jkti=] fgekpy izns'k
fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr
lkseokj] 29 tuojh] 2018@09 ek?k] 1939
fgekpy izns'k ljdkj
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 19th May, 2017
No.: 11-6/85(Lab) ID/2017/Shimla/Ram Singh.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Shimla Zone, Distt. Shimla has submitted a report as provided u/s 12(4) of the
224&jkti=@2017&29&01&2018
¼10165½
10166
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 29 tuojh] 2018@09 ek?k] 1939
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between
Sh. Ram Singh s/o Sh. Bhagat Ram, Village Panhera, P.O. Chaba, Tehsil Sunni, Distt. Shimla, H.P.
and The Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Shimla, Distt. Shimla, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested
under Sub-Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is
required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Ram Singh s/o Sh. Bhagat Ram, Village Panhera,
P.O. Chaba, Tehsil Sunni, Distt. Shimla, (H.P.) w.e.f. 01.3.2016 by the Divisional Forest
Officer, Forest Division Shimla, Distt. Shimla, H.P., allegedly without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what relief
including reinstatement, amount of back wages, past service benefits and compensation the
above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 18th May, 2017
No.: 11-1/86(Lab) ID/2017/Nahan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Rameshwar s/o Sh. Jodh Singh, r/o Village
Deed Baggar, P.O. Paner, Tehsil Nahan, Distt. Sirmour, H.P. and (i) The Manager, HPPCL,
Renuka Ji Dam Project, Dadahu, Distt. Sirmour, H.P. (Principal Employer) (ii) Sh. Sanjay Kumar
(Contractor), Village Mohtu, P.O. Rajana, Tehsil Sangrah, Distt. Sirmour, H.P.
Whereas, the Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during
the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable
settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the
purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute.
However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
10167
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 29 tuojh] 2018@09 ek?k] 1939
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Rameshwar s/o Sh. Jodh Singh, r/o Village Deed
Baggar, P. O. Panar, Tehsil Nahan, Distt. Sirmour, H. P., who was engaged by (i) The
Manager, HPPCL, Renuka Ji Dam Project, Dadahu, Distt. Sirmour, H. P. (Principal
Employer) through Sh. Sanjay Kumar (Contractor), Village Mohtu, P.O. Rajana, Tehsil
Sangrah, Distt. Sirmour, H.P., by Sh. Sanjay Kumar (Contractor) during September,
2015, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 19th May, 2017
No.: 11-6/85(Lab) ID/2017/Shimla/Roshan Lal.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Shimla Zone, Distt. Shimla has submitted a report as provided u/s 12(4) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between
Sh. Roshan Lal s/o Sh. Devinder Village Sakrari, P. O. Chaba, Tehsil Sunni, Distt. Shimla, H. P.
and The Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Shimla, Distt. Shimla, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested
under Sub-Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is
required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
10168
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 29 tuojh] 2018@09 ek?k] 1939
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Roshan Lal s/o Sh. Devinder Village-Sakrari, P.O.
Chaba, Tehsil Sunni, Distt. Shimla, (H.P.) w.e.f. 01-3-2016 by the Divisional Forest Officer,
Forest Division Shimla, Distt. Shimla, H.P., allegedly without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what relief
including reinstatement, amount of back wages, past service benefits and compensation the
above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 18th May, 2017
No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2017/Baddi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute
about the following issue exist between Sh. Santosh Kumar s/o Sh. Kapil Dev Singh, r/o Village
Khokra, P. O. Nanakpur, Tehsil Kalka, Distt. Panchkula, Haryana Vs The Factory Manager, M/s
Fresenius Kabi Oncology Ltd. ( Formerly Dabur Pharma Limited), Plot No. 19, HPSIDC, Industrial
Area Baddi-173205, Distt. Solan, H. P. as per demand notice dated 07-6-2016.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Santosh Kumar s/o Sh. Kapil Dev Singh, r/o
Village Khokra, P.O. Nanakpur, Tehsil Kalka, Distt. Panchkula, Haryana w.e.f. 09-5-2016,
after conducting domestic enquiry, by the management of M/s Fresenius Kabi Oncology
Ltd. (Formerly Dabur Pharma Limited), Plot No. 19, HPSIDC, Industrial Area
Baddi-173205, Distt. Solan, H.P. without complying with the provisions of the Industrial
10169
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 29 tuojh] 2018@09 ek?k] 1939
Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what relief including reinstatement, amount
of back wages, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to
from the above employers/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 30th May, 2017
No.: 11-6/85(Lab) ID/2017/Shimla.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Shobha Ram s/o Late Sh. Kesru, r/o Village
Jagohi, P.O. Devdhar, Tehsil Gohar, Distt. Mandi, H.P. presently residing at Nav Bahar in the
office of Horticulture Department, Shimla-2 Vs. The Director of Horticulture, Nav Bahar,
Shimla-2., H.P.
Whereas, the Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during
the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable
settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the
purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute.
However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Shobha Ram s/o Late Sh. Kesru, r/o Village Jagohi,
P.O. Devdhar, Tehsil Gohar, Distt. Mandi, (H.P.) who was employed as Safai Karamchari
on contract basis, by The Director of Horticulture, Nav Bahar, Shimla-2., H.P. w.e.f.
01-4-2016 allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947 is legal and justified? If not, what relief including reinstatement, amount of back
wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to
from the above employers ?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
10170
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 29 tuojh] 2018@09 ek?k] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 19th May, 2017
No.: 11-6/85(Lab) ID/2017/Shimla/Surender Singh.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Shimla Zone, Distt. Shimla has submitted a report as provided u/s 12(4) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between
Sh. Surender Singh s/o Sh. Teka Ram, Village Jandar, P.O. Basantpur, Tehsil Sunni, Distt. Shimla,
H.P. and The Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Shimla, Distt. Shimla, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested
under Sub-Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is
required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Surender Singh s/o Sh. Teka Ram, Village Jandar,
P.O. Basantpur, Tehsil Sunni, Distt. Shimla, (H.P.) w.e.f. 01-3-2016 by the Divisional
Forest Officer, Forest Division Shimla, Distt. Shimla, H.P., allegedly without complying
with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what
relief including reinstatement, amount of back wages, past service benefits and
compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 19th May, 2017
No.: 11-6/85(Lab) ID/2017/Shimla/Yog Raj.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Shimla Zone, Distt. Shimla has submitted a report as provided u/s 12(4) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between
10171
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 29 tuojh] 2018@09 ek?k] 1939
Sh. Yog Raj s/o Sh. Khem Dass, Village Jaishi, P.O. Bharara, Tehsil Sunni, Distt. Shimla, H.P. and
The Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Shimla, Distt. Shimla, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested
under Sub-Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is
required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Yog Raj s/o Sh. Khem Dass, Village Jaishi, P.O.
Bharara, Tehsil Sunni, Distt. Shimla, (H.P.) w.e.f. 01-3-2016 by the Divisional Forest
Officer, Forest Division Shimla, Distt. Shimla, H.P., allegedly without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what relief
including reinstatement, amount of back wages, past service benefits and compensation the
above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 19th May, 2017
No.: 11-6/85(Lab) ID/2017/Shimla.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Shimla Zone, Distt. Shimla has submitted a report as provided u/s 12(4) of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Sh. Yog Raj s/o
Sh. Paras Ram, Village Panehra, P.O. Chaba, Tehsil Sunni, Distt. Shimla, H.P.Vs The Divisional
Forest Officer, Forest Division Shimla, Distt. Shimla, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
10172
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 29 tuojh] 2018@09 ek?k] 1939
The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested
under Sub-Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is
required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Yog Raj s/o Sh. Paras Ram, Village Panehra, P.O.
Chaba, Tehsil Sunni, Distt. Shimla, (H.P.) w.e.f. 01-3-2016 by the Divisional Forest Officer,
Forest Division Shimla, Distt. Shimla, H.P., allegedly without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what relief
including reinstatement, amount of back wages, past service benefits and compensation the
above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 07th June, 2017
No.: 11-6/85(Lab) ID/2017/Shimla/Bhupinder.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Shimla Zone, Distt. Shimla has submitted a report as provided u/s 12(4) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between
Sh. Bhupinder Singh s/o Sh. Paras Ram, Village Panhera, P.O. Chaba, Tehsil Sunni, Distt. Shimla,
H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Shimla, Distt. Shimla, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested
under Sub-Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is
required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
10173
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 29 tuojh] 2018@09 ek?k] 1939
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Bhupinder Singh s/o Sh. Paras Ram, Village
Panhera, P.O. Chaba, Tehsil Sunni, Distt. Shimla, H.P. w.e.f. 01-4-2016 by the Divisional
Forest Officer, Forest Division Shimla, Distt. Shimla, H.P., allegedly without complying
with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what
relief including reinstatement, amount of back wages, past service benefits and
compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 07th June, 2017
No.: 11-6/85(Lab) ID/2017/Shimla/Devi Ram.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Shimla Zone, Distt. Shimla has submitted a report as provided u/s 12(4) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Sh.
Devi Ram s/o Sh. Tika Ram, Village Jander, P.O. Basantpur, Tehsil Sunni, Distt. Shimla, H.P. Vs
The Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Shimla, Distt. Shimla, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested
under Sub-Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is
required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Devi Ram s/o Sh. Tika Ram, Village Jander, P.O.
Basantpur, Tehsil Sunni, Distt. Shimla, H.P. during April, 2016 by the Divisional Forest
Officer, Forest Division Shimla, Distt. Shimla, H.P., allegedly without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what relief
including reinstatement, amount of back wages, past service benefits and compensation the
above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
10174
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 29 tuojh] 2018@09 ek?k] 1939
fgekpy izns'k fof|K ifj"kn~
BAR COUNCIL OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
High Court Complex, Raveneswood, Shimla-171 001
NOTICE
Dated : 24th January, 2018
Ref. No. 75/18.—As per direction of the Bar Council of India and Under Rule 7 the Election Rules
of Bar Council of Himachal Pradesh the Programme/Schedule for the Election of the Members of the Bar
Council of Himachal Pradesh will be as under:—
ELECTION SCHEDULE
1.
Publication of Notice in Official Gazette and
25-01-2018
two Daily Newspapers one in English and
another in Regional Language.
2.
Filing of Nominations.
01-02-2018
3.
Last date for receipt of nominations.
15-02-2018
4.
Last date of withdrawal of nominations.
22-02-2018
5.
Publication of final list of candidates.
01-03-2018
6.
Date of Election.
28-03-2018
By order,
SMITA THAKUR,
Secretary.
__________
c vnkyr fookg iathdj.k vf/kdkjh] cM+lj] mi&e.My cM+lj] ftyk gehjiqj] fg0 iz0
1.
lqjsUnz dqekj iq= Jh I;kj pUn] xkao lerkuk [kqnZ] Mk0 lerkuk] rg0 <Voky] ftyk gehjiqj
fg0 iz0A
2.
dqlqe iq=h Jh jkegsj] xkao xksyk] Mk0 ifjxUt] rg0 o ftyk cjsyh ¼U.P.½
- - izkFkhZA
cuke
vke turk
- - izfroknhA
vke turk dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ ,d o nks us bl U;k;ky; esa fookg iathdj.k
djokus dk vkosnu fd;k gSA vr% bl b'rgkj }kjk vke turk o mijksDr vkosnudrkZ ds ekrk&firk dks
10175
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 29 tuojh] 2018@09 ek?k] 1939
bl fookg ds iathdj.k ckjs ,rjkt gks rks fnukad 30&03&2018 ;k blls iwoZ izkr% 10-00 cts bl
U;k;ky; esa vkifŸk ntZ djok ldrs gSaA bl frfFk ds ckn dksbZ mtj Lohdkj ugha fd;k tkosxkA
vkt fnukad 16&01&2018 dks esjs gLrk{kj ,oa eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh fd;k x;kA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
fookg iathdj.k vf/kdkjh]
cM+lj] mi&e.My cM+lj] ftyk gehjiqj] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&
c vnkyr fookg iathdj.k vf/kdkjh] cM+lj] mi&e.My cM+lj] ftyk gehjiqj] fg0 iz0
1.
jktho dqekj lqiq= Jhjke 'kekZ] xkao o Mkd?kj lykS.kh] rg0 cM+lj] ftyk gehjiqj fg0 iz0A
2.
lksek nsoh lqiq=h jks'ku yky] xkao xqtjsM+k] Mkd?kj cYglks.kk] rg0 >aMwrk] ftyk fcykliqj]
¼fg0 iz0½A
- - izkFkhZA
cuke
vke turk
- - izfroknhA
vke turk dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ ,d o nks us bl U;k;ky; esa fookg iathdj.k
djokus dk vkosnu fd;k gSA vr% bl b'rgkj }kjk vke turk o mijksDr vkosnudrkZ ds ekrk&firk dks
bl fookg dh vuqefr iznku djus ckjs ,rjkt gks rks fnukad 20&02&2018 ;k blls iwoZ izkr% 10-00 cts
bl U;k;ky; esa vkifŸk ntZ djok ldrs gSaA bl frfFk ds ckn dksbZ mtj Lohdkj ugha fd;k tkosxkA
vkt fnukad 18&01&2018 dks esjs gLrk{kj ,oa eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh fd;k x;kA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
fookg iathdj.k vf/kdkjh]
cM+lj] mi&e.My cM+lj] ftyk gehjiqj] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&&
c vnkyr fookg iathdj.k vf/kdkjh] cM+lj] mi&e.My cM+lj] ftyk gehjiqj] fg0 iz0
1.
lquhy dqekj lqiq= Jh Bkdqj nkl] xkao pylkbZ] Mkd?kj /kaxksV] rg0 cM+lj] ftyk gehjiqj
¼fg0 iz0½ 176039-
2.
liuk nsoh iRuh Jh vej pUn] xkao >M;k.k] Mkd?kj dlokM+] rg0 cM+lj ftyk
gehjiqj¼fg0 iz0½ 174312-
- - izkFkhZA
cuke
vke turk
- - izfroknhA
10176
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 29 tuojh] 2018@09 ek?k] 1939
vke turk dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ ,d o nks us bl U;k;ky; esa fookg iathdj.k
djokus dk vkosnu fd;k gSA vr% bl b'rgkj }kjk vke turk o mijksDr vkosnudrkZ ds ekrk&firk dks
bl fookg ds iathdj.k ckjs ,rjkt gks rks fnukad 30&03&2018 ;k blls iwoZ izkr% 10-00 cts bl
U;k;ky; esa vkifŸk ntZ djok ldrs gSaA bl frfFk ds ckn dksbZ mtj Lohdkj ugha fd;k tkosxkA
vkt fnukad 18&01&2018 dks esjs gLrk{kj ,oa eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh fd;k x;kA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
fookg iathdj.k vf/kdkjh]
cM+lj] mi&e.My cM+lj] ftyk gehjiqj] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&&
c vnkyr Jh izdk'k pUn 'kekZ lgk;d lekgrkZ izFke Js.kh] i/kj] rglhy i/kj] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½
muoku eqdíek % 37¼2½
rkjh[k is'kh % 06&02&2018
fge: jke iq= Jh vPN:] fuoklh fugks.k] Mk0 dqQjh] rglhy i/kj] ftyk e.Mh] fg0 iz0A
--izkFkhZA
cuke
vke turk
--izR;kFkhZA
vkosnu i=%&tsj /kkjk 37¼2½ ds vUrxZr uke n:Lr djus ckjkA
vkosnd fge: jke iq= Jh vPN:] fuoklh fugks.k] Mk0 dqQjh] rglhy i/kj] ftyk e.Mh] fg0 iz0
us bl vnkyr esa vkosnu i= xqtkjk gS fd mldk uke xzke iapk;r dqQjh ds fjdkMZ o vU; dkxtkr esa
fge: uke ntZ gS tcfd egky fugks.k@547 ds reke Hkw0 jktLo vfHkys[kksa esa mldk uke Hkknj flag ntZ
gS tks xyr ntZ gqvk gSA rFkk vkosnd us bl vnkyr ls izkFkZuk dh gS fd mldk uke Hkknj flag ds
LFkku ij fge: jke uke ntZ djus ds fyf[kr vkns'k fn;s tkosaA
vr% bl bZ'rgkj }kjk vke turk dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh O;fDr dks mDr uke
ntZ djus ckjk dksbZ mtj@,rjkt gks rks og vlkyru ;k odkyru rkjh[k is'kh 06&02&2018 dks lqcg
10-00 cts gkftj gksdj viuk mtj is'k dj ldrk gS clwjr xSjgkftj ,drjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ
tkdj mfpr vkns'k ikfjr dj fn, tk,axsA
;g bZ'rgkj vkt fnukad 09&01&2018 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
lgk;d lekgrkZ izFke Js.kh]
i/kj] rglhy i/kj] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½A
&&&&&&&&&&&
In the Court of Shri Raghav Sharma (I.A.S.), Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional
Magistrate, Chachyot at Gohar, District Mandi (H. P.)
In the matter of :—
1.
Shri Sunil Kumar s/o Shri Nand Lal, r/o Chawan, P.O. Segali, Tehsil Chachyot,
District Mandi, H.P.
10177
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 29 tuojh] 2018@09 ek?k] 1939
2.
Smt. Rukmani d/o Badri Nath, r/o Ganai, P.O. Chail Chowk, Tehsil Chachyot, District
Mandi (H. P.)
. . Applicants.
Versus
General Public
Subject.— Proclamation for registration of Marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act,
1954.
Shri Sunil Kumar and Smt. Rukmani have filed an application on 15-01-2018 alongwith
affidavits in the court of undersigned under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they
have solemnized their marriage on 19-04-2017 and they are living as husband and wife since then
and hence their marriage may be registered under Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who
has any objection regarding this marriage can file the objection personally or in writing before this
court on or before 15-02-2018. The objection received after 15-02-2018 will not be entertained and
marriage will be registered accordingly.
Issued today on 16-01-2018 under my hand and seal of the court.
Seal.
RAGHAV SHARMA,
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Chachyot at Gohar, District Mandi (H.P.).
____________
le{k rglhynkj ,oe~ lgk;d lekgrkZ izFke Js.kh] yMHkM+ksy] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½
Jh xqMw jke iq= pek: jke] fuoklh f=.< NUNsgM] Mk0 xaxksVh] rglhy yMHkM+ksy] ftyk e.Mh
¼fg0 iz0½
- - izkFkhA
cuke
vke turk
- - Qjhd nks;e
Jh xqMw jke iq= pek: jke] fuoklh f=.< NUNsgM] Mk0 xaxksVh] rglhy yMHkM+ksy] ftyk e.Mh
¼fg0 iz0½ us 'kiFk&i= lfgr vkosnu fd;k gS fd izkFkhZ dk okLrfod uke xqMw jke gS ijUrq jktLo
vfHkys[k eqgky NUNsgM esa izkFkhZ dk uke xqMw ntZ gS tks xyr gSA vc uke n#Lrh ntZ djokus ckjs
fuosnu fd;k gSA
vr% bl b'rgkj }kjk vke turk dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh O;fDr dks mDr uke
n#Lrh ntZ djus ckjk dksbZ mtj@,rjkt gks rks og vlkyru ;k odkyru rkjh[k is'kh fnukad
12&02&2018 dks 10 cts bl vnkyr esa gkftj gks dj viuk mtj is'k dj ldrk gSA clwjr xSjgkftj
,d rjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ tkdj uke n#Lrh ntZ djus ds vkns'k ikfjr dj fn, tk,axsA
;g b'rgkj vkt fnukad 10&01&2018 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj lfgr vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh]
yMHkM+ksy] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½A
10178
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 29 tuojh] 2018@09 ek?k] 1939
c vnkyr dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh] ukykx<+] ftyk lksyu] fg0 iz0
eq0 ua0 % 1@2018
rkjh[k jtqvk % 17&1&2018-
lqPpk flag
cuke
vke turk
nkok vUrxZr /kkjk 8¼4½ fookg iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1996-
mijksDr eqdíek muoku okyk esa izkFkhZ us izkFkZuk&i= fn;k gS fd mldh 'kknh fnukad 7&10&2013
dks Jherh jhuw nsoh iq=h Jh deZ flag] fuoklh fVDdjh] rglhy ukykx<+] ftyk lksyu ds lkFk gqbZ gSA
vr% vke turk dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd lqPpk flag o jhuw nsoh dh 'kknh dk bUnzkt xzke
iapk;r eU>ksyh esa ntZ djokus ckjs fdlh dks dksbZ ,rjkt gS rks og fnukad 14&2&2018 dks bl
dk;kZy; esa mifLFkr vkdj ,rjkt izLrqr dj ldrk gS vU;Fkk fnukad 17&2&2018 dks mDr 'kknh ds
iathdj.k gsrq vkxkeh dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ tk,xhA
vkt fnukad 17&1&2018 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]
ukykx<+] ftyk lksyuA
&&&&&&&
PUBLIC NOTICE
I, Narotam Singh Ex Indian Navy No. 096496K Rank Mech. (P) III s/o Late Shri Parma
Nand r/o Village & P.O. Baldwara, Tehsil Baldwara, Distt. Mandi, H.P. do hereby solemnly affirm
that the name of my wife has been wrongly recorded as Shakuntla Thakur in my Service Pension
Book of Navy. The coorrect name of my wife is Shakuntla Devi as per the Panchayat record and
Adhar Card. Through this notice it is informed that in future my wife be called by her correct name
Shakuntla Devi and the name be corrected in my Service Pension Book and Kinder Roll record and
other revenue records.
NAROTAM SINGH,
s/o Lt. Sh. Parma Nand,
r/o Village & Post Office Baldwara,
Tehsil Baldwara, Distt. Mandi, Himachal Pradesh.
________
CHANGE OF NAME
I, Ajay Kumar Verma s/o D. R. Verma, r/o Sai Orchards Naya Gaon, Village & P.O. Majra,
Tehsil Paonta Sahib, Distt. Sirmaur (H. P.) 173021, have changed my name to Ajay Verma.
AJAY VERMA
s/o Sh. D. R. Verma,
r/o Sai Orchards Naya Gaon,
Village Majra, Tehsil Paonta Sahib,
Distt. Sirmaur (H.P.).
fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr
bysDVªkWfud gLrk{kfjr jkti=] oSclkbV http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in ij miyC/k gS ,oe~ vkWuykbu lR;kfir fd;k tk ldrk gS