jkti=] fgekpy izns'k
fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr
ohjokj] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939
fgekpy izns'k ljdkj
lwpuk ,oa tu lEidZ foHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f'keyk&171002] 11 vxLr] 2017
la[;k% ic&ch¼2½&1@98&II-&&fgekpy izns”k ds jkT;iky] fu%”kDr O;fDr vf/kdkj vf/kfu;e]
2016 ¼2016 dk 49½ dh /kkjk 34 ds ijUrqd ds v/khu iznRr “kfDr;kas dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] vk;qDr
102&jkti=@2017&17&08&2017
¼4945½
4946
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939
¼fu%”kDrrk½] ds ijke”kZ ls] lwpuk ,oa tu lEidZ foHkkx esa fpfUgr ¼csUp ekdZ½ fu%”kDrrkvkas okys O;fDr;ksa
ds fy, pkj izfr”kr vkj{k.k ls fuEufyf[kr inksa dks NwV iznku djrs gSa( vFkkZr~%&
1- ftyk yksd lEidZ vf/kdkjh@lwpuk vf/kdkjh
2- lgk;d yksd lEidZ vf/kdkjh
3- izpkj lgk;d] xzsM&I
4- izpkj lgk;d] xzsM&II
5- pkyd
vkns'k }kjk]
gLrk{kfjr@&
eq[; lfpo ¼lwpuk ,oa tu lEidZ½A
&&&&&
[Authoritative English text of this Department Notification No. Pub-B(2)-1/98-II, dated
11-08-2017 as required under clause (3) of Article 348 of the Constitution of India].
INFORMATION & PUBLIC RELATIONS DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 11th August, 2017
No. Pub-B(2)-1/98-II.—In exercise of powers conferred under proviso to Section 34 of the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (49 of 2016), the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, in
consultation with the Commissioner (Disabilities), is pleased to exempt the following posts from
4% reservation to persons with benchmark disabilities in the Information & Public Relations
Department, namely:—
1.
District Public Relations Officer/Information Officer
2.
Assistant Public Relations Officer
3.
Publicity Assistant Grade-I
4.
Publicity Assistant Grade-II
5.
Driver
By order,
V.C. PHARKA,
Chief Secretary (I&PR).
_________
lwpuk ,oa tu lEidZ foHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f'keyk&171002] 11 vxLr] 2017
la[;k% ic&ch¼2½&1@98&II-&&fgekpy izns”k ds jkT;iky] fu%”kDr O;fDr vf/kdkj vf/kfu;e]
2016 ¼2016 dk 49½ dh /kkjk 33 ds v/khu iznRr “kfDr;kas dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] lwpuk ,oa tu lEidZ
4947
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939
foHkkx esa] fuEufyf[kr inksa dks] fpfUgr ¼csUp ekdZ½ fu%”kDrrkvksa okys O;fDr;ksa ds fy, pkj izfr”kr
vkj{k.k ds fy, fuEu :i ls fpfUgr djrs gSa( vFkkZr%~ &
Øe la[;k
in dk uke
fpfUgr ¼csUp ekdZ½ fu%'kDrrkvksa okys O;fDr;ksa ds izoxZ ftuds fy,
in vkjf{kr gSa
1-
fyfid
d- vU/krk vkSj {kh.k n`f’V(
[k- cgjk vkSj Åapk lquus okyk(
x- efLr’dh; ydok] dq’B jksx eqDr] ckSukiu] rstkc geys ds ihfM+r
vkSj ekalis”kh; dqiks’k.k fodkj lfgr pyu fu%”kDrrk(
?k- cgjs&vU/kksa lfgr [k.M ¼d½ ls ¼x½ ds v/khu O;fDr;ksa esa ls
izR;sd fu%”kDrrk ds fy, fpfUgr inksa ds fy, cgq fu%”kDrrk,aA
2-
lsoknkj
d- vU/krk vkSj {kh.k n`f’V(
[k- cgjk vkSj Åapk lquus okyk(
x- efLr’dh; ydok] dq’B jksx eqDr] ckSukiu] rstkc geys ds ihfM+r
vkSj ekalis”kh; dqiks’k.k fodkj lfgr pyu fu%”kDrrk(
?k- cgjs&vU/kksa lfgr [k.M ¼d½ ls ¼x½ ds v/khu O;fDr;ksa esa ls izR;sd
fu”k%Drrk ds fy, fpfUgr inksa ds fy, cgq fu%”kDrrk,aA
vkns'k }kjk]
gLrk{kfjr@&
eq[; lfpo ¼lwpuk ,oa tu lEidZ½A
&&&&&&&
[Authoritative English text of this Department Notification No. Pub-B(2)-1/98-II, dated
11-08-2017 as required under clause (3) of Article 348 of the Constitution of India].
INFORMATION & PUBLIC RELATIONS DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 11th August, 2017
No. Pub-B(2)-1/98-II.—In exercise of powers conferred under Section 33 of the Rights of
Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (49 of 2016), the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, is pleased to
identify the following posts for 4% reservation to persons with benchmark disabilities in the
Information & Public Relations Department, namely;—
Sl. No.
Name of Post
Categories of persons with benchmark disabilities for which post
is reserved
1.
Clerk
a. Blindness and low vision;
b. Deaf and hard of hearing;
c. Locomotor disability including cerebral palsy, leprosy cured,
dwarfism, acid attack victims and muscular dystrophy;
d. Multiple disabilities from amongst persons under clauses (a) to (c)
including deaf-blindness in the posts identified for each disability.
4948
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939
2.
Peon
a. Blindness and low vision;
b. Deaf and hard of hearing;
c. Locomotor disability including cerebral palsy, leprosy cured,
dwarfism, acid attack victims and muscular dystrophy;
d. Multiple disabilities from amongst persons under clauses (a) to (c)
including deaf-blindness in the posts identified for each disability.
By order,
V.C. PHARKA,
Chief Secretary (I&PR).
_________
LOCAL AUDIT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 14th August, 2017
No. 1-315/76-Fin (LA)Vol-10-5000.—On the recommendation of the Departmental
Promotion Committee, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to promote Smt. Mamta Rawal,
Junior Auditor (Class-III-Non-Gazetted) presently working in the pay band of Rs. 10300-
34800+3800 Grade Pay to the post of Section Officer (Class-II-Gazetted) in the pay band of
Rs.10300-34800 + 5000 Grade Pay on regular basis with immediate effect.
Consequent upon the above promotion Smt. Mamta Rawal will remain posted at Resident
Audit Scheme, APMC, Solan against vacant post.
Smt. Mamta Rawal may submit her option for fixation of pay under Rule FR- 22(1)(a)(i)
within one month from the date of issue of this notification and will remain on probation for a
period of two years.
By order,
Sd/-
Additional Chief Secretary (Finance).
________
lkekU; iz'kklu foHkkx
¼[k&vuqHkkx½
vf/klwpuk
f'keyk&2] 11 vxLr] 2017
Lak[;k% th,Mh&ch&¼,½ 1&2@2013&III ¼f”keyk½-&&fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky dh ;g jk; gS fd
yksdfgr esa ,slk djuk vko';d vkSj lehphu gS fd orZeku mi&rglhy uu[kM+h] ftyk f”keyk] fgekpy
izns'k dk ntkZ c<+kdj rglhy dk dj fn;k tk,] ftldk eq[;ky; uu[kM+h] ftyk f”keyk] fgekpy
izns'k esa gksxk] rkfd utnhd ds xkaoksa ds lEc) yksxksa dks csgrj lsok,a miyC/k djokbZ tk ldsa vkSj
jktLo ls lEcfU/kr dk;Z esa mudks gksus okyh vlqfo/kk ls fuokfjr fd;k tk lds rFkk csgrj iz'kklfud
fu;U=.k gks ldsA
4949
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939
vr% fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky] fgekpy izns'k Hkw&jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1954 ¼1954 dk vf/kfu;e
la[;kad 6½ dh /kkjk 6 vkSj jftLVªhdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1908 ¼1908 dk vf/kfu;e la[;kad 16½ dh /kkjk 5
}kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mi&rglhy] uu[kM+h] ftyk f”keyk] fgekpy izns'k dk ntkZ
c<+kdj rqjUr izHkko ls bl vf/klwpuk ds ikaposa LrEHk esa nf'kZr 15 iVokj o`Ÿkksa ls xfBr rglhy dk djrs
gSa%&
rglhy
mi&e.My
ftyk
eq[;ky;
iVokj o`Ùk
1
2
3
4
5
uu[kM+h
jkeiqj
f”keyk
uu[kM+h
1- “kksyh
2- Fkkuk&uu[kM+h
3- iwuu
4- tkgw
5- [kwUuh iuksyh
6- [kM+kgu
7- cxyrh
8- trjky
9- nsyB
10- ySyu
11- cM+kp
12- dyeksx&nkj.k
13- e>kSyh
14- [kekMh
15- FkSyh&p[kVh
mi&rglhy uu[kM+h dk ntkZ c<+kdj rglhy dk djus ds QyLo:Ik jkeiqj rglhy dh lajpuk
fuEu izdkj ls gksxh %&
rglhy
mi&e.My
ftyk
Rkglhy esa lfEefyr iVokj o`Ùkksa ds uke
1
2
3
4
jkeiqj
jkeiqj
f”keyk
1- p.Mh&czkaMk
2- D;kvks
3- yokuk&lnkuk
4- xkuoh
5- ljikjk
6- nksQnk
7- e>soyh
8- xksikyiqj
9- /kkj xkSjk
10- >kdM+h
11- jpksyh
12- jkeiqj ¼'kgj½
13- f”kxyk
14- Mulk
4950
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939
15- ykylk
16- /kkj
17- dqelw
18- nŸkuxj
19- fujFk
20- nokMk
21- e>soVh
vkns'k }kjk]
oh0 lh0 Qkjdk]
Ekq[; lfpoA
&&&&&&&
[Authoritative English text of this Department Notification No. GAD-B-(A)-1-2/2013-III (Shimla)
dated 11-8-2017 as required under clause(3) of Article 348 of the Constitution of India].
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
(B-Section)
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 11th August, 2017
No. GAD-B-(A)-1-2/2013-III (Shimla).—WHEREAS, the Governor of Himachal Pradesh
is of the opinion that it is necessary and expedient in public interest to do so that the present Sub-
Tehsil Nankhari, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh may be upgraded to that of Tehsil with its
Headquarter at Nankhari, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, so as to provide better services to the
concerned people of nearby villages and to avoid inconvenience faced by them pertaining to
revenue work and to have better administrative control.
NOW, THEREFORE, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 6 of the Himachal
Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1954 (Act No. 6 of 1954) and section 5 of the Registration Act, 1908
(Act No. 16 of 1908), the Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to upgrade the Sub-Tehsil
Nankhari, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh to that of Tehsil consisting of 15 Patwar Circles
shown in the 5th column of this notification, with immediate effect :—
Tehsil
Sub-Division
District
Headquarter
Patwar Circles
1
2
3
4
5
Nankhari
Rampur
Shimla
Nankhari
1. Sholi
2. Thana-Nankhari
3. Punan
4. Jahoo
5. Khuni Panoli
6. Kharahan
7. Bagalti
8. Jatral
9. Delath
4951
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939
10. Lelan
11. Barach
12. Kalmog-Daran
13. Majholi
14. Khamadi
15. Thaili Chakhati
On the up-gradation of Sub-Tehsil Nankhari to that of Tehsil, the composition of Tehsil
Rampur will be as under:—
Tehsil
Sub-Division
District
Name of Patwar Circles included in the Tehsil
1
2
3
4
Rampur
Rampur
Shimla
1. Chandi Branda
2. Kyao
3. Labana Sadana
4. Ganvi
5. Sarpara
6. Dofda
7. Majhewali
8. Gopalpur
9. Dhar Goura
10 Jhakri
11. Racholi
12. Rampur (Town)
13. Shingla
14. Dansa
15. Lalsa
16. Dhar
17. Kumsu
18. Duttnagar
19. Nirath
20. Dawara
21. Majhewati
By order,
V. C. PHARKA,
Chief Secretary.
________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171 001, the 18th April, 2016
No.11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
exists between Shri Umesh Kumar s/o Shri Devinder Kumar, r/o V.P.O. Galma, Tehsil Balh,
4952
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939
District Mandi, H.P. and (i) the Managing Director, the H.P. State Co-operative Milk Producers’
Federation Limited, Totu, District Shimla, H.P., (ii) the Manager (Production), H.P. State Co-
operative Milk Producers’ Federation Limited, Mandi Unit at Chakkar, P.O. Gutkar, District
Mandi, H.P. (Principal Employer), (iii) Shri Bhupesh Janartha, M/s Shimla Cleanways & Security
Services, Aditya Lodge, Sanjauli, Shimla (Contractor) on the issue of alleged termination from
services w.e.f. 01-09-2013.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Umesh Kumar s/o Shri Devinder Kumar r/o
V.P.O. Galma, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 01-09-2013 by (i) the Managing
Director, the H.P. State Co-operative Milk Producers’ Federation Limited, Totu, District
Shimla, H.P., (ii) the Manager (Production), H.P. State Co-operative Milk Producers’
Federation Limited, Mandi Unit at Chakkar, P.O. Gutkar, District Mandi, H.P. (Principal
Employer), (iii) Shri Bhupesh Janartha, M/s Shimla Cleanways & Security Services, Aditya
Lodge, Sanjauli, Shimla (Contractor), without complying with the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the
above employers?”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 28th April, 2016
No.11-2/86(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
exists between Shri Vikas s/o Late Shri Ved Prakash, r/o V.P.O. Samirpur, Tehsil & District
Kangra, H.P. and the Incharge, Regional Mountaineering Centre Mcleodganj, Tehsil Dharamshala,
District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services during November, 2013.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
4953
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Vikas s/o Late Shri Ved Prakash, r/o V.P.O.
Samirpur, Tehsil & District Kangra, H.P. during November, 2013 by the Incharge, Regional
Mountaineering Centre Mcleodganj, Tehsil Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P., without
complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If
not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 5th February, 2016
No. 11-1/7(Lab) ID/2016/Nurpur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
exists between Shri Ajay Sharma s/o Shri Chuhru Ram Sharma, r/o Village Jangal, P.O. Bagga,
Tehsil Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., (i) the Sub-Divisional Soil Conservation Officer, Fatehpur,
District Kangra, H.P. (Principal Employer), (ii) the President, Farm Technocrats’ Forum Palampur,
District Kangra, H.P. (placement agency) on the issue of alleged termination of his services during
November, 2014.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of the Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Ajay Sharma, s/o Shri Chuhru Ram Sharma,
r/o Village Jangal, P.O. Bagga, Tehsil Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. during November, 2014
by (i) the Sub-Divisional Soil Conservation Officer, Fatehpur, District Kangra, H.P.
(Principal Employer), (ii) the President, Farm Technocrats’ Forum Palampur, District
Kangra, H.P. (placement agency), without complying with the provisions of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above
employers?”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
4954
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 12th February, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2009/Chamba.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Chamba has submitted a report as provided under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri Amar Singh s/o Shri
Parveen, r/o Village Bithal, P.O. Khargat, Tehsil Bhattiyat, District Chamba, H.P. and the
Executive Engineer, Irrigation-cum-PH Divison, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. as per demand
notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Chamba during year, 2007 submitted by the said ex-
worker regarding his termination of services.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided uder sub-section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above ex-
worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services w.e.f. 30-10-2000
before the above employer after delay of about 7 years and has worked only for 270 days, 296 days,
328 days and 165 days during the years 1997, 1998, 1999 and 2000 respectively.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-
IVLoose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for
adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal
Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue:—
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Amar Singh s/o Shri Parveen, r/o Village
Bithal, P.O. Khargat, Tehsil Bhattiyat, District Chamba, H.P. w.e.f. 30-11-2000 by the
Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. who has worked as
beldar on daily wages basis only for 270 days, 296 days, 328 days and 165 days during the
years 1997, 1998, 1999 and 2000 respectively and has raised his industrial dispute demand
notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Chamba during year, 2007 after delay of
about 7 years, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of working period of 270 days, 296
days, 328 days and 165 days during the years 1997, 1998, 1999 and 2000 respectively and
delay of about 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the
above employer/management.
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
4955
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171 001, the 20th February, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2015/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute exists between Shri Arif Khan s/o Shri Bashir Mohammad, r/o Village Dhanju, P.O.
Khushnagri, Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, H.P. and (i) the Employer/Managing Director, M/s
GVK Emergency Management and Research Institute, Dharampur, District Solan, H.P. (Principal
Employer), (ii) the Managing Director, M/s Adecco Flexione Workforce Solutions Private Limited,
C-127, Basement Level, Satguru Infotech, Phase-VIII, Industrial Area Mohali, Punjab (Contractor
Company), on the issue of alleged termination of his service w.e.f. 27- 08-2013.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Arif Khan s/o Shri Bashir Mohammad, r/o
Village Dhanju, P.O. Khushnagri, Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, H.P. w.e.f. 27-08-2013
by (i) the Employer/Managing Director, M/s GVK Emergency Management and Research
Institute, Dharampur, District Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer), (ii) the Managing Director,
M/s Adecco Flexione Workforce Solutions Private Limited, C-127, Basement Level,
Satguru Infotech, Phase-VIII, Industrial Area Mohali, Punjab (Contractor Company),
without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and
justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 12th February, 2016
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015/Mandi.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Mandi Zone, Mandi has submitted a report as provided under Section 12(4) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri
Beli Ram s/o Shri Fagnu, r/o Village Bambola, P.O. Tihri, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi, H.P. and
the Executive Engineer, I.& P.H., Division Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. as per demand notice dated
nil received in the Labour Office Mandi on dated 17-09-2014 submitted by the said ex-worker
regarding his termination of services.
4956
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided uder sub-section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above ex-
worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during August, 2000
before the above employer after delay of more than 13 years and has worked only for 14 days, 48
days and 27 days in 1998, 1999 and 2000 respectively.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4- 9/2006-
IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble
High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for
adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal
Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue:—
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Beli Ram s/o Shri Fagnu, r/o Village
Bambola, P.O. Tihri, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi, H.P. during August, 2000 by the
Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Padhar, District Mandi, H.P., who has worked as
beldar on daily wages basis only for 14 days, 48 days and 27 days in 1998, 1999 and 2000
respectively and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 13 years, allegedly without
complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If
not, keeping in view of working period of 14 days, 48 days and 27 days in 1998, 1999 and
2000 respectively and delay of more than 13 years in raising the industrial dispute vide
demand notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Mandi on 17-09-2014, what amount
of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employer/management? ”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
CORRIGENDUM
Shimla-171001, the 19th February, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2013/Chamba.—In partial modification of this Department’s
Notification of even number dated 27-02-2015, the date of termination of services of workman Shri
Bhagat Ram s/o Shri Saran Dass, r/o V.P.O. Rei, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. may be read
as “September, 2004” instead of “September, 2003”, which was inadvertently recorded in the said
notification.
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
4957
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 16th February, 2016
No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2016/Chamba.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Chamba has submitted a report as provided under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Smt. Champa w/o Shri
Sham Lal, r/o Village Chaloli, P.O. Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. and the
Executive Engineer, Killar Division, HPPWD, Killar (Pangi), District Chamba, H.P. as per demand
notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Chamba on 29-05-2012 submitted by the said ex-
worker regarding her termination of services.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub-section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above
exworker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during September,
2004 before the above employer after delay of more than 7 years and has worked only for 76, 31,
51, 136, 152, 35, 105, 57, 92, 138, 120, 100, 116 and 88 days during the years 1990, 1991, 1992,
1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 respectively.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV
Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for
adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal
Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue:—
“Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Champa w/o Shri Sham Lal r/o Village
Chaloli, P.O. Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004 by the
Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar (Pangi), District Chamba, H.P.,
who has worked as beldar on daily wages basis only for 76, 31, 51, 136, 152, 35, 105, 57,
92, 138, 120, 100, 116 and 88 days during the years 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995,
1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 respectively and has raised her
industrial dispute demand notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Chamba on 29-05-
2012 after delay of more than 7 years, allegedly without complying with the provisions of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of working
period stated above and delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what
amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-
worker is entitled to from the above employer/management? ”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
4958
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 17th February, 2016
No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2016/Mandi.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Mandi Zone, Mandi has submitted a report as provided under Section 12(4) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri
Chander Shekhar s/o Shri Baldev Singh, r/o Village Narwalka, P.O. Kamlah Fort, Tehsil Sarkaghat,
District Mandi, H.P. and the Divisional Manager, H.P. State Forest Development Corporation
Limited, Forest Working Division Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. as per demand notice dated
26-05-2014 submitted by the said exworker regarding his termination of services.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub-section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above ex-
worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services w.e.f. 22-01-1995
before the above employer after delay of more than 18 years and has worked only from 01-05-1994
to 21-01-1995.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble High
Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for
adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal
Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue:—
“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Chander Shekhar s/o Shri Baldev Singh,
r/o Village Narwalka, P.O. Kamlah Fort, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 22-
01-1995 by the Divisional Manager, H.P. State Forest Development Corporation Limited,
Forest Working Division Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P., who has worked as beldar on
daily wages basis only from 01-05-1994 to 21-01-1995 and has raised his industrial dispute
vide demand notice dated 26-05-2014 after more than 18 years, allegedly without
complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If
not, keeping in view of working period from 01-05-1994 to 21-01-1995 and delay of more
than 18 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
employer/management? ”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
4959
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 17th February, 2016
No. 11-3/93(Lab) ID/2016/Kullu.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
exists between Shri Daulat Ram s/o Late Shri Het Ram, r/o Village Tanaru, P.O. Nagwain, Sub-
Tehsil Aut, District Mandi, H.P. and (i) the Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture
and Forestry, Nauni, District Solan, H.P., (ii) the Assosiate Director (R&E), Dr. Y.S. Parmar
University of Horticulture and Forestry, Regional Horticulture Research Station Bajaura, District
Kullu, H.P. on the issue of alleged time to time termination of his services during year, 1996 to 17-
06-2013 and finally w.e.f. 18-06-2013.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub-section 5 of the Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted
under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether time to time termination of the services of Shri Daulat Ram s/o Late Shri Het
Ram, r/o Village Tanaru, P.O. Nagwain, Sub-Tehsil Aut, District Mandi, H.P. during year,
1996 to 17-06-2013 and finally w.e.f. 18-06-2013 (as alleged by workman) by (i) the
Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, District Solan,
H.P., (ii) the Assosiate Director (R&E), Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and
Forestry, Regional Horticulture Research Station Bajaura, District Kullu, H.P., without
complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If
not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above worker is entitled to from the above employers?”
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner,
Himachal Pradesh.
________
OFFICE OF THE RETURNING OFFICER
CENTRAL COUNCIL FOR INDIAN MEDICINE ELECTION
REGIONAL AYURVEDIC HOSPITAL, SHIMLA-171002
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 02nd August, 2017
No. CCIM/Election/HP-I/2016-100.—As per election programme notified on 12-6-2017
after withdrawal of the nomination papers, the following candidates are in the fray for contesting
the Central Council for Indian Medicine Election from the State of Himachal Pradesh:—
4960
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939
Sr. No.
Name and address of the candidate duly nominated to represent Ayurveda
System of Medicine
1.
Dr. Ashok Kumar Sharma s/o Shri Jai Karan Dass, r/o VPO Bela, Tehsil Nadaun,
Distt. Hamirpur, H.P.
2.
Dr. Dinesh Kumar, s/o Shri. Dila Ram r/o Jalpa Niwas, Mohalla Mai Ka Bagh,
Tehsil and Distt. Chamba, H.P.
3.
Dr. Suneet Kumar Pathania s/o Shri Karam Singh Pathania, V&PO Rait, Tehsil
Shahpur, Distt. Kangra, H.P.
4.
Dr. Virender Kaul s/o Shri Jitender Kaul, r/o Gauri Niwas, Ustehar, Baijnath,
Distt. Kangra, H.P.
By order,
(Dr. R. K. PRUTHI, I.A.S.),
Returning Officer,
Central Council for Indian Medicine Election,
H.P.Shimla-171002.
&&&&&&&&
In the Court of Shri Rohit Rathour, H.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate,
Kullu, District Kullu, H.P.
In the matter of :
1.
Ravi Raj s/o Shri Sher Singh, resident of Village Chharaihara, Post Office Mohal,
Tehsil Bhunter, District Kullu, H.P.
2.
Geetanjali Shashni d/o Shri Mohan Lal Shashni, resident of Village Chharaihara, Post
Office Mohal, Ward No. 6, Tehsil Bhunter, District Kullu, H.P.
. . Applicants.
Versus
General Public
Subject.—Proclamation for the registration of Marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act,
1954.
Ravi Raj and Geetanjali Shashni have filed an application on dated 29-07-2017 alongwith
affidavits in the court of undersigned under section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have
solemnized their marriage on 26-08-2015 and they are living as husband and wife since then, hence
their marriage may be registered under Act, ibid.
Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who
has any objection regarding this marriage can file the objection personally or writing before this
court on or before 29-08-2017. The objection received after 29-08-2017 will not be entertained and
marriage will be registered accordingly.
4961
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939
Issued today on 29-07-2017 under my hand and seal of the court.
Seal.
ROHIT RATHOUR (HAS),
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate,
Kullu, District Kullu, H.P.
____________
c vnkyr rglhynkj ,oa dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh] Åuk+] rglhy o
ftyk Åuk ¼fg0 iz0½
Jh fjadh nsoh
cuke
vke turk
nj[okLr tsj /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q jftLVªhdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969-
uksfVl cuke turk vkeA
Jherh fjadh nsoh iRuh Jh 'k'kh iky] fuoklh okMZ ua0 9 cgMkyk] rglhy Åuk+] ftyk Åuk us
bl vnkyr esa nj[okLr nh gS fd mldh iq=h Hkkouk dk tUe xkao ugMky] rglhy o ftyk Åuk esa
fnukad 08&08&2014 dks gqvk Fkk] ijUrq bl ckjs iapk;r ds fjdkWMZ esa iathdj.k ugha djok;k tk ldkA
vc iathdj.k djus ds vkns'k fn, tk,aA
vr% bl uksfVl ds ek/;e ls loZlk/kkj.k dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh O;fDr dks
mijksDr tUe ds iathdj.k gksus ckjs dksbZ mtj@,rjkt gks rks og fnukad 31&08&2017 dks izkr% nl
cts v/kksgLrk{kjh ds le{k vlkyru@odkyru gkftj vkdj is'k dj ldrk gS vU;Fkk mijksDr tUe dk
iathdj.k djus ds vkns'k ns fn, tk,axsA
vkt fnukad 31&07&2017 dks gLrk{kj esjs o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
rglhynkj ,oa dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]
Åuk] ftyk Åuk ¼fg0 iz0½A
4962
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939
fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr
bysDVªkWfud gLrk{kfjr jkti=] oSclkbV http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in ij miyC/k gS ,oe~ vkWuykbu lR;kfir fd;k tk ldrk gS