jkti=] fgekpy izns'k
fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr
cq/kokj] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
fgekpy izns'k ljdkj
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 29th May, 2017
No.: 11-2/86Lab)ID/2017/Bilaspur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Bishnu Ram S/O Shri Sant Ram, R/O V.P.O. Sunhani, Tehsil Jhanduta,
District Bilaspur, H.P. and (i) the Employer/Manager, M/S GVK EMRI, J P Motors Building,
Village Anji, Barog Bye Pass Solan, District Solan, H.P. (ii) the Mission Director, National Health
Rural Mission, Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla (iii) the Employer/Managing Director,
80&jkti=@2017&19&07&2017
¼4003½
4004
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
M/S Adecco Flexione Workforce Solutions Private Limited, C-127, Basement Level, Satguru
Infotech, Phase-VIII, Industrial Area Mohali. Punjab (Contractor company) (iv)the Managing
Director, M/S Adecco India Private Limited, No. 2, NAL Wind Tunnel Road, Murugeshpalya,
Bangalore. (Corporate Office) on the issue of alleged termination of his services w.e.f. 06-02-2013.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether termination of the services of Bishnu Ram S/O Shri Sant Ram, R/O V.P.O.
Sunhani, Tehsil Jhanduta, District Bilaspur, H.P. w.e.f. 06-02-2013 by (i) the
Employer/Manager, M/S GVK EMRI, J P Motors Building, Village Anji, Barog Bye Pass
Solan, District Solan, H.P. (ii) the Mission Director, National Health Rural Mission,
Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla (iii) the Employer/Managing Director, M/S
Adecco Flexione Workforce Solutions Private Limited, C-127, Basement Level, Satguru
Infotech, Phase-VIII, Industrial Area Mohali. Punjab (Contractor company) (iv)the
Managing Director, M/S Adecco India Private Limited, No. 2, NAL Wind Tunnel Road,
Murugeshpalya, Bangalore. (Corporate Office), without complying with the provisions of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the
above employers/Management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 25th March, 2017
No.: 11-1/18 (Lab)ID/2017/Sunder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute exists between Shri Bodh Raj S/O Shri Narad Ram, R/O Village Gehar, P.O.
Nihri, Sub Tehsil Nihri, District Mandi, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest
Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his daily wages
services during year, 2014.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
4005
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Bodh Raj S/O Shri Narad Ram, R/O Village
Gehar, P.O. Nihri, Sub Tehsil Nihri, District Mandi, H.P. during year, 2014 (as alleged by
the workman) by the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar,
District Mandi, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 12th April, 2017
No.: 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2017/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
exists between Shri Chaman Lal S/O Shri Hari Singh, R/O Village Sanghan, P.O. Jugahan, Tehsil
Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. and the (i) the Employer/Manager, M/S GVK EMRI, J. P.
Motors Building, Village Anji, Barog Bye Pass Solan, District Solan, H.P. (Work Office) (ii) the
Employer, M/S Adecco India Private Limited, C-127, Basement Level, Satguru Infotech, Phase
VIII, Industrial Area, Mohali (Area Office) (iii) the Managing Director, M/S Adecco India Private
Limited, No. 2, NAL Wind Tunnel Road, Murugeshpalya, Bangalore(Corporate Office) on the
issue of alleged termination of his services w.e.f. 28-06-2013.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-
4006
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
“Whether termination of services of Shri Chaman Lal S/O Shri Hari Singh, R/O Village
Sanghan, P.O. Jugahan, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 28-06-2013 by (i)
the Employer/Manager, M/S GVK EMRI, J P Motors Building, Village Anji, Barog Bye
Pass Solan, District Solan, H.P. (Work Office), (ii) the Employer, M/S Adecco India Private
Limited, C-127, Basement Level, Satguru Infotech, Phase VIII, Industrial Area, Mohali
(Area Office) (iii)the Managing Director, M/S Adecco India Private Limited, No. 2, NAL
Wind Tunnel Road, Murugeshpalya, Bangalore. (Corporate Office), without complying
with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what
amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker
is entitled to from the above employers?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 20th January, 2017
No.:11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
exists between the Vice President/Secretary, Himachal Desi Sharab Karamchari Sangh, C/O CLBP,
Industrial Area Mehatpur, District Una, H.P. and (i) the Managing Director, Himachal Pradesh
General Industries Corporation Limited, Himrus Building, Cart Road, Shimla, H.P., (ii) the General
Manager, Himachal Pradesh General Industries Corporation Limited, Country Liquor Bottling
Plant, Government of Himachal Pradesh, Industrial Area, Mehatpur, District Una, H.P. and (iii)
Ram Singh Kanda & Sons, R/O Ward No. 9, V.P.O. Basdehra, Tehsil & District Una,
H.P.(Contractor) on the issue of miscellaneous demands.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether the demands raised by the Vice President/Secretary, Himachal Desi Sharab
Karamchari Sangh, C/O CLBP, Industrial Area Mehatpur, District Una, H.P. regarding
regularization of 45 contract workers (list enclosed) vide demand notice dated 23-08- 2013
(copy enclosed) to be fulfilled by (i) the Managing Director, Himachal Pradesh General
Industries Corporation Limited, Himrus Building, Cart Road, Shimla, H.P., (ii) the General
4007
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
Manager, Himachal Pradesh General Industries Corporation Limited, Country Liquor
Bottling Plant, Government of Himachal Pradesh, Industrial Area, Mehatpur, District Una,
H.P. and (iii) Ram Singh Kanda & Sons, R/O Ward No. 9, V.P.O. Basdehra, Tehsil &
District Una, H.P.(Contractor), is legal and justified? If yes, to what relief, service benefits,
from
which
date
the
above
workmen
are
entitled
to
from
the
above
employers/Management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 25th February, 2017
No.:11-5/99(Lab)ID/2017/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Devi Saran S/O Shri Ram Lal, R/O Village Chask, P.O. Saichu, Tehsil
Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. and Employer/Chief Executive Officer, M/S Shykka Co-operative
Society Limited, H.O. Chowk Dhanotu, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of alleged
termination of his services during December, 2014.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Devi Saran S/O Shri Ram Lal, R/O Village Chask,
P.O. Saichu, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during December, 2014 as alleged by the
workman by the Employer/Chief Executive Officer, M/S Shykka Cooperative Society
Limited, H.O. Chowk Dhanotu, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P., without complying
with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what
amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker
is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
4008
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 9th January, 2017
No.:11-5/99(Lab)ID/2016/Chamba.—Whereas
the
Labour
Officer-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Chamba, District Chamba has submitted a report as provided under Section-12(4) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri
Devi Saran S/O Shri Ram Lal, R/O Village Chask, P.O. Saichu, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba,
H.P. and the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D. Killar (Pangi), District Chamba, H.P.
as per demand notice dated 28-09-2015 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding his alleged
termination of services.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub- section-5
of Section-12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above
ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during year, 1996
before the above employer after delay of about 19 years.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble
High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for
adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal
Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following
issue/issues:—
“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Devi Saran S/O Shri Ram Lal, R/O
illage Chask, P.O. Saichu, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during year, 1996 by the
Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D. Killar (Pangi), District Chamba, H.P. who
has worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his industrial dispute vide demand
notice dated 28-09-2015 after delay of about 19 years, without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view
of working period and delay of about 19 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount
of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employer/management? ”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
4009
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 18th January, 2017
No.:11-1/18(Lab)ID/2016/Sunder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Devi Singh S/O Shri Keshav Ram, R/O Village Chalog, P.O. Karsog,
Tehsil Karsog, District Mandi, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Karsog Division, Karsog,
District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his services during year, 2003.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of services of Shri Devi Singh S/O Shri Keshav Ram, R/O Village
Chalog, P.O. Karsog, Tehsil Karsog, District Mandi, H.P. during year, 2003 by the Divisional
Forest Officer, Karsog Division, Karsog, District Mandi, H.P., without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back
wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the
above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 10th March, 2017
No.: 11-1/18 (Lab)ID/2017/Sunder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute exists between Shri Fateh Singh S/O Shri Ram Deyal, R/O Village Gehar, P.O.
Nihri, Sub Tehsil Nihri, District Mandi, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest
Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his daily wages
services during year, 2014.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
4010
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Fateh Singh S/O Shri Ram Deyal, R/O Village
Gaher, P.O. Nihri, Sub Tehsil Nihri, District Mandi, H.P. during year, 2014 (as alleged by
the workman) by the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar,
District Mandi, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 1st May, 2017
No.: 11-1/98(Lab)ID/2017/Hamirpur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Smt. Geeta Devi W/O Late Shri Mangal Singh, R/O Village Ropri, P.O.
Bhareri, Tehsil Bhoranj, District Hamirpur, H.P. and (i) the Employer/Branch Manager, Kamuna
Credit Co-operative Society Limited, V.P.O. Bhareri, Tehsil Bhoranj, District Hamirpur, H.P.(work
office) (ii) the Employer/Managing Director, Kamuna Credit Co-operative Society Limited,
Aishwarya Plaza, Space 2, Near Purania Chauraha, Alganj, Lucknow, U.P. (corporate office) on the
issue of alleged termination of her services w.e.f. 01-05-2016.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
4011
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
“Whether termination of the services of Smt. Geeta Devi W/O Late Shri Mangal Singh, R/O
Village Ropri, P.O. Bhareri, Tehsil Bhoranj, District Hamirpur, H.P. w.e.f. 01-05-2016 by
(i) the Employer/Branch Manager, Kamuna Credit Co-operative Society Limited, V.P.O.
Bhareri, Tehsil Bhoranj, District Hamirpur, H.P. (work office) (ii) the Employer/Managing
Director, Kamuna Credit Co-operative Society Limited, Aishwarya Plaza, Space 2, Near
Purania Chauraha, Alganj, Lucknow, U.P. (corporate office), without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled
to from the above employers/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 25th May, 2017.
No.: 11-1/18(Lab)ID/2017/Sunder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute exists between Smt. Geeta Devi W/O Shri Suresh Pal, R/O House No. 268/11,
Suhara Mohalla, P.O. Purana Bazar, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. and the Principal,
Himachal Dental College, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of
her services w.e.f. 08-07-2015.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Smt. Geeta Devi W/O Shri Suresh Pal, R/O House
No. 268/11, Suhara Mohalla, P. O. Purana Bazar, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f.
08-07-2015 (as alleged by the workman) by the Principal, Himachal Dental College, Sunder
4012
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
Nagar, District Mandi, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above
employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 5th April, 2017
No.: 11-1/18 (Lab)ID/2017/Sunder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute exists between Shri Govind Ram S/O Shri Hukam Chand, R/O Village Chhatar,
P.O. Podakothi, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket
Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his daily
wages services w.e.f. 31-10-2015.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Govind Ram S/O Shri Hukam Chand, R/O
Village Chhatar, P.O. Podakothi, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 31-10-
2015 (as alleged by the workman) by the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division,
Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
4013
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 31st March, 2017
No.:11-23/84(Lab)ID/2009/Mandi.—Whereas Shri Hem Chand S/O Shri Sawnu Ram,
R/O V.P.O. Kummi, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 31-08-
2008 regarding regularization of his services by the Executive Engineer, I. & P.H. Division Baggi,
District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer Mandi Zone, District Mandi,
H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the
course of conciliation proceedings, where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi Zone
was considered, examined and the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as appropriate
Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute regarding
regularization of his services w.e.f. 01-01-1998 and the dispute regarding regularization is covered
under Section-2K of the Act therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 19-07-
2010;
And whereas Shri Hem Chand S/O Shri Sawnu Ram agitated the above orders of declining
of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High Court of
Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 897/2011. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has
disposed off the CWP on dated 23-12-2016 and directed the respondents to consider the matter
afresh for referring the dispute raised by the workman-petitioner to the Labour Court. The operative
part of the said judgment is reproduced as follows:—
“13. Accordingly, present petition is allowed and impugned order dated 19-07-2010,
passed by the Learned Commissioner is quashed and set aside and Labour
Commissioner HP is directed to consider the matter afresh for referring the dispue
raised
by
the
workman-petitioner
to
the
labour
Corut
in
light
of
recommendation/detailed report submitted by the Labour Officer Mandi vide
communication dated 8.4.2010 as finds mention in communication dated 13.9.2010
sent by Labour Officer, Mandi (AnnexureP-8). Labour Commissioner on the basis of
report submitted by Labour Officer, Mandi, may refer the dispute to the Labour Court
for adjudication forthwith.”
Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated
15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial
Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section- 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for
legal adjudication:—
“Whether the alleged demand of regularization of services of Shri Hem Chand S/O Shri
Sawnu Ram, R/O V.P.O. Kummi, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 01-01-1998
before the Executive Engineer, I. & P.H. Division Baggi, District Mandi, H.P. who had
worked on daily wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 10
years vide demand notice dated 31-08-2008, without complying the provisions of the
4014
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If yes, to what relief, service benefits
and from which date the above workman is entitled to from the above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 14th March, 2017
No.: 11-1/18 (Lab)ID/2017/Sunder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute exists between Shri Hem Raj S/O Shri Adam Ram, R/O Village Gehar, P.O.
Nihri, District Mandi, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar,
District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his daily wages services during August,
2012.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted nder Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Hem Raj S/O Shri Adam Ram, R/O Village
Gehar, P.O. Nihri, District Mandi, H.P. during August, 2012 (as alleged by the workman)
by the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P.,
without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and
justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
4015
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 24th May, 2017
No.: 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2017/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Jagdish Chand S/O Shri Rajmal, R/O Village Sakraindhar, P.O.
Tanehar, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. and (i) the Employer/Manager, M/S GVK EMRI, J
P Motors Building, Village Anji, Barog Bye Pass Solan, District Solan, H.P. (Work Office), (ii) the
Mission Director, National Health Rural Mission, Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla (iii)
the Managing Director, M/S Adecco India Private Limited, No. 2, NAL Wind Tunnel Road,
Murugeshpalya, Bangalore. (Corporate Office) on the issue of alleged termination of his services
w.e.f. 25-05-2015.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of services of Shri Jagdish Chand S/O Shri Rajmal, R/O Village
Sakraindhar, P.O. Tanehar, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 25-05-2015 by (i)
the Employer/Manager, M/S GVK EMRI, J P Motors Building, Village Anji, Barog Bye
Pass Solan, District Solan, H.P. (Work Office), (ii) the Mission Director, National Health
Rural Mission, Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla (iii) the Managing Director, M/S
Adecco India Private Limited, No. 2, NAL Wind Tunnel Road, Murugeshpalya, Bangalore.
(Corporate Office), without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employers?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 5th April, 2017
No.: 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2017/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
exists between Shri Jarnail Singh, S/O Shri Kishan Singh, R/O V.P.O. Bangarh, District Una, H.P.
4016
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
and the General Manager, M/S Industrial Engineering Corporation, 51-B, Industrial Area,
Mehatpur, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his daily wages
services w.e.f. 24-06-2015.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Jarnail Singh, S/O Shri Kishan Singh, R/O
V.P.O. Bangarh, District Una, H.P. w.e.f. 24-06-2015 by the General Manager, M/S
Industrial Engineering Corporation, 51-B, Industrial Area, Mehatpur, Tehsil & District Una,
H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal
and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the18th April, 2017
No.: 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2017/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Jatinder Singh S/O Shri Devi Singh, R/O Village Dikryund, P.O.
Bhanjraru, Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, H.P. and the Branch Manager, H.P. Gramin Bank,
Branch Bhanjraru, Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his
services w.e.f. 29-01-2015.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
4017
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Jatinder Singh S/O Shri Devi Singh, R/O
Village Dikryund, P.O. Bhanjraru, Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, H.P. w.e.f. 29-01-2015
(as alleged by workman) by the Branch Manager, H.P. Gramin Bank, Branch Bhanjraru,
Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the
above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 1st March, 2017
No.:11-5/99(Lab)ID/2009/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Jeet Singh S/O Shri Param Dass, R/O V.P.O. Mindhal, Tehsil Pangi,
District Chamba, H.P. and the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division Killar, Tehsil Pangi,
District Chamba, H.P. on the issue of alleged regularization of his daily wages services w.e.f. 01-
01-2002.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether the demand raised vide demand notice dated 15-11-2007 (copy enclosed) by Shri
Jeet Singh S/O Shri Param Dass, R/O V.P.O. Mindhal, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P.
regarding regularization \of his daily wages services w.e.f. 01-01-2002 to be fulfilled by the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. is
legal and justified? If yes, to what relief, past service benefits, seniority and other
consequential service benefits the above workman is entitled to from the above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
4018
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 6th March, 2017
No.: 11-1/11(Lab)ID/2011/Nurpur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Jeet Singh S/O Shri Pradhana Ram, R/O Village Budha, P.O.Nana
Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Nurpur, District
Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his daily wages services during year, 2001.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Jeet Singh S/O Shri Pradhana Ram, R/O
Village Budha, P.O. Nana Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 2001 (as alleged by the
workman) by the Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P.,
without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and
justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 18th January, 2017
No.:11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Joginder Singh S/O Shri Bidhu Ram,
R/O V.P.O. Sadwan, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated nil
received in Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 13-06-2011 regarding his illegal termination
from the services by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra,
H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.The Labour
Officercum- Conciliation Officer Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial
dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings,
4019
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the
Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kangra at
Dharamshala was considered, examined and the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as
appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a
belated stage of more than 20 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order
dated 31-08-2013;
And whereas Shri Joginder Singh S/O Shri Bidhu Ram agitated the above orders of
declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 1258/2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal
Pradesh has disposed off the CWP on dated 15-06-2016 and directed the respondents to consider
the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by the
Hon’ble High Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh
State Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as
follows:—
“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider
the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision
within eight weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4.
The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any.”
Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IVLoose, Dated 15th
February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section- 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial
Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for
legal adjudication:—
“Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Joginder Singh S/O Shri Bidhu Ram,
R/O V.P.O. Sadwan, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990 by (i) the
Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive
Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. who had worked on daily
wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 20 years vide demand
notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 13-06-2011,
without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and
justified? If not, keeping in view delay of more than 20 years in raising the industrial
dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
4020
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 28th March, 2017
No.: 11-2/86(Lab)ID/2017/Bilaspur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Smt. Mamta Kumari, W/O Shri Ravi Kumar, R/O Village Soi, Tehsil
Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, H.P. and the Managing Director, M/S Vyas Hospital Kothi Chowk,
P.O. Chandpur, District Bilsapur, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of her daily wages
services w.e.f. 16-11-2015.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Smt. Mamta Kumari, W/O Shri Ravi Kumar, R/O
Village Soi, Tehsil Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, H.P. w.e.f. 16-11-2015 by the Managing
Director, M/S Vyas Hospital Kothi Chowk, P.O. Chandpur, District Bilaspur, H.P., without
complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not,
what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is
entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 25th February, 2017
No.:11-5/99(Lab)ID/2015/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Mohinder Kumar S/O Shri Prem Lal, R/O Village Jukhrari, P.O.
Bhadian Kothi, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. and (i) the Principal, Government Senior
Secondary School, Karian, District Chamba, H.P. (ii) The District Project Officer, SSA/RMSA
District Chamba, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his services w.e.f. 01-11-2012.
4021
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Mohinder Kumar S/O Shri Prem Lal, R/O
Village Jukhrari, P.O. Bhadian Kothi, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. w.e.f. 01-11-2012 as
alleged by the workman by (i) the Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Karian,
District Chamba, H.P. (ii) The District Project Officer, SSA/RMSA District Chamba, H.P.,
without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and
justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 12th April, 2017
No.: 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2017/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
exists between Shri Mohinder Singh S/O Shri Kewal Singh, R/O V.P.O. DehlanMohalla Budu,
Tehsil & District Una, H.P. and the Managing Director, M/S Froza Innovations Plot No. 38,
Industrial Area Mehatpur, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his
services w.e.f. 14-10-2015.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
4022
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Mohinder Singh S/O Shri Kewal Singh, R/O
V.P.O. DehlanMohalla Budu, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. w.e.f. 14-10-2015 by the
Managing Director, M/S Froza Innovations Plot No. 38, Industrial Area Mehatpur, Tehsil &
District Una, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 14th March, 2017
No.: 11-1/18 (Lab)ID/2017/Sunder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute exists between Shri Narender Kumar S/O Shri Luharu Ram, R/O Village Gaher,
P.O. Nihri, Sub Tehsil Nihri, District Mandi, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest
Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his daily wages
services during October, 2013.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Narender Kumar S/O Shri Luharu Ram, R/O
Village Gaher, P.O. Nihri, Sub Tehsil Nihri, District Mandi, H.P. during year, 2014 (as alleged by
the workman) by the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District
Mandi, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal
and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation
the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
4023
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the20th January, 2017
No.:11-1/18(Lab)ID/2016/Sunder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Narpat Ram S/O Shri Mani Ram, R/O Village Saroni, P.O. Jarol Tehsil
Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division,
Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of alleged time to time termination of his services
during year, 2002 to year, 2011.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether time to time termination of services of Shri Narpat Ram S/O Shri Mani Ram, R/O
Village Saroni, P.O. Jarol Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. during year, 2002 to
year, 2011 by the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District
Mandi, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is
legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 10th March, 2017
No.: 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2012/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Nek Raj S/O Shri Rumalo, R/O V.P.O. Manhuta, Tehsil Bhattiyat,
District Chamba, H.P. and the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba,
H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his daily wages services during year, 2002.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
4024
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Nek Raj S/O Shri Rumalo, R/O V.P.O.
Manhuta, Tehsil Bhattiyat, District Chamba, H.P. during year, 2000 (as alleged by the
workman) by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P.,
without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and
justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 10th March, 2017
No.: 11-1/18 (Lab)ID/2017/Sunder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute exists between Shri Pawan Kumar S/O Shri Durga Dass, R/O Village Koon, P.O.
Balag, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest
Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his daily wages
services during October, 2013.
As per the report under sectio?n 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Pawan Kumar S/O Shri Durga Dass, R/O
Village Koon, P.O. Balag, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. during October, 2013
(as alleged by the workman) by the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder
4025
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
Nagar, District Mandi, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 9th January, 2017
No.:11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Mandi.—Whereas
the
Labour
Officer-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Mandi has submitted a report as provided under Section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri Pawan Kumar S/O
Shri Badri Dutt, R/O Village Tandoh, P.O. Rissa, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. and (i) the
Engineer-in- Chief, H.P.P.W.D. Nirman Bhawan, Shimla, District Shimla, H.P. (ii) the Executive
Engineer, Sarkaghat Division, H.P.P.W.D., District Mandi, H.P. as per demand notice dated 09-11-
2015 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding his alleged termination of services.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub- section-5
of Section-12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above
ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services w.e.f. 01-01-2000
before the above employer after delay of more than 15 years.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble
High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for
adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal
Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following
issue/issues:—
“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Pawan Kumar S/O Shri Badri Dutt,
R/O Village Tandoh, P.O. Rissa, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 01-01- 2000
by (i) the Engineer-in-Chief, H.P.P.W.D. Nirman Bhawan, Shimla, District Shimla, H.P. (ii)
Executive Engineer, Sarkaghat Division, H.P.P.W.D., District Mandi, H.P. who has worked
4026
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised her industrial dispute vide demand notice
dated 09-11-2015 after delay of more than 15 years, without complying with the provisions
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of
working period during year 1999 for 157 days and delay of more than 15 years in raising
the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers/management? ”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 10th March, 2017
No.: 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2009/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Pyar Singh S/O Shri Jeeto Ram, R/O Village Bhela, P.O. Sahoo, Tehsil
& District Chamba, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Chamba Forest Division, District
Chamba, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his daily wages services during year, 2008.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Pyar Singh S/O Shri Jeeto Ram, R/O Village
Bhela, P.O. Sahoo, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. during year, 2008 as alleged by the
workman by the Divisional Forest Officer, Chamba Forest Division, District Chamba, H.P.,
without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and
justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
4027
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 25th February, 2017
No.:11-5/99(Lab)ID/2017/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Raj Kumar S/O Shri Lekh Chand, R/O V.P.O. Purthi, Tehsil Killar,
Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. and Employer/Chief Executive Officer, M/S Shykka Co-operative
Society Limited, H.O. Chowk Dhanotu, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of alleged
termination of his services during December, 2014.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Raj Kumar S/O Shri Lekh Chand, R/O V.P.O.
Purthi, Tehsil Killar, Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during December, 2014 as alleged by the
workman by the Employer/Chief Executive Officer, M/S Shykka Cooperative Society
Limited, H.O. Chowk Dhanotu, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P., without complying
with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what
amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker
is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 25th March, 2017
No.: 11-1/18 (Lab)ID/2016/Sunder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute exists between Shri Rajinder Kumar S/O Shri Khub Ram, R/O Village Maihira,
P.O. Balag, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket
Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of alleged time to time termination
of his daily wages services during February, 2001 to year, 2012.
4028
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether time to time termination of the services of Shri Rajinder Kumar S/O Shri Khub
Ram, R/O Village Maihira, P.O. Balag, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. during during
February, 2001 to year, 2012 by the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder
Nagar, District Mandi, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 8th March, 2017
No.: 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2009/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Rakesh S/O Shri Bal Mukund, R/O V.P.O. Rakh, Tehsil & District
Chamba, H.P. and the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., (B&R) Division, Bharmour, Chamba,
District Chamba, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his daily wages services during April,
2001.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Rakesh S/O Shri Bal Mukund, R/O V.P.O.
Rakh, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. during April, 2001 (as alleged by the workman) by
4029
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., (B&R) Division, Bharmour, Chamba, District
Chamba, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947,
is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 20th January, 2017
No.:11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Smt. Raksha Devi W/O Late Shri Ishwar Dass, R/O Ward No. 8, College
Road, P.O., Tehsil & District Kangra, H.P. and the Principal, Dayanand Anglo Vedic College,
Kangra, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged regularization of her services.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether the demand of Smt. Raksha Devi W/O Late Shri Ishwar Dass, R/O Ward No. 8,
College Road, P.O., Tehsil & District Kangra, H.P. regarding regularization of her daily
wages services as per Government Policy after completion of 8 years continuous service to
be fulfilled by the Principal, Dayanand Anglo Vedic College Kangra, District Kangra, H.P.,
is legal and justified? If yes, to what relief, service benefits above workman is entitled to
from the above employer/Management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
4030
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 25th February, 2017
No.:11-1/7(Lab)ID/2014/Joginder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
exists between Shri Ramesh Kumar S/O Shri Mast Ram, R/O Village Chhapru, P.O. Bassi, Tehsil Joginder
Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. and Resident Engineer, H.P.S.E.B. Limited, Bassi Power House, Joginder
Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of alleged time to time termination of his services w.e.f. 07-10-1996
to 25-03-1997.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not
succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub
section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally
adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh
vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested
under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute
is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on
the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether time to time termination of the services of Ramesh Kumar S/O Shri Mast Ram, R/O
Village Chhapru, P.O. Bassi, Tehsil Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 07-10-1996 to 25-
03-1997 by the Resident Engineer, H.P.S.E.B. Limited, Bassi Power House, Joginder Nagar, District
Mandi, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal
and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation
the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 25th February, 2017
No.:11-5/99(Lab)ID/2017/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists
between Shri Rattan Chand S/O Shri Gurdial, R/O Village Shoon, P.O. Udeen, Tehsil Pangi, District
Chamba, H.P. and Employer/Chief Executive Officer, M/S Shykka Co-operative Society Limited, H.O.
Chowk Dhanotu, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his services
during December, 2014.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not
succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub
section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally
adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh
vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested
under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute
is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on
the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
4031
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Rattan Chand S/O Shri Gurdial, R/O Village Shoon,
P.O. Udeen, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during December, 2014 as alleged by the workman
by the Employer/Chief Executive Officer, M/S Shykka Co-operative Society Limited, H.O. Chowk
Dhanotu, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority,
past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 21st January, 2017
No.:11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists
between Shri Rattan Lal S/O Shri Tota Ram, R/O Village Trihwin, P.O. Jarol, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District
Mandi, H.P. and 9 others (list enclosed) and (i) the Managing Director, H.P. Horticulture Produce Marketing
& Processing Corporation Limited, Nigam Vihar, Shimla (Principal Employer) (ii) the Deputy General
Manager, H.P. Horticulture Produce marketing & Processing Corporation Limited, Fruit Processing Plant,
Jarol, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. and (iii) Shri Ramesh Kumar, S/O Shri Godavar Ram, R/O
V.P.O. Jarol, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. (Contractor) on the issue of miscellaneous demands.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not
succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub
section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally
adjudicated by the Labour
Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh
vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested
under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute
is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on
the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:-
“Whether miscellaneous demands raised vide demand notices dated 29-06-2015 and 20-10-2015
(copies enclosed) by Shri Rattan Lal S/O Shri Tota Ram, R/O Village Trihwin, P.O. Jarol, Tehsil Sunder
Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. and 9 others (list enclosed) to be fulfilled by (i) the Managing Director, H.P.
Horticulture Produce Marketing & Processing Corporation Limited, Nigam Vihar, Shimla (Principal
Employer) (ii) the Deputy General Manager, H.P. Horticulture Produce marketing & Processing Corporation
Limited, Fruit Processing Plant, Jarol, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. and (iii) Shri Ramesh
Kumar, S/O Shri Godavar Ram, R/O V.P.O. Jarol, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. (Contractor)
are legal, justified and maintainable? If yes, what relief and benefits the above workers are entitled to by the
above employers/Management?”
By order,
SD/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LAW DEPARTMENT
NOTICE
Shimla-2, the 18th July, 2017
No. LLR-E(9)- 1/ 2017-Leg.—Whereas, the following Advocates of Districts Mandi and
Solan H.P. have applied for appointment of Public Notary in the places mentioned against their
names of their respective Districts under rule 4 of the Notaries Rules, 1956:—
4032
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 tqykbZ] 2017@28 vk"kk<+] 1939
Sr. No.
Name of Advocate
Area for which they
applied for appointment as
Notary
1. Sh. Santosh Kumar, Advocate
S/o Late Shri Bansi Lal, R/o Village & PO Giun, Sub-
Tehsil Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P.
Sub-Division Dharampur
2. Ms. Priyanka Arya, Advocate
S/o Sh. Shahi Ram Arya,
R/o Arya Niwas, Shakti Nagar, Jaunaji Road Solan,
Tehsil and District Solan, H.P.
Sub-Division Solan
Therefore, I undersigned in exercise of the power conferred vide Government Notification
No. LLR-A (2)-1/2014-Leg. dated 1st July, 2017, hereby issue notice under rule 6 of the Notaries
Rules, 1956, for the information of general public for inviting objections, if any, within a period of
ten days from the date of publication of this notice in Rajpatra, H.P. against their appointment as
Notary Public in the places mentioned against their names of their respective Districts.
By order,
Sd/-
(Competent Authority),
DLR-cum-Deputy Secretary (Law-English).
fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr
bysDVªkWfud gLrk{kfjr jkti=] oSclkbV http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in ij miyC/k gS ,oe~ vkWuykbu lR;kfir fd;k tk ldrk gS