jkti=] fgekpy izns'k
fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr
“kqØokj] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
fgekpy izns'k ljdkj
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 31 August, 2017
No.: 11-1/18(Lab)I.D./2017-Sunder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute exists between Shri Thakur Dass S/O Shri Bhagat Ram, R/O Village Saran, P.O.
235&jkti=@2017&16&02&2018
¼10561½
10562
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
Chowki, Sub Tehsil Nihri, District Mandi, H.P. and The Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest
Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of termination from services.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per
power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala, constituted
under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication: —
“Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Thakur Dass S/O Shri Bhagat Ram,
R/O Village Saran, P.O. Chowki, Sub Tehsil Nihri, District Mandi, H.P. from time to time
during year, 1994 and finally terminated during June, 2016 by the Divisional Forest Officer,
Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and
justified? If not, what amount of back wages, past service benefits, seniority, regularization
and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 17th August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/ Anil Kumar.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Anil Kumar S/O Late Sh. Nar Bhadur
R/O Village & P.O. Khawangi, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s
Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa,
Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the
report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal
and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all
efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the
said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the
industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
10563
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld.
Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal
adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Anil Kumar S/O Sh. Late Sh. Nar Bhadur R/O
Village & P.O. Khawangi, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s
Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil
Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 26-3-2016, allegedly without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employer/ management?
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 23rd August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/Arjun.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Arjun Singh S/O Sh. Ramesh Chand,
R/O Village Kuppa, P.O. Kamroo, Tehsil Sangla, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The General Manager,
M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil
Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld.
Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal
adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Arjun Singh S/O Sh. Ramesh Chand, R/O Village
Kuppa, P.O. Kamroo, Tehsil Sangla, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s
10564
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil
Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 18-3-2016, allegedly without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employer/ management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 02nd August, 2017
No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2017/Solan/Asha Devi.—Whereas the Labour Inspector-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Solan Circle, Distt. Solan has submitted a report as provided u/s 12(4) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Ms.
Asha Devi D/O Sh. Bal Bahadur, VPO Gaura, Tehsil Kandaghat, Distt. Solan, H.P. Vs The
Registrar, LLR Group of Institute, Village Jabli-Kyar, P.O. Oachghat, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested
under Sub-Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is
required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
1.
“Whether termination of services of Ms. Asha Devi D/O Sh. Bal Bahadur, VPO Gaura,
Tehsil Kandaghat, Distt. Solan, H.P. by The Registrar, LLR Group of Institute, Village
Jabli-Kyar, P.O. Oachghat, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, (H.P.) w.e.f. 16-11-2016 without
complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, what relief including reinstatement, amount of back wages, seniority,
past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the
above employer/management ?”
10565
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
2.
“Whether action of the management of M/s LLR Group of Institute, Village Jabli-
Kyar, P.O. Oachghat, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, (H.P.) to engage the services of a fresh/
junior workman without paying legal dues to the senior workman i.e. Ms. Asha Devi
D/O Sh. Bal Bahadur, VPO Gaura, Tehsil Kandaghat, Distt. Solan, H.P., without
following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If
not, what relief and other service benefits the above aggrieved workman is entitled to
from said employer/institute?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 26th August, 2017
No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2017/Solan/Babli.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Solan Zone, Distt. Solan has submitted a report as provided u/s 12(4) of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Sh. Babli S/O Sh.
Mast Ram, Village Kothi, P.O. Hanuman Barog, Tehsil Arki, Distt. Solan, H.P. and The Registrar,
Maharishi Markendeshwar Medical College and Hospital, Village Lado, P.O. Sultanpur, Tehsil &
Distt. Solan, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested
under Sub-Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is
required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Babli S/O Sh. Mast Ram, Village Kothi, P.O.
Hanuman Barog, Tehsil Arki, Distt. Solan, H.P. by the Registrar, Maharishi Markendeshwar
Medical College and Hospital, Village Lado, P.O. Sultanpur, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, (H.P.)
w.e.f. 15-7-2015 through oral orders, without complying with the provisions of the
10566
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, what
amount of back wages, reinstatement, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management ?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 05th August, 2017
No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2017/Baddi/Balbir.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Balbir Singh S/O Sh. Jaswant Singh, Village-
Beer Plassi, P.O. Manjholi, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, H.P. Vs The Factory Manager, M/s
Concept Industries, Village Dherowal, P.O. Manjholi, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Balbir Singh S/O Sh. Jaswant Singh, Village- Beer
Plassi, P.O. Manjholi, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, (H.P.), w.e.f. 26-6-2016 by the Factory
Manager, M/s Concept Industries, Village Dherowal, P.O. Manjholi, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt.
Solan, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as
alleged by workman, is legal and justified? If not, what relief including reinstatement,
amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-
worker is entitled to from above employer/ management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
10567
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 02nd August, 2017
No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2017/Solan/Balwant.—Whereas the Labour Inspector-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Solan Circle, Distt. Solan has submitted a report as provided u/s 12(4) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Sh.
Balwant Singh S/O Sh. Mehar Singh, Village- Bajrol ( Kailar), P.O. Saproon, Tehsil & Distt.
Solan, H.P. Vs The Registrar, LLR Group of Institute, Village Jabli-Kyar, P.O. Oachghat, Tehsil &
Distt. Solan, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested
under Sub-Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is
required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
1.
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Balwant Singh S/O Sh. Mehar Singh, Village-
Bajrol ( Kailar), P.O. Saproon, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H.P. by The Registrar, LLR
Group of Institute, Village Jabli-Kyar, P.O. Oachghat, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, (H.P.)
w.e.f. 16.11.2016 without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947 is legal and justified? If not, what relief including reinstatement, amount of back
wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employer/management ?”
2.
“Whether action of the management of M/s LLR Group of Institute, Village Jabli-
Kyar, P.O. Oachghat, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, (H.P.) to engage the services of a
fresh/junior workman without paying legal dues to the senior workman i.e. Sh.
Balwant Singh S/O Sh. Mehar Singh, Village- Bajrol ( Kailar), P.O. Saproon, Tehsil &
Distt. Solan, H.P., without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947 is legal and justified? If not, what relief and other service benefits the above
aggrieved workman is entitled to from said employer/institute?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
10568
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 23rd August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/ Chander Prakash.—It appears to the undersigned
that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Chander Prakash S/O Sh.
Sonam Negi, R/O Village Powari, P.O. Shongtong, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The
General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project,
Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the
report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal
and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all
efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the
said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the
industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld.
Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal
adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Chander Prakash S/O Sh. Sonam Negi, R/O Village
Powari, P.O. Shongtong, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s
Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil
Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 18-3-2016, allegedly without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employer/ management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 29th July, 2017
No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2017/Baddi/Dinesh.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Dinesh Kumar S/O Sh. Sher Singh,
10569
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
Village- Khobla, P.O. Nand, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, H.P. Vs The Factory Manager, M/s
Concept Industries, Village Dherowal, P.O. Manjholi, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Dinesh Kumar S/O Sh. Sher Singh, Village-
Khobla, P.O. Nand, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, (H.P.), w.e.f. 03-6-2016 by the Factory
Manager, M/s Concept Industries, Village Dherowal, P.O. Manjholi, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt.
Solan, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as
alleged by workman, is legal and justified? If not, what relief including reinstatement,
amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-
worker is entitled to from above employer/ management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 17th August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/ Ganeshi Lal.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Ganeshi Lal S/O Sh. Sewa Sukh R/O
Village & P.O. Khawangi, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s Patel
Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt.
Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the
report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal
and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all
efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the
10570
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the
industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld.
Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal
adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Ganeshi Lal S/O Sh. Sewa Sukh, R/O Village &
P.O. Khawangi, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel
Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil
Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 26-3-2016, allegedly without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employer/ management?
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 05th August, 2017
No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2017/Baddi/Jagdev.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Jagdev Singh S/O Sh. Rulda Ram,
Village-Ratyor, P.O. Darhota, Distt. Solan, H.P. Vs The Factory Manager, M/s Concept Industries,
Village Dherowal, P.O. Manjholi, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV-
10571
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Jagdev Singh S/O Sh. Rulda Ram, Village- Ratyor,
P.O. Darhota, Distt. Solan, (H.P.), w.e.f. 30-5-2016 by the Factory Manager, M/s Concept
Industries, Village Dherowal, P.O. Manjholi, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, without
complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by workman,
is legal and justified? If not, what relief including reinstatement, amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from
above employer/ management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 11st August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Jai Pal S/O Sh. Sonam Ram, Village Powari,
P.O. Shongtong, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s Patel
Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt.
Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during
the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable
settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the
purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute.
However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld.
Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal
adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Jai Pal S/O Sh. Sonam Ram, Village Powari, P.O.
Shongtong, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel
Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil
Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 26-3-2016, allegedly without complying with the
10572
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employer/ management?
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 17th August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/ Kewal Krishan.—It appears to the undersigned that
an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Kewal Krishan S/O Sh. Lal Chand
R/O Village & P.O. Khawangi, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s
Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa,
Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the
report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal
and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all
efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the
said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the
industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld.
Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal
adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Kewal Krishan S/O Sh. Lal Chand R/O Village &
P.O. Khawangi, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel
Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil
Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 26-3-2016, allegedly without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employer/ management?
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
10573
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 21st August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/ Krishan.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Krishan Kumar S/O Sh. Gopal Chand
R/O Village & P.O. Chansu, Tehsil Sangla, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s
Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa,
Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the
report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal
and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all
efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the
said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the
industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld.
Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal
adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Krishan Kumar S/O Sh. Gopal Chand R/O Village
& P.O. Chansu, Tehsil Sangla, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel
Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil
Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 26-3-2016, allegedly without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employer/ management?
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 26th August, 2017
No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2017/Solan/Madan.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum Conciliation
Officer, Solan Zone, Distt. Solan has submitted a report as provided u/s 12(4) of the Industrial
10574
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Sh. Madan Lal
S/O Sh. Raj Kumar, Village Kumahra, P.O. Kaba Kalan, Tehsil Kasauli, Distt. Solan, H.P. and The
Registrar, Maharishi Markendeshwar Medical College and Hospital, Village Lado, P.O. Sultanpur,
Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested
under Sub-Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is
required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Madan Lal S/O Sh. Raj Kumar, Village
Kumahra, P.O. Kaba Kalan, Tehsil Kasauli, Distt. Solan, H.P. by the Registrar, Maharishi
Markendeshwar Medical College and Hospital, Village Lado, P.O. Sultanpur, Tehsil &
Distt. Solan, (H.P.) w.e.f. 12-2-2015 through oral orders, without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and
justified? If not, what amount of back wages, reinstatement, seniority, past service benefits
and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management
?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 11th August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/Mani Ram.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Mani Ram S/O Sh. Ralu Ram, R/O
Village- Anas, P.O. Nither, Tehsil Nirmand, Distt. Kullu, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s Patel
Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt.
Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the
report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal
10575
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all
efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the
said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the
industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrialm Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld.
Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal
adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Mani Ram S/O Sh. Ralu Ram, R/O Village- Anas,
P.O. Nither, Tehsil Nirmand, Distt. Kullu, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel
Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil
Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 21-9-2016, allegedly without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employer/ management?
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 26th August, 2017
No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2017/Solan/Meenakshi.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum
Conciliation Officer, Solan Zone, Distt. Solan has submitted a report as provided u/s 12(4) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Ms.
Meenakshi Devi D/O Sh. Kamal Jeet, VPO Sultanpur, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H.P. and The
Registrar, Maharishi Markendeshwar Medical College and Hospital, Village Lado, P.O.m
Sultanpur, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
10576
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested
under Sub-Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is
required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of the services of Ms. Meenakshi Devi D/O Sh. Kamal Jeet, VPO
Sultanpur, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H.P. by the Registrar, Maharishi Markendeshwar Medical
College and Hospital, Village Lado, P.O. Sultanpur, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, (H.P.) w.e.f.
11-7-2015 through oral orders, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, what amount
of back wages, reinstatement, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above
exworker is entitled to from the above employer/management ?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 11th August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/ Panna.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Panna Lal S/O Sh. Ram Dass, R/O
Village-Kalangi, P.O. Degerh, Tehsil Anni, Distt. Kullu, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s Patel
Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt.
Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the
report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal
and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all
efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the
said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the
industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld.
10577
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal
adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Panna Lal S/O Sh. Ram Dass, R/O Village-
Kalangi, P.O. Degerh, Tehsil Anni, Distt. Kullu, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel
Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil
Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 21-9-2016, allegedly without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employer/ management?
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 26th August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/ Pawan.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Pawan Kumar S/O Sh. Dev Bhagti,
R/O Village & P.O. Khawangi, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s
Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa,
Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the
report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal
and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all
efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the
said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the
industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld.
Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal
adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Pawan Kumar S/O Sh. Dev Bhagti, R/O Village &
P.O. Khawangi, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel
Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil
Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 18-3-2016, allegedly without complying with the
10578
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employer/ management?
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 09th August, 2017
No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2017/Solan/LR Institute.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum
Conciliation Officer, Solan, Distt. Solan has submitted a report as provided u/s 12(4) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between The
President/ General Secretary, L.R. Institute Workers Union, Jabli-Kyar, Oachghat, Solan, H.P. Vs
The Registrar, L.R. Group of Institutes, Village Jabli-Kyar, P.O. Oachghat, Tehsil & Distt. Solan,
H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer Solan Circle, has incorporated in
the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a
legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made
all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of
the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the
industrial dispute.
The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested
under Sub-Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is
required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-
IV-Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of the services of office bearers S/Sh. Rattan Lal Gautam (President),
Rajesh Kumar (General Secretary), Rajender Verma (Joint Secretary) of the L.R. Institute
Workers Union, Jabli-Kyar, Oachghat, Solan, (H.P.) by the management of M/s L.R. Group
of Institutes, Village Jabli-Kyar, P.O. Oachghat, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H.P. during the
pendency of conciliation proceedings, in violation of section -33 and without following the
other provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what
amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-
workers are entitled to from the above employer?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
10579
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 21st August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/Raj Kumar.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Raj Kumar S/O Sh. Jai Nand R/O
Village & P.O. Sangla, Tehsil Sangla, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s Patel
Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt.
Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the
report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal
and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all
efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the
said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the
industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld.
Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal
adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Raj Kumar S/O Sh. Jai Nand R/O Village & P.O.
Sangla, Tehsil Sangla, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering
Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt.
Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 30-3-2016, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the
above employer/ management?
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 05th August, 2017
No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2017/Baddi/Rakesh.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Rakesh Kumar S/O Sh. Lekh Ram,
10580
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
R/O Village-Dhalmu, P.O. Ramsahar, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, H.P. Vs The Factory Manager,
M/s Concept Industries, Village Dherowal, P.O. Manjholi, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Rakesh Kumar S/O Sh. Lekh Ram, R/O Village-
Dhalmu, P.O. Ramsahar, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, (H.P.), w.e.f. 01-6-2016 by the
Factory Manager, M/s Concept Industries, Village Dherowal, P.O. Manjholi, Tehsil
Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947, as alleged by workman, is legal and justified? If not, what relief including
reinstatement, amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above ex-worker is entitled to from above employer/ management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 21st August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/ Ram Lal.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Ram Lal S/O Sh. Shanti Lal Negi,
R/O Village & P.O. Chaura, Tehsil Nichar, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s
Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa,
Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the
report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal
and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all
efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the
10581
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the
industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
IndustrialDisputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld. Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Ram Lal S/O Sh. Shanti Lal Negi, R/O Village &
P.O. Chaura, Tehsil Nichar, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel
Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil
Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 26-3-2016, allegedly without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employer/ management?
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 11th August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/ Ranjeet.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Ranjeet Kumar S/O Late Sh.
Chaudhary Ram, R/O Village & P.O. Sathwin, Tehsil Barsar, Distt. Hamirpur, H.P. Vs The
General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project,
Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the
report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal
and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all
efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the
said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the
industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV-
10582
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld.
Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal
adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Ranjeet Kumar S/O Late Sh. Chaudhary Ram, R/O
Village & P.O. Sathwin, Tehsil Barsar, Distt. Hamirpur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s
Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil
Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 21-9-2016, allegedly without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employer/ management?
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 26th August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/ Ravinder.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Ravinder Kumar S/O Sh. Jar Bhag
(Card No. 179, Log Keeper), R/O Village Tangling, P.O. Shongtong, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur,
H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric
Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the
report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal
and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all
efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the
said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the
industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld.
Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal
adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Ravinder Kumar S/O Sh. Jar Bhag (Card No. 179,
Log Keeper), R/O Village Tangling, P.O. Shongtong, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by
the General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric
Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 18-3-2016, allegedly
10583
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 23rd August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/ Ravinder.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Ravinder Kumar S/O Sh. Lok Nath
(Card No. 068, LTV Driver) Village- Powari, P.O. & Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The
General Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project,
Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the
report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal
and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all
efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the
said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the
industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld.
Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal
adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Ravinder Kumar S/O Sh. Lok Nath (Card No. 068,
LTV Driver) Village- Powari, P.O. & Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General
Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project,
Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 18-3-2016, allegedly without
complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If
not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
10584
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 1th August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/ Sameer.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Sameer Chand S/O Sh. Deva Singh,
R/O Village & P.O. Khawangi, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The General Manager, M/s
Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa,
Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the
report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal
and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all
efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the
said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the
industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld.
Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal
adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Sameer Chand S/O Sh. Deva Singh, R/O Village &
P.O. Khawangi, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General Manager, M/s Patel
Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong Peo, Tehsil
Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 26-3-2016, allegedly without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of
back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above employer/ management?
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 23rd August, 2017
No.: 11-1/95(Lab) ID/2017/Kinnaur/Shakti Kumar.—It appears to the undersigned that
an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Shakti Kumar S/O Sh. Bhagwan
10585
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
Singh, R/O Village Powari, P.O. Shongtong, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. Vs The General
Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project, Reckong
Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the
report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal
and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all
efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the
said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the
industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated- 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld.
Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal
adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Sh. Shakti Kumar S/O Sh. Bhagwan Singh, R/O
Village Powari, P.O. Shongtong, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, H.P. by the General
Manager, M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. Shongthong- Karchham Hydro Electric Project,
Reckong Peo, Tehsil Kalpa, Distt. Kinnaur, (H.P.) w.e.f. 18-3-2016, allegedly without
complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If
not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 31st August, 2017
No.: 11-1/85(Lab)ID/2017/Kangra/Bansi Lal.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute exists between Shri Bansi Lal S/O Shri Duni Chand, R/O V.P.O. Chahri, Tehsil
Nagrota Bagwan, District Kangra, H.P. and (13) other workmen (list enclosed) and (i) the Director
of Horticulture, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-2 (ii) the Deputy Director of Horticulture, Dharamshala,
District Kangra, H.P. (iii) the Fruit Technologist, H.P. Fruit Canning Unit, Nagrota Bagwan,
District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of miscellaneous demands.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
10586
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether the demands raised by Shri Bansi Lal S/O Shri Duni Chand, R/O V.P.O. Chahri,
Tehsil Nagrota Bagwan, District Kangra, H.P. and (13) other workmen (list enclosed) vide
demand notice dated 21-09-2015 (copy enclosed) before (i) the Director of Horticulture,
Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-2 (ii) the Deputy Director of Horticulture, Dharamshala, District
Kangra, H.P. (iii) the Fruit Technologist, H.P. Fruit Canning Unit, Nagrota Bagwan, District
Kangra, H.P. is tenable, legal and justified? If yes, what relief of service benefits the
aggrieved workmen are entitled to as per demand notice? If not, what are its legal effects?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 21st August, 2017
No.: 11-1/85(Lab)ID/2012/Kangra/ Dhian Chand.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute exists between Shri Dhian Chand S/O Shri Dharam Chand, R/O Village Kuthar
Thati, P.O. Sansai, Tehsil and District Kangra, H.P. and (i) the Deputy Commissioner-cum-
Chairman, District Red Cross Society Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Secretary, Red Cross Society,
Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of changing his service conditions.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under subm section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether the services rendered by Shri Dhian Chand S/O Shri Dharam Chand, R/O Village
Kuthar Thati, P.O. Sansai, Tehsil and District Kangra, H.P. as Lab Technician w.e.f. 04-01-
2003 to November, 2003 and subsequently changing his service conditions i.e. designation
from Lab Technician to Assistant Lab Technician w.e.f. December, 2003, without following
10587
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, to what
extent relief, service benefits and compensation the workman is entitled to from the above
employers i.e. (i) the Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Red Cross Society
Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Secretary, Red Cross Society, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P.?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 08th August, 2017
No.: 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2017/Una/ Parvinder Singh.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute exists between Shri Parvinder Singh & 8 other housekeeping workers C/O Datta
Property Dealer, Near HRTC Workshop, District Una, H.P. and (i) the Employer M/S Nestle India,
Industrial Area Tahliwal, District Una, H.P. (Principal Employer) (ii) the Employer, M/S
Impressions Services Private Limited, Regd. Office WZ-8/7 (F.F.), Kirti Nagar, Industrial Area,
New Delhi (Contractor) on the issue of demand regarding annual increment vide demand notice
dated 21-03-2016.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether the demandno. 1 & 2 regarding annual increment raised vide demand notice dated
21-03-2016 (copy enclosed) by Shri Parvinder Singh & 8 other housekeeping workers C/O
Datta Property Dealer, Near HRTC Workshop, District Una, H.P. to be fulfilled by (i) the
Employer M/S Nestle India, Industrial Area Tahliwal, District Una, H.P. (Principal
Employer) (ii) the Employer, M/S Impressions Services Private Limited, Regd. Office WZ-
8/7 (F.F.), Kirti Nagar, Industrial Area, New Delhi (Contractor) are legal, justified and
maintainable? If yes, what relief and benefits the above workers are entitled to by the above
employers?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner.
10588
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 31st August, 2017
No.: 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2017/Una/Surinder Kumar.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute exists between Shri Surinder Kumar S/O Shri Om Prakash, R/O Village Bangarh,
P.O. Jakhera, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. and the Manager, M/S Rangar Breweries Limited,
Industrial Area Mehatpur, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his
services during 21-03-2016.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the
Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but
could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power
vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this
dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal
Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as
per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of
1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala,
constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
“Whether termination of the services of Shri Surinder Kumar S/O Shri Om Prakash, R/O
Village Bangarh, P.O. Jakhera, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. by the Manager, M/S Rangar
Breweries Limited, Industrial Area Mehatpur, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. during
21-03- 2016 on the basis of domestic enquiry and without affording adequate/sufficient
opportunities in the domestic enquiry, without complying with the provisions of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,
seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the
above employer/management?”
By order,
Sd/-
Deputy Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 22nd September, 2017
No-Shram (E) 7-01/2017-Misc.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 33B of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 the Governor Himachal Pradesh is pleased to transfer of the
proceedings in reference no. 08/2017 titled as Jagdish Kumar V/S Sunil Malik, Director Kufri Fun
World from Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court Shimla to Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour
Court D/Shala under section 33-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
By order,
Sd/-
Pr. Secretary (Lab. & Emp.).
10589
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 13th September, 2017
Whears, Shri Prem Dass Kaundal S/o Shri Kirpa Ram R/o VPO Serathana, Tehsil Nagrota
Bagwan, District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh had filed a claim application dated 02-01-2017 against
the management of M/s Diviya Himachal Prakashan Pvt. Ltd., Kangra-Pathankot Road, Old
Matour, Tehsil & District Kangra under Working Journalist and Other Employees (Conditions of
Service) and Miscellaneous Peovisions Act, 1955 (45 of 1955). he claimed that he worked with the
management from 26-03-2012 to 23-11-2015 as security guard Claimant demanded dues of Rs.
10,61,982/- under the Majithia Wage Board from the management above named Claimant filed this
application u/s 17(1) of the ibid Act for recovery of the above said amount as arrear of land
revenue.
And whereas, after issuance of notice, management field its reply and affidavit, thereby
denied all the allegations made by the claimant/applicant. Management denied paying any kind of
dues to the claimant. It also denied the employer-employee relationship between the management
and claimant. It hence, challenged the claim filed under the ibid Act being not maintainable.
And whereas, claim and counter claims of both the parties were scrutinized at length by this
'authority' and came to the conclusion that amount in question is not a settled claim and recovery
proceedings cannot be intiated as per the provisions of section 17(1) of the Act. Thus, question of
payment of above said amount is required to be adjudicated by Labour Court as per the provisions
of Section 17(2) of the Act.
Therefore, in view of the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (a) 4-17/11- L, Dated 18-10-2016
and as per power vested under Sub Section-2 of Section-17 of the Working Journalist and Other
Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 (45 of 1955), the
question as to above said amount due to the claimant under this Act is referred to the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of the Industrial Disputes Act
1947 (14 of 1947) with the following terms of reference for adjudication :—
1.
"Whether employer-employee relationship existed between the applicant/claimant and
management ever?" if yes.
2.
"Whether applicant/claimant is entitled to the amount of Rs. 10,61,982/- as claimed by
him from the management/respondent the Majithia Wage Board?"
By order,
Sd/-
Labour Officer,
Kangra Zone at Dharamshala, H.P.
10590
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 13th September, 2017
Whears, Shri Manoj Kumar S/o Shri Pritam Chand R/o Village Barai, PO Suned, Tehsil
Nagrota Bagwan, District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh had filed a claim application dated
16-01-2017 against the management of M/s Amar Ujala Publications Ltd., Plot No. 22-23 Industrial
Area Nagorota Bagwan, Tehsil Nagorota Bagwan, District Kangra under Working Journalist and
Other Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Peovisions Act, 1955 (45 of 1955).
He claimed that he was appointed as electrician with the management on 209-11-2012 Claimant
demanded dues of Rs. 17,02,779/- under the Majithia Wage Board from the management above
named Claimant filed this application u/s 17(1) of the ibid Act for recovery of the above said
amount as arrear of land revenue.
And whereas, after issuance of notice, Management denied all the allegations, averments
and assertions made by the claimant. Management challenged the locus standi to file the present
claim by the claimant u/s 17(1) of the Act on the ground that no employer-employee relationship
ever exsted between the management and claimant at any point of time. Management stated that he
was the employee of their contractor Management also agitated the present claim being the abus of
process of law Management thus, stated that it is not liable to pay any dues to the claimant under
the Majithia Wage Board.
And wheras, claims and counter claims of both the parties were scrutinzed at length by this
authority and came to the conclusion that amount in question is not a settled claim and recovery
proceedings cannot be initiated as per the procisions of 17(1) of the Act of the Act. Thus, question
of payment of above said amount is required to be adjudicated by Labour Court as per the
provisions of Section 17(2) of the Act.
Therefore, in view of the above, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (a) 4-17/11- L, Dated 18-10-2016
and as per power vested under Sub Section-2 of Section-17 of the Working Journalist and Other
Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 (45 of 1955), the
question as to above said amount due to the claimant under this Act is referred to the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of the Industrial Disputes Act
1947 (14 of 1947) with the following terms of reference for adjudication :—
1.
"Whether employer-employee relationship existed between the applicant/claimant and
management ever?" if yes.
2.
"Whether applicant/claimant is entitled to the amount of Rs. 17,02,779/- as claimed by
him from the management/respondent the Majithia Wage Board?"
By order,
Sd/-
Labour Officer,
Kangra Zone at Dharamshala, H.P.
10591
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 13th September, 2017
Whears, Shri Suresh Kumar S/o Shri Amar Nath R/o VPO Jalot, Tehsil Nagrota Bagwan,
District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh had filed a claim application dated 16-01-2017 against the
management of M/s Amar Ujala Publications Ltd., Plot No. 22-23 Industrial Area Nagorota
Bagwan, Tehsil Nagorota Bagwan, District Kangra under Working Journalist and Other Employees
(Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Peovisions Act, 1955 (45 of 1955). He claimed that he
was appointed as electrician with the management on 09-11-2012 Claimant demanded dues of Rs.
17,02,779/- under the Majithia Wage Board from the management above named Claimant filed this
application u/s 17(1) of the ibid Act for recovery of the above said amount as arrear of land
revenue.
And whereas, after issuance of notice, management field its reply. Management denied all
the allegations, averments and assertions made by the claimant. Management challenged the locus
standi to file the present claim by the claimant u/s 17(1) of the Act on the ground that no employer-
employee relationship ever exsted between the management and claimant at any point of time.
Management stated that he was the employee of their contractor Management also agitated the
present claim being the abus of process of law Management thus, stated that it is not liable to pay
any dues to the claimant under the Majithia Wage Board.
And wheras, claims and counter claims of both the parties were scrutinzed at length by this
authority and came to the conclusion that amount in question is not a settled claim and recovery
proceedings cannot be initiated as per the procisions of 17(1) of the Act of the Act. Thus, question
of payment of above said amount is required to be adjudicated by Labour Court as per the
provisions of Section 17(2) of the Act.
Therefore, in view of the above, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the
Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (a) 4-17/11- L, Dated 18-10-2016
and as per power vested under Sub Section-2 of Section-17 of the Working Journalist and Other
Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 (45 of 1955), the
question as to above said amount due to the claimant under this Act is referred to the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of the Industrial Disputes Act
1947 (14 of 1947) with the following terms of reference for adjudication :—
1.
"Whether employer-employee relationship existed between the applicant/claimant and
management ever?" if yes.
2.
"Whether applicant/claimant is entitled to the amount of Rs. 17,02,779/- as claimed by
him from the management/respondent the Majithia Wage Board?"
By order,
Sd/-
Labour Officer,
Kangra Zone at Dharamshala, H.P.
10592
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
[Authoritative English Text of this Department Notification No. EXN-F(10)-6/2018 dated
12/02/2018 required under clause(3) of Article 348 of the Constitution of India.]
EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT
CORRIGENDUM
Shimla-2, the 12th February, 2018
No.EXN-F(10)-6/2018.—In the Notification No. 6/2018-State Tax (Rate) dated 24th Jan.,
2018 published in the Gazette of Himachal Pradesh, Ordinary, vide No. EXN-F(10)-6/2018, dated
24th January, 2018,.—
(i) at page 10132, in serial No.(B) (i), for the word "substituted" read "inserted"
(ii) at page 10132, in serial No. (B) (ii), for word "substituted" read "inserted"
By order,
JAGDISH CHANDER SHARMA,
Principal Secretary (E&T).
_____________
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 15th February, 2018
No.Fin-2-C-(12)-3/2017.—Government of Himachal Pradesh hereby notifies the sale of
Himachal Pradesh Government Stock (securities) of 10-year tenure for an aggregate amount of `
500.00 crore (Nominal). The sale will be subject to the terms and conditions spelt out in this
notification (called Specific Notification) as also the terms and conditions specified in the General
Notification No.Fin-2-C(12)-11/2003 dated July 20, 2007 of Government of Himachal Pradesh.
Object of the loan
1.
(i) The proceeds of the State Government Securities will be utilized for the
development programme of the Government of Himachal Pradesh.
(ii) Consent of Central Government has been obtained to the floatation of this loan as
required by Article 293 (3) of the Constitution of India.
Method of Issue
2.
Government Stock will be sold through the Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai Office
(PDO) Fort, Mumbai-400 001 by auction in the manner as prescribed in paragraph 6.1 of the
General Notification No.Fin-2-C(12)-11/2003, dated July 20, 2007 at a coupon rate to be
determined by the Reserve Bank of India at the yield based auction under multiple price formats.
Allotment to Non-Competitive Bidders
3.
The Government Stock upto 10% of the notified amount of the sale will be allotted to
eligible individuals and institutions subject to a maximum limit of 1% of the notified amount for a
10593
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
single bid as per the Revised Scheme for Non-Competitive Bidding Facility in the Auctions of
State Government Securities of the General Notification (Annexure-II).
Place and Date of Auction
4.
The auction will be conducted by the Reserve Bank of India, at its Mumbai Office,
Fort, Mumbai-400 001 on February 20, 2018. Bids for the auction should be submitted in
electronic format on the Reserve Bank of India Core Banking Solution (E-Kuber) System as stated
below on February 20, 2018.
(a) The competitive bids shall be submitted electronically on the Reserve Bank of India
Core Banking Solution (E-Kuber) System between 10:30AM and 12:00 PM.
(b) The non-competitive bids shall be submitted electronically on the Reserve Bank of
India Core Banking Solution (E-Kuber) System between 10:30 AM and 11:30 AM.
Result of the Auction
5.
The result of the auction shall be displayed by the Reserve Bank of India on its website
on the same day. The payment by successful bidders will be on February 21, 2018.
Method of Payment
6.
Successful bidders will make payments on February 21, 2018 before close of banking
hours by means of cash, bankers’ cheque/pay order, demand draft payable at Reserve Bank of India
Mumbai/New Delhi or a cheque drawn on their account with Reserve Bank of India,
Mumbai(Fort)/New Delhi.
Tenure
7.
The Stock will be of 10-year tenure. The tenure of the Stock will commence on
February 21, 2018.
Date of Repayment
8.
The loan will be repaid at par on February 21, 2028.
Rate of Interest
9.
The cut-off yield determined at the auction will be the coupon rate percent per annum
on the Stock sold at the auction. The interest will be paid on August 21 and February 21.
Eligibility of Securities
10. The investment in Government Stock will be reckoned as an eligible investment in
Government Securities by banks for the purpose of Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR) under Section
24 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The stocks will qualify for the ready forward facility.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Himachal Pradesh
Addl. Chief Secretary to the Government of Himachal Pradesh
Finance Department.
10594
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
c vnkyr rglhynkj ,oa dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh] rglhy /keZ'kkyk] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0
Jherh Anita Kumari
cuke
vke turk
fo"k;-&&izkFkZuk&i= tsjs /kkjk 13¼3½ fgekpy izns'k iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969-
uksfVl cuke vke turkA
Jherh Anita Kumari iq=h@iRuh Jh] Pritam Chand, fuoklh Garoh, rglhy /keZ'kkyk] ftyk
dkaxM+k us bl vnkyr esa 'kiFk&i= lfgr eqdÌek nk;j fd;k gS fd mlds iq= dk uke Sahil Thakur
dk tUe fnukad 03&12&1995 gS ijUrq ,e0lh0@xzke iapk;r Garoh esa tUe iathd`r u gSA vr% bls
iathd`r fd;s tkus ds vkns'k fn;s tk;saA bl uksfVl ds }kjk leLr turk dks rFkk lEcfU/kr lEcfU/k;ksa
dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh dks mijksDr cPps Sahil Thakur dk tUe iathd`r fd;s tkus ckjs
dksbZ ,rjkt gks rks og viuk ,rjkt gekjh vnkyr esa fnukad 17&02&2018 dks vlkyru ;k odkyru
gkftj vkdj is'k dj ldrk gS vU;Fkk eqrkfcd 'kiFk&i= tUe frfFk iathd`r fd;s tkus ckjs vkns'k
ikfjr dj fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 19&01&2018 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh fd;k x;kA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]
/keZ'kkyk] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0iz0A
&&&&&&&&&&&&&
c vnkyr rglhynkj ,oa dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh] rglhy /keZ'kkyk] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0
Jherh Shyam Lata
cuke
vke turk
fo"k;-&&izkFkZuk&i= tsjs /kkjk 13¼3½ fgekpy izns'k iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969-
uksfVl cuke vke turkA
Jherh Shyam Lata iRuh Jh] Parshottam Kumar, fuoklh Dari, rglhy /keZ'kkyk] ftyk dkaxM+k
us bl vnkyr esa 'kiFk&i= lfgr eqdÌek nk;j fd;k gS fd mlds iq= dk uke Shagun dk tUe
fnukad 15&09&2010 gS ijUrq ,e0lh0@xzke iapk;r Dharamshala esa tUe iathd`r u gSA vr% bls
iathd`r fd;s tkus ds vkns'k fn;s tk;saA bl uksfVl ds }kjk leLr turk dks rFkk lEcfU/kr lEcfU/k;ksa
dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh dks mijksDr cPps Shagun dk tUe iathd`r fd;s tkus ckjs dksbZ
,rjkt gks rks og viuk ,rjkt gekjh vnkyr esa fnukad 17&02&2018 dks vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj
vkdj is'k dj ldrk gS vU;Fkk eqrkfcd 'kiFk&i= tUe frfFk iathd`r fd;s tkus ckjs vkns'k ikfjr dj
fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 19&01&2018 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh fd;k x;kA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]
/keZ'kkyk] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0iz0A
10595
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
c vnkyr rglhynkj ,oa dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh] rglhy /keZ'kkyk] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0
Jh Pappu
cuke
vke turk
fo"k;-&&izkFkZuk&i= tsjs /kkjk 13¼3½ fgekpy izns'k iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969-
uksfVl cuke vke turk
Jh Pappu iq= Jh Madho Ram, fuoklh Kandrehad, rglhy /keZ'kkyk] ftyk dkaxM+k us bl
vnkyr esa 'kiFk&i= lfgr eqdÌek nk;j fd;k gS fd mlds iq= dk uke Pappu dk tUe fnukad
05&06&2010 gS ijUrq ,e0lh0@xzke iapk;r Kandrehad esa tUe iathd`r u gSA vr% bls iathd`r fd;s
tkus ds vkns'k fn;s tk;saA bl uksfVl ds }kjk leLr turk dks rFkk lEcfU/kr lEcfU/k;ksa dks lwfpr fd;k
tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh dks mijksDr cPps Pappu dk tUe iathd`r fd;s tkus ckjs dksbZ ,rjkt gks rks og
viuk ,rjkt gekjh vnkyr esa fnukad 17&02&2018 dks vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj vkdj is'k dj
ldrk gS vU;Fkk eqrkfcd 'kiFk&i= tUe frfFk iathd`r fd;s tkus ckjs vkns'k ikfjr dj fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 05&01&2018 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh fd;k x;kA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]
/keZ'kkyk] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0iz0A
&&&&&&&&&&&&&
In the Court of Executive Magistrate Dharamshala, Tehsil Dharamshala,
District Kangra, H.P.
1.
Shri Chaman Lal s/o Sh. Raghbir Singh, r/o Kaned, Tehsil Dharamshala, District
Kangra.
2.
Smt. Mamta Devi d/o Sh. Hem Raj, r/o Rajiana, Tehsil Nagrota Bhagwan, District
Kangra.
Versus
1.
The General Public
2.
Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Dharamshala.
Whereas the above named applicants have made an application under section 8(4) of the
H.P. Registration of Marriages Act, 1996 alongwith an affidavit stating therein that they have
solemnized their marriage on 15-01-2017 but has not been found entered in the records of the
Registrar of Marriages i. e. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Dharamshala.
And whereas, they have also stated that they were not aware of the laws of the registration
of marriage with the Registrar of Marriages and now, therefore necessary orders for the registration
of their marriage be passed so that their marriage is registered by the concerned authority.
Now, therefore, objections are invited from the general public that if anyone has any
objection regarding the registration of the marriage of the above named applicants, then they should
10596
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
appear before the court of undersigned on 17-02-2018 at Tehsil Office Dharamshala at 10.00 A.M.
either personally or through their authorized agent.
In the event of their failure to do so orders shall be passed ex-parte against the respondents
for the registration of marriage without affording any further opportunity of being heard.
Issued under my hand and seal of the court on this__________
Seal.
Sd/-
Executive Magistrate,
Tehsil Dharamshala, Distt. Kangra.
___________
c vnkyr Jh y{e.k flg] dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh Fkqjy] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0
eqdíek ua0 % 2018
rkjh[k is'kh % 26&02&2018
fdLe izdj.k % tUe iathdj.kA
Jh #eh jke iq= d`".k pUn] fuoklh xkao uysgM] Mkd?kj o mi&rglhy Fkqjy] xzke iapk;r
Fkqjy] ftyk dkaxM+k ¼fg0 iz0½
- -izkFkhZA
cuke
vke turk
- - izfroknhA
fo"k;-&&tUe o e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969 dh /kkjk 13¼3½ ds rgr tUe iathdj.k gsrq izkFkZuk&i=A
izkFkhZ Jh #eh jke iq= Jh d`".k pUn] fuoklh xkao uysgM] Mkd?kj o mi&rglhy Fkqjy] xzke
iapk;r Fkqjy] ftyk dkaxM+k ¼fg0 iz0½ bl vnkyr esa izkFkZuk&i= e; O;ku gYQh is'k djrs gq, vkosnu
fd;k gS fd mlds iq= lafpr dqekj dk tUe fnukad 09&09&2004 dks xkao uysgM] Mkd?kj o
mi&rglhy xzke iapk;r Fkqjy esa gqvk gSA ijUrq vKkurko'k mlds tUe dk iathdj.k LFkkuh; xzke
iapk;r vfHkys[k esa u djok;k x;k gSA vr% izkFkhZ bl U;k;ky; ds ek/;e ls vius iq= ds tUe iathdj.k
djus dk vkns'k xzke iapk;r Fkqjy dks tkjh djokuk pkgrk gSA
vr% izkFkhZ dk vkosnu Lohdkj djrs gq, bl b'rgkj eqL=h equknh }kjk vke turk dks lwfpr
fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh O;fDr ;k laLFkk dks mijksDr lafpr dqekj dh tUe frfFk 09&09&2004 ds
iathdj.k ckjs dksbZ mtj ,oa ,rjkt gks rks og vlkyru ;k odkyru rkjh[k is'kh 26&02&2018 dks
gkftj vnkyr gksdj mtj o ,rjkt is'k dj ldrk gS ckn rkjh[k is'kh fdlh fdLe dk mtj ,oa
,rjkt ugha lquk tkosxk o mijksDr lafpr dqekj iq= #eh jke dh tUe frfFk dks iathdj.k djus dk
vkns'k mi&LFkkuh; iathdkj tUe o e`R;q xzke iapk;r] Fkqjy dks ikfjr dj fn;k tk,xkA
;g b'rgkj esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls vkt fnukad 20&01&2018 tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh Fkqjy]
ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0A
10597
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
c vnkyr Jh y{e.k flg] uk;c rglhynkj ,oa dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh Fkqjy] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0
eqdíek ua0 % 2018
rkjh[k is'kh % 26&02&2018
Jherh papyk nsoh iRuh Lo0 Jh izdk'k pUn] xkao ?kjFkaw] Mkd?kj dkSuk] mi&rglhy Fkqjy] xzke
iapk;r dkSuk] ftyk dkaxM+k ¼fg0 iz0½
- -izkfFkZuA
cuke
vke turk
- - izfroknhA
fo"k;-&&tUe o e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969 dh /kkjk 13¼3½ ds rgr tUe iathdj.k gsrq izkFkZuk&i=A
Jherh papyk nsoh iRuh Lo0 Jh izdk'k pUn] xkao ?kjFkaw] Mkd?kj dkSuk] mi&rglhy Fkqjy] xzke
iapk;r dkSuk] ftyk dkaxM+k ¼fg0 iz0½ us bl vnkyr esa izkFkZuk&i= e; O;ku gYQh is'k djrs gq, vkosnu
fd;k gS fd mlds ifr izdk'k pUn iq= Lo0 Jh es?k flag dk nsgkUr fnukad 20&09&1986 dks xkao ?kjFkaw]
xzke iapk;r dkSuk esa gqvk gSA ijUrq vKkurko'k mlds e`R;q dk iathdj.k xzke iapk;r vfHkys[k esa u
djok;k x;k gSA vr% izkfFkZ;k bl U;k;ky; ds ek/;e ls vius irh Lo0 izdk'k pUn iq= Lo0 Jh es?k
flag dh e`R;q dk iathdj.k djus dk vkns'k xzke iapk;r dkSuk dks tkjh djokuk pkgrh gSA
vr% izkfFkZ;k dk vkosnu Lohdkj djrs gq, bl b'rgkj eqL=h equknh o pLikaxh }kjk vke turk
dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh O;fDr ;k laLFkk dks mDr izdk'k pUn iq= Lo0 Jh es?k flag dk
nsgkar fnukad 20&09&1986 ds iathdj.k ckjs dksbZ mtj ,oa ,rjkt gks rks og vlkyru ;k odkyru
rkjh[k is'kh 26&02&2018 dks gkftj vnkyr gksdj mtj o ,rjkt is'k dj ldrk gS ckn rkjh[k is'kh
fdlh fdLe dk mtj ,oa ,rjkt ugha lquk tkosxk o mijksDr Lo0 izdk'k pUn iq= Lo0 Jh es?k flag dh
e`R;q dk iathdj.k djus dk vkns'k mi&LFkkuh; iathdkj tUe o e`R;q xzke iapk;r] dkSuk dks ikfjr dj
fn;k tk,xkA
;g b'rgkj vkt esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls fnukad 20&01&2018 tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh Fkqjy]
ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&
c vnkyr rglhynkj ,oa dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh] rglhy /keZ'kkyk] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0
Jh Sukman Gale
cuke
vke turk
fo"k;-&&izkFkZuk&i= tsjs /kkjk 13¼3½ fgekpy izns'k iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969-
uksfVl cuke vke turk %
Jh Sukman Gale iq= Jh Sekha Gale] fuoklh Slate Godam, rglhy /keZ'kkyk] ftyk dkaxM+k us
bl vnkyr esa 'kiFk&i= lfgr eqdÌek nk;j fd;k gS fd mldh iq=h Meena dk tUe fnukad
15&06&1975 dks gqvk gS ijUrq ,e0lh0@xzke iapk;r Yol Cantt. esa tUe iathd`r u gS vr% bls iathd`r
fd;s tkus ds vkns'k fn;s tk;saA bl uksfVl ds }kjk leLr turk dks rFkk lEcfU/kr lEcfU/k;ksa dks lwfpr
fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh dks mijksDr cPps Meena dk tUe iathd`r fd;s tkus ckjs dksbZ ,rjkt gks
10598
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
rks og viuk ,rjkt gekjh vnkyr esa fnukad 22&02&2018 dks vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj vkdj
viuk ,rjkt is'k dj ldrk gS vU;Fkk eqrkfcd 'kiFk&i= tUe frfFk iathd`r fd;s tkus ckjs vkns'k
ikfjr dj fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 01&02&2018 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh fd;k x;kA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]
/keZ'kkyk] ftyk dkaxM+kA
&&&&&&&&&&&&&
c vnkyr uk;c rglhynkj ,oa dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdjh] rglhy [kqf.M;ka]
ftyk dkaxM+k ¼fg0 iz0½
dsl ua0 % 2018/Misc.
rkjh[k is'kh % 26&2&2018
1- Jh izse flag iq= Jh csyh jke] fuoklh xkao ryh] Mkd?kj yxMw] rglhy [kqf.M;ka] ftyk
dkaxM+k ¼fg0 iz0½A
cuke
vke turk
muoku eqdíek-&&tsjs /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969 ds rgr e`R;q frfFk iathdj.kA
uksfVl cuke vke turk %
izkFkhZ Jh izse flag iq= Jh csyh jke] fuoklh xkao ryh] Mkd?kj yxMw] rglhy [kqf.M;ka] ftyk
dkaxM+k ¼fg0 iz0½ us Lo;a mifLFkr gksdj izkFkZuk&i= izLrqr fd;k fd mldh ekrk Lo0 Jherh lR;k nsoh
dh e`R;q fnukad 18&03&2015 dks xkao ryh] Mkd?kj yxMw esa gqbZ FkhA ijUrq iathdj.k dkuwu dh
tkudkjh u gksus ds dkj.k xzke iapk;r yxMw rglhy [kqf.M;ka ds vfHkys[k esa ntZ u gks ldh gSA vr%
e`R;q frfFk dk iathdj.k xzke iapk;r yxMw] rglhy [kqf.M;ka ds vfHkys[k esa ntZ fd;k tk;sA
vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks lquokbZ gsrq ctfj;s b'rgkj o eqL=h equknh }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd
bl lEcU/k esa fdlh izdkj dk mtj@,rjkt gks rks og fnukad 26&02&2018 dks vlkyru o odkyru
is'k gksdj viuk ,rjkt ntZ djok ldrk gSA mlds mijkUr dksbZ Hkh mtj@,rjkt tsjs lek;r u gksxk
rFkk Jherh lR;k nsoh iRuh Lo0 Jh csyh jke] fuoklh xkao ryh] Mkd?kj yxMw dh e`R;q frfFk dk
iathdj.k fnukad 18&03&2015 tsjs /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969 ds rgr xzke
iapk;r yxMw ds vfHkys[k esa ntZ djus ds vkns'k ikfjr dj fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 27&01&2018 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
uk;c rglhynkj ,oa dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]
rglhy [kqf.M;ka] ftyk dkaxM+k ¼fg0 iz0½A
10599
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
c vnkyr tukc lgk;d lekgrkZ] f}rh; Js.kh ,oa uk;c rglhynkj pf<+;kj]
ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0
eqdíek la[;k % 11/NT/2017
rkjh[k nk;jk % 11&10&2017
Jherh lR;k nsoh iRuh Lo0 Jh vthr flag iq= Jh lqer flag] fuoklh egky jk[k] Mkd?kj
flEcy] mi&rglhy pf<+;kj] ftyk dkaxM+k ¼fg0 iz0½
- - izkfFkZ;kA
cuke
vke turk
- - izR;kFkhZ
Jherh lR;k nsoh iRuh Lo0 Jh vthr flag iq= Jh lqer flag] fuoklh egky jk[k] Mkd?kj
flEcy] mi&rglhy pf<+;kj] ftyk dkaxM+k ¼fg0 iz0½ bl dk;kZy;@U;k;ky; esa izkFkZuk&i= is'k fd;k gS
fd mlds Lo0 ifr o llqj dk uke vk/kkj dkMZ] iapk;r fjdkMZ] lfoZl dkMZ o e`R;q izek.k&i= esa lgh
uke Jh vthr flag iq= Lo0 Jh lqfer flag ntZ gS ijUrq jktLo vfHkys[k egky flEcy esa bUrdky
rLnhd djrs le; esjs ifr o llqj dk uke thrk iq= eulk jke ntZ gS tks fd xyr gSA vkosfndk
vius Lo0 ifr o llqj dk uke jktLo vfHkys[k egky flEcy] mi&rglhy pf<+;kj] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0
iz0 esa Jh vftr flag iq= lqfer flag ntZ djokuk pkgrh gSA
vr% vke turk dks bl jkti= fg0 iz0 esa izdkf'kr b'rgkj ds ek/;e ls lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS
fd bl ckjs fdlh dks dksbZ mtj o ,rjkt gks rks og fnukad 16&02&2018 dks v/kksgLrk{kjh dh vnkyr
esa vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj gksdj viuk i{k j[k ldrs gSaA xSj gkftjh dh lwjr esa ,d rjQk
dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ tkosxhA
vkt fnukad 16&01&2018 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh]
pf<+;kj] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&
c vnkyr tukc lgk;d lekgrkZ] f}rh; Js.kh ,oa uk;c rglhynkj pf<+;kj]
ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0
eqdíek la[;k % 12/NT/2017
rkjh[k nk;jk % 20&11&2017
Jh jktw iq= Jh 'kadj nkl] fuoklh xkao lysgjk] Mkd?kj lysgjk] mi&rglhy pf<+;kj] ftyk
dkaxM+k ¼fg0 iz0½
- - izkFkhZA
cuke
vke turk
- - izR;kFkhZ
Jh jktw iq= Jh 'kadj nkl] fuoklh xkao o egky lysgjk] Mkd?kj lysgjk] mi&rglhy pf<+;kj]
ftyk dkaxM+k ¼fg0 iz0½ us bl dk;kZy;@U;k;ky; esa izkFkZuk&i= is'k fd;k gS rFkk mys[k fd;k gS fd
mldk uke vk/kkj dkMZ] ifjokj jftLVj i= esa lgh uke jktw ntZ gS ijUrq jktLo vfHkys[k egky
10600
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
lysgjk esa esjk uke jktdqekj iq= 'kadj nkl ntZ gS tks fd xyr gSA vkosnd viuk uke jktLo vfHkys[k
egky lysgjk esa lgh uke jktw iq= Jh 'kadj nkl] fuoklh xkao o Mkd?kj lysgjk] mi&rglhy pf<+;kj]
ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0 esa ntZ djokuk pkgrk gSA
vr% vke turk dks bl jkti= b'rgkj izdkf'kr ds ek/;e ls lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl ckjs
fdlh dks dksbZ mtj o ,rjkt gks rks og fnukad 16&02&2018 dks v/kksgLrk{kjh dh vnkyr esa vlkyru
;k odkyru gkftj gksdj viuk i{k j[k ldrs gSaA xSj gkftjh dh lwjr esa ,d rjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa
ykbZ tkosxhA
vkt fnukad 16&01&2018 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh]
pf<+;kj] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&
c vnkyr tukc lgk;d lekgrkZ] f}rh; Js.kh ,oa uk;c rglhynkj pf<+;kj]
ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0
eqdíek la[;k % 13/NT/2017
Jh jkftUnz dqekj iq= Jh lhrq jke] fuoklh xkao o Mkd?kj nzqx] mi&rglhy pf<+;kj] ftyk
dkaxM+k ¼fg0 iz0½
- - izkFkhZA
cuke
vke turk
- - izR;kFkhZ
Jh jkftUnz dqekj iq= Jh lhrq jke] fuoklh xkao o Mkd?kj nzqx] mi&rglhy pf<+;kj] ftyk
dkaxM+k ¼fg0 iz0½ us bl dk;kZy;@U;k;ky; esa izkFkZuk&i= is'k djds rFkk mys[k fd;k gS fd mldk uke
vk/kkj dkMZ] ifjokj jftLVj] igpku&i= esa lgh uke jkftUnz dqekj ntZ gS ijUrq jktLo vfHkys[k egky
nzqx esa esjk uke jktw iq= lhrq ntZ gS tks fd xyr gSA vkosnd viuk uke jktLo vfHkys[k egky nzqx esa
lgh uke jkftUnz iq= Jh flrq] fuoklh xkao o Mkd?kj nzqx] mi&rglhy pf<+;kj] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0
esa ntZ djokuk pkgrk gSA
vr% vke turk dks bl jkti= b'rgkj izdkf'kr ds ek/;e ls lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl ckjs
fdlh dks dksbZ mtj o ,rjkt gks rks og fnukad 16&02&2018 dks v/kksgLrk{kjh dh vnkyr esa vlkyru
;k odkyru gkftj gksdj viuk i{k j[k ldrs gSaA xSj gkftjh dh lwjr esa ,d rjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa
ykbZ tkosxhA
vkt fnukad 16&01&2018 dks gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh]
pf<+;kj] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0A
10601
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
In the Court of Shri Sunny Sharma, H.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional
Magistrate, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P.
In the matter of :
1.
Tashi Dawa Barongpa s/o Late Shri Sonam Barongpa, resident of H.No. 366, Bala
Behar Post Office Dhalpur, Tehsil & Distt. Kullu, ( H.P.)
2.
Babita d/o Late Shri Dorje Angrup, resident of Village Mahili, Post Office Naggar,
Tehsil & District Kullu, H.P.
. . Applicants.
Versus
General Public
Subject.—Proclamation for the registration of Marriage under section 16 of Special Marriage Act,
1954.
Tashi Barongpa and Babita have filed an application alongwith affidavits in the court of
undersigned under section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have solemnized their
marriage on 23-10-2017 and they are living as husband and wife since then, hence their marriage
may be registered under Act, ibid.
Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who
has any objection regarding this marriage can file the objection personally or writing before this
court on or before 18-02-2018. The objection received after 18-02-2018 will not be entertained and
marriage will be registered accordingly.
Issued today on 18-01-2018 under my hand and seal of the court.
Seal.
SUNNY SHARMA (HAS),
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate,
Kullu, District Kullu, H.P.
____________
In the Court of Shri Sunny Sharma, H.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional
Magistrate, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P.
In the matter of :
1.
Manoj Kumar s/o Shri Bahadur Singh, resident of Village & Post Office Mohal, Tehsil
Bhunter, District Kullu, H.P.
2. Anjali d/o Sh. Rajender Kumar, resident of Village Deodhar, Post Office Neoli, Tehsil
& District Kullu, H.P.
. . Applicants.
Versus
General Public
Subject.—Proclamation for the registration of Marriage under section 16 of Special Marriage Act,
1954.
10602
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
Manoj Kumar and Anjali have filed an application alongwith affidavits in the court of
undersigned under section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have solemnized their
marriage on 25-09-2017 and they are living as husband and wife since then, hence their marriage
may be registered under Act, ibid.
Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who
has any objection regarding this marriage can file the objection personally or writing before this
court on or before 18-02-2018. The objection received after 18-02-2018 will not be entertained and
marriage will be registered accordingly.
Issued today on 18-01-2018 under my hand and seal of the court.
Seal.
SUNNY SHARMA (HAS),
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate,
Kullu, District Kullu, H.P.
____________
In the Court of Shri Sunny Sharma, H.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional
Magistrate, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P.
In the matter of :
1.
Sikander Singh Gill s/o Shri Kamaljit Singh Gill, resident of H.No.14, Bhupender
Vihar, AWHO Complex Scheme No. 78 Indore, M.P.
2. Mamta Rani d/o Sh. Hari Dass, resident of H.No. 197 Barabhuin, Post Office & Tehsil
Bhunter, District Kullu, H.P.
. . Applicants.
Versus
General Public
Subject.—Proclamation for the registration of Marriage under section 16 of Special Marriage Act,
1954.
Sikander Singh Gill and Mamta Rani have filed an application alongwith affidavits in the
court of undersigned under section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have solemnized
their marriage on 01-02-2015 and they are living as husband and wife since then, hence their
marriage may be registered under Act, ibid.
Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who
has any objection regarding this marriage can file the objection personally or writing before this
court on or before 18-02-2018. The objection received after 18-02-2018 will not be entertained and
marriage will be registered accordingly.
Issued today on 18-01-2018 under my hand and seal of the court.
Seal.
SUNNY SHARMA (HAS),
Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate,
Kullu, District Kullu, H.P.
10603
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
In the Court of Sub Divisional Magistrate Nalagarh, District Solan (H.P.) exercising the
powers of Marriage Officer under Special Marriage Act, 1954
Case No. : ..../ 2018 Date of Inst. : 19-01-2018
Pending for : 19-02-2018
Shri Suraj Bisht
V/s
General Public
Notice u/s 15 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 inviting the objections of the General
Public for registration of marriage.
Notice to the General Public.
Whereas, Shri Suraj Bisht s/o Shri Mohan Singh, r/o Ward No. 2 Nalagarh, Tehsil Nalagarh
District Solan, H. P. and Smt. Jainav Khatun d/o Sh. Fajjal w/o Shri Suraj Bisht s/o Shri Mohan
Singh, r/o Ward No. 2 Nalagarh, Tehsil Nalagarh, District Solan, H. P. have moved an application
u/s 15 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 for registration of their marriage that was solemnized on
01-10-2015.
And, whereas both these applicants have submitted in their application and in their
affidavits that they were unmarried at the time of solemnization of their marriage and were major in
age and having no prohibited relations to each other debarring them to marry each other. Both the
applicants have requested for registration of their marriage.
Therefore, by this notice the public in general is informed that if any one has any objection
regarding registration of this marriage, he may present before this court on or before 19-02-2018
for hearing of objections if any. In case no objection is received by dated 19-02-2018, it will be
presumed that there is no objection to the registration of the above said marriage and the same will
be registered on the said date.
Given under my hand and seal of the court on 19-01-2018.
Seal.
Sd/-
Marriage Officer-cum- SDM,
Nalagarh, District Solan, H. P.
____________
In the Court of Shri Chander Mohan Thakur, Assistant Collector (IInd Grade)-cum-Naib
(Tehsildar) Solan, District Solan, H. P.
Case No. 22/9 of 2017 :
Smt. Savita Sharma w/o Sh. Ravi Sharma r/o Village & P.O. Salogra, Tehsil & District
Solan, H. P.
Applicant.
Versus
10604
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
Smt. Saroj w/o Sh. Tek Ram Verma, R/o Vill. Bail, P.O. Salogra, Tehsil & District Solan,
H.P.
. .Respondent.
Application under section 123 of H.P. Land Revenue Act for partition of the land
comprised in the Khata/ Khatauni No. 11/12 Khasra No. 10, 24, 28, 45, 75, 108, 109, 116, 117
Kitta 9, measuring 31—06 Bigha, Khata/Kh. No. 14/15 Khasra No.1, 4, 6, 13, 14, 17, 22, 27, 30,
31, 33, 40, 50, 51, 60, 63, 65, 67, 69, 74, 76, 79, 87, 88, 91, 92, 95, 150, 106, 125, 126, 139, 142,
Kitta 33 measuring 101-09-00 Bighas situated at Mouza Bail, Patwar Circle Salogra, Tehsil and
District Solan, Himachal Pradesh.
Whereas in the above noted case it has been proved to the satisfaction of this court that the
service upon the respondent mentioned below is not popssible by ordinary mode of service.
Hence this proclamation under order 5, Rule 20, of CPC is hereby issued against the
respondents mentioned below the respondents to appear in this court on 19-02-2018 at 2.00 p.m.
personally or through pleader to defend the case failing which she will be against exparte
Notice to :—
1.
Smt. Nidhi Thakur w/o Sh. Sukesh Kutty r/o of Vill. Bail, P.O. Salogra, Tehsil &
District Solan.
Given under my hand and seal of the court on this 18-1-2018.
Seal.
CHANDER MOHAN THAKUR,
Assistant Collector (IInd Grade)-cum-Naib (Tehsildar),
Solan, District Solan, H. P.
___________
In the Court of Shri Chander Mohan Thakur, Executive Magistrate (Naib-Tehsildar)
Solan, District Solan, H. P.
Case No. : 03/2018 Date of Institution : 08-02-2018 Date of Decision/
07-03-2018
Smt. Laxmi Devi d/o Late Shri Jagdish Chand, r/o Village Devoli-ki-Ser, P.O. Basal,
Tehsil & District Solan, Himachal Pradesh
. .Applicant.
Versus
General Public
. .Respondent.
Application under section 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969.
Smt. Laxmi Devi d/o Late Shri Jagdish Chand, r/o Village Devoli-ki-Ser, P.O. Basal,
Tehsil & District Solan, Himachal Pradesh has submitted an application before the undersigned
under section 13(3) of Birth & Death Registration Act, 1969 alongwith affidavit and other
documents to enter the date of birth i.e. 07-05-1978 as her date of birth could not be entered in the
record of Municipal Council Solan.
Therefore, by this proclamation, the general public is hereby informed that any person
having any objection for the registration of delayed date of birth of Laxmi Devi d/o Late
10605
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
Sh. Jagdish Chand may submit their objection in writing in this court on or before 07-03-2018 at
10.00 A.M. failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of date.
Given under my hand and seal of the court on this 08th day of February, 2018.
Seal.
CHANDER MOHAN THAKUR,
Executive Magistrate (Tehsildar),
Solan, District Solan, H. P.
_____________
HIMACHAL PRADESH THIRTEENTH VIDHAN SABHA
NOTIFICATION
Shimla–171004, the 13th February, 2018
No. V.S.-Legn. -Panel /1–21/2018.—In pursuance of Rule 12 of the Rules of Procedure
and Conduct of Business of Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly, 1973, the Hon’ble Speaker is
pleased to nominate the following Members on the panel of presiding Chairmen for the year 2018 :
1.
Shri Ramesh Chand Dhawala (12 - Jawalamukhi)
2.
Shri Narinder Bragta (65-Jubbal Kotkhai)
3.
Shri Harshwardhan Chauhan (59-Shillai)
4.
Shri Rakesh Pathania (6-Nurpur)
SUNDER SINGH VERMA,
Secretary,
H.P. Vidhan Sabha.
_____________
HIMACHAL PRADESH THIRTEENTH VIDHAN SABHA
NOTIFICATION
Shimla–171004, the 15st February, 2018
No. V.S.-Legn.-Pri/1-1/2018.—The following order by the Governor of the State of
Himachal Pradesh, dated the 13th February, 2018 is hereby published for general information:—
^^eSa] vkpk;Z nsoozr] jkT;iky] fgekpy izns'k] Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 174 ¼1½ }kjk iznÙk
'kfDr;ksa ds vuqlj.k esa fgekpy izns'k rsjgoha fo/kku lHkk ds f}rh; l= dk vkºoku eaxyokj]
6 ekpZ] 2018 dks iwokZà 11-00 cts ls fgekpy izns'k fo/kku lHkk] f'keyk esa leosr gksus ds fy,
djrk gwaA
vkpk;Z nsoozr]
jkT;iky]
fgekpy izns'kA**
By Order:-
(SUNDER SINGH VERMA),
Secretary,
H.P. Vidhan Sabha.
10606
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 16 Qjojh] 2018@27 ek?k] 1939
fgekpy izns'k rsjgoha fo/kku lHkk
vf/klwpuk
f'keyk&171004] 15 Qjojh] 2018
la0%fo0l0&fo/kk;u&izk0@1&1@2018-&&jkT;iky egksn; dk fuEufyf[kr vkns'k fnukad
13 Qjojh] 2018 loZlk/kkj.k dh lwpukFkZ izdkf'kr fd;k tkrk gS %&&
^^eSa] vkpk;Z nsoozr] jkT;iky] fgekpy izns'k] Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 174 ¼1½ }kjk iznÙk
'kfDr;ksa ds vuqlj.k esa fgekpy izns'k rsjgoha fo/kku lHkk ds f}rh; l= dk vkºoku eaxyokj]
6 ekpZ] 2018 dks iwokZà 11-00 cts ls fgekpy izns'k fo/kku lHkk] f'keyk esa leosr gksus ds fy,
djrk gwaA
vkpk;Z nsoozr]
jkT;iky]
fgekpy izns'kA**
vkns'k }kjk%&
¼lqUnj flag oekZ½
lfpo]
fg0 iz0 fo/kku lHkk A
fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr
bysDVªkWfud gLrk{kfjr jkti=] oSclkbV http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in ij miyC/k gS ,oe~ vkWuykbu lR;kfir fd;k tk ldrk gS