jkti=] fgekpy izns'k
fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr
lkseokj] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
fgekpy izns'k ljdkj
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 11th April, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2016-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Bajro S/O Shri Dass Ram, R/O
Village Bhatwara, P.O. Radi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated
30.05.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. Division, Bharmour, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation
72&jkti=@2017&10&07&2017
¼3607½
3608
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same
could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report
under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 4.2.2013;
And whereas Shri Bajro S/O Shri Dass Ram agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 142/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.2.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of
the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the Hon’ble High
Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State
Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced
as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider
the cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006- IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Bajro S/O Shri Dass Ram, R/O Village
Bhatwara, P.O. Radi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during February, 2003 by the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Bharmour, District Chamba, H.P., who had
worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7
years vide demand notice dated 30.05.2011, without complying the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more
than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
3609
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001. the25 May, 2016
No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Jagjeet Singh S/O Shri Biru Ram, R/O
Village Dev Bharari, P.O. Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated 23.7.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer,
Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same
could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report
under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala,
District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 20 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order
dated 29.4.2015;
And whereas Shri Jagjeet Singh S/O Shri Biru Ram agitated the above orders of declining
of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 244/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 23.2.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of
the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the Hon’ble High
Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State
Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced
as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider
the cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Jagjeet Singh S/O Shri Biru Ram, R/O
Village Dev Bharari, P.O. Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during December,
1990 by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who
had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 20
years vide demand notice dated 23.07.2011, without complying the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not,
keeping in view of delay of more than 20 years in raising the industrial dispute, what
3610
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above
exworker is entitled to from the above employer /management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 13th July, 2016
No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Jan Mohhammad S/O Shri Firoj Deen,
R/O Village Nihad, P.O. Aundh, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice
datednil-received in Labour Office, Dharamshala on 13.06.2011 regarding his illegal termination
from the services by (1) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur, Tehsil Nurpur,
District Kangra, H.P. (2) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, Tehsil Nurpur,
District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra,
H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the
course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala,
District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that as per reply filed by the above employers worker has not
worked with the employers No. (1) & (2) and had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than
20 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 18.09.2013;
And whereas Shri Jan Mohhammad S/O Shri Firoj Deen agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 783/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 7.4.2016 and directed the respondents to consider
the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the
Hon’ble High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal
Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment
is reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider
the cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4.
The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006- IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
3611
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Jan Mohhammad S/O Shri Firoj Deen,
R/O Village Nihad, P.O. Aundh, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990 by (1) The
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (2) The
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., who had
worked on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 20 years vide demand
notice dated-nil-received on 13.06.2011, without complying the provisions of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of
delay of more than 20 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority,
past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 26th April, 2016
No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Jiwan Lal S/O Shri Amar Chand, R/O
Village and Post Office Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated 23.7.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer,
Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same
could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report
under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala,
District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 21 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order
dated 8.12.2014;
And whereas Shri Jiwan Lal S/O Shri Amar Chand agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 245/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 25.2.2016 and directed the respondents to
consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014
passed by the Hon’ble High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap
Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The
operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
3612
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider
the cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Jiwan Lal S/O Shri Amar Chand, R/O
Village and Post Office Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during February, 1990 by the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked as beldar
on daily wages for 68 days during year, 1987, for 171 days during year, 1988, for 27 days during
year, 1989 and 40 days during year, 1990 respectively and has raised his industrial dispute after
more than 21 years vide demand notice dated 23.7.2011, without complying the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period of 68
days during year, 1987, for 171 days during year, 1988, for 27 days during year, 1989 and 40 days
during year, 1990 respectively and delay of more than 21 years in raising the industrial dispute,
what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above exworker
is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 30 May, 2016
No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016-Kangra.— Whereas Shri Joginder Singh S/O Shri Hari Singh,
R/O Village Lunder, P.O. Khel, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice
datednil-received in Labour Office, Dharamshala on 13.06.2011 regarding his illegal termination
from the services by (1) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur, Tehsil Nurpur,
District Kangra, H.P. (2) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, Tehsil Nurpur,
District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra,
H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the
course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala,
District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
3613
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
Government came to the conclusion that as per reply filed by the above employers worker has not
worked with the employers No. (1) & (2) and had raised the dispute at a belated stage of about 21
years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 31.8.2013;
And whereas Shri Joginder Singh S/O Shri Hari Singh agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 812/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 7.4.2016 and directed the respondents to consider
the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the
Hon’ble High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal
Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment
is reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents toconsider the
cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight weeks.
The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006- IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Joginder Singh S/O Shri Hari Singh, R/O
Village Lunder, P.O. Khel, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990 by (1)
The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra,
H.P. (2) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, Tehsil Nurpur, District
Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after
about 21 years vide demand notice dated-nil-received on 13.06.2011, without complying the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and
justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of about 21 years in raising the industrial dispute,
what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-
worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 11th April, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2016-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Karam Chand S/O Shri Mohan, R/O
Village Chanehla, P.O. Preena, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated
3614
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
30.05.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. Division, Bharmour, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same
could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report
under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 5.2.2013;
And whereas Shri Karam Chand S/O Shri Mohan agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 150/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.2.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of
the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the Hon’ble High
Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State
Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced
as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider
the cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006- IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Karam Chand S/O Shri Mohan, R/O
Village Chanehla, P.O. Preena, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during February, 2003 by
the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Bharmour, District Chamba, H.P., who had
worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7
years vide demand notice dated 30.05.2011, without complying the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more
than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
3615
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 6th May, 2016
No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016-Kangra.— Whereas Shri Karnail Singh S/O Shri Dhian Chand,
R/O Village Niari, P.O. Gurchal, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated 23.7.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer,
Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same
could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report
under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala,
District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of about 24 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated
2.12.2014;
And whereas Shri Karnail Singh S/O Shri Dhian Chand agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 254/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 23.2.2016 and directed the respondents to
consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by
the Hon’ble High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus
Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the
judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight weeks.
The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4.
The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Karnail Singh S/O Shri Dhian Chand, R/O
Village Niari, P.O. Gurchal, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during July, 1987 by the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked
as beldar on daily wages for 94 days during year, 1986 and for 120 days during year, 1987
respectively and has raised his industrial dispute after about 24 years vide demand notice
dated 23.7.2011, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is
legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period of 94 days during year, 1986
and for 120 days during year, 1987 respectively and delay of about 24 years in raising the
3616
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 30th May, 2016
No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Kash Mohhamad S/O Shri Swarli
(Subarli), R/O Village Nihad, P.O. Aund, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated-nil-received in Labour Office, Dharamshala on 13.06.2011 regarding his illegal
termination from the services by (1) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur, Tehsil
Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (2) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, Tehsil
Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District
Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during
the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala,
District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that as per reply filed by the above employers worker has not
worked with the employers No. (1) & (2) and had raised the dispute at a belated stage of about 21
years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 22.8.2013;
And whereas Shri Kash Mohhamad S/O Shri Swarli (Subarli) agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 788/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 7.4.2016 and directed the respondents to consider
the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the
Hon’ble High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal
Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment
is reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight weeks.
The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4.
The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
3617
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Kash Mohhamad S/O Shri Swarli
(Subarli), R/O Village Nihad, P.O. Aund, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during
year, 1990 by (1) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur, Tehsil Nurpur, District
Kangra, H.P. (2) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, Tehsil Nurpur, District
Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after about 21
years vide demand notice dated-nil-received on 13.06.2011, without complying the provisions of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, keeping
in view of delay of about 21 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 26th April, 2016
No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016-Kangra.— Whereas Shri Kishan Bahadur S/O Shri Dubel
Singh, R/O Village Khajjan, P.O. Sadwan, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a
demand notice dated-nil-received in Labour Office, Dharamshala on 13.06.2011 regarding his
illegal termination from the services by the (1) Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur,
Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (2) Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, Tehsil
Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District
Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during
the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala,
District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that as per reply filed by the above employers worker has not
worked with the employers No. (1) & (2) and had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than
20 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 18.09.2013;
And whereas Shri Kishan Bahadur S/O Shri Dubel Singh agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 723/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 31.3.2016 and directed the Labour
Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six
weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
3618
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned order inthe writ
petition and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-
cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ petition is disposed
of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006- IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Kishan Bahadur S/O Shri Dubel Singh,
R/O Village Khajjan, P.O. Sadwan, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990
by (1) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur, Tehsil Nurpur, District
Kangra, H.P. (2) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, Tehsil Nurpur,
District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute
after more than 20 years vide demand notice dated-nil-received on 13.06.2011, without
complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman,
is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 20 years in raising the
industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 25 May, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2016-Chamba.— Whereas Shri Kuldeep S/O Shri Mankoo Ram,
R/O Village Chanehla, P.O. Preena, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated 30.5.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. Division, Bharmour, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation
Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same
could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report
under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 5.2.2013;
And whereas Shri Kuldeep S/O Shri Mankoo Ram agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
3619
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 737/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 6.4.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of
the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the Hon’ble High
Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State
Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced
as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider
the cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Kuldeep S/O Shri Mankoo Ram, R/O
Village Chanehla, P.O. Preena, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during March, 2004 by the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Bharmour, District Chamba, H.P., who had
worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7
years vide demand notice dated 30.5.2011, without complying the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more
than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 30 May, 2016
No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016-Kangra.— Whereas Shri Labhu Ram S/O Shri Relu Ram, R/O
Village Kot- Plahari, P.O. Kot, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated-nilreceived in Labour Office, Dharamshala on 13.06.2011 regarding his illegal termination
from the services by (1) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur, Tehsil Nurpur,
District Kangra, H.P. (2) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, Tehsil Nurpur,
District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra,
H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the
3620
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala,
District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that as per reply filed by the above employers worker has not
worked with the employers No. (1) & (2) and had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than
20 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 31.08.2013;
And whereas Shri Labhu Ram S/O Shri Relu Ram agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 789/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 7.4.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of
the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the Hon’ble High
Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State
Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced
as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider
the cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4.
The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Labhu Ram S/O Shri Relu Ram, R/O
Village Kot-Plahari, P.O. Kot, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990 by (1)
The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra,
H.P. (2) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, Tehsil Nurpur, District
Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after
more than 20 years vide demand notice dated-nil-received on 13.06.2011, without
complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman,
is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 20 years in raising the
industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer /management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
3621
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 18th April, 2016
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2016-Mandi (Part-II).—Whereas Shri Lajja Ram S/O Shri Mangat
Ram, R/O Village Jod, P.O. and Tehsil Thunag, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated 23.08.2008 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,
I.&P.H. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same
could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report
under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi,
District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of about 8 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated
14.11.2014;
And whereas Shri Lajja Ram S/O Shri Mangat Ram agitated the above orders of declining
of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4856/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 6.1.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of
the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the Hon’ble High
Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State
Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced
as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider
the cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4.
The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006- IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Lajja Ram S/O Shri Mangat Ram, R/O
Village Jod, P.O. and Tehsil Thunag, District Mandi, H.P. during November, 2000 by the
Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P., who had
worked as beldar on daily wages for 83 days during year, 1998, 199 days during year, 1999
and 200 days during year, 2000 respectively and has raised his industrial dispute after about
8 years vide demand notice dated 23.08.2008, without complying the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working
period of 83 days during year, 1998, 199 days during year, 1999 and 200 days during year,
3622
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
2000 respectively and delay of about 8 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount
of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 17 March, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Lal Dei W/O Shri Jagdish Chand,
R/O Village Karel, P.O. Ponto, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice
dated 06.10.211 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,
H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably,
but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent
a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner,
H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 30.03.2013;
And whereas Smt. Lal Dei W/O Shri Jagdish Chand agitated the above orders of declining
of reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 128/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case
of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 in CWP No. 9467 of 2014
case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight
weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider
the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
3623
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Lal Dei W/O Shri Jagdish Chand, R/O
Village Karel, P.O. Ponto, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004 by the
Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P., who
had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised her industrial dispute after more than 7 years
vide demand notice dated 06.10.2011, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 7 years in raising the
industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation
the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 1st July, 2016
No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Maggar Singh S/O Shri Dalku Ram,
R/O Village and Post Office Aundh, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand
notice datednil- received in Labour Office, Dharamshala on 13.06.2011 regarding his illegal
termination from the services by (1) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur, Tehsil
Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (2) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, Tehsil
Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District
Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during
the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala,
District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that as per reply filed by the above employers worker has not
worked with the employers No. (1) & (2) and had raised the dispute at a belated stage of after about
21 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 22.08.2013;
And whereas Shri Maggar Singh S/O Shri Dalku Ram agitated the above orders of declining
of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 816/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 7.4.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of
the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the Hon’ble High
Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State
Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced
as follows;
3624
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight weeks.
The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4.
The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006- IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Maggar Singh S/O Shri Dalku Ram, R/O
Village and Post Office Aundh, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990 by (1) The
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (2) The
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., who had
worked on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after about 21 years vide demand notice
dated-nil-received on 13.06.2011, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of about 21
years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits
and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 30 May, 2016
No. 11-3/93(Lab) ID/2016-Kullu.—Whereas Shri Mehar Chand S/O Shri Lot Ram, R/O
Village Sees, P.O. Thela, District Kullu, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 11.03.2014
regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Senior Executive Engineer, Electrical
Division, H.P.S.E.B.L. Kullu, District Kullu, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer,
Kullu, District Kullu, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be
settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section
12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kullu, District
Kullu, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 14 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 4.7.2015;
And whereas Shri Mehar Chand S/O Shri Lot Ram agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
3625
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4189/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 27.10.2015 and directed the respondents to consider the case
of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the Hon’ble
High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh
State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is
reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight weeks.
The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Mehar Chand S/O Shri Lot Ram, R/O
Village Sees, P.O. Thela, District Kullu, H.P. w.e.f. 26.05.1999 by the Senior Executive Engineer,
Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B.L. Kullu, District Kullu, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily
wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 14 years vide demand notice dated
11.03.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 14 years in raising the industrial dispute,
what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker
is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 30 May, 2016
No. 11-3/93(Lab) ID/2016-Kullu.—Whereas Shri Chaman Lal S/O Shri Septi Ram, R/O
Village Aaisha, P.O. Thela, District Kullu, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 11.03.2014
regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Senior Executive Engineer, Electrical
Division, H.P.S.E.B.L. Kullu, District Kullu, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer,
Kullu, District Kullu, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be
settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section
12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kullu, District
Kullu, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
3626
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 18 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 29.6.2015;
And whereas Shri Chaman Lal S/O Shri Septi Ram agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4189/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 27.10.2015 and directed the respondents to consider the case
of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the Hon’ble
High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh
State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is
reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight weeks.
The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4.
The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006- IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Chaman Lal S/O Shri Septi Ram, R/O
Village Aaisha, P.O. Thela, District Kullu, H.P. w.e.f. 26.10.1995 by the Senior Executive
Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B.L. Kullu, District Kullu, H.P., who had worked as
beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 18 years vide
demand notice dated 11.03.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 18
years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 30 May, 2016
3627
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
No. 11-3/93(Lab) ID/2016-Kullu.—Whereas Shri Salig Ram S/O Shri Man Chand, R/O
Village Najan, P.O. Thela, District Kullu, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 29.04.2014
regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Senior Executive Engineer, Electrical
Division, H.P.S.E.B.L. Kullu, District Kullu, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer,
Kullu, District Kullu, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be
settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section
12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kullu, District
Kullu, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 16 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 1.7.2015;
And whereas Shri Salig Ram S/O Shri Man Chand agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4189/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 27.10.2015 and directed the respondents to consider the case
of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the Hon’ble
High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh
State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is
reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider
the cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4.
The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Salig Ram S/O Shri Man Chand, R/O
Village Najan, P.O. Thela, District Kullu, H.P. w.e.f. 26.3.1998 by the Senior Executive
Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B.L. Kullu, District Kullu, H.P., who had worked as
beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 16 years vide
demand notice dated 29.4.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 16 years in
raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits
and
compensation
the
above
ex-worker
is
entitled
to
from
the
above
employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
3628
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 30 May, 2016
No. 11-3/93(Lab) ID/2016-Kullu.—Whereas Shri Ram Singh S/O Shri Septi Ram, R/O
Village Najan, P.O. Thella, District Kullu, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 11.3.2014
regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Senior Executive Engineer, Electrical
Division, H.P.S.E.B.L. Kullu, District Kullu, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer,
Kullu, District Kullu, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be
settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section
12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kullu, District
Kullu, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of
more than 15 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 29.6.2015;
And whereas Shri Ram Singh S/O Shri Septi Ram agitated the above orders of declining of
reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4189/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 27.10.2015 and directed the respondents to consider the case
of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the Hon’ble
High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh
State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is
reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider
the cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006- IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Ram Singh S/O Shri Septi Ram, R/O
Village Najan, P.O. Thella, District Kullu, H.P. w.e.f. 26.5.1998 by the Senior Executive
Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B.L. Kullu, District Kullu, H.P., who had worked as
beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 15 years vide
demand notice dated 11.3.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 15 years in
3629
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits
and
compensation
the
above
ex-worker
is
entitled
to
from
the
above
employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the1st July, 2016
No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Milap Chand S/O Shri Gian Chand,
R/O Village Keyod Garian, P.O Chowki, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated-nil-received in Labour Office, Dharamshala on 13.06.2011 regarding his illegal
termination from the services by (1) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur, Tehsil
Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (2) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, Tehsil
Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District
Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during
the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala,
District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that as per reply filed by the above employers worker has not
worked with the employers No. (1) & (2) and had raised the dispute at a belated stage of after about
21 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 22.08.2013;
And whereas Shri Milap Chand S/O Shri Gian Chand agitated the above orders of declining
of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 781/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the civil writ petition on 7.4.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of
the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by the Hon’ble High
Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State
Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced
as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight weeks.
The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006- IV-Loose, Dated 15th
3630
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Milap Chand S/O Shri Gian Chand, R/O
Village Keyod Garian, P.O Chowki, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990
by (1) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Nurpur, Tehsil Nurpur, District
Kangra, H.P. (2) The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, Tehsil Nurpur,
District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute
after about 21 years vide demand notice dated-nil-received on 13.06.2011, without
complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman,
is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of about 21 years in raising the
industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 30 May, 2016
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2016-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Mohan Singh S/O Lt. Shri Inder
Singh, R/O Village Aran, P.O. Katindi, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated 28.11.2013 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive
Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Mnadi District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same
could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report
under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi,
District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 18 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order
dated 9.12.2014;
And whereas Shri Mohan Singh S/O Lt. Shri Inder Singh agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4813/2015. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 11.5.2016 and directed the respondents to
consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by
the Hon’ble High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus
Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the
judgment is reproduced as follows;
3631
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider
the cases of the petitioner, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4.
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Mohan Singh S/O Lt. Shri Inder Singh,
R/O Village Aran, P.O. Katindi, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 21.03.1995 by the
Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Padhar, District Mandi, H.P., who had worked on
daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 18 years vide demand
notice dated 28.11.2013, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 18 years in raising
the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 18th May, 2016
No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Naresh Kumar S/O Shri Gorkh Ram,
R/O Village Dev Bharari, P.O. Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand
notice dated 23.7.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the
same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report
under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala,
District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of about 23 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated
2.12.2014;
And whereas Shri Naresh Kumar S/O Shri Gorkh Ram agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 257/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
3632
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 25.2.2016 and directed the respondents to
consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 passed by
the Hon’ble High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus
Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the
judgment is reproduced as follows;
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight weeks.
The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”
Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006- IV-Loose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-
Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following
issue/issues for legal adjudication;
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Naresh Kumar S/O Shri Gorkh Ram, R/O
Village Dev Bharari, P.O. Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during November,
1988 by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who
had worked as beldar on daily wages for 5 days during year, 1986, for 158 ½ days during
year, 1987 and for 45 days during year, 1988 respectively and has raised his industrial
dispute after about 23 years vide demand notice dated 23.7.2011, without complying the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in
view of working period of 5 days during year, 1986, 158 ½ days during year, 1987 and for
45 days during year, 1988 respectively and delay of about 23 years in raising the industrial
dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 6th July, 2016
No.: 11-2/86(Lab)ID/2016/Bilaspur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Sant Ram S/O Shri Bhagwanu Ram, R/O Village Palsehar, P.O. Lehari,
Tehsil Shri Naina Deviji, District Bilaspur, H.P. and (i) the Partners, M/S Universal Electric
Engineers, Dalhousie Road Pathankot, Punjab (Contractor) and (ii) the Executive Engineer,
Changer Area Lift Irrigation Project Division Bassi, District Bilaspur, H.P.(Principal Employer) on
the issue of alleged termination of his services w.e.f. 01-07-2012.
3633
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of services of Shri Sant Ram S/O Shri Bhagwanu Ram, R/O Village
Palsehar, P.O. Lehari, Tehsil Shri Naina Deviji, District Bilaspur, H.P. w.e.f. 01-07-2012 by
(i) the Partners, M/S Universal Electric Engineers, Dalhousie Road Pathankot, Punjab
(Contractor) and (ii) the Executive Engineer, Changer Area Lift Irrigation Project Division
Bassi, District Bilaspur, H.P.(Principal Employer), without complying with the provisions
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back
wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to
from the above employers?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 6th July, 2016
No.: 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2016/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between of Shri Sunil Kumar S/O Shri Pritam Chand, R/O Village Lahar, P.O.
Tikkari, Tehsil Sinhuta, District Chamba, H.P. and (i) the Employer/Managing Director, M/S Dehar
II Small Hydro Electric Project, V.P.O. Tikri, Sub Tehsil Sihunta, District Chamba, H.P.(Site
Office) (ii) the Employer, M/S Saini Techno Constructs Private Limited, 236, Bajri Company,
Burmah Shell Road, Pathankot, Punjab (Present Office) on the issue of alleged termination of his
services w.e.f. 12-11-2014.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
3634
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Sunil Kumar S/O Shri Pritam Chand, R/O
Village Lahar, P.O. Tikkari, Tehsil Sinhuta, District Chamba, H.P. w.e.f. 12-11-2014 by (i)
the Employer/Managing Director, M/S Dehar II Small Hydro Electric Project, V.P.O. Tikri,
Sub Tehsil Sihunta, District Chamba, H.P.(Site Office) (ii) the Employer/Management, M/S
Saini Techno Constructs Private Limited, 236, Bajri Company, Burmah Shell Road,
Pathankot, Punjab (Present Office) without complying with the provisions of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 6th July, 2016
No.: 11-2/86(Lab)ID/2016/Bilaspur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Surender Kumar S/O Shri Daya Ram, R/O Village Roura Jaman, P.O.
Tarsu, Tehsil Shri Naina Deviji, District Bilaspur, H.P. and (i) the Partners, M/S Universal Electric
Engineers, Dalhousie Road Pathankot, Punjab (Contractor) and (ii) the Executive Engineer,
Changer Area Lift Irrigation Project Division Bassi, District Bilaspur, H.P.(Principal Employer) on
the issue of alleged termination of his services w.e.f. 01-07-2012.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of services of Shri Surender Kumar S/O Shri Daya Ram, R/O Village
Roura Jaman, P.O. Tarsu, Tehsil Shri Naina Deviji, District Bilaspur, H.P. w.e.f. 01-07-
2012 by (i) the Partners, M/S Universal Electric Engineers, Dalhousie Road Pathankot,
Punjab (Contractor) and (ii) the Executive Engineer, Changer Area Lift Irrigation Project
Division Bassi, District Bilaspur, H.P.(Principal Employer), without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
3635
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled
to from the above employers?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 28th March, 2017
No.: 11-2/86(Lab)ID/2017/Bilaspur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Smt. Banita Devi W/O Shri Dev Raj, R/O V.P.O. Nihari, Tehsil
Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, H.P. and (i) the Chief Medical Officer, Regional Hospital, Bilaspur,
H.P. (Principal employer) (ii) the Proprietor M/S Shimla Cleanways, H.O. Sahibu Niwas, Sector-2,
New Shimla, H.P. (contractor)on the issue of alleged termination of her daily wages services w.e.f.
26-04-2016.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Smt. Banita Devi W/O Shri Dev Raj, R/O V.P.O.
Nihari, Tehsil Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, H.P. w.e.f. 26-04-2016 by (i) the Chief
Medical Officer, Regional Hospital, Bilaspur, H.P. (Principal employer) (ii) the Proprietor,
M/S Shimla Cleanways, H.O. Sahibu Niwas, Sector-2, New Shimla, H.P. (contractor),
without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and
justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
3636
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 29th May, 2017
No.: 11-2/86Lab)ID/2017/Bilaspur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Bishnu Ram S/O Shri Sant Ram, R/O V.P.O. Sunhani, Tehsil Jhanduta,
District Bilaspur, H.P. and (i) the Employer/Manager, M/S GVK EMRI, J P Motors Building,
Village Anji, Barog Bye Pass Solan, District Solan, H.P. (ii) the Mission Director, National Health
Rural Mission, Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla (iii) the Employer/Managing Director,
M/S Adecco Flexione Workforce Solutions Private Limited, C-127, Basement Level, Satguru
Infotech, Phase-VIII, Industrial Area Mohali. Punjab (Contractor company) (iv)the Managing
Director, M/S Adecco India Private Limited, No. 2, NAL Wind Tunnel Road, Murugeshpalya,
Bangalore. (Corporate Office) on the issue of alleged termination of his services w.e.f. 06-02-2013.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Bishnu Ram S/O Shri Sant Ram, R/O V.P.O.
Sunhani, Tehsil Jhanduta, District Bilaspur, H.P. w.e.f. 06-02-2013 by (i) the
Employer/Manager, M/S GVK EMRI, J P Motors Building, Village Anji, Barog Bye Pass
Solan, District Solan, H.P. (ii) the Mission Director, National Health Rural Mission,
Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla (iii) the Employer/Managing Director, M/S
Adecco Flexione Workforce Solutions Private Limited, C-127, Basement Level, Satguru
Infotech, Phase-VIII, Industrial Area Mohali. Punjab (Contractor company) (iv)the
Managing Director, M/S Adecco India Private Limited, No. 2, NAL Wind Tunnel Road,
Murugeshpalya, Bangalore. (Corporate Office), without complying with the provisions of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the
above employers/ Management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
3637
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Dated: 05th July, 2017
No.PLG-B(6)-2/2014-L.—In continuation of this Department notification of even number
dated 12/06/2017 vide which Sh. Tara Chand Chauhan, has been re-employed on the post of Ex-
cadre District Planning Officer Shimla, in the Planning Department , Himachal Pradesh Shimla-2
for a period of six month. The Governor Himachal Pradesh is pleased to fix the following terms and
conditions.
Salary
His pay shall be fixed in accordance with the provision of H.P. State
Civil Services (Fixation of Pay on re-employed pensioners) Orders,
1988 circulated vide Finance Department OM N0.Fin(C) B (7)-10/84
dated 1.12.1988, OM.N0.Fin(C)-B (7)-10/98 dated 8th September,
1999 and read with O.M. No. Fin(C) B (2)13/2009 dated 19th
December, 2010 or amended from time to time.
Tenure
The tenure of re-employment shall be for a period of six month or upto
31/12/2017.
Provided that the Government can terminate this appointment even
before the expiry of the above period by serving him a notice of one
month in advance or by paying one month`s salary in lieu of notice of
one month, in case the conduct and performance of the incumbent is
not found satisfactory of if the Government decides to fill up the post,
in question, by regular appointment, as the case may be.
TA/DA
He shall be entitled to TA/DA as admissible to him before his re-
employment.
Leave
The provisions of CCS (Leave) Rules, 1972, Shall not be applicable to
the reemployed pensioner and he will not be entitled to LTC/HTLTC
facility. However, will be entitled to one casual leave for each
completed month.
Medical Facilities
He shall be entitled to avail medical facilities and a grant of re-
imbursement of Medical Expenses as is admissible under the relevant
rules / instructons of the State Government.
Residential
He shall be entitled to the allotment of Government Residential
accommodation, if the Accommodation is available or otherwise he
will be entitled to receive House
Accommodation
Rent Allowance as per State Government Rules and instructions, in
this regard.
Gratuity and Death-
cum-Retirement
Gravity
He shall not be eligible for Gratuity and Death-cum-Retirement
Gratuity for the period of said re-employment.
3638
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
Other Facilities
He Shall be entitled to the allowances as were admissible to him before
his reemployment or as admissible for the post against which he has
been reemployed. There will be no enhancement in salry on re-
employment.
Other Facilities
He Shall be entitled to the allowances as were admissible to him before
his reemployment or as admissible for the post against which he has
been reemployed. There will be no enhancement in salry on re-
employment.
By order,
Sd/-
Addl. Chief Secy. (Planning).
____________
[AUTHORITATIVE ENGLISH TEXT OF THIS DEPARTMENT NOTIFICATION No.TCP-F(5)-
11/2016 SHIMLA, DATED 5.7.2017 AS REQUIRED UNDER CLAUSE (3) OF ARTICLE 348 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA].
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2,the 5th July,2017
No.TCP-F(5)-11/2016.—WHEREAS, the revised draft Development Plan for Rampur
Planning Area was published by the Director, Town and Country Planning Department, Himachal
Pradesh under sub-section (1) of section 19 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1977 (Act No.
12 of 1977) read with rule 11 of the Himachal Pradesh Town and Country Planning Rules, 2014
vide Notice No. HIM/TP/PJT/D.P. Rampur/2010/Vol-IV/9450-68 dated 17.05.2016 in the Rajpatra,
Himachal Pradesh on 25th May, 2016 for inviting objection(s) and suggestion(s), which were duly
considered and modifications were made, wherever required and same was submitted to the
Government for approval on 24.11.2016;
NOW, THEREFORE, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 20
of the Act ibid, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to approve the revised Development
Plan for Rampur Planning Area, without any modification and the same is hereby published in the
Official Gazette as required under sub-section (4) of section 20 of the Act ibid. A Notice is hereby
given that a copy of the said revised Development Plan is available for inspection during office
hours in the following offices, namely:—
1.
The Director,
Town and Country Planning Department,
Nagar Yojana Bhawan, Block No. 32-A, Vikas Nagar,
Kasumpati, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh-171009.
2.
The Assistant Town Planner,
Sub-Divisional Town Planning Office,
Rampur, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.
3639
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
3.
The Executive Officer,
Municipal Council, Rampur,
District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.
By order,
MANISHA NANDA
Addl. Chief Secretary (TCP).
_____________
uxj ,oa xzke ;kstuk foHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f'keyk&2] 05 tqykbZ] 2017
la[;k- Vh0lh0ih0&,Q¼5½&11@2016-&la'kksf/kr ijek.kq ;kstuk {ks= ds fy, fodkl ;kstuk ds
izk:Ik dks] fgekpy izns”k uxj vkSj xzke ;kstuk vf/kfu;e] 1977 (1977 dk vf/kfu;e la[;kad 12) dh
/kkjk 19 dh mi/kkjk (1) ds v/khu vk{ksi ¼iksa½ vkSj lq>ko ¼oksa½ dks vkeaf=r djus ds fy, funs'kd] uxj
,oa
;kstuk
foHkkx]
fgekpy
izns'k
}kjk]
uksfVl
la[;k%fge@Vhih@[email protected]@
2009@oksY;we&IV@9450&68 fnukad 17-5-2016 }kjk izdkf'kr fd;k x;k Fkk fdUrq fu;r vof/k ds Hkhrj
dksbZ vk{ksi ;k lq>ko izkIr ugha gqvk gS@gq, gSA
blfy,] fodkl ;kstuk esa dksbZ mikUrj.k ugha fd, x, gSaA
vr% fgekpy izns”k ds jkT;iky] fgekpy izns”k uxj vkSj xzke ;kstuk vf/kfu;e] 1977 (1977 dk
vf/kfu;e la[;kad 12) dh /kkjk 20 dh mi/kkjk (1) ds v/khu fufgr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ijek.kq
;kstuk {ks= ds fy, la'kksf/kr fodkl ;kstuk dks fcuk fdlh mikUrj.k ds vuqeksfnr djrs gSa vkSj bls
iwoksZDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 20 dh mi/kkjk ¼4½ ds v/khu ;Fkk visf{kr ds vuqlkj jkti= esa ,rn~}kjk
izdkf'kr fd;k tkrk gSA ,rn~}kjk uksfVl fn;k tkrk gS fd mDr la'kksf/kr fodkl ;kstuk dh izfr
fuEufyf[kr dk;kZy;ksa esa dk;kZy; le; ds nkSjku fujh{k.k gsrq miyC/k jgsxh%&
1-
funs'kd]
uxj ,oa xzke ;kstuk foHkkx]
dLkqEiVh] f'keyk&171009-
2-
lgk;d uxj ;kstukdkj] mi&e.Myh;
uxj ;kstuk dk;kZy;] ijok.kq] ftyk lksyuA
3-
dk;Zdkjh vf/kdkjh
uxj ifj’kn~] ijek.kq] ftyk lksyuA
mDr la'kksf/kr ijek.kq ;kstuk ;kstuk bl vf/klwpuk ds jkti=] fgekpy izns'k ds izdk'ku dh
rkjh[k ls izofrZr gksxhA
vkns”k }kjk]
Ekuh’kk uUnk
vfrfjDr eq[; lfpo ¼Vh0lh0ih0½A
3640
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
uxj ,oa xzke ;kstuk foHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f'keyk&2] 5 tqykbZ] 2017
la[;k- Vh0lh0ih0&,Q¼5½&2@2017-&dqYyw ?kkVh ;kstuk {ks= dh dqYyw&HkqUrj vXykejs'ku ds fy,
fodkl fodkl ;kstuk ds izk:Ik dks] fgekpy izns”k uxj vkSj xzke ;kstuk fu;e] 2014 ds fu;e 11 ds
lkFk ifBr fgekpy izns'k uxj vkSj xzke ;kstuk vf/kfu;e] 1977 ¼1977 dk vf/kfu;e la[;kad 12½ dh
/kkjk 19 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu funs'kd] uxj ,oa ;kstuk foHkkx] fgekpy izns'k ds uksfVl la[;k%
fge@Vhih@ihtsVh@Mh-ih dqYyw&HkqUrj@2004@oksY;we&IV@16673&89 rkjh[k 18-11-2016 }kjk jkti=]
fgekpy izns'k esa rkjh[k 21 uoEcj] 2016 dks vk{ksi ¼iksa½ vkSj lq>ko ¼oksa½ dks vkeaf=r djus ds fy,
izdkf'kr fd;k x;k Fkk ftu ij lE;d~] :Ik ls fopkj fd;k x;k vkSj tgka dgha visf{kr Fkk] mikUrj.k
fd, x, vkSj ftUgsa rkjh[k 11-04- 2017 dks ljdkj dks vuqeksnu ds fy, izLrqr fd;k x;k Fkk(
vr% fgekpy izns”k ds jkT;iky] iwoksZDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 20 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznRr
'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] dqYyw ?kkVh ;kstuk {ks= dh dqYyw&HkqUrj vXykejs'ku ds fy, fodkl ;kstuk
dks fcuk fdlh mikUrj.k ds vuqeksfnr djrs gSa vkSj mls iwoksZDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 20 dh mi/kkjk ¼4½ ds
v/khu ;Fkk visf{kr jkti= esa izdfk'kr djrs gSA ,rn~}kjk uksfVl fn;k tkrk gS fd mDr fodkl ;kstuk
dh izfr dk;kZy; le; ds nkSjku fuEufyf[kr dk;kZy;ksa esa fujh{k.k gsrq miyC/k jgsxh] vFkkZr%&
1-
funs'kd]
uxj ,oa xzke ;kstuk foHkkx]
dLkqEiVh] f'keyk] fgekpy izns'k&171009-
2-
uxj ,oa xzke ;kstukdkj]
e.Myh; uxj ;kstuk dk;kZy;] dqYyw
ftyk f'keyk&171009-
3-
dk;Zdkjh vf/kdkjh]
Ukxjikfydk ifj’kn~ dqYyw] ftyk dqYywA
4-
lfpo]
Ukxj iapk;r HkqUrj] ftyk dqYywA
mDr fodkl ;kstuk bl vf/klwpuk ds jkti= esa izdk'ku dh rkjh[k ls izorZu esa vk,xhA
vkns”k }kjk]
Ekuh’kk uUnk
vfrfjDr eq[; lfpo ¼Vh0lh0ih0½A
3641
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
[AUTHORITATIVE ENGLISH TEXT OF THIS DEPARTMENT NOTIFICATION No. TCP-F(5)-
2/2017 SHIMLA, DATED 5.7.2017 AS REQUIRED UNDER CLAUSE (3) OF ARTICLE 348 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA].
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 5th July, 2017
No.TCP-F(5)-2/2017.—WHEREAS, the draft Development Plan for Kullu-Bhunter
Agglomeration of Kullu Valley Planning Area was published by the Director, Town and Country
Planning Department, Himachal Pradesh under sub-section (1) of section 19 of the Town and
Country Planning Act, 1977 (Act No. 12 of 1977) read with rule 11 of the Himachal Pradesh Town
and Country Planning Rules, 2014 vide Notice No. HIM/TP/PJT/D.P. Kullu-Bhunter/2004/Vol-
IV/16673-89 dated 18.11.2016 in the Rajpatra, Himachal Pradesh on 21st November, 2016 for
inviting objection(s) and suggestion(s), which were duly considered and modifications were made,
wherever required and same was submitted to the Government for approval on 11.04.2017;
NOW, THEREFORE, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 20
of the Act ibid, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to approve the Development Plan for
Kullu-Bhunter Agglomeration of Kullu Valley Planning Area, without any modification and the
same is hereby published in the Official Gazette as required under subsection (4) of section 20 of
the Act ibid. A Notice is hereby given that a copy of the said Development Plan is available for
inspection during office hours in the following offices, namely:—
1.
The Director,
Town and Country Planning Department,
Nagar Yojana Bhawan, Block No. 32-A, Vikas Nagar,
Kasumpti, Shimla-9.
2.
The Town and Country Planner,
Divisional Town Planning Office,
Kullu, District Kullu, Himachal Pradesh.
3.
The Executive Officer,
Municipal Council, Kullu,
District Kullu, Himachal Pradesh.
4.
The Secretary,
Nagar Panchayat Bhunter,
District, Kullu. H.P.
The said Development Plan shall come into operation from the date of publication of this
Notification in the official Gazette.
By order,
MANISHA NANDA
Addl. Chief Secretary (TCP).
3642
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
dk;kZy; fuokZpu vf/kdkjh dsUnzh; Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn fuokZpu {ksf=; vk;qosZfnd vLirky]
f”keyk&171002
vf/klwpuk
f”keyk&171009] 12 twu] 2017
la[;k-ds-fp-i-¼fuokZpu½&1@2017&23&55-&&eSa Mk0 jkt d`’.k i:Fkh] fuokZpu vf/kdkjh] dsUnzh;
Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn vf/kfu;e] 1975 dh /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ ds [k.M ¼d½ ,oa 7 esa iz)r
“kDfr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq;s fgekpy izns”k jkT; ls dsUnzh; Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn] ubZ fnYyh ds fy;s
vk;qosZfnd fpfdRlk if)r ls ,d vk;qsZosfnd lnL; ds fuokZpu gsrq fuEufyf[r fuokZpu dk;ZØe
vf/klwfpr djrk gwWa %&
Øekad
dk;ZØe
fnukad ,oa le;
1
rS;kj ernkrk lwfp;ksa dk izdk”ku
12-06-2017
2
ftyk vk;qZosfnd dk;kZy;ksa dks ernkrkvksa ds lwpukFkZ uksfVl dk
izs"k.kA
13-06-2017
3
rS;kj ernkrk lqfp;ksa ds lUnHkZ esa vkifRr;ka ntZ djokuk
01-07-2017 ls 06-07-2017
4
vkifr;ksa ij lquokbZ
07-07-2017
5
vfUre ernkrk lwfp;ksa dk izdk”ku
18-07-2017
6
Ukkekadu nkf[ky djus dh frfFk;kWa
19-07-2017 ls 22-07-2017
7
Ukkekadu i+=ksa dh laoh{kk
24-07-2017
8
Ukkekadu okfil ysus dh frfFk
01-08-2017
9
oS/k :i ls ukekafdr vH;fZFZk;ksa dh lwph dk iznZ”ku ,oa ljdkjh
jkti= esa izdk”ku A
02-08-2017
10
fuokZpu lkekxzh ds eqnz.k gsrw visf{kr le;
11-08-2017 rd
11
ernkrkvksa dks eri=ksa dk izs"k.k
14-08-2017 ls
12
fuokZpu vf/kdkjh )kjk ernkrkvksa ls eri=ksa dh izkfIr
13-09-2017 lk;a 5 ots rd
13
eri=ksa dh laoh{kk ,oa erx.kuk
14-09-2017 izkr% 11 ots ls
14
ifj.kke dh ?kks"k.kk
14-09-2017
vkns'k }kjk]
gLrk{kfjr!&
fuokZpu vf/kdkjh
dsUnzh; Hkkjrh; fpfdRlk ifj"kn fuokZpu
f”keyk&171002-
3643
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
OFFICE OF THE RETURNING OFFICER, INDIAN MEDICINE CENTRAL COUNCIL
ELECTION REGIONAL AYURVEDIC HOSPITAL, SHIMLA171002
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-9, the 12th June, 2017
No. CCIM (Election) HP/1/016-23-55.—I, Dr, Raj Krishan Pruthi, Returning Officer
(Election) Indian Medicine Central Council exercising powers vested in under clause (a) of Sub-
section (1) of Section 3 & 7 of the Indian Medicine Central Council Election Rules, 1975, hereby
frame and notify the Election Programme for the State of Himachal Pradesh to elect one member
for the Indian Medicine Central Council, New Delhi as follow:—
S.No.
Programme
Date and Time
1.
Publication of draft electoral rolls
12.06.2017
2.
Notice for calling upon electors after publication of
electoral rolls to be sent to All the Distt. Ayurvedic
Offices in H.P.
13.06.2017
3.
Filling of objections against draft electoral rolls.
01.07.2017 to 06.07.2017
4.
Hearing of objection
07.07.2017
5.
Publication of final electoral rolls
18.07.2017
6.
Filling of the Nomination Papers by the Candidates
for contest the election.
19.07.2017 to 22.07.2017
7.
Scrutiny of Nominations Papers
24.07.2017
8.
Withdrawal of nominations by the candidates
01.08.2017
9.
List of Valid candidates to be displayed as well as
published in Official Gazette.
02.08.2017
10.
Time required for printing the material
11.08.2017
11.
Ballot papers dispatched to the Voters
14.08.2017 onwards
12.
Ballot paper received back by Returning Officer
from the Voters.
13.09.2017 before 5, P.M
13.
Scrutiny/Counting of the Votes
14.09.2017 at 11. A.M
14.
Result declared after counting of the Votes
immediately.
14.09.2017
By order,
Sd/-
Returning Officer,
Indian Medicine Central Council Election
Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-171002.
3644
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
c vnkyr tukc Jh Kku pUn] rglhynkj ,oa lgk;d lekgrkZ izFke Js.kh]
bUnkSjk] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0
fely ua0 %
rkjh[k is'kh % 20&07&2017
Jherh jkds'k dqekjh iRuh Jh oyfcUnj flag iq= pquh yky] fuoklh MeVky] rglhy bUnkSjk]
ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0
- - izkfFkZ;kA
cuke
vke turk
fo"k;-&&izkFkZuk&i= tsj /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oe~ e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969-
izkfFkZ;k Jherh jkds'k dqekjh iRuh Jh oyfcUnj flag iq= pquh yky] fuoklh MeVky] rglhy
bUnkSjk] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0 us izkFkZuk i= izLrqr djrs gq, fuosnu fd;k gS fd esjh iq=h fiz;adk dh
tUe frfFk 26&10&1994 xzke iapk;r MeVky ds vfHkys[k esa ntZ u gS tksfd ntZ dh tk,A
vr% bl b'rgkj jkti= ds }kjk loZlk/kkj.k dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd mDr tUe iathdj.k
djus ckjs fdlh Hkh O;fDr dks dksbZ ,rjkt gks rks og vlkyru ;k odkyru fnukad 20&07&2017 dks
izkr% 10-00 cts vnkyr gtk esa mifLFkr gksdj viuk ,rjkt is'k dj ldrk gSA dksbZ ,rjkt is'k u
gksus dh lwjr esa tUe iathdj.k ds vkns'k ikfjr dj fn, tk,axsA
vkt fnukad 20&06&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr lfgr tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh
bUnkSjk] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&
c vnkyr tukc Jh txr jke] uk;c rglhynkj ,oa lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh]
bUnkSjk] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0
fely ua0 %
rkjh[k is'kh % 28&07&2017
Jherh d`".kk nsoh iRuh Lo0 Jh izdk'k pUn] fuoklh eksgVyh] rglhy bUnkSjk] ftyk dkaxM+k]
fg0 iz0
- - izkfFkZ;kA
cuke
vke turk
fo"k;-&&izkFkZuk&i= tsj /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oe~ e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969-
izkfFkZ;k Jherh d`".kk nsoh iRuh Lo0 Jh izdk'k pUn] fuoklh eksgVyh] rglhy bUnkSjk] ftyk
dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0 us izkFkZuk i= izLrqr djrs gq, fuosnu fd;k gS fd mlds ifr Jh izdk'k pUn iq= dqUt
yky dh e`R;q frfFk 18&09&2014 xzke iapk;r eksgVyh ds vfHkys[k esa ntZ u gS tksfd ntZ dh tk,A
vr% bl b'rgkj jkti= ds }kjk loZlk/kkj.k dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd mDr e`R;q iathdj.k
djus ckjs fdlh Hkh O;fDr dks dksbZ ,rjkt gks rks og vlkyru ;k odkyru fnukad 28&07&2017 dks
3645
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
izkr% 10-00 cts vnkyr gtk esa mifLFkr gksdj viuk ,rjkt is'k dj ldrk gSA dksbZ ,rjkt is'k u
gksus dh lwjr esa e`R;q iathdj.k ds vkns'k ikfjr dj fn, tk,axsA
vkt fnukad 20&06&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr lfgr tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh
bUnkSjk] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&
c vnkyr tukc Jh lq'khy dqekj] uk;c rglhynkj ,oa lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh]
bUnkSjk] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0
fely ua0 %
rkjh[k is'kh % 28&07&2017
1- Jh latho dqekj iq= Jh vorkj flag] fuoklh eydkuk] Mk0 ijky] rglhy bUnkSjk] ftyk
dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0A
2- iwtk jkuh iq=h Jh tks/k flag] fuoklh pd ehjiqj] Mk0 Qrsgiqj] rglhy eqdsfj;ka] ftyk
gksf'k;kjiqj] iatkc] gky iRuh Jh latho dqekj iq= Jh vorkj flag] fuoklh eydkuk] Mk0
ijky] rglhy bUnkSjk] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0
- - izkFkhZx.k
cuke
vke turk
fo"k;-&izkFkZuk&i= tsj /kkjk 8¼4½ fgekpy izns'k fookg iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1996-
izkFkhZx.k Jh latho dqekj iq= Jh vorkj flag] fuoklh eydkuk] Mk0 ijky] rglhy bUnkSjk] ftyk
dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0 o iwtk jkuh iq=h Jh tks/k flag] fuoklh pd ehjiqj] Mk0 Qrsgiqj] rglhy eqdsfj;ka]
ftyk gksf'k;kjiqj] iatkc] gky iRuh Jh latho dqekj iq= Jh vorkj flag] fuoklh eydkuk] Mk0 ijky]
rglhy bUnkSjk] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0 us izkFkZuk&i= izLrqr djrs gq;s fuosnu fd;k gS fd mlds vius
fookg dk iathdj.k frfFk 11&11&2016 xzke iapk;r lqjMoka ds vfHkys[k esa ntZ u gS tks fd ntZ fd;k
tk,A
vr% bl b'rgkj jkti= ds }kjk loZlk/kkj.k dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd mDr fookg iathdj.k
djus ckjs fdlh Hkh O;fDr dks dksbZ ,rjkt gks rks og vlkyru ;k odkyru fnukad 28&07&2017 dks
izkr% 10-00 cts vnkyr gtk esa mifLFkr gksdj viuk ,rjkt is'k dj ldrk gS dksbZ ,rjkt is'k u gksus
dh lwjr esa fookg iathdj.k ds vkns'k ikfjr dj fn;s tk,axsA
vkt fnukad 20&06&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr lfgr tkjh fd;k x;kA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh]
bUnkSjk] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0A
3646
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
c vnkyr uk;c rglhynkj ,oa lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh] gkjpfd;ka]
ftyk dkaxM+k ¼fg0 iz0½
Jh jkts'k Mksxjk iq= Jh lqns'k dqekj] fuoklh egky eusbZ [kkl] ekStk eusbZ] rglhy gkjpfd;ka]
ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0A
cuke
vke turk
fo"k;-&&izkFkZuk i= lsgr ukeA
Jh jkts'k Mksxjk iq= Jh lqns'k dqekj] fuoklh egky eusbZ [kkl] ekStk eusbZ] rglhy gkjpfd;ka]
us bl vnkyr esa izkFkZuk i= e; C;ku gYQh xqtkjk gS fd mldk uke jktLo vfHkys[k iVokj o`Ùk eusbZ
esa uke vt; dqekj gS tksfd lgh ugha gS lgh uke jkts'k Mksxjk iq= Jh lqns'k dqekj gSA
vr% bl b'rgkj jkti= ds ek/;e ls loZlk/kkj.k dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh O;fDr
dks dksbZ mtj o ,rjkt gks rks fnukad 24&07&2017 dks izkr% 10-00 cts is'k dj ldrk gS ckn is'kh
mtj o ,rjkt ugha lquk tk,xk rFkk jktLo vfHkys[k esa uke n#Lrh vt; dqekj mQZ jkts'k Mksxjk iq=
lqns'k dqekj ds vkns'k ns fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 27&06&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj o vnkyr eksgj ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
uk;c rglhynkj ,oa lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh Js.kh
gkfjpfd;ka] ftyk dkaxM+k ¼fg0 iz0½A
&&&&&&&&
c vnkyr Jh vfuy pkSgku] mi&e.Mykf/kdkjh ¼ukxfjd½ pkSiky] rglhy pkSiky]
ftyk f'keyk ¼fgekpy izns'k½
Jherh d`".kk ijlkbZd iRuh Jh Hkkxey ijlkbZd] xkao fjatV] ijxuk pUnyksx] xzke iapk;r
us:ok] rglhy pkSiky] ftyk f'keykA
cuke
¼1½ vke turk]
¼2½ iz/kku xzke iapk;r us:ok] rglhy pkSiky] ftyk f'keyk
fo"k;-&&izkfFkZ;k ds cPpksa dk uke o tUe&frfFk xzke iapk;r us:ok ds tUe iathdj.k jftLVj esa ntZ
djok, tkus ckjs fd v/khu /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oe~ e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969 ds vUrxZr
tUe iathdj.k djus ckjsA
gj [kkl o vke turk dks ctfj;k b'rgkj lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd izkfFkZ;k Jherh d`".kk
ijlkbZd us v/kksgLrk{kjh ds U;k;ky; esa ,d vkosnu&i= izLrqr fd;k gS fd mlus vius cPpksa dk uke o
tUe frfFk xzke iapk;r us:ok ds tUe iathdj.k jftLVj esa ntZ ugha djok;k gSa] vc izkfFkZ;k vius cPpksa
dk uke o tUe frfFk xzke iapk;r us:ok ds tUe iathdj.k jftLVj esa ntZ djokuk pkgrh gS] tksfd
fuEu izdkj ls gS %&
3647
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
Øe la[;k
uke
lEcU/k
tUe frfFk
1-
fuf[ky ijlkbZd iq=
21&02&1996
2-
m'khy ijlkbZd
iq=h
25&12&1997
vr% xzke iapk;r us:ok rglhy pkSiky dh turk dks ctfj;k b'rgkj lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd
;fn fdlh O;fDr dks mijksDr tUe iathdj.k ckjs dksbZ vkifÙk gks rks rkjh[k 17&07&2017 dks ;k blls
iwoZ vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj vnkyr vkdj viuh vkifÙk izLrqr djsa vU;Fkk vkosnu&i= ij tUe
iathdj.k vkns'k ikfjr djds lfpo] xzke iapk;r us:ok dks vkxkeh dk;kZUo;u gsrq Hkst fn;k tk;sxkA
vkt fnukad 17&06&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj lfgr vnkyr ls tkjh fd;k x;kA
eksgjA
vfuy pkSgku]
mi&e.Mykf/kdkjh ¼ukxfjd½]
pkSiky] rglhy pkSiky] ftyk f'keyk ¼fg0 iz0½A
&&&&&&&&
c vnkyr Jh eksgh jke pkSgku] dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh] us:ok]
ftyk f'keyk] fg0 iz0
Jh jes'k pUn iq= Jh lUr jke] fuoklh ekuxM] Mk0 FkaxkM] ftyk f'keyk] fg0 iz0
cuke
vke turk
fo"k;-&&tUe jftLVj esa cPpksa ds uke ntZ djus ckjs
gj [kkl o vke turk dks bl b'rgkj ds ek/;e ls lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd Jh jes'k pUn us
vnkyrs ,d vkosnu&i= izLrqr fd;k gS fd mlus vius iq= o iq=h dh tUe frfFk o uke dk bUnzkt
tUe jftLVj] xzke iapk;r fdj.k esa ntZ ugha djok;k gS ftls ntZ djokuk pkgrk gS] tks fd bl izdkj
ls gS%&
dkSloh dh tUe frfFk 15&04&2012
vr% xzke iapk;r fdj.k] rglhy us:ok] ftyk f'keyk] fg0 iz0 dh turk dks ctfj;k b'rgkj
lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh dks mijksDr iathdj.k ckjs dksbZ mtj o ,rjkt gks rks og viuk
mtj vlkyru ;k odkyru tSlh Hkh lwjr gks fnukad 28&07&2017 dks vnkyr gtk esa gkftj gksdj
is'k djsa fnxj lwjr esa vkosnu&i= esa tUe iathdj.k vkns'k ikfjr djds jftLVªkj] tUe ,oa e`R;q xzke
iapk;r fdj.k dks vkns'k ikfjr dj fn;s tk;asxsA
vkt fnukad 24&06&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh fd;k x;kA
eksgjA
eksgh jke pkSgku]
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]
us:ok] ftyk f'keyk ¼fg0 iz0½A
3648
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
c vnkyr Jh eksgh jke pkSgku] dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh] us:ok]
ftyk f'keyk] fg0 iz0
Jh eLr jke iq= Jh ine flag] fuoklh lkaMyh] Mk0 nsbZ;k] ftyk f'keyk] fg0 iz0
cuke
vke turk
fo"k;-&&tUe jftLVj esa cPpksa ds uke ntZ djus ckjs
gj [kkl o vke turk dks bl b'rgkj ds ek/;e ls lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd Jh eLr jke us
vnkyrs ,d vkosnu&i= izLrqr fd;k gS fd mlus vius iq= o iq=h dh tUe frfFk o uke dk bUnzkt
tUe jftLVj xzke iapk;r nsbZ;k esa ntZ ugha djok;k gS ftls ntZ djokuk pkgrk gS] tks fd bl izdkj
ls gS%&
jtr jkBkSj dh tUe frfFk 08&10&1996
vr% xzke iapk;r nsbZ;k rglhy us:ok] ftyk f'keyk] fg0 iz0 dh turk dks ctfj;k b'rgkj
lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh dks mijksDr iathdj.k ckjs dksbZ mtj o ,rjkt gks rks og viuk
mtj vlkyru ;k odkyru tSlh Hkh lwjr gks fnukad 28&07&2017 dks vnkyr gtk esa gkftj gksdj
is'k djsa fnxj lwjr esa vkosnu&i= esa tUe iathdj.k vkns'k ikfjr djds jftLVªkj] tUe ,oa e`R;q xzke
iapk;r nsbZ;k dks vkns'k ikfjr dj fn;s tk;asxsA
vkt fnukad 24&06&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh fd;k x;kA
eksgjA
eksgh jke pkSgku]
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]
us:ok] ftyk f'keyk ¼fg0 iz0½A
&&&&&&&&
In the Court of Shri Gian Sagar Negi, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Shimla (R),
District Shimla (H. P.)
Tsamchoe w/o Shri Ngawang Dorjee, r/o D-102, Tibetan Colony Panthaghatti, Tehsil &
District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.
Versus
[
General Public
. . Respondent.
Whereas Tsamchoe w/o Shri Ngawang Dorjee, r/o D-102, Tibetan Colony Panthaghatti,
Tehsil & District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh has filed an application along with affidavit in the
court of undersigned under section 13(3) of the Birth & Death Registration Act, 1969 to enter the
date of birth of her son named—Mr. Tenzin Thardo s/o Tsamchoe w/o Shri Ngawang Dorjee,
r/o D-102, Tibetan Colony Panthaghatti, Tehsil & District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh in the record
of Secy., Birth and Death, Municipal Corporation, Shimla.
3649
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
Sl.
No.
Name of the family member
Relation
Date of Birth
1.
Mr. Tenzin Thardo
Son
05-09-1980
Hence, this proclamation is issued to the general public if they have any objection/claim
regarding entry of the name & date of birth of above named in the record of Municipal Corporation,
Shimla may file their claims/objections on or before one month of publication of this notice in
Govt. Gazette in this court, failing which necessary orders will be passed.
Issued today on 03-07-2017 under my signature and seal of the court.
Seal.
GIAN SAGAR NEGI,
Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Shimla (R), District Shimla.
__________
In the Court of Shri Ajit Bhardwaj, H.A.S., Sub Divisional Magistrate Shimla (Urban),
District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh
Shri Tika Ram s/o Late Shri Durga Ram, r/o 6/1A, Dihar 1424 Bishan Solan, Tehsil and
District Solan, H.P.
. . Applicant.
Versus
General Public
.. Respondent.
Application under section 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969.
Whereas Shri Tika Ram s/o Late Shri Durga Ram, r/o 6/1A, Dihar 1424 Bishan Solan,
Tehsil and District Solan, H.P. has preferred an application to the undersigned for registration the
date of birth of his niece namely Radha (DOB 10-3-2000) d/o Shri Vishnu Kumar in the record of
Municipal Corporation, Shimla.
Therefore, this proclamation, the General Public is hereby informed that any person having
any objection for entry as to date of birth mentioned above, may submit his objection in writing in
this court on or before 30-7-2017 failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of date
and will be decided accordingly.
Given under my hand and seal of the Court on this 30th day of June, 2017.
Seal.
AJIT BHARDWAJ,
Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Shimla (Urban).
3650
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
In the Court of Shri Ajit Bhardwaj, H.A.S., Sub Divisional Magistrate Shimla (Urban),
District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh
Miss Nirmla d/o Shri Prem, r/o Servent Qtrs. Bye Pass Road Boileauganj, Shimla, Tehsil
and District Shimla, H.P.
. . Applicant.
Versus
General Public
.. Respondent.
Application under section 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969.
Whereas Miss Nirmla d/o Shri Prem, r/o Servent Qtrs. Bye Pass Road Boileauganj, Shimla,
Tehsil and District Shimla, H.P. has preferred an application to the undersigned for registration of
her date of birth i.e (DOB 10-5-1996) in the record of Municipal Corporation, Shimla.
Therefore, this proclamation, the General Public is hereby informed that any person having
any objection for entry as to date of birth mentioned above, may submit his objection in writing in
this court on or before 30-7-2017 failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of date
and will be decided accordingly.
Given under my hand and seal of the Court on this 30th day of June, 2017.
Seal.
AJIT BHARDWAJ,
Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Shimla (Urban).
__________
c vnkyr Jh eLr jke d';i] rglhynkj ,oa dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh] rglhy p<+xkao]
ftyk f'keyk] fg0 iz0
Jh ije lq[k iq= Jh gUlw] fuoklh fn;wph] rglhy p<+xkao] ftyk f'keyk] fg0 iz0
cuke
vke turk
izkFkhZ Jh ije lq[k iq= Jh gUlw] fuoklh fn;wph] rglhy pMxkao us bl U;k;ky; esa jktLo
dkxtkr eky esa uke dh n#Lrh gsrq ,d izkFkZuk&i= xqtkjk gS izkFkZuk&i= ds lkFk izkFkhZ us 'kiFk i=]
vk/kkj dkMZ dh udy layXu dh gS] nLrkostksa dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ dk uke egky dkxtkr
tMdksV esa xyrh ls ije lq[k dh txg ijek uUn ntZ gqvk gSA
vr% mDr uke n#Lrh djus ckjk loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn
fdlh O;fDr ;k fj'rsnkj dks mDr uke dh n#Lrh ckjk dksbZ mtj o ,rjkt gks rks og viuk ,rjkt
fnukad 20&07&2017 dks izkr% 10 cts vnkyr esa gkftj vkdj is'k dj ldrk gSA vU;Fkk jktLo fjdkMZ
esa izkFkhZ dk uke Jh ijek uUn dh txg ije lq[k n#Lr djus ds vkns'k ikfjr fd, tk;saxsA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]
p<+xkaoA
3651
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
In the Court of Shri Ajit Bhardwaj, H.A.S., Sub Divisional Magistrate Shimla (Urban),
District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh
Miss Shivanjli d/o Shri Sukh Dev Sharma, r/o House No. 52, Cinema Colony, Main Market
Bilaspur, Tehsil and District Bilaspur, H.P.
. . Applicant.
Versus
General Public
.. Respondent.
Application under section 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969.
Whereas Miss Shivanjli d/o Shri Sukh Dev Sharma, r/o House No. 52, Cinema Colony,
Main Market Bilaspur, Tehsil and District Bilaspur, H.P. has preferred an application to the
undersigned for registration of her date of birth i.e (DOB 3-2-1987) in the record of Municipal
Corporation, Shimla.
Therefore, this proclamation, the General Public is hereby informed that any person having
any objection for entry as to date of birth mentioned above, may submit his objection in writing in
this court on or before 3-8-2017 failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of date
and will be decided accordingly.
Given under my hand and seal of the Court on this 3rd day of July, 2017.
Seal.
AJIT BHARDWAJ,
Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Shimla (Urban).
__________
In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar,
District Mandi, H. P.
In the matter of :—
1.
Shri Yogesh Kumar s/o Ravi Singh, r/o V.P.O. Tandoo, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi,
H.P.
2.
Smt. Dipti d/o Shri Khem Singh, r/o Village Katipri, P.O. & Tehsil Padhar, District
Mandi, H.P.
. . Applicants.
Versus
General Public
Subject.—Application for the registration of Marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act,
1954.
Shri Yogesh Kumar s/o Ravi Singh, r/o V.P.O. Tandoo, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi, H.P.
and Smt. Dipti d/o Shri Khem Singh, r/o Village Katipri, P. O. & Tehsil Padhar, District Mandi,
3652
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
H.P. (at present wife of Shri Yogesh Kumar s/o Ravi Singh, r/o V.P.O. Tandoo, Tehsil Sadar,
District Mandi, H.P) have filed an application along with affidavits in the court of undersigned
under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have solemnized their marriage on
19-06-2017 according to Hindu rites and customs at their respective houses and they are living
together as husband and wife since then. Hence, their marriage may be registered under Special
Marriage Act, 1954.
Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who
has any objection regarding this marriage, can file the objection personally or in writing before this
court on or before 24-07-2017 after that no objection will be entertained and marriage will be
registered.
Issued today on 23rd day of June, 2017 under my hand and seal of the court.
Seal.
Sd/-
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Sadar, District Mandi (H.P.).
___________
In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar,
District Mandi, H. P.
In the matter of :—
1.
Shri Lalit Kumar s/o Durga Dass, r/o Village Gheru, P.O. Tarnoh, Tehsil Kotli, District
Mandi, H.P.
2.
Smt. Nisha Devi d/o Shri Kundan Lal, r/o Village Reoshi, P.O. Pangna, Sub-Tehsil
Pangna, District Mandi, H. P.
. . Applicants.
Versus
General Public
Subject.—Application for the registration of Marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act,
1954.
Shri Lalit Kumar s/o Durga Dass, r/o Village Gheru, P.O. Tarnoh, Tehsil Kotli, District
Mandi, H.P. and Smt. Nisha Devi d/o Shri Kundan Lal, r/o Village Reoshi, P.O. Pangna, Sub-
Tehsil Pangna, District Mandi, H. P. (at present wife of Shri Lalit Kumar s/o Durga Dass, r/o
Village Gheru, P.O. Tarnoh, Tehsil Kotli, District Mandi, H.P.) have filed an application along
with affidavits in the court of undersigned under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that
they have solemnized their marriage on 28-02-2017 according to Hindu rites and customs at their
respective houses and they are living together as husband and wife since then. Hence, their
marriage may be registered under Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who
has any objection regarding this marriage, can file the objection personally or in writing before this
court on or before 24-07-2017 after that no objection will be entertained and marriage will be
registered.
3653
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
Issued today on 23rd day of June, 2017 under my hand and seal of the court.
Seal.
Sd/-
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Sadar, District Mandi (H.P.).
___________
In the Court of Shri Raghav Sharma (I.A.S.), Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional
Magistrate, Chachyot at Gohar, District Mandi, H. P.
In the matter of :—
1.
Shri Jitender Kumar s/o Karam Singh, r/o Village Ghayan, P.O. Chail Chowk, Tehsil
Chachyot, District Mandi (H.P.)
2.
Smt. Pushpa Thakur d/o Hukam Singh, r/o Dhadwahan, P.O. Nerchowk, Tehsil
Chachyot, District Mandi (H. P.)
. . Applicants.
Versus
General Public
Subject.—Proclamation for the registration of Marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage
Act, 1954.
Shri Jitender Kumar and Smt. Pushpa Thakur have filed an application on 29-06-2017
along with affidavits in the Court of undersigned under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954
that they have solemnized their marriage on 28-02-2017 and they are living as husband and wife
since then and hence, their marriage may be registered under Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who
has any objection regarding this marriage, can file the objection personally or in writing before this
Court on or before 31-07-2017 after that no objection will be entertained and marriage will be
registered.
Issued today on 29-06-2017 under my hand and seal of the Court.
Seal.
Sd/-
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Chachyot at Gohar, District Mandi (H.P.).
3654
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Balh,
District Mandi, H. P.
In the matter of :—
1.
Shri Manish Kumar s/o Shri Ram Singh, Village Mandir Tanda, P.O. Lohara, Tehsil
Balh, District Mandi, H. P.
2.
Smt. Ramna Devi d/o Shri Ram Avtar Singh, r/o Village & P. O. Jhajra, Tehsil
Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P. at present wife of Manish Kumar s/o Shri Ram Singh,
Village Mandir Tanda, P.O. Lohara, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H. P. . . Applicants.
Versus
General Public
Subject.—Application for the registration of Marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act,
1954.
Shri Manish Kumar s/o Shri Ram Singh, Village Mandir Tanda, P.O. Lohara, Tehsil Balh,
District Mandi, HP and Smt. Ramna Devi d/o Shri Ram Avtar Singh, r/o Village & P. O. Jhajra,
Tehsil Nalagarh, District Solan, HP at present wife of Shri Manish Kumar s/o Shri Ram Singh,
Village Mandir Tanda, P.O. Lohara, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, HP have filed an application
along with affidavits in the court of undersigned under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954
that they have solemnized their marriage on 10-10-2016 according to Hindu rites and customs at
Village Mandir Tanda, P.O. Lohara, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, HP and they are living together
as husband and wife since then. Hence, their marriage may be registered under Special Marriage
Act, 1954.
Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who
has any objection regarding this marriage, can file the objection personally or in writing before this
court on or before 27-07-2017. After that no objection will be entertained and marriage will be
registered.
Issued today on 28th day of June, 2017 under my hand and seal of the court.
Seal.
Sd/-
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Balh, District Mandi (H.P.).
___________
In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Balh,
District Mandi, H. P.
In the matter of :—
1.
Shri Rajnish Kumar s/o Shri Raj Kumar, Village Balhi (Hawani), P.O. Rewalsar,
Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, HP.
3655
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
2.
Smt. Reeta Devi d/o Shri Biri Singh, r/o Village Kash, P.O. Gehra, Tehsil Sarkaghat,
District Mandi, H.P. at present wife of Shri Rajnish Kumar s/o Shri Raj Kumar,
Village Balhi (Hawani), P.O. Rewalsar, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, HP.
. . Applicants.
Versus
General Public
Subject.—Application for the registration of Marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act,
1954.
Shri Rajnish Kumar s/o Shri Raj Kumar, Village Balhi (Hawani), P.O. Rewalsar, Tehsil
Balh, District Mandi, HP. and Smt. Reeta Devi d/o Shri Biri Singh, r/o Village Kash, P.O. Gehra,
Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, HP at present wife of Shri Rajnish Kumar s/o Shri Raj Kumar,
Village Balhi (Hawani), P.O. Rewalsar, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, HP have filed an application
along with affidavits in the court of undersigned under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954
that they have solemnized their marriage on 8-12-2015 according to Hindu rites and customs at
Village Balhi (Hawani), P.O. Rewalsar, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, HP and they are living
together as husband and wife since then. Hence, their marriage may be registered under Special
Marriage Act, 1954.
Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who
has any objection regarding this marriage, can file the objection personally or in writing before this
court on or before 27-07-2017. After that no objection will be entertained and marriage will be
registered.
Issued today on 28th day of June, 2017 under my hand and seal of the court.
Seal.
Sd/-
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Balh, District Mandi (H.P.).
___________
c vnkyr Jh fgjk flag flej] dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh] rglhy ukSgjk/kkj]
ftyk fljekSj ¼fg0 iz0½
Jherh y{eh nsoh iRuh Jh j.knhi flag] fuoklh BBkjuk] rglhy ukSgjk/kkj] ftyk fljekSj] fg0iz0
- - izkfFkZuA
cuke
vke turk
- - izfroknhx.kA
mijksDr izkFkZuk&i= Jherh y{eh nsoh iRuh Jh j.knhi flag] fuoklh BBkjuk] rglhy ukSgjk/kkj]
ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0 us v/khu /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969 ds vUrxZr izLrqr
3656
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
djds izkFkZuk dh gS fd muds iq= ekul iqaMhj ftldh tUe frfFk 11&06&2013 gS] dk uke xzke iapk;r
ukSgjk/kkj ds fjdkMZ esa ntZ ugha djok;k x;k gSA ftls izkfFkZu vc ntZ djokuk pkgrh gSA
vc loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl lEcU/k esa ;fn fdlh O;fDr
dks mtj ;k ,rjkt gks rks og Lo;a vFkok vius izfrfuf/k }kjk fefr 24&07&2017 dks lqcg nl cts
vnkyr esa mifLFkr vkdj ,rjkt izLrqr djsa] clwjr nhxj ekul iaqMhj dk uke ,oa tUe frfFk dks ntZ
djus ds vkns'k tkjh dj fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 19&06&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]
rglhy ukSgjk/kkj] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&&
c vnkyr Jh vkj0 Mh0 gjuksV] dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh ¼rglhynkj½ ukgu]
ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0
Jh nhi pUn iq= Jh vej flag] fuoklh xzke dwu] Mk0 o xzke iapk;r jkek/kkS.k] rglhy ukgu]
ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A
cuke
vke turk
Jh nhi pUn iq= Jh vej flag] fuoklh xzke dwu] Mk0 o xzke iapk;r jkek/kkS.k] rglhy ukgu]
ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0 us v/khu /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969 ds vUrxZr
vkosnu&i= izLrqr djds izkFkZuk dh gS fd mldh iq=h vkLFkk Bkdqj dh tUe frfFk 01&01&2012 gS] tks
xzke iapk;r jkek/kkS.k] rglhy ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0 ds fjdkMZ esa ntZ ugha djokbZ xbZ gS] ftls
izkFkhZ vc ntZ djokuk pkgrk gSA
vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl lEcU/k esa ;fn fdlh O;fDr
dks mtj ;k ,rjkt gks rks og Lo;a vFkok vius izfrfuf/k }kjk fefr 25&07&2017 dks izkr% 10-00 cts
vnkyr esa mifLFkr vkdj izLrqr djsa clwjr nhxj vkLFkk Bkdqj iq=h Jh nhi pUn o Jherh lykspkuk
nsoh dh tUe frfFk 01&01&2012 dks ntZ djus ds vkns'k tkjh dj fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 24&06&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
vkj0 Mh0 gjuksV]
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh ¼rglhynkj½]
ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&&
c vnkyr Jh vkj0 Mh0 gjuksV] dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh ¼rglhynkj½ ukgu]
ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0
Jh jkt dqekj jk.kk iq= Jh gjh nÙk jk.kk] fuoklh xzke dkSaFkjksa] Mk0 o xzke iapk;r fcØeckx]
rglhy ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A
3657
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
cuke
vke turk
Jh jkt dqekj jk.kk iq= Jh gjh nÙk jk.kk] fuoklh xzke dkSaFkjksa] Mk0 o xzke iapk;r fcØeckx]
rglhy ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0 us v/khu /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969 ds
vUrxZr vkosnu&i= izLrqr djds izkFkZuk dh gS fd mldh iq=h eksfudk jk.kk iq=h jkt dqekj jk.kk o
Jherh Lusg yrk jk.kk dh tUe frfFk 02&08&1992 o fleju jk.kk iq=h jkt dqekj jk.kk o Jherh Lusg
yrk jk.kk dh tUe frfFk 21&02&1995 gS] tks xzke iapk;r fcØeckx rglhy ukgu] ftyk fljekSj]
fg0 iz0 ds fjdkMZ esa ntZ ugha djokbZ xbZ gS] ftls izkFkhZ vc ntZ djokuk pkgrk gSA
vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl lEcU/k esa ;fn fdlh O;fDr
dks mtj ;k ,rjkt gks rks og Lo;a vFkok vius izfrfuf/k }kjk fefr 25&07&2017 dks izkr% 10-00 cts
bl vnkyr esa mifLFkr vkdj izLrqr djas clwjr nhxj eksfudk jk.kk iq=h jkt dqekj jk.kk o Jherh Lusg
yrk jk.kk dh tUe frfFk 02&08&1992 o fleju jk.kk iq=h jkt dqekj jk.kk o Jherh Lusg yrk jk.kk dh
tUe frfFk 21&02&1995 dks ntZ djus ds vkns'k tkjh dj fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 24&06&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
vkj0 Mh0 gjuksV]
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh ¼rglhynkj½]
ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A
[[[
&&&&&&&&
c vnkyr Jh vkj0 Mh0 gjuksV] dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh ¼rglhynkj½ ukgu]
ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0
Jh lksukFk iq= Jh gjh jke] fuoklh xzke [kSjh] Mk0 o xzke iapk;r dkykvEc] rglhy ukgu] ftyk
fljekSj] fg0 iz0A
cuke
vke turk
Jh lksukFk iq= Jh gjh jke] fuoklh xzke [kSjh] Mk0 o xzke iapk;r dkykvEc] rglhy ukgu] ftyk
fljekSj] fg0 iz0 us v/khu /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969 ds vUrxZr vkosnu&i=
izLrqr djds izkFkZuk dh gS fd mldh tUe frfFk 06&06&1974 gS] tks xzke iapk;r dkykvEc] rglhy
ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0 ds fjdkMZ esa ntZ ugha djokbZ xbZ gS] ftls izkFkhZ vc ntZ djokuk pkgrk
gSA
vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl lEcU/k esa ;fn fdlh O;fDr
dks mtj ;k ,rjkt gks rks og Lo;a vFkok vius izfrfuf/k }kjk fefr 25&07&2017 dks izkr% 10-00 cts
vnkyr esa mifLFkr vkdj izLrqr djsa clwjr nhxj lkseukFk iq= gjh jke o Jherh tehjks nsoh dh tUe
frfFk 06&06&1974 dks ntZ djus ds vkns'k tkjh dj fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 24&06&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
vkj0 Mh0 gjuksV]
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh ¼rglhynkj½]
ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A
3658
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
c vnkyr Jh vkj0 Mh0 gjuksV] dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh ¼rglhynkj½ ukgu]
ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0
Jh xqjeSy flag iq= Jh ckcw jke] fuoklh xzke jkeiqj tVku] Mk0 o xzke iapk;r dkykvEc] rglhy
ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A
cuke
vke turk
Jh xqjeSy flag iq= Jh ckcw jke] fuoklh xzke jkeiqj tVku] Mk0 o xzke iapk;r dkykvEc] rglhy
ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0 us v/khu /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969 ds vUrxZr
vkosnu&i= izLrqr djds izkFkZuk dh gS fd mldh iq=h :ch nsoh dh tUe frfFk 13&01&1995 gS] tks xzke
iapk;r dkykvEc] rglhy ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0 ds fjdkMZ esa ntZ ugha djokbZ xbZ gS] ftls izkFkhZ
vc ntZ djokuk pkgrk gSA
vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl lEcU/k esa ;fn fdlh O;fDr
dks mtj ;k ,rjkt gks rks og Lo;a vFkok vius izfrfuf/k }kjk fefr 25&07&2017 dks izkr% 10-00 cts
vnkyr esa mifLFkr vkdj izLrqr djsa clwjr nhxj :ch nsch iq=h xqjeSy flag o Jherh xqjest dkSj dh
tUe frfFk 13&01&1995 dks ntZ djus ds vkns'k tkjh dj fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 24&06&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
vkj0 Mh0 gjuksV]
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh ¼rglhynkj½]
ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&&
c vnkyr Jh vkj0 Mh0 gjuksV] dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh ¼rglhynkj½ ukgu]
ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0
jktnqykjh iq=h Jh 'ke'ksj flag] fuoklh xzke ehjiqj xq:}kjk] Mk0 o xzke iapk;r f=yksdiqj]
rglhy ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A
cuke
vke turk
jktnqykjh iq=h Jh 'ke'ksj flag] fuoklh xzke ehjiqj xq:}kjk] Mk0 o xzke iapk;r f=yksdiqj]
rglhy ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0 us v/khu /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969 ds
vUrxZr vkosnu&i= izLrqr djds izkFkZuk dh gS fd mldh tUe frfFk 28&01&1971 gS] tks xzke iapk;r
f=yksdiqj] rglhy ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0 ds fjdkMZ esa ntZ ugha djokbZ xbZ gS] ftls izkFkhZ vc
ntZ djokuk pkgrh gSA
3659
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl lEcU/k esa ;fn fdlh O;fDr
dks mtj ;k ,rjkt gks rks og Lo;a vFkok vius izfrfuf/k }kjk fefr 25&07&2017 dks izkr% 10-00 cts
vnkyr esa mifLFkr vkdj izLrqr djsa clwjr nhxj jktnqykjh iq=h 'ke'ksj flag o Jherh t;eU=h dh
tUe frfFk 28&01&1971 dks ntZ djus ds vkns'k tkjh dj fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 24&06&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
vkj0 Mh0 gjuksV]
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh ¼rglhynkj½]
ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&&
c vnkyr Jh vkj0 Mh0 gjuksV] dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh ¼rglhynkj½ ukgu]
ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0
Jh cycUr flag iq= Jh pesy flag] fuoklh xzke mreokyk] Mk0 o xzke iapk;r dksyj] rglhy
ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A
cuke
vke turk
Jh cycUr flag iq= Jh pesy flag] fuoklh xzke mreokyk] Mk0 o xzke iapk;r dksyj] rglhy
ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0 us v/khu /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969 ds vUrxZr
vkosnu&i= izLrqr djds izkFkZuk dh gS fd mldh iq=h [kq'kh dh tUe frfFk 25&09&2012 gS] tks xzke
iapk;r dksyj] rglhy ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0 ds fjdkMZ esa ntZ ugha djokbZ xbZ gS] ftls izkFkhZ vc
ntZ djokuk pkgrk gSA
vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl lEcU/k esa ;fn fdlh O;fDr
dks mtj ;k ,rjkt gks rks og Lo;a vFkok vius izfrfuf/k }kjk fefr 25&07&2017 dks izkr% 10-00 cts
vnkyr esa mifLFkr vkdj izLrqr djsa clwjr nhxj [kq'kh iq=h cycUr flag o Jherh lykspuk nsoh dh
tUe frfFk 25&09&2012 dks ntZ djus ds vkns'k tkjh dj fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 24&06&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
vkj0 Mh0 gjuksV]
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh ¼rglhynkj½]
ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&&
c vnkyr Jh vkj0 Mh0 gjuksV] dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh ¼rglhynkj½ ukgu]
ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0
Jh jktnhi iq= Jh jkftUnz flag] fuoklh 660 xzke xq/kku] Mk0 o rglhy dyukSj] ftyk jksgrd]
gfj;k.kkA
cuke
vke turk
3660
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
Jh jktnhi iq= Jh jkftUnz flag] fuoklh 660 xzke xq/kku] Mk0 o rglhy dyukSj] ftyk jksgrd]
gfj;k.kk us v/khu /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969 ds vUrxZr vkosnu&i= izLrqr
djds izkFkZuk dh gS fd mldh iq=h fiz;k rksej dh tUe frfFk 23&01&2002 gS] tks uxjikfydk ifj"kn~
ukgu] rglhy ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0 ds fjdkMZ esa ntZ ugha djokbZ xbZ gS] ftls izkFkhZ vc ntZ
djokuk pkgrk gSA
vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl lEcU/k esa ;fn fdlh O;fDr
dks mtj ;k ,rjkt gks rks og Lo;a vFkok vius izfrfuf/k }kjk fefr 25&07&2017 dks izkr% 10-00 cts
vnkyr esa mifLFkr vkdj izLrqr djsa clwjr nhxj fiz;k rksej iq=h jktnhi o Jherh lUrks"k dh tUe
frfFk 23&01&2002 dks ntZ djus ds vkns'k tkjh dj fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 24&06&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
vkj0 Mh0 gjuksV]
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh ¼rglhynkj½]
ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&&
c vnkyr lgk;d lekgrkZ izFke Js.kh ¼rglhynkj½ ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0
fely ua0 % 12@2017
rkjh[k ejtqvk % 01&06&2017
Jherh ykteUrh iRuh Lo0 Jh bUnz flag] fuoklh e>ksyh] rglhy ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0
cuke
vke turk
vkosnu&i= uke n#Lrh bUnzkt okdk ekStk e>ksyh] rglhy ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0
Jherh ykteUrh iRuh Lo0 Jh bUnz flag] fuoklh e>ksyh] rglhy ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0 us
bl vnkyr esa vkosnu i= is'k fd;k gS fd iVokj o`r ukgu xzkeh.k ds jktLo dkxtkr eky esa vjkth
[kkrk [krkSuh ua0 89@118 esa ekfyd vjkth gSA jktLo dkxtkr esa izkfFkZ;k dk ue yTtk nsoh ntZ gS
tcfd iapk;r dh udy ifjokj jftLVj udy] oksVj dkMZ] vk/kkj dkMZ o jk'ku dkMZ esa izkfFkZ;k dk uke
yktoUrh iRuh Lo0 Jh bUnz flag gSA bl ckjs izkfFkZ;k us udy tekcUnh] iapk;r dh udy ifjokj
jftLVj] udy oksVj dkMZ] vk/kkj dkMZ o jk'ku dkMZ dh Nk;kizfr izLrqr dh gSA fely ds voyksdu ls
ik;k x;k fd mDr izkfFkZ;k dk uke dkxtkr eky esa n#:r fd;k tkuk mfpr gksxkA
vr% bl b'rgkj eqL=h equknh }kjk tulk/kkj.k dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ftl fdlh dks
izkfFkZ;k dk uke Jherh yTtk nsoh iRuh Lo0 Jh bUnz flag ds LFkku ij ykteUrh iRuh Lo0 Jh bUnz
flag] fuoklh e>ksyh] rglhy ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0 ds n#Lrh ckjs dksbZ vkifÙk gks rks fnukad
25&07&2017 dks izkr% 10-00 cts vlkyru o odkyru ukek bl vnkyr esa gkftj vkdj viuk i{k
izLrqr dj ldrs gSaA xSjgkftjh dh lwjr esa dk;Zokgh ,drjQk vey esa ykbZ tkosxhA ckn esa fdlh dk
dksbZ mtj@,rjkt ekU; u gksxkA
3661
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
vkt fnukad 24&06&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
lgk;d lekgrkZ izFke Js.kh]
rglhy ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&&
c vnkyr lgk;d lekgrkZ izFke Js.kh ¼rglhynkj½ ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0
fely ua0 % 06@2017
rkjh[k ejtqvk % 23&03&2017
Jh Hkw"k.k pUn mQZ Hkw"k.k flag iq= Jh vej pUn] fuoklh vkWoyhokyk xkMk ¼HksMhokyk½] Mk0
'kEHkqokyk] rglhy ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0
cuke
vke turk
jktLo fjdkMZ esa uke n#Lrh ckjs izkFkZuk i= okdk ekStk vkWoyhokyk xkMk] rglhy ukgu] ftyk
fljekSj] fg0 iz0A
Jh Hkw"k.k pUn mQZ Hkw"k.k flag iq= Jh vej pUn] fuoklh vkWoyhokyk xkMk ¼HksMhokyk½] Mk0
'kEHkqokyk] rglhy ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0 us bl vnkyr esa vkosnu i= is'k fd;k gS fd iVokj
o`r ukgu-III ds jktLo dkxtkr eky esa vjkth [kkrk [krkSuh ua0 2@2 ekStk vkWoyhokyk xkMk] rglhy
ukgu eas ekfyd vjkth gSA ftlesa izkFkhZ dk uke Hkw"k.k ntZ pyk vk jgk gSA fo|ky; izek.k i= ds
eqrkfcd Hkw"k.k pUn ntZ pyk vk jgk gS rFkk buds cPpksa ds fo|ky; izek.k i= esa Hkw"k.k flag ntZ pyk
vk jgk gSA izkFkhZ vc viuk uke Hkw"k.k pUn mQZ Hkw"k.k flag ntZ djokuk pkgrk gSA bl ckjs izkFkhZ us
vk/kkj dkMZ o fo|ky; izek.k i=ksa o tekcUnh dh Nk;kizfr izLrqr dh gSA
vr% loZ lk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ftl fdlh dks izkFkhZ dk uke
Hkw"k.k pUn mQZ Hkw"k.k flag iq= Jh vej pUn] fuoklh vkWoyhokyk xkMk ¼HksMhokyk½] Mk0 'kEHkqokyk] rglhy
ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0 ds uke n#Lrh ckjs dksbZ vkifÙk gks rks fnukad 25&07&2017 dks izkr% 10-00
cts vlkyru o odkyru ukek bl vnkyr esa gkftj vkdj viuk i{k izLrqr dj ldrs gSaA xSjgkftjh
dh lwjr esa dk;Zokgh ,drjQk vey esa ykbZ tkosxhA ckn esa fdlh dk dksbZ mtj@,rjkt ekU; u gksxkA
vkt fnukad 24&06&2017 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
lgk;d lekgrkZ izFke Js.kh]
rglhy ukgu] ftyk fljekSj] fg0 iz0A
3662
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
In the Court of Shri H. S. Rana, H.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate
Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh
NOTICE UNDER SECTION 16 OF SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT, 1954
In the matter of :
1.
Shri Anmol Rattan Sharma s/o Shri Ramesh Pal Sharma, r/o VPO Majra, Tehsil Paonta
Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P.
2.
Smt. Reeta Sharma d/o Shri Khaginder Singh, r/o Village Seri, PO Galanag, Tehsil &
District Solan, H.P.
Versus
General Public
Application for the registration of Marriage under Section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954
(Central Act) as amended by Marriage Laws (Amendment Act 01, 49 of 2001).
Shri Anmol Rattan Sharma s/o Shri Ramesh Pal Sharma, r/o VPO Majra, Tehsil Paonta
Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P. Smt. Reeta Sharma d/o Shri Khaginder Singh, r/o Village Seri, PO
Galanag, Tehsil & District Solan, H.P. have filed an application alongwith affidavits in this court
under section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 on dated 23-06-2017 stating therein that they have
solemnized their marriage on 17-10-2004 at their residence Village Majra, Tehsil Paonta Sahib and
they have living together as husband and wife ever since then. Hence notices are given to all
concerend and general public to this effect that if any body have any objection regarding the
registration of marriage duly solemnized on 17-10-2004 between Shri Anmol Rattan Sharma s/o
Shri Ramesh Pal Sharma, r/o VPO Majra, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P. Smt. Reeta
Sharma d/o Shri Khaginder Singh, r/o Village Seri, PO Galanag, Tehsil & District Solan, H.P. he
should file written objections and appear personally or through an authorized agent before this
court within 30 days from the date of issue of this notice. After expiry of the said period, the
marriage certificate would be issued to the applicants by this court.
Issued under my hand and office seal of this court on 23-06-2017.
Seal.
HARI SINGH RANA (HAS),
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur.
__________
In the Court of Shri H. S. Rana, H.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate
Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh
NOTICE UNDER SECTION 16 OF SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT, 1954
In the matter of :
1.
Shri Naveen Mishra s/o Shri Pitamber Dutt Mishra, r/o House No. 264 Pratap Khand
Vishwarkarm Nagar, Jhilmil Colony Delhi.
3663
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
2.
Smt. Deepti Maithani d/o Shri Rameshwar Prashad Maithani, r/o House No. 190 ward
No. 10 Devi Nagar, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmour, H.P.
Versus
General Public
Application for the registration of Marriage under Section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954
(Central Act) as amended by Marriage Laws (Amendment Act 01, 49 of 2001).
Shri Naveen Mishra s/o Shri Pitamber Dutt Mishra, r/o House No. 264 Pratap Khand
Vishwarkarm Nagar, Jhilmil Colony Delhi and Smt. Deepti Maithani d/o Shri Rameshwar Prashad
Maithani, r/o House No. 190 ward No. 10 Devi Nagar, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmour, H.P. have
filed an application alongwith affidavits in this court under section 16 of Special Marriage Act,
1954 on dated 24-06-2017 stating therein that they have solemnized their marriage on 01-12-2009
at their residence Taruwala, Paonta Sahib and they have been living together as husband and wife
ever since then. Hence notices are given to all concerend and general public to this effect that if any
body have any objection regarding the registration of marriage duly solemnized on 01-12-2009
between Shri Naveen Mishra s/o Shri Pitamber Dutt Mishra, r/o House No. 264 Pratap Khand
Vishwarkarm Nagar, Jhilmil Colony Delhi and Smt. Deepti Maithani d/o Shri Rameshwar Prashad
Maithani, r/o House No. 190 ward No. 10 Devi Nagar, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmour, H.P. he
should file written objections and appear personally or through an authorized agent before this
court within 30 days from the date of issue of this notice. After expiry of the said period, the
marriage certificate would be issued to the applicants by this court.
Issued under my hand and office seal of this court on 24-06-2017.
Seal.
HARI SINGH RANA (HAS),
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur.
__________
Before Shri Keshav Ram, Executive Magistrate-cum-(Tehsildar),
Kasauli, District Solan, H. P.
Case No. : 09/ 2017
Date of Institution
06-02-2017
Shri Dorja Phunchog son of Shri Chhulim Phunchog, resident of Village and P.O. Kaza,
Tehsil Spiti, District Lahaul Spiti, H. P.
. . Applicant.
Versus
General Public
..Respondents.
Application under Section 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969.
Shri Dorja Phunchog son of Shri Chhulim Phunchog, resident of Village and P.O. Kaza,
Tehsil Spiti, District Lahaul Spiti, H. P. has moved an application before the undersigned under
section 13(3) of Birth & Death Registration Act, 1969 alongwith affidavits and other documents
3664
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
stating therein that his uncle (Chacha) of late Miss Dolma Butit daughter of Late Shri Panchi Ram
Bhanu, Village and P.O. Kaza, Tehsil Spiti, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P. was died on 17-04-2014
near Bangala Colony, P.S. Dharampur, Tehsil Kasauli, District Solan but his date of death could
not be entered by the applicant.
Therefore, by this proclamation the general public is hereby informed that any person
having any objection for the registration of delayed date of death of Miss Dolma, may submit their
objections in writing in this court on or before 24-07-2017 at 10-00 AM failing which no objection
will be entertained after expiry of date.
Given under my hand and seal of the court on this 20th day of June, 2017.
Seal.
KESHAV RAM,
Executive Magistrate (Tehsildar),
Kasauli, District Solan, H. P.
__________
Before Shri Keshav Ram, Executive Magistrate-cum-(Tehsildar),
Kasauli, District Solan, H. P.
Case No. : 22/ 2017
Date of Institution
24-05-2017
Shri Prem Karki son of Shri Man Bahadure Karki, resident of Village & P.O. Jadla, Tehsil
Kasauli, District Solan, H. P.
. . Applicant.
Versus
General Public
..Respondents.
Application under Section 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969.
Shri Prem Karki son of Shri Man Bahadure Karki, resident of Village & P.O. Jadla, Tehsil
Kasauli, District Solan, H. P. has moved an application before the undersigned under section 13(3)
of Birth & Death Registration Act, 1969 alongwith affidavits and other documents stating therein
that his son Sourabh Karki was born on 07-09-1998 at Vilage Baniyara, P.O. Malera, Tehsil
Kasauli District Solan but his date of birth could not be entered by the applicant.
Therefore, by this proclamation the general public is hereby informed that any person
having any objection for the registration of delayed date of birth of Sourabh Karki, may submit
their objections in writing in this court on or before 24-07-2017 at 10-00 AM failing which no
objection will be entertained after expiry of date.
Given under my hand and seal of the court on this 20th day of June, 2017.
Seal.
KESHAV RAM,
Executive Magistrate (Tehsildar),
Kasauli, District Solan, H. P.
3665
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
fuokZpu foHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f”keyk&171009] 10 tqykÃ] 2017
Lka[;k% 3&1@2017&bZ-,y-,u-&II-&&Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx dh vf/klwpuk la[;k 479@2017
fnukad 10 tqykÃ] 2017 rnkuqlkj 19 vk’kk<+] 1939 ¼”kd~½ tks fd Hkkjr ds jk’Vªifr in ds fy,
fuokZpu ds lapkyu ds lEcU/k esa jk’Vªirh; vkSj mi&jk’Vªirh; fuokZpu fu;e] 1974 ds fu;e 7 ds
v/khu fnukad 14 twu] 2017 dks Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx }kjk t+kjh vfËklwpuk la[;k 479@2017¼2½ ls
lEcfU/kr gS] dks vaxzsth :ikUrj lfgr tulk/kkj.k dh lwpuk gsrq izdkf”kr fd;k tkrk gSA
vkns”k ls]
Ekq[; fuokZpu vf/kdkjh]
fgekpy izns”kA
&&&&&&&&&&
Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx
fuokZpu lnu] v“kksd jksM] ubZ fnYyh&110001
vf/klwpuk
fnukad % 10 tqykbZ] 2017
19 vk‘kk<+] 1939 ¼“kd~½
la0% 479@2017-&& ;r%] Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx us jk‘Vªirh; fuokZpu] 2017 ds lapkyu ds
laca/k esa jk‘Vªirh; vkSj mi&jk‘Vªirh; fuokZpu fu;e 1974] ds fu;e 7 ds v/khu fnukad 14 twu]
2017 dks t+kjh viuh vf/klwpuk la- 479@2017 ¼2½ ds }kjk ernku dk LFkku o fuokZpdksa dk lewg]
tks mu ernku LFkyksa ij ernku djus dk ik= gksxk] mudks vf/klwfpr dj fn;k gS( vkSj
;r%] mDr vf/klwpuk dh fVIi.kh esa ernku dh rkjh[k ls 10 fnu igys dh lhek ml :Ik es
fu/kkZfjr dh xbZ gS] ftlls igys dksbZ Hkh laln lnL;@fo/kku lHkk lnL; fdlh fo”ks’k ifjfLFkfr
ds dkj.k ;fn muds lewg ds fy, vf/klwfpr ernku&LFky ds vykok vU; ernku LFky ij
ernku djuk pkgrk gks rks mls fu/kkZfjr izi= esa Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx dks lh/ks vkosnu djrs gq,
lwfpr djuk gksxk( vkSj
;r%] vk;ksx us vR;Ur rkRdkfyd fLFkfr ds ekeys esa 10 fnu iwoZ lwpuk dh mi;qZDr “krZ
dks mnkj cukus dk fu.kZ; fy;k gS(
vr%] vc vk;ksx us ;g fu.kZ; fy;k gS fd mi;qZDr iz;kstu ds fy, vk;ksx esa ernku dh
rkjh[k ls 10 fnu iwoZ dh vof/k ds Ik“pkr~ Hkh izkIr vuqjks/k] ;fn dksbZ gS] rks vk;ksx }kjk ml ij
O;fDrxr ekeys dh fLFkfr ds vk/kkj ij fopkj fd;k tk ldrk gS vkSj vk;ksx ,sls laln
lnL;@fo/kku lHkk lnL; dks muds lewg ds fy, vf/klwfpr LFkku ds vykok vU; ernku LFky ij
ernku dh vuqefr ns ldrk gS] ;fn bl laca/k esa vko“;d O;oLFkk djus ds fy, iz;kZIr le; miyC/k
gksA
vkns“k ls]
ofjUnj dqekj]
iz/kku lfpoA
3666
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 10 tqykbZ] 2017@19 vk"kk<+] 1939
ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi-110001
NOTIFICATION
Dated, the 10th July, 2017
19 Ashadha, 1939 (Saka)
No. 479/2017.—Whereas, the Election Commission of India, in connection with conduct
of Presidential Election, 2017, has notified under Rule 7 of the Presidential and Vice-Presidential
Elections Rules, 1974, vide its Notification No. 479/2017(2) dated 14th June, 2017, the Place of
polling and Group of electors who will be entitled to vote at those places of poll; and
Whereas, in the Note to the said Notification, a limit of 10 days before the date of poll has
been fixed, before which any Member of Parliament/Member of Legislative Assembly, on account
of exigency for special circumstances, has to intimate if he desires to vote at place of polling other
than the one notified for his/her group, by directly applying to the Election Commission of India
in the prescribed format; and
Whereas, the Commission has decided to liberalise the above said stipulation of 10 days’
prior intimation in case of extreme urgent situation;
Now, therefore, the Commission has decided that the requests for the aforesaid purpose,
received in the Commission, even after 10 days before the date of poll, if any, may be considered
by the Commission based upon the circumstances of individual case and allow such Member of
Parliament/Member of Legislative Assembly to cast vote at place of polling other than the one
notified for his/her group, if there is sufficient time available for making necessary arrangements
in this regard.
By order,
VARINDER KUMAR,
Principal Secretary.
fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr
bysDVªkWfud gLrk{kfjr jkti=] oSclkbV http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in ij miyC/k gS ,oe~ vkWuykbu lR;kfir fd;k tk ldrk gS