jkti=] fgekpy izns'k
fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr
'kfuokj] 5 vxLr] 2017@14 Jko.k] 1939
fgekpy izns'k ljdkj
ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS ORGANIZATION
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 26th July, 2017
No. Per (AR) B(2)1/2017.—Whereas Government of Himachal Pradesh vide notification
No. Per(AR)B(2)1/2017 dated 26th July, 2017 has issued the Terms and Conditions of Services of
State Information Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh under Section 16(5) of the Right to
Information Act, 2005.
Whereas Section 16(5)(b) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 provide for the Salary and
allowances payable and other terms and condition of Services of the State Information
Commissioner being same as that of the Chief Secretary of the State as amended from time to time.
95&jkti=@2017&5&08&2017
¼4819½
4820
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 5 vxLr] 2017@14 Jko.k] 1939
Whereas the pay and allowances of Chief Secretary to the Government of Himachal
Pradesh has increased vide letter No. Karmik (Lekha-B(1)-126/84-III dated 6th April, 2017 of
Department of Personnel (Accounts) from the existing Basic Pay of Rs. 80,000/- to Rs. 2,25,000/-
P.M.
The Governor of Himachal Pradesh is therefore pleased to substitute the existing figures of
(Pay) in Sl. No. 2 of Terms & Condition of State Information Commissioner from Rs. 80,000/- to
Rs. 2,25,000/- in the above mentioned notification dated 26th July, 2017.
By order,
PURNIMA CHAUHAN
Secretary (AR).
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171 001, the 9th May, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2016/Chamba.—Whereas the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Dalhousie, District Chamba has submitted a report as provided under Section 12(4) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri
Kuldeep Kumar s/o Shri Man Singh, r/o Village Adhi, P.O. Bathri, Tehsil Dalhousie, District
Chamba, H.P. and the Executive Officer, Municipal Council, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. as
per demand notice dated 31-07-2014 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding his termination of
services.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub- section-5
of Section-12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above
ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during 09-07-2002
before the above employer after delay of about 12 years and has worked only from 30-04-1998 to
08-07-2002.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for
adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal
Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue:—
4821
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 5 vxLr] 2017@14 Jko.k] 1939
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Kuldeep Kumar s/o Shri Man Singh, r/o
Village Adhi, P.O. Bathri, Tehsil Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. w.e.f. 09-07-2002 by the
Executive Officer, Municipal Council, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P., who has worked
as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his industrial dispute after about 12 years,
allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is
legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of working period from 30-04-1998 to
08-07-2002 and delay of about 12 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employer/management? ”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171 001, the 30th May, 2016
No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Kuldeep Singh s/o Shri Karnail Singh, r/o Village Nera, P.O. Suliali,
Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. and (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D.
Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali,
District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services as daily wages beldar during
October, 1990.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under sub-section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Kuldeep Singh s/o Shri Karnail Singh,
r/o Village Nera, P.O. Suliali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during October, 1990 by
(i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii)
the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., without
complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by workman,
is legal and justified; whereas he has raised the industrial dispute vide demand notice dated
24-11-2013 after lapse of more than 23 years. If not, keeping in view delay of more than 23
4822
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 5 vxLr] 2017@14 Jko.k] 1939
years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers?.”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171 001, the 9th May, 2016
No. 11-1/18(Lab) ID/2016/Sunder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Bhagat Ram s/o Shri Dhiraj Ram, r/o V.P.O. Balag, District Mandi,
H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P.
on the issue of alleged time to time termination of his services during year, 2007 to 26-12- 2014.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether time to time termination of the services of Shri Ludar Mani s/o Shri Durgu Ram,
r/o Village Gahi, P.O. Nagwain, Sub Tehsil Aut, District Mandi, H.P. during year, 2007 to
26-12-2014 (as alleged by workman) by (i) the Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of
Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, District Solan, H.P., (ii) the Associate Director (R&E)
Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Regional Horticulture Research
Station Bajaura, District Kullu, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the
above employer?.”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
4823
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 5 vxLr] 2017@14 Jko.k] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171 001, the 12th May, 2016
No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
exists between Shri Madan Lal s/o Shri Joginder Singh, c/o Shri R.K. Singh Parmar, General
Secretary, Pb. INTUC, L-211, Brari, P.O. Partap Nagar, Tehsil Nangal, District Ropar, Punjab and
Managing Director, M/s Arvind Talwar Machine Tools (P) Limited, V.P.O. Nangal Khurad, Tehsil
Haroli, District Una, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services w.e.f. 01-07-2014 (as
alleged by workman).
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Madan Lal s/o Shri Joginder Singh, c/o Shri
R.K. Singh Parmar, General Secretary, Pb. INTUC, L-211, Brari, P.O. Partap Nagar, Tehsil
Nangal, District Ropar, Punjab w.e.f. 01-07-2014 (as alleged by workman) by the Managing
Director, M/s Arvind Talwar Machine Tools (P) Limited, V.P.O. Nangal Khurad, Tehsil
Haroli, District Una, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?.”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171 001, the 30th May, 2016
No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Manohar Lal s/o Shri Bidhi Chand, r/o Village Meharka, P.O. Danni,
Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. and (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D.
Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali,
District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services as daily wages beldar during
September, 1987.
4824
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 5 vxLr] 2017@14 Jko.k] 1939
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Manohar Lal s/o Shri Bidhi Chand, r/o
Village Meharka, P.O. Danni, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during September, 1987
by (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P.,
(ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.,
without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by
workman, is legal and justified; whereas he has raised the industrial dispute vide demand
notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Dharamshala on 26-10-2013 after lapse of
more than 26 years. If not, keeping in view delay of more than 26 years in raising the
industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers?.”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171 001, the 30th May, 2016
No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Mirchu s/o Shri Badrideen, r/o Village Manor, P.O. Sadwan, Tehsil
Nurpur, Kangra, H.P. and (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur,
District Kangra, H.P., (ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District
Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services as daily wages beldar during June,
1990.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February 2014 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
4825
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 5 vxLr] 2017@14 Jko.k] 1939
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Mirchu s/o Shri Badrideen, r/o Village
Manor, P.O. Sadwan, Tehsil Nurpur, Kangra, H.P. during June, 1990 by (i) the Executive
Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii) the Executive
Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., without complying
with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by workman, is legal
and justified; whereas he has raised the industrial dispute vide demand notice dated 27-07-
2012 after lapse of more than 12 years. If not, keeping in view delay of more than 12 years
in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits
and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers?.”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171 001, the 9th May, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2014/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Munshi Ram s/o Shri Biju, through Shri I.S. Jaryal, General Secretary,
District Committee (AITUC), CHEP Stage-II, Karian P.O. Hardaspura, Tehsil & District Chamba,
H.P. and the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. on the issue of
alleged time to time termination from services as daily wages beldar during February, 1998 to
April, 2005 and year, 2013.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether time to time termination of the services of Shri Munshi Ram s/o Shri Biju,
through Shri I.S. Jaryal, General Secretary, District Committee (AITUC), CHEP Stage-II,
Karian P.O. Hardaspura, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. during January 1999 to 31-08-
2007 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., without
complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If
4826
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 5 vxLr] 2017@14 Jko.k] 1939
not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above worker is entitled to from the above employer?.”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171 001, the 30th May, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2016/Chamba.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Chamba has submitted a report as provided under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Smt. Nain Dei d/o Shri
Paras Ram, r/o Village Hudan, P.O. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. and the Executive
Engineer, Killar Division, I.&P.H./H.P.P.W.D., Killar (Pangi), District Chamba, H.P. as per
demand notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Chamba on 23-06-2012 submitted by the
said ex-worker regarding termination of her services.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub- section-5
of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above
ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during May, 2003
before the above employer after delay of more than 9 years and has worked only for 31, 15, 51, 59,
25 and 10 days during years 1990, 1997, 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2003 respectively.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for
adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal
Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue:—
“Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Nain Dei d/o Shri Paras Ram, r/o Village
Hudan, P.O. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during May, 2003 by the Executive
Engineer, Killar Division, I. &P.H./H.P.P.W.D., Killar (Pangi), District Chamba, H.P., who
has worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised her industrial dispute vide demand
notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Chamba on 23-06-2012 after more than 9
years, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of working period of 31, 15, 51, 59, 25 and 10
4827
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 5 vxLr] 2017@14 Jko.k] 1939
days during years 1990,1997, 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2003 respectively and delay of more
than 9 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management?. ”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 9th May, 2016
No. 11-1/7(Lab) ID/2016/Joginder Nagar.—Whereas the Labour Inspector-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Joginder Nagar has submitted a report as provided under Section-12(4) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri
Nanak Chand s/o Shri Khiyali Ram, r/o Village Khroh, P.O. Sadhot, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District
Mandi, H.P. and (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.,
(ii) the Executive Engineer, B&R Division H.P.P.W.D. Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. as per
demand notice dated 18-03-2014 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding his termination of
services.
Whereas, the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub-section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above ex-
worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during August, 2002
before the above employer after delay of more than 11 years and has worked only for May, 1997 to
August, 2002.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for
adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal
Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue:—
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Nanak Chand s/o Shri Khiyali Ram, r/o
Village Khroh, P.O. Sadhot, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. during August, 2002 by
(i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P., (ii) the
4828
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 5 vxLr] 2017@14 Jko.k] 1939
Executive Engineer, B&R Division H.P.P.W.D. Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P., who has
worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his industrial dispute after more than
11 years, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of working period from May, 1997 to
August, 2002 and delay of more than 11 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount
of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employers?. ”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171 001, the 17th May, 2016
No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Naresh Kumar s/o Shri Sadhu Ram, r/o Village Lakhwal, P.O. Sadwan,
Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. and (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D.
Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali,
District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services as daily wages beldar during
March, 1992.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under sub-section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Naresh Kumar s/o Shri Sadhu Ram,
r/o Village Lakhwal, P.O. Sadwan, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during March,
1992 by (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District Kangra,
H.P., (ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra,
H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged
by workman, is legal and justified; whereas he has raised the industrial dispute vide demand
notice dated 03-04-2014 after lapse of more than 22 years. If not, keeping in view delay of
more than 22 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority,
4829
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 5 vxLr] 2017@14 Jko.k] 1939
past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employers?.”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171 001, the 12th May, 2016
No. 11-3/93(Lab)ID/2016/Kullu.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
exists between of Shri Om Chand s/o Shri Biru Ram, r/o Village Jhiri, P.O. Nagwain, Sub Tehsil
Aut, District Mandi, H.P. and (i) the Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and
Forestry, Nauni, District Solan, H.P., (ii) the Associate Director (R&E) Dr. Y.S. Parmar University
of Horticulture and Forestry, Regional Horticulture Research Station Bajaura, District Kullu, H.P.
on the issue of alleged time to time termination of his services during year, 2001 to 26-12-2014.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether time to time termination of the services of Shri Om Chand s/o Shri Biru Ram,
r/o Village Jhiri, P.O. Nagwain, Sub Tehsil Aut, District Mandi, H.P. during year, 2001 to
26-12-2014 (as alleged by workman) by (i) the Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of
Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, District Solan, H.P., (ii) the Associate Director (R&E) Dr.
Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Regional Horticulture Research
Station Bajaura, District Kullu, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the
above employer?.”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
4830
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 5 vxLr] 2017@14 Jko.k] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 9th May, 2016
No. 11-3/93(Lab)ID/2016/Kullu.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
exists between of Shri Om Chand s/o Shri Lot Ram, r/o Village Jhiri, P.O. Nagwain, Sub Tehsil
Aut, District Mandi, H.P. and (i) the Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and
Forestry, Nauni, District Solan, H.P., (ii) the Associate Director (R&E) Dr. Y.S. Parmar University
of Horticulture and Forestry, Regional Horticulture Research Station Bajaura, District Kullu, H.P.
on the issue of alleged time to time termination of his services during year, 2003 to June, 2013 and
finally during July, 2013.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether time to time termination of the services of Shri Om Chand s/o Shri Lot Ram, r/o
Village Jhiri, P.O. Nagwain, Sub-Tehsil Aut, District Mandi, H.P. during year, 2003 to
June, 2013 and finally during July, 2013 (as alleged by workman) by (i) the Registrar, Dr.
Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, District Solan, H.P., (ii) the
Associate Director (R&E) Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry,
Regional Horticulture Research Station Bajaura, District Kullu, H.P., without complying
with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what
amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker
is entitled to from the above employer?.”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171 001, the 18th May, 2016
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2016/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Parmanand s/o Shri Nainan Chand, r/o Village Banouni, P.O. Bhatehar,
4831
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 5 vxLr] 2017@14 Jko.k] 1939
Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. and Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder
Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of alleged time to time termination from services as daily
wages beldar during March, 1997 to year, 2012 and finally during year, 2012.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February 2014 and as per
power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether time to time termination of the services of Shri Parmanand s/o Shri Nainan
Chand, r/o Village Banouni, P.O. Bhatehar, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. during
March, 1997 to year, 2012 and finally during year, 2012 by the Divisional Forest Officer,
Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P., without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled
to from the above employer?.”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171 001, the 30th May, 2016
No.11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Pradeep Kumar s/o Shri Soohdu Ram, r/o V.P.O. Sadwan (Manohra),
Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. and (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D.
Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali,
District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services as daily wages beldar during
June, 1990.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February 2014 and as per
4832
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 5 vxLr] 2017@14 Jko.k] 1939
power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Pradeep Kumar s/o Shri Soohdu Ram,
r/o V.P.O. Sadwan (Manohra), Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during June, 1990 by
(i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii)
the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., without
complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by workman,
is legal and justified; whereas he has raised the industrial dispute vide demand notice dated
26-04-2013 after lapse of more than 12 years. If not, keeping in view delay of more than 12
years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers?.”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FORM-6
(See rule-9)
NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF EXISTING LANDUSE MAP
Shimla, the 3rd August, 2017
No. HIM/TP/PJT/PA-Baijnath-Paprola/2013/Vol-I/3896-3923.—Whereas, objections
and suggestions were invited vide Notice No. HIM/TP/PJT/PA- Baijnath-Paprola/2013/Vol-
I/18249-66 dated 26-12-2016 with respect to the Existing Land Use Map for Baijnath-Paprola
Planning Area under sub-section (1) of section 15 of the Himachal Pradesh Town and Country
Planning Act, 1977 (Act No. 12 of 1977); and
Whereas, objections and suggestions were received and the modifications have been made
in the said Existing Land Use Map, wherever, required.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers vested under sub-section (3) of section 15 of the
Act ibid, Notice is given that the Existing Land Use Map for Baijnath-Paprola Planning Area is
hereby adopted without modifications and a copy thereof is available for inspection during office
hours in the following offices:—
1. The Director,
Town and Country Planning Department,
Nagar Yojana Bhawan, Block No. 32-A, Vikas Nagar,
Kasumpati, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh-171009.
2. The Planning Officers,
Town Planning Office,
Palampur, District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh.
4833
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 5 vxLr] 2017@14 Jko.k] 1939
3. The Secretary,
Nagar Panchayat Baijnath-Paprola,
District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh.
The said Existing Land Use Map shall come into operation with effect from the date of
publication of this Notice in the Official Gazette of Himachal Pradesh and it shall be conclusive
evidence of the fact that the Map has been duly prepared and adopted.
Place: Shimla
Date: 3-8-2017.
Sd/-
SANDEEP KUMAR,
Director,
Town and Country Planning Department.
4834
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 5 vxLr] 2017@14 Jko.k] 1939
fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr
bysDVªkWfud gLrk{kfjr jkti=] oSclkbV http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in ij miyC/k gS ,oe~ vkWuykbu lR;kfir fd;k tk ldrk gS