jkti=] fgekpy izns'k

fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr

lkseokj] 14 vxLr] 2017@23 Jko.k] 1939

fgekpy izns'k ljdkj

FOOD, CIVIL SUPPLIES & CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-9, the …… July, 2016

No. FDS-H(B)2-11/2014.—In exercise of the powers conferred upon me under clause 2 (h)

of the H.P.Trade Article (Licensing and Control) Order, 1981 and under clause 2 (g) of the H.P.

Specified Articles (Regulation of Distribution) Order, 2003, I, Vivek Bhatia (I.A.S.), Director,

100&jkti=@2017&14&08&2017

¼4921½

4922

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 14 vxLr] 2017@23 Jko.k] 1939

Food, Civil Supplies & Consumer Affairs, H.P. hereby authorize Shri Sandeep Bhardwaj, Food &

Supplies Officer, Chamba as Licensing Authority and Controller respectively to exercise all the

powers of the Licensing Authority and Controller under the orders referred supra within the

territorial jurisdiction of Chamba district till the posting/appointment of the District Controller

Food, Civil Supplies & Consumer Affairs, Chamba with immediate effect.

By order,

(VIVEK BHATIA) I.A.S.

Director,

Food, Civil Supplies & Consumer Affairs, H.P., Shimla-9.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 11th April, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2015/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute exists between Shri Anil Kumar s/o Shri Tek Chand, r/o Village Behi, P.O. Koti, Tehsil &

District Chamba, H.P. and (i) the Employer/Managing Director, M/s GVK Emergency

Management and Research Institute, Dharampur, District Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer) (ii) the

Managing Director, M/S Adecco Flexione Workforce Solutions Private Limited, C-127, Basement

Level, Satguru Infotech, Phase-VIII, Industrial Area Mohali, Punjab (Contractor Company), on the

issue of alleged termination of his services w.e.f. 10-02-2014.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per

power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted

under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether termination of the services of Shri Anil Kumar s/o Shri Tek Chand, r/o Village

Behi, P.O. Koti, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. w.e.f. 10-02-2014 by (i) the Employer/

Managing Director, M/s VK Emergency Management and Research Institute, Dharampur,

District Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer) (ii) the Managing Director, M/s Adecco Flexione

Workforce Solutions Private Limited, C-127, Basement Level, Satguru Infotech, Phase-

VIII, Industrial Area Mohali, Punjab (Contractor Company), without complying with the

provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of

back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled

to from the above employer?”

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

4923

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 14 vxLr] 2017@23 Jko.k] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 18th April, 2016

No. 11-2/86(Lab)ID/2015/Bilaspur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute exists between Shri Bachnu Ram s/o Late Shri Asha Ram through Shri Sunder Singh Sippy,

General Secretary and Authorized Representative Forest and Forest Workers Union, r/o House No.

100/3, Roura Sector-2, District Bilaspur, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Bilaspur Forest

Division, District Bilaspur, H.P. on the issue of alleged non-regularization of his services during

year, 1999.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per

power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted

under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether non-regularization of the services of Shri Bachnu Ram s/o Late Shri Asha Ram

through Shri Sunder Singh Sippy, General Secretary and Authorized Representative Forest

and Forest Workers Union, r/o House No. 100/3, Roura Sector-2, District Bilaspur, H.P.

during year, 1999 and non-implementation of award of Ld. Labour Court-cum-Industrial

Tribunal dated 28-04-2010 by the Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Bilaspur,

District Bilaspur, H.P., is legal and justified? If not, to what relief, service benefits, the

above workman is entitled to from the above employer?”

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 30th April, 2016

No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute

exists between Shri Bakshi Ram s/o Shri Mellu Ram, c/o Shri R.K. Singh Parmar, General

Secretary, Pb. INTUC, L-211, Brari, P.O. Partap Nagar, Tehsil Nangal, District Roper, Punjab and

Managing Director, M/s Arvind Talwar Machine Tools (P) Limited, V.P.O. Nangal Khurad, Tehsil

Haroli, District Una, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services w.e.f. 01-07-2014 (as

alleged by workman).

4924

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 14 vxLr] 2017@23 Jko.k] 1939

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that t his

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per

power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted

under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether termination of the services of Shri Bakshi Ram s/o Shri Mellu Ram, c/o Shri R.K.

Singh Parmar, General Secretary, Pb. INTUC, L-211, Brari, P.O. Partap Nagar, Tehsil

Nangal, District Ropar, Punjab w.e.f. 01-07-2014 (as alleged by workman) by the Managing

Director, M/s Arvind Talwar Machine Tools (P) Limited, V.P.O. Nangal Khurad, Tehsil

Haroli, District Una, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service

benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?”

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 5th April, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2016/Chamba.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation

Officer, Chamba has submitted a report as provided under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Smt. Bego Devi w/o Shri

Prem Chand, r/o Village Udaini Luj, P.O. Luj, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. and the

Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar (Pangi), District Chamba, H.P. as per

demand notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Chamba on 29-05-2012 submitted by the

said ex-worker regarding her termination of services.

Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that

during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and

amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts

for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said

dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial

dispute.

Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub-section 5 of

Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above ex-

worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during September,

2004 before the above employer after delay of more than 7 years and has worked only for 139.5,

165, 194.5, 168, 130, 150, 125, 139, 118 and 107 days during the years 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998,

1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 respectively.

4925

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 14 vxLr] 2017@23 Jko.k] 1939

Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising

the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-

Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble High

Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for

adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal

Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue:—

“Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Bego Devi w/o Shri Prem Chand, r/o

Village Udaini Luj, P.O. Luj, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004

by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar (Pangi), District Chamba,

H.P., who has worked as beldar on daily wages basis only for 139.5, 165, 194.5, 168, 130,

150, 125, 139, 118 and 107 days during the years 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000,

2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 respectively and has raised her industrial dispute demand notice

dated nil received in the Labour Office Chamba on 29-05-2012 after delay of more than 7

years, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of working period stated above and delay of

more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority,

past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above

employer/management? ”

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 30th April, 2016

No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute

exists between Shri Bhajan Singh s/o Shri Mangal Singh, c/o Shri R.K. Singh Parmar, General

Secretary, Pb. INTUC, L-211, Brari, P.O. Partap Nagar, Tehsil Nangal, District Ropar, Punjab and

Managing Director, M/s Arvind Talwar Machine Tools (P) Limited, V.P.O. Nangal Khurad, Tehsil

Haroli, District Una, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services w.e.f. 01-07-2014 (as

alleged by workman).

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per

power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted

under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—

4926

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 14 vxLr] 2017@23 Jko.k] 1939

“Whether termination of the services of Shri Bhajan Singh s/o Shri Mangal Singh, c/o Shri

R.K. Singh Parmar, General Secretary, Pb. INTUC, L-211, Brari, P.O. Partap Nagar, Tehsil

Nangal, District Ropar, Punjab w.e.f. 01-07-2014 (as alleged by workman) by the Managing

Director, M/s Arvind Talwar Machine Tools (P) Limited, V.P.O. Nangal Khurad, Tehsil

Haroli, District Una, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service

benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?”

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 29th April, 2016

No. 11-1/18(Lab)ID/2016/Sunder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute exists between Shri Ghanshyam s/o Shri Tek Chand, r/o Village Bhakha, P.O. Nihari,

Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division,

Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of alleged time to time termination of his services

during May, 2010 to June, 2014.