jkti=] fgekpy izns'k

fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr

ohjokj] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

fgekpy izns'k ljdkj

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 30th May, 2016

No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute

exists between Shri Bhajan Singh s/o Shri Mangal Singh, c/o Shri R.K. Singh Parmar, General

Secretary, Pb. INTUC, L-211, Brari, P.O. Partap Nagar, Tehsil Nangal, District Ropar, Punjab and

Managing Director, M/s Arvind Talwar Machine Tools (P) Limited, V.P.O. Nangal Khurad, Tehsil

Haroli, District Una, H.P.on the issue of alleged termination from services w.e.f. 01-07-2014 (as

alleged by workman).

93&jkti=@2017&3&08&2017

¼4763½

4764

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that t his

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per

power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted

under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether termination of the services of Shri Bhajan Singh s/o Shri Mangal Singh, c/o Shri

R.K. Singh Parmar, General Secretary, Pb. INTUC, L-211, Brari, P.O. Partap Nagar, Tehsil

Nangal, District Ropar, Punjab w.e.f. 01-07-2014 (as alleged by workman) by the Managing

Director, M/s Arvind Talwar Machine Tools (P) Limited, V.P.O. Nangal Khurad, Tehsil

Haroli, District Una, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service

benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 18th May, 2016

No. 11-1/18(Lab)ID/2016/Sunder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute exists between Shri Chet Ram s/o Shri Atma Ram, r/o V.P.O. Balag, District Mandi, H.P.

and the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the

issue of alleged time to time termination of his services during September, 1998 to October, 2009.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under sub section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per

power vested under Sub Section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted

under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether time to time termination of the services of Shri Chet Ram s/o Shri Atma Ram,

R/O V.P.O. Balag, District Mandi, H.P. during September, 1998 to October, 2009 by the

Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P.,

4765

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and

justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and

compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 30th May, 2016

No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute exists between Shri Des Raj s/o Shri Phoolan Ram, r/o V.P.O. Kotpalhari, Tehsil Nurpur,

District Kangra, H.P. and (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District

Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra,

H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services as daily wages beldar during November,

1982.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February 2014 and as per

power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted

under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Des Raj s/o Shri Phoolan Ram, r/o

V.P.O. Kotpalhari, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during November, 1982 by (i) the

Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii) the

Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., without

complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by workman,

is legal and justified; whereas he has raised the industrial dispute vide demand notice dated

26-11-2013 after lapse of more than 14 years. If not, keeping in view delay of more than 14

years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service

benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner.

4766

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 12th May, 2016

No. 11-1/11(Lab)ID/2016/Nurpur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute exists between Shri Dev Raj s/o Shri Achar Singh, r/o Village Nanglahar, P.O. Geora,

Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. and the Managing Director, M/s Kwality Pharmaceuticals

Private Limited, Industrial Area, Plot No. 1, Raja Ka Bag, Jassur, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra,

H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his services w.e.f. 28-08-2014 (as alleged by workman).

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per

power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted

under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether termination of the services of Shri Dev Raj s/o Shri Achar Singh, r/o Village

Nanglahar, P.O. Geora, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 28-08-2014 (as alleged

by workman) by the Managing Director, M/s Kwality Pharmaceuticals Private Limited,

Industrial Area, Plot No. 1, Raja Ka Bag, Jassur, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P.,

without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and

justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and

compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 30th May, 2016

No. 11-1/18(Lab) ID/2016/Sunder Nagar.—Whereas the Labour Inspector-cum-

Conciliation Officer, Sunder Nagar has submitted a report as provided under Section-12(4) of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri

Devender Kumar s/o Shri Mani Ram, r/o Village Nalu, P.O. Jaidevi, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District

Mandi, H.P. and the Senior Executive Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B. Limited Sunder

Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. as per demand notice dated 25-03-2013 submitted by the said ex-

worker regarding his termination of services.

4767

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that

during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and

amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts

for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said

dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial

dispute.

Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided uder sub-section 5 of

Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above ex-

worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services w.e.f. 01-12-1998

before the above employer after delay of more than 14 years and has worked only from 08-10-1990

to 30-11-1998 respectively.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as

per power vested under sub-section 1 of Section-10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,

constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Devender Kumar s/o Shri Mani Ram,

r/o Village Nalu, P.O. Jaidevi, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 01-12-1998

by the Senior Executive Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B. Limited Sunder Nagar,

District Mandi, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act,

1947, as alleged by workman, is legal and justified; whereas he has raised the industrial

dispute vide demand notice dated 25-03-2013 after lapse of more than 14 years. If not,

keeping in view delay of more than 14 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount

of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is

entitled to from the above employer?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 29th May, 2016

No.: 11-1/18(Lab)ID/2016/Sunder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an

industrial dispute exists between Shri Ghanshyam s/o Shri Tek Chand, r/o Village Bhakha, P.O.

Nihari, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest

Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of alleged time to time termination of his

services during May, 2010 to June, 2014.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

4768

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per

power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted

under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether time to time termination of the services of Shri Ghanshyam s/o Shri Tek Chand,

R/O Village Bhakha, P.O. Nihari, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. during May, 2010 to

June, 2014 by the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District

Mandi, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is

legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and

compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 9th May, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2016/Chamba.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation

Officer, Chamba has submitted a report as provide d under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Smt. Guddi Devi W/O Shri

Shambhu Ram, r/o Village Thandal, P.O. Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. and the

Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D./I.&P.H., Killar (Pangi), District Chamba, H.P. as

per demand notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Chamba on 09-04-2012 submitted by the

said ex-worker regarding her termination of services.

Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that

during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and

amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts

for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said

dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial

dispute.

Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provide d under sub-section 5

of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above

ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during September,

2004 before the above employer after delay of more than 7 years and has worked only for 86, 72,

30, 98, 48, 120, 110 and 78 days during years 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004

respectively.

Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising

the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-

IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as provide d in sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble

High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for

4769

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal

Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue:—

“Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Guddi Devi w/o Shri Shambhu Ram, r/o

Village Thandal, P.O. Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004

by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D./I.&P.H. Killar (Pangi), District

Chamba, H.P., who has worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised her industrial

dispute after more than 7 years, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of working

period of 86, 72, 30, 98, 48, 120, 110 and 78 days during years 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000,

2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 respectively and delay of more than 7 years in raising the

industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and

compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management? ”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 30th May, 2016

No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute exists between Shri Gulzari Lal alias Yashpal s/o Shri Bihari Lal, r/o Village Loharpura,

Tehsil Suliali, District Kangra, H.P. and (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D.

Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali,

District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services as daily wages beldar during

October, 1990.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as

per power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,

constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on th e following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Gulzari Lal alias Yashpal s/o Shri

Bihari Lal, r/o Village Loharpura, Tehsil Suliali, District Kangra, H.P. during October, 1990

by (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P.

(ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.,

without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by

workman, is legal and justified; whereas he has raised the industrial dispute vide demand

notice dated 09-04-2014 after lapse of more than 23 years. If not, keeping in view delay of

4770

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

more than 23 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority,

past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above

employers?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 30th May, 2016

No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute exists between Shri Subhash Singh s/o Shri Fateh Singh, r/o Village Nera, P.O. Suliali,

Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. and (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D.

Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali,

District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services as daily wages beldar during

September, 1987.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as

per power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,

constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Subhash Singh s/o Shri Fateh Singh,

r/o Village Nera, P.O. Suliali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during September, 1987

by (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P.,

(ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.,

without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by

workman, is legal and justified; whereas he has raised the industrial dispute vide demand

notice dated 24-11-2013 after lapse of more than 26 years. If not, keeping in view delay of

more than 26 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority,

past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above

employers?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner.

4771

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 30th May, 2016

No.: 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute exists between Shri Inder Singh s/o Shri Boota Singh, r/o Village Paladi, P.O. Kot, Tehsil

Nurpur at present V.P.O. Sadwan, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. and the Executive

Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged

termination from services as daily wages beldar during June, 1990.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as

per power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,

constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Inder Singh s/o Shri Boota Singh, r/o

Village Paladi, P.O. Kot, Tehsil Nurpur at present V.P.O. Sadwan, Tehsil Nurpur, District

Kangra, H.P. during June, 1990 by the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D.

Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by workman, is legal and justified; whereas he has raised the

industrial dispute vide demand notice dated 07-08-2013 after lapse of more than 13 years.

If not, keeping in view delay of more than 13 years in raising the industrial dispute, what

amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-

worker is entitled to from the above employers?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 13th May, 2016

No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2014/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute exists between Shri Jai Chand s/o Shri Adam Ram r/o V.P.O. Balag, District Mandi, H.P.

and the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the

issue of alleged time to time termination of his services w.e.f. 21-11-1998 to year, 2010.

4772

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per

power vested under Sub Section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted

under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether time to time termination of the services of Shri Jai Chand s/o Shri Adam Ram, r/o

V.P.O. Balag, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 21-11-1998 to year, 2010 by the Divisional Forest

Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P., without complying with

the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what

amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker

is entitled to from the above employer?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 30th May, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2016/Chamba.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation

Officer, Chamba has submitted a report as provide d under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri Jaisi Ram s/o Shri

Ghatto Ram, r/o Village Udeen, P.O. Shoon, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. and the Executive

Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar (Pangi), District Chamba, H.P. as per demand notice

dated 15-07-2012 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding his termination of services.

Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that

during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and

amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts

for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said

dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial

dispute.

Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provide d under sub-section 5

of Section-12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above

ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during September,

2004 before the above employer after delay of more than 7 years and has worked only for 31, 157,

176, 194, 26 and 45 days during years 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998 and 2004 respectively.

4773

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising

the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-

IV-Loose, dated 15th February 2014 and as provided in sub-section 1 of Section-10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble

High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for

adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal

Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue:—

“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Jaisi Ram s/o Shri Ghatto Ram, r/o Village

Udeen, P.O. Shoon, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004 by the

Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar (Pangi), District Chamba, H.P.,

who has worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his industrial dispute vide

demand notice dated 15-07-2012 after more than 7 years, allegedly without complying with

the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in

view of working period of 31, 157, 176, 194, 26 and 45 days during years 1994, 1995, 1996,

1997, 1998 and 2004 respectively and delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial

dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the

above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management? ”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 30th May, 2016

No.: 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute exists between Shri Joginder Singh s/o Shri Rumal Singh, r/o Village Nera, P.O. Suliali,

Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. and (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D.

Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali,

District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services as daily wages beldar w.e.f.

01-10-1987.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February] 2014 and as

per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,

constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

4774

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Joginder Singh s/o Shri Rumal Singh,

r/o Village Nera, P.O. Suliali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 01-10-1987 by (i)

the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii) the

Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., without

complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by workman,

is legal and justified; whereas he has raised the industrial dispute vide demand notice dated

24-11-2013 after lapse of more than 26 years. If not, keeping in view delay of more than 26

years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service

benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 12th May, 2016

No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute

exists between Shri Kamal kumar s/o Shri Tilak Raj, c/o Shri R.K. Singh Parmar, General

Secretary, Pb. INTUC, L-211, Brari, P.O. Partap Nagar, Tehsil Nangal, District Roper, Punjab and

Managing Director, M/s Arvind Talwar Machine Tools (P) Limited, V.P.O. Nangal Khurad, Tehsil

Haroli, District Una, H.P.on the issue of alleged termination from services w.e.f. 01-07-2014 (as

alleged by workman).

As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that t his

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as

per power vested under sub-section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,

constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether termination of the services of Shri Kamal Kumar s/o Shri Tilak Raj, c/o Shri R.K.

Singh Parmar, General Secretary, Pb. INTUC, L-211, Brari, P.O. Partap Nagar, Tehsil

Nangal, District Ropar, Punjab w.e.f. 01-07-2014 (as alleged by workman) by the Managing

Director, M/s Arvind Talwar Machine Tools (P) Limited, V.P.O. Nangal Khurad, Tehsil

Haroli, District Una, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes

4775

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service

benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 12th May, 2016

No.: 11-3/93(Lab)ID/2016/Kullu.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute

exists between Shri Khem Singh s/o Shri Sharu Ram, r/o Village Rayal, P.O. Peej, Tehsil &

District Mandi, H.P. and the Senior Executive Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B.L. Kullu,

District Kullu, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his services during from 26-10-1989.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as

per power vested under sub-section 1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,

constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether termination of the services of Shri Khem Singh s/o Shri Sharu Ram, r/o Village

Rayal, P.O. Peej, Tehsil & District Mandi, H.P. during 26-10-1989 (as alleged by the

workman), by the Senior Executive Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B.L. Kullu,

District Kullu, H.P. who has worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his

industrial dispute after more than 15 years, allegedly without complying with the provisions

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of

working period from 26-11-1986 to 26-10-1989 and delay of more than 15 years in raising

the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and

compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management? ”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner.

4776

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 30th May, 2016

No.

11-1/18(Lab)ID/2016/Sunder

Nagar.—Whereas

the

Labour

Inspector-cum-

Conciliation Officer, Sunder Nagar has submitted a report as provide d under Section-12(4) of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri

Kishan Lal s/o Shri Dutt Ram, r/o Village Khagrao, P.O. Jaidevi, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District

Mandi, H.P. and the Senior Executive Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B. Limited Sunder

Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. as per demand notice dated 23-02-2013 submitted by the said exworker

regarding his termination of services.

Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that

during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and

amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts

for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said

dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial

dispute.

Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provide d under sub-section 5

of Section-12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above

ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during November,

2000 before the above employer after delay of more than 12 years and has worked only from 27-

02-1985 to October, 2000 respectively.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15^th February, 2014 and as

per power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of

1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,

constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Kishan Lal s/o Shri Dutt Ram, r/o

Village Khagrao, P.O. Jaidevi, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. during November,

2000 by the Senior Executive Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B. Limited Sunder

Nagar, District Mandi, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by workman, is legal and justified; whereas he has raised the

industrial dispute vide demand notice dated 23-02-2013 after lapse of more than 12 years.

If not, keeping in view delay of more than 12 years in raising the industrial dispute, what

amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-

worker is entitled to from the above employer?”

By order,

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner.

4777

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

LAW DEPARTMENT

CORRIGENDUM

Shimla-2, the 3rd August,2017

No. LLR-D(6)-8/2017-Leg.—In Himachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (10

of 2017) notified vide this department Notification of even number dated 23rd June, 2017 and

published in the Rajpatra, Himachal Pradesh on the same day at pages 2437 to 2680, in the

Authoritative English Text, in the long title appearing at page 2568, the words and sign “ inter-

State” may be read as ‘‘intra-State”.

By order,

DR. BALDEV SINGH

LR-cum-Pr. Secretary (Law).

___________

jktLo foHkkx

vf/klwpuk

f'keyk&2] 2 vxLr] 2017

la[;k% jSo&,0 ¼,0½ 3&1@2017-&fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky] Hkkjr ds lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 309

ds ijUrqd }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] fgekpy izns'k yksd lsok vk;ksx ds ijke'kZ ls]

fgekpy izns'k jktLo foHkkx esa e.Myk;qDr dk;kZYk;ksa] mik;qDr dk;kZy;ksa] cUnkscLr e.Myksa vkSj funs'kd]

Hkw&vfHkys[k] dk;kZy; esa futh lfpo] oxZ&I ¼jktif=r½ ds in ds fy, bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu

mikcU/k&ÞdÞ ds vuqlkj HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;e cukrs gSa] vFkkZr~%&

1- laf{kIr uke vkSj izkjEHk-&¼1½ bu fu;eksa dk laf{kIr uke fgekpy izns'k jktLo foHkkx esa

e.Myk;qDr dk;kZYk;ksa] mik;qDr dk;kZy;ksa] cUnkscLr e.Myksa vkSj funs'kd] Hkw&vfHkys[k dk;kZy;] futh

lfpo] oxZ&I ¼jktif=r½ HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;e] 2017 gSA

¼2½ ;s fu;e jkti=] fgekpy izns'k esa izdkf'kr fd, tkus dh rkjh[k ls izo`Rr gksaxsA

vkns'k }kjk]

gLrk{kfjr@&

vfrfjDr eq[; lfpo ,oa foRrk;qDr ¼jktLo½A

&&&&&&

mikcU/k&Þdß

fgekpy izns'k jktLo foHkkx esa futh lfpo] oxZ&I ¼jktif=r½ fyfid oxhZ; lsok,a ds in ds

fy, HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;e

1- in dk uke-&futh lfpo

4778

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

2- inksa ¼inksa½ dh la[;k-&18 ¼vBkjg½

izR;sd e.Myk;qDr] dk;kZy;] mik;qDr dk;kZy;] cankscLr e.My o funs”kd] Hkw&vfHkys[k

dk;kZy; esa ,d&,d in A

3- oxhZdj.k-&oxZ&I ¼jktif=r½ ¼fyfid oxhZ; lsok;sa½

4- osrueku-& `15600&39100+ `5400 xzsM is

5- Þp;uß in vFkok Þvp;uß in-&vp;u

6- lh/kh HkrhZ ds fy, vk;q-&ykxw ugha

7- lh/kh HkrhZ fd, tkus okys O;fDr ¼O;fDr;ksa½ ds fy, visf{kr U;wure 'kSf{kd vkSj vU;

vgZrk,a-&&¼d½ vfuok;Z vgZrk-&&ykxw ughaA

¼[k½ okaNuh; vgZrk-&&ykxw ugha

8- lh/kh HkrhZ fd, tkus okys O;fDr ¼O;fDr;ksa½ ds fy, fofgr vk;q vkSj 'kSf{kd vgZrk¼,½ izksUur

O;fDr ¼O;fDr;ksa½ dh n'kk esa ykxw gksxh ;k ughas%

vk;q-&&ykxw ughaA

'kSf{kd vgZrk-&&ykxw ughaA

9- ifjoh{kk dh vof/k] ;fn dksbZ gks-&&nks o’kZ] ftldk ,d o’kZ ls vukf/kd ,slh vkSj vof/k ds

fy, foLrkj fd;k tk ldsxk tSlk l{ke izkf/kdkjh fo”ks’k ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa vkSj dkj.kksa dks fyf[kr esa

vfHkfyf[kr djds vkns”k nsa A

10- HkrhZ dh Ik)fr% HkrhZ lh/kh gksxh ;k [email protected]@LFkkukUrj.k }kjk vkSj fofHkUu

Ik)fr;ksa }kjk Hkjs tkus okys in¼inksa½ dh izfr'krrk-&“krizfr”kr izksUufr }kjkA

11- [email protected]@LFkkukUrj.k }kjk HkrhZ dh n'kk esa os Jsf.k;ka¼xzsM½ ftuls izksUufr@

[email protected] fd;k tk,xk-&futh lgk;d ¼lgk;dksa½ esa ls izksUufr }kjk ftudk ikap o’kZ dk

fu;fer lsokdky ;k xzsM esa dh xbZ yxkrkj rnFkZ lsok] ;fn dksbZ gks] dks lfEefyr djds ikap o’kZ dk

fu;fer lsokdky gks] ,slk u gksus ij futh lgk;d ¼lgk;dksa½ esa ls izksUufr }kjk ftudk futh lgk;d

¼lgk;dksa½ vkSj ofj’B osrueku vk'kqfyfid ds :Ik esa la;qDrr% pkSng o’kZ dk fu;fer lsokdky ;k xzsM esa

dh xbZ yxkrkj rnFkZ lsok] ;fn dksbZ gks] dks lfEefyr djds pkSng o’kZ dk fu;fer lsokdky gks ftlesa

futh lgk;d ds :Ik esa nks o’kZ dh vfuok;Z lsok Hkh lfEefyr gksxh] nksuks ds u gksus ij futh lgk;d

¼lgk;dksa½ esa ls izksUufr }kjk ftudk futh lgk;d] ofj’B osrueku vk'kqfyfid vkSj dfu’B osrueku

vk'kqfyid ds :Ik esa la;qDrr% mUuhl o’kZ dk fu;fer lsokdky ;k xzsM esa dh xbZ yxkrj rnFkZ lsok]

;fn dksbZ gks] dks lfEefyr djds mUuhl o’kZ dk fu;fer lsokdky gks ftlesa futh lgk;d ds :Ik esa nks

o’kZ dh vfuok;Z lsok Hkh lfEefyr gksxhA mijksDr leLr ds u gksus ij futh lgk;d ¼lgk;dksa½ esa ls

izkUufr }kjk ftudk futh lgk;d] ofj’B osrueku vk'kqfyfid] dfu’B osrueku vk'kqfyfid vkSj

vk'kqVadd ds :Ik esa la;qDrr% pkSchl o’kZ dk fu;fer lsokdky ;k xzsM esa dh xbZ yxkrkj rnFkZ lsok]

;fn dksbZ gks] dks lfEefyr djds pkSchl o’kZ dk fu;fer lsokdky gks] ftlesa futh lgk;d ds :Ik esa nks

o’kZ dh vfuok;Z lsok Hkh lfEeyr gksxh%

4779

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

ijUrq izksUufr ds iz;kstu ds fy,] Hkw&vfHkys[k funs'kky; esa dk;Zjr in/kkfj;ksa ds flok;] leLr

ik= deZpkjh ¼deZpkfj;ksa½ dh] muds lsokdky ds vk/kkj ij mudh laoxZokj ewy ofj’Brk dks NsM+s fcuk

fuEufyf[kr jhfr esa] ,d i`Fkd~ la;qDr ofj’Brk rS;kj dh tk,xh%&

¼i½ jkT; esa leLr mik;qDrksa dh LFkkiuk esa dk;Zjr deZpkfj;ksa dh mik;qDrksa ds lkFk futh

lfpo ds inksa dh izksUufr ds fy, ,d i`Fkd~ la;qDr ofj’Brk rS;kj dh tk,xhA

¼ii½ jkT; esa leLr e.Myk;qDrksa dh LFkkiuk esa dk;Zjr deZpkfj;ksa dh e.Myk;qDrksa ds lkFk futh

lfpo ds inksa dh izksUufr ds fy, ,d i`Fkd~ la;qDr ofj’Brk rS;kj dh tk,xhA

¼iii½ jkT; esa leLr cUnkscLr e.Myksa dh LFkkiuk esa dk;Zjr deZpkfj;ksa dh cUnkscLr vf/kdkfj;ksa

ds lkFk futh lfpo ds inksa dh izksUufr ds fy, ,d i`Fkd~ la;qDr ofj’Brk rS;kj dh tk,xh%

ijUrq ;g vkSj fd foHkkxh; izksUufr lfefr dh flQkfj'k ij in/kkfj;ksa dks [email protected]@

cUnkscLr dkMj inksa dh miyC/k fjfDr;ksa ds fo:) rn~uqlkj rSukr@LFkkukUrfjr fd;k tk,xk A

¼I½ izksUufr ds iz;kstu ds fy, izR;sd deZpkjh dks] tutkrh;@dfBu@nqxZe {ks=ksa vkSj

[email protected] {ks=ksa esa in ¼inksa½ dh ,sls {ks=ksa esa Ik;kZIr la[;k dh miyC/krk ds v/;/khu] de ls de ,d

dk;Zdky rd lsok djuh gksxh%

IkjUrq nwjLFk xzkeh.k {ks=ksa esa rSukrh @LFkkukUrj.k ds flok; mijksDr ijUrqd ¼1½ mu deZpkfj;ksa ds

ekeys esa ykxw ugha gksxk ftudh vf/kof’kZrk ds fy, ik¡p o’kZ ;k mlls de dh lsok 'ks’k jgh gksA rFkkfi

,sls in/kkfj;ksa dks izksUufr ij [email protected] {ks=ksa esa rSukr@LFkkukUrfjr fd;k tk ldsxk%

IkjUrq ;g vkSj Hkh fd mu vf/kdkfj;ksa@deZpkfj;ksa dks] ftUgksaus tutkrh;@dfBu @ nqxZe {ks=ksa

vkSj [email protected] {ks=ksa esa de ls de ,d dk;Zdky rd lsok ugha dh gS] ,sls {ks= esa mlds vius laoxZ

¼dkMj½ esa loZFkk ofj’Brk ds vuqlkj LFkkukUrj.k fd;k tk,xkA

Li’Vhdj.k&I.— mijksDr ijUrqd ¼1½ ds iz;kstu ds fy, tutkrh;@dfBu@nqxZe {ks=ksa vkSj

[email protected] {ks=ksa esa **dk;Zdky** ls lk/kkj.kr;k rhu o’kZ dh vof/k ;k iz'kklfud

vR;ko';drkvksa@lqfo/kk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ,sls {ks=ksa esa rSukrh dh blls de vof/k vfHkizsr gksxh A

Li’Vhdj.k&II.—mijksDr ijUrqd ¼1½ ds Ikz;kstu ds fy, tutkrh;@dfBu @ nqxZe {ks=ksa vkSj

[email protected] {ks= fuEu izdkj ls gksaxs%&

1- ftyk ykgkSy ,oa fLifrA

2- pEck ftyk dk ik¡xh vkSj HkjekSj mi&e.MyA

3- jksgMw+ mi&e.My dk MksMjk Dokj {ks=A

4- ftyk f'keyk dh jkeiqj rglhy dk iUnzg chl ijxuk] eqfu'k njdkyh vkSj xzke iapk;r

dk'kkikVA

5- dqYyw ftyk dk iUnzg chl ijxukA

6- dka¡xM+k ftyk ds cStukFk mi&e.My dk cM+k Hkaxky {ks=A

7- ftyk fdUukSjA

4780

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

8- fljekSj ftyk esa mi&rglhy dejm ds dkBokM+ vkSj dksjxk iVokj o`Rr] js.kqdkth rglhy

ds HkykM+&HkYkkSuk vkSj lkaxuk iVokj o`Rr vkSj f'kykbZ rglhy dk dksVk ikc iVokj o`RrA

9- e.Mh ftyk esa djlksx rglhy dk [kU;ksy&cxM+k iVokj o`Rr] ckyh pkSdh mi&rglhy ds

xkMk xkslkbZa] eB;kuh] ?ku;kM+] Fkkph] ckxh]lksexkM+ vkSj [kksykuky iVokj o`Rr] Ik)j

rglhy ds >kjokM+] dqVx<+] xzkeu] nsox<+] VªSyk] jksik] dFkksx] flYg&HkM+okuh] gLriqj]

?kejsM+ vkSj HkVs<+ iVokj o`Rr] Fkqukx rglhy ds fp;w.kh] dkyhikj] ekux<+] Fkkp&cxM+k

mRrjh ex: vkSj nf{k.kh ex: iVokj o`Rr vkSj lqUnjuxj rglhy dk cVokM+k iVokj o`RrA

Li’Vhdj.k&III.—mi;ZqDr ijUrqd ¼1½ ds iz;kstu ds fy, [email protected] {ks= fuEu izdkj ls

gksaxs%&

(i) mi&e.My@rglhy eq[;ky; ls 20 fdyksehVj dh ifjf/k ls ijs ds leLr LFkkuA

(ii) jkT; eq[;ky; vkSj ftyk eq[;ky; ls 15 fdyksehVj dh ifjf/k ls ijs ds leLr LFkku tgk¡

ds fy, cl lsok miyC/k ugha gS vkSj 3 ¼rhu½ fdykehVj ls vf/kd dh iSny ;k=k djuh iM+rh gSA

(iii) deZpkjh dk] mlds izoxZ dks /;ku esa yk, fcuk] vius x`guxj ;k x`guxj {ks= ds lkFk

yxrk 20 fdyksehVj dh ifjf/k ds Hkhrj dk {ks=A

¼II½ izksUufr ds lHkh ekeyksa esa in ij fu;fer fu;qfDr ls iwoZ] lEHkjd ¼iks’kd½ in ij dh xbZ

yxkrkj rnFkZ lsok] ;fn dksbZ gks] bu fu;eksa eas ;Fkkfofgr lsokdky ds fy,] bl 'krZ ds v/;/khu izksUufr

ds fy, x.kuk esa yh tk,xh] fd lEHkjd ¼iks’kd½ izoxZ esa rnFkZ fu;qfDr@izksUufr HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;eksa

ds micU/kksa ds vuqlkj p;u dh mfpr Lohdk;Z izfØ;k dks viukus ds Ik'pkr~ dh xbZ Fkh%

¼i½ ijUrq mu lHkh ekeyksa esa ftuesa dksbZ dfu"B O;fDr lEHkjd ¼iks’kd½ in esa vius dqy

lsokdky ¼rnFkZ vk/kkj ij dh xbZ lsok lfgr] tks fu;fer lsok@fu;qfDr ds vuqlj.k esa gks½ ds vk/kkj ij

mi;qZDr fufnZ"V micU/kksa ds dkj.k fopkj fd, tkus dk ik= gks tkrk gS] ogk¡ mlls ofj"B lHkh O;fDr

vius&vius izoxZ@in@dkMj esa fopkj fd, tkus ds ik= le>s tk,axs vkSj fopkj djrs le; dfu"B

O;fDr ls Åij j[ks tk,axs%

ijUrq ;g vkSj fd mu lHkh in/kkfj;ksa dh] ftu ij izksUufr ds fy, fopkj fd;k tkuk gS] dh de

ls de rhu o"kZ dh U;wure vgZrk lsok ;k in ds HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;eksa esa fofgr lsok] tks Hkh de gks]

gksxh%

ijUrq ;g vkSj Hkh fd tgk¡ dksbZ O;fDr iwoZxkeh ijUrqd dh vis{kkvksa ds dkj.k izksUufr fd, tkus

lEcU/kh fopkj ds fy, vik= gks tkrk gS] ogk¡ mlls dfu"B O;fDr Hkh ,slh izksUufr ds fopkj ds fy,

vik= le>k tk,xk@le>s tk,axsA

Li"Vhdj.k-&vafre ijUrqd ds vUrxZr dfu"B in/kkjh izksUufr ds fy, vik= ugha le>k tk,xk

;fn ofj"B vik= O;fDr HkwriwoZ lSfud gS ftls fMekschykbTM vkeMZ QksflZt ijlksuy ¼fjtosZ'ku vkWQ

oSdsUlht bu fgekpy LVsV ukWu VSDuhdy lfoZlht½ :Yt] 1972 ds fu;e 3 ds micU/kksa ds vUrxZr HkrhZ

fd;k x;k gS vkSj rn~/khu ojh;rk ykHk fn, x, gksa ;k ftls ,Dl lfoZleSu ¼fjtosZ'ku vkWQ oSdsUlht bu

nh fgekpy izns'k VSDuhdy lfoZlht½ :Yt] 1985 ds fu;e 3 ds micU/kksa ds vUrxZr HkrhZ fd;k x;k gks

vkSj rn~/khu ojh;rk ykHk fn, x, gksaA

¼ii½ blh izdkj LFkk;hdj.k ds lHkh ekeyksa es ,sls in ij fu;fer fu;qfDr@izksUufr ls iwoZ

lEHkjd ¼iks’kd½ in ij dh xbZ yxkrkj rnFkZ lsok] ;fn dksbZ gks] lsokdky ds fy, x.kuk esa yh tk,xh]

4781

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

;fn rnFkZ fu;qfDr@izksUufr mfpr p;u ds Ik'pkr~ vkSj HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;eksa ds micU/kksa ds vuqlkj

dh xbZ Fkh%

ijUrq dh xbZ rnFkZ lsok dks x.kuk esa ysus ds Ik'pkr~ tks LFkk;hdj.k gksxk mlds QyLo:Ik

ikjLifjd ojh;rk vifjofrZr jgsxhA

12- ;fn foHkkxh; izksUufr lfefr fo|eku gks rks mldh lajpuk-&tSlk ljdkj }kjk le;&le;

ij xfBr dh tk,A

13- HkrhZ djus esa ftu ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa fgekpy izns'k yksd lsok vk;ksx ls ijke'kZ fd;k tk,xk-&

tSlk fof/k }kjk visf{kr gks A

14- lh/kh HkrhZ ds fy, vfuok;Z vis{kk-&Ykkxw ugha A

15- lh/kh HkrhZ }kjk in ij fu;qfDr ds fy, p;u-&ykxw ughaA

16- vkj{k.k-& lsok esa fu;qfDr] fgekpy izns'k ljdkj }kjk] le;&le; ij vuqlwfpr tkfr;ksa@

vuqlwfpr tutkfr;ksa @vU; fiNMs oxksZa vkSj O;fDr;ksa ds vU; izoxksZa ds fy, lsok esa vkj{k.k dh ckcr

tkjh fd, x, vkns”kksa ds] v/khu gksxh A

17- foHkkxh; ijh{kk-&lsok esa izR;sd lnL; dks le;&le; ij ;Fkk la”kksf/kr fgekpy izns”k

foHkkxh; ijh{kk fu;e] 1997 esa ;Fkk fofgr foHkkxh; ijh{kk mrh.kZ djuh gksxh A

18- f'kfFky djus dh 'kfDr-&tgka jkT; ljdkj dh ;g jk; gks fd ,slk djuk vko';d ;k

lehphu gS] ogka og] dkj.kksa dks fyf[kr esa vfHkfyf[kr djds vkSj fgekpy izns'k yksd lsok vk;ksx ds

ijke'kZ ls] vkns'k }kjk] bu fu;eksa ds fdlh@fdUgh micU/k¼miCkU/kksa½ dks fdlh oxZ ;k O;fDr¼O;fDr;ksa½ ds

izoxZ ;k in¼inksa½ dh ckcr] f'kfFky dj ldsxh A

__________

[Authoritative English Text of this Department Notification No. REV-A(A)3-1/2017 dated 02-08-

2017 as required under clause (3) of Article 348 of the Constitution of India].

REVENUE DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171002, the 2^nd August, 2017

No. Rev-A (A) 3-1/2017.—In exercise of the powers conferred by proviso to article 309 of

the Constitution of India, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, in consultation with the Himachal

Pradesh Public Service Commission, is pleased to make the Recruitment & Promotion Rules for the

post of Private Secretary, Class-I(Gazetted) in the Divisional Commissioner Offices, Deputy

Commissioner Offices, Settlement Divisions and Director, Land Records in the Revenue

Department as per Annexure-“A”, attached this Notification, namely:—

1.

Short title and commencement.—(1) These rules may be called the Himachal

Pradesh Department of Revenue, Divisional Commissioner Offices, Deputy Commissioner Offices,

Settlement Divisions and Director, Land Records, Private Secretary, Class-I(Gazetted),

Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 2017.

4782

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

(2) These rules shall come into force from the date of publication in the Rajpatra,

Himachal Pradesh.

By order,

Sd/-

A.C.S.-cum-F.C.(Rev.).

__________

ANNEXURE-“A”

RECRUITMENT AND PROMOTION RULES FOR THE POST OF PRIVATE

SECRETARY, CLASS-I (GAZETTED),(MINISTERIAL SERVICES) IN THE

REVENUE DEPARTMENT, HIMACHAL PRADESH

1. Name of the post.—Private Secretary

2. Number of post.—18 (Eighteen)

(One post each in the Divisional Commissioner offices, Deputy Commissioner offices,

Settlement Divisions and Director, Land Records).

3. Classification.—Class-I (Gazetted) (Ministerial Services)

4. Scale of pay.— ` 15600-39100+` 5400 Grade Pay

5. Whether “Selection” post or “Non-Selection” post.—Non-Selection

6. Age for direct recruitment.—Not applicable.

7. Minimum Educational and other qualifications required for direct recruit(s).—

(a) Essential Qualification.—Not applicable.

(b) Desirable Qualification.—Not applicable.

8. Whether age and educational qualification(s) prescribed for direct recruit(s) will

apply in the case of the promotee(s).—

Age : Not applicable.

Educational Qualification: Not applicable.

9. Period of probation, if any.—Two years subject to such further extension for a period

not exceeding one year as may be ordered by the competent authority in special circumstances and

reasons to be recorded in writing.

10. Method(s) of recruitment, whether by direct recruitment or by promotion/

secondment/transfer and the percentage of post(s) to be filled in by various methods.—100%

by promotion.

11. In case of recruitment by promotion/secondment/transfer, grade from which

promotion/secondment/transfer is to be made.—By Promotion from amongst the Personal

4783

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

Assistant(s) possessing 05(five) years regular service or regular combined with continuous adhoc

service, if any, in the grade, failing which by promotion from amongst the Personal Assistant(s)

possessing 14(fourteen) years regular service or regular combined with continuous adhoc service, if

any, as Personal Assistant & Senior Scale Stenographer combined which shall also include 02(two)

years essential service as Personal Assistant failing both by promotion from amongst the Personal

Assistant(s) possessing 19 (nineteen) years regular service or regular combined with continuous

adhoc service, if any, as Personal Assistant, Senior Scale Stenographer & Junior Scale

Stenographer combined which shall also include 02 (two) years essential service as Personal

Assistant, failing all by promotion from amongst the Personal Assistant(s) possessing 24(twenty

four) years regular service or regular combined with continuous adhoc service, if any, as Personal

Assistant, Senior Scale Stenographer, Junior Scale Stenographer & Steno Typist combined which

shall also include 02(two) years essential service as Personal Assistant:

Provided that for the purpose of promotion a separate combined seniority of all the eligible

official(s), except incumbents working in the Directorate of Land Records, shall be prepared on the

basis of their length of service, without disturbing their cadre-wise original seniority, in the

following manner:

(i) A separate combined seniority of officials working in the establishments of all Deputy

Commissioners in the State shall be prepared for promotion to the posts of Private Secretary with

Deputy Commissioners.

(ii) A separate combined seniority of officials working in the establishment of all

Divisional Commissioners in the State shall be prepared for promotion to the posts of Private

Secretary with Divisional Commissioners.

(iii) A separate combined seniority of officials working in the establishment of all

Settlement Divisions in the State shall be prepared for promotion to the posts of Private Secretary

with Settlement Officers:

Provided further that on the recommendation of the Departmental Promotion Committee,

incumbents shall be posted/transferred accordingly against the available vacancies of

Districts/Divisional/ Settlement cadre posts.

(I) Provided that for the purpose of promotion every employee shall have to serve atleast

one term in the Tribal/ Difficult/Hard areas and remote/rural areas subject to adequate number of

posts(s) available in such areas:

Provided further that the proviso (I) supra shall not be applicable in the case of those

employees who have five years or less service, left for superannuation except posting/transfer in

remote/rural area. However, such incumbents may be posted/transferred to remote/rural areas in

their promotion:

Provided further that Officers/Officials who have not served atleast one tenure in

Tribal/Difficult/Hard areas and remote/rural areas shall be transferred to such area strictly in

accordance with his/her seniority in the respective cadre.

Explanation I.—For the purpose of proviso (I) supra the “term” in Tribal/Difficult/Hard

areas/remote/rural areas shall mean normally three years or less period of posting in such areas

keeping in view the administrative exigencies/convenience.

4784

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

Explanation II.—For the purpose of proviso (I) supra the Tribal/Difficult Areas shall be as

under:-—

1. District Lahaul & Spiti.

2. Pangi and Bharmour Sub Division of Chamba District.

3. Dodra Kawar Area of Rohru Sub-Division.

4. Pandrah Bis Pargana, Munish Darkali and Gram panchayat Kashapat,Gram Panchyats

of Rampur Tehsil of District Shimla.

5. Pandrah Bis Pargana of Kullu District.

6. Bara Bhangal Areas of Baijnath Sub Division of Kangra District.

7. District Kinnaur.

8. Kathwar and Korga Patwar Circles of Kamrau Sub Tehsil, Bhaladh Bhalona and

Sangna Patwar Circles of Renukaji Tehsil and Kota Pab Patwar Circle of Shillai

Tehsil, in Sirmour District.

9. Khanyol-Bagra Patwar Circle of Karsog Tehsil, Gada-Gussaini, Mathyani, Ghanyar,

Thachi, Baggi, Somgad and Kholanal of Bali-Chowki Sub Tehsil, Jharwar, Kutgarh,

Graman, Devgarh, Trailla, Ropa, Kathog, Silh-Badhwani, Hastpur, Ghamrehar and

Bhatehar Patwar Circle of Padhar Tehsil, Chiuni, Kalipar, Mangarh, Thach-Bagra,

North Magru and South Magru Patwar Circles of Thunag Tehsil and Batwara Patwar

Circle of Sunder Nagar Tehsil in Mandi District.

Explanation III.— For the purpose of proviso (I) supra the Remote/ Rural Areas shall be

as under:

(i) All statitions beyond the radius of 20 Kms. from sub Division/Tehsil headquarter.

(ii) All stations beyond the radius of 15 Kms. from State Headquarter and District head

quarters where bus service is not available and on foot journey is more than 3 (three) Kms.

(iii) Home town or area adjoining to area of home town within the radius of 20 Kms. of the

employee regardless of its category.

(II) In all cases of promotion, the continuous adhoc services rendered in the feeder post, if

any, prior to regular appointment to the post shall be taken into account towards the length of

service as prescribed in these rules for promotion subject to the condition that the adhoc

appointment/promotion in the feeder category had been made after following proper acceptable

process of selection in accordance with the provisions of R&P Rules:

(i) Provided that in all cases where a junior person becomes eligible for consideration by

virtue of his total length of service (including the service rendered on adhoc basis followed by

4785

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

regular service/appointment) in the feeder post in view of the provisions referred to above, all

persons senior to him in the respective category post/cadre shall be deemed to be eligible for

consideration and placed above the junior person in the field of consideration:

Provided that all incumbents to be considered for promotion shall possess the minimum

qualifying service of atleast three years or that prescribed in the Recruitment & Promotion rules for

the post, whichever is less:

Provided further that where a person becomes ineligible to be considered for promotion on

account of the requirements of the preceding proviso, the person(s) junior to him shall also be

deemed to be ineligible for consideration for such promotion.

EXPLANATION.—The last proviso shall not render the junior incumbents ineligible for

consideration for promotion if the senior ineligible person happened to be Ex-servicemen recruited

under the provisions of rule-3 of Demobilized Armed Forces Personnel (Reservations of vacancies

in Himachal State Non-Technical Services) Rules, 1972 and having been given the benefit of

seniority thereunder or recruited under the provisions of Rule-3 of Ex-servicemen (Reservations of

vacancies in the Himachal Pradesh Technical Services) Rules, 1985 and having been given the

benefit of seniority thereunder.

(ii) Similarly in all cases of confirmation, continuous adhoc service rendered on the feeder

post, if any, prior to the regular appointment against such posts shall be taken into account towards

the length of service, if the adhoc appointment/promotion had been made after proper selection and

in accordance with the provisions of Recruitment & Promotion rules:

Provided that inter-se-seniority as a result of confirmation after taking into account, adhoc

service rendered shall remain unchanged.

12. If a Departmental Promotion Committee exists, what is its composition.—As may

be constituted by the Government from time to time.

13. Circumstances under which the Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission is

to be consulted in making recruitments.—As required under the Law.

14. Essential requirement for a direct recruitment.—Not Applicable.

15. Selection for appointment to post by direct recruitment.—Not Applicable.

16. Reservation.—The appointment to the service shall be subject to orders regarding

reservation in the service for Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe/ Other Backward Classes/other

categories of persons issued by the Himachal Pradesh Government from time to time.

17. Departmental Examination.—Every member of the service shall pass a Departmental

Examination as prescribed in the H.P. Departmental Examination Rules, 1997, as amended from

time to time.

18. Power to relax.—Where the State Government is of the opinion that it is necessary or

expedient to do so, it may, by order for reasons to be recorded in writing and in consultation with

the Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission relax any of the provision(s) of these rules with

respect to any class or category of person(s) or posts.

4786

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

LokLF; ,oa ifjokj dY;k.k foHkkx

vf/klwpuk

f”keyk&171 002] 21 tqykbZ] 2017

la[;k % LokLF;&,&,¼3½&1@99-&&fgekpy izns”k ds jkT;iky] Hkkjr ds lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 309

ds ijUrqd }kjk iznRr “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] fgekpy izns”k yksd lsok vk;ksx ds ijke”kZ ls]

fgekpy izns”k LokLF; ,oa ifjokj dY;k.k foHkkx esa LokLF; f'k{kd] oxZ&ІII ¼vjktif=r½ ds in ds fy,

bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu mikcU/k&"d" ds vuqlkj HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;e cukrs gaS] vFkkZr~ %&

1- laf{kIr uke vkSj izkjEHk-&&¼1½ bu fu;eksa dk laf{kIr uke fgekpy izns”k LokLF; ,oa

ifjokj dY;k.k foHkkx LokLF; f'k{kd] oxZ&ІII ¼vjktif=r½ HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;e] 2017 gSA

¼2½ ;s fu;e jkti= ¼bZ&xt+V½] fgekpy izns”k esas izdkf”kr fd, tkus dh rkjh[k ls izo`Rr gksaxsA

2- fujlu vkSj O;ko`fr;ka-&&¼1½ bl foHkkx dh vf/klwpuk la[;k LokLF;&d&,¼3½&41@96]

Rkkjh[k 29 vDrwcj] 1999 }kjk vf/klwfpr fgekpy izns”k LokLF; ,oa ifjokj dY;k.k foHkkx LokLF;

f'k{kd] oxZ&ІII ¼vjktif=r½ HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;e] 1999 dk ,rn~}kjk fujlu fd;k tkrk gS A

¼2½ ,sls fujlu ds gksrs gq, Hkh mi;ZqDr mi fu;e 2¼1½ ds v/khu bl izdkj fujflr fu;eksa ds

v/khu dh xbZ dksbZ fu;qfDr] ckr ;k dkjZokbZ bu fu;eksa ds v/khu fof/kekU; :Ik esa dh xbZ le>h tk,xhA

vkns'k }kjk]

gLrk{kfjr@&

izËkku lfpo ¼LokLF;½A

&&&&&&&&

mikcU/k &^^d**

LokLF; ,oa ifjokj dY;k.k foHkkx fgekpy izns'k esa LokLF; f'k{kd] oxZ&III ¼vjktif=r½ ds in ds fy,

HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;e

1- Ikn dk uke-&&LokLF; f'k{kd

2- Ikn ¼inksa½ dh la[;k-&&99 ¼fuU;kuos½

3- oxhZdj.k-&&oxZ&III ¼vjktif=r½ vfyfid oxhZ; lsok,a

4- Oksreku-&& `10300&34800 tek ` 4200@& xszM is

5- ^^Pk;u** in vFkok ^^vp;u in **-&&ykxw ugha

6- Lkh/kh HkrhZ ds fy, vk;q-&&ykxw ugha

7- Lkh/kh HkrhZ fd, tkus okys O;fDr ¼O;fDr;ksa½ ds fy, visf{kr U;wure “kSf{kd vkSj vU;

vgZrk,a-&&¼d½ vfuok;Z vgZrk,a-&ykxw ugha A

4787

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

¼[k½ okaNuh; vgZrk,a-&ykxw ugha A

8- Lkh/kh HkrhZ fd, tkus okys O;fDr ¼O;fDr;ksa½ ds fy, fofgr vk;q vkSj “kSf{kd vgZrk,Wa izksUur

O;fDr ¼O;fDr;ksa½ dh n”kk esa ykxw gksaxh ;k ugha%

¼d½ vk;q-&&ykxw ugha A

¼[k½ “kSf{kd vgZrk,a-&&tSlh uhps LrEHk la[;k 11 ds lkeus fofgr gSa

9-

Ikfjoh{kk dh vof/k] ;fn dksbZ gks-&ykxw ughaA

10- HkrhZ dh Ik)fr % HkrhZ lh/kh gksxh ;k [email protected]@LFkkukUrj.k }kjk vkSj fofHkUu

i)fr;ksa }kjk Hkjh tkus okys in¼inksa½ dh izfr”kRkrk-&& 'krizfr'kr LFkkukiUu }kjk] ,slk u gksus ij

izksUufr }kjkA

11- [email protected]@LFkkukUrj.k }kjk HkrhZ dh n”kk esa os Jsf.k;ka ¼xzsM½ ftuls izksUufr@

[email protected] fd;k tk,xk-&&iq:’k LokLF; i;Zos{kdksa@efgyk LokLF; i;Zos{kdksa esa ls LFkkukiUu

}kjk tks LokLF; f'k{kk esa ekU;rk izkIr fMIyksek j[krs gksa rFkk ftudk ikap o"kZ dk fu;fer lsokdky ;k

xzsM esa dh xbZ yxkrkj rnFkZ lsok] ;fn dksbZ gks] dks lfEefyr djds ikap o"kZ dk fu;fer lsokdky gks]

,slk u gksus ij iq:"k LokLF; dk;ZdRrkZvksa@efgyk LokLF; dk;ZdÙkkZvksa esa ls izksUufr }kjk tks LokLF;

f'k{kk esa ekU;rk izkIr fMIyksek j[krs gksa rFkk ftudk nl o"kZ dk fu;fer lsokdky ;k xzsM esa dh xbZ

yxkrkj rnFkZ lsok] ;fn dksbZ gks] dks lfEefyr djds nl o"kZ dk fu;fer lsokdky gks%

ijUrq LFkkukiUu@izksUufr ds iz;kstu ds fy, iq:"k LokLF; i;Zos{kd@efgyk LokLF; i;Zos{kd

vkSj iq:"k LokLF; dk;ZdÙkkZ@efgyk LokLF; dk;ZdÙkkZ dk in /kkj.k djus okys ik= deZpkfj;ksa dh mudh

laoxZokj ijLifjd ofj"Brk dks NsM+s fcuk ,d la;qDr ofj"Brk lwph rS;kj dh tk,xh A

¼I½ izksUufr ds iz;kstu ds fy, izR;sd deZpkjh dks tutkrh;@dfBu@nqxZe {ks=ksa vkSj nwjLFk

xzkeh.k {ks=ksa esa in ¼inksa½ dh ,sls {ks=ksa esa Ik;kZIr la[;k dh miyC/krk ds v/;/khu] de ls de ,d

dk;Zdky rd lsok djuh gksxh%

ijUrq mijksDr ijUrqd ¼1½ mu deZpkfj;ksa ds ekeys esa ykxw ugha gksxk ftudh vf/kof’kZrk ds fy,

ikap o’kZ ;k mlls de dh lsok “ks’k jgh gksa A rFkkfi ikap o"kZ dh ;g 'krZ izksUufr ds ekeyksa esa ykxw ugha

gksxh %

ijUrq ;g vkSj Hkh fd mu vf/kdfj;ksa@deZpkfj;ksa dks] ftUgksaus tutkrh;@dfBu@nqxZe {ks= vkSj

nwjLFk xzkeh.k {ks=ksa esa de ls de ,d dk;Zdky rd lsok ugha dh gS] ,sls {ks= esa mlds vius laoxZ

¼dkMj½ esa loZFkk ofj’Brk ds vuqlkj LFkkukUrj.k fd;k tk,xk A

Li"Vhdj.k I.—mijksDr ijUrqd ¼1½ ds iz;kstu ds fy, tutkrh;@dfBu@nqxZe {ks=ksa@nwjLFk@

xzkeh.k {ks=ksa esa ßdk;Zdkyß ls lk/kkj.kr;k rhu o’kZ dh vof/k ;k iz”kklfud vR;ko';drkvksa@lqfo/kkvksa

dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ,sls {ks=ksa esa rSukrh dh blls de vof/k vfHkizsr gksxhA

Li"Vhdj.k II.—mijksDr ijUrqd ¼1½ ds iz;kstu ds fy, tutkrh;@dfBu nqxZe {ks= fuEu izdkj

ls gksaxs %&

1.

ftyk ykgkSy ,oa fLifr A

2.

pEck ftyk dk ikaxh vkSj HkjekSj mi&e.My A

4788

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

3.

jksgM+w mi&e.My dk MksMjk Dokj {ks= A

4.

ftyk f”keyk dh jkeiqj rglhy dk iUnzg chl ijxuk] eqfu'k] njdkyh vkSj xzke iapk;r

dk”kkikV A

5.

dqYyw ftyk dk iUnzg chl ijxuk A

6.

dkaxM+k ftyk ds cStukFk mi&e.My dk cMk Hkaxky {ks= A

7.

ftyk fdUukSj A

8.

fljekSj ftyk esa mi&rglhy dejÅ ds dkBokM+ vkSj dksjxk iVokj o`Rr] js.kqdkth rglhy

ds HkykM+&HkykSuk vkSj lkaxuk iVokj o`Rr vkSj f”kykbZ rglhy ds dksVk ikc iVokj o`Rr A

9.

e.Mh ftyk esa djlksx rglhy dk [kU;ksy&cxM+k iVokj o`Rr] ckyh pkSdh mi rglhy ds

xkMk xkslkbZa] eB;kuh] ?ku;kM+] Fkkph] ckxh] lksexkM+ vkSj [kksykuky iVokj oR`r] i)j

rglhy ds >kjokM+] dqVx<+] xzkeu] nsox<+] VSªyk] jksik] dFkksx] flYg&HkMokuh] gLriqj]

?kejsM vkSj HkVs<+ iVokj o`Rr] Fkqukax rglhy ds fp;w.kh] dkyhikj] ekux<+] Fkkp&cxM+k]

mÙkjh ex: vkSj nf{k.kh ex: iVokj oR`r vkSj lqUnjuxj rglhy dk cVokM+k iVokj o`RrA

Li"Vhdj.k III.—ijUrqd ¼1½ ds iz;kstu ds fy, [email protected] {ks= bl izdkj gksaxs%&

¼i½ mie.My@rglhy eq[;ky; ls 20 fd0eh0 dh ifjf/k ls ijs ds leLr LVs'ku A

¼ii½ leLr eq[;ky; vkSj ftyk eq[;ky;ksa ls 15 fd0eh0 dh ifjf/k ls ijs leLr LVs'ku tgka cl

lsok miYc/k ugha gS vkSj 3 ¼rhu½ fd0eh0 ls vf/kd dh iSny ;k=k djuh iM+rh gS A

¼iii½ deZpkjh dk mlds izoxZ dks /;ku esa yk, fcuk] x`guxj ;k x`guxj ds lkFk yxrk 20

fd0eh0 dh ifjf/k ds Hkhrj dk {ks= A

¼II½ izksUufr ds lHkh ekeyksa esa in ij fu;fer fu;qfDr ls iwoZ lEHkjd ¼iks’kd½ in esa dh xbZ

yxkrkj rnFkZ lsok] ;fn dksbZ gks] izksUufr ds fy, bu fu;eksa esa ;Fkkfofgr lsokdky ds fy,] bl 'krZ ds

v/khu jgrs gq, x.kuk esa yh tk,xh] fd lEHkjd ¼iks’kd½ izoxZ esa rnFkZ fu;qfDr@izksUufr HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr

fu;eksa ds micU/kksa ds vuqlkj p;u dh mfpr Lohdk;Z izfØ;k dks viukus ds Ik'pkr~ dh xbZ Fkh%

¼i½ ijUrq mu lHkh ekeyksa esa ftuesa dksbZ dfu’B O;fDr lEHkjd ¼iks’kd½ in esa vius dqy lsokdky

¼rnFkZ vk/kkj ij dh xbZ rnFkZ lsok lfgr] tks fu;fer lsok@fu;qfDr ds vuqlj.k esa gks½ ds vk/kkj ij

mi;qZDr fufnZ’V micU/kksa ds dkj.k fopkj fd, tkus dk ik= gks tkrk gS] ogka vius&vius

izoxZ@in@dkMj esa mlls ofj"B lHkh O;fDr fopkj fd, tkus ds ik= le>s tk,axs vkSj fopkj djrs

le; dfu"B O;fDr;ksa ls Åij j[ks tk,axs %

ijUrq ;g vkSj fd mu lHkh in/kkfj;ksa dh] ftu ij izksUufr ds fy, fopkj fd;k tkuk gS dh de

ls de rhu o"kZ dh U;wure vgrkZ lsok ;k in ds HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;eksa esa fofgr lsok] tks Hkh de gks]

gksxh%

ijUrq ;g vkSj Hkh fd tgka dksbZ O;fDr iwoZxkeh ijUrqd dh vis{kkvksa ds dkj.k izksUufr fd, tkus

lEcU/kh fopkj ds fy, vik= gks tkrk gS] ogka mlls dfu"B O;fDr Hkh ,slh izksUufr ds fopkj ds fy,

vik= le>k tk,xk@le>s tk,axs A

4789

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

Li"Vhdj.k-&&vfUre ijUrqd ds vUrxrZ dfu"B in/kkjh izksUufr ds fy, vik= ugha le>k tk,xk ;fn

ofj"B vik= O;fDr HkwriwoZ lSfud gS ftls fMeksfcykbZTM vkeZM QksflZl ijlksuy ¼fjtosZ'ku vkWQ

oSdsUlht bu fgekpy LVsV uku VSDuhdy lfoZflt½ #Yt] 1972 ds fu;e&3 ds micU/kksa ds vUrxZr HkrhZ

fd;k x;k gS vkSj buds vUrxZr ojh;rk ykHk fn, x;s gksa ;k ftls ,Dl lfoZleSu ¼fjtosZ'ku vkWQ

oSdsUlht bu nh fgekpy izns'k VsfDudy lfoZflt½ #Yt] 1985 ds fu;e&3 ds micU/kksa ds vUrxZr HkrhZ

fd;k x;k gks vkSj buds vUrxZr ojh;rk ykHk fn, x;s gksA

(ii) blh izdkj LFkkbZdj.k ds lHkh ekeyks eas ,sls in ij fu;fer fu;qfDr@izksUufr ls iwoZ lEHkjd

iks"kd in ij dh xbZ yxkrkj rnFkZ lsok] ;fn dksbZ gks] lsokdky ds fy, x.kuk esa yh tk,xh] ;fn

rnFkZ fu;qfDr@izksUufr mfpr p;u ds Ik'pkr vkSj HkrhZ vkSj izksUufr fu;eksa ds micU/kksa ds vuqlkj dh xbZ

Fkh %

ijUrq dh xbZ mi;qZDr fufnZ"V rnFkZ lsok dks x.kuk esa ysus ds Ik'pkr~ tks LFkk;hdj.k gksxk mlds

QyLo#Ik ikjLifjd ojh;rk vifjofrZr jgsxhA

12- ;fn foHkkxh; izksUufr lfefr fo|eku gks rks mldh lajpuk-&&TkSlh ljdkj }kjk le; le;

ij xfBr dh tk, A

13- HkrhZ djus esa ftu ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa fgekpy izns”k yksd lsok vk;ksx ls ijke”kZ fd;k

tk,xk-&&tSlk fof/k }kjk visf{kr gksA

14- Lkh/kh HkrhZ ds fy, vfuok;Z vis{kk,a-&&Ykkxw ugha A

15- Lkh/kh HkrhZ }kjk in ij p;u-&&Ykkxw ugha A

16 vkj{k.k-&&lsok esa fu;qfDr] fgekpy izns”k ljdkj }kjk] le;&le; ij vuqlwfpr tkfr;ksa@

vuqlwfpr tu tkfr;ksa@vU; fiNMs+ oxksZa vkSj vU; izoxZ ds O;fDr;ksa ds fy, lsokvksa esa vkj{k.k dh ckcr

tkjh fd, x, vkns”kksa ds v/khu gksxhA

17- foHkkxh; ijh{kk-&&ykxw ugha A

18- f”kfFky djus dh “kfDr-&&Tkgka jkT; ljdkj dh ;g jk; gks fd ,slk djuk vko”;d ;k

lehphu gS] ogka og] dkj.kksa dks fyf[kr esa vfHkfyf[kr djds vkSj fgekpy izns”k yksd lsok vk;ksx ds

ijke”kZ ls] vkns”k }kjk] bu fu;eksa ds fdUgha micU/kksa dks fdlh oxZ ;k O;fDr ¼O;fDr;ksa½ ds izoxZ ;k in

¼inksa½ dh ckcr] f”kfFky dj ldsxhA

&&&&&&&&&

[Authoritative English Text of this Department Notification No. Health-A-A(3)-1/99, dated

21-7-2017 as required under clause (3) of Article 348 of the Constitution of India].

HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171002, the 21^st July, 2017

No. Health-A-A(3)-1/99.—In exercise of the powers conferred by proviso to Article 309 of

the Constitution of India, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, in consultation with the Himachal

Pradesh Public Service Commission, is pleased to make the following Recruitment and Promotion

4790

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

Rules for the post of Health Educator, Class-III (Non-Gazetted) in the Department of Health &

Family Welfare, Himachal Pradesh as per Annexure-"A'' attached to this notification, namely :—

1.

Short title and Commencement.—(1) These rules may be called the Himachal

Pradesh, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Health Educator, Class-III (Non-Gazetted)

Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 2017.

(2) These rules shall come into force from the date of publication in the Rajpatra (e-

Gazette) Himachal Pradesh.

2.

Repeal and savings.—(1) The Himachal Pradesh, Department of Health and Family

Welfare, Health Educator, Class-III (Non-Gazetted), Recruitment & Promotion Rules, 1999

notified vide this Department Notification No. Health-A-A(3)-41/96, dated 29 October, 1999 are

hereby repealed.

(2) Notwithstanding such repeal, any appointment made or anything done or any action

taken under the rules, so repealed under sub-rule 2 (1) supra shall be deemed to have been validly

made or done or taken under these rules.

By order,

Sd/-

Pr. Secretary (Health).

__________

ANNEXURE "A"

RECRUITMENT AND PROMOTION RULES FOR THE POST OF HEALTH EDUCATOR

(NON – GAZETTED) CLASS-III, IN THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY

WELFARE, HIMACHAL PRADESH

1.

Name of the post.—Health Educator

2.

Number of post.—99 (Ninety nine)

3.

Classification.—Class-III (Non-Gazetted)

Non- Ministerial Service.

4.

Scale of Pay.—`10300-34800 + ` 4200/- Grade Pay

5.

Whether "Selection" post or "Non- Selection" post.— Not Applicable.

6.

Age for direct recruitment.—Not applicable

7.

Minimum educational and other qualification required for direct recruit(s).—(a)

Essential Qualification.—Not applicable.

(b) Desirable Qualification.—Not applicable.

4791

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

8.

Whether age and educational qualification(s) prescribed for direct recruit(s) will

apply in case of the promotee(s).—

Age.—Not applicable.

Educational qualification.—As prescribed against Column No. 11 below.

9.

Period of probation, if any.—Not applicable.

10.

Method(s) of recruitment, whether by direct recruitment or by promotion/

secondment/transfer and the percentage of post(s) to be filled in by various methods.—100%

by placement, failing which by promotion.

11. In case of recruitment by promotion/secondment/transfer, grade from which

promotion/secondment/transfer is to be made.—By placement from amongst the Male Health

Supervisors/Female Health Supervisors who possess a recognized Diploma in Health Education

with five years regular service or regular combined with continuous adhoc service, if any, in the

grade failing which by promotion from amongst the Male Health Workers/Female Health Workers

who possess a recognized Diploma in Health Education with ten years regular service or regular

combined with continuous adhoc service, if any, in the grade:

Provided that for the purpose of placement/ promotion a combined seniority list of eligible

officials holding the post of Male Health Supervisor/Female Health Supervisor and Male Health

Worker/Female Health Worker on the basis of length of service without disturbing their cadre-wise

inter-se-seniority shall be prepared:

(1) Provided that for the purpose of promotion every employee shall have to serve at least

one term in the Tribal/Difficult/Hard areas and remote/rural areas subject to adequate number of

post (s) available in such areas:

Provided further that the proviso (I) supra shall not be applicable in the case of those

employees who have five years or less service, left for superannuation. However, this condition of

five years shall not be applicable in the cases of promotion:

Provided further that Officer/Official who have not served at least one tenure in Tribal/

Difficult/ Hard areas and remote/rural areas shall be transferred to such area strictly in accordance

with his/ her seniority in the respective cadre.

Explanation I.—For the purpose of proviso-(I) supra the “ term” in Tribal/Difficult/Hard

areas/ remote/ rural areas shall mean normally three years or less period of posting in such areas

keeping in view the administrative exigencies/convenience.

Explanation II.—For the purpose of proviso (I) supra the Tribal/Difficult Area shall be as

under :—

1.

Distt. Lahaul & Spiti.

2.

Pangi and Bharmaur Sub Division of Chamba District.

3

Dodra Kawar Area of Rohru Sub-Division.

4

Pandrah Bis Pargana, Munish Darkali and Gram Panchayat Kashapat, Gram Panchyats

of Rampur Tehsil of District Shimla.

4792

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

5

Pandrah Bis Pargana of Kullu District.

6

Bada Bhangal Area of Baijnath Sub Division of Kangra District.

7

District Kinnaur.

8

Kathwar and Korga Patwar Circles of Kamrau Sub Tehsil, Bhaladh Bhalona and

Sangna Patwar Circles of Renukaji Tehsil and Kota Pab Patwar Circle of Shillai

Tehsil, in Sirmaur District.

9

Khanyol-Bagra Patwar Circle of Karsog Tehsil, Gada-Gussaini, Mathyani, Ghanyar,

Thachi, Baggi Somgad and Kholanal of Bali-Chowki Sub Tehsil, Jharwar, kutgarh,

Graman, Devgarh, Trailla, Ropa, Kathog, Silh-Badhwani, Hastpur, Ghamrehar and

Bhatehar Patwar Circle of Padhar Tehsil, Chiuni, Kalipar, Mangarh, Thach-Bagra,

North Magru and South Magru Patwar Circles of Thunag Tehsil and Batwara Patwar

Circle in Sunder Nager Tehsil in Mandi District.

Explanation III.—For the purpose of proviso (I) supra the Remote / Rural Area shall be as

under:—

(i) All stations beyond the radius of 20 Kms. from Sub Division/Tehsil headquarter.

(ii) All stations beyond the radius of 15 Kms. from State Headquarter and District head

quarters where bus service is not available and on foot journey is more than 3 (three)

Kms.

(iii) Home town or area adjoining to area of home town within the radius of 20 Kms. of the

employee regardless of its category.

(II) In all cases of promotion, the continuous adhoc service rendered in the feeder post if

any, prior to regular appointment to the post shall be taken into account towards the length of

service as prescribed in these rules for promotion subject to the condition that the adhoc

appointment/promotion in the feeder category had been made after following proper acceptable

process of selection in accordance with the provisions of R&P Rules:

(i) Provided that in all cases where a junior person becomes eligible for consideration by

virtue of his /her total length of service (including the service rendered on adhoc basis, followed by

regular service/appointment) in the feeder post in view of the provisions referred to above, all

persons senior to him in the respective category post/ grade shall be deemed to be eligible for

consideration and placed above the junior person in the field of consideration:

Provided that all incumbents to be considered for promotion shall possess the minimum

qualifying service of at least three years or that prescribed in the R & P Rules for the post,

whichever is less:

Provided further that where a person becomes ineligible to be considered for the promotion

on account of the requirements of the preceding proviso, the person (s) junior to him shall also be

deemed to be ineligible for consideration for such promotion.

Explanation.—The last proviso shall not render the junior incumbents ineligible for

consideration for promotion if the senior ineligible persons happened to Ex-servicemen recruited

under the provisions of Rule-3 of the Demobilized Armed Forces Personnel (Reservation of

4793

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

Vacancies in Himachal State Non-Technical Services) Rules, 1972 and having been given the

benefit of seniority thereunder or recruited under the provision of Rule-3 of Ex-Servicemen

(Reservation of Vacancies in the Himachal Pradesh Technical Services) Rules, 1985 and having

been given the benefit of seniority there- under.

(ii) Similarly, in all cases of confirmation, continuous adhoc service rendered on the feeder

post, if any, prior to the regular appointment against such posts shall be taken into account towards

the length of service, if the adhoc appointment/promotion had been made after proper selection and

in accordance with the provision of the Recruitment & Promotion Rules:

Provided that inter-se-seniority as a result of confirmation after taking into account, adhoc

service rendered shall remain unchanged.

12. If a Departmental Promotion Committee exists, what is its composition.—As may

be constituted by the Government from time to time.

13 Circumstances under which the HPPSC is to be consulted in making

recruitment.—As required under the Law.

14 Essential requirement for direct recruitment.—Not applicable.

15 Selection for appointment to post by direct recruitment.—Not applicable.

16. Reservation.—The appointment to the service shall be subject to the orders regarding

reservation in the service for Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribal/Other Backward Classes/other

categories of persons issued by the Himachal Pradesh Government from time to time.

17. Departmental Examination.—Not Applicable.

18. Powers to relax.—Where the State Government is of the opinion that it is necessary or

expedient to do so, it may, by order for reasons to be recorded in writing and in consultation with

the Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission relax any of the provision(s) of these Rules with

respect to any class or category of person (s) or post(s).

__________

CHANGE OF NAME

I have filed a civil suit No. 190-1 of 2014 on 22-08-2014 in the Court of Abha Chauhan,

Civil Judge, Court No. 5, Shimla District Shimla, H.P. for the change of my name from Sant Ram

to Satya Parkash.

Now, the hon'ble Court has passed the order in my favour on 1st may, 2017 for the change

of name. So therefore, all the concerned please note for future.

SATYA PARKASH,

s/o Shri Rewat Singh,

r/o Sumitra Cottage, Shiv Shakti Vihar,

Chhota Shimla, H.P.

4794

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 3 vxLr] 2017@12 Jko.k] 1939

fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr

bysDVªkWfud gLrk{kfjr jkti=] oSclkbV http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in ij miyC/k gS ,oe~ vkWuykbu lR;kfir fd;k tk ldrk gS