jkti=] fgekpy izns'k
fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr
eaxyokj] 8 vxLr] 2017@17 Jko.k] 1939
fgekpy izns'k ljdkj
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171 001, the 13th May, 2016
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2016/Mandi.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Mandi has submitted a report as provided under Section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri Prem Singh s/o Late
Shri Durga Dass, r/o Village Nagahu, P.O. Kao, Tehsil Karsog, District Mandi, H.P. and the Senior
Executive Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B.L., Karsog, District Mandi, H.P. as per demand
notice dated 12-09-2014 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding his termination of services.
96&jkti=@2017&8&08&2017
¼4835½
4836
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 vxLr] 2017@17 Jko.k] 1939
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided uder sub- section-5 of
Section-12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above ex-
worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services w.e.f. 14-02-1993
before the above employer after delay of more than 21 years and has worked only for 28, 115 and
19 days during years 1991, 1992 and 1993 respectively.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for
adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal
Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue:—
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Prem Singh s/o Late Shri Durga Dass, r/o
Village Nagahu, P.O. Kao, Tehsil Karsog, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 14-02-1993 by the
Senior Executive Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B.L. Karsog, District Mandi, H.P.,
who has worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his industrial dispute after
more than 21 years, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of working period of 28,
115 and 19 days during years 1991, 1992 and 1993 respectively and delay of more than 21
years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management? ”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171 001, the 17th May, 2016
No.11-5/99(Lab)ID/2016/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Rajdeen s/o Shri Noor Mohammad, r/o Village Saloh, P.O. Jassurgarh,
Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Chamba Forest Division,
Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. on the issue of alleged time to time termination from services as
daily wages beldar during February, 2001 to August, 2014.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
4837
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 vxLr] 2017@17 Jko.k] 1939
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February 2014 and as per
power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether time to time termination of the services of Shri Rajdeen s/o Shri Noor
Mohammad, r/o Village Saloh, P.O. Jassurgarh, Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, H.P.
during February, 2001 to August, 2014 by the Divisional Forest Officer, Chamba Forest
Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the
above employer?.”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171 001, the 13th May, 2016
No. 11-23/84 (Lab) ID/2016/Mandi.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Mandi has submitted a report as provided under Section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri Rajinder Singh s/o
Shri Bhag Singh, r/o Village Darkoly, P.O. Paunta, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. and the
Senior Executive Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B.L., Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. as
per demand notice dated 22-09-2014 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding his termination of
services.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub- section 5
of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above
ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services w.e.f. 02-02-1998
before the above employer after delay of more than 16 years and has worked only for 159, 207, 58,
45, 50 and 18 days during years 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998 respectively.
4838
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 vxLr] 2017@17 Jko.k] 1939
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for
adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal
Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue:—
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Rajinder Singh s/o Shri Bhag Singh, r/o
Village Darkoly, P.O. Paunta, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 02-02-1998 by
the Executive Engineer, H.P.S.E.B.L. Division Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P., who has
worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his industrial dispute after more than
16 years, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of working period of 159, 207, 58, 45, 50
and 18 days during years 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998 respectively and delay of
more than 16 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority,
past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management?. ”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171 001, the 18th May, 2016
No. 11-1/11(Lab)ID/2016/Nurpur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Rajneesh Pathania s/o Shri Janak Singh, r/o V.P.O. Makdoli, Tehsil
Indora, District Kangra, H.P. and the General Manager, M/s I.D. Sood Ispat Private Limited,
V.P.O. Kandrori, Tehsil Indora, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his
services w.e.f. 02-11-2013.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Rajneesh Pathania s/o Shri Janak Singh, r/o
V.P.O. Makdoli, Tehsil Indora, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 02-11-2013 by the General
Manager, M/s I.D. Sood Ispat Private Limited, V.P.O. Kandrori, Tehsil Indora, District
4839
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 vxLr] 2017@17 Jko.k] 1939
Kangra, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is
legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 30th May, 2016
No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Ratan Chand s/o Shri Phinu Ram, r/o Village Sanjoor, P.O. Kherian,
Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. and (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D.
Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali,
District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services as daily wages beldar during
October, 1999.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Ratan Chand s/o Shri Phinu Ram, r/o
Village Sanjoor, P.O. Kherian, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during October, 1999
by (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P.
(ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.,
without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by
workman, is legal and justified; whereas he has raised the industrial dispute vide demand
notice dated 26-11-2013 after lapse of more than 14 years. If not, keeping in view delay of
more than 14 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority,
past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employers?”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
4840
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 vxLr] 2017@17 Jko.k] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 18th May, 2016
No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
exists between Shri Roshan Lal s/o Shri Moola Singh, c/o Shri R.K. Singh Parmar, General
Secretary, Pb. INTUC, L-211, Brari, P.O. Partap Nagar, Tehsil Nangal, District Roper, Punjab and
Managing Director, M/s Arvind Talwar Machine Tools (P) Limited, V.P.O. Nangal Khurad, Tehsil
Haroli, District Una, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services w.e.f. 01-07-2014 (as
alleged by workman).
As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Roshan Lal s/o Shri Moola Singh, c/o Shri
R.K. Singh Parmar, General Secretary, Pb. INTUC, L-211, Brari, P.O. Partap Nagar, Tehsil
Nangal, District Roper, Punjab w.e.f. 01-07-2014 (as alleged by workman) by the Managing
Director, M/s Arvind Talwar Machine Tools (P) Limited, V.P.O. Nangal Khurad, Tehsil
Haroli, District Una, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 30th May, 2016
No. 11-2/86(Lab)ID/2016/Bilaspur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Sada Ram s/o Shri Mansha Ram, r/o Village Tundwin, P.O. Tantha,
Tehsil Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, H.P. and the Additional Superintending Engineer, Electrical
Division, H.P.S.E.B. Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from
services as daily wages beldar w.e.f. 01-04-1988.
4841
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 vxLr] 2017@17 Jko.k] 1939
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under sub-section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Sada Ram s/o Shri Mansha Ram, r/o
Village Tundwin, P.O. Tantha, Tehsil Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, H.P. w.e.f. 01-04-1988
by the Additional Superintending Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B. Ghumarwin,
District Bilaspur, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947, as alleged by workman, is legal and justified; whereas he has raised the industrial
dispute vide demand notice dated 26-10-2014 after lapse of more than 26 years. If not,
keeping in view delay of more than 26 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount
of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 30th May, 2016
No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
exists between Shri Sandeep Kumar s/o Shri Om Prakash, c/o Shri R.K. Singh Parmar, General
Secretary, Pb. INTUC, L-211, Brari, P.O. Partap Nagar, Tehsil Nangal, District Ropar, Punjab and
Managing Director, M/s Arvind Talwar Machine Tools (P) Limited, V.P.O. Nangal Khurad, Tehsil
Haroli, District Una, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services w.e.f. 01-07-2014 (as
alleged by workman).
As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
4842
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 vxLr] 2017@17 Jko.k] 1939
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Sandeep Kumar s/o Shri Om Prakash, c/o Shri
R.K. Singh Parmar, General Secretary, Pb. INTUC, L-211, Brari, P.O. Partap Nagar, Tehsil
Nangal, District Ropar, Punjab w.e.f. 01-07-2014 (as alleged by workman) by the Managing
Director, M/s Arvind Talwar Machine Tools (P) Limited, V.P.O. Nangal Khurad, Tehsil
Haroli, District Una, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 12th May, 2016
No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
exists between Shri Sanjeev Dhiman s/o Shri Ram Parkash, c/o Shri R.K. Singh Parmar, General
Secretary, Pb. INTUC, L-211, Brari, P.O. Partap Nagar, Tehsil Nangal, District Roper, Punjab and
Managing Director, M/s Arvind Talwar Machine Tools (P) Limited, V.P.O. Nangal Khurad, Tehsil
Haroli, District Una, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services w.e.f. 01-07-2014 (as
alleged by workman).
As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Sanjeev Dhiman s/o Shri Ram Parkash, c/o
Shri R.K. Singh Parmar, General Secretary, Pb. INTUC, L-211, Brari, P.O. Partap Nagar,
Tehsil Nangal, District Roper, Punjab w.e.f. 01-07-2014 (as alleged by workman) by the
Managing Director, M/s Arvind Talwar Machine Tools (P) Limited, V.P.O. Nangal Khurad,
Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above
employer?”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
4843
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 vxLr] 2017@17 Jko.k] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 18th May, 2016
No. 11-1/11(Lab)ID/2016/Nurpur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Satpal Singh s/o Shri Pratap Singh, r/o Village Jol, P.O. Bhali, Tehsil
Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. and the General Manager, M/s I.D. Sood Ispat Private Limited,
V.P.O. Kandrori, Tehsil Indora, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his
services w.e.f. 02-11-2013.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Satpal Singh s/o Shri Pratap Singh, r/o Village
Jol, P.O. Bhali, Tehsil Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 02-11-2013 by the General
Manager, M/s I.D. Sood Ispat Private Limited, V.P.O. Kandrori, Tehsil Indora, District
Kangra, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is
legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 30th May, 2016
No. 11-1/11(Lab)ID/2016/Nurpur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Sham Lal s/o Shri Divan Chand, r/o Village Kardial, P.O. Pharian,
Tehsil Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. and Shri Arun Mahajan, Proprietor of Suvidha Gas Service,
Bharat Gas Distributors, Main Bazar Jawali, Tehsil Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of
alleged termination of his services during April, 2014
4844
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 vxLr] 2017@17 Jko.k] 1939
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Sham Lal s/o Shri Divan Chand, r/o Village
Kardial, P.O. Pharian, Tehsil Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. during April, 2014 by Shri Arun
Mahajan, Proprietor of Suvidha Gas Service, Bharat Gas Distributors, Main Bazar Jawali,
Tehsil Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above
employer?”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 30th May, 2016
No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Sham Lal s/o Shri Girdhari Lal, r/o V.P.O. Kopra, Tehsil Nurpur,
District Kangra, H.P. and (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District
Kangra, H.P., (ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra,
H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services as daily wages beldar during September,
1988.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
4845
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 vxLr] 2017@17 Jko.k] 1939
“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Sham Lal s/o Shri Girdhari Lal, r/o
V.P.O. Kopra, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during September, 1988 by (i) the
Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii) the
Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., without
complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by workman,
is legal and justified; whereas he has raised the industrial dispute vide demand notice dated
nil received in Labour Office Kangra during year, 2014 after lapse of about 26 years. If not,
keeping in view delay of about 26 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employers?”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 30th May, 2016
No. 11-1/18 (Lab) ID/2016/Sunder Nagar.—Whereas the Labour Inspector-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Sunder Nagar has submitted a report as provided under Section 12(4) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri
Som Krishan Sharma s/o Late Shri Khub Ram, r/o Village Marola, P.O. Khira, Tehsil Karsog,
District Mandi, H.P. and the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Karsog, District Mandi, H.P. as
per demand notice dated 01-10-2013 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding his termination of
services.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub-section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above ex-
worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services w.e.f. 01-08-1991
before the above employer after delay of more than 22 years and has worked only from 21-01-1998
to 31-07-1991 respectively.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
4846
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 vxLr] 2017@17 Jko.k] 1939
“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Som Krishan Sharma s/o Late Shri
Khub Ram, r/o Village Marola, P.O. Khira, Tehsil Karsog, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 01-
08-1991 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Karsog, District Mandi, H.P.,
without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by
workman, is legal and justified; whereas he has raised the industrial dispute vide demand
notice dated 01-10-2013 after lapse of more than 22 years. If not, keeping in view delay of
more than 22 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority,
past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employer?”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 30th May, 2016
No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Subhash Singh s/o Shri Fateh Singh, r/o Village Nera, P.O. Suliali,
Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. and (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D.
Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali,
District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services as daily wages beldar during
September, 1987.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Subhash Singh s/o Shri Fateh Singh,
r/o Village Nera, P.O. Suliali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during September, 1987
by (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P.
(ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.,
without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by
workman, is legal and justified; whereas he has raised the industrial dispute vide demand
notice dated 24-11-2013 after lapse of more than 26 years. If not, keeping in view delay of
more than 26 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority,
4847
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 vxLr] 2017@17 Jko.k] 1939
past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employers?”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 9th May, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2016/Chamba.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Chamba has submitted a report as provided under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri Tilak Raj s/o Shri
Ronki Ram, r/o Village Kharnala, P.O. Taretha, Tehsil Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. and the
Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. as per demand notice
dated 09-07-2010 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding his termination of services.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub-section 5 of
Section-12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above ex-
worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services w.e.f. 26-11-2000
before the above employer after delay of more than 9 years and has worked only for 147, 311, 302,
308, 323, 341 and 313 days during the years 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 and 2000
respectively.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for
adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal
Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue:—
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Tilak Raj s/o Shri Ronki Ram, r/o Village
Kharnala, P.O. Taretha, Tehsil Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. w.e.f. 26-11-2000 by the
Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P., who has worked
as beldar on daily wages basis only for 147, 311, 302, 308, 323, 341 and 313 days during
the years 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 and 2000 respectively and has raised his
industrial dispute demand notice dated 09-07-2010 after delay of more than 9 years,
allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is
4848
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 vxLr] 2017@17 Jko.k] 1939
legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of working period stated above and delay of
more than 9 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority,
past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management? ”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 12th May, 2016
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2016/Mandi.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Mandi has submitted a report as provided under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri Tara Chand s/o Shri
Gokal Ram, r/o Village Parsh, P.O. Balag, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. and the
Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. as per demand
notice dated 21-07-2014 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding his termination of services.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub- section-5
of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above
ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during August,
2009 before the above employer after delay of more than 4 years and has worked only for 25, 23,
80, 30 and 28 days during the years 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2009 respectively.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for
adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal
Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue:—
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Tara Chand s/o Shri Gokal Ram, r/o
Village Parsh, P.O. Balag, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. during August, 2009
by the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P.,
who has worked as beldar on daily wages basis only for 25, 23, 80, 30 and 28 days during
the years 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2009 respectively and has raised his industrial dispute
demand notice dated 21-07-2014 after delay of more than 4 years, allegedly without
4849
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 vxLr] 2017@17 Jko.k] 1939
complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If
not, keeping in view of working period stated above and delay of more than 4 years in
raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits
and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/
management? ”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 13th May, 2016
No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
exists between Shri Vijay Kumar s/o Shri Hans Raj c/o Shri R.K. Singh Parmar, General Secretary,
Pb. INTUC, L-211, Brari, P.O. Partap Nagar, Tehsil Nangal, District Ropar, Punjab and Managing
Director, M/s Arvind Talwar Machine Tools (P) Limited, V.P.O. Nangal Khurad, Tehsil Haroli,
District Una, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services w.e.f. 01-07-2014 (as alleged
by workman).
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that t his
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Vijay Kumar s/o Shri Hans Raj c/o Shri R.K.
Singh Parmar, General Secretary, Pb. INTUC, L-211, Brari, P.O. Partap Nagar, Tehsil
Nangal, District Ropar, Punjab w.e.f. 01-07-2014 (as alleged by workman) by the Managing
Director, M/s Arvind Talwar Machine Tools (P) Limited, V.P.O. Nangal Khurad, Tehsil
Haroli, District Una, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
4850
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 vxLr] 2017@17 Jko.k] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171 001, the 30th May, 2016
No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Vijay Kumar s/o Shri Dharam Singh, r/o Village Ghali, Tehsil Nurpur,
Kangra, H.P. and (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District
Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra,
H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services as daily wages beldar during October, 1989.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Vijay Kumar s/o Shri Dharam Singh,
r/o Village Ghali, Tehsil Nurpur, Kangra, H.P. during October, 1989 by (i) the Executive
Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive
Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., without complying
with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by workman, is legal
and justified; whereas he has raised the industrial dispute vide demand notice dated 24-11-
2013 after lapse of more than 24 years. If not, keeping in view delay of more than 24 years
in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits
and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers?”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 30th May, 2016
No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Yash Pal s/o Shri Ranjit Singh, r/o Village Hatli, P.O. Suliali, Tehsil
Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. and (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D.
Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali,
District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services as daily wages beldar during
September, 1987.
4851
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 vxLr] 2017@17 Jko.k] 1939
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Yash Pal s/o Shri Ranjit Singh, r/o
Village Hatli, P.O. Suliali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during September, 1987 by
(i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii)
the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., without
complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by workman,
is legal and justified; whereas he has raised the industrial dispute vide demand notice dated
15-12-2011 after lapse of more than 24 years. If not, keeping in view delay of more than 24
years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service
benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers?”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
__________
c vnkyr dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh] ikaoVk lkfgc] ftyk fljekSj] fgekpy izns'k
Jh ujsUnz flag iq= Jh nhoku flag] fuoklh esgjM+] rglhy ikaoVk lkfgc] ftyk fljekSj
--oknhA
cuke
vke turk
- - izfroknhA
vuqoku eqdíek % izkFkZuk&i= tsj /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969-
Jh ujsUnz flag iq= Jh nhoku flag] fuoklh esgjM+] rglhy ikaoVk lkfgc] ftyk fljekSj us ,d
izkFkZuk&i= izLrqr djds fuosnu fd;k gS fd vkosnd fdUgha dkj.kksa ls vius y{eh nsoh dh e`R;q dh frfFk
08&03&2008 dk bUnzkt fu/kkZfjr vof/k ds vUnj lEcfU/kr xzke iapk;r@uxj ikfydk ifj"kn~ esa ntZ
ugha djok ik;k gSA bl ckjs vkosnd }kjk ,d C;ku gYQh Hkh is'k fd;k x;k gS rFkk bl lEcU/k esa nks
xokgksa ds 'kiFk&i= Hkh vkosnd us vius izkFkZuk&i= ds lkFk layXu fd;s gSaA vkosnd us xzke
iapk;r@uxj ikfydk ifj"kn~ iMnquh esa vius Åij of.kZr y{eh nsoh dh e`R;q frfFk 08&03&2008 dks
ntZ djus dk vuqjks/k fd;k gSA
vr% bl b'rgkj }kjk vke turk dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh Hkh O;fDr dks
y{eh nsoh dh e`R;qfrfFk xzke iapk;r@uxj ikfydk ifj"kn~ iMnquh rglhy ikaoVk lkfgc esa ntZ djus
ckjs dksbZ ,rjkt gks rks og fefr &&&&&&&&&&&& dks ;k blls iwoZ gekjs U;k;ky; esa gkftj gksdj
fyf[kr vFkok ekSf[kd ,rjkt is'k dj ldrk gSA mDr fuf'pr frfFk ds ckn dksbZ Hkh ,rjkt ekU; ugha
gksxk vkSj le>k tk;sxk fd mDr y{eh nsoh dh e`R;q frfFk dks lEcfU/kr xzke iapk;r@uxj ikfydk
4852
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 vxLr] 2017@17 Jko.k] 1939
ifj"kn~ esa ntZ djus ckjs fdlh dks dksbZ ,rjkt ugha gS rFkk fu;ekuqlkj tUe frfFk iathdj.k ds vkns'k
tkjh dj fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad &&&&&&&&&&&&&& dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]
ikaoVk lkfgc] ftyk fljekSj ¼fg0 iz0½A
&&&&&&&&
c vnkyr dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh] ikaoVk lkfgc] ftyk fljekSj] fgekpy izns'k
Jherh Palgun iq= Jh Phurdun] fuoklh H. No.-37, Tibeten Cholsum Settlement Bhuppur,
rglhy ikaoVk lkfgc] ftyk fljekSj
--oknhA
cuke
vke turk
- - izfroknhA
muoku eqdíek % izkFkZuk&i= tsj /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969-
Jherh Palgun iq= Jh Phurdun] fuoklh H. No.-37, Tibtetein Cholsum Settement Bhuppur,
rglhy ikaoVk lkfgc] ftyk fljekSj us ,d izkFkZuk&i= izLrqr djds fuosnu fd;k gS fd vkosnd fdUgha
dkj.kksa ls vius Wangdi dh e`R;q frfFk 10&07&1988 dk bUnzkt fu/kkZfjr vof/k ds vUnj lEcfU/kr xzke
iapk;r@uxjikfydk ifj"kn~ esa ntZ ugha djok ik;k gSA bl ckjs vkosnd }kjk ,d C;ku gYQh Hkh is'k
fd;k x;k gS rFkk bl lEcU/k esa nks xokgksa ds 'kiFk&i= Hkh vkosnd us vius izkFkZuk&i= ds lkFk layXu
fd;s gSaA vkosnd us xzke iapk;r@uxjikfydk ifj"kn~ Bhattanwali esa vius Åij of.kZr Wangdi dh
e`R;q frfFk 10&07&1988 dks ntZ djus dk vuqjks/k fd;k gSA
vr% bl b'rgkj }kjk vke turk dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh Hkh O;fDr dks
Wangdi dh e`R;q frfFk xzke iapk;r@uxjikfydk ifj"kn~ Bhattanwali] rglhy ikaoVk lkfgc esa ntZ
djus ckjs dksbZ ,rjkt gks rks og fefr &&&&&&&&&&&&& dks ;k blls iwoZ gekjs U;k;ky; esa gkftj
gksdj fyf[kr vFkok ekSf[kd ,rjkt is'k dj ldrk gSA mDr fuf'pr frfFk ds ckn dksbZ Hkh ,rjkt ekU;
ugha gksxk vkSj le>k tk;sxk fd mDr Wangdi dh e`R;q frfFk dks lEcfU/kr xzke iapk;r@uxjikfydk
ifj"kn~ esa ntZ djus ckjs fdlh dks dksbZ ,rjkt ugha gS rFkk fu;ekuqlkj tUe frfFk iathdj.k ds vkns'k
tkjh dj fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 27&07&2017 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]
ikaoVk lkfgc] ftyk fljekSj ¼fg0 iz0½A
4853
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 vxLr] 2017@17 Jko.k] 1939
c vnkyr dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh] ikaoVk lkfgc] ftyk fljekSj] fgekpy izns'k
Jh vlhQ vyh iq= Jh euoj vyh] fuoklh esfy;ks ¼ektjk½+] rglhy ikaoVk lkfgc] ftyk fljekSj
--oknhA
cuke
vke turk
- - izfroknhA
vuqoku eqdíek % izkFkZuk&i= tsj /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969-
Jh vlhQ vyh iq= Jh euoj vyh] fuoklh esfy;ks ¼ektjk½+] rglhy ikaoVk lkfgc] ftyk fljekSj
us ,d izkFkZuk&i= izLrqr djds fuosnu fd;k gS fd vkosnd fdUgha dkj.kksa ls mldh tUe frfFk
24&01&1999 dk bUnzkt fu/kkZfjr vof/k ds vUnj lEcfU/kr xzke iapk;r@uxj ikfydk ifj"kn~ esa ntZ
ugha djok ik;k gSA bl ckjs vkosnd }kjk ,d C;ku gYQh Hkh is'k fd;k x;k gS rFkk bl lEcU/k esa nks
xokgksa ds 'kiFk&i= Hkh vkosnd us vius izkFkZuk&i= ds lkFk layXu fd;s gSaA vkosnd us xzke
iapk;r@uxj ikfydk ifj"kn~ ektjk esa viuh tUe frfFk 24&01&1999 dks ntZ djus dk vuqjks/k fd;k
gSA
vr% bl b'rgkj }kjk vke turk dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh Hkh O;fDr dks
Jh vlhQ vyh dh tUe frfFk xzke iapk;r@uxj ikfydk ifj"kn~ ektjk] rglhy ikaoVk lkfgc esa ntZ
djus ckjs dksbZ ,rjkt gks rks og fefr &&&&&&&&&&&& dks ;k blls iwoZ gekjs U;k;ky; esa gkftj
gksdj fyf[kr vFkok ekSf[kd ,rjkt is'k dj ldrk gSA mDr fuf'pr frfFk ds ckn dksbZ Hkh ,rjkt ekU;
ugha gksxk vkSj le>k tk;sxk fd mDr Jh vlhQ vyh dh tUe frfFk dks lEcfU/kr xzke iapk;r@uxj
ikfydk ifj"kn~ esa ntZ djus ckjs fdlh dks dksbZ ,rjkt ugha gS rFkk fu;ekuqlkj tUe frfFk iathdj.k ds
vkns'k tkjh dj fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad &&&&&&&&&&&&&& dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]
ikaoVk lkfgc] ftyk fljekSj ¼fg0 iz0½A
__________
In the Court of Shri Ashutosh Garg, I.A.S., Sub Divisional Magistrate Nalagarh,
District Solan (H.P.) exercising the powers of Marriage Officer
under Special Marriage Act, 1954
Case No. : ..../ 2017 Date of Inst. : 15-07-2017
Pending for : 17-08-2017
Notice u/s 15 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 inviting the objections of the General
Public for registration of marriage.
Notice to the General Public.
Whereas, Shri Sanjeev Kumar s/o Shri Mangat Ram, r/o Ward No. 1 Baddi, Tehsil Baddi,
District Solan, H. P. and Smt. Neha d/o Sh. Rajinder Kumar and w/o Sh. Sanjeev Kumar, r/o Ward
No. 1 Baddi, Tehsil Baddi, District Solan (H.P.) has moved an application u/s 15 of the Special
Marriage Act, 1954 for registration of their marriage that was solemnized on 07-11-2013;
And whereas both these applicants have submitted in their application and in their affidavits
that they were unmarried at the present time of solemnization of their marriage and were major in
4854
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 8 vxLr] 2017@17 Jko.k] 1939
age and having no prohibited relations to each other debarring them to marry each other. Both the
applicants have requested for registration of their marriage.
Therefore, by this notice the public in General is informed that if any one has any objection
regarding registration of this marriage, he may present before this court on or before 17-08-2017
for hearing of objections if any. In case no objection is received by dated 17-08-2017, it will be
presumed that there is no objection to the registration of the above said marriage and the same will
be registered on the said date.
Given under my hand and seal of the court on 17-07-2017.
Seal.
Sd/-
Marriage Officer-cum- SDM,
Nalagarh, District Solan, H. P.
fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr
bysDVªkWfud gLrk{kfjr jkti=] oSclkbV http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in ij miyC/k gS ,oe~ vkWuykbu lR;kfir fd;k tk ldrk gS