of court in an absolutely impartial manner and to do nothing that
would show bias or any interest in the case;
(f) to report the findings of an examination and their proper interpretation;
(g) to give the best possible services in all cases, irrespective of the importance of the
matter;
(h) to charge for services, in accordance with a mutually agreed contract for services
rendered. Remuneration shall be fair and equitable considering all the elements in the
case;
(i) no engagement shall be undertaken on a contingent basis;
(j)
to make technically correct statements in all written or oral reports and testimony; and
(k) to maintain a constant spirit of fairness combined with high ethical, education and
technical standards.
By order,
Sd/-
Principal Secretary (Home).
__________
fuokZpu foHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f”keyk&171009] 4 tqykÃ] 2017
Lka[;k% 3&1@2017&bZ-,y-,u-&II-&&Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx dh vf/klwpuk la[;k 480@2017&ch-
Ã- o 480@2017¼1½ ch-Ã- n®u®a] fnukad 4 tqykÃ] 2017 rnkuqlkj vk’kk<+ 13] 1939 ¼”kd~½ tks fd Hkkjr ds
mijk’Vªifr in ds fy, fuokZpu rFkk fuokZpu ds fy, fu;qDr fjVfuZax vkWfQlj ¼egklfpo] jkT; lHkk½
}kjk tkjh fuokZpu dh vfËklwpuk o yksd lwpuk fnukad 4 tqykÃ] 2017 ls lEcfU/kr gS] dks vaxzsth
:ikUrj lfgr tulk/kkj.k dh lwpuk gsrq izdkf”kr fd;k tkrk gSA
vkns”k ls
gLrk{kfjr@&
Ekq[; fuokZpu vf/kdkjh]
fgekpy izns”kA
3402
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx
fuokZpu lnu] v”kksd jksM+] ubZ fnYyh&110001
vf/klwpuk
fnukad % 4 tqykÃ] 2017
vk’kk<+ 13] 1939 ¼”kd~½
la[;k% 480@2017&ch-bZ%&;r%] eks0 gkfen valkjh] Hkkjr ds mijk’Vªifr dh inkof/k] lafo/kku ds
vuqPNsn 67 dh “krksZa ij] 10 vxLr] 2017 dks lekIr gks jgh gS( vkSj
;r% in/kkfjr mijk’Vªifr dh inkof/k lekIr gksus rFkk mudk dk;Zdky lekIr gksus ls iwoZ] bl
izdkj mRiUu gqbZ fjfDr dks Hkjus ds iz;kstu ls] lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 68 ds [k.M ¼1½ dh “krksZa ij fuokZpu
djk;k tkuk gS( vkSj
;Rk% jk’Vªirh; vkSj mijk’Vªirh; fuokZpu vf/kfu;e] 1952 ¼1952 dk 31½ dh /kkjk 4 dh mi/kkjk
¼3½ ds v/khu Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx }kjk Hkkjr ds mijk’Vªifr ds in dks Hkjus ds fy, fuokZpu gsrq rkjh[k
bl rjg fu;r dh tkuh visf{kr gS fd fuokZpu ,sls le; rd iw.kZ gks tk, vkSj fuokZfpr mijk’Vªifr
viuk in 11 vxLr] 2017 dks xzg.k djus esa leFkZ gks ldas(
vr% vc] Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx ,rn}kjk%&&
¼v½ lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 66 esa fufnZ’V fuokZpd eaMy ls ;g vis{kk djrk gS fd os lafo/kku ds
izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj] jk’Vªirh; vkSj mijk’Vªirh; fuokZpu vf/kfu;e] 1952 ¼1952 dk 31½
vkSj rn/khu cuk, x, fu;eksa vkSj muds rgr t+kjh fd, x, vkns”kksa ds micU/kksa ds vuqlkj]
orZeku mijk’Vªifr dh vof/k [kRe gksus ls iwoZ Hkkjr ds mijk’Vªifr ds in dks Hkjus ds fy,
,d O;fDr fuokZfpr dj nsa( vkSj
¼vk½ mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 4 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ ds vuqlj.k esa fuEufyf[kr fu/kkZfjr djrk gS %
¼d½ uke&funsaZ”ku dh vfUre rkjh[k
% 18 tqykbZ] 2017 ¼eaxyokj½
¼[k½ uke&funsZa”ku dh laoh{kk dh rkjh[k
% 19 tqykbZ] 2017 ¼cq/kokj½
¼x½ vH;fFkZrk,a okil ysus dh vfUre rkjh[k
% 21 tqykbZ] 2017 ¼'kqØokj½
¼?k½ og rkjh[k ftldks] ;fn vko”;d gqvk]
% 05 vxLr] 2017 ¼”kfuokj½
rks ernku gksxk
vkns'k ls]
vkj- ds- JhokLro]
ofj’B iz/kku lfpoA
&&&&&&&&&
Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx
fuokZpu lnu] v”kksd jksM] ubZ fnYyh&110001
vf/klwpuk
fnukad % 4 tqykÃ] 2017
vk’kk<+ 13] 1939 ¼”kd½
3403
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
la[;k% 480@2017¼1½&ch-bZ-%&&jk’Vªirh; vkSj mijk’Vªirh; fuokZpu fu;e] 1974 ds fu;e 8 ds
vuqlj.k esa] fuokZpu vk;ksx ,r~n}kjk(
¼d½ viuh fnukad 4 tqykbZ] 2017 dh vf/klwpuk la0 480@2017&ch-bZ- ds vuqlkj mijk’Vªirh;
fuokZpu ds fy, ernku dk LFkku dejk la0 62] izFke ry] laln Hkou] ubZ fnYyh fu;r
djrk gS( vkSj
¼[k½ 10-00 cts iwokZg~u ls 5-00 cts vijkg~u nksuksa dks lfEefyr djrs gq, rd dk le; ,sls
le; ds :Ik esa fofufnZ’V djrk gS ftldks] ;fn vko”;d gqvk rks] mDr LFkku ij ernku
gksxkA
vkns”k ls]
vkj- ds- JhokLro
ofj’B iz/kku lfpoA
&&&&&&&&&&
ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi-110001.
NOTIFICATION
Dated, 4th July, 2017
Ashadha 13, 1939 (Saka)
No. 480/2017-BE.— Whereas, the term of office of Mohd. Hamid Ansari, Vice- President
of India, is upto 10th day of August, 2017, in terms of Article 67 of the Constitution; and
Whereas, an election is due to be held, in terms of clause (1) of Article 68 of the
Constitution, to fill the vacancy to be caused by the expiration of the term of office of the
incumbent Vice-President before the expiration of term of his office; and
Whereas, under sub-section (3) of Section 4 of the Presidential and Vice-Presidential
Elections Act, 1952 (31 of 1952), the Election Commission of India is required to so appoint the
dates for the election to fill the office of the Vice-President of India that the election will be
completed at such time as will enable the Vice-President thereby elected to enter upon his office on
the 11th day of August, 2017;
Now, therefore, the Election Commission of India hereby –
(A) calls upon the Electoral College, referred to in Article 66 of the Constitution, to elect a
person to fill the above vacancy in the Office of Vice-President of India before the
expiration of the term of the incumbent Vice-President, in accordance with the
provisions of the Constitution, the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections Act,
1952 (31 of 1952), and the Rules and Orders made thereunder; and
(B) in pursuance of sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the said Act, appoints -
(a) the 18th July, 2017 (Tuesday), as the last date for making nominations;
(b) the 19th July, 2017 (Wednesday), as the date for scrutiny of the nominations;
3404
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
(c) the 21st July, 2017 (Friday), as the last date for the withdrawal of candidatures;
and
(d) the 5th August, 2017 (Saturday), as the date on which a poll shall, if necessary, be
taken.
By order,
R K SRIVASTAVA,
Sr. Principal Secretary.
_____________
ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi-110001.
NOTIFICATION
Dated, 4th July, 2017
Ashadha, 13, 1939 (Saka)
No. 480/2017 (1)-B.E.—In pursuance of rule 8 of the Presidential and Vice- Presidential
Elections Rules, 1974, the Election Commission hereby;
(a) fixes Room No. 62, First Floor, Parliament House, New Delhi as the place of polling
for the Vice-President Eletion to be held in accordance with its Notification No.
480/2017-BE dated the 4th July, 2017; and
(b) specifies the hours from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. both inclusive to be the hours during
which the poll, if necessary, be taken at the said place of polling.
By order,
R. K. SRIVASTAVA,
Sr. Principal Secretary.
______________
mijk’Vªirh; fuokZpu] 2017 ds fy, fjVfuZax vkfQlj dk dk;kZy;
Hkkjr ds mijk’Vªifr in ds fy, fuokZpu
dh
yksd lwpuk
Hkkjr ds mijk’Vªifr in Hkjus ds fy, fuokZpu djus ds fy,] fuokZpu vk;ksx }kjk] jk’Vªirh; vkSj
mijk’Vªirh; fuokZpu vf/kfu;e] 1952 dh /kkjk 4 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu vf/klwpuk fudky nh xbZ gS]
vr% ,sls fuokZpu ds fy, fjVfuZx vkfQlj] eSa “ke”ksj ds- “kjhQ lwpuk nsrk gwa fd&
¼i½ vH;FkhZ ;k mlds izLFkkidksa ;k leFkZdksa esa ls fdlh ,d }kjk ukefunsZ”ku i=
fuEugLrk{kjdrkZ dks dejk ua- 29] Hkwry] laln Hkou] ubZ fnYyh esa mlds dk;kZy; esa ;k
;fn og vifjotZuh; :i ls vuqifLFkr gks] rks lgk;d fjVfuZax vkfQlj Jh eqdqy ikaMs]
vij lfpo ;k Jh jksgrkl] la;qDr lfpo] jkT; lHkk lfpoky; dks mDr dk;kZy; esa 18
3405
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
tqykbZ] 2017 rd ¼yksd vodk”k&fnu ls fHkUu½ fdlh fnu 11 cts iwokZg~u vkSj 3 cts
vijkg~u ds chp ifjnÙk fd, tk ldsaxs(
¼ii½ gj ,d ukefunsZ”ku i= ds lkFk ml lalnh; fuokZpu&{ks= dh fuokZpd ukekoyh esa vH;FkhZ
ls lEc) izfof’V dh ,d izekf.kr izfr yxkbZ tk,xh ftlesa vH;FkhZ fuokZpd ds :i esa
jftLVªhd`r gS(
¼iii½ gj vH;FkhZ dsoy iUnzg gtkj :i, dh jkf”k tek djsxk ;k tek djok,xkA ;g jde
ukefunsZ”ku i= izLrqr djrs le; fjVfuZax vkWfQlj ds ikl udn tek dh tk ldsxh ;k
Hkkjrh; fjtoZ cSad ;k fdlh ljdkjh [ktkus esa blls igys tek dh tk ldsxh vkSj
i”pkRdfFkr n”kk esa ,slh jlhn dk] ftlesa ;g nf”kZr fd;k gks fd mDr jkf”k tek dj nh
xbZ gS] ukefunZs”ku i= ds lkFk yxk;k tkuk vko”;d gksxk(
¼iv½ uke funsZ”ku i=ksa ds iz:i iwokZsDr dk;kZy; ls iwoksZDr le; ij ÁkIr fd, tk ldsaxs(
¼v½ vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 5[k dh mi/kkjk ¼4½ ds v/khu ukeatwj fd, x, ukefunsZ”ku i=ksa ls fHkUu
ukefunsZ”ku i=ksa dh laoh{kk mijksDr dk;kZy; eas dejk la- 29 Hkwry] laln Hkou] ubZ fnYyh
esa cq/kokj] 19 tqykbZ] 2017 dks iwokZg~u 11 cts dh tk,xh(
¼vi½ vH;fFkZrk okil ysus dh lwpuk vH;FkhZ] ;k mlds izLFkkidksa ;k leFkZdksa eas ls fdlh ,d }kjk]
tks vH;FkhZ }kjk fyf[kr :i ls bl fufeÙk izkf/kd`r fd;k x;k gks] fuEugLrk{kjdrkZ dks]
mijksDr iSjk ¼i½ esa fofufnZ’V LFkku esa 21 tqykbZ] 2017 dks rhu cts vijkg~u ls igys
ifjnÙk dh tk ldsxh(
¼vii½ fuokZpu yM+s tkus dh n”kk esa ernku bu fu;eksa ds v/khu fu;r fd, x, ernku ds LFkku
esa “kfuokj] 5 vxLr] 2017 dks iwokZg~u 10 cts vkSj vijkg~u 5 cts ds chp gksxkA
“ke”ksj ds- “kjhQ
ubZ fnYyh]
mijk’Vªirh; fuokZpu] 2017 ds fy,
fnukad% 4 tqykÃ] 2017
fjVfuaZx vkfQlj
vkSj
egklfpo] jkT; lHkk
&&&&&&&&&&
OFFICE OF THE RETRUNING OFFICER FOR
VICE-PRESIDENT ELECTION, 2017
PUBLIC NOTICE
OF
ELECTION TO THE OFFICE OF VICE-PRESIDENT OF INDIA
WHEREAS a notification under sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Presidential and Vice
Presidential Elections Act, 1952, for the holding of an election to fill the Office of Vice-President
of India has been issued by the Election Commission, I, Shumsher K. Sheriff, the Returning Officer
for such election, do hereby give notice that-
(i) nomination papers may be delivered by a candidate or any one of his proposers or
seconders to the undersigned at his office in Room No. 29, Ground Floor, Parliament
House, New Delhi, or if he is unavoidably absent, to the Assistant Retruning Officers,
Shri Mukul Pande, Additional Secretary or Shri Rohtas, Joint Secretary, Rajya Sabha
Secretariat at the said office between 11 A.M. and 3 P.M. on any day (other than a
public holiday) not later than the 18th of July, 2017;
3406
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
(ii) each nomination paper shall be accompanied by a certified copy of the entry relating to
the candidate in the electoral roll for the Parliamentary Constituency in which the
candidate is registered as an elector;
(iii) every candidate shall deposit or cause to be deposited a sum of rupees fifteen thousand
only. This amount may be deposited in cash with the Returning Officer at the time of
presentation of the nomination paper or deposited earlier in the Reserve Bank of India
or in a Government Teasury, and in the latter case a receipt showing that the said
deposit of the sum has been so made is required to be enclosed with the nomination
paper;
(iv) forms of nominmation papers may be obtained from the above said office at the times
aforesaid;
(v) the nomination papers, other than those rejected under sub-section (4) of section 5B of
the Act, will be taken up for scrutiny at the said office in Room No. 29, Ground Floor,
Parliament House, New Delhi on Wednesday, the 19th July, 2017, at 11.A.M. ;
(vi) the notice of withdrawal of candidatures may be delivered by a candidate, or any one
of his proposers or seconders who has been authorized in this behalf in writing by the
candidate, to the undersigned at the place specified in paragraph (i) above before three
o’clock in the afternoon of 21st of July, 2017;
(vii) in the event of the election being contested, the poll will be taken on Saturday, the 5th
August, 2017, between the hours of 10 A.M. and 5 P.M., at the place of polling fixed
under the rules.
New Delhi;
SHUMSHER K. SHERIFF
Dated the 4th July, 2017
RETURNING OFFICER FOR THE
VICE-PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, 2017
AND
SECRETARY-GENERAL, RAJYA SABHA
______________
LAW DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 1st July, 2017
No. LLR-A(2)-1/2014-Leg.—In exercise of the powers conferred by rule 4 of the Notaries
Rules, 1956, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, in supersession of previous Notification No.LLR-
A(2)- 1/2014-Leg. dated 7th November, 2014, is pleased to designate the senior most Deputy Legal
Remembrancer-cum-Deputy Secretary (Law-English) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh as
Competent Authority for the entire State of Himachal Pradesh for the purpose of the said rules,
with immediate effect.
By order,
DR. BALDEV SINGH
LR-cum-Pr. Secretary (Law).
3407
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
c vnkyr lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh ,oa uk;c rglhynkj] HkysbZ]
ftyk pEck ¼fg0 iz0½
Jh dkyk [kku iq= Qdh#] xkao pHkMw] ijxuk o mi&rglhy HkysbZ] ftyk pEck ¼fg0 iz0½
- - izkFkhZ
cuke
vke turk
- - Qjhdnks;eA
izkFkZuk&i= ckcr uke n#Lrh tsj /kkjk 37¼2½ fg0 iz0 Hkw&jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1954 ds vUrxZr djus ckjsA
izkFkhZ Jh dkyk [kku iq= Qdh#] xkao pHkMw] ijxuk o mi&rglhy HkysbZ] ftyk pEck ¼fg0 iz0½
us fuosnu fd;k gS fd xzke iapk;r vkSgjk ds ifjokj jftLVj ds fjdkMZ esa esjk uke dkyk [kku ntZ gS
tksfd lgh o n#Lr gS ysfdu jktLo fjdkMZ egky cusVw ds Hkw&bUnzkt esa esjk uke dkyk gh ntZ gS tksfd
xyr ntZ gS blfy, egky cusVw ds Hkw&jktLo ds bUnzkt esa esjk uke dkyk mQZ dkyk [kku n#Lr
djokuk pkgrk gwaA
vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj ds ek/;e ls lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh O;fDr dks
izkFkhZ mDr ds uke n#Lr djus ckjk dksbZ mtj o ,rjkt gks rks og fnukad 27&07&2017 dks izkr%
10-00 cts vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj gksdj viuk mtj o ,rjkt fyf[kr :i esa is'k djsaA vU;Fkk
izkFkhZ dk uke n#Lr djus ckjk vkns'k ikfjr dj fn;s tk;saxsA blds mijkUr dksbZ Hkh mtj o ,rjkt
dkfcys lek;r u gksxkA
vkt fnukad 21&06&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh fd;k x;kA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh]
HkysbZ] ftyk pEck ¼fg0 iz0½A
&&&&&&&
c vnkyr lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh ,oa uk;c rglhynkj] HkysbZ]
ftyk pEck ¼fg0 iz0½
Jh nsl jkt mQZ nslks iq= nwyks] xkao ckagxy] ijxuk o mi&rglhy HkysbZ] ftyk pEck ¼fg0iz0½
- - izkFkhZ
cuke
vke turk
- - Qjhdnks;eA
izkFkZuk&i= ckcr uke n#Lrh tsj /kkjk 37¼2½ fg0 iz0 Hkw&jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1954 ds vUrxZr djus ckjsA
izkFkhZ Jh nsl jkt mQZ nslks iq= nwyks] xkao ckagxy] ijxuk o mi&rglhy HkysbZ] ftyk
pEck ¼fg0 iz0½ us fuosnu fd;k gS fd xzke iapk;r okagxy ds ifjokj jftLVj ds fjdkMZ esa esjk uke nsl
jkt mQZ nslks ntZ gS tksfd lgh o n#Lr gS ysfdu jktLo fjdkMZ egky okagxy ds Hkw&bUnzkt esa esjk
3408
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
uke nslks gh ntZ gS tksfd xyr ntZ gS blfy, egky okagxy ds Hkw&jktLo ds bUnzkt esa viuk uke nslks
mQZ nsl jkt n#Lr djokuk pkgrk gwaA
vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj ds ek/;e ls lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh O;fDr dks
izkFkhZ mDr ds uke n#Lr djus ckjk dksbZ mtj o ,rjkt gks rks og fnukad 27&07&2017 dks izkr%
10-00 cts vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj gksdj viuk mtj o ,rjkt fyf[kr :i esa is'k djsaA vU;Fkk
izkFkhZ dk uke n#Lr djus ckjk vkns'k ikfjr dj fn;s tk;saxsA blds mijkUr dksbZ Hkh mtj o ,rjkt
dkfcys lek;r u gksxkA
vkt fnukad 21&06&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh fd;k x;kA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh]
HkysbZ] ftyk pEck ¼fg0 iz0½A
&&&&&&&
In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar,
District Mandi, H. P.
In the matter of :—
1.
Shri Parveen Singh s/o Shri Hoshiyar Singh, r/o Village Tapre, P.O. Tauni Devi, Tehsil
Hamirpur, District Hamirpur, H.P.
2.
Smt. Indra Devi d/o Subhash, r/o Village Bhaddyal, P.O. Tikker, Tehsil Balh, District
Mandi, H. P.
. . Applicants.
Versus
General Public
Subject.—Application for the registration of Marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act,
1954.
Shri Parveen Singh s/o Shri Hoshiyar Singh, r/o Village Tapre, P.O. Tauni Devi, Tehsil
Hamirpur, District Hamirpur, H.P. and Smt. Indra Devi d/o Subhash, r/o Village Bhaddyal, P.O.
Tikker, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H. P. (at present wife of Shri Parveen Singh s/o Shri Hoshiyar
Singh, r/o Village Tapre, P.O. Tauni Devi, Tehsil Hamirpur, District Hamirpur, H.P.) have filed an
application alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned under section 15 of Special Marriage
Act, 1954 that they have solemnized their marriage on 14-03-2017 according to Hindu rites and
customs at their respective houses and they are living together as husband and wife since then.
Hence, their marriage may be registered under Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who
has any objection regarding this marriage, can file the objection personally or in writing before this
3409
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
court on or before 21-07-2017 after that no objection will be entertained and marriage will be
registered.
Issued today on 20th day of June, 2017 under my hand and seal of the court.
Seal.
Sd/-
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Sadar, District Mandi (H.P.).
_________
In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar,
District Mandi, H. P.
In the matter of :—
1.
Shri Pankaj Sharma s/o Ashok Sharma, r/o Village & P.O. Nagwain, Tehsil Aut,
District Mandi, H.P.
2.
Smt. Malvika Sharma d/o Sudhir Raj, r/o H. No. 54/5 Palace Colony Mandi, District
Mandi, H. P.
. . Applicants.
Versus
General Public
Subject.—Application for the registration of Marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act,
1954.
Shri Pankaj Sharma s/o Ashok Sharma, r/o Village &, P.O. Nagwain, Tehsil Aut, District
Mandi, H.P. and Smt. Malvika Sharma d/o Sudhir Raj, r/o H. No. 54/5 Palace Colony Mandi,
District Mandi, H. P. (at present wife of Shri Pankaj Sharma s/o Ashok Sharma, r/o Village & P.O.
Nagwain, Tehsil Aut, District Mandi, H.P.) have filed an application alongwith affidavits in the
court of undersigned under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have solemnized
their marriage on 06-02-2017 according to Hindu rites and customs at their respective houses and
they are living together as husband and wife since then. Hence, their marriage may be registered
under Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who
has any objection regarding this marriage, can file the objection personally or in writing before this
court on or before 21-07-2017 after that no objection will be entertained and marriage will be
registered.
Issued today on 20th day of June, 2017 under my hand and seal of the court.
Seal.
Sd/-
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Sadar, District Mandi (H.P.).
3410
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar,
District Mandi, H. P.
In the matter of :—
1.
Shri Sudhir Malik s/o Shri Gulshan Kumar, r/o Village & P.O. Naharpur, Tehsil &
District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana.
2.
Smt. Geetanjali d/o Surinder Madan, r/o H. No. 66 Housing Board Colony Dohandi,
P.O. Nagchala, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi, H. P.
. . Applicants.
Versus
General Public
Subject.—Application for the registration of Marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act,
1954.
Shri Sudhir Malik s/o Shri Gulshan Kumar, r/o Village & P.O. Naharpur, Tehsil & District
Yamuna Nagar, Haryana and Smt. Geetanjali d/o Surinder Madan, r/o H. No. 66 Housing Board
Colony Dohandi, P.O. Nagchala, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi, H. P. (at present wife of Shri Sudhir
Malik s/o Shri Gulshan Kumar, r/o Village & P.O. Naharpur, Tehsil & District Yamuna Nagar,
Haryana) have filed an application alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned under section
15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have solemnized their marriage on 14-08-2016
according to Hindu rites and customs at their respective houses and they are living together as
husband and wife since then. Hence, their marriage may be registered under Special Marriage Act,
1954.
Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who
has any objection regarding this marriage, can file the objection personally or in writing before this
court on or before 15-07-2017 after that no objection will be entertained and marriage will be
registered.
Issued today on 14th day of June, 2017 under my hand and seal of the court.
Seal.
Sd/-
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Sadar, District Mandi (H.P.).
_________
c vnkyr cky d`".k 'kekZ lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh] /keZiqj] rglhy /keZiqj]
ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½
eqdíek 'kh"kZd % edQwn my[kcjhA
jke flag iq= pjSdyw jke] fuoklh Fkkrh] Mk0 dksV] rglhy /keZiqj] ftyk e.Mh] fg0 iz0 - - izkFkhZ
cuke
vke turk
- - izR;kFkhZx.k
3411
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
b'rgkj jkti=A
mijsDr fo"k; ds lUnHkZ esa Jh jke flag iq= pjSdyw jke] fuoklh Fkkrh] Mk0 dksV] rglhy /keZiqj]
ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½ us ,d izkFkZuk i= bl vk'k; ls U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;k gS fd izkFkhZ dk firk
fnukad 9&8&1995 dks ?kj ls viuh pkph ds vLrw ysdj gfj}kj fudyk Fkk tks vkt fnu rd okfil
ugh vk;k A izkFkhZ us vius firk dk bUrdky edQwn my[kcjh uEcj 443 ekSdk Fkkrh esa tk;t okjlku
jke flag] jktey iq= o jks'kuh nsoh iRuh pjSdyw lEHkkx&3 Hkkx o Jherh lhek nsoh] ehuw nsoh iq=h o
Jherh czgeh nsoh iRuh Lo0 Jh Hkkxey iq= pjSdyw iq= Hkxr lEHkkx&1 Hkkx ds uke rlnhd djus ds
fy, bl U;k;ky; esa is'k fd;k gSA
vr% vke turk dks ctfj;k b'rgkj lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh O;fDr dks mDr
bZUrdky uEcj 443 rlnhd gksus ckjs dksbZ mtj ;k ,rjkt gks rks og fnukad 26&7&2017 dks izkr% 10-00
cts gkftj vnkyr gksdj viuk ,rjkt is'k dj ldrs gSaA clwjr xSj gkftjh esa ,drjQk dk;Zokgh vey
esa ykbZ tkdj vkns'k ikfjr dj fn, tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 19&6&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
cky d`".k 'kekZ]
lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh]
/keZiqj ftyk e.MhA
&&&&&&&&
In the Court of Shri Ashutosh Garg, I.A.S., Sub Divisional Magistrate Nalagarh,
District Solan (H.P.) exercising the powers of Marriage Officer
under Special Marriage Act, 1954
Case No. : ..../ 2017 Date of Instt. : 06-06-2016
Pending for : 21-07-2017
Notice u/s 15 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 inviting the objections of the General
Public for the registration of marriage.
Notice to the General Public
Whereas, Shri Ram Asra s/o Shri Sita Ram, r/o Village Bhanglan, Tehsil Nalagarh, District
Solan, H.P. and Smt. Shobha Rani d/o Shri Dasaundhi Ram & w/o Shri Ram Asra, r/o Village
Bhanglan, Tehsil Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P. has moved an application u/s 15 of the Special
Marriage Act, 1954 for registration of their marriage that was solemnized on 01-12-1995.
And whereas both these applicants have submitted in their application and in their affidavits
that they were unmarried at the present time of solemnization of their marriage and were major in
age and having no prohibited relations to each other debarring them to marry each other. Both the
applicants have requested for registration of their marriage.
Therefore, by this notice the public in General is informed that if any one has any objection
regarding registration of this marriage, he may present before this court on or before 21-07-2017
3412
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 4 tqykbZ] 2017@13 vk"kk<+] 1939
for hearing of objections if any. In case no objection is received by dated 21-07-2017 it will be
presumed that there is no objection to the registration of the above said marriage and the same will
be registered on the said date.
Given under my hand and seal of the court on 20-06-2017.
Seal.
Sd/-
Marriage Officer-cum-(SDM),
Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P.
fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr
bysDVªkWfud gLrk{kfjr jkti=] oSclkbV http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in ij miyC/k gS ,oe~ vkWuykbu lR;kfir fd;k tk ldrk gS