jkti=] fgekpy izns'k

fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr

ohjokj] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939

fgekpy izns'k ljdkj

lwpuk ,oa tu lEidZ foHkkx

vf/klwpuk

f'keyk&171002] 11 vxLr] 2017

la[;k% ic&ch¼2½&1@98&II-&&fgekpy izns”k ds jkT;iky] fu%”kDr O;fDr vf/kdkj vf/kfu;e]

2016 ¼2016 dk 49½ dh /kkjk 34 ds ijUrqd ds v/khu iznRr “kfDr;kas dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] vk;qDr

102&jkti=@2017&17&08&2017

¼4945½

4946

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939

¼fu%”kDrrk½] ds ijke”kZ ls] lwpuk ,oa tu lEidZ foHkkx esa fpfUgr ¼csUp ekdZ½ fu%”kDrrkvkas okys O;fDr;ksa

ds fy, pkj izfr”kr vkj{k.k ls fuEufyf[kr inksa dks NwV iznku djrs gSa( vFkkZr~%&

1- ftyk yksd lEidZ vf/kdkjh@lwpuk vf/kdkjh

2- lgk;d yksd lEidZ vf/kdkjh

3- izpkj lgk;d] xzsM&I

4- izpkj lgk;d] xzsM&II

5- pkyd

vkns'k }kjk]

gLrk{kfjr@&

eq[; lfpo ¼lwpuk ,oa tu lEidZ½A

&&&&&

[Authoritative English text of this Department Notification No. Pub-B(2)-1/98-II, dated

11-08-2017 as required under clause (3) of Article 348 of the Constitution of India].

INFORMATION & PUBLIC RELATIONS DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 11th August, 2017

No. Pub-B(2)-1/98-II.—In exercise of powers conferred under proviso to Section 34 of the

Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (49 of 2016), the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, in

consultation with the Commissioner (Disabilities), is pleased to exempt the following posts from

4% reservation to persons with benchmark disabilities in the Information & Public Relations

Department, namely:—

1.

District Public Relations Officer/Information Officer

2.

Assistant Public Relations Officer

3.

Publicity Assistant Grade-I

4.

Publicity Assistant Grade-II

5.

Driver

By order,

V.C. PHARKA,

Chief Secretary (I&PR).

_________

lwpuk ,oa tu lEidZ foHkkx

vf/klwpuk

f'keyk&171002] 11 vxLr] 2017

la[;k% ic&ch¼2½&1@98&II-&&fgekpy izns”k ds jkT;iky] fu%”kDr O;fDr vf/kdkj vf/kfu;e]

2016 ¼2016 dk 49½ dh /kkjk 33 ds v/khu iznRr “kfDr;kas dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] lwpuk ,oa tu lEidZ

4947

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939

foHkkx esa] fuEufyf[kr inksa dks] fpfUgr ¼csUp ekdZ½ fu%”kDrrkvksa okys O;fDr;ksa ds fy, pkj izfr”kr

vkj{k.k ds fy, fuEu :i ls fpfUgr djrs gSa( vFkkZr%~ &

Øe la[;k

in dk uke

fpfUgr ¼csUp ekdZ½ fu%'kDrrkvksa okys O;fDr;ksa ds izoxZ ftuds fy,

in vkjf{kr gSa

1-

fyfid

d- vU/krk vkSj {kh.k n`f’V(

[k- cgjk vkSj Åapk lquus okyk(

x- efLr’dh; ydok] dq’B jksx eqDr] ckSukiu] rstkc geys ds ihfM+r

vkSj ekalis”kh; dqiks’k.k fodkj lfgr pyu fu%”kDrrk(

?k- cgjs&vU/kksa lfgr [k.M ¼d½ ls ¼x½ ds v/khu O;fDr;ksa esa ls

izR;sd fu%”kDrrk ds fy, fpfUgr inksa ds fy, cgq fu%”kDrrk,aA

2-

lsoknkj

d- vU/krk vkSj {kh.k n`f’V(

[k- cgjk vkSj Åapk lquus okyk(

x- efLr’dh; ydok] dq’B jksx eqDr] ckSukiu] rstkc geys ds ihfM+r

vkSj ekalis”kh; dqiks’k.k fodkj lfgr pyu fu%”kDrrk(

?k- cgjs&vU/kksa lfgr [k.M ¼d½ ls ¼x½ ds v/khu O;fDr;ksa esa ls izR;sd

fu”k%Drrk ds fy, fpfUgr inksa ds fy, cgq fu%”kDrrk,aA

vkns'k }kjk]

gLrk{kfjr@&

eq[; lfpo ¼lwpuk ,oa tu lEidZ½A

&&&&&&&

[Authoritative English text of this Department Notification No. Pub-B(2)-1/98-II, dated

11-08-2017 as required under clause (3) of Article 348 of the Constitution of India].

INFORMATION & PUBLIC RELATIONS DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 11th August, 2017

No. Pub-B(2)-1/98-II.—In exercise of powers conferred under Section 33 of the Rights of

Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (49 of 2016), the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, is pleased to

identify the following posts for 4% reservation to persons with benchmark disabilities in the

Information & Public Relations Department, namely;—

Sl. No.

Name of Post

Categories of persons with benchmark disabilities for which post

is reserved

1.

Clerk

a. Blindness and low vision;

b. Deaf and hard of hearing;

c. Locomotor disability including cerebral palsy, leprosy cured,

dwarfism, acid attack victims and muscular dystrophy;

d. Multiple disabilities from amongst persons under clauses (a) to (c)

including deaf-blindness in the posts identified for each disability.

4948

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939

2.

Peon

a. Blindness and low vision;

b. Deaf and hard of hearing;

c. Locomotor disability including cerebral palsy, leprosy cured,

dwarfism, acid attack victims and muscular dystrophy;

d. Multiple disabilities from amongst persons under clauses (a) to (c)

including deaf-blindness in the posts identified for each disability.

By order,

V.C. PHARKA,

Chief Secretary (I&PR).

_________

LOCAL AUDIT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 14th August, 2017

No. 1-315/76-Fin (LA)Vol-10-5000.—On the recommendation of the Departmental

Promotion Committee, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to promote Smt. Mamta Rawal,

Junior Auditor (Class-III-Non-Gazetted) presently working in the pay band of Rs. 10300-

34800+3800 Grade Pay to the post of Section Officer (Class-II-Gazetted) in the pay band of

Rs.10300-34800 + 5000 Grade Pay on regular basis with immediate effect.

Consequent upon the above promotion Smt. Mamta Rawal will remain posted at Resident

Audit Scheme, APMC, Solan against vacant post.

Smt. Mamta Rawal may submit her option for fixation of pay under Rule FR- 22(1)(a)(i)

within one month from the date of issue of this notification and will remain on probation for a

period of two years.

By order,

Sd/-

Additional Chief Secretary (Finance).

________

lkekU; iz'kklu foHkkx

¼[k&vuqHkkx½

vf/klwpuk

f'keyk&2] 11 vxLr] 2017

Lak[;k% th,Mh&ch&¼,½ 1&2@2013&III ¼f”keyk½-&&fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky dh ;g jk; gS fd

yksdfgr esa ,slk djuk vko';d vkSj lehphu gS fd orZeku mi&rglhy uu[kM+h] ftyk f”keyk] fgekpy

izns'k dk ntkZ c<+kdj rglhy dk dj fn;k tk,] ftldk eq[;ky; uu[kM+h] ftyk f”keyk] fgekpy

izns'k esa gksxk] rkfd utnhd ds xkaoksa ds lEc) yksxksa dks csgrj lsok,a miyC/k djokbZ tk ldsa vkSj

jktLo ls lEcfU/kr dk;Z esa mudks gksus okyh vlqfo/kk ls fuokfjr fd;k tk lds rFkk csgrj iz'kklfud

fu;U=.k gks ldsA

4949

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939

vr% fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky] fgekpy izns'k Hkw&jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1954 ¼1954 dk vf/kfu;e

la[;kad 6½ dh /kkjk 6 vkSj jftLVªhdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1908 ¼1908 dk vf/kfu;e la[;kad 16½ dh /kkjk 5

}kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mi&rglhy] uu[kM+h] ftyk f”keyk] fgekpy izns'k dk ntkZ

c<+kdj rqjUr izHkko ls bl vf/klwpuk ds ikaposa LrEHk esa nf'kZr 15 iVokj o`Ÿkksa ls xfBr rglhy dk djrs

gSa%&

rglhy

mi&e.My

ftyk

eq[;ky;

iVokj o`Ùk

1

2

3

4

5

uu[kM+h

jkeiqj

f”keyk

uu[kM+h

1- “kksyh

2- Fkkuk&uu[kM+h

3- iwuu

4- tkgw

5- [kwUuh iuksyh

6- [kM+kgu

7- cxyrh

8- trjky

9- nsyB

10- ySyu

11- cM+kp

12- dyeksx&nkj.k

13- e>kSyh

14- [kekMh

15- FkSyh&p[kVh

mi&rglhy uu[kM+h dk ntkZ c<+kdj rglhy dk djus ds QyLo:Ik jkeiqj rglhy dh lajpuk

fuEu izdkj ls gksxh %&

rglhy

mi&e.My

ftyk

Rkglhy esa lfEefyr iVokj o`Ùkksa ds uke

1

2

3

4

jkeiqj

jkeiqj

f”keyk

1- p.Mh&czkaMk

2- D;kvks

3- yokuk&lnkuk

4- xkuoh

5- ljikjk

6- nksQnk

7- e>soyh

8- xksikyiqj

9- /kkj xkSjk

10- >kdM+h

11- jpksyh

12- jkeiqj ¼'kgj½

13- f”kxyk

14- Mulk

4950

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939

15- ykylk

16- /kkj

17- dqelw

18- nŸkuxj

19- fujFk

20- nokMk

21- e>soVh

vkns'k }kjk]

oh0 lh0 Qkjdk]

Ekq[; lfpoA

&&&&&&&

[Authoritative English text of this Department Notification No. GAD-B-(A)-1-2/2013-III (Shimla)

dated 11-8-2017 as required under clause(3) of Article 348 of the Constitution of India].

GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT

(B-Section)

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 11th August, 2017

No. GAD-B-(A)-1-2/2013-III (Shimla).—WHEREAS, the Governor of Himachal Pradesh

is of the opinion that it is necessary and expedient in public interest to do so that the present Sub-

Tehsil Nankhari, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh may be upgraded to that of Tehsil with its

Headquarter at Nankhari, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, so as to provide better services to the

concerned people of nearby villages and to avoid inconvenience faced by them pertaining to

revenue work and to have better administrative control.

NOW, THEREFORE, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 6 of the Himachal

Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1954 (Act No. 6 of 1954) and section 5 of the Registration Act, 1908

(Act No. 16 of 1908), the Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to upgrade the Sub-Tehsil

Nankhari, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh to that of Tehsil consisting of 15 Patwar Circles

shown in the 5th column of this notification, with immediate effect :—

Tehsil

Sub-Division

District

Headquarter

Patwar Circles

1

2

3

4

5

Nankhari

Rampur

Shimla

Nankhari

1. Sholi

2. Thana-Nankhari

3. Punan

4. Jahoo

5. Khuni Panoli

6. Kharahan

7. Bagalti

8. Jatral

9. Delath

4951

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939

10. Lelan

11. Barach

12. Kalmog-Daran

13. Majholi

14. Khamadi

15. Thaili Chakhati

On the up-gradation of Sub-Tehsil Nankhari to that of Tehsil, the composition of Tehsil

Rampur will be as under:—

Tehsil

Sub-Division

District

Name of Patwar Circles included in the Tehsil

1

2

3

4

Rampur

Rampur

Shimla

1. Chandi Branda

2. Kyao

3. Labana Sadana

4. Ganvi

5. Sarpara

6. Dofda

7. Majhewali

8. Gopalpur

9. Dhar Goura

10 Jhakri

11. Racholi

12. Rampur (Town)

13. Shingla

14. Dansa

15. Lalsa

16. Dhar

17. Kumsu

18. Duttnagar

19. Nirath

20. Dawara

21. Majhewati

By order,

V. C. PHARKA,

Chief Secretary.

________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 18th April, 2016

No.11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute

exists between Shri Umesh Kumar s/o Shri Devinder Kumar, r/o V.P.O. Galma, Tehsil Balh,

4952

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939

District Mandi, H.P. and (i) the Managing Director, the H.P. State Co-operative Milk Producers’

Federation Limited, Totu, District Shimla, H.P., (ii) the Manager (Production), H.P. State Co-

operative Milk Producers’ Federation Limited, Mandi Unit at Chakkar, P.O. Gutkar, District

Mandi, H.P. (Principal Employer), (iii) Shri Bhupesh Janartha, M/s Shimla Cleanways & Security

Services, Aditya Lodge, Sanjauli, Shimla (Contractor) on the issue of alleged termination from

services w.e.f. 01-09-2013.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per

power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted

under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether termination of the services of Shri Umesh Kumar s/o Shri Devinder Kumar r/o

V.P.O. Galma, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 01-09-2013 by (i) the Managing

Director, the H.P. State Co-operative Milk Producers’ Federation Limited, Totu, District

Shimla, H.P., (ii) the Manager (Production), H.P. State Co-operative Milk Producers’

Federation Limited, Mandi Unit at Chakkar, P.O. Gutkar, District Mandi, H.P. (Principal

Employer), (iii) Shri Bhupesh Janartha, M/s Shimla Cleanways & Security Services, Aditya

Lodge, Sanjauli, Shimla (Contractor), without complying with the provisions of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,

seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the

above employers?”

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 28th April, 2016

No.11-2/86(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute

exists between Shri Vikas s/o Late Shri Ved Prakash, r/o V.P.O. Samirpur, Tehsil & District

Kangra, H.P. and the Incharge, Regional Mountaineering Centre Mcleodganj, Tehsil Dharamshala,

District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services during November, 2013.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

4953

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per

power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted

under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether termination of the services of Shri Vikas s/o Late Shri Ved Prakash, r/o V.P.O.

Samirpur, Tehsil & District Kangra, H.P. during November, 2013 by the Incharge, Regional

Mountaineering Centre Mcleodganj, Tehsil Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P., without

complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If

not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the

above worker is entitled to from the above employer?”

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 5th February, 2016

No. 11-1/7(Lab) ID/2016/Nurpur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute

exists between Shri Ajay Sharma s/o Shri Chuhru Ram Sharma, r/o Village Jangal, P.O. Bagga,

Tehsil Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., (i) the Sub-Divisional Soil Conservation Officer, Fatehpur,

District Kangra, H.P. (Principal Employer), (ii) the President, Farm Technocrats’ Forum Palampur,

District Kangra, H.P. (placement agency) on the issue of alleged termination of his services during

November, 2014.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under sub-section 5 of the Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per

power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted

under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether termination of the services of Shri Ajay Sharma, s/o Shri Chuhru Ram Sharma,

r/o Village Jangal, P.O. Bagga, Tehsil Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. during November, 2014

by (i) the Sub-Divisional Soil Conservation Officer, Fatehpur, District Kangra, H.P.

(Principal Employer), (ii) the President, Farm Technocrats’ Forum Palampur, District

Kangra, H.P. (placement agency), without complying with the provisions of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past

service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above

employers?”

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

4954

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 12th February, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2009/Chamba.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation

Officer, Chamba has submitted a report as provided under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri Amar Singh s/o Shri

Parveen, r/o Village Bithal, P.O. Khargat, Tehsil Bhattiyat, District Chamba, H.P. and the

Executive Engineer, Irrigation-cum-PH Divison, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. as per demand

notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Chamba during year, 2007 submitted by the said ex-

worker regarding his termination of services.

Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that

during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and

amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts

for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said

dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial

dispute.

Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided uder sub-section 5 of

Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above ex-

worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services w.e.f. 30-10-2000

before the above employer after delay of about 7 years and has worked only for 270 days, 296 days,

328 days and 165 days during the years 1997, 1998, 1999 and 2000 respectively.

Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising

the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-

IVLoose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble High

Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for

adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal

Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue:—

“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Amar Singh s/o Shri Parveen, r/o Village

Bithal, P.O. Khargat, Tehsil Bhattiyat, District Chamba, H.P. w.e.f. 30-11-2000 by the

Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. who has worked as

beldar on daily wages basis only for 270 days, 296 days, 328 days and 165 days during the

years 1997, 1998, 1999 and 2000 respectively and has raised his industrial dispute demand

notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Chamba during year, 2007 after delay of

about 7 years, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of working period of 270 days, 296

days, 328 days and 165 days during the years 1997, 1998, 1999 and 2000 respectively and

delay of about 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages,

seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the

above employer/management.

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

4955

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 20th February, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2015/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial

dispute exists between Shri Arif Khan s/o Shri Bashir Mohammad, r/o Village Dhanju, P.O.

Khushnagri, Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, H.P. and (i) the Employer/Managing Director, M/s

GVK Emergency Management and Research Institute, Dharampur, District Solan, H.P. (Principal

Employer), (ii) the Managing Director, M/s Adecco Flexione Workforce Solutions Private Limited,

C-127, Basement Level, Satguru Infotech, Phase-VIII, Industrial Area Mohali, Punjab (Contractor

Company), on the issue of alleged termination of his service w.e.f. 27- 08-2013.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per

power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted

under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether termination of the services of Shri Arif Khan s/o Shri Bashir Mohammad, r/o

Village Dhanju, P.O. Khushnagri, Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, H.P. w.e.f. 27-08-2013

by (i) the Employer/Managing Director, M/s GVK Emergency Management and Research

Institute, Dharampur, District Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer), (ii) the Managing Director,

M/s Adecco Flexione Workforce Solutions Private Limited, C-127, Basement Level,

Satguru Infotech, Phase-VIII, Industrial Area Mohali, Punjab (Contractor Company),

without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and

justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and

compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?”

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 12th February, 2016

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015/Mandi.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation

Officer, Mandi Zone, Mandi has submitted a report as provided under Section 12(4) of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri

Beli Ram s/o Shri Fagnu, r/o Village Bambola, P.O. Tihri, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi, H.P. and

the Executive Engineer, I.& P.H., Division Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. as per demand notice dated

nil received in the Labour Office Mandi on dated 17-09-2014 submitted by the said ex-worker

regarding his termination of services.

4956

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939

Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that

during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and

amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts

for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said

dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial

dispute.

Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided uder sub-section 5 of

Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above ex-

worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during August, 2000

before the above employer after delay of more than 13 years and has worked only for 14 days, 48

days and 27 days in 1998, 1999 and 2000 respectively.

Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising

the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4- 9/2006-

IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble

High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for

adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal

Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue:—

“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Beli Ram s/o Shri Fagnu, r/o Village

Bambola, P.O. Tihri, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi, H.P. during August, 2000 by the

Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Padhar, District Mandi, H.P., who has worked as

beldar on daily wages basis only for 14 days, 48 days and 27 days in 1998, 1999 and 2000

respectively and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 13 years, allegedly without

complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If

not, keeping in view of working period of 14 days, 48 days and 27 days in 1998, 1999 and

2000 respectively and delay of more than 13 years in raising the industrial dispute vide

demand notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Mandi on 17-09-2014, what amount

of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is

entitled to from the above employer/management? ”

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

CORRIGENDUM

Shimla-171001, the 19th February, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2013/Chamba.—In partial modification of this Department’s

Notification of even number dated 27-02-2015, the date of termination of services of workman Shri

Bhagat Ram s/o Shri Saran Dass, r/o V.P.O. Rei, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. may be read

as “September, 2004” instead of “September, 2003”, which was inadvertently recorded in the said

notification.

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

4957

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 16th February, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2016/Chamba.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation

Officer, Chamba has submitted a report as provided under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Smt. Champa w/o Shri

Sham Lal, r/o Village Chaloli, P.O. Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. and the

Executive Engineer, Killar Division, HPPWD, Killar (Pangi), District Chamba, H.P. as per demand

notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Chamba on 29-05-2012 submitted by the said ex-

worker regarding her termination of services.

Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that

during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and

amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts

for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said

dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial

dispute.

Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub-section 5 of

Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above

exworker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during September,

2004 before the above employer after delay of more than 7 years and has worked only for 76, 31,

51, 136, 152, 35, 105, 57, 92, 138, 120, 100, 116 and 88 days during the years 1990, 1991, 1992,

1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 respectively.

Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising

the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV

Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble High

Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for

adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal

Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue:—

“Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Champa w/o Shri Sham Lal r/o Village

Chaloli, P.O. Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004 by the

Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar (Pangi), District Chamba, H.P.,

who has worked as beldar on daily wages basis only for 76, 31, 51, 136, 152, 35, 105, 57,

92, 138, 120, 100, 116 and 88 days during the years 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995,

1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 respectively and has raised her

industrial dispute demand notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Chamba on 29-05-

2012 after delay of more than 7 years, allegedly without complying with the provisions of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of working

period stated above and delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what

amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-

worker is entitled to from the above employer/management? ”

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

4958

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th February, 2016

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2016/Mandi.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation

Officer, Mandi Zone, Mandi has submitted a report as provided under Section 12(4) of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri

Chander Shekhar s/o Shri Baldev Singh, r/o Village Narwalka, P.O. Kamlah Fort, Tehsil Sarkaghat,

District Mandi, H.P. and the Divisional Manager, H.P. State Forest Development Corporation

Limited, Forest Working Division Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. as per demand notice dated

26-05-2014 submitted by the said exworker regarding his termination of services.

Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that

during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and

amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts

for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said

dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial

dispute.

Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub-section 5 of

Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above ex-

worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services w.e.f. 22-01-1995

before the above employer after delay of more than 18 years and has worked only from 01-05-1994

to 21-01-1995.

Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising

the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-

Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon’ble High

Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for

adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal

Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue:—

“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Chander Shekhar s/o Shri Baldev Singh,

r/o Village Narwalka, P.O. Kamlah Fort, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 22-

01-1995 by the Divisional Manager, H.P. State Forest Development Corporation Limited,

Forest Working Division Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P., who has worked as beldar on

daily wages basis only from 01-05-1994 to 21-01-1995 and has raised his industrial dispute

vide demand notice dated 26-05-2014 after more than 18 years, allegedly without

complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If

not, keeping in view of working period from 01-05-1994 to 21-01-1995 and delay of more

than 18 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past

service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above

employer/management? ”

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

4959

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th February, 2016

No. 11-3/93(Lab) ID/2016/Kullu.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute

exists between Shri Daulat Ram s/o Late Shri Het Ram, r/o Village Tanaru, P.O. Nagwain, Sub-

Tehsil Aut, District Mandi, H.P. and (i) the Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture

and Forestry, Nauni, District Solan, H.P., (ii) the Assosiate Director (R&E), Dr. Y.S. Parmar

University of Horticulture and Forestry, Regional Horticulture Research Station Bajaura, District

Kullu, H.P. on the issue of alleged time to time termination of his services during year, 1996 to 17-

06-2013 and finally w.e.f. 18-06-2013.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the

Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but

could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power

vested under sub-section 5 of the Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this

dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal

Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per

power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)

this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted

under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—

“Whether time to time termination of the services of Shri Daulat Ram s/o Late Shri Het

Ram, r/o Village Tanaru, P.O. Nagwain, Sub-Tehsil Aut, District Mandi, H.P. during year,

1996 to 17-06-2013 and finally w.e.f. 18-06-2013 (as alleged by workman) by (i) the

Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, District Solan,

H.P., (ii) the Assosiate Director (R&E), Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and

Forestry, Regional Horticulture Research Station Bajaura, District Kullu, H.P., without

complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If

not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the

above worker is entitled to from the above employers?”

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

________

OFFICE OF THE RETURNING OFFICER

CENTRAL COUNCIL FOR INDIAN MEDICINE ELECTION

REGIONAL AYURVEDIC HOSPITAL, SHIMLA-171002

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 02nd August, 2017

No. CCIM/Election/HP-I/2016-100.—As per election programme notified on 12-6-2017

after withdrawal of the nomination papers, the following candidates are in the fray for contesting

the Central Council for Indian Medicine Election from the State of Himachal Pradesh:—

4960

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939

Sr. No.

Name and address of the candidate duly nominated to represent Ayurveda

System of Medicine

1.

Dr. Ashok Kumar Sharma s/o Shri Jai Karan Dass, r/o VPO Bela, Tehsil Nadaun,

Distt. Hamirpur, H.P.

2.

Dr. Dinesh Kumar, s/o Shri. Dila Ram r/o Jalpa Niwas, Mohalla Mai Ka Bagh,

Tehsil and Distt. Chamba, H.P.

3.

Dr. Suneet Kumar Pathania s/o Shri Karam Singh Pathania, V&PO Rait, Tehsil

Shahpur, Distt. Kangra, H.P.

4.

Dr. Virender Kaul s/o Shri Jitender Kaul, r/o Gauri Niwas, Ustehar, Baijnath,

Distt. Kangra, H.P.

By order,

(Dr. R. K. PRUTHI, I.A.S.),

Returning Officer,

Central Council for Indian Medicine Election,

H.P.Shimla-171002.

&&&&&&&&

In the Court of Shri Rohit Rathour, H.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate,

Kullu, District Kullu, H.P.

In the matter of :

1.

Ravi Raj s/o Shri Sher Singh, resident of Village Chharaihara, Post Office Mohal,

Tehsil Bhunter, District Kullu, H.P.

2.

Geetanjali Shashni d/o Shri Mohan Lal Shashni, resident of Village Chharaihara, Post

Office Mohal, Ward No. 6, Tehsil Bhunter, District Kullu, H.P.

. . Applicants.

Versus

General Public

Subject.—Proclamation for the registration of Marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act,

1954.

Ravi Raj and Geetanjali Shashni have filed an application on dated 29-07-2017 alongwith

affidavits in the court of undersigned under section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have

solemnized their marriage on 26-08-2015 and they are living as husband and wife since then, hence

their marriage may be registered under Act, ibid.

Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who

has any objection regarding this marriage can file the objection personally or writing before this

court on or before 29-08-2017. The objection received after 29-08-2017 will not be entertained and

marriage will be registered accordingly.

4961

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939

Issued today on 29-07-2017 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

ROHIT RATHOUR (HAS),

Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate,

Kullu, District Kullu, H.P.

____________

c vnkyr rglhynkj ,oa dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh] Åuk+] rglhy o

ftyk Åuk ¼fg0 iz0½

Jh fjadh nsoh

cuke

vke turk

nj[okLr tsj /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q jftLVªhdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969-

uksfVl cuke turk vkeA

Jherh fjadh nsoh iRuh Jh 'k'kh iky] fuoklh okMZ ua0 9 cgMkyk] rglhy Åuk+] ftyk Åuk us

bl vnkyr esa nj[okLr nh gS fd mldh iq=h Hkkouk dk tUe xkao ugMky] rglhy o ftyk Åuk esa

fnukad 08&08&2014 dks gqvk Fkk] ijUrq bl ckjs iapk;r ds fjdkWMZ esa iathdj.k ugha djok;k tk ldkA

vc iathdj.k djus ds vkns'k fn, tk,aA

vr% bl uksfVl ds ek/;e ls loZlk/kkj.k dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh O;fDr dks

mijksDr tUe ds iathdj.k gksus ckjs dksbZ mtj@,rjkt gks rks og fnukad 31&08&2017 dks izkr% nl

cts v/kksgLrk{kjh ds le{k vlkyru@odkyru gkftj vkdj is'k dj ldrk gS vU;Fkk mijksDr tUe dk

iathdj.k djus ds vkns'k ns fn, tk,axsA

vkt fnukad 31&07&2017 dks gLrk{kj esjs o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh gqvkA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

rglhynkj ,oa dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]

Åuk] ftyk Åuk ¼fg0 iz0½A

4962

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 17 vxLr] 2017@26 Jko.k] 1939

fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr

bysDVªkWfud gLrk{kfjr jkti=] oSclkbV http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in ij miyC/k gS ,oe~ vkWuykbu lR;kfir fd;k tk ldrk gS